{"meta":{"query_hash":"af0063289f12","filters":{"topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies"},"cohort_total":2179,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2179,"exported":2179,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/af0063289f12","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Multicultural+Socio-Legal+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1021136529","doi":"10.2986/tren.006-1604","title":"Recapturing The Evangelism Mandate In Emmanuel Baptist Church, Exeter, Ontario","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Evangelism; Religious studies; Mandate; Theology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.04030248226078317,"score_gpt":0.31351091947928655,"score_spread":0.2732084372185034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1021136529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62938404,0.0009105671,2.5153082e-7,0.0008934241,0.0016223222,0.00057894975,0.00000450145,0.00007618872,0.36652976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45021135,0.00281444,0.00011319859,0.00014827495,0.00052567304,0.000144905,0.0001577286,0.00002782791,0.5458566],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978271,0.00018156716,0.0003688301,0.00040893894,0.0006949202,0.00051864824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921584,0.00018947448,0.00018401971,0.0002027877,0.00012622403,0.00008164825],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041910095,0.00029977728,0.0003699329,0.00006086709,0.0013568304,0.00015949934,0.00054215617,0.00034828688,0.00084827427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019836312,0.00019515982,0.00016917006,0.00019093389,0.00021691194,0.00021864372,0.00005744033,0.00070743763,0.00018143978],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006569481,0.00006673611,0.0062680817,0.000052755364,0.00011212072,0.0000532926,0.9534143,0.0000051833595,0.000053388805,0.0013276922,0.028720492,0.009860238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036684627,0.000016561138,0.31334826,0.00016617379,0.000046425474,0.0000011887779,0.071891025,0.000004071483,0.00004820107,0.00027558306,0.6132784,0.00055723963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77333194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9883715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8815233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010450932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021157145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W102505703","doi":"","title":"Returning to Find Much Wealth: Identifying the Need for a Revised Judicial Approach to Aboriginal Kinship in British Columbia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kinship; Legislature; Statutory law; Political science; Law; Sociology; Fictive kinship; Kinship care; Genealogy; History","score_opus":0.04992723044586038,"score_gpt":0.3764465545138259,"score_spread":0.3265193240679655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W102505703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.690758,0.116652794,0.00012045159,0.01886002,0.0034154598,0.018076647,0.0001753669,0.00018848898,0.15175276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97122407,0.022980584,0.00087482535,0.0032456052,0.0007931812,0.00061301194,0.000027110424,0.000022486647,0.00021914147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978541,0.00015497171,0.00061253714,0.00036054917,0.00049012835,0.00052769366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899006,0.00012134428,0.00023724564,0.00019129807,0.00023696723,0.00022307942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025947827,0.0001505368,0.0005784766,0.000017096307,0.0011930843,0.00028589327,0.00040690112,0.000087842505,0.000021518861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035385304,0.00013254653,0.00014973085,0.00046127886,0.00036039774,0.0002163614,0.00009684302,0.0004072484,0.0000046817427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046857655,0.00028876928,0.003818972,0.01650602,0.00006835671,0.0000020171801,0.023356559,3.685327e-7,0.00018745643,0.8011232,0.010665244,0.14393617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000347478,0.0000450254,0.0067132628,0.00570977,0.000047812722,0.0000018438599,0.0012344003,0.0000030146696,0.00000506605,0.0006068936,0.9850596,0.00022581039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1605472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45296836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9743944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001576374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008475894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91763604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W103406808","doi":"10.1017/ccol9780521888622","title":"The Cambridge Companion to Thomas More","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Rhetoric; Heresy; Humanism; Literature; Performance art; Art; Classics; Power (physics); History; Opposition (politics); Art history; Philosophy; Theology; Law","score_opus":0.042569601529901545,"score_gpt":0.2581052821609236,"score_spread":0.21553568063102205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W103406808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044357346,0.00040095285,0.00002928451,0.0005216952,0.00089797174,0.0012828696,0.00018436281,0.0002840845,0.9959552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011806983,0.00044852163,0.00006563914,0.00015355054,0.0006379847,0.000006047575,0.000027586271,0.000039873852,0.9974401],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972516,0.00034846345,0.00024747723,0.0006123486,0.0007552091,0.0007849421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796313,0.00032350793,0.0002787768,0.0005562737,0.00043690557,0.00044141337],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042918266,0.00045986698,0.0005130743,0.00007661663,0.00374247,0.00018363816,0.0015647013,0.00045788664,0.000004045655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000098415,0.00038484298,0.0003354417,0.000045773042,0.001442112,0.00013850782,0.0008748174,0.0006215029,0.000134164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037203885,0.000008177038,0.000009728787,0.00001791691,0.00011352052,0.000040631672,0.0030921404,4.4622738e-7,0.0000050457957,0.45572922,0.5403949,0.00055109715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024160868,0.00003062988,0.0005039842,0.00009966054,0.00016211654,0.000001252937,0.0037931893,0.000002428823,0.00003071616,0.0000034196469,0.9946176,0.000513387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013720226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041870042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4557258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014908329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043042793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1037789193","doi":"","title":"Fr. Lawrence Dewan, O.P","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œreview of metaphysics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Nephew and niece; Religious studies; History; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.07489256362230107,"score_gpt":0.35215576938819443,"score_spread":0.27726320576589336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1037789193","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027495867,0.631617,0.00058450404,0.031616654,0.0021209158,0.002760601,0.000045191977,0.0002819181,0.30347732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91317606,0.07757242,0.0016934916,0.0036220436,0.0008217116,0.000098508855,0.0000073244905,0.000021440086,0.0029869939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982138,0.00039904026,0.0002688344,0.00015291882,0.000717081,0.00024832194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879974,0.00018285762,0.00021938239,0.00025599808,0.00043280586,0.00010922054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014876036,0.00012605674,0.0003788807,0.000007492666,0.00032082718,0.000023439485,0.0005372364,0.000036927777,0.0000456037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035664297,0.00007343941,0.00020321108,0.00044271562,0.0005447941,0.00017552476,0.000106625084,0.00012757833,0.00015646209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017827284,0.00045450413,0.0027558426,0.0035193989,0.000747038,0.000006031936,0.090608396,0.000019734236,0.00022524003,0.333296,0.30489254,0.26345745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011858331,0.00002203951,0.00056820025,0.0005659187,0.00015329289,2.1363113e-7,0.0032955746,0.000005715627,0.00006127793,0.0039330753,0.9911188,0.00015730056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026863732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010130034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8856802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006608696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000114120834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40610105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W104007895","doi":"10.29173/alr107","title":"The Crown's Duty to Consult Aboriginal Peoples: Towards an Understanding of the Source, Purpose, and Limits of the Duty","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"BC Hydro (Canada)","funders":"Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers","keywords":"Duty; Obligation; Crown (dentistry); Law; Political science; Treaty; Fiduciary; Law and economics; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.057877087254941825,"score_gpt":0.35154756707407236,"score_spread":0.2936704798191305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W104007895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5875396,0.18986855,0.00002041955,0.08687687,0.0016428562,0.005437628,0.000035103683,0.00004495785,0.12853397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711001,0.026375273,0.000028897706,0.0010562234,0.00010243737,0.00003153723,4.2923003e-7,0.000008479022,0.001296608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981159,0.0005701783,0.00032985114,0.0001572052,0.0004619608,0.00036493017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981927,0.00094337825,0.000257169,0.00033465316,0.00014307248,0.00012902329],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011263696,0.00015033026,0.00034810998,0.000005015744,0.00157315,0.0000516818,0.0005586962,0.000058730773,0.000039606373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012937437,0.00006260458,0.00014962793,0.00039642837,0.0012015214,0.00019982275,0.0001134862,0.00013532022,0.0000059691015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013305503,0.00006965526,0.031164566,0.0007187588,0.00011525199,8.078563e-8,0.067455664,8.2779957e-7,0.000060417435,0.893148,0.003113127,0.0041403556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011671962,0.00002295803,0.024784697,0.0011330703,0.00017486118,0.0000015710089,0.009023117,6.4153596e-7,0.00009020932,0.00018087096,0.9643253,0.00014596913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04028503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13035327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96121216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000118934884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000102150814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W109252628","doi":"10.29173/alr305","title":"Parenting Beyond the Nuclear Family: Doe v. Alberta","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Enforcement; Charter; Family law; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.032320399046580524,"score_gpt":0.32318214436563886,"score_spread":0.29086174531905834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W109252628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011932225,0.0654022,0.0000018144225,0.037669256,0.0005802279,0.0010062844,0.0000013526025,0.000056078865,0.88335055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8235654,0.097422235,0.00028268187,0.051262643,0.0011511284,0.000065875865,0.000013465143,0.00006697943,0.026169572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778986,0.0002727381,0.0004545502,0.00031837952,0.0004995392,0.00066495506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976741,0.0015149353,0.00020215375,0.00032861068,0.000121350444,0.00015885402],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016167618,0.00021438714,0.00040066196,0.000008965059,0.0020758521,0.000115981245,0.00061467796,0.00009351911,0.0006324221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011404357,0.0001268986,0.00024925108,0.00039218232,0.0005866942,0.00025464254,0.00017654417,0.00023808915,0.0010434036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047132817,0.000052222746,0.001222687,0.00036469015,0.00012917898,0.0000043283494,0.017084137,1.5510969e-7,0.000026717418,0.8993855,0.05283463,0.028891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076220174,0.000008917364,0.0012743362,0.0004980369,0.00010123256,0.0000011220085,0.0016139323,9.316099e-7,0.0000031983711,0.0002546654,0.9959625,0.00020491412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2717429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29735053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9431279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011812682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025974246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W109278735","doi":"10.21991/c9z079","title":"COULD THE MEECH LAKE ACCORD AFFECT THE PROTECTION OF EQUALITY RIGHTS FOR WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CANADA?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Political science; Gender equality; Environmental protection; Public administration; Socioeconomics; Environmental planning; Geography; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.056049261806597354,"score_gpt":0.28504674326278334,"score_spread":0.22899748145618598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W109278735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86657,0.0020441692,0.0074710227,0.025794504,0.003540964,0.007898439,0.0011063671,0.00013967227,0.08543489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998463,0.000046182326,0.00013434517,0.00026574844,0.00008795926,0.0006886428,0.000008614254,0.0000033999206,0.00030216234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979683,0.00021694398,0.00043331838,0.00028212738,0.00047104523,0.0006282304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986981,0.0004961463,0.00021054759,0.0001746237,0.00032037092,0.00010020706],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010853509,0.00020475648,0.00029477026,0.00004908593,0.0030838214,0.000046963094,0.0003344098,0.000117307245,0.000079456324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006589302,0.00012318621,0.000092946684,0.00027014548,0.0076069226,0.00036048607,0.00011324995,0.00022206987,0.0000027355595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008725301,0.00003646681,0.033160184,0.000031012838,0.00006518021,0.0000013816557,0.004846591,0.000020823427,0.000020663589,0.96035737,0.00075619837,0.00061690353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030879874,0.00019991683,0.090611786,0.00026262362,0.00011511741,0.000040191953,0.184761,0.0002983668,0.00074255007,0.18874124,0.5301179,0.0010212725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6902221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9779532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7716161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008102708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023515979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W109892788","doi":"10.14264/10615","title":"Transforming Constitutionalism: Indigenous-White Relations in Canada, 1983-1987","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"The University of Queensland","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Indigenous; Politics; Negotiation; Diversity (politics); Order (exchange); Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Sociology; Democracy; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.013156056974152362,"score_gpt":0.23443343750487244,"score_spread":0.22127738053072007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W109892788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85894775,0.00046187226,0.000003999193,0.0013351118,0.00015138811,0.00041044623,0.00010651649,0.000013940775,0.13856898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97206336,0.0006784004,0.000031153915,0.000021497179,0.00003548209,4.542261e-7,0.00014127615,0.000004132232,0.02702426],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990649,0.00012233823,0.00013416076,0.00013023593,0.0003408955,0.00020745647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995584,0.00012544819,0.000111994086,0.00007335933,0.00008390775,0.000046885074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017104874,0.000108235115,0.00021182667,0.000049432845,0.0012906549,0.0000087104745,0.00025561635,0.00013060198,0.0005510126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024174464,0.000096899515,0.00006577614,0.00019538497,0.0002942625,0.00009961494,0.000007458455,0.00024915184,0.000012558032],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020481063,0.00003653989,0.04639659,0.00006103044,0.00017530604,0.00004640721,0.93734705,0.0007564021,0.000009926357,0.0069274125,0.005642162,0.0023963833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006345842,0.000012752526,0.33581346,0.00024775715,0.00017293288,8.6292914e-7,0.41975915,0.00000978482,0.000011253651,0.00042176148,0.24254288,0.00037279958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9899581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51758784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092676526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024806645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9926805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W110264515","doi":"","title":"Access to Charter Justice and the Rule of Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Constitutional law; Rule of law; Common law; Politics","score_opus":0.021474389761905473,"score_gpt":0.3327613843592749,"score_spread":0.3112869945973694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W110264515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7101708,0.006581428,0.0003346477,0.22329615,0.00036540048,0.0005641904,0.0000020472933,0.000038922433,0.05864639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941307,0.0029223408,0.00002984046,0.0016068381,0.0003729428,0.0000025744985,1.0845354e-7,0.0000029885975,0.00093171105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838907,0.00013783932,0.0001518741,0.000090153626,0.00028089376,0.00095018465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957997,0.00009717216,0.00008914656,0.00005643208,0.000107524706,0.000069760215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015819179,0.000073369905,0.00014897391,0.000016148508,0.00097622926,0.00012055957,0.00032283252,0.000036775175,0.000019050016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017131033,0.000042013904,0.00005761224,0.000116012634,0.0002753657,0.00025514048,0.00003733491,0.0004938265,0.000007647165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055102413,0.00001691663,0.000112158654,0.0000023024957,0.00004459083,3.8504544e-7,0.020760328,0.0000032703908,0.000073273484,0.9689053,0.0002184373,0.009807932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036763109,0.0005411295,0.02627369,0.0000703568,0.00052687165,0.000052868858,0.080776274,0.000019999263,0.0002583717,0.7631924,0.12408322,0.0005285082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018071716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004911952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28395984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025045645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019896374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7508465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W114583704","doi":"","title":"A Right to Voluntary Euthanasia? Confusion in Canada in Carter","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Notre Dame journal of law, ethics & public policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Life imprisonment; Assisted suicide; Economic Justice; Constitutional right; Prison; Medicine","score_opus":0.06317269375793548,"score_gpt":0.36378146148433516,"score_spread":0.30060876772639966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W114583704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6507953,0.0001171182,0.00001272718,0.3207349,0.00047846133,0.00019384648,0.000015409581,0.000010902412,0.027641358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840635,0.000110832756,0.00019575203,0.014381118,0.0009502894,0.0000051857064,0.0000020939065,0.000012826456,0.00027839036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960574,0.0010175399,0.0007063302,0.00020716462,0.0012650782,0.00074648415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754995,0.0008545509,0.0003303522,0.00016370548,0.00059269014,0.0005087469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033835624,0.0001915282,0.00048090008,0.00027697175,0.00045292714,0.00014105756,0.00064054836,0.000263782,0.00011311324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004113007,0.00015494922,0.0001006048,0.00078370655,0.0003135238,0.0005185505,0.00013443659,0.0014679205,0.000010646312],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010191105,0.00028856174,0.1716159,0.00008560525,0.00014696605,0.00022921567,0.37899503,0.00019888149,0.0005391832,0.4069359,0.03021179,0.01065105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001039216,0.00009658487,0.11909964,0.00020992836,0.000015814154,0.000012467238,0.009007383,0.00004144955,0.00005321361,0.0047747344,0.86526924,0.00038032714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9937856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99912024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83505744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031819018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005391034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9563463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1149290347","doi":"","title":"The Most Comprehensive Judicial Record Ever Produced: The Polygamy Reference","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Emory law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Supreme court; Conviction; Economic Justice; Political science; Statutory law; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.10628026660196352,"score_gpt":0.345984453224142,"score_spread":0.2397041866221785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1149290347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5330774,0.0055852192,0.000012672482,0.14762762,0.0077866525,0.0009167472,0.000009882072,0.00013837316,0.30484542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991435,0.0005439506,0.00011820062,0.0013957695,0.0034743014,0.000011374652,6.835973e-7,0.000011256678,0.003009494],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742335,0.00074488466,0.00029120015,0.00017526491,0.0008640558,0.00050126534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825394,0.00035267306,0.00023446101,0.00018525233,0.0007394257,0.00023425168],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013551654,0.00014725432,0.00017820124,0.000010677746,0.0074552586,0.00042246148,0.00066814414,0.00007726321,0.00008205246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007268565,0.00007041599,0.00008312867,0.00020934065,0.001207164,0.00031559527,0.0001378303,0.00069521443,0.00015475458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003642359,0.0001362222,0.0057306807,0.000008218582,0.00042660243,0.000083705505,0.15088736,0.000052674834,0.00039805588,0.15216441,0.60922956,0.08051828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027239084,0.00004823368,0.0051868674,0.000017630888,0.000024073783,0.000020695219,0.045448735,0.0000034582456,0.00004515286,0.004618128,0.9441709,0.00014372781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014374659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02838534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45835757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029389097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021971762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1160745365","doi":"","title":"Lord Mansfield: Justice in the Age of Reason","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business law international","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Economic Justice; Biography; Queen (butterfly); Scots; Throne; History; Religious studies; Classics; Art; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Literature","score_opus":0.08182934633893763,"score_gpt":0.3589090174403682,"score_spread":0.27707967110143056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1160745365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23851867,0.00020038991,0.00019691406,0.03568702,0.0020855316,0.00025295778,0.0000106898015,0.000033284887,0.72301453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99759215,0.000049941573,0.00023245225,0.0005268098,0.00042668602,0.000013095989,0.000010507328,0.0000026562798,0.0011457059],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908215,0.00008221581,0.00013320218,0.00008861292,0.0005047015,0.0001091271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993694,0.00012893695,0.000053176707,0.000061817496,0.00036687066,0.000019811574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004535436,0.00005343165,0.00008044767,0.000016642723,0.00010844529,0.00004620736,0.00036731077,0.00004367484,0.00007251215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006464935,0.000035791963,0.00002475183,0.00018733481,0.00023757634,0.00017799519,0.000047033664,0.00006754095,0.00001889719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003700655,0.00012389543,0.0074412646,0.00001595664,0.000025074434,0.000027371809,0.038586948,0.00009685524,0.00004237887,0.94280887,0.009256202,0.0015381965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049996783,0.000009784558,0.10941295,0.000045986166,0.000023068618,0.0000017473054,0.023383124,0.00003223583,0.000022769605,0.0041640745,0.86228395,0.00012033086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030715197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018656071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93864477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007850495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003587594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1162489397","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1316","title":"Legal Pluralism and Human Agency","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Normative; Plural; Pluralism (philosophy); Theme (computing); Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Scholarship; Agency (philosophy); Law and economics; Legal realism; Legal research; Political science; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02487907968279396,"score_gpt":0.305183783413715,"score_spread":0.28030470373092103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1162489397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16746916,0.00093038706,0.000013667888,0.004388309,0.00033221432,0.00010832036,0.000003185228,0.000060645125,0.82669413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99193656,0.00013511408,0.00049632776,0.00016653512,0.0014441471,0.0000035288263,0.0000017989033,0.000010494084,0.005805495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985058,0.00017258315,0.0002619827,0.00016521347,0.00045959887,0.00043485832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944794,0.000045654862,0.00013805015,0.00006970421,0.00012904267,0.00016963466],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047554477,0.000138873,0.00018528759,0.00002200485,0.0042995387,0.00044082303,0.0002035979,0.00009802809,0.00030850762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004087095,0.00010920407,0.000098192155,0.00008412422,0.0005077304,0.0005141749,0.000058546277,0.0003159254,0.00003032625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027652623,0.00003113387,0.0025584486,0.0000028291913,0.000020859401,0.00004402175,0.0026889648,0.0000036365238,0.00050548866,0.98998284,0.0035051256,0.00065385934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012394093,0.00010406536,0.0854298,0.00007335459,0.00008865893,0.00011675038,0.0049682325,0.000004772393,0.00021965322,0.18799381,0.71907467,0.00068680657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4816975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48897925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8244674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014712341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024288722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W116455860","doi":"10.21991/c98h3r","title":"THE CHARTER’S BURDENS: THE RETURN TO THE \"PRESUMPTION OF VALIDITY\" IN SECTION 7 OF THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Presumption; Political science; Section (typography); Law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.04946066497352069,"score_gpt":0.2699278153999215,"score_spread":0.2204671504264008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W116455860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8386536,0.0018435221,0.0009594892,0.07793506,0.0067087323,0.0044626915,0.00055869244,0.000052843487,0.06882535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992442,0.00007432279,0.000039511204,0.0002206028,0.00014504022,0.00007182183,0.000004184422,0.0000030477463,0.00019726463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979958,0.00029133455,0.0005073893,0.00022060522,0.00054232695,0.00044255302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856347,0.00030277116,0.00028438418,0.0003134125,0.0004311297,0.00010481813],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011465459,0.00016776306,0.00022670004,0.000074739,0.0038577185,0.000044054617,0.0005610923,0.00014724056,0.00005110307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005940142,0.00007828973,0.0001498368,0.00040571057,0.011821308,0.0002441402,0.000141149,0.00025732737,0.0000074039326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035689267,0.000028450484,0.033579964,0.0000086044465,0.000055541987,6.2925034e-7,0.010125335,0.000049768707,0.0001641155,0.9533364,0.0024031415,0.00021235623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021137549,0.00022669327,0.38609973,0.0007927556,0.00027071187,0.00005763908,0.062653944,0.00043492139,0.0033313215,0.0839191,0.4592931,0.0008063463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2575435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7957008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8694173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026806176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006975234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99743915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W117375820","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1020","title":"Social Justice and the Charter: Comparison and Choice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Law Foundation of British Columbia","keywords":"Charter; Injustice; Jurisprudence; Politics; Economic Justice; Political science; Contemplation; Law and economics; Law; Oppression; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03995650515247766,"score_gpt":0.33295987278218564,"score_spread":0.29300336762970797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W117375820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.157447,0.0048958915,0.00006194008,0.1260694,0.0008173055,0.0006961323,0.0000034627517,0.000080614285,0.7099283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99636734,0.00056507916,0.00020056356,0.00077959144,0.0013928238,0.000012324373,3.19158e-7,0.0000066925413,0.0006752797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863166,0.0003432301,0.00021180206,0.00012926703,0.00035382487,0.00033024032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991365,0.0003607516,0.00015384315,0.00004601758,0.00015132483,0.00015157236],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006546975,0.000116105824,0.00023277356,0.000009773345,0.005514479,0.00062820053,0.00017865488,0.00008087458,0.00014644502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018926943,0.00006862125,0.00005884712,0.0000586729,0.0012416377,0.0004065758,0.000080276244,0.0003738726,0.000036340185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002523656,0.00004332676,0.005490616,0.000025020126,0.000119988894,0.000002568645,0.071457155,0.0000012254313,0.000062028565,0.8938433,0.018236227,0.010693295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008608072,0.00014957278,0.21092547,0.00010944521,0.0010711831,0.0000913848,0.15682003,0.0006714127,0.000037186554,0.113445304,0.50699514,0.0010757871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.089405306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08018452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83892035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055697707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014190258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W117897452","doi":"","title":"The Written Word and the Constitution's Vital Unstated Assumptions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Secession; Judicial independence; Jurisdiction; Legitimacy; Certiorari; Constitutionalism; Original jurisdiction; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.016703175072308618,"score_gpt":0.27265182767846075,"score_spread":0.2559486526061521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W117897452","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38429254,0.08615277,0.0008615083,0.42661127,0.0014070462,0.001274327,0.000008792181,0.00021366662,0.099178076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94460577,0.0483898,0.000013159714,0.00012131443,0.00032858746,0.000010929595,3.4526866e-7,0.000003730173,0.0065263845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997671,0.00037515323,0.00017803584,0.0001060261,0.00033739556,0.0013323517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923086,0.00039723894,0.00010833969,0.00007291303,0.000120443816,0.000070199916],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022215368,0.00009770355,0.00011661749,0.000015768523,0.0068558776,0.0002994299,0.00026020856,0.000051350682,0.000054043197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004659271,0.00004695234,0.0000873615,0.00018206605,0.0020924052,0.00021519362,0.00003965389,0.0010782988,0.000049376777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018786024,0.000015253329,0.00061470753,4.718383e-7,0.00016458929,0.0000011444954,0.0065819155,0.000004419552,0.000008584192,0.96645826,0.0012339683,0.024897914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030749477,0.00008552004,0.004008692,0.000024094226,0.00017511251,0.00018061152,0.1289733,0.00017456776,0.0000041809817,0.27741906,0.58550537,0.00037453158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012610605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01796851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6890392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062719604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027110966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1194035364","doi":"10.71781/1674","title":"Convergences et divergences dans les conceptions de la morale de Ronald Dworkin et Alasdair MacIntyre","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Theology; Psychology","score_opus":0.011219572975389008,"score_gpt":0.21916592921255457,"score_spread":0.20794635623716556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1194035364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5881458,0.00272107,0.00004758327,0.0075270906,0.00086381123,0.00034097102,0.00063645147,0.000023680059,0.39969358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9383337,0.011100179,0.0010652565,0.0008097221,0.000114143,0.000032568892,0.000059232363,0.000023695518,0.048461515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959892,0.0008885946,0.00042842704,0.00040406818,0.0017036183,0.00058610475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814564,0.0008775511,0.0004310333,0.0001233048,0.0000034637033,0.00041898494],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000074585994,0.0004021485,0.0004503007,0.000019141455,0.0011838581,0.00006308607,0.00050671113,0.00015845477,0.0005940262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025734584,0.0003758751,0.000106917134,0.0001529765,0.001191432,0.0005385562,0.00014611143,0.00041570122,3.464869e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016686012,0.000076373486,0.38966063,0.0003289698,0.00034846313,0.000059214173,0.06461415,0.0002697463,0.0031468917,0.53635305,0.0023278422,0.0026478095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024745695,0.000080592225,0.59165764,0.00042853094,0.00015521623,0.0000034837738,0.32015908,0.00044416607,0.008905017,0.0039526816,0.07332564,0.0006404724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43090442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.866928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53240037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059170055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036801856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1203365843","doi":"10.20381/ruor-7754","title":"\"Les règles de la folie\" ou sur l'introduction du syndrome prémenstruel dans les cours canadiennes de justice.","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"uO Research (University of Ottawa)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04140649640362288,"score_gpt":0.32638365294830113,"score_spread":0.28497715654467826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1203365843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93748546,0.00044445216,0.000027992637,0.0066747544,0.0003915548,0.0005355208,0.00015559846,0.000062468855,0.054222222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9290259,0.0050675822,0.000834263,0.0000057578045,0.00050595007,0.00000447312,0.00013587083,0.000031782,0.06438844],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943993,0.0020214226,0.00026058994,0.0006799637,0.0013236159,0.0013151274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685365,0.0010760512,0.00027392065,0.00025647343,0.0010378029,0.0005021073],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023583316,0.00035965737,0.0005707208,0.00036158404,0.005412977,0.00011091319,0.0010520266,0.00075186684,0.001180183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00104261,0.00042545344,0.00029416947,0.0009612297,0.003713168,0.00049726025,0.00012029766,0.0011002669,0.00006179838],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016309373,0.0008355048,0.2699328,0.0022130653,0.0012662623,0.0009962652,0.46430042,0.0011854118,0.0027991678,0.18547468,0.03443533,0.03639797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038394867,0.0001530266,0.49017686,0.00017466172,0.00030548268,0.00002511766,0.3988951,0.0002909354,0.000068004105,0.00030788037,0.10886971,0.00034925676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49408022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70468616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22024404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032537808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096718816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1204211868","doi":"","title":"Locke, Hegel, and Rights to Property: Examining the Unstable Ideological Architecture of the Canadian Law of Aboriginal Title","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Supreme court; Law; Ideology; Alienation; Economic Justice; Political science; Sketch; Common law; Sociology; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.0361020778043293,"score_gpt":0.29859178862363817,"score_spread":0.2624897108193089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1204211868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48024574,0.00012273248,0.0000018009072,0.002556254,0.000106356725,0.0002569299,0.0000021524543,0.000007401861,0.5167006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935066,0.0000017440844,0.00012829853,0.00017214734,0.00006450171,0.000004084837,7.932729e-8,0.000001275069,0.006121271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999533,0.00007222678,0.000056870216,0.000050294835,0.00013478677,0.00015285052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997747,0.000045672063,0.000019376912,0.00005748274,0.00003608481,0.00006671462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020842555,0.000038173705,0.000067631816,0.000005931374,0.00044322776,0.000011011631,0.000113799855,0.000028844159,0.00025140343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003548009,0.000012599083,0.0000124564485,0.000091809154,0.00031255363,0.00002794153,0.000026534468,0.00005937999,0.000011458977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011012325,0.0000903679,0.23468152,0.000018699995,0.000079502635,0.0000012111216,0.13751304,0.000010136206,0.0003475119,0.60619575,0.017794143,0.0032570849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039516362,0.000023217252,0.054118015,0.0000068595687,0.000009409501,3.5322017e-7,0.0030170917,7.384597e-7,0.00023210164,0.00034116165,0.9421641,0.000047412883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70086294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8874685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003448861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004090814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34089944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W120566640","doi":"10.29173/alr101","title":"Gender in Automobile Insurance Underwriting: Some Insureds Are More Equal Than Others","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Underwriting; Business; Actuarial science; Insurance industry; Insurance policy; Variable (mathematics); Law; Political science","score_opus":0.052200477365829695,"score_gpt":0.3345803080456482,"score_spread":0.28237983067981853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W120566640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4757553,0.2980488,0.000004160866,0.05075042,0.0006432613,0.0050858967,0.000019441826,0.0002783177,0.16941443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97031283,0.022754785,0.00006114662,0.004869622,0.00016721821,0.00033901804,0.000004910587,0.000022939243,0.0014675021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776745,0.00038190268,0.00044621102,0.0003724614,0.00044971253,0.00058229326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887323,0.00038676066,0.00021154448,0.00025150363,0.00012000799,0.00015695405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004944027,0.00023931953,0.0005533658,0.000019948364,0.00047844602,0.00009063205,0.0004107351,0.00013057995,0.000638768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052774773,0.00018498,0.0001662946,0.00039199792,0.00046304686,0.000668198,0.00009393743,0.00023733727,0.0005824878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007227964,0.00045624032,0.2281491,0.0043492042,0.00029762162,0.00002110775,0.067055285,0.000018016117,0.00007083495,0.65879256,0.021851622,0.018931163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006094809,0.000032822103,0.19410703,0.004222551,0.000061313774,0.0000023672899,0.0069068447,0.000014158613,0.000016035592,0.0039199525,0.7891593,0.0009481739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17220974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06387643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76730764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023987758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005611243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9532054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W122242722","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Peoples Tribal Self Government: Legal History and Public Policy Manifestations in Canada, New Zealand and the United States","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Sovereignty; Treaty; Government (linguistics); Politics; Colonialism; State (computer science); Public administration; Law; Indigenous rights; Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.008216530683902757,"score_gpt":0.23498168731177974,"score_spread":0.22676515662787697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W122242722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9359242,0.0073993444,0.0000068388035,0.05588573,0.000055303437,0.00019950124,0.0000050126087,0.000014840778,0.00050923094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95714796,0.03895065,0.00001456735,0.0005396539,0.00020680463,0.0000021311162,0.0000031893615,0.000005398992,0.003129649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754876,0.00027072066,0.0002097458,0.000127319,0.00046910287,0.0013743709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999379,0.00021652365,0.0001370376,0.000048265047,0.00005149506,0.00016768905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088302966,0.00012307335,0.00016268402,0.000058005407,0.00089475274,0.00011961936,0.00017150867,0.00004092621,0.000007668082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002800423,0.000084933294,0.000027870125,0.00023745802,0.0001631829,0.00025886024,0.000022638334,0.0007072113,4.798998e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016890824,0.00011529944,0.09856584,0.000007888284,0.00033155704,0.000034891804,0.3492687,0.000047865804,0.00000912549,0.5228119,0.0065641645,0.02207386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005104166,0.00025109987,0.3113429,0.000024139159,0.000093334274,0.0002571314,0.34691438,0.00008058612,0.0000011553007,0.050945304,0.2845037,0.00048212573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.984442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99791884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47186658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013964006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015800104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9898212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W122937521","doi":"","title":"Les recours judiciaires des personnes autistes pour la reconnaissance de leurs droits dans des services socio-sanitaires et d'éducation au Québec et au Canada","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue francophone de la déficience intellectuelle","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.03662648210457323,"score_gpt":0.30358970182719547,"score_spread":0.26696321972262227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W122937521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9269623,0.018170021,0.0010507293,0.021762297,0.0015605687,0.00040016402,0.00006248745,0.00015220272,0.029879222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98693395,0.0045159366,0.0026904275,0.00061875174,0.0007274695,0.000100146084,0.000008782505,0.00007624592,0.004328277],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942761,0.001963956,0.00066955906,0.00087180367,0.0006132435,0.0016053511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99462044,0.0037358871,0.0004646763,0.00032294285,0.00042218482,0.0004338789],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002528667,0.00065678527,0.00069817854,0.00010443257,0.0044521866,0.00029048513,0.0010280752,0.00047026706,0.00031401706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029459186,0.00067489466,0.00029087468,0.0013627014,0.005648565,0.00071991043,0.00016897409,0.0008524548,0.00009533358],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038189544,0.00033573044,0.13936014,0.0007541741,0.00011826681,0.00006954653,0.82131827,0.0072750384,0.0016418928,0.0055729304,0.0015814711,0.021934379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006428938,0.0001924058,0.3993058,0.003676962,0.00013281892,0.00018652581,0.5589498,0.0010282692,0.0027199625,0.010534525,0.02136828,0.0012617139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99839336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26236838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01686602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014147466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W123339044","doi":"10.29173/alr174","title":"Courting Confusion? Three Recent Alberta Cases on Equality Rights Post-Kapp","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Charter; Confusion; Political science; Prejudice (legal term); Sociology; Trial court; Economic Justice; Psychology","score_opus":0.054628161612341804,"score_gpt":0.36399043507164364,"score_spread":0.30936227345930184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W123339044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23132521,0.019023253,0.0000013140774,0.14326572,0.0023108209,0.0034896508,0.000023866858,0.00015462647,0.6004055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9466361,0.026245784,0.00017877996,0.017087875,0.0008544294,0.00018320992,0.000049167833,0.00003770623,0.008726994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971175,0.00043893608,0.00061757583,0.0005218502,0.0006699879,0.0006341275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99560255,0.0028323976,0.0003431544,0.0004892745,0.000433406,0.00029924748],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011782028,0.0003226961,0.0006575586,0.00001354242,0.0020928995,0.00011368958,0.00051782955,0.00017862295,0.0032173677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046881936,0.00021738341,0.00024034128,0.00027105396,0.00059108145,0.00025924083,0.0001534838,0.00047391327,0.0013346216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018046825,0.00020143398,0.0009655668,0.0004312896,0.00010923309,0.000012750928,0.0046883784,2.658126e-7,0.00015502048,0.97035646,0.009463521,0.013598008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017004217,0.00005060377,0.0007334674,0.0009316343,0.00010764211,0.000004585638,0.00013444215,0.0000016095775,0.00004828027,0.0006578832,0.99680644,0.0003533848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5947332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9131347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9873429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012791828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008978427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W123532963","doi":"10.29173/alr152","title":"“The Maverick Constitution” — A Review of &lt;i&gt;Canadian Maverick: The Life and Times of Ivan C. Rand&lt;/i&gt;, William Kaplan","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03706977055129678,"score_gpt":0.3074291791335268,"score_spread":0.27035940858223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W123532963","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.5542494e-7,0.8097594,2.6825114e-7,0.0024722416,0.00031160764,0.0036716594,0.00007395172,0.000015238099,0.18369551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000031292006,0.9936167,0.00004503023,0.0020231477,0.00017148371,0.0003134056,0.000049786715,0.00003198564,0.0037171533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943056,0.0018571386,0.0018646324,0.00056798116,0.0006515343,0.00075307733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99424905,0.0022502916,0.0016974848,0.00087501056,0.0004326751,0.0004954869],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027511895,0.00070189056,0.003775141,0.00003967592,0.0016752394,0.000070088216,0.0013863822,0.00031056048,0.0009768396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038233479,0.00035681968,0.0011235493,0.0008491614,0.0039623035,0.00019580558,0.00023882979,0.0003980874,0.00023892631],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030411832,0.000029915893,0.0000073867636,0.17968231,0.00080400205,0.0000032450198,0.0007570925,8.40187e-9,7.7209926e-8,0.5003759,0.08450745,0.23382953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087820496,0.000023515155,0.0000060471675,0.16498496,0.002309295,0.000011249316,0.000017193757,5.272813e-8,5.1194146e-8,0.00006129729,0.83213896,0.00035955026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.083336204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19503829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74763155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021457126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013198456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1237609878","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-17229-3_4","title":"Shifting Scrutiny: Private Ordering in Family Matters in Common-Law Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius comparatum","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Law; Political science; Family law; Private law; Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law","score_opus":0.07420934351758351,"score_gpt":0.3118252412727679,"score_spread":0.23761589775518438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1237609878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060827583,0.0028869177,0.0000011346584,0.004354305,0.0015382267,0.00078171946,0.0000356655,0.00009907318,0.92947537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9252289,0.00010995415,0.00019461376,0.0017372639,0.00030405645,0.0000309,0.000034182183,0.00006118159,0.07229893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971713,0.00012230611,0.0006402667,0.00046457045,0.0008429043,0.0007586675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990046,0.00017529613,0.00027681777,0.00023288689,0.00010983201,0.00020058159],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005704991,0.00042388108,0.000883956,0.00008422628,0.0004367307,0.00013248793,0.0005971571,0.0002773712,0.00006306987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037404727,0.0004233662,0.00007610677,0.00013551871,0.00041471663,0.00016100165,0.00028639624,0.00090134545,0.000063587235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007419113,0.00007215754,0.014824985,0.0001855281,0.00019885779,0.0007225671,0.037561525,0.0011256454,0.00003975359,0.71777296,0.22606057,0.0013612675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004328535,0.000011893057,0.0048040207,0.0005188509,0.000014844196,7.3482664e-7,0.002489438,0.00006241128,0.0000018737989,0.0055239415,0.98544264,0.00069652894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92980224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9928886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86440134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024204883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005365663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W12584622","doi":"10.4000/dictynna.216","title":"Women’s Networks in Vergil’s Aeneid","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dictynna","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principate; Elite; Politics; Context (archaeology); Relation (database); Latin Americans; Sociology; Gender studies; History; Literature; Political science; Art; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01639940661703336,"score_gpt":0.2735116099804253,"score_spread":0.2571122033633919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W12584622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89265203,0.0009225763,0.000029007993,0.0021537822,0.00044984173,0.00019449856,0.0000023624214,0.00012270776,0.103473164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953866,0.00017636486,0.000045958146,0.00020766155,0.0005613429,0.000062591396,0.00000357333,0.000007506631,0.0035484193],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987239,0.00010857904,0.00017290475,0.000181948,0.00027204514,0.0005406214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996727,0.000082109895,0.000047099053,0.00008497621,0.00004103913,0.00007206311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036969382,0.00010145531,0.00015925438,0.000029098072,0.00041768685,0.000055024982,0.00017435136,0.00009784885,0.00023244497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009552417,0.00008804734,0.000046929294,0.00030612233,0.00021564832,0.0001412801,0.000050340725,0.00013577876,0.000077047654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058331374,0.00040760086,0.69247776,0.00002114355,0.00006377132,0.00007681803,0.10750922,0.0031949459,0.00011673737,0.1080796,0.06889884,0.019095257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047106424,0.000021008005,0.50873333,0.000019601297,0.000004767543,1.8380607e-7,0.009629691,0.00019720776,0.000010511924,0.0017038492,0.47893864,0.0002701371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024744356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01936261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4100398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005621257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026783384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99853146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W127118925","doi":"","title":"Anglican-Roman Catholic Dialogue in Canada *","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of ecumenical studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bishops; Prayer; Pastoral care; Sociology; Religious studies; Law; History; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.058408187748116215,"score_gpt":0.3463875032787219,"score_spread":0.2879793155306057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W127118925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9783783,0.0083185565,9.712868e-7,0.0056500575,0.00072383974,0.00012675377,0.0000023057214,0.00000700727,0.006792218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960661,0.0028631804,0.00026492422,0.0003437616,0.00024996814,0.0000062343597,1.2611547e-7,0.0000063633556,0.00019935978],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772066,0.00044392783,0.0006040311,0.0001370462,0.0006476543,0.00044669904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984478,0.0006680693,0.0003009919,0.000077039345,0.0003241509,0.00018198282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011193398,0.00014554836,0.0005435405,0.000043378877,0.0004262251,0.000029189803,0.00024871968,0.000055351247,0.000049721417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004739633,0.00010241666,0.00012232637,0.00032635877,0.0003273519,0.0001911469,0.00005700731,0.00031802437,0.000004880659],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001114177,0.00047374476,0.67788005,0.00007514331,0.001389063,0.0010765091,0.18918802,0.00020763901,0.0003091231,0.04104697,0.081165925,0.00707639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015279708,0.00019024225,0.25523975,0.00014046379,0.00010419126,0.000022444863,0.12626469,0.0000013829264,0.0001688328,0.0033826614,0.61244863,0.0005087365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7187503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9846299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5312827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020906674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008131601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56741256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W12959246","doi":"","title":"A Perspective on Ontario’s Adult Guardianship Law: The Role of Law in Adjudicating Disputes Caused by Old Men Marrying Young Women.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Law; Autonomy; Battle; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Political science; Doctrine; History","score_opus":0.019131374444605675,"score_gpt":0.2671430305343135,"score_spread":0.24801165608970782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W12959246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.383093,0.00028701927,4.8740156e-7,0.0049855057,0.000042795808,0.00035981054,0.0000065865443,0.000045888275,0.6111789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920516,0.000061244384,0.000057657035,0.00056592585,0.00007263766,0.000116506206,0.0000010028784,0.000010182318,0.0070632533],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813837,0.00025003025,0.00025968876,0.00029940475,0.00053178816,0.00052074506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990714,0.00039515813,0.00012857953,0.00016157878,0.00015257993,0.00009068669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004880703,0.00016718025,0.00027391253,0.000020784404,0.0009283967,0.00008295194,0.0003285002,0.00009308742,0.00055609265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031470694,0.00011006359,0.00008405908,0.00021468829,0.00057721674,0.00022560352,0.00007492162,0.00029363742,0.000031603045],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007517511,0.00007456095,0.017943926,0.0000032104617,0.000053834847,0.000001049805,0.5930582,0.000003979127,0.00026050446,0.3876,0.0007294036,0.0002637624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007096693,0.0000958666,0.024733864,0.00008275461,0.00002456731,2.2822479e-7,0.95221424,0.0001152581,0.0007290119,0.0064684893,0.014442704,0.00038335868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.887909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83563507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6089586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021329648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021889737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7140571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W136203849","doi":"","title":"Sans Foi, Ni Loi. Appearances of Conjugality and Lawless Love","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"De facto; Structural functionalism; Sanctions; Cornerstone; Law; Coercion (linguistics); Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; History; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.039520949558615376,"score_gpt":0.3116475423654978,"score_spread":0.27212659280688245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W136203849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8464159,0.004016463,0.000017935348,0.0045032324,0.000537361,0.0004095664,0.00003635088,0.000081891376,0.14398134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963668,0.0002308522,0.000314933,0.00037910618,0.0003213694,0.000008333008,0.000002208336,0.00000887193,0.002367539],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982256,0.00026255197,0.00027636797,0.00028823456,0.000569322,0.00037788882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989504,0.00011339651,0.00014827344,0.00016983748,0.0002861199,0.00033195806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087012287,0.00015881669,0.00035538367,0.000014717881,0.00033682067,0.000099526966,0.00026463825,0.0001297159,0.00015256723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004874094,0.00012977338,0.00007212714,0.00018375895,0.0012557773,0.00039913462,0.000116218864,0.00018293782,0.0001816068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022781019,0.00038536187,0.32342845,0.00028444023,0.00038652672,0.000022554554,0.14041592,0.00004513195,0.0010029342,0.49714354,0.03302298,0.003634331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002570285,0.00021555038,0.087881975,0.00021857722,0.00011313965,0.0000023863133,0.09507103,0.000020621947,0.001750821,0.015180274,0.79602486,0.0009504931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056446973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043007035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76300186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012902173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095502444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9744556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W140235721","doi":"","title":"Le rôle de la volonté en matière d'adoption en droit français et en droit québécois","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Philosophy; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.009344705794648373,"score_gpt":0.2781490506837514,"score_spread":0.26880434488910304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W140235721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5951375,0.0018539918,0.0002760338,0.0062106876,0.00086997094,0.00088045426,0.00005756442,0.00028085968,0.39443296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8247918,0.0033801012,0.0020884809,0.00022865651,0.00083579984,0.00017527062,0.00024220417,0.00006374167,0.16819397],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99494135,0.0017517348,0.0007036438,0.00075338705,0.00097505946,0.0008748192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970889,0.0017243455,0.0003813581,0.0002580965,0.00028967834,0.00025762944],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015156429,0.00063183066,0.0008024595,0.000101580314,0.001432603,0.00027349783,0.0007261657,0.0015970024,0.002501968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000967751,0.0006276506,0.0004846202,0.0005190086,0.00048406218,0.0007098566,0.00010923587,0.0010259036,0.0014909911],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029977466,0.0003580409,0.006448925,0.00027048006,0.00037853332,0.00001873235,0.74124545,0.00010782754,0.0009204847,0.22781773,0.0044974913,0.017906357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094411935,0.00015092522,0.27773848,0.0003808156,0.00041666755,0.0000062704244,0.4682261,0.0007343754,0.0004919178,0.00490869,0.24441518,0.0015864501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7228148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5973768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2730193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016629788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004072897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W140593061","doi":"10.1007/978-3-531-92139-6_4","title":"“At the Mercy of a Putative Majority:” Difference as a ‘Problem’ in Canadian Political Theory","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Normative; Scholarship; Politics; Political philosophy; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Accommodation; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Environmental ethics; Positive economics; Gender studies; Political economy; Law; Philosophy; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.021521448562784835,"score_gpt":0.30544463114016374,"score_spread":0.2839231825773789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W140593061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006467552,0.00069560035,0.0000013242413,0.007297888,0.00027253374,0.001550493,0.0002164889,0.00007822363,0.9834199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41700077,0.00010685366,0.00010006313,0.0010258819,0.0003580557,0.000051688243,0.000023010058,0.000056559744,0.58127713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99488515,0.00053487887,0.00080366427,0.00077765435,0.0011164496,0.00188223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99679446,0.0009532941,0.00038834862,0.0005082192,0.00041326202,0.0009424197],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00148724,0.00071442017,0.001118867,0.00027557783,0.0011547295,0.000102834245,0.00078920805,0.0008838069,0.00049615855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007108981,0.00052674493,0.0004412524,0.00009447283,0.0027678886,0.00007499581,0.0002722748,0.0010257027,0.00027378974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011565001,0.000017595354,0.00012917294,0.000032558226,0.00015610417,0.00013508897,0.031027766,7.297622e-7,0.00006429554,0.96079123,0.00024100287,0.0072887805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083500426,0.0003338788,0.0038233409,0.00055786734,0.00034656955,0.000019386303,0.010000299,0.00000437448,0.00018700234,0.65640354,0.32606003,0.0014287245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71274406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.839732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41053322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027146381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016091284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W141895517","doi":"","title":"The Bible, Disability, and the Church: A New Vision of the People of God by Amos Yong (review)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"People of God; Theology; Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013585404163910488,"score_gpt":0.31094100952235176,"score_spread":0.2973556053584413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W141895517","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33631304,0.45938185,0.0002641599,0.17847694,0.0015027092,0.0011264434,0.000007682113,0.00001474808,0.022912439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.946821,0.05201871,0.000050115774,0.00017352981,0.00019978179,0.0000026822358,9.130146e-8,0.0000039102515,0.000730227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732065,0.0015829045,0.00045146456,0.00008619724,0.0003718649,0.00018692578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965708,0.0024875894,0.0005370056,0.00018145358,0.0001643563,0.000058790913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035508985,0.00009260708,0.00040657725,0.000005068475,0.0004843454,0.00001816612,0.000656168,0.00006156478,0.0002398445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020123317,0.00003347325,0.00020717713,0.00010788838,0.0024865025,0.00016856479,0.00017645014,0.00015144542,6.5102967e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008553208,0.00025684558,0.06829218,0.0004839481,0.0008861369,6.291104e-7,0.14716351,0.000020368769,0.0014462958,0.31792957,0.2321414,0.23052378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034331626,0.00083197566,0.4669641,0.0010462968,0.0006237747,0.000030924173,0.021722358,0.00010902883,0.00023438758,0.034530837,0.4701279,0.00034522545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02262887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029815817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6105079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009301316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054529653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9878875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1454189359","doi":"","title":"Сущность правоспособности человека","year":2015,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Пространство и Время","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.0967094047343371,"score_gpt":0.3559397100637263,"score_spread":0.25923030532938923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1454189359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29731193,0.019521475,0.000088153385,0.044400647,0.012839713,0.0024772624,0.00017128169,0.0011117832,0.62207776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91732645,0.0013527803,0.00087218365,0.0013994371,0.004295464,0.00010273233,0.000029454497,0.00009689844,0.0745246],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99261934,0.0008256301,0.0010417844,0.0012123261,0.0022641583,0.002036743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99582094,0.00038008898,0.00055469136,0.0007504393,0.00096906914,0.0015247739],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020622371,0.0008568402,0.001096903,0.00012888631,0.0017908096,0.0005434143,0.0014004942,0.0007492237,0.0015757766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023256307,0.00074469676,0.00053180696,0.0012899168,0.0016014136,0.0009894919,0.0006933212,0.0008989333,0.009143046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023229736,0.0009385578,0.029648302,0.000185607,0.00082850736,0.00020560776,0.2662634,0.00009867863,0.0003068897,0.046965417,0.623107,0.0312197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001575098,0.00027663299,0.009345531,0.00013660031,0.00022446948,0.000006306494,0.064130865,0.0001234688,0.00018349769,0.0025148334,0.92025805,0.0012246299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02160692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056436374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62001455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013280466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074347906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1478234144","doi":"10.1017/s0731126500011574","title":"Aboriginal Rights in Canada: The Historical and Constitutional Contex†","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Information","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.011564853952167713,"score_gpt":0.27976600153279607,"score_spread":0.26820114758062835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1478234144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87734497,0.00031229574,0.0009726691,0.08641512,0.0042381156,0.00032035468,0.000011858671,0.000010305129,0.03037432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988198,0.00007872076,0.0001274039,0.00053915236,0.00029007386,0.000004680515,0.0000018061389,5.9404823e-7,0.00013775603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864626,0.000056735236,0.00041195872,0.00003212904,0.00073894486,0.00011398171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986623,0.00014428496,0.00027618432,0.000023073379,0.0008302131,0.00006396313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032175414,0.00005893248,0.00009955889,0.00006113528,0.00020671824,0.00017054526,0.00023003675,0.000028618952,0.00010637538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016216541,0.000036562335,0.000031599542,0.000068814734,0.00035378855,0.0025722592,0.000013582073,0.00019281429,0.000011713412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058223857,0.000031994005,0.03710628,0.0000052665055,0.0001187086,0.00002325443,0.015567735,0.00025604904,0.000020084952,0.8685958,0.07213674,0.0060799005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039327703,0.000012287642,0.060809873,0.00002364,0.000004764028,0.0000316198,0.0020090772,0.00013393737,0.000009191263,0.00073386205,0.9357755,0.00006293266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.920608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6659859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8678619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030274128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009246709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7916579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1478590537","doi":"","title":"Introduction to: The Dignity of Law: The Legacy of Justice Louis LeBel","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Supreme court; Political science; Economic Justice; Ideology; Dignity; Politics; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.03090613688318201,"score_gpt":0.31617122611205795,"score_spread":0.28526508922887595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1478590537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73470503,0.0072841044,0.0011993661,0.23034386,0.002303825,0.0007218554,0.0000048481975,0.000040364448,0.023396747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946408,0.00089975167,0.000038337825,0.00013751963,0.0026356045,0.0000042220486,3.6162956e-7,0.0000055638043,0.0016378133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977539,0.00040459487,0.00025113754,0.00010794623,0.0005948442,0.0008875359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890804,0.00014555818,0.00022901954,0.00014068325,0.0005020538,0.00007466829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004587153,0.000087933244,0.00015922204,0.000017571674,0.00096562953,0.00006826667,0.00047382133,0.000045817054,0.00001789477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013346584,0.000044334192,0.00009212257,0.00026374977,0.00043163815,0.00027111438,0.000065687425,0.0008130988,0.000019401448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000686487,0.00007288139,0.00030334035,0.000006753231,0.00017907379,2.2675007e-7,0.05235705,0.00021787525,0.00025485273,0.9295759,0.009166441,0.0077969185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063941814,0.00051377015,0.0017731002,0.000020524561,0.00035992506,0.000027980917,0.3783742,0.000015147792,0.0005779986,0.10379532,0.51367533,0.00022727065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012451351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028425086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82578063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073993806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087043043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480104160","doi":"","title":"The Covenanters in Canada: Reformed Presbyterianism from 1820 to 2012 by Eldon Hay (review)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hay; Theology; Philosophy; Animal science; Biology","score_opus":0.011117849865169185,"score_gpt":0.2740857521529374,"score_spread":0.26296790228776823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480104160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42998043,0.30525127,0.00027327228,0.18898341,0.008044219,0.0013288294,0.000052130523,0.000029573674,0.06605685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686121,0.025156379,0.00017526264,0.003356827,0.0004544248,0.000011339439,0.0000010994155,0.000008875064,0.0022237285],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980946,0.000682067,0.00042468004,0.00010631147,0.00031676996,0.00037556415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987804,0.0005115145,0.0003128105,0.00011875813,0.00011801933,0.00015847186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011792284,0.00010868965,0.000357944,0.0000066745524,0.00028414704,0.000015909833,0.0005875384,0.0000560907,0.00047635016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008758041,0.00005995208,0.00006725291,0.00003502087,0.00016156578,0.00021474813,0.00007972562,0.00014598973,0.000009564802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033126923,0.00005883351,0.0060393177,0.000029482953,0.00027525617,0.000019582068,0.022679973,0.000010707836,0.0011819252,0.008156541,0.9071593,0.05405777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037620674,0.000111268,0.02273091,0.00015568227,0.000030171717,0.0000027408664,0.004003566,0.0000032538032,0.00006155464,0.0008989564,0.9714926,0.00013312862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5386316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017476669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028165223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480693685","doi":"10.21991/cf29363","title":"McIvor v. Canada and the 2010 Amendments to the Indian Act: A Half-Hearted Remedy to Historical Injustice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Injustice; Indigenous; Plaintiff; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Inheritance (genetic algorithm)","score_opus":0.022561630482639816,"score_gpt":0.2761986025802654,"score_spread":0.2536369720976256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480693685","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.073518254,0.0011981411,0.0086735,0.8527468,0.014613924,0.004882788,0.00033007545,0.00025137173,0.043785162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837052,0.000046244513,0.00049652916,0.012267959,0.0007541599,0.00023438808,0.000011905883,0.00000744779,0.0024761166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967818,0.00024339514,0.00046648798,0.00051015225,0.00102924,0.00096891914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977871,0.000548999,0.00013981809,0.00033195355,0.0006269788,0.00056514237],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090083404,0.00030507098,0.00034969908,0.00008497132,0.008354022,0.00020703014,0.00062567345,0.00014492481,0.00016631612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034446423,0.00018931279,0.00010542503,0.00069274724,0.0084161395,0.00032703584,0.0003967794,0.000349627,0.00023740686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014622144,0.000033970828,0.0037713568,0.000005571335,0.00008897047,0.000009619699,0.005957392,0.000040309737,0.00003620761,0.7905126,0.19856796,0.00082981866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097608136,0.00005345366,0.002477281,0.000059204864,0.000072398754,0.000027623508,0.013472935,0.000029526705,0.000025708194,0.0011309126,0.9813364,0.00033843447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69077826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93450314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.910187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002358942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028447802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99428236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1481688350","doi":"10.7202/010265ar","title":"L’union de fait au Québec : inexistence dans le Code civil","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Civil code; Art; Law","score_opus":0.01536078176300917,"score_gpt":0.2538776298749263,"score_spread":0.23851684811191712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1481688350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84590036,0.02738327,0.0018827978,0.08608187,0.001406462,0.00059174385,0.00008724459,0.00033078532,0.036335487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825041,0.006195557,0.0015721896,0.0015202517,0.0008589941,0.00010270129,0.000013033561,0.000065921515,0.0071672155],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99527675,0.0007586488,0.00059033994,0.0007760289,0.0007112199,0.0018869853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781764,0.00027885567,0.0003283353,0.00045237946,0.0002579619,0.00086480414],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013511064,0.00059511664,0.0006214848,0.00019120594,0.0038699417,0.0001575714,0.00096614583,0.0007996369,0.00010753037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007267988,0.00060930493,0.00066294,0.0022082292,0.009808504,0.0006272798,0.00013315621,0.0009874984,0.000109527966],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041216765,0.0005806586,0.06412916,0.00022628275,0.00054505526,0.0001948572,0.70255053,0.00053472404,0.00214788,0.21146575,0.008324586,0.009259277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019761398,0.00032215714,0.14319019,0.000518614,0.0004481315,0.000059105594,0.28239486,0.00005918404,0.0012542187,0.010187948,0.55785793,0.0017315078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9649372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99019337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54953337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007988134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004512928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483016405","doi":"","title":"The British North America Act and the Protection of Individual Rights: The Canadian Bill of Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ValpoScholar (Valparaiso University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Political science; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.029340698577219673,"score_gpt":0.21671852298845154,"score_spread":0.18737782441123185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483016405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9449125,0.0004069188,0.0000081990665,0.0021233635,0.00018397362,0.0010371222,0.00003887933,0.000032508877,0.05125652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99848014,0.00022685545,0.00006471399,0.000034941182,0.00004107829,0.0000031723064,0.000001584563,0.0000042287875,0.0011432829],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822646,0.0007118369,0.00016013179,0.0001811684,0.00042026085,0.00030014708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899805,0.0002297742,0.00022094352,0.00018810047,0.00024860346,0.000114523114],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067349256,0.00011128937,0.00018979194,0.00005801677,0.008227998,0.00019077444,0.00073645054,0.00008807337,0.000031499232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020050716,0.000055033328,0.00011312116,0.0006898436,0.0030225525,0.0003562222,0.000116657466,0.00031372064,0.000006120562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094133685,0.0003842644,0.07997499,0.00005407516,0.0028446224,0.000111747795,0.7168854,0.000036326324,0.000071420895,0.15745503,0.006232008,0.035008777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008969872,0.000091243055,0.17558359,0.000027805483,0.00020230869,0.0000031715988,0.012497782,0.000009875639,0.00009108857,0.0020932339,0.80830157,0.00020137649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94158113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94814295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80206954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001361749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015418239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483023927","doi":"10.22201/cisan.24487228e.2007.02.80","title":"North American Convergence, Revisited","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013660880786750054,"score_gpt":0.2894770806268748,"score_spread":0.2758161998401248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483023927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90084124,0.00009642108,0.0002424838,0.0008720794,0.00015987824,0.00020003472,0.000014217793,0.00015994866,0.097413674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99471754,0.00036851468,0.0008308688,0.00032530574,0.00030044944,0.0000020477055,0.000012380583,0.000010558565,0.0034323218],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831295,0.0002782275,0.00014102667,0.0002588269,0.00040582367,0.0006031728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882615,0.0004607987,0.00014481175,0.00014525693,0.00013781038,0.00028515756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000774172,0.0001471252,0.00023956642,0.00010043951,0.00088858476,0.00007283713,0.0003478408,0.000091461705,0.00036846648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031993425,0.0001485598,0.00011636035,0.0011950396,0.0012144009,0.00025964912,0.00008093842,0.00021884227,0.00022457306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008468875,0.000090875285,0.8354628,0.000016033338,0.00014333223,0.00022334831,0.068525285,0.000012698777,0.00018921579,0.051280603,0.022938568,0.021032566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020751469,0.000024685338,0.6347366,0.000006424196,0.000026183474,7.416254e-7,0.013938236,0.000007853232,0.000017425238,0.00008719989,0.3507524,0.00019475604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024302945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041144896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32781383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004330739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000748569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9821943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483387903","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Peoples and the Law - Ancient Customs: Modern Dilemmas","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Political science; Indigenous rights; International law; Human rights; Ecology","score_opus":0.02116207358008191,"score_gpt":0.28498214808666983,"score_spread":0.2638200745065879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483387903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81040514,0.0026319902,0.000056832105,0.016355235,0.000113882896,0.0005397923,0.0000024873568,0.00013996582,0.16975467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943211,0.0005433502,0.00015290895,0.0022445214,0.00013951336,0.00001188889,6.193941e-7,0.000002834068,0.0025832374],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989513,0.00012107993,0.00011675909,0.00016130571,0.00032421795,0.00032529535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953234,0.0001934084,0.000041283172,0.000090292924,0.000061417304,0.000081246995],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004408142,0.00009454494,0.00014849278,0.000008593466,0.0019711682,0.00013860266,0.00017536813,0.00005331468,0.00005129992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013102728,0.00004856586,0.000052506017,0.00010820707,0.00082362344,0.00015148104,0.000046599296,0.000086083564,0.000026266149],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017701472,0.00003880294,0.0008043774,0.0000030332599,0.000020065565,0.0000018216109,0.5097438,0.000008136844,0.000043940963,0.47859827,0.0013577348,0.009362295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036554236,0.00019591533,0.11862628,0.000045959016,0.00014370515,0.0000057366897,0.29959744,0.00037616005,0.00023146428,0.04953023,0.52649814,0.001093559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02512028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035448898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5251404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000776235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003453735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485315654","doi":"10.21991/c9908s","title":"CONSTITUTIONALIZING THE PATRIARCHY: ABORIGINAL WOMEN AND ABORIGINAL GOVERNMENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Patriarchy; Government (linguistics); Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028147571320146187,"score_gpt":0.3002645235946371,"score_spread":0.27211695227449095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485315654","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20422845,0.00589546,0.02704768,0.027887156,0.00647592,0.0033202781,0.0010065477,0.00078736467,0.7233511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99457216,0.0009450476,0.0015569727,0.0012883703,0.000422451,0.00031426697,0.000018061439,0.000010184573,0.0008724635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957633,0.00024909794,0.00061204395,0.00064411695,0.0013949022,0.0013365621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981345,0.00038887357,0.00026976687,0.00030360318,0.00041073584,0.0004925141],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001187883,0.00044290104,0.00041783985,0.00007568471,0.007269979,0.00022314506,0.0005746153,0.00022687414,0.00081479404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005057835,0.0003326283,0.000191937,0.00044477067,0.024792269,0.0010076583,0.00016069096,0.0004810303,0.00018395932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009807537,0.00009755418,0.04790859,0.000012577652,0.00016098816,0.000029569866,0.006585787,0.000017689636,0.000039318147,0.94182557,0.002321969,0.00090233114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012201027,0.000063830325,0.0057076765,0.000081856175,0.00007513392,0.00010584042,0.03375897,0.0000346309,0.000059258957,0.03231275,0.9259837,0.00059624447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002877652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015059095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9236617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014344236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024436803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485624013","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.16985311","title":"Recognising Non-Conjugal Relationships in New Zealand: Should We Extend the Rights and Responsibilities of Marriage and Marriage-Like Relationships to Other Caring Relationships?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Interdependence; Sexual relationship; Social psychology; Marital relationship; Psychology; Gender studies; Sociology; Human sexuality; Political science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.08105041365163404,"score_gpt":0.3361863285717185,"score_spread":0.2551359149200845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485624013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9514953,0.0010357961,0.000019158393,0.005237297,0.00076160225,0.0017953339,0.00003621465,0.00007881084,0.039540514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82527107,0.00019773623,0.002451392,0.000049780032,0.00030510986,0.000069662965,0.000049732138,0.00004429436,0.17156123],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956621,0.0015784177,0.0009120835,0.0006920199,0.00066582154,0.0004895905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936959,0.004963671,0.00043072825,0.0003772332,0.00025950815,0.0002729673],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004299356,0.00042831138,0.00060020975,0.0003571206,0.002954402,0.00028643437,0.00030624977,0.0009792458,0.00019398356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004961346,0.0003126076,0.000112607966,0.0006259707,0.0004157804,0.00055229035,0.00009506139,0.0023288296,0.000018219198],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004638363,0.00005752304,0.20357493,0.00015398643,0.00016393974,0.0000070077845,0.7522706,0.000030309726,0.00037471403,0.03356175,0.0068205437,0.002520902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007457168,0.0000506557,0.76573795,0.000767972,0.0002027206,0.0000029349133,0.15619856,0.000044004624,0.00010913208,0.044797074,0.030589199,0.0007540855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07253688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71384275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64130586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020803857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003183672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W148650106","doi":"10.21991/c98d5g","title":"THE HARD CASE OF DEFINING “THE MÉTIS PEOPLE” AND THEIR RIGHTS: A COMMENT ON R. V. POWLEY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Treaty; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Task (project management); Constitutional law; Business; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.036990190960873595,"score_gpt":0.2787448181654569,"score_spread":0.2417546272045833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W148650106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21869192,0.01755015,0.016431298,0.27632448,0.0080947345,0.0057692914,0.0017985961,0.0006565729,0.45468295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976883,0.00027076126,0.00037343457,0.0013003096,0.000072328985,0.000112192356,0.000011733624,0.000005185968,0.00016574834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978498,0.00024419153,0.00048049487,0.00033924356,0.0003716342,0.0007145939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978943,0.0010366363,0.00025134248,0.00028619135,0.00035500576,0.00017656077],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009425232,0.0002848296,0.00031019698,0.000057226647,0.011436845,0.0001121792,0.00038762137,0.00013800261,0.00009975219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007049036,0.00015205774,0.00019136332,0.00029274393,0.014429413,0.0003162347,0.0002485002,0.00029809447,0.000068677604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050277973,0.00006912864,0.005946871,0.000006058291,0.0001290098,0.000023840224,0.0068210117,0.000009639827,0.0000076028887,0.9795869,0.0063333735,0.0010162657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013743697,0.00016766066,0.0040761735,0.00022507114,0.00011726249,0.00060776895,0.11766507,0.00013246396,0.00028937467,0.049794775,0.82494557,0.0006044275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010903195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018124258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92979217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023521844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042519605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487492807","doi":"","title":"Equality & Incrementalism: The Role of Common Law Reasoning in Constitutional Rights Cases","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Charter; Law; Constitutionality; Incrementalism; Political science; Common law; Constitutional law; Substantive due process; Supreme court; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01867545833179055,"score_gpt":0.30623375121270685,"score_spread":0.2875582928809163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1487492807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9567472,0.0035117755,0.00001673677,0.001842145,0.000095126736,0.0002639366,0.000003200912,0.000015312626,0.037504572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905515,0.0004653726,0.000031943306,0.000084986925,0.00016494017,0.000012172653,0.0000016301723,0.0000026247894,0.00018115988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976004,0.0004805609,0.00029527742,0.0001043406,0.00044129134,0.0010781534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993356,0.00023223527,0.00018074384,0.00007053838,0.00012599498,0.000054902488],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021776368,0.0000958429,0.00017480832,0.00002164912,0.001387586,0.000068651585,0.00028091486,0.000058746053,0.00012651925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011971064,0.000059337497,0.00007939112,0.00014812149,0.0012888877,0.0003462453,0.00005244441,0.00080213265,0.000018550309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070629594,0.00004400749,0.014872736,9.4907085e-7,0.00004859264,9.1996003e-7,0.0048574926,0.0000063252637,0.00012493467,0.9792991,0.000035449855,0.0007024036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053890655,0.00008809344,0.009754592,0.000055743167,0.000031246,0.00006633477,0.11054217,0.00002492018,0.0003575747,0.86136687,0.01696641,0.00020714836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.241449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2738725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11793227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012326732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054410513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488242185","doi":"","title":"D.B.S. v. S.R.G.: Promoting Women's Equality through the Automatic Recalculation of Child Support","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Child support; Charter; Appeal; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Legislature; Political science; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Lawmaking; Family law; Equity (law); Sociology","score_opus":0.027027290000685083,"score_gpt":0.31183359763010565,"score_spread":0.28480630762942055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488242185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761455,0.00068817765,0.00022494179,0.01334337,0.00017329214,0.00032911502,0.0000011584784,0.00006186053,0.009032569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99646825,0.0016377899,0.00006724864,0.00017857939,0.00035552564,0.000013574091,9.239268e-7,0.000009793381,0.0012683306],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964305,0.0005124819,0.00044029445,0.0001471702,0.00069774134,0.0017717957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991128,0.00010994678,0.00042302944,0.000117904805,0.00017304161,0.00006330832],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038563511,0.00012834101,0.0002319032,0.000020462081,0.0026981104,0.00003561903,0.00033776255,0.00008094893,0.00012439815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056929025,0.00008100479,0.0001404393,0.0002999025,0.00045044778,0.00038366966,0.000047646277,0.0010166295,0.000016761052],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024823086,0.00023155691,0.011464531,0.00003447301,0.00053625484,0.0000043566242,0.7200684,0.000046869573,0.00010143829,0.2392067,0.0005533725,0.027727218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002548371,0.0011294561,0.09734222,0.00018813115,0.00019595084,0.0005759287,0.46224225,0.0003816442,0.00028145377,0.3551258,0.07884274,0.0011460269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012514234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012743459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25782615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016716608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010428668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99860024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1490829653","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1149","title":"Bruker v. Marcovitz: Divorce and the Marriage of Law and Religion","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Economic Justice; Free Exercise Clause; Judaism; Sociology; First amendment","score_opus":0.037822127731152407,"score_gpt":0.3085275067277466,"score_spread":0.2707053789965942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1490829653","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029518347,0.7177182,0.0000070445412,0.043205652,0.00022017346,0.0020084197,0.000013776834,0.000077748446,0.20723066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5547394,0.44103616,0.00010142771,0.0033660324,0.000078879675,0.000026170841,0.0000013904819,0.000006552916,0.00064395386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985352,0.00040802633,0.0002811809,0.00019762378,0.00036051724,0.00021741223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919987,0.00029931296,0.00012500917,0.00016989018,0.00012600048,0.000079893165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010376711,0.00012933834,0.00043536848,0.000005177379,0.0009863137,0.000024413006,0.00016926152,0.000057550602,0.000066636436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028591763,0.00007444573,0.00009712592,0.00010469566,0.0027008615,0.00016184508,0.00013798662,0.000116522584,0.00001286256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018630264,0.00001715623,0.0009094323,0.0008415435,0.000052282343,0.0000054581337,0.006200322,8.282712e-8,0.000024758565,0.9804714,0.010611834,0.0008471168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042047712,0.000015872101,0.0011189459,0.0007981164,0.00009366195,0.000006635399,0.00015315204,0.0000013384199,0.000013038705,0.002132552,0.99511373,0.00013246626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024611108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047135046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9845019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003249015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020668293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99514365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492053074","doi":"","title":"A Colonial Reading of Recent Jurisprudence: Sparrow, Delgamuukw and Haida Nation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Supreme court; Sovereignty; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Vision; Narrative; Denial; Politics; Sociology; Anthropology; Art","score_opus":0.03082915170291123,"score_gpt":0.3141191444428152,"score_spread":0.28328999273990396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492053074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94990325,0.0012989299,0.000025329498,0.01434686,0.00038367516,0.0004359953,0.000009422502,0.00010780505,0.033488717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940907,0.001214054,0.0024848606,0.0003086567,0.0006516805,0.000026160355,0.000002773662,0.000009261145,0.0012118551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984461,0.00016115824,0.000280511,0.00025541763,0.00052138563,0.0003354011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991678,0.00014812585,0.0001555105,0.000110483044,0.00024010408,0.0001779516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006494565,0.00012968938,0.00022843985,0.000027753198,0.00079238793,0.00009710321,0.00018616888,0.00013449608,0.0003486087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063734554,0.00011653011,0.00005260425,0.00024026146,0.00045372653,0.00049507315,0.00007847434,0.00017997838,0.00007109483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002604327,0.00044285416,0.08632817,0.00014640362,0.00029139334,0.00001766875,0.11101168,0.00014843167,0.013346648,0.6808275,0.022885362,0.084293455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075943215,0.00008453752,0.018159635,0.00008184205,0.00004718945,0.000001715636,0.0032365983,0.000066995075,0.0035096016,0.0017541337,0.9719474,0.00035093547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017392691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03801124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94906205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000358028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007933068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9891506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492178389","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1057","title":"Old and Difficult Grievances: Examining the Relationship Between the Métis and the Crown","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Biotech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Law; Crown (dentistry); Happening; Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; Accommodation; History; Psychology; Performance art; Medicine; Archaeology","score_opus":0.09662400643991144,"score_gpt":0.33916711180796166,"score_spread":0.24254310536805024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492178389","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1770864,0.52091473,0.00003525134,0.28305513,0.00027648307,0.0032039317,0.000019179846,0.000121789504,0.015287143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.928802,0.06806849,0.000058107802,0.0022558717,0.00027856402,0.000086867825,0.0000023276302,0.000007719726,0.00044001197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811643,0.0006611174,0.00028921728,0.00022284611,0.00041145252,0.0002989209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966952,0.0027473082,0.00014760844,0.00023194907,0.00011318499,0.00006474767],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002679104,0.00015645205,0.00031619568,0.0000041169337,0.0038008243,0.00019580983,0.00035512232,0.00005927003,0.000023196446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021961136,0.000059593083,0.00006979945,0.00022410152,0.0024610725,0.00021000081,0.00015335462,0.00029501523,0.000018677203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006817725,0.000010476701,0.045033775,0.000351705,0.00009521042,0.0000012466961,0.032930296,0.0000024067922,0.0000014728384,0.9145197,0.001984104,0.0050627603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066437386,0.000020985932,0.31345302,0.001695527,0.00037031723,0.0000032134517,0.004950634,6.9925915e-7,0.0000017750492,0.010597192,0.6680069,0.00023537102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051690103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052272254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90392256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068150264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031513406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99749607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496416790","doi":"","title":"Is it in force? 2002 : a guide to the commencement of statutes passed since 1st January 1977 : (incorporating Statutes Not Yet In Force)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Entomology and Zoology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Synod; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Statute of limitations; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04562816419820226,"score_gpt":0.34277757524697716,"score_spread":0.2971494110487749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496416790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68771684,0.0013335124,0.00029192131,0.29886228,0.00044161602,0.0007473628,0.000017926017,0.000024216297,0.010564328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98613274,0.00071207073,0.00037714184,0.009695067,0.0000616922,0.000079557285,0.000003936398,0.000004955534,0.0029328526],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735373,0.0006802003,0.0005931125,0.00033092714,0.00043853352,0.00060350815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981427,0.0013187248,0.00015778902,0.00013633222,0.00007294571,0.00017150865],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016394589,0.00016248046,0.00043763698,0.000086374996,0.0003105586,0.00001416549,0.00037778448,0.00027927716,0.0009921662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002052213,0.00011244822,0.00004583215,0.0003514514,0.0014157356,0.00009342617,0.00025818808,0.00037580956,0.000030524992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022515537,0.00073354726,0.5231281,0.00011951558,0.00017325013,0.0003636476,0.29024422,0.000059921054,0.00032951418,0.06675562,0.08467744,0.033190053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01289785,0.0033495848,0.52179176,0.0010364344,0.0001791183,0.00007414461,0.16859597,0.012175226,0.0009549804,0.028419817,0.24837562,0.0021494776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026585996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10320579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29841587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012127732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007599096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497485189","doi":"10.20381/ruor-19922","title":"The sacramental seal of confession from the Canadian civil law perspective","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"uO Research (University of Ottawa)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confession (law); Perspective (graphical); Law; Seal (emblem); Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Public law; History; Art; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06584671008831361,"score_gpt":0.36469829122743,"score_spread":0.2988515811391164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497485189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34082422,0.00057597464,2.2109732e-7,0.014847754,0.0002978929,0.00076618604,0.0002628815,0.000016121425,0.6424088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97183776,0.0014703195,0.00002627316,0.00001661874,0.000112312315,0.00000119189,0.00009472206,0.00000806267,0.026432754],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679863,0.0008140383,0.000113049246,0.00025871335,0.0015303093,0.00048526016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997075,0.0009980188,0.0001655774,0.00020515537,0.0013581723,0.0001980719],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096985843,0.00012198858,0.00023597115,0.00007045197,0.009480516,0.00006195619,0.0010768627,0.00027237952,0.0003592283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004471736,0.000088476845,0.00016397968,0.00036636624,0.0032694817,0.00015655771,0.00010485912,0.0007482589,0.00003217561],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004561797,0.000069189824,0.0087990975,0.000024361689,0.00040551453,0.000038152662,0.4681436,0.0000012930668,0.00018302204,0.46302545,0.057992656,0.0012720323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001954659,0.000038620154,0.073401816,0.00006299431,0.000021859994,9.133322e-8,0.7015887,0.0000036409856,0.000046882764,0.00078207866,0.22376058,0.000097302735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9739087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6310136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015909047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013260124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497674929","doi":"","title":"Oorwin negatiewe gedagtes : uit die Woord","year":2005,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Die Kerkblad","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03638166203112332,"score_gpt":0.3162884484199591,"score_spread":0.2799067863888358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497674929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64033633,0.04665005,0.000036102603,0.0835901,0.0032667906,0.0028045205,0.0002754134,0.0008079485,0.22223276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9327723,0.004410263,0.0010548555,0.0012862461,0.0046834173,0.0001689264,0.000036481877,0.00006746627,0.05552008],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950516,0.0004345438,0.0008369257,0.0008604665,0.001247521,0.001568916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779314,0.00057551276,0.00040712653,0.00045231526,0.0003593045,0.00041258283],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069965865,0.00066129834,0.00082220015,0.00007576223,0.0023272731,0.00048330607,0.0008972857,0.00043022167,0.0014044064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093026686,0.0005636682,0.00047300415,0.00044681574,0.0012621034,0.0007831064,0.00040282457,0.00061816303,0.0041273017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010535614,0.0012246127,0.021742145,0.00025184898,0.00092781294,0.00010487594,0.20826812,0.00019549714,0.00077585527,0.0068544503,0.27519804,0.48435137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000746038,0.000106455554,0.03693814,0.00017487182,0.00015435455,6.8509297e-7,0.01609423,0.00014739716,0.00052871276,0.00047482937,0.9437346,0.00089971727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022947147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034418266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66853654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077162654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014222966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498532345","doi":"","title":"MEETING POINTS BETWEEN THE TRADITIONS OF ENGLISH–AMERICAN COMMON LAW AND CONTINENTAL-FRENCH CIVIL LAW. Developments and the experience of postmodernity in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Supreme court; Multiculturalism; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Comparative law; Sociology; Public law","score_opus":0.03298547501506394,"score_gpt":0.2771350715746441,"score_spread":0.24414959655958018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498532345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854852,0.0029224097,0.000019407658,0.004451943,0.0005130226,0.0009650011,0.0001467622,0.000029216615,0.005467023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969111,0.002490864,0.000046035406,0.00025395147,0.00015851659,0.00010479372,0.000011261111,0.00001734953,0.0000061091946],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99590045,0.0013270656,0.0008955981,0.000402307,0.0008664914,0.00060806755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99673283,0.0017404329,0.00065305305,0.0003376683,0.0003181544,0.000217839],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018068214,0.000339373,0.0007588771,0.000035548423,0.0014611186,0.000058549,0.00090752286,0.00008353451,0.000020213562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006661142,0.00018914013,0.0001300427,0.00039120216,0.007153546,0.0002489022,0.00030231982,0.0007107702,6.792043e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022906825,0.0005273996,0.18817654,0.0002014625,0.00032813248,0.000006308726,0.63390577,0.00000295957,0.0000833309,0.17138538,0.0013195166,0.0038341477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0064826338,0.00019205791,0.7244377,0.001291347,0.00049805,0.000009252376,0.10436473,0.00007366547,0.0060900827,0.011455759,0.1434801,0.001624621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88780725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90339303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53626114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020293774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009825903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502653743","doi":"10.1300/j396v22n02_04","title":"The Regulation of Fee and Comparative Advertising","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Services Marketing Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Charter; Promotion (chess); Advertising; Law; Business; Political science; Public relations","score_opus":0.021594185110758904,"score_gpt":0.29734298326547853,"score_spread":0.27574879815471964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502653743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96211094,0.0009103811,0.0000049412247,0.0017868637,0.000112808,0.00017143166,8.4665135e-7,0.000037864716,0.034863953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99883235,0.0001294745,0.00018475493,0.000041228675,0.0001041753,0.0000050300528,0.0000011464875,0.0000029519915,0.00069891807],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874294,0.00046521632,0.0001935748,0.00013264954,0.00025955858,0.00020606004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884444,0.0007158503,0.00016976903,0.00008148932,0.00014717781,0.000041254956],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011509992,0.00007976612,0.00012903889,0.000013228234,0.0013048234,0.00010358875,0.0001419021,0.00004147227,0.000019483163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004503494,0.000054794695,0.000031377676,0.00015848258,0.00024713055,0.00022787428,0.000019233841,0.00006205013,0.0000047001236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041840703,0.000051824863,0.13515536,0.00017516158,0.00015173545,0.0000015501934,0.6516747,0.000011995475,0.0028461437,0.008053124,0.0005069226,0.20095307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017931857,0.000048426988,0.79164654,0.0001099487,0.000016608421,5.7782495e-7,0.17109926,0.00039092117,0.000016622005,0.00054301874,0.035840668,0.0001080897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042541767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01379476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65649116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003968674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001048419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502708317","doi":"","title":"The \"trickle is worth noting\": Common Law and Consumerism in Early Newfoundland History","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Érudit (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Consumerism; Environmental ethics; TRICKLE; Law; History; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010161994371923734,"score_gpt":0.19915696515249856,"score_spread":0.18899497078057484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502708317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8893955,0.03719782,0.0000021743267,0.044961482,0.00012858264,0.0002192892,0.0000042213273,0.00006219923,0.02802875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.967505,0.0060816603,0.00014140748,0.00075031543,0.00010285326,0.000004080245,0.0000010786847,0.000008553438,0.025405066],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989473,0.00012522984,0.0001178087,0.00019211204,0.00024678322,0.00037076438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993691,0.00024545845,0.00009440031,0.00012042736,0.000047688278,0.00012296811],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002784621,0.000118057076,0.00016901057,0.000032017397,0.0018624119,0.000035878817,0.00021529025,0.00009865778,0.000044732533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033751527,0.0000991175,0.000054906875,0.00014284559,0.0005677465,0.00022506635,0.00014246999,0.00018514726,0.000042888812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019669782,0.0001200191,0.31493977,0.000017022603,0.0001987509,0.00032234623,0.2515632,0.000027774111,0.00008525682,0.19855939,0.14621045,0.08775935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043762612,0.000014999774,0.045955393,0.00000851551,0.000020422132,0.0000030133806,0.0044201408,0.00003899402,0.000002337109,0.00020623393,0.9487583,0.00013404294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37788668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93721545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8025478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008682682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003015896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506191565","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1163","title":"The Silence of Section 15: Searching for Equality at the Supreme Court of Canada in 2007","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Section (typography); High Court; Citizenship; Immigration; Sociology; Politics; Business","score_opus":0.07990553910565779,"score_gpt":0.3539335472085003,"score_spread":0.2740280081028425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1506191565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49041852,0.37993717,0.000097241,0.0713147,0.0023176984,0.009209256,0.00027938443,0.00007827198,0.046347752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93115944,0.06629541,0.0000619202,0.00054273853,0.00017599632,0.00010342083,0.000004999208,0.000009684228,0.0016464156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973205,0.00067595317,0.00055001647,0.00020061954,0.00082439196,0.00042852145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977255,0.0012513654,0.00027727045,0.00025751427,0.0004195386,0.00006883049],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037750644,0.00013170386,0.00040584413,0.000006893372,0.0016588051,0.00001221649,0.00044874373,0.00005141654,0.0001088806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013817636,0.00007426605,0.00014812803,0.00025265059,0.00086189236,0.00012272176,0.00011618164,0.00018000344,0.0000021387343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002894371,0.00038265754,0.06290592,0.012966518,0.0006431374,0.000011318675,0.07273722,0.0003062669,0.0015444747,0.14701499,0.6834708,0.017727299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019102669,0.000030272107,0.008042181,0.0010058047,0.000041228242,0.000001553351,0.0020569856,0.000023362094,0.00022167497,0.00022274589,0.9880057,0.00015748537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7147298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9363724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4407409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051312736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004303782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508643074","doi":"","title":"Contradictions and Challenges in Canadian Family Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Family law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.047264677936559044,"score_gpt":0.29283451972028046,"score_spread":0.24556984178372143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508643074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29176167,0.019517293,0.0000017816653,0.01786856,0.00047494512,0.00040738113,0.00001790224,0.00010541186,0.66984504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936381,0.0036614481,0.00013431019,0.0016351962,0.00030679183,0.000016586575,0.0000018856638,0.000008723067,0.000596954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998534,0.00009937777,0.00018916419,0.0002459991,0.00023712574,0.00069432525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901986,0.00016277788,0.000035631456,0.00010602523,0.000067135064,0.0006085754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091374305,0.00012173866,0.00018216601,0.000044620047,0.0011503713,0.00008948188,0.0001487788,0.00014802194,0.000057971894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015494654,0.000113882226,0.000039377206,0.00016185574,0.000551536,0.00028422172,0.000025709864,0.00023337016,0.00007728041],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005129098,0.000020883705,0.008707224,0.000008443494,0.000021816702,0.000027226211,0.009356071,0.000001430205,0.00004873683,0.97858137,0.00053497916,0.0026867008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026617467,0.000015933425,0.13487008,0.000021152202,0.0000074734166,6.709164e-7,0.015094499,0.0000016646393,0.0000117803065,0.0014332853,0.8481172,0.00016009095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9594747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97714806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050542096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010347729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8847842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508932541","doi":"10.21991/c96q2t","title":"BEYOND ANDREWS: SUBSTANTIVE EQUALITY AND POSITIVE OBLIGATIONS AFTER ELDRIDGE AND VRIEND","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Disadvantaged; Disadvantage; Duty; Law; Political science; High Court; Section (typography); Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.03609435680499443,"score_gpt":0.2900341658805447,"score_spread":0.25393980907555025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508932541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6271491,0.0066512846,0.015572994,0.012144995,0.0018422301,0.002179117,0.0020796855,0.0003894736,0.33199114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99669415,0.00043248694,0.001440209,0.00078496,0.00011619919,0.00010827862,0.00005299368,0.000007036689,0.00036369442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761254,0.00017993983,0.00043954674,0.0005745681,0.0004697801,0.0007236488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856436,0.00025063276,0.00016520481,0.00016093679,0.00049023563,0.00036864934],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048823107,0.00032110116,0.0003508791,0.000119027354,0.003649558,0.00015174938,0.00017048915,0.00023702683,0.00024707182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000516413,0.00029241428,0.000117562275,0.00033671787,0.017412549,0.0012581289,0.00022779402,0.00026940956,0.00005515503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007337377,0.00007134641,0.0806732,0.000008935357,0.00010338849,0.000016901951,0.008118012,0.0000010541448,0.00003888364,0.9098132,0.0004667162,0.0006149713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049271034,0.00030270664,0.48458895,0.00053356535,0.0005877404,0.00024837424,0.12640236,0.00010204903,0.0010369672,0.26678813,0.11164817,0.00283389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024102547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004457089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6430251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024762168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051461597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510059581","doi":"","title":"What's so special about marriage? The impact of Wilkinson v Kitzinger","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CentAUR (University of Reading)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Meaning (existential); Lesbian; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.025400520026517937,"score_gpt":0.27223277826268927,"score_spread":0.24683225823617133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510059581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9799211,0.00025223257,0.000012769661,0.0012862022,0.000464028,0.000210832,0.000009866742,0.000027927203,0.017815048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99238414,0.002623715,0.00012865338,0.000018186654,0.00044058822,1.2315269e-7,0.0000034301866,0.000005286519,0.0043958793],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989184,0.00013459066,0.000105213374,0.00016822557,0.00037748835,0.00029605805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992759,0.000118980155,0.00020247762,0.00014392972,0.00015897371,0.00009970122],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025503492,0.00011185244,0.00025361145,0.00004361942,0.0016386709,0.000037224643,0.0004152633,0.00009303855,0.0008126505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000086754226,0.000089095316,0.0002855003,0.00028129533,0.0016601452,0.00069106347,0.00012153847,0.00013059405,0.000038165515],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019665773,0.00024816065,0.1025281,0.00003264642,0.00048469234,0.0000499919,0.7760784,0.000036737463,0.0011836502,0.007066075,0.09564986,0.016445022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081513537,0.00010480684,0.6349011,0.00010721004,0.000080507205,0.0000028786044,0.24371372,0.00002002799,0.00015608688,0.000280738,0.11953368,0.00028411736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03526844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030800507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.532373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033848564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001184672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510850940","doi":"","title":"Discrimination and Dignity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Legislature; Element (criminal law); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.020657563930472498,"score_gpt":0.3029320942038183,"score_spread":0.28227453027334576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510850940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9494222,0.0052249003,0.0008536388,0.0046244515,0.00025778046,0.00015694396,5.941156e-7,0.000039727405,0.039419796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888142,0.007577065,0.000067226494,0.000041996198,0.00014187442,0.0000024747947,2.9013322e-7,0.0000042834918,0.003350633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824935,0.00022196297,0.00010150128,0.00009287746,0.00023641557,0.0010978868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997026,0.000052811614,0.000062331674,0.000031483873,0.00007860352,0.00007219351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016642172,0.000067999164,0.00008359447,0.000019996818,0.001276623,0.00008281842,0.00007768169,0.00004518834,0.000029069099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054150587,0.000051963307,0.000038345337,0.00009321555,0.00015535847,0.00025507362,0.000011347841,0.000574433,0.000010392873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032569844,0.000020777326,0.008291186,0.0000015557215,0.000035999426,5.6773604e-7,0.008726373,5.3047364e-7,0.000050162133,0.96852285,0.00008480933,0.014261926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006168079,0.00013167255,0.022545766,0.000014051207,0.000057889854,0.000046537818,0.15716907,0.0000032298249,0.00006273104,0.7457,0.07336442,0.00028781474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081562146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011642945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22282284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007883171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044507484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9818881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1511491272","doi":"10.18061/dsq.v32i1.3032","title":"Equality &amp; Disability – A Charter Analysis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disability Studies Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Flourishing; Norm (philosophy); Situated; Sociology; Race (biology); Institution; Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Gender studies; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.1009499404288589,"score_gpt":0.40938839830346946,"score_spread":0.30843845787461055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1511491272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9814701,0.0021989448,0.000084334264,0.010851222,0.0010082973,0.00077189715,0.00007723444,0.0003274518,0.003210509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739337,0.000092788156,0.00030380624,0.00022550105,0.0011450315,0.00022954201,0.000032565673,0.000013897515,0.0005634717],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99464154,0.0015725874,0.0007785056,0.0007053622,0.0009781144,0.0013239159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693644,0.0012270769,0.0002207416,0.0008292912,0.0003469238,0.00043955148],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003814649,0.0004149543,0.0010217188,0.000028894969,0.0020472973,0.00011273574,0.0004305763,0.00017823852,0.00062574766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014256649,0.00032338238,0.00079187774,0.0012010712,0.0053366325,0.00082716363,0.00012478195,0.00028033595,0.00054108887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020647592,0.000663117,0.724934,0.00005150633,0.0015938091,1.1023914e-7,0.2639082,7.0382924e-7,0.000006087457,0.0028832047,0.0010143032,0.004924309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022489272,0.000060280116,0.75031435,0.000007525772,0.00084968517,9.113768e-8,0.17659737,0.0000025412858,0.0000025987829,0.0010527688,0.07040803,0.00047987327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014137001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07211217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08731084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015120722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002567889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513173581","doi":"10.21991/c9dm31","title":"Insite: Site and Sight","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Jurisdiction; Sight; Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.027761494307644824,"score_gpt":0.29261908705758033,"score_spread":0.2648575927499355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513173581","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28171247,0.021411093,0.01871192,0.049563903,0.008443302,0.0023591097,0.00048997346,0.0011061914,0.61620206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954056,0.00040281747,0.0011683791,0.0012007897,0.0005934498,0.00006657717,0.00004995437,0.000007717945,0.0011047141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973239,0.00017566778,0.00038561545,0.00036574874,0.0006142715,0.0011348241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985304,0.00031932347,0.00013886484,0.00017789574,0.00029231398,0.0005412254],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066358707,0.00030164726,0.00032088577,0.00011523984,0.005506269,0.00015180213,0.00020712138,0.00024467954,0.00038515692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010434219,0.0002683029,0.00014977808,0.00036543887,0.010782416,0.0016630978,0.00023170968,0.00033097074,0.00053887797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014385564,0.00007091799,0.14961177,0.000008758948,0.00005295873,0.000003978166,0.0020140188,0.000013601846,0.00015828507,0.84228337,0.0049315295,0.00083642645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007763642,0.00002082185,0.013368473,0.000065998734,0.000067913425,0.000055276247,0.011281334,0.000030246498,0.00011144641,0.0036423,0.97003305,0.0005468039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010391965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009368649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9651015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039607924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000485828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516154490","doi":"10.21991/c9jw99","title":"Reference re Supreme Court Act, ss 5 and 6 — Expanding the Constitution of Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Remand (court procedure); Majority opinion; Economic Justice; Certiorari; Court of equity; Precedent; Concurring opinion","score_opus":0.0322041707836593,"score_gpt":0.2834642513646748,"score_spread":0.2512600805810155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516154490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10799533,0.003028192,0.020242402,0.08674172,0.0070927194,0.0024798159,0.000615598,0.00036479265,0.77143943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99781245,0.00020380995,0.00032675458,0.00076783664,0.00018320399,0.000054622207,0.000036257854,0.000005021664,0.00061004155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970338,0.00024783338,0.0005709598,0.00044018458,0.0009099318,0.0007972992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782175,0.00074229675,0.0003066295,0.0002762478,0.0005869298,0.00026613974],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097635295,0.00030344693,0.0004107427,0.000071030125,0.0052807764,0.00011220135,0.00043341797,0.00019138,0.00016012117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022158397,0.00022821732,0.00010529892,0.0003280251,0.014858304,0.0005698425,0.00021092477,0.0003377541,0.000013647395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002748342,0.000025236188,0.022257699,0.000020302265,0.00006483485,0.000003002715,0.00056492566,0.00020225611,0.0001754827,0.96533704,0.010838007,0.0004837158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001310332,0.000054444994,0.0065343827,0.00029706585,0.00011568971,0.000050204562,0.025495503,0.00031761537,0.0005412377,0.011950293,0.95265365,0.00067956443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16080156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4617076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9533868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059320807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003322865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99601424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516890318","doi":"10.7202/1018395ar","title":"Hugo Cyr, Canadian Federalism and Treaty Powers: Organic Constitutionalism at Work, New York, PIE Peter Lang, 2009","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Constitutionalism; Treaty; Work (physics); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.035875792759122845,"score_gpt":0.26131932136063124,"score_spread":0.2254435286015084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516890318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11745017,0.0027463275,0.0000032635835,0.03613472,0.0011212578,0.00045559858,0.000068920635,0.0000847942,0.841935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97434914,0.00027650144,0.00038617925,0.0018732696,0.00065294036,0.000005586549,0.0000056316685,0.000013148533,0.0224376],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983647,0.00014107791,0.00024077839,0.00021382405,0.00040072197,0.00063893833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985555,0.00008455066,0.000111799985,0.00008687129,0.00017741432,0.000983871],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025557753,0.00019138916,0.00023008647,0.000051206793,0.0067879446,0.00039441505,0.00020351457,0.00015500514,0.0050505865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012692643,0.00014602269,0.00009744692,0.00016901696,0.0005250721,0.00036621833,0.00005739184,0.00029911872,0.00058767636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027460797,0.00006310298,0.021970749,0.000010035898,0.0004113374,0.00020441334,0.014154007,0.0000074868913,0.00017742236,0.25966787,0.6976434,0.005662724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045385837,0.000018989731,0.009680217,0.000035399375,0.000030409712,0.00007077282,0.0014375496,6.2183886e-7,0.000014744797,0.0005952548,0.9874295,0.00023265762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72094977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9244452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85689896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096554466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008692509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518059740","doi":"","title":"Equality as a Comparative Concept: Mirror, Mirror, on the Wall, What's the Fairest of Them All?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Inequality; Social equality; Political science; Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07385561267386537,"score_gpt":0.3527944241166467,"score_spread":0.2789388114427813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518059740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8982506,0.0040675155,0.00001761519,0.07905801,0.00026271242,0.00054455805,0.0000037045904,0.000037019916,0.017758299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99305266,0.0025590411,0.000016262611,0.0007496314,0.00011393593,0.00001911652,0.0000019376944,0.00000991882,0.0034775145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956139,0.0011527365,0.00040801117,0.00020663429,0.0009100034,0.0017087272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981851,0.0008641564,0.00043560207,0.00019322331,0.00025599822,0.00006590383],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032751174,0.00021627042,0.00031648017,0.000017351414,0.0019585367,0.0002698671,0.0008255217,0.000100472855,0.0001803262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019376117,0.00010303064,0.00025691837,0.00025131606,0.0011462624,0.0004333473,0.0000638426,0.0015320777,0.00010267371],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006229228,0.00013112942,0.00093760533,0.0000017923535,0.00026485496,0.0000011146451,0.050340444,0.000003006317,0.00024081768,0.94619554,0.00076676096,0.0010546556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008594141,0.00039536002,0.01552064,0.00007587201,0.00011715523,0.000021437774,0.52051985,0.000016465176,0.0007850345,0.3680073,0.093288325,0.00039315104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06782805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1334025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57818824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001094927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087349437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518067101","doi":"10.7202/043765ar","title":"BJARNE MELKEVIK, Réflexions sur la philosophie du droit, Québec, Les Presses de l’Université Laval, 2000, 214 p., ISBN 2-7637-7735-X.","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.013985871885570583,"score_gpt":0.2334504493331741,"score_spread":0.21946457744760353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518067101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40144005,0.15806766,0.0012233746,0.18173347,0.0014593021,0.0012859236,0.0002703526,0.0006918634,0.25382802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77686626,0.09022251,0.0015675431,0.0017513038,0.0013429911,0.0000704855,0.000031452284,0.00012940819,0.12801805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99507624,0.001221623,0.0005519525,0.0007929263,0.00078814814,0.0015691055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99662393,0.0014474116,0.00037063388,0.00042838222,0.00031828406,0.0008113271],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010687021,0.0006586566,0.00080419343,0.00012292626,0.0030253213,0.0002520787,0.0009045505,0.0010891039,0.0034880193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024102624,0.0007119956,0.0005617199,0.00082303863,0.0036099711,0.00075211533,0.00015421605,0.001262234,0.00030326465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011953055,0.0008440853,0.014849901,0.00039706286,0.0010681098,0.00052344776,0.11055871,0.0006109546,0.0009656422,0.6084401,0.24052809,0.021094328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009832262,0.000107527434,0.004520448,0.00019515077,0.00055218977,0.00006807823,0.012365785,0.00009135905,0.0007372809,0.03055642,0.9488381,0.000984433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30992126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09437228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006764289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001133701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518430871","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2360310","title":"Conceptual Metaphors for an Unfinished Constitution","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03321330002785273,"score_gpt":0.3176548386808913,"score_spread":0.28444153865303856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518430871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9563936,0.003733564,0.005523411,0.008901556,0.0011371872,0.0015024482,0.000007752245,0.0001710561,0.022629416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953457,0.0013248404,0.00035141563,0.0001522025,0.0006678392,0.00005600183,0.000004200606,0.00000752773,0.002090282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711394,0.00021490768,0.00023292768,0.00017543111,0.0003217309,0.0019410495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916553,0.00011461993,0.00014299196,0.00007078303,0.000344396,0.00016164774],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016331155,0.00012794434,0.00019268136,0.00003274563,0.0017916922,0.00016731316,0.0002715022,0.000103669125,0.00016035183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044414334,0.00009852189,0.0001367816,0.00012747794,0.0007135682,0.00076527934,0.000017941094,0.0006511286,0.000070019356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012992885,0.000036444097,0.0006459527,9.4805677e-7,0.00012303687,1.8642059e-7,0.008147628,0.000007600475,0.0003037521,0.98086125,0.0010498341,0.0088104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017961025,0.000847322,0.0016949968,0.000014905851,0.0001443311,0.000026785945,0.3855934,0.0000619842,0.00016513767,0.37813163,0.23095956,0.0005638147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006230109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015397453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6027296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011047111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014238133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519493522","doi":"","title":"Justice Gonthier and Disability Rights: The Case of Nova Scotia (Workers' Compensation Board) v. Martin","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Appeal; Economic Justice; Compensation (psychology); Tribunal; Law; Workers' compensation; Disability studies; Political science; Legislation; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.024397563041967607,"score_gpt":0.3194481662665341,"score_spread":0.2950506032245665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519493522","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98901236,0.0035095208,0.000117796684,0.004727389,0.00041135206,0.00021941133,0.0000017886898,0.00001462105,0.0019857832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99860644,0.00031140025,0.00008058011,0.00004005451,0.00065024616,0.000001703488,5.023774e-7,0.0000052240284,0.00030387501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975692,0.00048633607,0.00026335163,0.00011432691,0.00024954465,0.0013172341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999152,0.00030657242,0.00020300804,0.00010031172,0.00013184277,0.00010628734],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037518882,0.00011422212,0.00017035966,0.000012457295,0.0013766806,0.000055680895,0.00015274866,0.00007743767,0.00008103208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003811748,0.000066727276,0.00008002135,0.00016292054,0.00086270855,0.00037301236,0.000047912203,0.00084520073,0.000013955002],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012531027,0.00029677042,0.3989371,0.00004037537,0.0004347164,0.00000803731,0.074792095,0.000014549732,0.00010230714,0.509475,0.0012345434,0.014539192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018576696,0.0003111775,0.2640967,0.00009016294,0.0012387147,0.0009743253,0.6106238,0.00009365016,0.00012403549,0.09845072,0.021345366,0.0007937318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04574431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23142305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53583163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083870714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001891337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521054892","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1177","title":"Resiling from Reconciling?: Musing on R. v. Kapp","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Charter; Disadvantaged; Context (archaeology); Political science; Section (typography); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; History","score_opus":0.07631733068617569,"score_gpt":0.3569624379205901,"score_spread":0.28064510723441444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521054892","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08537492,0.44252637,0.000049911498,0.116566025,0.0017415247,0.0028404745,0.000040920997,0.0007898672,0.35006997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7854342,0.17906633,0.0023056353,0.029327093,0.0019352887,0.000035177865,0.00002932743,0.000031094427,0.0018358522],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977993,0.0003461421,0.00040760884,0.00039738356,0.0006007471,0.00044883715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989646,0.00025975678,0.00014908514,0.00028122088,0.00019171472,0.00015358809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010361435,0.00021022167,0.0005011277,0.000012992045,0.0010777772,0.00009230385,0.00034068638,0.00010645206,0.00045361213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008985978,0.00016856441,0.00020434354,0.00022939508,0.00020083095,0.00023570012,0.00003670233,0.00025963262,0.0004443879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009242151,0.00050078356,0.00119324,0.0015275236,0.00038813386,0.00011449127,0.044237304,0.00005060671,0.0024476212,0.36262485,0.16730867,0.41951436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013434401,0.000035960355,0.0004707428,0.0036935476,0.00007175812,2.774362e-7,0.00041707407,0.0000046086025,0.000085354826,0.0018501343,0.99297243,0.0002637432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006474237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037842023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8256638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033123855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006915515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97871524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523660458","doi":"","title":"An Institutional Suicide Machine: Discrimination Against Federally Sentenced Aboriginal Women in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Criminology; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.022348626949717277,"score_gpt":0.2638741762029914,"score_spread":0.24152554925327413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523660458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85083497,0.0000019900256,0.0000376063,0.000613273,0.00017749787,0.000356681,0.000033885757,0.000072811454,0.14787127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787178,0.020663943,0.00022018673,0.00018867721,0.00008745029,0.0000057991047,0.00003875695,0.000007802131,0.00006955286],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803215,0.00026363265,0.00016517664,0.00034635264,0.00056779623,0.0006248758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934685,0.0000624724,0.00009401563,0.00012284968,0.00018081757,0.0001930121],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020885613,0.0001863925,0.00022089273,0.001006993,0.0015188536,0.000044894623,0.0003924643,0.00007318333,0.000031419786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009691496,0.00018597668,0.00004989596,0.0032325438,0.0003133744,0.0009567988,0.000053174594,0.00022453447,0.000005128226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040407034,0.0006713895,0.51825327,0.000066640394,0.00016510967,0.002621157,0.43932402,0.0013294995,0.00007129142,0.014227807,0.00033341235,0.022532312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009829443,0.000047211033,0.09009523,0.00003079341,0.000011742584,0.0000036125884,0.038784154,0.00038454524,0.00002558661,0.0000013086237,0.86924803,0.00038481757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9987519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86891466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076992936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005124356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524847764","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1057","title":"Enforcing a Parent/Child Relationship at All Cost?: Supervised Access Orders in the Canadian Courts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Attorney-General's Department, Australian Government; Griffith University; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Focus (optics); Key (lock); Component (thermodynamics); Focus group; Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Computer security","score_opus":0.16740974870066885,"score_gpt":0.34736195174549017,"score_spread":0.17995220304482132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524847764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09435884,0.0003198866,0.000008778699,0.015093266,0.0004262129,0.0005248705,0.0000074837794,0.000029883986,0.8892308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99744445,0.00013512386,0.0001537824,0.0017966941,0.00021832278,0.000026498054,0.0000056674335,0.0000125235865,0.00020696603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975798,0.0005374302,0.00033230803,0.00018472385,0.00061203697,0.00075369945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893063,0.00022295304,0.00015374896,0.00014264486,0.00015657097,0.00039347803],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016530553,0.00016525945,0.00018501387,0.00006707222,0.0056573404,0.00047038466,0.00080743164,0.00014540157,0.0006653942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039476927,0.0001144605,0.000110914916,0.00022464186,0.00034180278,0.0006873602,0.00007287694,0.0006661774,0.00005720132],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031878244,0.000063441665,0.3305754,0.000008220283,0.0000786068,0.00013130107,0.21299355,0.0000836808,0.0000018833347,0.4512975,0.0041572363,0.000577307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020172065,0.00007578794,0.69045484,0.00021138851,0.00014713581,0.00012731236,0.0623733,0.000105582614,0.0000232324,0.041904863,0.20165226,0.00090711983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9721904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99929255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9030856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011751921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020073856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526634404","doi":"","title":"The Difference of Queer","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Queer; Institution; Legislation; Sociology; Politics; Gender studies; Human sexuality; Democracy; Mainstream; Law; Sexual orientation; Political science","score_opus":0.031103220381397068,"score_gpt":0.29578999709182574,"score_spread":0.2646867767104287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526634404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9439282,0.003940554,7.872149e-7,0.0153511455,0.00039453176,0.00026281137,0.000014180549,0.00003668493,0.036071103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853022,0.0013848164,0.000044256998,0.00047974172,0.00026488968,0.00007205397,2.3082633e-7,0.0000053744516,0.012446408],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870443,0.00009438208,0.00017295666,0.00013984193,0.00026144736,0.0006269424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989762,0.00034196483,0.00006753903,0.00012327163,0.00024984576,0.00024119327],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039425507,0.00010989238,0.00020346268,0.00003238422,0.0022120553,0.00003949866,0.00028475703,0.00004360533,0.000061148094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091447117,0.0000687453,0.000048191796,0.00020992722,0.0011741366,0.000073010124,0.000051575105,0.00009323802,0.00004606933],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011002565,0.000022270144,0.021019781,0.000029794108,0.0006318808,0.000005661222,0.79846305,0.000010655316,0.00006327129,0.13887864,0.01135588,0.029508099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013454817,0.000025734078,0.018597355,0.000019653085,0.000013918662,1.5227529e-7,0.49002996,0.0000020415625,0.00003900057,0.0028503959,0.48809946,0.00018777796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029834015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7275232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6976892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012128783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022244435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527705800","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511635489.019","title":"Induction of labour","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Hospital Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Business; Mathematics","score_opus":0.037538364851698966,"score_gpt":0.24583091454762693,"score_spread":0.20829254969592798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527705800","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001080112,0.00018258671,0.00000705713,0.00014620916,0.00024760747,0.00033669602,0.00010303686,0.00010006061,0.99779665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008536195,0.00053790194,0.00006969303,0.00003122161,0.0002765615,2.2659776e-7,0.000008315138,0.000012361278,0.9905275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886316,0.00006668511,0.00015320008,0.00027867086,0.00040529645,0.00023296975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904114,0.000048836424,0.00027780133,0.00018562248,0.0003321719,0.00011440009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014096033,0.0002094023,0.00034947292,0.00007492305,0.0005181593,0.00002288181,0.00035767374,0.00041083727,0.000015064778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000347892,0.0002282076,0.0001901987,0.00001186672,0.0006262297,0.000109144305,0.00013230958,0.00031127638,0.000010203124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002172793,0.000006703251,0.0000026191724,0.000030061676,0.00008428987,0.000019505225,0.0012959888,5.844994e-7,0.00003317138,0.9814444,0.012123932,0.004936975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002027953,0.000028278437,0.00020101832,0.00008065362,0.00009149777,4.94102e-7,0.00081922463,3.510322e-7,0.00009969092,0.00003388714,0.9982017,0.00024036434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057399236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009666132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9860778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003916649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009966511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93060356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529214970","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664313.003.0002","title":"Dignity, Equality, and Comparison","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Plaintiff; Comparability; Interpretation (philosophy); Law and economics; Redress; Political science; Prima facie; Law; Relevance (law); Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06854093191385721,"score_gpt":0.30053529679993846,"score_spread":0.23199436488608124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529214970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27261096,0.000035979076,0.000052705233,0.00054899504,0.00006859322,0.00030592724,0.0000046809887,0.000103206854,0.72626895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8962626,0.000105347535,0.0002719073,0.00005341109,0.00005441544,0.0000014620956,0.0000012750851,0.0000038664098,0.103245735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990826,0.00017899471,0.000082255385,0.00017112268,0.00022171467,0.0002632806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994922,0.000104972605,0.000061306295,0.00008874922,0.000105288585,0.00014747886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001384386,0.00009327958,0.00015532364,0.000019739018,0.0010084084,0.00011417987,0.00022423777,0.00008411139,0.000039216655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038573668,0.00008917081,0.000042563282,0.000021892167,0.0004986108,0.00024605973,0.00031314295,0.000114346505,0.0000027532883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002512303,0.00007468325,0.030915534,0.000044060194,0.00012261583,0.0000059766594,0.071336664,0.0000031305913,0.0001562756,0.86251616,0.011192377,0.023607407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023842139,0.000015932925,0.012331671,0.0000080875625,0.000021811215,1.236526e-7,0.013875245,0.00003023094,0.000052149397,0.00022722901,0.9730579,0.00014120071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030606365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020314748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96186554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010048935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017572007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9758489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529947265","doi":"","title":"Le contrat de mariage en droit québécois : un destin marqué du sceau du paradoxe","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.004486056585086852,"score_gpt":0.1682365149952254,"score_spread":0.16375045841013855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529947265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80231875,0.038680416,0.0005908999,0.026493246,0.0016109822,0.0006008114,0.000074758645,0.00024926136,0.12938087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94656026,0.0017164384,0.0012466423,0.00034059185,0.0012394976,0.000027003212,0.0000284503,0.000026971347,0.048814125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639094,0.0006698741,0.00047424083,0.0006544545,0.0008157858,0.0009947353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812263,0.0005004224,0.0003402219,0.000269547,0.00030828008,0.00045886735],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006145763,0.0004677795,0.00050766545,0.00009170289,0.015914908,0.00014743253,0.00061811315,0.00049918325,0.00013249852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024996905,0.00053941575,0.00041541416,0.00051903503,0.0019089318,0.0007637504,0.0003312746,0.0004479212,0.00015302765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030441207,0.0007107856,0.14108025,0.00007488467,0.00048263252,0.004599255,0.08023671,0.0021575682,0.0027477588,0.7513029,0.010456198,0.005846675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002378632,0.00010972796,0.30705035,0.0001547139,0.0004976118,0.0007195986,0.06420385,0.0013009013,0.0012441089,0.004535214,0.61677104,0.0010342693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8946228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3907633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74676764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012486513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025835088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530058139","doi":"","title":"The Embarrassing Preamble? Understanding the 'Supremacy of God' and the Charter","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Charter; Preamble; Dignity; Fundamental rights; Original meaning; Bill of rights; Human rights; Originalism; Constitution; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03997345199637234,"score_gpt":0.2994070011599536,"score_spread":0.2594335491635813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530058139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2383676,0.0032343399,0.0010708983,0.19558065,0.00045375247,0.0012381332,0.0000026630307,0.000099704994,0.55995226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945011,0.00019904684,0.0000331249,0.00012487597,0.00018450558,0.000011863656,1.6959696e-7,0.0000037465916,0.0049415734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989299,0.00025921638,0.00016560995,0.00010186911,0.00030872095,0.00023468846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986326,0.0010993823,0.0000883715,0.00011110472,0.00004797369,0.000020568159],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010980095,0.000077822595,0.00011142171,0.000005495689,0.0036442436,0.00022493121,0.00022047761,0.000033586075,0.00004321272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017415709,0.000025984315,0.0000625374,0.00012053459,0.002130301,0.000118918826,0.00007374534,0.000092803864,0.000003409344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020958254,0.000010750965,0.005267131,0.000005643722,0.00005277367,2.027537e-7,0.063758165,0.0000063765697,0.0001507995,0.92350024,0.006074503,0.0011524756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019002242,0.000029952907,0.076242164,0.00006512242,0.0001443308,0.0000019344386,0.6783817,0.0006214969,0.0003526126,0.13923617,0.1026594,0.00036490895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012816047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014333825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.784264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094393785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020370071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533620438","doi":"","title":"Circumscribed Spheres of Belonging and Action: Framing Indigenous Self-Determination in Terms of 'Non-Domination'","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Constitutionalism; Democracy; Framing (construction); Politics; State (computer science); Sociology; Political science; Colonialism; Indigenous rights; Law and economics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.018301824979090563,"score_gpt":0.29195696539954374,"score_spread":0.2736551404204532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533620438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99642134,0.000641489,0.0005685036,0.00007219719,0.00009522967,0.00017427544,5.199485e-7,0.000012159218,0.002014265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99703133,0.0023354858,0.00043904915,0.0000041459552,0.00008035358,0.0000043633263,3.7011642e-7,0.0000065151507,0.00009838211],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847364,0.00012147726,0.00029781583,0.00010960546,0.0002736623,0.0007238052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994263,0.000069113295,0.00031178648,0.000046566398,0.00010825508,0.000037982514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011291676,0.00008742197,0.00019002825,0.0000961159,0.00036306313,0.000017778406,0.00014160886,0.000083009174,0.000024399169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013645677,0.00007778051,0.00004999859,0.00021851086,0.00013794831,0.00037978086,0.000025074858,0.0004610249,7.326728e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056846806,0.00024185759,0.3797809,0.000080745805,0.00019897081,0.000005403598,0.40452135,0.0000066646026,0.0047639734,0.019498749,0.0000038998132,0.19084066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017843755,0.00051407015,0.60490566,0.00020582562,0.000113984344,0.000054492826,0.30353823,0.00018974452,0.005666837,0.08244155,0.00015486946,0.0004303767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00437029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024054542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22512475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007369602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033181292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533865971","doi":"","title":"Feminist Activism in the Supreme Court: Legal Mobilization and the Women's Legal Education and Action Fund (review)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Supreme court; Humanities; Ethnology; Law; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.032429925361732975,"score_gpt":0.29347486159463915,"score_spread":0.26104493623290614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533865971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5384244,0.0002451661,0.000019165487,0.02142126,0.0002027538,0.0020727643,0.00000709429,0.000078950165,0.43752846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7720529,0.22699437,0.000036875714,0.00055905385,0.00015053977,0.000019770072,0.0000034170228,0.000005058404,0.00017805664],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985211,0.0005787272,0.0001247873,0.00024108155,0.0002768698,0.00025745362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999391,0.00024059862,0.00011367595,0.00012515624,0.000082770115,0.000046771205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007547684,0.00013867056,0.00017704601,0.00051258696,0.000937845,0.00013404276,0.00022111177,0.00007244482,0.000017778319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017815255,0.00009237351,0.000041818283,0.0020090318,0.0004996416,0.0007352581,0.00007903641,0.00021176781,0.000003600592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003991641,0.0007386405,0.0035506033,0.00034124902,0.00014512046,0.000012620906,0.6425483,0.00001491452,0.0000149458165,0.103346646,0.0037720897,0.24511567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056673004,0.000025652369,0.0016059822,0.000056214543,0.000046017416,0.000003692749,0.06724622,0.000038431626,0.000004595906,0.0000024919157,0.93028605,0.00011789488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09457497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09600628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92651397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051100005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027220388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92048925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535711523","doi":"10.3917/nqf.282.0024","title":"Liberté contractuelle et relations conjugales : font-elles bon ménage ?","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Nouvelles Questions Féministes","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023965851056064295,"score_gpt":0.31531899912207595,"score_spread":0.29135314806601165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535711523","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08889929,0.06916248,0.0006044717,0.46070075,0.0032640598,0.0016485313,0.00035253607,0.00079501065,0.37457284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8148973,0.008218293,0.0047661746,0.001678549,0.0007328704,0.00006117402,0.00006533939,0.00003799465,0.16954228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99565095,0.0009497612,0.0008972588,0.00074516056,0.0007221741,0.0010346851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636924,0.0018455535,0.00044323108,0.00043583944,0.00047086942,0.00043529077],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083276763,0.0006224158,0.00070766936,0.00012478961,0.0031298297,0.0003855001,0.00053801725,0.0006220505,0.0012316596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014207866,0.00059635635,0.00042627877,0.0007625293,0.0019483587,0.00090131257,0.00012001395,0.0007362881,0.0013818633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027527525,0.0007339744,0.001479714,0.000031991483,0.00014282462,0.000027410813,0.03692945,0.00012476416,0.00017042202,0.9091204,0.03373027,0.017481247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008088531,0.0004045814,0.03059579,0.00056233327,0.00034615054,0.000015106394,0.027322147,0.00036783694,0.00011543195,0.01768953,0.9207974,0.0009748182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038349123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044592726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89143085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049425004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040104392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537485993","doi":"10.21153/dlr2006vol11no1art230","title":"The Stolen Generations - Canada and Australia: the Legacy of Assimilation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Law; Project commissioning; Duty of care; Liability; Jurisprudence; Damages; Publishing; Political science; Government (linguistics); Duty; Fiduciary; Tort; Sociology","score_opus":0.04886536736657516,"score_gpt":0.33575195807044494,"score_spread":0.2868865907038698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537485993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50477594,0.19215909,0.00004514605,0.24982716,0.0012002898,0.004123176,0.000074063435,0.000082956605,0.04771219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950148,0.0038272543,0.000056688208,0.00046745868,0.00014418885,0.000030159963,0.0000038587973,0.000002430898,0.00045319757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913776,0.00020671006,0.00019505444,0.00007774983,0.00025303863,0.00012968176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946886,0.00020213262,0.00011212908,0.00009680231,0.000098886834,0.000021173326],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004504583,0.000059659866,0.00012051744,0.0000016859589,0.0013486609,0.00006252361,0.00012665402,0.000021203803,0.000029857323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012280607,0.00002887265,0.000034050547,0.00011245683,0.00032881545,0.000103292135,0.000022806475,0.00006080752,0.0000019847155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.044378e-7,0.000003935689,0.0009368378,0.00005519522,0.0000128797365,3.2710915e-7,0.0001216808,0.000006890709,0.0000066166085,0.9628363,0.034904335,0.0011146581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002459989,0.0000021199824,0.019069733,0.00008930292,0.000035196892,2.6528133e-7,0.000054967313,0.0000025907716,0.000009163427,0.00021751238,0.98045075,0.000043814725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9762426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99214065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9626188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000080612896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007350522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537810167","doi":"","title":"The myth and the meaning of science as a vocation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Theology","score_opus":0.016788846927294772,"score_gpt":0.2630401191761365,"score_spread":0.24625127224884175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537810167","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88124186,0.0005231766,0.000053952044,0.060267493,0.000090578964,0.00031442157,0.0000016152819,0.000022250062,0.05748467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624324,0.000434629,0.00079239206,0.00008466666,0.00005315168,2.493676e-7,1.3977248e-7,0.0000012902401,0.0023902212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991943,0.00009704572,0.00006704553,0.0001097694,0.00038993979,0.00014186416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992066,0.00032950233,0.00012892607,0.00008947387,0.0002031174,0.000042371023],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001020338,0.000043251483,0.000097149685,0.00002516955,0.0029040878,0.000028706476,0.00038801954,0.000029772407,0.00001775663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003741818,0.000028783334,0.00004083054,0.00036766918,0.005747262,0.00029817165,0.00015307392,0.0000655653,0.000007587375],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099154124,0.000035549307,0.0016330011,0.0000103006,0.000046415553,6.348961e-7,0.41394946,0.000044171516,0.0007270269,0.51970017,0.0010252482,0.06272887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017854054,0.00007184548,0.0680661,0.000053510517,0.00008545146,0.0000010781422,0.6978264,0.0013894421,0.0003115001,0.0067447713,0.2234628,0.0002016813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008856005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074323975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5129554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008418827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011415122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537841610","doi":"","title":"Sexual Assault in Canada: Law, Legal Practice and Women's Activism ed. by Elizabeth Sheehy (review)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Criminology; Political science; Law; Sociology; Sexual violence; Medicine; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.01926015339986512,"score_gpt":0.28107275979151164,"score_spread":0.2618126063916465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537841610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8536834,0.05417492,0.000007135223,0.049178902,0.0012121529,0.0006351237,0.00022387072,0.000016873993,0.040867604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660943,0.010968195,0.00019429029,0.021237534,0.0003399924,0.000018207405,0.000008320194,0.00002948321,0.0011096705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971462,0.00042840614,0.00055743,0.0003254104,0.00039143194,0.0011511454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953379,0.0004471219,0.00042528645,0.0001381027,0.0007054024,0.0029462078],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003063664,0.00028001613,0.0007199554,0.000029032584,0.0008319824,0.00015909644,0.0003258211,0.00022530103,0.00004667442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012226736,0.00028244907,0.00010542986,0.00023803471,0.00077653606,0.0010127688,0.00003896914,0.00092011044,9.954122e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034539262,0.000060514703,0.0017095356,0.0004655446,0.0006907689,0.0008265823,0.3412677,0.000023200842,0.000032093434,0.23078755,0.41766778,0.0064341826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006994425,0.000094377414,0.00037790881,0.00019671951,0.00007417384,0.00008598319,0.22299966,0.000010064874,0.0000016452112,0.00040152922,0.77471155,0.0003469157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3570438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00915478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008081006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540370978","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139021555","title":"The Cambridge Introduction to the Eighteenth-Century Novel","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Solitude; Cosmopolitanism; Identity (music); History; Variety (cybernetics); Independence (probability theory); Secrecy; Literature; History of literature; Period (music); Aesthetics; Art; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02527524517670609,"score_gpt":0.23770837941237524,"score_spread":0.21243313423566915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1540370978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013014971,0.0020277705,0.0000888366,0.0054430813,0.0035362837,0.0015811422,0.00020986775,0.00018850976,0.98679435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008234606,0.002400382,0.000038747905,0.00019745716,0.007746437,0.000009835503,0.000039184153,0.000035345656,0.98870915],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971005,0.00033741223,0.00024703136,0.0005678525,0.0008801549,0.00086704723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979123,0.0003572663,0.00030496484,0.0006778229,0.00041573515,0.00033193917],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007934215,0.0004229974,0.00037683133,0.000061300336,0.0052628433,0.00025071084,0.001503585,0.00037902387,0.000004935448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015933577,0.00028399916,0.00031078063,0.000063213774,0.0012186501,0.0002027547,0.000821927,0.00077254325,0.000119326156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003259056,0.000011965159,0.000002443775,0.0000112397065,0.00012688097,0.000003079149,0.0014793951,0.0000012834982,0.000010489883,0.40837133,0.58859193,0.0013573729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022200203,0.000018768074,0.00019529743,0.00003366333,0.00024877384,0.0000018794677,0.0028291189,0.0000021000226,0.000019800447,4.434139e-7,0.99603236,0.00039580083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004502936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003244079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40837088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018503139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000315129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541632163","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1244","title":"Reflecting Culture: Polygamy and the Charter","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Charter; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Fundamental rights; Constitutionality; Dignity; Human rights; Multiculturalism","score_opus":0.07417976940743624,"score_gpt":0.3801526344062625,"score_spread":0.30597286499882625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541632163","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018879925,0.7590954,0.0000067008464,0.055614244,0.0005622576,0.0012426245,0.0000032022958,0.00011499041,0.18147263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77099365,0.21392013,0.00024249317,0.0102063995,0.0012085258,0.00010771327,0.0000025421268,0.000013901504,0.0033046473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983875,0.00047025073,0.00021835307,0.00014953394,0.0003399094,0.00043444222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993696,0.00015434249,0.0001006731,0.00014678914,0.00010180377,0.00012676533],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019784064,0.00013667029,0.00032277853,0.0000042505358,0.001353946,0.00007105553,0.00019469147,0.00005725274,0.00022486014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046320254,0.00007047623,0.00011840225,0.0001534721,0.00068007066,0.0003348104,0.00008998769,0.00018036293,0.000123973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012091752,0.00004348724,0.0022545583,0.0007810047,0.00014534543,9.702637e-7,0.066360936,2.3773486e-8,0.000057627803,0.8597867,0.05719674,0.013360525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001868066,0.000004948342,0.00037290718,0.00044454387,0.000094859344,0.0000021762944,0.0010910237,3.7101165e-7,0.000007740933,0.00028738278,0.9973841,0.0001231904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026267145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093951786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94018734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006744292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013044704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543323977","doi":"","title":"Is Constitutionalism Bad for Intersectional Feminists","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Constitutionalism; Charter; Sociology; Gender studies; Faith; Political science; Multiculturalism; Jurisprudence; Family law; Law; Democracy; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019816091922466705,"score_gpt":0.3295474116038052,"score_spread":0.3097313196813385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543323977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8448122,0.0018472736,0.0068482016,0.07586345,0.0083499495,0.0009906263,0.00005936997,0.00019362653,0.061035305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899055,0.00055934256,0.00037616474,0.00036654185,0.0019056887,0.000020700278,0.000003199894,0.0000073227393,0.0068555656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780995,0.000049075068,0.00019037092,0.0001605139,0.00035725883,0.0014328625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992849,0.00014700777,0.00011454176,0.000056610024,0.00028765903,0.00010925938],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015677531,0.000109597124,0.00012849152,0.000037066933,0.0019662764,0.00010375411,0.0002475698,0.0001186706,0.00028455612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048034437,0.00009050455,0.00017849354,0.00010229248,0.0005267639,0.00021922606,0.00002535958,0.0013077606,0.000043980323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022075657,0.000029727637,0.0019091559,0.0000015402264,0.000118789925,5.0227607e-7,0.004299493,6.80854e-7,0.00042237047,0.9868258,0.003308949,0.0030608713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007643253,0.00009854037,0.0019799653,0.000010846625,0.00004074876,0.000108415144,0.018047074,0.000012474498,0.00010621681,0.31025153,0.6683266,0.00025322154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082300336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018175984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6765743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008373238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021474597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543630193","doi":"","title":"Reinvigorating Section 27: An Intersectional Approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Charter; Multiculturalism; Political science; Intersectionality; Minority rights; Law; Faith; Sociology; Gender studies; Law and economics; Human rights; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02120108562940158,"score_gpt":0.30130528726469447,"score_spread":0.28010420163529287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543630193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8813797,0.0018723989,0.01583714,0.008061459,0.0018769798,0.00042659775,0.0000013932317,0.00030924787,0.09023507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99288845,0.00076662423,0.0005196806,0.00016148906,0.0028141679,0.000002925808,0.0000034490342,0.000007594739,0.002835596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972728,0.00028990692,0.0002178736,0.00020445115,0.0004536558,0.0015613291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949914,0.00002706781,0.00014639564,0.0000670197,0.00014253725,0.0001178198],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021419825,0.00012635661,0.00013966166,0.00005511325,0.0019021105,0.00017040403,0.00022202531,0.00010805935,0.000036116973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018211592,0.0001056407,0.00010584039,0.00025035688,0.00010761849,0.00071110914,0.000013932079,0.0015371513,0.000013329483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010851862,0.00037811726,0.004010264,0.0000043339846,0.0002457647,0.0000036291692,0.047822926,0.0004750853,0.0018630932,0.859571,0.0013441709,0.0841731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017401252,0.0021503537,0.016097505,0.000046871675,0.000119871394,0.00046465234,0.52142173,0.0009984869,0.00010221706,0.40972212,0.045977186,0.0011588776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012260315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005916117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4735988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00226303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005607625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543705524","doi":"","title":"Les conjoints de fait au Québec : protection juridique ou paternalisme","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Civil code; Injustice; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05639658886128584,"score_gpt":0.26434201969250437,"score_spread":0.20794543083121853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543705524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69008565,0.000044132972,0.00046711278,0.013005876,0.0007966133,0.0012331109,0.000049761435,0.00030169828,0.29401606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90533036,0.08898409,0.00039733204,0.00011672221,0.00066353945,0.00001291994,0.0000051617308,0.00003357802,0.0044562886],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967315,0.00088591484,0.0002864604,0.0006131532,0.0005052796,0.0009777013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987501,0.00011271163,0.00029837136,0.0002393142,0.0003434937,0.0002560288],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035176196,0.00043091935,0.0004457006,0.0017069557,0.0028206005,0.00006465548,0.00054685277,0.0004583965,0.00020640089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023918197,0.00044809107,0.0003352551,0.0046580476,0.0013716193,0.0008966572,0.00026868962,0.00060824,0.00017340493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003372895,0.0009133555,0.03825018,0.00039882257,0.00083341723,0.0014954242,0.8357417,0.00008003195,0.00009007821,0.015445036,0.0017831641,0.104631476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079095725,0.00017013722,0.009595638,0.00013961659,0.00014345658,0.000035321205,0.008934426,0.000064506676,0.00040136388,0.0000024028748,0.97917825,0.0005439298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9959767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93596035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97739506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067523895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003697632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543804789","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Law of Spousal Support","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Family law; Certainty; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Child support; Geography","score_opus":0.012546939929437331,"score_gpt":0.2826351126852343,"score_spread":0.27008817275579694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543804789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5498964,0.007330799,0.0000866414,0.09795581,0.0015438613,0.00063445786,0.000009837996,0.00007786559,0.3424643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945417,0.0025811058,0.000024271965,0.00015659636,0.0003299407,0.0000022914141,4.976435e-7,0.000006467271,0.0023571018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971745,0.00008598159,0.00018703491,0.00008278461,0.00040468958,0.0020650069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994471,0.000049400063,0.00010610996,0.00006959322,0.00016230789,0.0001655065],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020937172,0.00007997156,0.00011182643,0.000020745472,0.0035128728,0.00009013001,0.00035787013,0.00006814247,0.00003393946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015167281,0.00005095485,0.00009558279,0.00013970202,0.00055426755,0.00013929096,0.000017151358,0.0008504541,0.000035088942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004882384,0.000007875859,0.0006077457,5.0149725e-7,0.000059234248,0.0000023181622,0.0045272065,0.000009701221,0.000012758641,0.992676,0.000114697825,0.001977072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000598041,0.00020719273,0.0024990367,0.0000117162235,0.000037253874,0.000049706137,0.04785586,3.904734e-7,0.00008411539,0.5134029,0.43505254,0.00020122966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7955362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99725133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4792731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038809937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075429464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545562636","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1224","title":"To What End the Dialogue?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Mainstream; Restructuring; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Duty; Law; Transparency (behavior); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.10160000435219092,"score_gpt":0.3372321385744745,"score_spread":0.23563213422228357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545562636","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031889332,0.47524384,0.000022738011,0.132129,0.0022544875,0.0037742278,0.000013638169,0.000268064,0.38310507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49383518,0.47041827,0.0005664959,0.0311924,0.00073735905,0.00033388534,0.0000060585553,0.000025898864,0.0028844457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983306,0.00036007373,0.00024315095,0.00022777231,0.00044638288,0.00039200156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917716,0.0001359252,0.00007273896,0.00028154603,0.00017543379,0.00015721045],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012017499,0.00014521022,0.00030064394,0.000006418357,0.0009690728,0.00011116386,0.00056644325,0.000051394924,0.0018085199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041925165,0.000082473416,0.00015589246,0.00024185886,0.00044369622,0.0004397732,0.00014204337,0.0001303555,0.0012401316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009275521,0.00009794671,0.0007107806,0.0005808742,0.0001470291,0.000011695638,0.081290044,1.8060284e-7,0.000027753977,0.71755594,0.12159711,0.077971384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039058865,0.000016202746,0.0009078309,0.0007959748,0.00005899919,4.4010272e-7,0.0016359924,8.085884e-8,0.000017155293,0.00077457353,0.995612,0.0001416827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012652801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017185753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8740149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098601035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003651778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546479244","doi":"","title":"Jürgen Römer: The Toronto Blessing. Åbo Akademi 2002","year":2003,"lang":"sv","type":"article","venue":"Kyrkohistorisk årsskrift","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blessing; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02811942298398611,"score_gpt":0.30039956287016467,"score_spread":0.27228013988617855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546479244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02096934,0.22834949,0.000043519045,0.0101702325,0.018114533,0.0017371969,0.00007826508,0.0004252732,0.72011214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7592096,0.015804954,0.0007269176,0.0011538259,0.0039346283,0.00015758084,0.000007697725,0.0001238376,0.21888097],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925976,0.0016459636,0.0010004184,0.0011236409,0.0017718709,0.0018605391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669456,0.0006538287,0.0006890155,0.00093782495,0.00045152608,0.00057324267],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002290984,0.00085673574,0.00094658206,0.000039174993,0.006103433,0.00038002594,0.0014060687,0.00076424977,0.00818903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015688185,0.00061551377,0.00063994137,0.0006880384,0.0018136862,0.00086374825,0.00022430802,0.0009505775,0.0020617947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004177612,0.00039812794,0.0050151097,0.0000839975,0.00055409304,0.000028961047,0.2005338,0.000024871068,0.0004570655,0.038015775,0.7405542,0.014292204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005430818,0.00006936713,0.0036848418,0.00007224196,0.00033072577,0.0000037931497,0.042105556,0.000017366183,0.00009086256,0.00022580904,0.9519844,0.00087195175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08062543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028228115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73824024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037054715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047106872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547604290","doi":"","title":"Equality Deferred: The Origins of the Newfoundland Human Rights State","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Érudit (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Ideal (ethics); State (computer science); Inequality; Political science; Government (linguistics); International human rights law; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.021829901379813783,"score_gpt":0.24606037821656612,"score_spread":0.22423047683675235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1547604290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.969886,0.002646097,0.000012993527,0.01008655,0.0003231293,0.00027353805,0.00001776728,0.000045262397,0.016708655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839701,0.00021508308,0.000031351407,0.00007334617,0.00017478003,0.000002847852,0.0000016120398,0.000005451572,0.015525423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861795,0.0003384619,0.00012331539,0.00012474459,0.00036557543,0.0004299663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923974,0.00015002927,0.00016590196,0.00023666545,0.00008865348,0.00011899849],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005296402,0.000117264026,0.00015835921,0.000016909504,0.004246493,0.000019047135,0.00047861115,0.0000677462,0.00008595932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003953807,0.00006563734,0.00014596338,0.0002541146,0.0005143419,0.00022330298,0.0002447438,0.00014870326,0.000032709486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003328655,0.000112689835,0.118859194,0.000014237065,0.00021851072,0.0000063732705,0.094799735,0.000029222447,0.0003745226,0.76153064,0.022702489,0.0013191287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002155154,0.000009236878,0.08789719,0.000007657596,0.00004527721,0.0000016946847,0.0039546024,0.0000027783658,0.000051551368,0.0022073844,0.9055034,0.00010372677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48797333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8343799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8828009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060191606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021913624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99779654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550137324","doi":"","title":"Trans-Phobia and the Relational Production of Gender","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings women's law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Social psychology; Psychology; Identity (music); Privilege (computing); Normative; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03466680934819322,"score_gpt":0.2849187069758384,"score_spread":0.25025189762764516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550137324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9584658,0.00035019984,0.00048138332,0.0058179796,0.0005618951,0.00019705309,8.3284635e-7,0.000022933604,0.034101907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977187,0.00008932798,0.0007996463,0.00011714494,0.0006615063,0.0000034543225,2.0679191e-7,0.0000048889992,0.0006051302],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987134,0.00012812804,0.00027616316,0.00010478326,0.00048584267,0.00029172385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991574,0.00025902086,0.000216777,0.00003826696,0.00023220804,0.00009629796],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035718072,0.000076271164,0.00014039705,0.000021099902,0.0021127928,0.000057729696,0.00009219925,0.000050253686,0.0001243666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052637747,0.000046954105,0.00005391881,0.00014798406,0.0011244369,0.0002485338,0.00001792886,0.00025719783,0.000001793978],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038506102,0.00008274287,0.007152567,0.00003169947,0.00019050553,0.0000066837474,0.5634092,0.00007189593,0.0019297474,0.41800237,0.000783188,0.007954324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0058170417,0.00016519344,0.15542635,0.00016203622,0.00016694274,0.0002304308,0.40188584,0.00003709832,0.00056595786,0.060015477,0.37484974,0.00067789067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046674843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005189971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37406656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015133467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029819477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99918634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551668827","doi":"10.21991/c9kd4w","title":"The Notwithstanding Clause, the Charter, and Canada's Patriated Constitution: What I Thought We Were Doing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"CARE Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Establishment Clause; Bill of rights; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; First amendment; Philosophy; Linguistics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.02493831321886555,"score_gpt":0.2755818411728401,"score_spread":0.2506435279539746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551668827","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04673191,0.16039903,0.017704686,0.5319672,0.043445952,0.00666445,0.00074736064,0.0010023137,0.19133708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892348,0.0073074717,0.00021227256,0.0014488652,0.000896246,0.00012073685,0.00002905601,0.000009331416,0.0007412434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99586713,0.00035788555,0.0006525222,0.00044484105,0.0010912064,0.001586428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712515,0.0013138751,0.00031996955,0.00034393443,0.00042941593,0.00046767693],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014140154,0.0004421615,0.00038849167,0.000061199346,0.019637913,0.00089082203,0.00055119616,0.00023485592,0.000102364866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008987595,0.00026984487,0.0001781125,0.00041903168,0.015643125,0.0022953926,0.0003031021,0.0005601795,0.00005368571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003458444,0.00002848834,0.02121732,0.000010569397,0.00014467759,0.0000072641883,0.0014053647,0.000040598818,0.00002390779,0.96281546,0.011683698,0.0025880386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000712622,0.00001293625,0.0010722615,0.00021137898,0.000092466245,0.00008737685,0.07041894,0.000036572423,0.000047050813,0.0012503227,0.92561835,0.00043974948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.094449274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4838969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96156514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001353728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002973736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553045836","doi":"","title":"The Legal Regulation of Adult Personal Relationships: Evaluating Policy Objectives and Legal Options in Federal Legislation","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Autonomy; Normative; Legislation; State (computer science); Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.04886430361492319,"score_gpt":0.3609186599814375,"score_spread":0.31205435636651435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553045836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9008088,0.00016431432,0.000018590848,0.011565667,0.00004020666,0.00032976814,0.0000025922243,0.00003451118,0.08703554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869232,0.00019875809,0.0007797721,0.00003324871,0.00021698618,0.000025025416,0.0000036385554,0.0000046214063,0.0118147535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839455,0.00053300196,0.00027032365,0.00016928812,0.00040900527,0.0002238122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991254,0.00048180055,0.00008991331,0.00005832666,0.00020158915,0.000042963067],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008707908,0.000089084926,0.000112639915,0.00004948043,0.0023822128,0.00016311294,0.00007298688,0.00007805724,0.00011045016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013238697,0.00006404723,0.000047111458,0.00036544818,0.0004459218,0.00073839206,0.000018680132,0.0001692397,0.0000066227126],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095062285,0.000072414114,0.06361214,0.000008777127,0.000046038986,4.3735005e-7,0.12855585,0.00093785295,0.0005688696,0.7497861,0.00024307542,0.056073368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000399208,0.000039355127,0.9458071,0.000026693173,0.000008332265,0.0000011701179,0.042737167,0.005338149,0.000018695308,0.002947183,0.00255404,0.00012292454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049010962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06024721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88219494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023388163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014379673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99891657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553136995","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v33i3.12146","title":"THE PURPOSE AND AMBIT OF THE OFFENCE OF CONCEALMENT OF BIRTH S v Molefe 2012 (2) SACR 574 (GNP)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Dignity; Political science; Statutory law; Statute; Context (archaeology); Constitution; Memorandum; Criminology; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.01943973870665325,"score_gpt":0.2838164968300847,"score_spread":0.2643767581234314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553136995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860029,0.0038655489,0.000003544566,0.0036156496,0.00020115197,0.00022245811,0.000022190648,0.000005512246,0.0060610436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99499315,0.00062985474,0.00008294777,0.00009999761,0.00003505858,0.0000075363887,3.411616e-7,0.0000030917263,0.00414805],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990223,0.00017608613,0.00020399882,0.00010715187,0.00033395083,0.00015650979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922633,0.0002193603,0.00016449638,0.00015782105,0.00019975578,0.00003225312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029822864,0.000066332286,0.00016250125,0.0000052413498,0.0002774206,0.000016761122,0.00019176281,0.000040594645,0.000091377835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018738804,0.000033857268,0.00007347758,0.00015358756,0.00096647366,0.000079929225,0.00012852035,0.000065725566,0.0000021512624],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011441684,0.0004375219,0.3623987,0.00045797287,0.0005867332,0.000008261757,0.35653418,0.000023914565,0.11652441,0.09704438,0.0218937,0.043975793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075315556,0.00009314448,0.5004286,0.00024301193,0.00008678395,0.0000014468665,0.049373854,0.00001722444,0.07748214,0.0013394301,0.36992088,0.00026032876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016953709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016239447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3480272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029105813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051240237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35610124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553239706","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00664.x","title":"ELIJAH AND ISHMAEL","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04656544069678336,"score_gpt":0.3466051547816502,"score_spread":0.30003971408486685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553239706","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027019974,0.81038374,0.00003037906,0.082487896,0.00039418665,0.0009744164,0.000006910225,0.00016913108,0.078533374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14982764,0.83993316,0.00076164684,0.0077486853,0.0002607689,0.000042800042,0.000002514799,0.000009259892,0.0014135283],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898386,0.00009202522,0.00017699732,0.00018556342,0.0003094248,0.0002521367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995668,0.000055037446,0.000060263133,0.00010334309,0.00010120137,0.000113385286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052270835,0.00010902181,0.00027047668,0.000009277501,0.0005133366,0.00004365438,0.00014798057,0.000055978115,0.00006562869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037095053,0.00008093355,0.000072661125,0.0001761283,0.0002390366,0.00014547123,0.000056733028,0.00011462858,0.00023163922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009180082,0.00024948842,0.0062345318,0.004157981,0.00027044353,0.000063487474,0.0389517,0.0000056936788,0.0003967209,0.1327551,0.4345751,0.38233054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013979299,0.00001321867,0.015373539,0.0012814167,0.0000428541,8.090253e-7,0.0010854133,1.8080088e-7,0.0000019695922,0.00075761415,0.9811596,0.00014356915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036229764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005440067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5465845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013188699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062441526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54768807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554265050","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1188","title":"How Can There Be Any Sin in Sincere?: State Inquiries into Sincerity of Religious Belief","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sincerity; Supreme court; Plaintiff; Law; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Charter; Jurisprudence; Political science; Establishment Clause; Sociology; First amendment; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03357084138449772,"score_gpt":0.32650249332713077,"score_spread":0.29293165194263304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554265050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5969081,0.20813625,0.000011536382,0.18051732,0.0010660266,0.0027408525,0.000102050086,0.00021645607,0.010301452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89518684,0.10253115,0.000499252,0.0012135848,0.00014164735,0.00005557001,0.000009475008,0.000018258,0.0003441974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975442,0.00039131514,0.0004958766,0.00037661495,0.00067424687,0.0005177123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985713,0.0001853995,0.00028641085,0.0003720118,0.00042253005,0.00016237606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012725947,0.0002671614,0.0007591335,0.000024797466,0.0005005641,0.0001073501,0.0005469648,0.00014529837,0.0001041073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009345991,0.00020702045,0.00017491913,0.00043768447,0.0026088606,0.00034491275,0.00017506865,0.00043908964,0.0000101237265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012688854,0.0012793913,0.07538295,0.018366644,0.00063598575,0.00013702805,0.281067,0.000010055772,0.008878315,0.40042338,0.078092895,0.13559945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023057456,0.000050196722,0.0016056591,0.0013781429,0.000054914453,9.101694e-7,0.0018373937,0.0000012067993,0.00033847487,0.004542127,0.9896053,0.00035511728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05811432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47516957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9115124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022336346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019583858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9612456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555512450","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Legal Traditions in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Ethnology; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.032543978217943276,"score_gpt":0.27495295135436754,"score_spread":0.24240897313642426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555512450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8557892,0.00010753522,0.0000044738676,0.0016600268,0.0005061968,0.00051607314,0.00004892957,0.00003047166,0.1413371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99345845,0.000107679276,0.0003978108,0.0002042615,0.00021047989,0.0000062413246,0.00002485713,0.0000073053325,0.0055829287],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973383,0.00052042323,0.00032978502,0.00044806988,0.00081740244,0.00054600625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904954,0.0001934596,0.000140472,0.00019131832,0.00017231707,0.00025287416],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008263414,0.00019732842,0.00028389617,0.00018399407,0.0032204655,0.0004550036,0.0013089342,0.0001590113,0.00015816733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020796283,0.00022771615,0.00006989278,0.00088060193,0.00041944522,0.0037349586,0.00017285971,0.00078886567,0.000028048344],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028596964,0.00082384073,0.72265375,0.000031717776,0.00013085993,0.0021341522,0.064885415,0.011496636,0.0003358887,0.19132552,0.0025994997,0.003296772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094134966,0.000016630216,0.32054314,0.000107020875,0.00001552307,0.0000125496035,0.015490084,0.000019026704,0.000073760755,0.00010116591,0.6623055,0.0003742811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96502054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.659706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013946054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056593237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555998629","doi":"","title":"Notes Towards a (Re)Definition of the 'Secular'","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularization; Secularism; Judgement; Secular education; Multiculturalism; Supreme court; Law; Secular state; Religious freedom; Sociology; Economic Justice; Political science; Economic freedom","score_opus":0.02489225236138337,"score_gpt":0.28958999143954367,"score_spread":0.2646977390781603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555998629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9368361,0.0032092645,0.000050701667,0.014457864,0.00019202133,0.00017850615,0.0000028543723,0.000028218512,0.045044437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99038076,0.0077580363,0.00007188506,0.00012643845,0.00029166232,0.000003941365,4.5705596e-7,0.000006530389,0.0013602988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778414,0.00024137147,0.00020019796,0.00010100406,0.0005076117,0.0011656675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995752,0.00006163054,0.00011765292,0.00008585276,0.00011222469,0.000047462498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012326335,0.00009243053,0.00013893985,0.000016894704,0.0010068348,0.000039874954,0.0003266313,0.00007263088,0.0004716207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027993173,0.000057039757,0.00019072852,0.00023150127,0.00027286191,0.00014739201,0.000023752846,0.00077368884,0.000032358654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085220716,0.00020265058,0.0060299006,0.00001245396,0.00048384588,0.0000026626071,0.06292891,0.00005530962,0.00078087975,0.74233395,0.00065918243,0.18642505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014040018,0.00032973933,0.035734553,0.00011058677,0.00019706665,0.00006781594,0.06851671,0.00001407051,0.0007629216,0.8305645,0.061751045,0.0005469743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051200357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0154472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18587808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074104784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008946505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86199003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556327190","doi":"","title":"Dad, Mom – and Mom: The Ontario Court of Appeal's Decision in A.A. v. B.B.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Jurisdiction; Victory; Political science; Court decision; High Court; Lesbian; Sociology; Humanities; Philosophy; Gender studies; Politics","score_opus":0.01897014777385567,"score_gpt":0.2812256256466143,"score_spread":0.2622554778727586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556327190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893349,0.004191725,0.00011593,0.0034138858,0.000117111544,0.0001582496,5.255151e-7,0.000008357447,0.0026593623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98431325,0.013132318,0.00008672744,0.000047468853,0.00013315777,0.0000031260938,2.7669512e-7,0.000005580687,0.0022781002],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783224,0.00015554464,0.00026473016,0.00013107332,0.00047348774,0.0011429017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943805,0.00018225913,0.00014203953,0.000078273166,0.00009630557,0.00006310398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018666993,0.000103113205,0.00019856538,0.00004010459,0.0010014875,0.000028388442,0.00027256564,0.00007465793,0.000034678833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020334193,0.00006398693,0.000070117305,0.00018446833,0.0004008546,0.00018262095,0.000056168625,0.0011138967,0.000006232894],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024524223,0.0002260942,0.57868797,0.0000067897377,0.00029053987,0.00002822512,0.2464981,0.00012262876,0.0002315987,0.1177807,0.002002246,0.05387986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002609705,0.00045392272,0.6223,0.00010472937,0.00006849385,0.00031471756,0.09884305,0.000043521435,0.000052675387,0.17765391,0.09705053,0.00050473487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12187118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7727021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6508309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015669247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012898496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88397634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556405244","doi":"","title":"Review of Elizabeth A. Sheehy, Ed, Sexual Assault in Canada: Law, Legal Practice and Women's Activism (Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2012)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Law; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Medicine; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control","score_opus":0.015264574689944228,"score_gpt":0.2724021358382428,"score_spread":0.25713756114829855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556405244","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42887968,0.48918757,0.00012234542,0.02864024,0.0006526871,0.0012260664,0.000044468263,0.000043067674,0.051203866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87983376,0.11852501,0.000099315046,0.0002293048,0.00009920633,0.00000148334,0.0000013771443,0.000009070342,0.0012014507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674225,0.0007050486,0.00032462343,0.00018616432,0.0007665,0.0012754292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842644,0.00021514951,0.00051363546,0.00009936161,0.0005444509,0.00020098228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046057203,0.00014367446,0.000422925,0.000025156736,0.00028957904,0.000019283143,0.00031241865,0.00008680655,0.000025981011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096001953,0.00012857324,0.00004066015,0.00020100758,0.00029566803,0.000913674,0.000080966616,0.0011524028,0.0000012641661],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007043723,0.00094545865,0.01964664,0.001966413,0.0024889924,0.00014660791,0.06439545,0.00012313381,0.0002775611,0.7065762,0.16166514,0.04106398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011820736,0.00025685396,0.0015718454,0.00037029138,0.00011320953,0.000040584535,0.1514157,0.000006408682,0.00001165567,0.0012422921,0.84352094,0.0002681494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9479391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98544204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70533395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005511251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010404644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556582867","doi":"","title":"Gregory J. Zubacz, Le secret sacramentel et le droit canadien","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.02440750287928169,"score_gpt":0.268893358091003,"score_spread":0.2444858552117213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556582867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70155686,0.02095797,0.00016229102,0.055276204,0.0032110224,0.00087485625,0.00014460513,0.00021067738,0.21760552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92748016,0.0020861104,0.00096360326,0.0011349911,0.002390051,0.000082203886,0.00004367063,0.00006260232,0.06575662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585766,0.0005272644,0.0005222036,0.0005331318,0.000491691,0.0020680376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979205,0.00028552744,0.0003052564,0.00040089374,0.00016568428,0.0009221286],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014091462,0.00035165402,0.0006507156,0.00006588707,0.0012474377,0.00015761988,0.00062836125,0.00046988006,0.0006634106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004152284,0.0005133393,0.00038263857,0.00057380245,0.0009755663,0.0011881627,0.00023253885,0.0006767633,0.00090290443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023875766,0.00059894833,0.041401178,0.00037535452,0.00039146442,0.000090706715,0.08396859,0.00008921238,0.00024068689,0.8327995,0.019866915,0.02015356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001419499,0.00015918036,0.077688426,0.000537113,0.00030395784,0.0001371541,0.049403805,0.0003598075,0.00029611294,0.031620942,0.83634955,0.0017244712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2726951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09907275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8164826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002474821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046213745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556595640","doi":"","title":"Physicians and Marriage Commissioners: Accommodation of Differing Beliefs in a Free and Democratic Society","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Accommodation; Democracy; Dissent; Free Exercise Clause; Law; Political science; Opt-out; Constitutional right; Freedom of choice; Constitution; First amendment; Psychology; Business; Politics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.015928948629520042,"score_gpt":0.269508878975938,"score_spread":0.25357993034641796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556595640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98916966,0.005329285,0.00022753028,0.0045348387,0.000044822787,0.000115222596,0.0000011670787,0.000011733894,0.000565762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771067,0.021942686,0.00025658513,0.000046763227,0.00012381238,0.0000029280934,4.782774e-7,0.0000056141903,0.00051445945],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867,0.000118100616,0.00017590926,0.00010142894,0.00021849823,0.0007160669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996632,0.00008144801,0.00011243621,0.000054703134,0.000041635296,0.000046583806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007120747,0.00008432436,0.00017486974,0.000022508544,0.0007460697,0.000021638805,0.00012407548,0.000060621456,0.000004177175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013150235,0.00007075319,0.000050185965,0.00013011972,0.00038338313,0.00027837255,0.00006349295,0.0005736097,2.8536266e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084617765,0.00046706843,0.29372704,0.00013244413,0.00060350285,0.000013271463,0.44983098,0.00005725531,0.008892857,0.13409467,0.0024719976,0.1096243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004133406,0.00037658328,0.38534003,0.00038328485,0.000084457875,0.00011839491,0.26761368,0.0004885516,0.00022492043,0.338746,0.0018170723,0.0006735819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017609759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006012669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20465134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039876215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019753352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57382405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560096757","doi":"10.24908/jcri.v1i1.3549","title":"Intersectionality: Crossing the Theoretical and Praxis Divide","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Critical Race Inquiry","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Intersectionality; Praxis; Appeal; Gender studies; Sociology; Power (physics); Intersection (aeronautics); Subject (documents); Vulnerability (computing); Criminology; Political science; Law; Politics; Geography; Computer security","score_opus":0.08625279896368111,"score_gpt":0.40141269945415575,"score_spread":0.31515990049047465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560096757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92640525,0.0010862328,0.0026363397,0.059791498,0.0014999736,0.00010545604,0.0000014709987,0.000021016094,0.008452791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99710274,0.00008077549,0.0009461155,0.0006833154,0.0011002033,0.0000019586487,4.0407024e-8,0.000005422796,0.00007942541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836683,0.0004207505,0.00033090013,0.000102145445,0.00050961843,0.00026976343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762315,0.0016188107,0.00009762711,0.000067184264,0.00040965676,0.00018358201],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018788787,0.000089722824,0.00019202843,0.000023431905,0.0011763398,0.00023075611,0.00021518348,0.00008520133,0.00037704632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009081257,0.000050606657,0.00011269975,0.00009693384,0.009841245,0.00044146716,0.000100096986,0.00040283706,0.000008184153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010377869,0.000139727,0.0050755483,0.000020993846,0.000067295725,0.000042241893,0.23642734,2.970446e-7,0.0000999317,0.7493849,0.0022222921,0.006415671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067104754,0.0004497737,0.10470507,0.00025881123,0.00026955514,0.00018810875,0.2637752,0.000019539062,0.00045297877,0.5674007,0.06139767,0.0004115258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016505194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006380154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18198417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000892612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008381971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560846001","doi":"","title":"Rule 17 - Service Outside Ontario","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Service (business); Business; Operations management; Engineering; Marketing","score_opus":0.02064223474017416,"score_gpt":0.2885842520871835,"score_spread":0.26794201734700934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560846001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8687326,0.0020693035,0.00014306685,0.025547054,0.00046836966,0.00019607715,7.8943896e-7,0.0000987915,0.10274396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91509795,0.0037724976,0.00010230016,0.0007419152,0.0009409556,0.0000064799524,0.0000015880541,0.000013794934,0.07932251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620163,0.00014451126,0.00023423234,0.00018431131,0.0005343306,0.0027009668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932265,0.000057098296,0.00013801793,0.00009930632,0.00021989811,0.00016299867],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00155767,0.00015413285,0.00019568848,0.0000362867,0.0018057673,0.00014545115,0.0004179013,0.00010576189,0.00058719964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010558217,0.00012491521,0.00012670283,0.00027263045,0.00010366933,0.0003915411,0.000053897136,0.0016258983,0.00025857345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024788952,0.00045526956,0.28727975,0.000011789338,0.0013704334,0.00009466681,0.26965702,0.00016015375,0.00041838235,0.36610174,0.012939747,0.06126316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007928197,0.00010918505,0.03036576,0.000023371327,0.00007147521,0.0001353101,0.06772488,0.00000505036,0.000010125738,0.12010915,0.7802334,0.00041946673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3187838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9629862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76729363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005393285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026967777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560995469","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1255","title":"Supreme Court of Canada Equality Jurisprudence and “Everyday Life”","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Rhetoric; Conversation; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.059142146847460095,"score_gpt":0.34073004177769567,"score_spread":0.28158789493023556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560995469","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078704774,0.7815113,0.000035841098,0.05125598,0.0018514855,0.002673975,0.00016443069,0.00016349688,0.08363868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9321717,0.06379967,0.00021185269,0.0025865156,0.00031204676,0.000036188078,0.00000535716,0.0000134776,0.0008631807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968485,0.00056618656,0.00056997174,0.00027606796,0.0010132734,0.0007259672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982356,0.0003432229,0.00027104898,0.00029150935,0.00036447358,0.00049415557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002550924,0.00023609443,0.00071078754,0.000009776387,0.000701408,0.000033903976,0.00038841114,0.000096167074,0.00051261415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012750981,0.00018690241,0.00012089915,0.00023899258,0.0006364097,0.0004811309,0.00017703277,0.00019662028,0.000020270594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030415436,0.00034149,0.099155776,0.01036223,0.0005449127,0.0000085804195,0.019779623,0.000002033755,0.00025561618,0.45445126,0.40946802,0.005600037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012278312,0.000013264711,0.012668681,0.0009784875,0.000121172176,0.0000011293874,0.00066552334,0.0000011394649,0.00005096494,0.000117471754,0.984974,0.0002853719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6704554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62009233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8534669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030760156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048480462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76216596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565536381","doi":"10.7202/1071732ar","title":"Indian Rights for Indian Babies: Canada’s “Unstated Paternity” Policy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"First Peoples Child & Family Review An Interdisciplinary Journal Honouring the Voices Perspectives and Knowledges of First Peoples","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Algonquin College","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Charter; Law; Political science; Legislature; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Criminology; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.020530530683793062,"score_gpt":0.3114544653807892,"score_spread":0.2909239346969961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565536381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76689416,0.11326454,0.000014913678,0.115365915,0.00044147577,0.0014183343,0.00029124948,0.00008790146,0.0022215096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8722417,0.12512285,0.00012104706,0.0003547505,0.0019018311,0.00006230478,0.00001805181,0.000041495234,0.00013599127],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965032,0.0004380396,0.00096392614,0.00066617026,0.00057151576,0.0008571678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99635714,0.0011244061,0.0008528573,0.00032687065,0.0006350803,0.0007036223],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008392407,0.0005931487,0.0011092359,0.0001604489,0.008788342,0.0003602616,0.0013491069,0.00013922932,0.00007719391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010260576,0.00039269813,0.0004789162,0.00060400116,0.00087071594,0.0007828174,0.0007286276,0.0006671024,0.000007342181],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000206675,0.00022862174,0.006785019,0.0038046532,0.00051332085,0.000026454964,0.97842675,0.000035248686,0.0000053259614,0.0010692738,0.007637254,0.0012614282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001047605,0.0009914485,0.0929694,0.0096813105,0.00035285507,0.00009045427,0.7743838,0.000040664112,0.000025369536,0.0007380666,0.11865355,0.0010255195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1309685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9463215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.815353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060019066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565657572","doi":"","title":"Palliative Care: An Enforceable Canadian Human Right?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Palliative care; Human rights; Section (typography); Political science; Law; Medicine; Law and economics; Nursing; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.03656560940039169,"score_gpt":0.3094735965687212,"score_spread":0.27290798716832954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565657572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59101325,0.0038523504,0.000070589864,0.001199916,0.0005481406,0.0004295407,0.000007682561,0.00010946684,0.40276903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932384,0.0011774872,0.00009524551,0.00009772537,0.00052764924,0.000007953841,0.0000041437625,0.0000143720035,0.004837028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960318,0.00020294229,0.00020380171,0.00019464678,0.00035878472,0.0030080096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999054,0.0000179122,0.00012191281,0.00010822126,0.00026125603,0.00043665955],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009907394,0.0001573522,0.00017638592,0.00007231809,0.0043795463,0.00010128755,0.00048027906,0.0001243898,0.0006098623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000713256,0.00012636819,0.00010259156,0.00018807073,0.0002465522,0.0004768207,0.00002166352,0.001153272,0.00007973908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000079223555,0.00002527642,0.012264316,0.000002052112,0.00013849285,0.00000993725,0.14720872,0.0000016406373,0.000023885998,0.83715725,0.00019070756,0.002969818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008981759,0.00073905947,0.03082629,0.000029666035,0.00011309424,0.000013496531,0.53150976,0.0000040955765,0.00017195773,0.24870855,0.18615773,0.0008281075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.788632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98953617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5884487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005467208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002783398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566766146","doi":"10.7202/1071795ar","title":"From the House of Commons Resolution to Pictou Landing Band Council and Maurina Beadle v. Canada: An Update on the Implementation of Jordan’s Principle","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"First Peoples Child & Family Review An Interdisciplinary Journal Honouring the Voices Perspectives and Knowledges of First Peoples","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Commons; Political science; Resolution (logic); Law; Library science; Geography; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Parliament","score_opus":0.028900113840186228,"score_gpt":0.31901894963608207,"score_spread":0.29011883579589587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1566766146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9379208,0.03442294,0.000016958033,0.026274309,0.00017034927,0.00059910986,0.0001274485,0.000016549684,0.00045154095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9482034,0.051069416,0.000074393975,0.00009064007,0.00048993685,0.000025826437,0.0000048884904,0.00002085117,0.000020666223],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743325,0.0006429374,0.00065413106,0.00033870898,0.0005957137,0.00033528954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966901,0.0015898969,0.00070785504,0.00038234875,0.00047047407,0.00015934453],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002054832,0.00028528465,0.00059637096,0.000047859266,0.003940104,0.00012984987,0.00077095727,0.00005010935,0.000032867807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005067555,0.00014972257,0.00015362371,0.00024173423,0.0005957591,0.0003403313,0.0004894945,0.0003253197,9.974361e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023138005,0.00029002494,0.061104394,0.00084809103,0.00039685954,0.0000015914479,0.9253447,0.00014444461,0.000060491384,0.005215386,0.0047675734,0.0015950821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035066615,0.00048519677,0.5148092,0.0036541894,0.00020046273,0.000008527622,0.46653563,0.000054650965,0.000044502347,0.00027512846,0.01335388,0.00022796146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15270813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95069265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7979845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040388398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002580781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99735665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568629683","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1097","title":"Book Review: The Best Interests of Children: An Evidence-Based Approach, by Paul Millar","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03499304200246577,"score_gpt":0.3174868482580874,"score_spread":0.2824938062556216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568629683","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022494342,0.8162115,0.00014937107,0.073719814,0.0012598973,0.0017702009,0.000058486286,0.00010465305,0.08423173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93373513,0.055731382,0.00066146895,0.00850565,0.0007660095,0.00001982904,0.000007932227,0.000019269637,0.00055333885],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975194,0.0006012685,0.0004461698,0.00023148012,0.0007900106,0.00041167674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849707,0.00021710373,0.0004114614,0.00028429233,0.00033494254,0.0002551169],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017279275,0.00019880822,0.00034245773,0.000016224427,0.0018073935,0.00016964464,0.0009175025,0.00013445159,0.00046738613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006147689,0.000115996365,0.00022471554,0.0001478394,0.0010327952,0.0006418793,0.00007384673,0.0008178465,0.000026089589],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007329917,0.000850268,0.0066989902,0.00025856838,0.00034446994,0.0000147119445,0.008440361,0.000024431174,0.0029447428,0.027543914,0.94075745,0.012048779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008452563,0.00038837636,0.0019377965,0.0023088353,0.00035907194,0.00008159617,0.0033316452,0.00004671958,0.0013281148,0.00091586774,0.9877399,0.0007167713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03141795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043110535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91124076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007502891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000081410166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569182112","doi":"","title":"Facets of sovereignty. Institutions that Spur and Institutions that Retard Tribal Development","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Business; Indigenous; Negotiation; Market economy; Bond; Realm; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.168513268777627,"score_gpt":0.3896729111650689,"score_spread":0.2211596423874419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569182112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71192425,0.0008894759,0.000009414338,0.001212517,0.0005515838,0.001533194,0.0001140156,0.00006202228,0.28370354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729552,0.024392564,0.0011576542,0.000035173223,0.0001278792,0.0002113693,0.00004682545,0.000017423843,0.0010558699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968257,0.0003318325,0.0005789434,0.0007761147,0.000636416,0.0008510219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847335,0.00036063464,0.00026321202,0.00041404134,0.00020206945,0.00028671493],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017912278,0.0003289791,0.00065863685,0.000274731,0.0015798337,0.00019433517,0.00068760675,0.00057466025,0.00010115109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010764202,0.0003207609,0.00016899341,0.00018758817,0.0028402088,0.00029134852,0.0014133531,0.0013034677,0.000011297396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031514844,0.0014018468,0.19035436,0.0013990354,0.0019443063,0.000117108284,0.19154286,0.037187263,0.00013337196,0.28807953,0.0002859048,0.28723925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035305691,0.00013524639,0.31883886,0.0021272334,0.000094612034,0.000010610369,0.07130481,0.00015183649,0.0011597734,0.013893404,0.5864254,0.0023276214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041928925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018856768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5861395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036585927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004577427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569251853","doi":"","title":"The Legal Genealogy of the Duty to Accommodate American and Canadian Workers with Disabilities: A Comparative Perspective","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Duty; Reasonable accommodation; Political science; Doctrine; Accommodation; Argument (complex analysis); Free Exercise Clause; Judicial interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Human rights; Sociology; First amendment; Supreme court; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03794136313233012,"score_gpt":0.3216593455414917,"score_spread":0.28371798240916163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569251853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8977381,0.000045458506,0.00000982884,0.003968564,0.00020463103,0.0006608298,0.00002725956,0.000010346793,0.097334996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99765444,0.000012940586,0.0002528743,0.00013043643,0.000053682204,0.0000033407216,0.0000015912358,0.0000040646614,0.0018866138],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980302,0.0005425802,0.00018891977,0.00033190232,0.0004885442,0.00041788886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832726,0.00060449704,0.00015418993,0.00021800879,0.00041263935,0.00028342256],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012704695,0.00015133529,0.00024180517,0.000085050626,0.0051483866,0.00035815898,0.0011222938,0.00008961615,0.000008385226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005310565,0.00010325962,0.000053428765,0.0009193672,0.0038051934,0.0009373569,0.0003998154,0.0005609862,0.000002651803],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047081264,0.00006618102,0.6582842,0.00000394153,0.00011120668,0.000030347093,0.08075429,0.00042487623,0.0000491668,0.2594117,0.00016490344,0.00022838102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029645523,0.00005088264,0.566582,0.00005669326,0.000018369232,0.000004315701,0.34117782,0.0000021683943,0.000050363546,0.000116379284,0.09149214,0.00015239739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76051927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94047683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2604235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003233373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013165065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569342319","doi":"","title":"From Same-Sex to No Sex? Trends Towards Recognition of (Same-Sex) Relationships in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle journal for social justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Lesbian; Politics; Gender studies; Citizenship; Sociology; Inclusion (mineral); Space (punctuation); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.11429887837325639,"score_gpt":0.34382111043300456,"score_spread":0.22952223205974817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569342319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89241576,0.0007672428,0.0002722283,0.03258246,0.0061635077,0.0008083328,0.0010903593,0.000073624535,0.065826476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764822,0.0002721705,0.0019478756,0.0005610675,0.0040364168,0.00003302547,0.00002700729,0.0000260471,0.016614197],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760157,0.00040206301,0.0005172925,0.00022802809,0.00073882623,0.00051224633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822676,0.0007554846,0.000274223,0.00007265902,0.00043057668,0.00024029131],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077848934,0.00017578923,0.00039249883,0.00009371192,0.0017376791,0.00008478134,0.00027312717,0.00016875687,0.0007824242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002298722,0.00016843496,0.00015541406,0.00051686144,0.00012803386,0.0002779603,0.00004450921,0.00049539085,0.00004061947],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016163614,0.00025638985,0.009426227,0.000117415664,0.00028774352,0.000030103218,0.41534182,0.00021714893,0.0002703098,0.0005313363,0.3160084,0.25735146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002708388,0.00024239082,0.053643864,0.00023570089,0.00087081845,0.0000043964324,0.6459291,0.00053818926,0.00027701733,0.0036160045,0.2907783,0.0011558176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76244646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8616062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25619563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019671419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039453627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1571061836","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal Title and Section 88 of the Indian Act","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Supreme court; Law; Jurisdiction; Principal (computer security); Section (typography); Constitution; Federal jurisdiction; Political science; Power (physics); Business","score_opus":0.012835001518208228,"score_gpt":0.31061121143121995,"score_spread":0.29777620991301174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1571061836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5796002,0.000024574065,1.3756149e-7,0.00068335136,0.000065131375,0.000027010527,3.9167196e-7,0.0000069314306,0.41959226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9602482,0.00011238542,0.000024317811,0.000033767137,0.000084624815,6.022832e-7,5.645876e-8,6.203682e-7,0.03949548],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998392,0.000014581555,0.000021146107,0.000025960611,0.000060474445,0.000038651237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999479,0.000008840064,0.0000071152426,0.000017421651,0.000008745305,0.00000996267],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000039241728,0.000014247634,0.000021127522,0.0000021260582,0.000137372,0.0000068113254,0.000026550306,0.000016307267,0.0027250242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005360797,0.0000077149425,0.000009894151,0.00004384253,0.00007767558,0.000026227719,0.0000021049348,0.000021887474,0.000048203685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017575887,0.00009071063,0.18626991,0.000033449745,0.00009375374,0.0000015586452,0.2984819,0.000005766518,0.00076861377,0.056096427,0.17307076,0.28506956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027085496,0.000003367135,0.09063449,0.0000021399962,0.0000022265203,1.05066036e-7,0.0013321283,8.1485547e-7,0.00007832166,0.0001119436,0.90778726,0.00002008913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045227935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022370338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73471653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013953331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008877494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99818665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1571323056","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1259","title":"(Ab)Originalism and Canada’s Constitution","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Constitution; Treaty; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional interpretation; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Relation (database); Law of the land; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04329375384612381,"score_gpt":0.3276469139933314,"score_spread":0.2843531601472076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1571323056","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010385774,0.6614399,0.000012370797,0.045923665,0.0015744432,0.0012156244,0.000027251368,0.00011490406,0.27930608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87531555,0.11965227,0.00015030992,0.003657334,0.00042715835,0.000028211298,0.000006170022,0.000004631687,0.0007583778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879074,0.00017036917,0.0001753349,0.00012741607,0.00036731097,0.00036883538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999441,0.00007122936,0.00006790785,0.00009603035,0.000117564385,0.00020622894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006815359,0.00011185189,0.00025114277,0.0000043826617,0.00078813656,0.000028998164,0.00011038606,0.000042857875,0.00026451566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002267965,0.00008553202,0.00004239684,0.00007027363,0.00046808488,0.00029908752,0.00004018786,0.0000952174,0.000037996604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.680587e-7,0.00001399794,0.0056548053,0.0004556678,0.000030624808,0.0000021984001,0.0010368134,5.277804e-8,0.000007507211,0.89943284,0.09147286,0.0018916473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055866178,0.000002893095,0.0013359995,0.000436712,0.00006093697,0.00000221203,0.00024261385,1.4878947e-7,0.0000051792326,0.00005729895,0.997672,0.00012814137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91770166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8961493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90619916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002945442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024636567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6061789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572102169","doi":"","title":"Chapter 9: R v. Gladue: Sentencing and the Gendered Impacts of Colonialism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Colonialism; Criminology; Legislature; Political science; Criminal justice; Gender studies; Intervention (counseling); Sociology; Economic Justice; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.022025082000075226,"score_gpt":0.282097357759439,"score_spread":0.26007227575936376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572102169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98123986,0.007229213,0.000054698008,0.009146083,0.00013454516,0.00017055142,8.627302e-7,0.000014943943,0.002009264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97584456,0.02317639,0.000033254146,0.00010735702,0.00028442606,0.0000022199056,1.5668422e-7,0.0000060019734,0.0005456541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797755,0.00019848482,0.00020812938,0.0001023291,0.00037098222,0.0011424969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941194,0.0001313559,0.00018119506,0.000061322964,0.00013804714,0.00007612516],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019097538,0.00009568895,0.0001976364,0.000023951137,0.0016086276,0.00002846281,0.00017647675,0.000053715623,0.000019940142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003194574,0.000055857254,0.000098321376,0.000098104145,0.00089242024,0.00015727451,0.000041530053,0.00064754236,0.0000035374392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002207513,0.000036854803,0.015316683,0.000007142742,0.00041824084,0.000009904121,0.16668934,0.000004963981,0.0007026404,0.80968845,0.00019277871,0.0067122583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013719228,0.0007158776,0.10095845,0.00009593203,0.00036534952,0.00183446,0.49348262,0.00012213961,0.0005201209,0.35556042,0.031557746,0.00106768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0108251935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016823797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45412803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043623272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055308605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572179965","doi":"","title":"Does No 'No' Mean Reasonable Doubt? Assessing the Impact of Ewanchuk on Determinations of Consent","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Supreme court; Sexual assault; Law; Political science; Psychology; Informed consent; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Medicine","score_opus":0.01802075574261593,"score_gpt":0.34540255653344726,"score_spread":0.32738180079083135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572179965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96587074,0.00063874887,0.000050570543,0.0016445995,0.00024444572,0.0002060642,0.000005923894,0.00001756176,0.03132133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945904,0.0009816003,0.00006288563,0.000011467995,0.00045099188,0.0000036171707,0.0000010550116,0.000007972439,0.0038900326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977026,0.0002916665,0.00031213815,0.00011708333,0.0004902696,0.0010862233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858016,0.0003895005,0.00040592722,0.00010338037,0.000475445,0.000045583813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017699802,0.00012418286,0.00021632985,0.00004011603,0.0010331746,0.00008189201,0.00026888103,0.00006315954,0.00007252483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004887533,0.000057196215,0.00024204561,0.00019294709,0.00043782959,0.00021962823,0.000025825771,0.00061748497,0.0000116627125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039909908,0.0019646238,0.20304279,0.000100780795,0.0027044998,0.00001609051,0.0507207,0.0018451529,0.02876882,0.66388804,0.013186526,0.033362865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005041108,0.0030576864,0.36199683,0.00090989715,0.00065019965,0.00008700414,0.20784266,0.00052366214,0.0052515008,0.391781,0.02115515,0.0017032878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025454013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020365926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27210703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015289967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017441375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99750984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572565470","doi":"","title":"Symes v. Canada","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Shadow (psychology); Political science; Work (physics); Constitutional right; Inequality; Law; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.018840764064398614,"score_gpt":0.23528344492949993,"score_spread":0.21644268086510132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572565470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6737204,0.043220956,0.0000025813754,0.21754839,0.0027102714,0.0002000436,0.00007487167,0.000004586289,0.06251791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94453156,0.000738603,0.000032850876,0.0027285996,0.0014245549,0.0000053005324,0.0000014488206,0.000014989825,0.050522115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977523,0.00039283003,0.00048223816,0.00015311148,0.0002778323,0.00094165164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800795,0.00039864323,0.00036401188,0.00011706501,0.00021885817,0.0008934593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013620947,0.00021512482,0.000542403,0.00004255844,0.0011625999,0.00024065882,0.00041204138,0.00011612489,0.00033671712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019288251,0.0001596488,0.0001432094,0.00025067563,0.0019159786,0.00029097754,0.000029001747,0.00044891975,0.0000086944765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022039849,0.000011421079,0.0027199325,0.0000477031,0.00019759516,0.0002590887,0.04644221,0.00006767488,0.0000011787304,0.9186506,0.029779652,0.0018008546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010781855,0.00005293262,0.006386666,0.00015779975,0.00007879302,0.00013075933,0.02613825,0.000014466064,0.0000045203724,0.06356602,0.9021257,0.00026586498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9941516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99921817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8723461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028955159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023773622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89418966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573318334","doi":"","title":"Judicial reasoning about pregnancy and choice.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Law; Supreme court; Criminal code; Entitlement (fair division); Political science; Abortion law; Legislation; Criminal law; Charter; Criminalization; Sociology; Family planning; Population; Economics","score_opus":0.04733970416552328,"score_gpt":0.28252392936077947,"score_spread":0.2351842251952562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573318334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8506447,0.007703116,0.000005570869,0.0028537933,0.000493729,0.00086719845,0.0000033643514,0.0001942446,0.13723424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920764,0.0019149038,0.00012972661,0.000105765655,0.0005544836,0.0004528334,7.3583095e-7,0.000006373682,0.0047588027],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989138,0.00007608582,0.00011182095,0.00018398374,0.00027544555,0.0004388567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957365,0.000102822814,0.000055384757,0.0000610261,0.000056715682,0.0001503833],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018626727,0.00008475122,0.00013654544,0.00001650018,0.0013713941,0.000042027412,0.000109762965,0.000068618094,0.000021690532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010146762,0.00007142382,0.000037990292,0.00014231006,0.00046693676,0.00021200176,0.00005694556,0.00009680634,0.00001134286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010707179,0.000057426023,0.56196696,0.000018540486,0.000076948476,0.000025674939,0.061316874,0.000001063552,0.000007553833,0.0073322747,0.007211743,0.36197424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018124792,0.0000031014483,0.9247504,0.000018773622,0.000009117628,9.3001853e-7,0.0006976446,0.0000012626904,0.000009796746,0.00011209701,0.07410926,0.000106361025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067824987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002474926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36278343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009405723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020205076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575708530","doi":"","title":"In Search of Canadian Political Theory of Liberal Multiculturalism","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"한국정치학회보","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Multiculturalism; Political philosophy; Communitarianism; Minority rights; Political science; Politics; Liberal democracy; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Epistemology; Democracy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.047927071789806736,"score_gpt":0.3363337737506186,"score_spread":0.28840670196081186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575708530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9538928,0.00011059746,9.856525e-7,0.012202714,0.00012385772,0.00021699826,0.000018748304,0.0000124233875,0.033420876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982539,0.000034474753,0.00041478945,0.00023488197,0.00009797215,0.0000059917397,0.000001936163,0.000004892645,0.00095117703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985594,0.0001715291,0.00022022308,0.00012975224,0.00031164853,0.0006074603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993213,0.00013457266,0.000035382276,0.00008394922,0.00015178393,0.00027303584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005167981,0.000083133345,0.00020209883,0.00013548492,0.00016095245,0.000011272545,0.0002026004,0.00010441932,0.00016309493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004659256,0.000064185755,0.00007063319,0.00048539686,0.0006926936,0.00014875038,0.000036397883,0.00013823247,0.000022059774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011739175,0.00006186029,0.0071501634,0.000020962078,0.000023027873,0.000012129581,0.12973674,0.000043223357,0.0007999162,0.86161846,0.00028436887,0.00023741489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029841047,0.00017173146,0.69988304,0.0002680545,0.000050905714,0.0000034791483,0.19919437,0.000009461104,0.017399257,0.053630505,0.025638074,0.00076700415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87393576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67013276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8079879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005027521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027982643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33588648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579304025","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2012.01446.x","title":"MARRIAGE: CIVIL, RELIGIOUS, CONTRACTUAL, AND MORE*","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marriage law; Law; Family law; Civil law (Civil law); Religious law; Sociology; Judaism; Political science; State (computer science); Public law; Islam; History","score_opus":0.03992372588675457,"score_gpt":0.34675615129486087,"score_spread":0.3068324254081063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579304025","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01859135,0.9246735,0.000009494689,0.022282334,0.0005523072,0.0008983381,0.00001005643,0.00012786136,0.032854747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33172303,0.6606451,0.00019192846,0.0058942954,0.0005001662,0.000053650652,0.000003848495,0.000011101405,0.0009768641],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998332,0.00025011707,0.00027666765,0.00019286935,0.00042922783,0.00051910407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990706,0.00025836332,0.00012365237,0.00016050154,0.00012559588,0.0002613201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013162195,0.0001721927,0.00042913266,0.000013848104,0.0005515004,0.00005552346,0.00018089847,0.000097235694,0.00017244813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009855523,0.00012654655,0.00010098427,0.00017215371,0.00034335206,0.00031458843,0.0000826942,0.0001854301,0.00025890782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003606567,0.00006171591,0.0089674285,0.0006835755,0.000078740755,0.0000049057135,0.015873685,6.256664e-8,0.000060004266,0.0036305322,0.9438106,0.026825175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010756932,0.000009255852,0.03136369,0.00072551356,0.00009224366,0.0000015282839,0.0018135061,4.6547453e-7,0.0000012134375,0.000054359098,0.96564037,0.00019026206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022280074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025950142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3131317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112511116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040621962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5160418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579334152","doi":"10.5040/9781472566461.ch-012","title":"‘Legal Form’ and the Purchase of Human Rights Discourse in Domestic Policy-Making: The Achievement of Same-Sex Marriage in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Gender studies; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02139120272411651,"score_gpt":0.29401274234925645,"score_spread":0.27262153962513996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579334152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06960848,0.0002926699,0.0000030053209,0.015293007,0.00032128044,0.0017162088,0.000101624544,0.00002185443,0.9126419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9311694,0.000009787639,0.000013612609,0.00024963263,0.00030156499,0.000046165387,0.000008377036,0.000019113002,0.06818236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973416,0.00027217087,0.00068302883,0.0003097701,0.00093537825,0.0004580879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815947,0.00070113,0.00059419463,0.00033748403,0.00011806393,0.00008966925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021590113,0.00029571448,0.00067043415,0.0001376617,0.0006940275,0.00036145395,0.0008376639,0.00018119722,0.000034115805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005888352,0.00016214461,0.00011813854,0.000057549016,0.0016646007,0.00027747822,0.0003853936,0.0006761572,5.087849e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023489172,0.000008517541,0.0002459647,0.00004965116,0.000057956247,0.000013675389,0.026353572,0.0000031650547,0.000004819476,0.97049946,0.0017746976,0.0009650123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034434325,0.000090943235,0.0048102364,0.0013476249,0.00016885932,0.000004818175,0.014701307,0.00003973418,0.000024131361,0.14874345,0.82572037,0.00090507854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9782486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9924501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8615609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008475303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074163254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66120654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580151100","doi":"","title":"L.W. van Keuren, Raven, Stay by Me . St. John’s: Jesperson, 2009. ISBN: 1-894377-30-3.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Newfoundland and Labrador Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.046889195593381755,"score_gpt":0.30549101439285214,"score_spread":0.2586018187994704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580151100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7747805,0.10382863,0.000050523275,0.01227988,0.0020071352,0.001334404,0.00032507998,0.00064371945,0.10475009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92247653,0.03680371,0.00063404103,0.0013031029,0.0010779832,0.000084406645,0.000017485612,0.00004729638,0.03755544],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975444,0.00023674428,0.00035311282,0.00055272307,0.000551509,0.00076152105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988877,0.00022103064,0.00017555854,0.00018993646,0.00027220786,0.0002535714],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000528699,0.0003943584,0.00061098207,0.00005139859,0.0022030175,0.00014995913,0.00029340424,0.00016793094,0.00080749986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034969035,0.00028136635,0.00012316572,0.00027010604,0.0011390828,0.0003819558,0.000192812,0.00026250706,0.00012143209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001236947,0.0003211251,0.14373966,0.00014599513,0.001505165,0.00004774445,0.4760471,5.949191e-7,0.00017171523,0.012211965,0.34680802,0.018877223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011458528,0.00021053872,0.035532262,0.000076228906,0.0001654967,0.0000023405994,0.111313686,0.000003423268,0.000035578072,0.0020606816,0.848779,0.0006748866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022189964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028234808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.501971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021799964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004410128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581112853","doi":"10.53300/001c.5617","title":"Faith in the courts: The aggrieved faithful seeking standing in Australia","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.15229791589728242,"score_gpt":0.3931997543679755,"score_spread":0.24090183847069307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581112853","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21055983,0.3744895,0.00001963755,0.18410155,0.0010882039,0.0075941365,0.000026227512,0.00017552615,0.22194542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846234,0.011501535,0.00007652382,0.0028876537,0.00016244828,0.000098104756,0.0000021931814,0.0000068297118,0.00064132945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790454,0.00069529156,0.00031626393,0.0001736313,0.00054576003,0.00036453456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993266,0.0002490222,0.00012560676,0.00017017503,0.000068475274,0.000060117938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041060215,0.00012981288,0.0002955505,0.000009277825,0.0003964312,0.00011843897,0.0004421455,0.000054570562,0.000055916476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006647176,0.000061631166,0.00007314396,0.00042877047,0.00030799524,0.00020698813,0.00006141103,0.00026677462,0.00004962717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001412655,0.000110528876,0.018480763,0.0006753281,0.00004821674,0.00006763622,0.18137704,0.000007898503,0.0000108175245,0.70805585,0.086690255,0.0044615366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018612342,0.000011758295,0.00425244,0.00139934,0.00002549178,0.0000012701942,0.015759774,0.0000021062322,8.5843794e-7,0.0012865909,0.97694105,0.00013318515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03301125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06071854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8902508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002944935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052101608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.973428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1582570262","doi":"10.71781/2161","title":"Le meilleur intérêt de l'enfant, les tests de paternité et le droit civil québécois","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0327861671255256,"score_gpt":0.3348053880837998,"score_spread":0.30201922095827416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1582570262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76558465,0.0014519522,0.000013912866,0.002273009,0.0003406946,0.00069891097,0.00010115372,0.000009767555,0.22952595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9132501,0.00045526313,0.0020793076,0.00012591259,0.00031208803,0.00013495485,0.00042810486,0.000051723622,0.08316254],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996578,0.00063607097,0.00058609876,0.00074274,0.0005416597,0.0009154551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983639,0.00036152193,0.000524111,0.00023991271,0.0002642141,0.00024633782],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010454723,0.0005140108,0.0007024223,0.000058961446,0.0020336316,0.00067920744,0.0012525009,0.0006466355,0.0011064974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000449006,0.0005129587,0.00026914757,0.00037986538,0.00048570446,0.00061406003,0.00027272254,0.0005682701,0.00044417486],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016809716,0.0015222284,0.11746634,0.00025649217,0.00079789263,0.00017587713,0.61232907,0.00036425068,0.00817901,0.021092251,0.0072037955,0.23044468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010320967,0.000107672204,0.28128663,0.0005350639,0.00024631972,0.000006733599,0.20843829,0.00007527496,0.003869164,0.00090194447,0.50225264,0.0012481817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9235014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.968402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49504885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073236047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022715838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586201112","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1739864","title":"The End of Umpire? Federalism and Judicial Restraint","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Law; Judicial restraint; Law and economics; Criminology; Psychology; Judicial review; Judicial activism; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.011636174354481423,"score_gpt":0.2816661873796392,"score_spread":0.2700300130251578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586201112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9479518,0.009649218,0.00005134312,0.02531466,0.00025908664,0.00016184275,0.0000016950695,0.000022682154,0.016587697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897437,0.007259014,0.000024591767,0.00003434559,0.0007894265,0.0000024191593,3.6228326e-7,0.000005475159,0.0021406517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782866,0.00017935013,0.00022582624,0.000098242715,0.00038045744,0.0012874589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949116,0.00015189814,0.00015796995,0.000049428145,0.00010375305,0.00004578013],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018939503,0.00008584377,0.00012992197,0.000016422246,0.0023921428,0.00011146271,0.00018425359,0.000059608246,0.000011752528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017558788,0.000053489824,0.00007300372,0.00009590874,0.00074718415,0.00011093549,0.00003139923,0.00065263786,0.0000026250102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019602641,0.00001930615,0.0023588082,0.0000014278735,0.000066136636,0.0000014266234,0.003342227,0.0000032232472,0.0002564426,0.9735938,0.0006014931,0.019736135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006029218,0.00014486435,0.038872465,0.000017981412,0.000045178527,0.00003735521,0.040009726,0.000005764797,0.0000914414,0.8393321,0.08063525,0.00020495562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018524664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13185024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13426168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005394434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068510434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586503665","doi":"","title":"L’évolution de la notion de conjoint en droit québécois","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007447764174238666,"score_gpt":0.19952034707720712,"score_spread":0.19207258290296844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586503665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78181803,0.027028302,0.0012628433,0.0032561005,0.0014471106,0.00034727185,0.00002813384,0.00014982317,0.1846624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9500486,0.0025084326,0.0016571683,0.00020662475,0.000434447,0.000018096725,0.000009277446,0.000016591024,0.04510074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657613,0.0013236571,0.00029839255,0.0004421969,0.0006112342,0.0007483703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998448,0.0004759157,0.00023374982,0.00018709386,0.00022414625,0.00043106792],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001008226,0.00030487723,0.00030274002,0.000086949294,0.009776953,0.00008432337,0.00028126797,0.00054370705,0.00011321963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000636785,0.000357495,0.0003027578,0.00041032495,0.002001405,0.0005868689,0.00010866239,0.0004635009,0.00012514184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011148955,0.0003412519,0.0361733,0.00007204439,0.00033365402,0.00079597044,0.20905681,0.002776423,0.0068516745,0.7354567,0.0014849172,0.006545784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012859064,0.00010707945,0.15311545,0.0001995728,0.00040628662,0.0007151843,0.12911984,0.0011547871,0.0026009264,0.0055288174,0.7050303,0.0007358227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60607165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08003448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7299279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034519553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024570462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586559163","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1137","title":"What is Left of Pelech?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Trilogy; Duty; Scholarship; Family law; Economic Justice; Politics; Duty to protect; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Law; Presumption; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.06554885058636634,"score_gpt":0.3457491903961765,"score_spread":0.2802003398098102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586559163","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014114142,0.8479214,0.0000071651316,0.04882448,0.00091114425,0.0014203711,0.000013593347,0.00014705116,0.08664068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21332829,0.77819836,0.00022018433,0.0037633735,0.00015653837,0.0000140174525,0.0000032954197,0.000010301148,0.0043056356],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983136,0.00019912049,0.00034762066,0.00021756004,0.0006039331,0.000318131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990969,0.00009660344,0.00014664416,0.00021808626,0.0003363895,0.000105427345],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005560114,0.00014169431,0.0004809543,0.000009406795,0.0006500629,0.00002885167,0.0003286266,0.000071986215,0.0016615578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019706742,0.000108505315,0.00022060571,0.00018151551,0.00071461307,0.0005420833,0.000073191375,0.000118933836,0.00026029957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016895745,0.00039028574,0.009559806,0.006898363,0.000491504,0.000046634923,0.11292515,0.000001024588,0.00040395,0.22909126,0.6118199,0.028355233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007919058,0.000016784561,0.00047663125,0.00155527,0.000049891376,0.0000025810552,0.00068401155,4.20804e-7,0.00012848587,0.00021237675,0.9966464,0.00014793228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003692284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017735482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38482654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009322194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007219388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589873774","doi":"10.17613/5c31h-0r405","title":"A Mulitfaceted Approach to Recognizing Canadian First Nations Governments: What Courts May Decide","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.03317547617391118,"score_gpt":0.28270208375447725,"score_spread":0.24952660758056608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589873774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10099646,0.0003183693,0.00025109787,0.031424727,0.0005059417,0.0010275288,0.00003017377,0.00017476425,0.8652709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736946,0.00014278946,0.0066244346,0.0008700795,0.00023761681,0.00009571553,0.000015722657,0.000011644371,0.018307362],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983319,0.00007369395,0.00019967848,0.0002925365,0.0005354617,0.0005667126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914694,0.0002051812,0.000048774076,0.00010881148,0.00015432511,0.00033594316],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003134173,0.00013841513,0.00015143707,0.00006735979,0.002652419,0.00043727417,0.00023368266,0.000097635835,0.0002766635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000497771,0.00011984463,0.000062547864,0.0004615607,0.00011290525,0.0006173507,0.000049361523,0.000087011496,0.00023385863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027053633,0.0006626732,0.080161124,0.00007422139,0.0003873525,0.000026799536,0.16917373,0.0019176614,0.00015678974,0.24766587,0.48067597,0.019070763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002363632,0.000010303179,0.03002818,0.000045976092,0.000019468398,5.0103074e-7,0.07993604,0.00007632855,0.0000427397,0.00019261493,0.88907504,0.00033643737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8874741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9878453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8726982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018892075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012900878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592248204","doi":"","title":"Annotation to Droit De La Famille – 102866","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Common law; Autonomy; Economic Justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.008214677962475795,"score_gpt":0.2960763415355794,"score_spread":0.2878616635731036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592248204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94318134,0.006696104,0.0012704694,0.027218852,0.0024573922,0.00023451987,0.0000051401357,0.000048974533,0.018887198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94343644,0.008182883,0.000696957,0.0003597638,0.0024188193,0.0000107251,0.0000012041687,0.000023333765,0.044869892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99527234,0.0004659937,0.00029597548,0.00024041686,0.0005103851,0.0032149171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989346,0.00024966462,0.00017066393,0.00010674282,0.00022324263,0.0003150351],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004050458,0.00020868024,0.00023144542,0.00005862577,0.0014686333,0.0002151162,0.0004265146,0.00029928616,0.0002581031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063084706,0.00019600628,0.00018232917,0.00045410995,0.0005072618,0.00038982448,0.00006214829,0.0036045352,0.00039147655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028558818,0.00012435921,0.0037807573,0.000008129803,0.00021008661,0.000009136595,0.026462184,0.000065553424,0.00303438,0.816815,0.002746458,0.1467154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007495587,0.00036594563,0.01897918,0.000049382183,0.00012778545,0.00025680673,0.05270827,0.000089627334,0.00012461083,0.4649159,0.4610531,0.0005798295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005763848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033715576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45830664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028782196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019930524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593698211","doi":"","title":"The Failure of the Daniels Case: Blindly Entrenching a Colonial Legacy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Jurisprudence; Law; Constitution; Indigenous; Political science; Colonialism; Interpretation (philosophy); Status quo; Plaintiff; Government (linguistics); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.009884495003646451,"score_gpt":0.2730486057882802,"score_spread":0.26316411078463375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593698211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95863956,0.0023520452,0.000033950255,0.036238823,0.00043807484,0.0003994691,0.0000010788601,0.000019212799,0.001877774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99466795,0.0011039356,0.000028444945,0.000061285755,0.00058244256,0.000013001127,1.3696781e-7,0.000007452796,0.0035353494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683964,0.0004481576,0.000285825,0.0001224245,0.0005232274,0.001780748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895644,0.00030813037,0.00028909248,0.00013412659,0.00023896749,0.00007322055],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019125772,0.00012427352,0.00015353074,0.000017157416,0.0041997186,0.00034550816,0.00060453085,0.00008418041,0.000070117916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059657,0.00006016337,0.00018550444,0.0002579654,0.0004731145,0.0004414623,0.00010087333,0.001493577,0.000023128263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039770097,0.00014958174,0.009432192,0.00001002321,0.00090812607,0.000028150369,0.11880388,0.000048647526,0.0015987372,0.7815821,0.008541603,0.078857146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018595473,0.00033233772,0.012269483,0.00008644531,0.00023943001,0.0016341677,0.54381305,0.00007225049,0.00031844093,0.22005098,0.21866101,0.0006628474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02225764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16823019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5615312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008868705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012808861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99709666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595154483","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1048","title":"Inclusive Equality and New Forms of Social Governance","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Dignity; Jurisprudence; Welfare state; Law and economics; Ideology; Liberalism; Neoliberalism (international relations); Social rights; Constitutional court; Supreme court; State (computer science); Law; Human rights; Sociology; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.05309269584456907,"score_gpt":0.3665112701150699,"score_spread":0.31341857427050085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595154483","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052954037,0.47212845,0.0001364494,0.21950218,0.00055301446,0.0033452867,0.000116253395,0.00021456258,0.2510498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8985347,0.09774191,0.00039707287,0.0022550963,0.00028648766,0.000017950377,0.0000042036763,0.000009763251,0.00075282226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986185,0.000108722445,0.00032151164,0.00019225638,0.0004914864,0.000267513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993404,0.00005747534,0.00023199592,0.00009976043,0.00016319545,0.00010715002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006583713,0.0001287182,0.00044378432,0.00000340476,0.0006678649,0.000022732158,0.00021604108,0.00007231686,0.00015507029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035173926,0.000096484146,0.00012783718,0.00016808725,0.0005401118,0.00027502686,0.00016279418,0.00010974902,0.000023323853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037717557,0.00002452068,0.0001409039,0.00067316386,0.000033782162,8.8227154e-7,0.009145094,2.488128e-7,0.000025018488,0.9813049,0.0027177376,0.005930017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036042152,0.000024152869,0.0032249952,0.0010070149,0.00007104704,4.9979957e-7,0.00060485007,8.908785e-8,0.000053191397,0.0150057245,0.979461,0.00018698962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02176715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015972696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9767433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000262606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001501757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.984747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596745203","doi":"","title":"Poverty: Rights, Social Citizenship, and Legal Activism (review)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Humanities; Social activism; Poverty; Sociology; Ethnology; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.03650307164823102,"score_gpt":0.27295225635577847,"score_spread":0.23644918470754744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596745203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8049453,0.021378035,0.000002751938,0.105808325,0.0004148304,0.0003242284,0.000023755114,0.0000129769605,0.067089796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827885,0.0064165406,0.000022194497,0.005351557,0.00056949904,0.0000072186094,7.713207e-7,0.00000916896,0.00483454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853104,0.0003278395,0.00027712993,0.00012925713,0.00021295849,0.000521757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987639,0.0002144798,0.00022136628,0.00006718493,0.0001358647,0.0005971821],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012102172,0.00014442453,0.00047675546,0.000042670155,0.0021173418,0.0001030683,0.0002323774,0.000081110804,0.00011912739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023251171,0.00009655559,0.00012035883,0.00013368989,0.0014542651,0.00025075438,0.000026250558,0.00035413788,0.0000048008546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006835639,0.000013694881,0.0010857023,0.000102555656,0.0003599206,0.00040931322,0.16781992,4.4208696e-7,0.000004772401,0.7762792,0.051847257,0.002008831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002417946,0.00010327483,0.012409603,0.0003382712,0.0001167949,0.00061074714,0.012801169,0.0000026434673,0.000005997455,0.07770735,0.89304596,0.000440267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030880166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07906755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8411987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047023315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003400897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99918175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597131993","doi":"","title":"Developments in Aboriginal Law: The 2006-2007 Term","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Supreme court; Law; Treaty; Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.01193500166887916,"score_gpt":0.32564049527708283,"score_spread":0.31370549360820366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597131993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8455646,0.0059503224,0.00030533815,0.0056098253,0.00110045,0.0004088896,0.0000015736664,0.000060614384,0.14099841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898919,0.0038264035,0.00010025061,0.0003487474,0.0007675195,0.0000044511216,6.8464954e-7,0.000009266578,0.0050507677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597627,0.00014805025,0.00030188792,0.00015004055,0.0005738007,0.0028499682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994687,0.00012601039,0.00012702096,0.00007057897,0.00010860857,0.00009912339],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058142575,0.00013495336,0.00014565639,0.000047265774,0.0015315391,0.00010256159,0.0004464079,0.00008907112,0.000039993254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009211366,0.000086532906,0.00007263824,0.0003075709,0.0003019288,0.00025901085,0.000028077611,0.0015379223,0.00007316649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004477876,0.00006768358,0.07703211,0.0000019457837,0.00010194222,0.000018321687,0.021235531,0.0000031836994,0.00005216622,0.8782218,0.0004026204,0.022817932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009835684,0.00008011203,0.17309698,0.00003761461,0.000026040603,0.000059964652,0.060727045,7.949485e-7,0.000055249675,0.04600343,0.71853447,0.00039470528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009687959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25306466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83221835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003137788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014713081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598691393","doi":"10.21991/c9p07t","title":"THE REGULATION OF PRIVATE HEALTH CARE UNDER THE CANADA HEALTH ACT AND THE CANADIAN CHARTER","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Health care; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Business; Health policy; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.030519110586481518,"score_gpt":0.27547434307326224,"score_spread":0.24495523248678072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598691393","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017350025,0.020373113,0.0015700854,0.85988355,0.004079401,0.004607621,0.0004999144,0.00010693107,0.09152934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939297,0.00041704864,0.000097431075,0.0051836385,0.00009892042,0.000066672044,0.00002533266,0.0000045366864,0.000176718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974941,0.0003823658,0.00047975685,0.00024952894,0.000611082,0.0007831782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839467,0.00035305248,0.00033313668,0.00026162964,0.00036739846,0.00029010506],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011160418,0.00019605234,0.00027276285,0.000036861962,0.015877642,0.000104455576,0.00041479184,0.000084076695,0.00004678103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030356093,0.00010052443,0.00010107538,0.00025267975,0.01578341,0.00023233055,0.00009831568,0.00025459603,0.0000061785554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027521153,0.000005811286,0.0068925507,0.0000088944635,0.00006488323,3.9876596e-7,0.0070100306,0.000034321798,4.800474e-7,0.9782497,0.0066363593,0.0010690038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001439238,0.000043483462,0.097654715,0.00011661403,0.000040385406,0.00002196796,0.102426834,0.00007034325,0.000012944881,0.01795687,0.7798841,0.00033251542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9751762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97657967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017313244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014330699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99125713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599589641","doi":"","title":"Particular Justice: Michel Bastarache and Family Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Duty; Family law; Law; Legislature; Sociology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.014755035102371921,"score_gpt":0.29807502051538093,"score_spread":0.283319985413009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599589641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9728744,0.0050836853,0.00013985035,0.011158476,0.00062334933,0.00016809556,0.0000015924004,0.000057022433,0.009893542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931383,0.003420257,0.00027253496,0.00051887706,0.0008709434,0.000005661497,6.40308e-7,0.0000116483025,0.0017610952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710435,0.00015061504,0.00019700534,0.00018459636,0.00039422273,0.0019692215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993732,0.000102776845,0.00010309801,0.00008902042,0.00014464662,0.00018728059],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021698468,0.00013923405,0.00016953683,0.00002156682,0.0019418594,0.00017127604,0.00022792991,0.00012879171,0.000041635816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003216282,0.00010801943,0.00008190578,0.00012277982,0.0005133903,0.00031275678,0.000049639828,0.002084395,0.000041276144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016332384,0.000046024576,0.0016187364,0.0000061074775,0.0001295623,0.0000053275185,0.00754961,0.0000020321659,0.0069699646,0.9760599,0.00054371444,0.007052691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017429636,0.00028260882,0.01398507,0.000028753993,0.000579918,0.00015099358,0.17631982,0.0000763597,0.00034761112,0.21781455,0.5877573,0.0009140657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003870397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041539133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75824535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033645966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057384936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599730556","doi":"","title":"Legal Processes and Gendered Violence: Cross-Applications for Domestic Violence Protection Orders","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Respondent; Order (exchange); Political science; Law; Legislation; Civil defense; Common law; Criminology; Business; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Sociology; Medicine; Environmental health","score_opus":0.016781039668692536,"score_gpt":0.3206330723930911,"score_spread":0.30385203272439854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599730556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9208371,0.009974963,0.057491384,0.0056124423,0.00024768713,0.0047477414,0.0000074687573,0.00019280924,0.00088842236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98734564,0.010324101,0.00031418263,0.0000509092,0.00042018606,0.00091095816,0.0000014450154,0.00001280137,0.0006198047],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759537,0.0000730566,0.00023834022,0.0002556808,0.00030006477,0.001537477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988791,0.00010750025,0.00018003224,0.000071607916,0.0006402929,0.00012147333],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008472432,0.00014840756,0.00015752322,0.000042499043,0.0024844883,0.0003816566,0.00023972805,0.000102405575,0.000024302386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059704174,0.000118569675,0.00005921272,0.0002860374,0.000412643,0.00069251616,0.000029317016,0.00064197334,0.000021207083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012787963,0.00028659336,0.010356021,0.0003262199,0.0004726548,0.0000011965594,0.009504695,0.000114745744,0.0019296758,0.42695186,0.00018602102,0.54974246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015363724,0.00049599673,0.008239228,0.00019637689,0.0001016391,0.00011571968,0.05131472,0.00016659252,0.00018808109,0.9150675,0.021869358,0.000708399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005009869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051628915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54903406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007711159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015652931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99881417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600158505","doi":"","title":"Law and religion: God, the state and the common law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Political science; Freedom of religion; Constitutional law; Common law; Politics; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Comparative law; State (computer science); Covenant; Free Exercise Clause; Religious law; Religious studies; Sociology; Philosophy; Human rights; Theology; Islam; Fundamental rights; Supreme court; First amendment; Right to property","score_opus":0.02092686578855391,"score_gpt":0.289701995672569,"score_spread":0.2687751298840151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600158505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019275211,0.00865085,4.36448e-7,0.038605843,0.00013214766,0.0006211687,0.000011244182,0.00004915323,0.9517364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0144217,0.015310952,0.000034799083,0.008254169,0.0006228235,0.000027486662,0.0000037147988,0.000013562648,0.9613108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864125,0.00025102013,0.00020482078,0.0002329429,0.00040238732,0.00026759115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873364,0.00082738604,0.00012288454,0.0001716709,0.00007186655,0.00007257173],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075295026,0.00021021145,0.00033197095,0.0000055159317,0.0026408262,0.00029135967,0.0002817671,0.00016529327,0.0001149326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028841328,0.00008802753,0.00008057381,0.00003563829,0.0055292356,0.000113049326,0.00024392526,0.00036773217,0.00005487391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012057244,0.0000028089376,0.0000068116556,0.000007305339,0.000052667223,0.0000016404609,0.018445222,3.2084407e-7,8.0216424e-8,0.8869032,0.09342343,0.0011443982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029262764,0.000009803828,0.00003373147,0.000024867137,0.000051207127,0.0000014370731,0.0017178066,0.0000022392956,6.055272e-7,0.06131739,0.93639916,0.00014912344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07192841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2789493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84297574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012739356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038997383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601054333","doi":"","title":"Taking Notice of Equality: Judicial Notice and Expert Evidence in Trials Involving Equality Seeking Groups","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Doctrine; Scope (computer science); Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.14973435719339037,"score_gpt":0.41184897818333166,"score_spread":0.2621146209899413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1601054333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9560963,0.032028064,0.0016723649,0.008193346,0.00038013005,0.00042631707,0.0000012478721,0.000044113724,0.0011581014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836011,0.014745072,0.00026908537,0.00034788554,0.0009671311,0.0000041109347,3.69669e-7,0.000009322748,0.000055920675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930501,0.0025796324,0.0010914529,0.00032281474,0.00090691313,0.002049116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99643505,0.0020152654,0.0010548816,0.000120925215,0.00024560752,0.00012828935],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028898789,0.00021655114,0.000753359,0.000109197084,0.0009875323,0.00016076074,0.00039612333,0.00018063551,0.000028858523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014819209,0.00018335122,0.00017598401,0.00048185416,0.00027920224,0.00096615957,0.00008210792,0.0014648607,0.000002170206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000488894,0.0002773387,0.029035687,0.000059726193,0.00030656712,0.000013222141,0.21605894,0.00007031429,0.017724555,0.6218676,0.0000394569,0.114057705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004546162,0.0012840882,0.13341968,0.0025956156,0.00041932042,0.00005821747,0.48133063,0.00049797044,0.000776347,0.37185335,0.0014055708,0.0018130594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019431604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038557988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26527166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019073676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009897894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603948267","doi":"","title":"Sexual Assault in Spousal Relationships, 'Continuous Consent', and the Law, Honest but Mistaken Judicial Beliefs","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Criminal law; Test (biology); Criminal code; Law; Sodomy; Social psychology; Reasonable person; Criminology; Political science; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Homosexuality; Medicine","score_opus":0.022312662104427228,"score_gpt":0.2857052451295585,"score_spread":0.2633925830251313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603948267","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9667491,0.0017143114,0.00002574733,0.022228077,0.0004754145,0.00032709,0.0000036806155,0.00003936501,0.008437228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99409497,0.0011250569,0.000055534754,0.00018482101,0.0011504698,0.000011595691,0.0000018386752,0.000012962975,0.003362735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966271,0.00065266923,0.00034703908,0.00021317758,0.00052644353,0.0016335737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867773,0.00074369385,0.00019788754,0.000103561055,0.00016045831,0.00011665445],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005948761,0.00016490638,0.00027142523,0.00004140221,0.00247302,0.00020204726,0.00030316834,0.00021736578,0.000027178015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016680526,0.000112220296,0.00006928903,0.00019633568,0.0014834063,0.00024320056,0.00005037537,0.004279082,0.000022164813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118330616,0.00006002363,0.043120228,0.0000027879712,0.00010050241,0.000010362507,0.026250018,0.0000024947487,0.0003110874,0.9270574,0.00035161732,0.0026151359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009840021,0.0003046074,0.13014702,0.000051736755,0.00021193406,0.00047559568,0.41220257,0.000046627865,0.000030582916,0.3712882,0.07436723,0.001033855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043021604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6542161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61119455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047105344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001267447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605347426","doi":"","title":"'Introduction' in Elizabeth Sheehy, Ed, Adding Feminism to Law: The Contributions of Justice Claire L’Heureux-Dubé","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Theme (computing); Law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Democracy; Feminism; Grassroots; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.011098145159308983,"score_gpt":0.3059937623750687,"score_spread":0.29489561721575974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605347426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4893231,0.017710535,0.0047819046,0.4543423,0.003406753,0.0019967644,0.00005155773,0.00018768969,0.02819938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930505,0.003953376,0.00014163149,0.00031141719,0.0016785115,0.00001706452,0.0000021272488,0.000011028164,0.0008343336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99673253,0.00026110874,0.000391616,0.00021593868,0.00053181197,0.0018669774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990488,0.00016810774,0.00018810472,0.00013739816,0.0003371983,0.00012034009],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029195354,0.00015204532,0.00025461437,0.000056067915,0.0019837995,0.000088251785,0.00044743708,0.000110119065,0.000047733236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010621794,0.00010718651,0.00013124838,0.0005146272,0.0003688955,0.00027749987,0.00006525712,0.0015179093,0.000041517615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028655782,0.00006557602,0.00010314782,0.0000042908505,0.00008607013,0.0000017852994,0.0133402515,0.00082066696,0.00076963817,0.98228997,0.0013912398,0.0010987348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033838828,0.00063970056,0.0028982847,0.00018856603,0.0004526809,0.00013448959,0.34084207,0.000014490681,0.0012295533,0.28646812,0.36294726,0.00080091547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067083593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039917074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6958218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032700668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013554548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605688381","doi":"","title":"FAMILY OUTSIDE THE BOOK ON THE FAMILY","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Family law; Law; Civil code; Code (set theory); Political science; Creativity; Civil law (Civil law); Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; Public law; Programming language","score_opus":0.022517523879209835,"score_gpt":0.29180815252956827,"score_spread":0.2692906286503584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605688381","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35647953,0.03704179,0.00018079962,0.39898166,0.0007972732,0.0007880989,0.0000023304685,0.00014699125,0.20558153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.962109,0.01615855,0.00000780768,0.009351541,0.0012992929,0.000007231951,2.719073e-7,0.0000086868495,0.0110576125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627614,0.00045184378,0.00022404693,0.00016459008,0.00072849996,0.0021548963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991902,0.00030344626,0.00014775658,0.00016441835,0.00011599303,0.0000781453],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003075531,0.00016669919,0.0001585061,0.000022223023,0.0035746312,0.00020576574,0.0007464125,0.00007792169,0.000038014347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034259455,0.000076125274,0.00019266206,0.00020962165,0.00030598367,0.0001935741,0.000029240895,0.0020448405,0.00016870233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034868724,0.000043703818,0.00019740923,4.6105566e-7,0.00014558398,0.000003349483,0.012471007,0.000021749023,0.00038974496,0.91415554,0.02916979,0.0433668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037443647,0.00038389437,0.021171391,0.000023870381,0.000053705437,0.000013743375,0.11324033,0.000009065896,0.000028439412,0.2137777,0.65063906,0.0002843599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015533195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026557134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7003778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013178716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009002043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99772257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606274289","doi":"10.29173/mlj776","title":"Ivan Rand's Ancient Constitutionalism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reactionary; Constitutionalism; Economic Justice; Nationalism; Law; Political science; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.029376311100441938,"score_gpt":0.30086656386384164,"score_spread":0.2714902527633997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606274289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8252306,0.00022562873,0.00005880167,0.007327158,0.0047063655,0.000186952,0.0000063073644,0.000073157345,0.16218504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99576384,0.00006313101,0.0007609562,0.0007190089,0.0025088363,0.0000048685342,0.0000011184125,0.0000051383454,0.00017308397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855596,0.000115234136,0.00020787423,0.00013032448,0.00060367864,0.00038692693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991784,0.00009475014,0.00011032964,0.00007966107,0.00028849515,0.0002483274],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085526996,0.00010802934,0.00014505934,0.000021855196,0.0043634917,0.0003305966,0.00028202214,0.00009562986,0.00074038794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030147776,0.00008071251,0.00011678752,0.00010036374,0.0011753915,0.00031879265,0.000051472503,0.00056546874,0.00019231606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017084307,0.00007924821,0.0059995553,0.0000035864882,0.000059688868,0.000064874264,0.007570545,0.000007228499,0.0017301948,0.9642352,0.012857253,0.007375535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000489487,0.000013175243,0.010269619,0.000011025786,0.000018915454,0.00005939595,0.020756772,0.0000025520228,0.00010436025,0.003914743,0.96420026,0.00015967315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030249534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43430257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9603205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016031432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000089773755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607856959","doi":"10.7202/1007865ar","title":"La souffrance : injonction religieuse versus expression politique","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Anthropologie et Sociétés","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.24344773640232595,"score_gpt":0.5717899886131406,"score_spread":0.3283422522108146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607856959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33896363,0.058074743,0.0003340819,0.25135478,0.111315414,0.0009092891,0.000077889395,0.0007845782,0.23818558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9014008,0.08882197,0.0008381218,0.0005512821,0.0021021713,0.00006756842,0.000012083604,0.00003841788,0.006167602],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99502736,0.0020690747,0.00042987018,0.00046686083,0.00058776146,0.0014190634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971684,0.0017744877,0.00021759699,0.0003225057,0.0001821673,0.00033482086],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014322218,0.00043412505,0.0004959926,0.000039010556,0.0018276004,0.00009690434,0.00041579705,0.000969363,0.0067739817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018458047,0.00038220518,0.00031624822,0.0004098201,0.005026493,0.0015036155,0.0003792783,0.00091460015,0.0006420274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038132828,0.0016772958,0.02231625,0.0002408381,0.0004482352,0.00003558446,0.19442542,0.000022214084,0.0013048485,0.17737536,0.5221002,0.079672396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001119703,0.000187258,0.012237011,0.00014686378,0.000120454824,0.0000026563337,0.23813541,0.0000053341546,0.0021133341,0.0015988207,0.74368685,0.00064627756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018821584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005686588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5624372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009668067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015374561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608073562","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1245","title":"Looking Backward, Looking Forward: The Supreme Court of Canada’s Decision in R. v. Ipeelee","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Proportionality (law); Prison; High Court; Charter; Legislation; Parliament; Economic Justice; Representation (politics); Politics","score_opus":0.03336093205677299,"score_gpt":0.3157383767015545,"score_spread":0.28237744464478154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608073562","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.089033656,0.70212257,0.00016528393,0.055492003,0.0036325322,0.0056722234,0.00007662365,0.0001728223,0.1436323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9608007,0.036050294,0.00036253835,0.001851666,0.00038321177,0.000054987613,0.0000055835385,0.000025138497,0.0004658703],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99590105,0.0005516119,0.00080989226,0.0003072482,0.0014344788,0.0009956951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978995,0.0007621654,0.00033442455,0.00041905988,0.00035446347,0.00023041974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004145285,0.00029082497,0.0007749658,0.000026070767,0.0009256194,0.000049789276,0.0007683394,0.000102099795,0.00051789754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014061214,0.00019267383,0.0002342876,0.00043014644,0.00043570058,0.0004798083,0.00023481717,0.00035293732,0.000033204582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009641411,0.0005568865,0.12925437,0.0058498704,0.00071401824,0.000048803984,0.04840469,0.00009235827,0.00024078277,0.28397688,0.44625476,0.08451018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023287421,0.000012911223,0.0068590236,0.003094921,0.000108783366,0.0000026253674,0.00194489,0.0000072848375,0.000057920774,0.00033589252,0.98704314,0.00029973037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5420929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86861295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87176704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008094338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047916113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7857011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1609483509","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1187","title":"Section 1, Constitutional Reasoning and Cultural Difference: Assessing the Impacts of Alberta v. Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Charter; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Constitutionalism; Irony; Political science; Constitutional law; Section (typography); Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Democracy","score_opus":0.031262043503530616,"score_gpt":0.3525673312348134,"score_spread":0.32130528773128275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1609483509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9529974,0.017390102,0.000011937651,0.008422392,0.000643861,0.0007440111,0.0000135330565,0.000024587522,0.019752167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916168,0.0075625265,0.00023244182,0.000220015,0.00018453918,0.000014918016,0.0000069258385,0.0000036674526,0.000158197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987151,0.00024527084,0.00031084332,0.00016274283,0.00035639788,0.00020966295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989105,0.0002924849,0.00028379407,0.00012469977,0.0003128168,0.00007570058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082088995,0.00012730439,0.00036035985,0.0000081150365,0.00074872706,0.000069753616,0.00017659574,0.00009355417,0.000115315575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009921759,0.00007482456,0.00009053828,0.00015111027,0.002461728,0.0003086405,0.00006757021,0.0002302103,0.0000017728877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001935112,0.000120736455,0.09365119,0.002681504,0.00027545102,0.0000019469421,0.02462651,0.000001023603,0.04287614,0.822558,0.005743362,0.0074448152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083249994,0.00011936856,0.24040812,0.010609177,0.00062342687,0.00003665825,0.004759276,0.000039724193,0.0013464326,0.0011203086,0.7393891,0.0007158688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02305612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02630671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82143766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004936624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000104474544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1618705117","doi":"","title":"FEDERAL POWER AND FEDERAL DUTY: RECONCILING SECTIONS 91(24) AND 35(1) OF THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Parliament; Treaty; Law; Political science; Legislature; Power (physics); Duty; Treaty of Waitangi; Politics","score_opus":0.036240484362927025,"score_gpt":0.26672059517143726,"score_spread":0.23048011080851022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1618705117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8534067,0.00056092395,0.0000021092253,0.0019404684,0.0006902027,0.000287503,0.000017753657,0.00003534275,0.143059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99757993,0.000075691714,0.00022496523,0.00043238729,0.00010291864,0.000011585623,9.643913e-7,0.0000045419783,0.0015670221],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989878,0.00013621926,0.00017161212,0.00019955674,0.00019722061,0.00030756858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994025,0.0000494673,0.00007604772,0.00010090154,0.000121717545,0.00024934224],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032270892,0.00011095021,0.0001572454,0.000016720835,0.003768091,0.00015467207,0.000115471565,0.0001227148,0.00018996517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027269815,0.000082341234,0.000052516578,0.00011826605,0.0011916428,0.00029599053,0.000059028076,0.0002186347,0.000011058006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002172355,0.00004777461,0.550482,0.000030261026,0.00016436918,0.000008590907,0.052681662,0.000005889304,0.00042604542,0.39161146,0.003651726,0.00086850015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013137211,0.00012982797,0.64188564,0.00020157598,0.000089078734,0.000023657954,0.036879737,0.000022331158,0.0012273983,0.0068279603,0.3105704,0.00082869217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84227157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9764969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38478348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025747993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002589883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99752885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1628859977","doi":"","title":"Labour Rights as Human Rights: Turning Slogans into Legal Claims","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Fundamental rights; Law; Humanities; Charter; International human rights law; Politics; Context (archaeology); Social rights; Sociology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.014060566970134959,"score_gpt":0.2939328939781385,"score_spread":0.2798723270080035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1628859977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76252663,0.00017444158,0.000026441452,0.002706666,0.0008013551,0.00033837036,0.0000051900024,0.00040084764,0.23302007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9687492,0.000009938168,0.00084855425,0.00087551144,0.0020255786,0.00004549037,0.000012456145,0.000022803388,0.02741044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99666816,0.00058208435,0.00042935173,0.0005918751,0.0008696468,0.00085885415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984458,0.00023407413,0.00019466889,0.00035496303,0.00026813714,0.00050235935],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091453455,0.00034482864,0.00045577684,0.000048856575,0.007029854,0.00051560125,0.0007272048,0.00030049286,0.0016791597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028454332,0.00026486177,0.00020678282,0.0003317682,0.00086811074,0.000913185,0.00018007183,0.0006367507,0.0023276608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009620693,0.00005398432,0.0016353386,0.000014760699,0.00006805607,0.000015140813,0.009238049,0.000007974329,0.0007458842,0.9834612,0.0046033473,0.0001466181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051507476,0.00007922143,0.0033075928,0.000052186784,0.000033211407,0.0000015101967,0.0013100826,0.0000052374503,0.00080669636,0.07111856,0.92232776,0.00044284208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3499241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3652147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91772443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044536556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048785983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1637994529","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1293508","title":"Breaking the Law's Grip on Equality: A New Paradigm for Section 15","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04042182875429428,"score_gpt":0.3310574466077369,"score_spread":0.2906356178534426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1637994529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41324866,0.022760378,0.04631312,0.25359523,0.00977127,0.0046571856,0.000013515349,0.00059078494,0.24904987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98933446,0.0011373283,0.000066622575,0.0006704251,0.0017763961,0.000016779251,6.36766e-7,0.000013187511,0.0069841533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702585,0.00040709696,0.00021082639,0.00017023779,0.0004083791,0.0017776166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992917,0.00027943915,0.00016894899,0.00009026741,0.00007252949,0.00009712423],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003440586,0.0001323975,0.00015434215,0.00002081446,0.002923603,0.00018531889,0.00023153366,0.00009232241,0.00003862747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043005342,0.00008411152,0.00017648068,0.00017893198,0.00013859276,0.00020917314,0.000011440443,0.0010077864,0.000016417878],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002500109,0.000021282192,0.00011297676,0.0000015842677,0.000100334495,2.4406233e-7,0.0068471334,0.000027635344,0.000021247684,0.9863926,0.0011287726,0.0053211423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005386076,0.00016540418,0.00021048267,0.000014993946,0.000045476358,0.000024401092,0.021084152,0.000005383741,0.000038872717,0.429205,0.548505,0.00016222474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007049268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07981466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5760858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017326048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010597555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1641423233","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1266","title":"The Re-emergence of a Clash of Rights: A Critical Analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada’s Decision in R. v. S. (N.)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Witness; Economic Justice; Supreme Court Decisions; Sociology","score_opus":0.03238244692011854,"score_gpt":0.3345856106037711,"score_spread":0.3022031636836526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1641423233","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3944553,0.4206575,0.0000957473,0.10489635,0.0016707745,0.007717597,0.00040009152,0.000047046444,0.07005959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96958274,0.029886646,0.00019914568,0.00015590127,0.000019209745,0.000035505826,0.0000013984761,0.00000556281,0.000113911876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99624735,0.0006321005,0.0012036175,0.0002288185,0.0013235518,0.00036455263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963868,0.0013861731,0.00047236195,0.0005129295,0.0011512301,0.00009047032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018259921,0.00016323196,0.00096977537,0.000031864274,0.00037659533,0.000010712157,0.00090667204,0.000080800426,0.000697577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024639391,0.00008405498,0.00040743558,0.0012108532,0.0014212244,0.00014869981,0.00018468391,0.00016142125,0.0000020334392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100536454,0.0008913765,0.06089949,0.006189151,0.0034001237,0.0000053375975,0.020897562,0.00016721811,0.0016150009,0.6249683,0.26842308,0.0124427965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076940586,0.00017054997,0.1429844,0.014282484,0.004370358,8.0809514e-7,0.010196572,0.00075809733,0.0015612604,0.013617057,0.8103772,0.0009118208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80665904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95574766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61135125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001372558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000392765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76379794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1648716606","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1098","title":"The Federal Principle and the 2005 Balance of Powers in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); Political science; Psychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.015620089035533857,"score_gpt":0.28521681583314906,"score_spread":0.2695967267976152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1648716606","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059163626,0.7125766,0.0000013972157,0.13388771,0.0004160587,0.0021571051,0.00001811979,0.000023147964,0.0917562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9006218,0.097224385,0.00002302689,0.0009988119,0.00006729665,0.000036613965,0.000001150264,0.000004046924,0.0010229066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987045,0.00028967104,0.00027006576,0.000110971145,0.0003500222,0.00027477916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934894,0.00031445918,0.00011041567,0.000120480596,0.00007220556,0.00003349128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011121802,0.000083761064,0.0002629534,0.0000021285095,0.0006650463,0.00003190244,0.0002324114,0.000019196274,0.000037968017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021865353,0.000040464445,0.000048335132,0.00010484634,0.0006202898,0.00006342242,0.00005593691,0.00009746977,0.000002281562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026345058,0.000026373402,0.049326368,0.00063301285,0.00006157126,0.00000551368,0.0018103531,0.0000131351835,0.000008165117,0.86542803,0.079771236,0.002889869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020774723,0.000002019893,0.0110344635,0.000308081,0.000012067163,3.0946543e-7,0.00044073845,0.000007291925,0.0000025048384,0.00036668047,0.9875512,0.000066858825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9752482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99727243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002736835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024953118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51150656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1662027952","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1070","title":"What is Equality?: The Winding Course of Judicial Interpretation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Jurisprudence; Section (typography); Law; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Plaintiff; Element (criminal law); Charter; Political science; Judicial interpretation; Government (linguistics); Constitutional law; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.060244816806279536,"score_gpt":0.3895969499465125,"score_spread":0.329352133140233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1662027952","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021289235,0.6492308,0.0001020871,0.2844291,0.0017464133,0.0025784166,0.000028803928,0.0001464395,0.040448707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8525555,0.13992141,0.00009009944,0.006647437,0.0004205014,0.00002962022,0.000003863164,0.000006855931,0.00032468964],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811906,0.0004487902,0.00043149915,0.00018801456,0.0005387608,0.0002738538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898297,0.00023415452,0.0002480246,0.00019823192,0.00027261573,0.00006399586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018132958,0.00013599709,0.0003750179,0.000007668328,0.0006444417,0.00009433856,0.00037044543,0.00006219943,0.0005321257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002238343,0.000085131156,0.00020506157,0.00021467637,0.0005877908,0.0007635531,0.0000777606,0.00014589402,0.00010092483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025708761,0.00021636343,0.0011641135,0.0018257888,0.00043121827,0.0000014206358,0.20752017,0.000010415884,0.00015378393,0.35877788,0.06038164,0.36949152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091683534,0.00001536772,0.000269075,0.0027195676,0.0001429375,3.8060006e-7,0.004920061,0.000020758729,0.00009116318,0.0005120937,0.9910744,0.00014253399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021644568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005403787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93069273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001455653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059179674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5826403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W166696703","doi":"","title":"Divorcing Children: Children’s Experience of Their Parent’s Divorce","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed Central","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Meaning (existential); Perspective (graphical); Strict constructionism; Principal (computer security); Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01816153057686294,"score_gpt":0.24821450475698578,"score_spread":0.23005297418012283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W166696703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921899,0.00093948684,0.000031764175,0.0006743005,0.00057468074,0.0006394067,0.00003211865,0.00012643999,0.004791916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99795544,0.0001571656,0.000083851824,0.000061549355,0.001026579,0.00011420391,0.00001882201,0.000012674758,0.00056968833],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970279,0.00013947711,0.00033153445,0.0003303113,0.0005361668,0.0016346241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992583,0.000071553375,0.00017570426,0.00017106421,0.000061367886,0.00026205907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033852056,0.00020404434,0.0002781589,0.000030879557,0.0007616283,0.00010186115,0.00043906862,0.00009760873,0.00009758323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019081817,0.00016050601,0.0001642558,0.00026353318,0.00068251026,0.00037741894,0.00011795339,0.00014700042,0.000006651119],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068100044,0.000082175306,0.9657043,0.0000033522842,0.000034556353,5.920126e-7,0.026806522,0.000040086812,0.000044860688,0.0034142772,0.00069611165,0.0031663452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002639506,0.0000070394976,0.99260265,0.000011829587,0.000015924348,8.704999e-7,0.0038495325,0.0000038512853,0.0010462425,0.00015489107,0.0018311215,0.00021210768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039852776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005144933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034707844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003508301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051126946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96654093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1681414090","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.23848","title":"LESSONS TO BE LEARNED: THE DECISION OF THE SOCIAL BENEFITS TRIBUNAL IN TRANCHEMONTAGNE V. ONTARIO (DIRECTOR, DISABILITY SUPPORT PROGRAM)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Program director; Psychology; Political science; Management; Medical education; Medicine; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.07690490613691789,"score_gpt":0.4254042561545593,"score_spread":0.34849935001764143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1681414090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8286972,0.000026472646,0.000002729763,0.16739659,0.000622956,0.0011785385,0.000110798275,0.00005184057,0.0019128829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988797,0.0000046039727,0.00021238627,0.00022711002,0.00027932366,0.00023658575,0.000005529691,0.0000129334,0.00014183788],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964364,0.00047596375,0.0006047991,0.00059450464,0.0010928796,0.0007954295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968859,0.0020748952,0.00006709813,0.0005016526,0.00022087307,0.00024956418],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016897041,0.00027046909,0.00050275703,0.000010551667,0.0016083791,0.00015467884,0.00092692213,0.00023918993,0.0009100219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008580242,0.0001536239,0.00043095407,0.0004989638,0.010566519,0.00028339386,0.00030054647,0.00084443437,0.000008866938],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019865051,0.0041417014,0.7125259,0.00005997762,0.000031209034,0.0000012450323,0.09701781,0.000007722261,0.00032428117,0.081623875,0.0009995694,0.103068076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029001661,0.00007400212,0.9563853,0.000026382382,0.000058333575,5.25512e-7,0.02611834,0.0000029213845,0.00018717092,0.005185548,0.0114431465,0.00022827726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09069031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9093647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8186744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060478545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027683403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1690183032","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1283","title":"2013: Constitutional Cases in Review","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Constitution; Economic Justice; High Court; Government (linguistics); Constitutional right","score_opus":0.06678473625502294,"score_gpt":0.36131496886841874,"score_spread":0.2945302326133958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1690183032","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013756363,0.8259926,0.000016293414,0.05492818,0.0003148069,0.0011769176,0.000011771886,0.000076921,0.11734497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.076584384,0.9074537,0.00023270486,0.01467851,0.00025243757,0.000121668796,0.000015281405,0.000006480758,0.00065481523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780834,0.00060466415,0.00044094317,0.00026943884,0.0005075678,0.0003690553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899936,0.00032483903,0.00012573205,0.00019923343,0.00022179082,0.0001290299],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019881711,0.0001678578,0.0005816149,0.000012085197,0.00049401354,0.00002887362,0.00028941245,0.00006118883,0.0014356208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001959715,0.00012773152,0.0001629703,0.00027798372,0.0011952335,0.00023913996,0.000068649526,0.0001690397,0.00064257917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012496685,0.00004197042,0.000775597,0.0046740114,0.000019819145,0.0000108655095,0.0001879769,5.4682164e-7,0.0000022238528,0.81882125,0.1701585,0.005305994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009565638,0.000010880026,0.00022664541,0.016200958,0.000058991845,0.0000049885616,0.000030636882,8.903171e-7,9.243049e-7,0.00037586252,0.9828143,0.00017926322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077197817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012446769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8184454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017959741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009998858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1694764544","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1153","title":"Due Process, Collective Bargaining and Section 2(d) of the Charter: A Comment on B.C. Health Services","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Collective bargaining; Supreme court; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Freedom of association; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Human rights; History","score_opus":0.04399825640918045,"score_gpt":0.33035989872541344,"score_spread":0.28636164231623296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1694764544","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17241803,0.3200831,0.0000103333,0.36321178,0.0013193941,0.011408714,0.00008307601,0.0003136054,0.13115197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91811275,0.06733231,0.00002604234,0.014140572,0.000117397074,0.00007876431,0.0000021291698,0.0000074933673,0.00018253415],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985725,0.0003700038,0.00025209322,0.00018462141,0.00040389577,0.00021685539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932194,0.00008939758,0.00021969368,0.0001165095,0.00018318473,0.000069301575],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000579169,0.00011830287,0.00036281033,0.000008380642,0.0016981489,0.000014516393,0.00016141095,0.000039090104,0.000033052103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056990804,0.0000738802,0.000073706084,0.00026966524,0.00032121013,0.000118795295,0.000048907063,0.00012937516,0.0000040626214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011226026,0.00087876595,0.022916786,0.023835605,0.0007167527,0.000018137967,0.7104195,0.000019292624,0.00007276015,0.12820916,0.09920864,0.013592359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045027878,0.0002129888,0.011302626,0.00945638,0.000064848784,0.000013037723,0.0067586857,0.000013505413,0.000055012188,0.00067536515,0.97074085,0.00025642748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073592784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005646637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8715322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021355531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012837682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1698388006","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1961111","title":"End-of-Life Decision-Making in Canada: The Report by the Royal Society of Canada Expert Panel on End-of-Life Decision-Making","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; End-of-life care; Assisted suicide; Palliative care; Place of death; Making-of; Law; Political science; Medicine; Nursing; Management","score_opus":0.03388545239729944,"score_gpt":0.2960244792366749,"score_spread":0.26213902683937546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1698388006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827158,0.009248537,0.0007110431,0.0026284673,0.0007736805,0.00037131293,0.000017080585,0.000009487066,0.0035246233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975313,0.0014493467,0.00025644293,0.00040880629,0.00020087755,0.00000963586,5.713652e-7,0.00001826325,0.00012475764],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99455625,0.00034577894,0.0011060062,0.00028576725,0.0019258332,0.0017803769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955698,0.0026013867,0.0010716462,0.00030104467,0.0003176401,0.00013848004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004041063,0.00024975569,0.0005222276,0.000031694723,0.0011848611,0.000027375261,0.0010482041,0.00010918085,0.00020242146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033182963,0.00014242431,0.0002507607,0.00039562272,0.0004218611,0.00011547123,0.00014215283,0.0013829508,4.679982e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013457041,0.0005531106,0.223154,0.000051919687,0.0029538856,0.00014193273,0.18719839,0.0029875692,0.00017392218,0.044128716,0.119057976,0.4182529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00211077,0.00040569287,0.11605986,0.0014879039,0.00017131428,0.00013348839,0.78660834,0.0009194763,0.00031522993,0.040481653,0.049913157,0.0013931117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99342966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99926275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59940994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005492211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0384354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1704118755","doi":"","title":"Equality Rights And Social Benefit Programs","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Statute; Petitioner; Law; Statutory law; Political science; Premise; Discretion; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0884142195885654,"score_gpt":0.350251721995125,"score_spread":0.2618375024065596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1704118755","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.096609466,0.15776516,0.0007564085,0.26216662,0.0016356483,0.009591431,0.0024008644,0.0012229944,0.46785143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909446,0.0041671987,0.0002241948,0.0024426233,0.0007084429,0.00013219002,0.000063397725,0.0000067639667,0.0013105482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690664,0.0004816088,0.00054574205,0.00047524765,0.0009714028,0.0006193746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791735,0.0003719823,0.00023802485,0.00022308373,0.0010579963,0.00019153437],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014064304,0.00033899368,0.0005438396,0.000016674761,0.0042005675,0.00020832695,0.00052383746,0.00014455579,0.00051507034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002654439,0.00022340757,0.0002046446,0.00019547825,0.009784047,0.00071888184,0.00023644774,0.00035995443,0.00013699457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017282764,0.000073187766,0.00014104547,0.0001169794,0.000059976384,0.000007093618,0.0031749208,0.0000016564727,0.0000052993178,0.9889613,0.0036312537,0.0038099992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026586792,0.000046187986,0.00038493038,0.00041919792,0.00015727256,0.000032547545,0.0014639519,0.0000119887245,0.000009554708,0.007825665,0.9889794,0.00040346387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019481763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041374933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9853481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022591933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030393564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W171361639","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1474","title":"Latimer: Something Ominous is Happening in the World of Disabled People","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Supreme court; Punishment (psychology); Setback; Sentence; Law; Homicide; Legislation; Criminology; Happening; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Social psychology; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.04100457576549173,"score_gpt":0.3296731943426741,"score_spread":0.2886686185771824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W171361639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14846103,0.00077715534,0.000050418497,0.016301293,0.00027644561,0.00024395362,0.000002509647,0.000025776702,0.8338614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961885,0.00034395113,0.0011458653,0.0004479112,0.000332232,0.000005519869,5.609673e-7,0.000009080066,0.0015263715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978929,0.00042237993,0.00038547872,0.00014461983,0.0006880802,0.0004665513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989477,0.00048416958,0.00025054978,0.000113437745,0.0001118488,0.00009229263],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001813549,0.0001304141,0.0002870181,0.000051717536,0.001802506,0.00020497394,0.00048439417,0.00006851108,0.0006624578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021683761,0.00008507315,0.00014617274,0.0005294804,0.0002581993,0.00042949885,0.000063510604,0.00051883096,0.000027103444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006398208,0.0002467717,0.1426197,0.000022277245,0.00014660304,0.000077944045,0.36928087,0.0002328448,0.00034988395,0.47602144,0.003451185,0.007486521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055406266,0.00029900103,0.18076243,0.0010030117,0.00038886548,0.0002471453,0.2993877,0.0007607154,0.0007840428,0.23467544,0.27427408,0.00187697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18607989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7567778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8477275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015244653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039562798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1716680343","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1026","title":"The Court's Exercise of Plenary Power: Rewriting the Two-Row Wampum","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Doctrine; Political science; High Court; Sovereignty; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04757977348942157,"score_gpt":0.32391248267403233,"score_spread":0.2763327091846108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1716680343","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019558347,0.72554266,0.0000034730622,0.11728215,0.00054677157,0.0020845141,0.000017680683,0.00012987155,0.15243706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4987948,0.4961781,0.000139136,0.0018211895,0.00028999682,0.00012733006,0.0000023447237,0.000021559355,0.0026255583],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971883,0.0005882373,0.0005294962,0.00027162614,0.00085905445,0.00056325016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979914,0.00073680445,0.00031808318,0.00046791448,0.00037625447,0.00010956004],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025167626,0.00021665488,0.00050837756,0.0000075549165,0.0026555208,0.00010396036,0.00089020916,0.00006808247,0.0007961627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000800717,0.00011109578,0.00031374616,0.000336562,0.0012662323,0.00023193464,0.00019341058,0.00029422547,0.00018343035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018799183,0.00020153401,0.0011086569,0.0017889857,0.00029194594,0.000019295976,0.024823755,0.0000054301754,0.00008072041,0.32464772,0.53901875,0.10799438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013612812,0.000019233372,0.00013810066,0.002219873,0.0001221226,0.0000017749277,0.0027704576,0.000018107112,0.000014424226,0.0003848923,0.9939954,0.00017942888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025802946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022793778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49683896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011193108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030639218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99864286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1720261768","doi":"","title":"Graham Swift and the Ethical Self","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in literature and language","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Swift; Modernity; Postmodernism; Obligation; Utopia; Meaning (existential); Aesthetics; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02986949201529906,"score_gpt":0.34630621510102355,"score_spread":0.3164367230857245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1720261768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6749656,0.23038177,8.3658244e-7,0.009476447,0.00048269576,0.0005123783,0.0000080294,0.00010287512,0.084069364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879268,0.00925736,0.00032147142,0.0013037197,0.00024111687,0.000029326788,7.3208906e-7,0.000003936256,0.00091552705],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908566,0.0002762322,0.000115349634,0.00016798315,0.00014525389,0.00020950461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947447,0.00032356253,0.000031483836,0.00007472789,0.000056884113,0.000038902323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073764933,0.00010609546,0.00020503771,0.000018983223,0.00059155887,0.000057068726,0.00009168163,0.00013906244,0.000013200877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005343476,0.000053577907,0.000032727894,0.00017400738,0.0012955237,0.00008963658,0.00013373878,0.00042179634,0.0000018391675],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022258148,0.000009225809,0.0016122772,0.000024699679,0.000054322853,0.000023069237,0.9138023,5.0462985e-9,0.0000026109426,0.08270345,0.0008713436,0.0008744365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021370596,0.00006936418,0.037663754,0.0002889962,0.000090682486,0.000009220913,0.8374872,0.0000028864572,0.000022080547,0.014374193,0.10745073,0.00040380593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012665299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037964818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31296122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022160888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006355036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47734112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1724172845","doi":"10.1111/heyj.12247","title":"A (Reconstructed) New Natural Law Account of Sexuate Selfhood and Rape's Harm","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Heythrop Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Citation; Library science; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.05382590675346862,"score_gpt":0.3285243597631367,"score_spread":0.2746984530096681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1724172845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96455824,0.005711259,0.000014510838,0.01825284,0.001333198,0.00019941379,0.0000043741443,0.000040027055,0.009886149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99651575,0.00054262177,0.0006580122,0.00027254643,0.00090241246,0.0000012294572,3.7109947e-7,0.000007802286,0.0010992809],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853325,0.00024147348,0.00025697536,0.000113185444,0.00053534243,0.00031978625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903196,0.000109896006,0.00022272741,0.00008890077,0.00029845219,0.0002480862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009505303,0.00012505832,0.00022893902,0.000020032672,0.001034517,0.00017479266,0.00028403715,0.000062947496,0.000102595994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023762367,0.00007106555,0.00006976542,0.00015158912,0.0009417345,0.0003851141,0.00009992515,0.00039536512,0.00001913201],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032705496,0.0001647112,0.017320948,0.00004265878,0.0011667982,0.00006849228,0.7295008,0.000039694816,0.0020030288,0.071800224,0.099385016,0.07818062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006873409,0.0004781704,0.035595503,0.0002469057,0.00048671738,0.00121882,0.43428212,0.00016949246,0.0010019285,0.05806881,0.46036133,0.0012167823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065746736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022070475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36097634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014065535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022922477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99389833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1731472568","doi":"","title":"Treaty Lands and Crown Obligations: The \"Tracts Taken Up\" Provision","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Scholarship","score_opus":0.0198373508236737,"score_gpt":0.3049903042489493,"score_spread":0.2851529534252756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1731472568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96119803,0.006396484,0.000113373986,0.024020966,0.00021464474,0.00027128158,0.0000010416156,0.000047582842,0.007736605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9666231,0.023147563,0.000027270135,0.00011325636,0.0005566065,0.0000082067345,0.0000011011927,0.0000069345274,0.00951594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790245,0.00018423614,0.00016857195,0.00013582615,0.00036216935,0.0012467427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994722,0.00013037921,0.00011729129,0.00007266451,0.000121058685,0.0000863802],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016232947,0.00010706246,0.000119962046,0.000027035865,0.0024660106,0.00021311957,0.00020992097,0.00007125014,0.00004011143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034230037,0.00006026109,0.00006491394,0.0002171098,0.00023988044,0.00034678762,0.00003107165,0.000828369,0.000018468965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021152929,0.0001871273,0.13318697,0.000008991884,0.0005300599,0.000015908377,0.09586307,0.00003014459,0.00044540063,0.42917836,0.004081339,0.33626112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002018037,0.0004426992,0.14004661,0.00006180862,0.00017073331,0.00033118183,0.1738622,0.00006263823,0.00005416289,0.24469796,0.4376824,0.00056957314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026297665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022904675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43360105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064927473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005868055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99883264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1735971894","doi":"","title":"LEAF and the Supreme Court of Canada Appeal of Health Services and Support-Facilities Subsector Bargaining Assn. v. British Columbia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Supreme court; Ethnology; Law; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.01847224957400527,"score_gpt":0.23239943573549904,"score_spread":0.21392718616149375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1735971894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8883715,0.00005893803,0.000009530685,0.0005350723,0.00009418092,0.00060122774,0.00012971422,0.000034862136,0.110164925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97858423,0.020894218,0.000093922594,0.00008159165,0.00003454276,7.347453e-7,0.000005019431,0.0000064609694,0.00029926116],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983925,0.00028806136,0.0002560368,0.00022900988,0.00041301287,0.00042137632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989999,0.0003262784,0.0002520337,0.00010342653,0.00021685903,0.000101528734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011379771,0.00010783667,0.0003826834,0.0002682785,0.00097212684,0.00007841188,0.00023594072,0.00007063129,0.00003940621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000090345224,0.000120719735,0.000051063347,0.0012482889,0.00090016396,0.00024113177,0.0001577741,0.00012782437,1.2605211e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032955687,0.00013306577,0.31145886,0.0011501047,0.00051500916,0.000089845526,0.65391403,0.0000047225335,0.000010433193,0.005228416,0.0021900279,0.024975909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014827859,0.00008811066,0.05835116,0.000110280875,0.000041742405,0.0000033534805,0.21810031,0.000012868956,0.000014682589,0.0000043598543,0.7215964,0.0001939531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99937433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71940637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000292391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009342396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7476912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W176171999","doi":"10.29173/alr393","title":"Child Representation in Alberta: Role and Responsibilities of Counsel for the Child in Family Proceedings","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Guardian; Law; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Best interests; Legal guardian; Action (physics); Political science; Family law; Representation (politics); Professional conduct; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.045978180188612265,"score_gpt":0.3401539981842174,"score_spread":0.2941758179956051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W176171999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37812132,0.2956823,7.006548e-7,0.08992636,0.00019843593,0.0059511615,0.000008046493,0.000020636897,0.23009104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9450433,0.05201345,0.000050057228,0.0012780596,0.00007047327,0.00029640092,0.0000032911648,0.000009349856,0.0012355819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878997,0.00012373047,0.00037540647,0.00023142145,0.00025831108,0.00022117689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983244,0.0011985151,0.00014413924,0.00010669521,0.00017266102,0.00005360415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013515649,0.00011386909,0.00035979494,0.000018029052,0.00024602647,0.000034028544,0.00018007362,0.000058805133,0.0000060914927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033747917,0.00007355,0.00006326847,0.00031570037,0.00037141336,0.00029241637,0.000046317597,0.000107419284,0.0000036570952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016492038,0.00014589612,0.047214184,0.0015735076,0.00008081104,5.079055e-7,0.19799154,0.000005744849,0.000016021406,0.7422271,0.0053249015,0.005254901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088423426,0.00007479557,0.03644456,0.003351641,0.000087080436,0.0000019837282,0.025072047,0.000039679147,0.00002831013,0.0034079498,0.9303438,0.00026388493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40208125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41492873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9250189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081824066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037406244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60190034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1765200905","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1009","title":"Charter and Context: The Facts For Which We Need Evidence, and the Mysterious Other Ones","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Context (archaeology); Political science; History; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.08167069439336848,"score_gpt":0.34771969685595805,"score_spread":0.26604900246258956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1765200905","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009233941,0.63522196,0.000015968179,0.34700343,0.00022051296,0.0034030362,0.000007996188,0.00004789959,0.0048452355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6318084,0.35857838,0.000018811994,0.007693896,0.00021119337,0.0002386699,5.86703e-7,0.000009955415,0.0014400869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985412,0.00041264395,0.00024905358,0.00021748831,0.00027883225,0.00030078675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849945,0.00090876414,0.00011853344,0.00018009963,0.00022221671,0.00007091995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015808177,0.00016123214,0.00040827243,0.000005482438,0.0012710176,0.0001705667,0.00024603395,0.000055119523,0.00010839184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006876286,0.0000712722,0.00009209295,0.00014228451,0.0009118504,0.00023934979,0.000076359385,0.000103640166,0.000023002289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029225065,0.00010214486,0.0074368645,0.0050293584,0.0007193194,0.000005376069,0.14565094,5.1306193e-7,0.00009272476,0.6170236,0.08380986,0.13983707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039022195,0.000021976246,0.0007128737,0.0018316495,0.00013018036,0.0000032623082,0.0023357898,0.000007541386,0.0000016836067,0.0006604577,0.9937779,0.00012651863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048958124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023718134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90996796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003402874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024494031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99409646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W176921812","doi":"","title":"Conversations about Families in Canadian Courts and Legislatures: Are there \"Lessons\" for the United States?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hofstra law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05314811017678399,"score_gpt":0.34363492783819866,"score_spread":0.29048681766141465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W176921812","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04592551,0.702992,0.000016926944,0.20889975,0.0005343366,0.00588402,0.00038536225,0.00010162437,0.03526044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6903291,0.30416664,0.00006672684,0.0049183983,0.00003394512,0.0001455952,0.000018897805,0.0000079407655,0.00031278096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890274,0.00023123267,0.00017804441,0.00015936019,0.00015270869,0.00037588968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990863,0.00044041235,0.00008591393,0.000115927156,0.00013370575,0.0001377224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006057077,0.0001199866,0.00022957766,0.000020826352,0.0011405565,0.00008349228,0.00014086474,0.000059563325,0.00007625585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055628107,0.00007588433,0.00005810427,0.0002302333,0.0004777333,0.000103359096,0.000009016072,0.00013142508,0.0000065405825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017977507,0.000015363503,0.0026775287,0.00054323295,0.000061276995,0.000007113334,0.013204087,0.000012413671,4.569649e-7,0.9680559,0.013637487,0.0017833149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013177228,0.0000053438107,0.006384834,0.00065358414,0.00004526716,4.4809389e-7,0.008901086,0.0000075548446,8.949295e-7,0.0010383158,0.98271704,0.000113884584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7285708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95559406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96907955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017277378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001506267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8772354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1774390520","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1030534","title":"The History and Future of the 'Legal Family' in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal history; Political science; History; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.0074656229943788534,"score_gpt":0.23409725845326199,"score_spread":0.22663163545888312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1774390520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92310184,0.0560583,0.0000040596956,0.012658307,0.0013313156,0.00012114112,6.0896105e-7,0.0000033086865,0.0067210933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844805,0.013109466,0.0000039431584,0.0001397256,0.00044358918,8.7752505e-7,4.653079e-8,0.0000034537325,0.0018184119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981068,0.0001362689,0.00018043525,0.00006925393,0.0003891575,0.0011181041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995828,0.00012694896,0.000122008845,0.000059170674,0.000063766594,0.000045296612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002223403,0.00006631165,0.00009395014,0.000011401923,0.0007617892,0.000013858936,0.00027579002,0.000037054375,0.0000050807867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008576538,0.000033831322,0.00004149366,0.000115785726,0.00025115884,0.000075491196,0.000032710243,0.0009630888,2.6764732e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000823809,0.000030712767,0.11006104,0.0000064999244,0.00017273794,0.000008763604,0.02460189,0.0000067053375,0.00028267197,0.7056259,0.009395963,0.14972475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019234658,0.000016864175,0.14429924,0.0000062217437,0.000008920549,0.000008826886,0.17260934,0.0000013050677,0.000006307638,0.0045310035,0.6782462,0.000073409254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93510675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70109487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00881874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00700107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W177593734","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1060","title":"Peering into the Bedrooms of the Province: An Examination of the Different Definitions of Spouse in the Family Law Act and the Ontario Works Act, 1997","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peering; Spouse; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.035919147945312375,"score_gpt":0.30085398466448343,"score_spread":0.26493483671917106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W177593734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97749186,0.00019228896,4.777386e-7,0.013809873,0.00005158083,0.00026542426,0.0000054091865,0.0000018582222,0.008181203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985486,0.00046054885,0.000006957883,0.00060444034,0.00028613565,0.0000045708553,2.9987615e-7,0.0000040437158,0.000084365],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820274,0.000747488,0.00034873406,0.000063482024,0.0004872949,0.00015025218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990444,0.00035385534,0.00037923802,0.00009753962,0.000100526544,0.00002444402],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011280881,0.0000956759,0.00024185081,0.000014481209,0.0013089085,0.000075007076,0.00041496623,0.000077245204,0.0000065702097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008710844,0.000034245542,0.0001487871,0.00015015568,0.0019703803,0.0001985518,0.000066158136,0.00035961025,7.060981e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054999924,0.000101837286,0.0019499826,0.000012690825,0.000056131757,2.9468444e-7,0.66600776,0.000014863447,0.000107970074,0.3254012,0.000030127329,0.0062621543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087517407,0.00007091741,0.9150286,0.000099255274,0.00010493712,0.0000023707248,0.06540418,0.000006025851,0.00007282496,0.014482463,0.0037715957,0.00008169288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20386834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4248953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9130786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014319258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013128917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1778150094","doi":"","title":"An ethical framework to understanding Canada's mature minor doctrine","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open ULeth Scholarship (OPUS) (University of Lethbridge)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minor (academic); Doctrine; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05656591951497585,"score_gpt":0.3483879996001119,"score_spread":0.29182208008513605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1778150094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7695022,0.000783774,0.0005542078,0.11190506,0.002816645,0.004317178,0.00042957804,0.00025704497,0.10943428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669318,0.0002591868,0.007787092,0.002303402,0.00036562918,0.0000027200638,0.00042909454,0.00004411279,0.021876914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952531,0.000939459,0.0003432357,0.0009278181,0.001702463,0.0008339264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725187,0.00044693568,0.00050433393,0.0005467803,0.00049918034,0.00075090455],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018988729,0.00048585745,0.0009426687,0.00017808515,0.0032416475,0.00052968704,0.003061483,0.0018414052,0.0005117872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000993994,0.00056993996,0.00022286184,0.0009263587,0.00027448448,0.00097628345,0.00025145893,0.0036127756,0.00004558376],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039153225,0.0007522813,0.01133813,0.0009820666,0.001535097,0.0011760589,0.337388,0.00015137045,0.0020679275,0.430429,0.17547058,0.034794144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014467302,0.00038424425,0.30709445,0.00224877,0.0005758775,0.0000032877417,0.35467115,0.000006988359,0.00030026166,0.008072005,0.32258853,0.0026077104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80607855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9611672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.422357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025907522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016492134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W17783591","doi":"10.1126/science.13.319.211","title":"Challenging English-Canadian Orthodoxy on Democracy and Constitutional Change","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitution; Orthodoxy; Democracy; Elite; Conversation; Law; Humanities; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.07178905838013909,"score_gpt":0.3030945892290276,"score_spread":0.2313055308488885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W17783591","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18215847,0.009638367,0.0010634356,0.090885825,0.0029348114,0.0027943493,0.00014366925,0.00090482086,0.70947623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946542,0.0023305116,0.00058940885,0.0009820975,0.001203468,0.000029344705,0.000013566753,0.0000048946795,0.00019255617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843603,0.00012673046,0.00023814537,0.0003834486,0.0002741157,0.0005415454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989262,0.00023058655,0.00008184049,0.0001362133,0.00022619197,0.00039892967],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004262758,0.0002214189,0.00026681976,0.00013902648,0.003603062,0.00014269626,0.00018881398,0.00016861816,0.00012347313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009888947,0.00021003888,0.00008858028,0.00024015961,0.003210172,0.0004312675,0.000029742821,0.00022817016,0.000066588946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064054866,0.000037188827,0.0027674793,0.000010982061,0.000027591079,0.00002570308,0.010487907,0.00004027522,0.000012593296,0.9810936,0.00020579199,0.0052844933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010907907,0.00014660398,0.033401597,0.00072296115,0.00010498334,0.000030092766,0.02500392,0.00014997642,0.000036095087,0.008954375,0.9291778,0.0011807691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061218264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020467483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97213924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040839278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030828593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1780446522","doi":"10.15353/cjds.v4i3.233","title":"Moving from the Implicit to the Explicit: ‘Spiritual Rights’ and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Disability Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Convention; Law; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Political science; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.08476779260325165,"score_gpt":0.32316522806993186,"score_spread":0.2383974354666802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1780446522","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8040909,0.000842442,0.0000040244395,0.1927653,0.00019601989,0.00054655795,0.000075017975,0.000004836828,0.0014748736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989063,0.000035476452,0.00002083498,0.00047140248,0.0003055541,0.000040549065,9.938582e-7,0.000004599265,0.0002142695],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978041,0.0009166313,0.0003535122,0.0001487492,0.00049694703,0.00028003438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926945,0.0059167957,0.00022183142,0.00025101987,0.0006912231,0.00022461858],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020078735,0.00015627599,0.00031030536,0.000052664545,0.003996177,0.00013241453,0.00050110376,0.00003888955,0.000022810189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053886264,0.000050924507,0.00012584147,0.0006704508,0.0053807194,0.00015024678,0.000055898465,0.00026591282,0.0000025401682],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007978386,0.000030981988,0.037155855,0.0000064359933,0.00050739525,7.6389045e-7,0.75327533,0.000071637056,0.0000012585534,0.19469911,0.014075434,0.00009603889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005068111,0.00012394076,0.036980946,0.00009595029,0.00015580017,0.0000015338322,0.8867947,0.0000075457588,0.000010758929,0.0137910675,0.06142185,0.00010910737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46628678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92204267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45575592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050563336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019065019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1785276250","doi":"","title":"Fundamental justice : section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Irwin Law eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Political science; Economic Justice; Fundamental rights; Law; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.02749355643614702,"score_gpt":0.2688117696838131,"score_spread":0.24131821324766609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1785276250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053321826,0.00030177037,1.8622875e-7,0.00023586898,0.0014352931,0.00047311917,0.00009053169,0.000014226456,0.9921168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6348417,0.0000050235976,0.000016047696,0.00008458187,0.0008387845,0.0000094789175,0.00000356343,0.000009383679,0.36419144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988209,0.00010757511,0.00021912693,0.00015826817,0.00040445267,0.0002896562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999279,0.00008456953,0.00022331193,0.00014305227,0.00012216004,0.00014789023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002525194,0.00016305262,0.00027248924,0.000026847865,0.0011971582,0.000030682597,0.00021170978,0.0003181052,0.000116013456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018139823,0.00010745445,0.00011093614,0.000020860603,0.0020294916,0.00006169035,0.00006854186,0.00023993303,0.0000071768645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001212115,0.000020358193,0.00030674634,0.00022923038,0.00025997148,0.0000018645653,0.093101986,3.148159e-7,0.00015711017,0.88203377,0.023026839,0.00084966474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015355423,0.00002228632,0.0013544777,0.00013061256,0.00024891563,9.2901746e-7,0.0009401363,3.1965592e-7,0.00010475485,0.0042084064,0.992659,0.00017663208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7763114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9586347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96963215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056238356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025089277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92076945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1785387284","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1241","title":"Sexual Assault Cases in the Supreme Court of Canada: Losing Sight of Substantive Equality?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Sexual assault; Law; Substantive due process; Political science; Credibility; Substantive law; Mythology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.09693128402642802,"score_gpt":0.3550192984585977,"score_spread":0.25808801443216967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1785387284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4927686,0.4179931,0.000019624204,0.02572573,0.0009903155,0.0037312442,0.00032446682,0.00006342476,0.058383513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98996115,0.008784794,0.00006951324,0.00076384627,0.00016820565,0.00002974075,0.00001023733,0.000011406241,0.00020109286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99570525,0.0013075348,0.00074907363,0.00021905503,0.0013706125,0.0006484606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763185,0.0010374095,0.0003990516,0.0002910939,0.0005166759,0.00012392331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041075964,0.00022411233,0.00076573115,0.000017690372,0.00042730325,0.000020071044,0.0005122252,0.00010075407,0.00023900806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013452718,0.00014631492,0.0001286836,0.00048890326,0.0006457981,0.00037106517,0.00008348702,0.0002597107,0.000005490705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008002926,0.0012116275,0.14350642,0.011603137,0.0006347753,0.00007262973,0.14719424,0.0000122959555,0.0016679845,0.58423316,0.105599195,0.0041845175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036024413,0.00007181477,0.01956976,0.002891568,0.0003202478,0.0000068555705,0.023809211,0.0000024726517,0.000619918,0.00014377377,0.9516778,0.0005263643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7787537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8976688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8460786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004025189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041772486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59665495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1787790696","doi":"","title":"Benevolent Grandfathers and Savage Beasts: Comparative Canadian Customary Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.07665035861705931,"score_gpt":0.3391201210979738,"score_spread":0.26246976248091447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1787790696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008163958,0.26247996,8.308183e-7,0.0012021988,0.0002714856,0.00090620044,0.000059745973,0.000038317157,0.7268773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89259326,0.10572733,0.000048073714,0.001427694,0.000079235906,0.00003689956,0.000016350054,0.000008209002,0.000062966836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985632,0.00013163466,0.0003582786,0.0002507879,0.00029605688,0.00040004175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915326,0.00003010037,0.00016866387,0.00014141442,0.0001351665,0.00037139177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005318146,0.0002068397,0.00052780414,0.000015818061,0.0008719534,0.000027795617,0.00018208657,0.000064563355,0.00007763118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000116030615,0.00013703591,0.000103420345,0.00011790706,0.001394449,0.00029040658,0.00007175263,0.00015634652,0.000012769031],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060859156,0.000036486348,0.00017604025,0.0010893294,0.00004667108,0.0000012104705,0.011572872,7.3608803e-9,0.0000012362626,0.98005134,0.00042594736,0.006592777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023443934,0.000054629603,0.0010244277,0.0026277571,0.00008238451,0.0000011954238,0.00211284,5.0622134e-7,0.000021990785,0.001083414,0.99253553,0.00022087412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6087757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74310243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9921096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002209265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055002176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6706449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W179279375","doi":"","title":"Changing the Rules of Succession to the Throne","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Throne; Sovereignty; Realm; Parliamentary sovereignty; Successor cardinal; Government (linguistics); Statute; Legislature; Constitution; Ecological succession; Power (physics); Law; Relevance (law); Political science; Queen (butterfly); History; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.029434930468199307,"score_gpt":0.30109057292000196,"score_spread":0.2716556424518027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W179279375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9591007,0.0048289387,0.000928542,0.019572664,0.0004604694,0.00034857343,0.0000014914624,0.00002945672,0.014729118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99521023,0.0024153667,0.00006096348,0.00013858285,0.00047929626,0.0000070751007,1.5816711e-7,0.0000060755788,0.0016822742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777097,0.00022534693,0.00016271224,0.0000879848,0.00038119522,0.0013718175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952745,0.0000799466,0.00013520586,0.00009660385,0.00011232005,0.00004849032],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030228896,0.00008175435,0.000111935726,0.000029766046,0.0020239572,0.000035497793,0.00055787794,0.000038675636,0.00008435926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019752988,0.00003601107,0.00008824039,0.00022498076,0.00021064971,0.00013558092,0.00008928289,0.0006360813,0.000037717586],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004083219,0.00005333265,0.0028527742,0.0000034262723,0.00018968665,8.442429e-7,0.32265815,0.0000071507984,0.00024613683,0.62149066,0.00047799782,0.05197904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004015121,0.00030581493,0.020924894,0.00008195011,0.000103210186,0.000022314956,0.7636577,0.000010556955,0.0008347337,0.16569747,0.047649853,0.0003100249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031779185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013943556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45579317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041041407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036177176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1796568189","doi":"10.15353/cjds.v4i3.229","title":"Entre l’accommodement de la croyance religieuse et l’accommodement du handicap en milieu scolaire: les tribunaux devraient-ils adapter leur analyse?","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Disability Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.07616781252069249,"score_gpt":0.35148170591785255,"score_spread":0.27531389339716006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1796568189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7736743,0.09942622,0.000049329698,0.1226222,0.0014589105,0.0004984563,0.00012484996,0.00002160581,0.0021241386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891466,0.0072141523,0.0012758768,0.00080682733,0.0008966243,0.000037862806,0.000004439465,0.00003221164,0.0005854296],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922155,0.0032745553,0.0014142733,0.000531657,0.0010656416,0.0014983668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938701,0.0015797702,0.00076644245,0.00039335163,0.0012660442,0.0021243405],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073413723,0.00060890254,0.0012803177,0.0001152699,0.0016689826,0.00034268346,0.0009834258,0.0003392724,0.00016282502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007808019,0.0005111076,0.0006190725,0.00057068025,0.005761922,0.00081468065,0.0002643331,0.00093352824,0.00003302358],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007389239,0.00037057363,0.71480215,0.00013329524,0.0017410378,0.000108448934,0.2049449,0.0011346369,0.0000053422136,0.003411515,0.067398965,0.0058752783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024900045,0.00058046833,0.2514328,0.00080344256,0.0011544452,0.000030635463,0.38815498,0.000072903465,0.00005868584,0.005231884,0.34906995,0.00091980066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24088718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80289316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.562006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011273262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003040208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1796634019","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1004","title":"Anticipation: Expressive Freedom and the Supreme Court of Canada in the New Millennium","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Supreme court; Trilogy; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Institution; Law; Fresh Start; Political science; Legislature; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Economics","score_opus":0.039816830484869094,"score_gpt":0.3104606522187074,"score_spread":0.2706438217338383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1796634019","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022148004,0.57199264,0.000021620244,0.32950494,0.00072255364,0.0038387552,0.000029597866,0.000040310773,0.071701564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75625765,0.23824523,0.000091047696,0.00396799,0.0003787845,0.00008578446,0.0000048783345,0.000010508534,0.000958133],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974672,0.00073352363,0.00044297308,0.00021602197,0.00076191087,0.00037837186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855506,0.0006430581,0.00020749049,0.0002811701,0.00021891443,0.000094313495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001608294,0.00017163901,0.00050183275,0.000009055493,0.0006494607,0.00004808944,0.0005402314,0.000057336034,0.0002399394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000726245,0.000088722445,0.000097796605,0.00031512536,0.00084607856,0.00016487013,0.000088128705,0.00019169053,0.0000042508946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072036644,0.00008853075,0.0063995486,0.00092875556,0.00017809306,0.000034243512,0.046349857,0.000023226847,0.000026658472,0.20111234,0.74185914,0.002927553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005686524,0.000012970674,0.0033287457,0.0009354792,0.00009596506,0.0000029304988,0.0032469684,0.000010467907,0.00000584928,0.00038724463,0.9912564,0.00014829192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.796257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90990907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73410964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012191872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031374343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49951926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1798509042","doi":"10.15353/cjds.v4i3.228","title":"Introduction: Law, Religion, Disability","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Disability Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law and Religion; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.07447783812540515,"score_gpt":0.34656170016388704,"score_spread":0.2720838620384819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1798509042","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6975619,0.009501069,0.000004020867,0.2777977,0.0042346483,0.00034813743,0.00001796904,0.000036975653,0.010497567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951882,0.00021280097,0.0002449915,0.00029207254,0.0037057446,0.0000072780754,9.258276e-7,0.000007984418,0.00034002122],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763715,0.00048696663,0.0005957362,0.00024704955,0.0005339053,0.0004991932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966205,0.0002815476,0.0002343201,0.00024572219,0.0015590906,0.001058868],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025483905,0.00017767918,0.0004928363,0.00002177809,0.0012963264,0.00009775187,0.00034952944,0.00009169933,0.00008795606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009242998,0.00013681735,0.00020187968,0.00033434,0.007959083,0.000521947,0.000044218046,0.00028126294,0.000030915155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049701823,0.00013439081,0.44215462,0.000054879198,0.00042505914,0.000017655439,0.15572996,0.000059627906,0.0000024039578,0.0655764,0.33328384,0.0025114487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003422335,0.00012433656,0.02835316,0.000026421587,0.000078389225,0.000007687569,0.18223137,3.9401684e-7,0.0000124977705,0.016804315,0.771792,0.00022721034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15043476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7764818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.626047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004160549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064082746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1804800675","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1012","title":"“Grand Entrance Hall,” Back Door or Foundation Stone? the Role of Constitutional Principles in Construing and Applying the Constitution of Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Foundation (evidence); Law; Classics; Philosophy; Sociology; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.043648682914405844,"score_gpt":0.3029809875130487,"score_spread":0.25933230459864287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1804800675","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20194042,0.39292026,0.000499057,0.035337783,0.00080582214,0.013350168,0.00014196898,0.000057757145,0.3549468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631772,0.036258917,0.00014038423,0.00023853753,0.000028766972,0.00007372958,0.0000033427366,0.000001703482,0.000077439574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987304,0.00019413853,0.0003718532,0.0001311669,0.0003835857,0.00018884568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991411,0.0003322945,0.00020627456,0.00009776104,0.00018615004,0.000036443616],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000942743,0.00009652355,0.0002715699,0.000006758846,0.0006071178,0.000021624108,0.00016545622,0.000032485845,0.00012302306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043014088,0.000051761428,0.000040024817,0.00018074669,0.003069657,0.00014558449,0.000038631362,0.00009860119,0.0000013464162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016885799,0.00001645482,0.009397039,0.00034509413,0.000033705168,0.0000011612717,0.0011686006,0.00009419897,0.00009385678,0.9837578,0.00013085356,0.004944379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028715597,0.000007518055,0.0014247586,0.0018896308,0.00005899355,0.0000072837115,0.0020112314,0.00013539722,0.000091759124,0.00052494946,0.99344605,0.00011526849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20604767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7622508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9933152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001427583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067667366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1805164954","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1291","title":"The Aboriginal Constitution","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Proclamation; Honour; Parallels; Law; Metis; Supreme court; Political science; Subject (documents); History; Library science; Engineering","score_opus":0.03198981137321786,"score_gpt":0.35548339706523163,"score_spread":0.32349358569201375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1805164954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00061558664,0.17325895,0.00013587716,0.074819505,0.0012438502,0.0011100451,0.000004689376,0.00019206572,0.74861944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59600055,0.393349,0.00031545613,0.0057629175,0.0010870849,0.0001247652,0.000006164388,0.0000095384985,0.0033445114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985457,0.0003852182,0.0002070127,0.00015315073,0.00040653496,0.00030235975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991982,0.00024761367,0.00008659814,0.0001726325,0.00020850662,0.00008646055],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016667836,0.000102382044,0.00020674053,0.0000032199428,0.002269077,0.00008875644,0.00029131348,0.00004186001,0.00015098804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052048796,0.000058668094,0.00010391127,0.00013474151,0.0010823838,0.00015295805,0.000026113925,0.000120103694,0.00040841807],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.208622e-7,0.0000056717718,0.00012731417,0.000090277485,0.000012093378,3.2290694e-7,0.0002803015,1.8215714e-7,0.000003843227,0.9715954,0.020754123,0.0071295183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005916113,0.000008426074,0.00016636688,0.00044260127,0.000040682906,5.587504e-7,0.00010173624,0.0000022819331,0.0000041942444,0.0011537975,0.9979246,0.00009556083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039635794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060675195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9771705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011433107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007146942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1809332466","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1273","title":"Three Theories of “Principles of Fundamental Justice”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Fundamental rights; Political science; Charter; Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Sociology; Human rights; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0690053156794604,"score_gpt":0.3428734720913906,"score_spread":0.2738681564119302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1809332466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12457736,0.42140287,0.0000967618,0.021380315,0.0011664391,0.0048681917,0.000090736175,0.00019060935,0.4262267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9479826,0.050031085,0.0008109401,0.00042928595,0.00013640877,0.000071675364,0.000004386735,0.0000101845,0.0005234089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984596,0.00014254398,0.00046116178,0.00016503727,0.0005070739,0.00026462486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988437,0.00021408327,0.00026314985,0.0002064421,0.0003922486,0.000080335485],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006759348,0.00013720793,0.00050398277,0.000009722601,0.00033924932,0.00002306288,0.00035355697,0.000056212804,0.0019045932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045591913,0.000096811375,0.00017953817,0.00017178307,0.001126834,0.00025792216,0.00012987162,0.00008693791,0.00011619775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024642043,0.00005253408,0.0032036125,0.0025015448,0.00007410015,3.752671e-7,0.0025327455,5.1490025e-7,0.00019198394,0.98627454,0.0028667126,0.0022988855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002578669,0.00008129695,0.011860987,0.0037569434,0.00048147514,7.051426e-7,0.005186427,0.0000053211097,0.0003168233,0.011519361,0.9661816,0.00035122436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014845437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005978166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97475517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007015752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004982428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1809684683","doi":"10.7202/028101ar","title":"Conciliation : The End of Compulsory Boards","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Conciliation; Nova scotia; Legislature; Political science; Law; Arbitration; Sociology; Ethnology","score_opus":0.04771465919461898,"score_gpt":0.3093931287138139,"score_spread":0.26167846951919493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1809684683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75018936,0.001358373,0.00018393206,0.0790827,0.00023659442,0.00045501825,0.00001575901,0.00008688284,0.16839135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99271214,0.000117721786,0.00033827793,0.00008929551,0.00029399624,0.000009304279,0.000004339246,0.000003241457,0.0064317132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991246,0.00015034282,0.000194302,0.0000863962,0.00030783136,0.00013653075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991825,0.00042461508,0.00011550216,0.00009518545,0.00014818256,0.000034011668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038412857,0.000060362705,0.00009034221,0.000021989545,0.0009419458,0.000021621847,0.0001433592,0.00013244062,0.00041040216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005400202,0.000041855248,0.00005031044,0.00027377595,0.000592306,0.00013924463,0.000030877687,0.00019310253,0.00006281825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014875669,0.00017802772,0.061758623,0.0000028282434,0.00021325123,6.5249213e-7,0.24472028,0.00791709,0.00021427401,0.32011604,0.106365964,0.25849807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001720093,0.000010227362,0.03220319,0.000012084602,0.000028432389,1.5999065e-7,0.032572966,0.00025511975,0.00023558986,0.00025731078,0.9341657,0.00008720549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017726325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011618908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82779974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015973464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013193898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72447807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1814050479","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4359","title":"STATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROTECTION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS DECISION IN LENAHAN (GONZALES) AND ITS APPLICATION IN CANADA","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Due diligence; Human rights; Political science; Commission; Law; Domestic violence; International human rights law; Context (archaeology); State responsibility; Declaration; State (computer science); Economic Justice; International law; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.051554643403361425,"score_gpt":0.3801888644527322,"score_spread":0.3286342210493708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1814050479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99638283,0.00007255839,0.0001607735,0.0008868261,0.00010908544,0.0018657623,0.0000100488705,0.0000118623975,0.0005002524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994308,0.000023253366,0.000081833634,0.00011297143,0.00008550219,0.000214316,0.0000013783172,0.0000068782015,0.000043080534],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985456,0.0002602159,0.00030715973,0.00023654073,0.0003456225,0.00030484705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878687,0.0006560524,0.00017195384,0.00015224372,0.000119186334,0.000113701426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010553756,0.00011866835,0.00020516085,0.00008182986,0.00045861182,0.000036542628,0.00030366203,0.000041342977,0.000003515709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008157034,0.00008261726,0.000021759493,0.00037088286,0.00013559058,0.0002725152,0.00010498026,0.00016903471,0.0000020114824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0068501406,0.0017293252,0.27754122,0.0013196375,0.000117225514,0.000010481456,0.14708672,0.0048354557,0.02697023,0.008952356,0.002119451,0.52246773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007808612,0.00018733616,0.97639215,0.0006364334,0.00004117153,2.6440665e-7,0.0063636103,0.0006090259,0.0030321274,0.0010459198,0.010578156,0.00033295387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6842364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9091976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6988509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007811092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011795874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35273176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1815499224","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004720","title":"Beguiled By Metaphors: The “Living Tree” and Originalist Constitutional Interpretation in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitution; Doctrine; Constitutional interpretation; Law; Constitutional law; Original intent; Political science; Supreme court; Original meaning; Constitutionalism; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Democracy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.013431635003973036,"score_gpt":0.275409109206593,"score_spread":0.26197747420261996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1815499224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9446676,0.009249165,0.00009830814,0.026583225,0.0006878873,0.00024972984,0.000033706583,0.000005735082,0.018424664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985305,0.00014153431,0.000090158435,0.001061907,0.00009497716,0.0000015487187,5.360433e-7,0.0000018751244,0.00007695049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880946,0.00017938076,0.0002832596,0.0000999499,0.00033847996,0.0002894779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899024,0.00028201554,0.00016520818,0.00005345028,0.00017683007,0.00033223076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006162219,0.000092718445,0.00017516456,0.00003448897,0.00069264584,0.0001297916,0.00029153927,0.000036816204,0.000060175942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041054538,0.00006660179,0.000037575937,0.00016865377,0.00089914416,0.00035423576,0.0000069539237,0.00022931714,9.797567e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048786675,0.000038767717,0.16885212,0.00002192955,0.00017923539,0.000547202,0.11699458,0.00028299502,0.00035219136,0.6489944,0.04240579,0.021281991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067870936,0.00014938792,0.2755376,0.00088094437,0.00013077272,0.000110390196,0.037735373,0.00016232357,0.00012781126,0.003924782,0.6798829,0.0006790219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9905814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99958295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6450696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013884372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036117597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6407107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1820504405","doi":"","title":"From Consultation to Reconciliation: Aboriginal Rights and the Crown’s Duty to Consult","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Negotiation; Constitution; Political science; Law; Treaty; Good faith; Action (physics); Competence (human resources); Faith; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.01660251668214259,"score_gpt":0.321153408812515,"score_spread":0.3045508921303724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1820504405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87340724,0.000092772534,0.000030034296,0.041633815,0.00018537285,0.00064702856,0.000021267871,0.00007465461,0.08390782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.959453,0.00008263715,0.0018348494,0.0025733786,0.00043785924,0.000073486386,0.0000044808617,0.0000034274071,0.035536867],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998944,0.00017512242,0.0001708196,0.0002208282,0.00028889484,0.00020036293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987932,0.00073055044,0.000031216783,0.00008296764,0.00021249212,0.00014960735],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036170258,0.000094471805,0.00014982819,0.00001193097,0.0011243655,0.0001572957,0.0001274347,0.00005353157,0.0030116108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040266346,0.000053879245,0.000027746959,0.00021997879,0.00035444245,0.00015857576,0.000013433379,0.00006575187,0.0007040056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005671187,0.000036772333,0.0016725847,0.0000031279671,0.000101443766,0.0000031323439,0.8046401,0.000037923903,0.000094834104,0.067097224,0.08744846,0.038297262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010652975,0.000018396468,0.018220019,0.000009972741,0.000021081798,2.085029e-7,0.013708656,0.000020646945,0.00009822727,0.0026193643,0.9640606,0.000157538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13992412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0496183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8766121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011458149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004396413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1821930445","doi":"","title":"The Courts and the Colonies: The Litigation of Hutterite Church Disputes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mennonite studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.022354854563735232,"score_gpt":0.32833172565600355,"score_spread":0.30597687109226834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1821930445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8951899,0.044388033,0.0000046441323,0.056721106,0.00047454622,0.0003172602,0.0000039625365,0.000007349751,0.002893201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98128265,0.016894838,0.00006204497,0.00014000833,0.00056553783,0.000012216495,1.4735203e-7,0.000004137258,0.0010384247],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981962,0.0004861427,0.0004501181,0.000069658956,0.0005884272,0.00020947035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99593383,0.0026735184,0.0005998253,0.00008225516,0.000686557,0.00002403673],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029096624,0.00010553467,0.00028586618,0.000018152969,0.0027321284,0.00011709632,0.0002711342,0.000032659133,0.0000034884113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032648546,0.000037985912,0.000112595335,0.00013663397,0.00337005,0.00015855073,0.000110331865,0.00018832885,9.211282e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006263134,0.00015418131,0.040512025,0.00012075384,0.0028592856,0.000014237197,0.7031796,0.0000956312,0.0009765449,0.1967165,0.03811361,0.01663135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022023383,0.0002324171,0.23935369,0.00021491128,0.00041645108,0.000014261739,0.3921852,0.000021789014,0.00011396966,0.036315598,0.3287028,0.00022654235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008899709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011599355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31099436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008203202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039321807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1825135887","doi":"","title":"Full-text of APPEAL Volume 19 (2014)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Principle of legality; Charter; Political science; Human rights; Milestone; Desert (philosophy); Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.028033673872029607,"score_gpt":0.3324681279183465,"score_spread":0.3044344540463169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1825135887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076934053,0.40731648,0.000057539513,0.0064505506,0.0009863529,0.0014310444,0.00004433,0.0001113229,0.57590896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7865941,0.21147585,0.00011539499,0.000985442,0.00035678846,0.00003614042,0.000023201219,0.000014642937,0.00039844468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979879,0.00021041078,0.0006067957,0.00026350783,0.00055108225,0.00038027662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988638,0.00006653836,0.00041422877,0.00023783982,0.00022092776,0.00019663079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013547232,0.00020155207,0.00069713936,0.000014667575,0.0004799799,0.00002176953,0.0003046348,0.00008172778,0.0001486258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011582614,0.00013027298,0.00021428106,0.00015503657,0.0011491055,0.00021532067,0.00013986656,0.00016809514,0.000056706584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008819709,0.000066882654,0.0001894715,0.005728418,0.00003468361,1.615167e-7,0.001325255,8.098728e-8,0.000014956361,0.9475416,0.003561057,0.041528594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021826148,0.000097195436,0.00031276233,0.0028292048,0.00006951401,8.2528777e-7,0.00025708377,0.000003846354,0.000019655048,0.00072686444,0.9952868,0.00017793573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010875305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004173758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9917258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010533972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003748875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1827804112","doi":"","title":"Joint Custody and Guardianship in the British Columbia Courts: Not a Cautious Approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Law; Statute; Political science; Legislature; Family law","score_opus":0.016540014199596,"score_gpt":0.2599763367959041,"score_spread":0.2434363225963081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1827804112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98261786,0.0015204273,0.00003813542,0.0058194892,0.00023315981,0.00034792887,0.0000030898332,0.000028035147,0.0093918955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99350923,0.0029491885,0.000085183994,0.00029891438,0.0005671753,0.000023417595,0.0000011244799,0.00000986361,0.0025558916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969074,0.0003591031,0.0002383338,0.00020318439,0.0005087505,0.0017832329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994974,0.000102947815,0.000115102135,0.00009578275,0.00009497079,0.00009376014],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049181045,0.0001000258,0.00020450112,0.000018851651,0.0029434972,0.0015331139,0.00033278647,0.00013686968,0.00003197506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004965198,0.00009604323,0.00008975766,0.00018679313,0.0004736793,0.00022227959,0.000039362232,0.002921969,0.000006614707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007749906,0.0010725948,0.23727733,0.00006082838,0.0007777375,0.00017501536,0.23273526,0.00002211639,0.0014452704,0.308998,0.033304885,0.18405348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025252555,0.00027408954,0.41323274,0.000056510053,0.00014061184,0.0018909554,0.32365948,0.000066103115,0.0000046721634,0.15508744,0.102139264,0.0009228762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20852779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88524884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67672104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000567298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008249601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1834014602","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1115","title":"The Forgotten Right: Section 9 of the Charter, Its Purpose and Meaning","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Charter; Law; Supreme court; Framing (construction); Section (typography); Political science; State (computer science); Constitutional right; Meaning (existential); Original meaning; Sociology; Law and economics; Engineering; Epistemology; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.04615148569202904,"score_gpt":0.30328518940377447,"score_spread":0.25713370371174543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1834014602","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09285881,0.5953724,0.000009944191,0.0889917,0.0024615263,0.0051070196,0.000020976257,0.00018987611,0.21498773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8020359,0.19485205,0.000025077834,0.0007284017,0.0002592755,0.00004764151,7.061949e-7,0.00000775698,0.0020431313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873835,0.00028827135,0.00023271053,0.00013955508,0.00038363368,0.00021747021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932784,0.00013292268,0.00014589028,0.00015477776,0.00019060973,0.00004793208],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071686594,0.00010056076,0.00022508233,0.000003821497,0.0025129318,0.0000255539,0.00025674544,0.000044365792,0.000050411287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029629227,0.000047339763,0.000114145194,0.0001705625,0.0005716032,0.0001687662,0.00007020253,0.00012612947,0.000012188034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020518699,0.00012562211,0.008656068,0.0026163717,0.00039129824,0.00000959477,0.063975655,0.0000015910005,0.0009079038,0.8219302,0.0770465,0.024318635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008035959,0.000012073643,0.0021270055,0.00056983694,0.00005028919,0.0000044384274,0.00031058423,0.0000028497764,0.000079905345,0.00033361654,0.99634683,0.00008222432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012199347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004273668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9193003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059219343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029060724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W184053494","doi":"","title":"23. What’s in a Face? Demeanour Evidence in the Sexual Assault Context","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OpenEdition (OpenEdition)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Adjudication; Context (archaeology); Sexual assault; Economic Justice; Criminology; Face (sociological concept); Law; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Gender studies; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; History; Social science","score_opus":0.09156541727030972,"score_gpt":0.340454995035806,"score_spread":0.2488895777654963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W184053494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6263089,0.008414373,0.00013813209,0.3376682,0.004600056,0.0033825806,0.00006889022,0.00016781266,0.019251011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779914,0.0010471,0.00012234395,0.017686566,0.0009878164,0.0006272604,0.000068203,0.000014162966,0.0014551205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956196,0.0012844561,0.00054749975,0.00040507744,0.0012864859,0.0008569142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980021,0.0010474994,0.00022404088,0.00026854497,0.0002633616,0.00019442537],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037966394,0.00027440191,0.00035193496,0.000105026695,0.0010408863,0.00060801505,0.00073923846,0.00024911665,0.0010677244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017519047,0.00020876016,0.000089235,0.000763229,0.00044521954,0.030456424,0.00014183902,0.00052210933,0.0013075797],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029029095,0.0021370568,0.10910738,0.00014862602,0.00015837533,0.00011494589,0.31582278,0.00020131133,0.00058573444,0.41785687,0.10354337,0.05003326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010150986,0.00010353929,0.53276557,0.00043669238,0.00003659003,0.0000073104743,0.27867258,0.00002441803,0.00012301725,0.0006265642,0.18560858,0.00058002735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060793995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12716559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4236582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060376583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013372285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1843056858","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1180","title":"The Contribution of Justice Bastarache to Equality Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Legislation; Charter; Political science; Meaning (existential); Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Common law; Constitutional law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06378760393089664,"score_gpt":0.3822364383040239,"score_spread":0.3184488343731272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1843056858","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005110621,0.33450755,0.00042766414,0.36667824,0.0011749535,0.00533793,0.000061009338,0.00026979062,0.28643224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95648825,0.033345908,0.00017750704,0.009347869,0.00021619923,0.0000288427,0.0000057705925,0.00000442196,0.00038522805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978244,0.00061592803,0.00042267566,0.00018904635,0.0005719875,0.00037598985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984865,0.00038033034,0.0001652067,0.0002427039,0.00059544714,0.0001298137],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029465526,0.00012741216,0.00037536246,0.0000039609567,0.0013649722,0.00005201716,0.0003711569,0.000058546375,0.00008259998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015844294,0.00007871892,0.00015115998,0.00025419836,0.0003957201,0.00016401103,0.000053792024,0.00013011626,0.000091555405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075018665,0.000027449123,0.000023108134,0.0001397213,0.00001843974,4.1618543e-7,0.00096772524,7.431887e-7,0.000069889116,0.9879029,0.0064757857,0.004366363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008951546,0.00004002615,0.0005576517,0.0005815179,0.00015298136,1.9501569e-7,0.00037779234,0.0000011347072,0.000083413855,0.0019190884,0.9960792,0.00011749113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005592008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011551338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9896034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016947559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043609147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W184493464","doi":"","title":"CONVERSATIONS ON ABORTION AND RELATED MATTERS ARISING FROM A CONSIDERATION OF DOBSON V. DOBSON","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia canonica","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.03187984240019163,"score_gpt":0.29538068576642396,"score_spread":0.2635008433662323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W184493464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96399325,0.00038807205,0.0000070981614,0.011367901,0.00027955053,0.0003243636,0.000026203916,0.0000558758,0.023557695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984355,0.00072128756,0.00028073785,0.00026195814,0.000061886945,0.000014105312,0.000011162286,0.0000063707807,0.0002069842],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989062,0.00015743994,0.00024791347,0.00021284334,0.0002976626,0.00017794456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921364,0.00034303562,0.00016395129,0.000090582434,0.00012664699,0.00006211975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016477969,0.00010172472,0.00020449875,0.000032266016,0.0009692168,0.000023862298,0.00005490955,0.000087883294,0.000117007956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026544457,0.00009143168,0.00004628183,0.00016273164,0.000503056,0.00015546053,0.0000284133,0.000116443895,0.000019040413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015204393,0.00036470007,0.22743809,0.00003753285,0.0009501367,0.000049543807,0.5838874,0.00016219386,0.012643516,0.13811575,0.034160584,0.002038506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014892527,0.00012972039,0.9300701,0.00010120478,0.00013087707,0.0000019223878,0.031376313,0.000011992553,0.0011532053,0.0006633063,0.034509145,0.00036292904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02858712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005883829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.702632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002188823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041087606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9778816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1849557891","doi":"10.59962/9780774816762-004","title":"Rationalizing Judicial Power: The Mischief of Dialogue Theory","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.019898162243613588,"score_gpt":0.21654317175650492,"score_spread":0.19664500951289132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1849557891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028543684,0.00050586957,0.000017262917,0.000118019176,0.0003699658,0.0006011614,0.00049430045,0.000046856872,0.9949922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10208855,0.0005432568,0.000204194,0.000055601267,0.0002472603,8.921106e-7,0.00001927437,0.000020795273,0.8968202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985105,0.00016372874,0.00022542928,0.0002739833,0.0006040928,0.00022225638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845535,0.00036723661,0.00044527667,0.00019991159,0.0004515014,0.00008074936],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005038522,0.00011973266,0.00040884895,0.000018682369,0.0012638444,0.00009410307,0.0006720393,0.00042611267,0.0007449781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012609895,0.00019473812,0.00028695006,0.000010065456,0.0033127111,0.00008187242,0.00028468145,0.0004535965,0.00000424139],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001270381,0.000095174044,0.00019031657,0.0001661099,0.0012733858,0.000137485,0.0715285,0.0000020778402,0.00032612262,0.8156948,0.07960465,0.030854352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003479116,0.000032594442,0.0010441752,0.00024487864,0.0001969849,0.0000021796604,0.0025289028,3.0298258e-7,0.000008783408,0.016786579,0.9785376,0.00026907685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47170326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7080596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.898933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008062301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018287786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W185557668","doi":"10.29173/alr376","title":"Will the Circle be Unbroken? Aboriginal Communities, Restora tive Justice, and the Challenges of Conflictand Change, Jane Dickson-Gilmore &amp; Carol La Prairie","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Criminology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11146820095939824,"score_gpt":0.3729026412689713,"score_spread":0.2614344403095731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W185557668","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011867647,0.66960233,6.4665664e-7,0.1786376,0.00025831503,0.0020024588,0.000029903633,0.000029029727,0.13757205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6377953,0.35731864,0.000022883589,0.003264414,0.00027834685,0.00022943944,0.000009023452,0.000015375866,0.0010665413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970171,0.0016718864,0.00030887395,0.00017978824,0.00051545806,0.00030689538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99596006,0.002874075,0.00027560545,0.00040023765,0.0003545272,0.00013547062],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020614804,0.00020046263,0.0005725247,0.000009413813,0.0009406466,0.000057119363,0.000514059,0.00009435528,0.000029449113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082607847,0.00010791832,0.00010091232,0.00019379832,0.0035028576,0.00032319332,0.00013044161,0.0002947226,0.000011312635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032348617,0.000043924345,0.00028572863,0.00095110096,0.00015081275,0.0000014558433,0.21232174,2.3683964e-7,3.9826978e-7,0.7766567,0.0067151072,0.0028404607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051219476,0.000033883236,0.00087885716,0.0010621033,0.0004912729,0.000003687576,0.0182532,0.0000014502109,4.5156725e-7,0.00032872419,0.9782829,0.00015127056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18931602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32034484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9715678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071034854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009176057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1857043480","doi":"","title":"Table of Contents for: Sexual Assault Law in Canada: Law, Legal Practice and Women's Activism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Law; Political science; Sexual violence; Criminology; Law reform; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.019632971852347313,"score_gpt":0.29327462812733174,"score_spread":0.27364165627498444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1857043480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839786,0.0031555926,0.000042402015,0.0040452527,0.000319942,0.00029824363,0.000009709429,0.000009383707,0.008140865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99760586,0.00065131066,0.000060268376,0.00030050616,0.0002617106,0.000018711618,7.8456765e-7,0.000009377977,0.0010914849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99664474,0.00021777049,0.00024135546,0.000120381854,0.0004931958,0.0022825743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990128,0.0003252586,0.00023430838,0.000052182866,0.00021793462,0.0001574723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026620617,0.00011782564,0.0002497346,0.000018703791,0.0006132716,0.000047564914,0.0001521277,0.00007435768,0.000010007095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052402675,0.000098280456,0.000025930647,0.00011689598,0.0001786099,0.001133653,0.00003552062,0.0008611656,7.5663763e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015239378,0.0001342497,0.012590193,0.000013894889,0.0002877669,0.0000021578592,0.016223371,0.000005673867,0.00044509245,0.9669039,0.0003099301,0.0029313616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022637567,0.0003428804,0.0060363733,0.000025569305,0.00007979592,0.00006106309,0.57906383,0.0000113155065,0.00019097012,0.009421688,0.40209064,0.00041214097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9590325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9574822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004848067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027706393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1859312411","doi":"","title":"Insidious Idolatry: Canada's Aboriginal Leaders and the Legal Whiplash","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Whiplash; Idolatry; Political science; Criminology; Public relations; Law; Psychology; Medicine; Poison control; Environmental health; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030269696485967106,"score_gpt":0.3256762590916458,"score_spread":0.2954065626056787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1859312411","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033711277,0.6638129,0.00000148688,0.028199129,0.0008313281,0.001246822,0.000029655908,0.000054648095,0.27211282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67570424,0.32197267,0.000011864585,0.0019351771,0.00017648021,0.000021461197,0.000005028445,0.0000059905465,0.00016707215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845624,0.0001510364,0.00034187137,0.0001994794,0.00052333996,0.00032801984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993448,0.00008296301,0.00017468107,0.00013122197,0.00012751689,0.0001388132],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055983214,0.00017419965,0.0004825701,0.000006351204,0.0012385475,0.000027242817,0.00018778844,0.00004417677,0.000012679158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045400007,0.000092498965,0.00008625234,0.00014006865,0.0027375524,0.00021258468,0.000055482386,0.0002265084,0.0000021203696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001334328,0.000015689615,0.00022805337,0.0012208798,0.000038035185,0.0000021788026,0.0032339047,4.995287e-8,5.663725e-7,0.9877392,0.0030901409,0.004417976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043448855,0.000016989125,0.0004480281,0.0011325487,0.000054313827,0.000006466819,0.00091944064,8.670281e-7,0.00000444919,0.00015196577,0.9966896,0.00014080503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8078839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8289454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9935995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001869182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025418628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1863832171","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4407","title":"Introduction: Re-Igniting Critical Race In Canadian Legal Spaces: Introduction To The Special Symposium Issue Of Contemporary Accounts Of Racialization In Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Racialization; Race (biology); Praxis; Scholarship; Critical race theory; Sociology; Gender studies; Media studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0251121704079767,"score_gpt":0.3101698702645446,"score_spread":0.2850576998565679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1863832171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7284146,0.0001281752,0.000018259198,0.24637094,0.0027873411,0.001604762,0.00003480288,0.000011657869,0.02062947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99153554,0.000018066325,0.0001230098,0.00041803485,0.0073654517,0.000040337174,0.0000046740997,0.00001066649,0.00048423608],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797493,0.00025050866,0.00055482023,0.00028609176,0.0005441918,0.00038948035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998726,0.00023092136,0.00018303633,0.00017977854,0.0005045313,0.00017570797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006478873,0.00013226744,0.00033914222,0.00018179015,0.00019973863,0.000095383795,0.0004460323,0.00008135556,0.0005867996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028460564,0.000117179654,0.00003052696,0.00086171646,0.00020386103,0.00085685187,0.000102026235,0.00017652364,0.000014169859],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046820127,0.00028127083,0.15982401,0.0010564917,0.00012858874,0.000023742841,0.1710855,0.014485753,0.0065773902,0.0152180595,0.6271643,0.0036866893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080733234,0.0001465958,0.23998997,0.0003811948,0.0001402491,0.0000014723441,0.22980475,0.00028431686,0.0063049244,0.00010178108,0.5213388,0.0006985698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99675995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26312092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008565398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014991869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6425044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1866183247","doi":"10.29173/cmplct8843","title":"Compliance or Complicity?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Complicity An International Journal of Complexity and Education","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Compliance (psychology); Business; Psychology; Political science; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.16520285183106206,"score_gpt":0.43230392855965133,"score_spread":0.2671010767285893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1866183247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816678,0.000050038456,0.00054222276,0.007555879,0.0025058468,0.00014699917,0.000015408117,0.000029729687,0.007486047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879471,0.00015986068,0.008556722,0.00087064813,0.0017555753,0.000004444431,0.00001444835,0.000006941928,0.0006842779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852246,0.00014763813,0.00040040704,0.00016093766,0.00057294045,0.00019561585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975626,0.00017057401,0.00039987746,0.00011965982,0.0014945338,0.00025279273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006024833,0.00012753911,0.00023429855,0.000099771336,0.0007498012,0.00028458558,0.000724926,0.00008241993,0.0004312267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004578109,0.000105732855,0.000078025776,0.00011565094,0.00079354807,0.00095208664,0.00008155066,0.00041822117,0.000015478256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046570037,0.0017202938,0.05628552,0.000040329644,0.00023126321,0.0000052719765,0.02590068,0.0000126813775,0.008173273,0.8414203,0.005835328,0.059909374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010590295,0.00026814383,0.6120939,0.00014640254,0.000045731005,0.00016510405,0.014591889,0.00030651846,0.00094946474,0.054336194,0.31548345,0.00055415696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027243057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045676283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7870841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001320275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029655793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5766941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1868345552","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2000.tb00553.x","title":"THE SECOND ANNUAL MEYER ELKIN ADDRESS","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Honor; Queen (butterfly); Conciliation; Wright; Law; Management; Sociology; Library science; Political science; History; Art history","score_opus":0.03615540671168817,"score_gpt":0.3405818266283443,"score_spread":0.30442641991665614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1868345552","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014602433,0.62308353,6.43936e-7,0.034164287,0.00047630625,0.0010863693,0.000057020636,0.00012907569,0.32640037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035679154,0.814862,0.00007119812,0.008923422,0.00073773,0.00015920926,0.0000059760932,0.000018409906,0.1395429],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980789,0.00043322527,0.00029650118,0.00022265929,0.00052550767,0.0004432004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910796,0.00029608724,0.00008323398,0.00022146093,0.00017423883,0.00011701814],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012169698,0.00015531738,0.0003107119,0.000006177472,0.0016026424,0.00009088267,0.00048564532,0.00007498052,0.0042614606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025484912,0.000089524176,0.00016470025,0.00024141089,0.0003899632,0.00019399068,0.000047556576,0.0002128034,0.0014303607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034798063,0.00001887565,0.00011149885,0.00015496864,0.000049183924,0.0000042628703,0.0043843715,2.9004727e-7,0.0000051682878,0.0014821431,0.8055025,0.1882833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073138806,0.000010583303,0.0062875138,0.00042294612,0.000032499935,4.913264e-7,0.001885526,5.6268556e-7,0.0000013935208,0.00007747221,0.9910617,0.00014615833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011473813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027730495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1917785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117584386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006873812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1874599610","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-0208.2011.00309.x","title":"Wife‐Abuse in Eighteenth‐Century France – By Mary Trouille","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Citation; History; Classics; Art history; Library science; Philosophy; Theology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05253720827175517,"score_gpt":0.3309042183520501,"score_spread":0.2783670100802949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1874599610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.506377,0.46248356,0.000055863446,0.0037994268,0.011441284,0.002291162,0.0001552747,0.00024026718,0.013156187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3959826,0.5967041,0.0018861382,0.0006618563,0.0015378856,0.00022409024,0.00001456071,0.000069186244,0.0029195764],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99524087,0.0005181719,0.0010676327,0.0006338772,0.0010627571,0.00147667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757826,0.0005720178,0.00061477564,0.0002672978,0.00057080976,0.00039683678],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015448859,0.00058125023,0.0009906003,0.00018989379,0.0030434218,0.00015526863,0.00080097315,0.00027156965,0.0002725031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071427424,0.00043740106,0.0005323374,0.0005659267,0.00090837135,0.0010525686,0.00019620323,0.0007303871,0.00007612513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077835534,0.0015492651,0.08134831,0.0002116095,0.0019146994,0.00013373281,0.20106274,0.0000042829533,0.00028350094,0.0072254264,0.69552773,0.009960361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002191713,0.00022122728,0.0139164515,0.00022902644,0.00015111045,0.000008486695,0.05669255,0.0000051862257,0.00013658045,0.00043180474,0.92531943,0.0006964403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068031834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006056503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2297917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008685918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008514271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1875405869","doi":"10.1163/15685349-12341305","title":"Richard Billingham and the Oxford Obligationes Texts: Restrictions on positio","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vivarium","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); History; Computer science","score_opus":0.04810025478749757,"score_gpt":0.3110074338910977,"score_spread":0.2629071791036001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1875405869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4673849,0.0017502025,0.00028048691,0.18966717,0.002095815,0.0012896705,0.000024719344,0.00041249808,0.33709455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99504536,0.00034452908,0.00020680927,0.00056531397,0.0004959521,0.000040041523,0.000002434437,0.0000055111027,0.0032940411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990132,0.00018352552,0.0001251994,0.00014908271,0.0003374515,0.00019154188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992651,0.00028801116,0.000061868035,0.000100154524,0.00018065312,0.00010423267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050172926,0.00008494231,0.000114008566,0.000029879955,0.0012169331,0.00013695782,0.00012958996,0.00006261092,0.000015528683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006978739,0.000048974816,0.00004074839,0.00030340574,0.0004975166,0.00015144484,0.000048985086,0.00011998252,0.000053531603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016114347,0.00013143345,0.010767726,0.000009237145,0.00013571086,0.000004282986,0.16433024,0.00015707329,0.00008873614,0.7684213,0.05298138,0.0028117544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020506352,0.00014034586,0.06004998,0.00003301088,0.0000926506,0.0000020888408,0.04069204,0.00019037467,0.00009659937,0.030289855,0.8660003,0.00036211798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007877766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006820577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8130189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011236484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046999146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W188382782","doi":"","title":"La médiation familiale","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024921715977329874,"score_gpt":0.3239175080618043,"score_spread":0.2989957920844744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W188382782","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4324235,0.0015085826,0.0000043661425,0.0010609147,0.0012243601,0.00033604086,0.000013358229,0.000098552206,0.56333035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6016665,0.0046104193,0.0002706378,0.00015630783,0.00064025377,0.000051276686,0.00022516002,0.000019212686,0.39236024],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997738,0.00046498096,0.00036644857,0.0003971825,0.0006083811,0.00042499334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908507,0.0003229082,0.00018402761,0.00011115682,0.00016759073,0.00012924643],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003223665,0.00032074947,0.0003612663,0.000038618335,0.0012167973,0.00012037804,0.00026222176,0.00071894075,0.007107709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001675719,0.0002781599,0.00023674405,0.0003892896,0.00039278198,0.0003062791,0.000018479335,0.00036161114,0.0029392303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118089505,0.00036219694,0.005958946,0.00026459768,0.0003745666,0.000014919227,0.42695454,0.00012905692,0.00035711736,0.15367742,0.025616566,0.386172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024585088,0.00003374189,0.09341324,0.00009657721,0.00013214258,3.6885797e-7,0.10482657,0.000080186066,0.00012949179,0.00053707283,0.7999789,0.0005258539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06514062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041020423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7743623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004911191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023304873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1892109340","doi":"10.22230/cjnser.2012v3n1a106","title":"Funding Charities Through Tax Law: When Should a Donation Qualify for Donation Incentives?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of nonprofit and social economy research","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Donation; Incentive; Gift tax; Statutory law; Income tax; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Humanities; Welfare economics; Economics; Tax credit; Philosophy; Direct tax","score_opus":0.3301997195044747,"score_gpt":0.44471219101954734,"score_spread":0.11451247151507266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1892109340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7335984,0.0060764044,0.00030544383,0.10080729,0.0014530269,0.0018883082,0.00011892837,0.000023736593,0.15572844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99536175,0.00011389019,0.00031181396,0.00027532116,0.0023395543,0.000037949154,0.000006356518,0.000010503798,0.0015428541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981169,0.00035705077,0.00030639392,0.00012229107,0.00032208767,0.0007752571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981063,0.00040048265,0.00017472071,0.000037328005,0.0008991106,0.0003820616],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004156879,0.00009922471,0.00023777576,0.00014045219,0.003779962,0.0003687927,0.00021887587,0.00017715595,0.00014922967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004396672,0.00009379423,0.00010351794,0.0001337082,0.00092895725,0.0016194986,0.000027304979,0.00036637785,0.000006588139],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020223755,0.000013337038,0.017002255,0.00004741395,0.00007864487,0.000001499936,0.2758335,3.1644302e-7,0.000016211523,0.6957532,0.0081493305,0.0030840973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005242972,0.0000677708,0.0057911393,0.000035320354,0.000019612047,0.0000015800913,0.15585858,0.000006498423,0.000045110177,0.03801558,0.79944515,0.0001893712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09497644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17772904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7912958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011196982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072725496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893559805","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004422","title":"The Cultural Limits of Legal Tolerance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Multiculturalism; Constitutionalism; Dialogic; Law; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Legal culture; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Political science; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.046076258290730955,"score_gpt":0.3158658241002884,"score_spread":0.26978956580955743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893559805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94155157,0.009114946,0.000006735119,0.010289093,0.0011855168,0.00015534005,0.000009310085,0.000009054365,0.037678443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99597794,0.0013505913,0.00020484373,0.00026819302,0.0004795989,0.00000196323,1.6596823e-7,0.000006063181,0.001710637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982906,0.00016452876,0.0004244816,0.000105747094,0.00053930207,0.00047531244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980021,0.00022294896,0.00034900566,0.00011977186,0.00078910927,0.00051702367],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055826554,0.0001185142,0.00024984629,0.000026957934,0.002546123,0.00010228974,0.000742177,0.00007535453,0.000043505803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058147433,0.000075500524,0.00016597667,0.00022687708,0.002304679,0.00058019924,0.0000137055395,0.00030056955,0.000013084628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100204525,0.00006476587,0.052460987,0.000042930154,0.00031665547,0.0012030323,0.22236326,0.00026294458,0.0014344647,0.633433,0.08086981,0.007447979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022631277,0.000080221034,0.030424215,0.00010638245,0.000022284545,0.00009260758,0.0052828128,0.000002709732,0.0006736491,0.0002969824,0.9626186,0.00017324548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15072118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45247287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8817488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002798653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011231928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1894175811","doi":"","title":"Making Sense of Aboriginal and Treaty Rights","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Treaty; Fundamental rights; Political science; Indigenous; Constitution; Fiduciary; Common law; Supreme court; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.031013383303550097,"score_gpt":0.3614882278066499,"score_spread":0.33047484450309983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1894175811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69591826,0.00010306094,0.0000013549057,0.00056402176,0.000023161427,0.000058642985,0.0000012520095,0.000027858083,0.3033024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98539835,0.00016775024,0.00066650455,0.000041696618,0.0000839403,0.0000016971269,2.0921695e-7,0.0000015255331,0.013638313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994687,0.000050485425,0.00008406998,0.000096384814,0.00015765842,0.00014269135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998075,0.000058609006,0.000021857903,0.000038569342,0.000035483274,0.000038018432],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001073299,0.000053460986,0.000101829995,0.000008356976,0.00040917363,0.000020266536,0.00003601446,0.00003589957,0.0015365478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010482017,0.000034787725,0.00002621097,0.000080273276,0.0002807111,0.00009610239,0.0000055907826,0.000033553442,0.000026326163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014082147,0.00023412143,0.06701507,0.000052694097,0.00022143882,0.00006134444,0.34131572,0.000014026192,0.0006240528,0.439361,0.0110121695,0.13994753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037804295,0.00003847429,0.07115874,0.00002704954,0.000031225634,0.0000021080757,0.005867138,0.000024663288,0.0003310953,0.0022510786,0.91968924,0.00020116114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020800162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007576489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90867704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000323612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011490153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1897283657","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2003.tb00883.x","title":"FAMILY/CHILD JUDICIAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION (JDR)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Family court; Dispute resolution; Law; Welfare; Political science; Family law; Alternative dispute resolution; Resolution (logic); Best interests; Psychology; Sociology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.04793670436161205,"score_gpt":0.3351885406590122,"score_spread":0.28725183629740014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1897283657","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039979517,0.5580346,0.00017206935,0.016820788,0.0015484608,0.0014930471,0.000019084904,0.00025632125,0.41765767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1418539,0.8391769,0.0015631245,0.012590306,0.0010991793,0.00017908597,0.000021434787,0.000039604016,0.0034764796],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970091,0.0007630679,0.00045514922,0.00038964095,0.0007780678,0.00060496235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899745,0.00013503701,0.00018636079,0.0002574396,0.00022945303,0.0001942848],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015901207,0.00024277583,0.0005332448,0.000027241846,0.001517669,0.00006887943,0.0003268447,0.00014399523,0.00010969044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013783776,0.00019575944,0.0002588038,0.0005379042,0.00035235815,0.00024717973,0.000062214815,0.0003155875,0.00052074186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010532261,0.00017707872,0.0017762562,0.0008537016,0.00015754285,0.000022812392,0.0047476836,0.000005873558,0.000105957406,0.089382984,0.8512679,0.051491678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015529907,0.00002204631,0.012979027,0.0014652612,0.0000990015,0.0000010277606,0.0007507867,0.0000029332764,0.000002062502,0.00028920788,0.9839579,0.00027547654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038152027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008958123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41418117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033845517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012561867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1901499918","doi":"10.3138/topia.30-31.165","title":"Settling Accounts: On The Subject of Economic Confessions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confessional; Confession (law); Capitalism; Subject (documents); Narrative; Context (archaeology); Social order; Position (finance); Sociology; Relation (database); Order (exchange); Political economy; Aesthetics; Political science; Economics; History; Law; Literature; Finance; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.0696324753936835,"score_gpt":0.3462145803250806,"score_spread":0.2765821049313971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1901499918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94381005,0.0017760143,8.478401e-7,0.0299987,0.0010884133,0.0001453459,0.00001237709,0.000007564976,0.023160718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99721175,0.0005687094,0.000040598832,0.00044263114,0.00069618836,0.0000035503217,3.8680184e-7,0.000005239966,0.0010309331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868435,0.0002529592,0.00038205492,0.000098447155,0.00024713692,0.0003350284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832034,0.0005649915,0.000361346,0.00008782753,0.00046345394,0.00020205368],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008939842,0.00013680781,0.00036665914,0.000049606704,0.0014994073,0.00007357898,0.0003654329,0.000058826256,0.00014864864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016666991,0.00007054453,0.00016753579,0.00009814417,0.00077381346,0.0002145753,0.000024231727,0.00022434714,0.000025192076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005215079,0.000031587384,0.032555293,0.000055232784,0.001581786,0.00001982512,0.37617177,0.0005276384,0.00026481663,0.4510242,0.12873724,0.0089784665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000517058,0.00019005446,0.025505612,0.00036221303,0.0001237879,0.0000068918953,0.2496069,0.000008118985,0.00032613543,0.003089244,0.7199325,0.0003314936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042907353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2781249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5911952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048185576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030571825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1902148784","doi":"10.1017/cha.2015.6","title":"Should Governments be Above the Law? The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal on First Nations Child Welfare","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Children Australia","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Assembly of First Nations; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Statute; Harm; Human rights; Welfare; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Child protection; International human rights law; Public administration","score_opus":0.09487384469426566,"score_gpt":0.3485617653913811,"score_spread":0.25368792069711543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1902148784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30962846,0.00007708397,2.1501434e-7,0.2494396,0.00085853727,0.0014448325,0.0005095796,0.00010232437,0.43793938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937654,0.000004443876,0.0000063353755,0.00054274104,0.00069788523,0.00004673528,0.00005487623,0.000010522087,0.004871049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977702,0.00018302823,0.00020302061,0.00027228432,0.0010048092,0.00056663953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990493,0.00008972023,0.00010436798,0.0002764111,0.00011737703,0.00036282555],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047653777,0.00021109676,0.00015870537,0.000026978963,0.026614048,0.00032194302,0.00075676676,0.00015935386,0.0004702717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018703373,0.00011264285,0.00012015387,0.0002987058,0.0008304948,0.00017771489,0.00006253376,0.00044873427,0.00019100508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056770127,0.000064815395,0.018366976,0.0000017451791,0.00016482417,0.0000034279913,0.022111,0.000041464566,2.2209313e-7,0.88506913,0.07415072,0.000019985811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029397343,0.00002921653,0.2933853,0.000015624475,0.000040304643,0.0000012133436,0.0022209263,4.934351e-7,0.000018486639,0.0002891649,0.7035327,0.0001725782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90181506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99712783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012104415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003072532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9746532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1904965409","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1164","title":"Supreme Court of Canada Constitutional Cases 2007: Defining Access to Justice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Economic Justice; Law; Dissent; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.09791640408892952,"score_gpt":0.3577640589548148,"score_spread":0.25984765486588524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1904965409","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037911527,0.38000503,0.00024976413,0.08705637,0.00574715,0.005820578,0.0009867576,0.0003672104,0.4818556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93497044,0.051908143,0.00095619046,0.010268289,0.00048421847,0.00010872972,0.00003261159,0.000018479761,0.0012528823],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970297,0.0002637267,0.0005963456,0.0003520551,0.001157731,0.0006003951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977882,0.00059675355,0.00022093333,0.00023947064,0.0008136249,0.00034105324],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007913865,0.00024460757,0.0006781429,0.000020835707,0.00173235,0.000042285883,0.0006255859,0.00007589522,0.0011830666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002588338,0.00020826228,0.0001462036,0.0004110464,0.0013259853,0.0003795202,0.00019404024,0.00018235354,0.00006880262],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017255748,0.00006867049,0.0047861333,0.0015651543,0.00013109957,0.00013054577,0.0013718458,0.00006989651,0.000016852851,0.25372955,0.7377819,0.00033111745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016074568,0.000021854743,0.0016367218,0.0015296477,0.00019699956,0.00002813259,0.00042246084,0.0000022258582,0.000027661856,0.00004373146,0.9956272,0.00030261627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6190864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69444096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8970589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005458338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018163825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1906128875","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1227","title":"Canadian Federalism and the Principle of Subsidiarity: Should We Open Pandora's Box?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Federalism; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Cooperative federalism; Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Sociology; European union; Economics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14454690059098801,"score_gpt":0.36397738416182734,"score_spread":0.21943048357083933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1906128875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01305671,0.36360267,0.0000037948264,0.16110618,0.0005229742,0.006871611,0.00007278058,0.00007133345,0.45469195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7665686,0.22556771,0.00030416466,0.005038386,0.00009363193,0.00014665815,0.0000046002274,0.0000137634215,0.0022624983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982189,0.0005238503,0.00033458095,0.00022441619,0.00032752575,0.00037071476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990217,0.00013481593,0.00014805023,0.00025491152,0.00021231918,0.00022821283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021186578,0.00015213172,0.0005661745,0.000010632225,0.0011262902,0.00011134917,0.0007058289,0.00008241532,0.0007213435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000385947,0.000089409536,0.00011390287,0.00016804688,0.00092387426,0.00026772544,0.00025723135,0.00016320945,0.00003266489],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015687025,0.000023169516,0.0028098302,0.00048721154,0.000098695215,0.0000046056325,0.012190454,2.6902976e-8,0.0000023988057,0.97489506,0.0073532895,0.002119601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003884438,0.00001195313,0.0013332266,0.0007050446,0.00010925883,0.0000010412227,0.0005426641,7.696835e-7,0.000017067388,0.0029638824,0.99377817,0.00014846008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.843593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.886089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9864249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000141786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018218295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86626273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1910688488","doi":"","title":"A Dangerous Step Backwards: The Implications of Conditional Permanent Resident Status for Sponsored Immigrant Women in Abusive Relationships","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Context (archaeology); Domestic violence; Government (linguistics); Residence; Immigration law; Law; Political science; Criminology; Jurisprudence; Institution; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Geography","score_opus":0.07167891146118106,"score_gpt":0.35851966959434095,"score_spread":0.2868407581331599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1910688488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97765535,0.009619712,0.000083818544,0.010660983,0.00039079736,0.0007081137,0.00015367291,0.000012386416,0.00071515044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99604875,0.0022491815,0.00064477633,0.00011369673,0.00042512376,0.00014118152,0.000005887873,0.0000116597375,0.00035973324],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972855,0.0005364999,0.00078703626,0.00012382535,0.0006087301,0.00065842253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99596745,0.0019925337,0.00073987164,0.000120316,0.0010084191,0.00017141187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003145533,0.00016545737,0.0004911332,0.000110229106,0.0011773012,0.00004174442,0.0002797299,0.000070133465,0.000021242524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030964818,0.000105573505,0.00019771756,0.00033217648,0.0007087349,0.0005194762,0.000088993664,0.0003276526,0.0000048246543],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034753836,0.0003405401,0.12768012,0.00007144128,0.00096283347,0.000006229834,0.81610346,0.00019227799,0.00028832964,0.040749885,0.012527986,0.0007293285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073774793,0.00011008775,0.5927197,0.00006115391,0.00009468619,0.000009319747,0.33221546,0.0000016218837,0.000024850899,0.0017382681,0.07215015,0.00013697079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014985652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041685095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48388803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010351493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021142692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9054968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1910847956","doi":"10.7202/001475ar","title":"Le recours précoce à la ligature des trompes au Québec : des suites indésirables?","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Sociologie et sociétés","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.3352341570036728,"score_gpt":0.4596854724304865,"score_spread":0.1244513154268137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1910847956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.618658,0.12807833,0.000015354182,0.13258213,0.00239807,0.0005946842,0.00007913576,0.0005077717,0.11708651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91678804,0.041202158,0.0015635693,0.001343923,0.0010513936,0.000118207805,0.000014234779,0.000068987276,0.037849505],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99324846,0.002685251,0.0006410813,0.0008810885,0.00061469583,0.0019294474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936267,0.004781122,0.00044149108,0.0003366552,0.00041698467,0.00039704406],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021143241,0.000733392,0.0009776687,0.00005354934,0.0055033523,0.0002790602,0.0009650083,0.0016087783,0.0023886487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005077345,0.0006539069,0.0007415165,0.00055895286,0.014118247,0.0011661673,0.00038172925,0.0016384473,0.0005032861],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027884347,0.00089739007,0.08139902,0.00038667358,0.0011155899,0.000061285005,0.62301,0.0000737616,0.0003125622,0.071043454,0.06157852,0.16009389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019516837,0.00046790883,0.13426264,0.0007227269,0.0004993805,0.000018232655,0.44425324,0.000050445993,0.00031638503,0.12611279,0.28893125,0.0024133148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18169364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.109708264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028566842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013118224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1913254193","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1248","title":"Stare Decisis and Constitutional Supremacy: Will Our Charter Past Become an Obstacle to Our Charter Future?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Law; Constitution; Doctrine; Political science; Legislature; Common law","score_opus":0.05136210201716434,"score_gpt":0.351625516492381,"score_spread":0.30026341447521665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1913254193","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14398511,0.35972425,0.00034632426,0.46328348,0.008117716,0.008268296,0.0009135573,0.0007616558,0.014599607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973481,0.013940313,0.00072266004,0.007832071,0.0033028813,0.00014887535,0.000043557564,0.000021880238,0.00050676754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706566,0.0003173746,0.00047600703,0.0004571825,0.00082172715,0.000862058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983407,0.000057305908,0.00013283166,0.0003308269,0.0003892047,0.00074909395],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011233793,0.00034320005,0.0006602988,0.000031121086,0.0011927186,0.00015651404,0.0003788818,0.00013315857,0.00043628117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018118639,0.00026360492,0.00018189328,0.0002515335,0.0004244291,0.0014168326,0.00016483353,0.00022295224,0.0004331803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056620058,0.0006754089,0.085996754,0.0019834188,0.0005363856,0.00002436158,0.04565107,0.0000013930211,0.0002628801,0.55140126,0.28092265,0.03248779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023568147,0.00003799196,0.010664198,0.0006048705,0.00011380911,0.000007776278,0.0058492585,6.3836455e-7,0.000007225165,0.0001293421,0.9819251,0.0004241204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005889562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017896737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8294959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023592408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006676045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W19147253","doi":"","title":"Physicians and the Ontario Human Rights Code","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Courage; Elite; Law; Politics; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Political science; Conscience; Sociology","score_opus":0.02557630002152114,"score_gpt":0.30667202054363907,"score_spread":0.28109572052211795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W19147253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57187545,0.000053165204,0.00000440566,0.014268139,0.00005041378,0.00017584185,3.9169623e-7,0.00005338646,0.41351882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9570716,0.0000069979014,0.000093484545,0.0007560949,0.00014336857,0.0000034426682,4.0353697e-7,0.000001049972,0.04192353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994109,0.00006960255,0.000071664435,0.000103030514,0.00017636555,0.00016842072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99979144,0.000059732578,0.000027483735,0.000057825007,0.00003360874,0.000029894343],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018063272,0.000060775954,0.00010666614,0.000004307687,0.0023128286,0.000076165474,0.00011357588,0.000029772906,0.00014760792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013349325,0.00003003829,0.000040018076,0.000049735878,0.0005247106,0.00009852774,0.000017475597,0.00008092345,0.000020022071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075467647,0.000029416738,0.001308534,5.0253914e-7,0.000022200082,0.0000010432819,0.22146429,5.761552e-7,0.000044549055,0.7665918,0.008723117,0.0018064553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008977916,0.000036777015,0.17312637,0.000009515521,0.000031796942,1.9477548e-7,0.008382128,0.0000040425443,0.00008262793,0.059165705,0.75807446,0.00018860883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51397324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9338113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7493513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009898694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000075829826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1921973096","doi":"10.21991/c9sm1p","title":"\"A CONSTITUTIONAL CONFERENCE ... SHALL BE CONVENED ...\": LIVING WITH CONSTITUTIONAL PROMISES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional law; Constitutional review; Constitutional economics; Political science; Constitutional interpretation; Law; Constitution","score_opus":0.06731187242642653,"score_gpt":0.28561022802357255,"score_spread":0.21829835559714603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1921973096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013745634,0.0014976733,0.12960413,0.012467042,0.0036864409,0.0032758662,0.0012074073,0.0013581314,0.83315766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988101,0.00023848744,0.007375946,0.0018554529,0.00040758596,0.00048726017,0.00018849097,0.000017588485,0.0013281998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931605,0.00038571467,0.0011600275,0.0013563602,0.0019290039,0.0020083797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99507487,0.00073621457,0.00058414397,0.00053852296,0.00213209,0.00093417603],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010254253,0.0009452387,0.0009372179,0.00025887872,0.0078071924,0.0003722311,0.0010526055,0.0005756958,0.0048115375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019321836,0.00083103956,0.00043238592,0.00083918165,0.10841673,0.0024276164,0.0004156636,0.0007906648,0.0005194382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016122119,0.0004346741,0.061256744,0.00003843982,0.0004008981,0.00009511237,0.0022816006,0.00012870194,0.00010400498,0.9315207,0.003279175,0.00029875583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0075261067,0.00056428945,0.013417044,0.002239716,0.00078452344,0.0012682233,0.05956457,0.00035258356,0.0008004485,0.03467578,0.87378114,0.0050255414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018134161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97435534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011153049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007554704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924668998","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2035134","title":"Putting the Legal Treatise in its Place","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.019357911207956744,"score_gpt":0.30636643105923583,"score_spread":0.28700851985127906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1924668998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9404105,0.018367093,0.000036891717,0.019392705,0.00045965682,0.0002652651,7.984863e-7,0.000041628624,0.021025473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98726356,0.0039086887,0.00003918392,0.00009615346,0.0011751874,0.0000088488805,2.743812e-7,0.000008775082,0.0074993414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961754,0.0003853836,0.00020094228,0.00009829904,0.0003890102,0.0027509858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947727,0.00018697356,0.00011796894,0.000060141403,0.000059784958,0.0000978601],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003979186,0.00011336859,0.00013780885,0.00003165747,0.0013767051,0.0001059738,0.0003005949,0.0000673074,0.00005758517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005167455,0.00006963236,0.00008390126,0.00025550387,0.0001201783,0.0006212839,0.000042138123,0.001361631,0.00006793844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029926328,0.00014063239,0.07361441,0.000004470177,0.00016839606,0.000004754614,0.081260055,0.000042766627,0.00020207316,0.77481127,0.001029919,0.06869133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024075357,0.00023626756,0.1430354,0.0000985848,0.00014326826,0.00023947738,0.3584514,0.00007059055,0.00013377127,0.045057055,0.44930658,0.00082008104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041179126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04823792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7297542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002086812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006728871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1925438246","doi":"10.5508/jhs.2009.v9.r20","title":"Review of S. Olyan, Disability in the Hebrew Bible","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hebrew Scriptures","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hebrew Bible; Philosophy; Theology; Literature; Art; Biblical studies","score_opus":0.03382345115884832,"score_gpt":0.3579066613624408,"score_spread":0.3240832102035925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1925438246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4726654,0.46680117,0.0000027043418,0.049907766,0.0016995652,0.000528159,0.000008058906,0.00001409847,0.008373096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9058872,0.02774765,0.0008453662,0.064313464,0.0011164225,0.00000972527,8.727269e-7,0.000010381139,0.00006891252],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977012,0.0004741268,0.0006702868,0.000114839175,0.0007742642,0.00026528118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998545,0.00031691842,0.000494329,0.00020169924,0.00035290924,0.00008916035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038855323,0.00012463192,0.00043386657,0.000047435224,0.00026905045,0.000055039225,0.000737125,0.00009493179,0.0004910282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022347462,0.000064958906,0.0002702804,0.0005869661,0.00075637695,0.00035611197,0.000053352607,0.0006894892,0.000010236668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027663888,0.0003237483,0.038832266,0.00095236965,0.00006621375,0.000012056222,0.017467963,0.0000010432411,0.001240838,0.0035943573,0.9302192,0.007262282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001979939,0.000050108945,0.10096624,0.0008169679,0.000046343983,0.000011819312,0.005195564,3.0402006e-7,0.00010340606,0.0013434944,0.89117676,0.00009101791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037752667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069728647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4390535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007187785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000106358915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57070994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1926811835","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1290","title":"The Law of the Land: New Jurisprudence on Aboriginal Title","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Indigenous; Political science; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Milestone; Denial; Indigenous rights; Common law; Legal history; Sociology; Human rights; History","score_opus":0.028217852532724925,"score_gpt":0.3481949345341023,"score_spread":0.31997708200137737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1926811835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036144734,0.041935835,0.0000054393563,0.034421775,0.00065146456,0.00043275533,0.0000035486694,0.000033701243,0.922154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79756397,0.15182701,0.00022412448,0.010665955,0.0015641575,0.000040162802,0.000001982254,0.00002415272,0.0380885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920654,0.00015474646,0.00011465135,0.0000822484,0.00030803395,0.00013374937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995098,0.00014730323,0.000066941655,0.00017643765,0.00006214208,0.000037366866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005019294,0.00005971587,0.00012882287,0.0000013530353,0.00047515397,0.000022723689,0.0003284914,0.000025162768,0.00025407667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013471502,0.000027076492,0.00008112633,0.00008073438,0.00030345,0.000035317767,0.000027068156,0.00008621258,0.00037369048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.701668e-7,0.000004936377,0.00012478104,0.0000563874,0.0000078003195,6.781763e-8,0.00019721777,1.7867639e-7,0.00000240083,0.924418,0.071924165,0.003263298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028733493,0.000007647747,0.0002695789,0.00039352072,0.000018706922,9.227943e-8,0.000013763706,5.719627e-7,0.000016860231,0.0011714464,0.99803793,0.000041158386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058683874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052044527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9261137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003230652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051135445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88712853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1934338030","doi":"10.7202/1120172ar","title":"(Re)Producing Nation: Race, Gender, Sexuality, The Sovereign and the Living Constitution","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subordination (linguistics); Constitution; Race (biology); Political science; Identity (music); Jurisprudence; Human sexuality; Sovereignty; Sociology; Ethnology; Law; Humanities; Gender studies; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.10250674480207539,"score_gpt":0.4008193229287437,"score_spread":0.29831257812666834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1934338030","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12715001,0.040632293,0.0006059712,0.14880335,0.01947373,0.003705594,0.000057501984,0.0005733448,0.6589982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901004,0.0032109541,0.00032294416,0.0017890673,0.0039941454,0.0000957335,0.0000026190098,0.000011247942,0.00047291478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963343,0.0010940442,0.00044790984,0.0005491407,0.00086974096,0.0007048303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99467754,0.0042873183,0.00012150238,0.00018793468,0.0006289403,0.0000967604],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032407527,0.00029953814,0.00047860388,0.000021618242,0.008117217,0.00030298278,0.00042181576,0.00027169636,0.000060388782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019542286,0.00016766966,0.00012534353,0.00044624286,0.008350323,0.00037953895,0.0004934379,0.0010621047,0.000016890992],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015524358,0.000043976273,0.0019993072,0.00011869952,0.00012380896,0.000007786392,0.3075719,0.0000019848717,0.000035673558,0.68091476,0.0087102065,0.00045635144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094737863,0.000016621048,0.027304891,0.00006796299,0.0008064359,0.000012922091,0.8527337,0.000035816032,0.000009775889,0.027246235,0.090257086,0.0005612155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021848415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009074371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8629504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018518318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007877285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1935771292","doi":"","title":"Introduction: la fin de Oakes?","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Normative; Democracy; Political science; Meaning (existential); Constitutional law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.0540344915262779,"score_gpt":0.38308039229326224,"score_spread":0.32904590076698437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1935771292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8233461,0.0020071259,0.0000064224014,0.15406623,0.00073455943,0.0005146013,0.00026149792,0.000017764973,0.019045727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748718,0.015650608,0.002681991,0.0010731793,0.0033735137,0.000011578873,0.00000703296,0.000022725233,0.0023075766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98956186,0.0005969267,0.0016585152,0.0017028163,0.0007683205,0.0057115476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98800784,0.0018094373,0.00039484235,0.0006974655,0.0012700837,0.007820306],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015549065,0.00054954295,0.0012311707,0.0007550678,0.001962916,0.0011414391,0.001844206,0.0004968373,0.0006960316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0104175955,0.00051398505,0.00027922427,0.0015635798,0.036221273,0.002606551,0.00096325856,0.0014571334,0.0001035584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007271158,0.00036908375,0.004157504,0.00005902047,0.00002990771,0.0000038787052,0.00037332592,0.000087866785,0.00047627068,0.98863,0.00066238915,0.0050780415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022830332,0.0021070724,0.20922664,0.00026991818,0.00012676477,0.00011322962,0.008638111,0.010809206,0.003281846,0.5096969,0.25193962,0.0015076599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016453544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011032932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47893313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030571718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071248445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1938787646","doi":"","title":"Article: Of \"Passport Babies\" and \"Border Control\": The Case of Mavis Baker v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Immigration; State (computer science); Political science; Immigration policy; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Media studies; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.027677684449155474,"score_gpt":0.2998086573471514,"score_spread":0.2721309728979959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1938787646","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860872,0.0005380392,0.0000140636,0.0051549585,0.000024913126,0.00021429073,0.000010433555,0.000007111008,0.007948993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981426,0.00013235414,0.00013514863,0.000108232314,0.00002320156,0.000005685866,2.521022e-7,0.000002748087,0.0014497498],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992943,0.00009752006,0.00023928849,0.00009770874,0.00015214951,0.00011906978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931365,0.0002833177,0.00012550301,0.00007448828,0.00016531239,0.00003772031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003265953,0.000066936824,0.00018497258,0.000012553485,0.00018545223,0.000014191565,0.00004346766,0.000050573595,0.00031653815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017965927,0.000039108058,0.000036107285,0.00010389515,0.000814285,0.00006755075,0.000022705857,0.000040529605,9.0486077e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015163822,0.00029518042,0.49068618,0.0002521414,0.00057152036,0.000065051536,0.37968692,0.000008487552,0.013624586,0.06135341,0.018328896,0.034975976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004065487,0.000418869,0.6424612,0.00008584316,0.00047614868,0.00006262643,0.33385515,0.0020105354,0.006955086,0.002268194,0.0067772106,0.00056368136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055554807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004073749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15177497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010420558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000576252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8398262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1941541426","doi":"","title":"Challenging Legislative Infringements of the Inherent Aboriginal Right of Self-Government","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Parliament; Legislature; Law; Constitution; Political science; Corporate governance; Prima facie; Constitution of India; Legislative history; Public administration; Law and economics; Business; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.02047155980995342,"score_gpt":0.306697950037722,"score_spread":0.2862263902277686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1941541426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4332536,0.00018053612,0.000041900515,0.0005859216,0.0002651192,0.00036453566,0.000003135802,0.00002273054,0.5652825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99658525,0.00017053603,0.0005815333,0.00002052039,0.00002837214,0.000007890306,6.453652e-8,0.0000030007272,0.0026028522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986303,0.00014583321,0.00019259064,0.00010734812,0.00073763455,0.00018633329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954814,0.00006828614,0.00016227142,0.00009442644,0.00009309234,0.000033759672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031947397,0.00008240263,0.000141628,0.000006979073,0.00032568185,0.000009156113,0.00017554872,0.000034914377,0.00029383958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008233899,0.0000470992,0.00007365039,0.0001499293,0.00018932561,0.000100309335,0.000040530922,0.00006813504,0.0000038649114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009345761,0.00032264635,0.0788012,0.000047703394,0.0003326542,6.700876e-7,0.20955214,0.000051221377,0.0006128857,0.7087568,0.0009259631,0.0005867477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008710361,0.000079686506,0.11135056,0.00011161131,0.00008840491,1.7950634e-7,0.068994515,0.00002672765,0.020632556,0.0010450383,0.79648995,0.00030971217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016887861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011056102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.795564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025794547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004403913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32173374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1945132981","doi":"10.7202/1069353ar","title":"THE FINAL WORD: After the Residential School Apology: Why All Canadians Should Care about a Racial Equality Case Before the Canadian Human Rights Commission","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"First Peoples Child & Family Review An Interdisciplinary Journal Honouring the Voices Perspectives and Knowledges of First Peoples","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Racial equality; Human rights; Political science; Sociology; Law; Race (biology); Criminology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.0397160387539153,"score_gpt":0.35368350301027257,"score_spread":0.31396746425635724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1945132981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5528775,0.22685757,0.0000029662037,0.21525563,0.0005154993,0.0012355554,0.00013894554,0.00004326406,0.0030730502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97074306,0.02545313,0.000017760129,0.0006249777,0.0028054994,0.00010274458,0.000008636234,0.000034375804,0.00020980851],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954665,0.0014427019,0.0009075529,0.0006031687,0.0006256862,0.0009544228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636364,0.0009586903,0.00065332535,0.0005799207,0.000611356,0.00083307386],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017160476,0.0005676799,0.0007494829,0.00008733045,0.04287565,0.0009860806,0.0019945707,0.0001906756,0.00015404253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006320937,0.0002575016,0.0006012059,0.00044406348,0.0026299288,0.00055642397,0.0009555544,0.0015501832,0.000012552147],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017037247,0.00006761895,0.008843342,0.00061623735,0.00038714043,0.00012403703,0.97640175,0.000018108154,8.2125905e-7,0.001565112,0.011148994,0.0006564773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037755357,0.00032796495,0.15841739,0.0028130107,0.0005037983,0.00030955175,0.60952866,0.000022047812,0.0000010194416,0.00036518983,0.2269028,0.00043101024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3966648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60188323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072833523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040365566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1951952528","doi":"","title":"The Mythical Power of Myth? A Response to Professor Dauer","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Impartiality; Criticism; Law; Mediation; Jurisprudence; Power (physics); Viewpoints; Empathy; Political science; Discretion; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.024637198689653358,"score_gpt":0.3113668690754152,"score_spread":0.28672967038576186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1951952528","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14481243,0.03641388,0.0000052950227,0.45578846,0.00033593786,0.0030846999,0.00005688946,0.0001738109,0.3593286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60527444,0.14246868,0.0006286799,0.014336426,0.00014485657,0.000011060452,0.000004299008,0.000024966374,0.23710662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998178,0.00091268483,0.00013104605,0.00016472767,0.00035260466,0.00026095143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990463,0.00040948897,0.000048483136,0.00020136693,0.00016685938,0.00012746429],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010865919,0.00008902629,0.00022908651,0.000007810563,0.001238217,0.000017118144,0.0003946929,0.000053937572,0.0009951137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003739536,0.00006045776,0.00012976643,0.000358044,0.0006262281,0.0001148157,0.000088601126,0.0001346168,0.00036719596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018477495,0.00031858875,0.00034818013,0.00081363117,0.00035975134,0.000087220425,0.06428366,0.000003863503,0.0001483124,0.5557925,0.33376604,0.042230487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108325185,0.00003346025,0.0007616939,0.0003793065,0.000035675872,3.1905552e-7,0.002060234,1.0519583e-7,0.000006122903,0.000041079085,0.99648684,0.00008681941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014855274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014066008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6627208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017675484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000076120414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1953916609","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1072","title":"The Political Impact of the Charter","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Victory; Politics; Law; Section (typography); Political science; Government (linguistics); Bill of rights; Human rights","score_opus":0.044173219618805035,"score_gpt":0.37464218048969,"score_spread":0.33046896087088495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1953916609","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023692476,0.22514425,0.0000026931555,0.5061662,0.0005879495,0.0023251926,0.000035658213,0.00009618068,0.2419494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733443,0.022343477,0.000023260527,0.00274284,0.00041222753,0.000025867683,5.9559653e-7,0.0000064950527,0.0011009005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841714,0.00034007098,0.0002602255,0.0001154308,0.00043944997,0.00042770282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916923,0.00021118611,0.000091677335,0.0002576819,0.00017220798,0.00009803499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007029207,0.00010671268,0.00023906658,0.000002505082,0.0009518408,0.00003720799,0.00047136878,0.000042502812,0.00036270672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044699232,0.00004304273,0.00037573176,0.00013864962,0.0008750699,0.00011204858,0.000089059155,0.00013635517,0.000115328075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002504035,0.000035875648,0.002009094,0.00013612895,0.00009193739,2.4750946e-7,0.0015096468,4.4117e-7,0.00002827882,0.9455313,0.043826856,0.006827712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055823257,0.000011453676,0.00497532,0.00038618632,0.00005002287,6.1259243e-7,0.00023000414,0.000001815464,0.000018398054,0.00059704593,0.99359727,0.0000760675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054323557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005176066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9497704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002300596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007958428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82121325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1954752369","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1065","title":"“Thank God We’re Here”: Judicial Exclusivity in Charter Interpretation and Its Consequences","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Politics; Constitution; Parliament; Legislature; Interpretation (philosophy); Duty","score_opus":0.05347643224030228,"score_gpt":0.34916544021390894,"score_spread":0.29568900797360664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1954752369","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2017817,0.5483108,0.000032467797,0.20226754,0.0010458318,0.0036314968,0.000040056664,0.00022743805,0.042662635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8942016,0.10346552,0.00006455026,0.0019443511,0.00015038966,0.00006279236,0.0000036093477,0.0000073438355,0.00009987637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826133,0.00034143328,0.00035117514,0.0003078315,0.00039469032,0.0003435364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940395,0.0001078605,0.00013039586,0.0000988483,0.00015183573,0.00010713536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008742097,0.00017851812,0.00044600668,0.000018995965,0.00048590617,0.000065894834,0.00020052888,0.000094230454,0.0002464332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041430414,0.00014318556,0.00008859863,0.00022837217,0.00055151334,0.00047059119,0.000083374114,0.00019045518,0.00010117373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011471623,0.00047453435,0.0071697803,0.008097218,0.00030747202,0.0001732973,0.1546984,0.000020420428,0.0011252557,0.7613267,0.0048661684,0.061626043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019037372,0.00023296179,0.008346013,0.025635917,0.00031745018,0.000015350048,0.009104217,0.000024737392,0.00044147708,0.024466572,0.92800176,0.0015097948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008492311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052124005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9231356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002692058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009818965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99811023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1955827312","doi":"","title":"Formal Equality in Law, Moral Regulation in Practice: Courts Versus Policy Makers as Champions of Sexuality and Reproductive Rights in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Reproductive rights; Legislature; Supreme court; Family law; Legislation; Administrative law; Sociology; Reproductive health; Population","score_opus":0.04067937791811048,"score_gpt":0.34353778433583687,"score_spread":0.3028584064177264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1955827312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98630106,0.00031978407,0.000005146905,0.0037021043,0.0001349131,0.00026211294,0.0000032839464,0.000004554442,0.009267041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993283,0.000345886,0.000055773595,0.000036779013,0.0001268792,0.0000066477874,0.0000014404081,0.0000036656104,0.00009458756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709386,0.0006438852,0.00040412703,0.00021163399,0.00041289246,0.0012335925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923575,0.00016792915,0.00029323486,0.00009476755,0.00013594622,0.00007235777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039328504,0.0001091838,0.00022549444,0.00007844218,0.00031830647,0.000015631587,0.00012420968,0.00007279822,0.000010682667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009627291,0.00009601201,0.000026027192,0.00034334388,0.00028192194,0.0008236512,0.000043689288,0.0008393723,5.50985e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005288753,0.000097028664,0.037056055,0.00000488216,0.000056310506,0.000006747028,0.050802454,0.000025598234,0.00001653771,0.9104084,0.000008213703,0.0009888952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030708562,0.00028050411,0.40826195,0.000040557214,0.000030669362,0.000023812645,0.25796103,0.000022640079,0.00012913739,0.3285231,0.0013184418,0.00033728496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9963763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5818853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007485319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049961894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1957331459","doi":"","title":"Replicating and Perpetuating Inequalities in Personal Injury Claims Through Female-Specific Contingencies","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Gender studies; Political science; Personal injury; Sociology; Psychology; Criminology; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07627209118063398,"score_gpt":0.32988526825989245,"score_spread":0.25361317707925846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1957331459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881556,0.0017210059,0.000024778577,0.00082752306,0.00009162243,0.00020026478,0.0000016046495,0.000050830706,0.008926738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950119,0.0013262411,0.0012340766,0.0000049143446,0.00023227069,0.0000015012953,0.0000017208762,0.0000075363714,0.0021798254],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770474,0.00062500447,0.00017115756,0.0003751512,0.000675326,0.0004486004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869084,0.0005982321,0.00012966419,0.00009580958,0.0003654291,0.00012004951],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017675462,0.00011227482,0.0002483505,0.00008974334,0.0037931239,0.00012832237,0.00018900669,0.00013124726,0.000027088048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006047259,0.00012440322,0.000045299046,0.00037074453,0.0014336843,0.0004585598,0.00022770782,0.00073876843,0.0000038687326],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011031049,0.00005796382,0.2103601,0.00010484491,0.000039862814,0.000034389002,0.7716089,0.00001284228,0.007814628,0.0075858063,0.00008173224,0.002188649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068948435,0.00030867144,0.122458,0.00027627285,0.000007626526,0.0000032793496,0.84634113,0.00004547721,0.00016242157,0.0006723973,0.02879225,0.00024296573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026954748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016048313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087902084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000330945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012177724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1958750971","doi":"","title":"Reading Rights: A Woman's Guide to the Law in Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Law; Political science","score_opus":0.017692108616832913,"score_gpt":0.2783308206167965,"score_spread":0.2606387119999636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1958750971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7790996,0.0004894363,5.3898805e-8,0.02548493,0.0003994656,0.00049857475,0.00003168754,0.000031462117,0.1939648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97145617,0.00015009994,0.00003736598,0.010185877,0.00027243834,0.00024658948,0.0000010076858,0.000010064489,0.017640373],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977174,0.0001612363,0.00026004273,0.00029742386,0.00038287495,0.0011810255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989011,0.00022153031,0.00003441418,0.00018634561,0.00011954821,0.00053702435],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048146312,0.00019077638,0.00031940578,0.000053064556,0.0026575373,0.00007148127,0.00042245517,0.000041927873,0.0005456184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002818443,0.00013128933,0.000035447036,0.0005729455,0.00033326418,0.00012958716,0.000047084588,0.00015958614,0.00013255118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017586983,0.00001436171,0.0059750685,0.00002154454,0.00036662573,0.000296036,0.6930637,0.00024089096,0.0000026963935,0.072547995,0.22399458,0.0034589504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088930814,0.000009053159,0.0016159322,0.000024440498,0.000005004593,3.7816048e-7,0.25558957,0.000001077786,0.0000017658185,0.00057656446,0.7419167,0.00017056604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9993943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51792216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013306578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012149669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1959027866","doi":"10.5663/aps.v3i3.22228","title":"R v. Daniels: Issues of Jurisdiction, Identity, and Practical Utility","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"aboriginal policy studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Federal jurisdiction; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Constitution; Constitutional right; Appeal; Sovereignty; Politics","score_opus":0.07623388348564751,"score_gpt":0.48337669453405224,"score_spread":0.4071428110484047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1959027866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8369432,0.006645317,0.00012353667,0.10249918,0.00057526614,0.0006487148,0.000018447208,0.0002170242,0.052329324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98798144,0.008486129,0.0008573325,0.0002476597,0.0011241114,0.000027098393,5.4766303e-7,0.0000065320123,0.0012691763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984021,0.00027881202,0.00026453275,0.0002408685,0.00048452598,0.00032915428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987709,0.00041668714,0.00014409324,0.00012728524,0.00043946787,0.00010154833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009420349,0.00014685463,0.00035706875,0.00005371126,0.00091495446,0.00005517539,0.00011008079,0.00007002045,0.000014530698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028191044,0.00011632486,0.0000601529,0.00033725362,0.0016729177,0.00058390363,0.0001147868,0.00013028213,0.000018043693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025764382,0.00009976065,0.056593217,0.000102698585,0.00028741115,0.0000022137278,0.07309363,3.9899197e-7,0.0000546811,0.8433757,0.023244077,0.0031204757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023950967,0.00008478546,0.10537318,0.000038979277,0.000072957955,0.0000017168538,0.020424604,0.0000072302446,0.00010757726,0.02900705,0.8444594,0.00018299781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033060968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068661133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82121533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010271347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009150597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97337794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963306621","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.962565","title":"Body Politics, Female Genital Cutting and Cultural Relativism: A Critical Evaluation of the Impact of the Criminal Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Cultural relativism; Politics; Female circumcision; Relativism; Law; Political science; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Criminology; Sociology; Philosophy; Human rights; Epistemology; Medicine","score_opus":0.042493511196909924,"score_gpt":0.3962987680809805,"score_spread":0.3538052568840706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963306621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991182,0.0016776171,0.000029759703,0.0013105702,0.00014238826,0.00020450681,0.0000027889482,0.0000058824107,0.005444454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993441,0.00011373728,0.000031878706,0.000018600736,0.00029313314,0.0000013316056,2.1563201e-7,0.0000059532895,0.00019101877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969913,0.0005164393,0.00031595636,0.00010948347,0.0008864295,0.0011804249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998702,0.00027413416,0.0002244136,0.00008786493,0.0006408685,0.00007072765],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051461784,0.00011121488,0.00016273504,0.000017707798,0.0014086624,0.000044307424,0.00024726745,0.00007870114,0.000018178831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002115685,0.00005465773,0.00023187124,0.00016903694,0.0011059686,0.00025108084,0.000076088574,0.0008792279,7.317333e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026686055,0.000082057326,0.051596466,0.000010995734,0.00023392263,4.2352173e-7,0.049344018,0.000024104389,0.0016518224,0.8950595,0.000027143305,0.0019428144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011509032,0.0003772651,0.5557446,0.0001260358,0.0007411961,0.00015426042,0.24625556,0.00026066424,0.0013387541,0.19342315,0.00012947759,0.00029813874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008091967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00454465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7016364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014895869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010672678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963657152","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0004","title":"Section 28 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms : A Purposive Interpretation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Interpretation (philosophy); Charter; Jurisprudence; Intersectionality; Sociology; Human rights; Law; Political science; Gender studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01426809576238141,"score_gpt":0.24288582967832187,"score_spread":0.22861773391594045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963657152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9646172,0.00069670816,0.000003354006,0.02233044,0.00031783932,0.00028061023,0.00001913825,0.0000016092622,0.0117331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99853206,0.00004898647,0.00002143812,0.00044780094,0.00023362049,0.000006667197,3.1867265e-7,0.000003966764,0.0007051484],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990957,0.00018526275,0.00024704795,0.00007065252,0.00014807981,0.00025327172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897903,0.00010703919,0.00026169396,0.00006841988,0.0002381898,0.00034565164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090351555,0.00007706248,0.00022804529,0.00006515546,0.0006149667,0.0000648747,0.00017934336,0.000065062006,0.00004555316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001594118,0.000046147907,0.00007125501,0.000117838164,0.0009837539,0.00020818805,0.000011750779,0.0001799258,6.468491e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059432048,0.000009924204,0.004541473,0.000030279654,0.0002263311,0.000006445767,0.78515863,0.00004013606,0.00004782256,0.20578007,0.0010082222,0.0030912387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0066586765,0.00061546825,0.14750905,0.0011607659,0.00041403677,0.00023599547,0.14512199,0.0005509277,0.00054068107,0.19504209,0.50126696,0.0008833363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7293439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99341625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64003664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074965303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040332176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47298884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963687429","doi":"10.7202/043576ar","title":"Revendications foncières, « autochtonité » et liberté de religion au Canada","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01144126012250717,"score_gpt":0.26484378956292964,"score_spread":0.25340252944042246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963687429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5471014,0.0156231625,0.001060608,0.27514103,0.0012056266,0.0006798389,0.00015645732,0.00020620831,0.15882568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8169389,0.0036837945,0.0044580786,0.0062869755,0.0012547678,0.000074836826,0.00002790897,0.0000348213,0.16723995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972659,0.00042281437,0.00035901266,0.0003687791,0.0005476373,0.0010358648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853766,0.00047502818,0.0002053336,0.00023766483,0.00010572191,0.00043859292],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067517057,0.00026094672,0.00029910065,0.0000371106,0.001631068,0.000081049104,0.00044732666,0.00045769912,0.00018335617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068877713,0.00028223055,0.00016110684,0.00044888302,0.0010700971,0.00028297343,0.000065258064,0.0007650796,0.000096183896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000140726615,0.00012043895,0.0058526224,0.00007449296,0.00021211048,0.000045779452,0.10825077,0.00083262456,0.000107759486,0.66687804,0.17442867,0.043182623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023490141,0.000024387264,0.02962106,0.00010143819,0.000115632465,0.0000128802585,0.004770459,0.00022938602,0.00009993985,0.0045178556,0.959897,0.00037509244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9695948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9864344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7854683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019363128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024647892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965854737","doi":"10.7202/042437ar","title":"Les droits et les obligations des époux : les régimes matrimoniaux","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Political science; Civil code; Law; Power (physics); Institution; Physics","score_opus":0.02538077201243151,"score_gpt":0.3109253890590052,"score_spread":0.2855446170465737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965854737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92932445,0.0026526444,0.0009291248,0.010193866,0.00010228343,0.00035318453,0.000035677218,0.0003940853,0.05601468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96891105,0.0011945771,0.00808099,0.0003014631,0.0004483219,0.0000660077,0.000016490056,0.00003393828,0.020947164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761754,0.00034243133,0.00035033608,0.0003931181,0.0005361061,0.0007604805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998652,0.00052538555,0.00016787945,0.00019841123,0.00020720506,0.00024912856],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071746926,0.00028596673,0.00033341555,0.00009792232,0.0037553282,0.00026578686,0.00048700316,0.00048558973,0.00031935316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008558798,0.00027127846,0.00023323752,0.00042436415,0.0021681327,0.00048244593,0.00008352115,0.00061824254,0.00013454765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024024954,0.00015674175,0.07254074,0.00006506677,0.00022935748,0.000014764477,0.17094156,0.00034766336,0.0008393301,0.58205676,0.004886039,0.16789797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001028873,0.000101955455,0.41951028,0.00020443693,0.00025675958,0.000012475186,0.12922692,0.00022191323,0.0020806608,0.048007816,0.39789048,0.001457428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031646032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041245695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5340489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015875092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010947496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966045565","doi":"10.3138/tjt.21.1.15","title":"The Meeting of the Rivers: Being Native and Christian in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spirituality; Honour; Witness; Gospel; Proclamation; Religious pluralism; Theology; Sociology; Faith; Ecumenism; Evangelism; Ecclesiology; Religious studies; Christianity; Context (archaeology); Pluralism (philosophy); Philosophy; Law; History; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.011151729410688196,"score_gpt":0.27117264867339186,"score_spread":0.26002091926270365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966045565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9605327,0.0073313466,0.000001712879,0.012051803,0.00031590712,0.00007817923,7.71688e-7,0.0000012562474,0.019686308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99853444,0.00096221146,0.00010999658,0.000090823385,0.00015763883,5.546158e-7,1.1677728e-8,0.0000016592544,0.00014268368],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990095,0.0003675891,0.00021648624,0.0000442728,0.00020014582,0.00016204503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895513,0.00056431704,0.00029020017,0.000039576364,0.000117896176,0.00003288769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007974933,0.000048395777,0.00014167256,0.000005049508,0.00042742238,0.000008132626,0.00026116095,0.000026839643,0.00003178156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007537147,0.000024037032,0.000034832057,0.00003313959,0.00042497434,0.00011759224,0.00006838106,0.00011631088,1.2055123e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017332502,0.000045112356,0.2851646,0.000014083031,0.00037928528,0.000018244222,0.54227006,0.00043766,0.00035056335,0.101628006,0.0046425858,0.064876445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010866357,0.0001031821,0.51369137,0.00015203535,0.00006847408,0.000016805128,0.40157464,0.000099948185,0.000403996,0.006198318,0.07639724,0.00020734881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9565016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22852677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009497806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026720075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32874307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967928440","doi":"10.15173/russell.v29i2.2172","title":"&lt;em&gt;Marriage and Morals&lt;/em&gt; Revisited [review of Katie Roiphe, &lt;i&gt;Uncommon Arrangements&lt;/i&gt;]","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.028045053357103798,"score_gpt":0.30150143481770203,"score_spread":0.27345638146059825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967928440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5507464,0.42570493,0.000023495182,0.0090883775,0.0016068381,0.0015476599,0.000055816992,0.00007633342,0.011150158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5844505,0.41179448,0.00054590014,0.0005273952,0.0008966354,0.000021486574,0.000005000673,0.000049204784,0.0017093861],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929038,0.0012492695,0.002160368,0.0005221383,0.0021064288,0.0010579436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936561,0.0017207144,0.0021176725,0.0005840087,0.001492304,0.0004291827],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066984715,0.00082360645,0.0023601498,0.00019064867,0.002379286,0.00018095228,0.0012202968,0.0003077437,0.00042322054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016213654,0.00049059116,0.0007366957,0.0010092142,0.0017463069,0.0007423821,0.00035998333,0.00097331713,0.00004543134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016533948,0.002383402,0.007047235,0.0127747515,0.015410067,0.00021712747,0.2757086,0.00008265301,0.2094214,0.019711407,0.4214161,0.034173887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005216946,0.0009779477,0.020570861,0.008916781,0.004912685,0.00009044578,0.01706591,0.00003149556,0.0025751116,0.00318806,0.9345328,0.0019209549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013318901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004436823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5131167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020225716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013933872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969645668","doi":"10.7202/043619ar","title":"L'incidence du refus de traitement sur le droit à l'indemnisation de la victime d'un préjudice corporel : pour une interprétation conforme au respect des libertés de conscience et de religion","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Conscience; Law","score_opus":0.0157201082136023,"score_gpt":0.2886887968353691,"score_spread":0.27296868862176676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969645668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9324675,0.0009201124,0.027917903,0.020607008,0.0001918656,0.0005489594,0.000023323671,0.00017997035,0.017143354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669173,0.0022573525,0.022351617,0.0023735499,0.0003982202,0.000096151045,0.000014675407,0.000040390183,0.005550776],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99543214,0.001238217,0.0006576753,0.0005810336,0.00068710576,0.0014038308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967789,0.0016701897,0.0005456124,0.00021948316,0.00028407492,0.00050172297],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046936134,0.0003849981,0.00041997063,0.00011597762,0.0017995945,0.00033033636,0.0006099519,0.0006677481,0.00007924063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028495481,0.00044128805,0.00022913962,0.0007520113,0.003598639,0.0010885423,0.00009562867,0.00085125776,0.000061326835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026033202,0.000456962,0.077808954,0.00016318345,0.00022172339,0.00010886542,0.56372184,0.006196008,0.0123775145,0.28743392,0.0026396343,0.04861109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025331778,0.00039115048,0.65533936,0.0008972773,0.00036858558,0.0004054086,0.037674066,0.023954887,0.010752392,0.24486412,0.021488527,0.0013310522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12641929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059961393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5775304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019359712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025402263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969922824","doi":"10.1007/s10691-012-9198-5","title":"Comparing Women in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Situated; State (computer science); Root (linguistics); Feminism; Gender equality; Gender studies; Power (physics); Action (physics); Political science; Sociology; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07023185232347437,"score_gpt":0.3311269559579014,"score_spread":0.26089510363442703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969922824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89052004,0.0043764687,1.9491824e-7,0.0015693898,0.00097150385,0.00017097173,0.000004051787,0.000043207838,0.10234415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965927,0.0002917151,0.000045259556,0.00032141723,0.00048827883,0.00009316095,7.563344e-7,0.00000821008,0.0021585007],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977944,0.00013623014,0.0002637609,0.00017348769,0.00046053686,0.0011716005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926263,0.00027334242,0.00008106088,0.000090213674,0.0000681071,0.00022466743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007520156,0.0001640802,0.00041456998,0.000023763216,0.000959547,0.000042803716,0.00020968182,0.00003767254,0.000056851557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065936573,0.00013702636,0.000037243197,0.0002726203,0.00032989643,0.00025016826,0.00018250356,0.000182003,0.00003690197],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008358435,0.000028266577,0.8289669,0.000015848262,0.00007641944,0.0000070704227,0.15814053,0.0000042428774,0.0000038055962,0.004429865,0.0079255495,0.00039312034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015408038,0.0000068186896,0.27975443,0.000019401978,0.000006070321,4.1070797e-7,0.28959215,0.0000013920334,0.000011345623,0.000035098874,0.43024188,0.00017693156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97708666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99281263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5492125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005553225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037054188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99826425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970048662","doi":"10.7202/042826ar","title":"The Need for a Common Perception of Human Rights in a World of Diversity: A Canadian Perspective","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020669784458363833,"score_gpt":0.2853601672289718,"score_spread":0.26469038277060797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970048662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9681251,0.0009042992,0.000010228701,0.013974847,0.0001249079,0.00055725867,0.000054923545,0.000008772278,0.016239654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98502564,0.000057302084,0.0002372628,0.000107632186,0.0001608004,0.00001771139,0.0000030783717,0.0000053869476,0.014385183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987252,0.00018468506,0.00023273341,0.00017012261,0.00022671872,0.00046055645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991424,0.00029162664,0.00015294974,0.00009987798,0.00017634728,0.00013676716],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050181657,0.00012452212,0.00027714195,0.00010412779,0.0023450765,0.000022981083,0.000299448,0.00018741869,0.00006207271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008805571,0.00010727328,0.0001755278,0.00042960743,0.0020524524,0.00014278908,0.000051959734,0.0002769101,0.000004208151],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039192346,0.00006552646,0.014110904,0.000025972398,0.00010629679,0.0000022336799,0.43846974,0.00003725022,0.00010423946,0.54198056,0.0010421777,0.0040159114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016541072,0.0002549007,0.2352019,0.00025042586,0.00027301346,0.0000011797841,0.5484873,0.0004961342,0.00015513298,0.11854435,0.094182625,0.00049892685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9486574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99572724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42343622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073581585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000072669245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971605660","doi":"10.1177/000842980603500101","title":"Same-sex marriage and the Christian churches in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03906286070468124,"score_gpt":0.3317569925346837,"score_spread":0.2926941318300025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971605660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82538337,0.1093414,0.0000010346639,0.020789271,0.00082410715,0.0007375766,0.000007201778,0.00005868046,0.042857345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9343705,0.064012654,0.00016910624,0.00060828734,0.0002221549,0.000111396745,6.7677104e-7,0.000008290083,0.000496909],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967967,0.00044671757,0.00056337216,0.00053625443,0.00087226543,0.00078463525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747854,0.001991668,0.00017697577,0.00018148459,0.00010528226,0.00006604879],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017833931,0.00026621987,0.0005475576,0.00010616954,0.001640511,0.00012292752,0.0006278131,0.000074273965,0.0000071830086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021489973,0.00016354286,0.00006440214,0.0011048714,0.005790045,0.00021076655,0.0003565347,0.00026336923,0.0000049356504],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087606735,0.00007641366,0.579671,0.000105854684,0.000090790025,0.00011438346,0.081764005,0.0008633425,0.000028007113,0.11737758,0.21873026,0.0010907224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027251078,0.00008798648,0.19191805,0.0004486547,0.000055358447,0.0000083181,0.57341266,0.000086771644,0.00011857089,0.04748968,0.18245265,0.0011961748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49164867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010008689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011193086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971887824","doi":"10.7202/042943ar","title":"Les déclarations des enfants en bas âge au sujet des abus sexuels dont ils ont été victimes: une preuve admissible par exception","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032824665751691066,"score_gpt":0.31406305825529474,"score_spread":0.28123839250360366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971887824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95907587,0.008303868,0.0026918151,0.0059375875,0.0004965153,0.00084993185,0.000115566974,0.00024486013,0.02228399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9338267,0.004282617,0.007116964,0.00031563768,0.0014120513,0.00014814975,0.00003900924,0.00005127367,0.052807584],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955132,0.0008316521,0.00067183457,0.00069143676,0.0007102447,0.0015816151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778336,0.0006240223,0.00031156937,0.00032195795,0.00029144893,0.0006676664],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011744184,0.0005527692,0.00061270973,0.00010296155,0.004481654,0.00031803685,0.0005446304,0.0009688982,0.0007335785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008163307,0.0005429577,0.00034841185,0.0008138632,0.0039428617,0.0012926077,0.00010280454,0.00085407286,0.00026408723],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006364075,0.00042010774,0.040140748,0.00022294618,0.00047830745,0.000027870037,0.6761755,0.0014318393,0.0020260075,0.012912777,0.0021056992,0.2639946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018184034,0.0005015337,0.5282616,0.00087616727,0.00085038197,0.000037356163,0.17988479,0.0010033384,0.004992015,0.03262392,0.24704862,0.0021018838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10463813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32694057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49629065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012063353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036602945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973265457","doi":"10.7202/043738ar","title":"La spécificité patrimoniale de l’union de fait : le libre choix et ses « dommages collatéraux »","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.014753149415898264,"score_gpt":0.27307780260166353,"score_spread":0.25832465318576525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973265457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85322845,0.011715746,0.0011820786,0.06035837,0.00040077025,0.0004590005,0.000101181475,0.00025599438,0.07229841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8854473,0.0059437403,0.0063713086,0.0013445336,0.001306881,0.000048339,0.000013602657,0.000054762768,0.099469505],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99596524,0.0014076168,0.00039530924,0.00048473588,0.0004802763,0.0012668067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824136,0.0007489775,0.00022965665,0.0002362059,0.00011637314,0.00042742147],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016598022,0.0003960837,0.00047959175,0.00006509826,0.0016099474,0.00035933717,0.00056782603,0.0009895168,0.00022594648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005636094,0.0004222809,0.00031963695,0.000573807,0.002137942,0.00065512897,0.00014007675,0.0010143166,0.00015215522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010062781,0.0006033178,0.021390537,0.00028318545,0.00046932173,0.00019477525,0.394721,0.0024074814,0.0023316985,0.21528529,0.07400396,0.2882088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008500242,0.00008058947,0.027242746,0.00016948166,0.00015628646,0.000033104894,0.050716884,0.00043094708,0.0013496338,0.0068851896,0.9113965,0.0006886279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037276264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020227646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8373925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037158048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005569376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974818972","doi":"10.2466/pms.2001.92.2.459","title":"The Emotionality of William Blake's Poems: A Quantitative Comparison of <i>Songs of Innocence</i> with <i>Songs of Experience</i>","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Poetry; Literature; Tone (literature); Romance; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Emotionality; Art; Normative; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Communication; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04315597871166526,"score_gpt":0.35136298245395137,"score_spread":0.3082070037422861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974818972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965632,0.00079752255,0.000033958844,0.0003893398,0.00007197801,0.00038113253,0.00005363688,0.000012276095,0.0016969459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99754554,0.001138076,0.00081344467,0.000020940008,0.000034661432,0.000018760127,0.0000029718806,0.000006271101,0.00041936155],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809927,0.00017316548,0.0005475965,0.0002188306,0.0006957557,0.0002653547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810797,0.00053260033,0.00049210485,0.00014083133,0.00064335804,0.00008310786],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040756827,0.00015990998,0.00052427576,0.000022589762,0.00037434977,0.000014121777,0.00026907615,0.00008267892,0.00006312889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004113824,0.00009593709,0.00009926592,0.00037144992,0.0044376017,0.00021398772,0.000077190656,0.000103449755,0.0000010105301],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023726323,0.0005725693,0.3265126,0.00007554612,0.00011955508,5.981637e-7,0.6513809,0.000011107372,0.011264432,0.0063801296,0.00037582798,0.0030694648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071983295,0.0008568505,0.411072,0.00023811401,0.000060771108,0.0000013249518,0.57255983,0.000023250157,0.0037006,0.00023724714,0.0102827195,0.00024744307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063873297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002366794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08455937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037406924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006744958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99827176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W197505864","doi":"10.29173/alr394","title":"Role and Responsibilities of Counsel for the Child in Alberta: A Practitioner's Perspective and a Response to Professor Bala","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Children's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Best interests; BELLA; Perspective (graphical); Representation (politics); Statutory law; Best practice; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Public relations; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03463488829566423,"score_gpt":0.3583073289808248,"score_spread":0.32367244068516055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W197505864","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24490738,0.23506099,0.0000023011903,0.48068413,0.00015108952,0.0077155465,0.000028125836,0.000019450801,0.03143098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655764,0.024163553,0.00019626593,0.002947146,0.00007501927,0.00076891785,0.0000015001949,0.000013793356,0.0062574195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982951,0.0007514395,0.00025278432,0.00024918036,0.00023173324,0.00021974505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941052,0.0051671616,0.00011872086,0.00015815649,0.00034200383,0.000108714594],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024783022,0.00012403485,0.00035325857,0.000015261454,0.00041798694,0.000037560007,0.00012779479,0.00005555429,0.000011212724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013177145,0.000077904704,0.000052717645,0.00022225591,0.00048064775,0.00022777499,0.00006793849,0.00010152827,0.000005289032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001323457,0.000103651575,0.0009814758,0.00047833548,0.00011263244,7.5783265e-7,0.34623793,0.000001150276,0.000028967956,0.6461478,0.003858512,0.0007253334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006256166,0.00018489666,0.005631595,0.0015544214,0.00011311641,0.0000041169524,0.06661952,0.000006208669,0.000011941054,0.0031926567,0.9218541,0.00020181696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23471819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.455998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9179956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016419138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012668621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975190149","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100009121","title":"Civil Liability for Sexual Assault in Aboriginal Residential Schools: The Baker Did It","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Redress; Tort; Damages; Harm; Credibility; Criminology; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Sexual abuse; Liability; Legal liability; Psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.023280338798985153,"score_gpt":0.3146918399281752,"score_spread":0.29141150112919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975190149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8715558,0.008971211,0.00014260829,0.10392199,0.0045133517,0.0008373747,0.00030404693,0.000009961104,0.009743684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97889024,0.0011015716,0.0005508329,0.0056568235,0.0028031154,0.000017553564,0.0000094582465,0.000039866725,0.010930529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99578136,0.0004115625,0.0011049423,0.00046866832,0.0003752109,0.0018582544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949042,0.0012426567,0.00059714064,0.0002449449,0.0010419575,0.0019690872],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0092917215,0.00039867187,0.0007855635,0.000059730275,0.002281083,0.0003413004,0.0006470395,0.0006625586,0.00020130677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010705265,0.00035922544,0.0006179362,0.00051931024,0.0024849533,0.00078911596,0.000033003013,0.0017215771,0.000004439019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006180225,0.000072831404,0.008851392,0.00034814427,0.0006073431,0.0002468787,0.39480758,0.00007169512,0.000034708402,0.5422949,0.046447154,0.0061555263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011942975,0.00020481889,0.016774544,0.00027723034,0.00023106884,0.00006861099,0.21683547,0.000059456823,0.0000058225905,0.008884671,0.75498796,0.00047604254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6981602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7085408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048770932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031048616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976097333","doi":"10.7202/1028051ar","title":"A Practitioner's Guide to The Economic Implications of Custody and Access under the Divorce Act and the Federal Child Support Guidelines","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child support; Child custody; Section (typography); Context (archaeology); Family law; Child protection; Law; Psychology; Political science; Business; Geography","score_opus":0.05251865639040878,"score_gpt":0.36195296818000305,"score_spread":0.3094343117895943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976097333","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38114712,0.00057938613,0.00016367872,0.5630621,0.00017794804,0.001102541,0.000033796754,0.000038753577,0.053694677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99416524,0.0005731684,0.0001550969,0.0025830907,0.00051675324,0.000117061805,0.0000036022616,0.000008252276,0.001877706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990058,0.0001806497,0.00027299268,0.00018319937,0.00013344963,0.0002239151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990065,0.0003103233,0.000174376,0.00023040081,0.000171121,0.000107258995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013134578,0.00008481117,0.0001772514,0.000014788462,0.0012279962,0.00025152622,0.00044068007,0.00005132479,0.000024868423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006425355,0.000052208965,0.000059436974,0.00011179501,0.00055642857,0.00026185327,0.00023405063,0.00012079314,0.000015682872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012243954,0.00006688497,0.062063344,0.000047788086,0.00042589175,0.000002093389,0.105773784,0.005193457,0.000049404207,0.46089303,0.35837942,0.006982457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015318687,0.00006617832,0.4411846,0.000070683134,0.0002230031,0.000074358104,0.057241984,0.00050408853,0.00004054153,0.0397667,0.45884335,0.0004526272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014069742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022124643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61301816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022399367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012795079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976724405","doi":"10.7202/043562ar","title":"Les sources des droits ancestraux des peuples autochtones","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03916705989347929,"score_gpt":0.3048308721326693,"score_spread":0.26566381223919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976724405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9038149,0.050792694,0.00062785053,0.0073624724,0.00045244707,0.00039903788,0.000049216153,0.00032389016,0.036177475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8836279,0.009594814,0.010421322,0.0003201388,0.0017642749,0.00006294803,0.00000867084,0.00005500141,0.09414491],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99598897,0.00043661467,0.0005561384,0.00066384726,0.0007059312,0.0016484953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981532,0.0005581264,0.00028870147,0.0002501413,0.00025263207,0.0004971876],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007758599,0.00056151586,0.0006258239,0.00008664755,0.0045375433,0.0003649951,0.00074103335,0.00080370816,0.0008173834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006373117,0.0005565128,0.00041449515,0.0007036534,0.012984836,0.0009645246,0.00011369673,0.00082424167,0.00032826944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033007393,0.00023267505,0.039417926,0.00029572935,0.00033539088,0.000037572834,0.2641157,0.0008437965,0.0003453196,0.20400693,0.0014854848,0.48885047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009301279,0.00020340711,0.22555651,0.000695932,0.00048975303,0.000054666296,0.109041266,0.00063456263,0.001593847,0.05835885,0.600676,0.0017650914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03904239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044833623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59919053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036525992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012493551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977077970","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0017","title":"Granovsky v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) : Adding Insult to Injury?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insult; Immigration; Political science; Law; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01984727827338229,"score_gpt":0.26385912846239407,"score_spread":0.24401185018901178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977077970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9334692,0.00064233807,0.0000022685224,0.06115808,0.00017132662,0.00016794565,0.000033899443,0.0000022095787,0.0043527335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950822,0.00012918096,0.000097267584,0.0027423357,0.00021763517,0.0000070332776,5.947174e-7,0.0000062009813,0.0017175651],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989556,0.00011644083,0.00031024576,0.00009352096,0.00018035987,0.00034380058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988817,0.00014139165,0.00017399601,0.0000675962,0.00015216297,0.0005831335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008043067,0.00009861172,0.00028175162,0.00005002825,0.0005191397,0.00009125661,0.00017462746,0.00003814672,0.000051352934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018238826,0.00007115082,0.000041623458,0.00013105864,0.00035316797,0.0001749087,0.000023022496,0.0001363958,0.0000010097579],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001736983,0.000022666227,0.0117134275,0.000043450218,0.00031426296,0.00003718694,0.62660587,0.000039848976,0.000064282474,0.3311498,0.008733028,0.02110248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011190736,0.00014935831,0.013486799,0.00012661798,0.000040192015,0.000021984226,0.056752693,0.0000064741203,0.00007834929,0.0026061158,0.92536724,0.0002451114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7939655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9166342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007972037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006474861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39928553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977854395","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402240460","title":"Natural Law Modernized. By David Braybrooke. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001. 351p. $70.00.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Natural law; Natural (archaeology); Postmodernism; Utilitarianism; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.02961032787433917,"score_gpt":0.3285258358194835,"score_spread":0.2989155079451444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977854395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00324445,0.45450738,0.00002555054,0.021103946,0.00030032554,0.0010726459,0.0000694051,0.00018740103,0.5194889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7052181,0.28782508,0.00071656605,0.002333199,0.00010958482,0.0000054874786,0.0000026299326,0.000009799895,0.00377959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99612963,0.00032103012,0.0003246879,0.00053692097,0.0011509865,0.0015367441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813443,0.00022658244,0.000211129,0.00033681036,0.00023654616,0.00085450785],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008210313,0.0002243098,0.00064673246,0.0000034665231,0.0010714037,0.00006139428,0.0011121649,0.00004899717,0.002045429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078693253,0.00018388723,0.00019729539,0.00024687606,0.009475546,0.0011979757,0.00025484417,0.00015308472,0.00006828888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013896389,0.00044606024,0.00043510672,0.00046296685,0.00008847161,0.000010495527,0.008173279,5.362007e-7,0.00063351064,0.69700634,0.19571304,0.097016305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014593794,0.000074206146,0.0007080446,0.00031660023,0.000070395516,0.0000014539944,0.003150694,0.00009518207,0.000038861723,0.00014629833,0.9948968,0.00035551903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73992735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062554285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7991838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019801455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000112190464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99886686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977865709","doi":"10.5539/ass.v10n10p182","title":"Counselors’ Spiritual Competence in Malaysia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Ethnic group; Psychology; Descriptive research; Descriptive statistics; Social psychology; Medical education; Sociology; Social science; Medicine","score_opus":0.02205455394863166,"score_gpt":0.3104775698394054,"score_spread":0.28842301589077374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977865709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26260835,0.00003231746,0.00007984207,0.010458302,0.00050510303,0.00027217207,0.0000024693556,0.00012123535,0.7259202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99796295,0.00001955393,0.00045620406,0.000485421,0.00053153164,0.000018382418,6.772862e-7,0.000006541419,0.00051873364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997035,0.00023315688,0.00024402823,0.00044842734,0.0011583925,0.00088099646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926925,0.00011235618,0.000105126725,0.0001227521,0.00019341218,0.00019712861],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023350192,0.0001481344,0.00024072125,0.00007975657,0.0026575627,0.00023410014,0.0009028678,0.000104704646,0.00011090837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084149267,0.00013626725,0.000068451016,0.0014112176,0.0043552043,0.00067335553,0.00012840141,0.00022883771,0.00018341481],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008337342,0.00008366116,0.020843955,0.000007713091,0.000005514282,0.0000064290984,0.17053242,0.000002073251,0.0011054603,0.68965495,0.0012062186,0.116543286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004974421,0.00005298075,0.77322215,0.00003230078,0.000009019434,9.374238e-7,0.049997292,0.00007388091,0.000106770836,0.01132841,0.16411065,0.00056816096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003922129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029807228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7523782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005046724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002286708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99864084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977892117","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100010206","title":"Multidimensionality and the Matrix: Identifying Charter Violations in Cases of Complex Subordination","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Privilege (computing); Charter; Subordination (linguistics); Sociology; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisdiction; Law; Law and economics; Epistemology; Computer science; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03651887711052631,"score_gpt":0.3207720655731241,"score_spread":0.2842531884625978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977892117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869788,0.000466836,0.000008736881,0.0106135085,0.00037355072,0.00021102485,0.000037901278,0.000003269589,0.0013063248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998518,0.00027192844,0.00036740635,0.00050534867,0.00015081793,0.000004274013,0.000004235977,0.000007049877,0.00017092189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988638,0.00018554291,0.00038548076,0.00012723736,0.000115730516,0.0003221971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982468,0.00062356994,0.00027926336,0.000081396596,0.0003698079,0.00039916646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019804132,0.00010362992,0.00031588273,0.00003756894,0.0010151594,0.00008137235,0.00014211131,0.00012158532,0.000058663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005810348,0.00008524053,0.00015787366,0.00014825717,0.0014266735,0.000295042,0.00001859147,0.00039421508,2.807653e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009863359,0.000011893336,0.010654823,0.000049627695,0.00009279615,0.000023063465,0.23431247,0.000006757342,0.00054501457,0.75313383,0.0003934019,0.0007664708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0065403115,0.00011398472,0.4779877,0.0004111037,0.0003392424,0.0002656461,0.3778492,0.0010593483,0.00005788378,0.06287636,0.07162512,0.0008741174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4822757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9575601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69025743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028722876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032237882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7807888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978852772","doi":"10.7202/043053ar","title":"Les personnes morales dans le droit privé du Québec","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.01473975786034105,"score_gpt":0.24794799836910028,"score_spread":0.23320824050875924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978852772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87885725,0.016141368,0.00077894353,0.06994819,0.0005165437,0.0003910339,0.0000510728,0.00024642423,0.033069164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8493336,0.0016968735,0.002388566,0.000639801,0.0023822954,0.000051365016,0.000011750002,0.000050951166,0.1434448],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967492,0.0003852362,0.00045436018,0.0006181093,0.0006125775,0.0011805166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985174,0.00040952233,0.0002463429,0.00027869627,0.00015950346,0.00038853256],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006046398,0.00046316194,0.00056367664,0.00006179661,0.0032426517,0.00020886732,0.0007412409,0.0006952794,0.00076234573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005301032,0.0004848035,0.00044395702,0.0004361379,0.005683089,0.00064505625,0.00012253295,0.0007844144,0.0005500535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033853576,0.00035888096,0.034659494,0.00014412196,0.0003924722,0.00005110508,0.5491055,0.0006291386,0.0004967398,0.293837,0.009580319,0.11071131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007657048,0.000102299186,0.051439267,0.00014913293,0.0002599098,0.00002823354,0.18054104,0.0008334461,0.0005819916,0.003361011,0.7608812,0.0010567631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5970615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64666754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7513009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076319035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036052847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978944960","doi":"10.1353/vcr.2009.0039","title":"Religious Experience and the New Woman: The Life of Lily Dougall (review)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victorian review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Publishing; Religious studies; History; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024523308663296862,"score_gpt":0.3268460889009632,"score_spread":0.30232278023766634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978944960","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006458421,0.8321701,0.000003178609,0.15985966,0.0002548855,0.0011049381,8.654206e-7,0.00003205928,0.0059284484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06120604,0.9202839,0.000070186026,0.017400626,0.0005272519,0.00004075214,3.952437e-7,0.0000044238905,0.00046639636],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981849,0.0004652014,0.00041635937,0.00020247522,0.0004732317,0.00025783945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988544,0.00028098526,0.00028444134,0.00030817813,0.00012766439,0.0001443542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011999146,0.00015462385,0.0005595118,0.000006556466,0.00048145038,0.00003629365,0.00053551304,0.000036035086,0.00006704789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002168529,0.00006799524,0.00016957088,0.00043540963,0.0007048639,0.00010136704,0.0000658342,0.00014238202,0.000033632557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003239095,0.000052401316,0.00045420954,0.0022153314,0.00012062184,0.000004076176,0.1375365,2.0314204e-7,0.000016220649,0.07530033,0.6763935,0.10787422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017852415,0.000022672835,0.0014571522,0.0025659099,0.00010113433,8.093167e-7,0.00062005676,1.8871023e-7,0.0000017861684,0.00032160216,0.9946272,0.0001029761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015514744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028199056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31823367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003823394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008512169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37029758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979613786","doi":"10.7202/043278ar","title":"L'adoption d'un enfant contre la volonté de ses parents","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.011178437272037442,"score_gpt":0.26848013839938856,"score_spread":0.2573017011273511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979613786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95795965,0.010204158,0.00068927184,0.012782804,0.00054591574,0.0003058489,0.0000474036,0.00013450897,0.017330457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9447716,0.003769619,0.002728001,0.0009582766,0.0011180809,0.00003734306,0.000011719168,0.000023870287,0.046581496],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974255,0.0005616808,0.00030935716,0.0003527104,0.00042437075,0.0009263683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884313,0.00041728182,0.00017880808,0.00014928015,0.00010465359,0.0003068216],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007100366,0.00027792098,0.00035119115,0.000033498265,0.0011215159,0.00014173567,0.00032454042,0.0006542083,0.00028570654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004544783,0.00027843914,0.00023110311,0.0002558178,0.001691649,0.00034336455,0.00005854975,0.0006104155,0.00025832173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008397663,0.0004508365,0.06310058,0.00012413634,0.0005763725,0.00012126264,0.2942532,0.00056583784,0.0006917189,0.14458032,0.010112447,0.4853393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011022866,0.000085983665,0.09447011,0.00017775368,0.00030735077,0.000025099796,0.044554632,0.0008261085,0.00057799224,0.0058649066,0.85129315,0.0007146217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010604957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059088864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8411807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003462158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009634521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980260806","doi":"10.1017/cls.2013.2","title":"Public Reason and the Disempowerment of Aboriginal People in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Normative; Ambivalence; Politics; Sociology; Political philosophy; Space (punctuation); Political science; Epistemology; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013089511489178541,"score_gpt":0.24951517919449764,"score_spread":0.23642566770531911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980260806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9574381,0.002197784,0.0000016715705,0.031836405,0.00034615662,0.00030396474,0.000029618988,0.0000022126142,0.007844051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967049,0.0015345399,0.00006454726,0.0011559486,0.00012673315,0.000013128979,0.0000019496672,0.000009564767,0.00038869906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842453,0.00019970236,0.00041738927,0.00015240558,0.00018182783,0.0006241607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978826,0.0003453315,0.00029103248,0.000102329315,0.00037574273,0.0010029386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001119426,0.00014477748,0.00045668744,0.000027902097,0.000711758,0.00012441374,0.00027049024,0.000089790534,0.00011294444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025402656,0.000112477195,0.0001404129,0.00021150797,0.0009803026,0.0003484376,0.000017710812,0.0003488998,3.4439748e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007644498,0.000011328354,0.03587828,0.00006725355,0.00017533866,0.000026486508,0.33008018,0.0000077063005,0.000006717109,0.62734085,0.004269284,0.0021289468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003093039,0.00009129661,0.22851098,0.00025447417,0.00012339841,0.0000571811,0.54998684,0.00012978342,0.0000042972065,0.013814249,0.2033725,0.0005619859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99919504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6135266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023824337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042935167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7616514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W198097382","doi":"","title":"Reform of the Law Relating to Unincorporated Nonprofit Associations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Voluntary association; Corporate law; Business; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.027887554189181863,"score_gpt":0.29006288957273835,"score_spread":0.2621753353835565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W198097382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9216808,0.00037698288,0.000060558366,0.011682637,0.00026162612,0.00025111268,0.00000409331,0.000037915062,0.06564424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99120194,0.00040679955,0.00012213137,0.000152711,0.00022188619,0.0000040457826,7.295531e-7,0.000007976025,0.007881796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997722,0.0002087621,0.00028131684,0.00010169264,0.0005214433,0.0011647732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991198,0.000066907756,0.00032506543,0.000090449794,0.00032425713,0.00007348103],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016236533,0.00008824605,0.0001578012,0.000022578715,0.0030915537,0.00002178009,0.00034189576,0.00008237523,0.000014919286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037448166,0.00005614432,0.00012076125,0.0005478329,0.0002492076,0.00019567239,0.00006258018,0.0010017639,0.000019756111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008468425,0.000033008833,0.028152052,0.0000012017495,0.00014408922,9.464638e-7,0.020734446,0.000049105594,0.0004039248,0.9496417,0.00028221644,0.0005488279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002390193,0.0007018154,0.2932669,0.00018499159,0.00024972518,0.00013303642,0.33848476,0.00004834309,0.0014494427,0.3089943,0.052864272,0.0012322292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022475965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07992512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6406474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00393112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012777791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983194792","doi":"10.1163/157181109x394353","title":"Restless Spirits in the Land: Finding a Place in Canadian Law for Aboriginal Civil Disobedience","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal on Minority and Group Rights","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Civil disobedience; Law; Constitution; Political science; State (computer science); Interim; Supreme court; Original intent; Action (physics); Notice; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.023638458514971452,"score_gpt":0.3469895918262996,"score_spread":0.3233511333113282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983194792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9650976,0.00015206098,0.000006029837,0.021002198,0.00051080517,0.00018579306,0.000017060285,0.0000049724763,0.013023494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979981,0.00009570604,0.00009568676,0.000974559,0.00066144404,0.000007235388,0.000003059257,0.0000013313587,0.00016287391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884754,0.00011273151,0.00017784619,0.00013921261,0.00041438238,0.0003083058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994478,0.00024114465,0.00006686224,0.000034977184,0.00008492938,0.00012425568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086383463,0.00008740781,0.00010700902,0.0000949473,0.00071811926,0.00028213713,0.0003603126,0.00006398193,0.000016255868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000084743646,0.000055277676,0.000041173476,0.00010313808,0.0001226233,0.0003121378,0.0000064565843,0.00028666214,0.0000030810909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010890193,0.00013025459,0.055544406,0.0000032584276,0.00001672652,0.00021246847,0.026154261,0.000023386867,0.000009815242,0.914918,0.0007653145,0.002113224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010385561,0.00013104081,0.386168,0.00013167673,0.0000069510525,0.000023178392,0.0010946649,0.00007033532,0.0000057030625,0.0379391,0.5732041,0.0001866794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5041472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9726551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8769789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043078527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007175315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5523265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984198735","doi":"10.3138/md.47.3.446","title":"Traumatizing Romanticism in Brian Friel's <i>Faith Healer</i>","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Drama","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Romanticism; Faith; Literature; Psychic; Allusion; Intertextuality; Philosophy; Art; History; Epistemology","score_opus":0.034419382826045224,"score_gpt":0.3010543044388367,"score_spread":0.26663492161279145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984198735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9459359,0.00047403964,0.0005789785,0.014611109,0.00024514642,0.00037961008,0.0000035690957,0.00016232912,0.03760931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973514,0.00007733752,0.0011882434,0.00045927116,0.00020894015,0.000023655228,0.0000020631303,0.000015013193,0.0006740925],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983704,0.00010039754,0.00025470924,0.00028722975,0.00043103241,0.0005562211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995512,0.00006490825,0.000069406844,0.00013434589,0.00005244043,0.00012774639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003563299,0.00015348372,0.00025158573,0.000044025994,0.00067415566,0.00014192911,0.00025823427,0.00012499481,0.000043032065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001585925,0.00013779214,0.00008211093,0.00025320897,0.00023289413,0.00032273334,0.000060509406,0.00021309576,0.0000922638],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003807885,0.00040107846,0.013421592,0.000058322574,0.0000743106,0.00013532348,0.86277807,0.001998523,0.0014535071,0.07425432,0.0008604165,0.044526473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012368468,0.00034186814,0.45093694,0.0012065909,0.00013097665,0.000019585066,0.15701589,0.0025280803,0.0020842901,0.21908495,0.15052933,0.0037530267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041307256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04464913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70576215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043827883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008866877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9727835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984515512","doi":"10.7202/043175ar","title":"Towards an Integrated, Liberal Theory of the Canadian State","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Institution; Politics; Law and economics; Power (physics); Political science; Perspective (graphical); Conflation; Public sphere; Law; Sociology; Political philosophy; Action (physics); State action; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013415764495506268,"score_gpt":0.2591743925655902,"score_spread":0.24575862807008395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984515512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9446716,0.00015224284,0.00006561304,0.004784935,0.00014723832,0.000202326,0.000035005793,0.000044686873,0.04989637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818931,0.000044957542,0.0006819815,0.0009043451,0.00013638225,0.000008936495,0.0000028018735,0.000008973032,0.016318474],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998758,0.0003011362,0.00013687879,0.00013360953,0.00026284778,0.0004075132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994185,0.00006061524,0.00006342832,0.00013678947,0.000100394565,0.00022027286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006481094,0.00009720355,0.0001316073,0.000029631332,0.0010425408,0.00006353806,0.0004079355,0.00014868754,0.00015981139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029395547,0.00006697902,0.00008768873,0.00021849669,0.0012086901,0.00016708215,0.000022055745,0.0003220047,0.000013613246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026457452,0.00004231552,0.008334541,0.000009840817,0.00010536567,0.00000602278,0.44381493,0.00020893416,0.0001156284,0.2923597,0.002434418,0.2525418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005893814,0.0000786572,0.19388261,0.00005772377,0.00008559816,0.0000035899209,0.092380464,0.00014467946,0.0015732069,0.09774976,0.6127982,0.0006561185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5776951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9428687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6103638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022177296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040952244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8018486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985488337","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100006189","title":"Judicial Notice: The Very Texture of Legal Reasoning","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Notice; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Legal doctrine; Principal (computer security); Judicial opinion; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.013593595124143883,"score_gpt":0.26540533452861653,"score_spread":0.25181173940447266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985488337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90321374,0.002477779,0.0000054862194,0.013963881,0.00071198493,0.00022245839,0.000061315084,0.000010158982,0.07933319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992167,0.0008026773,0.00015998406,0.0028400542,0.000951389,0.000003061544,0.0000028280817,0.00001746505,0.0030555343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823976,0.000203622,0.00044746965,0.00018179612,0.00021485446,0.0007125024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800444,0.00029584084,0.00029933907,0.0001403353,0.00037863973,0.0008814175],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014336873,0.00018214589,0.00044984426,0.000025075615,0.0019849143,0.00015091732,0.00042382427,0.00023164338,0.00040112596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003406954,0.0001492452,0.00040590353,0.000242785,0.0015684061,0.00039846986,0.00001583157,0.0006528453,0.0000026003408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017995826,0.000017333756,0.00083957345,0.00005188392,0.0003880613,0.000102805636,0.36415973,0.00008613227,0.000030426849,0.61384416,0.009952989,0.010508933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008173401,0.00013760367,0.0083512375,0.0002880435,0.000263809,0.00009830799,0.14939724,0.000053517706,0.000013025463,0.0041666073,0.8359758,0.00043743587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5003402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86580557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82602286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008093091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012317046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99931437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985954621","doi":"10.3138/ecf.26.2.165","title":"Ideal Friendship and the Paradoxes of Narration in Sarah Fielding’s <i>David Simple</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Ideal (ethics); Character (mathematics); Narrative; Adventure; Skepticism; Simple (philosophy); Power (physics); Aesthetics; Literature; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Art; Art history; Social science","score_opus":0.016305513343385467,"score_gpt":0.2695140332003083,"score_spread":0.25320851985692283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985954621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97952193,0.0034579893,0.000025674393,0.005055724,0.0005102068,0.000766339,0.0000039899614,0.000044648325,0.010613493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939484,0.0055321553,0.00006131481,0.00010259516,0.00020166909,0.000076079996,0.000009002662,0.0000050860813,0.000063675136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986874,0.00027299792,0.00029849898,0.00018472412,0.00031630517,0.0002400781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999351,0.00025918326,0.00015210884,0.00009530677,0.00009186706,0.000050481794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047826977,0.00011004539,0.00019150895,0.000035036035,0.0005231617,0.00007824357,0.00011924896,0.00010670628,0.00018469882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023102155,0.00007235289,0.00006248975,0.00021029568,0.00035637652,0.00040201182,0.000042761047,0.00015530484,0.000012678577],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005087377,0.0006255861,0.121378206,0.00012301933,0.00017521414,0.0000029950568,0.34826407,0.000058306123,0.0025168217,0.40303463,0.06350851,0.059803892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0114039,0.00037464025,0.41424006,0.0001807811,0.0001373689,0.0000033636577,0.15095308,0.001634208,0.0015511896,0.014808756,0.4036949,0.0010177412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011933417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010803838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38822588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008619406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001655981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986750507","doi":"10.1007/s10780-014-9209-3","title":"Freedom of Conscience and Catholic Schools","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interchange","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Bible College","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Charter; Alliance; Academic freedom; Freedom of thought; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Political science; Sociology; Freedom of religion; Higher education; Human rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05821436567191625,"score_gpt":0.3273957715885819,"score_spread":0.2691814059166657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986750507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.982848,0.00053384976,0.000008883271,0.005409237,0.00017450796,0.00026588351,0.000004824672,0.00003085185,0.010723954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981339,0.00017002287,0.00044321743,0.00013313675,0.00009527608,0.000036925292,2.6790775e-7,0.0000026743774,0.0009845865],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932355,0.00006871279,0.00010464604,0.00012288161,0.0001838654,0.000196368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956477,0.00008892304,0.000049185746,0.000068704016,0.00014416262,0.00008424463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021847799,0.000059832866,0.000115957686,0.000026304624,0.00021326519,0.000053476742,0.00016963726,0.000043891665,0.0002521827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044661685,0.000045286142,0.000027365604,0.000118280484,0.00077038846,0.0002508394,0.00010646126,0.00007884466,0.000111057496],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060896746,0.000097639124,0.088903405,0.00006989423,0.00005940452,0.0000044620724,0.7606393,4.7232828e-7,0.023023942,0.019952502,0.016367773,0.0908751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087583676,0.0002768228,0.6160812,0.00032309938,0.0000442508,0.0000053144367,0.20622031,0.00014192739,0.002570186,0.00440869,0.16827695,0.0007754652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056071725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047827098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.554419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049302635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017291812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95021397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990377031","doi":"10.7202/037461ar","title":"L’affaire Bruker c. Marcovitz : variations sur un thème","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013544744474243055,"score_gpt":0.2539082478714212,"score_spread":0.24036350339717813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990377031","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55788815,0.018414307,0.0045824265,0.25188324,0.0026934124,0.0010932004,0.0001529996,0.00052379665,0.16276848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8757198,0.0014074602,0.0023805553,0.0022318282,0.0008811079,0.000018129884,0.000016364047,0.00002158514,0.11732317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972154,0.00038618853,0.00036286513,0.00044846063,0.0005618399,0.0010252394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986784,0.00037527844,0.00017770627,0.00024252044,0.00018479771,0.00034130306],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061463023,0.0003203788,0.00039608928,0.00005031504,0.0019952427,0.00017799,0.00045079534,0.0006732005,0.0009826799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005757834,0.00033051975,0.00030964022,0.0007167348,0.0012660509,0.00048377976,0.00004533304,0.00072350545,0.0003922428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018207338,0.00025142301,0.0024859358,0.00003469564,0.00023031037,0.00006803649,0.0842974,0.00006546984,0.00017140628,0.7305277,0.0137081,0.1681413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010722526,0.00020212903,0.2257664,0.00015060628,0.00043741928,0.00001809601,0.017985113,0.0005784749,0.00013932043,0.18058184,0.5718892,0.0011791402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007712875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023760349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5581811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028196387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015159647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990658214","doi":"10.1017/s0020589300064642","title":"Constitutional Challenges to Sexual Orientation Discrimination","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Statutory law; Lesbian; Legislation; Same sex; Law; Political science; Convention; Human rights; Legislature; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.0891685153541418,"score_gpt":0.3677277836966911,"score_spread":0.2785592683425493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990658214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68834054,0.00018688235,0.00018906443,0.014637825,0.00035826012,0.0002444911,0.00002917296,0.000056172677,0.2959576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996054,0.000044190434,0.00026036205,0.0003145754,0.00030719183,0.00004731231,0.000021479163,0.000001300412,0.0029496185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906784,0.00008687478,0.00014163247,0.00021405707,0.00035547506,0.0001341217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995774,0.00008343644,0.000033706026,0.00003782673,0.00018310116,0.00008454958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012125593,0.00009070764,0.0001062744,0.000016224934,0.0005122184,0.00010458352,0.000112656235,0.00003298708,0.00055031944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008144979,0.00007803439,0.000021819971,0.000053471464,0.000586986,0.00040906123,0.00000826686,0.000056258148,0.00019066305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030138879,0.000044767185,0.0001341005,0.000001674277,0.00003112378,0.0000010236863,0.09923552,0.0000111906775,0.000046462836,0.8626726,0.00028178,0.0375096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067323045,0.0004024695,0.043107778,0.000035340745,0.000019833713,0.000004102432,0.12748986,0.00013827268,0.00006286776,0.014518697,0.8131876,0.0003599352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021270635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007246777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84815395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009461971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014800256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6025612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990757294","doi":"10.1177/000842980403300106","title":"The Presbyterian Church in Canada and the Pope: One denomination's struggle with its confessional history","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confessional; Confession (law); Faith; Offensive; Church history; Theology; Law; Religious studies; History; Political science; Philosophy; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.052109918776653885,"score_gpt":0.3228595612782456,"score_spread":0.2707496425015917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990757294","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84721196,0.10690041,0.0000010593236,0.029138079,0.0008751597,0.00088848174,0.000004437147,0.000029705077,0.014950702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93618286,0.06242002,0.00012406832,0.00046785857,0.000094433126,0.00017285704,4.205606e-7,0.000006900637,0.0005306018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730164,0.0003209996,0.00038527735,0.00040974029,0.0010114395,0.00057088636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997857,0.0014869221,0.00019470503,0.00015609214,0.0002342555,0.0000710746],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014063627,0.00020228286,0.00033745493,0.000058394406,0.0022123696,0.000090220754,0.0006479992,0.000052155527,0.0000074361515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017238365,0.00010066604,0.000032328026,0.0005134054,0.005575898,0.00025758607,0.00029265898,0.00024628857,0.0000027751203],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005263913,0.00019243202,0.097556755,0.00014772853,0.00033909734,0.00008105617,0.26034105,0.0025551438,0.00014951275,0.5523547,0.08380835,0.0019477748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0061581307,0.00029634233,0.27771062,0.0011164055,0.000084129126,0.000014211614,0.4107077,0.000031594114,0.00015043445,0.018967709,0.28352195,0.0012407382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92057776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9875694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.533387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002697313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034957621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991481877","doi":"10.7202/043249ar","title":"Réflexions fiscales sur la famille","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.01593386171021422,"score_gpt":0.27000778522499497,"score_spread":0.25407392351478075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991481877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6216626,0.020083109,0.00050156267,0.10323882,0.00093338435,0.00037022945,0.00009073734,0.00023710886,0.25288245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6409241,0.0037834872,0.002212983,0.0014350142,0.0011908591,0.000028966577,0.000008278811,0.000026348336,0.35038996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762136,0.0003951119,0.0003034002,0.00036678085,0.00044255125,0.00087078084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985053,0.00076654,0.00012171325,0.00018673582,0.00010286243,0.00031684793],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054415414,0.0002741236,0.00034629353,0.00003841588,0.001412242,0.00013365262,0.0004019247,0.0006439673,0.0007359091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005270328,0.00027442834,0.00028945782,0.00038657073,0.0030922634,0.00041668085,0.00008219858,0.00070756866,0.00071533513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000218136,0.00028448258,0.0026788926,0.00007730709,0.00028629744,0.00004740134,0.13053524,0.0004180107,0.00018307222,0.59000677,0.086884245,0.18857644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033615256,0.000031959575,0.008662317,0.00007252926,0.00009810036,0.0000078297535,0.0129773645,0.00028684447,0.00009061009,0.008490175,0.96853715,0.00040897637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009079152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009642118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8816529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023133736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000101907106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992897212","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.26.1.23","title":"Race Matters: Sexism, Indigenous Sovereignty, and <i>McIvor</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Indigenous; Injustice; Transformative learning; Gender studies; Race (biology); Sociology; Colonialism; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Racism; Economic Justice; Dominance (genetics); Law; Politics","score_opus":0.019065747396475985,"score_gpt":0.25121861528699324,"score_spread":0.23215286789051726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992897212","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91470844,0.0020095103,0.00001125903,0.0498764,0.0003568528,0.00023383331,0.000012364569,0.000010234008,0.03278111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900863,0.00039081345,0.000061266466,0.006961482,0.00041275137,0.0000055211276,5.4793287e-7,0.0000114925215,0.002069789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985928,0.00030859635,0.0002483034,0.00012642507,0.00016645913,0.000557437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985726,0.00031940883,0.00021181397,0.00009676184,0.00009813966,0.00070126925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019352826,0.00013235935,0.00036436197,0.000049127426,0.0011199039,0.00030026466,0.00027729297,0.00007949793,0.00010589089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020319062,0.000093674025,0.0000699326,0.00010292971,0.0010038933,0.00026393178,0.000034680466,0.00027418032,0.0000084830135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004005393,0.00000959255,0.0034753298,0.00003677875,0.00014819152,0.00003721913,0.47127217,0.000007127605,0.000005414982,0.5195343,0.002063488,0.0033703516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028024649,0.00020080143,0.0054839025,0.00015979889,0.00008141008,0.0001882992,0.082650304,0.000013680628,0.000012890848,0.2571278,0.6508207,0.00045798783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05066072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15818545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64875716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003828888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020909544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.955661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994521795","doi":"10.7202/043620ar","title":"L'encadrement législatif des rapports pécuniaires entre époux : un grand ménage s'impose pour les nouveaux ménages","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.015807636541542977,"score_gpt":0.2570886389436978,"score_spread":0.24128100240215483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994521795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90634066,0.032356106,0.0008081245,0.023692638,0.0007370116,0.0008403604,0.000079541394,0.00027825168,0.034867298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88647795,0.009526775,0.0068152416,0.00074565265,0.0014674031,0.000069179,0.000022538843,0.000066335626,0.09480892],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99491644,0.0007564689,0.00077735045,0.0008353431,0.0009870849,0.0017273048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978862,0.0005103003,0.00041756133,0.00037799464,0.00022518223,0.0005827608],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012460947,0.0007166396,0.00075643597,0.00012368054,0.0034365577,0.00031697104,0.0007246291,0.0008127196,0.0023995445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039898852,0.00069819466,0.0005458146,0.00059046707,0.004464198,0.0007401889,0.00020018806,0.000912624,0.00031812905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079562305,0.00067076966,0.047313247,0.00029306483,0.00092340383,0.00024396685,0.24114175,0.0004453659,0.0009093353,0.034795824,0.02206713,0.65111655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027631754,0.00023249119,0.1359986,0.000669387,0.0010828286,0.000050863673,0.12226548,0.00049509184,0.003453434,0.029800447,0.7007629,0.0024252925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077824113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010076717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6786958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036031897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021477266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994861759","doi":"10.1179/003962611x12894696204821","title":"TSILHQOT'IN NATION v. BRITISH COLUMBIA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Survey Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Gazi Üniversitesi","keywords":"Statutory law; Jurisprudence; Law; Common law; Order (exchange); Political science; High Court; Foundation (evidence); Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.17413079094661135,"score_gpt":0.3510488529002058,"score_spread":0.17691806195359447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994861759","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25914082,0.4447568,0.000007701702,0.0016465719,0.0015703067,0.0033071272,0.000073276104,0.00026495778,0.28923246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65660214,0.3327386,0.0002324534,0.0007942683,0.00012243041,0.000106196894,0.000024832396,0.00001279118,0.009366274],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801075,0.0010820129,0.00024652804,0.00017706282,0.00024985717,0.00023377432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994698,0.00012220228,0.000084692474,0.00008573598,0.00017628411,0.000061284714],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033967695,0.000055634548,0.0002557286,0.0000062979557,0.00029990802,0.00008449746,0.00018264084,0.00005368874,0.0020810014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002494467,0.000072175244,0.000061493934,0.00040203638,0.00013516548,0.00017389622,0.000036473888,0.00008970393,0.00016937088],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016683692,0.00008418491,0.80873096,0.00038420895,0.000021300335,0.000010480951,0.0046541616,1.6782682e-8,9.199959e-7,0.00027236648,0.082043014,0.10379671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006771146,0.000006237968,0.8575646,0.00067045627,0.000007183944,3.2456052e-7,0.00015242568,1.3840823e-7,1.9221285e-7,0.00014062137,0.14128715,0.000102926344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8043751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96059144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39746132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011961285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044956232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995503882","doi":"10.7202/019264ar","title":"Discursive Constructions of the Self in British Romanticism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Romanticism; Romance; Identity (music); Poetry; Face (sociological concept); Mode (computer interface); Literature; Self; Sociology; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; History; Epistemology; Art; Psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.017318879154970903,"score_gpt":0.2509928803101399,"score_spread":0.23367400115516898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995503882","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848648,0.00020134184,0.0000032262885,0.004983289,0.0010619954,0.00042920292,0.000016114105,0.000038055547,0.008402004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99805504,0.000784772,0.000059075483,0.0001584808,0.0002698842,0.0000147707215,7.528702e-7,0.000008030214,0.00064918323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986257,0.00024836187,0.00023791185,0.00019904695,0.00038993362,0.00029902707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992519,0.0003304138,0.00012027396,0.00017454341,0.00006436244,0.000058482285],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026498243,0.00011927354,0.00022641312,0.000021817119,0.0014320746,0.000048774808,0.00030839577,0.000096706164,0.00005867528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022362849,0.00007640413,0.00008478829,0.00027515265,0.0010362044,0.000108687986,0.0001000258,0.0002084333,0.000009438028],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020082114,0.0003026116,0.06738157,0.000032021904,0.00018652037,0.000052297262,0.30307457,0.000012002354,0.00064832426,0.6189262,0.0085631125,0.00080063846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008974665,0.00008410043,0.9103662,0.00020259175,0.00008074355,0.00003857643,0.035052974,0.000039219412,0.00035301692,0.00955411,0.042981233,0.0003498101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007458934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006231451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8429846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005655114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059552174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997622706","doi":"10.7202/043907ar","title":"Jupiter, Hercule et Minerve : trois modèles d’élaboration du droit des croyants par le juge étatique","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016418369234424607,"score_gpt":0.2683120482346693,"score_spread":0.25189367900024473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997622706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9503681,0.009600492,0.002953674,0.024580644,0.00046313397,0.00054126774,0.00011309803,0.00019488607,0.01118472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9432775,0.004918683,0.010677737,0.001508839,0.0010487015,0.00009938483,0.00004768837,0.00005914914,0.038362354],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99640805,0.00074532937,0.0005813582,0.0006128286,0.0005743429,0.0010780689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983243,0.00039081532,0.00030898442,0.00025480805,0.0003504572,0.0003706731],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010440199,0.00046262293,0.0005593777,0.00007536565,0.0019512025,0.0003385146,0.00047596137,0.00074760773,0.00023665828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007042112,0.000493428,0.00030916388,0.00068036164,0.0028897547,0.0013126436,0.00008493128,0.0007138479,0.00023252086],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115948395,0.0010251391,0.03581495,0.00035560658,0.0006595678,0.00011056871,0.45602003,0.0034823508,0.0042878794,0.37774014,0.01611767,0.104270145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005037145,0.00060104905,0.31151202,0.00087195414,0.00079358567,0.000064484666,0.108362556,0.010436837,0.008120591,0.104718655,0.44544286,0.004038232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038078446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08355044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4293252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003261882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024292037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997888101","doi":"10.4102/lit.v24i1.278","title":"Waardepeilings van die digkuns van C.M. van den Heever","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Literator","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poetry; Confessional; Transcendental number; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Style (visual arts); Literature; Quarter (Canadian coin); Theology; Art; Art history; History; Politics; Law; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.018395888167760978,"score_gpt":0.29392074007817465,"score_spread":0.27552485191041365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997888101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73024535,0.003074239,0.00010481522,0.0029335672,0.0012923131,0.00074283296,0.00004249373,0.00044048182,0.26112393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96991235,0.0001526398,0.0010221567,0.00082664005,0.00056862156,0.000041917665,0.0000066221482,0.000023815399,0.027445244],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785864,0.0002851532,0.00028617666,0.00039483266,0.0005173669,0.0006578214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990356,0.00016066595,0.00009725651,0.0002228548,0.00020011152,0.00028350722],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004500616,0.00023364718,0.0002840623,0.000034637942,0.0012191022,0.0003203364,0.00028972368,0.00015418332,0.0012133612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079149904,0.0001886117,0.00015711282,0.0002539317,0.00026502614,0.00047920353,0.00006374758,0.00021384636,0.0006596228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006680696,0.00062512286,0.15570514,0.00012115764,0.0006521965,0.000175168,0.6160212,0.000023367578,0.0029591941,0.15298219,0.039260548,0.0314079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003005566,0.000027197968,0.0031246801,0.00002655095,0.000029059413,6.441754e-7,0.0036229892,0.000003407947,0.000566389,0.0032641229,0.98871076,0.00032363317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062177726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008334758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9494502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023851622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007261076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998186628","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007250","title":"Aboriginal Governments and the<i>Charter</i>: Lessons from the United States","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Charter; Humanities; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023730508597716887,"score_gpt":0.2749457366745499,"score_spread":0.25121522807683305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998186628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6998735,0.033910573,0.000010794795,0.25811794,0.0018488332,0.0002989958,0.00071486016,0.0000069421217,0.005217553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92603713,0.04597517,0.000108302534,0.018556919,0.0012873559,0.000008842146,0.000015884052,0.000029934257,0.007980477],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973285,0.0005635664,0.0005417961,0.00029471563,0.00027765322,0.0009937562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962893,0.0013001403,0.0005013694,0.00019546591,0.00033350327,0.0013802354],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014273855,0.00033316654,0.00060187216,0.000018752002,0.0031493986,0.00043985364,0.0005295773,0.00026322255,0.0004174614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015693906,0.00023658718,0.00040068032,0.00033313577,0.005341871,0.00043889432,0.000030197423,0.0009618686,0.0000073169053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000912804,0.000015517857,0.0007954006,0.000030927786,0.0006710921,0.000066913664,0.51652944,0.000018996558,0.000001988902,0.45351556,0.02607729,0.0022677598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001540421,0.000061067265,0.00246094,0.00022993231,0.00039907132,0.00005604631,0.16670616,0.0005010061,8.9643606e-7,0.009357556,0.8183832,0.00030368785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8067452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89596134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79230595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014927433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030334035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998558287","doi":"10.3828/bjcs.19.2.12","title":"Human Rights, Culture and Everyday Lives","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Politics; Citizenship; Democracy; Immigration; Political science; Sociology; Identity politics; Indigenous; Political economy; Economic growth; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.023549705632268596,"score_gpt":0.2901029053085789,"score_spread":0.2665531996763103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998558287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.772211,0.14355592,6.3310694e-7,0.0040308624,0.000576688,0.0002048441,0.000034044657,0.000025833137,0.079360135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98392874,0.0054208315,0.00027948467,0.00013654237,0.0010360488,0.0000027770304,8.01703e-7,0.000006648026,0.009188133],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998723,0.00012918246,0.0003101168,0.000120865145,0.00034160246,0.00037524317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989088,0.00005369334,0.00017860458,0.00003522778,0.0005632184,0.0002604517],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040798896,0.00011451932,0.00032704585,0.00013789014,0.0030467995,0.00019279064,0.0001567407,0.000064859436,0.000038161466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019945,0.00010259248,0.0000932587,0.00026503063,0.00073656614,0.00031918372,0.00002767127,0.00021053277,0.0000036012143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051959573,0.00005033454,0.013080968,0.00004162584,0.00068016764,0.0018690028,0.054678723,0.0000059206436,0.000062457715,0.024698416,0.8977528,0.0070743975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031149373,0.000045427147,0.09175761,0.00020446809,0.00006381719,0.00016893043,0.027600449,6.5574724e-8,0.000010879363,0.0038213837,0.8758181,0.00019738333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7773001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97989416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2117177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003076967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008773152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999671988","doi":"10.3138/cjls.26.2.253","title":"How Jean-Guy Belley Thinks: A Translator's Note","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Multiculturalism; Cult; Law; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Formalism (music); Legal realism; Political science; Comparative law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.030960784218211065,"score_gpt":0.2633694446291456,"score_spread":0.2324086604109345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999671988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7775373,0.011593683,0.0003544881,0.066010885,0.00491409,0.001063845,0.00026241937,0.00009533452,0.13816796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896215,0.001250414,0.0012919791,0.0029825117,0.0007904473,0.000006706887,0.00000361784,0.000033462886,0.0040193405],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780947,0.00019443913,0.0004205802,0.00029121182,0.00021826068,0.0010660676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966077,0.00023448339,0.00033529737,0.00017125925,0.0004964352,0.0021548197],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013391974,0.0002787667,0.00057204964,0.000051584186,0.0021151607,0.0002550568,0.00049613224,0.00037198508,0.00018884118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035879167,0.0002702968,0.00056441844,0.00023458432,0.0013464655,0.0007269244,0.00002078203,0.00072491565,0.0000034296472],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070898664,0.000015751102,0.0005136244,0.00004822417,0.00022907711,0.00014675026,0.65506023,0.0000019457923,0.000029093524,0.33803228,0.003352741,0.0025631767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011228415,0.00019713628,0.002209836,0.00019858636,0.0002646953,0.000066919725,0.21128875,0.000022638153,0.000034055753,0.015031719,0.76882553,0.00073730096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4796898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.943493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76547277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011556085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011596942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999753978","doi":"10.5931/djim.v8i2.243","title":"Stillborn: Regulated midwifery in Nova Scotia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Statutory law; Nova (rocket); Political science; Focus (optics); Focus group; Obstetrics; Gynecology; Medicine; Sociology; Law; Ethnology; Engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.03096911979044573,"score_gpt":0.34047482602731716,"score_spread":0.3095057062368714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999753978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9211673,0.0012827711,0.00020880504,0.0077893506,0.0027043216,0.0004306588,0.0000031238958,0.000041343123,0.0663723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957597,0.00012364429,0.0014378552,0.00012861812,0.0007132128,0.0000030303443,0.0000017226619,0.000017289536,0.0018148989],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754447,0.0002563008,0.00073452387,0.00015981215,0.00069466874,0.00061024114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893945,0.000091443195,0.00041789468,0.0001657176,0.00016788443,0.0002176096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019125091,0.00020061767,0.0003954467,0.00027211747,0.00031928715,0.00007297363,0.00052195066,0.00009279441,0.00034228113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000077970515,0.00015713893,0.00019586534,0.00051365833,0.00025907054,0.0008529595,0.00080251973,0.0003243712,0.000108844186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018099676,0.003224068,0.20717312,0.0005295529,0.0022473966,0.0014788428,0.5364246,0.0015186036,0.00037993083,0.03129913,0.15493919,0.058975607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024446533,0.0004363495,0.7438011,0.001087171,0.00027651028,0.00005172473,0.19150093,0.000041134954,0.00014843719,0.001806873,0.057583414,0.0008217037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030093663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016950682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53662795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005741474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026024072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6407939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000235353","doi":"10.3828/bjcs.19.2.3","title":"Canadian Bijuralism: A Conversation of Cultures","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Legal culture; Acknowledgement; Denial; Space (punctuation); Sociology; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.027135842068425554,"score_gpt":0.2958954212728363,"score_spread":0.26875957920441074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000235353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86052614,0.056945466,0.0000015335289,0.03780087,0.0013735628,0.00036598087,0.00016684963,0.000018966532,0.04280062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99212885,0.005602713,0.00022260402,0.0002627181,0.00053767423,0.0000028409993,0.000002666536,0.0000072716557,0.0012326417],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984594,0.00013764373,0.00044229545,0.00009983443,0.0004202646,0.00044059075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787605,0.000085261585,0.00029700028,0.00004406052,0.0013004345,0.00039718233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005455801,0.0001053595,0.00036311796,0.00035088253,0.00090325123,0.00008928038,0.00021224486,0.000087234024,0.0000782463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000728539,0.000105963736,0.000138777,0.0005364832,0.0004898287,0.00029082075,0.0000125657425,0.00016039616,0.000005028491],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014101631,0.000035954832,0.03806099,0.00006604611,0.00084800116,0.0009960711,0.084973276,0.00008053575,0.00010366531,0.013519047,0.84606534,0.0152369505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005776525,0.00005462796,0.16113698,0.0003207315,0.00012192929,0.00011116448,0.12820071,8.382666e-7,0.00008517075,0.0015777423,0.7075143,0.0002981822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99808705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1385511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012576641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010275915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.694717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000251237","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2006.10.3.212","title":"<i>R</i> v <i>Henry</i> : A Welcome Retreat from an Overly Broad Interpretation of S. 13 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Statutory interpretation; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.03020607224087154,"score_gpt":0.31135709387155686,"score_spread":0.28115102163068534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000251237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98576486,0.0012587653,0.000032308977,0.010964774,0.00052129495,0.00019479876,0.000035922403,0.0000026576597,0.0012246468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991523,0.000073066345,0.00012252957,0.00013374438,0.0003283768,0.0000023026143,0.0000010622573,0.00000413655,0.00018250114],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799085,0.00022489663,0.00055573595,0.000101145146,0.0009962771,0.00013108163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975545,0.00036148145,0.00086942327,0.00012452733,0.0010260022,0.000064074855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077300606,0.00009742848,0.00023512065,0.00006276724,0.0001972013,0.000055532695,0.0008617291,0.000059270555,0.000058799495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036796925,0.000048502698,0.00013173543,0.00012617842,0.0007505421,0.00065039104,0.00006398821,0.0001676601,7.414035e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016623444,0.0006695493,0.56347364,0.0000972072,0.0017609308,0.000038363043,0.3017876,0.0011423036,0.061091937,0.029007228,0.013675422,0.025593478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015163367,0.0006196582,0.87880814,0.003461699,0.00036624016,0.00002915019,0.006798818,0.00070121075,0.031529274,0.06819762,0.0075716367,0.00040020683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6498553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6572653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31533453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021337265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020945095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35247633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000271173","doi":"10.7202/043859ar","title":"Changing Codes and Changing Constitutions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Parliament; Law; Legislature; Political science; Civil code; Harmonization","score_opus":0.016119675016936598,"score_gpt":0.2750217116239015,"score_spread":0.25890203660696487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000271173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9387499,0.0011371259,0.0032026814,0.005551422,0.00013350208,0.00022443869,0.000011712484,0.00019639285,0.050792832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898746,0.00031184763,0.0018310773,0.0005185956,0.0003936728,0.000019104376,0.0000025461948,0.000005495326,0.0070430497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990617,0.000053884465,0.00009066649,0.00014624647,0.00015691124,0.0004905758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996366,0.0001189108,0.000038108516,0.000054614542,0.000038212285,0.00011359244],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041555025,0.000086349464,0.00012324986,0.00007998652,0.0022157812,0.00007898032,0.000093605304,0.00011581046,0.000051557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023406795,0.00008433995,0.000044163146,0.0002548909,0.0011123833,0.00016926992,0.000037323538,0.0001645877,0.000023844477],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004062919,0.000019845791,0.0031362453,0.000015508398,0.000057980797,0.0000085898955,0.30778682,0.000056684294,0.00030483177,0.65163296,0.00039240535,0.03658408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081247924,0.000031781652,0.0069384538,0.00013936502,0.0001308087,0.000018946546,0.36896932,0.00082791504,0.0011086384,0.007047589,0.61312246,0.00085226615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068550155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017316977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6445854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063604146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029132361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000510276","doi":"10.1163/157181810x527996","title":"Children's Rights, Paternal Power and Fiduciary Duty: From Roman law to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Children s Rights","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Fiduciary; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Jurisdiction; Duty; Reservation of rights; Right to property; Human rights","score_opus":0.011617177820660875,"score_gpt":0.242039782195847,"score_spread":0.2304226043751861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000510276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98260015,0.00033900928,0.000011271897,0.009916809,0.001033681,0.00020641953,0.00010847705,0.000007646924,0.0057765325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99761486,0.00004288678,0.00017083838,0.0006762623,0.0011936196,0.0000018592567,0.0000045083925,0.000007189413,0.00028797792],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976214,0.00019581814,0.00046243268,0.00015140303,0.0013275992,0.00024131981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859196,0.00018436053,0.00043609546,0.00014732692,0.0004869688,0.0001533128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005706911,0.00016270006,0.0002510157,0.00003707264,0.00074986654,0.00008668865,0.001357777,0.000054599142,0.000440536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058727677,0.00007622294,0.00012056163,0.000070096736,0.0004025332,0.00025468564,0.00016398571,0.00027260717,0.000006226872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001329809,0.0007458702,0.28133118,0.000004088285,0.010223649,0.00017505145,0.26392034,0.00008756629,0.0004184407,0.23377262,0.20658746,0.001403929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006505015,0.0000913543,0.9464472,0.00009300398,0.00010570751,0.000053732896,0.0006711088,0.000002119204,0.0020118395,0.019152157,0.030503048,0.00021824679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87854314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78803545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.665116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018617326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015963076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5767443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001030104","doi":"10.1177/000842980203100231","title":"Towards an Ethics of Community: Negotiations of Difference in a Pluralist Society James H. Olthius, editor Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2000. ix + 226 p","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Law","score_opus":0.10671445348012082,"score_gpt":0.36641926540263936,"score_spread":0.25970481192251854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001030104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9547665,0.022085972,0.000008450753,0.01155765,0.0018236763,0.00072569837,0.000098572986,0.00012544433,0.00880801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8748845,0.12298939,0.00090697844,0.00022302088,0.00027116164,0.000016495731,0.000003606326,0.000009957524,0.00069488975],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99579746,0.001306768,0.0006794716,0.00040211034,0.0011734882,0.0006407284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967338,0.0016866368,0.00042372665,0.00037051353,0.00067526737,0.00011004471],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019413227,0.0002997437,0.000709181,0.00014021898,0.001952936,0.000057691388,0.0012923565,0.00030042787,0.0000132078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002914304,0.0002448032,0.00018995629,0.0014097657,0.007497597,0.0006495094,0.0006223487,0.0008551476,0.0000023829732],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030872998,0.00061011733,0.03437763,0.00028789914,0.00013772544,0.0000050741855,0.813438,0.00036536192,0.00021315318,0.013985334,0.13623852,0.00031029314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011881813,0.0006908159,0.024186948,0.00088860194,0.0001203349,0.0000013770389,0.8272836,0.00018150752,0.00072462496,0.0037576414,0.14005575,0.0009205847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20317043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059197515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14397292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005137857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041881794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003846455","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x12000219","title":"Relations of Freedom and Law's Relations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Centrality; Human sexuality; Constructive; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Epistemology; Economic Justice; Focus (optics); Independence (probability theory); Element (criminal law); Gender studies; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07818005685223442,"score_gpt":0.3462182411075495,"score_spread":0.2680381842553151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003846455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.369334,0.0019934757,0.000190786,0.003431393,0.00044882146,0.00022563974,0.000036157835,0.000068008856,0.6242717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99263376,0.000037437043,0.002055328,0.00009417823,0.0003495988,0.0000060945154,0.0000030708384,0.000005470014,0.004815073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992124,0.00007701193,0.0001394716,0.00007306659,0.0001935352,0.00030455034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943936,0.00019349981,0.00005222877,0.00007487734,0.00010030358,0.00013971033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020490661,0.000060762057,0.00009293368,0.000018434494,0.0007107745,0.000016105314,0.000057023102,0.00007434695,0.00019439764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002442343,0.00005394136,0.000037303624,0.00008508658,0.00053018134,0.00021554188,0.00004264387,0.000083679566,0.000057406432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.2302696e-7,0.000020733545,0.06894867,0.0000030955782,0.00002166314,4.996745e-8,0.052438457,0.0000057045404,0.000018859542,0.8769978,0.0015264859,0.00001820071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026825402,0.000011515973,0.5979771,0.000009956923,0.0001224015,9.388797e-7,0.04126764,0.000035283487,0.00005006273,0.030708529,0.32930177,0.000246547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075665275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005529164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84628934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000991705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003202284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004144292","doi":"10.7202/1026984ar","title":"Autorité parentale et patriarcat d’État au Canada","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.016467100027088264,"score_gpt":0.26094058232843126,"score_spread":0.244473482301343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004144292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77447665,0.0048788465,0.00008843456,0.06472541,0.007952768,0.0006337175,0.00018273221,0.0001502024,0.14691123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96022606,0.0010845462,0.00042884584,0.000967835,0.0035675517,0.0000428223,0.00003266627,0.00003548369,0.033614177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661726,0.00063837913,0.0004458402,0.0005164796,0.0005652134,0.001216829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982506,0.0005626922,0.00023978164,0.00031385577,0.00013952485,0.00049352477],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092063565,0.0002734946,0.00053952105,0.000025794881,0.0010040132,0.00010895702,0.00052064646,0.00028088066,0.0004387614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072670664,0.00036884443,0.00023285046,0.00041517598,0.0005261503,0.00029622868,0.00016273596,0.00046471256,0.00025698487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004520408,0.00042394715,0.2281367,0.0011582815,0.00050380704,0.00021038015,0.08984366,0.0007356403,0.00023805711,0.48609173,0.10251208,0.09010052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006060112,0.000081813734,0.07036457,0.00033386954,0.00015364212,0.000019875148,0.006880922,0.00062330597,0.00008782423,0.008533891,0.9115434,0.0007708556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.956881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97308886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80903137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005016085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010409366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006710169","doi":"10.1007/s10566-009-9089-3","title":"Processes of Discernment when Considering Issues of Neglect in Child Protection Practice","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Child & Youth Care Forum","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Discernment; Neglect; Negotiation; Identity (music); Narrative; Psychology; Social psychology; Child protection; Sociology; Epistemology; Medicine; Nursing; Aesthetics; Social science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.021929645524282046,"score_gpt":0.29880630822512816,"score_spread":0.2768766627008461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006710169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7278642,0.024433713,0.00007850312,0.08777764,0.0005655902,0.004263479,0.00009394682,0.00024651314,0.15467644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989392,0.0004269352,0.00030370697,0.00013710458,0.00011081881,0.000018785193,0.000005035504,0.000007475999,0.000050901865],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985874,0.00011162192,0.0003060294,0.00021891705,0.00047060545,0.00030540256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992427,0.00005470081,0.00026454712,0.00011409415,0.00027591555,0.00004804901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001762341,0.00013851872,0.0002765136,0.000046636967,0.00041056908,0.000030465695,0.0001562936,0.000082772785,0.000014770334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014927492,0.00011470481,0.00006885373,0.0002737984,0.00018722445,0.00036119408,0.000051321196,0.00017786292,0.0000019158274],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010819865,0.00021223552,0.010464223,0.0002509289,0.00006117813,0.000003352985,0.97840255,0.000080634585,0.00015038117,0.001287989,0.00013863145,0.008839684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006412695,0.00034407675,0.019474776,0.0009713231,0.00007798201,0.000002606392,0.95164984,0.000002624147,0.00915177,0.0004124185,0.016956793,0.0003144979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01126081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062263054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27107507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020100165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059521095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W200684408","doi":"","title":"Reconciliation and the Supreme Court: The Opposing Views of Chief Justices Lamer and McLachlin","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Dissent; Law; Political science; Constitution; Economic Justice; Sovereignty; Negotiation; Treaty; Majority opinion; Politics","score_opus":0.06383653880782145,"score_gpt":0.3268023272790587,"score_spread":0.2629657884712373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W200684408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84963465,0.00576381,0.000057385645,0.026349893,0.00020746024,0.000685871,0.0000025703448,0.00002758113,0.117270805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99558866,0.0019649994,0.00030571583,0.00034183232,0.000056778394,0.000009902644,2.5360464e-7,0.0000024680471,0.0017293766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990037,0.00042797945,0.00015074783,0.00010192554,0.00018657398,0.00012906466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909127,0.0006443384,0.000092235714,0.00006202142,0.00008115602,0.000029001705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014735481,0.00006555567,0.00013238893,0.000006571545,0.00088685576,0.000071008355,0.00007763766,0.00003849764,0.00009568378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009016737,0.000028246588,0.000028113624,0.00008596293,0.0009105837,0.0001300271,0.000026038339,0.00006951103,0.0000027629646],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057712983,0.000051986284,0.03313869,0.000074563715,0.00016932876,4.177373e-7,0.43552107,0.000012803807,0.0006916488,0.49504226,0.005048558,0.030190967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028148713,0.00007950387,0.10900703,0.00008952569,0.00043252966,0.0000028492566,0.40661588,0.00065278803,0.0011538411,0.0072347275,0.47142196,0.00049450784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048769363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077142725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48780754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022705637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018681443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73725015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007883823","doi":"10.1590/s0102-71822007000300007","title":"Cuando la comunidad guía la acción: hacia una evaluación comunitaria alternativa","year":2007,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Psicologia & Sociedade","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0415173431423895,"score_gpt":0.3958454968028396,"score_spread":0.3543281536604501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007883823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7966895,0.002520754,0.00010747436,0.011613906,0.001669311,0.0014693271,0.00007779822,0.0005130121,0.18533891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888569,0.003506568,0.0011932361,0.000970074,0.001216447,0.00008118544,0.00003302861,0.00007650103,0.0040660477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99180996,0.0025947897,0.0010558075,0.0009811461,0.0015657763,0.0019925085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99180454,0.0056982073,0.0007673333,0.0006042143,0.00057622266,0.0005494687],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006612534,0.0008988416,0.0011819862,0.00012117103,0.0034831807,0.00095331605,0.001890327,0.0013229524,0.00082394097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022176197,0.0007733299,0.00070537365,0.00111716,0.0037292335,0.0005901364,0.0009911689,0.0019126836,0.00062803074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004490409,0.0024574816,0.30879351,0.00037265648,0.002399157,0.00037223753,0.15600196,0.00008981058,0.003231577,0.39916494,0.0998536,0.026814003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003953381,0.0003399536,0.5262609,0.0003165517,0.0005774615,0.000013944999,0.05465729,0.00027504808,0.00054364593,0.0051187365,0.4061837,0.0017593896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007093769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012532888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39404622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015048687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003615994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009546468","doi":"10.7202/037456ar","title":"La contractualisation du mariage : réflexions sur les fonctions du Code civil du Québec dans la famille","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013862957462075394,"score_gpt":0.24374287799460762,"score_spread":0.22987992053253223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009546468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7903166,0.002395404,0.004110692,0.0921655,0.0007367564,0.00047258032,0.00015804663,0.00027978251,0.109364636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97821397,0.0029279604,0.00028578937,0.0015104046,0.0009085861,0.00004913626,0.000036555113,0.000030624284,0.016036972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684775,0.0010425943,0.00046035755,0.0004525772,0.00048395398,0.00071277615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99694103,0.002042142,0.00025644552,0.00021589063,0.00024781202,0.0002967057],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010349021,0.00036742957,0.0004520247,0.00006040616,0.0030250836,0.0002468805,0.00038882808,0.00077959994,0.0005375387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021117495,0.0003730424,0.00034297787,0.0004297494,0.0031240936,0.0005243954,0.00005545159,0.00080083346,0.00010177153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005155794,0.0005006649,0.014556608,0.000038871476,0.00029209454,0.00010730642,0.31962946,0.0003005945,0.00073556264,0.60873693,0.018707478,0.036342863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010841418,0.00012329555,0.17257695,0.00009841818,0.00037013623,0.00005081105,0.12614645,0.0009472316,0.00007504117,0.009017146,0.6888144,0.00069598004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25286573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49607483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67010695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040402543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041659258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009924126","doi":"10.7202/042618ar","title":"Remarques sur le nouveau droit de la famille et le droit des successions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Political science; Scope (computer science); Code (set theory); Event (particle physics); Humanities; Welfare economics; Law; Computer science; Philosophy; Economics; Physics; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.01412121617965344,"score_gpt":0.28359589144621367,"score_spread":0.2694746752665602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009924126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.865493,0.00097628427,0.0013803019,0.0055468497,0.00010677287,0.0002789378,0.000020907153,0.00035049958,0.12584646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96771425,0.0011929024,0.0060026213,0.00082725607,0.00032121342,0.000057812696,0.000012400435,0.000037620506,0.023833912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974221,0.00052639353,0.00030800447,0.0003945348,0.0004625967,0.0008863817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985124,0.000643447,0.0001388832,0.00022509195,0.00014928987,0.00033090927],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013680364,0.00024428742,0.00035444368,0.00007273477,0.0025103982,0.00024760357,0.0005432615,0.00046138864,0.00010315392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012411757,0.00024987245,0.00022464035,0.0003738155,0.0021640796,0.0006083681,0.0001062554,0.0006228277,0.0000561546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061210856,0.0006131683,0.029815422,0.00008426441,0.00027239806,0.00007666388,0.24123871,0.00048549316,0.0036723,0.66131574,0.017703127,0.04466152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002363827,0.00011031676,0.17026778,0.00027318407,0.00014405568,0.000027538365,0.129161,0.00055123225,0.0036236085,0.12612735,0.5656738,0.0016762774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06615767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051242393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5479707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023187026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044286685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011029261","doi":"10.1108/cgij-05-2014-0020","title":"Freedom of choice requires availability of choice options","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Governance An International Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Limiting; Statutory law; Corporate governance; Value (mathematics); Abortion law; Political science; Business; Law; Actuarial science; Law and economics; Economics; Family planning; Medicine; Population; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.09010935566680336,"score_gpt":0.44202132777318615,"score_spread":0.3519119721063828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011029261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97911435,0.00020361162,0.00026251606,0.0052184523,0.0030217997,0.00011983793,0.000051392723,0.000023657098,0.011984391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917906,0.001674397,0.0019776104,0.00023049091,0.003520838,0.0000035441653,0.000002799552,0.000007972607,0.0007917449],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996657,0.00057114114,0.0011362588,0.0002457876,0.0011561287,0.00023365274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994998,0.001930051,0.0012830104,0.00020651477,0.0013810648,0.0002013649],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026136213,0.000120148004,0.0003654169,0.000023452218,0.0002940951,0.00007361192,0.0011380948,0.00014334441,0.0005728944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020404719,0.00009932223,0.0003259175,0.00012451441,0.0012779532,0.00082907383,0.0001346542,0.0004249416,0.000024408078],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098755736,0.0007641232,0.89491767,0.000012495363,0.0002165259,0.00000224695,0.0023518677,0.00014975258,0.00033488928,0.07771566,0.0051377467,0.0182983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072372623,0.00016050269,0.853855,0.00009171708,0.00002647558,0.0000017349397,0.0004990522,0.000101394064,0.000053817297,0.0017346526,0.14262971,0.00012217747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051567997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00405708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13749197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002110965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001727878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98784685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011344008","doi":"10.7202/042436ar","title":"Les lignes de force de la Loi 89 instituant un nouveau Code civil et portant réforme du droit de la famille","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Legislation; Balance (ability); Political science; Law; Order (exchange); Flexibility (engineering); Code (set theory); Civil code; Gender equality; Intervention (counseling); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Gender studies; Business","score_opus":0.009897689320448926,"score_gpt":0.2739895230547965,"score_spread":0.2640918337343476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011344008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9021719,0.0007500465,0.0025675292,0.0024666092,0.00008761585,0.00029037488,0.000036849317,0.0002627499,0.09136632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98670614,0.0023669377,0.0046487134,0.0015505549,0.0004066162,0.00006897413,0.000011170613,0.000040244835,0.004200651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720955,0.00049984735,0.0003590527,0.0003781863,0.00048396623,0.0010694169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982847,0.00086589676,0.00018692852,0.00019639045,0.00009596446,0.0003701141],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002018302,0.00030639002,0.00038894668,0.00006758876,0.0016825803,0.00022677273,0.0005466235,0.00063014537,0.00012041028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012537391,0.0002920237,0.00023260845,0.00028580916,0.0017663102,0.0003280947,0.000101953534,0.00068397576,0.000031696316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010079656,0.00037328203,0.08739998,0.000102864076,0.00038637835,0.00032761192,0.42916742,0.0013870094,0.005541751,0.4444433,0.00529269,0.025476933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025420412,0.0001850726,0.17194276,0.0002713927,0.0003665254,0.00018339766,0.13064797,0.002164548,0.0062955525,0.047634363,0.63577205,0.0019943395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021340422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04454073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63047934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041810335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042423644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011373185","doi":"10.1017/s0036930609004748","title":"<i>Crux et Vocatio</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scottish Journal of Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Regional Municipality of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Glory; Theology; Explication; Existentialism; Relation (database); Philosophy; Power (physics); Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02512801277923531,"score_gpt":0.34125849201204367,"score_spread":0.31613047923280835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011373185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35663143,0.007733121,0.0007259503,0.19104953,0.0032854648,0.00033434207,0.000004802305,0.00008539605,0.44014996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915961,0.0010053705,0.0015170044,0.0030036673,0.0005507687,6.45809e-7,3.5275963e-7,0.0000038010824,0.0023222885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861765,0.00043135355,0.00030234258,0.000088578025,0.00028897243,0.00027109226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990154,0.0001929068,0.00031157507,0.00007286212,0.00029847518,0.00010881966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012542084,0.00008351734,0.00024745113,0.000036980015,0.00037724854,0.00005227833,0.00036880316,0.00009599612,0.00025590218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008936738,0.00006326901,0.00012312323,0.00014223716,0.00035974616,0.00027297303,0.00002739313,0.00025550678,0.000034434088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016158186,0.00033357745,0.00795131,0.000008967116,0.00026716042,0.00016227578,0.06483435,0.000082937106,0.0015400767,0.6105722,0.23984812,0.074237406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017181641,0.0010102013,0.110825285,0.00012467624,0.00014209717,0.00023875579,0.013002752,0.0000047273365,0.0005813147,0.31567645,0.5561577,0.0005178762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040954925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051706913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63496464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009105819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011118577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29015288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012150543","doi":"10.7202/1027846ar","title":"No Middle Ground: Ad Medium Filum Aquae, Aboriginal Fishing Rights, and the Supreme Court of Canada's Decisions in Nikal and Lewis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Fishing","score_opus":0.014964504969565811,"score_gpt":0.2531205142691949,"score_spread":0.2381560092996291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012150543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97454846,0.0006917186,0.000018590226,0.009453475,0.00024820588,0.0002939286,0.000023040395,0.000017072658,0.01470553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962784,0.0004951163,0.0004753834,0.00016160132,0.0002478532,0.000019149438,0.000003609827,0.0000071282943,0.0023117657],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985026,0.00023404829,0.00027194925,0.0002270387,0.00036011613,0.0004042355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983733,0.0011315886,0.0001149128,0.00013780617,0.000111870526,0.00013052061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011004923,0.0001058749,0.00033124388,0.000028157603,0.0006246645,0.00007727051,0.00025612317,0.00009352698,0.000031477026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009654524,0.000092895636,0.000045394216,0.00016724489,0.0005930592,0.00017296388,0.00006325907,0.00021246959,0.0000025549748],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006380062,0.00033448942,0.3742582,0.0005132292,0.0004572648,0.0001406247,0.2919771,0.00011636498,0.000782268,0.23644546,0.08246091,0.011876083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029219764,0.000082787796,0.50481427,0.00052894105,0.00010721302,0.00001802393,0.009692032,0.0014608798,0.00007222108,0.036626294,0.44305572,0.0006196499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7836857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.950583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3605948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029542012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016885599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48044774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014540562","doi":"10.7202/043889ar","title":"La nature des fictions juridiques au sein du nouveau mode de filiation unisexuée au Québec; un retour aux sources ?","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.013116298934180301,"score_gpt":0.2826642674253672,"score_spread":0.2695479684911869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014540562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9175724,0.0048197666,0.0014062497,0.058769394,0.0004148136,0.00028575255,0.000068452755,0.00025796224,0.016405253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9597965,0.0020264229,0.0035308944,0.0009309604,0.0020561612,0.000056081986,0.000022485996,0.00004228792,0.031538196],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968465,0.0007455142,0.0003944361,0.0004671568,0.0004704525,0.001075973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982702,0.00065963797,0.00023978925,0.00021664129,0.00023741531,0.00037629326],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008480362,0.00038677314,0.00038439903,0.00007808696,0.0043058125,0.00019181203,0.0004619897,0.001390559,0.00014545975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011021775,0.0003920856,0.00030134112,0.00052874035,0.0029334463,0.00064039836,0.000083867315,0.0014414494,0.000064401356],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005907589,0.00028637718,0.056992512,0.00014799787,0.00041962366,0.000032143686,0.7223199,0.0065704994,0.00034209611,0.14684166,0.00794189,0.058046244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082148204,0.00016235346,0.13813776,0.00031476948,0.0005303915,0.000035643927,0.12385625,0.0062938347,0.0013115462,0.02311523,0.7041602,0.0012605258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50197613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5849104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6962183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016660864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016597131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015038629","doi":"10.7202/006012ar","title":"Not \"Forsworn with Pink Ribbons\": Hannah More, Thomas De Quincey, and the Literature of Power","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism on the Net","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Romance; Ballad; Power (physics); Literature; Philosophy; Covert; Sect; Nationalism; Politics; Religious studies; Art; Theology; Law; Poetry","score_opus":0.012852562534627451,"score_gpt":0.2735440782376118,"score_spread":0.2606915157029843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015038629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8524019,0.0013150873,0.000018025474,0.1222679,0.00010598514,0.00060770044,0.000013137178,0.00006048941,0.023209786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937847,0.00030060182,0.00019731354,0.0034874398,0.000121198726,0.000010960105,0.0000012202338,0.000007276345,0.002089265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986008,0.0002731436,0.00016021097,0.00018303473,0.00043917669,0.0003436455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990487,0.00045622376,0.00012249521,0.00021547446,0.000091249014,0.00006582762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074370595,0.00016087714,0.00024930734,0.000020611687,0.0008011006,0.0001319812,0.00033545267,0.00009214241,0.000023125405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002726185,0.000067385976,0.000075907636,0.0002611021,0.0010450896,0.00010407428,0.000047118177,0.00024354953,0.0000052058695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008023763,0.00016115788,0.001647426,0.00002004777,0.00019202604,0.000027989789,0.35915905,0.000034395038,0.00055149995,0.60735685,0.027911097,0.0021360978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0077265436,0.0016056634,0.6363932,0.0017833726,0.00056118553,0.000041127907,0.07569982,0.0006019956,0.0042297496,0.057260837,0.21239567,0.001700839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064894854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025672122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6347458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036472433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029456269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6161499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015075908","doi":"10.7202/1027764ar","title":"Loi sur les biens matrimoniaux : restrictive à juste titre ou démesurément étroite ? Un examen de l’application limitée de la loi avec un coup d’oeil de biais à la décision M. c. H.","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019418726437855683,"score_gpt":0.27214391658686465,"score_spread":0.25272519014900896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015075908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95628846,0.004770265,0.0044937837,0.011774397,0.0002710315,0.0009614946,0.00009342038,0.00024165552,0.021105474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703302,0.012525667,0.006828285,0.00029108135,0.0010574056,0.00019923571,0.000032415748,0.00008225464,0.008653457],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943832,0.0018874564,0.000693682,0.0008660199,0.00064568245,0.0015239479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957468,0.0022348398,0.0005600002,0.000523409,0.0003426425,0.00059234485],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034107736,0.00046878154,0.0007068458,0.00012986954,0.0012200936,0.0003016638,0.00075831695,0.0008694905,0.00009419932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013648869,0.0005839313,0.0003872371,0.00095454033,0.00089007785,0.0003563086,0.00027970417,0.0008210413,0.00023690573],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026872024,0.0015665194,0.17493977,0.00089788553,0.0007529047,0.00026498007,0.103104055,0.0035344937,0.008546082,0.0992979,0.008113283,0.5987134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028413096,0.00045950344,0.5522834,0.0012808234,0.001110069,0.00018173685,0.010587256,0.027184041,0.0031841137,0.04294073,0.35595804,0.001988944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018066822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022683574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59672445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003768835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004370607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015589168","doi":"10.3138/utq.82.4.864","title":"‘A More Exact Purity’: Legal Authority and Conspicuous Amalgamation in Early Modern English Law Guides and the Oxford Law Lectures of Sir Robert Chambers and Samuel Johnson","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Legitimacy; Law; Perspective (graphical); Vocabulary; Sociology; Political science; Literature; Philosophy; Art; Linguistics; Visual arts","score_opus":0.008730402287007074,"score_gpt":0.22854771537416432,"score_spread":0.21981731308715724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015589168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9878699,0.0014240056,0.00002291211,0.0011959383,0.000047739883,0.00043721095,0.000009346361,0.00002404952,0.008968856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907863,0.00033861268,0.0003262779,0.000038399918,0.000025886497,9.900326e-7,0.0000014331642,0.0000034043378,0.00018635421],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990546,0.00020438102,0.00014682717,0.00018903299,0.00021719602,0.0001879242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936867,0.00017857846,0.0001034459,0.00008917524,0.00018196215,0.000078178346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028456948,0.00011899462,0.00028028514,0.0000117112795,0.000570846,0.00009304524,0.0001284558,0.00011406261,0.000027599383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004975375,0.00009751385,0.00004461808,0.00003183628,0.0020967138,0.0010016697,0.000045988716,0.00009592619,2.1290121e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012464836,0.00004468249,0.008155816,0.000057778794,0.000076788754,0.0000025770862,0.9026728,0.000004452465,0.00012840822,0.0783092,0.00016921104,0.010253618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004708674,0.0006386135,0.6343367,0.00012835937,0.00015724766,0.000002018004,0.32454705,0.0014496193,0.00004961789,0.004644964,0.028785806,0.0005513189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87216324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5922279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6261809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000118998476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019573037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77254295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021030357","doi":"10.1111/heyj.12249_44","title":"Justice: The Biblical Challenge <i>(Biblical Challenges in the Contemporary World)</i>. By Walter J.Houston. Pp 150, London, Equinox, 2010, £15.99.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Heythrop Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"SAINT; Equinox; Economic Justice; Citation; Theology; Philosophy; Classics; Media studies; Sociology; History; Library science; Art history; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.24689575202953543,"score_gpt":0.38396757177454516,"score_spread":0.13707181974500973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021030357","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043929126,0.20924062,0.000027797507,0.6694074,0.0026829299,0.0010806627,0.000016898455,0.0001337605,0.073480785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93814594,0.05168375,0.000038537586,0.0036111535,0.0039145653,0.00007625772,0.0000030658555,0.000043086962,0.0024836522],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927267,0.0029056377,0.00075928913,0.0004081173,0.0020833332,0.001116956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99678695,0.0014085034,0.0004040798,0.000530671,0.0004406749,0.0004291022],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008026376,0.00041821954,0.0005281542,0.0002146892,0.003056165,0.00068865507,0.0021595596,0.00022950805,0.00028211164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091683416,0.00018016499,0.00027224005,0.0017117367,0.0022015958,0.000712343,0.00038054044,0.0021424668,0.0002965952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012059561,0.00028081067,0.00044035938,0.00001769364,0.000102896665,0.00007235765,0.084925376,0.00000968124,0.000023737724,0.008629398,0.90142703,0.0039500655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011743694,0.00021053173,0.001811479,0.00007130932,0.0001002987,0.0001092711,0.11740332,0.000038018832,0.000012086894,0.0035340912,0.87517244,0.0003627703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023741014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004219487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8942168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032572701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031547403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021608390","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.2.070812ra","title":"RELATIONAL AUTONOMY AND INDIVIDUALITY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Individualism; Independence (probability theory); Relational theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03045350251775319,"score_gpt":0.2505324012269758,"score_spread":0.2200788987092226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021608390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50912654,0.00079437625,0.00013447767,0.005789096,0.00017504033,0.00017265392,0.0000063643674,0.00002664828,0.48377478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99327105,0.00020685195,0.0036801454,0.000038866525,0.0000876988,4.7835652e-8,6.061794e-7,0.0000012954113,0.0027134286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994218,0.000106819054,0.00007179347,0.000064286534,0.00021494609,0.000120375065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999532,0.00006357411,0.000098541,0.000030007855,0.00016117876,0.0001146912],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002558515,0.000043129272,0.000088779045,0.0000045125553,0.0014974761,0.000035225625,0.00011224914,0.00005063216,0.0030949393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034739376,0.000041387015,0.000043697495,0.00001273058,0.00045105864,0.0008946535,0.000056402998,0.00008447061,0.000013022066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016410318,0.00007541967,0.07594545,0.00000967808,0.00021414486,0.0000063293205,0.19895153,0.000007797388,0.00005705752,0.7019017,0.0088717025,0.01394281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035781146,0.000021828308,0.4760073,0.000012025637,0.0000237225,0.0000022806537,0.048754416,0.000008838688,0.000002288091,0.0016833091,0.47303283,0.00009335058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3403237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11609381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7002184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039859442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005316976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023640790","doi":"10.3138/ecf.20.2.264","title":"Paula R. Backscheider and Catherine Ingrassia, eds.  <i>A Companion to the Eighteenth-Century English Novel and Culture</i>. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005. xiii+550pp. US$162.95. ISBN 978-1-4051-0157-8.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Art history","score_opus":0.014054145973887109,"score_gpt":0.26218578237269496,"score_spread":0.24813163639880786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023640790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.807638,0.14008301,0.0013400471,0.007822557,0.0103100855,0.0048987283,0.00024035513,0.0009776043,0.026689643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7725179,0.2198614,0.0014733642,0.0011240997,0.0035771746,0.000077667966,0.00013413434,0.00008463483,0.0011496289],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99505484,0.0003187733,0.0008519874,0.0010844524,0.0012395103,0.0014504148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997585,0.00031001016,0.00042275875,0.00046733397,0.0005046505,0.0007102188],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017429239,0.0007221755,0.0006387387,0.00012782088,0.003003781,0.0005556162,0.0005319464,0.00048603665,0.00025409964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000350215,0.0005229823,0.00022921179,0.00076013996,0.0007195119,0.0009199594,0.00042621474,0.00079129485,0.00006502398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005900786,0.0017660308,0.057997644,0.00021780007,0.00079526694,0.00003250526,0.11267466,0.00008616471,0.005896733,0.014766039,0.7727345,0.03244256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012389561,0.00011885794,0.03745987,0.000087214816,0.00014547634,0.000008635057,0.011948311,0.000076276556,0.00030834612,0.000017713468,0.9478938,0.00069653883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036672764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037748963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17515929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005990639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006654415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024212870","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0312","title":"When tribalism meets liberalism: Human rights and Indigenous boundary problems in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Democracy; Indigenous; Political science; Law; Tribalism; Citizenship; Human rights; Liberal democracy; Sociology; Politics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.010950430013658355,"score_gpt":0.2184607752053984,"score_spread":0.20751034519174003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024212870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9428781,0.0009115133,0.000006630627,0.0012970059,0.00018470721,0.00016348109,0.000007726551,0.000011507664,0.054539323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983747,0.000096553405,0.00027855433,0.00004995019,0.00009549564,7.067936e-8,0.000001219316,0.000002861765,0.0011005959],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888,0.00023506196,0.00013659957,0.00011836728,0.00035561202,0.00027433125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999463,0.000050705898,0.0001494635,0.000056323694,0.00010836428,0.00017214712],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003838685,0.00008825685,0.00021259331,0.0000116507,0.0027057054,0.000052253585,0.00025344416,0.0000612624,0.00028077138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012295507,0.00008292215,0.000041598287,0.000021488133,0.00033095133,0.0004990619,0.0000628271,0.00014597128,6.362823e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050506776,0.00012703476,0.037291974,0.00004972841,0.00023385609,0.00012759591,0.8882481,0.000043970802,0.000104352584,0.056080323,0.013930008,0.003712549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010505634,0.000063501524,0.045308907,0.00006410759,0.000031356005,0.0000063461375,0.02102095,0.000005454415,0.000007596539,0.0035406952,0.9286921,0.00020843567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9147621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001956272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019710575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024683456","doi":"10.7202/043637ar","title":"L'influence des traités internationaux des droits de la personne sur le droit fédéral australien","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.019486313599725677,"score_gpt":0.2831399428494802,"score_spread":0.2636536292497545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024683456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.972131,0.0036907683,0.0006372162,0.0050896155,0.0002133402,0.00032812345,0.00006262162,0.00018701328,0.017660288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9134452,0.0011435173,0.0070713656,0.00046514953,0.0007700984,0.00005074142,0.000009821598,0.000045818622,0.07699834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99629277,0.000596957,0.00046778045,0.0005756109,0.00063831464,0.0014285387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981292,0.000667352,0.00021430112,0.00019646456,0.00028096305,0.0005117074],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012970172,0.00043066815,0.0004589713,0.00008677798,0.0020113685,0.00034204943,0.0008107846,0.0007577621,0.00034226454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011822653,0.00048798043,0.00035607227,0.0005541115,0.00870195,0.0012588393,0.00009870029,0.0009599185,0.0001824079],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064633816,0.0005286331,0.039624557,0.00021868804,0.00048816603,0.0001573814,0.40147316,0.00696571,0.0024622031,0.43705833,0.0018284864,0.10913004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029687257,0.00027906036,0.6136354,0.0007983965,0.0004464792,0.00029326338,0.09502179,0.0030426786,0.0030874747,0.13768509,0.14045179,0.0022898319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05577899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021493642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57401085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070783575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029114544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W202561496","doi":"","title":"R. v. Kapp: Aboriginal Fishing, Andrews and Affirmative Action in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Supreme court; Law; Fishing; Political science; Action (physics); Physics","score_opus":0.024691001684359223,"score_gpt":0.2996355685379767,"score_spread":0.27494456685361746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W202561496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90727675,0.0007100459,0.00044613655,0.0495238,0.00020205422,0.0005002019,0.000052885072,0.000022931466,0.041265223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988001,0.00027044825,0.00021343504,0.00029689353,0.00013523074,0.000012139472,0.000008303349,0.0000010342116,0.00026240828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911237,0.0001124691,0.00016867906,0.000108349086,0.00033902895,0.00015909031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935013,0.00025573143,0.00010013883,0.000045978504,0.00020760453,0.000040424995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005934087,0.0000629137,0.000112113456,0.000033291966,0.00051831955,0.000034141736,0.00012016456,0.000055265155,0.000016553264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006064408,0.000055625365,0.000023338922,0.00022836891,0.0002868537,0.0002474562,0.0000051517945,0.00013184428,9.617726e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000146624325,0.00007102188,0.012360368,0.000024209052,0.000021403588,0.000009094478,0.03309243,0.00059254654,0.00013011607,0.9440681,0.008163509,0.0014525633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092841237,0.00003808965,0.69696474,0.00016255943,0.00004080875,0.000031649186,0.03672913,0.00091155234,0.00011552498,0.020014472,0.24374923,0.00031383883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15781663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64199126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9240536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007223059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078514527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84779155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026014252","doi":"10.1177/0008429814526145","title":"“He thinks he’s failed”","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Mennonite University","funders":"","keywords":"Christian ministry; Plural; Faith; History; Religious studies; Literature; Political science; Law; Theology; Sociology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07419605902992657,"score_gpt":0.39707218224862184,"score_spread":0.3228761232186953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026014252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44276407,0.07298067,0.00006356241,0.053000495,0.006547163,0.0016186604,0.000010499145,0.0011066925,0.42190817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9166755,0.077541694,0.0013872671,0.0014183226,0.0006901145,0.00013269263,0.0000011581341,0.000020114296,0.002133131],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99517035,0.00060880254,0.00068972725,0.00090732373,0.001425827,0.0011979616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99705684,0.0017457998,0.00027543792,0.0003623849,0.00037914325,0.00018041802],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027287463,0.0004109483,0.0006869195,0.00021591329,0.0031699378,0.00022621412,0.0012357237,0.00022159996,0.00004043874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006875713,0.00030088154,0.00020041433,0.0015799999,0.0053678122,0.00057169143,0.0005901999,0.00040145457,0.00023866504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033287648,0.00016108087,0.08829128,0.00010971827,0.0002411028,0.000024120645,0.09943989,0.0003565582,0.00010362088,0.20429108,0.6047662,0.0021820585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005892772,0.00029431822,0.011539322,0.0003524595,0.00007133289,0.0000029440778,0.08243639,0.000050937477,0.00018197116,0.03888595,0.8646203,0.0009747827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016574817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018444879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4739114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041976935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026391554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026527854","doi":"10.7202/043828ar","title":"Codes et codifications : dialogue avec la common law ?","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022256679555304835,"score_gpt":0.2953366754184335,"score_spread":0.27307999586312864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026527854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54116917,0.007849905,0.0009327999,0.12560858,0.00074068183,0.0005769109,0.00029595825,0.00027893632,0.32254705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9395964,0.0023522538,0.0023085568,0.0030038757,0.0006250956,0.000056516415,0.000046672798,0.000024688632,0.051985905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975308,0.0007840596,0.0003278923,0.00032959838,0.000368762,0.00065884937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982785,0.0009794106,0.00015561823,0.00022394136,0.000103547995,0.00025896027],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008677627,0.00024708407,0.00035587102,0.000028127786,0.0016272386,0.00019372639,0.00041417437,0.0005497917,0.00025433153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022582075,0.00025659776,0.00020339001,0.0003190723,0.0044875736,0.00037106892,0.00006331537,0.000771914,0.00045765884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006286577,0.00013048468,0.00080778945,0.000022923117,0.00008748802,0.000009318805,0.123477824,0.00014589806,0.000077718476,0.85238576,0.0054779667,0.017370565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003412229,0.000029937652,0.00994868,0.00006230862,0.00012633212,0.000008286624,0.011411727,0.00025018354,0.00015152675,0.024896488,0.95237136,0.000401958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021031508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08318162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9468934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018854262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007721121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027318412","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2002.17806","title":"Le partenariat civil, d'un continent à l'autre","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; General partnership; Art; Law","score_opus":0.03769913312653062,"score_gpt":0.2679104109691336,"score_spread":0.23021127784260298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027318412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43179196,0.03290138,0.0008510926,0.2800048,0.004977564,0.0006753639,0.00013366135,0.00023471702,0.24842948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84284234,0.00400798,0.0005571896,0.0005270747,0.0017615298,0.000057415036,0.00001871034,0.00002312358,0.15020463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757713,0.0002594461,0.0005338236,0.0004401582,0.0005363455,0.000653071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847853,0.00043365036,0.00030527482,0.0002055275,0.00032807386,0.00024894386],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036329296,0.00026612933,0.0004456187,0.000056803052,0.00065233605,0.0001799782,0.0006381322,0.00018809142,0.0040671704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003291793,0.00031394543,0.00032389566,0.00027637987,0.00054064055,0.00037355736,0.00015370821,0.00035974162,0.0018219445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015734584,0.0011101468,0.023029989,0.00012217769,0.0007430644,0.000132775,0.032561496,0.00093812076,0.00010665316,0.8123056,0.10212374,0.026810499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007656849,0.000040020637,0.017265348,0.0003201339,0.00008211329,0.000037875634,0.0023752272,0.016605254,0.000080590624,0.0067458414,0.95523286,0.00044905386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007813163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061903433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8531091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008516328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000493712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030102691","doi":"10.3138/utlj.52.3.253","title":"Dealing with the Legacy of Native Residential School Abuse in Canada: Litigation, ADR, and Restorative Justice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Economic Justice; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Tort; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.017026486490842728,"score_gpt":0.23118182172628224,"score_spread":0.2141553352354395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030102691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96335334,0.001858859,0.00003675347,0.0034903507,0.00007654495,0.00015084041,0.0000066288003,0.0000041161147,0.031022547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982244,0.0010359546,0.00035525224,0.000027385582,0.00005311771,5.4799532e-8,1.4899227e-7,0.0000016948927,0.000301997],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999178,0.00019388631,0.000097794924,0.00007174672,0.00033606665,0.00012251224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918664,0.00014274269,0.00019959963,0.000038391267,0.00034998707,0.00008264499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002309802,0.000055352037,0.00012165368,0.000008536652,0.0011032494,0.000025610292,0.0001528837,0.00002603114,0.00028077594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009349418,0.000042143503,0.000020290767,0.000043888875,0.00046334774,0.0007650908,0.000023546187,0.00013708632,2.7940908e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028953305,0.000063328225,0.018465906,0.0000420032,0.00032152288,0.00012545667,0.8833268,0.000543494,0.00010386684,0.087130725,0.008547643,0.0010396712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009354628,0.00007091039,0.06569548,0.000127722,0.0001127591,0.000003931894,0.915519,0.000059939994,0.00004347088,0.000082914594,0.017218422,0.00012997014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.994605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087047815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001166168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018897651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8485413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030363845","doi":"10.1086/673873","title":"Rehabilitating the Declaratory Theory of the Common Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legislation","score_opus":0.02214349315025743,"score_gpt":0.2970554508928305,"score_spread":0.27491195774257304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030363845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92776686,0.0010164079,0.00000745421,0.007948975,0.00029590944,0.000083666106,7.738909e-7,0.000003936537,0.062876046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99850523,0.00004305889,0.00007487691,0.0010428384,0.00022304122,8.0075563e-7,1.4638265e-8,0.000002661985,0.000107471846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986139,0.00068383047,0.00022253837,0.000044053762,0.00032595612,0.000109755405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984017,0.0010494865,0.00028075106,0.00007876146,0.00014830114,0.00004100493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025254062,0.000052988657,0.0001502098,0.000004326095,0.00094529334,0.000035869118,0.00021458909,0.00003896186,0.000011400008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029494995,0.000022994094,0.0000964872,0.000036475525,0.0010994801,0.0000988949,0.000047814876,0.00017239556,5.5992837e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011392162,0.000016982129,0.0035819765,0.000007634581,0.000028008597,3.7304468e-7,0.02819059,0.0000048931556,0.00015250391,0.96589565,0.00035513967,0.0017548795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061286637,0.00023354309,0.076831155,0.00024324721,0.00014177617,0.000010653992,0.044794813,0.000012185933,0.0005051954,0.3253453,0.5510878,0.00018149838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085630815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021837344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6405503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029384155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023246175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7270528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031267729","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.24.1.207","title":"Mandatory Family Mediation and the Settlement Mission: A Feminist Critique","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Settlement (finance); Family mediation; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Party-directed mediation; Lawyer supported mediation; Transformative mediation; Family law; Economic Justice; Political science; Power (physics); Law; Dispute mechanism; Criminology; Sociology; Gender studies; Business","score_opus":0.03219285432878593,"score_gpt":0.28928956723856775,"score_spread":0.2570967129097818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031267729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5636907,0.095835045,0.000008133895,0.3156371,0.0024750931,0.0004611432,0.0000984246,0.000005211246,0.021789117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812917,0.0047215642,0.000041455452,0.0074673574,0.0015244652,0.000012959254,0.0000018437552,0.000011797613,0.0049268375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976853,0.00083830004,0.00041996737,0.00011882613,0.00024180664,0.00069579127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772257,0.0006876048,0.0003281728,0.000107722066,0.00011805418,0.0010358938],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048431875,0.00018210898,0.00043203216,0.00003652337,0.0013719354,0.0002344183,0.00026437876,0.0001221955,0.00017034139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037620222,0.0001072203,0.000118340715,0.00013537194,0.0030334298,0.0003732977,0.00004693882,0.00043128894,0.000008458279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007464934,0.000014539993,0.002586125,0.000056625693,0.00017890861,0.000017766226,0.3563961,0.0000016252485,0.000002021496,0.6312621,0.006702268,0.0027072197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028248597,0.000069252514,0.007840798,0.00019466774,0.00013076425,0.00010973194,0.13106728,0.000017606057,0.0000034166546,0.029712219,0.82781607,0.00021335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02198694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03290255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82111377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007453748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003325477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031497028","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0026","title":"Banging Constitutional Bibles: Observing Constitutional Culture in Transition","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Modernity; Political economy; Globalization; Ideology; Citizenship; Face (sociological concept); Political science; State (computer science); Economic history; Sociology; Law; History; Social science","score_opus":0.021269041020626062,"score_gpt":0.25743577320305894,"score_spread":0.23616673218243286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031497028","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14005491,0.008183916,0.010560344,0.012975925,0.00086245284,0.0004540549,0.00008530197,0.00010902136,0.8267141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99393976,0.00096523506,0.0044299928,0.00010033757,0.00027001897,7.1477835e-8,0.0000038687795,0.0000011715972,0.00028956388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907506,0.00011239126,0.00013618742,0.00010415625,0.00035735493,0.00021486534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951833,0.000042722368,0.00009723552,0.00003437875,0.0002039171,0.000103416685],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003470544,0.00007867978,0.0001430872,0.000026219224,0.001735474,0.000031378848,0.00018519851,0.00009031192,0.0013071804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036121273,0.000080249694,0.00010532119,0.00007296188,0.0022093584,0.0011953949,0.000026332056,0.00016546262,0.000008659271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041997067,0.000086594875,0.002201278,0.0000101664755,0.00005857725,0.00003066512,0.065724134,0.0017241723,0.00032224428,0.92692035,0.0017626281,0.0011171665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018727883,0.000035810786,0.0066690687,0.00027048355,0.000058258196,0.000035118785,0.14226504,0.0001946067,0.00004622228,0.0006032627,0.84764105,0.00030829327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038036764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22394188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9263171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012111879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015579391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031972923","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0011","title":"Troubling the Definition of Pornography: Little Sisters, a New Defining Moment in Feminists' Engagement with the Law?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Feminism; Lesbian; Supreme court; Harm; Economic Justice; Law; Identity (music); Sociology; Sexual orientation; Appeal; Political science; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Art","score_opus":0.04530703119893826,"score_gpt":0.2694244258199427,"score_spread":0.22411739462100444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031972923","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8319529,0.002894428,0.000015763282,0.13344681,0.000107139764,0.00030742268,0.000009118065,0.000004766809,0.03126163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970884,0.0002636276,0.00024644684,0.0019644916,0.00017867015,0.000014169739,9.324987e-7,0.0000077862105,0.00023552874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986012,0.00035351308,0.00031282371,0.000099586374,0.00022543537,0.0004074559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988494,0.0004203692,0.0002931859,0.00011014086,0.00007838423,0.00024851676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027011305,0.00011618297,0.00026497434,0.000054347503,0.00088407204,0.00017236693,0.00031799325,0.00004080223,0.000041219904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000081167826,0.00005860423,0.00009568198,0.0002448721,0.000827004,0.00017909982,0.000025280222,0.0003388281,0.000001454056],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060593804,0.000011122411,0.0016775464,0.000010087218,0.00010901582,0.00000830896,0.35067487,0.000050614468,0.0000026638443,0.6460385,0.00028980424,0.001066887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048380173,0.00037256943,0.010466659,0.00051431276,0.0001775773,0.000053955842,0.63660705,0.000025885,0.000035713103,0.04724296,0.29924953,0.00041579214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04795464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42743573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59879553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044198622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002931777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9583851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032951353","doi":"10.1002/crq.21041","title":"Judicial settlement‐seeking in parenting disputes: Consensus and controversy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conflict Resolution Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Mediation; Coercion (linguistics); Family mediation; Political science; Lawyer supported mediation; Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Child custody; Best interests; Family law; Negotiation; Empirical research; Social psychology; Psychology; Dispute mechanism","score_opus":0.0400552926137572,"score_gpt":0.3229035647532588,"score_spread":0.28284827213950164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032951353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97842366,0.003185911,0.0001749917,0.004881446,0.00080599816,0.00060728885,0.000025719637,0.00013020984,0.011764767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99870765,0.000064019536,0.00015099098,0.00019493698,0.0005921755,0.000028294417,0.000007574909,0.000007400919,0.00024698168],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822867,0.00028069894,0.000300911,0.00020129279,0.00031712995,0.00067128334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923384,0.00030107654,0.00013599546,0.000084625884,0.000077618155,0.00016682259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008270525,0.0001386617,0.00022123737,0.000056479978,0.000732915,0.000095265976,0.00009470083,0.00010214981,0.000058597623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029098926,0.00013140592,0.000051854135,0.00016710353,0.000418637,0.0002486146,0.000027231557,0.00015682037,0.000029655022],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087765766,0.00016559895,0.3645756,0.000042458767,0.000106821535,0.000009856983,0.53490674,0.000004070924,0.0019434142,0.05726478,0.004847528,0.036045354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016806106,0.000121936144,0.44500148,0.0000974624,0.00004621306,0.0000023239122,0.109588355,0.00038956036,0.000016672877,0.0001724769,0.4424407,0.00044219568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007447503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042469855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43759316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022570325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033774046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032958395","doi":"10.7202/042247ar","title":"L'incidence de la nouvelle Loi sur les assurances sur les régimes matrimoniaux","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Law; Statutory law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Meaning (existential); Statutory interpretation; Civil code; Section (typography); Covenant; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014041951368181994,"score_gpt":0.27197364772768634,"score_spread":0.25793169635950436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032958395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9719274,0.0045030597,0.0004074432,0.005864942,0.00013680957,0.00026551963,0.000019920019,0.00026588186,0.016609048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97960293,0.0021484087,0.003165212,0.00026817629,0.00055518927,0.000038896673,0.00000394695,0.000027111668,0.014190151],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733025,0.00048434868,0.00032338404,0.00040348835,0.0006156176,0.0008429032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797696,0.0012092269,0.00018538283,0.0001869591,0.00020691355,0.00023456996],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00124093,0.00027772717,0.0003798612,0.000059432954,0.0019750611,0.00024690002,0.0006154768,0.000505906,0.00027891577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016166632,0.00025387734,0.00021865146,0.00031614015,0.0018778133,0.0004544257,0.000076369564,0.00058850157,0.00010399739],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011700189,0.00034612507,0.40111062,0.00021155036,0.00042085105,0.00013417238,0.2542109,0.0011394741,0.0047072354,0.05852016,0.023895623,0.2551863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010969534,0.00008054896,0.38829613,0.00021242618,0.00016623171,0.000020075822,0.08405588,0.0005731134,0.0034074911,0.0048097963,0.5159154,0.0013659848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05835361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04701262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49201974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016163078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023717993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034111128","doi":"10.1017/s0714980800012265","title":"Parents Who Sue Their Adult Children For Support: An Examination of Decisions by Canadian Court Judges","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020591332642586835,"score_gpt":0.2583687626041644,"score_spread":0.23777742996157758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034111128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9336744,0.0029607548,0.00004897813,0.054353975,0.0023795995,0.0010503579,0.0024593805,0.000016438997,0.003056134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881646,0.0034983268,0.00015918563,0.0017212334,0.0011018817,0.000060403407,0.00034265144,0.000073419564,0.00487831],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952744,0.0006306526,0.00094605994,0.0006347501,0.0003263623,0.0021877529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99151254,0.00040824362,0.0005808056,0.0003750958,0.0013273935,0.0057959],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020834722,0.00056453736,0.0007276773,0.0005203787,0.003052797,0.0003918343,0.0009443941,0.00034234568,0.0009414683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013509856,0.0005542982,0.00031380344,0.00071386306,0.0006229882,0.00060387544,0.00002501442,0.00058267673,0.000021216618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040329884,0.0003282159,0.188012,0.00012649206,0.0011533079,0.0006971763,0.2245332,0.00089854765,0.000051101037,0.027178308,0.2143876,0.34259373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001003827,0.0005177899,0.16672106,0.00091002294,0.00018122102,0.0001721457,0.027266858,0.0002933112,0.00003127459,0.0003265843,0.80178326,0.0007926572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90955275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99822986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58739567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069380384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021225873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034634205","doi":"10.1093/icon/1.1.35","title":"Realizing equality in the twentieth century: the role of the Supreme Court of Canada in comparative perspective","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Doctrine; Politics; Constitutional right; Sociology","score_opus":0.04158335274513759,"score_gpt":0.3465534930473471,"score_spread":0.30497014030220954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034634205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41096765,0.0027549823,0.00005389007,0.034230486,0.001816579,0.0005044537,0.0001306143,0.000002907039,0.54953843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999534,0.000059934056,0.000044915792,0.00024548208,0.000082333274,0.0000026036682,6.3317793e-7,9.843144e-7,0.00002908751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974447,0.0006912443,0.00043021358,0.00006894842,0.0012357207,0.00012915615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978306,0.0006184777,0.0004371817,0.000059146227,0.0010302824,0.000024276515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015165014,0.00007130186,0.00017299537,0.00002639172,0.0002519897,0.000025139476,0.0005979115,0.000030313311,0.000040499483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066256674,0.000036091144,0.00010060198,0.0001750519,0.0019209541,0.00016365317,0.00003674752,0.00025962834,2.3919284e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030027313,0.00006279454,0.015718894,9.929933e-7,0.00008190912,0.0000026928242,0.016855283,0.0005739871,0.00007835232,0.96631575,0.0002686047,0.000010740624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001303765,0.000035946243,0.11014394,0.00028649697,0.000045721514,0.000038052127,0.40142727,0.00003634016,0.0015509578,0.09195795,0.39298296,0.00019061238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3700505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.635282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87435776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007724982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013450913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7077835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035453133","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100009145","title":"First Nations and Self-Government: A Matter of Trust","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Health Services","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013139973385049802,"score_gpt":0.2509144429320573,"score_spread":0.23777446954700748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035453133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89732075,0.016945,0.00004231742,0.027273664,0.0016171136,0.00031246015,0.00030284788,0.000007353335,0.05617849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850217,0.0051748287,0.00094574044,0.0021084307,0.0005699015,0.000002081408,0.0000023618445,0.000025475425,0.006149441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780536,0.0001025469,0.00068643445,0.00024564855,0.00025760912,0.00090241595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661946,0.00063214544,0.00056141894,0.000119415585,0.00039965814,0.0016678978],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016531952,0.00025943373,0.0005685195,0.000045083612,0.0018347115,0.00011537304,0.00025510901,0.00034550723,0.0003432578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023911518,0.0002772837,0.00036698667,0.00033612837,0.0017871793,0.0004815154,0.000036227313,0.00049406773,0.0000037453572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006284796,0.000053190353,0.008494087,0.00048791856,0.00068047,0.000095782714,0.41450322,0.000011826938,0.000011178052,0.5702284,0.0042894064,0.0011382115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011433151,0.00020412331,0.036152836,0.0007990378,0.00043980428,0.00019905252,0.19204529,0.00005557094,0.000018915462,0.0037790628,0.7645911,0.0005718885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29385817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94796354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7603017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00248256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005535194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036660388","doi":"10.7202/038658ar","title":"Laws of Desire: The Political Morality of Public Sex","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Jurisprudence; Human sexuality; Law; Pleasure; Supreme court; Constitution; Liberalism; Politics; Mainstream; Sociology; Political science; Identity (music); Psychology","score_opus":0.10866045140832759,"score_gpt":0.3559120432329751,"score_spread":0.2472515918246475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036660388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18587685,0.00042169637,0.00004127764,0.095430456,0.00035403323,0.00028510642,0.000038673083,0.000045509747,0.7175064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99889815,0.000042528016,0.00028488864,0.00045267554,0.00020540993,8.790864e-7,2.8931373e-7,0.0000030491153,0.00011214043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809736,0.00047198255,0.00033875834,0.00008705384,0.0005830191,0.00042184282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905264,0.0001725602,0.00019045643,0.00010417543,0.00029711434,0.00018305157],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012484646,0.00008422299,0.00022330348,0.000013591729,0.0027858336,0.000043781747,0.00034551657,0.00006983675,0.000110040666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046656452,0.0000487188,0.00015299479,0.00016206069,0.00070281175,0.00021771263,0.000037914702,0.00023383895,0.0000043916884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003790385,0.000063848755,0.0012705721,0.0000027128237,0.000026978141,0.0000021334604,0.000769324,0.0000014672187,0.00005266569,0.9948517,0.00013715606,0.002817644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010843019,0.0003609918,0.112009466,0.00007275906,0.00012802344,0.000043507887,0.036446545,0.000025035359,0.005799172,0.11627184,0.7273013,0.00045708244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068710065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003658395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87857985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001508292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000180964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036720829","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.1.111","title":"Disability and Care: Still Not “Getting It”","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Ethnology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03274786859055405,"score_gpt":0.26834873718814833,"score_spread":0.23560086859759427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036720829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7753955,0.01278419,0.0000011328813,0.20338592,0.0008467492,0.00029405917,0.000029255772,0.000004112845,0.0072590816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911315,0.0010407058,0.00008839228,0.002847491,0.0007965707,0.000013609455,7.4549314e-7,0.000013765738,0.0040672105],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977956,0.0005073633,0.0004727385,0.00020660898,0.00020417306,0.0008135207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745893,0.00063531037,0.00031949233,0.00013536969,0.00027367362,0.0011772396],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016314032,0.00021757667,0.00054424553,0.000026323729,0.0010340131,0.00042552545,0.00031256958,0.00014145032,0.00037280747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060455245,0.00015603246,0.00013836053,0.00016496882,0.00448609,0.0005806576,0.000062532,0.000510176,0.00001892369],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032128355,0.00002217694,0.019271938,0.00021543627,0.00026425027,0.0000379709,0.75008,0.000013242079,0.00000566062,0.19963083,0.0021646025,0.02826179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023674187,0.00022274711,0.061438233,0.0004489824,0.00017145726,0.00012766536,0.42390788,0.00006543033,0.000009107646,0.048847627,0.4618002,0.0005932594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28083435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35066482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4596356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013717153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025522677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036865304","doi":"10.2478/bjlp-2013-0013","title":"The supreme court of Canada and the offender’s right to be transferred to serve his sentence in Canada: interpreting the international transfer of offenders act in light of Canada’s national and international human rights obligations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Baltic Journal of Law & Politics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of the Western Cape; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Appeal; Charter; Political science; Discretion; Jurisprudence; Sociology","score_opus":0.027626439528948273,"score_gpt":0.2773204547638114,"score_spread":0.24969401523486312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036865304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86088765,0.00008160171,0.000010155025,0.13395666,0.00035848192,0.00032755098,0.00008363452,9.057112e-7,0.0042933766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988209,0.00001894745,0.000039974777,0.00088874117,0.00005737695,0.000007926921,0.000001419769,0.0000045785155,0.00016014144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974621,0.00021057775,0.00078750984,0.00010595687,0.001150973,0.00028289447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977661,0.0009901515,0.00018451609,0.000071964445,0.00084658974,0.00014068735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087740197,0.000119132004,0.0002741153,0.000050509912,0.0003978966,0.00003893099,0.00055078894,0.0000315747,0.000043292028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040615848,0.00006675955,0.000048597078,0.00010492325,0.00040152154,0.00014558509,0.000049079623,0.00020831451,2.9587252e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014889079,0.00010157238,0.026383193,0.000056591594,0.00069724245,0.000014947241,0.105877444,0.0009993064,0.0011096082,0.8489982,0.015488344,0.00012468194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0076528853,0.00024293743,0.6567182,0.0014772043,0.00024299328,0.000075480624,0.1650989,0.0029499899,0.008193145,0.03472212,0.1215796,0.0010465516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9994163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81427604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017570689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036307606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64408135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041180421","doi":"10.1163/157181802761586734","title":"Law Commission of Canada, Restoring Dignity: Responding to Child Abuse in Canadian Institutions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Children s Rights","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Commission; Law; Political science; Child abuse; Criminology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Medical emergency; Psychology","score_opus":0.032056415312240474,"score_gpt":0.30364309045645504,"score_spread":0.2715866751442146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041180421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9070913,0.00017770067,0.0000030407214,0.02310491,0.0006961641,0.00013788775,0.000018401335,0.000004183937,0.06876638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998408,0.00004723035,0.00007310498,0.00031143858,0.000430227,0.0000012636109,8.41734e-7,0.000003397864,0.0007245041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983816,0.00012403609,0.0003436866,0.000074493066,0.00084134267,0.00023481042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990516,0.00013262536,0.00018640402,0.00007835105,0.000313652,0.00023742457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006079193,0.00007920074,0.00014684557,0.0002479926,0.0008193944,0.000053506126,0.00073652394,0.00003787421,0.00009967251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002767057,0.000050496597,0.00005615516,0.0003108338,0.00014911665,0.00023204976,0.00003594507,0.0002476003,0.000003589416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018832205,0.00024993173,0.06480607,0.0000047882204,0.0006697362,0.00024084898,0.17998672,0.004016089,0.00026039162,0.7170428,0.031233374,0.001300916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078454195,0.000045843586,0.14891554,0.00053335313,0.000030238987,0.000055413893,0.0015170726,0.000021974256,0.0009400082,0.0013779396,0.8455303,0.00024781196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98626584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8142969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014384103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033604106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63022023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043700055","doi":"10.1515/1565-3404.1291","title":"Family Law Reform in Australia, or Frozen Chooks Revisited Again?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Family law; Legislature; Face (sociological concept); Law reform; Law; Political science; Best interests; Welfare; Common law; Sociology; Law and economics; Social science","score_opus":0.07582124601240359,"score_gpt":0.3830031713158916,"score_spread":0.30718192530348803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043700055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4732661,0.00055285584,0.00012975238,0.0034393452,0.00071394973,0.00083458575,0.000020320731,0.00019007717,0.52085304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99568135,0.00010541728,0.00042298427,0.0016144387,0.000568016,0.000055506607,0.000007873119,0.000018763272,0.0015256532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706006,0.0005253256,0.00050392025,0.00029816336,0.00052216573,0.0010903538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988705,0.0004453422,0.00007723678,0.00026281294,0.00008297884,0.00026114556],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017892234,0.0002491349,0.00046827554,0.000043254982,0.00043933955,0.00010515965,0.00045939477,0.00031227307,0.0010812421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062885537,0.00017069303,0.000089813984,0.00044364546,0.053158566,0.0005853167,0.00023866046,0.00047083592,0.00025265903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095090625,0.00009051551,0.0022697535,0.000018565903,0.000014500114,0.000010021588,0.03255999,5.3743946e-7,0.0000408064,0.96441275,0.00026166026,0.00022583114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024882893,0.00027362796,0.012779944,0.0006216877,0.00008613568,0.00000407368,0.08613146,0.00001968982,0.0008774667,0.6301211,0.26480165,0.0017948742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007967153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002578902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5224152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008590071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025856483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044882823","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x11000743","title":"The Ecclesiastical Common Law: A Quarter-century Retrospective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Liturgy; Constitution; Quarter (Canadian coin); Consistency (knowledge bases); Common law; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03313965380810882,"score_gpt":0.29778595060976243,"score_spread":0.26464629680165364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044882823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08741293,0.001526445,0.0017864736,0.0130354455,0.0036347343,0.00082971953,0.000024534607,0.00037854398,0.8913712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99653727,0.00025572814,0.0010607422,0.0005418266,0.0014554332,0.000014225599,7.685358e-7,0.0000241479,0.00010983375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996065,0.0007776319,0.0005884304,0.00032740794,0.0011197133,0.0011217755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976333,0.0008952225,0.0001971354,0.00022841615,0.00035412895,0.00069184194],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014797755,0.00028473255,0.00040948746,0.000022160599,0.00835555,0.0005334724,0.00074107444,0.00022055193,0.00059854914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006866995,0.00017879314,0.00029208788,0.00020825383,0.0034262862,0.0004301943,0.0001540433,0.00117441,0.00031910796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010167278,0.00015812638,0.0013834074,0.0000026549599,0.00009496195,0.0000916051,0.013224342,5.880593e-7,0.00001328426,0.98173183,0.0016837659,0.0015137787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025734736,0.0012427699,0.21525367,0.00024139961,0.0004795839,0.00032558053,0.08925056,0.00018235287,0.00017713773,0.36874047,0.31980547,0.0017275275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049290583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016466279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9091244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005291432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007664572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W204544780","doi":"","title":"A Policy on Canon 844, 4 for Canadian Dioceses","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia canonica","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.03183636119800934,"score_gpt":0.3392317942763965,"score_spread":0.3073954330783871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W204544780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04855457,0.0004528995,3.920525e-7,0.029695876,0.00024238085,0.0008504399,0.0001314212,0.0000906152,0.9199814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9688031,0.0006433602,0.00009149603,0.001625253,0.0010239219,0.00022263617,0.0000066809075,0.00001739069,0.027566161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822015,0.0000940987,0.00017451696,0.0003187326,0.0003305562,0.0008619699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902505,0.00023153279,0.00004216847,0.00016851374,0.00012277323,0.00040996438],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025177654,0.00017695565,0.00024905027,0.00007063294,0.0021996894,0.0000814392,0.0003196137,0.000106325584,0.0007698774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000527835,0.00014857238,0.00012741708,0.0003958652,0.00030508163,0.000094896364,0.00002083261,0.0001190519,0.00025006043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017159869,0.00026708056,0.010206949,0.0000467679,0.00059408933,0.00003408753,0.0921134,0.00007994193,0.00005487623,0.56233037,0.24299504,0.0911058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031502082,0.00009378558,0.012952646,0.000015592848,0.000017182552,2.1726206e-7,0.0021514613,3.3069125e-7,0.000012493799,0.00023564293,0.9839926,0.0002130631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90868783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9686132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9202485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015143241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011401519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045801057","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.1.056","title":"The Supreme Court, Ameliorative Programs, and Disability: Not Getting It","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Supreme court; Humanities; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04075763082411048,"score_gpt":0.2789339670349551,"score_spread":0.2381763362108446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045801057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61287034,0.009916002,0.000001700817,0.37143758,0.00061606005,0.0005252659,0.000012951544,0.000004696794,0.0046154256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98686594,0.001977837,0.00007477156,0.0023342483,0.0007294397,0.000041877665,8.2051446e-7,0.000015478392,0.007959594],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724513,0.0007847545,0.000535715,0.00020751354,0.0002639314,0.00096294127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99697,0.0011141391,0.0004324691,0.00015556424,0.00034379942,0.000984025],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031170533,0.00024106322,0.0005151844,0.00002111445,0.0025246548,0.0010166997,0.000425166,0.00012680641,0.00013576023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067934237,0.00014127526,0.00014279308,0.00022118595,0.007483719,0.00061520113,0.00007363226,0.0006131428,0.000016628157],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055607794,0.000035675585,0.012668474,0.00008198548,0.0005205594,0.000031873016,0.49796802,0.000005946577,0.0000044206377,0.4234815,0.004398528,0.060747407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014195906,0.00027244075,0.011249785,0.00035022924,0.00013103112,0.00009431744,0.30823866,0.00012401743,0.0000044290728,0.09344471,0.58426255,0.00040821335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14092572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40658644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.579864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010005278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028767873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99877393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046776891","doi":"10.1515/1565-3404.1292","title":"Something Old, Something New? Re-theorizing Patriarchal Relations and Privatization from the Outskirts of Family Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Family law; Law; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.059238919851540256,"score_gpt":0.35029443015572254,"score_spread":0.2910555103041823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046776891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8840249,0.0031468542,0.04399739,0.021182498,0.0011918668,0.0009330229,0.00003500396,0.00017681975,0.045311652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99395895,0.00012048958,0.004285904,0.00084736844,0.00068965513,0.000010454947,0.0000070459905,0.0000147400315,0.000065371074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751264,0.00089298293,0.00042905842,0.0002108763,0.0004955647,0.0004588527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950947,0.004339713,0.00014474094,0.00019446532,0.00009086912,0.00013547047],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026523145,0.00015701202,0.00028499507,0.000027819942,0.0010659908,0.000104327184,0.00028110194,0.0002045439,0.00013214802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00308814,0.00010827562,0.00006381207,0.00031976018,0.03566414,0.0006761087,0.00028002122,0.0004012303,0.000011434182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016432969,0.000020195657,0.0063442285,0.000004835316,0.00002093585,2.5981146e-7,0.18510199,0.000007785482,0.0002144812,0.80764884,0.000044805067,0.0005752409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032873917,0.000021341673,0.0022395838,0.00010735185,0.00004878483,1.7005607e-7,0.054458827,0.000047047433,0.00038109045,0.9369991,0.0051677306,0.00020022162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044749416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040799085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13064316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121741985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032820022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96696025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048516103","doi":"10.1136/bmj.e4251","title":"British Columbian judge says Canada's ban on physician assisted dying is unconstitutional","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.041977735883648254,"score_gpt":0.31173181500949426,"score_spread":0.26975407912584604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048516103","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37086332,0.00037761536,0.0000067555743,0.03503027,0.002220363,0.00070035906,0.00010851441,0.00013175746,0.59056103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99045014,0.000013464805,0.00013642985,0.0030200197,0.0012773548,0.00003227263,0.000010192827,0.0000064178003,0.00505373],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844235,0.00011554156,0.00016461959,0.0001665052,0.0006221077,0.00048888393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943566,0.00009861557,0.00008583462,0.00008719721,0.00010353035,0.00018913292],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031634516,0.000095630414,0.00015730978,0.0000095541955,0.0013028671,0.00010820977,0.00015055403,0.00006844678,0.0004906417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023235417,0.00010942647,0.00006138779,0.00017594479,0.00029730686,0.00019387148,0.00004063565,0.00012602993,0.00006560685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000535029,0.00010189989,0.042167194,0.000009512504,0.000084055224,0.00001518419,0.006511222,0.0000046592213,0.00006486555,0.010384441,0.917887,0.022764659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014562502,0.0000063963257,0.36537874,0.000039936906,0.000013250627,0.0000014317848,0.0033343427,0.0000033185668,0.000022751003,0.000036603687,0.6308347,0.00018288582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94400966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9747147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61958677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008193926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042968622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049116657","doi":"10.7202/010321ar","title":"How to Read Aboriginal Legal Texts From Upper Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Canadian Historical Association","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Legal history; Colonialism; History; Period (music); Legal pluralism; Code (set theory); Sociology; Legal realism; Political science; Legal profession; Linguistics; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.010744771549611364,"score_gpt":0.24560144834150466,"score_spread":0.2348566767918933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049116657","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08465192,0.0003804141,0.0000046106643,0.90967536,0.0030511983,0.000120737735,0.00004748003,0.0000067233,0.0020615337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7875394,0.000029896397,0.00045842095,0.0028855333,0.004148397,0.0000026696002,9.717544e-7,0.000008820806,0.2049259],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787724,0.00021078804,0.00026409136,0.00010835276,0.0011383012,0.00040120416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815834,0.00017497443,0.0004334291,0.00008279514,0.00056453457,0.00058594707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005366874,0.00010180401,0.00022091123,0.00005126509,0.0010337677,0.00013339872,0.00040621258,0.0001269134,0.000080447964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020742677,0.0000737256,0.0001338955,0.0002994708,0.0000110846695,0.0003138867,0.0000128248885,0.00035832878,0.000010215573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005586478,0.0000104000255,0.019829076,6.2530984e-7,0.000057248824,0.0000073479496,0.0040114443,0.000031327494,0.000019581075,0.00033238137,0.97278905,0.0029059371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011699644,0.000011406931,0.024316534,0.000010454768,0.0000349089,6.258637e-7,0.0003237636,0.0000023771108,0.000010769358,0.000061925726,0.97500795,0.00010230015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9992404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90678984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.36507136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035647014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.795101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049639457","doi":"10.7202/043095ar","title":"Le droit des grands-parents aux relations personnelles avec leurs petits-enfants : une étude comparative des systèmes québécois, français et belge","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.035534812599663956,"score_gpt":0.2982724493054202,"score_spread":0.26273763670575623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049639457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9285136,0.026645528,0.00139019,0.00846365,0.00041469777,0.0007028417,0.00020474938,0.0002453491,0.033419386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97174114,0.004331441,0.0035533379,0.00042132798,0.0004598926,0.00010546941,0.00005682714,0.00006014047,0.019270435],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99554175,0.00072787853,0.00070623966,0.0007758222,0.0008550283,0.0013933078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976371,0.00075263134,0.0003606588,0.0002930267,0.00041698298,0.00053961255],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007251477,0.00064086297,0.0009127784,0.000136251,0.00593384,0.00028861797,0.00068793073,0.00065098057,0.00028274368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005045715,0.00068158715,0.00050106784,0.0012106913,0.007914955,0.001195379,0.00012944057,0.0010714144,0.00040562788],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004967423,0.00035786178,0.044981714,0.0001233871,0.00055691955,0.000023876306,0.7988681,0.0011973738,0.00006817851,0.14437373,0.0010631948,0.008335976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020245146,0.00018317378,0.5387602,0.00079905277,0.00054229505,0.000029029237,0.3935999,0.0009604249,0.00022059199,0.027619077,0.033852376,0.0014093863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3536066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7835396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49377847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002757696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053512445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049684305","doi":"10.5539/res.v5n4p88","title":"Does Abortion Take A Human Life? Thomas Aquinas Answers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of European Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human life; Warrant; Goodwill; Abortion; Epistemology; Contemplation; Sociology; Law; Right to life; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Human rights; Political science; Humanity","score_opus":0.06239239851022458,"score_gpt":0.36903443955199705,"score_spread":0.30664204104177245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049684305","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09347504,0.60377663,0.000004046631,0.022313196,0.00082962686,0.0021566295,0.000010570082,0.00027376533,0.27716053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40407377,0.58706766,0.00028230355,0.0011830997,0.00060222205,0.000063960295,0.0000037855177,0.000023622531,0.006699537],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745154,0.0009049451,0.0005747215,0.0002767314,0.0004567491,0.00033528867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854267,0.00014788195,0.00036897356,0.00021274133,0.00061410863,0.0001136165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013252157,0.00020630972,0.0006091354,0.000027093312,0.00092513085,0.000040643237,0.00030668514,0.000024753735,0.0002025483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021286588,0.00010805721,0.00021043424,0.00028140648,0.0007997707,0.00030813148,0.00019160844,0.00011317135,0.00032533737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009683801,0.00038455776,0.02762982,0.02199582,0.0022709488,0.00002965014,0.12983726,0.000001385383,0.0016378924,0.034880117,0.6984103,0.08291262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019212668,0.00007368104,0.079507634,0.0059063123,0.0001896663,2.3917087e-7,0.027732026,1.7742147e-7,0.000027580532,0.00019503472,0.8858345,0.00034102445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025713502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31059876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008531949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002051036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7115452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050473596","doi":"10.7202/042465ar","title":"Regards sur le nouveau droit de la famille au Canada anglais et au Québec","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Legislation; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Statutory law; Political science; Property law; Individualism; Private law; Comparative law; Public law; Property rights","score_opus":0.00892970135996337,"score_gpt":0.24345828014881882,"score_spread":0.23452857878885544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050473596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84101206,0.00022854043,0.00011189794,0.009633615,0.00014632051,0.00016578833,0.000022630602,0.00010790143,0.14857122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97153366,0.0001092569,0.0006219347,0.0015336752,0.0005255158,0.00003071908,0.0000065226104,0.000024286395,0.025614427],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978203,0.0003158006,0.00022057207,0.00029567594,0.00050838914,0.0008392314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987891,0.0005137339,0.00010295212,0.00018050596,0.000101603626,0.00031212842],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088560896,0.00019602681,0.00027704312,0.000032666954,0.0016591384,0.000085876905,0.0004021623,0.0002903566,0.00006682307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009765718,0.00019954595,0.00012909134,0.00022725984,0.00092108647,0.00021185559,0.000059870712,0.0004684038,0.000017835859],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058283847,0.00021524762,0.16630387,0.000070700364,0.0003660205,0.00015436788,0.5574245,0.0010277098,0.00044177493,0.1775072,0.05909337,0.03733697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052581914,0.000019447894,0.12633912,0.000025274514,0.00003578127,0.000005689854,0.02923666,0.00008798199,0.00022135304,0.00058141566,0.8425129,0.00040853766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9992309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99977684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78341955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026924528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068782275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051730828","doi":"10.1080/13642980500032180","title":"Pushing under-18s onto the street: a Canadian charter analysis of Ontario's welfare-to-work scheme","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Denial; Minor (academic); Law; Political science; Fiduciary; Duty; Social work; State (computer science); Intervention (counseling); Work (physics); Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.03087847196912832,"score_gpt":0.3165752544350191,"score_spread":0.2856967824658908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051730828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9403053,0.00006305987,0.000008797359,0.05264759,0.00029980933,0.00010575451,0.00000689191,0.000005341272,0.006557483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967649,0.0000035970138,0.00014176105,0.0006458072,0.00068467134,0.000002500862,0.000002325277,0.000004411533,0.0017500349],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980838,0.00011525339,0.00044462885,0.000103053884,0.0010178135,0.00023545531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986407,0.00011319505,0.00036715303,0.00012585279,0.0005977428,0.0001553266],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083231105,0.00011142938,0.0002330119,0.00021299823,0.0012632736,0.00012965754,0.0012608632,0.00004819156,0.0011598261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004515084,0.00005566667,0.0002649526,0.00028226755,0.00021082487,0.00025827772,0.00006382957,0.0002783184,0.000012891377],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013949581,0.00026407602,0.08016909,0.0000027744481,0.014079308,0.000049078586,0.49203014,0.0036120978,0.0004129725,0.39694658,0.010545917,0.0017484785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041400347,0.00006505328,0.5156153,0.00007981949,0.00055065606,0.0000029900823,0.007776144,0.000025829493,0.00015312116,0.0031767208,0.47191077,0.00022958782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8502096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99864376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.484254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019265114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021258336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052246055","doi":"10.7202/1027786ar","title":"Settling the Fisheries: Pre-Confederation Crown Policy in Upper Canada and the Supreme Court's decisions in R. v. NIKAL and LEWIS","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Fishing; Law; Casual; Political science; Context (archaeology); Fishery; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.014573029034074913,"score_gpt":0.2583157527115432,"score_spread":0.2437427236774683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052246055","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94625413,0.00022289906,0.000013908603,0.048821066,0.00006370047,0.00036179842,0.0000060293914,0.00001125826,0.0042451774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979244,0.0004486439,0.00007590935,0.0006764098,0.0002537155,0.00004313755,0.000002167897,0.0000063233715,0.0005693209],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881464,0.00030556816,0.00020476534,0.00017705325,0.00018724687,0.00031069922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987211,0.0010033929,0.000059858896,0.00011140419,0.000040064708,0.000064149186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093490485,0.000081563165,0.00018526314,0.000023975026,0.00077666325,0.00020111036,0.00015873404,0.000071727474,0.000012130328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002042493,0.000063313295,0.000026139624,0.00013971052,0.00039745177,0.00015626213,0.00007006145,0.00018958682,8.7898894e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011436636,0.000034309585,0.63193846,0.000040650975,0.000045910532,0.000009379965,0.22994548,0.0004146173,0.00012337299,0.115150124,0.0039393688,0.018243957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011742013,0.000018076335,0.9235242,0.00011287108,0.000018593993,0.0000066019807,0.019514533,0.0028707027,0.000021390399,0.017580882,0.034910087,0.00024786597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89778715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.985505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29158574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003701711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016760429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5973544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053262304","doi":"10.7202/043035ar","title":"La fiducie du Code civil : un sujet d'affrontement dans la communauté juridique québécoise","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.01176586361201631,"score_gpt":0.2522023982274293,"score_spread":0.24043653461541298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053262304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72501564,0.0074835983,0.0010374307,0.042616177,0.0006073073,0.00054327474,0.00014255158,0.00022524562,0.22232875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9584213,0.005583755,0.0016476639,0.0016663279,0.00081616745,0.00009488263,0.000023414615,0.00005298654,0.03169354],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956315,0.001613695,0.0005358131,0.0005122896,0.0006355669,0.0010711072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758863,0.0012132361,0.00025922526,0.0004017155,0.00013388408,0.00040329667],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017799756,0.00046706342,0.00055323396,0.00004758958,0.0018903639,0.00020695852,0.0008648798,0.00082120654,0.0007130187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005202647,0.00047347517,0.00037066912,0.000372157,0.004005619,0.0004007408,0.00020653912,0.0012088271,0.0002579814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003669651,0.0006022021,0.003817061,0.00010065014,0.00043194633,0.00013267786,0.52753115,0.00021283893,0.00023634205,0.40330338,0.01840048,0.045194544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072331773,0.00006952083,0.010213632,0.00018547129,0.00018789683,0.000026627466,0.052846175,0.00030902028,0.00046809914,0.0028044751,0.931539,0.00062678155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04109146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28806853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9131385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054327156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033374192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053797283","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00602_1.x","title":"Constitutional Rights and Social Welfare: A Comment on the Canadian <i>Chaoulli</i> Health Care Decision","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Deference; Supreme court; Political science; Jurisprudence; Law; Health care; Judicial deference; Social security; Legislature; Judicial review; Social Welfare; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0361121533054164,"score_gpt":0.323076463333312,"score_spread":0.28696431002789563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053797283","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009810092,0.08743686,0.00003154432,0.8517221,0.00018756397,0.0013470954,0.000095415424,0.00004431809,0.058154076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9477627,0.0020860643,0.0000836824,0.049761523,0.0001661739,0.000055135693,0.00002309486,0.0000034253958,0.000058186823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985548,0.00025835802,0.00021388075,0.00019726719,0.00044658064,0.0003290889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995134,0.00009986062,0.000081492195,0.000089622095,0.00010062721,0.0001150178],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047660506,0.00012779562,0.00025674203,0.0000067832857,0.0070891497,0.000087689616,0.0001534871,0.00005803384,0.0000782663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024836734,0.00007575747,0.00007928602,0.00008130799,0.0009912275,0.00006052932,0.000032949265,0.00014064548,0.000025343026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012001373,0.000009705768,0.000021960208,0.00007226479,0.000007129102,0.0000014757192,0.002936168,7.432249e-7,4.4197357e-8,0.9530265,0.03915236,0.004770452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095887786,0.000009951327,0.00017832083,0.0002873197,0.000013554696,5.4050236e-7,0.00017478399,0.0000018357166,3.3343272e-7,0.0047499486,0.99438745,0.00010005571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75876904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9294023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9552351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008774457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001585125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056537542","doi":"10.1177/0959353504040296","title":"Equal Marriage/Le Droit Égal Au Mariage: A Personal View from Canada","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Feminism & Psychology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.035425613546729066,"score_gpt":0.3280157040067911,"score_spread":0.292590090460062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056537542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55837005,0.016978394,0.00023522472,0.18118359,0.022031767,0.00078948104,0.0007073848,0.00012822148,0.21957587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97423,0.00093565375,0.0009674379,0.009412989,0.0035815013,0.000072072246,0.0000750888,0.000044117685,0.010681147],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953908,0.00057698507,0.00067316706,0.0010453351,0.0007930819,0.0015206852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998216,0.00042838545,0.00031973122,0.0003588231,0.00013907593,0.0005380256],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060015323,0.0005165469,0.0007967952,0.00003667165,0.0014058211,0.00008221079,0.0007760948,0.0006637662,0.004182739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026430728,0.000534942,0.00026287785,0.000461671,0.0018280547,0.00024191634,0.00021068168,0.0008186507,0.0006988632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026061252,0.0015015564,0.011228783,0.00014809339,0.0016890767,0.0017391494,0.39868414,0.000024490884,0.00060437946,0.2560238,0.21808392,0.11001201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033154748,0.00026344496,0.10266071,0.00016549915,0.0002130103,0.00003791702,0.027746769,0.0000063217735,0.000039680304,0.04749899,0.8169565,0.0010956908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98405826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9581472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5988726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027157974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024299258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059075898","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/16.2.145","title":"Context and Inclusivity in Canada's Evolving Definition of the Family","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Charter; Commission; Context (archaeology); Legislature; Inclusion (mineral); Interdependence; Law; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.04102726335986378,"score_gpt":0.2980762770370748,"score_spread":0.257049013677211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059075898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9318186,0.0024977485,0.0000024100657,0.025882632,0.00031330794,0.00007517589,0.000013865283,0.0000014238443,0.039394822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99583006,0.001318615,0.000023614011,0.002549872,0.00022788477,0.0000010372138,9.573432e-8,0.0000020758746,0.000046767433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893314,0.00020137307,0.00024879113,0.000048609403,0.00046471864,0.00010334506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896914,0.00048422496,0.0002403336,0.000034042587,0.00023602409,0.00003621858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046883512,0.000057027853,0.00013821777,0.000027314776,0.00027200676,0.000040428575,0.00025687835,0.00002573721,0.0000071420254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005928444,0.000031061347,0.00004844735,0.000071125156,0.000542326,0.0001574301,0.00010514467,0.00014473248,3.0957648e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008512936,0.000038037473,0.016094323,0.0000064026713,0.00015173409,0.0000104765195,0.04121322,0.000016153219,0.0002796826,0.93500644,0.0011390507,0.0059593623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004664028,0.000046525533,0.8233069,0.00037794636,0.00005538158,0.0000372335,0.036854126,0.00029035241,0.00008975476,0.07608393,0.057961393,0.00023241156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95534027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83897656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8589225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035028532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016550253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20920835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059781724","doi":"10.7202/042628ar","title":"Homosexualité et droits à l'égalité dans les Chartes canadienne et québécoise","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Homosexuality; Political science; Scope (computer science); Law; Human rights; Section (typography); Sociology","score_opus":0.01707463852393631,"score_gpt":0.27828434820392894,"score_spread":0.26120970967999263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059781724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90673727,0.0005361846,0.00018097568,0.022166243,0.00015964804,0.00031200022,0.00006126353,0.00025549426,0.06959091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689137,0.0004461245,0.00096087484,0.0027108644,0.00040022944,0.000064328364,0.00002411404,0.00003309747,0.026446689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974464,0.00041066666,0.00031533517,0.00041900575,0.00042125818,0.0009873458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871457,0.0003559116,0.00013915072,0.00023696826,0.00012513805,0.00042829415],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011343401,0.0002717477,0.00033864894,0.00006110202,0.001388167,0.00015597254,0.0004725032,0.00033168783,0.00015960177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074039126,0.00026241754,0.00015628152,0.00031321277,0.00096741,0.00036925072,0.000056924924,0.00054102496,0.00007750561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011213562,0.000068444795,0.005776562,0.000018321532,0.00008726142,0.00002097648,0.46321648,0.000060212307,0.000686724,0.5118396,0.0014425049,0.016771665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006500213,0.000078211924,0.07581906,0.000058539383,0.0000898011,0.000010363817,0.1589389,0.00008668132,0.0004664712,0.00809538,0.754825,0.0008816005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48075643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90508634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75338244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024825095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020385192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059786336","doi":"10.7202/042443ar","title":"L'inconstitutionnalité des pouvoirs du protonotaire spécial","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Ultra vires; Political science; Statute; Legislature; Tribunal; Administration (probate law); Test (biology); Civil procedure; Economic Justice; Doctrine","score_opus":0.016582678824573035,"score_gpt":0.27831841000956276,"score_spread":0.2617357311849897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059786336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8888067,0.0002775895,0.0011843676,0.006892858,0.00020100242,0.00067182945,0.000008688762,0.00025116047,0.10170578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891641,0.00012428439,0.0027175087,0.00059393916,0.001497402,0.00011264549,0.0000031111547,0.000010055047,0.0057769525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986053,0.00013784498,0.00019186847,0.00022367052,0.00032537754,0.0005159231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942815,0.00009463462,0.0000731498,0.000099931625,0.00011683382,0.00018729571],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000490706,0.00014173753,0.00017564485,0.000033095916,0.0024327163,0.00010460606,0.00025719136,0.00022135703,0.00025730647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007080623,0.00013109663,0.00012871102,0.00021439466,0.0028323685,0.00032702854,0.000035885103,0.0002661722,0.00015083909],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041075597,0.0001165237,0.045608647,0.00003472143,0.00010795691,0.000027730324,0.15350682,0.00011620186,0.0002294946,0.69953066,0.004285965,0.096394174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006676642,0.00004081537,0.0370658,0.000058077552,0.00005955367,0.000010335049,0.02646788,0.00007867526,0.00056829385,0.021193262,0.91324735,0.000542309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004983667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00952704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90896136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002414215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014911685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060088122","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0018","title":"Causation, Common Sense, and the Common Law: Replacing Unexamined Assumptions with What We Know about Male Violence against Women or from Jane Doe to Bonnie Mooney","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Common sense; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Criminology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02346392379539503,"score_gpt":0.2650374439093258,"score_spread":0.2415735201139308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060088122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9365158,0.003026957,0.000003603269,0.056726158,0.00019142861,0.00040610897,0.000039320847,0.000009898485,0.0030806998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879313,0.003857748,0.000101738355,0.004730832,0.00032510114,0.000029427138,0.0000023235973,0.0000144571695,0.0030070567],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998062,0.00052208063,0.00039301845,0.00019870355,0.00025031247,0.000573896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797237,0.0006177443,0.00031035894,0.00021149158,0.00015628332,0.0007317824],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015548853,0.00019130006,0.00050895434,0.00005209521,0.0016870261,0.00059519504,0.00026054418,0.000085317595,0.00007341282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018635282,0.000107388914,0.000060359165,0.00022802265,0.0012800919,0.0006107857,0.000056498437,0.00035200178,0.000005001887],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009345013,0.000042313124,0.010444852,0.000051083414,0.0004909516,0.0001614304,0.847995,0.00053589116,0.00003545086,0.120963655,0.0008797289,0.01746513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01572416,0.00047681626,0.05049434,0.0059866244,0.00030681703,0.00046842897,0.50294065,0.00032883268,0.00008942507,0.0456242,0.3761057,0.0014540174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078237966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7861353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70789737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010935036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022746793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061815728","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr034","title":"Questions in Contemporary Medicine and the Philosophy of Charles Taylor: An Introduction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Epistemology; Theme (computing); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Politics; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.20226637052442897,"score_gpt":0.37637807841744847,"score_spread":0.1741117078930195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061815728","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026631372,0.04661547,0.00007704997,0.9194265,0.00067256094,0.00092074944,0.000026089852,0.0000125216275,0.0056177084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96696895,0.024969187,0.00015086925,0.0024389755,0.005423209,0.000011579295,0.0000074663963,0.00001815664,0.000011630574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99640226,0.0008002949,0.001361053,0.0002579962,0.00088396977,0.0002944056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955288,0.0017999548,0.0013436201,0.00026699665,0.0008008562,0.00025973548],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00841456,0.00032865943,0.001248127,0.00032191892,0.0006778099,0.0000064387077,0.00042485303,0.00024027418,0.00003292969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023789462,0.00015326653,0.00010240787,0.00041280218,0.028834237,0.0003330113,0.000088838024,0.00077237096,1.1904816e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022744718,0.00010828364,0.0011035132,0.00033899638,0.00022038496,0.0000033456622,0.12253835,7.100531e-7,0.00023028608,0.86967707,0.0013677478,0.0021368393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009451447,0.004797872,0.0006957371,0.0014749246,0.00049231754,0.000046495607,0.041052442,0.0000341339,0.000047089135,0.9371348,0.0045901905,0.00018253132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007127458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043095212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94033754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003195897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008019626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062369876","doi":"10.7202/039649ar","title":"Liberté de choix et protection juridique des conjoints de fait en cas de rupture : difficile exercice de jonglerie","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025196966567499333,"score_gpt":0.29717048251511724,"score_spread":0.2719735159476179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062369876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9109119,0.0013449034,0.00126955,0.032511402,0.0021129097,0.0006785043,0.0000944849,0.00015511276,0.05092124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834398,0.0014832243,0.008726915,0.000894625,0.0020645794,0.00006861994,0.0000017349248,0.000051852534,0.0032686403],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955622,0.0016740662,0.00046569802,0.00033657617,0.00050942635,0.0014520092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802494,0.0002777642,0.00035781227,0.00015896074,0.00041391555,0.00076662534],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003189454,0.0003928385,0.00042700404,0.000041601783,0.0076249028,0.00037403492,0.0004756419,0.00076538324,0.0007527812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014435458,0.00034280063,0.00030450945,0.0002877011,0.0010953596,0.0008180942,0.00013644146,0.0027628215,0.00006603586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003741815,0.0019042388,0.012693462,0.00064030546,0.0011008556,0.0012043568,0.36520568,0.0013885144,0.09919236,0.344047,0.0073251375,0.1649239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007209372,0.00019149204,0.026851853,0.00030748788,0.00018742293,0.0011992017,0.007910824,0.00024076171,0.011405164,0.0060717654,0.9442863,0.00062683097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.119427636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3302649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9369611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027156328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003399907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063483426","doi":"10.7202/042307ar","title":"L'article 4 du Statut de Westminster et la souveraineté du Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Law; Statute; Political science; Statutory law; Declaration; Legislation; Politics","score_opus":0.006170269590722302,"score_gpt":0.24288898574947945,"score_spread":0.23671871615875714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063483426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9332268,0.00010935484,0.00019407834,0.013736255,0.00009748504,0.00012538275,0.000012273652,0.000074219366,0.052424133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866319,0.00013043321,0.0009426408,0.0041022147,0.0003920764,0.000016144746,0.0000029024982,0.000012483648,0.007769216],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986235,0.00022841715,0.0001411383,0.00016992379,0.00031891448,0.00051810604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928284,0.0003044103,0.000051506548,0.000091503316,0.000058361333,0.00021137703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005255915,0.00011669759,0.00014072674,0.000015232211,0.00069535326,0.00009586647,0.00020492604,0.00013426122,0.00016435445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045458585,0.00010999273,0.000058612208,0.00012451674,0.00042081907,0.00018182001,0.000035670866,0.00026566835,0.000025659292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057772813,0.00015688312,0.14387415,0.000033402037,0.00021419676,0.00022916528,0.44957778,0.0011179858,0.00082338275,0.25125602,0.117171116,0.035488132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045652525,0.000016446977,0.06355099,0.000010569013,0.0000260261,0.0000072642133,0.018508242,0.00022153914,0.0002012301,0.0009850773,0.91574156,0.00027450087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5872275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90583885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79857045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023812873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005120135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62269837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063574972","doi":"10.7202/038178ar","title":"Between Exclusion and Assimilation: Experimentalizing Multiculturalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Multiculturalism; Sociology; Reasonable accommodation; Epistemology; Charter; Political science; Democracy; Law and economics; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06003431359858567,"score_gpt":0.35270728800830425,"score_spread":0.29267297440971857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063574972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5147362,0.0016003542,0.000024627305,0.029706696,0.0007552106,0.00045012252,0.000017536044,0.00019703488,0.45251226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99720323,0.0002539979,0.0011784919,0.00038658394,0.00078291487,0.000001583742,0.000002072716,0.000004838377,0.00018627595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872494,0.00015639926,0.00023350192,0.00015018755,0.0004320896,0.00030286712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942553,0.00006771874,0.0001257352,0.000049426857,0.00011512129,0.00021644549],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003862406,0.0001246779,0.00017667993,0.000018836205,0.010688372,0.00017506965,0.00012616145,0.000094970055,0.00010674262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080231504,0.000089789624,0.00007024184,0.000090654066,0.00019519609,0.00056053145,0.00003721006,0.00021733278,0.000010385628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102656086,0.00037769455,0.0159086,0.000028762643,0.0004322757,0.00020801251,0.2927245,0.000060277293,0.020022385,0.45800176,0.008835444,0.20329764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089112524,0.000101829,0.04942743,0.00008207944,0.000049614784,0.000026583659,0.022233274,0.000010266439,0.0027543942,0.0010923212,0.9229337,0.0003973993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016096206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013772201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91409826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024541855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000027726146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9905996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064013856","doi":"10.1163/157181902401737644","title":"F. Soetermeer, Livres et Juristes au Moyen Age","year":2002,"lang":"nl","type":"article","venue":"Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d Histoire du Droit / The Legal History Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Inversa Systems (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.048291288994928065,"score_gpt":0.2666084079801439,"score_spread":0.21831711898521583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064013856","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010670212,0.6229072,0.000009556981,0.036158975,0.006648415,0.0029888449,0.00009091065,0.0005255375,0.32960355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.054590926,0.4342806,0.00033372757,0.008039651,0.00344559,0.0006511777,0.00006529217,0.00029459526,0.49829844],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860358,0.0040361253,0.0029476979,0.0023331328,0.0021813512,0.0024658393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920162,0.0013780904,0.00242424,0.0025420866,0.00064474955,0.0009946361],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004623114,0.0019832957,0.0036307303,0.00023847417,0.006487908,0.0004191669,0.0041198945,0.0009284114,0.006725807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030289206,0.0016246167,0.002559756,0.0011639893,0.0058707497,0.0013239296,0.0008520453,0.003139752,0.008850583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006943046,0.00078870007,0.00009820536,0.006637003,0.00059356453,0.0009139489,0.037581243,0.000005808078,0.00010577342,0.037561886,0.88032776,0.035316706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075580296,0.00031965537,0.0002552998,0.008632996,0.0015054239,0.00023726061,0.0007663628,0.000082157065,0.0000045875645,0.00012718707,0.9852349,0.0020783695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018040141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018608635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18862659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008432813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005826027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064309533","doi":"10.1080/0953996032000164715","title":"Privative clauses in special education legislative schemes: are they constitutional under the <i>Canadian Charter?</i>","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education and the Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Appeal; Tribunal; Legislature; Standard of review; Statute; Judicial review","score_opus":0.0315993558873076,"score_gpt":0.31709915084016643,"score_spread":0.2854997949528588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064309533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057016294,0.0007744789,0.0000075362123,0.09538948,0.0016393139,0.00075250294,0.0000060743732,0.000014278776,0.84440005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910367,0.00010434606,0.00005021889,0.0046711476,0.00089610496,0.00009600922,0.0000045579504,0.0000026065863,0.003138288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990079,0.00039043732,0.00011895648,0.0001321689,0.00017683368,0.00017371756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999383,0.00022097192,0.000084261526,0.000082130595,0.0001588046,0.00007087037],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004972385,0.000084573636,0.00009600733,0.00002362754,0.0019016267,0.00014664629,0.00011777643,0.000053049145,0.00017424763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002994372,0.00004784408,0.000029197017,0.00015837494,0.0023492167,0.00020336939,0.0000109300345,0.00015007444,0.000032517037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033980848,0.00004253565,0.0018818906,0.0000011709939,0.000011258625,3.033665e-8,0.07296773,8.6184485e-7,8.182246e-7,0.922345,0.0024534853,0.00029185636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022604773,0.0000027348465,0.012399774,0.000024159724,0.000008343009,7.1914235e-7,0.14405859,4.955324e-7,0.000009771628,0.07702608,0.7661624,0.000080917176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0998463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6632797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9340204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003222051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014731139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066896834","doi":"10.7202/1019052ar","title":"La primauté du droit, l’égalité devant la loi et autres « principes non écrits de notre constitution »","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020484115229888827,"score_gpt":0.29281962588639876,"score_spread":0.27233551065650996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066896834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.258213,0.002658913,0.000152737,0.03153,0.0017822483,0.0005682837,0.00008072899,0.00011120391,0.7049029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98741865,0.0038646332,0.002258358,0.0008156748,0.00075135246,0.00003038988,0.000003752594,0.000024051376,0.00483311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959179,0.0013711947,0.0006166267,0.00035459828,0.00078350614,0.0009561752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781185,0.00062101573,0.00039531098,0.00014159702,0.0005014439,0.0005287716],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019699358,0.0003862266,0.0004754392,0.000043861743,0.006437594,0.0005618837,0.000442597,0.00045222967,0.000885397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057798176,0.00031742227,0.00030152543,0.0002528569,0.0022403544,0.001445037,0.00020228905,0.0011057637,0.00047200985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024161853,0.00037050567,0.0033761102,0.00011645084,0.00027775252,0.00026269723,0.011889941,0.0002564066,0.0004974579,0.9387445,0.0041759345,0.040008117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007676315,0.000082761326,0.022205265,0.0005238824,0.0001410166,0.0005833383,0.0041228468,0.00020535056,0.0004318075,0.004587955,0.9658746,0.00047351775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03887062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031781975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9616987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011921715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013421214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069593868","doi":"10.7202/042671ar","title":"Effets civils et organisation conventionnelle de l'union homosexuelle","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Property rights; Political science; Public order; Sociology; Law; Welfare economics; Business; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.011867375966667253,"score_gpt":0.2723764020536215,"score_spread":0.26050902608695425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069593868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9541515,0.00028831436,0.006116353,0.007288098,0.00016069476,0.00036527787,0.0000055413657,0.00019901653,0.0314252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98409736,0.00026155956,0.0020267686,0.00071960443,0.00031403103,0.00003186654,0.00001246561,0.000014288177,0.012522043],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998614,0.00034763612,0.00015984837,0.0001930451,0.0002804154,0.00040505387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994291,0.00018277776,0.00008513605,0.00010245293,0.00006340706,0.00013713089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009808091,0.00011415644,0.00014445644,0.00003265243,0.0010567529,0.00009238185,0.0001853036,0.00022420227,0.000520646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000355657,0.000115508905,0.000086700915,0.00016511476,0.000382971,0.00024824432,0.000030117497,0.000256256,0.00020476186],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037734982,0.0003405768,0.037128545,0.000073141855,0.00019721255,0.000018341609,0.5986466,0.0005544099,0.010183273,0.25765043,0.018680545,0.07648921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002603085,0.00014630206,0.14531173,0.00010627355,0.00016270766,0.00001228447,0.11877823,0.00092078914,0.009705637,0.04809802,0.67296386,0.0011911035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002777499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005962034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6542833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016849325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000072401555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8127796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069723000","doi":"10.1163/1571811042802019","title":"Our Treaty, Our Inherent Right to Self-Government: An Overview of the Nisga'a Final Agreement","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal on Minority and Group Rights","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Legislature; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Pluralism (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06995791471756657,"score_gpt":0.3599251918859901,"score_spread":0.2899672771684235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069723000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.970863,0.00031716502,0.000028972963,0.023106629,0.0015407234,0.0002752908,0.000035131496,0.000015005473,0.0038181017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966672,0.00037068775,0.00047804616,0.0004796746,0.0009956597,0.0000053418926,0.0000014285267,0.0000033842853,0.0009985458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759287,0.0001687787,0.0003044681,0.00019114857,0.0015242444,0.00021852151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926597,0.000025035039,0.00021927971,0.00009476173,0.00019717628,0.00019775353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038009835,0.00015309107,0.00018092546,0.00003272412,0.00083077006,0.00015820334,0.00052663346,0.000069330825,0.000052227722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003930994,0.00008678815,0.00014227773,0.000090400936,0.00004988186,0.00029328722,0.00010938856,0.00023349367,0.000020383197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006423944,0.0055080475,0.033636745,0.00006635492,0.0017566389,0.00029944323,0.08766954,0.000355555,0.0010253092,0.83818406,0.0066666384,0.024189292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004993006,0.0012438255,0.3981794,0.000700487,0.00021406724,0.00008940781,0.011082681,0.00001485056,0.0028983117,0.06300961,0.5167833,0.0007910596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035398984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011964518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77517444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007789471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004454401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6676482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070221634","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2013.865525","title":"The Judas Within: A Look at the Sexual Abuse Crisis in the Catholic Church","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"John Jay College of Criminal Justice","keywords":"Sexual abuse; Criminology; Psychology; Theology; Political science; Philosophy; Medicine; Medical emergency; Poison control; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.08772144611088523,"score_gpt":0.38744481117542645,"score_spread":0.2997233650645412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070221634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89922464,0.00063693605,4.4210543e-7,0.096748956,0.00038763753,0.0011271709,0.000006114021,0.00004946473,0.001818617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98683035,0.0003618107,0.000035938698,0.0029745912,0.0002876772,0.0009262736,0.000002466591,0.00001539908,0.008565478],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618316,0.0014330078,0.00031061607,0.00029435373,0.0012042678,0.0005746192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969864,0.0020497125,0.00013796093,0.00046964476,0.00027702298,0.00007924149],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044830823,0.00019225384,0.0001704572,0.000017405124,0.0055424557,0.0004888786,0.0010799817,0.00030636723,0.00019640858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009122147,0.00008185117,0.000091400216,0.00037885184,0.0017752614,0.00020932371,0.00019086747,0.0016806099,0.00046186772],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038818625,0.000063602914,0.011612054,0.000002917696,0.0000107844135,0.000005689218,0.97457725,0.0000024425929,0.00022527215,0.0026988662,0.0095172655,0.0012799464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024579893,0.000046395042,0.25460327,0.000013457,0.00009690307,0.000003920558,0.59943527,0.000004420856,0.000076044664,0.0003482891,0.1448364,0.0002898673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.094159774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15781997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37514204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028959863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001412805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070992217","doi":"10.1093/jcs/css091","title":"Child Sexual Abuse &amp; the Catholic Church: Gender, Power, and Organizational Culture","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Church and State","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presupposition; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Power (physics); Sexual abuse; Brother; Narrative; Gender studies; Social work; Criminology; Law; Epistemology; Political science; History; Anthropology; Poison control; Medicine; Literature","score_opus":0.033320511216658376,"score_gpt":0.30675980042599527,"score_spread":0.2734392892093369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070992217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838845,0.008279255,0.00003802956,0.0033565615,0.00024389342,0.00010642587,0.00001150018,0.000010466986,0.0040693646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914572,0.0051638265,0.0003048214,0.0003854238,0.0005962335,0.0000011370408,0.0000016782209,0.0000075605185,0.0020820876],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987352,0.0001675015,0.0002295972,0.000083273226,0.00046705824,0.00031736316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991575,0.000097498334,0.00019714366,0.00005396333,0.00025243923,0.00024146093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008139314,0.00011416834,0.0001757941,0.00002779051,0.0010638353,0.00012740692,0.00013626876,0.000059556674,0.000096507356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027331023,0.00006220522,0.00003735918,0.00015982125,0.0003488344,0.00039903246,0.000043001208,0.0003025137,0.0000069274606],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033896264,0.00007992227,0.044904396,0.000013762661,0.00014621293,0.00000430564,0.9385712,0.0000048152333,0.00069373945,0.0017024566,0.0125856865,0.0012596016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006224663,0.00007499065,0.35634577,0.000016567787,0.000054155378,0.00011796537,0.037312564,0.0000013377952,0.000028764678,0.00045753794,0.60476774,0.00020015232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015144215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012760024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90125865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005176651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004167713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81822693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072348734","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00661.x","title":"ASSESSING MUTUAL PARTNER‐ABUSE CLAIMS IN CHILD CUSTODY AND ACCESS CASES","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lawson Health Research Institute; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Child custody; Power (physics); Domestic violence; Psychology; Child abuse; Criminology; Law; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; Medical emergency; Geography","score_opus":0.11242184705250083,"score_gpt":0.42720280270329497,"score_spread":0.3147809556507941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072348734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.705691,0.26832697,0.000009416898,0.01184266,0.00028770627,0.0010188377,0.0000059478525,0.00010980466,0.012707685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7147008,0.28299892,0.00012953872,0.0018350036,0.00018308242,0.00005059631,0.0000045381075,0.000009990649,0.000087498534],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822146,0.00026781234,0.0003542868,0.00032430762,0.0004147587,0.0004173492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928427,0.00018752748,0.00013201515,0.00014361783,0.000114376155,0.0001382114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000797266,0.00018773682,0.00047677688,0.000033067758,0.0007385476,0.00030535116,0.00029387826,0.00009895624,0.00003849774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045769438,0.00014902248,0.00007668307,0.0004798933,0.00033743153,0.0009783962,0.0001065641,0.00027388684,0.0000510125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005063499,0.0014861968,0.1618677,0.010033247,0.0004676658,0.002140308,0.15286934,0.0001718401,0.00018141506,0.0292648,0.053621195,0.5878456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081741996,0.000051809733,0.26237312,0.014138554,0.0001822045,0.000031827025,0.013806157,0.0000050773733,0.0000116310675,0.00039088394,0.7073367,0.00085461675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066467714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005191968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6537155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002770512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001088236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072697296","doi":"10.1163/1569163053084261","title":"Intersubjectivity and the `Revival of Death': Toward a Critique of Sovereign Individualism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Sociology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Intersubjectivity; Individualism; Spirituality; Narrative; Sociology; Feeling; Sovereignty; Inclusion (mineral); Expression (computer science); Psychoanalysis; Gender studies; Epistemology; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Social science; Medicine; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.059321723411530594,"score_gpt":0.3856121410315472,"score_spread":0.3262904176200166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072697296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92274386,0.0027124663,0.00025213268,0.056757838,0.00017813589,0.00031166492,0.000025952506,0.000032890377,0.016985064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980055,0.000361156,0.0005778306,0.0007204168,0.00026066598,0.000023892488,8.204152e-7,0.0000050591198,0.000044634824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979793,0.0010135764,0.00029509448,0.00018568814,0.00020747278,0.00031885513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99609756,0.0034628783,0.00007000302,0.00008985687,0.00020346059,0.00007621036],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012669947,0.000109960194,0.0004455674,0.000017313727,0.00034333952,0.000012298321,0.00022006583,0.00020745098,0.00013366164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006007436,0.00007148775,0.00013729649,0.000059157577,0.009120541,0.00011665612,0.00016462144,0.00025331546,0.000004814485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040500378,0.000046225854,0.0025546022,0.000034069122,0.00004712008,6.043e-7,0.071713135,2.5008106e-7,0.00007322235,0.9237145,0.00021133234,0.0015644458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051146173,0.0003975823,0.110351235,0.00014192646,0.00040906636,0.000009482422,0.14656106,0.0000685178,0.0016841213,0.7163485,0.018241335,0.00067252887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019837513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019431511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20736596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007418134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005351895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99357605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073405365","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.2.485","title":"The Québec <i>Crime Victims Compensation Act</i>: When the Clock Is Ticking against Victims of Intra-Familial Sexual Abuse","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sexual abuse; Humanities; Ethnology; Art; Sociology; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.020846689618878037,"score_gpt":0.25139539734196376,"score_spread":0.23054870772308572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073405365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86958605,0.004458662,0.0000046784808,0.11576428,0.0025869152,0.00037381434,0.000040225605,0.0000064091982,0.007178958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886718,0.0011399767,0.000049461778,0.0042001875,0.0014510412,0.000010326265,0.000001390266,0.000023450903,0.0044523943],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972253,0.00062204583,0.00072184805,0.00020410551,0.0003954207,0.0008312931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99642605,0.0013968244,0.0007664069,0.0002872633,0.00042041743,0.0007030288],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032361152,0.0002776856,0.00055052416,0.000047181784,0.0026501496,0.00041302285,0.00089905603,0.00019830026,0.00017823726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005847083,0.00015619044,0.00019860196,0.00024507084,0.004245002,0.0004073025,0.0000585033,0.0011632927,0.000015836345],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106370426,0.000028496057,0.0028736917,0.0000432275,0.00051807374,0.000021965709,0.8337016,0.00003500999,0.00016351437,0.14780225,0.002950746,0.011755009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020545924,0.00022214906,0.0073779514,0.00019220078,0.0002464401,0.00010100217,0.189829,0.00030419423,0.00008702588,0.014305407,0.784851,0.00042901517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32889104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8564418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7819003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007880808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013149347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073609679","doi":"10.1353/can.2005.0058","title":"The Canadian Federalist Experiment: From Defiant Monarchy to Reluctant Republic (review)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Historical Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Monarchy; Charter; Politics; Federalism; Constitution; Law; Supreme court; Ideology; Scrutiny; History; The Republic; Political science; Economic history; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.05492002141800827,"score_gpt":0.31712500840416646,"score_spread":0.2622049869861582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073609679","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004010997,0.5794383,5.1014774e-7,0.38543427,0.00041423854,0.00084360054,0.00002946053,0.000031185828,0.0337683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014411903,0.88233405,0.00046479798,0.081069484,0.0010448092,0.0005383799,0.000031437,0.000037691727,0.020067459],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99673146,0.00037758824,0.00057862187,0.00048567273,0.0006641452,0.0011625265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99561805,0.0001744397,0.0001235955,0.00049428456,0.00029409016,0.0032955282],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010421225,0.00026487006,0.0005520375,0.0000600606,0.0044822437,0.00014507347,0.00084755564,0.000115834475,0.0010877147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003527827,0.00018942774,0.00023766096,0.00069772615,0.00013715898,0.00015733005,0.00004946358,0.00031529897,0.0009005337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.3897803e-7,0.0000057639636,0.000040928506,0.000081416714,0.000019521673,0.00001857097,0.0013472758,1.3244727e-7,8.6923376e-7,0.0048988243,0.9021249,0.09146109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041092873,0.000012124894,0.00030292146,0.0011519003,0.000041339463,0.0000011883508,0.00010823244,6.912953e-7,5.841236e-7,0.000045714965,0.9980076,0.00028661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99679804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3043648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05013086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021335746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074705882","doi":"10.7202/042227ar","title":"L'abus de pouvoir des représentants légaux dans le droit familial du Québec","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Power of attorney; Power (physics); Law; TUTOR; Abuse of power; Duty; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.01159349312615602,"score_gpt":0.26017123278531357,"score_spread":0.24857773965915755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074705882","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9599407,0.00041181518,0.0009904043,0.0044718124,0.00016874561,0.0002490854,0.000015601572,0.0002547448,0.033497144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767371,0.00033198655,0.0020894744,0.00075080723,0.0009467618,0.00003595479,0.000005152065,0.000027836833,0.019074935],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780375,0.00022570365,0.0002873741,0.00038717734,0.00042892876,0.00086704677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903387,0.0002313345,0.00011370644,0.00020979202,0.00010227513,0.0003090295],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066277373,0.0002181911,0.0002874798,0.00004297022,0.0024530885,0.00011630445,0.0004830113,0.0003028016,0.00013464272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009218667,0.00022140521,0.00020033329,0.00026220188,0.0023162581,0.00033675903,0.00007175161,0.00039115248,0.00013217985],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120939636,0.0003134684,0.21408576,0.000042556712,0.0002728329,0.00012759383,0.6445379,0.0003198636,0.0047662063,0.0719661,0.009902497,0.053544287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020129979,0.00012069872,0.46168748,0.00009554584,0.000189164,0.000049359558,0.23800357,0.00056930643,0.00463222,0.018777823,0.27242,0.0014418516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44047356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6021051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40653434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073741684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053232216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075057681","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00660.x","title":"MOVIN' ON","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05976005348880054,"score_gpt":0.3591633051035167,"score_spread":0.29940325161471615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075057681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016422166,0.41911343,0.00003328191,0.11304899,0.0010634197,0.0017346711,0.000012164188,0.00037589174,0.448196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24946856,0.7164765,0.0007072942,0.027500441,0.000706775,0.00011454333,0.000006251568,0.000020771002,0.0049988627],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998727,0.000120437704,0.0001908401,0.00019555085,0.00047393306,0.00029222041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994901,0.00007436009,0.00007090814,0.00015247667,0.00010391134,0.00010828412],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052975473,0.00012374148,0.00027702836,0.00001167279,0.00053625175,0.00003272359,0.00024049876,0.000059990387,0.00014467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005019888,0.000088848996,0.0001334476,0.00022601295,0.00016273589,0.00009987797,0.00003655928,0.00015089793,0.0015893179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011839034,0.00037274463,0.0007549102,0.0016251984,0.00017345669,0.00006166318,0.017066153,0.000041953903,0.00013760186,0.2133407,0.58680725,0.17960653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012166014,0.000026376376,0.005473716,0.0017135765,0.00002780032,2.2648734e-7,0.00049584795,1.1924568e-7,0.0000037969567,0.00050380506,0.99149346,0.00013958571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030570067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040948237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44319713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003187573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008382302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99918807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077420415","doi":"10.5539/ach.v6n1p83","title":"The Aesthetic University, the Market University, and the Battle for the Soul of Beida","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Culture and History","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Battle; Transcendence (philosophy); Aesthetics; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Art; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.010780960904812729,"score_gpt":0.20536349837202145,"score_spread":0.19458253746720872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077420415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019216118,0.05052983,0.000052174586,0.30103877,0.0015332301,0.002914896,0.000028461012,0.00007868604,0.6246078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84752214,0.0062671597,0.000052657517,0.00024445142,0.00015452642,0.000006854779,8.318318e-7,0.0000067154465,0.14574465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932605,0.00022364242,0.00005722747,0.0001032918,0.0001418186,0.00014795498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898505,0.0006886814,0.000075366785,0.00011798476,0.000096910044,0.000035987003],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038189723,0.000074898395,0.00009685693,0.0000066194043,0.0028552138,0.00003700611,0.00034801805,0.000055051936,0.000051657524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008552968,0.000028888724,0.00007457303,0.00006273679,0.003078638,0.00009972322,0.000103172104,0.00011516263,0.0000037624352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000617171,0.0000128774345,0.00030109918,0.000010831454,0.000094605675,7.419857e-7,0.20126764,3.2716176e-7,0.0000099784265,0.16204928,0.61874574,0.01744513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027831836,0.000012050577,0.0033994995,0.0000045702022,0.00006322711,8.7480265e-7,0.14758721,0.0000066436855,4.6286135e-7,0.0003492145,0.8482524,0.00004553901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005739437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008700422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.828306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011946189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036112546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078745783","doi":"10.1111/j.0265-8240.2004.00166.x","title":"Regulation of Cohabitation and Marriage in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Supreme court; Law; Constitutional right; Argument (complex analysis); Institution; Marital status; Political science; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.014887897701583329,"score_gpt":0.2938061912706551,"score_spread":0.2789182935690718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078745783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97037834,0.00008983941,0.000001148951,0.009367794,0.000037270816,0.00011224196,0.0000032424352,0.0000067888695,0.020003319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994137,0.000034689478,0.00009914735,0.00023974621,0.000074149895,0.0000036997683,0.000001134449,0.0000018448958,0.00013183086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995549,0.00003759815,0.00009369469,0.000060134746,0.00014144191,0.000112258815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998335,0.000031379728,0.00004083919,0.0000305594,0.000031613537,0.00003205421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008471831,0.000034947163,0.00007158698,0.000009214826,0.0001299632,0.000008269484,0.00003626583,0.000022874754,0.000009448071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012499656,0.00003161185,0.000008745903,0.00013967715,0.00012251319,0.000091507434,0.000012133097,0.000027306263,9.772614e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034440457,0.0000068342847,0.019144887,0.000010772664,0.000004647359,6.012693e-7,0.019606723,0.00012256858,0.00046337533,0.9587009,0.00005688862,0.0018783401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003313733,0.000008514507,0.96604025,0.000024245113,0.0000031936995,1.15837004e-7,0.0035968737,0.0000048565357,0.0003633267,0.023887949,0.005668514,0.00007076875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9990174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94689536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006544214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029435544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17112891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083640649","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0019","title":"The Promise of Brooks v. Canada Safeway Ltd : Those Who Bear Children Should Not Be Disadvantaged","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Geography; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029629888095780432,"score_gpt":0.27190350239811306,"score_spread":0.24227361430233263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083640649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6680025,0.019129312,8.1137773e-7,0.30153608,0.00077579496,0.0004763496,0.00021012664,0.0000038822004,0.009865196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9647676,0.0030087633,0.0000395359,0.0038211579,0.00094913156,0.000011502851,0.000002083839,0.00002443844,0.02737583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968315,0.0006616325,0.00073098025,0.00021482918,0.00049339706,0.0010676981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969585,0.0007896994,0.00063037773,0.0002434328,0.0002527281,0.0011252816],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025838714,0.0002996853,0.0007191734,0.000041085525,0.0019894412,0.00022503556,0.00081458286,0.00014741985,0.0001326044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005548796,0.00018807812,0.00022539771,0.00023772764,0.002873705,0.00034453726,0.000069431815,0.0007816709,0.0000036531565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003555576,0.000062838095,0.0065854965,0.00011534411,0.0014820631,0.00010809022,0.39051044,0.00022727487,0.000020656002,0.5398244,0.021716088,0.03899175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026480537,0.00017239271,0.019957684,0.00046701683,0.00022569655,0.000121448495,0.04296055,0.00003919714,0.00008565383,0.0057852697,0.92703575,0.0005013156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8754819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99480027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90531963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021613005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020635275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084412400","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v17i6.06","title":"The liability of churches for the historical sexual assault of children by priests","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Law; Supreme court; Liability; Damages; Test (biology); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Political science; Tort; Psychology","score_opus":0.012536297173417258,"score_gpt":0.2760796712263531,"score_spread":0.2635433740529358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084412400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86401874,0.07013264,0.0075535662,0.04796559,0.0016683432,0.004507195,0.00011645006,0.00031274895,0.00372473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928061,0.003245219,0.0004262652,0.00008586277,0.0012589269,0.00018861602,0.00001272584,0.00007680291,0.0018994793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918478,0.0014581531,0.0016201179,0.0006646582,0.0020297216,0.002379548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991065,0.0047308765,0.0016406542,0.00092062505,0.0012575226,0.00038527284],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008844893,0.0006358954,0.0011212209,0.000059698712,0.0051621036,0.00025207238,0.0022615958,0.0004144045,0.000034599998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004415803,0.0003784542,0.000763954,0.0005897837,0.0028187681,0.0004948807,0.00023497449,0.0018480008,0.0000049203236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00303488,0.0024267505,0.0399913,0.00033880468,0.007922441,0.0000024488359,0.03663822,0.00087897346,0.025352918,0.6272091,0.081851825,0.1743523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037969083,0.002549027,0.0057877456,0.000082766855,0.0009837827,0.00003936908,0.01127956,0.00027164788,0.007704955,0.011716619,0.9546256,0.0011619844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012368339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015185434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8727738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003578119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008122436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084749280","doi":"10.1177/000842980002900406","title":"Same-sex relationships, religious traditions, marriage and the law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Legalization; Sociology; Homosexuality; State (computer science); Law; Same sex; Gender studies; Variety (cybernetics); Political science","score_opus":0.08810149047896293,"score_gpt":0.3692927127770868,"score_spread":0.2811912222981239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084749280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47610116,0.18065025,0.0000034480631,0.050578997,0.000953858,0.0016192505,0.000019194478,0.0003959769,0.2896779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67067343,0.3255247,0.00045775302,0.0013124079,0.0002520076,0.00017488375,0.0000015068222,0.00001199842,0.0015913342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99589914,0.0010696432,0.0006715919,0.00067907723,0.00092012197,0.0007604438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99575794,0.003487121,0.00017169314,0.00031005923,0.00014372508,0.00012945686],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031053952,0.0003276734,0.0005700163,0.00010773808,0.0060818144,0.00026535566,0.0006998876,0.00016580969,0.00004683444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001963695,0.00020793892,0.0001530366,0.001182563,0.01424836,0.00049551367,0.00013530663,0.00049242406,0.00009459076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009731179,0.00008362334,0.007385029,0.00004434218,0.00014146615,0.000027815386,0.22834365,0.00023551619,0.000005512875,0.6165795,0.14578073,0.0012755005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018544117,0.00013525327,0.0033424215,0.00031550846,0.000116341034,0.000021215259,0.1922678,0.000033800592,0.000024641415,0.19464554,0.60642767,0.0008154111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027789226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024321262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46064693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002561832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015909631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99521214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084906033","doi":"10.1080/00071005.2012.742276","title":"<i>Law, Religious Freedoms and Education in Europe</i>. Edited by Myriam Hunter-Henin","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Educational Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02040286517791079,"score_gpt":0.33079078239016935,"score_spread":0.31038791721225856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084906033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7518826,0.21790855,0.0000013284689,0.017806621,0.003082173,0.00020365806,0.000013483694,0.000009446719,0.009092115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9529747,0.040183395,0.0006150126,0.0006828141,0.003334788,0.000022159427,0.0000066801954,0.000012137571,0.0021683217],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833244,0.00024753355,0.0004870993,0.00013646812,0.00045554875,0.00034089657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790174,0.00052082055,0.0003279532,0.00004519167,0.0010226496,0.00018163312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085804,0.00012760331,0.0002969964,0.0000566445,0.0006706325,0.00011772665,0.00017611208,0.00006038354,0.000046408975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002638169,0.00012819686,0.000056008616,0.00031591443,0.00065039075,0.0007041669,0.00006840208,0.00023911208,0.000010793502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019332423,0.0006986949,0.089266025,0.000028737772,0.00017542252,0.000002878803,0.037346497,0.0000017719792,0.00010346175,0.0077572013,0.8534317,0.011168263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068018294,0.00007080946,0.23435086,0.00055301236,0.00007718957,0.00017760362,0.05939989,2.965809e-7,0.00003252892,0.0027799879,0.70151514,0.0003625218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060199234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026056105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20109206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029991393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028692954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9100364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085046257","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2008.00020.x","title":"Aboriginal policy reform and the subsidiarity principle: A case study of the division of matrimonial real property on Canadian Indian reserves","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Legislation; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.046500890073287005,"score_gpt":0.34658730027169066,"score_spread":0.30008641019840365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085046257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9517906,0.000018342711,5.283265e-8,0.03776841,0.00009585921,0.0010880526,0.000066361215,0.0000096683525,0.009162699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989693,0.00007826178,0.000007528525,0.000076729935,0.00015443248,0.00004010635,0.0000057191905,0.0000069798543,0.00066091947],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981816,0.0004248348,0.00031821406,0.0002092774,0.00045557795,0.0004105326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986265,0.00007501052,0.00019743046,0.00027279562,0.00028218768,0.00054609013],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008381873,0.00013137789,0.000202378,0.0001441215,0.0026932901,0.00008540876,0.0003277099,0.00012371868,0.000015062246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005929294,0.00006658276,0.00005277004,0.00064885407,0.0010842932,0.0002579541,0.00002200076,0.00021380765,0.0000010260346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012510076,0.00025193085,0.49863765,0.000044511886,0.00012451517,0.0005614917,0.24035844,0.0000016457199,0.000007672497,0.25618267,0.00090677623,0.0027976113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017909908,0.0006144507,0.83733785,0.000033750883,0.000038020025,0.00014758612,0.09907706,0.000029732959,0.00003576681,0.00014011655,0.060446113,0.0003085428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9972843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33870023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014745799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008897986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086132450","doi":"10.5840/envirophil20118219","title":"Ideas and Practices in the Critique of Consumerism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Philosophy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consumerism; Applied philosophy; Environmental ethics; General interest; Sociology; Contemporary philosophy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06369820562877371,"score_gpt":0.32403736290837,"score_spread":0.2603391572795963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086132450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9238601,0.0011613758,6.272772e-7,0.0039443905,0.000043544886,0.00023540518,0.0000067702576,0.000008055393,0.070739746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986252,0.000747191,0.00018131592,0.0003159507,0.000066018976,0.000017563323,0.000001013761,0.0000036748286,0.00004208237],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919045,0.0002208822,0.00012642286,0.00012521021,0.00021080837,0.00012621432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960893,0.00014265171,0.00013565941,0.00007792521,0.0000026857606,0.000032138883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033591184,0.00007134328,0.00009900426,0.000013778248,0.00021063547,0.000010290093,0.00014863905,0.000046297144,0.00014823262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011193774,0.000049637056,0.000027824752,0.00004617358,0.00090616435,0.00021632624,0.000051919367,0.00010932228,0.000017732216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061026316,0.0006256953,0.409296,0.00003559983,0.00007316798,0.00003170644,0.4294747,2.8931387e-7,0.0016178228,0.1559324,0.00037895062,0.002472626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004358371,0.00010470472,0.8453005,0.000026004154,0.000035925284,0.0000029803368,0.067909084,0.0000012790786,0.00039769124,0.07158798,0.013971604,0.00022643353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003915631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022756662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4360045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032504282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000045747506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5919289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086577566","doi":"10.7202/1018392ar","title":"Two Roads Diverged: A Comparative Analysis of Indigenous Rights in a North American Constitutional Context","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Indigenous; Parliament; Context (archaeology); Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Indian country; Constitutional law; Political economy; Public administration; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.0370546408088331,"score_gpt":0.32390931528107086,"score_spread":0.2868546744722378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086577566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94476366,0.00009378708,0.000010543202,0.0002278611,0.000108393004,0.00023647376,0.00005877101,0.000013291416,0.054487232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99946505,0.000033595898,0.00026123,0.00009966027,0.00006994047,0.000014407519,0.000005263058,0.000001539923,0.000049306644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981497,0.00035148914,0.00041874932,0.00015846893,0.000552083,0.0003695346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987419,0.00017277563,0.0003809668,0.000067686546,0.00045461705,0.00018201995],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029817168,0.00013436416,0.00055821065,0.00014289221,0.0036794825,0.000059717036,0.00024171459,0.00003093314,0.0003834038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004957996,0.000097443524,0.00020244093,0.0011925121,0.0025859529,0.00035168248,0.000048264184,0.0002674033,0.00004071693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004479669,0.00036035816,0.563162,0.0000032246767,0.0025341404,0.000036311627,0.07780435,0.0014816336,0.000024958692,0.35217422,0.00018711011,0.00218689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010318175,0.00011621824,0.892375,0.000020571184,0.00040515995,0.000005891141,0.029117031,0.000114932234,0.000057072437,0.00047859756,0.075907715,0.00036999196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47390527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9131936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43928835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040530114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000287128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087519073","doi":"10.1017/cls.2014.2","title":"La recherche de l’inclusion scolaire à travers les recours offerts aux familles : perspective comparative canadienne dans un contexte francophone minoritaire","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Francophone University Association; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; French; Political science; Sociology; Ethnology; Art","score_opus":0.065643415565174,"score_gpt":0.3204312423965508,"score_spread":0.2547878268313768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087519073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9229495,0.017007953,0.00013526613,0.023783216,0.0019324106,0.00045225877,0.0002657173,0.00002028569,0.033453416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987017,0.0035630881,0.0012589892,0.0021640332,0.0009865392,0.000014730742,0.000010129697,0.000057698948,0.004927819],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937575,0.0027116674,0.0007958462,0.0005964694,0.00027374492,0.0018647733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919977,0.0022800593,0.00069875404,0.00024112838,0.0012994625,0.0034828943],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005617109,0.0006199038,0.0012938441,0.00007982383,0.005971461,0.00019998656,0.0006990286,0.0012337959,0.00019390616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014148729,0.00065318524,0.000788656,0.000606036,0.004860749,0.00058089575,0.00010600941,0.0022222197,0.0000037907366],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019419816,0.000037332207,0.0007166438,0.0001073648,0.00061892276,0.00015334725,0.7680074,0.000046801022,0.00007977033,0.20920926,0.0018354835,0.019168252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014324386,0.00036832446,0.011714425,0.0008528803,0.00035238787,0.00020710175,0.86530876,0.00027771475,0.000033724813,0.018959844,0.099702284,0.0007900869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94804704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99487853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19024941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0150860995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043222643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087543695","doi":"10.1080/09539960500165234","title":"Challenging statutory limitations on children's education rights: a re-examination of the Canadian Supreme Court Decision in<i>Auton</i>","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education and the Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Statutory law; Law; Political science; Democracy; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Fundamental rights; Mental health; Public administration; Sociology; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.022869122643670785,"score_gpt":0.2944852770101881,"score_spread":0.2716161543665173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087543695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76347536,0.0009909914,0.0000035886112,0.09313126,0.0009825602,0.00090845814,0.000007059372,0.000021577847,0.14047918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970777,0.00015705991,0.00012362964,0.0012316101,0.00024349267,0.000046770143,0.000010035287,0.0000041519443,0.0011055318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990515,0.0002549403,0.00016735958,0.0001263682,0.0002533425,0.00014648648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992597,0.0003018736,0.000095502066,0.00013153684,0.0001543706,0.000057014186],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059009145,0.00007387746,0.00008716208,0.000056492783,0.0014106674,0.00006319608,0.00015500776,0.000057189252,0.000023988801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022463888,0.000044840664,0.000034870078,0.00018823946,0.0003866987,0.00019362704,0.000014888059,0.00012566257,0.000008686829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005314643,0.00013732715,0.00075592456,0.0000030215476,0.000007705664,9.341905e-9,0.11167782,0.0000561508,0.000001533887,0.8603144,0.0015085456,0.025532223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007424315,0.000016970738,0.64304084,0.0001664369,0.000031574804,5.8590007e-7,0.039437886,0.000075060016,0.000054899894,0.011201755,0.305048,0.00018356732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25488046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8410602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8491127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000458723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004715404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088265647","doi":"10.1163/1571811053890416","title":"The Equality and Liberty Rights of the Destitute: A Canadian Charter Case Example","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal on Minority and Group Rights","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03181811384957506,"score_gpt":0.30469633270134133,"score_spread":0.2728782188517663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088265647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97531027,0.00032552518,0.0000057987577,0.016203,0.000768937,0.0001251584,0.0000257336,0.0000057926,0.007229797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99715805,0.000120153076,0.0001032464,0.00032875707,0.0008083656,0.0000028519466,7.989993e-7,0.0000015986893,0.0014761527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988386,0.00020643753,0.00021061051,0.00011912053,0.0004234904,0.0002017473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915683,0.00025985172,0.00012768943,0.000070101334,0.00019522538,0.00019030487],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060093903,0.000091407994,0.00009971188,0.000029232382,0.0028800967,0.00021986447,0.00026725492,0.00006377603,0.00005289632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006460585,0.000041989006,0.00006243549,0.00005092673,0.0005411171,0.00026685317,0.000043405336,0.00024053044,0.0000047744356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009656207,0.00016878392,0.014796005,0.000007168446,0.0003872746,0.00034141427,0.052664638,0.000005254299,0.00004567706,0.89640206,0.0051857783,0.029899368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039375815,0.000029398258,0.05869361,0.000029728071,0.000022523509,0.00031473066,0.0005563709,0.000029671743,0.00004989206,0.015103415,0.9246584,0.00011845955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46955833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91899127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9194727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022127148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052912223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99841803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089225735","doi":"10.7202/1027576ar","title":"Test d’ADN et filiation à la lumière des développements récents : dilemmes et paradoxes","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.028952610658015215,"score_gpt":0.30501720536558974,"score_spread":0.2760645947075745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089225735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8945833,0.0022991176,0.0003374621,0.036929283,0.0010124543,0.00063958525,0.00013008463,0.00018216083,0.06388655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9698533,0.005192627,0.002636654,0.0008118484,0.0006383364,0.00007976611,0.00005867143,0.000039876202,0.020688951],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966719,0.00091628893,0.00048254986,0.0005228314,0.00049729884,0.00090912957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978306,0.0011307736,0.00031700532,0.0002513077,0.00019200226,0.00027830864],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015554063,0.00029845134,0.00047248005,0.00005051151,0.0008636777,0.00026595575,0.00044664223,0.00034205962,0.00030292707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022290698,0.00038202794,0.00022763271,0.00047133074,0.00078190083,0.00071275234,0.0001853453,0.00040239235,0.000554764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024072893,0.0007965868,0.6841475,0.000762668,0.00026045195,0.000030414654,0.10155465,0.0002290601,0.00063730695,0.13572301,0.0155742895,0.060259983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008939215,0.00015628987,0.7609522,0.0009751119,0.00017830935,0.000011812785,0.004819837,0.00086242176,0.00019295738,0.0463403,0.18381898,0.0007978901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005412917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004451283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16824469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082223583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009613438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091205608","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905220103","title":"Shifting Boundaries: Aboriginal Identity, Pluralist Theory and the Politics of Self-Government","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Politics; Government (linguistics); Identity politics; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Political economy; Aesthetics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012664613682177632,"score_gpt":0.3177184029392749,"score_spread":0.30505378925709725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091205608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95698094,0.0005939799,0.0000767801,0.026334792,0.00040698043,0.00012119072,0.000018822171,0.000006341124,0.015460174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979126,0.000016836822,0.00060350465,0.0006978917,0.0005389583,6.306106e-7,4.2802554e-8,0.0000029710277,0.00022656178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972188,0.0002509725,0.00036571067,0.000118533724,0.00111401,0.00093195937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974839,0.0005679864,0.00018682898,0.00008977649,0.00040775244,0.0012637223],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005122108,0.000094079354,0.00021269305,0.000051795967,0.003149318,0.0006044574,0.0006724029,0.000043470136,0.00008076668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033687612,0.000059394126,0.00007774687,0.00029465006,0.013904044,0.00081700017,0.000043902444,0.00021605958,0.0000034001594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004613345,0.0000063359025,0.0034008045,0.000004437832,0.000013287397,0.0000047785284,0.02134231,0.0000010850518,0.000010963235,0.97497237,0.00011194153,0.00012707198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018363465,0.00016366367,0.26219714,0.00019134994,0.0002532029,0.00009291194,0.0950376,0.00008458612,0.0006331548,0.3239405,0.3150277,0.0005418445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22077022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16534592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6510319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016990583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031432002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99814844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091857827","doi":"10.7202/1000618ar","title":"Was Duplessis Right?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Royal Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Law; Politics; Appeal; State (computer science); Pluralism (philosophy); Surprise; Sociology; Persecution; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06726963279502593,"score_gpt":0.3042984447804934,"score_spread":0.23702881198546746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091857827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025374567,0.00024226157,0.000010547392,0.0017023307,0.00087356026,0.00009363767,0.0000075437147,0.000073773954,0.97162175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961668,0.00028579877,0.0014972993,0.00024050643,0.0004858255,0.0000041624926,3.1487298e-7,0.000009031733,0.0013102582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998582,0.00020291985,0.00022875867,0.00013209076,0.00043134825,0.00042290252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929106,0.00006224376,0.00013587871,0.00007944021,0.00018971828,0.00024166076],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006103424,0.00011270642,0.00018563704,0.000020271418,0.010227687,0.00007170308,0.00030336945,0.00008764179,0.0029519976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014576,0.00007774424,0.00015084009,0.00012147347,0.0003958428,0.00038611365,0.000057070305,0.00027585626,0.00027501507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002417083,0.00012877048,0.0024206857,0.000005598671,0.00015929602,0.00012928569,0.02275528,0.0000012010717,0.00004993755,0.9605916,0.004384314,0.009349843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020175599,0.000027270435,0.005231021,0.000018016115,0.00002934517,0.000015118004,0.004899778,0.000001071387,0.00038325827,0.0030812616,0.98595107,0.00016103659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01910819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050201412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9815667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019957928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007617253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99795943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092317233","doi":"10.7202/1005136ar","title":"An Exemption for Sincere Believers: The Challenge of Alberta v. Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Sincerity; Context (archaeology); Test (biology); Charter; Government (linguistics); Political science; Balancing test; Sociology; Law and economics; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07338476443723861,"score_gpt":0.3212583960577365,"score_spread":0.24787363162049786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092317233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5655149,0.00086820615,0.0000860685,0.018025776,0.0017145373,0.0016472044,0.00014790696,0.00005287479,0.41194248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99865,0.00022549475,0.0006438259,0.00006395061,0.00023263694,0.000010877407,0.0000014445964,0.000008313849,0.00016341862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883413,0.00020581168,0.00029662016,0.000118799355,0.00029553976,0.00024909145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902904,0.00013964878,0.0003468483,0.000116139636,0.000278994,0.00008930263],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007646239,0.00009812246,0.0002123276,0.000014725545,0.0026341483,0.000019731706,0.00034559323,0.0000981628,0.00021745288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000106037965,0.00006233103,0.00012822161,0.00006926282,0.00048583403,0.0003486417,0.000033190794,0.00013364409,0.0000028363027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004948329,0.0006569241,0.0031627892,0.000095669624,0.00042018914,0.0000038912203,0.24661572,0.000012583728,0.0016336301,0.7230085,0.0012609952,0.022634245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020582562,0.0017771595,0.021475548,0.00023825301,0.00025526376,0.000009952081,0.05686655,0.000039855084,0.0045276284,0.013894766,0.8983363,0.00052045746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04800645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2295133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8970753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009580901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011007292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99866426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092488963","doi":"10.1017/s0008423906299967","title":"Calling Power to Account: Law, Reparations, and the Chinese Head Tax Case","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Supreme court; Power (physics); Political science; Head (geology); Common law; Sociology","score_opus":0.018335500511273705,"score_gpt":0.3364242935583813,"score_spread":0.31808879304710763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092488963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9410842,0.0003720897,0.000041635234,0.039976742,0.00030685656,0.0001441898,0.000011085524,0.0000049713058,0.018058205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973232,0.0000031796544,0.00034666137,0.0016769392,0.0003853344,0.0000021553167,7.5853805e-8,0.0000028728964,0.00025957276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825126,0.00010704359,0.0002678682,0.00013769006,0.00043687856,0.00079924555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977864,0.00027418227,0.00007014599,0.00008783542,0.0004231594,0.0013582739],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019996474,0.00008522154,0.00015935747,0.00007295089,0.0028189311,0.00043971054,0.0003282196,0.000039420433,0.000066650566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025546176,0.000049123133,0.000055427125,0.00048562168,0.004092201,0.00041732987,0.000028076634,0.00016514483,0.000011724884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032886776,0.0000036182255,0.0021022577,8.2870196e-7,0.0000028420552,0.000181867,0.006461801,0.000014390647,0.000018235563,0.990507,0.0006460235,0.00005785373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020618245,0.00024046587,0.6510773,0.00017644819,0.00008516745,0.0029681562,0.050830357,0.00023310422,0.00009636156,0.12435242,0.16688628,0.0009921457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82860225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86939085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86615455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063483446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010084764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99861807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093014733","doi":"10.7202/1027131ar","title":"L’impact de la règle religieuse sur la disparition du lien conjugal en droit civil français et québécois","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Ethnology; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.00889556373042252,"score_gpt":0.26598045592137953,"score_spread":0.25708489219095704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093014733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87966853,0.0033117526,0.00042969687,0.013002856,0.00055117364,0.00045963458,0.00012325606,0.00022532158,0.10222778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98302996,0.008386497,0.0005797463,0.0006089313,0.001711572,0.000078886245,0.000035004443,0.00007089771,0.0054984814],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949452,0.0021497498,0.00053907355,0.00063217105,0.0005236367,0.0012101309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955331,0.0030162036,0.00029881872,0.00039767276,0.00021193102,0.0005422898],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028332612,0.00039235476,0.00073425897,0.000072611896,0.0007408624,0.00036979892,0.00063646847,0.00078714394,0.00044179993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035271475,0.0005005881,0.0005473845,0.00050315086,0.0011054428,0.00074824726,0.00019562061,0.00083078677,0.00045975292],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015753375,0.0013861811,0.4941859,0.0007919139,0.0006881707,0.00025712856,0.22405422,0.0013151204,0.0011311348,0.18803358,0.068677194,0.01932193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014043746,0.00026933098,0.6900338,0.00074015255,0.00031797265,0.00009741245,0.002604462,0.0018695147,0.000097971744,0.021826444,0.2796911,0.0010474921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29814956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084711626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22144975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017301413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034754962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094864765","doi":"10.7202/042901ar","title":"L'objet des droits constitutionnels à l'égalité","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Social equality; Dignity; Charter; Human rights; Political science; Gender equality; Context (archaeology); Law; Sociology; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Racial equality; Gender studies; Racism","score_opus":0.018152580466572595,"score_gpt":0.2810107019854449,"score_spread":0.26285812151887233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094864765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83592385,0.00069777755,0.001396501,0.0032987725,0.00016735875,0.00024574553,0.000016037084,0.000249879,0.15800409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806467,0.00021619821,0.0032315226,0.0006971976,0.000570307,0.000028238592,0.0000054982474,0.0000103289985,0.014593965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984755,0.00013908408,0.00020894778,0.00023835678,0.00034989303,0.0005882033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929124,0.0001704044,0.00007294685,0.00012270676,0.000118650816,0.00022405753],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053995533,0.00014685516,0.00019840067,0.000037752237,0.0019597097,0.00011080126,0.00027140387,0.00024264459,0.00031580077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071635476,0.00014118548,0.00012126118,0.00024863827,0.0029079847,0.00033512936,0.00003369496,0.00028231693,0.0003119642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001548681,0.00007345832,0.011958483,0.000022216367,0.00009839725,0.000018044284,0.112037726,0.00014662633,0.00045914375,0.82845724,0.0036110452,0.04310211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010401706,0.000053560354,0.04813912,0.00009290356,0.000112175956,0.000016137688,0.04529997,0.00010631175,0.0013330837,0.06094775,0.8419513,0.0009075082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039973077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005369533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8383403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019693384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000093998526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095307881","doi":"10.1007/s10691-014-9263-3","title":"Sexual Assault and the Meaning of Power and Authority for Women with Mental Disabilities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Doctrine; Criminology; Psychology; Sexual violence; Power (physics); Meaning (existential); Economic Justice; Public international law; Criminal law; Law; Social psychology; International law; Political science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.031581546580396004,"score_gpt":0.32370811175730513,"score_spread":0.2921265651769091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095307881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9704713,0.0011532429,0.0000070042684,0.0056800605,0.00016665031,0.0005682202,0.000030100548,0.00003829759,0.02188508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968406,0.00011632874,0.0002911392,0.00008777863,0.0001329328,0.0001475628,6.264115e-7,0.000007348418,0.0023756686],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987434,0.0001753325,0.00019497385,0.00022952224,0.0003429338,0.00031379578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981639,0.0014258499,0.00011020906,0.0000800484,0.0001576557,0.00006237841],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013551777,0.0001542048,0.00040555574,0.000010015769,0.0017769935,0.000084679035,0.00010773869,0.000050218514,0.0000059482777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016405158,0.00008247909,0.000028567936,0.00007139608,0.0044397903,0.00013331785,0.00015420809,0.00010177571,4.885576e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039328623,0.00003316104,0.023544692,0.00010894286,0.0003797981,1.9554284e-7,0.8026786,4.1677364e-7,0.000029079793,0.16992329,0.0012969874,0.0016115457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013190749,0.00040587943,0.011187811,0.000028284021,0.00005072793,9.794793e-7,0.8740916,0.000009113855,0.000026899559,0.00231217,0.11038413,0.00018330016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016710133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002554212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16761112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010897621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019648543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095388448","doi":"10.1163/187633712x631246","title":"Enforcement of Divorce Judgments in Jewish Courts in Israel: The Interaction Between Religious and Constitutional Law*","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Middle East Law and Governance","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Wife; Supreme court; Spouse; Jurisdiction; Adjudication; Judaism; Sanctions; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.043390873074170354,"score_gpt":0.28735224388677394,"score_spread":0.24396137081260358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095388448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95884496,0.0042363405,0.000011886688,0.001188406,0.00021198553,0.00025344273,0.000034964174,0.000008281113,0.035209723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989579,0.00045847314,0.000021510088,0.00026159378,0.0001095647,0.000013550604,0.0000021784922,0.000002052246,0.000173212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920034,0.00006253476,0.00017571908,0.00010884018,0.00024426533,0.00020826749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967664,0.0000895397,0.00011094021,0.000047922444,0.000028888275,0.000046078814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030726707,0.00007664256,0.00013524825,0.0000055898313,0.0002376367,0.000024854411,0.000069591544,0.00004459359,0.000009455913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054166816,0.00005588099,0.000018780773,0.00006067784,0.0013250143,0.00030060174,0.00006708818,0.00010004406,0.0000026131474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009564381,0.000029236775,0.26044622,0.0000120986615,0.00001064222,4.8780163e-7,0.009948587,0.000007393038,0.000008837619,0.72890115,0.000075810494,0.00054995494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019365626,0.000069072674,0.54891634,0.000633514,0.00004351038,0.0000031749237,0.02153288,0.000045958892,0.00022795184,0.004647957,0.42149553,0.00044754986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05150545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021184066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72425324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014625347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013657063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99667674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096129482","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2280","title":"New Dialectical Rules For Ambiguity","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Argument (complex analysis); Grice; Argumentative; Epistemology; Conversation; Dialectic; Context (archaeology); Argumentation theory; Set (abstract data type); Linguistics; Computer science; Pragmatics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05556845093921646,"score_gpt":0.34174667509680223,"score_spread":0.28617822415758576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096129482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20887838,0.00020363886,0.0004520964,0.00642166,0.0005317751,0.0007279259,0.000019361065,0.00030754504,0.7824576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9384805,0.00023876222,0.0086672185,0.0017073712,0.001612595,0.000060859256,0.000013525751,0.0000086637565,0.049210533],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990148,0.000029481842,0.00017362312,0.000110501875,0.00024094242,0.00043063582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995322,0.00014689648,0.000033619744,0.00006756056,0.00006196655,0.00015771089],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002513297,0.000097898184,0.0001428918,0.000012161603,0.00086196425,0.0000979382,0.00019983145,0.000108644126,0.0028530273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003796887,0.00007278442,0.00010669776,0.000101526435,0.00020184816,0.00037023437,0.000028809132,0.000095127274,0.000839586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017358166,0.00006516936,0.0034715168,0.000024941522,0.00006572385,0.0000037940752,0.034292165,0.000054411576,0.000020036596,0.25995305,0.05335767,0.64851797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032747426,0.00007706452,0.022978608,0.000004541015,0.000012965179,4.5064633e-7,0.0009667395,0.000022330993,0.000025131016,0.0059690764,0.9694495,0.00016609403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005021078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011495082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91609186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008123669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000822025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097967677","doi":"10.7202/015782ar","title":"Droits des enfants, droits des parents","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Enfances Familles Générations","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Ethnology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03600898672045326,"score_gpt":0.3430070830882461,"score_spread":0.30699809636779285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097967677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65290385,0.030172637,0.0011501919,0.0012762535,0.0031760796,0.0006420277,0.00012692974,0.00023893661,0.31031308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9166051,0.0123908,0.0042973207,0.0002591602,0.0016073529,0.00006947963,0.000042863914,0.00004366408,0.06468426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955752,0.00036328242,0.0008359417,0.0007080335,0.00095730455,0.0015602458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975782,0.00073765306,0.0003410741,0.00031345827,0.0005269941,0.0005026449],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011004132,0.0005128495,0.0005485766,0.00011594756,0.0052246447,0.00029012974,0.0006344606,0.0003837269,0.00043190233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007952477,0.00051098823,0.000313746,0.001525039,0.004744583,0.0013935273,0.00019061012,0.00042856226,0.0008136782],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045425873,0.00064431154,0.13816202,0.00021435673,0.0005318179,0.000049310467,0.28136384,0.00023033288,0.00062477565,0.4154461,0.0051889764,0.15749872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012268322,0.00027685982,0.3352961,0.00089403125,0.0003653679,0.00001412606,0.21586567,0.00019582963,0.0012438539,0.054091807,0.38862237,0.0019071642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016897537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07334433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3834334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008072536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014810517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098085400","doi":"","title":"Governor General Announces New Appointments to the Order of Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Governor; Order (exchange); Political science; Work (physics); Law; Executive order; Public administration; Business; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.024356282320318196,"score_gpt":0.29763821811582375,"score_spread":0.2732819357955055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098085400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43508652,0.00015579318,0.00013310759,0.1089494,0.0012533449,0.00053351675,0.000020344243,0.00003865983,0.45382932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7598362,0.000020963173,0.0020686602,0.003254834,0.0013563827,0.000009691179,9.547438e-7,0.0000045353636,0.23344776],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896044,0.00006275254,0.00011237518,0.00011504525,0.00049636,0.00025305635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994997,0.000054235217,0.00004439421,0.000086395026,0.0002047105,0.00011061235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022269024,0.000067295034,0.0000964906,0.0000043877053,0.0006347134,0.000028136239,0.0002645762,0.000023256978,0.0005059701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003343379,0.00003580335,0.0000223001,0.0002358344,0.00017500574,0.00006487612,0.00007398733,0.00003161293,0.000041199924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058415153,0.000008376734,0.0031462403,0.0000012335098,0.000035605302,2.9377503e-7,0.017711671,0.0000066247417,0.00007139084,0.006060021,0.9706561,0.0022966187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007217668,0.000028231347,0.011766393,0.0000030044582,0.000005459513,5.1470845e-8,0.009095106,0.000008517679,0.0002079294,0.0000932946,0.97864854,0.00007132136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9866342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3247497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002175043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005188551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55400175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100052892","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905040539","title":"Up the Creek: Fishing for a New Constitutional Order","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Joke; Politics; Order (exchange); Indigenous; Political science; Law; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Literature; Business","score_opus":0.0572730117395688,"score_gpt":0.34753217224735933,"score_spread":0.29025916050779055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100052892","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22841418,0.0007314821,0.006224093,0.7079419,0.003096145,0.00058723276,0.000051318304,0.000021670146,0.052931987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99205816,0.000003250761,0.0021822872,0.002401981,0.0016758529,0.0000016638955,1.4851699e-7,0.000001978262,0.0016746948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981238,0.000046364887,0.00022080225,0.000111152236,0.00050441234,0.000993435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969524,0.00034686722,0.00007724492,0.00006297063,0.0006767175,0.0018837586],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015258313,0.0000654628,0.00011462177,0.000053243126,0.0027558603,0.00043588894,0.0006692253,0.000043950913,0.00032309053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007952724,0.00004409527,0.00007904568,0.00035025884,0.0064446395,0.00057969225,0.00001870809,0.0001765138,0.000015467896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001271052,0.0000025721567,0.0011393148,7.873324e-7,0.0000052332603,0.000002090757,0.0031971657,0.000015759126,0.000013127588,0.9740321,0.019284114,0.0023064658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003021941,0.000035283534,0.03694748,0.000031531665,0.000023060333,0.000027753558,0.00763811,0.000092685535,0.000037797003,0.01469154,0.9400238,0.0001487957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28033113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.551571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011169738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01036411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100107939","doi":"10.1163/ej.9789004172326.i-395","title":"Religious Confession Privilege and the Common Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confession (law); Privilege (computing); Statute; Common law; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03346952398377098,"score_gpt":0.2995574239870164,"score_spread":0.26608790000324545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100107939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014659886,0.0032185535,0.0000013168863,0.0034724302,0.00038995518,0.0007162902,0.0000062271943,0.0001234675,0.9919252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040486913,0.005736682,0.00004831035,0.0011554162,0.00046625632,0.00003060575,0.000007691653,0.00001696835,0.95205116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986217,0.00024729368,0.00021992077,0.0002465414,0.00039315538,0.00027135896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899393,0.00045849706,0.00017114922,0.00018091092,0.000104101906,0.00009138815],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059055036,0.00021351666,0.0004202123,0.000011179232,0.0014649398,0.00009620636,0.00032948432,0.00036474015,0.00028717742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006344262,0.00010600139,0.000115065675,0.000027478067,0.0031270362,0.000082296865,0.0002563374,0.00037252644,0.00014149098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014485253,0.000005255977,0.000026154266,0.000012174269,0.00003756036,0.0000022008874,0.024112169,7.693397e-9,2.682074e-7,0.82754374,0.14756218,0.000683823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003550811,0.000011595522,0.000052359144,0.00007181628,0.000054875625,5.307665e-7,0.0017151351,4.8204294e-7,0.000002236643,0.064239256,0.93331534,0.00018128943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039012637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045230888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7857532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015579074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000091134454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103288000","doi":"10.21971/p77c7x","title":"Public Attitudes in Canada Toward Unmarried Mothers, 1950-1996","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Crossing boundaries","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shame; Stigma (botany); Social stigma; Psychology; Social psychology; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Psychiatry; Family medicine","score_opus":0.08800606726244363,"score_gpt":0.3115716632683954,"score_spread":0.22356559600595177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103288000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98456913,0.00126362,0.000018234834,0.008958811,0.00075122126,0.0001852196,0.000013770785,0.000102363236,0.004137636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99728787,0.00003254088,0.0004092885,0.00050964265,0.00019397143,0.00001611036,0.0000042079464,0.0000148122535,0.0015315571],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795955,0.00014129546,0.00027510728,0.00029394848,0.00061548006,0.0007146124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932075,0.00014350004,0.00009943195,0.00014174088,0.00015468974,0.00013987388],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032511097,0.00018403646,0.0002933904,0.00003868969,0.020803459,0.00710917,0.00032458713,0.00009014184,0.00016428596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008677249,0.00016383325,0.000059175425,0.00039542597,0.014945795,0.0005612831,0.0000912235,0.00021759313,0.000012027357],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012061359,0.00002643371,0.7744941,0.000019759535,0.000034643388,0.000046849615,0.21267675,0.000010117778,0.000033933244,0.0068707196,0.003997001,0.0017776083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023726014,0.000006613406,0.36922947,0.000022603304,0.0000041254807,0.0000018682612,0.00986285,0.0000056480253,0.000042397485,0.0002834177,0.6200709,0.0002328727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9929957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61607385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024091078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020523135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104120530","doi":"10.7202/1008873ar","title":"La question du « choix » dans la décision de se marier ou non au Québec","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Lien social et Politiques","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.034528447241686126,"score_gpt":0.37248136253242964,"score_spread":0.3379529152907435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104120530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70093024,0.0013364501,0.0002135587,0.044153824,0.0010295107,0.0003111964,0.00006511665,0.00018900925,0.25177106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97031367,0.0014955108,0.0007380575,0.0009930988,0.0060674297,0.000066918736,0.000017622257,0.000045809396,0.020261887],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99392474,0.0034053412,0.00040785188,0.00034103228,0.0005843928,0.0013366294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981139,0.0008362504,0.00023733784,0.0001351894,0.00022431064,0.000453045],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030073046,0.00038471087,0.00043970317,0.00004214548,0.0018517792,0.00022057773,0.00033141416,0.0008581986,0.00016997702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000977624,0.00036411613,0.00030393904,0.00028034183,0.0021060868,0.0012429991,0.00023827038,0.00062895723,0.00019024922],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001531086,0.00020905469,0.05262944,0.000044024036,0.000061044986,0.000006080838,0.5903659,0.0000012570708,0.000086488144,0.34498966,0.004400975,0.0071907775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028517487,0.00005082802,0.32157117,0.000115525036,0.00012037871,0.000007267723,0.10938869,0.000019894314,0.00013770266,0.0045336173,0.56329983,0.00046990465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9171045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36980852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55889887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004067448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009074087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104738641","doi":"10.1525/aa.2001.103.2.565","title":"The Pleasure of the Crown: Anthropology, Law and First Nations; Incorporating the Familiar: An Investigation into Legal Sensibilities in Nunavik","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Anthropologist","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Crown (dentistry); Law; Queen (butterfly); Sociology; Anthropology; History; Political science; Psychology; Ecology; Medicine","score_opus":0.026883150902088995,"score_gpt":0.3316637072623046,"score_spread":0.3047805563602156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104738641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86023027,0.0007892867,0.000008439995,0.1337528,0.00031073505,0.0004581541,0.000007665442,0.000050043654,0.004392589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963605,0.0025924395,0.00016361299,0.00057614245,0.00012122682,0.00002748437,0.0000022615952,0.000008315936,0.00014804062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977395,0.0009780595,0.0003488281,0.0002703936,0.00033996865,0.0003232591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786246,0.0012441635,0.00036118334,0.0002906047,0.00018483016,0.000056782024],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010063861,0.00015807262,0.00023672594,0.000025809853,0.0069321287,0.000117741896,0.00041857007,0.00007222943,0.000013127493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016894252,0.00007811215,0.000057942118,0.0007637327,0.18828511,0.00027720554,0.00017145905,0.0002769313,0.0000018458414],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003104901,0.00006077004,0.29142407,0.000012596097,0.00003499047,0.0000035748124,0.081209995,0.00006534022,0.00007038325,0.62238455,0.0004747215,0.0042279493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014383106,0.00012588582,0.074746065,0.000025549292,0.000015545482,0.0000041199974,0.90883046,0.00011738332,0.00013148453,0.003536541,0.01216745,0.00015570641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9245435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9764321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82762045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023090423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013613891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104824880","doi":"","title":"A History of Preferential Share in Ontario: Intestacy Legislation and Conceptions of the Deserving or Undeserving Widow","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estate; Legislation; Wife; Settlor; Spouse; Law; Law reform; Political science; Annulment; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04985179999804352,"score_gpt":0.2835424754451565,"score_spread":0.23369067544711297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104824880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98010784,0.0002686943,0.000026333284,0.00040409094,0.00028125982,0.0002832802,0.000004403959,0.000020349153,0.01860373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99566203,0.000017152184,0.00033441102,0.000058234313,0.000057523583,0.000015755879,0.0000024433248,0.0000054892025,0.0038469825],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893457,0.00023548589,0.00024415294,0.00015349449,0.00026167807,0.00017059334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992999,0.0002006395,0.00016944595,0.00014739808,0.00012835297,0.00005425559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036561012,0.00008769867,0.000185213,0.000020562064,0.00021941781,0.00002346573,0.00025317303,0.000073766794,0.0005908517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075645244,0.00006107635,0.000051850373,0.00011634302,0.00042431345,0.00034752398,0.00017237056,0.0001987755,0.0000032514426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084802195,0.00015225688,0.6956615,0.00016356495,0.000072330506,0.0000011207864,0.20761923,0.000116048235,0.00375117,0.08878803,0.0020196564,0.0015703071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096932246,0.00008079783,0.8977484,0.0006263095,0.000051392617,8.474385e-7,0.012330327,0.00016633078,0.00013539812,0.0032717085,0.084347464,0.00027171106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5375738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9549866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41741273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079292635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002154304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6469412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105618512","doi":"10.7202/038177ar","title":"The Constitution’s Peoples: Approaching Community in the Context of Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Treaty; Jurisprudence; Law; Declaration; Context (archaeology); Cornerstone; Political science; Doctrine; Section (typography); Negotiation; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.04724023654900858,"score_gpt":0.3060059065138428,"score_spread":0.2587656699648342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105618512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5883057,0.00053325883,0.000056095254,0.010682181,0.0010568404,0.00068078615,0.000031989515,0.000022545597,0.39863056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993213,0.00027891604,0.000030294863,0.00021875651,0.00012357834,0.0000039502015,7.547991e-7,0.0000013584715,0.000021134018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970859,0.0017841681,0.0003706437,0.000064270345,0.00047972126,0.0002152596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854946,0.0007000709,0.00037277775,0.00015668594,0.00018617712,0.00003482306],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031152582,0.00009552396,0.00017384026,0.000016725517,0.015261163,0.00007303442,0.0005329515,0.00007438145,0.000007150851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008702064,0.000043515793,0.00013876248,0.0002396368,0.001954771,0.00025625856,0.000045813656,0.0008128747,9.4004497e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028742214,0.00012435814,0.0021888302,0.000007626333,0.00003483997,7.9139926e-7,0.04372867,0.00016299341,0.00020772408,0.9498731,0.00018429094,0.0034580529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013133391,0.00015828066,0.059544828,0.00033719616,0.000101797246,0.000089252426,0.5729109,0.000056131375,0.0009501385,0.0044270973,0.3598538,0.00025723292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0454494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27035582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.945446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026479992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053452055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98602086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105643594","doi":"10.7202/042191ar","title":"La « civilizatio » du droit canonique: une problématique du droit québécois","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Appeal; Conscience; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Civil code; Opposition (politics); State (computer science); Phenomenon; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.007816597737783879,"score_gpt":0.24546495488664077,"score_spread":0.2376483571488569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105643594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83723015,0.00040917547,0.0021198876,0.012786774,0.00017932507,0.0008218444,0.000021962263,0.00053098815,0.14589989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97813165,0.0010360951,0.001563007,0.0012686873,0.0008224309,0.00015839077,0.000018005216,0.00004978338,0.016951952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972527,0.00038531597,0.00043324294,0.00047756525,0.00061439525,0.00083680486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854547,0.00041274447,0.0002202991,0.00025916327,0.0002223828,0.00033992968],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010002382,0.0003161787,0.00043083724,0.000081999744,0.0015030823,0.00019645653,0.0005819634,0.0005874996,0.00030020383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009092632,0.00032334353,0.00021322943,0.00063341786,0.0013771962,0.00043805962,0.000083406936,0.00062326185,0.00012334461],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038254868,0.00024339675,0.020898718,0.00010886266,0.00024372237,0.00008357843,0.38295746,0.0004757005,0.00053853967,0.55604285,0.011310152,0.027058803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014093019,0.000109840614,0.056437764,0.00019859041,0.00018696094,0.000042921747,0.050313164,0.0008721038,0.00086396845,0.03590761,0.852078,0.001579771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13100624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42502886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84076786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041101337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003901067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106265496","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x11000068","title":"Judicial Restraint and Neutral Principles in Anglican Church Property Disputes: <i>Bentley v Diocese of New Westminster</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Synod; Statutory law; Political science; Theology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08927004415386,"score_gpt":0.30501881551784576,"score_spread":0.21574877136398576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106265496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93851453,0.0002957788,0.00009442172,0.0023534414,0.00025776,0.00030289716,0.0000069452285,0.000031433003,0.058142807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99691904,0.00017798861,0.0019361333,0.0001345454,0.00059995445,0.0000043006607,5.832613e-7,0.000012292201,0.00021516196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979843,0.00023771657,0.0005215192,0.00024172534,0.00045720808,0.0005575364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897677,0.00014664828,0.00016043463,0.00009333662,0.000110409805,0.00051239115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068453635,0.00017844007,0.00036318513,0.000044437944,0.0005968249,0.00008781142,0.000307903,0.00012811848,0.00017085293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005502304,0.00011201877,0.000096275464,0.00019393723,0.0013417532,0.0003264436,0.00012528662,0.00046547755,0.0000067341343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005767623,0.0009457007,0.09829318,0.00008400558,0.00016595167,0.00036718725,0.18240894,0.00002542317,0.0009212154,0.6818037,0.0010723843,0.033335544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022886836,0.00080656004,0.93713343,0.0005172228,0.00011293458,0.00007975361,0.021981418,0.000094054776,0.0005854672,0.01182605,0.023881339,0.0006930816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025139147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030138882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83884025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012816301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016056214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98755854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106498539","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2002.tb01071.x","title":"Recognizing same‐sex relationships: The evolution of recent federal and provincial policies","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Jurisdiction; Constitution; Humanities; Law; Art","score_opus":0.09844343157174186,"score_gpt":0.3018348072751161,"score_spread":0.20339137570337423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106498539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5791594,0.0008223278,0.000041301824,0.33720344,0.00031212307,0.0007831977,0.00004551301,0.00006311437,0.08156959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99764836,0.00017921861,0.00008291796,0.00015992923,0.00026785414,0.000022702288,0.000009533289,0.0000048365296,0.0016246325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989266,0.00021065975,0.00020441467,0.00014109172,0.0002279288,0.0002893414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999237,0.0001273274,0.00011416262,0.00008160155,0.00020942462,0.0002304989],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005256554,0.000080409074,0.00009311478,0.000065465414,0.0023384613,0.00020343061,0.00011163425,0.000108179134,0.00023224241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018499059,0.00006545279,0.000027057933,0.00030989296,0.0004032524,0.00037921977,0.000012328254,0.00014673846,0.000009169087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008651839,0.00006303553,0.14252129,0.000026160369,0.000067928406,0.00000307818,0.073034935,8.613043e-7,0.0000690712,0.6881876,0.026529992,0.06948737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029318084,0.00011599934,0.1191062,0.000021495855,0.000030490217,0.0000058400524,0.12928355,0.00021451506,0.000033058084,0.0030899348,0.74746865,0.0003370958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10814561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93732554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82917994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007820131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007115247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107686027","doi":"","title":"Roman Catholic schooling in Ontario: Past struggles, present challenges, future direction?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Faith; Diversity (politics); Colonialism; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; History; Law; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.06547199566284374,"score_gpt":0.28968578201175654,"score_spread":0.2242137863489128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107686027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6717174,0.0029633762,0.000001397871,0.0031955903,0.0007109649,0.00038737257,0.0000014013536,0.00015363515,0.32086882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898854,0.0012739251,0.00069953676,0.000045650795,0.00083137857,0.000051819414,0.0000022599165,0.000009565571,0.0072004544],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985402,0.00015542362,0.00020965884,0.00030672713,0.00034538558,0.00044255808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954087,0.000034376084,0.00006313758,0.00014192497,0.00007893219,0.00014077348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034133135,0.00015380216,0.00020222324,0.00004947339,0.000586628,0.00004830285,0.00023160991,0.00014450525,0.0008851702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004132973,0.000120830686,0.000071755254,0.00016111456,0.00013254302,0.000321291,0.000091817616,0.0003161348,0.000074887976],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020250141,0.0002273162,0.20807384,0.000015036932,0.000061485975,0.00001864139,0.75283015,0.0000036960014,0.000018135637,0.023534596,0.002545463,0.012651399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014362132,0.000016063303,0.63903475,0.000013508875,0.0000068847125,5.028144e-7,0.053351447,0.0000012615018,0.0000114151335,0.00027402813,0.30699342,0.00015308829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88127583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9852664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6994787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007280993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000918393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9691993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108565497","doi":"","title":"Constitutional jurisdiction over health in Canada.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Public administration; Health care; Criminal jurisdiction; Political science; Health law; Federal jurisdiction; Government (linguistics); Law; Health policy; Parliament; Public health; Business; International health; Medicine; Politics; Nursing","score_opus":0.024821388640788977,"score_gpt":0.2699187314856157,"score_spread":0.2450973428448267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108565497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7186762,0.00097148184,0.000003677598,0.067991935,0.00079812243,0.0011717791,0.000041153544,0.0000754895,0.21027014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99594784,0.00031146995,0.000013461751,0.0010854534,0.00014858179,0.00019813344,0.000003339131,0.0000012313154,0.0022904766],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906856,0.00008687548,0.00012620458,0.00010976757,0.0002548916,0.000353704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997619,0.000039703395,0.000028146591,0.00003420432,0.000018662937,0.000117378324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028539402,0.00004932881,0.00009369007,0.000008718691,0.00039518444,0.00001734096,0.00006522459,0.000024380106,0.00042381202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061649785,0.000043966127,0.000017086535,0.00015881874,0.00023750798,0.00011093794,0.000007268031,0.00007668463,0.000011263237],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021073814,0.000052249186,0.13461986,0.0000073807396,0.000026686861,0.000006204663,0.0068846243,0.0001490584,2.0708819e-7,0.032596007,0.06849927,0.75713736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009546228,5.0518713e-7,0.55333847,0.000001490978,6.813228e-7,1.1336316e-7,0.0003454794,0.0000023477503,3.621516e-7,0.000058532907,0.44612083,0.00003571586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9873342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75710166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023776263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006636907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.621741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108607654","doi":"","title":"Collaborative Divorce: hoe een teambenadering in conflictoplossingsprocessen tot een succes maken?","year":2012,"lang":"nl","type":"article","venue":"Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Art; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016171178326272653,"score_gpt":0.2552923874324379,"score_spread":0.23912120910616522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108607654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8374835,0.0023371826,0.000028943568,0.0012094466,0.00095362787,0.0011790501,0.0002943316,0.0001971251,0.15631679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94688624,0.0010397916,0.00008893951,0.00009876406,0.00054296874,0.0000017604189,0.000053079828,0.000061125014,0.051227357],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932131,0.0006884133,0.0011793359,0.0012704408,0.0016470938,0.0020015708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954106,0.00065161823,0.0015943148,0.0005540759,0.0008070706,0.0009823072],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065792364,0.0010786371,0.001593233,0.0007422406,0.002080593,0.00038743153,0.0020819276,0.0012968319,0.000114562354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024254079,0.0012098626,0.0005336038,0.0026034452,0.0033629658,0.008809587,0.0016592158,0.0016673853,0.00014472863],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013897367,0.0010114897,0.61717767,0.00080102775,0.0013912879,0.00054294313,0.364257,0.00020806049,0.0040404955,0.0032021569,0.0034838116,0.0024943417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046988707,0.00044908148,0.14121851,0.002006048,0.000788268,0.000045616165,0.5546401,0.00010639549,0.0028714146,0.000051074145,0.29031923,0.002805392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004793872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043445715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47595912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026197038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005020528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108985472","doi":"","title":"Report on the Parental Support Obligation in Section 90 of the Family Relations Act","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Section (typography); Repeal; Child support; Law; Family law; Political science; Payment; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.01982288637567921,"score_gpt":0.3058068331672106,"score_spread":0.2859839467915314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108985472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97423583,0.00014563702,0.000082516,0.0057491763,0.00047026572,0.00022338166,6.320264e-7,0.000012371831,0.019080207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99682516,0.0003483249,0.0000066650146,0.00006996229,0.0003229136,0.0000036781835,0.0000012841978,0.0000048041143,0.0024172238],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805105,0.00018736631,0.00033643912,0.000103249586,0.0005225666,0.0007993025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929315,0.00017130669,0.0003079289,0.00009256082,0.00010515855,0.000029898416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050350917,0.00007547434,0.0000925388,0.000040661824,0.0010348931,0.000028298153,0.00019399278,0.00007550305,0.00003257225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005651553,0.00004143719,0.000108982174,0.00040560303,0.000171384,0.00016697485,0.000021991053,0.001123556,0.0000062143054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077800345,0.00017899122,0.7030546,0.0000024064657,0.00016007657,0.000009336803,0.02813654,0.0001693872,0.0017067443,0.25500372,0.0018876011,0.009612779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025194022,0.00010333553,0.8984484,0.000025480109,0.00002322203,0.00005131385,0.061958697,0.0000062418276,0.00022687107,0.029543778,0.00925647,0.00010424202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036587543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053331546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22545993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019934275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008619529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9639427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109720334","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebt017","title":"Family Law Reform in (Neoliberal) Context: British Columbia's New Family Law Act","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Family law; Law; Context (archaeology); Law reform; Political science; Best interests; Guardian; Relocation; Dispute resolution; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.024046559922244557,"score_gpt":0.3120802885177703,"score_spread":0.28803372859552573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109720334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49615642,0.0015333631,0.000017059578,0.016829822,0.0010528014,0.00021927261,0.000026163034,0.000025944237,0.48413914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96746546,0.0012442128,0.00011988527,0.025629798,0.0022586607,0.0000049459863,0.0000021205167,0.000014261503,0.0032606414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975198,0.0003523532,0.00064190215,0.00018185996,0.00091889396,0.00038520273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835694,0.00048058905,0.00040236433,0.00010434044,0.00044204624,0.00021374262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001325013,0.00015374915,0.00042693663,0.000043878772,0.0006436352,0.00091714755,0.0008153912,0.00013225815,0.000021984559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003035434,0.00013527843,0.00022417332,0.00013402486,0.001537393,0.0006971389,0.00015498501,0.0004168794,0.000014146949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014340402,0.00005158843,0.0004233012,0.000003931031,0.00018505711,0.000030564446,0.010300617,0.000007536943,0.00008935587,0.97669584,0.0027089843,0.009359821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004647484,0.000096944204,0.032896303,0.00023899412,0.000035049692,0.00005085079,0.0047103735,0.00001976842,0.000010286219,0.12009349,0.8369377,0.00026270983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9435747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64807445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8566024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060765096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018305996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8844075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110783394","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2006.00070.x","title":"THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA UPHOLDING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF SECTION 43 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA: WHAT THIS DECISION MEANS TO THE CHILD WELFARE SECTOR*","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Section (typography); Law; Criminal code; Code (set theory); Welfare; Political science; Sociology; Criminal law; Computer science; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.03114747434942486,"score_gpt":0.2859998624272431,"score_spread":0.2548523880778183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110783394","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7435867,0.14742355,0.00010873535,0.09054546,0.004029768,0.004103516,0.00070763857,0.000013484747,0.009481095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846679,0.014575441,0.00004003783,0.0005047938,0.000101811784,0.00002042365,0.0000020338168,0.0000066931652,0.00008088404],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955743,0.0007415204,0.0009734601,0.00021438424,0.0021980368,0.00029831196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956463,0.0015138858,0.0009046369,0.00060306006,0.0012810824,0.000051015802],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030707559,0.00019457827,0.00055171864,0.000012575889,0.0021947515,0.000025119403,0.001228176,0.00007250675,0.000056952824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024504012,0.00007439059,0.00027120303,0.0007443865,0.0010163647,0.00011400402,0.00024845905,0.00026409322,2.255207e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031889032,0.0003897145,0.049427412,0.0034198225,0.0009221715,0.0000030415551,0.021114029,0.008166668,0.0019336521,0.09734438,0.7781659,0.038794342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021392846,0.000028722614,0.3860305,0.006049604,0.00033600314,0.0000031047089,0.013884745,0.000039962964,0.0007259439,0.00018496519,0.59233016,0.00017233638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96438766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99532145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33660308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063013023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015959697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110806561","doi":"10.7202/037458ar","title":"Le couple et la contractualisation de la rupture","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010337211397078513,"score_gpt":0.2876317003170923,"score_spread":0.2772944889200138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110806561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8057548,0.0049471026,0.0013211581,0.041561328,0.00031380987,0.00028387178,0.00003297895,0.00013907017,0.1456459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96987945,0.0013837079,0.0011766921,0.0046563433,0.00040177326,0.000011491467,0.000014222666,0.000014292206,0.022462014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977972,0.0008786252,0.00020525587,0.00024414473,0.0003218155,0.00055297697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986039,0.0009107997,0.00013368975,0.00010996077,0.00007908028,0.00016259549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013788751,0.0001940503,0.00026063883,0.000024177985,0.00086984714,0.00020827036,0.00022886331,0.0007707455,0.00010046891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000769096,0.00020354253,0.00015669255,0.00023066344,0.0016345901,0.00032758276,0.000016671012,0.0007692058,0.00004389426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017856799,0.00013643852,0.0009857666,0.000018232551,0.00006682414,0.000036099205,0.14150512,0.00019422238,0.0007414237,0.8244539,0.0072793183,0.024564797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078297826,0.000077514436,0.09641152,0.00007862993,0.00011043308,0.000021743046,0.03059549,0.00031519885,0.00022302178,0.06930392,0.80163354,0.0004460003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009693882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016872628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7943542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011608026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021962574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111170202","doi":"10.7202/039650ar","title":"Health Care and Human Rights after Auton and Chaoulli","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Charter; Law; Legislation; Political science; Supreme court; Legislature; Health care; Interpretation (philosophy); Human rights; Economics","score_opus":0.016849430216867467,"score_gpt":0.32019714360296353,"score_spread":0.30334771338609606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111170202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92177844,0.0012062353,6.734985e-7,0.006501184,0.00055309373,0.0001734645,0.000017907334,0.000043610788,0.06972538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986673,0.00009960996,0.00038095666,0.00023146368,0.00044737814,0.0000041743365,6.321819e-7,0.000005546346,0.00016295283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990453,0.00010007676,0.00015651959,0.00014086242,0.00025114242,0.00030607937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994545,0.00002867504,0.000088318564,0.00005199201,0.000097663135,0.0002788238],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032203193,0.000099794815,0.00016627026,0.000016782864,0.012788369,0.00013304755,0.00008097069,0.00007946703,0.00010323992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017098137,0.00006936415,0.00003841764,0.00004054435,0.00045536246,0.00022121787,0.00005079253,0.0003935644,0.000005831872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031976466,0.00007594252,0.019068033,0.000072471616,0.00010671222,0.00007214762,0.09619809,4.1001002e-7,0.00025585125,0.86018634,0.0014412283,0.022490801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002461134,0.00006544205,0.035726707,0.000021205595,0.000008909811,0.00001898867,0.0021386137,3.7858098e-7,0.000029130073,0.0008145556,0.96081173,0.00011820609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035074983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5597618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009451936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000057981774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98849684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111689120","doi":"10.7202/043863ar","title":"Note lexicographique : cy-près","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Philosophy; Doctrine; Political science; Law; Theology","score_opus":0.01767417176578603,"score_gpt":0.2811222884187279,"score_spread":0.2634481166529419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111689120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73680735,0.02520357,0.0040661637,0.12397494,0.0020124495,0.00073291163,0.00006491767,0.00038266272,0.10675504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83847684,0.005657549,0.010562722,0.0034476372,0.002721911,0.000046965884,0.000008321777,0.000041575615,0.13903645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971507,0.00034404628,0.00036793321,0.0004666466,0.00052742695,0.001143252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871486,0.00032645537,0.0001759596,0.00024503452,0.00013696877,0.00040071053],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067469804,0.00034130397,0.00040072465,0.00007115302,0.0012375572,0.00014442788,0.0005363411,0.0008479702,0.00075477886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043161324,0.0003534299,0.00040364315,0.0007064547,0.0035654178,0.00046470272,0.00008790377,0.0009844172,0.0007308284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034232486,0.00022202343,0.0042131906,0.00009213507,0.00027853408,0.000053648593,0.20816743,0.0003273843,0.00032076455,0.4298286,0.018809952,0.3376521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042642324,0.000057562716,0.009979854,0.00008408795,0.0001306838,0.000008174614,0.0075367196,0.00025769105,0.00022082037,0.014815572,0.9659161,0.0005663331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012610866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015665993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9471061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003381416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009620364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112600016","doi":"","title":"Child Support and Shared Parenting in Canada: A \"Reality Cheque\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child support; Family law; Publishing; Law; Family court; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Set (abstract data type); Section (typography); Cheque; Law reform; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.04553248621422363,"score_gpt":0.3132534242809266,"score_spread":0.267720938066703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112600016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95961976,0.005309822,0.0000011720355,0.025155762,0.00050685136,0.00029345317,0.000011564772,0.000015962065,0.009085626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973894,0.0015195337,0.00011847059,0.00038277588,0.00029251268,0.000012481484,6.542706e-7,0.000008701352,0.00027550344],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978414,0.00018855237,0.00065945525,0.00017168447,0.0006630878,0.00047580848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985985,0.00019040312,0.00044364808,0.00006999991,0.0005214499,0.00017598578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087474997,0.00018216108,0.0005765404,0.00005521513,0.0007483228,0.00012409742,0.0002316519,0.00005011605,0.000076228294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011154722,0.00013345518,0.00008261297,0.00023435331,0.00030441777,0.0007178012,0.00017210904,0.00036549175,0.000004234071],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048231595,0.00016841061,0.7423228,0.00016583453,0.0011278307,0.000380035,0.15600875,0.000052576226,0.000093385024,0.0031422393,0.081010334,0.015479577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064759096,0.00006156654,0.83389026,0.000161461,0.000053549877,0.000022914512,0.10884446,0.0000066040516,0.000020344487,0.00026860734,0.055747177,0.0002754813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9389769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9744873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09156745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009499645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005310024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.575557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115739919","doi":"10.1177/a017399","title":"Examining the Foreseeable: Assisted Suicide as a Herald of Changing Moralities","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.1923875970825527,"score_gpt":0.40439704295322354,"score_spread":0.21200944587067083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115739919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8935072,0.008053594,0.0000059705044,0.022316016,0.00051630085,0.0005489874,0.0000094163215,0.00018906136,0.07485344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98196524,0.001375923,0.000060145398,0.00048528385,0.0011545862,0.00011353447,0.0000025118668,0.000020012667,0.014822776],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711937,0.00043258994,0.00041606466,0.00029225423,0.0008717925,0.00086795614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983719,0.00065784884,0.00027620036,0.00012933608,0.0004972481,0.000067456975],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001249878,0.00026225802,0.00057768216,0.00006549324,0.005243645,0.00013730761,0.0004116223,0.00012452804,0.00009448122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015004841,0.000179033,0.00020814924,0.000936536,0.0016956914,0.00040418748,0.00032267874,0.00026540048,0.000021823978],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009942145,0.00010378704,0.027112586,0.00008423844,0.0013679937,0.000043890035,0.758455,0.0000133772955,0.00028254496,0.18477269,0.01325368,0.014410794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042241625,0.00008286948,0.036963433,0.000092408045,0.00012414483,0.0000024229978,0.7895463,0.0000040038653,0.00011136326,0.0025320258,0.16976663,0.00035199936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034529246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021283325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18224065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003741161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000098990946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117194350","doi":"10.1017/s1326011100004154","title":"Special Schooling for Indigenous Students: a New Form of Racial Discrimination?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Mainstream; Racism; Ethos; Conformity; Sociology; Special education; Indigenous education; Gender studies; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.033979342305497734,"score_gpt":0.370491552743335,"score_spread":0.3365122104378373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117194350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99338365,0.00032560754,0.0001087182,0.0024286055,0.002031373,0.0008629976,0.000010245628,0.000009068098,0.00083971675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777388,0.00009168955,0.0011356837,0.000040496456,0.01625698,0.000012330783,0.000008775057,0.000012211491,0.0047030044],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980706,0.00011688487,0.0006430933,0.00010353136,0.0006954011,0.00037049138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979928,0.00012370777,0.00094440964,0.000102343234,0.00072484213,0.000111892245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011227312,0.00013313173,0.00025849545,0.000111364454,0.0012828836,0.00015090233,0.0006205295,0.0000912498,0.00006510348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027792883,0.00009388541,0.00019254336,0.0002638999,0.00018787474,0.0004244933,0.000021614775,0.00019503535,0.000006976251],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016499603,0.0006410896,0.028236067,0.0000430928,0.000153182,0.0000012854847,0.9194682,0.00008198633,0.00036476195,0.0022408082,0.018604523,0.029999986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001761797,0.0008710984,0.47043094,0.00029624486,0.0005178939,0.000028549226,0.3543191,3.338815e-7,0.0022917793,0.033209067,0.13574854,0.00052469096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01216916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062622298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5651491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060316257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015718559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118147250","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2003.tb00882.x","title":"THE EVOLUTION OF MODERN CANADIAN FAMILY LAW PROCEDURE","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Family law; Law; Equity (law); Government (linguistics); Political science; Common law; Substantive law; Civil procedure; Civil law (Civil law); Public law","score_opus":0.033959379861419545,"score_gpt":0.3046778811358444,"score_spread":0.2707185012744248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118147250","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002928757,0.6852533,0.000017124401,0.007911132,0.000325616,0.0010267907,0.000013252355,0.000038569797,0.3024854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82991093,0.16482289,0.00011629261,0.0031151196,0.00008635484,0.00008064697,0.000002116267,0.0000112342195,0.0018543894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998302,0.00034205313,0.00029298296,0.00018338964,0.00045283645,0.0004267693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990514,0.00011692633,0.00012940406,0.00019009926,0.0003390087,0.00017314476],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011867192,0.00013207988,0.00028295376,0.000013231172,0.0014126014,0.00003858717,0.000303849,0.000086790584,0.000017186963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070340955,0.00008362892,0.00012661821,0.00032278657,0.00041235954,0.00012378447,0.000018129147,0.00015342918,0.00006634671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034826076,0.000046161036,0.0018692162,0.0010415674,0.00012950765,0.0000040637815,0.0066112047,0.00000940659,0.000168994,0.78222567,0.18496037,0.022930397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005829875,0.000010665313,0.0048306207,0.0006675114,0.000048340353,3.3051217e-7,0.0029809831,0.000005512736,0.0000017615693,0.002033374,0.9892348,0.00012780305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33086115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47954857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8269822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007740943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007290501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120290104","doi":"10.7202/1006437ar","title":"The Absentee Minister of Education of Canada: The Canadian federal government’s constitutional role in First Nations education","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l éducation de McGill","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada; Human Resources and Skills Development Canada; Center for Makroøkologi, Evolution og Klima; Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada; Australian Government","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Constitution; Political science; Public administration; Constitutional right; Law; Responsible government; Politics","score_opus":0.19673285836285914,"score_gpt":0.36614343438633196,"score_spread":0.16941057602347281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120290104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5076291,0.0016274201,0.000022934997,0.030542973,0.0066921203,0.00086374267,0.00009892738,0.00000863052,0.45251414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99533635,0.0003163438,0.0015774067,0.0005867979,0.00018227776,0.000051871306,0.0000028230093,0.00000530289,0.0019408511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775237,0.00034752465,0.00069771876,0.0001628388,0.00068015815,0.00035938315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689925,0.0005249545,0.00091267715,0.00015348065,0.0012903571,0.00021925903],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021668507,0.00012674046,0.00017472744,0.00016792427,0.005537027,0.000067638946,0.00067119655,0.000075134936,0.000093420196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029704163,0.0000927305,0.00009045258,0.00081379525,0.0020399871,0.00047035655,0.000027534768,0.00018015277,0.0000016896207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036195463,0.00093432696,0.06375355,0.000094434006,0.00006597092,5.5210074e-7,0.06653574,0.0003403628,0.00009500809,0.84143895,0.016756242,0.009948682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017177622,0.000088320776,0.3081195,0.0004077157,0.000054560907,0.000069974434,0.25509894,0.000052040836,0.00055668614,0.011271529,0.423866,0.00024294258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78680533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8301674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072397674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020632364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99657124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120311700","doi":"10.1017/s0008423901777839","title":"Culture and the Courts: A New Direction in Canadian Jurisprudence on Aboriginal Rights?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Sociology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01388306806477177,"score_gpt":0.32607648368923253,"score_spread":0.3121934156244608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120311700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82238907,0.0006812098,0.000009506454,0.0857774,0.0009530451,0.00026084692,0.000006890259,0.000008013802,0.08991402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970002,0.0000885466,0.00007982818,0.0011389497,0.00050164276,0.0000014809353,8.149704e-8,0.0000025377387,0.0011866881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976161,0.0001411868,0.0002290362,0.0001692353,0.00053984026,0.0013045601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99569494,0.00016040856,0.000073563795,0.000078878315,0.00025547383,0.003736723],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018089272,0.00010578214,0.00018013603,0.0002103277,0.0017582311,0.00031509603,0.00049221213,0.00007399111,0.00010129692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016029242,0.000062175335,0.000048841055,0.0006532432,0.0034293388,0.00044922545,0.0000075283124,0.00036774762,0.000012773166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008732468,0.0000036827385,0.013405932,7.363142e-7,0.0000033961596,0.000087374654,0.008353617,0.000004436433,0.000004480873,0.97622615,0.0013565673,0.0005449115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005333391,0.00006440003,0.42089698,0.00008200595,0.000014431158,0.0000688747,0.0034928473,0.000028490316,0.0000121375415,0.020416642,0.55422866,0.00016120379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.995383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99701446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9558095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026979595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008655417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122551926","doi":"10.1017/s000842390504059x","title":"In Search of a Postcolonial Theory of Normative Integration: Reflections on A.C. Cairns' Theory of<i>Citizens Plus</i>","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Normative; Politics; Economic Justice; Sociology; State (computer science); Political science; Context (archaeology); Praxis; Charter; Scholarship; Law; Environmental ethics; History","score_opus":0.05076296494224133,"score_gpt":0.3731014638038629,"score_spread":0.3223384988616216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122551926","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94902104,0.00007232574,0.0001357775,0.010095503,0.00028633987,0.00018528447,0.000042956843,0.0000023999119,0.0401584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99879676,0.000007449898,0.00040984814,0.00036763237,0.00015575843,0.0000012362252,1.6128709e-7,0.0000030109125,0.00025813203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976855,0.00044857457,0.0004877378,0.00011375438,0.00064238283,0.00062203256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749273,0.0007681665,0.00018861027,0.00009080332,0.0008559529,0.0006037182],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032463898,0.000085505315,0.00028513407,0.00031821735,0.0003415253,0.00002634335,0.0004737702,0.000068670495,0.00021345509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00349621,0.00006456615,0.000102859965,0.0008073425,0.0041576982,0.00042508295,0.000025066689,0.00030228845,0.000006269278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003175155,0.000023492074,0.00056048896,0.0000063212,0.000009121831,0.0000042613638,0.049623106,0.00008700876,0.0009613198,0.9481246,0.00007374387,0.0004948007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022197452,0.002114384,0.4078033,0.0010452026,0.00010759595,0.000053655513,0.3831346,0.00015829207,0.052396327,0.14630532,0.0039650537,0.00069653447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.068329364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1623675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80181926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016444563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004120802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99855244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W212323270","doi":"","title":"More is needed to change the rules of succession for Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological succession; Constitution; Throne; Statute; Process (computing); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Biology; Ecology; Politics; Programming language","score_opus":0.05920927376977555,"score_gpt":0.32305590879065993,"score_spread":0.2638466350208844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W212323270","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09232405,0.12098107,8.6817545e-7,0.77804196,0.00046226504,0.0058228215,0.00041483535,0.000013508324,0.0019386229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42152098,0.07412386,0.00054904085,0.49655533,0.0008568703,0.0035760957,0.00010055439,0.000038279766,0.0026789848],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988916,0.00007761885,0.00022117022,0.00015695154,0.00025380834,0.00039883427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990823,0.00008733441,0.000083882296,0.00016043101,0.00015781175,0.00042819107],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022589411,0.00011723363,0.00026385655,0.000018170733,0.0006132944,0.000028339291,0.00036483674,0.000031303553,0.0012597318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000127781,0.00007413131,0.00007808347,0.00017543853,0.00011330722,0.00013759476,0.000028755449,0.000054330045,0.000035456047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.4239547e-7,0.0000026697624,0.0012125198,0.00026006516,0.000024721836,5.6566864e-7,0.005584209,6.356936e-8,0.000002525406,0.000115127346,0.9459559,0.046841092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004902256,0.000010690113,0.00485087,0.0006835674,0.00003550846,1.3141263e-7,0.011017563,0.0000015167022,0.000015704216,0.00003050074,0.98319095,0.00011394504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99977124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99944025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32919693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007383951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054532895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123309974","doi":"10.24124/c677/2011230","title":"The Misrecognised as the Least the Advantaged Citizens in Plural Democracies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Political Science Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Identity (music); Sociology; Democracy; Harm; Economic Justice; Politics; Primary goods; Agency (philosophy); Social identity theory; Identity politics; Law and economics; Political science; Political economy; Social group; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.0386953619034774,"score_gpt":0.36166314992583054,"score_spread":0.32296778802235315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123309974","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032628115,0.071478955,7.396371e-7,0.7217357,0.00080035726,0.0016924829,0.000018260807,0.000037453385,0.17160794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9702651,0.010918052,0.000012776425,0.016942818,0.00034155682,0.00009123114,6.1326864e-7,0.000006142489,0.0014217048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949753,0.00062057935,0.00030508338,0.0002265437,0.0007533332,0.0031191206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99668074,0.0011480398,0.00006492127,0.00030428031,0.00016957629,0.0016324436],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006408582,0.00016146246,0.0002258386,0.00003009957,0.006544715,0.0002897667,0.0013671999,0.00005096571,0.0002576607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01149047,0.0000670683,0.00012287035,0.0011553374,0.006949614,0.00037774688,0.00010520519,0.0003664957,0.00041087205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010858352,0.000009731467,0.0054831337,0.000041173913,0.000008585294,0.0000037082607,0.006319551,1.0950821e-7,0.000008865629,0.9630673,0.0051517445,0.019905018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006600723,0.000008786709,0.057990596,0.00029157434,0.000033312892,0.000009517334,0.016735293,0.000004296596,0.000009923537,0.004343331,0.92030054,0.00020682364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2834062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4660537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95872396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015925978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015694147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124223897","doi":"10.1017/s0008423909990655","title":"“Culture and the Courts” Revisited: Group-Rights Scholarship and the Evolution of s.35(1)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Sociology; Ethnology; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015397234621218829,"score_gpt":0.2902289149570453,"score_spread":0.27483168033582644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124223897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8980681,0.007575474,0.000044005108,0.07887766,0.00023364242,0.00034663742,0.000008553116,0.0000059940185,0.0148399975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987522,0.00007044471,0.00013370549,0.0006998903,0.0002215877,6.090488e-7,5.764359e-8,0.0000012257965,0.00012027363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981649,0.0003221626,0.00026092867,0.00011969896,0.00054918666,0.0005831546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981766,0.00030303348,0.00014492768,0.00008776712,0.00041016832,0.00087751215],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040327315,0.00008263701,0.00022020045,0.000059850154,0.0021084994,0.00025269965,0.00047821563,0.00005847305,0.000014889255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035956264,0.00003614123,0.00006576352,0.00033474743,0.010930935,0.00046915578,0.000021661495,0.00029519753,0.000001006297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001247727,0.0000026095213,0.0012445634,0.0000019971687,0.0000052030246,0.000003088816,0.0060176672,2.6934532e-7,0.000029373306,0.9922846,0.000096738586,0.0003014285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014487491,0.000102786995,0.64216304,0.00014471605,0.0000806496,0.000055160523,0.010910569,0.00002971705,0.000028533314,0.33642262,0.008467291,0.00014615594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.111613676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038220484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.655862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005375745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060256646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W212718114","doi":"","title":"Assisted Suicide -- what next?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Appeal; Assisted suicide; Active listening; Democracy; Political science; Law; Psychology; Criminology; Politics; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.03495969732858355,"score_gpt":0.31502527870112756,"score_spread":0.280065581372544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W212718114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9199729,0.028526844,0.00024708844,0.038386397,0.0011142254,0.00051356445,3.6025475e-7,0.0001590371,0.011079608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9524289,0.038199652,0.00010054588,0.0003273394,0.00077477994,0.000017539363,0.000001042807,0.000013697339,0.008136545],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99594855,0.0002641336,0.00026035283,0.00017529582,0.00053848897,0.0028131965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917555,0.00011518618,0.00016112794,0.000097082564,0.00026931232,0.00018174418],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014879383,0.00015078204,0.00020629365,0.000042998312,0.0016306097,0.0012529396,0.00039424057,0.000111379224,0.0005474737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003238833,0.000113802125,0.00015653874,0.00024388549,0.00023565885,0.0032180466,0.000048393176,0.0013166487,0.0005758413],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017649407,0.00011956877,0.005458892,0.0000052704804,0.0004504236,0.000006079605,0.016925665,0.000006513751,0.0012665228,0.23143369,0.0033514383,0.7409583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010284458,0.00025897997,0.044125713,0.00009556032,0.00009260402,0.000100615835,0.60124654,0.000024182604,0.0000735567,0.22865799,0.12355839,0.00073739723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011372504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024682172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7402209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021012973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009931024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128082881","doi":"10.7202/1000623ar","title":"Roncarelli’s Green Card: The Role of Citizenship in Randian Constitutionalism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Citizenship; Jurisprudence; Law; Economic Justice; Dissenting opinion; Constitution; Political science; Originalism; Constitutional law; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05244010886603593,"score_gpt":0.2818793899479775,"score_spread":0.2294392810819416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128082881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07308534,0.0010567285,0.00000238533,0.0016880811,0.0003540044,0.00020434942,0.000032681688,0.000017398519,0.923559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99926543,0.00017998269,0.00012256847,0.0001140612,0.00019233396,0.0000052227597,5.5692317e-7,0.000004195947,0.00011566658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986559,0.00031295037,0.00026035638,0.000093159484,0.00039904276,0.00027858585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994046,0.0001203913,0.00013611431,0.000071410854,0.00016711024,0.00010034099],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088594446,0.00008737942,0.00017786543,0.000024334982,0.0029843475,0.000021879972,0.00028525313,0.000075146425,0.0002431726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001320587,0.00005459236,0.00011709051,0.00013041375,0.0009703059,0.00011643434,0.00004161141,0.00027532896,0.000018612433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028081055,0.00002293704,0.01326591,0.0000029613007,0.00006439769,0.00001856828,0.021648047,0.000005271329,0.000026075744,0.96248806,0.00010136771,0.0023283334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001529165,0.00008509209,0.049532373,0.00011483648,0.000079352,0.000049563565,0.056826055,0.0000065042314,0.0009065059,0.079657316,0.8108472,0.0003659891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.105060205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1283307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92618006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016282151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021674165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130906830","doi":"10.7202/706459ar","title":"Intervention de groupe et approche féministe en santé mentale","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Service social","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026563807737596343,"score_gpt":0.34586298938359084,"score_spread":0.31929918164599447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130906830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7177237,0.004567679,0.00013986282,0.20782244,0.0017065346,0.00058589655,0.00007161646,0.00018574086,0.06719648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757378,0.000556939,0.0018581246,0.004892693,0.0055263536,0.000060530332,0.00003774003,0.000031499803,0.011298319],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684787,0.0010780911,0.00039185732,0.00037462558,0.0005538663,0.0007536793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992021,0.00015983035,0.00022445184,0.000097680444,0.0001638663,0.00015210231],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012475703,0.0002871942,0.00033266548,0.00002480792,0.0013638296,0.00014866394,0.000436725,0.0004244674,0.0010637686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008873945,0.00029885294,0.00033615285,0.00048686165,0.00041113913,0.0006774638,0.0002664671,0.00044371295,0.00091471494],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040730625,0.0006173608,0.0006520145,0.00028818793,0.00027083003,0.0000050514436,0.8207576,0.0000100879,0.0004413067,0.08979446,0.008424297,0.078698084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013338021,0.00009524923,0.03161746,0.00016089466,0.0002584254,0.0000036833949,0.32071292,0.00025336354,0.00021391344,0.0038271581,0.64086974,0.0006534174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01494689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03410073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6324454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014195624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008913602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131266742","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2015.17","title":"<i>The Coxford Lecture</i> Patriation and Patrimony: The Path to the Charter","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Parliament; House of Commons; Charter; Law; Constitution; Opposition (politics); Political science; Polity; Supreme court; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Responsible government; Politics","score_opus":0.028279321259348667,"score_gpt":0.28991203106191815,"score_spread":0.2616327098025695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131266742","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4789158,0.021056449,0.00025307966,0.48675534,0.0036137227,0.001101012,0.000027788834,0.000020293992,0.008256503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954205,0.00042123112,0.000054540877,0.0029524416,0.0009269194,0.000007088039,2.0522906e-7,0.0000061296564,0.00021089891],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998451,0.00032583045,0.00025175075,0.000102659666,0.0004795348,0.00038924202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982606,0.00033088576,0.0001992181,0.00014187238,0.00045250563,0.00061488233],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021256702,0.00010479284,0.00013495525,0.00001692458,0.0026439507,0.0004372568,0.0006028859,0.00005892985,0.000009461016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009053837,0.000046179437,0.00006839431,0.00020888881,0.00056852587,0.0002166667,0.000028679291,0.00028221792,0.00001318284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010075131,0.000017875947,0.028612727,0.000014135502,0.00020072018,0.00010469028,0.5183167,0.0001328557,0.00007881254,0.08038308,0.29845145,0.07358618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013763404,0.000070957794,0.005868115,0.000024788089,0.000027782999,0.000010961692,0.007756939,0.0000039229526,0.000016073127,0.0014522579,0.9845428,0.00008780106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09549289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.675356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6860913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029017913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073535374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131284740","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.01296.x","title":"PARENTAL ALIENATION: CANADIAN COURT CASES 1989–2008","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Citation; Family court; Sociology; Law; History; Library science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04782442497088262,"score_gpt":0.3398939775480977,"score_spread":0.29206955257721506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131284740","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12524442,0.34784508,0.000008860213,0.2697962,0.008381438,0.0044027055,0.0003605543,0.00053802726,0.24342273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89204,0.09768455,0.00034019814,0.0061644185,0.0008200026,0.000101388556,0.000045786554,0.000016910724,0.0027867365],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981549,0.00016112464,0.00030756663,0.00028450674,0.00056417246,0.0005277623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875563,0.00015760971,0.00011528093,0.00021570093,0.00030409673,0.00045165553],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007758211,0.00018936288,0.00035394734,0.00003531727,0.0013044643,0.00009124436,0.00037790535,0.0001284248,0.0010820545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010032222,0.00015269055,0.00014958088,0.0002990625,0.0003030809,0.0002283236,0.000044817814,0.00032301046,0.00070193113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018320374,0.00006974843,0.015195049,0.00027584023,0.00006866989,0.00010530361,0.003937737,6.3836427e-7,0.00006224007,0.0076197297,0.95210904,0.020554177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007639806,0.000014730116,0.023542412,0.00034453956,0.000050930325,0.000007911522,0.001271263,0.000002501472,0.000002077845,0.00003604552,0.97442925,0.00022192241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5327355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8437976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7667956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003099982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004469676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131415381","doi":"10.1002/crq.3890190205","title":"Advice by any other name…","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conflict Resolution Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Neutrality; Impartiality; Mediation; Intervention (counseling); Context (archaeology); Autonomy; Law; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Public relations","score_opus":0.0291854469014019,"score_gpt":0.3138707570777506,"score_spread":0.2846853101763487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131415381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51021117,0.009422679,0.0012240362,0.032844458,0.0012506669,0.0012371702,0.00006262128,0.0015054038,0.4422418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95056885,0.00031816043,0.0002023242,0.0011349522,0.0006572915,0.000059233953,0.00001076645,0.000019564715,0.04702884],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982605,0.0002278308,0.00023862899,0.00028494076,0.00044062306,0.0005474756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992697,0.000093156465,0.00010929488,0.00017371016,0.0001693212,0.00018477038],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038635923,0.00015804122,0.0001857389,0.000031438954,0.0010069724,0.00012449324,0.00025872013,0.0001524952,0.0009975979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008691922,0.00014068857,0.000097224016,0.00024960295,0.00039501616,0.00030714093,0.00001396758,0.00015361514,0.0007934431],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014399961,0.0003529413,0.014833086,0.000026161719,0.00021324895,0.000023414705,0.35734195,0.000007676617,0.003662411,0.037517924,0.5015994,0.084277846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003181907,0.000099375386,0.00456145,0.000012796295,0.000012825281,0.000001281034,0.011766305,0.00007464298,0.000011960863,0.000089610054,0.9828474,0.00020416247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018991964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002884173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48124805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023414784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040309897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132778664","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0025.2011.01733.x","title":"Ministers of the Law: A Natural Law Theory of Legal Authority – By Jean Porter","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Natural law; Philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Political science; History","score_opus":0.033251947240573204,"score_gpt":0.281199403572243,"score_spread":0.24794745633166979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132778664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64102817,0.0007726257,0.0001479791,0.0022842544,0.00082155905,0.00034169178,0.000029510553,0.00004648736,0.3545277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940689,0.000010414624,0.000121980614,0.00046239237,0.00004441106,0.00000813879,0.0000013544998,0.0000070299675,0.0052753855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984419,0.0006209903,0.00023874211,0.00018254912,0.00022579942,0.00029007084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923736,0.00022021732,0.00019319731,0.00020753579,0.00009862287,0.000043081658],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060909864,0.00011711727,0.0002720585,0.000009519722,0.0003745142,0.000006873773,0.0004788115,0.00013286197,0.00015432811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013293404,0.000071032206,0.00015094475,0.000064026164,0.0036481954,0.0001156847,0.00016781983,0.00017570065,0.00000494638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005834401,0.00005693647,0.0012108315,0.0000074048467,0.00006646263,8.1568487e-7,0.053236652,3.0548722e-7,0.0007965713,0.94371426,0.0004133661,0.0004380709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011396747,0.00024726964,0.014846656,0.000045573368,0.00023314785,0.0000054612237,0.024641119,0.00010101597,0.015825171,0.9040376,0.038255088,0.0006222516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020584112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009936719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3530407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038035843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026303003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133808670","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.21.1.55","title":"Penguins and Polyamory: Using Law and Film to Explore the Essence of Marriage in Canadian Family Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Legalization; Context (archaeology); Family law; Sociology; Popularity; Law; Sodomy; Value (mathematics); Gender studies; Criminology; Political science; History; Homosexuality","score_opus":0.054451489957730026,"score_gpt":0.29393273377880597,"score_spread":0.23948124382107594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133808670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9520561,0.001628658,0.000001236824,0.02636313,0.00011019646,0.0002427785,0.000021695148,0.00000228638,0.019573936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99243987,0.00017121808,0.00004270323,0.007046995,0.00012297704,0.0000032421453,3.345003e-7,0.000006608988,0.0001660462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986874,0.00021719265,0.00026126442,0.00012859507,0.00013795425,0.0005675851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986025,0.00017746854,0.000129668,0.000099875964,0.0000884884,0.00090199057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013734002,0.00012571957,0.00033337268,0.00007102483,0.00096795394,0.00018096951,0.0002605744,0.00006515022,0.000014229881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016981122,0.0000841681,0.00004148625,0.000193461,0.0010636701,0.00023249404,0.000022899363,0.00023877577,5.096686e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025031848,0.0000046661266,0.0026029819,0.000012290498,0.000032852764,0.00007167536,0.2000564,0.000022419861,0.000050723724,0.7966103,0.00014494573,0.00036573436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003564915,0.0004547763,0.126897,0.0008303515,0.00012826265,0.00017055123,0.51802135,0.00014077344,0.000054690914,0.16764052,0.18116547,0.00093133486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91508394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9883504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6289697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005027787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037099657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7444817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136048620","doi":"","title":"Why Marriage is Still the Best Default in Estate Planning Conflicts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Estate; Cohabitation; Estate planning; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03467643524819757,"score_gpt":0.30600192831716455,"score_spread":0.27132549306896697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136048620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87831736,0.00083447987,0.000007153919,0.021623284,0.00046064283,0.0009065954,0.000016021071,0.000121377765,0.09771308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98559386,0.00023989954,0.00023420372,0.0076901885,0.00036648507,0.00015318235,0.0000040721848,0.000019380888,0.0056987084],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782854,0.0002961534,0.00030713304,0.0003368537,0.00054427894,0.0006870169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988609,0.00037173906,0.000121035984,0.00024211037,0.00016578137,0.00023841523],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055306125,0.00021358907,0.0002611232,0.000026632248,0.0010323497,0.00040663997,0.0005243103,0.00014499611,0.0011579811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053533394,0.00014439167,0.00009080681,0.0003034247,0.0005884416,0.00062129926,0.00015384892,0.00043507686,0.001509379],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006327561,0.00032611788,0.17301072,0.00009862332,0.00030215914,0.0001316704,0.5271598,0.00043198018,0.0016280907,0.046913866,0.23980759,0.010126077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004473914,0.000030087878,0.025467813,0.00008200394,0.000017333554,8.1549473e-7,0.030462284,0.00005665927,0.00012886296,0.0010703497,0.94192606,0.0003103279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29528993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04639241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7021185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020840613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041834355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138651256","doi":"10.1177/0964663911418719","title":"The Crown in a Multicultural Age: The Changing Epistemology of (Post)colonial Sovereignty","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Sociology; Law; Sovereignty; Honour; State (computer science); Scrutiny; Colonialism; Indigenous; Doctrine; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.04925453594051131,"score_gpt":0.35955331606683916,"score_spread":0.31029878012632783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138651256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9511837,0.00941063,5.639352e-7,0.026633287,0.0014058957,0.00080530095,0.000010183576,0.00006480226,0.010485661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995242,0.00060811144,0.000028929715,0.0002943051,0.001782677,0.00014696547,0.0000016002217,0.000011913467,0.001883506],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967956,0.0008273503,0.00044229926,0.00021031627,0.00057092024,0.0011535122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980113,0.001183887,0.00027029202,0.000115105875,0.00035350886,0.00006590315],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019549513,0.00024132176,0.00049282296,0.000034712826,0.005922125,0.000090089095,0.00046354427,0.00015583304,0.000021987615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020541174,0.00012508983,0.00025676747,0.0005539464,0.003340716,0.00034380276,0.0004075967,0.00038420546,0.000021505315],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009250001,0.00009085274,0.0068500014,0.000027111877,0.00035120375,0.000007356022,0.8324663,0.00000233077,0.00011622445,0.15428756,0.0027256696,0.0029828816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007215041,0.00006364637,0.19329146,0.000035634934,0.00010398689,0.0000018791367,0.6505955,0.0000023829887,0.00009107737,0.0011942615,0.15352592,0.00037273197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013988631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03481054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18644147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051460793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000624325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99937165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139087767","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01412.x","title":"THE “EYE OF THE BEHOLDER”: PROFESSIONAL OPINIONS ABOUT THE BEST INTERESTS OF A CHILD","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Child custody; State (computer science); Function (biology); Best interests; Psychology; Political science; Law; Empirical research; Social psychology; Public relations; Computer science","score_opus":0.1021398112332396,"score_gpt":0.37622963121187525,"score_spread":0.27408981997863563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139087767","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05432821,0.6389264,0.000005261682,0.1579866,0.0038530075,0.0050288746,0.000104118735,0.000055498505,0.13971202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8099072,0.18491298,0.00003924015,0.001908975,0.00019341521,0.00014814614,0.0000022931026,0.000010603032,0.0028771788],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981372,0.00057596114,0.00041006086,0.00013376249,0.00051031454,0.00023273287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998707,0.00030298217,0.00035635757,0.00034741807,0.00024384688,0.000042426607],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00118213,0.00012158877,0.00028112682,0.0000061786823,0.0014497485,0.000014367537,0.0009919098,0.000057649188,0.000058552792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007764202,0.000044344746,0.0002556975,0.00026424415,0.0011659518,0.000069958944,0.00027573842,0.0002686039,0.000026460279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044577613,0.0010695433,0.066657774,0.0030026513,0.0008995767,0.000002089551,0.15515871,0.0000010623138,0.00013638794,0.22382244,0.44983396,0.09937125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074822776,0.000021476739,0.23673287,0.0053469995,0.00008919033,3.6220487e-7,0.007568746,6.520386e-7,0.000016017055,0.00020505197,0.7498586,0.00008519003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002568328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017543902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.755579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040130537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011025395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139515735","doi":"10.15496/publikation-57927","title":"Canadian Judicial Nomination Processes and the Press : ‘Interesting, in a Sleepy Sort of Way’","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Supreme court; Politics; Political science; Law; Judicial activism; Federalist; Sociology","score_opus":0.028050422262285463,"score_gpt":0.33282146231807874,"score_spread":0.30477104005579325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139515735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9233731,0.00033673114,0.000011028623,0.013688909,0.000080123275,0.00030051183,0.0000010667653,0.000014766196,0.062193766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987061,0.000058811587,0.00004495516,0.00006123054,0.00009016848,0.000016212369,4.0605443e-7,0.0000026911675,0.0010194015],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999404,0.000118644886,0.000089292684,0.00009115196,0.00013240306,0.00016447646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950874,0.0002355091,0.00006240661,0.00004313559,0.00009940666,0.00005082113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051290763,0.0000509211,0.00011170697,0.000019458139,0.00026212182,0.000029001245,0.00010892143,0.000038094207,0.000015846157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018871663,0.000033771634,0.000013079644,0.00011130202,0.00034987472,0.000064973254,0.00002572579,0.00006031895,0.0000016262434],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005466789,0.000029889716,0.05039148,0.00010024351,0.00002815052,0.0000012556293,0.8761962,0.000025324083,0.000049955106,0.05983986,0.0017015939,0.011581375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047062454,0.00015883455,0.49713036,0.0004513653,0.0001208978,0.000001643499,0.24940789,0.0014171592,0.0010686461,0.008004812,0.23672043,0.0008117092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88824207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9623513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6267883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009434026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000074368145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22592507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139791020","doi":"10.3138/ecf.24.3.403","title":"Rethinking Gender and Virtue through Richardson's Domestic Accounting","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Soundness; Accounting; Order (exchange); Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Political science; Linguistics; Finance","score_opus":0.04180827621645613,"score_gpt":0.30995365895821786,"score_spread":0.26814538274176175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139791020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8604725,0.033727672,0.00055042893,0.000994767,0.0054377355,0.0007368962,0.000009683209,0.00049619836,0.097574145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895551,0.0072724507,0.0010175135,0.00020385702,0.0017511267,0.000025673793,0.000009758709,0.000017632063,0.00014686429],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817157,0.00020816636,0.00022831147,0.00027990967,0.0005531138,0.00055895187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930495,0.00017390402,0.00016059467,0.000118598815,0.00010865714,0.00013326966],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007249464,0.00019173163,0.00019779566,0.000037327136,0.0019690644,0.00015704149,0.00012704119,0.00018660004,0.0001443335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029181901,0.00016207281,0.00007909379,0.00025791881,0.00022534776,0.001422603,0.000103366925,0.00027347228,0.000077788005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060545655,0.00041454408,0.17494667,0.00015400178,0.00033011404,0.000009136887,0.4346267,0.000014621898,0.0015113578,0.3517226,0.026960952,0.0092487475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008107663,0.000039662245,0.22735709,0.00009232321,0.00020440272,0.0000106644975,0.034471747,0.00007557446,0.0001716883,0.0018843465,0.7340814,0.00080032565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009859846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035351117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7071205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003342886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022467191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139881082","doi":"10.15353/cjds.v4i3.231","title":"Reflections on Law in Light of Everyday Life at L’Arche","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Disability Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Scrutiny; Law; Harm; Agency (philosophy); Pluralism (philosophy); Legal pluralism; Epistemology; Legal profession; Political science; Legal realism; Social science","score_opus":0.23962813401024216,"score_gpt":0.42983948222294655,"score_spread":0.19021134821270438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139881082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8767064,0.003559995,2.6248065e-7,0.05220355,0.00082572235,0.00020422222,0.000015425418,0.0000071275185,0.06647725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987916,0.00014031246,0.00006468972,0.00026913694,0.00023622734,0.0000053311464,2.425127e-7,0.0000050833764,0.0004874265],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982564,0.0003939107,0.00047469497,0.00013446194,0.0003917532,0.00034881264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980288,0.0003994069,0.00019917391,0.00012086618,0.00060236367,0.00064937444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014812121,0.00011701023,0.00041675917,0.000060390503,0.00061115297,0.000020731355,0.00022513779,0.00007199213,0.000034054498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007141792,0.000088067834,0.00013338412,0.00034584463,0.002008139,0.00018628336,0.000037574187,0.00022322277,0.000010060283],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010516258,0.00024813568,0.35825557,0.00006358114,0.00047365858,0.000025377378,0.54902124,0.00017980057,0.000038357233,0.050318807,0.040697865,0.00057242817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088613795,0.00041613323,0.14546321,0.00019139693,0.000073770934,0.0000028810455,0.42043382,6.572905e-7,0.00013328416,0.0074949833,0.42460608,0.0002976362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.118068516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9442757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82620716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036220266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006579215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94714737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141784587","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1449","title":"Relational Contract and Other Models of Marriage","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Supreme court; Compensation (psychology); Flexibility (engineering); Relational contract; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Law; Social contract; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.08311789173557932,"score_gpt":0.293750347285705,"score_spread":0.21063245555012566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141784587","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021529088,0.0022035844,0.00019966389,0.0030186982,0.00017158117,0.000114490045,0.0000118653625,0.000020142972,0.9727309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966043,0.0004013442,0.0013029374,0.00020204442,0.00027590926,0.0000017938315,2.122993e-7,0.0000068067116,0.0012046191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893105,0.00014783329,0.00022195837,0.00009568215,0.00039288754,0.00021059568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994078,0.00014340259,0.00016156484,0.000046679714,0.00011677754,0.00012376816],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046652358,0.000081267804,0.00015819544,0.000015303114,0.00094287423,0.00006483208,0.00010342466,0.00008140334,0.0012609636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009058676,0.00006251218,0.000070214475,0.00005149074,0.0003601109,0.00037766492,0.000023254393,0.00019891455,0.00001572148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007536041,0.000039448078,0.0022909192,0.0000033552446,0.000052741718,0.000005101885,0.009791041,0.00009937198,0.000079357036,0.9857636,0.00068388705,0.0011836515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054418673,0.00027024065,0.02654265,0.00034529038,0.0002620275,0.00017310612,0.014864456,0.00902117,0.00020978351,0.6743827,0.26723132,0.0012554267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026144003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03347264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97507524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006378808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009901828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143369584","doi":"10.24043/isj.233","title":"Island Words, Island Worlds: The Origins and Meanings of Words for ‘Islands’ in North-West Europe","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Island Studies Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Linguistic relativity; Linguistics; History; Geography; Philosophy; Psychology; Cognition; Computer science","score_opus":0.03600193495479402,"score_gpt":0.3263464874746684,"score_spread":0.29034455251987434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143369584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9639565,0.013545836,0.000102544815,0.011891171,0.0006426063,0.0006598081,0.000051231662,0.000027410402,0.009122894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822882,0.014792596,0.0001594253,0.00027077267,0.0008947335,0.000015130877,0.0000019173706,0.000011965018,0.0015652609],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782556,0.00023872344,0.00056296657,0.00026255878,0.0005115199,0.00059865246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982922,0.0007214111,0.0003395235,0.000121923775,0.000419452,0.00010545571],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012537834,0.0002634986,0.0005878894,0.00009738909,0.0017015652,0.00017661304,0.00033778517,0.00007515329,0.00003024049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001072501,0.00014966194,0.00012488478,0.00056739984,0.0005641462,0.0002668545,0.00008478675,0.0004244665,0.0000031046675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002997471,0.00014549422,0.47573617,0.000051713407,0.00048393282,0.00004395171,0.48131678,0.00005020971,0.000030054802,0.0024642218,0.02795373,0.011423999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049792854,0.0007249317,0.48039293,0.00040673188,0.00027534625,0.0000488032,0.11791907,0.00005267945,0.000016986442,0.0040257955,0.39036736,0.00079006894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043459787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15102077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3633977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016762977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008039104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144679562","doi":"","title":"Rob Ford and the End of Honour","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œinnovation journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Accountability; Politics; Law; Honour; Impunity; Impeachment; Sociology; Redress; Political science","score_opus":0.028220912771818044,"score_gpt":0.2996783678982941,"score_spread":0.27145745512647607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144679562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8644202,0.00034185816,0.0030134304,0.10042291,0.00067594065,0.00029018603,0.0000016425166,0.000021083319,0.030812776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976044,0.000085572145,0.00024908246,0.0004862856,0.0005294527,0.000003269335,2.9700934e-7,0.0000028781483,0.0010387189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990184,0.00024532917,0.00024217545,0.000053688873,0.0003061505,0.00013429666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989972,0.00026410157,0.00027176438,0.00007651327,0.0003684922,0.00002192613],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026402462,0.00005342989,0.000106862346,0.000026756055,0.0013062999,0.00009870915,0.0002283707,0.00003275896,0.00007071341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006189693,0.000024713863,0.000035251443,0.0003390378,0.00068572426,0.0001312137,0.00004647355,0.000177635,0.0000042489687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006777292,0.000026203921,0.010227745,0.000008729044,0.000114478935,4.2975162e-7,0.06972452,0.00003227678,0.00057485903,0.8222857,0.015082141,0.08185515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027172663,0.00008050861,0.13159136,0.00004311907,0.00006239114,0.000020148966,0.034322232,0.0004365126,0.00014489451,0.10956794,0.72078747,0.00022615727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042797218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004621685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7127178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003409273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033259847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146611038","doi":"10.1017/s000842390427010x","title":"Women's Legal Strategies in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Harm; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.021430259661100546,"score_gpt":0.28752328647730746,"score_spread":0.2660930268162069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146611038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9690908,0.00006721655,0.000008627004,0.013581753,0.000531266,0.00005661536,0.0000047361723,0.000002732514,0.01665624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989336,0.0000038421485,0.00014239637,0.0006619715,0.00018885531,0.0000013995635,4.7574336e-8,0.000002776299,0.00006510788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997153,0.00005363303,0.00027813995,0.00012653472,0.0006937833,0.0016949074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968356,0.00007284318,0.000069589696,0.000063448075,0.00029332968,0.0026652073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010068625,0.000086028966,0.0001766958,0.00013563361,0.00071563094,0.00025782347,0.0006164628,0.000034116805,0.00014041916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015010197,0.00006999039,0.000032357766,0.00060737494,0.0018834242,0.00085768854,0.000016776105,0.0002554988,0.000006117525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011843207,0.0000042048005,0.00574842,0.0000018716642,0.0000025153495,0.00021756707,0.0063520228,0.00011961731,0.00002921493,0.98724407,0.00007185384,0.00020745782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041786855,0.00006998974,0.73240626,0.00006126868,0.00000466492,0.000031187345,0.21545786,0.00000319016,0.00011013673,0.032767296,0.018409092,0.00026119128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99989986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9544768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02039679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09295446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98336375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146858425","doi":"10.1017/s0008423902778190","title":"Health Care as Citizenship Development: Examining Social Rights and Entitlement","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Right to health; Health care; Political science; Citizenship; Individualism; Health care reform; Politics; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Normative; Law and economics; Health policy; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.06983479212860008,"score_gpt":0.33510879639768903,"score_spread":0.265274004269089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146858425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9449408,0.0010269627,0.000006975014,0.0125435805,0.0003675694,0.000105978,0.0000051841375,0.000008225786,0.040994693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979949,0.000004916115,0.00050804974,0.00074490736,0.0003220038,8.3047297e-7,1.9657853e-7,0.000002995283,0.00042117812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774104,0.0000978585,0.00027503996,0.00015076039,0.0006047981,0.0011304861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974115,0.000069989146,0.00010543317,0.000038763876,0.00030635766,0.0020679883],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089099223,0.00008813828,0.00017722741,0.00012404704,0.0037221406,0.00023048041,0.0003105314,0.00004349896,0.00042589995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006084894,0.000071454015,0.000030620125,0.0002610016,0.0018490871,0.00020320657,0.000026340385,0.00016393403,0.00003078162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.862197e-7,0.0000067388128,0.004661894,0.000013237843,0.000016060172,0.00004760236,0.24122241,1.5243975e-7,0.000012037215,0.741288,0.004166191,0.008564677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081892055,0.00029060344,0.64327013,0.00019799545,0.000032134812,0.000063841035,0.14748943,0.0000056080266,0.00024236989,0.010451748,0.19646637,0.0006708697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10797407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14873396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7308363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002056706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018839834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99757487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147152902","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2012.00242.x","title":"Policy-based reasoning in duty of care cases","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Welfare; Interpersonal communication; Economic Justice; Imperfect; Duty of care; Sample (material); Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0574952330479269,"score_gpt":0.3888278032987518,"score_spread":0.33133257025082485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147152902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94884545,0.023582662,0.0000018248419,0.0038196733,0.00037653078,0.00029922905,0.000014734805,0.00007520433,0.022984684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99803376,0.00046500063,0.00044096832,0.00014646574,0.00049724145,0.00003834442,0.0000015543837,0.000008078891,0.00036856896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851537,0.00018575937,0.00023610429,0.00015012683,0.0003692968,0.0005433336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910456,0.0003899584,0.0001083435,0.00009672485,0.00021686337,0.000083539446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003630958,0.00014657997,0.00036232316,0.00006650119,0.0006068319,0.00001906013,0.00014326777,0.000068476686,0.000014809458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026026396,0.000115045026,0.0000977058,0.00044269816,0.0005874332,0.0002852982,0.000104116436,0.00012422934,0.000011713015],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004195413,0.00010744338,0.62617975,0.00015695086,0.00012507083,0.000014516357,0.32267818,0.000044154127,0.000068970025,0.04683323,0.0010100895,0.0027397086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080274564,0.00012441292,0.36950445,0.00032323005,0.00006788273,0.0000012760563,0.52838194,0.0000038003925,0.0012054421,0.00013259047,0.09893874,0.0005135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072313175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036491644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25667527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004910778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009293419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9810899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147912637","doi":"10.1017/s0034670500036597","title":"Getting a Facelift - David Braybrooke: Natural Law Modernized. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001. Pp. Xiii, 351. $70.00.)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Politics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Political science; Natural (archaeology); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02910546585285181,"score_gpt":0.31470936155353285,"score_spread":0.28560389570068107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147912637","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003202839,0.8235993,0.000010894451,0.002101369,0.00025767813,0.00082378456,0.000051829167,0.000051295723,0.16990106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30104512,0.6902524,0.0011636466,0.0007569363,0.00018418218,0.0000039912093,0.0000066268,0.000018535226,0.0065685445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761736,0.0006740722,0.0003795008,0.00020451916,0.000580659,0.00054389733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854404,0.00029261262,0.0003556818,0.00034374584,0.00033062004,0.00013330756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010473204,0.0001951018,0.0005585637,0.000001577194,0.0007283348,0.000018364439,0.00057598436,0.000089238725,0.0005237095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073916663,0.00014028836,0.00024969276,0.00004509126,0.0008889381,0.00034068568,0.0001439598,0.00015640045,0.000009965502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010669625,0.00014210539,0.00021436566,0.0035704938,0.00029240368,0.0000033741514,0.03864001,0.000008194723,0.00019877394,0.9149715,0.039829746,0.0021183996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025907712,0.000023267492,0.00025255844,0.0013696835,0.00019802203,0.0000010906653,0.0077791545,0.000022140908,0.00012498618,0.0007935968,0.9889434,0.00023301621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29972526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040675968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94911367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060368585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012401128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9768292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148682650","doi":"","title":"Editors' Introduction: Indignation, Socio-economic Inequality and the Role of Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indignation; Economic inequality; Inequality; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Sociology; Criminology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2003393846415093,"score_gpt":0.5265616311312397,"score_spread":0.32622224648973036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148682650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9359687,0.017949967,0.000015382851,0.010574323,0.004432211,0.00084272854,0.000036946887,0.00004116963,0.030138556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99066275,0.0028796163,0.000056002966,0.000118223375,0.0060189567,0.000030331545,0.0000036924966,0.000011829756,0.00021857137],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973045,0.0008311804,0.00066094106,0.00026705855,0.00068122096,0.00025510657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764323,0.00049658894,0.00086972147,0.0002088459,0.00059352553,0.00018805666],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004691254,0.00017071111,0.00057449815,0.0000950938,0.0008908729,0.0006857198,0.0012995707,0.00011285705,0.0012902449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010965854,0.000118539814,0.00011676241,0.00028108913,0.0015605609,0.002213861,0.00060163677,0.00025837592,0.000010435132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041132863,0.0002146008,0.5652762,0.00004975664,0.000610073,0.0000015293732,0.080932885,0.00016612331,0.0012770564,0.08818584,0.25496218,0.007912395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018167961,0.000013348375,0.223135,0.00006882595,0.00014562804,0.0000018713641,0.027711466,0.000027389995,0.002750457,0.1365135,0.60733664,0.0004790825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04142481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012918062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35237446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029717764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018851225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149513766","doi":"","title":"Sex and the Supremes: Towards a Legal Theory of Sexuality","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human sexuality; Gender studies; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.006938306616129642,"score_gpt":0.19576675187090356,"score_spread":0.1888284452547739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149513766","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6310568,0.00027406818,0.0000071500253,0.01837152,0.00019411782,0.00021300423,0.00008071943,0.000007622286,0.349795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897399,0.00014872375,0.00020142828,0.00057987,0.00008202764,0.000005608767,7.1539563e-7,0.0000048914358,0.009236831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980313,0.00024507687,0.00018883754,0.00013966615,0.0011886302,0.00020647478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998949,0.00068602135,0.00011429139,0.000111763686,0.0000011687678,0.00013778267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009862209,0.000104533945,0.00022130161,0.00000494333,0.00048059784,0.000026386006,0.00021131257,0.000025274696,0.000043536995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047201935,0.000067381196,0.00002464551,0.000048673697,0.0010670478,0.00024678832,0.00014956496,0.00015419566,6.7817835e-10],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023052563,0.000013824226,0.014007187,0.00005161505,0.00007947491,0.0000044666263,0.0070388587,9.374459e-7,0.002888748,0.9653651,0.00041340996,0.009905826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001977208,0.00008196692,0.36551446,0.0000700137,0.000101672296,0.000004154387,0.25634572,0.00018609072,0.040652957,0.03329431,0.30118224,0.0005892214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09894069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34223714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9320708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000041624444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008209763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90705955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151063462","doi":"","title":"The Academic Year in Review: Selected Family Law Publications 2010-11","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Legislation; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.023439981720349713,"score_gpt":0.3260461761196724,"score_spread":0.3026061943993227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151063462","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1285766,0.32667968,0.00009112144,0.48912996,0.00067173765,0.0014394638,0.0000037746179,0.00025810904,0.053149547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6183982,0.37172198,0.000026148042,0.0013741489,0.00039788475,0.000015439105,0.0000019750491,0.000007395952,0.008056825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966834,0.0003678481,0.00034673052,0.00015803255,0.00046488238,0.0019790672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919355,0.00013729288,0.00017528642,0.0001169582,0.0002808906,0.00009599683],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003424294,0.000118920056,0.00017579575,0.000034914345,0.0018125837,0.00010301823,0.00060112204,0.00011346959,0.000018664998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088356197,0.00007800913,0.00008576232,0.00082782964,0.00021232928,0.000354113,0.000023288709,0.0021795947,0.000056970046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061377764,0.000027645081,0.0021774822,0.000002645143,0.00003263194,3.830082e-7,0.0015444637,0.0000010954464,0.00011836342,0.96186817,0.025263552,0.00895744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040008526,0.00008250822,0.052626748,0.00012793152,0.000038640042,0.000012999303,0.009573581,0.0000034814,0.0000061887813,0.11271461,0.8241601,0.00025312335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00217058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047323182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8491535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015131516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012685115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153339687","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720130902.2558","title":"Influence of Culture over Marital Love and Fidelity in Ancient Rome and Ugboha of Edo State","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fidelity; Order (exchange); State (computer science); Sociology; Content (measure theory); Literature; History; Art; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.013784838200123852,"score_gpt":0.2894973531261724,"score_spread":0.2757125149260486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153339687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98686785,0.0005969887,3.3231342e-7,0.00035775825,0.000071893955,0.00018697609,0.000056428187,0.0000042501138,0.011857554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995031,0.000087356355,0.00006511249,0.00014670927,0.00005073487,0.000002275108,4.264467e-7,0.0000024278713,0.00014190318],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984885,0.000065870074,0.00019553027,0.00019477676,0.00043371003,0.00062161504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991441,0.000045041783,0.000102575425,0.00006003223,0.00019196095,0.00045633677],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010600027,0.00009058373,0.00018977624,0.000072440394,0.00047152975,0.000040667128,0.00020887752,0.00007409895,0.000020425055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000568989,0.0000802904,0.000024132578,0.0006764031,0.0033747533,0.00070897967,0.0000888837,0.00011096823,0.0000020439784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032808168,0.000017619719,0.7923091,0.000020164405,0.000004765484,0.0000012540949,0.19517034,0.0000029234268,0.0021490306,0.008590808,0.00026114448,0.0014695518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104287035,0.000012027025,0.9795381,0.000015038573,0.000003977348,2.270712e-7,0.014311886,0.0000033812976,0.00008131447,0.00025738304,0.0055636177,0.0001087518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28634062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22123124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.187229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005056895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036811072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154326197","doi":"10.7202/1008148ar","title":"L’union libre, le mariage romain et le mariage chrétien","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Enfances Familles Générations","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030089543165289098,"score_gpt":0.3147338605324139,"score_spread":0.2846443173671248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154326197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.114480704,0.030709451,0.001069022,0.09236787,0.0066606286,0.0010922564,0.0002498443,0.00033532048,0.7530349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9051418,0.005484887,0.003041117,0.0010214063,0.0020872152,0.00016811468,0.000121542944,0.00004595444,0.08288799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959142,0.0012891439,0.0005587275,0.00047748585,0.0006533179,0.0011071248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827117,0.0005677637,0.00031196783,0.00034322133,0.00014893682,0.0003569429],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012838527,0.00041217654,0.000475076,0.00007182087,0.003223365,0.000303225,0.00051029254,0.00037057666,0.0004677331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038145555,0.0004127012,0.00027497797,0.00083591987,0.0012378719,0.0028196718,0.00030926874,0.00046627966,0.00058961066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000086476075,0.00052251277,0.006007167,0.000044452667,0.00016700677,0.0000034859181,0.061491724,0.00011103288,0.00044167126,0.88016975,0.0434388,0.007593747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063594093,0.00006165466,0.094476976,0.000080211,0.00008693801,0.0000029208875,0.054641843,0.00013878243,0.00014476311,0.004865566,0.8441858,0.00067856355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02271113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00853405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87530416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028328673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034393824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154577241","doi":"10.1177/174035530500300216","title":"Patricia Bays, Anglican Diversity: Challenges for the 21st Century (Toronto: ABC Publishing, 2001), pp. 128. ISBN 1-55126-327-0, pbk. US$11.95.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Anglican Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Diversity (politics); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07238933906941378,"score_gpt":0.3310435114781334,"score_spread":0.2586541724087196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154577241","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09482565,0.6478579,0.0000097924285,0.23356268,0.0028487593,0.0011856861,0.00010916998,0.00015711327,0.01944324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51056427,0.48002827,0.00069198594,0.0016171103,0.0061868047,0.000030837364,0.000001992496,0.000030651376,0.000848107],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99617976,0.0003187625,0.00072880526,0.00037857625,0.0013988949,0.0009952032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99482596,0.0017608566,0.0010101673,0.0002693705,0.0017973325,0.00033634278],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002575856,0.0003977233,0.00086837553,0.000059816724,0.004406142,0.00038171356,0.00124157,0.00019325221,0.00011341576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034613837,0.00025024576,0.00059842574,0.0003293943,0.001019678,0.0020477204,0.0007536544,0.00046130395,0.000007911159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015889287,0.00042195205,0.021284692,0.00008492705,0.002618478,0.000027004588,0.22686398,0.000025266976,0.000017669809,0.009820157,0.6216716,0.11700536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000692005,0.00016104813,0.020216888,0.000053102063,0.0002748364,0.000004337798,0.29423544,0.0000052465475,0.000007361509,0.00014395115,0.6839533,0.00025248362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008889965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09404501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4157386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014466312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015105795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157332901","doi":"","title":"Report on the Recognition of Adult Guardianship Orders from Outside the Province","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Enforcement; Law; Guardian; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.02161333911091996,"score_gpt":0.28321524241576934,"score_spread":0.2616019033048494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157332901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8519896,0.00096090336,0.00014105414,0.12856399,0.00025848733,0.00045675368,0.0000067911074,0.00003725323,0.017585123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943197,0.0023300897,0.0000577458,0.00057380367,0.0009927362,0.0000123635045,0.0000025179734,0.000008933633,0.0017021388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746925,0.0004073269,0.00031337526,0.00015717887,0.0005897343,0.0010631463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876237,0.0004189158,0.00035546595,0.00014965658,0.00026806732,0.000045554603],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024215346,0.00011662278,0.00014616987,0.00001782552,0.0013025152,0.00007007206,0.0003740993,0.000071961294,0.00008432455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015871135,0.00005862246,0.00015104802,0.0001494001,0.00032320374,0.00017791027,0.000024878216,0.0012380924,0.000058684975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039021976,0.0004087224,0.01931341,0.00001063958,0.0017950615,0.000039864757,0.06665004,0.00018107043,0.00050591823,0.44771254,0.019609584,0.44338292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016025925,0.00057611876,0.02405758,0.00023698852,0.00039226466,0.0001342507,0.28762078,0.000057000165,0.0017310544,0.50753766,0.17514782,0.00090586545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008295654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09620366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44247705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009846512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011344764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158089866","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x12000403","title":"What's Sincerity Got to Do with It? Freedom of Religion in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sincerity; Plaintiff; Law; Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Faith; State (computer science); Freedom of religion; Democracy; Sociology; Human rights; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.02053939208946261,"score_gpt":0.28723724704608883,"score_spread":0.26669785495662623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158089866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96145797,0.00094989326,0.00027891443,0.017780647,0.0014012286,0.0002829944,0.0000067345522,0.000013668226,0.017827937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973295,0.00015913344,0.0014486465,0.00044162502,0.00057852064,0.000003538692,3.482293e-7,0.000007311085,0.000031397933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800783,0.00019932978,0.00031748816,0.000120918696,0.0007683561,0.00058607734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884486,0.00029027616,0.00010034319,0.0000772317,0.00017008619,0.00051721453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066448725,0.000119103395,0.00026262633,0.000022451244,0.000538659,0.00014045893,0.00021982283,0.000059528178,0.00014426584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004159366,0.00008430177,0.00004262562,0.00023698762,0.0003122244,0.0007352416,0.000058714395,0.00032730907,0.000012393137],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006255298,0.00063214777,0.28094405,0.000062348015,0.0001960994,0.00020014655,0.08501152,0.0014135749,0.00021789667,0.59236014,0.027201626,0.011134915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018802824,0.00041114574,0.6061887,0.0012041731,0.00011743729,0.000076502976,0.15823966,0.000058097536,0.00035164854,0.0020085338,0.2283583,0.0011055262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9259389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5903516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010620822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037651547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4142984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159087817","doi":"","title":"A Corner Turned: Supreme Court of Canada Decisions of the Year Past","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Assertion; Nova scotia; Heading (navigation); Political science; High Court; Articulation (sociology); Sociology; Engineering; Ethnology","score_opus":0.04762893357110932,"score_gpt":0.29714022181998734,"score_spread":0.24951128824887803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159087817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17299353,0.10802888,0.0010382556,0.13060047,0.0061114687,0.010293904,0.01471388,0.00029774974,0.55592185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949616,0.0027565195,0.000097293014,0.00076294795,0.00023805545,0.000045438064,0.000028994724,0.000008494877,0.001100658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962033,0.0005709436,0.0008251897,0.0003452084,0.00153904,0.0005163418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995575,0.0012241396,0.00050512585,0.00049647444,0.0020611442,0.0001380949],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010701563,0.00030344469,0.00064531085,0.000019504409,0.0014869892,0.000043961623,0.0010473429,0.00010410921,0.0005875827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016738783,0.00017429494,0.00029689114,0.0004214785,0.0075670974,0.0002521261,0.00029785297,0.00032482157,0.0000152050525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023210074,0.0000665904,0.0016801707,0.00008973845,0.00006233685,0.00000856266,0.00042382485,0.00007591492,0.00006623938,0.9160564,0.08135722,0.0000897768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058146106,0.00007020698,0.010650485,0.0026499426,0.0003862572,0.00005231595,0.0043004896,0.000025721567,0.00023894456,0.0053918003,0.97506183,0.000590533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6245523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76002496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9106646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028225494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026827408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161306650","doi":"10.25071/2564-4033.37274","title":"Reproductive Inequality in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Tomorrow Interdisciplinarity and Internationality","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Reproductive health; Inequality; Value (mathematics); Position (finance); Action (physics); Invocation; Health care; Law and economics; Order (exchange); Government (linguistics); Political science; Right to health; Sociology; Law; Business; Computer science; Computer security; Biology; Population","score_opus":0.04855518873427859,"score_gpt":0.36823004016016253,"score_spread":0.3196748514258839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161306650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8747876,0.00023268472,0.000044544246,0.11691212,0.0005474496,0.0004995169,0.000025685866,0.000028479984,0.0069218655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755394,0.00009746989,0.00016627453,0.0012658304,0.00018840576,0.00008412424,0.000011045878,0.0000045337506,0.0006283795],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977992,0.00047008222,0.00047960956,0.0004024963,0.0004620061,0.0003865701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901927,0.00018602303,0.00017600445,0.00015269658,0.00027217757,0.00019381386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013457867,0.0001266762,0.000265386,0.000036555324,0.0006224281,0.000073301264,0.00021269065,0.000049897022,0.00050992303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061737787,0.000113421134,0.000036746816,0.00016828174,0.00024862748,0.00045838754,0.00027904718,0.0002917049,0.00001758492],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032679483,0.00017144013,0.8377911,0.00011477511,0.000039648065,0.0000046095843,0.09103126,0.000011966256,0.000007374736,0.03787656,0.015367759,0.017550811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018564967,0.0000192133,0.96159416,0.000048442256,0.0000013827996,9.868729e-7,0.021598535,0.00012997912,0.00000980514,0.009651273,0.006620523,0.00014007592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99716765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12380302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003028766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084648083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7920118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161800791","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0056","title":"Propositions and Propositional Acts","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Philosophy; Speech act; Epistemology","score_opus":0.029001187213141138,"score_gpt":0.28673428841779175,"score_spread":0.2577331012046506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161800791","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3354105,0.0038043214,0.00003927319,0.44655252,0.0007267839,0.0004888606,0.00004138651,0.000026776204,0.2129096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974942,0.00004530902,0.00059689645,0.00083745044,0.0008865618,7.6547934e-7,0.0000010177454,0.0000028866318,0.00013488992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992897,0.00006370236,0.0001556544,0.00006867351,0.0002078489,0.00021442244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989758,0.000025391222,0.000096102354,0.00003449947,0.00027512165,0.0005930671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001935264,0.000068277564,0.00011662815,0.000087757086,0.00095702225,0.000088365305,0.000119217344,0.000052817246,0.000092078655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015310099,0.00005584406,0.000056059438,0.00013073612,0.00034152786,0.00029638052,0.000003392523,0.00015208266,0.000008949587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017367176,0.00005010177,0.00345616,0.000011132126,0.00008379546,0.00022547899,0.027523695,0.000009598829,0.00040989983,0.9536521,0.009620697,0.0049399873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011938214,0.00089628174,0.15870206,0.00036016284,0.00014828454,0.00020649597,0.0047443416,0.000005470201,0.00019970105,0.5738738,0.25901505,0.00065451284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028592711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0097245015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6620837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022467393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006122666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7360738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163197924","doi":"","title":"From en ventre sa mere to Thawing an Heir: Posthumously Conceived Children and the Implications for Succession Law in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Ecological succession; Legislation; Law; Estate; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Warrant; Probate; Political science; Sociology; Common law; Business","score_opus":0.022319177134371253,"score_gpt":0.3173481726711056,"score_spread":0.29502899553673434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163197924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94011366,0.0034394409,0.0000027966046,0.055216502,0.00016532523,0.00066733867,0.000058033525,0.0000088283305,0.000328071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99766034,0.00072754064,0.00025361116,0.0008425125,0.00040772607,0.00004208931,0.00000324446,0.000009050865,0.00005389238],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858207,0.00027840096,0.00040001626,0.00016297154,0.00028353487,0.000293015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984016,0.0008308878,0.0002156823,0.00009016675,0.00032466583,0.00013700707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047006947,0.00014575984,0.00042372048,0.00002332015,0.0011202506,0.00013361254,0.00034354275,0.000039125138,0.000018501309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000385878,0.00008386536,0.00007316657,0.0001212975,0.0003411725,0.00049149775,0.00009689581,0.00018395759,0.0000014793026],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000547485,0.00015210286,0.32743102,0.000025176978,0.0015731822,0.000014151134,0.59860283,0.00028353566,0.00078810385,0.021867795,0.022458978,0.026255663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017532571,0.000092128714,0.85500526,0.00011856586,0.000103657825,0.000005034029,0.12761372,0.000009083598,0.000042248805,0.0032183179,0.011797018,0.00024171351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95777446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96473235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52757424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039266268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020336059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86161745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163206879","doi":"10.3138/cjls.27.2.239","title":"Creating Space for Indigenous Storytelling in Courts","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Negotiation; Storytelling; Active listening; Space (punctuation); Inclusion (mineral); State (computer science); Political science; Sociology; Law; Narrative; Gender studies; Communication; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02523413033028936,"score_gpt":0.286187942744622,"score_spread":0.26095381241433263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163206879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98148423,0.0044660806,0.00007776991,0.002304233,0.0008769704,0.00038407653,0.0000383381,0.000009233119,0.010359071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99511975,0.00047041438,0.0013474774,0.0010830307,0.0009616237,0.000011507142,0.0000035292676,0.000022690703,0.000979958],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808115,0.00012256361,0.0003802745,0.00015427424,0.00012186521,0.0011398632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997483,0.00044680588,0.0002911196,0.00008014674,0.00029247857,0.0014064115],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023441839,0.00016814149,0.00041671304,0.000050679166,0.0016508373,0.00011220352,0.00021051934,0.00021757069,0.000034035776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046430074,0.00017693808,0.00025813165,0.0001401311,0.00047136724,0.0005093447,0.000012226821,0.00040497552,9.0160944e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042547276,0.000015443344,0.0097963745,0.00006211677,0.00010231352,0.000017568818,0.79297626,0.000036514284,0.000020454412,0.19508043,0.00055018155,0.00133808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013199684,0.00014630627,0.01439455,0.000356448,0.00015621456,0.000056065022,0.5002502,0.000052464973,0.000025280022,0.005740628,0.4767752,0.0007266629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3836057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4865343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023280377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008769724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163501159","doi":"10.21083/irss.v33i0.518","title":"The Moral Foundations of Constitutional Change in Canada and Scotland at the end of the twentieth century","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Scottish Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Literature; Economic history; Art","score_opus":0.07273860823133964,"score_gpt":0.3547221297209924,"score_spread":0.2819835214896527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163501159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5839562,0.37149322,4.831063e-7,0.036643684,0.0014382863,0.00083228684,0.00014818097,0.0000032228056,0.0054844813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6976942,0.30186272,0.000010854986,0.00018558954,0.000046456833,0.000029855773,0.0000019683857,0.0000010899079,0.000167274],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986392,0.00013627225,0.00035973702,0.000094153125,0.0006586101,0.00011197738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985409,0.00060253206,0.00031312671,0.00008274574,0.00044439497,0.000016316957],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045733716,0.000073429175,0.0002191936,0.000010778138,0.0006418882,0.00000555748,0.00028948963,0.000013319199,0.000041306514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012752936,0.000034818142,0.00006882648,0.0001540509,0.003987457,0.00009083379,0.0002422612,0.00007057963,5.1753483e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012517873,0.000035781017,0.9062665,0.0004650903,0.00043569054,0.00000190956,0.011229581,0.0000041102526,0.000017114797,0.060144335,0.01439541,0.006991957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022419613,0.00000895929,0.86029786,0.0023966022,0.000045669534,0.0000043413365,0.0055091637,0.0000030927026,0.000042801214,0.00036117388,0.13102326,0.0000828908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5527282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9058046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35307643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034529573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032143024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165253649","doi":"10.7202/042523ar","title":"The Meaning and Implications of « Unlawfull » in Canada's Abortion Law","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.01095517750921776,"score_gpt":0.25194369119436727,"score_spread":0.2409885136851495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165253649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9189798,0.008251424,0.000038838414,0.0485933,0.00014435807,0.00018442681,0.000021759204,0.0000095090845,0.023776546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99410754,0.0022632382,0.00036811572,0.00044483738,0.00012283026,0.000015831336,0.0000016993409,0.000005974382,0.0026699083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989678,0.0001224503,0.0002368886,0.000140919,0.00018522097,0.0003467232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992906,0.00034695724,0.00011908789,0.00009169057,0.000066413806,0.000085263164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033392754,0.00009110296,0.00014306232,0.000010105374,0.0008821084,0.00003167291,0.00015516042,0.00011110065,0.000017160706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001064925,0.000078205274,0.000034708202,0.00022832635,0.0012336139,0.00011835982,0.000026893431,0.00024528964,0.0000022858799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003944042,0.000011929972,0.010650679,0.000013858344,0.000029552713,9.013627e-7,0.024336597,0.00016241848,0.00010954245,0.90138084,0.00046501184,0.06283475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041958247,0.000027226166,0.3894061,0.000104235354,0.00008611742,0.000004424914,0.07894873,0.00053592544,0.0004094478,0.03330201,0.49640286,0.00035331852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.967249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99821293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8680788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003661814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021169263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9575516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165483064","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwv015","title":"<i>Trinity Western University v Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Political science; Charter; Nova scotia; Jurisdiction; Constitutional court; Conscience; Sociology","score_opus":0.04513203442762357,"score_gpt":0.2976174407610646,"score_spread":0.252485406333441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165483064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9283946,0.0012570303,0.00013343181,0.0058798045,0.00072203466,0.00009640672,0.0000026678656,0.00001721053,0.06349682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949565,0.0031001882,0.00036810097,0.0004759628,0.00030945684,2.9879118e-8,4.0632204e-7,0.0000038328694,0.00078555004],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999136,0.00010587114,0.0001665868,0.000084003645,0.00033306613,0.00017452547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917614,0.000053816875,0.00019593471,0.000045281617,0.00029067954,0.00023811759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058628933,0.00008161983,0.00018299319,0.000014659408,0.00038306013,0.00005582665,0.00014402467,0.00009473608,0.000004993666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004407178,0.000060924474,0.00012707019,0.000089728324,0.00037075244,0.00034083734,0.00006128078,0.00018154099,0.0000045735337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001013564,0.00046447548,0.3543868,0.00015248354,0.00088718184,0.0003686611,0.3198134,0.000071944356,0.0009600225,0.13875142,0.17840192,0.0047281166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009400213,0.00014608192,0.0030307483,0.00005673191,0.000059254213,0.000018421253,0.0087655755,0.0000013242806,0.000055244578,0.0006477936,0.9861522,0.00012662463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006584545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044453735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8077503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015575514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000081265905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168600337","doi":"10.1177/0002764210368096","title":"In the Name of Equality? The Missing Intersection in Canadian Feminists’ Legal Mobilization Against Multiculturalism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Behavioral Scientist","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Political science; Intersectionality; Law; Gender studies; Arbitration; Context (archaeology); Ethnic group; Economic Justice; Harassment; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.03400761167663148,"score_gpt":0.37136114749734805,"score_spread":0.3373535358207166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168600337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98721766,0.00001939695,0.0000019979257,0.008340073,0.00076374324,0.00045094584,0.00001334905,0.000015079202,0.0031777231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990381,0.000010768084,0.00012148983,0.00040485314,0.000092932896,0.000038839164,0.00001062335,0.0000057307543,0.00027667196],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800587,0.00040503734,0.00032284477,0.00026027445,0.000499251,0.00050675176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992526,0.00010756114,0.00019551179,0.00019266533,0.00012445278,0.00012716636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014950588,0.00012814967,0.00018435741,0.000089389636,0.00088045606,0.00022981105,0.00053106324,0.00006176101,0.000048788817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029927772,0.0000768707,0.00007468713,0.0012398083,0.0025332817,0.0003852148,0.00004722936,0.00035890305,0.000007766747],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018567314,0.00043567992,0.3647162,0.000011917151,0.000010693797,0.0000392963,0.55847454,0.000051530515,0.0180941,0.012825487,0.0017847958,0.0435372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031766863,0.00006451597,0.6726551,0.000037443435,0.000023813907,0.0000041937383,0.22776566,0.00015975621,0.00025833474,0.000045447854,0.09834003,0.00032801807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9648959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9861495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33070886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048636732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017599529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9333982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169696031","doi":"10.7202/039648ar","title":"The Roots of Canadian Law in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Legal history; Comparative law; Political science; Common law; Israeli law; Public law; Context (archaeology); Legal profession; Black letter law; Chinese law; Sociology; Sources of law; Private law; History","score_opus":0.021031489416687355,"score_gpt":0.2617595878260023,"score_spread":0.24072809840931492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169696031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24460733,0.0001173831,3.5435335e-8,0.013458924,0.0013885178,0.000105403946,0.000023479493,0.0000043364244,0.7402946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999289,0.000090822716,0.000045237444,0.00025978594,0.00015268812,0.000001960825,1.8682707e-7,0.000003840427,0.00015651638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988858,0.00009901678,0.0001993088,0.000065181135,0.000351286,0.00039937196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993075,0.00013676228,0.00008676269,0.00006826292,0.00013902778,0.0002616976],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005977286,0.00006330312,0.00010922179,0.000023070403,0.0063809743,0.00004611625,0.00030327187,0.000045325673,0.00011512656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017570295,0.000039889,0.000038041973,0.00020085515,0.00031472655,0.00011075116,0.000020785768,0.00042717272,0.000003954658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003322809,0.000005808155,0.006354169,0.0000014022689,0.000019922552,0.000031103944,0.0010541149,0.000010729782,0.00008263498,0.9882954,0.0015518798,0.0025895613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093172166,0.0000041367407,0.019133074,0.000006399842,0.0000030995536,0.000003991538,0.0039574476,0.000001845281,0.000089071604,0.0004971091,0.97615016,0.000060489023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9877982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068890874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002932609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99491256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170502526","doi":"10.1093/icon/moi004","title":"Canada: Supreme Court addresses gay-positive readers in public schools","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Gay rights; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.046754422815522216,"score_gpt":0.3251092374183937,"score_spread":0.2783548146028715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170502526","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21476464,0.0019507102,0.0021288681,0.54936016,0.008207152,0.0006378772,0.00050177105,0.00005640484,0.2223924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968046,0.0001499459,0.000691333,0.0015613218,0.0006738174,0.000004315102,0.00001091333,0.0000034155964,0.00010035959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975185,0.00010044755,0.00046520267,0.00012770211,0.0015231778,0.00026497716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975863,0.0002068729,0.00027613694,0.00004384169,0.0017110301,0.00017578487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048606988,0.00011903024,0.00020232814,0.0000991729,0.00034859232,0.00015318753,0.00052591227,0.000071289025,0.0001645584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00102947,0.000103832645,0.00009854925,0.00015079466,0.0014308827,0.00089409767,0.000052130414,0.0003428372,0.000012624581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041437084,0.00007751697,0.0040966826,0.0000015218892,0.00017911216,0.0002393805,0.0009148071,0.00079478475,0.000051957242,0.9907901,0.002675205,0.00013743754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003436589,0.00006645813,0.036573768,0.0005926964,0.000043319542,0.00024808187,0.0118022775,0.0000048564902,0.0006636608,0.028356576,0.91772497,0.00048675004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5399717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7634246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9624336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028173807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006018916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171778160","doi":"10.5539/ach.v2n1p71","title":"Culture, Government and Development in South Korea","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Culture and History","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Principal (computer security); Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.01753483815476341,"score_gpt":0.24180623221508338,"score_spread":0.22427139406031996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171778160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29650065,0.012804659,0.000007718437,0.0020820817,0.0011886794,0.00068970904,0.000013869039,0.00012631126,0.6865863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96686906,0.00029062462,0.0019047726,0.00033750446,0.00021667672,0.000029535133,0.0000033963872,0.0000075498265,0.030340906],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990621,0.00003785386,0.0001328396,0.00023261456,0.00030500008,0.00022959674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997056,0.000009224294,0.000056697652,0.000062048406,0.000032188233,0.00013423999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001872679,0.00012861863,0.00015201031,0.000012364877,0.00046084027,0.000031653206,0.00008939339,0.00015054361,0.00007960752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007270039,0.00009515116,0.000021816584,0.00004442658,0.00038789332,0.00013090494,0.000050625014,0.00026615683,0.0000152509465],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008279075,0.000039778442,0.014556663,0.000017616976,0.000022296848,0.000008600297,0.93860143,2.7408785e-8,0.00070958957,0.011608714,0.020246528,0.01418046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021079535,0.0000106532525,0.042310778,0.000010966533,0.000006666984,7.9202545e-7,0.03905029,1.7687226e-7,0.000029329734,0.000041042287,0.9181763,0.00015222383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007490331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02804316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89955115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041374718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060337225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9896925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173772894","doi":"","title":"Bringing Meaning to First Nations Consultation in the British Columbia Salmon Aquaculture Industry","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Law; Context (archaeology); Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Government (linguistics); Seriousness; Aquaculture; Supreme court; Sociology; Political science; History; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Archaeology; Ecology","score_opus":0.033863107061648266,"score_gpt":0.3246822346768829,"score_spread":0.29081912761523465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173772894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94666183,0.0032191244,0.0000095020605,0.0286468,0.00036822676,0.00040328942,0.000009025761,0.00003364557,0.020648526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99499595,0.0009313635,0.0007789068,0.0006305893,0.0007603498,0.000018042012,7.508581e-7,0.0000096656695,0.0018743708],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791086,0.00022850932,0.0005499338,0.00015631279,0.00079594675,0.000358441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979981,0.0008093407,0.0003304507,0.00006317436,0.00070609985,0.00009280363],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014171344,0.00012131336,0.00033745044,0.00006231509,0.0042295316,0.0011505418,0.0003663161,0.00012840226,0.000028208095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005350038,0.000113590395,0.000108631466,0.0008296115,0.00025022263,0.0006931122,0.00008411982,0.00067968486,0.000009135012],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030984593,0.000281846,0.074101284,0.000060122125,0.00049940386,0.00021503586,0.78880805,0.002494089,0.000090152746,0.0029122084,0.11665967,0.013847181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008028942,0.0001074162,0.10153335,0.0006139741,0.000088508255,0.00006536641,0.3220128,0.000012618277,0.000010563232,0.00019583463,0.5742596,0.00029704836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048224367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87114567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8229213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049043796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008135246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177207741","doi":"","title":"Les aménagements consensuels que les couples appliquent à leur rupture sont-ils d'essence contractuelle?","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Toulouse Capitole Publications (University Toulouse 1 Capitole)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.03620319501603901,"score_gpt":0.28309090891488825,"score_spread":0.24688771389884923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177207741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7861729,0.02420858,0.0023284033,0.15061153,0.0017573533,0.0035278704,0.0008577127,0.0017246571,0.028810985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88173664,0.01561687,0.0023055284,0.0011382039,0.00096514483,0.000044556455,0.00020467087,0.0000949215,0.09789344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915152,0.0011490739,0.0009921736,0.0018381001,0.0016082621,0.002897189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933664,0.0007964091,0.0011093561,0.0013721441,0.0018543006,0.0015013766],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013316664,0.0012134237,0.0013318845,0.00053929625,0.0068140035,0.0008771219,0.0023577185,0.0013278231,0.0020335892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072755764,0.0013944191,0.0007263012,0.002265564,0.0032221896,0.0024018274,0.0005068151,0.0015147135,0.00089945126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019261522,0.002764487,0.007053739,0.00028286912,0.0011517528,0.00026264985,0.08154281,0.00084793376,0.001313009,0.5918364,0.25480625,0.057945464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002111608,0.00018039577,0.033551693,0.00027814024,0.0007086956,0.000032965178,0.11263547,0.0005644779,0.00019062085,0.0020398116,0.84580404,0.0019020628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066057876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027034352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5909978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00343802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008464936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177371912","doi":"10.18224/educ.v18i1.4268","title":"MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION IN CANADA AND THE CASE OF THE PORTUGUESE AND BRAZILIAN COMMUNITIES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Portuguese; Multiculturalism; Scholarship; Christian ministry; Library science; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Diversity (politics); Gender studies; Social science; Political science; Pedagogy; Anthropology; Law","score_opus":0.025800624813341305,"score_gpt":0.2694191812309472,"score_spread":0.2436185564176059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177371912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95741427,0.0015704177,0.000001814327,0.024869088,0.00045694702,0.00047745637,0.000013290795,0.000023196064,0.015173497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989417,0.00027058602,0.0001805724,0.0001979327,0.0001279015,0.000069898655,0.0000075193966,0.0000074401173,0.00019644915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997967,0.00083232915,0.00034295963,0.0001767869,0.00039261745,0.00028832382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985809,0.00039675971,0.00021402801,0.00021458631,0.00038439714,0.00020934263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000713195,0.00016653974,0.00025048005,0.000047757356,0.0008992674,0.00007775645,0.0003060596,0.00011231959,0.000003782279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095264975,0.00009829234,0.00005037111,0.00029308908,0.00020521732,0.00026457937,0.00021896481,0.00031700768,2.3382121e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116143194,0.0001267496,0.014893152,0.000046366113,0.0000653848,0.000056283683,0.14671533,0.00002736199,0.00003449143,0.8310968,0.00080023834,0.0060216966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002541804,0.000021659878,0.15490821,0.00016525383,0.00008187343,0.0011343115,0.44394565,0.00035046533,0.00006155712,0.0007987453,0.39557752,0.00041295442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35583293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9809594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83029807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002058563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6916529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177674306","doi":"10.7202/1068942ar","title":"LE MARIAGE POLYGAME ET LE DROIT INTERNATIONAL PRIVÉ QUÉBÉCOIS DANS UNE PERSPECTIVE DE DROIT COMPARÉ","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021864869775289668,"score_gpt":0.2876897324820975,"score_spread":0.26582486270680783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177674306","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1451243,0.001693424,0.006721389,0.4521031,0.0031588306,0.00079216016,0.0007979631,0.0003295656,0.38927925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731109,0.0012242665,0.0022052426,0.0061142137,0.0033983972,0.00011552533,0.00020613043,0.0000944587,0.013530847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952683,0.00042421656,0.0009333734,0.0011222427,0.0012148815,0.001037023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99698216,0.00049746345,0.0006413165,0.00031305754,0.0008634273,0.00070255564],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074535183,0.0005751879,0.00075949635,0.00014910017,0.00073583017,0.00043575556,0.00200291,0.00042817835,0.00086120225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014754535,0.0007719196,0.0006948853,0.00071164605,0.001157431,0.0011213571,0.00044156934,0.0010712574,0.00046799477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014513693,0.0006075633,0.0044218516,0.000055687506,0.0009824751,0.00017897639,0.10210844,0.0008385441,0.00071952795,0.88474196,0.0035189246,0.0016808875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032415912,0.0002560736,0.05612065,0.0005052061,0.00030606438,0.0001911471,0.1159905,0.018254383,0.0003855007,0.109032586,0.69391966,0.0017966563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5755037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37453464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8279866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067187212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025358452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178083431","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwv043","title":"<i>Mouvement laïque québécois v Saguenay (City)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Tribunal; Conscience; Charter; Political science; Human rights; Neutrality; Duty; Constitution; Statutory law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03963257883280171,"score_gpt":0.2987751175640989,"score_spread":0.2591425387312972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178083431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5556248,0.14295329,0.00012116192,0.098068275,0.006964468,0.00031999455,0.00000770268,0.000022800903,0.19591753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9065885,0.078988105,0.0005689966,0.002316125,0.0019635826,0.0000021704004,9.4565286e-7,0.000014702366,0.0095568895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979587,0.00024141966,0.0005692485,0.00015986076,0.000678469,0.000392258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982995,0.00009914395,0.00050728617,0.00008299677,0.00052233064,0.00048877136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001035287,0.00020766092,0.0004208703,0.00003443523,0.0005299236,0.00010896305,0.00020304338,0.00021358178,0.000024485249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011360192,0.00014637539,0.00019676509,0.0001754229,0.0007697002,0.00048719428,0.00009047222,0.0003635223,0.000011644998],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003665192,0.0006014451,0.009606715,0.00019864376,0.0007090145,0.0002929284,0.12613633,0.00011746995,0.00036177842,0.66479397,0.17534526,0.021469926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008577782,0.00048564665,0.0002531464,0.00026661158,0.00014166287,0.000060420334,0.0049658846,0.0000054396537,0.00016655825,0.007613311,0.98498124,0.00020231343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.071869224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025345812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.809636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037948927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018827732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180101268","doi":"","title":"They are Agreements Nonetheless, Case Comment on Miglin v. Miglin, 2003 SCC 24","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Certainty; Test (biology); Context (archaeology); Autonomy; Meaning (existential); Child support; Political science; Balancing test; Wife; Psychology","score_opus":0.02671061214872403,"score_gpt":0.30435490995860603,"score_spread":0.277644297809882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180101268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91288805,0.014303157,0.00030692288,0.039462447,0.0029012577,0.0014242271,0.000027679986,0.00015989524,0.028526362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840065,0.0077344156,0.00013566698,0.0014896431,0.0004993281,0.000020385698,0.0000022032466,0.000025968688,0.0060858894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946664,0.00083706726,0.000405077,0.0003162769,0.0008195172,0.0029556926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987164,0.00012408507,0.00034877815,0.00018581189,0.00037900158,0.00024592446],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031694141,0.00029231672,0.00033456326,0.00006498129,0.0026502756,0.00016123807,0.0003633431,0.0001569407,0.00019501899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071052474,0.00022419966,0.00016813357,0.00032250147,0.00019801765,0.00021107381,0.00004104895,0.0018954067,0.00019401473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025596502,0.0019660788,0.036975108,0.00003795606,0.0022722655,0.0012050624,0.06504185,0.00027435258,0.00016139586,0.79545134,0.06873639,0.027622228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028302444,0.00063838984,0.0006816389,0.0001373296,0.00017194868,0.0005311705,0.23998512,0.000018240218,0.00020529128,0.050503027,0.70333385,0.00096372515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006139695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07472396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7449483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003225126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010993966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99864817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180803877","doi":"10.29173/alr285","title":"Personal Stare Decisis, HIV Non-Disclosure, and the Decision in Mabior","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Point (geometry); Sexual assault; Criminal law; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics","score_opus":0.038995556658975375,"score_gpt":0.33670745195185725,"score_spread":0.2977118952928819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180803877","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13282837,0.6278806,0.000010318776,0.103279375,0.0005079281,0.003250041,0.000013705739,0.0000355478,0.13219412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8702509,0.12205826,0.0004182403,0.0045780856,0.00020261924,0.00013912168,0.000006707851,0.00001523898,0.0023308338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830925,0.00034137166,0.00031295943,0.000249749,0.00049945636,0.00028719218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827385,0.0012042618,0.00009190991,0.00015194969,0.00012612359,0.00015189988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014603169,0.0001486009,0.00043312166,0.0000096105805,0.00041940899,0.000079262616,0.00027589768,0.00006570568,0.00013338754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021114566,0.00007855209,0.00010806989,0.00026026534,0.00063684216,0.00020954935,0.00013561679,0.000144064,0.00016839258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028052393,0.00022057172,0.06348774,0.0009983781,0.00021294884,0.000027857326,0.16907099,0.0000016885994,0.0000019139993,0.4033342,0.23620784,0.12615535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009831346,0.000013231779,0.0034334362,0.0013650068,0.00006038767,0.0000024170688,0.0029396813,0.000010672781,4.5247188e-7,0.0012382763,0.98978,0.00017326507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06551772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16923106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7535722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012374087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056357076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94070506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181142208","doi":"","title":"La contractualisation du mariage: réflexions sur les fonctions du \"Code civil du Québec\" dans la familie","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Droit prospectif: Revue de la recherche juridique","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.07575588040631019,"score_gpt":0.32643920898978956,"score_spread":0.25068332858347936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181142208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36454487,0.004918178,0.004238373,0.28930905,0.0010370008,0.001814261,0.00015297721,0.0008134796,0.33317178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9657359,0.013064633,0.0028552117,0.0009226714,0.002498442,0.0003042141,0.00003316795,0.00008425715,0.014501495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98827654,0.008400776,0.0008764378,0.0009279392,0.0005120337,0.0010062552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870876,0.010853402,0.0005083354,0.00048474307,0.0006495444,0.00041637663],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0091772955,0.0006641285,0.0008291088,0.000103037935,0.0018832274,0.0005118277,0.0006921535,0.0023360339,0.0005141391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018248206,0.0006969556,0.0005531853,0.0010344094,0.0019163097,0.0009048958,0.0001421933,0.0030055996,0.00013509375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120849014,0.0015049863,0.024254555,0.00019474213,0.00035990975,0.00020754542,0.18368427,0.000170233,0.0041461634,0.75093454,0.011218099,0.02320408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015807536,0.0002579236,0.18897349,0.00048372493,0.00054973055,0.0003829301,0.02576069,0.0008003629,0.0012348401,0.07107211,0.7074784,0.0014250341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15410648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36326998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69626033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008636154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024094477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181419258","doi":"","title":"THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF NORTH VANCOUVER BYLAW 7217 A bylaw to amend the District of North Vancouver Zoning Bylaw, 1965 (Bylaw 3210) pursuant to section 903 of the Local Government Act (RSBC 1996, c.323) (Text Amendment - definition of dwelling unit)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Zoning; Corporation; Government (linguistics); Section (typography); Public administration; Local government; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.028642223814799295,"score_gpt":0.2561527571228544,"score_spread":0.2275105333080551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181419258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98479176,0.00008999468,0.0036507642,0.0006287065,0.0011639803,0.0018919348,0.00021286086,0.000025849946,0.007544169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982947,0.00029194987,0.00026944565,0.00012116715,0.00012668692,0.000085906395,0.000011092277,0.000023561965,0.0007754523],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946458,0.00056830014,0.0013050167,0.0004395138,0.0024826548,0.000558749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961312,0.00078635185,0.0017155677,0.0006498627,0.00058226014,0.0001347931],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010247156,0.00039126287,0.0006160455,0.000041868458,0.0014172421,0.000052087405,0.00096106937,0.00011793965,0.000054001568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038324873,0.000193952,0.00043475878,0.0017990655,0.0012749749,0.00029097925,0.00041701074,0.00031796002,0.0000027934518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019430678,0.0025858057,0.74595284,0.00046276,0.0016757976,0.0000050129456,0.05789803,0.041192017,0.0048855604,0.06056733,0.021223733,0.061608024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018927017,0.0013811379,0.8664077,0.00052882184,0.00073884754,0.00000192884,0.045162432,0.0010975935,0.019980628,0.00085648714,0.060994193,0.00095752557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035603683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4894011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45379743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084435573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017765531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184817944","doi":"10.1016/s1701-2163(16)35266-5","title":"Elective Caesarean Section for the Mature Nullipara?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Caesarean section; Section (typography); Elective caesarean section; Obstetrics; Gynecology; General surgery; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.021269637142155594,"score_gpt":0.26556625768777564,"score_spread":0.24429662054562004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184817944","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048988853,0.04822187,0.000054425374,0.8294069,0.1128988,0.0009937421,0.00013231368,0.000011624091,0.003381448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5729641,0.005233334,0.0004596547,0.38253868,0.022699319,0.000088065,0.00004114137,0.00009086351,0.015884863],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832696,0.00019518414,0.00033299506,0.00013370068,0.0005183933,0.0004927643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990059,0.008277023,0.00070230017,0.00007568088,0.0007834414,0.00010255372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052147836,0.00018588304,0.00041288443,0.000079487814,0.0012270736,0.00007224795,0.00029875748,0.00068480946,0.0001352944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005380652,0.000114094415,0.00013682092,0.00026310774,0.0002119223,0.000107189204,0.000035106103,0.001685692,3.6113653e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015824478,0.000006694254,0.0016146507,0.00002328668,0.00023739338,0.000103076396,0.0017766439,0.0000038634025,2.1424816e-7,0.00006961584,0.9891579,0.0070050717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028194673,0.00006605008,0.02023683,0.0000032241285,0.00022378589,0.000008333187,0.0021058582,0.0000020195705,8.350893e-7,0.0001163854,0.9768134,0.00014132852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20202947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41544467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56806517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030948096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013504094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9437782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184855128","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1435","title":"Reflections on the Twentieth Anniversary of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: a Symposium","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.047955632946409796,"score_gpt":0.2918563974828959,"score_spread":0.24390076453648607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184855128","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038372178,0.00035351113,0.0000012968976,0.03295563,0.00050472544,0.00019000613,0.000015378044,0.000007302429,0.92759997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99768853,0.00014861765,0.000038664974,0.00024043133,0.00017064002,0.0000020496273,1.1205389e-7,0.0000035909904,0.0017073582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989676,0.00023030111,0.0001557972,0.00008483795,0.00034064706,0.00022082194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993922,0.00009098865,0.00014919686,0.00010229139,0.00014395379,0.00012137349],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031509998,0.00007749853,0.000119392505,0.000024132874,0.0034316722,0.00006171285,0.00024739336,0.00006572199,0.00029033338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040464376,0.000038850772,0.000097397635,0.00013824466,0.00088437943,0.00013003108,0.00002733198,0.00027380773,0.000006067694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009207029,0.000079920996,0.0015230639,0.0000072218486,0.00018923468,0.000006593737,0.091960564,0.000018613822,0.00061084883,0.8874499,0.017988794,0.00015598412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026259809,0.0007128157,0.04757056,0.0008612443,0.0005893032,0.00012078475,0.072605915,0.0002217368,0.002642475,0.16820793,0.70275533,0.0010858999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8481441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9828904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016193622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033923705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99786574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184953878","doi":"10.22215/etd/2000-04590","title":"The many meanings of mediation; a sociological study of mediation in Canada.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative mediation; Mediation; Party-directed mediation; Conciliation; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Transformative learning; Epistemology; Alternative dispute resolution; Social science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.022480221560921713,"score_gpt":0.31313934177456065,"score_spread":0.29065912021363893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184953878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9785001,0.0003342295,1.14485985e-7,0.000647332,0.00032769155,0.0007129176,0.000006893437,0.00001198349,0.019458728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962482,0.0007226403,0.000011173711,0.000019106154,0.00009737142,0.0000692706,0.000048616814,0.0000059141275,0.0027777443],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997634,0.0003719599,0.0005814764,0.0001921794,0.000987019,0.00023335525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834776,0.0008042776,0.00045671884,0.00008986132,0.0002590397,0.000042333882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006712206,0.00014228007,0.0003774463,0.000033162214,0.00040976817,0.000013891541,0.00032534535,0.00017990347,0.00024227987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090385403,0.00008630185,0.000055611195,0.00026057847,0.00012318659,0.00006653746,0.000017027685,0.00022069564,0.0000022465238],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021717622,0.00035300292,0.1342824,0.000066136265,0.0002808372,0.0000039479523,0.84197026,0.00007515223,0.00006567401,0.006207332,0.0047932523,0.011684801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023853494,0.000043262633,0.49167144,0.000012655824,0.000023088598,1.05005835e-8,0.50673264,0.000013147955,0.000018956893,0.0002575056,0.0008844696,0.000104283055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9726125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35738903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007395564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009492042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35192874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2186105750","doi":"10.4000/revdh.1481","title":"L’interprétation harmonieuse de la charte québécoise et du code civil du Québec : un sujet de discorde pour le tribunal des droits de la personne et les tribunaux de droit commun ?","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue des droits de l’homme","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Hôtel-Dieu de Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.03733881900205871,"score_gpt":0.3051268356421939,"score_spread":0.2677880166401352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2186105750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9049331,0.010094486,0.008949993,0.06371064,0.00021452366,0.00061078736,0.0002907624,0.0003133488,0.010882359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98145545,0.0067917984,0.0068400353,0.0014269961,0.00071402075,0.00019230682,0.00006668327,0.00014313479,0.0023695645],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99002695,0.0059376378,0.00080707436,0.0007000876,0.0005545251,0.0019736993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99379987,0.0035932974,0.00054473453,0.00044185735,0.0005149419,0.0011052748],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065895654,0.00075391465,0.0009819772,0.00013395245,0.0019914745,0.0007809198,0.0011259974,0.0007701646,0.00014396274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00617424,0.00082602847,0.00055283384,0.0006464557,0.0031255728,0.0010754004,0.00038345612,0.0014133404,0.000090842106],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000472737,0.0019999188,0.12582445,0.00055377674,0.0007325957,0.0007542482,0.59662235,0.0015187504,0.0029488418,0.24470666,0.010503101,0.013362575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01190426,0.0013205381,0.2462556,0.004417959,0.0021491968,0.0045144917,0.21503766,0.0523151,0.0038394392,0.23265512,0.22067548,0.004915147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4360162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38890588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38158467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066417283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035028642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187801251","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1452","title":"The Empire of the Lone Mother: Parental Rights, Child Welfare Law, and State Restructuring","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Supreme court; State of exception; Welfare state; Politics; Citizenship; Political science","score_opus":0.01345010629204034,"score_gpt":0.26666975772709073,"score_spread":0.2532196514350504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187801251","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47694188,0.0026796337,0.0000026634439,0.021152722,0.0006144615,0.00027657353,0.000015820386,0.00003357492,0.49828267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99793345,0.0011619191,0.000059225396,0.00013195343,0.0002868853,0.0000026102364,3.4308033e-7,0.000009394816,0.00041424605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984026,0.00027813637,0.00027102407,0.0001390592,0.0005303016,0.00037889782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932444,0.00008019172,0.00023776025,0.0001379263,0.000097557706,0.00012212974],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004497487,0.0001368493,0.00016983431,0.000007790933,0.010576077,0.0002378789,0.0004074205,0.00006011581,0.00006663359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045893907,0.00006528364,0.00011287879,0.00009750932,0.0012082894,0.00022926186,0.00012297046,0.00037683095,0.000002596212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006744022,0.000061318024,0.02507927,0.000012240988,0.0002106868,0.00002904038,0.022810651,0.0000485393,0.00005807029,0.94663554,0.00031597598,0.004671237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016979456,0.00009304912,0.20801216,0.00027296518,0.00010504888,0.0003094801,0.024639737,0.00001849958,0.0006445088,0.088712014,0.67496854,0.0005260336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.121821076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6337676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8579235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000104793144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012495835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99071205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W218798039","doi":"","title":"Les Trente Premières Années De La Charte Canadienne En Droit De La Famille (The First 30 Years of the Canadian Charter in Family Law)","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Spouse; Charter; Family law; Ethnology; French; Marriage law; Sociology; Jurisprudence; Law; Art","score_opus":0.010092879570029387,"score_gpt":0.25197959812156406,"score_spread":0.24188671855153468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W218798039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95826715,0.018943008,0.0000026334658,0.010373015,0.00041351706,0.00020717668,0.000019733054,0.0000075480266,0.01176623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884315,0.0080982335,0.000008006471,0.00028655294,0.00067137036,0.000015005139,7.283035e-7,0.000020598887,0.002467968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99444,0.001251899,0.00029827934,0.00015145162,0.0003110941,0.0035472547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988538,0.0004513199,0.00019209427,0.00013982615,0.000060646707,0.0003023157],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004884754,0.00020049035,0.00025667896,0.000052401363,0.0016167065,0.0000960974,0.0006600075,0.00027749722,0.000059619688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020403175,0.00014371425,0.00019513856,0.00031537376,0.0014613542,0.0002368427,0.000060173286,0.002124237,0.00001460404],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013696545,0.00011071483,0.16597931,0.00002264205,0.00035933623,0.000008743155,0.17425674,0.00007885621,0.00014203077,0.6338405,0.00073997467,0.024447454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003959486,0.000053547818,0.6075675,0.00013190106,0.000089829395,0.00006879565,0.044261858,0.000031114498,0.000020329342,0.01106316,0.33609194,0.00022405993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95254457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62277734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008899755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002651643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W219044165","doi":"","title":"The Windsor Report and Ecumenical Dialogue","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Prayer; Baptism; Sociology; Eucharist; Law; Common ground; Theology; Religious studies; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.046166345065645716,"score_gpt":0.35998941963346487,"score_spread":0.31382307456781916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W219044165","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056509443,0.39967626,0.000015502712,0.35535997,0.0002200144,0.0015782977,0.0000047066396,0.00026531558,0.18637049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65327275,0.33364448,0.0002832248,0.0067187184,0.0005949097,0.00010670293,0.0000029680416,0.0000061257565,0.0053701224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982578,0.0004939172,0.00032123967,0.00026013394,0.00029576774,0.0003711258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985065,0.0009186291,0.00013092745,0.00019729872,0.000083191364,0.000163468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019917148,0.00012365537,0.00030512706,0.0000043571445,0.0010965999,0.000055400138,0.0002992411,0.000083944054,0.00032313887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056813904,0.000057904443,0.00012600084,0.00015234844,0.0014459105,0.00008771546,0.00015950992,0.00018847328,0.00009718002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013829333,0.0000746127,0.0053108186,0.00006737868,0.000072601746,0.00008924228,0.001853319,1.7421922e-7,0.000011826939,0.5702212,0.046746798,0.37553823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056075296,0.000026207803,0.009353109,0.00008722219,0.0000320285,0.000017243347,0.00025446818,8.05503e-7,0.0000019901415,0.0027653072,0.9872983,0.00010722497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026842102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008860781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9405515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006350658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029506447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84342706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2191619616","doi":"10.1515/9781773855714-065","title":"7.4 Re Constitution of Canada, 1981: The Patriation Reference","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.04183571701639508,"score_gpt":0.23355973715111192,"score_spread":0.19172402013471684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2191619616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007117017,0.0006262266,0.000018979992,0.00027101955,0.00021931888,0.00033011468,0.00008848725,0.000025441655,0.99834925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037933387,0.00041227348,0.000050344985,0.00001843509,0.000062125284,2.571631e-7,0.000013376922,0.0000050453873,0.96150476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899536,0.000051705734,0.00014841213,0.00017476511,0.000496375,0.00013336753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918246,0.00013160614,0.00023991943,0.00014305966,0.00025116175,0.00005176895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017404316,0.00012536567,0.00023327743,0.000024253855,0.00049900904,0.000010939359,0.0003073027,0.00020240861,0.00009038367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034162036,0.000104301915,0.00009670429,0.000008484167,0.0009853549,0.00004301939,0.0001422667,0.00024373672,0.0000024623462],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022092694,0.00000173576,0.0000031629866,0.000060938353,0.00011059998,0.000010066217,0.0068125036,0.0000031820155,0.000006809927,0.98812604,0.0035461476,0.001296742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009777694,0.0000128123365,0.000050607403,0.0001747373,0.00017836865,1.2738707e-7,0.0019845658,0.00001074265,0.000027085125,0.002113931,0.9952251,0.00012414779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84921134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9076003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99167895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032647996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061735354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42533088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2194368223","doi":"","title":"The Legal Status of Aboriginal Customary Adoption Across Canada: Comparisons, Contrasts and Convergences","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Statute; Mainstream; Openness to experience; Common law; Political science; Law; Statutory interpretation; Business; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.009950373810732082,"score_gpt":0.31443381041637575,"score_spread":0.30448343660564364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2194368223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9795532,0.016484031,0.00024356434,0.0016837581,0.0006469681,0.00014777148,0.0000075219714,0.000013212211,0.00121998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97032285,0.028734025,0.00003393081,0.000034981545,0.00028618216,0.0000016404332,9.065522e-7,0.000004929576,0.000580552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99612397,0.00014988873,0.00032850937,0.00012214751,0.0006010363,0.0026744285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998984,0.0002869985,0.00025892112,0.000053983826,0.00023784644,0.00017829068],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030683465,0.0001167826,0.00019095266,0.0000102073045,0.0022973113,0.00008473051,0.00021167962,0.0000591018,0.000009033967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015576453,0.00007691805,0.00005018888,0.00015753804,0.0006160292,0.00021532275,0.00002214717,0.000841816,0.0000011957097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003926216,0.0000710484,0.32771844,0.0000131857,0.00054297136,0.000015250167,0.015675351,0.000019312904,0.00022233308,0.5550976,0.0033841773,0.09684774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065929885,0.00013842153,0.2289423,0.000017640552,0.000040438037,0.000034921854,0.23777495,0.000015726459,0.000070931266,0.0017096828,0.53038174,0.00021398265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8264952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9938884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5533879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001993834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004298545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2195831491","doi":"","title":"Equality's Nemesis?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Judaism; Law; Multiculturalism; Islam; State (computer science); Jurisdiction; Gender equality; Sociology; Gender studies; History","score_opus":0.018416918188181038,"score_gpt":0.31010250471822415,"score_spread":0.2916855865300431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2195831491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77990025,0.009104889,0.0016796819,0.025279611,0.0008564463,0.0003352771,0.0000025580912,0.00022552205,0.18261576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97488695,0.0022672596,0.000087014,0.00011118547,0.0016838808,0.0000045573897,0.0000012249991,0.000009946519,0.02094799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620575,0.0002687825,0.00024792991,0.00014896481,0.00059316156,0.0025354342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994656,0.00008174996,0.00013946347,0.00007414875,0.00016007473,0.000078955476],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027230189,0.00012045124,0.00016231646,0.00003459024,0.0016560128,0.00013559623,0.00029460932,0.00008429718,0.00011385696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018064363,0.00009608726,0.00014404833,0.00021474104,0.00020689651,0.00027216272,0.00003316261,0.0010997282,0.00011232828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009712871,0.000051800744,0.0038607873,0.0000017390116,0.00006926212,0.0000020024977,0.0028673192,0.000010660235,0.000089966816,0.98035115,0.002437176,0.010248404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007154609,0.00011100447,0.016967887,0.000015238938,0.00005950514,0.000027776854,0.06632338,0.0000054737643,0.000049973354,0.56445605,0.35082597,0.0004422781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021867622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07093661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4158951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019184835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010524223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W219669053","doi":"","title":"Eagle soaring on the emergent winds of indigenous legal authority","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Law; Environmental ethics; Economic Justice; Indigenous rights; Political science; Colonialism; Sociology; Order (exchange); Human rights; Law and economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.052145942076425984,"score_gpt":0.2883170905806425,"score_spread":0.2361711485042165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W219669053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88266605,0.00970309,0.00014694409,0.02982439,0.0035999247,0.0014971002,0.00004868437,0.00009213569,0.07242167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873333,0.0023767333,0.00034338704,0.00017932501,0.00093379605,0.000101405916,0.000005324997,0.00001338187,0.008713366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997318,0.00041730146,0.0006312426,0.00042455786,0.0005297917,0.0006790762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982416,0.0005080496,0.00035566706,0.000332918,0.0003722518,0.00018950924],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000692354,0.0003418467,0.00048338997,0.000052493426,0.0025560192,0.00015386753,0.0005862447,0.00027119447,0.0018636045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006531473,0.00025190393,0.00032683002,0.00052618067,0.0036943334,0.0004645617,0.00020884484,0.0004705807,0.000862438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008056282,0.00034081005,0.004786754,0.00013030552,0.00027792488,0.0000073398796,0.02884124,0.00063397083,0.0002715354,0.95606875,0.0025099807,0.006123337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008132182,0.00038467822,0.035098594,0.0016759452,0.00047208366,0.00002333751,0.100316234,0.0006374083,0.0017030033,0.007212606,0.85025555,0.0014073659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029138504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003056668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9488561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049694715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031375847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201471634","doi":"","title":"Book Review of Robert Post, et al 'Prejudicial Appearances: The Logic of American Antidiscrimination Law'","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Scholarship; Law; Constitutional law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.014494216401388758,"score_gpt":0.3225856280090041,"score_spread":0.30809141160761533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201471634","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023863485,0.6618561,0.000534764,0.30278605,0.00022761975,0.0006417839,0.000006887051,0.00003213629,0.010051186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5910844,0.39253908,0.000054446886,0.016040651,0.00009851592,0.0000045800816,0.0000015193208,0.0000063525254,0.00017041272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770296,0.00034968407,0.00036130013,0.0001246966,0.00058955024,0.0008717929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896157,0.000071627,0.00051149685,0.00008928139,0.00032473853,0.000041309097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023468682,0.00011285523,0.00030879446,0.00002227077,0.00053560414,0.000018762788,0.0003460784,0.000029358544,0.000038856328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031734462,0.00006897849,0.0001869995,0.00026351848,0.0008817318,0.00024945257,0.000035682733,0.0006677687,0.00000490591],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046061952,0.00014507514,0.00015819268,0.00012314063,0.0002206574,0.000001320484,0.010439091,0.000041209572,0.0005446638,0.97309494,0.0045924988,0.010593146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019811958,0.0022265967,0.0066678305,0.004792306,0.0004727899,0.00008401292,0.0781217,0.0000042465317,0.00075315346,0.1512426,0.75285286,0.000800718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01675396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016393896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8218523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058913615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009805049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98979354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203824065","doi":"","title":"Indigenous peoples: Negotiating constitutional reconciliation and legitimacy in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Indigenous; Political science; Law; Negotiation; Duty; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04505518199907934,"score_gpt":0.283898263497561,"score_spread":0.23884308149848163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203824065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5396748,0.24375828,0.000045731897,0.003387681,0.0012381652,0.0036751325,0.00009714744,0.00014603998,0.20797698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9625173,0.035408884,0.00037742904,0.0013582513,0.00009992087,0.0000832925,0.000012016378,0.000006089595,0.00013682486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983864,0.00021806553,0.00039235762,0.0002538665,0.0003712077,0.00037810983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992909,0.00016838436,0.0001732191,0.00010112411,0.0001388951,0.00012747986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005523462,0.00014811967,0.0003286976,0.000016827415,0.00075246487,0.00003970769,0.00015731897,0.00005298313,0.00022125345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050651224,0.00012883062,0.000040328723,0.00020103883,0.0005070226,0.00034610843,0.000052205003,0.00015487417,0.000019521449],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013053829,0.00009020323,0.1870768,0.0011096903,0.00008897377,0.0000589569,0.10702469,0.000014876523,0.000009623778,0.67772907,0.008551635,0.018232444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075755396,0.000037207392,0.064503,0.0021907762,0.000094751005,0.000012563001,0.024045039,0.00005604943,0.000019148427,0.0006985887,0.9066984,0.0008869117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9856058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9924946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89814675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009708979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013322509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57874274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203871222","doi":"","title":"One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Gladue at Ten and in the Courts of Appeal","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Seriousness; Jurisprudence; Appeal; Law; Contempt; Political science; Imprisonment; Remorse; Economic Justice; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01494542493726116,"score_gpt":0.2912098980369692,"score_spread":0.27626447309970803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203871222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9712676,0.0056342836,0.00007053654,0.014324491,0.00006940247,0.0003143629,0.000002084141,0.00001119582,0.008306091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99257475,0.005820144,0.000082625294,0.00019173634,0.00026674327,0.000002394251,7.740458e-7,0.0000050470926,0.0010557851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973251,0.00031277214,0.00027125963,0.00014421267,0.00053195073,0.001414677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994714,0.00011809462,0.00017353166,0.00008321266,0.000085624546,0.0000680942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025898782,0.000116401985,0.00023419812,0.000037976846,0.0006668554,0.00005489063,0.00031192592,0.000065990695,0.000027565771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011041031,0.0000776891,0.0000817856,0.00017758668,0.0002267848,0.0001834831,0.000038360977,0.00081917044,0.000010933709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006320194,0.00079600455,0.09463083,0.000034864737,0.00067747163,0.000021007836,0.121347025,0.00007852102,0.001717725,0.5293962,0.0029836837,0.24768464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008078188,0.002001282,0.398435,0.00023861768,0.00028765426,0.00022069472,0.21996047,0.00011165008,0.00018002217,0.32604495,0.043316375,0.001125105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022958163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058184844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30380416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009651866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037166092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9590008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2206309149","doi":"","title":"Adding Social Condition to the Canadian Human Rights Act","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Charter; Political science; Disadvantage; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Cultural rights; Social equality; Social rights; Politics; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.017705740660332023,"score_gpt":0.3214602232510862,"score_spread":0.30375448259075416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2206309149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7218441,0.0006406321,0.00005774586,0.14886509,0.0005885716,0.0006380262,0.000009465243,0.000100133875,0.12725624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99506116,0.000049648537,0.000012277874,0.00057794014,0.0019274032,0.0000043375817,0.0000032141404,0.0000049473424,0.0023590697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690694,0.00020196981,0.0001597564,0.00013096048,0.00042472448,0.0021756382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995027,0.00002965289,0.00008676678,0.000052142157,0.00012950873,0.00019918934],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015542662,0.00011166053,0.00012563185,0.000058599104,0.015739562,0.0002469057,0.00036275023,0.00009062852,0.000112446956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007623758,0.00007410436,0.00010473788,0.00023412835,0.00011116021,0.0002148623,0.000011208723,0.0010971603,0.000089602014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005286562,0.000013925091,0.0002295825,3.10003e-7,0.00006677231,0.0000031271945,0.020148955,0.0000051559787,0.00006386358,0.9649529,0.0065680803,0.007942058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035477759,0.00020711507,0.029315554,0.000014279941,0.00004890364,0.000017832868,0.017163364,0.0000016772952,0.000024302997,0.23040009,0.72212815,0.00032392814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3225359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9902245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7345528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005382684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010440353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209263739","doi":"","title":"Introduction: Sexual Assault in Canada: Law, Legal Practice and Women's Activism Ottawa","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sexual assault; Criminology; Law reform; Legal practice; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.00928521447640944,"score_gpt":0.26954985699903505,"score_spread":0.2602646425226256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209263739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.936626,0.0033865122,0.00002547322,0.051109582,0.0009349522,0.00017141555,0.0000014031826,0.000024067862,0.007720577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921421,0.0012217277,0.000056252073,0.00038001526,0.0034586242,0.0000126302075,6.540732e-7,0.000011115527,0.0027168947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955099,0.00050367526,0.00024303977,0.00018502718,0.000669266,0.002889099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991659,0.00019333948,0.00018329242,0.00007413655,0.00015304956,0.00023028009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004488666,0.00015070803,0.00021158165,0.00003400168,0.0009880348,0.00010603115,0.0001623953,0.00008636913,0.00006785284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083017105,0.00012818062,0.00002310846,0.00022375594,0.00017256117,0.0016720406,0.000043427997,0.0019911942,0.000008895313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012466124,0.00022080223,0.024850843,0.000010848814,0.0004439693,0.00001746946,0.05140628,0.000020754125,0.00020261675,0.8881395,0.0062369793,0.02832529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043574692,0.000083796585,0.008564574,0.000003543652,0.000025043279,0.00017214712,0.31322536,0.000002126673,0.000011770739,0.0019145622,0.67532855,0.00023277034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9900961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8862249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013537969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004931583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99024886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2213666015","doi":"10.1017/s0008197315000471","title":"“THE CHOICE IS CRUEL”: ASSISTED SUICIDE AND CHARTER RIGHTS IN CANADA","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science","score_opus":0.053430002113746246,"score_gpt":0.3076852628311166,"score_spread":0.2542552607173703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2213666015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8845828,0.0020585556,0.0000011429606,0.06250445,0.0009418184,0.00020211078,0.0000076771075,0.000013068238,0.049688354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958303,0.00013230303,0.000011425252,0.0012976885,0.00057964365,0.000005380477,3.2127653e-7,0.000004640818,0.0021382968],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825937,0.00038065392,0.0002328387,0.00011014548,0.0005820886,0.00043492756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990059,0.00034845245,0.00012775224,0.00010679268,0.00017095532,0.00024011095],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011316567,0.00011139047,0.00015786165,0.000008959689,0.002953515,0.0002579431,0.00034363,0.00003845426,0.000015910091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017267963,0.000053985677,0.000039192517,0.00013239216,0.00043540465,0.00019630593,0.0000618313,0.00037841848,0.000011516802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014988416,0.00007002682,0.11285429,0.000013013274,0.0003808101,0.00026467195,0.06360819,0.000013916972,0.000108683074,0.11791739,0.69074064,0.013878458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044361156,0.00001359783,0.1665825,0.000022764003,0.000018436333,0.000033458706,0.008626424,0.000020255764,0.000030393763,0.0003336432,0.8237451,0.00012984843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9889892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99814945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13300441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090492726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034884762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215096919","doi":"","title":"The Relevance of Relevance to Equality Rights","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Argument (complex analysis); Legislature; Statute; Allocative efficiency; Law and economics; Jurisprudence; Political science; Statutory law; Legislation; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.014965449909921614,"score_gpt":0.3081549449228731,"score_spread":0.2931894950129515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215096919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90966773,0.017899545,0.0019402134,0.029253958,0.0008839663,0.0005932299,0.0000050307985,0.00009259398,0.039663747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981769,0.004137931,0.00016292777,0.000052182793,0.00064947887,0.0000074763243,3.173049e-7,0.0000070913843,0.013213577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965702,0.00031959233,0.00037317432,0.00016474098,0.0006411012,0.0019311341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876696,0.00048135154,0.00024966808,0.00014119141,0.00028451002,0.00007630433],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003328072,0.00011908541,0.00018563318,0.000019928679,0.002419246,0.00007092144,0.000492787,0.0000634417,0.000010961704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007400177,0.00007252591,0.00012287182,0.00030572875,0.00033725373,0.00018319886,0.000045236255,0.00082725385,0.00003584795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003824483,0.0000329324,0.0009142717,0.0000022816926,0.00004867235,6.6400594e-7,0.0023590073,0.00004277769,0.0002999205,0.9867857,0.0015486969,0.007926842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023261142,0.0000996965,0.003653523,0.000021773143,0.000017308,0.0000053252197,0.00560242,0.0000030705742,0.00026881768,0.5613615,0.4285672,0.00016674878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01403229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1649874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4270185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013991287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006114053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215275648","doi":"","title":"Magie, Contes Et Sortilèges - Le Droit À L'Écoute De L'Enfant (Magic, Spells and Tales - The Right to Hear from the Child)","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"MAGIC (telescope); Autonomy; Representation (politics); Humanities; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Art; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.011234768825875662,"score_gpt":0.27677171034094533,"score_spread":0.2655369415150697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215275648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51218295,0.23237766,0.0002602233,0.24849913,0.0007550813,0.00039022966,0.000037490583,0.00001953066,0.0054777307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.925886,0.054917477,0.00014493406,0.0027250662,0.0026676778,0.0000042457755,0.0000019951672,0.000026663185,0.013625979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943542,0.0009911712,0.00038925142,0.00026936215,0.000559229,0.0034368266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983393,0.0007819816,0.00026534867,0.0001961188,0.00010510539,0.00031217712],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004327274,0.00032890472,0.00037076275,0.000022166554,0.0020218708,0.00038167465,0.00064549106,0.00014622569,0.00023304166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035912692,0.00018131861,0.00023481224,0.00024345487,0.0011536977,0.00066006486,0.00018785043,0.0022287308,0.00037149445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059561815,0.00020041072,0.032074075,0.0000072653024,0.0010102899,0.000005088919,0.068253234,0.000024982528,0.0004119966,0.8824362,0.008508002,0.007008862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083716586,0.0002413387,0.12801631,0.00018038615,0.00042566052,0.00022710593,0.11429711,0.000039864717,0.00028778435,0.16621232,0.588576,0.00065896177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036592145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07896899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7162239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011556263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009425401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215380626","doi":"","title":"Kapp Gives Affirmative Action Wide Margins","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Supreme court; Charter; Government (linguistics); Fishing; Political science; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Action (physics); Business; Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.03203046212272898,"score_gpt":0.31157309211852646,"score_spread":0.2795426299957975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215380626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96361285,0.0030891942,0.0011010048,0.015602636,0.0005524934,0.00025608635,0.0000018633243,0.00011364919,0.015670229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96478015,0.023281954,0.00009487471,0.000108685745,0.0006941873,0.0000073480833,0.0000010729184,0.000010528876,0.011021192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969549,0.00028091806,0.00020267302,0.00015316889,0.00050139526,0.0019069151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934864,0.00013419623,0.00017525749,0.00006457135,0.00015991916,0.000117394346],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096764957,0.0001399558,0.00018258167,0.00004964161,0.002878296,0.000054491604,0.00024572056,0.000089263034,0.00008620262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036070068,0.00011144859,0.00013728901,0.00023674816,0.00037560312,0.0005584169,0.00003244473,0.0012745231,0.00015899337],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026076712,0.00048990466,0.069273494,0.000020666756,0.0016531551,0.00006247205,0.403605,0.00015337118,0.0016403765,0.45030645,0.020057252,0.0524771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014890375,0.00039610942,0.09152308,0.00004351307,0.00009039329,0.0002817119,0.40581888,0.000021226468,0.0003043696,0.08627546,0.4129642,0.00079203834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020141872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015700154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39290693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026403316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013525393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2219596490","doi":"","title":"Should Australia enter into the Anglican communion covenant?: Reflections to assist consideration within the Anglican Church of Australia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"St. Mark's Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bishops; Covenant; Consecration; Windsor; Law; Eucharist; Commission; Theology; History; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2064120776751366,"score_gpt":0.4601322354243249,"score_spread":0.2537201577491883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2219596490","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40661776,0.05634479,0.00015893765,0.47156334,0.0043230266,0.012178149,0.00019566731,0.00033921414,0.048279125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889295,0.004012429,0.0004490893,0.0018889011,0.00034202955,0.00022389881,0.000016448732,0.000012391438,0.004125293],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967378,0.0015634373,0.00052131084,0.00019746888,0.00055943045,0.0004205449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984353,0.00036561384,0.00030840983,0.00045570594,0.00027450456,0.00016043868],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030543255,0.00020770496,0.00040136193,0.000026091699,0.001660732,0.000099641664,0.0004898917,0.00009553688,0.00078234065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010854934,0.0001088604,0.00018977231,0.0006356814,0.0007302047,0.00025082045,0.00016920245,0.00038634578,0.00007816515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005684227,0.00043813602,0.046444077,0.0012635534,0.0005851349,0.000003988631,0.19239017,0.000010932838,0.0023414306,0.077400126,0.6668311,0.012234504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117201205,0.000062098756,0.049785692,0.0008212988,0.00020218725,0.0000045647043,0.008598607,7.017842e-7,0.00017124832,0.00027790427,0.9397123,0.00024618377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022920592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031614065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58231175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027753413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050735667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W221999019","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Realism About Constitutional Protection: Indigenous Rights Under a Judicialized and a Politicized Constitution","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Politics; Constitution; Political science; Jurisdiction; Law; Realism; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Indigenous rights; Human rights; Shadow (psychology); Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Sociology; Political economy; Geography","score_opus":0.016896738508027365,"score_gpt":0.2865102730648243,"score_spread":0.26961353455679693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W221999019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65001655,0.020155758,0.069676094,0.018064514,0.0028488406,0.003783641,0.00011693962,0.0006490967,0.23468855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958842,0.0011109924,0.00016410828,0.00015407943,0.0014779652,0.000045333352,0.00001571343,0.0000042885604,0.0011433308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99602145,0.00035693904,0.0004649306,0.00030822118,0.0007344668,0.0021140107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989653,0.000103848244,0.00027122124,0.000079401005,0.00040774836,0.00017245625],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016082976,0.00024223563,0.00032725243,0.00009310315,0.0056229103,0.0002185922,0.0001714431,0.00022207916,0.00008407283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001732976,0.00020305549,0.00013833368,0.00027556915,0.008155922,0.0004394017,0.000036037974,0.0011517731,0.00003058084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000612485,0.00006911551,0.0004689205,0.0000037231603,0.00014152711,0.0000087006265,0.0010575462,0.000050449173,0.00007566526,0.99743325,0.00009801324,0.0005318311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023539069,0.00008920475,0.0017974438,0.000058597496,0.0001105823,0.0006106308,0.003991175,0.000010380998,0.000025226926,0.8995652,0.091001205,0.0003864299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047450844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03039616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34586763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032745989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055540456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99567163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220234893","doi":"","title":"The B:C: Health Services and Support Decision-The Constitutionalization of a Right to Bargain Collectively in Canada: Where Did It Come From and Where Will It Lead?.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.02759220643750637,"score_gpt":0.35200784229778487,"score_spread":0.3244156358602785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220234893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7360832,0.0073460257,0.000064995795,0.24904029,0.00015902426,0.00077085744,0.00025954394,0.000009665848,0.0062663704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99159914,0.0020415792,0.00016357108,0.0057979547,0.00017235392,0.0000069532193,0.0000020381567,0.0000031650775,0.00021324446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980569,0.0005081097,0.0004334231,0.00017111546,0.000493808,0.00033664802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811465,0.0008881568,0.00027976558,0.00007614027,0.00042725544,0.00021403904],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005705994,0.00014843942,0.0003616173,0.000033414584,0.0026053116,0.00018924338,0.0002613942,0.000040941417,0.000048910148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012447828,0.000087578934,0.000027927419,0.00050391606,0.00062097504,0.00028312983,0.000052665328,0.0002180952,0.0000015115769],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004221665,0.00011812904,0.071723334,0.000025838906,0.00025026203,0.000023456043,0.29491445,0.00039534597,0.00013299854,0.5514114,0.07892899,0.0016536325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010685805,0.00017971877,0.37590444,0.00036951213,0.00001859132,0.000012940481,0.05315844,0.0000931827,0.00003718371,0.015039741,0.55387527,0.00024240557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79308766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53637165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009345691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020250566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99869317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220663304","doi":"","title":"(Mis)Placed Justice: Justice, Care and Reforming the ‘Best-Interests-of-the-Child’ Principle in Canadian Child Custody and Access Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Legalism (Western philosophy); Family law; Best interests; Objectivity (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Subjectivity; Political science","score_opus":0.011842202406651054,"score_gpt":0.3080139409486175,"score_spread":0.29617173854196643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220663304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9292852,0.015301157,0.000003352492,0.00866735,0.00031378644,0.00042485422,0.0000069034263,0.000012440094,0.045984916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964594,0.0025017422,0.0000104437895,0.00014858393,0.00038805732,0.000006797014,0.0000010201957,0.000011730467,0.00047220435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736255,0.00019023151,0.00027783884,0.0001898609,0.0003227665,0.0016567275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935484,0.00009252574,0.0001797619,0.000114890056,0.00012324599,0.00013472087],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010598967,0.00015885686,0.00019398607,0.000053712072,0.0032256884,0.00017393022,0.0004766247,0.000105058134,0.0000062429094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023662028,0.00009464746,0.00006292474,0.00026345407,0.0004610663,0.00033068444,0.000088988796,0.0013519845,0.0000013048332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058570677,0.00005678433,0.08546565,0.00014494959,0.00015125958,0.0000111130275,0.039740004,0.00018616003,0.000035500685,0.86503386,0.00012132156,0.008994823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00316448,0.00033305198,0.16512384,0.0008071971,0.0011807214,0.00039504014,0.6122226,0.00012930385,0.00015744995,0.016306806,0.19907008,0.0011094051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64477336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.991921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84872705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018975022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010448343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99807197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2221207432","doi":"","title":"The Fetishism of Formal Law and the Fate of Constitutional Patriotism in Communities of Comfort: A Canadian Perspective","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Politics; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Patriotism; Ideology; Democracy; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010504829812757563,"score_gpt":0.26785567966148577,"score_spread":0.2573508498487282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2221207432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90627134,0.018653372,0.000049538623,0.020748246,0.000116756775,0.0004664418,0.000023405122,0.000005553853,0.05366535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918182,0.007988862,0.0000115041785,0.000076679054,0.00003224007,0.0000015766648,4.038461e-7,0.0000013848094,0.000069146525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984296,0.000282762,0.0002514788,0.00003953374,0.0002537459,0.00074287114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922127,0.0002807179,0.00019623993,0.000055111075,0.0002041622,0.00004247744],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023678206,0.0000662481,0.00018835747,0.000033219552,0.0012508667,0.000023479875,0.00025697006,0.00004537843,0.0000058471055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012177681,0.000037409623,0.000071647366,0.00011902457,0.0040003574,0.00016314218,0.000022735197,0.0006644567,1.6177867e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042060463,0.000010437082,0.0017210349,0.0000010249912,0.000054150554,2.8563392e-7,0.03677586,0.00001326806,0.0000050972285,0.9606831,0.000007377757,0.000686322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014030077,0.00016381658,0.019187875,0.000045010485,0.000032472326,0.000023079418,0.47092733,0.000017551127,0.000016916925,0.5064789,0.0016186878,0.00008535001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6616806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96775603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45420417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078569964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001652278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99871016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2223919524","doi":"10.32597/dmin/73/","title":"Developing and Implementing a Framework to Address Theological Fragmentation at Bethel Seventh-day Adventist Church in Toronto","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gospel; Theology; Seventh day adventist; Faith; Christian ministry; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03923875637816529,"score_gpt":0.3998714355613911,"score_spread":0.36063267918322583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2223919524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.928231,0.001029378,0.00014928434,0.0011047448,0.0005702246,0.0015354886,0.000009519338,0.00007950975,0.06729086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9351425,0.001069187,0.009292671,0.00038122453,0.00032465713,0.0006441601,0.00026739738,0.000028805785,0.052849405],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975271,0.00032803154,0.00046491376,0.00050694647,0.0005415621,0.0006314388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898326,0.00042203243,0.00020879688,0.00009748931,0.00015598156,0.00013241719],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008856357,0.00027969413,0.00038777114,0.00004242481,0.0011431657,0.00017483124,0.00024849034,0.0004229528,0.005871766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006340381,0.00022775233,0.000075315475,0.00017469077,0.00007911728,0.00028663286,0.00019715559,0.00023892087,0.000059568436],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093210736,0.00011424112,0.05506352,0.00032665327,0.0002695617,0.000011546677,0.6441522,0.0000042215925,0.0009943012,0.2311771,0.006155351,0.061638076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003060755,0.000039723276,0.6292452,0.000527539,0.000041802217,2.5418632e-7,0.34788477,0.0000063304797,0.00025168923,0.0021930842,0.018802071,0.00070140813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.083674625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46426198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57418174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019008977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006282874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2227791887","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1448","title":"Book Review: Indigenous Difference and the Constitution of Canada, by Patrick Macklem","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Indigenous; Political science; Law; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.013604364801770331,"score_gpt":0.2411782373089223,"score_spread":0.22757387250715197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2227791887","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018689791,0.7595707,0.00002498074,0.02137112,0.0002591075,0.00046577235,0.000027897071,0.000013749333,0.21639769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81168526,0.18139084,0.00003120513,0.0037505706,0.00010576543,0.000005858855,6.96114e-7,0.000002999942,0.0030268088],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853814,0.00029740203,0.00027609133,0.00009997865,0.0005053542,0.0002830308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992353,0.00016682476,0.00024688727,0.00006993561,0.00015080122,0.00013030205],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005119671,0.00010056856,0.0002505306,0.000006576518,0.002118257,0.00005698368,0.00020958795,0.000045748206,0.0004793582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020347667,0.000058454618,0.00005791699,0.0000821342,0.0009456362,0.00011938117,0.000035799327,0.00024278315,0.000003073294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023038676,0.000072002586,0.0019037842,0.00014270018,0.000156595,0.000027581244,0.018146193,0.0000027821955,0.00004457889,0.14528994,0.8254821,0.008708706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010310413,0.000037019385,0.0011900921,0.00036568116,0.00012271343,0.00005187342,0.0018404042,0.000013748495,0.00004802513,0.0014569432,0.99360627,0.00023619375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87024665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8940884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8098163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001959002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095972624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99918085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2227803424","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Affirmative Consent in Canadian Sexual Assault Law: Neoliberal Sexual Subjects and Risky Women","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Akron law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medicine","score_opus":0.06517423869699798,"score_gpt":0.32904369513481146,"score_spread":0.26386945643781345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2227803424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8884375,0.048623,2.5002433e-7,0.012417621,0.00019865192,0.001116797,0.000021476066,0.000081253755,0.04910344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96969336,0.021519331,0.00011517344,0.006997341,0.00013145273,0.000086776614,0.000008211641,0.000013220069,0.0014351263],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734217,0.0007000338,0.0003542667,0.0003333553,0.00044805644,0.000822143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988836,0.00029402797,0.00013033666,0.00013845472,0.00011710204,0.000436503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013469341,0.00021292598,0.00052100257,0.000025825408,0.001251473,0.000055566103,0.00019399576,0.00014514184,0.00013497382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041179615,0.00017868236,0.000036113837,0.00027426746,0.001018948,0.00032979395,0.000072419,0.00036838552,0.00006540022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020154488,0.0001108303,0.019237852,0.0020124458,0.00019194905,0.00039476503,0.7037853,0.000004578004,0.000027576187,0.24453753,0.019132832,0.010544205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053049996,0.00010336003,0.009532233,0.0010039974,0.000038750248,0.000021275298,0.008254323,0.000005167011,0.0000063889283,0.0012982346,0.978619,0.00058680604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9487525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97563475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9594861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010190954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038899452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96254444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229390123","doi":"10.7202/1100416ar","title":"THE RIGHT TO MANAGE EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS: A CANADIAN FIRST NATIONS PERSPECTIVE","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Political science; Public administration; Computer science","score_opus":0.0235781175789077,"score_gpt":0.3185383233534232,"score_spread":0.2949602057745155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2229390123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018930808,0.00008675232,0.00003425904,0.3445396,0.001327512,0.00043428034,0.000116128525,0.00010075513,0.6344299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611396,0.00045146066,0.00020923071,0.0007404582,0.001104156,0.00034744435,0.000045287965,0.000009845022,0.035952475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988092,0.00005205558,0.00017226474,0.00022722376,0.00036121946,0.0003779932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841833,0.00064628944,0.000053837568,0.00012159907,0.00049776933,0.0002621715],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038712597,0.00009493399,0.000082647544,0.0002586277,0.003869399,0.0002243017,0.0005739895,0.000059900096,0.00034982568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003595758,0.00008728545,0.000092484486,0.0008315442,0.00022348038,0.0002017777,0.000051301668,0.00013045224,0.0011383111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029460816,0.00001792721,0.00084699196,0.000002657375,0.00006260433,0.000008585986,0.022390485,0.00023007621,0.0000025302486,0.9619342,0.014263747,0.00023722419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006878289,0.000004967833,0.046192,0.000037869664,0.00000953909,0.0000042767447,0.008015154,0.00010525508,0.0000013774711,0.022337355,0.9231017,0.00012168294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61646545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9422088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00473248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009424555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230851777","doi":"","title":"Same-Sex Marriage in Canada: The Missing Debate about the Best Interests of Children","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Best interests; Parliament; Family law; Political science; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.015264024578930458,"score_gpt":0.28619721058328257,"score_spread":0.2709331860043521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230851777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98090976,0.0061685583,0.00006599674,0.009760678,0.00020299217,0.00020650502,0.0000016233,0.0000060341026,0.00267784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961919,0.0024916034,0.00001242432,0.00020637977,0.00034695028,0.0000016271115,4.1021295e-7,0.000008141676,0.00074052205],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705285,0.00026721248,0.00034463333,0.00011644761,0.00048447156,0.001734375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992226,0.00030090852,0.00022250484,0.00010545299,0.00007938083,0.00006915046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003991022,0.00011881538,0.00017652859,0.000027870468,0.0010424305,0.00005774509,0.000591833,0.000048158352,0.000024630666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036701173,0.000062218816,0.00007944681,0.0002520675,0.0002846852,0.00010707534,0.000058835187,0.0013566376,0.0000030718538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009391231,0.00009934848,0.58758736,0.00000767019,0.0005856021,0.00002128368,0.061906602,0.00008218073,0.0003169452,0.055397436,0.0007690819,0.2931326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008982387,0.000113401926,0.65846044,0.00013716547,0.00008522104,0.000106152846,0.30697802,0.000021051275,0.00031608288,0.0255973,0.0068896716,0.0003972604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94732124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99850905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29273534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037349605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00385294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97667915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2231645727","doi":"","title":"La Protection Constitutionnelle De La Pluralité Juridique: Le Cas De 'L'Adoption Coutumière' Autochtone au Québec (Constitutional Protection of Legal Plurality: The Case of Aboriginal 'Customary Adoption' in Québec)","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.016249604514355056,"score_gpt":0.2992783153374138,"score_spread":0.28302871082305875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2231645727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9488802,0.0062826173,0.015355741,0.024590587,0.00039590892,0.0010103853,0.000018166153,0.000047747955,0.0034186349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926725,0.004801015,0.00015311036,0.000033076845,0.00064354495,0.000122058584,0.000002689853,0.000015807107,0.0015561708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941251,0.00248885,0.00087595073,0.0003218311,0.0005066438,0.0016816225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981216,0.00032318995,0.00078104646,0.00015780344,0.0004657401,0.0001506084],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070664566,0.00033429606,0.0004477144,0.00015524497,0.002030365,0.000088933455,0.00028339366,0.0004538055,0.00004976393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005228468,0.00027706442,0.00030328665,0.00082381733,0.0059252656,0.0008915704,0.000045357978,0.0029539366,0.000007304217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044805423,0.0005849156,0.00918361,0.00011655531,0.00034823647,0.00024109385,0.018253308,0.0060757026,0.0013806147,0.94603986,0.000041939256,0.017286131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011886424,0.0024070838,0.09567262,0.0021876532,0.001584874,0.14699283,0.30388385,0.00861467,0.0020351245,0.08243796,0.3396346,0.0026623134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9517401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.921852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86360186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02029606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05928287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232551521","doi":"","title":"The Separation of Church and Date: Destabilizing Traditional Religion-Based Legal Norms on Sexuality","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Homosexuality; Sexual orientation; Principal (computer security); Economic Justice; Political science; Lesbian; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.041262571169334974,"score_gpt":0.3189040255911061,"score_spread":0.27764145442177113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2232551521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9188152,0.00041901413,0.000035643676,0.0036858635,0.00028211458,0.00039877777,0.000023109209,0.000055432316,0.07628487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982245,0.000087001834,0.00034761752,0.00034643186,0.00013668962,0.000030447474,0.000010337835,0.000006557612,0.00081042206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982996,0.00041065883,0.00025546816,0.00023076076,0.00053860614,0.00026488016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987689,0.0007066492,0.00011628665,0.00015037837,0.00013861814,0.000119118966],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011767228,0.000120621626,0.00015708094,0.000012890247,0.0017752209,0.00014031857,0.00013990431,0.000086504515,0.00007349675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008548531,0.00008143951,0.000057639234,0.00016929177,0.0006839127,0.00027138033,0.000014677674,0.00019503788,0.000020713846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058342284,0.00013018162,0.010180226,0.000025672556,0.000035426594,0.0000018141375,0.0026762309,0.00015333519,0.0012937714,0.9805925,0.0043463833,0.00050609943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015411547,0.0003242787,0.0905291,0.00009466435,0.00005728414,0.0000020377402,0.009171536,0.00013301837,0.0065111695,0.011551566,0.87943226,0.00065191544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004371941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008428997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96904093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013318958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012534532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232803041","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2686329","title":"No to Rawlsian Public Reason and Yes to the Enlarged Mentality: An Affirmative Role for Moral and Religious Arguments in Canadian Public Discourse in Light of Charter Values","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public reason; Charter; Political science; Law; Public discourse; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02522894134180369,"score_gpt":0.30157200532990996,"score_spread":0.27634306398810626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2232803041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96894467,0.0011307211,0.0000071759523,0.02780981,0.00007912566,0.00071258534,0.000012725699,0.000006891458,0.0012963152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985254,0.00083098875,0.00008021844,0.00017890516,0.00009786899,0.00005099392,0.000002573786,0.000009212175,0.00022384667],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973758,0.00029966116,0.00024491717,0.000199063,0.00024247522,0.0016380876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992966,0.000030702096,0.00009777104,0.00008532927,0.000113029775,0.00037658578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002527463,0.00013212473,0.00021540935,0.00015595318,0.0005543981,0.00013004693,0.00026199207,0.00006277069,0.000010790856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027139857,0.000091159774,0.000036615704,0.00025221676,0.00012492818,0.0005235073,0.000047050395,0.00035985536,0.0000030431236],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014899431,0.00025494274,0.29458565,0.000012140799,0.00022451152,0.0000039142187,0.56651133,7.959573e-7,0.00024871228,0.1152623,0.0005879698,0.022158721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024397657,0.00162308,0.18014702,0.00011715257,0.00006421559,0.000020019012,0.7000233,0.00008580866,0.0002194416,0.07773946,0.036781672,0.0007390496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28303984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96481216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68177235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012311491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075876643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72173446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232811628","doi":"10.71781/21626","title":"Analyse du contrat amoureux au sein du mariage par correspondance : une étude de cas des unions entre Philippines et Canadiens","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.053551924291320066,"score_gpt":0.36041312142226145,"score_spread":0.3068611971309414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2232811628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9616683,0.0011869009,0.0000115302255,0.009452713,0.0012323197,0.0012385058,0.00054141245,0.000008833072,0.024659446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9645927,0.00065516954,0.0009207633,0.00019891882,0.00061725697,0.00010788925,0.000734235,0.000040118106,0.032132927],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99553263,0.0011860182,0.0006609772,0.0008239683,0.0006455654,0.0011508305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966628,0.0006720352,0.00060835213,0.0003212054,0.00097196305,0.0007636645],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018120774,0.0006581604,0.0009755253,0.00008667585,0.0027952665,0.0006183918,0.0012843105,0.0005168568,0.0019872803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024969028,0.0005854,0.00024978444,0.0010354068,0.001157104,0.0007314591,0.00025140677,0.00052731275,0.00028629147],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002906558,0.00028343016,0.09750659,0.000053248084,0.0007646565,0.0003590203,0.873045,0.0007889613,0.0011255012,0.000852727,0.004516598,0.020413589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015230441,0.00019927027,0.37644398,0.0004750526,0.0011338586,0.000013037559,0.3918699,0.0005463124,0.0005457026,0.00047043918,0.2254647,0.001314691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78272957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48117512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028325382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025712014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234284482","doi":"","title":"Constitutional conflicts and aboriginal rights: hunting, fishing and gathering rights in Canada, New Zealand and the United States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"ResearchSpace (University of Auckland)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Jurisdiction; Indigenous; Sovereignty; Doctrine; Fundamental rights; Justiciability; Treaty; Judicial review; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.014823982723765453,"score_gpt":0.28274927934325755,"score_spread":0.2679252966194921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234284482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898231,0.00046385234,0.0000012200899,0.005787887,0.00006589208,0.00029803807,0.000032431057,0.00000973616,0.0035178498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765981,0.003964199,0.00014976582,0.000017029915,0.00007364897,7.3927964e-7,0.00012651738,0.00000431771,0.019065715],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998666,0.00018781409,0.00009256882,0.0002359609,0.0005110188,0.000306641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884814,0.0005786988,0.00013140493,0.00006796877,0.00018018969,0.00019360223],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005287984,0.00013713144,0.00028908424,0.00009422536,0.0013966712,0.00009802986,0.00018460181,0.0001501385,0.00005655808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011495082,0.000107645625,0.000023292669,0.00021569635,0.0017676157,0.00020704034,0.000056647175,0.0005555362,5.451921e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017084122,0.000047033096,0.15908954,0.00044332066,0.00053444726,0.00021070275,0.68423086,0.000037190952,0.000114255105,0.13594292,0.015950084,0.0016912469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026026114,0.000023233177,0.17448778,0.00032793163,0.000055846253,0.000002314068,0.08380858,0.0002251038,0.000011288051,0.0014109946,0.7367631,0.00028119082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99815226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99943906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72081304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019464522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006761559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2235439053","doi":"","title":"In the Back Alleys of Health Care: Abortion, Equality and Community in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Dignity; Constitutionality; Charter; Decriminalization; Health care; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Sociology","score_opus":0.03786929357513867,"score_gpt":0.3291906930467411,"score_spread":0.2913213994716024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2235439053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97777414,0.0015303297,0.0000026817593,0.007742135,0.00011180233,0.00032177445,0.000010954259,0.0000063740817,0.0124998335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974414,0.00016938448,0.00009109984,0.0021613727,0.000045148165,0.0000061637807,0.0000037753766,0.0000031419502,0.00007852272],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970109,0.0017424976,0.00039370506,0.00011108992,0.0003919301,0.000349873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899876,0.00052761735,0.00012913285,0.00016747558,0.00008711084,0.0000899118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044425344,0.00008683487,0.00022602062,0.000013831164,0.00078908796,0.000024118946,0.0002758215,0.000049721784,0.000055785957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035725642,0.00006456386,0.000021144591,0.000289393,0.00029185286,0.00015222738,0.00006215883,0.00045646503,0.000003902833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027443917,0.00014086027,0.5996646,0.00014378825,0.000021541313,0.0000059822905,0.34555,0.000020816185,0.000021690968,0.046457205,0.0058088293,0.0021372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029859488,0.000022419694,0.7221885,0.000028418732,0.0000020416387,1.8211925e-7,0.21674645,4.718516e-7,0.000020433701,0.00040953537,0.060186524,0.00009647406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9994542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99992543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12880355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001031613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004955718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60691065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2235938801","doi":"","title":"Parliamentary Privilege, the Canadian Constitution and the Courts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Privilege (computing); Political science; Legislature; Supreme court; Dignity; Parliament; Charter; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01571575026570412,"score_gpt":0.2595442909476894,"score_spread":0.24382854068198526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2235938801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7618405,0.018904136,0.00007900851,0.1815357,0.0006983631,0.00076152256,0.000004220067,0.000038328788,0.036138166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98097867,0.016786732,0.000008992777,0.0007369585,0.00043075628,0.000008565011,5.6451967e-7,0.0000030690576,0.0010457033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978536,0.00029422392,0.0001298759,0.0000932073,0.00032738713,0.0013017143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995321,0.00013124633,0.00007910809,0.00006297171,0.00008033979,0.00011421926],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002196968,0.00008530482,0.00010679224,0.000018356504,0.008073455,0.000095611766,0.00022879687,0.000049889724,0.000029385783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018197551,0.000041325857,0.000059269267,0.00009098884,0.0022020214,0.00016117905,0.000022887258,0.00095599797,0.000013532422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020819503,0.000008587545,0.012083574,6.690731e-7,0.0001461563,0.0000065820886,0.02081507,0.000006097524,0.0000020992397,0.96035117,0.0029315725,0.0036275787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026467456,0.00010000654,0.03740783,0.00002654259,0.00015397982,0.0008741066,0.13259004,0.000036145513,0.0000079381625,0.19022304,0.6355238,0.00040984363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6324143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9720333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77012813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017987913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034379673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W223843697","doi":"","title":"Equipping the Saints: Ordination in Anglicanism Today. Papers from the Sixth International Anglican Liturgical Consultation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bishops; Baptism; Theology; Liturgy; Eucharist; Context (archaeology); Ecclesiology; Sociology; Divinity; Law; Classics; Philosophy; History; Political science","score_opus":0.03917722114592433,"score_gpt":0.356190711901244,"score_spread":0.3170134907553197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W223843697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.342306,0.05387285,0.000310793,0.33258268,0.0009954406,0.004049873,0.000062150946,0.0003705947,0.2654496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9622467,0.023019953,0.00014937577,0.013465575,0.0005386787,0.00010308625,0.000035548655,0.000008900627,0.00043215542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695516,0.00094979466,0.0005489408,0.0003980522,0.00064304314,0.0005049853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950479,0.0040925187,0.000260666,0.00024068773,0.00023640382,0.000121780206],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003892888,0.00021021481,0.00036245192,0.000023781922,0.00071952504,0.00009441953,0.00087610027,0.0001447912,0.0015051217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009373971,0.00010155443,0.00018820177,0.0006539801,0.0011928201,0.0001589035,0.00019958659,0.00043086286,0.000057458336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007825992,0.00018298729,0.014067811,0.000036589536,0.00014486584,0.000050465962,0.023591645,0.0000042644238,0.00019352284,0.6474403,0.0050722677,0.30913705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050467654,0.000055302913,0.21028462,0.00058715907,0.00006934931,0.000002916634,0.015866589,0.000016404387,0.000015559535,0.008988162,0.7632862,0.0003231034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039512236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059773405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7582139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038454053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050070106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2238561466","doi":"","title":"Civil Law and Religion in the Supreme Court of Canada: What Should We Get Out of Bruker V. Marcovitz?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Precedent; Majority opinion; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.019966193296892615,"score_gpt":0.2822889075886577,"score_spread":0.2623227142917651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2238561466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7340234,0.049631186,0.00003456842,0.20195353,0.000417077,0.00050471636,0.0000047369012,0.000014904777,0.013415908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9570728,0.04170468,0.000011822379,0.00075887784,0.00012538915,0.0000014136799,4.539796e-7,0.0000040022114,0.0003205467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762,0.00026349947,0.00029037616,0.00011592911,0.0006371722,0.0010730511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994319,0.00013904966,0.00017790166,0.00008134229,0.00011629021,0.000053479605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022652382,0.00010798552,0.00022982467,0.000025892188,0.00039135743,0.000053929743,0.00027995554,0.00007338528,0.000009422135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000117740994,0.00006948739,0.00006113941,0.00013845238,0.00022892836,0.0003093237,0.000021419186,0.00077705015,3.6485062e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014048077,0.00017559715,0.0074236332,0.000026481519,0.00019990896,0.000014781478,0.08143458,0.000044224602,0.00093213125,0.88632286,0.009869567,0.013415734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002202794,0.0009019078,0.036928356,0.0004138727,0.00014839639,0.00006831472,0.31104666,0.000031829753,0.00036641094,0.47869465,0.168524,0.00067283044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38835445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98638594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59803146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009315739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015696366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61571854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241646490","doi":"","title":"R. v. Kapp: New Directions for Section 15","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Supreme court; Law; Plaintiff; Charter; Scrutiny; Expansive; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; High Court; Prejudice (legal term); Dignity; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.019504955858555544,"score_gpt":0.31398009446856007,"score_spread":0.2944751386100045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241646490","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3470396,0.051623438,0.10090192,0.37429428,0.011113632,0.0037471117,0.000013232295,0.0014712211,0.109795585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.923322,0.009406673,0.00046383287,0.00027509415,0.0055790595,0.000010390623,0.0000018756473,0.000011378656,0.060929682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771357,0.00008568114,0.00017054389,0.00014264339,0.00026127874,0.0016263067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950635,0.000067231915,0.000105363935,0.000052277173,0.00014031546,0.00012844348],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010475552,0.00010373268,0.00013312406,0.00004321593,0.0021378314,0.00010683587,0.0001606337,0.00009203827,0.000040669387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032101892,0.00008697818,0.00016045242,0.00023467273,0.00005671156,0.00029640278,0.0000074629365,0.0007523859,0.000020590112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010521385,0.00015611884,0.00075956935,0.000003156094,0.00031678824,0.0000010145163,0.018877544,0.000056887005,0.0011160303,0.5317126,0.05110228,0.3957928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056151283,0.00027234212,0.002551099,0.0000092313585,0.00005437264,0.000022931628,0.015054442,0.0000075719977,0.000050881234,0.23465636,0.74656767,0.00019160521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020316076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032761432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6954654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019675686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001352875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99916124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2242895667","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1951913","title":"The Substance and Scope of Aboriginal Rights in Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.014574102379274232,"score_gpt":0.28169079311891093,"score_spread":0.2671166907396367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2242895667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82164216,0.017342128,0.000020439973,0.0024156745,0.00030841143,0.00020741636,0.000004510548,0.000009567073,0.15804972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99214375,0.007323429,0.000037856567,0.000027478722,0.00008715128,0.0000026373862,1.9430556e-7,0.0000014998157,0.00037597676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811924,0.00010783502,0.00015872973,0.00008338188,0.00021083294,0.001319983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959475,0.00005879853,0.00007620749,0.00003981959,0.00010668512,0.00012371237],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014969322,0.000066861554,0.000098345074,0.000026385283,0.0015380668,0.000030569397,0.00018438253,0.000044985944,0.000025461592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035954276,0.000042464722,0.000029131692,0.00012985253,0.0017211225,0.00017652845,0.000004922575,0.00054739293,0.0000043166688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011215928,0.0000067425444,0.009356194,5.93354e-7,0.000023507268,0.0000024759327,0.0039172354,3.5481614e-7,0.0000053809727,0.98633105,0.000022135462,0.00032310892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066414353,0.000097391734,0.031503994,0.000051467465,0.000022762739,0.0000452811,0.0118249105,0.000002320223,0.00008543805,0.57501155,0.38046008,0.00023064479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4113195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012036687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030498903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243195124","doi":"","title":"The Apologia Canadiana lessons for an Indian Boarding School Apologia Americana","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indigenous policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pledge; Redress; Obedience; Government (linguistics); Political science; Sociology; Law; Gender studies; Media studies; History","score_opus":0.0495348030333861,"score_gpt":0.3869202445506811,"score_spread":0.337385441517295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243195124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8405243,0.0009670209,0.0000361283,0.119493894,0.00052038755,0.0023921249,0.0001482064,0.00039655194,0.035521377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929394,0.00036729357,0.00030721686,0.0032233978,0.0015875925,0.00008689328,0.00000973734,0.000015783968,0.0014626614],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973348,0.00023681961,0.0002627601,0.00033330027,0.00031871317,0.0015136575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851525,0.00029427174,0.00017409102,0.00029076563,0.00015298952,0.00057264895],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067841983,0.00022042461,0.00028114053,0.00011242724,0.008366202,0.00029509963,0.00083225797,0.00019083294,0.000013956665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017428059,0.00015807897,0.00013837067,0.0006012053,0.00081103964,0.00023290995,0.000037433438,0.00026773196,0.00004053138],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048280497,0.00014462465,0.00915309,0.000012341122,0.000244575,0.000024884102,0.49735478,0.000048599664,0.00036368895,0.15426737,0.0232294,0.31510836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006712617,0.0009084294,0.2267116,0.000024384932,0.000074708674,0.000007818496,0.19244845,0.000010617376,0.00016817983,0.018235711,0.55962753,0.001111287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7953657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67405486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5363981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016538826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015385216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99292475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245562801","doi":"","title":"Examining Sexual Diversity: Sexual Orientation and Marriage in a Canadian Legal Context","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Human sexuality; Framing (construction); Religious freedom; Opposition (politics); Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Freedom of religion; Gender studies; Law; Psychology; Human rights; Geography","score_opus":0.024801567493390363,"score_gpt":0.2820850223687811,"score_spread":0.2572834548753907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245562801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99217695,0.0009778435,0.000022032325,0.0037333318,0.00013553712,0.00014063502,0.0000020753862,0.000017484635,0.0027941181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99732214,0.00041061512,0.000019999232,0.00028720984,0.00027224596,0.0000013064142,0.0000019113581,0.0000043261466,0.0016802446],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724007,0.00018701653,0.00016362785,0.000194272,0.0003120286,0.0019029896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995145,0.000053649626,0.000078850935,0.000044167296,0.00006851384,0.00024029166],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018064348,0.00011252086,0.00015357391,0.000102378646,0.001767683,0.00013608894,0.00016036126,0.00008608612,0.000025510559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023922927,0.00010524025,0.000017790971,0.0002115794,0.00012297358,0.0005152825,0.000038835227,0.0008498527,0.000006671118],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006634177,0.000052405445,0.4291683,0.0000038508083,0.00011762676,0.00007669183,0.13420165,0.000011422077,0.00015054899,0.17616382,0.00037640653,0.25961092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015538712,0.00069963076,0.30159912,0.00001782679,0.00004348346,0.000062798164,0.6716966,0.000036618785,0.00000435128,0.013655022,0.010222771,0.0004078977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71963763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98314506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53749496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032423004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015786092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246619878","doi":"","title":"Law, Theory and Aboriginal Peoples","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Liberalism; Oppression; Law; Political science; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.014327107353190488,"score_gpt":0.2974042242211967,"score_spread":0.28307711686800624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246619878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5575953,0.0032907543,0.000023644438,0.0014084225,0.00047800905,0.00030067077,0.000009988388,0.00017335797,0.4367198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900204,0.0006416857,0.00073819136,0.0009808278,0.0003000783,0.00002766448,0.0000015664093,0.000012070993,0.007277499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820113,0.00054722046,0.00016423417,0.00028413226,0.00035914514,0.00044415763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990072,0.0004390525,0.00006106402,0.00014122718,0.00009578963,0.0002556196],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010323664,0.00015935836,0.00020762531,0.000012697166,0.0016427091,0.00020181325,0.00017693198,0.00010980367,0.0007953843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005810653,0.00012901684,0.000067398214,0.00014970393,0.0008967852,0.00037197678,0.000030215988,0.00019901134,0.00025037155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009299306,0.000021303293,0.004762044,0.0000095991445,0.000024278052,0.000004475978,0.0072233113,7.387777e-7,0.00008788504,0.98667645,0.001028308,0.0001523274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032482826,0.000024783936,0.0052523236,0.00002332227,0.00002756489,0.0000018635264,0.013423928,2.9174674e-7,0.00024270095,0.02968178,0.95073795,0.00025867083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016233178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055839606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95699465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011688217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009025737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246738569","doi":"","title":"Poverty and a Victorian Bill of Rights: A View from Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Poverty; Government (linguistics); Charter; Human rights; Political science; Bill of rights; Law and economics; Fundamental rights; Rights of Nature; Law; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.006160849017486987,"score_gpt":0.23402596992511732,"score_spread":0.22786512090763034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246738569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9601945,0.021097615,0.00004711892,0.010751655,0.0005104823,0.00019440553,0.000025748137,0.000020289426,0.007158138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99601483,0.0025596619,0.000044667075,0.00009674135,0.0005880925,0.0000017716534,0.0000020966054,0.0000049739633,0.00068715593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980359,0.00012771055,0.00022370856,0.00012570171,0.00040828018,0.0010786831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995177,0.00009019564,0.00015149436,0.000054323376,0.00011196226,0.00007431733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005069207,0.000103161285,0.00020446177,0.000016903457,0.00067196495,0.000037497877,0.00016199413,0.000055187167,0.000051975407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006443681,0.00006267475,0.000050750605,0.0001333128,0.0001133988,0.00013842751,0.000024089813,0.00047660322,0.0000015901261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014959567,0.00029523415,0.14497632,0.000025357205,0.0014717004,0.00003802704,0.02298328,0.000019456125,0.0016516137,0.7851701,0.028788865,0.014430446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073529803,0.00008036676,0.020703038,0.0000444034,0.00007779998,0.000010569139,0.010143595,0.000004230352,0.00009100806,0.41081107,0.55701554,0.00028307887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9934235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99806494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5282267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017470652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002092376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5168279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247011054","doi":"","title":"Legal lawlessness and the rule of law: a critique of Section 25.1 of the Criminal Code","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Lawlessness; Law; Political science; Criminal code; Criminal law; Parliament; Criminal procedure; Public law; Rule of law; Due process; Sources of law; Politics","score_opus":0.05712437520175705,"score_gpt":0.39163827127572975,"score_spread":0.3345138960739727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2247011054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96850735,0.00032394993,0.0000037556963,0.017454661,0.00015326185,0.00051515957,0.00027346183,0.0000048289453,0.012763592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968707,0.0018149723,0.0005584861,0.00030875255,0.00030738304,0.000010907054,0.0000012572494,0.00000957652,0.00011793901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955631,0.00036341223,0.0012245143,0.0006228186,0.0005795239,0.0016466187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99491113,0.0016878756,0.00040223688,0.00042671178,0.0011416846,0.0014303705],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0092767505,0.0002324252,0.0008368219,0.00026354208,0.0010767475,0.00023735389,0.0012336739,0.00017620978,0.00005905916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046775774,0.00015410203,0.00018317364,0.00052415347,0.039682418,0.0011490633,0.00090115465,0.0005691329,0.000001811836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001075679,0.0001319604,0.0055040824,0.00007527921,0.000018446384,1.68533e-7,0.00073970214,0.00003962626,0.00092322985,0.9920511,0.0000105495565,0.0003982588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008088821,0.0015551441,0.4150263,0.0006090858,0.0002860557,0.000047994778,0.040690005,0.016884992,0.06241725,0.4283071,0.024712099,0.0013751447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058847554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008258187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.563744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004779287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021440831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96293104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247480324","doi":"","title":"Crown—First Nations Relationships: A Comparative Analysis of the Tsawwassen Final Agreement and Tsilhqot'in v. British Columbia","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Jurisdiction; Law; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.08702964039289833,"score_gpt":0.3423852135808513,"score_spread":0.25535557318795293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2247480324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8482048,0.00047662837,0.0000017779664,0.0002202851,0.000211911,0.00077157,0.000065169435,0.00001826444,0.15002958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93399954,0.00039559303,0.0001464509,0.00000930964,0.000032742882,0.00010405854,0.00012195965,0.000004242464,0.065186076],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822825,0.0003307389,0.00044463252,0.00029453923,0.0004923857,0.00020943457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985398,0.00051707623,0.0003728091,0.00012980368,0.00038515445,0.000055341654],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046296703,0.00012125025,0.00047019002,0.00011563246,0.0022147272,0.00021873607,0.00025343776,0.00021560483,0.00089419173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006686829,0.00013137728,0.00019933887,0.0016083263,0.00031741356,0.00015473046,0.00004332104,0.00027104403,0.000005281707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010778105,0.00017579657,0.8006169,0.0000615387,0.0013819218,0.0000015549762,0.18603994,0.000033244945,0.0000035257199,0.00750056,0.0039367448,0.00023746109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014734274,0.000008860149,0.9012905,0.00011284908,0.0006439583,6.807893e-8,0.094617605,0.00002772329,0.0000021622068,0.00021805856,0.0027797492,0.00015115629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6759931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32348362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020790592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012518594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247778769","doi":"","title":"Unions de même sexe au Canada et au Royaume-Uni. Variations autour de la notion d’égalité. Réflexions de droit comparé à partir de l’affaire Wilkinson v. Kitzinger (Same-Sex Unions in Canada and the United-Kingdom. Comparative Reflections on Equality in light of Wilkinson v. Kitzinger)","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.03729751485872895,"score_gpt":0.339531321835356,"score_spread":0.30223380697662705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2247778769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9297239,0.0008130865,0.0069623375,0.055837102,0.00046937182,0.0005543373,0.00006196141,0.000027815373,0.005550062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996495,0.0011963983,0.00030548134,0.0008949605,0.0003862321,0.00003583388,0.000018417275,0.000032145916,0.0006355343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883816,0.0055135014,0.0010864665,0.0004216022,0.00079068844,0.0038061019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950707,0.003208236,0.00071726093,0.00025275024,0.00026727785,0.00048379353],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012276845,0.00044935456,0.0007469437,0.0002942176,0.0028163274,0.00013324832,0.00050680473,0.00033169126,0.000017769886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010005173,0.00040795165,0.0001636563,0.0021266947,0.0010853036,0.0003393566,0.00007984154,0.004116272,0.0000010440937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014708166,0.00031121727,0.05471292,0.000023715389,0.00031307997,0.000018095485,0.08570216,0.022503544,0.00024161412,0.8353866,0.0001813731,0.00045862386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004635541,0.0003942143,0.53780484,0.00093532517,0.00055420905,0.00025967293,0.22209705,0.008943246,0.00052989874,0.18197817,0.040615927,0.0012519356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9994468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6534084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07177863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05877157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247957086","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Charter's Transformative Aspirations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Democracy; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Transformative learning; Blueprint; Human rights; Politics; Law; Liberal democracy; Covenant; Liberalism; Sociology; Law and economics; Public administration; Political economy","score_opus":0.02145665105796961,"score_gpt":0.2812952374062414,"score_spread":0.2598385863482718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2247957086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.109756604,0.014308794,0.0013792872,0.14389034,0.0018820376,0.0012175901,0.000010998061,0.00011814045,0.7274362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914732,0.003625585,0.000016265765,0.00018393317,0.0001871789,0.000011605891,4.805895e-7,0.00000547106,0.004496311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704283,0.0003025085,0.0001599892,0.00007533178,0.00030269337,0.0021166606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947506,0.00007711049,0.000063104475,0.000054500913,0.00015330783,0.0001769264],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024055014,0.00008571349,0.00008177249,0.000028361894,0.009109873,0.00024301416,0.00022001464,0.000060041646,0.00005633757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002813552,0.00005407081,0.00008479876,0.00018407402,0.00024644192,0.00027536854,0.0000029322225,0.0010127686,0.0000684687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013065473,0.0000051249904,0.00029124925,2.46682e-7,0.000067272835,4.7333234e-7,0.017713707,0.000002760711,0.0000035007472,0.97534585,0.00031874233,0.0062497742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022108987,0.000062994266,0.0008765848,0.000004129799,0.00002044124,0.000017529706,0.095601454,0.0000034580316,0.000013840045,0.1423467,0.76069045,0.00014131662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12789184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98928493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88171655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031263551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050251824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9921801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2248284683","doi":"","title":"From Total Simulation to Error Determining the Will","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia canonica","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Jurisprudence; Theology","score_opus":0.048306760304624496,"score_gpt":0.3601013815498706,"score_spread":0.3117946212452461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2248284683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9068055,0.00015789528,0.000026666725,0.011725507,0.00051231636,0.0004563819,0.000011525559,0.00008430593,0.080219865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99653906,0.0000305931,0.00019995941,0.00045066822,0.00089645904,0.000039958824,0.000002459537,0.000008673754,0.00183216],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873585,0.00013246166,0.00016162438,0.00023206702,0.00038731884,0.00035067642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999058,0.00050223677,0.000059579263,0.00014734645,0.0001283736,0.00010447408],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002257491,0.00011417788,0.00015567362,0.000013327431,0.0013239044,0.000080043894,0.00023861136,0.000055187185,0.00019936463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007014218,0.00007592435,0.000069969894,0.0002577409,0.00016446366,0.00016829549,0.00014016972,0.000105968276,0.00012805412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014532224,0.00026967042,0.21246216,0.000006713921,0.0005246321,0.000034380068,0.69737095,0.00923128,0.00033886483,0.010576701,0.0264021,0.042637225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027214648,0.000037032412,0.29187775,0.000011604276,0.000033935416,9.1483976e-8,0.016402725,0.000032286196,0.000004656861,0.000058197667,0.6910794,0.0001902033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013462098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018403161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6809682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024552236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002972784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2249178127","doi":"","title":"Section 7 and the Politics of Social Justice","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Injustice; Charter; Politics; Political science; Jurisprudence; Social rights; Redistribution (election); Doctrine; Section (typography); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.019417568292551566,"score_gpt":0.29600428295068215,"score_spread":0.27658671465813056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2249178127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73617727,0.0014305994,0.000025096273,0.040604223,0.0007827306,0.00046935244,0.000015459196,0.00011190272,0.22038335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98950416,0.00012970084,0.00025213265,0.0009012348,0.002561009,0.000011552422,9.38836e-7,0.000005558594,0.0066336924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989396,0.00021723332,0.00016922603,0.0001227219,0.0003042315,0.0002470035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942565,0.0002178654,0.00008895035,0.000066399785,0.00012557684,0.00007557418],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005113396,0.00008226688,0.00016090448,0.000009378773,0.0018889759,0.0000659944,0.00013344488,0.00008964705,0.00013751467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003814788,0.000055716337,0.00006595812,0.00011472839,0.0011201993,0.0002032336,0.000057594796,0.00017014664,0.000034705336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019522684,0.00002356406,0.00042227228,0.000020346717,0.000036197347,2.9469658e-7,0.028082928,0.0000063626903,0.00008275449,0.9636477,0.0069353324,0.0007227103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010620846,0.000017870783,0.009400862,0.000011579689,0.0001415087,7.968132e-7,0.02310117,0.000029019788,0.00016146147,0.0034074602,0.96250576,0.00016041323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011856999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010656778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96024024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012298989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033277593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2249632633","doi":"","title":"Skewering the Credibility of Women: A Reappraisal of Corroboration in Australian Legal History","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Newspaper; Doctrine; Law; Disadvantaged; Legal doctrine; History; Criminology; Sexual assault; Political science; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.02066214647348808,"score_gpt":0.29818472630024045,"score_spread":0.2775225798267524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2249632633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904371,0.00089762086,0.0000107778305,0.0017444594,0.00015035714,0.0001376711,9.958329e-7,0.000010000985,0.0066110096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99541056,0.0012891191,0.000022857546,0.00001562839,0.00015292123,0.000006585343,4.5485586e-7,0.0000046556947,0.003097239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976637,0.0003113116,0.00035637122,0.0001141767,0.00038422237,0.0011702534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994615,0.00008965262,0.00019404541,0.000092291324,0.000108836364,0.00005372163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036923292,0.00008597322,0.00020159854,0.00003246273,0.00022884045,0.000013348195,0.00025408767,0.00006634155,0.00028278452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002999241,0.000060975282,0.000079255624,0.0001942611,0.00042300552,0.000263206,0.000013511734,0.0007829106,0.0000032561263],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007899243,0.0007065049,0.048238713,0.00006116781,0.00039701865,0.0000075403436,0.41290873,0.0012794313,0.0058543608,0.43895724,0.001619899,0.08917947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023692267,0.0012272655,0.15367167,0.0001455888,0.00009276752,0.000046769917,0.3817967,0.00013855266,0.00046759224,0.03310068,0.42621014,0.00073305215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017595034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034758985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42459023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040433984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015988179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252325734","doi":"","title":"Источники права британской колонии Квебек в последней трети XVIII века: проблемы выбора","year":2015,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Сервис в России и за рубежом","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Possession (linguistics); Legal history; Criminal law; English law; Political science; Colonialism; Comparative law; Common law; Private law; Population; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.08736214381171259,"score_gpt":0.3479043318057371,"score_spread":0.2605421879940245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252325734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4250352,0.02569222,0.000097326105,0.051409043,0.01966856,0.0045181448,0.00047994778,0.0020220256,0.47107753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9132941,0.0023442851,0.0011323933,0.0022407088,0.006457399,0.00021083606,0.00009585702,0.00023305361,0.073991366],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98572516,0.0016423491,0.0020595698,0.0024623699,0.0041855164,0.0039250446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99187416,0.0009508943,0.0012446059,0.0015765212,0.0017530902,0.0026007479],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033402299,0.0018567272,0.0022982513,0.00030733724,0.0036548295,0.0011873951,0.0028314332,0.0015394117,0.002607591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036599566,0.0016557361,0.0011596376,0.0023652534,0.0031819213,0.001824676,0.0015397854,0.0018861367,0.013818485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005221658,0.0020217828,0.03469376,0.00045699877,0.0019159064,0.00046604482,0.21756773,0.00023196051,0.00097238406,0.037905425,0.67044234,0.0328035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034659912,0.0006449026,0.01436683,0.00036409023,0.0006227986,0.000022609287,0.07809554,0.00025251237,0.00054307707,0.0025484585,0.89625925,0.0028139665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034717143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009530923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4882589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026964745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012758202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252680423","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004173","title":"Dignity and Membership, Equality and Egalitarianism: Economic Rights and Section 15","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Egalitarianism; Rhetorical question; Law and economics; Appeal; Equity (law); Political science; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02709716758799447,"score_gpt":0.2927739755742289,"score_spread":0.26567680798623444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252680423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97418594,0.0020604415,0.0000069912617,0.002495426,0.00038826506,0.00010907002,0.000014931268,0.000007693145,0.020731246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99870145,0.00010040701,0.00017874411,0.00010958055,0.0005092552,0.0000011687689,4.8193067e-7,0.0000043243963,0.0003945673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891895,0.00019793713,0.0002736672,0.00016176235,0.00015310329,0.00029460902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990088,0.0001398773,0.00017692104,0.00005648113,0.00010643209,0.00051153026],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008624589,0.0001139557,0.00021779221,0.00003963353,0.0013176182,0.000261925,0.00011065556,0.000105839674,0.00007355276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006952031,0.000097912416,0.000036943788,0.000050589857,0.0009792509,0.0006108612,0.000017693137,0.000200045,0.0000024234016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003496606,0.000023855397,0.10702321,0.000068899055,0.00012610485,0.0001308971,0.051484507,0.00002017266,0.00019518187,0.8338049,0.005953094,0.0011341895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010561672,0.0001927983,0.41575792,0.0001805035,0.0001664696,0.00016359387,0.007934124,0.000016641623,0.00029977618,0.09703675,0.47647366,0.0007215985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7453687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9366359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7367682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036696368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025866152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252882086","doi":"","title":"La gouvernance autochtone avec ou sans la Charte canadienne? (Aboriginal Governance with or without the Canadian Charter?)","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Charter; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.00992450353422382,"score_gpt":0.2696000425591104,"score_spread":0.2596755390248866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252882086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5090047,0.032170948,0.00018634259,0.39947414,0.0015058971,0.0010974032,0.00014798723,0.00009863882,0.056313902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85585827,0.02509958,0.00008424609,0.0007706528,0.002358183,0.00003848934,0.0000022754375,0.00005032931,0.11573799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99107915,0.000792461,0.00048346928,0.0005094502,0.00091977423,0.006215674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977985,0.00023116835,0.0005845678,0.00028827306,0.0003093684,0.0007881442],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032536793,0.000559546,0.0005511586,0.000046922392,0.003942864,0.00046458349,0.0011092806,0.00033333266,0.00045288925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013318124,0.00034753146,0.000197613,0.0007056544,0.0018766415,0.0009007856,0.000036913694,0.0045252936,0.00016305405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001538751,0.000109353765,0.010112546,0.000019382724,0.0008021764,0.00014565908,0.060694713,0.00008754117,0.000004330278,0.79243314,0.004522029,0.13091527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010888072,0.00033829425,0.018907024,0.00022666866,0.00020575515,0.0012209981,0.014981088,0.00033812338,0.0000051624415,0.0019106187,0.9601539,0.0006235849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86976534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99971896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95563185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023846556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019389216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253060874","doi":"","title":"The Strange History of Charter-Like Claims Against Legislated Government Services Under the Human Rights Codes in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Statute; Human rights; Appeal; Statutory law; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Statutory interpretation; Fundamental rights; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.013678796667148505,"score_gpt":0.24524191404215748,"score_spread":0.23156311737500898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253060874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798986,0.011637145,0.0000025043573,0.0024528913,0.00055481645,0.00018546748,0.000004148873,0.000007261546,0.005257195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994996,0.0018632191,0.0000013663224,0.00015270739,0.00027854144,0.0000074035656,0.0000010714477,0.0000071738677,0.0026925246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99673235,0.00034633928,0.00029516593,0.00009895376,0.0008323273,0.0016948582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934584,0.00013999418,0.00025737245,0.00011171975,0.00006363618,0.00008141104],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001829877,0.00013386975,0.00017039673,0.000009890102,0.0014482508,0.00003160084,0.00049187074,0.00005190642,0.00002786701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000064761916,0.00006994597,0.00007219469,0.00009501669,0.00026161954,0.00023330652,0.00003521996,0.0009056323,0.0000024286392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012409531,0.00043992946,0.1619694,0.000049686707,0.00197165,0.000009275793,0.17352812,0.0001683473,0.0024633207,0.6396492,0.0085928,0.011034202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010289517,0.00009677478,0.12528214,0.00007569091,0.00009491933,0.000008577507,0.37434077,0.00003135032,0.000063274165,0.013811218,0.48469332,0.00047301166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91962147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.625838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01972331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019400509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253362603","doi":"","title":"Rencontre des Cultures Juridiques dans la Toundra Subarctique: Vers une Nouvelle Gouvernance Foncière au Nunatsiavut (Legal Cultures Encounter in the Subarctic Toundra: Towards a New Land Governance in Nunatsiavut)","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007839938328262373,"score_gpt":0.2780338457300933,"score_spread":0.27019390740183097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253362603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79265153,0.078319415,0.00011252324,0.09588137,0.0011225585,0.0009026838,0.00003111647,0.000077540244,0.030901255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9094628,0.07258052,0.0001525734,0.00073485845,0.0016846795,0.000029331672,0.0000056573167,0.00003909707,0.015310474],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903467,0.0015335105,0.0010618217,0.00081934175,0.0016107946,0.0046277842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792445,0.00038208414,0.0007070831,0.00034403658,0.0003418515,0.00030047222],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033822658,0.00087255996,0.000947258,0.000092633265,0.0017832762,0.00078264775,0.0017576267,0.00064289983,0.000076665485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092869136,0.00061435887,0.000534433,0.0015997087,0.0016226091,0.0022722208,0.000112635586,0.0050730226,0.000029328361],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055074686,0.00089408655,0.03668745,0.000096946234,0.00046730583,0.0005055081,0.47227407,0.0003761267,0.00022065255,0.4356187,0.009372575,0.042935837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043757013,0.0012718391,0.24014288,0.0012542797,0.0003065934,0.0009778449,0.2848645,0.00006757105,0.00012741504,0.27253443,0.19233266,0.0017443193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42067102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9065787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48590767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020317677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0092418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253413733","doi":"","title":"Human Rights and Family Responsibilities: Family Status Discrimination Under Human Rights Law in British Columbia and Canada -- A Study Paper","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Sexual orientation; Human rights; Law; Nationality; Political science; Jurisprudence; Legislation; Sociology; Immigration; Gender studies","score_opus":0.016026536154098034,"score_gpt":0.28418039803439105,"score_spread":0.268153861880293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253413733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932997,0.0029543655,0.0000012755661,0.00017731624,0.00015028055,0.00047555738,0.00000761209,0.00002144399,0.0029124354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99548596,0.00017922909,0.000008730085,0.00010120077,0.00022633243,0.00001868776,0.0000028702902,0.000012209888,0.003964807],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958371,0.000672991,0.00037680598,0.0002777183,0.0006274586,0.0022079514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992856,0.00011767436,0.000134596,0.0000932489,0.00012752802,0.000241387],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001995146,0.00015584516,0.00029100932,0.00003537257,0.004818735,0.00048123713,0.000150612,0.000092541784,0.000029772482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040552535,0.00016986458,0.000037279457,0.00013191086,0.00041677197,0.00081260834,0.000064414926,0.0009159536,7.1339304e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005257321,0.0010166408,0.51680183,0.000030768006,0.0005680627,0.000053274165,0.12746263,0.0000027421888,0.00067262485,0.34891975,0.0026752145,0.0017438628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009983061,0.00019665934,0.7468544,0.000031317697,0.000045442535,0.000012020826,0.1615197,3.6928526e-7,6.8263586e-7,0.08066305,0.009412739,0.00026529643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26825672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035135532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006367154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253516837","doi":"10.29173/alr1343","title":"Loyalty and Distinctiveness: A New Approach to the Crown's Fiduciary Duty toward Aboriginal Peoples","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Duty; Flourishing; Charter; Law; Negotiation; Political science; Supreme court; Loyalty; Faith; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Theology","score_opus":0.03746424019614437,"score_gpt":0.33333762283838714,"score_spread":0.2958733826422428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253516837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0120220715,0.23578139,0.0002494165,0.065348655,0.0006249857,0.0038462277,0.000013782643,0.000095600255,0.68201786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77316135,0.18250522,0.0027956837,0.014912025,0.000926553,0.00054194994,0.000016645858,0.000048472517,0.025092103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981355,0.0005260868,0.00023769356,0.00038621994,0.00033079585,0.00038369503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875844,0.00059620565,0.00008985222,0.00023424336,0.00008896,0.0002323184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081146555,0.00020090058,0.00040391245,0.0000066088955,0.0010373214,0.00011233429,0.00031464515,0.00005817774,0.00025001925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014160257,0.00011705549,0.000114368086,0.0003358002,0.00031133488,0.00017408648,0.000059064358,0.00014156051,0.00017148204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008838206,0.000077682234,0.0027072213,0.0009282014,0.00008495495,0.000001430797,0.030694237,0.0000017546661,0.0000013797172,0.92143416,0.037379082,0.006681048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089809386,0.000010577543,0.0036253755,0.00040512622,0.000095569965,0.0000028242248,0.0011097882,5.1075955e-7,0.0000021979192,0.00023729778,0.994228,0.0001929256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10529688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07278894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9568489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096402255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017306425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94413024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253764572","doi":"10.21991/c9dd3z","title":"HOW CAN INFRINGEMENTS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF ABORIGINAL PEOPLES BE JUSTIFIED?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Trilogy; Constitution; Bill of rights; Political science; Government (linguistics); Fishing; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.039783466332995385,"score_gpt":0.28808667613706007,"score_spread":0.24830320980406467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253764572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2977123,0.0026143794,0.023355754,0.0391472,0.013325831,0.004726763,0.0047143996,0.0004823853,0.613921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968599,0.000123287,0.0015527101,0.0002664418,0.00015859815,0.00007573741,0.000043607364,0.00000577221,0.00091395504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99653697,0.00018693558,0.0007271467,0.0004718309,0.0012744056,0.000802715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997366,0.00027302213,0.00061420107,0.0003856484,0.0011229228,0.000238175],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047061098,0.00038129318,0.0005309743,0.00015996525,0.003382366,0.0000683738,0.0008592427,0.00025512287,0.00033319433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009171734,0.00028275404,0.00041466823,0.0006520495,0.041336868,0.0007360562,0.00024425483,0.00031351557,0.000013695584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048786118,0.00017915518,0.062306732,0.000043838998,0.00019825317,0.0000050611916,0.002589833,0.000054899156,0.00034382794,0.9320113,0.0021364496,0.0000818412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038985831,0.00015666873,0.029468482,0.0009391786,0.0006535459,0.00008756812,0.04640145,0.00004720988,0.008420222,0.061156526,0.84722847,0.0015420911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005426072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010534616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8708548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042465606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003363442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254494288","doi":"","title":"Domestic Violence and the Construction of 'Ideal Victims': Assaulted Women's 'Image Problems' in Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Saint Louis University public law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Agency (philosophy); Acknowledgement; Context (archaeology); Ideal (ethics); Criminology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Poison control; Sociology; Suicide prevention; Computer security; Medicine","score_opus":0.01368615533496723,"score_gpt":0.25549906045984383,"score_spread":0.2418129051248766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254494288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3431828,0.08687673,0.00035408535,0.24845283,0.00062173075,0.009605194,0.00007022521,0.00055807317,0.31027833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92474717,0.07374898,0.00034670267,0.0010463663,0.000025119436,0.0000036838137,0.000003066752,0.0000030291399,0.00007585116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817073,0.0007078277,0.00023871582,0.00022635191,0.00032743838,0.0003289427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906117,0.00022148114,0.00020274721,0.00014275075,0.00026008277,0.00011175629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014845511,0.00012859527,0.0004236023,0.00003278246,0.0005969799,0.00006156514,0.00029444983,0.00007359761,0.00007985108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039874457,0.00009118172,0.00007940217,0.00064628944,0.0026939358,0.00044680786,0.000088544046,0.0001978476,0.0000067558935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009328087,0.00003235219,0.00023917179,0.00020523321,0.000020903723,0.000004305258,0.0029618475,7.578062e-7,0.0000055109663,0.9875414,0.000046159323,0.008933023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022012535,0.00009469617,0.0030212626,0.003499879,0.00010782889,0.00000821178,0.009678572,0.000020824064,0.0000027940305,0.017988028,0.96299636,0.0003802941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013284359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032531978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96955335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060155086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007283247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99328625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254746409","doi":"","title":"Le ad populum dans l‚arrêt “Langstaff c. Bar of the Province of Quebec“ (1916)","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Publications Doc Du Juriste","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Geography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.015503972555144636,"score_gpt":0.27285444618363053,"score_spread":0.2573504736284859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254746409","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23036714,0.007263591,0.00020400272,0.5532812,0.0011427606,0.0016461614,0.00028930526,0.00014604736,0.20565979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.922424,0.00042875463,0.00067313446,0.00023817644,0.0002110945,0.000042626394,0.000013110419,0.000011786044,0.07595732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975775,0.0003752697,0.0006371333,0.0003504743,0.0006066365,0.0004530261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977969,0.00014211673,0.0006467158,0.00059628,0.00067891326,0.00013905416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052444724,0.00021425058,0.0003623364,0.000052406747,0.001078739,0.000095438656,0.0010504414,0.00017300672,0.00013852208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071831275,0.00016705021,0.00028620017,0.0010981207,0.0017123045,0.0006852053,0.00016042996,0.00022551193,0.00004609449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070496176,0.00080962665,0.0077592926,0.000082350525,0.00009604728,5.813703e-7,0.024415867,0.000022114291,0.0006747818,0.9064268,0.046855778,0.012849695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023949475,0.00004871668,0.30983803,0.000069947855,0.00008983923,0.0000014547676,0.007621402,0.000039781746,0.00037954148,0.0018286775,0.67962205,0.00022105678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0520866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055317763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9045981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003506861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007594722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9619202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255134162","doi":"","title":"Redress Packages for Institutional Child Abuse: Exploring the Grandview Agreement as a Case Study in 'Alternative' Dispute Resolution","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Tort; Human settlement; Liability; Engineering","score_opus":0.12466087013505432,"score_gpt":0.3870544596650099,"score_spread":0.26239358952995556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255134162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857074,0.00035776172,0.0005532927,0.0026115575,0.0004640446,0.0019983428,0.0000051012044,0.000045666126,0.008256854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981459,0.00034740134,0.00017036866,0.0001125881,0.0003834197,0.00036094576,0.0000020704106,0.0000048831903,0.00047245857],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983901,0.00017325906,0.0002937264,0.00025762361,0.000496794,0.0003885082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930114,0.00031384415,0.00007845899,0.0001123975,0.00012101848,0.00007315366],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021131663,0.00013090241,0.00016104624,0.00004545544,0.0023645451,0.00008316857,0.00020361043,0.00003230881,0.000027343533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032262885,0.00007953601,0.00007522658,0.00028705155,0.00029306268,0.00036722203,0.00005540042,0.00014220279,0.00001126511],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021272313,0.0011227565,0.042794995,0.000049482256,0.0002848671,0.0009533966,0.78254247,0.00032531933,0.000020016992,0.13803674,0.00055581727,0.03310145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037003404,0.00035112418,0.23898147,0.00022044517,0.00009328977,0.000057103392,0.6441795,0.000110491324,0.00015334682,0.0009083358,0.11063846,0.00060609065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.071112394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26937875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19826636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040765575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029234357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99893427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255962489","doi":"","title":"First Nations Self-Government and the Borders of the Canadian Legal Imagination","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Treaty; Sovereignty; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; International law; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.005387310696429375,"score_gpt":0.2534695639295857,"score_spread":0.24808225323315633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255962489","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4150812,0.006603028,0.00011506751,0.4719652,0.00058523775,0.0008839527,0.00000823568,0.000030922045,0.10472714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899014,0.0078179855,0.000016625761,0.0001202816,0.0001249405,0.000004456019,1.3995346e-7,0.0000034848867,0.002010639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842143,0.00015197252,0.00012276384,0.00006816455,0.0004945691,0.0007410773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995381,0.00012632222,0.00011114998,0.00005366439,0.00011489869,0.000055847064],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013992647,0.00006178983,0.000075624004,0.000018018549,0.0039366013,0.00009666958,0.0002211208,0.00003308873,0.000015602387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041004928,0.000033223238,0.00006043999,0.00022747109,0.00038335272,0.0001755926,0.000023118153,0.00048464217,0.0000015097187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008816043,0.000015238602,0.011554764,0.0000016278906,0.00011042841,3.714752e-7,0.013579949,0.000023756673,0.000002360931,0.9728927,0.00024357664,0.0015664151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023321863,0.000068840985,0.0739031,0.00003540162,0.00017874103,0.00007601941,0.11485598,0.00026851922,0.000014969612,0.088708,0.71928006,0.00027817726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4284646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99335504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8841847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029774366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016018809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256564956","doi":"","title":"Intimacy, Rights and the Parent-Child Relationship: Rethinking Freedom of Association in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Political science; Sociology; Family law; Law; Gender studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010627605626796944,"score_gpt":0.249423722021246,"score_spread":0.23879611639444906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256564956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9752673,0.0027463345,0.000051643823,0.019257661,0.00020014685,0.00017001313,0.0000013771911,0.0000064390156,0.0022991225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983252,0.0012428091,0.000041489504,0.00004455538,0.00014174472,0.0000030584379,7.4600064e-7,0.0000033487793,0.00019700793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803376,0.00031254216,0.0002648047,0.000089830166,0.00048878783,0.00081027637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991631,0.00036355312,0.00028687122,0.00004562408,0.000104396546,0.00003649045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002924506,0.00007341299,0.00015980651,0.000027505137,0.0011049707,0.00003949783,0.00016377213,0.000057758793,0.0000053973213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009085986,0.000047457717,0.000044772034,0.00020153786,0.00014355178,0.00017323712,0.00002569249,0.0012434368,8.3525185e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003042153,0.000015544168,0.28341448,0.00000270962,0.00011094408,0.000001244735,0.03293476,0.00041643606,0.0000020140258,0.6824993,0.000072167284,0.0005000075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019854978,0.000021134141,0.1289503,0.000059516125,0.000039831255,0.000007021387,0.030267198,0.000018683912,0.0000055175965,0.83774906,0.000776741,0.00011951573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9774465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99893034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15524979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008867086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028418147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257020633","doi":"","title":"The Celebration of Same-Sex Marriage","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Homosexuality; Compassion; Politics; State (computer science); Sociology; Gender studies; Gender equality; Same sex; Introspection; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.022228375124676618,"score_gpt":0.2893949064207124,"score_spread":0.2671665312960358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257020633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.631167,0.0015845564,0.00004173953,0.012121042,0.00081915496,0.0006215983,0.000009265844,0.00015710418,0.35347852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98239255,0.0006964103,0.00022635884,0.00034831624,0.00051168725,0.000026984208,0.0000027363922,0.000008109079,0.015786855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858004,0.00022870349,0.0002355305,0.00016756942,0.0004579669,0.00033017216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991925,0.0002650577,0.00012255523,0.0001822637,0.00012478574,0.000112874186],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067204,0.000103325176,0.00015615947,0.000009784293,0.0015901428,0.00012559793,0.0003141526,0.00008748757,0.00043019332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041920407,0.000068674635,0.000091315655,0.00021340432,0.0005162843,0.00026652933,0.00006378521,0.00015338456,0.00019874179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009067872,0.00017351787,0.061317373,0.000032011376,0.00019833354,0.000015550624,0.035889298,0.00004943563,0.0040576695,0.8247546,0.042345997,0.031075522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025874624,0.000030801883,0.012471651,0.000015686916,0.000016496728,4.5978197e-7,0.01086987,0.000012758465,0.0006849061,0.0045173536,0.970963,0.00015824857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024624381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052148588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.928617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001289676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004407878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257707695","doi":"10.7202/1057482ar","title":"Les origines intellectuelles et les caractéristiques institutionnelles et axiologiques du droit matrimonial occidental moderne","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025711727016912198,"score_gpt":0.3003547611711174,"score_spread":0.2746430341542052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257707695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9188367,0.013788114,0.000919897,0.011708441,0.0017400559,0.00094753795,0.00013297514,0.00040949433,0.051516764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94685507,0.02918817,0.0018840828,0.00033886955,0.0015270517,0.0000743295,0.00007628213,0.00006156874,0.019994587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99562836,0.0011231059,0.00079127547,0.00088214595,0.0005157128,0.0010593772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755794,0.0009777901,0.00046552424,0.00035994028,0.000353944,0.00028486847],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013949776,0.0005483661,0.0009708463,0.00012871614,0.0010247446,0.0003553566,0.00078423397,0.00086540286,0.0010071285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009722885,0.00066396047,0.0005423689,0.0004621232,0.0014500618,0.0009989444,0.00036401002,0.0010454251,0.0007099639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019000385,0.0004810774,0.17222987,0.0006496723,0.00045462255,0.00013701779,0.047870923,0.002187586,0.0007856598,0.7580798,0.004039356,0.012894398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039017345,0.0016326588,0.26941705,0.004669112,0.0010871639,0.0005484845,0.06994398,0.013367033,0.0036685758,0.13065246,0.49461582,0.0064959247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.096722916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02191919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62742734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013428109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003569161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257961456","doi":"10.21991/c9h08n","title":"ABORIGINAL SELF-DETERMINATION WITHIN CANADA: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Political science; International law; International human rights law; Self-determination","score_opus":0.031012645982357485,"score_gpt":0.3012560663024693,"score_spread":0.27024342032011184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257961456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09115054,0.00023793704,0.0018290397,0.0062073176,0.008890681,0.0014931649,0.00020687772,0.0004170399,0.88956743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937008,0.000058139947,0.0047379094,0.0006285604,0.00016774319,0.00012053986,0.00010761172,0.000006879433,0.0004718396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967664,0.00013494307,0.0007242141,0.00051636447,0.0010173263,0.00084075925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858385,0.0000806793,0.00026724135,0.00015938914,0.0006536484,0.00025518404],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000560987,0.00032044319,0.00030470744,0.00015585798,0.004004212,0.00009755349,0.00054743653,0.00020027779,0.000482546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012730288,0.00030483658,0.0000851333,0.00039838286,0.0035430703,0.0010204925,0.000099256686,0.00032715482,0.00006994308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025271238,0.00015996065,0.03180774,0.0000062253266,0.000071278126,0.0000630974,0.00335646,0.000022131422,0.000019062052,0.96313095,0.0011575035,0.00018031341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014175478,0.000024204135,0.01096807,0.00014492105,0.00003379796,0.000031018753,0.00483673,0.000056675715,0.00036032056,0.017047774,0.96442384,0.0006550783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5549487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94439167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9632664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032782415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030647076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258308187","doi":"","title":"Law Deans, Legal Coercion and the Freedoms of Association and Religion in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Coercion (linguistics); Diversity (politics); Civil law (Civil law); Comparative law; Morality; Constitutional law; Liberalism; Perspective (graphical); Public law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0047230315811823435,"score_gpt":0.22289019848545497,"score_spread":0.21816716690427262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258308187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97560734,0.004555141,0.0000071692393,0.016765703,0.00009500522,0.00019833939,8.7502866e-7,0.000003576489,0.0027668376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877435,0.011492337,0.000008858348,0.00012027332,0.00008921914,0.000005185129,3.4966718e-7,0.0000031603947,0.0005371123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850017,0.00020373157,0.0001858178,0.00007651663,0.00031967784,0.00071408664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994511,0.00020813411,0.00016623382,0.000030813368,0.00010280067,0.000040937368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016023155,0.00006406471,0.00014790498,0.000013191682,0.0004543077,0.00005747288,0.00009161567,0.00004597843,0.000005599549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021675359,0.000040548864,0.000023927581,0.00008651468,0.00018785927,0.00023166655,0.000023626568,0.00055971986,8.1672863e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023984034,0.000008668533,0.07515717,0.0000034659301,0.000069360736,5.030395e-7,0.004656414,0.00000693065,0.000051318715,0.917168,0.0004524532,0.002401686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006398527,0.0001962673,0.1970626,0.00010128093,0.00013192148,0.00003619528,0.22293487,0.0003200291,0.00007533679,0.54971987,0.022488534,0.0005345714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9942962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36744818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002851839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097402476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.745746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258663494","doi":"","title":"Developments in Family Law: The 1998-1999 Term","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Appeal; Family law; Obligation; Majority opinion; Precedent; CONTEST; Common law","score_opus":0.036698215915954874,"score_gpt":0.26712373934833644,"score_spread":0.23042552343238157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258663494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40752822,0.001141279,0.000004406298,0.003250779,0.00011326401,0.0001968579,0.0000023917748,0.000036423142,0.58772635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986755,0.0010585034,0.00053598837,0.00009743563,0.000027908201,3.3700493e-7,6.1845026e-7,0.0000029514322,0.01152123],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916965,0.00010585394,0.00005861119,0.00013958784,0.00028347012,0.00024282956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996759,0.000065058026,0.00006720975,0.000098637,0.00003652716,0.000056667282],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018530966,0.000078910736,0.00013887374,0.000008516012,0.0007987794,0.000015572898,0.0003717899,0.00006792121,0.0017039522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022315024,0.0000698359,0.000056094905,0.00007305875,0.000453989,0.00037908,0.000121418416,0.000077602075,0.000085906526],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020363384,0.00011282298,0.017945513,0.000013909604,0.00007921575,0.00001817196,0.9209543,0.000003801471,0.0002889501,0.015381444,0.0056235595,0.039557956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003284243,0.00001386723,0.7225614,0.000018335786,0.000011566422,1.04226984e-7,0.16407211,0.000013507341,0.0000037297368,0.0000132016585,0.11284459,0.000119163036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7136564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7236569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7568822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005472784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017678976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258726175","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review as a Limit to Indigenous Self-Governance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Judicial review; Standard of review; Adjudication; Deference; Political science; Judicial deference; Administrative law; Corporate governance; Law; Rule of law; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.02583393593041864,"score_gpt":0.35951647296149847,"score_spread":0.3336825370310798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258726175","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008312648,0.9855342,0.000020478737,0.0022393798,0.0007320555,0.0018177856,0.000007165957,0.000120093835,0.0095205335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00002944917,0.98996484,0.0000662779,0.0009114126,0.0035974164,0.0001253268,0.000005454393,0.00006878318,0.00523102],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991314,0.0011430014,0.0010408412,0.00055522815,0.001364847,0.0045820647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974732,0.0002701203,0.0012330494,0.00029331713,0.00031334852,0.00041696822],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005590704,0.0006340695,0.002501618,0.000079214136,0.0021443774,0.00019535134,0.0015256662,0.00043046116,0.00014354227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016774645,0.00047168162,0.0011092346,0.00085126347,0.00013846399,0.0002016509,0.00018220312,0.00419093,0.0017015394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029846026,0.000046026744,0.0000025656275,0.0027405536,0.0005945045,0.000009057785,0.0024825823,8.053333e-8,1.5378735e-8,0.031711373,0.0031368863,0.95927334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102237565,0.00021688532,0.0000026649184,0.016948398,0.0011002491,0.00014282849,0.00041064073,2.0412044e-8,1.9698033e-8,0.0032544064,0.97724825,0.00057342503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034668185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013207478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9741113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009555182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011918009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258761409","doi":"","title":"Developments in Family Law: The 2000-2001 Term","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Family law; Supreme court; Political science; Child support; Common law; Constitutional law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02985694181921984,"score_gpt":0.29399864253572255,"score_spread":0.2641417007165027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258761409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9307236,0.0041993386,0.000017805018,0.0039305617,0.00030491067,0.00022494353,7.228251e-7,0.00003483311,0.06056329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752442,0.015711788,0.000052573683,0.0004413735,0.00032744984,0.000010145344,5.746238e-7,0.000008885774,0.008203002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964268,0.00023931472,0.00024849785,0.00014619692,0.00053225463,0.002406936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959,0.00006380117,0.00010245805,0.0000733939,0.00008857712,0.00008180167],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019335292,0.00012779163,0.00016262758,0.00003318433,0.0023182312,0.000056623496,0.00044845574,0.000077086646,0.000027692005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012647171,0.00008095056,0.000077382865,0.00027397173,0.0003818502,0.00025141137,0.00004963541,0.0012901479,0.00007948472],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006288973,0.00026066348,0.31384397,0.000004695996,0.00040537672,0.00007377218,0.15088776,0.000022217742,0.00036278283,0.5002053,0.0046144747,0.029256096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014475433,0.00011285097,0.6024532,0.000042073163,0.000026347145,0.00016977734,0.06096963,0.0000031379716,0.000024861658,0.03929722,0.29489338,0.0005600039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010358873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08893086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4609081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034286382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002581397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99898064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259093601","doi":"","title":"The Bride Wore Pink. . . to the Property (Relationships) Legislation Amendment Act 1999","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Legislation; Law; State (computer science); Property (philosophy); Political science; Amendment","score_opus":0.0677563960428675,"score_gpt":0.3233968863395125,"score_spread":0.25564049029664504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259093601","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06503114,0.0006621342,0.00033761014,0.7004336,0.00042178255,0.0017689648,0.0000030227789,0.00021171196,0.23113002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.936615,0.00019703682,0.00051672343,0.0010524223,0.0007216103,0.0000962561,0.0000015916395,0.000005700749,0.060793687],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852175,0.00030219997,0.00018547862,0.00016895645,0.00049414934,0.00032748745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992272,0.00035600187,0.000060692757,0.00016467656,0.00010614428,0.000085259024],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011216915,0.00010047241,0.00008159769,0.000010699622,0.004515292,0.00024947824,0.00032372985,0.000048408463,0.00015849296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000600297,0.00003687412,0.00006236831,0.00025214104,0.00019941424,0.00025597302,0.000081258615,0.00018286478,0.00058067316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035384146,0.00008839694,0.016190294,0.000002805167,0.00010704778,5.638637e-7,0.24073906,0.0014595614,0.0001313257,0.07241723,0.43465543,0.23417291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006983849,0.000010591397,0.030047253,0.000005706529,0.000009262993,1.2441677e-7,0.014238545,0.00013005077,0.00003881226,0.00013147813,0.955227,0.00009130794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008715862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10022043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8715838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035196022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048727237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99788517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259465928","doi":"","title":"Autonomous from the Start: Single Mothers by Choice in the Canadian Legal System","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Independence (probability theory); Family law; Resistance (ecology); Single mothers; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.01779563686818581,"score_gpt":0.2612788354287886,"score_spread":0.2434831985606028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259465928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9173051,0.016931249,0.000029159066,0.04179731,0.0007567883,0.0004790433,0.000021708165,0.000045540328,0.022634115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968263,0.0002116499,0.000008404055,0.0005823969,0.0012142014,0.000011521818,0.0000023988118,0.000011335021,0.0011318123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958483,0.00065517164,0.00020604521,0.00011918262,0.0004690655,0.002702251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992469,0.00029869005,0.000118523145,0.00011950055,0.000051014507,0.00016536991],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032935825,0.00013516871,0.0001439971,0.000023370485,0.002459424,0.00029983543,0.0006506271,0.000095616684,0.000036996666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020445268,0.00007361751,0.00008484291,0.00021754108,0.00020548029,0.00038288432,0.000018801804,0.0014036858,0.000050827428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030445852,0.000244616,0.19143648,0.000007042948,0.0006454168,0.000009922667,0.31576213,0.00004734968,0.00027185408,0.44488177,0.027579557,0.019083422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037143676,0.00005854443,0.02071613,0.000022184071,0.00004953126,0.000020345013,0.29255897,0.000013094221,0.0000093038625,0.0014064239,0.6845323,0.00024175557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9192723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99078745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65695274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008282155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017512301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99883926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259563497","doi":"","title":"Abortion, Judicial Activism and Constitutional Crossroads","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Popular sovereignty; Sovereignty; Law; Charter; Deference; Parliamentary sovereignty; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01346927211545076,"score_gpt":0.3040305800606453,"score_spread":0.2905613079451946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259563497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96339285,0.0042403922,0.007658797,0.015430643,0.00056723604,0.00020684341,0.000003472658,0.000078609235,0.008421149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926883,0.0055567357,0.00009671861,0.00014183862,0.00091780344,0.0000045341844,0.0000010178636,0.000004818795,0.00058823026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769753,0.000074537646,0.0001785098,0.00015355142,0.00041513485,0.0014807176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995304,0.00003846236,0.00010858641,0.000040435578,0.00016263855,0.00011947667],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011276195,0.00011078069,0.00014053917,0.00003516746,0.002524709,0.00013462367,0.00013459199,0.00008981067,0.000033439086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002551098,0.00009228446,0.00006777045,0.00015090904,0.0024799118,0.00039430332,0.000028611028,0.0009275986,0.000024691157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015078071,0.000030079786,0.0028264057,8.661996e-7,0.00007292204,0.0000024786905,0.0035181632,0.000022053777,0.00013773626,0.98969513,0.000055375873,0.003623694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016659404,0.00014894367,0.017773494,0.00002843007,0.00005447613,0.00015916908,0.021148581,0.000001437693,0.00009290433,0.9209284,0.037664026,0.00033415642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017359584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072069396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068766706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019318121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031937212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259642444","doi":"","title":"The Application of the Canadian Charter in the Health Care Context","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Scrutiny; Health care; Political science; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Law; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.013463692102245808,"score_gpt":0.3029314425865334,"score_spread":0.2894677504842876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259642444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48488352,0.030032417,0.000056893783,0.4688874,0.00039543997,0.0013653963,0.000004609547,0.000013672235,0.01436066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99478674,0.003735026,0.0000012129566,0.0008625076,0.00020533252,0.000016273076,4.2808242e-7,0.0000033027784,0.00038917316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784935,0.00039941326,0.00017125552,0.0000716186,0.00032750718,0.0011808899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951375,0.00008347612,0.00013978708,0.0001092931,0.00010327116,0.000050417668],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002244379,0.00006063295,0.00008372587,0.000014859702,0.0031432468,0.000063563726,0.00053013506,0.000038789833,0.0000042918923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009129622,0.000026180705,0.000066529574,0.00024283839,0.00023122673,0.000060229384,0.000012605926,0.00080388994,0.0000057786533],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014265228,0.000017608525,0.036833167,0.0000025711472,0.000050384864,4.155515e-7,0.20723023,0.0000050165904,0.0000057619336,0.5651975,0.0010703558,0.18957268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022993187,0.00005949323,0.052224405,0.000010495159,0.000007878259,0.000012818093,0.46325636,0.000005773322,0.0000018436981,0.014882305,0.4692347,0.00007399537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6434393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55031526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028655154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029090822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259646108","doi":"","title":"Inclusive Interpretations: Social and Economic Rights and the Canadian Charter","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; International human rights law; Interpretation (philosophy); Legitimacy; Law; Fundamental rights; Right to property; Social rights; Charter; Reservation of rights; Mandate; Linguistic rights; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.006592386414397481,"score_gpt":0.27072668146459444,"score_spread":0.264134295050197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259646108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87201667,0.0026316012,0.00009750481,0.09453275,0.00036419716,0.0003541141,0.0000036581546,0.000022593846,0.029976908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99746597,0.0007010223,0.00000921366,0.00033706983,0.0006306402,0.0000066997513,4.4922515e-7,0.00000393856,0.00084501854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985074,0.00027139837,0.00012129808,0.000101978476,0.00010842584,0.00088951836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996196,0.00012679015,0.00007878211,0.000029813371,0.00004754943,0.00009747535],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016612937,0.000078595,0.0001265451,0.000031600463,0.004591943,0.00019559456,0.00013224411,0.00005830856,0.000023970088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009472082,0.000048621747,0.00004190365,0.000032587894,0.00064038346,0.0001813061,0.000032596156,0.0005645818,0.000014502796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011974992,0.0000019497074,0.000756821,7.2726124e-7,0.000086433865,1.9743182e-7,0.061044786,5.1696895e-7,0.000001024882,0.93128806,0.0002672454,0.006540244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012621459,0.000052706408,0.006456662,0.0000087987455,0.000059907732,0.00002550968,0.028004585,0.00017303384,0.0000014038143,0.8756364,0.08812483,0.00019402445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4396746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98402566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5443511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015626546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078990735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259716125","doi":"","title":"National Responsibility and Systemic Racism in Criminal Sentencing: The Case of R. v. Hamilton","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Racism; Political science; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Sociology; History","score_opus":0.026432736139632127,"score_gpt":0.3271622273841743,"score_spread":0.3007294912445421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259716125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914641,0.004233473,0.00005184674,0.0032478727,0.00006302275,0.0001670262,0.0000015792049,0.000008569477,0.00076250464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99717474,0.0020404232,0.000050006962,0.00005058328,0.00025448765,0.0000043102746,2.006022e-7,0.0000039104007,0.00042131043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978251,0.00052225386,0.00030751154,0.0001344855,0.00035339326,0.0008572571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918264,0.0003160206,0.00016020499,0.0000588696,0.0002340228,0.000048250058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063277637,0.00008703731,0.00015021833,0.000051265793,0.0007769345,0.000036409634,0.00014826703,0.0000613396,0.000009923698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007889915,0.000056656012,0.000059984497,0.00017152974,0.00040462683,0.00021295164,0.000028756582,0.00083171355,0.0000028277793],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040521525,0.00023954302,0.01917736,0.000056962697,0.00025880517,0.000117696014,0.26175964,0.0003163247,0.0016211723,0.63465494,0.0002459877,0.08114634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018591428,0.00023757368,0.027407372,0.0001357729,0.00010783944,0.007685574,0.8656853,0.00067358854,0.00012801506,0.09304244,0.0026297607,0.0004076585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005215358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1174319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60392565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020271936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011718558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89867264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260143363","doi":"","title":"Blais et Powley : les doctrines des droits aborigènes des métis sous la loupe (The Blais and Powley Cases: Métis Aboriginal Rights Doctrines Examined)","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Metis; Supreme court; Humanities; Ethnology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.014926748500194141,"score_gpt":0.30707884266304253,"score_spread":0.2921520941628484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260143363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8404377,0.13655436,0.0005129161,0.017662281,0.0010206853,0.00051992066,0.00005714248,0.00013466601,0.0031003426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7384111,0.2387627,0.00023316428,0.00007101819,0.0018358001,0.000037264675,0.0000024066735,0.000052816737,0.020593712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891122,0.0018959064,0.0009870159,0.00088163733,0.0011559224,0.005967313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99494,0.0025101346,0.0006764293,0.00035359806,0.0009716269,0.00054820714],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050521675,0.0009809595,0.00093630585,0.00020373905,0.0068994346,0.00077035115,0.0010734648,0.00048326404,0.0003591607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008741388,0.0005603167,0.0004635982,0.0011130987,0.0064198063,0.0018554983,0.00023101376,0.0021500767,0.00014360948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022701375,0.0003214409,0.034651436,0.00010594834,0.001359578,0.00023719615,0.02285472,0.000008145513,0.00049789745,0.7103039,0.0012902904,0.22814246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003356389,0.0016029447,0.051975403,0.0012486572,0.0009946551,0.005426373,0.023902168,0.000015427877,0.00042506345,0.36522397,0.5439388,0.001890132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052680757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19684799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5426485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002782672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017849028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260525329","doi":"","title":"Rights Based Strategies to Address Homelessness and Poverty in Canada: The Charter Framework","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Charter; Political science; Public administration; Economic growth; Development economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.00931024944145643,"score_gpt":0.2598482252119281,"score_spread":0.25053797577047165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260525329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9689576,0.0010537885,0.0013988089,0.025280852,0.00037954835,0.00030857054,0.000003040683,0.000019350831,0.0025984365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985021,0.00026407957,0.000035113106,0.00070274406,0.00033740062,0.000012378313,3.0994326e-7,0.000006537165,0.00013933648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997246,0.00039329706,0.00017779374,0.00016303668,0.00043874074,0.001581096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924767,0.00038338779,0.00007814913,0.00009126558,0.00008209816,0.000117413314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016566227,0.00013114355,0.00020164349,0.000029881974,0.0010856017,0.00017043091,0.00032854438,0.00006555728,0.000035792145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021619404,0.000076211945,0.0000359624,0.00021315065,0.0001090723,0.0001861356,0.000031454365,0.0011111025,0.000004346637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007558048,0.000043170498,0.025098309,0.000011161436,0.00012645921,0.0000066720713,0.032363042,0.0002681588,0.000027389138,0.92506605,0.00088681874,0.01602719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010858772,0.00018139536,0.17883922,0.0001465404,0.00004758513,0.000010628368,0.22082712,0.00025401782,0.000037440717,0.54741323,0.050445646,0.0007112848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87503946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3776528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021259754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003226728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8349681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260864533","doi":"","title":"Evolution of Yukon's Aboriginal Law and the Goal of Reconciliation: A 360 Degree Perspective","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Degree (music); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.011509005557719033,"score_gpt":0.2911508909931334,"score_spread":0.27964188543541435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260864533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.941937,0.0114430785,0.0013355114,0.0054971147,0.00021364824,0.00029167617,0.0000035467692,0.000012020111,0.039266404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99735594,0.002078935,0.000084359264,0.000014273929,0.00023121416,0.0000024521346,1.19135514e-7,0.0000030692663,0.00022963848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984845,0.00034517626,0.00022808585,0.000087640256,0.0003471191,0.00050748384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988346,0.00021834883,0.0003467545,0.000057802616,0.00051145366,0.00003101928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028303647,0.000069885755,0.00021437727,0.00002256288,0.00041855787,0.000011779401,0.00015992453,0.000051688312,0.000011093819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039004927,0.00004385591,0.00009452755,0.00014739753,0.0010272221,0.00014958662,0.000015242431,0.00042038359,8.2589787e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084172905,0.000014725529,0.0021129076,0.000004029738,0.000082035855,3.3169037e-8,0.013674796,0.0000063560396,0.00009199409,0.98277944,0.000010606319,0.001138891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027180156,0.0004978535,0.01999945,0.000055612512,0.0001665482,0.000017075672,0.19320536,0.00011962466,0.00019516653,0.77839047,0.0044655753,0.00016924321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022632588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04471321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20438898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010141005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007579964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9838758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260998728","doi":"","title":"A New Subtlety in Judicial Supremacy: Review of the 2003-2004 Constitutional Cases","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Parliament; Legitimacy; Constitution; Law of the case; Politics; High Court; Court of record; Margin of appreciation; Deference; Judicial review; Original jurisdiction; Fundamental rights; Human rights","score_opus":0.020062741181044154,"score_gpt":0.3097946944180742,"score_spread":0.28973195323703005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260998728","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25143486,0.61605626,0.0017691771,0.10331284,0.0022332512,0.002457994,0.00002653308,0.0000859475,0.0226231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9118713,0.08641255,0.000101293714,0.00047875842,0.00050405954,0.0000048419515,8.819268e-7,0.000004735251,0.00062157266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974712,0.00021032046,0.00035956936,0.00013162896,0.0006059665,0.0012213001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993117,0.000058203033,0.00021252355,0.000085045926,0.0002497311,0.00008281769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001668966,0.00011893969,0.0002514794,0.000029324023,0.00066324073,0.000022196877,0.00035619864,0.000066619825,0.000121553916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016557068,0.00007801032,0.00014992346,0.00066478684,0.0007240325,0.0001808313,0.000045130473,0.0009866196,0.000013443931],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016808368,0.000057928028,0.009718778,0.00004431174,0.000085811334,0.0000054810025,0.0017480373,0.00003953553,0.000031045212,0.9831903,0.0015207864,0.0035411508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007014905,0.00047806007,0.035260882,0.010455227,0.00046527776,0.0013848757,0.026103036,0.0000018989363,0.00029643197,0.62240136,0.29486173,0.0012762857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017541543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053401783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66043645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028015054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013868814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99172163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262016348","doi":"","title":"The Puzzle of Interlocking Power Hierarchies: Sharing the Pieces of Jurisdictional Authority","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Law and economics; Multiculturalism; Citizenship; Political science; Politics; Jurisdiction; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.01294857069043029,"score_gpt":0.2937266258044696,"score_spread":0.2807780551140393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262016348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96483094,0.006851999,0.00009620645,0.011349797,0.00034173095,0.00016708653,0.0000033150086,0.000021316808,0.016337596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867806,0.008508298,0.000020972157,0.000017479828,0.00032834464,0.0000041557305,2.833346e-7,0.0000059661584,0.0043339133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768025,0.00022175953,0.000340151,0.000118432436,0.00055930024,0.0010801238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992066,0.00027736346,0.00021352248,0.00011093485,0.00014835226,0.000043202603],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033111102,0.00009723274,0.00015547416,0.000023750816,0.0026551138,0.00007493441,0.00066902227,0.000051895007,0.0002051538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018934625,0.000050919003,0.00016875267,0.00021868407,0.0006073027,0.00018778624,0.000060534992,0.0010826879,0.0000067762057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018604632,0.00014020386,0.021121822,0.0000101182695,0.00093095924,0.0000010102111,0.1164426,0.00013803801,0.00017156637,0.6941359,0.0009604536,0.16576128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078290113,0.00040667143,0.03392192,0.0001369806,0.0001259702,0.000044758664,0.20665467,0.0001514191,0.0002245602,0.40280345,0.35435766,0.00038904021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019886792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015122654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3533972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003926204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047779354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262701805","doi":"10.59962/9780774856010-016","title":"Dignity, Equality, and Second Generation Rights","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Political science; Jurisprudence; Social equality; Legislation; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.05074252311571753,"score_gpt":0.24354064730427483,"score_spread":0.1927981241885573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262701805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8186326,0.00010936541,0.000013521766,0.000032506636,0.00006839814,0.00020065474,0.000057417245,0.00004531413,0.1808402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8763744,0.0001551712,0.00025871315,0.000018554383,0.00007061631,3.6866982e-7,0.0000036761335,0.0000026806674,0.1231158],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991245,0.00016255303,0.00009225903,0.00019005474,0.00025665067,0.0001739366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995412,0.000046089048,0.00007793454,0.0000696326,0.00016861706,0.00009651922],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015025718,0.000046055502,0.00015793787,0.000008618882,0.001684013,0.000089307396,0.00015147409,0.00009037112,0.00016398764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022084878,0.00009225597,0.00004869635,0.000018175766,0.00097590877,0.00018566463,0.00014386307,0.000076020166,0.000001724983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005618662,0.00048825753,0.053026333,0.00028350286,0.0006721506,0.0007256165,0.31244925,0.0000071018394,0.00214612,0.01657715,0.5623908,0.051177528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012452261,0.000062510095,0.15060997,0.00005681775,0.00006127806,0.000019728588,0.004524038,0.000031954365,0.00008029545,0.00070911454,0.8421766,0.00042245944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8160903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3079252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006199191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003372328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262938555","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004264","title":"The Religious Beliefs of Tort Victims: Religious Thin Skulls or Failures of Mitigation?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Argument (complex analysis); Tort; Religious freedom; Witness; Law; Accident (philosophy); Psychology; Forensic engineering; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Medicine; Engineering; Philosophy; Liability; Epistemology","score_opus":0.015367179004416462,"score_gpt":0.3090928702814286,"score_spread":0.29372569127701215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262938555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93223953,0.024390036,0.00010142615,0.018414369,0.0019067413,0.0006787802,0.00005058075,0.000028080982,0.022190478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99554896,0.002503608,0.00084001804,0.00028385755,0.0003804776,0.000001981018,5.002294e-7,0.000011851036,0.0004287264],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974084,0.00016379385,0.00090714305,0.00014897835,0.0008166784,0.00055501354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964668,0.0008054242,0.0008418683,0.00020471273,0.0011079529,0.00057325023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021724456,0.00015901674,0.00036933986,0.00008024946,0.0010666292,0.00009043307,0.00085560256,0.00015082234,0.000039629827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013668943,0.0001031202,0.00019656202,0.00039612624,0.00173528,0.00028357314,0.000029027715,0.00031786138,0.0000085490465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044624787,0.00014979737,0.05514239,0.000205036,0.00097531365,0.0012070267,0.5580769,0.00037215665,0.0027357964,0.19569875,0.17586942,0.009121148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064574333,0.0004625564,0.021483187,0.0006629884,0.0001321798,0.00007496735,0.034436177,0.0000027154224,0.005229016,0.0047636083,0.93167704,0.00042984204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24033414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7338968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7558076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042773422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015327699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82037574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263805740","doi":"","title":"Protecting the Right to Privacy when Examining Issues Affecting the life and Ministry of Clerics and Religious","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia canonica","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Christian ministry; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03202987271166426,"score_gpt":0.31359575638326387,"score_spread":0.2815658836715996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263805740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94773567,0.0044261925,9.954838e-7,0.017571475,0.00007254164,0.0007937534,0.0000023756352,0.000041862437,0.029355118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971526,0.0011025688,0.00039514378,0.00026719773,0.00026728955,0.000058375972,1.392446e-7,0.000009214042,0.0007474236],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851716,0.00040695924,0.00021287746,0.00024566735,0.00030352297,0.00031380457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984543,0.0011118297,0.00010781122,0.00016563626,0.00006993862,0.000090488335],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012417384,0.00013151392,0.00022658214,0.00001085054,0.0025851405,0.00010863731,0.0002536646,0.000057094912,0.000036255253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001993926,0.000071542905,0.00003162216,0.0002047782,0.00052168657,0.00007106915,0.00021458995,0.00025550532,0.000004145678],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000358101,0.00003138883,0.017139096,0.000049256905,0.00019078991,0.000004547491,0.955036,0.000008921346,0.00038284925,0.0010582596,0.005634478,0.0204286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000517234,0.00024400481,0.1083634,0.00015474635,0.00011779794,0.0000044566978,0.22865291,0.000003556891,0.0002748943,0.00024190772,0.66102046,0.00040461286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0080358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025351457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7263831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048638103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023980705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264166610","doi":"","title":"Uncertainty and Indecision in the Legal Regulation of Children: The Albertan Experience","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Ambivalence; Legislature; Political science; Context (archaeology); Common law; Law; Economic Justice; Narrative; Test (biology); Perception; Welfare; Psychology; Social psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.01211639601987992,"score_gpt":0.3042471047610696,"score_spread":0.2921307087411897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264166610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99246556,0.0015823598,0.00015266427,0.00393227,0.00006353033,0.00019175216,2.269141e-7,0.000004321771,0.0016072957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980685,0.0014088046,0.000015293514,0.00008286481,0.00019236197,0.0000023975147,3.625255e-7,0.0000029756557,0.00022642456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980367,0.00023989621,0.00024215748,0.00010483742,0.00050198275,0.0008744271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933195,0.0003383287,0.00014800759,0.00008085119,0.00007131176,0.00002956488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005098138,0.00007682219,0.00010178305,0.000030688712,0.0008990731,0.00006183577,0.0003165083,0.00005617319,0.000009961058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039309126,0.000037953563,0.000047598875,0.00029197035,0.00038296738,0.0002160739,0.000029309365,0.0007164357,9.709848e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012836495,0.00007662172,0.11939419,0.0000014892238,0.00006458036,0.0000014311101,0.22551642,0.00010272315,0.00044178023,0.5723983,0.00010871804,0.08176536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048744454,0.00011955292,0.7077314,0.00002067771,0.000015405345,0.000056366058,0.24213964,0.000023324812,0.00006517974,0.045470443,0.0037403556,0.00013016794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011379416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10478264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58833724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045002016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024140177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265349050","doi":"","title":"Reproductive Choice in Canadian Courts: An Evidence-Based Call for a Move to Relational Autonomy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Harm; Norm (philosophy); Politics; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.03793885685121873,"score_gpt":0.33635547178888564,"score_spread":0.2984166149376669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265349050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7500216,0.003753038,0.0016433928,0.2395047,0.0004349859,0.001921148,0.000014879983,0.00007220218,0.00263409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949594,0.0001455724,0.0008850054,0.0012040619,0.000992638,0.000035293157,0.0000034008858,0.000008595515,0.0017660107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99650556,0.00020624994,0.00026794107,0.00033372547,0.00035975847,0.002326737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988025,0.00023507005,0.00011329763,0.00011515299,0.00035046702,0.0003835458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036157016,0.00013643908,0.00018356819,0.00013723907,0.001038405,0.00009193409,0.00028545488,0.000100363555,0.000023033608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028473178,0.00012388121,0.00008561393,0.00030666176,0.000078784105,0.0006806343,0.000007330962,0.0008116503,0.000010913796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041331322,0.00030941705,0.092825904,0.000008301929,0.00021150742,0.000012684095,0.06189801,0.0065935315,0.00032720435,0.7587483,0.0026531457,0.07599871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002029004,0.0017535159,0.5347351,0.00022908577,0.000083362655,0.000016949987,0.019141156,0.00077986275,0.000058685124,0.16572879,0.27437437,0.0010701277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4971065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9458192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5930195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013943256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013679442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99191207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265808246","doi":"10.1080/17521483.2010.11423777","title":"Lord Atkin's Opinion in <i>Donoghue v Stevenson</i> : Perspectives from Biblical Hermeneutics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Humanities","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Hermeneutics; Law; Philosophy; Theology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.0441147463482948,"score_gpt":0.30852626711882497,"score_spread":0.26441152077053015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265808246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8732753,0.0007271918,3.123059e-7,0.00234219,0.00063118857,0.00015441215,0.000020477826,0.00007054422,0.12277841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962464,0.00090319576,0.00010372769,0.0005286722,0.0009652484,0.000016734472,0.000004420366,0.000007980704,0.0012236453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991198,0.00008222851,0.00013051316,0.00020426897,0.00020475328,0.00025839492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959266,0.00016071212,0.000039679795,0.000079426456,0.00007181356,0.000055707125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015507551,0.00011519675,0.00017022742,0.000039890652,0.00088637625,0.00021979559,0.00013020237,0.00010638826,0.00024146627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004465447,0.00009896458,0.00003895088,0.00009789704,0.0011490311,0.00027803404,0.000073623145,0.00025833637,0.000014334207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007070756,0.000039062597,0.0025245813,0.000006777878,0.000013362936,0.0000013229944,0.19826582,1.5467545e-7,0.00015107193,0.7982072,0.0005432812,0.00024025489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031926142,0.000034118755,0.026808282,0.000024593119,0.00000946797,3.2473665e-7,0.18732004,0.000003441238,0.00006160496,0.02229773,0.76288736,0.00023375635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044150434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20002341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7759095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051260093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020671023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96221465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265918590","doi":"","title":"Federalism and Pregnancy Benefits: Dividing Women","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Federalism; Political science; Law; Legislation; Politics","score_opus":0.018621485966484108,"score_gpt":0.29047708947598705,"score_spread":0.27185560350950294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265918590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96567714,0.024051769,0.00024176689,0.0026478006,0.00024149679,0.00015268078,8.2441517e-7,0.000057159978,0.0069293776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976545,0.02022436,0.00006540366,0.00009053622,0.00042596526,0.000004963442,3.1971996e-7,0.000010714106,0.0026327455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961511,0.00008915737,0.00021634765,0.00016568428,0.0003935149,0.0029841994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946344,0.000113007474,0.00008650784,0.00005235645,0.00009760818,0.00018706173],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029663732,0.00012758444,0.00016439614,0.000044216307,0.0023193082,0.00017816374,0.00019159497,0.00008890424,0.000031357624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002510586,0.00010253457,0.00005550378,0.00016515434,0.00016555155,0.0003578025,0.000056607638,0.0008945084,0.000009882311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021917882,0.000048200516,0.022865709,0.000007938323,0.00022430309,0.0000073811616,0.07928848,0.000003183078,0.00015781642,0.66956633,0.0000808339,0.22772789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023394083,0.0005730904,0.06911991,0.00039174996,0.00008164992,0.00011582291,0.5300811,0.0000057903576,0.00015070524,0.32999194,0.06601276,0.0011360849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013160072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015464375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4507926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022288873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038235154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266116478","doi":"","title":"Critical Comparisons: The Supreme Court of Canada Dooms Section 15","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Plaintiff; Political science; Section (typography); Charter; Immigration; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.014170470897597895,"score_gpt":0.28498565594200975,"score_spread":0.2708151850444119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266116478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.848388,0.015103938,0.0018091289,0.09933524,0.0024773458,0.00047281175,0.000011249561,0.000070818016,0.032331448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962008,0.0004596085,0.000029961402,0.00006620513,0.001081005,0.000003786989,8.321969e-7,0.000006334983,0.0021514418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711794,0.0002591254,0.00027343858,0.00010787823,0.0006833577,0.0015582814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919677,0.0002687933,0.00012079452,0.00007043869,0.00028150697,0.000061719686],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014790402,0.00010052939,0.00017589696,0.000016501093,0.001796306,0.00006246871,0.00027124232,0.000063184,0.00006213961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039860266,0.000065522814,0.00008450322,0.00017641115,0.0003659599,0.00015025461,0.000024721623,0.0010675283,0.0000026237615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044917066,0.00014722752,0.026453514,0.0000100246425,0.00021090727,0.0000034350762,0.0047042165,0.00025926548,0.00037194288,0.8793302,0.0868622,0.0016021578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011471435,0.00030522025,0.07206938,0.00006524011,0.00023185491,0.00010908732,0.2650892,0.0002546983,0.00039391723,0.17109227,0.48853257,0.0007094058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7843271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99064064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70823795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023000264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032235598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266419907","doi":"","title":"Unnatural Intents: Willing and Acting in a New Natural Law Theory Sexual Ethic","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Constitution; Autonomy; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Natural (archaeology); Law; Natural law; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036383147947679134,"score_gpt":0.30724781300391785,"score_spread":0.27086466505623874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266419907","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97870654,0.012354938,0.00016530744,0.0029308319,0.00056353695,0.00019460224,3.7422015e-7,0.00006076188,0.0050231367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99499184,0.0019526246,0.00019814873,0.0002849832,0.0004531862,0.0000018612691,4.6495276e-7,0.000012853042,0.002104047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681014,0.00041884428,0.00026165624,0.00021610348,0.00033762923,0.0019556012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993736,0.00019258558,0.00015269368,0.000060756007,0.000088583,0.00013174831],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032562993,0.00016721447,0.00021042381,0.00005665096,0.0010058436,0.00010111442,0.00028016974,0.00014634474,0.000024808756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005893706,0.00012710303,0.000062824016,0.00018931954,0.00035204447,0.0006469449,0.00007790662,0.0034872964,0.000007783696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010700751,0.000027550735,0.007878325,0.000005128272,0.00014398007,0.000008043954,0.12165583,8.423962e-7,0.00018842694,0.82742685,0.000021203043,0.04253684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011838794,0.00018583794,0.008963735,0.000102294565,0.000056185512,0.00008271273,0.41814837,0.000027065116,0.000061872226,0.5674249,0.0032768748,0.00048628866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022169534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17733689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29649255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011235254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081658654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266724630","doi":"","title":"The Contribution to Private Law of Justice La Forest","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Private law; Political science; Public law","score_opus":0.015989414447934572,"score_gpt":0.2725423216316211,"score_spread":0.25655290718368656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266724630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81236553,0.00031339342,0.00024745014,0.013115033,0.00014299164,0.0005273205,0.0000050230096,0.00003974324,0.17324352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963637,0.00024709984,0.00048700243,0.000029047902,0.000031320495,5.800778e-7,7.554254e-7,0.0000020336602,0.0028384668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932194,0.00012330514,0.000054433232,0.0000896603,0.0002241438,0.00018653077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922675,0.00023057652,0.00009618768,0.00009822719,0.00026950327,0.00007874768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002619478,0.000055671382,0.00012306793,0.000004060998,0.00094458077,0.000018994153,0.00027390392,0.000057548845,0.0008140286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018316176,0.00004667323,0.000057689664,0.00005006659,0.0005333523,0.00034782357,0.00011489369,0.000042805925,0.00003594019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047762052,0.00004100635,0.0023736972,0.000018590054,0.00007936936,0.0000010835449,0.08942771,0.000019233055,0.0010430448,0.8978317,0.0031249546,0.005991889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040860983,0.000074652766,0.64215875,0.00002778067,0.00008943466,1.0757337e-7,0.13913181,0.00004221851,0.000070942355,0.00035542925,0.2175033,0.00013692983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63875866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5375152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89747626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022999929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002113486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89130425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268469613","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2731","title":"Canadian Bijuralism At A Crossroad? The Impact Of Section 8.1 Of The Interpretation Act On Judicial Interpretation Of Federal Legislation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Judicial interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Section (typography); Common law; Supreme court; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.016204950788023396,"score_gpt":0.30857258504728,"score_spread":0.2923676342592566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268469613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9100724,0.0000469206,0.00016869532,0.002378273,0.0007339113,0.000266956,0.000014153242,0.000008111112,0.08631057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994796,0.000019573192,0.000028981218,0.000077272896,0.0002818357,0.0000033263982,0.0000027007939,0.000007662793,0.00009904324],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981692,0.0006042866,0.0004099152,0.00010533983,0.00048308526,0.00022817032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849486,0.00020715648,0.00069245306,0.000114221555,0.00040591243,0.00008537321],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093630323,0.00011724872,0.00021381726,0.00005063827,0.0014777639,0.00008693518,0.00027128265,0.00010473478,0.00007142869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051378354,0.000064035245,0.00029297237,0.00018288713,0.0004209586,0.00032370456,0.000033922333,0.00025671953,0.000002252162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015689629,0.00026341662,0.13318713,0.000062588944,0.001021216,0.0000017692048,0.5595169,0.04362594,0.017861564,0.19900729,0.0037236244,0.040159594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020333794,0.00129691,0.9205168,0.0008477679,0.00022218218,0.00002799568,0.01519047,0.020480918,0.005500449,0.03152691,0.0017970339,0.0005592017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8980033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95912105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7873297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093818584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016645897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269071924","doi":"","title":"Foetal Rights and the Regulation of Abortion","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Abortion; Supreme court; Argument (complex analysis); Assertion; Reproductive rights; Human rights; Normative; Medicine","score_opus":0.011872409440713215,"score_gpt":0.26911393259655997,"score_spread":0.25724152315584675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269071924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98993236,0.0029552698,0.00019346921,0.0030111407,0.000096714306,0.00012878866,2.798112e-7,0.000011898253,0.0036700584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931482,0.0045079133,0.000029977355,0.000013845841,0.0002500067,0.000002005206,3.296458e-7,0.0000023351163,0.002045355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987349,0.00018504472,0.00015466721,0.00006480214,0.00029156095,0.0005690383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996027,0.00007562891,0.00014425334,0.000037664777,0.00011099068,0.000028766426],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012941569,0.00005322493,0.00010839509,0.000016881444,0.0014427368,0.000015128846,0.000090665315,0.00004037317,0.000014895381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000107570784,0.0000295124,0.00005995435,0.000102683145,0.0006310528,0.00017778791,0.000012870662,0.00036948474,0.0000028890433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000809348,0.00001991564,0.0036552304,0.000001603809,0.000110580775,4.2985752e-7,0.028181987,0.000009075422,0.0002014339,0.9636849,0.00017054181,0.0038833495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023398928,0.00012765797,0.116222136,0.000017931314,0.00007834847,0.000120192126,0.016736781,0.00006756406,0.00016982887,0.8518959,0.012039424,0.00018434157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036782704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008610393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1125669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002990559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026925822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269197009","doi":"","title":"Rethinking the Sex Discrimination Act - Does Canada’s Experience Suggest We Should Give Our Judges a Greater Role?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Legislation; Legitimacy; Political science; Charter; Law; Power (physics); Politics","score_opus":0.024504832253950767,"score_gpt":0.30063863056275797,"score_spread":0.2761337983088072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269197009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8918067,0.0005808567,0.000019379917,0.103714496,0.0008885186,0.00022379322,0.0000030304066,0.000042325693,0.0027208705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917922,0.0014848034,0.000030530893,0.00028023706,0.0011145584,0.000019072402,0.000001342602,0.000014551168,0.005262719],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964287,0.00027128824,0.0002440074,0.00024511022,0.00088607793,0.0019247874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921703,0.00011552838,0.00020584908,0.00015237174,0.00018586048,0.00012336769],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017730125,0.00019930676,0.00018695388,0.00003043571,0.0032324255,0.0002902506,0.00066482945,0.00013060271,0.00006194246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049675506,0.000102357044,0.000100373574,0.0001483888,0.00023411315,0.0004489895,0.00008072733,0.0025831088,0.0000056398453],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043632634,0.000055933924,0.0824237,0.000009221367,0.00029357508,0.00001682975,0.77905303,0.000010699242,0.002998236,0.09978495,0.0019360328,0.033374153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003240036,0.00006571408,0.027922377,0.000028465614,0.00007055132,0.000055969984,0.85798365,0.000023247714,0.0007715038,0.06642199,0.045894057,0.00043845066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5166763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9905899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4739136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018749174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029196793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269209814","doi":"","title":"Harmonizing Family Law's Identities","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Law; Harmonization; Political science; Municipal law; Private law; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Comparative law; Legislature; Domestic relations; Sociology","score_opus":0.051444160924537644,"score_gpt":0.28702093795182565,"score_spread":0.23557677702728802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269209814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6196844,0.05672256,0.0004524254,0.014334228,0.00148372,0.00033464486,0.000002990781,0.00028035115,0.3067047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9476024,0.026502049,0.00006538398,0.0003323085,0.00091120263,0.0000052099895,3.4259932e-7,0.000013188115,0.024567913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964451,0.00018556154,0.00022611787,0.00015718394,0.00056293263,0.0024230669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948454,0.00006839544,0.0001216475,0.00007562125,0.00013823909,0.00011157941],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013176235,0.00013645136,0.00017523464,0.000038408794,0.002571602,0.0002753489,0.00035620082,0.000082468716,0.00022321608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014643205,0.000114626564,0.00014897544,0.0001808059,0.0003302949,0.00058986153,0.000045943772,0.0012124388,0.0002695573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049709092,0.000043759246,0.0010795959,0.000003141732,0.00017605376,0.000008565382,0.020141877,0.0000048412367,0.00022836108,0.96345276,0.0036697197,0.011186378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010594828,0.00020197548,0.0020165152,0.000050224462,0.000111975816,0.000091635906,0.26565745,0.00004261155,0.000066312714,0.3769226,0.35303417,0.0007450277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043341094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012444946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58653015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001662767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002167208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270263469","doi":"","title":"Matters of Faith and Conscience: A Turning Point in the Taking of Oaths in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Oath; Faith; Law; Protestantism; Supreme court; Political science; Legal culture; Diversity (politics); Immigration; Sociology; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016930478786124695,"score_gpt":0.2727619995685596,"score_spread":0.25583152078243493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270263469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98476213,0.00035323133,0.0000010926332,0.008575676,0.000053752636,0.00019450657,0.0000033297215,0.0000048963593,0.0060513867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99822634,0.000037138812,0.00017754,0.0015014859,0.000021604632,0.000004450035,2.94756e-7,0.0000018492882,0.00002929707],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987729,0.0001769456,0.0002444622,0.00014185757,0.00040257678,0.00026122364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945444,0.00021452729,0.00015541754,0.00008117028,0.000042549967,0.000051917905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007647944,0.00007788275,0.00019548995,0.00002458491,0.00019902445,0.000032148535,0.00023890958,0.00003142794,0.000037217254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036143052,0.000053500367,0.000023393603,0.00032749886,0.00034124657,0.00017715743,0.000031693915,0.00016521761,7.327387e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037832997,0.0001024565,0.69945526,0.00007381835,0.000025156063,0.00005572447,0.21083945,0.0003139445,0.0072293216,0.0746675,0.0021753663,0.005024194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043480648,0.000035793433,0.88749695,0.00017118952,0.0000071204577,0.0000013951804,0.10715738,0.00003306524,0.00035784065,0.00094108534,0.0032038742,0.00015950623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.971768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98496574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18804172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025851186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023570728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21816817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270347424","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2636513","title":"Illegitimacy in British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Ontario, and Nova Scotia: A Legislative History","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Legislature; Nova (rocket); Legislative history; Geography; Political science; Archaeology; History; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.025459100449071626,"score_gpt":0.2648203596074508,"score_spread":0.2393612591583792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270347424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9494634,0.013812999,0.0000325798,0.0017045804,0.00059054093,0.00031654513,0.0000017553189,0.00003621291,0.034041375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9509388,0.0017740009,0.00013651467,0.00016230694,0.00034087524,0.000005411716,0.000001355881,0.000013788295,0.04662693],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681985,0.00024881025,0.00028407283,0.00025254404,0.0005092552,0.0018854566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992042,0.000065412,0.00015810924,0.00006663693,0.0002808588,0.00022478224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002260639,0.00011804999,0.00028808194,0.00003755558,0.00040698025,0.00024960938,0.00022246875,0.00011941752,0.00032345948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034947187,0.0001625036,0.000067308334,0.00017341593,0.00051207095,0.00057774095,0.00006536551,0.0017121338,0.000021746291],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048005084,0.00021882332,0.48088217,0.0000067292954,0.00030246965,0.00010800528,0.43687385,0.000008054146,0.000016996104,0.0042300266,0.028443495,0.04886137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028587044,0.00032604637,0.08041203,0.00007881314,0.000052233627,0.00023837433,0.4057284,0.0000041993394,5.197786e-7,0.044506352,0.4652206,0.00057372946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9823132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4367771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01890571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0108993985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270740614","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2196616","title":"Consultation Paper on Assisted Living in British Columbia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Assisted living; Geography; Medicine; Library science; Gerontology; Computer science","score_opus":0.015941946634757464,"score_gpt":0.28343043445676785,"score_spread":0.2674884878220104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270740614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883979,0.0024279894,0.00001631475,0.001053732,0.00032457523,0.00016364027,0.0000010030227,0.00003488122,0.0075799697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98983496,0.003222603,0.000032834298,0.00018074621,0.0005043729,0.000010004064,8.3118215e-7,0.000009247092,0.0062043704],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693745,0.00034877003,0.00021317441,0.00011219526,0.00037932047,0.0020090835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935514,0.00028215538,0.000116121235,0.000041518273,0.00009991569,0.00010516091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025731383,0.00006820616,0.00014168372,0.000022484055,0.0010250256,0.00029471013,0.00013836882,0.000091594826,0.00024344077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00138268,0.000089628666,0.000063920445,0.0002333491,0.00011687434,0.00052988704,0.000019599649,0.0009990497,0.000045055764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001491841,0.00045977085,0.76986635,0.0000068529002,0.00016652264,0.00000671987,0.039132953,0.0000074756986,0.00021532894,0.027237423,0.002254644,0.16063106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044962254,0.000068646645,0.913274,0.00009081499,0.000017561058,0.000036711892,0.06601492,0.000002189064,0.0000011529594,0.0044962945,0.015347719,0.00020034664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09496591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8557349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76076895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002344958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049371616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9110608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271674268","doi":"","title":"Complicating Culture in Child Placement Decisions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Welfare; Multiculturalism; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Political science; Agency (philosophy); Ideology; Work (physics); Essentialism; Child protection; Gender studies; Law; Social science; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.02069029042547685,"score_gpt":0.321439722719164,"score_spread":0.3007494322936871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271674268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8685315,0.01505805,0.0033541205,0.04450022,0.00048660618,0.0008731009,0.00000412733,0.00014696663,0.06704529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98988664,0.008447414,0.00041845877,0.00015804767,0.00034546314,0.000010855529,0.0000013922562,0.000008177376,0.00072352984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709696,0.000111080466,0.00026547126,0.00017509602,0.0004501961,0.0019012201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954456,0.00005916701,0.00012343157,0.00007872252,0.00008849663,0.00010561106],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014552684,0.00012343982,0.00016586788,0.00004619961,0.0017209614,0.000085286025,0.00033960203,0.00008190749,0.000026310052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043458448,0.00009360721,0.00009471625,0.00031759957,0.00012588003,0.00019387237,0.00005307517,0.001593612,0.000052084215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030711126,0.00022688208,0.005425317,0.0000022249583,0.00012871235,0.000009710695,0.05826051,0.0012953561,0.00014745581,0.9197303,0.0002868023,0.014455993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041568093,0.0003729928,0.017219763,0.00034625805,0.00005255205,0.00021407915,0.37838003,0.000013183751,0.000065611246,0.51256293,0.08583155,0.00078426395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027186796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05231238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4071674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003924997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007402708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272022239","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1411151","title":"Spousal Support in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.010898857132370097,"score_gpt":0.28061960495462207,"score_spread":0.26972074782225197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272022239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9703434,0.0009911312,0.000100515135,0.0035528017,0.0004937117,0.0001201374,0.0000011244055,0.000015210823,0.024381977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99453706,0.0016235207,0.000028240467,0.00019221484,0.00044866372,0.0000011687457,7.570179e-7,0.000007174893,0.0031611954],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996029,0.00008293565,0.0002557165,0.00011951866,0.00053015153,0.0029826788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955606,0.00009052408,0.00009222231,0.000048960203,0.000076813245,0.00013544239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033766604,0.00009696971,0.00014642849,0.000041239055,0.00054391,0.000031133808,0.0002542192,0.00005127813,0.00013182197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019237514,0.00008148901,0.000049032027,0.00024019738,0.00008030656,0.0001594721,0.00002390989,0.0012168655,0.00001893908],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100443336,0.00008636344,0.62774575,0.0000051971524,0.00018141756,0.00022814074,0.01801842,0.000030972064,0.00011910706,0.2665531,0.0030958427,0.08383526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014368402,0.00018442552,0.27942055,0.000022337892,0.00003151155,0.00013984919,0.44222674,0.000005314495,0.000078477744,0.041220754,0.23455863,0.000674564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9817286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99986386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4242083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013354779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013637413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9919543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272219748","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002460","title":"Unconstitutionality, Invalidity, and Charter Challenges","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Morality; Positivism; Legal positivism; Law; Duty; Political science; Politics; Constitutionality; Sociology; Law and economics; Constitution; Legal realism; Legal profession","score_opus":0.11902694100008154,"score_gpt":0.3161608745964075,"score_spread":0.19713393359632597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272219748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39464176,0.08669379,0.000026731173,0.1736014,0.0026817664,0.00045260135,0.000060230777,0.000043305343,0.34179842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942785,0.0040321243,0.00015150443,0.00058696856,0.0005000618,0.0000017988226,2.1560662e-7,0.000004403778,0.00044445522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998747,0.0001550662,0.00024925414,0.00013011282,0.00036727844,0.00035127148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864525,0.0001259101,0.00014674786,0.000079843616,0.00028884757,0.0007133918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006450185,0.000106669955,0.00020270237,0.000049273727,0.0010180206,0.00014245154,0.00029925423,0.00008964889,0.0004955576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002995362,0.00009070475,0.000069669215,0.00008992768,0.0015210217,0.0005134839,0.000022732556,0.00021816368,0.000042643947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003010507,0.000026421634,0.011799196,0.00003194334,0.000081409446,0.00027977678,0.057541214,0.0000043298337,0.000025697978,0.90996647,0.013817773,0.006422782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002249458,0.00005132211,0.012657117,0.0001278539,0.000030251374,0.000069591995,0.003022873,0.000002945488,0.000024545197,0.0050211023,0.9785642,0.00020323295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053166896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45542774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9647465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002490607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026470164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9531382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272295218","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2273757","title":"From Empire Ontario to California North: Law and Legal Institutions in Twentieth-Century Ontario","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Law; Legal history; Political science; History","score_opus":0.023039803689051196,"score_gpt":0.28620472000867136,"score_spread":0.2631649163196202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272295218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9806175,0.0010368865,0.000056439145,0.0042200997,0.00045753203,0.00024267161,0.000008195473,0.00002850094,0.013332152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99303484,0.0016746428,0.00014095195,0.0005006602,0.0004339239,0.000010886407,0.000008972823,0.000008778275,0.004186341],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969889,0.0001229996,0.00031138415,0.00027234564,0.0004273509,0.0018770265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943763,0.0000415415,0.00009163077,0.000094439565,0.00009089977,0.0002438429],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065961736,0.00018399683,0.00025044283,0.000060803166,0.0015326457,0.00020526486,0.00026599798,0.00011116092,0.00017895646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006944511,0.00015872734,0.000091793685,0.000257033,0.00023448563,0.0004689833,0.000066841654,0.0018442628,0.000062805746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011390712,0.00018165914,0.74040854,0.0000016482877,0.00021224232,0.000072469375,0.103033096,0.00005811041,0.000028211804,0.15158595,0.00038709544,0.0039170943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006593564,0.00008335177,0.15066235,0.000027632152,0.00003736636,0.000033286156,0.016754387,6.951565e-7,0.0000013190177,0.009100069,0.8223737,0.00026652662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98188657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99994326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82198656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010339309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004348484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273006933","doi":"","title":"L’Accès À La Justice Des Enfants Et Leur Droit De Participation Devant Les Tribunaux: Quelques Réflexion (Access to Justice for Children and Their Right to Participate in Court: Few Thoughts)","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Art","score_opus":0.03696434733967204,"score_gpt":0.3683390654112594,"score_spread":0.33137471807158736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273006933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93108773,0.0071549644,0.041180838,0.018616062,0.00043425924,0.0009947615,0.00003448214,0.000050764364,0.0004461281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843638,0.011699313,0.00078951335,0.0009435571,0.0011755781,0.00014281746,0.0000071553654,0.000042331856,0.0008359441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99333405,0.0016751796,0.00065867184,0.00049824495,0.0003895406,0.003444311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747485,0.0012270837,0.00031240226,0.00014110899,0.00035609928,0.0004884543],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007470845,0.00041447987,0.00055829575,0.00013023523,0.0017324544,0.0005949199,0.00053627347,0.00024957786,0.000020040197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025225235,0.00033221897,0.00014271328,0.0005563554,0.00036375131,0.001069205,0.00016660307,0.0011771118,0.000019413941],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010701902,0.0007425871,0.03791405,0.0003498376,0.00072057085,0.0000074497175,0.13280955,0.0040520257,0.0007207008,0.47818744,0.0010628665,0.34236273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004375084,0.0025607643,0.3067863,0.0014206045,0.0026853506,0.00015857207,0.03647342,0.0046953373,0.0030104108,0.60839003,0.027422791,0.0020213146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008474886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1844092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34034142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002567929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008512503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W227303418","doi":"","title":"Introducing the Women's Court of Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Politics; Downtown; Poverty; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; History","score_opus":0.012400200402104024,"score_gpt":0.22125499699720752,"score_spread":0.2088547965951035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W227303418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41848075,0.0000035292646,0.000023245299,0.004393356,0.0002551504,0.00037257254,0.000015616635,0.00006170362,0.5763941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945014,0.0045834132,0.000133314,0.000079841586,0.00025946373,0.0000020827847,0.0000020553748,0.000007029122,0.00043139086],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986083,0.00019763084,0.00012434369,0.00020760689,0.0004211172,0.00044101098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999288,0.00017740378,0.00012383032,0.00016530475,0.00019459793,0.00005081477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003159019,0.000118633274,0.00017859816,0.00041683667,0.000996674,0.000029320394,0.0004130229,0.000053970878,0.00005783498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016085675,0.00009124263,0.00005811774,0.0034105924,0.00032270144,0.0001827006,0.000120861776,0.00014030025,0.0000023935686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033445322,0.00063748617,0.028169315,0.00019987136,0.00082792895,0.00029318623,0.72932565,0.0014298317,0.00013662037,0.13120903,0.077479534,0.029957084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020793173,0.000015574162,0.0013646545,0.00000862143,0.000019558589,2.6989196e-7,0.03524972,0.0000121376,0.00008096683,0.0000020409402,0.9629179,0.00012061702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9970244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8854384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013690265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7665711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273228752","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198786429.003.0006","title":"Cohabitants, Choice, and the Public Interest","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Legislature; Balance (ability); Political science; Property (philosophy); Face (sociological concept); Law; Law reform; Family law; Principal (computer security); Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.04993836644928008,"score_gpt":0.2608547602049952,"score_spread":0.21091639375571514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273228752","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045164398,0.00034429558,0.0000063822354,0.0016864013,0.00038964982,0.00067813613,0.000053522566,0.00012447115,0.9962655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004134886,0.0013850369,0.00003715617,0.0001174587,0.0005673906,0.0000022892623,0.000009412927,0.000016643582,0.9937297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837464,0.0003505106,0.000141511,0.00036616,0.0003586583,0.0004085151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985441,0.00053595577,0.00022712103,0.00025818724,0.00026204105,0.00017259069],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042721312,0.00026176777,0.0003842573,0.00005164378,0.002062685,0.00023553797,0.0008470613,0.00036084125,0.000049912032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024264737,0.00019218655,0.00015888737,0.000022989456,0.004589534,0.00018854132,0.0007651449,0.0004153388,0.0000035790433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003652078,0.0000063071343,0.000046782978,0.000025972393,0.00020391008,0.000007774211,0.005212852,8.312997e-9,2.3889172e-7,0.89234865,0.10026733,0.0018436683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007884828,0.00001995336,0.00008439555,0.00006460965,0.00013545946,6.850969e-7,0.0015900239,0.0000023194154,6.668874e-7,0.00063011865,0.9964335,0.00024979038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013255156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010885587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89616615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047686705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020260195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273483782","doi":"","title":"Pregnant Women and the 'Born Alive' Rule in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Personhood; Tort; Autonomy; Political science; Duty; Liability; Appeal; Duty of care; Common law","score_opus":0.005688272313574033,"score_gpt":0.2283428665690549,"score_spread":0.22265459425548087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273483782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97748303,0.009676033,0.000007018833,0.008498956,0.00011117424,0.00015918404,0.0000013863565,0.0000069562457,0.0040562567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910804,0.0057884906,0.0000072577964,0.00010105664,0.00023189624,0.000014461207,3.2909114e-7,0.0000049698774,0.0027711296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973317,0.00025154924,0.00018123344,0.00010705057,0.00034016825,0.0017883042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963546,0.00012538722,0.0000903734,0.000047159505,0.000046428577,0.00005518348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001710517,0.00008922675,0.0001566706,0.000016502434,0.00083641394,0.000067088156,0.0001989917,0.00003094067,0.00002400831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010060945,0.0000521868,0.000030284393,0.00013817722,0.00023922301,0.000116098876,0.000033735505,0.00071195967,0.0000024536785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019731266,0.00008877466,0.21314663,0.000011481858,0.00029756996,0.000029137898,0.06399506,0.00016705574,0.000054683,0.6727933,0.0017819369,0.04743705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033749999,0.000060461796,0.12212665,0.000046925186,0.000026616342,0.00004159428,0.28357804,0.00003757461,0.00001102509,0.55322343,0.037074793,0.00039787212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98542297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21958297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00648113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004084882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274679933","doi":"10.32597/dmin/50/","title":"Trinitarian Leadership as a Seventh-day Adventist Perspective on Empowering Leadership in Local Churches in Western Ontario","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Teamwork; Local church; Leadership development; Church Growth; Vocational education; Empowerment; Seventh day adventist; Authentic leadership; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Management; Psychology; Theology; Pedagogy; Law","score_opus":0.14194183785986628,"score_gpt":0.35939792613963206,"score_spread":0.21745608827976579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274679933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7237738,0.00075676554,0.0000044436256,0.0058710612,0.0013410844,0.0016742294,0.0000036864992,0.00013434303,0.26644063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76059043,0.00004363028,0.000024565139,0.00021394057,0.00017427227,0.00018747147,0.0000611437,0.000035331836,0.23866919],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959975,0.00054655696,0.0005925047,0.0008630214,0.00089491665,0.0011055034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998655,0.0005171582,0.000246165,0.00020074275,0.000184058,0.0001968278],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009021612,0.00055623136,0.0007537154,0.00032001644,0.0004401986,0.0002265557,0.00053191994,0.0007661895,0.0015202225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000759963,0.0005126362,0.00026087798,0.00046846425,0.0003697858,0.0004579486,0.00004284566,0.0014769578,0.0006373434],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000202558,0.00030318537,0.021936491,0.0001300353,0.00011576206,0.00007360215,0.9660391,0.000028996681,0.000012096271,0.008229355,0.00046413467,0.0024646574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062684866,0.000092306174,0.2613844,0.00064410747,0.00002269839,3.8192601e-7,0.7331039,0.0000023193284,0.000051308398,0.00027002738,0.0032679336,0.00053379167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8528979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23944789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073954863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061869517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276637496","doi":"","title":"Following Fisher : Ontario Spousal Support Trends 2008-09","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.015322794432625126,"score_gpt":0.29052446951486494,"score_spread":0.2752016750822398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276637496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7934028,0.0020111443,0.00011302772,0.02429426,0.0011914972,0.00017989735,0.0000014507,0.00016401512,0.17864193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8962473,0.0007209736,0.0000976418,0.00031556742,0.0007961431,0.0000025294535,0.000002999626,0.000011405904,0.1018054],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538165,0.00014419599,0.0003166062,0.00024292391,0.0007465084,0.0031681398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994188,0.000039607825,0.0001465918,0.00010652027,0.0000895094,0.00019895482],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019627614,0.00021023463,0.00029918997,0.00008010979,0.0016671955,0.0001833874,0.00040872188,0.0001422984,0.000855341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010948528,0.00017209508,0.00036396654,0.0003091592,0.00009346589,0.00053290976,0.000026608372,0.0017849401,0.0000952639],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019022965,0.00055680034,0.12164165,0.000003340475,0.0013417049,0.00021555254,0.13378492,0.000031264866,0.00034416353,0.14719181,0.0469884,0.5477102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018938566,0.000989484,0.12967828,0.000029246818,0.00022194709,0.000121346406,0.030891435,0.0000032132489,0.000019716703,0.062248033,0.7730178,0.0008856348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03952061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6042491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7260294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005020401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025441279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277137708","doi":"","title":"Battered Women Under Duress: The Supreme Court of Canada's Abandonment of Context and Purpose in R. v. Ryan","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; Laurentian University; University of Saskatchewan; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Abandonment (legal); Law; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Political science; High Court; Sociology; Criminology; History","score_opus":0.01815682813647744,"score_gpt":0.26182820609740615,"score_spread":0.2436713779609287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277137708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834319,0.004953184,0.000015686894,0.01068598,0.00009486374,0.00018164604,0.0000030257395,0.0000028382574,0.00063092186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99745244,0.0016361554,0.0000041492217,0.00010497274,0.00006885687,0.000006747443,3.0673692e-7,0.000003944414,0.00072244694],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783957,0.00023363327,0.00026263154,0.000091147085,0.0005151568,0.0010578356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941915,0.000103061786,0.00018238649,0.00006494521,0.0001243451,0.00010611649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002317177,0.00008801026,0.0002183875,0.000021980704,0.00022966905,0.00001990461,0.00021501082,0.000040772724,0.00001863407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018396655,0.000055725795,0.000030025614,0.00010503815,0.00027612876,0.00008808472,0.000042634187,0.00046496847,2.203472e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007253373,0.00040195062,0.28259388,0.00005087847,0.0013912946,0.000014745929,0.5234801,0.00048494857,0.0012059461,0.15713863,0.007190889,0.02532137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003476287,0.000376213,0.11306872,0.00006754388,0.000042804848,0.000025121613,0.816835,0.000027399916,0.0001860382,0.04740635,0.018187799,0.00030071638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48361495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95231843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46870345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026689232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029528113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6979141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279117559","doi":"","title":"R. v. Powley: Its Implications for the Metis and Other Aboriginal Peoples in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Political science; Geography; Ethnology; Genealogy; History; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02325128519662669,"score_gpt":0.3096805012467216,"score_spread":0.2864292160500949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279117559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8925079,0.0062809745,0.00006373515,0.08696237,0.0003876355,0.0014194543,0.00018658569,0.000061738574,0.012129584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99688065,0.00041136416,0.00038700405,0.0012400862,0.00019892074,0.00019764625,0.0000014724412,0.000008559261,0.00067427004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913436,0.000049435006,0.00014212853,0.00018520904,0.00017133365,0.0003175322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992845,0.00036021063,0.000050843926,0.00010814232,0.00008395133,0.00011233944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023393553,0.0000988154,0.0001326832,0.000009691548,0.0010416503,0.00008156254,0.00021713256,0.00004161943,0.0000716537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023342496,0.00006798428,0.000034529094,0.00017890029,0.00016454436,0.00014077751,0.000024494811,0.000107257874,0.000012006872],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010466178,0.000027018124,0.083477214,0.000018275756,0.000052472347,0.0000010489299,0.010379895,0.00009080932,0.00015072257,0.90142155,0.0034237956,0.0009467149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045282414,0.000011361587,0.25224242,0.000021295156,0.000021649306,6.83176e-7,0.0085062785,0.0000027397955,0.00007589562,0.002925416,0.7355739,0.00016551922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98881894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89849615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006519217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007607435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80116373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280046500","doi":"","title":"Developments in Family Law: The 2008-2009 Term - Just Divisions?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Family law; Unconscionability; Common law","score_opus":0.025646539604253726,"score_gpt":0.31748137290836337,"score_spread":0.29183483330410964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280046500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89168566,0.013334201,0.000058776768,0.022861212,0.000516787,0.00048649617,0.000002251665,0.00007491323,0.070979685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98789936,0.008307164,0.000054427022,0.0010377127,0.00031557257,0.000005121436,9.710451e-7,0.000006853376,0.0023728437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963824,0.0002626945,0.00030479993,0.00017767654,0.0005759694,0.0022964235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995038,0.00008679967,0.00012592653,0.0000943953,0.00009257347,0.000096526725],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022885648,0.00015684207,0.00018304415,0.000045310055,0.0020771353,0.00015773707,0.00054046576,0.00009226152,0.000017949593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016744934,0.00009774355,0.000093942304,0.0003391669,0.00020412881,0.00032594436,0.000043867563,0.001468851,0.00006343301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050113795,0.0002490416,0.019363558,0.0000023503808,0.00016201499,0.000019635267,0.046039216,0.000024089248,0.00041097542,0.7983526,0.0030700958,0.13225631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014408537,0.00025055883,0.6484962,0.000088297995,0.00004539492,0.000038598664,0.08105761,0.000004438909,0.000026845091,0.11670936,0.1512195,0.00062230416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035503218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038992446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68164325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001781975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010380921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281456330","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2263759","title":"A Simple Lawyer's Impressions of the Lex Mercatoria, and Certain Examples of Its Acceptance by the Canadian Judiciary","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Law; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.016963604728551584,"score_gpt":0.2904565858068526,"score_spread":0.273492981078301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281456330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9455423,0.025577558,0.000008225639,0.024003495,0.0001640754,0.0003415095,0.00003028778,0.000010065215,0.0043224925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993289,0.00560308,0.0000107456735,0.00014301065,0.00027600242,0.000005876662,5.920456e-7,0.0000070610154,0.00066466193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781483,0.0002942696,0.00023953845,0.000112576716,0.00038902982,0.0011497523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922395,0.00017905235,0.00022636895,0.00011028018,0.00014476056,0.00011556076],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013924793,0.00010266449,0.00017046547,0.00002165949,0.0020498286,0.00003893704,0.0004929164,0.000079905,0.00006237604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038685952,0.000055395623,0.000087393564,0.00021767213,0.00042462625,0.00017247457,0.000058395286,0.0007430286,0.0000014853878],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057098616,0.00016051345,0.075286366,0.000023911673,0.0009823237,0.0000010666007,0.08916934,0.00011358868,0.013031726,0.7019266,0.029560618,0.08968684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015169311,0.00021654562,0.12919183,0.00013898395,0.00030059618,0.000035310437,0.16008414,0.00009648735,0.0035526631,0.12786272,0.57629186,0.00071192347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42845413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96329784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5740639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090802804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001927217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282543069","doi":"10.21991/c9009c","title":"BCGSEU: TURNING A PAGE IN CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.043553941281185574,"score_gpt":0.29173936810177226,"score_spread":0.2481854268205867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282543069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0553999,0.0005253168,0.00050042255,0.003596912,0.0016138449,0.00096293824,0.0001445623,0.00025641624,0.9369997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99751127,0.000015675187,0.0006980543,0.0007832663,0.0001866306,0.00011418525,0.000058633457,0.000008633541,0.0006236797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964534,0.00018118556,0.0005887642,0.0005612118,0.0005715829,0.0016438799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844605,0.00011663358,0.00015128317,0.0002461615,0.0003093424,0.00073054683],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068821764,0.00035782484,0.00039782436,0.00027864354,0.009296412,0.00013318629,0.0005210003,0.0003335471,0.0011597322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031769602,0.0003356616,0.00020716955,0.0005375361,0.011095793,0.0010549254,0.00012683372,0.00046103014,0.00042575615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011462591,0.00007130979,0.050291974,0.0000059667373,0.00004636176,0.00009733312,0.0030824586,0.00002316203,0.000046078858,0.94504213,0.0012224071,0.000059379072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013695088,0.000046202847,0.009544146,0.00023429503,0.000049684615,0.00004060082,0.0092404345,0.00004272815,0.00017004913,0.08079977,0.89751536,0.0009472257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85720843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97752756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9421113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016332293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013050641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284449078","doi":"","title":"Who Influences Family Law Reform? Discourses on Motherhood and Fatherhood in Legislative Reform Debates in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Child support; Compromise; Legislation; Law reform; Alienation; Family law; Political science; Child custody; Enforcement; House of Commons; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.023116226903533123,"score_gpt":0.2708984492598553,"score_spread":0.24778222235632216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284449078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7188395,0.001641903,1.7102779e-7,0.004028477,0.00015680114,0.00035286156,0.000022450502,0.000036856876,0.27492097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995643,0.0007903319,0.00005965976,0.001446097,0.00012768937,0.00006178134,0.000001956692,0.000018019799,0.0018514608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976361,0.000217942,0.00039495228,0.00043448922,0.0006170995,0.0006994556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992358,0.00015617184,0.00013512842,0.00018972286,0.00006690647,0.00021629108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003449279,0.00028601615,0.0004255355,0.000047753805,0.00067323155,0.00014525378,0.00035196927,0.00012866133,0.00013344674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014523014,0.00020921291,0.00005117769,0.00037683954,0.0005736026,0.00081559736,0.00008792494,0.00041961772,0.000035039528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011722907,0.00043248522,0.30575335,0.00008220531,0.00021652739,0.00016093106,0.16878381,0.0002398872,0.0002685941,0.5141883,0.0014925399,0.00826411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031008988,0.00036910598,0.55126154,0.00095789414,0.000040571016,0.0000024667263,0.28576827,0.0002208032,0.00051010464,0.0067358287,0.14918248,0.0018499901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99608415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99920774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5074525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030248025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015685518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8531455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284562238","doi":"","title":"Le Langage Des Accommodements Raisonnables: Quelles Perspectives Pour L'Égalité Des Enfants Handicapés En Milieu Scolaire? (The Language of Reasonable Accommodations: What Prospects for Equality of Disabled Children in Schools?)","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Inclusion (mineral); Jurisprudence; Ethnology; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022048788922028422,"score_gpt":0.32717876575793803,"score_spread":0.3051299768359096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284562238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7996363,0.19436926,0.00031081206,0.003943067,0.00013556604,0.0010663584,0.000040098184,0.000017663579,0.00048085346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9486516,0.048136406,0.0008301441,0.000028562905,0.00043090153,0.00008941222,0.000011205346,0.000032420376,0.0017893626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941836,0.0015627039,0.0007394161,0.00030215632,0.00058347266,0.0026286645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980064,0.00060953235,0.0006715224,0.00024083504,0.00031219315,0.0001595391],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006771128,0.00033609476,0.00064700685,0.00009385915,0.0016382915,0.00016304459,0.0007540141,0.00020655114,0.00007366831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015926562,0.00025716636,0.0003284275,0.00061882177,0.0011973912,0.0026510824,0.00017422864,0.0013681273,0.0000098255405],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017217416,0.0014471703,0.35727572,0.00020609784,0.0010116687,3.8384366e-7,0.28391674,0.0000384712,0.0007895281,0.34048504,0.000106318126,0.014550696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019045545,0.00016417327,0.14166735,0.00081860955,0.000191878,0.000012163878,0.7546971,0.000028393142,0.0012254404,0.09878996,0.00017239292,0.00032801984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049455896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10546418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4707803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022957656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019255121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286461920","doi":"","title":"Criminal responsibility for the non-disclosure of HIV-positive status before sexual activity.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Conviction; Appeal; Sexual intercourse; Condom; Dishonesty; Supreme court; Criminology; Psychology; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Law; Political science; Medicine; Family medicine; Population; Environmental health","score_opus":0.03909334202062168,"score_gpt":0.3032778931720079,"score_spread":0.26418455115138617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286461920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.985618,0.000088505,0.00006829361,0.007751177,0.00020925976,0.0031945384,0.000100483354,0.00003109058,0.0029386517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940028,0.000008518637,0.00014281739,0.000066227396,0.00024238956,0.002440426,0.000003686771,0.0000077220575,0.0030853746],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983862,0.00021272544,0.00017084985,0.00023841225,0.00037943808,0.0006123425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998283,0.0009269918,0.00013326424,0.00017173447,0.0003487097,0.00013629148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000911674,0.0001231878,0.00020730136,0.000018196026,0.0008169943,0.00006757637,0.00023657999,0.000089047026,0.000038671435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015503844,0.00007397209,0.000099737015,0.00015912247,0.00075235043,0.00031400853,0.0000906027,0.00013381791,0.000008936469],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060475856,0.00038842106,0.09920789,0.00015013057,0.0003972918,0.0000013232385,0.2612669,0.000010488056,0.00041712951,0.0033500018,0.0122959325,0.62190974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002582493,0.000041983065,0.9677479,0.000002359884,0.00006266231,9.2640654e-8,0.028283667,0.000022530794,0.00034189547,0.00037743608,0.0027668,0.00009438575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017273394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070620026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86854005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023774317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000072454146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286894700","doi":"","title":"Sometimes Help Hurts: Imagining a New Approach to Section 15(2)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Supreme court; Charter; Law; Deference; Political science; Law and economics; Section (typography); Substantive law; Sociology","score_opus":0.018972716733451977,"score_gpt":0.28571137156409193,"score_spread":0.26673865483063997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286894700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55869347,0.0110111395,0.028545126,0.10326286,0.0028720757,0.0024727967,0.0000023546975,0.00063429825,0.2925059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9472358,0.0015978982,0.0018402406,0.00038537596,0.00317637,0.00003263236,0.0000013790325,0.000022453129,0.045707803],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963534,0.00020204375,0.00024857733,0.0002571105,0.0005414807,0.0023973759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992129,0.00006287523,0.00012797522,0.00009597452,0.00019869565,0.00030155288],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014928296,0.00017070446,0.00021571494,0.000092524104,0.0014128402,0.000347326,0.00035616913,0.00009533554,0.0003117573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038739754,0.00013626592,0.00013209977,0.00043862945,0.000105205545,0.00070439006,0.000063679836,0.00125025,0.00049852533],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007413899,0.0003959796,0.0077700857,0.000021322272,0.0011279613,0.0000030146944,0.21302137,0.00035189692,0.003120974,0.28801328,0.12878016,0.35731983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015635235,0.0003452574,0.0079947645,0.000064946464,0.00013892988,0.00015028639,0.4770229,0.00014935661,0.00012087936,0.17801991,0.3332406,0.001188662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021131875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057202056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3885424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019867737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012674582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287021274","doi":"","title":"Fraternal Justice: Outlining Charles Doherty Gonthier’s Approach to Law, Morality and Community","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Morality; Economic Justice; Tribute; Humanism; Citizenship; Compassion; Political science; Courtesy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03830158954409527,"score_gpt":0.32992563649234596,"score_spread":0.29162404694825067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287021274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97218287,0.0006435163,0.0003751557,0.004009751,0.00049715757,0.00023569194,0.000004697921,0.00007043288,0.021980703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957118,0.0008744928,0.00097374147,0.00036320684,0.00090260134,0.000011477459,0.0000018107182,0.000014913495,0.0011459818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963325,0.0007704404,0.00028696787,0.00019999426,0.00046715746,0.0019428969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898815,0.00018368645,0.00015773569,0.0001652641,0.00020515699,0.00030003392],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006666493,0.0001946847,0.0002774577,0.000035326826,0.005650201,0.00034769197,0.00054022355,0.00017371897,0.000022781003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065141,0.000149323,0.00009024415,0.00016002699,0.00053862203,0.00041728362,0.00015859837,0.005970111,0.00001862137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076904056,0.00032047735,0.015306099,0.00003014686,0.0002574914,0.0000020156472,0.10322191,0.000014717359,0.0011588655,0.86230075,0.00032690968,0.016983699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022002705,0.00062615686,0.05946525,0.000071282644,0.00044427224,0.00016869309,0.65781695,0.00013763795,0.00017132779,0.18649822,0.090902746,0.0014971677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034179337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11544055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6758025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005634666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004707749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99632317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287174608","doi":"10.7202/1100998ar","title":"LE DROIT EUROPÉEN DES DROITS DE LA PERSONNE DANS LA JURISPRUDENCE CANADIENNE ET QUÉBÉCOISE","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Police Service; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.017499604345205696,"score_gpt":0.28695559922548985,"score_spread":0.26945599488028416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287174608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68361795,0.00073449034,0.00025262457,0.017491618,0.0011268299,0.00028351965,0.0002829733,0.00027241872,0.2959376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93476784,0.0037524714,0.0007381228,0.0006654833,0.0010912083,0.000110346715,0.00006936955,0.00008217786,0.058722977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957239,0.0009827388,0.0005595528,0.0007465103,0.00065336825,0.0013339133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969144,0.001458043,0.00030248234,0.0002899202,0.0003937755,0.00064140296],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023162542,0.00042891395,0.00047051616,0.00020253727,0.0009971845,0.00037175152,0.0012638515,0.0004053161,0.00029323352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022587457,0.0005406364,0.00039023315,0.000976142,0.0021206164,0.00072582025,0.0002460518,0.0007259779,0.00051189243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003111518,0.0002030706,0.005156999,0.00011391419,0.0002861013,0.0008239717,0.119406015,0.00075262744,0.00069665903,0.86400455,0.0022725698,0.0062524006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094550016,0.000108805536,0.17834112,0.0009241948,0.00019201978,0.0004908113,0.034982484,0.0051618502,0.00013963188,0.08813211,0.68945557,0.0011259248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71266085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78556544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77587247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004067403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016734396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288220793","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Castaways: Poverty and the Mclachlin Court","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Poverty; Scrutiny; Political science; Law; Disadvantage; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); High Court; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.012166787109998906,"score_gpt":0.27814098004814913,"score_spread":0.2659741929381502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288220793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65740013,0.0100548025,0.0014948857,0.2213726,0.0029105642,0.00090454036,0.000014931232,0.00014307977,0.10570448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99319065,0.0033588368,0.00007402844,0.000533382,0.00083990075,0.000005496511,6.395133e-7,0.0000034735497,0.0019935905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783295,0.00017697427,0.00016659294,0.00012439376,0.00040819185,0.0012908913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993579,0.000230688,0.00010020523,0.00006507756,0.00014852389,0.00009763953],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031584373,0.00010388033,0.00014710335,0.000013154346,0.0025074575,0.00013873333,0.00022998068,0.00008593072,0.00010459242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006273506,0.000058290072,0.00008656941,0.00009250221,0.0026608615,0.0002058489,0.000043908625,0.0019856223,0.000025417938],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002960093,0.000012659762,0.0018057538,6.426386e-7,0.000072948475,0.0000012106525,0.0026247746,7.158587e-7,0.0000690407,0.9918395,0.0008786836,0.0026644215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033684468,0.00007247112,0.0028123497,0.0000127027715,0.000105689345,0.00041448345,0.061006967,0.000055759916,0.000021047203,0.4122964,0.51947814,0.00035551333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019361583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035988808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5795431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040846813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013210732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99879116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288602243","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2201883","title":"A Situational Approach to Incapacity and Mental Disability in Sexual Assault Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Situational ethics; Psychology; Mental health; Psychiatry; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Social psychology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.020508094928500684,"score_gpt":0.289812920759463,"score_spread":0.2693048258309623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288602243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.983973,0.000244946,0.000076995915,0.008376021,0.00006429038,0.0004172077,0.0000026970865,0.000019413921,0.00682538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986897,0.00012813436,0.00031241105,0.0001691275,0.0002297817,0.000035809688,0.0000024999954,0.000005417151,0.00042708582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974575,0.00026886706,0.00021296159,0.00021284906,0.00051860505,0.0013292156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995555,0.00007715859,0.00006071481,0.000056159355,0.00009824987,0.00015216784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020421068,0.000116557094,0.0001612345,0.000020133532,0.0008747353,0.00013433392,0.0001750583,0.000087735585,0.00005197714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019186981,0.00009240566,0.000036753867,0.0001504264,0.0004313687,0.00047726533,0.00006705968,0.00096860935,0.00003174025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003742561,0.00051281124,0.20991036,0.000009493251,0.00013116721,3.971918e-7,0.060808197,0.00002683131,0.00042424805,0.7078383,0.00056030997,0.01974045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016021497,0.0003216937,0.39749297,0.000014266911,0.000024255005,0.000054203072,0.3709314,0.0002571553,0.000013640018,0.22124478,0.00737106,0.00067244685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04313658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12640846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4865935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002375295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030544566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96323526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289016748","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1411164","title":"Property Rights for Unmarried Cohabitants in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Property rights; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Medicine; Business; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01077218619591573,"score_gpt":0.2544020456370191,"score_spread":0.2436298594411034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289016748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9748086,0.0021824199,0.00010537783,0.008410058,0.0005205589,0.0007059414,0.000009048636,0.000025561802,0.013232467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992647,0.00029667726,0.000055802062,0.00006083535,0.0004640159,0.000021036834,0.0000021494322,0.000007954673,0.006444515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968272,0.00012457703,0.0002601594,0.00015369777,0.00039390725,0.0022404795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953526,0.00009178161,0.000111020156,0.000051780542,0.00013830182,0.000071877344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010889944,0.00011874656,0.00018882654,0.000027963799,0.0010669554,0.00005066365,0.00024611247,0.000054224776,0.00002506453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012889932,0.000071929004,0.00006321183,0.00018236748,0.00008618857,0.00017473272,0.000015518279,0.0006222722,0.0000040239347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030087132,0.0002587773,0.25279182,0.000027213257,0.00035542416,0.000038344522,0.007183757,0.00025155835,0.0003826348,0.6929218,0.023573369,0.021914413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035078642,0.00022774564,0.052495,0.00006927366,0.000062613464,0.000031784257,0.04268955,0.00011560829,0.00017235907,0.54506016,0.35465908,0.00090897206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99987376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3310857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010252629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0085487645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99707186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289101702","doi":"","title":"From Equal Access to Individual Exit: The Invisibility of Systemic Discrimination in Moore","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Political science; Special education; Law","score_opus":0.046630776396146524,"score_gpt":0.3464526636654009,"score_spread":0.29982188726925435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289101702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876321,0.0009829496,0.00024795602,0.009974413,0.00017394565,0.00053957844,0.000006435836,0.000013259273,0.00042939227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986377,0.000766017,0.000022308966,0.000091886286,0.00032308337,0.000034805475,0.0000025822444,0.0000063983375,0.00011524245],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717426,0.00050355337,0.00038093032,0.0001766245,0.0006158409,0.0011488051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999171,0.0002348919,0.00021144847,0.00011765633,0.00018840024,0.00007658876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026136532,0.00011322314,0.00020566962,0.00008309533,0.00046924784,0.00019691049,0.0007955287,0.000082153565,0.000069141264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006530562,0.000069732014,0.00007690571,0.00047277828,0.00017352642,0.000652795,0.00015080685,0.0008423814,0.000019993535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007437046,0.00027491615,0.37729883,0.000033647,0.0004107915,0.0000017020625,0.4152349,0.00021305624,0.0015612631,0.11821181,0.0020802196,0.0846045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004637659,0.000104046805,0.4907563,0.00009191877,0.000042871823,0.0000035082776,0.31952155,0.0000246991,0.00009427778,0.18850438,0.00019087276,0.00020181878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0737301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1124791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11345747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011530875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005452655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.932438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289191386","doi":"","title":"Morito, Bruce – An Ethic of Mutual Respect: The Covenant Chain and Aboriginal-Crown Relations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Histoire sociale","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Crown (dentistry); Chain (unit); Sociology; Philosophy; Theology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04196600170982918,"score_gpt":0.331758123702943,"score_spread":0.2897921219931138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289191386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88793147,0.005649474,0.00004472088,0.039178643,0.0014944789,0.0006577168,0.00004368713,0.00016666806,0.064833134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836543,0.00014388873,0.00024520143,0.0001386156,0.00051412656,0.000020156389,0.0000040885293,0.000010755555,0.015268824],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840254,0.00041165145,0.00021049415,0.00019736702,0.00051579333,0.00026214568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901015,0.00022568619,0.00016148914,0.00014152679,0.00032354583,0.00013763389],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011712089,0.00010977246,0.0002042234,0.00002426589,0.002476955,0.000046031557,0.00021224617,0.00015158452,0.0000374609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007866189,0.000080196805,0.00006194267,0.00028397216,0.0021883436,0.00023550304,0.000042598807,0.0002463237,0.000020746287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004543175,0.000117735355,0.0058842204,0.0000136663175,0.000050816252,0.000005957625,0.69082004,0.000011239338,0.0003391775,0.2671381,0.028428119,0.0071455007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004870193,0.000083008854,0.01767432,0.000023119335,0.000053790092,0.000001043826,0.10046455,0.000032123524,0.00003092468,0.0068980325,0.8740171,0.00023492237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032635745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028479904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84558904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005192812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046841113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289668687","doi":"","title":"The Child Support Obligation of Step-Parents","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Child support; Discretion; Legislature; Consistency (knowledge bases); Political science; Government (linguistics); Set (abstract data type); Liability; Law; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.013559951933013152,"score_gpt":0.29524343823151145,"score_spread":0.2816834862984983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289668687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91957414,0.0051331236,0.00034632423,0.021321844,0.00075121154,0.00037453286,0.0000020279708,0.00005175906,0.052445058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796673,0.015178399,0.00001444111,0.00004552311,0.0004037458,0.0000038174676,8.7294666e-7,0.000005928585,0.0046799453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758554,0.00016422482,0.00024839138,0.000093086834,0.0005221356,0.0013866469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940175,0.000062348925,0.00021994748,0.000074353804,0.00017785614,0.00006375732],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020993554,0.00008361616,0.000117807256,0.000022006561,0.0020350157,0.00006751885,0.00032802168,0.000054293727,0.00004203337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024275943,0.000052113795,0.000103560335,0.00021822115,0.0002334065,0.00020174774,0.000029419673,0.00070764485,0.000026030117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102065045,0.00017125158,0.08766562,0.000005915092,0.000618201,0.0000059668814,0.021022588,0.000027258948,0.00010395022,0.70843256,0.003069638,0.17877501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016977023,0.00059275056,0.082761005,0.0000646337,0.0001394443,0.00019106489,0.24589415,0.00002933757,0.00011115582,0.1302236,0.53777045,0.0005246702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001730112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022563018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5782089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079832925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006380696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289829629","doi":"","title":"Tracking Trajectories: Aboriginal Governance as an Aboriginal Right","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Scholarship; Trajectory; Tracking (education); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.02096227459114635,"score_gpt":0.39207706618783844,"score_spread":0.3711147915966921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289829629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85006833,0.00082761596,0.000034373035,0.011697524,0.0005452695,0.00024118058,0.0000059407066,0.00027971805,0.13630003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97102594,0.00076742825,0.0017662126,0.00028404954,0.0025112608,0.000021537697,0.0000024770611,0.000017120094,0.02360396],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795663,0.00014131403,0.00018425938,0.00036661292,0.0007323263,0.00061884115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991643,0.00010335503,0.0001306334,0.0001795291,0.00018038774,0.0002418225],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038713805,0.00021031141,0.00023676772,0.000016450824,0.0012309126,0.00019341455,0.00038802836,0.00012300856,0.0016549836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010833436,0.00017784153,0.00008753376,0.0003285037,0.00039791877,0.00088703603,0.000012210834,0.00026032364,0.00040984116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086687905,0.0002709029,0.009127056,0.000021540058,0.00008208202,0.000048013146,0.5527715,0.00007080215,0.0010079101,0.40741774,0.010403377,0.01869237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027733768,0.000051675263,0.015689695,0.000021305528,0.00002059161,0.0000021252044,0.016169634,0.000017641521,0.0007223874,0.00023046635,0.9665053,0.0002918293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03396096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02858397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95610195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061464193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024827494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290375835","doi":"","title":"Charter Remedies for Socio-Economic Rights Violations: Sleeping Under a Box?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Human rights; International human rights law; Law; Fundamental rights; Jurisdiction; Enforcement; Reservation of rights; Right to property; Jurisprudence; Cultural rights","score_opus":0.020633118852794993,"score_gpt":0.3107532768648806,"score_spread":0.29012015801208557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290375835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7943966,0.014756624,0.019563256,0.14843701,0.0023280047,0.0019975123,0.000014973254,0.00038607273,0.01811998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923683,0.0025667066,0.00026406228,0.0003605085,0.0017321971,0.000017074466,0.0000028216346,0.000009237379,0.0026790916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720144,0.00011265893,0.00030181935,0.00020193383,0.00023351461,0.0019486136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936336,0.00014150568,0.00019276683,0.0000771143,0.00012766948,0.00009756724],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015276837,0.0001543448,0.00022784369,0.00005451834,0.0028431022,0.00012595663,0.00024803707,0.00011333529,0.00005352286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000101033314,0.00012406002,0.00020971811,0.00007454084,0.00015526124,0.0004697849,0.000014299757,0.00066260836,0.000048514263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037845075,0.0000464947,0.000568125,0.000002716556,0.00028880735,5.628595e-7,0.014205232,0.000046903573,0.00020668046,0.97055656,0.0017043158,0.0123357605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007626487,0.00020151936,0.002772382,0.000026233542,0.00006574461,0.000010226992,0.024640927,0.00006678412,0.000033235207,0.9336063,0.037519373,0.00029462797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007197887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011643549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19797173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031241165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072629837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99845505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290982794","doi":"","title":"Sommes-Nous Dignes? L'Égalité Et L'Arrêt Gosselin (Do We Have 'Dignity'? Equality and Gosselin)","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Dignity; Humanities; Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; Ethnology; Law; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.022810778633647093,"score_gpt":0.31361140193666076,"score_spread":0.29080062330301365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290982794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48165777,0.39335635,0.0010886262,0.10998652,0.0017354488,0.0007278223,0.0000670477,0.00015296004,0.011227457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83978313,0.12602195,0.0001874445,0.0003960643,0.0029208283,0.000017340311,0.0000090296035,0.000055791857,0.030608404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98913956,0.0019760036,0.0011702769,0.00076649885,0.0012863916,0.005661255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974022,0.00062347885,0.00078787986,0.00026747712,0.0005025579,0.0004163914],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008341297,0.0007227377,0.00088734913,0.000098445766,0.0030035328,0.0007838081,0.00067555526,0.00057215866,0.00024065899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052919873,0.00062498415,0.0004924151,0.0005392118,0.001526714,0.0011617353,0.0002353406,0.0043408494,0.00019324769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010350055,0.00067526585,0.014500968,0.00009956534,0.00068033027,0.000036434787,0.028320447,0.000093187205,0.00023509348,0.87008935,0.004297707,0.08086815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002271217,0.00060270826,0.007153201,0.00029370267,0.00043975774,0.0003730285,0.11121977,0.00009449412,0.000088099594,0.6255311,0.2505429,0.0013900318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036176167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08843042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3581254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038801364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024622947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291013525","doi":"","title":"Shorter Article: Re-Conceptualizing Equality: A Place for Indigenous Political Identity","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Politics; Charter; Political science; Social equality; Equity (law); Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; State (computer science); Indigenous rights; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.043403333518152384,"score_gpt":0.36548106419938825,"score_spread":0.32207773068123585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291013525","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764508,0.0023471124,0.0072290413,0.008041526,0.00035939482,0.0005196796,0.000004920056,0.00009981103,0.004947708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936743,0.0011842983,0.0001686778,0.0004998529,0.0013379648,0.000024933915,0.0000018872786,0.000017968761,0.003090141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940813,0.00033793092,0.00038522246,0.00024860678,0.0006349238,0.0043119746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989805,0.00025801163,0.00014387687,0.000110452755,0.00023416038,0.00027297102],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003768844,0.0001703521,0.00026516983,0.000046239205,0.0021406084,0.00026815108,0.00039321653,0.00014543209,0.000101876896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007473849,0.00014549689,0.00020656141,0.0002612668,0.00033003028,0.0007470337,0.000057882826,0.0010341265,0.00004262094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077039345,0.0001012637,0.018873166,0.0000060187795,0.00023001194,0.0000061295104,0.041645985,0.000005121138,0.00010854343,0.9316512,0.0002267614,0.007068755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016365458,0.00042042084,0.0059315967,0.000038806458,0.0001795696,0.00011674073,0.38210833,0.000040579987,0.0000766967,0.5395456,0.06923641,0.0006687256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006736233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07043911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3921056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032848371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013629296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292220865","doi":"10.4324/9780203796221.ch2_7","title":"Child support, spousal support and the turn to guidelines","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Turn-taking; Turn (biochemistry); Psychology; Child support; Social psychology; Political science; Communication; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.08668117938692038,"score_gpt":0.35458082140110764,"score_spread":0.26789964201418726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292220865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000029189641,0.00087912666,0.0000036086105,0.07932502,0.0005683518,0.0008370475,0.00004489829,0.00012846461,0.9181843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003543012,0.00095231895,0.00035940344,0.005261737,0.0020428728,0.00002396568,0.000016626987,0.000034225646,0.98776585],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976661,0.000057465968,0.00048798966,0.0004301521,0.00092841533,0.00042982821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984456,0.00012142761,0.00018217892,0.00024086105,0.0006733148,0.0003366757],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014796883,0.00036939478,0.0005856304,0.000041505216,0.00091781834,0.00017070182,0.00045289728,0.00032709178,0.0037006023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065479067,0.00019922493,0.00018117786,0.000040232353,0.0010676674,0.00011738628,0.00037711253,0.0003305302,0.00077746296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021402682,0.0000035149644,0.000019814128,0.000005117429,0.00008717671,0.000009901027,0.010354608,6.197795e-7,1.5210986e-7,0.335061,0.6507366,0.003700114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003948475,0.000042390704,0.00005269805,0.000027553217,0.00008413476,0.000005266279,0.0025451079,7.0970094e-7,4.4889214e-7,0.004622089,0.9918887,0.00033604994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006821531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014372294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34115213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015604508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016285105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292520573","doi":"","title":"Matrimonial Real Property Issues On-Reserve","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Land law; Customary land; Government (linguistics); Property law; Law; Political science; Property rights; Property (philosophy); Land tenure; Real property; Business; Geography; Legislature; Agriculture","score_opus":0.1437467358959786,"score_gpt":0.3737842354980978,"score_spread":0.2300374996021192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292520573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.980654,0.00008402632,0.000010466307,0.008760405,0.0004301263,0.0005736874,0.000020903595,0.00041550116,0.009050896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9450598,0.00044290168,0.000068887515,0.00026895414,0.0005139954,0.000002820318,0.000009285083,0.000032646913,0.05360075],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689955,0.0004681334,0.00025075534,0.00064144924,0.00092803274,0.0008120853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868655,0.00008066907,0.0001731962,0.00038419626,0.00027955035,0.00039584903],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000533691,0.00035712455,0.0003926921,0.0001931826,0.0017023669,0.00043224066,0.0010919628,0.00031273696,0.00006316626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000185591,0.0002854873,0.00021464811,0.0005953271,0.0005750663,0.0017742987,0.00036883366,0.00060084887,0.00089875836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020764182,0.00023632853,0.97784764,0.000032330176,0.00011992322,0.00036879213,0.016902415,0.000062843894,0.00028960526,0.0034397994,0.000020106807,0.00047257103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019191342,0.00028266732,0.90122795,0.00022355629,0.00008491424,0.000003499385,0.007440052,3.417454e-8,0.0009096964,0.00050345383,0.08665397,0.00075105217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047736857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.073413365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08663387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011972126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022180405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292859697","doi":"","title":"HIV, Fraud, Non-Disclosure, Consent and a Stark Choice: Mabior or Sexual Autonomy?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Dignity; Supreme court; Autonomy; Charter; Political science; Law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.022947279053991746,"score_gpt":0.3047823830619129,"score_spread":0.28183510400792117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292859697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9769815,0.0027944949,0.00013584204,0.015156188,0.00028700463,0.000587387,0.0000056137237,0.000068308604,0.003983611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96525997,0.0027606678,0.00022954601,0.00023726703,0.0008924535,0.000038214195,0.0000018537844,0.000018909965,0.03056113],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621195,0.00021401732,0.00033104065,0.00028273865,0.0004705178,0.0024897424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894243,0.00028572377,0.00019656868,0.00010887874,0.00019654524,0.00026985945],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011956185,0.00022758187,0.0002989914,0.000050149392,0.0016301797,0.0003073501,0.00030281296,0.00014039736,0.00051156315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043541018,0.00015424701,0.000080075486,0.00019217578,0.00048151717,0.00048126682,0.000088185785,0.00129545,0.0001833575],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043611185,0.0010040631,0.41931438,0.0001711256,0.0039996686,0.00008660755,0.1677642,0.000030565923,0.0035707734,0.13060701,0.08258427,0.1904312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005836794,0.001640014,0.17674403,0.00013202625,0.0003409822,0.00032577018,0.41121587,0.00015390279,0.00009082238,0.055239506,0.34627378,0.0020064898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014932913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044486966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26368952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019071979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035365268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292892905","doi":"","title":"The Politics of Poverty: Why the Charter Does Not Protect Welfare Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Dignity; Politics; Law; Political science; Human rights; Jurisprudence; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.040835674136275965,"score_gpt":0.3142010506031132,"score_spread":0.27336537646683723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292892905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00721311,0.28298426,0.0000046994587,0.06853787,0.0015477111,0.005149888,0.00013353552,0.00010665209,0.6343223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91962403,0.07758015,0.0000161457,0.0021327944,0.00021100613,0.000101844045,0.0000040318655,0.000009120645,0.00032089048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984662,0.00018551934,0.00042380355,0.00015716796,0.000442341,0.00032499348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991091,0.000054956683,0.00029975368,0.00025094507,0.00020848369,0.000076775315],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008152287,0.00015676652,0.00035448946,0.0000053615945,0.0017214762,0.000025969237,0.000374503,0.000049399227,0.000053892618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044221677,0.000052597563,0.00017094126,0.00009546539,0.0013466974,0.00015831129,0.0001106714,0.00016464449,0.00000513595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004535968,0.000029239718,0.000026460255,0.0011138102,0.000036457986,1.4151465e-7,0.0038078139,8.9210617e-10,0.000001942557,0.990174,0.00035923932,0.0044463803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009673727,0.00003848001,0.00023195213,0.0014154639,0.00006207407,4.244957e-7,0.00066528947,3.0568367e-7,0.00023018468,0.0044030137,0.9927531,0.00010301221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023223404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010464658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99239385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006202886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018034481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292908900","doi":"","title":"A Model of Scholarship","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Economic Justice; Sociology; Administration (probate law); Law; Political science; Accommodation; Psychology","score_opus":0.1136490345130346,"score_gpt":0.3639974830398208,"score_spread":0.2503484485267862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292908900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6501848,0.00015161028,0.00014273301,0.00876476,0.00003027406,0.000105373176,0.0000014210041,0.00006749803,0.34055156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97980106,0.000052609437,0.007758661,0.00020616327,0.000089607514,0.000003466238,1.4947673e-7,0.000001995308,0.012086262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944186,0.000033932814,0.0000892105,0.0000698251,0.00022463863,0.00014056059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975693,0.000035333123,0.000027586882,0.000048212194,0.000084970336,0.000046958896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002583605,0.00003810764,0.00007416471,0.000009544983,0.00023263264,0.000014850091,0.0001183519,0.00003987322,0.00024468935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020675713,0.000028010925,0.00004097121,0.000076503435,0.00015060039,0.00021701433,0.000027715894,0.000052068845,0.00006966582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015804657,0.00018824586,0.027134154,0.000016157908,0.00006892046,3.7492515e-7,0.13103881,0.0020617128,0.007118713,0.77596486,0.00876382,0.04762844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029295713,0.00014319572,0.088674136,0.0001214622,0.00015244533,6.091835e-7,0.09188714,0.032015257,0.024135208,0.046530195,0.7114074,0.002003375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012639186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043715686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72943467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064725675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028000155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2679177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293317638","doi":"","title":"Commentary: The Limits of Conscientious and Religious Objection to Physician-Assisted Dying after the Supreme Court's Decision in Carter v. Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Criminal code; Criminal law","score_opus":0.020917824775093893,"score_gpt":0.2591472568507886,"score_spread":0.2382294320756947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293317638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91156495,0.00026878805,0.000008341414,0.086399764,0.00035112308,0.0008020571,0.0000110421615,0.000011094531,0.0005828592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965142,0.000085836444,0.000011839222,0.0027437536,0.00007806107,0.00039094902,3.1812644e-7,0.0000042536103,0.00017080779],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987951,0.0001763347,0.0001665527,0.00016116878,0.00039045434,0.00031040038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991404,0.00051733205,0.0000668223,0.000118466654,0.00009063957,0.00006633747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060584064,0.000080950704,0.00012529166,0.0000212114,0.00042439604,0.00004688003,0.00016362595,0.000030743206,0.0000033703068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027249104,0.000036808113,0.000028050486,0.00024194483,0.0002922427,0.000094319716,0.00006785088,0.000060731607,0.0000010698433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030016195,0.000098353295,0.16523317,0.000014669156,0.000120763936,0.000010312929,0.072174124,0.000008812657,0.0007257865,0.00020512115,0.17948279,0.58162594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031537848,0.000006839952,0.9407587,0.0000293668,0.00001694487,4.5137085e-7,0.0054965066,0.0000017154024,0.00015406625,0.00012642932,0.053006794,0.00008682129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4505218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9447538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7755255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039347663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004030374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55313724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293544640","doi":"10.71781/1760","title":"Mariage et divorce : harmonisation des normes civiles et religieuses dans une perspective de droit préventif","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.010304481771526309,"score_gpt":0.2328548133526758,"score_spread":0.22255033158114948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293544640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83594877,0.009373719,0.00041380984,0.0040366687,0.0014858287,0.0006956354,0.00011429213,0.00021486424,0.14771642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9319642,0.0051193726,0.001876724,0.00017365205,0.00030481504,0.000072875024,0.0003018329,0.00004609294,0.060140435],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99605054,0.0006292602,0.0004952144,0.0008969665,0.0011336309,0.00079440325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971723,0.00045310165,0.0006979872,0.0003144138,0.0009412202,0.00042097233],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062766444,0.0006416003,0.0005767056,0.00018246069,0.018708525,0.00025744544,0.0006717324,0.0008489849,0.00009753112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060570624,0.00072184665,0.00054849277,0.0006640383,0.002104335,0.0012225616,0.00025173873,0.0010582218,0.000076252516],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027609867,0.0002954287,0.029012809,0.00013670787,0.00053259503,0.00038355423,0.60815907,0.0007266826,0.017682955,0.34131777,0.0006168675,0.0008594601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006995237,0.00009855542,0.42330888,0.00037712892,0.00061922206,0.000091124086,0.5361608,0.00017124282,0.00496206,0.0074063493,0.02527505,0.00083003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70271295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69503677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39429605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02049834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033489198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293730945","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2468575","title":"Designing and Implementing Rights-Based Strategies to Address Homelessness and Poverty in Ontario","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Political science; Public administration; Economic growth; Environmental planning; Sociology; Geography; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.019409492255171613,"score_gpt":0.2918408322861725,"score_spread":0.2724313400310009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293730945","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952883,0.00065861526,0.00056173344,0.0014347073,0.000054418397,0.0003261639,4.6618385e-7,0.00001936081,0.0016562094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988906,0.00016650786,0.00039066127,0.00008415125,0.00007654153,0.000021495085,4.963707e-7,0.000006689845,0.00036289744],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972975,0.0001855376,0.00021773628,0.00019099028,0.00027290254,0.0018353127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995017,0.00013400125,0.000092184484,0.000043965927,0.00009998676,0.00012812945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016820652,0.00013630949,0.00020710642,0.0000675607,0.0011719592,0.00043664745,0.00014354577,0.00005970966,0.000082821316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000068260175,0.000103211365,0.00003080291,0.0001381389,0.000099738536,0.000591817,0.000054539763,0.0007919571,0.000004499126],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010648215,0.00013962967,0.5279556,0.000036161393,0.00034602158,0.000017139446,0.21531765,0.00014052054,0.0034126136,0.21303818,0.00032469642,0.03916534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002349537,0.00034059986,0.33728117,0.00014489058,0.000056540073,0.0000169297,0.43076918,0.000059458052,0.0002755814,0.22229628,0.005601028,0.0008088206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5309184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97308195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44216356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014721998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001099399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90138817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W229456410","doi":"","title":"The Covenanters in Canada: Reformed Presbyterianism from 1820 to 2012 by Eldon Hay (review)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Historical Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hay; History; Political science; Animal science; Biology","score_opus":0.02134384397751601,"score_gpt":0.2563559113974606,"score_spread":0.2350120674199446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W229456410","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003227349,0.768015,0.0000010493412,0.22121662,0.0008563043,0.0015648878,0.000045260444,0.000013088544,0.007965001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0109920865,0.9278478,0.00005817336,0.041028425,0.00021369087,0.0007171226,0.000019754933,0.000021997499,0.019100977],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977054,0.00030910032,0.00047994446,0.00029421636,0.00044219318,0.00076916855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814326,0.00022723597,0.00011482107,0.000272467,0.00012532157,0.0011169141],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043974438,0.00018779328,0.00050664134,0.000017516026,0.0006101884,0.000034494875,0.0006253912,0.000063091815,0.0010845817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016924628,0.00012069462,0.00008988479,0.00037039362,0.000054721084,0.0001724113,0.000043129137,0.00021224991,0.00034498604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.701839e-7,0.0000026692524,0.00013456409,0.000118117176,0.000008800724,0.0000042958113,0.00026662895,2.1750683e-8,0.0000033360327,0.00008394402,0.95890886,0.04046829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044153363,0.000007643114,0.0016904147,0.0016009072,0.00002085473,1.638821e-7,0.00010181385,3.1798302e-7,5.360142e-7,0.000025409472,0.9963213,0.00018647486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1801882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04286699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019391573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294594145","doi":"10.7202/1027138ar","title":"Jean Pineau et Marie Pratte, La famille, Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2006, 1057 pages, ISBN 978-2-89400-222-3","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.018849284659131924,"score_gpt":0.26888881780074275,"score_spread":0.2500395331416108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294594145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0672343,0.11575922,0.0023841397,0.24704501,0.0042213746,0.0024377068,0.0011552216,0.0008145096,0.5589485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45757824,0.14073516,0.006529778,0.0039979815,0.005418089,0.00020250579,0.0003555978,0.00019736121,0.38498527],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99485505,0.000730467,0.0009129759,0.00087195565,0.0007756805,0.0018538522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959769,0.001963609,0.0004749287,0.0005557065,0.00033443444,0.00069442485],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023061463,0.0005343715,0.00080720376,0.0001237587,0.002011611,0.00034633355,0.0007237747,0.00079081475,0.0010369265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015714223,0.0006923731,0.0005320174,0.001221173,0.0015440617,0.000806055,0.00030033776,0.0011271182,0.0012023997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082900675,0.0012565037,0.013669799,0.0005398824,0.000788721,0.0010564503,0.023316903,0.0005755789,0.00040756512,0.22429873,0.68465805,0.049348935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008690375,0.000092650174,0.05153566,0.00040147852,0.00028333123,0.000045722216,0.010174939,0.00021621407,0.000058987778,0.007830868,0.9274838,0.0010073377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037680972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037627585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39034396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001443934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002159755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295916283","doi":"","title":"Sexual Orientation as a Human Rights Issue in Canada 1969-1985","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Lesbian; Sexual orientation; Personhood; Politics; Political science; Ideology; Oppression; Sociology; Homosexuality; Law; Gender studies","score_opus":0.015300004676063563,"score_gpt":0.2908970586844502,"score_spread":0.27559705400838663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295916283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9173056,0.00006519829,0.0000027109713,0.0023647195,0.0005624679,0.00029836444,0.00000563266,0.000060026527,0.0793353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896735,0.0000034314337,0.000114949646,0.00074345537,0.00070083136,0.000039551735,0.000013073843,0.000009579135,0.008701656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979379,0.00031526858,0.00027570195,0.00034242537,0.00064142246,0.00048724952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992419,0.00013637546,0.00009947501,0.00017037007,0.000106045074,0.0002458636],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043757656,0.00016198715,0.00023551866,0.000024015186,0.0014892492,0.00010743114,0.00028339503,0.000089379755,0.00097565504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023642763,0.00014015882,0.00003358032,0.00025793584,0.0001986248,0.00033150482,0.000056724817,0.00023752337,0.00039201108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003686367,0.000147051,0.1325777,0.000056392862,0.00009403034,0.000056297176,0.039488275,0.0001138719,0.00082940963,0.7812193,0.04251825,0.0028625824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062124606,0.00005524208,0.049476303,0.000026606218,0.000014755654,5.02344e-7,0.008058554,0.000014716733,0.00029030634,0.0046370677,0.93644774,0.0003569451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99884224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8939295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012541357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024972414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296345132","doi":"","title":"A Perspective on Ontario's Adult Guardianship Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Law; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Political science; History; Art","score_opus":0.021924101022920327,"score_gpt":0.28558017130026264,"score_spread":0.26365607027734234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296345132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22151151,0.002937995,0.000032528016,0.045431145,0.00058236695,0.00034828667,0.0000023016048,0.00011996051,0.7290339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616204,0.0022347313,0.000035121033,0.00067896536,0.0008123905,0.00000912603,3.089648e-7,0.000013397304,0.034595545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962618,0.0002448974,0.00018954123,0.00023972375,0.00062383595,0.0024402312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991938,0.0001005088,0.000117127,0.00010424087,0.00032861097,0.00015572613],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009239012,0.0001771633,0.0002121178,0.000040259823,0.002123277,0.00015127758,0.0003294843,0.00011579701,0.00073285087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030336902,0.00014086884,0.00021377574,0.00017925579,0.00030971324,0.00028632217,0.00002449378,0.002216015,0.00036218026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017476215,0.00006509728,0.00070737395,5.755325e-7,0.00013872357,0.0000054772045,0.06627158,0.0000038167177,0.000005003002,0.93012816,0.0010499923,0.0016067219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001444682,0.00075735693,0.0027850117,0.000050713577,0.00009965558,0.000059708687,0.3796168,0.000008172748,0.000021066431,0.38835698,0.22613601,0.00066386454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30223122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89473844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7401089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014471361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060858246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99917585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296731696","doi":"","title":"Who's the Best Aboriginal? An 'Overlap' and Canadian Constitutionalism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Indigenous; Tribunal; Jurisprudence; Law; Metis; Political science; Constitution; Trespass; Treaty; Indigenous rights; Argument (complex analysis); Human rights; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.00968660414920812,"score_gpt":0.2872372949440118,"score_spread":0.27755069079480366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296731696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90280336,0.009878491,0.000064789245,0.03357438,0.00040029938,0.00025494746,0.000012621255,0.000031966432,0.05297912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98982686,0.004580004,0.000022888767,0.00024265329,0.0010927845,0.000004387857,0.0000023674406,0.0000055748983,0.004222452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755996,0.00016201183,0.00014271254,0.00013566577,0.00033652174,0.0016630986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947876,0.000057054487,0.000072306924,0.00006559245,0.00014980508,0.0001764994],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013197231,0.00010867116,0.00011329771,0.000036657926,0.0034748882,0.00022740744,0.0002390752,0.000071924245,0.000036569563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058450878,0.00007126453,0.00004848013,0.00015332179,0.000709302,0.00034060213,0.000009566473,0.00080910954,0.000020433989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028229044,0.00001121488,0.013751593,5.1362036e-7,0.00003158585,0.000003289441,0.0016520761,0.000009173286,0.000008638925,0.982449,0.00044938296,0.001630723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036172537,0.00008073385,0.018658495,0.000013647114,0.000054223667,0.00011351935,0.048673354,0.000011710236,0.0000036117224,0.17460896,0.75717235,0.00024766132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77359277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97360075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80784005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018637914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044263448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99782246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297252437","doi":"","title":"L’égalité des couples est- elle une composante des droits fondamentaux?: Réflexion critique à partir des droits français et québécois","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit international et de droit comparé","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0443527536107392,"score_gpt":0.34680182118216724,"score_spread":0.30244906757142803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297252437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89662564,0.010885628,0.005500484,0.017905625,0.0016477437,0.0008287527,0.00043178076,0.00037545455,0.06579888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747507,0.0062355907,0.007709257,0.0019616387,0.0011237542,0.00021277872,0.00023263904,0.00012333793,0.007650317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931878,0.0011109099,0.0013665383,0.001076808,0.0014981308,0.0017597993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99473655,0.0012750597,0.00063077046,0.00044764197,0.0017735393,0.0011364329],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030321924,0.0008367921,0.001171335,0.00022273335,0.0013456972,0.0007325849,0.0015524621,0.0005442064,0.00046676915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017966463,0.0010184067,0.0006205017,0.0010147736,0.0038903363,0.0017792003,0.0004581263,0.0010627678,0.0005176674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002754041,0.0011730581,0.054870717,0.0004573262,0.00081107207,0.0002412822,0.1698866,0.0046984884,0.0007986798,0.7564719,0.0032728526,0.007042622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035148184,0.00064542063,0.10606949,0.003907585,0.0005278586,0.0005039909,0.035932537,0.02164493,0.0015667088,0.6256362,0.19764253,0.0024079094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24269952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15469469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19436969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007506738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011031338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297723195","doi":"","title":"The Constitutional basis of aboriginal rights","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Law; Settlement (finance); Possession (linguistics); Political science; Supreme court; Legislation; Indigenous rights; Government (linguistics); Negotiation; Virtue; Human rights","score_opus":0.006323626108178241,"score_gpt":0.21448008867665588,"score_spread":0.20815646256847764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297723195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77875787,0.0020677291,0.000071404356,0.003055163,0.0014702645,0.00025975145,0.000028287972,0.00008817596,0.21420138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874849,0.00021806487,0.0005565046,0.00003557459,0.00026565263,0.000010126672,0.000004534736,0.0000030711183,0.011421627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984459,0.00011254295,0.00020743361,0.00021788123,0.0006865739,0.0003296166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880314,0.0002916927,0.00016720495,0.0001766916,0.00036828296,0.00019297388],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036812964,0.00013997685,0.00015815896,0.00004571457,0.022345016,0.000048663045,0.00040516217,0.00014205543,0.00007332011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013486457,0.000105733474,0.00016013897,0.0002274713,0.00456782,0.000280031,0.000080303835,0.00027610915,0.00003325105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007743639,0.000053925716,0.018262442,0.000004600959,0.00009784402,0.00007218563,0.01943301,0.00003809929,0.0045223464,0.95545924,0.0011803288,0.00079852843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039886133,0.000018773926,0.035248194,0.000015597281,0.000057690606,0.000048226877,0.013347594,0.00003660365,0.0033175047,0.0017132428,0.9456125,0.00018522373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10112602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06490418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.953746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013231762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011216475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99814117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298567743","doi":"","title":"Constitutionalized Multiculturalism and the Supreme Court of Canada (ESSAYS IN COMMEMORATION OF THE SEVENTIETH BIRTHDAY OF PROFESSOR OSANAI SATORU)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hōgaku shinpō","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Multiculturalism; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.020520665744205028,"score_gpt":0.2716435066810293,"score_spread":0.2511228409368243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298567743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.972226,0.0003656918,0.000001871358,0.022462914,0.00030446975,0.0010958741,0.00003433813,0.0000067831047,0.0035020153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991272,0.00007422827,0.00007654186,0.00013363577,0.000028460934,0.00004361793,0.000003226315,0.0000031101956,0.0005099864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982701,0.0005118753,0.00039565784,0.0001128703,0.0005242937,0.00018521324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986816,0.00043338072,0.00032696428,0.00012921327,0.0003906,0.000038245125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007139004,0.00010156932,0.00030291133,0.000013960246,0.00036564,0.000016701662,0.00025124822,0.000065903376,0.00007247568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086530193,0.000050645784,0.000063768784,0.00023357665,0.0017542997,0.00016697528,0.000093940034,0.00013066354,6.0219503e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016107294,0.00024821158,0.25514343,0.00037275642,0.0003313184,0.0000012847933,0.21441916,0.0002213384,0.005497678,0.4854523,0.03782245,0.00032899357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005386612,0.00002623838,0.86443746,0.00036517446,0.00010706455,0.0000012717686,0.10839267,0.00045230123,0.00413358,0.0038684737,0.012454097,0.00037508196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7574227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7807567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.609294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012314194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030369835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64637905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298674345","doi":"10.71781/7838","title":"Parenté fluide : la quête des origines au Brésil et au Québec : dialogue entre parenté, droit et science","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.011470979663765259,"score_gpt":0.22993750026624601,"score_spread":0.21846652060248076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298674345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88518876,0.009074663,0.0000635142,0.0020865053,0.0024542306,0.0007016958,0.00009669344,0.00018730987,0.10014666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91009235,0.002267908,0.0004126711,0.00014351548,0.00043032187,0.000086358414,0.0002410597,0.000035416266,0.08629042],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99432355,0.0006743671,0.00065893354,0.0011742316,0.0018413966,0.0013275158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99635005,0.0006070112,0.0006869721,0.00039608593,0.0011065545,0.0008533363],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008787588,0.00080806174,0.0007396252,0.00027605487,0.030651186,0.00035083247,0.0012257922,0.0005865819,0.00013321843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006812116,0.00081502704,0.0005200624,0.0010959192,0.0059755365,0.0020655373,0.00045494735,0.00073245564,0.00028237008],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001896407,0.00037873138,0.17779513,0.00022152021,0.000463992,0.00044062693,0.5759603,0.0011992684,0.0057061543,0.22989242,0.0006923919,0.007059873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012015124,0.00013230494,0.52156335,0.0008645354,0.00064890535,0.00013224427,0.30693683,0.0004948082,0.0021152506,0.0010238884,0.16330169,0.001584691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9696025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93070084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3437682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035438914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020210223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299030934","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1293510","title":"Rediscovering Constitutional Law: Succession Upon the Death of the Prime Minister","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Prime minister; Ecological succession; Law; Political science; Prime (order theory); Mathematics; Politics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.016359670584060106,"score_gpt":0.2928749110839194,"score_spread":0.27651524049985926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299030934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8610714,0.002911825,0.00011605352,0.016359763,0.000428869,0.00028659718,0.000004314768,0.000021788586,0.11879939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929576,0.001564942,0.000016996863,0.00016050912,0.00038666374,0.0000034255784,3.9964155e-7,0.0000037404136,0.0049057226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979809,0.000246423,0.00021021595,0.00010439627,0.00051786494,0.0009402141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956673,0.0000896879,0.0001339012,0.00009713887,0.000073304844,0.00003922808],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012953008,0.0000922846,0.00011558447,0.000008462419,0.002248865,0.00006938676,0.00043386788,0.000057660298,0.00019065931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008295938,0.000043752214,0.00013811982,0.00010174832,0.0008980716,0.00022664848,0.000045301473,0.0007781461,0.000013515253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026169362,0.000024296423,0.003810218,0.0000014130308,0.00006312655,4.5782912e-7,0.0028482853,0.00004049202,0.00019694967,0.98924273,0.000070113805,0.0036757546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016330164,0.0002261355,0.033361875,0.00026055123,0.0002078919,0.00018388272,0.03370904,0.000045716235,0.0015249362,0.3394584,0.588807,0.00058154913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025212034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005312115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6497843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071498257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010613357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299078079","doi":"","title":"Reasonable accommodation for Religion and belief: adding value to Article 9 ECHR and the European Union's anti-discrimination approach to employment?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reasonable accommodation; Accommodation; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); European union; Human rights; Perspective (graphical); Law; Religious discrimination; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.05025288171222708,"score_gpt":0.32137470093876097,"score_spread":0.2711218192265339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299078079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05701383,0.07677244,0.0032774739,0.04827492,0.00042345785,0.008573269,0.000026755812,0.0003290298,0.8053088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771123,0.013941668,0.0040153246,0.003671141,0.00041178797,0.000058868816,0.000014357509,0.000030463922,0.00074408046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679196,0.0022055053,0.00024244253,0.00023458166,0.00021765266,0.00030785883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993244,0.00014789616,0.00009783204,0.00015563927,0.00009808388,0.00017614485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00674064,0.00013103153,0.00021791493,0.000014709043,0.001090431,0.00014209807,0.00017218341,0.000014812047,0.0000032014093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071833195,0.00008556919,0.000050374318,0.00020416747,0.00015196847,0.00037056569,0.0002119484,0.000070300346,0.000059366113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011478266,0.0000803844,0.00048018125,0.00051143486,0.00003323585,4.412762e-7,0.019276205,0.0000099916215,0.00013360426,0.8645535,0.017910019,0.09699952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032014653,0.000023968782,0.014752081,0.0005950336,0.00008546003,0.0000013774503,0.0005965416,0.00001001581,0.000014747091,0.00007957818,0.98335207,0.0001689579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008355499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000073319454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96544206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006192038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005520102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8386824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300397219","doi":"","title":"My People's Courts as Agents of Indigenous Decolonisation?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law in context","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Project commissioning; Decolonization; Politics; Law; Treaty; Autonomy; Political science; Government (linguistics); Publishing; Judicial review; Assertion; Economic Justice; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.03678089804619587,"score_gpt":0.3414542548347494,"score_spread":0.3046733567885535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300397219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9230284,0.00030789242,0.0000023345067,0.0018149241,0.00023358245,0.0003675612,0.0000030325605,0.00002941047,0.07421284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99664384,0.0002745019,0.00004075604,0.0006711836,0.0000800012,0.000029586237,0.0000023742527,0.00000584024,0.0022519182],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988689,0.00013152389,0.00022318892,0.00015096522,0.0003311167,0.00029432971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994225,0.00019922023,0.00010498157,0.00009189638,0.00011547601,0.00006592022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003246593,0.00008737984,0.00020268164,0.000018432713,0.00047439535,0.000034029083,0.00019631322,0.00009266601,0.00048044647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021683844,0.00007882242,0.000054193883,0.00018159971,0.0002517769,0.00015892081,0.000043150645,0.000088592205,0.00012694884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032870834,0.00020587895,0.4013762,0.0000134305465,0.00005151751,0.000025781275,0.48590755,0.000018434333,0.00005099999,0.10208822,0.0008975976,0.009331554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010262023,0.00009753668,0.5194414,0.00005086473,0.000022219236,0.0000019900467,0.06581565,0.000010071802,0.00015418802,0.004950725,0.40812582,0.0003033136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15862656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5374052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4200919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023531361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070939655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8469762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300948506","doi":"","title":"Ecclesiastical Responsibility for Clerical Wrongdoing","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Wrongdoing; Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Duty; Liability; Jurisprudence; Duty of care; Doctrine; Test (biology); Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Tort","score_opus":0.022077629416080675,"score_gpt":0.340420669153434,"score_spread":0.31834303973735334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300948506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9744064,0.00036487644,0.0069049723,0.012910699,0.00091500854,0.0004240989,0.000003289807,0.00009850194,0.0039721187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99494344,0.00029327287,0.0016393405,0.00009707784,0.0015209217,0.000015060127,7.7402717e-7,0.000013540213,0.0014765767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627066,0.00022279005,0.0002741085,0.00023692432,0.00042086738,0.0025746776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869955,0.0006406535,0.00010585174,0.00011479185,0.00023648626,0.00020266311],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005147029,0.00013301593,0.00020625384,0.000033847715,0.0019255199,0.00012358552,0.00034374997,0.00016298606,0.00008269482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004023975,0.00010511564,0.00019706447,0.00015806228,0.00045586115,0.00023179756,0.0000469362,0.0022216663,0.00003078199],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002038712,0.000101130434,0.004547504,0.000004189837,0.00009548735,0.0000017842134,0.004466114,0.0000029278847,0.0017836592,0.9537104,0.00051468733,0.03456829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018697688,0.0005964198,0.030738749,0.000019328761,0.0001296262,0.00009010123,0.044468693,0.00019252267,0.0001638738,0.7190883,0.20190264,0.0007399426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005366425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020099647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23462203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001026809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001995152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99937385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301007804","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1225","title":"Socioeconomic Rights Adjudication in Canada: Can the Minimum Core Help in Adjudicating the Rights to Life and Security of the Person under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"BC Cancer Agency","keywords":"Charter; Adjudication; Human rights; Justiciability; Political science; Social rights; Obligation; Right to health; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Reservation of rights; Core (optical fiber); Law and economics; Law; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.025416866768160604,"score_gpt":0.27763242342667305,"score_spread":0.2522155566585124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301007804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84902835,0.00020230206,9.943723e-8,0.14945889,0.00007285709,0.0002152571,0.000026871752,7.8549493e-7,0.0009945793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979827,0.000044137872,0.000002136254,0.0014530277,0.0004683211,0.00000459069,1.3739029e-7,0.0000031513612,0.00004180416],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873203,0.0003265539,0.0003270122,0.00009854387,0.00025976475,0.00025609625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897844,0.00033740982,0.0003741607,0.000075697564,0.000109504464,0.00012480885],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075640314,0.00010024073,0.00025165753,0.000037110596,0.0016670537,0.000034368746,0.00027428733,0.00008373425,0.000008959962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007761313,0.00003775016,0.00005215181,0.0001086384,0.0012889166,0.00009845807,0.000042376305,0.00021817858,1.9651159e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003513973,0.000026143736,0.033552215,0.000017237082,0.00014866373,0.0000017776888,0.5784915,0.0000017515177,0.00014076525,0.38337067,0.0036477929,0.000566368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081749546,0.00003838219,0.89259785,0.00009315197,0.00004533772,0.0000032403068,0.045691032,0.000009857681,0.000054930882,0.05292713,0.007565059,0.00015650131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8590457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007471589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010551194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301583531","doi":"","title":"Pay Equity: A Fundamental Human Right","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Human rights; Equity (law); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.048318195603266334,"score_gpt":0.32748867441336105,"score_spread":0.2791704788100947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301583531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2763292,0.0011872248,0.0000051962265,0.009950535,0.0008545325,0.00057242723,0.000021682317,0.00044701458,0.7106322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9511117,0.00011287328,0.00019572652,0.0011394689,0.00097008696,0.00004477917,0.0000055288197,0.000016299247,0.046403535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976574,0.00020886399,0.00027497916,0.00037501415,0.000762758,0.0007209656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913937,0.00008074989,0.000103695835,0.00022417044,0.00008738598,0.00036465275],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004237906,0.00021044908,0.0002742682,0.00002319186,0.0030252892,0.00034894713,0.0004793553,0.00014739828,0.012683552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014236645,0.0001508536,0.00016532546,0.00023754082,0.0007404249,0.0005126322,0.00026921483,0.0003427807,0.003015731],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012680358,0.0005012324,0.022900615,0.0000443882,0.00023857885,0.00009080617,0.0323055,0.0000037504096,0.0021752547,0.7740019,0.16147493,0.006250375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048563234,0.000053151936,0.0052166497,0.000024636634,0.000028195307,0.000001161986,0.0030747137,0.0000055626288,0.00019301628,0.0037578645,0.9868051,0.00035431073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02362793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03447239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8253302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005301144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001888161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99827266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302244006","doi":"10.18061/dsq.v36i1.3734","title":"Brokenness / Transformation: Reflections on Academic Critiques of L'Arche","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disability Studies Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14632334688856152,"score_gpt":0.45601841871016224,"score_spread":0.3096950718216007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302244006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9284826,0.00051384314,0.00011649393,0.057703894,0.00046052493,0.0005734681,0.00005056488,0.00018613214,0.011912478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983068,0.00081675436,0.000079653386,0.00011015962,0.00023662836,0.00012225992,0.0000011321356,0.0000069447233,0.00031964263],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796927,0.00046425368,0.00046244718,0.00028097339,0.00046153538,0.0003615393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998054,0.0012104103,0.000104061575,0.00019216524,0.0003553083,0.00008404494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008233126,0.00016736654,0.00035041958,0.000024137553,0.0008898506,0.000014583987,0.0002330775,0.0001229656,0.000061401086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008904068,0.000102579615,0.00016656576,0.00024520117,0.002574537,0.00045891412,0.000017502716,0.00013007985,0.0000373036],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001028291,0.00027525183,0.011189099,0.00015809543,0.00024924128,4.3992745e-7,0.79612297,5.123651e-7,0.0012871464,0.09208237,0.0018932096,0.09663885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009087713,0.0010407664,0.083081834,0.00034532935,0.000087105676,5.453457e-7,0.8323867,8.621826e-7,0.0013779763,0.033069868,0.047168817,0.000531459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014356017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008884044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09610739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055769365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003413325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9485989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302347562","doi":"","title":"The Division of Property and Unmarried Cohabitants: The Supreme Court Draws a Line in Nova Scotia (Attorney-General) v. Walsh","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitutionality; Nova scotia; Law; Political science; Charter; Sociology; Ethnology","score_opus":0.018799604003220907,"score_gpt":0.28749624766677007,"score_spread":0.2686966436635492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302347562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97245693,0.010574601,0.000054234828,0.013503296,0.00029250252,0.00047060323,0.000002109424,0.000013883409,0.0026318196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882042,0.009207303,0.000035326164,0.00007841629,0.00014933813,0.0000044694366,4.1261197e-7,0.000011075847,0.0023094807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996651,0.0007277612,0.0003950045,0.00018035146,0.00054636394,0.0014995148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990832,0.0002723892,0.0002165935,0.0001324169,0.00021753908,0.00007781501],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056038736,0.0001581396,0.00023808288,0.000028883002,0.0013603099,0.00012602574,0.0003827312,0.00008594054,0.000026778329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012352059,0.00006587053,0.000085408756,0.00033517252,0.0006436767,0.00019830996,0.000058473914,0.0010777852,0.000006102198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002851196,0.00041799492,0.26387072,0.000032509895,0.00076097023,0.0000086225755,0.05803524,0.00011684682,0.0065371087,0.62444323,0.0025955003,0.04289616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00898262,0.0020909905,0.1854386,0.000590945,0.00034129125,0.00018146471,0.27740505,0.0004936453,0.0025302742,0.2294111,0.2906042,0.0019298356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00834733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18848807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39503214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077862956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010267517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302387167","doi":"","title":"Twenty Years of Equality Rights: Reclaiming Expectations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Charter; Social equality; Political science; Social rights; Cultural rights; Human rights; Democracy; Law; Corporate governance; Law and economics; Public administration; International human rights law; Sociology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.027560441343334702,"score_gpt":0.3340070092693359,"score_spread":0.3064465679260012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302387167","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9743987,0.0037402122,0.00075791264,0.006082691,0.00025654494,0.00018332055,0.0000030989568,0.00005615887,0.014521396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99540067,0.0013486091,0.00047128942,0.00003051677,0.0005698054,0.000003985625,8.850741e-7,0.0000056009076,0.002168656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763787,0.0002474224,0.00029338629,0.000121051984,0.00044107952,0.0012592075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993646,0.00012231825,0.0002112918,0.00007445288,0.00014885694,0.000078462646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015766318,0.0000816459,0.00016234032,0.000041785315,0.0010646733,0.000039040944,0.00024136895,0.00006594264,0.00009162986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024670313,0.000070788854,0.0001282449,0.00020209575,0.0002035679,0.00032209556,0.000026552214,0.000698733,0.000037764934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027015587,0.00015102874,0.00254584,0.000004224343,0.00028685614,0.0000011517365,0.09444368,0.000052389514,0.00029248133,0.8140029,0.00055216666,0.087640315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017108712,0.0002641666,0.011174317,0.00007845571,0.00017051073,0.000028691536,0.37075868,0.00004494117,0.00067095825,0.34418336,0.27017584,0.00073923566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003550065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036328245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46981952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016121444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061854545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98125625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302390928","doi":"","title":"Not So Simple after All: A Comment on Ravndahl v. Saskatchewan","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Plaintiff; Law; Political science; Statute of limitations; Supreme court; Charter; Constitution; Legislation; Statutory law","score_opus":0.016314799651238665,"score_gpt":0.30375050612404636,"score_spread":0.2874357064728077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302390928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7316634,0.0022636026,0.0002753491,0.2592899,0.00039300084,0.00052421883,0.0000067244223,0.00015226746,0.0054315547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981556,0.0017333811,0.00005769656,0.01378662,0.00072046014,0.000009885777,0.0000020503883,0.00001180938,0.0021221056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99584377,0.0002519151,0.00027743963,0.000225126,0.0006946178,0.0027071289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935424,0.00008348743,0.00014083255,0.00012554285,0.00010561997,0.00019026455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014506412,0.00020420027,0.00024377361,0.000045252884,0.0011357461,0.00020713988,0.00034674056,0.00010972607,0.00015961153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011419327,0.00015650697,0.00020161047,0.00015070579,0.00017188542,0.0002038102,0.000031862593,0.0014702408,0.00011587337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012293515,0.001223269,0.0063695223,0.000011003243,0.0012118501,0.00008107976,0.25692955,0.000073225194,0.00096504233,0.3676157,0.035535246,0.32875517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001110953,0.00090202765,0.0064557916,0.000027541071,0.00007008647,0.000018322613,0.095280215,0.000006521214,0.00014066325,0.09351208,0.8019994,0.00047639667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040669586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036704406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7664642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002675942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010697447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9808732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302925434","doi":"","title":"The True North Strong and Free?: the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms' Impact on Homelessness","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parity","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Bill of rights; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.02624246557546174,"score_gpt":0.28460383425826563,"score_spread":0.2583613686828039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302925434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99256927,0.000444544,3.747137e-7,0.002046673,0.00008490019,0.00020115537,0.00003981675,0.000008741118,0.0046045277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99959177,0.00014067118,0.000004876307,0.000036221983,0.0001095052,0.000008305842,9.1882646e-7,0.0000024779429,0.0001052403],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915016,0.00013624552,0.00009613918,0.000117378295,0.00022790916,0.00027219867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993491,0.0002534605,0.000052431285,0.00014050218,0.00006514848,0.00013936327],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026892376,0.000089111985,0.00014319361,0.000010999269,0.0035137897,0.00005837778,0.00019780523,0.000049523234,0.000014365929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011268379,0.000039257815,0.00003676982,0.000087880166,0.0012811488,0.00008011999,0.000040273273,0.00014001454,0.0000025190113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019445415,0.000023309882,0.8993801,0.000005320633,0.000082776,0.0000043630725,0.0863929,0.0000036611357,0.0000022509528,0.0100407405,0.0026827378,0.0013623738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014348258,0.000022721102,0.9905588,0.000003951877,0.00000893886,5.064472e-7,0.0019158898,0.000015960166,0.0000074400123,0.0006677965,0.00658828,0.00006622793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88933235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98931545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099983074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010573492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007247098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2303265657","doi":"","title":"Equality Rights and the Charter: Reconceptualizing State Accountability for Ending Domestic Violence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Domestic violence; Redress; Political science; Human rights; Law; State (computer science); Sexual violence; International human rights law; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.021331843220529997,"score_gpt":0.32628815014833373,"score_spread":0.30495630692780373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2303265657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863334,0.006220065,0.002432101,0.0026153899,0.00033683953,0.00066132174,0.00000806728,0.000052530828,0.0013403093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960875,0.0023697712,0.0000832546,0.000060397906,0.0005749019,0.000033954522,0.0000012273688,0.0000071063505,0.0007818659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679154,0.000504054,0.00035312324,0.00023082536,0.00034279237,0.0017776787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986456,0.0007955722,0.00024194329,0.000093684204,0.00016013593,0.00006304853],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068704835,0.00014906621,0.00025442583,0.000021825497,0.0029764823,0.00021062995,0.00027009076,0.00005918621,0.000015617614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032444633,0.00008896416,0.00013088944,0.00012340091,0.00085625926,0.00037120373,0.000039902465,0.0007072578,0.0000036683894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014325645,0.000043255237,0.005093573,0.000014338501,0.0001276513,6.241595e-7,0.026082737,0.000014864624,0.00007332212,0.9516277,0.00008518552,0.016693521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013962869,0.000048836853,0.0025561012,0.000038830356,0.00004915332,0.000016186097,0.019536313,0.00005356576,0.000024184259,0.967061,0.009019676,0.0001998775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020637995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05508248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03444449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001280235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003884008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99832153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2304592484","doi":"","title":"Innes , Robert Alexander − Elder Brother and the Law of the People: Contemporary Kinship and Cowessess First Nation.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Histoire sociale","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kinship; Brother; Genealogy; Law; Sociology; History; Political science","score_opus":0.03034802104174251,"score_gpt":0.25144571455794673,"score_spread":0.22109769351620423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2304592484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35332683,0.01102566,0.00005619582,0.07755968,0.0015143474,0.0014494107,0.00001730658,0.00011328896,0.5549373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920182,0.00012307735,0.000022422973,0.00057493453,0.00017608916,0.000033676028,7.6307595e-7,0.000009430409,0.007041366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989127,0.00034969568,0.00016905196,0.00015032684,0.0002683243,0.00014993334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998964,0.0005969064,0.00015603374,0.00010365384,0.00014299195,0.000036429898],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054236455,0.0001052157,0.00022310397,0.000008960976,0.0028972991,0.000048461938,0.0001813805,0.0001000119,0.00007070873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048381332,0.000059486636,0.00006576438,0.00014550003,0.0034425484,0.00014210248,0.00009132468,0.000108708286,0.0000017970632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004100399,0.0000543671,0.053750042,0.00007252919,0.000078825884,2.011991e-7,0.25612774,8.769815e-7,0.00002535916,0.66824514,0.019933218,0.0016706948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002161946,0.000023178365,0.14058115,0.000077467535,0.000072131006,8.1624063e-7,0.033199724,0.000017736449,0.0000401462,0.009465186,0.81403595,0.00032454927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059308164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13558435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7941027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007144138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000534298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305078174","doi":"","title":"Supreme Court of Canada Orders Legalization of Physician Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia Carter v. Canada (Attorney General) 2015 SCC 5","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Homicide; Political science; Legislation; Assisted suicide; Medicine; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.019332433594327705,"score_gpt":0.2780323331402446,"score_spread":0.25869989954591693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305078174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97664285,0.002301555,0.00018753031,0.018402714,0.00034852908,0.00019882906,0.00002994,0.000010221768,0.0018778195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969433,0.00073899573,0.000021688555,0.00012890548,0.00019315051,0.0000021764442,0.0000021756603,0.000011006673,0.0019585893],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974455,0.00019263526,0.0003209942,0.00015344206,0.0006856293,0.0012017792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989907,0.00005402915,0.00032060596,0.00008471154,0.00043387487,0.000116068695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006796246,0.00013964903,0.00027727222,0.000029760182,0.00044741787,0.000018408087,0.00019948528,0.000056101464,0.000022981416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016982148,0.00009675387,0.000050006725,0.00017972456,0.00020940162,0.00020098305,0.000024754041,0.00025485287,2.1911828e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035570862,0.00028964446,0.34340304,0.0001549002,0.004172781,0.000032666227,0.024086747,0.00024274926,0.061861217,0.31919464,0.18448271,0.061723184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0087190885,0.00096257875,0.49599624,0.00081436837,0.00086532085,0.00007771008,0.14732283,0.00016097155,0.0128000565,0.020422185,0.30892724,0.0029313827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99988365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29877245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033024987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012290178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305847384","doi":"","title":"Lessons From History: The Recent Applicability of Matrimonial Property and Human Rights Legislation on Reserve Lands in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Redress; Indigenous; Political science; Law; Property (philosophy); Legislature; Supreme court; Tribunal; Property rights; Real property","score_opus":0.1399922365267671,"score_gpt":0.332261434246538,"score_spread":0.19226919771977088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305847384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922131,0.0000546814,0.0000032521293,0.006085113,0.00013247097,0.00039160912,0.000037924074,0.000024188628,0.0010576707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976622,0.000053570668,0.000003966886,0.00004876622,0.000069860194,0.0000023960379,0.0000040186687,0.0000066721796,0.0021485626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812555,0.00059120246,0.0001912721,0.00035624026,0.0004571513,0.0002785953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990672,0.0002656332,0.00016878762,0.00025810392,0.00012920446,0.00011105403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045640985,0.0001494201,0.00023394349,0.00005815824,0.0005321472,0.000034083234,0.00045166307,0.00010351332,0.000038431474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007764103,0.00008184468,0.000040803327,0.00017331002,0.00037607143,0.00049366354,0.00016452528,0.00023151957,0.0000054585184],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007416288,0.0000343209,0.9956722,0.000005500231,0.000020275134,0.00001059255,0.0028432598,0.0000010789603,0.00028282162,0.00047572082,0.000008160488,0.00057185563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005896662,0.00003156589,0.9142098,0.00007743313,0.000018876843,1.1534988e-7,0.00090863445,4.3856918e-8,0.00021716174,0.00020113328,0.08360526,0.00014030404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7514841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24613868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031268925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030623682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81767154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W230801979","doi":"","title":"All Who Minister: New Ways of Serving God's People","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Protestantism; Economic Justice; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Religious studies; Theology; Law; History; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.10762265324272592,"score_gpt":0.3515973416502959,"score_spread":0.24397468840756997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W230801979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039516203,0.1995838,0.0001345637,0.2535639,0.00025656383,0.0018863742,0.000008891885,0.0002682609,0.5047814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6892521,0.20255117,0.0025589874,0.097597115,0.00037723788,0.000080326965,0.000006620986,0.000022918353,0.007553541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980709,0.00055067084,0.00035712236,0.00026483354,0.000339814,0.00041667672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988312,0.0004687989,0.00019585624,0.00021588264,0.00011289264,0.00017537086],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009370532,0.00015999869,0.0005979468,0.000010324295,0.00024850052,0.000020160438,0.00040467703,0.00011659913,0.0028850285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003312117,0.00010178195,0.00023396859,0.00034376924,0.0003481587,0.00008814483,0.00009453102,0.00017113124,0.00009095336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064636015,0.000089947025,0.00837779,0.00059765467,0.00009476432,0.000014869174,0.008428022,3.6032083e-7,0.00004064869,0.8171331,0.14782405,0.017392287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009731567,0.000056526816,0.003913609,0.00040663715,0.00006410406,0.0000016494489,0.0008131557,4.0843824e-7,0.000026563304,0.006152074,0.9883022,0.00016580106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014050511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073899387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8404781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061147555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005988295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2310529507","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2753167","title":"The Parameters of a Charter Compliant Response to Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 5","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01684129724260358,"score_gpt":0.2847775032449265,"score_spread":0.26793620600232293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2310529507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90400153,0.0011716649,0.00013285737,0.09348767,0.00050914596,0.00024149442,0.000010959184,0.000013157735,0.00043150026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98897886,0.0010721566,0.00006053761,0.00034790204,0.00025944688,0.000012588675,1.790539e-7,0.000010471311,0.009257844],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637294,0.000558191,0.0002977268,0.00016374253,0.0006308024,0.0019766204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988221,0.00041593006,0.00016386982,0.00015315264,0.00024239623,0.00020258735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028788666,0.00013715813,0.00019963545,0.000027915907,0.0011497092,0.000057946196,0.0004627586,0.00004840128,0.000027314514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054176507,0.000067658635,0.00010209024,0.00015098316,0.00026134535,0.00011940717,0.000048462185,0.00040503457,0.000023124185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005987431,0.00027623834,0.04259194,0.000021687634,0.0036475707,0.000066201705,0.08648479,0.00007617635,0.077924244,0.22234352,0.32463285,0.23594734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017903764,0.0007078835,0.038081944,0.00011925737,0.00008555843,0.000045536275,0.044642568,0.000007891066,0.0010268246,0.011589098,0.901183,0.00072007184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36497334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92147356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5765501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032593976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038248634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.884275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312177042","doi":"","title":"Thomas Torrance's Mediations and Revelation by Titus Chung (review)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revelation; Philosophy; Literature; Art; History; Theology","score_opus":0.016700958542284355,"score_gpt":0.3078282451627417,"score_spread":0.29112728662045734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312177042","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1199141,0.67777413,0.000439413,0.06631058,0.0020687534,0.00091987225,0.0000071847767,0.000046981022,0.132519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87092793,0.12101111,0.0012659428,0.000841814,0.0006549965,0.000014609807,0.0000015748992,0.0000065010026,0.0052755405],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990477,0.0002652098,0.00026322142,0.00007018224,0.0001896666,0.00016401072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991267,0.0001983114,0.00028417257,0.00004821798,0.00024977126,0.000092828435],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005747139,0.00006900093,0.00022322855,0.000008017381,0.0002761654,0.000015570784,0.00013706504,0.00006820508,0.0014882189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006330935,0.000048379105,0.000052405463,0.000030728093,0.00023496003,0.00052460714,0.000027549582,0.000090630805,0.000020412588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026210184,0.00010888169,0.022225374,0.00010639345,0.00030699346,0.0000050130516,0.05173733,0.0000039277843,0.0021754724,0.04442495,0.8167187,0.062160756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010423171,0.0002763542,0.19363037,0.0003392695,0.00022397983,0.00003375986,0.010254162,0.000020930951,0.000060768605,0.009940299,0.78376925,0.0004085115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005908419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00350005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7510138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019390947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032648157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313184770","doi":"10.1086/678879","title":": <i>John Gower and the Limits of the Law</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Law; History; Law and economics; Art; Art history; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01984888938963204,"score_gpt":0.27983637644399845,"score_spread":0.2599874870543664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313184770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6571243,0.0027326548,0.000052620984,0.055137146,0.00085301633,0.00081253675,0.0000059558834,0.00008962703,0.28319216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817467,0.00006274282,0.00004586854,0.0005693311,0.00020594463,0.000018280007,1.4133107e-7,0.00000521026,0.000917806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987896,0.00037355692,0.00016125271,0.00014425741,0.00031167024,0.00021966026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991779,0.00036705128,0.00012198438,0.00020308426,0.00008638134,0.00004359927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065440265,0.00009242701,0.00018074833,0.000005053887,0.0009201013,0.000052140935,0.00031053973,0.000054675067,0.000016609683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016738233,0.000042851858,0.000086132146,0.00013556067,0.0021672556,0.00011770903,0.000021298729,0.00011399314,0.000013736908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047897312,0.000036408175,0.0037254423,0.00002684894,0.000056134326,2.8147136e-7,0.18306607,0.000002413691,0.00047184134,0.7822523,0.008881484,0.021432882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020358516,0.00020034176,0.05872182,0.00015631194,0.00008312109,0.0000014138947,0.026496338,0.000061005285,0.00053003215,0.01640109,0.8949471,0.000365554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004551872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054050027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88606566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020968215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013217558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79853433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313502888","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100006840","title":"Consent and Sexual Violence in Canadian Public Discourse: Reflections on<i>Ewanchuk</i>","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.050584916637055506,"score_gpt":0.3301268284584821,"score_spread":0.2795419118214266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313502888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8400629,0.01092143,0.000004839467,0.122491166,0.002151182,0.0003340963,0.00025160718,0.000008885004,0.02377388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744982,0.0106929215,0.00013172568,0.008467346,0.0008646105,0.000012258265,0.00000910648,0.00003580285,0.0052879923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611026,0.00038702213,0.0007046729,0.00048403084,0.00021996601,0.0020940693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932552,0.00046222718,0.00035335,0.00019580068,0.00043257105,0.0053008674],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017521518,0.0004115489,0.0007224473,0.0001634039,0.0025704629,0.0003662812,0.00037462782,0.0004908106,0.00022310433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005386632,0.00044820688,0.00025995646,0.00069113093,0.0034253006,0.0007081541,0.000030348512,0.0012453953,0.0000068923323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009363256,0.00005173986,0.014724757,0.000119499484,0.00034016644,0.0008830698,0.1801555,0.000036968424,0.000012155215,0.7841911,0.006207273,0.01326841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011386899,0.0003523998,0.013909418,0.00093456346,0.00016775128,0.000641813,0.269928,0.00006585514,0.0000013888425,0.0081430795,0.7038866,0.0008304121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9902151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99991846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.776048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006513877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064412174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315422183","doi":"10.1097/01.aog.0000287614.63474.3c","title":"A Skirt for a Life?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Obstetrics and Gynecology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Courage; Medicine; EPIC; Childbirth; Art history; Genealogy; Pregnancy; Law; Literature; History; Art","score_opus":0.043753891859252415,"score_gpt":0.31906745712990975,"score_spread":0.2753135652706573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315422183","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012656729,0.007341693,0.000078638885,0.96003425,0.0060313037,0.0012074861,0.00007495409,0.00009530408,0.023870667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004212082,0.00363749,0.0012534026,0.9414368,0.0057808785,0.00021216592,0.0000908817,0.000048259935,0.043327983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981436,0.00012307102,0.0002688054,0.00040454738,0.0002945155,0.00076543336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98152643,0.017769344,0.00018392365,0.00012134594,0.00027241526,0.00012654054],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048715202,0.00022748437,0.0004795141,0.00014707023,0.00094229693,0.00009039423,0.0002560534,0.0014879291,0.00012854878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029732483,0.00019459112,0.00014904441,0.00032368273,0.00049683684,0.00005475801,0.0001009874,0.00073326577,0.00003533463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017800885,0.000012857537,0.00028855947,0.00005754533,0.00007352478,0.00005130519,0.0026261974,9.499754e-8,3.887572e-7,0.00153327,0.9862973,0.009057156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032476248,0.00007245464,0.0005372203,0.0000061261817,0.00006423073,5.240928e-7,0.00087621174,0.0000027479496,4.3952662e-7,0.0006314136,0.99722105,0.00026283134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079508964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006926583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029245332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030982654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001554715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317453487","doi":"10.7202/1027259ar","title":"Élodie Petit, Cellules souches embryonnaires : droit, éthique et convergence, Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2003, 147 pages, ISBN 2-89400-169-X Alain Roy, Le contrat de mariage réinventé, Perspectives socio-juridiques pour une réforme, Montréal, Les Éditions Thémis, 2002, 455 pages, ISBN 2-89400-149-5","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Convergence (economics); Art; Sociology; Art history; Economics","score_opus":0.018096078631578,"score_gpt":0.24992360528592816,"score_spread":0.23182752665435016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317453487","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09091017,0.33281204,0.0039062144,0.49429858,0.0020881249,0.0043278444,0.004292565,0.0015323565,0.06583211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5007331,0.4247455,0.0063150777,0.001721604,0.0029088862,0.0009806488,0.00061442755,0.00028271752,0.061698038],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891298,0.0020853798,0.0019318113,0.0021262795,0.0013067607,0.0034199818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936239,0.00114111,0.0013041736,0.0011148055,0.0014785918,0.0013373825],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022700077,0.0015735494,0.002111851,0.00033101227,0.0069791144,0.0007991568,0.0015800216,0.0017685341,0.001663041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020469455,0.00196994,0.0014957373,0.0016534718,0.0047280854,0.002199068,0.00049881014,0.0025351457,0.00066670915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121766185,0.0025728194,0.0020941657,0.00064770074,0.0013419664,0.00068052195,0.042885497,0.0014659622,0.0014525133,0.39236444,0.5532876,0.0010850419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006289858,0.0006812015,0.040146597,0.0033197391,0.0020090493,0.0003693208,0.24932812,0.0010087915,0.0023590168,0.44789666,0.24094337,0.0056482553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1896795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13244861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49257696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005652977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027283016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318075694","doi":"10.5840/chesterton2004303/466","title":"Judicial Activism: A Threat to Democracy and Religion, Fr. Alphonse de Valk C.S.B., general editor; and Borowski: A Canadian Paradox, by Lianne Laurence","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Chesterton Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Religious studies; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Theology; Politics","score_opus":0.017157626343207603,"score_gpt":0.30371028417381635,"score_spread":0.28655265783060874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318075694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39665124,0.22959201,0.000019298519,0.36967552,0.0007472796,0.0017774403,0.000029101975,0.000089875946,0.0014182278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6795248,0.29836094,0.00046386235,0.018650558,0.002083402,0.00016385174,0.000006141162,0.00002550999,0.0007209576],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984048,0.00023017457,0.00022635238,0.00031706863,0.0002784139,0.00054317294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900943,0.00013145966,0.00008906043,0.00018805126,0.000079648526,0.00050236087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071149686,0.00021244978,0.0003711904,0.00001971864,0.0012306508,0.000113143426,0.0002777395,0.00009959141,0.000021040812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000486751,0.00014137138,0.00006328165,0.0002620368,0.00034242586,0.00019018022,0.000082580314,0.00019118829,0.0000314648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055156164,0.000102813305,0.005472874,0.0008774724,0.0001972049,0.000058941172,0.09501552,0.00000568668,0.0011501751,0.004225832,0.85155123,0.041287113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039574507,0.00009070668,0.011460175,0.0021067178,0.00019969216,0.000022602102,0.00092141767,0.000002280934,0.0001890833,0.0035206494,0.98056734,0.0005236107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3938458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23899657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35102496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037153164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9465295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318457681","doi":"","title":"The Best Interests of the Child in Relocation Disputes: England and Wales, and Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UCL Discovery (University College London)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Adversarial system; Political science; Settlement (finance); Mediation; Statute; Supreme court; Best interests; Law; Normative; Norm (philosophy); Business","score_opus":0.009390052194429704,"score_gpt":0.22812635038529389,"score_spread":0.21873629819086418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318457681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98789877,0.0016114993,2.833446e-7,0.0027014592,0.0004981312,0.00049554947,0.00024029432,0.000006212854,0.006547815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97081435,0.0019024857,0.000004308898,0.000019733305,0.0000510552,0.0000017295291,0.000041843763,0.000006733386,0.027157785],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987999,0.00022409424,0.0001389211,0.0002284556,0.00040544503,0.00020317563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991859,0.00025388313,0.00020177654,0.00014069343,0.00014826331,0.00006947278],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024084038,0.00015474524,0.00023178008,0.000040139268,0.0013213183,0.000053380092,0.00034215208,0.00013722896,0.0000026149403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002832375,0.000107124004,0.000042624113,0.00028010944,0.0003837691,0.00036979458,0.0001340829,0.00025297538,4.880102e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001999358,0.00036990576,0.33796856,0.0009629301,0.0008549501,0.00013680707,0.43836856,0.00004432087,0.00005672253,0.15317799,0.04597521,0.020084683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011168483,0.00003886609,0.43625885,0.00047681175,0.00011809978,0.0000014366949,0.46021172,0.00003153321,0.000009131,0.00034698576,0.101064146,0.00032554296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8837409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99904805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.152831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005775015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063427235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318512819","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007249","title":"Judicial Justification of Recent Developments in Aboriginal Law","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Jurisprudence; Law; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.037825268685473874,"score_gpt":0.2964190730157875,"score_spread":0.25859380433031365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318512819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8334848,0.020442318,0.000011608838,0.036979213,0.0045717703,0.00047509393,0.0001908171,0.000008785769,0.10383557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97856843,0.01459089,0.0007118288,0.0022544155,0.00063606724,0.0000063850707,0.0000074468676,0.000024146657,0.0032003657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972686,0.00025785615,0.0009408139,0.00029586666,0.00024810174,0.0009887267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99699825,0.0001990527,0.0006561202,0.00012929594,0.00071557163,0.0013017277],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013723467,0.00027809665,0.00069564086,0.0000635802,0.00093563524,0.00009366884,0.00036417544,0.00040030913,0.00056474586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001732783,0.0003138109,0.00029041854,0.0005462128,0.0021040917,0.0005539124,0.000017374456,0.00070923247,0.0000071956583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005269615,0.00004856717,0.0009990091,0.0001361153,0.0001969121,0.00007534045,0.25771785,0.000024384371,0.000022382499,0.7273524,0.0027758407,0.010645982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010436202,0.00012265098,0.006127769,0.00053244253,0.00018444045,0.000054411714,0.057359934,0.00006722243,0.000022842085,0.0050802385,0.92892945,0.00047495204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5662624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94500154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92615366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036743716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010697815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320896844","doi":"10.1017/s0008423914000250","title":"Aboriginal Justice and the Charter David Milward Vancouver: UBC Press, 2012, pp. 332.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ontario Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Economic Justice; Political science; Content (measure theory); Media studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.017337701558968875,"score_gpt":0.3046572690903523,"score_spread":0.28731956753138344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320896844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67437154,0.005086073,0.00055632665,0.14597131,0.010232813,0.00082224596,0.000054285698,0.000045738107,0.16285965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957172,0.00012558252,0.0002694469,0.0016421889,0.0011883079,0.0000024347607,7.917668e-8,0.0000045450633,0.0010501966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737453,0.00023953768,0.00028220858,0.00018551489,0.00071243243,0.0012057951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966232,0.00046528762,0.00012751785,0.00012469324,0.0005061496,0.0021531202],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028701918,0.000121778125,0.0002355069,0.0000485358,0.0020930902,0.00034938683,0.0007507506,0.00006162226,0.00010690079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002315241,0.00007204388,0.000075912736,0.00023806698,0.007794447,0.0007178672,0.000023523351,0.00030935887,0.000015576437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008500659,0.000005504785,0.0009572119,0.000008735823,0.00000916964,0.000009882864,0.008319671,0.0000018063989,0.000012569278,0.970226,0.019673513,0.0007674453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007752482,0.00007698604,0.059704956,0.000052051797,0.00015117526,0.000022418033,0.005802661,0.00011241043,0.000034628003,0.009436774,0.9235978,0.00023289709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22010101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2443617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9607892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048357944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014094727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321298248","doi":"10.1017/s071498080000458x","title":"David Snowdon. Aging with Grace: What the Nun Study Teaches Us about Leading Longer, Healthier, and More Meaningful Lives. New York: Bantam Books, 2001.","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.0314946212679264,"score_gpt":0.2672168636944449,"score_spread":0.2357222424265185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321298248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7992018,0.12152812,0.000018695115,0.07262417,0.0034885213,0.0013643968,0.000023046448,0.000037078513,0.0017141652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95805144,0.013237789,0.00045053897,0.004024804,0.0015643254,0.000052705036,0.0000067161004,0.0001243658,0.022487305],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992866,0.001618301,0.0009408459,0.00097130064,0.0005742566,0.0030293192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928967,0.0005370218,0.000732918,0.0005019758,0.00037257926,0.004958808],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004216556,0.00089253596,0.0009689602,0.0003407847,0.0075882706,0.002348927,0.00083738676,0.00020156673,0.0004042245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007110867,0.0006957609,0.00022321676,0.000896619,0.0013245584,0.0010780836,0.00005993572,0.001964835,0.00002598774],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023562054,0.00015195583,0.15113625,0.00018774257,0.0009382205,0.0029773854,0.7771652,0.001128686,0.000007309229,0.0060681156,0.030162781,0.030052798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010832796,0.00046124333,0.029754963,0.0031700803,0.00039487827,0.00071661815,0.34505838,0.00006010294,0.000007715808,0.00009592714,0.6182929,0.00090385566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48734644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9395062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5881302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056867427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023541816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322028740","doi":"10.1080/14622459.2015.1119447","title":"Johannes Oecolampadius. An Exposition of Genesis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reformation and Renaissance Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exposition (narrative); The Renaissance; Philosophy; Theology; Art; Classics; Art history; Literature","score_opus":0.07670250506852559,"score_gpt":0.35806172363447863,"score_spread":0.28135921856595303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322028740","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20723478,0.7289101,0.0003507834,0.01131397,0.0004349049,0.0016585407,0.00001183396,0.00019505892,0.049890038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6891602,0.30963266,0.0005671989,0.00029834145,0.00010783537,0.00003260015,0.000012306383,0.0000041634476,0.0001846843],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915963,0.00016791608,0.00024068981,0.00008187801,0.00023477287,0.000115107454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994165,0.00001340529,0.00016430215,0.00007481481,0.00021350873,0.00011750573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006948272,0.00006728481,0.0002028926,0.000017471843,0.00023903545,0.000018958508,0.000073183655,0.00004205033,0.000025614405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015350587,0.000043804597,0.000036873043,0.00015936802,0.00014085673,0.00063261605,0.000017078382,0.000034659097,0.000017314029],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030634954,0.0002588672,0.0033749589,0.007052035,0.00008583428,0.0000017312831,0.10361497,0.000013562332,0.00039267325,0.027006477,0.027572615,0.8305956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004007263,0.00016021323,0.00954128,0.0031021836,0.000081787664,0.0000044017197,0.011621648,0.00005970308,0.0003518555,0.00038060982,0.9739805,0.00031512743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005302949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016700964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94640785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007021377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003103483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18384916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322625235","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007286","title":"Raven's Garden: A Discussion about Aboriginal Sexual Orientation and Transgender Issues","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sexual orientation; Sociology; Art; Gender studies","score_opus":0.024161955878004696,"score_gpt":0.2980185104206962,"score_spread":0.27385655454269153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322625235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81391364,0.062718414,0.00008405974,0.10297061,0.0037720692,0.0004911232,0.00029283573,0.00001947831,0.015737757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94034654,0.014906875,0.0007615007,0.002350171,0.0016958906,0.0000075587477,0.00001029967,0.000040621577,0.039880574],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728256,0.00031342235,0.0006241539,0.00042458504,0.0002655388,0.0010897123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996703,0.00015565555,0.00039238195,0.00013867625,0.000432056,0.0021782182],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010108901,0.0003738004,0.00067346735,0.000050388193,0.0020325421,0.0003125092,0.00025188227,0.00042470152,0.00074043276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097223136,0.00032378445,0.00032793364,0.00028273716,0.0021847652,0.0007893046,0.000015226741,0.00075873197,0.0000069976],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008364515,0.00003577002,0.0010749964,0.00025756547,0.0004144326,0.00017705,0.77480036,0.000031738586,0.000021465328,0.19703382,0.013350004,0.012794409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001075746,0.00026003344,0.00330063,0.00032408244,0.00032845477,0.00016946282,0.25145996,0.00023252281,0.000003586344,0.0022075549,0.7401068,0.00053112203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23648277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74300283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7267568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015162609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004738576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323209304","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4481","title":"The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Implications for the Equality Rights of Canadians with Disabilities: The Case for Education","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Political science; Balance (ability); Convention; Order (exchange); Human rights; Law; Public administration; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.11678599316186042,"score_gpt":0.37101095248984167,"score_spread":0.2542249593279813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323209304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9601492,0.000119034645,0.00017601052,0.02464636,0.00011362506,0.003994614,0.0004680024,0.000014145427,0.010319007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975496,0.000017218597,0.00010141129,0.00008525232,0.000077606215,0.0008104052,0.000004939639,0.0000067400206,0.0013468383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990693,0.0001770099,0.00023152624,0.00015468022,0.00018095438,0.00018655533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921894,0.0065538506,0.00022446088,0.00026529405,0.0007109432,0.000056069526],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006091733,0.0001060794,0.00013575084,0.00005254824,0.0026867145,0.00006119839,0.00041818607,0.000039035393,0.000019211424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001093278,0.000041160765,0.000055482444,0.00044968797,0.0013922156,0.00017606982,0.000033319393,0.00007049489,3.6528738e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110943816,0.00010007066,0.0008589127,0.00010993897,0.00012466463,3.0308247e-8,0.14612158,0.000027906446,0.000009055123,0.8515449,0.0008892074,0.000102799946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005400964,0.00047876488,0.03372892,0.00020997565,0.0012620836,0.000003465041,0.910684,0.00015846122,0.0006299256,0.012187319,0.03984112,0.00027588764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1771471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41030926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83935755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008315693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018152427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324646733","doi":"10.7202/1035298ar","title":"L’atteinte à la vie familiale au Québec : premier mouvement","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02111040583805925,"score_gpt":0.27059360332440036,"score_spread":0.2494831974863411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324646733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7008989,0.005205973,0.00023621833,0.1073031,0.0019827238,0.0007459554,0.00010111698,0.00016633456,0.18335968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7421522,0.002570488,0.00031237956,0.0003514676,0.001779476,0.00008892095,0.0000024149442,0.000033743258,0.2527089],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680215,0.00045246462,0.000496554,0.0005853942,0.0004615477,0.0012019111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824435,0.00057968573,0.00023601847,0.00036441916,0.00017256365,0.00040299533],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008615955,0.0002898819,0.0005038789,0.000039651328,0.00079419627,0.0000764084,0.0005597105,0.0003536906,0.0012513468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006014892,0.00029102643,0.00037033952,0.0003097807,0.0012777414,0.0004082743,0.00023889985,0.00026954385,0.001868509],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098696066,0.0008591856,0.16877356,0.000804762,0.0009481677,0.00023054678,0.17607963,0.000046974914,0.009205747,0.10919509,0.063483514,0.47027412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079721294,0.00010633984,0.03202245,0.00093842245,0.0001864935,0.000013831651,0.0050987154,0.000036056877,0.000840422,0.005111898,0.9541604,0.0006877693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28729483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30209222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89067686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007747517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006596416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325254138","doi":"10.1177/0037768611402609","title":"Souffrances sociales, parler ordinaire, imaginaires religieux et expression politique","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Social Compass","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.10833119374504901,"score_gpt":0.35214440336960845,"score_spread":0.24381320962455943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325254138","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27408648,0.033119135,0.00030484874,0.13775526,0.009874685,0.0015226017,0.00023763845,0.00090560806,0.5421938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98273546,0.0031997783,0.0010607057,0.0013600155,0.003245573,0.00012321166,0.000016933423,0.00006777393,0.008190538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99436665,0.0016155592,0.00070141116,0.00076389307,0.0010256724,0.0015268365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802685,0.0003170264,0.00053320295,0.00024369688,0.00053572655,0.00034348114],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010658628,0.00063935213,0.00092330255,0.00006533351,0.0038125052,0.0002159068,0.0008512842,0.0006426221,0.0010632584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002986452,0.0006062754,0.0005914029,0.0005571259,0.004592798,0.0010808265,0.00043355025,0.0008760647,0.0005457087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084008425,0.0005518854,0.013188795,0.0001683295,0.0002426963,0.000048156977,0.3035309,0.0000010174016,0.00024204896,0.44778165,0.22594729,0.00821323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011010944,0.00013980937,0.25434792,0.00040703386,0.0002215152,0.000003695325,0.08222045,0.000009957517,0.00080429873,0.13695017,0.5222293,0.0015647712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.102297895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014040257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.708649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009142864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000518635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325547125","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007237","title":"From<i>Terra Nullius</i>to Affirmation: Reconciling Aboriginal Rights with the Canadian Constitution","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Doctrine; Constitution; Ethnology; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.02269755689766165,"score_gpt":0.26277316525921873,"score_spread":0.24007560836155709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325547125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.646274,0.0149470735,0.00008375005,0.23547335,0.0043658293,0.0007676667,0.00067835284,0.00001968557,0.09739033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98041964,0.0006835029,0.0007519184,0.009766819,0.0022913457,0.000012813782,0.000014044262,0.000023112096,0.006036796],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700224,0.0003175213,0.0005963,0.00039344106,0.00030163137,0.0013888914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942773,0.0003403195,0.00044615648,0.00022638531,0.00085535704,0.0038544694],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012052277,0.0004026506,0.00063200714,0.00007038527,0.004976215,0.00055712915,0.00053700415,0.00042303134,0.0011641168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010043997,0.00033343444,0.00034928604,0.00052847614,0.0029411959,0.0008329664,0.000013791747,0.0010416077,0.000042656335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007031121,0.000014119493,0.0003080827,0.000048051526,0.00054527726,0.00031733984,0.5008367,0.00027891825,0.0000043551436,0.44836935,0.04677444,0.0024963694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005976472,0.00013652504,0.00054777134,0.000429767,0.00030540116,0.00017170435,0.05069343,0.00018841226,0.000003986689,0.0020884364,0.9443396,0.00049731764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9868761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99965155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8975652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006352745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026774942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328554993","doi":"","title":"The Civil Justice System and the Public Justice for Nunavummiut: Partnerships for solutions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.08945733938751818,"score_gpt":0.31038670986522016,"score_spread":0.22092937047770198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328554993","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08395679,0.061016344,0.0102573205,0.62287354,0.015329989,0.02459577,0.00090858125,0.0022452124,0.17881647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98816824,0.0008138068,0.000562775,0.0007615507,0.0016148045,0.0011892759,0.000006216239,0.000019779798,0.006863565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976339,0.00044097705,0.00032601203,0.00032239078,0.00043720435,0.0008395425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946306,0.004211172,0.00017456361,0.00026544498,0.00046927846,0.00024895955],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024812461,0.0001929864,0.00027910754,0.000012847798,0.018727986,0.00033143206,0.000515411,0.00013425127,0.00001200611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004503224,0.00010757984,0.00019316307,0.00022260727,0.0022220223,0.00037744505,0.000119836506,0.00022768346,0.00004530358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000619889,0.000018040611,0.00006209271,0.00012911923,0.00007608515,8.3546274e-7,0.005609827,0.0000048016873,0.000005381739,0.950815,0.04305769,0.00015913791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015180499,0.000035078236,0.00030661002,0.00003544765,0.0005249887,0.0000056487784,0.059695683,0.00042459863,0.0000066262273,0.0023509802,0.9348677,0.00022860628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019136096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0392141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94846404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025939106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015280554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9825495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329186767","doi":"10.7870/cjcmh-2002-0028","title":"La Médiation et L'Ajustement à la Rupture D'union: L'impact de la Loi Québécoise Concernant la Médiation Familiale","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Mediation; Political science; Family law; Sociology; Law; Art","score_opus":0.058918860439210755,"score_gpt":0.370431777104138,"score_spread":0.31151291666492725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329186767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8618104,0.029249407,0.000035168778,0.0777402,0.001329021,0.0005489358,0.0004319075,0.000020224437,0.028834743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803446,0.015336127,0.00014534235,0.0028118512,0.00032173248,0.00000543069,0.000029651192,0.000020888585,0.0009843629],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9796924,0.01824727,0.00069967145,0.000097678996,0.0005486096,0.00071437773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960255,0.0011635696,0.00086333643,0.00019333116,0.00023853817,0.0015157408],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072321785,0.00029535688,0.00050701323,0.00014500476,0.0025278092,0.00023769222,0.000549009,0.0003624176,0.00047838522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039119576,0.00027241514,0.00025617378,0.00039130985,0.0009579432,0.0008446729,0.000053014322,0.002028202,0.000032092197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000442812,0.00060466595,0.021585336,0.00031318888,0.00033822592,0.00008934768,0.67917603,0.0005926744,0.000023651566,0.01889803,0.17354068,0.1047939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011184723,0.0004217797,0.10419251,0.0005422427,0.000052515014,0.00015146122,0.078383505,0.00012427618,0.0000058448363,0.00026740346,0.8144811,0.00025889566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71620864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6409404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008074619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005916816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332931160","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x13000902","title":"Joint Assembly of the Anglican Church of Canada and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Synod; Convention; Context (archaeology); General assembly; Religious studies; Political science; Theology; Law; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01756096524075337,"score_gpt":0.2477105737714764,"score_spread":0.23014960853072303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332931160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96276236,0.00029383635,0.0000050618223,0.023380833,0.00020981758,0.00028481724,0.000007595915,0.0000024829667,0.0130531965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99929816,0.000029448176,0.000058140115,0.00036496812,0.00015305457,0.000008043586,1.04950466e-7,0.0000060275315,0.00008205019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975159,0.0005579873,0.00044784677,0.00011740105,0.0009442681,0.00041658655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985333,0.0007549943,0.00017314164,0.000111229696,0.00022280366,0.00020452704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078828604,0.00011385926,0.0003337772,0.000010510326,0.00072943856,0.000046791713,0.00035460992,0.000051420968,0.00021673109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091553933,0.000055496912,0.00007087186,0.00018769423,0.001116494,0.000078627796,0.00010086777,0.00046798354,7.3584874e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004917577,0.00043975996,0.14904425,0.00019434823,0.0008441863,0.00013934592,0.09288232,0.0005188951,0.0068273637,0.6645961,0.059502263,0.024519414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011205967,0.000027744403,0.9686894,0.00008808072,0.000034970824,0.000021071028,0.02429769,0.00030185838,0.00023487095,0.0018501455,0.0031599104,0.00017368187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9994513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8196451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006496936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014193445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56103253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335630380","doi":"10.18290/rnp.2015.25.3-10","title":"Glosa do wyroku Sądu Sprawiedliwości Ontario w sprawie R. v. Wagner z dnia 12.06.2014 (R. v. Wagner, 2015 ONCJ 66)","year":2015,"lang":"pl","type":"article","venue":"Roczniki Nauk Prawnych","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Abortion; Political science; Personhood; Sociology","score_opus":0.05302006514128174,"score_gpt":0.3202284021936201,"score_spread":0.2672083370523384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335630380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50515306,0.040279277,0.00013110497,0.041977823,0.0153536815,0.0064907935,0.00044798088,0.0015793296,0.3885869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7632212,0.0027210247,0.0019124895,0.0016933415,0.005787721,0.00029690444,0.00018624215,0.0002525248,0.22392856],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.983503,0.0018365551,0.002418331,0.003002651,0.0050860266,0.0041534314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908508,0.0009548913,0.0015498574,0.0018862631,0.0019334626,0.0028247198],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046437634,0.0022258633,0.002639692,0.00034224897,0.0038378478,0.0017912457,0.0029990983,0.0020398921,0.004958031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024443408,0.0019401725,0.0011645355,0.0015442482,0.002314388,0.0024937056,0.0018142891,0.0028489341,0.01876362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035603865,0.0011685387,0.037094425,0.00015543969,0.0009015852,0.0002820444,0.12758593,0.00008016884,0.0003463753,0.005563522,0.8207641,0.0057018013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041181077,0.0009524719,0.017430412,0.00031420935,0.0005976379,0.00003887553,0.021656973,0.00007244038,0.00021105379,0.0015043771,0.95034707,0.002756385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3760977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45783752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2580681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006612333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036340589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336348827","doi":"10.1177/0008429816636089","title":"An Inevitable “Marriage March”? A Survey of the “Arbiter of Religious Dogma” in Canadian Case Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mantra; Arbiter; Law; Doctrine; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Context (archaeology); Political science; Expression (computer science); Conversation; State (computer science); Sociology; Common law; Philosophy; History; Theology; Politics","score_opus":0.07874792178434409,"score_gpt":0.3953479752261911,"score_spread":0.316600053441847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336348827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9669704,0.015554702,7.7427904e-7,0.004004181,0.00074326264,0.00076990237,0.00009912293,0.00003327287,0.011824392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764202,0.022908341,0.00015387041,0.00028674107,0.000057808436,0.00006147428,7.8860097e-7,0.000013896006,0.0000968308],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99547374,0.0011163746,0.00089907186,0.0005994198,0.000848418,0.0010629803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965574,0.0018081787,0.00036117635,0.0004961488,0.0005719978,0.00020510954],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041292147,0.0002879845,0.0006793227,0.00028297736,0.0009638337,0.000046108817,0.0011634036,0.00016626282,0.000010990415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005438065,0.0001584936,0.00012200435,0.0023564168,0.006564506,0.00047827786,0.0003577046,0.00019653272,0.000006365005],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051639756,0.00014211617,0.91574204,0.00009468567,0.00007675352,0.00019139769,0.03997421,0.00010009887,0.0005125369,0.027167821,0.015624117,0.0003225661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048147193,0.0016896577,0.6717702,0.005547062,0.000186917,0.0001605089,0.15399987,0.00004140405,0.004698268,0.04175277,0.11179133,0.003547281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9778641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9930348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24397185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071478746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012599044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99613905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336920591","doi":"","title":"White Man's Law: Native People in Nineteenth-Century Canadian Jurisprudence by Sidney Harring (review)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Historical Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; White (mutation); Law; History; Political science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.017781750338795355,"score_gpt":0.2778873941526946,"score_spread":0.2601056438138992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336920591","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002558317,0.8030755,2.5789433e-7,0.069201455,0.0003751193,0.0011086417,0.000070966154,0.000037762748,0.12587447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022734994,0.93203896,0.000058742942,0.028250877,0.00017460392,0.0002044885,0.000034888686,0.000025986128,0.01647643],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688387,0.00039367913,0.000533022,0.00051360164,0.00052903715,0.0011467988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997134,0.00010211748,0.00010558846,0.00026110135,0.00015580306,0.0022413898],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071785616,0.00029639443,0.0007494914,0.000083070416,0.00091193256,0.000038165334,0.00061430567,0.00014844138,0.0058992635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009504246,0.00028124245,0.00018275913,0.0010477871,0.00012087415,0.00027616826,0.000021526053,0.00043507613,0.0005376454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.7024955e-7,0.000015536663,0.0017574058,0.00077326444,0.000015266973,0.00005097032,0.0024732829,5.6304197e-7,2.8332468e-7,0.0009941956,0.9624051,0.031513292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079115045,0.000012265306,0.0010915468,0.0033696922,0.000042362888,0.0000012201052,0.00008320938,0.0000012336951,1.2541022e-7,0.0000122236725,0.9949511,0.0003558777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99873257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1289635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029039426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011635243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337258496","doi":"","title":"Child and Family Service Act 1999(1)Canada. Ontario State","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"神戸学院法学","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Service (business); Business; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.015082151859103329,"score_gpt":0.2460146308977318,"score_spread":0.23093247903862846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337258496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8410633,0.00025085098,0.000004642596,0.01273209,0.0003046777,0.00017494036,0.000005905174,0.000058075664,0.1454055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914784,0.0000870554,0.00013008757,0.0033620547,0.00016543783,0.0000073513947,0.000003355127,0.0000070805145,0.0047592125],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988984,0.00009018324,0.00012116249,0.00020361599,0.00035180335,0.0003348379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952567,0.00008620478,0.00005573261,0.00010310801,0.00007940581,0.00014987824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024565877,0.00011661225,0.00016154294,0.000010212089,0.0010169697,0.000078847756,0.00017638398,0.00004696724,0.00008350047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009149368,0.00009460731,0.000023556511,0.0001194981,0.000114847375,0.00014312187,0.00008214235,0.00015277299,0.00003568732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008054331,0.00014658328,0.2913445,0.000116318704,0.0003702442,0.000020042537,0.49131253,0.00009124378,0.00038993987,0.01726353,0.11872866,0.08013589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014258682,0.000008850819,0.2888306,0.000012099151,0.000008106427,2.4532122e-7,0.0022453014,0.0000092410355,0.000010743395,0.00013583824,0.70847285,0.00012352061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99566424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5897442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003447598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021984402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78218114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338784354","doi":"","title":"‘A Delicate Necessity’: Bruker v. Marcovitz and the Problem of Jewish Divorce","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Judaism; Supreme court; Law; Wife; Political science; Multiculturalism; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.01597244043738162,"score_gpt":0.26823470459476073,"score_spread":0.2522622641573791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338784354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.939717,0.022582669,0.0003587817,0.024911672,0.000087782915,0.00043887505,0.0000017706219,0.000042807587,0.011858666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660171,0.029593512,0.00013793138,0.00013650133,0.00023199557,0.000008073853,3.3542742e-7,0.000007969691,0.0038665754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746656,0.0003486941,0.00026318396,0.00014404116,0.0004502834,0.0013272475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992543,0.00017891862,0.00022629765,0.00007926017,0.00018055446,0.00008066998],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023236815,0.00011767568,0.00023777549,0.000025286185,0.0019308141,0.000045976692,0.00033426555,0.00006798913,0.000023082943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014438468,0.000068609785,0.00011259747,0.00020885991,0.0012940926,0.00023375072,0.000086204396,0.0009173804,0.000007924471],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026940755,0.00012611525,0.06235781,0.00002393524,0.0006742101,0.000008440836,0.08059278,0.000022039909,0.00028518774,0.7847494,0.0018894612,0.069001235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007320635,0.00039514503,0.067856155,0.0001021572,0.00030115034,0.00057145295,0.070835285,0.00006132497,0.000153953,0.73609847,0.1154248,0.0008795048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047576376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009303913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11353534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039502003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069168455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339422365","doi":"10.7202/1035839ar","title":"Natural Law, our Constitutions, and the Unborn","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Law; Natural law; Natural order; Constitutional law; Political science; Freedom of contract; Common law; Sociology; Public law; Philosophy of law","score_opus":0.01625116921654189,"score_gpt":0.2740743816699153,"score_spread":0.2578232124533734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339422365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5484292,0.004772183,0.00015497758,0.228229,0.0012946818,0.0011028042,0.00004253118,0.00029990321,0.21567471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99175715,0.0008061162,0.00018389382,0.00044411572,0.00045050966,0.000030398936,8.1199124e-7,0.000004584162,0.0063223974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908704,0.0001684697,0.00012686197,0.00016209854,0.00015076718,0.00030477598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994166,0.0002601512,0.000057506273,0.000112720045,0.00007136546,0.00008167042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005070348,0.000069629095,0.00015955645,0.000010796757,0.001015677,0.00007119553,0.0001841483,0.00006651014,0.000022774853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005838543,0.00004666144,0.00007414848,0.000101431,0.001171611,0.00017731123,0.00006547171,0.00010672166,0.00008432378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015719625,0.0000074498225,0.0024177737,0.000008053254,0.000030215657,0.0000057967113,0.004689299,3.6058455e-7,0.00015773992,0.98779774,0.001711943,0.0031579053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006341214,0.000051149196,0.045039132,0.00052187056,0.00025139138,0.00007160184,0.039187748,0.00006252522,0.00043410365,0.2497068,0.65723425,0.0010981783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030611781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003848422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73809093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002136839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042238014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7811869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339826288","doi":"","title":"Health and Equality: Is There a Cure?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Scrutiny; Health care; Disadvantaged; Supreme court; Political science; Right to health; Poverty; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.02994081118534909,"score_gpt":0.3591660680267725,"score_spread":0.3292252568414234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339826288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7752404,0.08788907,0.0019435543,0.11548898,0.00038406832,0.00036722343,0.0000028392958,0.00010131046,0.018582541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95795405,0.036322426,0.00008486418,0.00108509,0.0005399759,0.0000011614455,3.8253873e-7,0.000008425356,0.004003638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966109,0.00019340671,0.00023772873,0.00014978656,0.00041599313,0.0023921905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993569,0.00009090745,0.00016148442,0.000058793197,0.00008674915,0.00024516066],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055330945,0.00010816022,0.00018846059,0.000031069358,0.0016436417,0.00008652784,0.00016567131,0.00007289764,0.00004072103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013567883,0.00008138688,0.00007212495,0.00016652787,0.00020005717,0.00018246169,0.000034957124,0.001041928,0.00001895402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041602874,0.000056949368,0.029005595,0.000012357275,0.00020987839,0.000003044341,0.103162676,2.0609885e-7,0.00001846641,0.68255675,0.0019954867,0.18293698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075226306,0.0003472846,0.011225406,0.000043742388,0.00002208521,0.000058969486,0.28636166,0.0000022548095,0.0000133958165,0.20873223,0.49211,0.0003307004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008920254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.066306256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49011454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015490385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014215243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339967095","doi":"10.7202/1035709ar","title":"La trilogie Van Der Peet, Gladstone, Smokehouse et le droit autochtone","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.038837493867990514,"score_gpt":0.30090288030919754,"score_spread":0.262065386441207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339967095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59305096,0.013255609,0.0017973819,0.1589223,0.002378397,0.0013990058,0.00027785156,0.0008330271,0.22808547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8918562,0.005499798,0.0013516566,0.0006825503,0.001221712,0.00011214726,0.000010463852,0.00008498616,0.09918047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953939,0.00095382216,0.00066516676,0.0008437324,0.00061959715,0.0015237905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971124,0.0012150396,0.00037100437,0.00054207334,0.0002388991,0.0005206168],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016334275,0.0004229538,0.00081002165,0.000086891734,0.0008946764,0.0001812863,0.00083252665,0.0007154887,0.00090051093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001370945,0.00045649055,0.00052498135,0.00064296206,0.0018814132,0.00088750734,0.00031295678,0.0005823627,0.0014005105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085828884,0.00075348566,0.010795099,0.0003022818,0.00054618675,0.00037602574,0.01993281,0.000058141868,0.0016521286,0.8530594,0.016821356,0.09561723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036758843,0.0002913812,0.083122574,0.0012876764,0.00050663896,0.00013738773,0.0073319133,0.000111550224,0.0010763754,0.16608278,0.7343567,0.002019161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013539461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064765085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7175353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019021604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045520967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340726912","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2631570","title":"Conscientious Objections by Civil Servants: The Case of Marriage Commissioners and Same Sex Civil Marriages","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Civil servants; Law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Commercial law; Politics","score_opus":0.01921858205091505,"score_gpt":0.2998217048567435,"score_spread":0.28060312280582844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340726912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9481929,0.016165651,0.00024825736,0.019322498,0.0007182603,0.0004652375,0.00003493485,0.000071236806,0.014781026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98629093,0.004032018,0.000030039655,0.00013165634,0.00019018393,0.000007094494,0.0000014875628,0.000010563881,0.00930601],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729407,0.00055187586,0.0002853438,0.00018614845,0.00040747624,0.0012751101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892706,0.00022105456,0.00023481334,0.00012938953,0.00024754042,0.00024013357],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038698928,0.00015070188,0.00022994008,0.000043311473,0.0022007693,0.00014168328,0.00028452752,0.000092486516,0.000065014916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073130056,0.00009657738,0.0000918425,0.00030794798,0.0008563984,0.0002706392,0.00009513786,0.00094292493,0.0000058452774],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026094608,0.0008470074,0.044998463,0.000073704716,0.0026605292,0.0003376239,0.3784878,0.0001177877,0.0030493322,0.24327132,0.26071173,0.06518378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018927541,0.00033962674,0.00040567652,0.00004750488,0.00019425269,0.0017362027,0.78764915,0.00008804268,0.00011553656,0.0783813,0.12871076,0.00043918783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015585435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13546203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40916136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080864754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010889246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341329121","doi":"10.7202/1035669ar","title":"The Human Foetus as a Legal Person","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Civil liberties; Common law; Humanity","score_opus":0.027324038904947157,"score_gpt":0.2939726318116141,"score_spread":0.2666485929066669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341329121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74929583,0.00041879463,0.000017028213,0.031015564,0.00026906477,0.00029004808,0.000005446782,0.0001374912,0.21855071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93298084,0.0003323969,0.000053613578,0.00014679391,0.00084475504,0.000046470184,7.16482e-7,0.000012021523,0.06558242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862117,0.00015262242,0.0001441395,0.00022316197,0.0002815973,0.00057731045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992164,0.0002792143,0.00008628967,0.0001864439,0.00008711806,0.00014457505],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005411753,0.00009263394,0.00015323222,0.000015445674,0.0022168206,0.00015225195,0.0004003279,0.000098486926,0.00018803359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006197831,0.0000685459,0.00014635643,0.00013347823,0.0005109006,0.00021415083,0.000052134226,0.00012108141,0.0004609323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024343077,0.000064415486,0.017381467,0.000025013993,0.00013118914,0.00006523336,0.04923505,7.213931e-7,0.008260691,0.85370487,0.01943792,0.051669065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079317275,0.00012278541,0.05282524,0.00017269261,0.00006363024,0.000017774664,0.025647247,0.0000049673918,0.0008857629,0.042291965,0.8765883,0.00058649515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073125693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006549027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8571504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005963272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057761175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342604572","doi":"10.32920/22057217.v1","title":"Assessing Analogous Grounds: The Doctrinal and Normative Superiority of a Multi-Variable Approach","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Immutability; Charter; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; CLARITY; Constructive; Variable (mathematics); Political science; Normative; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09168106795931515,"score_gpt":0.3661318641658194,"score_spread":0.27445079620650426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342604572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8597675,0.00027460413,0.0009783985,0.0015096938,0.00014276421,0.0004616345,0.0000072577322,0.00017497964,0.13668318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99386144,0.000117529715,0.004719563,0.00005053287,0.000068478614,0.00001958619,0.000002565213,0.0000024201515,0.0011579172],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998858,0.00025099242,0.00016482799,0.00015270128,0.00030057906,0.00027291165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937195,0.00030759812,0.00006470911,0.000078538134,0.00012517779,0.000052013816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010242283,0.00008898966,0.00018009865,0.000026134421,0.0012595006,0.00019036623,0.00016457282,0.000059834718,0.000031726475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036279878,0.000051224575,0.00004141465,0.00062404433,0.0006408775,0.0004910291,0.00012729273,0.00012834345,0.000008297433],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023263847,0.0002656065,0.1771188,0.00018367816,0.00033426206,0.0000071364007,0.53353125,0.00013874192,0.0015087754,0.2771004,0.0017740396,0.008014064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005067163,0.00003140992,0.44054723,0.000021348616,0.00004779788,0.0000020179082,0.54210854,0.0036430522,0.00006798864,0.0007251959,0.012054135,0.00024457424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026095817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017766512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2763752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007194238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005094452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9803895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W234302354","doi":"","title":"Constitutional and Common Law Dialogues between the Supreme Court and Canadian Legislatures","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Legislature; Statutory interpretation; Common law; Constitution; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Sociology","score_opus":0.024447995457764323,"score_gpt":0.2827624268547247,"score_spread":0.25831443139696036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W234302354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8672482,0.019172452,0.00003993357,0.071394786,0.0002708451,0.00031047445,0.000022277707,0.000037021942,0.04150402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98840237,0.010031722,0.000011887368,0.00035692262,0.0007489732,0.0000028495688,0.0000036432198,0.0000035153482,0.0004381379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792457,0.00018578174,0.0001385647,0.00012248887,0.00026898595,0.0013596396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994353,0.00017853771,0.000061361396,0.000049926086,0.00007535686,0.00019948976],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013595799,0.00010911732,0.0001511832,0.000019858777,0.0034861818,0.00019402523,0.00017836706,0.00008979349,0.000017272108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008729727,0.00007065592,0.00003983999,0.00008983944,0.002026923,0.00022621203,0.000030797193,0.0009613949,0.000004690773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004984173,0.000003832918,0.1390692,7.137077e-7,0.00009872518,0.0000036031836,0.0032086466,9.75505e-7,0.0000033903725,0.8539816,0.00033165698,0.0032926316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048084572,0.000084621875,0.12105797,0.000019294614,0.00008816847,0.00016660166,0.015558651,0.0000031324628,0.0000028762058,0.2627865,0.5994866,0.0002647178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42491186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9639009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59915495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073781656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094143307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99781114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343359636","doi":"","title":"Recognizing Indigenous Legal Values in Modern Copyright Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Indigenous; Law; Political science; Legal history; Common law; Jurisprudence; Precedent; Comparative law; Sociology","score_opus":0.11134969897892558,"score_gpt":0.3431590601443749,"score_spread":0.23180936116544934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343359636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991641,0.00021452914,0.000116719515,0.0014764111,0.00038874376,0.00049349264,0.000023498613,0.0002702343,0.0053753736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839994,0.0002779085,0.000053074655,0.0002910996,0.00021344106,0.0000030199365,0.0000038657286,0.0000324347,0.01512581],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996612,0.0007353272,0.00031762474,0.0006689664,0.00068422634,0.0009818276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862444,0.0003110489,0.00019625245,0.00031694805,0.00022408269,0.00032719813],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080465403,0.0003377588,0.00042718442,0.00025513687,0.0013546024,0.00034168293,0.00095612864,0.0003274217,0.0000614514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015136866,0.00027897398,0.00016528029,0.00054148503,0.0007191404,0.0035864096,0.00034638308,0.00044695512,0.000326204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007688103,0.000101426376,0.9705392,0.000017824088,0.00006723696,0.00029882745,0.022608457,0.0000028595362,0.00080708636,0.0017314261,0.0000016821767,0.0037470977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025804883,0.00013472566,0.9406061,0.00058963185,0.0000943046,0.000009127924,0.009150139,1.4782539e-7,0.0020457308,0.0025711004,0.04103753,0.001180982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012261595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12793139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12670523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012601747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016247264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344576478","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Coalescence: Substantive Equality as a Principle of Fundamental Justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Jurisprudence; Substantive rights; Subordination (linguistics); Constitutional right; Sociology; Law and economics; Human rights; Supreme court","score_opus":0.0343273714856297,"score_gpt":0.3579474696438073,"score_spread":0.3236200981581776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344576478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798507,0.0015818137,0.0022477352,0.0034796891,0.00043385662,0.00024781429,0.000023480306,0.000037185713,0.012097692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99323624,0.0038599186,0.000071725255,0.000054466,0.00032359367,0.0000045338593,8.391115e-7,0.0000039316787,0.0024447218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695516,0.00029458353,0.00032253153,0.00017682467,0.00071863434,0.0015322586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998955,0.00023863041,0.00028012088,0.00007369459,0.00032966104,0.00012286328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023504228,0.00012585903,0.0002081984,0.000024421177,0.0011000294,0.00003318484,0.00028833063,0.00008293135,0.00022398209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007932622,0.000080670245,0.00013113656,0.00016971548,0.0020880832,0.0003408092,0.000055820212,0.0005257697,0.0000758315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006589487,0.00006717184,0.016060853,0.000005493537,0.00012071319,0.0000018885742,0.0027640443,7.2975075e-7,0.0013218455,0.97783554,0.000035946396,0.0017198651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0072778026,0.0012648001,0.052268777,0.0005617697,0.0006695784,0.00031626882,0.2847666,0.0000057139487,0.00303425,0.4416505,0.20664558,0.0015383452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008136097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038275104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.536185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025847023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029442208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8460648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344958744","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fww005","title":"CONVERTING THE ‘RIGHT TO LIFE’ TO THE ‘RIGHT TO PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE AND EUTHANASIA’: AN ANALYSIS OF<i>CARTER V CANADA</i>(<i>ATTORNEY GENERAL</i>)<i>,</i>SUPREME COURT OF CANADA: Table 1.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Charter; Majority opinion; Constitutional right; Legislation; Economic Justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.032031938815030116,"score_gpt":0.30743284443337116,"score_spread":0.275400905618341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344958744","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11445723,0.027914101,0.00017371301,0.84109133,0.00080119784,0.0030066154,0.00044718737,0.00005044748,0.01205817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89317125,0.0019210622,0.00010062044,0.103331394,0.0004116253,0.00011419172,0.000008570855,0.000018042703,0.0009232663],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957586,0.0006673761,0.0007322491,0.00040565268,0.001820319,0.0006157863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974954,0.00055179314,0.00023792958,0.00044924513,0.0004259727,0.0008396466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019751105,0.00023896479,0.001007884,0.000023345894,0.0007439785,0.000028322558,0.00084672624,0.000066279696,0.00045359175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020100411,0.00010313818,0.00013356442,0.0012330479,0.00038225984,0.00009765155,0.00019524054,0.00013690011,0.0000050162234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046949637,0.00017090367,0.008558331,0.0008623968,0.0030102993,0.000052118736,0.008915166,0.000035926234,0.0017049655,0.048681915,0.8894896,0.038471427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011044833,0.000029941175,0.007941698,0.0009345162,0.000647101,4.559216e-7,0.0003754098,0.000017289927,0.00031476727,0.000007891962,0.9894126,0.00020784736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9832842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.778714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040277783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014123394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5722156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346090139","doi":"10.3138/ctr.166.001c","title":"<i>C-24 Squib</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Theatre Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Citizenship; Class (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Political science; Aesthetics; Gender studies; Art; Visual arts; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.035255031080970924,"score_gpt":0.30235308847041087,"score_spread":0.2670980573894399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346090139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041085482,0.30875447,0.0000036050972,0.20140575,0.0005627328,0.0007225121,0.00004277217,0.00009160457,0.4880057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20549715,0.7465745,0.0001501718,0.018904865,0.0009954455,0.0001190077,0.0000041599747,0.000031790554,0.027722893],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987418,0.0001870941,0.00016573758,0.00019098938,0.00020377895,0.0005105761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990092,0.000103229904,0.000045247714,0.00018299972,0.000079035344,0.00058032095],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045215592,0.00011645813,0.00024767284,0.000023624832,0.00057962525,0.000026457603,0.00028044078,0.00006135885,0.0019566338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026947472,0.00006599231,0.00012411861,0.00022934462,0.00024981407,0.00013519064,0.000018979836,0.000060226404,0.0015103784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.133788e-7,0.00000495849,0.0014041899,0.00020448415,0.000030908504,0.000015172815,0.001127947,1.052356e-8,0.000013304743,0.014417953,0.3595815,0.62319905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056014167,0.000005049134,0.00025050054,0.0013489003,0.000027710788,9.318088e-7,0.00017846859,1.5804334e-8,0.0000033425129,0.00023537982,0.997761,0.00013265807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2577848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70346045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63817954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065189786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039594635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2356352757","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14637276.v1","title":"The impact of volunteer community service programs on students in Toronto's secondary schools","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Public sector; Voluntary sector; Service (business); Immigration; Public relations; Business; Turnover; Private sector; Economic growth; Political science; Public administration; Marketing; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.05314170820523266,"score_gpt":0.40763984859917246,"score_spread":0.3544981403939398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2356352757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9304072,0.0010721569,4.7923675e-7,0.0012314155,0.00033048732,0.0011816525,0.000016480799,0.000058784335,0.06570129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756664,0.00080138235,0.00008979618,0.00011707673,0.000103490565,0.00014108777,0.000035863144,0.000013616016,0.0011310391],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611986,0.0017554052,0.00045094042,0.00027398556,0.0009252446,0.0004745432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980289,0.00040577393,0.00026595587,0.000597179,0.0005818998,0.00012030775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002119204,0.00029561808,0.0005147058,0.000014886351,0.0011442822,0.00052222825,0.0016949933,0.0003337588,0.0005233316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004719745,0.00017433813,0.00031923907,0.0002044816,0.00024932894,0.00021222312,0.0020233437,0.0020944197,0.000013917217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000122068384,0.0021497167,0.4942867,0.0002553066,0.0014352744,0.000007833791,0.4624555,0.00018178707,0.00003500482,0.0009271056,0.0025248968,0.035618793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002860001,0.00007854614,0.6696695,0.000287694,0.000019078763,8.848219e-8,0.3283413,0.000012306361,0.000009525677,0.00019256165,0.00087493507,0.000228418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93803054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91879904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17538284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028580655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053666957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9099328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W235819439","doi":"","title":"The Covenanters in Canada: Reformed Presbyterianism from 1820 to 2012 by Eldon Hay (review)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hay; History; Ancient history; Political science; Animal science; Biology","score_opus":0.007249275033467997,"score_gpt":0.21530103784321944,"score_spread":0.20805176280975143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W235819439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8032849,0.03582803,0.0003002248,0.06088631,0.001990819,0.0024971338,0.00035936348,0.000108412016,0.09474481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904839,0.003599094,0.00017912763,0.0004737586,0.000067321416,0.0000014094983,0.000008858194,0.000005765625,0.0051807635],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888265,0.00022528459,0.0001354009,0.00016695586,0.00030442598,0.00028526658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993975,0.00015373479,0.00010035715,0.00015335281,0.000066059736,0.00012898742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002572002,0.00009479256,0.00021325663,0.000004242758,0.0004391768,0.000012801245,0.00046584342,0.00004173601,0.00028727404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052315292,0.0000744975,0.000050136176,0.000033719833,0.00012630566,0.00029037177,0.00003466572,0.000057982565,0.000014468972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012862237,0.000060175604,0.002718878,0.000058710855,0.00012649946,0.000007931027,0.14022382,0.0000014097648,0.00068489526,0.0013111265,0.73589283,0.118785135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028592383,0.00009201496,0.03327312,0.00012799552,0.00001911842,4.0572754e-8,0.048040174,0.000007704312,0.000010118703,0.0000283115,0.91797465,0.00014085355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9987309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18719901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017355611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016675935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45384318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2375106198","doi":"10.3138/jrpc.27.3.3219","title":"From<i>Holy Grail</i>to<i>The Lost Gospel</i>: Margaret Starbird and Mary Magdalene Scholarship","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religion and Popular Culture","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gospel; Legend; Scholarship; Holy Grail; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Romance; Literature; Theology; Classics; History; Philosophy; Art; Law","score_opus":0.031268871926420874,"score_gpt":0.3027743432955597,"score_spread":0.27150547136913883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2375106198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93491894,0.032583427,0.000015559279,0.030040298,0.0007651476,0.00026044206,0.00002841365,0.000022178114,0.0013656163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9399113,0.038582664,0.0033863266,0.005910285,0.0029205994,0.0000036003673,0.000010597939,0.000027849745,0.009246797],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981445,0.0003179625,0.00034441322,0.00018960056,0.0007238609,0.00027965286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986379,0.000032398602,0.00026348527,0.00011684172,0.00042349068,0.0005258581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010357788,0.00018601769,0.00031456928,0.000039032657,0.0005197494,0.00030635978,0.00028683164,0.00018503687,0.0000120556815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000686247,0.000106336265,0.000107331776,0.00022216131,0.00018809552,0.00044027955,0.00010817338,0.00054146745,0.000037448488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000230973,0.00005415265,0.052268706,0.000020131081,0.00014715079,0.00012492838,0.07377848,0.000005151517,0.00073283375,0.0029356964,0.866139,0.0035628038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005942778,0.00014729056,0.009177564,0.00009678754,0.000078684396,0.00003520452,0.006836692,8.771654e-7,0.000037466543,0.0025545203,0.9802595,0.00018117126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018609699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001586645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.114120476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010636058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005359042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4336267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W23785182","doi":"","title":"Sexual assault, domestic violence and HIV: promoting women's rights through legislation.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Human rights; Political science; Law; Domestic violence; Presentation (obstetrics); Sexual assault; Poison control; Criminology; Sociology; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Environmental health","score_opus":0.036305310073052176,"score_gpt":0.27759123139270575,"score_spread":0.24128592131965357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W23785182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.986899,0.0005187864,0.000026768412,0.001503357,0.00020434016,0.0007499498,0.0000042039073,0.00015755277,0.009936037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957014,0.00023556233,0.0003274912,0.000100570665,0.00036528005,0.0007859614,0.0000018257496,0.0000069193793,0.0024749888],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982259,0.00015020854,0.0001867661,0.00029701873,0.00049711036,0.00064297556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932426,0.00020805304,0.000100050594,0.00009016331,0.00011179675,0.00016565637],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005049736,0.00013545211,0.0001891547,0.000018985545,0.0018367486,0.00007102526,0.00015408019,0.00009464039,0.00002403402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064797106,0.00010482192,0.00002427485,0.0002277374,0.0006317517,0.00054938917,0.00006934242,0.00015563802,0.000022422846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003602161,0.00024918432,0.14995247,0.00006792053,0.00018954446,0.00011150034,0.7185312,0.000022433393,0.000045766057,0.009731502,0.0028706603,0.11819182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088235934,0.000035648278,0.8810981,0.000042514712,0.00002883311,0.000016886002,0.015176799,0.00004319671,0.00005693714,0.007258287,0.094755,0.00060544984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021270127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004121688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7311456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002609271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003236632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2385140027","doi":"","title":"On Development Course of Canada's Constitution and the Reasons of Constitwtioal Success","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of North China Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Constitution; Constitutionalism; Law; State (computer science); Foundation (evidence); Political science; Public administration; Democracy","score_opus":0.013072475064588546,"score_gpt":0.2291906149794465,"score_spread":0.21611813991485795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2385140027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927047,0.0010677124,0.000047347185,0.000950268,0.0003831617,0.00020537221,0.000009411576,0.000003376589,0.004628666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990915,0.000527167,0.00022535386,0.00006215173,0.000023614786,0.0000019934942,9.510784e-7,0.0000028661473,0.000064382904],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852914,0.000118008014,0.00060363824,0.00010644303,0.00040681535,0.00023598188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987869,0.0001138169,0.0005504717,0.000079802805,0.00036114824,0.00010784543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006594618,0.00014299747,0.00047524454,0.000063850704,0.0004336227,0.000010292161,0.00019697301,0.000053316864,0.000020255153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025893404,0.00007629155,0.00006938018,0.00015256752,0.0019689198,0.00024372652,0.00004110442,0.00019491011,1.546517e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034166265,0.00096967805,0.75452745,0.00034243453,0.0021167086,0.00016222507,0.1252129,0.00016374982,0.00029438638,0.1012291,0.0019671535,0.009597617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046632895,0.00054495735,0.9623976,0.00049204956,0.0003498349,0.000096368196,0.0011867952,0.000022413404,0.0080542825,0.001527629,0.020257078,0.00040771422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.089847066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23556344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20787016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007004336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010888189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91621375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W239116906","doi":"","title":"R. v. Ryan Duress is Not Necessary Where Necessity is Sufficient","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Surprise; Law; Relevance (law); Commit; Psychology; Political science; Criminology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.040929138952410835,"score_gpt":0.29336164553016675,"score_spread":0.2524325065777559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W239116906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.788199,0.0019559364,0.000018426299,0.010888311,0.0011412965,0.000577894,0.00008106718,0.00037672743,0.19676133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794966,0.00045772368,0.00058344484,0.004750202,0.00059056113,0.000043905573,0.0000042548713,0.00002723188,0.014046102],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967868,0.0002977792,0.00040222367,0.0006452149,0.0009836111,0.00088441453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843156,0.00010852428,0.00021388053,0.0004409388,0.00029654737,0.0005085716],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006491803,0.00033109775,0.00041770097,0.000034028868,0.0024431637,0.00024583808,0.0008674209,0.00029028227,0.0072423676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020152777,0.00027707146,0.0002394693,0.00040137942,0.00086019625,0.0007193863,0.00031161943,0.00048341724,0.001604129],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019838959,0.0009960354,0.18689483,0.00019806832,0.00040125512,0.00010114931,0.34706256,0.000005724657,0.0008097231,0.11977185,0.34017894,0.0033814823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008487319,0.00010200405,0.11377586,0.00013156566,0.000098903976,0.0000018075472,0.028377637,0.000016561975,0.0045873653,0.0014213828,0.8496361,0.0010020899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.122366816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04262923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5094572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029205103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011012788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2392342701","doi":"","title":"Canada Apologizes to Chinese Community for Discriminatory Laws","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"中国妇女(英文版)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Citizenship; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.03447134572658721,"score_gpt":0.32896070499012336,"score_spread":0.29448935926353614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2392342701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9472658,0.00024193381,0.00003175617,0.017252509,0.00055406854,0.0005953803,0.000095430325,0.000100621546,0.033862498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917785,0.000010941166,0.00055291003,0.0010856236,0.00039985814,0.00010404014,0.000018017297,0.000010560687,0.006039583],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986483,0.0002443071,0.0001799405,0.00015880453,0.00031294327,0.0004557265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896896,0.0005230886,0.000060782895,0.00018200923,0.00013639219,0.00012875583],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004440119,0.00015413326,0.00022663317,0.000017598708,0.0022675744,0.000057703946,0.00040792336,0.000075693155,0.0000581576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006751202,0.000114759285,0.00007720849,0.00017806602,0.00026752212,0.000109998495,0.0001264421,0.00017639008,0.000014109524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062708175,0.00029494974,0.071490705,0.00009421439,0.00008193094,0.00000753924,0.094159156,0.000062545216,0.00079582044,0.04132006,0.7867898,0.0048406227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028886407,0.000047603884,0.27688166,0.000013744933,0.000018457647,2.4630558e-7,0.0368762,0.000007195077,0.00012285716,0.0021606407,0.68327796,0.00030455395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99821615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20539097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005040492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021165937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99903136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2395633455","doi":"","title":"Culture, Religion and the Ordinary Person: An Essay on R. v. Humaid","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Doctrine; Law; Politics; Relevance (law); Identity (music); Political science; Test (biology); Sociology","score_opus":0.015711832808209494,"score_gpt":0.2978013009644423,"score_spread":0.2820894681562328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2395633455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79789686,0.028802112,0.00009634328,0.08305563,0.00041068683,0.00059839175,0.0000013803749,0.00014800575,0.08899056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970962,0.021127008,0.000037924194,0.0008373098,0.0008510835,0.0000034610077,8.608656e-7,0.000006382065,0.006173986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746037,0.00043523268,0.00014174012,0.00018554214,0.00042349537,0.0013535953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952775,0.00006677684,0.0001152524,0.00009158223,0.000093243296,0.00010537804],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022786476,0.00014473453,0.00018293316,0.000024589874,0.0027558047,0.00016972223,0.00027986127,0.00009349229,0.000013056204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018011092,0.00007808301,0.00010288391,0.00014859441,0.00035969596,0.00029963744,0.000014710959,0.0013200684,0.000014088618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001753604,0.000052757,0.00017679352,8.52387e-7,0.000058493206,0.000003587252,0.033359762,0.0000041412363,0.000044765777,0.9393254,0.0017170778,0.02508104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003709844,0.0023215238,0.005028076,0.000055539705,0.00012791871,0.00017748427,0.16197225,0.0000315659,0.000024366902,0.7159183,0.11006579,0.00056730956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010891542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034696206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22340705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093304564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037720992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2395940210","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_104546","title":"What Is Good for a Person","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05253140270650852,"score_gpt":0.3381349404542387,"score_spread":0.2856035377477302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2395940210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17549333,0.0010725004,0.001299807,0.21569051,0.0024858247,0.0014188659,0.0000061224746,0.00043304544,0.60209996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92547977,0.0001738223,0.0015154284,0.0020339622,0.00050870125,0.00004598143,9.1710046e-7,0.0000053027647,0.07023612],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993746,0.00004195969,0.000055357807,0.00013140899,0.00017293161,0.0002236966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962145,0.00015933633,0.000024496028,0.000053515887,0.00008050045,0.00006069695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002922784,0.000057891328,0.000092064634,0.00000684875,0.0006754469,0.00016123742,0.00010978343,0.000051944735,0.00035974872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001740491,0.000040631767,0.00007556111,0.000057438483,0.00010763009,0.00033409998,0.000014879155,0.000030729236,0.00010926175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012508924,0.00006178074,0.0044074315,0.000029816176,0.00007959274,1.8387148e-7,0.42810437,8.161523e-7,0.00022780702,0.30872765,0.15418002,0.10416803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017941649,0.000031363325,0.0014918114,0.000008148431,0.000009674193,3.229382e-8,0.10158286,0.00006312185,0.00015618473,0.0008278237,0.8955471,0.00010244383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031857926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028791626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7499864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010212784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.519506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2396333428","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal Rights, Collective Rights, and Adjudicative Virtues","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Adjudication; Economic Justice; Human rights; International human rights law","score_opus":0.016268224519584186,"score_gpt":0.3151240322686559,"score_spread":0.29885580774907167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2396333428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87741643,0.022587955,0.0008639036,0.009192658,0.000842463,0.0007065045,0.000010258771,0.00018277935,0.08819704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97665346,0.003955694,0.00026858196,0.00006924992,0.00090725423,0.000016585767,0.0000013982741,0.000010344231,0.018117432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965665,0.00041528526,0.00022929737,0.00025786547,0.000630637,0.0019004509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988086,0.0001328128,0.0001962447,0.00007805936,0.00045306893,0.00033121696],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002063746,0.00019299667,0.00027311005,0.000069204114,0.0023356702,0.00014957516,0.00028396002,0.000116011346,0.000033317076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014841206,0.00013596861,0.000079060286,0.00035170332,0.00070958654,0.0004869028,0.000027204002,0.0012561356,0.000051450093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013612251,0.00010026661,0.0033603106,0.000002063983,0.000491682,0.000011460291,0.09348538,0.0000027837173,0.000023800474,0.8939104,0.005633697,0.0028420335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008395729,0.00029643995,0.0012841574,0.000015434365,0.000060262497,0.00004218099,0.030477716,0.000005407602,0.00003960529,0.71814644,0.24853972,0.00025308595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014503089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049437743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24290602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004132201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003077888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399953505","doi":"","title":"Alberta law confining child prostitutes upheld.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Charter; Political science; Queen (butterfly); High Court","score_opus":0.03526355413524654,"score_gpt":0.26950430145770615,"score_spread":0.2342407473224596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399953505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053759255,0.00045721317,0.0000032869077,0.020374265,0.00050418644,0.0008394525,0.0000022290485,0.00013988375,0.9239202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976579,0.00016221411,0.000052901047,0.000953012,0.0005521035,0.00070805073,0.0000030712226,0.000007956233,0.020981684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865943,0.00007543612,0.00015174143,0.00021766046,0.0003033984,0.0005923365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942625,0.00017349512,0.00006289153,0.00010096175,0.00006968762,0.00016670542],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035251776,0.00011403701,0.00015906003,0.00001426625,0.0013359331,0.00013816856,0.00021743182,0.00008226501,0.0001491056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007093286,0.0000922983,0.00006689599,0.00019301899,0.00047098487,0.00027767924,0.000063497086,0.00012746903,0.00010819071],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044806984,0.00017135715,0.083662584,0.000022703229,0.00020995074,0.00002734233,0.056505643,0.000014381302,0.000008753318,0.7168021,0.014551003,0.12797934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019833531,0.0000036542863,0.1024484,0.000006951287,0.000013659292,0.0000013931278,0.0020326504,0.0000013471582,0.000035722267,0.0003168715,0.8947851,0.00015593374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06399188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06461112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92281973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001076895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001387959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404168557","doi":"10.82308/19192","title":"The covenant chain of peace : metaphor and religious thought in seventeenth century Haudenosaunee council oratory","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University at Buffalo; McGill University; State University of New York","keywords":"Covenant; Metaphor; Context (archaeology); Politics; Sociology; Political science; History; Law; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022256558091716356,"score_gpt":0.26569021078498783,"score_spread":0.24343365269327147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2404168557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9282935,0.032476287,2.0638655e-8,0.00025573754,0.0016686396,0.0016004397,0.0005042324,0.00012970285,0.035071425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94506353,0.04714328,0.00009730214,0.00011316589,0.00007727543,0.00017146567,0.00008635405,0.000088319706,0.0071593337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936837,0.0009985582,0.0010783215,0.0009029718,0.0023456004,0.0009908386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99657404,0.00067271915,0.00094082253,0.00046403214,0.0010627621,0.00028564193],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040721865,0.00068159844,0.0009791746,0.000120735385,0.0031539435,0.00014532561,0.0008486694,0.00075022096,0.000025453694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036079718,0.00051234494,0.00034846363,0.0007996649,0.0005517594,0.0004749929,0.00018162698,0.0013819453,0.00003295278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023588268,0.0020235886,0.0016978482,0.002842834,0.003207498,0.00051933277,0.0333151,0.00017043603,0.02193741,0.7381286,0.00075682544,0.1930417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001783488,0.00015271711,0.0063036005,0.0011195373,0.00035846382,0.0000047416265,0.054080512,0.0000025276345,0.004110207,0.008539314,0.922188,0.0013568982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019083656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1676425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9214312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043894565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005574566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404579432","doi":"","title":"Morgentaler v. The Queen in the Supreme Court of Canada.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Abortion; Political science; Constitutional right; Politics; Majority opinion; High Court; Supreme Court Decisions; State (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.024900903398976056,"score_gpt":0.24509484413166516,"score_spread":0.2201939407326891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2404579432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8154451,0.000309308,5.162643e-7,0.087346934,0.0002383781,0.00093388965,0.00001103656,0.000013163732,0.09570164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995093,0.00001749954,0.000003821879,0.00030563763,0.00015954403,0.00028220133,0.0000010501772,0.0000023956352,0.0041348645],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888164,0.00017080076,0.00012819865,0.000075613025,0.00043883262,0.00030492328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996321,0.00016902488,0.0000494929,0.000084652514,0.000040843046,0.00002387479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007003532,0.000052914234,0.00008229249,0.000006606949,0.0003448689,0.000021683074,0.00030068896,0.00002555383,0.000022014694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001707939,0.00002595991,0.000029416156,0.0001833314,0.00023100665,0.000048869915,0.000027882264,0.00007610191,0.0000010556889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013353219,0.00011909937,0.38587636,0.000013094715,0.000053977332,0.000009014088,0.040750433,0.0000861097,0.000012811461,0.03322573,0.53455335,0.0052866973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006223576,5.5839143e-7,0.82976866,8.9243616e-7,0.0000044440035,7.66268e-8,0.008258816,0.0000010152419,0.000023756753,0.00022526066,0.16161749,0.000036788035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9655509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98358244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4438923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020137247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070594644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26524875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404693224","doi":"10.51644/9780889207288","title":"Ritual and Ethnic Identity","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnic group; Identity (music); Sociology; Anthropology; Genealogy; Gender studies; History; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.0522980631230016,"score_gpt":0.3530813909246451,"score_spread":0.30078332780164346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2404693224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034990796,0.0032207288,0.000010851534,0.0009199328,0.00029872052,0.00026483292,0.000012182936,0.00013184363,0.994791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009043629,0.00093117385,0.00014184673,0.00014915265,0.0008995954,0.000008027866,0.000014499818,0.000010744846,0.9969406],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987021,0.00007288349,0.00016752415,0.00026225057,0.0005198004,0.00027541953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994993,0.00014201285,0.000086649954,0.000083305495,0.00010203359,0.00008667747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033069553,0.0001704129,0.00028791145,0.000024552979,0.00070353434,0.00011943588,0.0001964485,0.0003669911,0.00054205005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012598195,0.00013668265,0.000092877446,0.00006766294,0.00075293065,0.00026714595,0.0001490174,0.000268442,0.00021314566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011506958,0.000011422746,0.00018364348,0.000026630467,0.000046302386,0.000005212322,0.0055389823,1.12083605e-7,0.0000010634692,0.2079115,0.7831932,0.0030807916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009282468,0.000007855976,0.004518424,0.000024337105,0.000041631105,2.1371422e-7,0.00090429245,2.956051e-7,4.0818102e-7,0.013684081,0.9804925,0.00023315892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02258295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12641892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19729929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035680394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011654683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98392576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404780777","doi":"","title":"Confounding Concepts: The Judicial Definition of the Constitutional Protection of the Aboriginal Right to Self-Government in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Test (biology); Constitutional law; Power (physics); Corporate governance; Separation of powers; Economics; Constitution; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.011082575285527162,"score_gpt":0.2774948458354345,"score_spread":0.26641227054990735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2404780777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9752276,0.00030265315,0.00015902,0.017170893,0.0005878846,0.0006078286,0.000008999377,0.0000046530567,0.0059304647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993148,0.00020850885,0.000018264162,0.00020386852,0.00019591063,0.000006312322,1.33138e-7,0.000001634693,0.000050580227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977912,0.00029184134,0.0002639758,0.00008410999,0.00093343144,0.0006354484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994403,0.00007260821,0.0002677995,0.00006712455,0.00012202145,0.000030156805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011580659,0.00008064161,0.00012331226,0.000009775417,0.0010606669,0.00001985864,0.00032168077,0.000034454402,0.000017431752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018743491,0.00003941121,0.00007317662,0.00030283068,0.00037164305,0.00008594012,0.000018387793,0.00069220184,5.926649e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003478383,0.00003488246,0.00957394,0.0000021185008,0.00005577308,3.7845587e-7,0.0044472734,0.00013595163,0.0007203207,0.9840005,0.000094459094,0.0008995852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030799522,0.00060584914,0.37313187,0.00052455283,0.00027477954,0.00012237305,0.18992113,0.000076439224,0.0062519643,0.35541415,0.06988996,0.00070696935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49494466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9328319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6285864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075850515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008111693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2405232763","doi":"","title":"Appeals heard on both medical and non-medical marijuana.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; RAID; Criminology; Political science; History; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04136158710680948,"score_gpt":0.2860121161173894,"score_spread":0.24465052901057993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2405232763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49089825,0.0014262744,0.000013864724,0.21677817,0.00097360014,0.0012833747,0.0000061040996,0.00024233165,0.288378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889135,0.001225261,0.000034735498,0.0028673203,0.0006241601,0.00031713347,8.5333835e-7,0.00000849134,0.006008582],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972728,0.0001579887,0.00018866801,0.00026379855,0.0015117069,0.0006050309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987813,0.0003060397,0.000043930777,0.0000966285,0.00003146722,0.0007406042],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011328709,0.00012044789,0.00022122846,0.000026388996,0.0005713579,0.000070776165,0.00024778547,0.00022298221,0.001247899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002744876,0.00008889644,0.00005788874,0.00016450883,0.00067362597,0.00009827958,0.00011065615,0.00027517724,0.00014053739],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019403535,0.00024488042,0.03247158,0.000030912335,0.00010129807,0.00011923876,0.011462312,3.0566005e-7,5.5063884e-7,0.00439195,0.1329919,0.81816566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005852081,0.000022052698,0.6057089,0.000027463851,0.000012831185,0.000002834175,0.0013176999,0.00008149005,0.00000252769,0.00016624179,0.39185506,0.00021770614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029576605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018531054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.817948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012134273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023089246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2406190884","doi":"","title":"Saskatchewan Court of Appeal: marriage commissioners cannot discriminate.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thales (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Charter; Law; Political science; Legislation; High Court","score_opus":0.07221442806542154,"score_gpt":0.27942089039365814,"score_spread":0.20720646232823658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2406190884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5463972,0.00048047808,0.00002822672,0.0071979123,0.001040821,0.0016354672,0.000035091565,0.00022831224,0.4429565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991442,0.000050177594,0.00028093375,0.000094644914,0.0001067048,0.00029284772,0.000002571499,0.000010144367,0.0077199466],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985672,0.00015330996,0.00022210288,0.00018127605,0.00038671834,0.0004893454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993248,0.000055380344,0.00013217525,0.00014426667,0.00010788969,0.00023548564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064623024,0.0001193183,0.00022302178,0.00002888946,0.0004202011,0.000020014557,0.00032891028,0.0000884229,0.00015166301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002815202,0.000090541864,0.00008974996,0.0001778161,0.000585379,0.00015383343,0.00009799056,0.00011250651,0.000012556582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011499006,0.00044410408,0.07138534,0.00010538771,0.00025384227,0.00002095336,0.6661694,0.0000012591012,0.00012282206,0.012450674,0.048472054,0.20045918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034090434,0.000014157751,0.76427406,0.000012981547,0.000052981035,2.9752454e-7,0.1304493,0.000001274995,0.00081516674,0.000987748,0.10279889,0.00025226385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066671304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014995481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6928887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014803381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054768854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9395438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2416192451","doi":"","title":"\"Bad law\" argument in Morgentaler v. The Queen.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Law; Supreme court; Appeal; Statute; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Duty; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03335720739152955,"score_gpt":0.28158105417311385,"score_spread":0.2482238467815843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2416192451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61446846,0.0007892019,0.0000015318568,0.11360656,0.00045255522,0.0015594988,0.0000035523558,0.000099572506,0.2690191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98927534,0.00011751135,0.000038019876,0.0012406656,0.00040969683,0.00096837996,6.782856e-7,0.000004609212,0.007945103],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988413,0.00012729056,0.00013830554,0.00013920973,0.0003151064,0.00043882002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996927,0.000074508425,0.00003804831,0.00009025602,0.00002534675,0.000079180645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005707532,0.000077178134,0.000095861,0.000011606728,0.00048345016,0.00006012671,0.00021809601,0.000045754467,0.00010152514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000117676405,0.00004763737,0.000051188847,0.00015226728,0.00028590366,0.0001647771,0.000063876396,0.000110265195,0.000097118405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034434437,0.00048551025,0.14144197,0.000012698714,0.00015267413,0.000011285648,0.14686151,0.00014936314,0.000022384715,0.24330932,0.0563923,0.41112655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013790063,0.0000012034857,0.4472225,0.000001497321,0.00000438648,7.587122e-8,0.0030866438,0.0000021463266,0.000053479383,0.00020222877,0.5492154,0.00007257906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024132157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04453989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49282306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039132414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000095494315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9823662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2417315670","doi":"10.1093/pch/21.5.245","title":"Toward the full and proper implementation of Jordan's Principle: An elusive goal to date","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paediatrics & Child Health","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Payment; Tribunal; Political science; Service (business); Law; Service provider; House of Commons; Public administration; Business; Politics; Economics; Economy; Finance","score_opus":0.0342140601147113,"score_gpt":0.3676809689479009,"score_spread":0.33346690883318963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2417315670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8681748,0.00079369836,0.00008947711,0.12854883,0.00024196578,0.0013471151,0.00007178321,0.000039166505,0.0006931749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947384,0.002722321,0.0006325504,0.0011228165,0.00067759224,0.000037139667,0.000004573825,0.00000884564,0.000055751923],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830484,0.00029760876,0.0003003803,0.00024793635,0.00043740147,0.00041185415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991118,0.00013335657,0.00021045384,0.00013563858,0.00017099277,0.00023780698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011752663,0.00011097498,0.00018672884,0.000037162026,0.00090755755,0.000035743797,0.00022019632,0.00004212943,0.00004700999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025030793,0.000056483335,0.000035896068,0.0002772412,0.00015847011,0.00020945715,0.00014975446,0.00009248332,0.000014460524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079626705,0.00013459423,0.13428731,0.0001507408,0.000071530056,0.0000016273882,0.5397716,0.0000041271132,0.00018120436,0.05427001,0.00569223,0.26535535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011909852,0.0006898552,0.71596915,0.000042515654,0.00004442993,0.0000016467228,0.07799398,0.000002906709,0.00011762722,0.0007028379,0.20288606,0.0003580267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012263195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0136134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5816818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018113894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023046974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99431425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2423738415","doi":"","title":"Hearing the Sexual Assault Complaints of Women with Mental Disabilities: Consent, Capacity, and Mistaken Belief","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Psychology; Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Voluntariness; Feminist legal theory; Criminology; Legislation; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Feminism","score_opus":0.0551548563594436,"score_gpt":0.30601896407232326,"score_spread":0.25086410771287965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2423738415","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710176,0.00016406289,0.000007013777,0.0014021038,0.00011182321,0.00041949924,0.000030192645,0.000049849692,0.026797844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980039,0.000017194923,0.00025899726,0.00026976477,0.00015008124,0.000018341543,0.0000024499245,0.000009949476,0.0012693141],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981155,0.00017867303,0.0002574161,0.00024880242,0.00062916445,0.0005704385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986375,0.00071652315,0.00010768613,0.00016091799,0.00012275175,0.00025463634],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014939936,0.00015949027,0.00026400472,0.000013005418,0.0013585807,0.00010322287,0.00022584372,0.00008312219,0.00014815561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043285583,0.00010230182,0.000030422823,0.00014180601,0.0027154791,0.0001949992,0.000109893095,0.00025032202,0.000015868318],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028283175,0.0002833333,0.39695862,0.0001690476,0.0004031306,0.000008636979,0.52141106,0.000009616917,0.0020557377,0.07432014,0.0029913606,0.0011064875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013053963,0.00029332837,0.16543768,0.00009322416,0.000030217265,0.0000078426165,0.69892365,0.0000050730655,0.00047166136,0.0007614744,0.13222107,0.0004493985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09072077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10920389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23152094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005488463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006701502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2427097214","doi":"","title":"The Carriage of Death: What Kind Does Canada Have?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carriage; Metaphor; Law; Poetry; Court decision; History; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Art; Archaeology; Literature; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028623207812052475,"score_gpt":0.2529400813373401,"score_spread":0.22431687352528762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2427097214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9182608,0.0018851139,0.0000018937284,0.058611512,0.0020937554,0.00084980176,0.000022332464,0.0000344514,0.018240321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98722833,0.0010275975,0.0000055512332,0.00008762841,0.00022430359,0.00024941342,1.888827e-7,0.0000040454,0.011172963],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879324,0.0001203614,0.0001379819,0.00012002506,0.00041460717,0.00041377218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990592,0.0005327296,0.00008242065,0.00011576918,0.00010341056,0.00010649038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047111447,0.00007187183,0.00011326931,0.0000059102254,0.000695498,0.00008154262,0.000271941,0.00003880611,0.000025129004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008390307,0.000027452434,0.00004438101,0.000057800622,0.0003262398,0.00024120274,0.00005770115,0.00004018085,0.0000019793824],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002591773,0.000023465793,0.13799465,0.000012899945,0.00018536922,0.000007727002,0.01890122,5.742192e-7,0.00009797194,0.012955182,0.016348809,0.8134462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013323942,0.0000016515132,0.50803554,0.000008949399,0.000010280946,6.304707e-8,0.012991215,9.112335e-8,0.000638664,0.0004123073,0.47768655,0.00008145092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80203855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9790077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81336474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035253956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010286051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5349279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2438599073","doi":"","title":"Federal and Provincial Responsibilities to Implement Physician-Assisted Suicide.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Supreme court; Parliament; Political science; Constitutional right; Politics","score_opus":0.06557578761139735,"score_gpt":0.3243805241960918,"score_spread":0.2588047365846945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2438599073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9552445,0.000099175195,0.000011434233,0.0314029,0.00024426062,0.0014537919,0.000030973086,0.0001162199,0.011396736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98789865,0.000021916443,0.00010446114,0.0006503727,0.00045959873,0.0011191056,6.547261e-7,0.000007988678,0.009737268],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983661,0.00019206424,0.00018038925,0.00027646357,0.00037017302,0.0006147822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992543,0.00026459646,0.00005480974,0.00010152491,0.00010919416,0.00021559169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000695331,0.0001204248,0.00017679596,0.000030796862,0.00082498015,0.00011888503,0.00013504764,0.000048230544,0.000028079978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010344528,0.00007446066,0.000052097268,0.00012816672,0.00022859448,0.0002178885,0.00013619977,0.000042834617,0.000020340369],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017416124,0.000058862275,0.03244853,0.000012787851,0.00006314398,0.0000042342585,0.021256423,5.863435e-8,0.0006449797,0.014975863,0.011626036,0.9187349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003419709,0.000022557839,0.8748585,0.000008651372,0.0000087415265,1.5982293e-7,0.005571909,6.3128255e-8,0.00034880664,0.0006801526,0.11799013,0.00016835266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006002917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023696985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9185666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041701208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050978757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W244194191","doi":"","title":"The Generative Structure of Aboriginal Rights","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Fundamental rights; Law; Treaty; Constitution; Political science; Sovereignty; International human rights law; Normative; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.007702695397735805,"score_gpt":0.31283345219625414,"score_spread":0.3051307567985183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W244194191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98204887,0.0059089907,0.0008975189,0.0030708325,0.00058826257,0.00017223034,0.000002645927,0.000020716,0.007289938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99345577,0.0029549052,0.00014328434,0.000029706673,0.0009785364,5.296619e-7,4.154066e-7,0.0000046074074,0.0024322283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972915,0.00015242043,0.00023363649,0.000099749144,0.0004999729,0.0017227044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999225,0.00017548128,0.00019895867,0.00006641421,0.00025846754,0.00007566726],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019966532,0.00010112721,0.00013065222,0.000023189143,0.0026885287,0.000059219263,0.00032510818,0.00007270857,0.000030905427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009270495,0.00005417745,0.00009132677,0.00019841718,0.0004307401,0.0001441655,0.0000136688,0.0010335234,0.0000047214535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033857967,0.000011721984,0.0014359489,7.237731e-7,0.00014198336,0.0000015066876,0.010572408,0.0000051347224,0.000961682,0.98032904,0.00022650042,0.0062795207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051476725,0.00016052905,0.006418003,0.000011717227,0.00005214069,0.000032576463,0.0527083,0.0000033037497,0.0023014634,0.6533616,0.28419888,0.00023671647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029492157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1641997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32696742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010869164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009855574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99860984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461040750","doi":"10.58188/1941-8043.1540","title":"CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.055419451246552016,"score_gpt":0.32962063004612413,"score_spread":0.2742011787995721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461040750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88678044,0.0017084223,0.000009218345,0.014105741,0.00020387398,0.00028028846,0.000003814897,0.000004596992,0.096903615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998621,0.00004624131,0.00021236931,0.0003120198,0.0002867512,0.0000030538522,5.5671293e-8,0.000003323964,0.00051520753],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985422,0.00043688726,0.00028388307,0.00007053045,0.00043409117,0.0002324047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989234,0.00038394076,0.00024813603,0.00003189345,0.00023534987,0.00017726202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002441413,0.00007704717,0.0002342952,0.000136984,0.000357194,0.00003519988,0.00030258033,0.000104140825,0.000013031277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096039864,0.000045890843,0.000048594764,0.00042117605,0.0003135645,0.00023936662,0.000022630444,0.00039431622,0.0000017613328],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011676513,0.000046652578,0.04770472,0.0000043191776,0.00017218309,0.000029414698,0.89125025,0.00005039475,0.000080077,0.021024307,0.03895263,0.0005683052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003945928,0.00073011685,0.34019855,0.00030949418,0.00014052143,0.00006837247,0.23660399,0.00010237912,0.00029351906,0.24668615,0.17042778,0.00049320544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08463512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054935995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6546463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005785448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046409472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96230894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461459292","doi":"","title":"Canadian Cases before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SAS-Space (University of London)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Reading (process); Sociology","score_opus":0.05242796781786223,"score_gpt":0.24171822565574208,"score_spread":0.18929025783787984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461459292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8896754,0.00033275402,0.0000032588125,0.0687098,0.00033302186,0.00035896193,0.000059489186,0.000023059218,0.040504258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930194,0.000040497252,0.000089882684,0.00012556156,0.00008517416,2.5827185e-7,0.0000012230479,0.0000041694802,0.006633828],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985041,0.00021128214,0.00007443916,0.00012794494,0.0007897274,0.0002924778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867815,0.000109678585,0.00015147412,0.00021500395,0.0006639151,0.00018178156],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006586496,0.00009433224,0.00019237638,0.000022139526,0.0014340783,0.000015543232,0.00069113023,0.000090178786,0.00009246789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055736525,0.00006619287,0.00012414796,0.00036954213,0.0014327774,0.00017635165,0.00016958629,0.00015718887,0.000023323271],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058497622,0.000058975354,0.14882296,0.000025768877,0.00018109124,0.000035382214,0.6626961,0.000038386926,0.00002900553,0.03324936,0.1525656,0.0022388438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004891466,0.00006117877,0.09836875,0.000030393552,0.00009747932,0.0000017112521,0.37585828,0.000012342622,0.000013736407,0.0006019938,0.5243406,0.00012435569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9356966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99492824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37177503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012428889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001410381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2464756804","doi":"","title":"Court dismisses constitutional challenge to ban on assisted suicide.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutional court; Political science; Criminal code; Assisted suicide; Criminology; Sociology; Criminal law; Constitution","score_opus":0.11702963401902573,"score_gpt":0.3338465262246891,"score_spread":0.21681689220566336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2464756804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22577201,0.00043689052,0.00005117294,0.14383501,0.001015576,0.0015706999,0.000023705541,0.00030027857,0.62699467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99190956,0.00020877457,0.00006858818,0.0008667327,0.0004883534,0.0007393111,0.0000045329375,0.0000051305515,0.0057090214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843687,0.00010133144,0.00015331883,0.0002460442,0.00052798766,0.00053442206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992252,0.00020241775,0.000047230966,0.000098974146,0.00012218842,0.00030399294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040939864,0.00012416652,0.0001673606,0.00003665076,0.00087205064,0.00007926105,0.0002034342,0.00007747484,0.00017847576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096864364,0.00009928873,0.00007086369,0.00023964285,0.0005966482,0.00013156909,0.00004746455,0.00010588878,0.00017442489],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016196404,0.00064122764,0.037153028,0.000016824595,0.00021938028,0.00009113113,0.012223161,0.00004290766,0.000022352551,0.6130969,0.064126275,0.27220485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015493229,0.000010939987,0.46937263,0.0000073359797,0.000008705896,7.5565976e-7,0.0018156809,6.5814805e-7,0.000007654285,0.0001705447,0.5283227,0.0001274678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020314257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034936664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76613754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048911443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004152071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6707196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468615915","doi":"10.1017/s0963180116000025","title":"Physician-Assisted Death in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Supreme court; Law; Declaration; Assisted suicide; Criminal code; Right to die; Political science; Living Wills; Government (linguistics); Medicine; Criminal law; Health care","score_opus":0.07460871032314151,"score_gpt":0.35983236702849103,"score_spread":0.28522365670534955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2468615915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87183714,0.0007168036,0.000036307967,0.1231614,0.00070022163,0.0003916745,0.00008130171,0.00004632937,0.0030288142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980237,0.00020477464,0.00009263219,0.0009545582,0.0001848797,0.00002200716,0.0000029055097,0.000012296243,0.00050224975],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970928,0.0007452521,0.00045291698,0.00028901207,0.00082189485,0.0005981467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997774,0.0011428187,0.00021029102,0.00020646845,0.00046488136,0.00020155194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009087174,0.00016115075,0.00037021702,0.00004127876,0.00045634338,0.000015055631,0.0002918519,0.00020837248,0.000008937151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003851213,0.00011763077,0.00007312231,0.00027344582,0.00031668332,0.00017211163,0.000018058203,0.00048699128,0.000012081975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101409736,0.00015645898,0.14852835,0.0006649867,0.0000974727,0.00009496593,0.14854726,0.0000011305584,0.0009419714,0.21239786,0.009668572,0.47879955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011240742,0.00047094142,0.8613025,0.00087837374,0.000018901059,0.0000020394882,0.096244074,0.000005640124,0.00024567996,0.00077717786,0.038287584,0.00064300996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71277416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021325836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042101583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.746864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2473269292","doi":"","title":"Support for Adult Children in Canada: When Does Childhood End?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Legislation; Child support; Political science; Social support; Income Support; Psychology; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.005789281456243354,"score_gpt":0.2382224155201625,"score_spread":0.23243313406391913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2473269292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93397635,0.0009827871,0.00023460576,0.06072886,0.0006302548,0.00078149466,0.00005045623,0.00004412585,0.002571062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99127996,0.00348318,0.00007501908,0.0004093198,0.0007238516,0.000027426307,0.0000024748078,0.000015144822,0.003983631],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996199,0.00012238999,0.00030804184,0.00022287345,0.00047393105,0.0026737566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924743,0.00015004931,0.00015852902,0.000084972206,0.00021871726,0.00014031315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011614044,0.00015948855,0.00023592879,0.000041681214,0.0007043461,0.00004210369,0.000403299,0.000073005795,0.0001778619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066708704,0.00008605497,0.00011103414,0.000097683966,0.000112788264,0.00027937934,0.000036192585,0.0005619487,0.000010878405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009759242,0.0001661803,0.48942462,0.000006725678,0.0007025002,0.0000073494734,0.019391838,0.0000028745387,0.00015071168,0.27864638,0.008241213,0.20316201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055496027,0.00040086117,0.58010083,0.00011900636,0.00010943825,0.00007235642,0.055496827,0.0000018207821,0.00026428417,0.3115806,0.045212585,0.0010917567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8682549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20207027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007452326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010846115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477165663","doi":"10.29173/alr377","title":"Forging Alberta's Constitutional Framework, Richard Connors &amp; John M. Law, eds.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.06634414393547833,"score_gpt":0.3534451702740703,"score_spread":0.28710102633859197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477165663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007615817,0.14216594,0.00007962778,0.038774,0.00123366,0.0012389201,0.000011078739,0.00009441798,0.81564075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7047124,0.15712245,0.0072628013,0.07323721,0.0029757738,0.0006801635,0.00018670496,0.00009313624,0.05372935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721026,0.00040966622,0.00052139,0.00044379698,0.0007501184,0.00066478236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99710727,0.001486976,0.00023311526,0.00033130654,0.00038542243,0.00045593156],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009722583,0.00030907034,0.00068042637,0.00001605227,0.0011827648,0.00013697788,0.00048615912,0.00020041838,0.0009799115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004057251,0.00024305034,0.0002657375,0.00039241632,0.0024723262,0.00049468543,0.00017022,0.00034111034,0.0024616884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003512483,0.000033210974,0.00038056925,0.00018057712,0.000077693476,0.000002051374,0.0028340705,0.0000014034424,8.8095373e-7,0.95707184,0.03858283,0.0008313457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019556769,0.000012324286,0.000022695212,0.0015426283,0.00012544631,0.000005171596,0.00023716902,0.0000010282553,0.000002684518,0.004452119,0.9930449,0.00035823928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20571253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20735835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9544621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029151968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020372712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2478908027","doi":"10.1007/978-94-017-9885-3_14","title":"Later Scholastic Philosophy of Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholasticism; Nominalism; Trope (literature); Philosophy; Allegiance; Scholarship; Historiography; Middle Ages; Aristotelianism; Of Reformation; Period (music); Classics; Fifteenth; Quarter (Canadian coin); Theology; Literature; History; Art; Law; Epistemology; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.10747924469052322,"score_gpt":0.32996179424102345,"score_spread":0.22248254955050023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2478908027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000036146175,0.0008473504,0.0000015353457,0.0017628351,0.00036796607,0.00025094693,0.00002188687,0.000083220526,0.9966281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.091873445,0.00016066899,0.0002011899,0.00020330919,0.0007129689,0.000004529697,0.0000074344757,0.000023122711,0.9068133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985253,0.000031189295,0.00026892705,0.00023787697,0.0007099997,0.00022667099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989977,0.000094819436,0.00016781769,0.00015096876,0.00044599723,0.00014272574],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000281458,0.00021783603,0.0004068592,0.000030158926,0.00030665653,0.000038370537,0.00027818975,0.00035335048,0.002755783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000102662874,0.00015821475,0.00016270543,0.000019422525,0.0010102945,0.00015695646,0.00013086683,0.0002667703,0.0008196219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004793885,0.000006661302,0.0000094850975,0.000018165698,0.00007534383,0.0000025157763,0.0025850532,5.5249916e-7,0.0000030499293,0.98972887,0.0073596523,0.0002058804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011146902,0.000025831912,0.000012916084,0.000071876726,0.000046735582,1.3247315e-7,0.00012957046,2.3922865e-7,0.000005113123,0.16182476,0.83756906,0.00020227442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002545285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021386012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83020943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001926495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000684337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2479455347","doi":"10.1163/ej.9789004172326.i-395.109","title":"Chapter Ten. Religious Confession Privilege In Canada And New Zealand","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confession (law); Privilege (computing); History; Genealogy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0361981523712043,"score_gpt":0.25667099479801003,"score_spread":0.22047284242680573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2479455347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034506132,0.0014052665,8.136546e-7,0.0030227662,0.0004374778,0.00048050098,0.000012663557,0.000046106255,0.99114376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14846545,0.006599402,0.00006412386,0.00039847643,0.00026051686,0.0000048019883,0.0000049815512,0.000023500234,0.84417874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853337,0.000022213138,0.00029030206,0.00036905764,0.0004256134,0.00035942133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929243,0.000086753214,0.00015103455,0.00013086532,0.00007577257,0.0002631479],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001404091,0.0002829691,0.00041889123,0.000040426756,0.00024424485,0.00003488019,0.00018465753,0.00027406114,0.0014178448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004505867,0.00020503567,0.000050538496,0.000017855022,0.00022139256,0.00008700312,0.00013828021,0.00031201143,0.00004308995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051887757,0.000014942629,0.03527361,0.00005151277,0.00016774541,0.0001949654,0.051648173,3.3351222e-7,0.000008851593,0.6421739,0.2283167,0.04209736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026441496,0.000017907601,0.0076882374,0.00015687446,0.000022563903,0.0000012705358,0.00073039916,3.9150964e-7,0.0000030080826,0.0100231785,0.9806964,0.00039539876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9979284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75237966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055776304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069590274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2480329367","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280919.003.0013","title":"13 Unmarried Couples: The Legal Consequences of the Ending of the Relationship","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; History; Political science; Sociology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.0772799621729947,"score_gpt":0.3146808453764198,"score_spread":0.23740088320342512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2480329367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004409578,0.0011558285,0.0000020782343,0.016734315,0.0005620802,0.00078669295,0.000039379403,0.00003039802,0.9762797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62052286,0.00022577921,0.000024796196,0.00014672127,0.00019352738,0.000007653448,7.852077e-7,0.000008383166,0.37886947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979577,0.00020659924,0.00047025044,0.00020348089,0.00093235343,0.00022960585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970719,0.001660245,0.0006607197,0.0003447582,0.0002254453,0.000036918555],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008166217,0.00021540113,0.00032357342,0.000019471756,0.0018112218,0.000052203795,0.0010176246,0.00026601317,0.0008080616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011284709,0.00008492584,0.0003751789,0.00011441951,0.005333682,0.000111531976,0.00022289151,0.00048403017,0.000011698672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003250389,0.00000426631,0.0040906807,0.000011833842,0.00007907049,1.5161397e-7,0.009975136,0.000015279524,0.000037508282,0.9835949,0.0020050104,0.0001829102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023401271,0.000021306745,0.025450576,0.000499167,0.00030317236,0.0000019145755,0.025860708,0.0000068490885,0.00032752304,0.030580988,0.9163007,0.0004130759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010229709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026449814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9530139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002031937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030968775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482862444","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198268956.003.0013","title":"Constitutional Continuity and Constitutional Independence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Constitution; Sovereignty; Relation (database); Political science; Constitutional law; Separation of powers; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Politics; Statistics","score_opus":0.033378225285023724,"score_gpt":0.2527967149183283,"score_spread":0.21941848963330457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2482862444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008778109,0.00029642315,0.00028452676,0.0002189829,0.00022396457,0.0004298565,0.0002728748,0.000115369134,0.99807024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04055055,0.0012356588,0.00034185653,0.00008407486,0.00033597744,0.0000010791737,0.000019431442,0.000005253904,0.95742613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984117,0.00005789909,0.00016208085,0.00041500924,0.00064327096,0.00031002538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989999,0.00015214171,0.00019177442,0.00012660578,0.00031665005,0.00021292026],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021593084,0.00027163903,0.00033460977,0.00004212372,0.0015939934,0.000080552585,0.00032501158,0.0005192494,0.00019454237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055282268,0.00029165568,0.00012991141,0.000007740773,0.02069138,0.00021726228,0.00033171137,0.00049342803,0.0000040907585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002898284,0.000006700311,0.000080993625,0.000012162851,0.00011017444,0.00004265723,0.0010505173,0.0000021960384,0.0000016553621,0.99472225,0.0009898726,0.0029518143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042284874,0.000011421585,0.00007605673,0.00008183068,0.00010473305,0.000005807387,0.0003644463,0.0000020067591,0.0000032248802,0.0010973983,0.9974812,0.00034898685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005081752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079763104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9964914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004965967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037827538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2485948902","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195366815.001.0001","title":"Common Law Marriage","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Common law; Law; Comparative law; Political science; Public law; Marriage law; Civil law (Civil law); Doctrine; Family law; Legal history; Legislature; Municipal law; Sociology","score_opus":0.043493508917421174,"score_gpt":0.3140786401829414,"score_spread":0.27058513126552025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2485948902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000037487414,0.0008842819,0.0000010694685,0.001822497,0.0005484045,0.0003874485,0.000017016662,0.0002627567,0.99603903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018652723,0.0016384035,0.00015160635,0.0009846243,0.0012423969,0.000016594204,0.000030488813,0.000022300484,0.9940483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836326,0.000113621274,0.00022526208,0.00027631584,0.0006377233,0.00038381308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999251,0.00020777901,0.00011840054,0.00017607393,0.0001054226,0.00014130086],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019510576,0.00023965415,0.00042206774,0.000018541436,0.0016335192,0.00007341013,0.00039593485,0.00045640604,0.0016857958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043217347,0.00018643415,0.00020644417,0.00004904451,0.0011776227,0.00012158603,0.00013970578,0.0003612859,0.0013391048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013573009,0.000007652342,0.00001797846,0.000007638658,0.000038234295,0.000015161932,0.0055419384,8.8380226e-8,3.0954453e-7,0.504355,0.48953387,0.00048075485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084459905,0.000011012685,0.00006274223,0.000028808752,0.000021954771,5.704845e-7,0.0006907636,1.9909464e-7,0.000001967299,0.0075808386,0.99123704,0.0002796655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024193907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06316327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50170314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006992164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017476999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2487090102","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567751.003.0005","title":"Resisting Temptations to ‘Justice’","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Discretion; Unjust enrichment; Politics; Subject (documents); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Restitution","score_opus":0.07950535248798295,"score_gpt":0.3524223187860604,"score_spread":0.27291696629807743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2487090102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001483921,0.00023174586,0.00003818275,0.0125466185,0.00029053242,0.00042047104,0.0000106741845,0.00021551867,0.98623145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022920833,0.00019043282,0.0038922788,0.0011021411,0.0010438303,0.000010162913,0.0000069496177,0.000016527445,0.9914456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860746,0.000026711143,0.00024688937,0.00030134557,0.00051107426,0.0003065507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990668,0.0002397621,0.00010548558,0.00013293649,0.00026849617,0.00018650273],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002568755,0.00020144621,0.0002581142,0.00005541562,0.0021250353,0.00010938282,0.00024236953,0.00023428995,0.0014053743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006779661,0.00017016385,0.000119839795,0.000052970707,0.0001570652,0.00008112475,0.00006460006,0.00021052868,0.0012547647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002470781,0.000005279075,0.0000047975936,0.000012503969,0.000035605568,0.0000053946974,0.01036444,0.00000516596,0.00000491478,0.89434123,0.07507282,0.020145366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039324834,0.000017852588,0.0002477814,0.00007912046,0.000100956844,1.1265206e-7,0.0028587382,6.6880125e-7,0.0000010509692,0.00858494,0.9877944,0.00027507803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026350592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012833192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9127216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003339732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000081633865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2488724390","doi":"","title":"Wandering Without a Torch: Federalism as a Guiding Light","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Cooperative federalism; Dual federalism; Doctrine; Individualism; Politics; Law; New Federalism; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Constitutional law; Charter; Sociology","score_opus":0.03417181496405478,"score_gpt":0.31277231725637644,"score_spread":0.27860050229232164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2488724390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85411084,0.0054311207,0.0034773324,0.09155619,0.0009997524,0.0003544135,0.0000010747079,0.00023378425,0.043835472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97468805,0.0061450973,0.00013239788,0.00015431378,0.0013032083,0.000008975553,1.1060678e-7,0.000018116645,0.017549755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961168,0.0002143334,0.0002551417,0.00021811273,0.00056905486,0.0026265194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930465,0.00011663577,0.00015537482,0.000094075025,0.00015400464,0.00017523424],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020133087,0.0001681576,0.00021779191,0.00004606178,0.0022596684,0.00019596679,0.00035540055,0.00010240567,0.00014433548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00080726034,0.00010029158,0.00015128448,0.00014365868,0.00014333472,0.00048012144,0.00006834378,0.000504843,0.00014105628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005824271,0.000042359345,0.0060197255,0.0000045502056,0.00037867916,0.000012200582,0.033633962,8.706396e-7,0.011891035,0.906804,0.00085396407,0.040300366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017868589,0.00034320756,0.001132153,0.00030023107,0.000089855035,0.00021826872,0.07762813,0.000002837531,0.0014867939,0.51934475,0.39681587,0.00085105584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002683157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010516579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3959619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002874762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011693644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99903923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2490928964","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199543670.003.0009","title":"Law and Religion","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Morality; Law; Public morality; Diversity (politics); Morality and religion; Rest (music); Political science; Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033897120400284066,"score_gpt":0.2376156440210364,"score_spread":0.20371852362075235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2490928964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000107313936,0.00042094412,0.0000029225805,0.00016510466,0.00012744313,0.0003068673,0.000026878843,0.0001325416,0.99871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002116153,0.013593311,0.000114147755,0.00013514995,0.00016216662,4.11383e-7,0.0000057499333,0.000015909804,0.983857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989806,0.00004193151,0.00009856217,0.00031125385,0.00031992208,0.00024773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993992,0.0000715624,0.00012514915,0.00014349217,0.00011362673,0.00014697922],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007056903,0.00021431857,0.00027084738,0.000033036376,0.0014859983,0.00004088602,0.00024868382,0.00037769138,0.000017213724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010752953,0.0002217769,0.00011746752,0.0000048322477,0.0012207708,0.00010719376,0.00026473432,0.0002698601,0.0000018612304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019230045,0.0000025840957,0.0000031704683,0.000013487946,0.000061860184,0.000057668232,0.005747619,1.9905548e-7,0.0000010268142,0.9848093,0.008301897,0.0009820026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019792319,0.000019663692,0.000009696045,0.000053477135,0.00007054042,0.0000015813264,0.00033841902,5.809883e-7,0.000004142299,0.000590032,0.9984442,0.00026973095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007588205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026785294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99014235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023831723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004272112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493931398","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004331","title":"Gender, Multiculturalism and Dialogue: The Case of Jewish Divorce","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Judaism; Negotiation; Law; Sociology; Political science; Power (physics); Family law; Civil law (Civil law); Ethnic group; Gender studies; Public law","score_opus":0.05870838004157729,"score_gpt":0.305949515897247,"score_spread":0.2472411358556697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493931398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.982981,0.008595162,0.0000068688246,0.003818697,0.00047633436,0.0001781799,0.000020158428,0.000006904985,0.003916691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979088,0.00092420756,0.00026516512,0.00033765522,0.00032421225,0.0000023692064,3.5908533e-7,0.0000067047813,0.00023056418],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985709,0.00024123449,0.0003777983,0.0001302944,0.0002892296,0.00039051057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981762,0.00030701864,0.00030512307,0.00012201051,0.00050491176,0.00058470765],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058889226,0.00013367402,0.00026906555,0.000035972032,0.0020361645,0.0000742138,0.00039980115,0.00009406878,0.00004808359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000611278,0.00008405451,0.000115886694,0.00018670382,0.0025152992,0.00038210105,0.00003251808,0.00028452434,0.000004130711],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024638846,0.0000500035,0.026041374,0.000068305155,0.00031759258,0.013187165,0.8189502,0.00006816631,0.000510768,0.120043516,0.016088268,0.004650005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027187183,0.00044694124,0.19293241,0.0005063308,0.00056685717,0.019034052,0.1291214,0.000055937933,0.0011655834,0.006109766,0.6456688,0.0016731849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33109936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55890113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6898288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017951913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046493812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493935367","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198252481.003.0009","title":"Living Together Less Contentiously—The Jurisprudence of Reconciliation in the 1990s","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; State (computer science); Appearance of impropriety; Theme (computing); Political science; Law; Settlement (finance); Closure (psychology); Sociology","score_opus":0.06851273167562791,"score_gpt":0.31160836190576596,"score_spread":0.24309563023013805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493935367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005196228,0.0012789621,0.000019025889,0.006338571,0.00032566246,0.00086851424,0.000007177867,0.00003727536,0.9859286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6180028,0.0011267477,0.00006079743,0.00048273342,0.0002509151,0.000028775548,0.0000017736139,0.000013327634,0.38003215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983507,0.00016091965,0.00036688228,0.0002230093,0.0006738246,0.00022467293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985635,0.00071761064,0.0003010416,0.0001940813,0.00019851596,0.000025196388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014682907,0.00018155994,0.00028307005,0.000028670485,0.00048401582,0.00006656527,0.00057305174,0.000245872,0.00065478386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030461195,0.00009501089,0.00016852282,0.000061704,0.00066238287,0.000121481185,0.00007752817,0.0003474751,0.00005100391],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004745181,0.000023663804,0.0012634903,0.000031051244,0.000068306974,0.0000029812288,0.14229964,0.000011728621,0.000011553097,0.84828484,0.0014633047,0.0065347017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007555327,0.00014430236,0.031861603,0.0024100335,0.00027254215,0.0000025515606,0.21330447,0.000013640484,0.000023467073,0.08090354,0.6689086,0.0013997507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03997549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13124686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7673813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034235328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011115043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9664174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2497269033","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199216451.003.0022","title":"18 From Vatican II to Mississauga—Lessons in Receptive Ecumenical Learning from the Anglican—Roman Catholic Bilateral Dialogue Process","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecumenism; Christian ministry; Faith; Gospel; Collegiality; Aesthetics; Sociology; Theology; Political science; Psychology; Art; Pedagogy; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07566102278543274,"score_gpt":0.33500815786795735,"score_spread":0.2593471350825246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2497269033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34470987,0.0005052431,0.000005148369,0.032938242,0.00040650304,0.0017168978,0.00025727757,0.00031482975,0.619146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76923275,0.00096558203,0.0004913718,0.0012673734,0.0016173922,0.00016083961,0.00023698364,0.000084484964,0.22594321],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963765,0.00032113897,0.0006290213,0.0009795383,0.0009462544,0.00074751076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776137,0.0010194109,0.0002937851,0.0003310481,0.0002341764,0.00036022198],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003739293,0.00059282006,0.0009050325,0.00007770923,0.002188291,0.00016246841,0.0009435281,0.00064334035,0.0037250111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089150324,0.00039767116,0.00026133785,0.00020465067,0.0010321764,0.00019148354,0.0004638962,0.001266704,0.00025460706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011180069,0.000156749,0.004756698,0.0000105772,0.00046349058,0.00012520334,0.94886523,0.0000582987,0.00009283011,0.009165904,0.028410839,0.007782403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060297415,0.00019212667,0.021655707,0.00038201088,0.0001537696,0.0000013170281,0.01739324,0.0000155946,0.00003971321,0.0048451824,0.953327,0.0013913647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13767241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13532777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93147194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000692528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025759896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2500609355","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139060516.021","title":"Constitution of Upper Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Content (measure theory); Computer science; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03565767890668799,"score_gpt":0.2193787098942711,"score_spread":0.18372103098758313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2500609355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023449685,0.00019560328,0.00001299954,0.0000567553,0.00039727474,0.00032350156,0.00022502015,0.000045548375,0.9985088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02997464,0.00028077918,0.00003055639,0.000031470932,0.00010236021,3.3223697e-7,0.000011551831,0.000008284111,0.96956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989288,0.000050328596,0.00014839877,0.00024905833,0.0003851592,0.000238274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990674,0.000061927865,0.00023364401,0.00017726014,0.0003204879,0.00013922581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009069352,0.00020086838,0.00032950737,0.00003948663,0.0005379492,0.0000112330235,0.0003583401,0.00026122935,0.000029521856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033015986,0.00021359784,0.00013454694,0.0000066288053,0.0012321309,0.000069729445,0.00017321648,0.00022300809,0.00000472759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017431523,0.0000030161561,0.000020177007,0.000027367647,0.00011042404,0.000034669923,0.0007309811,2.2322251e-7,0.0000048154147,0.9555847,0.043156225,0.00030997177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015805839,0.000009413099,0.000103016886,0.000083424056,0.00013013935,5.332529e-7,0.0005915799,2.9878365e-7,0.000079882026,0.000009917203,0.99859273,0.00024101553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8943683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21648565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9555748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076190766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084337627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87102675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2502354050","doi":"10.5040/9781501356216.ch-001","title":"‘Find love in Canada’: Distributed selves, abstraction, and the problem of privacy and autonomy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Bloomsbury Academic eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Abstraction; Internet privacy; Computer security; Computer science; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.022621505921255013,"score_gpt":0.25291205676158257,"score_spread":0.23029055084032757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2502354050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032964323,0.020909682,0.000008987545,0.037232146,0.00029283547,0.004798173,0.0005370616,0.00009990252,0.9031569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67714775,0.010678586,0.00038661176,0.0012195014,0.0009769584,0.00008458007,0.00005859131,0.000094907264,0.30935255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980589,0.00009933114,0.0006400877,0.00041059434,0.000472511,0.00031853656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862534,0.00048589773,0.00051387574,0.00011815644,0.00009074051,0.00016597583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004976491,0.00031509536,0.0006234325,0.000032486336,0.00027442296,0.000029618488,0.0003267622,0.0004729403,0.000042645628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012653007,0.00023162777,0.0000672552,0.000029421946,0.0012936707,0.00008002504,0.00024082838,0.0013447534,0.000004280106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033755982,0.000018598894,0.008703387,0.0007634206,0.0010550425,0.000064312706,0.13056785,0.0000139632375,0.00018457232,0.79681754,0.018316107,0.043157622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009798479,0.0000134288985,0.0050205267,0.00025813113,0.00014714216,0.0000038796434,0.0025031723,0.0000075545368,0.000028961225,0.016410165,0.97425866,0.0003685353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52814996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38678554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9559426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066560024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015522597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94455063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503800980","doi":"10.2307/4135186","title":"The Marriage of Roman Soldiers (13 B.C.-A.D. 235): Law and Family in the Imperial Army","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Phoenix","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Ancient history; Political science; History","score_opus":0.0187216192719451,"score_gpt":0.2857187943391229,"score_spread":0.2669971750671778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503800980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95587236,0.00093383435,0.0000013427893,0.0047700093,0.00030712064,0.000331536,0.000005702562,0.000018743342,0.03775933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99866825,0.00052973104,0.000044286167,0.0004430594,0.00019809332,0.000027010708,7.386048e-7,0.0000048521833,0.00008394621],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988859,0.00018130855,0.00017585368,0.00013940493,0.00031974062,0.00029775116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994786,0.00025048162,0.00006890287,0.00011839464,0.000040338033,0.000043326567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007316014,0.000095972166,0.00014067041,0.000009538564,0.0010172568,0.000089338064,0.00030792636,0.000056171237,0.000010156403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020923752,0.00005022346,0.000057127094,0.00015108933,0.0009982664,0.000117216645,0.000068931186,0.00013176684,0.0000059151675],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100531,0.00010835605,0.0027861374,0.000018891942,0.000084184154,0.000014101825,0.6613407,0.000030765048,0.006431057,0.32119444,0.0036127525,0.0042780805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032980633,0.00021684813,0.14437497,0.00006985963,0.000076551325,0.000002717987,0.2589118,0.000007850345,0.0014857663,0.043331467,0.5476576,0.00056648237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060493734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05969677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5440449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008979331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034949313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9574613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504227454","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4516","title":"WHEN DISCIPLINES COLLIDE: POLYGAMY AND THE SOCIAL SCIENCES ON TRIAL","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Adjudication; Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1590766274158785,"score_gpt":0.42674200413142765,"score_spread":0.26766537671554913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504227454","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8311634,0.00031754872,0.000016307404,0.06782778,0.0011239414,0.0015672065,0.000015086373,0.00006550742,0.09790324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99471414,0.000030475105,0.00025805933,0.0008964526,0.0018650154,0.00005978164,5.175563e-7,0.000008764705,0.0021668205],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979996,0.0002943024,0.0002569379,0.00026564582,0.0008594304,0.0003240552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987405,0.0006623638,0.0001628398,0.00010051731,0.0002044067,0.00012936068],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016484595,0.00013698071,0.0002984895,0.000056388144,0.0014367454,0.00035367665,0.0007352883,0.000080206504,0.00004027531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002178186,0.00008234486,0.00006867092,0.0003493925,0.0020344085,0.0003854941,0.00034905627,0.00012296892,0.00002741458],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.026128208,0.00041544,0.0048879194,0.00013515088,0.0002506386,0.0000072203416,0.5889828,0.00024863274,0.00009037329,0.22085948,0.15108256,0.0069115525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.11058612,0.0023963877,0.072895125,0.00043085476,0.0019358068,0.0000021492258,0.47116718,0.00029925333,0.0006500311,0.025205389,0.31214055,0.0022911457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004221449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00097353465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1956541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008105859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017775132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504625780","doi":"10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31254-5","title":"Finding a balance: Canada's law on medical assistance in dying","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Lancet","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; CancerCare Manitoba; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Law; House of Commons; Legislation; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Political science; Charter; Criminal code; Government (linguistics); Medicine; Criminal law; History; Politics","score_opus":0.04654313457790404,"score_gpt":0.32630928757785604,"score_spread":0.279766152999952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504625780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57593584,0.00030126673,0.000011242704,0.2823856,0.00059302873,0.00020944505,0.000015974703,0.000059420192,0.14048822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99512106,0.00015275921,0.000022897488,0.002827727,0.0007790652,0.000017376095,3.05291e-7,0.0000041439903,0.0010746471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985107,0.00018587493,0.00011694158,0.00013855273,0.00064343883,0.0004044618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991439,0.000581929,0.000046964153,0.0001369729,0.00002301801,0.00006724525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008308211,0.00007398279,0.00019844648,0.000006093255,0.0005111059,0.00003286743,0.0004243231,0.00005230541,0.00018076558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082259363,0.000035080084,0.000019807205,0.00012395963,0.000275833,0.00005937048,0.000046958998,0.00015227684,0.000024158217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012876299,0.000049184473,0.24852982,0.000028640598,0.00006167317,0.0001025098,0.026532464,0.000008386445,0.0004644283,0.5641853,0.14589222,0.014016576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011500823,0.00001365756,0.13875236,0.00044109699,0.000005022207,6.1355246e-7,0.0030448828,0.000021205833,0.0001278984,0.00146984,0.8547309,0.00024244178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6076951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97421074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7088387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005270627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015664432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3949173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504732619","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579815.003.0010","title":"Concluding Comparatively: Discovery in the English Colonies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aotearoa; Doctrine; Indigenous; Scientific discovery; History; Data science; Genealogy; Geography; Political science; Computer science; Law; Psychology; Biology; Ecology; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.05833195601123116,"score_gpt":0.2771313415853785,"score_spread":0.21879938557414735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504732619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004214487,0.00010169924,0.000005657418,0.00026896366,0.000412445,0.00069719064,0.000093426584,0.000078208555,0.9941279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08247938,0.00052747363,0.000070004724,0.000086127475,0.0003752616,0.0000029507128,0.0000134492875,0.000015136734,0.91643023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848956,0.0001743871,0.00016419786,0.0003321673,0.0004833903,0.0003563103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988326,0.0004811021,0.00022263966,0.00020831195,0.00018694093,0.00006843802],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035012563,0.00028080167,0.00040183452,0.000060260714,0.0014865802,0.00020567032,0.0008494664,0.00042279193,0.000031726944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008248073,0.00022738954,0.00017639255,0.000016569933,0.0015451319,0.00030070168,0.0003310264,0.0009089198,0.0000011384654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035194098,0.000008688235,0.00007139974,0.000013127518,0.00006784904,0.000037732927,0.08900682,0.000001295316,0.0000055694727,0.9092217,0.0013400702,0.0001905252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029293055,0.000020797666,0.0001462421,0.00006863099,0.00006954213,2.7328812e-7,0.01714458,8.9405995e-7,0.00001737959,0.00057725754,0.9813678,0.0002936462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028717893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0140933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98002774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033354558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011242894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2506582110","doi":"10.29173/alr11","title":"The Last Case [Reprint — (1978) 16:1 Alta. L. Rev. 1]","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Division (mathematics); Sociology; History; Art; Mathematics; Visual arts","score_opus":0.03485739077736608,"score_gpt":0.3327982125207901,"score_spread":0.297940821743424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2506582110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051391246,0.10214944,0.000010669045,0.07876511,0.0007915163,0.0015636517,0.000002114053,0.000099320125,0.81147903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81264514,0.16017468,0.00013297869,0.010268657,0.00073742686,0.0002365844,0.00000400598,0.00002216667,0.015778339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784154,0.0006947328,0.00036831814,0.0003038364,0.00033760042,0.00045395992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975473,0.0015410295,0.00017038522,0.00042576104,0.00015110747,0.00016439837],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001698404,0.00017627723,0.0003615899,0.0000043663204,0.0024694034,0.00012317808,0.0004084895,0.00006649732,0.0003110744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002902963,0.00010053487,0.00019806856,0.00021658714,0.0005877193,0.00014636233,0.00016556833,0.00018402011,0.0011388173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001578232,0.000024095236,0.00036160307,0.0003202397,0.00005751424,0.0000136908375,0.0023993938,3.1925504e-7,0.0000019033287,0.91172487,0.030295542,0.05479925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006992861,0.000011878092,0.00010605163,0.0005268294,0.00006221577,0.00002214269,0.00034628037,0.000001561992,0.000004484325,0.00048749088,0.9981997,0.00016146095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13588968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4217368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96790415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014512459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027748132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507876249","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.2.314","title":"Indian Act Sex Discrimination: Enough Inquiry Already, Just Fix It","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sex discrimination; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.065825242173339,"score_gpt":0.3111458523708563,"score_spread":0.24532061019751727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507876249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7795977,0.0007149027,0.000009414912,0.19027033,0.0007966105,0.00022497479,0.00002732979,0.000010551888,0.028348187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857321,0.0004904873,0.000027721731,0.0020513078,0.00092605967,0.000010499683,0.0000010734396,0.000011965325,0.010748796],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983885,0.00030548073,0.00031984152,0.00014507046,0.00022815245,0.0006129238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982868,0.00040080096,0.00025213635,0.00012501777,0.00017120808,0.00076407066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016545668,0.00014845876,0.00034392357,0.00007351441,0.001040603,0.00020908633,0.0004124748,0.000101375415,0.00033129146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000559203,0.000084734114,0.00011055692,0.00014845854,0.001371673,0.0005019789,0.000034411103,0.00022001953,0.000022599928],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032455275,0.000012507332,0.002215425,0.000022194046,0.00014639019,0.0001042102,0.7778477,0.0000012688299,0.000008413499,0.20292833,0.0057386425,0.010942472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025081087,0.00015002167,0.0137646785,0.00030429466,0.000073561656,0.00010975127,0.31907943,0.0000012143347,0.000031384887,0.033429436,0.63012964,0.00041848063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027786966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30958873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62439096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009789132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046678513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9786871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508186192","doi":"10.7202/1119729ar","title":"What Section 15 has Achieved","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"World Federation of Science Journalists","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Humanities; Politics; Scrutiny; Nomination; Charter; Ethnology; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.21246143555800287,"score_gpt":0.4305056061130309,"score_spread":0.21804417055502803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508186192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23687975,0.12761192,0.0007390247,0.16971399,0.104482874,0.0038211753,0.00007359464,0.0020990984,0.35457858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98382175,0.005433099,0.00057831564,0.001701136,0.006201841,0.000094152645,0.0000120148425,0.00002688404,0.0021308125],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582356,0.00083146116,0.00050042314,0.0006214589,0.0011585654,0.0010645466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997776,0.0006184421,0.00009701243,0.0001374012,0.0010570994,0.00031409788],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011503164,0.0003822928,0.00064224453,0.000043948912,0.0033532078,0.0005149271,0.00038775767,0.00044303914,0.000044178705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071011316,0.00031372654,0.0001879531,0.0007231901,0.0026947882,0.0012200847,0.00032580073,0.000696732,0.0001166347],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007484531,0.00024814715,0.0017348307,0.0002345984,0.0002769453,0.000114102004,0.7060468,0.0000093113695,0.00007800878,0.08089592,0.20856424,0.0017222171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006283677,0.000053285294,0.0035767776,0.00007075205,0.00032876653,0.000004823183,0.62335867,0.0000058872733,0.00001008823,0.0034214219,0.3680971,0.00044405693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019645793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006083607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.746942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010208281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012760342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510209270","doi":"","title":"Noting the Obvious: A Reflection on the Supreme Court of Canada’s Application of Judicial Notice under Sections 7 and 15 of the “Charter”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Reflection (computer programming); Computer science","score_opus":0.029353216067322264,"score_gpt":0.2720005618493013,"score_spread":0.24264734578197905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510209270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88085526,0.00016528959,0.0074529336,0.08915531,0.00050450943,0.0010794781,0.00011952339,0.000023536382,0.020644143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993054,0.0000326493,0.0000413218,0.00015637788,0.00015998902,0.000031445947,0.0000010560268,0.0000025285167,0.0002691944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990247,0.000143257,0.0002304028,0.00010958831,0.0003774706,0.0001145973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981196,0.000971865,0.0002737111,0.00011147102,0.00050091796,0.000022446293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006454012,0.00005895758,0.00010228178,0.000022127926,0.0009999636,0.0000085639695,0.00016072074,0.000057067824,0.00001439349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001500915,0.000031703024,0.000048928185,0.00024254648,0.0008901143,0.00007118606,0.000026662088,0.00009121208,7.5543153e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010783992,0.00003300383,0.004380999,0.000016353331,0.000050415612,5.397821e-8,0.0039639557,0.00073089224,0.0041135564,0.9857401,0.00054664916,0.00041320582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00226922,0.00012919804,0.7788185,0.0011335223,0.00046746706,0.000032419568,0.052914575,0.0039308243,0.015970357,0.10740785,0.03619898,0.00072707445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08711749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4155096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87833226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049589976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000618286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91896147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510880950","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2015.0020","title":"Revisiting Qúebec's &lt;I&gt;Jus Commune&lt;/I&gt; in the Era of the Human Rights Charters","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Political science; Civil code; Human rights; Doctrine; Civil law (Civil law); Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Public law","score_opus":0.061877203646745885,"score_gpt":0.35406543297975,"score_spread":0.29218822933300415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510880950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9618514,0.0008550849,0.000009034787,0.014290916,0.00015030001,0.00027259547,0.0000035436383,0.000007100553,0.022560028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987976,0.000033595737,0.00009723918,0.00058744155,0.00037395282,0.000005554954,4.0042593e-7,0.0000056035396,0.00009863803],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99491835,0.003168404,0.0005769217,0.000103949664,0.00091002474,0.0003223404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704427,0.00084379304,0.0013042021,0.00027706916,0.0004408683,0.000089777],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002748432,0.00017494934,0.0006396534,0.000023881128,0.0015415708,0.000090806505,0.0014603275,0.000023620138,0.000017831302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056812823,0.0000741959,0.00022169249,0.0005465082,0.004098279,0.00024111441,0.000119189746,0.00060102757,0.00000880331],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013046683,0.00015111308,0.0024556362,0.000006433088,0.00027717746,0.000009870062,0.6751123,0.00024563615,0.0025759735,0.31163603,0.006401048,0.00099831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026096564,0.0012469727,0.21010946,0.00092592643,0.00034352732,0.000053440857,0.32295358,0.000101931844,0.0010188814,0.036692135,0.42312235,0.00082216423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031423005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007907863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41672128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019339389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000714915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511066864","doi":"","title":"The Fight for Substantive Equality: Women's Activism and Section 15 Of The Charter of Rights","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journals @ The Mount (Mount Saint Vincent University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Federated Co-operatives (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Charter; Political science; Humanities; Law; Art","score_opus":0.04261236098889637,"score_gpt":0.28505370369669375,"score_spread":0.24244134270779738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2511066864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98820174,0.00033122947,0.000119616416,0.009073609,0.00057267176,0.0007423729,0.000028063823,0.000014066672,0.0009166526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99835986,0.00043915983,0.000015838881,0.00008681384,0.00021667794,0.0000043668833,4.69357e-7,0.000005463437,0.000871375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795675,0.0006293974,0.00025250856,0.00016536374,0.0006381275,0.0003578638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979829,0.00056677574,0.000568595,0.00018756432,0.0005806683,0.0001134519],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018565868,0.00014362115,0.00025551225,0.00005284905,0.0021294022,0.000080092264,0.0005035846,0.000093645525,0.000019196277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023274704,0.00006826125,0.00015774107,0.0003767342,0.0007887968,0.00033457307,0.0001707063,0.00024149445,0.0000013710984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068279787,0.00019067066,0.00358829,0.00003506518,0.0006444203,0.00000390165,0.15244715,0.00007773509,0.0026309954,0.8367076,0.0014492851,0.0015421044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007560241,0.00009546954,0.0109735355,0.00007301317,0.00008748197,0.0000015090411,0.08223734,0.000058351012,0.00085853064,0.004667698,0.9000466,0.00014444994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007898294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004369525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8985973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007013458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001227291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512219276","doi":"","title":"Medical Assistance in Dying and 'Suicide Tourism' to Canada: Bill C-14 from a Comparative Perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Bill of rights; Government (linguistics); Political science; Perspective (graphical); Assisted suicide; Human rights","score_opus":0.022273101884235154,"score_gpt":0.3165878005676636,"score_spread":0.29431469868342847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512219276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9089698,0.004339447,0.00040483297,0.08371555,0.00019646026,0.00019234982,0.000007007896,0.000016867918,0.0021576523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996358,0.001787375,0.000069894064,0.00032098044,0.00036853342,0.000009141627,2.1103396e-7,0.0000063668363,0.0010795437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691117,0.0002932267,0.00023205191,0.00025530203,0.0007569257,0.0015513129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989747,0.00041043854,0.00010341262,0.000058278245,0.00018592938,0.0002672526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012248132,0.0001378429,0.00027949945,0.000041254676,0.0006083117,0.000054418404,0.00025752938,0.00007905476,0.00007571034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000927261,0.00007811496,0.000037257123,0.0002081443,0.00020352226,0.00015565881,0.00005960815,0.0008187847,0.00000629242],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006181615,0.00025393855,0.21495168,0.0000058245196,0.0012916793,0.0002808656,0.3443132,0.000018919336,0.0014097211,0.35195285,0.00809788,0.07680527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030461873,0.00026076924,0.17096041,0.00042572492,0.00005221958,0.000031217227,0.64656943,0.000024569765,0.00012360496,0.147098,0.030536417,0.0008714656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91882604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99794346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3022562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008965375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046996176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512364812","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4678","title":"AN INTRODUCTION TO EXPLORING LAW, DISABILITY, AND THE CHALLENGE OF EQUALITY IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES: PAPERS FROM THE BERKELEY SYMPOSIUM","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.08863503913113079,"score_gpt":0.32989222137544344,"score_spread":0.24125718224431264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512364812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89407814,0.00015035426,0.0000023223797,0.10388685,0.00019295815,0.00061463454,0.000020091808,0.000008195048,0.0010464414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99863875,0.00024943455,0.00002446338,0.00063543825,0.0003707653,0.000058805574,0.0000031077566,0.0000056985946,0.000013510943],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981093,0.0007628989,0.00026653497,0.0002261125,0.00044047175,0.00019472073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981345,0.0012348847,0.00010554701,0.00025338927,0.00015612997,0.00011555618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017915021,0.00010375092,0.00024441577,0.000012088293,0.00028864926,0.00008363115,0.00045750744,0.00002940502,0.00001074663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092884264,0.000052069066,0.000019803176,0.00025332655,0.0011545625,0.00028817603,0.00025467682,0.00013339848,3.6697037e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016090913,0.000110024164,0.05750034,0.00013841035,0.00015778384,9.247822e-7,0.8798792,0.004993687,0.00010914764,0.052593395,0.0008853515,0.0020226536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003441027,0.0001268732,0.23687324,0.000117927746,0.00040153065,1.9697596e-7,0.7269382,0.00045240228,0.00020558326,0.0025740599,0.028469354,0.0003996364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98853725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9767437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17937289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022655031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009530414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42540336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512835946","doi":"10.29173/alr18","title":"Wigs, Skeletons, Bibs, Bands, and Bundles: An Albertan Barrister Deciphers the English Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Division (mathematics); Sociology; Criminal justice; European court of justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Business; European Union law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.022684148509780993,"score_gpt":0.3081267086105219,"score_spread":0.28544256010074087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512835946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3722383,0.2398586,0.000069928356,0.048918463,0.0017126575,0.0048741437,0.00003620921,0.00018576965,0.33210593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95996135,0.0355873,0.00015957264,0.0028958335,0.00032476164,0.000052363877,0.000014233089,0.000021069249,0.0009834999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738234,0.00080402545,0.00048791963,0.000376769,0.00051528664,0.00043367286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755365,0.0013279188,0.00023487199,0.00039988413,0.00023691902,0.00024676716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013122779,0.00025161362,0.0005893955,0.000013931187,0.0011658965,0.000106444495,0.00052781455,0.00010326945,0.00029306897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017534461,0.00015040401,0.00016811013,0.00024396952,0.001040148,0.00037620612,0.00014164981,0.00019085204,0.00003399166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031106716,0.00031036374,0.031413883,0.003066783,0.00037971543,0.0000022747777,0.10271517,0.0000025716506,0.000022123217,0.7297891,0.039664995,0.09260193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021775269,0.000085885426,0.0047896025,0.0010865115,0.0002343653,0.0000010817505,0.0027692416,0.000007841372,0.0000057775715,0.00018531331,0.99036413,0.00025249223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08049113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13202432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95069915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005444438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003995714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92563194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513256715","doi":"10.7202/1119728ar","title":"Constitutionalizing Women's Equality Rights: There is Always Room For Improvement","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitution; Constitutionalism; Humanities; Law; Democracy; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.18159398755495232,"score_gpt":0.4401749347296547,"score_spread":0.25858094717470237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513256715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19563057,0.05286889,0.0056065433,0.08373413,0.02602672,0.008583523,0.001238016,0.0014793909,0.6248322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908286,0.00063930434,0.0012202869,0.002920251,0.0025548069,0.00047051432,0.00001592552,0.00001740829,0.0013329105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960769,0.00039213433,0.00059658225,0.0006478247,0.001035864,0.0012507084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972231,0.00088806875,0.00012468992,0.00013569852,0.0013122417,0.00031624557],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016068226,0.00038426244,0.00068851263,0.00002968824,0.0035808154,0.00015820659,0.00039265156,0.00032607492,0.0000673103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043486194,0.00029501112,0.00020546901,0.00037459072,0.0021684181,0.00039668012,0.0002858569,0.00037631614,0.000040966865],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056880304,0.00018124677,0.00043264724,0.00030091914,0.00030621627,0.000018056773,0.33216456,0.0000026751622,0.000041146748,0.59020805,0.07589368,0.00039391775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010112793,0.000085337015,0.00035421117,0.000050382005,0.0002690379,0.0000011817672,0.44056344,0.0000067748747,0.000025215242,0.040985115,0.5161768,0.00047118394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023350697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018557742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.795198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018897357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017599417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513322953","doi":"10.29173/alr372","title":"Covenant Marriage and the Conflict of Laws","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Subject-matter jurisdiction; State (computer science); Legislature; Declaration; Choice of law; Sociology; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.07688570775768638,"score_gpt":0.35070404262717914,"score_spread":0.27381833486949275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513322953","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050029713,0.4079579,0.000001302292,0.060614407,0.00024721806,0.0014275514,0.0000043354135,0.000019019102,0.52472526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7114474,0.2719942,0.00008262121,0.0075441855,0.00017511344,0.00008950848,0.0000032552532,0.000011397223,0.008652312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988656,0.00039155217,0.00022097254,0.00011398016,0.00024638252,0.00016149176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989026,0.000626235,0.00012577158,0.00013898239,0.00011359128,0.00009281424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012408884,0.000084027124,0.000366163,0.0000025776083,0.00025034184,0.000023455617,0.0001826597,0.000034330496,0.000082305676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013503868,0.000041010084,0.00008022403,0.00010294912,0.001071162,0.00009120802,0.00007881156,0.000063611325,0.00004959192],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007873773,0.000010429823,0.00025954057,0.00024334586,0.000041850144,5.6220466e-7,0.010346956,5.886688e-8,0.0000016023222,0.9763269,0.010860488,0.0019003915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035791227,0.000010271744,0.00010456698,0.00043275303,0.00007186457,7.1553393e-7,0.0004932114,9.0306196e-7,0.0000047131134,0.0005100801,0.99794644,0.0000665755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14081578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98708594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027820546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030719817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98471856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514979753","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199366989.003.0007","title":"Judicial Interviews of Children in Canada’s Family Courts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.054809493362080706,"score_gpt":0.25224733838624375,"score_spread":0.19743784502416303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2514979753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031660702,0.00043748197,0.0000018668967,0.00012447369,0.0002594037,0.0005247689,0.00017940128,0.00002526584,0.9952813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05167704,0.0010726593,0.00004545085,0.000072521885,0.00018295641,8.320951e-7,0.000023284114,0.00002253299,0.9469027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841845,0.000098707846,0.0002517947,0.0002924118,0.00062432897,0.00031428182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905705,0.000054171076,0.0003156866,0.0001810662,0.00023224717,0.00015976444],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002268541,0.0002484359,0.00055247586,0.00007240211,0.0002328555,0.000013937972,0.0006058896,0.0002539756,0.000036946625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028265365,0.00025996647,0.00013046405,0.000010770694,0.00040994745,0.0000777183,0.00035004082,0.00034188153,5.666616e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014583315,0.000024791778,0.0007325722,0.0000614691,0.0004340786,0.000121174846,0.020980334,0.00001765507,0.0000042461565,0.89637256,0.0655664,0.015538864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003560592,0.00001934689,0.00095560873,0.00013696765,0.00007632428,2.425479e-7,0.0018392903,0.0000013931989,0.000002784476,0.00030272544,0.99603397,0.00027528856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97419155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98304397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93046755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021979052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016753568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515145673","doi":"10.1086/518071","title":"<i>Awesome Families: The Promise of Healing Relationships in the International Churches of Christ</i>. By Kathleen E. Jenkins. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 2005. Pp. 283. $22.95.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Sociology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; State (computer science); Sociology; Library science; Media studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.032370217958947185,"score_gpt":0.2908158166519007,"score_spread":0.2584455986929535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515145673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9680816,0.004527731,0.00021643462,0.019912729,0.00023727062,0.00026969437,0.000012466092,0.000009733481,0.00673235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941051,0.0044793556,0.0006794264,0.0002555752,0.00022607841,4.5146268e-7,0.000002174903,0.0000057990014,0.00024603464],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775046,0.00083877885,0.000527329,0.00012604393,0.00045090955,0.00030648636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659216,0.0018977153,0.0010945447,0.00010671538,0.00022590341,0.00008296541],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032885175,0.00011613651,0.00037533004,0.000048866015,0.0003653229,0.000011401911,0.00083035394,0.000096223725,0.000021704947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078752806,0.00007440855,0.00016435607,0.00025549007,0.0033025683,0.00018258682,0.00006466114,0.00057472056,0.0000010263894],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006307611,0.0003615547,0.31400323,0.000023497223,0.00069778686,0.000025239684,0.58676285,0.0003278141,0.0041936617,0.019151231,0.06645216,0.0073702405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015229202,0.00044099265,0.22631371,0.00010434887,0.00014136855,0.000011887123,0.6218501,0.000019182318,0.00045158408,0.0012621972,0.14759439,0.0002873024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03279826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012801758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08768951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027798308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044595654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516069109","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.109-5313","title":"Birth control often not covered by Canadian insurers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Birth control; Supreme court; Health insurance; Control (management); Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Supreme Court Decisions; Business; Health care; Family planning; Medicine; Law; Political science; Computer science; Environmental health; Population","score_opus":0.008626831637923901,"score_gpt":0.2418798502073168,"score_spread":0.2332530185693929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516069109","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08655822,0.0004046616,0.00005200756,0.88047236,0.0026821592,0.0003278637,0.0007371579,0.000055493536,0.028710054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9580242,0.00039334016,0.000015742711,0.032135524,0.0016167926,0.000008998586,0.0000035396179,0.000013328306,0.007788518],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958697,0.00052431127,0.0003837375,0.00018757192,0.0018995928,0.0011351102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938407,0.00047849058,0.00022924806,0.000072240226,0.00060494675,0.004774407],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026225944,0.00014765585,0.00026742186,0.00012171315,0.0018811021,0.00019163243,0.00042510542,0.00051587634,0.0070132213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009529072,0.00010402386,0.0001262689,0.00024709833,0.00022717779,0.0003061469,0.000009359204,0.00052138005,0.0005335485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066703624,0.000009384909,0.09435977,0.0000014342944,0.00018183605,0.000085175045,0.002913192,3.63131e-7,0.000038097984,0.0012722997,0.87035906,0.030772738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011279267,0.000017341945,0.030048372,0.000028886561,0.000014373862,0.0000053238346,0.0015288558,0.0000034694456,0.0000048525044,0.00010542418,0.9669351,0.00018006806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83068323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9843074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.871466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00829927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007206875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517375444","doi":"10.7202/1037165ar","title":"Faire basculer le climat de profilage social à Ottawa : le Programme de contestation des contraventions","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Reflets Revue d’intervention sociale et communautaire","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06834831655059878,"score_gpt":0.3618031001246399,"score_spread":0.2934547835740411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517375444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52361166,0.010049662,0.020047637,0.3917783,0.002117056,0.0033228,0.0004749181,0.00097399467,0.04762397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8686361,0.0006712517,0.0018255436,0.00032380494,0.0007422221,0.00044653678,0.0000711337,0.00008537768,0.12719804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99147046,0.0045001833,0.0011560707,0.0005907173,0.0005623424,0.0017202549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969622,0.0005942951,0.0009206467,0.00033245917,0.0008392809,0.00035110104],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004158854,0.0005353007,0.00080877583,0.0000909687,0.005287179,0.000415653,0.00068709237,0.00069344905,0.0004515876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014109743,0.0005025175,0.0014694346,0.0005657289,0.00311536,0.0014931782,0.0003079968,0.0006522184,0.00016231726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006584126,0.0018026108,0.0067816493,0.00091226504,0.00059450144,0.000035467023,0.08622794,0.0000036482738,0.0012110131,0.5263906,0.0063211713,0.36965325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010110209,0.00065989286,0.17477441,0.007526179,0.00062303146,0.00006637797,0.14134291,0.00017701239,0.00070827984,0.124797896,0.5369655,0.0022483193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0155627085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039767064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5306443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003069425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008138912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518125099","doi":"","title":"The Form and Substance of Aboriginal Rights: Assimilation, Recognition, Reconciliation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Treaty; Sovereignty; Indigenous rights; Political science; Law; Politics; Colonialism; Constitutional law; Sociology","score_opus":0.015765801893228414,"score_gpt":0.2910238731274726,"score_spread":0.2752580712342442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518125099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9660304,0.004557987,0.0016795044,0.022259474,0.00037019947,0.00024125693,0.0000068778136,0.000031184354,0.004823111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680893,0.029441692,0.00006803466,0.00002298153,0.00030847377,0.0000063166526,5.451181e-7,0.0000039143238,0.0020587363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984007,0.00013517476,0.00023859892,0.00009922963,0.00030848267,0.00081779645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892104,0.00029342866,0.00025197974,0.000050667677,0.0004340576,0.000048820304],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002217956,0.00007339083,0.000098213764,0.00001933746,0.0016086014,0.000044788714,0.00012955394,0.00005205689,0.00002466128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002443358,0.00003591617,0.000045108205,0.00012486042,0.00030790968,0.00042800402,0.000004971656,0.00027128277,0.000007847965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012173399,0.0000325597,0.025599264,0.000004904944,0.00022907357,5.2316045e-7,0.016846102,3.8620846e-7,0.00043041434,0.644598,0.0013417576,0.31079528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006344466,0.00010083523,0.015099589,0.000049764098,0.000031867614,0.000009724364,0.008395559,0.0000021362632,0.00021901444,0.8606654,0.114648044,0.00014365677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007762968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.066861145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3106516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095511845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054383563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519228174","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1327","title":"Judging the Limits of Cooperative Federalism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Constitution; Law; Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Originalism; Constitutional law; Political science; Meaning (existential); Separation of powers; Treaty; Constitutional economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07962996588047687,"score_gpt":0.3566823282573796,"score_spread":0.2770523623769027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519228174","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014490009,0.29370856,0.000101799254,0.48757073,0.00095801346,0.0032698677,0.000045480738,0.0002064754,0.19964905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85874724,0.1345588,0.000086028056,0.0034366,0.00022078876,0.00006111702,0.0000010803732,0.00000988935,0.0028784408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838036,0.00046297943,0.00028789308,0.00017513386,0.00041540162,0.00027823172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998837,0.00038936822,0.00013924847,0.00018402888,0.00038494158,0.00006543949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009955931,0.00012531101,0.00034499637,0.000005171319,0.0009444552,0.000035398807,0.00034335788,0.000045078876,0.00047355707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007938492,0.000054029504,0.00013857297,0.00016568304,0.00074705057,0.00021731212,0.00006649025,0.00008063889,0.00011941009],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055446126,0.00004459477,0.00064415316,0.00051061646,0.00015026235,0.0000026994628,0.009675103,4.137375e-7,0.00085528876,0.9129862,0.051388983,0.02373615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011649813,0.000015388745,0.00034982275,0.0021946332,0.00005316877,4.4367897e-7,0.00043034245,2.9177997e-7,0.00023070621,0.0003609483,0.9961265,0.000121305246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002604673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003709694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9447375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009680626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056383695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7264081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519708604","doi":"","title":"Justice that is Healing: Responding to Domestic Violence in Aboriginal Communities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UWSpace (University of Waterloo)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Restorative justice; Criminology; Economic Justice; Domestic violence; Political science; Psychology; Law; Medicine; Medical emergency; Suicide prevention; Poison control","score_opus":0.045348481866779915,"score_gpt":0.31732768999024724,"score_spread":0.2719792081234673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519708604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926766,0.00024523123,0.0000022835238,0.0013808402,0.00050396717,0.00038633245,0.00003152333,0.00005714544,0.0047160424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6632351,0.0023588787,0.00097181724,0.00007355555,0.000062944135,0.0000017081317,0.000056453406,0.000017140454,0.33322236],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837893,0.00027445852,0.00013444173,0.00026558046,0.00049113116,0.00045543094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989774,0.00018786249,0.0002204599,0.00021216323,0.00024935833,0.00015271058],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044224455,0.00023495809,0.00045034828,0.000503583,0.0011459034,0.000041789048,0.0007462773,0.00028545072,0.0003048546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054512235,0.00026270593,0.00011461186,0.00063739234,0.00030432496,0.00032726148,0.00007728041,0.00038853104,0.00008302287],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021016723,0.00003741084,0.00358663,0.00021177962,0.00004323996,0.000026954387,0.99210894,0.000008300381,0.00009124799,0.0024319654,0.0004758595,0.0007674945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025157514,0.000059029546,0.018609341,0.0010805118,0.00017305349,2.8833244e-7,0.9736261,0.000006670553,0.00011889497,0.00023406313,0.0055164937,0.00032402892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76144695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7566711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3294415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036751895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016552048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520057185","doi":"","title":"Do we have a right to assisted suicide","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eureka street","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Project commissioning; Kingdom; Assisted suicide; Publishing; Political science","score_opus":0.04912018951746322,"score_gpt":0.33785009229180474,"score_spread":0.2887299027743415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520057185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5278159,0.0011321523,0.00027602483,0.0802165,0.0013264491,0.0010757919,0.000045099692,0.00058525614,0.38752684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889158,0.00006578312,0.0009500243,0.00054023945,0.0006656662,0.00002818563,0.0000030281344,0.000012148012,0.008819122],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824286,0.00027714495,0.00018712247,0.00030826541,0.0005162634,0.00046832653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991347,0.0002196585,0.000070529924,0.00019419182,0.0001309878,0.00024993907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046220553,0.00015800625,0.0002249278,0.00003677984,0.0008096233,0.00012317463,0.00034098886,0.000098029624,0.00046144123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079385284,0.00012035392,0.0000977534,0.0002342975,0.00018726567,0.00011851978,0.00010732713,0.00013993104,0.0004005296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007253562,0.00031054657,0.21579304,0.000053782744,0.00027558903,0.000051946932,0.13539355,0.00005666512,0.0016758855,0.07645038,0.43313393,0.13673215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023285291,0.000047676334,0.07021119,0.000046257846,0.000019237985,2.5916307e-7,0.0053375755,0.000008228051,0.00023896804,0.0007111321,0.92290497,0.00024168131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071654245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048564628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.489771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014708705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028266728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520191619","doi":"","title":"Stepping into Canada's Shoes: Tsilhqot'In, Grassy Narrows and the Division of Powers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Qualified immunity; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.006590381850983854,"score_gpt":0.25677871693873267,"score_spread":0.2501883350877488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520191619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96082115,0.007966761,0.00013146343,0.029240923,0.00025736218,0.00021479056,0.0000010298647,0.000009289393,0.0013572002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897779,0.009415566,0.000015868245,0.00006576914,0.00010684022,0.000003658246,7.9712194e-8,0.0000057375446,0.00060856924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976554,0.00032868166,0.00026301,0.00013018963,0.00047433167,0.0011484047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991708,0.00041275565,0.00017143838,0.000070208924,0.000105352796,0.000069481925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027773115,0.00010264827,0.00021036725,0.000031555657,0.00071838184,0.00003198372,0.0002694029,0.000050299186,0.000017283355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083189644,0.000048860256,0.00006087829,0.00015433347,0.00046394678,0.00016921166,0.00005702968,0.0004727709,0.0000010288859],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036210063,0.0000756123,0.14927228,0.000027416923,0.0006123084,0.000010973354,0.09321787,0.000021484486,0.0026128415,0.57193553,0.0015004269,0.18035114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0105015505,0.0003945301,0.094598256,0.00066421967,0.00012309077,0.00003667678,0.49521744,0.000032209475,0.00025669523,0.36008328,0.037162982,0.0009290903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6210439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.976421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40199956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019435626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017818365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5525285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521120568","doi":"","title":"Book Review ― Michael Plaxton, Implied Consent and Sexual Assault: Intimate Relationships, Autonomy, and Voice. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2015","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Autonomy; Queen (butterfly); Normative; Law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Sexual violence; Sociology; Medicine; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.01908635183959502,"score_gpt":0.2753849384565644,"score_spread":0.2562985866169694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521120568","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09482149,0.54397637,0.0006284715,0.33787954,0.0006372571,0.0028366197,0.0001748113,0.00047619815,0.018569285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.265348,0.6823057,0.00012372086,0.0008706013,0.0002710332,0.0000065409517,0.0000041375383,0.00002393857,0.051046338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973834,0.00046770254,0.0002653319,0.00029363242,0.00033377667,0.0012561678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887484,0.0003389622,0.00028415813,0.00009828532,0.00019381187,0.00020993865],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018675538,0.00019535897,0.00030521196,0.000036401125,0.001890109,0.00005092853,0.00018604155,0.000140363,0.0000318645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037847264,0.00013911113,0.00005749952,0.00009170797,0.00046808508,0.00055386673,0.00012188969,0.0009002341,0.000011780068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041799806,0.00023486778,0.02419251,0.00042406868,0.002063817,0.00006852017,0.014506114,0.0000046107666,0.00045922975,0.46921197,0.4249366,0.06347971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011007127,0.00011346549,0.012769658,0.00030066737,0.00021238819,0.00006410863,0.005327909,0.0000038889657,0.000008129279,0.0034446716,0.9763113,0.0003430715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069929687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004648378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55137473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001845874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094245694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523449894","doi":"","title":"The joint declaration, method, and the hermeneutics of ecumenical consensus : The joint Declaration of the Doctrine of Justification soteriological and ecclesiological implications","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of ecumenical studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Confessional; Proclamation; Faith; Ecumenism; Doctrine; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.20694622966378506,"score_gpt":0.4044791756667552,"score_spread":0.1975329460029701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523449894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8941197,0.005451969,0.00022202358,0.09929055,0.00013632797,0.0005483643,0.000004951908,0.0000056818426,0.00022045156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98154354,0.01709324,0.00096691574,0.00018553909,0.00013164381,0.000021155238,2.974221e-7,0.0000037567431,0.00005393616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959522,0.0018360744,0.0013187814,0.00017191135,0.0004912803,0.00022973944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99279547,0.004541208,0.0013700462,0.00022909507,0.0009975396,0.00006665748],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004919401,0.00015879053,0.00062239094,0.000019628418,0.0015314417,0.000047622023,0.00036570244,0.00013351558,0.0000065694594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008447069,0.00005512574,0.00024590065,0.00026867163,0.005730984,0.00007420101,0.00031697136,0.00036849728,3.201781e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030841902,0.0010240945,0.053431448,0.00017309411,0.004221289,0.0000065930517,0.09401011,0.0011278938,0.08457593,0.6907877,0.0066667036,0.060890988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020319205,0.0005635821,0.86037683,0.00010144133,0.00074160285,0.00006654883,0.039184883,0.00024852736,0.002168711,0.08608222,0.008221714,0.00021199642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015048092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045201217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8069454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098094315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000084303785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524703956","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1436","title":"Lesbians, Gay Men, and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Charter; Heteronormativity; Heterosexuality; Gender studies; Homosexuality; Doctrine; Sociology; Political subjectivity; Politics; Law; Political science; Gay rights; Human sexuality; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02972727297493665,"score_gpt":0.2596051398160271,"score_spread":0.22987786684109046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524703956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012648459,0.0043852506,0.0000030633885,0.02286943,0.00018521896,0.00018826502,0.000008815799,0.000010411867,0.95970106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99688315,0.00076271925,0.00011782607,0.00023127964,0.00028569583,0.0000028956656,2.255837e-7,0.000004433953,0.00171176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889976,0.00020525613,0.000181434,0.00010583509,0.00030333086,0.0003043865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935365,0.000100897974,0.000104467545,0.0000650862,0.000105106665,0.00027076504],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006016045,0.00009617606,0.00018844086,0.000020365873,0.0031332932,0.00019347931,0.0001578038,0.00007737322,0.00035690088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053703276,0.00005368343,0.000052973937,0.000059461527,0.0015462372,0.00019770242,0.000025407966,0.00023126496,0.0000105498075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012942464,0.000020927608,0.0017222677,0.000006983542,0.00012412408,0.000020988296,0.082014345,0.0000012256238,0.000030123329,0.9024406,0.011713708,0.0018917538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009203645,0.00022060028,0.027533589,0.0002929088,0.0003855399,0.00027611858,0.038832918,0.00053330255,0.00019140178,0.27867255,0.64270055,0.001156882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9428442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9913576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9842347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009327882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001808538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2526262749","doi":"10.18566/escr.v24n52.a07","title":"MUNDO CERRADO, MUNDO ABIERTO LAS ESTRUCTURAS DEL PENSAMIENTO MODERNO SEGÚN CHARLES TAYLOR","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Escritos","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendence (philosophy); Secularity; Modernity; Immanence; The Imaginary; Reification (Marxism); Philosophy; Late modernity; Epistemology; Sociology; Humanities; Religious studies; Social science; Psychoanalysis; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.040023203401870155,"score_gpt":0.3028362919719272,"score_spread":0.26281308857005703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2526262749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9438629,0.0016905434,0.00041017352,0.021752171,0.002092066,0.0010551023,0.000064534404,0.00060059567,0.02847191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833462,0.00048282242,0.00083541195,0.00033760653,0.0012402242,0.00008358831,0.000004464892,0.000035725163,0.013633904],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970475,0.00026267147,0.00036797786,0.0005585008,0.00085373654,0.00090962445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986374,0.00030317117,0.0001464023,0.00033751078,0.00025135285,0.00032419665],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003412147,0.00033566327,0.0003995966,0.000060915572,0.001510944,0.00019068008,0.00064636493,0.00020970766,0.0007947511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008289223,0.00021813207,0.00021629795,0.0002399922,0.00077698915,0.0006922821,0.00021655041,0.00019773007,0.0006745366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033330824,0.00055509224,0.087821305,0.00018203037,0.0008351028,0.00016004623,0.27653852,0.000024995945,0.12671477,0.098469265,0.07359952,0.33476603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004243013,0.00022287823,0.09635685,0.00032373413,0.00021433721,0.000016056585,0.041767634,0.00026662243,0.006673047,0.014597608,0.83266795,0.0026502905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019677898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009097476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7590684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005028433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075782606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527490089","doi":"10.1017/cls.2016.18","title":"Lignes directrices facultatives en matière de pensions alimentaires pour époux – Pertinence de leur application au Québec?","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020221033900966353,"score_gpt":0.289382390083335,"score_spread":0.26916135618236864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527490089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82757145,0.009204795,0.00036482408,0.15614258,0.0004935208,0.00030698383,0.00019129217,0.000018808789,0.005705728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97278285,0.0034102339,0.0010374954,0.002412837,0.001160709,0.000024593503,0.0000034756017,0.00003346078,0.019134343],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713707,0.0004985316,0.00057181175,0.00034886878,0.00018701948,0.0012567244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959002,0.0011267388,0.0005226744,0.00013903518,0.00048746116,0.0018238983],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014642372,0.00033702687,0.0005487359,0.000047186004,0.0021026689,0.00014099531,0.00046602695,0.0003368598,0.00017293362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066769944,0.00028053508,0.00044460496,0.00025537342,0.0016640456,0.00070356554,0.000040273688,0.0004020273,0.000012977324],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010175882,0.000044986384,0.016640209,0.00016748699,0.00057964603,0.0000767366,0.78589857,0.000020005915,0.002513877,0.16342705,0.0062321345,0.024389146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015258774,0.00028464626,0.059495445,0.0013466869,0.0007272865,0.00031772337,0.40842456,0.00023082388,0.00038307454,0.013829453,0.5122476,0.0011868156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.949822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98808926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5060155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009857809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048675286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527836442","doi":"","title":"The Function (or Malfunction) of Equity in the Charity Law of Canada's Federal Courts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Equity (law); Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Principal (computer security); Federal court; Law and economics; Economics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.025473556325641272,"score_gpt":0.30492819249337977,"score_spread":0.27945463616773847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527836442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9133972,0.0023289192,0.00031110816,0.06276836,0.0010139407,0.0004413581,0.0000071416553,0.000013979497,0.019718003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995782,0.0018483133,0.0000024306414,0.00010727106,0.00022888523,0.0000056662943,1.6158961e-7,0.0000031880668,0.0020220715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974636,0.00033859976,0.00036892918,0.000086479515,0.0006547577,0.0010876476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989131,0.00035862494,0.00042429235,0.00008278141,0.00018495023,0.000036271427],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004926489,0.00007878143,0.00014805245,0.000010977853,0.0014683834,0.0000360815,0.0003286794,0.000048194852,0.000040405965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060954405,0.000030509102,0.00007148206,0.00012429894,0.00035411905,0.00015687756,0.000039466708,0.0005003273,0.0000010595467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021624348,0.000045867124,0.007321922,0.0000048663464,0.00011286821,0.000001008788,0.0026242638,0.0000030432168,0.00022076027,0.9659062,0.0011069397,0.022436043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022865834,0.00091679156,0.25696445,0.00012377945,0.00010082351,0.00004506596,0.12712298,0.000007824422,0.00028698926,0.46614742,0.14558434,0.0004129592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.523079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99245644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49975875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017734357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031963885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528066927","doi":"10.3138/9781442657151-004","title":"2. A.H.F. Lefroy: Common Law Thought in Late-Nineteenth-Century Canada – On Burying One’s Grandfather","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Law; Philosophy; Genealogy; Political science","score_opus":0.024764788651226867,"score_gpt":0.22559631994111717,"score_spread":0.2008315312898903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528066927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007134191,0.0022149407,7.240544e-7,0.00013506557,0.00026527458,0.0005021538,0.00010833478,0.000051735646,0.99600834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05665136,0.0011550076,0.00007142466,0.00008899341,0.0001689364,7.075515e-7,0.000025928219,0.000029428276,0.9418082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823755,0.00010850548,0.00022377812,0.0003683692,0.0006875356,0.00037426985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991143,0.00013592337,0.00028336278,0.00023566242,0.000115419825,0.000115383686],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014850072,0.0003075374,0.0005643291,0.000016537713,0.00060606055,0.000027149006,0.0005088062,0.00036318976,0.00019615775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000070145347,0.00033864443,0.00016155405,0.0000022622744,0.00052849366,0.00011767007,0.00018668504,0.00031879492,0.0000031823447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022152846,0.00006996121,0.00010238961,0.00011508028,0.00033406576,0.00014205166,0.031807434,0.0001267351,0.000016725231,0.93586546,0.027352901,0.0038456486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052582595,0.000028176291,0.0002506773,0.00028659365,0.00008425419,5.8147755e-8,0.00042356053,0.0000039041734,0.000015500571,0.00021922642,0.99779505,0.00036717585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9986298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9704422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021245768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015823102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528111427","doi":"10.3138/9781442683921-022","title":"Publications of the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; History","score_opus":0.04321427344463247,"score_gpt":0.2355772955384672,"score_spread":0.19236302209383474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528111427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00000889274,0.0019734122,0.000006165384,0.00077865296,0.00018967278,0.00062269147,0.0001791555,0.000025565076,0.9962158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019476301,0.00035400907,0.00042325078,0.00005555136,0.000090824105,7.8360523e-7,0.00000782765,0.000008283587,0.99711186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999161,0.000026196056,0.00012574925,0.00019173117,0.00028172726,0.00021357558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988895,0.00006154587,0.00028651106,0.0002348597,0.00039837262,0.00012921797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001385887,0.00013665357,0.0002488476,0.000009180677,0.0007586948,0.000009890492,0.00067320664,0.0002822644,0.00023565326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030536896,0.00013044325,0.00053102215,0.0000012248178,0.0008696123,0.0001288936,0.00008472065,0.0001192783,6.6722254e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070938795,0.000007033283,0.0000055345204,0.000027344824,0.00018477095,1.6591781e-7,0.0437135,9.808692e-7,0.00000804794,0.8066783,0.14689268,0.0024745318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014323887,0.000014277199,0.00021958443,0.000037540587,0.00015022776,5.3955684e-8,0.00090595876,0.0000024414617,0.0000038384137,0.00032697633,0.99806046,0.0001354169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9814242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9881113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8511678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003161644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080792897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8267589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528186113","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1336","title":"Kahkewistahaw First Nation v. Taypotat: An Arbitrary Approach to Discrimination","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Commission; Political science; Focus (optics); Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.09264882175162263,"score_gpt":0.33085775457067607,"score_spread":0.23820893281905342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528186113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012361643,0.06648814,0.0026566936,0.22012258,0.001436128,0.0076468824,0.00013267118,0.00091973104,0.6882355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93868965,0.04359239,0.005334855,0.006400448,0.0008512108,0.00062537263,0.00007102267,0.000050188126,0.004384881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978401,0.000325087,0.00034603913,0.0004102226,0.0006809897,0.0003975702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989424,0.0001226109,0.00012115868,0.00025789803,0.0003178782,0.00023807462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010639215,0.00019369605,0.00033880112,0.000023812412,0.0009453025,0.00008238105,0.00038875375,0.000082520404,0.00020549065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005868916,0.00012169747,0.00012434719,0.00028908264,0.00027832438,0.0008269079,0.000074209944,0.00008864616,0.00025409035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000977615,0.00024552556,0.00026289764,0.0011302317,0.000050713526,0.000002650975,0.010252608,8.8874646e-7,0.00013264437,0.9268989,0.027058352,0.033954788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015085434,0.00003663583,0.0015543444,0.0013112846,0.000065160566,9.815335e-7,0.0005201919,0.0000034817404,0.000024519697,0.0015208218,0.9945227,0.00028902636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00427782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008339884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9674643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003491397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049413702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7270598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528615719","doi":"10.21991/c92q2k","title":"Kahkewistahaw First Nation v Taypotat – Whither Section 25 of the Charter?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Section (typography); Charter; Law; Plea; Jurisprudence; Respondent; Political science; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Sociology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.0325850467279558,"score_gpt":0.2637665648854747,"score_spread":0.23118151815751886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528615719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12896562,0.001746461,0.06420231,0.30441657,0.023622539,0.004500678,0.0011814457,0.0008475428,0.47051683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962647,0.00013635856,0.00017014958,0.00040922122,0.00035607698,0.00009552154,0.00001019009,0.000007890089,0.0025498758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974692,0.00015888852,0.00051271607,0.0003964934,0.0008445135,0.00061822584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982757,0.0003056431,0.00033448648,0.00027865905,0.00066175696,0.00014375462],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004671025,0.00025956327,0.00028221268,0.0000948159,0.0037982953,0.00006664716,0.00044437218,0.00023020594,0.00046622983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011835764,0.0001556366,0.000293906,0.00047372375,0.010368326,0.0008338188,0.00016857394,0.0001693397,0.00013762759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023739238,0.00006923168,0.033852775,0.00001237394,0.00007564715,0.0000012291678,0.00077902945,0.00004736909,0.0010094679,0.95556706,0.007343628,0.0012184686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015930377,0.000042930034,0.015468193,0.00040382042,0.000076472475,0.000024485067,0.00532017,0.00003159759,0.0008713033,0.013590201,0.9620891,0.0004886544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015311156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008313704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95474553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007323041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007550775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99749863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529637341","doi":"10.3138/9781442685901-009","title":"6. Expedition Sailors: The Ombudsman in Newfoundland and Labrador","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Archaeology; History","score_opus":0.028224250752484813,"score_gpt":0.24399650254272884,"score_spread":0.21577225179024404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529637341","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009054626,0.0023806267,0.0000018360076,0.00034092602,0.00009648737,0.00039543022,0.000019782747,0.000031279687,0.99582815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0122831315,0.003356831,0.00009160676,0.000038357946,0.00022291044,3.9118925e-7,0.0000055802243,0.000008360647,0.9839928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915975,0.00006636843,0.000109570414,0.0002112702,0.00028337265,0.00016965215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994751,0.00009639962,0.00015851793,0.00012953076,0.00007703037,0.000063377054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015609477,0.00015388799,0.00024953406,0.000010872891,0.00047924637,0.000030384652,0.0002748739,0.00022221751,0.00015981236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015923959,0.00013372213,0.000077296514,0.0000010663666,0.0006590584,0.00016294976,0.00011707957,0.00014910681,0.000002236226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012492413,0.00002731208,0.00011245181,0.000058935482,0.00016278306,0.000035543235,0.3512674,0.0000019435483,0.000015070583,0.5627008,0.008525345,0.07696751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030671095,0.00003535492,0.001855623,0.00010086001,0.000054924385,2.4708294e-7,0.0030190437,0.0000017036397,0.0000011337237,0.000982436,0.9934743,0.00016766603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7689429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85180485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98494893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005963624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003479986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.545303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2539682818","doi":"10.1017/s0008423916000822","title":"Eliminating Indigenous Jurisdictions: Federalism, the Supreme Court of Canada, and Territorial Rationalities of Power","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Indigenous; Law; Sovereignty; Denial; Power (physics); Jurisdiction; Politics","score_opus":0.01859644538915065,"score_gpt":0.28004074913243465,"score_spread":0.261444303743284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2539682818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9756152,0.00014201879,0.000016630154,0.021297624,0.0008891157,0.00008326418,0.000051327745,0.0000015503385,0.0019032883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991949,0.0000077516215,0.000079511854,0.00013776639,0.00037317353,9.733504e-7,6.535505e-8,0.0000021964458,0.00020365333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818116,0.00010429344,0.00033159752,0.00008363972,0.00072275975,0.0005765732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778837,0.0004957325,0.00017629734,0.00006036481,0.0008012285,0.0006780129],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013108412,0.0000639155,0.00015233885,0.000062224986,0.0012791693,0.00006299005,0.00034617865,0.000036355996,0.000067634435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032920586,0.000034946577,0.000038705253,0.00016319453,0.0034114537,0.00029275985,0.0000211819,0.00008730831,2.1127542e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056840336,0.000009257672,0.028547537,0.000007541019,0.000023973844,0.0000077222985,0.041057095,0.0000017285986,0.00071958604,0.92780393,0.0012977036,0.00051825866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041632642,0.00015217293,0.9327155,0.0001622981,0.000030736268,0.000023163311,0.03885649,0.0000025654704,0.0016885824,0.0095153265,0.016253691,0.00018316558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9675301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9756512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9182886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093668676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009058618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546484979","doi":"","title":"(Un)Chained Wives: Understanding the Bruker v. Markovitz Decision, and Possible Alternative Legal Claims for Jewish Women Who Are Denied a Get","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judaism; Law; Wife; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Sociology; Doctrine; Hebrew; State (computer science); Intervention (counseling); Political science; Psychology; Theology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04250719309193344,"score_gpt":0.33053769948494455,"score_spread":0.2880305063930111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2546484979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9734553,0.0049218233,0.0010106275,0.016781086,0.0017442476,0.00067879056,0.000037249196,0.000036993704,0.0013338628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99328583,0.0020784508,0.0016321886,0.00048486487,0.0012408061,0.000045650133,5.12119e-7,0.000028243365,0.0012034234],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971061,0.00022808279,0.00068262964,0.00031742555,0.00094878365,0.00071700476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99581903,0.0018788686,0.000881996,0.0001580827,0.0010113812,0.00025061524],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022312177,0.00033524312,0.00082896324,0.000117324314,0.0035101057,0.0005256699,0.00057051075,0.0001367903,0.000029964305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028494503,0.00020099086,0.00024967344,0.00034664272,0.0014531829,0.0009543857,0.0002929122,0.00068473414,0.0000022079255],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022300468,0.0004254849,0.045936234,0.00019129751,0.0069477987,0.00033016317,0.7284697,0.00011238054,0.0010336356,0.13531601,0.052675992,0.02633124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044911266,0.0006603893,0.031520408,0.000430579,0.0003521009,0.000088581604,0.74759436,0.000100352256,0.00013197721,0.07671114,0.13709947,0.00081950345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047866002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007531832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08442348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061368255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014528565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546903642","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0027","title":"Marriage, Family, and Federal Concerns","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Legislature; Charter; Diversity (politics); Political science; Family law; Corporate governance; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.06425141144140507,"score_gpt":0.27970914010038944,"score_spread":0.21545772865898438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2546903642","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037773425,0.000306676,0.0000053351027,0.00019700323,0.0003202982,0.0004475155,0.00010315865,0.0001172139,0.9981251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004984528,0.0033210258,0.00008697561,0.000054802782,0.000368229,7.8300286e-7,0.00000812966,0.000020426494,0.9911551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987072,0.000056699955,0.000114974144,0.0004068221,0.0003703351,0.00034402314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905145,0.00008510329,0.00025395377,0.0002603164,0.00014350566,0.00020568709],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013582337,0.00029171043,0.000397258,0.00002894337,0.0030062646,0.000234552,0.00055245665,0.000447745,0.000053883687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032378426,0.00029959943,0.0001548853,0.0000019569288,0.0014636965,0.00017857146,0.0005571183,0.00035303688,0.0000023083498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039666356,0.0000037585444,0.000050641174,0.000030600255,0.000195469,0.00009312904,0.0055585704,1.7986684e-7,0.000004179238,0.97756845,0.008879807,0.0075755534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003762411,0.000022279864,0.00018747758,0.00008340798,0.00010170132,4.923422e-7,0.0012456756,0.0000013005932,0.0000021989356,0.0008227463,0.9967856,0.00037089118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065382197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030586263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9879058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028345778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000096054944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547489690","doi":"","title":"\"This is What the Others Have Done\": The Impact of Confederation on the Use of Precedent in Newfoundland Supreme Court Decisions From 1932-1958","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Dominion; Jurisdiction; Dominance (genetics); Political science; Context (archaeology); Common law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.1572676411408118,"score_gpt":0.3686587613018798,"score_spread":0.211391120161068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547489690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96924496,0.00395708,0.0000111539175,0.02530676,0.0003626075,0.00046159653,0.000031005206,0.0000060522616,0.0006188049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827105,0.016223548,0.000059301517,0.00036913576,0.00023941322,0.000009167157,6.7386316e-7,0.000011195867,0.0003770596],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693656,0.0006984914,0.00078576006,0.0001562695,0.0011311072,0.0002917972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935263,0.0044983514,0.0008809817,0.00022628836,0.0008059832,0.000062142004],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012786617,0.00021403593,0.00057872967,0.0000562939,0.0016324294,0.00023982859,0.00051508506,0.00008161197,0.000099829274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024100153,0.00008780776,0.0003934132,0.00019629861,0.001456151,0.000787169,0.0001252362,0.00042934876,0.000005265635],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063418265,0.000405115,0.18324777,0.0000074737304,0.0026118793,0.0000266734,0.74319464,0.002553564,0.0006998787,0.0015395817,0.06250364,0.002575607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022672464,0.0010119325,0.6742917,0.0009865462,0.00035152343,0.000022890796,0.25663382,0.00021170116,0.00065048103,0.0009869919,0.062106762,0.00047843493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10112456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.080135785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4910439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046478506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018954043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547561371","doi":"","title":"\"Scholarship as Activism\" Chapter 29 in The Unbounded Level of the Mind: Rod MacDonald's Legal Imagination","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Scholarship; Tribute; Honour; Sociology; Economic Justice; Legal realism; Legal profession; Political science","score_opus":0.15645726231075113,"score_gpt":0.3817604113735115,"score_spread":0.2253031490627604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547561371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5790266,0.0008810679,0.000011955788,0.024980793,0.00075443194,0.00076451834,0.000013881456,0.000034883247,0.39353192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99021405,0.000024555296,0.000103358776,0.00027892628,0.00038409515,0.000051095052,0.0000029426608,0.000015049702,0.008925942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972422,0.00076765666,0.00033348764,0.00032579826,0.0008816155,0.0004492107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848115,0.00033567142,0.00020052023,0.00032697184,0.00053856685,0.0001170911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022139486,0.00022420782,0.00027015878,0.000056702316,0.00070636696,0.00019584454,0.0009553035,0.0001497802,0.00013088642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016271042,0.0001327889,0.00015947425,0.0005882353,0.0008894056,0.0007189136,0.00019994163,0.00048790916,0.00030723162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012733311,0.0007568875,0.03055824,0.000043475207,0.00015135904,0.000011200564,0.3697217,0.000013694022,0.0014972707,0.5563024,0.0075761443,0.033240292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013057847,0.000076251425,0.17007567,0.00008721874,0.000060273294,0.0000058621913,0.024632907,0.0000373854,0.0024173649,0.012790737,0.7880794,0.00043119316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060068737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028735233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7805032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003738303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028180043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9889878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550870894","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2008.2816","title":"A Review of Lorraine Daston and Peter Galison’s Objectivity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Qualitative Report","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Subjectivity; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.23056065128497955,"score_gpt":0.5547263561167955,"score_spread":0.324165704831816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550870894","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008227781,0.9761299,0.000014640222,0.0014872638,0.00018173539,0.0014260145,0.000056681274,0.00003494223,0.020660589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000029492632,0.9935222,0.00007345482,0.000093941606,0.00025612657,0.00019154181,0.000012265277,0.000021042237,0.0057999264],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930493,0.0045611556,0.0010103415,0.00042261044,0.00063172507,0.00032486624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99439484,0.002975904,0.001717982,0.00038607616,0.00043276616,0.000092436174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009789369,0.0003458705,0.0020115166,0.0000348878,0.00046010627,0.000023248456,0.0002994543,0.00015350277,0.00013861679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077435346,0.00015711585,0.00053122203,0.00030248755,0.0016147722,0.00013916542,0.00018426958,0.0002710125,0.000034120065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008220076,0.00006339534,0.0000070008837,0.12306166,0.00092965603,0.000048229056,0.20579313,2.3435598e-9,5.485781e-7,0.007049758,0.015103197,0.6479352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003942944,0.000028719383,0.00001126462,0.07890892,0.0003780384,0.000028675391,0.004713528,5.611443e-9,1.2841465e-7,0.0003281567,0.9153457,0.00021739809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020305424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002466364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90024257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030908975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033994004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9270294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W255101955","doi":"","title":"Sermon: Grasping the Past, Taking Hold of the Future: The Challenge of Afro-Anglicanism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sermon; Sociology; Law; Theology; History; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.06053509555936397,"score_gpt":0.3445565905599208,"score_spread":0.2840214950005568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W255101955","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10154806,0.48504832,0.000066826666,0.28697515,0.00078122574,0.003325865,0.000010546862,0.00012092478,0.12212307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.920697,0.07531208,0.000033061013,0.0030861723,0.0006426169,0.00003873483,5.333108e-7,0.000007489441,0.00018233129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972827,0.0008706138,0.0005322153,0.0002476953,0.00061181624,0.00045500367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997451,0.0010643009,0.0007177694,0.0004946169,0.00020118032,0.00007112789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039560585,0.00019152072,0.00049488246,0.000009828064,0.0009322032,0.000016363076,0.0013379726,0.00011860403,0.00029043132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014517091,0.00006673978,0.0004403911,0.00064745586,0.0021432987,0.000058154706,0.0003555629,0.0003876164,0.000007461889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013834692,0.00010194221,0.005394284,0.00038005726,0.00012703297,0.0000053066306,0.0142018255,9.510298e-7,0.00009357923,0.89804226,0.002968165,0.07867075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031109265,0.00021512528,0.27201542,0.0019309437,0.00046005583,0.0000060147127,0.027892316,0.0000034996597,0.00018274732,0.02248665,0.67398715,0.0005089714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005622686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010660398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87555563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059065507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032767963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7897073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553314130","doi":"10.4000/eccs.712","title":"La morale à l’épreuve de la mondialisation : le rôle des valeurs morales et familiales dans la distinction idéologique du Canada en Amérique du Nord","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Études canadiennes / Canadian Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037162342470296365,"score_gpt":0.2796458982234736,"score_spread":0.2424835557531772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553314130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.953654,0.004190374,0.00003314681,0.019008648,0.0011376555,0.0005503435,0.0009908485,0.0001113727,0.020323616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829462,0.012571048,0.00022456057,0.00033967808,0.00070728513,0.0002569116,0.00003141268,0.00006898696,0.0028539083],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923961,0.0041934047,0.0005749518,0.00077046844,0.00044777125,0.0016172971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932933,0.00457484,0.00028694756,0.0002984709,0.00049061055,0.0010558316],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023222119,0.00069093134,0.0007682823,0.00016345613,0.002306929,0.00015463066,0.0006329828,0.00065528945,0.000037407142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047777575,0.00058165094,0.00020673084,0.0005734022,0.0055261278,0.00079265825,0.00019906752,0.0005239361,0.000009070641],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028342783,0.000094277166,0.43576,0.00023766403,0.0010519624,0.00096639805,0.20851038,0.00033434914,0.00026132827,0.31358647,0.020077657,0.019091163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005102368,0.000090957095,0.28119433,0.0003188398,0.000177415,0.000082462844,0.41474786,0.000030751664,0.00007885413,0.0012882352,0.30059934,0.000880737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9990219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31229824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013210457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005418207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553331921","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4683","title":"MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE:  RELATIONAL AUTONOMY AND DECISION-MAKING BY ADULTS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Psychology; Volition (linguistics); Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Individualism; Political science","score_opus":0.04227486848726325,"score_gpt":0.3394451055679871,"score_spread":0.2971702370807239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553331921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97656244,0.00032762458,0.00012354294,0.0044192774,0.00012938427,0.0005406325,0.000019603176,0.000041471616,0.017836023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99259996,0.000012889279,0.0063576074,0.00021731644,0.000144776,0.00003988449,0.0000024491565,0.000010393272,0.000614746],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860704,0.0000623299,0.00020575825,0.00023648673,0.00064976234,0.00023864837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986553,0.00079240376,0.000098373814,0.00009515582,0.0002235503,0.00013519955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037349545,0.00013246818,0.00016719014,0.000026243031,0.00053763617,0.0001361508,0.00036820685,0.00006076315,0.00006220577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013898722,0.00008316562,0.000025364634,0.00018946918,0.0006486049,0.00054501125,0.00024549974,0.000105257204,0.000016551588],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008257247,0.00015929158,0.31714287,0.00013873786,0.00022763884,0.0000051943457,0.630873,0.0005311326,0.00003126342,0.008602902,0.02211082,0.01935137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012102774,0.00014178356,0.44534802,0.00069699256,0.00022358463,0.0000032326893,0.4425949,0.00016359975,0.000065422115,0.00091226207,0.10800922,0.00063071604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015713419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011357893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18827815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023886628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021958696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4135117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W255699776","doi":"","title":"THE \"SUPREMACY OF GOD\", HUMAN DIGNITY AND THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Law; Charter; Political science; Human rights; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology","score_opus":0.011160441390085415,"score_gpt":0.27964289022952954,"score_spread":0.2684824488394441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W255699776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98081416,0.009728278,0.000025512867,0.0024839754,0.000076882694,0.00020270394,9.195321e-7,0.000005460433,0.006662127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944987,0.004400463,0.000009034957,0.000013840793,0.00009136579,0.0000029871997,8.245806e-8,0.0000032060168,0.0009803112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826735,0.0004332641,0.0002212503,0.00008368977,0.00027752478,0.00071690447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992866,0.0002842774,0.00019852813,0.00007360492,0.000113913724,0.000043101798],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029889562,0.000082127284,0.0001763733,0.0000120783325,0.0020516315,0.00005095786,0.000177199,0.00004056071,0.000013727521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023629173,0.000036501617,0.000068266934,0.00008089144,0.0016915258,0.00011119443,0.00002827693,0.00052874064,6.6903544e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002243381,0.000017752314,0.0029856768,0.0000028069212,0.00014033749,1.5071636e-7,0.015448436,2.0850767e-7,0.00021035729,0.97997093,0.0000734936,0.0011273945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017180693,0.00014006854,0.008964004,0.000020620371,0.00008489458,0.000018508286,0.03225626,0.0000031413824,0.00029837122,0.9445703,0.011801796,0.0001239767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003899706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021326879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035400663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012483021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015974538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557614419","doi":"10.5209/rpub.53879","title":"Contractarian Libertarianism of Jan Narveson. Is It Still Libertarianism?","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Libertarianism; Social contract; Law and economics; Philosophy; Subject (documents); Morality; Political philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.021814354961587516,"score_gpt":0.3120924097632771,"score_spread":0.2902780548016896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557614419","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.097711414,0.028753659,0.0009907628,0.60426426,0.0076845293,0.0048848973,0.0016965918,0.0009524811,0.2530614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94831115,0.0035716528,0.0018576342,0.0021863787,0.0030571993,0.00010941114,0.000017497749,0.00015269394,0.040736392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908072,0.0016374623,0.0019312421,0.0014039133,0.0018116792,0.0024085096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919613,0.0025599168,0.0014717274,0.0013690058,0.001137365,0.0015006681],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029178392,0.0010171828,0.00184414,0.00028503936,0.0012355903,0.0011289035,0.0020134992,0.0013284953,0.00293044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009810513,0.00078581204,0.00097546674,0.0010245763,0.002072875,0.001251677,0.00047695683,0.0008591544,0.0005466056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002601933,0.0004416987,0.003910982,0.00026185947,0.0007666581,0.000064923566,0.024989543,3.674506e-7,0.0030053614,0.71771914,0.24457371,0.004005544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019054476,0.00028251982,0.006162537,0.0007240874,0.00061419705,0.000017351811,0.0014161533,0.000018224244,0.00024725104,0.005857985,0.98168516,0.0010691137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030228224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019369485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8505997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050111054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021944053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560432532","doi":"","title":"Devolution, Evolution, Confusion: the Constitutional Status of the Canadian Territories and its Potential Implications for the Duty to Consult","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confusion; Devolution (biology); Duty; Law; Political science; Operations research; History; Psychology; Mathematics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02392565925271303,"score_gpt":0.2796583328803652,"score_spread":0.2557326736276522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560432532","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09323459,0.007184437,0.089701176,0.7775282,0.0042030914,0.00785224,0.007170124,0.00014777722,0.012978342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997374,0.00022154047,0.00027601107,0.00041680256,0.0004658687,0.00032279975,0.000013042421,0.000003806191,0.000906146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861765,0.00012523065,0.00029730436,0.00022171345,0.0003219217,0.00041618504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99646133,0.0010697942,0.00015258079,0.00017253154,0.0019367425,0.00020703464],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067964435,0.00011488596,0.00012979428,0.000052323,0.0063943984,0.00007261297,0.0003624984,0.00011560179,0.000048106238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063102436,0.000062780346,0.00009534027,0.00036466523,0.0040248656,0.00018902452,0.00006890826,0.00010076243,0.000009051111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007904924,0.000012584349,0.018320788,0.0000068285212,0.000047754118,1.1115495e-7,0.0012978397,0.00016366458,0.00027939334,0.97729576,0.0022203003,0.00034706344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006759922,0.000012931433,0.58406675,0.000096217555,0.00011050858,0.000028536155,0.001931424,0.0001693939,0.000065652974,0.04085584,0.37177292,0.00021380004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05456127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34045905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93643993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018107134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036121644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561254362","doi":"10.14288/1.0308596","title":"Beyond the new Dawes Act : a critique of the First Nations Property Ownership Act","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Business; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.018473579137904882,"score_gpt":0.22372173051843686,"score_spread":0.20524815138053198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561254362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9271707,0.00015167499,0.000029673502,0.048386265,0.0002069952,0.00058860227,0.00008314415,0.000052428994,0.02333053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833879,0.00032921295,0.000057865098,0.00011451917,0.00007328114,0.0000010926758,6.5614586e-7,0.0000054520287,0.016030012],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888444,0.00016919935,0.00010458105,0.00020261986,0.00040115477,0.00023798428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894786,0.00035083725,0.00014285777,0.0002042493,0.00028575212,0.00006846442],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032352353,0.00004174143,0.00016744107,0.000013651468,0.0021208404,0.000075710224,0.000718796,0.00009233933,0.00021893399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007412589,0.000048678605,0.00017101028,0.00038544528,0.0013784872,0.00040480815,0.0001926698,0.00009817931,0.000011138551],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023193767,0.0002540562,0.163296,0.00012231743,0.00027997693,0.000016034192,0.05316804,0.000002476221,0.0006335319,0.0010263687,0.17196018,0.6092178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036418435,0.000019707453,0.9467808,0.00016678058,0.000036624006,0.0000016733089,0.010946194,0.0000011875344,0.000004362979,0.00074960303,0.04082159,0.00010728285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47814596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.958077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7834848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016431388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023927382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562854184","doi":"10.21991/c9z08p","title":"Daniels v Canada: Supreme Court Ends 150 Years of Political Football","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitution; Parliament; Politics; Plaintiff; Settlement (finance); Interpretation (philosophy); Political question; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.025839907581089023,"score_gpt":0.27802250632928044,"score_spread":0.25218259874819143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562854184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17473131,0.002412419,0.03735114,0.22819215,0.010184097,0.00412203,0.004633823,0.0008063736,0.53756666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99710387,0.00007226071,0.00047747136,0.00079084595,0.00028113555,0.000072561634,0.000024846273,0.000008879744,0.0011681372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962968,0.00013903507,0.00064331153,0.0004707819,0.0011571528,0.0012929254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977321,0.00063989067,0.00020574643,0.00027405532,0.00064503134,0.0005031954],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004182393,0.00028935572,0.00045571194,0.00009812082,0.0014214619,0.000046683675,0.00051929173,0.00023408458,0.0005266652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019163641,0.00023308523,0.00022807662,0.00030871754,0.011798116,0.00054634927,0.00021584454,0.00018772249,0.00008163901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027664863,0.00006624794,0.027421812,0.000009810337,0.0001059433,0.000022158138,0.00016424744,0.000012854658,0.00043871527,0.955366,0.015336382,0.0010281351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019470991,0.00006773214,0.018956752,0.00033805493,0.00009321487,0.00004798132,0.007842029,0.000013822535,0.0008375634,0.016478421,0.9526046,0.000772751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2648181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40988928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9388876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016608007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00589509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563036451","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x16001587","title":"General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Synod; Session (web analytics); Work (physics); Theology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Advertising; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.018217243934284498,"score_gpt":0.2709534100097946,"score_spread":0.25273616607551014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2563036451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90905625,0.0001483589,0.00014768263,0.02063786,0.0006837588,0.00013156558,0.000027226639,0.000009748024,0.069157556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984394,0.000022314567,0.0002625301,0.00012383905,0.00042216698,0.0000011649752,4.7035993e-8,0.0000050053227,0.00072353944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983079,0.00022880246,0.00029610883,0.000088820685,0.00074350706,0.0003348579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989813,0.0003417245,0.00016477918,0.00009355495,0.00023937109,0.00017927411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043229497,0.000080095415,0.00019649096,0.000008024783,0.0008030715,0.000016532702,0.00036462361,0.00005221621,0.00042691594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008781844,0.00003677751,0.000106777894,0.0001190378,0.0009859797,0.000078147714,0.000075262324,0.00014799698,0.0000016272954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049523795,0.000103241,0.017561363,0.00001655242,0.00016305991,0.000025602409,0.0043120347,0.00002089999,0.008032749,0.9476639,0.015822202,0.0062288917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021357166,0.00023045797,0.7332579,0.00053453597,0.00019555449,0.00008227719,0.00966543,0.000035901223,0.0120355375,0.014920504,0.22618216,0.00072402175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33004937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5958394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9327434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026183907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003749548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6744119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565696674","doi":"","title":"Les Droits De La Personne Et Le Litige En Protection De L’Enfance (Human Rights in Child and Youth Protection Litigation)","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Context (archaeology); Jurisprudence; Ethnology; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.012834191706529274,"score_gpt":0.2889128923581455,"score_spread":0.2760787006516162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565696674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9624559,0.0050577517,0.0018945542,0.024802042,0.00013621135,0.00056242413,0.000006048876,0.000045517176,0.0050394954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99246246,0.0029928915,0.000068137524,0.000025281242,0.0007851133,0.0000530604,8.9120084e-7,0.000015823887,0.0035963538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571294,0.0016838171,0.00028668228,0.00028498072,0.0002983629,0.0017332325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939865,0.000080993595,0.00023175622,0.000064251675,0.00009608578,0.00012825726],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039314833,0.00021343384,0.0002155945,0.000078279205,0.0022508637,0.0001442298,0.0001561258,0.00030015738,0.000024074863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026294388,0.00016165577,0.00009723151,0.00025556647,0.0005500842,0.0007659585,0.00003316043,0.0018787275,0.000008420198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038366474,0.00013224392,0.0022463922,0.000024620693,0.00009911013,0.0000032877776,0.07133686,0.000011346226,0.0014401971,0.8985486,0.000004020993,0.02611495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045454307,0.0011206765,0.14025868,0.0020929493,0.00014263525,0.0010289367,0.090606995,0.000107074186,0.0017704329,0.7387065,0.018545635,0.0010740433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07805735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08472853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15984209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048021004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060498796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565975243","doi":"","title":"Le Juge Charles Doherty Gonthier et la Tradition Classique du Droit Naturel: Correspondances (TR. Justice Gonthier and the Classical Natural Law Tradition: Some Points of Correspondence)","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Natural law; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.011471558125676401,"score_gpt":0.26896109705143223,"score_spread":0.2574895389257558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565975243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50885296,0.26028654,0.00042477078,0.20126995,0.010199717,0.0010901632,0.00010471507,0.00010768718,0.017663496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94989717,0.03715438,0.00008698505,0.0014696973,0.0033854381,0.000030757332,0.000010998908,0.000040408537,0.007924152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99157244,0.003627643,0.00076851645,0.00041131506,0.0010900566,0.0025300176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961525,0.0022694534,0.00077351276,0.00018681335,0.00029891598,0.00031878112],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007221897,0.0004970795,0.0007742362,0.000080276994,0.0024134014,0.00026580476,0.00061231595,0.00060449174,0.00006973309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007963433,0.00034627665,0.00046835816,0.0004497424,0.0059868814,0.0027887505,0.000090273315,0.0058119893,0.000030318564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008790207,0.00030877138,0.0001253143,0.0000499589,0.00038881414,0.000006980229,0.016826972,0.00000484787,0.00014063266,0.97490525,0.0016375734,0.0047258716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0075831143,0.0006682564,0.018659338,0.0006086313,0.0015212889,0.0015178336,0.092493534,0.00047876927,0.0001859114,0.64404607,0.23093124,0.001306022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001810062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007573514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4410442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014321421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002120267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566452130","doi":"10.21991/c9g09q","title":"Trinity Western Law School: \"To Be or Not to Be -- That Is the Question\"","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Law; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Nova scotia; Balance (ability); Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.08022226476180438,"score_gpt":0.35196583245039137,"score_spread":0.271743567688587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566452130","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026437294,0.00022486762,0.02720935,0.8779414,0.0035894306,0.0028531179,0.0014348689,0.0005760507,0.059733607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92504776,0.00011372938,0.00075269863,0.06530593,0.00045937355,0.00031898817,0.000016543647,0.00001363376,0.007971362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955216,0.0003515436,0.0006105534,0.00080183113,0.001410202,0.001304237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659306,0.0010554501,0.00019358587,0.0005239056,0.0007294973,0.00090447615],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013361805,0.0004810247,0.00048234937,0.00013206854,0.0071007255,0.0003607736,0.0009678417,0.00028683888,0.0011512865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036873526,0.00027157582,0.00031232223,0.00063748093,0.009852506,0.0011775558,0.0005419137,0.0003153783,0.001646272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020142212,0.000073768075,0.009947048,0.0000068889167,0.00011599865,0.0000126918385,0.0018249345,0.000027867456,0.00019534456,0.93931895,0.04744153,0.0008335394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010113757,0.00007940058,0.003506254,0.00020347472,0.00007778177,0.00003032594,0.008609201,0.0000028934226,0.0007598234,0.0033688035,0.9817343,0.0006163738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004913447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034537077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93595016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011252146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016552379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566974742","doi":"","title":"The Obsolete Theory of Crown Unity in Canada and Its Relevance to Indigenous Claims","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Natural resource; Independence (probability theory); Supreme court; Law; Natural (archaeology); Political science; Constitution; Sociology; History; Archaeology; Ecology","score_opus":0.029949603338706117,"score_gpt":0.2755112166048056,"score_spread":0.2455616132660995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566974742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888996,0.0023776297,0.000001278236,0.0016930612,0.00028500688,0.00038285644,0.000014210352,0.000017792338,0.0063285683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973016,0.00025637116,0.000053981472,0.00049754744,0.00009218086,0.000024157946,6.61748e-7,0.0000067878796,0.0017667467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983242,0.00040702228,0.00022186662,0.0001813865,0.00045698017,0.00040852226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987415,0.0005267401,0.00008648249,0.00014824343,0.00020291725,0.00029408617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011812177,0.00011095083,0.00019303868,0.000011401169,0.000759413,0.00005473422,0.00033692946,0.000057841557,0.000016500271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016342561,0.00007660586,0.000022935032,0.00026715387,0.00025858526,0.00016090847,0.0001238149,0.00022474185,0.000018158544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005166133,0.00013274181,0.20381634,0.00009853948,0.00020486487,0.00007404437,0.31123555,0.00043966254,0.00083865353,0.44689968,0.012927234,0.022816082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011340898,0.0001574083,0.2609553,0.00014399858,0.00003158044,0.0000017455375,0.11166267,0.000012164066,0.0013114755,0.019863805,0.6039934,0.000732362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9729811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5910662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078781415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008300837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5840868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567411418","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1324","title":"The Past and Future of Constitutional Law and Social Justice: Majestic or Substantive Equality?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Retrenchment; Constitutional law; Law; Political science; Charter; Equal Protection Clause; Substantive law; Economic Justice; Inequality; Law and economics; Constitutional right; Sociology; Constitution; Public administration","score_opus":0.08895260459985463,"score_gpt":0.37339594091850237,"score_spread":0.2844433363186477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567411418","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065455884,0.6480243,0.000049637325,0.14869912,0.0017619678,0.002694865,0.00022331346,0.00012731196,0.1918739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8520991,0.14238052,0.00025286063,0.0033114583,0.001342565,0.000047193887,0.000011062974,0.000009374277,0.000545851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984036,0.00039828074,0.00028824832,0.00017972161,0.00048340802,0.0002467115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988222,0.00038282815,0.00015391957,0.00008173395,0.00044932144,0.000109996],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013636296,0.0001335462,0.0003548444,0.0000043573777,0.001563442,0.00006670912,0.00015240035,0.00007540535,0.00004252419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028362413,0.00007496805,0.00005618811,0.00012956276,0.0048215464,0.0001819743,0.00008911289,0.00013003059,0.0000083637915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001649302,0.000012493864,0.00017409491,0.000612348,0.000039357357,0.0000018421271,0.0033908484,2.7904312e-8,0.000001944709,0.98902917,0.005812756,0.0009086121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023552602,0.000023822406,0.0003925734,0.00028971554,0.00024171348,0.0000029504636,0.0062032593,6.22234e-7,0.0000010422206,0.0019412205,0.9905454,0.00012219131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011319113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051122783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98708797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007833223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013865714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W257036210","doi":"","title":"Justice Bastarache, the Charter and Judging: Principled Pragmatism and the Centrality of Equality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Economic Justice; Political science; Centrality; Pragmatism; Human rights; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05154791915603733,"score_gpt":0.3148542736741043,"score_spread":0.26330635451806694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W257036210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97611535,0.0047109453,0.0004205099,0.012977876,0.00015983221,0.0004191789,0.0000024756919,0.00001758007,0.005176265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931305,0.0060106767,0.000059847578,0.00013718767,0.00013913133,0.000005984288,1.8679938e-7,0.00000461509,0.0005118784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740887,0.00084584334,0.0002669243,0.00012601374,0.00032961054,0.0010227367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991625,0.00029166884,0.00026005323,0.00010289873,0.00011467745,0.00006823206],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068502966,0.00010579596,0.00019423592,0.000010957344,0.0013935181,0.000058564707,0.00024486645,0.000052827516,0.00003261882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005152761,0.000050517523,0.00006446243,0.0000921571,0.0010870693,0.00019750754,0.000081298705,0.00082682515,0.0000016785665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000865823,0.00003081394,0.010054979,0.000015879717,0.00016804313,3.3962039e-7,0.1108816,2.157621e-7,0.000027980777,0.8739815,0.000024788791,0.0047273226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032268793,0.00016903722,0.3941669,0.000050261304,0.0006857339,0.000063605585,0.2598442,0.00010413175,0.000090967886,0.3337465,0.007470172,0.00038160034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00530235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009453686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.540235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020444143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029865716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2570652814","doi":"","title":"Importing U.S. Establishment Clause Principles in Canada: Changing the Debate on Funding for Faith-based Schools in Ontario","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Faith; Political science; Establishment Clause; Public administration; Law; First amendment; Theology; Supreme court; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0469617219585506,"score_gpt":0.28494463036827067,"score_spread":0.23798290840972008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2570652814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9803098,0.00038842557,0.0000037080038,0.0012408857,0.0004165209,0.0009401246,0.000009142437,0.000016495878,0.016674908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99004656,0.000071551716,0.0002423638,0.000025749941,0.000048566708,0.000007000212,0.000059343878,0.000011199672,0.0094876485],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983821,0.00010676247,0.00018320861,0.00025842048,0.00045768303,0.0006118515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989949,0.00020502438,0.00046443814,0.00013282584,0.00010579351,0.00009703538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007656556,0.0001955174,0.00036304377,0.000065329325,0.00081408327,0.000030511837,0.0003826969,0.00015290863,0.00055888563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001683984,0.00018839848,0.00010535571,0.00011780249,0.000049923598,0.00038067834,0.000051088464,0.00031676804,0.0000011900835],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041287273,0.00010601381,0.2707918,0.00021461668,0.00013959568,0.00002031659,0.71280557,0.0004795069,0.00012412023,0.0020877058,0.00032467154,0.012493224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031636452,0.000015000816,0.5984576,0.00022352148,0.000031906988,1.735978e-8,0.39694595,0.000051573537,0.000012585395,0.0000022940787,0.0037817701,0.00016144864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32766575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01443141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019979416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.989352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2571774476","doi":"","title":"Marriage and Advance Consent to Sex: A Feminist Judgment in R v JA","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Supreme court; Harm; Tribunal; Law; Sexual violence; Political science; Human sexuality; Context (archaeology); Sexual assault; Criminal code; Sociology; Criminal law; Criminology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; History","score_opus":0.017616404578270756,"score_gpt":0.30972588648256766,"score_spread":0.2921094819042969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2571774476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95295113,0.0033106552,0.000332013,0.031717133,0.00024573022,0.000378067,0.0000040076197,0.000032419917,0.011028845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808553,0.0082458155,0.00010998458,0.00028271475,0.00022271622,0.000014712157,9.129425e-8,0.0000072948433,0.010261381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750495,0.00016221688,0.00020747137,0.00019002668,0.00030201284,0.0016333081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994691,0.00018703258,0.00007943999,0.000063404805,0.00004300417,0.00015800478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001562892,0.00011369517,0.00016966146,0.000041160747,0.0005254902,0.000056899753,0.00017052922,0.000050213846,0.000039807986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040977285,0.000072984396,0.000042372452,0.00013222084,0.00018696436,0.00012831087,0.000061655315,0.00040303715,0.00003432303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002248265,0.00019399713,0.12040295,0.00001555348,0.00022842201,0.000043236792,0.057865478,0.0000057827615,0.004295093,0.46706933,0.0016654598,0.34798986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041912864,0.0010662857,0.027897527,0.00038408762,0.000049086862,0.00013334303,0.17457859,0.000002710362,0.0004037558,0.16211846,0.6281261,0.0010487669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012046036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050239865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6264606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020977694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006763023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9670908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572439900","doi":"","title":"Take My Breath Away: Competing Contexts between Domestic Violence, Kink and the Criminal Justice System in R. v. J.A.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; Humanities; Criminal justice; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.015917369482831633,"score_gpt":0.29373647553728205,"score_spread":0.2778191060544504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572439900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98328274,0.00782038,0.0006912038,0.004745531,0.00027036585,0.00038710382,0.0000043105683,0.000056008077,0.002742341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920828,0.006502486,0.000033382315,0.000056703793,0.0008797476,0.000013235138,3.38474e-7,0.000011988998,0.00041936533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961242,0.0007597336,0.00040661308,0.00023806229,0.0005003172,0.0019710446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980561,0.0012997432,0.0002650139,0.00009768899,0.00015254618,0.0001289078],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050313426,0.00019049022,0.00038303714,0.000056831326,0.0016185947,0.00013303595,0.0003872519,0.00009956878,0.000009211934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081581436,0.00009619682,0.00009770744,0.00020427836,0.0008256437,0.00025158556,0.00007878536,0.000979806,0.000021915248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017001836,0.000029030874,0.041449994,0.0000682139,0.000224383,0.000023989816,0.027445972,0.000003554565,0.00006094578,0.8043009,0.000026981725,0.12619604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014133939,0.00043178743,0.15176532,0.0032006868,0.001967412,0.00059994526,0.75736684,0.000051598203,0.000023707871,0.063401096,0.005876061,0.0011816204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028941198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007196286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7408998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018195212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006853101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W257610069","doi":"10.1353/srm.2012.0023","title":"The Suffering Traveller and the Romantic Imagination by Carl Thompson","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Romanticism","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Historicism; Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Literature; Romance; Sacrifice; New Historicism; Epistemology; Art; History; Theology","score_opus":0.038956708188592835,"score_gpt":0.3569701338179007,"score_spread":0.3180134256293079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W257610069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8566665,0.09056586,0.000017471088,0.031128408,0.0017588356,0.0008186833,0.00000211322,0.000066175715,0.018975979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848583,0.013102727,0.000047384496,0.00011792449,0.00028047053,0.00007251168,4.7247815e-7,0.000008798706,0.0015114348],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828357,0.0003929734,0.00023225628,0.00016516475,0.00037068373,0.00055534235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843574,0.0012267726,0.00008647763,0.00012155573,0.00008249017,0.000046980367],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019247418,0.00015273452,0.00025364035,0.000018610579,0.0025046822,0.00009299057,0.00022020155,0.00004967715,0.000005845729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009819212,0.00007580418,0.000054809287,0.0001922395,0.0025470995,0.00024609332,0.00019836825,0.0001851521,0.000011393051],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049689505,0.00007223854,0.04092795,0.00005113677,0.0003361198,0.000003073475,0.7926894,0.000002018413,0.00016290841,0.14142942,0.01279116,0.01148492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002438606,0.000035193796,0.27253336,0.00013532925,0.0001827478,0.00000390087,0.569893,0.00017353185,0.00015042575,0.0053844773,0.14847109,0.0005983101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002159373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016498916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23160541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013934943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008698332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581140645","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1431","title":"Incorporating Common Law into the Constitution of Canada: Egale v. Canada and the Status of Marriage","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Legislation; Common law; Political science; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Section (typography); Sociology; Business; Medicine","score_opus":0.014577740120674223,"score_gpt":0.25011281302574945,"score_spread":0.23553507290507522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581140645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22223288,0.0027594008,0.000019157913,0.0050381236,0.00059614226,0.0003302538,0.000023832152,0.0000060482535,0.76899415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991711,0.00018546778,0.00022272204,0.0002554875,0.00006044346,0.0000029349637,5.66555e-7,0.000003030901,0.000098288045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811476,0.0006045928,0.00032873708,0.000077867655,0.0005575995,0.00031644464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876267,0.00041571198,0.0003849838,0.00008583266,0.00021069402,0.00014008608],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010696914,0.000091465066,0.00022581907,0.0000050321655,0.0027127615,0.000054737695,0.00017551154,0.000037155507,0.000028545133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004168393,0.000048723956,0.00003834364,0.00009261732,0.0019174493,0.00012251757,0.000039687853,0.00025610073,8.753712e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001450169,0.000006351475,0.0044096694,0.000008222403,0.000046863486,0.0000056121075,0.0050730337,0.000064431966,0.00005876448,0.98966163,0.00044843144,0.00020251013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0073945974,0.00016594467,0.02174481,0.00045907404,0.00044786534,0.0001267179,0.3240973,0.00016484164,0.006123831,0.31175616,0.32643238,0.0010864874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99996036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7769382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053520733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016938368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581409875","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2905135","title":"Renewing Human Rights Law in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.020678311966874977,"score_gpt":0.3033609520590239,"score_spread":0.28268264009214894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581409875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9303724,0.00070092396,0.0000046595555,0.004577093,0.00036698006,0.00009930813,9.080284e-7,0.0000108684235,0.06386686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99645686,0.00028005202,0.000012239235,0.000059077724,0.0004855515,0.000002737244,4.4092465e-7,0.000005707958,0.0026973384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714607,0.00012373392,0.00019381271,0.00013729883,0.00041446855,0.0019846156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994819,0.000034794102,0.00018486039,0.00013384775,0.000066977685,0.0000976043],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012483711,0.00010156942,0.00016629815,0.00001761135,0.0073334305,0.00020134647,0.000588067,0.000048630052,0.000038447382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009403303,0.0000805043,0.000054095646,0.00004327978,0.00019235844,0.0003829636,0.000055095083,0.0010391242,0.000006663809],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005960553,0.000015603064,0.036212083,0.0000016478243,0.000070653194,0.000023577184,0.003246946,0.0000081358285,0.00006516645,0.9581748,0.00035951514,0.0018158759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015097996,0.00008623735,0.074621215,0.000096816686,0.000040342453,0.000026676393,0.041649964,0.000008105392,0.00013393996,0.6840485,0.1971011,0.00067734893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.998768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27412638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0080912905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029605008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99571645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2582391383","doi":"","title":"After Tsilhqot'In Nation: The Aboriginal Title Question in Canada's Maritime Provinces","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Sovereignty; Assertion; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.005771348012416678,"score_gpt":0.26597423562705863,"score_spread":0.26020288761464194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2582391383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82174665,0.0088709295,0.00012068821,0.09618994,0.001181225,0.00048928196,0.000006084335,0.000031876774,0.07136333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99219245,0.0019801653,0.000008913345,0.000052495514,0.00028477047,0.000009429503,1.3959767e-7,0.0000027786189,0.0054688505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888337,0.00012253699,0.00009806458,0.000065822955,0.0002294503,0.00060077826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998188,0.000052417967,0.000038643688,0.000028997496,0.000039166243,0.00002197416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008215996,0.00004579293,0.000055609788,0.000018094508,0.0001462782,0.000023243121,0.000116084535,0.000024948858,0.00019036462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007130562,0.000023980168,0.000017133178,0.00009496265,0.000056522822,0.000111230234,0.000007050159,0.00029826217,0.00003573443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056188735,0.00003870583,0.20477323,0.0000047459675,0.000047794965,0.000021506208,0.003743706,0.0000054047678,0.00003829061,0.65248024,0.0027910937,0.13599911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007776862,0.000062013,0.25181085,0.00012820329,0.000015256876,0.000020188983,0.01191663,0.000015186107,0.000019028686,0.0999641,0.6349508,0.00032005145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7560931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99765307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6321597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004392304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003973805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2582707181","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rww080","title":"The Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society v Trinity Western University","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Nova scotia; Ultra vires; Constitution; Political science; Charter; Statutory law; Human rights; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Sociology; Doctrine","score_opus":0.026604408836613073,"score_gpt":0.2836527271664773,"score_spread":0.25704831832986424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2582707181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9487819,0.0011481175,0.00018607995,0.025793547,0.0007556005,0.00010707777,0.000002911705,0.000013020933,0.023211762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981544,0.016133875,0.00007272097,0.00019398019,0.00023003624,3.8794084e-8,5.7189297e-8,0.0000026791386,0.0018226075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992533,0.000116581956,0.0001504554,0.00006877756,0.00024080063,0.00017008877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992704,0.00022734444,0.00018891157,0.000049009992,0.0001626082,0.0001017452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058913894,0.00006575021,0.0001228535,0.0000070525907,0.0010384114,0.00005343336,0.00016476578,0.00006807548,0.0000065040035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051581417,0.000029841487,0.00014029708,0.00005346584,0.000608356,0.00024051055,0.00005158205,0.00010939885,0.0000033652134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012826918,0.0002530532,0.29076657,0.00008225718,0.0012885577,0.0001316326,0.11068749,0.0000037953241,0.0045529893,0.4391459,0.09576894,0.056036137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006286192,0.00007513149,0.010992794,0.000065700726,0.00003459592,0.000007395656,0.0028077087,1.9922525e-7,0.00007489921,0.0007854877,0.9844501,0.00007735053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020267018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005513714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8886812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012130692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000406939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79867256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585978807","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3029","title":"Book Review: Law’s Religion: Religious Difference and the Claims of Constitutionalism by Benjamin L. Berger","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutionalism; Sociology; Legal culture; Argument (complex analysis); Scholarship; Proposition; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.012506722010714118,"score_gpt":0.2735562152988521,"score_spread":0.261049493288138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585978807","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007715952,0.6371504,0.000099179146,0.15117387,0.0005055506,0.00049474696,0.000039705956,0.000039382758,0.20972559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5898464,0.39669675,0.00008261524,0.009760589,0.00025051087,0.000015536103,0.0000011685663,0.0000067818783,0.0033396885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979431,0.000437034,0.0004566336,0.00019149762,0.00064809073,0.00032364464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985056,0.00053829176,0.00034300727,0.00014476353,0.0003026869,0.00016567527],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010366061,0.00016251013,0.00038187625,0.000009829343,0.0016668378,0.00007406147,0.00032495378,0.00010194938,0.00024298299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031098563,0.0000751623,0.0001573864,0.000073483796,0.0038083536,0.00024368388,0.00009206376,0.0002370815,0.00002024741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020519752,0.000016144377,0.00008063321,0.000019972082,0.000045297726,0.000003993991,0.00087957666,8.96172e-8,0.00012957038,0.66989684,0.32846102,0.00044636775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011231324,0.000028734765,0.00012211593,0.0009816875,0.00008754518,0.000043252465,0.0002049504,4.640532e-7,0.00010990782,0.046321165,0.9507998,0.00017720058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03202957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016923634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6235756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011506163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058056936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586340792","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006330","title":"‘Obligations’, Decolonization and Indigenous Rights to Governance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Obligation; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Geography","score_opus":0.01290009913857267,"score_gpt":0.2809436500038997,"score_spread":0.26804355086532705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586340792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829615,0.0008767335,0.00029998572,0.006499191,0.0005174071,0.00019927711,0.000007364924,0.0000097575,0.008628817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974589,0.00007375295,0.0010716168,0.0006860487,0.000310764,0.0000027291997,3.2391293e-7,0.000005021997,0.00039087966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989312,0.000115211675,0.00023099259,0.00011338175,0.00029593403,0.00031324135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852866,0.00012244264,0.0001869204,0.0000718625,0.00038750368,0.00070260395],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054913136,0.00008453623,0.00015658364,0.000040462193,0.001450399,0.0001719141,0.000280124,0.000068382695,0.000051846513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056559313,0.00007313228,0.000034977405,0.00022583304,0.00032008038,0.0003839047,0.000013183348,0.00012905062,0.00002526186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013418534,0.000024916195,0.06281273,0.000022838345,0.00006710448,0.00007689094,0.22927162,0.0002090734,0.00013072704,0.6890883,0.007268767,0.011013607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022339934,0.00013909489,0.16107914,0.00013703098,0.000029301043,0.000017020126,0.0009594936,0.000007932498,0.00020413393,0.00816615,0.82878864,0.00024863088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19287767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.772002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8215199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039977636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041344177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586772489","doi":"10.1017/s0021223716000327","title":"Limits on Constitutional Rights: The Marginal Role of Proportionality Analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Dignity; Law and economics; Political science; Proportionality (law); Autonomy; Social rights; Fundamental rights; Law; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.0624862405199772,"score_gpt":0.3794631902142362,"score_spread":0.316976949694259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586772489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019927902,0.07000636,0.000019354013,0.050467182,0.00031437544,0.0016247934,0.000119560566,0.00006193556,0.85745853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919855,0.0063697947,0.00008974764,0.00080551085,0.00014597955,0.00004508053,0.000008461752,0.0000016476342,0.0005482564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985061,0.00022976026,0.00028809038,0.00018631537,0.00061358744,0.00017611113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987907,0.00012941318,0.0003949831,0.00034713282,0.0002780374,0.000059729424],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010774514,0.00010307037,0.00035620594,0.000009469489,0.002878368,0.00006683693,0.00048371186,0.00004403038,0.00033066582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039662208,0.000054519925,0.00029991593,0.00014754194,0.0032890993,0.00017039815,0.000052999065,0.000108278175,0.000082285784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031727968,0.000040166728,0.0058503016,0.00006880784,0.00026040865,9.117495e-7,0.00014921797,0.0000014485316,0.000002615309,0.9922047,0.0005908591,0.00082736195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069627415,0.0000107304795,0.046167832,0.0003820937,0.00061059394,3.4241341e-7,0.00011015384,0.0000022424636,0.000021532825,0.0040733796,0.9484492,0.000102280406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016645206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009017662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98813134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008107271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065984525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587847431","doi":"","title":"Case Comment: Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Immigration; Political science; Law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.03481040752724373,"score_gpt":0.28298610950324254,"score_spread":0.2481757019759988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587847431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97362155,0.00029615173,0.0000013143708,0.0021533833,0.00006870324,0.00012879905,0.0000039983315,0.0000123565205,0.023713753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822753,0.00025801678,0.000066975204,0.0000133307185,0.0000881347,3.3999058e-7,0.0000020887226,0.0000035824573,0.01729223],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983975,0.000564361,0.00010005708,0.0001783717,0.0005128595,0.0002468312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893075,0.0004606437,0.00006160575,0.000080049205,0.00029718335,0.00016976731],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005872881,0.00006890474,0.00016223408,0.00003730006,0.0023971584,0.000041021307,0.000107899206,0.00007280015,0.00024313583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011182717,0.00007357065,0.000027107473,0.00017602027,0.00078333967,0.000118377364,0.00006669,0.00031595043,0.0000021298474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00092021713,0.0002544601,0.39250463,0.00055908324,0.0007396546,0.0038390995,0.49712148,0.000055613444,0.0032342335,0.0046528177,0.07210445,0.024014235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010269138,0.00043549523,0.071029164,0.00010679858,0.000043728614,0.000069908005,0.24769358,0.000116134244,0.00015687743,0.00012058943,0.67890626,0.000294563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6485427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29011735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6068018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015090994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016543106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588286494","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4816","title":"DRIVING THE GIFT HOME","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Narrative; Constitutionalism; Section (typography); Treaty; Politics; Sociology; Colonialism; History; Law; Political science; Literature; Art; Democracy","score_opus":0.06954741630039481,"score_gpt":0.3789582868100378,"score_spread":0.309410870509643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588286494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7587552,0.00020328884,0.000054144577,0.029223684,0.001213706,0.0006664154,0.0000071343784,0.00008079452,0.20979564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99406403,0.00007695139,0.00025475738,0.00035257518,0.0008777466,0.000023155626,3.0023918e-7,0.000011377347,0.0043391017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863017,0.00009172263,0.00019001948,0.00021263243,0.00051854615,0.00035690368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869746,0.00029070003,0.00022851782,0.00045512928,0.00019638544,0.00013178233],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000591977,0.00011817231,0.00020185031,0.000027929133,0.002640997,0.0005897478,0.0019472378,0.000073403695,0.00021286432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021395695,0.00008031212,0.00008137159,0.00009595286,0.0006392874,0.00068270246,0.0006147394,0.00015364382,0.00014187228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018622882,0.00039750396,0.45201465,0.0005347842,0.0006889222,0.00004958577,0.27358645,0.0003817434,0.0041307146,0.09713321,0.121954,0.04894219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021220781,0.000026486272,0.85220885,0.00008061633,0.00016126952,2.5727275e-7,0.008072275,0.000015390791,0.00030688127,0.00037333442,0.13830554,0.00023689409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069085136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002909724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4001942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071346614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061965955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589003308","doi":"10.7202/1038493ar","title":"Toward a Bijural Interpretation of the Principle of Respect in Aboriginal Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitution; Flourishing; Politics; Political science; Supreme court; Colonialism; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0343078951375821,"score_gpt":0.34587883658361923,"score_spread":0.31157094144603714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589003308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8633728,0.00012684271,0.000024177905,0.0050581032,0.0005523072,0.00020878768,0.000024832596,0.000013143643,0.13061899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999446,0.000081805694,0.00018584017,0.00004758625,0.00008732271,0.000002753851,6.229236e-8,0.000003898463,0.00014475254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871206,0.00026802043,0.00031881925,0.00008448915,0.00041922685,0.00019738237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928707,0.00012991639,0.0002556361,0.000072876115,0.00020621423,0.000048263897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064916426,0.00006997732,0.00016799427,0.00002098235,0.00082953647,0.00001626802,0.00027384696,0.000047158563,0.000078092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021847933,0.000033680455,0.0001133186,0.00016042974,0.00056684564,0.0002883126,0.000043391836,0.0001335279,0.000003988117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007803307,0.000041978357,0.006838776,0.000009913508,0.00003137962,0.000003475177,0.008059154,0.0000102210615,0.0015453282,0.98112935,0.000025359057,0.0022270493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018127832,0.00019358732,0.067673765,0.0007986401,0.0000461437,0.00001689697,0.005345883,0.000021985026,0.015222424,0.010728124,0.8978511,0.00028865653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009872903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.066491134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9704012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026586745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019911939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99672043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589773886","doi":"","title":"The Philosophy of Law in Canada’s North","year":2016,"lang":"fi","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lauda (University of Lapland)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.026989274802429044,"score_gpt":0.21098793512976952,"score_spread":0.18399866032734047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589773886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034187775,0.0008655457,0.0000016586041,0.011799119,0.0004463027,0.00042091712,0.0006703028,0.000012188598,0.9515962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9252384,0.0032614474,0.000023495222,0.000068293906,0.000119735654,1.633697e-7,0.000010637584,0.00001062202,0.071267255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826354,0.00009752947,0.0002607876,0.00029496706,0.00070934126,0.00037385582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840504,0.00047205156,0.00054400536,0.00023620552,0.00022080677,0.00012189485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020216467,0.00025226155,0.00059977785,0.000036991885,0.0010539566,0.000009530238,0.00079473155,0.00020263804,0.0004559603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026248908,0.00018863614,0.0001941954,0.0000715544,0.0016830978,0.00015762438,0.00026083057,0.00028439442,0.000030659638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016402213,0.00002187778,0.013867731,0.000103400555,0.00033445732,0.0000750962,0.014765667,0.0000040840714,0.0000052044097,0.9663067,0.0013006944,0.003051097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000997942,0.000081436694,0.02975566,0.000530404,0.00013680018,7.901039e-7,0.009504322,0.0000039381803,0.0000034466143,0.0076215314,0.9508712,0.00049252575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9789565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99948287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95868516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006937541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006100042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81062883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590791466","doi":"10.3138/chr.98.1.borrows","title":"Challenging Historical Frameworks: Aboriginal Rights, The Trickster, and Originalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Historical Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Treaty; Indigenous; Sovereignty; Constitution; Political science; Indigenous rights; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.046005310275345976,"score_gpt":0.339512218896094,"score_spread":0.293506908620748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590791466","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005378199,0.6490948,0.000042954714,0.31179497,0.0029132413,0.0007325474,0.000005186607,0.000065159984,0.034813326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20555083,0.7275799,0.0006994245,0.0076409634,0.0034761848,0.00026069398,0.0000038738726,0.00004721583,0.054740913],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798894,0.00021588811,0.0003070803,0.0003699184,0.00046369823,0.00065445795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998013,0.00022965974,0.00021308915,0.0004977706,0.00016317995,0.00088328694],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008558562,0.00021892792,0.000499655,0.00003194186,0.0065134964,0.00019392357,0.00082236057,0.00024371092,0.00019857784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012129658,0.00014257609,0.00015760797,0.00016968058,0.00025727652,0.00026159166,0.00004103334,0.00070364046,0.00007754517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005305405,0.00003470859,0.0018718591,0.00047848397,0.00008159155,0.00016587149,0.007992099,1.4303747e-7,4.574e-7,0.11703459,0.75470275,0.117632136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000809958,0.000013383766,0.0008251541,0.0004163968,0.000080451704,0.0000032315625,0.000049048922,0.0000019125061,4.8348348e-8,0.0005900952,0.9977178,0.00022148619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8033496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43195525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3713944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019479254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002841318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591075658","doi":"","title":"Le droit à L'égalité sous la loupe de la théorie critique du handicap (The Right to Equality and Critical Disability Theory)","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Humanities; Sociology; Derecho; Charter; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0075903022100756255,"score_gpt":0.3062160738520147,"score_spread":0.2986257716419391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591075658","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44983077,0.013717674,0.020489115,0.503641,0.0006173097,0.000433262,0.000035146324,0.000071644565,0.011164067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845099,0.010153867,0.00008000843,0.0005035696,0.0013951983,0.000028545104,3.5785118e-7,0.000025005731,0.0033035404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98925066,0.0060606785,0.00049778953,0.0004509254,0.00059996854,0.003140002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929021,0.006039613,0.00013037717,0.00022794864,0.0002212033,0.000478775],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016675888,0.0003181968,0.00043004152,0.000020478992,0.0027227236,0.000336598,0.0005853498,0.0003458012,0.00025792216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061796154,0.00018914987,0.00026984484,0.00025791008,0.007225426,0.00048529392,0.00020071444,0.0019007202,0.00004955364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008453442,0.000244486,0.0051717954,0.000021519141,0.000172725,0.000009819581,0.0063610165,7.274927e-7,0.00015115518,0.9686578,0.00032169803,0.018802755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005600336,0.00025171245,0.006559873,0.00009506261,0.00012385828,0.00019488823,0.011991952,0.0000035638745,0.00010051838,0.9413805,0.038414918,0.0003231451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059865345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012635919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5346791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027041507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020925086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592762408","doi":"10.1108/s2398-601820170000001012","title":"The ‘Ethics Rupture’ and the New Brunswick Declaration","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Summit; Declaration; Opposition (politics); Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Geography; Philosophy; Cartography","score_opus":0.08402650501663772,"score_gpt":0.3401808586301885,"score_spread":0.25615435361355077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592762408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000006638458,0.0062438445,0.00002651196,0.15255442,0.00047629816,0.00050598354,0.0000010585737,0.000044128064,0.8401411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024222967,0.01855125,0.000079643214,0.0009472886,0.0012200208,0.0000041524936,0.0000021449987,0.000012353152,0.97676086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865174,0.00013133985,0.00018579849,0.00021545385,0.0005891261,0.00022651722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977778,0.0013997821,0.00026109803,0.00028359354,0.00018814708,0.00008955883],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015198424,0.00019690713,0.0002354437,0.0000073735278,0.008130604,0.0007114504,0.00050434313,0.00051332597,0.00013756554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001261829,0.00008258938,0.00012843082,0.000007204153,0.0027901232,0.0001282567,0.0001652038,0.0007899802,0.00010097156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000100746465,6.4328856e-7,0.000008764535,0.0000027579908,0.00005725453,4.4290536e-7,0.020650018,8.8683045e-8,1.4580777e-7,0.94858056,0.024764033,0.0059252433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019855447,0.00000559569,0.0001812178,0.000023659459,0.00005355379,3.4730277e-7,0.001215578,0.0000019290515,5.510921e-7,0.101645425,0.89654416,0.00012943686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044195853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37417728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8717801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000090791815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005441135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593509048","doi":"","title":"Laws of Desire: The Political Morality of Public Sex","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Mores; Morality; Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Human sexuality; Constitution; Sociology; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.046950757674692,"score_gpt":0.3369622127062817,"score_spread":0.2900114550315897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593509048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8807397,0.0034113827,0.00050269515,0.09255459,0.00013975204,0.00025844824,0.0000035861108,0.000034170105,0.022355681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981241,0.0007772565,0.000048655318,0.00018050718,0.00025879717,0.0000011487689,3.459056e-7,0.0000036198705,0.0006055739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996723,0.00047638203,0.00030977253,0.00009869511,0.0005422872,0.0018498638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992477,0.00011844859,0.00019347516,0.00010638939,0.00022468193,0.00010929977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030867276,0.00009198853,0.00021736411,0.000023737924,0.000600604,0.00003791667,0.00042277685,0.00007307866,0.000031365144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000612701,0.00005540614,0.0001564812,0.00023633755,0.00046321712,0.00017941563,0.000027211412,0.0007791739,0.0000034735572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005544808,0.00005737011,0.004366334,0.0000015832239,0.00005812048,2.931631e-7,0.0016586384,9.96732e-7,0.00009301635,0.9861759,0.00005507377,0.007527118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042772698,0.0003033978,0.036960717,0.000013504319,0.000057909772,0.00001924597,0.06652448,0.000010427102,0.000423762,0.89026713,0.0048228167,0.00016885168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024307354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025361388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117384404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008095547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011780844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4619421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595633389","doi":"","title":"Une justice fraternelle : Éléments de la pensée de Charles Doherty Gonthier (Fraternal Justice: Outlining Charles Doherty Gonthier’s Approach to Law, Morality and Community)","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Morality; Economic Justice; Tribute; Citizenship; Compassion; Humanism; Sociology; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.03094576199664323,"score_gpt":0.32528037689890216,"score_spread":0.29433461490225893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595633389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95908433,0.008618598,0.0013798793,0.0132065695,0.0017464625,0.000563189,0.000041500673,0.00010049228,0.01525899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9702739,0.01422737,0.002294983,0.0012177123,0.0022214036,0.000045139506,0.000008561728,0.00007502584,0.009635875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888361,0.004070477,0.00084068405,0.00060338236,0.00085560087,0.004793738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968725,0.00083360926,0.0005798285,0.0003989658,0.0004094439,0.0009056503],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013128788,0.00072096207,0.0008310125,0.00009212914,0.0071383067,0.0009678488,0.0012714965,0.0008245595,0.0000927471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010392314,0.00060640986,0.00028726718,0.0005612064,0.0025865058,0.0009578305,0.0004731465,0.012317393,0.00006237633],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005100069,0.0023086362,0.029336184,0.00064568955,0.0018062355,0.000050494476,0.28087354,0.0003940576,0.0052086473,0.64510083,0.0015277847,0.0322379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006095035,0.0014276078,0.07587352,0.00072641764,0.0049772128,0.0011861746,0.6031416,0.0026299213,0.00078507897,0.15830247,0.14117968,0.0036752827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.101108976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07529353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48679835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027679873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015196363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596834643","doi":"","title":"The Ontario Leadership Framework for Catholic Principals and Vice-Principals: Purpose versus Practice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Educational leadership; Leadership style; Political science; Pedagogy; Psychology; Management; Public relations","score_opus":0.08323041899183665,"score_gpt":0.3543342205135318,"score_spread":0.27110380152169516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596834643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53985435,0.0145644,0.00020911232,0.022933077,0.003907799,0.0040278398,0.000036646594,0.00023322922,0.41423354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8019998,0.006249926,0.013317898,0.00012095161,0.00057335006,0.000018743487,0.000073434865,0.00004900998,0.17759687],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809265,0.0003037543,0.00015004896,0.0004052721,0.00054730795,0.0005009464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99613696,0.0022982308,0.00060928083,0.00027900966,0.00050397334,0.00017253963],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000986431,0.00026306,0.00043954627,0.000018903846,0.0027366616,0.00010610378,0.00059199147,0.0005347181,0.0006687803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002038045,0.00025200186,0.00019832945,0.00006193812,0.00047721504,0.00055455096,0.0000919331,0.00037957515,0.000014960754],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014442935,0.00004801899,0.00016607772,0.00016106563,0.0003642077,0.0000031708303,0.93800145,0.0000019651407,0.00000946572,0.031983703,0.0004853667,0.027331226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051827787,0.000115658135,0.039529216,0.00010482346,0.0003641624,1.5519365e-7,0.5413036,0.0000033461638,0.000004197563,0.000080105034,0.4177121,0.00026436863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8718793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41722673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014644505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032721576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597031627","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4813","title":"STL’UL NUP: LEGAL LANDSCAPES OF THE HUL’QUMI’NUM MUSTIMUHW","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Identity (music); Meaning (existential); Ethnology; Humanities; Relation (database); Law; Geography; Political science; Sociology; Aesthetics; Art; Ecology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05527603088047359,"score_gpt":0.36526010277526394,"score_spread":0.3099840718947904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597031627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8275552,0.00021574447,0.00001887318,0.010349505,0.0012510055,0.00072146714,0.00004004967,0.00005247197,0.15979572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937594,0.000056840112,0.0002478027,0.00023425814,0.0006984296,0.000019456613,7.7669034e-7,0.000015472277,0.0049675456],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808246,0.00012925666,0.00033513794,0.00028150555,0.00076356763,0.00040806696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823993,0.0002339654,0.00045672292,0.00057794986,0.00035208045,0.00013935135],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000507994,0.00017772935,0.00035766183,0.000042641695,0.0014647973,0.00030905186,0.0022433538,0.00013083158,0.00025483355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021021895,0.00012282153,0.0001626717,0.00016549489,0.000648273,0.0007469075,0.0007805675,0.00020489254,0.00005004689],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009818277,0.0014968442,0.44764683,0.002583894,0.0015644458,0.000061153696,0.2275186,0.00195681,0.0170423,0.08603594,0.17540824,0.037703127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080266973,0.00008519144,0.8335537,0.0003111698,0.0005041578,7.8291583e-7,0.011155724,0.000049346272,0.0040120385,0.0002585107,0.14881314,0.00045360575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0143037625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055715116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38590685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076355376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013455872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597368698","doi":"","title":"Achieving Transparency in Implementing Abortion Laws","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Abortion; Human rights; Scrutiny; Supreme court; Appeal; Duty; Political science; Transparency (behavior)","score_opus":0.03905139960577451,"score_gpt":0.3768095536594647,"score_spread":0.3377581540536902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597368698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64750034,0.0016204716,0.00034018283,0.0011654781,0.0005445411,0.00048649934,0.0000040331192,0.00020173215,0.34813672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99616086,0.0001838333,0.000558059,0.000073690826,0.00069968204,0.000028405428,0.000007714481,0.000018142606,0.0022696059],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973928,0.00020249955,0.0005899065,0.00038295388,0.00038197942,0.0010498627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990887,0.0002701557,0.00013811889,0.00015079061,0.00017406867,0.00017815988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027617184,0.00021001228,0.0002934458,0.00010382341,0.0012224424,0.000092900154,0.00032389042,0.00015941502,0.00033601516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038823177,0.00019775926,0.00012497287,0.00080566725,0.00024082046,0.00043201828,0.000080958394,0.00030225734,0.00023323321],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055098197,0.0004709574,0.44400397,0.00012914583,0.00009197722,0.000030134483,0.3110977,0.000009938918,0.00454718,0.09151462,0.0026224586,0.14542682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075058825,0.000032752443,0.36266416,0.000106585874,0.000029345098,5.805004e-7,0.020031363,0.000015966994,0.0005220479,0.00033245067,0.6150756,0.00043858468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058687166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2097722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6124531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045278404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000077571596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9402162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597815503","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2919492","title":"Costs and the Changing Culture of Canadian Family Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.018622334874381054,"score_gpt":0.2941617295706168,"score_spread":0.2755393946962358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597815503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.695275,0.03554715,0.00008190891,0.056656543,0.0011230375,0.0006324666,0.0000096954,0.00002837673,0.21064581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9690232,0.027241144,0.000022580933,0.00022148444,0.00044626583,0.0000027368278,2.2963327e-7,0.0000046064247,0.0030377465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980026,0.00012917399,0.00011752646,0.00008738867,0.00024384337,0.0014195015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993858,0.000059748007,0.00019005148,0.00010003209,0.00014607217,0.00011832094],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002342782,0.00008075965,0.00014623048,0.00006283016,0.005819414,0.00018756918,0.00041900485,0.00006394925,0.0000046473247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064275996,0.000047023546,0.0000619404,0.0001141272,0.0006720707,0.0002104112,0.000047831618,0.0007316614,0.0000040237533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029862007,0.0000069002062,0.0015375776,0.000006267708,0.00018018609,0.0000027581414,0.08230758,0.0000015185567,0.00006465688,0.8968038,0.0007989182,0.01825996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021594588,0.00008945954,0.015406902,0.00008169916,0.00032357976,0.000034267625,0.8166214,0.00002966188,0.000021360842,0.05003169,0.11488492,0.00031555665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38845822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7818285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84677213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082775916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009787842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601584935","doi":"","title":"Review of Harring, Sidney L., White Man=s Law: Native People in Nineteenth-Century Canadian Jurisprudence","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; White (mutation); Law; Political science; Sociology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.03566529163800994,"score_gpt":0.28181270599885355,"score_spread":0.2461474143608436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601584935","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010581731,0.78402406,7.683122e-8,0.004698762,0.00016312845,0.0005085401,0.000009955181,0.000014340042,0.21047531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014899702,0.9655582,0.000061896426,0.016951334,0.00005435267,0.000054433458,0.0000036945187,0.0000078231415,0.0024086148],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851674,0.0002718195,0.00037370654,0.00025186723,0.00026715922,0.00031870266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924463,0.00005249177,0.00017810302,0.00015105052,0.00012726092,0.00024645837],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005549013,0.00015520626,0.00057006784,0.000024166658,0.00033940317,0.000010137846,0.0002182559,0.000061364015,0.002125837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000218292,0.00013293934,0.00010538313,0.00019338493,0.00046479076,0.00020656703,0.00004015667,0.00016769195,0.000058973917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002344624,0.00010502103,0.0031162004,0.043601662,0.00006105564,0.000023870907,0.036975544,1.521752e-7,0.0000041350745,0.21592037,0.69062316,0.009566496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007475717,0.00001217084,0.00053868146,0.017860895,0.000047586804,7.458186e-7,0.00014146091,8.604947e-7,2.0923115e-7,0.0000144431215,0.98114854,0.00015964686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39843866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78588945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38745078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008743378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000082382976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99878633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602182565","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4811","title":"WANISKĀ: REIMAGINING THE FUTURE WITH INDIGENOUS LEGAL TRADITIONS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Narrative; Power (physics); Sociology; Law; Commission; Political science; Aesthetics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.05045419123617117,"score_gpt":0.3497937817313528,"score_spread":0.2993395904951816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602182565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.704895,0.00041321007,0.0001346159,0.07834725,0.001564632,0.001511067,0.00005879508,0.00015426382,0.21292114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99402934,0.00010709239,0.0007607799,0.0005320729,0.0020853905,0.000047647292,0.0000017680729,0.000017127748,0.0024187989],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985316,0.00008910473,0.00018226553,0.0002430584,0.00056121935,0.0003927489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880975,0.00014253925,0.00024817415,0.00042968916,0.0002311024,0.00013871239],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037547597,0.00015031868,0.00021568032,0.00003507243,0.0042946776,0.00076590205,0.0014945213,0.0000751668,0.000116628325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024257567,0.00008525407,0.0000655356,0.00013726029,0.0007417425,0.0010020635,0.00014896019,0.0003029226,0.000044472985],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000512438,0.000535814,0.067118585,0.00042954937,0.0009556072,0.00017371838,0.7470946,0.00051214825,0.0008529623,0.08151377,0.054732107,0.045568753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005580543,0.00014137955,0.51031893,0.00015416638,0.00050400133,0.0000045565725,0.05202099,0.000009981133,0.00029169704,0.0002993282,0.435247,0.00044989985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010480583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008021885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69507354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009413767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018233692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603201379","doi":"","title":"Limiting the Legal Liability of Religious Institutions for their Clergy: Cavanaugh v. Grenville Christian College","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Appeal; Liability; Obligation; Law; Jurisprudence; Legal liability","score_opus":0.03983698994163903,"score_gpt":0.3037155938956197,"score_spread":0.26387860395398066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603201379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8313914,0.0017421361,0.0010543931,0.082243845,0.0022914843,0.0013942322,0.0006723323,0.00013827119,0.0790719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997174,0.00058433734,0.0004966781,0.00024708646,0.0010717179,0.00002860179,0.0000011482158,0.000012522209,0.00038387178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981557,0.00027296145,0.00046323627,0.00019696752,0.00040553964,0.0005055672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980859,0.00076703937,0.0003319154,0.00019304974,0.00045968496,0.00016237517],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014059079,0.00016119312,0.0002853037,0.000023027618,0.0047188303,0.00009209595,0.00048429036,0.00011036454,0.000051054423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001261727,0.000078412944,0.00027283133,0.00019364347,0.0016155615,0.0002827246,0.00009902783,0.00022290331,0.000008103207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012942113,0.00022212834,0.0033644298,0.00003454504,0.0003222451,0.00001751504,0.044499334,0.000059932023,0.0012750783,0.9158984,0.022666564,0.011510438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069793337,0.0000877052,0.002344158,0.00009106735,0.0000439725,0.00001884988,0.01779131,0.000007518169,0.00040003296,0.0049931468,0.9733345,0.00018981319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012355316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056639176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9506679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029838126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024879412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603315228","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4809","title":"LISTENING TO LAW","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Connaught Fund; University of Toronto; University of Minnesota","keywords":"Active listening; Humanities; Identity (music); Sociology; Indigenous; Character (mathematics); Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.08423744014614801,"score_gpt":0.39914969431920366,"score_spread":0.3149122541730557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603315228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30928892,0.00008558699,0.0000778492,0.018025208,0.0009872001,0.0007237981,0.000013403327,0.00009738065,0.67070067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899125,0.000014624084,0.0017225528,0.0012790468,0.0008023105,0.000027176879,4.7968274e-7,0.0000137549005,0.0062275333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859315,0.00005705252,0.00020706649,0.0002645095,0.0004928156,0.00038538285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880046,0.00013870314,0.00016488536,0.00037539308,0.00025949712,0.0002610557],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004114998,0.00012502202,0.00024222839,0.0000377198,0.0018758082,0.0006124869,0.0014102572,0.00008101719,0.00017630703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016945123,0.00011261694,0.000071424976,0.000103516315,0.00034324577,0.00078703644,0.00061872066,0.00011372259,0.00025972887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005509334,0.0004686478,0.054632008,0.00085381157,0.0005423715,0.00009505105,0.3695933,0.0009068207,0.011837621,0.4061637,0.11441369,0.039942067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005207444,0.00012126988,0.22430357,0.00032271247,0.00028168998,4.63071e-7,0.011276833,0.000015139749,0.0028304397,0.00044969356,0.7592269,0.00065051304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029402759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00767057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6806236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009815268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046630874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603920394","doi":"10.1177/000332861609800306","title":"The Importance of Moral Authority: Reflections on Current Events in the Anglican Communion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Current (fluid); Philosophy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.17359864084435128,"score_gpt":0.4484727301166583,"score_spread":0.274874089272307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603920394","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3275005,0.19503142,0.00002819122,0.3693503,0.0007349477,0.0042578126,0.00003829144,0.00018321976,0.102875315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8536625,0.14463513,0.000016249443,0.0012324507,0.000090419606,0.00014965225,0.0000012595515,0.0000034156187,0.0002089682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671733,0.0020075259,0.00035446647,0.00018357682,0.00040946162,0.00032763815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766624,0.0016001022,0.00021889148,0.00035948894,0.00009747902,0.000057825837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028870055,0.00012579256,0.00029668902,0.000011992289,0.0008036837,0.00001011693,0.00076654163,0.000054939374,0.00010794664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030704027,0.00004345368,0.00016643926,0.00045683546,0.0009336449,0.00006226461,0.00011328206,0.00025532802,0.000022945693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019849584,0.00019444153,0.038779546,0.00005055946,0.000017233526,0.000002201466,0.002600833,7.435903e-8,0.000011991955,0.8186159,0.0046566483,0.13505071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021937703,0.00021477662,0.18041402,0.0014523998,0.000040928036,0.0000014855215,0.0024105208,3.8943762e-7,0.000005637265,0.04862278,0.76642543,0.00019224636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039543104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003907209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7699931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013026496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030759864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61813664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604334801","doi":"10.7202/1038490ar","title":"The Lifeworlds of Law: On Revitalizing Indigenous Legal Orders Today","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Vanier College","funders":"","keywords":"Lifeworld; Indigenous; Law; Constitutionalism; Sociology; Constitutional law; Political science; Democracy; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.03365580843012047,"score_gpt":0.31255796152186643,"score_spread":0.278902153091746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604334801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09197352,0.001247651,0.000013653134,0.030554472,0.0017843988,0.00043812997,0.000032884993,0.000079541765,0.87387574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968848,0.0009021559,0.000092753944,0.0003992701,0.00043871847,0.0000048441852,1.4148863e-7,0.000011124238,0.0012661614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980646,0.00032182748,0.0003356825,0.00013464889,0.0006578902,0.0004853934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987549,0.0004756796,0.00026145388,0.0001239978,0.00023450599,0.00014947026],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012120124,0.000128575,0.0002038948,0.000017359853,0.011931054,0.00011512918,0.0003971156,0.00007740319,0.00008028853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041800228,0.000059688173,0.00016059815,0.000113259586,0.00079952774,0.00032708957,0.000059969097,0.00023527048,0.000045365614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032859927,0.000037408696,0.0002710682,0.0000043848527,0.00009320278,0.000013573169,0.0038583197,0.000002971039,0.00017509941,0.9781104,0.00084980374,0.016550923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026372058,0.00008435412,0.0003688835,0.0001139966,0.000016766622,0.000006510044,0.0018462342,1.2279871e-7,0.00052318827,0.0014550845,0.99520254,0.00011860987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015850656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.071416855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031271303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001916223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99070287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604920027","doi":"10.4000/droitcultures.4073","title":"La situation juridique des conjoints de fait québécois","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Droit et Cultures","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill Genome Centre; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Université de Sherbrooke; Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University Health Centre; International Civil Aviation Organization","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Art; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03351568868676169,"score_gpt":0.3469297845803818,"score_spread":0.3134140958936201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604920027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7684266,0.0061989077,0.000115482406,0.03654192,0.0008401398,0.00039087082,0.000053167616,0.00011906205,0.18731384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9542514,0.0041840766,0.00096194603,0.0006462407,0.00070911075,0.000045398192,0.000011203342,0.00002083697,0.039169792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976612,0.0006143486,0.00027215402,0.0003834456,0.0004437023,0.0006251907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987376,0.00019391878,0.00025219505,0.00030198207,0.00028437385,0.00022996284],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00103564,0.00029017407,0.00034149757,0.00001911601,0.0034441908,0.0007367184,0.00061722106,0.00045076903,0.0003674283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002105631,0.00025071882,0.00022164438,0.000090749774,0.002774094,0.0010447007,0.00018581774,0.0004353869,0.00034836878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019994752,0.00017821237,0.007395913,0.00013069618,0.0002297211,0.00004834428,0.4289341,0.000029595523,0.0015988493,0.51100343,0.027492877,0.022938272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005021722,0.00005356279,0.29613757,0.00030294838,0.0001416332,0.000012188301,0.033416647,0.000029009057,0.0012116845,0.021989778,0.6456508,0.0005520306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24186482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3129738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6181579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006994622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036075182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606399519","doi":"10.1177/000332861709900139","title":"Book Review: Aging Matters: Finding Your Calling for the Rest of Your Life","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rest (music); Philosophy; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.15974509083314753,"score_gpt":0.427119041823704,"score_spread":0.2673739509905565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606399519","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025091288,0.7995454,0.00007359005,0.1946832,0.00012727329,0.0013672105,0.0000093011295,0.00003909867,0.0039040146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014116365,0.9012038,0.000227583,0.08127103,0.000364307,0.00021374607,0.000002418746,0.000010111815,0.0025906563],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981321,0.00033342896,0.00047195647,0.0002873119,0.000343079,0.0004320948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974971,0.0010566062,0.0006450835,0.00047282703,0.00019561186,0.00013276844],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002602307,0.0001785044,0.0006801134,0.000008883154,0.002086216,0.00007398075,0.0011305498,0.00007426866,0.0010139263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013278943,0.000092000526,0.0003833605,0.00009183822,0.0009765915,0.00017975517,0.00025001497,0.00019790723,0.00003528811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014893099,0.000059150287,0.0016853724,0.0056208726,0.00020084751,0.000007672699,0.0023642345,0.0000010937223,0.0000371167,0.03443927,0.90974045,0.045829017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009393544,0.000028751387,0.0027523919,0.0071228184,0.0001943803,6.2466233e-7,0.00048539334,0.000003664256,0.0000068916456,0.0003353841,0.9888235,0.00015229003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006797083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000076123906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113412164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058990852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043583153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606519287","doi":"","title":"The Doctrine of Lost Modern Grant and Prescriptive Easements in Newfoundland","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Easement; Political science; Humanities; Doctrine; Law; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02591238136236075,"score_gpt":0.28901682981998017,"score_spread":0.26310444845761943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606519287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9708982,0.0015586297,0.00006101014,0.0065081553,0.00029774467,0.00023312036,0.000012948783,0.0000099458,0.02042022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99639255,0.002273343,0.000052907846,0.000055516135,0.00018119377,0.0000031170707,1.4160854e-7,0.0000046258106,0.0010365926],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988044,0.00018049162,0.00023726576,0.0001025734,0.00037868644,0.00029658314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936676,0.00020364021,0.0001426351,0.00006412567,0.00012440095,0.00009843156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067197165,0.00008422141,0.00014662708,0.000016787175,0.0010207538,0.000092305185,0.00015618757,0.00003987115,0.00003699631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017790913,0.00003893967,0.00004312594,0.000076397555,0.00063409953,0.0002646271,0.00007322848,0.00012064229,0.0000057387056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005554046,0.0002990586,0.57394147,0.000028804772,0.00041513608,0.00012367444,0.13712716,0.000014090176,0.005300249,0.17043462,0.0023064946,0.10945382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006241842,0.00029094305,0.5186122,0.0004480883,0.00009050313,0.000040691615,0.013299615,0.00004871923,0.00030343028,0.051438004,0.40862653,0.0005594239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020296045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1860081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40632004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014906851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029132761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98622787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606711388","doi":"","title":"Do constitutional rights matter? The impact of section 35 on Aboriginal and treaty rights in Canada.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deep Blue (University of Michigan)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Section (typography); Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.008240359850108219,"score_gpt":0.2516302483531524,"score_spread":0.2433898885030442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606711388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879144,0.00005255668,0.00003550145,0.00025283592,0.00009358611,0.00012904033,0.00002517022,0.0000057408142,0.011491167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997215,0.000017734434,0.00005286629,0.000011440754,0.000043250453,7.3707014e-8,0.0000026926439,9.024468e-7,0.00014948843],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999312,0.00006961236,0.000082149694,0.000124746,0.00023685333,0.00017468238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957436,0.00013949264,0.000093170944,0.000061043575,0.00006857797,0.00006334996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020082007,0.00007863883,0.00014564564,0.000049366638,0.00064785284,0.0000065630716,0.00012753044,0.000052371706,0.0001322609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000064900446,0.00005772355,0.000051428262,0.00018406878,0.0008230916,0.00011823565,0.000016624947,0.000109272776,0.0000036511135],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006961525,0.00028860493,0.21785557,0.00003301661,0.00044390294,0.00012680548,0.6278344,0.00093551,0.0007092811,0.14906313,0.0010037627,0.0010099037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007804946,0.00005414268,0.90270436,0.00004185052,0.000034697863,0.0000032990022,0.08336118,0.0000455948,0.00011834911,0.000587729,0.012113731,0.00015455308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97522116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99895155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6848488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004780377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028012693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49828258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W260681899","doi":"","title":"Trapped In-between A Narrative Exploration of Race, Gender, and Class.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Race (biology); Class (philosophy); Gender studies; Narrative inquiry; Multiculturalism; Identity (music); China; Ethnic group; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Political science; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Anthropology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.12299807240226361,"score_gpt":0.3600744228277921,"score_spread":0.2370763504255285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W260681899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.931503,0.00020006213,0.00011890636,0.0027009936,0.00003473135,0.0002487462,9.4960285e-7,0.000027777582,0.06516481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99786,0.0005032468,0.00023658655,0.000031298685,0.00006441603,0.000013009078,0.0000013243346,0.0000024600117,0.0012876462],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926865,0.00012229856,0.00015548721,0.00011815171,0.0001868612,0.0001485404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968666,0.000113192225,0.000055203647,0.00003513757,0.00006573554,0.000044052624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026194652,0.00006193884,0.00015073514,0.000028384547,0.00022490782,0.000018299992,0.00005410585,0.000060547412,0.00008583564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000118905526,0.000047492253,0.000023245222,0.00022368331,0.00021772648,0.0004178687,0.000019216846,0.00005818633,0.000004587241],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017531058,0.00004218024,0.19488066,0.000009125367,0.000036311587,0.000001870082,0.78369546,0.0000062948307,0.000289662,0.0137519855,0.000779999,0.006488924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067068194,0.00004849561,0.37088385,0.000013446082,0.000013568835,1.2769219e-7,0.6067644,0.000029073786,0.00025164027,0.003702497,0.017447494,0.00017476198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035104183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072874357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1769311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005541212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021251702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5306726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607195990","doi":"10.29173/alr772","title":"A Constitutional Future for Abortion Rights in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Entitlement (fair division); Accountability; Political science; Democracy; Law; Transparency (behavior); Abortion law; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Institution; Reproductive rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Family planning; Research methodology; Population; Politics; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.02848064852639465,"score_gpt":0.33161051175278417,"score_spread":0.3031298632263895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607195990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018930573,0.10286716,0.000010252315,0.22520882,0.0038095242,0.0048351134,0.000071250586,0.000031553955,0.64423573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831481,0.012701972,0.00011633918,0.0023048224,0.00050314,0.0001781788,0.00001427485,0.0000022106958,0.0010309822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992027,0.00005606244,0.00017991675,0.00014835745,0.00019898743,0.00021392049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994072,0.00015255198,0.00013317134,0.00014609925,0.00009517297,0.00006582409],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022369853,0.00008230463,0.00022599516,0.0000021909418,0.0016836011,0.00004373541,0.00023928857,0.00003694604,0.00013896562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038905532,0.000058907528,0.00006046085,0.00003592224,0.0004085408,0.0002125223,0.00002442539,0.00006214639,0.000016660104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014414188,0.0000059548893,0.0017621939,0.0001423935,0.000011680084,0.0000013507619,0.00020685462,1.5633245e-7,2.9941012e-7,0.9876968,0.008606036,0.0015648317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012375004,0.0000025092088,0.004271259,0.00054084155,0.00002040793,3.348326e-7,0.000053321863,9.3352617e-7,0.0000016404277,0.0005387466,0.99435204,0.00009423265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99796003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99990433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98715806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004374936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037651678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607865436","doi":"","title":"Ties that Bind: Religious Freedom and Communities (Introduction)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Buckingham; Sociology; Law; Freedom of religion; Political science; Theme (computing); Human rights; Media studies; History","score_opus":0.017204371392293586,"score_gpt":0.2654268462365242,"score_spread":0.2482224748442306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607865436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89613885,0.01550176,0.00033350394,0.0834188,0.0009891442,0.00019483379,0.0000038775584,0.00012919158,0.003290051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90830445,0.08205271,0.000052731662,0.000060582817,0.0017023274,0.0000055931655,5.143312e-7,0.000010826152,0.007810266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974906,0.0002956902,0.00016574713,0.00012168899,0.00037582678,0.0015504888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934924,0.00017579774,0.00012756971,0.00011272389,0.00013985818,0.00009481221],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015754587,0.000136777,0.00018111568,0.000052565476,0.0019479054,0.00013461776,0.00026789255,0.000084648505,0.00007770186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018410514,0.000082553786,0.00007562342,0.00008947773,0.00081465906,0.00044366036,0.00007117928,0.00073915627,0.0000429333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001144472,0.00008531491,0.06313613,0.000011278426,0.00070820976,0.0000042587308,0.09397232,0.0000051941734,0.00052607537,0.7480109,0.022810329,0.07061555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012317876,0.00030317466,0.0060456498,0.00005953684,0.000083988605,0.0001579933,0.37518618,0.000001948727,0.00009027683,0.24226142,0.37406877,0.0005092589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006851635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045612827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50574946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001064075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004262293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612051069","doi":"","title":"La proclamation royale du 6 décembre 1869 (The Royal Proclamation of December 6th, 1869)","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Proclamation; Humanities; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0103040514321525,"score_gpt":0.26881022328976406,"score_spread":0.25850617185761154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612051069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8497466,0.03509277,0.0021640244,0.06927502,0.0012194377,0.0015498938,0.00001668668,0.00011716021,0.040818438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689186,0.0034888303,0.00010482684,0.00016832064,0.0014020693,0.00002061264,0.000010050769,0.000020273474,0.025866397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99496657,0.0009361715,0.00070402963,0.00028714215,0.00091523636,0.0021908479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809784,0.00025743688,0.0007772857,0.00015691938,0.00058039854,0.00013014846],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032866935,0.0003258016,0.00039790306,0.000057830235,0.0015830992,0.00018740259,0.00053613307,0.0003328733,0.0001747526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006615997,0.00023469701,0.00030793122,0.0005642159,0.0005058981,0.0006105075,0.000050940427,0.0021270649,0.00012322611],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025922683,0.0011572093,0.004901307,0.00020327554,0.0011772916,0.000010942597,0.08448527,0.009027741,0.00033231336,0.45671278,0.025532363,0.41620028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005050648,0.0028830785,0.058570597,0.0013487084,0.0014420875,0.0004702782,0.11462947,0.0076315207,0.00051759626,0.42002982,0.3851582,0.002268004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013982801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071731047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41393226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023482917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026520744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612273884","doi":"","title":"Review of Constitutional Studies Book Notes - December 2015","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Honour; Constitution; Treaty; Law; History; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03853374343892562,"score_gpt":0.368290323545758,"score_spread":0.3297565801068324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612273884","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030535033,0.9412095,0.00066048413,0.048629336,0.00038944642,0.00024966753,0.0000062534623,0.00003265574,0.005769183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2236091,0.77163583,0.00006696729,0.0006245313,0.0003596798,0.000007980804,3.7202062e-7,0.0000043497143,0.0036911631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975244,0.00023046783,0.00035192096,0.00013953316,0.00048635204,0.0012673654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985733,0.00041316406,0.00025745563,0.0000770292,0.0005970261,0.00008199316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024877316,0.00012632048,0.00031820717,0.000028794158,0.0006784547,0.000012696267,0.00022870387,0.00005399398,0.00026373996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025283834,0.00006968885,0.00016427362,0.0001348117,0.0016408069,0.00034672793,0.000051987336,0.00038201685,0.00007589918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020313451,0.00005208393,0.0025621585,0.00017248432,0.00073391496,0.0000020291905,0.0018639334,4.8598366e-7,0.00020161776,0.929804,0.04740185,0.017185086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074086554,0.0001380855,0.0003251757,0.004347548,0.00016252641,0.000054986303,0.0066538104,1.4066264e-7,0.0001094347,0.09145085,0.89570504,0.0003115427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001812153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022728944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8483032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014901259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020662525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60456216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W261245","doi":"","title":"Family Homes on Reserves and Matrimonial Interests and Rights Act: A Constitutional Division of Powers Analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Federalism; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Jurisdiction; Doctrine; Interim; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02475971335948701,"score_gpt":0.32206611284208053,"score_spread":0.2973063994825935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W261245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99206144,0.0040599257,0.00012504647,0.0013509758,0.00011058811,0.00009063462,0.0000046660884,0.00001322494,0.002183528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99725664,0.0022403398,0.000059398983,0.000013198104,0.00010831233,0.0000012632538,0.0000016176232,0.000002720387,0.00031651868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981354,0.00020693285,0.00021853116,0.00016679466,0.0005175546,0.0007547805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930084,0.00013477837,0.00016337977,0.000057129553,0.00018255283,0.00016131076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001550795,0.00011564948,0.00026182,0.00013931486,0.0006268556,0.00008372359,0.00014842076,0.0000763563,0.0000080610935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029603895,0.00007989277,0.000095166346,0.00029144494,0.0009834457,0.00025405164,0.000063027524,0.0005038205,0.0000025665374],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029621262,0.00011973386,0.30493036,0.000007854183,0.0017809642,0.000008219199,0.016060967,0.00005548503,0.00017004338,0.6711989,0.00041613035,0.0049551143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037539648,0.0015970038,0.6807825,0.00014348025,0.0008893091,0.000037889913,0.08728983,0.00010108796,0.000097765835,0.21323726,0.011344928,0.000725013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004408031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015161899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45796168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005649414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006695473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8460696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612860099","doi":"10.5040/9781782259725.ch-005","title":"National Paths Towards Private Ordering","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Institutionalisation; Intervention (counseling); Family law; Economic Justice; Political science; Outcome (game theory); Private law; Proposition; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Public law; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.09103296144366603,"score_gpt":0.35638343680549595,"score_spread":0.26535047536182993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612860099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18414184,0.00011540601,0.0001765322,0.010309226,0.00043754707,0.00016489933,0.0000020346436,0.00020984837,0.80444264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882566,0.00002559305,0.0026462595,0.00029003058,0.00032962367,0.000011608604,0.0000012900542,0.000003581543,0.008435467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989716,0.000049091468,0.00008794831,0.0001062013,0.00059499854,0.00019018067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995206,0.000030476736,0.000025985491,0.000033495297,0.0002790536,0.00011036917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048243607,0.000057009205,0.000073479736,0.0000120906325,0.00033906766,0.000059181486,0.00012630304,0.000041648243,0.00021393163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090670853,0.000042076463,0.000029478906,0.00013680212,0.000121285244,0.00019231037,0.000069583264,0.000051610245,0.00019432115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014680464,0.000103591854,0.017387515,0.0000106764355,0.00008925482,0.0000064935343,0.14357825,0.00012312362,0.00018008878,0.7318512,0.08089283,0.025762258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026177964,0.000015663021,0.0112642925,0.0000050531567,0.0000039096067,2.5938263e-7,0.014432175,0.00007415661,0.00010193089,0.006276474,0.96739304,0.00017126258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051945103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016401728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88650024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024874075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013225948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.785258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614061493","doi":"","title":"Reconciling Crown and Indigenous Legal Orders: The Reciprocal Benefits of Reserving an Indigenous Seat on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Supreme court; Reciprocal; Law; Political science; Crown (dentistry); Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06001522478871164,"score_gpt":0.3408741564477494,"score_spread":0.28085893165903775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614061493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87732977,0.090427384,2.7989938e-7,0.0039839395,0.00025282713,0.0011972446,0.000057971378,0.000010895285,0.026739692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9406663,0.058752943,0.000010685868,0.00039601888,0.0001011966,0.000020511656,0.000004900339,0.000008399042,0.000039018087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981223,0.00018730389,0.00048213892,0.00021627694,0.00063086697,0.00036113826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983855,0.0001665136,0.00059871457,0.00042174023,0.0003227293,0.00010478977],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019722532,0.00017364907,0.00049626204,0.000008310009,0.002678137,0.00006916216,0.0006343295,0.00006166676,0.000011882347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026715454,0.00008526313,0.0000766682,0.0000757234,0.0011238449,0.00029412238,0.00018721988,0.00024064766,2.6260594e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083565144,0.00020558099,0.0050390614,0.008639292,0.00026943634,0.0000026599187,0.07337735,0.0000039189913,0.000032164255,0.79320383,0.00047952833,0.118663594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060799636,0.00043622323,0.015732251,0.015518154,0.00022884637,0.000005388053,0.0133749135,0.000008591709,0.0006532922,0.00069220405,0.9521994,0.0005427429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80281174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89272165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9517199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016987846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028497545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616165810","doi":"","title":"Mutual Aid and Service Agreements: Wise Practices for First Nations Communities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Service (business); Business; Economic growth; Public relations; Political science; Marketing; Economics","score_opus":0.06283783719554008,"score_gpt":0.3151108793625628,"score_spread":0.25227304216702273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616165810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.786062,0.0002888901,0.000039937113,0.05496018,0.00043846006,0.0009750099,0.00023796482,0.0001572135,0.15684037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98757714,0.00078364246,0.0011422328,0.0002648399,0.00012111054,0.000009735932,0.000026926706,0.000013567044,0.010060832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986804,0.00028130875,0.00013415606,0.00022168685,0.00031042527,0.0003719898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974689,0.00093037565,0.0004522273,0.00046907138,0.0004953881,0.00018406626],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055499654,0.00017480757,0.00021486985,0.0001496772,0.020891484,0.00075860054,0.0011104625,0.00012893244,0.000092871065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016017033,0.0001847504,0.000080625825,0.00025346145,0.0009055327,0.0031372781,0.000624723,0.0003228309,0.00002879024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037493775,0.0005921012,0.3632822,0.00028372856,0.0011215764,0.000051417883,0.22180451,0.000024910418,0.00005876221,0.39250034,0.016534708,0.0033707898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009732124,0.000033617045,0.015506883,0.00006606992,0.00012538346,6.1193936e-7,0.0954529,0.000025162697,0.000012058481,0.00027046728,0.88729197,0.00024165212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028020881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62275887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8707573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023256577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011159712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98038316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616335932","doi":"","title":"From Moore to More: How the Social Model of Disability May Be Applied to Build More Inclusive and Accessible Education Systems","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Social model of disability; Inclusion (mineral); Special education; Order (exchange); Foundation (evidence); Education Act; Political science; Law; Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Social science; Business","score_opus":0.022220448833650857,"score_gpt":0.34000462729355885,"score_spread":0.317784178459908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616335932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8024623,0.00045355465,0.000996361,0.194937,0.0001563321,0.0005466014,0.000028068562,0.00001741926,0.00040236427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971774,0.00032022662,0.00009758467,0.00029907448,0.0010034662,0.00007096479,0.0000013876813,0.000011423182,0.0010184717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977715,0.00015836349,0.00023238575,0.0002524391,0.00057036645,0.0010149148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915403,0.000150662,0.00019758471,0.00012813731,0.00022631155,0.00014330006],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011850129,0.00015415512,0.00025923765,0.000025360046,0.0014518736,0.0001316144,0.00047141642,0.00010016273,0.0000073843917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026181625,0.000083028914,0.000074343145,0.00021900315,0.00047287552,0.00030672995,0.00019883482,0.0004018731,0.0000024617202],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003274293,0.00033908463,0.017923063,0.000039234055,0.0005803932,2.7898494e-7,0.3400035,0.00043024216,0.014142755,0.5137318,0.006594982,0.105887234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010183327,0.00014369094,0.026868256,0.0001196967,0.00018367512,0.0000033910121,0.84227324,0.00013846936,0.0005039592,0.119881585,0.008202808,0.000662919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008791971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007895799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5022697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023414327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012692045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2617488593","doi":"","title":"Sexual Orientation and Legal Rights in Canada: A Chronological Overview","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Orientation (vector space); Political science; Business; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04148150355390763,"score_gpt":0.31095513178070266,"score_spread":0.26947362822679505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2617488593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95423,0.0004863555,0.00000341953,0.0012839735,0.00012021367,0.00014659585,9.488727e-7,0.000016324442,0.043712143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99788994,0.00006729543,0.00019076938,0.00017724193,0.000028809442,0.000009420435,7.0538397e-7,0.000001042886,0.0016347647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991977,0.00014160428,0.0001061046,0.0001534065,0.00019499128,0.00020617188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997842,0.00007002079,0.000022690372,0.000033211825,0.000027841903,0.000062055784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017409855,0.000061348874,0.00010555263,0.000008871657,0.0003134884,0.00002804275,0.00004474289,0.000037540718,0.00035241916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014130013,0.000041540243,0.0000080752525,0.00013013222,0.00010783538,0.00014319136,0.000014771611,0.000066167806,0.0000060485927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046931787,0.000033137778,0.09994417,0.0000099483295,0.000015636137,0.0000292708,0.006396816,0.000004808546,0.000025290314,0.88842297,0.0025580311,0.00255522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048736206,0.0000333303,0.4396542,0.000007916403,0.000007804821,0.0000018198205,0.025618438,0.000015353176,0.000056281926,0.0010131104,0.53287905,0.00022533126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9953638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88740987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006774189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028334578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38587427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619029461","doi":"","title":"Law and Mental Health: A Relationship in Crisis? (Introduction)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Economics; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.015774285328702804,"score_gpt":0.31188239880670643,"score_spread":0.29610811347800364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619029461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65359795,0.003287929,0.00003509887,0.3380805,0.0009197664,0.00026957004,0.0000014767681,0.000041614076,0.0037660976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99520093,0.0024132214,0.00014687672,0.00034057372,0.0010459557,0.0000045469105,0.0000012707062,0.000005870241,0.0008407645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800503,0.00018357162,0.00019870377,0.00014574094,0.0002446184,0.0012223615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965143,0.000050580402,0.00009650922,0.00005331693,0.000048548118,0.000099632634],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024671,0.00007920561,0.00012214485,0.000040005052,0.0017041411,0.000083479375,0.00010623508,0.0000660327,0.000044337838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021575703,0.00006715124,0.000039107676,0.00016197716,0.00020802542,0.00042862917,0.00002204861,0.0018386429,0.000015728112],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008898385,0.000024405892,0.0107059525,0.0000014985499,0.000016091963,2.6628445e-7,0.011302181,6.8918735e-7,0.000044529137,0.97542006,0.0011366685,0.0013387344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011358811,0.00017434741,0.034692712,0.000011965974,0.000012048162,0.00012428866,0.1352343,0.0000069115026,0.000009770063,0.46777046,0.36051035,0.0003169476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009216554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33788624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5076496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009472106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056269276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619583301","doi":"10.7202/1073015ar","title":"Rethinking the Archetypal Conversation: How Seriously? In What Directions? Who Does the Thinking?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Communication; Philosophy","score_opus":0.048004041784288014,"score_gpt":0.2890501549153711,"score_spread":0.2410461131310831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619583301","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19990075,0.0014652759,0.000028846116,0.7948241,0.00062217773,0.0005126358,0.0000019636357,0.00014860927,0.0024956209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987712,0.0029123803,0.00013753815,0.007946343,0.0006746641,0.000057916284,0.0000013981261,0.000009397322,0.00054831925],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800295,0.0007238312,0.00015930925,0.00024865172,0.000556375,0.00030885922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985977,0.0009655193,0.000104925006,0.00014777547,0.000099960176,0.00008414149],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012388433,0.00013109895,0.00017413704,0.000015632708,0.002161499,0.0007328451,0.00048526493,0.00008822653,0.00011733277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002232013,0.0000623058,0.00011067235,0.00053378165,0.0005597813,0.0006608358,0.00015918181,0.00038278443,0.000029243825],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010166693,0.000008526952,0.018845731,0.000011182183,0.000050806408,0.0000028678237,0.96458465,0.000016927517,0.000030644293,0.003976005,0.0032682081,0.009194308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029113583,0.000024653846,0.033480596,0.00010125451,0.000051377065,6.5441304e-7,0.6079991,0.0003802551,0.00015339047,0.009363005,0.3478626,0.00029201928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077278493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02292946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7878113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017383287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060593622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620313501","doi":"","title":"Uneasy Partners: Multiculturalism and Rights in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Religious studies; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03337593436744646,"score_gpt":0.3143858105787556,"score_spread":0.28100987621130913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620313501","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047158278,0.0010799291,2.787079e-7,0.0016861486,0.00047740486,0.0005513102,0.0000156818,0.000054888045,0.99141854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05773018,0.00032893443,0.00016692803,0.00042555475,0.00048458693,0.000014708164,0.000024873707,0.000010382964,0.94081384],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791425,0.00008722185,0.00034210715,0.00038802862,0.00069398416,0.00057439244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990556,0.0003229212,0.00012861344,0.00010913312,0.00014162724,0.00024208042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028551082,0.0003038642,0.00045080835,0.00004311388,0.00056384876,0.00007311791,0.00022359747,0.00031566917,0.0003534818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010815229,0.00020740723,0.00006051954,0.00010295964,0.00044780265,0.00013952013,0.00008904437,0.0003828685,0.000027558273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018791465,0.0000315028,0.0019972362,0.00009695777,0.00020189323,0.00033079914,0.059312116,0.000006232967,0.0000027593562,0.18403064,0.75099605,0.0029750194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022144649,0.0000047618228,0.0024153588,0.00007626512,0.000020698568,6.1464686e-7,0.005011724,0.000003273706,0.0000030483845,0.0007791977,0.9910728,0.00039080947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99846715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99991804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24007675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038997072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011412081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620765319","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1257","title":"Small Claims Court: A Vehicle for Social Change and the Case for Equitable Relief","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Appeal; Grassroots; Legislature; Political science; Law; Scope (computer science); Debt; Public administration; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.1706944303902091,"score_gpt":0.40060602750015883,"score_spread":0.22991159710994974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620765319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6458845,0.0008608614,0.000043704225,0.34285304,0.00048318223,0.0012070879,0.00009645356,0.000017061026,0.0085540805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98707104,0.0002825092,0.00015148257,0.001841356,0.010012398,0.000043020555,4.45742e-7,0.000010125846,0.00058762374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990016,0.00010957346,0.00023975622,0.00009583152,0.00015966452,0.0003935298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987923,0.00029440998,0.0004672687,0.000048818063,0.00030833413,0.000088879555],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015302409,0.000105823456,0.00034072323,0.000018822784,0.011503498,0.000430159,0.00020952772,0.00013678675,0.0000025034092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042156858,0.00006821882,0.00019829976,0.000026917556,0.0014721925,0.00033832484,0.00009907622,0.00014541527,3.655955e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024124223,0.000030440868,0.000060154354,0.00004438671,0.00009945717,0.000012581901,0.18792011,2.926744e-8,0.000020843725,0.7975921,0.0033063206,0.010672337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013158874,0.0004064678,0.005415947,0.00005075289,0.00046202418,0.000075258,0.06702291,0.000053665066,0.000024561457,0.15645322,0.75640494,0.00047135542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03691967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015207053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7530986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000104099934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000089520814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9897834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621262196","doi":"","title":"Backpedalling after Ward: The Impact of Henry v. British Columbia (Attorney General) on the Charter Damages Framework","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Damages; Supreme court; Law; Confusion; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.02311741119014229,"score_gpt":0.3059605236369586,"score_spread":0.2828431124468163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621262196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873675,0.0040160823,0.00007654416,0.0059066964,0.00029542632,0.00027021792,0.000008217651,0.00002390869,0.0020354227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905663,0.0037673009,0.000048216505,0.00029568298,0.001420006,0.000019841043,7.8296097e-7,0.000017905668,0.0038639368],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657255,0.0005724543,0.00028279237,0.00018046964,0.00068838627,0.001703316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988758,0.00027862747,0.00021576961,0.0001854153,0.0002970628,0.00014730458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033209955,0.00014236993,0.00023708088,0.00001456818,0.0012477512,0.0005586391,0.00058717857,0.00013201198,0.00030662798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069357664,0.00009437656,0.00030035267,0.00022057537,0.00044022658,0.00021248085,0.00006686996,0.0018718243,0.0000357331],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004699702,0.0007601413,0.5064377,0.000022591148,0.004491728,0.000060807957,0.20235597,0.00075153407,0.00028689546,0.09298818,0.13452455,0.056849893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016719701,0.0016949006,0.34794396,0.0004475672,0.0002575949,0.00015815072,0.1667896,0.00012979505,0.000029792183,0.4373062,0.04238036,0.0011901075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08235228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13301228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34431803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001432231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011917112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.959682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622143654","doi":"","title":"No Place Like Home: The Search for a Legal Framework for Cohabitants and the Family Home in Canada and Britain","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Law; History","score_opus":0.023173096851629438,"score_gpt":0.2993639666232105,"score_spread":0.2761908697715811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622143654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9436208,0.00033747326,0.00005065825,0.05067332,0.000108450986,0.002389517,0.00017188868,0.000024036268,0.0026238444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899766,0.001065263,0.00049604254,0.00018944728,0.00020409477,0.000023402225,0.00000559098,0.000012201748,0.008027354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969516,0.00062912656,0.00016241886,0.00037501648,0.0009395257,0.00094231934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99528664,0.003758769,0.00005297957,0.00017186532,0.0004895538,0.0002401634],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026639502,0.00015299857,0.0002798236,0.00007897782,0.0028565507,0.0001686925,0.00053425535,0.000125564,0.000024990299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077030336,0.00010602024,0.000071382194,0.00050645234,0.0017242957,0.00035295077,0.00035993624,0.00064057315,0.0000031796556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043373206,0.0002528157,0.12968193,0.00033723802,0.0005826422,0.00026184414,0.07086988,0.00013030137,0.000036765283,0.66225314,0.11975597,0.011500125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004888855,0.000222846,0.19516188,0.0001333078,0.000044520686,0.000002391123,0.27030894,0.00051615934,0.000011034168,0.0014362857,0.5267525,0.000521304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93325603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9004595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6608169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009197694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013472245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622179869","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2017.20810","title":"L’avenir de la présomption de paternité : comparaisons franco-québécoises","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.0463018400249588,"score_gpt":0.3390780308374323,"score_spread":0.2927761908124735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622179869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88943243,0.0029137884,0.0015684072,0.01485703,0.0016332908,0.00032150207,0.00011068413,0.000105356165,0.08905752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9572214,0.0018617489,0.001592391,0.00029664434,0.0021351867,0.000082637605,0.000020190866,0.000029667646,0.036760144],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742806,0.0005149399,0.0004425484,0.0004077979,0.0004633102,0.00074332627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767363,0.0008315958,0.0005544721,0.00035642786,0.00027737353,0.00030651168],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095794915,0.0002909826,0.00045742225,0.000062742896,0.0016361462,0.0006303241,0.0012184486,0.00028767536,0.0005280304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009223425,0.00034456313,0.00031594624,0.00008290143,0.001341077,0.0005416156,0.0002211477,0.0005224481,0.00049113535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057709945,0.00063911366,0.6913961,0.00023388103,0.0005282765,0.00016154618,0.040803444,0.0015437324,0.00057725736,0.22968669,0.012870191,0.021502027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054667366,0.000030921474,0.608872,0.00054544216,0.00008912523,0.00006320968,0.0016017866,0.0077296915,0.00014871667,0.013658662,0.36634696,0.00036682084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06765593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019790549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35347676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032131353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002749162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624342807","doi":"","title":"Le mariage entre personnes de même sexe","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.03541616535378129,"score_gpt":0.27643486176875676,"score_spread":0.24101869641497548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2624342807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84079695,0.007279032,0.0005465651,0.03619354,0.0015654854,0.00029340512,0.00007515024,0.00009549106,0.11315438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85626966,0.0024671706,0.0013155092,0.0004973352,0.0019805972,0.000034606313,0.000022416853,0.000020694943,0.13739203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979271,0.00025068852,0.000362209,0.0003699203,0.00046541487,0.00062464416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870145,0.00045972897,0.00020949583,0.00015009526,0.0002522979,0.00022690684],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003425651,0.00022870146,0.00036221824,0.000057318008,0.0009197975,0.00008922452,0.0005889165,0.00018227934,0.0012112795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037473053,0.00028012806,0.0002872953,0.00022933914,0.000739714,0.00035482546,0.00013886979,0.000334722,0.0007992629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042038286,0.00079915975,0.1636651,0.0001888896,0.0006837393,0.0005311184,0.18292624,0.0012571918,0.00057310046,0.5913683,0.05095482,0.0070103183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089919596,0.0000505511,0.11993073,0.0003379521,0.00008720659,0.0003200923,0.016243557,0.0075118076,0.00029379845,0.008180228,0.84547734,0.00066752516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022840792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006768304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7945225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015898328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030959194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625095744","doi":"","title":"Mother? A Portrait of Legal Motherhood in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Portrait; Genealogy; Gender studies; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; History; Art history","score_opus":0.016390112153484165,"score_gpt":0.25196781028643034,"score_spread":0.23557769813294618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625095744","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49542442,0.0007780873,0.0000011067671,0.00019886557,0.00019804724,0.00022426197,0.000020220457,0.000012142104,0.50314283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9465361,0.000615726,0.00020733611,0.000006719755,0.000024741232,3.4954078e-7,0.000016289547,0.000009980309,0.052582733],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998909,0.000089955014,0.00012861393,0.0002025279,0.00041911626,0.0002507641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923104,0.000043187894,0.00036248122,0.00012501895,0.00015726897,0.00008102324],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013225005,0.00015130549,0.00042316646,0.000023419867,0.00017731413,0.00000427513,0.00039875944,0.0001752924,0.010069787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043426164,0.0001785152,0.000115907635,0.00007317082,0.00012952107,0.00025418797,0.000028171313,0.00012984041,0.0000027936935],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036323446,0.00019070478,0.011773017,0.00036118802,0.0004524865,0.000060354072,0.91074497,0.0000083786435,0.00028789297,0.011056855,0.002715598,0.061985347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027791504,0.000023610162,0.499845,0.00008895746,0.000047783127,6.453688e-8,0.49424547,0.000003203412,0.000022450398,0.000015207456,0.005255308,0.00017504333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48807198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00152618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014287872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99083513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625641434","doi":"","title":"The Justification of Rights Infringements: Section 1 of the Charter","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Section (typography); Democracy; Law and economics; Law; Morality; Human rights; State (computer science); Politics; Proportionality (law); Interpretation (philosophy); Action (physics); Relevance (law); Sociology; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.013043046877035136,"score_gpt":0.27600258978668185,"score_spread":0.26295954290964674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625641434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98185587,0.0009472485,0.00034271157,0.0117839705,0.000845889,0.00023279361,0.0000013813504,0.0000118851685,0.003978249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944491,0.0018179634,0.0000043538425,0.00000838781,0.00030620562,0.000004409667,5.6957656e-8,0.0000024981161,0.0034070504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864984,0.00017983718,0.00019902932,0.000062449304,0.00033564316,0.0005731992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993171,0.000097742064,0.00028039966,0.00008901204,0.00019714994,0.000018597755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014700771,0.000050866187,0.000069945214,0.000012858536,0.0011600177,0.000016907357,0.00027142488,0.000036695637,0.000017476099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018277488,0.000019024948,0.00007869132,0.00011991871,0.00029330887,0.00014611759,0.000025119862,0.00025369663,0.000004661539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006443186,0.00008068669,0.012189483,0.000006741586,0.00038575128,7.030666e-8,0.017830072,0.0000037625814,0.019546857,0.8774252,0.0012654263,0.0712015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016565031,0.00036777556,0.113082826,0.00019819039,0.00020506482,0.0000110109595,0.048480377,0.000006652773,0.0104545,0.5498799,0.27531654,0.00034062477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086542143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011449282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3275453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006268925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024745302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89220357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626175647","doi":"","title":"The Answer, Not the Problem: An Examination of the Role of Aboriginal Rights in Securing a Liberal Foundation for the Legitimacy of the Canadian State","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Foundation (evidence); State (computer science); Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.016441841162745368,"score_gpt":0.3418191171153787,"score_spread":0.3253772759526333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626175647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808502,0.0002846332,0.0000011816355,0.0044584833,0.0004192863,0.0029504648,0.0000214731,0.000008158296,0.011006127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915728,0.000097521486,0.00003603816,0.000020565012,0.00010734039,0.00026406476,0.000017996505,0.000010758472,0.007872903],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981671,0.00045315342,0.0003207644,0.00016846119,0.0005917389,0.0002988114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997991,0.0005184537,0.0006406497,0.00027052374,0.000543389,0.000035983227],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011041346,0.00016121352,0.00019252687,0.000031421405,0.0021263775,0.00012105961,0.00081510184,0.000110364344,0.000018225926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014937863,0.00006212862,0.00011974408,0.00033699363,0.0005228668,0.00020856307,0.0000233416,0.00026656166,9.948096e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006264428,0.00004846675,0.001124961,0.00009985885,0.00011953368,8.099432e-8,0.8982926,0.00022647135,0.00096926105,0.07941529,0.00027925763,0.019361556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064597954,0.000096702475,0.5693075,0.00041006284,0.00021587657,2.955809e-7,0.24344811,0.0011171598,0.008966052,0.012051581,0.1633555,0.00038514726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9829546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6548445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032166578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005598235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99917275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626233521","doi":"","title":"Musings and Silences of Chief Justice William Osgoode: Digest Marginalia about the Reception of Imperial Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Knight; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Political science; Marginalia; Legal history; Art; Philosophy; Literature","score_opus":0.020617239474643282,"score_gpt":0.31439133429722055,"score_spread":0.29377409482257727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626233521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98202884,0.0026132392,0.000019071565,0.0049206554,0.0005908248,0.00017535307,0.000004453461,0.000009749268,0.00963782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798602,0.0187675,0.00004749573,0.000027712407,0.00075026386,0.000003003522,4.694324e-7,0.000006374578,0.0005370178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980947,0.00017751915,0.00026873127,0.00013606943,0.00043026812,0.0008927407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988745,0.00010898503,0.00062047876,0.00013764389,0.0002025402,0.000055886598],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020686307,0.00011648123,0.00022340429,0.000016594251,0.003202949,0.00012597597,0.00047980127,0.00008419295,0.000030956777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048458014,0.00007282928,0.000090927,0.000061362094,0.001605365,0.00045055602,0.00007610029,0.0005920484,0.0000021172143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014672871,0.00007340347,0.012497833,0.000046918096,0.00024334306,9.3413644e-7,0.03911782,0.0000056237413,0.006923371,0.927344,0.00017627097,0.013423755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034094437,0.0015039461,0.3523231,0.0005779583,0.0012968301,0.000088987814,0.21489659,0.000031648866,0.0021148513,0.37857792,0.044140972,0.0010377292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015572807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042480994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5487661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025038116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003858306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99809474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W263163414","doi":"10.1177/003172170508600918","title":"Under the Rainbow","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Phi Delta Kappan","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Sexual orientation; Law; Salary; Pension; Government (linguistics); Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.05449571599086503,"score_gpt":0.3385752982872361,"score_spread":0.2840795822963711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W263163414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4771173,0.0019481166,0.00010776958,0.31800267,0.0005976176,0.0006853235,0.000010517338,0.00036991527,0.20116077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891794,0.00014867079,0.0002461557,0.00210466,0.001189047,0.00002495895,0.0000019121953,0.000007748066,0.007097459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884665,0.0001372476,0.00012813744,0.00016102924,0.00037006513,0.000356891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946827,0.00017974089,0.000048989565,0.0001421758,0.000075253454,0.00008556997],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045250246,0.000099282195,0.00010910871,0.000012063278,0.0014579783,0.00009699481,0.00034369476,0.000059833434,0.00044821244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014963014,0.00005947302,0.000079510726,0.00019216508,0.00045220056,0.0001741447,0.00007587012,0.00014021988,0.0004222877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002943615,0.00023677664,0.0057768123,0.000013364358,0.0002945985,0.0000045834595,0.26558924,0.0007678816,0.00037235755,0.3705976,0.2362253,0.120092064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015904012,0.0000070040796,0.008486263,0.000004391885,0.000016443802,3.795253e-7,0.019248901,0.00007192848,0.000037660626,0.0014233373,0.9704087,0.00013597071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004030135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012241946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7341834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015819656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036427155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W263684723","doi":"","title":"Questions of Right and Left or Right and Wrong: A Disability-Ethics Analysis of the Right-Wing and Left-Wing Media Portrayals of the Latimer Case.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Reverence; Sociology; Praxis; Politics; Right wing; Law; Aesthetics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036299268487666486,"score_gpt":0.33842386409647124,"score_spread":0.3021245956088048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W263684723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98628175,0.00050086813,0.000014027558,0.007978841,0.00006391884,0.000329521,0.000035000736,0.000017303888,0.004778742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99873585,0.00021178692,0.00038078194,0.000074514355,0.000034946457,0.0000012687293,0.0000010881154,0.000003869133,0.00055588654],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979608,0.0005569383,0.0004842666,0.00026580022,0.0005087029,0.00022347244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731624,0.0018753071,0.00027185012,0.00023536838,0.00021177068,0.00008945044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013138283,0.00016134763,0.00050896435,0.000040971594,0.0012670472,0.000040243678,0.00018009887,0.00016381578,0.00026565976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014040113,0.00007042497,0.0001598413,0.0005105925,0.002575337,0.00022036086,0.0001182852,0.00025207712,1.3077822e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002374218,0.00019832785,0.7193738,0.00010281848,0.0010944457,0.000009656988,0.24321787,0.00005889944,0.0012353227,0.033550713,0.00015922713,0.0009751414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002586453,0.000035644473,0.97957116,0.00009909051,0.0014493131,0.000010529675,0.013136731,0.0003081992,0.0011558837,0.0027901852,0.0009809237,0.00020371685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014821308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13722734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2601973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005350825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000063227955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9917391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W264711944","doi":"","title":"Rolle's Ego Dormio in Manuscript Trinity College Dublin 155 (1). (Linguistics)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia Anglica Posnaniensia: international review of English Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Extant taxon; Id, ego and super-ego; Classics; Watson; Biography; Quarter (Canadian coin); History; Art; Literature; Philosophy; Art history; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03775751814888563,"score_gpt":0.3540115424552449,"score_spread":0.3162540243063593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W264711944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08517161,0.1599276,5.2550416e-7,0.00808218,0.006061925,0.0022556765,0.00033281048,0.00020956581,0.7379581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70462507,0.2892359,0.0003033147,0.000897032,0.001806207,0.00019071148,0.000021041278,0.000022375832,0.0028983692],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955576,0.0005275341,0.0013047988,0.0006185496,0.0013373069,0.00065420376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99281853,0.0009810682,0.00041706144,0.00030932412,0.0053205295,0.00015349245],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020564678,0.00042694164,0.0013143779,0.00015530743,0.00064059923,0.000040839783,0.0007848142,0.00013454723,0.00068960845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04147023,0.00035215414,0.00039144687,0.0009072563,0.0008421706,0.0002341884,0.00030697795,0.0004137497,0.00007558748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032031976,0.0016868568,0.020719115,0.0033861375,0.003182095,0.00030288103,0.12246738,0.000028444041,0.000009205052,0.38041258,0.45509797,0.012387027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001144368,0.00009265923,0.013117038,0.0028823146,0.00014372054,0.0000011959979,0.023472594,0.0000034488928,0.00000990811,0.0007518645,0.95794564,0.00043527113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010247747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003826287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73505974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066696183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018566818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2651661903","doi":"10.1515/9782763712680-005","title":"Question Identitaire. Le Droit et la Philosophiejuridique Libérale: Réflexion Sur le Fond du Droit Autochtone Canadien","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02579775297448438,"score_gpt":0.27678467441378884,"score_spread":0.25098692143930446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2651661903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025475787,0.0015195288,0.00011556519,0.05718284,0.0010016069,0.0013563556,0.00013514156,0.00047540854,0.9127378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6431047,0.0056109824,0.0003905826,0.0006998664,0.0013003185,0.00007750684,0.00012930093,0.000109301145,0.34857744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994869,0.0005963676,0.0010316609,0.0012278445,0.001189779,0.0010853632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974078,0.00046655943,0.0005741464,0.00045387947,0.0004953465,0.00060227176],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013486074,0.0009680891,0.0011596269,0.00018312583,0.0021454305,0.00036045586,0.00080809265,0.0013591738,0.0029402985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025850273,0.0010220006,0.000625221,0.00026119972,0.0023035535,0.001564763,0.00027972058,0.001079398,0.0010043912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039656014,0.00014896505,0.0001939554,0.000075804746,0.00030356445,0.00013529265,0.003492178,0.000077623765,0.000029132805,0.98807603,0.001659721,0.0057681003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010067719,0.00023457201,0.004160673,0.0006605181,0.0002681341,0.000047080663,0.00087386306,0.00016271767,0.0000634408,0.51546526,0.47525138,0.0018056132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72849023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6023588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61762893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021612481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001580459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W265248637","doi":"","title":"An opportunity for grace in the Anglican Communion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Sociology; Commit; Constructive; Polity; Law; CONTEST; Theology; Philosophy; Process (computing); Political science; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.13395966542412793,"score_gpt":0.42322621680747435,"score_spread":0.28926655138334645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W265248637","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30371505,0.12963562,0.00011615529,0.41022694,0.0001823749,0.007939345,0.00005541073,0.00044254088,0.14768657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92450136,0.052883208,0.0005324819,0.021184191,0.00024265816,0.00034215223,0.000019694342,0.0000063480884,0.00028790586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693376,0.0018566304,0.00029664394,0.00022177404,0.00028092228,0.0004102877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998347,0.00091107114,0.0001286208,0.00034585048,0.00010847086,0.00015899826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039406023,0.00014675542,0.0003635774,0.000013816119,0.0007376546,0.000042089767,0.00091386464,0.00009255682,0.00045268182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024963384,0.00007720251,0.00016039635,0.0003278155,0.0006641798,0.00017756195,0.000068678666,0.00025270932,0.000022710945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027407885,0.0006237877,0.003946049,0.00018484952,0.000026617214,0.000010082755,0.02040181,0.0000020776874,0.000018297626,0.5488334,0.027893463,0.39803216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001510331,0.00014147155,0.012139967,0.00017157476,0.000025970494,0.000001857358,0.0059783477,0.000011060033,0.0000020987009,0.005099345,0.97610265,0.00017464023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012251505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006494547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94820917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102476086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042720236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56735176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W265832125","doi":"","title":"\"Fourth\" Guessing the Spirit: Critical Reflections on Contemporary Global Anglicanism from an Indigenous Laywoman","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humility; Worship; Indigenous; Faith; Sociology; Identity (music); Religious studies; Ecclesiology; Theology; Law; Political science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.18138572626061966,"score_gpt":0.4578406157499846,"score_spread":0.2764548894893649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W265832125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38668147,0.13220248,0.00015729437,0.12716335,0.00078660075,0.0027206969,0.00020073705,0.0010088616,0.3490785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9609432,0.01566969,0.00038082144,0.021915682,0.0007247148,0.000110654226,0.000019046285,0.000011790005,0.00022438329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621654,0.0016437602,0.0004340195,0.00052569475,0.00057960016,0.0006004085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979578,0.00094115577,0.00015327142,0.00041665553,0.00019369111,0.0003374222],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008681469,0.00027691867,0.00057211384,0.000013316573,0.0034365188,0.000080180485,0.00072488934,0.00018750037,0.0007556077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003034586,0.0001547979,0.000268675,0.0005018424,0.002666774,0.00022634583,0.00014124015,0.00042928525,0.00019739925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010106204,0.0013481141,0.02063645,0.00013570658,0.00026207135,0.00068125257,0.041198302,0.0000021609192,0.00006629605,0.8466731,0.040099908,0.048795618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041966978,0.00086449756,0.11131103,0.0010361486,0.00018167582,0.000045744768,0.0084509775,0.0000040152445,0.000017338667,0.042057533,0.83469087,0.0009204742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074518127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023233865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8046155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026176995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016656826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99915767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W265884658","doi":"","title":"Review Article: The Charter and Poverty: Beyond Injusticiability","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Charter; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Political science; Adjudication; Law; Law and economics; Legitimacy; Poverty; Human rights; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.015715691362669742,"score_gpt":0.3050559447937341,"score_spread":0.28934025343106434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W265884658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5441966,0.23612116,0.00011951814,0.2059788,0.0003854617,0.000717854,0.0000019671977,0.000069096735,0.012409521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70663357,0.28758276,0.0000090645435,0.0040790252,0.00044336767,0.0000080433265,2.61333e-7,0.0000056442414,0.0012382884],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747974,0.00032969238,0.00021868575,0.00014954683,0.0003255428,0.0014967972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994245,0.00013983758,0.000103615865,0.000105635794,0.00012789188,0.00009847929],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034184253,0.0001104028,0.0001766381,0.000011364842,0.0014781049,0.00008786812,0.00022505606,0.000049405942,0.00013247167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064886693,0.00006291383,0.00008096541,0.0002144695,0.00030365025,0.00024018018,0.000049205264,0.0009763714,0.00003584937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011066564,0.00024744176,0.062179346,0.00014064329,0.00060026767,0.000010984898,0.028397452,0.0000019478518,0.00023871506,0.4222316,0.032210615,0.4536303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069364754,0.00027649687,0.025541369,0.00026704674,0.0003243073,0.00020454796,0.037565567,0.00002038022,0.0000101316045,0.26299402,0.6716391,0.00046341962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074561354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009102365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63942844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006617675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039494052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W266230057","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1221","title":"Law and Feminism: Foreword","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03239107060682715,"score_gpt":0.3214021946588765,"score_spread":0.2890111240520493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W266230057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011707279,0.0009558928,0.00018408394,0.0044688536,0.00046233344,0.00011643489,0.0000020727857,0.000051982526,0.9820511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99400103,0.00038687373,0.0022086822,0.0016894739,0.0009470563,0.0000017492814,5.731952e-7,0.000010766878,0.0007537895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984539,0.00009265727,0.00026020774,0.00015815793,0.0004823078,0.0005527439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913204,0.00018777828,0.00013119042,0.00007253732,0.00013809142,0.0003383898],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001457872,0.00013174498,0.00018927027,0.000017932287,0.0033130955,0.0002672616,0.00020261282,0.00012861023,0.00013991227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009091732,0.000101758036,0.00008821361,0.00009441699,0.00073525525,0.0003582795,0.00006937278,0.00036995247,0.000029319239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014239859,0.00002449463,0.0012420091,0.0000039632664,0.00003613405,0.000045400815,0.011561628,6.467892e-7,0.0000767135,0.9819701,0.0010281663,0.003996517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010115055,0.00012394239,0.007446375,0.000082548,0.00007080584,0.00013297432,0.035969526,0.0000044188164,0.00041652986,0.15076697,0.8034602,0.00051423354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07255104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50683856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9822938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015067961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017149176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99798447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2724249194","doi":"","title":"Written Brief on Bill C-337, an Act to Amend the Judges Act and the Criminal Code (Sexual Assault). Submitted to the Status of Women Committee of the House of Commons, Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Criminal code; House of Representatives; Sexual assault; Law; Code (set theory); Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Criminal law; Medicine; Legislature; Computer science; Parliament; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Environmental health; Politics; Programming language","score_opus":0.02569968436546979,"score_gpt":0.300956659327963,"score_spread":0.27525697496249324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2724249194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9440219,0.00049608067,0.0000030545373,0.054287106,0.0001459096,0.00056440936,0.000055543034,0.000006998391,0.00041903643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978795,0.0008755233,0.0000072352323,0.0006854622,0.00017042099,0.00001816553,5.911629e-7,0.000017035825,0.00034608002],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953017,0.001072283,0.00040368404,0.0001890665,0.0010786494,0.0019545841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751824,0.0007164413,0.0006350545,0.0005974055,0.00031594842,0.00021693684],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004383876,0.00020141542,0.00041634898,0.000026124897,0.0031697373,0.00015028319,0.0016338443,0.00006907488,0.000012118396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017014289,0.00007588892,0.00009313236,0.00017177721,0.0012709063,0.00015061063,0.00026983442,0.0012252028,6.8317684e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002847568,0.0005002537,0.3607922,0.00004986891,0.002406438,0.0000059559966,0.46837476,0.00036830676,0.0013040918,0.08282984,0.019264922,0.0612558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015877,0.0008698,0.6385848,0.00004372801,0.00017916098,0.000013072143,0.3164342,0.000016401107,0.00034592772,0.0029676175,0.038701512,0.0002560994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80119896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97415453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27779257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017606019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026220395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W272733908","doi":"","title":"What's Wrong with Social and Economic Rights?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Social rights; Constitution; Human rights; Political science; Democracy; Law and economics; Judicial restraint; Law; Judicial review; Judicial activism; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.011028038115456563,"score_gpt":0.2736194586194604,"score_spread":0.26259142050400386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W272733908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97649026,0.0028168615,0.000008934372,0.00798256,0.00015517423,0.00012126049,6.841159e-7,0.00003627032,0.012388012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97538555,0.013860785,0.000026475944,0.00006841153,0.0010202357,0.000004349792,5.3957297e-7,0.000008781879,0.009624852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773675,0.00012872324,0.00014809745,0.00016753927,0.00021530718,0.0016035868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971545,0.000038415215,0.000078200144,0.000040228057,0.00003540566,0.00009232026],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082848454,0.00012520493,0.00017024577,0.00002223122,0.0024606946,0.00039249487,0.00016640773,0.000075766526,0.00046516638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007143594,0.000088015324,0.000058542293,0.00006375102,0.0003618869,0.0010135557,0.000013854032,0.0007578707,0.00007735534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024548685,0.00008471015,0.0072130794,0.000006090043,0.00079115335,0.000013895605,0.07938436,0.0000363985,0.000021544722,0.6739109,0.0013660532,0.23692629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002991399,0.0006152198,0.021894211,0.000063546584,0.00020341406,0.0002239658,0.20665656,0.000028297898,0.000025638423,0.27041948,0.4957985,0.0010797667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056479475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.104715616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49443245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014412038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000643218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99883795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2728765329","doi":"","title":"Reimagining the White Wedding: Lesbian Weddings in Ontario, Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Lesbian; Art; Gender studies; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.023810073760488215,"score_gpt":0.26683335174770656,"score_spread":0.24302327798721834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2728765329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26879022,0.000032092375,0.000018960809,0.08983483,0.0006118682,0.00022985814,6.2588254e-7,0.00006403649,0.6404175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95114434,0.000005372569,0.00026369756,0.001324315,0.00014185265,0.000012502604,8.805826e-7,0.0000056331364,0.047101427],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986202,0.00015040391,0.00017693797,0.00019741077,0.0004207597,0.00043428445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994945,0.00018141516,0.000058908463,0.00011372612,0.00006289102,0.00008859574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007676211,0.000110051726,0.00015257642,0.00001617639,0.0009526837,0.00011249166,0.00032818483,0.000045222972,0.00090137904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038118786,0.00006112833,0.000036969417,0.00018471706,0.00020149535,0.00016409355,0.000081847895,0.0003297443,0.000017504044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005416773,0.0000137237,0.7218917,0.000003883763,0.00002384164,0.000004521824,0.13646998,0.00005857009,0.000028650427,0.040897865,0.09703824,0.0035636316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010077861,0.0000050775643,0.17010482,0.000013643662,0.000004745592,2.1943072e-7,0.03246477,0.000067843874,0.00000881982,0.0002508884,0.7968447,0.00013370537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69980645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011633429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044192447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9869468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W272909804","doi":"","title":"Quality v. equality: the divided court in Chaoulli v. Quebec.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Legislation; Jurisdiction","score_opus":0.08115706378064698,"score_gpt":0.3317319427195077,"score_spread":0.2505748789388607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W272909804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8213333,0.00079800555,0.000023415854,0.07761056,0.00052097597,0.0016361858,0.000013025022,0.00017243421,0.09789211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839441,0.00006137769,0.000018727911,0.00046392457,0.00049915834,0.0010252793,0.0000039307156,0.0000067043093,0.01397678],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735487,0.00078691414,0.00034490696,0.00023800445,0.00061115384,0.0006641783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905884,0.0004818904,0.000125217,0.00017554,0.00008040571,0.000078113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033253236,0.00012538659,0.00022416776,0.000022728344,0.0007114249,0.00014277865,0.0003489499,0.00009882922,0.000042969696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008620776,0.000081238955,0.000095309595,0.00035012155,0.0005575844,0.00020894186,0.00009635961,0.00018121733,0.000032109343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032597192,0.00027077363,0.53765035,0.000027353439,0.00006173781,0.000005888425,0.037620142,0.000026819942,0.00001525314,0.28972828,0.029816262,0.10474455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019640499,0.0000010388819,0.8408591,0.0000022463191,0.000005124577,4.9565607e-8,0.0039660875,0.0000013208441,0.00001253665,0.0033335767,0.15149994,0.00012254594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65300304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7142308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30320877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004751215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038711296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54717773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2731244347","doi":"","title":"Like a Prayer: Administrative Law Implications of the Supreme Court's Freedom of Religion Decision in Saguenay","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Tribunal; Political science; Jurisdiction; Statute; Statutory law; Duty; Neutrality; High Court; Common law; Judicial review","score_opus":0.035823379433521214,"score_gpt":0.3394314810840748,"score_spread":0.3036081016505536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2731244347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96997863,0.0034040066,0.00037568362,0.012248359,0.0002848985,0.00046646252,0.000007397858,0.000015997317,0.013218566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975556,0.0018253936,0.0001579467,0.000041709707,0.0001038949,0.0000064312453,6.66178e-7,0.000006273682,0.00030209133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791664,0.0002701924,0.0003879685,0.00012658589,0.0005115538,0.0007870342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882543,0.00018431991,0.00035549398,0.00014263115,0.00041046616,0.00008167431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020086302,0.00009664148,0.00020523634,0.00003312538,0.0003852572,0.000026595455,0.0004539104,0.00008958794,0.0000054310035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057435094,0.00006197947,0.00011902054,0.00035332172,0.00045956366,0.00021096898,0.00006420785,0.00068515673,0.0000032906512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012664663,0.00020951335,0.031557154,0.000004454092,0.00010790659,5.839983e-7,0.02764347,0.00013487432,0.0008079743,0.9345883,0.0021241351,0.0026949819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023365482,0.00080163794,0.05865957,0.00020391961,0.00010423777,0.000043797292,0.09125427,0.000027399436,0.00061042304,0.8088178,0.03677591,0.00036448936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015484024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26736888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25188488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001137244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018064601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99107194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2731542888","doi":"","title":"Her Excellency the Right Honourable Michaëlle Jean Address to the Canadian Judicial Council","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.057820193180389154,"score_gpt":0.292121135649175,"score_spread":0.23430094246878586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2731542888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027411902,0.00036765303,0.0000065218373,0.1971928,0.0013165355,0.000721614,0.000013958136,0.00007209833,0.7728969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9059982,0.000060277747,0.000056564684,0.005162532,0.0021356996,0.000048823385,7.51084e-7,0.000009601828,0.08652758],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782306,0.00020652867,0.0001612321,0.00024445716,0.0008615098,0.000703218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853283,0.00021705337,0.00004634639,0.00024696306,0.00066945126,0.00028736072],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013719233,0.00014329668,0.0001428052,0.000015977757,0.008088153,0.00024944975,0.0007518391,0.000097171585,0.005134873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075629115,0.00006665668,0.00007319726,0.00036073895,0.0008602171,0.00012023587,0.00009149124,0.00016899274,0.00221762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065570534,0.0000148636045,0.00063193287,0.0000012905532,0.00004144591,0.0000025190375,0.11582755,0.000004655698,0.00001719324,0.01712838,0.8651217,0.0012018721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079709585,0.000027173417,0.0029642452,0.0000067690567,0.000014134806,2.1614981e-7,0.016039228,0.000012063268,0.00004644133,0.00040469583,0.9802607,0.00014459556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9701792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8785863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011600374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000874635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2732675681","doi":"10.17118/11143/10278","title":"Les trente premières années de la Charte canadienne en droit de la famille","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.011576309337373148,"score_gpt":0.23791459240995033,"score_spread":0.2263382830725772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2732675681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7692135,0.009485588,0.000115764786,0.0016105333,0.00030897578,0.00024527306,0.00007078055,0.000113855574,0.21883576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87723535,0.006491807,0.00070902763,0.00011651689,0.0009240257,0.000010650914,0.0000115497705,0.000042584423,0.114458464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961169,0.0011039614,0.0002509182,0.00039698268,0.00024609055,0.0018851535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765706,0.0009204249,0.00017407472,0.00023940616,0.00008434781,0.00092469883],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014817654,0.0003686579,0.00045927602,0.00009494371,0.0015477674,0.00009944446,0.00062158116,0.0007054653,0.00044956285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029356376,0.00044865484,0.0003218689,0.00039229865,0.0011890442,0.00046074565,0.0002505553,0.0006202602,0.0000846279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090472015,0.0003246708,0.24419653,0.0005277511,0.0005706862,0.0003728461,0.26313904,0.00042402837,0.003203541,0.45618418,0.005106006,0.025860272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006752278,0.000060464,0.2021819,0.00041882473,0.00036342608,0.000112670365,0.02499624,0.00033452027,0.00050232385,0.0016236098,0.76814246,0.00058835174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20227244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11389169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76303643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0142243495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024246173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2732852429","doi":"10.11575/prism/34270","title":"Alberta First Nations Consultation &amp; Accommodation Handbook","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada; University of Calgary","keywords":"Accommodation; Political science; Foundation (evidence); Library science; Sociology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.019032624466594514,"score_gpt":0.24459034093909018,"score_spread":0.22555771647249567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2732852429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19078423,0.0002102318,0.26236248,0.021827932,0.00036671766,0.0008874816,0.0000014193746,0.00018204203,0.5233775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9135257,0.0005086891,0.03825306,0.00008641411,0.00005801969,0.0000017077263,0.000052352465,0.000008140523,0.047505926],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999299,0.00011334107,0.000077826546,0.00013109084,0.00024060153,0.00013814149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989432,0.00062431,0.00011278333,0.000086893146,0.00016549634,0.0000673118],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019134846,0.00006365617,0.00011767622,0.0000577207,0.0016606606,0.00001905442,0.00018615017,0.00008247606,0.00024451848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088014296,0.00007246576,0.000057745397,0.00017198233,0.00033657983,0.00025891126,0.000058372338,0.00006888527,0.00012603715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097761,0.00029496138,0.022973096,0.000118761294,0.00024224985,0.0000017200853,0.50805324,0.000025506932,0.0005850558,0.21715288,0.030568566,0.2198862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006371776,0.000019611225,0.028624754,0.000038251772,0.00004671525,1.1771776e-7,0.002046211,0.001699278,0.00002055504,0.00076256593,0.9659484,0.00015633175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07031854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12605679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93537986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011247321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033629713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2733248958","doi":"","title":"Subsistence or Sale?: An Analysis of Historical Questions Raised in R v. Gladstone","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Subsistence agriculture; Legislation; Supreme court; CLARITY; Spawn (biology); Indigenous rights; Whaling; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Fur trade; Fishing; Fishery; Geography; History; Economy; Archaeology; Economic history; Economics; Agriculture; Ecology","score_opus":0.08675257952076508,"score_gpt":0.3913517977895716,"score_spread":0.3045992182688065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2733248958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9460592,0.00013977826,0.000091195296,0.004671665,0.0002103815,0.00019530453,0.0000069801786,0.00006345936,0.048562035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904389,0.00009830664,0.0009856538,0.000029039511,0.000053875818,0.000013509858,0.0000018251351,0.0000028193263,0.008376079],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889517,0.00014329124,0.0002295769,0.00019925782,0.00032239693,0.00021032279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991682,0.00013857086,0.00015688674,0.00028127883,0.0001503375,0.00010470194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046301945,0.00007859066,0.00032134284,0.00008558469,0.000930024,0.000056410976,0.00042481575,0.00007825774,0.0005005689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014893805,0.000054940872,0.00011203761,0.0004020837,0.00043871388,0.00034899366,0.00005869846,0.00007627774,0.0000059759536],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006816751,0.00040708986,0.91959774,0.000011167678,0.00031000143,0.000013956185,0.036677927,0.00007391953,0.00049671077,0.03882126,0.0005393949,0.0029826346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017954255,0.000027775406,0.98628336,0.000007778413,0.0001394494,4.7394856e-8,0.0063162977,0.00025027688,0.000020397203,0.000059954556,0.006599058,0.00011606951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21767364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5612517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34357807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065447006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006502792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7875359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737015095","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3001258","title":"Business Corporations as Religious Freedom Claimants in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Religious freedom; Business; Freedom of contract; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economic freedom; Sociology","score_opus":0.017481206146859357,"score_gpt":0.2877028470214596,"score_spread":0.2702216408746002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737015095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96892905,0.0016623705,0.000036788595,0.019153506,0.0007874003,0.00018072245,0.0000035337077,0.000014716476,0.009231915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880709,0.009324691,0.000027642007,0.00008696639,0.00042661602,0.000006391702,0.0000014279398,0.000008958229,0.0020463848],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972562,0.00010664666,0.00023637981,0.00015760725,0.00049753126,0.0017456074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990974,0.000052710337,0.0003109305,0.0001664135,0.00026330887,0.00010922965],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096264627,0.00011979926,0.00018819814,0.00003280146,0.0031659578,0.00023226897,0.00062285195,0.00006362501,0.000029710898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088537537,0.00010143948,0.000044861412,0.00013787522,0.00022351822,0.0004058182,0.00006259686,0.000987906,0.000028741284],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007198287,0.00010301241,0.804209,0.000008446003,0.0002581407,0.0001458663,0.0106084095,0.00035227725,0.000063815474,0.15758799,0.009401963,0.017189108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017889066,0.00008437856,0.61621284,0.00008893801,0.000056547517,0.00011519209,0.08948177,0.00005313724,0.000012949833,0.25472707,0.036664516,0.00071375456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99980533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18799613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006767449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01750536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737595584","doi":"","title":"Liberty Rights, the Family and Constitutional Politics","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Political science; Sociology; Law; Charter; Politics; Humanities; Family law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.041895456404184336,"score_gpt":0.29038305600300246,"score_spread":0.2484875995988181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737595584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34365594,0.0132312495,0.0036919706,0.03603921,0.0017381223,0.0013602905,0.00007905102,0.00046889452,0.59973526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99356693,0.0025508432,0.0005328911,0.00048840925,0.000716433,0.000031061383,0.0000074554105,0.0000038130197,0.0021021885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998607,0.0001580934,0.00025412487,0.0002728716,0.0002990843,0.0004088162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897945,0.00042934963,0.000085536616,0.00015491931,0.00019281698,0.00015790222],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003586503,0.00017561564,0.00020808275,0.00003518679,0.0043324335,0.00017369057,0.00025199173,0.00012008115,0.000109593275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037872538,0.00011540321,0.00008908928,0.00023243902,0.014507106,0.00026729796,0.00009741424,0.00018845183,0.000080413665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042627075,0.00003566997,0.004839559,0.000007895939,0.000050531682,0.000014708803,0.0034748625,0.000029287865,0.000033491153,0.9894048,0.0017573057,0.00034764557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026737357,0.000011159706,0.0047199214,0.000064289845,0.00005214806,0.00004070463,0.0071393773,0.000036595287,0.000009320557,0.010568962,0.9768634,0.00022677903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026069786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014617459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9788358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019266894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025761753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739314990","doi":"10.1080/00131857.2017.1303227","title":"Aborigine, Indian, Indigenous or first nations?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Philosophy and Theory","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sociology; Anthropology; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.03718675231864702,"score_gpt":0.34644253863456,"score_spread":0.30925578631591294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2739314990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35640657,0.001569689,0.0000057648863,0.1208984,0.0018240476,0.00060177577,0.000053728527,0.00006865843,0.5185714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897563,0.0005742864,0.00015451864,0.00027458742,0.0021620835,0.000060163784,0.000008653975,0.000006180057,0.0070032696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992446,0.000074460695,0.000108396605,0.00017240546,0.0002183516,0.0001818364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988204,0.00067681045,0.00011691822,0.00015329212,0.00012390279,0.000108628185],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003801605,0.00009376163,0.00009828151,0.00004719817,0.008434745,0.00020023211,0.00028638967,0.00006735701,0.00050616136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015619973,0.0000717793,0.000035644833,0.00007476277,0.00076140324,0.00037727747,0.000047833157,0.00009819234,0.00009822908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001712308,0.00006718353,0.00783891,0.000015537884,0.00003274877,0.0000012011869,0.039816108,4.005611e-7,6.129516e-7,0.9507152,0.00047380233,0.0010212014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019171769,0.000018255841,0.15714921,0.00003755319,0.000014125599,0.0000017123972,0.0030525832,1.5579397e-7,0.0000049398773,0.70802987,0.13132897,0.00017089317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001148027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003005365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63334966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008908086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025642538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99285614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740470807","doi":"","title":"Canada's Charter of Rights: Paradigm Lost?","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Originalism; Context (archaeology); Normative; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.022380810603533505,"score_gpt":0.23549237382532268,"score_spread":0.21311156322178917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740470807","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2622255,0.03315059,0.000018508734,0.09366351,0.0013822599,0.00040607428,0.00016257114,0.000029705296,0.6089613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8794065,0.0024916953,0.00025428867,0.000052229738,0.00011475502,8.835807e-8,0.0000015325622,0.000004889204,0.11767401],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855286,0.00016079088,0.00012695887,0.00023767125,0.00051174336,0.0004099895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991257,0.00009644229,0.0002574643,0.00018781605,0.0001414195,0.00019115701],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000112019305,0.00017345739,0.00040878734,0.000010458307,0.0005538536,0.0000075625653,0.00040725202,0.00015613143,0.08792104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019619049,0.00019355021,0.00016037535,0.00010990471,0.0010686055,0.0005386503,0.00010415592,0.000110830784,0.00009510479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006954489,0.0005097656,0.0031113385,0.00027008055,0.00093608507,0.00010507465,0.5299441,0.000021233878,0.0001852712,0.06544668,0.3564065,0.042994294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075951824,0.00013983753,0.11003711,0.00014545696,0.00022427333,0.0000011808563,0.07906784,0.0003094217,0.0000370452,0.0000996597,0.80875826,0.0004203693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.617181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013983886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000111138026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9129127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741567171","doi":"","title":"Citizen Supplicants?: Alain Carins' Citizens Plus and the Politics of Aboriginal/Constitutional Scholarship","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Politics; Scholarship; Humanities; Political science; Context (archaeology); Elaboration; Sociology; Ethnology; Law; Philosophy; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03733390591740756,"score_gpt":0.29782038788227494,"score_spread":0.2604864819648674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741567171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6676784,0.017018707,0.0010953735,0.03145675,0.0010396991,0.002335286,0.00039237054,0.00032811047,0.2786553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993283,0.003918072,0.00072139915,0.00020186217,0.00043748587,0.00005533049,0.000007773245,0.0000067968354,0.0013682853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980475,0.00029639853,0.00042186282,0.00032418166,0.0004446935,0.000465366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983362,0.0007609973,0.00018247003,0.00021988468,0.00032049837,0.00017996177],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007019262,0.0002195345,0.0004336342,0.000065065586,0.0024093809,0.00012980889,0.0003649453,0.00015210806,0.00026863726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009591637,0.00016346438,0.00015945065,0.0003109701,0.01482364,0.0002432395,0.00009349606,0.00028394847,0.000037211135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014572095,0.00003520977,0.0062333867,0.00003903373,0.000098857745,0.00000793916,0.008704924,0.000063885556,0.00004199861,0.9840388,0.0004891717,0.00023227594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009409271,0.00009049345,0.015694618,0.00086522236,0.0007171149,0.00016996336,0.048772387,0.00092012604,0.00034498153,0.042323805,0.87909454,0.0015974805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002036576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009693402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94171494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031709418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027898542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742267879","doi":"","title":"The Purpose of Canadian Equality Rights","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Fundamental rights; Identity (music); Sociology; Ethnology; Law; Human rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07338972501701502,"score_gpt":0.29192099156510964,"score_spread":0.21853126654809463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742267879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11601681,0.0071211187,0.000054887183,0.022616705,0.0011338997,0.00094047165,0.000058313646,0.0001296166,0.8519282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949823,0.001907496,0.00018851181,0.000056464556,0.00021848762,0.000021771164,0.0000019395973,0.0000030557783,0.0026199701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987254,0.00019791184,0.00027765136,0.00017520675,0.00024283762,0.00038098145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989726,0.00033012225,0.000110610235,0.0001846561,0.00020673004,0.00019526965],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050271064,0.00011307241,0.00018188225,0.0000718942,0.0035248161,0.00008233147,0.0003421941,0.00009416003,0.00026775934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057100214,0.000076861346,0.0001066629,0.0004758571,0.0021577845,0.0001518291,0.000037060294,0.00011700472,0.00011582788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017297994,0.00002477961,0.0012527788,0.000009817588,0.000038576094,0.0000035952944,0.0097292485,0.000018700208,0.00002285476,0.9851807,0.0024407033,0.0012765593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001206201,0.00000915866,0.0012433114,0.000043527383,0.000022158467,0.0000016459448,0.0056010913,0.000031407188,0.000057411333,0.0017476756,0.9909813,0.0001407258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42341885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85820526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9885406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026673902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013174234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99777246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743247351","doi":"","title":"Capturing Proceeds from Criminal Notoriety: A Case Study","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Parliament; Law; Legislation; Political science; Mandate; Criminal law; Legislature; Cabinet (room); Constitution; History; Politics","score_opus":0.06359759635595999,"score_gpt":0.30414136980302,"score_spread":0.24054377344706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743247351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9640125,0.012297738,0.00011836373,0.005923286,0.0031257314,0.0024589396,0.00004793153,0.00021199271,0.011803508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908472,0.00071702566,0.0015475218,0.00014350326,0.0025823987,0.00039964344,0.000009183014,0.000025914564,0.003727632],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967409,0.00035085902,0.0007121238,0.00081442855,0.0005326946,0.0008490382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979368,0.0004371512,0.00029411708,0.00032002127,0.00060625013,0.0004056492],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038609782,0.0005368922,0.000664845,0.00006522153,0.0028479097,0.0005019737,0.0004336807,0.0003214758,0.0014016359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052415894,0.0005024758,0.00026424642,0.00053881103,0.0026228717,0.0011252965,0.00029112582,0.00051530363,0.0011114497],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031657328,0.0027788524,0.063463815,0.00053729984,0.0015529776,0.004663839,0.66572165,0.00031239237,0.00028357323,0.23761979,0.0035147376,0.019519428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001199128,0.00019110747,0.0059649274,0.000581756,0.0010243552,0.000534765,0.9179755,0.0003729032,0.00005102693,0.0008775837,0.07012985,0.0010971352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29292023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033040334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25987992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008393928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003248354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744466085","doi":"","title":"Fake It Till You Make it: Policymaking and Assisted Human Reproduction in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Reimbursement; Legitimacy; Reproduction; Business; Government (linguistics); Action (physics); Law; Political science; Public administration; Health care; Politics","score_opus":0.03434679643321485,"score_gpt":0.30541404123796767,"score_spread":0.2710672448047528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744466085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8910174,0.00021801953,0.0000021386215,0.018970883,0.00049267896,0.00031120342,0.000007956309,0.000070747155,0.08890898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99279284,0.0000416232,0.00014315468,0.0014091738,0.00073163974,0.000024287374,0.0000054363595,0.000013059536,0.0048387568],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979438,0.00029027756,0.00031673047,0.00047904722,0.00047723917,0.0004928595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992247,0.00009018386,0.00013924611,0.00024683887,0.00010688764,0.00019214205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081178214,0.00016943569,0.00026847245,0.000032198048,0.0011980613,0.00013866073,0.00020526249,0.00009909645,0.00013581148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087330147,0.00015540757,0.000042666416,0.00027087744,0.00024907256,0.00018855782,0.00009839091,0.0002784458,0.000021865082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007536094,0.0002372176,0.48278433,0.0002558682,0.00027322868,0.00006989584,0.07753493,0.0001702727,0.004972415,0.30662382,0.058824614,0.068178035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003829608,0.000020143318,0.2556765,0.0000683052,0.00001653635,0.0000020485923,0.009681312,0.0000136780845,0.000091729016,0.00051811064,0.73322266,0.00030603894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98801214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.674398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009877867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017907635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92146397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2746322026","doi":"","title":"Legal Modesty and Political Boldness: The Supreme Court of Canada's Decision in Chaoulli V. Quebec","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Victory; Law; Politics; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Health care; Dispose pattern; Majority opinion; Supreme Court Decisions; Sociology","score_opus":0.019684977224863873,"score_gpt":0.2691515264457322,"score_spread":0.24946654922086833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2746322026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94780296,0.0016609613,0.0003530044,0.014482705,0.00030458512,0.0004818438,0.000036037058,0.000035066143,0.034842808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99890196,0.00012440169,0.00024058977,0.000073742056,0.00020031529,0.000017077156,0.0000036192728,0.0000043458367,0.00043397048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856573,0.00012512904,0.00033014503,0.00021600771,0.00035367347,0.0004093013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907595,0.00048373375,0.00007918115,0.0001241312,0.00014484889,0.00009214594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040606948,0.00013435881,0.00025322507,0.000033284723,0.00075104367,0.00006423807,0.00020291399,0.000091274225,0.000022958977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000508619,0.00009576106,0.000049831746,0.0001931436,0.0016242126,0.00016677861,0.00007612045,0.00014031952,0.00000144668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010584458,0.00004334571,0.015107343,0.000017426442,0.000011191704,0.0000098530045,0.0010154225,0.0003635586,0.000049571354,0.98245907,0.0006185107,0.0002940984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020723501,0.000053930686,0.41783884,0.0009250485,0.00013371432,0.000037038,0.07398497,0.0021197214,0.00043437476,0.019631581,0.4816186,0.0011498111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9702054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99494267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9628275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005381348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095192774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5984479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2746993430","doi":"","title":"A Monkey in the Middle: Reflections on Darwin the Macaque and the (R)evolution of Wild Animals in Canadian Common Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Macaque; Darwin (ADL); Law; Political science; Biology; Ecology; Computer science","score_opus":0.10889143283905599,"score_gpt":0.3557957030392611,"score_spread":0.2469042702002051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2746993430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.578736,0.0004481713,7.243259e-7,0.06542257,0.00006963865,0.0006260142,0.000005735354,0.000011010226,0.35468015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855566,0.000053044383,0.000017175269,0.00096404203,0.000050495317,0.000047095764,4.8735046e-7,0.0000025919053,0.0003093944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985226,0.000721133,0.00015625908,0.000103681814,0.0002507692,0.0002456057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932486,0.0003994468,0.00004552761,0.00011527703,0.00005199627,0.00006289816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015004635,0.00007085006,0.0001238112,0.000030259436,0.0006831992,0.000051096522,0.00024536168,0.000060810515,0.000013718655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031529096,0.0000297551,0.000027116863,0.00042783417,0.0008409089,0.000078939964,0.000029759376,0.00019693165,0.0000044927424],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028426008,0.000019545692,0.0120129585,0.0000017916171,0.000008441101,8.068137e-7,0.16573739,0.000030206513,0.000007870882,0.8200132,0.0020018795,0.00013746678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001305571,0.0001047307,0.17308584,0.000053705637,0.000024459152,0.0000019280412,0.7139363,0.00021604815,0.000021822301,0.029247321,0.081810504,0.00019177071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99229354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7907659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005810303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013590661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5254685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747512870","doi":"","title":"Royal succession, abdication, and regency in the realms","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abdication; Parliament; Dominion; Law; Humanities; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.04576666992306225,"score_gpt":0.33130244826572774,"score_spread":0.2855357783426655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2747512870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5763666,0.0040379358,0.00013379866,0.05718891,0.00061497855,0.0009620293,0.000012071365,0.00009864895,0.36058503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996361,0.0020394332,0.00023638224,0.000099259145,0.0002943019,0.00004905236,0.0000030945146,0.0000031664742,0.00091429043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989404,0.00016744855,0.00020843843,0.00023482271,0.00021997039,0.00022891007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991794,0.00018710164,0.00016525622,0.00029852104,0.00010685814,0.000062833526],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077910256,0.00010758828,0.00015146167,0.000026270642,0.0044014915,0.00030309538,0.00054637453,0.00009054018,0.000054973825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014694629,0.00007246433,0.00004205689,0.000080164864,0.002015364,0.00028693792,0.000096736454,0.0001403706,0.000023233875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000498058,0.000043288237,0.11399221,0.00001959242,0.000013049171,0.000009033411,0.019361207,0.000011718413,0.000019351393,0.862602,0.0013733724,0.002550216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047792814,0.000018043138,0.6388042,0.00025796515,0.000039009956,0.0000069584535,0.031025838,0.000053367214,0.000018866458,0.005492893,0.32348648,0.0003184507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010027607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019081902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85710907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081936894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010124926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751126414","doi":"","title":"The Perils of Federalizing the Common Law: A Case Study of the Income Tax Act Gift Concept","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Statutory law; Tax law; Political science; Public law; Private law; Civil law (Civil law); Municipal law; Comparative law; Meaning (existential); Legislation; Federal law; Law and economics; Sociology; Tax reform; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027988910541428172,"score_gpt":0.34420177921804096,"score_spread":0.3162128686766128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751126414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98780876,0.0021777407,0.0000027706353,0.0075342795,0.0002951666,0.000477902,0.0000018487648,0.0000075727357,0.001693976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982172,0.00081450306,0.0000021662288,0.000039702987,0.0002358326,0.00000952918,4.7679524e-8,0.000008314127,0.00067267276],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969219,0.00086890254,0.00035439778,0.00011689069,0.0006249031,0.0011129886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981706,0.00039044142,0.0008062903,0.0003883978,0.00019839664,0.000045880173],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034041305,0.00013342655,0.00025339585,0.000008733051,0.01400707,0.0003327171,0.0013574591,0.000055007644,0.000007994162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037563016,0.000055426284,0.00017403415,0.0000852331,0.0014804916,0.00023497267,0.00026334135,0.0012197511,0.0000011161565],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011130616,0.00036649726,0.12759233,0.0000105469535,0.0014501758,0.000048235663,0.5647316,0.00005689773,0.00032606264,0.2880533,0.00025378406,0.01699926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010255425,0.00039028274,0.020212496,0.000035758316,0.00012873461,0.00023723925,0.9554251,0.000013092401,0.00011174629,0.01766021,0.004587885,0.00017191756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10892853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54154646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43261793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005167654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055787124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98727655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751127831","doi":"","title":"Come colmare il divario tra diritto e società? In cerca di coerenza tra ‘right to die’, suicidio assistito ed eutanasia in Canada [Right to Die in Courts and Society: A Legal and Social Analysis of Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide in Canada]","year":2010,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Right to die; Law","score_opus":0.07082562435310025,"score_gpt":0.31303951366302657,"score_spread":0.24221388930992632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751127831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9812187,0.00034475088,0.0000025840047,0.01670404,0.000079694204,0.001269324,0.00026045396,0.0000065461545,0.00011388912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99900234,0.0006495541,0.00006538016,0.000117281146,0.00004225709,0.00001528298,0.000018333107,0.00001944544,0.00007012445],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944275,0.0010716749,0.00066599494,0.0008735811,0.0016751637,0.0012860686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973815,0.0012587489,0.00022253586,0.00029787992,0.00034962047,0.00048970943],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020987461,0.00042068513,0.001411286,0.00046119446,0.0009485521,0.00011519389,0.00080942863,0.0002864745,0.000076425225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023891876,0.00039144183,0.00016965946,0.001971437,0.0014596838,0.00039032707,0.00079947273,0.0013046172,8.0782127e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032266448,0.00018243222,0.687903,0.00018609251,0.00046454527,0.00034029878,0.30735213,0.00006326266,0.00057943416,0.00014688482,0.0009886855,0.0014706027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001131978,0.00006110265,0.74932766,0.00015170578,0.00013429132,5.859035e-7,0.24563849,0.00044372954,0.000045860368,0.000020153097,0.0027200524,0.00032437372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99988496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061713643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055543827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033417947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751940329","doi":"","title":"The Married Women's Property Acts of Ontario : being Con. Stat. U.C., c. 73 ; 35 Vict., c. 16, Ont., and 36 Vict., c. 18, Ont. : with [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books  | UK Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Philosophy","score_opus":0.016890695148769563,"score_gpt":0.24799393547634382,"score_spread":0.23110324032757426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751940329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46922445,0.00019303628,0.000005047376,0.0011810017,0.00018181546,0.0007389455,0.000016885075,0.00005318543,0.52840567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9118989,0.0008461808,0.00031307858,0.00014648213,0.00013217845,0.00010660386,0.0000019710585,0.000026260976,0.08652832],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970737,0.00022122492,0.0005745939,0.00044494364,0.00087388913,0.00081163424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979532,0.000652749,0.0004271832,0.0003489081,0.00032870597,0.00028925913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080254494,0.00034068624,0.00058994046,0.00003243273,0.0011853455,0.00008621641,0.00047701615,0.00015441523,0.00031249566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029404392,0.00015245438,0.00009281128,0.00011482374,0.0018776474,0.00036203547,0.00023401178,0.00021167716,0.000007744528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018531039,0.00034950304,0.15094054,0.0002689884,0.0012377868,0.0000563565,0.54140884,0.0000020064235,0.0018776198,0.23850185,0.0054744883,0.058028907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001221174,0.00029675395,0.024495404,0.00021639491,0.00006852856,0.0000016789495,0.0073682005,2.7037905e-7,0.0003616515,0.0021101085,0.96346676,0.00039304775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20214814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6326177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9579923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001041461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061597186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9116839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752753930","doi":"","title":"Are All Charter Rights and Freedoms Really Non-Absolute?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Fundamental rights; Humanities; Philosophy; Human rights","score_opus":0.02911855903871838,"score_gpt":0.3018260082206814,"score_spread":0.272707449181963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752753930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81725156,0.00050514593,0.0000064519095,0.013341962,0.0010242168,0.00055935455,0.000030645635,0.00016147335,0.16711919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98263556,0.00013576822,0.0003767822,0.0008884349,0.0011767667,0.00004015834,0.0000032677124,0.000014743627,0.014728507],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998196,0.00009969218,0.00022213293,0.00042369848,0.00047226498,0.0005862297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985843,0.000078068464,0.0003251376,0.00046945064,0.00015782074,0.00038523466],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004456514,0.00021918044,0.0003273276,0.000016934953,0.0042730817,0.00071503606,0.0006342625,0.00019242932,0.00029041138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003343005,0.00016921309,0.00010261454,0.000041149462,0.00120883,0.00081785297,0.00024791906,0.00027867887,0.0005033384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018916732,0.00052317895,0.1886696,0.00021453924,0.0011526012,0.00047467745,0.09927871,0.000005888318,0.002347367,0.32921806,0.3729069,0.0050193164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007025364,0.000033563523,0.3319259,0.00008046686,0.000042230535,0.0000013751159,0.0014532558,0.000010329978,0.00007455891,0.0047456897,0.6605274,0.00040271078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.088844955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17482133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32447237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012551657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025328958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753240539","doi":"","title":"Statutes of the province of Ontario.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books  | UK Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.018388784909893957,"score_gpt":0.2665421542642308,"score_spread":0.24815336935433682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753240539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4344568,0.00012427362,0.0000026258488,0.00069332484,0.00019497242,0.00031238561,0.000024279425,0.000013048112,0.5641783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9393897,0.00014530361,0.0002965426,0.00003304392,0.00006152654,0.000009410446,3.0104275e-7,0.0000053098483,0.060058873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987948,0.000085135995,0.00031678725,0.0001371165,0.00045305066,0.00021309165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990531,0.0002513002,0.00029374863,0.00019266701,0.0001631477,0.000046035642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002533449,0.00009735193,0.00024496033,0.0000104141,0.00018904531,0.000004872673,0.00036721845,0.00006464569,0.0001655507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022993775,0.000048945567,0.000118834425,0.000053302567,0.00113123,0.00011132556,0.00012929975,0.00006131904,0.0000036896063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004975139,0.00012794058,0.20346305,0.00009972802,0.00013133686,0.000002101404,0.06406332,0.000001124689,0.0020149285,0.715615,0.0041019865,0.010329747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004617501,0.0000851731,0.15088046,0.00020887407,0.000056167348,1.6937446e-7,0.0011103322,6.5418256e-8,0.0060800514,0.0074409987,0.8334759,0.00020006768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30733112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4880335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8293739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018690374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003894348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6972814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754291607","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwx039","title":"A Human Rights Perspective of Assisted Suicide: Accounting for Disparate Jurisprudence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legislature; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Parliament; High Court; Politics","score_opus":0.09521898072499438,"score_gpt":0.454386274419599,"score_spread":0.35916729369460465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754291607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06764734,0.2014152,0.00021528974,0.19925366,0.0018108153,0.0075730905,0.0000745762,0.00031991018,0.52169013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99370664,0.0038109366,0.0002741058,0.00072100596,0.0004071585,0.00012451444,0.0000025521144,0.000007794826,0.0009453103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804175,0.00017190448,0.00036919993,0.00026230272,0.0008274754,0.00032737246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984534,0.00024159989,0.0004285093,0.00026979475,0.00043405558,0.00017265222],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018652186,0.00012889632,0.000542945,0.0000070500973,0.0034347342,0.00007916339,0.00076753146,0.00010808709,0.00040453434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043714377,0.00008412662,0.00020830813,0.00006874046,0.0015289694,0.0002493717,0.00013752891,0.00016366648,0.00002652063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028347345,0.000060945662,0.00049212336,0.00078184693,0.000060699043,0.000005670783,0.0013210095,1.172024e-8,0.000015301624,0.9907,0.0037700755,0.0027894692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045155876,0.00004872586,0.014975407,0.008081366,0.00019613277,0.000001040186,0.00034294842,0.0000045530664,0.000045682587,0.008397455,0.96716726,0.0002878713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046322316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046292137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98230255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014050235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064005864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99786264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756062785","doi":"","title":"Addressing disputes between First Nations: An exploration of the indigenous legal lodge","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Law; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.25197287582867617,"score_gpt":0.3682402492349883,"score_spread":0.11626737340631216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756062785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90239286,0.00016219767,0.00046522758,0.0019694509,0.0002997612,0.0006630082,0.000013534677,0.00012200092,0.093911946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99815685,0.000049281363,0.0007010315,0.000029582361,0.00018377148,0.00002018596,0.000003477745,0.0000047754393,0.00085104216],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990708,0.00013546742,0.0001749051,0.00011954151,0.0003201312,0.00017911199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943703,0.00014398906,0.00011518685,0.000109960914,0.00014475282,0.00004907951],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027287047,0.000072863964,0.00010830613,0.000025612404,0.0021519205,0.00005605526,0.00027673514,0.00006256093,0.00011063961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035540076,0.000044111366,0.000052221458,0.00027746276,0.00034456508,0.0015018254,0.00006142206,0.0000697199,0.000011515325],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047364783,0.00012687955,0.17640388,0.000022773933,0.000057180183,4.8741043e-7,0.76243335,0.0000059676136,0.000044311015,0.054468133,0.00029096054,0.0061413716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003440387,0.0001099184,0.8186823,0.00011306689,0.000087091976,1.8384871e-7,0.13914678,0.000011404575,0.0040953625,0.0038004525,0.03320358,0.0004058128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028397294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11864175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64227843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000818505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005567534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756904910","doi":"10.11157/anzswj-vol29iss3id301","title":"Supporting grandparent/grandchild contact under the Care of Children Act 2004: an assessment of current options, and a call for change.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grandparent; Legislation; Aotearoa; Family law; Legal guardian; Law; Safeguarding; Political science; Respite care; Medicine; Psychology; Nursing; Sociology","score_opus":0.060175950474610246,"score_gpt":0.4135407394023933,"score_spread":0.353364788927783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756904910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831726,0.0019596915,0.000025805202,0.012252635,0.0003988003,0.0015645064,0.0001065222,0.00003027928,0.0004891783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99766386,0.00038175893,0.00012057056,0.00003917279,0.0007438313,0.000047622223,0.00003736276,0.00001161114,0.00095422816],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985843,0.00017868294,0.00029154794,0.00022209536,0.00035512255,0.0003682564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989261,0.00014037614,0.00049731444,0.00017333974,0.00015951933,0.000103351056],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000555154,0.00015404385,0.0003724638,0.000020163845,0.003145907,0.00013508658,0.00034228474,0.000113346076,0.000017349555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011194068,0.000105872656,0.00016708425,0.000089516245,0.00038879682,0.00021346175,0.00008598061,0.00017568235,4.622499e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011455423,0.00014919254,0.6514224,0.00005218381,0.00029896272,3.408798e-7,0.25718576,0.0000047589774,0.000026320466,0.0058998805,0.010465498,0.07438017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011370253,0.00007390804,0.9782108,0.00006593833,0.000120462275,1.2040609e-7,0.007396463,0.0000024641856,0.000008885865,0.0010140454,0.011815032,0.000154858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015751924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004653239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3267884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082818624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012615633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99815184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758548719","doi":"","title":"Constitutional law of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01665031955606958,"score_gpt":0.2386969532323604,"score_spread":0.22204663367629082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758548719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02476435,0.00017852339,0.0000023853634,0.004734672,0.0003910584,0.00018437947,0.00025313615,0.0000118084545,0.9694797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98177654,0.00021639663,0.00014679943,0.0002998065,0.00016710853,0.000009966258,0.0000023365167,0.0000039977667,0.017377038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987235,0.00006261104,0.00025055427,0.00014011866,0.00042245345,0.00040076533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989491,0.00019270966,0.00014075686,0.000111071546,0.00019903465,0.00040730266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019269035,0.000098671866,0.00020936326,0.000045390232,0.00040223153,0.0000064405417,0.00022331053,0.0000722108,0.00044613433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040220883,0.00007202528,0.00005447311,0.0001405894,0.0016609197,0.000112768845,0.00001979248,0.000048244423,0.0000059682584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027970943,0.000004276698,0.006147774,0.0000075045855,0.000026567759,0.000008861347,0.0009482982,7.1035015e-7,0.000024618425,0.967437,0.023929588,0.001461948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015371936,0.000008737502,0.009229148,0.00003438865,0.000010123631,5.183205e-7,0.0004922301,6.6807395e-8,0.00006694902,0.00092462363,0.98896205,0.00011744218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9993493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96651244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061097834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034243937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6119728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759537800","doi":"10.29173/alr791","title":"Life Among the Ruins: Section 91(24) After Tsilhqot'in and Grassy Narrows","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Supreme court; Law; Section (typography); Doctrine; Sovereign immunity; Constitution; Conversation; Political science; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.032250880041400615,"score_gpt":0.32218425469092465,"score_spread":0.28993337464952407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759537800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5277029,0.2096414,5.971413e-7,0.1153991,0.0015302262,0.0024265647,0.0000031747122,0.00004695432,0.14324908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91099894,0.08311331,0.000010583844,0.0027201804,0.00033447857,0.00019878527,9.145959e-7,0.000008526697,0.002614249],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986819,0.00029809022,0.00024413633,0.00024736763,0.00024156168,0.00028691924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906653,0.00023982419,0.00018172254,0.0003263336,0.000055393673,0.00013020811],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007553415,0.00014466248,0.000315009,0.0000065548797,0.0017299775,0.00022525263,0.00033602503,0.000082585095,0.00017656937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022264533,0.00008532269,0.000099146615,0.000079413985,0.00077863544,0.0004794258,0.00013077704,0.00018271133,0.000068432855],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040282914,0.0001693884,0.70082194,0.0026218805,0.000336801,0.000026616872,0.064192,0.0000010312093,0.000023590057,0.12530392,0.07823798,0.028224545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012709139,0.000010056601,0.18797427,0.0010839632,0.000047823214,5.9900077e-7,0.00044915598,0.0000019162705,0.0000012962905,0.00013593596,0.81001025,0.00015760878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22417258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53302866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7317723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006551975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002579606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W275968636","doi":"","title":"Families and the Law in Canada: Cases and Commentary by Mary Jane Mossman","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Genealogy; Sociology; Political science; History","score_opus":0.00799124255081855,"score_gpt":0.24330209363889954,"score_spread":0.235310851088081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W275968636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88064915,0.029114665,0.0000010282145,0.088623755,0.000050907005,0.00013791276,0.000005013541,0.000006164818,0.001411424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96062964,0.036385305,0.000010907943,0.0024156794,0.00017841485,0.0000048419042,0.0000011472994,0.0000045098786,0.00036954886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824053,0.00022897958,0.00016281531,0.00010511955,0.00024321293,0.0010193634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994872,0.00031982045,0.000061960636,0.000039912404,0.00002347952,0.00006759367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010210559,0.000098454824,0.00016021909,0.000011864865,0.0010884635,0.000060175673,0.00013111591,0.000029480003,0.000011602895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006679869,0.0000621823,0.00002228343,0.00007083542,0.0005069263,0.00019054444,0.00004922969,0.00070267305,6.0679656e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032986776,0.00013048567,0.21068099,0.000020527756,0.00065681135,0.00005446574,0.077359825,0.000027569018,0.00007919235,0.5108474,0.050798405,0.14901446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046231337,0.00012843098,0.026160873,0.000044135268,0.000094212155,0.0002771456,0.5681645,0.00005911664,0.000030189884,0.020664187,0.37920883,0.000545226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98179626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4908047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022641597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073760725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83716905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760111773","doi":"","title":"The statutes of Nova Scotia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Statute; Geography; Political science; Law; Archaeology; Engineering; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.02156211937397611,"score_gpt":0.26667958574001605,"score_spread":0.24511746636603993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760111773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18190745,0.00085390214,0.0000022447507,0.009017867,0.00062751933,0.00037732153,0.000104910665,0.000024428638,0.8070844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681947,0.0020809274,0.00018504236,0.00010314627,0.00022888037,0.000006969645,0.0000011626629,0.0000114983295,0.029187651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986226,0.000101638565,0.000286309,0.0001485579,0.00035853512,0.00048234896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864,0.00048827752,0.00019601226,0.0001878074,0.0002028391,0.00028504472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041264965,0.00011093817,0.00019945642,0.00008299459,0.00043768185,0.00002050235,0.00039068717,0.00007937307,0.00023746115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088974653,0.000061466875,0.00008656592,0.00022103442,0.0009575583,0.00013722372,0.000033780518,0.00006230774,0.00004371999],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002729737,0.000029750689,0.13425916,0.00003945435,0.00020251928,0.000014339971,0.026715146,0.000001057433,0.00033698883,0.5999719,0.14059831,0.09780409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014093205,0.000021327134,0.056174368,0.00003682687,0.000014371503,1.9135335e-7,0.0016079334,7.648005e-8,0.0000932518,0.0011216525,0.94067603,0.00011301462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9186748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9930882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80007774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002060288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060257886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35281634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760640120","doi":"","title":"An act to render permanent certain parts of the act for amending the Constitution of the Government of Newfoundland: 25th June 1847","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books  | UK Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Public administration; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030055536454277988,"score_gpt":0.30367965761776666,"score_spread":0.27362412116348866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760640120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78514963,0.00009609057,0.000032956163,0.004996943,0.0007758836,0.0016140357,0.00014393231,0.000014113252,0.2071764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99654156,0.00012976183,0.00007603838,0.00008742651,0.00011079784,0.00003883912,6.159076e-7,0.000005444263,0.0030095147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827695,0.00019446899,0.000359751,0.00015965023,0.00077832415,0.00023083089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878913,0.0003460766,0.0004056363,0.0002959798,0.00011068425,0.000052498097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005887526,0.00012213383,0.00024948042,0.0000073944675,0.0004521393,0.00001024038,0.00048031018,0.000058524834,0.000032577598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029135303,0.00004962473,0.00016940209,0.00007486996,0.0009840017,0.00009689057,0.00012520503,0.00005575464,5.8843756e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020503766,0.00021497966,0.08472568,0.00011899192,0.0002402556,3.8360437e-7,0.07096856,0.000067250825,0.014733708,0.81603706,0.0033266991,0.009361399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015310397,0.0002557302,0.24370088,0.000614442,0.0003301016,9.630675e-7,0.013219452,0.000011038724,0.014908853,0.0042615733,0.72073305,0.00043290865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008316607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018410752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81177545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024355605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009536086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760832621","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3044849","title":"The Door Has a Tendency to Swing Shut: The Saga of Aboriginal Peoples' Equality Claims","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Swing; Shut down; Political science; History; Law; Engineering; Visual arts; Art; Nuclear engineering","score_opus":0.023760555207843228,"score_gpt":0.3292943576302006,"score_spread":0.3055338024223574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760832621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90161824,0.0037602542,0.0026622596,0.080928676,0.0008073099,0.0005345447,0.000003095927,0.000057257494,0.009628377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933535,0.0031554326,0.00006242123,0.00020014077,0.0010027259,0.000011600513,2.7806726e-7,0.000010529436,0.0022033583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955745,0.000771252,0.00040858268,0.00019114619,0.000869691,0.002184836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834394,0.00076582574,0.00027442985,0.0001997507,0.0002828472,0.00013321728],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008819621,0.0001625281,0.00023800503,0.000025874155,0.0047312165,0.00025997625,0.00090394856,0.000077891134,0.000036733934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009767419,0.00008081127,0.00020463833,0.0003587352,0.0005270508,0.00018489489,0.00006905023,0.0013111415,0.000035248537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005747891,0.000045609842,0.006594812,0.0000066080333,0.00019613201,4.3007796e-7,0.06218363,0.000022988239,0.0003388367,0.90356845,0.0008028833,0.02618217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008418522,0.00055100635,0.031951346,0.00008179093,0.00015441362,0.000032940654,0.28062406,0.00003951213,0.00016692856,0.27297375,0.41205397,0.0005284068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007659548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12867825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6305947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011064815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020698442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761005817","doi":"","title":"Constitutional law of Canada ; Canada Act 1982 annotated","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0136230549071794,"score_gpt":0.2288224240883695,"score_spread":0.2151993691811901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761005817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07640412,0.00020530428,9.577017e-7,0.007037263,0.00069579197,0.00030631074,0.0011163641,0.00001566678,0.91421825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856819,0.00015390605,0.00006882457,0.00053062686,0.00015342612,0.00001220813,0.000011037924,0.0000066712546,0.0133813815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980447,0.0000948165,0.0003656506,0.00020571005,0.00067818246,0.00061090605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838895,0.00026861968,0.00021742398,0.00015307046,0.00033119635,0.0006407504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001978883,0.00016087382,0.00031056063,0.000050951538,0.0005656595,0.000009789607,0.00031771662,0.00008590817,0.00042363693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005103724,0.00012247897,0.00005456391,0.00023572451,0.0013211056,0.00013297488,0.000025748044,0.00008229213,0.0000023219768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013603139,0.000011641842,0.020499485,0.000026508731,0.00012651164,0.000081448736,0.0015892332,0.000009258523,0.000065281754,0.7925308,0.18246076,0.002585513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021931321,0.000010009368,0.016343197,0.00004384035,0.00001541218,0.0000010287082,0.0005934444,2.9602353e-7,0.00009130602,0.00019636145,0.98229426,0.00019153365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9092778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018770484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018976882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9865846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761038845","doi":"","title":"Halsbury's Laws of Canada. Receivers and other court officers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.015744504488831433,"score_gpt":0.23608940086690597,"score_spread":0.22034489637807453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761038845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15000863,0.00039331717,0.000001013965,0.008374683,0.00034165234,0.0003341376,0.00026867923,0.00001920218,0.84025866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9442841,0.0013381472,0.0002472309,0.00054220227,0.00019572668,0.000013826976,0.0000015241997,0.000022150922,0.05335512],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985098,0.000098140794,0.00027226412,0.00021348102,0.00041035292,0.00049590773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987561,0.00021473381,0.00020346424,0.00014648566,0.0001555311,0.00052370114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029604838,0.0001464333,0.00029621387,0.00010758459,0.00033962913,0.000011615277,0.00023365485,0.000108096996,0.00034904265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044468642,0.00010990007,0.000050646242,0.00017570987,0.00062506873,0.00011572286,0.000025315921,0.00006564164,0.0000036284976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006577054,0.000035963378,0.15930548,0.00011126506,0.00038656447,0.00005912075,0.03552767,0.0000056492677,0.00038497613,0.15012033,0.62487394,0.029123232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024267675,0.000019053496,0.024591152,0.000050702172,0.000022004355,4.759565e-7,0.0026489184,2.2979012e-7,0.000042963013,0.00014322685,0.9720674,0.00017116203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9982455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79427546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056266156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022057344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4481595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761127015","doi":"","title":"Bills of the House of Commons of Canada = Projet de loi de la Chambre des communes du Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Books | European Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.01580425026619769,"score_gpt":0.23454548053418417,"score_spread":0.21874123026798648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761127015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6755277,0.0018140321,0.0000020878085,0.0025227289,0.00030259325,0.0003049055,0.00034607868,0.000014068745,0.3191658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856535,0.0021376067,0.00017697956,0.00013254069,0.00012598251,0.000004223663,7.303168e-7,0.00003735588,0.011731064],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959213,0.0021800068,0.0006589657,0.00017240741,0.00057046395,0.0004968621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972529,0.0012455619,0.00066518626,0.00037951313,0.00030353657,0.00015329209],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011454304,0.00023235999,0.00050701667,0.000015658103,0.0004288335,0.000007723302,0.00088992825,0.000072789495,0.000036558406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007475812,0.00014129131,0.00013939472,0.00016768767,0.0044274125,0.00010053059,0.0003708233,0.00016716524,7.007475e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011472814,0.0006781426,0.5177014,0.0016205924,0.00088594644,0.00010395542,0.124332465,0.00008625189,0.0038678048,0.24323885,0.08916743,0.018202433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000572593,0.00008054431,0.30553582,0.0009032217,0.00014584084,0.0000066967764,0.0044102794,0.000002018362,0.0028339163,0.0004477879,0.68475914,0.00030212765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99836934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5955917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053780613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021495852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99828196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761198583","doi":"","title":"Is the Canadian Constitution ready for the 21st century","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03940740421695409,"score_gpt":0.28292914761978233,"score_spread":0.24352174340282823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761198583","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002235343,0.0010837385,0.0000026757632,0.08181329,0.0009904482,0.0012490703,0.00058357726,0.000025236233,0.91201663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96783864,0.0047390196,0.00007573231,0.0026664617,0.0007487933,0.00015884278,0.0000079737065,0.000013341588,0.02375119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848735,0.000094439165,0.0002269994,0.00020433006,0.00031108694,0.00067581673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830776,0.000559472,0.00013140145,0.0002499822,0.00024214985,0.0005092264],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005634607,0.00014287017,0.00016622244,0.0000978353,0.0028501037,0.000065438704,0.00049100694,0.00013643838,0.00022565968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007951905,0.000069928705,0.000109714936,0.00020064937,0.0012738408,0.0001429897,0.00001926463,0.000098255456,0.00004791487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005227577,0.0000040196087,0.0049925093,0.000007315272,0.00007482762,0.0000029631933,0.011766288,4.9205e-7,0.0000062808704,0.8435618,0.11079266,0.028785586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015406216,0.000012069604,0.011694662,0.000022411825,0.00004005494,6.4201106e-7,0.0042551113,5.352205e-7,0.0000073424912,0.00066637306,0.9830122,0.00013451857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99987525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9656033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009417597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023168027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761272798","doi":"","title":"statutes Canada. Laws","year":2017,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Biography | US Enciclopedia of law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; Statute of limitations; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.03921498215729867,"score_gpt":0.30602342922749903,"score_spread":0.26680844707020035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761272798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5720072,0.010113808,0.0000033017902,0.011394417,0.0065877037,0.001244497,0.0013371436,0.000119465694,0.39719245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903987,0.003728702,0.00017482534,0.0003745078,0.00073693326,0.000026495707,0.000013235076,0.000026282696,0.0045203087],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99614245,0.00021041336,0.0006431994,0.00060754205,0.0012885954,0.0011077762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99696356,0.00026199792,0.00093702506,0.00083969225,0.0005200069,0.0004777136],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006272013,0.000455482,0.0007240838,0.00007324265,0.0039924067,0.00031518025,0.0015286817,0.0002831195,0.00024796766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041438433,0.0003890767,0.00047581017,0.00037366414,0.003094441,0.0005491537,0.00039389977,0.00030002592,0.000022310629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010386801,0.00041489222,0.6152424,0.0003759882,0.0014255565,0.00010893003,0.03909653,0.0000043150826,0.00032659434,0.12326316,0.2158409,0.003796859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045232812,0.00008625951,0.22485343,0.000102426486,0.00017755834,4.7211427e-7,0.0052246084,0.0000026682394,0.00044012646,0.00022852932,0.7678694,0.00056216127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9853491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98996276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55202854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021309474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006937878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761710997","doi":"","title":"The dictionary of Canadian law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.019141765689103175,"score_gpt":0.24546646508556416,"score_spread":0.226324699396461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761710997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024524081,0.0005275503,3.5725483e-7,0.015139679,0.0005116522,0.00030245128,0.00016752948,0.000019698862,0.958807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95428205,0.0033683593,0.00007688151,0.00035007676,0.00032291215,0.000029508903,0.000002842334,0.000013968161,0.041553415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846125,0.00011999246,0.00029094942,0.0001682691,0.00035351756,0.00060602784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983922,0.00033651758,0.00014867533,0.00020643893,0.00020185341,0.0007142792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039133837,0.00012339118,0.00019364688,0.00024610112,0.0012835065,0.000021195583,0.0004092391,0.000118205644,0.00021592484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041304438,0.00007506728,0.00009788007,0.000415792,0.0010881084,0.00015587639,0.000023561703,0.00008132062,0.000028899185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057717416,0.0000062712174,0.009491964,0.0000074992026,0.00006444843,0.000014116425,0.005488815,5.56887e-7,0.000032349006,0.9210311,0.050895803,0.012961271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010649087,0.000017030892,0.026182463,0.000026741836,0.000013804101,6.1116793e-7,0.001290097,1.2873328e-7,0.000022086235,0.0016387086,0.97058535,0.000116495095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.998993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99993896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92975795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005293797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012275806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98718244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761716222","doi":"","title":"Statutes of Alberta.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science; Geology","score_opus":0.017345525414267243,"score_gpt":0.2562592963969972,"score_spread":0.23891377098272995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761716222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15818784,0.00025499548,0.0000015139221,0.0040645623,0.00025566606,0.00024421798,0.00006506413,0.000016637692,0.83690953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91133976,0.0015000924,0.00031765236,0.00012874117,0.00019771582,0.00001693319,0.0000023188984,0.000012982019,0.086483784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986936,0.00008325652,0.00028367765,0.00017051524,0.00031649633,0.00045246904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987318,0.00037890306,0.00018320048,0.00015770497,0.00016317565,0.00038520008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021757335,0.00011814789,0.00025786913,0.00014481052,0.000235559,0.000009698394,0.00027866592,0.00009952173,0.0005768007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008832156,0.000082049686,0.00009111152,0.00021480775,0.0005511994,0.00017219366,0.000026994454,0.00005061135,0.000038334827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027230943,0.000054367796,0.15636413,0.000077448254,0.00021517936,0.000020652993,0.06645891,0.0000012558139,0.00043995955,0.6056341,0.1041391,0.066567704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017719505,0.000024851219,0.03780842,0.000044971373,0.000016589966,1.9641342e-7,0.0011628518,8.59025e-8,0.00010939902,0.0009830508,0.9595306,0.00014182183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9570989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85539144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021604632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005522108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63155633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761720778","doi":"","title":"Canada. Parliament. Senate. Submissions Group on the Meech Lake Constitutional Accord","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Group (periodic table); Law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.027312101258993898,"score_gpt":0.2628472531027084,"score_spread":0.2355351518437145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761720778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1511298,0.0005912582,8.705206e-7,0.1039249,0.0020236042,0.00082029833,0.0010448159,0.00004699838,0.7404175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99152327,0.0042739282,0.00006529706,0.0009659525,0.00034597598,0.000053615153,0.000017823637,0.000008975716,0.0027451783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980068,0.00013281034,0.0002674502,0.00027181074,0.0006836533,0.0006374258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998314,0.0002270217,0.00029540475,0.00042321297,0.00019047521,0.0005498383],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040501327,0.00020872374,0.00024579393,0.0002632335,0.005323531,0.00015244777,0.00089008256,0.00013426504,0.0004122925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010716107,0.00014439391,0.00014829342,0.00059660536,0.0039423467,0.00019126153,0.000069262904,0.00020478814,0.0000115519],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000988709,0.000025464193,0.07486806,0.000008651207,0.0001224025,0.000028881332,0.0012325878,9.534466e-7,0.000013375728,0.5305459,0.39182228,0.0013216009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012069294,0.000013472214,0.11759837,0.00003813688,0.000023927962,5.147923e-7,0.0026878668,3.478866e-7,0.000011196039,0.00036812128,0.87895125,0.00018611284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99747133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8403934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021581969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018402665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761768900","doi":"10.7202/1022069ar","title":"Federal Juridiction over Labour Relations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Legislature; Jurisdiction; Bargaining power; Order (exchange); Power (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political economy; Politics","score_opus":0.02985269595593636,"score_gpt":0.29595361937713116,"score_spread":0.2661009234211948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761768900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.692437,0.00023304581,0.0013672089,0.02346992,0.0006995036,0.0004180459,0.000016026164,0.0003757849,0.28098348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94082606,0.000067508176,0.0005297195,0.00011286059,0.00062985794,0.000024617202,0.00001493723,0.000010397843,0.057784062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986831,0.00024804246,0.00023430046,0.0002002834,0.00035318005,0.00028109597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999137,0.00036735117,0.00011045723,0.00013227928,0.00014232092,0.00011062017],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041483482,0.00011580157,0.00012687764,0.00006383129,0.003102526,0.000121206744,0.00012669316,0.00031856794,0.0011455099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012026156,0.00010739804,0.00007591099,0.00048474316,0.00024206142,0.00038402184,0.000039892635,0.00038208655,0.0005645822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073657857,0.00009934609,0.1932541,0.0000013781591,0.00009290322,8.77642e-7,0.022134988,0.0014614254,0.00005386881,0.6536733,0.11347754,0.015742911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022590734,0.000014396478,0.12624593,0.000014386127,0.000020541956,2.9556614e-7,0.0037731505,0.00020614512,0.000016794676,0.0019559602,0.86737186,0.00015460316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035788922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011894741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7538943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027623773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011695103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762187591","doi":"","title":"Canada. Supreme Court","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.020415390472884005,"score_gpt":0.2592425347335706,"score_spread":0.2388271442606866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762187591","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13878599,0.0010145471,3.5140368e-7,0.037000887,0.0016580109,0.00043363305,0.00037185286,0.000041109746,0.8206936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829633,0.008258892,0.00021410569,0.00036479792,0.00047665,0.000021983311,0.000009740982,0.000015391459,0.007675133],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813795,0.000072933435,0.0002629833,0.00025296112,0.0005580241,0.0007151272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982395,0.00008143268,0.00029809304,0.0004373312,0.00026273134,0.00068087707],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029552923,0.00018384807,0.0002943655,0.0003694125,0.002945299,0.00012364017,0.00091120653,0.00014019832,0.00024019944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079170713,0.0001712329,0.00013387966,0.0005678714,0.001495535,0.0002791194,0.00006209776,0.00013048772,0.000009540123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068070813,0.000015285821,0.2960436,0.000021837675,0.00012893218,0.000045734156,0.004545091,8.0278556e-7,0.000010564192,0.03746746,0.6584933,0.003220611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010244741,0.000009417108,0.2585595,0.000014125466,0.000020034793,2.8095596e-7,0.0019628913,2.9857588e-7,0.0000072832645,0.00014593062,0.73900163,0.00017618199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99991304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8441773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025798488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020507593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762329121","doi":"","title":"Saskatchewan. Committee to Study and Review the Judicial System of Saskatchewan","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.015196952557516387,"score_gpt":0.257371395844525,"score_spread":0.24217444328700863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762329121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88182324,0.0226913,0.000003130078,0.042452067,0.0008545409,0.004109526,0.0003482584,0.0000928143,0.04762511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98057413,0.01797261,0.00011639841,0.00044901797,0.0002005076,0.00008855834,0.0000012088241,0.00001363341,0.0005839555],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781317,0.00039944396,0.00050564326,0.00027922963,0.00052105234,0.00048149095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983828,0.00031169644,0.00027466303,0.00032548668,0.00027087558,0.00043445374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010291954,0.00020668707,0.00053186837,0.00038075846,0.00068770687,0.00002104994,0.000517327,0.00009240881,0.000048863327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034128278,0.00011757958,0.0001563569,0.0020770729,0.001102854,0.00010979857,0.00008732118,0.0000846388,0.000008149593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051573887,0.00018730942,0.37611145,0.00086163246,0.0008249885,0.000032905573,0.33983424,1.4636447e-7,0.00010931722,0.006567875,0.16886194,0.10655662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003289939,0.00017165301,0.11754946,0.00077306596,0.00019542663,0.0000010012131,0.24058475,2.6156568e-8,0.000014418891,0.00007908296,0.6400283,0.00027380855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87523615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98861575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47116637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011563105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003431827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5289355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763423419","doi":"","title":"Statutes of Nova Scotia.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Statute; Political science; Law; Geography; Archaeology; Engineering; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.0243551445866123,"score_gpt":0.27038070301787265,"score_spread":0.24602555843126034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763423419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25177372,0.00038120078,0.0000033684908,0.0035684588,0.00044018202,0.00029872364,0.00014242632,0.0000276756,0.7433643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974783,0.00090460957,0.00049963925,0.00012615959,0.00023216812,0.0000054355073,0.0000023840107,0.000013200959,0.02343339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985489,0.00008308212,0.00031194388,0.00018808308,0.00037713643,0.00049084955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879676,0.00022953861,0.00020189276,0.00017128552,0.0002113406,0.0003891716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002869213,0.0001292295,0.00027950402,0.00017452396,0.00018659941,0.000012027453,0.0003094609,0.00010630712,0.0007851329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006670638,0.000091399554,0.00009493156,0.00026698256,0.00066880666,0.00019188394,0.00003199617,0.00006080279,0.00006380158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031936663,0.00007069384,0.31586328,0.000109924535,0.00024875786,0.000037880192,0.039960958,0.0000018974687,0.00091426546,0.43409154,0.1353344,0.073334455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023735032,0.000033100696,0.077546634,0.00007119037,0.000020782829,2.882342e-7,0.001292828,7.88611e-8,0.00020230252,0.00090070965,0.91951257,0.0001821709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9415741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9882661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78417814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024960854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006424387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8596655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763540519","doi":"","title":"Acts of New Brunswick 1975","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.026545974793786283,"score_gpt":0.2673067504393347,"score_spread":0.24076077564554843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763540519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09226998,0.00043590396,0.0000031198222,0.0067343023,0.00038461012,0.00032168918,0.000030306333,0.000033478063,0.8997866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79031223,0.0019174962,0.00052154536,0.00022067415,0.00053257943,0.0000053229624,0.0000019079937,0.000017843036,0.20647043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985003,0.000076971606,0.0003121479,0.00019948419,0.00039016074,0.00052092515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857354,0.00017623721,0.00021720263,0.00018919344,0.00014446517,0.0006993675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024528167,0.0001399494,0.00029789683,0.0001570398,0.00024398137,0.000012760347,0.00035555923,0.0001337818,0.00050870684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000703556,0.00010066932,0.00010917088,0.00026303937,0.00041787076,0.00019426282,0.000033622146,0.000067721514,0.000057901736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002727348,0.000037521288,0.08997913,0.000055914126,0.00016182118,0.000027173845,0.035703797,0.0000011779706,0.00036090083,0.6455308,0.16144024,0.066674225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024061896,0.000026562748,0.05658815,0.00005476916,0.00001835347,2.9820248e-7,0.0006133331,5.7375637e-8,0.00011309032,0.00070009206,0.9414949,0.0001497822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9491131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7800546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023946229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024174268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5569983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763558572","doi":"","title":"Reforming rights : lesbian and gay struggles for legal equality in Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | European Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Gay rights; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.033551226826115464,"score_gpt":0.2865212497405849,"score_spread":0.25297002291446946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763558572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42477846,0.00015459374,0.000008909496,0.0009986287,0.00018917656,0.0003291817,0.000059185026,0.000028396329,0.5734535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895579,0.00017127684,0.00026379997,0.00008387139,0.0002143058,0.000008336278,0.0000019563265,0.000013029346,0.0096855005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984366,0.00028083439,0.00035987404,0.00025300044,0.00028589234,0.00038375135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999234,0.00028984857,0.00014283606,0.00012587396,0.000076882316,0.00013055214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006515371,0.00013991985,0.00024383809,0.000019565696,0.00042385442,0.000021280895,0.0002206487,0.000031506494,0.000016479686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018694086,0.00008889762,0.00004428604,0.000044341858,0.00039961154,0.00026089462,0.00009523318,0.00006715578,0.0000029436992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070477305,0.000048397043,0.026263049,0.000103422804,0.000061507664,0.000041582865,0.023484742,9.379211e-7,0.00039853054,0.8999388,0.0026520484,0.04693646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005165307,0.00002695237,0.027152788,0.00009710323,0.000012319918,4.933011e-7,0.0019261194,5.629226e-7,0.00011524157,0.0015724527,0.9683501,0.00022934293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9523198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9931604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96569806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004210611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019055113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.362514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763678040","doi":"","title":"Constitutional adjudication and the independence of Canada: issues of principle, convention, and law.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | European Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Law; Independence (probability theory); Convention; Political science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.017577792522435135,"score_gpt":0.26959810709522414,"score_spread":0.252020314572789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763678040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15712889,0.0014612777,0.000029711337,0.0021792664,0.00011663987,0.0003449133,0.000044621385,0.000013702287,0.838681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99513733,0.0013932276,0.00011264311,0.000056603876,0.000054774533,0.0000029708049,8.8170697e-7,0.0000028469638,0.00323873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988567,0.0002708912,0.00027952052,0.00012149964,0.00036027422,0.00011110338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991509,0.00025226566,0.00024383332,0.0000885271,0.00021522811,0.000049276052],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000731922,0.0000694713,0.00017137035,0.0000065465447,0.00026557175,0.000006182277,0.00013729351,0.000023498722,0.000025118563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033769416,0.000039681763,0.000024791592,0.00003101374,0.0050914343,0.00011237666,0.00009302075,0.000042199314,7.062035e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001568008,0.0000083013665,0.004927882,0.000019329438,0.000023063656,8.7568895e-7,0.002040199,2.2141506e-7,0.0000875117,0.99209267,0.0001640209,0.0006202538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016299399,0.00004418547,0.16004333,0.00023322603,0.00006867981,0.0000025817008,0.0014316934,0.0000010989424,0.00064428337,0.006850279,0.8288516,0.00019910237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31978247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27786663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98524237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000328268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001093814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763767986","doi":"","title":"The digest of British Columbia case law, 1849-1904 : being the cases reported in volumes I to X, inclusive determined in [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.014917222063550995,"score_gpt":0.2625842070721502,"score_spread":0.24766698500859918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763767986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88924456,0.00020759097,8.6992245e-8,0.0027666113,0.00018516443,0.00078149745,0.00011125411,0.000013747985,0.10668948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850683,0.00046397006,0.000031757423,0.00019963727,0.000111195826,0.000098294,0.0000013243375,0.000014124332,0.0140113905],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978576,0.00027089793,0.0006216387,0.0002726074,0.0003590339,0.000618225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978337,0.0011297577,0.00027449842,0.00027275214,0.00019751785,0.00029171872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085137854,0.00012329628,0.0003296216,0.00008398704,0.0009017741,0.00009651446,0.00039687002,0.00010985335,0.000043052696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028768138,0.000101723555,0.00008292648,0.00048585294,0.0008504108,0.00017942619,0.00012080936,0.00012372053,0.0000027884382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037390084,0.000081145154,0.67178845,0.000051329,0.00013614072,0.015765116,0.08784206,0.000006425767,0.00008996894,0.006223621,0.02311457,0.19486377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000566,0.00006823127,0.35671076,0.00032231194,0.000035923218,0.00017083007,0.018470854,0.0000013991483,0.000015397114,0.0008178444,0.62244695,0.00037347904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5993324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006185837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005866496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69358087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763891033","doi":"","title":"Canada. Parliament. Senate. Task Force on the Meech Lake Constitutional Accord and on the Yukon and the Northwest Territories","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Task force; Task (project management); Political science; Geography; Law; Public administration; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.010951102969688854,"score_gpt":0.21565027810195025,"score_spread":0.2046991751322614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763891033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.587585,0.0012756739,5.6215544e-7,0.32894197,0.0009977508,0.0011763654,0.0016670171,0.000028809021,0.07832684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988673,0.008280995,0.0000067191104,0.0017461298,0.0002807099,0.00007689483,0.0000058818587,0.00000620448,0.00092347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984479,0.00023048125,0.0002067515,0.00022284717,0.0004821664,0.00040983016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998061,0.0012820562,0.00014159507,0.00019274685,0.000116310155,0.0002062826],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049204985,0.00018954602,0.00019839882,0.00011951818,0.0020429974,0.000086349035,0.0003279582,0.000079902406,0.00004915742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060487597,0.00007435334,0.00006928499,0.0005727659,0.007081131,0.00010138743,0.0000450276,0.00012740793,0.0000015161686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004196871,0.000008793537,0.06464603,0.0000066648204,0.00012962987,0.0000055613323,0.003617759,3.2280016e-7,0.000006900796,0.8693599,0.060477823,0.0016986222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028036704,0.000024479088,0.061451443,0.00005054605,0.0000295852,9.474134e-7,0.0058098366,2.463324e-7,0.0000142058325,0.0010729707,0.9311222,0.00014320965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99217606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87064433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010603733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059464737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764040649","doi":"","title":"Classic readings and Canadian cases in the philosophy of law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.034362380858312266,"score_gpt":0.26609349212921374,"score_spread":0.23173111127090146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764040649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20535214,0.0003696095,7.7973255e-8,0.01592586,0.00010660692,0.00032568283,0.0001158147,0.000007999842,0.7777962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957852,0.0007647801,0.000038716193,0.00070563675,0.00015206341,0.000020271764,0.0000016611266,0.00000868142,0.002522994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986767,0.00014387371,0.0002544444,0.00018322754,0.00026183753,0.00047990654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988308,0.0003921595,0.00011766307,0.00014678725,0.00008536165,0.00042725788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004170727,0.00012633321,0.00023546528,0.00021026065,0.00038822048,0.000020901785,0.00029826618,0.000112309426,0.00007228907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004575698,0.00007890098,0.00005125901,0.00024128766,0.00096818694,0.00017240802,0.000017138555,0.00008932796,0.000005548107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004997325,0.000008076228,0.027447032,0.000020221836,0.000021571614,0.00008245189,0.023031551,9.568884e-8,0.000020098843,0.93994313,0.0051536136,0.0042671426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020246133,0.00003782707,0.04506243,0.000087954715,0.000017518825,0.0000038755534,0.0024440782,1.2183965e-7,0.00001321187,0.0058161514,0.9461502,0.00016418619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99815226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99987245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9409966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003511893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058611453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35673252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764139733","doi":"","title":"The provincial statutes of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | European Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.014463431885332896,"score_gpt":0.24402072028462662,"score_spread":0.22955728839929374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764139733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067203455,0.00022470349,0.0000033372373,0.0015742743,0.00034325078,0.00022397905,0.000039429025,0.000027480404,0.9303601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94977635,0.0006445849,0.000098640354,0.00008672919,0.0003500286,0.00000464386,6.283773e-7,0.000014896409,0.0490235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983982,0.00033060208,0.00030806754,0.00014291392,0.0004948005,0.0003254356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888575,0.00048834557,0.00020571193,0.00016072555,0.0001683364,0.00009112831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005977906,0.00010396851,0.00016050739,0.0000069880475,0.0006688656,0.000015016228,0.000403204,0.000020661932,0.0000332113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059030985,0.000052575604,0.000057946236,0.000045668407,0.000877165,0.00010320664,0.0001184155,0.00005713283,0.000007610214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005003284,0.000044929402,0.0073959967,0.000033574295,0.00010008356,0.00001970015,0.015292856,8.2805695e-7,0.00050202676,0.8897704,0.043147355,0.043642204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001584257,0.000025625743,0.015971905,0.000028337576,0.000011084553,1.2234409e-7,0.0009397311,6.092102e-8,0.00015395926,0.0005195979,0.98208934,0.00010179038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63970786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88988936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.938942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012920564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034016438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5144441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764262134","doi":"","title":"Canada's indigenous constitution","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Indigenous; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.015363577685405682,"score_gpt":0.23839583990779317,"score_spread":0.22303226222238748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764262134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102214634,0.00031428545,0.0000032959585,0.005764671,0.00061053096,0.0003908352,0.00020057376,0.00003338735,0.89046776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97085905,0.0008170178,0.000095237156,0.00042275465,0.00028314165,0.000020463143,0.0000038026599,0.000007365312,0.02749115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854773,0.00008224086,0.00022742957,0.00018300232,0.00039354363,0.0005660383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989173,0.00013389962,0.00013038669,0.0001347422,0.00015242786,0.0005312611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020628718,0.00012382785,0.00019984043,0.00011518164,0.0007019755,0.00001690338,0.00025123055,0.00010042157,0.0002556696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049861055,0.00009082256,0.00004933195,0.00020276532,0.0005005936,0.00013364393,0.000019262912,0.00006617178,0.00002429311],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001818418,0.00003097589,0.121006556,0.00004106487,0.0001757451,0.00019653238,0.02564773,0.0000031591997,0.00012872988,0.51682615,0.22684413,0.10908106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014086283,0.000010617986,0.033971485,0.000026590846,0.000012370881,9.1165657e-7,0.0006937019,4.2031267e-8,0.000025377916,0.0002550607,0.96470493,0.00015806843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99986625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8686444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001407018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067554843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764654819","doi":"10.21991/c93q04","title":"NELLES V. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO ET AL.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Art; Ancient history; Geography; History; Archaeology; Biology; Zoology","score_opus":0.03713018147208178,"score_gpt":0.2856270832470552,"score_spread":0.24849690177497344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764654819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103235565,0.0012003437,0.0038587023,0.072853334,0.002740704,0.0019586873,0.00016106048,0.00020885737,0.81378275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936673,0.0001341127,0.0010778467,0.0029664289,0.00004352603,0.000091232236,0.000019563238,0.0000061899623,0.0019937844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974566,0.00022119502,0.00059858966,0.0003925401,0.0006296701,0.0007014179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987877,0.00024006108,0.00023127628,0.00026355195,0.0003308555,0.00014652764],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086255436,0.00027495,0.00036312922,0.00010546173,0.0017221279,0.00005207395,0.0005278079,0.00016995418,0.0011581479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004571804,0.00019338478,0.00022818285,0.00038900154,0.011257922,0.00067740824,0.00020852814,0.00042158982,0.00011976646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036745332,0.00012815086,0.14839168,0.000004053183,0.000060097656,0.000011990016,0.0072993613,0.000059004524,0.000015011988,0.83556074,0.008309092,0.00012409425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009747368,0.0000402708,0.050677016,0.00014627576,0.000041635354,0.000016147334,0.012891629,0.000013271609,0.00014630736,0.026095627,0.9085406,0.0004164683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22304434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40883926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90023154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008986827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031241174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765402529","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12301","title":"Shared Parenting in Canada: Increasing Use But Continued Controversy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Statute; Statutory law; Presumption; Child custody; Political science; Child support; Psychology; Law; Family law; Criminology","score_opus":0.07694001248423663,"score_gpt":0.3333489573152807,"score_spread":0.25640894483104404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765402529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.857796,0.10448079,0.000003225402,0.016069787,0.0010628365,0.0017271992,0.000086325796,0.00007142177,0.018702392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.951615,0.045713622,0.00014187423,0.0017275168,0.00016270467,0.00004146949,0.000007661613,0.000010574319,0.0005796087],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789613,0.00040538303,0.00040784967,0.00027857,0.0005193745,0.0004927099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843043,0.00047688826,0.00041176018,0.0003175485,0.00022194383,0.00014141705],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012615978,0.0001757144,0.0006088977,0.00001363078,0.0013970716,0.0003165212,0.000530421,0.000058521106,0.00006553636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009075006,0.00014858603,0.00010240445,0.000083730745,0.00017615489,0.00059039175,0.00015454575,0.00021378009,0.000025332363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023707367,0.00003869236,0.8825356,0.00071107043,0.00012319587,0.00012991554,0.0026938356,0.0000013810927,0.00018731387,0.0011312012,0.0802702,0.032153882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029826094,0.0000029723028,0.66772366,0.0029124136,0.000043694243,3.9386885e-7,0.0017720126,0.000010233805,0.0000013279691,0.000009358922,0.32702914,0.00019654506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9952427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24675894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011506312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073224347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766567649","doi":"","title":"Regulations of Nova Scotia.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Environmental science; Aeronautics; Engineering; Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.026870015229732543,"score_gpt":0.27276649601339575,"score_spread":0.24589648078366322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766567649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20299791,0.00018832376,0.0000058698406,0.005346806,0.00035367574,0.00028679435,0.000092518545,0.000025233245,0.7907029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689945,0.00030163748,0.00049593434,0.00007510041,0.00021183449,0.0000049670866,0.0000023164393,0.000009803687,0.029903885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988013,0.00007432851,0.00028630122,0.00015795587,0.00031650916,0.00036360024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894977,0.00017762031,0.0001815314,0.00017241563,0.00020620867,0.00031245762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023950613,0.00010175294,0.0002192958,0.00017198922,0.00022162528,0.000009109848,0.0002441529,0.00009930068,0.0006901703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059104693,0.00007444995,0.00008731006,0.00029286096,0.00056944805,0.00016402731,0.000023891962,0.000046547702,0.000051274972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001509227,0.000048428985,0.21957316,0.00005306436,0.00015643849,0.000012968004,0.030270088,0.000004593495,0.00066454173,0.6164874,0.09067639,0.042037856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019472896,0.00001950073,0.16490257,0.00006195979,0.000021531427,2.895546e-7,0.0009030181,1.936067e-7,0.00009411289,0.0012108935,0.83244056,0.00015063855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91549903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98829436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76599663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002366757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004955153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7556881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766855129","doi":"10.71781/1926","title":"Le secret sacramentel à l'épreuve du durcissement de la répression de la pédophilie : proposition de réforme du droit québécois à la lumière du droit français","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0178808685868683,"score_gpt":0.3196701635135064,"score_spread":0.3017892949266381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766855129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83092254,0.00070601364,0.000102459584,0.0032109646,0.000444062,0.0018928882,0.00011864396,0.000020853799,0.1625816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776814,0.0020052593,0.002001112,0.00012015234,0.0007914288,0.00046483442,0.00042102762,0.000079617705,0.016435187],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99456114,0.0016774194,0.0007402557,0.0009821738,0.0009515395,0.0010874498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968252,0.00088702515,0.0009812126,0.00046330687,0.00035721474,0.00048604037],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003394705,0.00072639517,0.00088036363,0.00008587626,0.0048455787,0.001867932,0.001835849,0.0015706738,0.0017844728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012917289,0.00071287417,0.0004026889,0.00022336547,0.0013223776,0.0012042483,0.0004331007,0.0010750196,0.00030058055],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059887854,0.0016651568,0.06352036,0.00042676632,0.0008525857,0.00041709965,0.8042053,0.00018509192,0.009630054,0.00611535,0.0046682362,0.10771512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031870645,0.00034815655,0.40913033,0.002909919,0.0010258335,0.00009496981,0.15733394,0.00097600033,0.010746669,0.0034260196,0.4087888,0.00203228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37695575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13147758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6468714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021359846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017599217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766905284","doi":"","title":"Constitutional law of Canada: cases, notes, and materials","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.021637081244336717,"score_gpt":0.24374843697679835,"score_spread":0.22211135573246163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766905284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2605339,0.0006268099,0.000002614212,0.0064242925,0.00060460204,0.000406724,0.0014585967,0.000017998906,0.7299245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99616474,0.00044304956,0.00016162328,0.00018683712,0.00014950265,0.000009922952,0.0000042429697,0.0000041721423,0.0028758936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988605,0.00007627604,0.00026165976,0.00015122113,0.00029878327,0.00035158132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989312,0.00032599282,0.00014467721,0.00009177659,0.00014512785,0.0003611943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022787783,0.000106567386,0.0002482722,0.000041138395,0.00044658867,0.000011582785,0.0001314306,0.000078235455,0.0002765771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067026174,0.00007819863,0.000026068545,0.00008264441,0.0016579601,0.00011051365,0.000025319983,0.000032837455,0.0000021151407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065262884,0.0000043615405,0.0035661305,0.000018441113,0.00003088957,0.000033924476,0.0008248158,1.5867646e-7,0.00017187184,0.98813117,0.0058890665,0.0013226374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020054448,0.000015127203,0.014715792,0.00005272505,0.000017471606,0.0000040279306,0.00030557642,2.1737408e-8,0.00045162224,0.00055279734,0.9835365,0.00014780383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99992824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9875784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039172938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001760113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61088234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767083539","doi":"","title":"Equality Under Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Charter; Bill of rights; Multiculturalism; Common law; Public law; Sociology; Law and economics; Human rights","score_opus":0.06927528886844081,"score_gpt":0.37484842520672385,"score_spread":0.30557313633828304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767083539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033070603,0.1411091,0.000040604886,0.07561607,0.00044280072,0.0013293697,0.000022907812,0.00043077234,0.7777013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8812256,0.057787664,0.0014030926,0.04689077,0.0015106449,0.0001457111,0.000019010837,0.0000369209,0.010980622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970368,0.0005756635,0.00053873885,0.00042528476,0.0007628624,0.0006606402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998802,0.00016912958,0.00019117224,0.0003707304,0.00020867083,0.00025831308],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014954284,0.00026132845,0.0005570993,0.00001068198,0.0015342841,0.00011703672,0.00048036716,0.00014392822,0.0014994703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018552541,0.00020068385,0.00028327474,0.00028209185,0.000911796,0.0005430121,0.00014668342,0.00025864778,0.001674277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021987514,0.000060857645,0.000047467307,0.00016930817,0.00003965069,0.0000013692594,0.0021536348,0.0000037031023,0.000013630688,0.9617234,0.03014254,0.0056422297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016802971,0.000011433053,0.00014986422,0.0003404941,0.000059120583,7.862699e-7,0.0005145054,0.0000029703735,0.000057647667,0.0018301248,0.996557,0.00030804533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024809709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05728634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96641445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041825493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051798037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767096044","doi":"","title":"A digest of the Nova Scotia common law, equity, vice-admiralty and election reports : with notes of many unreported cases [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Equity (law); Law; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.031064517783099488,"score_gpt":0.28958763350594,"score_spread":0.25852311572284054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767096044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8174738,0.00018913503,8.0547335e-7,0.0014460791,0.00018468493,0.0004533789,0.000036368772,0.000016538728,0.1801992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99802494,0.00016673618,0.00006469899,0.00007509186,0.000067657646,0.0000071927216,0.0000016747841,0.000012092266,0.0015799358],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836785,0.00011115563,0.0004744476,0.00023238768,0.00045872852,0.0003554566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829155,0.00027534773,0.00069074146,0.0002616542,0.0002586466,0.00022206371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039376298,0.00015343876,0.00035367583,0.000089378744,0.00032750634,0.000017338274,0.00017358028,0.00010847405,0.00004913556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004981499,0.000088670444,0.00007197318,0.00031042556,0.0011394128,0.00017674969,0.000082193335,0.00008608879,7.4537894e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004173654,0.00005090981,0.9556416,0.00012851688,0.00013872366,0.00011141069,0.0072327913,0.0000017814478,0.0013648155,0.029775374,0.0010417263,0.0044705765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042922262,0.00023721771,0.9008287,0.0005812695,0.00016910303,0.00007924525,0.0012608196,3.5982382e-7,0.0035672125,0.0010379723,0.091434635,0.00037422762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9626848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18055113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016945219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055873307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41982138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767183016","doi":"","title":"The Canadian abridgment, second edition. Index to Canadian legal literature","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); History; Political science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.011439405573109275,"score_gpt":0.24320847779810317,"score_spread":0.2317690722249939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767183016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017287288,0.0006165941,9.691464e-7,0.084916145,0.0017741102,0.0009352233,0.0013746762,0.000039303945,0.8930557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85135627,0.00055399747,0.00006158069,0.0040165163,0.0014765762,0.00011196423,0.000022705799,0.000033114797,0.1423673],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968632,0.00016673462,0.00038533038,0.00040161592,0.00055441004,0.0016287365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99481153,0.0002147607,0.00013505203,0.0003646023,0.0004789908,0.003995049],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006011136,0.00028603815,0.00028794518,0.0006030523,0.0035370013,0.00035637582,0.0007715432,0.0003024207,0.00073383225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088118215,0.00019322567,0.00013173795,0.0007278026,0.0005259572,0.00042093277,0.000034229623,0.00027450972,0.0001689421],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008833327,0.0000054674642,0.009379886,0.0000119929455,0.00009197012,0.00013003097,0.011718001,0.0000012384403,0.000012571694,0.15472214,0.8102451,0.013672759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016333089,0.00002369157,0.059696015,0.00007254601,0.000012204289,0.0000026694688,0.0008729448,2.6266048e-7,0.00000710736,0.0005375227,0.93830556,0.0003061655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83406895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004226025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007923929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767211926","doi":"","title":"Index to Canadian legal literature.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.013581806887710594,"score_gpt":0.253084069737223,"score_spread":0.23950226284951243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767211926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05102559,0.00035117593,0.000002958897,0.03551583,0.00077882526,0.0005826796,0.00029759103,0.000051481547,0.9113939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8986865,0.00048546286,0.00021753294,0.0020967918,0.0006903279,0.00004769675,0.000006137529,0.000024178933,0.097745374],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977621,0.00011575167,0.00029646818,0.00033721508,0.00043442115,0.0010540894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968977,0.00011679238,0.00009374664,0.00025130194,0.00030379897,0.0023366502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033759073,0.0002145345,0.00029162105,0.00057910365,0.0007180218,0.00010006508,0.00049965864,0.00021919033,0.00049311115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009192967,0.00016098017,0.00010850901,0.00067757274,0.00027708543,0.00033909618,0.000034769248,0.00014064627,0.00017942846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025223131,0.00002201426,0.06945639,0.00003224486,0.00013532213,0.0003072536,0.044448532,0.0000031464162,0.0000821946,0.3667258,0.4564261,0.062335752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001548723,0.000024334817,0.04826929,0.000083313826,0.000009782391,0.000001343886,0.0005956974,1.4003966e-7,0.000010052157,0.0004082217,0.950177,0.00026595712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8476609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014541494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023104867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6564581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767307520","doi":"","title":"Canada. Parliament Special Joint Committee of the Senate and of the House of Commons on the Constitution of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; House of Commons; Constitution; Law; Political science; House of Representatives; Select committee; Joint (building); Commons; Engineering; Legislature; Politics","score_opus":0.02065399785319405,"score_gpt":0.22025032827692562,"score_spread":0.19959633042373157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767307520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9061887,0.0002640594,3.6316905e-8,0.022085961,0.00076746073,0.0005505091,0.000840875,0.000002277685,0.06930012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987335,0.0008450488,0.000007927864,0.00012920047,0.00009036206,0.000006627848,5.853446e-7,0.000004937602,0.00018179152],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984205,0.00019316423,0.00039247808,0.000116194315,0.00060988456,0.00026782646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818623,0.00017961096,0.00082567683,0.0004569733,0.00022450688,0.00012701546],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003464461,0.00013069715,0.00033218405,0.000085990476,0.0011602861,0.000012427009,0.0006738938,0.000064977474,0.000019734802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005739551,0.00007068482,0.00012466926,0.00043516868,0.004621482,0.000046302623,0.00010393515,0.00012387735,3.776419e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003053331,0.0000571107,0.53433484,0.0001276654,0.00036936678,0.000003406918,0.011955804,0.000018937562,0.0002574859,0.17694077,0.2751404,0.0007636656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001840726,0.000022153905,0.67353266,0.00013634075,0.00006002805,2.5820984e-7,0.007235703,6.297015e-7,0.0014435349,0.00018649314,0.3170925,0.00010559859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17675427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016687896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027399226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99808735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767383935","doi":"","title":"The amendment of the Constitution of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Amendment; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.013595512029155767,"score_gpt":0.22942090323124784,"score_spread":0.21582539120209207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767383935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16358949,0.00040550696,0.0000010981968,0.013410471,0.0007355989,0.00044498357,0.00013520232,0.00000566985,0.82127196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98578745,0.0006025068,0.000018197023,0.000082348895,0.00006659833,0.000011069326,3.113287e-7,0.0000028296827,0.013428677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882865,0.00010674654,0.00026084264,0.0000909366,0.0004175474,0.00029529032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990159,0.00025205358,0.00024845183,0.00016813898,0.00016236387,0.00015308315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029863874,0.00007581638,0.00014957733,0.00002641823,0.0005884892,0.0000055916707,0.00033823858,0.00004365178,0.00005067892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005718618,0.000035817964,0.00006105603,0.00014940063,0.0011015411,0.000048674712,0.000031036405,0.00004531845,8.259696e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000125850165,0.000013465479,0.037561018,0.00002680213,0.00011187889,0.0000031634495,0.008161152,0.00000520058,0.00038121876,0.8608326,0.07857654,0.01431438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001132076,0.000009376625,0.028709684,0.000045046832,0.0000149276475,1.729308e-7,0.0018367125,1.2740321e-7,0.00041489766,0.0005018644,0.9682881,0.00006588677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9973749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88971156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005384614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002936829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52098083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767431662","doi":"","title":"The revised statutes of British Columbia, 1979 : a revision and consolidation of the public general acts of the Legislature of British [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Consolidation (business); Legislature; Political science; Law; Public administration; Business; Accounting","score_opus":0.012478511811981395,"score_gpt":0.22920928166946017,"score_spread":0.21673076985747877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767431662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.942627,0.0032559875,4.658783e-7,0.003615181,0.0002722248,0.000859608,0.0008664406,0.0000064248875,0.048496682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773243,0.008569012,0.00006911122,0.0000659663,0.00008265567,0.000009520518,0.0000023050652,0.0000091988,0.013867908],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981364,0.0003413632,0.0005197063,0.00017400616,0.0005189961,0.0003095565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979497,0.00035761227,0.00075099483,0.00027428652,0.00052744447,0.00013997148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006438535,0.000086297274,0.00034658104,0.000029512905,0.00038447796,0.000054187603,0.0004955215,0.00012506204,0.000042437718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017004953,0.00006483105,0.00013990558,0.00032680848,0.0017597545,0.00019392882,0.00009957122,0.00010460355,1.8438543e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003544676,0.00011243575,0.34254062,0.0006819583,0.000430161,0.00000837719,0.017230863,0.0000016341619,0.0031244552,0.044725243,0.28191614,0.3091927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035052744,0.000031479954,0.34348387,0.00063157274,0.00004605036,0.000002361798,0.0010719316,6.304699e-7,0.000079085345,0.00049366354,0.65369874,0.0001101044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8670666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9905848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3717826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009483481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070110324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64838886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767516010","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal tenure in the Constitution of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012639949169152752,"score_gpt":0.256854428692721,"score_spread":0.24421447952356826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767516010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22657953,0.00020478871,9.0583507e-7,0.009400654,0.00027759658,0.00028460103,0.00009719514,0.00000583111,0.7631489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942305,0.0005379185,0.000043016207,0.00020617594,0.00012816873,0.000014640219,0.0000013067585,0.000002810521,0.0048354673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883914,0.00011561462,0.00021495216,0.000112863454,0.000374257,0.00034314784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993135,0.0001918015,0.000118499454,0.00011262334,0.0001068083,0.00015682178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035496193,0.00008352566,0.00016111722,0.00007895355,0.00024800174,0.0000073762317,0.00023182902,0.000061768405,0.0000861986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002811144,0.000048285157,0.00003469619,0.00024756222,0.00051482965,0.000094201074,0.000004966443,0.00006889669,0.000002159864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013351969,0.000020157335,0.11945958,0.000028185023,0.000036387977,0.000078690486,0.02753286,0.0000037301963,0.00006020302,0.7636881,0.08220918,0.0068695764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013995612,0.0000092832115,0.08454183,0.000037368067,0.000007617546,7.335219e-7,0.0024532066,1.1120348e-7,0.000012932839,0.00034120222,0.91237706,0.0000787229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9991129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99996513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8301679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005137147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032818872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5821927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767621528","doi":"","title":"The provincial statutes of Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.011717239307851264,"score_gpt":0.23173875473567926,"score_spread":0.220021515427828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767621528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11868298,0.00050423417,9.987582e-7,0.014552154,0.00062786706,0.0004812821,0.00025399655,0.000018236484,0.86487824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9260589,0.001154841,0.000084485706,0.00015159712,0.00035242282,0.000027990096,0.0000014047628,0.0000125166425,0.07215587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844885,0.00010204803,0.0002805601,0.00013981806,0.0004813446,0.0005473872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864334,0.0004317678,0.00019923176,0.00015638658,0.00021922804,0.00035001742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035483294,0.00010813039,0.00019021248,0.000053402502,0.00078776083,0.000015495056,0.00037324772,0.00006494198,0.00008763532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012075413,0.00006076432,0.00005493992,0.00017228305,0.0006046186,0.00009989949,0.000030458306,0.000060825725,0.0000030145954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034418998,0.000018794099,0.043135803,0.00003787154,0.00015102401,0.000025624486,0.016497204,0.0000011574086,0.00012025886,0.49416795,0.3637463,0.08206359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011177003,0.000014732447,0.033064283,0.000020127189,0.000009905915,1.5150785e-7,0.0015357324,1.0864714e-7,0.000059541442,0.00063709065,0.96444106,0.000105471554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99905825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8073759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005923876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052831694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9372116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767694151","doi":"10.7202/1055264ar","title":"Parental Alienation in Quebec Custody Litigation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Skepticism; Child custody; Criminology; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.009424843567067616,"score_gpt":0.26389414738746453,"score_spread":0.2544693038203969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767694151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96889305,0.00006612675,0.000046571517,0.0013308306,0.00018715451,0.0002653678,0.0000029537523,0.000056189598,0.029151743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795561,0.00003581176,0.00014745913,0.00017111766,0.00009884629,0.000019224715,0.000015536343,0.0000057635543,0.019950159],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999069,0.00011525032,0.00012940656,0.00015767784,0.00026181535,0.00026687613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968684,0.000092463975,0.000056605215,0.00006293032,0.00004123967,0.000059915008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031341575,0.00007303538,0.00010900512,0.000039072624,0.00025144435,0.000061577695,0.00011941019,0.00015803828,0.00013508824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017899905,0.0000726232,0.00004726756,0.0001943508,0.00024112717,0.00027495858,0.000015593638,0.0001775123,0.00014385577],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002495418,0.000080334845,0.3592237,0.000034238663,0.000033373213,0.000007996914,0.34315953,0.00020194496,0.0016888587,0.26391336,0.0011058159,0.030525908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009626715,0.000038824135,0.76724976,0.000072475996,0.000019223868,7.640482e-7,0.14974087,0.00036597817,0.00068160467,0.010341547,0.070059896,0.00046634383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15430614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17358953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4080261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023388464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046599253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8513254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770740075","doi":"10.1080/01419870.2017.1400086","title":"Labour migration, sex, and polygyny: negotiating patriarchy in Tajikistan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnic and Racial Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Polygyny; Patriarchy; Negotiation; Institution; Gender studies; Sociology; Reification (Marxism); Political science; Law; Demography; Population; Social science","score_opus":0.083638196602274,"score_gpt":0.41651201075264693,"score_spread":0.3328738141503729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770740075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.947156,0.036795042,0.0000055137743,0.0116815185,0.00038303155,0.00027992454,0.000007874789,0.000037583402,0.0036535254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97226596,0.02443447,0.00009289682,0.00009729301,0.00049550534,0.000021472953,5.6799763e-7,0.0000054819498,0.002586371],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998868,0.00016294488,0.00019858732,0.00023429794,0.00022609471,0.000310064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932015,0.00026851913,0.00014632789,0.00009174742,0.00010062544,0.000072622104],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077914115,0.00013107387,0.0002845773,0.000025040697,0.0039537456,0.00017397746,0.00012494497,0.000086271524,0.0000068779223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002122196,0.000100687575,0.000029542482,0.00007333125,0.0011085419,0.00029057992,0.00022408355,0.00016016986,0.0000028192992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025692949,0.000028232793,0.2930869,0.000045560966,0.00013131343,0.000011721341,0.6285924,0.000002182409,0.000050955772,0.03199369,0.00082365994,0.045207758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005199461,0.000029957288,0.7648818,0.000045857512,0.000023599132,3.1464688e-7,0.18547781,0.000011150028,0.0000079338915,0.0032151986,0.045559123,0.00022730205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029933568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11133977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47179493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007956845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002842233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99734294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771338716","doi":"","title":"Statutes of the province of British Columbia.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.011061991967252879,"score_gpt":0.2258454273981806,"score_spread":0.2147834354309277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771338716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5814884,0.00037303593,7.530174e-7,0.0014647254,0.00028446456,0.00053343026,0.0005730386,0.000014596969,0.4152676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89873314,0.0008168441,0.00014046801,0.000069042995,0.00009329039,0.000014175631,8.31323e-7,0.000009416573,0.10012282],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986871,0.00011148323,0.0003149572,0.00015293727,0.00039050754,0.00034301012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989274,0.00018053128,0.0002960251,0.00018091156,0.0002230571,0.00019205546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002558284,0.00006994072,0.00024648145,0.000034631976,0.00024001896,0.000019276637,0.00041317547,0.000084216736,0.00020506886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065476977,0.00006234906,0.0001043538,0.00020700814,0.0010277517,0.0001322819,0.000049812083,0.000057635683,0.0000027445187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011274744,0.00008070104,0.5181286,0.00019132401,0.00017573855,0.000026295895,0.011699955,0.0000013356738,0.00043187293,0.025990034,0.33547086,0.10779206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001811213,0.000024967838,0.2796206,0.00014306568,0.000019872692,4.6473423e-7,0.0009252424,7.6662126e-8,0.000054485157,0.00069355284,0.7182226,0.000113974005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98820454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99939024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38275173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018093603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010503916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3786794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771411220","doi":"","title":"Politics and the constitution: the charter, federalism, and the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Supreme court; Political science; Constitution; Law; Politics; Charter","score_opus":0.014586119060234892,"score_gpt":0.22925503496932054,"score_spread":0.21466891590908566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771411220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12522049,0.0022455722,0.0000018280025,0.24298465,0.00049117237,0.0009718668,0.00019806363,0.000011414161,0.6278749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98699385,0.0021523656,0.000010630099,0.0011545221,0.00017773933,0.000021854106,6.1807924e-7,0.0000039337096,0.009484507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876505,0.00024241793,0.00022205329,0.00011692589,0.000314958,0.00033860482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985427,0.0008359037,0.00013825743,0.00015261963,0.00013391583,0.00019658577],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063010585,0.000106511165,0.00022910598,0.000022080896,0.0013714596,0.0000373456,0.00024396002,0.00005006611,0.000038753842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005704791,0.00004169991,0.000042090305,0.00007794451,0.0050328476,0.00007154352,0.000040314604,0.00007827451,5.5493894e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012879054,0.0000015237015,0.0025657348,0.000007449335,0.000047220292,0.0000021237763,0.01194393,1.57637e-7,0.0000014002757,0.96371347,0.021023784,0.00068031094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010674162,0.0000070339756,0.013305442,0.000028936523,0.000044393146,0.0000030819733,0.0054923818,0.000001801786,0.0000057601064,0.0034588783,0.9764885,0.00009643073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99934626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9602546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016151999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001270478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771418444","doi":"","title":"Law Reform Commission of Saskatchewan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Law; Political science; Law reform","score_opus":0.02233169521134484,"score_gpt":0.27805564388086423,"score_spread":0.2557239486695194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771418444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120884016,0.00051251566,2.694752e-7,0.0046843886,0.00048581333,0.00028421363,0.000106815074,0.000027753524,0.8730142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918845,0.0033705535,0.000471121,0.00007322786,0.00019392652,0.000012308657,0.0000063715947,0.000011486912,0.0039764605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853396,0.000072171504,0.00032399475,0.0001967248,0.00040702472,0.0004661497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983539,0.00005315112,0.00044410845,0.00045620775,0.00023328363,0.00045935225],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037578278,0.00015897432,0.00033627672,0.0003664475,0.0020159772,0.000059775273,0.0007727276,0.0001850694,0.000121453195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023273414,0.00013186428,0.00020656962,0.0005220278,0.0028165164,0.00032094863,0.00007841834,0.00011721303,0.000006827265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006190536,0.00014950392,0.2563918,0.00022060057,0.00039894448,0.000036711393,0.15610667,8.4394225e-7,0.00039281926,0.5225456,0.041783903,0.021910742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017299832,0.00003860145,0.09756787,0.00005089562,0.00002800258,2.2243742e-7,0.020386094,1.8023239e-7,0.00012591913,0.0007856452,0.880667,0.000176613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98821676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9968087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8710005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013906033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002583211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771757530","doi":"10.1007/s10691-018-9364-5","title":"Judging in Marriage’s Shadow","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cohabitation; Shadow (psychology); Openness to experience; Operationalization; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Law; Property (philosophy); Diversity (politics); Political science; Social psychology; Gender studies; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.062378099473101266,"score_gpt":0.37685382608982915,"score_spread":0.3144757266167279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771757530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39595708,0.0042255484,0.0000064939672,0.015634965,0.0023766865,0.0006034031,0.000013151103,0.0003171275,0.58086556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98839504,0.0004988414,0.00038535995,0.00068417727,0.0015388364,0.000067434936,0.0000011080175,0.000014105481,0.008415102],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790984,0.00018345013,0.00033554534,0.00039272188,0.00048326884,0.000695195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991225,0.0002912433,0.000107048174,0.0001512302,0.00022458479,0.00010338793],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084384746,0.00021906984,0.00040059653,0.00006293087,0.0019807112,0.00013597326,0.0003289435,0.00009996606,0.00017257173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015211343,0.0001810845,0.000093935814,0.00049560785,0.001910982,0.0002685669,0.00027376975,0.00021554207,0.00032875536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100411635,0.000197728,0.19024171,0.00008047614,0.00041563637,0.00012891974,0.5813553,0.0000027272595,0.00020720741,0.125283,0.08915447,0.012832429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043548841,0.00009214155,0.04201896,0.00010919355,0.000026219364,0.0000013142484,0.13063958,0.0000065916183,0.00012367913,0.0012890768,0.82485,0.00040771204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011524782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045970883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7356956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004954587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066903485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772613778","doi":"10.51644/mwyf2203","title":"The Crucifixion in Matthew and the Theology of the Cross in Canada Today","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Consensus","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.02523755488948634,"score_gpt":0.3144090435610515,"score_spread":0.28917148867156517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772613778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93020093,0.0011634645,3.414168e-8,0.05423183,0.00039092786,0.00026013958,0.0000031573018,0.0000022745578,0.013747248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985152,0.00024695427,0.000002879076,0.00017000036,0.000030129102,0.000011175477,3.5192176e-8,0.000002045732,0.001021611],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897605,0.0004198631,0.0001545585,0.00009242426,0.00015244276,0.00020465467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983027,0.0012680576,0.00013278422,0.00023203412,0.000046107394,0.0000182934],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009265105,0.000057101453,0.00013036329,0.00000402417,0.0016524572,0.00006138578,0.00043008255,0.000037249767,0.000008097877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018868893,0.000022853748,0.000025731457,0.000041115858,0.0033765014,0.00001876191,0.00017030878,0.00012999926,9.154868e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011524164,0.0000078169205,0.849625,0.000007864193,0.000022820861,0.000007907555,0.032110784,0.000011913447,0.000034634224,0.11092253,0.0018075805,0.0053259153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005493395,0.0000021809342,0.9702494,0.000016903261,0.0000036177366,7.7865457e-7,0.012153983,0.000023994275,0.000037107842,0.0056175287,0.011299393,0.000045784975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97797936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12062439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014274183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027837028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774018368","doi":"","title":"Ontario. Legislative Assembly. Select Committee on Constitutional Reform","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Legislative assembly; General assembly; Public administration; Law; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.031193738358511316,"score_gpt":0.28358908336297406,"score_spread":0.25239534500446276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774018368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09598176,0.00017245385,0.000001047104,0.006899897,0.00077446835,0.0003694336,0.0001251749,0.000033321692,0.89564246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838729,0.001737212,0.00031359203,0.00025055496,0.00035805782,0.000035768015,0.000018299545,0.000008791309,0.01340485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981553,0.00009219403,0.0002799248,0.00029678352,0.00053820503,0.0006375847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841356,0.00011395128,0.00035829915,0.00036299395,0.00029267656,0.0004585326],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038181458,0.00022538337,0.00033325556,0.00056998676,0.0038937419,0.00014571428,0.00068637956,0.00020122848,0.0003075823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004576841,0.00019423876,0.00021453203,0.0005597985,0.004765382,0.00043159793,0.000054108932,0.00026362477,0.00004929465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029405224,0.000053743774,0.25747034,0.000011478913,0.0002446654,0.000031504078,0.020111578,0.000001277337,0.000008902585,0.65945494,0.059916217,0.002665979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019719743,0.000055191213,0.249102,0.000032012653,0.000023615019,5.4016306e-7,0.0016169403,2.235403e-7,0.0000102870945,0.0005437988,0.7482109,0.00020730581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99184394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8878911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085642247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011451154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774451565","doi":"10.1163/22134514-00404001","title":"Tribal Courts, Restorative Justice and Native Land Claims","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Restorative justice; Political science; Sovereignty; Federal jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Treaty; Economic Justice; Devolution (biology); Government (linguistics); Eminent domain; Sociology; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.06678477496682644,"score_gpt":0.3497930897305864,"score_spread":0.28300831476376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774451565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7641539,0.0040131127,0.00009463097,0.005005984,0.0004540005,0.00014436955,0.000026651063,0.00000930589,0.22609806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960526,0.001425223,0.00035281814,0.00020829309,0.0005433946,5.417495e-7,2.2335274e-7,0.000005697558,0.0014111742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843967,0.0006142275,0.00025810482,0.00014163906,0.00036266356,0.00018368743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982546,0.00023286161,0.00089824083,0.00009001992,0.00037520257,0.00014906884],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008935844,0.00013599246,0.0003262843,0.000007742092,0.0021985471,0.00030635984,0.00028565302,0.000021548161,0.00001278546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022619608,0.00009742556,0.00004724409,0.00002791669,0.001489045,0.0007400864,0.000100838435,0.00026807305,0.000006711266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005182316,0.00010559227,0.00873403,0.000038638118,0.00030902118,0.00029131467,0.16535664,0.000017749346,0.0001388959,0.8027254,0.019366914,0.0023976034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018308731,0.00037832645,0.49171066,0.00021009028,0.00012801873,0.000014046789,0.009013514,0.000016422367,0.0001002437,0.0019250021,0.4943958,0.0002769949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035291526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012394504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8008004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006664184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003966478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775341244","doi":"","title":"L’Adoption Coutumière Autochtone En Droit Civil Québécois (Aboriginal Customary Adoption in Quebec Civil Law)","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Civil code; Ethnology; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012231628454707072,"score_gpt":0.2926983594370931,"score_spread":0.28046673098238606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775341244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.841474,0.045645125,0.00044193436,0.056173794,0.004934749,0.00092604815,0.000028406737,0.00014890019,0.050227024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89402086,0.05391703,0.00008907537,0.00016143348,0.0032258166,0.00003119694,0.00000928351,0.000046931513,0.048498385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919564,0.0007971412,0.00083662267,0.00062054535,0.0012223573,0.004566917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976639,0.0001778061,0.001027306,0.00043333482,0.00036817565,0.00032944305],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045541865,0.00055816944,0.000715653,0.00012172774,0.004226146,0.00072252774,0.0012253966,0.0006272567,0.00030145078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029708634,0.00054668833,0.0004147105,0.00032874782,0.0015240603,0.0027741706,0.00015285559,0.0045454954,0.00031311405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013034172,0.00034628427,0.0075201546,0.000054487475,0.0003628444,0.000059541097,0.021564705,0.0001275576,0.00016843317,0.9097724,0.0007424939,0.05915076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044364985,0.0008745821,0.18797815,0.0010906868,0.0006123353,0.00032089563,0.09982551,0.0005501065,0.000032172156,0.13275683,0.5694514,0.0020708183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80183303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.993061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77701557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017979179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005698423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2776271098","doi":"","title":"Canada. Parliament. Senate. Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.0143312980784976,"score_gpt":0.23514069162671264,"score_spread":0.22080939354821505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2776271098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25968313,0.0019855981,0.000009955198,0.061004892,0.001668763,0.0007548998,0.0015108451,0.000079524056,0.67330235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99151945,0.006125524,0.00008738854,0.00029621023,0.00018549192,0.000016320366,0.0000045338575,0.0000072420116,0.0017578307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983617,0.00010033148,0.00023864814,0.0002476529,0.00050321454,0.00054846425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887574,0.00021776976,0.00012920212,0.00011966208,0.00012897134,0.0005286606],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023610736,0.00017774667,0.00023657875,0.00043278647,0.0009126717,0.000043200012,0.00019462207,0.00010198469,0.00013695935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002765741,0.0001280305,0.00006976152,0.00078426884,0.004364948,0.00019542674,0.000028580544,0.00008786873,0.0000039138245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017131553,0.000015123922,0.07164205,0.000015201087,0.0001137367,0.00003701697,0.001363936,5.3942284e-7,0.00004863479,0.7366872,0.18750289,0.0025565426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028522272,0.000026873517,0.015737763,0.000074504496,0.000018635243,0.0000011260519,0.0051506315,1.193425e-7,0.00003193347,0.0002361575,0.97821826,0.00021876967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99236894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7907154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004483663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014426317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2776499986","doi":"","title":"Canadian Bar Association. Committee on the Constitution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Political science; Law; Geography; Philosophy; Epistemology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.02225858791491755,"score_gpt":0.25905644196071254,"score_spread":0.23679785404579498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2776499986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06883193,0.00026291827,1.524454e-7,0.105731085,0.001113427,0.00046134138,0.00026361545,0.000028432043,0.8233071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98814195,0.0042491877,0.00005012354,0.0010308259,0.00039702686,0.000038001763,0.0000098511955,0.000008452722,0.0060745636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981728,0.0001829946,0.00023507341,0.00021398209,0.00048395953,0.00071119657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980122,0.00028669098,0.00035945748,0.0004245525,0.00028528497,0.0006318178],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079481356,0.00017200407,0.00022821895,0.000524945,0.006453346,0.00023852996,0.000831896,0.00022429341,0.00037386222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024987923,0.00013158229,0.0001746222,0.00059232145,0.0014326174,0.00024378646,0.000031114538,0.00021680695,0.00010002234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025546801,0.000009206273,0.34470102,0.000004263003,0.00010185921,0.000008837672,0.0039484855,9.92275e-7,0.0000015904561,0.35740852,0.292846,0.000966681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008787188,0.000013534591,0.2344819,0.000018558032,0.00002399686,1.3147744e-7,0.002350791,3.842705e-7,0.000003692269,0.000560489,0.76231635,0.00014233199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99768275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91931003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008904552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010200476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99484015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2777629159","doi":"","title":"The revised statutes of New Brunswick","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.022632421529018714,"score_gpt":0.26659648172331113,"score_spread":0.24396406019429243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2777629159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08736814,0.0024734645,0.000004561347,0.021310743,0.0005294782,0.00063584326,0.000045426925,0.00003970006,0.8875927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66667736,0.01885022,0.00062466157,0.00037102692,0.00083356723,0.00001614615,0.0000026145347,0.00003012574,0.31259432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852717,0.00011644672,0.00032962125,0.00016143527,0.00037270517,0.00049260864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984504,0.00047495312,0.00023790891,0.00021283951,0.00016866981,0.00045520611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041280364,0.00012134438,0.00023675169,0.00007575917,0.0005417274,0.000023670944,0.00041730373,0.00008491167,0.00018700508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012130655,0.00006805072,0.000103774364,0.0002293062,0.00063100643,0.00014088245,0.00003127338,0.00006637345,0.000026585487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002725921,0.000014771062,0.047427718,0.000034070712,0.00013225837,0.000008675228,0.024181457,5.5914234e-7,0.00010762389,0.5385979,0.23555316,0.1539146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001890547,0.00002115448,0.04679007,0.00005098976,0.00001630657,1.4776221e-7,0.0011051652,7.2996954e-8,0.000042818425,0.0013972822,0.9502766,0.00011032704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9343056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98707974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71472347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022460207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023071077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41665843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2777969974","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttx189","title":"The rights of unmarried cohabitants in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Political science; Socioeconomics; Geography; Law; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.02349824235038778,"score_gpt":0.30121249559153,"score_spread":0.27771425324114224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2777969974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93468463,0.00035831245,1.207443e-7,0.0036940342,0.00058600865,0.00026656745,0.0000125025035,0.00001357719,0.060384247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968896,0.00014433317,0.000028449655,0.000032768698,0.000105962776,0.000015826003,4.6896898e-7,0.0000052340047,0.0027773713],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848187,0.00014629707,0.00026594303,0.00016707841,0.00052110263,0.0004176871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988906,0.00034163214,0.00024327399,0.00032820352,0.00010743943,0.00008889542],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004414001,0.00011932785,0.00024126621,0.000013340597,0.0028215798,0.0001062547,0.0008028475,0.000058428384,0.000098556586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068876264,0.00007237562,0.00004955407,0.000064252155,0.0007375933,0.00019566383,0.00010497542,0.00013310913,0.000009132122],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010674669,0.00006207073,0.8496616,0.000033154607,0.00015187079,0.0000458458,0.04312478,0.000020942723,0.000096730146,0.07209194,0.012153468,0.022450875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044692322,0.000011807218,0.8928162,0.000037990314,0.000013689212,2.2354143e-7,0.011607528,0.000015859907,0.0002902968,0.0020062737,0.09258338,0.0001698356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08042991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056574924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053462776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778461173","doi":"10.1177/092405190001800403","title":"Multiculturalism, Human Rights, and Cultural Relativism: Canadian Civic Leaders Discuss Women's Rights and Gay and Lesbian Rights","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Lesbian; Cultural relativism; Human rights; Relativism; Ethnic group; Sociology; Minority rights; Political science; Citizenship; Gender studies; Homosexuality; Law; Perspective (graphical); Politics","score_opus":0.02340903723594115,"score_gpt":0.29607799619340064,"score_spread":0.27266895895745946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778461173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843025,0.00042641966,2.7969406e-7,0.0011053012,0.00013672413,0.0007517659,0.000042504347,0.0001325638,0.013101948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803431,0.000014020267,0.00008093867,0.000043608525,0.00038214258,0.00004784682,0.000046536978,0.000023164162,0.019018624],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607575,0.00051206455,0.000675424,0.0008850037,0.0006491932,0.001202569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817485,0.00015368691,0.00024512285,0.0003048433,0.00017399919,0.0009475239],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041634165,0.00065083575,0.0008636853,0.0001707918,0.0075137895,0.00038857566,0.0003755377,0.00043466274,0.0008152093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005327165,0.0003868177,0.00013055016,0.00023070541,0.0035897645,0.001007451,0.000026473565,0.0004861219,0.000030445111],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005787198,0.00014884907,0.0017728108,0.000089022855,0.0003981543,0.0000809458,0.96746385,0.0000013797378,0.00056317734,0.024185134,0.0035562003,0.0016825747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010321026,0.004096631,0.11790755,0.00082910154,0.0005616681,0.000071123024,0.06326415,0.000074936244,0.0004166126,0.20455866,0.59323406,0.0046645147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6159722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90785474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9041997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003543416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002814412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779615805","doi":"","title":"Statutes of Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.015178446453571437,"score_gpt":0.23935585447260557,"score_spread":0.22417740801903413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779615805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12811098,0.00033824253,0.0000013452687,0.0066004954,0.00037909293,0.00024941476,0.00023957615,0.000017522509,0.8640633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9372938,0.0008736709,0.0002151087,0.00018235538,0.00018103066,0.000012871519,0.0000020701927,0.000011538237,0.061227504],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985476,0.0000753775,0.00027578787,0.00015669617,0.00043073302,0.00051377737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877733,0.0002329323,0.00017722923,0.00014624007,0.00019960926,0.00046667128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022558453,0.00011338853,0.0002467041,0.00010516646,0.0002893897,0.000007520262,0.00027766926,0.00007409943,0.0003958192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007244637,0.000080634585,0.000055360757,0.00020927686,0.00038103832,0.00011992933,0.000023748096,0.00005122241,0.0000049858586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022604572,0.000030994997,0.10269507,0.00007749457,0.00020138347,0.000054767806,0.022734828,0.0000026327307,0.00030497334,0.37689465,0.45440817,0.04257242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013728961,0.000013654774,0.04589468,0.00003541873,0.000011294628,1.8905271e-7,0.0012915847,8.426827e-8,0.00010709818,0.0005151036,0.95186,0.00013356563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99930286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8091829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005606613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034235565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6073242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780547325","doi":"","title":"The local and private statutes of New Brunswick.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.016244341644738272,"score_gpt":0.2514804239920463,"score_spread":0.23523608234730803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780547325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45205146,0.0032800469,0.000044202243,0.020909676,0.00047494457,0.0006911313,0.000052766358,0.0000432134,0.5224526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9397092,0.008010064,0.0003178724,0.00013436002,0.0002007337,0.000005621693,8.256725e-7,0.000012818399,0.051608518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886996,0.00007320149,0.00023630202,0.00014627603,0.00027056198,0.0004037101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988724,0.0003443488,0.00014745044,0.00013641416,0.000088702385,0.00041071416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002802202,0.00010534125,0.00018653825,0.000058296628,0.00045749955,0.000021496244,0.00024674504,0.00007544121,0.00005522848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047553942,0.000059202,0.00004985097,0.00013979788,0.0010720479,0.00012812513,0.00004056572,0.000057526806,0.0000070404544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002195333,0.000009084944,0.075936586,0.00002281588,0.0000992218,0.0000079143665,0.020587934,6.7304813e-7,0.00006696369,0.6504422,0.035525568,0.2172791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017463825,0.00002373077,0.08876767,0.000030618008,0.000013135566,2.833189e-7,0.0013291502,2.3407866e-7,0.000052174506,0.0024359433,0.9070745,0.00009793628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9034757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9849863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8715489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000141658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011246005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39500052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782614011","doi":"","title":"The Role of Religion in the Law of Royal Succession in Canada and Australia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological succession; Commonwealth; Law; Constitution; Political science; Scrutiny; Common law; Sociology","score_opus":0.012194579175248238,"score_gpt":0.2939854007706863,"score_spread":0.28179082159543806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782614011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99285066,0.0021986724,2.3190161e-7,0.0027878894,0.000058605692,0.00007828842,5.6536356e-7,6.8157436e-7,0.002024391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960206,0.0036999206,0.000002024728,0.00001078716,0.000049795588,0.000001715242,8.010542e-8,0.0000016541999,0.00021340698],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986707,0.00017864774,0.00017844538,0.000057675217,0.00029387555,0.00062063965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995366,0.00010680789,0.00021213014,0.00008061967,0.000043256,0.000020627222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017834542,0.00004995822,0.00010185477,0.000008142444,0.0009157851,0.000049383732,0.00039649595,0.000030674993,0.000002084923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016586248,0.000025274703,0.000023768987,0.000040791143,0.00026409398,0.00009744351,0.00003381737,0.00053425814,1.702688e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003813552,0.000018010747,0.5750499,0.000003383573,0.000024574476,0.0000019266172,0.00934012,0.000014015458,0.0001319924,0.4090871,0.000117840566,0.0061730007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064771174,0.00009851512,0.7143774,0.00008354725,0.000018137389,0.000006040773,0.12241492,0.000022696775,0.00025277145,0.15106344,0.010876001,0.00013881802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99526584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25802365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069240853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009801075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7043571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783656184","doi":"","title":"Translating the Conflict over Trinity Western University's Proposed Law School","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisprudence; Statutory law; Political science; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Public law; Appeal; Sociology; Common law","score_opus":0.034728431730384104,"score_gpt":0.31589921171628577,"score_spread":0.2811707799859017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783656184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8850093,0.0010963822,0.00017652691,0.03418898,0.00040554593,0.0005409751,0.000004291302,0.000080934085,0.07849707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892631,0.0014555206,0.000015659192,0.00011786677,0.00053420715,6.131751e-7,3.2272592e-7,0.000008089085,0.0086045815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974323,0.0003182327,0.00014883389,0.00015424662,0.0004299935,0.0015164227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992263,0.00008320552,0.00026136794,0.0001849264,0.00011887498,0.00012533453],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020981084,0.00012590675,0.00016619053,0.000015938573,0.009413251,0.00042433842,0.0008683662,0.000087476335,0.00006320689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000250107,0.000083391395,0.00015362201,0.00005971527,0.00069427467,0.00063672307,0.0000653649,0.0015775616,0.00003562247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014343487,0.0000779274,0.06454273,0.00000767351,0.0005717421,0.000019571724,0.034023345,0.000007867681,0.00034829593,0.88474673,0.00017324317,0.015337411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048232917,0.0003437258,0.12587176,0.00009452572,0.00030166368,0.00004938916,0.15294954,0.000024406561,0.00009258958,0.03982064,0.6747647,0.0008637514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01699001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18686461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8449261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011993448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011370442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99187636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783926903","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0025","title":"Women’s rights and minorities’ rights in Canada. The challenges of intersectionality in Supreme Court jurisprudence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Intersectionality; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Adjudication; Gender equality; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.034550493574795255,"score_gpt":0.3060064664540142,"score_spread":0.27145597287921897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783926903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95472187,0.0010260693,1.4568504e-7,0.020136226,0.00023425899,0.00023738522,0.000010685684,0.00000877553,0.023624603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905103,0.00038716878,0.000011738057,0.00004769351,0.00012095793,0.000048720587,1.8235595e-7,0.000002908053,0.00032957757],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985354,0.0002415036,0.00018650903,0.0002988435,0.00041779896,0.00031997127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922884,0.0002607151,0.00013464532,0.00019548941,0.000113553135,0.00006673715],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000499358,0.00013410175,0.00024908574,0.00003602736,0.0014441,0.000098403594,0.00035319937,0.00005734076,0.000043451426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023034558,0.0000902463,0.00003198057,0.00004517869,0.00080002,0.00024913158,0.00008232975,0.00021763277,0.0000011961707],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056075165,0.00009447341,0.019001082,0.000016459064,0.00004503871,0.000014063341,0.66188276,0.0000035835503,0.0000114356135,0.3182891,0.00040549817,0.00018041913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034986722,0.000025328884,0.681715,0.00006144806,0.0000027713031,5.255763e-7,0.29464993,0.000006070229,0.000029486404,0.019020295,0.003997046,0.0001422281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99140334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66271394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021034663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016728397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784948189","doi":"10.29173/alr1359","title":"Disclosure and Production in Sexual Violence Cases: Situating Stinchcombe","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Plaintiff; Law; Context (archaeology); Deference; Legislature; Supreme court; Sociology; Sexual violence; Political science; Criminology; History","score_opus":0.05268396725805665,"score_gpt":0.3262055393352087,"score_spread":0.27352157207715205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784948189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7931031,0.1634324,2.8280974e-7,0.025755124,0.00021023622,0.0012375783,0.000001753806,0.000042194304,0.016217297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9148513,0.083366856,0.00007115846,0.000556311,0.00013809596,0.00005516168,0.0000016612489,0.0000060769853,0.00095338264],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987509,0.00025470127,0.00024330478,0.00028305178,0.00021770349,0.00025029556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934924,0.00032275027,0.000092681265,0.00011678746,0.000052120376,0.00006639951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045274306,0.00011870344,0.00026136107,0.000007800407,0.00048488754,0.000037712864,0.00010695211,0.00003115478,0.00016682093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019884878,0.00008963376,0.000029749139,0.00024657336,0.0002656057,0.00028920767,0.00005639997,0.00012471358,0.00005972551],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006440929,0.00033368633,0.11014188,0.004917232,0.0000932241,0.000065217646,0.063290164,0.000005424674,0.00005503705,0.052489754,0.008216257,0.7603857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006301462,0.0001858489,0.018948004,0.022217404,0.00030138588,0.00010758889,0.01746611,0.00006649265,0.000026144986,0.0009000424,0.93766654,0.0014842936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13084672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2770226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9294503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007628849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007077783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87494105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2786400951","doi":"","title":"Beyond Beyond Conjugality","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Hindsight bias; Politics; Commission; Political science; Law; Relevance (law); State (computer science); Medicine; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.031094565741678827,"score_gpt":0.3047098728487075,"score_spread":0.27361530710702864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2786400951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34305468,0.00026237537,0.000017585675,0.009778697,0.00025247136,0.00015256359,0.000011740416,0.000048688456,0.6464212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764146,0.00043458972,0.00080204185,0.000035908768,0.00010187147,1.5255476e-7,0.00000154878,0.0000038632515,0.022205412],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902064,0.00009609164,0.000059313377,0.00020413936,0.0003455352,0.00027426166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990695,0.000056110406,0.00022723025,0.00032867858,0.0001766282,0.00014184558],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003418156,0.00009888483,0.00022743973,0.000006692699,0.0033562544,0.00005449794,0.0007120432,0.00009653031,0.008364941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001807195,0.000110491914,0.00012245988,0.000017544464,0.0012457449,0.0009789569,0.00026794383,0.00008008532,0.000058430982],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017738536,0.00024765023,0.11564054,0.00007510486,0.0004379876,0.000047551297,0.5617803,0.0000029159958,0.0007225523,0.14407149,0.027857257,0.14893927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038568504,0.000027255863,0.8995521,0.000009687406,0.000039427192,1.1474592e-7,0.059554394,0.000005873638,0.000018574323,0.00025258982,0.040000215,0.00015404813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79351276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7046239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7839116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040234686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006070057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99794126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2786801026","doi":"10.7202/1042929ar","title":"Alice au pays des merveilles dans le monde juridique","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Alice (programming language); Humanities; Adventure; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Art; Art history; Theology","score_opus":0.025477249381486287,"score_gpt":0.27768676451510294,"score_spread":0.25220951513361667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2786801026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79351604,0.007078268,0.00039685282,0.016697409,0.0013096008,0.00045101697,0.000060746333,0.00017848672,0.18031158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93833864,0.004107955,0.0027390951,0.00032583726,0.0040676086,0.00006564762,0.000009237072,0.00004930615,0.050296668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668133,0.0005412811,0.000473943,0.00059765077,0.00036896678,0.0013367966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840367,0.0002577081,0.00024392988,0.0003554626,0.0003135085,0.00042571616],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009150883,0.00030475605,0.0005232877,0.000043972617,0.0025708692,0.00013849113,0.0006630593,0.00040977861,0.0003144344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047909428,0.00039532888,0.0003508531,0.00067293306,0.0041242344,0.0005685209,0.0002204193,0.00034556317,0.00081427913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004468544,0.00053373317,0.037306115,0.00061818963,0.0005156082,0.0001203822,0.4120158,0.00006476485,0.0064707054,0.49795887,0.01651719,0.027833967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011380039,0.00048736154,0.11922556,0.0010408765,0.00039848103,0.00008891289,0.07979627,0.00048404196,0.012550221,0.10391082,0.67887014,0.002009301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09982856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.090619005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.662353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024509204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044090746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787256313","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0048","title":"The Rule of Law, the Separation of Powers and Judicial Independence in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Separation of powers; Law; Constitutionalism; Political science; Constitutional law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Judicial independence; Constitution; Constitutional economics; Judicial review; Constitutional theory; Rule of law; Public law; Enumerated powers; Legislature; Federalism; Law and economics; Democracy; Sovereignty; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02760788342213357,"score_gpt":0.25797932639672777,"score_spread":0.2303714429745942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787256313","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003314369,0.00014956074,6.88778e-7,0.00024049803,0.00012252157,0.0002893747,0.000039211336,0.00000387962,0.9958399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43666908,0.0010758938,0.000009006188,0.000021181848,0.000042895983,5.9559204e-7,0.0000015752389,0.0000055643795,0.5621742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999161,0.000056620745,0.0001198547,0.00012705484,0.00039623227,0.0001392567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917114,0.00018116033,0.00032282225,0.00016089826,0.00012978325,0.000034216566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021950097,0.00010158786,0.00019248908,0.000012392843,0.0010298315,0.00002292568,0.00045931072,0.00012361993,0.00000414272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003436785,0.00007099974,0.0000449074,0.000003236492,0.0012206527,0.00007013025,0.00019820161,0.00020166875,3.3001808e-8],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046045683,0.0000016834481,0.00016065945,0.000013193502,0.00006249135,0.000006446579,0.00988525,0.0000037371628,0.0000044783233,0.9867066,0.00027090992,0.0028384912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013709666,0.000009620783,0.00080716715,0.00005211604,0.000038256392,1.197944e-7,0.002790108,0.0000040968775,0.00002113563,0.0006567904,0.99539447,0.000089036075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93971974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9852893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99512357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030789306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044975826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79207355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787498572","doi":"","title":"Comment on Patrick Macklem’s “Indigenous Peoples and Ethos of Legal Pluralism in Canada”","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Padua  Archive (University of Padua)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Indigenous; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Environmental ethics; Legal pluralism; Sociology; Ethnology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Comparative law; Legal realism","score_opus":0.04272550115702171,"score_gpt":0.3101679604066816,"score_spread":0.26744245924965987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787498572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9693996,0.000081491264,0.00016883037,0.023383787,0.00004469177,0.00056340493,0.00009397378,0.000011786556,0.0062524904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973998,0.00090718915,0.0012372556,0.00009567009,0.000034282937,0.000001276113,0.0000085370075,0.0000062285853,0.00030975923],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963754,0.0014753131,0.00015221298,0.00027999337,0.001122715,0.0005943849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971718,0.0021046617,0.000108194734,0.00016897364,0.00022101018,0.00022536652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014471815,0.000117823874,0.0003284189,0.0002022959,0.0009365253,0.00001777696,0.0004467178,0.00005499084,0.00005420716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059731706,0.00012072487,0.0000654365,0.00037745823,0.0009919922,0.00012847016,0.0003292192,0.00040521525,0.0000057061557],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004428752,0.00038653475,0.27230152,0.00038999508,0.0001934386,0.0001404384,0.62373304,0.000093470204,0.0025434496,0.051248018,0.024722464,0.023804743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001342017,0.00039845394,0.56993526,0.00021467086,0.000018284438,7.371507e-7,0.34739602,0.0004731549,0.00012130301,0.001540035,0.078257225,0.00030286427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9865024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9868553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2976337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006267999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007841721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.720309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788603151","doi":"","title":"The Canadian constitutions, 1763-1982","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02186289806599572,"score_gpt":0.2617317443754336,"score_spread":0.2398688463094379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788603151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009065892,0.0007352718,0.0000014243932,0.03391426,0.0007977362,0.00044877653,0.00019665495,0.00003911924,0.95480084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9232836,0.0027845614,0.00011063144,0.0005853595,0.00043678144,0.000053753225,0.0000042775555,0.000013281206,0.072727755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980831,0.00014705035,0.00028402134,0.00021647179,0.00038542273,0.00088391296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979219,0.00034885094,0.00012628906,0.0002457342,0.0002321761,0.0011250366],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005411938,0.00015497331,0.00019416369,0.00018166254,0.003631146,0.000084158986,0.0004961824,0.00015573467,0.0002771206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012908889,0.000093497736,0.00009744683,0.0003017991,0.0017640815,0.0001834733,0.000025169455,0.0001193963,0.00016478736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030449207,0.0000042496335,0.016339904,0.000004038818,0.00005184973,0.00002347564,0.003808984,5.5029165e-7,0.000006334388,0.8473099,0.110672966,0.02177469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013157111,0.000009689952,0.018704725,0.000026480498,0.000015908294,0.0000010827113,0.0010637706,1.7965839e-7,0.000005609331,0.0014094751,0.97846097,0.00017051914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99855757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9142177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014442402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004482429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789164846","doi":"","title":"Supreme Court of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.020998383352644593,"score_gpt":0.26809355468644164,"score_spread":0.24709517133379705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789164846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18917443,0.00017557418,2.9973472e-7,0.011507543,0.00066600397,0.0001705391,0.000086579545,0.000006768383,0.7982123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98335546,0.00051283045,0.00016893815,0.00010183447,0.00023400095,0.0000060622156,0.00000218594,0.0000069961507,0.015611667],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875426,0.000050272476,0.00021182236,0.00013262166,0.00042588683,0.00042515085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987419,0.00007491708,0.0002776197,0.0002776421,0.0002127884,0.00041512868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027919363,0.000094181705,0.00023180697,0.000060413175,0.0011521039,0.00002659513,0.00058574363,0.00007386166,0.0004071178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013263089,0.00008823223,0.000053485357,0.00010696477,0.000535519,0.00016271826,0.000037571397,0.000085371474,0.000004759074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011464866,0.000028432729,0.21338929,0.00006575596,0.00015140903,0.000068611225,0.03339632,0.000013646964,0.00004979643,0.08865963,0.6564646,0.0077010496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009470539,0.000007905441,0.14357321,0.000015009981,0.000010554754,1.4512955e-7,0.0019445751,0.0000010746056,0.00004096826,0.00016488014,0.85404426,0.00010267889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79418105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003646906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003102828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8861168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789252371","doi":"","title":"The consolidated orders in council of Canada : under the authority and direction of his excellency the governor-general in council","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Governor; Political science; Law; Public administration; Management; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.032410787523865406,"score_gpt":0.23281185460963913,"score_spread":0.2004010670857737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789252371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7712723,0.0012150701,2.2470168e-7,0.017830633,0.00035100107,0.00045339644,0.000098298726,0.0000054937714,0.2087736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802076,0.0025603876,0.000004890996,0.0001013679,0.000052543648,0.000023649442,5.0822257e-7,0.0000065649488,0.017042458],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785316,0.00030992666,0.0003667803,0.00016051244,0.0009144759,0.0003951477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982799,0.0007214897,0.00019116014,0.00017763725,0.0005074696,0.00012229053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017230248,0.00012302576,0.00022937963,0.00002679313,0.00050043047,0.000014405641,0.0003031533,0.00008446749,0.00003096527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013536699,0.0000594874,0.000034305052,0.00034218613,0.0010162599,0.00008059717,0.000034792403,0.00012749777,3.4842853e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021277559,0.000106997846,0.26881385,0.00012987688,0.0003887245,0.000030318024,0.18211044,0.00007712648,0.0007875361,0.26180622,0.26005363,0.025482494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003199794,0.000016708054,0.15915291,0.000038592996,0.000016105896,3.946537e-7,0.008841969,0.0000061089445,0.000023426595,0.00063636154,0.8308305,0.00011693166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9993061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5707769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040582875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01152888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789423786","doi":"","title":"The consolidated statutes of New Brunswick.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.021870464732610055,"score_gpt":0.2671398320158382,"score_spread":0.24526936728322812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789423786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1868018,0.0013310538,0.0000031224606,0.014440689,0.00052187615,0.00050981506,0.000077618046,0.000044749195,0.7962693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8393746,0.006395341,0.00024222843,0.00019589515,0.00034142504,0.00000874134,0.000002852325,0.000018229523,0.1534207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855316,0.00011208764,0.00031813246,0.00015968886,0.0003443437,0.0005125822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984455,0.00047603107,0.00022484253,0.00019764228,0.00019622469,0.0004597359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031689455,0.00012431917,0.00023052505,0.00008509541,0.0005454719,0.000025059317,0.00040146158,0.000094347306,0.00021297052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089704717,0.0000707397,0.000085811145,0.00024270407,0.0008776773,0.00014000354,0.000033591892,0.0000684341,0.000028237793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036946476,0.0000201244,0.04943267,0.000021279853,0.00021446662,0.000014258842,0.0350418,6.1140804e-7,0.00022395664,0.5813426,0.24691936,0.086731926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021306056,0.000021589636,0.036707193,0.000032792424,0.000018277764,2.623575e-7,0.0019565758,9.144924e-8,0.00012255604,0.0013604708,0.959448,0.00011913663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9484248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99080247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71252865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019713688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026163214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4641242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789472579","doi":"","title":"The consolidated statutes of Canada : proclaimed and published under the authority of the act 22 Vict. cap. 29, A.D. 1859.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.01252560757571194,"score_gpt":0.23675870876172314,"score_spread":0.2242331011860112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789472579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62958676,0.0010584131,7.211952e-7,0.05858248,0.00073150254,0.0013189381,0.00041704183,0.000021328768,0.30828282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842148,0.0005662498,0.000019755898,0.00020472115,0.00008239805,0.000028415092,0.0000016774804,0.000010543323,0.014871434],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785596,0.00034694775,0.00040956365,0.000203608,0.0006276913,0.0005562193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976068,0.0009508315,0.0004069641,0.0003358654,0.0004054757,0.00029406577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007836107,0.00016504011,0.00029148627,0.00004259295,0.0012853161,0.000052615822,0.00069276,0.00010368096,0.00009745049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014797472,0.000070641916,0.00007341204,0.0003462012,0.001828271,0.00017595959,0.00009759351,0.00016468098,4.7304522e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009664272,0.000054633703,0.10893867,0.00013439616,0.0008045117,0.00000979329,0.0524628,0.0000052379432,0.00064127066,0.39216772,0.4291197,0.015564631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026915903,0.00001852322,0.18529311,0.000046526693,0.0000489027,6.57336e-7,0.00813887,0.0000010375445,0.00027032217,0.0017667124,0.803989,0.00015718373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9918277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.390401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040750802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005041147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9885742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789505987","doi":"","title":"Reports of the Nova Scotia Advisory Committees on Constitutional Issues","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Advisory committee; Political science; Nova (rocket); Public administration; Geography; Engineering; Aeronautics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02572364698417478,"score_gpt":0.27521152455089803,"score_spread":0.24948787756672325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789505987","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18734245,0.00049583585,0.000001195574,0.012041325,0.0011421693,0.0004176738,0.00008251524,0.000023920897,0.7984529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763995,0.00026895895,0.0000938256,0.00028288542,0.00023984167,0.000005873434,0.0000013524508,0.0000063006037,0.022701506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985007,0.00012754333,0.00034939745,0.00019152963,0.0004961497,0.00033465435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883956,0.00021462733,0.00029048717,0.0002518853,0.00019114956,0.0002122979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003505392,0.00012893177,0.00023796302,0.00009681007,0.00039034008,0.000011966806,0.00028768042,0.000101793856,0.00041436832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00097231305,0.000075122734,0.00011955632,0.00019502816,0.0024534797,0.000114679744,0.000040699964,0.00008724847,0.00002620678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001181121,0.000042550713,0.25383484,0.000031119467,0.000095396594,0.000033438722,0.0073439265,0.000004364178,0.00015201943,0.6149422,0.11920882,0.004299555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012044648,0.00002027751,0.12243933,0.00014895177,0.000017387074,0.0000019362858,0.0006259244,4.7617164e-8,0.00016909048,0.0012588269,0.87506765,0.00013013835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7395158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92985135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.789057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025002725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007994972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90399486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789586117","doi":"","title":"Epitome of the laws of Nova-Scotia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Epitome; Law; Nova (rocket); Political science; History; Art; Archaeology; Engineering; Aeronautics; Literature","score_opus":0.021527813676698284,"score_gpt":0.2587053619854907,"score_spread":0.23717754830879242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789586117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46828485,0.00030317006,0.0000012826208,0.004588142,0.0006451329,0.00040277682,0.00016057485,0.000014540214,0.52559954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839008,0.00037870355,0.00014575617,0.000103255115,0.00018787624,0.0000054564125,7.801484e-7,0.00001169185,0.015265695],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837977,0.00014180632,0.00040784816,0.00017696773,0.00047054605,0.00042306338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986339,0.00024157645,0.00035854088,0.00028235375,0.00023557943,0.00024804333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003673698,0.00013600216,0.00034856418,0.00011280368,0.00019912228,0.000007044215,0.00056323496,0.00012548814,0.00039432608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007413922,0.00007946841,0.00016935481,0.00036151454,0.0010562486,0.0001290002,0.000063514606,0.000079655554,0.00002189542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033097567,0.00009827629,0.48652235,0.00017404907,0.00031749817,0.000011587039,0.046994504,0.0000041681587,0.0032354617,0.3548707,0.071196504,0.036541812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029776737,0.000034738274,0.23621738,0.00012804684,0.000041587937,4.3745266e-7,0.0013167793,1.483106e-7,0.00083932205,0.0011749376,0.75976115,0.0001876722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8976272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.979038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68856466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021518205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005878009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43175942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789630241","doi":"","title":"The report of the Nova Scotia House of Assembly Select Committee on Constitutional Matters","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Political science; Archaeology; Law; History; Engineering; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.021562873062293982,"score_gpt":0.2630142764675198,"score_spread":0.2414514034052258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789630241","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38965455,0.0001863305,0.0000052253386,0.04188686,0.0012525757,0.00078016426,0.00015700572,0.000033053508,0.5660442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991836,0.0001573745,0.00006010348,0.00038330484,0.000116530784,0.000006685176,8.4445855e-7,0.000009199705,0.007429926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835885,0.00016814971,0.00041121384,0.0001598361,0.00054987567,0.00035208018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831724,0.0005611859,0.0004307877,0.0002863057,0.00024751615,0.00015695501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059328123,0.00012342031,0.00023331335,0.00006577451,0.0005119773,0.0000137946445,0.000470628,0.000084174644,0.00006226039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000959951,0.00006235134,0.00013392905,0.00024048137,0.002655645,0.00008091248,0.00004054409,0.00009961245,0.000013716423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035373287,0.000053338703,0.18110138,0.00003801457,0.00027182576,0.000035571527,0.0061815707,0.000009929297,0.0007374933,0.5039155,0.30338344,0.0042365743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022875106,0.00003192425,0.12384556,0.000117963056,0.000034568133,0.000005052567,0.00064838136,1.8441004e-7,0.00053731905,0.00044204807,0.8739673,0.00014093993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6166776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.923023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6021815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027387968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010979463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97848344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789665508","doi":"","title":"British Columbia statute citator : R.S.B.C. 1996 edition.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01430607723346247,"score_gpt":0.23703300050151732,"score_spread":0.22272692326805485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789665508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20515679,0.00048269908,0.0000051040656,0.0039817635,0.0013291467,0.00062856637,0.000698991,0.00011322158,0.78760374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71364135,0.0043692137,0.00077040493,0.00076866156,0.0017798491,0.00012492159,0.000025073017,0.000044748995,0.27847576],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997975,0.00012709753,0.00033617995,0.0003096182,0.000505763,0.00074633193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840206,0.00020970024,0.00017726807,0.00017796135,0.0002503944,0.0007826061],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032575236,0.00012824599,0.00028739372,0.00009208042,0.00074013846,0.000153305,0.00033976417,0.00015600471,0.0034912543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079360313,0.00014655036,0.000117953445,0.00030047892,0.00067001185,0.00037404476,0.00003671629,0.00010149233,0.00007257273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003475577,0.000020224255,0.057854716,0.000018494888,0.0000651225,0.00007207742,0.0037731763,1.3238862e-7,0.0000203661,0.008122734,0.88867223,0.041377276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025063564,0.00002290373,0.15606676,0.00006663524,0.00001789413,0.0000014826935,0.0008258689,6.9958894e-8,0.0000023554348,0.0011514961,0.84137726,0.00021662844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9925139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99957436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.509128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005646065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000815762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789688059","doi":"","title":"Upper Canada statutes.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law; Geology","score_opus":0.014543314188543335,"score_gpt":0.23930284731491888,"score_spread":0.22475953312637553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789688059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09116388,0.00037997618,0.0000014267412,0.014555984,0.00069941813,0.00031101596,0.0002191828,0.000035474626,0.8926336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8736145,0.0015347385,0.00024412997,0.0008451434,0.0004421915,0.00002957254,0.000004737369,0.000020814514,0.1232642],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998247,0.00008941557,0.00025379343,0.00022417543,0.00048607183,0.00069953006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986172,0.00020533027,0.00012433475,0.00017800904,0.0001651471,0.0007100205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020973336,0.00015024722,0.00023448077,0.00011129145,0.0004944833,0.000020478434,0.00032578528,0.00009401514,0.00084064645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005777319,0.000106501095,0.0000665352,0.00022258908,0.00033703106,0.00017322636,0.000029549012,0.00007860144,0.000031086856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010692931,0.000016123582,0.10574469,0.0000279559,0.000118029086,0.00008705881,0.010466164,0.0000010300123,0.000048132457,0.17493415,0.6632543,0.04529168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014971942,0.000009358589,0.050699368,0.00002472,0.000011200818,3.5696345e-7,0.0010465533,8.243226e-8,0.00001870532,0.0003432151,0.9475114,0.00018536992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7824506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011842549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036513638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9204489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789701351","doi":"","title":"Law Foundation of British Columbia.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.019037387177350845,"score_gpt":0.26247670750441543,"score_spread":0.24343932032706458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789701351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39079148,0.0003935241,4.014549e-7,0.0013413826,0.0006374958,0.0003150702,0.00019336087,0.000024697914,0.60630256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854319,0.007871643,0.00036879122,0.00008184641,0.00022781534,0.000019253255,0.000012443691,0.0000104661485,0.0059758476],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869955,0.000069251684,0.00028669846,0.00019815793,0.00035583775,0.00039053147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865335,0.00006077715,0.0004070588,0.0002876281,0.00030436678,0.00028679505],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031237057,0.000085386666,0.00026598485,0.00016761392,0.0017792628,0.00026002803,0.00053538947,0.00013862827,0.0002732301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040876275,0.00012670254,0.0001615173,0.00050488167,0.002838942,0.00041376462,0.000046342306,0.000077609526,0.0000080930495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008045856,0.00007335505,0.7161468,0.00009913436,0.00023486381,0.000027302327,0.009221625,5.633989e-7,0.00004315517,0.08307513,0.1523536,0.038716372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001247701,0.000019877349,0.33019385,0.00003335422,0.000021873364,3.3178839e-7,0.0016649853,1.5609065e-7,0.0000027121591,0.00084307784,0.666977,0.000118036565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9986714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6003267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006765536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018982457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789702768","doi":"","title":"Report of the Committee to Study and Review the Judicial System of Saskatchewan.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.019640690873801075,"score_gpt":0.2692741739221532,"score_spread":0.24963348304835212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789702768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7185789,0.004822628,0.00000110068,0.024930017,0.0005950175,0.003480708,0.00010683472,0.000022820686,0.24746199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947057,0.0010733824,0.000031445943,0.00027255362,0.000118661206,0.000043498745,2.76958e-7,0.0000075398993,0.0037469398],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827147,0.0003218975,0.00050941843,0.00016866824,0.00047560374,0.00025294055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985936,0.00023621596,0.00040820552,0.0003505059,0.00022352298,0.00018792221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011617918,0.000113813025,0.00039940613,0.000044948873,0.00039341836,0.000006826032,0.00043140503,0.00005051312,0.000025318079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008490636,0.000053695163,0.0000911784,0.0002997871,0.00048313968,0.000049858612,0.00009194318,0.00006637821,0.0000021853375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036117548,0.00015535131,0.48653948,0.0013161598,0.0006758888,0.00011317447,0.2626521,6.352969e-7,0.0001256024,0.026986646,0.14005056,0.08134829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026052893,0.000081471764,0.24121158,0.0012395785,0.00019605448,0.000005943759,0.0373182,4.79612e-8,0.000035509758,0.00012267276,0.71934956,0.0001788698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82669497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95440894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.579299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017202955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004566023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30258957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789745359","doi":"","title":"The Charter and law reform: the role of the Constitution in the future endeavours of the Law Reform Commission of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Law reform; Political science; Charter; Law; Constitution; Public law","score_opus":0.0073450408116859925,"score_gpt":0.21401998107643552,"score_spread":0.20667494026474953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789745359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.112902455,0.0009348817,4.6834135e-8,0.0415498,0.0003569148,0.00064455956,0.0001248365,0.0000032247497,0.84348327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99710876,0.00049298134,0.0000035478618,0.0003769205,0.00011841485,0.000017770943,5.565455e-7,0.0000043656632,0.0018766945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983954,0.00030715033,0.00033161725,0.00011435277,0.00053355127,0.00031792544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885684,0.00022130777,0.00032900643,0.00036992898,0.00013147802,0.000091458474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000770749,0.000121976576,0.00019658743,0.000017837645,0.0012167474,0.000014292423,0.00076617004,0.000092881186,0.0000122147385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011586718,0.00003758589,0.00008024793,0.00019336976,0.002338088,0.000097589276,0.0000764591,0.00016752878,1.951013e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011172034,0.0000071493146,0.004590967,0.000012133651,0.000025928046,5.308978e-7,0.018400427,4.4589822e-7,0.000094056646,0.97210205,0.0016797539,0.0030753706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016289212,0.000014552546,0.047275268,0.00008250994,0.000021848553,0.0000011255943,0.029786898,5.880442e-7,0.0003510717,0.002204862,0.9200257,0.00007268373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9929685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99974906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9698972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004947027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008971038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9358361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789836056","doi":"","title":"Reports of the Supreme Court of Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01479750750637638,"score_gpt":0.23279857186722291,"score_spread":0.21800106436084654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789836056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3485438,0.00023276979,4.6163785e-7,0.008706915,0.00066026626,0.0003735227,0.000126245,0.0000089023215,0.6413471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692307,0.00020358426,0.000050435756,0.000098227705,0.00010392239,0.000008051568,6.570719e-7,0.000008107757,0.03029629],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834627,0.000097843986,0.00043017013,0.0001542145,0.00058755645,0.00038395496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985795,0.0001631872,0.0004365514,0.00027305374,0.00027643554,0.00027127683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003749603,0.000106755295,0.00027421035,0.00005874686,0.00026743556,0.0000042168294,0.00031704575,0.00007958668,0.00019138523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010865874,0.000063116364,0.00009108615,0.00022255961,0.0005553423,0.00007629007,0.00004081394,0.0000584935,6.7102224e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017372686,0.000040281277,0.46730635,0.000111915906,0.00024301565,0.000073631505,0.0231142,0.000006528083,0.0009427656,0.08215736,0.41780826,0.008178325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090486996,0.000010224327,0.1559178,0.00006808093,0.000021463786,0.0000011746461,0.0009670431,9.925038e-8,0.00040990076,0.00048094272,0.84192485,0.00010795492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99988633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62068695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044125895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034472034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6115191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789902355","doi":"","title":"Revised statutes of Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.016164093329110094,"score_gpt":0.2425944280175748,"score_spread":0.2264303346884647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789902355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101889424,0.00055346405,0.0000015176159,0.007982403,0.00037382994,0.00036612613,0.0002541031,0.000021197075,0.8885579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93271375,0.0016530909,0.00027606488,0.00025554028,0.00022436082,0.000017367727,0.0000029547018,0.000014777223,0.06484209],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842346,0.00009867418,0.00032310036,0.00017386097,0.0004532671,0.00052765297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986377,0.00025512138,0.00021594038,0.00016915193,0.00022894397,0.0004931843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028201542,0.00012505065,0.0002923953,0.000107065396,0.00029933907,0.000008819309,0.00029704277,0.0000776749,0.00043293837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010057649,0.000089095156,0.0000649337,0.00023607163,0.0003746338,0.00012409544,0.000024091001,0.000055971683,0.000005253831],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003135215,0.000032929172,0.08422407,0.00014051565,0.00022277786,0.00006067092,0.020039316,0.0000022579316,0.00039717794,0.29432365,0.552364,0.04816129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017055415,0.00001440917,0.03654623,0.00006458608,0.000014472674,1.7891347e-7,0.00096206024,9.6418056e-8,0.000091296955,0.00036375257,0.96162623,0.00014615568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99865663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8308243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005946655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003453276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61259633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790096435","doi":"","title":"Canada. Parliament. Special Joint Committee on the 1987 Constitutional Accord","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Joint (building); Law; Constitutional court; Constitution; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.03508333222081692,"score_gpt":0.25680805494824244,"score_spread":0.22172472272742552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790096435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0777916,0.00022757975,3.758222e-7,0.07571428,0.0024217463,0.0005368839,0.0005157402,0.000019879044,0.8427719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98995346,0.003201891,0.00006576527,0.0014561891,0.0021955238,0.000042752898,0.000011457567,0.000009005666,0.0030639449],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998033,0.0001259953,0.00029534285,0.00024464232,0.0006974981,0.00060355524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984282,0.00019405944,0.00034235124,0.00042249094,0.00019227041,0.00042061947],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038924263,0.00020414955,0.00027602116,0.00025239092,0.0047218273,0.00016897076,0.00084786053,0.00011359667,0.0006376342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000942095,0.00014760537,0.00016338393,0.00045441967,0.0051839333,0.00016880264,0.000072223644,0.00020961836,0.000020394848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006633797,0.000012946438,0.039286915,0.000004166573,0.00007136866,0.000016203501,0.0011351159,7.6544427e-7,0.000001926798,0.3800661,0.57817656,0.0012213333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012689455,0.000016319518,0.16876267,0.000023926217,0.000019357853,3.7037563e-7,0.0029018945,2.124514e-7,0.000008132563,0.0005740829,0.82739335,0.00017280309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9121619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034505816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021954868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99752337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790143147","doi":"","title":"Abortion and our Canadian laws: laws concerning abortion","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Law; Political science; Pregnancy; Biology","score_opus":0.03333094323165154,"score_gpt":0.29898844774850714,"score_spread":0.2656575045168556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790143147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34888253,0.0005813664,0.0000012165963,0.009577295,0.000825883,0.0005521025,0.00015259512,0.000048525588,0.6393785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827689,0.001735029,0.00020217831,0.0003890532,0.0006653768,0.000035599634,0.00001880065,0.000022755843,0.014162306],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979455,0.00011603603,0.00035206997,0.00036132822,0.00039891148,0.00082617294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977415,0.0000487467,0.0003990379,0.0003268332,0.00025028727,0.001233601],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052952726,0.00022509602,0.00034850277,0.00022304311,0.0033156187,0.00025857598,0.00044585447,0.00024635612,0.000093555405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085484097,0.0002275015,0.00008244562,0.00013144682,0.000467151,0.00057327934,0.00004387697,0.00022237959,0.000033624765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028613493,0.000030213205,0.62036026,0.00011987116,0.0002542809,0.00021833944,0.06918156,0.000020590518,0.00009621643,0.17008482,0.06591849,0.07368675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021475623,0.000020824922,0.292481,0.000051327363,0.000034767796,0.0000012126371,0.0039518923,0.000005346384,0.000009478905,0.00032753882,0.70264405,0.00025780508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99781066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99979466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63672554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007778482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013466718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790261709","doi":"","title":"The patriation and legitimacy of the Canadian Constitution","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Constitution; Political science; Democratic legitimacy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.017221086216382943,"score_gpt":0.2478710325694878,"score_spread":0.23064994635310487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790261709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11623007,0.0005718783,0.0000014266751,0.028575335,0.00064865494,0.0007120435,0.00013101455,0.000012741247,0.8531168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99277747,0.000889506,0.000025165458,0.000121758116,0.00013310835,0.000014006595,8.341477e-7,0.0000036026095,0.0060345633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899364,0.00012668042,0.00019636977,0.00011224246,0.00024914637,0.00032191482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990383,0.00022376575,0.00015522227,0.00013415959,0.00016061374,0.00028793045],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040431856,0.00007943827,0.000116322946,0.0000692354,0.0015600158,0.000032280725,0.00022034602,0.00008040293,0.000030644373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094558933,0.000040154486,0.000050782455,0.0001711595,0.0012199803,0.00012693439,0.000019516643,0.00005942675,0.000004168762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058743058,0.000003663843,0.101285554,0.000010302708,0.000045131554,0.000002367068,0.009282289,8.850322e-7,0.00003981123,0.83718365,0.013022825,0.03911763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013549664,0.0000072719668,0.13094458,0.00002764205,0.000015781681,4.104551e-7,0.0007632622,4.4596493e-7,0.000020194148,0.0013010945,0.86671156,0.00007224455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9953423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8765474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048448934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017588381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790315201","doi":"","title":"Index to Canadian legal literature, 1985-2000","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Political science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.012939407106818915,"score_gpt":0.2500529014348576,"score_spread":0.2371134943280387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790315201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040461544,0.00042486106,0.0000023417822,0.025385827,0.00079547195,0.00063545763,0.0004165207,0.00005725208,0.93182075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8520147,0.000706531,0.000239208,0.0024699678,0.0008480505,0.000059634116,0.000009561808,0.00003145494,0.14362088],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744743,0.0001318469,0.00034456857,0.0003882068,0.0004930413,0.0011949233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966388,0.00012674382,0.000108092914,0.0002866735,0.00031703443,0.0025226853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000357186,0.00025325242,0.00033751986,0.0006285095,0.0007965141,0.000117588635,0.00055983255,0.00025368144,0.00052228884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008131699,0.00019280489,0.0001246998,0.00078071636,0.00031548418,0.00038253874,0.00003794145,0.0001674052,0.00021326068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037731574,0.000031873024,0.057821155,0.000042327887,0.000183269,0.00041043683,0.06756959,0.0000051787156,0.00007628983,0.29840648,0.47282863,0.102587044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018596664,0.000028478136,0.038575258,0.000094099414,0.000012315663,0.0000017222965,0.0005652618,1.9077842e-7,0.000010962736,0.00040442598,0.95980525,0.00031604312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9977794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99986815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8115532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002195254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039231875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7862356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790335405","doi":"","title":"Newfoundland. Office of the Legislative Counsel.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Business; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02350382428055551,"score_gpt":0.27358808298098525,"score_spread":0.2500842587004297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790335405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17078663,0.00086001883,5.1919795e-7,0.0065903203,0.0010224594,0.00042183598,0.0001389555,0.000017892522,0.82016134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98530996,0.007049505,0.00012064964,0.00011428574,0.00026563247,0.000014127634,0.0000026371795,0.000009992771,0.0071132053],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985207,0.00012148003,0.0002659417,0.0001916099,0.00047506156,0.0004252116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998312,0.00013859538,0.000530608,0.00046028683,0.00032228284,0.00023621129],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034708474,0.00015072543,0.00027841982,0.00026625887,0.0022133158,0.00007310514,0.0009921592,0.000135595,0.00008838887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079242646,0.00010634004,0.00023355392,0.00079395616,0.0027726751,0.00027199788,0.000065771725,0.0001278656,0.000006840699],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002483481,0.000041974996,0.77010787,0.00003897601,0.0002491709,0.0000057890416,0.05201299,0.0000019024673,0.000044823715,0.12086359,0.05362677,0.0029813298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001113513,0.00001359531,0.37314352,0.00002398962,0.000026497175,1.4895845e-7,0.0016117785,2.1671546e-7,0.000006185366,0.00025573073,0.6247095,0.00009749877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9621166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81452334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008773389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039880467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790342254","doi":"","title":"The provincial statutes of Upper-Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Business; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.011849446026341125,"score_gpt":0.23552169350867436,"score_spread":0.22367224748233322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790342254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19714728,0.00071070896,0.0000012689818,0.017235622,0.0007465174,0.00059644296,0.00031363106,0.000023570805,0.78322494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.947903,0.0016666161,0.00011322242,0.00017061371,0.00037985423,0.00003049246,0.0000019107142,0.0000141864,0.049720112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835134,0.00011490511,0.00031180738,0.00016021344,0.00051725016,0.00054447236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857175,0.00047392448,0.00021397388,0.00017724695,0.00022215865,0.00034091898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034344403,0.00012285686,0.00021345084,0.000062466315,0.00073456875,0.000018761957,0.0004218833,0.00007509633,0.000112581205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011228651,0.000069548754,0.00007024091,0.00018809712,0.0007006822,0.00011820847,0.00003657529,0.00006974809,0.00000579906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039467388,0.000024886152,0.10461809,0.00004365031,0.00017256742,0.000021418231,0.015128004,8.4254964e-7,0.00014357665,0.48166445,0.26401752,0.13412552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012565829,0.000017366685,0.050251186,0.000023893357,0.000012346534,1.7384536e-7,0.001642278,1.20214e-7,0.0000637025,0.0005805324,0.9471658,0.000116931384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99810064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7507557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005400586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039432445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69951457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790345792","doi":"","title":"Submission to the Special Joint Committee of the Senate and of the House of Commons on the Constitution of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Constitution; House of Representatives; Political science; Joint (building); Law; Engineering; Parliament; Legislature; Politics","score_opus":0.02142208873928013,"score_gpt":0.2222007225151136,"score_spread":0.2007786337758335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790345792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.803457,0.000083163504,3.654371e-7,0.0370799,0.00040608997,0.0007051268,0.00027808495,0.0000032210316,0.157987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978541,0.00011597257,0.0000069341686,0.00022460918,0.00012651882,0.000006879361,1.7112173e-7,0.0000051775037,0.0016596089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985164,0.00030274087,0.00034350285,0.00010403449,0.0005048355,0.00022848949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862593,0.0003798013,0.00037902605,0.00031038877,0.00017755739,0.00012730443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000502946,0.000105231156,0.00024823533,0.000035139517,0.00053751725,0.000005307027,0.00047285904,0.00005765969,0.000036985508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009105001,0.00004019534,0.00008610246,0.00021926312,0.0015020327,0.000033777695,0.00009466585,0.000100854355,3.7321436e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008377365,0.00007075882,0.08920715,0.00010921767,0.0002195349,0.0000030202427,0.05819087,0.00004179687,0.0035305647,0.5697403,0.2704969,0.008306131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029145132,0.00004617762,0.32372993,0.00034394008,0.00005563416,6.26077e-7,0.005618355,9.4000484e-7,0.0063687926,0.00065702404,0.662753,0.00013413795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9790037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5690833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020920976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012447397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5534302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790711833","doi":"","title":"The consolidated statutes for Lower Canada : proclaimed and published under the authority of the act 23 Vict. cap. 56, A.D. 1860.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01477875066319915,"score_gpt":0.24746884878782688,"score_spread":0.23269009812462774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790711833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56204367,0.0016209553,0.0000050338267,0.18661803,0.0025549317,0.004435617,0.0012361561,0.00005570411,0.24142988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734596,0.0004628061,0.000036744434,0.000476388,0.00018375067,0.00009884348,0.000003818749,0.0000151585045,0.025262875],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980752,0.00023305076,0.0003468216,0.00023463764,0.0004813038,0.00062901684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740076,0.0012678301,0.00029689624,0.00031298614,0.00041271467,0.00030878707],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071447913,0.00017747807,0.00025696575,0.00003567229,0.0017899285,0.0000912628,0.00065153,0.00011105179,0.000051456755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016037242,0.00007486954,0.00010184017,0.0002620122,0.0013601923,0.00019088709,0.00007571597,0.00013963583,7.786991e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010606606,0.00003633513,0.02836468,0.000078071345,0.0006027113,0.000005682358,0.023331156,0.0000025786478,0.00016371219,0.22329658,0.71145487,0.012557554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028652948,0.000019625466,0.044239298,0.000029446766,0.000050548355,4.054626e-7,0.004800993,0.0000012228979,0.00006951401,0.0017405492,0.9486117,0.00015017968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.984202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41141593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048238982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00411711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790851994","doi":"","title":"A history of Canadian legal thought : collected essays","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.021781795884101493,"score_gpt":0.23519570579334637,"score_spread":0.21341390990924486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790851994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028201796,0.0008983226,8.522674e-7,0.005238242,0.00085399626,0.00044019322,0.00021145953,0.000037786966,0.96411735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55569446,0.001649451,0.00034439348,0.00035427258,0.00037022957,0.00004659417,0.0000066147204,0.00002977648,0.44150418],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778146,0.00019201307,0.00042619996,0.0002911331,0.00046268108,0.0008464925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977775,0.00020685804,0.0002520134,0.00025231973,0.00034624492,0.00116506],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037568386,0.00020774212,0.00042037253,0.00092020736,0.00039435134,0.000014771404,0.00046952927,0.00021816792,0.0009753565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009168149,0.00016521636,0.00014139614,0.00077405956,0.0008292784,0.00024357103,0.000027374716,0.00012302338,0.000035113077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020071828,0.000024927704,0.012063068,0.0000372883,0.00012966312,0.000078756144,0.02147188,6.03346e-7,0.00020766661,0.29492834,0.66331065,0.007727077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002837129,0.000031148582,0.019622073,0.000054844408,0.000030900686,9.714973e-7,0.0008924524,3.3790016e-7,0.000022250766,0.00019165491,0.97862536,0.0002443147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9984205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5274927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040284195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007872908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790877104","doi":"","title":"Ontario. Legislative Assembly. Select Committee on Constitutional Reform","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Law; General assembly; Public administration; Legislative assembly; Politics","score_opus":0.031193738358511316,"score_gpt":0.28358908336297406,"score_spread":0.25239534500446276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790877104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09598176,0.00017245385,0.000001047104,0.006899897,0.00077446835,0.0003694336,0.0001251749,0.000033321692,0.89564246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838729,0.001737212,0.00031359203,0.00025055496,0.00035805782,0.000035768015,0.000018299545,0.000008791309,0.01340485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981553,0.00009219403,0.0002799248,0.00029678352,0.00053820503,0.0006375847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841356,0.00011395128,0.00035829915,0.00036299395,0.00029267656,0.0004585326],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038181458,0.00022538337,0.00033325556,0.00056998676,0.0038937419,0.00014571428,0.00068637956,0.00020122848,0.0003075823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004576841,0.00019423876,0.00021453203,0.0005597985,0.004765382,0.00043159793,0.000054108932,0.00026362477,0.00004929465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029405224,0.000053743774,0.25747034,0.000011478913,0.0002446654,0.000031504078,0.020111578,0.000001277337,0.000008902585,0.65945494,0.059916217,0.002665979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019719743,0.000055191213,0.249102,0.000032012653,0.000023615019,5.4016306e-7,0.0016169403,2.235403e-7,0.0000102870945,0.0005437988,0.7482109,0.00020730581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99184394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8878911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085642247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011451154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790881574","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Constitution 1981, highlights: highlights of the resolution adopted by the Parliament of Canada, December, 1981","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Constitution; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.013126271347663341,"score_gpt":0.22348123370049017,"score_spread":0.21035496235282683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790881574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0735167,0.0027159431,0.0000030325523,0.12563525,0.0020385229,0.0017980133,0.000984528,0.000024874233,0.79328316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980357,0.001527577,0.00002345581,0.0002953227,0.00014328187,0.00004705157,0.0000058452993,0.000010262429,0.017590223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971708,0.00037105626,0.0005667424,0.0002420855,0.0008677352,0.0007815998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765944,0.0004684424,0.0004978301,0.0004341298,0.00041249164,0.0005276892],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006725826,0.000211882,0.0003001607,0.00008277103,0.0026790185,0.00003236056,0.00082761404,0.00016302594,0.000060636085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006947201,0.000096713266,0.00012193419,0.00041525724,0.0021155921,0.00012252746,0.00004848405,0.00013707252,0.0000032720181],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018737268,0.00001404284,0.0042972183,0.000016244636,0.00014242559,0.000004473887,0.0041709165,0.00000880362,0.00010986948,0.5898325,0.39932787,0.0020569067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022453608,0.000018357134,0.018365834,0.00008428682,0.0000484233,7.9602734e-7,0.0010760593,0.0000014590732,0.00034239123,0.00035476283,0.9793239,0.00015916594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99987906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90684026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002518096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010290657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791057598","doi":"","title":"[The Canadian constitution: documents]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01891804603770693,"score_gpt":0.26577024079102657,"score_spread":0.24685219475331965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791057598","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006239947,0.00048679303,9.935534e-7,0.02627394,0.0008510163,0.00039348466,0.00007820105,0.000030272462,0.9656454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89301693,0.0019124285,0.000092881695,0.0005114269,0.00044845132,0.000047511247,0.0000029754826,0.00000964342,0.10395775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981727,0.0001230703,0.00026967103,0.00020793172,0.00040148446,0.0008251445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981339,0.00023256535,0.00012359837,0.00021281678,0.00020924494,0.0010878547],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004911216,0.00014388008,0.00017794687,0.00015775126,0.003013216,0.000089481655,0.00044019576,0.00013691168,0.00040932783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079766137,0.000088522254,0.000084091436,0.00026703332,0.0014827568,0.00022308031,0.000023634746,0.00009677125,0.00017728299],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038623057,0.0000037101288,0.021237496,0.0000041451135,0.000055954384,0.000027900871,0.0031983226,3.3123632e-7,0.0000051778325,0.8420102,0.11028429,0.023168635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015668088,0.000010680113,0.013532255,0.000025317097,0.000013743119,0.0000010016878,0.00068397704,7.567561e-8,0.0000060423463,0.0014334251,0.9839787,0.00015812331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99829364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.886777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015905064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034144768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791250404","doi":"","title":"Women's legal strategies in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.014359753263392805,"score_gpt":0.23439096413012483,"score_spread":0.22003121086673202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791250404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4821952,0.00010171871,3.5186403e-7,0.0032426787,0.00027381929,0.00017519666,0.000047487618,0.000013147354,0.5139504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98115635,0.0005302003,0.000048677433,0.0002328013,0.00016516699,0.000042993248,0.0000011462413,0.000010597557,0.017812086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818397,0.00010652981,0.00028551678,0.00021178465,0.0003996275,0.0008125705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989726,0.00016719209,0.00011056403,0.00013735093,0.000085189684,0.00052710436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002496916,0.00014633471,0.00026491415,0.00015625912,0.0002522683,0.000033943244,0.00031516165,0.00007592737,0.00047259827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029162387,0.000109144574,0.00003814254,0.00028975736,0.00025650437,0.00034867664,0.000024769914,0.000094784766,0.000013694533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036414705,0.000033835215,0.22241046,0.000063415224,0.00012030869,0.00043861847,0.051309697,0.00001657034,0.00010338785,0.6022253,0.062236354,0.061005637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020450013,0.000012797838,0.09823126,0.000029565312,0.0000033555987,3.9301753e-7,0.017459009,1.8215042e-7,0.0000060064694,0.00075096585,0.8831129,0.0001890603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82087654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003924959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009411513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791259605","doi":"","title":"Canadian constitutional charter. Charte constitutionnelle canadienne","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Charter; Law","score_opus":0.01856120590253359,"score_gpt":0.23718095217910687,"score_spread":0.21861974627657327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791259605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046887305,0.00032850093,0.000013146215,0.022633296,0.0013078431,0.00059155765,0.0009694272,0.000060599377,0.9272083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.963529,0.00063693535,0.00012946139,0.0006945106,0.000520655,0.00005052199,0.000019922974,0.000012006228,0.034407023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752766,0.000112664304,0.00037694364,0.0003588675,0.00033593105,0.0012879441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968306,0.00015255623,0.00015567102,0.00022998762,0.00031518118,0.002316045],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004334736,0.00023394344,0.00033014044,0.00047112658,0.0015824783,0.000040065388,0.00040336014,0.00020299385,0.0022034277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065949664,0.00018838356,0.00011778187,0.00037167847,0.0025860379,0.00031859148,0.000023564397,0.00012497742,0.0002575532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041374465,0.0000084394405,0.019572264,0.000008619907,0.00006193058,0.000072549214,0.004367545,0.0000011305875,0.000031735348,0.9372518,0.03407845,0.004541387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003305622,0.000018562325,0.015337618,0.00006569753,0.000023521525,0.0000059829226,0.0011994172,6.18728e-7,0.000012244465,0.0010230416,0.9816702,0.00031254732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99847984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99994326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9475917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00274475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007171442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791308796","doi":"","title":"Canadian constitutional decisions of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, 1930 to 1939","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.038739408860526924,"score_gpt":0.25843523548732006,"score_spread":0.21969582662679313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791308796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1605928,0.00021377596,0.000005042854,0.030672476,0.0013654557,0.0009986723,0.0011611974,0.000011482137,0.8049791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98910046,0.00014204078,0.000120201476,0.0007357978,0.0002088248,0.00002040193,9.956761e-7,0.000007537785,0.00966372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778795,0.0001666703,0.00040946333,0.0001878254,0.0009449886,0.00050307356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977664,0.00044216646,0.00023429893,0.0003495073,0.0006258485,0.0005818215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005883463,0.00014459186,0.0002869173,0.00010818289,0.0009876817,0.000012852717,0.00089028175,0.00012887943,0.00024180897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036231817,0.00007852158,0.0001678107,0.0004917731,0.0022275986,0.000085771026,0.00009295685,0.00011833741,0.00001598891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013745042,0.000025758953,0.12402092,0.000010740251,0.00010551552,0.000004918182,0.015137138,0.000013100731,0.00015460954,0.6331612,0.22122549,0.0061268555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016732219,0.000013037824,0.118695416,0.00011317527,0.000027789078,6.5066087e-7,0.00067269424,1.8338041e-7,0.000047610873,0.0013888167,0.878756,0.00011733962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9902896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82850766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018257383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011467255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791377649","doi":"","title":"Cases decided on the British North America Act, 1867: in the Privy Council, the Supreme Court of Canada, and the provincial courts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science","score_opus":0.02204061331326527,"score_gpt":0.22164496649740528,"score_spread":0.19960435318414002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791377649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81754845,0.00040619963,2.6332583e-7,0.04251927,0.00018110231,0.0012741246,0.0002757115,0.000008124229,0.13778675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99311435,0.0009883048,0.000006066449,0.0019096232,0.00022395619,0.00009511397,0.0000016147443,0.000010545524,0.0036504471],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997308,0.0005234404,0.00033714037,0.00020741651,0.001098877,0.0005251383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963121,0.0027025065,0.0002607964,0.00029140906,0.00027066653,0.00016254507],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012157521,0.00016477905,0.00029164815,0.000024735866,0.0016052558,0.000105248946,0.000738913,0.000058578637,0.00005045337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034149366,0.000068174486,0.00007144907,0.00022731088,0.0020674034,0.00008988372,0.000050756622,0.00018513689,0.0000015859524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021382995,0.00007501357,0.12093806,0.000038907576,0.00024330433,0.00031734654,0.116415545,0.000011730784,0.000007906131,0.05125135,0.6711283,0.03935873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037619658,0.00003293804,0.20863941,0.0000485381,0.000031914777,0.0000069252046,0.005406849,0.0000013758109,0.000002078254,0.0003030459,0.78501475,0.00013598992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9991862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17556587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073394866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045747897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791587689","doi":"","title":"Law and custom in the Canadian constitution","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.021477033031984918,"score_gpt":0.2572768788994729,"score_spread":0.235799845867488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791587689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04498143,0.00024558482,2.7760055e-7,0.014208029,0.0001695989,0.00034222341,0.00005501608,0.000010667575,0.9399872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951499,0.00047279152,0.000044328815,0.0013146562,0.00013419394,0.000023196468,0.0000017576099,0.000004066041,0.0028550995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988291,0.0001430835,0.00017039425,0.00015876052,0.00023190705,0.00046675012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991742,0.0001641528,0.00006002043,0.000115511095,0.00006731835,0.0004188162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049056427,0.000100015546,0.00014422854,0.00015268133,0.000838426,0.000044352193,0.00022106289,0.000113935464,0.000078564866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030574444,0.0000611901,0.000031555148,0.0002022189,0.0011486518,0.00017674222,0.0000116961955,0.000090168265,0.00002036624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014703298,0.0000028958268,0.020729486,0.000003935576,0.000007619865,0.000023162796,0.010022959,1.906342e-7,0.000003522902,0.9605304,0.005243321,0.0034310124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014918132,0.000008811885,0.04633647,0.000027306658,0.000008192402,0.0000014189608,0.0017260375,1.467596e-7,0.0000021746728,0.0014739145,0.95015657,0.000109797635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9992965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9590565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006024355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010746357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64485794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791661567","doi":"10.11575/prism/29247","title":"Anglican Church of Canada. Diocese of Calgary","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Geography","score_opus":0.010371151974294585,"score_gpt":0.21289130488000316,"score_spread":0.20252015290570857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791661567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8537739,0.00037250074,0.0006985176,0.0013504087,0.00007797499,0.00019655062,0.0000025872248,0.000021498268,0.14350605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862082,0.0000794862,0.0034360262,0.000016519987,0.000021124033,2.2400322e-7,0.0000049333407,0.0000046885157,0.010228827],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987919,0.00009855634,0.00015292875,0.00015282922,0.0005530203,0.00025078745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925834,0.00009882969,0.00021650514,0.00012451805,0.00021121226,0.00009057573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002039461,0.00009090563,0.00029942635,0.000044493478,0.00035413707,0.0000030668434,0.00034285546,0.000089622496,0.00019539602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007220897,0.00009722326,0.0000994015,0.0002607363,0.00072631484,0.00012334528,0.00011443241,0.000098997945,0.0000012322242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000516741,0.0012889022,0.296617,0.0007768281,0.0009211842,0.00023483165,0.15836728,0.000018844896,0.014615362,0.15534191,0.1802575,0.19104363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010228289,0.00008353932,0.8716251,0.000062761035,0.00011598999,4.6518076e-7,0.008203228,0.0006199138,0.0012748858,0.0007303342,0.115893856,0.00036710317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96933776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59852475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5750081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020971804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037186392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40880114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791768432","doi":"","title":"Handy guide to the laws of Ontario","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01981013156628711,"score_gpt":0.2655528205346891,"score_spread":0.24574268896840198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791768432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11608183,0.00015422201,0.0000055524943,0.014331621,0.0004348485,0.0005231823,0.00007057754,0.000020007015,0.86837816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6037973,0.0003314198,0.0006702514,0.0008019936,0.00044621734,0.000054111846,0.0000020034454,0.000017378523,0.39387926],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984596,0.00009613163,0.00033627969,0.00019959542,0.00041742277,0.00049099774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998766,0.00018688831,0.00015431162,0.00025636973,0.00020151761,0.00043488116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047039244,0.00013534882,0.0002624326,0.00010585465,0.0004510124,0.000019436862,0.00050647155,0.00009199036,0.0005426383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006152551,0.000077436656,0.000106867934,0.00022447339,0.00036932924,0.00011544538,0.00005530946,0.00007761825,0.00007274665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000324395,0.0000378737,0.08268197,0.00002466162,0.00018344034,0.000027059035,0.16270065,0.000005516378,0.00020158326,0.15158544,0.5468056,0.055713713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014707258,0.00003029644,0.048357405,0.000039415427,0.000018749477,3.606882e-7,0.0009999211,3.9050366e-8,0.000047468227,0.0002776296,0.9499544,0.00012724532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9950949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99985075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4877155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097109895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016055162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59415084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791788663","doi":"","title":"Saskatchewan. Ministry of Justice and Attorney General","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Christian ministry; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.015902189840457964,"score_gpt":0.2545446179437635,"score_spread":0.23864242810330552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791788663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8633891,0.0016227026,0.0000020721307,0.0054136952,0.00051810447,0.00023852392,0.00026030367,0.000028503266,0.128527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97792,0.013689308,0.0009499424,0.00012367459,0.00037229338,0.000014017024,0.000003271476,0.000012277407,0.0069152005],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998651,0.00009179044,0.00029316745,0.00022608644,0.00029544617,0.00044249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884516,0.00018610078,0.00019352417,0.00015582389,0.00018084927,0.00043855727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023576966,0.00015250954,0.00027868216,0.0004101279,0.00035658502,0.00001609503,0.00023959808,0.00015954718,0.00011731708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031782873,0.000110149456,0.00011639686,0.00095011696,0.0018657552,0.00015320526,0.000037924554,0.000055316614,0.0000043116174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006515289,0.00009910572,0.62228644,0.00039988104,0.00046735615,0.000039534814,0.07603418,5.457621e-7,0.0028708426,0.096994154,0.16043963,0.04030316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026580013,0.00004878022,0.13816173,0.000051843563,0.0001154241,7.9310746e-7,0.014640676,1.2393828e-7,0.00012821403,0.00029424787,0.8460686,0.00022373098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6923352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9305954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.685629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059531867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034744153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6874453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791871202","doi":"","title":"The Privy Council and its scholars: Canadian constitutional law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.03825414940355826,"score_gpt":0.252827281990747,"score_spread":0.21457313258718874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791871202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03327137,0.0022404622,4.6345346e-7,0.01852196,0.0004566841,0.0004375538,0.00024538473,0.000025950825,0.9448002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96851254,0.003269956,0.000050283088,0.00084604335,0.0002968902,0.000034927616,0.0000021091503,0.000008839829,0.026978405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818075,0.00011258174,0.00022865999,0.00022042543,0.00057902985,0.00067853864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795914,0.00030439504,0.00009803354,0.00013847552,0.00048542625,0.0010145067],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008050896,0.00014406921,0.00017339199,0.00006921351,0.0024615128,0.000094757605,0.00031613102,0.00013216844,0.0001476552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015286339,0.000089650486,0.000051830495,0.00015910658,0.0021736866,0.00031794078,0.00002916047,0.00012251611,0.000049682392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026824537,0.0000021235107,0.0027768838,0.000003718391,0.000029879102,0.000014405674,0.0017836627,1.371419e-7,0.000012142722,0.9827961,0.009956509,0.0026217743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018431076,0.000010478922,0.008440084,0.000033793018,0.000013810624,0.0000024824162,0.00054846186,2.8060828e-7,0.00000735796,0.0016814374,0.9889198,0.00015771788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9875605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9811146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018145952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006024104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791951286","doi":"","title":"Constitutional law of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01665031955606958,"score_gpt":0.2386969532323604,"score_spread":0.22204663367629082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791951286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02476435,0.00017852339,0.0000023853634,0.004734672,0.0003910584,0.00018437947,0.00025313615,0.0000118084545,0.9694797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98177654,0.00021639663,0.00014679943,0.0002998065,0.00016710853,0.000009966258,0.0000023365167,0.0000039977667,0.017377038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987235,0.00006261104,0.00025055427,0.00014011866,0.00042245345,0.00040076533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989491,0.00019270966,0.00014075686,0.000111071546,0.00019903465,0.00040730266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019269035,0.000098671866,0.00020936326,0.000045390232,0.00040223153,0.0000064405417,0.00022331053,0.0000722108,0.00044613433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040220883,0.00007202528,0.00005447311,0.0001405894,0.0016609197,0.000112768845,0.00001979248,0.000048244423,0.0000059682584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027970943,0.000004276698,0.006147774,0.0000075045855,0.000026567759,0.000008861347,0.0009482982,7.1035015e-7,0.000024618425,0.967437,0.023929588,0.001461948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015371936,0.000008737502,0.009229148,0.00003438865,0.000010123631,5.183205e-7,0.0004922301,6.6807395e-8,0.00006694902,0.00092462363,0.98896205,0.00011744218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9993493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96651244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061097834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034243937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6119728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791980093","doi":"","title":"The patriation and amendment of the Constitution of Canada: brief","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Amendment; Law; Political science; First amendment; Supreme court","score_opus":0.012058208940915109,"score_gpt":0.2220442219999909,"score_spread":0.2099860130590758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791980093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53494173,0.0008635223,0.0000032795117,0.01851715,0.0006719981,0.00072422065,0.00018523412,0.0000070069636,0.44408584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99505186,0.0010160476,0.000016523012,0.00005555857,0.000056618737,0.00000756697,3.930698e-7,0.0000020881898,0.0037933197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990923,0.00009796277,0.00022212203,0.00008244704,0.0003046019,0.00020060473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918497,0.00022425293,0.00023692258,0.00010538332,0.00013460868,0.0001138407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003079137,0.000061004346,0.00012350787,0.000023860053,0.0004946217,0.0000063940847,0.00015422744,0.00004036779,0.000015935195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005722117,0.000030349087,0.00003416801,0.0001076458,0.0007387987,0.000055122488,0.000023090472,0.000033548844,1.830912e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018994402,0.00001144295,0.08704181,0.00003512024,0.00010426527,0.0000017759932,0.01206002,0.0000035227336,0.00040891222,0.8383185,0.027626779,0.034368813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020048536,0.000013534982,0.13504046,0.00004457908,0.000021864824,2.1246275e-7,0.001738495,3.742723e-7,0.00028026834,0.0006690052,0.86192083,0.000069906055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9952891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8376495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000362492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017018836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38042802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791997457","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Constitution 1980: highlights of a proposed resolution respecting the Constitution of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Resolution (logic); Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01809629576969711,"score_gpt":0.23955524935479044,"score_spread":0.22145895358509332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791997457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06631576,0.0006717663,0.0000052549403,0.026486829,0.0010072637,0.001133481,0.00022812877,0.000019756097,0.90413177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950617,0.0004156268,0.000056713758,0.00007100236,0.00015847865,0.00001631363,0.0000027263022,0.0000049451696,0.004212485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785703,0.00027465622,0.00048142797,0.00019097245,0.000593343,0.0006025782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979365,0.00048043372,0.00043215434,0.0002443844,0.0005140973,0.00039244257],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096448354,0.00014282795,0.0002418525,0.00013703026,0.0026364054,0.000025273366,0.0003957644,0.0001219935,0.000027866565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019706879,0.0000769165,0.00007357444,0.0003812921,0.0025288626,0.00013860223,0.000023619357,0.0001159462,0.0000020270897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016033131,0.000004282772,0.003687267,0.000015438505,0.00005074311,0.0000074917,0.003533592,0.0000067849,0.0001284619,0.9825938,0.008189413,0.0017667022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023628237,0.00002524848,0.018246092,0.0001428169,0.000035002708,0.0000017735111,0.002354684,0.00000251641,0.00037902073,0.0008630654,0.9775628,0.00015068456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9817307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022976561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016099831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99866205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792031039","doi":"","title":"Epitome of the laws of Nova-Scotia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Epitome; Law; Nova (rocket); Political science; History; Art; Archaeology; Engineering; Literature; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.030450444945208564,"score_gpt":0.28528420085373685,"score_spread":0.2548337559085283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792031039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40259632,0.00020702068,2.4784603e-7,0.0025451523,0.0006642141,0.00031976047,0.00009294746,0.0000079084575,0.5935664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874463,0.00028240494,0.00016172483,0.000080905724,0.0002208041,0.0000047159806,0.0000013032316,0.000011065096,0.011790777],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984722,0.00010234341,0.0003739895,0.0001762244,0.00046909996,0.00040612856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982337,0.00011512894,0.0006378223,0.0005301131,0.00023862021,0.0002446549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040943053,0.00013783383,0.00037924014,0.000087123735,0.00071331626,0.000028117378,0.0010598904,0.0001331057,0.00020821262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001113802,0.000101779246,0.00017959408,0.00015116628,0.0014752647,0.0001781204,0.000111862595,0.00013138223,0.000013438812],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021365928,0.00007663971,0.6606845,0.00018658426,0.00026172714,0.000013931017,0.049105763,0.000009168596,0.00050268293,0.23357207,0.0418304,0.013735165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019590861,0.000021919415,0.5107476,0.000069124224,0.000040871215,3.1579367e-7,0.0013445498,5.9577434e-7,0.00029018265,0.0007880921,0.4863512,0.00014965009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9669789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.990919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58484995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015157717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005899782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54863244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792087757","doi":"","title":"Strengthening the Canadian Federation: the Constitution Amendment, 1987","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Amendment; Political science; Law; Constitutional amendment","score_opus":0.0287846970382129,"score_gpt":0.26462097990311934,"score_spread":0.23583628286490643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792087757","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021178842,0.00028996044,0.000005567298,0.05521477,0.00059721724,0.0005800433,0.00008637654,0.00002907766,0.9220182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805607,0.00050333544,0.000054503882,0.0008286279,0.0004853952,0.000052032396,0.00000428697,0.000007137478,0.01750397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839574,0.00019944823,0.00026372165,0.00018634967,0.0003795441,0.0005751734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873835,0.00029166022,0.00015348496,0.0002048942,0.00015649378,0.00045511546],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005877619,0.00014050587,0.00014802944,0.000100948906,0.004154213,0.00013569793,0.0003933023,0.0001019413,0.0003371097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059825426,0.000070403046,0.00007539241,0.00022802714,0.001113858,0.00019551963,0.000022081647,0.00012805068,0.000052923355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003944774,0.000005507464,0.011546131,0.000004599234,0.00007406061,0.000011068835,0.02064998,0.00000582097,0.00002495917,0.88729817,0.059616458,0.02075928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012604141,0.000010545386,0.0069510434,0.000026174755,0.000021404136,0.0000011271836,0.0031358057,9.87897e-7,0.000017162833,0.00070056255,0.98887706,0.00013208455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010536519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021556953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99714226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792105996","doi":"","title":"In the Supreme Court of Canada (On appeal from the Court of Appeal for British Columbia), Between Robin Susan Eldridge, John Henry [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; High Court; Political science","score_opus":0.01754934945317628,"score_gpt":0.2408787006667318,"score_spread":0.22332935121355552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792105996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84313756,0.00036318297,0.0000038686717,0.02440756,0.00050050236,0.0017878502,0.0043308446,0.000013692142,0.12545492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99279064,0.0003940054,0.000057567224,0.00049020135,0.0005245398,0.000067807814,0.000024424233,0.000018702045,0.005632134],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974489,0.00028975276,0.000574468,0.00028115022,0.00072917296,0.000676514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974235,0.0014614193,0.0003473005,0.00028748572,0.00021748016,0.00026277723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008826322,0.00015938174,0.00049000024,0.000046759786,0.0005275753,0.000049903545,0.00085635216,0.00014829004,0.00013578028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005943257,0.00012754998,0.00013417608,0.00023832459,0.00066597166,0.0001223012,0.00004176888,0.0001599804,0.000001261694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000210104,0.000033407992,0.2263279,0.00003539092,0.00013061623,0.000016467686,0.007837073,0.0000035199891,0.000027134018,0.003934022,0.7566626,0.004970884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050939526,0.000060289203,0.3556443,0.00013320427,0.000042094798,4.1143647e-7,0.0033292836,5.9446336e-7,0.000018023622,0.00075658143,0.639326,0.0001798795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14965303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005337622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019867625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52013373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792166187","doi":"10.3138/tjt.2017-0221","title":"“A Serious Playfulness”: The Theological Legacy of Joseph C. McLelland","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Criticism; Philosophy; Religious studies; Sociology; Classics; History; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.025964769047518297,"score_gpt":0.32102866701859106,"score_spread":0.29506389797107274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792166187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87032795,0.0034703799,0.00013217478,0.0052304408,0.0012723211,0.00016756241,0.0000018842373,0.00001607291,0.11938119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99638027,0.00040190484,0.00022898611,0.0002530536,0.0012181669,0.0000021475107,1.3165872e-7,0.0000054469365,0.0015098742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980458,0.0007916213,0.00040710755,0.0001053796,0.00033034815,0.00031971856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982096,0.00061419583,0.00048601467,0.00013501136,0.00046769885,0.00008751013],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016039351,0.00011643376,0.00037117003,0.0000144224905,0.00059247355,0.000028387703,0.00067315425,0.00015397236,0.002770253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008840241,0.000058323865,0.00016392268,0.00006167951,0.002615382,0.00028261097,0.000120276134,0.00019837038,0.000017931767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012706134,0.0003278131,0.024234261,0.000018923478,0.000831328,0.000060571365,0.22876851,0.000022527112,0.0020391562,0.69062424,0.025618035,0.026183993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033426306,0.0040254476,0.20006053,0.0000977935,0.00042154937,0.00028964304,0.16321851,0.0000322515,0.0024011882,0.07613457,0.549245,0.0007308584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055221748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01981773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6144897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001480948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008121597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99814135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792196365","doi":"","title":"The provincial statutes of Lower-Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.011708496137543663,"score_gpt":0.23378756396726896,"score_spread":0.2220790678297253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792196365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19054481,0.0005971074,0.0000013451915,0.0134718865,0.0010010805,0.0005823717,0.00029731105,0.000023242324,0.7934808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9550025,0.0013166346,0.00007785508,0.00014688313,0.00035976444,0.000024369849,0.0000013721477,0.000012537665,0.043058075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983653,0.000105985215,0.0003107451,0.00016002389,0.0005210482,0.0005369085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855566,0.00047118793,0.00022232012,0.00018108852,0.00022795,0.0003417752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034073496,0.00012291093,0.00021168089,0.000057499565,0.00069295167,0.000018534643,0.00042233383,0.000074597876,0.00011135202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011063006,0.00007003347,0.00006952914,0.00019028662,0.00070663466,0.00011738351,0.00003617632,0.000069356836,0.000005908057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007778543,0.000037536607,0.039132502,0.00005153016,0.00021005566,0.000054998905,0.012027857,0.0000013094809,0.00019696004,0.4452006,0.34992048,0.15308838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012847889,0.000027895183,0.02312596,0.000024962153,0.000012652724,1.9920589e-7,0.0010881554,1.15143635e-7,0.000048129124,0.00055151567,0.97487134,0.000120601115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9979352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7644577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005410969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039451984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6998612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792211049","doi":"","title":"Statutes of Manitoba = Lois du Manitoba.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Gerontology; Political science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.019603628502542228,"score_gpt":0.2398045326922512,"score_spread":0.22020090418970895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792211049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49077064,0.00029907547,0.0000031810007,0.0030552363,0.00045877905,0.00036585302,0.00017787746,0.000039311137,0.50483006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863041,0.002570947,0.00038527683,0.00017336439,0.0005135426,0.00002655126,0.0000041240705,0.000020811503,0.0100012515],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822104,0.00011572482,0.00037883507,0.00023998051,0.00046056867,0.00058388023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854517,0.0002722264,0.0002511704,0.00020915088,0.00026961145,0.00045267394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003179109,0.00017668783,0.00033551536,0.00019531876,0.00037549777,0.000021151085,0.00041674267,0.000134054,0.0002898822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006321594,0.00012919006,0.0001232185,0.00025342783,0.0006175498,0.00024579908,0.000050911283,0.000077177436,0.0000638866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042670657,0.000091623566,0.4837394,0.00012553085,0.00030644352,0.00009584915,0.04283629,0.0000017095895,0.0004528809,0.26480302,0.12513265,0.082371935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002507611,0.000036783313,0.11595107,0.000062409126,0.000029187695,6.9654226e-7,0.0061303265,1.4420837e-7,0.00011841277,0.0010735252,0.8761364,0.00021024075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95309967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7510038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081928115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053376565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5268218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792284299","doi":"","title":"Index to the Statutes of Alberta: supplement to the second edition.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Statute; Law; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.014558441405814438,"score_gpt":0.2553271261904215,"score_spread":0.24076868478460708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792284299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12146945,0.00022879058,0.000025716781,0.25412658,0.0014291223,0.002133009,0.0011425891,0.000022166636,0.6194226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91394085,0.00017144387,0.00014459141,0.0022185666,0.0008601807,0.000152574,0.0000051410484,0.000013407293,0.08249324],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984443,0.00012363328,0.000295643,0.00019378292,0.00044614653,0.00049645134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985552,0.00046890794,0.00012620796,0.00025476876,0.000185723,0.00040917954],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045337965,0.00013154598,0.0001975275,0.00009897146,0.0005793125,0.000027871363,0.0005451468,0.000060101665,0.0018397042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060810056,0.00006496465,0.000078089,0.0002939185,0.00026732366,0.00011601514,0.00007493949,0.00007210819,0.00007839454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009809274,0.00001124388,0.008127862,0.000010503392,0.00007907299,0.0000017586435,0.04930332,0.0000051986717,0.000023900197,0.048804935,0.8871329,0.006489523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011328272,0.000038084356,0.032860674,0.000023124208,0.000012554994,1.6927653e-7,0.004183584,1.2437687e-7,0.000065795204,0.00033319189,0.9622558,0.00011366952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85828435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99790025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7924714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028525325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044693373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99907273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792315035","doi":"","title":"Ontario. Legislative Assembly. Select Committee on Constitutional and Intergovernmental Affairs","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Public administration; General assembly; Law","score_opus":0.020953462134790456,"score_gpt":0.26430350871536484,"score_spread":0.24335004658057438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792315035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22318257,0.00020648674,9.309618e-7,0.0034478134,0.00048726727,0.00027484773,0.00013411546,0.000017041446,0.7722489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934367,0.0016738275,0.00019977531,0.00011304296,0.00016585206,0.000018942694,0.0000077775685,0.000005862735,0.0043782354],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986197,0.00007648849,0.0001970403,0.00025612785,0.00042824203,0.00042241722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989713,0.00012777689,0.00024734062,0.00019477893,0.000101932754,0.00035688494],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022605863,0.00018337758,0.00025314547,0.0002948418,0.002329217,0.00013610328,0.00036987843,0.00012804953,0.00017951877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003154145,0.00016619034,0.00011825898,0.00025708455,0.0047368435,0.00033982506,0.000066919216,0.00018021771,0.000011588599],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036252757,0.000046913552,0.6366559,0.00001113785,0.00024207197,0.00002653636,0.027116068,5.1888185e-7,0.000017998538,0.28813547,0.04526642,0.002444663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023830768,0.00006807305,0.28852335,0.000035587997,0.000023491413,8.6307807e-7,0.0056527886,3.3337852e-7,0.0000125632905,0.0002515777,0.705011,0.00018206585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95732856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99864477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77025414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043265728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004533843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792482631","doi":"","title":"The Canadian abridgment, second edition. Index to Canadian Legal Literature","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); History; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.011439405573109275,"score_gpt":0.24320847779810317,"score_spread":0.2317690722249939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792482631","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017287288,0.0006165941,9.691464e-7,0.084916145,0.0017741102,0.0009352233,0.0013746762,0.000039303945,0.8930557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85135627,0.00055399747,0.00006158069,0.0040165163,0.0014765762,0.00011196423,0.000022705799,0.000033114797,0.1423673],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968632,0.00016673462,0.00038533038,0.00040161592,0.00055441004,0.0016287365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99481153,0.0002147607,0.00013505203,0.0003646023,0.0004789908,0.003995049],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006011136,0.00028603815,0.00028794518,0.0006030523,0.0035370013,0.00035637582,0.0007715432,0.0003024207,0.00073383225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088118215,0.00019322567,0.00013173795,0.0007278026,0.0005259572,0.00042093277,0.000034229623,0.00027450972,0.0001689421],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008833327,0.0000054674642,0.009379886,0.0000119929455,0.00009197012,0.00013003097,0.011718001,0.0000012384403,0.000012571694,0.15472214,0.8102451,0.013672759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016333089,0.00002369157,0.059696015,0.00007254601,0.000012204289,0.0000026694688,0.0008729448,2.6266048e-7,0.00000710736,0.0005375227,0.93830556,0.0003061655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83406895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004226025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007923929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792519585","doi":"","title":"Canadian constitutional law in a modern perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Constitutional law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.019238556823360287,"score_gpt":0.26425012786425184,"score_spread":0.24501157104089155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792519585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02470602,0.000334986,0.0000037212403,0.013668988,0.00025011614,0.0003676181,0.00022701966,0.000022568824,0.96041894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861002,0.0003291632,0.00013720934,0.0005593421,0.00019905494,0.000035631077,0.000002899093,0.000008489016,0.012627993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834555,0.000106841464,0.00023526214,0.00027205618,0.00031688495,0.0007233911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854976,0.00013868455,0.000079166704,0.00013112044,0.00022589153,0.0008753616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027510428,0.00014896288,0.00023619708,0.0003265721,0.0005550239,0.00002561298,0.00027217832,0.00015118488,0.0003490243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047468275,0.00011912926,0.00007504355,0.00027810346,0.0015311985,0.00025010845,0.000018863384,0.00011339896,0.000049655846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033448525,0.0000062886675,0.012511889,0.0000024306648,0.000018898994,0.000038319078,0.010284555,0.0000018937154,0.0000073041656,0.9730868,0.0025108817,0.0015274253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038592712,0.000015918347,0.021119839,0.00006364219,0.000011924442,0.0000017309769,0.0058188187,0.0000014399715,0.0000056845256,0.020555848,0.9517311,0.00028813395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99936825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9613942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040354333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003772949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792573176","doi":"","title":"Statutes of Saskatchewan judicially considered, 1965-1978.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Statute of limitations; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.020735975737622665,"score_gpt":0.2589427486646218,"score_spread":0.23820677292699913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792573176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20675059,0.0005758496,0.0000045874563,0.005160422,0.000494199,0.00053749414,0.0003141857,0.000054936307,0.7861077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709931,0.0010634387,0.00075520395,0.00028342006,0.00029735756,0.00002050001,0.0000038632897,0.000017052571,0.026566042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794954,0.00015033215,0.00047470484,0.00026665017,0.0005033983,0.0006553453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981495,0.00044341286,0.00032576197,0.00022659637,0.00030327757,0.00055144366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040420864,0.00019057882,0.00043669,0.00021191004,0.00038111123,0.000019108364,0.0003522283,0.00016405818,0.0005546869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009266996,0.000143244,0.0001369295,0.00028178756,0.0010921184,0.0002055162,0.0000447351,0.000094048635,0.00003402237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009006837,0.00013284384,0.1750219,0.00017087368,0.0006147905,0.00013849438,0.1814148,0.0000034497716,0.0021070663,0.38292357,0.14183606,0.11554607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041648714,0.000054846725,0.027380005,0.00009990843,0.000044260007,7.505806e-7,0.009197048,1.06385016e-7,0.00027759027,0.0034340613,0.9588067,0.0002882223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93022555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99098617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81697065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028788642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021730913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6073432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792780372","doi":"","title":"British Columbia. Legislative Assembly. Special Committee on Constitutional Matters","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Legislative assembly; General assembly; Law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.02153820829006628,"score_gpt":0.26421642961953984,"score_spread":0.24267822132947356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792780372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108604155,0.00016177825,7.383363e-7,0.012599704,0.0021171367,0.0004901585,0.00057581573,0.000040365598,0.87541014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9702041,0.0056373477,0.00039851308,0.001354234,0.004433672,0.00006101063,0.000046644265,0.00002078726,0.017843693],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980789,0.00012491143,0.00029257924,0.00031982496,0.00056351844,0.00062030007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984882,0.00015242594,0.0003496944,0.00029603878,0.0002409586,0.00047271184],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031330317,0.00016053578,0.00033710356,0.0002866019,0.003685176,0.00064685906,0.00068605447,0.0001854347,0.0012991306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005718606,0.00022052627,0.00022354432,0.0005111165,0.007330749,0.0004134394,0.00006110598,0.00019597572,0.00004166863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062777863,0.0000330944,0.17619024,0.0000088822435,0.000106965075,0.000055513377,0.002979968,6.3233415e-7,0.000002275347,0.032477744,0.78460664,0.0035317945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021343459,0.00002782071,0.30582044,0.000046731817,0.00001997051,0.0000011235746,0.0014412858,1.3982377e-7,9.0753014e-7,0.00046049,0.691769,0.00019863101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9810956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8615999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018783094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042197187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792781619","doi":"","title":"Report of the Canadian Bar Association.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Geography; Philosophy; Meteorology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.016522969895768336,"score_gpt":0.2482758187746218,"score_spread":0.23175284887885345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792781619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0716486,0.00012322301,2.9261665e-7,0.02878222,0.0007346135,0.0003828916,0.00014623371,0.000017051272,0.89816487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86819994,0.00023194515,0.00008176439,0.00029244923,0.00025610017,0.000017547953,0.000001978689,0.000011312097,0.13090695],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980893,0.00015521384,0.00037820116,0.00019017722,0.00059904816,0.0005880593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815214,0.00020859002,0.00041577182,0.00026717983,0.00037265985,0.0005836731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007456664,0.00012143783,0.00024301613,0.00014219129,0.0008334083,0.000021257596,0.00043200757,0.00019026797,0.00041925552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031324115,0.00007605075,0.00014012863,0.0003217722,0.00035733782,0.00013571238,0.000029851471,0.00010217583,0.000029846162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021064118,0.00000966702,0.7412036,0.000012825327,0.00011995804,0.000045920475,0.008788149,9.89188e-7,0.000027373735,0.0875466,0.1581211,0.004121693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084267325,0.000005068702,0.24580431,0.000025940195,0.000019219146,0.0000010112523,0.0003253173,5.7197948e-8,0.000023894658,0.00047383117,0.75313926,0.000097812306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9980427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99991095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79655135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023866058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003385311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6409987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792854116","doi":"","title":"The consolidated orders in council of Canada ...","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.024852416755865758,"score_gpt":0.23418550060092927,"score_spread":0.20933308384506352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792854116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22202325,0.00041977625,1.9539688e-7,0.01017524,0.0003595176,0.0003311168,0.0000946811,0.000010368442,0.7665858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96842784,0.0010194256,0.000021444228,0.0001642966,0.000058997426,0.0000173699,8.0858706e-7,0.000007915653,0.030281885],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982996,0.00012172836,0.00030916292,0.00013916106,0.00060604425,0.00052431994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860007,0.00045145417,0.00016548803,0.00015103424,0.0003611834,0.000270767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005912297,0.00010492165,0.00021090644,0.000051754363,0.00040156138,0.000011139382,0.00032914118,0.000071722825,0.00010319566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001651891,0.00006312661,0.00003773935,0.00028151274,0.0006345046,0.00007721154,0.00002140401,0.0000700487,0.0000029180178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008313107,0.00003977275,0.13291867,0.00005834149,0.000245832,0.000099607525,0.061972577,0.000008952527,0.00019567234,0.2694375,0.49917245,0.0357675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021779857,0.00000907378,0.025576416,0.000031359992,0.0000061948467,1.8769542e-7,0.0031473772,3.1012956e-7,0.000020448553,0.0002981304,0.9705861,0.00010656579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7464046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002333346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013736961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99185425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792878582","doi":"","title":"Constitutional law of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01665031955606958,"score_gpt":0.2386969532323604,"score_spread":0.22204663367629082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792878582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02476435,0.00017852339,0.0000023853634,0.004734672,0.0003910584,0.00018437947,0.00025313615,0.0000118084545,0.9694797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98177654,0.00021639663,0.00014679943,0.0002998065,0.00016710853,0.000009966258,0.0000023365167,0.0000039977667,0.017377038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987235,0.00006261104,0.00025055427,0.00014011866,0.00042245345,0.00040076533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989491,0.00019270966,0.00014075686,0.000111071546,0.00019903465,0.00040730266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019269035,0.000098671866,0.00020936326,0.000045390232,0.00040223153,0.0000064405417,0.00022331053,0.0000722108,0.00044613433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040220883,0.00007202528,0.00005447311,0.0001405894,0.0016609197,0.000112768845,0.00001979248,0.000048244423,0.0000059682584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027970943,0.000004276698,0.006147774,0.0000075045855,0.000026567759,0.000008861347,0.0009482982,7.1035015e-7,0.000024618425,0.967437,0.023929588,0.001461948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015371936,0.000008737502,0.009229148,0.00003438865,0.000010123631,5.183205e-7,0.0004922301,6.6807395e-8,0.00006694902,0.00092462363,0.98896205,0.00011744218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9993493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96651244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061097834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034243937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6119728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792955554","doi":"","title":"Halsbury's Laws of Canada. Customs and excise","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excise; International trade; Law; Customs union; Business; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.013547986315412113,"score_gpt":0.23297933061785459,"score_spread":0.21943134430244246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792955554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26288715,0.00085793703,0.0000013634318,0.0071346005,0.0003623176,0.0003755071,0.00018537555,0.000022209151,0.72817355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95040894,0.0015967281,0.00014401907,0.00019845479,0.00018885895,0.000017562048,0.0000015665935,0.000014432942,0.047429413],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839276,0.000094766016,0.00031330122,0.00022141299,0.0004313247,0.00054642727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986058,0.00022188258,0.00019309172,0.00016960915,0.00017949686,0.00063011626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029420268,0.0001529181,0.00032742685,0.000116944015,0.00037552541,0.000013203218,0.00025316942,0.0001093642,0.00023514208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005902589,0.00011135266,0.00005291413,0.00019618975,0.0006018067,0.00014981668,0.000040021765,0.00006875396,0.0000038538633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005299422,0.000053544354,0.12484349,0.00018553852,0.00029380372,0.00013987905,0.03557351,0.0000027701776,0.00049999706,0.31170675,0.4106264,0.11602133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023186783,0.000018418377,0.041704707,0.00005550802,0.000020269134,7.5710443e-7,0.0014053968,2.6797701e-7,0.000063174135,0.0004950456,0.9558178,0.00018676887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9980059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6875218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043918652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018299193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45408297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792988424","doi":"","title":"The consolidated statutes for Upper Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.01685241843464094,"score_gpt":0.2559071244284409,"score_spread":0.23905470599379994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792988424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.089892685,0.0012736848,0.000006067242,0.06791441,0.0015673332,0.0015833414,0.0011791344,0.000063916996,0.8365194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8359636,0.0029293695,0.00026686816,0.0008988807,0.0005313884,0.00016989034,0.000011849606,0.00002886199,0.15919928],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984963,0.00008526399,0.0002463155,0.0001778204,0.00031165287,0.0006826448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813384,0.0008751358,0.00013535359,0.00016274677,0.00026546264,0.00042748055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003066123,0.00012828875,0.00018641967,0.00005423428,0.0012654306,0.000037707097,0.00035029577,0.000075467375,0.00010435715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011830528,0.000072413015,0.000067614026,0.00014718171,0.00051560265,0.000105482155,0.000021654336,0.00005491588,0.0000069081257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022262439,0.000006620468,0.011186863,0.000013144965,0.000119236705,0.000007958365,0.0052312072,3.3269927e-7,0.000035899797,0.24681644,0.7089152,0.027644875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019475303,0.000012480296,0.010123436,0.000017625143,0.00001548718,2.1995602e-7,0.0020302199,2.6021544e-7,0.000036865415,0.00074125093,0.9866857,0.00014168466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99784267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7460709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063902617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032271703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9732797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793026735","doi":"","title":"The revised statutes of Nova-Scotia : second series","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Series (stratigraphy); Statute; Political science; History; Law; Geology; Archaeology; Engineering; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.018123166798605237,"score_gpt":0.2536717292926931,"score_spread":0.23554856249408787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793026735","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2206821,0.0013339911,0.0000011518699,0.009789962,0.0006195716,0.0005335769,0.00022748082,0.000031238436,0.7667809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8968594,0.0035676705,0.0002891381,0.00015983994,0.00031699872,0.000015670219,0.0000029195223,0.000019449184,0.098768935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984621,0.00013639535,0.0003655379,0.00017981697,0.00034055024,0.0005155976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985413,0.00043327705,0.0002599294,0.00022512148,0.00024318713,0.00029720837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046925832,0.00014281567,0.0002723691,0.00008340998,0.00051699334,0.000031058124,0.00040231418,0.0000924162,0.0007452226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088151667,0.000082233004,0.00010256009,0.00023152499,0.0010972467,0.0002523233,0.000039277038,0.000075961805,0.00003254265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007520135,0.00003361008,0.08370669,0.00015206878,0.00034161017,0.000024472625,0.044452045,7.01053e-7,0.00086047023,0.55170393,0.25132895,0.06732025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001622583,0.000030582265,0.039062668,0.000052015697,0.000016451098,3.9240513e-7,0.0021785684,3.466268e-8,0.00018245075,0.0010219002,0.95715547,0.0001372403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6764271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99081737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7058265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020301052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006546711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8159665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793058798","doi":"","title":"First principles, second thoughts: Aboriginal peoples, constitutional reform, and Canadian statecraft","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Political economy; Law; Development economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.017121449876318813,"score_gpt":0.25588349225261736,"score_spread":0.23876204237629856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793058798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12073257,0.00078742194,0.0000055337555,0.01007968,0.00053131726,0.000576679,0.0012823469,0.000050472918,0.865954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92587346,0.005305574,0.0007232738,0.0004472776,0.00070073013,0.00006104351,0.00002295348,0.000020295533,0.06684538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795943,0.00007793704,0.00035313322,0.00034521008,0.00038394026,0.00088031817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977803,0.00018472466,0.00015850252,0.00018548289,0.00020445511,0.0014865282],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037870032,0.00022567896,0.0003034161,0.00029527966,0.0013236462,0.00005980397,0.00030394024,0.00018000999,0.00078975316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030655673,0.0001657996,0.00006677094,0.00025311776,0.0015546738,0.00037206878,0.000026779271,0.00013148483,0.000043230502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012057978,0.000011494225,0.0598998,0.000056140558,0.00008442728,0.00008272838,0.010318175,0.0000018037618,0.0000074345016,0.90854055,0.019378431,0.0016069456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029350203,0.000021076534,0.06705113,0.00007557885,0.000017914042,0.0000054079405,0.0014829781,6.59917e-7,0.000005940095,0.0005487372,0.9302278,0.00026928703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9899691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91084933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024018812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059546717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793060671","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Constitution and constitutional amendment: highlights = [La Constitution canadienne et sa modification: sommaire]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.025062006615031347,"score_gpt":0.2630561485837412,"score_spread":0.23799414196870985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793060671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025004335,0.00068975263,0.000054390082,0.045600265,0.00079210167,0.0007567276,0.00042006184,0.0000496957,0.92663264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916953,0.0027489618,0.00012158218,0.00034472946,0.00017637825,0.0000675418,0.000019294814,0.0000051870325,0.00482104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979898,0.00025487758,0.00034993244,0.0003137421,0.00033727093,0.00075442926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776894,0.00042727843,0.00018912212,0.00019712166,0.00028866477,0.001128855],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008383078,0.00020126006,0.0002202295,0.00023044336,0.0035034022,0.0001296143,0.00026707113,0.00019446175,0.00007691596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007010183,0.00013560885,0.000060434977,0.00023836817,0.010584736,0.00035364865,0.000024270526,0.00013570032,0.00002670875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046646724,0.0000046518494,0.0024549859,0.0000044406183,0.000035432015,0.00001583835,0.0020408605,0.0000022398403,0.000019444595,0.98760235,0.004680028,0.0031350814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033077697,0.000014073249,0.0107398415,0.000059898026,0.000030774838,0.00001079356,0.00077302294,0.0000015195209,0.000015213419,0.003439862,0.98436004,0.00022420463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99982786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98416245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020375953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067051877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793098840","doi":"","title":"Constitutional law of Canada: cases, notes and materials, second edition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.017385713057338353,"score_gpt":0.2318292100849325,"score_spread":0.21444349702759416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793098840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43063965,0.00040366108,0.0000034675063,0.0049256017,0.00094301905,0.00038408823,0.0025445446,0.000018104556,0.56013787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99639976,0.00024370103,0.000108898676,0.00019555633,0.00029366443,0.000011328737,0.000009966231,0.0000039886536,0.002733108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989629,0.00006850565,0.00024263992,0.00014707497,0.000270571,0.00030834158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990248,0.00029845172,0.00014679444,0.000076741286,0.00015118196,0.00030199293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019637938,0.00010253626,0.00021592832,0.000043580138,0.00040220562,0.000012864785,0.000102097554,0.00008169984,0.0006689255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045855023,0.000077978024,0.000024639829,0.00007154167,0.0014420383,0.0001566151,0.000019689856,0.000035472498,0.0000020089487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008504191,0.000006139177,0.00252514,0.000033710203,0.000036843103,0.000029428904,0.0011295074,1.5831793e-7,0.00042169142,0.9764444,0.01830901,0.0010554321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002211657,0.000019158862,0.021139424,0.00005682234,0.00001716704,0.0000045477564,0.00044093802,3.3962106e-8,0.0009795646,0.0009560243,0.9760088,0.00015639457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9754884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003660407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015853264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7324266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793178252","doi":"","title":"Acts of the General Assembly of Newfoundland: passed in the nineteenth year of the reign of His Majesty King George V","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reign; George (robot); Majesty; Ancient history; Art; History; Archaeology; Law; Art history; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.021370649955524977,"score_gpt":0.2562147992470349,"score_spread":0.2348441492915099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793178252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8035682,0.00011300575,4.2794292e-7,0.002578192,0.00019045707,0.00042386624,0.00007432253,0.0000034442048,0.19304812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99574894,0.0002505837,0.00007493365,0.00008039794,0.000105863466,0.000010024398,7.8375217e-7,0.000009119903,0.0037193333],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980571,0.000384582,0.00047834957,0.00014612912,0.00059429364,0.00033952403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984465,0.00035257786,0.00059545744,0.0003471858,0.00017061588,0.00008766123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007108528,0.00012808357,0.00034044345,0.000079870675,0.00016616886,0.000006728465,0.0007948699,0.00010889257,0.000049367714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072357786,0.000059098347,0.00017071763,0.0003809774,0.0006760816,0.00009301413,0.000074937,0.00010952245,8.0156383e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003079978,0.0000666616,0.7915834,0.00009709908,0.00012300411,0.000002791933,0.035848606,0.00001506726,0.00495597,0.15987803,0.0047674915,0.0026310442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044116238,0.00003999968,0.8682296,0.00017679657,0.00004955746,3.2255963e-7,0.0022478164,0.0000015033077,0.0009120953,0.00069728855,0.12707913,0.00012472122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7739434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93393856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1921808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020148663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005675293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24910507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793197964","doi":"","title":"The Canadian constitution: historically explained by annotated statutes original documents and leading cases","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Statute; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.019852782486698115,"score_gpt":0.26944791308609384,"score_spread":0.24959513059939573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793197964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07235626,0.0030710609,0.0000034948096,0.022087688,0.0010855306,0.00076931535,0.0004361952,0.000067712535,0.90012276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94419676,0.0028784482,0.00014065232,0.0002666817,0.0002098239,0.000042651183,0.000009647308,0.000010773155,0.05224456],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823576,0.0001301623,0.00028584382,0.00024891892,0.00035338567,0.000745947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980853,0.00045557972,0.00014270304,0.00013268422,0.00019992048,0.0009838217],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000373,0.00017321967,0.00021950774,0.00013692203,0.0028029087,0.00010786562,0.00025306974,0.000110745474,0.00012277704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094207475,0.00011174498,0.000044225824,0.00023292164,0.0013006305,0.0003024303,0.000020053101,0.00010055121,0.000024126015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030134506,0.000012900803,0.054590665,0.000017301732,0.00014254713,0.00020700607,0.009381626,4.820807e-7,0.00008464285,0.39400083,0.5164523,0.025079565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022783727,0.000030588617,0.0024720996,0.00003060051,0.000019488476,0.000004163298,0.0007368411,2.0872005e-7,0.000009844776,0.00028646915,0.9959911,0.00019076446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9941011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99958366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8718405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016767464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022426334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793254081","doi":"","title":"In the Supreme Court of Canada (on appeal from the Appeal Division of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia) between Her Majesty","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Majesty; Law; Nova scotia; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.024724982311913432,"score_gpt":0.25506598140421327,"score_spread":0.23034099909229983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793254081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.898847,0.00022204808,0.0000012283778,0.023858348,0.00043908824,0.00080628355,0.0008217749,0.0000057339653,0.074998535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99792284,0.00011982789,0.000024363013,0.00033552086,0.00026404826,0.000007445487,0.0000054988764,0.000014830911,0.0013056232],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99685794,0.0004875452,0.00062365807,0.00025808788,0.0012117767,0.0005610029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752367,0.0011099788,0.00048126234,0.00048335292,0.0002106825,0.00019106494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010025193,0.00021598858,0.0004806457,0.000064830456,0.000314567,0.000013004006,0.001231434,0.00014418454,0.00014999331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061706285,0.00010333221,0.00014922087,0.00035358456,0.00099448,0.00011666412,0.00010163697,0.0002172881,0.0000034008237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029118717,0.000046713183,0.89057237,0.000038629525,0.00014435066,0.0000062036083,0.021800753,0.000012714823,0.00018646153,0.011939319,0.072874464,0.002348925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041170776,0.00004868988,0.8532407,0.00021880488,0.000050606413,1.7758269e-7,0.0037524917,0.0000010172917,0.00022271184,0.0007577434,0.14112312,0.00017222829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99781966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99965334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09907588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042543304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015744478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42137653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793317028","doi":"","title":"Tables to the statutes of Saskatchewan and Saskatchewan regulations.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.014847280400379075,"score_gpt":0.246779970539724,"score_spread":0.23193269013934492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793317028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77207875,0.0008486054,0.000018189372,0.031998552,0.00032876804,0.00097611046,0.0004351687,0.000041869545,0.19327398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9622176,0.00038527773,0.0008538515,0.0002355807,0.00018242068,0.000028889763,0.0000027577014,0.000011618631,0.03608196],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867016,0.000112983085,0.0002841365,0.00019899487,0.00032547754,0.00040826297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875784,0.00032130268,0.00015328212,0.00020579106,0.0001777411,0.00038404713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004111877,0.00012995515,0.000239074,0.00012819858,0.00049872854,0.00002505714,0.00027199794,0.00008306492,0.00014626532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004482318,0.00007774621,0.000055702447,0.00029338672,0.00057538867,0.0001575739,0.000049362257,0.0000549184,0.000008479487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003989002,0.00004259182,0.10701568,0.000080372185,0.00022569027,0.000009647407,0.55071187,0.000014525393,0.00082028785,0.06694734,0.09890035,0.17519176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014710239,0.000029638923,0.07939361,0.000054459677,0.00002414381,3.55472e-7,0.04044493,2.939408e-7,0.00010294338,0.0009688441,0.878681,0.00015265225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.905533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99537665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7797807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016342915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007606715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38358673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793412683","doi":"","title":"Statutes of the province of Newfoundland and Labrador.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Geography; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.012679185404558688,"score_gpt":0.23931313476085542,"score_spread":0.22663394935629672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793412683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6947754,0.0005745766,0.000001142289,0.0039243777,0.00018185642,0.00041051037,0.00014157235,0.000009482992,0.2999811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785993,0.0010200762,0.00013910001,0.000056890185,0.000074334486,0.000006127794,4.2195995e-7,0.00000651783,0.020097237],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990511,0.000084882595,0.00022452678,0.0001246451,0.00026333568,0.00025149275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991485,0.00020616924,0.00021677444,0.00014065596,0.00012027818,0.00016766264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020621649,0.0000871135,0.00020484667,0.000058689573,0.00020288937,0.000007974623,0.00023278304,0.000064774,0.000057759073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045857686,0.000048560392,0.000051359973,0.00014266135,0.000911798,0.000120750396,0.000043037355,0.000045232224,0.0000012501708],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002678012,0.000037313654,0.6326276,0.00016740726,0.00013299893,0.000007937871,0.029352624,0.0000010082118,0.0006882958,0.26123688,0.016141238,0.059579886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024532713,0.00003252451,0.35041046,0.00009040488,0.00002368778,3.292878e-7,0.0010415727,1.8009506e-7,0.00012530498,0.0010795409,0.6468388,0.00011185173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8708075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98621374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63069755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013436045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061001495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33595577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793426064","doi":"","title":"[Term 17 of the Terms of Union between Newfoundland and Canada respecting denominational education rights: information kit]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Term (time); Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.010097844544984518,"score_gpt":0.23872164164692206,"score_spread":0.22862379710193753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793426064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76327884,0.0000396105,0.000001799307,0.0024805418,0.00021461441,0.00025149412,0.000097007214,0.000003668741,0.2336324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996006,0.000058429232,0.00006802548,0.0000426433,0.00013801386,0.0000064592855,0.0000062565427,0.0000026872283,0.0036714731],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999085,0.00008044779,0.00029198275,0.00007593043,0.00030532703,0.00016130383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905217,0.00019514852,0.00034763126,0.00009367277,0.00018544028,0.00012593012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002474239,0.00007326675,0.00014179441,0.00009576489,0.00033943288,0.000012651653,0.00016774928,0.000056689965,0.000023218017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034034814,0.00004571412,0.000027741284,0.00012310174,0.0002573501,0.00030082063,0.000024530125,0.000044327324,3.5107905e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004126083,0.000005855602,0.9120841,0.000037603506,0.00003520092,2.0338334e-7,0.010179549,6.9024765e-7,0.00003673821,0.04374204,0.0059149214,0.027958993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011144442,0.000008064621,0.73189324,0.00007016989,0.000014754224,2.3257925e-7,0.0006814476,1.4337216e-7,0.00003667779,0.00092645525,0.2661944,0.00006294598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99748373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26027948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006337264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016751488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2971642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793502496","doi":"","title":"The revised statutes of Newfoundland, 1970 : a revision and consolidation of the public general statutes of Newfoundland as […]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Consolidation (business); Law; Political science; Business; Accounting","score_opus":0.01914372398383035,"score_gpt":0.2666826400378011,"score_spread":0.24753891605397077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793502496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9114059,0.0026552859,0.0000034831614,0.008631284,0.0002892441,0.00082367496,0.00018410289,0.000010848237,0.075996175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804517,0.012260282,0.00016652151,0.00007703104,0.00012213673,0.000011705806,0.0000047913823,0.000010991207,0.006894866],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810874,0.00030032243,0.0005366414,0.00018869253,0.000494157,0.0003714328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772453,0.00070740236,0.00064072775,0.00027133466,0.00043416562,0.00022182547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007087163,0.00014779005,0.00036045324,0.000102663595,0.0005013158,0.00004051396,0.00036789768,0.00009686755,0.00007299578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018757918,0.00007616299,0.00010613662,0.00030071393,0.0013416694,0.00024052613,0.000071843126,0.00007905176,0.0000016692582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094871946,0.000047115507,0.47881085,0.00023075956,0.0002687535,0.000003124088,0.020351531,0.0000017102132,0.0016965623,0.39881468,0.012938405,0.08674162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005234839,0.00007551888,0.11727846,0.00020016792,0.00005414566,9.166892e-7,0.0012483,0.0000016228392,0.00010791546,0.0019884047,0.87837106,0.00015003556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65408057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9016661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8654326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019702464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009161472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49434367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793588651","doi":"","title":"Acts of the General Assembly of Newfoundland.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.022497712769581783,"score_gpt":0.26893297475418476,"score_spread":0.24643526198460297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793588651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47047162,0.00014233998,9.8181e-7,0.0033616587,0.00033778255,0.00023686892,0.000057108846,0.000008655288,0.525383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9705494,0.00050875347,0.00014950598,0.0000944905,0.0002192838,0.000008077826,7.2639847e-7,0.00000883737,0.02846093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986558,0.00013099922,0.00030332102,0.0001400699,0.00040850393,0.00036131302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989075,0.0001683911,0.00029111258,0.0002091124,0.0001904845,0.00023341415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027733628,0.000110413486,0.00026351772,0.00008418282,0.00023820932,0.000008042928,0.00043075794,0.00010341707,0.00011509146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059175806,0.00006247443,0.00013194545,0.00023950243,0.0005691883,0.00012218724,0.000046546225,0.000059120946,0.0000060205925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028225062,0.000057841036,0.3649054,0.000083595376,0.00022824973,0.000008159158,0.02788055,0.000005609345,0.0044649295,0.55311114,0.028702985,0.020523367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022673189,0.000023909666,0.23130295,0.000059872065,0.000026244754,2.906751e-7,0.00044237255,3.1094137e-7,0.00037841336,0.00056294765,0.7668584,0.0001175372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8429088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9758042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7381554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025206702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006841535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25476333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793623321","doi":"","title":"The Canadian constitution, 1980: explanation of a proposed resolution respecting the Constitution of Canada = La [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Resolution (logic); Law; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.017841942382357062,"score_gpt":0.2449124058181146,"score_spread":0.22707046343575754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793623321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04458095,0.00041732777,0.000010318242,0.014928008,0.00056432886,0.0008368536,0.00020716399,0.000015379186,0.93843967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966027,0.0003207122,0.000056448298,0.00006520271,0.00011307128,0.000018497378,0.000003795568,0.000004449213,0.0028151127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980394,0.00033803345,0.000442734,0.00016314937,0.00054824614,0.00046843212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978284,0.00072573597,0.0004045974,0.00019791232,0.0005401648,0.00030316302],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012562912,0.00012151495,0.00019798649,0.00013909866,0.002112081,0.000026771413,0.0003332975,0.00011406181,0.000026625728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032557386,0.00006925276,0.000058041365,0.0003600659,0.0021584313,0.00014230213,0.000018742365,0.000112388254,0.0000012913126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013802516,0.000004227192,0.0071677743,0.000013150329,0.000045841964,0.0000061464953,0.004634756,0.000011942413,0.000078689605,0.9731156,0.012095568,0.0028124892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025181496,0.000018587676,0.025993427,0.000109703506,0.000030107025,0.0000024001831,0.004559448,0.000003816562,0.00019695026,0.0010839145,0.9676105,0.00013932929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9720317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019707486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015844936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99918705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793653231","doi":"","title":"Dr. Henry Morgentaler, Dr. Leslie Smoling, Dr. Robert Scott v. Her Majesty the Queen and the Attorney General of Canada: coram: The [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Law; Art; Political science; Biology; Zoology","score_opus":0.01680659888338371,"score_gpt":0.24361894600172596,"score_spread":0.22681234711834225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793653231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4159275,0.0051092072,0.0000032964338,0.16924392,0.0014290329,0.0019429842,0.0003154689,0.000041907424,0.40598667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85488564,0.0030630215,0.000039436964,0.0024920325,0.0008188128,0.000087136854,0.000004917363,0.000036610505,0.13857238],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973408,0.00044153014,0.00046951018,0.00030462458,0.00069438166,0.0007491316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803996,0.0005890579,0.0003431672,0.00041373615,0.00020071784,0.00041336496],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091862876,0.00026644435,0.00041491966,0.00005087041,0.0014774312,0.000054607666,0.0007963292,0.00013502715,0.00018102057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005673191,0.00011711463,0.00014072467,0.00024038223,0.0024558655,0.0001338802,0.00012486335,0.00021579067,0.000004677083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065154956,0.000026167443,0.07783192,0.000037823967,0.0003747831,0.00002599475,0.021297257,0.000014825322,0.000045585115,0.17703784,0.71662164,0.0066210087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050788047,0.000015390582,0.07871736,0.00004418961,0.000065686734,0.0000021349983,0.0026680727,0.0000038894223,0.00002678651,0.00062057824,0.917116,0.00021204198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9972989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43895814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005655704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002047602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793790820","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Constitution 1980: proposed resolution respecting the Constitution of Canada = La Constitution canadienne: projet [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.017527808115029107,"score_gpt":0.24026990508618234,"score_spread":0.22274209697115324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793790820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040108968,0.0004316128,0.000010122479,0.021514874,0.0012421727,0.0015571183,0.0003053297,0.000036813846,0.934793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99395597,0.00039417087,0.0000734058,0.000155172,0.00023312424,0.000050020404,0.000009344342,0.000007535638,0.0051212357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679506,0.0005793902,0.00058396277,0.00032230275,0.00061460765,0.0011046574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971039,0.00070727384,0.0004577006,0.00032525076,0.0006431874,0.00076262956],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002095906,0.00023511949,0.00029543607,0.00021042499,0.0051887385,0.0000809407,0.00050800684,0.00021275788,0.000032955355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004028873,0.00013790157,0.00008979184,0.00056092173,0.004724553,0.00025424932,0.000034086523,0.00024621392,0.000004056453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018091483,0.0000049265986,0.0062619727,0.000014006599,0.000053930446,0.00002414213,0.0028691262,0.0000150014785,0.000052443684,0.9761876,0.010840455,0.0036583117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030755793,0.000023041546,0.012615147,0.00013539549,0.00004469576,0.000009739912,0.003427351,0.000005842762,0.00007663851,0.00078458467,0.9823395,0.00023047806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.975403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056534875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036498807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99816364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793791833","doi":"","title":"Indigenous difference and the Constitution of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Constitution; Political science; Geography; Socioeconomics; Ethnology; Sociology; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.012068612195263,"score_gpt":0.2203253538642565,"score_spread":0.2082567416689935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793791833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49755806,0.0007693982,0.0000029113085,0.0046374467,0.00024811586,0.00042387325,0.00009407518,0.000008773684,0.49625733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898051,0.0013898428,0.00002833125,0.0001264418,0.00006687705,0.000012830781,6.0828023e-7,0.0000027455828,0.008567194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990351,0.000103346356,0.00018836177,0.00010984511,0.00026458397,0.0002987644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999127,0.00030923914,0.0001402613,0.00009907524,0.00010642328,0.00021804875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002550887,0.00008220007,0.00019640687,0.00004624511,0.00050574914,0.000009070217,0.00018061647,0.000052704905,0.00003907176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056828995,0.000044426193,0.000029173792,0.00010826044,0.0014095552,0.000053890402,0.00002150053,0.00004782843,7.998895e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003816931,0.00001102237,0.08641904,0.000039689174,0.000105602536,0.000016083955,0.04738308,8.175495e-7,0.00007488603,0.814853,0.008349875,0.042708695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070281135,0.000018771112,0.19437768,0.0000661182,0.000033635668,0.0000013776386,0.0027730116,3.5451808e-7,0.00005195507,0.0020938893,0.7996976,0.00018283696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9991546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81275916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002873676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022366792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5193565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793840825","doi":"","title":"The provincial statutes of Lower-Canada : enacted by the King's Most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Statute; Advice (programming); Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.007383762400562832,"score_gpt":0.2113961434667358,"score_spread":0.20401238106617298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793840825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7792988,0.0031297333,9.3245006e-7,0.031689975,0.00016866531,0.0009919681,0.0006522629,0.000011641742,0.18405603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757742,0.002968003,0.00001577787,0.00027576106,0.000062709114,0.000027386453,0.0000026251566,0.000010656942,0.020862825],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986218,0.0001632659,0.00024435666,0.0001637737,0.00045229998,0.00035446664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998058,0.0011178707,0.0002882073,0.00016199681,0.00017697025,0.00019690867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003384781,0.00014108577,0.00021160077,0.000019568835,0.00073907117,0.000027440896,0.00028978472,0.000052160987,0.000017283232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028948902,0.000057470064,0.000023913324,0.00013119723,0.0018098064,0.000066489185,0.00005392103,0.00008722534,1.9073738e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016596884,0.000042264117,0.036524247,0.00009865836,0.00030417807,0.000011457327,0.022151088,6.5494817e-7,0.0008704421,0.014561017,0.8897321,0.035537906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002757284,0.0000701841,0.011382356,0.00004222826,0.000038163405,9.1678504e-7,0.0054478203,4.3715778e-7,0.000060504117,0.000053917902,0.9825148,0.00011292907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99606186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99964327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19647546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017350417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015378355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6668307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793890309","doi":"","title":"Legal position of Canadian Indians: current problems in constitutional law: seminar 1964-65, University of British Columbia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Position (finance); Political science; Constitutional law; Economics","score_opus":0.013354600305893818,"score_gpt":0.21745923334400702,"score_spread":0.20410463303811321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793890309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5197098,0.0007326915,0.0000032096514,0.0012969957,0.00036881267,0.00078415155,0.0027036415,0.000014579991,0.47438607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928441,0.0017728631,0.00012508075,0.000041119096,0.00006971478,0.000005188338,0.000020214798,0.0000062723707,0.0051154657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985091,0.00012451944,0.00031688545,0.00022819881,0.00034201518,0.00047928508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988082,0.0000858666,0.00021682074,0.00011103618,0.0002572697,0.0005207835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030438125,0.00009993124,0.00030375418,0.00029775998,0.00035123812,0.000021452157,0.00026115513,0.0001493741,0.0002665803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012876371,0.00013418676,0.00008811992,0.0004868899,0.0019465114,0.00024525722,0.000025287327,0.00011618612,0.0000063444104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020429572,0.00016253527,0.41127217,0.0002716592,0.00015493698,0.00023663245,0.020252068,0.000019510457,0.00023820865,0.46202138,0.078656875,0.026693597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042487937,0.00003352566,0.12101199,0.00044054666,0.000022630013,0.0000030753424,0.0014266564,3.5296438e-7,0.0000050609247,0.00042038664,0.8760211,0.00018980764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79736423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010062662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027308033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7172003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793993110","doi":"10.11575/prism/34331","title":"Wildlife and the Canadian Constitution","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Wildlife; Geography; Political science; Law; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.04146838654957441,"score_gpt":0.32251278009071227,"score_spread":0.28104439354113786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793993110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17162043,0.00017840914,0.0000010993945,0.03149691,0.000101724,0.00040715715,0.0000061229243,0.0000010939139,0.79618704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930769,0.000015042093,0.0002812025,0.00023609334,0.00011919004,0.000008466325,0.0000020107102,8.9003845e-7,0.006260185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950916,0.00008124741,0.00006355848,0.00008917536,0.000107604414,0.00014924991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999777,0.00005973568,0.00002470723,0.000041313513,0.000036659192,0.00006053836],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004585735,0.00003940431,0.00006892992,0.000007048664,0.0019077031,0.000336182,0.00015345524,0.00003605461,0.00036763947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011904208,0.000023691871,0.000013375559,0.00006580309,0.0011382671,0.00014234782,0.000041341045,0.000046304645,0.00011608303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004716851,0.000034110024,0.060481977,0.0000029262408,0.00007105387,0.000019848223,0.08673093,0.000025926416,0.000025833453,0.6988952,0.07709631,0.07656869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030758398,0.0000018922287,0.01161205,0.0000039797596,0.000008802033,4.0414548e-7,0.0035267763,0.000004951961,0.000007299104,0.0004953296,0.98397905,0.00005189409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96187216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9913475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9068827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012361878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018705051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794133338","doi":"","title":"Constitutional law of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.01665031955606958,"score_gpt":0.2386969532323604,"score_spread":0.22204663367629082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794133338","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02476435,0.00017852339,0.0000023853634,0.004734672,0.0003910584,0.00018437947,0.00025313615,0.0000118084545,0.9694797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98177654,0.00021639663,0.00014679943,0.0002998065,0.00016710853,0.000009966258,0.0000023365167,0.0000039977667,0.017377038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987235,0.00006261104,0.00025055427,0.00014011866,0.00042245345,0.00040076533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989491,0.00019270966,0.00014075686,0.000111071546,0.00019903465,0.00040730266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019269035,0.000098671866,0.00020936326,0.000045390232,0.00040223153,0.0000064405417,0.00022331053,0.0000722108,0.00044613433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040220883,0.00007202528,0.00005447311,0.0001405894,0.0016609197,0.000112768845,0.00001979248,0.000048244423,0.0000059682584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027970943,0.000004276698,0.006147774,0.0000075045855,0.000026567759,0.000008861347,0.0009482982,7.1035015e-7,0.000024618425,0.967437,0.023929588,0.001461948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015371936,0.000008737502,0.009229148,0.00003438865,0.000010123631,5.183205e-7,0.0004922301,6.6807395e-8,0.00006694902,0.00092462363,0.98896205,0.00011744218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9993493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96651244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061097834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034243937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6119728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794172358","doi":"","title":"Halsbury's laws of Canada. Cumulative supplement.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02049095158221385,"score_gpt":0.26339824491040964,"score_spread":0.2429072933281958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794172358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08535723,0.00029411537,0.0000040201453,0.01446791,0.00056876027,0.0006276691,0.000748802,0.000027018948,0.89790446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9320046,0.00051199226,0.00031191763,0.00023210926,0.00025345327,0.000028681916,0.000008420793,0.000017902192,0.06663096],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978073,0.00014756314,0.00044148558,0.00024702394,0.0006444123,0.00071219733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983161,0.00030554653,0.0002945647,0.00020621327,0.00029504206,0.00058249617],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037263884,0.0001822348,0.00037488263,0.00014075173,0.00043727417,0.00001191441,0.00037600962,0.000104123064,0.0012350153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006959415,0.00013489998,0.00008992162,0.00027768814,0.00047992563,0.00017752913,0.000045500667,0.00007753721,0.000007682349],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028847258,0.0000379613,0.061362516,0.00005867233,0.00026575362,0.00005101071,0.023234777,0.0000059430963,0.00019238869,0.31503353,0.5876854,0.01204319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002918419,0.000025550253,0.025329193,0.00004971538,0.00002320847,2.7659254e-7,0.0022423505,3.9296881e-7,0.00015985375,0.000783261,0.9708861,0.00020822398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9989856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99993944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8466473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091515435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027777723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794311322","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal law in Canada, 1998: a national conference of crucial importance to all first nations persons & advisors","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.024396256294623633,"score_gpt":0.2747568291469433,"score_spread":0.2503605728523197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794311322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32243243,0.00009000845,0.0000019779795,0.012785524,0.00027407182,0.0005091112,0.00083105423,0.000012597532,0.6630632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944842,0.0003261375,0.00028717914,0.00045839255,0.00013542436,0.00006069873,0.0000057374264,0.000008725877,0.0042335386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821556,0.000060132144,0.00036866276,0.00023388902,0.00064826943,0.00047346184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986736,0.00031378513,0.00017569539,0.00010185315,0.0002884822,0.00044657887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023768,0.00013830316,0.0002594164,0.00022332913,0.00036969807,0.000014693577,0.0003396961,0.00007185107,0.00021774277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051343994,0.00011760691,0.000053856573,0.00040572294,0.0002892842,0.0001918443,0.000014779049,0.00008052412,0.000008428606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000206761,0.00003101938,0.1561481,0.000034650002,0.00006260575,0.000028565255,0.03474861,0.00002303386,0.000038240698,0.77593684,0.0320704,0.0008572563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021690808,0.000016596898,0.0909888,0.000079343736,0.000008545921,3.7283237e-7,0.001716986,0.0000014770422,0.000009410043,0.00038621068,0.9063972,0.00017812694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99955267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8743268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021573731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069211056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795055472","doi":"10.5072/prism/29666","title":"\"A Union Not for Harmony but for Strength\": The General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Synod; Harmony (color); Theology; Art; Philosophy; Visual arts","score_opus":0.04628017641813037,"score_gpt":0.28080271698805287,"score_spread":0.2345225405699225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795055472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03588021,0.0012383347,0.000050351584,0.045521896,0.00185777,0.006535297,0.0028289345,0.000060240563,0.90602696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20475233,0.000389041,0.00032447407,0.00040806353,0.00058809196,0.00008611457,0.000017074877,0.000026501446,0.79340833],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984261,0.000053566848,0.0003533569,0.00022313844,0.00062757224,0.00031628666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982836,0.0005634995,0.00037767732,0.00023051072,0.00048542814,0.000059273556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033208495,0.00021519951,0.00039872032,0.000014478031,0.0010512733,0.000013150664,0.00059019984,0.00018607276,0.000112985086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002498836,0.000108640204,0.00031923575,0.000040057927,0.0007470241,0.000033386477,0.00010379474,0.00014976494,2.8653915e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006776528,0.000030754432,0.00016587933,0.00015670243,0.0006354022,9.967558e-7,0.01377639,0.000026212865,0.00040529837,0.42698643,0.5510073,0.0067409044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029182376,0.000047078403,0.0012008947,0.000042449796,0.00009723702,3.814564e-7,0.0022600945,0.000027225904,0.00094002037,0.0005542448,0.9943056,0.0002329225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71436536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8531282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44329837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033040362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007015407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.808565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W279526760","doi":"","title":"Prelude: Law and Community","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liturgy; Canon law; Bishops; Spirituality; Sociology; Theology; Law; Conversation; Gospel; Negotiation; Religious studies; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.08337031426653295,"score_gpt":0.369386150522983,"score_spread":0.28601583625645005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W279526760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042000733,0.12876733,0.0000066587377,0.0061512236,0.000060320803,0.0006369547,0.0000028596216,0.00012780432,0.82224613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88002014,0.10877577,0.00023809244,0.009913789,0.000032226435,0.000042990272,0.0000012241524,0.0000037123953,0.0009720558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966662,0.0026158933,0.00015947374,0.000131846,0.00016904458,0.0002575758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988777,0.00070268585,0.00006314724,0.00015776599,0.000065966065,0.00013274024],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019864829,0.000104441824,0.00029424258,0.0000039541083,0.0013789848,0.000026430997,0.00020458622,0.000070608556,0.00081257924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003774771,0.000063705505,0.000075260315,0.00015012073,0.0012805614,0.000073753195,0.00008304037,0.0003271314,0.000054681044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.922422e-7,0.000043763932,0.0007326149,0.000087043176,0.000011655157,0.0000016303508,0.0016174726,1.2807803e-8,0.0000036048143,0.99241835,0.001550483,0.003532371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072049894,0.00005859558,0.0027466987,0.00021449535,0.000031559175,0.0000018357987,0.0014861022,7.078109e-8,0.000006573178,0.02139566,0.9738596,0.00012677118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019652941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012515635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9723091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038941973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013452948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795275471","doi":"","title":"Acts of the Honourable Commission of Government of Newfoundland.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Business; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018328408770149622,"score_gpt":0.24385841106010853,"score_spread":0.2255300022899589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795275471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3055495,0.00016540749,0.0000011642029,0.0026475254,0.00022160418,0.00030774143,0.00012720822,0.0000048826964,0.69097495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753443,0.0005871789,0.00009997814,0.000026706339,0.00005572685,0.000005201509,3.370608e-7,0.000006433166,0.023874162],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849474,0.0001149501,0.00033656365,0.00011095892,0.00068044756,0.00026232365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988279,0.00021282409,0.00042688265,0.00021197031,0.0001259326,0.00019453671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031034308,0.000097344266,0.0002818751,0.000037794096,0.00018316998,0.000003894833,0.00037894375,0.00008412581,0.00016244697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005654487,0.000054652137,0.00011093345,0.00017581375,0.00051356904,0.00009284998,0.000054537744,0.000051978102,0.0000014764992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007921278,0.00013863367,0.69294757,0.00024053814,0.00021349013,0.0000038070493,0.039352335,0.000009055351,0.007948472,0.20284559,0.03027257,0.025948737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030678554,0.000041691455,0.22132331,0.0002005463,0.000030332822,1.5284957e-7,0.0016966653,3.6660455e-7,0.0015722626,0.0005023779,0.7742239,0.00010156573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69315416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8828728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7439514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035314975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038658275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30888912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795306509","doi":"","title":"The consolidated statutes for Upper Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.01685241843464094,"score_gpt":0.2559071244284409,"score_spread":0.23905470599379994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795306509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.089892685,0.0012736848,0.000006067242,0.06791441,0.0015673332,0.0015833414,0.0011791344,0.000063916996,0.8365194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8359636,0.0029293695,0.00026686816,0.0008988807,0.0005313884,0.00016989034,0.000011849606,0.00002886199,0.15919928],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984963,0.00008526399,0.0002463155,0.0001778204,0.00031165287,0.0006826448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813384,0.0008751358,0.00013535359,0.00016274677,0.00026546264,0.00042748055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003066123,0.00012828875,0.00018641967,0.00005423428,0.0012654306,0.000037707097,0.00035029577,0.000075467375,0.00010435715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011830528,0.000072413015,0.000067614026,0.00014718171,0.00051560265,0.000105482155,0.000021654336,0.00005491588,0.0000069081257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022262439,0.000006620468,0.011186863,0.000013144965,0.000119236705,0.000007958365,0.0052312072,3.3269927e-7,0.000035899797,0.24681644,0.7089152,0.027644875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019475303,0.000012480296,0.010123436,0.000017625143,0.00001548718,2.1995602e-7,0.0020302199,2.6021544e-7,0.000036865415,0.00074125093,0.9866857,0.00014168466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99784267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7460709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063902617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032271703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9732797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795335924","doi":"","title":"Canada. Constitutional Conference","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.01964436155194455,"score_gpt":0.24002852486757678,"score_spread":0.22038416331563224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795335924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05290103,0.0008898688,0.00001682821,0.04435031,0.0013128025,0.00042325893,0.0010081213,0.000056385114,0.8990414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873303,0.006429866,0.00020568217,0.0003525599,0.00022565969,0.00002095468,0.0000062126583,0.000005380877,0.0054233833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984541,0.00008400512,0.00024199593,0.00021262199,0.00046520395,0.0005420899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868226,0.000177443,0.00013070699,0.00013570416,0.00032785747,0.0005460316],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001820801,0.00014397375,0.00020987345,0.00037996378,0.00065190595,0.000022537513,0.00032337158,0.00010504223,0.000702472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049153285,0.00010229456,0.00008609949,0.0011018319,0.003533056,0.00017421208,0.000024818897,0.00006187853,0.000014364577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004930218,0.0000088182405,0.0687407,0.000007479338,0.000062858395,0.000016720413,0.0011549752,2.0539228e-7,0.00004255224,0.71255845,0.21364757,0.0037547506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014902382,0.000009957277,0.044757467,0.000031479693,0.00001327037,6.4893806e-7,0.0012215247,6.600325e-8,0.000018256897,0.0005523641,0.9530664,0.00017952839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99884903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9344293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030078102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004492601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99917877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795340831","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Constitution 1981","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.021334580804859494,"score_gpt":0.2577784316541927,"score_spread":0.23644385084933317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795340831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010817341,0.00041911384,0.0000012257427,0.024773225,0.00073043635,0.00038087988,0.00008786192,0.000030704778,0.9627592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9487371,0.0014826348,0.00006543542,0.00037819162,0.0003736922,0.00003396887,0.0000026927676,0.000008233244,0.048918072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983436,0.00012710568,0.00023757455,0.00018827771,0.00034776368,0.00075571315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832183,0.00025999622,0.00011607037,0.00019176138,0.00019856686,0.0009117537],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050987955,0.00013065634,0.00016193719,0.00015210382,0.0028218012,0.00006895514,0.0003824237,0.00013964814,0.00017971221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010238498,0.00007751092,0.000078526245,0.00024660045,0.0014056864,0.00017241242,0.000018588262,0.000095643045,0.00012210423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035683704,0.0000031246564,0.016612712,0.0000037334855,0.000039209703,0.00001816677,0.0039008623,4.312792e-7,0.000010127256,0.8891522,0.062214524,0.028041327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012035567,0.000009786377,0.022604574,0.000023177041,0.0000123643,7.7125674e-7,0.0007723409,1.7390647e-7,0.0000075868297,0.0013116756,0.97499496,0.00014225181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99873096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93791974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014148306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035164508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795694203","doi":"10.1017/cls.2017.31","title":"Perspective féministe sur l’article 1974.1 du Code civil du Québec. Une protection efficace dans la vie des femmes locataires victimes de violences?","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020052533324494432,"score_gpt":0.2655291746062412,"score_spread":0.24547664128174676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795694203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90643585,0.007907983,0.00017018015,0.069258146,0.0022694336,0.00037943912,0.000116961484,0.000028720286,0.013433297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99038774,0.00235055,0.0002199961,0.0010842149,0.003875275,0.000019756135,0.0000020111077,0.000045523993,0.002014959],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967955,0.0006034994,0.00059907144,0.00045562707,0.00024570542,0.0013006105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99550855,0.0006033076,0.0005368536,0.00018357765,0.0013362254,0.0018314949],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018040759,0.0004077878,0.0006640406,0.0000461475,0.0036641206,0.00033839166,0.00047332727,0.00045525873,0.00017780517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011116604,0.00041536466,0.0004963764,0.0005514659,0.008791745,0.00078053394,0.00005097168,0.00075333717,0.000010886012],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003004828,0.00007862778,0.0036516709,0.00015491436,0.0006306717,0.00018109525,0.8003063,0.00005748006,0.00020932894,0.18517642,0.0056564366,0.0038669938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012744791,0.0006784297,0.012114897,0.0009121709,0.0004982011,0.00046323508,0.70019585,0.00094272813,0.00024902174,0.008099449,0.27375585,0.000815701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9573779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2680994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007865607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004331796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796168702","doi":"10.29173/alr1332","title":"In a Poor State: The Long Road to Human Rights Protection on the Basis of Social Condition","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Human rights; Poverty; Denial; Prejudice (legal term); Social rights; State (computer science); Legislation; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; Social protection; Law; Social security; Economics; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.03949446910300471,"score_gpt":0.34214856818675843,"score_spread":0.30265409908375374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796168702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6018302,0.005081053,0.000004944641,0.17915678,0.00038117156,0.009119881,0.000009938642,0.000036373654,0.2043797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99486715,0.00039450545,0.000003876044,0.0025132238,0.00005739183,0.0003251424,0.000001362508,0.00000501133,0.0018323136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998187,0.0009026608,0.00025863716,0.00015269258,0.00029832358,0.00020066112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994332,0.00021200665,0.00013542736,0.00010674276,0.00008218253,0.00003042487],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009303635,0.00010318781,0.00022903288,0.000009758991,0.0014070388,0.000029677638,0.00017333555,0.00004086223,0.00049722014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004015294,0.000050505907,0.000099391866,0.00035110992,0.00024327972,0.000113470895,0.000018754581,0.00013188005,0.000103651015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052968317,0.000073189265,0.00009000391,0.00018616921,0.00004279654,8.1529964e-7,0.01567901,9.2182154e-7,0.00004462434,0.97553605,0.0067070187,0.0016340965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014213305,0.000053471504,0.0055003213,0.00074829423,0.00004776133,3.919495e-7,0.0004556676,3.4859886e-7,0.0005164168,0.0026880717,0.9896916,0.00015549915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14856733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33034247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9829846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001360457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014888414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796638899","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1301","title":"Issue 1: Caring Society v Canada: Neoliberalism, Social Reproduction, and Indigenous Child Welfare","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Neoliberalism (international relations); Reproduction; Welfare; Social reproduction; Politics; Political science; Tribunal; Social Welfare; Social work; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Child care; Political economy; Economic growth; Social science; Law; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.019510292626329025,"score_gpt":0.30204294208430077,"score_spread":0.28253264945797174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796638899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76601297,0.0006666216,0.0000012917754,0.21275938,0.0007064466,0.00015710387,0.00001620506,0.00002442073,0.019655593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730148,0.0002881921,0.000053548338,0.003334717,0.022688976,0.000001394412,8.581345e-7,0.000011593101,0.00060593634],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984844,0.00013463883,0.00032730636,0.00017490226,0.00047529084,0.0004034589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990319,0.00002193399,0.0003171008,0.00004566037,0.00044278745,0.0001406],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005064963,0.00014274001,0.00033500188,0.000025564827,0.0079044355,0.00013961761,0.00014150253,0.00015430611,0.000022948121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009605946,0.00012226758,0.00011994629,0.00016676931,0.0011268513,0.0002901841,0.00007870211,0.0002980934,8.2837175e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025528681,0.00003257714,0.0008043046,0.000035590525,0.00025471678,0.000006785098,0.8696224,3.0988957e-7,0.00002987569,0.106238514,0.017149676,0.0057997233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004467918,0.000057313217,0.035334714,0.000013948942,0.00006399754,0.000020522992,0.055204067,3.8614198e-7,0.000036537545,0.0009982688,0.9076062,0.00021725513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89362407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65348357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8904565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051409414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003951307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99338716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W279723183","doi":"","title":"An Acculturated Anglicanism: The Twenty-Three Churches of Trafalgar Region, Diocese of Niagara, Province of Ontario","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican and Episcopal history","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Census; Population; Privilege (computing); Gospel; History; Annals; Constitution; Refugee; Immigration; Law; Economic history; Geography; Genealogy; Political science; Sociology; Ancient history; Demography; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03509478075857134,"score_gpt":0.26261850157090355,"score_spread":0.22752372081233221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W279723183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.988383,0.0022133926,0.000010849335,0.00073260145,0.0001049509,0.00037011027,0.0000078045505,0.000028940372,0.008148371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979596,0.00018580971,0.0001899305,0.00008137089,0.00007289184,0.000014006317,0.0000037919292,0.0000086509845,0.001483917],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987126,0.00011824202,0.00034964885,0.00023614868,0.0003367402,0.00024662324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901646,0.0000600954,0.0003478559,0.0002264748,0.00023285569,0.000116251445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033152336,0.00015359715,0.00036870094,0.000035425404,0.00028223702,0.000007492088,0.00034904224,0.00009684928,0.000039554565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001075119,0.0001026996,0.00010265825,0.00015852146,0.0026621148,0.00021494109,0.00004355506,0.00015029199,0.0000011231461],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033367463,0.0008348702,0.040657286,0.00023168865,0.00027415808,0.000025943596,0.89722496,0.00006436506,0.010526454,0.03469229,0.0063032666,0.008831069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034647333,0.0020850787,0.6253714,0.0004652972,0.0004040305,0.000010475211,0.057372097,0.000010781657,0.009382828,0.002699034,0.29754627,0.0011880054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3308835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5238612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8398528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008385864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007291874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98086727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799374374","doi":"","title":"Creating an Indigenous Legal Community","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science","score_opus":0.044922907553408886,"score_gpt":0.3313954430756347,"score_spread":0.2864725355222258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799374374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9459259,0.0003085308,0.000011148934,0.0003622236,0.0000915872,0.00017417666,0.0000012416067,0.000087493514,0.05303768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98409975,0.00019368091,0.0005945582,0.00000516049,0.00047910993,5.088778e-7,0.0000041271333,0.0000074445884,0.014615655],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607486,0.0023913605,0.000111672525,0.00020669877,0.00074462686,0.0004707842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831164,0.0006136909,0.00009670562,0.00016848544,0.0005262106,0.00028325187],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002361374,0.00009656951,0.00019699603,0.00008900881,0.012432218,0.00015667555,0.00042945173,0.00014423973,0.00008091592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047453085,0.000108823035,0.000051543524,0.00030184738,0.0010997268,0.00070456945,0.00023337196,0.001351398,0.00001886494],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015078865,0.00035809437,0.093017116,0.000068412264,0.00011384609,0.00004301568,0.885432,0.00011380888,0.0049754595,0.001777201,0.00048985885,0.013460385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005617911,0.000719526,0.111879356,0.000071128525,0.000020212174,0.0000044318163,0.5149291,0.00014925945,0.00016161067,0.00007610027,0.37117615,0.00025133055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.121711776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013933939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3706863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035674585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016348028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98885345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799684005","doi":"","title":"CRA - Charitable organizations outside Canada that have received a gift from Her Majesty in right of Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02929591409849843,"score_gpt":0.23794858105657296,"score_spread":0.20865266695807452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799684005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76323545,0.00016667845,0.000012918876,0.005529301,0.00050163275,0.0003859765,0.000101885,0.000037415404,0.23002876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98482066,0.0000335436,0.00049732695,0.0003360114,0.000044697954,0.000010045871,0.000009371176,0.000008236881,0.014240085],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866825,0.000103287304,0.00021782874,0.00020235401,0.00043848806,0.0003697668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992932,0.00012167773,0.00009417862,0.00012546539,0.00023314895,0.00013231227],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012955915,0.000118359036,0.00022903236,0.000016171145,0.00043370476,0.000017707333,0.00025073864,0.00006770216,0.0052562295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034194143,0.00009190581,0.000018884857,0.00027877497,0.00013119585,0.0001626299,0.00006056714,0.0001035883,0.0000038786707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071249624,0.000058969363,0.8763129,0.0000071079785,0.00007959578,0.000026968808,0.06331036,0.000009339279,0.00009660453,0.002330863,0.05767705,0.0000830806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034285014,0.000008095197,0.86789477,0.000025584472,0.000022675898,1.4660331e-7,0.08098809,0.00002392945,0.002719284,0.0006221673,0.047028136,0.0003243008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99999076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22158526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008662069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002051899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799706380","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0040","title":"Social and Economic Rights","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Social rights; Vision; Cultural rights; Political science; Human rights; Fundamental rights; Legislature; International human rights law; Law; Supreme court; Sociology","score_opus":0.04999704133581945,"score_gpt":0.2701698302668932,"score_spread":0.22017278893107373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799706380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005071632,0.000070843686,0.000001133068,0.00026775768,0.00021209732,0.00029658258,0.00006704206,0.000082584505,0.9984948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008730812,0.00051873893,0.00003397595,0.000013393502,0.0005081646,4.9533554e-7,0.000005533675,0.000013008091,0.9901759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990678,0.00003854554,0.000097784556,0.00033915363,0.00018671078,0.0002700309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935454,0.000052053783,0.000246452,0.00016110114,0.000060644365,0.00012523247],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000106140236,0.00023240554,0.00033895002,0.000037238915,0.0038997903,0.00014070964,0.00046212462,0.0004269357,0.00006268363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006642682,0.00023980204,0.00015141991,8.369986e-7,0.0013081871,0.0001625551,0.00035778046,0.00025655527,0.0000043571526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018989998,0.0000017535758,0.000008863506,0.000011316496,0.00012426722,0.0000227559,0.0059577324,7.824042e-8,3.4808608e-7,0.9865943,0.005266569,0.001992998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025938646,0.000010867046,0.000080608566,0.000026780552,0.000115983225,3.517897e-7,0.00025417385,0.0000010057075,0.0000020120833,0.0035908627,0.99535376,0.0003041936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010291394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011693411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9900872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004311209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075784184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801803673","doi":"10.7939/r3g737b9g","title":"Reclaiming the Language of Law: The Contemporary Articulation and Application of Cree Legal Principles in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Alberta Library","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Articulation (sociology); Law; Political science; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01752137801074675,"score_gpt":0.21347071980343132,"score_spread":0.19594934179268458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801803673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9578358,0.0001691738,0.0000071398126,0.012683185,0.0000140856,0.00016021861,0.0000037236805,0.0000032163468,0.02912347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985969,0.00003429698,0.000046196263,0.000036368827,0.0000101868145,2.138733e-7,0.0000014185256,0.0000015481014,0.0012728847],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995732,0.00009655954,0.000087887725,0.00006378829,0.000117328134,0.00006126536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992815,0.00048788826,0.000118465505,0.00007706002,0.000017519254,0.000017556675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008478753,0.000034684323,0.000083516796,0.000009447138,0.0001678559,0.000003490313,0.00014891222,0.000021542226,0.000024326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003799211,0.000019367966,0.000018972503,0.00007262126,0.000382776,0.00033998216,0.00007546389,0.000028827653,2.4678613e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009325977,0.00003064131,0.4753174,0.000040546303,0.00006076549,0.0000022819022,0.14372833,0.000027093813,0.0017799145,0.37362272,0.000963244,0.004333808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056204386,0.000021450272,0.78289413,0.0001028402,0.000022955239,2.045553e-7,0.1179745,0.00016126939,0.002338541,0.00043677315,0.09536388,0.00012138829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97781956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95667094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37318596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038845814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015180286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14103541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801926483","doi":"10.7202/1043663ar","title":"La voix de l’enfant dans les procédures judiciaires qui le concernent : les rapports « voix de l’enfant » dans les affaires civiles au Nouveau-Brunswick*","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de l’Université de Moncton","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.01827724577484848,"score_gpt":0.25278554163552047,"score_spread":0.23450829586067198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801926483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9444258,0.008212111,0.0007869372,0.018684203,0.0005885295,0.00082311884,0.00016972641,0.00036681799,0.02594273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750421,0.008777863,0.0010735638,0.00017831339,0.0015872677,0.000036688394,0.000024402836,0.000100484336,0.013179291],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937138,0.0015198039,0.0006710226,0.0010972419,0.0007551439,0.0022430026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969566,0.00071320136,0.0006768476,0.0005089017,0.00033381436,0.0008106414],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013465129,0.00087720895,0.00094571995,0.00016286847,0.005073398,0.00019872095,0.0012368746,0.0010563661,0.0004068755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033965992,0.0008946054,0.00065605954,0.0006488691,0.004654141,0.00053166924,0.0007618,0.00082509016,0.000060223472],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021855946,0.00041653225,0.25073972,0.00046572406,0.00063868397,0.0009070741,0.6832799,0.00058757095,0.022112764,0.01404552,0.016556136,0.01003186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00103762,0.00036787151,0.28080532,0.0011249532,0.00072673755,0.00015460966,0.31336263,0.001378173,0.014522233,0.00044617272,0.3848103,0.0012633865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5569945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62256837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36991724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00811291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019949095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801944664","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190682910.003.0007","title":"Horizontal Effect and Caboose Constitutionalism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Charter; Legislature; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Normative; Power (physics); Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.019467830486887102,"score_gpt":0.2501811205019688,"score_spread":0.23071329001508167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801944664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015781528,0.00025874886,0.000011816509,0.00007987674,0.00044323798,0.00062948366,0.00013409977,0.00014126647,0.9967233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018351623,0.00050990283,0.00012026482,0.000030721934,0.00058522547,0.000001861152,0.000026810492,0.000012493465,0.99687755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985247,0.00022380691,0.000107652035,0.00038811506,0.00041452222,0.0003412035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990989,0.00025090328,0.00013994197,0.00014603403,0.00016535245,0.00019888737],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025417234,0.00027777292,0.0003746092,0.00005151477,0.0016838311,0.00008525743,0.00033956888,0.00045024668,0.000036210477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000070512186,0.00026765533,0.00014082788,0.000012958587,0.0029142292,0.0001408123,0.00035773666,0.00029865987,0.0000029102512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070980626,0.000007145819,0.000041552936,0.000062965824,0.00021659474,0.00007599941,0.005259333,8.616815e-8,0.0000043930136,0.92635983,0.064960934,0.0029401723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004587356,0.00007721153,0.000046602418,0.00009281108,0.00018173305,0.0000020653586,0.00047169908,8.494551e-7,0.0000117818845,0.00028564117,0.9980505,0.00032035913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026890321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014084391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93308955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007192942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030867697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802155858","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190682910.003.0006","title":"Canada’s Constitution and Courts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitutionalism; Charter; Law; Constitution; Political science; Jurisdiction; Federalism; Autonomy; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Judicial independence; Original jurisdiction; Fundamental rights; Constitutional law; Human rights; Democracy; Politics; History","score_opus":0.024884347898510663,"score_gpt":0.23212871540846006,"score_spread":0.2072443675099494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802155858","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016128739,0.00012142797,0.000008440747,0.00025408156,0.00037431574,0.00034096537,0.00012966781,0.00006161589,0.9985482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019973721,0.00049436797,0.000060483264,0.00008395205,0.00030536848,4.796041e-7,0.000014696906,0.000006264364,0.997037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888235,0.000091849615,0.00008928617,0.00027478128,0.00037967422,0.0002820397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929225,0.00008969596,0.00013335298,0.000116280644,0.00019938721,0.0001690062],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000122022284,0.00018319808,0.00024153838,0.000026853539,0.0014644427,0.000051451345,0.0002505331,0.00026789,0.000028258286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041926734,0.00019114706,0.0000501398,0.0000066280154,0.0015090187,0.00008700929,0.00020770995,0.00019816199,4.6249136e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015016167,0.000002591732,0.0000142381205,0.000026074775,0.00008497382,0.00004183497,0.0022096175,2.5064543e-7,5.6009355e-7,0.6319725,0.36485267,0.00077968166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018260464,0.000012108329,0.000048629172,0.00006121829,0.000097341566,7.3928135e-7,0.00072764355,0.0000014465724,0.0000032344985,0.00015318408,0.9984746,0.00023726016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7583161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8762219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63362193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014342879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025839224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802346026","doi":"","title":"Developments in Constitutional Law: The 2005-2006 Term","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Globe; Law; Political science; Terrorism; Human rights; Constitutional law; Scope (computer science); Broadcasting (networking); Criminal code; Criminal law; Computer security","score_opus":0.015449413388668324,"score_gpt":0.29447328047537497,"score_spread":0.2790238670867066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802346026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52176934,0.019500203,0.000484245,0.08701273,0.0012017254,0.0009541587,0.000009700727,0.00013299823,0.3689349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99054205,0.0030679097,0.00012232445,0.0005063424,0.0006620495,0.000009564223,0.0000011223717,0.0000040773784,0.0050845733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971085,0.00016531088,0.00023668293,0.00012396328,0.00045303276,0.0019125054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996369,0.000076919554,0.00009223392,0.000050888448,0.00007283782,0.00007024469],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021193814,0.000107524924,0.000118179705,0.000029916648,0.0016724567,0.000093182854,0.00033151804,0.00006718257,0.000073010335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000109030516,0.0000693643,0.00006397364,0.0001400593,0.00084280124,0.00031116785,0.00003938444,0.0010829048,0.00011266598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007698985,0.000035693156,0.01044306,5.0189476e-7,0.00005048826,0.0000015513137,0.0037705295,0.000027778413,0.000015123531,0.9772101,0.0004265998,0.008010853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009005822,0.000024686382,0.023463223,0.000027698316,0.000018710776,0.00006213699,0.015524625,0.000004600989,0.000023731613,0.04133164,0.9183357,0.0002827058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017868014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16726385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93587846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003322827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022961742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802650726","doi":"","title":"Developments in Constitutional Law: The 1986-87 Term","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Constitutional law; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Physics","score_opus":0.014336788153378353,"score_gpt":0.2973007552557321,"score_spread":0.2829639671023537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802650726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89323896,0.0010023813,0.00007369806,0.011318188,0.0012254989,0.00029987463,0.000002076326,0.000040171744,0.092799164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964813,0.00089707575,0.00008991001,0.00025369864,0.00046321988,0.000009927714,9.629359e-7,0.00000390244,0.0018000155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756885,0.00012643554,0.00020353842,0.00012366881,0.00042883123,0.0015486627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995962,0.00010041382,0.000089910376,0.000060797945,0.00009549526,0.0000571913],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002221314,0.000101912454,0.000112475296,0.000026560348,0.0018678589,0.00010525516,0.00038701302,0.000085402775,0.000067975765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023554791,0.00006382105,0.00006224263,0.00015745718,0.001215359,0.00023374811,0.000047559734,0.002080763,0.000064263964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005629409,0.00002282395,0.016927782,4.964918e-7,0.000037332924,0.0000020207874,0.0036879822,0.000001234031,0.00021085651,0.9758314,0.00007472974,0.003197741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015520717,0.000060454207,0.100146614,0.00003609446,0.000034786342,0.00017067889,0.03350843,0.000003457178,0.000116219475,0.37535736,0.48846307,0.0005507691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002614095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17601965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.600474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097094476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023463017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802889441","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0110","title":"Honour in sovereignty: Can Crown consultation with Indigenous peoples erase Canada’s sovereignty deficit?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Law; Honour; Duty; Politics; Supreme court; Political science; Constitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.010372781011870804,"score_gpt":0.22271116260188928,"score_spread":0.21233838159001847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802889441","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8753838,0.000316444,0.000027410057,0.0005120767,0.00015190965,0.00019692286,0.000044959634,0.000015890157,0.123350605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99840176,0.00028755123,0.00058938976,0.00007691149,0.00013965141,1.09181485e-7,0.0000028429329,0.000005235476,0.0004965393],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986734,0.00016571136,0.00014678643,0.00015217785,0.00049616105,0.00036578465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890286,0.00012758812,0.00023723408,0.00007351701,0.00047444878,0.00018438137],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002535942,0.00012152052,0.00022223745,0.000016892222,0.0022494874,0.000050154304,0.0002748374,0.0000772887,0.0010105706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000987762,0.00011237811,0.000046703837,0.00006525826,0.0006170838,0.00045475285,0.000043680764,0.00015372624,0.0000023817274],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009913347,0.00025601475,0.0715934,0.000043031516,0.00039051537,0.00036940508,0.78993475,0.00012911233,0.00008590099,0.12848239,0.003492028,0.004232092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00275139,0.00029884034,0.117188655,0.00013755329,0.000092913026,0.000020733565,0.84605163,0.000012855885,0.00008040398,0.00050266925,0.0324044,0.00045795008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12797973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026639767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001633583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804237024","doi":"10.29173/alr1341","title":"The Judicial Resolution of Church Property Disputes: Canadian and American Models","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Deference; Scope (computer science); Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Law; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Resolution (logic); Settlor; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.03830581873405498,"score_gpt":0.30450888060468106,"score_spread":0.2662030618706261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804237024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008785488,0.16939935,0.0000056421377,0.06875289,0.00024061931,0.0020037622,0.000007838188,0.00002220412,0.7507822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8393294,0.15637839,0.00009538162,0.0014869536,0.00005362771,0.000058921294,0.0000016537749,0.000007555511,0.0025880612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987482,0.0003663397,0.00020873372,0.00015174634,0.00021486037,0.00031013455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925095,0.0002584096,0.000103849525,0.00013041728,0.00010657722,0.00014982413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062448194,0.00009122845,0.00025210346,0.000006230795,0.0011922107,0.000029938632,0.00015313906,0.00002992944,0.000027629572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000819838,0.000044964498,0.000057330268,0.00023948758,0.0010773445,0.000122511,0.00002106773,0.000080090336,0.00000968119],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002235681,0.000012889723,0.0006029483,0.00015380993,0.000044635282,5.022455e-7,0.00516067,0.0000017129565,0.0000033108263,0.96634626,0.008548618,0.019122431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039269195,0.000016740336,0.00040909913,0.0003019498,0.000037324728,4.3650067e-7,0.0005238074,0.000013647153,0.0000013719514,0.00059966487,0.99796844,0.00008823015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.959694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9717924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9894198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121494675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013826165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9169641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804671287","doi":"10.1017/cls.2018.5","title":"Economic Development through Treaty Reparations in New Zealand and Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Treaty of Waitangi; Treaty; Settlement (finance); Indigenous; Confiscation; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Politics; Geography; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.02233505969513448,"score_gpt":0.27765709831178303,"score_spread":0.25532203861664854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804671287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97266555,0.0005992453,0.0000042654956,0.011243228,0.00051671703,0.00015599735,0.000027403974,0.0000048122115,0.014782772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990139,0.0004190218,0.00076114346,0.001885755,0.0005392577,0.0000029948305,0.000004133157,0.0000116825795,0.006236987],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986867,0.00007414988,0.0003862605,0.00019973215,0.0000827754,0.00057040487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984176,0.00013064126,0.00018355933,0.00008006627,0.0001419057,0.0010461881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005394326,0.00014971368,0.0003340658,0.000023858609,0.0011665059,0.00011529859,0.00015916131,0.00012772589,0.000090274814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010567474,0.00015227482,0.00007640989,0.00008210683,0.0006016124,0.00032993022,0.000016373882,0.00022869429,0.0000011536924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008480512,0.00000786967,0.02435425,0.000022455093,0.00023192627,0.00007534811,0.729448,0.000012476674,0.00000681825,0.18827409,0.055201054,0.0023572426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006350428,0.000050422837,0.024048047,0.000076365555,0.000033189146,0.00003348637,0.050937254,0.000007767471,0.000010180639,0.0026468292,0.92124856,0.00027287425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9972275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8660475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034544573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00843258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W280710510","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4560","title":"Equality Kapped; Media Unleashed","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Media coverage; Humanities; Sociology; Law; Media studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08740563674334273,"score_gpt":0.39071923331713176,"score_spread":0.30331359657378903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W280710510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6271602,0.0005215509,0.00024852453,0.02522423,0.001120906,0.0011159437,0.000032775264,0.0003177918,0.34425807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994993,0.00007264304,0.00094065594,0.0014822127,0.00083886884,0.000011143757,0.0000028126954,0.000009803954,0.0016488667],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978971,0.00018985313,0.00035070526,0.0003106883,0.00077460054,0.0004770607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986887,0.00034977807,0.00015932867,0.00023571197,0.000295058,0.0002714231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007004578,0.00016784646,0.0003323353,0.00006666989,0.00043508067,0.000137811,0.000832384,0.00013093348,0.0004209644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019290574,0.00014757799,0.000101057376,0.0004693464,0.00025501862,0.00051487866,0.00014978633,0.00016857966,0.00018981806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008775167,0.0016119753,0.033389077,0.00067274773,0.00046061253,0.000057824444,0.46660188,0.00068864896,0.010554375,0.23567362,0.1334962,0.11591553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010988722,0.00020646636,0.75706446,0.00021680296,0.00048256622,6.2542784e-7,0.02352753,0.000029896451,0.0023528384,0.0033453484,0.2106939,0.0009807198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035239724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011661765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7236754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014371885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000099155965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60180557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807714046","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Conflict and the Development of Canadian Aboriginal Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ResearchOnline - ND (The University of Notre Dame Australia)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.14087709927964806,"score_gpt":0.39163663977465196,"score_spread":0.25075954049500393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807714046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89870304,0.00011080373,0.00001269797,0.054168172,0.00010322136,0.0005575468,0.0001820705,0.000011769734,0.046150696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934563,0.00026769625,0.0009894507,0.000023152978,0.0000538956,3.7803238e-7,0.000007845505,0.0000014002769,0.0051998533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988426,0.000157782,0.000112490095,0.00013049525,0.0004706433,0.00028599947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990187,0.00022001569,0.00012063154,0.00019018128,0.00028127676,0.0001691424],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008666456,0.00007458092,0.00016593943,0.000038433092,0.004393965,0.000052523006,0.0006853312,0.00006230301,0.00026388667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021614318,0.00005011105,0.000056241177,0.00011151777,0.014573767,0.00016088613,0.00011261863,0.000197686,0.000019077585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028187266,0.000073237636,0.02202797,0.000053223877,0.00037521872,0.0000288889,0.09073928,0.000018355799,0.00019517956,0.872572,0.010758131,0.0028766384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007680651,0.0000105663385,0.07199765,0.000031032832,0.000022250428,5.4499964e-7,0.010727862,0.000012463405,0.00005247765,0.00009546018,0.9162078,0.00007383964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7166288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.772484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9054496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014126062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005639527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99690217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808418278","doi":"","title":"The Constitution of Canada: History, Evolution, Influence and Reform","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.0225631248589037,"score_gpt":0.2728567715367771,"score_spread":0.2502936466778734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808418278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40067333,0.0014266573,0.000008023903,0.014008197,0.00045758055,0.00016084209,0.0000019712634,0.000016945336,0.58324647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935528,0.00014824212,0.000027310694,0.000036857044,0.000031265787,0.0000033843496,6.265434e-8,5.4947986e-7,0.006199503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952495,0.000021666661,0.00008034702,0.000060400496,0.00019128088,0.00012137631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995546,0.000041447012,0.00009925576,0.00010402176,0.00016098733,0.00003971777],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026375471,0.000034175762,0.00005607137,0.0000026991293,0.0030541266,0.000024716057,0.00016667269,0.000023201317,0.00001273334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079066993,0.000019186047,0.000010223128,0.000010543602,0.0018574955,0.00017530068,0.00004826154,0.000034903493,8.2286573e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035805388,0.0000028024078,0.027280651,0.0000038604417,0.000012351699,3.9824798e-7,0.0032009082,0.0000010052927,0.00006882583,0.957596,0.011106145,0.0007234623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000629945,0.000004158038,0.5103485,0.0000065098848,0.000004314889,1.5633202e-7,0.005719389,0.0000046838118,0.00002219473,0.00054287945,0.483238,0.000046222918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9880484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.991569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9570531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016993865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058211345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99824375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809141803","doi":"10.1177/0706743718784939","title":"Canada Should Retain Its Reservation on the United Nation’s Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"NOSM University; Western University; McMaster University; University of Toronto; Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre; University of Ottawa","funders":"Government of Canada; Australian Government","keywords":"Reservation; Convention; Political science; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Law","score_opus":0.08374380496929197,"score_gpt":0.2991643480561549,"score_spread":0.21542054308686293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809141803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6152805,0.000057446046,8.925384e-7,0.37476835,0.00054483867,0.00018979391,0.000023699828,0.0000022893648,0.009132179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952243,0.000004787091,0.00002130827,0.001992052,0.00061550445,0.0000042786305,0.0000013093365,0.0000053367366,0.002131097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835324,0.00052527373,0.00022279969,0.000073541276,0.0006099499,0.00021519107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983319,0.0005180182,0.00029799563,0.00014666225,0.0005822159,0.00012319314],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012410976,0.00009227484,0.00010845098,0.00005244682,0.0028023918,0.00006815839,0.0004354387,0.000047788213,0.00025794815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007110684,0.000037295835,0.00005945079,0.00039131506,0.00085980946,0.00009160479,0.000005678682,0.00029776664,0.0000033933654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004759415,0.000012285837,0.014434909,0.000005560637,0.000106819105,7.0480297e-7,0.026868222,0.00004086134,0.0000023521704,0.8002218,0.15823878,0.000020083186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074766116,0.0009602957,0.13103028,0.0006595431,0.00020725165,0.00000785268,0.35773343,0.00015880066,0.00019454527,0.04965176,0.45823422,0.00041435752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96953505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75057006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006388785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024184245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811405627","doi":"10.21991/cf29362","title":"Wahkohtowin in Action","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Metis; Law; Commission; Work (physics); Political science; Action (physics); Sociology; Law reform; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.05231313615420984,"score_gpt":0.34114393953631045,"score_spread":0.2888308033821006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811405627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16640788,0.0012079052,0.022953475,0.05419104,0.009978359,0.0021032789,0.000167818,0.00085811905,0.7421321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954263,0.00014775783,0.0008902718,0.0010290735,0.0007434049,0.000093924544,0.000031866843,0.000007378884,0.001630003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971433,0.00016842702,0.0005044528,0.00051237305,0.0006811848,0.0009902532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872607,0.00018606,0.00014457901,0.00021283784,0.00048775575,0.000242672],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061704166,0.00027945152,0.00031554277,0.00021287285,0.0035487444,0.00013379061,0.00036492303,0.00027765933,0.0008563847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011610793,0.00026590333,0.00017141848,0.0007405387,0.0146710705,0.0011124349,0.00015073727,0.00031458086,0.0010381879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000413474,0.00008811272,0.037928794,0.000005985596,0.000033516393,0.00001159656,0.0011110094,0.000046001493,0.00018845679,0.95170003,0.0066827736,0.0021623473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014022886,0.00006571245,0.009237269,0.00014292586,0.000030343002,0.000028374458,0.018838882,0.00017086795,0.00038559028,0.019410271,0.94967055,0.00061690557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037448744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021651933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9429878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010125276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011578377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811429659","doi":"10.7202/1045932ar","title":"LE PARTAGE DES RESPONSABILITÉS PARENTALES APRÈS UNE RUPTURE : RÔLE ET LIMITES DU DROIT","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05376253290635385,"score_gpt":0.29789843498446633,"score_spread":0.24413590207811248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811429659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87154406,0.008987243,0.00006536116,0.09898824,0.0028782024,0.00064497656,0.00011191142,0.00019336973,0.016586654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724945,0.0030126437,0.0014390466,0.00056796847,0.0041515017,0.00006638334,0.0000295432,0.00004888637,0.018189548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620223,0.0009734377,0.0005842025,0.00076789554,0.0004762778,0.0009959564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99733615,0.0012123057,0.00027133938,0.00043534744,0.00042001373,0.0003248607],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012624519,0.00047031985,0.0006600083,0.000047479545,0.002630009,0.0002608473,0.0006256378,0.0004653764,0.00071356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025524234,0.0004513877,0.00037823519,0.0008870888,0.0043361518,0.00080738665,0.00035934334,0.000442258,0.0010039215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002425759,0.0010431635,0.14955479,0.00043861524,0.0004343956,0.0000787812,0.3410414,0.000057177087,0.0012853266,0.47513875,0.017833447,0.012851566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072764256,0.00032796606,0.11303602,0.00045650837,0.00019432044,0.000017876675,0.03459266,0.00021944041,0.00039836238,0.008915587,0.8402965,0.0008170841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042137682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.104457706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8224631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063949375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023302337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W283588073","doi":"10.3138/jcs.36.3.61","title":"Do Parents have Fundamental Rights?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fundamental rights; Ratification; Right to property; International human rights law; Law; Political science; Linguistic rights; Human rights; Convention; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.08452923904449697,"score_gpt":0.3621077330811215,"score_spread":0.2775784940366245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W283588073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8910226,0.0138918655,7.749849e-7,0.016076352,0.0015647211,0.00016983943,0.000010979401,0.0000137684965,0.0772491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903974,0.005447814,0.00011610093,0.0003128888,0.0008794703,0.000003033353,2.844852e-7,0.000005663237,0.0028373417],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983969,0.00011790607,0.00034665334,0.00010776272,0.0005564299,0.00047438568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858755,0.00011571403,0.00023837927,0.00006348989,0.0005303872,0.00046446666],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005157471,0.00013178473,0.000336946,0.00026655977,0.0015152078,0.00009619515,0.00024319546,0.000060006645,0.00017798907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037134814,0.00009307405,0.00014938477,0.00034185493,0.000443881,0.0003107133,0.000032028063,0.00018658783,0.000037019596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065159096,0.00009638357,0.40919018,0.000019490557,0.0021778496,0.0010963312,0.25948876,0.000022118935,0.000025966294,0.007969497,0.30791327,0.011935016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029194853,0.00005452377,0.02883178,0.000052975043,0.0000505435,0.000016081214,0.13108578,2.7456605e-7,0.0000055269134,0.00089787185,0.83858263,0.0001300717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31080058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.883724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5729234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001147039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021135475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W283933355","doi":"","title":"Timely Interventions: MacKinnon's Contribution to Canadian Equality Jurisprudence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Psychological intervention; Political science; Sociology; Law; Criminology; Psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.047347919633634696,"score_gpt":0.3881111537471724,"score_spread":0.3407632341135377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W283933355","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7233051,0.00013603177,0.0009812661,0.11274693,0.0023400546,0.001429949,0.000085770174,0.00033419149,0.1586407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990252,0.00001100962,0.0007981855,0.0010340385,0.00022719649,0.000041427487,0.000006812059,0.0000038986336,0.0076254243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874306,0.00012533893,0.00019764311,0.00020255381,0.0002851387,0.00044628727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988742,0.00008278122,0.0000468676,0.00012660757,0.00043269742,0.000436836],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010233764,0.00009014157,0.0001302156,0.00004805777,0.0010797263,0.00014203574,0.00028029832,0.00011018017,0.0024639843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017008304,0.000075911645,0.00010676089,0.00029391836,0.00020023264,0.00022343591,0.00005790528,0.00019531054,0.0009865169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009665093,0.00007099806,0.019491158,0.000014689533,0.00005248266,0.000005320528,0.012815071,0.0000017940475,0.001476287,0.912646,0.043175373,0.010241175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001426793,0.00002505654,0.08735486,0.000025237552,0.000014001704,3.409123e-7,0.002237395,0.0000063266307,0.00033904563,0.0014405814,0.9081865,0.00022797943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8032807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9832394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9112054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038679657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017877517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W285968304","doi":"","title":"Newfoundland (Treasury Board) v. N.A.P.E.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Doctrine; Treasury; Equity (law)","score_opus":0.023595942905606754,"score_gpt":0.25081334481509093,"score_spread":0.22721740190948417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W285968304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10301905,0.00000809776,0.00007107436,0.0011503757,0.0002920867,0.00045559948,0.000014064266,0.00036863878,0.894621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96617764,0.029915268,0.0006741622,0.00011516404,0.00068246404,0.000003456413,0.000015564847,0.000022782651,0.0023934862],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814975,0.00026392305,0.00014950626,0.00038562392,0.00046917802,0.0005819965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925625,0.00013524479,0.00011040134,0.00019330053,0.00019709258,0.00010768127],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022777598,0.00021731696,0.00024830404,0.001912523,0.0013167625,0.00012263123,0.00042007907,0.00016353838,0.00011284095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010307606,0.00021095318,0.00017187632,0.004851504,0.00041261018,0.00056620035,0.00014694838,0.00019898618,0.00012148072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069146755,0.0023762193,0.34778926,0.00019990094,0.00096660166,0.001484481,0.22484384,0.0001610575,0.00011958772,0.27599558,0.059216242,0.08615574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060411304,0.00002966819,0.008143517,0.000016341588,0.0000555332,9.0401426e-7,0.00424764,0.0000074885634,0.000016112548,0.000007004601,0.9865732,0.00029846706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89330524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7290866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92735696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008244047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003171809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W286193075","doi":"","title":"What is Marriage-Like Like? The Irrelevance of Conjugality","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Relevance (law); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Focus (optics); Positive economics; Family law; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.028166549375670816,"score_gpt":0.30480151512857484,"score_spread":0.276634965752904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W286193075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8389612,0.014532866,0.000024032151,0.048312847,0.0047693434,0.0013284126,0.000039025253,0.00027530896,0.091756955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743157,0.0051762657,0.00018394575,0.0044943765,0.00054814294,0.000044350596,0.0000028288,0.0000149009375,0.015219473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997585,0.0003907859,0.00036597642,0.0003577327,0.00076470897,0.000535827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851763,0.00037937786,0.00020939337,0.00041761537,0.00027897683,0.0001970019],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009808384,0.00020214691,0.0003389884,0.000013165712,0.0013449676,0.00028296947,0.0006547558,0.00014862965,0.001471602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029900268,0.00013753299,0.00018984803,0.00036654793,0.0012236655,0.0009669999,0.00016238196,0.00032022365,0.00043126853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037114,0.0007428321,0.14988221,0.0002342932,0.0011648652,0.00007873024,0.18777935,0.00006341839,0.0021016044,0.37061498,0.2644518,0.022514762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003566808,0.00002929218,0.01746692,0.00007099424,0.000037373873,0.0000011576918,0.017715264,0.0000063923853,0.00023153117,0.0029998377,0.9608378,0.00024679097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02982993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025527103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.696386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001855844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006995143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2876040202","doi":"10.1007/s10991-018-9212-3","title":"‘First Among Equals’: Breaking the Deadlock in Parental and Sibling Funeral Disputes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Liverpool Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Executor; Kinship; Deadlock; Statutory law; Sibling; Law; Common law; Genealogy; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.04032180553158114,"score_gpt":0.329332233732953,"score_spread":0.28901042820137185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2876040202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70297396,0.23803599,0.000014473998,0.013008458,0.0006247351,0.002197236,0.00001204239,0.00016524587,0.04296788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9569127,0.04124731,0.000116109586,0.0011137243,0.00038748074,0.00004548393,0.0000016920591,0.000007725281,0.0001677815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849707,0.00029102992,0.0002770633,0.00025293243,0.00030543868,0.00037644396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992669,0.0003233105,0.00012294919,0.00012986157,0.000073279996,0.00008367857],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008018217,0.00015204244,0.0003073683,0.000013234642,0.0014448164,0.00012851066,0.00027196886,0.000058583144,0.00013113675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029286562,0.00009332915,0.000081834376,0.00032481254,0.0011077013,0.00033564924,0.00019202399,0.00015738206,0.00005654487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017356537,0.00013288143,0.4224653,0.0019655146,0.00016911254,0.000027392569,0.07205219,0.0000042524257,0.000020568807,0.4672063,0.004728323,0.031210804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003485935,0.000065895605,0.20486087,0.0073911217,0.00014133258,0.0000033887206,0.0038791597,0.000118707176,0.000010136516,0.00086318096,0.7817835,0.00053410645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042356476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09858936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7770552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105896084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015795022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883005110","doi":"10.25071/ryr.v2i0.40379","title":"The Youth and Law Project","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue YOUR Review (York Online Undergraduate Research)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Law; Government (linguistics); Relevance (law); Political science; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Voting; Psychology; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.3430553272672741,"score_gpt":0.46716867815311297,"score_spread":0.12411335088583886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883005110","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004796418,0.53617924,0.0000058035557,0.407284,0.00036513293,0.0034489045,0.00007354387,0.00023054832,0.047616433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2143598,0.7698465,0.00057774613,0.0007252365,0.0011700502,0.000096635675,0.000049135346,0.00004916688,0.013125727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945435,0.0023032776,0.0004566834,0.0004489441,0.0012863016,0.0009612946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975282,0.00067385443,0.00015852609,0.00041695655,0.0007978517,0.0004246052],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069857845,0.00022678528,0.00047090484,0.000047917183,0.0027438323,0.00034125304,0.0007017049,0.000101998776,0.000005188423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045262217,0.0001379286,0.00014808822,0.0010262376,0.0017104279,0.0002192379,0.00042716265,0.0007193938,0.00012240015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007418968,0.000398026,0.00095921697,0.0025089323,0.00033517356,0.00005771727,0.052385036,0.0000026507284,0.000007504372,0.61752063,0.19001241,0.13573852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024641756,0.00008483774,0.00007450964,0.0015702398,0.000051349274,0.000005813885,0.019290596,0.000014822513,0.0000010502326,0.008322131,0.97012776,0.00021044795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016918816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0123239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78011537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042583988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036597069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99855447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885119136","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.2.01","title":"<i>Reference re: Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Appeal; Supreme court; Section (typography); Context (archaeology); Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Political science; High Court; Sociology; Constitutional court; Common law; Constitution; Epistemology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0358771769568436,"score_gpt":0.2644654530922324,"score_spread":0.2285882761353888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885119136","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9127786,0.0016448756,0.0000036492345,0.01058005,0.0003619164,0.00020041296,0.00007961075,0.000008055334,0.07434279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898846,0.00075791724,0.00012167904,0.0028301366,0.00044860493,0.0000048504626,8.534824e-7,0.000008657258,0.0059426986],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865794,0.00020141139,0.00032918208,0.00012620617,0.00019951678,0.0004857441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985748,0.00017789924,0.0002838518,0.00010371656,0.00034643649,0.0005133257],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016538484,0.00008291075,0.00037978083,0.000009228981,0.0010123171,0.0003230175,0.00035651494,0.000097815275,0.0002545624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013384123,0.00008547496,0.0001327392,0.00015901963,0.0032064593,0.0002616562,0.00003385226,0.00025791037,0.000004357287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074686286,0.000052869746,0.013359367,0.00012624475,0.0005984361,0.0000678271,0.4846381,0.0000022277063,0.000048785485,0.35806778,0.13608809,0.006875608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001932393,0.00021921431,0.006884074,0.00025200157,0.000056419707,0.00006661807,0.065625355,0.000006147432,0.000012688762,0.055995706,0.8686605,0.00028889062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68145674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97643226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7325724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035633708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034752532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W288602332","doi":"","title":"We too have Common sense: The Waterloo Declaration and Full communion in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Law; Sociology; Meaning (existential); Theology; Religious studies; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.054481185504400204,"score_gpt":0.3195296113158023,"score_spread":0.2650484258114021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W288602332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6554948,0.13621716,0.0000022142544,0.1962889,0.000048594982,0.00082399865,0.000004626045,0.000031626965,0.01108808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8404848,0.15195258,0.00006310263,0.0069529926,0.00006238862,0.000035525398,0.000003855343,0.0000027294793,0.00044204903],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981082,0.0009990941,0.0002499842,0.00014502264,0.00023034042,0.0002673519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914247,0.00050420716,0.000086375505,0.00015216865,0.00004183073,0.000072921466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000908442,0.000112300564,0.00029086063,0.0000062170598,0.00049105706,0.00002758561,0.00020596587,0.000052580042,0.00019947681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003777996,0.000056568148,0.000042857337,0.00012508841,0.00037138994,0.000082070495,0.000115263836,0.00022066293,0.00000994211],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048637117,0.00014080285,0.04597322,0.00035863015,0.0000750935,0.000052567168,0.046601426,0.000016933554,0.00008915271,0.12083208,0.04308899,0.74272245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014797284,0.000042606895,0.032377567,0.00036680064,0.00002925452,0.000005772212,0.007861202,0.000045408648,0.00001034326,0.001005264,0.95791227,0.00019556667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7587625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91482323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032081408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006902729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37768635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886839932","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.2.03","title":"<i>R v Kapp</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Supreme court; Charter; Affirmative action; Law; Deference; Government (linguistics); Political science; Respondent; Disadvantaged; Equal Protection Clause; Section (typography); Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.03053588415474346,"score_gpt":0.27633408401553355,"score_spread":0.2457981998607901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886839932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82719094,0.0013995137,0.00000978667,0.06221163,0.0008221168,0.00017700698,0.000009449602,0.000009607691,0.10816994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903029,0.00019190664,0.00005578109,0.0030750637,0.0010691481,0.0000042093434,2.608274e-7,0.000007637938,0.005293098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988328,0.00020615585,0.00022178877,0.000091696,0.00014827975,0.00049924763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987158,0.00017630543,0.00016324552,0.00008781141,0.00020890227,0.0006479283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016713835,0.0000947719,0.00026068153,0.00003942807,0.0011545885,0.00018801613,0.0003163306,0.000060848353,0.00017916076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034023265,0.00006326647,0.00008174429,0.00014585895,0.0019491873,0.000212896,0.000021309608,0.00020705153,0.000029866818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037138252,0.0000059620083,0.0016497808,0.0000082519955,0.00010559644,0.000033047803,0.31343707,0.0000010002448,0.0000074886234,0.6777833,0.005249837,0.001681524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010033546,0.000099882265,0.0022617748,0.000051699815,0.000026437994,0.000039016202,0.038964774,0.0000032580654,0.000013420727,0.06553229,0.8918479,0.00015617826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052330866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38951913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88659805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004879599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039010527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95397973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887193794","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.2.05","title":"<i>Alberta v Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Supreme court; Law; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); High Court; Political science; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.0246152067378612,"score_gpt":0.27130976404522505,"score_spread":0.24669455730736387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887193794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8868187,0.0006104276,0.0000032155733,0.03869727,0.0005595295,0.00017728283,0.000015031344,0.000003866872,0.073114686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99158585,0.00011231881,0.000051759467,0.0015904751,0.0005973857,0.0000042225115,5.726779e-7,0.000008867522,0.006048543],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871886,0.00024418812,0.00031112117,0.00010343991,0.00015818489,0.00046423002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985757,0.0002709665,0.00029404243,0.00010847068,0.00022967524,0.0005211305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013925008,0.00010947734,0.00037216282,0.000045791036,0.0006924836,0.000109409244,0.00036097565,0.0000814593,0.00019784743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035288156,0.00007700632,0.00009457755,0.00015992943,0.002146338,0.00020548007,0.00002746871,0.00018162112,0.000008618719],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013873322,0.000016702454,0.005951385,0.000033473047,0.0002473626,0.000025429716,0.56209755,0.000001564512,0.000058731257,0.42183775,0.007828821,0.0017625305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022584791,0.00038090485,0.007012027,0.00019601142,0.00007583515,0.000055628992,0.04356992,0.000007376455,0.00009810799,0.04449953,0.9015449,0.00030127502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22566125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7690962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8937161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035660705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035113524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7908272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887699530","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198785521.013.35","title":"English Law and its Expansion","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; English law; Political science; Comparative law; Prerogative; Parliament; Civil law (Civil law); Scots law; Public law; Adjudication; Israeli law; Municipal law; Sources of law; Chinese law; Politics","score_opus":0.029983872416618002,"score_gpt":0.24615296012753243,"score_spread":0.21616908771091442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887699530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00060465804,0.00026239958,0.0000019270456,0.00004884542,0.00043928286,0.0004637681,0.0000579416,0.00019555562,0.99792564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019409388,0.0010871225,0.00006347982,0.00009348737,0.0007572848,0.0000010688285,0.000012788759,0.00001759949,0.9960262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857455,0.00015206129,0.000111180125,0.00040060037,0.00040532002,0.0003562748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998974,0.00012810435,0.00014656989,0.00015714031,0.00040136717,0.00019279795],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018518927,0.0002476117,0.000316914,0.000037482714,0.0016320033,0.00008857242,0.00040075972,0.00048527762,0.00004114442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006630492,0.00025164525,0.0001099448,0.000012996696,0.0009278909,0.0002096952,0.00047135694,0.0002910423,0.0000022775291],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003105924,0.000007935897,0.0000022345714,0.000054170967,0.00009311786,0.000023061228,0.03148717,1.2741144e-7,0.0000036603813,0.92722714,0.040266044,0.00080426637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026534582,0.000033804878,0.0000091613065,0.000099468656,0.00010532739,2.0659489e-7,0.0022938082,0.0000018950997,0.000024715717,0.00025392912,0.99660105,0.0003113024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014898179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021642647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.956335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004373139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001348345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887920692","doi":"","title":"La common law de A à Z","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Art; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.0208173487883105,"score_gpt":0.2516333608629966,"score_spread":0.2308160120746861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887920692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67830884,0.012646695,0.0027850287,0.038776867,0.001754955,0.0010647634,0.0004944864,0.0008174412,0.26335093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93500644,0.012020805,0.003936379,0.0015700683,0.0012345805,0.0000132585155,0.00008097398,0.00012202581,0.046015482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992486,0.0016285075,0.0006219746,0.001342235,0.0010282375,0.002893035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948353,0.00069868995,0.0009544225,0.0013927785,0.0003875484,0.0017312156],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013769569,0.0011769079,0.0012101143,0.00031533476,0.01476855,0.0012952894,0.004401642,0.0019862198,0.0012730537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028371977,0.0014375644,0.0010814221,0.00093159755,0.0071453718,0.0049054273,0.002352847,0.0019334875,0.0007305795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013025886,0.0008990117,0.022273116,0.00045280825,0.0012222184,0.0056636217,0.14340453,0.0024494864,0.000671669,0.7190199,0.06874079,0.033900302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0067811473,0.00019231257,0.052980237,0.0009359474,0.00095224543,0.00051326404,0.08088683,0.0032832173,0.00036766144,0.004408898,0.8468725,0.0018257442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08522985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028934015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7781317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005744673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019164964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887938608","doi":"","title":"Unpacking Sexual Assault: The Intersections of Violence in Canadian Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology (July 15-21, 2018)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unpacking; Sexual assault; Criminology; Sexual violence; Law; Poison control; Political science; Human factors and ergonomics; Sociology; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.034174825884515043,"score_gpt":0.3280133049602188,"score_spread":0.29383847907570376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887938608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93347245,0.00075289805,0.000004997143,0.007998908,0.002345792,0.00054597395,0.000089146444,0.00005793175,0.05473188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99653316,0.00010955508,0.00008160202,0.0006663011,0.00045012042,0.000039915674,0.000005887475,0.000013807485,0.0020996458],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973908,0.0005900275,0.00051157543,0.00036116736,0.0003343539,0.00081204483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980675,0.000609797,0.00034100947,0.0002995679,0.00050005526,0.00018209679],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012874064,0.00021938996,0.0004659826,0.00014726035,0.0011474869,0.000028509738,0.0007763036,0.00029402963,0.00041262776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061512046,0.00016674779,0.000116523115,0.00044393272,0.009157164,0.0002223225,0.0001585299,0.0005273679,0.00008815329],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009028972,0.00019856161,0.4492558,0.00007261744,0.0005045364,0.000017419752,0.26744616,0.000028152683,0.0013784035,0.22342113,0.052611638,0.0049752775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020279167,0.0005423004,0.40180594,0.00078844395,0.00022748967,0.0000054561233,0.18612738,0.00014976367,0.0019988318,0.014596921,0.39032382,0.0014057099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8325024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98383003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3377122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044686455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032894465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99353933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888727307","doi":"10.1017/s0008423918000343","title":"Imperious Temptations: Democratic Legitimacy and Indigenous Consent in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Political science; Indigenous; Democratic legitimacy; Fiduciary; Democracy; Law; Legitimacy; Veto; Jurisdiction; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.02935989210242186,"score_gpt":0.31781990845801944,"score_spread":0.2884600163555976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888727307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886588,0.00022353741,0.000006237173,0.0066894954,0.0003745043,0.0001202035,0.000006761105,0.0000021726323,0.003918299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985964,0.0000138952655,0.00022907909,0.0008762559,0.0001996651,0.0000015423075,7.4699905e-8,0.000002685273,0.000080429134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998024,0.00008808535,0.0002806936,0.00012582571,0.00044254193,0.0010388853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736196,0.00023688296,0.000078581856,0.00005604593,0.0004262262,0.00184031],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007943274,0.000076256205,0.00015575567,0.00013261886,0.0013361232,0.00014710956,0.00032077223,0.000028456732,0.000074032156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033979167,0.00006244952,0.000019979521,0.00042852672,0.0037178672,0.00030131784,0.000018228302,0.00014993074,0.000004378729],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055817163,0.00001664884,0.4048396,0.000015073817,0.000017923463,0.0004189159,0.07810055,0.0000049543223,0.00017305739,0.51064736,0.0018750423,0.0038852848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021047822,0.00007565721,0.95082843,0.00005964281,0.000009508659,0.00005954142,0.041040856,0.000025521449,0.000074935626,0.0042700837,0.0031806754,0.00016464436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9989404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54598886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004186135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03948924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888759974","doi":"","title":"Cross Cultural Marriages in Toronto: An Ethnographic Study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology (July 15-21, 2018)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Sociology; Geography; Gender studies; Anthropology","score_opus":0.051055320178995646,"score_gpt":0.40925632547896035,"score_spread":0.3582010052999647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888759974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96917266,0.001906762,8.651634e-7,0.0012328526,0.0024857123,0.0009774104,0.00004086519,0.0001849522,0.023997925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905136,0.00029540123,0.00022369364,0.00031075752,0.0011334535,0.000100737416,0.00001620702,0.000029383864,0.0073767556],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99514675,0.0014371275,0.0008330222,0.00082184066,0.0006264149,0.0011348149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749666,0.00045452834,0.0004824787,0.00051437144,0.00079218345,0.00025974665],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018861047,0.00046031782,0.0009121664,0.00012297691,0.0015378979,0.00014054748,0.00121154,0.00046237532,0.0018860737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006650266,0.00037392075,0.00024248239,0.00046338164,0.009697136,0.0012174614,0.0003492665,0.0005474667,0.00013521746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018005358,0.00073562906,0.69864404,0.000026196936,0.00036719488,0.000020902668,0.27764544,0.0000023012622,0.00033519833,0.004960259,0.0146711115,0.002411636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002002765,0.000635382,0.79598904,0.00005207893,0.0000802289,8.858796e-7,0.17210788,0.000008892439,0.000134024,0.0010742685,0.027228318,0.0006862505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06476956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40799466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3432251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005102741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010389247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891045845","doi":"","title":"주요제국의 행정제도 동향조사 : 캐나다의 연방정부조직","year":2005,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"기본연구과제","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Diversification (marketing strategy); Political science; Geography; Economic growth; Economy; Business; Economics; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.034948885510516364,"score_gpt":0.32591657645758454,"score_spread":0.2909676909470682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891045845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53587025,0.009296771,0.000025312942,0.110375576,0.0031701988,0.0011408483,0.00007342415,0.0005545862,0.33949304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9341309,0.0016502189,0.0009961635,0.0014829405,0.0041202405,0.000032384585,0.000007065518,0.000032058353,0.057548035],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99642485,0.00029494095,0.0005137656,0.0006323692,0.0009870029,0.0011470501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985626,0.00024905993,0.00023202562,0.0003390484,0.00024087401,0.00037642292],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006422943,0.00041922438,0.0005231264,0.000047436137,0.0019340888,0.00028456238,0.0007113148,0.0003634202,0.0040639364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004861838,0.00035458792,0.0003366012,0.0005572039,0.00085052056,0.00058069103,0.0003029102,0.00047489215,0.0074638687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008526539,0.00089034816,0.03258909,0.0001346561,0.00068090006,0.000057797886,0.29821628,0.00009186852,0.00081145,0.036117066,0.4384532,0.19187208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005189666,0.00007373172,0.032637764,0.00006637887,0.00009733588,0.0000015558478,0.013633536,0.00009007695,0.00019507605,0.00050548295,0.9515719,0.0006082043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077835815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074185883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5131187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006682756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000121525314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892097750","doi":"10.11575/prism/32770","title":"Comparing the Views of Judges and Lawyers Practicing in Alberta and in the Rest of Canada on Selected Issues in Family Law: Parenting, Self-represented Litigants and Mediation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rest (music); Mediation; Law; Child custody; Family mediation; Family law; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Criminology; Social psychology; Alternative dispute resolution; Medicine","score_opus":0.024229679603642706,"score_gpt":0.2545184291030331,"score_spread":0.23028874949939038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892097750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913879,0.00025831914,0.0000028096524,0.005716407,0.0000114209915,0.00020586788,2.3887358e-7,0.000002600659,0.0024144428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912214,0.0006848056,0.00010838843,0.000021567217,0.00000290783,3.7819555e-7,4.5687963e-7,0.0000013699271,0.00005798212],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914926,0.00031490892,0.00011212979,0.00010789733,0.00019838502,0.00011743493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989467,0.0007891249,0.00014287625,0.000053529817,0.000045586334,0.000022150227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044603203,0.000052220745,0.0001690138,0.00003325303,0.00015515117,0.000006195851,0.000101600934,0.000035119258,0.0000015454145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003930997,0.000033743367,0.000008137557,0.00016325018,0.00027479354,0.00015245673,0.00006362295,0.00007751292,4.389981e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035987814,0.00003040813,0.8903307,0.00002674089,0.000018196479,0.000002495209,0.10642887,5.6111867e-7,0.00047000288,0.0013156526,0.00013563002,0.0012048153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004359498,0.000013728106,0.9800413,0.00008330138,0.000009198211,1.12432765e-7,0.018126963,0.0002927316,0.000060558476,0.0000727312,0.0008192352,0.000044139117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93437934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9664406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08971071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067492045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004756398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13760145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892352327","doi":"","title":"Legal Parenthood and the Recognition of Alternative Family Forms in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New Brunswick Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.0201569405225987,"score_gpt":0.2356620238105425,"score_spread":0.2155050832879438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892352327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98034585,0.00007364746,0.000016544938,0.002912281,0.00017858282,0.00009482078,0.0000040661375,0.0000022410275,0.016371977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990789,0.00036376045,0.00026393504,0.000048299124,0.0000656528,1.5539923e-8,4.8580864e-7,0.0000015143448,0.00017738884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931514,0.000093493414,0.00011641889,0.000064725085,0.00027355377,0.0001366576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994314,0.0001220763,0.0001853857,0.000035679044,0.0001371548,0.00008835444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003181781,0.00005324019,0.00015053154,0.000019254776,0.00055361714,0.000016008284,0.00018601472,0.000033366123,0.000053891705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007498648,0.0000387873,0.000045106124,0.00008057472,0.00052827795,0.00027106117,0.000044379416,0.0002724788,5.7715187e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001133715,0.00015770418,0.1516349,0.000039639697,0.0004903869,0.00014691893,0.24352689,0.00006303369,0.00080632034,0.53470016,0.004392075,0.06290827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008884604,0.00009569793,0.39562583,0.0001504524,0.00012318563,0.000023959552,0.45207483,0.00007969552,0.00028991816,0.011990832,0.13031197,0.00034905647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99822056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5227093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016199307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000905447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42580312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892368281","doi":"","title":"Not All Law Is an Artifact: Jurisprudence Meets the Common Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisprudence; Artifact (error); Common law; Comparative law; Normative; Philosophy of law; Ideology; Public law; Political science; Private law; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0787690301470707,"score_gpt":0.3736214750902019,"score_spread":0.2948524449431312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892368281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33296156,0.00009286269,0.0000066922607,0.08977005,0.0004448777,0.00039380338,0.000007433754,0.00023580896,0.5760869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741267,0.000038043898,0.00026528165,0.01976221,0.00054924394,0.000015782889,0.0000011277672,0.000007743177,0.0052338913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983395,0.0002158702,0.00018080736,0.00026325797,0.00055796944,0.00044259944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991668,0.00018050126,0.00006738924,0.00027279853,0.00016596881,0.00014657908],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060619175,0.00013766093,0.00016287889,0.00000590065,0.0025266875,0.000237107,0.00058660784,0.0000982294,0.001200262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044814416,0.00007760984,0.00007252381,0.0001241638,0.0022874237,0.0004788471,0.00014476776,0.00013720895,0.0008792812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009143903,0.000054480835,0.00074126816,0.0000023988503,0.000037459246,0.000001728396,0.101226196,3.185979e-7,0.0006524854,0.88079363,0.015012772,0.0014681163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103199105,0.00008800228,0.0039398284,0.0000069800444,0.000021702355,3.6901713e-7,0.009256017,0.000021797005,0.005604053,0.0036260325,0.9771299,0.00020212178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15687262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3717191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96211714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009203826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001807594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896629719","doi":"10.3138/tjt.2018-0078","title":"On Grace Jantzen’s Feminist Philosophy of Religion: A Question Concerning Divine-Humanity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Humanity; Theology; Epistemology; Injustice; Perfection; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03582979904936109,"score_gpt":0.3400846337376386,"score_spread":0.3042548346882775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896629719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7549037,0.0028797293,0.00013900481,0.0044084867,0.0018337497,0.00017971695,0.0000044043218,0.00003115791,0.23562007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99697864,0.0004440932,0.00029405183,0.0002398232,0.0013929796,0.0000015749098,3.1885068e-7,0.00000634553,0.0006421876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984035,0.0005145278,0.00039311018,0.00011655713,0.00034921037,0.00022309065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826044,0.00035951645,0.00069047447,0.000100014986,0.0005002353,0.00008931325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011354649,0.000112475966,0.00034200432,0.00002294531,0.0005128197,0.000017587432,0.00032612044,0.00011640753,0.0004976473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011135208,0.000083118306,0.00012859666,0.00004381127,0.0012713384,0.00021544588,0.0000656927,0.00017056151,0.000021282505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048290362,0.00013526977,0.007229022,0.000015918637,0.00015373483,0.000015161718,0.063964576,0.000006276342,0.00044809436,0.91839015,0.007760571,0.0013983238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0063671255,0.01664765,0.110916436,0.0015582958,0.0006625877,0.00017749016,0.04454899,0.000052904194,0.0027346343,0.5471583,0.2675869,0.001588708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010926695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013321248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37123185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004338937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006377242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99565965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896992681","doi":"10.7202/1051103ar","title":"SERVICES DE SUPERVISION DES DROITS D’ACCÈS AU QUÉBEC","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social work review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.03519947571919116,"score_gpt":0.31314083640693086,"score_spread":0.27794136068773967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896992681","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1035114,0.66208416,0.0000015618898,0.14584513,0.0017060888,0.00083772733,0.000057884365,0.0000758248,0.08588021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72154194,0.20028114,0.00052850455,0.022798525,0.010188091,0.000109196,0.000028300847,0.00008809228,0.044436213],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961133,0.00076786726,0.00049606373,0.00047291935,0.0004621384,0.0016877194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976985,0.00014230874,0.00019165158,0.00020652535,0.0005404187,0.0012206249],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011747624,0.00039694898,0.0007351175,0.000044253306,0.007726424,0.00016584895,0.0007653886,0.0004131416,0.0045394124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034456252,0.00038577747,0.00038261255,0.00211892,0.0027932855,0.0004212723,0.00011418233,0.00035587352,0.0032416943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049121213,0.000038212565,0.032798152,0.0037945714,0.00018897103,0.00003247526,0.17505515,7.346317e-8,0.000003093317,0.011120689,0.09866957,0.6782941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009886292,0.000031818443,0.029804287,0.006109669,0.0002451686,0.0000020758341,0.006241892,0.0000013971926,0.0000016814586,0.00034163485,0.95667243,0.0004491057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9799295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85800284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009054869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034558158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897248548","doi":"","title":"Chapter Fifteen. The Canadian Constitution and Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"OpenEdition (OpenEdition)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0236415383864276,"score_gpt":0.25133188897481146,"score_spread":0.22769035058838386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897248548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042073685,0.0015236576,0.000010530869,0.05529109,0.0007955826,0.0012566256,0.0005220198,0.00004750022,0.94013226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80140877,0.0022532654,0.00026024826,0.01087693,0.0019357832,0.00011738125,0.0005280238,0.00003284572,0.18258674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801344,0.00007839605,0.00043394382,0.00046671796,0.00063597277,0.00037153007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852043,0.00014717362,0.00034797582,0.00022829568,0.00042526526,0.00033083768],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000496575,0.00036567953,0.00046327288,0.00012695421,0.0027798193,0.0002625965,0.00026726144,0.0004503566,0.0024286616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007204408,0.00027015628,0.000113750226,0.000051273546,0.0027475045,0.0025395285,0.00007754367,0.00036713027,0.00016685334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000105037,0.000008340378,0.000014884968,0.000013009789,0.000066825996,0.000011264593,0.0012078349,6.635952e-7,0.0000048603483,0.99050766,0.004778727,0.003375419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004055693,0.00008526282,0.0050285063,0.00025799987,0.00013850481,0.000011102557,0.0002786033,0.0000035017504,0.000023110726,0.046501983,0.9468303,0.0004355703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.103538685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7803443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94400567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002730598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017907703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897491608","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0042","title":"The Living Tree","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Constitution; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Original meaning; Politics; Subject (documents); Sociology; Style (visual arts); Political science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.0462312253613946,"score_gpt":0.25935693591547215,"score_spread":0.21312571055407756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897491608","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000024292833,0.0002693676,0.000004937718,0.00040147797,0.0004183072,0.0003632594,0.000021202932,0.00011683056,0.9983803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017205768,0.0031717487,0.000035276993,0.000020071284,0.00037395704,8.622425e-7,0.0000015881187,0.000018207595,0.9946577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867356,0.00007816723,0.000112797316,0.00029897483,0.00045246704,0.0003840268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985652,0.00040830928,0.00030692611,0.00041835682,0.00016862075,0.00013261205],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029627886,0.00024237442,0.00026213052,0.000024823836,0.007045292,0.00026669094,0.0012331808,0.00033869134,0.000036420464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013627543,0.00019209823,0.00024517614,0.000002317896,0.0014391998,0.00013640427,0.00061700353,0.00039218398,0.0000047087356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012662346,0.000002471557,0.000010180378,0.0000084844405,0.00014407221,0.000023133827,0.0063670524,1.8631209e-7,6.4384955e-7,0.961693,0.0067077535,0.025030395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008936351,0.000012245309,0.000094093644,0.000111761765,0.00010226507,2.5650132e-7,0.0012807162,0.0000013821401,0.0000011749861,0.0006357574,0.9974122,0.00025876303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030537064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012110659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9907045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036696813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010423448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898266942","doi":"10.1017/s0034412517000439","title":"‘Do not examine, but believe?’: a classicist's perspective on Teresa Morgan's<i>Roman Faith and Christian Faith</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religious Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Perspective (graphical); Philosophy; Christian faith; Theology; Art","score_opus":0.038293952413219465,"score_gpt":0.3387702753950732,"score_spread":0.3004763229818537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898266942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9059956,0.013236525,0.000006207109,0.01695172,0.00066007377,0.0008068175,0.000040851173,0.0003759058,0.061926275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835046,0.010514928,0.00028822076,0.0010543793,0.0014195123,0.00007066307,0.0000015470373,0.000034890214,0.0031112593],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703157,0.0002241921,0.00035008285,0.00081166637,0.00076962484,0.00081287697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980095,0.0004863942,0.00020404629,0.00028419276,0.00080865575,0.00020718171],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004286679,0.0004470435,0.0006576515,0.00008880375,0.0031016497,0.00018705358,0.00033117188,0.00016996621,0.000017356408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014810197,0.00033605695,0.00012325564,0.0003802659,0.0029850474,0.00016498308,0.00035615716,0.00029364624,0.00019084125],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021196384,0.00023686235,0.007363719,0.0000853196,0.0013007047,0.00008769737,0.7447658,0.0000010664479,0.00096564315,0.04527521,0.19594482,0.0037611674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017124746,0.0015199373,0.051168945,0.00036591178,0.00030122162,0.000010512016,0.80358887,0.000008980918,0.0013520835,0.0065457732,0.1319642,0.0014610781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017597914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014383205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07750897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008569209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006994437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898506936","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0018","title":"Same-sex marriage beyond Charter dialogue: Charter cases and contestation within government","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Parliament; Appeal; Law; Cabinet (room); Political science; Charter; Legislature; Caucus; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.017619022394133373,"score_gpt":0.246761469031435,"score_spread":0.22914244663730163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898506936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90283656,0.00046950637,0.00008526431,0.0023053763,0.00061729737,0.00023091516,0.00005604638,0.000026664195,0.093372345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961011,0.0003011702,0.0005600566,0.00013802445,0.00033685213,9.484154e-8,0.0000011805495,0.0000033412205,0.0025581813],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990686,0.0001354965,0.00011137576,0.00011765666,0.00038709506,0.0001797395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937963,0.00010128741,0.00017606097,0.00005461625,0.00015237484,0.00013605462],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003304758,0.00008420377,0.0001525737,0.0000046535847,0.001537455,0.000054573542,0.00013243203,0.000056755413,0.0009709294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007575518,0.00007728971,0.00005262426,0.000015076433,0.00076627557,0.00062934513,0.00005628501,0.0000804668,0.000008822575],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037805046,0.00019047044,0.023516065,0.000028714972,0.0004040823,0.00017044345,0.8828858,0.000001123862,0.0021866078,0.05751729,0.01815322,0.014568116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002683728,0.00083090994,0.08338078,0.00011008092,0.00017432582,0.00004666251,0.5731069,0.00004762352,0.00038834978,0.0007449944,0.33795998,0.0005257175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11157767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4660262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35444853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005134162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002246114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W289929389","doi":"","title":"The Windsor Report: Communion, Structure, and Covenant","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Ecclesiology; Sociology; Law; Blessing; Theology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.03598689748304259,"score_gpt":0.3470437128438006,"score_spread":0.311056815360758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W289929389","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082717285,0.6095836,0.000013793828,0.2421487,0.00021990342,0.0016409513,0.000013919028,0.00021378261,0.063448064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71462935,0.27789834,0.00021000176,0.004981941,0.0002284831,0.000030131352,0.0000037705668,0.0000047034114,0.0020133185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833834,0.00059310015,0.00029404846,0.00018820666,0.00026514658,0.0003211408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986713,0.0006816365,0.00016915528,0.0002540342,0.000105397114,0.000118456766],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013520782,0.00012313048,0.00028945084,0.0000046279397,0.0015158894,0.00005587937,0.0003570352,0.0000704767,0.00034564323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030498188,0.00005464155,0.000088390254,0.000157718,0.0013110635,0.00007967537,0.0001781035,0.0002091819,0.000024531077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010330032,0.000043898388,0.0058120415,0.00009309116,0.000070990354,0.000029291547,0.002849368,3.867565e-7,0.000017808718,0.50925845,0.033167306,0.44864702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055247292,0.00002114723,0.014094846,0.00013641185,0.000026964743,0.000014965908,0.00041045088,9.705819e-7,0.000006046926,0.0046598385,0.9804705,0.00010266108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042021423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012497586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9473031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057937672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024397006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899741704","doi":"10.29173/psur22","title":"The District of Sechelt, British Columbia and the Municipal System of Aboriginal Self-Government","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Undergraduate Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Misnomer; Public administration; Criticism; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.016476495759598715,"score_gpt":0.31311775407878895,"score_spread":0.29664125831919025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899741704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48637384,0.1286545,0.00016011395,0.26101574,0.001030244,0.005603772,0.00022996147,0.00023573474,0.11669609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9183676,0.080953725,0.00006296621,0.00011300846,0.000047479032,0.000025888025,8.975739e-8,0.0000034079408,0.00042582746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996537,0.0005020308,0.00046647326,0.00024187831,0.0014381956,0.0008144133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975709,0.0014599994,0.00022925886,0.0002325853,0.00024202467,0.00026523555],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004413977,0.00009384046,0.00039050498,0.000004439115,0.0015915004,0.00018515938,0.00069752097,0.000031928103,0.000011522338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020000113,0.000049176426,0.00012340365,0.00049921544,0.008237915,0.00017287966,0.00018132766,0.00008378064,0.0000041888766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002856103,0.00002541654,0.0021583764,0.00042874244,0.000025400765,0.0000010472746,0.00038323086,1.0986482e-8,0.000016427335,0.9838963,0.00034563502,0.012716544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045313207,0.0003896135,0.21077318,0.026431218,0.001502397,0.00009250079,0.028038269,0.00016143017,0.0002995155,0.0521733,0.6741166,0.0014906635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09123813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021228475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.931723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006525898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023870767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900548833","doi":"10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0996","title":"Women’s Court of Canada Act and Rules","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oñati Socio-legal Series","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Charter; Statute; Gender equality; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy; Gender studies","score_opus":0.015183532868191707,"score_gpt":0.2640684918246616,"score_spread":0.24888495895646986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900548833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94730324,0.00036208966,0.0000016441966,0.010525786,0.00045306623,0.00020933883,0.000047173693,0.00006475705,0.041032936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898096,0.00032642257,0.00047982234,0.00027198388,0.00049270043,0.00003531451,0.0000037619786,0.000014335754,0.008566105],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981252,0.00015470378,0.00026489087,0.00025054035,0.00059692474,0.00060771586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897486,0.00019570351,0.00016288078,0.00013191966,0.0003172819,0.00021736934],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000379427,0.0001939428,0.00035261456,0.000020310079,0.0017172549,0.00009598149,0.00023807857,0.00011866267,0.0005588178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006191385,0.00016337432,0.00004873778,0.00014711719,0.0021307084,0.0005195131,0.00012082855,0.00013008206,0.00001186496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020497192,0.00011470328,0.1075812,0.00023978976,0.00048578187,0.000021037278,0.60047275,0.0000011897988,0.0010519121,0.15288644,0.13105685,0.005883359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002984398,0.00015344581,0.07681372,0.00003679466,0.00002226457,0.000001549324,0.11521891,0.0000018506711,0.00063275115,0.0014818527,0.8049876,0.00035081364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61929274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82376564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67393076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007923229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085740036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901042035","doi":"10.1353/scb.2018.0015","title":"Bathsua Makin and Mary More with a Reply to More by Robert Whitehall: Educating English Daughters: Late Seventeenth-Century Debates ed. by Frances Teague and Margaret J. M. Ezell","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Scriblerian and the Kit-Cats","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Renaissance; Reading (process); History; Classics; Literature; Art history; Art; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.017136017581876523,"score_gpt":0.29623668402963504,"score_spread":0.27910066644775855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901042035","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002824728,0.9810026,0.0000022718245,0.009814601,0.0005347608,0.0022631392,0.00021461307,0.00009331719,0.0032499435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015405838,0.99198294,0.00017325675,0.0014791224,0.0007673638,0.0002777209,0.000074163916,0.00006849772,0.0036363797],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964334,0.00083969266,0.0005553345,0.00088607345,0.0005020675,0.0007834736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799114,0.000566576,0.00047111048,0.0004741304,0.00018009526,0.00031695465],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014507427,0.00072189,0.0013578027,0.00005662978,0.0020065373,0.00068491447,0.0007617794,0.00023853463,0.0000517797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036230285,0.00035524523,0.0001702181,0.00044148165,0.002388201,0.00031302526,0.0005216651,0.00051617116,0.000010674603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000258261,0.00015070451,0.00041843238,0.003810692,0.0013963552,0.000011071442,0.23330279,4.2906385e-7,0.0000042977445,0.0005749093,0.48393035,0.2761417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004957523,0.00006413597,0.000097134995,0.004099204,0.0004922154,0.000012263126,0.020212866,0.0000021315693,0.0000014619089,0.00006836851,0.9738852,0.0005692997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006132731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000567508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4899548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011398269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011893524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902178520","doi":"","title":"The Seal of Confession and Canadian Law","year":2011,"lang":"la","type":"article","venue":"Ius ecclesiae","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confession (law); Law; Political science; History; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.05008196712956786,"score_gpt":0.2893678218443773,"score_spread":0.23928585471480945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902178520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7333044,0.003976846,5.1358796e-7,0.0053970297,0.0006918498,0.00040836056,0.0000408501,0.00002352592,0.25615668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99689096,0.0012344094,0.00006496165,0.00019066213,0.00011617412,0.0000068072836,0.0000010229031,0.000008834804,0.0014861781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852157,0.00023168666,0.00024239352,0.00020846393,0.00028194388,0.000513933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906266,0.00018254285,0.00013674857,0.0001480771,0.00014830423,0.00032167055],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005229108,0.00014889895,0.0002203044,0.00001625194,0.0022520553,0.00006927716,0.00029003146,0.0001654288,0.00017331065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000106657935,0.00009396147,0.00006903259,0.00013101837,0.0018584474,0.00012710894,0.00008930919,0.0001648909,0.000045186855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038767852,0.000053539068,0.03174998,0.000050474588,0.00017034223,0.000022034108,0.20242164,2.9637013e-7,0.00027546164,0.750271,0.005165048,0.0097814035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005990207,0.00015062989,0.42202407,0.00017383568,0.00013119147,0.0000028771713,0.09137952,0.000028918854,0.0008779444,0.0043057664,0.4798306,0.0004956284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9015442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94712645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74596524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014100986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001821577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902207069","doi":"10.11575/prism/34304","title":"Overview of Provincial Wildlife Laws","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Law; Political science; Geography; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.09018609874813734,"score_gpt":0.3782934267132247,"score_spread":0.28810732796508737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902207069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5990009,0.00042341027,0.0000018635072,0.002608296,0.00012793028,0.0005296683,0.000019053008,0.0000025457832,0.39728636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98024875,0.00006215984,0.0023572473,0.00008844379,0.00037968723,0.0000149313155,0.0000051234274,0.000005311607,0.016838374],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999107,0.00009354682,0.00018101567,0.0001487307,0.00027888015,0.00019083965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963754,0.000052385876,0.00010579999,0.00008160408,0.000082666294,0.000039992425],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003861304,0.00007008985,0.00017774124,0.000009213091,0.0003545103,0.00008976248,0.00036534632,0.00005619499,0.0015065856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011796539,0.000055331617,0.00005210047,0.00014259167,0.00024015098,0.00023944787,0.0001564328,0.000050282924,0.0001989384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013446576,0.0011525761,0.11362629,0.000108050735,0.00020582658,0.000033416763,0.11771451,0.000032050386,0.0026416297,0.07057038,0.1580763,0.5357045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021857371,0.000018560751,0.019209169,0.000026256874,0.000015764304,1.17863074e-7,0.0023769725,0.0000015807053,0.00040653074,0.00028878835,0.9773283,0.00010936242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057617985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05330548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.819252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000760645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010088737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902281681","doi":"10.22215/etd/2010-06456","title":"Playing the survivor : how (and if) women recover from spousal abuse","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Auteur theory; Political science; Art history","score_opus":0.019725334461717783,"score_gpt":0.28991840716653405,"score_spread":0.2701930727048163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902281681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9532492,0.00029436764,8.7870666e-7,0.0020221872,0.0018889338,0.0003899573,0.000030473759,0.0000912034,0.042032763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85605204,0.0013572942,0.00019651515,0.00017280951,0.0010070335,0.00009925748,0.0001141615,0.00002603016,0.14097486],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983958,0.00016696376,0.00015981066,0.0003481978,0.0005063069,0.00042289824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987696,0.000640166,0.0001722765,0.00015698337,0.00014306062,0.00011794229],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049669103,0.00024232145,0.0003087377,0.000022603153,0.0020450242,0.00044351246,0.00035309122,0.00046255646,0.0010161785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046061978,0.00014319777,0.000082074526,0.0001146297,0.00022186819,0.00023296548,0.000032921245,0.00057330704,0.000058368492],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006773563,0.000033762022,0.009447019,0.000027822849,0.00025963012,0.0000032362532,0.9717897,3.073304e-7,0.00064455636,0.0013732063,0.0058231,0.0105299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002971894,0.000020692305,0.247941,0.00004974772,0.0000737616,1.2964603e-7,0.4659944,0.0000065260597,0.000063519736,0.00070582004,0.28426856,0.0005786565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0875439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36651635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50579536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016710703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007166214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902580100","doi":"","title":"Law, grace and same-sex marriage : Canadian Lutheran perspectives","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Corpus Université Laval (Université Laval)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Law; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.01738901821355757,"score_gpt":0.21143124017873327,"score_spread":0.1940422219651757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902580100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6417096,0.0019451629,0.000009005357,0.0041640718,0.0002711655,0.0004577282,0.000064179934,0.0002455881,0.3511335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96142894,0.003310138,0.00030565922,0.00019006286,0.000110397974,0.0000012940889,0.0000069225293,0.000026579022,0.03461998],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978366,0.00026492277,0.00013312564,0.00057987694,0.00040929051,0.0007761881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846405,0.00010993471,0.00012283788,0.00026076444,0.00026914314,0.00077327964],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027396836,0.00031771723,0.00035728014,0.00021030226,0.003282486,0.00008353966,0.0006170703,0.00024915466,0.00037949046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057449248,0.00034071843,0.00016972442,0.0005182558,0.0009626782,0.0006662325,0.00023091362,0.00031586393,0.00004336571],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008360411,0.000055652163,0.020286398,0.000012216639,0.000191889,0.00032148015,0.7286741,0.0000010168094,0.00083190936,0.24455151,0.000780918,0.004209312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012818681,0.00015038293,0.06266064,0.000045510038,0.0002182472,0.000011214625,0.6848934,0.000009031325,0.00083930825,0.0013014528,0.24777341,0.000815491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93490314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9513619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31971937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017077384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003149053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903125066","doi":"10.3138/9781442660601-012","title":"9. Reforming Family Dispute Resolution in Ontario: Systemic Changes and Cultural Shifts","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Resolution (logic); Political science; Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04737464023419731,"score_gpt":0.2446317178249067,"score_spread":0.19725707759070937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903125066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01091936,0.013454457,0.0000019154145,0.000052313524,0.0002309389,0.00056041335,0.0000275009,0.000050367733,0.9747027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.079865105,0.005520501,0.00015839374,0.000012155789,0.00014381249,0.000001116877,0.0000118816015,0.000014252075,0.9142728],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988675,0.000061903,0.00014665733,0.0002713005,0.00033936766,0.00031328222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993443,0.00003825785,0.00025241796,0.00013373306,0.000114180075,0.00011714482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021943536,0.00022009628,0.00039937932,0.000018694198,0.0004653325,0.00002191675,0.00026167068,0.00036212438,0.000050773273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010482586,0.00021424507,0.00008683202,0.0000012440746,0.00048366303,0.00031145805,0.0002788443,0.00022098637,0.000002221208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017120932,0.000020554273,0.0006487338,0.00026613765,0.00028341135,0.000029330686,0.7949665,0.0000018074248,0.00023213738,0.17672735,0.0008829611,0.025769861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003384698,0.000032030246,0.004739743,0.0005721901,0.00011655707,7.7903474e-7,0.009318715,0.0000023356422,0.0000029265063,0.00005659215,0.9844946,0.00032502107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9788495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9920051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9836117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024647238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006246949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87366605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903351489","doi":"","title":"Le droit à la vie privée en droit québécois et canadien","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.015778115863244693,"score_gpt":0.28564907073586904,"score_spread":0.26987095487262436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903351489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20111786,0.001870803,0.00007195932,0.07200819,0.0014561515,0.0003992676,0.000031721516,0.00014292807,0.7229011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8418205,0.0008351077,0.00082962296,0.0016046047,0.0011959802,0.000024279394,0.0000042516126,0.000022849163,0.15366282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972342,0.0005419709,0.00033353886,0.0004786052,0.00051392586,0.0008977175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854463,0.00044467254,0.00012740701,0.00022887481,0.00026846552,0.00038592055],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095793157,0.00027410206,0.00037657918,0.000033409404,0.0012510583,0.0001532435,0.0005377826,0.00033377006,0.0014641943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005260582,0.00025784806,0.00017567455,0.0004689357,0.0022441794,0.0005150389,0.0002377969,0.00030907302,0.0012992406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058369887,0.00009462014,0.0030985677,0.000021769878,0.0001403676,0.000016981649,0.10697337,0.0000014706656,0.00003502852,0.8562,0.021415489,0.011996531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028564286,0.00011627597,0.017321609,0.000052265565,0.000052946525,0.000005301045,0.029408962,0.00003990789,0.000109490684,0.006531831,0.9456631,0.00041264456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96259516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99090654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9242476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010063984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009210966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903789803","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwy048","title":"Trinity Western University v The Law Society of Upper Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Statutory law; Supreme court; Political science; Appeal; Constitution; Common law; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.020196930270328102,"score_gpt":0.2676772516344703,"score_spread":0.24748032136414222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903789803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94275546,0.00050187454,0.000013121329,0.0118219275,0.00031603716,0.000067797184,0.000003825071,0.0000034614752,0.044516467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99473375,0.0037238325,0.00007435174,0.00064304343,0.00024855847,4.40048e-8,1.2433219e-7,0.0000017560577,0.0005745159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935365,0.00008661675,0.00013283476,0.000048887414,0.0002603938,0.00011763629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993815,0.00008779677,0.00017998448,0.00004119351,0.0002459577,0.00006359863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033398336,0.000051053386,0.00012740536,0.0000033200797,0.0008839398,0.000016936188,0.00013682099,0.000047764668,0.0000069614075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014764599,0.000028914621,0.00008411371,0.000058108188,0.000777157,0.000118891185,0.00004065134,0.000114979615,2.2637305e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041898218,0.00014622479,0.08736287,0.00008868226,0.000701191,0.000027845637,0.10868543,0.000007674627,0.0007318152,0.70461136,0.09481808,0.0023998464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025898466,0.00006946397,0.006591905,0.000028830591,0.00003277224,0.0000038076626,0.005529775,9.734413e-7,0.00018937893,0.00043781832,0.98680675,0.000049555714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6341507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7345196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89198864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108483735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000121317986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.679864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903983943","doi":"","title":"New Brunswick acts and regulations - Family Services Act","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.05548825549410066,"score_gpt":0.3025754819052912,"score_spread":0.24708722641119055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903983943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54160494,0.00038536053,0.000035619072,0.0022399041,0.00014412082,0.00018492219,5.45488e-7,0.00015003365,0.45525452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741742,0.00021713032,0.004773574,0.00033250757,0.00015485576,0.0000016960778,9.10977e-7,0.000004559211,0.02034059],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932337,0.000045223293,0.00009575689,0.00014487514,0.00018147661,0.00020931046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996267,0.00004928691,0.000040306135,0.00007296224,0.00005729476,0.00015343748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012241144,0.000078115605,0.00009730493,0.000014855831,0.00066177826,0.00006209997,0.00012802379,0.00006539244,0.00050320337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031547093,0.000057389625,0.000028765071,0.00012517498,0.00012239296,0.00036977648,0.000060066664,0.000049762886,0.0000847663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001853324,0.000053570442,0.18522254,0.000027067219,0.00010636592,0.0000028492896,0.44698438,8.258777e-7,0.00043318514,0.3366018,0.009485799,0.021063104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001247048,0.000012687754,0.8701987,0.000008850481,0.000014565917,1.4458247e-7,0.023445293,0.0000049524265,0.00006223275,0.0015652264,0.1044465,0.00011612675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2622681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13955699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68497616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003596946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000094337134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8761439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904557932","doi":"","title":"JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE: CONTEMPORARY PRESSURES AND APPROPRIATE RESPONSES","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Judicial independence; Independence (probability theory); Law; Criticism; Political science; Judicial activism; Supreme court; Judicial review; Government (linguistics); Judicial opinion; Judicial discretion; Citizenship; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07678461801054327,"score_gpt":0.3393280790654607,"score_spread":0.26254346105491744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904557932","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035317015,0.6343788,8.3650366e-7,0.19276212,0.00031156844,0.0019156846,0.000030120951,0.000077621575,0.13520621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8721854,0.11780503,0.000015685142,0.004937846,0.0002559992,0.0000444664,0.0000019538888,0.000008239568,0.0047453837],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830735,0.0006388316,0.00018537763,0.0001797604,0.00034756077,0.0003411372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991895,0.00015359613,0.000078474404,0.00015967854,0.000111837566,0.00030689026],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016176807,0.00011740452,0.00025221924,0.000023683766,0.0017244443,0.00009495249,0.000316354,0.00008344899,0.00031357812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010747769,0.000074018564,0.000054777825,0.0002037814,0.0005972137,0.00014061022,0.00004410049,0.00020145689,0.00008860394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013525774,0.000052206302,0.09157014,0.0016879761,0.00053465273,0.00043725915,0.06996105,0.0000015437141,0.00002403968,0.15765147,0.504116,0.17382841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007163872,0.000009199016,0.020432701,0.00037388716,0.000035010864,0.0000041364956,0.0006302243,5.533592e-7,8.378668e-7,0.00053220236,0.97778934,0.00012027323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6917705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74685776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8368684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016269636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066337705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905366745","doi":"","title":"Why Canada's Medical Assistance in Dying Legislation Should Be C(h)arter Compliant and What It May Help to Avoid","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Criminal code; Criminal law; Value (mathematics)","score_opus":0.03506262982360589,"score_gpt":0.3234960041081253,"score_spread":0.28843337428451943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905366745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5119872,0.0040248567,0.00091032375,0.47885695,0.0008442413,0.00031827422,0.0000018631392,0.000026740629,0.003029522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885607,0.0032881696,0.000062211024,0.0064679724,0.0007183868,0.0000067852375,9.909046e-7,0.000009374992,0.00088544335],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966115,0.00023403583,0.00028071486,0.0002254429,0.00097537914,0.0016729552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930906,0.0001207165,0.00009918156,0.00007059305,0.00015719615,0.00024326175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022174155,0.0001380114,0.00020625422,0.00004642062,0.0011060095,0.00031613506,0.00025707364,0.00010509302,0.0001257368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003801017,0.00011208349,0.00003391527,0.00024086917,0.00024507963,0.0006185649,0.00005584122,0.001028167,0.000006169538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052356237,0.00031838522,0.12215533,0.00006493534,0.0007848534,0.00017416965,0.22529565,0.000065891836,0.0011205175,0.15550402,0.15596636,0.33802634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011011782,0.00026850254,0.02237471,0.00041712672,0.0000325538,0.0000708568,0.17780526,0.00023589062,0.000041738283,0.0066177417,0.7904201,0.0006143181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4737909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99654114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6344538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029173484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022553308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85066426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905908727","doi":"","title":"Are You My Mother? Parentage in a Non-Conjugal Family","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Family law; Legislation; Declaration; Law; Legislature; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Nuclear family; Sociology; Genealogy; History","score_opus":0.03444419869297577,"score_gpt":0.3142927364127994,"score_spread":0.27984853771982365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905908727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8244055,0.00040347196,0.0000042463867,0.0035983666,0.0006771879,0.00046756284,0.000025584062,0.00009697293,0.1703211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917151,0.00013212912,0.00018280932,0.00096345297,0.0006320336,0.00007376859,0.0000024193905,0.000019877776,0.0062784296],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796927,0.0001524559,0.00027962573,0.00042054476,0.000525431,0.00065266225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877477,0.00007366225,0.00032699903,0.0004698867,0.000098988894,0.00025571915],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005659383,0.0002244605,0.00036804524,0.000026824298,0.0023769874,0.00052736216,0.0008806975,0.00018281303,0.0002592271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067181943,0.00019336691,0.0001369833,0.00009838345,0.00074494677,0.00070434145,0.00022725058,0.00035911176,0.0007116618],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006850473,0.00025496644,0.92009944,0.000054837015,0.00011770083,0.00012797072,0.026095591,0.000015797132,0.0010873511,0.027356664,0.021443889,0.003277268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084225286,0.000020620526,0.7491163,0.00010585178,0.000014255477,3.0065263e-7,0.016580919,0.00001115806,0.00008696273,0.00081256044,0.23205064,0.00035816268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11031624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13797279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21060675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032785407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050978768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905935632","doi":"","title":"A History of Canadian Legal Thought: Collected Essays","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04765222907171745,"score_gpt":0.2853197804898607,"score_spread":0.23766755141814322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905935632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048900157,0.18680428,1.48264e-7,0.17487605,0.00033142563,0.00087497436,0.000028647926,0.000028595354,0.6365669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66852194,0.13502946,0.00019881174,0.042988252,0.0005570312,0.00007159322,0.000020305843,0.000029455758,0.15258314],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835277,0.00036168387,0.00025832682,0.0001617936,0.00029748853,0.0005679589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868685,0.000056414297,0.00010364413,0.00024052855,0.00021819229,0.0006943904],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082922564,0.00013710276,0.00035130765,0.00012436134,0.0009257474,0.000027509712,0.00050977484,0.00008363289,0.0011531971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069742795,0.00009684496,0.00012806088,0.00084887544,0.000392819,0.00010216006,0.000009169133,0.00018804599,0.000120466546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010459693,0.0000051656225,0.00006505936,0.00008260288,0.000027296393,0.000016482649,0.0060294345,3.3799301e-7,0.000003801444,0.1917659,0.7950751,0.006927754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053404405,0.000013556494,0.003273384,0.00035267317,0.000052968444,0.0000015227989,0.00026767256,9.1007126e-7,7.509444e-7,0.000118577795,0.9957324,0.00013212352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99543655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66803294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051337397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005598592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906528280","doi":"","title":"Church Property: A Commentary on Canon Law Governing Temporal Goods in the United States and Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ius ecclesiae","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law; Canon law; Canon; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.02247562225050992,"score_gpt":0.28185571192705505,"score_spread":0.25938008967654513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906528280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94019014,0.00005307478,1.6120241e-7,0.0466896,0.00014859911,0.00031061872,0.000026862233,0.000023191586,0.012557749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98970205,0.000053361422,0.00004772207,0.009663754,0.00012458871,0.00002356454,0.00002697346,0.0000072094035,0.00035076638],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875563,0.00023050139,0.00013254223,0.0001646964,0.00040409653,0.00031250896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949086,0.0002454568,0.00005389013,0.000103477345,0.000031547363,0.00007477172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047528895,0.00011605759,0.00012889727,0.00001625213,0.0008549916,0.00009509397,0.00022589437,0.000056157525,0.000034938665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008403116,0.00006302307,0.000017859658,0.00016848034,0.00032221596,0.00008755337,0.00005107644,0.00035426364,0.0000026659036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007817128,0.0002033576,0.5731807,0.00004529388,0.00008590743,0.00013428937,0.15746477,0.00006982683,0.00063038734,0.011627682,0.25192952,0.004550088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031459183,0.00004169466,0.085193865,0.00002299828,0.000008765444,0.0000010243483,0.028083522,0.000075779375,0.000038249247,0.0000975918,0.8859481,0.00017381144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99789226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6340186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023890272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000107775144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6575991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906659702","doi":"","title":"Building Public Trusts and Acceptance in the Nuclear Safety Administration from a Legal Perspective: focused on the Constitutional Duty to Consult and Accommodate Aboriginal Peoples in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Perspective (graphical); Administration (probate law); Law; Political science; Public administration; Computer science","score_opus":0.040055701925358074,"score_gpt":0.31491391552582326,"score_spread":0.2748582136004652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906659702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.800077,0.00010599552,0.000006015223,0.18278314,0.00009810188,0.00035221505,0.00005905223,0.000014160178,0.016504288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998005,0.000040917774,0.00016728189,0.0016321193,0.00009972663,0.00003453407,0.0000036600397,0.0000034285006,0.000013355202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984472,0.0003591818,0.00017056798,0.0002504975,0.00047161282,0.00030097843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885607,0.00066689955,0.00006222404,0.000102289654,0.00016562315,0.00014691493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008300911,0.00011683521,0.00015073606,0.000024923065,0.00076193415,0.00055041694,0.000280483,0.00004634495,0.000043620195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012810014,0.000071674745,0.000014871999,0.00033851512,0.00083060935,0.0005973447,0.000054732056,0.00021586126,0.0000019353106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035574612,0.000022136692,0.018219085,0.0000010260965,0.000010517179,0.0000048929596,0.013692478,0.0000018919006,0.0000043941354,0.9670026,0.0006240217,0.00038139863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011484626,0.00004241943,0.3605758,0.000028152393,0.000009403655,0.0000039856113,0.15277334,0.00008562569,0.0000059185636,0.0047594155,0.48028973,0.00027775695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90265876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96224314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011064545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017407252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58602583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907265697","doi":"10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0993","title":"Impact of the Feminist Judgment Writing Projects","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oñati Socio-legal Series","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03517177143915501,"score_gpt":0.33798963998670284,"score_spread":0.30281786854754783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907265697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9052458,0.00016835664,0.0000023923326,0.004465697,0.00052524864,0.000593634,0.00003528519,0.00011070338,0.08885291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99358636,0.00007048858,0.00038262492,0.00015412683,0.00090417627,0.000045493573,0.0000026182286,0.000019131723,0.0048350017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976936,0.00030831216,0.00037505332,0.0002895618,0.0007247138,0.00060874864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876636,0.0001912555,0.00030161062,0.00025772533,0.00036704095,0.00011600751],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005321485,0.00023782675,0.00033154647,0.000022926668,0.002935485,0.00018035612,0.00052199437,0.00015425678,0.00033067938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083755585,0.00014853381,0.00033924813,0.0004399698,0.002944973,0.00047030192,0.00025484362,0.00021405534,0.000046905505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000122068945,0.00024545024,0.48459035,0.00011786739,0.00046578055,0.000004840322,0.40404403,0.000003786374,0.003267692,0.0706374,0.03304403,0.0034566987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009072099,0.0008961814,0.5398905,0.00031567225,0.00014458799,0.000006531556,0.20956562,0.000008106641,0.004454755,0.0014282868,0.24144472,0.0009378094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015172873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050245044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2084007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066102087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047052695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907449402","doi":"10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0994","title":"Turning Feminist Judgments into Jurisprudence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oñati Socio-legal Series","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Tribunal; Humanities; Context (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Constitutional court; Political science; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Constitution","score_opus":0.022731790360261055,"score_gpt":0.32467900587218756,"score_spread":0.3019472155119265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907449402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7201125,0.0008528663,0.00008304493,0.019167641,0.0026768246,0.00076470006,0.000023448942,0.000756553,0.25556242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97411895,0.0002860766,0.0033517831,0.0008734093,0.0019554966,0.00007642301,0.0000092653145,0.000033600718,0.019295001],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969002,0.00030241846,0.00041781904,0.00053650624,0.0009674343,0.00087563053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985752,0.0002537061,0.00023942559,0.00026968887,0.0003729104,0.0002890856],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063095166,0.00034368294,0.00040433242,0.000045155048,0.005384649,0.00050688925,0.0006653795,0.00026023446,0.00086416805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001171169,0.00030485922,0.00016979719,0.0004501085,0.0032889654,0.0012204761,0.000306519,0.0003333696,0.00079737115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015927447,0.00020325954,0.07479859,0.00013781218,0.0003311901,0.000044402503,0.67954844,0.0000025765682,0.004059187,0.15016666,0.0818044,0.008744197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030867272,0.0001880758,0.010111041,0.00008638913,0.000042926113,0.0000024998585,0.06722498,0.0000034934242,0.0015434474,0.002327443,0.9176088,0.0005522242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010708785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009173394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8358044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006983895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027288805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908526279","doi":"10.7202/1055262ar","title":"Le mariage en Chine depuis 1978 : entre les normes sociales et l’État","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012726183318328164,"score_gpt":0.2610788444493381,"score_spread":0.24835266113100993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908526279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7800861,0.008381515,0.00016050976,0.044345852,0.0013768981,0.0006435702,0.00011584795,0.00020139467,0.16468832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8785001,0.0038443117,0.0012163733,0.0011081891,0.0007848902,0.000029177898,0.00004329107,0.000040366536,0.11443331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963583,0.00088728627,0.0004281631,0.00058549683,0.0006405227,0.0011002844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802035,0.0010749091,0.0002665755,0.00024165412,0.0001226663,0.00027383683],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009865903,0.0004506823,0.0006481218,0.00006176912,0.0016739819,0.0002226977,0.0006152658,0.0008869542,0.0015181174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058910577,0.0004524296,0.00043719972,0.00045135643,0.0024389708,0.00050941785,0.00020069815,0.0010447963,0.00073366123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038528706,0.00019932904,0.061526425,0.00020795836,0.00045963572,0.00004181142,0.13845284,0.0000790802,0.00052828336,0.742173,0.0074083307,0.048884764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014435218,0.00013877219,0.14523062,0.00019802533,0.00026585406,0.000010550432,0.08872033,0.00012218389,0.00033765507,0.04458035,0.71772724,0.001224899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046254527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024173541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7103189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002272941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038499993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909059062","doi":"","title":"An Autonomy-Based Approach to Section 15(1) of the Charter","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Autonomy; Charter; Section (typography); Plaintiff; Law; Test (biology); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.031028321625016623,"score_gpt":0.26764931251597757,"score_spread":0.23662099089096095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909059062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6738052,0.006537229,0.03149989,0.022441978,0.008471376,0.0031750894,0.00019057433,0.00030102176,0.25357765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908078,0.000033450826,0.0039435164,0.00025280507,0.0017785616,0.000053617903,0.00001534608,0.000011805089,0.0031031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979284,0.00031129376,0.0004918691,0.0004328617,0.00037265447,0.0004629439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998867,0.00013034564,0.00024789403,0.00033268917,0.000288741,0.00013334205],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000578367,0.00026337526,0.000348233,0.000065081585,0.0013411153,0.00009024605,0.00044938183,0.00027014932,0.00009397364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000108204724,0.00020699164,0.00025465194,0.0007700215,0.0024395874,0.0003055988,0.00007043289,0.00024150121,0.00005184623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002059828,0.0007902549,0.009001111,0.00020313702,0.0000749243,0.0000015953626,0.009914445,0.03077285,0.0015741693,0.94383675,0.0014183313,0.0023918308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009657991,0.00016148122,0.067438826,0.00073003036,0.00034005134,0.000012936883,0.016889522,0.0054595456,0.0023523963,0.00093050336,0.9037152,0.0010036916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009468019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004714115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94290626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068335375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041717253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909513918","doi":"10.7202/1055260ar","title":"Spousal Support in Quebec: Resisting the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Antipathy; Jurisdiction; Family law; Legislature; Law; Political science; Child support; Advisory committee; Autonomy; Legislation; Politics; Public administration","score_opus":0.024794405877916738,"score_gpt":0.30441301151174965,"score_spread":0.2796186056338329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909513918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9265845,0.00018564041,0.000033165164,0.0073913783,0.00047349095,0.0005048749,0.000011098451,0.00014165755,0.064674184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8758039,0.00013599583,0.00062669814,0.001550504,0.0005215566,0.000031744694,0.000013605544,0.000025562955,0.121290445],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974414,0.00026017672,0.0004885513,0.00038711913,0.0006107474,0.00081201183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988005,0.00044405283,0.00017484282,0.0002637977,0.00017880928,0.000137993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019312181,0.00021885971,0.00033749398,0.00006295824,0.00087028526,0.00014016159,0.0005924714,0.00030414728,0.000644785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00147375,0.00016906571,0.00015960401,0.0003502201,0.0008020934,0.00027999125,0.000099138306,0.00056602934,0.00029088728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021606975,0.00016700124,0.42763692,0.00014366375,0.00021419747,0.00031759668,0.31247604,0.00033119268,0.001425627,0.12084578,0.07594702,0.0602789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009458658,0.00009817138,0.21830109,0.00008281324,0.000054091342,0.000009781978,0.16877028,0.00011126208,0.00012558345,0.0031299929,0.6075972,0.0007738743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.120839566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17208204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5316502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001396895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029879514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88501483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910137634","doi":"10.7202/1055256ar","title":"Rethinking the Role of Lawyers for Children : Child Representation in Canadian Family Relationship Cases","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; The King's University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Best interests; Presumption; Economic Justice; Welfare; Family law; Representation (politics); Law; Political science; Child protection; Psychology; Public relations; Business","score_opus":0.02003630692793654,"score_gpt":0.27703065880631134,"score_spread":0.25699435187837477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910137634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9745632,0.00041028598,0.000008418775,0.0019979696,0.00006837226,0.0006739611,0.000019581179,0.000018631321,0.02223961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986942,0.000037394104,0.00020383722,0.00026643515,0.00006838597,0.000031358766,0.00001665846,0.0000073964598,0.0006743777],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907,0.00013813982,0.00015347612,0.0001470583,0.0001808204,0.00031050673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990727,0.00060258503,0.0000855878,0.00011303463,0.000053212207,0.00007289604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063553656,0.00006721994,0.00011830373,0.00005394456,0.00073432224,0.00003457592,0.00018668486,0.00014899662,0.000009828919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010106779,0.00005674623,0.000070174974,0.00024583956,0.00027767668,0.00012446307,0.000011456617,0.00023105704,0.0000055445357],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009468034,0.0000055949813,0.79169655,0.000004925453,0.000022974511,7.0382686e-7,0.10059726,0.00018265746,0.000035134206,0.10558133,0.000113452326,0.0017499513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020469962,0.000015113659,0.93001515,0.000028707964,0.000017802719,9.598665e-7,0.041152734,0.00006878462,0.000066138084,0.02474871,0.0035784843,0.00010271614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79033786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7585495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1383186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009246061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010504145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5647887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910244147","doi":"10.7202/1055259ar","title":"Recomposition familiale et multiparentalité : un exemple du difficile arrimage du droit à la famille contemporaine","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.011141911569283488,"score_gpt":0.24888406469075172,"score_spread":0.23774215312146824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910244147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9148205,0.0019982895,0.0006691898,0.0075654406,0.0016131677,0.0010131743,0.00029727578,0.00021849273,0.07180449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94343275,0.0019285493,0.001120283,0.0011763003,0.0005812065,0.000076045995,0.0001783405,0.00006346799,0.05144305],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960106,0.0010129972,0.00060355646,0.0007365812,0.00066068664,0.0009755967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978102,0.0009421967,0.00035331512,0.0003363783,0.0002020607,0.00035584104],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001266449,0.00049663737,0.0007283077,0.00006934086,0.001174407,0.00021418087,0.00051782693,0.0006951202,0.0008428191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040557698,0.00053021,0.00043508483,0.00043877488,0.0017549719,0.0005592972,0.00016918947,0.0008340277,0.00061933714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049987726,0.0022869692,0.07370406,0.0007272051,0.0013571602,0.00043734978,0.48838052,0.0007467706,0.02219337,0.31945825,0.028725455,0.06148301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0076522804,0.0006739474,0.12961012,0.00077340764,0.00049308426,0.00008108775,0.1833643,0.004797374,0.0027813304,0.016388329,0.65031797,0.0030667875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038310047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033907262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6215925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028549745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000101596845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910874826","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvb4btbx.6","title":"Canadian Constitution-Making in the British World","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"MQUP eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.03777690729711041,"score_gpt":0.2893359261344656,"score_spread":0.2515590188373552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910874826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021800157,0.0004237209,7.692946e-7,0.00174652,0.0005249265,0.00054088153,0.000029390547,0.00004444228,0.99647135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21489453,0.00003627236,0.000041738556,0.0013405848,0.0009669387,0.0000266512,0.0000049465007,0.000013166667,0.78267515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985108,0.00007419894,0.00023272318,0.0002852177,0.00042390314,0.00047320634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993564,0.00014270202,0.00010573452,0.00016196954,0.00011846765,0.00011471284],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051109225,0.00019220333,0.00024900964,0.000079905556,0.0027319524,0.0005819308,0.0004722078,0.00023954183,0.0011334157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011551422,0.0001694795,0.000114163566,0.000034898923,0.0011006542,0.0000510077,0.000052412208,0.00040326378,0.00031167324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022024446,0.0000034252375,0.00025440773,0.0000126861005,0.00005516242,0.00024734435,0.035319433,2.8611555e-7,4.9156836e-7,0.8883765,0.06500718,0.010720899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062577135,0.000005514597,0.00023236073,0.00031628466,0.000021323305,0.0000033004508,0.0017168053,2.899848e-7,2.3003848e-7,0.013549523,0.98385334,0.00023846776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8115592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91884613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010384376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057762023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911163197","doi":"","title":"Placing Vulnerability at the Centre of Section 15(1) of the Charter: A Case Comment on Inglis V British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Charter; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Section (typography); Law; Order (exchange); Vulnerability assessment; Political science; Public administration; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer security; Psychological resilience; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.059604692739547493,"score_gpt":0.2800088711088762,"score_spread":0.22040417836932868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911163197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9782495,0.00027912302,0.00001787608,0.008449071,0.00056275004,0.00069790444,0.00011847024,0.000023710776,0.011601606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907404,0.000079408084,0.000036149504,0.00012275526,0.00012202642,0.000015538331,0.000004948594,0.0000041911485,0.0005409482],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981698,0.00059177156,0.0004578291,0.00020188346,0.0003688695,0.00020985387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844116,0.0004016991,0.00037027066,0.00025444635,0.00045404906,0.00007837131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011278628,0.00009689375,0.000287521,0.000016107118,0.0012875156,0.00007926132,0.0002327891,0.000094201496,0.00011778571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013440356,0.00008100855,0.00015614823,0.00027997934,0.0022513848,0.00013405831,0.00017571705,0.0001470703,0.000002001694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002073427,0.0018773677,0.56347966,0.00084516197,0.00081539317,0.0000759388,0.24671444,0.0014183172,0.0007939581,0.1308028,0.03899611,0.013973489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030766423,0.0002726152,0.046127573,0.0015979909,0.0003119451,0.00023552668,0.26625708,0.00017470683,0.0011372508,0.00054016453,0.6795958,0.0006726621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06273236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41620597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6405997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047600246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017202216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99026597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911580633","doi":"10.12783/dtssehs/meit2018/27668","title":"The Canadian School–A School in Sichuan for Missionaries’ Children","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DEStech Transactions on Social Science Education and Human Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Regret; Context (archaeology); School education; Political science; Geography; Pedagogy; Sociology; Archaeology; Law","score_opus":0.031070158470219968,"score_gpt":0.36525607024525436,"score_spread":0.33418591177503437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911580633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9419714,0.00008818676,0.000060755538,0.014519933,0.0011527477,0.0016243972,0.000009226262,0.00005984083,0.04051348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99467945,0.000030270136,0.00020974934,0.00045990234,0.00013605205,0.000103745624,9.479203e-7,0.0000052933974,0.004374574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976693,0.00006343901,0.00020505761,0.0004906055,0.00085656345,0.00071503926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986125,0.0001161033,0.00007779449,0.00016675814,0.0004524714,0.0005743732],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026348976,0.00012300254,0.000119558135,0.00030413145,0.023966024,0.0011931207,0.00082403293,0.00008129211,0.00012550986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044508872,0.0000955285,0.00004803735,0.0017408316,0.004706104,0.001022735,0.000011012544,0.00026547315,0.000044885004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026544592,0.00041112804,0.06865012,0.00001346118,0.000014736807,2.227941e-7,0.07456441,0.00002355769,0.0040858597,0.73627454,0.0016976236,0.11423778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031381505,0.000058540783,0.91201746,0.000033354394,0.00000913977,8.6036744e-7,0.03950199,0.000019969197,0.00021333588,0.004279303,0.043224026,0.0003281887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11568161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31314942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84336734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001800531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076585542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912807746","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.001.0001","title":"The Oxford Handbook of the Canadian Constitution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Federalism; Law; Political science; Charter; Indigenous; Constitutional law; Constitutional economics; Population; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03634714006224919,"score_gpt":0.25069199540549825,"score_spread":0.21434485534324904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912807746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004553629,0.0003816158,0.0000036759034,0.00059640675,0.0007138214,0.00074535847,0.00011767747,0.000031275886,0.99736464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0050774533,0.0013756761,0.000019343379,0.00003650803,0.0001830068,0.0000018228931,0.0000056370113,0.000007810693,0.99329275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851936,0.00017861302,0.00014507625,0.00023302247,0.0004995314,0.0004243901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844307,0.00015919152,0.00042052285,0.00048875384,0.00031050408,0.00017794743],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031729715,0.00020771226,0.00026483074,0.000033915432,0.011033351,0.00017268908,0.0016155556,0.00040445916,0.000011530513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001542817,0.00013734281,0.00025694328,0.000012304516,0.0048637404,0.00010847634,0.0003527952,0.00042796019,8.269796e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018893132,0.0000032333387,0.000112659094,0.000022341737,0.00016765505,0.000009628613,0.0046344534,0.0000018870875,0.0000013139344,0.9435369,0.048537444,0.002953584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017705414,0.000008620025,0.00017194627,0.00018580547,0.00012953766,3.9502942e-7,0.00065377937,0.0000014389417,0.000016864095,0.0004855691,0.9979905,0.00017848237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3736089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88913137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94945306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016515076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027183304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99784446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913281582","doi":"10.1177/0067205x1804600411","title":"The Dilemma of Indigenous Self-Government in Canada: Indigenous Rights and Canadian Federalism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Indigenous rights; Sovereignty; Federalism; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Constitution; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Dual federalism; Minority rights; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.015484743323703483,"score_gpt":0.26154858220707594,"score_spread":0.24606383888337247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913281582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89773464,0.06148927,1.1947967e-7,0.0055097067,0.00043382577,0.001915577,0.000053859072,0.000025063426,0.03283792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98529834,0.012671821,0.000044367094,0.0014968237,0.00013825593,0.000047693567,0.0000020016346,0.0000073771666,0.00029335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794644,0.00027014303,0.0003658907,0.00020474358,0.0005931783,0.000619593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921185,0.00012368266,0.00015192122,0.00014297414,0.00012540484,0.00024416918],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058514084,0.0001590141,0.00035436449,0.0000073523547,0.0035780685,0.00010302364,0.00028830447,0.000057480396,0.000058982518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007927984,0.00009991859,0.00004737868,0.00015695799,0.00033387163,0.00010776189,0.000059274775,0.00013632212,0.000009030706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053158048,0.00026299403,0.16317376,0.0030152986,0.0009943654,0.0003139525,0.3420945,0.0000015546871,0.000018393466,0.3775204,0.043114617,0.06943698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118916694,0.000035441164,0.030647699,0.0004041578,0.00002193438,0.0000023196387,0.0006528941,5.545628e-7,0.0000144120195,0.00037612094,0.9675405,0.00018503718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99989575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9244259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026569322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013330323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913453585","doi":"10.7202/1055486ar","title":"Le droit de la Cour interaméricaine des droits de l’homme : une obligation moderne pour le Canada","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013669377107270739,"score_gpt":0.25463420145589477,"score_spread":0.24096482434862404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913453585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88898975,0.0021972964,0.0010335245,0.03129646,0.00047100137,0.00051433576,0.00006330696,0.000100868296,0.07533343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9575767,0.0006884649,0.0020513115,0.0005850699,0.0006690081,0.00004977337,0.000027565746,0.000056420235,0.03829568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966101,0.0005859697,0.00050320895,0.00054312806,0.0004416307,0.0013159739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980412,0.00061869406,0.00030748636,0.00030364082,0.0002582631,0.00047068836],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010739841,0.00030798465,0.00059506623,0.00005448472,0.00082875544,0.00020424419,0.0006189925,0.00038916254,0.00013511455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005580066,0.00045030785,0.00023376367,0.00068525283,0.0006789903,0.0005121122,0.00015647577,0.0005942849,0.00013269881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009090822,0.00070531573,0.06820809,0.0009925414,0.00056374335,0.0003285311,0.064578325,0.010006711,0.006558271,0.8166576,0.014504386,0.016805569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038665193,0.00026187117,0.17446797,0.002018549,0.00037314554,0.00033059105,0.053918827,0.05484217,0.0033118734,0.60966784,0.09441662,0.0025240309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93281806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7500012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20698977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005116758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002892032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913495974","doi":"10.4324/9781315461731-26","title":"The ethics of indigenous rights","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Engineering; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.06743876809145344,"score_gpt":0.34281233481688855,"score_spread":0.2753735667254351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913495974","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024064103,0.0010012265,0.0000031152745,0.0022043118,0.0005392008,0.0003638757,0.000009273761,0.00005470956,0.99558365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0050025866,0.0017711701,0.00011791321,0.000114568546,0.0007165737,0.000004712691,0.0000022440856,0.00001151847,0.9922587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844515,0.00008188406,0.00025273248,0.00017849346,0.0007724186,0.00026931887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981661,0.00082268455,0.00024017556,0.00018734833,0.0005191401,0.000064576205],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090209395,0.00016881373,0.00024984154,0.000015913265,0.0030717626,0.0000557132,0.00046926012,0.00061261863,0.0014660168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002239209,0.000086227075,0.00015450975,0.000023345068,0.0024242208,0.000044514767,0.00011085969,0.00053109,0.0004131237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003613668,0.000004363617,0.0000065321665,0.000009363756,0.00012171235,0.0000011912782,0.14848536,2.7900288e-8,8.203915e-7,0.8373513,0.013028371,0.000987304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030485078,0.000024104993,0.000025727792,0.000030718224,0.000027428146,9.8660706e-8,0.0017482718,5.769347e-8,0.000011651131,0.11667418,0.88130045,0.00012684302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016940001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10639709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86827207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015780928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017933504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913857357","doi":"","title":"Le mariage des personnes de même sexe en droit constitutionnel comparé: Canada","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Annuaire international de justice constitutionnelle","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.015252291250486227,"score_gpt":0.2651851584211375,"score_spread":0.24993286717065127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913857357","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10202529,0.0045275055,0.0684168,0.12821719,0.015254498,0.0006571465,0.0004583762,0.000234119,0.6802091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730791,0.00091313967,0.0024656933,0.002536648,0.0031509965,0.00004679436,0.000058280966,0.000019517674,0.017729828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996456,0.000656552,0.0005914981,0.0005658574,0.00078674284,0.0009432933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99680346,0.001310132,0.00029096566,0.00021489528,0.0009331212,0.00044740504],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011067796,0.00041447047,0.00045274812,0.00008536598,0.0035822298,0.00019636302,0.0008457466,0.0003129932,0.0012729709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041719014,0.00045676169,0.00018293985,0.0003735882,0.006400837,0.0008751802,0.00022196892,0.00047783882,0.00026267898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027412001,0.00015201206,0.004257226,0.00014826213,0.00027933548,0.000060363654,0.018437764,0.0058500473,0.00011494657,0.91631967,0.052504387,0.001848563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011649765,0.0000509119,0.008405969,0.00055459887,0.0004972921,0.00015718864,0.084104605,0.012646396,0.000098232464,0.016751021,0.8747808,0.00078801025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8642744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8021623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8995687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003631606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038052814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914250502","doi":"10.15393/uchz.art.2019.271","title":"CANADIAN STRESS: FROM SPECIFICITY TO THE WHOLE LEXICON","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of Petrozavodsk State University","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexicon; Linguistics; Stress (linguistics); Natural language processing; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013701455003435978,"score_gpt":0.22535187664872544,"score_spread":0.21165042164528947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914250502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9028376,0.000028675051,0.0000029293606,0.01060121,0.00017448526,0.00035442237,0.00028587243,0.00004227373,0.08567253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864188,0.000069349575,0.00030981842,0.00009900312,0.00010373885,4.947167e-7,0.0000045456563,0.000006357687,0.012987899],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879116,0.000020938929,0.000111893656,0.0002795872,0.00038007676,0.00041635433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990572,0.00007282442,0.000107960834,0.00007508722,0.00040783113,0.00027910175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026537073,0.00012312074,0.00019283945,0.00008212015,0.0007700686,0.00007714552,0.00062062853,0.00006251912,0.0003219784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011907111,0.00010255182,0.00007655497,0.00040975146,0.00018619989,0.00038822627,0.00014783099,0.00016819208,0.000247942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014342203,0.00008822489,0.7117758,0.000044554236,0.00021158822,0.0000071764603,0.19957413,0.000058979036,0.0042549446,0.037998676,0.043765455,0.0020770603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002691363,0.000050307965,0.14306892,0.000038315804,0.000026249709,6.106435e-8,0.17242739,0.000013059859,0.00069217285,0.00042408388,0.68276304,0.00022728297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74658716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63335663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63899755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009200019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016182479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5922823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915998374","doi":"10.1017/cls.2019.1","title":"L’Esprit de l’ours contre la station de ski : l’argumentation juridique face à un conflit épistémologique et ontologique","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013675211598160132,"score_gpt":0.2810722004341452,"score_spread":0.26739698883598506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915998374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9038574,0.0066812932,0.00064690696,0.06424512,0.0011836063,0.0006316698,0.00032201837,0.000022246822,0.022409711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97389245,0.005450555,0.0021706598,0.008804891,0.00032536653,0.000017346292,0.00002725593,0.000038461385,0.009272983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99562746,0.0018244184,0.0006803844,0.00037711594,0.00018667006,0.0013039423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956107,0.0012523574,0.0007163307,0.0001592373,0.0005676424,0.0016937035],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048482027,0.00037819805,0.0007385137,0.00004452929,0.0010192395,0.000390363,0.00038916088,0.0008673416,0.00031748114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006195748,0.00041419038,0.00047858537,0.00022503166,0.0012921427,0.0007439004,0.000029442126,0.0013200657,0.0000074950317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013491221,0.000031395062,0.004801293,0.00016746772,0.00041805636,0.00017732549,0.25213274,0.00025070622,0.000084297484,0.7374195,0.0024987569,0.0020049708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028461302,0.00060325273,0.024650251,0.0007633046,0.00047299513,0.0005845019,0.26908433,0.00031225441,0.00012678723,0.0479768,0.6515102,0.0010692083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61351246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85390115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6894427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005785773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005098687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918395108","doi":"10.7202/1056407ar","title":"Pour en finir avec la Proclamation royale : la décision Côté","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proclamation; Humanities; Jurisprudence; Ethnology; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.013841563639518656,"score_gpt":0.2702164604370313,"score_spread":0.25637489679751263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918395108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76367074,0.0016515129,0.00011386014,0.014707667,0.00085485424,0.0007322134,0.000026091997,0.00012168397,0.2181214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78141946,0.0007933244,0.0015352584,0.00013827649,0.0009331999,0.000044487184,0.000014263309,0.000030218602,0.21509153],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971954,0.0008087205,0.0004082275,0.00047819433,0.0004391426,0.0006702788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979747,0.0011731886,0.00023513203,0.00026142722,0.00016403916,0.00019154375],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012718928,0.0002282243,0.00043852325,0.000048856833,0.00038447388,0.00017598199,0.0004216557,0.00054380967,0.0012276529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007768536,0.0002885633,0.00025506385,0.0003985871,0.00028957622,0.00046850578,0.00015811817,0.00048647565,0.0036913117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013440171,0.0009985339,0.09986063,0.0025647883,0.00046266092,0.00023573262,0.35320228,0.002821292,0.0028796343,0.27702478,0.05047809,0.20933716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016351542,0.00020944422,0.1708162,0.0017307098,0.00023262363,0.000073542586,0.012736745,0.008530126,0.00042301608,0.047345445,0.7549557,0.0013112683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019094399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054723426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7044776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010772883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001783278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919044450","doi":"10.7202/1056273ar","title":"Couvrez cette communauté que je ne saurais voir: Equity and Fault in the Division of Quebec’s Family Patrimony","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Misconduct; Statutory law; Discretion; Equity (law); Political science; Family law; Civil code; Common law; Partition (number theory); Sociology","score_opus":0.030670574588543158,"score_gpt":0.3115800032532794,"score_spread":0.2809094286647362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919044450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.970842,0.0010266457,0.00004750149,0.006445008,0.00015028619,0.00046440336,0.000023627634,0.000045859786,0.020954637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974727,0.00093871244,0.00022905167,0.00053574855,0.00028006398,0.000023240913,0.000006162396,0.00001049923,0.00050379586],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980098,0.00045957632,0.00034075466,0.00024539564,0.0004250053,0.0005194544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865687,0.0006346088,0.00018403279,0.000286634,0.0001520628,0.00008581242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016462721,0.00013252959,0.00033842467,0.000041622756,0.0006840762,0.00009911553,0.0006257917,0.00016513851,0.000023320783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074955553,0.0001225758,0.00010061351,0.00036254604,0.0009575442,0.00022676014,0.00038294395,0.0003086159,0.000023642888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010061602,0.00050041295,0.23057589,0.00028393927,0.000119853226,0.00003429115,0.5493264,0.000023157023,0.0038181064,0.04939041,0.010362934,0.155464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008924365,0.00017824373,0.91204524,0.0003383588,0.000051084906,0.000002535243,0.047221262,0.00027528327,0.00015504127,0.017184233,0.021248277,0.00040797453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16534632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23778795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6814694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034186238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000078291574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8402117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919656641","doi":"","title":"The Legal Treatment of Informal Caregivers of the Elderly in Canada and Australia: The Importance of Recognizing Relations in Creating Reforms","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"BC Cancer Agency; Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; University of Oxford; Department of Health, Western Cape Government; University of Toronto; McMaster University","keywords":"Legislation; Autonomy; Government (linguistics); Focus group; Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Nursing; Economic growth; Medicine; Business; Law","score_opus":0.020394083833920038,"score_gpt":0.28592948170242427,"score_spread":0.2655353978685042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919656641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827332,0.0005289841,1.9343856e-8,0.00031614455,0.00025087644,0.00051505456,0.000030564417,0.0000031156724,0.015622064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994929,0.00032907323,0.000036800015,0.000007115072,0.000047820882,0.00003757712,0.000014649195,0.000006029458,0.0045918897],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985215,0.000119049044,0.00055816234,0.00014150036,0.0004111665,0.0002486232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986656,0.00028536242,0.0006452842,0.00017918357,0.00018554505,0.00003903687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036917816,0.00014961974,0.00029459206,0.000019661768,0.00069060904,0.000028768174,0.00027548286,0.00012355347,0.000023035673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038256517,0.000072435214,0.000080325866,0.0002951043,0.0003992316,0.0002170776,0.00002710789,0.00022750525,4.7373612e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010555783,0.00003666367,0.8386194,0.00010404506,0.00018395216,0.0000027954193,0.14188565,0.00006349661,0.00006120532,0.014162783,0.00028972595,0.0044847247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042590176,0.00009588404,0.7352412,0.00034296943,0.000057078978,2.9596745e-7,0.25567305,0.000004786363,0.00040873393,0.0001697681,0.007434318,0.00014600984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99220294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99980587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1137874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008082736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077816646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5311676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921267321","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1366","title":"Recontextualizing Ktunaxa Nation v. British Columbia: Crown Land, History and Indigenous Religious Freedom","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Charter; Worship; Supreme court; Ceremony; State (computer science); Political science; Religious freedom; Law; Context (archaeology); Geography; Environmental ethics; Politics; Archaeology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03205819652791799,"score_gpt":0.274209235990027,"score_spread":0.242151039462109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921267321","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16843335,0.77393365,0.0000023473383,0.0019854235,0.0013687816,0.0023141373,0.000026051794,0.00021771155,0.051718548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45280328,0.5273242,0.00027736244,0.0036178173,0.00046029867,0.00011579034,0.000031174295,0.000038765935,0.0153313065],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980489,0.00029776042,0.0003854847,0.0003807415,0.00048401178,0.00040307187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902076,0.00014439989,0.00021080929,0.00018766904,0.00030084178,0.0001355529],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010800598,0.00013813454,0.0005110565,0.00001114807,0.00070827967,0.00021802398,0.00024371658,0.0001380873,0.00093415444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038264907,0.00017376964,0.0001258561,0.000124095,0.00037302027,0.00034834258,0.000086170905,0.00020798447,0.00020100562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001668824,0.00018997806,0.10235524,0.0057279505,0.00035784845,0.000070018905,0.050166257,0.0000015276274,0.00008309759,0.0070961374,0.75803775,0.07589753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025472578,0.000033297074,0.0028261766,0.0017167334,0.00006346168,0.000008201947,0.000530669,0.0000012211578,3.2961646e-7,0.00014226453,0.9941643,0.00025865546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4907131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6353246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28436992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074612035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012080057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921568756","doi":"10.7202/1056928ar","title":"L’inscription tardive du nom du père présumé à l’acte de naissance : quelques hésitations quant à la voie procédurale à suivre","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032415549891295234,"score_gpt":0.2693365559931597,"score_spread":0.23692100610186445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921568756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9162418,0.0068256636,0.00014771424,0.03823709,0.0018184272,0.00139268,0.00015545519,0.0002539343,0.034927193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655879,0.0053442908,0.0015319235,0.00046815854,0.0018392236,0.00018728602,0.00005665457,0.000055529905,0.024929011],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962848,0.00073402264,0.00056970865,0.00070157566,0.0004966272,0.0012133092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784863,0.0005400093,0.0004205077,0.00034134588,0.00047312194,0.00037638118],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010349213,0.00037470134,0.0006558281,0.000073256095,0.0013085601,0.00034965185,0.00056660845,0.0004983734,0.00056965085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087448634,0.00047958738,0.00041764654,0.000621499,0.00087232207,0.001182283,0.00016103603,0.0006105105,0.001555983],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113917886,0.0007646434,0.41191792,0.0016756504,0.0005889316,0.00019980641,0.21976359,0.0008844298,0.004743301,0.31417993,0.040051013,0.0051168436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015590054,0.00038197843,0.42522556,0.0018637282,0.00051729154,0.00013841657,0.04478245,0.0037770702,0.0004680164,0.019711513,0.49976864,0.001806335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0149903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005953403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45971763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020816266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029266876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921820358","doi":"10.21991/cf29376","title":"The Original Living Tree","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Supreme court; Constitutional interpretation; Doctrine; Order (exchange); Political science; Tree (set theory); Constitutional law; Judicial interpretation; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02095871892531076,"score_gpt":0.28926106029253557,"score_spread":0.2683023413672248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921820358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05308567,0.003776114,0.005058502,0.049199242,0.009636755,0.0019680015,0.00009655819,0.0006174569,0.8765617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889398,0.00035836123,0.00044357416,0.0007373772,0.00040932646,0.00009271447,0.000013897852,0.000008349274,0.008996586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676275,0.00019150578,0.00046980736,0.0004802219,0.00094973564,0.0011459967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976472,0.0011212187,0.0001943716,0.00032461493,0.0004534085,0.00025915724],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008979139,0.0003069387,0.0003030382,0.00007359707,0.008365836,0.00036686336,0.00066305377,0.0001999554,0.0009123587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012757137,0.00022094701,0.00028259185,0.000378216,0.0104198465,0.0008593322,0.00024223689,0.00037871965,0.0030908715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019482843,0.000039666436,0.060752627,0.000006034174,0.00007896191,0.000004672551,0.0005480943,0.0001099612,0.00005099109,0.926675,0.0098736035,0.0018408559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045663968,0.00003097809,0.0036560863,0.00010790212,0.00003336857,0.000023179799,0.015749453,0.00012282422,0.000019582083,0.007093341,0.97230864,0.00039800577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011074462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039292905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.962435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006921584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015408434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921868025","doi":"","title":"Arguing Indigenous Rights Outside Section 35: Can Religious Freedom Ground Indigenous Land Rights, and What Else Lies Ahead?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Supreme court; Law; Indigenous rights; Political science; Land rights; Right to property; Freedom of religion; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Sociology; Ethnology","score_opus":0.009783374898187302,"score_gpt":0.262680931211255,"score_spread":0.2528975563130677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921868025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97906303,0.017067252,0.0000803888,0.00081642193,0.0014553902,0.00044470822,0.0000031335471,0.00012658777,0.00094307895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970547,0.022996085,0.00009038918,0.000086550965,0.0042285193,0.00001258672,0.0000044531257,0.00002469239,0.0020096784],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99505734,0.00034530018,0.00042644923,0.00040792205,0.0006970492,0.0030659628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998789,0.00013342279,0.00032950565,0.00015820989,0.00032601377,0.00026384825],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017298764,0.00032842052,0.00039496992,0.00015028646,0.006957419,0.0010594383,0.00037178863,0.00027637268,0.000021283146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009159149,0.00024701032,0.00012852147,0.00033804402,0.0007870805,0.0012167946,0.00007686539,0.0016132491,0.000032340973],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021420835,0.00023356028,0.024123356,0.00002672805,0.001224401,0.00007641745,0.9235618,0.000017760947,0.00031869864,0.010525762,0.00066627865,0.03901101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033746064,0.0028149595,0.017265962,0.0003886058,0.00049159524,0.0012514744,0.2033821,0.000017952816,0.00034740227,0.64043915,0.1280869,0.0021393069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18166637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70329666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72017974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031531502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010650522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922039987","doi":"10.15353/lsuj.v3i0.432","title":"Redefining “Family” and Reconstructing Child Custody in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Politics; Legislation; Restructuring; Political science; Norm (philosophy); Nuclear family; Law; Family values; Sociology","score_opus":0.028710988561841018,"score_gpt":0.28606093228499874,"score_spread":0.2573499437231577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922039987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8991421,0.007894005,0.0000017465039,0.033127915,0.001882666,0.00022177305,0.0000026880855,0.000027694106,0.05769943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893515,0.008591573,0.00036249403,0.00049145945,0.00035966714,0.0000051562847,4.346935e-7,0.000013802751,0.00082387606],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975893,0.00028707276,0.0004962107,0.00029506412,0.00062127557,0.0007110948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989276,0.00035792906,0.00028315844,0.00008677958,0.00017004901,0.00017451993],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008235585,0.0002275551,0.0004940911,0.000071539274,0.0019635381,0.00018719604,0.00020114316,0.00006095382,0.00002295782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055565266,0.00018472147,0.00006951152,0.00033356875,0.0002771242,0.00047289653,0.00016414809,0.0007862511,0.000011999563],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069873306,0.00004009,0.8912112,0.000092896844,0.00081473665,0.00027067016,0.040156234,0.00034192266,0.000102254045,0.026477879,0.012893196,0.02752906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023628816,0.00010538701,0.12570694,0.0008021281,0.000080983904,0.00022466487,0.6473449,0.00010722163,0.000020469442,0.0044347597,0.21778324,0.0010264363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85447186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95827127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76550424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002226127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057448907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922135310","doi":"10.7202/1056820ar","title":"Divorcer et ne plus vouloir tenir lieu de père","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.01966394015669898,"score_gpt":0.2802877954028486,"score_spread":0.2606238552461496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922135310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.817393,0.007932162,0.00006386583,0.042555086,0.0020326725,0.0008157352,0.00006365139,0.0001796797,0.12896416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80619746,0.0032482145,0.0011104015,0.0016040688,0.0015789522,0.000049640752,0.000015626687,0.000049460425,0.1861462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996598,0.00043878768,0.0004470411,0.0006215336,0.00048286215,0.0014117475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983683,0.00038576752,0.00025195917,0.00039315748,0.00017168072,0.00042909296],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090531504,0.00032072625,0.0006668304,0.000048525228,0.00059755496,0.00019720999,0.0006440877,0.00053945795,0.001699462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003736485,0.00040929078,0.00041734273,0.000569374,0.00060454616,0.0005463238,0.0002837054,0.00070759916,0.0039024663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016348621,0.0006545786,0.17633873,0.0020566236,0.0009769181,0.00036417614,0.31950825,0.003448208,0.0029567177,0.39850315,0.05296181,0.04206736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020928003,0.0003003991,0.11004892,0.0012542929,0.00039741295,0.00008080424,0.027575513,0.003357239,0.00028510377,0.024689175,0.82808614,0.0018321867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015325193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036803137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7751243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025821775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002942381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922225905","doi":"","title":"LA COUR SUPREME DU CANADA ET LA TRADITION DU DROIT CIVIL","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Jurisprudence; Public law","score_opus":0.03181982028567717,"score_gpt":0.2732602105662148,"score_spread":0.24144039028053763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922225905","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011044825,0.233041,0.0000012192558,0.5114233,0.000921969,0.0007948652,0.00017058362,0.00002697064,0.24257526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6403441,0.3370778,0.000008204148,0.01437116,0.0006078625,0.000042481133,0.00002041567,0.000019250729,0.007508729],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963938,0.0018252049,0.00033938303,0.00026725716,0.00051308144,0.000661288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828416,0.0005190374,0.00014330447,0.00023889783,0.0001577061,0.0006568783],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021754017,0.00026374217,0.00045586823,0.000017923114,0.0014738888,0.0001253153,0.00054259645,0.0001495471,0.0030503122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006968681,0.00020347179,0.00016896357,0.0004816373,0.00071631995,0.00020934912,0.000030560495,0.0004339948,0.00026483074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017463819,0.000024097408,0.0015737264,0.0006609399,0.00014123207,0.0003787738,0.005885087,0.0000071546924,5.113518e-7,0.35281718,0.59963644,0.038873125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010744727,0.00001021592,0.011081353,0.0014428897,0.0001777069,0.000084015766,0.0008240855,0.0000094818715,1.4672406e-7,0.0004891798,0.9855016,0.0002719035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9985377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99993706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6292993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030695933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003634833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922453220","doi":"10.21991/cf29378","title":"The Constitution of Canada as Supreme Law: A New Definition","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.024256995596565196,"score_gpt":0.26270637281413517,"score_spread":0.23844937721756998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922453220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02373245,0.0023550943,0.0024848718,0.033478387,0.0055290014,0.001750584,0.00022892193,0.00018913815,0.93025154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948686,0.00022160255,0.00039467512,0.0012302147,0.00020172834,0.000047040812,0.00005745285,0.0000065606546,0.0029721383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644274,0.0001704928,0.0006998724,0.00044567868,0.001249451,0.0009917689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975409,0.00070513145,0.00034646588,0.0003406074,0.00070823263,0.00035868865],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060661236,0.00032216805,0.00039884288,0.00006002144,0.0051594647,0.00014723155,0.00053908443,0.00021541734,0.0006084815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012799934,0.00025418797,0.00023019832,0.00041491326,0.010786135,0.0007238335,0.00016719483,0.00031616088,0.00028336298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006788054,0.000035165605,0.0062739183,0.000013197081,0.000107003754,0.0000059563426,0.00031413132,0.00028166888,0.00017215496,0.97659075,0.015834086,0.00030406236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012470619,0.000052582403,0.0005868599,0.00015815513,0.000059271275,0.000041815176,0.012142515,0.00004051748,0.00048866845,0.07051747,0.914203,0.00046210893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5521918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7103733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97113615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011187053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012721272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922454360","doi":"","title":"Finding Solutions for the Legislative Gaps in Determining Rights to the Family Home on Colonially Defined Indigenous Lands","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freehold; Indigenous; Legislation; Legislature; Land rights; Land tenure; Land law; Law; Family law; Political science; Geography; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Environmental planning; Ecology","score_opus":0.11302889733125822,"score_gpt":0.3251509411412067,"score_spread":0.21212204380994848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922454360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9606392,0.00007113784,0.0014831504,0.0072218105,0.00011533977,0.0017133509,0.00022603576,0.000043759508,0.028486244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99373674,0.00038174234,0.0011046788,0.000039164068,0.00007309725,0.0000018169817,0.000009833103,0.0000065690833,0.00464634],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696237,0.0008631999,0.00010567849,0.00036691138,0.0007734963,0.0009283543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957734,0.003357731,0.00009758077,0.0002485779,0.0003332322,0.00018952617],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014824843,0.0001470482,0.00025956417,0.00037431248,0.012547543,0.00003306955,0.0012632901,0.00009231776,0.000034201767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000380899,0.00012079653,0.0001692885,0.0010641495,0.0019349817,0.00027155975,0.0006218964,0.00052617356,0.00004787324],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001060073,0.00022091274,0.014982057,0.000018819144,0.00022775345,0.00022252007,0.9449458,0.0006863542,0.0005372729,0.024517559,0.009812803,0.0027680413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018304634,0.0006554367,0.3307848,0.00009711207,0.000043863743,0.0000022828153,0.19537641,0.00050893286,0.00000939318,0.0009909611,0.46936443,0.00033589583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066238664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21294817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7495694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006862155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046771156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.988738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922812838","doi":"","title":"LE DROIT A L'EGALITE: INTERFACE ENTRE DROITS INDIVIDUELS ET DROITS COLLECTIFS","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Context (archaeology); Democracy; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Constitutional court; Balance (ability); Sociology; Human rights; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.024654759271849094,"score_gpt":0.29872499166880034,"score_spread":0.2740702323969513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922812838","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044862726,0.42828897,9.1026243e-7,0.32237703,0.00055496814,0.0016287343,0.00018989133,0.000051160958,0.24242209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33182645,0.3061782,0.000059910974,0.01901107,0.0004416983,0.00014282772,0.000023564939,0.00005681974,0.34225947],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99522406,0.0015815196,0.0006458521,0.0005634192,0.0006641183,0.0013210475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783844,0.0002681325,0.00021519374,0.0004972366,0.00021144304,0.0009695658],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018987056,0.00046062155,0.00084703276,0.00005072076,0.002798208,0.0003357155,0.0011773376,0.00026819506,0.017617185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005129324,0.0003824848,0.00038031064,0.0015136483,0.0012224632,0.00043618158,0.00009095842,0.0007295029,0.0050872844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000780189,0.00008439244,0.00021929407,0.0014443082,0.00046689916,0.00006234975,0.040450074,0.000025075075,0.000002411821,0.37164038,0.41503274,0.17056428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022918104,0.000038817303,0.0008410792,0.0040851757,0.00026272508,0.000021342712,0.0009733584,0.0000081609305,0.0000055549217,0.0018562512,0.9911916,0.0004867065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.821995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9481547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5761589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022003537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026098033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2923593692","doi":"10.29173/alr2530","title":"Supreme Court of Canada Cases Strengthen Argument for Municipal Obligation to Discharge Duty to Consult: Time to Put Neskonlith to Rest","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"First Quantum Minerals (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Indigenous; Treaty; Argument (complex analysis); Supreme court; Duty; Obligation; Rest (music); Government (linguistics); Abandonment (legal); Political science; High Court","score_opus":0.03251796229619488,"score_gpt":0.31378313895966287,"score_spread":0.281265176663468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2923593692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76383555,0.0041344627,0.0000035834332,0.19311292,0.00055639417,0.01354593,0.00047274499,0.00004087796,0.024297543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9456188,0.0008254941,0.0011452786,0.01713035,0.00022581138,0.0008723725,0.000073316754,0.00003786993,0.034070704],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793553,0.0001595185,0.0004822592,0.0003838783,0.0005232672,0.0005155656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780715,0.00089392974,0.00012320504,0.00034480507,0.00034375998,0.00048715316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005701128,0.0002118129,0.00061060546,0.000019709541,0.00036644263,0.000042858974,0.00041308656,0.000046281308,0.00063759653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002356247,0.00016342274,0.00010063561,0.0003971264,0.000047385704,0.00012168001,0.0001692706,0.000058767015,0.0005210372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002848735,0.00043276203,0.0055521666,0.004477582,0.00064652984,0.00000842407,0.0765925,0.00029803754,0.001682887,0.17196454,0.72638404,0.011675645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014244634,0.0001451505,0.0009765303,0.0014098239,0.00006314517,4.3343206e-7,0.0005478615,0.0000049083164,0.00010229966,0.000011719441,0.99633265,0.00026305838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9079337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97311157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26994857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044611562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021492701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6981235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2924529733","doi":"","title":"Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench Rule 20A: history of the law regarding civil money judgment and mortgage enforcement","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Mspace (University of Manitoba)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Queen (butterfly); Political science; Law enforcement; Enforcement; Summary judgment; Economics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.024856404077907342,"score_gpt":0.22467195483878608,"score_spread":0.19981555076087873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2924529733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80298,0.0011097349,0.0000061790984,0.0006001458,0.0009870632,0.00072109496,0.000038638464,0.000031055482,0.1935261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98080784,0.001261677,0.00019311086,0.000020388992,0.000053856562,0.000001522944,0.000025802972,0.000014582094,0.017621223],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983194,0.00017292362,0.00020107381,0.00028630643,0.0007576538,0.0002626393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845785,0.000068534195,0.0007833535,0.0002517581,0.00035693726,0.00008156721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003708018,0.0002217102,0.000506507,0.000072849674,0.0006139346,0.000008862912,0.0005215425,0.00025345638,0.00006331821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045262765,0.00021458161,0.0002327789,0.0001164564,0.0008118661,0.0002173411,0.00019930328,0.00025178268,0.0000038294156],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071364717,0.00083762856,0.13271658,0.0038674634,0.0027823043,0.000041162275,0.5397747,0.00006324332,0.0042952183,0.17947781,0.13361333,0.0018169073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007007125,0.000100081954,0.18837513,0.000552543,0.0006172519,2.5071154e-7,0.7193648,0.00001000901,0.0005788403,0.00030924083,0.088963576,0.00042753032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4061399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8982909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49215093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001009349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016563103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87503844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2925102901","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1344","title":"Constitutional Cases 2016: An Overview","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Constitution; Constitutional law; Political science; Law; Constitutional court; Supreme Court Decisions; Set (abstract data type); Constitutional right; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.18330509882943144,"score_gpt":0.4246887779126451,"score_spread":0.24138367908321365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2925102901","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016397451,0.68691444,0.000009872648,0.035683665,0.0011665241,0.0014084498,0.00008947213,0.00019048766,0.27289733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40306628,0.5893793,0.00041088066,0.0040340754,0.0008255845,0.00008909402,0.00002315113,0.000009575976,0.0021620528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982889,0.00026439133,0.0002759268,0.00028750283,0.0005209964,0.00036226024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867845,0.000110167915,0.00021632717,0.00048465625,0.00030300918,0.00020740883],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009828638,0.00017019571,0.00041684642,0.000004545183,0.0041038715,0.00023206415,0.0006651563,0.000074118776,0.0016585077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012012655,0.0001284083,0.00017327393,0.000048311707,0.002852781,0.00086505973,0.00014206435,0.00013054935,0.00052986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018590902,0.00004114356,0.00065275107,0.00044779966,0.00003599036,0.000022427503,0.00033126824,1.3016061e-7,0.000004468679,0.9674338,0.024410376,0.0066179894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010820045,0.000016656426,0.0011580347,0.0019859227,0.00007998905,0.0000057771254,0.00010642769,5.645955e-7,0.0000036637239,0.0007307103,0.9956021,0.00020197984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01704835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013171685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9711917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013917261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015512946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2932821575","doi":"10.1353/esc.2001.0030","title":"Robert Browning’s Language by Donald S. Hair","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English studies in Canada","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Admiration; Context (archaeology); History; Pace; Sociology; Literature; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Art; Archaeology; Geography","score_opus":0.019334563051692306,"score_gpt":0.30129875263273576,"score_spread":0.28196418958104347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2932821575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8341261,0.0293935,0.0000012676179,0.009836137,0.003444519,0.00037346405,0.000036412355,0.00013548418,0.12265312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875884,0.002857241,0.00006565601,0.00097357377,0.00058965984,0.00004998882,0.0000051004017,0.000011569293,0.007858832],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981254,0.00013938769,0.00024494136,0.00028080726,0.000603752,0.0006057554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990758,0.0004117288,0.00007105353,0.00012587773,0.00019860471,0.00011693678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034313602,0.00017712008,0.000315173,0.000023513665,0.0007015912,0.000030940093,0.0002912564,0.000054113156,0.00015351234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020128388,0.00015291179,0.000045004832,0.00038734268,0.00033280734,0.00016507728,0.00013897844,0.00022954939,0.000004946899],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062057948,0.000018253804,0.057394944,0.000012999554,0.000095924064,0.00010165186,0.15701684,0.000027691873,0.0000076274805,0.0002135322,0.7823107,0.002793588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021679267,0.0000065454133,0.004028319,0.000028598999,0.0000075590606,3.0826016e-7,0.2779536,0.000002349625,0.000017381102,0.000022591088,0.71752274,0.00019323263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99946636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15346229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029423954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037989806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76942617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936681040","doi":"","title":"The Call in Carter to Interpret Freedom of Conscience","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Charter; Law; Dignity; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Political science; Freedom of religion; Scholarship; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.011397055751235485,"score_gpt":0.30487327066428727,"score_spread":0.29347621491305176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936681040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9678387,0.0017255568,0.00041962523,0.014875607,0.00070870353,0.00026448086,0.0000018815921,0.000016245347,0.01414922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971902,0.0009465977,0.00005076307,0.00011995737,0.00032033125,0.000004372491,5.4786252e-8,0.0000036330143,0.0013641054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764687,0.00018322635,0.00022197327,0.00011801087,0.00036159,0.0014683147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938095,0.00018286447,0.00006810932,0.00008412757,0.00020659936,0.00007736721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002705382,0.00007392091,0.0001227207,0.000034399138,0.0008672355,0.000065873566,0.0005182468,0.000041580057,0.0000190269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007915612,0.000044741875,0.000056907716,0.0002983637,0.0009155048,0.00013364042,0.000066852386,0.0005614805,0.000029999277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015946262,0.00009934935,0.044629678,0.0000037167902,0.00017076558,0.000003869441,0.27643833,0.000018203415,0.004017271,0.6028951,0.005489547,0.06607473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019008598,0.0024202701,0.04841301,0.00023410982,0.00006358572,0.00006202787,0.4324343,0.0001456802,0.0009827283,0.20520109,0.30717748,0.0009648746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075197574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2876837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39769402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008721676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088328606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2937180997","doi":"","title":"SECTION 9 AND SECOND FAMILIES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Underemployment; Spouse; Section (typography); Unemployment; Argument (complex analysis); Relevance (law); Scale (ratio); Child support; Economics; Sociology; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Public economics; Political science; Law; Economic growth; Business; Geography; Medicine","score_opus":0.0689438864642507,"score_gpt":0.3153809800479768,"score_spread":0.24643709358372612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2937180997","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041357208,0.40173662,5.855191e-7,0.17714481,0.00076720794,0.0011482855,0.000017951275,0.00006396734,0.37776336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85170954,0.11991415,0.000049710354,0.011518705,0.0006845662,0.00005119371,0.000003922724,0.000011169616,0.016057031],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931866,0.00018224836,0.000082601655,0.0000857587,0.00013731286,0.00019341214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947995,0.000034127235,0.000028759072,0.00008052621,0.000084015395,0.00029261876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007777912,0.00005977981,0.00012270185,0.000011222498,0.0008006692,0.000050746046,0.00011342319,0.000034028584,0.000270551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003883617,0.000036905887,0.0000262581,0.00012655224,0.0002503026,0.00008762413,0.00001615616,0.00008442565,0.00011414099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018153747,0.000005179453,0.0036462604,0.00051740283,0.00007083683,0.000008143656,0.06327782,6.029465e-7,0.0000031513093,0.061278258,0.7937862,0.0774043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003275171,0.0000049261303,0.0029465507,0.00011320986,0.00001704573,0.0000012589693,0.0024212282,4.5285157e-7,4.022153e-7,0.00022980968,0.99417347,0.000058919362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5982376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9723529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8103523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034253593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024555167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6158181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2938056349","doi":"10.1515/9780773597549-006","title":"The Royal Proclamation of 1763 and the Aboriginal Constitution","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proclamation; Constitution; Honour; Parallels; Law; Supreme court; Political science; History; Engineering","score_opus":0.023020691083907436,"score_gpt":0.25649377859793615,"score_spread":0.2334730875140287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2938056349","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000033885302,0.00003039766,0.000011779721,0.0010568384,0.00019501949,0.00082200527,0.000086426815,0.00005863094,0.99770504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028857216,0.0005576032,0.000041560103,0.00002194589,0.00013009933,0.0000031605011,0.0000067843052,0.000008729931,0.9703729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986062,0.00020209212,0.00018237831,0.00023317787,0.00055850536,0.00021764959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985726,0.00028506297,0.00035030706,0.0001748392,0.0005287719,0.000088455185],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005507586,0.0002066055,0.00029723742,0.000029897112,0.0023974108,0.00005542574,0.00035215035,0.00024516037,0.0000058584164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008119588,0.00012956692,0.000113746435,0.000011916291,0.0036444627,0.00009906075,0.000166766,0.00029533354,0.0000028270658],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013630057,0.000003128923,0.000004300225,0.000021092072,0.00011362212,0.0000041030157,0.0024907875,0.000010318133,2.565759e-7,0.99418986,0.002245181,0.00078104914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068962976,0.000019579044,0.000017793322,0.00006841589,0.00019233332,2.2237029e-7,0.0014128691,0.000012854509,0.000007540618,0.0018896793,0.9955245,0.00016457899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016810978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000096378666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99327934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034465338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013264305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99906707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2938869735","doi":"10.7202/1058571ar","title":"Le calcul des aliments du parent de fait : de l’approche synchronique à l’approche étapiste","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016397984078295312,"score_gpt":0.25904316333735866,"score_spread":0.24264517925906334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2938869735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92083627,0.0068630595,0.005222985,0.009110797,0.000570279,0.0009574987,0.00003796729,0.0001891282,0.05621202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91870123,0.0020275598,0.0061589284,0.0009646747,0.00053581875,0.00016695305,0.000018682276,0.00006021872,0.07136596],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567443,0.00069184956,0.0004643597,0.0006882361,0.0006070717,0.0018740367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983175,0.00030951676,0.00026838272,0.00031754974,0.00018541525,0.00060167984],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013414463,0.000488443,0.0005890698,0.000051906278,0.0016722863,0.00023428367,0.0007464323,0.0009190113,0.00032845986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043891312,0.0005082631,0.0003975961,0.00047047503,0.0029835233,0.00041744625,0.00019647992,0.00093676685,0.00036669092],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011634726,0.00080055307,0.079523236,0.001323054,0.0013686132,0.00013934581,0.50291216,0.0007234251,0.005709854,0.36351877,0.013101875,0.030762779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030395251,0.00048300123,0.046470117,0.0010666682,0.0007709041,0.00011358033,0.2274221,0.0026266861,0.0072327284,0.06923367,0.6387879,0.0027530955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025564905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036042964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62568605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008318572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006619901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939088570","doi":"","title":"A Conversation with the Honorable Rosalie Silberman Abella and Dean Matthew Diller","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem; University of Toronto; Gruber Foundation; Northwestern University","keywords":"Conversation; Shalom; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Psychology; Art; Political science; Theology; Philosophy; Communication","score_opus":0.016965320891882168,"score_gpt":0.26746028534572075,"score_spread":0.25049496445383856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2939088570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91336864,0.00043493728,0.000023198309,0.018838089,0.00022059101,0.00052115036,0.0000060912207,0.00012936966,0.06645793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99139863,0.00008732665,0.0002441737,0.0014192129,0.0004883378,0.00002854576,0.000002684293,0.000012876285,0.006318182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987633,0.00016728738,0.00012184837,0.0002456674,0.0003471682,0.00035468282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999305,0.00013035409,0.00008795179,0.00016721644,0.00015864485,0.00015080297],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041706144,0.00014158258,0.0001554078,0.000011032286,0.001903184,0.00025183737,0.00020597171,0.00007761981,0.000457743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007442728,0.00008334576,0.000034206598,0.00017004607,0.001347046,0.00032220432,0.00007537689,0.00014797403,0.00040804225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027659663,0.00019060083,0.13530864,0.00009786562,0.0005911248,0.000020300971,0.28102708,0.000021316999,0.0019417239,0.43950853,0.13609114,0.004925082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008150252,0.00013501814,0.035914317,0.000049226477,0.00007103124,0.0000021633036,0.022555191,0.000031581872,0.00055360876,0.001038862,0.9384432,0.00039079908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028363941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063204445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.802352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010687796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004232272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939799394","doi":"","title":"Famille structurelle, famille fonctionnelle : réflexion sur le travail prétorien d'adaptation de la notion de famille à travers la jurisprudence de la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme et de la Cour suprême du Canada","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Toulouse 1 Capitole Publications (Université Toulouse I Capitole)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009798009667018331,"score_gpt":0.24437996439636223,"score_spread":0.2345819547293439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2939799394","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95649785,0.0016618372,0.0069198995,0.002523133,0.0008285545,0.0011900968,0.00043688022,0.0005818918,0.02935984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9576887,0.008691791,0.006296911,0.00033283344,0.00085843925,0.00019701544,0.00069849024,0.00024276393,0.024993058],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.988849,0.0053341626,0.00093255175,0.001430632,0.0014414854,0.0020122023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924607,0.002798699,0.0011130598,0.00078472594,0.0016712677,0.0011715331],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032310034,0.0011840471,0.0010039307,0.00054337166,0.0051678945,0.0008792458,0.0017212909,0.0019461658,0.000314042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017618627,0.0014242511,0.0005041917,0.002018921,0.0022879532,0.0015209175,0.00023724351,0.0017157347,0.000048178306],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045229465,0.0015226799,0.010528617,0.00054851826,0.0011169324,0.00023617354,0.6918118,0.014615692,0.0100782495,0.21193431,0.04820806,0.008946687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003690615,0.0002535107,0.28020486,0.0003554892,0.0010301921,0.00030405703,0.39488322,0.016506933,0.0010693609,0.004247899,0.2950588,0.0023951088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8037878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.552892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29692858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011764204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013843991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940980653","doi":"","title":"MAID in Canada?: Debating the Constitutionality of Canada’s New Medical Assistance in Dying Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Supreme court; Parliament; Political science; Legislature; Criminal law; Criminal code; Constitutional law; Constitutional court; Framing (construction); Context (archaeology); Constitution; Sociology; Politics; History","score_opus":0.016702537314955784,"score_gpt":0.28463357430374125,"score_spread":0.26793103698878545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940980653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92617625,0.0024657596,0.00009281662,0.047998026,0.00048535713,0.00016768703,0.000002560355,0.0000058390906,0.022605699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998754,0.00025309666,0.000025868148,0.0004217112,0.00028048691,0.0000016090851,2.6618582e-7,0.0000027460305,0.00026017704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969856,0.00027025724,0.00034005445,0.00011053218,0.000953072,0.001340493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993131,0.00025043625,0.00015416506,0.000055739853,0.00011218912,0.00011434238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029313713,0.00007978415,0.00016633856,0.000012833121,0.00080500485,0.000021780892,0.00034584003,0.000045534547,0.00008909568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010487882,0.000055270582,0.000025342697,0.00022045644,0.00048230842,0.000102723374,0.000035081517,0.0009954381,4.7647612e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000171824,0.000011327567,0.094077736,0.0000030576466,0.000040760297,0.000009873123,0.0034740602,0.000026205737,0.000016175289,0.89946294,0.0007607429,0.0020999385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037577595,0.00013950712,0.40937608,0.00070888986,0.000052807405,0.00013392084,0.28826624,0.00044359494,0.00019333254,0.14676645,0.14909872,0.0010627018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75269645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011720371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.106854685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9920735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941032125","doi":"10.29173/psur77","title":"The Duty Consult as the Authority to Recognize","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Undergraduate Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Treaty; Sovereignty; Presumption; Duty; Law; Political science; Mandate; Federalist; Politics; State (computer science); Territorial integrity; Indigenous rights; Power (physics); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05269967748426617,"score_gpt":0.3927453424956485,"score_spread":0.34004566501138234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941032125","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01028931,0.009214663,0.00001021669,0.78664005,0.0008920171,0.0019869711,0.000005004562,0.00010071589,0.19086106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9467387,0.02921286,0.00014997028,0.015975004,0.00023270102,0.00009910025,5.7219034e-7,0.000009181279,0.007581886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951454,0.00064596714,0.00039725477,0.00050116703,0.0015164255,0.0017938343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99619126,0.0018424271,0.00010057419,0.00047590255,0.00053835893,0.0008514711],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006518222,0.00019483264,0.00033661304,0.000019277722,0.0044472422,0.00044767276,0.0014960383,0.000052991156,0.00017657992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015724542,0.00008895137,0.00016619418,0.001558096,0.0036883834,0.0002943586,0.00038277058,0.0003208531,0.0044019287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017685961,0.0000142409435,0.00039048787,0.000053228694,0.000008698422,6.9954933e-7,0.0005996588,1.1826542e-7,0.000016659951,0.9843863,0.0033077695,0.011220362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008411569,0.000044796274,0.004604642,0.0004625114,0.000044953555,0.0000037466789,0.0023603905,0.000009007747,0.000033653072,0.065782405,0.92631483,0.00025494432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008480751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012974392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9364494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069059257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006562898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941607365","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1347","title":"Daniels v. Canada: Reflections on Constitutional Technique","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Supreme court; Constitution; Law; Originalism; Certainty; Constitutional interpretation; Constitutional law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10593349318229006,"score_gpt":0.3992322901122735,"score_spread":0.29329879692998345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941607365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008184135,0.011212432,0.00008894541,0.06312058,0.00073100236,0.0020234273,0.00005421354,0.0001122156,0.92257535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9356458,0.04419612,0.0010533722,0.010347401,0.00089435483,0.0009518103,0.000017695977,0.0000166321,0.006876795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986096,0.00014749501,0.00021443087,0.00022783584,0.0005070772,0.00029355413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902946,0.000088088265,0.00015883958,0.0003513492,0.00024473344,0.00012751354],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005936965,0.00013466034,0.0002786304,0.0000069595626,0.0047733076,0.00009350218,0.00046589412,0.00006664132,0.0004200504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009434767,0.000106490406,0.000095568445,0.00006354494,0.0014349994,0.0002030956,0.000079121804,0.00019929813,0.00006554304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013023966,0.000018437433,0.00012365707,0.00011369444,0.000025906387,0.000007005028,0.00010492577,3.9731728e-7,0.00003446877,0.9291252,0.0699073,0.00053772057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005542832,0.000010537187,0.000448787,0.001254634,0.000030348285,0.0000020517027,0.000059605674,1.195766e-7,0.000051986543,0.00064200273,0.997298,0.00014652585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7134693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90994775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.935564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060329615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068436976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99652237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942669476","doi":"10.7202/1058513ar","title":"La dévolution légale des successions selon le Code civil du Québec","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018245885679092053,"score_gpt":0.2628403857381496,"score_spread":0.24459450005905756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942669476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8618101,0.008345188,0.0000974331,0.021531183,0.0010762643,0.0004485836,0.000048943242,0.00015376475,0.10648853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92544454,0.0029408988,0.0004788312,0.0001515377,0.000838147,0.00004438624,0.000012839732,0.00003484121,0.07005399],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973302,0.00059666537,0.00037921872,0.0004869038,0.00034381732,0.0008632287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856377,0.00044822288,0.00022495218,0.00026909774,0.00020148096,0.00029245546],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008151382,0.00023537339,0.00045174742,0.000044011136,0.001483201,0.00013416447,0.00045997594,0.00040812918,0.0012994641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000468518,0.00030337623,0.00028816026,0.0005379617,0.0012924294,0.00067898893,0.00018257966,0.00045412782,0.0017229781],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005856911,0.0008395182,0.68746257,0.001180902,0.00033370426,0.00009303074,0.1479234,0.00045690595,0.0048459694,0.09322003,0.034062363,0.029523028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014232004,0.00018887395,0.25687125,0.0016434675,0.00027857738,0.0000831018,0.048535734,0.0025650456,0.0007739971,0.013491888,0.6727935,0.0013513422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2612673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3990422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6387311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002319852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061096356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942745695","doi":"","title":"L'UNION HOMOSEXUELLE ET LE CODE CIVIL DU QUEBEC: DE L'IGNORANCE A LA RECONNAISSANCE?","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Legislature; Ignorance; Silence; Political science; Law; Legislation; Civil law (Civil law); Civil liberties; Sociology; Public law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.053597448072913764,"score_gpt":0.2911875712746566,"score_spread":0.23759012320174283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942745695","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00058857107,0.46067277,0.000004893335,0.42993197,0.00036047187,0.00063992734,0.00004251205,0.000027190817,0.107731715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.340517,0.58441925,0.00007748261,0.016841847,0.0004568935,0.00013971407,0.00000508516,0.00003094753,0.057511736],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567163,0.0024785814,0.0003625069,0.0003354574,0.00028860325,0.0008632494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843955,0.00030859836,0.00018512373,0.00035490128,0.0001467802,0.0005650306],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025725716,0.00029070248,0.0005226223,0.000021617778,0.0021713648,0.0001786385,0.00069218193,0.00018240497,0.0044132667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006891198,0.00022653883,0.0002306024,0.0005796354,0.0014047623,0.000325226,0.00005589416,0.00047987883,0.0013545232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.8390826e-7,0.000043137068,0.00041026023,0.0008718465,0.0000769186,0.00004370651,0.016538218,0.000005632748,0.000002512923,0.16438335,0.6819091,0.13571455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015573895,0.000013956279,0.0011235242,0.0030087873,0.00009403512,0.00001786668,0.0013644366,0.000063445696,0.0000020349978,0.00043917916,0.9934079,0.00030909068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91900134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99635005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4130901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013361218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006724486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942848434","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1086","title":"Sovereignty and Canadian-Nigerian Human Rights Engagements: Some Theoretical Reflections","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Human rights; Power (physics); Politics; State (computer science); Political science; Popular sovereignty; Law; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Law and economics; Political economy","score_opus":0.03865991025708563,"score_gpt":0.35197166543502506,"score_spread":0.3133117551779394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942848434","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17011777,0.014488526,0.000008365396,0.09233715,0.00068860047,0.005084658,0.00011933545,0.00024707615,0.7169085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940602,0.0005835972,0.000043331653,0.0010143453,0.00022309054,0.00006921587,0.000038079892,0.000009816807,0.0039582816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997755,0.0006253143,0.00033862807,0.00030700534,0.0005763625,0.0003976854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991496,0.00020542007,0.000079829275,0.00019676426,0.00015923854,0.00020914117],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011009044,0.00019793677,0.00031392844,0.00005156893,0.0067442376,0.00010499141,0.0003770184,0.0000855201,0.011501823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017916293,0.00011331384,0.00013792218,0.000190492,0.0009371308,0.00032759036,0.000021873746,0.00030147427,0.00014948807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011362573,0.000021454565,0.000015954329,0.00007801013,0.00007127226,0.0000012793886,0.0019650063,5.440578e-7,0.000013329554,0.9969939,0.0007946368,0.000043486987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019410494,0.00002142577,0.0015821198,0.00014097734,0.00008642262,0.0000010536711,0.00008739003,0.0000010108387,0.00000697792,0.523668,0.47402972,0.00018080564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023992788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2762019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8239425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030934365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006096042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99454886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943177021","doi":"10.7202/1058486ar","title":"La jouissance et l’exercice des droits civils : nouvelle version","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.016932783130279707,"score_gpt":0.2728444298784215,"score_spread":0.2559116467481418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943177021","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7342193,0.0064666034,0.000030173334,0.0050859526,0.0011579726,0.00047125024,0.00004075998,0.000101804915,0.2524262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9005165,0.008319849,0.00093235174,0.00033301883,0.0005609497,0.000024864705,0.0000116629,0.00003904078,0.08926177],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687713,0.00063376524,0.00037376853,0.0005855441,0.00049164915,0.001038143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982874,0.000615235,0.000238878,0.00033295382,0.00020909417,0.00031643294],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001241476,0.00027953563,0.0005502684,0.00004919771,0.00076476915,0.00016323593,0.0005657126,0.00048255947,0.0017822824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038256557,0.00037949719,0.00030465363,0.00067625334,0.0009328484,0.0007557141,0.00023412862,0.0006241272,0.004297777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001611432,0.0010100928,0.17373608,0.0031769515,0.0006672989,0.00032979043,0.38479358,0.0011454915,0.005617062,0.31916872,0.039678767,0.07051501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017631561,0.00033142453,0.16998711,0.0031338527,0.0003598557,0.0000652609,0.0480022,0.0009921802,0.0008824367,0.027739318,0.7450079,0.0017353484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008858589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002742304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70532906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001449151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014986808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943399140","doi":"10.7202/1058451ar","title":"Further Reflections on Spousal and Child Support After Pelech, Caron and Richardson","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Law; Premise; Certainty; Statute; Relevance (law); Diversity (politics); Child support; Trilogy; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; History; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01542281050107032,"score_gpt":0.2837914656036168,"score_spread":0.2683686551025465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943399140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8984223,0.00023423218,0.0000018999714,0.004272556,0.00016990976,0.00031928896,0.000011486653,0.00006447354,0.09650387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989914,0.000437148,0.00011970137,0.00035148236,0.00035533877,0.000031584317,0.0000026533057,0.000014199048,0.008773877],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990223,0.000070579816,0.00011777727,0.0002799951,0.00016780413,0.00034155019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996269,0.000046169407,0.000049687904,0.00011413526,0.00004041657,0.00012271042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002281762,0.00009949056,0.00018577557,0.000036114103,0.00037210542,0.00006791456,0.00007658855,0.0001194619,0.0002722648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006158538,0.000113805516,0.00005142727,0.00012554148,0.00014062271,0.00013552755,0.000044140656,0.00019124197,0.0001461594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026867993,0.00029189527,0.6199614,0.00039028283,0.00029153496,0.00009990794,0.3275421,0.000026556392,0.0016571241,0.030043365,0.0040733647,0.015353828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009314462,0.00042371746,0.8629384,0.00020590384,0.0001022168,0.000043771197,0.01736079,0.000028868357,0.00015134345,0.0033780779,0.1137152,0.00072026975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014239042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002735355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31018132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020665195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021491833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46408543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943542755","doi":"10.7202/1057027ar","title":"Le rôle protectionniste du législateur et l’adoption internationale","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01909500925827328,"score_gpt":0.2574708705259144,"score_spread":0.2383758612676411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943542755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7362222,0.0011983308,0.00031623323,0.04752372,0.0022974988,0.0009297064,0.000027507722,0.00012871218,0.21135609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.857145,0.0011484458,0.0006465639,0.00024655808,0.0010394687,0.00008007712,0.000017861947,0.000025673167,0.13965034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980863,0.00030397958,0.0003354515,0.00041266406,0.00035690962,0.0005047236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990817,0.00013783998,0.00024235775,0.00019159306,0.00021342296,0.00013312303],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007048036,0.00016974818,0.00029678206,0.000048245838,0.00054331747,0.0001537557,0.00031713652,0.00025139342,0.0006434616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021646381,0.00024386305,0.00023069493,0.00035155274,0.0002958978,0.0006984776,0.00012262989,0.0003832372,0.002280428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035770012,0.00032480535,0.042546067,0.00036650916,0.00019756508,0.000023854125,0.025071548,0.001221791,0.0015417283,0.9175479,0.0030559513,0.008066524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014327114,0.00023200893,0.06909699,0.00073564606,0.00010532397,0.00007759914,0.01392086,0.0034794111,0.00044857414,0.038265046,0.8712405,0.00096532557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009834384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032849577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87928283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009021512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015649576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943695129","doi":"","title":"ENFORCEABILITY OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RIGHTS IN THE WAKE OF GOSSELIN: ROOM FOR CAUTIOUS OPTIMISM","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Justiciability; Political science; Supreme court; Social rights; Context (archaeology); Optimism; Law; Human rights; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04081102600490723,"score_gpt":0.32143117250879294,"score_spread":0.2806201465038857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943695129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5336148,0.094778165,0.000006656947,0.33657444,0.00034887603,0.007870849,0.000315139,0.000023837385,0.02646719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954876,0.0036157435,0.00006107579,0.0006457322,0.00006962442,0.000043928398,0.000002774712,0.0000025765978,0.00007097387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991708,0.00016738473,0.0002526832,0.000102169026,0.000097729375,0.00020923514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953663,0.00014061292,0.0001065299,0.000109561995,0.00005171543,0.000054930057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013841034,0.00007464776,0.00027043614,0.000011591274,0.0006419601,0.000014578895,0.00026855493,0.00004992204,0.000042108524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012929524,0.000041064755,0.00009145419,0.00007030051,0.00046089687,0.000049189322,0.000012748858,0.00007355209,0.000004127768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062448444,0.000022247426,0.00051688077,0.0010907569,0.00006906602,0.0000013306213,0.09523999,0.000056720906,0.0000032166938,0.89293706,0.0036793018,0.0063771736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006146993,0.000049731705,0.013576415,0.0005534842,0.00015996696,0.0000019247198,0.0041311756,0.000008667021,0.000012963105,0.024728622,0.95590967,0.00025269017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72992015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95258945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95223033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046648033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034803335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4937503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943811979","doi":"10.7202/1058348ar","title":"Le droit au patrimoine familial et le droit à la succession : droits irréconciliables ?","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013423537783119596,"score_gpt":0.2627894625105487,"score_spread":0.24936592472742908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943811979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78696704,0.0039503304,0.00013898672,0.01830625,0.002498993,0.0011891953,0.000207655,0.00027600143,0.18646556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91461354,0.0024412514,0.00068170147,0.000556227,0.0017200186,0.000085517626,0.000088078974,0.0001058051,0.079707876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99378735,0.0009354031,0.0010122784,0.0012732673,0.000978984,0.0020127099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99678284,0.00086902396,0.0006108556,0.0006977291,0.00037722124,0.0006623512],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021957033,0.00060396054,0.0012687654,0.00013279534,0.0013641324,0.0003229695,0.0011633384,0.0009770776,0.0005415864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068609254,0.0008481731,0.0006976438,0.0011129319,0.0012089431,0.0014778075,0.00051372644,0.0010907929,0.001481994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015008044,0.00094703113,0.06809747,0.0011907147,0.0003595053,0.00020007683,0.024832636,0.00073023455,0.0033534404,0.87411785,0.004346779,0.021674205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009089308,0.0008798359,0.15085803,0.0040840963,0.0006671668,0.00018551717,0.045524467,0.0034608413,0.0026999742,0.17262666,0.6049839,0.0049401517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14518505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035442594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7014912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023966965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018168981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943937776","doi":"10.22922/jcpl.26.1.201902.215","title":"A Review on the Legal Systems Related to Birth in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Comparative Private Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.13664712113355118,"score_gpt":0.3943324084322792,"score_spread":0.25768528729872797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943937776","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002880501,0.9778911,5.91149e-7,0.0051909443,0.00078434474,0.00227798,0.000014718258,0.0000057996363,0.013546483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005004218,0.9924618,0.0000045507386,0.0009865727,0.00014446842,0.000027708256,9.041736e-7,0.0000145333515,0.0013552613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99283147,0.00442345,0.0012672546,0.00015385324,0.0009301056,0.0003938769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99550116,0.0022506448,0.0015300623,0.00030445962,0.0002865805,0.00012710593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003338827,0.0003594173,0.002393795,0.000042914508,0.00051868474,0.00008841834,0.0014996346,0.000082930135,0.00006743516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002607548,0.00014417701,0.00030368622,0.000754701,0.00023941154,0.00013421066,0.00014333038,0.0012402576,0.00012923837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010449289,0.00012842205,0.000028972541,0.024403043,0.002576247,0.00008350885,0.032090534,0.00065619964,8.214504e-7,0.722192,0.19117625,0.02655954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075810014,0.00005137149,0.000010386105,0.048903383,0.00022988065,0.000012505241,0.0016379402,0.0000011934684,1.60295e-7,0.000053291395,0.9488418,0.00018226591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5772268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59737796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7576656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021801624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015250267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5879368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945015473","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1371","title":"McLachlin’s Law: In All Its Complex Majesty","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Principle of legality; Majesty; Dialectic; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11783457454489336,"score_gpt":0.3753411928913321,"score_spread":0.25750661834643873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945015473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024534153,0.19512871,0.0000019635754,0.060671337,0.00097641535,0.004574745,0.000040579085,0.00031777367,0.7137543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9037064,0.0760401,0.00028253175,0.015086582,0.00024134754,0.00009554298,0.000029115108,0.000026324458,0.004492065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975448,0.00044710294,0.00044717197,0.0003762603,0.0005987071,0.00058595015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990975,0.00015878327,0.00012733876,0.00027156796,0.00019399803,0.00015080134],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012234175,0.00021878541,0.0006322341,0.000013289229,0.00031991277,0.00006332529,0.00048178824,0.00010984784,0.0026684175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018720287,0.00017288767,0.00018301733,0.00023462946,0.00027506283,0.0003375921,0.00014236881,0.00024381452,0.0027260575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007361498,0.00012217906,0.0041315258,0.0021111576,0.00007699525,0.000013061991,0.0039161667,0.000003072046,0.00017634904,0.9597717,0.027971221,0.0016991902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022711296,0.000017651635,0.0023952723,0.0011222133,0.00003648625,6.9190645e-7,0.00022564552,0.000007396736,0.0000071100117,0.00042378006,0.99528337,0.00025327443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01663441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036251158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96731216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030715571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048935304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945058320","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1330","title":"Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), The Constitutional Attack on Canada’s Ban on Assisted Dying: Missing an Obvious Chance to Rule on the Charter’s Disability Equality Guarantee","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Supreme court; Constitutional right; Economic Justice; Section (typography); Political science; Criminal code; Constitutional law; Sociology; Criminal law; Business","score_opus":0.11774662583268196,"score_gpt":0.3546349874853857,"score_spread":0.23688836165270372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945058320","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24832375,0.0038533055,0.000012507084,0.719349,0.0016987628,0.0029078638,0.00047899273,0.000085624204,0.023290135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9656867,0.00072996476,0.0000148936015,0.03231781,0.00046945765,0.0001237231,0.000011187184,0.000011591834,0.00063466554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99569434,0.0013188707,0.00046329907,0.00055906794,0.001334832,0.00062960247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788433,0.0007641767,0.00017971382,0.0006700807,0.00026106832,0.00024060287],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016321378,0.00032265869,0.00047909346,0.0000051429724,0.0024884855,0.00009088428,0.0006774141,0.000064951164,0.00035379597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081430515,0.00014720153,0.00012866978,0.0001592849,0.0012274832,0.00012549027,0.000064845546,0.00023617833,0.00003998923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009615755,0.0003257604,0.0029677593,0.00045195152,0.00025302384,0.00002367958,0.0038356679,0.000022996166,0.00035386,0.6611653,0.30227038,0.028233489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014981223,0.00004765224,0.011614259,0.001499629,0.00003953964,0.0000010932549,0.00023200801,0.0000044377143,0.000073035975,0.000081747596,0.9859432,0.00031358542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9627125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99693364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71736294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026808486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013969563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945455563","doi":"10.1017/cls.2019.8","title":"Rethinking Racine v Woods from a Decolonizing Perspective: Challenging the Applicability of Attachment Theory to Indigenous Families Involved with Child Protection","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Tribunal; Commission; Supreme court; Perspective (graphical); Royal Commission; Sociology; Law; Human rights; Political science; Ethnology; Art","score_opus":0.01851872083693038,"score_gpt":0.2701148192813038,"score_spread":0.2515960984443734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945455563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98545516,0.0014609585,0.00015980784,0.0076099955,0.00024336738,0.0010004187,0.000029283132,0.000011973035,0.0040290216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979503,0.0002265347,0.0004146854,0.0010000282,0.00026424343,0.000026760667,0.0000018330015,0.000018115034,0.0000974821],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833727,0.00027785948,0.00034912102,0.00027276867,0.00020459769,0.00055840926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981305,0.00033309284,0.00034633896,0.00018192957,0.00045586898,0.0005522654],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021838823,0.00018777432,0.00046868648,0.00004075354,0.0018159797,0.00009305441,0.00031256277,0.00016207383,0.000033146258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023457817,0.00014292206,0.00020690629,0.0002602189,0.0006281606,0.0002296259,0.0000336076,0.000617571,7.917807e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025786389,0.000013948392,0.0035267363,0.00004872902,0.00031976998,0.0000066519183,0.8957897,0.000115764386,0.0000600695,0.09866161,0.000012702698,0.001418543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072293694,0.0003035451,0.02117854,0.00041020574,0.00013511871,0.000012546792,0.952183,0.000025535282,0.00004976324,0.016206851,0.008438844,0.00033307722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45180416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87329674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42149255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024261808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006110271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945678222","doi":"10.29173/alr2516","title":"Envisioning Indigenous Community Courts to Realize Justice in Canada for First Nations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Economic Justice; Commission; Political science; Law; Colonialism; Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; First nation; Indigenous rights; Public administration; Sociology; Human rights; Business","score_opus":0.03719898466501784,"score_gpt":0.33430139929520747,"score_spread":0.2971024146301896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945678222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56472176,0.053980768,0.000014694488,0.07007879,0.001995887,0.014427086,0.00010659209,0.00007155671,0.29460284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790705,0.014003495,0.00017964334,0.0051022475,0.000054695418,0.00010205192,0.000020363923,0.000010839666,0.001456199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986799,0.00028582898,0.00027859118,0.00014740134,0.00026418245,0.0003441004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99604267,0.00340688,0.00009429625,0.0002128764,0.00012647516,0.000116803734],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007054784,0.00011275241,0.00032902538,0.000014102023,0.0019969533,0.00003099223,0.00034782215,0.000039214727,0.00014441932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025167053,0.00009497499,0.00005576104,0.00028687596,0.000045456007,0.000121140845,0.00008292047,0.0001578026,0.000072089206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024153287,0.0002858076,0.020668216,0.014506683,0.00021149796,0.0000067637143,0.34824362,0.00032057357,0.000008865824,0.54249746,0.06047401,0.01275236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117776945,0.000017690947,0.0023948192,0.0017827732,0.000055071378,2.9868525e-7,0.0040232735,0.0000031473212,0.0000012897086,0.00006169797,0.9913817,0.00016045722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9987062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99995404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9309077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095208734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037000628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945859056","doi":"","title":"The Canadian constitutional history and its determinants","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Political science; Constitutional law; Law; Order (exchange); Sociology; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08019135196767825,"score_gpt":0.30847716184537355,"score_spread":0.2282858098776953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945859056","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49947384,0.00081009243,0.00009570235,0.0025028973,0.0010557696,0.0014079426,0.000058177266,0.000055317883,0.49454027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997754,0.00017052295,0.00004134606,0.000019275865,0.00004871786,0.0000013173218,0.000004248425,0.000001290338,0.0019593092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826235,0.00021509791,0.00016346089,0.0001089286,0.00086924573,0.00038091454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983056,0.00016054457,0.000115485374,0.00012496392,0.0010373808,0.00025602232],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019426156,0.00007270994,0.00014539518,0.00018272611,0.0041739717,0.00007251985,0.0003905325,0.000121044264,0.00009897272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046615594,0.000064742104,0.000043037173,0.0002366479,0.0022010868,0.0012009587,0.00013146679,0.00020418911,0.0005064912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010091995,0.000008056126,0.010320986,0.00026635703,0.000069181326,0.000014077341,0.08029703,0.00004527239,0.000054469438,0.88817775,0.014242805,0.006403091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000361304,0.00002435412,0.010630111,0.00005661199,0.0000054479315,0.0000028314892,0.06337114,0.0004648505,0.000004828911,0.000008608427,0.92498446,0.000085464315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2410029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28433883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9107416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030234086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002498957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99712247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946927932","doi":"10.7202/1059524ar","title":"L’influence religieuse sur le droit civil du Québec","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012876096143054861,"score_gpt":0.23427033989621074,"score_spread":0.2213942437531559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946927932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88880694,0.009866045,0.000013628762,0.043618444,0.0011525451,0.00069231604,0.00004032951,0.00020845918,0.05560128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90378577,0.0049381144,0.00022350183,0.00076849246,0.0011215978,0.000050445113,0.000008353298,0.00005572798,0.08904802],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964317,0.00028673635,0.00060960825,0.0007886936,0.00056547043,0.0013178105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977077,0.0005575262,0.00035707734,0.0005891494,0.00036548075,0.0004230245],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007889723,0.00034923275,0.0007287056,0.00005699719,0.0008084612,0.00018879393,0.0009502824,0.0004513237,0.0008731326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009954019,0.00049623754,0.0004276339,0.0006918033,0.0009648567,0.0009633002,0.0002911523,0.00058746606,0.0052791536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115095754,0.0010855914,0.5639443,0.0016582803,0.0006830324,0.00037927445,0.10932328,0.0062476434,0.002416675,0.21908925,0.0808925,0.014165066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018521599,0.00025572703,0.23980968,0.0012384349,0.00025453416,0.0000625334,0.009613237,0.0011909736,0.00043697603,0.01707723,0.72632015,0.0018883406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55120575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2739602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64542764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025565198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011153794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946991612","doi":"10.7202/1059396ar","title":"LES NOUVELLES RÈGLES RELATIVES À LA FILIATION","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.024452968563565478,"score_gpt":0.2820466200658873,"score_spread":0.25759365150232183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946991612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74711895,0.007536561,0.000036338635,0.01096032,0.00092079776,0.0004516749,0.000038578328,0.00009909489,0.23283769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8259007,0.003708382,0.0012011571,0.00006906593,0.00068630214,0.000023895522,0.000014354507,0.000024259327,0.16837192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977828,0.0005102193,0.00034666393,0.0004235049,0.0003248151,0.00061196735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985223,0.0007366996,0.0002478835,0.00020585401,0.00013453708,0.00015273134],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000584327,0.00020632344,0.00039799415,0.00004309392,0.0005977728,0.00011510457,0.00031600666,0.0004378302,0.0014931888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041698312,0.00026885205,0.00025195148,0.0003826282,0.0006154794,0.00048180783,0.00010500526,0.00040366725,0.0017867532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034181918,0.0002507952,0.12660424,0.0006298848,0.00029491182,0.000029384199,0.1774371,0.0005099868,0.0011735926,0.643659,0.005556205,0.04382074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091971544,0.0001774398,0.36102173,0.0012133671,0.0002216888,0.000017331366,0.05854737,0.0012151176,0.00036689852,0.032264225,0.54289246,0.0011426802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067935465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011258799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61139476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084141653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008807585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947002259","doi":"10.7202/1058597ar","title":"La garde conjointe des enfants de familles désunies","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Avant garde; Philosophy; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.021798821107533298,"score_gpt":0.28154728903411746,"score_spread":0.2597484679265842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947002259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7724808,0.009294787,0.00002828267,0.002847586,0.0007596858,0.00038900226,0.00004867776,0.00011480959,0.21403639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8802702,0.009352678,0.0013740665,0.00030268243,0.0006703319,0.000030293035,0.0000067389597,0.000039198843,0.107953824],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969463,0.0006589986,0.0003847777,0.00047057352,0.00033912223,0.001200241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983989,0.0006305467,0.00019998208,0.00028225657,0.00016737623,0.00032092817],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009863937,0.0002765878,0.0005824103,0.0000493722,0.0006467094,0.00017785672,0.0005044065,0.0004368897,0.0011075794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005679617,0.00035799455,0.00034734188,0.0002822188,0.0016942399,0.00036957036,0.00019210149,0.00049327133,0.0018396584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008511612,0.00036404096,0.35492977,0.0018149933,0.00075847004,0.00026264973,0.40981546,0.00028921483,0.0028091948,0.13196917,0.0097343605,0.08716755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016595151,0.00028733266,0.30538964,0.002658111,0.00039397096,0.00017475584,0.117414534,0.00086489075,0.0011335327,0.06693093,0.5012644,0.001828428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0121519985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004675627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014023477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001596127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947072380","doi":"10.7202/1059555ar","title":"Divorce Reform in Canada: New Perspectives; An Analytical Review of Bill C-10 (Canada), 1984","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Law; Commission; Political science; Law reform; Substantive due process; Mediation; Sociology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.02077784982546968,"score_gpt":0.2757446722454064,"score_spread":0.25496682241993673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947072380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80103964,0.011561906,0.0000021231078,0.026332296,0.0002787497,0.0010371156,0.00004324378,0.0000377502,0.1596672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850429,0.0061663017,0.00012474212,0.0004942704,0.00020451676,0.0000088126935,0.0000084542,0.000012817582,0.007937141],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980972,0.00013993349,0.00038378287,0.0003228627,0.0005460527,0.00051017874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897766,0.0001002796,0.0001570026,0.00027138347,0.00020359101,0.00029010032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004786532,0.0001241149,0.00051509566,0.000030183166,0.00012274014,0.000014937588,0.00040633205,0.00007094028,0.00084437546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057479367,0.00012273496,0.00008063448,0.0005771461,0.000104682804,0.00018502395,0.000067693734,0.00021320234,0.000017606206],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019544922,0.00053329807,0.49177352,0.008402839,0.00060474424,0.00037871653,0.066168115,0.00030993397,0.00019881153,0.28698215,0.12003415,0.024418272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016876038,0.00026341324,0.6128193,0.008529346,0.00024463472,0.000017054925,0.15877269,0.0010164512,0.00007792427,0.003486232,0.21117444,0.0019109099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28349593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010194775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041738236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947158220","doi":"10.7202/1059523ar","title":"Critères de qualification des acquêts et des Family Assets en droit québécois et ontarien","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.03586718824020959,"score_gpt":0.3167255226416232,"score_spread":0.2808583344014136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947158220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9443875,0.007092452,0.00037156296,0.010532846,0.00068297697,0.000774201,0.00009124382,0.00018124821,0.035885986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9627758,0.00670462,0.0055365996,0.0011685815,0.00050176686,0.00010110565,0.000049516362,0.000059371916,0.023102611],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955676,0.0013185769,0.00059235544,0.0007027862,0.00056075165,0.0012579251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749446,0.0009981161,0.00032866086,0.00042225776,0.00037045957,0.00038603102],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002429505,0.00035690964,0.00063392334,0.000077499695,0.00082486315,0.000330123,0.0007160669,0.00052164466,0.00034346132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012957004,0.00047586544,0.0003453006,0.0005718903,0.0010286303,0.0011870639,0.00018814039,0.0005873335,0.0010247179],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055452565,0.00039325384,0.31174397,0.0008041906,0.0003072408,0.000041719468,0.43249398,0.0003819259,0.004801411,0.225415,0.0026517976,0.020910049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061076006,0.0002049671,0.8006634,0.00083887164,0.00021265932,0.00003541415,0.047655985,0.0003078771,0.00033118532,0.076527655,0.071675144,0.0009360776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3604606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2919813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48891944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039892346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053712446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947240080","doi":"10.7202/1058494ar","title":"A Practitioner’s Guide to Spousal Support in Divorce Proceedings","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Law; Child support; Family law; Perspective (graphical); Supreme court; Action (physics); Closure (psychology); Sociology; Term (time); Political science; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.016528434753196607,"score_gpt":0.29903343568000823,"score_spread":0.28250500092681163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947240080","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7451244,0.000020667832,0.000009861781,0.008063219,0.00018929584,0.0006470359,0.0000052070486,0.0000935055,0.24584684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96046877,0.00007362438,0.0012326363,0.000686167,0.00040574494,0.00008375628,0.000004518743,0.000015869158,0.037028942],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985001,0.00003554654,0.0002609019,0.0003262174,0.0003158459,0.00056140864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993907,0.000082210834,0.00009836692,0.000102100494,0.00014192003,0.00018470202],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006782786,0.000103096456,0.00024496237,0.000068620124,0.00021766941,0.00009803128,0.00028002323,0.00011985949,0.0004885846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006698865,0.00013422374,0.00007653787,0.00043595332,0.00007512141,0.00041424768,0.000092762144,0.00019249458,0.0012759711],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104129234,0.0002918977,0.62102985,0.00027234608,0.00007128839,0.00010142259,0.16477618,0.00016571122,0.006698187,0.12738796,0.075876735,0.0032242995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082264346,0.00018490637,0.23341098,0.00024205536,0.0000313011,0.000020575711,0.030571572,0.000078191464,0.00035868815,0.004214846,0.7293213,0.0007429433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005464273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034810177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6534445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008862857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009342389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947241187","doi":"10.7202/1059395ar","title":"LA VALIDITÉ PLUS QUE DOUTEUSE DE LA « LOI PORTANT RÉFORME DU DROIT DE LA FAMILLE »","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01309443424254887,"score_gpt":0.2648505447641996,"score_spread":0.25175611052165076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947241187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8177327,0.0029698943,0.000110407425,0.0033111142,0.00083167,0.00063773367,0.000084591135,0.00018416923,0.17413771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.941682,0.007977051,0.001288982,0.0005654937,0.0014884816,0.00007860844,0.000019053969,0.00008173306,0.046818636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99505085,0.0014643777,0.0006397821,0.0006928755,0.00057219306,0.001579903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99648243,0.0019375249,0.00039161002,0.00046927182,0.00015443974,0.0005647482],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031942793,0.00042882186,0.00083807897,0.00007579633,0.0007012423,0.0003667008,0.0008608633,0.0010605118,0.0007233673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010143153,0.0005457637,0.00054286927,0.0005684479,0.0013905577,0.0005313584,0.00029065218,0.001039274,0.0010830271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014990605,0.0008210235,0.30208778,0.0013508571,0.00082771777,0.0018815146,0.175994,0.001995977,0.002452851,0.48269948,0.01914831,0.01059059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032619957,0.00024857343,0.18138559,0.0013060125,0.00060978916,0.0007529814,0.03932293,0.0027993126,0.0005433367,0.06595718,0.7015698,0.0022425023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023866786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002413515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6824215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004069033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071750075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947263021","doi":"10.7202/1059525ar","title":"Quelques aspects de l’influence religieuse sur le droit de la personne et de la famille au Québec","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011314602336054138,"score_gpt":0.27063690072980495,"score_spread":0.2593222983937508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947263021","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87468,0.0060841753,0.000049030114,0.01013552,0.00028521303,0.0004684945,0.000038854792,0.00022482059,0.10803388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969779,0.006732355,0.0017430092,0.0011882702,0.00068490795,0.000068922214,0.000006896537,0.000073465366,0.019723155],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951393,0.001652642,0.00045098556,0.0006852894,0.0004436165,0.0016281412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967541,0.0017811786,0.00029950446,0.00044464195,0.00019784571,0.00052269496],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027079952,0.0003786498,0.00067326624,0.000068668254,0.0008747865,0.00031191602,0.0008260509,0.0007018136,0.00015060444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002324455,0.00051386905,0.00040433416,0.00050039624,0.0013942894,0.00069075526,0.0002347317,0.00092492974,0.00047755626],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070979615,0.00057826965,0.4133372,0.0008133144,0.0003498863,0.00050800527,0.2812645,0.0023539716,0.006898788,0.28674263,0.0043779733,0.0027044583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019938927,0.00028335935,0.77355146,0.0016447338,0.0003169564,0.0002867022,0.041049704,0.0014115704,0.001702057,0.044783145,0.13111949,0.0018569038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83652943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23941873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5971107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01012636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039770245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947336318","doi":"10.7202/1059449ar","title":"LE PIQUETAGE","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.01799399683322791,"score_gpt":0.26234259948340066,"score_spread":0.24434860265017275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947336318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.526643,0.006109751,0.000033465498,0.033474904,0.0019100864,0.0005236606,0.000024276384,0.00011075083,0.4311701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7477135,0.0014802739,0.00056088046,0.00045639765,0.0010220996,0.00002121271,0.0000061510536,0.000024760266,0.24871473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781793,0.00025886492,0.0003117824,0.00043427467,0.0002984681,0.00087868643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989969,0.00019087242,0.00016603153,0.00029180787,0.00010996893,0.00024440596],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005414868,0.00018191889,0.00043523734,0.000030356387,0.0005082425,0.000106534535,0.00044152554,0.00032758972,0.0014741077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016800014,0.0002685894,0.00029895824,0.00040903973,0.0004973196,0.00044128054,0.00013652917,0.000390425,0.0059802267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013625278,0.00019138433,0.022720968,0.00042399697,0.00016033849,0.000058125002,0.029122597,0.000114666254,0.00081448886,0.92624253,0.008504191,0.011633107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071740104,0.00011585369,0.028951628,0.0004186123,0.000102623715,0.000021379987,0.011622854,0.00036445766,0.00030523184,0.0329363,0.9236466,0.0007970345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011678982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023941945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9151424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007247652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019509337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947336602","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v12n2p79","title":"A Brief Analysis of the Essence of Education and Human Ethics-Hegel’s View","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Individualism; Epistemology; Sociology; Determinacy; Politics; Information ethics; Meta-ethics; Social science; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03512962697681104,"score_gpt":0.3752515058570027,"score_spread":0.34012187888019163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947336602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880641,0.0007592587,0.0000030018844,0.0032390424,0.000112256115,0.000051951807,0.0000038851886,7.737048e-7,0.007765698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990189,0.0002754522,0.0000473885,0.00025067595,0.00005687412,2.1505926e-7,1.4004242e-7,0.0000013949367,0.000348922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992706,0.00011657992,0.00022701948,0.000044019365,0.00025779233,0.0000839997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990717,0.00016332789,0.0003179939,0.000054165717,0.00034328012,0.000049507944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054360693,0.00003980718,0.00020767178,0.000021157735,0.00026088982,0.000022126867,0.00009455571,0.000047971575,0.000022566748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015396005,0.00002390284,0.00008407389,0.00015637856,0.0004435332,0.00007830328,0.000031410007,0.00013214402,1.00144845e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.345741e-7,0.000033293403,0.031497,0.000043780845,0.00014479076,7.196762e-8,0.0165381,0.0000024938945,0.0004233719,0.95115936,0.000032642867,0.00012427058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034492428,0.00014638524,0.84684414,0.0003778194,0.0013310876,0.0000032610624,0.039044157,0.000017741084,0.00053245696,0.034682106,0.07651509,0.0001608111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015105727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032096533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91647726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031003277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008442542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99145275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947337420","doi":"","title":"MOVING TOWARD SAME-SEX MARRIAGE","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Charter; Political science; Modernization theory; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07014460930952837,"score_gpt":0.3263478769814064,"score_spread":0.256203267671878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947337420","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004391948,0.21449506,0.0000029541025,0.4213625,0.00044355638,0.001352936,0.000014940664,0.000098700875,0.3578374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5688399,0.35420138,0.0001384195,0.035547838,0.0009932608,0.00010098708,0.000007105315,0.000028050374,0.040143065],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985714,0.00030996662,0.00017735091,0.0001599124,0.00027746498,0.00050391123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920684,0.000089530455,0.000058919646,0.00020294696,0.00007209348,0.00036969074],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001067023,0.00011776602,0.00024420206,0.000017084958,0.0015310999,0.0000882132,0.00046771174,0.000054926044,0.0025633797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007346587,0.00007550416,0.000110896115,0.00028871256,0.0002636849,0.00010223133,0.00003739621,0.00016343094,0.0008340395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002921229,0.000017480614,0.007996794,0.00077442796,0.00017409929,0.00014604245,0.056713272,0.0000029710009,0.0000075257813,0.12220545,0.44244486,0.36951414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003382302,0.0000034751163,0.002526123,0.00033650803,0.00003317887,0.0000021129927,0.0012713394,0.0000011556419,4.3355232e-7,0.00028379133,0.9953863,0.00012175176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75961185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9003747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56444794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007158311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030699227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947394613","doi":"10.7202/1059390ar","title":"LES EFFETS DU MARIAGE, SELON LA CONCEPTION DU LÉGISLATEUR QUÉBÉCOIS DE 1980","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013269706276767827,"score_gpt":0.25697626518865585,"score_spread":0.24370655891188803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947394613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8949425,0.0032016186,0.00006511007,0.013851435,0.0014547509,0.00067035394,0.000039199862,0.0001607813,0.08561422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9557844,0.005081823,0.00053688977,0.00038262125,0.0021145479,0.00005066288,0.00002242531,0.000045563873,0.03598111],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675655,0.0008903164,0.00043979037,0.0005553862,0.00038614072,0.00097182626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830294,0.0006786469,0.00029595554,0.00027078064,0.00017394056,0.00027774705],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011622339,0.00030471786,0.00056854985,0.000046979647,0.0008022223,0.00018206457,0.00047090417,0.0005980713,0.0009864955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046746957,0.00039665677,0.00034013143,0.00041602706,0.0006767393,0.00046018878,0.00016418479,0.00052522117,0.0017585612],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007981017,0.00038226316,0.6017028,0.0008192636,0.00035882427,0.00021137035,0.14864543,0.00047866214,0.0021848008,0.1677294,0.008043167,0.06936418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016571505,0.00021762164,0.45049587,0.0006952445,0.0003187017,0.000100180994,0.014193081,0.0019561984,0.00024029934,0.0066937963,0.5222978,0.00113405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1352213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026791627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5142546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018343972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015650764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947416598","doi":"10.7202/1059284ar","title":"Regards sur les systèmes de partage des biens en droit matrimonial québécois et ontarien","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020327147053809985,"score_gpt":0.26382747057567313,"score_spread":0.24350032352186315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947416598","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9451284,0.0077710142,0.00007661883,0.009869467,0.0012287931,0.0008842556,0.00013710813,0.00022296503,0.034681372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9139018,0.004524778,0.0014975566,0.00033777556,0.001210178,0.000073814364,0.000023340774,0.000068188354,0.07836256],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99545795,0.00086907065,0.0006403434,0.00075701775,0.0006062373,0.0016693667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764884,0.0007940307,0.00035330837,0.0004523771,0.00028057193,0.0004708662],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017561279,0.00042215458,0.000891444,0.00008413272,0.00091776677,0.00029844136,0.00077971636,0.0006746758,0.0011063454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094297697,0.0005500542,0.0005415079,0.00057461055,0.0009788313,0.0007413026,0.00026464585,0.0007516663,0.000984152],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011068986,0.00042044016,0.42985153,0.0019179,0.00061709696,0.00027201258,0.3474713,0.00050109584,0.0011541259,0.1918814,0.004367703,0.021434702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018450653,0.0005000348,0.5100282,0.0024665487,0.000702878,0.00014629743,0.05050033,0.0008670338,0.0005202865,0.0459061,0.3842959,0.0022213454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51116264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42743236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3799282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004791633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064486475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947420023","doi":"10.7202/1058495ar","title":"L’impact de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés sur le droit de la famille au Québec","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015209583879104075,"score_gpt":0.2698737326584115,"score_spread":0.25466414877930743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947420023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90770435,0.00328474,0.000043662672,0.0062579587,0.0004403993,0.00052634516,0.00011602455,0.00014422975,0.08148227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9412966,0.0022165424,0.00042898618,0.00037828746,0.0006687172,0.000059534428,0.000017225366,0.00008502041,0.054849118],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948748,0.0013936475,0.0004787122,0.00065266463,0.00033450857,0.002265664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99662364,0.0015571633,0.0002759476,0.00040919305,0.00018259167,0.00095146697],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002560215,0.00042786024,0.0007776811,0.000088614004,0.0010585745,0.00027431658,0.00071746524,0.0006751209,0.00050597946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011225445,0.00055707595,0.00052569935,0.00064309716,0.0016233923,0.0006856676,0.00018369219,0.0008289408,0.00046776523],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075038406,0.0006426003,0.582179,0.00062047737,0.0006896184,0.00033358097,0.2793035,0.001435617,0.002683071,0.10404047,0.003651587,0.024345407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015386988,0.00026048577,0.8448304,0.00073346024,0.00022037062,0.00022576403,0.010090228,0.0014431691,0.00021929592,0.02747137,0.11172842,0.0012383111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95515907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8303591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26921326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0143482955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030369365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947508577","doi":"10.7202/1059529ar","title":"The Co-Parental Divorce: Removing the Children from the Jurisdiction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Mediation; Child custody; Confidentiality; Law; Psychology; Best interests; Political science","score_opus":0.011602042843237789,"score_gpt":0.2631386294088412,"score_spread":0.2515365865656034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947508577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9570294,0.0010238776,0.0000066787607,0.013740313,0.00056105497,0.0006600485,0.000026923086,0.00008589331,0.026865806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99357283,0.00083118037,0.000027659116,0.0003443855,0.0013635599,0.000030355579,0.000015787518,0.0000125223405,0.0038017128],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845797,0.00031995305,0.00019228128,0.0002305962,0.00037440864,0.0004247937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858993,0.0008314648,0.000138396,0.0003305345,0.00004956013,0.000060110262],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079947576,0.000103959006,0.00014333187,0.0000065399818,0.0031560813,0.0002738071,0.0007267751,0.00009211516,0.0001294809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027649937,0.000064092965,0.00015224006,0.00017042765,0.00043197212,0.00015359232,0.0001139181,0.00032698238,0.00041495846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029346562,0.000035147776,0.86782426,0.000006479954,0.00021883368,0.0000024414192,0.083534546,0.000045874607,0.00033992156,0.02113567,0.014136292,0.012691212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021024639,0.00001706299,0.91891867,0.000045230303,0.000051266026,0.0000034961442,0.018652294,0.00010999051,0.00005991976,0.004700185,0.05705554,0.00017608414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015847247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053192414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06488225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000354403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004054263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99814165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947536659","doi":"10.7202/1059192ar","title":"Le droit d’un tiers à la garde d’un enfant : l’affaire Vignaux-Fines c. Chardon, [1987] 2 R.C.S. 244","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.012826495451307722,"score_gpt":0.23876324174205707,"score_spread":0.22593674629074934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947536659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6676984,0.012082356,0.00006886858,0.029908234,0.0030401612,0.0013907545,0.00016301812,0.0003654063,0.28528282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91723186,0.005915347,0.0011905221,0.00053710974,0.0018316638,0.00011301299,0.000049538783,0.00011056913,0.07302039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945949,0.00067271804,0.0008399258,0.0011356581,0.00083349907,0.0019233321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974279,0.0004736007,0.00049694383,0.0006744941,0.00029739473,0.0006296627],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012890367,0.0005927716,0.001187509,0.00010786763,0.0013816995,0.00028115144,0.0011043831,0.0008480108,0.0022650575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003688297,0.00080332643,0.000781935,0.00070916687,0.0012530144,0.00069012836,0.00034955057,0.0009076201,0.0027296834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002220674,0.0015854735,0.069523826,0.0023700923,0.0023103694,0.00085265416,0.18568227,0.00061885925,0.0037539443,0.574081,0.02574826,0.13325115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033213852,0.0003774736,0.04718846,0.001520004,0.00068852596,0.00021581436,0.04575005,0.0015334144,0.0017710775,0.049979895,0.844414,0.0032398757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008725893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020587367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81866574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011126386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038181266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947570889","doi":"10.7202/1059226ar","title":"La présomption de paternité : complice ou rivale de l’acte de naissance","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.0474494437514961,"score_gpt":0.28785711290839594,"score_spread":0.24040766915689984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947570889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9413023,0.0030104658,0.0003119148,0.00791202,0.0006488288,0.00056174427,0.000049790364,0.00015624093,0.046046715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592631,0.0022454604,0.0021278742,0.0005080837,0.0010962662,0.00006487414,0.000012698865,0.00004367232,0.034637976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663025,0.0007823171,0.00037666128,0.00050043105,0.00033566586,0.0013746577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984276,0.00045728814,0.00027667466,0.00030829987,0.0001375055,0.000392632],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012617799,0.00026698722,0.0004738009,0.00003867431,0.00064108876,0.00017771145,0.00057206897,0.00048270923,0.0005106491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028877155,0.00036785007,0.0002715837,0.00035778937,0.0005810852,0.0004270953,0.00014841057,0.0006317691,0.0015516252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009294942,0.0004775623,0.7683773,0.0015721476,0.00030801067,0.0001886056,0.11443147,0.001279075,0.011053893,0.07192984,0.00527491,0.025014263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011764189,0.0001601379,0.73736644,0.0013205581,0.00025066128,0.00018861062,0.010206348,0.004292997,0.0011589945,0.022257632,0.22047469,0.0011465076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014170486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024805395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21519978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026387847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018127402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947604827","doi":"10.7202/1059393ar","title":"LA LOI 89 ET L’AUTORITÉ PARENTALE","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020846407870796637,"score_gpt":0.28546170819481137,"score_spread":0.26461530032401476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947604827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71531194,0.0066224723,0.000011719616,0.013554111,0.0023938448,0.00049689226,0.0000615247,0.00012519672,0.2614223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8612976,0.0028826972,0.00045781574,0.00045308037,0.00097399694,0.000032274296,0.00001720766,0.000033378292,0.13385192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997333,0.0005339574,0.00035104714,0.0004957537,0.0004067693,0.00087948935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872375,0.00041754218,0.00019024273,0.00029522536,0.00010245508,0.00027078963],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008516252,0.00023368753,0.00048197003,0.000033257194,0.00037984678,0.00016391573,0.0004572308,0.00042583924,0.0016834049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020755302,0.0003177197,0.00031172423,0.00042423766,0.00056431734,0.00047456444,0.00018472013,0.0005549871,0.004482859],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004345561,0.00069129263,0.21815722,0.0011576012,0.0004384014,0.00023039979,0.11856831,0.00026474928,0.0010821887,0.5857082,0.024033625,0.04962458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007264754,0.000115089075,0.068683095,0.00058751943,0.00012515306,0.000042653737,0.014748655,0.00026899955,0.00012744214,0.012891456,0.9009204,0.0007630808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064999117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001902138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8768868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011104199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013217142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947628684","doi":"10.7202/1059409ar","title":"LES TRIBUNAUX CANADIENS ET LA PROTECTION DES DROITS DE LA PERSONNE","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023447151050006318,"score_gpt":0.2875757972630302,"score_spread":0.26412864621302384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947628684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84919053,0.0019922727,0.000076435215,0.0049344865,0.00041679107,0.00069133064,0.000046442357,0.00010534411,0.14254634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9398016,0.0012309981,0.0007187075,0.00011724638,0.0005453443,0.00008884721,0.000007070372,0.000035947498,0.057454284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99682057,0.0012305327,0.0002708312,0.000431352,0.00027354155,0.0009731983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986968,0.0004581472,0.00017614354,0.00018580182,0.00016688385,0.00031624248],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016935075,0.00022776943,0.00040090192,0.000054938002,0.00085586566,0.00020269786,0.00030173338,0.00050961366,0.00044562985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074646395,0.00030297783,0.00024671698,0.0004945585,0.0009505698,0.00039700684,0.00007702191,0.0006449064,0.00029938575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007936211,0.0004030526,0.08631408,0.0014329152,0.0004323284,0.0002281321,0.31562886,0.0009357717,0.0034514572,0.49900264,0.0015813868,0.09051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021028395,0.0005243242,0.4054536,0.0020088898,0.00043344646,0.00047804537,0.06368352,0.002922716,0.00058456324,0.060525887,0.4593872,0.0018949608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18023695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05376676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45780584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027885279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022945684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947725684","doi":"10.7202/1059327ar","title":"Le sort d’une instance d’arbitrage d’un grief après la réussite d’un recours en évocation","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.014090011116568536,"score_gpt":0.24252734527374495,"score_spread":0.2284373341571764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947725684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70796597,0.0036019813,0.000102895174,0.034603085,0.0015287728,0.0008219935,0.000056160832,0.00017046521,0.2511487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94870234,0.004666299,0.0016911175,0.00056315353,0.0012885282,0.00008211349,0.000043066622,0.0000640027,0.04289938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996179,0.00070276984,0.0006284273,0.0008001903,0.0005695067,0.001120118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803764,0.00049522374,0.0004349666,0.0004939525,0.00021149877,0.00032671727],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013488248,0.00036901305,0.0006952461,0.00006846391,0.0010015239,0.00020132259,0.00070479023,0.00065466436,0.0006940257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030818424,0.00050717336,0.00037208557,0.0010014328,0.0006650019,0.0009497843,0.00016304397,0.00091672863,0.0014693021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105107254,0.0010014394,0.055612754,0.0010916215,0.0007113309,0.00024795672,0.18317024,0.00042985176,0.0031900674,0.6353616,0.0048082313,0.11426976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00308553,0.00031495813,0.2758373,0.001642106,0.00051302876,0.00014334454,0.048276853,0.0015165793,0.0017786374,0.09343743,0.5706252,0.0028290248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011232312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039516627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56581694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010423112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033956257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947750987","doi":"10.7202/1059391ar","title":"LES RÉGIMES MATRIMONIAUX SECONDAIRES À LA LUMIÈRE DU NOUVEAU CODE CIVIL DU QUÉBEC","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.013577892477466538,"score_gpt":0.2498721581920723,"score_spread":0.23629426571460577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947750987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77658767,0.010057258,0.000013300573,0.048602797,0.0014036231,0.0005847321,0.00011320353,0.0001969783,0.16244043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92925274,0.0037377207,0.0003483277,0.000343538,0.0019044342,0.000053399588,0.0000146281955,0.000065575885,0.06427963],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965671,0.0005432461,0.0005852196,0.0007096465,0.00047635677,0.0011184742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977618,0.0008891769,0.00036981408,0.00039623005,0.00023489595,0.0003480775],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007950773,0.00040407584,0.0008117023,0.00006187282,0.001043374,0.00026109867,0.0007738634,0.00057609665,0.004796622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047230825,0.0005093971,0.0005218456,0.00045100914,0.0012063992,0.00056425243,0.00028732984,0.0006202448,0.003242187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061271574,0.0004339984,0.67815083,0.0012665335,0.00060065486,0.00021113863,0.14076151,0.00021914775,0.0006372156,0.10204148,0.048888065,0.026728153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010251435,0.0001497343,0.14988454,0.00065302337,0.00028422833,0.00008697045,0.034774322,0.00095444237,0.0002780199,0.0027876385,0.80794126,0.0011806943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29664573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3149776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7590532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020064213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005879764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947784110","doi":"","title":"ACPNS Legal Case Notes Series: 2019-30 CANADA TRUST v PUBLIC GUARDIAN AND TRUSTEE 2019 ONSC 1768 (CANLII)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Guardian; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.009919627625948562,"score_gpt":0.21820275218338606,"score_spread":0.2082831245574375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947784110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9566217,0.00019363339,0.0000067380133,0.0286742,0.00023507612,0.00042046187,0.00011921697,0.00015413441,0.013574849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888049,0.00042907678,0.0005840631,0.00004925452,0.00003468472,6.898603e-7,0.000006466135,0.000009762562,0.010081132],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984398,0.000086629545,0.00017878358,0.000450611,0.00030826865,0.00053592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989465,0.0001103669,0.00017927676,0.00035457712,0.00023389944,0.00017537862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024893103,0.00021554015,0.0004315144,0.00017040553,0.0009543694,0.00004419328,0.00050304754,0.00036824204,0.00076596404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027722056,0.00021638826,0.00008382921,0.00040980589,0.0010564371,0.00041073762,0.00041022417,0.00036622497,0.00008569748],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114745206,0.00013741197,0.8823925,0.00010309749,0.0006050198,0.0015760837,0.009845817,0.000009998855,0.00032058186,0.053824324,0.030614065,0.020456308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012558246,0.00010630958,0.100226134,0.000048440055,0.00008641524,0.00009745704,0.0745676,0.00001474125,0.0001870033,0.00035528705,0.8224883,0.00056647806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85775965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8841047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79187423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043616106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050463085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88240576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947836574","doi":"10.7202/1059146ar","title":"Incidences de la réforme du droit de la famille sur le rôle des juges au Québec","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.015220883419002317,"score_gpt":0.258122009705598,"score_spread":0.2429011262865957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947836574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90282834,0.0063303574,0.000058315643,0.0062519424,0.00047069436,0.00041063517,0.000027431819,0.0001437572,0.08347851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9497469,0.0043758275,0.0012434956,0.0001988062,0.0010425024,0.0000627039,0.0000057290404,0.000047741818,0.043276265],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961815,0.0009810737,0.00046330068,0.0005428005,0.00043405307,0.0013972829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968985,0.0019497111,0.00027727772,0.0002929322,0.0001768323,0.0004047942],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023621465,0.0003254268,0.000628165,0.0000634132,0.0013523655,0.00027249203,0.0007810125,0.0005866448,0.00038334526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001344269,0.0004114881,0.00037612644,0.0005139318,0.002526366,0.0008159183,0.00025135183,0.00056973065,0.0006852113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029551136,0.00028064346,0.8332462,0.00048267588,0.00019605902,0.00010019841,0.10067173,0.0004525296,0.0011447641,0.048904903,0.0029313443,0.011559458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013407718,0.00023318589,0.71030235,0.0010563926,0.0002515864,0.00021347677,0.06560266,0.0015990112,0.0010166592,0.05742486,0.15958053,0.0013784899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64430827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2440347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40027356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051411516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020410884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947837352","doi":"10.7202/1059148ar","title":"Le contentieux familial en droit pénal canadien","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015112279091324687,"score_gpt":0.2444189020358247,"score_spread":0.22930662294450002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947837352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8048645,0.0030720003,0.000022126138,0.013810393,0.004007857,0.00075938704,0.00011274348,0.00009692715,0.17325404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79962957,0.0008566833,0.00026243346,0.00037045847,0.0018427632,0.000034606335,0.000018971408,0.000036789417,0.19694771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966247,0.00034865388,0.00049670227,0.0006417645,0.0004879927,0.0014001674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984202,0.0002856097,0.00023432476,0.00035080686,0.00022102856,0.00048807682],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070745626,0.0002840708,0.0006775664,0.000056707613,0.00071831676,0.00013485098,0.00070886157,0.00047255142,0.0008198366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032371678,0.00042181672,0.00040868865,0.00046772434,0.0006445213,0.0005038898,0.00019027377,0.0005748419,0.0022747796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008087941,0.00034466595,0.0985926,0.0006083668,0.0006388552,0.00029557315,0.07786574,0.00022543463,0.0014146002,0.7849018,0.01584303,0.019188428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031143753,0.0004797507,0.15301464,0.000899258,0.00041100144,0.000116607,0.060497336,0.00136186,0.00030879572,0.035605997,0.74195576,0.0022346536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24337651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11692978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74929583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024334518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004720169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947839655","doi":"10.7202/1059143ar","title":"L’évolution du droit des successions dans ses rapports avec la famille","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01685874080840239,"score_gpt":0.2588533028366148,"score_spread":0.2419945620282124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947839655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8192114,0.0026428828,0.00019162337,0.0029118168,0.0018428167,0.000615093,0.00005565346,0.00017104107,0.17235765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86910677,0.005006947,0.000703912,0.00013540835,0.0011362574,0.000056549037,0.00002665012,0.000042999953,0.12378448],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99664897,0.00056568306,0.00052312086,0.0006418936,0.00048762502,0.0011327052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982413,0.0004663347,0.00031236713,0.00036088246,0.00022192672,0.00039715556],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009794987,0.00031577118,0.0005913766,0.00006925978,0.0013403908,0.00016911792,0.0005240084,0.00050213106,0.001159425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046853934,0.00040800904,0.000400652,0.00073887035,0.0016824949,0.0007721438,0.00021095568,0.00047435483,0.0012659242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042859545,0.00066469854,0.6442796,0.0009005035,0.00037137806,0.00027767554,0.16128819,0.0005863874,0.0019664397,0.14755099,0.011061019,0.031010287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012196451,0.00023496937,0.6840597,0.00180428,0.00043466003,0.00019130642,0.04629832,0.0023371195,0.00035666928,0.058323745,0.20305517,0.0016844432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015275447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062140487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19199415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018962489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020875318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948017456","doi":"10.7202/1059285ar","title":"La Cour d’appel et la prestation compensatoire","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018368152631395917,"score_gpt":0.2915176205192371,"score_spread":0.27314946788784117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948017456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7394872,0.0020215122,0.00003851582,0.012086388,0.0007464201,0.0005278576,0.00005314792,0.0000961416,0.24494283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92625785,0.0018314394,0.00073264225,0.00034191593,0.00038153803,0.00002806111,0.000024676234,0.0000298998,0.07037197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973485,0.0010039975,0.00030709495,0.000388193,0.00036748027,0.00058472506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984397,0.00080595305,0.00021515654,0.00021686993,0.00013921171,0.00018308539],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010496163,0.00019306602,0.0003895522,0.000031228454,0.00035251174,0.00017173983,0.0003248859,0.00038384247,0.00058217865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023949031,0.00026046994,0.0001956739,0.0003024185,0.00053786795,0.0004559027,0.00010716315,0.00049415696,0.0017570109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003985793,0.00035139266,0.10319913,0.0009561914,0.000244899,0.00012886133,0.10656647,0.00084407604,0.000506629,0.7392094,0.008454688,0.03949842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010116473,0.000102550584,0.2128281,0.00086315145,0.0001474055,0.000052059655,0.020515798,0.001729144,0.000054971635,0.018309923,0.7436257,0.0007595677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043472373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015182648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.735171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005797628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012688249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948205569","doi":"10.1515/9781773855714-038","title":"5.1 The Independence of the Judiciary","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Judicial independence; Statute; Law; Position (finance); Political science; Autonomy; Judicial discretion; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Supreme court; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.028515898475237507,"score_gpt":0.2377052668468951,"score_spread":0.2091893683716576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948205569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009462364,0.0020120235,0.0000048387137,0.00027699536,0.00038377012,0.00038651048,0.000022892302,0.00003452412,0.9967838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012338055,0.0011619251,0.000025900674,0.000021057282,0.00007449455,2.8383636e-7,8.290758e-7,0.0000108266295,0.9863666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986379,0.00007391543,0.00015666541,0.00020313643,0.0007448451,0.00018353778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989696,0.00024205595,0.00025223638,0.00026914635,0.00021480302,0.000052144103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029068466,0.00015416,0.00024954713,0.00002100639,0.0009961197,0.000020759673,0.00096270104,0.0002953059,0.000046553014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039973664,0.000100974416,0.00028799695,0.000011422295,0.0025503295,0.000043077514,0.00065482786,0.00047914285,0.000009281765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018903993,0.000002913124,0.000008539384,0.00003238122,0.00017620226,0.000008906304,0.009987987,7.9438536e-7,0.0000093161725,0.9850242,0.0017571237,0.0029726992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082731916,0.00001290924,0.00014081168,0.00024886467,0.00018910175,3.555313e-7,0.0013708131,0.000005575595,0.000037512087,0.019900339,0.97787875,0.00013222636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030770764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015272254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97612166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012274558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015130165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9756834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948418414","doi":"","title":"DU MARIAGE GAI A LA POLYGAMIE : TRIOMPHE DU DROIT A L'EGALITE?","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Lesbian; Same sex; Political science; Sociology; Law; Gender studies","score_opus":0.052718911929517276,"score_gpt":0.2779552513832206,"score_spread":0.2252363394537033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948418414","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013638552,0.44763398,0.000002020774,0.25533357,0.0010152915,0.001254232,0.00007990446,0.00004549309,0.29327166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28148586,0.60838044,0.00020640291,0.026232636,0.0016122522,0.00020294229,0.000012897582,0.00006812198,0.081798434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99592584,0.0016334064,0.00053157,0.00040047677,0.00045345558,0.0010552753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978826,0.00029608473,0.0002353659,0.00047000512,0.00020051547,0.00091543124],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002723749,0.0003771241,0.0007079877,0.000040368428,0.001990189,0.00014342753,0.0010332958,0.00023419953,0.012080847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011661722,0.0002684428,0.00042574486,0.00081985956,0.0016039431,0.00027029266,0.00012043877,0.0004423126,0.003288564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000572576,0.000058718928,0.0011606398,0.0011492495,0.00030328587,0.00021979997,0.040585846,1.3777772e-7,9.578727e-7,0.5991537,0.25205293,0.105309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017163523,0.00002695864,0.0068020164,0.0017957181,0.00041855677,0.000029412775,0.0009682514,0.0000047974786,8.5615653e-7,0.0017095101,0.98769605,0.0003762261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90714365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88770235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73564315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016312656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097615056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948541102","doi":"","title":"LA COUR SUPREME FACE A LA VIE, FACE A LA MORT: DE VALEURS ET DE DROITS","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Autonomy; Dignity; Context (archaeology); Law; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Promotion (chess); Foundation (evidence); Sociology; History; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.03626316724901889,"score_gpt":0.3469324294718574,"score_spread":0.31066926222283847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948541102","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026904143,0.4643068,0.0000039666065,0.21496725,0.00015711285,0.0011692699,0.00021466336,0.000057384317,0.2922194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31549022,0.59084886,0.00013505678,0.01427844,0.00021416096,0.00009677782,0.000009249572,0.00004310275,0.07888413],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99381006,0.003984054,0.0003522176,0.00034799552,0.00042199684,0.0010836838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793553,0.00063606125,0.00012098059,0.0003432834,0.00008495714,0.00087917846],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039432105,0.0003435932,0.00057254056,0.000021583248,0.0010776717,0.00020906018,0.0008443004,0.00027971933,0.0025549973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007100799,0.0002633212,0.0002736828,0.0005298261,0.0011322467,0.0002111167,0.000053417116,0.0006991935,0.0013630849],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008617658,0.00010634029,0.0034609283,0.0030727647,0.00052550266,0.0004884783,0.11629558,0.0001978925,0.000009519388,0.19654182,0.38261795,0.2966746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013331466,0.00001450527,0.007491719,0.0026622687,0.0002680942,0.00006651926,0.001277616,0.00002882491,9.713293e-7,0.00036590488,0.9873554,0.000334862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6473961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78713435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60473746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017220367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019230538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948682131","doi":"","title":"THE CHANGING FAMILY, RIGHTS DISCOURSE AND THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Family law; Common law; Public law; Jurisprudence; Fundamental rights; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.02986626369755888,"score_gpt":0.293839664566131,"score_spread":0.2639734008685721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948682131","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024359751,0.3206354,5.905222e-7,0.6014328,0.00036108505,0.0014552065,0.000021982409,0.000011670541,0.051721506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8736034,0.11741514,0.0000035522683,0.003734304,0.00017863524,0.0000401026,0.0000010953138,0.0000060493326,0.005017709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985185,0.00040264503,0.00017784955,0.000100954094,0.00033740068,0.00046263586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908364,0.0003383107,0.000090572976,0.00020846883,0.000094990864,0.0001840348],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018281617,0.00010053831,0.00022769294,0.000008867374,0.004314152,0.000055350905,0.00045255385,0.000023876657,0.000065525506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003140187,0.000038421313,0.000060187438,0.00024029693,0.0011513493,0.000048719303,0.000040053572,0.00012317074,0.0000059281524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012994554,0.0000065978743,0.0011227255,0.00024551648,0.00026897143,0.000026809494,0.04862254,0.0000034045504,0.000001463469,0.6355274,0.28544444,0.028717158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008535926,0.0000021181893,0.0017576468,0.00027260397,0.000058027334,0.0000016672767,0.0052128923,0.000006040193,3.5939354e-7,0.00051838945,0.992012,0.0000728726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9961291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84924364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003630835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006850394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949095073","doi":"","title":"Renewing the Senate under the Section 44 Amending Formula","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Constitution; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.06090359026998563,"score_gpt":0.32955439957297933,"score_spread":0.2686508093029937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949095073","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13842,0.2534288,0.000047129666,0.4792584,0.005843457,0.0048846267,0.000051974224,0.00021268908,0.11785298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91904706,0.042543463,0.000036712005,0.03481858,0.0017479073,0.00008238618,0.0000074087147,0.000014587738,0.0017018872],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984499,0.00035705845,0.0002110677,0.00019734188,0.0002721007,0.00051249005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993044,0.00009305878,0.00009399128,0.00021500378,0.00007540927,0.0002181385],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011164913,0.00013548748,0.00017597922,0.000020450145,0.0036055406,0.000119448014,0.0003663283,0.000045577748,0.0007091846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000087686196,0.00007289189,0.00010946724,0.0003774445,0.0004939391,0.00021472135,0.000040724393,0.00017484631,0.00015176892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005591315,0.000017717934,0.0035633007,0.00037885163,0.00045992507,0.000013163051,0.043713402,0.000007098299,0.0001286724,0.015246775,0.8235641,0.11290142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004959633,0.000011270316,0.0010173222,0.000555119,0.00007588609,0.0000023432124,0.012766861,0.000005169226,0.000016306212,0.00022633374,0.98514456,0.00012922905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6582283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91203827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7806271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011566932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019779382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99769163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949321733","doi":"","title":"Raising The Bar: A Risk Assessment Checklist When Supervised Access Is Being Considered in Child Custody Disputes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Permission; Checklist; Raising (metalworking); Law; Child custody; Psychology; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.09081052179752669,"score_gpt":0.4151050533864316,"score_spread":0.3242945315889049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949321733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7736523,0.0007470612,0.00008264403,0.10145882,0.00036129408,0.000738959,0.0000067945834,0.00012723864,0.12282485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966311,0.00020948263,0.00055662787,0.00071553816,0.00027745764,0.000043145934,0.0000029163568,0.000014281442,0.0015494573],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774784,0.0005604643,0.00023593457,0.00031363912,0.0006466747,0.0004954546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988784,0.00040367563,0.00014011303,0.00022478699,0.00017934912,0.00017363176],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013874444,0.00018915535,0.0002834232,0.00003462663,0.0013249748,0.0005130063,0.00052376685,0.00009916812,0.00023495257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012276863,0.00012601996,0.00008761315,0.00029269556,0.00047891075,0.00048967835,0.00030818454,0.0003836215,0.00003457397],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018731162,0.00008305188,0.21553673,0.0000146547145,0.00009004559,0.000013549866,0.75711393,0.00006065262,0.000041356772,0.0038363275,0.020403016,0.0027879565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002797205,0.00005841356,0.3600864,0.00023788157,0.00014404133,0.000003036781,0.43655312,0.0011836328,0.0003036494,0.009308963,0.18841997,0.0009036645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09051626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019449912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32056078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045968965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016553602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951516196","doi":"10.24908/fede.v20i1.13222","title":"The Charter of Rights and Freedoms: Undermining Parliamentary Sovereignty and Federalism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federalism-E","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Parliamentary sovereignty; Federalism; Charter; Parliament; Sovereignty; Law; Political science; Politics; Democracy; Bill of rights; Supreme court; Autonomy; Popular sovereignty; Public administration; Constitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.018585325360108446,"score_gpt":0.27548232395734273,"score_spread":0.2568969985972343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951516196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9638203,0.0012153371,0.0000017786368,0.006810338,0.00036087036,0.00039816854,0.0000093767,0.00003853476,0.02734532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962651,0.00033608382,0.00012431083,0.00047516852,0.00017273503,0.000012587883,0.0000028649897,0.000007796707,0.0026033383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873394,0.00015567707,0.00021247663,0.00023760667,0.00033096905,0.00032933828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927545,0.000321247,0.000120349345,0.00012189357,0.000067114976,0.00009393176],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034379947,0.00014457309,0.00023062211,0.0000148805775,0.0019406562,0.00025865692,0.00014443794,0.0000875941,0.00017069752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004108499,0.00009001114,0.0000505339,0.00006139588,0.0006583124,0.00027568673,0.000118613716,0.00012180123,0.00001527639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001487824,0.00011914592,0.07851839,0.0001384754,0.0006260017,0.000015041809,0.27719164,0.0000050614485,0.0011018477,0.5921917,0.039617065,0.010326837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044653276,0.00038053576,0.15663506,0.0003552564,0.00016067967,0.000013844158,0.2186014,0.00024651643,0.0008890029,0.18010306,0.4366492,0.0015001103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023964219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006707556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41208863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059581344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000220888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952703545","doi":"10.29173/alr2520","title":"The Tin Ear of the Court: Ktunaxa Nation and the Foundation of the Duty to Consult","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Duty; Sovereignty; Political science; Jurisprudence; Jurisdiction; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02134618685211727,"score_gpt":0.3058841914587804,"score_spread":0.2845380046066631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952703545","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3051187,0.04689586,0.0000015999962,0.47134575,0.001223355,0.007905895,0.000008305045,0.000015051436,0.16748548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97857994,0.01570182,0.00000853699,0.0018358276,0.000039768453,0.000038340644,5.8164574e-7,0.0000039023316,0.0037912678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855006,0.0006232284,0.00025207913,0.00010115731,0.0003556439,0.000117857686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976526,0.0015942764,0.0002677386,0.0002490118,0.00021725851,0.00001911288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013391896,0.00007308893,0.00020351198,0.0000021247054,0.00082584686,0.00003481319,0.00038104976,0.000030487088,0.00006293982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022333995,0.000024427238,0.00010147669,0.00023408396,0.0008307327,0.000072065974,0.00013128504,0.000083198705,0.0000431033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015840687,0.000014941893,0.0046160864,0.00028039847,0.00007211463,1.0864727e-8,0.013655417,0.0000015959247,0.000043372558,0.9704234,0.003460772,0.0074160392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022686803,0.0000089036985,0.009893545,0.0006732025,0.000086033215,2.4903986e-7,0.00089970254,0.0000060268203,0.00007047108,0.0006456054,0.9874297,0.00005972392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033401646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047746435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9839689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003715465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035979625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97303504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953615714","doi":"10.82308/7567","title":"Religiously discordant, legally consistent, and ethically ambiguous: The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario's approach to conscientious objection","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Conscientious objector; Conscience; Political science; Law; Beneficence; Autonomy; Jurisprudence; Consistency (knowledge bases); Economic Justice; Sociology; Philosophy; Spanish Civil War","score_opus":0.03217675930829157,"score_gpt":0.3104745099938368,"score_spread":0.27829775068554524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953615714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9433842,0.000035036257,0.000013011857,0.0027458735,0.00018283592,0.0009097225,0.00006807392,0.000002337984,0.052658956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920289,0.000026247419,0.0028846087,0.00009186438,0.000022561628,0.000021966562,0.0000022622091,0.0000053474864,0.0049162544],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877304,0.00013968628,0.00026506235,0.000288528,0.00031551172,0.00021819565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917233,0.00018338418,0.0001821326,0.00016263833,0.00022264263,0.000076899676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009993601,0.00011350569,0.00029604288,0.000026726324,0.0007770952,0.00011743966,0.00030193568,0.00008053489,0.000045876015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003498432,0.00007832337,0.00005506549,0.00023670949,0.0016144298,0.00016265095,0.00025015403,0.00026089328,0.0000028531267],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035863364,0.0011167545,0.089874,0.00008295378,0.00053897174,0.000013222282,0.7612651,0.000021039375,0.0653155,0.037991878,0.010591904,0.032830045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021236069,0.0004893884,0.4747064,0.00020756284,0.0003950491,0.000033844633,0.13623647,0.00004103222,0.0043811123,0.0011448663,0.37934062,0.0009000354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34167534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80200344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6250286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005697501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032299358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6627085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953789955","doi":"10.82308/26611","title":"Law at L'Arche : reflections from a critical legal pluralist perspective","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive dissonance; Perspective (graphical); Normative; Sociology; Order (exchange); Everyday life; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Art; Philosophy; Visual arts; Business","score_opus":0.06535000660329707,"score_gpt":0.3631404626925198,"score_spread":0.2977904560892227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953789955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48448887,0.00027491077,0.0000014030334,0.0025042235,0.0009403257,0.00042938546,0.0005904726,0.00045205164,0.51031834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895264,0.000079150486,0.001873884,0.0013225032,0.00039387157,0.000053339518,0.000019963556,0.000057476023,0.006673398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950764,0.0007335583,0.0005858069,0.0009921966,0.0012387516,0.0013732639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99610335,0.0017271206,0.00015434639,0.00040446006,0.00087694335,0.0007337893],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017029193,0.00045545533,0.00049847073,0.000099956436,0.010405288,0.00022013769,0.0006266398,0.0004664976,0.0009750717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004973425,0.00043081783,0.0003841178,0.00075759063,0.0017402546,0.0014032415,0.0004563307,0.0011892775,0.00071900734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010053334,0.00016283062,0.00010510293,0.000007170235,0.00013226653,0.00008338592,0.00087734807,0.0000018652506,0.014826813,0.98177844,0.000039409697,0.0018848206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006786649,0.000107419655,0.0034058164,0.000056712575,0.00014127236,0.000011788971,0.023775537,0.0000018575325,0.013988869,0.07200328,0.8849681,0.00086069905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19010855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43595263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9097752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062003965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047223435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954590437","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1372","title":"Chief Justice McLachlin and the Division of Powers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Federalism; Economic Justice; Political science; CLARITY; Rigour; Judicial review; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027869817210957087,"score_gpt":0.32689943396874566,"score_spread":0.29902961675778855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954590437","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060886603,0.62184787,0.000017828708,0.066295244,0.0011047911,0.0038351198,0.000017001477,0.00009947995,0.24589609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83668524,0.16015096,0.00009434685,0.0017940965,0.000073110714,0.000015448304,0.0000018760337,0.0000068243003,0.0011780732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856293,0.00037521028,0.00025912572,0.00017287034,0.00042163598,0.00020822547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990592,0.0004113822,0.0001365267,0.00018722782,0.0001466774,0.000058981248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015916604,0.0001084586,0.0004027763,0.000005750134,0.00041489836,0.000027364375,0.00025085703,0.00004757928,0.000333514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054846134,0.00005873395,0.00012063407,0.00014515087,0.00075593125,0.00013781323,0.000113562885,0.0001179955,0.00010332683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026262232,0.000046560042,0.0019020666,0.004210614,0.000109466055,9.63306e-7,0.011027543,0.0000018964623,0.000065110224,0.9653104,0.009759981,0.007539171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005179742,0.000024889621,0.0017122489,0.0019062938,0.00024431673,3.9131763e-7,0.001466684,0.000008688551,0.000009024021,0.00058528286,0.9933822,0.00014200916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033629148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007086941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9836222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037831574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024023722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50837433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954595328","doi":"","title":"2001. 04. 060. Тэтли У. Канадcкая оценка американской теории и практики международного частного права в свете американской правовой и социальной систем. Tetley W. A Canadian looks at American conflict of law theory and practice, especially in the light of the American legal and social systems (corrective vs. distributive justice) // Columbia J. of transn. Law. N. Y. , 1999. Vol. 35, №2. P. 299 373","year":2001,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Сер. 4, Государство и право: Реферативный журнал","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Distributive justice; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.021521986222681828,"score_gpt":0.29455999293048535,"score_spread":0.27303800670780354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954595328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87569827,0.011271158,0.000074911164,0.019854777,0.004987583,0.010860727,0.008434611,0.0003280779,0.0684899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829776,0.0059758592,0.00022253903,0.0035865942,0.0019218931,0.0005651907,0.00025537302,0.00043113236,0.0040637874],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96554774,0.012884717,0.0061322167,0.0039612344,0.005357891,0.006116186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733172,0.009184592,0.008989621,0.0026750134,0.0037205447,0.0021130217],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0121746985,0.0034385265,0.00730154,0.00084950693,0.0067913635,0.0013773912,0.0049054595,0.0016365919,0.00070190005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052456963,0.0029745016,0.0020279936,0.0056588575,0.028265174,0.0021621406,0.0017143906,0.0040910793,0.00007134527],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018416535,0.0069069993,0.07110646,0.0044923746,0.009962389,0.0012629348,0.5640816,0.0003652218,0.008111699,0.23120351,0.06428599,0.019804284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008683926,0.0036642815,0.15104373,0.0022271727,0.007460359,0.00061085966,0.2624385,0.00030311156,0.001571589,0.0016029208,0.55478126,0.00561225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8164474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9018257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4904953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004069617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034972532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954618050","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Crown's Duty to Consult Indigenous Nations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Indigenous Policy Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Crown (dentistry); Duty; Political science; History; Law; Medicine; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.034652781082583184,"score_gpt":0.3764283289887701,"score_spread":0.3417755479061869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954618050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57477486,0.00031814838,0.000058733956,0.11604818,0.004583158,0.0009689398,0.00016654622,0.00010530797,0.3029761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763274,0.00030390033,0.00026500598,0.0028673874,0.0073020104,0.000028013812,0.000004539537,0.000017009685,0.012884732],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723595,0.00019135527,0.0003897171,0.00019005271,0.0010094118,0.0009834862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99657094,0.00037734292,0.00020566478,0.0001366417,0.0019525477,0.0007568872],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011160894,0.00016769425,0.000140167,0.00043998603,0.020128129,0.0012664129,0.001216087,0.00013437198,0.00031689482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035060202,0.00012246404,0.00011742145,0.00064646953,0.00082612917,0.0002884803,0.000089345376,0.00042230662,0.00082418416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005315341,0.00009431391,0.019151738,0.0000018083272,0.0005788657,0.000066536006,0.80596125,0.00003302091,0.00007822223,0.1196731,0.029708797,0.024599163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001955505,0.00006876722,0.040748585,0.000015241263,0.000010486121,0.000074348434,0.007479794,0.0000021280457,0.000059569225,0.0030268342,0.9481215,0.00019720371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78174543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97223556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9184127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043767663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044058748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962550307","doi":"","title":"Safe Havens or Dangerous Waters? A Phenomenological Study of Abused Women's Experiences in the Family Courts of Ontario","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Criminology; Thematic analysis; Child abuse; Narrative; Grounded theory; Psychology; Qualitative research; Political science; Social psychology; Poison control; Sociology; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Social science; Environmental health","score_opus":0.0565875361796769,"score_gpt":0.32577708060183114,"score_spread":0.26918954442215426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962550307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97207856,0.000061147635,5.302964e-7,0.00007704116,0.00039250895,0.0010821038,0.0000021406688,0.00002127849,0.026284665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877169,0.000042574116,0.00005857082,0.00005086954,0.00006353834,0.0006942644,0.00001394976,0.000008037708,0.01135129],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971916,0.00047856924,0.00059894106,0.0003533184,0.00094426627,0.00043327388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874246,0.00041238786,0.00040169584,0.00019931518,0.00018947395,0.00005464723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008779271,0.00026106843,0.00073273067,0.00006596579,0.0003755943,0.00005106217,0.00071413984,0.00024203086,0.0006098596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026123118,0.0001274099,0.000084931045,0.00022598883,0.00035100043,0.00009566453,0.000042250966,0.0002772873,0.0000058451737],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017595413,0.0005598832,0.0042226347,0.000024287547,0.00006856886,0.000006312414,0.9939807,0.0000027791789,0.000028372206,0.00015411663,0.00016022321,0.0006161599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047452055,0.00069616287,0.060550235,0.000032615062,0.000027738655,7.431583e-8,0.932304,3.5368035e-7,0.000011268304,0.00003999476,0.005685325,0.00017768025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35903427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7893156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4302813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061570585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027041338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66775346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962753507","doi":"","title":"Guides: Canadian Law: Historical","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0837705783029093,"score_gpt":0.33300610988485996,"score_spread":0.24923553158195066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962753507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000137112,0.0057485094,0.0000010183117,0.03280496,0.0051572565,0.00035870392,0.00006322225,0.00022771781,0.9556249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002558302,0.001096528,0.0007507387,0.0038941966,0.0057157716,0.000045572255,0.00008482068,0.000040559793,0.9858135],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970622,0.00021701709,0.00037018984,0.00042666975,0.0010285149,0.000895426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977648,0.00015128222,0.0001275627,0.0002387086,0.00065478444,0.0010628293],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079785084,0.00031604932,0.0005459247,0.00008417977,0.0015094485,0.00018706208,0.00074437767,0.0007855068,0.0025327962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001301064,0.00024948074,0.00019389647,0.00023037902,0.00044807335,0.00018685579,0.00010319432,0.00045946866,0.0012119743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.753626e-7,0.000006691311,0.0000455999,0.000010000807,0.000041461048,0.000016106795,0.006942251,2.518345e-7,8.985033e-8,0.05016796,0.94213593,0.00063286396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007498045,0.000015229697,0.000022210674,0.000026886519,0.000038480586,4.0347823e-7,0.0038364052,4.0781032e-7,3.419674e-7,0.0012562018,0.9943391,0.00038935416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99827707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99713665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05220315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016197504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021964582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963028133","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Law at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Indigenous; Law; Political science; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.015284115282293956,"score_gpt":0.2568453366415863,"score_spread":0.24156122135929237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963028133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8228923,0.00089055026,2.7740342e-7,0.003994915,0.00061932986,0.0005091833,0.00003513988,0.00003671038,0.17102157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97027785,0.00005981873,0.0000351293,0.001280032,0.00020498138,0.000016716516,0.0000046952478,0.000011057798,0.028109733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804735,0.00018167232,0.0002317379,0.00022245676,0.0007951546,0.0005216337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902064,0.0002326482,0.00013107709,0.0002793977,0.00016806975,0.00016815965],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004953082,0.00014087051,0.000248896,0.000006267308,0.0015147204,0.00005643054,0.00048310816,0.00009065559,0.0015603722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012263002,0.000093700015,0.0000854403,0.00015361483,0.00050125486,0.00016472163,0.00015854737,0.00020349325,0.0002720279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010045566,0.0001653224,0.1677076,0.00013923492,0.0005333157,0.00003001982,0.094493456,0.00025813107,0.0033057272,0.57327956,0.15927114,0.0007160343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026707994,0.000028869148,0.014304845,0.000021172209,0.000019976267,7.2055695e-7,0.0068875444,0.0000017547105,0.0010440331,0.00043676826,0.9767828,0.00020442912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97910625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8175117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000747513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003888947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963430694","doi":"","title":"Some Facts Concerning Life Insurance in South-Western Saskatchewan1","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Agriculture","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Life insurance; Actuarial science; Business","score_opus":0.03060149809904214,"score_gpt":0.2742580308001101,"score_spread":0.24365653270106793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963430694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98896927,0.0011885591,0.000009064941,0.005708796,0.0019214754,0.0004392897,0.000059880338,0.00017744063,0.0015262159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95659006,0.00005158889,0.000053362375,0.00018898744,0.00072834594,0.000035648252,0.0000065631953,0.000008460634,0.042336985],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971823,0.00022552155,0.00032527267,0.00064200227,0.00085893995,0.00076595694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891883,0.00015028846,0.00019023237,0.00019859131,0.00024792223,0.00029415154],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007872334,0.00023112088,0.00030126516,0.00005559916,0.0013548147,0.00037801123,0.0005421279,0.0002089917,0.00010262405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072172907,0.0001174075,0.000116111216,0.0007379317,0.0009938142,0.00089528965,0.00014235164,0.00021495092,0.00060840184],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021221222,0.000114685856,0.5308844,0.000030710416,0.000056222416,0.000023288821,0.41382095,0.000025456646,0.027488653,0.0029012044,0.021167582,0.0034656613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090096815,0.000019627196,0.6590179,0.00026900382,0.000012871404,7.3665086e-7,0.064665,0.0000010132005,0.00091963215,0.000447075,0.27312848,0.00061764556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095418276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009470273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34915596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032477174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015462449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963500614","doi":"","title":"\"DEBUNKING\" PARENTS' RIGHTS IN THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Context (archaeology); Fundamental rights; International human rights law; State (computer science); Embodied cognition; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07374014167730078,"score_gpt":0.31261404904336976,"score_spread":0.23887390736606898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963500614","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010109693,0.11744624,3.8091056e-7,0.4425399,0.0006105289,0.0025588863,0.000097098055,0.000034535344,0.42660275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732456,0.0062500923,0.000007255553,0.01937912,0.00016907528,0.00007145285,0.000011319001,0.0000030343733,0.0008630306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805725,0.00055809127,0.00022517345,0.00016660772,0.00040836458,0.0005845059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904805,0.00014890559,0.000058018297,0.00020623858,0.000120350494,0.00041842848],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011300135,0.0001343178,0.0002351351,0.000039992847,0.0057366686,0.000075858516,0.0006644626,0.00007370597,0.0007089425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040829217,0.00007169654,0.000094519855,0.00036951795,0.0023492756,0.000109331835,0.00001341227,0.0002746248,0.0005420538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.333999e-7,0.000007286078,0.0059276097,0.000039462804,0.000027634209,0.00010763563,0.015940746,9.831726e-7,6.3884876e-8,0.83177036,0.1445251,0.0016525186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069983296,0.0000039042043,0.013340021,0.000308036,0.000018547074,0.00001354962,0.000557165,4.4721793e-7,1.1756361e-7,0.00053382997,0.98503536,0.00011906731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99814945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9631359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016702219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027467685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963809417","doi":"10.29173/alr2549","title":"The Right to Be Heard: Representative Authority as a Requirement in Enforcing Métis Consultation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Duty; Honour; Law; Statute; Corporate governance; Indigenous; Political science; Public administration; Business; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.044674300662804645,"score_gpt":0.3861197916134548,"score_spread":0.34144549095065013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963809417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08441041,0.032393076,0.000004265683,0.2848624,0.00083057553,0.0070145717,0.0000056947692,0.000055540702,0.59042346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91745347,0.04020782,0.00023525281,0.010564577,0.00012277893,0.0004538395,0.000010732774,0.000015660933,0.030935856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979001,0.0005929746,0.00037648474,0.0002911473,0.00045294914,0.00038629372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978426,0.0015494907,0.00013383402,0.00021548787,0.00015490038,0.00010368643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015456141,0.00012821503,0.0003193821,0.000009911729,0.00082794466,0.00008660947,0.00024741775,0.000047471432,0.00040983476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002743734,0.00008032523,0.00009014723,0.00039573808,0.00018832771,0.00025476047,0.00011208826,0.0001346792,0.0006878036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015280979,0.000027192786,0.0017987911,0.00024647242,0.000056271787,0.0000029511868,0.045484122,0.0000028518136,0.000035744353,0.9363609,0.011900816,0.0040685823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016500786,0.000030184488,0.0012596701,0.0008441091,0.000024913537,4.3570262e-7,0.0029429968,0.0000025864383,0.000044203447,0.0005192067,0.9940269,0.00013976828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2608605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23645648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9821261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030380313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057962723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8840553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964870267","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0037","title":"Section 7: The Right to Life, Liberty, and Security of the Person","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Charter; Political science; Law; Liberalism; State (computer science); Social security; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.031375601243637266,"score_gpt":0.23977877363860955,"score_spread":0.2084031723949723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964870267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026524067,0.00010496294,0.0000018223708,0.0014917721,0.00038624142,0.0006155776,0.000050620183,0.000031813255,0.9946648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06382127,0.0003592642,0.000011169115,0.00006917121,0.00026861398,8.8213113e-7,9.3792715e-7,0.000009508771,0.9354592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903804,0.00009668334,0.00008298602,0.00023923165,0.00035815532,0.0001849181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990908,0.0001005543,0.0002482344,0.00030532203,0.00014745454,0.00010763403],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001922704,0.00017536237,0.00023391632,0.000023206981,0.0026662324,0.00007425258,0.00068209344,0.00025951033,0.000027215345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000069165595,0.00010882019,0.00015945912,0.0000058921205,0.0010039053,0.000092731185,0.000492565,0.00032837442,4.32899e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074646174,0.000010035611,0.0001336093,0.00006184681,0.0002925497,0.0000063107886,0.08071958,0.0000013655517,0.000012034556,0.9008513,0.015389636,0.0024470477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012437455,0.000018043002,0.00055651413,0.00007431391,0.0001308099,3.6876406e-7,0.0015814233,0.0000018635859,0.000021509735,0.0005065504,0.9968347,0.00014951116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007600762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009460768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9814451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015840604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000718495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964931682","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0045","title":"Feminist Constitutionalism in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Autonomy; Constitution; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Law; Constitutional law; Fundamental rights; Democracy; Human rights; Sociology; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.0427673660870517,"score_gpt":0.2491853511249828,"score_spread":0.2064179850379311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964931682","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006653402,0.00009051828,0.0000015108592,0.00026438557,0.00039845303,0.00031026316,0.00018105865,0.000030908865,0.9986564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019539397,0.0004051034,0.000046522586,0.00006905065,0.00013399676,7.558806e-7,0.000012388459,0.000008962128,0.97978383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987848,0.00003918403,0.00012902867,0.00029253715,0.0004505877,0.00030389414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924856,0.00009412019,0.0002193402,0.00022059762,0.00007289458,0.00014448668],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011060068,0.00021210728,0.00031516555,0.000036598987,0.0014347056,0.00005885234,0.00062435644,0.00023876566,0.000064257234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004332337,0.00023270443,0.00009347463,0.0000029481766,0.001081625,0.00006823746,0.000250918,0.00033628583,0.0000011582292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013801479,0.0000021216854,0.00013327257,0.000010830629,0.00005369026,0.00022284896,0.0015529743,0.0000013125757,1.7169576e-7,0.99190176,0.0051907618,0.0009164488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002379154,0.0000037527952,0.00013771445,0.00009994166,0.00003979425,6.8381627e-7,0.0009781618,0.0000015314857,8.530279e-7,0.0004850794,0.99773264,0.00028190666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.970563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9924157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9925419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025566854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022264742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965910019","doi":"","title":"Pour une réforme du droit de la famille fondée sur les réalités sociales et juridiques actuelles","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"EspaceINRS (National Institute for Scientific Research (Canada))","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08710542111540506,"score_gpt":0.37213294390016033,"score_spread":0.2850275227847553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965910019","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36737186,0.0033349192,0.0003178897,0.548643,0.0068454063,0.0021010316,0.0016674622,0.00008794533,0.069630496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8666343,0.0009011423,0.0012205893,0.00037831487,0.00086526625,0.00016581143,0.00024183196,0.000040584324,0.12955213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902663,0.0015020249,0.0005922657,0.0010041838,0.0049260943,0.0017091294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98963165,0.005202035,0.00026907423,0.0003108463,0.0040646363,0.0005217719],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011581674,0.0004228195,0.0005197426,0.00024376779,0.005705376,0.0011692138,0.0012113595,0.00037307403,0.00047229248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008156985,0.0004069196,0.00028284025,0.0017321082,0.005792924,0.001375055,0.0004016437,0.000850707,0.00008161479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003994069,0.00015563263,0.0015009014,0.00017357907,0.00016808618,0.000014160573,0.003579029,0.0012816703,0.00045627335,0.6870385,0.30377147,0.0018207758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006787095,0.000049037302,0.0078036045,0.00018824807,0.000021904267,0.0000035350529,0.009607153,0.0013311254,0.0004148636,0.038427096,0.9409962,0.00047849363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9562773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6486114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0091432845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041773967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966131801","doi":"","title":"Broken Trust: Finding Our Way Out of the Damaged Relationship Through the Rebuilding of Indigenous Legal Institutions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Colonialism; Genocide; Indigenous rights; Political science; Law; Sociology; Constitution; Racism; Human rights; Politics; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.0735731297173332,"score_gpt":0.3658860709121214,"score_spread":0.2923129411947882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966131801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96896476,0.0010001579,0.00033256193,0.013299663,0.0007819497,0.00034924955,0.000005774467,0.00001603717,0.015249846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950625,0.00095089583,0.00008596002,0.000026097576,0.0004037961,0.0000053326057,4.2424452e-7,0.000008164024,0.003456875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974637,0.0003750649,0.00036156323,0.0001291001,0.0005547254,0.0011158289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985062,0.00015312815,0.000796032,0.00032004254,0.00018578481,0.000038836726],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026779703,0.00012292824,0.00020961213,0.000027444066,0.010905295,0.00016497586,0.0012288126,0.00010661221,0.000006303802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002494296,0.00006863976,0.00022299566,0.00015178477,0.0006649617,0.00066457165,0.00015297264,0.0016777714,0.0000047189587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016400767,0.00004451554,0.13372809,0.000007018039,0.00022578835,8.6345665e-7,0.09146328,0.0001428013,0.0003052916,0.772477,0.0001641764,0.0014247954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012289616,0.00015719011,0.5262729,0.00021246323,0.00032218837,0.00003798728,0.2961525,0.000011593489,0.0006156127,0.14547607,0.02909655,0.00041601394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010363468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048992936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6270009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010226555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019824866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966633239","doi":"","title":"Historical Infringements of Aboriginal Rights: Sui Generis as a Tool to Ignore the Past","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Supreme court; Law; Statutory law; Indigenous; Economic Justice; Political science; High Court; Faith; Human rights; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02444947449560265,"score_gpt":0.3442519138024815,"score_spread":0.31980243930687885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966633239","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28857672,0.267974,0.0000066426514,0.009184426,0.0019011338,0.0037272067,0.000033520464,0.000074943084,0.42852142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90187067,0.094450735,0.00013266508,0.0017072287,0.0004856334,0.00012814568,0.000010141969,0.0000148041745,0.0011999597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983867,0.000088693945,0.00046319832,0.0002064324,0.0005762492,0.000278753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992061,0.00003865336,0.00024676215,0.00021019042,0.00019619611,0.000102049766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000629435,0.00015571095,0.00047096383,0.000011760263,0.0003659139,0.000020597905,0.00031179248,0.00004352482,0.00008839033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024473757,0.00007975399,0.00014603847,0.00020319251,0.0002642664,0.00016430515,0.00010264977,0.00012523348,0.000039575363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012417782,0.000076037795,0.0015443777,0.0023758828,0.000050018825,4.135867e-7,0.0028681809,1.2204261e-7,0.000014622045,0.9779102,0.003191436,0.011956256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014847699,0.000080716985,0.0007444943,0.0016739382,0.00005352756,3.7689935e-7,0.00016461148,2.0059487e-7,0.000017849492,0.00032399676,0.99666405,0.00012779044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026094649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002626583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9934726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039713667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035568304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98039067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967130248","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v30i2.1701","title":"‘CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION? INTERPRETATION, (MIS)CALCULATION, WRONGS RIGHTED OR REACTION &amp; REITERATION’","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Referendum; Aotearoa; Law; Political science; Entitlement (fair division); Context (archaeology); Politics; Brexit; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; European union; History","score_opus":0.05316565827189108,"score_gpt":0.34108904335866214,"score_spread":0.28792338508677107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967130248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.781815,0.0010519477,0.0022024994,0.061139006,0.0049110497,0.0017837558,0.000006915295,0.00025590643,0.14683394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99437094,0.00008414993,0.0002362317,0.000758441,0.0010284723,0.000019612382,0.000005387751,0.0000061646015,0.0034906305],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834746,0.00048198705,0.0002964315,0.00013053174,0.00049727375,0.00024632004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987287,0.00035848533,0.00028212517,0.00014236217,0.00042723762,0.00006106938],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014029293,0.000113242546,0.00012935516,0.00002530454,0.005039061,0.00047481715,0.00028528186,0.000072551746,0.00033511053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035993988,0.00005312135,0.00008808297,0.00025369608,0.0005034039,0.0008445066,0.000031901636,0.00037093728,0.0002860587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003106216,0.000069230664,0.010558599,0.000018788784,0.00037676745,0.000009674988,0.48523346,0.00038772274,0.0014331181,0.47796765,0.015375184,0.00825918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061875896,0.000045258294,0.02231907,0.00018319912,0.00011454436,0.000091730886,0.021464845,0.000508612,0.000050921884,0.0029875222,0.95133924,0.00027627315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004316551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009779982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9359641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003012944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057752644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99625623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967599921","doi":"10.4324/9780203720028-7","title":"Judging gender: difference and dissent at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.041261172417284574,"score_gpt":0.2622390219272764,"score_spread":0.2209778495099918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967599921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015630983,0.0016313617,0.0000023603864,0.007585624,0.0002522238,0.00045579753,0.000026933692,0.000022820874,0.9743919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30520245,0.0008617476,0.00001918074,0.00012205307,0.00009715406,0.000006993947,0.0000028624488,0.000008561205,0.693679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986457,0.000031720865,0.00020445474,0.00022151826,0.0006253755,0.00027121723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992012,0.00025899766,0.00015178016,0.00014124998,0.00013676712,0.00011003437],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014397781,0.00019592744,0.00028922028,0.00000906103,0.00090341974,0.000038861166,0.00022379014,0.000116322015,0.002538014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006327597,0.00010771226,0.000060074115,0.00001315628,0.0007064564,0.000036047248,0.00022989769,0.00015605919,0.0000117449945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009173281,0.000012577139,0.0051927255,0.00013500072,0.00047814465,0.000008641843,0.0378099,0.0000023484085,0.00013447527,0.7301966,0.21984954,0.0061708954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018506254,0.000019662235,0.03850423,0.00012853745,0.00014268617,0.0000015471533,0.013783513,0.000019790723,0.000059080492,0.006984769,0.9394398,0.0007313372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8350483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96450514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7232118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042441554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017940499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2968700249","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0039","title":"Equality and Anti-discrimination","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Supreme court; Law; Government (linguistics); Political science; State (computer science); Mathematics; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.07629487764963126,"score_gpt":0.29370194859290794,"score_spread":0.21740707094327666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2968700249","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004134442,0.00012608543,0.000016077982,0.00026967085,0.0001881749,0.00034915004,0.000063319814,0.00008987651,0.9984842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014490371,0.0017650708,0.00008123888,0.000020240026,0.00015818836,4.4362852e-7,0.000010933878,0.000012170261,0.9834613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989044,0.00006810507,0.00010618049,0.00033335737,0.0003495561,0.00023840163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991295,0.000069671485,0.00027033454,0.00023292318,0.00016863599,0.00012893991],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023086913,0.00021068822,0.0003030373,0.00003998522,0.0021389646,0.00013428845,0.00039511043,0.0003554144,0.000030270343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005153911,0.00021679897,0.00011196443,0.000001945707,0.001049664,0.00021090338,0.00037532864,0.00024393106,0.0000011788067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011956924,0.0000039986326,0.000026684453,0.00004174347,0.00007522372,0.000015547457,0.007873453,1.1940871e-7,0.000003599317,0.98232895,0.000940582,0.0086781485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020363026,0.000011089662,0.0004050299,0.00007856252,0.00013010357,2.982219e-7,0.0009861161,0.0000015939297,0.0000065322383,0.0010550999,0.9968474,0.00027455823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054504066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030768602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99590683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023638619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057791407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969098070","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0031","title":"The Justification of Rights Violations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Morality; Democracy; Politics; Proportionality (law); Section (typography); State (computer science); Law and economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Fundamental rights; Human rights; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.050801113420704785,"score_gpt":0.27328588798224135,"score_spread":0.22248477456153656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969098070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006684902,0.000107464526,0.00001948911,0.00023800078,0.00023438875,0.00037610283,0.00004916532,0.000044063203,0.9988645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016667353,0.00085304264,0.000051778272,0.000003004416,0.00013126254,8.118627e-7,0.000007926241,0.0000068715376,0.9822779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991503,0.0000510518,0.00012667768,0.00018642256,0.00031631332,0.00016928243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986913,0.00018021646,0.0004231976,0.00034174224,0.00029951744,0.00006397717],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017177132,0.00013734207,0.0001844564,0.000026297057,0.0044769314,0.000067611385,0.0006731275,0.00023466867,0.000017276669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004459836,0.00010638633,0.00014589303,0.000003016809,0.001216391,0.00010134569,0.00016082573,0.00019211257,0.0000015640952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000126244395,0.000002656628,0.000003714549,0.0000068489176,0.00007865915,0.0000017021066,0.0032291298,6.836471e-7,0.0000030963156,0.99211824,0.0017908638,0.0027517525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000920999,0.0000075972343,0.000098158176,0.000047031797,0.00012678475,7.095285e-8,0.0004056464,0.0000033647123,0.000012967035,0.0040878686,0.99498856,0.00012986972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004091861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00563636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9931977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018700457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000714969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969398275","doi":"10.1093/he/9780191868306.003.0047","title":"Re Amendment to the Constitution of Canada [1981] 1 SCR 753, also known as the Patriation Reference, Supreme Court of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03262084511648393,"score_gpt":0.23383977884056287,"score_spread":0.20121893372407895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969398275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015973346,0.00008504707,0.0000065915747,0.0025477293,0.00043616397,0.0010812343,0.00046210183,0.00001271654,0.9937711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25719446,0.00025083465,0.000019068382,0.00014323539,0.00008192782,0.0000015911704,0.000019778297,0.0000070682095,0.74228203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981192,0.00012697949,0.00024297604,0.0002502177,0.00097338064,0.00028727684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984051,0.00022561279,0.00044994304,0.0003070973,0.00050361274,0.00010862816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031121454,0.00021042088,0.00034613858,0.00002910881,0.0009845884,0.000021883596,0.0006570367,0.00016606525,0.000083021325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007796822,0.00014648345,0.00008612982,0.00002315436,0.00043613242,0.000059197057,0.0002550741,0.00025266028,4.1115123e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084294785,0.0000053106714,0.000038986695,0.000042440195,0.00024283653,0.000006219319,0.006209121,0.00016736006,0.000012175655,0.93553686,0.057063974,0.00059043895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017820955,0.00003102325,0.00010553269,0.00010396158,0.00012657484,1.4205783e-7,0.0070637427,0.0000052654855,0.00006155439,0.00009259677,0.992055,0.00017638889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9913169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93544424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016324595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043393266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76977795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969750881","doi":"","title":"Canada's Chief Justice: Beverley McLachlin's Legacy of Law and Leadership","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04040969613000794,"score_gpt":0.2972481283106816,"score_spread":0.25683843218067365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969750881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7706947,0.020376585,0.0002013449,0.05536887,0.0025123323,0.0006037299,0.000016135407,0.000093129216,0.1501332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99212414,0.0015621624,0.000055347868,0.0006639114,0.0018976222,0.000001661272,6.0435457e-7,0.000009934719,0.0036846385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706846,0.00017258908,0.00023533558,0.00016224787,0.0005171151,0.0018442479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992381,0.00011545708,0.0001688948,0.00007786872,0.00025045974,0.00014926663],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001253763,0.00013229906,0.00021272255,0.000024650579,0.0016114988,0.0000790349,0.00026613037,0.00008476174,0.000052023082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029936034,0.00010746946,0.000056156132,0.00013907466,0.00088394876,0.00031660558,0.00004029308,0.0008418909,0.000005295559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047393518,0.000038382903,0.0014779579,0.000025631332,0.00023204245,0.0000036411154,0.013288105,0.0000016147012,0.0001482954,0.9747154,0.003926585,0.0060949344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017572037,0.00077410706,0.0103098685,0.000111958885,0.00045540798,0.00009255634,0.3214179,0.000018467994,0.0004377967,0.04923058,0.6145949,0.0007992725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7959015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9877687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92548484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001346856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003962418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969897283","doi":"","title":"Individual Choice of Law for Indigenous People in Canada: Reconciling Legal Pluralism with Human Rights?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UC Irvine law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Indigenous; Pluralism (philosophy); Legal pluralism; Human rights; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law; Legal realism; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05001393962651693,"score_gpt":0.3356475473879512,"score_spread":0.2856336077614343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969897283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9350227,0.018928226,0.0000023206478,0.0044397945,0.00034783353,0.0031408712,0.000112513364,0.000058369253,0.03794733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967754,0.00055208604,0.00037173426,0.001431323,0.00038781538,0.000115032555,0.00002586728,0.000013567298,0.0003271855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807835,0.00016805173,0.00048304393,0.00027936895,0.00049844483,0.0004927379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888456,0.00021504505,0.00027034368,0.0001839428,0.00034083423,0.000105267776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000720527,0.00018965564,0.00064663094,0.000015420503,0.0011696628,0.000036981222,0.00040701198,0.00006354401,0.00015076624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012539787,0.00013199676,0.000079464146,0.00029596034,0.00040865014,0.00025111221,0.0000668745,0.00014718137,0.0000055128817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003986491,0.00020496796,0.026243996,0.00435324,0.00040621427,0.000020460153,0.05672052,0.0000031042584,0.0000555532,0.89974535,0.0073350323,0.0048716962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004901944,0.00014199488,0.0076681445,0.001661427,0.00011282964,0.0000013346429,0.0004360708,6.2816144e-7,0.000118314136,0.00021889409,0.9888492,0.0003009502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99685353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98151416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059638673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003997456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8996219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970285074","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Human Rights Act and First Nations Communities","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.022888260059927196,"score_gpt":0.2890834125710401,"score_spread":0.2661951525111129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970285074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63463104,0.00018307744,9.9592235e-8,0.012620941,0.0004494829,0.00026715593,0.000014429414,0.00007171185,0.35176206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99477273,0.00005454691,0.000070714545,0.00018595724,0.00032461327,0.00003792239,0.000006048464,0.0000062396894,0.004541228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990139,0.0001285885,0.00012576659,0.00010297083,0.00025455008,0.00037423047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880826,0.00050262024,0.000046722813,0.00019756056,0.00014169548,0.00030311276],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004463026,0.00010498317,0.00010347204,0.000026150808,0.03981958,0.0005873641,0.00039042943,0.000110870875,0.0003257742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022474577,0.00007033841,0.000041513205,0.00013054839,0.0014477136,0.00026930607,0.00006626993,0.0004395955,0.00009286212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.221818e-7,0.000008899756,0.014961111,0.0000032171456,0.000025554356,0.0000013063116,0.017135732,4.7013506e-7,0.000011314099,0.9644723,0.0032992885,0.00007998822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010094145,0.000007660098,0.04051721,0.000009608878,0.000008660369,4.5426694e-7,0.0041717524,0.0000017357843,0.000014642566,0.0035294583,0.9515178,0.00012007043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97877306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99997836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96094286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016941264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000072927454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96143043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970323928","doi":"","title":"CONFRONTING THE SEXUAL ASSAULT OF TEENAGE GIRLS:: THE MISTAKE OF AGE DEFENCE IN CANADIAN SEXUAL ASSAULT LAW","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Law Foundation of British Columbia","keywords":"Plaintiff; Mistake; Sexual assault; Psychology; Criminology; Law; Criminal code; Poison control; Criminal law; Suicide prevention; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.02481743643834859,"score_gpt":0.2801504322200895,"score_spread":0.2553329957817409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970323928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89823955,0.00071096636,0.000001427863,0.0032732824,0.00034750134,0.0007557764,0.00006820598,0.000032690976,0.096570626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99154896,0.000018258972,0.0001201608,0.000613883,0.00017452594,0.000026759932,0.000007467027,0.00001643233,0.0074735708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967839,0.00057555997,0.0005085347,0.0003628946,0.0009635656,0.0008055102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817455,0.0005845802,0.00029213674,0.00042801586,0.00028737448,0.00023335771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024692276,0.0002241539,0.00042097675,0.000030615403,0.0009249022,0.00012965081,0.0009689116,0.00024639315,0.0002740983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007816044,0.00013831728,0.000091891474,0.00039830894,0.0013539796,0.00029767267,0.00012204453,0.0006737158,0.000091134454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049385897,0.00014073522,0.3661077,0.0001792878,0.00025310877,0.000044389202,0.089324154,0.00032588147,0.006907397,0.5276433,0.00743028,0.0015943842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012105543,0.00015981558,0.22630593,0.00015028544,0.00008495368,0.0000022616298,0.15542877,0.00010257399,0.00072215626,0.00067555805,0.6144265,0.0007306346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96673495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98954576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60699624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035304742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003495831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71136934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970444144","doi":"10.59962/9780774880497","title":"Revisiting the Duty to Consult Aboriginal Peoples","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Geography; History; Genealogy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01764331129471004,"score_gpt":0.24363641030965458,"score_spread":0.22599309901494455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970444144","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062449886,0.0006451245,0.000007459769,0.00035420898,0.0003362126,0.0012359231,0.0005938659,0.00010622409,0.990476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0045705955,0.0010309088,0.00022002746,0.000089811874,0.0004653329,0.0000015889223,0.000015360749,0.00001917705,0.9935872],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997928,0.0002414301,0.00022051744,0.0004518915,0.0007282205,0.00042990924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807125,0.00051905325,0.00034019747,0.00027805523,0.00063023093,0.00016123438],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043170035,0.00015424534,0.00054123526,0.00001976056,0.001531937,0.00035118486,0.0009720146,0.00030858105,0.00027801655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001727287,0.00026107198,0.00024514005,0.000033786422,0.0011131543,0.000101466845,0.00032791,0.0003944106,0.000042655618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030046207,0.000017457509,0.0006317381,0.0004105181,0.00038756384,0.00013497352,0.045605544,0.000006037646,0.0000059628283,0.007834385,0.910153,0.034782823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028854035,0.000019813822,0.002651524,0.0008642489,0.00015672986,0.0000032147732,0.007410273,0.0000012048496,3.397532e-7,0.00008564818,0.98819315,0.0003252836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7136884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7126833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07804023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046776482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007794663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970564397","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.31.2.05","title":"The <i>Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines</i>, Soft Law, and the Procedural Rule of Law","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.029884460921857023,"score_gpt":0.277993477525192,"score_spread":0.24810901660333495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970564397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6069674,0.030898724,0.0000017527001,0.28882194,0.0019024825,0.0007627602,0.00007443894,0.000007541388,0.070562966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96419346,0.0023939963,0.000035113106,0.011665485,0.0006878939,0.000014255973,0.0000012737019,0.000021283375,0.020987218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997231,0.00055892597,0.0008069164,0.00019982494,0.0003513943,0.0008519141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99700123,0.0010183003,0.00065975904,0.00021921837,0.0005067148,0.00059480575],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004564368,0.00026375297,0.00072443055,0.0000259525,0.0016448261,0.0003115274,0.0006811814,0.00014770517,0.0001505008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044053662,0.00013489486,0.00024214466,0.00017272598,0.0074466364,0.0004093141,0.00009335402,0.0005650549,0.000016416236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018547011,0.000010861655,0.00059669535,0.000082496845,0.00027905262,0.00001746658,0.09508956,0.000016669843,0.000005515917,0.89880246,0.0035305338,0.0013831999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040415176,0.00020166366,0.0006921867,0.00026244196,0.0001752147,0.00022513342,0.07105262,0.00006201394,0.000013473744,0.1152197,0.80775326,0.00030075738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09898392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26710534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80422276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003799275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006566514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970692404","doi":"","title":"The revised statutes of New Brunswick","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03602712549478464,"score_gpt":0.31815376691785546,"score_spread":0.2821266414230708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970692404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002298457,0.007738366,0.0000045265087,0.007822927,0.00018765312,0.00049338967,0.0000020018192,0.00007686332,0.9836513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000095384836,0.009413144,0.0003351483,0.00026043778,0.00077679585,0.0000015061241,0.0000054211805,0.000010168244,0.989102],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983759,0.00010030997,0.0003301494,0.00020101173,0.0006537945,0.00033885936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865264,0.00053494336,0.00028333568,0.00019662316,0.00021233576,0.000120098906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045861956,0.00019261506,0.00037178953,0.000015650334,0.00089296646,0.0000919924,0.0005132003,0.00023311625,0.00042991727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005095599,0.00010645944,0.00021342018,0.000084363026,0.00060594926,0.00007972079,0.0000658919,0.00024188079,0.00011035021],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041004087,0.0000046614637,0.000020497748,0.000010495759,0.00005074343,5.6113777e-7,0.005702869,2.2942824e-7,6.000445e-7,0.20862257,0.76659125,0.01899141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093034636,0.000023967254,0.0006520403,0.00007132366,0.00003723612,4.623913e-8,0.0013525953,1.9552182e-7,0.0000041309727,0.010244818,0.98736936,0.00015126161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025255935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04326499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2207781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030283668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002140433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98123497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970712014","doi":"10.5040/9781509914449.ch-013","title":"Cecilia Kell v Canada","year":2019,"lang":"hu","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.03967674830679355,"score_gpt":0.24763263293519538,"score_spread":0.20795588462840184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970712014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012324327,0.00074897276,0.0000020333152,0.010267007,0.007418029,0.0011775966,0.00037482605,0.0002089143,0.97857016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.124704525,0.00014022595,0.00009667079,0.0022792688,0.0026324687,0.000023663202,0.000094611365,0.000114935014,0.86991364],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929568,0.00021890995,0.00099456,0.0013547952,0.0029220418,0.0015528629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99586,0.00071421725,0.0008825585,0.000807411,0.0010388825,0.00069692085],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013020423,0.0010367914,0.0012599473,0.0001147074,0.0023771946,0.0042006555,0.0020094756,0.0011916865,0.0036706342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011656263,0.0009345412,0.0005046194,0.00007500487,0.0008948776,0.001507474,0.00088989554,0.0021129905,0.001035901],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024279603,0.000016985823,0.00037522262,0.00019172196,0.0005121142,0.00008569708,0.015012393,0.0000056298327,0.000045473687,0.38508144,0.5901844,0.008464673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003759721,0.000035528567,0.0006117726,0.0003754463,0.0001467026,0.0000024226665,0.0035376684,0.0000092411965,0.000024485966,0.0008717646,0.9928154,0.0011936453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9325001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96287966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40263098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002527501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036450876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W29715688","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.066","title":"Report on the Oral Arguments of the Appeal in Hupacasath First Nation v The Minister of Foreign Affairs Canada and the Attorney General of Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TDM","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Prime minister; Political science; Foreign policy; Politics","score_opus":0.02684060107857847,"score_gpt":0.25113462015173166,"score_spread":0.2242940190731532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W29715688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95862454,0.00003664156,4.5074194e-7,0.015148019,0.00016474321,0.00036144853,0.000011308415,0.0000015248262,0.025651334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988219,0.000008340699,0.0000063106763,0.00023256759,0.0000540184,0.000013505575,8.107008e-7,0.0000029411997,0.0008595958],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865943,0.00028645518,0.00024005907,0.0000948431,0.0005662386,0.00015299997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990404,0.00042399886,0.00026695034,0.00016529622,0.00008240217,0.000020899124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010360369,0.00007304256,0.0001552959,0.0000052170185,0.00041991562,0.000009525729,0.00025864533,0.0000274911,0.000012371257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059696636,0.00002738946,0.00003687947,0.00011783951,0.000568935,0.000025985668,0.00006661726,0.00008432574,6.0410656e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020752719,0.00008960909,0.6127436,0.00008603597,0.00029296096,0.0000070348324,0.08082437,0.00043386625,0.00012011165,0.24130629,0.062730655,0.0011579535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010487249,0.00004672203,0.900941,0.00008387478,0.000052789543,0.0000021469014,0.043229137,0.0003761851,0.0009881724,0.0015237082,0.05153018,0.00017733972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9952518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99936736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28819743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018950479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032020922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3229694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972230165","doi":"","title":"Feminism after the Critique of Feminism Review of Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Politics; Sociology; Visibility; Feminist philosophy; Gender studies; Feminist theory; Feminist legal theory; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.014713806864333073,"score_gpt":0.30707670279697225,"score_spread":0.2923628959326392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972230165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51912135,0.11808836,0.000086292195,0.04610454,0.00042650648,0.0010087476,0.00003995098,0.000058407884,0.31506583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91705775,0.07949722,0.000019094408,0.0019829134,0.00041258615,0.000030505998,5.524327e-7,0.000014276557,0.0009850984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960436,0.00076408125,0.0005102438,0.00021092308,0.00067640643,0.0017946996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985534,0.00063778396,0.0002556658,0.00017215751,0.0002027805,0.00017821613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047376975,0.00020352875,0.00046566434,0.000046519042,0.0008698405,0.000027279817,0.00037697132,0.00011708393,0.00009800489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066191953,0.00012875795,0.00019113366,0.0002057815,0.0016704779,0.00014821168,0.00007610492,0.0012516563,0.000006469842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113454334,0.000087165026,0.0004539928,0.0001556912,0.000111539994,0.000008288483,0.010252704,6.687875e-8,0.000025105639,0.9879111,0.00018084534,0.0007000274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009991886,0.0013797546,0.0020837525,0.0022348692,0.00014812057,0.00049444026,0.08100453,6.348422e-7,0.00028739203,0.8842,0.026637899,0.00052947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025589266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009734853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3979364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069749827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001183803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66901976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972266157","doi":"10.21991/cf29384","title":"The Crown and Government Formation: Conventions, Practices, Customs, and Norms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Politics; Law; Political science; Convention; Transparency (behavior); Crown (dentistry); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021239921858551752,"score_gpt":0.2886348179734638,"score_spread":0.2673948961149121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972266157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30706754,0.028045826,0.007733845,0.22290874,0.007921221,0.0062879524,0.00057708897,0.0006143982,0.4188434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99364805,0.0022793752,0.00035035834,0.00074508606,0.00013272194,0.00009580388,0.000021058388,0.000005114506,0.0027224415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765825,0.00013420297,0.0004210259,0.00036585698,0.0008207141,0.0005999582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828976,0.000597597,0.00043773244,0.00019609023,0.0002650963,0.0002136955],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008042539,0.00023344936,0.00023331889,0.000031893596,0.0063811215,0.00043700173,0.00023302097,0.00015512033,0.00013934098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010690559,0.00016717939,0.000095342686,0.00019185721,0.007825181,0.0015927431,0.00025148818,0.00026870985,0.00018775093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003307271,0.000030931158,0.040268127,0.00002036958,0.00006953935,0.0000026882622,0.0005635323,0.000012806738,0.000044223932,0.95225704,0.0045737494,0.0021239303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094348576,0.000033116612,0.0053053633,0.000079483056,0.000053575237,0.00006974596,0.029418826,0.00020626419,0.000033641867,0.004772751,0.95877415,0.00030958102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006094129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019267347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9542004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004457473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004353856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99491245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974680420","doi":"10.1080/20403313.2019.1658450","title":"The place of instrumental reasoning in law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Constitution; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Political science; Public law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.012655365649978904,"score_gpt":0.30716618150991737,"score_spread":0.2945108158599385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974680420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9349359,0.00035023072,7.325276e-7,0.0014276656,0.00024332103,0.00022504486,0.0000011779223,0.000016968404,0.06279891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99775404,0.00019376139,0.00013445463,0.00006130923,0.000043087097,0.000009423983,2.2120663e-7,0.000003107444,0.0018005935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902654,0.000110066576,0.00015033701,0.00012514254,0.00035087194,0.00023704104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994705,0.0002732443,0.00008030036,0.00010522614,0.000038329235,0.000032448996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005517369,0.000060734637,0.000108721884,0.000008842906,0.00037068006,0.00004046911,0.00029577131,0.00004674226,0.000045224333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017731165,0.000040394298,0.000036499652,0.00017464055,0.000517752,0.000197764,0.000088108216,0.00011741842,0.000071610564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040488972,0.000048142927,0.35204613,0.000019717867,0.000021329994,0.0000029282635,0.059618257,0.000033380107,0.00096033304,0.5825082,0.00069598114,0.004005123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012156449,0.00014491625,0.48001602,0.00044043915,0.000015899323,0.0000014459367,0.12681752,0.00019380801,0.003744515,0.002155384,0.38468817,0.0005662173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01545098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016143318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5803528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015275794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038967155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976173574","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v37i4.5583","title":"Recognising Multi-textualism: Rethinking New Zealand's Legal History","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty of Waitangi; Treaty; Project commissioning; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Publishing; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.043234437444675825,"score_gpt":0.27235618299210623,"score_spread":0.22912174554743042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2976173574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11047249,0.3879141,0.0007991771,0.037189495,0.021421023,0.007620979,0.000047876147,0.0015728702,0.432962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24062495,0.4444729,0.022839723,0.0034496218,0.0020897281,0.0000014113036,0.00006460947,0.00009901845,0.28635803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820447,0.0003347912,0.00026995188,0.00035042528,0.0005001141,0.0003402261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988058,0.00018133456,0.000356813,0.00022912519,0.0002413464,0.00018555053],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085636956,0.00018424721,0.000570121,0.00003150698,0.0004646937,0.000021599672,0.000478672,0.00016420185,0.0019604743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001247007,0.00018830108,0.0002641448,0.00020447382,0.00032538982,0.0004610225,0.000101786536,0.00027216715,0.00034084715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017701305,0.0003882328,0.006009545,0.0049132775,0.00076024723,0.00007325755,0.26635322,0.000038386508,0.0014075994,0.4394139,0.26026922,0.020196073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041218262,0.000026227106,0.000067893685,0.0018466852,0.00012053453,5.1189187e-7,0.00096792367,0.000006386892,0.000016329685,0.000097657874,0.99619937,0.0002382974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.090911016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008765435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73593014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077723217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022792771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977953312","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Aboriginal Law & Indigenous Laws: Indigenous Laws and the Canadian Legal System","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Indigenous; Political science","score_opus":0.04452822510081191,"score_gpt":0.37253687841463345,"score_spread":0.32800865331382156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977953312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004408763,0.010424765,0.0000016498557,0.015137051,0.002246677,0.0036851761,0.00048059822,0.00032276716,0.96329254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4702455,0.01070491,0.0002909761,0.0022697514,0.01103886,0.0008870959,0.00009746545,0.00017931825,0.5042861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99046487,0.0023979372,0.0007974949,0.0009391409,0.0026905765,0.002709982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99499327,0.0016764693,0.00031164216,0.000627291,0.0014797049,0.00091164804],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008069954,0.0006309161,0.0010907083,0.0002772325,0.017787281,0.0020071375,0.0019703421,0.0012006888,0.00026269277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004402522,0.00033817696,0.00025964528,0.0006694342,0.0076548494,0.00047681047,0.0002709113,0.0016166798,0.000545955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004125878,0.000024474131,0.000277138,0.00022754478,0.0003953002,0.00017096166,0.14175767,3.2660208e-7,7.928378e-7,0.70376587,0.15146479,0.0018738582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007219451,0.00005518942,0.00015414771,0.00034761228,0.0000780742,0.000014648613,0.04991222,4.736697e-7,0.0000036124884,0.00067699776,0.947514,0.00052107364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99736905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79604924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056902627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006131174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978324001","doi":"","title":"Is Originalism Bad for Women? the Curious Case of Canada's \"Equal Rights Amendment.\"","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Ratification; Interpretation (philosophy); Charter; Constitution; Political science; Law; Original meaning; Meaning (existential); Politics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027682851914534415,"score_gpt":0.29895921376263684,"score_spread":0.27127636184810244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978324001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91371346,0.0012687522,0.0014577259,0.02220156,0.0017496503,0.0018602926,0.00025515142,0.00011592584,0.057377465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971417,0.00007993825,0.00030680516,0.00038428558,0.00043777807,0.00013115606,0.0000037212646,0.0000057045295,0.001508902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985301,0.00016210531,0.0003139176,0.00025458043,0.0002757996,0.0004634909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998582,0.0006288933,0.00019222802,0.00019460253,0.00026060521,0.00014165264],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006483932,0.0001688833,0.00029196023,0.000025362182,0.0025635988,0.00006146697,0.00028481698,0.00007698462,0.00010834526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043535786,0.00011457064,0.00010259829,0.00017129257,0.0011579848,0.00011156166,0.00004899811,0.00010351249,0.0000055867567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000147687015,0.000041636333,0.00024104303,0.000052531395,0.000104940686,0.000022395283,0.027291602,0.00006502344,0.00003341231,0.9651766,0.0064867386,0.00046932412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047623718,0.000041951196,0.00007767527,0.000056347282,0.000050390194,0.00003149854,0.016849307,0.00009178066,0.00018478282,0.007394412,0.97451407,0.00023153762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50073606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81071067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96802735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059483066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005254378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99873495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980427265","doi":"","title":"Canada and the Rule of Law: 150 Years After Confederation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.016663194888243364,"score_gpt":0.27186265242218255,"score_spread":0.2551994575339392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980427265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9048141,0.00041397693,0.0000012470716,0.009720461,0.00032843256,0.00027866315,0.000020407273,0.000015024097,0.084407635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962176,0.000055510358,0.00006472834,0.0010065613,0.00019122029,0.00002344667,0.0000010041655,0.0000042278916,0.0024357028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917907,0.00010062751,0.00012554976,0.00012253558,0.00029805518,0.00017417537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945,0.0000932421,0.00010962903,0.0001781857,0.000089559304,0.00007934519],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032815142,0.00007075318,0.00014946026,0.00000283517,0.001565049,0.00026866843,0.00020518266,0.000048836027,0.00014214027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027637574,0.00004776479,0.000035325338,0.00001048425,0.001087569,0.00024471828,0.00008416223,0.00009931764,0.000012858571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071419076,0.000016048987,0.018408637,0.00001822608,0.000076775126,0.000009299361,0.012989185,0.0000023932075,0.00011718191,0.9635178,0.003984186,0.00078884524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013402588,0.000014750724,0.27703992,0.00004126104,0.000041729334,5.2694634e-7,0.0028787402,0.000008614115,0.0003645967,0.0038300941,0.7142052,0.00023430426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9596877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008147773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001227247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981578641","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvqc6jwv.7","title":"THE EVOLUTION OF INDIGENOUS SELF-GOVERNANCE IN CANADA","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Arizona Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Corporate governance; Geography; Political science; Business; Ecology; Biology; Finance","score_opus":0.01415824223552784,"score_gpt":0.19488761342538904,"score_spread":0.1807293711898612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981578641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006337149,0.0011348316,0.0000022119625,0.00008523337,0.0002077746,0.0004983839,0.00007985176,0.000014570132,0.99164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36131206,0.0011368007,0.000051468436,0.0000054501475,0.000034031847,1.942778e-7,0.0000019246788,0.000008929713,0.63744915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998866,0.000052127678,0.00015696976,0.0001731694,0.00053498376,0.00021675587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990082,0.00018511845,0.00042202396,0.00016972936,0.00017310628,0.0000418695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014857858,0.00013055145,0.0002810988,0.000017604058,0.00041980867,0.0000068379727,0.0005295974,0.00015563467,0.000020075766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020429376,0.00012000892,0.00008398758,0.0000093594535,0.00041088875,0.000047303947,0.00017021541,0.00022039244,0.0000021313988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007202078,0.0000136632225,0.0014630664,0.00010639305,0.00026934172,0.000019340881,0.048280995,0.000034348916,0.000010414665,0.9436243,0.0014159138,0.004690192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030393925,0.000032267373,0.0051553957,0.0001561405,0.00006838288,1.6678322e-7,0.0065975506,0.000007277986,0.000014558517,0.00091069937,0.98652214,0.00023145652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9941742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9851062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028629715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023391545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7486571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981644837","doi":"","title":"The Metaphysics of Love: An Annotated Bibliography","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Bibliography; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.025063646991468316,"score_gpt":0.3102532083873004,"score_spread":0.2851895613958321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981644837","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5954469,0.00079909863,0.00017454967,0.039323654,0.0019880123,0.0015544094,0.000018984296,0.00050409057,0.3601903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954456,0.0023036161,0.00045772173,0.0005159752,0.0005321641,0.000029923365,0.000034770423,0.00002901486,0.00065119687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968121,0.0006441498,0.0004936617,0.00043605064,0.0009982821,0.0006157576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977135,0.0007773412,0.00036241644,0.00045075387,0.0004738064,0.00022217789],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014366375,0.00028780897,0.000364146,0.00042842748,0.0023398458,0.000320601,0.0007524953,0.00012793692,0.00025923163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060110784,0.00020401753,0.0002622106,0.004590968,0.0020439571,0.0010249094,0.000073436306,0.00023731389,0.00022659684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020792626,0.00058124884,0.025880113,0.000052964653,0.0013521566,0.0000020436646,0.06815347,0.00019393019,0.012862889,0.70754737,0.0070892354,0.17607668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009226141,0.00021932505,0.063276805,0.00002984571,0.00022147257,8.1634545e-7,0.021844015,0.00015275336,0.0006422129,0.013880326,0.8980831,0.00072671374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025262109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025488278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8909939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008554654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073107876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981694973","doi":"10.7202/1059557ar","title":"Le projet de réforme du droit des successions","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.01971500355525772,"score_gpt":0.271865595544379,"score_spread":0.25215059198912126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981694973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80700976,0.003164148,0.00010258873,0.02117896,0.0011658164,0.00080427126,0.000047933063,0.00015808898,0.16636844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9068821,0.0028806047,0.0019504601,0.00042431254,0.0012583323,0.00008366016,0.000014471745,0.000044286036,0.08646178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967966,0.0003648057,0.00045392785,0.00054349744,0.0003938663,0.001447322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985019,0.0002673677,0.00024914453,0.0003320963,0.00021087781,0.00043863116],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010306543,0.0002706813,0.0005535043,0.000058111047,0.0014389263,0.00019035809,0.0006872016,0.00043083748,0.0010265713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048367854,0.0003578537,0.00036250497,0.00069766643,0.0010759524,0.00087698054,0.00023641833,0.0004971771,0.0018635496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004257064,0.0005700447,0.426754,0.0010155038,0.00027309632,0.000102897066,0.07453263,0.00020118974,0.0012546286,0.4665461,0.010076489,0.018630873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018716181,0.00036081029,0.27091154,0.0020518804,0.00034079843,0.00014984664,0.041613985,0.0018727181,0.0007134095,0.20319058,0.47498596,0.0019368618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02764236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007820864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46490946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018426465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005125258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981708187","doi":"10.4337/9781788113205.00035","title":"Conflicts in indigenous law: courts and federalism in the United States and common law nations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Federalist; Political science; Sovereignty; Supreme court; Federalism; Law; Indigenous rights; Politics; Devolution (biology); Sovereign state; Public administration; Geography","score_opus":0.03507061778984882,"score_gpt":0.28436656985617953,"score_spread":0.2492959520663307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981708187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057206456,0.0007989384,3.6623786e-7,0.00820401,0.00031578017,0.0012675746,0.000071858754,0.0000855203,0.9320495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8155298,0.0013617361,0.00007390555,0.0082772225,0.00048273258,0.00007741383,0.00035663872,0.00008372838,0.1737568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777853,0.00027752266,0.00039053755,0.00039766473,0.0006771308,0.00047860882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998244,0.0010236371,0.00023090612,0.0002008123,0.00018973183,0.00011094094],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015293229,0.00032116583,0.00046460808,0.00022191263,0.0014218518,0.0028554203,0.00046814344,0.0005171159,0.0000141255205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019179768,0.0002477995,0.00005482059,0.000057856436,0.0009285421,0.00064183003,0.00022310043,0.0010315588,0.00000662594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058326814,0.000009598737,0.0003579928,0.00003339387,0.000037546342,0.000018280367,0.18397987,0.0000034764034,6.353876e-7,0.81384224,0.0011984085,0.0005127111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043118748,0.000028730643,0.0013816317,0.00021670798,0.000024633748,0.0000029339108,0.0053833737,0.0000063544535,0.0000012178625,0.037019666,0.9551446,0.0003589579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26867074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52469134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9539462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029453434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000109768735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981914853","doi":"10.3390/rel10110597","title":"The Discarded Image and the Debunked Tao: Objective Value in C.S. Lewis’ Medieval Model and His Critique of Modernity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religions","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences; Xiamen University; National Research University Higher School of Economics; University of Toronto","keywords":"Subjectivism; Explication; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Doctrine; Pluralism (philosophy); Modernity; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Theology","score_opus":0.015271246662041747,"score_gpt":0.3021522263668252,"score_spread":0.28688097970478343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981914853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9680704,0.00190161,0.0000792702,0.016765552,0.00007362817,0.0006749119,0.000013826321,0.000022084805,0.01239873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932434,0.0058960244,0.00017336331,0.000077938384,0.000028857512,0.00003869708,6.3509304e-7,0.0000057149755,0.0005353664],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871343,0.00045034633,0.00017425486,0.00017229297,0.00026101872,0.00022865794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867004,0.0009719028,0.0000666941,0.0001268478,0.00011262417,0.00005186667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009170593,0.00009854161,0.0002173207,0.000015360712,0.0008059046,0.00005074638,0.00015899401,0.000071924704,0.0000023015632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007953796,0.00005078472,0.00006365596,0.000112019115,0.0013247434,0.00013255022,0.00013610012,0.00018764248,0.0000027100732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023539891,0.00011774264,0.02512171,0.00006857545,0.00023545744,0.000002754186,0.5226742,0.0014145159,0.0020234373,0.44257018,0.0044404157,0.0010955842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00828828,0.00016036922,0.24515389,0.00033408834,0.00035391274,0.0000058197534,0.21602768,0.101543255,0.00059943186,0.42198333,0.0043999404,0.0011500175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029246029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011079475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30664656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008637178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006396842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97721833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982150316","doi":"","title":"Remedying the Remedy: Bedford's Suspended Declaration of Invalidity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Jurisdiction; Remedial education; Constitution; Redress","score_opus":0.0561625888549037,"score_gpt":0.33088056414203537,"score_spread":0.27471797528713165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982150316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96188956,0.0018344652,0.0013024678,0.014032877,0.0007654831,0.00042327237,0.0000015273562,0.00005480665,0.019695519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99462813,0.002624661,0.00009858711,0.00009410525,0.0012264813,0.0000037478696,0.0000010209563,0.000007777072,0.0013155042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971431,0.0004284755,0.00029149986,0.00013392823,0.0006112901,0.0013917178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989814,0.00011475367,0.0002886279,0.00012258494,0.00042983246,0.000062792955],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004984559,0.000105124076,0.00016204605,0.000031827767,0.0022131032,0.00007633167,0.0004268142,0.00008443354,0.00010786051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009976234,0.00006632915,0.00011089042,0.0002809805,0.00062430033,0.00030919493,0.000054923443,0.0008743986,0.000025755224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010638144,0.00008096613,0.010309456,0.000007041608,0.00038435005,0.000001488145,0.06413236,0.000007058958,0.00271322,0.886547,0.0025291948,0.03318145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012500205,0.0007247557,0.011145834,0.00007224255,0.00018709515,0.000051399984,0.2108101,0.0000681219,0.004528593,0.6544745,0.11614879,0.0005385473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035513774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.076876104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23207253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011144853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012341519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2987467374","doi":"10.14324/111.444.ljcs.2019v34.009","title":"Wisdom of the Elders: Canadian Reconciliatory Experience as an Insight on the Present","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Dignity; Deference; Enthusiasm; Harm; Environmental ethics; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Law; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.06257401903777396,"score_gpt":0.3176170666927969,"score_spread":0.25504304765502295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2987467374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91622806,0.005719216,3.562785e-8,0.03670436,0.0013121486,0.00037018413,0.000009644064,0.000004025116,0.039652348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937644,0.0019600643,0.000010967442,0.0018584394,0.00030327044,0.000008533317,1.2482163e-7,0.000008396496,0.0020857975],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978877,0.0004200242,0.00037397357,0.00015139775,0.00068423786,0.00048269195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978923,0.00036182845,0.00032954724,0.0002458252,0.0006622306,0.0005082697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078232144,0.00015592952,0.00033431465,0.00018731442,0.0012106792,0.000056035882,0.0007509096,0.000076736906,0.00029040955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011415535,0.00008155686,0.00016021832,0.00051250454,0.0009072849,0.00029168383,0.000041082738,0.00032344926,0.000025584397],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005044114,0.000040185074,0.07155026,0.000032404518,0.00071302755,0.000058280006,0.8292012,0.0001053668,0.00013032461,0.028647488,0.064979166,0.0044918205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022275874,0.00015538695,0.018932285,0.00014621449,0.00002962902,0.0000043155546,0.28185284,0.000001182362,0.00034609446,0.00043518908,0.6977278,0.00014629228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9064007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9924542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63274866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009823289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016185264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93116874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989837601","doi":"10.4000/rdr.287","title":"Le principe d’accommodement raisonnable en matière religieuse","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du droit des religions","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019315842153738504,"score_gpt":0.2703594865863785,"score_spread":0.25104364443264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989837601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46889153,0.021870973,0.00014730603,0.063498735,0.002696746,0.0016889975,0.000064361295,0.00030887415,0.44083247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78011954,0.03248764,0.0021348707,0.0003714537,0.0011615342,0.000117851545,0.0000203926,0.00006265916,0.18352407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647355,0.00043712195,0.0006979129,0.000700342,0.00055499544,0.0011360782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979204,0.0004927848,0.00028731074,0.0006271612,0.00032214713,0.00035018317],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007648685,0.00043474775,0.00069733994,0.00007641796,0.0017321244,0.00021138553,0.00081767305,0.00042983514,0.00074816437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055027084,0.00045848254,0.00045439092,0.0008046044,0.00077752664,0.00067741144,0.000455508,0.00053071487,0.0061572827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029368412,0.0006109317,0.019749682,0.0007916367,0.0004367543,0.00004925308,0.06153359,0.00091401767,0.0003133239,0.80426526,0.10675474,0.004551411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064893335,0.00012306149,0.0075034313,0.00074094365,0.00014367109,0.000015011036,0.0073934905,0.0003769972,0.000085725784,0.014670142,0.9676204,0.000678204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0363903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054102894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86086565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014890301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029016525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990684935","doi":"10.4000/rdr.295","title":"Convictions religieuses et ajustements de la norme commune : raideur théorique et souplesse jurisprudentielle","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du droit des religions","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.018147839460463805,"score_gpt":0.3188749625724672,"score_spread":0.30072712311200345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990684935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7081243,0.019994335,0.000552649,0.053895023,0.0025981644,0.0013216836,0.00014156864,0.00033292652,0.2130394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7913122,0.1300832,0.001093994,0.0009697064,0.00039570648,0.00013309075,0.000039874358,0.00006557268,0.07590665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956118,0.0016526944,0.0007249838,0.0005645358,0.00047939422,0.00096662977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996489,0.0018288591,0.00037854642,0.0005944765,0.00036127536,0.00034786973],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016842429,0.00045549456,0.0006710541,0.0000909044,0.002859183,0.000642883,0.0007596065,0.0005264585,0.0003264333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007914661,0.00048277972,0.00048799333,0.0008350363,0.0013059174,0.0007278457,0.0004499508,0.00094316195,0.0015895952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004249617,0.0011167723,0.10339152,0.00077097415,0.0007730777,0.00009333066,0.098416336,0.00173541,0.0010466566,0.5750275,0.21692714,0.00065875734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009473844,0.00014229567,0.018597279,0.0011287169,0.00028238894,0.00007634467,0.016014764,0.00022815351,0.00008544284,0.012875287,0.9489024,0.00071954564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03739561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011873383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73197526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011098171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003831171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990774536","doi":"10.22215/cjcr.v5i1.1226","title":"Is the right to early intervention being honoured? A study of family experiences with early childhood services","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Children s Rights / Revue canadienne des droits des enfants","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Intervention (counseling); Legislation; Political science; Dignity; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Early childhood; Economic growth; Medicine; Convention; Public relations; Public administration; Nursing; Psychology; Human rights; Law; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.011549029101538693,"score_gpt":0.2517914789950956,"score_spread":0.2402424498935569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990774536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962979,0.00040556406,0.000009715892,0.00027368564,0.00045480172,0.0008089518,0.000035650944,0.000014509972,0.0016992192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986832,0.000012498636,0.00018056479,0.00012516083,0.0006365548,0.00002168927,0.0000014989191,0.00002602994,0.00031277107],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971442,0.000332038,0.00072481815,0.0003831654,0.0004051218,0.0010106595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99652946,0.00008937099,0.00059937016,0.000316302,0.0011140583,0.0013514231],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080365955,0.00032875652,0.0005660659,0.0003622457,0.002871804,0.0003399428,0.0012939795,0.00011637972,0.000153829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001160983,0.00020731572,0.00019213965,0.0009844041,0.0015563648,0.0008217022,0.000046239868,0.00031084244,0.000011177172],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032661967,0.000066693836,0.12617876,0.000011530912,0.0003827133,0.00006120076,0.8700792,0.0000036649883,0.000008610449,0.000383267,0.00005975103,0.0027319205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007823194,0.001973678,0.85817987,0.000769647,0.0001703634,0.00006933184,0.13501,0.0000014327669,0.00020861402,0.0011075689,0.0013726598,0.0003545042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7496922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.982285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7350692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000674644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002892568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990967075","doi":"10.71781/2017","title":"Des règles de dévolution légale en droit québécois : perspectives socio-historiques des affections présumées, pour une reconnaissance de la vocation successorale ab intestat du conjoint de fait survivant","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.041591692432917625,"score_gpt":0.360764709478406,"score_spread":0.3191730170454884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990967075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9537342,0.0062324717,0.0014996465,0.002359803,0.0005810643,0.0012242678,0.00009748888,0.00004094969,0.034230087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95022404,0.006035963,0.021994764,0.000020385041,0.0008634233,0.00033758057,0.00015804381,0.000066571534,0.020299204],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99482626,0.0022984191,0.0006098176,0.0008978374,0.0004118379,0.00095584773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964022,0.0011578817,0.00072488055,0.00024818926,0.0011565152,0.00031033304],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002809832,0.00059816265,0.0007234534,0.00011728107,0.0040003294,0.0007008357,0.0008808883,0.0006913659,0.0011707832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032347615,0.0006233128,0.0002959617,0.0006129068,0.0035994095,0.0013960416,0.00015274364,0.0005859146,0.00020208827],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013931814,0.0005378023,0.047108956,0.00020763933,0.00033451463,0.0000135293985,0.8957696,0.000043958782,0.00611006,0.0043054437,0.002623053,0.042806126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054396264,0.0002417329,0.23104732,0.0010411832,0.00036452018,0.000023585299,0.71340436,0.0002952557,0.0069858017,0.00882363,0.036283433,0.00094519794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.567121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7517443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18462326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012088056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016060959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991077786","doi":"10.21991/cf29391","title":"Shouting into the Constitutional Void: Section 28 and Bill 21","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Law; Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Bill of rights; Constitutional law; Blocking (statistics); Sociology; Public administration; Constitution; Business; Philosophy; Computer science; Advertising; Linguistics","score_opus":0.020440381728357857,"score_gpt":0.28113438042424244,"score_spread":0.26069399869588455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991077786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3205597,0.009259636,0.034433093,0.18582544,0.02118982,0.0062067467,0.00039105755,0.0014254478,0.42070907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99433315,0.00034933718,0.00076493016,0.0019624755,0.000685091,0.00011664397,0.00006420388,0.000009809481,0.0017143855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99631816,0.0002575979,0.00064457254,0.000746825,0.0010220524,0.0010107966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779767,0.0006981999,0.0002720701,0.00032065893,0.00060393807,0.00030746133],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011182354,0.00043560227,0.00044101675,0.0001557413,0.00798954,0.00034591023,0.0004605138,0.00034835562,0.00056179444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012861757,0.00029579224,0.00025612154,0.00059054047,0.02607291,0.0011944963,0.00036059855,0.00059827644,0.0005035949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036808382,0.000050055438,0.07188337,0.0000171913,0.00011619126,0.0000058756464,0.001982565,0.0004259877,0.00024919896,0.9195688,0.0041154176,0.0015485703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014115777,0.00005665476,0.004298555,0.00018080322,0.00009819694,0.0001138912,0.038516596,0.0004292729,0.00009569317,0.01975173,0.9342981,0.00074893236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057687773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028451658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9301827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007711519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016595268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W299398132","doi":"10.18584/iipj.2015.6.1.6","title":"No Jordan’s Principle Cases in Canada? A Review of the Administrative Response to Jordan’s Principle","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Indigenous Policy Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Royal Bank of Canada; McGill University; UNICEF","keywords":"Indigenous; Legislature; Denial; Administrative law; Political science; Public administration; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.1281705486883464,"score_gpt":0.46580442545543305,"score_spread":0.33763387676708667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W299398132","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034133687,0.98121625,3.774394e-7,0.00457333,0.0014221206,0.0021313368,0.00060739886,0.000011447221,0.006624391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011434588,0.991064,0.0001014377,0.00090651057,0.0014500391,0.00013507993,0.000011578054,0.000034320474,0.005153552],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99320036,0.0019985004,0.0015814449,0.0003398565,0.0021478334,0.000731987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949895,0.0009998898,0.0016207141,0.00030546286,0.0016164733,0.00046792752],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033122627,0.00044589912,0.0014268971,0.00028476852,0.00075600797,0.00012968964,0.0021190566,0.00016881182,0.00022996278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015189296,0.0002902174,0.0005180484,0.0008693872,0.00022990386,0.00018516122,0.00042506226,0.0009968191,0.000057682635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010510184,0.0013777011,0.0029293087,0.03250539,0.0050095646,0.0032379255,0.19169874,0.00006478797,0.0000037116872,0.017520329,0.08867588,0.65592563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014346563,0.00007307282,0.00037486103,0.0253314,0.0000916846,0.0003022691,0.0012591729,1.4490624e-7,7.7374574e-7,0.00006085413,0.97206473,0.00029757328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.868564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93445486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8833888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01916911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0577601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994068231","doi":"","title":"Comment in Response to the Draft Model Conscientious Objection Policy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.06597081633385625,"score_gpt":0.42193387586080455,"score_spread":0.3559630595269483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994068231","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036406708,0.027524704,0.00003102543,0.95945597,0.00015415248,0.003128818,0.000004746333,0.000049938753,0.0060099624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48367813,0.08017691,0.0006893221,0.43227383,0.00019262261,0.0009879131,0.000002620819,0.000012195053,0.001986472],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973739,0.0012971068,0.00035616462,0.00018537424,0.00034284563,0.00044463834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919355,0.0002018832,0.00010948579,0.00017994689,0.00011586876,0.00019927953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035305652,0.00009459965,0.00026448953,0.000025832529,0.0012411672,0.00006212523,0.00020993568,0.00003348392,0.00008375141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078574393,0.00005861961,0.00006199622,0.0005834603,0.00018475155,0.00012581833,0.00007298118,0.00013881853,0.00042831048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029733552,0.00016284952,0.00025006902,0.0012925166,0.0000170629,9.929146e-7,0.07708484,0.00011459199,0.000013506116,0.4160825,0.45743343,0.04751789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088359935,0.000027167318,0.000999388,0.0006551582,0.0000030092704,3.3272337e-7,0.00079925917,0.00006055679,3.2451646e-7,0.00039570176,0.9968958,0.00007496321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18314034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053592086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5394623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089972094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003301316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9636774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W299413661","doi":"","title":"Due Process, Collective Bargaining, and S. 2(D) of the Charter: A Comment on B.C. Health Services","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Collective bargaining; Supreme court; Entitlement (fair division); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Freedom of association; Context (archaeology); Labour law; Sociology; Economics; Human rights","score_opus":0.009008304120913378,"score_gpt":0.28356077667657653,"score_spread":0.2745524725556632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W299413661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8820228,0.008121124,0.000026820222,0.09093425,0.00022371185,0.000893586,0.000010602372,0.000040903622,0.017726228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959646,0.0017484286,0.000008669908,0.0010581067,0.00020459559,0.000009449449,5.3896474e-7,0.000006737844,0.0009988565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978888,0.00025108966,0.00021785102,0.00013033266,0.00041240078,0.0010995156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994079,0.000066461565,0.00029440824,0.000060102426,0.00011828826,0.00005284804],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012041322,0.00010930911,0.00019789195,0.00002558031,0.0017245114,0.00004838657,0.00022284227,0.000044617977,0.000008367612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026754466,0.000067520836,0.00006380303,0.00021831962,0.00020070134,0.0001032328,0.000031862288,0.0006193948,0.0000016249128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016725688,0.0005250048,0.06256267,0.000093498005,0.0004950946,0.0000019325953,0.21624097,0.000079359364,0.00007320682,0.70132154,0.0053916336,0.01304782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025746191,0.0014273403,0.09092212,0.0004618558,0.00007547235,0.0000460381,0.3336411,0.00005919869,0.0002247599,0.52197766,0.048089787,0.00050001504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013166547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058725167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17934388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013456782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014246341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995287528","doi":"10.1177/1473779519891623","title":"Constitutional promises of indigenous recognition: Canada, Vanuatu and the challenges of pluralism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Indigenous; Commit; Colonialism; Indigenous rights; Political science; Law; Legal pluralism; Sociology; Law and economics; Human rights; Political economy; Epistemology; Comparative law; Legal realism","score_opus":0.04928625957437298,"score_gpt":0.3044637041453054,"score_spread":0.2551774445709324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995287528","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026649885,0.78000873,1.324494e-7,0.030406814,0.0002653302,0.0017889956,0.000041376297,0.00001522971,0.16082348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8382446,0.1606632,0.000040144754,0.0006169713,0.00004144328,0.00003311495,0.0000035013757,0.0000020052862,0.00035497226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988708,0.000308028,0.00028144434,0.00010829523,0.00029820728,0.0001332145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990269,0.00043393907,0.0002157173,0.00011715036,0.00016525082,0.000041025636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059100025,0.000085468884,0.0004342073,0.000005979022,0.00029826252,0.000008584989,0.00017214059,0.000023367948,0.00016693049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000981488,0.000050196868,0.00006577285,0.00012324221,0.0018609875,0.00007758402,0.000057989873,0.000092517774,0.000005218097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010643707,0.000020715699,0.0007337639,0.0013694235,0.00006983911,0.0000010593908,0.0031894832,2.1147854e-7,0.0000022515976,0.9770897,0.0011811635,0.016331766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006335929,0.000018249502,0.0030158905,0.0044957725,0.00013043605,0.0000026803846,0.0013856505,2.7360423e-7,0.000043185606,0.0033493657,0.9867442,0.00018068215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3285049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84082574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98556304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058725567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000155747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6856886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995523289","doi":"","title":"ACPNS Legal Case Notes Series: 2016-31 Royal Trust Corporation Of Canada v The University Of Western Ontario","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; University of Windsor","keywords":"Corporation; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; High Court; Public administration","score_opus":0.012593391581687697,"score_gpt":0.20361023829681918,"score_spread":0.19101684671513147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995523289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855463,0.000018118184,0.000101326674,0.00873013,0.00007654577,0.0001919105,0.00005244462,0.000035510133,0.0052477424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838052,0.000062261,0.00030429554,0.000004790034,0.000009531472,6.871433e-8,0.0000010694586,0.0000025869151,0.015810221],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992209,0.00005772504,0.00012421544,0.0001866639,0.00020934647,0.00020114725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908423,0.00009618256,0.00028337265,0.00021793513,0.0002686451,0.000049637667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017767848,0.000101297504,0.0002458518,0.000054250388,0.00062101736,0.0000039234205,0.00042481747,0.0001731772,0.00022672006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011210414,0.00007577606,0.00006504716,0.00017544097,0.0015170446,0.00017014002,0.00022044941,0.00013165809,0.000005121484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026076598,0.000096838936,0.9535295,0.000035000652,0.0002907822,0.000435689,0.021522993,0.000019519357,0.0007393271,0.012502014,0.0056749545,0.004892661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018010885,0.0001820752,0.4348822,0.00016156028,0.00018914627,0.00002392949,0.10705937,0.000006697887,0.0025552725,0.0006013457,0.4521317,0.00040563746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.974483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99670804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51864725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000512199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007196613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5589614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996104773","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3401591","title":"The Canada Summer Jobs Debate and the Democratic Decline","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Political economy; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.008984840848250908,"score_gpt":0.2605664697138919,"score_spread":0.251581628865641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996104773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8638323,0.01974061,0.000028849976,0.10869986,0.0006490035,0.00040223132,8.791593e-7,0.000015510983,0.0066307676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697882,0.016375685,0.000006677647,0.00062539027,0.0002997839,0.0000055714463,2.2687433e-7,0.0000068940953,0.01289157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972536,0.0003788505,0.00019919628,0.00011101388,0.0004892868,0.001568056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989344,0.00065598363,0.00013077351,0.00009312173,0.00011067881,0.00007504388],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032439702,0.000106149186,0.00015413076,0.000007262883,0.0029463405,0.00016917485,0.0003764453,0.000038126156,0.000023677007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043982707,0.000046863726,0.00006209972,0.00011767545,0.0003857388,0.00011321723,0.0000720933,0.0009711009,0.000012808934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016941378,0.00001739949,0.05819725,0.0000057870407,0.0006603817,0.0000042027505,0.009696103,0.000027529017,0.000033843113,0.88938814,0.007312208,0.034487758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003592458,0.00012825849,0.027207373,0.000031728236,0.00016712512,0.000096747164,0.13448301,0.00023342649,0.000016436856,0.39687866,0.43666646,0.00049831363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58695865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49250948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010722956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026284556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996669099","doi":"","title":"Effects of Mandatory Minimum Sentences on the Rights of the Indigenous Population in Canada: A Proposed Solution to Bill C-10's Conflict With Section 718.2(e) of the Canadian Criminal Code","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Section (typography); Law; Population; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Demography","score_opus":0.022457540751058765,"score_gpt":0.24590952895194107,"score_spread":0.2234519882008823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996669099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99150264,0.0000073270867,7.77549e-7,0.0003189407,0.00060387957,0.0028870476,0.00036544664,0.000012894035,0.0043010605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950593,0.000008220594,0.0000043835234,0.000091140064,0.000040413237,0.000010056619,0.0000794168,0.00001832695,0.004688733],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969243,0.00046146242,0.00038531172,0.00045384403,0.0012899741,0.00048514394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776477,0.0002912501,0.00068391196,0.00034565845,0.0007134344,0.00020096451],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033508366,0.00033734998,0.00049491785,0.00034068423,0.0013044804,0.00019613655,0.0015001846,0.00025960812,0.000049041217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046659686,0.00018780277,0.00018008603,0.0013848725,0.00023520038,0.0008920154,0.00019216097,0.00045973193,0.000017823199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002735397,0.000343214,0.9103301,0.001177479,0.0006937416,0.000043598546,0.077540286,0.00081359624,0.0014907222,0.0025131938,0.0012298638,0.0010887941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042874398,0.00014517413,0.9621301,0.00090969284,0.00017212656,5.503958e-7,0.0067187254,0.000003835258,0.0052048415,0.000024648183,0.023924,0.00033755146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9756225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07082156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045351377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024455497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998635348","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x19001868","title":"General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Synod; Session (web analytics); Theology; Political science; Law; Advertising; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.014206956771013272,"score_gpt":0.2652995725323078,"score_spread":0.25109261576129455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998635348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90062916,0.000104749335,0.000013061936,0.003933969,0.00059556967,0.00012659257,0.000009808725,0.0000051767274,0.09458192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998413,0.000010804309,0.00024843588,0.00015937033,0.00029821703,8.23621e-7,1.437037e-7,0.0000052516903,0.00086390274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982944,0.00020552505,0.00028929024,0.00009226095,0.00079647836,0.0003220456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913836,0.00022315994,0.00016656065,0.00010325719,0.00021786708,0.0001507878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042449517,0.00008128612,0.00022474433,0.000008298901,0.00061103166,0.000023502773,0.0003736119,0.000055630946,0.0006356412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037880635,0.00004826866,0.0001128231,0.00014713923,0.0005288103,0.00007130054,0.00007872854,0.00026248218,0.000003667837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052160653,0.00012284023,0.048094314,0.000041299838,0.00018895375,0.00001819989,0.008070407,0.00033297468,0.0035451322,0.92837036,0.009887504,0.0012758411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015393754,0.00023264867,0.81733906,0.00027659524,0.00015609564,0.000060044902,0.020318815,0.00029245138,0.0038932038,0.0056479294,0.14962046,0.0006233075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4403092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5145524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92272246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021497016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038526967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6959826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30005539","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1301","title":"\"The Last Line of Defence for [Which?] Citizens\": Accountability, Equality, and the Right to Health in Chaoulli","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Right to health; Accountability; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Political science; Health care; Remedial education; Poverty; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.03683498682653357,"score_gpt":0.3514663636709567,"score_spread":0.3146313768444231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30005539","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2578519,0.010237751,0.0017199505,0.5075216,0.0015192354,0.0044493317,0.00014946348,0.00008336817,0.21646738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99742705,0.00055350596,0.0006725508,0.00060818065,0.00046341922,0.000029161733,0.0000012036643,0.0000075741486,0.00023736943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773234,0.00055985816,0.0005706463,0.00017940004,0.0004588418,0.00049890485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979017,0.0011837576,0.0002965967,0.00012709129,0.00036697384,0.00012390377],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005465539,0.00012877039,0.00033464291,0.000019527071,0.0029046144,0.00021961937,0.0003883027,0.00006718893,0.00001616541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005636831,0.000067328045,0.00009981112,0.00023896029,0.0009017258,0.00014768461,0.00011857682,0.00027323037,0.0000027313072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011107303,0.000060980303,0.0027266536,0.000023100149,0.000021787622,4.9674003e-7,0.009069232,0.00007484223,0.00002971352,0.98498666,0.0012149835,0.0016804469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005937466,0.0003816363,0.04412894,0.0003433002,0.00006241748,0.000027737977,0.02366944,0.00018197094,0.00025582814,0.74366707,0.18074079,0.00060340395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23750955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9355974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73957515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022985623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009994419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001868410","doi":"10.5325/weslmethstud.12.1.0047","title":"Whose Body, Whose Life, Whose Decision? A Wesleyan Reflection on Personal Autonomy, Interdependence, and Human Flourishing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wesley and Methodist Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Voluntariness; Flourishing; Autonomy; Image of God; Social psychology; Creatures; Independence (probability theory); Personal identity; Psychology; Interdependence; Rationality; Welfare; Ambivalence; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Law; Self; Political science; Social science; Natural (archaeology); Philosophy","score_opus":0.1361839188947937,"score_gpt":0.4332444359885134,"score_spread":0.2970605170937197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001868410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91844493,0.0136493035,0.0005855534,0.0383162,0.001096673,0.0009894888,0.000037786485,0.00041226315,0.026467772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98939776,0.0030184349,0.0038310837,0.0017036619,0.00088325026,0.00006967379,0.000003383892,0.000020907888,0.0010718415],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970888,0.0006391375,0.0004300547,0.00075340224,0.00056785427,0.0005207616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793243,0.0010890198,0.00019625125,0.00012143477,0.00022401458,0.00043686855],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014816659,0.0003696342,0.0006675395,0.00007565642,0.0041043484,0.00031671618,0.00021776636,0.00016437468,0.00005400948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003884423,0.00029305162,0.00013635548,0.00032186913,0.0009645822,0.00048729678,0.00047775172,0.00048085488,0.000020156236],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005386604,0.0002253576,0.031514015,0.00026074558,0.0011112922,0.000059388374,0.84906816,0.000007949336,0.0014580619,0.029492462,0.02085962,0.06540426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027923943,0.0012751211,0.10990032,0.00061463716,0.0005174173,0.000007783156,0.36803395,0.0001938172,0.00039922827,0.005267378,0.5093106,0.0016873861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018768628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028256152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48845094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002462403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000080146056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002103364","doi":"","title":"Inclusive Religious Neutrality: Rearticulating the Relationship Between Sections 2(a) and 15 of the Charter","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Charter; Law; Vision; Political science; Constitutional law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02244835138174887,"score_gpt":0.3104388795895534,"score_spread":0.2879905282078045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002103364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.976158,0.0008558744,0.000017245135,0.020759776,0.00014660193,0.00025949927,0.0000013436935,0.0000134918155,0.0017881212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99791276,0.0003583503,0.000008359659,0.000072445466,0.0003312257,0.0000035375708,2.992844e-7,0.000006035505,0.0013069735],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817663,0.00040689166,0.00021774287,0.00010737249,0.00033117758,0.00076018163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894434,0.00058148627,0.00020911236,0.00011279444,0.00011232527,0.00003992425],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001843628,0.00007940164,0.00012763444,0.0000183863,0.0019607204,0.00005724607,0.00020539646,0.00007050348,0.0000073269853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005413662,0.000042408265,0.00009712882,0.00024585475,0.00025827836,0.00015626213,0.00008652366,0.0011661033,0.0000075092203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002928537,0.000005501693,0.8583026,0.0000031995967,0.00007548197,6.430548e-8,0.027963586,0.00001843814,0.000070586255,0.11302752,0.00007925148,0.00045085288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023910766,0.000053991684,0.8340052,0.000029423278,0.00007059045,0.000012976344,0.05268288,0.000006323866,0.000018249584,0.11045968,0.0023259255,0.00009569569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025237682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008222426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024719294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046797478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004721958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003160002","doi":"","title":"Section 16 of the Constitution Act, 1867: The Queen, the Capital, and Canadian Constitutionalism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ePrints Soton (University of Southampton)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Section (typography); Constitution; Queen (butterfly); Capital (architecture); Political science; Law; History; Business; Ancient history; Democracy; Advertising; Biology; Politics","score_opus":0.01803091587759484,"score_gpt":0.2316604508470484,"score_spread":0.21362953496945356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003160002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93551236,0.000036328398,0.00007668007,0.012356643,0.0004659863,0.0004043697,0.000033963253,0.00001655369,0.05109709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984637,0.000055314245,0.000028210854,0.00010641675,0.00010707501,5.89673e-7,0.0000015953477,0.0000015821764,0.0012355465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991319,0.00017954984,0.00008697703,0.00014507514,0.0002733254,0.00018318101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992621,0.00010213801,0.00014040552,0.00016628533,0.0002539254,0.00007516546],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045717697,0.000078376455,0.00010846294,0.00002699656,0.0032568872,0.00002268467,0.00035177718,0.0000869883,0.0005085792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017092038,0.0000484807,0.00007954503,0.00019979704,0.0076429034,0.00015817159,0.00013606712,0.00014865372,0.0000276246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034284752,0.000040043073,0.1789305,0.000020411599,0.00022022724,0.0000015521285,0.30034262,0.000015418656,0.00027971336,0.5125144,0.0061634826,0.0014373374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003981306,0.000020936435,0.47450665,0.000053226024,0.000076807744,0.0000030878723,0.21617591,0.00001428614,0.0002172321,0.0018117253,0.30656156,0.00016042958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7218948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67511296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51070267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025627913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035761183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99804074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003543051","doi":"10.1163/22124810-00703003","title":"Honest Scales","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law Religion and State","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Perspective (graphical); Proportionality (law); Value (mathematics); Law; Test (biology); Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01912068999241757,"score_gpt":0.308309223051352,"score_spread":0.28918853305893444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003543051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96382344,0.001234529,0.000006710503,0.0043238294,0.00036422757,0.0000671535,0.0000010535879,0.000009202468,0.030169828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99140525,0.005821383,0.00016894111,0.00034743943,0.00011097246,2.7289096e-7,1.15370845e-7,0.000003070936,0.0021425271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992846,0.000069506736,0.0001878628,0.000056776655,0.0002680081,0.00013324148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994915,0.00007483298,0.00015639263,0.000031700638,0.00014855622,0.00009701296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037018186,0.00005424061,0.00015296832,0.000016715003,0.0002313612,0.0000663193,0.00007612676,0.00003242208,0.000019302173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004468586,0.000035656234,0.000060583898,0.000050680293,0.00016267208,0.00019426513,0.000019862293,0.00010631478,0.000034749053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043613405,0.00023270326,0.10171618,0.0001317777,0.00036234187,0.00016488956,0.16496216,0.00008955091,0.004469666,0.6450481,0.056320272,0.026066264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057078665,0.00013379997,0.014285372,0.00006374391,0.000014483367,0.000012972678,0.0022280857,0.000005577508,0.00010122795,0.0064243376,0.9760318,0.00012782484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017927913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011265067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91971153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040732844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018428529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2710176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007304736","doi":"10.3138/uram.36.3-4.144","title":"3.9 The Self—A Thinking Thing or a Thinking Being? Insight from Shankarite and Cartesian Philosophies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ultimate Reality and Meaning","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cartesian coordinate system; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.054294177265153405,"score_gpt":0.30473359319724075,"score_spread":0.25043941593208735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007304736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.662079,0.0068925405,0.00036961364,0.20156433,0.0006943707,0.0015512076,0.000051151615,0.001822326,0.12497549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909241,0.0036792795,0.0030541758,0.0016256737,0.0006439717,0.000011338386,0.000006615002,0.000016508233,0.000038309026],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979871,0.0003249654,0.00030299582,0.0004096116,0.00052516325,0.00045017287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846804,0.00095392397,0.0001625583,0.00011498389,0.00008753722,0.00021297601],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010256061,0.0002212514,0.0003237919,0.000017446859,0.006497089,0.0008687601,0.00028195963,0.00013422304,0.000011865366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009807543,0.00013881801,0.00005889741,0.00020076695,0.0003943059,0.0005497891,0.0003099101,0.00036095042,0.000003722666],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041956635,0.000010518676,0.0038714476,0.000059134207,0.00013814431,0.00002012136,0.86911017,0.000005821134,0.00019527573,0.120015144,0.00010244466,0.00642982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002631422,0.000241187,0.026616871,0.0013071895,0.0007116241,0.000013635745,0.39760947,0.009330715,0.0006472875,0.30019817,0.2585424,0.0021500348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012577793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005641745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4715007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000821571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045547316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99479634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008518805","doi":"","title":"Quebec's Filiation Regime, The Roy Report 's Recommendations, and the 'Interest of the Child'","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Law; Common law; Family law; Conversation; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Sociology; Public law","score_opus":0.022015074757276834,"score_gpt":0.3137572009055432,"score_spread":0.2917421261482664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008518805","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33680373,0.004113258,0.000088971756,0.6438522,0.0008379313,0.00055313087,0.0000024990397,0.000016014561,0.013732257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98121345,0.00788195,0.000008719715,0.00012964585,0.00040325275,0.000007904235,6.4347176e-7,0.0000046378127,0.010349801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983431,0.00042985482,0.00025140645,0.00010641627,0.00027884453,0.0005903938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998442,0.00018375053,0.0009118202,0.0002950087,0.00014117183,0.000026244454],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043009645,0.00008209371,0.00012704924,0.000009356768,0.006794199,0.0002538155,0.0006765503,0.000047207715,0.000020742234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023741818,0.00003327568,0.00012022987,0.00005637245,0.00096832355,0.00025376838,0.00012729953,0.0009110378,0.000002418883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004850929,0.000028193235,0.011979777,0.0000028879288,0.00028542124,9.418565e-7,0.017216077,0.0000027218175,0.000018167211,0.9269719,0.0052570947,0.038188275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021364212,0.000071054215,0.37290004,0.00018331132,0.00026351347,0.0002933371,0.11751475,0.0000342879,0.000107251355,0.20367996,0.30249816,0.0003179086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039846092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3933581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.723292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041860493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004856555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99449885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010405872","doi":"10.22584/nr50.2020.007","title":"Drawing upon the Wealth of Indigenous Laws in the Yukon","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Northern Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Normative; Law; Sociology; Reflection (computer programming); Political science; Ecology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06644432235987696,"score_gpt":0.3449583223387585,"score_spread":0.27851399997888154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010405872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51320136,0.25965035,0.0000034766133,0.21474384,0.00010788012,0.002522954,0.000005621858,0.000041481446,0.009723054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9105209,0.08183696,0.000008310848,0.0073026647,0.00020686896,0.000047256548,9.5074523e-7,0.0000070770566,0.0000690002],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977373,0.0011419688,0.00029434628,0.00012466917,0.00044443583,0.00025730237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911004,0.0003929008,0.00019904906,0.0002045343,0.000058437083,0.000035052446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002258368,0.00010442463,0.00027687364,0.0000041040244,0.00083480426,0.000029920746,0.0008689277,0.00003126699,0.000052004496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051104283,0.000038847822,0.00012535621,0.00047293925,0.00023927011,0.00005510656,0.00007789369,0.00024849357,0.000085442465],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008940009,0.00004948945,0.020261658,0.0008242304,0.000060468792,0.0000040676046,0.86641425,0.000018253866,0.000015284664,0.0029302407,0.0011116571,0.10830145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002058816,0.00008304546,0.039243095,0.0013256855,0.00016816755,0.0000015035909,0.0575201,0.000008588309,0.000008845032,0.0005405808,0.90064454,0.00024994512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016129833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05015714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8995329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006292005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000720182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99042183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010980273","doi":"","title":"Legal Pluralism and Caron v Alberta: A Canadian Case Study in Constitutional Interpretation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional interpretation; Pluralism (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law; Legal pluralism; Constitutional law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Comparative law; Legal realism; Linguistics","score_opus":0.022329250960339067,"score_gpt":0.29011812915191926,"score_spread":0.2677888781915802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010980273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9622471,0.00039273678,0.00001695718,0.0018739174,0.0005696077,0.0012444613,0.000025061772,0.000033119813,0.033597067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99883497,0.000037034584,0.00008959409,0.00013006643,0.00010365086,0.00008955681,0.000010526932,0.000004858412,0.00069972116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847674,0.00026253532,0.0002991688,0.0003666303,0.00022710724,0.00036780725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992409,0.00024181235,0.0000822176,0.00011793709,0.00012318828,0.00019397981],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004321017,0.00017150208,0.0002695577,0.00015999225,0.0013914842,0.00013832178,0.00014111697,0.000088100045,0.00008898629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026747963,0.00017060248,0.000053892487,0.0002791566,0.0012560427,0.0004109627,0.00007923077,0.00022741825,0.000046103956],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019230021,0.00010136982,0.20101409,0.000020026775,0.00006595158,0.000767984,0.069983535,0.0010740227,0.000018415674,0.72634,0.00009531811,0.0005000515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003448111,0.00023680157,0.027521068,0.0003556854,0.0001524376,0.0018288939,0.81685555,0.0018031851,0.0000062490067,0.00044580447,0.14607781,0.0012684204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86075026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96629953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.746872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009221509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089703634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011560603","doi":"10.11575/prism/34318","title":"The Evolution of Wildlife Law in Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada; University of Alberta; University of Calgary","keywords":"Wildlife; Law; Geography; Political science; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.029210523495498044,"score_gpt":0.3059546952686766,"score_spread":0.27674417177317856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011560603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7006352,0.00014615827,6.2196335e-8,0.003383451,0.000052687345,0.00017326936,0.0000036794363,2.6662045e-7,0.2956052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939522,0.00004719901,0.000071744515,0.000051700103,0.000028457824,0.00000568133,3.7994346e-7,0.0000012279132,0.005841393],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993801,0.000090664966,0.00011140609,0.00007582566,0.00019294657,0.00014906927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997591,0.00009338566,0.000031847874,0.00005917104,0.000027355361,0.000029180403],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029640365,0.000034774257,0.000073779454,0.0000023850162,0.00045649952,0.000039998777,0.00029376254,0.000018453864,0.0011212922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005541602,0.000022537288,0.000012126708,0.000113066846,0.00017430907,0.0001147995,0.00003529353,0.00004483614,0.000036340112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011441336,0.0001022915,0.11129576,0.000005885458,0.000084757885,0.000013339119,0.116178684,0.0004001152,0.00010545658,0.029749414,0.02577663,0.71617323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012240396,0.0000050688254,0.035220157,0.000010523802,0.0000029732662,5.867575e-8,0.028144652,0.000012431366,0.000031567568,0.00013227375,0.93626386,0.000054039883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9988191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91048723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008071414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004973581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011637430","doi":"10.22215/etd/2020-13983","title":"An Exploration of the Colonial Impacts of the Indian Act on Indigenous Women in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Colonialism; Legislation; Paternalism; Political science; Identity (music); Indigenous rights; Gender studies; Geography; Human rights; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02606060509321293,"score_gpt":0.30777147618775474,"score_spread":0.2817108710945418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011637430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934734,0.000017275259,1.6323517e-8,0.0011481615,0.00049606187,0.0007259591,0.000024981318,0.0000060310153,0.004108094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99922323,0.000038688308,0.000002316559,0.000120927514,0.00006799022,0.0000366506,0.000022509348,0.0000073868755,0.00048030948],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983615,0.00029632772,0.00026043408,0.00014168695,0.0006675295,0.00027248997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924254,0.000083554514,0.00036332427,0.0001303853,0.00010248727,0.00007767513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023101814,0.00012629824,0.00025410342,0.000020979012,0.0003966261,0.00002134596,0.00047941922,0.000130002,0.00005093721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038714308,0.00006725447,0.00005633303,0.0004124856,0.000079657686,0.0001795344,0.000020871159,0.00023408397,9.791008e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051413288,0.000034808192,0.023900645,0.00004135891,0.000032558033,8.0437445e-7,0.9743554,0.000029849896,0.00028040702,0.00032119316,0.0001399758,0.0008115861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013715509,0.00007218224,0.5888716,0.00006348255,0.000010246271,1.520976e-8,0.40778857,0.0000012394618,0.0021819049,0.00013945157,0.00062043656,0.00011370786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99051976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99972254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5665668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020101757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003809779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6758385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012063507","doi":"","title":"Hugh M. Kindred: A Tribute","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03116147522242311,"score_gpt":0.30555701705494875,"score_spread":0.2743955418325256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012063507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59173363,0.006341689,0.000053709646,0.022015441,0.0033231063,0.0010503682,0.000053399388,0.00073944795,0.3746892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807335,0.00015607833,0.0007291391,0.001112107,0.0021222485,0.000056885197,0.000007934595,0.000016814782,0.015065287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977116,0.00025653673,0.00024296991,0.00024191554,0.0006011611,0.0009458259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988849,0.00015238074,0.000100826146,0.00021325727,0.00012728618,0.00052134646],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008236222,0.00018697651,0.00026627097,0.000020025014,0.0015269204,0.0001507214,0.00035748907,0.00017482773,0.0013975857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005874634,0.0001571371,0.0001546842,0.00029005867,0.00042908374,0.0008444825,0.00012838999,0.00029538528,0.00242851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047964695,0.0004046992,0.09417792,0.000040211624,0.00025891667,0.0000150809,0.048038397,0.0000063006223,0.00092307566,0.68275344,0.1677726,0.0055613653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032196968,0.00001725305,0.02036993,0.000016287862,0.00002806095,9.0251564e-7,0.0035484957,8.2242235e-7,0.00027910856,0.00070376083,0.9744495,0.00026386412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0228374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009722945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8066769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031975185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053168395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012515956","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0115","title":"In Search of Honourable Crowns and Legitimate Constitutions: <i>Mikisew Cree First Nation v Canada</i> and the Colonial Constitution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Indigenous; Duty; Doctrine; Political science; Legislation; Colonialism; Sociology","score_opus":0.0248928437648911,"score_gpt":0.23658758774391284,"score_spread":0.21169474397902174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012515956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76428944,0.0047944314,0.00024881167,0.08923141,0.00036326115,0.0008168117,0.000095662974,0.000017002487,0.14014314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99797916,0.0016709225,0.00016214995,0.000096357675,0.00003980336,8.9106805e-8,4.3563324e-7,6.789301e-7,0.000050422303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937934,0.0001245935,0.000099650184,0.000067233996,0.00021809783,0.00011111158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995191,0.00012708323,0.000090825415,0.000022577933,0.00015949269,0.00008089001],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000311138,0.00004528228,0.00014022157,0.00000550637,0.0013805706,0.000025871379,0.00010138465,0.00003434754,0.00008886976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010796496,0.000037702754,0.0000237005,0.000036362082,0.002089551,0.0004397947,0.00005073063,0.00009548155,2.0901e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047756574,0.00003562393,0.010143534,0.0000583487,0.000105569125,0.0000388599,0.114265025,0.00031945715,0.00010045179,0.86982965,0.004297252,0.0003286695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013417891,0.00022769999,0.037699204,0.00031797957,0.00023509531,0.000043309785,0.27753773,0.0010894556,0.00018660979,0.0009255873,0.66784644,0.00047302514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99014544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99726224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86890405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037526662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003180858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013366349","doi":"","title":"ACPNS Legal Case Notes Series: 2019-97 Church of Atheism of Central Canada v Canada (National Revenue)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Atheism; Series (stratigraphy); Revenue; Political science; Law; History; Economics; Philosophy; Theology; Accounting; Geology","score_opus":0.009565104221219058,"score_gpt":0.21826524112167212,"score_spread":0.20870013690045305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013366349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98849654,0.000052476047,0.0000054934712,0.006298662,0.0001641521,0.00020635827,0.00031731467,0.000018138231,0.004440874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941712,0.00006552732,0.0003850429,0.000013719326,0.000016507447,2.0152851e-7,0.0000049705054,0.0000036603108,0.005339153],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989103,0.0000449805,0.00016981777,0.00019297126,0.0004101476,0.00027177582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908435,0.00009321443,0.00023569741,0.00016112492,0.00036379675,0.000061792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014808495,0.00010392319,0.0002957841,0.00006450428,0.00024067824,0.000002861764,0.00036546416,0.00015561839,0.00023848035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022667919,0.00010767817,0.000056314482,0.00026961017,0.00051357487,0.00010992563,0.00016498413,0.00017339064,0.00000312958],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019478142,0.00019281637,0.8840384,0.00025511812,0.0006940305,0.00070440484,0.012892826,0.00021816147,0.00273048,0.0665989,0.025849707,0.005630413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015278817,0.0001143592,0.34874532,0.0001527047,0.00009902339,0.000042227097,0.053146213,0.000029739025,0.0055309916,0.0007705244,0.5892841,0.00055691216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99770176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99806666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5634344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056178105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014627153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43909883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014756294","doi":"","title":"Decriminalisation of abortion in New Zealand and Australia.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Michael Smith Health Research BC","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Abortion; Obstetrics; Pregnancy; Genetics","score_opus":0.0951899628751632,"score_gpt":0.31523441171017447,"score_spread":0.22004444883501129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014756294","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3271893,0.0002479267,8.6132104e-7,0.6690002,0.0005461849,0.001380999,0.000011705553,0.00002471667,0.0015981256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7388799,0.00091049477,0.00011708483,0.060874887,0.005441547,0.00050333753,0.00012856562,0.000032010114,0.19311215],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987852,0.00013421568,0.00021704326,0.00019542649,0.00034565304,0.00032246354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995189,0.00013361235,0.00017742868,0.00007422205,0.000054855,0.00004099544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035332429,0.00011445093,0.00024896392,0.000059524733,0.00006136075,0.00004034954,0.00010939637,0.00038123882,0.00002775388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029271952,0.0000981838,0.000042408064,0.00012401192,0.00014838648,0.00013769974,0.000026111245,0.0003230214,0.0000069172265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005990735,0.0000054054094,0.058651764,0.000062186904,0.00002099008,0.0000038468675,0.012517055,6.5307387e-7,0.0000015554741,0.000059750353,0.9207971,0.007873673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001361866,0.0000031410952,0.48560745,0.000015123012,0.000022055085,1.303637e-7,0.0003446778,1.03313184e-7,0.0000068427794,0.0001315619,0.51364696,0.00008576854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078433104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010012868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6081253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020804087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004719371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9277037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022117145","doi":"","title":"Finding Harmony: Law Society of British Columbia v Trinity Western University","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harmony (color); Law; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.026865599762932447,"score_gpt":0.26544551689438683,"score_spread":0.23857991713145438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022117145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95091945,0.00016715216,0.00000399712,0.00069047994,0.00033750266,0.00039836383,0.000101757636,0.000120486664,0.047260836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.952291,0.0002294572,0.00037907838,0.0004636938,0.0001567321,0.0000023096452,0.0000069696025,0.000010853386,0.046459917],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983146,0.0002132768,0.00021004272,0.00033335655,0.00049201853,0.00043665667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991012,0.00016701047,0.00016310571,0.00018568932,0.00018340531,0.00019954586],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005199034,0.00010915643,0.000339082,0.00000501733,0.0010762498,0.00023239362,0.00041614327,0.00018277564,0.0009624501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053534484,0.00016389845,0.0002589789,0.00024854354,0.0006617509,0.0005760239,0.0002061574,0.00029610065,0.00023732365],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033045817,0.00024010446,0.888152,0.00018273905,0.00032502762,0.000022300836,0.013353313,0.000012327732,0.0008892864,0.020364191,0.075303644,0.0011219978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012159884,0.000055434,0.20580313,0.00012573367,0.00005080784,0.0000011434274,0.015266498,0.0000053384856,0.000079932426,0.00037627644,0.7766212,0.00039846724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6476669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.687698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7013176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003528205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007851806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024489432","doi":"","title":"For Richer for Poorer, in Sickness and in Health: Should Australia Embrace Same-Sex Marriage?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Compromise; Legislature; Political science; Law; Opposition (politics); Charter; State (computer science); Politics","score_opus":0.05410616725400386,"score_gpt":0.33140042998520314,"score_spread":0.2772942627311993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024489432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9457594,0.00014993644,0.00015497954,0.05245731,0.000044396562,0.00082242157,0.000021798573,0.000061838175,0.00052792137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860314,0.00024998566,0.008430506,0.00007799765,0.00002758321,0.0000050515155,0.0000025539216,0.0000055400096,0.0051693968],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990329,0.000048491824,0.00017088304,0.00028481352,0.00010336731,0.00035950076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995218,0.00012009678,0.00011946691,0.000113182,0.00006983353,0.000055606633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051079114,0.000109865396,0.00030923326,0.00017592599,0.00027916965,0.000008355624,0.000260776,0.00027975638,0.000044687695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022804811,0.00011445894,0.000051688086,0.00027128856,0.0004651384,0.00012313115,0.000110734196,0.00017633784,0.0000047012204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057052245,0.00041487667,0.8392085,0.00035250437,0.00011902317,0.000013013569,0.036381844,0.00011486468,0.00046283758,0.039080594,0.00698337,0.07629807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042852964,0.0001541462,0.43292314,0.00014597009,0.000027641368,8.468814e-7,0.05329636,0.00017068304,0.00039381254,0.0070886775,0.5010653,0.00044812565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01814125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06452559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4940819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026797663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047159832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98839706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024924570","doi":"","title":"Nothing to Declare: A Response to Grégoire Webber, Eric Mendelsohn, Robert Leckey, and Léonid Sirota on the Effects of the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fulbright Canada; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Declaration; Political science; Charter; Secularism; Nothing; State (computer science); Section (typography); Consistency (knowledge bases); Philosophy; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01874151271847742,"score_gpt":0.2758716884490087,"score_spread":0.2571301757305313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024924570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.840253,0.0012175977,0.00021838445,0.15703885,0.00021689496,0.0007223116,0.0000017579029,0.000028439545,0.00030277282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940663,0.0007795239,0.00007834025,0.0040688477,0.0002911973,0.000020441536,8.3040376e-8,0.000020101299,0.000675151],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996406,0.0008437123,0.00027565839,0.00026950773,0.0007391652,0.0014659364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814236,0.0011744672,0.00017198488,0.00015472136,0.00011265489,0.00024383752],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002463903,0.00020569256,0.00026883953,0.000042666794,0.0020871146,0.00015387617,0.0006021327,0.000084383704,0.000012177137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005370559,0.000112508074,0.00013392906,0.0006804214,0.00017253225,0.00014601609,0.00021766083,0.0013088336,0.000012076605],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036114305,0.0001623262,0.005737421,0.00009659214,0.0009720412,0.0000271272,0.74365085,0.00026344048,0.08508736,0.13696606,0.0049040634,0.018521259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0080202175,0.011670208,0.05512483,0.0027818452,0.00093274633,0.00016814131,0.4409754,0.00030111507,0.022977721,0.03736872,0.41622862,0.0034504347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007053329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038216177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41132453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014255716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007110472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025288005","doi":"","title":"Issues of Vulnerability and Equality: The Emerging Need for Court Evaluations of Physicians' Fiduciary Duties in High Stakes End-of-Life Decisions.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Supreme court; Legislation; Law; Health care; Government (linguistics); Political science; Right to die; Duty","score_opus":0.16079091232259646,"score_gpt":0.4081624434655288,"score_spread":0.24737153114293237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025288005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792641,0.0011764301,0.000023336943,0.017491436,0.00018254838,0.0010908995,0.00006921227,0.000008760941,0.0006933123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99876004,0.00032478044,0.00024961118,0.00003541324,0.00009053822,0.00041210587,0.00000231582,0.000003982936,0.00012120732],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848646,0.00031468138,0.00038095016,0.00015181465,0.00043471667,0.00023138797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739975,0.0015682733,0.00040608144,0.0002533101,0.00033950407,0.00003310749],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032310812,0.00008326564,0.00033542997,0.000028120934,0.0008277258,0.000037354515,0.0003099691,0.00004969042,0.000010860794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011534045,0.00005713161,0.00007045603,0.000090946676,0.0012263244,0.00023787923,0.00009613784,0.000066964014,1.3205862e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015157423,0.0003095731,0.32410482,0.0001415817,0.00025269494,1.3010347e-7,0.20871498,0.00010667024,0.00020020614,0.038987007,0.0021339494,0.4248968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036765556,0.000010496679,0.94633216,0.000027910855,0.000032386088,7.463544e-9,0.04016929,0.000038444403,0.0005349009,0.010277155,0.0021359671,0.00007360515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033617184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013984151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6222274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050251372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059183607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026428217","doi":"","title":"ACPNS Legal Case Notes Series: 2018-46 Friends of Toronto Public Cemeteries Inc. v. Mount Pleasant Group of Cemeteries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Mount; Economic Justice; Law; Corporate governance; Statutory law; Political science; Archaeology; History; Public administration; Engineering; Management","score_opus":0.02608446234991215,"score_gpt":0.2602026360455099,"score_spread":0.23411817369559776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026428217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98955655,0.00020778905,0.0001763473,0.0027874606,0.0001993005,0.00026259568,0.00013112539,0.00015230196,0.0065265014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99424785,0.0005670313,0.0046319133,0.0000088879215,0.000047433376,0.000001410668,0.0000059933845,0.000009284151,0.00048018355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998406,0.000108092136,0.00033534557,0.00036480956,0.0003518472,0.00043390336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983406,0.00009542362,0.00042862236,0.00041131515,0.0006260948,0.00009795126],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003501071,0.0002178111,0.00055748457,0.00014702333,0.0007979683,0.000021341973,0.00066411594,0.00036752917,0.000736587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042123732,0.00020790078,0.00013598276,0.00035936222,0.0053198016,0.0008100448,0.0006900356,0.00016544765,0.000012190923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012496085,0.001102408,0.25371435,0.0005054881,0.0020925663,0.00058914616,0.13057771,0.0000014217811,0.035593767,0.53966385,0.0030596205,0.031850018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017254985,0.0015691102,0.06897013,0.00015135699,0.0002718672,0.00006737234,0.27926472,0.000014334073,0.015760327,0.001846408,0.6295008,0.00085806544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17335741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17361385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6264412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032331713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010074297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026456222","doi":"10.1017/cls.2019.43","title":"Constitutional Law and Abortion in Saskatchewan:<i>The Freedom of Informed Choice (Abortions) Act</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitutionality; Law; Appeal; Abortion; Political science; Jurisdiction; Legislature; Politics; Legislation; Constitution","score_opus":0.020157667905535928,"score_gpt":0.27234238411107026,"score_spread":0.25218471620553434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026456222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97026837,0.0009158479,0.00001533344,0.017427238,0.00031246094,0.0003520496,0.000087688975,0.0000072181588,0.010613796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994095,0.00026338495,0.00015108612,0.0050775236,0.00031662738,0.0000067225496,0.0000046508753,0.000006283206,0.00007868984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986038,0.00012742706,0.00050776807,0.00015973851,0.00016928319,0.00043196435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980032,0.00037867954,0.00032318957,0.000075703814,0.00035367315,0.00086556195],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080207334,0.00014363762,0.000372266,0.000018991053,0.0010159663,0.000098249526,0.00022273365,0.00014965094,0.000041684176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054305204,0.00012657161,0.00015856767,0.0002665617,0.0029036321,0.00044928456,0.000022598582,0.0004434559,5.287251e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009140793,0.000016680591,0.014774917,0.00005882079,0.00014366576,0.000024545976,0.41362762,0.00006408614,0.000034520308,0.56978554,0.00088129356,0.000579184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022086534,0.00023339591,0.052619006,0.00020418009,0.00018560854,0.000029653535,0.6151121,0.00007209327,0.000014728252,0.0029130324,0.3259525,0.00045502704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5767121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98547775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5668725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006373733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015786325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033746043","doi":"10.21991/cf29403","title":"The Conscientious Objection of Medical Practitioners to the CPSO’s “Effective Referral” Requirement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Immorality; Conscientious objector; Law; Freedom of religion; Plaintiff; Sociology; Action (physics); Morality; Political science; Human rights","score_opus":0.040560526158433426,"score_gpt":0.3362132885655212,"score_spread":0.29565276240708777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033746043","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071019684,0.0016380971,0.053991355,0.84052265,0.0054517905,0.0038456726,0.00020333953,0.000303815,0.08694132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99338675,0.00032364018,0.00018689474,0.0050221644,0.00046223137,0.00031674354,0.00002693339,0.000006318203,0.00026834322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995634,0.00041929886,0.00061859126,0.0004666443,0.0021524508,0.00070902385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973629,0.00084972417,0.00030478946,0.00024135891,0.0007788304,0.00046236182],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018598214,0.00024832864,0.00029493734,0.000058738755,0.007619557,0.00020315264,0.00079238514,0.00020123314,0.00030543306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077039227,0.00015464818,0.00024596057,0.0008429936,0.012024296,0.0005200881,0.00034692106,0.00042834852,0.00025902587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008105047,0.00005268322,0.0012583387,0.000009397787,0.00013014984,0.000005062594,0.0024581326,0.00057027576,0.00011894102,0.94166636,0.051660985,0.001988638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071392383,0.00010486894,0.00068919326,0.00009493736,0.00006485273,0.000018729606,0.03558293,0.00023709108,0.00016647011,0.002504996,0.9595571,0.00026491116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018828019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068435883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9862848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056973175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017951108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034336303","doi":"","title":"The State of the Canadian Appointment Process After Liberal Reforms","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Process (computing); Political science; Public administration; Computer science","score_opus":0.02281408493943598,"score_gpt":0.24441896579537115,"score_spread":0.22160488085593516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034336303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9571456,0.0001956788,8.334683e-7,0.034710873,0.00012420228,0.00047659528,0.00005207469,0.000027024196,0.0072671217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99539894,0.000054816777,0.00005643678,0.00039244173,0.000058009966,0.000001561725,0.0000021342191,0.000009267323,0.004026394],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980573,0.0002618678,0.0001729606,0.00025447563,0.0007663553,0.0004870614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881226,0.00007638823,0.00022154601,0.00022708619,0.0003107691,0.00035197072],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006206556,0.00015125163,0.00022155257,0.000032526907,0.003128469,0.000060908533,0.0010460374,0.00011521958,0.00016705783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025433348,0.00010023764,0.00020619045,0.0005357382,0.0011770795,0.00049059006,0.0002777951,0.00038367126,0.000052283885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070333225,0.00008989943,0.41720644,0.00015109735,0.000469033,0.000035164427,0.56905115,0.000106106454,0.00049074367,0.0018513874,0.0018444847,0.008001183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074283715,0.000093108276,0.8983505,0.00007047309,0.00008264684,6.937786e-7,0.036516156,0.000015706153,0.00069007184,0.0016475681,0.061467193,0.00032304417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078363664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6998441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62148046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005429083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004249738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035835799","doi":"","title":"Ktunaxa Nation v. British Columbia: A Historical and Critical Analysis of Canadian Aboriginal Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Rim law & policy journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; History; Geography","score_opus":0.03663714682865829,"score_gpt":0.3253964875997724,"score_spread":0.2887593407711141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035835799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31052762,0.0032494213,0.00008424616,0.17931321,0.00086756743,0.00045247973,0.00033195657,0.00011775937,0.5050557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963988,0.00076768023,0.00027567262,0.0010021338,0.001036269,0.0000041468265,0.0000034090972,0.00000873176,0.0005031652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998009,0.00026059488,0.00038485182,0.00022332104,0.0005933229,0.00052886625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981748,0.00021129196,0.00013064226,0.00006264739,0.00041038997,0.0010102703],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004846779,0.000102502665,0.0004105374,0.00013591083,0.0019965502,0.00065805065,0.0001880803,0.00013179437,0.00030323284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009014023,0.00013068781,0.00019174113,0.001624484,0.00082068687,0.0003146457,0.000020127445,0.0003459722,0.000005604371],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002302918,0.00010973099,0.05281597,0.000042827676,0.001090138,0.00017176603,0.068330094,0.000013817099,0.00013850672,0.82278585,0.051139213,0.0033390243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030099595,0.000077569755,0.027765961,0.000022419496,0.00050817296,0.00002662218,0.0063545047,0.000052653737,0.000003765775,0.0031882112,0.96143746,0.00026165415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98775446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98202854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9102982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012682443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044249315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035901377","doi":"10.1017/9781108894760.007","title":"Too Much Information","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Enthusiasm; Hopefulness; Normative; Contingency; Foundation (evidence); Aside; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Positive economics; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.026157742208499687,"score_gpt":0.24406639980666223,"score_spread":0.21790865759816253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035901377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062046684,0.000043365268,0.0001602365,0.0006495546,0.00022428865,0.00013507168,0.0000215525,0.00011977876,0.9365995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42945564,0.00014219634,0.0003365602,0.00033217837,0.00013021239,0.0000010038273,0.00001927995,0.0000039203196,0.569579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992206,0.00012909071,0.00007790183,0.00011150411,0.00024162141,0.0002192609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938047,0.000052480955,0.000052770753,0.00010920208,0.00030553885,0.00009954784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001078365,0.00007436147,0.000101611135,0.000021183092,0.00084829674,0.00008793761,0.00017663668,0.000078015626,0.00000642403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013575544,0.00008086886,0.00006781857,0.000043146996,0.00019979876,0.00047817893,0.00015728071,0.00009904901,0.000027499731],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013305308,0.0000120104705,0.0001838327,0.0000158195,0.000042641448,0.000036865367,0.009741446,0.0000022594697,0.00011128641,0.91279197,0.07424672,0.0028018334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023785677,0.000004613945,0.0015299169,0.0000071446566,0.000020237247,7.031943e-7,0.016631925,0.000010951282,0.0008552254,0.0000012247842,0.98058724,0.00011296023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004757126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008352988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9127908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023114245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000100990685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7191383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037651573","doi":"","title":"Fundamental Rights for All","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law and economics; Law; Fundamental rights; Political science; Jurisprudence; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.07255290217692785,"score_gpt":0.3769380089216255,"score_spread":0.30438510674469765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037651573","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004174919,0.50667953,0.000026462838,0.03815084,0.0008430006,0.0037059123,0.00014632972,0.00016872668,0.4461043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8362913,0.15200573,0.0002492585,0.010398784,0.00068843307,0.00013801146,0.00007009447,0.000015178752,0.00014317184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988631,0.000054088196,0.00032322964,0.00020298728,0.0002895599,0.00026701015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994534,0.00004190014,0.00015640583,0.000075147036,0.00009320163,0.0001799264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000323693,0.00013615984,0.0003865995,0.0000036895945,0.0005032579,0.000026599366,0.0001692936,0.00004015689,0.000054553544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003070075,0.00008388696,0.00016493243,0.00007829966,0.00045016437,0.0001919939,0.00007150839,0.00009040219,0.00001502947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072612165,0.00003040362,0.000016465274,0.0034444497,0.00003506186,2.0660806e-7,0.002549105,8.853007e-9,0.0000065337535,0.98476756,0.0022133386,0.006929605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023360278,0.00006669619,0.00002300292,0.0012791795,0.00006229715,1.9158088e-7,0.0002422626,0.0000015066958,0.00003735337,0.0010743793,0.9968523,0.00012725926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036704796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002268258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9946389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009161186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016055867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5548692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037701917","doi":"","title":"The Price of God","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Conviction; Damages; Plaintiff; Law; Jurisprudence; Duty; Multiculturalism; Political science; Charter; Duty to warn; Sociology","score_opus":0.05064240720482203,"score_gpt":0.3521020444818382,"score_spread":0.30145963727701613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037701917","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012287357,0.565403,0.0000042732727,0.029346734,0.000243596,0.00079327764,0.000014434483,0.00003677623,0.4029292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51336914,0.4846168,0.00002908382,0.0017153912,0.00017059837,0.00002042775,0.0000036228023,0.000005681972,0.00006926279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988619,0.000097526536,0.000356989,0.0001282811,0.000355479,0.00019981519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933124,0.00008074009,0.00024057638,0.00010289775,0.000141739,0.000102794475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057000865,0.00009852682,0.0003228702,0.0000021759088,0.0005113751,0.00001681467,0.00023866876,0.000029106168,0.000025248568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000119550845,0.000049246773,0.0001174641,0.0001537098,0.0007749222,0.00011904447,0.000103082035,0.00011126302,0.000008240201],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003601345,0.00001569719,0.00003125207,0.0025965488,0.000021529837,9.724664e-8,0.0024228345,1.3051231e-8,0.000005903344,0.97255975,0.0007385574,0.021604242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008756405,0.00003289548,0.000111982976,0.0013729692,0.000033102784,1.1654269e-7,0.00056428567,7.5259845e-7,0.000042844724,0.00031934914,0.9973645,0.00006964459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024971338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009708529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99662596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043790555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025415393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39331356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30387997","doi":"10.1023/a:1009433703175","title":"Beyond the Myths: Equality, Impartiality, and Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Dignity; Economic Justice; Law; Supreme court; Mythology; Political science; Human rights; Legislature; Sociology","score_opus":0.0348957093887775,"score_gpt":0.3421791049199109,"score_spread":0.3072833955311334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30387997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93663996,0.0039445627,0.000032813758,0.043488063,0.0005473996,0.00018399741,0.000018300108,0.00001042629,0.015134488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940687,0.0038049358,0.000007053317,0.00030422854,0.0014441576,0.000004172491,5.5181687e-7,0.0000052325304,0.00036097429],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982291,0.00056834216,0.00033994546,0.00009423447,0.0005063584,0.00026200834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987449,0.00050610385,0.00037560434,0.000059290673,0.00021578469,0.00009832102],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018279841,0.000114268485,0.00037096164,0.000013317302,0.0026009118,0.00031997895,0.00029166785,0.000074491,0.000037203306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027763227,0.00005400737,0.00012968393,0.00015369148,0.0019538752,0.00020814328,0.00014257895,0.00026373548,0.0000014249473],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003813595,0.0001112321,0.005764677,0.00007204031,0.00031419608,0.000019813584,0.28283587,0.000003423675,0.000023002796,0.6786211,0.0021499204,0.02970337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043342593,0.00008092046,0.1923863,0.000070992486,0.0009756753,0.000031653624,0.6600223,0.00003130602,0.000014908169,0.061592627,0.080039084,0.0004199632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017997494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019525822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6170285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005589682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003534474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038822611","doi":"","title":"ACPNS Legal Case Notes Series: 2020-72Karahalios v. Conservative Party of Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Series (stratigraphy); Political science; Law; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.019512049678941108,"score_gpt":0.2353725101636172,"score_spread":0.2158604604846761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038822611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92884094,0.000063032036,0.000033393488,0.063009284,0.000054763095,0.0002389225,0.00009821527,0.00009801708,0.007563432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99767756,0.00010921598,0.000997435,0.0001055851,0.000022379934,4.674128e-7,0.0000021359285,0.0000043976474,0.0010808305],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989658,0.00007344404,0.00016918671,0.000265722,0.00024115718,0.00028469975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990983,0.000115297706,0.00020787753,0.00015503027,0.00029903522,0.00012444898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012382814,0.00013353895,0.0003564359,0.00004140857,0.00056891044,0.0000066112193,0.00038125078,0.00019141445,0.00029108478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061555323,0.00013421272,0.00007278844,0.0005182639,0.0012311277,0.00017027944,0.00026161104,0.0002314663,0.0000063700063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074762583,0.00030844097,0.6567527,0.000351875,0.0015878696,0.009682055,0.12804323,0.00010848717,0.0029404555,0.08982905,0.1032812,0.0063669896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015831052,0.00023568343,0.045537565,0.000089978916,0.0001554487,0.00004960447,0.28797522,0.00004747604,0.006314861,0.0006967321,0.6566801,0.00063421205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68217987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8067457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6112152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015785225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004331583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5473036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039686058","doi":"10.12745/et.23.1.4174","title":"How Marston Read His Merchant: Ruled Women and Structures of Circulation in The Dutch Courtesan","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Early Theatre","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dramaturgy; Romance; Revels; Comedy; Art; Literature; HERO; Embodied cognition; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029906392756716395,"score_gpt":0.2707837065411239,"score_spread":0.2408773137844075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039686058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95738417,0.00037024086,0.0000034706748,0.038910195,0.000036668527,0.00025123436,0.000007024147,0.0000198963,0.003017074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993781,0.00008875264,0.00006395705,0.0002553523,0.0001107116,0.0000114635295,0.0000015559115,0.0000047377603,0.0000854044],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989909,0.00028621772,0.000099802666,0.00013869563,0.0003035487,0.0001808456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965495,0.00013006837,0.00006445248,0.00006588854,0.000035926005,0.00004872167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034419892,0.00008090054,0.00015355858,0.000015329324,0.00021731989,0.000078837795,0.00014818663,0.000058614933,0.000042013206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012206453,0.000050760747,0.000030123352,0.00018487159,0.00019471394,0.00016741117,0.000033919077,0.00011830429,0.0000015360731],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025217201,0.000013121789,0.057565752,0.00002088895,0.00002955626,0.0000028770226,0.9260256,0.0000076849,0.0010836524,0.0055548768,0.00020111351,0.009469621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040698357,0.000083187944,0.8795544,0.000016108082,0.000014971905,4.0422404e-7,0.10535891,0.000034873992,0.00004379332,0.00549441,0.0088456245,0.00014633202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042112856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011913409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82198864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059421014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018246677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6366232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040625182","doi":"","title":"Alberta v. Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony (Women's Court of Canada)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Section (typography); Law; Context (archaeology); High Court; Political science; Government (linguistics); History; Business","score_opus":0.008182076945008415,"score_gpt":0.2604739607944227,"score_spread":0.25229188384941426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3040625182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97496396,0.0005314737,0.000027368324,0.008594976,0.0003927149,0.00014257732,0.0000053934473,0.0000068142726,0.015334698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909609,0.0006141297,0.000033257482,0.00009604811,0.00050080416,0.0000037262182,5.89984e-7,0.000009056118,0.007781485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969212,0.000171626,0.00031166035,0.00012931188,0.0006306603,0.001835568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896055,0.000116662704,0.0003372167,0.000093762195,0.00036238108,0.00012940321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014735691,0.00011718596,0.00028623967,0.00002956101,0.00068786443,0.000019153405,0.00036895555,0.00008040561,0.00019361057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033286234,0.000096056305,0.000068104484,0.00019859504,0.00054662034,0.00013506305,0.000042746506,0.0004930285,0.0000032550302],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00092894665,0.0005314221,0.09340153,0.00010667375,0.00356137,0.0000122693655,0.3049467,0.000018168816,0.01373253,0.49378052,0.059767757,0.029212106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002959637,0.002992104,0.036855143,0.0001823821,0.00019539357,0.000060570255,0.36774212,0.000032858974,0.003488461,0.08252715,0.5018648,0.0010994092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.735938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9882845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.442097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026772849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005810574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041932618","doi":"","title":"Ontario's Human Rights Tribunal Bungles the School Boards' Human Rights Duty to Accommodate Students with Disabilities: \"J.F. v. Waterloo Cathofic District School Board\" - An Erroneous Rejection of a Student's Request to Bring His Autism Service Dog to School","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Duty; Human rights; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03166711377603512,"score_gpt":0.31535381446435784,"score_spread":0.2836867006883227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041932618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850435,0.000038073085,0.00045372488,0.008276867,0.00023470564,0.0026623525,0.00016801755,0.00019008438,0.0029326652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952008,0.0000027525534,0.0007909891,0.0006896993,0.00064741104,0.00032708352,0.00010650429,0.000020096897,0.002214649],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958359,0.00037048478,0.00080333237,0.0008718959,0.0014508006,0.0006675688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969867,0.00020543253,0.00027523318,0.00045271884,0.0009384246,0.00114151],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008855423,0.0004051605,0.000572128,0.00016816494,0.004371339,0.0005494099,0.0012853292,0.0001864646,0.00045698264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065338553,0.0003303893,0.00015132246,0.0010386336,0.0004218808,0.0008951847,0.00032562783,0.0005512821,0.00024974014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050353975,0.0018787025,0.49111316,0.00032579037,0.0010166846,0.00009930672,0.27587432,0.014050991,0.0029848896,0.2073016,0.004725301,0.00012569186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025079576,0.0008116861,0.9117185,0.0007571956,0.0004097844,0.00002865739,0.017505119,0.000048493148,0.00037217463,0.004900925,0.059530325,0.0014092029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3510974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7336094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4206053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055841557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049020746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043873528","doi":"10.3138/9781487514976","title":"A Reconciliation without Recollection?: An Investigation of the Foundations of Aboriginal Law in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Recall; Law; Political science; History; Psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.03354133464071995,"score_gpt":0.30882682894395913,"score_spread":0.2752854943032392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043873528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11523247,0.000046531222,0.0000025812199,0.0016506262,0.0011162546,0.00121534,0.000049865295,0.000017362005,0.880669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3680181,0.00007866253,0.00026009534,0.00016443059,0.00015400909,0.000032088894,0.000039004797,0.0000108548065,0.63124275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858254,0.00021985696,0.00037678864,0.00016972722,0.0005189288,0.00013215856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987868,0.00015848201,0.00045465518,0.0001475355,0.00041307756,0.000039420403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037076024,0.00011106032,0.00026404226,0.00003433093,0.00030936816,0.000017080223,0.00020773074,0.00013557237,0.00018630188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010462414,0.000080735765,0.000053097683,0.00024717062,0.00032107838,0.0002161319,0.000016930926,0.00017658416,0.000002754874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039980594,0.00004716871,0.31030715,0.00031442512,0.00021899406,3.5691673e-7,0.08849023,0.000392188,0.00016673112,0.54174805,0.057023693,0.0012510744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009842301,0.00012162662,0.2590386,0.0007309519,0.0001830133,4.6893084e-7,0.0223314,0.00025780904,0.00029695057,0.022190165,0.6930382,0.00082656817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99418825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6360145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037020599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009895626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99571735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044446119","doi":"","title":"“Sunny ways” and broken promises : Tsleil-Waututh Nation v. Canada (2018) and the Liberal government’s relationship with Indigenous Nations in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Saint Mary's University Institutional Repository (Saint Mary's University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Government (linguistics); Political economy; Public administration; Law; Development economics; Economic history; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.009079590372363196,"score_gpt":0.16632138077604358,"score_spread":0.1572417904036804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044446119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9335368,0.00010247451,0.000039998526,0.0037178805,0.00033494932,0.000982249,0.00006491485,0.000037359816,0.061183374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849726,0.00013600446,0.00020003966,0.00010754646,0.000051656803,0.0000013404473,0.00002087093,0.0000070576457,0.014502882],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976204,0.0003816559,0.00018957953,0.00043571653,0.0009775573,0.0003951112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985471,0.00065539416,0.00020311463,0.00017382842,0.00020856869,0.0002119992],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029828225,0.00023300368,0.0002766863,0.00016031959,0.0035058656,0.00007687241,0.00034981658,0.000112816386,0.000024160896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016045509,0.00020894868,0.000049065096,0.000702286,0.00093600166,0.0007487168,0.0002486266,0.00037545562,0.0000019176148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089683343,0.0000820404,0.5444311,0.00007286979,0.00024156316,0.00064406585,0.008065675,0.0016239575,0.000020948732,0.4429765,0.0006249233,0.00031951847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00452793,0.00009750508,0.68212146,0.0001652925,0.00016935644,0.00004164635,0.043358695,0.00036300145,0.00001191217,0.00022014279,0.26822144,0.00070164463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.994987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44275638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019941904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006039261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046699092","doi":"10.29173/alr2604","title":"Sexual Regulation and the Law: A Canadian Perspective, Richard Jochelson and James Gacek, eds. (Bradford, Ont: Demeter Press, 2019)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Art","score_opus":0.030927180362360314,"score_gpt":0.2905075060323167,"score_spread":0.25958032566995637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046699092","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045499913,0.5750603,0.0000011310059,0.31671035,0.00010193125,0.0017650763,0.0000150310725,0.000032306772,0.101763844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74371827,0.22240952,0.0001766466,0.02894523,0.00048682524,0.0001376765,0.00001292147,0.000026495387,0.004086427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856734,0.00037301178,0.00020519379,0.00031495752,0.00023693993,0.00030253458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990231,0.00037241873,0.000100267855,0.00012247599,0.000118262076,0.00026348274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039223334,0.00016618198,0.00037787517,0.0000056073127,0.0009881264,0.00013639586,0.00016572312,0.00007360461,0.00011276752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006987154,0.00010301615,0.00006277072,0.00012902757,0.00079743995,0.0003006134,0.0000765608,0.0001458613,0.000027962946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015694082,0.000007581681,0.00040634532,0.00030798337,0.00013482901,0.0000012861188,0.042303026,3.6102415e-7,0.0000034663199,0.9097627,0.04268303,0.0043737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002964831,0.000021078276,0.000763814,0.0001892104,0.00015932172,0.0000012660058,0.001682395,0.000014941769,0.000002385953,0.0005650484,0.9961363,0.00016776852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95749956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91994536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95345324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010688877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048008613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75999695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048673838","doi":"","title":"Pour que droit et familles fassent bon ménage : étude sur la conscience du droit en matière conjugale Making Law and Families Work Together: A Study on Legal Consciousness in Conjugal Setting","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Humanities; Legal consciousness; Political science; Sociology; Law; Ethnology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011462741753346672,"score_gpt":0.28314728964878083,"score_spread":0.27168454789543417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048673838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96444935,0.012011494,0.00014390689,0.0066438722,0.00090344046,0.0009273823,0.000013625062,0.00006833743,0.014838607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99098194,0.0049158144,0.0001408863,0.00067250786,0.0007971455,0.000043500226,0.0000012779043,0.000051940777,0.0023950194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908653,0.0023897765,0.0008751977,0.000623625,0.0011075734,0.004138555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961989,0.0025611864,0.0005400145,0.00020395235,0.00021243143,0.00028351488],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010109705,0.00061273755,0.00084480515,0.00015111166,0.001676913,0.0005943279,0.00063159224,0.00032406405,0.000045703655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008961048,0.0005649108,0.00020456218,0.0006501052,0.0015141935,0.0014372388,0.00030777522,0.0034147627,0.000041826508],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013286946,0.0008204069,0.30770135,0.00003555089,0.00034058982,0.00006768766,0.09784337,0.000077590485,0.00012422189,0.5855097,0.00013419855,0.0072124605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039461507,0.0007262165,0.25778607,0.0010440777,0.000251631,0.0004454831,0.7093665,0.0001136748,0.000033745277,0.017384477,0.007559136,0.0013428404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018900236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12760302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61152315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038926569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014518792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048850375","doi":"","title":"Book Review: D’un océan à l’autre . . . recension de Nicole Laviolette et Julie Audet, L’essentiel du droit de la famille dans les provinces et territoires de common law au Canada","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016499674226058882,"score_gpt":0.280056274338826,"score_spread":0.26355660011276716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048850375","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2082367,0.27270868,0.000023188735,0.33181718,0.0022519252,0.0006690233,0.00038727708,0.000027902324,0.18387811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8197124,0.08440149,0.00046594624,0.082973436,0.0011472204,0.000018756044,0.000012403773,0.000062438354,0.011205919],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954504,0.0015603902,0.0007448872,0.00032412022,0.0006264065,0.001293803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99632347,0.00044739206,0.0009823403,0.0003875524,0.0003266137,0.0015326259],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023423668,0.00042214495,0.00079151994,0.0000429595,0.0048987037,0.0005186359,0.0013399291,0.00035617925,0.000104407125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005418133,0.0003935042,0.0003109647,0.00011800716,0.0029066035,0.0008492814,0.00011311957,0.001083961,0.000005115082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016676475,0.00006326645,0.033119816,0.00037514992,0.0002294441,0.0016242979,0.010504909,0.000094152085,0.0002731999,0.045060977,0.9044901,0.004147999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000443692,0.00007566758,0.06746161,0.0037423107,0.00023294918,0.00013057576,0.0035615787,0.000024264447,0.00013069196,0.00066313735,0.9231029,0.00043061745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99794537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6114757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067435913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011460705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W305587855","doi":"","title":"A Note on the Role of North America in the Evolution of Anglicanism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecclesiology; Windsor; Bishops; History; Law; Colonialism; Convention; Eucharist; Archbishop; Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy; Classics; Political science","score_opus":0.028137654460657472,"score_gpt":0.31848512178875443,"score_spread":0.29034746732809696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W305587855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61958677,0.10931361,0.000028739132,0.09342612,0.000045464352,0.0026681982,0.000028821369,0.00006339312,0.17483892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762288,0.020595565,0.00007639976,0.0028887603,0.00007858275,0.0000695408,0.0000011555938,0.000002602362,0.000058612924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980487,0.0009080824,0.00030451536,0.00015035499,0.0003621402,0.0002261965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984552,0.0009818734,0.00022641954,0.00021677277,0.00008622232,0.000033459197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010056153,0.00010249632,0.0003264711,0.000013106105,0.00018953378,0.000005583301,0.0005602857,0.000041600815,0.00024225957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020232678,0.00004221871,0.00015888996,0.00056923466,0.0009880535,0.00004237377,0.00006227092,0.00017884781,0.00003338665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020659185,0.00030446472,0.009179088,0.000072828465,0.000027572645,0.0000016872701,0.016684864,0.000009850798,0.000056823115,0.6794334,0.0015515857,0.29265717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014321537,0.0002955949,0.20170718,0.0005463137,0.000073193136,7.707747e-7,0.009595923,0.000024163675,0.00003577423,0.009003807,0.77836543,0.0002086449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002567845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030388557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7768138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115521034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035107532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38818306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W306376142","doi":"","title":"The roman catholic-united church dialogue in Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of ecumenical studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bishops; Protestantism; Church history; Context (archaeology); Canon law; Law; Sociology; Christianity; Religious studies; Political science; Theology; History; Classics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.057315119776066015,"score_gpt":0.34468726783328,"score_spread":0.287372148057214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W306376142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9684665,0.009617207,8.451669e-7,0.01437146,0.0008625133,0.00015196881,0.0000017061056,0.0000061428013,0.00652164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924635,0.006455071,0.00009307345,0.00031294714,0.0002199294,0.000007959039,1.540466e-7,0.000005699522,0.00044162577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974346,0.0006601158,0.0006020527,0.00011200854,0.00071917445,0.00047205988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973449,0.0017092808,0.0003057325,0.00008934505,0.0004083808,0.00014237611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018583722,0.00013658649,0.00039550936,0.00004013201,0.0012240754,0.00005774535,0.0003435458,0.000051287596,0.000020362048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006927571,0.000075537544,0.000112187336,0.00046546228,0.0004725077,0.00013911842,0.00007304038,0.00040642335,0.0000038016763],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000252683,0.00046009207,0.39601737,0.0000615088,0.002566167,0.0007233709,0.25557855,0.0005055786,0.0003013642,0.13180545,0.20034923,0.011378645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006379754,0.0000775792,0.10572398,0.00005102412,0.000045347428,0.000008003992,0.08846753,0.000002144274,0.00003859407,0.0017323486,0.80301416,0.00020129338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6840645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97780824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60266495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017356811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063054165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94147223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3071865145","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v10i2.9478","title":"On Sexual Consent in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Spouse; Criminal code; Criminal law; Dilemma; KISS (TNC); Context (archaeology); Sexual assault; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine; Medical emergency; Computer science","score_opus":0.10991924886255602,"score_gpt":0.3537178499598585,"score_spread":0.24379860109730248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3071865145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94827706,0.002864185,0.000002469146,0.046691943,0.0005449993,0.00010485916,0.000004013005,0.000007996557,0.001502493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99642646,0.0005194375,0.00002976477,0.0022678904,0.00046530747,0.0000020355988,1.0841566e-7,0.0000060245334,0.00028299287],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982314,0.00020696854,0.00044132082,0.00012717587,0.0006953593,0.000297781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876744,0.00053154374,0.0002583049,0.000040285628,0.00022645123,0.00017598725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003170066,0.00013611183,0.00042999492,0.000025193598,0.00028077653,0.000041590167,0.00023175846,0.000027127311,0.00002146717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013414454,0.00009753624,0.000056035566,0.0001715719,0.00020837858,0.00018015092,0.000071163995,0.00030426445,0.000010562892],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043607372,0.00013248376,0.5999963,0.00012670693,0.0009775666,0.0016224568,0.3143017,0.0009215235,0.00017103294,0.0038188694,0.072220474,0.0052748173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021439022,0.00081945956,0.14885901,0.000309723,0.000084740386,0.000017113793,0.5368238,0.000007470816,0.00011790419,0.00014173817,0.3101156,0.00055954495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7353194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98069483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4511373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010135112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084475894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39774126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080466347","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190922771.003.0003","title":"The Metropolis in “Old World” Constitutional Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stalemate; Megacity; Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Constitutional law; Sovereignty; Constitutionalism; Urbanization; Political economy; Law; Economy; Sociology; Democracy; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.05235630775962753,"score_gpt":0.3117262499952617,"score_spread":0.2593699422356342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080466347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002015656,0.0011258296,0.000003928606,0.026797514,0.00045483885,0.00031792792,0.000022637965,0.00007582074,0.9711995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023157263,0.00073774345,0.00013125512,0.0017669322,0.00072154746,0.000016108048,0.000008241241,0.0000091222655,0.9734518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855375,0.00005188051,0.00026049523,0.00025967677,0.0005905439,0.00028363336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914676,0.00043927386,0.000098913435,0.00010171148,0.00010350906,0.00010984729],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028491957,0.000198421,0.0002756293,0.00002912043,0.0014276924,0.0001362211,0.00034657793,0.00015811155,0.0015862365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016778192,0.00012095525,0.00015596529,0.00007826217,0.00489835,0.000091974136,0.00014236891,0.00040889386,0.0005473198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003668646,0.0000027001834,0.00003631603,0.000002578891,0.00004777635,0.000006882805,0.00085305504,4.7516568e-7,3.2263839e-7,0.97638273,0.022312636,0.00035084298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008681393,0.0000047523304,0.000035441797,0.000023044064,0.000016231128,1.326904e-7,0.0009424024,8.346735e-7,0.0000013807954,0.052819356,0.9458972,0.00017236221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017859826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2371635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92358464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054968795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013271814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082707933","doi":"10.3138/9781487533915-009","title":"7. The Constitution of Canada and Beyond","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.020435847335075114,"score_gpt":0.21309275748465667,"score_spread":0.19265691014958156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082707933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003430784,0.0025574544,0.0000024000506,0.00029266652,0.00011780956,0.00019932662,0.00006191558,0.0000098408145,0.9967243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023043698,0.002469639,0.00007677066,0.000023975705,0.00006149432,1.2100631e-7,0.0000023421846,0.000004064712,0.9743179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937636,0.000029849263,0.000086730885,0.00012117372,0.00028343857,0.00010243351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941796,0.000108702545,0.00018340023,0.000077581644,0.00013855255,0.000073794545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007468718,0.00009209681,0.00019335728,0.0000019078532,0.00069336634,0.000008702349,0.00021101629,0.00009945298,0.00004011296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029648683,0.00007993714,0.00005125585,4.7536903e-7,0.0013165264,0.00004590019,0.00014027266,0.00007604622,1.7392577e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026984077,0.0000012150232,0.000006492273,0.0000270922,0.00013112882,0.0000051123175,0.019499408,4.6160775e-7,0.000007887947,0.9689324,0.008655527,0.0027063247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010551342,0.000013001615,0.000055177235,0.000027593127,0.000065287124,8.499277e-8,0.0022635537,0.0000012385922,0.000012260683,0.00031707206,0.99705374,0.000085480286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99145705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033925942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000330085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53328836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085997748","doi":"10.1177/0067205x20955069","title":"Indigenous Constitutionalism and Dispute Resolution Outside the Courts: An Invitation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Law; Indigenous rights; Institution; Political science; Liberalism; Supreme court; Sociology; Constitutional law; Human rights; Democracy","score_opus":0.06827181375930244,"score_gpt":0.3446184206711721,"score_spread":0.27634660691186963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3085997748","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039704684,0.37788352,0.00029401842,0.53364265,0.000573389,0.004237428,0.00008722402,0.0003769791,0.043200087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89365864,0.057313517,0.0004916069,0.04769119,0.0005519365,0.00011724049,0.00004084677,0.00000802344,0.00012702163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877465,0.00037254128,0.00019238699,0.0001791856,0.00029189282,0.00018933766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995219,0.00008991181,0.000094437164,0.00006619789,0.00010345088,0.00012406884],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004605424,0.00009664144,0.00018252504,0.0000029881649,0.0023320082,0.00013817204,0.00012700503,0.000044399305,0.00004146115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003381096,0.000060763894,0.000049420665,0.00009161142,0.00055450515,0.00033543666,0.000044276614,0.00011582399,0.000037531005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006999815,0.00002137406,0.0006871209,0.0003436393,0.000038513095,0.0000047261206,0.027546804,0.0000056643607,0.000015635207,0.9512915,0.013687492,0.00635052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097416836,0.000030154082,0.0023469396,0.0002604116,0.000040486946,0.0000016271945,0.000702719,0.000013517525,0.0000018243111,0.0011011685,0.99528044,0.00012331389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069248625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003772651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98159295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000795029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005503572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3086547516","doi":"","title":"ACPNS Legal Case Notes Series: 2020-119 Council of Canadians with Disabilities v. British Columbia (Attorney General)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Madam; Constitutionality; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.02179548739385438,"score_gpt":0.21342346473489474,"score_spread":0.19162797734104037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3086547516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9793048,0.00009223978,0.000018489454,0.013224243,0.000046140598,0.00029474666,0.00023340339,0.00015124748,0.0066346796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99304533,0.00021487154,0.0016876628,0.000052154603,0.000041594216,0.0000011072308,0.0000034515933,0.000008599693,0.0049452055],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987224,0.000059604914,0.00016800204,0.00034913156,0.0003620843,0.0003387944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889934,0.00007768776,0.00015019617,0.00019024704,0.00051598833,0.00016656384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016138914,0.00012335443,0.000391741,0.000023686413,0.00075948617,0.000046135556,0.00040472185,0.00023501801,0.00048235492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066955254,0.00016289542,0.000084574465,0.00044328196,0.0025594537,0.0002404737,0.00018227437,0.00022107257,0.000009283735],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013611284,0.0001474145,0.88411134,0.0002104433,0.0004946368,0.0026068748,0.08251985,0.000037230348,0.0002811972,0.0056516803,0.019316617,0.0044865836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017214415,0.00044587077,0.06012546,0.0001502487,0.00020969624,0.00017577296,0.39934218,0.000025342382,0.00020771327,0.0004975975,0.5363697,0.00072899094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8929842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9719414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8239859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055144884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006699468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94304144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W308702549","doi":"","title":"Protecting the Vulnerable from the Vulnerable: Child Protection and Diversity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forum on public policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Legislation; Child protection; Mandate; Neglect; Public relations; Political science; Law; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.05556074677366692,"score_gpt":0.2844961682675558,"score_spread":0.22893542149388887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W308702549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56849515,0.00029186378,0.000046898516,0.3827092,0.00027084784,0.0014965822,0.000027199821,0.00021095111,0.046451285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993768,0.00016771776,0.000021485486,0.002399136,0.0010657043,0.00012068074,0.0000022310549,0.000008497365,0.0024465974],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688494,0.0016544503,0.00013720986,0.00026320198,0.00048703683,0.00057318644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988015,0.00066682213,0.000121450656,0.0002027294,0.000097235585,0.00011020684],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001974295,0.00014995209,0.00014373835,0.000036572113,0.049522076,0.0002108801,0.00041727698,0.00010673134,0.00006614509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00644069,0.00008024649,0.00006773752,0.00054390146,0.0006422213,0.00041447656,0.00041660096,0.001398053,0.00003569545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011419313,0.0003166599,0.08694093,0.000021983498,0.00046792184,0.000008407595,0.6099155,0.000058792757,0.00014186616,0.12594011,0.07370913,0.10236449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068599987,0.00010729701,0.13776334,0.000033404733,0.000019414256,0.000007884056,0.055593636,0.000096375865,0.00015007847,0.0046534888,0.80053115,0.0003579421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27194834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013334612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.726822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027376335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011572306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9517153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088825059","doi":"10.1017/9781139236249","title":"A.V. Dicey and the Common Law Constitutional Tradition: A Legal Turn of Mind","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Principle of legality; Positive law; Philosophy of law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Constitution; Political science; Legal formalism; Public law; Constitutional law; Philosophy; Power (physics); Sovereignty; Black letter law; Politics; Private law; Physics","score_opus":0.04034143043089519,"score_gpt":0.28982081865892456,"score_spread":0.24947938822802937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088825059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012853633,0.0012850695,0.000008747181,0.019689197,0.0002252971,0.00046726508,0.00013319525,0.000024684892,0.978038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4861248,0.0005450714,0.00023423818,0.0018093389,0.0015846443,0.00003675913,0.000092058115,0.000010789742,0.5095623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868244,0.00015704258,0.00026687072,0.00020154439,0.00054188765,0.00015020711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989807,0.00057591626,0.00017422311,0.00007490988,0.00010315853,0.00009110133],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029666105,0.0001684885,0.0004340745,0.000010627877,0.00089706056,0.00008518235,0.00021395205,0.00019131407,0.00050142687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008056061,0.00009884723,0.0001558494,0.000051124614,0.013568245,0.00013098902,0.00007578166,0.00030952963,0.000027012064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024410485,0.000008413915,0.000009029483,0.000020172714,0.000101417325,0.0000041526505,0.006694747,3.164766e-7,7.197101e-7,0.95124876,0.04162018,0.00026769895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058990263,0.00001994922,0.00006539413,0.00005678059,0.000108920125,0.000002697401,0.0026233173,0.000004145747,0.0000042122765,0.01692423,0.9794482,0.00015222128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004649247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007316299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93782806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001359551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034075076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98911625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092005763","doi":"10.22215/etd/2010-08925","title":"Dual charging practices in cases of domestic violence : perpetuating (in)equalities","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Auteur theory; Art; Political science; Art history","score_opus":0.06788185840692859,"score_gpt":0.418538121976494,"score_spread":0.35065626356956536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092005763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9660511,0.0009875746,2.6930303e-7,0.0002925353,0.00065938226,0.00037646343,0.0000055422,0.00003882751,0.03158833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993416,0.0012289354,0.000359024,0.000018310551,0.00019692128,0.000068950394,0.000035868987,0.000013179268,0.0046628043],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978003,0.00029765774,0.0005543802,0.00033426573,0.0006108645,0.00040253584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99655485,0.0021502492,0.00092151895,0.000106080275,0.00021460433,0.00005269371],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012230139,0.00021838564,0.00046543102,0.00014838764,0.00034134457,0.00008020931,0.00023166508,0.00031782204,0.00032793594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011456333,0.00018525495,0.00007821556,0.00033429978,0.0002110689,0.00044144015,0.000034355104,0.0005871943,0.000012436599],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009262791,0.00021931967,0.049910925,0.0010149735,0.00006063054,0.00013924192,0.9032871,0.00001809884,0.0025311003,0.026281033,0.000051662766,0.01639325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025904053,0.00003605194,0.062420998,0.0016016081,0.000038240203,0.0000019104903,0.9329986,0.0000309383,0.0004707039,0.0010693849,0.0006248789,0.00044766266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22935839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5642764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.334918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017670589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026270308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092071758","doi":"10.7202/1071747ar","title":"A Tale of Two Metaphors: A Narrative Take on the Canadian Constitution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Narrative; Metaphor; Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07055643361135451,"score_gpt":0.3173559824964412,"score_spread":0.2467995488850867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092071758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06952176,0.00018851344,0.000006254421,0.10546995,0.00042537248,0.0003857414,0.00008189742,0.00002630734,0.8238942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99801296,0.00002448394,0.000099358345,0.0015800481,0.00022199553,0.0000047262956,5.789941e-7,0.0000028772843,0.000052987107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988255,0.00027801792,0.00017600371,0.00009594602,0.0003842827,0.0002402797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999239,0.00010092693,0.0001339703,0.000043753087,0.00021149246,0.00027085858],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046880514,0.000083275685,0.00015032633,0.000014841471,0.008960365,0.00006709289,0.00019701403,0.000042654636,0.0004055766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049614505,0.00004913126,0.000100763995,0.00018527317,0.000777985,0.00014652952,0.000017674369,0.00028699514,0.000032785847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000125365,0.000013615747,0.00016179091,0.0000021298245,0.00009952283,0.00001881386,0.05012746,0.000057840283,0.00010584737,0.94715315,0.0018308559,0.00041644185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033418604,0.00009468627,0.0002569144,0.000035040608,0.000035853773,0.0000058045052,0.046034202,0.000021546124,0.00082929083,0.0009894143,0.9512334,0.00012969351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5545964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9474967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9494025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030761617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007113613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99232984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092965598","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197516744.013.5","title":"E Pluribus Plures","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Aotearoa; Legal pluralism; Colonialism; Indigenous rights; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Normative; Corporate governance; State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Political economy; Environmental ethics; Comparative law; Human rights; Politics; Legal realism; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04158811126374558,"score_gpt":0.24524430532230695,"score_spread":0.2036561940585614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092965598","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000022644062,0.00019802964,0.000017804728,0.00091955904,0.00027638447,0.0004903052,0.000110103545,0.0003017636,0.9976634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015858981,0.0010883819,0.00017576358,0.00014976396,0.0004737307,8.971928e-7,0.000017438724,0.000029440069,0.9964787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838114,0.00006833904,0.00015339201,0.00046457548,0.00056229264,0.00037026644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902594,0.00010599702,0.00020626435,0.00020489725,0.000178233,0.00027865614],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009436488,0.0003349654,0.00042793047,0.000047997568,0.0012055498,0.00008467377,0.00069659826,0.0004825747,0.00016929576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047668596,0.00035129528,0.0002882939,0.000010998958,0.0007881367,0.00011980745,0.00047175758,0.00049582735,0.00001204846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039928884,0.0000040868804,0.000004035951,0.000029364046,0.00019093021,0.00010901224,0.0072062816,0.0000013659128,0.0000024707422,0.974041,0.016215052,0.0021564725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025810034,0.000027808876,0.000011943236,0.000062612184,0.00015956545,3.5993756e-7,0.0011420137,0.0000021881335,0.000008432158,0.0008580465,0.9970517,0.0004172101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010753198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9808367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045407275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013359169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093336479","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197516744.013.7","title":"Legal Pluralism and Indigenous Legal Traditions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Indigenous; Political science; Absoluteness; Environmental ethics; Pluralism (philosophy); Legal profession; Legal realism; Law; Legal research; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Ecology","score_opus":0.03797286410008306,"score_gpt":0.23912421213214977,"score_spread":0.2011513480320667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093336479","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000991247,0.00018273195,0.000010309618,0.0009720782,0.00022325882,0.0005943428,0.0002937975,0.00021598511,0.9965162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013666806,0.0013705671,0.00014960271,0.0001623152,0.00042138202,0.0000016345241,0.00003620581,0.000028353052,0.9841631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985071,0.000070424525,0.0001610945,0.00045073355,0.00044551774,0.00036517088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914885,0.0000894503,0.0001753646,0.00015383832,0.000118909724,0.00031357052],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000083195286,0.00032681326,0.00041112455,0.000063324835,0.0019769298,0.00017766793,0.000423604,0.00040787822,0.000058067828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017511175,0.00035130008,0.00020200049,0.000013334544,0.0010077268,0.00028437856,0.000198428,0.000553698,0.0000030712413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025997735,0.0000062378476,0.0000038989324,0.00002235824,0.00017805632,0.00019177527,0.023028912,5.9322e-7,0.0000034371126,0.97172415,0.0032747053,0.0015398666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029865405,0.000045697292,0.000043989265,0.00004655241,0.00019904746,0.0000034131817,0.002395046,0.0000015682144,0.000004538541,0.00043309954,0.99611354,0.00041488418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008040783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027869206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9928388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037924768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015578177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095557111","doi":"","title":"Judicial Reasoning Across Legal Orders: Lessons from Nunavut","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Political science; Deference; Normative; Sociology","score_opus":0.029584218599484388,"score_gpt":0.33985298848898554,"score_spread":0.31026876988950114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095557111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8812529,0.0053696306,0.0013874279,0.104030505,0.0006585683,0.00024585568,0.00002299688,0.00020361869,0.006828518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911381,0.0035540399,0.00019134967,0.00081253547,0.0036268616,0.0000059437803,0.000004611477,0.000023241639,0.00064334064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951971,0.00028722908,0.00031340707,0.0003317405,0.0007034879,0.0031670076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909836,0.00012458368,0.00021887467,0.00008573287,0.00017387034,0.0002985504],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012801329,0.00021166001,0.0003216171,0.000015934877,0.002933849,0.00036535723,0.0005634611,0.00015471903,0.00015377939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010874697,0.0001834109,0.00020965136,0.00034865408,0.00033490206,0.0005734867,0.000117753625,0.0022972529,0.00014249489],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029529314,0.0001436554,0.01745181,0.000007666575,0.0012076257,0.00006297827,0.20691986,0.0000983249,0.0009951615,0.7026928,0.0055057583,0.064619064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00257371,0.0004431429,0.008273667,0.00009077897,0.00019118252,0.000032075408,0.519459,0.00015819086,0.00013626205,0.07959241,0.38792214,0.001127419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027551292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10583834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6231004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015249742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018780918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097946713","doi":"10.1130/abs/2020am-357323","title":"IAPETUS SHRUGGED: THE EARLY RIFTING RECORD OF LAURENTIA IN THE NEW ENGLAND AND QUÉBEC APPALACHIANS","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Laurentia; Rift; Geology; Paleontology; Astronomy; Physics; Paleozoic","score_opus":0.029127508267977834,"score_gpt":0.26761388078771314,"score_spread":0.2384863725197353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097946713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9375494,0.0006318359,0.000045220317,0.05935614,0.000019918649,0.00065957615,0.000001786105,0.00004964558,0.0016864912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933154,0.00025041486,0.0050897053,0.0010989036,0.0001534817,0.000026471233,0.0000026238645,0.000006259695,0.00005672756],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982561,0.00024366131,0.0003567111,0.00027047546,0.0004653643,0.0004077038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865305,0.0006647199,0.00036312928,0.00011072365,0.00008400535,0.00012436775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005510946,0.00016976932,0.0003464657,0.0000045414295,0.0004717669,0.00006126504,0.0004130242,0.00012004834,0.00004660715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032970792,0.00007888746,0.00014369976,0.00043571243,0.0023237583,0.000110651774,0.000095573036,0.0004645386,0.0000034887569],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008727631,0.00019992921,0.34835562,0.000048396563,0.00014990837,0.0000042530332,0.41736487,0.00005127366,0.00004658222,0.00010862961,0.001366547,0.2322167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010710943,0.001412346,0.60402286,0.000057225316,0.00009363422,0.000001663275,0.12562081,0.000057692632,0.000016057638,0.00015768243,0.26720688,0.00028206094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21277033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019914094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29174405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024739842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010021103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3098060769","doi":"10.71781/2025","title":"Le projet d’un tribunal unifié de la famille au Québec ou l’impasse d’une voie d’accès à la justice","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Physics; Tribunal; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.008553796887687669,"score_gpt":0.22037029977865064,"score_spread":0.21181650289096296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3098060769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71580017,0.010827598,0.00009615591,0.0040401365,0.0016677751,0.0007795103,0.00011540632,0.00017450117,0.26649877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89529955,0.0015317955,0.0005398834,0.000120358585,0.0005043719,0.000059743565,0.00022743696,0.000046659883,0.101670206],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949073,0.0012722074,0.00060449366,0.00091423624,0.0012547136,0.0010470496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661195,0.0011044389,0.00073939835,0.00037048486,0.00060572836,0.00056798046],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008785383,0.0007468845,0.00078151055,0.00018701781,0.023345022,0.00019649572,0.00093500374,0.0011906086,0.000056886507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004933637,0.0008024571,0.0006252658,0.0008116183,0.0018467875,0.0008067337,0.00030080669,0.0010789667,0.00019939487],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010467964,0.0009854382,0.055032272,0.0007094933,0.0015173273,0.0022223466,0.5873587,0.0031400397,0.004690037,0.3323425,0.0018777406,0.009077311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017799198,0.00011639903,0.14557551,0.00032291713,0.0012744523,0.00022735714,0.45412964,0.0007251534,0.0007696781,0.00021702886,0.39384907,0.0010128769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.924394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52111274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40328124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022778122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015557494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3100860369","doi":"","title":"Chagnon v. Syndicat de la fonction publique et parapublique du Québec: Implications of the Supreme Court of Canada’s Decision for the Law of Parliamentary Privilege","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Privilege (computing)","score_opus":0.027243929199189033,"score_gpt":0.2941517510665078,"score_spread":0.26690782186731876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3100860369","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046872586,0.052314397,0.00020268788,0.8916046,0.00027226645,0.004515254,0.0009731273,0.0000209656,0.0032241293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9547924,0.020730337,0.00020809732,0.023872074,0.00007552648,0.00026177976,0.000023218183,0.000013427015,0.000023149534],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981627,0.00046271706,0.0005181589,0.00020576388,0.00033200986,0.00031868985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977987,0.0010097616,0.00038816378,0.00027139336,0.00022619938,0.00030577526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011580004,0.00014863766,0.00038556207,0.000018492836,0.0005550485,0.000020857105,0.00067277,0.000069597685,0.0002014285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068841944,0.00009574719,0.00020168803,0.00031745812,0.0006122354,0.00017288374,0.00006443594,0.00015805797,6.1694885e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000323497,0.00009302681,0.06819538,0.0013269241,0.00046407725,0.000001770812,0.008466245,0.00004253602,0.00019422501,0.04936315,0.85666776,0.0151525475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020181928,0.000044877015,0.036196467,0.00067305664,0.00018464049,0.0000018083878,0.0031105096,0.000015798389,0.0001982128,0.00021618293,0.9590231,0.00013352593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9972712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9079198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011358873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069518285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99867785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108883279","doi":"10.5204/thesis.eprints.206179","title":"Gladue, Bugmy and ‘special treatment': Reconciling a proposal for sentencing law reform in Queensland with s.10 of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Queensland University of Technology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Statutory law; Law; Legislature; Political science; State (computer science); High Court; Law reform; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.015391589506519402,"score_gpt":0.2593765323218664,"score_spread":0.24398494281534702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108883279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9780933,0.00013471988,0.000006783708,0.003580392,0.00015140686,0.0010247771,0.000058263853,0.00004300202,0.016907355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99496776,0.00029407625,0.0008762217,0.0000056478925,0.0001315271,0.0000044081394,0.00007808503,0.000011184682,0.0036310826],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908733,0.000061755134,0.00017866466,0.0002751967,0.0001897784,0.00020726662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992404,0.000061412866,0.0003554977,0.00009558849,0.00021649289,0.000030582636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011846665,0.00017165503,0.00043540777,0.00010866646,0.0005229636,0.000010535647,0.00021709128,0.00038789544,0.000012255886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009610832,0.00012150073,0.000092577415,0.000265802,0.0005874204,0.00011777101,0.00004533784,0.0001825684,5.02978e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0076133963,0.00049251044,0.10848838,0.0014613771,0.0011504114,0.00006864244,0.53762263,0.000009542186,0.0012434183,0.26171315,0.0004244603,0.0797121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008446259,0.0020316893,0.052690376,0.0012613941,0.0010387639,0.000005051425,0.81826943,0.00009985572,0.004212914,0.0068371887,0.10407613,0.001030953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03466374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6737398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63907605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042834567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027052697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9717645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110958855","doi":"10.18572/1812-3767-2020-11-67-72","title":"Interpretation of Equality of Rights in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Practice of the Canadian Supreme Court","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional and municipal law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Human rights; Fundamental rights; Political science; Dignity; International human rights law; Linguistic rights; Bill of rights; Politics; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.03292663684936916,"score_gpt":0.2989053444139983,"score_spread":0.26597870756462916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110958855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8299865,0.001140805,0.0000043464624,0.0406086,0.00011751669,0.0006912912,0.00023697817,0.000002616207,0.12721133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994341,0.000020335621,0.000024230781,0.00048132456,0.000020655443,0.000004782033,0.0000024252445,5.463536e-7,0.0000115636185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990629,0.00033253257,0.00020047493,0.000080872254,0.00021811186,0.00010512031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991097,0.0004554871,0.00012356989,0.000065652195,0.00016811558,0.00007748699],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006807406,0.00005629096,0.00015618162,0.000013583892,0.0006486064,0.000016216998,0.00015108997,0.00005023923,0.00001115975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031212924,0.000026660415,0.000029163311,0.00009778021,0.00853854,0.00012288039,0.000034072462,0.000101618105,1.6047854e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028919127,0.0000070659194,0.0013937869,0.000012194584,0.000028576824,3.995804e-7,0.061679397,0.0000075031944,0.000013027261,0.9367735,0.00003967169,0.00001598374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0061980225,0.00027819528,0.16125888,0.00070216134,0.0007124829,0.000020725907,0.07594608,0.0031708123,0.0005780192,0.121073775,0.6293838,0.00067705143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99784434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8156997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043451724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024803297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99415964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111094914","doi":"10.3138/tjt-2020-0088","title":"Interesting Times, Indeed: Reflections on the Last Decade at the Toronto School of Theology","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Theology; Sociology; Energy (signal processing); Commodification; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.06049127111923068,"score_gpt":0.3615885889714969,"score_spread":0.30109731785226623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111094914","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38605437,0.010763431,0.00017940489,0.10756087,0.0017040534,0.0005839803,0.0000087431845,0.000056104644,0.49308902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994158,0.00062976213,0.00016675776,0.0021229547,0.0009449295,0.00000667109,3.1947638e-7,0.000010464212,0.0019601367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974208,0.0012624891,0.00048811772,0.00015332339,0.0003356885,0.0003395952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722004,0.0015566029,0.0006319185,0.00015857964,0.00028222107,0.00015062247],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012628477,0.00015279764,0.0003621411,0.000010300951,0.000904673,0.000023995342,0.000814954,0.0001473338,0.007176974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035850506,0.00007538249,0.00020228997,0.0000772947,0.001040606,0.00023556549,0.00026850373,0.00039409654,0.00005483056],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014401341,0.00023224331,0.015720086,0.000025848989,0.0015286951,0.000029733013,0.32623455,0.00033889766,0.007486874,0.5236683,0.11727785,0.0060168146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028049715,0.0044870633,0.07149616,0.00024956078,0.00064062024,0.00018612489,0.38137797,0.00008559632,0.0023777294,0.02650423,0.5088941,0.0008958968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013095607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15068457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60810363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084566843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000121231904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111302684","doi":"10.7202/1074026ar","title":"Jonathan Crowe, \"Natural Law and the Nature of Law.\"","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural law; Philosophy; Law; Natural (archaeology); Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.056749497704937965,"score_gpt":0.34822185029109004,"score_spread":0.29147235258615206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111302684","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016285245,0.55655545,1.1784742e-7,0.27838495,0.00012496691,0.0007322009,0.0000063037073,0.000025760928,0.16254169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89477533,0.07653607,0.00004770185,0.028342463,0.00025087068,0.00002419129,0.0000013669355,0.000004767626,0.000017240951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876255,0.00033014346,0.0002576255,0.00017752149,0.00030743293,0.00016471665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994099,0.00023223227,0.00011544535,0.00009682601,0.00008223796,0.000063320804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051225425,0.000114629736,0.00041957892,0.000005162001,0.0002709173,0.000022177454,0.00028148972,0.000073631665,0.000037642614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005582733,0.000064120955,0.00011997577,0.00023792399,0.001143164,0.00013703501,0.000105450956,0.0003931169,0.000011661177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010568841,0.00000835768,0.00009107387,0.0006579786,0.000018307848,0.00000185749,0.0053284355,8.863815e-8,0.0000044685717,0.99287856,0.00046705408,0.00053326995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011916999,0.00003741414,0.0009741809,0.002697622,0.00013114783,0.0000012896882,0.0006445153,0.000007766768,0.000024492898,0.08879679,0.90514565,0.00034745949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012567834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074910093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9046786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026168185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012421253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42120352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112291549","doi":"10.23865/arctic.v11.2431","title":"Sámi Law: A Methodological Approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arctic review on law and politics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Premise; Scope (computer science); Political science; Comparative law; Economic Justice; Commercial law; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2585948405630685,"score_gpt":0.4215881804262709,"score_spread":0.1629933398632024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112291549","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002294398,0.049859796,0.0000880026,0.13017675,0.00017012082,0.0010139208,0.000015348813,0.00014572358,0.81623596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74991095,0.05325748,0.0062991944,0.18909456,0.0007784318,0.00004563435,0.00000618222,0.000011414228,0.00059615995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820423,0.0007509875,0.00021495587,0.00023113123,0.00026536238,0.0003333442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891883,0.0005723421,0.000063158855,0.000097015225,0.00006817836,0.0002804937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006863635,0.00012921085,0.00038431495,0.0000031532288,0.00064321194,0.00004745727,0.00014728997,0.000068813366,0.000085846616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012052732,0.00008336955,0.000103684804,0.00010308933,0.00067495584,0.00006911456,0.000066847926,0.000186752,0.000067311164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012466845,0.0000226922,0.000047485933,0.00052957825,0.000018732737,0.0000017895696,0.0024959687,1.3791629e-7,0.0000011098077,0.9949881,0.0014101887,0.00048297163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009120478,0.00006711338,0.00018065973,0.00018834812,0.00006755405,0.0000014637891,0.00059865374,0.0000047708595,0.000003613887,0.008074766,0.9905863,0.0001355698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032110782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053276024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9891761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046147532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017864399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49471313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115883702","doi":"10.3389/fhumd.2020.609694","title":"(In)Essential Bordering: Canada, COVID, and Mobility","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Human Dynamics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation; Australian Government; Government of Canada; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Subsidy; Political science; Politics; Closure (psychology); Norm (philosophy); Pandemic; Political economy; Development economics; Economic growth; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.01459642383533884,"score_gpt":0.27929791821798033,"score_spread":0.2647014943826415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115883702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98438525,0.00034547635,0.00054089696,0.011363033,0.00061928097,0.0003599731,0.000027269934,0.000035023044,0.0023238228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984516,0.000084003055,0.0006114973,0.00045423402,0.00011148654,0.000012637882,0.000008078205,0.0000069111843,0.00025958352],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988819,0.000097528246,0.00019951363,0.00026506122,0.00024711044,0.00030891594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996724,0.000031785246,0.000048957663,0.0000681639,0.000028545937,0.0001501573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018782428,0.000107653395,0.00022100056,0.00002262099,0.00038161385,0.00004327337,0.00018726144,0.000076342585,0.0000310351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024459508,0.00011245322,0.000024421097,0.00019703343,0.00035029385,0.00013776154,0.000087978755,0.00019810931,3.6333805e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027678934,0.000056436766,0.915718,0.000085908265,0.00003145562,0.000054357162,0.051565163,0.00053981267,0.000013867337,0.009115372,0.021989921,0.00080203515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00248613,0.000091778136,0.61286247,0.000052236064,0.000046159923,5.5146853e-7,0.1606992,0.05687948,0.000013939333,0.0072130207,0.15832396,0.0013310588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8065024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9814686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30285552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011196171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017626803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45857093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3116128873","doi":"10.7202/1072698ar","title":"\"The Ethical Teacher\" (Elizabeth Campbell)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.057990758295886395,"score_gpt":0.33842543024672667,"score_spread":0.28043467195084026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3116128873","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1091414,0.0027893835,0.00016246035,0.79834855,0.0005682663,0.0006002785,0.00000670638,0.00050965644,0.08787332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98875713,0.0007900238,0.0004367641,0.0060163634,0.000997359,0.000032709475,0.0000012855186,0.000011953127,0.0029563915],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981961,0.00048527058,0.00017822463,0.00022008162,0.0005178449,0.00040243022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988776,0.00062095857,0.00006193288,0.00010573696,0.00010587986,0.00022788782],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008962933,0.00011006608,0.00015344846,0.0000055505266,0.002255777,0.00012977576,0.0003807805,0.00019324565,0.0002815577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004161214,0.00006991363,0.000112141344,0.0002687013,0.0005721031,0.00007145818,0.00012652886,0.000526249,0.00046980396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051404655,0.00005926787,0.02866285,0.000034736004,0.00024458222,0.000016147189,0.38654262,0.00001618301,0.0005765382,0.05498123,0.445975,0.08283942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010624622,0.00001883567,0.0037015227,0.000004897002,0.000021072667,8.859566e-8,0.020546554,0.00007311832,0.000041580755,0.0004988728,0.97484815,0.00013906047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048714965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002295052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8796157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110739515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056907335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120503199","doi":"","title":"The Story of Law Reform in Nova Scotia: A Perilous Enterprise","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Law; Law reform; Political science; Legal history; Nova (rocket); History; Engineering; Archaeology; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.027843084213617003,"score_gpt":0.3111120622201974,"score_spread":0.28326897800658035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120503199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6301692,0.0013114421,9.556485e-7,0.0073359916,0.00093108,0.00040359324,0.000009995884,0.000047310798,0.35979044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957497,0.00018694134,0.000106260595,0.00024755657,0.0002953318,0.000015398879,8.277721e-7,0.000011060106,0.0033869264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829936,0.00023834828,0.00026743245,0.00024117126,0.00049074634,0.0004629442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988072,0.00016230397,0.0002465472,0.00050813786,0.00013889009,0.00013692395],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012563976,0.00014900717,0.000265207,0.000013556774,0.0034030504,0.00025690743,0.00092459115,0.00011972036,0.00013084532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000745044,0.000098205885,0.00012448187,0.00006310097,0.0020017892,0.00051197864,0.0002635664,0.0004322088,0.00019222077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015376185,0.00020832822,0.048435606,0.000058516718,0.00014799317,0.00003568807,0.06610564,0.000005393701,0.0006019647,0.87652165,0.0027051722,0.0050202836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001167287,0.00009757539,0.14722477,0.00020089126,0.000031813208,0.0000012004092,0.024614101,0.00000588572,0.00046840592,0.002313085,0.8234207,0.00045427034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36362922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7027184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87420857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006135783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007589882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121131019","doi":"","title":"Kahkewistahaw First Nation v. Taypotat: An Arbitrary Approach to Discrimination","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unanimity; Constitutionality; Arbitrariness; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Notice; Disadvantage; Context (archaeology); Prejudice (legal term); Charter; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.11209152580254468,"score_gpt":0.32970343146166536,"score_spread":0.2176119056591207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121131019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017661031,0.037787307,0.02782855,0.22390972,0.0024369524,0.010098814,0.0039532003,0.0010445963,0.67527986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884172,0.0064410376,0.0007409152,0.0026373519,0.00038105578,0.0003097964,0.0001002793,0.000012243739,0.00096009043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99650514,0.0006136639,0.0005441855,0.0006000568,0.0011710551,0.0005659233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99702835,0.00060415454,0.0002239466,0.0003905255,0.0014262385,0.00032676014],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014057647,0.00034751516,0.00044117117,0.00004200064,0.0025705295,0.00012896174,0.0007728048,0.00012027266,0.00033983067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016993872,0.00020031854,0.00017559613,0.00033550063,0.0044546444,0.001417735,0.00018162464,0.00021470642,0.00020900718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026966944,0.00012130254,0.00006698067,0.00012318158,0.00003577349,0.000008090602,0.0027227746,0.000007722309,0.00004712742,0.9868886,0.008249413,0.0017020599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045178604,0.00015380693,0.0013766721,0.0017329641,0.00020376852,0.000066017376,0.0044316985,0.000036277168,0.00005358486,0.009678433,0.9810308,0.0007841825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010064746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014253385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97721016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003920424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048684783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121192050","doi":"","title":"Judging the Limits of Cooperative Federalism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Adjudication; Appeal; Metaphor; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Law; Separation of powers; Commerce Clause; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Context (archaeology); Judicial review; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09536380529066056,"score_gpt":0.3499702702630056,"score_spread":0.254606464972345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121192050","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031537585,0.12747765,0.0033570435,0.50976324,0.0025088424,0.0071124258,0.0029744254,0.0004379681,0.31483084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740506,0.021591123,0.00005102361,0.0026745182,0.0002576592,0.00010001499,0.000009273567,0.000006754053,0.0012590738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968243,0.00090542616,0.0005438902,0.0003450059,0.00090819085,0.00047317013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99550873,0.001792863,0.00030347877,0.00033988975,0.0019259985,0.00012901903],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014817353,0.00028291758,0.000495986,0.00001542068,0.0028047047,0.00009620814,0.00079569186,0.000086965905,0.00071415625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024359154,0.00012270606,0.00021992993,0.00024523246,0.012187478,0.00056051946,0.00018992592,0.00023634345,0.00011594504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017929464,0.000029433084,0.00012611302,0.00005802608,0.00007712378,0.00000816414,0.0020648744,0.0000045447964,0.00018222221,0.98745894,0.008950833,0.0010217796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046904932,0.00010010024,0.00055487535,0.0029219582,0.00023056564,0.000054298136,0.004902379,0.000007798943,0.00039902487,0.004210272,0.9856543,0.00049540587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073531866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077401022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9832487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016116294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068075745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121224161","doi":"","title":"Context and Inclusivity in Canada's Evolving Definition of the Family","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Charter; Commission; Context (archaeology); Legislature; Inclusion (mineral); Interdependence; Political science; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.04251854708595245,"score_gpt":0.25591828164135877,"score_spread":0.2133997345554063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121224161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8996212,0.0007044559,7.4360486e-7,0.003997011,0.000067394154,0.00010446925,0.000002296066,0.0000051496027,0.09549728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99921614,0.00014712341,0.00004751571,0.00034811074,0.000013929918,0.0000029084765,6.975505e-8,0.0000011646325,0.00022302801],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944186,0.00009123867,0.000090326466,0.00006432563,0.00019894369,0.000113312046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997134,0.0001428632,0.000036660043,0.00003738434,0.00004629639,0.000023382858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013619075,0.000037573438,0.00007869741,0.000005741324,0.0003282875,0.000009823639,0.00007463238,0.000021160091,0.00010331072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003075595,0.000023309332,0.000013889783,0.000110535526,0.00014708273,0.00006995773,0.000072290015,0.000053376687,0.0000011814412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002704673,0.00003844353,0.86512727,0.000017736225,0.000017386958,0.000001925513,0.0722713,0.0000030257868,0.00044830533,0.03409764,0.011006841,0.016967395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013825508,0.000003355674,0.9532284,0.000017828454,0.0000032675425,7.7137905e-8,0.042097166,0.00008567985,0.000037093596,0.0005295392,0.0037994327,0.00005991484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99916935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09959494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034060504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006736209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25249553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121300722","doi":"","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL AND COMMON LAW DIALOGUES BETWEEN THE SUPREME COURT AND CANADIAN LEGISLATURE","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Legislature; Political science; Statutory interpretation; Common law; Constitution; Separation of powers; Sociology","score_opus":0.0629178601273308,"score_gpt":0.3049347126187453,"score_spread":0.24201685249141447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121300722","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010227826,0.22339803,3.1459388e-7,0.62085176,0.00019063009,0.00122759,0.0002140219,0.000026312327,0.14386351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9284407,0.058717493,0.000008995065,0.012008035,0.00032015555,0.000019793895,0.000020237587,0.000004196282,0.0004604238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876666,0.0003057374,0.00014628949,0.00014966325,0.0002009281,0.0004307053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989689,0.00020357032,0.00004384549,0.00014726276,0.00007660873,0.00055979297],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009042087,0.0001299567,0.00024936226,0.000012343403,0.003814529,0.00014350784,0.00027608286,0.000083598345,0.0001478259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017882296,0.00007002367,0.000044236836,0.00015370114,0.0030089181,0.00011211,0.00002912122,0.00024232018,0.00003838795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.1718986e-7,0.0000017644296,0.05565234,0.00007828718,0.00008577967,0.000021227133,0.0054111485,2.593829e-7,2.2505203e-7,0.87718666,0.05104803,0.01051345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045644294,0.0000042179313,0.038446277,0.00020820253,0.000070730384,0.0000075702724,0.00028757358,3.7695256e-7,7.7950716e-8,0.0010581248,0.9597644,0.000106779386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98963803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91821283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038253295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049713766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121301256","doi":"","title":"Judicial Audiences: A Case Study of Justice David Watt's Literary Judgments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Harm; Political science; Law; Appeal; Arbitrariness; Empathy; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; History","score_opus":0.023101691563452702,"score_gpt":0.32377025546612853,"score_spread":0.3006685639026758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121301256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920006,0.0019429192,0.000017738425,0.0005786814,0.0007665831,0.00055609585,0.000002147445,0.000031773438,0.004103479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957899,0.0012342314,0.000035794394,0.000072557625,0.0006001951,0.000009922492,5.895395e-7,0.000012392203,0.0022444103],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960828,0.00042106077,0.00044686173,0.000273377,0.00081797485,0.001957952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897766,0.00016418629,0.00033637465,0.00014516522,0.00024493912,0.00013166356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022640084,0.00018390303,0.00034572798,0.00007677622,0.0012925921,0.00009192799,0.0003602313,0.0000881789,0.000117089025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020930679,0.00014205687,0.00012596372,0.00038921685,0.00017947667,0.00052174745,0.00010586873,0.0011594614,0.000057239857],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029091613,0.0024363461,0.11926549,0.00008175055,0.0017324975,0.0011746561,0.78988075,0.00009646566,0.0003637346,0.04530541,0.00063560595,0.03873637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022677118,0.001865528,0.002421352,0.00006212141,0.00039596914,0.0009348539,0.9712734,0.000022044189,0.000010974318,0.01581233,0.0045297937,0.00040391966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011990408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03135049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18139264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011395159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010394228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99458885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121308364","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1034","title":"Breaking the Law's Grip On Equality: A New Paradigm For Section 15","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unanimity; Interpretation (philosophy); Section (typography); Law; Supreme court; Tacking; Political science; Trilogy; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.10673640855730362,"score_gpt":0.3740450030483598,"score_spread":0.26730859449105615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121308364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015179646,0.23529622,0.00095571805,0.18294448,0.003930524,0.008816904,0.000039051236,0.00050968886,0.56598943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8443415,0.0859958,0.0011707365,0.05286167,0.0038211758,0.0008331543,0.000025862366,0.00008282317,0.010867255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978391,0.0006246849,0.00032948417,0.00029563112,0.00047662217,0.00043446536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890727,0.0004371069,0.00016438084,0.00025018922,0.00011906453,0.00012198898],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020556583,0.00018600312,0.0003747272,0.0000066172684,0.0017285292,0.000121040306,0.00026939085,0.00008826727,0.00026249012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006743294,0.00011602571,0.0002609584,0.00022359374,0.0002685042,0.00020397897,0.000027024074,0.00017996388,0.000081878025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042997735,0.000021729153,0.000026101634,0.00027280356,0.000044442007,4.0079962e-7,0.0020297058,0.000001941398,0.000004766176,0.9651103,0.029461874,0.0030216568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017184163,0.000035405807,0.0000542977,0.00079436105,0.00010385034,0.0000012056964,0.00035009976,0.0000012806441,0.000016995584,0.007029419,0.9912659,0.00017532251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016182685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02263073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96180403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023262072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000082550956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121313813","doi":"","title":"Willis, ‘Theology,’ and the Rule of Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Law; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Constitutional law; Political science; Democracy; Legal realism; Separation of powers; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.0213215182514069,"score_gpt":0.25599865110096276,"score_spread":0.23467713284955585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121313813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07819234,0.00002138133,0.000015896305,0.007188152,0.00007414914,0.00042672077,0.000009192873,0.00007178394,0.9140004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9351954,0.06371134,0.00046493032,0.00026541436,0.00012811049,0.0000015853566,0.0000012653175,0.000005605774,0.00022637087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897105,0.00029096118,0.00010597863,0.00018421459,0.00019420918,0.00025361785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934506,0.0002715796,0.00009699293,0.00012765572,0.000111080764,0.00004759866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034037133,0.00010864589,0.00020699268,0.00049760385,0.0007659763,0.000025164456,0.00030380115,0.000090672125,0.00004032185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012468908,0.0000764126,0.00008611737,0.0014231865,0.0020763893,0.0003165378,0.00017726915,0.00013044018,0.0000105042245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013069382,0.00007047971,0.0008341038,0.000014204249,0.000117657924,0.0000065005997,0.19609964,0.000006482544,0.0000048299944,0.7929504,0.00023882788,0.009526204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096944533,0.000018158142,0.00027463154,0.000009463879,0.000053678697,6.5203136e-7,0.005597912,0.000016158845,0.00006697114,0.00002029474,0.99286854,0.000104120176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3549762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13864775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9926297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013022314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000082765815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87706965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121353673","doi":"","title":"Producing Paternity: The Role of Legal Fatherhood in Maintaining the Traditional Family","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Jurisprudence; Law; Openness to experience; Legislature; Sociology; Legal history; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03334374926196655,"score_gpt":0.24689127943848624,"score_spread":0.21354753017651967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121353673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.645399,0.000010299838,0.000015021297,0.003391364,0.000073093746,0.0005636579,0.000011380498,0.00005664118,0.35047957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946255,0.0049233087,0.00008896947,0.00016039018,0.00015601542,0.0000026768957,0.0000028342215,0.0000056960334,0.00003461173],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984292,0.00042347115,0.00015393298,0.00024582702,0.0003952957,0.00035226796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936885,0.00020210011,0.0001205008,0.00016905558,0.00010394721,0.000035542955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006123209,0.00013707658,0.00017318678,0.00072347827,0.00085479923,0.000060603932,0.0005367846,0.00006844469,0.000013528208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016700014,0.0000890009,0.0001089072,0.003080758,0.00033357384,0.00037993953,0.00007602625,0.00029108545,0.000004232476],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015368337,0.00037394627,0.013032157,0.0000117822765,0.00014128655,0.000062996856,0.7688289,0.00017311753,0.00020547675,0.13505396,0.00013861827,0.081824064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000424868,0.00008950918,0.042088825,0.00004386874,0.00003808221,0.000001311727,0.13210917,0.00006594129,0.00015790769,0.000091265196,0.824704,0.00018526101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25530326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058701545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82456535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032923374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026086302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9584747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121420720","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1160","title":"Ignoring the Golden Principle of Charter Interpretation?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Certiorari; Political science; Judicial interpretation; Sociology; Original jurisdiction; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05787098581992551,"score_gpt":0.348874749366013,"score_spread":0.2910037635460875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121420720","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21543518,0.3959264,0.00018332867,0.06754162,0.0017369189,0.0061103986,0.00003604942,0.00039390876,0.31263623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94663316,0.050860275,0.00013085731,0.0010853169,0.00016025476,0.00006460934,0.0000021646667,0.0000062829035,0.0010570709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986571,0.00023751089,0.00031024468,0.00015145978,0.00042143202,0.00022226971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992381,0.0001428705,0.0001436285,0.00020153083,0.00021965255,0.000054246124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006714153,0.00010509414,0.0002916293,0.0000065478944,0.0006928848,0.000015749736,0.0003534463,0.000035673074,0.00032423533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030228533,0.00006320723,0.00015286436,0.000169016,0.0005391979,0.0001946578,0.000084290696,0.000110629226,0.000103674894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026657615,0.00025653362,0.02151189,0.004283044,0.0005977659,0.000022374534,0.14760606,0.000013538821,0.00035275685,0.7535494,0.048752483,0.02302752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070911556,0.000013144702,0.0026757838,0.0009226462,0.000049468632,0.0000017253257,0.00038769603,0.00000615707,0.000040003513,0.00013036127,0.995595,0.00010713938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018406368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011907167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9468425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007996559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004245923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.532918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121432486","doi":"","title":"When Disciplines Collide: Polygamy and the Social Sciences on Trial","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Deference; Law; Legislator; Adversarial system; Law and economics; Sociology; Legislation","score_opus":0.0591703081088708,"score_gpt":0.36972988721145095,"score_spread":0.31055957910258014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121432486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83650064,0.0039646532,0.000048061174,0.1386202,0.0009985045,0.0006421053,0.0000021613246,0.00005071821,0.019172926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913635,0.0013546941,0.000030636507,0.00026236798,0.0028220608,0.000016198725,2.790336e-7,0.0000069617345,0.00414326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966007,0.0005901026,0.00023004504,0.00018609583,0.000840121,0.0015529532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992437,0.00029437433,0.00018050315,0.0000494976,0.0001333738,0.0000985818],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007399615,0.0001360955,0.00023271446,0.00003882374,0.0048343153,0.000358521,0.00042534762,0.00007690137,0.000013241028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009764165,0.0000717455,0.000112253016,0.0002350424,0.0020211276,0.00026819602,0.00008464582,0.0008500557,0.000016050122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032874837,0.000049681643,0.0005806263,9.3117444e-7,0.00010752537,9.20031e-7,0.059210014,0.0000049716186,0.000003078509,0.92753386,0.003548432,0.005672483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.030693384,0.0007796442,0.0005861655,0.00001417537,0.00008347875,0.000016202084,0.28603315,0.000021671372,0.0000046746836,0.6466896,0.03477903,0.0002988223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023651123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011297946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28084424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008508352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018921478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121472864","doi":"","title":"Insite: Site and Sight (Part 1 - Insights on Insite)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Citizenship; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.03799854464079478,"score_gpt":0.27037443164962316,"score_spread":0.23237588700882839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121472864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7670609,0.0010717113,0.000002498535,0.0007558353,0.00048352857,0.0003412501,0.000009074646,0.00019304031,0.2300822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910216,0.00049535313,0.00040614323,0.0017267165,0.0006266823,0.00003330989,0.000007381654,0.00002091191,0.0056619123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788123,0.0003367262,0.00028153945,0.00047102149,0.0005272553,0.000502246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889505,0.00017008214,0.00011916565,0.00025901225,0.00014720534,0.00040951275],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003458647,0.0002607089,0.0003198384,0.000048028363,0.0018417133,0.00016191395,0.00026006426,0.00021077617,0.00075770955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033835758,0.00020538307,0.00009310938,0.00029090984,0.0006872664,0.00063158356,0.0001587718,0.00041363385,0.00121631],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021979432,0.0005523625,0.054448202,0.00006885812,0.00028905837,0.0001469824,0.29642227,0.0000039195515,0.0018712708,0.6146206,0.027305946,0.004050738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005646287,0.0001398024,0.04941096,0.00007420385,0.00003947262,0.000001196922,0.0040518483,0.0000035481655,0.0010887955,0.0024681238,0.9416669,0.00049050973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02225556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035322726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91436094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016879746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044319877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121498883","doi":"","title":"Reflecting Culture: Polygamy and the Charter","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Charter; Politics; Sociology; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Dignity; Constitutionality","score_opus":0.08995414543215899,"score_gpt":0.3667065384014886,"score_spread":0.27675239296932963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121498883","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008159764,0.47045696,0.0005005308,0.12337225,0.0021298626,0.004393642,0.0004648545,0.00035549531,0.39016664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649035,0.027519668,0.000093273884,0.005388996,0.00077999395,0.0001290281,0.000014599631,0.000007072798,0.0011638802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692184,0.0009323379,0.00042758274,0.00029759915,0.00075958704,0.00066103146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773735,0.0008718233,0.00022640279,0.00027558405,0.00067428645,0.00021452756],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025350433,0.00029759583,0.00046833497,0.000012728023,0.0037773042,0.00016946148,0.00049542444,0.00010161238,0.0003830077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016118073,0.00014895377,0.0001887611,0.00022302581,0.011328681,0.00077870855,0.00024328036,0.00043769393,0.00012018722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028139917,0.00002463869,0.0002708426,0.00006941788,0.00006504477,0.0000030804808,0.008620641,4.4967834e-7,0.000015864936,0.9817538,0.008602809,0.00054522837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049583893,0.000028599974,0.00040057857,0.00059917703,0.00025695827,0.00012688607,0.0074327295,0.000007469717,0.000017993367,0.0024562103,0.9878211,0.00035643752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075940713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026374622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97929764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001204606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021334102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99901444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121572801","doi":"","title":"Les sources des droits ancestraux des peuples autochtones","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03975376797065606,"score_gpt":0.3184205612378662,"score_spread":0.27866679326721017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121572801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8441097,0.13107431,0.0017023996,0.008016274,0.00090087653,0.0002080279,0.000004896154,0.000113815935,0.013869672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8835335,0.08065289,0.00065475365,0.000066699664,0.0026215704,0.000011881582,0.000001566708,0.00003982284,0.032417353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920366,0.0009155655,0.0005778492,0.00043941918,0.00080154836,0.005229057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982716,0.00038250402,0.00044723402,0.0001568441,0.00040403512,0.0003378073],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036049038,0.0004806756,0.0005539598,0.00007946304,0.0057709613,0.00040837936,0.0007730376,0.0003196697,0.00027507503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000752133,0.00039951014,0.00040081597,0.00054827624,0.0040983646,0.0009796207,0.000110126166,0.0023113089,0.00018335438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022852839,0.00012195028,0.02712692,0.000059217462,0.0003887257,0.0000032307262,0.025126765,0.0001306084,0.000099138604,0.6092841,0.00016211928,0.33747435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008108077,0.0006730668,0.046265516,0.00039801057,0.00032564494,0.00025547057,0.08890919,0.00016521374,0.00011229154,0.7044226,0.15676259,0.00089964323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026663067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11560249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3365747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031477637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010530796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121577596","doi":"","title":"Women and (Their) Children: Wrongs, Rights and Relationships","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Compromise; Law; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.019823033636860353,"score_gpt":0.2735317924037172,"score_spread":0.2537087587668569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121577596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882115,0.0035248103,0.000031173564,0.0036996205,0.00008714443,0.00012343569,0.0000013324379,0.000022179373,0.0042988006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99185306,0.004392264,0.000029426203,0.000018280332,0.000402703,0.0000048441384,4.494172e-7,0.0000058044116,0.0032931964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980607,0.0001607561,0.00013032198,0.00015356856,0.00017126136,0.0013233705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994497,0.00007184026,0.00017083329,0.00010340385,0.00005836005,0.00014591505],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001915097,0.00011154178,0.00015002191,0.000024372132,0.00834397,0.00035953042,0.00022862483,0.00008230265,0.000018194774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003136071,0.00007673308,0.000034338536,0.000032862707,0.0005031031,0.0004916525,0.000069387854,0.0010529148,0.000009336786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034286113,0.000050436673,0.32760635,0.000003950082,0.00048844615,0.0000025540196,0.112994894,8.066535e-7,0.00004581447,0.5145107,0.0003037471,0.043958023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061735703,0.000094825395,0.3550973,0.000013903563,0.000018753233,0.00007753551,0.023773406,0.000004406057,0.000006204477,0.60961413,0.010451541,0.00023065643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025154294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014007528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09510341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006713407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000245414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99294704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121649698","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1212","title":"\"The question calls for an answer, and I propose to answer it\": The Patriation Reference as Constitutional Method","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Jurisprudence; Law; Context (archaeology); Convention; Political science; Constitutional law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.1268063496359986,"score_gpt":0.4228136742720102,"score_spread":0.29600732463601165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121649698","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009198165,0.38430965,0.027727444,0.2941075,0.005369443,0.04308666,0.00033804856,0.0007190184,0.23514406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5844959,0.2657003,0.09688737,0.03960056,0.0022255024,0.0039542145,0.00012443685,0.000060660754,0.0069510327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813086,0.00072686304,0.00028168148,0.00025772082,0.000351596,0.00025125564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986803,0.00030658089,0.00012092911,0.00018205678,0.00058266445,0.00012748226],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030644746,0.00013248387,0.00021580412,0.000007128175,0.0018853351,0.000092529786,0.0002732468,0.00007107249,0.00006507489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011252448,0.000069629736,0.00006613025,0.00013264258,0.00074466865,0.00028935669,0.00005060674,0.00011077772,0.000034268225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019586256,0.000028079556,0.000100839505,0.00011676383,0.000023738534,2.1293978e-7,0.0027299009,2.9799207e-7,0.00002731453,0.9588702,0.006266731,0.031816363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009272639,0.00008242025,0.0005356189,0.0004101948,0.00009484585,0.0000016430499,0.00070611085,0.00000635726,0.00002320033,0.005965738,0.99194634,0.00013479995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0088565685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011827681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9856796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000104807004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001995931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121649844","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3191","title":"Renewing Human Rights Law in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Assembly of First Nations","funders":"","keywords":"Backlash; Human rights; Legislature; Political science; Context (archaeology); Face (sociological concept); Law; Law reform; International human rights law; Sociology; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.043535590972998264,"score_gpt":0.3181844516267179,"score_spread":0.27464886065371963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121649844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11711933,0.000134284,0.000001364561,0.00402815,0.0006698069,0.000090847374,0.0000029009432,0.000014510595,0.8779388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99790883,0.00002614183,0.00017387322,0.0002129588,0.0006856796,0.0000032819632,6.4765607e-7,0.000007677802,0.0009809326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982603,0.00016920699,0.00027791405,0.00016867337,0.00059132057,0.00053259404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914885,0.000057371497,0.00025955157,0.00018885675,0.00011239743,0.00023296535],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059205823,0.00013218693,0.00023219282,0.000012897489,0.013834957,0.0005452917,0.0006767106,0.0000710716,0.00021234828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007684226,0.00010375957,0.00007311363,0.0000341872,0.0003917144,0.00060494913,0.00010059693,0.00041103573,0.0000130671015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041206595,0.000018252831,0.012592496,0.0000034183968,0.000032141932,0.00018056332,0.0033476998,0.000015491998,0.000056966535,0.9818834,0.0015624403,0.00030301636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001933366,0.000049254155,0.107151985,0.000357612,0.000055300454,0.000034668814,0.008169729,0.000016706637,0.00045712775,0.22543195,0.65540445,0.00093784643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88078946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013332375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019327251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9874489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121691978","doi":"","title":"Conceptual Metaphors for an Unfinished Constitution","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Humanities; Elaboration; Narrative; Philosophy; Metaphor; Political science; Sociology; Law; Theology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07686921584781906,"score_gpt":0.31981230334428523,"score_spread":0.24294308749646618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121691978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26744482,0.051877655,0.096710786,0.051072218,0.0347977,0.008821117,0.0012484085,0.0015116187,0.48651567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98331225,0.0016451188,0.0073294905,0.00047389275,0.0026705891,0.00021492579,0.000111675196,0.000021609721,0.0042204424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962725,0.00074279297,0.0007665828,0.00085381116,0.00042866686,0.0009356229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714655,0.0010035693,0.00038930846,0.00037332525,0.00063351175,0.00045371134],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013935283,0.00052237127,0.0008116688,0.000082897255,0.0031405094,0.00024449936,0.00053801667,0.0005193486,0.0003529785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020740186,0.0005153728,0.00043942095,0.0004806971,0.012650796,0.001058627,0.000105303654,0.00032039915,0.0002732288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004104097,0.00026193427,0.00059495587,0.0001196324,0.0002377223,0.0000028903842,0.011519038,0.0009728695,0.000244242,0.9760524,0.0026699302,0.007283342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012609499,0.0003120813,0.00027692708,0.00031953483,0.00048116405,0.000015401574,0.0248251,0.0013932919,0.00021063689,0.0054732333,0.9646528,0.0007788968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002912396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050290534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97057915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005507809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048939534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121809235","doi":"","title":"Rights of Love: The State and Intimate Relationships in Canada and the United States","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; State (computer science); Construct (python library); Legislature; Political science; Corporate governance; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02106228883660999,"score_gpt":0.2366987364455083,"score_spread":0.2156364476088983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121809235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9463038,0.000010089144,0.000006138284,0.004664897,0.000028951028,0.0004339034,0.000013717116,0.000011121344,0.048527427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96609586,0.03369739,0.00004314134,0.00008571954,0.000008633827,3.8608601e-7,0.0000026004495,0.0000021011617,0.000064139465],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988776,0.0004892299,0.000115973904,0.00013209564,0.00018758382,0.00019751686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991467,0.0005398278,0.000096128024,0.00008808034,0.0000919796,0.000037275197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038196213,0.000092063296,0.0001448344,0.00060693035,0.0005722257,0.000032900854,0.0001770579,0.00003065392,0.0000059221825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001322954,0.00005362086,0.00002037221,0.0029508453,0.0005139057,0.00018014605,0.000066977846,0.00018725824,8.207842e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037287822,0.00006726122,0.037269488,0.00003164547,0.0001476908,0.000054012107,0.90347147,0.0004835269,0.0000016412026,0.052107826,0.0006049382,0.005387624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014929471,0.000029875813,0.054017715,0.000037858328,0.0000555836,8.094724e-7,0.064490706,0.0007553234,0.00001962128,0.00024283292,0.87866896,0.00018775795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9984942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99825627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87806404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003013708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027645886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44011554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121870366","doi":"","title":"Protecting Children from Exposure to Domestic Violence: The Use and Abuse of Child Maltreatment Statutes","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Statutory law; Jurisdiction; Domestic violence; Juvenile court; Political science; Child abuse; Child protection; Criminology; Population; Law; Poison control; Psychology; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Juvenile delinquency; Environmental health","score_opus":0.02700128016482885,"score_gpt":0.28991874690504005,"score_spread":0.2629174667402112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121870366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942854,0.0005084796,0.000032499305,0.0030417813,0.00005022888,0.0010517216,0.000016311576,0.000055921944,0.0009576214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969974,0.0011272496,0.001150337,0.0002540103,0.00011721801,0.00005764208,0.000002178969,0.000005906969,0.00028801474],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989071,0.00015849543,0.00016919024,0.00021782823,0.0002903432,0.0002570457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992339,0.00038348552,0.00007299611,0.0001316568,0.00008288463,0.00009504974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002194092,0.0001219985,0.00016322757,0.000016571674,0.0010431629,0.00010776224,0.00015585277,0.00004954344,0.00006495771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047484445,0.000066390996,0.000040643226,0.00019674104,0.00022704384,0.00019277069,0.00006220602,0.000112236135,0.0000103313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004572589,0.0001630106,0.8177263,0.000005644052,0.0002299649,0.0000044650305,0.15820116,0.00011438332,0.00016556971,0.0015476368,0.00033434576,0.021461792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036571568,0.00010396767,0.9780428,0.00011671842,0.0000453819,0.0000019705803,0.017275125,0.0000053829403,0.00022642426,0.00025231653,0.0033967644,0.00016746043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0587237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006435464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16031647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000668845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015226355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94754434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121899565","doi":"","title":"M v. H: Time to Clean Up Your Acts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Lesbian; Legitimacy; Deference; Judicial deference; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.028958801284463567,"score_gpt":0.30289778322778094,"score_spread":0.2739389819433174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121899565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94177246,0.0013209987,0.00012217327,0.017514864,0.00047543788,0.00030130747,0.000001882942,0.00013498406,0.038355894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9044283,0.0027832848,0.00007150126,0.00032576645,0.0010534221,0.0000044616413,7.051737e-7,0.000015327703,0.09131724],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962119,0.00017510039,0.00021135999,0.00018684284,0.00058121915,0.002633563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993176,0.00005601467,0.000100670346,0.00009125921,0.00016835188,0.0002661309],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001317479,0.00014630747,0.00020222485,0.000052500814,0.0023090106,0.000059802755,0.00040249556,0.0000884128,0.00042044945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004401256,0.0001180742,0.00013612302,0.000296603,0.00021888137,0.00028305806,0.000059636335,0.0010678328,0.0021520015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004310097,0.000505136,0.009274492,0.00001259135,0.0015707318,0.00012710542,0.39043534,0.00019301554,0.0032333585,0.26852512,0.12236683,0.20332527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011622367,0.00053328223,0.009629544,0.00003373076,0.00006211673,0.00029189177,0.08892281,0.000011863342,0.00017191519,0.019637356,0.8787343,0.0008089649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001140827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004618014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75636744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019931945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013521087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121974619","doi":"10.1017/s0731126500011525","title":"International Human Rights in Canada: At the Juncture of Law and Politics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Information","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; International human rights law; Law; International law; Treaty; Principle of legality; Politics","score_opus":0.013469752923166326,"score_gpt":0.2873841096292457,"score_spread":0.2739143567060794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121974619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89396614,0.00003928088,0.000015659614,0.019039452,0.0011630462,0.00013639138,0.000018444425,0.0000033737308,0.085618205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987267,0.00002130333,0.00007136094,0.0006323798,0.0002706039,0.00000256846,0.000007701902,0.000001332375,0.00026601786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984832,0.000049699036,0.00050461694,0.000033920765,0.00081587996,0.000112688824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984456,0.000098639866,0.00044014875,0.000035294623,0.0009294104,0.00005093952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026444707,0.00006717551,0.00011087029,0.00006561172,0.00023272527,0.00012484989,0.00033399128,0.000037229354,0.00024357776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011096651,0.000041745243,0.000042393214,0.000047061836,0.00018455823,0.0019120334,0.00007511018,0.00015659758,0.000005572734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041534884,0.000044056815,0.019425921,0.000012924588,0.00030249995,0.000010751758,0.03265266,0.0005926781,0.00026982088,0.91482395,0.029789358,0.002033848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005399939,0.000019692514,0.06647549,0.000047277423,0.000009131227,0.000019540346,0.002696025,0.000104486586,0.00034741103,0.0021895128,0.9274641,0.000087337794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93662196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8738885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91263443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011226318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001620744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29356432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121975356","doi":"","title":"Fake It Till You Make it: Policymaking and Assisted Human Reproduction in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Reimbursement; Legitimacy; Reproduction; Business; Law; Public administration; Political science; Law and economics; Health care; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.025021490122726534,"score_gpt":0.3082142648839226,"score_spread":0.2831927747611961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121975356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95923984,0.00085712835,0.00002423799,0.028275937,0.00030054103,0.00015093887,0.0000012439442,0.00001922364,0.011130886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947765,0.0009834827,0.000022749553,0.0002832205,0.00079467474,0.0000043318364,0.0000012696372,0.000010097827,0.0031236862],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970976,0.00029544398,0.00029450626,0.00026502932,0.00043374317,0.0016136417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945056,0.000054052238,0.00019040874,0.000104930354,0.00010098639,0.00009905794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002423904,0.00013221228,0.00020546185,0.00005468797,0.0012600612,0.00009028701,0.00018491656,0.00006643182,0.000023423876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005498544,0.00011358296,0.00004432202,0.00022986505,0.00011913391,0.0001333524,0.000041579882,0.0010133656,0.0000026537273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007864118,0.00014400056,0.21781667,0.00004389573,0.00048915803,0.000022122278,0.060873803,0.00012488516,0.00203858,0.30046082,0.004271413,0.41363603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018070681,0.00024751064,0.3308853,0.00014831172,0.000092190196,0.00019638802,0.2268104,0.00007055817,0.00006776291,0.04165958,0.39707935,0.000935614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9312733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4127004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052879774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019551115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99853057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122025011","doi":"","title":"Parental Alienation in Quebec Custody Litigation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Skepticism; Child custody; Criminology; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03379692468240754,"score_gpt":0.3786713503598373,"score_spread":0.34487442567742976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122025011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9163465,0.000050485345,0.00001736615,0.007871737,0.00025286336,0.00016730417,5.911524e-7,0.00006332754,0.07522985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835519,0.000018599878,0.00014496996,0.00009597823,0.00038105503,0.000012479101,0.0000037624707,0.0000033234678,0.01578793],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927044,0.000102031845,0.000084918414,0.00012145477,0.00023132704,0.00018984021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997361,0.000043042684,0.00004214236,0.000048680336,0.00008618322,0.000043868695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023163184,0.000055256925,0.00006892574,0.0000232711,0.00035918417,0.000049199927,0.00008091719,0.00005466742,0.00024998584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022741561,0.000048596397,0.000021239484,0.00020577137,0.00029463903,0.0002098806,0.000025340918,0.000054014847,0.0002200489],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000148407335,0.00006809315,0.054948915,0.0000070426045,0.000012159349,0.000002168898,0.8834052,0.0000056858507,0.0014733794,0.03725539,0.009838689,0.012968419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005019421,0.000050266517,0.38920802,0.000045534314,0.000009734763,1.9451188e-7,0.2829971,0.00012491598,0.0018209965,0.0008392414,0.3241087,0.0002933481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4032049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6024404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6004081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037518042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038087397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6007692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122100145","doi":"","title":"Family as Status in Doe v. Canada: Constituting Family Under Section 15 of the Charter","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Jurisprudence; Assertion; Law; Section (typography); Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.022180678568294504,"score_gpt":0.2787098078567885,"score_spread":0.25652912928849403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122100145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8753895,0.0004960975,0.000018037714,0.0010321564,0.0014580499,0.00032294582,0.000008959281,0.000032880787,0.121241376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965652,0.00004612851,0.000076724304,0.0017835671,0.00035083896,0.00000828565,0.0000015529171,0.000007708469,0.0011599836],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980395,0.00017748319,0.00033704055,0.00022556749,0.0006374293,0.00058299786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991783,0.00018940223,0.00014722503,0.00015028406,0.00014654451,0.00018824857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007447717,0.00014045245,0.00021058701,0.000023537743,0.0006924603,0.000050222177,0.00022611125,0.00012528806,0.00004753807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038498236,0.000102058904,0.00006894104,0.00038449094,0.00055184297,0.00021426877,0.00008219203,0.00034406543,0.000019993295],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012550017,0.00018762228,0.56995916,0.00006682129,0.00021462991,0.0000531288,0.03921662,0.0006771859,0.011200576,0.36013535,0.014808325,0.0033550905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075679924,0.000025334302,0.6944303,0.00008939412,0.000020658517,9.657755e-7,0.08282456,0.000005488452,0.0009465574,0.00079447817,0.21980639,0.0002991051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98203623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35934085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011023029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007583397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53259146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122291241","doi":"","title":"Conflict resolution processes in end-of-life care disputes between families and healthcare providers in Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Empathy; Health care; Legislature; Conflict resolution; Face (sociological concept); End-of-life care; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Nursing; Palliative care; Social science; Medicine","score_opus":0.05180825918322724,"score_gpt":0.33128338459594103,"score_spread":0.2794751254127138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122291241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9346131,0.03994546,0.000002121601,0.024713134,0.00018336296,0.0002686092,0.000044088138,0.000008433393,0.00022170713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823137,0.017255615,0.00009256845,0.00010434293,0.00017842127,0.000010294135,6.405367e-7,0.000008461724,0.000035943704],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977312,0.00025682777,0.00076029135,0.00018099381,0.0006725993,0.00039808446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741656,0.00088839605,0.0005024567,0.00006160718,0.0009932856,0.00013767714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005038267,0.00017928645,0.0006930638,0.00012352988,0.00032728523,0.000029086106,0.00020335907,0.00006519932,0.0000021991161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003761558,0.00011064776,0.000047921472,0.0003817597,0.0006698843,0.0005678901,0.00010373533,0.00020216247,2.5662297e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006068632,0.000015163777,0.87628025,0.0003743209,0.00011437883,0.000022965534,0.11400316,0.000008357156,0.000025366715,0.00048182116,0.00045777266,0.008155785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010882214,0.00014984793,0.5927157,0.0010234991,0.00003703327,0.0000016310248,0.37836665,4.1237791e-7,0.000108482775,0.00010762736,0.02617454,0.00022633592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88066465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99290854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2835645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012532169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025057741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45120844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122371168","doi":"","title":"Property and Belongingness: Rethinking Gender-Biased Disinheritance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas journal of women and the law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Estate; Law; Sociology; Property (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Political science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06671037852041627,"score_gpt":0.28051308911035244,"score_spread":0.21380271058993616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122371168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9568719,0.002540768,0.000011409477,0.0026089577,0.00014423896,0.000128791,4.896068e-7,0.000013734183,0.037679687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99746305,0.0008329922,0.00034242182,0.000370632,0.00014863203,0.0000020004038,2.995288e-8,0.000004686139,0.00083554705],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990488,0.00020062532,0.00018742202,0.000076105505,0.000243362,0.00024365252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944746,0.00011787487,0.00017095552,0.000051589646,0.00010233747,0.00010976715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017184565,0.00007881247,0.00021462637,0.000010939415,0.0007701884,0.000083504434,0.00015897921,0.00003923269,0.00005850059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015499328,0.000034150366,0.00003891697,0.000070818256,0.0010973477,0.0002589421,0.000050464638,0.00017076776,0.0000017523357],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021008907,0.00003458317,0.008368455,0.000022387976,0.00012936519,0.000018195666,0.75597715,2.0797162e-7,0.000032789405,0.23250093,0.00009908515,0.0026067651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0082907835,0.0004513921,0.12995924,0.00035628246,0.00020977175,0.000121972174,0.18580364,0.00003205957,0.00022116977,0.5427809,0.13094835,0.0008244424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013889129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032686704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5701735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008921101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023151568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59237444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122456056","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1857566","title":"Dworkin's Shadow: Equality Rights and the Supreme Court of Canada's Loss of Dignity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Dignity; Shadow (psychology); Download; Political science; Law; Internet privacy; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Psychology","score_opus":0.02563080300869999,"score_gpt":0.2712209691812855,"score_spread":0.24559016617258553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122456056","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9788606,0.0034880724,0.000094694595,0.0041226693,0.00021669964,0.00028803098,0.000012512217,0.000011027903,0.012905681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969265,0.0019347001,0.000024783729,0.0000317193,0.00012652978,0.000002561729,2.798586e-7,0.0000040401874,0.0009489046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997425,0.00046984278,0.00032235932,0.000113561546,0.000549987,0.0011192253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990443,0.00020197389,0.00032174337,0.00009659321,0.0002487532,0.00008663063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036667618,0.00010727436,0.0002849015,0.000015125065,0.00086616585,0.000012326258,0.00034095757,0.000060426635,0.000048530874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024318011,0.00006116392,0.00008990277,0.00012698892,0.000866824,0.00011170046,0.000056942317,0.000663349,5.0819045e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027545486,0.00008836871,0.029217532,0.000019155796,0.0005173167,0.000002403643,0.046381816,0.0000014229408,0.000028467639,0.9213382,0.000650449,0.0014794142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024670002,0.00019552467,0.06470682,0.000067137495,0.00019868523,0.000026710713,0.040284403,0.000010036904,0.0004827342,0.8794309,0.011759619,0.0003704366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8977371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.981678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08394096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084815256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001999971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66619354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122529843","doi":"","title":"Children of Two Logics: A Way into Canadian Constitutional Culture","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Indigenous; Constitutional law; Political science; Law; Constitutional economics; Indigenous rights; Constitutional theory; Sociology; Human rights; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.009464410061252485,"score_gpt":0.274275950649113,"score_spread":0.2648115405878605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122529843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92294115,0.010270218,0.00052685745,0.016851624,0.0005848513,0.0008347262,0.000015813288,0.00006467456,0.047910064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99500674,0.0021932567,0.00025031305,0.00016386755,0.0006562636,0.000008792355,0.000004630232,0.000004463404,0.0017116865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742323,0.00013354486,0.00022577142,0.00013925642,0.0003843727,0.0016938029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991708,0.000030470466,0.00013594903,0.00006412793,0.00034706615,0.0002515961],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008283578,0.00012545426,0.00018145822,0.000056837507,0.0013878858,0.00007983873,0.0003379449,0.00010114613,0.00031346214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023273684,0.00009064495,0.00011753419,0.00019315297,0.00095061254,0.00031848552,0.00002693477,0.0009626069,0.00011535482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026027399,0.000022698427,0.032386106,0.0000014622774,0.00019623857,8.817144e-7,0.008275327,0.00001635563,0.00011409444,0.9521519,0.0018546956,0.004977649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015150536,0.00025401005,0.046433058,0.000053696447,0.00010109343,0.00013909739,0.055936184,0.000012723884,0.00007261027,0.84674513,0.048082005,0.00065536203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5989697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77997303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18100333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024734244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003754159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122569314","doi":"","title":"Structures of Judgment: How the ModernSupreme Court of Canada Organizes its Reasons","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.02497555007228185,"score_gpt":0.26464781071650384,"score_spread":0.23967226064422198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122569314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89711964,0.0027861318,0.000037411723,0.062935434,0.00070143375,0.0003682225,0.00008313373,0.0000345208,0.035934076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983043,0.00032924817,0.00018954909,0.00032266002,0.00032140664,7.549988e-7,8.779474e-7,0.0000068727027,0.00052432826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982026,0.00017974526,0.00024099149,0.000105954925,0.0009100211,0.00036066724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988262,0.00015124373,0.00033093133,0.00011502964,0.0004421535,0.00013445369],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043149505,0.00012521463,0.00025713598,0.000013327401,0.00153532,0.00008040592,0.00047787462,0.00006484439,0.00009522263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043175614,0.00007532011,0.000082581,0.00016707554,0.00029063504,0.00017782889,0.000041174448,0.0002598649,4.7317812e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009732691,0.00025497447,0.006762253,0.000071895134,0.0009726949,0.000081658305,0.19663157,0.001213454,0.015203015,0.57856756,0.19315982,0.006983806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027372004,0.00047841438,0.2142782,0.00032304614,0.0005429824,0.00012194336,0.15341207,0.00018009942,0.03413358,0.03262967,0.5601234,0.001039379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22105533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74074763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5459379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017197152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031535566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122584327","doi":"10.3138/jcs.43.3.146","title":"Sunshine Cases of a Little Constitution","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Feeling; Contemplation; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Federalist; Law; Diversity (politics); Ideology; Aesthetics; History; Politics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09047524147165761,"score_gpt":0.3650112640917478,"score_spread":0.27453602262009014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122584327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7348442,0.09229279,0.0000058622827,0.08765953,0.0012940684,0.00033998917,0.00004412335,0.000022640632,0.08349676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941183,0.0046221036,0.00025616155,0.00028748906,0.00032515088,8.5277355e-7,1.7419706e-7,0.0000015052652,0.00038827915],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900085,0.00008161422,0.00031942595,0.00005871814,0.0003119071,0.00022749686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852145,0.00019586255,0.00026124818,0.000044557582,0.0007746161,0.00020225203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051327195,0.000084529776,0.00039900045,0.00020992087,0.00049044966,0.000019362125,0.00012312105,0.000043340755,0.000051371702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018877136,0.00005829425,0.00016261505,0.00038134027,0.0005166833,0.00020062173,0.0000084093,0.0001052306,0.0000026178739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014567263,0.00022516072,0.024046356,0.00010594423,0.008807166,0.0013133927,0.25997365,0.00015980503,0.00059494853,0.25077438,0.42503902,0.02881452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053474127,0.000431696,0.038612794,0.00014109704,0.00086143543,0.000056834375,0.08679853,5.158997e-7,0.00022981821,0.0024574492,0.86962956,0.00024554358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19150123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.664495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47299373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034513156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041116434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81388265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122689219","doi":"","title":"Federal Constitutionalism and Aboriginal Difference","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Federalism; Treaty; Law; Sovereignty; Political science; Autonomy; Constitution; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.007391731028377972,"score_gpt":0.20896961210449158,"score_spread":0.2015778810761136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122689219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8638092,0.0058724126,0.00014041149,0.0024076249,0.00035815174,0.00019572051,0.000021261636,0.00013820817,0.12705699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717947,0.00032634317,0.00054728915,0.00010440675,0.00029129052,0.000010024106,0.000012900012,0.0000046255914,0.026908383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985659,0.00010651849,0.00016258263,0.00029956264,0.000510579,0.00035483408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993579,0.000099218894,0.00009593382,0.00009343931,0.0001678585,0.00018564823],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014426901,0.00016879123,0.00017452888,0.00005369424,0.015331724,0.00010099248,0.00017372835,0.00012854667,0.00003434134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004012169,0.00016507985,0.00008473381,0.00015577557,0.0014783549,0.00029267822,0.00008328749,0.0001518453,0.000021170312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068561065,0.00007789098,0.15053968,0.0000118707785,0.00005774562,0.00034000314,0.020392042,0.00011090468,0.0023947076,0.82386154,0.0013235897,0.0008214387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008460368,0.000026929085,0.5170879,0.000041414303,0.00005858823,0.00014429136,0.018576048,0.00009034457,0.00043531077,0.002851708,0.45942938,0.0004120841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2999354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03600769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8210099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026984753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006471637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9859502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122700238","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4480","title":"Dizzying Dialogue: Canadian Courts and the Continuing Justification of the Dispossession Of Aboriginal People","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Doctrine; Supreme court; Conciliation; Law; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Arbitration","score_opus":0.03848112590642711,"score_gpt":0.3252010623644886,"score_spread":0.2867199364580615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122700238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98851603,0.0002066234,0.000027617209,0.0015878845,0.00031673186,0.00052981346,0.000016728347,0.000008179021,0.008790416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99938047,0.000112501926,0.00015268395,0.00005395237,0.00009925338,0.000015600295,7.080879e-7,0.0000059425925,0.00017890931],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989223,0.00016301707,0.00025772076,0.00013616963,0.00031978727,0.00020101287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889565,0.0002911525,0.0002756415,0.00016939008,0.00027610606,0.00009205119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006329672,0.0000851083,0.00021855168,0.00003943761,0.00033889274,0.00003560832,0.00051831955,0.00005881202,0.000041138574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007228157,0.000049420396,0.000051518622,0.0002226868,0.00062636955,0.00022684751,0.00009388272,0.000096436386,0.0000016157115],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027374105,0.00008771555,0.18062504,0.0004355948,0.00010340061,0.0000011591134,0.7456391,0.00006125478,0.002753231,0.06336348,0.00094452564,0.0057117883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004284804,0.000018149218,0.97357297,0.00023981163,0.0003202798,2.6087847e-7,0.019897329,0.000039777402,0.0018061927,0.0003035597,0.0032513975,0.000121805744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42611974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18533252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7929479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056450946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012871163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82953304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122749857","doi":"","title":"Section 15(1) at the Supreme Court 2001-2002: Caution and Conflict in Defining “The Most Difficult Right”","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Section (typography); Law; Political science; High Court; Theme (computing); Sociology","score_opus":0.06232311638796742,"score_gpt":0.30792491247418763,"score_spread":0.2456017960862202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122749857","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1164862,0.44838998,0.00031948063,0.20382132,0.003312856,0.008940568,0.0025351455,0.00056237786,0.2156321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9445559,0.049024403,0.000026788017,0.0027853877,0.00034647042,0.00020426764,0.000062973355,0.000012175877,0.0029816506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956039,0.0011647053,0.0007279187,0.00058750244,0.0011285889,0.0007873889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99662393,0.0013781805,0.00034960263,0.00042769173,0.0010316252,0.00018898712],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002053337,0.00045082602,0.00056726136,0.000033614062,0.00514612,0.0002534704,0.00066411385,0.00018984033,0.0022542663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015764793,0.00023959123,0.00016980698,0.0005836001,0.009064188,0.0006007107,0.00032391737,0.00068894826,0.00025577305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039399463,0.00010081776,0.0010818028,0.000117248346,0.0001023882,0.000040845225,0.005746231,0.000104038176,0.00006670933,0.8844236,0.107333325,0.0008435589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000510617,0.00007031552,0.002870048,0.0008332704,0.00021746448,0.00023540616,0.0038248992,0.00043005048,0.000022388824,0.000314576,0.99016994,0.00050101837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022981565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08531655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8841091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005237165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025517493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122932967","doi":"","title":"Women’s Court of Canada Act and Rules","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.19605175340236447,"score_gpt":0.5225553035277017,"score_spread":0.32650355012533727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122932967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96668285,0.0054793716,0.0000033886715,0.0011696641,0.0005554831,0.00029880326,0.00004054438,0.000016495515,0.025753427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99226415,0.0057881363,0.00010368982,0.00023201042,0.00034183497,0.000021376409,0.0000011960209,0.000015572237,0.0012320214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997423,0.00028711202,0.0005256243,0.00027395698,0.0009706279,0.000519662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978548,0.00038504996,0.0006217272,0.00018378368,0.00060571317,0.000348891],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014882162,0.00020544574,0.0006233573,0.00012540596,0.0010716307,0.0005213624,0.0015291887,0.00008647795,0.007297779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093765254,0.0001646037,0.000070143426,0.00043087764,0.0009095496,0.0012625325,0.00061567704,0.00019716687,0.000004490982],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121146026,0.00011431462,0.76512897,0.000073959716,0.00037740188,0.000014333848,0.022588914,0.0000041202666,0.006135951,0.00065892935,0.19381538,0.01096659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000257904,0.000010607315,0.84438473,0.00012878962,0.000029844407,0.0000010565952,0.0051969797,0.0000044381163,0.0021551305,0.0019245571,0.14563923,0.0002667119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6721343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44839036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22374392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052355736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059552805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99360967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123014080","doi":"","title":"Judging in Marriage's Shadow","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Openness to experience; Shadow (psychology); Ideal (ethics); Operationalization; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Diversity (politics); Law; Political science; Social psychology; Gender studies; Psychology; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022279420709753237,"score_gpt":0.32493288851896934,"score_spread":0.3026534678092161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123014080","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9170898,0.0019769631,0.000101445636,0.021160994,0.00068067835,0.00020793988,8.168118e-7,0.000044486686,0.058736827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885277,0.0053458354,0.000044551485,0.000066443776,0.00072627416,0.0000050385474,2.3896501e-7,0.00000895259,0.005274946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968569,0.00012612609,0.00019150104,0.00015757632,0.00036642764,0.0023014576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994286,0.000051362673,0.00020873745,0.00014858515,0.00007199626,0.00009073791],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002881961,0.00010999953,0.00017338517,0.000045018653,0.003425374,0.00036740708,0.0006681968,0.000083097395,0.00007630438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086509937,0.00009088286,0.000095204756,0.00006781934,0.00025508174,0.0005765697,0.00008705142,0.001400129,0.000055631623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004109796,0.00007947858,0.20251393,0.000005948255,0.0001664471,0.000035496854,0.020956555,0.000016445476,0.00026654633,0.6235165,0.0005618432,0.15183969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022286316,0.00019164538,0.23186271,0.000122042264,0.000050708666,0.00004806245,0.101761036,0.000040324376,0.00005549113,0.61238486,0.050489426,0.0007650456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014112141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16225946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15107465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001958765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000860329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99787205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123033447","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-4710-4","title":"Dialogues on Human Rights and Legal Pluralism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Ius gentium","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Human rights; Legal pluralism; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Law; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Legal research; Legal realism","score_opus":0.06436380612440411,"score_gpt":0.3301025778831703,"score_spread":0.2657387717587662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123033447","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011862667,0.0024260909,3.45112e-7,0.00098415,0.0023246456,0.00055405387,0.00006425116,0.00017347539,0.9816103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06970209,0.00012028731,0.000032185042,0.00015023128,0.0036431768,0.00002615143,0.000093802424,0.000026144595,0.92620593],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979702,0.00014646133,0.00025425534,0.000399445,0.00064476684,0.00058483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999166,0.00010870403,0.00018946505,0.00019241797,0.00010905032,0.00023434097],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029142754,0.00034711952,0.00043726503,0.000059998245,0.0022154257,0.00020549679,0.00030084242,0.0004587221,0.00042757342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035434678,0.00026841764,0.00017433308,0.00004639726,0.00078097533,0.00022266113,0.00014731227,0.00040025284,0.0005131367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000110513,0.000071344264,0.00016438401,0.000054076416,0.00026257389,0.000040705552,0.029372491,2.3765548e-7,0.000037501602,0.35355917,0.61575747,0.0006689874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016254024,0.000031628126,0.0013741133,0.00006206193,0.00009155019,7.8064954e-7,0.00016476506,7.968048e-8,0.0000145549075,0.0047449064,0.99296856,0.0003844562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013154487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015548129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3772111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000441986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005645201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123237373","doi":"10.59962/9780774814997-013","title":"11 Law’s Religion: Rendering Culture","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rendering (computer graphics); Sociology; Art; Computer science; Computer graphics (images)","score_opus":0.0243890172007462,"score_gpt":0.21935898858915182,"score_spread":0.1949699713884056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123237373","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021647307,0.0012042917,0.000003739054,0.00009118967,0.00018914457,0.00047280514,0.00018274845,0.00019593335,0.9974437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0065408335,0.0030765198,0.00040735255,0.00008986762,0.0002279813,4.1819752e-7,0.000017886345,0.000020960619,0.9896182],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823344,0.00006283317,0.00021555064,0.0004762185,0.0006514383,0.0003605005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886006,0.00004084261,0.00031471366,0.00022582726,0.00037839077,0.00018017953],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015141045,0.00017880643,0.0005290806,0.000017042463,0.0012932747,0.00021925074,0.0005874627,0.00062553876,0.0002297365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022176082,0.0003764392,0.00032257286,0.000010949065,0.0012039428,0.00014522916,0.00025638504,0.00038170614,0.0000092866185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025551812,0.00004426307,0.000034724402,0.00017887878,0.0003879539,0.0007765774,0.024977444,0.0000031820714,0.000010197536,0.2200632,0.7046393,0.048858695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033991665,0.000038601964,0.00011783972,0.00057152484,0.00014293936,0.000006252595,0.001222066,4.988712e-7,9.3800094e-7,0.0033777952,0.993764,0.0004176369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.777051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9041003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28912467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031321272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008090871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123265750","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1359","title":"Choices and Commitments for Women: Challenging the Supreme Court of Canada in the Context of Social Assitance","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Supreme Court Decisions; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.030901921147828425,"score_gpt":0.2915819025345159,"score_spread":0.26067998138668746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123265750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79247284,0.0034310385,0.00003611209,0.08137594,0.000533832,0.0010108409,0.00006255183,0.000010606046,0.12106626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992116,0.00017374373,0.000053491476,0.0003026706,0.0001562993,0.000018925017,3.3165242e-7,0.000004210026,0.00007874588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998747,0.0001590834,0.00024921974,0.00007863224,0.00045766478,0.00030841806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992428,0.00028838048,0.00023824045,0.000049780276,0.00013478743,0.000046028235],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011367812,0.00008528836,0.000205721,0.000009121581,0.001683353,0.00004750826,0.00031039983,0.00004214775,0.000011345711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010987493,0.00004804373,0.000049638504,0.000072166644,0.00038544336,0.00013488407,0.000027116117,0.0001832723,1.00116445e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005428565,0.00011099116,0.0031045037,0.00004984182,0.00017205493,0.000005316203,0.2710261,0.00006552037,0.0000970526,0.722976,0.0008709178,0.0014673927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003960679,0.00019553532,0.07506707,0.00018431485,0.000057476653,0.000011145068,0.8063291,0.000021289661,0.0002690573,0.043172732,0.070396416,0.00033524065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6633993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98834455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6798033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036796564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014225401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123288322","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal Title in Recent Supreme Court of Canada Jurisprudence: What Remains of Radical Crown Title?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Element (criminal law); Assertion; Negotiation; Doctrine; Sovereignty; Crown (dentistry); Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01471896982157139,"score_gpt":0.2902955722324222,"score_spread":0.2755766024108508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123288322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06768602,0.0015307425,0.000837437,0.013375364,0.0015899404,0.00030420313,0.000046547135,0.00002386992,0.91460586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99331564,0.00084967044,0.000513995,0.00008753796,0.00019586805,0.000004196167,0.0000048159122,0.0000018992389,0.005026406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995346,0.000028702867,0.00010398854,0.000056549165,0.00019854301,0.000077594595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996693,0.000081158825,0.00004382311,0.000035337773,0.00014202174,0.000028356402],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023702251,0.000027660053,0.00007281976,0.000020538853,0.00007128008,0.0000064759884,0.000067953835,0.000038567458,0.00096183777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003157148,0.000028561632,0.000016828342,0.00010656188,0.00021187769,0.000069146095,0.0000043195373,0.00005010794,0.000027347915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002370209,0.000021317932,0.0012922889,0.00001955122,0.000008156908,0.0000015266371,0.0007557252,0.00005071596,0.000047925674,0.96641356,0.03075806,0.0006287746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103024846,0.0000029700495,0.0039329436,0.00006362701,0.000004831069,0.0000012548903,0.0002769885,0.0001248599,0.000088878616,0.002860363,0.99248934,0.000050910483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014924334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07725878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96355325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003564344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000653765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123342964","doi":"","title":"Health Care and Human Rights after Auton and Chaoulli","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Entitlement (fair division); Supreme court; Law; Human rights; Political science; Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy); Health care; Right to health; Economics","score_opus":0.01750586372051126,"score_gpt":0.33855989130997166,"score_spread":0.3210540275894604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123342964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9369295,0.0030301134,0.0000022144866,0.016178312,0.000051016938,0.00023648153,0.0000021311762,0.000092587026,0.04347764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969271,0.00010093788,0.00026537554,0.0006905508,0.00011711649,0.0000045717625,0.0000010693193,0.0000016772734,0.0018916137],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993393,0.000054435714,0.0000854381,0.00015650742,0.00014701384,0.0002173083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976194,0.00001603653,0.000025117093,0.00004254848,0.000035612713,0.00011873672],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009870394,0.000074280724,0.00012665516,0.000011841401,0.0013833222,0.00006529208,0.000039941835,0.000045769284,0.00006087778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007353359,0.00004979182,0.000017783237,0.00004761415,0.00018537375,0.00011376758,0.000021511309,0.00005579928,0.000005693422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017901986,0.00006949208,0.03855169,0.00005896087,0.000036649,0.000010431317,0.6730126,2.4500403e-7,0.000059582122,0.22897178,0.011490044,0.047720592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000266066,0.00018574417,0.6790225,0.000022684002,0.0000073112124,4.358757e-7,0.012275836,0.0000010760956,0.000020455118,0.0018619817,0.3061436,0.00019229899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02752936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06611805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6607368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008841984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010457771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123410778","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511596766.014","title":"The Inuit Petition as a Bridge? Beyond Dialectics of Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples' Rights","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Dialectic; Bridge (graph theory); Climate change; Political science; Environmental ethics; Geography; Geology; Oceanography; Ecology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Medicine; Biology","score_opus":0.0281640969411972,"score_gpt":0.2400107049448777,"score_spread":0.2118466080036805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123410778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017576428,0.0010185197,0.0000012561237,0.00015980762,0.00021165638,0.0010601887,0.00023253064,0.000081997,0.9796576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08344974,0.013852887,0.000021572328,0.00006825982,0.00043759268,0.00000310957,0.000018825156,0.0000220837,0.90212595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983987,0.00012341153,0.00020591289,0.00034980016,0.0004878862,0.00043427892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986476,0.00029165883,0.00037980737,0.00022620402,0.0002941011,0.00016065789],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024869063,0.00029688023,0.0004025823,0.00007294596,0.0025310677,0.00009549572,0.00039714092,0.0003523204,0.0000036578767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047633937,0.0002557084,0.00016784511,0.00001886961,0.0011141995,0.00013935717,0.00027151874,0.00033926617,0.000007131421],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072526076,0.000012752619,0.000021988893,0.00006948668,0.0001219215,0.00006327866,0.04898922,8.7215646e-8,0.000005369298,0.9429413,0.0010450332,0.0066570546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039490455,0.00013109158,0.002302684,0.00020059965,0.0003392821,0.0000057851107,0.0021592847,0.0000010425554,0.000029149915,0.00023974058,0.9937362,0.00046021104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014106909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0097830165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9926912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043593784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013264846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123458335","doi":"10.5663/aps.v6i2.28316","title":"Daniels v. Canada: Origins, Intentions, Futures","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"aboriginal policy studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Supreme court; Futures contract; Law; Indigenous; Political science; Plaintiff; Transformative learning; Culmination; High Court; Sociology; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.05227079603683185,"score_gpt":0.4250142118501366,"score_spread":0.3727434158133047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123458335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48346466,0.012848284,0.000006748771,0.278802,0.0050841174,0.0012928883,0.00013310989,0.0003598584,0.21800832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97635835,0.0068499525,0.00020123833,0.0009584871,0.003826404,0.00010775177,0.0000019211952,0.000014221294,0.011681641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977878,0.00010491657,0.00025849367,0.00032650967,0.000813716,0.00070860644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998473,0.00014404813,0.00025716767,0.0003920739,0.0005444063,0.00018933414],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036718018,0.0002512044,0.00039036607,0.000050332805,0.009563652,0.00026222013,0.0007592453,0.00007353178,0.000021211452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022296365,0.00019518328,0.000107114334,0.0001538963,0.0013086735,0.00044570153,0.0001717901,0.0002152273,0.000031567888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017231614,0.000044377073,0.028840845,0.000039934755,0.00057746697,0.000040984894,0.024284724,0.0000021585922,0.000049360373,0.6144262,0.32547247,0.0062042135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020527524,0.00001719989,0.071561456,0.000043342432,0.000038567625,8.9287573e-7,0.02673201,5.2815625e-7,0.00004957634,0.0016205899,0.89947605,0.00025448695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9820962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98866224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6128056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018005694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015860384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99172574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123568123","doi":"","title":"Kahkewistahaw First Nation v. Taypotat – Whither Section 25 of the Charter?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Section (typography); Treaty; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.017927133674378728,"score_gpt":0.2576354158819763,"score_spread":0.23970828220759757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123568123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.923058,0.0013489776,0.00095593557,0.05770102,0.0017866652,0.0003985416,0.000004922169,0.00005792798,0.014688058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877055,0.0021968223,0.000008496354,0.000043756692,0.00062937237,0.0000059258996,1.4838939e-7,0.000008127834,0.009401823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807715,0.00019088582,0.0001972497,0.00011450977,0.00045078574,0.0009694264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936116,0.000083045605,0.00023221725,0.000083900086,0.0001977141,0.000041936215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012470081,0.00009206059,0.00011530546,0.000027289128,0.0011364736,0.00003427067,0.00026275605,0.000075445205,0.00009665052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002694164,0.000045355762,0.00012708806,0.00019015142,0.00023005878,0.00027006547,0.00003043551,0.00042120766,0.000019577881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011080006,0.00022888463,0.06368142,0.000021862825,0.0007378221,0.0000011735871,0.058874458,0.00001565286,0.013426588,0.7364452,0.0049779667,0.12147821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031213672,0.00052034506,0.13357653,0.00031214493,0.00017966212,0.00006829171,0.062428065,0.000014092794,0.0014797875,0.2354025,0.5621106,0.00078663114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020332092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060181927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5571326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016085985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045326113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9569673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123630022","doi":"","title":"Contract Thinking was Marvin's Fatal Flaw","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Obligation; Supreme court; Duty; Doctrine; Unjust enrichment; Annulment; Reciprocal; Cohabitation; Liability; Breach of contract; Sociology; Domestic relations; Legal doctrine; Political science; Law and economics; Family law; Damages; Philosophy; Restitution","score_opus":0.03328307539094221,"score_gpt":0.31744532127446023,"score_spread":0.284162245883518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123630022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30315575,0.00024215443,0.00007811168,0.012347662,0.00041832618,0.0002380133,0.0000017772373,0.00028187502,0.6832363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97950363,0.00027271974,0.00061786093,0.0007411417,0.0004946414,0.0000088305105,0.000002224836,0.0000063864977,0.018352555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871427,0.0000891525,0.00014216447,0.00018299019,0.00046192927,0.00040950082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949104,0.00017324777,0.00004839938,0.00008889484,0.00008979323,0.000108641725],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003976522,0.00010669309,0.00015328248,0.00001396736,0.0012953826,0.0001563959,0.00025841064,0.000088345754,0.0021701837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026846692,0.00007678425,0.00008406217,0.00015677096,0.00025592296,0.0003611639,0.00007580203,0.00012720983,0.00038406596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005140871,0.0001983848,0.09564677,0.000014418634,0.00022357299,0.00014110885,0.16424485,0.000012723252,0.0008376135,0.65428424,0.039242394,0.045102514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040848771,0.00002461477,0.046409573,0.000017128516,0.000022014077,0.0000026201353,0.031394307,0.000035150686,0.000146282,0.0024302688,0.9187735,0.0003361093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025842482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019426443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.879531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015080921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027989703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123647317","doi":"10.1080/13200968.2007.10854388","title":"Re-Covering The Limits Of Recognition: The Politics Of Difference And Decolonisation In John Borrows’ <i>Recovering Canada: The Resurgence of Indigenous Law</i>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Feminist Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Politics; Decolonization; Law; Political science; Relation (database); Critical appraisal; Biology; Medicine; Computer science; Data mining; Ecology","score_opus":0.062998829402604,"score_gpt":0.3147718153824303,"score_spread":0.25177298597982634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123647317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98906356,0.00023038842,0.0000032138448,0.0028466184,0.0002432778,0.0002141611,0.000027892533,0.0000029669936,0.0073679425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992407,0.00024156386,0.00006183383,0.00020789358,0.00012398156,0.0000028297684,7.1844477e-7,0.00000479279,0.00011569193],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983217,0.00020376538,0.00053972006,0.00009796594,0.0004917102,0.00034512513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982062,0.00094085163,0.00049867824,0.00011556809,0.00016866073,0.00007007284],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018007812,0.00010312094,0.00019894527,0.000015111426,0.0014192596,0.00005089095,0.0003382023,0.00006763709,0.000015924259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000303317,0.000057402805,0.000053534655,0.00020990413,0.0010676222,0.00009698554,0.000044996,0.00032340048,2.0207e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023161463,0.0002175737,0.3915743,0.00023384392,0.00034487297,0.000069447444,0.5006613,0.00021411855,0.002817981,0.08937472,0.0013802501,0.012879993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004627054,0.00015207667,0.7642703,0.00039705657,0.000094834584,0.00003599133,0.19464472,0.000003952274,0.01512115,0.0034261937,0.021111809,0.00027923498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6891294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.950306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.372696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002171218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002240385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123769923","doi":"","title":"Section 1, Constitutional Reasoning and Cultural Difference: Assessing the Impacts of Alberta v. Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Charter; Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Constitutionalism; Irony; Political science; Constitutional law; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Democracy","score_opus":0.021997061483145727,"score_gpt":0.33776435952085687,"score_spread":0.31576729803771114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123769923","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9731231,0.0000522012,0.00002338337,0.0022193198,0.0003653279,0.00015816292,0.000003004605,0.000014727535,0.0240408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855083,0.00003202818,0.00045953176,0.000038893453,0.00017652848,0.000004544158,0.0000024191309,0.0000018826591,0.00073333044],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991884,0.00010285746,0.00016914951,0.00011755016,0.00025373904,0.00016827461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922574,0.00031604763,0.00015551147,0.0000618528,0.00018388809,0.00005696016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034548697,0.00008372631,0.00015703464,0.000012837345,0.00076694577,0.00008665058,0.00010583791,0.00009957769,0.00009798594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077197765,0.000046393827,0.000041385618,0.00011743577,0.0023510465,0.0002811852,0.000051938023,0.00016532092,7.0200235e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020825863,0.00006128338,0.49926987,0.000038732873,0.00010545508,5.0906317e-7,0.100541785,0.0000025130366,0.20418747,0.19201638,0.0011636214,0.002591546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034503493,0.000038291466,0.9583104,0.00007524403,0.00004236974,0.0000052968735,0.032436747,0.00008113096,0.0035417096,0.00038051346,0.0045833075,0.00015991759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052746136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046868727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45904055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037980048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008185282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9705234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123809131","doi":"","title":"Two Roads Diverged: A Comparative Analysis of Indigenous Rights in a North American Constitutional Context","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Indigenous; Parliament; Context (archaeology); Politics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Indian country; Constitutional law; Political economy; Public administration; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.01784374753787008,"score_gpt":0.3090488353817329,"score_spread":0.2912050878438628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123809131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99579334,0.00081063784,0.00012923701,0.0003318601,0.00006158598,0.0002807236,0.000008492485,0.0000137519355,0.002570341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990524,0.00047969376,0.00005275398,0.0000454493,0.00008945864,0.000017877672,0.000005869031,0.0000018515613,0.000254655],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970988,0.00035736704,0.0003853213,0.0001775045,0.0005181897,0.0014627933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894494,0.00014859214,0.00037447867,0.00007029608,0.0003467584,0.00011493663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071819144,0.00014526346,0.0005373322,0.00023030578,0.0008755655,0.00005357014,0.0002940206,0.00003313102,0.00012282738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000068387635,0.000109186956,0.00020606566,0.0016504402,0.0017132411,0.00029807875,0.0000362887,0.00081346644,0.00003255376],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003269016,0.0001741511,0.68231785,0.0000010979745,0.0025372596,0.000003073278,0.07656119,0.00048419193,0.00002247189,0.2348567,0.000045920147,0.0029634093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011218461,0.00025563667,0.85712326,0.0000113595415,0.00048663272,0.0000072696357,0.12637532,0.00012664187,0.000015551796,0.012110533,0.0019840272,0.000381917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24778424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8708338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62304956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018723777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012865941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75722486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123819213","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1692895","title":"Liberté Contractuelle Et Relations Conjugales: Font-Elles Bon Ménage?","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Font; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.015527873445617435,"score_gpt":0.29696567317081246,"score_spread":0.281437799725195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123819213","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20039499,0.27811587,0.0021378638,0.42807183,0.002634154,0.0008325301,0.00002040441,0.00019013321,0.08760225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8142496,0.07490204,0.00019420292,0.001169215,0.0012214299,0.000005564317,0.000005317478,0.000024145982,0.108228505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933206,0.00083935936,0.000673721,0.00038675262,0.0007541445,0.0040254304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825263,0.0004496324,0.0004965661,0.00017659403,0.00031083223,0.00031376682],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003048483,0.00040884997,0.0005152443,0.000076183205,0.0025823552,0.00030159217,0.0005078935,0.00037779775,0.00045279737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056550506,0.00035980114,0.0004396188,0.00048084193,0.00060466,0.0010927636,0.000049553208,0.003879288,0.0005358147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004239452,0.00025671383,0.0009934715,0.000004980698,0.00034928077,0.000013411585,0.014340546,0.000110985224,0.00007274889,0.91814274,0.006548109,0.059124637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016673075,0.0007930242,0.009273313,0.00018318466,0.00033788368,0.0001809229,0.04805669,0.00014735167,0.000020651323,0.44434816,0.49424767,0.00074383494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002886594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017911905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6138546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034657235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002081944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123923553","doi":"","title":"Enforcing a Parent/Child Relationship at All Cost?: Supervised Access Orders in the Canadian Courts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Key (lock); Focus group; Component (thermodynamics); Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Social psychology; Political science; Computer security","score_opus":0.16740974870066885,"score_gpt":0.34736195174549017,"score_spread":0.17995220304482132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123923553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09435884,0.0003198866,0.000008778699,0.015093266,0.0004262129,0.0005248705,0.0000074837794,0.000029883986,0.8892308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99744445,0.00013512386,0.0001537824,0.0017966941,0.00021832278,0.000026498054,0.0000056674335,0.0000125235865,0.00020696603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975798,0.0005374302,0.00033230803,0.00018472385,0.00061203697,0.00075369945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893063,0.00022295304,0.00015374896,0.00014264486,0.00015657097,0.00039347803],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016530553,0.00016525945,0.00018501387,0.00006707222,0.0056573404,0.00047038466,0.00080743164,0.00014540157,0.0006653942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039476927,0.0001144605,0.000110914916,0.00022464186,0.00034180278,0.0006873602,0.00007287694,0.0006661774,0.00005720132],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031878244,0.000063441665,0.3305754,0.000008220283,0.0000786068,0.00013130107,0.21299355,0.0000836808,0.0000018833347,0.4512975,0.0041572363,0.000577307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020172065,0.00007578794,0.69045484,0.00021138851,0.00014713581,0.00012731236,0.0623733,0.000105582614,0.0000232324,0.041904863,0.20165226,0.00090711983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9721904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99929255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9030856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011751921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020073856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123992025","doi":"","title":"Meaningless mantra: substantive equality after Withler","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mantra; Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Section (typography); Context (archaeology); Substantive due process; Relevance (law); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09327847133984746,"score_gpt":0.3019885457289145,"score_spread":0.20871007438906702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123992025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6361338,0.0016576113,0.0012882618,0.00080014626,0.0008435977,0.0006847677,0.000036828744,0.00032694032,0.35822803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964315,0.00046071564,0.001764954,0.00012120029,0.00032244317,0.0000760437,0.000004134568,0.0000106206335,0.0008083846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981907,0.00024814915,0.00033299506,0.00040087572,0.00033183012,0.0004954549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906224,0.00013598547,0.00014473737,0.0002010085,0.00028803208,0.00016798358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000565028,0.0002248821,0.00031520546,0.000046316134,0.0012032959,0.00008417672,0.00030446096,0.00015820643,0.0006097624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032558278,0.00019301588,0.00015450701,0.00028258163,0.002094587,0.0004165058,0.000096804564,0.00019102881,0.00022267492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056507546,0.00012646546,0.025637439,0.000034960904,0.00011680737,0.00003995446,0.08202897,0.000005164645,0.000052392435,0.89122844,0.0001338168,0.00053910975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023960515,0.00018239331,0.27852872,0.0012238884,0.00061052316,0.000032937958,0.2612691,0.000050116367,0.0023197345,0.014691545,0.43552807,0.003166943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039726966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010693301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87653685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002577253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014920863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9254901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124002302","doi":"","title":"Sexual Assault Law, Credibility, and 'Ideal Victims': Consent, Resistance, and Victim Blaming","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Sexual assault; Psychology; Redress; Social psychology; Resistance (ecology); Criminology; Blame; Law; Political science; Poison control; Medicine; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.05438854300195671,"score_gpt":0.2733467632838719,"score_spread":0.2189582202819152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124002302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35087594,0.000014423097,0.000024078243,0.00044085,0.00012161131,0.0004599969,0.000021710464,0.00018647293,0.6478549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97339207,0.024161039,0.0016775823,0.00014811823,0.00012287735,0.0000030218994,0.000003796131,0.00001610147,0.00047538063],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980801,0.0003434711,0.00017295872,0.00054572267,0.00036830126,0.0004894501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900395,0.0002812676,0.00012669875,0.00018335583,0.00022489381,0.00017983087],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045874456,0.00023104413,0.00029034697,0.0008989488,0.0015017091,0.000095713134,0.00025045683,0.00020286371,0.00003966836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024181361,0.00022880295,0.000053395375,0.0018881833,0.0012848258,0.000624751,0.0003292758,0.00026603814,0.0000074423942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005764666,0.0003995733,0.06297059,0.00027849144,0.00051161565,0.00038284055,0.8132748,6.494205e-7,0.00005942335,0.11241204,0.0018377949,0.007295678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072378025,0.00007165671,0.00530681,0.00003300126,0.00009341908,0.0000023640525,0.05058313,0.000009249019,0.00004545697,0.00001567558,0.9427919,0.00032355668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4605518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.581933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9409541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028361432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022365934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124132668","doi":"","title":"BANKRUPTCY, PROVINCIAL LAW, AND THE FAMILY FARM","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Bankruptcy; Insolvency; Statute; Family law; Reform Act; Political science; Estate; Damages; Legislative intent; Legislature","score_opus":0.030563315560485724,"score_gpt":0.2828547792924247,"score_spread":0.25229146373193895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124132668","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060046697,0.21235082,4.182175e-7,0.41416675,0.00025683764,0.0036270865,0.000013830948,0.000044737182,0.36353487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8296604,0.081539705,0.000036281657,0.083194174,0.000557872,0.0003951703,0.0000026945797,0.000016108252,0.004597562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986454,0.0004494906,0.0001621253,0.00013507898,0.00023686756,0.00037104095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930173,0.0001347278,0.00005888835,0.00017699979,0.00011183432,0.00021583246],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010817187,0.00011020895,0.00023547148,0.0000071757786,0.0023947044,0.00017279413,0.00039285232,0.000046798228,0.0002994013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040624358,0.000049977672,0.000078103105,0.00013625076,0.0014071241,0.0000920907,0.000049722308,0.00015853548,0.00045204026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001512696,0.0000033650322,0.00012968652,0.00016855478,0.00004588235,0.0000021259302,0.01213433,7.916258e-8,0.0000019997262,0.838491,0.07974526,0.069276206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113841656,0.0000047427206,0.0028724293,0.00015860332,0.00004527206,7.5526464e-7,0.0009893464,0.0000016571092,2.3011698e-7,0.001308169,0.9944104,0.00009452916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9646568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9710135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91466516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024501333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002579285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99890405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124152775","doi":"","title":"A Situational Approach to Incapacity and Mental Disability in Sexual Assault Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Psychology; Situational ethics; Context (archaeology); Law; Criminology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.029766024349389703,"score_gpt":0.2912765160196001,"score_spread":0.2615104916702104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124152775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9452514,0.000063480955,0.000008081704,0.0047942935,0.00010680945,0.0008564365,0.000023093486,0.00006277086,0.048833646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961727,0.0000052697774,0.0019083003,0.00085428776,0.00022045629,0.0001981341,0.000013969523,0.000007162315,0.0006196864],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980747,0.00028242273,0.00024048539,0.00039682642,0.0006043989,0.0004011703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926364,0.00014159412,0.000047749105,0.00013518176,0.000106429965,0.0003053866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006949519,0.00015650626,0.00022157446,0.000011777202,0.00085771084,0.00020994752,0.0002029582,0.00013596182,0.00033927994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031374476,0.00013208657,0.000038005455,0.00017935442,0.0009401981,0.0006809179,0.00016608264,0.00027243278,0.00024762627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035437155,0.0008061908,0.51493776,0.000052784013,0.000070296825,0.0000012258989,0.06287278,0.000035249457,0.0010674854,0.41031307,0.007180363,0.0026273574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011079733,0.00008633272,0.87623906,0.000021266222,0.000014748248,0.0000017473191,0.054308183,0.00018020137,0.00007019537,0.008459568,0.058818206,0.0006925111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25277326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.159993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4018535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047114515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030107858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85533494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124243876","doi":"","title":"An Exemption for Sincere Believers: The Challenge of Alberta versus Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Sincerity; Context (archaeology); Charter; Test (biology); Government (linguistics); Civil procedure; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.04701251184942391,"score_gpt":0.3193123188179845,"score_spread":0.2722998069685606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124243876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798558,0.0025783838,0.00024628208,0.0069318055,0.0006511359,0.0006740819,0.000008321534,0.000020696278,0.0090335235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961122,0.002917801,0.00011689776,0.000016667287,0.00031588774,0.00001313194,0.0000019487727,0.000009848924,0.00049559143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810094,0.00020506921,0.00026588846,0.00013868202,0.00029611142,0.0009933363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990836,0.00017912677,0.0003377866,0.00012350515,0.00021626722,0.000059755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015893742,0.0001111471,0.00020704303,0.000024871735,0.0006583811,0.00001831119,0.00042759578,0.000105646104,0.00006863369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018143968,0.00007505335,0.00013648166,0.00010496725,0.00034814363,0.00029385983,0.000026042415,0.00041430624,0.0000025768318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018908218,0.00043756218,0.0032746326,0.00003843409,0.0008692491,5.5987084e-7,0.28612515,0.000008446678,0.0012853578,0.6668024,0.00037570085,0.038891677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009975186,0.013018208,0.023318265,0.00021545486,0.00086281484,0.00001464331,0.5723558,0.00009905323,0.0020882245,0.32791552,0.048966657,0.0011701767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017328769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18769236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3388869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005560226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054558367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124342262","doi":"","title":"Cohabitation, Female Sacrifice, and Judge-Made Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Doctrine; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Family law; Diversity (politics); Sign (mathematics); Joint venture; Sociology; Economics; Law; Political science; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.01631193196255434,"score_gpt":0.3038730338164975,"score_spread":0.2875611018539432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124342262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91442925,0.00610671,0.00036236437,0.012929778,0.0006251375,0.00026922807,0.0000025313193,0.00009695846,0.06517803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99020547,0.0030707272,0.00017782024,0.0003314444,0.001180274,0.000004577736,7.636136e-7,0.000009834893,0.0050190906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750984,0.00017992283,0.00018837713,0.0001722302,0.00035016602,0.0015994756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993343,0.00008911127,0.00011184786,0.00006559551,0.00027601406,0.00012314059],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016633336,0.00011296176,0.00014625792,0.000027269798,0.0025514876,0.00015663072,0.00019006596,0.000081814396,0.00007262036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024359964,0.000090983325,0.000056760808,0.00016958118,0.0008250012,0.00035993053,0.000032640542,0.00067779847,0.00009847881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000171109,0.000023685232,0.0037071644,0.0000026666928,0.00009408892,0.0000010013241,0.0223044,4.3229946e-7,0.0002525435,0.9671723,0.00083519664,0.005589361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011837344,0.00060580135,0.016905133,0.000038054968,0.00010641461,0.000071959446,0.18948884,0.000012842379,0.00023820646,0.34759173,0.4431753,0.0005819978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002866446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048075408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6195806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069861533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005158269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99874705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124358061","doi":"","title":"Charter Eviction: Litigating Out of House and Home","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Appeal; Eviction; Political science; Law; Justiciability; Politics","score_opus":0.04433295916700379,"score_gpt":0.30364303676954574,"score_spread":0.25931007760254193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124358061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9646477,0.0012180965,0.000008440809,0.0035893277,0.0006838374,0.00025006043,0.000008037296,0.00018797233,0.02940652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964208,0.00008974755,0.00053722627,0.0002810617,0.0006227583,0.000016526581,0.0000010757825,0.000011884083,0.0020189036],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880517,0.00013819254,0.00020413104,0.00019208442,0.00039287997,0.00026752593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922997,0.0000806899,0.00010116996,0.00011670191,0.00019926223,0.00027217955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052186387,0.000107613414,0.0002098358,0.000013888453,0.00045739178,0.00008994983,0.00013261025,0.00008773296,0.000087427004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036240887,0.0000895815,0.00005159372,0.000104487845,0.00044980398,0.00039703448,0.000077062905,0.00014254854,0.00015038812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008528423,0.00024109076,0.271395,0.00020544119,0.00033410577,0.00002424134,0.46603417,0.000020199801,0.0026353493,0.2160124,0.03419016,0.0088225575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002267083,0.00027155486,0.070319645,0.00026396074,0.00009952988,0.0000028418965,0.08376142,0.00003588981,0.0012222095,0.00794977,0.83289695,0.00090917246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008012618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006481754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79870677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107179745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000450239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124484187","doi":"","title":"Take My Breath Away: Competing Contexts Between Domestic Violence, Kink and The Criminal Justice System in <em>R. v. J.A.</em>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Criminology; Domestic violence; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law; Medical emergency; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.1815345443461385,"score_gpt":0.5164602354876578,"score_spread":0.3349256911415194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124484187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9754629,0.015882855,0.00010058424,0.00079680415,0.00054333475,0.0010020268,0.00004269608,0.0000621978,0.0061065676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98994774,0.008884207,0.00008964565,0.00014635288,0.0005836272,0.00006660025,0.0000015206733,0.000027436632,0.00025284404],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99520826,0.0014675166,0.0010161862,0.0005144354,0.0010870883,0.0007065024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940023,0.0039497986,0.0009773294,0.0002883018,0.00046363185,0.00031866314],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004618406,0.0003747928,0.0011410129,0.00025432574,0.0016229191,0.0014134487,0.002256986,0.00016001036,0.00054304634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023130935,0.00021107086,0.00017938907,0.00074650004,0.001222152,0.0016782953,0.0009144344,0.00042788134,0.000022208873],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044617584,0.00012780359,0.8305919,0.0005519635,0.00040236927,0.000116735355,0.04035556,0.00001856312,0.0013303867,0.007040294,0.0020836713,0.116934545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022228556,0.000010508369,0.95234483,0.0036821547,0.0005894527,0.000011920522,0.036220208,0.000013884822,0.00016478797,0.0013492283,0.002913219,0.0004769563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009094831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019667984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121752895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043199104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014634622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124569377","doi":"","title":"Draft Provincial/Territorial Legislation to Implement a Regulatory Framework for Medically-Assisted Dying Consistent with Carter v. Canada (Attorney General) 2015 SCC 5 and the Final Report of the Provincial-Territorial Expert Advisory Group on Physician-","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Supreme court; Assisted suicide; Political science; Charter; Government (linguistics); Declaration; Medicine","score_opus":0.03715265987870416,"score_gpt":0.31907066024407077,"score_spread":0.28191800036536663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124569377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84570724,0.0022303425,0.0016324134,0.06623038,0.050923735,0.01797105,0.00025159196,0.00029674076,0.014756512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767878,0.000007114285,0.0015046038,0.00069031323,0.019016672,0.00087461015,0.000021772663,0.00004119579,0.0010559226],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99594116,0.0006414767,0.0007178686,0.00059494196,0.0014989502,0.00060562475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972027,0.00057082507,0.0005250452,0.0004746627,0.0008795921,0.000347191],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001704968,0.00036326773,0.00060172606,0.00003497714,0.0013512195,0.0001309058,0.00047311964,0.00021726031,0.0000068173395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016280146,0.00020838795,0.00016458795,0.00026395114,0.0008259829,0.00018320573,0.00023070458,0.00031335113,0.0000017512128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005407459,0.00087186263,0.006146015,0.0002404699,0.0010338203,0.00004107062,0.26667398,0.00004475987,0.0011594506,0.17941043,0.51762563,0.021345062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00531882,0.00049889355,0.008294547,0.0004160859,0.0002209645,0.0000054741326,0.01069435,0.00009986297,0.00036400108,0.0008094634,0.9726354,0.0006421281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38824454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8254105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45500982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014741564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002899915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124598818","doi":"","title":"The Forgotten Right: Section 9 of The Charter, Its Purpose and Meaning","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Charter; Supreme court; Section (typography); Constitutional right; Framing (construction); State (computer science); Political science; Meaning (existential); Original meaning; Sociology; Law and economics; History; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032436442371785404,"score_gpt":0.2770326792193331,"score_spread":0.24459623684754772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124598818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.864699,0.00035966895,0.000005924876,0.008552048,0.00043771518,0.00032079534,8.477889e-7,0.000039685114,0.12558432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876864,0.0003990322,0.000024402865,0.00007664347,0.00016097575,0.000008380026,8.118074e-8,0.0000022972183,0.011641796],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993582,0.000091019436,0.00009469679,0.00008066473,0.00022936576,0.00014605357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996623,0.00011162846,0.000056022105,0.000060454262,0.0000825842,0.0000270096],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022784827,0.00005084038,0.000069106805,0.000004845631,0.002724784,0.000023805736,0.00012871526,0.0000364438,0.000033154472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015541453,0.000021291495,0.000040710347,0.000111877656,0.0003812574,0.00012105965,0.000044364435,0.00006721979,0.000004660792],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003253843,0.000089728965,0.088506036,0.000029911105,0.0002119498,0.000003642693,0.5955387,0.000006961823,0.0060403743,0.26566344,0.029808108,0.014068644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005967401,0.000068745125,0.31613243,0.000033664186,0.00004432341,0.000008874928,0.055203445,0.00013441751,0.0064042145,0.0025470112,0.6185226,0.00030352888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021425113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067378674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5887145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036961075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014319494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124668454","doi":"","title":"Competence Concerns in Charter Adjudication: Countering the Anti-Poverty Incompetence Argument","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Adjudication; Competence (human resources); Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law and economics; Poverty; Law; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.013681653245047724,"score_gpt":0.2786062817851604,"score_spread":0.26492462854011267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124668454","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9388938,0.0069942963,0.00090438005,0.037672535,0.0008455913,0.00056541886,0.0000043437167,0.00008069808,0.014038934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936338,0.0042587547,0.00004056097,0.00033737396,0.0008956538,0.000016305905,0.0000013154955,0.000007747564,0.00080848346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970678,0.00022155723,0.00031988064,0.00019402217,0.00054819725,0.0016485149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942034,0.00010296961,0.00019684235,0.000113644295,0.000116707,0.000049487073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017851808,0.00014007128,0.00018798037,0.00003240349,0.0012096548,0.00014143628,0.00051467255,0.000057274636,0.00006386578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006423863,0.00009243082,0.0000808901,0.0002584852,0.00034288666,0.0003254018,0.00006264446,0.001022182,0.000046076235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035657235,0.00020345412,0.15356523,0.0000109231105,0.0001561195,0.000011644777,0.019672278,0.00036836718,0.0012932876,0.8150634,0.0018449283,0.0077746776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023915772,0.0002570297,0.5422488,0.00024021615,0.000078083474,0.00012211448,0.103790626,0.0005807914,0.00015400992,0.13693824,0.21213378,0.0010647273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009996934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05396262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6781252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021335683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007080792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99659556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W312471071","doi":"","title":"Viscount Haldane: 'The Wicked Step-Father of the Canadian Constitution'","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Genealogy; History; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07270786214310568,"score_gpt":0.28891590494566244,"score_spread":0.21620804280255676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W312471071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5324074,0.06831248,0.0000041075286,0.043948516,0.004945671,0.0011775348,0.00020858139,0.000022053599,0.34897366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951836,0.0025070151,0.00012690522,0.0007098992,0.00028395778,0.0000057456687,1.8803064e-7,0.0000066128628,0.001176104],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982184,0.00025805575,0.00041064317,0.00010566073,0.00052453874,0.00048266433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979863,0.000104260085,0.00032268692,0.00010952623,0.0010909898,0.00038620198],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010264101,0.00011941326,0.00031444442,0.0001293709,0.0031790272,0.000078724894,0.00056930067,0.00008092097,0.00016065068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012211055,0.000080370824,0.00018047568,0.0005154719,0.003784936,0.00019868597,0.00003994217,0.0003027656,0.000008405341],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027446582,0.00007404659,0.059030797,0.000057895442,0.0028566008,0.000905497,0.35292798,0.000015358451,0.00002023801,0.10634196,0.45354372,0.024198472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032145553,0.000034241177,0.14859974,0.00031874212,0.00014988743,0.00017013555,0.126593,4.1251306e-7,0.00002539834,0.0006094834,0.72298384,0.00019367407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46277618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010013646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024912355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124744549","doi":"","title":"Bedford, Substantive Rationality, and Participatory Democracy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Supreme court; Legislation; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Democracy; Substantive due process; Proportionality (law); Arbitrariness; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.14809269231020933,"score_gpt":0.3561527374694569,"score_spread":0.2080600451592476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124744549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9252752,0.0035610916,0.0006986262,0.012115682,0.0006218874,0.0006153915,0.000026474894,0.00020931527,0.05687631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99745023,0.0004738021,0.0010370108,0.00013590477,0.00033608364,0.000032415253,0.000008270566,0.0000052629157,0.0005210027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987028,0.00020732902,0.00023657642,0.00025390257,0.00030385584,0.00029550475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989992,0.00023583559,0.00009551515,0.000102377155,0.00031713123,0.0002499677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067948014,0.00013583519,0.00020911518,0.00003230192,0.0012703004,0.0001142185,0.00013627947,0.00009198767,0.000050789447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011443221,0.00012201222,0.000054647666,0.00018793713,0.0017703623,0.00040914473,0.00008443744,0.000108825356,0.00006841177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013794668,0.000045374174,0.04785086,0.0000142225945,0.00004883835,0.000008478656,0.018769346,0.000049985592,0.000040174753,0.9316727,0.0009892066,0.00049699744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002235936,0.00010604872,0.06200072,0.00028255992,0.000254726,0.000024186496,0.13857433,0.00032436047,0.00030641214,0.05186423,0.7427824,0.0012440972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012194846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041389707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8798085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023233674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035408966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97702515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124782918","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2005.11427598","title":"Same-Sex Marriage in Canada: Contributions from the Courts, the Executive and Parliament","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"King s Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Law; Executive power; Politics","score_opus":0.01852019212539352,"score_gpt":0.2783188882033739,"score_spread":0.2597986960779804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124782918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7479319,0.0058519216,0.000035208748,0.23237711,0.0006399958,0.00040401868,0.00009149792,0.000016809841,0.012651527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99670374,0.0005551638,0.000066900124,0.0017645555,0.00075251143,0.000007250622,9.137418e-7,0.0000032306064,0.00014575526],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987034,0.000331057,0.00018363664,0.00009363394,0.00038293944,0.0003053288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990652,0.00060856517,0.0001088396,0.00006165281,0.000073533214,0.000082210034],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007724723,0.00008132297,0.00012713073,0.000004568539,0.003015248,0.00018916163,0.00021383753,0.000032833403,0.000094974566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024573275,0.000041554133,0.000034182125,0.00006079598,0.00031970066,0.00012296108,0.000053723914,0.0003744009,0.0000025067272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053617783,0.00010720096,0.23778783,0.000003413167,0.0005842211,0.00011417233,0.33524027,0.00051899377,0.00013425923,0.2767273,0.10888308,0.039845657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000474718,0.000007027006,0.16486387,0.000053360716,0.00003579032,0.0000059815516,0.09770282,0.00006058152,0.00003307086,0.00279953,0.7338302,0.00013302645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98413557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99825674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62494713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013666417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000262398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124802196","doi":"","title":"Substantive Equality As Equal Recognition: A New Theory of Section 15 of the Charter","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.13256272786081788,"score_gpt":0.34198915064985225,"score_spread":0.20942642278903437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124802196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31876686,0.00070440216,0.000482237,0.0034433722,0.0017349165,0.0003247833,0.000021793148,0.000030925177,0.6744907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977486,0.00007057804,0.00016111911,0.00013489684,0.0008592473,0.0000021723863,9.491158e-7,0.0000064503874,0.0010159459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762374,0.0009716302,0.00035313325,0.00010261447,0.00071497704,0.00023391753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850315,0.0001785457,0.00044564818,0.000100060985,0.00059843704,0.00017415186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021459376,0.00010454054,0.00022182522,0.000016408581,0.0006765344,0.000050225597,0.00025233827,0.000111205445,0.00038156446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005726384,0.00006577954,0.00017695915,0.00018572381,0.0005324419,0.0003326783,0.00005790422,0.00031453068,0.00002451502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026680258,0.00015220705,0.0021752636,0.000017369812,0.0002314595,0.000003305936,0.16505878,0.000008258706,0.00089889206,0.8185731,0.002514857,0.010099678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019631411,0.00032539485,0.007990025,0.0002546751,0.0001841948,0.00003938748,0.1489956,0.0000036992328,0.0061954423,0.8182108,0.015480338,0.000357326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05591291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.083229475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6789818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017345214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019611325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9503738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124809449","doi":"","title":"Adding Social Condition to the Canadian Human Rights Act","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Charter; Political science; Disadvantage; Fundamental rights; Cultural rights; Social rights; International human rights law; Law; Social equality; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03630720792482259,"score_gpt":0.3577099511207186,"score_spread":0.321402743195896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124809449","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1047423,0.00019307861,0.000004085655,0.030644353,0.00069493114,0.0007681824,0.000026360005,0.00020424275,0.86272246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98796135,0.0000027840892,0.000053407843,0.000783099,0.0025297613,0.000039906135,0.000020427984,0.000010092188,0.008599196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799585,0.00028437682,0.00023324136,0.0003232928,0.00038863593,0.0007746166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897665,0.0000974372,0.00007577697,0.00015484197,0.0002878362,0.00040745104],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006056091,0.00020950037,0.00023774443,0.000077530894,0.015240173,0.00031814555,0.00052946125,0.00019190679,0.0005851371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001710262,0.00015074303,0.00013988167,0.00053693913,0.00032665374,0.00025672727,0.000045794175,0.0002929967,0.0016458782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007657791,0.000082536,0.00043852182,0.000005722242,0.00006888228,0.000008740132,0.15621461,0.0000037120956,0.00021860137,0.5454713,0.28778684,0.009692884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016971692,0.000038200895,0.040021285,0.000017741544,0.00002576841,3.9414482e-7,0.0016344362,0.0000030941883,0.0000818165,0.0020119557,0.9557415,0.00025406602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3014612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.883219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001160186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016065287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99913144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124959456","doi":"","title":"A v B and Attorney General of Quebec (Eric v Lola) —The Implications for Cohabiting Couples Outside Quebec","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Supreme court; Legislature; Law; Order (exchange); Sociology; Poverty; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.05099248566382994,"score_gpt":0.30064280178728814,"score_spread":0.2496503161234582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124959456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9655862,0.0019224175,0.0004310326,0.02273377,0.00037510012,0.00035913504,0.00005916204,0.0000091121665,0.008524071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970377,0.000054933174,0.0008084188,0.0008390215,0.00052910595,0.00000868846,0.0000015014027,0.000008254693,0.00071238005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903923,0.00010826352,0.00031638023,0.00009503619,0.00013537909,0.00030573324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846095,0.00037674306,0.00028693915,0.0000858775,0.0004363362,0.000353177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006691625,0.00009180714,0.000227792,0.000037355705,0.0010922395,0.00010943785,0.00025385572,0.000063122585,0.0000057599855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053058285,0.00006613757,0.00010401211,0.000118086034,0.00087894103,0.00016463496,0.000012092892,0.0001150288,9.4393835e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013556456,0.000012221465,0.046683304,0.000047978705,0.00016717133,0.000001959409,0.024485767,0.0001201145,0.0023301926,0.8893806,0.019540152,0.017216984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004087334,0.000056427874,0.37729806,0.000074314536,0.000075930075,0.0000037957834,0.0098577095,0.000041178355,0.00004546332,0.0022245378,0.6097415,0.00017235837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86758876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9876259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88715607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030492936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072637683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8400734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125003764","doi":"","title":"Legal Rights in the Supreme Court of Canada in 2000: Seeing the Big Picture","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Human rights; Political science; Context (archaeology); Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Linguistic rights; Right to property; History","score_opus":0.017563461483308174,"score_gpt":0.26078445572653575,"score_spread":0.24322099424322757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125003764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8874415,0.0007517039,0.0000010934918,0.015414187,0.0003920943,0.00043246246,0.000008685466,0.000018556391,0.095539674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99566555,0.000051180974,0.000026307938,0.0010844686,0.0003753524,0.000026233209,0.0000018008844,0.000005160636,0.0027639573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782586,0.00044783414,0.00029018792,0.00020068229,0.00072577957,0.0005096469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920845,0.00032421423,0.00009233169,0.00021199326,0.000082910534,0.000080103164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094939856,0.00014689357,0.00022257096,0.00001978281,0.0008953856,0.00008892894,0.0006276208,0.00009487272,0.00017371043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024936403,0.00007756972,0.000059806167,0.0005082611,0.00034391624,0.00019013249,0.00005823805,0.0004480656,0.0000099333665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013110942,0.00034245496,0.26803628,0.000056937835,0.00017085778,0.00048917794,0.19418447,0.0013950771,0.00040092884,0.44439897,0.0887527,0.0016410681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033190675,0.000012783281,0.08413543,0.000042633335,0.0000096606045,0.0000021387837,0.013974277,0.000014061254,0.000057109974,0.0010657161,0.90019286,0.00016142668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98122835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81144017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051620073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040554855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68866724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125049935","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1036","title":"Harsh, Perhaps Even Misguided: Developments in Law, 2002","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Plaintiff; Charter; Political science; Limelight; Sociology; Law and economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.06384175180557475,"score_gpt":0.3442274930813688,"score_spread":0.2803857412757941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125049935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024098514,0.23618162,0.0000054590287,0.009001378,0.0006230618,0.0019147572,0.000011394016,0.00013757133,0.7497149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6226425,0.32007793,0.0054917224,0.021909403,0.0003600993,0.0005616594,0.000026523903,0.00008315447,0.028846968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971604,0.00061233935,0.0005494759,0.00037739598,0.00066561764,0.00063476944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914473,0.00011286255,0.00012798353,0.00021884452,0.00021775097,0.00017784756],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017579301,0.00024100038,0.00055459444,0.000017311373,0.00072648184,0.000068125315,0.00038783214,0.00011312242,0.002029237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008074913,0.00019795954,0.00014690268,0.0003807289,0.00046504644,0.0003377426,0.00006928572,0.00021350851,0.0008791283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036677222,0.00015683737,0.003588793,0.001006307,0.00010229235,0.00003147468,0.0074811536,0.0000011776503,0.000037840164,0.9013221,0.08243206,0.003836271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020927562,0.000007824711,0.0006682069,0.0014680488,0.000032694486,0.0000014643176,0.00038094184,2.384654e-7,0.00002511811,0.00049951347,0.9964232,0.0002835177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075809746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02186101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9139911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043379836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014001595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125063584","doi":"","title":"Re)Examining Feminism and Justice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Feminism; Law; Counterpoint; Law enforcement; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.05745934905511848,"score_gpt":0.3113638327382411,"score_spread":0.25390448368312263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125063584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74743086,0.008093937,0.00048304952,0.002523286,0.0007805926,0.00021064126,0.0000010282012,0.000109065644,0.24036755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98561203,0.009686401,0.0003407039,0.00012384381,0.00055947027,0.0000032537127,2.036457e-7,0.000009378718,0.0036646954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975341,0.00015314807,0.00017189993,0.00015294761,0.00028208556,0.0017058114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995071,0.000100919126,0.00011790795,0.000058891124,0.000089386005,0.00012576499],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001992828,0.00010943978,0.00014171799,0.000031081458,0.0015360825,0.0000657023,0.00020522405,0.00008374731,0.000090120266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033881876,0.000087541586,0.000041564614,0.000118496115,0.00025366736,0.00026009927,0.000050467384,0.00097612094,0.000027700058],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004342408,0.00006483094,0.014431805,0.000012202317,0.00026642263,0.000015077908,0.23819573,6.322974e-7,0.0001179179,0.6972295,0.0005324774,0.049089964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007030699,0.00038035723,0.0177596,0.000038437138,0.00024964163,0.00006113058,0.81502616,0.000007214667,0.000049697002,0.1421717,0.023118205,0.00043479438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019417091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009960865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5768304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005688676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051211537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125224730","doi":"10.22145/flr.41.1.6","title":"Considering Canadian Approaches to Equality in the Context of Constitutional Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Law; Project commissioning; High Court; Political science; Publishing; Racism; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.16254608544722277,"score_gpt":0.33825860967231586,"score_spread":0.1757125242250931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125224730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80291206,0.0386316,0.000020238896,0.045956176,0.0001778875,0.0036718477,0.00021134451,0.000022305816,0.10839655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954643,0.002858806,0.00023934167,0.0012902826,0.000033345186,0.000087287655,0.0000070414044,0.0000014474266,0.000018117416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990149,0.000262056,0.00025647867,0.00011173418,0.00018770718,0.00016713084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946314,0.00023288881,0.00007909945,0.000050069495,0.000099362325,0.00007544716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005893119,0.00007630609,0.00025532738,0.000012283695,0.00030851716,0.000042452302,0.00008667829,0.000035501755,0.00021915234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023855305,0.000049756844,0.00004153553,0.000091378155,0.00068054855,0.0001466685,0.000011656457,0.0000669363,0.00000846738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002976663,0.000026014624,0.010980208,0.00088776724,0.000028646798,7.8165124e-7,0.016903093,6.0868587e-7,0.000012500638,0.9625339,0.001724172,0.0068993317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010918013,0.0001636178,0.20211133,0.009429612,0.00016495424,0.00001471398,0.09588222,0.0000082258875,0.0001410718,0.011912348,0.6780894,0.0009907143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6579938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82803637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95062155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006332877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018526881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34428367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125264773","doi":"","title":"Book Review: The Best Interests of Children – An Evidence Based Approach, by Paul Millar","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Best interests; Best practice; Child custody; Law; Psychology; Field (mathematics); Law and economics; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.0625249847080316,"score_gpt":0.2801570086249995,"score_spread":0.2176320239169679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125264773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8545062,0.1334227,0.00004522976,0.006350819,0.0001272643,0.0013602257,0.000109927394,0.00008773843,0.003989911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752655,0.018419573,0.0007798719,0.0022931672,0.00006763313,0.0000025161044,0.00003503246,0.00002068556,0.0031159976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699706,0.0010043819,0.0002702304,0.00046337297,0.0008275507,0.00043743214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817884,0.0002079094,0.00044190596,0.00054798985,0.0003849512,0.00023841497],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016296824,0.00024204995,0.0004662059,0.0000645721,0.0013163434,0.00002440356,0.0016447833,0.00021381404,0.0010458776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005881652,0.00020528343,0.00028683522,0.00047693096,0.0015463114,0.001534942,0.00032529054,0.00040301695,0.00006559222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077075395,0.0017845407,0.5641351,0.0011276373,0.00086462044,0.000026158596,0.12082103,0.000009668813,0.0035455513,0.000603961,0.30083784,0.005473156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024328756,0.0010064379,0.68880606,0.004741284,0.0013573845,0.000008800647,0.048356447,0.00003103189,0.0040483586,0.0001406578,0.24731456,0.0017560802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006027735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012109088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.124671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018159684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000100362224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125564700","doi":"","title":"Feminist Statutory Interpretation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Legislation; Doctrine; Law; Scholarship; Sociology; Power (physics); Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009597327491365826,"score_gpt":0.29312935903935594,"score_spread":0.2835320315479901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125564700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.852015,0.0029418871,0.0004265568,0.0035115953,0.0012297742,0.0003216159,0.0000018492633,0.00009342415,0.13945827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98132825,0.0017836302,0.000046794263,0.00016117767,0.0003385882,0.0000033966435,0.0000010276336,0.000008759698,0.01632836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976052,0.00017065021,0.00017440686,0.00013336874,0.0003826805,0.0015336877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955827,0.000081135615,0.00012789157,0.0000659269,0.00009117861,0.00007557091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015728032,0.00009385641,0.0001315792,0.000033071123,0.00065469154,0.00010563561,0.00023489646,0.00006620565,0.00018038259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001625995,0.000076347555,0.00009576838,0.00012361226,0.00012452748,0.00022692533,0.000027980584,0.0009789412,0.00036828258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077973134,0.000055018478,0.0221794,0.000007750015,0.0002353009,0.0000021345895,0.054700833,0.000021620019,0.00031472804,0.8693325,0.0009324616,0.052140284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011672776,0.0004868896,0.008750519,0.00006208648,0.00006503392,0.000039316095,0.34693816,0.0000800415,0.000050973922,0.12512237,0.51664966,0.00058764085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000988722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052555953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7442101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020477795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012172405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5354872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125683914","doi":"","title":"The Liability of Churches for the Historical Sexual Assault of Children by Priests","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Law; Supreme court; Liability; Damages; Political science; Meaning (existential); Test (biology); Tort; Psychology","score_opus":0.01356057908044708,"score_gpt":0.2825025342638002,"score_spread":0.2689419551833531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125683914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.944765,0.019643106,0.0025377774,0.030493602,0.0005209481,0.0008694142,0.000011286055,0.000029905234,0.0011290101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949708,0.0017983175,0.00003753993,0.000020615298,0.0003956512,0.000013784626,7.036277e-7,0.0000066666876,0.0027559334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997642,0.0003430915,0.00031466037,0.00012125666,0.00052849675,0.0010505203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979463,0.0012748614,0.00029772136,0.00013224458,0.000299707,0.00004915975],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006359628,0.000098625605,0.00020294162,0.0000088678,0.0015544789,0.000031015512,0.0005436298,0.00008696063,0.000004600785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024779,0.00004861349,0.00013557432,0.0001183034,0.000574089,0.00008586601,0.000040987394,0.00073845685,8.059375e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032293418,0.00044843118,0.13351366,0.00002917791,0.0012376598,4.833515e-8,0.03251008,0.00003229718,0.0015249824,0.52234036,0.025671815,0.28236857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002417664,0.0026520458,0.118744,0.000028290995,0.0004306109,0.000014162915,0.058531657,0.00013436131,0.0009038952,0.17660253,0.6388662,0.0006746069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00541875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009917883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61319435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015080058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064094836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125688282","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1303","title":"Law, Politics and Legacy Building at the McLachlin Court in 2014","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Trilogy; Law; Politics; Political science; Charter; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.07072506130949477,"score_gpt":0.3600675183671795,"score_spread":0.2893424570576847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125688282","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04465578,0.6200181,0.000017865046,0.17878672,0.0009221451,0.0025827275,0.000029741517,0.00018227936,0.1528046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89990956,0.08789722,0.00039422215,0.008710337,0.00048519287,0.000083431405,0.000007711997,0.000025639605,0.0024866655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770796,0.00052560115,0.00036844902,0.00028699462,0.00057841284,0.0005325993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989115,0.0002812897,0.00011528442,0.00024420014,0.00021676988,0.00023095691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023654178,0.00019285044,0.00044234504,0.000010811088,0.0009065989,0.00013472066,0.00034003222,0.00008979086,0.00013710542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061353226,0.00012415546,0.000094638766,0.00017177896,0.0010021816,0.00037741766,0.00025370895,0.00022008976,0.00014946685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003871031,0.000033702876,0.0023543837,0.00039635302,0.000035566514,0.000008580354,0.005360132,0.000002042099,0.000016861379,0.9049053,0.08604157,0.0008416477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021232049,0.000014710575,0.00031255497,0.0006919812,0.000057084664,0.0000028693767,0.0011282676,0.0000054373304,0.000012234889,0.0025424447,0.9948317,0.00018839815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039450295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04825537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9087901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004785029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000830763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9691115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125751861","doi":"","title":"Between Exclusion and Assimilation: Experimentalizing Multiculturalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Multiculturalism; Reasonable accommodation; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Charter; Democracy; Law; Law and economics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028144978977897868,"score_gpt":0.33536194300898814,"score_spread":0.3072169640310903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125751861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96659833,0.006472626,0.00018203235,0.018743288,0.00018074467,0.00023558932,0.0000010801217,0.00008709197,0.0074992185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99297565,0.004550558,0.00020353998,0.0001669524,0.0009647065,0.000001996418,0.0000023335679,0.00000565209,0.0011286141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768114,0.000160836,0.00021327611,0.00016881234,0.00040421978,0.0013717262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954385,0.00005872179,0.0001253226,0.000051302646,0.00008969723,0.00013112315],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010322417,0.00013476746,0.0001727192,0.000032468484,0.0021702594,0.000151407,0.00015686259,0.00009953054,0.000026017144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011914078,0.00010056299,0.00007229757,0.00013213253,0.0001336047,0.00045980248,0.000027716284,0.00072885235,0.00000865305],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007651147,0.00018419899,0.035427395,0.000008937891,0.00048101443,0.000015020271,0.30879134,0.000019718953,0.013984059,0.3665656,0.0018889819,0.27255723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003938637,0.00094306807,0.2222863,0.00017082755,0.00025519857,0.00013214277,0.49904466,0.000045266315,0.001991951,0.16910493,0.10040483,0.001682197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062801735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008799107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27087504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012579323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018793168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125797368","doi":"","title":"An Eye for an Eye: Proportionality as a Moral Principle of Punishment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Retributive justice; Punishment (psychology); Imprisonment; Criminal law; Law; Relevance (law); Morality; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Social psychology; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.04405367806710336,"score_gpt":0.3764380836767383,"score_spread":0.33238440560963495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125797368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99544317,0.00050065824,0.0002938938,0.0021568204,0.00012777692,0.00049132586,0.000006846815,0.000039395156,0.0009401417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960213,0.0009717343,0.0004990661,0.000054611566,0.00051836827,0.000030652816,0.000008449618,0.000011322671,0.0018844949],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997032,0.00022819632,0.0003596369,0.00021316475,0.00066109997,0.001505915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896365,0.000027722084,0.00029450518,0.00012360227,0.00040872293,0.00018178717],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023094662,0.0001351592,0.00023594024,0.000031341442,0.001587688,0.000039507762,0.0003516494,0.00008960818,0.000049786442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022188206,0.000106313164,0.0001514728,0.00014562067,0.0003740574,0.00053012767,0.000027111088,0.00055075955,0.000005675163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023660355,0.0009162843,0.15614897,0.000018404595,0.0003225907,0.00000456787,0.02459571,0.00008203484,0.0017206545,0.8113899,0.00017014903,0.004394093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039946227,0.006133667,0.3403602,0.000052937463,0.00022332018,0.00010416648,0.08698977,0.00024554183,0.001668025,0.47623983,0.08272728,0.0012606538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030585623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008769318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3351501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014037724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030802914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125934409","doi":"","title":"The Sexual Assault of Intoxicated Women","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sexual assault; Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); Criminal law; Criminology; Law; Psychiatry; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Medical emergency; History","score_opus":0.018651733011753623,"score_gpt":0.293926267794353,"score_spread":0.2752745347825994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125934409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95249414,0.00014508174,0.0000016243948,0.0037726494,0.0006336802,0.00023541307,0.000008101874,0.00009726756,0.04261205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99029887,0.000047322494,0.00018336897,0.0002207402,0.00041761372,0.000050199767,0.0000017430398,0.000009198916,0.008770957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832654,0.00017471134,0.00024556028,0.00019923801,0.0005684953,0.0004854831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988394,0.000313115,0.00013125023,0.00024602428,0.00025476742,0.00021546544],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011771319,0.00012131109,0.00019500608,0.000010970213,0.0015547712,0.00012692687,0.00053193345,0.00017014798,0.00047059858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012253636,0.000077159915,0.00005469263,0.0002339613,0.0011369558,0.0002091083,0.00011408496,0.0004986677,0.00022545639],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097132055,0.00028138596,0.03479087,0.000039991064,0.00036433,0.000007635623,0.09870742,0.0000063715297,0.10142016,0.71722895,0.026126312,0.020929426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032632635,0.000058244037,0.021526612,0.000006800969,0.000012886787,4.0722315e-7,0.026259286,0.0000058282494,0.0021759344,0.0028369098,0.94656503,0.00022575437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021949504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061232496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9204387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012048117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000087930086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125955803","doi":"","title":"Calculations of Conscience: The Costs and Benefits of Religious and Conscientious Freedom","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Charter; Supreme court; Religious freedom; Law; Freedom of religion; Relation (database); Freedom of thought; Conscientious objector; Political science; Sociology; Human rights; Computer science; Economic freedom","score_opus":0.022717429053566416,"score_gpt":0.27709970866239647,"score_spread":0.25438227960883003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125955803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838259,0.011330965,0.00005478718,0.001260053,0.00011043201,0.00016240048,0.000004519936,0.000007895979,0.0032430543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831019,0.016534852,0.00010902682,0.000018269047,0.000040202565,0.0000019531738,1.5591544e-7,0.0000029268078,0.00019070365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985834,0.00011383295,0.00021395148,0.00010956408,0.0003087379,0.0006705373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992813,0.00014096739,0.00020773082,0.00006536573,0.0002394244,0.00006522338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016660723,0.00007032501,0.00014182538,0.00003705972,0.0008960996,0.000026865433,0.00018304113,0.000047300524,0.0000095212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002779887,0.000044386434,0.000044402517,0.00021421604,0.0019116306,0.00012589221,0.000051793355,0.0003351834,7.5248687e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018026483,0.000047883594,0.0643054,0.0000050748176,0.000109229455,4.4822895e-7,0.050945014,0.000010045449,0.00032372546,0.8764456,0.00016688679,0.007622683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028374959,0.0009864019,0.37834775,0.00017555412,0.00041009774,0.00027512023,0.3168847,0.00011872632,0.0007502154,0.2937358,0.0048078084,0.0006703441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008546167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024710134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5827098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016967845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004938864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126142249","doi":"","title":"Une Procédure en Difficulté: A Blueprint for Resolving 'Special' Education Disputes Through a Quasi-Inquisitorial Administrative Process","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Adversarial system; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Blueprint; Special education; Commonwealth; Mediation; Political science; Administrative law; Psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.2628247367807611,"score_gpt":0.5846679448692832,"score_spread":0.32184320808852207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126142249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85308963,0.0529668,0.0015718156,0.043010697,0.026258871,0.0073205032,0.00047021912,0.00015447763,0.0151569685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94201726,0.020415388,0.0011985308,0.00021541868,0.026964795,0.00094164844,0.000016072176,0.00009033855,0.008140572],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937159,0.001062582,0.0015317076,0.001081747,0.0015533528,0.0010547196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99243426,0.002535116,0.0020996062,0.00040811597,0.0020510608,0.00047185452],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019947025,0.0007399221,0.0013891779,0.0001811182,0.0019678955,0.0019050007,0.003369492,0.00048708473,0.0036295848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005064478,0.00051994936,0.0005199441,0.0016291746,0.0015541272,0.006105127,0.000831686,0.0005428312,0.00003401687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00210037,0.0060971593,0.12324746,0.0017932284,0.002160659,0.000030187057,0.27352053,0.0000354829,0.023174377,0.041990925,0.31115448,0.21469514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029637357,0.0002262735,0.22454019,0.007952739,0.00079762796,0.000011906578,0.06866011,0.000019454461,0.01481778,0.088855475,0.5887994,0.002355291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008547235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035550129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27764493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012259062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014582704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127111541","doi":"","title":"Book Review: John Borrows, Law's Indigenous Ethics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.025796070960167356,"score_gpt":0.3155913606505387,"score_spread":0.2897952896903714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127111541","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014344901,0.509587,0.0000054915718,0.042204864,0.0020780968,0.00287026,0.000050591265,0.00059968396,0.4282591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18452962,0.23020118,0.0009424389,0.37012812,0.002590026,0.00030626677,0.00006857427,0.00012659954,0.21110716],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965608,0.00062678236,0.00041822807,0.000485313,0.0010936548,0.00081518054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982728,0.00038664136,0.00020368419,0.00043903606,0.0003363492,0.00036153695],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016456329,0.00027943944,0.0005136709,0.000019384534,0.001999491,0.00019312682,0.00066361827,0.0003738529,0.004953824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076207967,0.00023460302,0.00022518043,0.000295393,0.00060828676,0.0006814804,0.00018404043,0.0011049142,0.0064827404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020568605,0.00013829336,0.0040116655,0.00079645944,0.00016268928,0.000027907397,0.039449748,0.0000066383614,0.00018093633,0.19298097,0.76146156,0.00076254917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002471726,0.000044336495,0.0006777581,0.00043117418,0.00004171373,0.0000010982905,0.0013121549,5.019959e-7,0.0000756658,0.00033725964,0.99647254,0.0003586324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058137927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032811955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32792327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004278086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024813254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128234126","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3280409","title":"When Does Childhood End? Post-Separation Support for Adult Children in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Separation (statistics); Psychology; Developmental psychology; Demographic economics; Economics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0056077552034546636,"score_gpt":0.2654909371882308,"score_spread":0.2598831819847761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128234126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9796645,0.00034990924,0.000094872325,0.016762322,0.0005189133,0.0005810375,0.000030275254,0.000022028622,0.0019761412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953157,0.00078724354,0.00011053158,0.00073200377,0.0013455075,0.00002117191,0.000016818412,0.000012555817,0.0016584756],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968846,0.00012240426,0.00029909858,0.00020817648,0.0004482633,0.0020374751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906874,0.00006774626,0.00016659731,0.000076344404,0.00051133806,0.000109244196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010257663,0.00014678655,0.00019621251,0.000043690954,0.0010780746,0.00007634529,0.00031776394,0.00007317527,0.00015894794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004898665,0.00010408682,0.00008391411,0.00012450227,0.00013238793,0.00032184462,0.000027526941,0.00062349305,0.000013686515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003780078,0.00039170883,0.49133804,0.000015688815,0.0012618232,0.0000076202973,0.13218002,0.000018885195,0.00045539998,0.24497825,0.017528927,0.11144563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042399084,0.0014164211,0.6416895,0.00006295213,0.00015147994,0.00008704809,0.17088369,0.00003517927,0.00053287175,0.14732966,0.032313265,0.0012580287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93678796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99932647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15035145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047756373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010075949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129657180","doi":"","title":"Reference re Racine v Woods","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Jurisdiction; Metis; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.043805283115543554,"score_gpt":0.325533374529897,"score_spread":0.28172809141435345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129657180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5470702,0.017354611,0.0014510297,0.29711792,0.00066537043,0.000584748,0.000006675992,0.00040685904,0.13534258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98565155,0.009037343,0.00010681895,0.0007286447,0.0011155736,0.000003523915,0.0000012234599,0.000010095494,0.003345209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970002,0.0002061559,0.00021223098,0.00018581458,0.0004699821,0.001925591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938387,0.00006205142,0.00012957999,0.000063605024,0.00014742445,0.00021348403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011346187,0.00012634217,0.00019118759,0.000017669308,0.001184581,0.00009217605,0.00038190186,0.0000890967,0.0002563399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061698037,0.000097083386,0.0000911761,0.00028087557,0.00015485301,0.00027364018,0.000055266177,0.001701125,0.00016805968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016015844,0.00008834472,0.0086952355,0.000016742217,0.0004725498,0.000021552545,0.084697664,0.000028924609,0.001068673,0.82462186,0.010398345,0.069729924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013456811,0.00065951,0.0038347563,0.000037856746,0.00009950182,0.000026208394,0.19641432,0.0000319459,0.00010334947,0.08523383,0.7115619,0.00065113354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010203848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072890995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73938805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097122526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010488753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9110959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130041830","doi":"","title":"Supreme Court of Canada Cases Strengthen Argument for Municipal Obligation to Discharge Duty to Consult: Time to Put Neskonlith to Rest","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Treaty; Indigenous; Argument (complex analysis); Duty; Obligation; Political science; Government (linguistics); Rest (music); Abandonment (legal); High Court","score_opus":0.01687734587924641,"score_gpt":0.28399899034345016,"score_spread":0.2671216444642038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130041830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.964043,0.00014353263,0.000067316774,0.032962438,0.0002666658,0.0015626504,0.00010367514,0.000018946546,0.00083175884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98582006,0.000049450187,0.00036375909,0.00059051276,0.0003134756,0.00005948295,0.0000075906814,0.000018116856,0.01277757],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963941,0.0001399458,0.00040723887,0.00029056822,0.0007403459,0.002027797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984501,0.00028352442,0.00014601603,0.00017294822,0.00044650503,0.00050093525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015386037,0.00019619339,0.00035260085,0.00007849797,0.00068290776,0.000078554745,0.00045964468,0.000060348677,0.00016436535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011418881,0.00016067337,0.000090439054,0.00037827797,0.000036371774,0.00015270367,0.00010846614,0.00035102846,0.00010997385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047176173,0.0012969353,0.048252523,0.00022003417,0.0034286769,0.000031321822,0.37241805,0.014666277,0.052430157,0.26898098,0.1937508,0.039806645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003442936,0.0055957194,0.029126467,0.0004909768,0.000261667,0.000046190115,0.16628893,0.00022981135,0.0029341981,0.0056789503,0.78376704,0.002137112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3751745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9158589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59001625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038359484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028801812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130405249","doi":"","title":"“Public Apologies and Canada’s Indigenous Relations”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of historical studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Sociology; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.14684145410298635,"score_gpt":0.31605604219057054,"score_spread":0.1692145880875842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130405249","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3528225,0.12899813,0.000043648575,0.51006943,0.0019809983,0.00020961091,0.0000036493134,0.00005449887,0.005817528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918322,0.005504932,0.0004382571,0.00062717276,0.00063933345,0.000002000926,9.331087e-8,0.00000441437,0.00095158984],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987074,0.00013097152,0.00033395414,0.000097100616,0.0005052177,0.00022532672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986475,0.0003885334,0.0002779294,0.00002981156,0.00045773332,0.0001984715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002884602,0.00009459493,0.0003499003,0.000023576535,0.0012241398,0.00002700419,0.00015819786,0.000048068945,0.000015300684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004958741,0.00006551211,0.000061781866,0.00014949475,0.00025514918,0.00018423494,0.00008157501,0.00023124188,0.0000024154454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003510915,0.000049794562,0.085057184,0.00003330548,0.00057202723,0.000099339304,0.24144827,0.000009481999,0.000027332651,0.0028608276,0.6622942,0.0075130994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016633033,0.00011611646,0.012517592,0.0000077947025,0.000043004842,0.000003036383,0.03803684,4.773276e-7,0.000002389879,0.00029048024,0.94871,0.00010590332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30134627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.497667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6390097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031431266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043283886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94152176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130544707","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3586","title":"Towards an Account of Linguistic Equality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Indigenous; Economic Justice; Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Section (typography); Linguistics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.07077240674340862,"score_gpt":0.37388678763235916,"score_spread":0.30311438088895054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130544707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06513671,0.0013542299,0.00020147624,0.0026722844,0.0011887145,0.000098920726,0.00001784581,0.000049854756,0.92928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99543834,0.0003266486,0.0024080542,0.0002171071,0.0010864721,0.0000020047687,0.0000028061056,0.000008745156,0.0005098536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978944,0.00046764984,0.00036805737,0.00017516821,0.00073342625,0.00036130327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983756,0.000099735225,0.00022257114,0.00014343549,0.00092532433,0.00023335463],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012280524,0.00011756865,0.00027684623,0.000013586191,0.0013685772,0.0001939884,0.00029836394,0.000103868544,0.0006645431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011394261,0.000096183445,0.00015277066,0.00015180149,0.00036946364,0.00026467626,0.00008458788,0.00031623855,0.000018179735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014184308,0.00017205047,0.0015339713,0.000021358628,0.00008761837,0.00006282031,0.036181174,0.000013686849,0.00065585424,0.95753026,0.00020301148,0.003524002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002202914,0.00032886173,0.0385755,0.0003620213,0.00036113692,0.00013304167,0.08589481,0.00007258781,0.007510563,0.5628884,0.30034757,0.0013225965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1329719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29555127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9303016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021812138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002423139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130641001","doi":"10.32396/usurj.v7i1.496","title":"The Historic and Contemporary Permanence of the Doctrine of Discovery in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"USURJ University of Saskatchewan Undergraduate Research Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Doctrine; Indigenous; Governmentality; Legitimacy; Law; Colonialism; Notice; Political science; Legislation; Sociology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.0414054743082365,"score_gpt":0.28524377282499486,"score_spread":0.24383829851675837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130641001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96764827,0.0026120287,0.0000056485837,0.026575895,0.00011682858,0.00012223775,0.000011628759,0.0000014379708,0.0029060324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915703,0.004160105,0.000028974524,0.000006146669,0.000020861558,7.533148e-8,3.3082267e-7,0.0000023348196,0.004210907],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973616,0.000976995,0.00020683072,0.000111420384,0.0010681447,0.000275011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981594,0.0007953738,0.00020513154,0.00012655254,0.0006201274,0.00009340255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014415947,0.000064010754,0.0002031105,0.00004358335,0.0011204891,0.000026645583,0.000459116,0.000033470358,0.000008226605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039055094,0.00004333762,0.000073958334,0.00055125734,0.0014731868,0.00023099675,0.00026699444,0.0004581826,1.4855539e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040794784,0.00024850265,0.72861606,0.00025623266,0.00047173013,0.00045489363,0.23065242,0.00013514733,0.0068159015,0.009960218,0.014284471,0.0076964744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083812315,0.000044671106,0.16433066,0.000217162,0.000015766907,0.000010104232,0.8066087,0.00001667287,0.00090768875,0.0025228225,0.02437103,0.00011662605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94119716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9852692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5759562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010935938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006827446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133456921","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3579","title":"Potential Aboriginal Rights-holders: Canada and Cultural Communities versus Indigenous Peoples and Socio-political Bodies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Indigenous rights; Supreme court; Multiculturalism; Politics; Democracy; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.025003954641458763,"score_gpt":0.3035963335604575,"score_spread":0.27859237891899874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133456921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92656887,0.004479149,0.00000659942,0.005818611,0.0009937574,0.000115935036,0.000045069526,0.000042206793,0.061929792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99576294,0.0022703437,0.00051663106,0.00025219386,0.00074580056,0.0000048826146,0.000010432413,0.000010683675,0.00042609582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762017,0.000429344,0.00028109737,0.00018554411,0.0006812819,0.0008025685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985539,0.00035100646,0.000115950104,0.00009765547,0.0004295236,0.00045198912],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002872005,0.00023292116,0.00033939886,0.000018365916,0.0074130646,0.00074286334,0.00021336992,0.000131885,0.00014532886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000088051405,0.0001823362,0.00008398417,0.00006129801,0.0013959002,0.00050487655,0.00011433152,0.000571184,0.0000027411436],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009036858,0.000103146056,0.010854179,0.000056229215,0.00048924825,0.0005709909,0.17023946,0.0000071985633,0.00006526744,0.8151217,0.001960798,0.00044142627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025386938,0.00014528853,0.02042029,0.00013159362,0.00030499106,0.0005276582,0.895877,0.000011782042,0.00013579537,0.016841475,0.06225437,0.0008110566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98782426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79828024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005587601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007203794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99387914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133915360","doi":"","title":"The Deification of Process in Canada’s Duty to Consult: Tsleil-Waututh Nation v Canada (Attorney General)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Duty; Law; Indigenous; Political science; Articulation (sociology); Process (computing); Computer science","score_opus":0.03486071137276479,"score_gpt":0.2785298110444996,"score_spread":0.2436690996717348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133915360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.972582,0.000029833644,0.000034537312,0.007679001,0.000103441096,0.0007643897,0.00016378745,0.0000099661775,0.01863308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955916,0.00020508551,0.00022618855,0.00001859192,0.000019327092,2.8273584e-7,0.000015886024,0.000004532955,0.0039184955],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969963,0.0007179026,0.0001352101,0.00032856973,0.0012812297,0.00054081716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768525,0.000792617,0.00015071884,0.00023923011,0.00088687125,0.00024533237],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008216034,0.000111464746,0.00023796891,0.00017726402,0.0014374068,0.000016411746,0.0010052443,0.000052758875,0.00010550989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000437384,0.000116557516,0.00005162128,0.0009781077,0.0006623194,0.00025766017,0.00030193516,0.00032256928,0.000011017767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016408738,0.00026849133,0.6163227,0.00033289392,0.00041739113,0.00015485741,0.21903756,0.0024537903,0.0059427707,0.09368756,0.046204872,0.013536221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008119187,0.00006484156,0.4320537,0.000064271866,0.000013901335,2.6118747e-7,0.32302058,0.00054234307,0.00013137801,0.00020646011,0.24286328,0.00022706472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9994109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1966584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030833352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007841522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135466910","doi":"","title":"Sudden Death: Deconstructing the Justice Minister's Approach to Medical Aid in Dying Following Canada's 2015 Federal Election","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Government (linguistics); Politics; Charter; Bill of rights; Economic Justice; Legislation; Constitutional right; Constitution","score_opus":0.016876749337513947,"score_gpt":0.3002807358628491,"score_spread":0.28340398652533516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135466910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9689686,0.0010831736,0.00029891686,0.011782012,0.001198725,0.00038431946,5.016176e-7,0.00002239584,0.016261362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966522,0.00023192124,0.00016165824,0.00057552726,0.0006683574,0.0000125249735,9.825653e-7,0.000014039318,0.0016827815],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955466,0.00039295896,0.0003652495,0.00026629545,0.0010805369,0.0023483925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908555,0.0003510227,0.00014209555,0.000095507356,0.00008564849,0.00024017405],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003949208,0.00017186337,0.00025937695,0.00005242264,0.0018984111,0.0002006026,0.0005053079,0.0001230838,0.00005052375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013502431,0.00012263682,0.000108085806,0.0003543419,0.000057763456,0.00025095677,0.000081330865,0.0018346226,0.000011465175],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036533287,0.00033854687,0.6119267,0.000113286784,0.0019081599,0.00008581592,0.11975783,0.001729249,0.0005522882,0.16617957,0.0072820405,0.08976123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035712367,0.00032772636,0.019248629,0.00029457686,0.00034256812,0.00073393766,0.9209559,0.0019494705,0.00004796843,0.008138555,0.042884026,0.0015053893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46387446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9322265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80119807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047541982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070199473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135600008","doi":"10.7202/1075514ar","title":"Unwritten Constitutional Principles: The Challenge of Reconciling Political and Legal Constitutionalisms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law; Constitutional review; Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06804872899419606,"score_gpt":0.31988490502979905,"score_spread":0.251836176035603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135600008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06997751,0.00072748057,0.000028980901,0.025085201,0.0007163433,0.0002914021,0.0000671754,0.000026508664,0.9030794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99851346,0.00017612179,0.00035235926,0.00029769106,0.00032661873,0.0000033888339,0.0000011584385,0.0000030692233,0.0003261612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844897,0.00019116321,0.00032053917,0.00014781715,0.0005314068,0.0003600802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989594,0.00034745169,0.00014118687,0.00007740444,0.00030458067,0.00016997199],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010217029,0.00010523674,0.00020666653,0.00001840661,0.003960414,0.000066831264,0.00019339407,0.00008576843,0.00031754305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033339503,0.00006623026,0.00009664387,0.000066948036,0.003997463,0.0002982075,0.00007965108,0.00033409995,0.000025305573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009376563,0.000021744561,0.0013938481,0.000008092972,0.000052131054,0.000007279105,0.00042427584,0.000024026174,0.000018271103,0.9978723,0.000021410038,0.00014727216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005425061,0.00004655441,0.0016053092,0.00008241517,0.000031963147,0.00012018463,0.008385097,0.000023804347,0.00006440023,0.004799031,0.9841451,0.0001536524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028042137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036096945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9930732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021324905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008177561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138532977","doi":"","title":"The (Near) Death of Duress","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Pleading; Variety (cybernetics); Law; Flexibility (engineering); Political science; Section (typography); Criminal code; Law and economics; Criminal law; Business; Supreme court; Sociology; Computer science; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.03130431486674794,"score_gpt":0.32180838053788857,"score_spread":0.2905040656711406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138532977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90780765,0.024940584,0.0002640092,0.020939726,0.0008743606,0.00027717926,0.0000015334604,0.00005147065,0.04484348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889291,0.0054107285,0.000047192003,0.000028313261,0.00035863966,0.000002938778,1.713007e-7,0.0000057539733,0.005217151],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756026,0.00023331904,0.00016099923,0.000077952565,0.00053593086,0.0014315413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926263,0.0001180838,0.00015326911,0.00007495171,0.0002829261,0.00010816786],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034363114,0.00007536527,0.000119875476,0.000010595948,0.0015072762,0.00009664275,0.00037826315,0.00005173281,0.000007980326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007003918,0.00004297364,0.0000864564,0.00011768374,0.00033943544,0.00013626552,0.000040923565,0.00072722195,0.000019611678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004208179,0.000030424779,0.012814294,0.0000014034771,0.00017602653,0.0000013849783,0.017172879,0.000020263988,0.000023407429,0.95614797,0.0015200543,0.012049816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009492182,0.0003098303,0.0065916143,0.000020061649,0.00006366638,0.00003652854,0.17279665,0.000022226157,0.000062273226,0.4365421,0.38234815,0.00025769585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033321043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015447506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5196059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010349397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021679804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138558795","doi":"10.1017/9781316591482","title":"The Disabled Contract: Severe Intellectual Disability, Justice and Morality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Economic Justice; Rationality; Realm; Politics; Sociology; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Social contract; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.04473649516898875,"score_gpt":0.3279078894391676,"score_spread":0.28317139427017884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138558795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011955823,0.0027169408,0.0000041466087,0.018099386,0.0007498886,0.0007341642,0.000040511513,0.00012090448,0.9763385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04765575,0.004830398,0.000053527416,0.0003272969,0.000963622,0.000032252563,0.000025882739,0.000018519928,0.9460927],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975576,0.00041899466,0.00036204726,0.0004941065,0.00066465256,0.0005026032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99288225,0.006211136,0.00014038877,0.00028197802,0.0002969608,0.00018725514],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090724987,0.00031381397,0.0004964141,0.0000055726596,0.003169883,0.00051626074,0.0003970348,0.00038233452,0.0014795179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005379819,0.0001858047,0.00017878317,0.00009601841,0.003600579,0.00015923967,0.00043891656,0.0005812736,0.00007081647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059810856,0.000107161606,0.0007453227,0.00030179665,0.00047202918,0.000011174791,0.05880463,0.0000012857713,0.0000018602638,0.40350515,0.51962197,0.016367825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018624298,0.00001621217,0.00095361035,0.000052950938,0.00034359223,0.0000014223668,0.020699812,0.000008418295,0.000001190806,0.0060340757,0.9713268,0.0003756411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00651568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.065779135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4517049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008108107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034658983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139266291","doi":"","title":"The Limits of Local Authority Over Recreational Cannabis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Cannabis; Legalization; Legislation; Recreation; Statutory law; Business; Local government; Scope (computer science); Local authority; Local community; Effects of cannabis; Public administration; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03605802892774972,"score_gpt":0.3366977229642282,"score_spread":0.30063969403647844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139266291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6785252,0.0002488032,0.000051865132,0.017393138,0.00045779409,0.00030426015,0.000004880393,0.00004243258,0.30297163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94288933,0.00008287934,0.00011126697,0.000060613693,0.00008986511,0.000006686997,8.2626747e-7,0.0000020460748,0.0567565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991608,0.00009404284,0.00011182268,0.000094397954,0.0003710284,0.00016790997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999485,0.00019541808,0.000048300928,0.000072193,0.00015427012,0.00004479463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039609498,0.000049715993,0.00008586524,0.000005492955,0.00051834574,0.000025566074,0.000148244,0.000052981813,0.0007123661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019719856,0.000027577753,0.000053375497,0.00011163576,0.00037339813,0.000095253534,0.000033598608,0.00006514009,0.0000849282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022466915,0.000037450205,0.060773727,0.00000806656,0.000063438834,2.503544e-7,0.014405264,0.000014721817,0.0001432304,0.8599708,0.048805192,0.015755357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001677356,0.000028578168,0.36066163,0.000009610881,0.00000922289,6.9276716e-8,0.021456016,0.00007380626,0.00034932347,0.0018317987,0.6153028,0.00010941196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027488235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016823897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85813904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011680437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007166517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9789878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140549940","doi":"10.25071/2563-3694.6","title":"On the One Time I Lost My Virginity, and the Three Times I Gave It Away","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Sociology Journal of Critical Praxis","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virginity test; Revelation; Psychology; Gender studies; Sociology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.05681116233828342,"score_gpt":0.34301546651326276,"score_spread":0.28620430417497933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140549940","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057604447,0.0017681471,0.0001716031,0.9120258,0.00019629637,0.0002449601,0.0000051608968,0.000017113607,0.027966438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771198,0.00027824932,0.00021815946,0.020419547,0.0014414971,0.0000027604506,2.800539e-7,0.00000932775,0.000510389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734783,0.0011893759,0.00039792884,0.00017197417,0.0005125544,0.0003803376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893362,0.009839251,0.00016259683,0.000095639225,0.00027942026,0.0002869254],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017570767,0.00015881423,0.0004621902,0.000014637576,0.0011316114,0.00008192594,0.00048587922,0.00021108743,0.0020734267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014670914,0.00007840381,0.0002099729,0.000094190465,0.007013328,0.00017107022,0.00015111291,0.0009976848,0.00037348963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040667917,0.00009424017,0.00041535115,0.000013864103,0.00029919116,0.000022971873,0.10145701,0.000003277514,0.0001350187,0.7492135,0.14682975,0.001109114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003959561,0.0016040748,0.006240195,0.00010785499,0.0005559174,0.000025120718,0.038049333,0.00015356194,0.000090998066,0.8325147,0.116183884,0.0005147915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019675872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000064908636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9195154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007437061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015429113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99883884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3143797967","doi":"10.1111/mlr.2006.69.issue-4","title":"Constitutional Rights and Social Welfare: A Comment on the Canadian Chaoulli Health Care Decision","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Charter; Political science; Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Health care; Judicial deference; Judicial review; Social security; Social rights; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.011955574813297636,"score_gpt":0.21892104661762354,"score_spread":0.2069654718043259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3143797967","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06815398,0.00019170906,0.000009849038,0.64128804,0.00030970504,0.0007918407,0.0004773603,0.0002449493,0.28853256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98873323,0.000026908661,0.00016454182,0.0039205803,0.00022617575,0.0000032289863,0.00023225005,0.000010438745,0.006682648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770963,0.00024034448,0.00022668242,0.00044244996,0.00062982814,0.0007510868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898523,0.0002415089,0.00013605953,0.00016766223,0.00010702792,0.00036250352],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018063895,0.00028497606,0.0003011146,0.000116160845,0.010687958,0.00044603393,0.00048305467,0.00018775267,0.00038247582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003650568,0.00022249455,0.00015262971,0.00045693043,0.002275862,0.0010107722,0.0002004541,0.000295709,0.000045973255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002671871,0.000040154926,0.0020827344,0.000006000638,0.000028472421,0.000021975819,0.0061181705,0.0000030399651,1.8274376e-7,0.78736037,0.20326449,0.0010477139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004094976,0.000041277566,0.00979949,0.000020397756,0.0000123715,8.0654326e-7,0.009794978,0.0000019329364,0.000009771178,0.0031863924,0.9764365,0.00028659162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31000045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29191068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92057925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011053904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005803885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3145048401","doi":"10.1017/9781316591482","title":"The Disabled Contract","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Rationality; Economic Justice; Sociology; Politics; Morality; Social contract; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Face (sociological concept); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.028241657407926404,"score_gpt":0.24958177607201523,"score_spread":0.22134011866408881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3145048401","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000055552915,0.00096680823,0.000009682218,0.00070077163,0.00067480694,0.0005641795,0.00009629533,0.00014440471,0.9967875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00059359684,0.0017844388,0.000019017894,0.00009122686,0.0005700174,0.0000022388112,0.000030501189,0.000020464664,0.9968885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979559,0.00037604838,0.00016691558,0.0004021938,0.00056586316,0.00053305883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981267,0.00071944756,0.00022337114,0.0003511725,0.00038015802,0.00019917285],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031737986,0.00028248187,0.00039343553,0.00002139509,0.0035046493,0.0002612883,0.0008256018,0.00038712437,0.000009578454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021638765,0.00023160194,0.00031924483,0.000021619951,0.0014149533,0.000106618696,0.0004101194,0.00055039435,0.00002257264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001843482,0.0000060241346,0.000003481766,0.00001445927,0.00017771627,0.000086511915,0.0010319628,2.5925263e-7,0.0000030192832,0.6544941,0.3433927,0.0007713134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002843281,0.000008851998,0.000063212654,0.00007614939,0.0001699255,7.53795e-7,0.0020419366,0.0000027265207,0.000013627908,0.000010151555,0.9970202,0.00030813637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048254207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008754934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.654484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011978679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006453504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99779266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W314588749","doi":"","title":"Custody and Access Decision-Making and the Breastfeeding Child (Case Comment re Cavannah v. Johne)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Breastfeeding; Consistency (knowledge bases); Best interests; Inclusion (mineral); Medicine; Psychology; Law; Political science; Pediatrics; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.015971023200879463,"score_gpt":0.3298953897583531,"score_spread":0.31392436655747363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W314588749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70908785,0.028191423,0.00086861453,0.24874102,0.00035422377,0.0006439239,0.0000026729356,0.000074699776,0.012035553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834151,0.014678387,0.000065684966,0.0012162537,0.0005155951,0.000003390612,1.8008959e-7,0.0000072895127,0.00009807143],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974894,0.00024051307,0.00025389204,0.00020138606,0.0004069368,0.0014078525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991284,0.00038739573,0.0001763759,0.00008315566,0.00010448646,0.00012018345],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030064692,0.00016222615,0.00023482455,0.000045780143,0.0043932535,0.0005462317,0.0003053429,0.00007386519,0.00002077689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048118565,0.000096998505,0.00008003139,0.00019005293,0.0003745994,0.0005071765,0.00012269651,0.0012570084,0.0000019420177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026274764,0.000067126115,0.0029743414,0.0000050632266,0.00023437283,0.00009630092,0.035379924,0.000021404068,0.0000062001272,0.27624443,0.0014846281,0.6832234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00728936,0.00047612947,0.03213573,0.00061240623,0.0004173449,0.009596685,0.25129634,0.00041550054,0.000008216377,0.64253736,0.054075748,0.001139197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018338001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012632608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68208426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006673164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001930489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146001282","doi":"10.1017/9781139236249","title":"A.V. Dicey and the Common Law Constitutional Tradition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Positive law; Venn diagram; Constitution; Philosophy of law; Common law; Philosophy; Power (physics); Rule of law; Public law; Political science; Constitutional law; Sovereignty; Sociology; Politics; Black letter law; Private law; Physics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03592682075332374,"score_gpt":0.23680674336547505,"score_spread":0.20087992261215132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3146001282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000070255606,0.0003662048,0.000032218933,0.001636093,0.00022799456,0.00063276885,0.000288657,0.000111861846,0.99663395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026034098,0.0003728669,0.00002104172,0.00050894666,0.0004698721,0.0000024757903,0.00007118805,0.000008126566,0.9725114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869317,0.00030651258,0.00012264545,0.0002867323,0.0003876809,0.00020323799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911195,0.0003615105,0.00014974028,0.0001185129,0.00010525954,0.00015304878],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019510562,0.00020124823,0.0003460595,0.000017913595,0.0021589228,0.00010225998,0.00035434338,0.00023576681,0.000003413975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034488086,0.00016542274,0.00015070812,0.000013210356,0.010397525,0.00012086958,0.00021186916,0.00043068474,0.0000084095645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006422349,0.000003661318,0.0000015483888,0.000025259224,0.00010250915,0.00003127802,0.0021085707,3.7855685e-7,7.981926e-7,0.8884176,0.10914933,0.00009484713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008663042,0.000011202246,0.000026628037,0.00005775051,0.00021648202,0.000001960934,0.0013368612,0.000009696936,0.0000033760102,0.00015941203,0.997101,0.00020933275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048597977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019969637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88825816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043090523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023754568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3147790050","doi":"","title":"Confronting Violence Against Women - A Brief Guide to International Human Rights Law for Canadian Advocates","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; International human rights law; Law; Political science; Right to property; Linguistic rights; International law; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Fundamental rights; Public international law","score_opus":0.009403434427572159,"score_gpt":0.2977142710669516,"score_spread":0.28831083663937945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3147790050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.891203,0.0005853353,0.00009696523,0.008526919,0.00037228732,0.0005115188,0.000016723066,0.00006146891,0.09862577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812451,0.00038341395,0.00021253347,0.00081113836,0.0009822045,0.00004908084,0.0000062783834,0.000012602837,0.016297657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963684,0.00008301287,0.00029472393,0.00023063067,0.00034918552,0.0026740122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991723,0.000054967524,0.00008890724,0.00007416393,0.00023758231,0.00037211427],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015922103,0.00014813813,0.0001803756,0.000059522154,0.0037283613,0.00022677802,0.00055382855,0.00007693753,0.00032125344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010657222,0.00012889056,0.00009583721,0.000121637655,0.00016444895,0.00029940743,0.000020999016,0.000518584,0.00005203102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048268106,0.000051262985,0.0010666705,0.0000039463052,0.00038237116,0.000007410397,0.02872821,0.000090095804,0.0002578975,0.898301,0.00405991,0.06700298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046112656,0.00009817532,0.0004159655,0.00004837442,0.000010536273,0.000006277276,0.010978892,0.000010709611,0.000032793083,0.07070325,0.91699165,0.00024222636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51297224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94381756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91293174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006124583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011155158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99769074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148322179","doi":"","title":"Patriation and its consequences : constitution making in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"UBC Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutionalism; Politics; Federalism; Law; Constitutional law; Charter; Political science; Democracy; Sociology","score_opus":0.07906494785020259,"score_gpt":0.31065752163248356,"score_spread":0.23159257378228099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148322179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010787116,0.004395685,0.0000013576372,0.0002460347,0.00058485084,0.0007143135,0.00006311801,0.00003989542,0.99287605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6043638,0.00046206545,0.000037758095,0.00013207154,0.00043727882,0.00006563833,0.000017648445,0.000011454452,0.3944723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984544,0.00018155041,0.00026502,0.00026725256,0.0005471702,0.0002846137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992493,0.00016444217,0.0002295124,0.00007013811,0.00019592853,0.00009072058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038506926,0.00018317034,0.00030603248,0.00003286285,0.00035282355,0.00007713424,0.00016297282,0.00020877563,0.000010975358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003331121,0.00016562243,0.000027674878,0.000013007912,0.00043129493,0.00009497852,0.00008500542,0.00024196054,0.000002401798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050719835,0.00000903667,0.0007110316,0.00027233319,0.00016319175,0.00015769587,0.060090285,0.00004253646,0.000027953705,0.86771333,0.05697557,0.013786325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002896819,0.000009193441,0.00014031296,0.0003102322,0.00004473377,0.0000013390281,0.0016786491,0.000021545418,0.000020431602,0.0030486868,0.9941009,0.00033424757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95335144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98909223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9371254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025971474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050629824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89815134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3149007528","doi":"10.1017/9781108955195.011","title":"Radical Title of the Crown and Aboriginal Title: North America 1763, New South Wales 1788, and New Zealand 1840","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Sovereignty; Indigenous; English law; Law; Irish; Welsh; Common law; Relevance (law); Feudalism; Political science; History; Genealogy; Archaeology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024675657364858623,"score_gpt":0.23688420226565035,"score_spread":0.21220854490079172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3149007528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006021438,0.0005574901,0.000005113045,0.00017601986,0.0001128965,0.000088789355,0.000051303738,0.000015170884,0.9983911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00090292265,0.00048517462,0.000053729786,0.00002366176,0.00014702004,4.8983015e-8,0.000003797808,0.000005410277,0.9983782],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958766,0.000018237693,0.00004682384,0.00012615098,0.0001350016,0.00008614577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971855,0.000025005094,0.00005913395,0.00007685731,0.000033354765,0.000087092674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000017180817,0.000082784114,0.00013595409,0.000012344947,0.00015669917,0.00001964335,0.00010962826,0.00008386086,0.00007742571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000097541515,0.000065997105,0.000046675887,0.000007871729,0.00047341784,0.0000170079,0.00008931914,0.00012421154,0.000011565614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011418629,0.000003092043,0.00025990148,0.00002693125,0.00010910055,0.000020614665,0.0033835545,1.13811076e-7,0.0000032844798,0.31915453,0.6701514,0.006876055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092855,0.000004235166,0.0005275767,0.000025798767,0.000059237263,5.5020547e-7,0.00014900195,5.609066e-7,0.0000034206462,0.000004535748,0.9990534,0.00007880912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026521985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016109576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.328902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037772526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001535971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40093488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3149680829","doi":"10.4324/9781003161387-14","title":"Not empty of laws","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0684219108686456,"score_gpt":0.32321634440810093,"score_spread":0.2547944335394553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3149680829","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015710472,0.0007649767,0.0000028851007,0.0022841645,0.00033997686,0.00017747139,0.000021696875,0.000055526525,0.9961962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011063993,0.0011789177,0.00037424173,0.00024302467,0.0003923527,0.0000036476608,0.000008921797,0.000013549895,0.98672134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987356,0.000030814295,0.00024406228,0.00023284495,0.0005625186,0.00019414417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991325,0.00013799104,0.00022071743,0.00014359244,0.00029079118,0.000074402815],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019778703,0.00016775863,0.00040138245,0.000018267086,0.00030442502,0.000029587678,0.00020750443,0.00030708197,0.00837911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001859018,0.00013032234,0.0002361833,0.000025399982,0.0004974671,0.000055495155,0.00013443572,0.00018919022,0.00017723186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024300439,0.000007559246,0.000033657296,0.000022688226,0.00010449038,0.000008312421,0.0052891662,1.6449192e-7,0.0000183448,0.9774237,0.014333929,0.0027555523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006576703,0.000010389948,0.00017696353,0.000061809464,0.000040425326,1.8218721e-7,0.001770866,1.646554e-7,0.000068299836,0.00205405,0.99555176,0.00019932858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005837912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012735253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013481165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000100563324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99252737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152388838","doi":"","title":"Selling What No One Can Buy","year":2018,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Advertising; Marketing; Commerce; Computer science","score_opus":0.046543231532101006,"score_gpt":0.3809345777035893,"score_spread":0.3343913461714883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152388838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83226156,0.010654575,0.000018154582,0.008498361,0.013617739,0.0018683039,0.000011652538,0.00025041928,0.13281925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43176043,0.045661632,0.001698694,0.00046696776,0.007653302,0.00012797334,0.00027043044,0.00011026854,0.5122503],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952174,0.00036110255,0.0006029376,0.0010374403,0.0015367033,0.0012444098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99654627,0.00029026103,0.0007633387,0.00037016446,0.0016101918,0.00041975855],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007491957,0.0007433065,0.0009475147,0.0000768906,0.0037890256,0.0011146327,0.00077882246,0.00090259674,0.0047414075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006592154,0.00071252085,0.0003836101,0.000699915,0.0008426646,0.0006942331,0.000112423644,0.00075386005,0.0046717217],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008301825,0.00014249497,0.00015239579,0.00028539522,0.0004333121,0.000005884272,0.9849947,0.0000062941945,0.001175333,0.00052025047,0.0050241626,0.007176744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035429973,0.0001726865,0.0012595465,0.0013430134,0.0003532133,3.027441e-7,0.7599155,0.00007128828,0.0015254902,0.00014342296,0.2336997,0.0011615567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056054458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045441095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40050113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072483363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003330251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153094520","doi":"","title":"Living Well Together: Understanding Treaties as Arguments to Share (L'esprit des Traités : le Traité comme Accord de partage)","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Indigenous; Possession (linguistics); Ethnology; Political science; Humanities; Land rights; Order (exchange); Negotiation; Geography; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.08319810951596532,"score_gpt":0.335933582618597,"score_spread":0.25273547310263167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153094520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91649973,0.02173147,0.0040451596,0.030264951,0.0010806452,0.0005704239,0.000021779822,0.00011658036,0.025669271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9469505,0.008797537,0.00035555236,0.0006783591,0.0018849183,0.000019358404,0.0000017684163,0.000056622226,0.04125541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921721,0.0008893208,0.0005736464,0.00045966278,0.000729081,0.005176173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983203,0.00045191703,0.0003081539,0.00016914116,0.00023259273,0.0005179165],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032530858,0.00048056126,0.000534635,0.00010757251,0.004952749,0.00053325854,0.00079927937,0.000299404,0.001394877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046099006,0.00044278332,0.00035316116,0.0006202293,0.0011987439,0.00091760844,0.00017098406,0.0018149773,0.00043459705],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018043783,0.0005384451,0.024896193,0.00006748482,0.0016967879,0.000026076072,0.43411937,0.000046127407,0.0006016339,0.4415752,0.0034476994,0.09280455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010135261,0.0017834975,0.0054564006,0.000792122,0.00028660937,0.00019220143,0.60421616,0.000058073187,0.00016983421,0.2936941,0.09139097,0.0009464872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015442172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12526938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17009683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0111803645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023146446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154429129","doi":"","title":"A Gendered Approach to “Quality of Life” after Separation under the British Columbia Family Law Act Relocation Regime","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Guardian; Credibility; Family law; Quality (philosophy); Inclusion (mineral); Distancing; Political science; Family reunification; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Medicine; Immigration","score_opus":0.07373998263430484,"score_gpt":0.36689734390045337,"score_spread":0.29315736126614855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154429129","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09218231,0.38167864,0.00014040462,0.0059237718,0.0004976321,0.002903083,0.00009349029,0.00008255122,0.51649815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94704866,0.04856309,0.0001244836,0.0035604679,0.000116084724,0.00013485702,0.000050288567,0.000008915524,0.00039312887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978803,0.00042187035,0.00061291846,0.00028913346,0.0005534182,0.00024236186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988315,0.00006269651,0.000299238,0.0002498522,0.0004353996,0.00012131792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012283004,0.00011872439,0.00048679364,0.0000035241897,0.00082259736,0.00020659967,0.00017581812,0.000074663134,0.000023734228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000089675705,0.00009925613,0.0001614461,0.00026981745,0.00057032204,0.00025232811,0.00011016695,0.0001375701,0.000004531608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018264269,0.00024413213,0.00030751337,0.005647109,0.000114028815,3.859034e-7,0.0037847639,9.193453e-7,0.00004007805,0.97426623,0.00322386,0.012352716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032244992,0.000033516306,0.019255087,0.002815412,0.00010693964,0.000001442938,0.00293481,0.0000027725737,0.000018135986,0.0016116803,0.9726337,0.0002640609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15805428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24916418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9726545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014471443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000976218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8475523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154534422","doi":"10.29173/mlj915","title":"Section 31 of the Manitoba Act, 1870: A Land Claim Agreement","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Agreement; Philosophy; Linguistics; Business","score_opus":0.027217500358058443,"score_gpt":0.27274179694630635,"score_spread":0.2455242965882479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154534422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.932451,0.00011112002,0.00004052353,0.0030738697,0.0021472324,0.00023791502,0.0000023817588,0.000027497534,0.061908476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969377,0.000091462614,0.00011654356,0.00027654148,0.0023254731,0.0000057654265,4.5745827e-7,0.000007530171,0.00023852798],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998182,0.00037103656,0.0002886281,0.00013106652,0.0006955793,0.00033171094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915904,0.00009971907,0.00028330725,0.00013446408,0.00021962306,0.00010384716],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009311956,0.00012703336,0.00018787943,0.000021452188,0.0026208553,0.0001672808,0.0003900897,0.00009151559,0.00009840875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016525437,0.00007760079,0.00016899558,0.00015241139,0.0003652123,0.0002116848,0.00010591258,0.00036485316,0.000037364658],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016360245,0.0005867453,0.7289385,0.00012573061,0.00078334665,0.00002238066,0.0497211,0.00032688802,0.0026198134,0.083776064,0.04540331,0.08753249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009791447,0.0001485879,0.29799217,0.00012609159,0.00011867902,0.000031574684,0.06640794,0.000032491578,0.00065526256,0.0038584643,0.6293235,0.0003261009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.111048795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7616261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6505773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037796717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003548269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154575014","doi":"","title":"Structural Cooperative Federalism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Constitution; Cooperative federalism; Constitutionalism; Dual federalism; Political science; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Law; New Federalism; Sociology; Democracy; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.018903588269553025,"score_gpt":0.30351273705761983,"score_spread":0.2846091487880668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154575014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9409132,0.0024338088,0.00052248425,0.041898135,0.0007287426,0.00023521943,0.0000041101534,0.000097725606,0.013166552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767822,0.0040266467,0.000038974224,0.00015285579,0.0009345078,0.0000046883165,3.769714e-7,0.00000982175,0.018049909],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967532,0.00026890266,0.00018829106,0.00016390168,0.00041079315,0.0022148874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935937,0.00011162156,0.00010884279,0.00006392458,0.00023239225,0.00012383675],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010567124,0.00013578992,0.00016540563,0.000026640733,0.0022356384,0.00013193424,0.00028261633,0.000080243495,0.00033070595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003885429,0.000072788556,0.00010411168,0.0001246147,0.00032757738,0.00046657142,0.000038591694,0.0006587266,0.000102913924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003090619,0.000011976713,0.003677562,9.2006377e-7,0.00020510706,0.000003818262,0.0115858875,0.0000021670455,0.00081580423,0.93126035,0.000932312,0.051473204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042614276,0.00068167504,0.022133442,0.00010775323,0.000109784516,0.0002012974,0.13799238,0.000010078801,0.0005161221,0.6416538,0.19090432,0.0014279304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019703615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02250246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28960657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002281819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011485899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155058604","doi":"10.82308/27594","title":"Recognition of common-law spousal relationships in Canadian family law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; University of Rwanda; Université du Québec à Montréal; United States Agency for International Development","keywords":"Law; Family law; Common law; Political science","score_opus":0.06196587599246816,"score_gpt":0.28058337373215475,"score_spread":0.21861749773968658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155058604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5796664,0.00012083765,2.1269663e-8,0.00012698327,0.00025340775,0.0003515382,0.00023280781,0.000057977115,0.41919005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980133,0.00010343583,0.0005764239,0.00075585255,0.000026205522,0.000050126517,0.000032984797,0.000032700947,0.00040893254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958878,0.0015519613,0.0006249074,0.00044450673,0.0005975803,0.00089323905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814516,0.0005457787,0.00021095434,0.00025473742,0.00032299725,0.00052038464],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026553744,0.00027306442,0.00041855036,0.00014587652,0.0033439123,0.000061113424,0.00033670245,0.0003984609,0.00014187775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015742499,0.0002869528,0.00014438751,0.0007755717,0.00056514895,0.0009355283,0.00005012018,0.0008764714,0.00024420628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011883591,0.000095777716,0.002673019,0.00001712276,0.00003410681,0.000020094707,0.00021374806,0.00001362356,0.00071952393,0.99243927,0.000007641667,0.0037541618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014896044,0.00011102009,0.028339708,0.00024353438,0.00009177801,0.000005812268,0.010616099,0.0000061869328,0.004947206,0.21228589,0.7406995,0.0011636287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80923724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97339934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7801534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018582653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000105985346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155090396","doi":"10.21991/cf29415","title":"“This Charter applies…”: The Supreme Court of Canada’s Fundamental Error in the Trinity Western University decisions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University; Royal Society of Canada; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Battle; Academic freedom; Charter; Sociology; Higher education; History","score_opus":0.04662990985390994,"score_gpt":0.2854992316328855,"score_spread":0.23886932177897555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155090396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29660794,0.0020300508,0.0050540348,0.32871687,0.0043989704,0.00300109,0.0022518886,0.00014690247,0.35779226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99653816,0.00011899725,0.00010616592,0.0013221555,0.000091331916,0.0000192497,0.00004906244,0.0000033067083,0.0017515463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973046,0.0003538089,0.0004048203,0.00033680402,0.0009664354,0.00063354225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980986,0.00089451624,0.00016497345,0.00029219233,0.00041583192,0.00013387675],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007386933,0.00021345126,0.00030269427,0.000053703283,0.004085173,0.00007642248,0.0006485557,0.00012873765,0.0004629203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007902434,0.00014800392,0.00018286034,0.0005447401,0.007161585,0.0004183256,0.0002420683,0.00036476165,0.000037288497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036237267,0.00011788704,0.044731457,0.0000054420007,0.00007087489,0.00005462119,0.0026684788,0.00009666869,0.00003919308,0.9334171,0.018600734,0.00016133914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010860824,0.000016529953,0.025712,0.0000886459,0.000061995066,0.000041979754,0.10384486,0.000035327703,0.00005083992,0.0016355276,0.8671312,0.00029505359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12624352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83606946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93178153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009029626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059506013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155556815","doi":"10.29173/alr2646","title":"The Alberta Court of Appeal's Vexatious Litigant Order Trilogy: Respecting Legislative Supremacy, Preserving Access to the Courts, and Hopefully Not to a Fault","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Jurisdiction; Statute; Political science; Statutory law; Economic Justice; Trilogy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04958079287243488,"score_gpt":0.37466570438959873,"score_spread":0.32508491151716384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155556815","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03426624,0.10272566,0.000022972114,0.6825003,0.00054707594,0.0048074075,0.000022976588,0.000040393887,0.17506698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8168898,0.120973386,0.0005023427,0.029554928,0.0007230079,0.00057865464,0.000013433336,0.00006761738,0.030696832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99682957,0.0009348867,0.0005836,0.00047770428,0.00062520494,0.00054902595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935285,0.004631001,0.00029200772,0.0005078645,0.0008441729,0.00019647252],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001624816,0.00024519095,0.0006079469,0.000013921094,0.0020584704,0.0003839668,0.00091422314,0.000072992174,0.000120290744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013599102,0.0001369095,0.00013090303,0.0007057917,0.0003882324,0.00033667547,0.0008669291,0.00023962006,0.000040246643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015286497,0.0002069475,0.004037019,0.0023188894,0.0011899336,0.000025994055,0.27515233,0.0000861091,0.00028124548,0.46820867,0.19517425,0.05316574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015532185,0.00003350439,0.001353665,0.0014891642,0.00012237717,0.0000036943375,0.0019550181,0.000010383188,0.00010691953,0.0001858708,0.9943699,0.00021418686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23776439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6549307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79919565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105323874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001968906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157224595","doi":"10.24908/iqurcp.8280","title":"The Rule of Law: The Role of Judicial Review in Promoting Human Rights and Social Reform","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Legislation; Politics; Judicial review; Jurisdiction; Civil liberties; Legislature; Human rights; Substantive due process; Proportionality (law); Constitution; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.10440225751580771,"score_gpt":0.40907251074767415,"score_spread":0.3046702532318664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157224595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64997566,0.0027339207,0.0000020220862,0.25863677,0.000108837754,0.0023117943,0.000008644516,0.00005976614,0.08616258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99541444,0.0037553108,0.00001555607,0.0000322868,0.00028204816,0.000109545406,5.188163e-7,0.000009037688,0.00038127764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968366,0.0003201652,0.00053417357,0.0003043062,0.0013132214,0.00069150527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974663,0.00050505303,0.00029657953,0.00010278543,0.0015498016,0.000079442114],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055627283,0.00015174186,0.00036598713,0.000059782808,0.0028387082,0.00012483716,0.00072501623,0.00010907914,0.000010845513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069576374,0.00006871248,0.00007371607,0.00042716923,0.006210819,0.00043259937,0.00038530244,0.00038773075,0.0000047959743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021768363,0.000036385383,0.0012355279,0.00022262371,0.000033678065,4.7434736e-7,0.06284407,1.5798979e-9,0.003344003,0.92239916,0.00045649701,0.0094057815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006397676,0.00021243995,0.0045799143,0.0034981128,0.00003351846,0.0000010651136,0.0432845,0.0000049817686,0.005823652,0.8204482,0.12115502,0.0003188287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039204165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066981283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34543875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034660212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015605487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99845946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158761700","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3809777","title":"Indigenous Law and the Common Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Indigenous; Political science","score_opus":0.012246876931792813,"score_gpt":0.28393305057772517,"score_spread":0.27168617364593234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158761700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69960356,0.07102643,0.000053522985,0.05072278,0.00054917607,0.0004073835,0.0000029168114,0.0000786196,0.17755558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805598,0.015218299,0.000020598047,0.0012964926,0.00040202835,0.000004662126,7.1820733e-7,0.0000069091298,0.0024904471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750227,0.0004693317,0.00015812882,0.00011815522,0.00033001145,0.0014221311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946195,0.0001877071,0.00008554309,0.00007876225,0.000114011375,0.00007204527],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002009304,0.00009318258,0.00018030721,0.000006876995,0.003568726,0.00021595765,0.00020499437,0.000064902844,0.000027589405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078900855,0.000056757395,0.000089699955,0.00012217081,0.00087546447,0.00016757206,0.00006764738,0.001149555,0.000015300991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000144585565,0.000015024236,0.00031463828,0.0000011861249,0.00010106884,0.0000053514314,0.021120142,9.1770374e-7,0.000014178001,0.9755139,0.000040546634,0.0028586185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012849,0.000055310004,0.00049288187,0.00001301475,0.00007199144,0.00016333428,0.083180174,0.0000021041021,0.000061996354,0.7146581,0.19983171,0.00018453252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020675888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34736466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3266888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006324239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006610146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99772847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159254874","doi":"","title":"Le calcul des aliments du parent de fait : de I'approche synchronique à I'approche étapiste (Calculating the Support Paid by a De Facto Parent: Moving from a Synchronic to a Layered Approach)","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.018191170605091646,"score_gpt":0.2700757212274938,"score_spread":0.25188455062240217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159254874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9042318,0.019983873,0.059975374,0.010485848,0.00033612415,0.0016089147,0.000064752356,0.0001228073,0.0031904934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856027,0.0053173867,0.0026622792,0.000613156,0.0008722611,0.00021976979,0.000033918644,0.00010338684,0.0045751664],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98787355,0.0019303581,0.00095299864,0.0009063589,0.00110943,0.007227289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974524,0.00042837148,0.00068796816,0.00040222405,0.0002608272,0.00076822314],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005651436,0.00078418537,0.0008367514,0.00007159482,0.0031747618,0.00061898975,0.0014641533,0.00052968547,0.00023888318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059344724,0.00062791904,0.0006207665,0.00064726063,0.00071429374,0.00065808184,0.00047891348,0.0033696021,0.000117714255],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054811913,0.0026820516,0.16860384,0.00070255087,0.009113517,0.00006053232,0.58713675,0.0109766135,0.023641912,0.09703646,0.0067010517,0.09279661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0069399616,0.0023818167,0.017803237,0.001781839,0.00176816,0.001058664,0.7571824,0.030542193,0.001950268,0.08326073,0.09085902,0.0044716923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054013353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020652074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17004567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018016057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008542374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159890866","doi":"10.1017/cls.2020.24","title":"Pesky Polygamist Women: The Marginalization of Qualitative Data in British Columbia’s Charter Reference on Polygamy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Sociology; Supreme court; Sovereignty; Neutrality; Gender studies; Politics","score_opus":0.05389865457521155,"score_gpt":0.3255047132759811,"score_spread":0.27160605870076954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159890866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97827476,0.0014154767,0.000007212997,0.010066234,0.0003252666,0.00017896296,0.00041646796,0.0000043958053,0.009311243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921615,0.0009922716,0.000101313875,0.0031185704,0.00018202334,0.0000068556906,0.00003545937,0.000013143111,0.0033888672],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979484,0.0005321936,0.00045975804,0.00025990192,0.00020957804,0.00059017754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794483,0.00039191375,0.00032903466,0.00023400135,0.0005122467,0.000587976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022626754,0.00011285395,0.000415863,0.000019452404,0.0008635591,0.0003102254,0.0004738917,0.00015102485,0.00023664132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007492542,0.00013706228,0.00011347223,0.00029889875,0.0009521378,0.0003623582,0.000044571752,0.00043777833,7.836125e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060389416,0.00003777492,0.002877672,0.00008457021,0.00024540647,0.00015212383,0.8908788,0.0000052184087,0.000033515502,0.0957933,0.0072939787,0.0025916218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070050947,0.00009766898,0.021420589,0.0003590026,0.000055996494,0.000047548347,0.8514213,0.000023685581,0.0000034844622,0.005020625,0.12055563,0.0002939372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8335532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16322431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013136344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015107493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66418856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159972780","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Constitutionalism and Dispute Resolution Outside the Courts: An Invitation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Institution; Law; Indigenous rights; Political science; Liberalism; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Sociology; Human rights; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.02627497588717223,"score_gpt":0.299816302295311,"score_spread":0.2735413264081388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159972780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87865746,0.00979977,0.0035182845,0.10536492,0.00028916067,0.00048033133,0.000008292187,0.00008685762,0.0017948956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924626,0.005494757,0.00008091129,0.0010965681,0.000709306,0.000005806763,0.000004046488,0.000005171842,0.00014082759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998072,0.00030741334,0.00016553568,0.00013908578,0.00037219195,0.000943771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994947,0.00008521175,0.00012264049,0.000043433658,0.00012569438,0.00012834817],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013845948,0.00009054546,0.00010374025,0.000015404394,0.0026004508,0.0001467848,0.00017966243,0.00006122029,0.000008774281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037079433,0.0000605186,0.000043122738,0.000121706384,0.0004512902,0.000426348,0.000029425646,0.0007815073,0.000010981999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040538565,0.000028387727,0.0037728397,0.0000035260157,0.00013082715,0.00000332118,0.1275288,0.00010712067,0.00016633968,0.85589856,0.0005619949,0.011757744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00171611,0.0007741962,0.035641056,0.000038760736,0.00022575792,0.0001514939,0.3297592,0.0004816444,0.000029820638,0.42767385,0.20279092,0.00071719306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022531324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011422322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42822474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072279834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001035351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99869806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160128850","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3441656","title":"Conceptual Parallels in Judicial and Bar 'Independence' in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Parallels; Independence (probability theory); Bar (unit); Law; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Geography; Statistics; Engineering; Meteorology; Operations management","score_opus":0.015396554402689071,"score_gpt":0.277543492225502,"score_spread":0.26214693782281295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160128850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99109834,0.0020224955,0.000012021423,0.0033634566,0.00024295226,0.00013514144,0.0000012897316,0.0000061302817,0.0031181574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99613225,0.0027778784,0.000017779515,0.00016432529,0.00054020836,0.0000042142833,3.242511e-7,0.000005555817,0.00035743607],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969515,0.00022762068,0.00024609576,0.00017196954,0.00048102633,0.0019217865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999598,0.00008338401,0.00008547975,0.000043156113,0.000086455766,0.00010352483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015137207,0.00010961216,0.00019741479,0.00004057494,0.00056947063,0.000044325505,0.00021738064,0.00007877391,0.00010168501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026207167,0.000093813,0.000025345073,0.00019628448,0.0005013821,0.00022093309,0.000041804313,0.0011790108,0.000009261253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010581813,0.000048721035,0.5926511,0.0000024283963,0.00009188252,0.00005160599,0.059343155,0.000021068958,0.000072170005,0.3278003,0.0007168911,0.019094825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026451892,0.00035620996,0.27633417,0.00007003872,0.00002198815,0.000053666525,0.594741,0.000047685564,0.000034393728,0.100900725,0.02414187,0.00065308565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9768978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99973345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5353978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005193889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009064763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160588698","doi":"10.21991/cf29420","title":"Intersections and Roads Untravelled: Sex and Family Status in Fraser v Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Equity (law); Statute; High Court; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.017120867982033924,"score_gpt":0.2631981880009177,"score_spread":0.24607732001888377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160588698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8274869,0.010005705,0.003851389,0.023908127,0.0030856873,0.0009587085,0.0006207757,0.00016343076,0.1299193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962087,0.0010061079,0.00032818638,0.001278148,0.00008544478,0.000045100292,0.000040391184,0.0000052529745,0.0010026312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977852,0.00013883697,0.00038222724,0.00047806438,0.00044549015,0.0007701754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891126,0.0002672721,0.00008080457,0.00012736712,0.00028045403,0.00033281956],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023743883,0.0002399455,0.00031203736,0.00008683864,0.0022620435,0.00014159671,0.0001095117,0.00014427045,0.00012296508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074490573,0.00023813832,0.000059805272,0.00039736857,0.005213962,0.00043166755,0.00019383259,0.00029775416,0.000009249138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015179325,0.000048206784,0.22318633,0.000012804907,0.00007039975,0.0000815128,0.001321081,0.00015772512,0.00011229242,0.7695265,0.0038486642,0.0016193108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024319624,0.000029224895,0.08805051,0.00019293958,0.000055271186,0.00007706676,0.12974237,0.0002517646,0.00018426306,0.0071872105,0.77096635,0.00083108625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47245118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9292005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7671177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008136728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043114503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99903685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160687993","doi":"10.21991/cf29422","title":"The Alchemy of Equality Rights","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Politics; Character (mathematics); Test (biology); Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03775945820894088,"score_gpt":0.3221107729389199,"score_spread":0.284351314729979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160687993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030835502,0.01061578,0.022044448,0.07762408,0.006529729,0.001324376,0.00046463415,0.00039591402,0.85016555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99575686,0.00032398707,0.000746657,0.00042125687,0.00021579591,0.000053724354,0.00004146765,0.0000040779055,0.0024361478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702364,0.00028918553,0.0006248854,0.0003957166,0.00089104957,0.0007754913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972961,0.0007602751,0.0002513297,0.00032530396,0.0011550143,0.00021197708],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008132504,0.00023431594,0.0003410736,0.000039814397,0.007493754,0.00013888344,0.00044030615,0.00019436952,0.00029318573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018261366,0.0001699318,0.00032472427,0.00050737563,0.016961563,0.00047173133,0.00024403792,0.0002589089,0.0001309271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019801088,0.0000840384,0.0060091037,0.000009464133,0.00012626502,0.000010358157,0.00058485457,0.000050396025,0.00023063202,0.98577905,0.0064625945,0.00063342333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006262869,0.000013726678,0.0009682512,0.00007509049,0.000053151296,0.000023618602,0.011751564,0.000027458922,0.001951519,0.059918866,0.9242848,0.00030568012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017490442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070065632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96492136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037235353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002011155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160943048","doi":"10.21991/cf29418","title":"Cautious Optimism: Fraser v Canada (Attorney General)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Supreme court; Adverse possession; Watson; Adverse effect; Political science; Medicine; History","score_opus":0.020940815336034077,"score_gpt":0.2713530270220552,"score_spread":0.2504122116860211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160943048","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05061647,0.009649878,0.019910969,0.12601198,0.015061035,0.0016375401,0.0015512718,0.0008131876,0.77474767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98386425,0.0003765561,0.0023718437,0.0053227944,0.00063273666,0.00010187991,0.00024688907,0.000013193821,0.007069842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99595594,0.00021753361,0.00061174436,0.0007242207,0.0012070349,0.001283514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974977,0.0002592317,0.00018972185,0.00036019747,0.0011220381,0.0005711471],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032975676,0.0004157368,0.00047672435,0.00007183386,0.005694939,0.00022286957,0.00044479693,0.00028645684,0.0014701075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014779982,0.00041177496,0.00026336985,0.00062054297,0.0063344515,0.00065670256,0.00027144197,0.00041216757,0.00019470075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012696838,0.00007391814,0.011851486,0.000011045928,0.00014392438,0.00020674957,0.00025830665,0.0014883797,0.000097267824,0.89984494,0.0855696,0.00044167458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010008735,0.000011471912,0.0010841455,0.00007270763,0.00007119375,0.00006570501,0.010259646,0.00014663953,0.0004596141,0.0035096246,0.98265564,0.0006627155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37934133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81018716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9332478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002037293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014161754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161197987","doi":"10.21991/cf29421","title":"Critical Reflections on Fraser: What Equality Are We Seeking?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Charter; Constitution; Political science; Law; Reading (process); Politics","score_opus":0.09550983661906681,"score_gpt":0.39144068646995805,"score_spread":0.29593084985089124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161197987","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058082496,0.010358394,0.053192906,0.45716333,0.016411308,0.0012809493,0.0007151655,0.0012117699,0.45385793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98899907,0.0019073441,0.0011959457,0.0054246006,0.0006792448,0.00013242377,0.00008088441,0.000012357613,0.0015681243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956399,0.00047083577,0.0006457296,0.00085465173,0.0011913213,0.0011975556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649596,0.0010204025,0.000190291,0.00040900195,0.0013886692,0.0004956996],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006222402,0.0004148843,0.0005051243,0.00013002325,0.008443608,0.000765725,0.0003766903,0.0004044803,0.0011160886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004899184,0.0004041968,0.00042127108,0.0008110762,0.011744844,0.0020918988,0.00025706823,0.0006389569,0.00062953855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035192345,0.00029476598,0.0048021115,0.000025884394,0.00010539917,0.00007963042,0.00088345335,0.00020691991,0.000111072535,0.9821217,0.0104229525,0.00091090845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082584086,0.000041781266,0.00066819595,0.0006020358,0.00008578278,0.000044987428,0.087287046,0.000054315173,0.0003201445,0.042257097,0.8671474,0.0006653757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052634964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00672267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98319083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010760974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020963955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161629668","doi":"10.21991/cf29419","title":"The Elephant in the Room and Straw Men on Fire","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Privilege (computing); Charter; Law; Section (typography); Constitution; Political science; Sociology; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.02563228055779123,"score_gpt":0.2960249134474994,"score_spread":0.2703926328897082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161629668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12129773,0.013645457,0.0010112803,0.33995017,0.002627927,0.0020473488,0.00024744385,0.00021712384,0.5189555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99569064,0.0013168541,0.000089979265,0.0017110696,0.0001896317,0.000107489184,0.00002344866,0.0000039421516,0.0008669353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975095,0.00031640136,0.00036027783,0.00038449932,0.0007133279,0.0007160403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832165,0.0009764067,0.00009978207,0.00023654557,0.00024330967,0.00012232542],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085404975,0.00022403542,0.00021619322,0.00003225651,0.006810368,0.0003458309,0.00038390968,0.00014268236,0.00007562625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013717952,0.00013484071,0.00012594216,0.00040248098,0.00704882,0.0003517867,0.00014391853,0.00036583637,0.00005945116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020460951,0.000067635505,0.0077230195,0.0000040766586,0.000041041654,0.00004141602,0.0013325873,0.0000790933,0.000029769217,0.98014283,0.0083514685,0.0021666274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010732717,0.000044531767,0.010191442,0.00013035125,0.000040288214,0.0000779962,0.090617,0.00016862732,0.00009496277,0.029218316,0.8679406,0.00040260886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008867286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007672385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9509245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029495236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009988322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99565345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161683840","doi":"","title":"The Tin Ear of the Court: Ktunaxa Nation and the Foundations of the Duty to Consult","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Duty; Political science; Sovereignty; Jurisprudence; Jurisdiction; Politics","score_opus":0.011408855796055257,"score_gpt":0.28214282333197027,"score_spread":0.270733967535915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161683840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9114748,0.0012741149,0.000025458363,0.08129635,0.00041649747,0.0006378272,0.000003145666,0.0000055734895,0.004866189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99406534,0.0015999671,0.000006914222,0.00012155222,0.000109047614,0.0000063315765,1.1434345e-7,0.00000389603,0.00408684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819946,0.0004928467,0.0002148179,0.00007528178,0.00048112005,0.0005364735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867374,0.00059194525,0.00028060595,0.0001355218,0.00029448868,0.000023703058],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031141797,0.00006824952,0.00011661444,0.000009752574,0.0020582508,0.00006721671,0.00048349384,0.00003798821,0.00001773933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00115305,0.000024585011,0.00010326383,0.00025438238,0.00075908564,0.000082344384,0.00009514886,0.0005840082,0.0000078282965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066356086,0.000020541516,0.013637252,0.0000033721299,0.00018304678,1.7975987e-8,0.026277607,0.000040225757,0.00035259765,0.9545343,0.00051745505,0.0043672505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004194176,0.00025365685,0.1927835,0.00014591843,0.00032017325,0.00002794412,0.30947796,0.0002025939,0.00094600685,0.32310164,0.1681493,0.00039714534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023448674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024779562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63143265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000335297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007154651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163005898","doi":"","title":"Canada's Residential Schools and the Right to Family Integrity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Intervention (counseling); Genocide; Political science; Law; State (computer science); International law; Geography; Psychology","score_opus":0.011060360617047287,"score_gpt":0.2826294818024169,"score_spread":0.27156912118536963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163005898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85506684,0.0032414845,0.00030225766,0.12719513,0.00087301474,0.00041039163,0.000004009001,0.000030121882,0.0128767425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916828,0.0016536284,0.000051932373,0.0010163083,0.001648165,0.0000060373827,2.0101508e-7,0.000006053292,0.0039348197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971563,0.00038086725,0.00018899112,0.00015515185,0.0005487596,0.0015699173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928516,0.00011939383,0.00008650536,0.00008428472,0.00026495443,0.00015970488],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029587823,0.00010983204,0.00016820803,0.000022109878,0.0027435164,0.00020381145,0.00038138364,0.000057892892,0.000042247604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008722621,0.00006245697,0.00005478402,0.0001901679,0.0004883961,0.0001550463,0.000083217834,0.0015549205,0.000024681067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031334473,0.000021217556,0.0037153945,0.0000027605702,0.000377372,0.0000073080364,0.01588928,0.0000011066444,0.00021348574,0.90113276,0.065199465,0.013126501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021770739,0.00025643467,0.034210462,0.00004973118,0.00011387755,0.000053107316,0.110336676,0.000009620119,0.00012816479,0.24382812,0.60834014,0.0004965746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9180638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65730464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020387222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00547853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99855477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163258748","doi":"","title":"La notion de 'choix' dans la décision de se marier ou non au Québec (The Notion of ‘Choice’ in the Decision to Marry or Not in Quebec)","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031920291891909466,"score_gpt":0.3196503531178292,"score_spread":0.2877300612259197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163258748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789147,0.0009760078,0.0033678073,0.014092253,0.00033249677,0.0004585578,0.0000030148544,0.000009161843,0.0018460084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918536,0.0023628823,0.00035505198,0.00028409803,0.0003977921,0.000027735055,8.853695e-7,0.000020760304,0.004697172],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940652,0.0022635588,0.0006464055,0.0002836889,0.0007236083,0.0020174843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975832,0.0016257014,0.00031854093,0.00020272368,0.00014325636,0.00012655949],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010734518,0.00026408696,0.0003245263,0.0001258591,0.00075971184,0.00010104325,0.0008001956,0.0003475482,0.00006059554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016920051,0.00015521822,0.00020061819,0.0008672216,0.00049427815,0.00050594064,0.00011389898,0.00235517,0.000035960715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011641838,0.00059013016,0.07356825,0.000026379945,0.00010618868,0.00003885596,0.5404335,0.000625219,0.0010934502,0.014412963,0.00022152797,0.3677193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012707711,0.0004571857,0.8495359,0.00039597403,0.00011058565,0.00011303405,0.120209016,0.00036790557,0.00016096827,0.00925433,0.017799202,0.00032514817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9092725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77596766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0114130145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005551594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163377589","doi":"10.3968/12007","title":"Culture and the Childs Right: The Many Ways Most Cultures Abuse the Rights of the Child","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child abuse; Order (exchange); Political science; Child protection; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Medicine; Poison control; Business; Suicide prevention; Medical emergency; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017489588172796913,"score_gpt":0.32516840125184737,"score_spread":0.3076788130790505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163377589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76279587,0.024231492,0.0000035439039,0.13190052,0.0004125521,0.0015770852,0.000052178253,0.000108250744,0.07891854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876288,0.0059644086,0.00006858374,0.0011699782,0.00023846683,0.000083484614,0.000028004002,0.000008831942,0.0048094317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718225,0.0012201342,0.00039410716,0.00025655198,0.0006165052,0.0003304326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969774,0.0005400603,0.00037237903,0.0011549664,0.0009015865,0.000053634387],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009835783,0.00024692158,0.00027035645,0.0000063139805,0.015713077,0.0009460651,0.0021242022,0.00017761711,0.0000560926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000743219,0.0000739723,0.00025268717,0.0005705917,0.008281958,0.00052055204,0.00064636895,0.0007910726,0.000011831788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004231969,0.00007277775,0.0015593969,0.000015898295,0.00021549473,5.439661e-7,0.41666657,0.000035946563,0.00034971876,0.56715053,0.01320813,0.0006826856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009982273,0.0000107388205,0.067922,0.00010830325,0.000150107,0.000015641192,0.048826955,0.000042982458,0.0017070377,0.0092011085,0.87075967,0.00025723077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005084215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01772658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8575515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106262465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035281035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99441695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163692583","doi":"","title":"The Future of Canadian Universal Health Care System: A Contextual Analysis of Section 7 of the Charter and Chaoulli","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Government (linguistics); Health care; Political science; Social security; Supreme court; Dignity; Public administration; Statute; Law; Business","score_opus":0.010055480779841607,"score_gpt":0.24831825573359295,"score_spread":0.23826277495375134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163692583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9303399,0.026981205,0.0000247154,0.041191973,0.00029006958,0.00029384365,0.000036814625,0.000007671692,0.0008338614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99396396,0.0056725247,0.0000021059147,0.00005693491,0.00023987952,7.508169e-7,7.885971e-7,0.0000028519369,0.000060220485],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985804,0.0002845852,0.00021195618,0.00007866182,0.00026967723,0.00057472935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927795,0.000041183033,0.00031062012,0.000054529097,0.0002148568,0.000100881196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006584998,0.00006399658,0.00023418332,0.00006831305,0.0009179596,0.000014216175,0.0001916523,0.000049443242,0.00000429018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038625123,0.000035432015,0.00013990838,0.0008074146,0.00023188566,0.000056835244,0.000018318979,0.00042472495,1.2810632e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009603439,0.000015108048,0.039671317,0.000086244014,0.0037284412,7.056069e-7,0.5029119,0.00007199313,0.0001657249,0.4360531,0.0005520565,0.016647367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002484039,0.00016063638,0.018848607,0.000020684683,0.00027936435,0.000002163493,0.96532446,0.0000458556,0.000015965119,0.00006682308,0.014929668,0.000057339385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29007074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93715465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6470839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008829158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018433955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7146568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163824935","doi":"10.1177/0040571x211008547","title":"The Anglican Church’s sexual abuse defence playbook","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Offensive; Restitution; Sexual abuse; Law; Mythology; Criminology; Sexual assault; Adversarial system; Child sexual abuse; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Theology; Philosophy; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Engineering; Medicine; Operations research","score_opus":0.02846498285129907,"score_gpt":0.3120243863349221,"score_spread":0.283559403483623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163824935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8051094,0.0014818807,0.000021246264,0.012548373,0.0005590627,0.0001486651,0.0000033873966,0.00010418592,0.1800238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95890236,0.00050059316,0.00011346311,0.00087956554,0.00038748988,0.000026193364,0.0000018582814,0.000005928957,0.039182577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985978,0.0004746115,0.00012127105,0.00019421516,0.00019710987,0.0004149923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988008,0.0007663645,0.000051658044,0.00017723508,0.00013173145,0.00007218958],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046588996,0.000084720145,0.00013291466,0.000007195216,0.001532576,0.00004427005,0.00031225648,0.00008836571,0.00042605496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006560772,0.00005401058,0.000041219235,0.00014506519,0.00140361,0.000062137704,0.00010330824,0.00015902914,0.00019471494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031005216,0.000048162794,0.00759451,0.000004654624,0.000106548454,0.00008203298,0.1623029,0.000007206831,0.0014043344,0.80195147,0.016878057,0.009589142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002908908,0.00005449826,0.01753109,0.0000051528314,0.000027939072,0.000014686139,0.07143809,0.000011130934,0.00037245502,0.013500442,0.8965108,0.00024282535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013893391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010602355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8796328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008187802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009494491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164391389","doi":"10.46692/9781529200638.007","title":"The Westminster Model as a Constitutional Archetype","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Archetype; Political science; Computer science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.058794835931678065,"score_gpt":0.3383508699275056,"score_spread":0.27955603399582757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164391389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002130151,0.00079139473,0.00025151038,0.016900998,0.00031313466,0.00032733707,0.000016961032,0.00021414642,0.9811824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017719716,0.0010208286,0.0012405828,0.0012385609,0.0007088531,0.000029930225,0.0000057299717,0.00003835923,0.9939452],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988909,0.000073518495,0.00011171795,0.00020497855,0.00046245145,0.00025645364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958116,0.00010556901,0.00007395784,0.0000934311,0.00003742891,0.00010844909],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001323049,0.0001475127,0.00015965165,0.000011907404,0.0008581494,0.00009505467,0.0003155948,0.0001800717,0.00298601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002277751,0.00008163525,0.00009720244,0.000083278486,0.0025132988,0.000031051357,0.00010424229,0.00019366817,0.001666091],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019906365,0.0000039698125,0.000012907532,0.0000027634817,0.000043284857,0.0000011627469,0.0014254772,0.0000028446555,7.561377e-7,0.40434042,0.5937416,0.0004228234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007085103,0.000005846494,0.0000048851593,0.000017714741,0.000015328782,2.1561294e-7,0.001475432,0.000087049855,5.4631363e-7,0.0011062663,0.99707824,0.0001376075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006429068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011707867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40333667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009628071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031341345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164599838","doi":"","title":"Positive Freedoms and Peaceful Assemblies: Reenvisioning Section 2(c) of the Charter","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Statute; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Legislature; Veto; Section (typography); Law and economics; Scope (computer science); Constitution; Politics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.015084180091001936,"score_gpt":0.2695220312426068,"score_spread":0.2544378511516049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164599838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9586538,0.002345404,0.0005037664,0.034835268,0.00025393208,0.0001909732,0.000001963599,0.000022927616,0.0031919298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99637294,0.0022320761,0.0000258071,0.00021595752,0.0006802248,0.0000016768226,2.4797345e-7,0.000006265765,0.0004647877],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984102,0.000234358,0.00016543889,0.00012527932,0.0003060151,0.00075867906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995105,0.00008742625,0.00016815285,0.000044513876,0.00011644609,0.00007294737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089039624,0.00008655429,0.00013668429,0.000015237489,0.0010966425,0.000058095346,0.00018286008,0.000062581596,0.0000190487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003732819,0.000054560027,0.000089773916,0.00020237525,0.0002499851,0.00022142005,0.00006415719,0.00091841683,0.0000032554024],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026900021,0.00012987782,0.09505465,0.00003811479,0.0012199783,0.0000037281636,0.46988657,0.0000848635,0.018629482,0.36212927,0.0027882105,0.04976625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026936447,0.0014693796,0.23107994,0.0002616289,0.00031015294,0.00009766673,0.6741154,0.00032706952,0.0012219652,0.04848059,0.03908414,0.0008583888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012030212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032166538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3136487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040017892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8434598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165876900","doi":"10.1080/07481187.2021.1926631","title":"Assistance in dying: A comparative look at legal definitions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Death Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Confusion; Terminology; Death with dignity; Diversity (politics); Glossary; Action (physics); Foundation (evidence); Sociology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.24617645618702466,"score_gpt":0.4090427128091024,"score_spread":0.16286625662207777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165876900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8288494,0.018690897,0.0000068625222,0.005794674,0.000356964,0.00022955259,0.000019655656,0.00009055813,0.14596148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99014205,0.002995289,0.0005856446,0.00022192592,0.0001125095,0.000103813465,0.0000057284783,0.000005161627,0.005827872],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852,0.00023202879,0.00022746768,0.00029806848,0.00033712693,0.00038527796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897015,0.00047168988,0.00007212507,0.00010219569,0.0003238112,0.0000600265],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022264423,0.00014983982,0.00040235347,0.000027276858,0.0015778814,0.00007015618,0.00010920565,0.000052769352,0.00006934817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052430364,0.0001280657,0.0000827599,0.00037041173,0.0004764178,0.00018567957,0.00019965929,0.00014235964,0.00010726634],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003400745,0.00026058752,0.21307,0.0000536312,0.0005470884,0.00028032798,0.48623368,0.00004525182,0.00023310789,0.28671914,0.01228017,0.00024301301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087505614,0.000035064975,0.20066467,0.00017895918,0.00007890321,0.0000027174435,0.52383816,0.0000141034325,0.00045880914,0.0034920222,0.2698042,0.0005572858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015606565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09240476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28322712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007087265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007901659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168215178","doi":"","title":"Marshalling Principles From the Marshall Morass","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Treaty; Jurisprudence; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Political science; Divergence (linguistics); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02789135202315932,"score_gpt":0.28682792279353686,"score_spread":0.2589365707703775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168215178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94044113,0.010195827,0.00009192111,0.020365585,0.00025062682,0.00023720661,0.00000590035,0.00008438598,0.02832743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95547,0.027606597,0.00013400774,0.00033452216,0.0015820368,0.0000081987355,0.0000027142814,0.000015865538,0.014846003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632865,0.0003697331,0.00026905118,0.00020678023,0.0005958996,0.0022298824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926394,0.00028029017,0.000122048536,0.00013610866,0.00009211402,0.000105492414],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022104534,0.00016015333,0.00017985601,0.000014104961,0.0023541169,0.00022501659,0.0006923949,0.00009935258,0.0011367634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020766453,0.000100242585,0.0001616879,0.00017852147,0.00025341046,0.0002712587,0.000044798904,0.0015520223,0.00024791854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001279992,0.00018907747,0.06710883,0.000004490437,0.0012024484,0.000023177045,0.06288731,0.0004935036,0.00018040037,0.5276744,0.0021090542,0.3379993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077449734,0.00008717445,0.034703724,0.000056689012,0.00011831697,0.000027336906,0.06890111,0.00008860082,0.000019121551,0.20939405,0.685316,0.0005133266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012474237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055216566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.683207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013428914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083168346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168578458","doi":"","title":"Turning Feminist Judgments into Jurisprudence: The Women's Court of Canada on Substantive Equality","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Tribunal; Humanities; Context (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.01642728054762735,"score_gpt":0.31040072794758955,"score_spread":0.29397344739996223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168578458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98144335,0.0004898349,0.000051462164,0.0057705306,0.0005109208,0.00017233395,0.0000032981463,0.000014198835,0.011544102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964767,0.00060139725,0.0000141345645,0.00034123487,0.0005938195,0.000007880442,3.6314333e-7,0.000008540661,0.0019559264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.995989,0.0004075975,0.000316774,0.00017748305,0.0010554476,0.0020536592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881035,0.0002701064,0.00035264547,0.00012180871,0.000319459,0.00012564649],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041862656,0.00014905682,0.00022474809,0.000022372436,0.0027980332,0.00006949132,0.00055321545,0.00006527389,0.00008346717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000588462,0.00009429236,0.000070677284,0.00027636698,0.00071547105,0.00011624086,0.00005822526,0.0011259806,0.000008682368],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003770956,0.00018340269,0.025458196,0.000017996135,0.001039142,0.0000076214724,0.3888729,0.00001829637,0.00087061257,0.56679547,0.0055052973,0.010853961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094683847,0.0009832724,0.016147785,0.00010851684,0.00006401127,0.000012396773,0.7895561,0.000014157729,0.0010827279,0.09814519,0.092400946,0.0005380893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29520786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8673227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5721148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006525786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053101266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99850017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168666551","doi":"10.26180/14586411.v1","title":"Providing effectively for Indigenous customary law : New Zealand, Canada and Australia and Indigenous customary adoptions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Customary land; Customary international law; Indigenous rights; Political science; Geography; Law; International law; Ecology; Agriculture; Biology; Land tenure","score_opus":0.038603736558887165,"score_gpt":0.3139306713094176,"score_spread":0.27532693475053044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168666551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80206734,0.008904821,1.4731107e-7,0.00034578086,0.0010715331,0.0070286742,0.17656521,0.0002374077,0.003779096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56149405,0.00034542492,0.00032687307,0.00035206086,0.0019166744,0.00248108,0.32515058,0.0001478886,0.10778536],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980672,0.0001178292,0.0002575002,0.0005196698,0.00043056146,0.0006072311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985637,0.00043766873,0.00025166394,0.00011441516,0.0003204638,0.0003121025],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009538002,0.00036004107,0.00045900833,0.00004681552,0.002241588,0.00027841105,0.00020684596,0.00044987988,0.0019917856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007930012,0.000346482,0.000095622156,0.00019743516,0.00003434694,0.00023002406,0.00006939132,0.00037570178,0.00001641653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011633077,0.00008845995,0.003959921,0.0037113165,0.00073768344,0.00016060288,0.32750273,0.0000061595783,0.00008879376,0.0001844164,0.64320135,0.020242196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000888241,0.00014996971,0.16995326,0.0035246245,0.00030290982,0.00001046019,0.033988647,0.000001617178,0.00024158307,0.00010469526,0.7894587,0.0013753067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91493577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99207866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2935141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068587303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018841036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168754267","doi":"","title":"All Families Are Equal, But Do Some Matter More than Others? How Gender, Poverty, and Domestic Violence Put Quebec's Family Law Reform to the Test","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Poverty; Test (biology); Political science; Family law; Sociology; Law; Criminology; Gender studies; Demographic economics; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Environmental health; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.023581867726911992,"score_gpt":0.27996540027198735,"score_spread":0.25638353254507534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168754267","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9302827,0.0028545905,0.000005920694,0.0392118,0.0006428908,0.0012442257,0.00012249744,0.00019075935,0.025444593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96501905,0.000783805,0.00014881628,0.024747718,0.000503789,0.00009546447,0.000005237137,0.00003814396,0.0086579975],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971461,0.00019024388,0.0002806942,0.0006608328,0.00085722253,0.00086486887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983628,0.0003982361,0.00017933077,0.0005314768,0.00016445848,0.00036371758],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051791465,0.00039529806,0.00044964676,0.000033856973,0.0012152535,0.0008115525,0.0008013828,0.00020944147,0.00015781986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024230253,0.00024856583,0.00014064182,0.00022457121,0.0007598741,0.0009586318,0.0004182933,0.00040367368,0.0012637804],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018901986,0.00047088743,0.5104187,0.00057645526,0.00073470874,0.00010817426,0.12838009,0.000090532296,0.008341509,0.26387224,0.08400841,0.0028092721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011461647,0.0001549879,0.356329,0.0005132147,0.000114849856,0.0000074597424,0.18788813,0.000019334713,0.0002491742,0.0053355186,0.44683823,0.0014039344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24650653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12285972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36282983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055808254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006354406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169247029","doi":"","title":"The Busy Harbours of Canadian Federalism: The Division of Powers and its Doctrines in the McLachlin Court","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Federalism; Law; Jurisprudence; Legislation; Humanities; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013074065497042464,"score_gpt":0.28294566884822775,"score_spread":0.26987160335118526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169247029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92098963,0.0037045588,0.0000013443344,0.07308444,0.00021855292,0.00021319649,0.0000023044242,0.0000032342014,0.0017827424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99040854,0.00898018,0.0000040775735,0.00010150838,0.00014632563,0.000003996814,2.573928e-7,0.0000045063607,0.00035061038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782073,0.00030692972,0.00023467041,0.000090556285,0.0004287396,0.0011183497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909794,0.0004022383,0.00017509398,0.000094452655,0.00016023686,0.00007004557],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048027933,0.0000946211,0.00013848966,0.000060812195,0.0018532713,0.00010436693,0.0005615253,0.00006998386,0.0000092564815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006038744,0.00004078186,0.00006969049,0.00034956695,0.0004381354,0.00011878462,0.000030175308,0.0012920368,0.0000011139995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003516065,0.000043518903,0.032838434,0.000006441019,0.00016177441,0.0000026186178,0.06274011,0.000012056035,0.001238696,0.8907936,0.0010611915,0.011066347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013959894,0.00033225646,0.28847337,0.00007714846,0.00010448338,0.000061012906,0.5007079,0.00009334107,0.0003553212,0.08745835,0.12049464,0.0004461299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28805187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9594705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8033353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023070873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010851112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169659597","doi":"","title":"Competing Arguments in Carter v. Canada (2015): How the Supreme Court of Canada's Ruling Constitutionally Upholds Charter Rights and Reflects Societal Values","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Terminally ill; Criminal code; Sociology; Criminal law; Palliative care; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.02151340305161071,"score_gpt":0.2756215907359712,"score_spread":0.2541081876843605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169659597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9452204,0.00051692454,0.000003845553,0.035677463,0.00040196982,0.00020179029,0.000028031687,0.000011739641,0.017937839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99672836,0.000028040982,0.00018740661,0.0005898422,0.00009808444,0.0000070160063,0.000006676213,0.000003164224,0.0023513818],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983724,0.0001849068,0.00019259409,0.00020853998,0.0006751449,0.0003664147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992228,0.0002521712,0.00008162668,0.00008220768,0.0002688493,0.000092339105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038125223,0.00012124938,0.00021706076,0.0000087489225,0.0010072014,0.00007025018,0.00013486763,0.000051192335,0.0000963112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015618515,0.00008055763,0.00003452465,0.00013272089,0.00041319057,0.000116137104,0.00007287388,0.00013875523,3.33968e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047764657,0.00024297116,0.35232967,0.00023891313,0.0012946477,0.00047571622,0.23928772,0.00026715026,0.009257837,0.0684183,0.327379,0.00076032354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028118985,0.000050402068,0.34313947,0.00042443836,0.00015876873,0.00002428067,0.30521294,0.0008015857,0.007663468,0.0020491558,0.33616918,0.0014944013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066369146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006198029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021453523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7746681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170297720","doi":"","title":"Are Members of the Clergy Without the Law? Hart v Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of the Diocese of Kingston","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Law; Political science; Theology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.02170633414077549,"score_gpt":0.28034958728406817,"score_spread":0.2586432531432927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170297720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96988374,0.00007429192,0.0000103395005,0.010205619,0.0005186867,0.0002440522,0.000007094374,0.000009297249,0.019046895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989603,0.000032722706,0.000060489183,0.0002550991,0.00029106732,0.0000045553666,2.8333878e-7,0.000008609629,0.00038688583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976131,0.0008262359,0.00041309313,0.00011116219,0.0008126441,0.00022378133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773866,0.00015623486,0.0014597954,0.00023135074,0.00035625213,0.000057720492],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012737727,0.00012378368,0.00028252325,0.000012076673,0.0016641957,0.00005690688,0.00065061834,0.00008183316,0.00003720292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040863556,0.0000541189,0.00023215174,0.00022423858,0.0018788741,0.0002216633,0.00011374657,0.0003105456,0.0000014087707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007602313,0.0001623376,0.15131691,0.00007342708,0.00024042334,0.0000013783397,0.12947015,0.0008178373,0.0032544252,0.7116914,0.0022121833,0.00068352453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016359485,0.00022636031,0.7284196,0.0009039692,0.00039647872,0.000020515978,0.058386974,0.00014610786,0.0219538,0.012738531,0.17464897,0.00052270596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042771015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055733595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69895285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009645384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005230826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170699339","doi":"10.1017/9781108614252.005","title":"The Nature of Divine Commands in Classical Legal Theory","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.018298356734868217,"score_gpt":0.24162850988795845,"score_spread":0.22333015315309024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170699339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000800633,0.000710297,0.000005379079,0.00048884813,0.00040495352,0.0004952508,0.00009043825,0.00003651059,0.9969677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06475223,0.00052443024,0.000007334282,0.00004562066,0.00015608351,5.3861095e-7,0.00000856643,0.000015603275,0.9344896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845165,0.00023001272,0.00019444058,0.00030101955,0.0004922143,0.0003306687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984483,0.0007179151,0.00023720314,0.00031230782,0.00019544057,0.0000888273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047974984,0.00024855544,0.0004293834,0.000055615114,0.0006806583,0.000048917336,0.00081822666,0.00066699326,0.0000057789975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000103102604,0.00019226864,0.00023831328,0.000015212084,0.0016192496,0.000095637624,0.0004953947,0.0011071654,0.0000073613064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105700856,0.000008404744,0.000032416225,0.000025474077,0.00010490367,0.00002925766,0.00094417814,6.3730766e-7,0.0000075802977,0.9821065,0.016094048,0.0005408723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037528598,0.000026421616,0.00049968256,0.00011791279,0.00007708211,4.383581e-7,0.0013522637,0.0000029864439,0.000022223403,0.00006599397,0.99722636,0.00023333685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016387666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008833105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9820405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003906409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017291063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78404874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170839569","doi":"10.21991/cf29374","title":"The Constitution of Canada as Supreme Law: A New Definition","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.024256995596565196,"score_gpt":0.26270637281413517,"score_spread":0.23844937721756998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170839569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02373245,0.0023550943,0.0024848718,0.033478387,0.0055290014,0.001750584,0.00022892193,0.00018913815,0.93025154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948686,0.00022160255,0.00039467512,0.0012302147,0.00020172834,0.000047040812,0.00005745285,0.0000065606546,0.0029721383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644274,0.0001704928,0.0006998724,0.00044567868,0.001249451,0.0009917689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975409,0.00070513145,0.00034646588,0.0003406074,0.00070823263,0.00035868865],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060661236,0.00032216805,0.00039884288,0.00006002144,0.0051594647,0.00014723155,0.00053908443,0.00021541734,0.0006084815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012799934,0.00025418797,0.00023019832,0.00041491326,0.010786135,0.0007238335,0.00016719483,0.00031616088,0.00028336298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006788054,0.000035165605,0.0062739183,0.000013197081,0.000107003754,0.0000059563426,0.00031413132,0.00028166888,0.00017215496,0.97659075,0.015834086,0.00030406236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012470619,0.000052582403,0.0005868599,0.00015815513,0.000059271275,0.000041815176,0.012142515,0.00004051748,0.00048866845,0.07051747,0.914203,0.00046210893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5521918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7103733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97113615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011187053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012721272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174183552","doi":"10.21307/borderlands-2020-011","title":"Creative Sovereignties and Fiscal Relations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Borderlands Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Erasmus+; University of Pittsburgh","keywords":"Treaty; Colonialism; Sovereignty; Indigenous; Decolonization; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Politics; Political economy; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03675089567462383,"score_gpt":0.3109365581570146,"score_spread":0.2741856624823908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174183552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46697384,0.0036548648,0.00097062596,0.13691927,0.00034065725,0.0002827988,0.000020766864,0.00013785946,0.3906993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950773,0.0007281318,0.00070427445,0.00038962156,0.0006658096,0.0000022441598,0.0000011280683,0.000004849135,0.002426644],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992181,0.0001144543,0.0001346495,0.00009504791,0.0002524956,0.00018522667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951625,0.00009173964,0.00007495251,0.000022480885,0.00009313968,0.00020146194],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001810439,0.00007371465,0.00012309583,0.000014113271,0.0015413864,0.00017244605,0.000084263855,0.000054686134,0.0005796349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061186805,0.00005472773,0.000047832968,0.000114114926,0.00022490053,0.0002680653,0.000035790414,0.00023338672,0.000024050145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001058249,0.000060399154,0.30066505,0.00001628163,0.00029980874,0.000048754155,0.47117046,0.000042640208,0.00008786582,0.06383387,0.14730275,0.016366296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012695177,0.0001880174,0.2712147,0.00003818475,0.000079306265,0.000017964841,0.11331765,0.00018180012,0.000015428908,0.008764849,0.6045571,0.00035545684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029059144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018925844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5281035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004551398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051528674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174232670","doi":"","title":"Laws of the Constitution: Consolidated","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04721913213972048,"score_gpt":0.3053782896867626,"score_spread":0.2581591575470421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174232670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000020029858,0.00038232486,0.000003221028,0.009325835,0.0005514571,0.00043389644,0.000042863663,0.0000768182,0.9891636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01876005,0.00022628476,0.00006629686,0.00065187126,0.00038995285,0.0000069869448,0.000009575416,0.000005207287,0.9798838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998877,0.00011264451,0.00022040877,0.00017025963,0.00045702455,0.00016270104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992731,0.00013659483,0.00019153874,0.00012675086,0.00020576008,0.00006625953],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012904125,0.00013735423,0.00030131868,0.000008082143,0.0006254532,0.00002864266,0.00039546116,0.00022991654,0.001268763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032556814,0.00007881794,0.00017516784,0.00010462925,0.002699481,0.000047895235,0.0001621054,0.00024200762,0.0001715247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020958996,0.000004652373,0.000045660414,0.000017858643,0.00006968339,0.0000011874812,0.004426025,3.6545498e-7,0.000006477039,0.5824603,0.4128266,0.00013911034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083019004,0.0000057642774,0.000065394095,0.0000533245,0.000052393858,1.9732884e-7,0.0013710072,4.648418e-7,0.00003946131,0.0015080982,0.9967062,0.0001146629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002001684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026014335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5838796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022348679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008007585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175327714","doi":"","title":"All guides: First Nations - Student Guide: Law and Rights","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04274688583406208,"score_gpt":0.36333280824357533,"score_spread":0.3205859224095132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175327714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002694414,0.007052053,0.000005405951,0.023104561,0.0018388272,0.00068907667,0.000084179446,0.00025161024,0.96670485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012881152,0.029059913,0.0044062734,0.006454454,0.0044530076,0.00027031937,0.00036992753,0.00006261097,0.94204235],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967812,0.00023292938,0.0005978356,0.00065673236,0.0011551352,0.0005762186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759966,0.0010523999,0.00021391244,0.00028048496,0.00061121874,0.00024231264],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054752274,0.00039695663,0.00059729855,0.00007254633,0.0044448418,0.00065082486,0.0005787625,0.0004966587,0.0018627474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008322017,0.00029715215,0.00020601755,0.00029937093,0.00092292635,0.00029469206,0.00048720703,0.00033212244,0.00010839762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.500636e-7,0.000054230193,0.00016704587,0.000058252735,0.0003098318,0.000021807224,0.018406764,0.0000015023139,6.003676e-7,0.22882104,0.75209785,0.000060449795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018031908,0.0000144975365,0.00044435027,0.00016889726,0.00013061948,0.00000107922,0.010842875,0.0000010006485,0.0000057987486,0.0007759172,0.98699784,0.00043683063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24379532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79102814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5472328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005666092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001582944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175366073","doi":"","title":"Navigating Potentially Conflicting Political Rationalities: Discursive Strategies About “Family” in Alberta’s Child Welfare Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.015288723231851025,"score_gpt":0.315747726805006,"score_spread":0.30045900357315497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175366073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5905117,0.0002174242,0.000010929902,0.03388965,0.001002227,0.00059489306,0.000053377516,0.0001488266,0.373571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996041,0.000015475012,0.00062667415,0.0013687891,0.0012005637,0.00007568896,0.00004667529,0.000025699743,0.00059944164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690926,0.00028528503,0.0005341799,0.00048825296,0.00074891624,0.0010341239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851745,0.0004195527,0.00016972698,0.00022511427,0.00027224308,0.0003958946],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059755356,0.00029871656,0.00038108093,0.000017092289,0.00330906,0.00072775915,0.0004506333,0.00028144193,0.0005077982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008982871,0.00026418408,0.00016500495,0.0002196823,0.00139334,0.0011943348,0.00014649854,0.0013140148,0.00011409026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008173513,0.000044609165,0.0026930205,0.000020275289,0.000033651428,0.000008766382,0.016040776,0.000022395508,0.00024039368,0.9807204,0.000049900205,0.00011766217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001785152,0.00007909301,0.055507272,0.00057174714,0.000077513876,0.000009747684,0.4320384,0.000051011288,0.00047970482,0.026390573,0.4815185,0.0014912782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5470124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65152353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9543298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023847412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001372452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176248194","doi":"10.3138/ijcs.58.x.73","title":"The Duty to Consult and Reconciliation: The Supreme Court’s Idea of the Purpose and Practice of Consulting Indigenous Peoples","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Duty; Law; Supreme court; Obligation; Political science; Context (archaeology); Sovereignty; High Court; Constitution; Sociology; History; Politics","score_opus":0.050862232890812376,"score_gpt":0.34747842360679887,"score_spread":0.2966161907159865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176248194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78892064,0.018700713,0.0000019464933,0.18843894,0.000912401,0.00021374079,0.000048837715,0.0000019988113,0.002760799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98838603,0.0102580935,0.0001981216,0.00069010025,0.00017500906,0.0000037869986,2.0569468e-7,0.000002999498,0.00028566993],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984977,0.00033093046,0.00038787638,0.00007721652,0.0005577987,0.00014848151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99145293,0.0040363823,0.00049483124,0.00006516801,0.0038623323,0.000088371475],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014373068,0.0000729322,0.00018235506,0.00005263084,0.0009537397,0.000088359746,0.0002910252,0.000029538975,0.0000058848996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023364222,0.000037600203,0.000053762917,0.00022501024,0.0007499224,0.00015171983,0.000094581774,0.00013409663,4.059357e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013586775,0.00003737398,0.0835857,0.000031953066,0.0029908838,0.000054855926,0.85819584,0.00004938868,0.00053352135,0.022727419,0.011061932,0.02059525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003875046,0.00003761919,0.121094406,0.00016239377,0.00011589037,0.000101810576,0.6331303,0.0000018141759,0.0003172767,0.00041589516,0.24414676,0.000088299166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070510454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70072377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6302133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022181123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077236485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9848624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176523456","doi":"","title":"Book Review of Sexual Regulation and the Law: A Canadian Perspective by Richard Jochelson and James Gacek, eds","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.010054357618212774,"score_gpt":0.27161959648928163,"score_spread":0.26156523887106886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176523456","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006561104,0.79155916,0.000012208222,0.1989253,0.000025636262,0.0002741912,0.000004499429,0.00000841733,0.0026294584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4760777,0.51475847,0.000010086662,0.007575332,0.00023735437,0.00000586602,0.0000010808552,0.0000066999087,0.0013273929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984396,0.0002964514,0.0001641948,0.00013753252,0.00026211728,0.0007001032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994111,0.000083544015,0.0001374811,0.000039652023,0.00017177546,0.00015645001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012798574,0.0000938291,0.00021712594,0.000012521975,0.0008099039,0.000049417777,0.00011688365,0.000048161997,0.00006441413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004145109,0.00006046021,0.000037923135,0.00012664247,0.00050862244,0.00018936074,0.00002386367,0.00055628957,0.0000019654383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009838285,0.000016385673,0.00035255548,0.00019625007,0.00048225065,0.000001407519,0.117908165,0.0000011074726,0.00017031746,0.7328934,0.13961613,0.008263643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014677098,0.0003543267,0.00058821373,0.00033060802,0.00029359665,0.00002939728,0.16266663,0.000032046133,0.000028872497,0.026344227,0.80754703,0.00031734793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19763704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18433492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70654917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007519658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007275502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8305488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177574401","doi":"10.1017/9781009023146.009","title":"Secret Evidence in Civil Litigation against the Government","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil litigation; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Civil procedure; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05281484509606555,"score_gpt":0.24879439986167431,"score_spread":0.19597955476560877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177574401","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015691522,0.00097370095,0.0000132017085,0.00089277053,0.0002657599,0.00060039456,0.00008218226,0.000058185797,0.9955447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0325361,0.0027966953,0.000018263025,0.00018455881,0.00023247098,0.0000025910563,0.000012320653,0.000015395686,0.9642016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979545,0.00022751701,0.00018572144,0.00042593497,0.00088582165,0.00032054106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881417,0.00037647557,0.00021939955,0.0002943233,0.00018182107,0.00011379755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039851552,0.00025199467,0.0003030715,0.000023462018,0.0008315317,0.000107836975,0.0005624612,0.00029064328,0.00001586957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019183324,0.00022688694,0.00018632383,0.000020076619,0.00069916947,0.00017614909,0.00045588467,0.00048763352,0.000008372967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023149592,0.000007283623,0.00004690214,0.000047888087,0.00009088052,0.00015430905,0.005534225,0.00000657115,0.000030581592,0.9767962,0.015788358,0.0014736514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017736696,0.0000109722305,0.0003316663,0.000620588,0.00007338304,4.1233233e-7,0.0049536997,0.000013793006,0.00004506281,0.0000089526775,0.9934637,0.00030041044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041149617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002554426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9776753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001811459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018364584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9252181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181390979","doi":"","title":"Re-Thinking the Instrumental Rationality Principles of Fundamental Justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Arbitrariness; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Law; Individualism; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.051708447854904076,"score_gpt":0.3210598935051734,"score_spread":0.2693514456502693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181390979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92528415,0.0016024231,0.00027371303,0.061913487,0.0002871815,0.00026928785,0.0000055235455,0.00003662536,0.010327635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99689096,0.0013670347,0.00012035814,0.0005535779,0.00069273356,0.000003226022,0.0000017282675,0.0000057806787,0.00036459058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977216,0.0002720892,0.0002808153,0.00012592912,0.00068040955,0.0009191405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993937,0.00013351168,0.00024093094,0.000051983476,0.0001005077,0.00007935668],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018522617,0.00009661771,0.0001395497,0.000010432016,0.0018604788,0.000087294175,0.00040492424,0.000046240068,0.00009360261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004545406,0.0000630147,0.000113595874,0.00017494847,0.0003372683,0.00025446725,0.00009453056,0.0008983023,0.000012355252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058557427,0.00005047605,0.02056988,0.0000140206785,0.0002478362,0.0000011527862,0.06804665,0.000059559596,0.00036404224,0.90745485,0.0001906966,0.00294227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010296658,0.00032550617,0.017190201,0.000036939833,0.00023958858,0.000015415177,0.86804163,0.00012027798,0.00029350672,0.05509298,0.05728512,0.00032918443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009437882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007574935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85236186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010140784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094942184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183973827","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12542","title":"The <i><scp>AFCC‐Ontario</scp> Parenting Plan Guide</i> and <i>Template</i>: Jurisdictionally‐Specific Resources for Family Justice Professionals and Parents","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Legislation; Jurisdiction; Plan (archaeology); Conciliation; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Political science; Public relations; Law; Nursing; Medicine; Mediation","score_opus":0.057967735171407325,"score_gpt":0.33761456779584664,"score_spread":0.27964683262443935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183973827","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16572654,0.80689704,0.00003480115,0.008536332,0.0014073974,0.001828767,0.000094364324,0.00010876778,0.015366008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03429159,0.93700755,0.0016864737,0.0065698777,0.0009925151,0.00061991496,0.00008104934,0.000046090157,0.018704949],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969216,0.00047977085,0.00067033747,0.00055826735,0.0007617214,0.00060832035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961215,0.0025303604,0.00033451253,0.00022722146,0.00057333603,0.00021307338],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020128149,0.00029267865,0.0005497472,0.000014966719,0.0040925513,0.00032875937,0.00031110618,0.00013991998,0.00001268738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013851085,0.00019830566,0.00015284764,0.0002525042,0.0003930704,0.00019501233,0.00025827502,0.00031089073,0.000017578777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009602256,0.00008419171,0.01681346,0.0017233972,0.00023998758,0.000017282342,0.022507114,0.000001319448,0.00023831203,0.0033654526,0.93976986,0.01523001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002618088,0.0000191534,0.052177705,0.0020267847,0.00021688952,0.000004355157,0.022113418,0.000002658452,0.0000036832782,0.00019444755,0.92286325,0.00011586475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002474319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00787322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13143495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015764264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026441066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184369935","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3680","title":"First Nations, Settler Parliaments, and the Question of Consultation: Reconciling Parliamentary Supremacy and Indigenous Peoples’ Right to Self-Determination","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aotearoa; Law; Entitlement (fair division); Sovereignty; Indigenous; Political science; Legislature; State (computer science); Constitutional right; Democracy; Statutory law; Legislation; Sociology; Constitution; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.014331825370904354,"score_gpt":0.2932255233017246,"score_spread":0.27889369793082025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184369935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93233454,0.007837609,0.00038489685,0.029874906,0.00085591286,0.0011485365,0.000045296223,0.00007157963,0.02744673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889047,0.0064116134,0.004091247,0.00023883105,0.00018914697,0.000020193878,0.0000061151977,0.0000065036465,0.0001316223],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848866,0.00042423815,0.00032365954,0.00016468995,0.00040154933,0.00019719134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982347,0.0009131003,0.00021444829,0.00006599708,0.00045491275,0.00011682497],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010106678,0.00010693926,0.00019315322,0.00003312655,0.00297694,0.00023135143,0.00009642195,0.00006264171,0.00007802486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079460524,0.000077715384,0.000045362238,0.00016800636,0.0002794785,0.00036544123,0.000055015917,0.00015602172,0.000003555522],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014256782,0.00024313825,0.033120513,0.00025118978,0.000429071,0.00004077006,0.6879046,0.00011199355,0.0002608142,0.26613498,0.0005904183,0.010769979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017929807,0.0004571943,0.13747394,0.0026737512,0.0010866205,0.0007834067,0.68341273,0.0008608835,0.00423285,0.06368772,0.085419,0.0019820842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03253255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48437008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45183754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020330673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010357537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99832106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184461220","doi":"","title":"Rethinking the Role of Lawyers for Children: Child Representation in Canadian Family Relationship Cases","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Best interests; Presumption; Economic Justice; Welfare; Family law; Political science; Representation (politics); Law; Psychology; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.027387726465706367,"score_gpt":0.31223329247273174,"score_spread":0.2848455660070254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184461220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9799145,0.0032567175,0.000031845033,0.00692706,0.00014218922,0.00043091012,0.000005201824,0.000012603348,0.0092789605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998467,0.0006283299,0.00005449254,0.00012616024,0.00052031403,0.000010286677,0.0000030674134,0.0000071320374,0.00018319319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979943,0.00022188827,0.00021818123,0.00011796629,0.00024323622,0.0012044492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926895,0.0002680988,0.0001523083,0.000076753575,0.0001629879,0.000070931164],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024005743,0.00007354637,0.00010809769,0.00006984408,0.002021276,0.00004921975,0.00023337698,0.00007601057,0.000006146269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012030435,0.000053547945,0.00007687488,0.00029620194,0.0002851579,0.00019654258,0.000013233367,0.0006575293,0.0000034965908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032326236,0.00001620391,0.4309563,0.0000013417771,0.00009276037,5.217355e-7,0.051797584,0.0000279717,0.000034580815,0.5089369,0.00017146197,0.00793206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005227685,0.00018061885,0.46647727,0.000045330253,0.000047223955,0.000028738243,0.110090375,0.00004085938,0.000077867335,0.41523728,0.0070654196,0.00018622524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6492486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9718004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32255176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014244755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014029054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184642675","doi":"","title":"Access to Assisted Conception: A Call for Legislative Reform in Light of the Modern Family ( Susan Doe v. Attorney General of Canada )","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Law; Telecommunications; Engineering","score_opus":0.05561309867744824,"score_gpt":0.31758578091382206,"score_spread":0.2619726822363738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184642675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9066088,0.0001902567,0.000013149526,0.009267187,0.0013091214,0.00045662525,0.00013269724,0.0000022862234,0.082019836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969134,0.000008794682,0.0002840232,0.0010080343,0.0003180004,0.000009220746,0.0000010104338,0.000008937351,0.0014485824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984145,0.00010640308,0.00051595137,0.00012631546,0.00042258776,0.00041421037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808204,0.00008586023,0.0003996077,0.00013717265,0.00081695314,0.0004783715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005150644,0.00012814977,0.00036915712,0.000064206266,0.000436239,0.000052868396,0.0006715943,0.000112835274,0.000017631977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024915484,0.000086548775,0.0001380286,0.00031206198,0.00046045048,0.0002779598,0.000033216606,0.00028597514,1.8617554e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000423464,0.00016912354,0.13019231,0.00020278938,0.0008824846,0.000147033,0.24587664,0.0013755736,0.08773087,0.33043393,0.1911621,0.011403668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095271855,0.00010285201,0.4436089,0.00016712818,0.000043490647,0.0000029013931,0.009244077,0.000032334516,0.0010361434,0.00076635904,0.5437589,0.00028416974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98304355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99960774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35259682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013557612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041299607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7326373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W318566348","doi":"","title":"\"The Highest Degree of Communion Possible\": Initial Reflections on the Windsor Report 2004","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Faith; Eucharist; Archbishop; Sociology; Law; Theology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1886321861378773,"score_gpt":0.43214272963434847,"score_spread":0.24351054349647117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W318566348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028594296,0.07471669,0.00001479675,0.397621,0.00030569002,0.0016598811,0.000010462961,0.0001736078,0.49690357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9271662,0.06381503,0.00015750778,0.0052855,0.00041984647,0.00012654114,0.0000041370645,0.0000071973764,0.0030179983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974424,0.0011845132,0.00044643343,0.00018404005,0.00041862164,0.0003239655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971684,0.0018156637,0.0003091686,0.00042196843,0.00020375762,0.00008104244],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024974318,0.00014074455,0.00032017293,0.000010599991,0.0019916175,0.000036067064,0.00063733367,0.00009065788,0.0005244548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048675123,0.000059245398,0.00021688893,0.0004146294,0.001663529,0.00007121698,0.0001299614,0.00034589824,0.00008872755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003982351,0.00026218165,0.0010160884,0.000069150636,0.00012277598,0.000019719366,0.0035117338,0.0000029134005,0.000038452818,0.79611284,0.06760674,0.13119762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007050271,0.000113325616,0.00931045,0.00035641866,0.000050779072,0.000008635954,0.0011233152,6.010139e-7,0.00003139617,0.0033652699,0.98545206,0.000117232965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093803165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027289405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9178453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012613098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055998138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185803507","doi":"","title":"Le concept d’autonomie dans l’arrêt Carter c. Canada : Au-delà du libre-choix (The Concept of Autonomy in Carter v Canada: Beyond Free Choice)","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Autonomy; Normative; Personal autonomy; Political science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.008857259914108252,"score_gpt":0.23138877658000362,"score_spread":0.22253151666589538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185803507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6999646,0.022627497,0.00005171316,0.24024473,0.0054524667,0.00084725267,0.00022041578,0.00002056505,0.030570753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743416,0.0006589756,0.000017414344,0.0007390496,0.0022730823,0.000022191283,0.000006292949,0.000039466326,0.021901986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927234,0.0006020912,0.0009828426,0.00050762575,0.0009725891,0.0042114235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970243,0.00043929258,0.0011413593,0.00069280475,0.00032586223,0.00037641072],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001386437,0.00052422285,0.00085760106,0.000036753518,0.004184322,0.00024809662,0.0025804571,0.0002616677,0.00017178894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005119854,0.00042936183,0.00027778812,0.00021131709,0.0023604427,0.00089755794,0.000346141,0.00273925,0.0000045818915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007132294,0.0002783908,0.1618746,0.00005454407,0.0025469037,0.0001313,0.15023015,0.0015790218,0.00012793683,0.5629162,0.08289961,0.03729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041988376,0.0002806981,0.18495536,0.00016432983,0.0003933698,0.00007289048,0.15348479,0.00025144624,0.00027636063,0.012206692,0.64246166,0.0012535766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.559562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023699243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11291622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187241523","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3433234","title":"Reading Beyond the Lines: Oral Understandings and Aboriginal Litigation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Sociology; Gender studies; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.015399270842305919,"score_gpt":0.3044991989559155,"score_spread":0.28909992811360957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3187241523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94178647,0.0022621118,0.0006600764,0.046386927,0.00030112817,0.00032256506,7.450187e-7,0.00005132916,0.008228647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98873377,0.007162945,0.00009062721,0.00021278822,0.00059091003,0.000008646391,7.31009e-7,0.0000076136726,0.0031919756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978844,0.00015612015,0.00016654948,0.00012532125,0.0003427422,0.0013248599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946374,0.00012522066,0.00011859459,0.000049436185,0.00015275733,0.000090274276],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016048135,0.00010525598,0.000117107425,0.000027561102,0.002156737,0.00033807475,0.00017844298,0.00006389399,0.000059460683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000140743,0.00006412295,0.000052163614,0.00017926445,0.00039448388,0.00056103006,0.000019103509,0.00086151215,0.000029113759],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071608592,0.00001144109,0.007350417,0.0000027937472,0.00009526002,5.95445e-7,0.023228643,0.0000020010903,0.00019707013,0.9580637,0.0011137292,0.009927144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041915433,0.000113472444,0.0059581543,0.000021689726,0.000052079693,0.00003987306,0.22374147,0.000050382194,0.000023476561,0.73485607,0.03450364,0.000220508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006624626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064492426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22320765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012952698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005520914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189177118","doi":"","title":"L’acte de juger à l’âge séculier : le cas d’April dans AC c Manitoba (Judging at the Age of Secularism: The Case of April in AC v Manitoba)","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Political science; Secularism; Supreme court; Art; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03235136236783248,"score_gpt":0.26892949411132466,"score_spread":0.23657813174349218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189177118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9313771,0.023721628,0.00025263446,0.041160908,0.00042244454,0.00048048518,0.000019604135,0.000017564791,0.0025476408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855239,0.011505469,0.000052886415,0.0005418847,0.00085093983,0.0000140132815,0.0000028607144,0.000039043425,0.0014690023],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938484,0.0013735094,0.000818625,0.00037719667,0.0006969723,0.0028852886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828285,0.0003933567,0.00066588697,0.0002753095,0.00020870316,0.00017391873],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036486173,0.00039548433,0.0006338925,0.000045941026,0.0019847394,0.00010594257,0.00094237406,0.00027782534,0.0000678418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043370906,0.00025584234,0.0004911573,0.00079698133,0.0015041393,0.0003614665,0.00040544115,0.0032190597,0.000030765164],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043569627,0.0006999447,0.05737901,0.00034586046,0.003467873,0.0036687385,0.52806115,0.00169868,0.025579616,0.33439675,0.002184878,0.042081825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002213527,0.0004830559,0.02016303,0.00025988623,0.0007822523,0.0027448805,0.90575,0.000624455,0.0034682371,0.029213438,0.03343139,0.0008658827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08290587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61500686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.532101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044405293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016420159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191849360","doi":"10.29173/mlj1063","title":"Apology Legislation: Should it be Safe to Apologize in Manitoba? An Assessment of Bill 202","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Political science; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.12224495057116484,"score_gpt":0.41204143584445063,"score_spread":0.2897964852732858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191849360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7740299,0.00016896463,0.0001909149,0.11869146,0.0012638642,0.0006464843,0.000011527879,0.000059117643,0.10493775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99220455,0.00015824089,0.0034400187,0.0031070092,0.0009735554,0.000008969746,0.0000029094276,0.000008615694,0.00009616285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973094,0.00054998184,0.00058013806,0.00026655738,0.00071440346,0.00057955243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989182,0.00014833179,0.00025273935,0.00016405391,0.00026772806,0.00024894587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00131473,0.0001963874,0.00040299725,0.00010584323,0.0011087762,0.00014446114,0.0005036321,0.00019236501,0.0003495197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019707874,0.00014388323,0.00011562947,0.00034862035,0.00035688543,0.00050109887,0.00007643045,0.0005156046,0.000017927845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033466824,0.0023924024,0.23951484,0.000033712415,0.00036661778,0.0005559786,0.08814425,0.0037994143,0.003630185,0.47114104,0.042663857,0.14742304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012750815,0.00110857,0.5464706,0.0000817548,0.0000614332,0.00004051826,0.24586736,0.00007729148,0.00013576694,0.014594553,0.18966363,0.00062346645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13715804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7907744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65361637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007779989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009009626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86858773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191956399","doi":"10.22215/etd/2021-14515","title":"Judicial Treaty Federalism and the Reconciliation of Ontario's Duty to Consult","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Treaty; Law; Political science; Parliamentary sovereignty; Sovereignty; Constitution; Judicial review; Supreme court; Dual federalism; Jurisprudence; Duty; Politics","score_opus":0.027718623384907222,"score_gpt":0.3179746946938719,"score_spread":0.2902560713089647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191956399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7521201,0.0004621188,0.0000011296322,0.0050057834,0.0007850842,0.00071498216,0.000011583309,0.000026446744,0.24087277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7282817,0.00048264948,0.00027006952,0.00043633516,0.0003136408,0.00009193546,0.00017347188,0.000010695358,0.2699395],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866414,0.00020560497,0.00029707755,0.0002429083,0.00041040443,0.00017987948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998857,0.00029069989,0.00018924354,0.00008796198,0.00050739327,0.000067697125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045222556,0.00015347401,0.0004130747,0.000020579286,0.0008912931,0.000110333436,0.00011946735,0.00021842921,0.00065683085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009264051,0.00009649736,0.00011164573,0.00014379442,0.00021979591,0.00007734102,0.00002625088,0.00016971142,0.000007806212],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002878015,0.00003430007,0.0027168316,0.000042663505,0.00024005094,0.0000018538511,0.9412293,0.0000011800714,0.00007110548,0.03675243,0.008461374,0.010161123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030241979,0.0000811107,0.2810199,0.0002749419,0.0004849608,6.11019e-7,0.4727705,0.0000038083485,0.00082827307,0.0026691756,0.23806268,0.0007798263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8602084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98832804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46845877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048187093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056608877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71918374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192204141","doi":"","title":"Spousal Support in Quebec: Resisting the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Antipathy; Jurisdiction; Family law; Legislature; Political science; Law; Autonomy; Child support; Advisory committee; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.036323941955585734,"score_gpt":0.346887269518408,"score_spread":0.31056332756282223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192204141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8955176,0.002509716,0.00023578286,0.04936391,0.0016804253,0.0006224491,0.000005720556,0.00018005347,0.049884345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9543185,0.0024656067,0.00016655326,0.0006932777,0.0040773293,0.000011521468,0.0000028286147,0.00002671206,0.03823765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943995,0.00044715867,0.0007033514,0.00031882312,0.00084174646,0.0032894171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858445,0.00020356214,0.00032037686,0.0001858576,0.0005650616,0.00014067064],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075520547,0.00024580784,0.00031286737,0.00008686512,0.0025056067,0.0002109182,0.0007851002,0.00015605122,0.00041315512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017884133,0.00016388088,0.00017609261,0.00043975865,0.0008062543,0.00047013443,0.00012385122,0.0016867114,0.00018432587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000551243,0.000356271,0.11492392,0.000026698846,0.0007168015,0.0001577179,0.12600543,0.000038685812,0.00092163746,0.45088223,0.08002015,0.22539923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015199006,0.00070957834,0.037101343,0.00008056213,0.00009556896,0.0001827789,0.26291457,0.00003940819,0.000078689874,0.043356963,0.6530492,0.0008714566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07825797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74222296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66396505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023131622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043240166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194864473","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Reintegrative Shaming: A Comparison of Indigenous Legal Traditions of Canada and Braithwaite's Theory of Reintegrative Shaming","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Criminology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02603062122942319,"score_gpt":0.2608237617613418,"score_spread":0.23479314053191863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194864473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9806927,0.0010345854,0.00013056293,0.00038491192,0.00012427026,0.00037054345,0.00041990812,0.000026504282,0.016816022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966855,0.00013019702,0.0007255256,0.000026546804,0.000023571167,0.0000017749231,0.000030541825,0.000012694996,0.0023636643],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971891,0.0010099098,0.00043554773,0.0003480686,0.0005888757,0.00042849968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973688,0.0008205854,0.0004950736,0.0002622919,0.0008496646,0.00020358719],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053155323,0.00024249943,0.00071642164,0.00021948108,0.0014363684,0.000045701898,0.0004684995,0.00016307084,0.000073667485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006049672,0.00024061625,0.00016303989,0.0012212818,0.0013019785,0.00058588217,0.00015429863,0.0006184393,3.8774812e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025336695,0.00063649844,0.098990984,0.00013308116,0.001195228,0.0002344538,0.69063985,0.000069373826,0.004875109,0.19843894,0.0006577119,0.003875366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013264096,0.00035684797,0.083448015,0.00048020255,0.00040571127,0.000009318718,0.8428196,0.000018147455,0.029008545,0.0017097708,0.03971978,0.0006977069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37422243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.891793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51757056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061340776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020357338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195226208","doi":"","title":"Recent Developments in Canadian Criminal Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Mens rea; Law; Reactionary; Criminal law; Supreme court; Political science; Presumption; Presumption of innocence; Excuse; Government (linguistics); Criminology; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02403580796479337,"score_gpt":0.29930517296647025,"score_spread":0.27526936500167687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195226208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79133475,0.0059668273,0.000037436508,0.068011306,0.0009831231,0.00038947217,0.000004349658,0.000054649885,0.13321806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761008,0.019817386,0.00005141187,0.00029316175,0.00022319377,0.000006094019,3.8205397e-7,0.000007667299,0.0034998872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958885,0.00016519449,0.00020458094,0.00014565422,0.00033884565,0.0032572458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994289,0.00004932719,0.000065582426,0.00004971166,0.00012262874,0.00028383042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019807294,0.00010524401,0.00012651896,0.000066780005,0.00096261274,0.000054161585,0.00027353247,0.00007937461,0.00014698332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027980507,0.000068504414,0.000042242886,0.00017949558,0.000172102,0.00026180412,0.000022356955,0.000567362,0.00011541534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014026073,0.000021362905,0.01926925,0.0000010657104,0.000054561053,0.0000115149505,0.008449212,3.6169882e-7,0.00005315296,0.80523294,0.00025660294,0.16663595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061292987,0.000049393588,0.02033439,0.000043329,0.000012728822,0.000020277626,0.018240767,1.9837796e-7,0.00003203978,0.037406325,0.9230023,0.00024532998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58444256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99546796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9227457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011718227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058659283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W31961054","doi":"10.1002/jbm.b.34550","title":"Do pregnant women have (living) will?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Living Wills; Legislation; Silence; Law; Health care; Political science","score_opus":0.03250250891501294,"score_gpt":0.27355156146576404,"score_spread":0.2410490525507511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W31961054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7692669,0.0019050133,0.000007892143,0.017780097,0.0005460988,0.0015224122,0.0000072020644,0.00033969354,0.2086247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96506137,0.00029201992,0.00009705604,0.00030274127,0.0008103435,0.0016272255,3.6562162e-7,0.000008777629,0.0318001],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982546,0.00011981858,0.00015743688,0.00022894639,0.00042696038,0.0008122127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934477,0.00015322717,0.000069318645,0.00011955833,0.00007325842,0.00023984365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007324029,0.00011302294,0.00016255768,0.00002315349,0.0006710652,0.00013587548,0.00025005144,0.00007992019,0.0002636931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008049922,0.0000829605,0.000062862455,0.00012888573,0.00026644437,0.000402535,0.00010142881,0.00010951596,0.000086788525],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000797755,0.00012789975,0.030642027,0.000011299693,0.00008832869,0.0000032526746,0.20779157,0.000011018764,0.0000050184767,0.004222458,0.009706414,0.74738276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011910659,0.000005291709,0.3090645,0.000011213058,0.0000073971146,2.1971404e-7,0.013237533,0.000002939437,0.000013917111,0.00019564014,0.6771762,0.00016606173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010725836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019939758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7472167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007270545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000222926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5161359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196835571","doi":"10.1093/he/9780191926440.003.0017","title":"Entick v Carrington [1765] 95 ER 807, King’s Bench","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Principle of legality; Law; Government (linguistics); History; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.038136527449773576,"score_gpt":0.2498627030724112,"score_spread":0.21172617562263762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196835571","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007234493,0.0005595816,0.00001327177,0.00022191081,0.0007227437,0.0004975294,0.00007578771,0.0001991041,0.9969866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0044355094,0.0020862124,0.00019821468,0.0000795472,0.0004419902,0.0000015120177,0.000031589934,0.000037669626,0.99268776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976435,0.00011276626,0.00022325381,0.00065769965,0.000783909,0.00057892496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985975,0.000121574,0.00027115276,0.00036804652,0.00037895524,0.00026276914],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001905249,0.00043047668,0.0005550613,0.00006690701,0.0015661094,0.0001612155,0.0007171841,0.00063984276,0.0004347636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053534965,0.0004695738,0.0004249995,0.000020207419,0.0007414473,0.00017693966,0.00073873805,0.00061461324,0.000006983389],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002432191,0.000014839869,0.000068559806,0.000069203896,0.0003876558,0.00020275901,0.011594455,0.0000031660256,0.000017038778,0.9775567,0.0064647635,0.003596511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002970119,0.000021290392,0.000071656534,0.00016564692,0.00027882282,9.531571e-7,0.002530267,0.0000028167015,0.000038941125,0.00029488263,0.99574524,0.0005524625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007612113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004604665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98928046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000835166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001982127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197605928","doi":"","title":"A Right Without a Rights-Holder Is Hollow: Introduction to OHLJ’s Special Issue on Identifying Rights-Bearing Aboriginal Peoples","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Constitution; Human rights; Context (archaeology); Positivism; Political science; Sociology; Indigenous; Section (typography); Dilemma; Philosophy; History; Epistemology","score_opus":0.022592379463507763,"score_gpt":0.3313863645421783,"score_spread":0.3087939850786705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197605928","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13133058,0.00049994944,0.00025155948,0.048050843,0.010606855,0.0006336236,0.000024527648,0.00022001726,0.80838203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89512795,0.00028316132,0.0042043775,0.00082647044,0.07758545,0.000024117655,0.000008701616,0.00003783419,0.021901933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957778,0.00044489253,0.00057475094,0.0007021016,0.0015788373,0.0009216232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809843,0.00011853122,0.00028053467,0.00029090547,0.00067698694,0.000534617],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009052268,0.0003820451,0.00053591793,0.000109514294,0.0067985966,0.0012932873,0.00047210738,0.00020759844,0.007919213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018288118,0.00029812168,0.00031979638,0.00053700927,0.00031387364,0.00092512177,0.00010596286,0.00086692476,0.0013883971],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023018662,0.0004924538,0.0023831062,0.00005359916,0.0005760208,0.0007183481,0.100204624,0.00012391861,0.0022300377,0.7190546,0.17219459,0.0017385646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000723866,0.00007865746,0.0017359041,0.00019184881,0.00011280992,0.00010130708,0.0046548145,0.0000054440834,0.004336566,0.0150712775,0.9724716,0.00051589543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060403574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.524279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.800277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007088461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018614125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198273099","doi":"","title":"The Conscientious Objection of Medical Practitioners to the CPSO's 'Effective Referral' Requirement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Conscientious objector; Subject (documents); Referral; Political science; Conscience; Politics; Law; Sociology; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.026068323574175933,"score_gpt":0.3416659872455638,"score_spread":0.31559766367138786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198273099","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14032866,0.00393845,0.003939077,0.83841807,0.0015429156,0.0014250998,0.0000034539141,0.00007572541,0.010328536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99278605,0.004960025,0.000013481427,0.00085605966,0.0007523293,0.000029692766,6.150123e-7,0.0000061377473,0.0005956125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964098,0.00063841656,0.00026330067,0.0001567793,0.0014285536,0.0011031737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989356,0.0003302682,0.00022177072,0.00007921741,0.0002597853,0.00017335276],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059434525,0.00009429288,0.00013251303,0.000018093115,0.0027365896,0.00011987983,0.0005108507,0.00006952104,0.00006983761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030089077,0.000048845428,0.000115304145,0.00041685137,0.00042316393,0.00017705832,0.00008373044,0.0011678041,0.000036584875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003183405,0.0001311449,0.0010109255,0.000011694586,0.0009545925,0.0000053616277,0.10461731,0.00020039071,0.0008993893,0.7548262,0.032451596,0.10457309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083161064,0.0008365421,0.0020498296,0.000044740802,0.00010512681,0.000034787205,0.29705688,0.00007661395,0.00016540127,0.021101706,0.677453,0.00024380581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025026435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03728166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8524574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012924017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013902014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99856174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199050573","doi":"","title":"GENDER DISCRIMINATION FORBIDDEN: FROM THE GLENS OF ANGUS TO A CHURCH NEAR YOU","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Charter; Context (archaeology); Law; Relation (database); Labour law; Sexual orientation; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.08696858760603318,"score_gpt":0.34978628546165436,"score_spread":0.26281769785562115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199050573","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1431216,0.24937354,0.00003716038,0.48072645,0.0007265386,0.004233226,0.00018001096,0.000057364363,0.12154411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98041344,0.009307862,0.00017562309,0.008647154,0.00031177845,0.000025930838,0.000008911768,0.000010098363,0.0010991979],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987971,0.00019422192,0.00020171354,0.00012931185,0.00033370106,0.000343928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916345,0.00018576343,0.00007278591,0.00022228804,0.00013717116,0.00021855866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015202546,0.00009061647,0.00018443698,0.000011443856,0.0011140052,0.000046235415,0.00043698068,0.000044684646,0.0005075483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007618995,0.000047510377,0.00009278992,0.000301239,0.00027509982,0.00005897199,0.000036835685,0.00010959994,0.0001562628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010303771,0.000028336464,0.0063932044,0.00041456637,0.00022108018,0.00001490838,0.35017416,0.0000034296202,0.00006549763,0.08835805,0.2924654,0.26185107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003748087,0.000007636642,0.08493044,0.00025601397,0.00007029334,2.7610236e-7,0.0049719815,8.49916e-7,0.000005468464,0.00024765913,0.9093847,0.00008718085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7814613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9385106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83729184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039591326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023044425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.856814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199198463","doi":"","title":"\"A Delicate Necessity\": 'Bruker v. Marcovitz' and the Problem of Jewish Divorce","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RUNE (Research UNE)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Judaism; Wife; Law; Supreme court; Multiculturalism; Sociology; Political science; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11108367263083446,"score_gpt":0.38662980825360693,"score_spread":0.27554613562277247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199198463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8289378,0.005677688,0.000028519476,0.08462143,0.000068712645,0.0015369506,0.00001039907,0.0000926406,0.07902585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866283,0.004045513,0.00040671325,0.00011536455,0.00015577632,0.00007529386,0.0000016830732,0.000010647653,0.008560695],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965719,0.00097086496,0.00025316802,0.00028672646,0.0012563168,0.0006610152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978753,0.0011268444,0.00008493403,0.00020294917,0.0005453557,0.00016461762],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029430776,0.0001225192,0.00028217924,0.000053244865,0.0026695626,0.00007058056,0.0005274585,0.00009428149,0.00008595759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006697645,0.00007392575,0.00008638534,0.00082112406,0.0058064284,0.00024430774,0.00043898355,0.0004177925,0.00005442709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005240948,0.0004811759,0.12830006,0.00029274946,0.00047830507,0.0000724608,0.41281733,0.000027471948,0.0026524584,0.30159277,0.09361229,0.059148844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004632768,0.00019993579,0.33084387,0.00016474671,0.00005843814,0.000010882259,0.03156616,0.00018683211,0.0009138379,0.037112735,0.59363484,0.0006749221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06363472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006147326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5000226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107037566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014594807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99862885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199360233","doi":"","title":"Faire Basculer Le Climat De Profilage Social À Ottawa : Le Programme De Contestation Des Contraventions (The Ottawa Ticket Defence Program: Using Legal Advocacy to Challenge the Social Profiling of Street-Involved People )","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ticket; Art","score_opus":0.03951730474143296,"score_gpt":0.3258653075712138,"score_spread":0.28634800282978085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199360233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9157302,0.0050963317,0.011536026,0.064332895,0.00027236834,0.0023511737,0.000024124538,0.00009224259,0.00056463585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944209,0.0007700117,0.0019764327,0.000071359565,0.0011949925,0.00026060434,0.0000045654897,0.000051486502,0.0012496498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914693,0.0018391631,0.0008483894,0.00041456622,0.00085113564,0.004577396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760216,0.00039590368,0.0007920506,0.00015420998,0.0008247746,0.00023086825],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006599614,0.00041489117,0.00053364644,0.00005940999,0.007862428,0.00029446676,0.0007701073,0.00027658878,0.000021931823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092165644,0.00025821791,0.0005833154,0.00069219375,0.0020491704,0.00081665575,0.00013444098,0.0013511573,0.000008014558],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011207272,0.0010079483,0.017443288,0.00013546673,0.0008047323,0.0000056458302,0.095794596,0.000040396637,0.0030375607,0.7397558,0.00018021495,0.14168225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039696563,0.001238817,0.028541904,0.0005149755,0.00074834615,0.00005758762,0.84885395,0.0006440438,0.0011714788,0.10471609,0.0084786685,0.0010644753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015758064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2370958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7530594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003988962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009334667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199977730","doi":"10.29173/mlj1156","title":"Robson JA: The Manitoba Court of Appeal in the Robson Era","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.05152063232510616,"score_gpt":0.29100070515820375,"score_spread":0.23948007283309758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199977730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.828058,0.001365107,0.000039024217,0.13205911,0.00075773644,0.0006390057,0.000008640985,0.000044423075,0.03702896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954903,0.00033515657,0.00013079506,0.0022049937,0.0017959405,0.000010549703,9.888872e-7,0.000011070689,0.000020169782],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725884,0.00074358424,0.00041781168,0.0001738771,0.0009471478,0.00045871854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989964,0.00031683495,0.00026232886,0.00013822681,0.00016571843,0.00012048728],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014499264,0.0001707887,0.00026787037,0.000017678298,0.0021065276,0.00029949532,0.001007353,0.00009413409,0.000083732484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003009024,0.000089620844,0.00017621784,0.0003302963,0.0005697906,0.00028197447,0.00011339901,0.0008636673,0.000049523227],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033363435,0.0006128935,0.07902857,0.00012636247,0.00054500333,0.00043038317,0.5725785,0.0009112754,0.0008216029,0.20145713,0.07309555,0.070059076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006499832,0.0001370824,0.059462234,0.00005929559,0.00006649939,0.000025396399,0.688217,0.00007936563,0.000074294854,0.0017979187,0.24919179,0.00023915041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.071775734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5051787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43340293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021438958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051626783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200317807","doi":"","title":"Caring Society v Canada: Neoliberalism, Social Reproduction, and Indigenous Child Welfare","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Neoliberalism (international relations); Welfare; Reproduction; Social reproduction; Political science; Politics; Social Welfare; Tribunal; Social work; Government (linguistics); Economic growth; Sociology; Political economy; Public administration; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.012769026574899024,"score_gpt":0.26648434185182324,"score_spread":0.2537153152769242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200317807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8737335,0.004745837,0.00001258501,0.11478115,0.000736495,0.00022398411,0.000004675299,0.000047325146,0.005714448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98961025,0.0052265073,0.00002033662,0.00016911008,0.002480668,0.000004920942,0.000001325334,0.000014291717,0.002472607],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969353,0.000097714066,0.00020487078,0.00028421739,0.0005000753,0.0019778393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921507,0.000013747314,0.00030826396,0.00015717969,0.00018923784,0.00011650478],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014169607,0.0001549274,0.00021584508,0.0000133578615,0.02518238,0.00036141294,0.00041386226,0.00010924673,0.000014658074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022954104,0.0001354659,0.00011597244,0.000060342696,0.00039306245,0.00041274264,0.0001125827,0.0014181894,0.0000013390478],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061873565,0.00010591226,0.09107817,0.00004278189,0.0019913125,0.000026736023,0.41464594,0.000023378838,0.000052785537,0.37842384,0.006914987,0.1066323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012595596,0.000088633074,0.33976814,0.000034020184,0.00017158354,0.00023022151,0.2380481,0.0000046469254,0.000033474316,0.02311332,0.39639676,0.00085152127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86684424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9726116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38948178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032158892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021418137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9760867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202365505","doi":"","title":"The Legal within Folktales: Embedded Law in Indigenous and French Canadian Oral Stories","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fulbright Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Folklore; Archetype; Object (grammar); Oral tradition; Storytelling; Law; Legal fiction; History; Oral literature; Sociology; Literature; Political science; Anthropology; Narrative; Linguistics; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01167611359239885,"score_gpt":0.27894658232502234,"score_spread":0.2672704687326235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202365505","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96560174,0.018842883,0.000009322326,0.00835168,0.0005220009,0.00017742324,0.0000036898962,0.000020428115,0.006470848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906055,0.0045214063,0.000043274726,0.00016863277,0.00028002594,0.000007113096,0.0000014551614,0.00000914654,0.004363485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671,0.00034365378,0.00023095142,0.00017111193,0.0003529268,0.0021913827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935806,0.00011150802,0.00009069564,0.00008236578,0.0001617868,0.000195578],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020373273,0.00012936264,0.00017694407,0.000032668406,0.0036783237,0.0004030658,0.0002448784,0.00010011175,0.000014421753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033310743,0.00009138844,0.00005629115,0.00028394003,0.00047279792,0.0003061241,0.0000389874,0.0013636558,0.0000060311695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011648237,0.000028977072,0.016986849,0.0000035443336,0.000193782,0.00008540315,0.20172009,0.00001565077,0.000031156655,0.7716308,0.00021709493,0.00907499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010211746,0.00018780661,0.01820607,0.00004485761,0.000057626206,0.00027148,0.5844289,0.000009561233,0.000056681296,0.15903822,0.2361176,0.000560002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7804485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99904704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6125926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029790201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007249126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203621158","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12540","title":"Identifying Coercive Control in Canadian Family Law: A Required Analysis in Determining the Best Interests of the Child","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Control (management); Psychology; Family law; Best interests; Psychological intervention; Political science; Law; Criminology; Social psychology; Computer science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.05914237393214094,"score_gpt":0.35307707261047466,"score_spread":0.2939346986783337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203621158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5865469,0.33178368,0.000010236048,0.03475698,0.0006766437,0.0023863027,0.00008713755,0.000026201145,0.043725908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96451926,0.028658228,0.000020270747,0.006585366,0.000044606833,0.000055078664,0.000004416988,0.0000072356106,0.000105553285],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972542,0.0010171835,0.00056304934,0.00027117005,0.0004302126,0.00046419792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987919,0.0003281976,0.00021732508,0.00030370924,0.00025437784,0.00010452075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015503659,0.00015770232,0.0006575034,0.000064477055,0.0005496317,0.00007735648,0.0005617835,0.00008359501,0.000020559053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012065981,0.000096236494,0.00031459267,0.0017075769,0.00034189233,0.00015473073,0.0001102859,0.00031076933,0.000014161831],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011325568,0.00019176904,0.9137537,0.0009988928,0.0011463164,0.000114400274,0.053200617,0.00008400616,0.00022480237,0.006886317,0.0037725517,0.019615337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042265377,0.000009758757,0.90382063,0.0056148604,0.0006558151,5.2451765e-7,0.016637854,0.000066560046,0.0000042840998,0.00006210505,0.07247329,0.0002316707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67912984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9766843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37797236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005348527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031617703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42273784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208071220","doi":"10.4324/9781315604954-19","title":"From Implicitly Christian to Neoliberal: The Moral Foundations of Canadian Law Exposed by the Case of Prostitution","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Law; Political science; Criminology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.05264705387871729,"score_gpt":0.29969582069050904,"score_spread":0.24704876681179175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208071220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051146224,0.000247076,0.000022962764,0.028324302,0.00031880673,0.0014139223,0.0013775984,0.00003257185,0.9631481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77121854,0.000065647524,0.00011912705,0.0008404799,0.00042534765,0.00004634894,0.000040756502,0.000017941433,0.22722584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988406,0.00006679656,0.00032604721,0.00022490932,0.00026674953,0.00027492607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987929,0.0002481323,0.0002096628,0.00028276825,0.00029393946,0.00017261066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023442961,0.00019206108,0.00026943983,0.00005017323,0.0012513723,0.000060345752,0.00037896028,0.00018659447,0.0008430692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009372259,0.000091890375,0.00013177961,0.000089816116,0.0012867021,0.00010421567,0.0000717022,0.00014345685,0.000055732904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004498072,0.0000042636634,0.000007670235,0.0000034885584,0.00008354171,0.000006785311,0.01961382,6.743786e-7,0.00010949485,0.9494894,0.029145133,0.001531206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016533148,0.000038651095,0.00009994563,0.00007810293,0.000105642685,0.0000035314995,0.006789057,0.0000014273153,0.00013357347,0.027783267,0.96453947,0.0002619892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9881973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9837088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93539435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032182544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027296352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.962467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209542695","doi":"10.14288/bcs.vi211.196250","title":"Who are the “Aboriginal Peoples of Canada”? Case Comment on R. v. Desautel, 2021 SCC 17","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Publishing; Political science; Law; Media studies; Library science; History; Genealogy; Sociology","score_opus":0.03235341945398313,"score_gpt":0.3282163222785328,"score_spread":0.2958629028245497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209542695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033478644,0.00047379127,0.000012670397,0.15247698,0.0009957514,0.0011154525,0.00027292856,0.00001984629,0.81115395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4122222,0.0006957173,0.0002754584,0.0023797175,0.00031586434,0.00021821746,0.0000065608506,0.0000117381405,0.5838745],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880195,0.00028674034,0.00015937546,0.00017825175,0.00033295623,0.0002407419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987892,0.00049310556,0.000099847086,0.00017032042,0.00035877974,0.00008876058],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025441806,0.000092853326,0.00019650579,0.000009738712,0.01118207,0.0005076095,0.00026549483,0.00003870975,0.0015358409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039067434,0.00006714209,0.00005359103,0.0009262668,0.00017368897,0.00009626452,0.00011485365,0.00013677373,0.0000025802126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007524896,0.000072274044,0.000529549,0.00000391902,0.00006839225,0.000105566105,0.006794663,0.00007257926,0.0000029487048,0.0019896075,0.99024814,0.00010483439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018796105,0.000020772986,0.0016547008,0.000047402416,0.00003033512,0.000014405797,0.12407059,0.000009698392,0.00013310193,0.00007842567,0.8736534,0.00009920255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97775805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99853563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37874356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006180302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019257844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210450248","doi":"","title":"Le droit constitutionnel comme vecteur de transformation sociale. Le cas de la conjugalité au Canada (Constitutional Law as a Vector of Social Change. The Case of Conjugality in Canada)","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01907583138281838,"score_gpt":0.2742780483338952,"score_spread":0.2552022169510768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210450248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9531552,0.0030855443,0.00015174392,0.028733503,0.0006187852,0.0005090218,0.00023706276,0.0000059109125,0.013503194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99843,0.00058310403,0.0000065305644,0.00042044124,0.00038292856,0.000017694108,0.000008065082,0.000008819629,0.00014241663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99544865,0.0013656355,0.00065403426,0.00017487598,0.0005701482,0.0017866648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840933,0.00054422807,0.0005026277,0.00008633162,0.00032381507,0.00013368884],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034461478,0.00022155895,0.00048847555,0.000030962867,0.0016387063,0.000036292033,0.00033077356,0.00020176392,0.000052860847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021984824,0.00020787885,0.00016826134,0.00033450607,0.003254687,0.00040115364,0.000034127926,0.0015091933,0.0000016123561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057379835,0.000087346016,0.007908288,0.00006769889,0.00025141414,0.00005434432,0.022780944,0.000116247786,0.00008367479,0.9678437,0.000066736786,0.0006822332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008080057,0.00032523513,0.07881557,0.00040056737,0.00048282425,0.0061527183,0.630839,0.0004949707,0.0009785289,0.23068939,0.041460413,0.001280717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7371543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022752335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17927352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210542444","doi":"10.1017/9781108914642.019","title":"Entanglement of State and Indigenous Legal Orders in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Political science; Politics; Indigenous; Political philosophy; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Legal realism; Law; Philosophy of law; Legal research; Sociology; Comparative law; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.019209389389319174,"score_gpt":0.21546905457477042,"score_spread":0.19625966518545124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210542444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05040586,0.00053213676,0.0000018851656,0.00007434245,0.00016085235,0.00044665753,0.00024691422,0.000011295079,0.94812006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06356324,0.00094252056,0.000024481977,0.000038170583,0.000029036277,6.1132096e-7,0.000013394259,0.00001145716,0.93537706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875283,0.00007161286,0.00017973769,0.00028466483,0.0004158943,0.00029528118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993378,0.00007212645,0.00018113558,0.00012375056,0.00016115804,0.00012401491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000104224506,0.00019421829,0.00036843898,0.00005285123,0.00029949506,0.000024053212,0.00022394254,0.00010815765,0.000012629521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016293177,0.00022130042,0.000062531224,0.000012840365,0.00035132206,0.00006359792,0.0002591247,0.0002383157,4.683401e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000821884,0.000022617038,0.0010031727,0.00024772505,0.00052728056,0.0015935507,0.02166498,0.000012992261,0.000030083931,0.95863056,0.011051073,0.005133756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037369953,0.000015700858,0.0005908798,0.00011169401,0.000060266935,8.0428833e-7,0.009104496,0.000001163783,0.00006330761,0.0000020739822,0.989403,0.00027287588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98515725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95849025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97835195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018680762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014583444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9024369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210646896","doi":"","title":"The Gladue Analysis: Shedding Light on Appropriate Procedures and Sanctions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Indigenous; Political science; Law; Best practice; Supreme court; Perspective (graphical); Work (physics); Criminal code; Sociology; Criminology; Public relations; Criminal law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.009384902660138831,"score_gpt":0.2847708737486343,"score_spread":0.2753859710884955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210646896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8351358,0.04527881,0.000737999,0.09334411,0.00075954676,0.00038252684,0.0000025601619,0.00012903134,0.024229586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695011,0.024693133,0.000034485667,0.00010002014,0.0005037261,0.000010707882,6.8619687e-7,0.0000065490935,0.005149619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976692,0.0002441618,0.00018380138,0.0001892825,0.0003807666,0.0013327805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993797,0.00014849231,0.00011496702,0.000086455744,0.00018487158,0.00008551766],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013985871,0.00010967348,0.00016277003,0.00004198937,0.0044934712,0.00032712118,0.000169175,0.00006110496,0.000020159481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007169826,0.000066475804,0.000149178,0.00061874196,0.00014560696,0.0001476053,0.00004073523,0.000937029,0.000009820843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052107604,0.000101738435,0.011289784,0.000008145855,0.003961814,0.000009621484,0.021736868,0.00013627409,0.00043550332,0.93409014,0.000739109,0.027438879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011933239,0.00030511,0.039188787,0.00009035642,0.0018832859,0.000121605764,0.45496935,0.0001448913,0.00042558572,0.32478377,0.17604093,0.0008530057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039782852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06982872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6093064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073414174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001085523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99680257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211341363","doi":"10.29173/mlj1120","title":"Importing a Canadian Creation: A Comparative Analysis of Evidentiary Rules Governing the Admissibility of Confessions to ‘Mr. Big’","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Urmia University of Medical Sciences","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.06960964652140636,"score_gpt":0.36434134299574683,"score_spread":0.2947316964743405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211341363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761376,0.00022898887,0.000018955343,0.0020215814,0.00021108982,0.0002544902,0.00004196114,0.0000067710457,0.021078594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994433,0.000020412122,0.00015238734,0.00012616323,0.00014320204,0.0000038008316,0.000003529729,0.000002854726,0.00010437954],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981696,0.0003928606,0.000490874,0.0001366157,0.00054279045,0.0002672588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824864,0.00035873376,0.0005203716,0.00013597151,0.00048262934,0.00025363124],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013514495,0.000096783486,0.00038381576,0.00008210891,0.0014821715,0.000098126744,0.0003093711,0.000051633793,0.0005410095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046164752,0.000062255334,0.00022436651,0.0005486899,0.00025625728,0.00017149132,0.000065055705,0.00020924878,0.00002179894],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003135587,0.000053481584,0.87951136,0.000019504334,0.0014853779,0.0000058463042,0.103873104,0.000610483,0.0005644649,0.010704743,0.00061220047,0.0025281115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013680907,0.00003441194,0.65182054,0.00009183244,0.00044975587,0.0000013492446,0.33696654,0.00019888469,0.00009619413,0.00012343112,0.009964488,0.00011573846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86169136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9876429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23309344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038559275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023806018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211707403","doi":"10.4324/9781351002387-8","title":"Indigenous feminist legal theory","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Feminist legal theory; Feminist theory; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Feminism; Ecology","score_opus":0.029037627182332604,"score_gpt":0.29346869530988723,"score_spread":0.2644310681275546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211707403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009484225,0.0016822085,0.00000586311,0.00056429626,0.00091773353,0.00067519955,0.000032143125,0.00020945423,0.99581826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008746774,0.00088915124,0.000092076494,0.0006638347,0.0009073958,0.00000784694,0.000014051382,0.000040162355,0.9886387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811393,0.00006726921,0.0002693898,0.00039990488,0.00068021053,0.00046927689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899876,0.00029907026,0.00018939904,0.00024232363,0.00013293527,0.00013753511],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055978535,0.0003334138,0.00045781842,0.000042634438,0.0011254856,0.00017611413,0.0004845473,0.0005658592,0.006122985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009953756,0.00025354998,0.00026639682,0.00002622531,0.0007424514,0.00011309349,0.00016500404,0.00045262443,0.004682541],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007952217,0.000007980813,0.000044973833,0.000014050497,0.00012047583,0.000012305958,0.019764865,1.534314e-7,0.0000011047762,0.9597246,0.015173504,0.005128025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008916667,0.000030388315,0.000059261,0.000037096885,0.00005280961,9.508588e-7,0.003487868,6.418202e-8,0.000002364456,0.011068877,0.9847725,0.00039867082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043476806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048360215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96959895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044010967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036805464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213348931","doi":"","title":"Tracking Freedom of Conscience in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista General de Derecho Canónico y Derecho Eclesiástico del Estado - ISSN 1696-9669","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Conscience; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.031942409741512245,"score_gpt":0.2995063659590496,"score_spread":0.26756395621753737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213348931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9622251,0.02413349,0.00048207288,0.004314833,0.0014256547,0.001373946,0.00057642534,0.00012677007,0.0053417203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751511,0.015373016,0.0059397863,0.0010819298,0.0006446875,0.000087439126,0.00006352034,0.00012969309,0.0015288208],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98791105,0.0023102495,0.0025411258,0.0019754376,0.0023898678,0.0028722745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99299955,0.0019481005,0.0011941039,0.0011906723,0.001510345,0.0011572347],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002239199,0.0012338146,0.0023623684,0.00027822368,0.0012872018,0.0009950256,0.0018581158,0.0007347099,0.00067787524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054990854,0.0012858483,0.00061147375,0.003269996,0.0014092945,0.00075000076,0.0006577511,0.0015313042,0.00004831639],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000434257,0.0020818007,0.6262697,0.004670257,0.0014947882,0.004680999,0.022340115,0.01335638,0.042723667,0.049768683,0.04594989,0.18622944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008909274,0.000417607,0.6004182,0.008170863,0.0019134165,0.0003788716,0.06655297,0.021934317,0.022572068,0.00152386,0.25875956,0.008448998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92221427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91694754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21280967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008168365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0153800445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215614503","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0028","title":"On the breach: Identifying infringements of section 35 rights","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Scrutiny; Legislature; Constitution; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0310557196913512,"score_gpt":0.27036531051999246,"score_spread":0.23930959082864126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215614503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69737744,0.00041105476,0.00009700482,0.0010402541,0.00062599813,0.000080572754,0.0000037477444,0.000012175046,0.30035177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973245,0.00022676688,0.00018975505,0.000021795831,0.00010856161,2.3745173e-8,3.6474276e-7,0.0000013530359,0.0021268642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991838,0.00018667775,0.00008785967,0.00006862368,0.0003575042,0.00011555449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999422,0.00008778091,0.00015734394,0.00005871208,0.00022727055,0.000046882247],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003011133,0.000047006426,0.00009977773,0.000005990867,0.0018673701,0.00002842361,0.00017894812,0.000040275478,0.001407716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048009864,0.000036648773,0.00009895252,0.000034754037,0.00021206484,0.00034477562,0.00006341336,0.0001070443,0.000003328184],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015840931,0.00041387393,0.0048808246,0.00004455731,0.000973925,0.00014003314,0.41811907,0.000109268316,0.004581047,0.5523534,0.01408302,0.0041425615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017326971,0.00016312767,0.055461567,0.00042998474,0.00024911045,0.000017979824,0.38814864,0.000021947755,0.0022789221,0.0073559945,0.5437798,0.0003602252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17266087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3881525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5449974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052647904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003669361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217148283","doi":"","title":"Health Insurance, a False Dichotomy and a Negative Right to Abortion in Canada's Maritime Provinces","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Political science; Medicine; Actuarial science; Business; Pregnancy; Biology","score_opus":0.009402013738292563,"score_gpt":0.28266529734058654,"score_spread":0.27326328360229396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217148283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9677129,0.0041961577,6.638717e-7,0.0048838747,0.0007967691,0.0018443756,0.0001935454,0.000058828027,0.020312915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880056,0.0012528589,0.00035716922,0.0012382999,0.00028771983,0.0004207362,0.00023466923,0.000027079936,0.008175913],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969087,0.00045595132,0.0005286688,0.0006410494,0.00082108827,0.00064452266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857557,0.0001886764,0.00030875765,0.00015622508,0.0003063063,0.00046447353],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004118797,0.00033432015,0.0007064659,0.00006735487,0.0010410998,0.00023412255,0.0002541581,0.00020687845,0.00016976023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057689624,0.00030830962,0.00006714107,0.00060744234,0.00012694893,0.00033369366,0.000050878538,0.0005452657,0.000017860864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079252454,0.0006153624,0.4968025,0.0030063994,0.00083189004,0.0006295237,0.31576258,0.00007141264,0.00028758516,0.06772916,0.03933543,0.07413562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006326233,0.00006151737,0.79941475,0.0011397072,0.000019880026,8.4564135e-7,0.047266304,0.0000034758982,0.00011029895,0.0007104833,0.14990741,0.00073270814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9974481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30261225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026068229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037812204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217622965","doi":"10.29173/mlj892","title":"Is Justice Delayed, Justice Denied - Changing the Administration of the Winnipeg Family Violence Court","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; Administration of justice; Law; Political science; Administration (probate law); Sociology","score_opus":0.03596584371651016,"score_gpt":0.3041123822861501,"score_spread":0.26814653856963994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217622965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9568974,0.0005340673,0.0011270307,0.015799597,0.0027075196,0.00040473425,0.000010038843,0.000042295043,0.022477364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956699,0.0002788464,0.00023656852,0.0019911795,0.0017106315,0.0000068239465,4.090495e-7,0.000009309639,0.00009631928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977953,0.00047010605,0.00033216015,0.00014896107,0.00083662925,0.0004168825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858856,0.0003806354,0.0003741068,0.00017753293,0.0003839127,0.00009527829],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015431393,0.00014466494,0.00017082025,0.000019857915,0.005474508,0.0002309022,0.0006910118,0.000087735636,0.000034292447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048351494,0.00007992979,0.00014203695,0.00027126307,0.00062622497,0.00025596097,0.00011215312,0.0004051466,0.000025651094],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000768772,0.0005762895,0.008188908,0.00047960453,0.001031425,0.000061069535,0.2981039,0.00085713103,0.0063942783,0.54649675,0.031249262,0.10579264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080205465,0.00020520625,0.035944115,0.00043146368,0.0015475146,0.00008036031,0.8416085,0.0008873667,0.0011648729,0.0055611413,0.111257546,0.00050981826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009395703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054628722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54350466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015936952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007252765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W325273685","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Spare the child","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Corporal punishment; Spare time; Subject (documents); Sociology; Law; Psychology; Media studies; Criminology; Medicine; Political science; Humanities; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.015173071596037375,"score_gpt":0.26574861832853236,"score_spread":0.250575546732495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W325273685","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000079801226,0.18303111,0.0000019235235,0.73418486,0.0006919578,0.00015296903,0.000005746166,0.000018106424,0.08183354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015275087,0.27006605,0.000012676019,0.6713944,0.006202245,0.00001750581,0.0000021105145,0.000012196621,0.03701773],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676967,0.0004849756,0.00028465485,0.000101198624,0.0018235622,0.0005359489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980953,0.00021182281,0.00018479058,0.00006897536,0.0003271394,0.0011120093],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002165657,0.00008813156,0.00016711923,0.000025448446,0.0029629134,0.00012949212,0.00040513682,0.00019472839,0.06077017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006338513,0.00005654874,0.00012316344,0.00023971213,0.00014838263,0.00018033618,0.00001586892,0.0008824472,0.0008527854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.1748291e-7,0.0000046964356,0.001298666,0.0000037923057,0.00003191337,0.000024902185,0.0026373155,1.8439529e-7,1.924645e-8,0.00018875187,0.9879512,0.007858393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010965658,0.0000051544216,0.0025896973,0.00017003113,0.000018555722,0.00001815016,0.0012665208,0.0000117621785,9.687724e-8,0.000016256121,0.9957112,0.000082910636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012267291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11942876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10716147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014922594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036690006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W335530575","doi":"","title":"Aline Grenon and Louise Bélanger-Hardy, eds. Elements of Quebec civil law: A comparison with the common law of Canada / Éléments de common law canadienne","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Common law","score_opus":0.02019686419435443,"score_gpt":0.30882088386877005,"score_spread":0.28862401967441564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W335530575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98437726,0.00034375512,0.0000057322486,0.005169483,0.0001140501,0.00027708846,0.000048855964,0.0000055909895,0.009658169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983067,0.00003668007,0.00019128865,0.001244004,0.00011120571,0.0000058883147,0.0000025076815,0.000009744241,0.000091963004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742025,0.000749027,0.00058537856,0.00013105612,0.000655279,0.00045902355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99702615,0.00058797956,0.0014923702,0.00021390327,0.00043964095,0.00023998888],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001054071,0.00021866402,0.0009173987,0.000016931912,0.0009592454,0.000053474476,0.0006340991,0.000029391063,0.000030971078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009193505,0.00011660116,0.00007991738,0.000229393,0.0056215837,0.00016636049,0.00009492869,0.0005100857,4.054864e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016471718,0.000474169,0.04459801,0.000041367595,0.0016093015,0.000028964278,0.16123424,0.00035384757,0.0034089265,0.7778054,0.007527516,0.0012710938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00572441,0.0042680386,0.17121638,0.00063102064,0.0012387891,0.00007671661,0.27432254,0.00036152638,0.015825259,0.011399818,0.5134222,0.0015133123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9893398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99981284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7664056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026871674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002942557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99708456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W338172472","doi":"10.4324/9780429445620","title":"Legal Feminisms: theory and practice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03440998740964374,"score_gpt":0.35255494952350286,"score_spread":0.3181449621138591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W338172472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000163693,0.0019561043,0.000021557658,0.0037300342,0.0005304229,0.0003449916,0.00000859781,0.00014646171,0.9932455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00049362413,0.0018851553,0.0011050075,0.0014128473,0.0019647481,0.000014028357,0.0000063890434,0.000019871793,0.9930983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979708,0.0006212425,0.00019128178,0.00035527698,0.00053034787,0.00033100578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959549,0.0032819046,0.00018636503,0.00014150763,0.00029408323,0.0001412655],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024934057,0.00022876743,0.00029487355,0.000025521109,0.0011124775,0.00022828458,0.00024345562,0.00040858597,0.0013971623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004627609,0.00016848103,0.00008162361,0.00004591007,0.0018117382,0.00039692968,0.00019069556,0.00029349115,0.0005132143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002975378,0.000008149907,0.0000017173832,0.000011870602,0.00008089574,0.0000066156567,0.01689164,3.4488787e-9,7.3595976e-7,0.6280494,0.3532025,0.0017167259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008632082,0.000046896814,0.000017069391,0.000042489937,0.00010308673,0.0000032678522,0.019769153,7.15201e-8,0.0000013865206,0.012789069,0.96688634,0.0002548643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00167344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001649448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6152603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031868427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003370173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W340541376","doi":"","title":"Adiaphora: The Achilles Heel of the Windsor Report","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Law; Affection; Morality; Scrutiny; Sociology; Oath; Blessing; Obligation; Philosophy; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.04555931434003382,"score_gpt":0.36050943163171173,"score_spread":0.31495011729167793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W340541376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23349111,0.25280276,0.000033005806,0.11710297,0.0005852818,0.0028783516,0.00001070533,0.00015501404,0.39294082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95775366,0.034694538,0.000072167015,0.0048403516,0.00021616695,0.000029133818,0.0000010827847,0.0000050881717,0.0023877851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802095,0.0005211599,0.00042696286,0.0002071447,0.0004706936,0.0003530788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825585,0.00082151085,0.0003233102,0.00035996697,0.00015520782,0.0000841809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037699998,0.00012785663,0.00035375755,0.0000067418614,0.00074780826,0.000013317726,0.000724407,0.00008568148,0.00044216408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005885628,0.000047419246,0.0003242483,0.0004752011,0.0018513452,0.00004450172,0.00020682755,0.00022966141,0.000025116875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026705235,0.00021834663,0.06844049,0.00030953847,0.00020747347,0.00007383105,0.009207662,7.7199553e-7,0.000117810894,0.75799453,0.04218044,0.12122241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005187974,0.000026015507,0.17438935,0.00031828464,0.00007260449,0.00001025394,0.0018742131,1.298806e-7,0.000040548446,0.0026172516,0.82048655,0.00011293126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009264693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001012392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7783061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054399905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044096003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7046072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W346843878","doi":"","title":"La Spécificité Patrimoniale De L’Union De Fait : Le Libre Choix Et Ses « Dommages Collatéraux » (The Patrimonial Specificity of the De Facto Union: Free Choice and 'Collateral Damage')","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.01554706558513847,"score_gpt":0.2718794179956099,"score_spread":0.2563323524104714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W346843878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9362528,0.018099302,0.00060643005,0.037944533,0.0005754955,0.0005187276,0.000039113736,0.000034040728,0.0059296037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969788,0.022682162,0.0002671435,0.00017054881,0.00089489395,0.000010393591,0.0000012776674,0.00004020521,0.0061453423],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894643,0.0060776537,0.0005759944,0.00036456433,0.00067370094,0.002843822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771285,0.0008849648,0.0005959231,0.0003400539,0.00021962447,0.00024656134],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071239662,0.00042873644,0.000497296,0.00005415618,0.0026221443,0.00039214286,0.001034405,0.00043572023,0.000067882844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009059482,0.00029163546,0.00035926263,0.000756767,0.0014357436,0.00056338107,0.00026740954,0.0029907173,0.000004402813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018937224,0.00082875806,0.47492978,0.00016272893,0.0013891539,0.0000355641,0.10024227,0.0017252839,0.0042533097,0.3590254,0.005380828,0.051837556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042138817,0.0006233138,0.35261005,0.00031881855,0.0005900456,0.00065981416,0.12750995,0.00022747992,0.002179384,0.15142334,0.35851464,0.0011292833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040580023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.095820315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35313383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027028704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052918303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W348736023","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1208","title":"Charter Eviction: Litigating Out of House and Home","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Charter; Eviction; Appeal; Political science; Law; Justiciability; Politics","score_opus":0.07835314801454228,"score_gpt":0.36866566256107675,"score_spread":0.29031251454653445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W348736023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96514565,0.00046668795,0.0000031697496,0.019869816,0.00026494692,0.00006191764,0.000003867131,0.000013659837,0.014170293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958004,0.00019198089,0.00009088969,0.00048642317,0.003204077,5.732283e-7,8.6286896e-8,0.000005302962,0.00022027497],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991522,0.00011534447,0.00023582128,0.000052341962,0.00029147236,0.0001528315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928963,0.000046495676,0.00024688986,0.000020277406,0.00026363722,0.00013305387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005314175,0.00006368767,0.00022958417,0.000026146578,0.0004714446,0.000057655194,0.000061814244,0.0000731006,0.000004056347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014944967,0.00004854984,0.00006276769,0.000057692043,0.00052062183,0.0002724766,0.0000318464,0.00011770656,0.000001368747],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030912517,0.00004185412,0.003921514,0.000034726687,0.00010488181,0.0000045020606,0.77510774,3.2792641e-7,0.00024427008,0.21367496,0.0022025458,0.0046317517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005000215,0.00084913557,0.084250934,0.0002398434,0.00025820956,0.00002886663,0.33121115,0.000008196798,0.0002694855,0.056461535,0.52066046,0.0007619618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055726287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075449166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51845795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008333421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009866088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84241843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W379435648","doi":"10.26530/oapen_569531","title":"Law, Privacy and Surveillance in Canada in the Post-Snowden Era","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Electronic surveillance; Internet privacy; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.0268775673353654,"score_gpt":0.2799775066940706,"score_spread":0.25309993935870523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W379435648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015187129,0.0017198077,3.3651517e-8,0.012815885,0.00020099593,0.0006073536,0.000028967435,0.0000161497,0.96942365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.520281,0.00071507145,0.00004042634,0.0023597814,0.0003811414,0.00003947706,0.000028962353,0.000016678963,0.47613743],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998222,0.00029187556,0.00022690346,0.00025092813,0.000656063,0.00035221712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991016,0.00045673866,0.00008380268,0.00014127331,0.0001393939,0.00007722295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008939913,0.0001819495,0.0003323139,0.00002037119,0.00023835365,0.00008010151,0.00045573156,0.00014653537,0.00008248598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035318316,0.00011187685,0.00002708193,0.00010190175,0.00028809463,0.00009721236,0.00013364687,0.0003930533,0.000010126515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023179255,0.00003444244,0.0726464,0.00007452742,0.000060772054,0.0001343101,0.15956809,0.0000041133762,7.6941484e-7,0.10003251,0.6636142,0.003806659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021255786,0.000010389804,0.07013603,0.00002851576,0.0000030004326,5.73511e-7,0.010753822,0.0000012668618,8.2277694e-8,0.0016810928,0.9169271,0.00024554427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99759614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5050939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022403626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027034392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.585847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W37987877","doi":"10.21991/c94m3j","title":"BLACK V. CHRÉTIEN AND THE CONTROL OF THE ROYAL PREROGATIVE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Bishops; Prerogative; Irish; Law; Political science; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02540320267826208,"score_gpt":0.25683856222810253,"score_spread":0.23143535954984046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W37987877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.096586704,0.004033856,0.023537591,0.045771778,0.0036629871,0.0052919467,0.0005165044,0.00024852203,0.8203501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980182,0.00006777725,0.00018360227,0.00072485575,0.000105015,0.00008374972,0.0000029906557,0.00000410931,0.0008096665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793077,0.00032439787,0.0004120628,0.00028663542,0.00054746255,0.00049869454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984972,0.00044557062,0.00027497276,0.00022774686,0.00043447228,0.00012007734],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068337575,0.00021786113,0.00033263373,0.000034415505,0.003206373,0.000049808077,0.00048726538,0.00014362807,0.00020281614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013460969,0.00011916918,0.00024166268,0.00024242343,0.054571528,0.00030076914,0.00022343891,0.0002514576,0.000036485304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011435527,0.000044848108,0.029110009,0.0000072555927,0.0001435323,0.0000010620951,0.007038129,0.00009207874,0.000007886101,0.96211934,0.0011404704,0.00018103697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02699236,0.00024160263,0.11559173,0.00073404046,0.0012298002,0.00005384174,0.20166744,0.00294387,0.0010723703,0.2434256,0.40400466,0.0020427012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030127263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015423475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9014315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015151918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006450633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99809134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W380316835","doi":"","title":"An Unauthorized Admiralty Court in British Columbia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œWashington historical quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; History; High Court; Political science","score_opus":0.016889002882237537,"score_gpt":0.2800695360922619,"score_spread":0.2631805332100243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W380316835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98737293,0.00014536873,0.00003810999,0.004031477,0.00313665,0.0005336259,0.0000094995285,0.0002755949,0.004456721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894485,0.000015721771,0.00045707735,0.00022722437,0.0009236071,0.00007584578,0.0000054017232,0.000023871511,0.008822775],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712,0.00051189,0.00044437067,0.00047588273,0.00076317956,0.00068465597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986837,0.00029729822,0.00015835914,0.0003409672,0.00017681524,0.00034289318],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014331534,0.0001583904,0.00037126493,0.000028253202,0.0018163664,0.0008168322,0.00083353795,0.00030770636,0.00046492947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022748753,0.00018109224,0.00014687543,0.0004573428,0.0004349787,0.000518885,0.000027244692,0.00097342103,0.000087135624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008192051,0.0016956034,0.16757904,0.00004609726,0.00009108078,0.00018697458,0.34592822,0.000003023066,0.0051580304,0.0043455944,0.24330519,0.23157923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007352704,0.00034682217,0.13678016,0.000019521987,0.000027401771,0.0000041812727,0.011772374,0.00008149808,0.0000012549075,0.0025678675,0.84715927,0.0005043594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6441862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96199167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6038541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013831273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012989274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W406165647","doi":"","title":"M. E. Reisner, ed. — The Diary of a Country Clergyman, 1848-1851: James Reid","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Histoire sociale","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Art; Theology; Sociology","score_opus":0.020054432946000265,"score_gpt":0.2720973835061603,"score_spread":0.25204295056016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W406165647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30339423,0.028890964,0.000031075324,0.04337018,0.0036265713,0.0010997009,0.000058031015,0.0004404443,0.61908877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9571071,0.0034240477,0.00009674891,0.0008176397,0.0012040344,0.000055050063,0.000008932164,0.00002345947,0.037262946],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978634,0.00039425047,0.00032953647,0.00026002037,0.000680127,0.00047265878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878764,0.00036830854,0.00025998958,0.00023536675,0.00025722687,0.00009146427],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008533173,0.00017631821,0.00032476024,0.000025141399,0.0044534816,0.00006891464,0.00047174486,0.00019328199,0.00043410185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007915606,0.000131636,0.00019580206,0.00043381684,0.003214916,0.00022076859,0.00010572356,0.0002451059,0.00007317746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008315611,0.0002970257,0.014611208,0.000051174073,0.00022674889,0.000030500496,0.16070977,0.000010025563,0.00048660813,0.09584326,0.67035854,0.057292003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021692886,0.000017674058,0.006712411,0.000027029775,0.00003790561,8.4964813e-7,0.029089114,0.0000035165422,0.000018768487,0.0011104352,0.96257156,0.00019377908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035492335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0151700415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6537129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059423165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027101478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205364919","doi":"10.1590/1809-43412021v18a706","title":"Indigenous Legal Resurgence as a Path to Reconciliation: Three Case Studies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vibrant Virtual Brazilian Anthropology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Honour; Autonomy; Sovereignty; Law; Political science; Self-determination; Indigenous rights; Intervention (counseling); Plaintiff; Human rights; Sociology; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.04644267438590562,"score_gpt":0.37521793838071854,"score_spread":0.32877526399481294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205364919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9484576,0.0045654085,0.0002527747,0.032883666,0.003943802,0.0007836594,0.00009300279,0.00030250286,0.00871756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98896915,0.0024537947,0.0008439868,0.0023365538,0.0007970202,0.00007982924,0.0000117293785,0.000029114166,0.004478812],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962804,0.00070060545,0.00058979966,0.00084203837,0.00057715,0.0010100184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766684,0.0007049328,0.00017323384,0.00039199085,0.00065917143,0.0004038297],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075126364,0.00034591457,0.0006816677,0.00009752558,0.0035621256,0.00013910075,0.00035882104,0.00027883705,0.0022488073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00366002,0.00031171256,0.00019281494,0.00093079143,0.0025445423,0.00045974128,0.00034523386,0.00034364092,0.0009804702],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040751806,0.0006886866,0.009428968,0.00013138392,0.0013501578,0.060518097,0.6116041,0.00006443272,0.0036850767,0.1416048,0.041564617,0.1289522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001276945,0.0013233833,0.003005766,0.00013954243,0.0001545465,0.0030011584,0.6006223,0.000021050348,0.0041447403,0.002688647,0.38213858,0.0014833282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021867128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11478226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34057397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048433445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007087967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205521505","doi":"10.7202/1084133ar","title":"Domestic Contracts and Family Law Exceptionalism: An Historical Perspective","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exceptionalism; Supreme court; Law; Trilogy; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Family law; Ideology; Common law; Sociology; Law and economics; History","score_opus":0.04775251357453432,"score_gpt":0.33325647215850085,"score_spread":0.28550395858396654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205521505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15887696,0.008029599,0.0000424242,0.029013231,0.0022234328,0.0002556915,0.000044123204,0.00013332252,0.80138123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961374,0.0005574873,0.0007807179,0.0009530645,0.0008168599,0.0000040022896,0.0000013780005,0.000009097218,0.00073999795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983531,0.00035807228,0.00020241807,0.00022465603,0.0005273862,0.00033434553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986283,0.0001858934,0.00009872126,0.00006839319,0.000666318,0.0003523837],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044220747,0.0001232754,0.00022848093,0.000014168292,0.0071381624,0.00017700101,0.000119441786,0.00009886949,0.0001821299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000371416,0.00010179934,0.000087689536,0.00011129329,0.00042590557,0.0005282535,0.000047260975,0.0003498462,0.000018258608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013097693,0.00009524706,0.00011844929,0.0000019676968,0.000052089534,0.00021973113,0.006217305,0.000004631617,0.00032903595,0.9917635,0.0005081724,0.0006768127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057061104,0.000065085835,0.008326436,0.000020646214,0.000051201827,0.00016148463,0.023913514,0.0000037010616,0.000023507253,0.01478095,0.951859,0.00022386115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031368725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060948826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97698253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016397123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028554254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205661382","doi":"10.7202/1044784ar","title":"OBLIGATIONS","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.08676104256253049,"score_gpt":0.2861900552721924,"score_spread":0.1994290127096619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205661382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38023725,0.018163575,0.0003459208,0.12914605,0.017218256,0.001050904,0.00009006503,0.0003192711,0.4534287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9270474,0.0027124838,0.0034050175,0.00037875623,0.0027917405,0.000037233593,0.000006711424,0.000020193596,0.06360048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984648,0.00021750103,0.00029489514,0.00030225024,0.00022460436,0.00049590867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912906,0.00015743192,0.00014656059,0.00019249925,0.00018830897,0.00018612211],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034662746,0.00019320859,0.00026993497,0.000025737769,0.0010342547,0.00005381776,0.00031137152,0.00022271468,0.0034036748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043190937,0.0001870716,0.00019236408,0.00045772913,0.0006747005,0.00041872653,0.00011827722,0.00022414427,0.0028973904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008528649,0.00023672877,0.02204134,0.00007212074,0.00015969315,0.000025289479,0.24798563,0.000009735153,0.000036639438,0.70014113,0.017775144,0.011507985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002735319,0.00005771472,0.09591156,0.00013476016,0.00018357667,0.000005359322,0.009093949,0.00013113857,0.00005383546,0.008683919,0.88504374,0.00042689106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033557855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005685256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8672686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035728994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006320502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99787897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205697385","doi":"10.1215/00141801-9404373","title":"Decolonizing Discipline: Children, Corporal Punishment, Christian Theologies, and Reconciliation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnohistory","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ontario Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Corporal punishment; Sociology; Power (physics); Punishment (psychology); Law; Criminology; History; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.03732363463630916,"score_gpt":0.30646208276299847,"score_spread":0.2691384481266893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205697385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9739721,0.005436745,0.000012753456,0.0072831344,0.0011019892,0.00042688195,0.000024821382,0.00020949179,0.011532116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99406654,0.00019112763,0.00032128475,0.00029062683,0.00019429601,0.000084795196,0.00002121014,0.000008957423,0.00482114],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864036,0.00032304606,0.00016215489,0.00026089663,0.00034220965,0.00027131816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994824,0.000131029,0.00015272165,0.00010845646,0.000046192774,0.00007918781],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008593782,0.00010706463,0.00014995098,0.000037148653,0.0033862395,0.000030258761,0.00021068429,0.00005684867,0.00042733105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033222762,0.000103770035,0.000047933,0.00015539848,0.00057225366,0.00015360056,0.0002710208,0.00028672512,0.000011585838],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007049487,0.00018415251,0.36864722,0.000023109904,0.00014618512,0.000019311901,0.41995442,0.0000867552,0.00038079068,0.022660797,0.15552182,0.03230495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005639883,0.00011611329,0.45368344,0.000007735017,0.000041525487,0.000002740885,0.056590363,0.000031933705,0.000014321682,0.0017471141,0.4867661,0.00043463684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007951627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004285204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36336404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011739493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010545738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206099060","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u16484","title":"Fricker, Rt Rev. Joachim Carl, (1 Dec. 1927–28 Oct. 2018), a Suffragan Bishop of Toronto (Bishop of Credit Valley), 1985–95","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities; Art history","score_opus":0.04410510492442354,"score_gpt":0.32212053802848856,"score_spread":0.278015433104065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206099060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02132259,0.14527921,0.000024998204,0.0012142727,0.0059038512,0.0021160138,0.0010407371,0.00027201464,0.8228263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.039443556,0.6076286,0.0012281418,0.0004353469,0.009939501,0.00017928745,0.0005789664,0.0002627948,0.34030384],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912753,0.0007172622,0.0018669356,0.0012755638,0.0031543118,0.001710593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99447787,0.0009139612,0.0016561046,0.001012988,0.0012985943,0.0006405041],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018782889,0.001103256,0.002810042,0.00015231268,0.0011025458,0.00017225921,0.0020325424,0.0019485987,0.001515085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018918787,0.00093668164,0.0010523462,0.000694609,0.0016922827,0.0006435331,0.00071755826,0.0010292772,0.00006577524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009228119,0.000275345,0.0034151347,0.00084003195,0.00080200756,0.00002622217,0.03333353,0.000002952232,0.000016239022,0.001866991,0.947309,0.012020239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007964342,0.00022867582,0.006189482,0.0017138605,0.0004702119,0.0000027998467,0.0141192265,0.000007194386,0.00007733965,0.00022263693,0.9750659,0.0011062579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27042845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1895234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4825225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018892903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010194305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206126061","doi":"10.3886/icpsr03342","title":"CBS News Monthly Poll #1, April 2001","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"ICPSR Data Holdings","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental science; Meteorology; History","score_opus":0.10291645827608262,"score_gpt":0.3639484480485557,"score_spread":0.2610319897724731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206126061","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015148829,0.0025785025,0.000001749482,0.0053800144,0.0018450284,0.00076414243,0.98231137,0.00022993183,0.006737767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000042689433,0.01740737,0.00033870683,0.0014007739,0.0034253562,0.00004907871,0.9714578,0.000043164157,0.0058350777],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994573,0.00029542166,0.00066986436,0.0014356868,0.0015173756,0.00150867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958872,0.00033127473,0.0005763373,0.0024727155,0.00021864401,0.00051381503],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001284329,0.0006894542,0.0009180514,0.00014271186,0.00174428,0.0006932202,0.005183272,0.0008404722,0.0028872704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030009586,0.0006066651,0.00020273413,0.00075531856,0.0009612552,0.0012871741,0.002442071,0.0009746698,0.002113497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013375732,0.00008658946,0.00013195815,0.000040770286,0.00013312895,0.00006862978,0.0008792012,0.0000010678133,0.000002713225,0.000054915272,0.9973025,0.0012851983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003210914,0.000028159995,0.00018383277,0.00011681335,0.00020214815,0.000002264052,0.002883843,0.0000046146333,0.0000012919621,0.00008484896,0.9953931,0.0007780143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37078524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13505776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23572747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006194076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029189634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206165822","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.17004091.v1","title":"Non-Consensual, Deceitful and Misattributed Paternity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"North Bristol NHS Trust; Amicus Therapeutics; Accident Compensation Corporation","keywords":"Statutory law; Tort; Context (archaeology); Liability; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.033566421608171707,"score_gpt":0.3327959033337531,"score_spread":0.2992294817255814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206165822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92641705,0.00049573247,0.0000013840826,0.0007260189,0.0006552308,0.0006154067,0.000015477159,0.000120841636,0.07095284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8252212,0.0011012277,0.00018695813,0.00012834439,0.0002768189,0.00006966499,0.00022739201,0.000019190597,0.17276925],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985303,0.000100129066,0.00024302301,0.00033507423,0.000400513,0.00039091858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903345,0.00016193932,0.00015253178,0.00010638449,0.0003645553,0.00018112484],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022968955,0.00025158882,0.0003617055,0.000036557685,0.0010079045,0.0002133958,0.00017584977,0.00043572846,0.0011538024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003296713,0.00019275284,0.000085275555,0.00012350934,0.0002218354,0.00014854812,0.000033141838,0.00025062388,0.00033906597],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014384928,0.0003207394,0.06450044,0.00071671815,0.0010619675,0.000036254198,0.45503706,7.275254e-7,0.003143188,0.0056102434,0.43413332,0.035295498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008510667,0.000070798975,0.5801735,0.00020737707,0.00022063768,9.797529e-7,0.2432761,0.000020454818,0.0017505019,0.00078383397,0.17116256,0.0014821741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08232464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04591868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5156731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001247698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009386308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206433164","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501755262.003.0001","title":"Introduction","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cornell University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Early modern period; Period (music); Geography; History; Economic history; Genealogy; Law; Ancient history; Art","score_opus":0.05516664713762885,"score_gpt":0.23172673296215324,"score_spread":0.17656008582452437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206433164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006523192,0.0003430186,0.000037089998,0.00029875906,0.000784992,0.00027537876,0.000024734958,0.00015747744,0.9980133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016572528,0.00093820394,0.000057537738,0.000036507543,0.0016193232,4.1825572e-7,0.000023288476,0.0000180899,0.9956494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987627,0.00008856082,0.000118523836,0.00048229692,0.00028452103,0.0002633419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990581,0.000066641114,0.0001591967,0.00025755086,0.00032408335,0.0001344299],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013704259,0.00022376755,0.00030097636,0.000035793382,0.0008279424,0.00006879781,0.0003325719,0.00038496038,0.00052976067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050834304,0.00025272672,0.00020001565,0.000009958427,0.00063374225,0.0000955662,0.0002742784,0.0003676754,0.000060046772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016565966,0.000006129967,0.0000024109495,0.000021369739,0.00011042862,0.00007156235,0.0033648207,0.00000552299,0.000008872002,0.9535899,0.040597662,0.002204727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013895235,0.000011360721,0.000013592798,0.00003514814,0.00013178175,8.0775004e-7,0.0013129367,0.0000020089956,0.000022865539,0.0005981093,0.99744344,0.00028898657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022608694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007796296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95684576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054687087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000102066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206748978","doi":"10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah19021.pub2","title":"<i>Bucellarii</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Encyclopedia of Ancient History","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.024692494397666704,"score_gpt":0.2646223713587126,"score_spread":0.23992987696104587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206748978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010743729,0.094164245,0.0000032336914,0.00049320847,0.0038444833,0.0003084494,0.000011695445,0.00009577298,0.9009715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00017906132,0.017541414,0.00019749501,0.00045923,0.0013053982,0.000022400887,0.000011605358,0.000100366684,0.980183],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981239,0.00026445134,0.00023299616,0.00028986126,0.00072945986,0.0003593304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896926,0.00012739598,0.0003451991,0.0003629806,0.0000988356,0.00009632117],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004746251,0.00021290363,0.00037814866,0.000053602274,0.00026784168,0.000007114963,0.0005745271,0.00024990077,0.009347108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002669518,0.00015141083,0.00020111544,0.00016053671,0.0012464629,0.000023817607,0.00013457511,0.00026797983,0.00012796136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001602111,0.000037343227,0.00006282012,0.00004521197,0.000042157943,0.0000042136903,0.01764337,3.5522046e-7,0.000023362505,0.001864172,0.97960013,0.0006752743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008008143,0.000009278894,0.00022025093,0.00009142332,0.000051256793,1.9302209e-7,0.0022429295,1.7750604e-7,0.0000023461328,0.000012988155,0.9970942,0.00019483303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013133709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077022593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07921155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007844413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004862467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99343795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4207081363","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.17004091","title":"Non-Consensual, Deceitful and Misattributed Paternity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"North Bristol NHS Trust; Amicus Therapeutics; Accident Compensation Corporation","keywords":"Statutory law; Tort; Context (archaeology); Liability; Political science; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.033566421608171707,"score_gpt":0.3327959033337531,"score_spread":0.2992294817255814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4207081363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92641705,0.00049573247,0.0000013840826,0.0007260189,0.0006552308,0.0006154067,0.000015477159,0.000120841636,0.07095284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8252212,0.0011012277,0.00018695813,0.00012834439,0.0002768189,0.00006966499,0.00022739201,0.000019190597,0.17276925],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985303,0.000100129066,0.00024302301,0.00033507423,0.000400513,0.00039091858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903345,0.00016193932,0.00015253178,0.00010638449,0.0003645553,0.00018112484],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022968955,0.00025158882,0.0003617055,0.000036557685,0.0010079045,0.0002133958,0.00017584977,0.00043572846,0.0011538024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003296713,0.00019275284,0.000085275555,0.00012350934,0.0002218354,0.00014854812,0.000033141838,0.00025062388,0.00033906597],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014384928,0.0003207394,0.06450044,0.00071671815,0.0010619675,0.000036254198,0.45503706,7.275254e-7,0.003143188,0.0056102434,0.43413332,0.035295498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008510667,0.000070798975,0.5801735,0.00020737707,0.00022063768,9.797529e-7,0.2432761,0.000020454818,0.0017505019,0.00078383397,0.17116256,0.0014821741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08232464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04591868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5156731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001247698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009386308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210654285","doi":"10.1093/obo/9780195399301-0461","title":"Bathsua Makin","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Renaissance and Reformation","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hebrew; Brother; Nothing; Classics; Literature; History; Philosophy; Art; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.039375730456230065,"score_gpt":0.31427782144400224,"score_spread":0.2749020909877722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210654285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002917014,0.046422277,0.000027592283,0.002811992,0.0013684193,0.00035915364,0.0000416,0.00011841588,0.9459335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11183573,0.71773994,0.00040857733,0.0002809216,0.0028690856,0.000078107914,0.00053532963,0.000027735392,0.16622455],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985062,0.0001487579,0.0002787493,0.00024002415,0.0004992434,0.00032704056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992997,0.000046704376,0.00023957329,0.00013049162,0.00018832635,0.0000952254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002756761,0.00019937447,0.0003375794,0.000046821693,0.0010496719,0.00017046694,0.00014364887,0.00042965027,0.00014209078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016294201,0.00013923939,0.00008952008,0.00020284814,0.000256345,0.00042484034,0.000088305525,0.000343721,0.00006386921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009586492,0.000036948848,0.00028927097,0.0007093666,0.000117393625,0.000009761249,0.029882995,0.0000013938567,0.0000026494101,0.0075797583,0.70886064,0.25250024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012154469,0.000011276726,0.0013110173,0.0006329177,0.000030504276,0.000001657475,0.005025365,0.000005498199,0.000011448194,0.0001838762,0.99243695,0.00022794558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001552522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001198838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.779709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000300412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000137033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8073334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212797079","doi":"10.26686/jnzs.ins33.7382","title":"Finding Our Way to the Island: Critical Reflections from Two Emerging Pacific Legal Academics in Aotearoa","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of New Zealand studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Victoria University; University of Canterbury; Victoria University of Wellington; York University; University of Otago; Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand","keywords":"Aotearoa; Scholarship; Sociology; Jurisprudence; Political science; Project commissioning; Pacific studies; Publishing; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.12926313776817436,"score_gpt":0.4431104570463726,"score_spread":0.3138473192781982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212797079","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4849089,0.00899286,0.00006598105,0.5006133,0.0027989782,0.00014988564,0.000014438971,0.000023392095,0.0024322732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97281,0.0055370587,0.0012013285,0.00046830904,0.004005177,0.000004049679,6.936861e-7,0.000010500555,0.015962888],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981572,0.00027098708,0.00046932747,0.00016977618,0.0005409283,0.000391795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865955,0.00061907875,0.00014143667,0.00007980175,0.00034732206,0.00015282807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008123358,0.00013793111,0.00039893764,0.0000680231,0.0010223459,0.0001384275,0.00022082977,0.00007566399,0.000022319204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035315352,0.000085102445,0.00014824154,0.00047619757,0.00008749994,0.00027110107,0.0001297811,0.0006781392,0.000013182213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079660254,0.00006285787,0.037875257,0.0000095507385,0.000548856,0.00021008999,0.53973705,0.00043341733,0.0006430108,0.0014473855,0.41285324,0.006099659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049599883,0.000047508536,0.020874992,0.00015356301,0.00007852963,0.000015136104,0.33729532,0.0000070565948,0.00005878666,0.002951476,0.6378645,0.00015714644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035548897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040856164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50014496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030109758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012564911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9766457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213086076","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab129","title":"Judicial amendment and our constitutional lives: A reply to Emmett Macfarlane","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutionalism; Law; Secession; Judicial interpretation; Constitutional theory; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Supreme court; Normative; Judicial review; Originalism; Judicial restraint; Constitutional interpretation; Judicial activism; Constitutional amendment; Constitutional law; Sociology; Philosophy; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.03469044570718269,"score_gpt":0.3524611504676337,"score_spread":0.317770704760451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213086076","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13374756,0.004602378,0.01388755,0.4311943,0.016687522,0.0007595699,0.0005930601,0.00011788295,0.39841017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98595333,0.00026208392,0.00422116,0.007059935,0.0018930386,0.000006520821,0.000012814782,0.000003311152,0.0005877884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748933,0.00014446408,0.0005335583,0.00021291299,0.0013831209,0.00023661173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971176,0.00019677055,0.00025998862,0.00006258022,0.002082889,0.00028017804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058867247,0.0001431313,0.0002601606,0.00009343781,0.0005916882,0.00021617867,0.00030663874,0.00005795045,0.00026697715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010863364,0.00012884579,0.00015137343,0.00013921148,0.00210265,0.00042122678,0.00014395724,0.00022670299,0.000050105667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008776197,0.000104523875,0.0014837413,0.000002774231,0.00030862752,0.0004252879,0.0013258226,0.00010914015,0.0006287388,0.9894004,0.005519351,0.0006038361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009797709,0.000060776194,0.0014125843,0.0001757036,0.00005626648,0.0006734467,0.00501707,0.000003672296,0.0005928328,0.008845655,0.98195827,0.00022395271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000647244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004071651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98055476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004905291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011177489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77473015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213371845","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u186681","title":"Gwynne, Hon. John Wellington, (30 March 1814–7 Jan. 1902), Puisne Judge, Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; History; Art history","score_opus":0.031100056983118008,"score_gpt":0.30104816515770344,"score_spread":0.2699481081745854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213371845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004383896,0.031341117,0.000015871045,0.007823571,0.006834424,0.0014167731,0.0006046349,0.00026344994,0.9473163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012072865,0.18499477,0.0002646332,0.0014834779,0.00930795,0.000127409,0.00040638002,0.00016068241,0.7911818],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915597,0.000508894,0.0010577036,0.0013135597,0.003195928,0.0023642313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99621737,0.00079424697,0.00063903816,0.0006788729,0.0008279055,0.00084255385],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001273095,0.0010142894,0.0017075185,0.00019656756,0.0028263675,0.00041576408,0.0017220691,0.0013411664,0.0026881127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00080330926,0.00087577116,0.000429667,0.0009809512,0.0010215726,0.0002533267,0.00049315265,0.0020561283,0.00048808634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018815037,0.00005304429,0.0010345672,0.00025542895,0.00029150446,0.00010164555,0.0041205306,0.0000061726514,4.8449255e-7,0.0013782663,0.97501713,0.017722392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035524607,0.000039965347,0.00457377,0.0006959093,0.00015326146,0.0000017659745,0.004877057,0.0000073312,0.000018856746,0.00017017873,0.9879556,0.0011510648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9338983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96547294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15613444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035425895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034702227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213383224","doi":"10.5040/9781474201148","title":"Constitutionalising Secession","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Constitutionalism; Political science; Law; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.047245267385436385,"score_gpt":0.3040293719049521,"score_spread":0.2567841045195157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213383224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004738284,0.00032596706,0.0000784224,0.0038447457,0.0019518672,0.00038762804,0.000038201957,0.00043212628,0.99289364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0059776055,0.000023857747,0.00038755365,0.0011603702,0.00420718,0.000030980078,0.0001422044,0.000036573234,0.98803365],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969022,0.00028045944,0.0003996437,0.0005230895,0.0013084543,0.0005861265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807876,0.0004654874,0.00039171358,0.0002609683,0.00053402584,0.00026901776],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016433666,0.00033989237,0.0004766854,0.00010862767,0.0026184896,0.003032292,0.00073226006,0.000804488,0.0004352408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017615784,0.00029347133,0.00023053522,0.000050354676,0.0012628946,0.0011187885,0.00029176113,0.0009222285,0.00023548874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026151963,0.0000042927873,0.000017935246,0.000033813718,0.00003944076,0.000005348727,0.004847218,9.703818e-7,0.000008815616,0.39579767,0.595382,0.0038598806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000165339,0.0000070390606,0.000033528366,0.00044415228,0.0000441064,0.0000013308045,0.00046631473,0.0000027956085,0.00000771048,0.008183878,0.9902499,0.0003939158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017570975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023130572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3948679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010692783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011989324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214608750","doi":"10.1080/17432200.2021.2018850","title":"Walking the Law throughout the Journey of Nishiyuu","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Material Religion","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Parliament; Colonialism; Sociology; Law; Corporate governance; Gender studies; Media studies; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.03082741436507311,"score_gpt":0.3274804231641635,"score_spread":0.29665300879909035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214608750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9234097,0.00047105184,0.0000027391588,0.024782246,0.002673598,0.00042253977,0.000023002804,0.00006667043,0.048148464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980235,0.00021896487,0.000019342671,0.0006672358,0.0004917852,0.000044033855,0.0000030286637,0.000007085175,0.00052503473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846,0.00050560106,0.00018505675,0.000110993096,0.00051939365,0.00021893227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951357,0.0001358356,0.00013972599,0.0001371861,0.000051347473,0.000022351971],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009408704,0.0000752563,0.0001197627,0.000006254899,0.0032323045,0.000118255964,0.0004385845,0.00003103635,0.0003005049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011946194,0.000038599537,0.00007567233,0.00013947175,0.00041128555,0.00008204024,0.000291043,0.00013002298,0.000013509414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014630037,0.00006702604,0.00067814096,0.000020761452,0.000102879516,0.0000058413325,0.269628,0.000083688436,0.013551436,0.65054417,0.06350706,0.0016646965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001748521,0.000055475273,0.0014504163,0.000010544319,0.000037520396,0.000002017374,0.03208028,0.0000035857036,0.0030754476,0.00922964,0.9537531,0.0001271048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03636215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012824555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89024603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013371809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026666381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99806535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220654799","doi":"10.1017/s0008423922000051","title":"The Place of Constitutional Conventions in the Constitutional Architecture, and in the Courts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Justiciability; Law; Invocation; Political science; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Politics; Enforcement; Meaning (existential); Political question; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029833266156804313,"score_gpt":0.313623137289305,"score_spread":0.2837898711325007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220654799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85550493,0.00082130224,0.00006515429,0.12288413,0.00050590903,0.00032401615,0.00007190532,0.0000016076549,0.019821033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99903536,0.000008382542,0.000033377182,0.00082041556,0.000068353474,0.000007060818,2.5853473e-7,5.319692e-7,0.0000262408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796027,0.00046123852,0.00023881556,0.00008104427,0.0007595714,0.00049906585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828416,0.0011880425,0.000081925755,0.00006117942,0.0001335144,0.0002511603],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004752363,0.000051013765,0.000089481975,0.000085465756,0.0030749063,0.00010936507,0.0007245576,0.000016949765,0.00005778012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002381312,0.000025615955,0.00004186232,0.0004564902,0.025184903,0.00011208353,0.00003409563,0.00038038875,6.1256895e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028830914,0.000010117746,0.008150263,8.594088e-7,0.000002381869,0.000019936113,0.0055641867,0.00011741723,0.000005005659,0.9857465,0.00031519227,0.00006527866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004729708,0.00008257029,0.6683195,0.00003660691,0.000017325792,0.00035712548,0.10445447,0.00004686525,0.0000063626594,0.099144965,0.12692712,0.0001340876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042783882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13113149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8866015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051239296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044437484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99822295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220733525","doi":"10.5663/aps.v10i1.29399","title":"Determining the “Core of Indianness:” A Feminist Political Economy of NIL/TU,O v. BCGEU","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"aboriginal policy studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Queen's University; University of Ottawa; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Jurisdiction; Political science; Supreme court; Law; Politics; Sociology; Trade union; Political economy; Economics","score_opus":0.06603053227389463,"score_gpt":0.4205393379276544,"score_spread":0.35450880565375975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220733525","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8337956,0.0013206232,6.081484e-7,0.033069473,0.0003969111,0.00048275772,0.00012726072,0.000051303767,0.13075547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99728715,0.00010559419,0.00007366304,0.0012314281,0.00060603104,0.00012954274,0.0000018501563,0.000011342748,0.000553409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807745,0.00021229201,0.00042402165,0.00022775782,0.0004551237,0.00060336274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984336,0.0007191952,0.00029707397,0.00018095752,0.00027147296,0.00009771624],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006103277,0.00018302025,0.00047704906,0.000087004475,0.0019777035,0.0000211949,0.00052470044,0.000043279408,0.00002891233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006796842,0.00013058745,0.00016323612,0.0005373744,0.0022049865,0.000104843726,0.00031140025,0.00024589765,0.000004940414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019407053,0.00007827944,0.08084296,0.00005281775,0.0002485649,0.0000031831187,0.102965236,0.0000037894965,0.000009479173,0.8113059,0.003807518,0.0006628774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005262342,0.00023462325,0.047672283,0.00003078527,0.00010877605,0.0000023529583,0.2789893,0.0000038906464,0.00010842962,0.025158832,0.64686155,0.00030296014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009310374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007926101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78614706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045810273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037305328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220943918","doi":"10.1108/s1059-43372022000087a002","title":"Gitxsan Legal Personhood: Gendered","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Indigenous; Perspective (graphical); Legal status; Sociology; Law; Political science; Gender studies; Art","score_opus":0.0645354439522897,"score_gpt":0.30436217583164554,"score_spread":0.23982673187935583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220943918","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000038500293,0.0011464095,0.0000023607283,0.0058995145,0.0008538556,0.00047129276,0.000051107072,0.00031764738,0.9912193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009835576,0.0010598174,0.0002115128,0.0005681264,0.0009823149,0.000031625135,0.000035859703,0.000046226683,0.98722893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975526,0.000072411065,0.0002696842,0.00050151336,0.0011124762,0.00049135013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992042,0.00010622368,0.00016718943,0.00021185025,0.00011619988,0.00019434502],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031643198,0.00034854337,0.0004349769,0.000059267288,0.0022482763,0.00015375676,0.0004969785,0.00030778136,0.07515083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008677325,0.00030099665,0.00037420646,0.000045798606,0.0004937774,0.00021968478,0.00030173405,0.00062103826,0.00066702307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052157015,0.000009988555,0.000012512384,0.0000096246695,0.00015819052,0.00002808255,0.01546817,6.28832e-7,0.0000024535352,0.9042845,0.07747464,0.0025460129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012264265,0.000028840901,0.000037116093,0.000009262902,0.000058863538,0.0000011720482,0.010926477,8.0301953e-7,9.377434e-7,0.002462149,0.9859103,0.00044141748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015415289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008785895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9084357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083257875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020314184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220979699","doi":"10.1017/s2045381721000265","title":"Ban on religious symbols in the public service: Quebec’s Bill 21 in a global pluralist perspective","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Constitutionalism","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Bill of rights; Political science; Charter; Human rights; Opposition (politics); Pluralism (philosophy); Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.033000358948725786,"score_gpt":0.33170281077739616,"score_spread":0.2987024518286704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220979699","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31936812,0.0016840257,0.000002512507,0.52168715,0.0010676783,0.001219535,0.00097039103,0.00012789825,0.15387268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909893,0.00005352415,0.000020671934,0.00844029,0.00016601298,0.0001962872,0.00004610391,0.0000027672525,0.00008503913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966166,0.00089120585,0.00029363588,0.0004343946,0.0011963346,0.00056782475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925905,0.00016305807,0.0001033366,0.00018690123,0.0001862112,0.000101446145],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000923727,0.00020379302,0.00023945708,0.000042582924,0.0016676318,0.0001999168,0.00072561606,0.00009463815,0.00019792966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067658286,0.00014273042,0.000112989306,0.0019459353,0.0009404738,0.0002536582,0.00023564808,0.00035807767,0.00006403105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028963268,0.00014078533,0.015304282,0.0000026627622,0.00002201987,0.00008726375,0.012874247,0.00020884896,8.0451804e-7,0.957113,0.014118012,0.000099061515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012142411,0.000046748202,0.13250163,0.00003594688,0.000019941901,0.00004259001,0.17621952,0.00001858735,2.7540895e-7,0.04920138,0.64025676,0.00044235133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5798392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59951997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90791166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008417378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010140196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220985550","doi":"10.36079/lamintang.ijlapp-0401.325","title":"Liberalism, Law and Social Rights: The Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the Era of Welfare State Restructuring","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law and Public Policy (IJLAPP)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Liberalism; Social equality; Political science; Social rights; Retrenchment; State (computer science); Welfare state; Law and economics; Sociology; Human rights; Politics; Public administration","score_opus":0.02286040960073012,"score_gpt":0.3108209797777214,"score_spread":0.2879605701769913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220985550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90222305,0.00036430603,8.1119236e-7,0.08972865,0.00020243402,0.00010150876,0.00007387799,0.000003342855,0.007302013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99814254,0.00007165601,0.000021533238,0.001232351,0.000473629,0.0000047334106,0.000001882342,0.0000033875624,0.00004831001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983248,0.00033759602,0.00036328108,0.00009300444,0.0007035473,0.00017773456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999138,0.00019431997,0.0003571845,0.000047847134,0.0002126797,0.00004997924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072274153,0.00009133586,0.00019221225,0.00006567258,0.0009445397,0.00015960463,0.0004376669,0.0000341765,0.000048556696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004216531,0.00004984737,0.00006377887,0.00010609962,0.001034888,0.00038446303,0.00016390716,0.00032354376,9.3006214e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041311134,0.000034944325,0.0007551763,0.0000059684157,0.00012388664,0.000008905378,0.09459952,0.0000037113798,0.000037360252,0.90350276,0.00027140527,0.00061506825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002119037,0.00016563348,0.04821339,0.000050525166,0.00004016797,0.00012917009,0.02031767,0.000022606595,0.000077031575,0.2573103,0.6713168,0.00023765983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.086458504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01242068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6710454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007901596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004492069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91962487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221036540","doi":"10.1108/s1059-43372022000087a005","title":"The Role of the Person in Modern Constitutional Law: How State-inflicted Harms Become Personal","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Scrutiny; Constitutional law; Supreme court; State (computer science); Subject (documents); Political science; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.03640781522578025,"score_gpt":0.2701107428268364,"score_spread":0.23370292760105615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221036540","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024523465,0.0021478122,0.0000015601325,0.013855032,0.0003913064,0.0007086316,0.00023717782,0.00004780944,0.9801583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5645597,0.00043605673,0.000015206134,0.00020250943,0.00012279628,0.000027104195,0.000012845117,0.000011901185,0.4346119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788016,0.00013031688,0.00021778709,0.00028213707,0.0011451446,0.00034442477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905455,0.00034169166,0.00022805625,0.00014374782,0.00016878375,0.00006314349],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044223762,0.00023737927,0.00030303773,0.000025765317,0.002314331,0.00010075138,0.000568419,0.00015530153,0.0014800698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000103681705,0.00012950257,0.00027404306,0.00006149966,0.0038975165,0.00014659675,0.0002346032,0.0006101884,0.000011140268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014221811,0.000012648788,0.0005528551,0.000005365905,0.00010117451,0.0000016468974,0.030587116,0.000017906266,0.000021157639,0.96686375,0.00069247134,0.0011296569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022012522,0.000016140655,0.0010394527,0.000030416992,0.000029200193,8.3947947e-7,0.025086382,0.00010832953,0.000008743894,0.014509918,0.95869595,0.00025451643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016266612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0398167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95800346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066807086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029570048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221065251","doi":"10.4324/9781315253770-18","title":"Some Confusions Concerning Collective Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05709575242918211,"score_gpt":0.309644867238126,"score_spread":0.2525491148089439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221065251","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000111576344,0.0012162665,0.0000011535849,0.002039473,0.0009567756,0.00070826506,0.000063855245,0.00023459923,0.994668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006172833,0.00072579924,0.000080313686,0.00038911123,0.00067933975,0.000057882207,0.00002324869,0.000023973404,0.9918475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805623,0.00009578355,0.00025487508,0.0004185517,0.00080214563,0.00037239847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889356,0.00042388067,0.00020898662,0.00013568962,0.00018348159,0.00015441167],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024704693,0.00028436712,0.00045672496,0.000058929832,0.00538286,0.00008133428,0.0003404467,0.0002723135,0.048120607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000095665746,0.0002288582,0.00023176867,0.00005586795,0.000773459,0.00018005863,0.0003124356,0.000586721,0.00042478408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004724169,0.0000067888195,0.0000073615697,0.000002874265,0.0001428867,0.000030108542,0.018586935,0.000001461764,0.0000016396716,0.9466261,0.034446966,0.00014214325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015694468,0.000037122267,0.000036823847,0.00002324308,0.000057306377,8.6364514e-7,0.0025962621,0.000001057785,0.0000017241558,0.056020994,0.940717,0.00035067266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017719792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010178061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015350389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036337154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225003157","doi":"10.3138/tjt-38.1.131","title":"Toronto School of Theology Theses Completed Academic Year 2020–2021","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033416938481724265,"score_gpt":0.335408199724015,"score_spread":0.3019912612422907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225003157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67553717,0.06204698,0.00013456504,0.015011228,0.005014508,0.0007654494,0.00006076306,0.00006293982,0.24136639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917767,0.0032116082,0.0003478473,0.00031005143,0.00082823075,0.000011877731,0.0000016211716,0.000013385621,0.0034986676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963581,0.0017412225,0.00067085953,0.0001856103,0.0005854832,0.00045875038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978091,0.00069430727,0.0008213041,0.00017072797,0.00032811568,0.00017642305],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018871765,0.0001672595,0.00063417264,0.000023817449,0.000650185,0.0000109174525,0.0010084033,0.000160267,0.056995418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012008016,0.00013138387,0.00025187113,0.0000848083,0.0008052366,0.00038169097,0.00041850403,0.0005309124,0.000026099227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002847601,0.00072780775,0.088493064,0.000057477497,0.0024826215,0.00017217844,0.22786652,0.00046498707,0.011280543,0.5494367,0.09877616,0.017394358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035821116,0.002643979,0.09342596,0.000065908054,0.00041605136,0.00021264814,0.35458735,0.000041188723,0.00022891634,0.033304367,0.51066166,0.0008298861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031059107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022410206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5161323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012824516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002333808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99542826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225873244","doi":"10.22215/etd/2021-14838","title":"Beyond Crown Sovereignty: A doctrinal analysis and critical comparison of Canadian and Anishinaabe political ontologies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Indigenous; Politics; Secularization; Treaty; Political science; Law; Political theology; Constitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.04150313236986807,"score_gpt":0.380434226042626,"score_spread":0.3389310936727579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225873244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.572817,0.0045630434,0.0000020875298,0.00444841,0.00022002324,0.00022543715,0.00009943958,0.000038644936,0.41758588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99523497,0.0004985718,0.0008066315,0.000092397975,0.000088842695,0.000012200314,0.00014129923,0.0000061595297,0.003118939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978682,0.00020263338,0.00038632433,0.0004256709,0.00047969577,0.00063748175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982144,0.0006340858,0.00009288896,0.00011165379,0.00043728697,0.0005096698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024771618,0.00023613461,0.000870929,0.00021859969,0.000820514,0.00026610552,0.00015493904,0.00045292178,0.0006725601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018355694,0.00020322899,0.00015793573,0.0007992793,0.0008463099,0.00015777994,0.000045256107,0.00031308204,0.0000015456405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022255168,0.00004745199,0.08203176,0.00013136749,0.000613437,0.000017418673,0.020924907,1.8216251e-7,0.000017761677,0.894295,0.0008744592,0.0010240274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001792984,0.00007774676,0.5551207,0.000054903903,0.0017393855,0.0000010789672,0.43127626,0.000023626942,0.00021738249,0.006839153,0.003997157,0.00047331754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84260267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9841173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8874558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022458151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043199156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8287438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229539739","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u5239","title":"Ferris, Rt Rev. Ronald Curry, (born 2 July 1945), Bishop of Algoma, 1996–2008; Assisting Bishop, Anglican Network in Canada, since 2009","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curry; Genealogy; Biology; History; Food science","score_opus":0.03357780247486521,"score_gpt":0.30053430019828403,"score_spread":0.26695649772341884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229539739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030834407,0.12080965,0.000027885237,0.006879465,0.0070517114,0.0031231134,0.002671233,0.00031915153,0.82828337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45988527,0.24452187,0.002464933,0.0032602493,0.024398556,0.00041030784,0.0017913082,0.0005281766,0.2627393],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99193335,0.0006966619,0.001545652,0.0011761207,0.0024491998,0.0021989937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99593055,0.001023986,0.0012874339,0.00058892963,0.0006122647,0.0005568464],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016831082,0.00091176643,0.0020315088,0.00021495904,0.0012993389,0.00017194459,0.0014474554,0.0009450796,0.00022641521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013884553,0.00083542656,0.00037733678,0.0019397724,0.0008245317,0.00028593047,0.00044027276,0.0018255846,0.000027151482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003871203,0.00008088815,0.053880863,0.00030503338,0.00022331167,0.000114608076,0.0033091477,0.00008311273,6.0152445e-7,0.00028615442,0.8910844,0.050593223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003821664,0.000038334612,0.1254143,0.00236234,0.00011742216,0.0000016992169,0.0021812872,0.00003090805,0.0000033215492,0.00007161862,0.8684752,0.0009214053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98047847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56554407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046617426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004396929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229767047","doi":"10.21991/c9p387","title":"McIvor v Canada and the 2010 Amendments to the Indian Act: A Half-Hearted Rememdy to Historical Injustice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Injustice; Fell; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Section (typography); Bill of rights; History; Geography; Human rights; Business; Philosophy; Cartography","score_opus":0.02528612958128768,"score_gpt":0.27514937967194986,"score_spread":0.24986325009066218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229767047","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09356176,0.0041655824,0.0076807076,0.8277357,0.019026084,0.005881353,0.00039752884,0.00027989247,0.041271374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98682743,0.00006642004,0.0004356011,0.0097440705,0.0006436943,0.0002868085,0.000014688985,0.0000076388915,0.0019736686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99666977,0.00026428263,0.00045671873,0.0003859914,0.0010223779,0.0012008464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978196,0.00063636655,0.00013862083,0.00030012763,0.00035147156,0.00075379136],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011151324,0.0003093447,0.00035406626,0.00007965565,0.006661458,0.00016313617,0.00052470976,0.00014521116,0.00013190016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030468297,0.00019172553,0.00011590633,0.00060509937,0.004239328,0.0005043606,0.0003690235,0.00039131494,0.00018124926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009685425,0.000052068408,0.012688148,0.000007144879,0.000088246954,0.0000049531527,0.006719817,0.00008496262,0.000026174035,0.83947414,0.14011167,0.00064585387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085971376,0.000022036467,0.0051447735,0.000046528334,0.00008612353,0.00003097473,0.016919509,0.000012783464,0.000015035817,0.00048058564,0.9760357,0.0003461951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.632917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8069769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89326566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025996997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019672997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99847054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229823347","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u160364","title":"Tonks, Rt. Rev. Basil, (born 28 April 1930), a Suffragan Bishop of Toronto (Credit Valley), since 1981","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Economic history; Demography; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.03622941364177408,"score_gpt":0.31629087763160685,"score_spread":0.2800614639898328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229823347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046576173,0.084048346,0.000028284672,0.0033715062,0.0052118124,0.001662985,0.0005671278,0.00035664448,0.9000957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014969904,0.38184446,0.0010853304,0.0007426982,0.012264516,0.00014167686,0.00037356358,0.00019250251,0.58838534],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99244916,0.0005963867,0.0013115217,0.0012656754,0.0026924522,0.0016847824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958057,0.00069991674,0.0010455732,0.00086709205,0.0009825557,0.00059918815],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015609039,0.000985515,0.0020832191,0.00010694565,0.0013920951,0.00025132005,0.0017827944,0.0017139855,0.0014131488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017557695,0.00083919475,0.00074492366,0.00054830714,0.0013722543,0.0006245086,0.000629136,0.0011559626,0.0001567969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086908425,0.00022270669,0.0014324831,0.0007330567,0.00043728494,0.000053686203,0.032138113,0.0000024570327,0.000008165079,0.00440932,0.91398937,0.046486452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053248863,0.00012935186,0.00423245,0.0015764635,0.00022968017,0.0000020628577,0.008372245,0.000005390003,0.000041447354,0.0001577764,0.983715,0.001005667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.247388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2095816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31171033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025770208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009849854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229841189","doi":"10.3138/flor.20.041","title":"<i>B. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada</i>","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Florilegium","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Section (typography); Field (mathematics); Library science; Database; Computer science; Humanities; Art; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2921218533633471,"score_gpt":0.37864893295295615,"score_spread":0.08652707958960904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229841189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09131601,0.0012795643,0.000003962864,0.004004894,0.007471997,0.00028818802,0.000015687407,0.000034353863,0.89558536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850284,0.00006824628,0.00017721081,0.000145008,0.0034260438,0.000016423512,2.743843e-7,0.000005625866,0.011132753],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965949,0.00034363216,0.0001407691,0.000186791,0.0022540132,0.00047987193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985452,0.00029100364,0.00005096208,0.00005144193,0.0010108321,0.00005050247],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036629804,0.00007855471,0.00015735257,0.000022982886,0.003614431,0.00008014927,0.00018286987,0.00005449389,0.000096515025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019145274,0.00006629246,0.000025125793,0.00032809254,0.0024009717,0.00016432183,0.000051029507,0.00013814047,0.0000025221032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036954425,0.000012266921,0.0012964199,0.000017148943,0.000012970729,0.0000018106496,0.055592168,0.0000013050417,0.0000148368645,0.421556,0.5214675,0.000023865257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009278845,0.000023136825,0.0012355066,0.000006995169,0.0000039065153,2.2662053e-7,0.045562737,0.0000015642852,0.000029903465,0.0020008904,0.9509563,0.00008606427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68465227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88232213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8937124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011651745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048611723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99768275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229879975","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u162704","title":"Carney, Rt. Rev James F., (28 June 1915–16 Sept. 1990), Archbishop of Vancouver (RC), since 1969","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Archbishop; Archaeology; Art; Geology; History; Art history; Classics","score_opus":0.032960474191073626,"score_gpt":0.3154226209091623,"score_spread":0.28246214671808867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229879975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003834532,0.041019585,0.000030410292,0.002754117,0.008432211,0.0015415511,0.00061780657,0.00030796014,0.9414618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019416383,0.13395661,0.00055651733,0.0006171898,0.0051136254,0.00009135885,0.00021007059,0.00013026567,0.839908],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99276346,0.00057877466,0.0012202574,0.0012058498,0.0025530516,0.0016785932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959058,0.00090144534,0.0010712357,0.0007628298,0.0008456772,0.0005129804],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012944347,0.00095595623,0.0020721524,0.00024706274,0.00129436,0.00017759424,0.0014831302,0.0014036185,0.0007795088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013779516,0.00079063163,0.00076760864,0.0009961791,0.0021182357,0.00039446366,0.00060710177,0.001570167,0.0001791288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039745555,0.000106663465,0.0012171839,0.00059032586,0.00039981183,0.000030859374,0.01723546,0.000004382204,0.000003070159,0.0018315115,0.9545345,0.024006495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046969182,0.00006896881,0.0010297402,0.0016091111,0.00029106368,0.0000012457152,0.010017141,0.000002891732,0.000059007274,0.00043938885,0.98504317,0.0009685997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06574495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14723891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10155386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014960477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007425585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230101388","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.37888","title":"Finlay, Most Rev. Terence Edward, (19 May 1937–20 March 2017), Archbishop of Toronto and Metropolitan of the Ecclesiastical Province of Ontario, 2000–04","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Archbishop; Metropolitan area; History; Genealogy; Geography; Art; Archaeology; Classics","score_opus":0.03900140191447168,"score_gpt":0.3241815396975755,"score_spread":0.28518013778310386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230101388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06830698,0.030163575,0.000026590016,0.0021491584,0.001253369,0.0025203184,0.0013099121,0.000048614882,0.8942215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36497772,0.058030955,0.002195011,0.00022037418,0.0014433468,0.000084337466,0.00010224864,0.00009834042,0.57284766],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99519324,0.0004938513,0.001031825,0.0006751833,0.001745273,0.0008606084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996862,0.0007939241,0.00085226895,0.00061382586,0.00057172397,0.0003062659],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010900144,0.0005044058,0.0014275264,0.000063441454,0.00052741606,0.00005430654,0.0012471828,0.0006558815,0.0005315674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013252083,0.0003436196,0.0003081624,0.00027402042,0.0032847025,0.00022351282,0.00075960875,0.0007834207,0.0000052732357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055863056,0.0008075233,0.12401494,0.0052652005,0.001430213,0.000045615114,0.10862078,0.000005468776,0.00013836483,0.03888138,0.67839634,0.041835573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007476281,0.00040463154,0.14476542,0.0033877536,0.00047087087,0.000005418292,0.01567435,0.000006481257,0.00020918991,0.0006668802,0.8327415,0.0009198571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74913394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81812215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32137382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003828807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032583815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230704630","doi":"10.3138/9781442624986-004","title":"1.Indigenous Peoples And The Ethos Of Legal Pluralism In Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Indigenous; Pluralism (philosophy); Legal pluralism; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Ecology; Legal realism; Comparative law; Biology","score_opus":0.017509464751021227,"score_gpt":0.2197285266060888,"score_spread":0.20221906185506758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230704630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040867897,0.0042558163,0.0000011901212,0.00028632308,0.00011954489,0.0005045805,0.00010051634,0.000009608472,0.99063563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08932248,0.005003553,0.00004754186,0.000019972613,0.000062354404,4.8553477e-7,0.0000012901821,0.000009456989,0.9055329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900436,0.0001024507,0.00015201788,0.00017612404,0.00037013882,0.00019492215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990529,0.00035060788,0.00026630133,0.00013903475,0.00012904832,0.00006210129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018547584,0.0001500874,0.00041371514,0.000008144799,0.00032710374,0.000008944198,0.00038665452,0.00014407889,0.00010209906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035651563,0.00010888261,0.000089461966,8.797996e-7,0.0011017278,0.00008758383,0.00019889316,0.00011279483,3.011692e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017225876,0.000004588907,0.00013673684,0.000073377996,0.00021450024,0.000023314682,0.41002136,9.3686384e-7,0.000007747574,0.5819241,0.001011907,0.0064091817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009794834,0.00001544704,0.0009700391,0.0002203311,0.00009789823,3.849973e-7,0.014702581,6.9575657e-7,0.0000120133045,0.0002591065,0.98251873,0.0002232844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99975795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9815068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010436731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070570526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4440104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231351003","doi":"10.3138/9781442693852","title":"Viscount Haldane","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Hegelianism; Sociology","score_opus":0.024114828759790312,"score_gpt":0.25234503822027415,"score_spread":0.22823020946048383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231351003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005411584,0.0015597986,0.000007782284,0.000099328216,0.0004545618,0.00041466145,0.00006720249,0.0000940146,0.99724853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00035218828,0.0010772984,0.00041018284,0.000018553801,0.00035320767,3.9534848e-7,0.000011457003,0.000014571613,0.99776214],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985912,0.00008939571,0.00013688355,0.00030821393,0.0005686329,0.0003056671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989096,0.00010283352,0.00028569732,0.0002629851,0.00028713368,0.00015176795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019885345,0.0002227149,0.00041873506,0.000009762401,0.00076160615,0.000031613774,0.00073934253,0.0005881309,0.0008448648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040042414,0.0002410625,0.00022983144,0.0000011465878,0.0011907722,0.00016485192,0.0002990241,0.0003342243,0.000019588353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011279726,0.00007001862,0.000017051578,0.00022495959,0.00066198746,0.0000664465,0.30296218,0.0000017087018,0.00017032948,0.3035318,0.3762126,0.015968122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022100168,0.000024015866,0.000057028537,0.00007526872,0.00012953702,1.952786e-7,0.0014720963,0.0000011138532,0.000016555703,0.00016463985,0.9975726,0.0002659736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7009174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6173452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62135994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001019352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030967232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98302436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232151085","doi":"10.1086/ahr/109.2.508","title":"Patrick Brode. <i>Courted and Abandoned: Seduction in Canadian Law</i>. Buffalo, N.Y.: University of Toronto Press, for The Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History, Toronto. 2002. Pp. xi, 252. $45.00","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Historical Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Law; History; Legal history; Political science","score_opus":0.024827916674964152,"score_gpt":0.2644130623392197,"score_spread":0.23958514566425554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232151085","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005028958,0.9678184,0.000058062757,0.019011574,0.0005173817,0.00236487,0.00009171586,0.000033078548,0.0096020335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13815673,0.8537407,0.0009014206,0.0027628327,0.0005030085,0.00013308473,0.000013759669,0.00003572443,0.0037527506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830633,0.00017418756,0.00028340198,0.00032499965,0.00027734367,0.00063370826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984791,0.00029691373,0.00028469294,0.00026141343,0.00026291393,0.00041492272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009160205,0.00019934287,0.0005525115,0.0000062333743,0.0012280499,0.000017062694,0.00045971043,0.00007438056,0.00010993134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037839662,0.00014242253,0.0002966722,0.00014321976,0.00077925826,0.00028130255,0.000032123186,0.00014814628,0.0000025454162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005476922,0.000054362823,0.00013614687,0.0002578343,0.00016103238,0.0000019846375,0.017196698,0.000012556601,0.00001172081,0.01911321,0.9448595,0.018140182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033443022,0.00007543018,0.0006840536,0.00009367622,0.00022427629,0.0000010800513,0.0028245593,0.000011985715,3.979978e-7,0.00003528084,0.995523,0.00019183132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13765384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03224596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013022968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9714691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232932179","doi":"10.1093/he/9780191897689.003.0062","title":"Re Amendment to the Constitution of Canada [1981] 1 SCR 753, also known as the Patriation Reference, Supreme Court of Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.037534178721235954,"score_gpt":0.23384434639923152,"score_spread":0.19631016767799556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232932179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00063554145,0.00008255902,0.000009211845,0.0062813465,0.0003086073,0.0009167167,0.0005042083,0.000016417178,0.9912454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39017588,0.00032539177,0.00003649952,0.00033418852,0.0001471945,0.0000028726067,0.00002925809,0.000009733194,0.608939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981539,0.00012925021,0.0002465461,0.00025650617,0.00095912605,0.00025466114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985785,0.00019157815,0.0004148032,0.00023673144,0.00043200812,0.00014637473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023398148,0.00020833287,0.00034100952,0.00002263509,0.0011134931,0.000022359525,0.00064741244,0.00014418793,0.000067099296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010660325,0.00014798064,0.00008583981,0.000028123968,0.00046230023,0.000052277155,0.00027498926,0.00026996012,2.6302163e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009107437,0.0000044079243,0.00001876593,0.000039074468,0.00024686614,0.000012381535,0.007744367,0.00010735842,0.000013058278,0.92271435,0.068430506,0.00057779957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001584949,0.000032563894,0.000057784255,0.00008221107,0.00013793494,1.3150864e-7,0.008111022,0.0000064250453,0.00007438612,0.00013531002,0.9910341,0.00016961721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9889227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9226036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014214858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034516542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8564201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232970557","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u212607","title":"Latchford, Hon. Francis Robert, (30 April 1854–13 Aug. 1938), Chief Justice in Appeal, Supreme Court of Ontario, since 1923","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Political science","score_opus":0.030163957198578513,"score_gpt":0.2960868427556575,"score_spread":0.265922885557079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232970557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051309943,0.026682291,0.00011954169,0.002590609,0.0058893906,0.0026479024,0.0005318115,0.0002981959,0.9099303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07876919,0.11303406,0.0016301285,0.0013752698,0.0075146626,0.00022934022,0.0006194362,0.00028690448,0.796541],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929923,0.00038858192,0.001389208,0.0011582818,0.002292271,0.0017793537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99673,0.000670736,0.0009002804,0.0006552451,0.0005879832,0.00045572827],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015090943,0.00094472384,0.002071106,0.00027440602,0.0011735039,0.000202141,0.0014704093,0.0015593703,0.001490781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008752174,0.0008416806,0.000508909,0.00094185513,0.0014879886,0.0004420892,0.00050870754,0.0020826668,0.0002694401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020535232,0.00067430106,0.03277606,0.0020969126,0.00070190954,0.00014652933,0.18039258,0.00013951579,0.0000065324216,0.004731659,0.7490865,0.029042128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010358122,0.00009359803,0.031098155,0.0016357827,0.00032190135,0.0000017796826,0.005548604,0.000024490648,0.000010531495,0.00021211004,0.95897025,0.001046997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6900624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8674022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2098837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034130728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001660046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233503657","doi":"10.5040/9781472562654.ch-009","title":"Charting the Impact of Rights and Equality Discourse on Canadian Family Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.06121156496620136,"score_gpt":0.32590311878658684,"score_spread":0.2646915538203855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233503657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006629343,0.00015237751,0.0000012178252,0.0023039887,0.00027609256,0.00043897989,0.0001339351,0.000055978508,0.9900081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8086549,0.000007727675,0.000012886867,0.00072270323,0.00077760266,0.000012162718,0.000015398879,0.00002599968,0.18977061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787104,0.00019074487,0.00036726284,0.00037101223,0.0006511633,0.0005487738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981824,0.00047296536,0.0003992898,0.00031507082,0.00025590844,0.0003743349],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001830427,0.00032039927,0.00046231246,0.00006932144,0.0020778133,0.0012517299,0.00053013896,0.00037635112,0.00007929869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040767057,0.00018760681,0.0002521538,0.000020328787,0.0013369705,0.00037787834,0.000121522135,0.0006659241,0.00002030638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005419783,0.0000029457588,0.000035847002,0.000011792562,0.00011344136,0.000002498617,0.015559005,0.0000010780104,0.000009274996,0.96551406,0.015895054,0.0028495996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015109843,0.000058675647,0.0010490246,0.0003114335,0.0000618114,4.580715e-7,0.0011176162,0.000007025354,0.000007665573,0.024411986,0.9723971,0.0004261206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8932952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77704906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.956502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005111842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026457538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233637514","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u45474","title":"Pitman, Rt Rev. Cyrus Clement James, (born 24 March 1944), Bishop of Newfoundland, Eastern, and Labrador, 2004–13","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; Cartography; History; Art; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04331540082316055,"score_gpt":0.32216881458912994,"score_spread":0.2788534137659694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233637514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09762499,0.11647774,0.000045433746,0.012456256,0.006100883,0.0041620736,0.0013587403,0.00034597595,0.7614279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02982435,0.30239898,0.00047266876,0.0007837644,0.0047151498,0.00012409862,0.00034812122,0.00012677451,0.6612061],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946056,0.0004328009,0.0009707961,0.0009305903,0.0018399844,0.0012202307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754006,0.00039878752,0.00067159365,0.00048807947,0.00046962488,0.00043184575],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001196928,0.000687418,0.0014273371,0.00021397926,0.0009624406,0.00027933935,0.0008326253,0.0008444587,0.00078772946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034206396,0.0005676102,0.0003058604,0.0005766114,0.0011214362,0.0002752593,0.00056797126,0.00095978164,0.00012944161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013800742,0.00020985788,0.06437731,0.0011603994,0.00071196625,0.000059486807,0.026941735,0.0000014836419,0.0000027062622,0.0016638825,0.7198855,0.18484767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076567696,0.00012282927,0.027105553,0.0011553029,0.00018666101,0.0000023322082,0.0058936155,0.000004923159,0.0000038219996,0.00021884912,0.9638739,0.00066650636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14550442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14294149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24398842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008773537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037372837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233675511","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.16928","title":"Genge, Rt Rev. Mark, (born 18 March 1927), Bishop of Central Newfoundland, 1976–90; Pastoral Associate, St John’s, Yorkmills, Ontario, 1990–92","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Genealogy; Archaeology; History","score_opus":0.0490902394714549,"score_gpt":0.3100492783384014,"score_spread":0.2609590388669465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233675511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040963564,0.019091632,0.000015350202,0.0024302534,0.009238745,0.0029529855,0.0029093656,0.00035280673,0.9220453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034938116,0.103539124,0.0007559531,0.0007970452,0.009318554,0.00016463544,0.0020286005,0.00024560944,0.84821236],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896169,0.0009782031,0.0016042704,0.001453213,0.0033149528,0.003032461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953165,0.000749028,0.0014252233,0.00076024834,0.0008885963,0.0008604005],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020181946,0.0012536524,0.0025710803,0.00032664603,0.0018956001,0.0004502775,0.0018058186,0.0019424009,0.0036863713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084423,0.0011064274,0.0010457763,0.001084892,0.0013202118,0.0004675829,0.0007143604,0.002678178,0.0001865863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015058396,0.00027780433,0.117611036,0.00036459405,0.0009898095,0.00006867003,0.017027399,0.00000291218,0.0000013280156,0.00049337256,0.8453198,0.01769267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000884822,0.00011861175,0.17285709,0.00092414,0.000337901,0.0000022066563,0.0024865225,0.0000017405205,0.000001995271,0.00012982027,0.8211722,0.0010829865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7144791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90689933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19242026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008492746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002187098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234266756","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u31567","title":"Pryce, Rt Rev. (James) Taylor, (3 May 1936–1 Aug. 2010), a Suffragan Bishop of Toronto (Area Bishop of York-Simcoe), 1985–2000","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.04879735512824983,"score_gpt":0.31972396801136066,"score_spread":0.2709266128831108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234266756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015227041,0.08041956,0.00001824719,0.0019712932,0.004703886,0.002625675,0.0014370007,0.00032459208,0.8932727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061219204,0.24511583,0.00074576103,0.0005380628,0.0043305377,0.0002078378,0.0006024191,0.00024861415,0.68699175],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912728,0.00065224594,0.0019473968,0.001356747,0.0029169337,0.0018538956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99446285,0.00084256654,0.0017806516,0.0011019473,0.001173951,0.00063804607],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018183019,0.001199112,0.0028978747,0.0002294522,0.0010376992,0.00018856516,0.002025566,0.0020760973,0.0028725185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012379901,0.0010014403,0.0010223263,0.0009622954,0.0020648697,0.00060268526,0.0006027117,0.0012230846,0.00010868316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014970229,0.00032221875,0.0052062417,0.0011232827,0.0008482117,0.00003128513,0.06753974,0.000005221368,0.000015530788,0.0016594805,0.8817105,0.041388582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007654052,0.00019854752,0.0045466605,0.0020276317,0.00037395413,0.0000029180076,0.012566372,0.000010933119,0.00011035194,0.000104572064,0.9781086,0.0011840942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30944595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14004946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20628096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002253383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011205084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234567322","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100008929","title":"Profane Matrimony","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.017261520959388828,"score_gpt":0.2631867218158972,"score_spread":0.24592520085650837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234567322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7779909,0.04925481,0.000029782477,0.06897396,0.005292936,0.0005112698,0.00030044102,0.000023673352,0.09762224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9451874,0.0024696551,0.0008915612,0.003620985,0.00296989,0.000007829731,0.000014187267,0.00005172988,0.04478679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965983,0.0002976662,0.0008745546,0.00037925824,0.00025580716,0.0015944121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959828,0.00030105276,0.0006714583,0.00018793199,0.0007259542,0.0021307638],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016188141,0.0004158778,0.00084724923,0.000057397472,0.0021000127,0.00031398935,0.00047406738,0.00057958864,0.00042972527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018557612,0.0004427241,0.0007734747,0.00043598434,0.0027562042,0.0007463086,0.000037833208,0.0009772617,0.000017470013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000477484,0.000032368313,0.0010537095,0.00020446094,0.00031443444,0.00028790062,0.093181826,0.00003933356,0.000029920553,0.8674813,0.034525186,0.0028447825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087093987,0.00016499354,0.0044204476,0.00039549748,0.00035178967,0.00023692945,0.058777418,0.00003578098,0.000012733475,0.020593194,0.9134831,0.0006572068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8119229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9509596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87895787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00342042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018547303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234707460","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.29380","title":"Marsh, Rt Rev. Edward Frank, (born 25 Oct. 1935), Bishop of Central Newfoundland, 1990–2000; Diocesan Administrator, Diocese of Central Newfoundland, 2005","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marsh; Genealogy; History; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.028819901419771622,"score_gpt":0.3073402237148953,"score_spread":0.27852032229512363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234707460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22025272,0.06834352,0.00009956568,0.0037965416,0.012737242,0.004935484,0.0060281297,0.00056132773,0.6832455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5023053,0.26083118,0.0007478172,0.0005128482,0.012492745,0.000120346485,0.0015806191,0.0003098096,0.22109929],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887787,0.00072319165,0.002228334,0.0014982462,0.003325201,0.0034463364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99430585,0.0007115631,0.0018840823,0.0009662996,0.0007998901,0.001332317],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012709294,0.0014384451,0.0030845914,0.00036057673,0.0011680096,0.00034331478,0.0020906923,0.0020064944,0.0019446239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094590074,0.0012296323,0.0012469554,0.0012700165,0.002414975,0.0006358819,0.00043114563,0.0017433787,0.00010152015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010986474,0.0011704114,0.47870508,0.004052866,0.0024823889,0.0002462384,0.041075394,0.000018659313,0.000023726345,0.0049603656,0.42925936,0.036906853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018906437,0.00025725842,0.08768232,0.0018540994,0.00056895096,0.0000068710056,0.0038099329,0.000006243283,0.000030303272,0.00013035633,0.9024126,0.0013504208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11682065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24731672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47315323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025806357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027120702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234753337","doi":"10.24124/2012/bpgub806","title":"Human Rights and the Duty to Accommodate in Employment: Stakeholders' Knowledge and Attitudes.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Likert scale; Duty; Psychology; Scale (ratio); Educational attainment; Social psychology; Political science; Developmental psychology; Geography; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.08172978184557138,"score_gpt":0.37784873544702535,"score_spread":0.29611895360145396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234753337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8665384,0.0028430335,2.5309876e-7,0.0008197543,0.00030279614,0.0010224992,0.000005447207,0.000046214027,0.12842157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93726254,0.00010975617,0.000027059757,0.00005558528,0.00018301506,0.00010569541,0.000027706099,0.0000109511075,0.062217716],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985963,0.00023384817,0.00024382249,0.00029322185,0.00026137746,0.00037141913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994116,0.00015520735,0.000087173634,0.000118470714,0.000086260115,0.00014130445],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006959635,0.00022917305,0.0003674104,0.000056434368,0.0015939123,0.00016627343,0.00022589495,0.00019542263,0.00018428643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053700478,0.00013153131,0.000049553597,0.00016027984,0.0003180398,0.00020601272,0.00009356127,0.00024017939,0.000034278215],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000929277,0.0001670537,0.021575075,0.00015727589,0.00021723683,0.0000024795556,0.8087895,5.434242e-7,0.00006123704,0.15175556,0.011846302,0.0053348346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012823441,0.000022780652,0.81169266,0.00015768807,0.00009256037,1.6449437e-7,0.025216265,9.844532e-7,0.000034023,0.001740564,0.15924901,0.000510941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09898515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7786152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7901176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018032332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026066211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234917865","doi":"10.21991/cf29370","title":"Wahkohtowin in Action","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Indigenous; Law; Commission; Action (physics); Political science; Work (physics); Sociology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.03714303502622718,"score_gpt":0.318395759727178,"score_spread":0.2812527247009508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234917865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3770074,0.0012824661,0.0044143302,0.032983974,0.007635642,0.002486265,0.00012281704,0.00056203775,0.57350504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948071,0.0001877471,0.00045960833,0.0007995963,0.00020870674,0.000089626155,0.000045535355,0.000007605344,0.003394458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971631,0.00015741424,0.0004958899,0.00052491017,0.0007233517,0.0009353434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891293,0.00023426233,0.00014742877,0.00022918754,0.00026718935,0.0002090294],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056825945,0.000281052,0.0003641844,0.00020596354,0.0016051535,0.0001230707,0.00035236526,0.0002811687,0.0012039664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061420887,0.00026835303,0.00020426091,0.00062340085,0.0044284677,0.0012164037,0.00014131672,0.00038289785,0.0018380092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032479897,0.0000788189,0.12668124,0.000011866836,0.00003148288,0.000009386367,0.000609548,0.00049329305,0.00023145894,0.8685265,0.0022404313,0.0010535099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022221892,0.000049543098,0.01745468,0.00020766219,0.00002985067,0.0000275326,0.027501076,0.00027752182,0.00018890311,0.014605751,0.93665355,0.00078174385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030616634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006773311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93441314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010861438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010991998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234956907","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.43470","title":"Elliott, Rt Rev. (Matthew) George (Holden), (born 17 Feb. 1949), a Suffragan Bishop of Toronto (Area Bishop of York-Simcoe), 2001–13","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Art; Art history","score_opus":0.05252377553674156,"score_gpt":0.3231119310558,"score_spread":0.27058815551905846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234956907","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026903214,0.060884483,0.000025860092,0.0014746257,0.0031555973,0.0024180673,0.001775149,0.00033183632,0.9030312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037846927,0.28587002,0.0005191201,0.0005425272,0.003915129,0.00015925507,0.0005558313,0.00023706304,0.6703541],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909983,0.0006631919,0.0019747973,0.0013527154,0.0029134043,0.002097535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99407315,0.000982171,0.0018905913,0.0011443702,0.0012256503,0.0006840782],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022690878,0.0012209677,0.0029619255,0.00023120787,0.0010780629,0.00021117787,0.0021767076,0.0020645733,0.0044409945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011816568,0.0010362038,0.0010863665,0.0009480042,0.0018035771,0.00056893117,0.00063151435,0.0012460898,0.00010222308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106416184,0.00039261277,0.0043416643,0.00093885744,0.0007456686,0.00003320126,0.032174543,0.000005130259,0.000030730724,0.0010484407,0.9462161,0.013966605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007568318,0.00017445015,0.007369254,0.0024098447,0.00040604788,0.0000032327878,0.011023733,0.000008672678,0.00011649639,0.00012647068,0.9764036,0.0012013735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29061645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26641193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23267704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018029899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008532737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235236168","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u33891","title":"Morgan, Most Rev. Thomas Oliver, (born 20 Jan. 1941), Archbishop of Saskatoon and Metropolitan of the Ecclesiastical Province of Rupert’s Land, 2000–03; Interim Rector and Dean, St John’s Cathedral, Saskatoon, 2006–07 and 2011–12","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Archbishop; Metropolitan area; Interim; Art history; Art; History; Archaeology; Classics","score_opus":0.030488918802679517,"score_gpt":0.2942868236882268,"score_spread":0.2637979048855473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235236168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82033336,0.07139639,0.000024633027,0.0026034913,0.0009688208,0.0031543083,0.0047135977,0.00009433558,0.096711084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75819165,0.11062409,0.0012869628,0.00036402594,0.0013137568,0.00007273974,0.00014608387,0.00020405621,0.12779666],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955604,0.00064696337,0.001085172,0.00078332884,0.0011240479,0.0008000658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99682844,0.00079867267,0.0009003159,0.00048183103,0.0005889803,0.00040175326],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010305437,0.0006456305,0.0016721813,0.00017306149,0.0005706042,0.00010531913,0.0006738058,0.0006819903,0.00016273021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011174837,0.0004291938,0.00019427449,0.00034821779,0.0042813825,0.0002939826,0.0007059667,0.0007529866,0.000004544428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009077038,0.0011041169,0.29624504,0.005776392,0.0020660348,0.000070571274,0.06400386,0.0000017342127,0.0003471675,0.005380707,0.5962018,0.02789492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032521337,0.0013798323,0.33178735,0.0059149577,0.0014653371,0.00004117248,0.03677753,0.00003827799,0.00092879264,0.00050649606,0.6157722,0.0021359478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047236893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14462762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097390726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058733736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084760226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235424127","doi":"10.5040/9781509947201.ch-002","title":"The Making of the Canadian Constitution","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05389451511250016,"score_gpt":0.30334208850455224,"score_spread":0.2494475733920521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235424127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001084401,0.0011177681,8.039679e-7,0.01628452,0.0006997992,0.00022675749,0.000010154355,0.000011624206,0.9816377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19501211,0.00021913409,0.000023702081,0.0003995655,0.00019276264,0.0000033551792,0.0000012988304,0.0000038619105,0.8041442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991458,0.000044796663,0.00014225692,0.00011304643,0.000364358,0.00018973259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999401,0.00009140294,0.00011469055,0.00013716977,0.00022311155,0.000032642885],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002673502,0.00009499069,0.0001283096,0.000009642328,0.0032854246,0.00008705365,0.00028086823,0.0001764599,0.0005161446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002452393,0.00004577189,0.00013333562,0.00003132098,0.00159525,0.000029208468,0.000073533156,0.0001976431,0.000023680805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.6309138e-7,4.1442414e-7,0.000074402866,0.0000024937349,0.000035506986,0.0000010428846,0.002049044,5.261543e-7,6.0898026e-7,0.9891832,0.00743397,0.0012185469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017681989,0.0000012026513,0.0002466028,0.0000678062,0.000022652755,2.581255e-7,0.002212856,3.8861563e-7,0.0000025543884,0.0026490034,0.99470574,0.00007323137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5262933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99453676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9872718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005664113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009087284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235596555","doi":"10.1080/14490854.2015.11668592","title":"Newfoundland","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History Australia","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lakehead University","keywords":"Thunder; Tourism; Recreation; Media studies; Art; Geography; Art history; Sociology; Political science; Archaeology; Law; Meteorology","score_opus":0.21723605521895084,"score_gpt":0.3636417589542197,"score_spread":0.14640570373526884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235596555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51279813,0.0017000615,0.000015971842,0.0037923313,0.0063175033,0.0003412272,0.000003866831,0.00034070207,0.47469023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73804045,0.00001128395,0.00026128828,0.00013072463,0.00049704826,0.000008928758,0.0000017680798,0.0000047730837,0.26104373],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990701,0.00010395961,0.00010161778,0.00013969452,0.00032968825,0.00025492976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995036,0.000022606546,0.000046516503,0.00008965023,0.000106459534,0.00023115502],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032898807,0.00008018267,0.00010929609,0.00001764086,0.00024179647,0.000019703195,0.00015453696,0.00007631307,0.0010777804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002081763,0.00007113421,0.000047503556,0.00006425693,0.00040437438,0.0001887695,0.000022188204,0.00009731494,0.0011591974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008705439,0.000025616038,0.015674084,0.0000037282314,0.00001541587,0.000010963617,0.06895568,0.0000040786244,0.000045127646,0.019747164,0.8953089,0.00020053862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001641205,0.00001474525,0.010391233,0.0000033551996,0.00000964223,3.8465254e-7,0.0033604673,4.822694e-7,0.0000018177766,0.00027147506,0.9856709,0.00011132931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048506446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0241542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22524235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021808925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000115823976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235603964","doi":"10.1093/9780198727255.003.0039","title":"Canada—Saskatchewan","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Charter; Legislation; Law; Scope (computer science); Politics; Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Public administration","score_opus":0.055230095428009336,"score_gpt":0.29251150889297994,"score_spread":0.23728141346497061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235603964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009094446,0.0009531147,0.0000013549676,0.0074695554,0.00061381346,0.00024054741,0.00003902399,0.00009251851,0.990581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005614711,0.000113546805,0.000113416456,0.0005876146,0.00082444126,0.0000049591613,0.0000124914395,0.00002085478,0.99270797],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823767,0.000023939394,0.00018749476,0.000251977,0.0009724826,0.00032642027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906695,0.000071276365,0.00010695049,0.00014240053,0.00034034034,0.00027208735],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024290814,0.00022707654,0.0003167561,0.000015244636,0.0005099228,0.000046862602,0.00029596488,0.00027728238,0.0042381706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000098182405,0.00017706989,0.00008477616,0.000019041272,0.0003076756,0.000060473172,0.00009748483,0.0002516099,0.00026373105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012936828,0.0000016215213,0.000008773053,0.0000042165866,0.00005395692,0.00001149055,0.004818837,3.275504e-7,1.9817006e-7,0.23719506,0.75571555,0.0021887023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057075373,0.000006096218,0.000017518392,0.000017188158,0.000025545562,1.8242098e-7,0.0065191416,1.7631588e-7,6.180882e-7,0.0049745617,0.9881058,0.00027609643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9937119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23239027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016069459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003608062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235941287","doi":"10.4324/9781315229829-33","title":"Assisting Suicide: An Analysis of the Legal (i.e., Moral) Arguments in Judgments of the Supreme Court of Canada in the Sue Rodriguez Case","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.06007600749323869,"score_gpt":0.30220202347659575,"score_spread":0.24212601598335706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235941287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66517484,0.00029306085,0.000001224362,0.00971921,0.00042598153,0.0017189601,0.00040731422,0.000013524171,0.32224587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98216456,0.000025936375,0.000023941831,0.00025258504,0.00004382894,0.000010065103,0.00000931343,0.000011990781,0.017457806],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965466,0.00043074743,0.00085969805,0.0003335109,0.0015074249,0.00032196892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981397,0.0003422088,0.0007864834,0.00043483652,0.00023155005,0.000065233246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010470029,0.0002742339,0.0007977629,0.000076431985,0.0004065522,0.000030969586,0.0010759896,0.00016735954,0.00019596762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042642356,0.00013538329,0.00032985344,0.0005986555,0.00058146834,0.00011799616,0.0002804532,0.0004378543,3.2722434e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008899908,0.00034416644,0.7462666,0.00025062592,0.00434717,0.00037326396,0.09508418,0.0030532542,0.00019665537,0.14382635,0.005271391,0.0008973138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017818155,0.0001809889,0.8377156,0.0009764302,0.005115803,0.000010399546,0.12950252,0.0019293008,0.0006787542,0.0020705538,0.01838948,0.0016483415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9692605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99711514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31698966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006466634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005389091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55207705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236603093","doi":"10.1093/icon/mor073","title":"10 x 10","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Harassment; Law; Pornography; Verdict; Political science; Sociology; Human rights; Criminology","score_opus":0.03962335443621007,"score_gpt":0.35380493360002174,"score_spread":0.3141815791638117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236603093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0123066455,0.0013141267,0.0004825812,0.011692328,0.00418971,0.000087682056,0.000027894124,0.000027754697,0.9698713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854788,0.000058497448,0.0008638997,0.00043845153,0.0032854155,0.0000019694546,0.0000039871893,0.000002604115,0.009866349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982267,0.00008792634,0.0003245892,0.00006020114,0.0010829396,0.00021764112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802166,0.00020857084,0.00025007728,0.000037091384,0.0013074342,0.00017517987],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007052492,0.00008339915,0.00013417969,0.000052041796,0.0003710707,0.00008117293,0.00038539004,0.00006292535,0.010802565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063715765,0.000066532026,0.00015488671,0.00006546665,0.001751802,0.0009397143,0.000051795243,0.00013960584,0.0007883142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055142547,0.00008333648,0.001225521,8.4199155e-7,0.00015430556,0.0000105839135,0.0007851567,0.000018945364,0.000057452628,0.9842054,0.012573715,0.000829593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030608263,0.000016923834,0.0013114642,0.000025926702,0.00001819783,0.00004622162,0.00039869445,0.0000010926337,0.00009169562,0.0016918853,0.99600697,0.00008485371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023041252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006885399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98343325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035681023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023710894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236679568","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.7032","title":"Bedford-Jones, Rt Rev. Michael Hugh Harold, (born 29 Sept. 1942), a Suffragan Bishop of Toronto, 1994–2008 (Area Bishop of York Scarborough, 1994–2006, of Trent-Durham, 2006–08)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art history; Art; History","score_opus":0.03566128111900596,"score_gpt":0.3009635865416461,"score_spread":0.26530230542264016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236679568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10559527,0.22145541,0.000040068808,0.001334103,0.0063994457,0.005123317,0.0101663,0.0005215355,0.64936453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3187882,0.36924165,0.0020202172,0.00061601726,0.0068545835,0.0003951072,0.0023722784,0.00056167814,0.2991503],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885936,0.0007505435,0.0030607213,0.0016997835,0.00364135,0.002254023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928358,0.0008537886,0.0032172939,0.0014175571,0.0009994884,0.0006760284],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017645506,0.0016331753,0.004270656,0.0003762786,0.0009357169,0.0001410105,0.0024224028,0.0023681219,0.0016194461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000739523,0.001441216,0.001656823,0.0015564755,0.0028735313,0.0007071732,0.0007322966,0.0013251579,0.000028566335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054338854,0.0014663805,0.02108139,0.0035505928,0.002875268,0.000059912156,0.07663668,0.000022943246,0.00024055368,0.0016735354,0.84594816,0.045901172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019452067,0.00040905914,0.0074988496,0.004011203,0.00093334605,0.0000061472197,0.012085642,0.000015769327,0.0006520693,0.000101143385,0.9705477,0.0017938813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32461897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2159265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35021427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001596466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010492696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237609388","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u27277","title":"Mercer, Rev. Mgr Robert William Stanley, (born 10 Jan. 1935), Diocesan Bishop, Anglican Catholic Church of Canada, 1989–2005 (Assistant Bishop, 1988–89)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Art history; Theology; Genealogy; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026232119137664257,"score_gpt":0.2966238239852705,"score_spread":0.2703917048476062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237609388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039141674,0.052196886,0.000010659759,0.0065153386,0.0036577533,0.0024791076,0.0037158534,0.0003416125,0.89194113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.068623185,0.13434127,0.0002852304,0.00080973445,0.005258405,0.00023071839,0.00073948916,0.0002857771,0.7894262],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882478,0.00077955174,0.001885902,0.0017302127,0.004289734,0.0030667707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99408597,0.0006952622,0.0015291505,0.0011957742,0.0012161253,0.0012777159],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019361731,0.0014682672,0.0028762985,0.00041603096,0.00240518,0.0003497859,0.002235379,0.0015825632,0.0021913673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012873174,0.001256867,0.0007493285,0.0018244234,0.0019433543,0.00043317667,0.00059353054,0.0018531453,0.000052716947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108473185,0.00022739437,0.002263108,0.0006999255,0.0007309712,0.00013803244,0.02141457,0.000008656189,0.00001674602,0.00083162833,0.9437031,0.029857399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007060486,0.00010077846,0.018744258,0.0013491993,0.0003435798,0.0000036618842,0.0052674706,0.0000043280706,0.000056889727,0.000055061715,0.97187346,0.0014952818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8489259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9665201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11759419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052183066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052206013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237992252","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14310","title":"Chippewas of Mnjikaning First Nation v. Ontario, <i>[2010] O.J. No. 212 (Can.)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Political science; Volume (thermodynamics); Humanities; Library science; Media studies; Law and economics; Art; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Physics","score_opus":0.0355278059403537,"score_gpt":0.25742701748253416,"score_spread":0.22189921154218045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237992252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87759054,0.011457268,0.0000028708891,0.00758362,0.001799214,0.00074541214,0.00001973759,0.00006192422,0.1007394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9406996,0.051650364,0.0018768553,0.0018204221,0.00047976,0.00003651068,0.000014806368,0.000018373745,0.003403329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924064,0.000027019361,0.00028772338,0.00018144092,0.00005933691,0.00020386105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994439,0.0000872942,0.00019565581,0.00011166924,0.000084208266,0.00007729947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055377436,0.00010979023,0.00032546502,0.000010120099,0.0005856774,0.000048473703,0.00013669117,0.00007998028,0.00016421128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017850247,0.00009802821,0.00007448889,0.000041180127,0.00026262287,0.0002152249,0.00006233866,0.00017095156,0.000030340247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016272297,0.00016561039,0.059249334,0.0035698763,0.00033680213,0.0000020045607,0.06137159,0.0000149084235,0.0005156771,0.82385373,0.008602003,0.04230217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120531404,0.0000135196315,0.0041696397,0.00020069738,0.000062081606,8.9954e-7,0.00019130294,0.000007550407,0.000032204134,0.0003476694,0.99468756,0.00016637416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16521642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73898906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98608553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010993977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049886294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84034246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238071745","doi":"10.22215/etd/2003-05644","title":"Have we tried improving women's lives? Women in conflict with the law in Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender studies; Women's Lives; Political science; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.01572009203063706,"score_gpt":0.267266994467771,"score_spread":0.25154690243713396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238071745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83125824,0.0003222871,1.0615722e-7,0.0011194091,0.00019827283,0.00075172225,0.000005645607,0.000018806666,0.1663255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8982552,0.00020818884,0.000013681139,0.0005317399,0.000048584792,0.0004558888,0.000014629887,0.000017594264,0.10045449],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758023,0.0002756282,0.0002910183,0.0003390421,0.0006078223,0.00090622925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914485,0.00028058988,0.0002019174,0.00012336488,0.00010763036,0.00014167141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055703404,0.0002708981,0.00045291393,0.000040677955,0.00054734154,0.00011690278,0.00032216,0.00014328533,0.0003646448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016914339,0.00016151987,0.000031793494,0.00032986645,0.00016596615,0.00014320885,0.000019001016,0.00046471256,0.000004542963],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013443077,0.000039503255,0.0045145634,0.00009034649,0.00009094808,0.00003735182,0.98720354,0.000016612867,0.0000347142,0.004845287,0.0012012321,0.0017914842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043992454,0.000027811295,0.008407021,0.000047973772,0.0000064681994,1.0165308e-7,0.9334976,0.000003511455,0.000028674262,0.00004101124,0.05720214,0.0002977694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99576974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06699695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006845777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020009787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238408455","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19411","title":"Merpaw v. Hyde (c.o.b. City Limits Convenience) <i>[2015] O.J. No. 800; 2015 ONSC 1053 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, February 20, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Humanities; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.05733022544795584,"score_gpt":0.3092049537484531,"score_spread":0.25187472830049723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238408455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7447571,0.15210347,0.000018957711,0.016927015,0.0031218412,0.0021326852,0.00017000864,0.00015212403,0.0806168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7290455,0.24325351,0.00384524,0.007884985,0.0013464789,0.0001343913,0.000077964316,0.00007752557,0.014334385],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979114,0.00016648334,0.0006978499,0.00045580103,0.00021139196,0.0005570914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983603,0.000177962,0.000371319,0.0002844403,0.0003674917,0.00043852758],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015871425,0.0003046294,0.00097167137,0.000024215939,0.00061484,0.00009293392,0.0003715477,0.00015556178,0.00014873281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038320804,0.00026877574,0.00017195873,0.000104857405,0.00090492255,0.0006361733,0.00014156682,0.00025494618,0.0002136426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020446556,0.0008005726,0.083019614,0.0063943234,0.0011561259,0.000032639233,0.085967235,0.00008537379,0.0002839531,0.099396735,0.71082056,0.011838405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047001263,0.0000921615,0.002880279,0.00041033074,0.0004721912,0.0000051546185,0.0013902462,0.000024951207,0.00003314593,0.00017261102,0.9935989,0.00045006364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09998837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18492712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2827783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049805944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003754876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238433646","doi":"10.29173/alr277","title":"Ghost Dancing with Colonialism: Decolonization and Indigenous Rights at the Supreme Court of Canada, Grace Li Xiu Woo (Vancouver: UBS Press 2011)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Supreme court; Colonialism; Economic Justice; Law; Decolonization; Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.014824671932979436,"score_gpt":0.2651521155101807,"score_spread":0.25032744357720127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238433646","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6453211,0.31025437,0.0000053162426,0.010671455,0.0011400216,0.0042858818,0.000038782426,0.00003866982,0.028244399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691706,0.021226265,0.000060936018,0.001055272,0.0001453564,0.00008789405,0.00000925884,0.000015508836,0.008228914],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983393,0.00028234295,0.00027774333,0.00018599466,0.00046235608,0.0004522478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986292,0.0005430509,0.0002877077,0.00019215034,0.00020252752,0.00014532827],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005705046,0.0001672193,0.0003843289,0.0000048671986,0.0016412989,0.000027051803,0.00022107639,0.000064577594,0.0001406124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017844369,0.00009449986,0.000039669703,0.00012786004,0.0004165014,0.00028256333,0.00009628328,0.00009962659,0.0000076548995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009274324,0.0003273365,0.13167632,0.0046055624,0.00092773495,0.000012593467,0.33572742,0.00003272916,0.00003969687,0.06128111,0.46301046,0.0022663025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015066715,0.000028962282,0.007922498,0.00061334186,0.0002003415,0.0000027793471,0.00044612394,0.0000015089144,0.000079541525,0.000016959011,0.9903365,0.00020078175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97507167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52732605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039853665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016374871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238483413","doi":"10.1093/9780198727255.003.0035","title":"Canada—Alberta","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Legislation; Law; Scope (computer science); Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Politics; Civil rights; Public administration; Engineering","score_opus":0.0597085904050945,"score_gpt":0.29655027541090817,"score_spread":0.23684168500581368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238483413","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000047342055,0.00071806787,3.291895e-7,0.010681537,0.0005905386,0.0002072746,0.000019012534,0.00003974212,0.9877388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020099434,0.0001769477,0.00004293498,0.00056933746,0.0006662068,0.000004480387,0.000011523778,0.000017630065,0.99650097],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985488,0.000017808321,0.0001673384,0.00022927891,0.00074723636,0.0002895091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991405,0.00013743558,0.00009359852,0.00012999025,0.0002654653,0.00023302605],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015724414,0.0002008881,0.00028060784,0.000012631461,0.00045018183,0.000041409374,0.00027565056,0.00024327569,0.006035183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021043388,0.00015413352,0.000074372,0.00001566203,0.000239033,0.000041361214,0.00009196363,0.00019947444,0.00039433633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.784872e-7,9.761046e-7,0.000008520524,0.000002570594,0.00003569356,0.0000036821048,0.0011786429,1.906173e-7,5.1399123e-8,0.4446569,0.5528868,0.0012252047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050438743,0.000004624107,0.00001739075,0.000014984113,0.000022411035,1.6144601e-7,0.0006429284,2.5418353e-7,2.7775394e-7,0.0041156416,0.99488384,0.00024703608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9980875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44199708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013081771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017150127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99487346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238500261","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u244865","title":"Doull, Hon. John, (1 Nov. 1878–27 Oct. 1969), Judge, Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, 1933–61; permission to retain title Honourable granted upon retirement from Supreme Court","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Nova scotia; Law; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05120006649073198,"score_gpt":0.3231740844935051,"score_spread":0.2719740180027731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238500261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040602576,0.0105776675,0.00009494975,0.00731205,0.006181728,0.002668663,0.0010836126,0.0003358967,0.93114287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14275797,0.042183604,0.0024298008,0.00115394,0.006159939,0.00006844984,0.0017005389,0.00033981726,0.8032059],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941323,0.00034711792,0.0010148293,0.0010598273,0.0022452162,0.0012007271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99718183,0.00029976963,0.00058550487,0.00070691877,0.00070686394,0.00051910296],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011718596,0.0007504227,0.0014443101,0.00022164732,0.00077744835,0.00022971786,0.0010808565,0.0010507856,0.008292625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006892249,0.0006374436,0.00042018533,0.0007732181,0.0005284934,0.00022146993,0.00044093517,0.0009785121,0.0015804506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008574277,0.00013869823,0.0028067052,0.00017689825,0.00022543246,0.000022389951,0.0064339708,0.00000701517,0.00013295481,0.00027643412,0.98666626,0.0030275236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058397255,0.000119945755,0.0031876022,0.0018706815,0.0002133155,8.84277e-7,0.0020017296,0.000029142851,0.0004929564,0.00014428272,0.99050653,0.0008489272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0815045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040095482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12793691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012958352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005797228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238683358","doi":"10.7202/042920ar","title":"Les donations","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022770388662599016,"score_gpt":0.29154842890246074,"score_spread":0.26877804023986174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238683358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65064496,0.018441215,0.0011981322,0.10655542,0.0011346169,0.00036986178,0.000058532045,0.00020743176,0.22138983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7732122,0.0017385264,0.0040612067,0.00082979386,0.0019745096,0.000026986598,0.000007023326,0.000017336914,0.21813245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821633,0.00020539248,0.00024665106,0.00027815087,0.00039588948,0.0006575889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912405,0.00029600336,0.00010829736,0.00013194873,0.00012168083,0.00021802179],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003936365,0.00019740606,0.00022822787,0.000038085367,0.0018649064,0.00010480339,0.00031675387,0.00047423836,0.0011219458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003589112,0.00020464239,0.00019926734,0.00038279846,0.0021062708,0.00032882174,0.000045678073,0.0005565128,0.0006166369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050391714,0.00010745228,0.0022567906,0.000025384881,0.00013174242,0.000008876621,0.10800479,0.00024442346,0.0000750842,0.57524246,0.014499414,0.2993985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023822117,0.000022200084,0.01609788,0.000039086925,0.000088147346,0.0000036927754,0.016134482,0.00022801264,0.00008470786,0.009109884,0.9576406,0.00031309453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019832347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016358975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94314116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037976422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059648235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238978280","doi":"10.7588/worllitetoda.91.3-4.0016","title":"Labrador","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Literature Today","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.02143503517190618,"score_gpt":0.3209963752939677,"score_spread":0.2995613401220615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238978280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0543062,0.0035461066,0.0000041240655,0.0758625,0.0025173698,0.00044466506,0.000029706374,0.00028153916,0.8630078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7808904,0.000087629494,0.0005154826,0.00054494356,0.0011967173,0.00001538337,0.0000044217145,0.000007880514,0.21673712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988594,0.00010109175,0.00012255345,0.00023286196,0.00031997095,0.00036410327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991728,0.00007581199,0.000118546515,0.00036840528,0.00013270209,0.00013170257],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033647162,0.00013378235,0.00016930245,0.000035807392,0.0035385063,0.0010894935,0.00057509943,0.00008637333,0.0005072664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054149557,0.000098383636,0.00009852337,0.00015473664,0.000401974,0.00056369905,0.000119128585,0.00025770307,0.0002092082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003451435,0.00009368306,0.02435112,0.000039738374,0.000110416986,0.00009724644,0.20064303,9.0655845e-7,0.00033136035,0.43852144,0.2938347,0.04194186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014932212,0.000005195173,0.051869996,0.00007048877,0.000008601741,2.8684545e-7,0.0005682351,9.067885e-7,0.000046266265,0.0009245391,0.94620395,0.00015222307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019467941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012372397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7265842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009113996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026507945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239195434","doi":"10.24124/2005/bpgub333","title":"Clash of concepts: An exploration into the conflicts between Aboriginal self-government and liberalism.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Heritage; University of Northern British Columbia; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Northern British Columbia","keywords":"Liberalism; Government (linguistics); Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Media studies; Art; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03671595647278105,"score_gpt":0.3817136461993369,"score_spread":0.34499768972655587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239195434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92270446,0.0005224002,0.000008091194,0.003236412,0.00032351364,0.0007836095,0.000023961908,0.000094082156,0.0723035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977351,0.002771063,0.0007889064,0.00015352796,0.00097238866,0.00005347586,0.00017403987,0.000016896169,0.017718704],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980034,0.00022317027,0.00033148366,0.0002711733,0.0009335126,0.00023723753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990605,0.0001723763,0.0003138153,0.00012373169,0.00022759705,0.00010197362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004403889,0.0002081343,0.00031603753,0.000014390516,0.00079647976,0.00012656173,0.00024553755,0.00024928615,0.000092156326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056091038,0.00013621352,0.000062498264,0.0001196645,0.00027842255,0.0007142596,0.000020125031,0.00019723718,0.000008246044],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025227608,0.00005163142,0.0028288257,0.000056154928,0.00017001358,4.2701043e-7,0.93811285,0.0000026678795,0.00009488309,0.044212878,0.0011617513,0.013282672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003675989,0.00011519336,0.031131761,0.00006676562,0.00021883514,4.9116082e-8,0.3995526,0.000010219665,0.00094221096,0.00062169763,0.5665971,0.00037596587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012862334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057265773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56543535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028279994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000098185155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239596921","doi":"10.24124/2000/bpgub154","title":"The Sto:lo world view and the individualism of Canadian law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Individualism; Political science; Common law; Sociology","score_opus":0.026786852201098194,"score_gpt":0.31119254377734007,"score_spread":0.28440569157624185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239596921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016003147,0.008820374,1.125396e-8,0.0141673,0.0004056129,0.00065164734,0.000022775854,0.000019186684,0.95991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6148855,0.014523077,0.000024496187,0.0010486393,0.00026536814,0.00008884306,0.00006207037,0.00001512287,0.36908686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866503,0.00026778752,0.00022538612,0.0001487207,0.00039886564,0.00029421394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904805,0.00049003377,0.00012970371,0.00011732257,0.00010886838,0.00010599709],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072050246,0.00014314766,0.00025725077,0.000053289536,0.002704489,0.00020161859,0.0003624222,0.00012621655,0.0004129037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011957588,0.000064957356,0.0000887908,0.00040651,0.00096459495,0.00006656083,0.000014679895,0.00021993415,0.000017312734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020556183,0.000003882455,0.000066921835,0.000019230318,0.00011661028,5.5754435e-7,0.11923947,2.0928594e-7,3.3770354e-7,0.8499808,0.016036695,0.014514759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014182818,0.000002998566,0.0041873306,0.000040966366,0.000059385104,5.231321e-8,0.044545893,2.6387204e-7,0.000004082786,0.0018599617,0.9490514,0.00010583578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9623869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9330147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009256897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019742173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99859387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239997036","doi":"10.3138/9781442663077","title":"Free to Believe","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.028032474632750933,"score_gpt":0.24604847176744737,"score_spread":0.21801599713469644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239997036","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000038316583,0.0012863759,0.000013158504,0.0002491407,0.00027062054,0.00076810224,0.0001315749,0.0000948221,0.9971479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000084784806,0.00050194806,0.0008144345,0.00005226896,0.00025930206,0.0000011081693,0.0000066399434,0.000014410805,0.9982651],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985498,0.000097535536,0.00013647732,0.00032474333,0.0005573595,0.00033405467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987529,0.00010073587,0.00019401412,0.0003650572,0.00034545735,0.00024185705],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001335616,0.00022057722,0.00041644002,0.000012336614,0.00061618147,0.00003331455,0.0011665367,0.0003680441,0.0011175767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007608438,0.00024079342,0.00019775369,0.0000017552024,0.00052315625,0.00016636161,0.0007178031,0.00015496933,0.00005562072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021592909,0.000013089623,0.0000032450826,0.0000462554,0.0001806917,0.0000068348395,0.12378,0.0000011582879,0.000011053152,0.06414127,0.8074367,0.004358105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021663363,0.000040565843,0.00010323854,0.0001015512,0.00008941833,6.2013044e-8,0.0019189276,5.152463e-7,0.000008450036,0.00032200146,0.9969214,0.00027722132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79307425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45809373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33498052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001434468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020405192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240323807","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0002","title":"Indigenous Constitutionalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Indigenous; Constitution; Political science; State (computer science); Indigenous rights; Order (exchange); Geography; Ethnology; Sociology; Law; Ecology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.051848290614391654,"score_gpt":0.26837406279559683,"score_spread":0.21652577218120517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240323807","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007400616,0.00024609803,0.000013019299,0.00014314115,0.00044674124,0.0005152873,0.00016643754,0.0001462188,0.99824905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018189938,0.0015674413,0.000100914825,0.000042705145,0.00035015141,8.8861725e-7,0.000020509442,0.000014642371,0.99608374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864095,0.000045769102,0.0001208477,0.00034656283,0.00049016153,0.0003557145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889535,0.000075709206,0.00030236604,0.00030916242,0.00023802566,0.00017937829],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015080119,0.00026435213,0.0003418796,0.0000535093,0.003886756,0.00012600838,0.0008055029,0.0005051552,0.00009657152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004302482,0.00027954188,0.00022149443,0.0000024288606,0.0021264523,0.00015831357,0.00035005214,0.0003725358,0.0000075757516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016144408,0.0000048679776,0.0000093979515,0.000014997721,0.00016334301,0.00010954876,0.0075773913,6.345703e-7,7.6520087e-7,0.98470825,0.0031485772,0.0042460687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023345843,0.000012339909,0.00002918302,0.000078854915,0.00012802922,0.0000012240289,0.0005442325,2.3473565e-7,0.0000028588154,0.0015510028,0.99707097,0.0003475966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059242765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023261064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9939224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005702926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034683078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240655957","doi":"10.1108/rr.2002.16.6.49.325","title":"The Canadian Encyclopedia","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Reviews","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Encyclopedia; Foundation (evidence); Library science; Marsh; Geography; Archaeology; Biology; Wetland; Computer science; Ecology","score_opus":0.14629021198624517,"score_gpt":0.3502135251671849,"score_spread":0.20392331318093973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240655957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00086241704,0.07266745,7.48947e-7,0.013098236,0.00027748878,0.00053359766,0.0000025534562,0.000036797053,0.9125207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20715849,0.72780865,0.00018569657,0.0005476325,0.00041838965,0.00012289254,0.0000015631454,0.000007079464,0.0637496],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859524,0.00032530673,0.000216499,0.0001510228,0.00024581782,0.0004661303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928874,0.00012932128,0.000079609774,0.00017939742,0.000078292636,0.00024461575],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081147905,0.000100776786,0.00017888595,0.000012910548,0.003193656,0.00014174961,0.00038364067,0.00007284052,0.0009422147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011353027,0.000053965934,0.00007059309,0.00022753626,0.00027665388,0.00011399866,0.000026010403,0.00017531528,0.0032039387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.5021117e-7,0.000008770348,0.0018657566,0.000012316247,0.00001129744,0.000002233175,0.013065528,8.522066e-8,0.000001483968,0.062161095,0.1681271,0.754744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021014797,0.0000042178485,0.0019989985,0.000022929891,0.0000069385283,1.8783798e-7,0.0004970363,0.000002323918,2.5867774e-7,0.00017567063,0.9971802,0.00009020155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3520062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94304943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8487711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036243373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006797044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240803944","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.14656","title":"Wheatley, Rt Rev. Peter William, (born 7 Sept. 1947), Area Bishop of Edmonton, 1999–2014; an Honorary Assistant Bishop: Diocese of Southwark, since 2013; Diocese of London, since 2015; Diocese of Chichester, since 2015","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gerontology; History; Art; Medicine","score_opus":0.034342708648013524,"score_gpt":0.3143474812083674,"score_spread":0.2800047725603539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240803944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49231184,0.35884517,0.00027428684,0.0055250144,0.0057697813,0.0075366083,0.020348217,0.00059193856,0.10879712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69675297,0.24408264,0.0016105339,0.00023380177,0.0022806004,0.00016098448,0.0014482846,0.00036504943,0.053065106],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98633015,0.0013946949,0.003719374,0.0021283291,0.0043526734,0.0020747664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872009,0.0012652263,0.0050479253,0.0021514955,0.0033317918,0.0010026289],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031105476,0.0018410442,0.004830446,0.0005997141,0.0007461333,0.00020618626,0.003320275,0.0019886976,0.000273821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015385549,0.0015171904,0.0013315815,0.0020174717,0.0054773744,0.0017753005,0.0010734817,0.0016384082,0.000050659044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002419834,0.0050193234,0.118478775,0.012601295,0.0037905828,0.0002037178,0.07023492,0.00013343804,0.0019928822,0.00073658046,0.76719683,0.017191805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037119563,0.0016001653,0.099324405,0.013569673,0.0016656123,0.000015009009,0.009497973,0.000073210365,0.0021436505,0.0002925596,0.8641039,0.0040018773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033634804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030820182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20444115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008543576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017570801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240894957","doi":"10.1093/9780198727255.003.0036","title":"Canada—British Columbia","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Legislation; Law; Scope (computer science); Government (linguistics); Politics; Work (physics); Public administration; Engineering","score_opus":0.044029671233593005,"score_gpt":0.27156478129789424,"score_spread":0.22753511006430124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240894957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000040931303,0.001410284,3.2188728e-7,0.0018853633,0.0006986929,0.00030735708,0.00011106202,0.00009691408,0.99544907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031182878,0.0004258777,0.000071739654,0.0004949162,0.0007162654,0.000008005331,0.000018285888,0.000022028613,0.9951246],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819434,0.000024810537,0.00019984075,0.00027773494,0.00096445275,0.00033881015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999021,0.000061052175,0.00010524994,0.00011501919,0.00042835588,0.00026934745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022178232,0.00013614498,0.00032871624,0.000005582126,0.0008500387,0.0003662373,0.00028784535,0.0002834952,0.014967454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017352727,0.00019060884,0.000083290324,0.000020378113,0.0003634883,0.0000721373,0.00010434302,0.00023960242,0.00014132883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.05429e-7,0.0000017933182,0.00007224398,0.0000043952755,0.000043313707,0.00003293271,0.00041009963,9.25345e-8,3.4124795e-8,0.024168123,0.9715778,0.003688826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070799,0.0000064169403,0.0002616366,0.000038350936,0.000025131483,9.139586e-7,0.00076129386,1.4523441e-7,2.3862283e-8,0.0045747957,0.99396664,0.00029385125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99984866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022388801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014902084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019552396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.985933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241035024","doi":"10.3138/tjt.35.2.232","title":"Toronto School of Theology: Theses Completed Academic Year 2018–19","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Sociology; Pedagogy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03747749280377985,"score_gpt":0.3408805945257472,"score_spread":0.3034031017219674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241035024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7313015,0.023531439,0.0000735514,0.0038529476,0.0026119847,0.00053830375,0.000013716016,0.00004979773,0.23802677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98912376,0.0032034644,0.0004564896,0.00031255203,0.00065075845,0.0000031353661,8.0542327e-7,0.000013301619,0.0062357318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974057,0.0008492383,0.0006471688,0.0001807863,0.0004526412,0.00046443535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766314,0.00071969785,0.00081581686,0.00020174825,0.00037844706,0.00022113886],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015545953,0.00018293208,0.00069584313,0.000024967281,0.00021773826,0.000013531592,0.0008686573,0.00031897306,0.017879995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012538789,0.00012800655,0.00024022958,0.00005050154,0.00080271,0.00060305034,0.00016994133,0.00035937782,0.00017060158],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018707577,0.00034086342,0.34066266,0.00010627559,0.0018450207,0.000027857157,0.118139446,0.000083583276,0.013305157,0.4595203,0.05859929,0.0054987874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005967246,0.0027327747,0.38707095,0.00031594277,0.0004967836,0.00010977862,0.1925504,0.00003939551,0.00056743715,0.039136115,0.36982417,0.0011889861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033126324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01927598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4203842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008830316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019397895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241121742","doi":"10.3138/9781442663077-fm","title":"Frontmatter","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"ECW Press (Canada)","funders":"Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences; University of Toronto; Ontario Arts Council; Government of Canada; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Council for the Arts","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.03208755335491715,"score_gpt":0.23826388188082503,"score_spread":0.2061763285259079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241121742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000020210466,0.001660703,0.000010139586,0.00015534474,0.00022245596,0.0004233136,0.00003761074,0.000077659664,0.99739254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00037026723,0.00048618432,0.00044186905,0.00003828023,0.00017842166,3.835118e-7,0.0000049368555,0.000015155611,0.9984645],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989046,0.0000461457,0.00012957377,0.00026622167,0.00040828006,0.00024518798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991315,0.000060326187,0.00023577544,0.00021445357,0.00022920809,0.00012872313],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000088300985,0.00021075837,0.00037375386,0.0000081354,0.00049763493,0.000027102835,0.000507266,0.0003621504,0.0154376775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000113486685,0.00022224452,0.00021967407,3.7077254e-7,0.00074269314,0.00018256139,0.00025056372,0.00014978019,0.00031390451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028234745,0.0000128573865,0.000007492169,0.00006114417,0.0003952596,0.000014470921,0.09022255,5.421414e-7,0.000014893719,0.38661295,0.51010644,0.012523145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018015859,0.000018241148,0.00006459305,0.00007466653,0.0001026892,9.551506e-8,0.00094292086,9.796776e-7,0.0000049556784,0.00031374893,0.9980478,0.00024914872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68802154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19967902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48834252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005601687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052082924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98546237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241123400","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1681212","title":"Review of Guardianship, Custody and Access Under the Domestic Relations Act of Alberta (Part 4 of 6) – Guardianship. A Research Study of the Concept of Guardianship as Distinguished from Custody with Proposals for Reform .","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.053853029011960526,"score_gpt":0.40238432484578374,"score_spread":0.3485312958338232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241123400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9578201,0.024160288,0.00003501994,0.010069188,0.0001073726,0.0032605769,0.00004161962,0.000008153642,0.0044976384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930855,0.0060976883,0.00004094087,0.000049081737,0.00013794105,0.00003934854,0.00000383587,0.0000167768,0.0005288647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948099,0.0015010627,0.0010483903,0.00028856745,0.0012691327,0.001082908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947273,0.0019809005,0.0012709461,0.00044269837,0.001485993,0.00009214982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064415694,0.00022685195,0.00087590213,0.00008406997,0.00088473887,0.000040871793,0.0010632644,0.00012370419,0.000035589812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040394054,0.00011733135,0.00027870695,0.001007235,0.0014519208,0.00028482973,0.0001178028,0.0011716012,6.09505e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024844003,0.0037824549,0.18620063,0.0025688915,0.007968284,0.0000049143077,0.33522418,0.00037398082,0.0012230274,0.43425646,0.003922106,0.021990642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0061419406,0.0068140468,0.22852656,0.009837701,0.0027714262,0.000032846594,0.5679262,0.0000140849925,0.0011362195,0.1727439,0.0032442135,0.0008108624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032378368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04139994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26151258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000675271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025084708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97609204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241430101","doi":"10.1177/153124450404200307","title":"Elijah and Ishmael: Assessing Cultural Identity in Canadian Child Custody Decisions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child custody; Identity (music); Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Criminology; Aesthetics; Art","score_opus":0.055573893221110914,"score_gpt":0.3959579417072403,"score_spread":0.3403840484861294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241430101","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38346058,0.49341342,0.000020898528,0.05551385,0.00068309763,0.0014498675,0.000021506323,0.00010856522,0.06532822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71377224,0.28251365,0.00038915288,0.0030271332,0.00013635814,0.000027122374,0.0000067930155,0.000008547198,0.00011900378],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981801,0.00019012102,0.00032999192,0.0002920744,0.00044734654,0.00056038226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914527,0.0000933146,0.00008729948,0.00013689723,0.00016159107,0.0003756114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011063672,0.00016915024,0.00039390847,0.000052866755,0.0012681982,0.00026243296,0.00027967998,0.00010599753,0.00004898443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016753826,0.00013061357,0.000095677635,0.0006313692,0.00025273647,0.0010200865,0.00007443868,0.00029769767,0.00010252791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011737309,0.0005678899,0.21811153,0.0026534905,0.0004089423,0.0006221066,0.111159995,0.00011911694,0.00023467302,0.14703712,0.1446742,0.3743992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002419554,0.000007750531,0.38714722,0.004803254,0.000050444145,0.0000039632214,0.005465226,0.0000017308139,6.175436e-7,0.0004975059,0.601495,0.0002853288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7619136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9034949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45682082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009332939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032888213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97540843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241496052","doi":"10.29173/alr331","title":"Editors' Note","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.03775668322918225,"score_gpt":0.3358399519150401,"score_spread":0.2980832686858579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241496052","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019108042,0.11481534,0.0000036232805,0.05808176,0.00330743,0.0010062696,0.0000025763331,0.00011802117,0.8207542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30113047,0.6100556,0.0006931406,0.02261722,0.0138130095,0.00020356441,0.000015536449,0.00004175237,0.05142969],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987269,0.00017476761,0.00021868074,0.00019645142,0.00036770117,0.0003155001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917734,0.00034370585,0.000079828875,0.00016624061,0.00010427779,0.00012860718],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026984682,0.00012253727,0.00030922215,0.00000478054,0.0011775068,0.00001731901,0.00025098913,0.00006731027,0.00070731965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007950545,0.00008917137,0.00015063184,0.00020075923,0.0004820275,0.00020911524,0.000056528832,0.00011488037,0.0014552958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020747766,0.000063215506,0.0011217527,0.00049256685,0.000056314006,0.000014098885,0.011556332,1.9215811e-7,0.000008292544,0.20585772,0.7753958,0.0054316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005538442,0.000007463753,0.0003451496,0.00039868627,0.000030009285,0.0000018671948,0.00004016803,2.1384808e-7,0.0000054694106,0.000057977744,0.99892104,0.0001365905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.109614894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028568322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7693245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093942734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000452745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241570141","doi":"10.3138/jcs.39.2.5","title":"Are Municipalities Creatures of the Provinces?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Creatures; Politics; Democracy; State (computer science); Local government; Government (linguistics); Everyday life; Sociology; Political science; Public administration; Political economy; Law; Geography; Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.07009286883118983,"score_gpt":0.34181375979116463,"score_spread":0.2717208909599748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241570141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8600201,0.035222944,8.598177e-8,0.072302476,0.00070905255,0.00019297806,0.000019570534,0.000007651685,0.031525135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99078757,0.0028206175,0.00014016224,0.0005736038,0.00073034666,0.0000026604066,3.8774786e-8,0.000004796574,0.0049402155],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986641,0.00017425125,0.0003349044,0.00006401055,0.00047404374,0.00028872656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819255,0.00019286171,0.0006607349,0.00009197899,0.00070849655,0.000153385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005616315,0.00009919592,0.0003296524,0.00013847106,0.00089092634,0.00003077744,0.00038897837,0.000056274013,0.000030655156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018833796,0.000055264034,0.00017370666,0.0003518391,0.00084273994,0.00020469728,0.00004891416,0.00019623413,0.0000021825265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036300447,0.000060676208,0.10559952,0.000097153876,0.001601757,0.00003438892,0.55137515,0.00019496483,0.000048149574,0.028903889,0.3042927,0.007755328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013555202,0.000020136848,0.08448814,0.00013361798,0.000063269836,0.0000026431223,0.2612458,3.412938e-7,0.00008719375,0.00028397195,0.65345895,0.000080414124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24345694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9638547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7203977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056650856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003763196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76158094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242019933","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u157961","title":"Newnham, Ven. Obadiah Samuel, (23 March 1848–13 May 1932), Archdeacon of Fredericton since 1907","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ven; Art; History; Humanities","score_opus":0.05413239036701066,"score_gpt":0.33952079927601475,"score_spread":0.2853884089090041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242019933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02229302,0.042463224,0.000060358627,0.0061954767,0.0045905113,0.0023331486,0.000633226,0.00038066044,0.92105037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13334925,0.23341654,0.001305652,0.0008758383,0.00943928,0.0002079076,0.0006766024,0.0002694688,0.62045944],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99298346,0.00066554046,0.0011041377,0.001117228,0.0023553504,0.0017743079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962431,0.0010534627,0.00086437614,0.0006812931,0.0006068836,0.00055084],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013356295,0.000863543,0.0017578912,0.00027637274,0.0013689187,0.00024617632,0.0015268605,0.0013548755,0.00059170503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010336868,0.0007575547,0.00060577854,0.00096826797,0.0019377575,0.00031374584,0.000562191,0.0015277902,0.00035957235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015081935,0.0003477393,0.008092634,0.0015596413,0.00085925526,0.00011614561,0.039341863,0.000019173885,0.00005386462,0.0106729,0.85374516,0.08504079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044364674,0.00011873019,0.014332666,0.0013563043,0.00015632319,0.0000016715991,0.004491217,0.000007969916,0.000070001566,0.00040788887,0.97770894,0.0009046707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.080279596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027499685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3005909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013680869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088782667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242982682","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14663463","title":"The dawn of the Somali written word: an analysis of the creation and implementation of the Somali written language","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Somali; Orthography; History; Linguistics; Sociology; Philosophy; Reading (process)","score_opus":0.021821850348758137,"score_gpt":0.35698581639710525,"score_spread":0.3351639660483471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242982682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98781955,0.0006306525,0.000008554339,0.007537127,0.00021997241,0.0008297877,0.00008806938,0.000013762743,0.002852542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980433,0.00036670698,0.00008742652,0.00009340283,0.000086993845,0.000043792952,0.000022005162,0.000007983027,0.0012484055],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690753,0.0011152169,0.000558456,0.00030349387,0.0008902253,0.00022508985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771196,0.00035553434,0.0008432637,0.00066988444,0.00038461073,0.000034771354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011093067,0.00018745486,0.00042554172,0.000035079498,0.0011427489,0.0001336278,0.0009593705,0.00015662049,0.00020741501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031309426,0.00007538303,0.00048052034,0.000762588,0.0010252432,0.00012107161,0.0011140933,0.00024581916,2.0770396e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013378757,0.00009314971,0.6504232,0.000094099334,0.0024488978,2.4023433e-7,0.32556114,0.00025971569,0.0031191332,0.009263659,0.0002648066,0.008458553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010293275,0.0000062774575,0.7030829,0.000034859895,0.00088800304,6.58251e-8,0.29338887,0.00008411364,0.0019580966,0.00017136084,0.0001995152,0.00008295219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14454246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3009459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15640345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013341961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016057161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87892157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243083972","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u200152","title":"McCorkill, Hon. John Charles, (31 Aug. 1854–10 March 1920), a Puisne Judge, Superior Court, Montreal, since 1906","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; History; Art; Art history; Political science","score_opus":0.03473295275430472,"score_gpt":0.3108135794008903,"score_spread":0.2760806266465856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243083972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009936779,0.08894106,0.00002092361,0.011838157,0.005111375,0.0033127451,0.0017839671,0.00078731665,0.87826765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0053840154,0.28080457,0.00028838348,0.0006094308,0.0075221024,0.0002675966,0.00059368735,0.00017054347,0.70435965],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904329,0.0006095659,0.0012934275,0.001800268,0.0030575497,0.0028062533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99549615,0.000879136,0.00074337516,0.0009536576,0.00096914894,0.00095852715],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015574003,0.0013921227,0.0023660646,0.0003329371,0.003243179,0.0008408125,0.0020577742,0.0020092027,0.0019563467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012023816,0.0011853464,0.00079886353,0.0011734898,0.0026431906,0.00058845634,0.00079382356,0.0021393807,0.0015467798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096254545,0.0002120762,0.0010802897,0.00033724983,0.00039419843,0.00015303267,0.009194464,0.000001931728,0.0000040646646,0.0008899551,0.942428,0.04520847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000779179,0.00012423622,0.009258324,0.0012226609,0.00026531558,0.0000056871972,0.00454089,0.000013237228,0.000012172817,0.00011478062,0.98216295,0.00150058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09545938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.074545376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19186352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023301719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013545024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243979594","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190927301.003.0008","title":"Conclusion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Indigenous; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.053582513901164815,"score_gpt":0.3129889558738929,"score_spread":0.2594064419727281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243979594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004144511,0.00056853704,0.0000071971067,0.016292004,0.00035101583,0.00026991853,0.000008119167,0.00020918959,0.98228985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0045162872,0.00093657937,0.00019733961,0.001185202,0.0009792858,0.0000033217855,0.0000088928955,0.000017182054,0.9921559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998926,0.000020238673,0.00015332115,0.00024541176,0.00048297277,0.0001720441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950504,0.00008431394,0.00008736967,0.00007724746,0.00010478219,0.00014126931],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000104537954,0.00017154978,0.0002617556,0.000012243716,0.0007627209,0.000048445396,0.00021512779,0.0002819571,0.0067928196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011107464,0.00013036339,0.00014536732,0.000016849222,0.00035971988,0.000059582708,0.00021547555,0.0002338365,0.0022926903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020687983,0.0000014647567,0.0000046452196,0.000006111041,0.000034034827,0.000007631588,0.0060211695,5.591504e-8,0.0000041515423,0.9113046,0.079282925,0.0033311509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005694917,0.0000124458675,0.000012053324,0.00002360978,0.000023228054,7.873446e-8,0.000813842,7.139902e-7,0.0000026305752,0.011122453,0.98773515,0.00019687072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017801506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020950763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9084522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020859262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065306034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99848413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244206916","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107706798","title":"Sir Edward Coke and the Reformation of the Laws","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Coke; Ignorance; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Opposition (politics); Context (archaeology); Settlement (finance); Political science; History; Philosophy; Engineering; Economics; Archaeology; Politics","score_opus":0.018580765575071302,"score_gpt":0.22291956542862384,"score_spread":0.20433879985355255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244206916","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009027402,0.00017239421,0.000013988211,0.00057403627,0.00025278985,0.0006609902,0.000051770294,0.00003799538,0.9973333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015453688,0.0002431562,0.000011207814,0.00009289999,0.0001772984,0.000001247303,0.000005249813,0.0000074791215,0.9840078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986772,0.00041875878,0.00014610997,0.00017028816,0.0004009825,0.00018668527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988809,0.000262522,0.00033978993,0.00025421105,0.00020657621,0.000055983066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045380273,0.0001594297,0.00030917797,0.000020486415,0.0012119536,0.000040482526,0.000592343,0.00022314236,0.0000011962559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000103162674,0.00009311953,0.00017502512,0.000016242111,0.0025298432,0.00008568268,0.00044553378,0.00028974036,0.0000025549818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043529526,0.0000027011067,0.000009829784,0.00006112208,0.000083202765,8.413381e-7,0.006728725,9.2743954e-7,0.0000022583229,0.9020634,0.090456925,0.00054649304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005175318,0.0000075622174,0.00023863766,0.00008229476,0.00015091248,4.0552035e-7,0.001649715,0.000012099699,0.000021724847,0.000024717576,0.99716705,0.00012734822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047091716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003352404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90671015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003158788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012357456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93214893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245123283","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2348724","title":"Rights-Based Strategies to Address Homelessness and Poverty in Canada: The Constitutional Framework","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Political science; Criminology; Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.011720409636074293,"score_gpt":0.27050495564973565,"score_spread":0.25878454601366135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245123283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95677334,0.0030933071,0.0017004986,0.033655286,0.00041800388,0.00059576327,0.0000073727165,0.000021875672,0.0037345416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987019,0.00033074612,0.00006558876,0.0005464427,0.00020051401,0.000029372728,5.2346775e-7,0.0000035017117,0.000121462326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975127,0.00023037495,0.00018838233,0.00014662587,0.00047841488,0.001443517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921155,0.00037346777,0.00007466171,0.00006649856,0.00015040522,0.00012343255],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089429494,0.00012315395,0.00017347191,0.00002978587,0.0013140627,0.00021509585,0.00029222196,0.0000639833,0.00011919413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023050286,0.00007248137,0.000034117278,0.00023214925,0.00045429042,0.0002817022,0.00003235466,0.0011018867,0.000010098657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013712098,0.000016329925,0.011760747,0.0000026278685,0.000051102164,0.0000031572158,0.0034911612,0.0002872741,0.000008658719,0.9816821,0.0006029755,0.00208013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068718795,0.00007023555,0.11528386,0.00009163255,0.00002643697,0.000015400045,0.20758279,0.00007882819,0.00001694165,0.6595242,0.016170701,0.00045176284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9445187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99656355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3221579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033966717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010964322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245275061","doi":"10.3138/ecf.22.3.443","title":"Reforming Character: William Law and the English Theophrastan Tradition","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Rhetorical question; Moral character; Extant taxon; Literature; Order (exchange); Rhetorical device; Law; Sociology; Aesthetics; History; Philosophy; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.011036357018676361,"score_gpt":0.24688000211449695,"score_spread":0.2358436450958206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245275061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8388501,0.0011910873,0.00001108652,0.0027867933,0.0054575903,0.00078597467,0.00002095354,0.0002799153,0.15061653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923595,0.004839246,0.00006225415,0.0002801153,0.0022096813,0.000050872106,0.000021897475,0.000011179693,0.00016522004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998664,0.00019636968,0.00021583258,0.00024538115,0.0003823648,0.0002960074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930924,0.00017055521,0.00013969249,0.0001467549,0.00013623876,0.00009752672],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000750235,0.00014962417,0.00016867643,0.000023342252,0.0022956596,0.00018287668,0.00015798217,0.00014440253,0.00012119749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018790907,0.00009180102,0.0000921833,0.0001429026,0.00088030705,0.000689212,0.000039454855,0.00040242836,0.000016613662],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104477294,0.00008152105,0.0007618074,0.0000126066625,0.000055547895,0.0000013944507,0.09008505,3.180135e-7,0.0011483117,0.8981286,0.002091914,0.007528446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010161623,0.000026487915,0.011164678,0.000021200747,0.00005144876,0.0000018297593,0.015760258,0.000024825082,0.0002638888,0.0007415553,0.97071296,0.00021468365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001634127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014664364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9686211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112926915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016726084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245396718","doi":"10.3138/flor.20.035","title":"University of New Brunswick","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Florilegium","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SAINT; History; Middle English; Classics; Archaeology; Art history","score_opus":0.03172135274545302,"score_gpt":0.26994951715617926,"score_spread":0.23822816441072625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245396718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14048037,0.0009146621,0.0025846,0.0060722386,0.043911126,0.00059510756,0.0000066988505,0.00026049608,0.8051747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8311929,0.00027674966,0.00773281,0.0001173572,0.0071985833,2.4906154e-7,0.0000020363914,0.0000113058395,0.15346801],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934924,0.00008757667,0.00006252044,0.0001096482,0.00020463453,0.00018637121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965733,0.000042317806,0.000047699465,0.00007867752,0.000071441216,0.00010252833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016319931,0.00005579334,0.000110834575,0.000011921939,0.00034893566,0.000009830395,0.00013399082,0.000057324716,0.0007997943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001969318,0.000054571257,0.00006125306,0.00016984966,0.00018455638,0.00012273397,0.00002115131,0.00005883574,0.000113502516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013056011,0.000037965976,0.01740888,0.000010218726,0.00004670642,0.000005605662,0.0694478,0.000017543063,0.000017691453,0.36875945,0.54390216,0.00033293513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016811883,0.000010473393,0.0089887455,0.000004647663,0.000010366349,9.861157e-8,0.01224423,0.0000014740575,0.0000138138785,0.00047806153,0.97801,0.00006998845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048029847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017413717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6907125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009097666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003121665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97172624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245692135","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0013","title":"Contending Sovereignties","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Constitution; Legislature; Negotiation; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Relation (database); Indigenous rights; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06963348852814599,"score_gpt":0.2711996996659675,"score_spread":0.20156621113782153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245692135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004498664,0.00019777476,0.000010254721,0.00013730327,0.00047039744,0.00040261023,0.00008264407,0.00017614459,0.9984779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0056675985,0.001583031,0.00008075717,0.00002933548,0.0003613473,7.016383e-7,0.000008531295,0.000024233173,0.9922445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985893,0.000050614457,0.0001324637,0.00037607396,0.00045213912,0.0003994259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882567,0.000102383994,0.00036340582,0.00033578172,0.00020869383,0.00016406162],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016549628,0.00030665044,0.00043245652,0.000058778704,0.0031398626,0.00019177118,0.00086643244,0.00046352524,0.00012447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062218365,0.00031878054,0.0002845691,0.0000022356123,0.0013155851,0.00023732265,0.0004834817,0.0003899506,0.000005581927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002668558,0.0000028958111,0.000008789058,0.000022449345,0.00018610357,0.000060522838,0.005506465,2.4815137e-7,0.0000017465314,0.9857854,0.00506248,0.0033362182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027027063,0.000016554834,0.000020545027,0.00013901765,0.00014454233,4.6681873e-7,0.0015789727,9.3455304e-7,0.0000072620605,0.00225304,0.9951714,0.00039696138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035508738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011046864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99010897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047149477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012706821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245890390","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u29380","title":"Marsh, Rt Rev. Edward Frank, (25 Oct. 1935–28 June 2023), Bishop of Central Newfoundland, 1990–2000; Diocesan Administrator, Diocese of Central Newfoundland, 2005","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marsh; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.0281213784703585,"score_gpt":0.3060987456668407,"score_spread":0.2779773671964822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245890390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15902077,0.10890614,0.000095675336,0.006607851,0.021244956,0.005713779,0.007465474,0.00057308754,0.6903723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19085245,0.30941543,0.0007790624,0.00046065028,0.012274953,0.000119563636,0.0017096073,0.00029349275,0.4840948],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98814046,0.00073547923,0.002393626,0.0015886172,0.003500291,0.0036415502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99408376,0.0007273594,0.0019457374,0.0010110991,0.0008187103,0.0014133091],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013626989,0.0015221558,0.0033362804,0.00039990467,0.0012418139,0.0003468168,0.0021559857,0.0020969296,0.0023681005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010325784,0.0013055681,0.0013041926,0.0015190009,0.0024974847,0.0006583125,0.0004855314,0.0018576522,0.00014180913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007389937,0.0010251553,0.21380925,0.0025154913,0.0021852825,0.00019758698,0.023889754,0.000021346652,0.000021947739,0.0030857262,0.7328219,0.01968761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016244939,0.00022915508,0.056402426,0.0019577777,0.0005861576,0.00000771737,0.0040894477,0.00000854483,0.00002682369,0.00014163075,0.93350625,0.0014195471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11402943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3129453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20627746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026579592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027617374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246588091","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226474.003.0003","title":"2 Canada: From Privy Council to Supreme Court","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Originalism; Constitutionality; Statutory interpretation; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Presumption; Statute; Supreme court; Legislative history; Charter; Parliament; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05400134769111276,"score_gpt":0.23850797413471092,"score_spread":0.18450662644359817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246588091","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003793122,0.00014749989,0.000034652116,0.0005996503,0.00066645676,0.00079071824,0.0007513736,0.00014157745,0.99648875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00057821843,0.0002121571,0.000289768,0.00047552754,0.00062470685,0.000001564215,0.000047312027,0.000028197805,0.99774253],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644774,0.000113455644,0.00021582203,0.00057202927,0.001953406,0.00069757405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787545,0.00028185963,0.00020455828,0.00033588725,0.00080794067,0.00049430045],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037186092,0.00038517208,0.00052816997,0.000044176344,0.001259108,0.00008108158,0.0010395136,0.00049404503,0.000116944066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014168968,0.00041806366,0.00016017182,0.000032484768,0.00044887976,0.00010478891,0.0004960814,0.00049289863,0.0000044818794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009026554,0.000012760941,0.000040276955,0.000024548011,0.0003120936,0.00020900818,0.0121541545,0.0000064669503,0.0000041795106,0.09435277,0.8911069,0.0016865841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029139814,0.000018250266,0.00018278285,0.000087040135,0.00014933656,1.8112517e-7,0.0017611104,0.0000013777974,0.000009913178,0.00008552876,0.9968905,0.00052257755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96436435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9853069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.105783604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0141312815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007910358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246673257","doi":"10.29173/alr95","title":"Introduction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.02469429660280269,"score_gpt":0.31149882489275854,"score_spread":0.28680452828995584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246673257","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030933535,0.07510112,0.0000023204539,0.38396817,0.00076182943,0.0014647661,4.489637e-7,0.00008476941,0.53552324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4094353,0.39001426,0.0009577199,0.033525586,0.0074224565,0.0009527632,0.000027441934,0.000044131335,0.15762036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990704,0.00017324818,0.00016855687,0.00016885214,0.00019543048,0.00022352044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994771,0.000119977354,0.00006181535,0.00013940905,0.00012193577,0.00007979195],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026038013,0.000083734165,0.00019688986,0.000003934569,0.00049900095,0.00005147012,0.00014794574,0.000038217506,0.0065461546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005870476,0.000059130576,0.00007960399,0.0001588119,0.00021154698,0.00034428103,0.00003430054,0.000073747724,0.005725992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.7726216e-7,0.000019119594,0.00016272838,0.00024188432,0.000026886439,1.6992972e-7,0.0015757754,8.327981e-8,0.000015753716,0.53571445,0.44281346,0.01942945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002700451,0.0000051773322,0.00037703212,0.00016196302,0.000024242787,3.7565985e-7,0.00012250622,3.0880133e-7,0.0000054001457,0.0003340676,0.99885267,0.000089267494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19670668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025240747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5560392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007327126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011704627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99504817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246688545","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316403594","title":"Is Killing People Right?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Ideal (ethics); Abortion; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.026967503562718896,"score_gpt":0.24628355659926518,"score_spread":0.21931605303654628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246688545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018846159,0.0002623956,0.000072519426,0.00064610195,0.0006407694,0.0005361665,0.00028804355,0.0002635373,0.997102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00073684636,0.0008393307,0.000055870012,0.00015695096,0.00083723705,0.0000016757948,0.000016857886,0.000030916057,0.9973243],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978251,0.00017639062,0.00018383951,0.00057813316,0.0006354456,0.0006011031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853426,0.00024172629,0.00026404008,0.00033576693,0.00034619877,0.00027799714],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020746584,0.00036840496,0.0005105133,0.00008297825,0.0017350155,0.00009230658,0.00082446914,0.00056385715,0.00005747101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046651636,0.00032727985,0.0003524009,0.000024008945,0.0007638838,0.00018922516,0.00042521104,0.00038592712,0.0001387671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017131606,0.0000072998805,0.00001612662,0.000044962355,0.00016738099,0.000052656127,0.004923233,8.841188e-8,0.000007055244,0.44707635,0.5471801,0.00050760346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000324033,0.000013332917,0.00006428065,0.00018878066,0.00016094263,6.39308e-7,0.0008941847,0.000001577837,0.00005273247,0.000019716434,0.99778265,0.00049710565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005308912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003179274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45060256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014908412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000403125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246908656","doi":"10.1017/9781780688480.008","title":"Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Intersentia eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Federalism; Federalist; Political science; Jurisdiction; Legislature; Criminal jurisdiction; Separation of powers; State (computer science); Charter","score_opus":0.026237041538020905,"score_gpt":0.26569745161836567,"score_spread":0.23946041008034477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246908656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010260159,0.00022304918,0.0000022231245,0.0014208308,0.0025889436,0.00039781348,0.00005392329,0.00006957758,0.995141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06372547,0.0000384647,0.000021027463,0.0006414468,0.0005475094,0.0000053724166,0.000009474298,0.000034948986,0.9349763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983424,0.000032278665,0.00026182027,0.00033904923,0.0006487424,0.0003756932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919015,0.000095492454,0.00019270569,0.00022249749,0.00016501104,0.00013412506],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001138846,0.00028632767,0.00036253766,0.00003436822,0.0003853832,0.00008079262,0.00038146312,0.00026518307,0.0017012834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039347728,0.0002581509,0.0002031624,0.0000065074582,0.00036502277,0.000036010988,0.00016310482,0.0003587447,0.00054065353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010149457,0.000003203814,0.000024577166,0.00003911195,0.00041056183,0.000070845694,0.0075396635,3.9648228e-7,0.00001540472,0.65072376,0.33502415,0.006138188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000880647,0.000008937658,0.000017606404,0.00012540135,0.000059398448,7.3146055e-7,0.0012873324,5.232801e-7,0.000014205976,0.0009339951,0.99713916,0.00032465073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9038686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9859941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66211504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009202612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012686542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246967681","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u180165","title":"MacKeigan, Hon. Ian Malcolm, (11 April 1915–1 May 1996), Supernumerary Justice of Appeal Division of Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, 1985–90 (Chief Justice of Nova Scotia and Chief Justice of Appeal Division of Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, 1973–85)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Appeal; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Law; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03925478001180984,"score_gpt":0.3139855815065919,"score_spread":0.2747308014947821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246967681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9385101,0.01673991,0.0005505523,0.0008432128,0.0048315004,0.0038983237,0.0060733287,0.00010640712,0.028446624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98172075,0.011361294,0.0029489028,0.000083024985,0.001003667,0.000007094091,0.000602528,0.00020830557,0.0020644378],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829926,0.0011565019,0.005725529,0.0020358087,0.0059918547,0.0020977007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98528564,0.0021564797,0.0061743623,0.0016993553,0.003931696,0.0007524436],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004089817,0.0019195144,0.0062947106,0.001173723,0.0005486897,0.00008098077,0.0029000905,0.0021672093,0.00070334756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024407026,0.0017483359,0.0012861693,0.0027110283,0.007511136,0.00092497247,0.0020006432,0.0017995718,0.000033825236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0051088426,0.011062749,0.50720376,0.19849753,0.007909893,0.00012823397,0.10142629,0.001442432,0.026231661,0.014931284,0.10774468,0.018312663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019942367,0.007094998,0.6860839,0.078443974,0.03335655,0.00006093435,0.10058799,0.0009558291,0.04457895,0.0005869032,0.01978568,0.00852193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20286912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07956851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17888016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049673504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013543084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247129288","doi":"10.1017/9780511984457.047","title":"XLI","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Quarter (Canadian coin); Beauty; Spring (device); Creatures; Chorus; Visual arts; Natural (archaeology); Art history; History; Archaeology; Engineering; Literature","score_opus":0.043369558225798785,"score_gpt":0.33181889357726474,"score_spread":0.28844933535146594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247129288","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[4.3253334e-7,0.00080484105,0.000007404681,0.0074340957,0.00039377826,0.00019722551,0.0000065925947,0.0005505389,0.9906051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00028680282,0.0007230147,0.00072658586,0.0005936414,0.0015316452,0.000008963285,0.0000032717664,0.000082695675,0.9960434],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999282,0.000050808576,0.00006128689,0.00016303736,0.00026416362,0.00017869132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997663,0.000024291168,0.00004885098,0.000057676538,0.000011610833,0.000091275724],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000047724585,0.00010547489,0.00016976446,0.00001355107,0.00018142248,0.00003616124,0.00018561586,0.00017689468,0.029584318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011670223,0.00007609848,0.00006637953,0.0000957812,0.00019943998,0.000017904486,0.000054381508,0.00009974408,0.0028863626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.3669666e-7,0.0000031785153,0.000041418025,0.0000061764863,0.000029119154,0.000001750337,0.0034797676,4.1094856e-9,6.3807914e-7,0.02209251,0.97324187,0.0011033366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036234764,0.0000033572524,0.000033306995,0.00001297907,0.000009656207,1.4221804e-8,0.003881302,1.1872921e-7,7.783328e-7,0.000040319643,0.9958598,0.0001221023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032598924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023143549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026697956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052282725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029957208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247833030","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u246120","title":"Yu, Rt Rev. Patrick Tin-Sik, (born 8 July 1951), a Suffragan Bishop of Toronto (Area Bishop of York-Scarborough), 2006–Jan. 2017","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tin; History; Art; Archaeology; Materials science; Metallurgy","score_opus":0.05116875827232603,"score_gpt":0.3225904178331207,"score_spread":0.27142165956079467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247833030","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009969085,0.09116224,0.000018342938,0.00071905856,0.003746333,0.001990441,0.001683046,0.00024443588,0.89046705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10416618,0.43169066,0.000936648,0.0003940462,0.007989744,0.00019654432,0.00063143385,0.00026968712,0.45372507],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914905,0.0006194889,0.0018980459,0.0013140661,0.0029075108,0.0017704176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939612,0.0008394747,0.0020779243,0.0011128717,0.001448734,0.0005597737],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017590905,0.0011395136,0.0027783923,0.00020015796,0.000986989,0.00019012218,0.002038268,0.0019600969,0.00093679066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013204075,0.0009664847,0.001031056,0.0010168176,0.0014660525,0.0005766974,0.00058754813,0.0011812655,0.00011207282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001243667,0.00035273025,0.006191099,0.0010007592,0.00074370747,0.000044020326,0.04087158,0.0000029326368,0.000013492367,0.00064156734,0.91426694,0.035746798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077140296,0.00020184655,0.0072369515,0.0016603319,0.00045877756,0.0000026669397,0.008205224,0.000004138056,0.00008018444,0.00006404938,0.9801984,0.0011160289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22757722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10151388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43674195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016959502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095981924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247836551","doi":"10.1177/1531244503252143","title":"Family/Child Judicial Dispute Resolution (JDR): An Overview of One Canadian Court’s Settlement Conference Approach to the Pretrial Resolution of Family and Child Welfare/Protection Matters","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Child protection; Dispute resolution; Law; Family court; Family law; Resolution (logic); Welfare; Political science; Child custody; Sociology; Psychology; Criminology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.11223655617372083,"score_gpt":0.3229660813699467,"score_spread":0.21072952519622587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247836551","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038276862,0.5894052,0.0032987066,0.23996662,0.0031108002,0.023472935,0.0014410713,0.0002421804,0.100785635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82709813,0.1665933,0.0012728979,0.004231859,0.00035505494,0.00028856532,0.00007384432,0.000030482232,0.00005586806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582314,0.0013220579,0.000785253,0.00051491364,0.0009765173,0.0005781393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983603,0.00005204702,0.0004461895,0.00039344098,0.00042694173,0.00032107654],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028995718,0.0003007652,0.000748064,0.00009493141,0.0016052858,0.000066780536,0.00040251558,0.00017623643,0.000023268942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050884107,0.00023422702,0.00016484976,0.0007304125,0.00042892585,0.00026426735,0.00008012839,0.0003494825,0.000008933333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007433411,0.002432687,0.002560361,0.02057766,0.0021414922,0.0000110033825,0.074127644,0.001112255,0.0017982794,0.49032176,0.22555427,0.17861925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006494283,0.00026380343,0.1021715,0.004503457,0.00034085618,0.000002443489,0.0049556033,0.00012946187,0.000012584884,0.0001051533,0.88637865,0.0004870574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27882722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10673365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7888213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000528274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023708871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248238039","doi":"10.5040/9781474202015.ch-008","title":"Canada : Application and Implications of the Doctrine of Common Law Aboriginal Customary Title","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Common law; History; Political science; Genealogy","score_opus":0.017014654814876642,"score_gpt":0.26856667292750763,"score_spread":0.251552018112631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248238039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012668739,0.00010114544,0.0000046924524,0.0024638767,0.00010390379,0.0001867489,0.00006360965,0.000013668664,0.99693567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58772415,0.00003325258,0.000060301434,0.00032028265,0.00026504736,0.000018673789,0.000019333509,0.0000132121595,0.41154578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994066,0.000020730602,0.00014823096,0.000104200655,0.00023583206,0.000084419255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999367,0.000082927356,0.00019923756,0.00016672352,0.00014763662,0.000036468235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017472815,0.000072673036,0.00014683434,0.000012080474,0.00023988671,0.00005779328,0.00024336178,0.00009342407,0.00005029735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025405958,0.000052762894,0.000036382837,0.000014369536,0.0003009801,0.000058441627,0.000059020214,0.00014840909,0.0000026063065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.130561e-7,0.0000012108463,0.000059683476,0.000016894204,0.000012890807,3.6438504e-8,0.00030777106,9.7719784e-8,0.000018512015,0.9439284,0.051823623,0.0038303335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030771767,0.0000021461938,0.0007714205,0.000027228154,0.000019816793,1.9216984e-7,0.000036839712,7.2396676e-7,0.000026819242,0.004848372,0.99417865,0.000057026784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5622518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73354053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94235504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010568439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002436023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4406632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248421674","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.12626","title":"Curtis, Most Rev. John Barry, (born 19 June 1933), Honorary Assistant, St Matthew’s Anglican Church, Ottawa, since 2008; Archbishop of Calgary, 1994–99; Metropolitan of Rupert’s Land, 1994–99","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Archbishop; Metropolitan area; History; Art; Theology; Archaeology; Classics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02782214721456786,"score_gpt":0.3053838903012935,"score_spread":0.2775617430867256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248421674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014369167,0.10280217,0.000089592264,0.0054922123,0.0040877853,0.0032774878,0.008450113,0.0004470869,0.8609844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.115396276,0.4245841,0.0032026256,0.001394686,0.007842003,0.00039343393,0.0038113727,0.00063501915,0.4427405],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98954666,0.001186719,0.0023045377,0.001560598,0.0031821677,0.0022192963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99400556,0.0011478784,0.0019156891,0.0012370974,0.0006507285,0.001043073],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001983157,0.0013513822,0.003287079,0.0005778392,0.0014161232,0.00017970949,0.002278378,0.001553655,0.0010272337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013334256,0.001141227,0.00091663207,0.0020727247,0.0037467617,0.00048506848,0.0007759274,0.0019187913,0.00005532261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019810296,0.0004581602,0.023741756,0.0013296216,0.0009790191,0.000104879626,0.007559047,0.000002172912,0.000041302264,0.006076235,0.9471242,0.012385514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001003381,0.00021804679,0.016019488,0.0018270804,0.00042572562,0.0000067615,0.0062131765,0.000011330578,0.000086292006,0.00026112102,0.9725999,0.0013276807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30874088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14019226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41824389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026243667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013685209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248931395","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u226214","title":"Grimmer, Hon. W. C. Hazen, (31 Oct. 1858–3 Oct. 1945), Judge, Court of Appeal and Chancery Court, New Brunswick, 1914; Court of Divorce and Matrimonial Causes, 1932","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.030735459742518526,"score_gpt":0.30570539162414617,"score_spread":0.27496993188162766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248931395","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28640306,0.35084468,0.00024953662,0.016933952,0.010790854,0.0069712927,0.0023844673,0.00061343977,0.32480875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1337444,0.65311813,0.0011490572,0.0006149818,0.008755466,0.000046183857,0.00036212074,0.00024314296,0.20196652],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935097,0.00032777002,0.0013952232,0.0012088487,0.0021107665,0.001447657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99597406,0.000630961,0.0014667755,0.00053495326,0.0006574602,0.0007358094],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012152639,0.0010081858,0.0025719923,0.0002877943,0.001114541,0.00022473872,0.000863147,0.0014159044,0.00012677588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044754095,0.0009114,0.00039182178,0.0006465318,0.002830146,0.00041102615,0.00066309917,0.0012071815,0.000024538633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031038883,0.00026963092,0.021157622,0.00203807,0.0011402258,0.000060938215,0.026944539,0.0000067657784,0.000039939896,0.0038905034,0.9178278,0.026313584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001898407,0.00027929703,0.039875496,0.0021944814,0.00070069835,0.0000129061245,0.005720528,0.000019675932,0.00012229261,0.0002999565,0.9475298,0.001346497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14087072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06673841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30227345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005305583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020399778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249105100","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.40948","title":"Exner, Most Rev. Adam, (born 24 Dec. 1928), Archbishop of Vancouver, (RC), 1991–2004, now Archbishop Emeritus","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Archbishop; Art; Classics","score_opus":0.04283209462957198,"score_gpt":0.3226834047575462,"score_spread":0.2798513101279742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249105100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037544288,0.048753776,0.000097812066,0.0017273503,0.013694253,0.002453112,0.0014336273,0.0005122704,0.9275734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008412965,0.24142152,0.0012912682,0.0008170864,0.006653834,0.0001909747,0.00078839605,0.00023257773,0.7401914],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98993284,0.0007789238,0.0017487993,0.0015837469,0.003518254,0.0024374225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943719,0.0010338404,0.0013429909,0.0010571792,0.001331451,0.00086265214],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017279481,0.0013060671,0.0025840767,0.00040622684,0.00168321,0.00024779965,0.002126622,0.0016828161,0.0009208537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002137445,0.0011438935,0.0008541802,0.0016522843,0.0024772093,0.0005244996,0.00078867475,0.0018605037,0.00018352235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089896,0.00022394197,0.001760592,0.0006450298,0.00046209272,0.00005336793,0.0088537615,0.000008392824,0.00000781991,0.00070254126,0.9370915,0.050101005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086193084,0.000121090394,0.0019409647,0.0019150187,0.00030664803,0.0000027975236,0.005395214,0.000007893887,0.00004966023,0.00049809576,0.98756224,0.0013384736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050363686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20669122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19266775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001599434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011392542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249151198","doi":"10.3138/tjt.34.2.311","title":"Toronto School of Theology Theses Completed Academic Year 2017–18","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Sociology; Mathematics education; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.060580314462321164,"score_gpt":0.37093291898398106,"score_spread":0.3103526045216599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249151198","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46530086,0.021215355,0.00028918308,0.0046326686,0.0034518356,0.00046729605,0.000016672802,0.00006705376,0.5045591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99084204,0.0027681284,0.0007776671,0.0002983436,0.0019292578,0.0000032814619,5.9476497e-7,0.000012629179,0.0033680259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973285,0.0009075624,0.00066372653,0.00018047213,0.00041512735,0.0005046002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974254,0.00057371974,0.00082275044,0.00019252594,0.00077203504,0.00021356935],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015441236,0.00018354818,0.00063803187,0.000026357244,0.00039887344,0.000013822516,0.0009263088,0.00032223755,0.022022035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017866716,0.00012946877,0.00020816199,0.00005458597,0.002269065,0.00055922294,0.00018519268,0.0003073774,0.000113862356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026970415,0.000451187,0.085684404,0.000060592618,0.002212764,0.000050969105,0.19216388,0.000012230924,0.01564457,0.51183826,0.17619528,0.012988816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005042353,0.004851782,0.29582456,0.00028811352,0.00061703834,0.00019242044,0.14950418,0.000037536844,0.0016025365,0.06425007,0.476556,0.0012334142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030304465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048766393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52554125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006700963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017703559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97887194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250215610","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u198616","title":"Jones, Rt Rev. Llewellyn, (11 Oct. 1840–9 Jan. 1918), Bishop of Newfoundland and Bermuda since 1878","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art history; History","score_opus":0.036385807036861645,"score_gpt":0.31553892994011706,"score_spread":0.27915312290325545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250215610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06800913,0.07177404,0.000020435084,0.005209204,0.0032648058,0.0018749327,0.0004636112,0.00025896746,0.84912485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04924684,0.37926993,0.00056402746,0.00056585134,0.004921307,0.00006391779,0.0002553243,0.00013002737,0.5649828],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99496543,0.00036280265,0.0009251508,0.0009690003,0.0016178364,0.0011597899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703985,0.00069011777,0.00075334636,0.0004968708,0.0005776169,0.00044218134],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010402338,0.0007360481,0.0016043294,0.00019796548,0.0014028278,0.00028463185,0.00083603483,0.001193113,0.0002874656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088077725,0.00060782855,0.00032672728,0.00073447765,0.0018547272,0.00036175558,0.00047176584,0.00089794205,0.000080581274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010336614,0.00024143502,0.06992936,0.0015841748,0.00073171937,0.00009542224,0.037511438,0.0000033774759,0.000012384858,0.01254231,0.8227775,0.054467488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052601635,0.00006879782,0.020061648,0.0012831662,0.0002044922,0.0000044310655,0.003702285,0.0000032531236,0.000009839796,0.00030957392,0.973057,0.00076949975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08346923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13103472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3074959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007798878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046562054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250264301","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2136","title":"Strange bedfellows","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Nothing; Framing (construction); Charter; Political science; Law; Legislation; Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.01679811731214948,"score_gpt":0.24698094369839,"score_spread":0.23018282638624052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250264301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092929445,0.0006361457,0.00037140632,0.0019813906,0.00038734145,0.00008938405,0.0000040880877,0.000035627636,0.90356517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99511355,0.00049308926,0.0013731152,0.000042353127,0.00024960242,1.3185593e-8,3.5298638e-7,0.00000236059,0.0027255844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992344,0.0001548674,0.000072708404,0.000072996794,0.00028211382,0.000182931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995122,0.000054042008,0.00009925165,0.00005298915,0.00014624435,0.00013526982],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037549651,0.00005596871,0.0001269699,0.000004772477,0.0015752442,0.000025802905,0.00026343166,0.000057161866,0.0018348391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040548788,0.000054001295,0.000106503496,0.000016692751,0.0003920821,0.00044697456,0.0000367196,0.00009343745,0.000017106158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012172295,0.00021826406,0.0074309194,0.00002745011,0.0003402196,0.00003671471,0.2744474,0.00004419737,0.00061862497,0.64054567,0.026033701,0.0501351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038975145,0.00005040278,0.0069759325,0.000015991523,0.000031765077,0.0000013678665,0.045855727,0.0000105668005,0.000012336205,0.00035800933,0.9462027,0.000095474774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29045784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5589228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.920169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032530673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021043887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250397760","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.246216","title":"Clarke, Rt Rev. Barry Bryan, (born 10 Oct. 1952), Bishop of Montreal, 2004–15","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Art","score_opus":0.038168024177992456,"score_gpt":0.3213080201447223,"score_spread":0.28313999596672984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250397760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035224638,0.047837157,0.0000148237705,0.00228581,0.0021601312,0.0011855005,0.00060168514,0.0002537913,0.9421386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006269436,0.16559684,0.0001601565,0.00039463962,0.0040966133,0.00007035289,0.00026197702,0.000099793964,0.8230502],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935447,0.000569741,0.0011703129,0.0010524894,0.0021633853,0.0014993674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996173,0.0006817235,0.0009300881,0.0007105035,0.0009775885,0.0005270799],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014032722,0.0008495039,0.0018639672,0.00024887043,0.0012466215,0.0002132974,0.0013509194,0.0018040485,0.0031063156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015887002,0.0007103208,0.0007080999,0.0009877252,0.0014144863,0.0003767545,0.0004115762,0.0013394105,0.0003885893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060074068,0.000111255504,0.001375667,0.00032749382,0.00034017247,0.000033653476,0.0064441455,0.0000024821932,0.0000018336923,0.00034853336,0.92941964,0.06153504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061603624,0.0000824281,0.011072311,0.0011543239,0.00024289054,0.0000014862374,0.0032247496,0.0000028845614,0.00001727557,0.00023316532,0.9825322,0.0008202254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062168833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058374297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.119088456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093594036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006984949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250566945","doi":"10.3138/9781487519117-003","title":"2 The Future of Constitutional Change in Canada: Examining Our Legal, Political, and Jurisprudential Straitjacket","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04240523165263207,"score_gpt":0.2630835621316267,"score_spread":0.22067833047899463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250566945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016207625,0.0050180014,8.73351e-7,0.00046310044,0.00051825575,0.00049107306,0.00032943924,0.000009589728,0.9915489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6985312,0.004101039,0.00007526031,0.00004752019,0.0006073183,7.905241e-7,0.000011192449,0.000011135398,0.29661453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889314,0.000056526304,0.0001476383,0.00018914217,0.00043557308,0.00027797275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993694,0.00009576065,0.00019365746,0.00010862741,0.00013932049,0.00009325447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013921056,0.00014597873,0.00030440168,0.000008842993,0.0004089538,0.000018136112,0.0003038012,0.00017500811,0.000045008816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011380945,0.00013167682,0.000057136705,0.0000011644559,0.0009803933,0.00012590455,0.00021264596,0.00016308951,3.7058626e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002783322,0.0000034974894,0.00018610538,0.000040726813,0.00007803034,0.000010897171,0.006184388,2.844768e-7,0.0000021229857,0.9902107,0.0009909034,0.0022644927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030497875,0.00002236562,0.0042814314,0.00012480131,0.0000637063,4.9724537e-7,0.014683406,0.0000018840559,0.000002894025,0.000058660025,0.98028755,0.00016782922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99015206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009789071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094042433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5369625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251419118","doi":"10.23943/princeton/9780691166483.003.0009","title":"Polygamy, Monogamy, and Marriage Justice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Princeton University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decriminalization; Supreme court; Variety (cybernetics); Economic Justice; Plural; Law; Criminology; Normative; Political science; Criminal justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.07965268196554509,"score_gpt":0.2816403960977065,"score_spread":0.20198771413216143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251419118","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019461842,0.00077689794,0.000014536773,0.00031471968,0.00033921158,0.0005384054,0.0000702748,0.00020299443,0.99754834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003823573,0.0016247893,0.0002716621,0.00004849493,0.0003650262,0.0000010044475,0.000006549504,0.000025935758,0.99383295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982354,0.00010995304,0.00016257273,0.00050317077,0.0005849551,0.00040393395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998717,0.00014278427,0.00022802266,0.00025542633,0.0002819617,0.00037478472],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003282804,0.00033748607,0.00043358246,0.00007106872,0.0010628821,0.00010030602,0.0005301736,0.00047360707,0.00007770888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080295016,0.0003560686,0.00011942852,0.000010118901,0.001029129,0.0001741075,0.0007994696,0.0004477931,0.000027158403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050200088,0.0000067575343,0.000012385447,0.000070005364,0.00013632826,0.00007200658,0.008661699,0.0000010620431,0.000004668048,0.98074687,0.0060611228,0.004176909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003891651,0.000024608516,0.00003762682,0.00007816695,0.0003854116,0.0000011313404,0.0018463033,0.0000044848393,0.000006693115,0.0012200311,0.99558073,0.00042566768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060938825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010210123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9895196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006163312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016206308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251449089","doi":"10.1353/utq.0.0322","title":"Engendering Legitimacy: Law, Property, and Early Eighteenth-Century Fiction (review)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Property (philosophy); Legal fiction; Law; Property law; Ideology; Real property; Sociology; History; Property rights; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.017497434047560108,"score_gpt":0.24257255574377906,"score_spread":0.22507512169621896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251449089","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2475716,0.13504942,0.00013862143,0.008105818,0.0005807774,0.0017474684,0.000018676914,0.00037121112,0.6064164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685716,0.029671067,0.0003995026,0.000091924434,0.00007532515,2.67112e-7,0.0000015470407,0.0000029553582,0.0011858077],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992165,0.0000926758,0.00009463384,0.00017499793,0.00022740712,0.00019378672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962676,0.000019538003,0.000078552126,0.00008399486,0.00009826937,0.00009290919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014144646,0.00009329596,0.00018481805,0.000007235237,0.0006010734,0.000019659712,0.00015122727,0.000056707348,0.00018815347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008585469,0.00007983205,0.00007116274,0.00002794318,0.00021029178,0.00066518545,0.000016024418,0.0000584373,0.0000066770513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010580299,0.00030943294,0.0016149306,0.00029185228,0.00019629662,0.000036319136,0.42560998,7.939827e-7,0.0010044358,0.035129998,0.03958103,0.49611914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000654041,0.0006834269,0.051459085,0.00031652587,0.00011126356,0.0000012230265,0.057087883,0.000010304583,0.000011066411,0.000056719895,0.88927466,0.00033382635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1299885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021643031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8496936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024476016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018097373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99620944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251474052","doi":"10.1093/obo/9780195399301-0399","title":"Anna Maria van Schurman","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Renaissance and Reformation","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Miracle; Sculpture; Painting; Kingdom; Art; Classics; Publishing; Art history; History; Literature; Humanities; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03601918876382249,"score_gpt":0.31182156177153586,"score_spread":0.2758023730077134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251474052","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005681254,0.012364381,0.00002391691,0.001965795,0.0014494766,0.0004927612,0.000048065544,0.00016659056,0.97780776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2611468,0.52930963,0.000542742,0.00035919435,0.008014588,0.000105013736,0.0006861183,0.00005152514,0.19978435],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837583,0.00013928123,0.00031021808,0.00026006842,0.00051628734,0.00039828615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991363,0.000032318065,0.00031441596,0.00015886551,0.00022970074,0.00012834524],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039605683,0.00023696182,0.0003318429,0.00007014383,0.0015640594,0.00017642156,0.00021429939,0.00048542136,0.00020948345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013307162,0.00016015951,0.00007905013,0.00019037482,0.00054206286,0.00066299475,0.00010095103,0.0003232618,0.0002978617],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014327884,0.00002097088,0.00037063373,0.00033116678,0.000078006175,0.0000014928065,0.018546464,2.7655958e-7,0.0000012125295,0.0029033078,0.8563742,0.12135791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014986422,0.00003288867,0.0029718492,0.00046078852,0.000034239543,9.758531e-7,0.0020863789,0.000009186681,0.00000830411,0.0006726246,0.9933062,0.00026669464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016267861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010485406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7780234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002808078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009864801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251700674","doi":"10.1353/cal.2001.0106","title":"Editor's Note","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Callaloo","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Repetition (rhetorical device); Quarter (Canadian coin); History; Baton rouge; Advice (programming); Classics; Art history; Computer science; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.025726408223159,"score_gpt":0.328606342510073,"score_spread":0.30287993428691395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251700674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21876709,0.001308145,0.0005028682,0.04546287,0.020591808,0.0006019716,0.000007673941,0.00069891877,0.71205866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95354134,0.0005150304,0.00052040734,0.0007287558,0.0205859,0.00001682614,0.0000023617674,0.000009927674,0.024079451],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902976,0.0000642347,0.000096503354,0.00014514763,0.0003527225,0.0003116407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995743,0.000089084984,0.000031061405,0.000085955035,0.000098881734,0.000120733064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000224488,0.000075877615,0.000105607905,0.000011855983,0.0006603242,0.00006276797,0.00019960283,0.00009015303,0.0004303288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037244044,0.00006133511,0.000059765003,0.00016023466,0.00024493784,0.00012217018,0.000047363872,0.00009807009,0.00065113953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018791476,0.00008615625,0.017849874,0.000008766128,0.000047242775,0.00004825683,0.04867159,0.000018237475,0.00040923912,0.01478834,0.8945805,0.023473028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010643056,0.000008438134,0.006885164,0.000004892458,0.000006203673,3.5957706e-7,0.0017745292,0.000008107094,0.0000149337375,0.00028837557,0.9908005,0.00010204975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038350173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002607686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73477423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016038043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003559792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8369298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251764200","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.1.93","title":"Redressing the Right Wrong: The Argument from Corrective Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Indigenous; Injustice; Economic Justice; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.022258492148469238,"score_gpt":0.2682911348908973,"score_spread":0.24603264274242806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251764200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2159215,0.012373758,0.00050354365,0.015333625,0.0041696676,0.00041551594,0.000024124303,0.000047556572,0.7512107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965931,0.0006063057,0.00038869833,0.00010466753,0.0007805995,7.80509e-8,4.889634e-7,0.000002676357,0.001523389],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876606,0.00040750878,0.000088299836,0.00007247775,0.00039765937,0.00026796912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910396,0.00034208302,0.00019477433,0.00009008099,0.00015538321,0.00011372247],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006293116,0.0000759107,0.000116923045,0.0000029549478,0.0058577,0.000060935738,0.00043370918,0.000051075618,0.0014999569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000081810234,0.00004330632,0.00010631489,0.000026221405,0.0007316932,0.00069610396,0.000104006846,0.0002016543,0.000014017553],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011782767,0.00016176689,0.004185916,0.000004991766,0.0004812226,0.000012102334,0.8648837,0.00003298977,0.00015043063,0.08522715,0.036517795,0.008224071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024150732,0.000015930638,0.029333571,0.000027538359,0.0002561441,0.0000023675464,0.39931,0.000010721722,0.000038658007,0.0002285287,0.5704445,0.00009051012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31348264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23898336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7806716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081156165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003386231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252067742","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.bkb_1.x","title":"Book Review","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marriage and the Family","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Sociology; Library science; Media studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.021177411157072834,"score_gpt":0.3018141870081191,"score_spread":0.28063677585104624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252067742","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008013386,0.89245486,0.000022213688,0.08000523,0.00034344711,0.00019030175,7.1242226e-7,0.0000071150853,0.018962726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08972594,0.8571828,0.00015762165,0.048959084,0.00082582183,0.0000032248615,1.1494497e-7,0.000005278365,0.003140123],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999154,0.00017161602,0.0002176091,0.00004451074,0.00029198427,0.00012030142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943584,0.00013945947,0.00019521169,0.00004751866,0.0001166981,0.00006527936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013477938,0.00005747725,0.00021641442,0.000010439192,0.00041359733,0.000038406946,0.00016163102,0.00002724862,0.00008360549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004614816,0.000027693406,0.000118522905,0.000073080424,0.000338899,0.0001832286,0.000030345298,0.00014544689,0.000011832471],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015112886,0.000056164874,0.00013524968,0.00016733959,0.00027491496,0.00007956519,0.033995092,0.000006995998,0.00010621459,0.025233744,0.92916805,0.010625564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010511029,0.000027234471,0.0014128967,0.00041266766,0.00007484543,0.000007404589,0.0026871124,9.750169e-8,0.0000053398717,0.0023436097,0.99192595,0.000051708204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005558813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003668693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08171255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054903223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053241914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3181098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252240964","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.287555","title":"Montreal, Bishop of, (Rt Rev. Mary Irwin-Gibson) (born 23 Oct. 1955)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.0349408320803442,"score_gpt":0.30947647849161314,"score_spread":0.27453564641126893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252240964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002820126,0.023048524,0.000010877733,0.0069280122,0.0029270463,0.0011734342,0.000961301,0.00027290906,0.9618578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00508952,0.28190392,0.00014966553,0.00030778212,0.0045820046,0.00011711276,0.00017211639,0.00008665643,0.70759124],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99447674,0.0006122083,0.0009187466,0.0009888387,0.0017225933,0.0012808626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99676985,0.0007072418,0.0008290535,0.0006814687,0.00059396384,0.00041842868],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007846136,0.0007689383,0.0016988291,0.00016569745,0.0011519302,0.00018073994,0.0013485041,0.0012429074,0.0020587542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010743727,0.0005406285,0.0006550681,0.0005399908,0.0012839556,0.00041104454,0.0005291539,0.00082192366,0.0010268799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036186553,0.00007894751,0.001534904,0.00031785577,0.0003314028,0.000024391527,0.0074688764,2.45044e-7,0.0000036769868,0.0012063854,0.8970005,0.09199663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004942764,0.00006782438,0.009178993,0.0018911441,0.00019716627,0.0000011149548,0.0022580829,0.0000011910099,0.000013923133,0.0007009104,0.98443085,0.000764529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026573464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015610582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2588554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008669781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000690251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252359161","doi":"10.3138/9781442619005-012","title":"10. DIY 101: The Constitutional Entrenchment of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Constitutional review; Constitution","score_opus":0.02220387339202916,"score_gpt":0.2152105931672671,"score_spread":0.19300671977523792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252359161","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000041962438,0.00087422744,0.000002211641,0.0005338146,0.0002012862,0.00035783983,0.0003505876,0.000006503211,0.99763155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.053092845,0.0002158973,0.000016570792,0.000010763779,0.00006113664,2.7542217e-7,0.0000017327819,0.000002021748,0.94659877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987186,0.000071102804,0.00016543601,0.0001489591,0.0007308953,0.00016500567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878657,0.00017835,0.00041417047,0.00021614946,0.00034859197,0.00005615633],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014190497,0.00013975588,0.00027682778,0.0000039591214,0.0005443804,0.000004450556,0.00067818083,0.00012278894,0.0024966302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035125384,0.00008515364,0.00017565352,0.0000011028868,0.003423755,0.000048999264,0.0002912385,0.00008096512,0.0000012540352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003885028,0.000008836328,0.000030488955,0.000029571469,0.00030380095,0.0000016121439,0.012105412,0.0000027362325,0.000021413676,0.9576019,0.029187743,0.0006676042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020083018,0.000013959762,0.00023427691,0.0001491367,0.00011215882,1.1951715e-7,0.0009417963,4.2777398e-7,0.00006805383,0.00021013532,0.99796623,0.00010286094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9437763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95993674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9687785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083592726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007775823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252865071","doi":"10.1093/obo/9780195399301-0429","title":"Margaret More Roper","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Renaissance and Reformation","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Erasmus+; Humanism; Piety; Vernacular; Classics; Wife; Hymn; Theology; Philosophy; Literature; Sociology; Art; Art history; The Renaissance","score_opus":0.03234334517254744,"score_gpt":0.3015038938059766,"score_spread":0.26916054863342914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252865071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006354919,0.020953055,0.000011982543,0.0053436393,0.001512149,0.00070371525,0.00007198737,0.00013246431,0.9649161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23527065,0.46019015,0.00017203328,0.00045904107,0.0023737543,0.00007369266,0.0006072719,0.000039743587,0.30081365],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854064,0.00009723183,0.0002609738,0.0002366861,0.00052689656,0.0003375924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993215,0.000035611945,0.00024198102,0.00015141378,0.00016178568,0.00008766557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002468774,0.00021822088,0.00034484718,0.000052020885,0.0007868884,0.00012924545,0.00018455384,0.00044897862,0.000091341615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008972011,0.00013738168,0.00008067119,0.00014208199,0.00027860556,0.00054862053,0.000086211876,0.00034676903,0.00022590926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013726071,0.000019048384,0.00078586506,0.00060151785,0.00008469807,0.000001742628,0.030089857,0.000002830049,0.000001193525,0.001925656,0.8794425,0.087031335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001496471,0.000016333192,0.0031892876,0.0005033421,0.000029174911,8.33498e-7,0.0046807807,0.000011738103,0.0000044101594,0.000064526175,0.99110097,0.00024898243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019789361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045044444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66410244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029778847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009719988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6052189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253171590","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0001","title":"Introduction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Indigenous; Political science; Democracy; Law; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.03929021520453922,"score_gpt":0.2556821823605354,"score_spread":0.21639196715599618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253171590","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000018444493,0.00008011864,0.000010514152,0.0010564583,0.0007240272,0.00034376164,0.000032944517,0.00015220555,0.99758154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00043614855,0.0012363137,0.00009760815,0.000017306731,0.00184427,5.4756623e-7,0.000012035536,0.000017365011,0.9963384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881524,0.000046069545,0.00010094511,0.00037727985,0.00037930327,0.000281179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990076,0.000037672486,0.00027320857,0.00035393413,0.00019997233,0.00012763173],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015479833,0.00022663255,0.00028969973,0.00004681548,0.0023498724,0.00011247829,0.0006030736,0.0004012399,0.0001924342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047047197,0.00023955002,0.00018686004,0.0000022607205,0.00090081716,0.00018624373,0.00029614876,0.00034681967,0.000009274995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022934413,0.0000033816439,0.00000202897,0.000014039829,0.00010926183,0.000021658909,0.0030138067,5.3864125e-7,0.0000019318002,0.9561946,0.031135224,0.00948062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015944905,0.0000151518825,0.000015383204,0.00003346892,0.000119144934,4.3285996e-7,0.00057767215,5.521865e-7,0.0000057408934,0.00069183146,0.9980972,0.0002839841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002324985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013841019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.966962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004692765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008059684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99894893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253535235","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.18712","title":"Souliere v. Casino Niagara2014 CarswellOnt 3908, 2014 OnSC 1915, 239 A.C.W.S. (3d) 266 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, March 25, 2014)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Humanities; Law; Art","score_opus":0.024040022461297772,"score_gpt":0.2767443486285625,"score_spread":0.25270432616726474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253535235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74065626,0.1208654,0.00006733064,0.011367427,0.00212597,0.0025456438,0.00015311199,0.00015076742,0.12206811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74270225,0.24270809,0.0028488913,0.0033962673,0.0009473037,0.00010024329,0.00004903138,0.00006596771,0.0071819867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787366,0.00022883897,0.00067552755,0.00048131307,0.0001615148,0.0005791267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867153,0.00027851638,0.00032992146,0.00033301985,0.00014352798,0.00024347949],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014929832,0.0003067823,0.0010007843,0.000027605018,0.0008993831,0.00011079674,0.0003543194,0.00017727971,0.00042547812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017677319,0.00027087587,0.000200254,0.000056454508,0.00073511014,0.00030082688,0.0001762721,0.00026521832,0.00019989895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111848436,0.0005302902,0.13135485,0.018239468,0.0015196076,0.000026329262,0.077483125,0.00018729166,0.00015233037,0.41432616,0.28602886,0.07003984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029832002,0.00005066671,0.005254268,0.00033894897,0.00049458945,0.000005947213,0.00070508977,0.000044160253,0.000008233322,0.00017300164,0.9922429,0.00038391005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11646283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24372004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.706214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003687102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013307689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253849760","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u7750","title":"Blackwell, Rt Rev. Douglas Charles, (3 June 1938–25 May 2022), an Area (formerly Suffragan) Bishop of Toronto (Area Bishop of Trent-Durham), 1988–2003","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Cartography; Geography","score_opus":0.04185462168732683,"score_gpt":0.3173149805130908,"score_spread":0.275460358825764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253849760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046520207,0.1318046,0.000021644655,0.0024217933,0.010909003,0.003712954,0.0031431415,0.0004318274,0.8010348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022180375,0.4580267,0.00036445085,0.00028902688,0.003674198,0.00014631092,0.0014097795,0.00019974555,0.5137094],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99038947,0.0007038515,0.0021699632,0.0015611581,0.0031273232,0.002048258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99367124,0.00046869527,0.0019537178,0.00126486,0.001811703,0.0008297843],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018751444,0.0013998649,0.0031045086,0.00027999116,0.0011461988,0.00023855938,0.0021462913,0.0021231235,0.003882295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011518821,0.0011774789,0.00084722176,0.0014035435,0.0020962977,0.001218561,0.00047764432,0.0013544434,0.000081971775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020122391,0.0006970731,0.003627586,0.0011241293,0.0009079702,0.00004734971,0.051534966,0.0000035179087,0.000041594605,0.0023260817,0.88126993,0.058218595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010247679,0.00036682034,0.0042548315,0.0020810603,0.00045082622,0.0000038224716,0.02365358,0.0000135701575,0.00015378305,0.00007661028,0.9665293,0.0013910373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17153169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28643504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32622212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021255862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010940087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253864082","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u213941","title":"McPhillips, Captain Hon. Albert Edward; Hon. Mr Justice McPhillips, (21 March 1861–24 Jan. 1938), KC; FRES; one of His Majesty’s Justices of the Court of Appeal, British Columbia, since 1913; late President of the Council in the Government of the Province of British Columbia; Attorney-General, 1903; first elected to Provincial Parliament, 1898","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Appeal; Economic Justice; Art; Law; Cartography; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.025328060834262117,"score_gpt":0.245534927785302,"score_spread":0.2202068669510399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253864082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94994724,0.012594422,0.0000071939594,0.003276907,0.0017628021,0.009771191,0.010135634,0.000034018547,0.012470567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8951681,0.032219727,0.00018110065,0.00031836116,0.0008080535,0.00035411344,0.00004216399,0.00011786535,0.07079051],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98418224,0.0018234567,0.0028666027,0.0011247393,0.008695928,0.0013070095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898582,0.001520641,0.004499554,0.0014659932,0.0024438177,0.0002117879],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036266933,0.00063388277,0.0023985875,0.000048875638,0.001118473,0.00029818655,0.0043229256,0.0008479984,0.00014388734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004294679,0.00059567083,0.0008125965,0.0017249602,0.0040512704,0.00024763469,0.0015948224,0.0012818769,0.0000013816388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003847524,0.0030727447,0.11074909,0.012523493,0.0014420673,0.000030080828,0.031716872,0.00057914294,0.0005686214,0.00021675699,0.83003783,0.008678565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022949218,0.00067197473,0.6436065,0.01721596,0.002550925,0.000012318592,0.01232727,0.00008751752,0.0005085226,0.00015020616,0.3192784,0.0012955453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9098337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9878843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53285736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030723382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048643923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254068021","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.33891","title":"Morgan, Most Rev. Thomas Oliver, (born 20 Jan. 1941), Archbishop of Saskatoon and Metropolitan of the Ecclesiastical Province of Rupert’s Land, 2000–03; Interim Rector and Dean, St John’s Cathedral, Saskatoon, 2006–07 and 2011–12","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Archbishop; Metropolitan area; Interim; History; Classics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.030488918802679517,"score_gpt":0.2942868236882268,"score_spread":0.2637979048855473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254068021","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82033336,0.07139639,0.000024633027,0.0026034913,0.0009688208,0.0031543083,0.0047135977,0.00009433558,0.096711084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75819165,0.11062409,0.0012869628,0.00036402594,0.0013137568,0.00007273974,0.00014608387,0.00020405621,0.12779666],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955604,0.00064696337,0.001085172,0.00078332884,0.0011240479,0.0008000658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99682844,0.00079867267,0.0009003159,0.00048183103,0.0005889803,0.00040175326],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010305437,0.0006456305,0.0016721813,0.00017306149,0.0005706042,0.00010531913,0.0006738058,0.0006819903,0.00016273021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011174837,0.0004291938,0.00019427449,0.00034821779,0.0042813825,0.0002939826,0.0007059667,0.0007529866,0.000004544428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009077038,0.0011041169,0.29624504,0.005776392,0.0020660348,0.000070571274,0.06400386,0.0000017342127,0.0003471675,0.005380707,0.5962018,0.02789492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032521337,0.0013798323,0.33178735,0.0059149577,0.0014653371,0.00004117248,0.03677753,0.00003827799,0.00092879264,0.00050649606,0.6157722,0.0021359478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047236893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14462762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097390726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058733736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084760226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254174589","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14712","title":"Chippewas of Mnjikaning First Nation v. Ontario, <i>[2010] O.J. No. 2360 (Can.)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Political science; Volume (thermodynamics); Humanities; Library science; Media studies; Law; Art; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Physics","score_opus":0.03524059886939603,"score_gpt":0.25720224268264835,"score_spread":0.2219616438132523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254174589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.869606,0.00980747,0.00000286062,0.007613035,0.0017646615,0.0007389171,0.00001971742,0.00006165163,0.11038566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9399985,0.05212684,0.0019255765,0.0018769781,0.0004846469,0.00003758734,0.00001540411,0.000018936626,0.0035154992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923134,0.00002731742,0.00029129707,0.00018480883,0.000060268634,0.00020494129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943626,0.000088573994,0.00019801762,0.00011343896,0.00008594696,0.000077741905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055549096,0.000111211324,0.0003294104,0.000010318063,0.0005913707,0.00004939169,0.00013899448,0.00008089031,0.00017816482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018335707,0.000099345874,0.00007546321,0.000041787156,0.00026581972,0.00021327956,0.000063318636,0.00017305225,0.00003525149],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018958752,0.00018976485,0.066331826,0.00409783,0.00038817764,0.0000024347696,0.06900094,0.000017907947,0.0005913083,0.80081993,0.011637712,0.046903197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012284218,0.000013985944,0.004090039,0.00020481851,0.00006237264,9.16932e-7,0.0001882752,0.000008062381,0.00003282864,0.00034725873,0.99476004,0.00016856045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15783559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7404369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98312235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011166032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047376572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8477725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254291686","doi":"10.1163/1877-5888_rpp_sim_02729","title":"Canadian Conference of Bishops","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Religion Past and Present","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bishops; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.03397561908119253,"score_gpt":0.30441610412947,"score_spread":0.2704404850482775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254291686","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006153662,0.0021880239,0.0000016776241,0.0110340025,0.00069117104,0.0005093915,0.9731128,0.000022174681,0.011825359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05942541,0.04929827,0.00005405389,0.00060230994,0.0026151396,0.00007134796,0.88358253,0.00002016648,0.004330788],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879277,0.00016142864,0.00019577035,0.00021188203,0.00034100618,0.00029717362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999122,0.00011599845,0.00013548072,0.00016275594,0.00018202307,0.00028171108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025409053,0.00014689929,0.00029277723,0.00006310125,0.00038511615,0.00007547641,0.00025556725,0.0002585915,0.00013532759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015120911,0.000117368654,0.000059975562,0.000093980445,0.00030318333,0.000044857967,0.000086231325,0.00017918082,0.000051349325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002562804,0.0000058073733,0.00023493737,0.000052121875,0.0000249749,0.0000020632997,0.0008716175,4.4714204e-7,6.0130236e-7,0.00042956238,0.9979794,0.00039590485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007063847,0.0000189336,0.0004590627,0.00007238419,0.000032529562,3.1434186e-7,0.00034661542,0.0000013576841,0.0000019276297,0.0001838739,0.9986668,0.00014554906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92422616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8448157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08953032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011362351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020224245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47861546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254532483","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198264682.001.0001","title":"A Question of Autonomy?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Tort; Criminal law; Law; Childbirth; Intervention (counseling); Autonomy; Medicine; Political science; Psychology; Liability; Nursing; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.0110051208663158,"score_gpt":0.21493549200847958,"score_spread":0.20393037114216378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254532483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013127816,0.0004698348,0.000006817577,0.004813175,0.0004047442,0.000830521,0.000545267,0.00080576516,0.9908111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004167859,0.001656603,0.0004653362,0.00015334848,0.00048780377,0.0000025161182,0.00069597125,0.000087037086,0.9922835],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964598,0.000313027,0.00058173895,0.00084032846,0.00095349684,0.00085159956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782985,0.00033602043,0.0006116413,0.0005333883,0.00020808242,0.00048102866],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023199295,0.00067827065,0.0010611062,0.00041032347,0.0009322922,0.00021201311,0.001347053,0.0009830457,0.0046369852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012123342,0.0007337051,0.0007088054,0.0006036606,0.0017969392,0.003017819,0.00047178622,0.0006540494,0.00043422234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014815794,0.00018154955,0.0007847962,0.00014716663,0.00044228084,0.000116642295,0.008764801,0.000011125888,0.0000040492714,0.28192556,0.69769806,0.009775832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039976378,0.00007358183,0.0005022962,0.00029078528,0.00015672846,6.574463e-7,0.0010670364,0.0000025007907,0.000039296265,0.011463495,0.9852022,0.0008016898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011817213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014823975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28750414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011051001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002944098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254583539","doi":"10.7202/1027314ar","title":"Gérald-A. Beaudoin, La Constitution du Canada, 3 édition, La Collection Bleue, Série Traités, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2004, 1522 pages, ISBN 2-89127-638-8 Henri Brun, Chartes des droits de la personne. Législation, Jurisprudence et Doctrine, 16 édition, Collection Alter Ego, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2003, 1303 pages, ISBN 2-89127-611-6 Jacques Deslauriers, Loi sur la faillite et l’insolvabilité, 4 édition, Collection Alter Ego, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2004, 1100 pages, ISBN 2-89127-643-4 Rachel Grondin, Les infractions contre la personne et contre les biens, 5 édition, Collection Bleue, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2003, 194 pages, ISBN 2-89127-613-2","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art history; Art","score_opus":0.014230309132217362,"score_gpt":0.24826958673647756,"score_spread":0.2340392776042602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254583539","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33644986,0.38212982,0.041482527,0.14050655,0.011161358,0.025223047,0.018848257,0.0068408432,0.037357744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28367847,0.54798555,0.008340654,0.0033112983,0.0042932658,0.0047755386,0.016848058,0.0011218494,0.1296453],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9664943,0.013028396,0.0055340175,0.0054933815,0.004218901,0.005230979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97602874,0.0059741186,0.004914763,0.0024206666,0.008175022,0.0024867149],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008804534,0.004498653,0.004714936,0.0022808039,0.015074053,0.004103266,0.0017492467,0.0048595415,0.0021229174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009491704,0.005563502,0.001877819,0.01118018,0.006256977,0.009271078,0.00050173636,0.006003924,0.00038280504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018581335,0.0040872945,0.010939885,0.001373864,0.0022230453,0.00053285365,0.01890922,0.019090056,0.0029619911,0.009472716,0.9259221,0.0026288182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01355859,0.00095184584,0.017024342,0.003934616,0.002890761,0.0037509366,0.012817296,0.0020729464,0.0006420504,0.005165748,0.9313143,0.0058765984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7138625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91067237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19680987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019512136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073357304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255530224","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.27277","title":"Mercer, Rev. Mgr Robert William Stanley, (born 10 Jan. 1935), Diocesan Bishop, Anglican Catholic Church of Canada, 1989–2005 (Assistant Bishop, 1988–89)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Theology; Gerontology; Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026232119137664257,"score_gpt":0.2966238239852705,"score_spread":0.2703917048476062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255530224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039141674,0.052196886,0.000010659759,0.0065153386,0.0036577533,0.0024791076,0.0037158534,0.0003416125,0.89194113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.068623185,0.13434127,0.0002852304,0.00080973445,0.005258405,0.00023071839,0.00073948916,0.0002857771,0.7894262],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882478,0.00077955174,0.001885902,0.0017302127,0.004289734,0.0030667707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99408597,0.0006952622,0.0015291505,0.0011957742,0.0012161253,0.0012777159],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019361731,0.0014682672,0.0028762985,0.00041603096,0.00240518,0.0003497859,0.002235379,0.0015825632,0.0021913673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012873174,0.001256867,0.0007493285,0.0018244234,0.0019433543,0.00043317667,0.00059353054,0.0018531453,0.000052716947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108473185,0.00022739437,0.002263108,0.0006999255,0.0007309712,0.00013803244,0.02141457,0.000008656189,0.00001674602,0.00083162833,0.9437031,0.029857399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007060486,0.00010077846,0.018744258,0.0013491993,0.0003435798,0.0000036618842,0.0052674706,0.0000043280706,0.000056889727,0.000055061715,0.97187346,0.0014952818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8489259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9665201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11759419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052183066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052206013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256397086","doi":"10.1177/0067205x1304100106","title":"Considering Canadian Approaches to Equality in the Context of Constitutional Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Project commissioning; Political science; Sociology; Geography; Media studies; Publishing; Ethnology; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.16254608544722277,"score_gpt":0.33825860967231586,"score_spread":0.1757125242250931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256397086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80291206,0.0386316,0.000020238896,0.045956176,0.0001778875,0.0036718477,0.00021134451,0.000022305816,0.10839655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954643,0.002858806,0.00023934167,0.0012902826,0.000033345186,0.000087287655,0.0000070414044,0.0000014474266,0.000018117416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990149,0.000262056,0.00025647867,0.00011173418,0.00018770718,0.00016713084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946314,0.00023288881,0.00007909945,0.000050069495,0.000099362325,0.00007544716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005893119,0.00007630609,0.00025532738,0.000012283695,0.00030851716,0.000042452302,0.00008667829,0.000035501755,0.00021915234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023855305,0.000049756844,0.00004153553,0.000091378155,0.00068054855,0.0001466685,0.000011656457,0.0000669363,0.00000846738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002976663,0.000026014624,0.010980208,0.00088776724,0.000028646798,7.8165124e-7,0.016903093,6.0868587e-7,0.000012500638,0.9625339,0.001724172,0.0068993317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010918013,0.0001636178,0.20211133,0.009429612,0.00016495424,0.00001471398,0.09588222,0.0000082258875,0.0001410718,0.011912348,0.6780894,0.0009907143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6579938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82803637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95062155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006332877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018526881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34428367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256695152","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.18812","title":"Lake Louise Limited Partnership v. Canad Corp. of Manitoba Ltd. <i>[2014] M.J. No. 171, 2014 MBCA 61, 2014 MB.C. Lexis 172 (Manitoba Court of Appeal, June 13, 2014)</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Lexis; General partnership; Political science; Download; Library science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03139974770948781,"score_gpt":0.2670107917707297,"score_spread":0.23561104406124192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256695152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46596673,0.2894437,0.000095419055,0.021549996,0.005550888,0.005850295,0.0009851928,0.00040106426,0.2101567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6139288,0.37599918,0.0009204493,0.0042857993,0.0014945529,0.00010978597,0.00017629043,0.00009519318,0.0029899306],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710214,0.00036346473,0.001038584,0.0005603298,0.00023367886,0.00070180185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752086,0.00038375336,0.00092554465,0.00047657953,0.00036359896,0.00032967594],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018970211,0.00041627017,0.0013483363,0.00004727096,0.0007314711,0.00010759844,0.0005216322,0.00021086232,0.00026774497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028375143,0.000374735,0.00027339355,0.000108141205,0.0011597354,0.00034576972,0.00018381377,0.00024784566,0.00031111442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005090076,0.00020513775,0.035185613,0.0042675906,0.00049326516,0.0000031662812,0.0026467093,0.000037336195,0.000075043055,0.04866825,0.89872736,0.009639641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044796325,0.00007362555,0.002112575,0.0005827359,0.00031224734,0.0000021202013,0.00085417024,0.0000482878,0.000042383755,0.0002586616,0.9947827,0.00048254072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10339971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58611774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48271805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017687744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013527591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281967755","doi":"10.21991/cf29445","title":"The Paradox of Political Questions in Canadian Aboriginal Law: Why Dickson v Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation Requires Reconsideration of the Political Questions Doctrine in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Doctrine; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.022137118956822677,"score_gpt":0.2900613215639113,"score_spread":0.2679242026070886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281967755","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.315283,0.0021230157,0.00066342985,0.58035284,0.0062904935,0.0034747722,0.002856052,0.00009236853,0.08886405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982353,0.000053868054,0.00008224685,0.0012014606,0.000087620894,0.00022394699,0.000044405577,0.000005441348,0.000065710745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961685,0.000512907,0.0008878287,0.000330947,0.0009257789,0.0011740385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978657,0.00093523983,0.00023145086,0.00025050392,0.0003924116,0.0003246885],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008636923,0.00021814955,0.00032314335,0.00017948424,0.005395794,0.000060657145,0.00046942345,0.00010750933,0.00010677682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00192537,0.00017323365,0.00013116215,0.0008014157,0.006257959,0.00040541062,0.00012454762,0.0005381422,0.0000026989296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002173877,0.000058209218,0.12460811,0.0000088800825,0.000021535518,0.000009877607,0.0002996683,0.0025102845,0.000010815003,0.87146777,0.0009355704,0.000047561465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020181534,0.00009148371,0.105035864,0.0004331708,0.000094248666,0.00010874381,0.049882684,0.0018375394,0.00016937972,0.20000997,0.63949656,0.0008221934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99836725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99986726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6829523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008004475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021020593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99644643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283331183","doi":"10.3138/utq.91.2.01","title":"Law as a Mediating Institution of History: The Approach and Strategy of Harold Innis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Law; Civilization; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Legal history; Environmental ethics; Political science; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024044792620234574,"score_gpt":0.2321423338144626,"score_spread":0.20809754119422802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283331183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8699914,0.0013074806,0.000020732681,0.0003440038,0.00010014582,0.00022550805,0.000019731631,0.00001532936,0.12797564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99927115,0.00003525667,0.0001621193,0.000011917508,0.000015539285,4.289165e-7,0.0000020746284,0.0000013023798,0.0005001805],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928415,0.00017169838,0.00008681131,0.00009194953,0.00027735642,0.000088010296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996097,0.000051420167,0.00017291351,0.00006623452,0.00007180022,0.00002789424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002810906,0.000047320766,0.00013530863,0.0000074104237,0.0005635489,0.000003052643,0.00019246666,0.000028360053,0.00018070368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014580473,0.00004287378,0.000045348115,0.0000306126,0.00075731496,0.00022881008,0.00004381314,0.000059601192,2.68416e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055356453,0.00010298331,0.0011456601,0.000040776747,0.00007762475,0.0000013310171,0.8081732,0.00003584277,0.0009783229,0.18277498,0.0007495628,0.0058643995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048161746,0.0004429971,0.014047669,0.0000075510443,0.000058280497,4.0868653e-7,0.9150369,0.00008501952,0.000017831779,0.00016170811,0.06955646,0.0001035319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5364192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06728094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46913823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048224497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007925242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94973874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284692863","doi":"10.3390/rel13070628","title":"Inspiring Intergenerational Relationships: Aging and the New Testament from One Historian’s Perspective","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religions","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Meaning (existential); New Testament; Storytelling; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Nature versus nurture; Old Testament; Grandparent; Diversity (politics); Power (physics); Reading (process); Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Narrative; Aesthetics; Psychology; Epistemology; Literature; Theology; Philosophy; Linguistics; History; Developmental psychology; Art; Anthropology","score_opus":0.053595826260462456,"score_gpt":0.3052803069414638,"score_spread":0.25168448068100135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284692863","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2941073,0.022268713,0.0009502103,0.6096479,0.0021268069,0.0012017109,0.0000565025,0.00029293835,0.069347896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943798,0.0005066957,0.0008108146,0.00031100988,0.0005759567,0.00007144798,0.0000059368567,0.000005288138,0.003333008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894536,0.00032022994,0.00012249952,0.00016299811,0.00032055136,0.0001283806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992461,0.00049280835,0.00006157306,0.00007469573,0.00006195255,0.00006286003],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003643024,0.0000620557,0.00009229437,0.000022661909,0.0044177854,0.00006120331,0.00011905108,0.000020804964,0.00013906701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000641552,0.000049340582,0.00004789568,0.00015702244,0.0002094534,0.000090724345,0.00015694596,0.00025918474,0.000009750546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014457968,0.00003028491,0.0029826076,6.880774e-7,0.00008074377,9.795391e-7,0.33043882,0.000280889,0.00009133482,0.62849295,0.037280906,0.00030535492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001126709,0.000025716385,0.01416377,0.000023473938,0.00009864013,8.196116e-7,0.18998171,0.0001892328,0.000015002726,0.09038642,0.7037335,0.00025497837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0091762915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70027256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011519192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011459405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285070302","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4124656","title":"Legislating Emotion, Reading Grief: Bereavement Leave for Miscarriage and Stillbirth in New Zealand Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Miscarriage; Grief; Reading (process); Psychology; Law; Psychoanalysis; Political science; Developmental psychology; Psychotherapist; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.01787594092474581,"score_gpt":0.2881690528571011,"score_spread":0.2702931119323553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285070302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9679801,0.0034887542,0.0005489741,0.019752042,0.0005738097,0.00097373844,0.000012340773,0.00006404772,0.006606188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877646,0.0009968056,0.00019275643,0.0001477216,0.00057975913,0.000019357769,0.0000035423163,0.000013582487,0.010281901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733907,0.0002210878,0.00027581037,0.00020876982,0.00038646173,0.0015688186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946845,0.00014388078,0.00017285907,0.000053530053,0.000053695367,0.00010761688],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026908896,0.0001245957,0.00019492643,0.000047796002,0.0023779825,0.00011562261,0.00017517501,0.00004059476,0.000042499447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017268951,0.00011302926,0.0000732141,0.0001702401,0.00009334628,0.00022895249,0.00008352892,0.0009344092,9.4854386e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085701366,0.000063230145,0.02099726,0.000010678916,0.00018278061,0.0000047609883,0.09892024,0.00022559566,0.0002684924,0.8592881,0.0016146909,0.01833848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038586822,0.00073688204,0.0049798773,0.000061697785,0.000068660855,0.00006915047,0.3315138,0.0001321487,0.00004382423,0.37272635,0.2852047,0.0006042323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01791261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08786957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48656175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002188623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008369489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285232348","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4140735","title":"Six Examples Applying the Meta-Principle Linguistic Method: Lessons for Indigenous Law Implementation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Ratification; Normative; Linguistics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.08940911779542297,"score_gpt":0.42348464015266085,"score_spread":0.33407552235723786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285232348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4944076,0.11508425,0.19285966,0.13107844,0.008863531,0.033998694,0.0007822777,0.0011985829,0.021726971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99427074,0.0008041169,0.0013490471,0.00034049695,0.00072507514,0.0014383367,0.000013048888,0.000022241877,0.0010369184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99593574,0.0008401822,0.00032562544,0.00022193757,0.00064289995,0.002033615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861974,0.0007194138,0.00031007448,0.000113580805,0.0001674684,0.000069700065],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008402639,0.00015706503,0.00026909515,0.000037741203,0.011593001,0.00016830389,0.0005548708,0.00003559085,0.0001922974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033150762,0.000107703505,0.0003042944,0.0002373418,0.00013076514,0.00011830812,0.00014060069,0.001133716,0.000003645052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017214003,0.000030406773,0.00015924383,0.000003750085,0.0011376746,8.955697e-7,0.041999195,0.00023233915,0.00011850706,0.94171816,0.00006229747,0.014520286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042590828,0.00016547691,0.0001699355,0.0000012262882,0.00079018064,0.000023465629,0.21043828,0.000018521052,0.00006152244,0.18981802,0.5978807,0.00020672072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023669438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12630038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7519002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024596883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012844412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98969376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285307532","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4130532","title":"Resurrecting 'She Asked for It': The Rough Sex Defence in Canadian Courts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of British Columbia; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Forensic engineering; Law; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.02495765694093481,"score_gpt":0.31593111700258303,"score_spread":0.2909734600616482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285307532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8405364,0.0053571984,0.000101449616,0.12586161,0.001670545,0.0014114658,0.00002117834,0.00006022139,0.024979917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99349624,0.00080647017,0.000027456354,0.0005253087,0.00041647043,0.00007834752,0.0000015674003,0.000011516439,0.0046366286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99560493,0.0005169945,0.00024240706,0.00018446942,0.0004709933,0.0029802164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991844,0.0003677433,0.0001391229,0.00008475003,0.00009100666,0.00013291831],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077060624,0.00011267955,0.0001526154,0.000059859733,0.006029351,0.00011127503,0.00055138,0.000046251782,0.00007104014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090046716,0.00008479026,0.00010823087,0.00034036252,0.00012136145,0.00016406135,0.00006121851,0.0018247861,0.0000043172704],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013701091,0.00012339289,0.0778009,0.000011052633,0.00042586797,0.000028682769,0.30275702,0.003032101,0.00007360548,0.5465907,0.013945667,0.055073995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064113684,0.00016234403,0.0030021467,0.000013301351,0.00003080199,0.00005265367,0.38457546,0.00031211769,0.0000071335426,0.06864969,0.54224753,0.000305722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5952097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9707075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52830184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008463506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052468157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99534285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285545023","doi":"10.7202/1088370ar","title":"La tutelle supplétive : un exemple de la nécessaire adaptabilité du principe de l’indisponibilité de l’autorité parentale en droit civil québécois","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01039045765980447,"score_gpt":0.25750475849983834,"score_spread":0.24711430084003386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285545023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94650835,0.0106237,0.00025698193,0.009268066,0.0006096007,0.00069565215,0.0003004671,0.0002482379,0.031488936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97737753,0.00499433,0.0027552063,0.00030276398,0.0015435237,0.0002561583,0.00007399589,0.00009947957,0.012596988],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99161696,0.0035479309,0.0008154039,0.001197222,0.00066769525,0.002154777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946787,0.0031501625,0.00034744208,0.0006716605,0.00031722937,0.0008348397],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035100554,0.0005622732,0.0009819099,0.00006740719,0.0017331064,0.00039456986,0.00094336766,0.0010696065,0.0015052785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030311635,0.0007843963,0.00072493893,0.0010150103,0.002094738,0.000543592,0.000566907,0.0012161729,0.00013147361],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011685371,0.0018910515,0.46983612,0.0011075705,0.00068618136,0.0022447011,0.3884413,0.0005921941,0.0021433053,0.102208175,0.0017777076,0.028954841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018868367,0.0002014179,0.41754243,0.0009009109,0.0006661348,0.00086522446,0.106701255,0.0015221363,0.0042676535,0.05689415,0.40670148,0.0018503824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09314639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1069986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40492377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007602033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024105883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285677011","doi":"10.29173/crossings97","title":"Re-Interpreting Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Crossings An Undergraduate Arts Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Appeal; Law; Political science; Legal pluralism; Adjudication; Treaty; Kinship; State (computer science); Salient; Legal realism; Comparative law","score_opus":0.04559373935482998,"score_gpt":0.34694844381007134,"score_spread":0.3013547044552414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285677011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49078757,0.00058919506,0.00026915272,0.07218088,0.002382155,0.00024022086,0.000009136234,0.00025642494,0.43328527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987622,0.00004356478,0.0006645978,0.0022668105,0.0006414457,0.000009458894,0.000002281386,0.000021809263,0.0087280115],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974263,0.00046162037,0.00034927146,0.000261995,0.0008541153,0.00064674765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989507,0.00012382858,0.00030379722,0.00012702445,0.0001794026,0.00031522175],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016398318,0.0001620626,0.00020710853,0.000045124296,0.021574836,0.0019372588,0.0004603952,0.00004229836,0.00066007813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022152741,0.00014568043,0.0001641601,0.00022134036,0.0009747893,0.0008906387,0.00021823644,0.0006936003,0.00002474256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016652796,0.0005085975,0.007510894,0.000018160285,0.00023127602,0.00044855324,0.532022,0.00091982156,0.0023859087,0.27902663,0.15530744,0.0214542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034624332,0.000109335066,0.00033815153,0.0000215896,0.000018808054,0.000045711397,0.08194326,0.0000951444,0.000049921106,0.021173015,0.89559716,0.00026164015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031057491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002921637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74028975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068175775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015435017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285711078","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4064993","title":"Opening the Canadian Constitution: Breathing New Life into the Federation? Not Likely","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Breathing; Law; Russian federation; Medicine; Geography; Psychiatry; Regional science","score_opus":0.03495176516184004,"score_gpt":0.2963403280488803,"score_spread":0.26138856288704027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285711078","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03404143,0.0054910276,0.0010660702,0.93366045,0.00046031497,0.0004450249,0.0000010610025,0.00005486159,0.024779757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891091,0.00086413627,0.000076389275,0.0065436643,0.002136481,0.000005016633,7.695912e-7,0.0000060306893,0.0012583975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975052,0.00029416147,0.0002122775,0.00015084632,0.000470372,0.0013671312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915415,0.00013732456,0.00011660728,0.00007002495,0.00014045648,0.00038143233],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018941113,0.000120035475,0.00013047707,0.0000150931855,0.012596512,0.0009352638,0.00054997136,0.00007211233,0.00011375621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011536792,0.00006623907,0.00009545885,0.00024675217,0.0003571515,0.0003697202,0.000050369286,0.0016687232,0.00007613308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016337191,0.0000041726767,0.0017673296,0.0000014978637,0.00020151753,0.0000070081655,0.16558245,0.00020144036,0.00003350682,0.8174845,0.0056306235,0.009069593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007331136,0.00013294548,0.002015339,0.00003197625,0.00012066497,0.00010542919,0.24761184,0.00024720322,0.00003376184,0.030111443,0.71841323,0.00044303574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70786273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9558568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9550677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020811344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014396953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286656278","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-06263-6_5","title":"Smudging, Yoga and Ethical Veganism: Exploring the Boundaries of Religious and Spiritual Practice in Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Religion, spirituality and health: a social scientific approach","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Spirituality; Conceptualization; Indigenous; Sociology; Law; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12779995591611698,"score_gpt":0.369029067575123,"score_spread":0.241229111659006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286656278","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034486584,0.078392014,0.000043485943,0.44434258,0.0028888509,0.0056677386,0.00036455502,0.00035998243,0.43345422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.876697,0.08674356,0.0018580384,0.012405139,0.0019658504,0.00072268065,0.00017942843,0.00015977747,0.019268537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947382,0.00087673543,0.0009914776,0.0010710548,0.0015802933,0.0007422473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748707,0.0009362805,0.0007257403,0.00027159057,0.00029420786,0.00028512444],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0101051675,0.00041581024,0.0009611676,0.00012208181,0.011824774,0.00091113045,0.00036476797,0.00065291265,0.000023347786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009180521,0.00035330086,0.0001473172,0.00030803727,0.0147215,0.00035377443,0.00066167855,0.0021189915,0.0000022173035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003376113,0.000042836364,0.00005655039,0.00025698703,0.000041626834,0.0000034304896,0.22716208,3.5586092e-7,7.9159753e-7,0.76094466,0.009695405,0.0017615356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039341746,0.00008265116,0.0005312302,0.00010660543,0.00007509474,0.00000847045,0.03498365,0.000003447447,6.2239417e-7,0.047776815,0.9156523,0.00038572325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06698502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02239789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90595686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050535833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008506624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287446906","doi":"10.1093/obo/9780195399301-0485","title":"Margery Kempe","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Renaissance and Reformation","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Mysticism; Faith; The Renaissance; Art; Imprisonment; White (mutation); SAINT; German; Classics; History; Art history; Literature; Sociology; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036949537744204924,"score_gpt":0.30033820414796825,"score_spread":0.26338866640376335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287446906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043756454,0.028841734,0.0000070813608,0.0027728465,0.001971751,0.00047779572,0.00008028503,0.00016049051,0.96131235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10155067,0.7122425,0.00013754691,0.00033342597,0.0023654527,0.00020145965,0.0007338126,0.000032907694,0.18240225],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983267,0.00018337593,0.0002856112,0.00022862855,0.000632755,0.0003429329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999343,0.00006437471,0.00028675314,0.00012536635,0.00008839524,0.00009213797],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042972303,0.00019414973,0.00031387105,0.00007181546,0.0020357724,0.00011118724,0.00018461594,0.00027038518,0.0006111001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012686707,0.00013966084,0.00009144332,0.00022062923,0.0002479366,0.0004560692,0.00013677149,0.000449319,0.00005748649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000123507825,0.000023406219,0.00047654373,0.00033140893,0.00006557572,0.000003345188,0.018997636,0.0000013928409,6.2149996e-7,0.0027341188,0.87025654,0.10709708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100751,0.000016741411,0.0019150593,0.00015386449,0.000024945597,0.0000011200024,0.005037897,0.0000039758415,0.0000020281493,0.00023247149,0.9922873,0.00022385252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021470343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042228051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7789101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004949044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012384754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288540096","doi":"","title":"Retour sur la place de l’intérêt supérieur de l’enfant dans la décision d’expulsion du territoire canadien d’un père ayant un enfant en charge","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Charge (physics); Political science; Psychology; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.009670115845632803,"score_gpt":0.24123717928739896,"score_spread":0.23156706344176617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288540096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8780936,0.0021462503,0.0013500082,0.034064014,0.0008116163,0.0011670734,0.00050424185,0.00035716698,0.08150606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93107134,0.011154376,0.009106325,0.00019269703,0.00020922183,0.00032589256,0.0005279382,0.0001244545,0.04728774],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96298754,0.031235557,0.0011346077,0.0016140081,0.0014739365,0.0015543752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98795503,0.0068304995,0.0010077152,0.0018125824,0.0015174989,0.00087665295],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018429838,0.00091512606,0.0010019244,0.00018036595,0.004522558,0.0006959955,0.003262623,0.00092325656,0.0020428125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006689703,0.0009177342,0.0006382954,0.00093680475,0.0013608914,0.0004322852,0.0037750164,0.002217455,0.00008530049],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082561135,0.0016863127,0.034729585,0.00024255269,0.00041634645,0.00030932543,0.775288,0.00033640722,0.0062815966,0.14869434,0.0052665574,0.026666464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001722738,0.0000061292844,0.056064576,0.0026118779,0.00030659794,0.00016329969,0.04169093,0.01608347,0.007995052,0.0021283736,0.8693842,0.0018427116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36133713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20268826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8641177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040427456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015019432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289355304","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebac013","title":"Experience with Ontario’s <i>Parenting Plan Guide</i> and <i>Template</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Multidisciplinary approach; Plan (archaeology); Conciliation; Psychology; Mental health; Resource (disambiguation); Medical education; Nursing; Political science; Public relations; Medicine; Psychiatry; Law; Mediation","score_opus":0.038377389262331744,"score_gpt":0.32988441375496086,"score_spread":0.2915070244926291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289355304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90747285,0.00059858314,0.000014978905,0.013070937,0.00041417155,0.000090320005,0.000010471404,0.000007974132,0.07831969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99536264,0.00023401184,0.0001253267,0.0026941353,0.00036458913,0.0000065928893,5.7214095e-7,0.0000034144678,0.0012087268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988516,0.0001249974,0.00021951023,0.00007673507,0.00059327274,0.00013386943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932396,0.0002140033,0.00022284499,0.000034730907,0.00014587614,0.000058588168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054336974,0.000066921886,0.0001262943,0.000035185938,0.0011548192,0.00018769856,0.00031290672,0.0000144646065,0.000028677076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008005478,0.000041098,0.000041386487,0.000057383204,0.0007032642,0.00022079815,0.00016200502,0.00019038148,5.042779e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062223227,0.000043647775,0.010186871,0.0000024147075,0.00029357246,0.00006803011,0.3573816,0.00010007542,0.00014988278,0.6275399,0.0020223903,0.0015893899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014899663,0.00006569164,0.005680873,0.000024010862,0.00001968365,0.0001467652,0.031051721,0.000005343841,0.000016686028,0.0031405324,0.9582631,0.00009561597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4426995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06697472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9562407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025346383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015000241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95005053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294326431","doi":"10.1093/he/9780191948909.003.0017","title":"Entick v Carrington [1765] 95 ER 807, King’s Bench","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Principle of legality; Law; Government (linguistics); History; Political science; Philosophy; Economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03719486046771367,"score_gpt":0.24752231749681233,"score_spread":0.21032745702909866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294326431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005605982,0.00030956647,0.0000053021854,0.00023257385,0.0008012256,0.0006658848,0.00013126628,0.00025079396,0.9970428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005099684,0.0016854432,0.00010605066,0.00008184318,0.00033283423,0.0000033555043,0.000033231838,0.000041983447,0.9926156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974804,0.00013195892,0.00021967682,0.00063332013,0.0009507209,0.00058390805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987815,0.00012721056,0.00030792278,0.000354428,0.00019217179,0.0002367576],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025109516,0.0004187457,0.0004985026,0.00008855799,0.002607305,0.000108582506,0.0009482108,0.00042548115,0.0013410583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038083064,0.0004673252,0.00039877585,0.000021085401,0.0007093076,0.00020655355,0.0010790498,0.00077001797,0.000006239984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038020098,0.000013885348,0.000060280126,0.00004433903,0.00029330095,0.00011253102,0.0144753605,0.000006898127,0.000006477535,0.97447896,0.007753512,0.002716428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030997297,0.000038523936,0.000057610097,0.000052521715,0.00025214726,7.9134975e-7,0.002429575,0.0000031096092,0.000009384481,0.00043625507,0.9958567,0.000553394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013583203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003019642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9881032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012868606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015870827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4299854058","doi":"10.3138/9781442689510","title":"Essays in the History of Canadian Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; History; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04246731379720787,"score_gpt":0.22325342782828267,"score_spread":0.1807861140310748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4299854058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025207677,0.0048036897,2.153933e-7,0.00008519433,0.00024431958,0.0003249029,0.000047461424,0.000012044014,0.99445695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022304275,0.0020415445,0.00005110938,0.000052860545,0.00006978875,6.159698e-7,0.0000056734157,0.00000634151,0.99554163],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988903,0.00018789462,0.00012702045,0.00016848248,0.00039100787,0.00023532985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927163,0.000110493645,0.00019238841,0.00019391988,0.0001381163,0.000093435985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020824272,0.00013362343,0.0003092091,0.000031691252,0.00031401336,0.0000042184233,0.00076195813,0.0002699293,0.00015130227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019779854,0.00012564939,0.00014172499,0.0000030497135,0.001615412,0.0000954936,0.00007576768,0.00017319128,0.0000019271322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010492539,0.000010395442,0.000008849413,0.000033119133,0.000052337677,0.000029509449,0.36398315,9.782513e-7,0.0000011472844,0.36166847,0.27385747,0.00034406254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015232773,0.000014726615,0.00011441411,0.000057447567,0.000041125564,1.9648566e-7,0.003754347,4.48065e-7,6.4163027e-7,0.00008981967,0.9956465,0.00012801474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99921376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99912465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.721789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005055401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010597854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99876404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300462089","doi":"10.3138/9781442684980","title":"The Persons Case","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Event (particle physics); Political science; Law; Psychology; History; Communication","score_opus":0.03713377580320751,"score_gpt":0.25474213035579024,"score_spread":0.21760835455258273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300462089","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000048894733,0.0057160268,0.000002586998,0.00012885897,0.00023181312,0.00038110904,0.0000623298,0.00006403454,0.99336433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00042125004,0.0047817943,0.00009044084,0.000010122732,0.00020129306,4.5055964e-7,0.0000028118648,0.000009871301,0.994482],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882287,0.00015416706,0.000105628955,0.00022132561,0.00040638485,0.00028965133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998984,0.00026450388,0.00021469283,0.00022604472,0.0001926518,0.00011815521],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015466416,0.000174028,0.00026498197,0.0000049378427,0.0034501,0.000028644643,0.0005636435,0.00027115326,0.00008299518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004383518,0.00014823643,0.00024277867,0.000001226378,0.0018122748,0.000101405414,0.00023768694,0.00018963219,0.0000069250823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044235374,0.000015843156,0.0000039565207,0.00003393933,0.00039737756,0.00088831014,0.40217727,8.752313e-7,0.0000015599416,0.0946294,0.49342313,0.008384097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015788249,0.000018376391,0.000010907053,0.000031500684,0.00009837503,0.000011089119,0.0103980005,0.0000016554887,0.0000012492662,0.00003212184,0.9890643,0.000174578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73324025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6552904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4956411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011418093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027956438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99784726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300589591","doi":"","title":"HIV/AIDS in the courts--Canada. Court affirms that severance exclusion for workers with disabilities violates Charter.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Severance; Appeal; Charter; Law; Political science; Constitutional court; Business; Constitution","score_opus":0.03078045482074922,"score_gpt":0.2576051799016946,"score_spread":0.2268247250809454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300589591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9267496,0.00050699204,0.000029617911,0.06604137,0.0002334518,0.0022874163,0.00002917455,0.000057670473,0.004064734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932576,0.000088923196,0.00019919194,0.0006435192,0.00040809304,0.002041832,0.00000499803,0.0000107771975,0.0033450692],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981795,0.00014105816,0.00016868817,0.0002515303,0.00060227374,0.00065695005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893445,0.0006808572,0.00008009185,0.00014079416,0.00007216396,0.0000916507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087861356,0.00016408686,0.00021236528,0.000015853077,0.0008713203,0.0001127794,0.0003552285,0.00006299219,0.000022368184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002743931,0.0000938061,0.000054876753,0.00017045415,0.00040011766,0.0003199759,0.00003768908,0.0001316749,0.000002796963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029128834,0.00019624051,0.6529413,0.000060794333,0.000118296055,0.000004177109,0.19462058,0.00038492176,0.000003395017,0.0033492723,0.06501807,0.083011664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075078994,0.000020031335,0.5677278,0.000032876356,0.000025170559,7.9646077e-7,0.13030213,0.00006689141,0.000026291704,0.0002471728,0.30049098,0.00030908294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07970947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6680793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58836985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005978746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009412864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92641884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301322948","doi":"","title":"Robert William Latimer v. Her Majesty The Queen: in the Supreme Court of Canada.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Law; Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.024276464342073357,"score_gpt":0.25257370807357965,"score_spread":0.22829724373150628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301322948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62459815,0.0008057415,0.0000023017149,0.20534767,0.00047487975,0.001777961,0.00000990952,0.00003271558,0.16695067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876242,0.0001303602,0.000010231707,0.00089164404,0.00016522147,0.00031938212,8.348374e-7,0.000004622475,0.010853462],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984418,0.00027385718,0.0001708382,0.00011781431,0.0005525258,0.00044317424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993778,0.00028397221,0.00006974877,0.00014137986,0.00007293087,0.000054185137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009995134,0.0000856894,0.00013280737,0.000009093351,0.0004261317,0.000032649856,0.00038750682,0.00004676556,0.0000653071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039525115,0.0000423065,0.000042173786,0.00030006486,0.00027687673,0.000093865856,0.000039969917,0.00013606083,0.0000026377131],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003622263,0.00015114323,0.58485264,0.000014066536,0.00014416223,0.000022795233,0.08264856,0.00012888137,0.000004505974,0.0066075153,0.29696423,0.028425282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007266895,0.0000011141206,0.6063216,0.0000018632252,0.000006406638,2.3016018e-7,0.004211588,0.0000023749528,0.0000033498538,0.000107393345,0.3892234,0.000048045193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85357314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9595741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36302608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021753782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010034789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32775036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306316358","doi":"10.46747/cfp.6810764","title":"Reversal of <i>Roe v Wade</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Family Physician","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Pregnancy; Depression (economics); Computer science; Medicine; Psychiatry; Biology","score_opus":0.026039797818804104,"score_gpt":0.2597848361954723,"score_spread":0.2337450383766682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306316358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20901234,0.0009606071,7.375122e-7,0.0050310353,0.0008672838,0.00037409796,0.00016958387,0.000048275935,0.783536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97815657,0.000026711286,0.00005063309,0.018961253,0.00033048395,0.000042023625,0.000010284099,0.000012682853,0.00240937],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982777,0.00029511453,0.0001450261,0.00020049274,0.00052745995,0.00055416505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930096,0.00007879273,0.00006672172,0.00015084553,0.00013230265,0.00027040852],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043958958,0.0000934318,0.0001795115,0.00007854339,0.0024105357,0.000024153629,0.00040556298,0.000037413673,0.000034970413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000391453,0.00010174366,0.00009278176,0.00067358743,0.00043725313,0.00011051192,0.00007545475,0.00026588238,0.000052949035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001166044,0.000096340525,0.0009773714,0.000021031154,0.00012586782,0.000039236806,0.0669313,0.000118512246,0.00341209,0.13432628,0.7671183,0.026822016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009650973,0.000027448084,0.0028795116,0.0000052111723,0.000009948648,3.259257e-8,0.07395759,0.0000022711815,0.000035002155,0.0007790117,0.92207754,0.00012993242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5383729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20371053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7811267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011355232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000602231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308786464","doi":"10.1163/17455316-18030006","title":"A Comparison of the Porvoo, Waterloo, and Called to Common Mission Agreements from the Perspective of Transitivity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Transitive relation; Presupposition; Perspective (graphical); Banyan; Sociology; History of religions; Law; Political science; Theology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.054688826396058356,"score_gpt":0.36895305017493857,"score_spread":0.3142642237788802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308786464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98426056,0.0003500562,0.000002899102,0.014086151,0.000142731,0.0003729742,0.000048791855,0.0000072577914,0.00072855904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99955016,0.000015725718,0.000038882605,0.00022750607,0.000031877786,0.000010965585,0.0000019320441,0.000002722879,0.0001202207],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828285,0.0010189799,0.00016934716,0.00015486509,0.00022677678,0.0001471939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927294,0.00040623682,0.000111776804,0.00011257774,0.00006208703,0.00003440016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037342653,0.00006781546,0.00025550474,0.000009647578,0.0009288167,0.000004290695,0.00026853345,0.000038504495,0.00015046762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016174672,0.00003591343,0.00006073454,0.00012314701,0.0004442902,0.000020674692,0.0002600261,0.00014615571,0.0000011426554],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021998385,0.0001863736,0.24583076,0.000004545657,0.00011350423,8.7339924e-7,0.72604305,0.0001118694,0.02089504,0.0024129276,0.0025125544,0.001668544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028072513,0.00015291796,0.7717581,0.000008692796,0.00003052892,1.2733905e-7,0.22149499,0.00002550582,0.0013347527,0.0011728503,0.0036781002,0.00006275382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062566265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014438309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5259273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010465856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025350999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9436762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310051473","doi":"10.1558/bar.24602","title":"Hell Hath No Fury By M. R. Henning (2021) and Divine Bodies By C. R. Moss (2019)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Body and Religion","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Crandall University","funders":"","keywords":"Perfection; New Testament; Early Christianity; Philosophy; Christianity; Theology; Haven; Martin luther; Christian theology; Religious studies; Literature; Art history; Art","score_opus":0.009258984673987862,"score_gpt":0.2587288894644893,"score_spread":0.24946990479050143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310051473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8470937,0.111486286,0.00002008673,0.015274535,0.00092999544,0.0005480441,0.000116254705,0.00015546975,0.024375645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94113636,0.029749094,0.00005481823,0.0003923838,0.00022041638,0.00003593273,0.00003365129,0.000010225314,0.028367143],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988489,0.00012927936,0.00014051174,0.00027008992,0.00031481023,0.00029638386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996166,0.00009875928,0.0000719413,0.00006697476,0.000046333495,0.000099345445],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003492112,0.00012524826,0.00017493329,0.0000133574,0.0026296286,0.000092948656,0.000100380246,0.00006215856,0.00007130613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009528406,0.00010163163,0.00003553563,0.00008329956,0.0002945056,0.00014029196,0.00024589448,0.00017080437,0.000013591688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037706548,0.000064191285,0.007712773,0.000025631514,0.000048713126,0.000006559,0.01958735,0.0000020038024,0.0036123781,0.0014441209,0.9650697,0.0023888848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029039368,0.00009934069,0.0016436246,0.000015728203,0.000021004862,0.0000016341825,0.005274798,0.000027650756,0.000092377566,0.00035293493,0.9919726,0.00020785887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00939426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001540349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09404265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007637477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016275348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310143484","doi":"10.32920/21631925.v1","title":"Determining the “Core of Indianness:” A Feminist Political Economy of NIL/TU,O v. BCGEU","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Queen's University; University of Ottawa; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Indigenous; Political science; Politics; Supreme court; Legislation; Trade union; Law; Sociology; Political economy; Economics; Labour economics","score_opus":0.07680886659921828,"score_gpt":0.3634729018774138,"score_spread":0.28666403527819556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310143484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2892118,0.00015705852,0.000005006323,0.0068727396,0.000622937,0.00076863763,0.00010988869,0.000056307726,0.7021956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997172,0.000019170138,0.00030667003,0.00050878484,0.00028422804,0.00012718962,0.000013883801,0.000014182338,0.0015538677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978546,0.00024812864,0.00057652884,0.00036036377,0.00046629956,0.0004940938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981609,0.0007333562,0.00045385014,0.00032704696,0.00019762946,0.00012719422],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007770271,0.000228788,0.00058358075,0.00004801276,0.0007497976,0.00005856398,0.0010151918,0.00024791315,0.0009888933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062500476,0.00015586537,0.00032258953,0.00014487296,0.0015030956,0.0000579758,0.001712048,0.0006187021,0.0000067162728],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013653165,0.00014519875,0.14945261,0.00026558712,0.00026004837,0.000003775541,0.09932363,0.000012733676,0.0000043756645,0.74668455,0.002503277,0.0013305818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008242957,0.00019226177,0.15617286,0.00023447881,0.0003456777,0.0000013549843,0.44924206,0.00007074701,0.0002510636,0.07256514,0.31885752,0.0012425432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0106593985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013579527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7079602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003465548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038176202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310143485","doi":"10.32920/21631925","title":"Determining the “Core of Indianness:” A Feminist Political Economy of NIL/TU,O v. BCGEU","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Queen's University; University of Ottawa; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Indigenous; Political science; Politics; Supreme court; Legislation; Law; Trade union; Sociology; Political economy; Economics; Labour economics","score_opus":0.07680886659921828,"score_gpt":0.3634729018774138,"score_spread":0.28666403527819556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310143485","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2892118,0.00015705852,0.000005006323,0.0068727396,0.000622937,0.00076863763,0.00010988869,0.000056307726,0.7021956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997172,0.000019170138,0.00030667003,0.00050878484,0.00028422804,0.00012718962,0.000013883801,0.000014182338,0.0015538677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978546,0.00024812864,0.00057652884,0.00036036377,0.00046629956,0.0004940938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981609,0.0007333562,0.00045385014,0.00032704696,0.00019762946,0.00012719422],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007770271,0.000228788,0.00058358075,0.00004801276,0.0007497976,0.00005856398,0.0010151918,0.00024791315,0.0009888933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062500476,0.00015586537,0.00032258953,0.00014487296,0.0015030956,0.0000579758,0.001712048,0.0006187021,0.0000067162728],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013653165,0.00014519875,0.14945261,0.00026558712,0.00026004837,0.000003775541,0.09932363,0.000012733676,0.0000043756645,0.74668455,0.002503277,0.0013305818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008242957,0.00019226177,0.15617286,0.00023447881,0.0003456777,0.0000013549843,0.44924206,0.00007074701,0.0002510636,0.07256514,0.31885752,0.0012425432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0106593985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013579527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7079602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003465548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038176202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312767195","doi":"10.56315/pscf12-21ashford","title":"The Doctrine of Creation: A Constructive Kuyperian Approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Constructive; Epistemology; Philosophy; Calculus (dental); Computer science; Programming language; Medicine; Theology; Dentistry; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.018568433742292386,"score_gpt":0.3129437401835317,"score_spread":0.2943753064412393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312767195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6117775,0.0038724996,0.0000790466,0.0096786395,0.00019672264,0.0003597721,0.000015406426,0.000045790886,0.37397462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997648,0.00087105256,0.00067177333,0.000047053167,0.00011152249,0.000012334436,4.1208665e-7,0.00000252431,0.0006353225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998447,0.00010299844,0.00012245904,0.00035488914,0.0007049332,0.00026770422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855775,0.0001822914,0.000084832194,0.00014517074,0.00092478003,0.00010514959],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000725203,0.000091197995,0.00014657844,0.000033986533,0.0025695735,0.00020668234,0.00024244441,0.000030847288,0.000028416434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015285864,0.000057123187,0.000038180577,0.0008326063,0.005896911,0.00021670481,0.00007706688,0.00010385916,0.0000033722824],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000332394,0.000099383295,0.0028803335,0.0000074769823,0.000039899933,0.0000036054491,0.31341022,0.0000035509627,0.00081207906,0.6753917,0.0002964993,0.0070220153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021601345,0.00005177169,0.043555383,0.000013709181,0.000011829545,0.0000034581453,0.9440322,0.000028209444,0.00074023457,0.00069093937,0.010538853,0.000117422795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011547565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027416955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67470074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019769772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039516512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99872893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312906517","doi":"10.15581/016.52.763","title":"Piero AMENTA, Administrative Procedures in Canonical Marriage Cases: History, Legislation and Praxis. Colection Gratianus Series, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, Québec 2011. xxiii, 258 pp.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ius Canonicum","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Legislation; Series (stratigraphy); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Geology","score_opus":0.05497576856850216,"score_gpt":0.32816249509923034,"score_spread":0.2731867265307282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312906517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95304495,0.01803174,0.000011008198,0.00603498,0.0013259522,0.0015262725,0.000047356974,0.00016950432,0.019808242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98204947,0.000845225,0.0003241741,0.00022710692,0.00041057396,0.00023330962,0.000024235278,0.00002085058,0.015865088],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977061,0.00037339513,0.0003831002,0.00039381883,0.00046155538,0.00068203115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998987,0.0002065533,0.00024250863,0.00015449831,0.00012411927,0.00028528707],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005265489,0.00027806472,0.000338458,0.000052159987,0.0006872907,0.000091729475,0.00015336476,0.00022251072,0.00048106333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005448473,0.0002539653,0.000067263434,0.00016819508,0.00067254103,0.0009853346,0.0000662683,0.0003075595,0.000038981583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00072236237,0.0008331221,0.3061102,0.0001855534,0.00024969663,0.00009394357,0.35363117,0.000016622766,0.0024226643,0.009564037,0.32269335,0.0034772775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067695696,0.00021331609,0.073523425,0.000053405984,0.00005587923,0.000036278798,0.013601929,0.000004718237,0.00012786346,0.000045073044,0.91118044,0.00048073303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5183422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9576145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5884871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037606328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022238607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313001868","doi":"10.9783/9780812298390","title":"The Textual Effects of David Walker's \"Appeal\"","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Pennsylvania Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Art; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.018422447468999636,"score_gpt":0.23819037290718947,"score_spread":0.21976792543818985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313001868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048605472,0.0014940934,0.000007067011,0.00018354211,0.0004058012,0.0009958969,0.00009927859,0.00007081711,0.9962574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00735022,0.0013169385,0.00006800546,0.00001686425,0.00013927226,0.0000018855459,0.00001622422,0.000020566478,0.99107003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761987,0.000438282,0.00024008074,0.00034714094,0.00095415127,0.00040049455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749625,0.0011788654,0.00060127507,0.00036173206,0.0002417486,0.000120104756],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000447976,0.00026496846,0.00053762534,0.00004903216,0.0022435938,0.000029898589,0.0014333931,0.0002658258,0.00019642439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015467238,0.00023721799,0.00034182254,0.000028290777,0.0021237587,0.00007354009,0.0009370046,0.0005017631,0.000010024705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029852727,0.00012245076,0.00003640968,0.0008680518,0.0014082454,0.00013693367,0.19395468,0.000014286567,0.00024012079,0.47419903,0.30787244,0.020848831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004043961,0.00009250461,0.00007823035,0.000105393265,0.00024762173,3.1816938e-7,0.008209704,0.0000018230799,0.000072263465,0.0005104897,0.99002784,0.0002494209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021395434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007293589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6821554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005327926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041151737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313167187","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192843272.003.0007","title":"Constitutional Theory, Federalism, and Cities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Federalism; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law and economics; Section (typography); Sociology; Law; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.044647882376562004,"score_gpt":0.294248637155134,"score_spread":0.249600754778572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313167187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005029253,0.0020820152,0.000009480214,0.0038647295,0.00040913656,0.00024123333,0.00006535861,0.00011310442,0.99316466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013873912,0.0020010627,0.000102993814,0.0006931925,0.0003752165,0.000019202365,0.000023108683,0.000007440011,0.9829039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998866,0.000064601794,0.0001481358,0.00023807025,0.00048807432,0.00019510191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942106,0.00028508116,0.00007800736,0.00006464536,0.000072025075,0.00007916815],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034445478,0.00018016437,0.00023454134,0.000018920751,0.0025768925,0.0001199596,0.00013673797,0.00014997389,0.029019112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000083896215,0.00014530633,0.000093167786,0.000012398007,0.0037874838,0.000116631294,0.000194061,0.00025134254,0.00006162769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042196343,0.0000021720202,0.000035915782,0.0000062694594,0.00007081445,0.0000052941555,0.004739786,2.413285e-7,2.339774e-7,0.9843369,0.009967324,0.0008308319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007320332,0.000009034367,0.00005448608,0.000013725582,0.000024625182,0.0000014502538,0.004127727,1.2006157e-7,2.644066e-7,0.10551913,0.8899762,0.00020002526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001960512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013193242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8800089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022343885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010154637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313425474","doi":"10.55476/001c.66252","title":"The Papal Apologies to Indigenous Peoples in Canada - Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Archbishop; Indigenous; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; History; Classics","score_opus":0.03062873834942487,"score_gpt":0.30187888847171973,"score_spread":0.27125015012229486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313425474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9194025,0.00033002615,0.0000021696605,0.07750079,0.0020661696,0.00010209322,0.0000016011141,0.000011509507,0.00058314746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976927,0.0007907226,0.000055046294,0.00016530666,0.0008037748,0.0000047843605,2.9447733e-7,0.0000026831176,0.00048470421],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986965,0.00033489108,0.000266673,0.000078315235,0.00026480347,0.0003588044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990931,0.00049876166,0.00015876813,0.00005960303,0.00012610409,0.00006366764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009589798,0.000065998036,0.00018721214,0.00003974694,0.00053816545,0.000023468834,0.0003124338,0.0000450763,0.000029290883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019309815,0.000038441252,0.00004141864,0.0004214099,0.00022900742,0.000077809746,0.00007476155,0.00017366747,0.000014118377],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002997217,0.00003784578,0.6681844,0.00001132934,0.00016458721,0.00025339276,0.14382476,0.003097114,0.00018334182,0.06752759,0.0866185,0.029797425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002499769,0.00015594288,0.7308528,0.000009201161,0.000012876218,0.000027139973,0.20764384,0.000004364119,0.00004284054,0.013157681,0.047713332,0.00013002276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7939658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99108976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19712394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079832575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007881518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4139188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313425493","doi":"10.55476/001c.66236","title":"Pope Francis’ Apology: Encounter and Meaning","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Indigenous; Sociology; Law; Media studies; History; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.05009670973549197,"score_gpt":0.33708695512139736,"score_spread":0.2869902453859054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313425493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9538935,0.00060997205,0.000025714,0.017872056,0.001133923,0.00007267022,0.0000013173151,0.000036071084,0.026354766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969449,0.0005816127,0.0002777844,0.00043928987,0.0005773996,0.000001365543,2.594676e-7,0.0000053164053,0.0011720425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889946,0.00026356595,0.00024427933,0.00009022133,0.00021245591,0.00029002797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923253,0.00028083147,0.00019784685,0.00004477274,0.00015800989,0.00008602591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011090713,0.000078827026,0.00026322808,0.0000739312,0.00037990505,0.000023140326,0.00018516208,0.000111025445,0.00021545662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006351286,0.00005427625,0.00007310822,0.0001816525,0.0006312542,0.00017352696,0.00008554004,0.00022822096,0.000049766557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023408189,0.00006929505,0.25536996,0.00002618846,0.0004280405,0.0004794255,0.16922958,0.00006612208,0.001814778,0.51193726,0.03906789,0.021277368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027237204,0.0009558102,0.3107299,0.00009377728,0.00018433073,0.00026079844,0.07740892,0.00014295007,0.00021876852,0.3653574,0.24125661,0.0006670507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037931316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044442527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20218872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051379408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029634828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2921961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315865937","doi":"10.4324/9781003036593-46","title":"The Law of Secession in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Supreme court; Referendum; Political science; Law; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Legislation; Alienation; Self-determination; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.03957956900967035,"score_gpt":0.28940881879745567,"score_spread":0.2498292497877853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315865937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018643486,0.00029381757,6.7023635e-8,0.0038265039,0.00043413247,0.0001695502,0.00000959093,0.000018903584,0.995061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.073713295,0.0013083739,0.000006411984,0.00010494334,0.000098245575,0.0000051270986,0.0000021190642,0.000009635736,0.9247519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897414,0.000028958963,0.00019861023,0.00011701903,0.0004983483,0.00018292345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999311,0.00039132067,0.00010282751,0.00008315854,0.000073701085,0.000038017148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024830774,0.00009685392,0.00018166775,0.000008520071,0.00047236084,0.000015918557,0.0002331583,0.000099103,0.0002173161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000068079775,0.000053351872,0.00004618925,0.000033285378,0.00029062483,0.000028751521,0.00009190223,0.00016599176,0.000025804684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001698615,7.443266e-7,0.00010546871,0.000007435056,0.000017603343,0.0000036830354,0.0022686422,0.0000011736029,8.0169434e-7,0.98243004,0.013399279,0.0017634431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046577003,0.0000033819815,0.00061379134,0.00007913646,0.000006315131,2.0360908e-8,0.0084749395,0.000001279629,0.0000049915616,0.009917033,0.98073745,0.000115114904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9982209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99995947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.972513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006369347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000492031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36330655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W431699311","doi":"","title":"The court reconvenes : courtly literature across the disciplines : selected papers from the Ninth Triennial Congress of the International Courtly Literature Society, University of British Columbia, 25-31 July, 1998","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ninth; Scholarship; Ideology; Poetics; History; Literature; Variety (cybernetics); Literary criticism; Tragedy (event); Classics; Media studies; Poetry; Social science; Sociology; Political science; Law; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.008881878869624889,"score_gpt":0.2425857972774161,"score_spread":0.23370391840779123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W431699311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28500617,0.057741977,0.000013075304,0.16087186,0.028582593,0.012119685,0.059798367,0.0005896955,0.39527658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031915337,0.012531009,0.000065962064,0.0006115768,0.0013118844,0.000016904542,0.0003395991,0.000040900926,0.95316684],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99596107,0.0006724658,0.00059489993,0.000614124,0.001546627,0.0006108408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943197,0.0019800432,0.0010768281,0.00055214774,0.001967138,0.00010413646],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001307942,0.00040815515,0.0006781763,0.000008512619,0.005111788,0.0015686363,0.0031611768,0.0008027683,0.00020073613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055023114,0.00024627734,0.0008814712,0.00059721427,0.0051148594,0.0002772138,0.0007149232,0.0014518807,0.000005985208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004416399,0.000051983425,0.0022309131,0.0000264496,0.0010666646,0.000006393017,0.06875238,0.0000038494563,0.00002939998,0.00042444997,0.9265023,0.00086108857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074128254,0.000029161138,0.015927708,0.00079063163,0.0002318444,0.0000050166736,0.034674346,0.000018618051,0.0000052795035,0.0009873736,0.9462227,0.00036601862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037496004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47301963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55789024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052149716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010403286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317369044","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198854081.003.0006","title":"Challenges and Contestations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Duty; Equity (law); Political science; Appeal; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.11907223010604079,"score_gpt":0.3324402776527627,"score_spread":0.2133680475467219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317369044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008091547,0.016266933,5.096605e-7,0.0129455775,0.00015276753,0.00022906534,0.000013376943,0.00009407995,0.9702896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032709483,0.06861955,0.00011870233,0.00015357089,0.00016053188,0.000023383001,0.0000068850463,0.000011911167,0.92763454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922806,0.000029698276,0.00010625893,0.00020556616,0.00029231992,0.00013809002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949974,0.0002324403,0.000064569016,0.0000674242,0.000068164656,0.00006768137],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016526334,0.000120634235,0.00017725382,0.000022631202,0.00089678756,0.000028204422,0.00009828879,0.000097941454,0.004605326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000088278306,0.000101636084,0.00005264302,0.0000075420485,0.00035042886,0.00008066294,0.000105780004,0.00017722465,0.00005498429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.5609055e-7,0.0000024334863,0.0000022681797,0.0000057799916,0.00003442312,0.0000023909613,0.020281397,4.5951605e-8,1.8584319e-7,0.95418626,0.0026197296,0.022864439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051823004,0.0000151858585,0.00022879921,0.000009479201,0.00002128152,3.144362e-7,0.010273416,1.6693389e-7,6.4025876e-8,0.01915152,0.9701049,0.00014307103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016323068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015768314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96748513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012303924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034433382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317501235","doi":"10.4324/9781003367727-11","title":"Ajzenstat versus the Oligarchs","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Neglect; Politics; Subject (documents); Political science; Human rights; Political economy; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Art","score_opus":0.11640910065973716,"score_gpt":0.3471176512314384,"score_spread":0.23070855057170125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317501235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002002631,0.00029451546,0.0000010317302,0.011776232,0.002631887,0.00038196237,0.000016552356,0.00033933675,0.98453844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013663819,0.002694624,0.000033770997,0.00023531508,0.0011441472,0.000016365493,0.000007889287,0.000033596614,0.9944679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983854,0.000043398628,0.00018333748,0.0002714245,0.00073694275,0.00037947702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872696,0.0007620344,0.00009653627,0.00020364278,0.0001148508,0.00009598399],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003679295,0.00022482564,0.00024503446,0.000024140683,0.0014501879,0.000104750936,0.00046605998,0.00025798444,0.0017720859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026672546,0.00012797095,0.00021998219,0.000048225564,0.00091834174,0.000057427533,0.00022653559,0.0003699963,0.0042359685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000930867,0.0000015080324,0.000002408392,0.000004251726,0.00012848641,0.0000072121948,0.009828537,5.3260493e-7,3.2624982e-7,0.8632649,0.12257602,0.0041765086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001294739,0.0000165091,0.000052516334,0.000022054035,0.000049650876,7.714981e-8,0.005683057,6.5691245e-7,8.161168e-7,0.012392452,0.9814411,0.0002116392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060563604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035165157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8588651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025098235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008163996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317639099","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v13.i2.3","title":"“Blackstoned” Again: Common Law Liberties, the Canadian Constitution, and the Principles of Fundamental Justice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Supreme court; Common law; Political science; Constitution; Economic Justice; Deference; Fundamental rights; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.05786004422079469,"score_gpt":0.3357350044854204,"score_spread":0.27787496026462566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317639099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011096798,0.26468748,0.0000023464402,0.040547017,0.00032102078,0.0019628138,0.00002342957,0.00004718472,0.6813119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95593524,0.03342725,0.00005185469,0.009622071,0.00012020638,0.000015406347,0.000003914701,0.0000050016083,0.0008190669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983973,0.00035544767,0.00037993118,0.00015347378,0.00036098907,0.00035288077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878484,0.0005558054,0.00017727334,0.00020133409,0.00013077556,0.00014994893],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029515184,0.00013549408,0.00035098763,0.000007894792,0.0025524616,0.00007813027,0.00032965012,0.000063022686,0.00009731109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027007918,0.00006809064,0.00009291261,0.00019339686,0.0065194564,0.00012369793,0.00009184155,0.00017990379,0.000034261648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005640569,0.000008728303,0.0007183203,0.0002489327,0.00003442584,0.000001974345,0.00334021,4.6935568e-7,5.88503e-7,0.9938141,0.0010433805,0.00078319554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019849632,0.000009334285,0.0024346204,0.0005537695,0.00019959985,0.0000028901243,0.0010242427,0.0000010395873,0.00000744245,0.00060749194,0.99485624,0.00010486113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75111353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96132714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99381286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026696108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001457912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318539256","doi":"10.1093/res/hgad008","title":"<scp>Ema Vyroubalová</scp> and <scp>James Robert Wood</scp> (eds). <i>The Literary Papers of the Reverend Jermyn Pratt (1723–1791)</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of English Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Poetry; Sister; Comedy; Art history; Art; Politics; History; Literature; Classics; Sociology; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.026703181310407238,"score_gpt":0.3078880057939828,"score_spread":0.28118482448357557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318539256","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14001013,0.8031064,1.16953416e-7,0.007557163,0.0012138629,0.0018205673,0.00005304971,0.00015246621,0.046086196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11308478,0.87443477,0.000037087804,0.0016783584,0.0008393582,0.00022963386,0.0000054282336,0.00003280569,0.009657761],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955855,0.0013653038,0.0008651003,0.00044966082,0.0010361378,0.00069832394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99094063,0.0065296683,0.0007613741,0.0006529845,0.0010165777,0.00009875858],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003481185,0.0004384186,0.0011704566,0.000038837374,0.0019667312,0.000079298654,0.0011494063,0.000118717995,0.000011553001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029428227,0.0001981238,0.00047112588,0.0014931316,0.0028343587,0.00027589372,0.0011180716,0.0004349475,0.000017428274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025630027,0.00007394299,0.0041755443,0.0055122725,0.0012719122,0.0000034309287,0.35433364,0.000004226451,0.000084582956,0.0037056021,0.61937416,0.011458143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022385642,0.000048975588,0.0092664305,0.0043075276,0.00042104287,9.226048e-7,0.07966677,9.4173987e-7,0.0001147828,0.0006771119,0.9051876,0.00008401046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004889635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043423855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28581348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009031113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000087723936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319454220","doi":"10.32920/22056779","title":"Embodying Equality: Stigma, Safety and Clément Gascon’s Disability Justice Legacy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Ableism; Economic Justice; Originalism; Sociology; Ideology; Narrative; Embodied cognition; Law; Stigma (botany); Disability studies; Criminology; Politics; Political science; Gender studies; Constitution; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12592838453772365,"score_gpt":0.3948429153240583,"score_spread":0.26891453078633465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319454220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6154224,0.0030120711,0.0023768833,0.14230056,0.01274802,0.0066682124,0.00040209029,0.0035228692,0.21354687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815597,0.0032500173,0.0012169124,0.00037061662,0.0011978047,0.0001218549,0.000046967707,0.000034497403,0.012201661],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995794,0.0007705204,0.00069564075,0.0010279998,0.00096173515,0.0007500974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975336,0.0011475658,0.0002634078,0.0004581196,0.0002751934,0.00032211203],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028645506,0.0004223884,0.00073228695,0.000026720309,0.0023915162,0.00063077314,0.0005032807,0.0004367649,0.0003551351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002563107,0.0003463224,0.00019659159,0.00023783375,0.0014812578,0.00032915166,0.0023643041,0.000777701,0.000118142794],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026058868,0.00072242366,0.09539992,0.005330205,0.0017147287,0.000034302993,0.4713668,0.0009849832,0.000055999477,0.3491129,0.019257506,0.05575967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011297239,0.00006430858,0.39626747,0.0006945576,0.001272076,7.9935495e-7,0.39338708,0.0005376585,0.000026005764,0.020210521,0.18376864,0.002641139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13948244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047877267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36613724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013363094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019638262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319454221","doi":"10.32920/22056782.v1","title":"The Alchemy of Equality Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Politics; Law; Political science; Social equality; Test (biology); Character (mathematics); Law and economics; Inequality; Fundamental rights; Section (typography); Sociology; Human rights; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.14316608975174794,"score_gpt":0.40922821297976913,"score_spread":0.2660621232280212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319454221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14441858,0.0013502293,0.00014594321,0.05674389,0.0053270943,0.001963613,0.000071729926,0.0008905357,0.78908837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92464185,0.00071843126,0.00029011894,0.00004196269,0.00045459034,0.0000641904,0.000006065298,0.000008242741,0.07377455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818087,0.000319303,0.0003137603,0.00025238097,0.00062886544,0.00030482552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842924,0.00079308025,0.00021390949,0.0002645567,0.00023666082,0.00006257627],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015100723,0.00013639378,0.00026635328,0.000011390842,0.0013844746,0.00009150679,0.00065427576,0.00022725869,0.00011365159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058559654,0.00007066534,0.00020896399,0.00012291613,0.0008546642,0.000035653957,0.00085453,0.000303523,0.00012695143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014787447,0.000070331545,0.0028093865,0.00013669337,0.00056590815,0.000002130049,0.11502634,0.000031705753,0.000037984337,0.79083276,0.08750872,0.0029632389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015588645,0.000012544682,0.020450093,0.00009916584,0.00007485799,3.5167496e-8,0.028817663,0.000027004193,0.0005837378,0.20141211,0.7478893,0.0004775987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16100208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07743821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78022325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016247532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009226608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319454222","doi":"10.32920/22056782","title":"The Alchemy of Equality Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Politics; Law; Character (mathematics); Test (biology); Political science; Social equality; Law and economics; Inequality; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14316608975174794,"score_gpt":0.40922821297976913,"score_spread":0.2660621232280212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319454222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14441858,0.0013502293,0.00014594321,0.05674389,0.0053270943,0.001963613,0.000071729926,0.0008905357,0.78908837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92464185,0.00071843126,0.00029011894,0.00004196269,0.00045459034,0.0000641904,0.000006065298,0.000008242741,0.07377455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818087,0.000319303,0.0003137603,0.00025238097,0.00062886544,0.00030482552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842924,0.00079308025,0.00021390949,0.0002645567,0.00023666082,0.00006257627],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015100723,0.00013639378,0.00026635328,0.000011390842,0.0013844746,0.00009150679,0.00065427576,0.00022725869,0.00011365159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058559654,0.00007066534,0.00020896399,0.00012291613,0.0008546642,0.000035653957,0.00085453,0.000303523,0.00012695143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014787447,0.000070331545,0.0028093865,0.00013669337,0.00056590815,0.000002130049,0.11502634,0.000031705753,0.000037984337,0.79083276,0.08750872,0.0029632389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015588645,0.000012544682,0.020450093,0.00009916584,0.00007485799,3.5167496e-8,0.028817663,0.000027004193,0.0005837378,0.20141211,0.7478893,0.0004775987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16100208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07743821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78022325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016247532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009226608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319454223","doi":"10.32920/22056779.v1","title":"Embodying Equality: Stigma, Safety and Clément Gascon’s Disability Justice Legacy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Ableism; Economic Justice; Originalism; Sociology; Ideology; Narrative; Embodied cognition; Law; Stigma (botany); Disability studies; Criminology; Politics; Political science; Gender studies; Constitution; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12592838453772365,"score_gpt":0.3948429153240583,"score_spread":0.26891453078633465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319454223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6154224,0.0030120711,0.0023768833,0.14230056,0.01274802,0.0066682124,0.00040209029,0.0035228692,0.21354687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815597,0.0032500173,0.0012169124,0.00037061662,0.0011978047,0.0001218549,0.000046967707,0.000034497403,0.012201661],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995794,0.0007705204,0.00069564075,0.0010279998,0.00096173515,0.0007500974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975336,0.0011475658,0.0002634078,0.0004581196,0.0002751934,0.00032211203],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028645506,0.0004223884,0.00073228695,0.000026720309,0.0023915162,0.00063077314,0.0005032807,0.0004367649,0.0003551351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002563107,0.0003463224,0.00019659159,0.00023783375,0.0014812578,0.00032915166,0.0023643041,0.000777701,0.000118142794],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026058868,0.00072242366,0.09539992,0.005330205,0.0017147287,0.000034302993,0.4713668,0.0009849832,0.000055999477,0.3491129,0.019257506,0.05575967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011297239,0.00006430858,0.39626747,0.0006945576,0.001272076,7.9935495e-7,0.39338708,0.0005376585,0.000026005764,0.020210521,0.18376864,0.002641139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13948244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047877267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36613724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013363094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019638262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319586040","doi":"10.32920/22057217","title":"Assessing Analogous Grounds: The Doctrinal and Normative Superiority of a Multi-Variable Approach","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immutability; Charter; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Variable (mathematics); Constructive; CLARITY; Normative; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14593278975122803,"score_gpt":0.3846935734387983,"score_spread":0.23876078368757025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319586040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69288945,0.0030523734,0.014656345,0.0058954735,0.0020364036,0.0041920193,0.00015220832,0.0008142869,0.27631146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775342,0.00050631823,0.019577477,0.000050756684,0.0002251344,0.00009565838,0.000015864507,0.0000091318525,0.0019855003],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767303,0.00058590114,0.00037863836,0.00041350554,0.00055741053,0.0003915321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986281,0.000501762,0.00025635233,0.00022027326,0.00030840014,0.00008511489],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017566048,0.00024591357,0.00051115843,0.0000457669,0.0013897408,0.0005486187,0.0004699292,0.0002904639,0.000032516313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069506664,0.00014993058,0.00012621503,0.00034017838,0.0011521665,0.00035322265,0.0010730496,0.0006725891,0.00000596442],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041224423,0.00057181326,0.11016287,0.0015582626,0.0016006886,0.000013845759,0.7078056,0.0010428819,0.00022793424,0.17044944,0.0016831303,0.0048423572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007723923,0.00004469579,0.3580288,0.00027639075,0.0003375112,0.0000034609882,0.61956483,0.006191743,0.00003835497,0.0054721697,0.008282092,0.0009875498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13317397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069287256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28464472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024900073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021697686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319864237","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-16556-6_3","title":"Case Law of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Legal studies in international, european and comparative criminal law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.19744936376853237,"score_gpt":0.3609492391368419,"score_spread":0.16349987536830954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319864237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007089698,0.001247608,4.4739775e-7,0.001129435,0.0011788432,0.00026745655,0.00016350347,0.000014665023,0.98890835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8273972,0.0005584458,0.00002112893,0.00022742499,0.00019163101,0.000005596379,0.0000044271032,0.000014069188,0.17158005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980946,0.00020722747,0.0005285575,0.00028148675,0.00068125024,0.00020685303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835545,0.0004454012,0.00038878882,0.00013498988,0.0006243639,0.000050990333],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039835446,0.00025430974,0.000539397,0.000030884352,0.0005985954,0.000031658314,0.0004359701,0.00004759318,0.000048006885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012872992,0.00018245554,0.00011784713,0.000049237147,0.0030904706,0.000097257944,0.0005258706,0.00031844538,0.00000552494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024803669,0.000015112691,0.00003589003,0.000057495832,0.00037936648,0.00032206252,0.021913255,0.000015552056,0.00000325708,0.9705923,0.006600793,0.00004010373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003525341,0.00006185839,0.0006036462,0.00068342005,0.00014849837,0.000037179314,0.04739258,0.00000849591,0.000053378775,0.0028948586,0.9474045,0.00035905742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44473025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91980106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96769744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034442876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000933915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320164552","doi":"10.7202/1095428ar","title":"L’angklung américain : spectre d’une rencontre coloniale oubliée","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de la Société québécoise de recherche en musique","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.08672196446232602,"score_gpt":0.39511851149038585,"score_spread":0.30839654702805985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320164552","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38216823,0.0058004335,0.00040856987,0.1443918,0.0014156423,0.0012272774,0.000097296666,0.0010586686,0.46343207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64663374,0.04140168,0.011871502,0.010906881,0.0046432787,0.00057515904,0.000075475924,0.0002647351,0.28362754],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798711,0.015570117,0.00071755314,0.0009314786,0.0007750163,0.0021347224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98212284,0.016007166,0.0004001292,0.00047840562,0.0002800554,0.0007114151],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0114145875,0.0007495789,0.0009988269,0.00017769217,0.0018143413,0.0003173584,0.0010803426,0.0053462996,0.00060598523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010162962,0.0007747287,0.0007707253,0.0033318307,0.0035907745,0.00045870416,0.00023855455,0.005660577,0.0004853267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009399634,0.00026666684,0.001573694,0.00032578417,0.00071868283,0.0005798811,0.5464226,0.00019107605,0.0021525577,0.23818997,0.073405996,0.13607912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00114048,0.00011033852,0.007319557,0.00029387182,0.00035432907,0.000032855158,0.17415774,0.0005529266,0.00041217395,0.09374612,0.7207225,0.0011571485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18159652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09594951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64731646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01564338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020869588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321499572","doi":"10.1017/s105383722200075x","title":"SMITH AT 300: THE DIGNITY OF TRADE","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Humanity; Butcher; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.058323617875863,"score_gpt":0.28764239699570987,"score_spread":0.22931877911984688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321499572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9530821,0.0036751798,8.8923287e-7,0.014405125,0.00554223,0.00016109114,0.000012104407,0.0000130322705,0.02310824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9619541,0.0006507254,0.000048634727,0.00009470549,0.00052146544,0.0000015132501,1.1577243e-7,0.000008113129,0.0367206],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882627,0.00026296405,0.0004577115,0.00007437503,0.0002141245,0.00016456308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984518,0.00033632095,0.0009604164,0.00015587252,0.00004381399,0.00005174454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013138504,0.000082991406,0.00029714603,0.00003339895,0.0003621486,0.00000609073,0.00065414514,0.000054890672,0.00014677063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024065065,0.000044738903,0.000358773,0.00007961106,0.0009056332,0.00014611587,0.00010937626,0.00017485558,0.000022288537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010210462,0.000065560715,0.008937396,0.000044863904,0.00033210096,0.0000031058432,0.10900236,0.00057882315,0.0016541951,0.004423872,0.873031,0.0018245949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002494309,0.00003009965,0.04979825,0.000035038294,0.000063110834,0.0000028992263,0.0047711,0.000012333101,0.00029420535,0.0005382717,0.94413084,0.000074429765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048599704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095881755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10423126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020803113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027860218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5439942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321506114","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4311423","title":"Positivism and Pluralism in Canadian Aboriginal Law: Reading Caron v Alberta and the Marshall Trilogy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trilogy; Positivism; Legal positivism; Pluralism (philosophy); Reading (process); Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Comparative law; History; Philosophy of law; Art history","score_opus":0.008676929000587887,"score_gpt":0.29005914739815175,"score_spread":0.2813822183975639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321506114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9265939,0.002872971,0.000001158461,0.05559529,0.00018257218,0.00023354779,0.0000021574804,0.00001817487,0.014500246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98198223,0.013332806,0.000004492478,0.00027309038,0.0002459073,0.000008532723,0.0000015288166,0.000008624213,0.0041428064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970346,0.0003465777,0.00016594646,0.00016214064,0.00020212868,0.0020886161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999329,0.0003351212,0.000063337146,0.000050194492,0.000043535463,0.00017883544],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026730548,0.000114821574,0.00019598016,0.00008226292,0.0014639033,0.00013563935,0.00015980139,0.00008636582,0.000008139682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017093187,0.000077377306,0.000040661,0.00026149562,0.00048434985,0.00019785855,0.000025922362,0.0009132072,0.000009067225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027589704,0.000002611306,0.009712713,0.0000017727192,0.000053465177,0.000012318236,0.02975457,0.0000020259479,0.000013642674,0.9581437,0.00014066145,0.0021349203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006099579,0.00023944612,0.10819802,0.00012274734,0.0001586055,0.00041695888,0.13726926,0.0002319189,0.000009909799,0.47006908,0.27630395,0.0008805258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96564335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4880746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014892358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010919005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323244453","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4372318","title":"Preventive Justice? Domestic Violence Protection Orders and their Intersections with Family and Other Laws and Legal Systems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Domestic violence; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.015838868160404578,"score_gpt":0.2809895349307326,"score_spread":0.265150666770328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323244453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929406,0.0033490108,0.0016584665,0.000838255,0.00017374918,0.00047248215,0.0000030512383,0.000070272916,0.00049409707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99226797,0.0065396596,0.000011340355,0.00002314242,0.00017745057,0.00003731482,2.475637e-7,0.000010785356,0.0009320862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848706,0.00019874427,0.00012912623,0.00019072265,0.00016778582,0.0008265856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996108,0.00008541829,0.000101441205,0.00003876697,0.000084071384,0.00007949898],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095126074,0.00012802008,0.00015222156,0.00006144512,0.0013878536,0.00018997844,0.000066371176,0.000058985217,0.0000014765556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001094032,0.00008352541,0.00002280372,0.00026376874,0.00036790333,0.0002717333,0.000034846304,0.0006225459,0.0000027811068],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008817903,0.00032641142,0.02942198,0.0006173291,0.0036850167,0.00005615336,0.2107013,0.00067076855,0.004751645,0.60151815,0.00037783338,0.14699163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016612499,0.0010637059,0.015355773,0.0005861278,0.0002682297,0.00061289844,0.9483746,0.0009499908,0.000012276993,0.021492125,0.009092959,0.0005300124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008472132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020125352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73767334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034997312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025852336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323337882","doi":"10.1017/9781846157370.007","title":"MS 32","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Art; Art history; Humanities; Computer science","score_opus":0.030529490274094278,"score_gpt":0.32812227820697887,"score_spread":0.2975927879328846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323337882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002945965,0.0011698938,0.0000063356215,0.0032632116,0.0003472986,0.0002232984,0.00000372165,0.0004936447,0.99448967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002211251,0.0010771937,0.0006621846,0.0004242863,0.0013865107,0.00000627604,0.0000031488782,0.000058368154,0.9961609],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991265,0.00005575472,0.0000763384,0.0001735678,0.0003123625,0.0002555014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997281,0.000023717219,0.000061860854,0.000090153044,0.000022712236,0.00007347348],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009885859,0.00013002573,0.00019110057,0.000026730993,0.00024156815,0.000045888897,0.00020486397,0.0002565641,0.033518292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007881431,0.00009121453,0.00007814238,0.0000959905,0.00019713372,0.000026267428,0.000027266355,0.000102860526,0.0017157614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.444451e-7,0.000008437105,0.000035358513,0.0000027451258,0.000020060077,0.0000013057585,0.0017281976,1.645357e-8,4.883175e-7,0.011429091,0.9820265,0.004747543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046771478,0.000005433378,0.0002530785,0.000022176886,0.00000991723,3.4528718e-8,0.0009936405,7.7160365e-8,8.086572e-7,0.00016035381,0.9983542,0.00015351042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060773227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0607746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031802528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009314503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028901764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323340196","doi":"10.7202/1096885ar","title":"L’Acte de Québec de 1774 : relique du passé ou charte contemporaine ?","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.03198643506024592,"score_gpt":0.26824604900451904,"score_spread":0.2362596139442731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323340196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7762816,0.003741214,0.00035339943,0.20219076,0.0007579765,0.00044353915,0.000067007575,0.00043420997,0.015730284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82868356,0.0059125237,0.00036945147,0.0025757416,0.001289067,0.00011132726,0.00002135066,0.00005335951,0.16098364],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99649215,0.0006048221,0.00042877567,0.000488618,0.0004697555,0.0015158833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801326,0.0007945953,0.00023639921,0.00024282922,0.00017065115,0.0005422458],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017927216,0.00036691272,0.0005110434,0.0000726658,0.0016165471,0.00014874898,0.0005195949,0.0007282138,0.00029917582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001814455,0.000378229,0.00034842227,0.0008023295,0.0020771946,0.0002880912,0.00011799328,0.00091788784,0.0007369463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010438355,0.00020051262,0.069389746,0.00030244768,0.0006930536,0.0008218406,0.5558416,0.00015159762,0.0017713615,0.18417835,0.15687588,0.029669186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072407123,0.00011456252,0.06374781,0.00017605763,0.00014155758,0.000020484356,0.036652513,0.0009199352,0.0002503337,0.010397824,0.88619375,0.0006611143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30890486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.151936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72931784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060862717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061966106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323356148","doi":"10.32920/22227346","title":"Federation of Law Societies: Towards a Deeper Understanding of the Principles of Fundamental Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Duty; Political science; Privilege (computing); State (computer science); Charter; Sociology","score_opus":0.274470502093711,"score_gpt":0.3856891183702765,"score_spread":0.11121861627656549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323356148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5721662,0.00062136643,0.0021535936,0.014818703,0.003784631,0.0027756698,0.00024689344,0.00021974272,0.40321317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99396133,0.0003024371,0.00082887744,0.000055054494,0.00010718708,0.00001983895,0.0000052801156,0.000010919502,0.004709058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980323,0.00020387858,0.0004834487,0.00022252889,0.00085439027,0.00020345688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875426,0.00027009562,0.00052182196,0.00017429562,0.0002457994,0.00003371281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007316032,0.00015510451,0.0003857038,0.000019862613,0.0007620167,0.000055411143,0.00039006292,0.00023758138,0.000101639256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003767315,0.000101241996,0.00030695074,0.00013848711,0.0013552525,0.00008222126,0.00083596667,0.00022371736,0.0000018025677],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013203817,0.000065822285,0.002130182,0.0010160354,0.00030777117,1.692227e-7,0.18473239,0.00066336954,0.0004810686,0.80962205,0.0009332432,0.000034665765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043857325,0.000060408624,0.014079331,0.0008579904,0.000552026,1.416184e-7,0.937281,0.00026239455,0.004831122,0.03773381,0.0034633211,0.00043987515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028542213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01948439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77188826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067277387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024705668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323356149","doi":"10.32920/22227346.v1","title":"Federation of Law Societies: Towards a Deeper Understanding of the Principles of Fundamental Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Jurisprudence; Duty; Political science; Privilege (computing); Charter; State (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.274470502093711,"score_gpt":0.3856891183702765,"score_spread":0.11121861627656549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323356149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5721662,0.00062136643,0.0021535936,0.014818703,0.003784631,0.0027756698,0.00024689344,0.00021974272,0.40321317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99396133,0.0003024371,0.00082887744,0.000055054494,0.00010718708,0.00001983895,0.0000052801156,0.000010919502,0.004709058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980323,0.00020387858,0.0004834487,0.00022252889,0.00085439027,0.00020345688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875426,0.00027009562,0.00052182196,0.00017429562,0.0002457994,0.00003371281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007316032,0.00015510451,0.0003857038,0.000019862613,0.0007620167,0.000055411143,0.00039006292,0.00023758138,0.000101639256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003767315,0.000101241996,0.00030695074,0.00013848711,0.0013552525,0.00008222126,0.00083596667,0.00022371736,0.0000018025677],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013203817,0.000065822285,0.002130182,0.0010160354,0.00030777117,1.692227e-7,0.18473239,0.00066336954,0.0004810686,0.80962205,0.0009332432,0.000034665765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043857325,0.000060408624,0.014079331,0.0008579904,0.000552026,1.416184e-7,0.937281,0.00026239455,0.004831122,0.03773381,0.0034633211,0.00043987515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028542213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01948439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77188826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067277387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024705668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323875403","doi":"10.1017/9781846158148.009","title":"Letters E and F","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Theology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01901822128043861,"score_gpt":0.2989637439986583,"score_spread":0.2799455227182197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323875403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018208896,0.00040165437,0.0000037119955,0.006056928,0.00039435836,0.00014171563,0.0000027201688,0.00018541564,0.99263144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005726006,0.0005215096,0.0008722778,0.0005294485,0.00076151104,0.000005992735,0.000001042347,0.000048619553,0.996687],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995142,0.000025894435,0.0000402115,0.0001259477,0.00014809878,0.00014561333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99982417,0.000025801888,0.000034945544,0.000051751234,0.000007735808,0.000055583445],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007209274,0.00008329921,0.00011341166,0.000018361265,0.00019111566,0.000041294974,0.00008612006,0.00017982449,0.0071889237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055006545,0.000058242604,0.000024374945,0.00003199507,0.00039974344,0.000019205163,0.000036689944,0.00012702766,0.00015270534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.4548768e-7,0.0000021290534,0.00023246517,0.000004518745,0.000016093232,7.214725e-7,0.0021030242,1.1433672e-9,0.00003866056,0.004696048,0.99050343,0.0024027848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003513202,0.0000011065845,0.00028850284,0.000008552449,0.0000068801337,5.1926115e-8,0.00078585325,3.748839e-8,0.0000013921929,0.000017143479,0.99875766,0.00009768504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048827697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.086816706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037989005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016864115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000808834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323875522","doi":"10.1017/9781846158148.008","title":"Letters C and D","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01895771130029139,"score_gpt":0.2978938564494604,"score_spread":0.27893614514916903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323875522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018447285,0.00040665144,0.000003703383,0.0059942463,0.00039620727,0.00014147395,0.0000027202823,0.0001854936,0.992685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00059190596,0.0005041773,0.0008683946,0.0005196164,0.0007587872,0.0000059972976,0.0000010428979,0.00004861078,0.9967015],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951565,0.00002586983,0.00004020429,0.00012597445,0.00014672613,0.00014557366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99982435,0.000025675196,0.000034940436,0.00005175026,0.000007735868,0.00005556126],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007206205,0.00008330652,0.000113403396,0.000018345347,0.00019281145,0.0000413925,0.0000860272,0.00017992686,0.0070487903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054654254,0.000058232556,0.000024377174,0.000031982996,0.00040456656,0.000019188383,0.000036660767,0.00012708957,0.00015522607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.4463413e-7,0.0000021328974,0.00023071391,0.000004528389,0.000016100825,7.4086904e-7,0.0020996307,1.1547098e-9,0.000038826864,0.0048095477,0.99040747,0.0023901754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035224526,0.0000011054161,0.00028598745,0.00000856099,0.000006887422,5.2852428e-8,0.00078368164,3.771471e-8,0.000001395886,0.000018002807,0.9987614,0.000097666576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04910093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08539157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03629064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016892642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008122693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327653302","doi":"10.7202/1097341ar","title":"Tenir lieu de parent au Québec : deux poids, deux mesures ?","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02253886009972034,"score_gpt":0.30334034490624834,"score_spread":0.280801484806528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327653302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94759387,0.0077665215,0.00014970232,0.032442335,0.001409058,0.0004165367,0.00006529229,0.00049723795,0.00965946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8788466,0.0023733187,0.0005418605,0.00096547423,0.0012484913,0.000099930556,0.000019776306,0.000050649614,0.11585389],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959151,0.0004983753,0.00044839358,0.00057434925,0.0007290415,0.0018347309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980141,0.0007839242,0.00019798198,0.00028913145,0.00014731922,0.00056757865],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011589585,0.00042239856,0.0005268899,0.00008774594,0.0024804529,0.00016697352,0.0006950641,0.00069928897,0.00025635396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013384554,0.00041093683,0.0004169381,0.0010274431,0.0026107903,0.00025878398,0.00018974728,0.0008280522,0.0009836378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055762357,0.00016259874,0.2933152,0.00028563876,0.0007577218,0.00029721964,0.48336947,0.0007400922,0.0004023366,0.04897361,0.089875735,0.08176462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056718657,0.000110236004,0.31289443,0.0001853307,0.0003003286,0.000013923564,0.07623512,0.00043625588,0.00024812392,0.008706461,0.59941125,0.0008913486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6392022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.626903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5095355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012530262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011280982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327653802","doi":"10.7202/1097336ar","title":"Do Children’s “Best Interests” Matter When Tracing Their Filiation in Quebec Civil Law ?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Context (archaeology); Scholarship; Best interests; Discretion; Family law; Political science; Negotiation; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.016735812830439404,"score_gpt":0.2675358642378865,"score_spread":0.2508000514074471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327653802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97378266,0.000111202215,0.00004976539,0.0050860397,0.00015752116,0.0002686498,0.000014990287,0.00014396006,0.020385193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851306,0.000058109967,0.000075808464,0.00061999075,0.0001979493,0.00004192624,0.000020014355,0.000015852267,0.013839745],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998645,0.00017388449,0.00020621116,0.0002590572,0.00023846909,0.00047739767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949056,0.00019515866,0.00007176133,0.000121702375,0.000036307683,0.00008449891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046978085,0.00014083454,0.00019134372,0.00006966632,0.0005833848,0.00017699559,0.00025366966,0.00021331722,0.00028213245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015295797,0.00012653066,0.00009470464,0.0002884641,0.00046406698,0.00030088786,0.00005238139,0.00034295875,0.00039915906],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002215625,0.00006928879,0.1939051,0.000039576204,0.00009317461,0.000020083042,0.73443204,0.00011634477,0.0002705494,0.045414023,0.011247828,0.014369858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007680946,0.000036599482,0.81078255,0.00026422634,0.00003769355,0.0000023597154,0.13901211,0.00011676007,0.00031896486,0.026215272,0.021728177,0.0007171969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25864172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6780739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61687744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014480604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029543033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74629503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327653806","doi":"10.7202/1097342ar","title":"Regards croisés sur l’union de fait en droit québécois","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015207447031241838,"score_gpt":0.2658322646091179,"score_spread":0.2506248175778761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327653806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93102103,0.0045752157,0.00056792464,0.03614177,0.0016756135,0.00050447806,0.00009198209,0.000603561,0.02481843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6301088,0.0052130613,0.00054897205,0.0007366337,0.0013177494,0.00007078864,0.000031890853,0.000066190805,0.3619059],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99520135,0.0010978712,0.00047290605,0.0006509164,0.0008351539,0.001741808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979475,0.0007790315,0.00021800672,0.00034227382,0.00020064285,0.000512539],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002717721,0.00042898068,0.0005752676,0.00012463411,0.001663198,0.000219212,0.00075897016,0.0010803692,0.0005498051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016246331,0.00047341536,0.00044999883,0.0014628927,0.0020877358,0.00047100653,0.00019031054,0.0011088029,0.0011013302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043836713,0.00019276462,0.016411787,0.00038589115,0.0006501449,0.00043667635,0.5373641,0.00044932202,0.0010450314,0.18473329,0.09811798,0.16016917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079216657,0.00013379552,0.14327312,0.00025669186,0.00026161093,0.000022005324,0.074864246,0.0008995998,0.00036494032,0.039047733,0.739015,0.0010691056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.272061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10449388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.640897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073954347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036060487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W435668673","doi":"10.71781/2265","title":"La règle prétorienne en droit français et canadien : étude de droit comparé","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Jurisprudence; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.006630580257234819,"score_gpt":0.2058975711718948,"score_spread":0.19926699091466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W435668673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79712665,0.0113163255,0.00008558075,0.0009921885,0.0014390207,0.0005382493,0.00009785477,0.00015629931,0.18824784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8850058,0.0022841473,0.0005408697,0.0001434168,0.00047931634,0.00005314323,0.0002576622,0.00004034397,0.11119535],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956719,0.0007125392,0.00053202535,0.0008374675,0.0011505091,0.0010955442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973617,0.00053506385,0.0004986124,0.00031806625,0.00048644238,0.00080008403],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006878096,0.00063319266,0.00073239,0.00017855236,0.014516003,0.00013276002,0.00085399055,0.0009888685,0.00020810514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026789994,0.0007648252,0.00048729265,0.00071642775,0.0010312427,0.00066240714,0.00021290843,0.001010617,0.00015625876],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030719518,0.00036435304,0.06939135,0.00016033104,0.0008631978,0.0030609998,0.74144584,0.002108413,0.0010501402,0.176171,0.0012022555,0.0038749278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011982804,0.00012140387,0.34714127,0.0004032129,0.00064251974,0.0003586025,0.3328988,0.00054279296,0.00045343893,0.0012654394,0.3138091,0.0011651581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8481999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7858219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40854704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026988566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023426593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361243094","doi":"10.1017/s0008423923000197","title":"Beyond the Constitutional Architecture:<i>An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families</i>at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Waterloo","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitutionality; Law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Constitution; Constitutional court; Indigenous; Expansive; Sociology","score_opus":0.019860049926325313,"score_gpt":0.2722495267594933,"score_spread":0.25238947683316804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361243094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9605147,0.00019738646,0.000003297877,0.036469482,0.00022485972,0.00012698038,0.00015163359,0.000004109006,0.0023075456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992501,0.000031302126,0.000030020952,0.00042763958,0.00017676929,0.0000010740442,8.3916365e-7,0.0000022900479,0.00007992787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809134,0.00011782626,0.00022502513,0.00014060807,0.00070125394,0.0007239532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978695,0.0007619064,0.0001016969,0.000084019564,0.00028361336,0.0008992701],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018206625,0.000084143176,0.00012879467,0.0001042459,0.0055769295,0.00014675624,0.00042846962,0.000032705277,0.000034313543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004485929,0.000047735022,0.000029298299,0.00059706176,0.009457058,0.00018488482,0.00007375851,0.00021440677,5.6436033e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039550173,0.0000038379217,0.07685477,0.000005259521,0.000024480087,0.000012611684,0.053148717,0.000085515305,0.000049754526,0.86826223,0.0010944387,0.00045444016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014244854,0.000034756526,0.95625114,0.000034677138,0.00002569754,0.000058881098,0.03638255,0.000018356217,0.00005735945,0.0036530055,0.0032259156,0.000115226736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9230909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99730086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8793964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009252043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066802944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365512570","doi":"10.1177/1037969x231170419","title":"The role of a First Nations Voice for delegated legislation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternative Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Parliament; Legislation; Scrutiny; Law; Indigenous; Political science; Project commissioning; Order (exchange); Public administration; Law and economics; Business; Publishing; Legislature; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.038757127700344465,"score_gpt":0.3434692466636243,"score_spread":0.3047121189632798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365512570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55599374,0.002523342,0.0022977036,0.079713285,0.004700476,0.0028787283,0.00016962324,0.00035243024,0.3513707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997438,0.0007682199,0.00019797846,0.00002162194,0.0005422766,0.000031309766,0.0000026287707,0.00000588907,0.0009920625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990191,0.00011751227,0.00019995609,0.00007720787,0.0003584404,0.00022782519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765724,0.0014266015,0.00021842246,0.000044358505,0.0006018741,0.000051520663],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073760404,0.0000618965,0.00009045227,0.00003247566,0.0055826916,0.0000877169,0.00023802165,0.000030372219,0.0000120363575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011017214,0.000035749126,0.0000914118,0.00031808653,0.00030402286,0.0002835665,0.00003234604,0.00010960338,0.000017616632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039967028,0.00003673805,0.0053956076,0.0000058736414,0.00031035862,0.0000020180387,0.06888997,0.0005903412,0.00023081254,0.91445065,0.0016724907,0.00837516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038292186,0.00004448163,0.003298744,0.000032261545,0.000023892659,0.0000011906699,0.028523449,0.0017330344,0.00065031165,0.041568592,0.9236489,0.00009220548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008236305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14710382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92197645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012375637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002829504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99836797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366809764","doi":"10.1353/rss.2009.0013","title":"Marriage and Morals Revisited","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Georgian; Portrait; History; Meaning (existential); Modernism (music); Period (music); Art history; Art; Literature; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.04160214193051547,"score_gpt":0.3350150180156303,"score_spread":0.2934128760851148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366809764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7907804,0.13981315,0.000029899018,0.053445738,0.0005672673,0.00055114564,0.000004979595,0.000054888525,0.014752507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87247133,0.1245382,0.00026524364,0.0006148064,0.0006168411,0.0000011618556,2.2728442e-7,0.0000082397055,0.0014839313],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976981,0.0005282688,0.0006015882,0.00014735875,0.00060553715,0.0004191333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980215,0.000833835,0.00045948374,0.00013304569,0.00039877152,0.00015340102],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002556882,0.00023581214,0.00063996395,0.00006357265,0.0017124447,0.00009407203,0.00035341812,0.000092206,0.000047217603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057023234,0.00012168265,0.00018170165,0.00032952047,0.0007564392,0.000326613,0.00004959806,0.00034082215,0.000012545943],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014070193,0.0006417298,0.008617368,0.00028879568,0.0042925887,0.00020968422,0.6923464,0.00011648428,0.01171126,0.03712556,0.19288777,0.050355323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005460713,0.0016947933,0.10496313,0.0012297105,0.0027459979,0.0001987686,0.20007876,0.000022892997,0.0029361185,0.04132067,0.6377189,0.0016295506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018682782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014508591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49226767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009662439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003691507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366809791","doi":"10.1353/rss.2003.0009","title":"Griffin Barry","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Griffin; Memoir; Wife; Politics; Greenwich; Brother; Art history; History; Classics; Art; Sociology; Law; Theology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.04320242250572444,"score_gpt":0.3226875889562434,"score_spread":0.27948516645051896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366809791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7627925,0.13412419,0.00012690075,0.025472544,0.003561615,0.00070277945,0.000004946648,0.00007973916,0.07313474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93036866,0.06462252,0.0003742505,0.00031508788,0.0006013433,0.000003970207,1.4032e-7,0.000017484042,0.0036965695],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99672735,0.0010250212,0.000694639,0.00015390836,0.0008350006,0.00056409097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716276,0.001440347,0.0004978162,0.00016825154,0.00055934605,0.0001714756],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036573391,0.00026856252,0.0006194083,0.000065826345,0.0023230917,0.00007273558,0.00049806654,0.00011513681,0.0001766006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012994607,0.00013880759,0.00031780003,0.00042418487,0.00097384333,0.0003069519,0.000046693163,0.00047482908,0.000061149716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054835074,0.0007143377,0.012193431,0.00020847317,0.005471244,0.00012601909,0.6775123,0.00047329784,0.003259538,0.060051925,0.23356967,0.005871404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014511929,0.00021621928,0.0038953123,0.00015979905,0.00063721713,0.00005678264,0.16444351,0.0000018645553,0.0024167413,0.0064259227,0.8198255,0.00046995204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041907403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009838605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5862558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001858087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001268088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99897575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367159149","doi":"10.7202/1078354ar","title":"Michael ASCH, Home and Native Land: Aboriginal Rights and The Canadian Constitution, Toronto, Methuen, 1984. 156 pages, $9.95 (paper)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Culture","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01321250374980118,"score_gpt":0.2904102434519969,"score_spread":0.27719773970219574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367159149","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18696825,0.25424692,0.000010149833,0.07246564,0.0017858722,0.0014946332,0.00029490519,0.00015698149,0.48257664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798374,0.0066462206,0.00045092462,0.0012530199,0.00059094076,0.000024785722,0.00002621842,0.000005467878,0.011164989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871653,0.0002800864,0.00012829571,0.00027486542,0.0002778031,0.0003224279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991412,0.00011361919,0.000056166784,0.00009152052,0.00035292504,0.0002445405],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032626183,0.00015943706,0.00023892347,0.0000071426703,0.0023008909,0.00023720872,0.00012824025,0.00016924119,0.00022606332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021137363,0.00008853721,0.000051490293,0.00013565896,0.0016046065,0.00033424736,0.000034996334,0.00021606093,0.000015207056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002604653,0.000023351735,0.0055139684,0.000023796592,0.000294456,0.000068059504,0.31746578,0.0000010841692,0.000099996694,0.59310615,0.08270613,0.0006712002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069650856,0.0000082362985,0.008600931,0.000023718938,0.00006268028,0.0000082069455,0.021069296,0.0000025264828,0.00002752217,0.0034018373,0.96590865,0.00018988534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7217587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98847026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8832025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003568437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030589724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367159187","doi":"10.7202/1078343ar","title":"Jack GOODY, The Development of Family and Marriage in Europe, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1983. 308 pages, U.S. $39.50 (cloth), U.S. $12.95 (paper)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Culture","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.03578019191070902,"score_gpt":0.25881070232615583,"score_spread":0.2230305104154468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367159187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6531677,0.023116538,0.0000120688965,0.004689168,0.0004840222,0.0008826301,0.00013017537,0.00010164713,0.31741604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85468036,0.028972967,0.0019607597,0.00062463246,0.00037494797,0.000011200636,0.00007092454,0.00003650999,0.113267675],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980599,0.00040777843,0.00027981345,0.00039938188,0.0004478176,0.000405271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910015,0.000094909396,0.00014150927,0.00020066542,0.00033728185,0.0001254953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039722733,0.00022339798,0.00032151013,0.000014432857,0.00073416106,0.00008669331,0.000388018,0.00016392954,0.000021846527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003506123,0.0001563886,0.00006606106,0.00050862087,0.000490282,0.00027527122,0.00038183702,0.0003237915,0.000020583424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104848375,0.0004206407,0.030937104,0.00028908602,0.0004307122,0.0002491655,0.20209916,0.000019236022,0.022783214,0.034785397,0.7028047,0.0050767395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003331578,0.000008618468,0.25549048,0.000047949437,0.000025086514,0.0000011657185,0.030837536,0.0000019417207,0.00028081588,0.0000018828874,0.71279067,0.0001806683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00442511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009450927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22455339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001876011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000254802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66894716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367395453","doi":"10.29173/cjfy29954","title":"Divorce, Treaty, and Expulsion in B.W. Powe's \"The Unsaid Passing\"","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Family and Youth / Le Journal Canadien de Famille et de la Jeunesse","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unsaid; Aside; Poetry; Reading (process); Treaty; Politics; Sociology; Law; Literature; Political science; Art; Social science","score_opus":0.0261268222902799,"score_gpt":0.2885158420070179,"score_spread":0.262389019716738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367395453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790572,0.004481427,0.000009017166,0.009561365,0.00044009928,0.00011393355,0.000029542085,0.000009814979,0.00629762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940142,0.0040696403,0.00006653215,0.00081375433,0.0003327559,0.0000025725888,0.0000016289191,0.000019944257,0.000678951],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997195,0.000995943,0.00044785163,0.00016209787,0.0003378094,0.0008612719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975477,0.0004754743,0.00027429024,0.00008796936,0.0002186073,0.0013959545],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039014022,0.00020146139,0.00036037344,0.00039286146,0.0018843589,0.00049603515,0.00035215027,0.00019960292,0.000010826664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010808471,0.00014740074,0.00010916377,0.0005958851,0.00069441984,0.00040304664,0.00003568346,0.0008719754,0.000001447661],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000830219,0.000029580257,0.3255538,0.00003391629,0.00016202367,0.005343944,0.6369373,0.0003795108,0.00016407602,0.008983935,0.010380229,0.011948626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010506205,0.000109181055,0.5714633,0.00026228928,0.000060122264,0.0007350688,0.37499544,0.000040004958,0.0000057027537,0.0019127217,0.049091443,0.00027409373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47707358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7628285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28575495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009346898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002907025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372232466","doi":"10.2307/jj.2711607.23","title":"Church and Cult in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cult; History; Ancient history","score_opus":0.0461393095044684,"score_gpt":0.28609091655891744,"score_spread":0.23995160705444904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372232466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00093665114,0.00028647817,8.920207e-8,0.0037221634,0.00028320937,0.00021244193,0.000013836787,0.000044750166,0.9945004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022156075,0.0017770889,0.000021026757,0.00018139216,0.00015406877,0.000007401455,0.000004308317,0.000013652791,0.975685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989612,0.000016778344,0.00015161897,0.00021598647,0.00040880023,0.0002456277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961287,0.00014232642,0.00004621348,0.00005937168,0.000052236825,0.00008697867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001498533,0.00014030382,0.0002350983,0.000024361121,0.00026261833,0.000030127801,0.00012061381,0.0001419042,0.0007752169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008388285,0.00011071905,0.000029604995,0.00003443233,0.00016673878,0.000040574356,0.00009471932,0.00021246521,0.00007261927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036523295,0.00000315193,0.004772873,0.000043711927,0.00009278166,0.00009474328,0.015482162,0.0000017374651,0.000002067642,0.8275547,0.14202264,0.009925775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009015915,0.000004081639,0.011125802,0.00005257859,0.00000993756,1.5066043e-7,0.006200297,0.0000018818425,4.4631253e-7,0.003668731,0.9785783,0.00026762695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9974125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99983406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83655566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094032753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000522002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8488081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372348573","doi":"10.55221/1940-5537.1159","title":"Review of C.S. Lewis and Bede Griffiths: Chief Companions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sehnsucht The C S Lewis Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Editor in chief; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.05455836190121451,"score_gpt":0.34879145438850895,"score_spread":0.29423309248729446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372348573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3621952,0.3510809,0.00005034059,0.24261235,0.0029354892,0.0015102646,0.000084853775,0.0003537075,0.039176915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62785345,0.36694923,0.00018876896,0.0017077865,0.001078076,0.00001680227,0.000004581251,0.000019470257,0.002181848],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802923,0.00046503876,0.00039145286,0.00014659243,0.00055603206,0.00041166946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988023,0.0003737231,0.0002693661,0.00014665311,0.0002482137,0.00015972638],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020479686,0.00014280205,0.00034421406,0.00005053025,0.0019680883,0.00009897301,0.00042538604,0.00006253078,0.0001752717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008324263,0.00008286983,0.00020756766,0.00066756917,0.000707239,0.00019915808,0.00014284518,0.00039956075,0.00006275008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003654481,0.00019815537,0.016794553,0.0018629634,0.0012797975,0.000051925934,0.14225894,0.0000377468,0.0009677093,0.023489283,0.7167271,0.09629528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005937611,0.00008488544,0.08968722,0.0039701476,0.00029214428,0.000085210384,0.030855192,0.000029026067,0.000051102063,0.0036001483,0.870356,0.00039516724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010624119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041438403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26565826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008921852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008178705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377260870","doi":"10.1515/9780773569195","title":"A Seat at the Table","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Computer science; Database","score_opus":0.02432160594546224,"score_gpt":0.24423507148598111,"score_spread":0.21991346554051888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377260870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002290022,0.000015582804,0.0000029558591,0.0016978092,0.00038402044,0.0009794079,0.0003722305,0.00029446662,0.9962306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00023281161,0.0010770372,0.000036027443,0.0002452,0.0003865083,0.000005822219,0.000040215524,0.000039747127,0.9979366],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696237,0.00042633415,0.0002143386,0.0006488179,0.0009350186,0.00081314496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982444,0.00035390884,0.00030552235,0.00050124107,0.0003320783,0.00026284787],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032487945,0.00047288943,0.0005380671,0.000068047484,0.0059218043,0.00010312943,0.0011195089,0.00062078936,0.00032033114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007791369,0.00037925417,0.00034469637,0.00006316683,0.0013320663,0.0001880634,0.0012070709,0.00065823115,0.000115973526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007708779,0.000025381094,0.000021604965,0.00005648964,0.00041302666,0.00019954846,0.0053824065,0.000016866563,0.0000027728227,0.45386663,0.53901553,0.00092261995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037738177,0.000023519724,0.000019048495,0.0000844314,0.00025732312,8.7409984e-7,0.0018103818,0.0000011689228,0.000026092646,0.00018584196,0.9967152,0.0004987352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044718977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033339404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45769966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032863887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020218862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377263127","doi":"10.1515/9780773572966-013","title":"Toronto Diocesan Regulations, 1842","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.023773654045040296,"score_gpt":0.2490477140582921,"score_spread":0.2252740600132518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377263127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010422468,0.00003334273,0.0000065105496,0.0010139567,0.0003207898,0.0007156618,0.00027943787,0.00039939294,0.99722046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033754173,0.0014052207,0.00037049103,0.000114892995,0.0006102121,0.0000026650832,0.000036110105,0.000048092184,0.9940369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974779,0.00015331461,0.00029169294,0.00067021174,0.0008340267,0.00057286344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983841,0.00014659892,0.00035684922,0.00043411352,0.0003602967,0.00031800751],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020341507,0.0004990085,0.00056546234,0.00006624484,0.0028005205,0.000083992854,0.00072820554,0.0007020302,0.0005210648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043931886,0.00053200196,0.0003739023,0.000014610042,0.0007283261,0.00042528808,0.00046564214,0.0004002439,0.000053599437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031278163,0.000014369839,0.00000498659,0.000023924984,0.00022884356,0.000033204262,0.0029057194,0.000007173647,0.0000014127528,0.9812684,0.011671935,0.0038087268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035653624,0.000025693058,0.00007025246,0.000106579566,0.00023072354,3.1732174e-7,0.001479762,0.0000017515438,0.00001334202,0.00038336922,0.9966908,0.0006408791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059773453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009514728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98501885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024674986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008352335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377263133","doi":"10.1515/9780773571495","title":"The Most Dangerous Branch","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.02053553296508497,"score_gpt":0.24115200632997252,"score_spread":0.22061647336488754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377263133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007390226,0.000028535516,0.000009145263,0.0010763437,0.0007573536,0.00093664945,0.00023760578,0.0002674727,0.9966795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00024188729,0.0014356899,0.000068462585,0.00022370335,0.00031202182,0.000005548725,0.000020877758,0.000045000415,0.9976468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967261,0.000601388,0.00026446936,0.0006262965,0.0009324228,0.000849331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978845,0.000534024,0.00036005487,0.00051017903,0.00043288464,0.00027834714],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041699887,0.0004950825,0.00052476994,0.00006409235,0.0071725408,0.00017301866,0.0011837246,0.0006717583,0.000037560043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016608795,0.00041127947,0.00032004176,0.000060601313,0.0014695092,0.00017139608,0.00048719987,0.0007969315,0.000048768066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035217694,0.00001667228,0.000004854419,0.00003543316,0.00029714787,0.0000645649,0.0028180487,0.000003105099,0.0000013594356,0.7565766,0.23664474,0.00350227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036620343,0.000026269532,0.00001425228,0.00007284536,0.00018237004,5.062576e-7,0.0013269865,3.1840938e-7,0.000020102765,0.00058423413,0.9968731,0.000532847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013960765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000115323135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76022834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017639354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029771635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378084134","doi":"10.22215/cjcr.v9i1.4039","title":"La Discrimination À L’égard Des Enfants Autochtones Au Québec : Regard Sur L’application Indifférenciée De La Loi Sur La Protection De La Jeunesse","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Children s Rights / Revue canadienne des droits des enfants","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Political science; Ethnology; Art","score_opus":0.017248586792371883,"score_gpt":0.2572857259925419,"score_spread":0.24003713920017003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378084134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9875482,0.0041740406,0.00016571305,0.0014290747,0.00058287504,0.00083605497,0.00028555954,0.00004589099,0.004932604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99328834,0.0005125393,0.00039942077,0.00006212187,0.0007181714,0.00013683333,0.000030326264,0.00008273111,0.0047694906],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922853,0.0038746109,0.00094396557,0.0006034485,0.0004863089,0.0018063565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994581,0.0009827449,0.0010124558,0.00032728162,0.0006761256,0.0024204024],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00429286,0.0005847385,0.00079138554,0.0005650708,0.005180558,0.00045308284,0.0010566805,0.0005687535,0.00024289936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018401524,0.0005896476,0.00039070737,0.0011731096,0.0046317047,0.0011959564,0.000094574854,0.0015421908,0.000008572998],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001354225,0.0003176352,0.20787308,0.00041763706,0.00087501976,0.0011579277,0.53097284,0.0017310441,0.00034905874,0.020816531,0.00067826814,0.23467556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014672021,0.0003419646,0.8016877,0.0010343376,0.0005958218,0.0050567216,0.008718686,0.000342728,0.000290006,0.024921244,0.15444718,0.0010963903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9628094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5938146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01767153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007202069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378383770","doi":"10.1515/9780773597549-008","title":"The Aboriginal Charter of Rights: The Royal Proclamation of 1763 and the Constitution of Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proclamation; Charter; Constitution; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.014854551540961674,"score_gpt":0.22883200476054055,"score_spread":0.21397745321957887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378383770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024589367,0.000029547586,0.0000044109966,0.001105427,0.0001647932,0.00078394293,0.00020467336,0.000012172358,0.99744916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37064818,0.00018773592,0.000017239485,0.000022037437,0.00008502755,0.0000032035036,0.0000057517873,0.0000069688617,0.62902385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986169,0.00019476605,0.00023063671,0.00015672344,0.00063033454,0.00017068931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982271,0.00033041352,0.00054662843,0.00018923334,0.0006531531,0.000053447322],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047731094,0.00016462676,0.0003174041,0.000020057889,0.0014490841,0.000014736936,0.0003904283,0.00014030679,0.000005983016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004538284,0.00008386287,0.000089324545,0.000013749456,0.003426846,0.000060004055,0.000112919704,0.00020602389,1.7401388e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011434529,0.00000315102,0.000005792339,0.000030302475,0.00015492916,0.0000016620584,0.0031809695,0.000011970304,7.7174445e-7,0.9936247,0.0027360758,0.00013533205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005012923,0.000019173849,0.000042340605,0.000086019834,0.00018498908,1.5770831e-7,0.0018017024,0.000012242148,0.0000617317,0.0014272508,0.99575603,0.00010706041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6953556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041148737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99301994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028145444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033317102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379209154","doi":"10.1007/s10691-023-09534-9","title":"Correction: Compromise on Parenting and Family Violence? Reforms to Canada’s Divorce Act","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Public international law; Political science; Political philosophy; Human rights; Law; Family law; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology; International law; Politics","score_opus":0.0487212535823784,"score_gpt":0.3319946481442398,"score_spread":0.2832733945618614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379209154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9123146,0.000958256,8.812229e-7,0.010922046,0.0041493345,0.00053113885,0.000027921991,0.0003314827,0.07076432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98553234,0.001027081,0.000029117367,0.0009479676,0.00049739954,0.0000891728,0.000004035029,0.000013276393,0.01185958],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979655,0.00008460428,0.0002713719,0.00042044514,0.0006545102,0.0006035726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990023,0.00042969806,0.00009817134,0.00012552703,0.00014638851,0.00019796677],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004343198,0.0002337713,0.00037282804,0.000043958793,0.0033199266,0.0001377485,0.00021464986,0.000059875456,0.0000075264015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011136171,0.00017344578,0.000055717694,0.00049213925,0.0003820863,0.00009447043,0.00030477694,0.00020425268,0.000062291365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020274623,0.000097017764,0.071757205,0.00013870593,0.0006742672,0.0001779308,0.22512685,0.00017605028,0.00018442138,0.0053314827,0.6162505,0.07988283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022514872,0.00011322862,0.15528953,0.00030818058,0.000027175553,0.0000011091652,0.2199594,0.000029364179,0.00006736442,0.00006389127,0.6235278,0.00038780333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66127485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80104375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13976893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000707001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017643716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379804863","doi":"10.1353/fro.2013.a520039","title":"The Question of Muslim Women’s Rights and the Ontario Shari’ah Tribunals: Examining Liberal Claims","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers A Journal of Women Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Arbitration; Faith; Islam; Political science; Oppression; Sociology; Afghan; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Gender studies; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.026450436376571265,"score_gpt":0.29532706188780783,"score_spread":0.2688766255112366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379804863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9837217,0.01015291,0.000018499997,0.004141578,0.0010132834,0.00036597633,0.0000013909324,0.000010791719,0.0005738732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99035305,0.0032902358,0.00040156144,0.00011123548,0.0003438944,0.000101054444,1.375322e-7,0.0000070305623,0.0053918147],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973439,0.0006151716,0.0006490418,0.00014378704,0.00065067876,0.00059740583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746335,0.00077964773,0.00076794013,0.000107848864,0.00072409667,0.00015710467],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004078403,0.00018888149,0.00069914834,0.00005479944,0.0021988468,0.00018259283,0.00036336828,0.0000686485,0.00004192271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081173034,0.0000843988,0.00011429753,0.00016958313,0.0021049278,0.0005093967,0.00014659042,0.00034980773,0.0000024013243],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015613419,0.000028888451,0.010139578,0.000011058526,0.0011914867,0.0000027929384,0.9718319,0.000003615789,0.000008323735,0.0008416016,0.013193635,0.0025909953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017111273,0.00028250425,0.04020617,0.00009204227,0.000085909924,0.000003998553,0.8914237,0.000008214259,0.0000081824555,0.033547986,0.032462865,0.0001672793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010370522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009713541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08040817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002036938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010546742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379931748","doi":"10.1353/cul.2018.a706915","title":"Pornocratic Fantasy and the Contractarian Conception of Sexual Exchange","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cultural Critique","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subordination (linguistics); Autonomy; Property (philosophy); Power (physics); Criticism; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03789863533024792,"score_gpt":0.3565990926645255,"score_spread":0.3187004573342776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379931748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94970804,0.0011908815,0.000030959956,0.021012332,0.00032215452,0.00063871936,0.000017290498,0.000062581516,0.027017036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99650085,0.0003132598,0.00012441778,0.00047578837,0.0008041258,0.000031122763,0.000004645218,0.000004154041,0.0017416306],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888074,0.00033666362,0.00018560217,0.00015680856,0.00021464218,0.00022552541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991957,0.000197604,0.00008935551,0.00007675321,0.0003749111,0.000065673856],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051974563,0.00010473173,0.0002072734,0.000008919702,0.000858596,0.000077363205,0.00013975662,0.00008878238,0.00018740295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006754034,0.000056929548,0.000036253638,0.00010097013,0.0033486625,0.00031481573,0.000047668273,0.00011497972,0.000015692816],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018834019,0.00005631325,0.0019349254,0.00011019125,0.0001262102,0.000004794015,0.6170606,2.0439607e-7,0.010780233,0.33569434,0.023175176,0.0108687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006131981,0.0006501083,0.0807769,0.00019014806,0.00032800063,0.000017865934,0.6539757,0.00010992311,0.0036143158,0.010076903,0.24313669,0.0009914286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008731832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009134804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32561743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049338923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021605114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380228146","doi":"10.1515/9780228003076-010","title":"“Our Deep and Sincere Appreciation … for Your Kindness to Us”: A Japanese Canadian Family and the Administrative State","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kindness; State (computer science); Psychology; Political science; Law; Psychoanalysis; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.046562175609499844,"score_gpt":0.26850835917315746,"score_spread":0.2219461835636576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380228146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004835799,0.000017072953,0.000019718624,0.0073317857,0.00019672913,0.0029206907,0.0015500756,0.00008241575,0.9873979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20281406,0.00040628226,0.0002457799,0.0012199669,0.00025884603,0.000027168619,0.000043599503,0.000050281185,0.79493403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836713,0.00015980362,0.00018327698,0.00054052373,0.00034486465,0.00040442316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985897,0.00021615482,0.00021155135,0.00014700515,0.00031813185,0.0005174373],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022233478,0.0003529864,0.00048021795,0.00007610617,0.00236815,0.00014151349,0.00033813601,0.00028725876,0.0000028682095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010764324,0.00030027734,0.00012328624,0.000024259361,0.00047524078,0.00014311072,0.00023945754,0.0002937253,0.0000028402258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005635293,0.000006948373,0.00001541724,0.000101300146,0.00045176694,0.000053017924,0.07610613,0.000011343113,0.0000028680759,0.9179789,0.0017136678,0.0029951097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009636737,0.000073479714,0.00016413856,0.00006723203,0.00021551161,3.2134503e-7,0.023216352,0.000015116645,0.0000053289173,0.0008053164,0.9740427,0.00043082758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31581223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030697726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.972329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060146843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016745686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380234107","doi":"10.1515/9780773571686-015","title":"The Three Deaths of the Canadian Constitution","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; History; Genealogy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02682881430417118,"score_gpt":0.22918829925618497,"score_spread":0.20235948495201378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380234107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000012462868,0.000012361696,0.000002345396,0.0020938509,0.00049775786,0.00075407355,0.00023033157,0.000042398522,0.9963544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029893486,0.0002438621,0.000028351456,0.00013818606,0.00007349311,0.0000016769085,0.0000035429268,0.000013939388,0.9696035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983506,0.0001638505,0.00018620508,0.0002951585,0.0005739254,0.00043026466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985933,0.0001738349,0.00028852557,0.00036791727,0.00037864695,0.00019781997],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028182846,0.0002651031,0.00028722658,0.000048485217,0.0070225736,0.000056203768,0.00080404716,0.0004365575,0.000027400725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010019375,0.00018189543,0.00027346282,0.000022841003,0.0026574077,0.00007901419,0.00022181457,0.00045666646,0.0000074138497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008231352,0.000002309296,0.000034900546,0.000009118233,0.00013178168,0.000010711054,0.00070435036,0.0000037510135,5.2216944e-7,0.99505746,0.003626271,0.00041060225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016441588,0.00000958128,0.00011403286,0.000073635514,0.00015312144,3.302456e-7,0.00048783916,4.847691e-7,0.000024758343,0.0018328411,0.99690914,0.00022982867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6842719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26777923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99328285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014436258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003827677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99427015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380249182","doi":"10.1515/9780773592001-008","title":"Canada and Social Justice (An address given to Companions of the Holy Cross at a Retreat of Anglican Women in 1997)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Social justice; Political science; Gender studies; Genealogy; Sociology; History; Geography; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.02259380050069279,"score_gpt":0.2483959147220799,"score_spread":0.2258021142213871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380249182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07905907,0.0000028723666,5.493675e-7,0.0011842154,0.00022348322,0.0009861955,0.0033753947,0.00004841491,0.9151198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5678246,0.000019598221,0.000013178672,0.00011829936,0.000066320805,0.000002505656,0.000009835506,0.000016807411,0.43192887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980659,0.0002472024,0.00025348715,0.00038977852,0.000596245,0.00044739095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869365,0.00019838096,0.00035946816,0.00025433002,0.00027994963,0.00021424482],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023943135,0.0002729437,0.00061115186,0.0000647115,0.0014161984,0.000020130095,0.00064944755,0.00027366707,0.000018671732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005918561,0.0002440918,0.00011038669,0.00003464274,0.0010606762,0.00006452056,0.0007962645,0.00028651507,3.757997e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042008702,0.000044772856,0.0010484556,0.00043804816,0.00038852327,0.000045999415,0.06769459,0.00004558484,0.00006733844,0.91843516,0.010804721,0.0005667442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005237373,0.00005194012,0.009203346,0.00011948037,0.0001538514,2.1676061e-7,0.0042869253,0.0000015249459,0.000059058257,0.000052935367,0.9852175,0.0003294872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8515057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29707128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9744128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018408766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001938199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380249535","doi":"10.1515/9780773548398-004","title":"Table 1 Entries from <i>The Labrador Companion</i> in order of Cartwright’s page numbers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Order (exchange); Combinatorics; Mathematics; Arithmetic; Computer science; Database; Economics","score_opus":0.01832850782431083,"score_gpt":0.22669208846519806,"score_spread":0.20836358064088722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380249535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024037532,0.000020451795,0.000006949695,0.0014470795,0.00035584433,0.00075921783,0.0016377876,0.000106726424,0.9954256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022028368,0.0007083692,0.00009944119,0.00014306893,0.00018506453,0.0000028377638,0.000028299562,0.00003412922,0.9767704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977001,0.00026356513,0.0003314334,0.0005140543,0.00069304777,0.00049781246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801016,0.00059604796,0.0004191374,0.00038284285,0.00044656778,0.0001452619],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023173894,0.00040522972,0.00068001397,0.0000651372,0.001178109,0.000043160446,0.00082513527,0.00046581498,0.00030384038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008579859,0.00030189307,0.00019147004,0.00004823399,0.0013547015,0.0002169891,0.0005070921,0.00043442065,0.000026552108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070042726,0.00002049603,0.00020978441,0.000029282623,0.00025842,0.000053395288,0.0077380952,0.0000028666698,0.000013131919,0.98024213,0.010838795,0.0005235533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070803816,0.000015181641,0.00013631716,0.00027732347,0.00014082654,1.0585301e-7,0.002268859,6.1921213e-7,0.00011123289,0.00080324855,0.995134,0.0004042444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16583309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017635574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9842952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051179907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012405455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380270479","doi":"10.1515/9780773582521-008","title":"Newfoundland Aethodism and the Question qf Distinctiveness","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0207592850443103,"score_gpt":0.26046378111912505,"score_spread":0.23970449607481475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380270479","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006857411,0.000012050411,0.000070279406,0.001625113,0.00045804394,0.0008663837,0.00015248705,0.00016840007,0.9965787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009853414,0.0007187393,0.00024578287,0.000091256574,0.00033278918,0.000004495395,0.00001612069,0.000031536892,0.9887059],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799025,0.00042054438,0.00018833533,0.00051904604,0.0005141626,0.0003676456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983366,0.0005812066,0.0003059737,0.00029253346,0.0002957059,0.00018795699],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000589274,0.00038733144,0.000509081,0.000056874378,0.0036050067,0.0001205313,0.0004766056,0.0006273068,0.00003976342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014247299,0.00029683427,0.00020223341,0.00001401456,0.002863979,0.0001716584,0.0005056706,0.0008299199,0.000008618116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015025337,0.0000059592076,0.000024944222,0.000028361195,0.00012748821,0.000024432706,0.0027880515,7.5960764e-7,0.000002925626,0.9950146,0.0001446798,0.0016875487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009523697,0.00001714986,0.00032917818,0.000094019386,0.000284347,8.4384124e-7,0.0005882696,0.0000020217296,0.000007803429,0.005814093,0.99150467,0.00040522704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062682174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006222695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041472793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000515921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380370786","doi":"10.5406/2327753x.41.1.30","title":"Building Justice: Frank Iacobucci and the Life Cycles of Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Italian Americana","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Indigenous; Government (linguistics); Sociology","score_opus":0.033870499559593294,"score_gpt":0.34508214267974874,"score_spread":0.3112116431201554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380370786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8588777,0.00210903,0.000041460844,0.04002949,0.00052378536,0.0005160152,0.000032010914,0.0002601657,0.0976103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99786276,0.0004484494,0.00033326412,0.0006266001,0.00019044707,0.000015500274,7.9551194e-7,0.000007826038,0.0005143727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989076,0.00016650773,0.00016475799,0.00015553161,0.00032677964,0.0002788026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912393,0.0004990087,0.000109166955,0.00010271559,0.000058637997,0.00010651558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004241361,0.00009102417,0.00023038834,0.000022202888,0.0008350963,0.000048104663,0.00020572952,0.00003646141,0.000052701424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074440084,0.00005887189,0.00007100942,0.0004395101,0.0026755005,0.00010356952,0.0000900034,0.00008519668,0.000033256365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043693406,0.000026359654,0.0035884553,0.00007479255,0.00026592982,0.000008893085,0.11106327,0.000057032106,0.00036617962,0.84974086,0.024033906,0.010730633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002196243,0.00009735235,0.11522916,0.00012713266,0.0005664324,0.0000013318452,0.43115157,0.00044984513,0.00019925398,0.011965186,0.43718225,0.0008342608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0475644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013539232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83777565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003137165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030656476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98579925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382463566","doi":"10.1515/9781553392064-012","title":"The Crown in Canada Today: How Dignified, How Efficient?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Crown (dentistry); Medicine","score_opus":0.018335914793037953,"score_gpt":0.21007230079053532,"score_spread":0.19173638599749737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382463566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014409484,0.000012559717,0.0000072786393,0.00783636,0.00062561757,0.00088510156,0.00020828428,0.00010596577,0.9901747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11251649,0.00034119975,0.000018416004,0.00011716787,0.00016230672,0.0000035135342,0.000009185251,0.000033921795,0.8867978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970197,0.0002904734,0.00019409657,0.00063317275,0.0010451578,0.00081737404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803394,0.0005750309,0.0003630313,0.00044772352,0.00030461114,0.0002756348],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035593318,0.0004956286,0.00057153864,0.00007709775,0.0032198983,0.00019832751,0.0010914892,0.0004070772,0.000018413824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013771842,0.00040976246,0.0002287167,0.00003277581,0.0008391468,0.00008680009,0.0005790955,0.000725219,0.000006341098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005428329,0.000005724506,0.000026582888,0.00003375268,0.00015044337,0.00013063676,0.0013987661,0.00003170063,0.0000010117647,0.97800344,0.017856123,0.002307555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039990968,0.000015684735,0.000089628746,0.00010129879,0.00008021719,2.4576556e-7,0.0031208766,0.000009874739,0.000019411626,0.00009477284,0.99553263,0.0005354535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90350544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45953006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9779087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033794842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048096688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382466950","doi":"10.1515/9781553392064-008","title":"La Couronne au Québec de credo rassurant à bouc émissaire commode","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.02527208857189237,"score_gpt":0.2422684509486407,"score_spread":0.21699636237674833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382466950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020189509,0.000026312666,0.00017274299,0.0064789737,0.0005678399,0.0008937789,0.00053680164,0.00037821615,0.9889264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34133455,0.00049740076,0.00032196825,0.00024901965,0.00035934642,0.0000041886788,0.000021471747,0.000078752804,0.6571333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947485,0.0013091915,0.0005256737,0.0010560248,0.0009908809,0.0013697587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962916,0.0011077991,0.0006977934,0.00064885675,0.00046036128,0.00079361827],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008193869,0.0010376769,0.001300531,0.00012644459,0.005453022,0.0001052706,0.0014376092,0.0014210352,0.00021045876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016111971,0.0010837028,0.00076814886,0.00004247135,0.00445373,0.00023665016,0.0010126461,0.0014035042,0.0001106981],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015415181,0.00006252627,0.00035766274,0.0002160131,0.00076566014,0.00035497325,0.009589177,0.00008992481,0.000014812422,0.97912586,0.002851849,0.0064173997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011579184,0.000121814184,0.0008284802,0.00045595365,0.0007974812,0.000007036777,0.0030894068,0.00006333006,0.0000674184,0.00028716633,0.99187446,0.0012495485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.775477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016360024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9890226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054809144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005676999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382682270","doi":"10.1515/9780773570146-008","title":"Toronto's Legal Challenge to Amalgamation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03158040445935957,"score_gpt":0.24773974503379698,"score_spread":0.21615934057443742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382682270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00000738059,0.0000146925095,0.000016888325,0.0018057848,0.00042809345,0.0010150278,0.0002047388,0.00038188417,0.9961255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004829637,0.0011385671,0.00032899197,0.00015094077,0.00042348265,0.000004867067,0.000016012507,0.00004916418,0.9930583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997373,0.00014938839,0.00027628825,0.00069837645,0.00089021225,0.00061273546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984395,0.00010984891,0.0002744415,0.00038453788,0.00038480177,0.00040690321],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001904464,0.0005090307,0.000578906,0.00008505309,0.0019864254,0.000099681914,0.00070951117,0.00066692795,0.000668966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050682695,0.00055389636,0.00032063224,0.000016043216,0.00034761225,0.00043432057,0.00051141274,0.000416748,0.00013358162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033513807,0.000019187028,7.55459e-7,0.00003504211,0.00017452959,0.00007236432,0.005738268,0.0000058697938,0.0000013449935,0.9830991,0.007976905,0.0028431453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003243881,0.00007782211,0.000020479754,0.00012833366,0.00013547798,2.836904e-7,0.0013481595,0.000002838571,0.000014006776,0.00019752567,0.99709326,0.00065741315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055269487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003716003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9891164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022947737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039407692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382684771","doi":"10.9783/9781512823578-020","title":"Chapter 17 Equality for Indigenous Women: McIvor v. Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Pennsylvania Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Gender studies; History; Geography; Sociology; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.057543647278707186,"score_gpt":0.25729495922870155,"score_spread":0.19975131194999435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382684771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014412091,0.0001428422,0.000028311499,0.0002938569,0.0005206125,0.0015225211,0.001127698,0.00016274716,0.9947602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0097410735,0.0002471368,0.00012610674,0.000083162566,0.00020227293,0.0000037611676,0.000028054246,0.000040832616,0.9895276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978059,0.000053848806,0.00027162963,0.0004934216,0.0007412204,0.0006339613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823976,0.00031217866,0.00045919325,0.00029521825,0.00042893263,0.00026474617],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041230998,0.00034761545,0.00065427367,0.00006348366,0.0014334503,0.000034665652,0.0007852761,0.00038850796,0.00031030457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006275008,0.00039131552,0.00023750242,0.000010971776,0.0007259308,0.000081362305,0.00035110672,0.00028864798,0.000015645519],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023611126,0.000026306217,0.000024186482,0.0003939175,0.0010252368,0.00009664649,0.21464606,0.000008943704,0.000026632402,0.75543255,0.021081723,0.007001687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003989519,0.000057457983,0.00006105231,0.00007754998,0.00011133396,2.3124502e-7,0.007431417,0.000001649313,0.000010415905,0.0020724824,0.9893205,0.0004569479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85761774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93940735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9682388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011899368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064016477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382865101","doi":"10.1515/9780773556041-004","title":"Canadian Constitution-Making in the British World","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; History; Political science; Genealogy; Law","score_opus":0.024589887993251194,"score_gpt":0.24382370407442286,"score_spread":0.21923381608117165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382865101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000021678725,0.000007752985,0.0000015412018,0.0013316843,0.00032658078,0.0007024734,0.0002958992,0.00008820602,0.9972242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038576514,0.00015275567,0.000057421745,0.00047719234,0.0002740285,0.0000025105337,0.000013942105,0.000016261261,0.9604294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802,0.00019355326,0.00020114832,0.00046234473,0.00052514754,0.0005978312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989329,0.0001917483,0.0001767902,0.0002573928,0.00024050564,0.00020065237],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034539565,0.00028782862,0.0003507885,0.00016210598,0.005065045,0.00030270027,0.00084610865,0.0003664816,0.00027062316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007178345,0.00030161682,0.00018011371,0.00004579642,0.0014777709,0.0001725367,0.00020571554,0.0005699288,0.00004249249],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007614954,0.000004903726,0.0000333209,0.000013955823,0.00007257222,0.00045095157,0.0037433784,0.0000017873281,7.032575e-8,0.975156,0.01987626,0.00063919195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018725161,0.000010178026,0.00009009527,0.00033596595,0.00008030985,0.0000014931055,0.0022831773,6.162227e-7,6.818597e-7,0.0009681849,0.9956563,0.00038574234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90057755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70462316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97578007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020912038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003008055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382865251","doi":"10.1515/9780773560390-014","title":"Supreme Court of Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.030221757940809935,"score_gpt":0.24097876092381032,"score_spread":0.21075700298300037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382865251","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025722942,0.0000061769174,0.0000050808408,0.0005455679,0.00037170146,0.00050129055,0.00049359165,0.00009697726,0.9979539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00696604,0.0002430606,0.00013048491,0.00010062434,0.00015359397,5.4327154e-7,0.000014501936,0.000031195093,0.99235994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749154,0.00009012882,0.00029500932,0.00044662054,0.0010951052,0.0005816269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982223,0.00021858611,0.0004001277,0.0003059401,0.00055411644,0.0002989094],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002733522,0.0003847336,0.00060272403,0.00009368088,0.0013492402,0.000018678747,0.00067412946,0.0004972275,0.00015415993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058359376,0.00040969552,0.00023561475,0.000020185516,0.00075410353,0.00010041439,0.00037719338,0.00046328787,0.0000042362703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048069545,0.000009118789,0.000011625631,0.000058736507,0.0002776047,0.00013952004,0.0013557425,0.000005190193,0.0000026883251,0.97666395,0.020945458,0.00048227262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029165126,0.000022906162,0.000050944724,0.00011291754,0.0001555941,2.4730983e-7,0.0012461116,6.643893e-7,0.00009686659,0.00018795453,0.9973869,0.00044729398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89348286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.110871986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.976476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016986546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004151402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383336169","doi":"10.20884/1.jdh.2021.21.1.2878","title":"Rights of the Indigenous Peoples to Self-Government: A Comparative Analysis between New Zealand and Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurnal Dinamika Hukum","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Indigenous rights; Political science; Public administration; Human rights; Self-determination; Law","score_opus":0.01669315773775935,"score_gpt":0.27858160322916364,"score_spread":0.2618884454914043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383336169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99253273,0.00021271198,0.000004578745,0.0035308052,0.00010209413,0.00018058078,0.000045845223,0.00001024937,0.0033804118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928658,0.00004157074,0.00012724857,0.00008615206,0.00014040485,0.0000027069043,0.0000024230876,0.0000026153732,0.0067310655],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832857,0.00018305573,0.00021513294,0.00019217403,0.00080734043,0.00027376012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991573,0.00025474306,0.00014466442,0.000112238275,0.00012428482,0.00020676084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013783807,0.00011897107,0.00036502077,0.000016409558,0.0009059653,0.000068130365,0.00021059807,0.00004597673,0.000028241016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009318284,0.000076302786,0.0001013525,0.0006104245,0.00009404451,0.00007457784,0.00010572826,0.00011497289,9.4259303e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005670593,0.00002755456,0.8286512,0.000007786158,0.0009235501,0.0000067034784,0.16629851,0.00002630884,0.00008057105,0.0007208145,0.0031109266,0.00014040172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013929978,0.000017257973,0.92551136,0.00001618965,0.00039535572,4.695858e-7,0.015184998,0.0000024160604,0.0005877831,0.00007286071,0.057954688,0.000117329684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8595205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9916212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15111351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004872003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005465105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6968044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383337109","doi":"10.5325/victinstj.40.1.0207","title":"Rev. of <i>Reading for the Law: British Literary History and Gender Advocacy</i>, by Christine L. Krueger","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victorians Institute Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Icon; Reading (process); Publishing; State (computer science); Download; History; Library science; Media studies; Law; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Algorithm","score_opus":0.041248435891974036,"score_gpt":0.2985531244782445,"score_spread":0.2573046885862705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383337109","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2956054,0.48182726,0.007351317,0.011444762,0.06345423,0.0026770516,0.00023111791,0.00027412002,0.13713475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848881,0.0053027994,0.0012600686,0.00054262544,0.005753627,0.000022314007,0.00000430679,0.000016180515,0.0022100052],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866384,0.00009831929,0.00032092922,0.00012490587,0.00036825665,0.00042377482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908334,0.00020505974,0.00022282168,0.00008697503,0.00020360458,0.00019818441],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010500499,0.00012696242,0.00022554609,0.000021153362,0.0014556454,0.00011074539,0.00023260145,0.00010043266,0.00009937142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035979052,0.00009699928,0.00011535588,0.0000839457,0.00070859323,0.0009614306,0.00005199585,0.0002873617,0.0000026110974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071450806,0.00023248927,0.015185306,0.00016108515,0.0004826881,0.000012598611,0.22512639,0.0000046745154,0.0024333866,0.0549235,0.68256146,0.018804986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040998386,0.000018769157,0.0026186847,0.000049978233,0.00007273101,0.000029305029,0.0015038468,0.0000026674131,0.000026191543,0.0002956591,0.99483365,0.00013850778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034023197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007781324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6892827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003924003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013321938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383456423","doi":"10.1515/9780773571594-018","title":"The Canadian Constitution: What Is at Stake in the West?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.03174961614287194,"score_gpt":0.2403044116089876,"score_spread":0.20855479546611566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383456423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000020513467,0.00005055442,2.527151e-7,0.012313936,0.00045242222,0.0009477348,0.00022886872,0.000060553317,0.98592514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032702688,0.003194815,0.000013678664,0.0009428968,0.00015826005,0.0000045589622,0.000015690188,0.000016665517,0.96295077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771494,0.00020956699,0.00021154336,0.0004506027,0.0007658148,0.00064755615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864906,0.00026269327,0.0001993721,0.00039948444,0.00023739456,0.0002520207],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042823513,0.0003593738,0.0003188886,0.00008345101,0.008934037,0.0003336285,0.001046941,0.0005110995,0.00014164874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003579018,0.00025698455,0.00022144453,0.00003206279,0.0023844824,0.00029425774,0.00028192677,0.0006528698,0.000060605267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001701114,0.0000038035425,0.000010739392,0.0000098293,0.00008575148,0.00016006258,0.010422481,0.0000056723106,8.563255e-8,0.98523396,0.0033174308,0.0007331722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030848198,0.000015288007,0.00007847353,0.00015891249,0.00008631081,9.0127025e-7,0.007221557,2.4079114e-7,0.0000039700267,0.0013134406,0.9904692,0.0003431915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7644077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40904066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9871518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053313854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005035043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384079912","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4499109","title":"The Canada Disability Benefit Act and Women with Disabilities: Pursuing Disability Equality and Reducing Administrative Violence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Bureaucracy; Economic Justice; Political science; Income Support; Criminal justice; Inclusion (mineral); Order (exchange); Public administration; Business; Politics; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Finance","score_opus":0.025882486630221323,"score_gpt":0.31583444827376955,"score_spread":0.28995196164354825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384079912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879467,0.0006815506,0.000003291426,0.010310987,0.000107696775,0.00033174222,0.00001268121,0.000046321533,0.0005590673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949665,0.0043780487,0.000008659854,0.000023290937,0.00019561645,0.000044303455,0.0000010524922,0.000009820874,0.00037272173],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99576455,0.00045607536,0.00033346217,0.00038650527,0.00064799166,0.0024114314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975517,0.0017323745,0.00016469126,0.0001829332,0.00011208736,0.0002562576],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005196794,0.00020918828,0.0002717738,0.0000063290468,0.004139061,0.00027418084,0.0002896436,0.0000604807,0.000010236762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015812505,0.00012528065,0.000038066722,0.00030070174,0.0028368342,0.00034133965,0.00011971254,0.0010214266,7.4181696e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028099807,0.00006702679,0.75428957,0.000049459977,0.0002862936,0.0000017580027,0.07808725,0.000023658067,0.000014937184,0.08519454,0.000035572215,0.08166893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002781364,0.00024062599,0.319123,0.000057090554,0.00002329055,0.000011748814,0.5977397,0.000018313849,0.0000064316014,0.080997616,0.0012369265,0.00026710096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50046027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96770954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5196525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006309742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002115715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384202534","doi":"10.1515/9780773567993-007","title":"First Nations and the Derivation of Canada's Underlying Title: Comparing Perspectives on Legal Ideology","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.032097006483505004,"score_gpt":0.24338919048077312,"score_spread":0.21129218399726812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384202534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005961796,0.000009447927,0.0000040687382,0.0012543515,0.00006792988,0.00022871638,0.000032051248,0.000025869947,0.99831796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3543659,0.0004211247,0.000025895784,0.00003060175,0.000037144775,7.6282146e-7,0.0000029311427,0.000007693921,0.645108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933124,0.000059492326,0.0000896747,0.00016785288,0.0002226678,0.0001290513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999371,0.00028868538,0.000114320486,0.00008789233,0.00009958302,0.000038546925],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007284708,0.000116545045,0.00020077082,0.00004901595,0.0015198326,0.000015624946,0.00015462976,0.00011008495,0.00006406132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047215817,0.00009970134,0.00005200428,0.000012113651,0.00060721126,0.00004196297,0.00007779702,0.00017497297,0.0000015274182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023241186,0.0000023299926,0.0000040129953,0.000010576641,0.00007628208,0.000003767009,0.002453866,0.000026145415,1.03440925e-7,0.99651545,0.00078260264,0.00010161197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002593958,0.000008149463,0.00013339632,0.000057392033,0.000055331653,1.8119606e-7,0.0027676136,0.000011045969,0.0000023638167,0.0005633044,0.99602437,0.000117438976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47351274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07062018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9959521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040784583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007880387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384215026","doi":"10.1515/9780773568693","title":"Between State and Market","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Business; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.02326598230029598,"score_gpt":0.24665758593882903,"score_spread":0.22339160363853305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384215026","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000080312704,0.000007618011,0.0000064879996,0.0005376843,0.00016614127,0.0007078163,0.0006504194,0.00020536405,0.99763817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00071113213,0.0016266748,0.000116764364,0.00006832989,0.0002854581,0.0000019900724,0.00002575277,0.000035914134,0.997128],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973903,0.00039441636,0.00023546595,0.00064828387,0.0006621949,0.00066939794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984516,0.0003614462,0.00029662738,0.0002755552,0.00024192926,0.00037283677],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032707676,0.00045482014,0.00065192627,0.00011716271,0.0022370478,0.00009855854,0.000578168,0.0005333739,0.00013226821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006105892,0.00047416447,0.00019761517,0.000037274833,0.0010420617,0.00021840468,0.0006882796,0.00059071305,0.000021403604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021766638,0.00005086374,0.00092934497,0.0003896588,0.0017873562,0.0007241268,0.015526531,0.0000033290391,0.0000016287763,0.411311,0.54958844,0.01947005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004458063,0.000032322245,0.0005817896,0.000116353156,0.00024863816,3.0931741e-7,0.00087679236,5.186233e-7,0.0000057329084,0.00055132224,0.99656844,0.0005719968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020341547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005455094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44697997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012224007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012719528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384254841","doi":"10.1515/9780773597822-007","title":"The Constitution of Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.031453810292057516,"score_gpt":0.23769374672263913,"score_spread":0.2062399364305816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384254841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000005414005,0.000015363768,0.0000021575286,0.0009056507,0.00044129926,0.0004258156,0.00029975746,0.000054732893,0.9978498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009821194,0.00032904444,0.000023244234,0.000031102547,0.00009655154,7.879227e-7,0.0000072584853,0.00000994916,0.9896809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829507,0.00011882964,0.00019122624,0.00026013207,0.00079376006,0.0003409789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841183,0.00021197907,0.00032319126,0.00023671408,0.0006285405,0.00018776208],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027557753,0.00023443197,0.00033064585,0.000029177747,0.002403885,0.000024205558,0.0005290005,0.0002664846,0.000021990003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000107297725,0.00019138472,0.00012651105,0.000012219166,0.0014584536,0.00007700454,0.00028880753,0.00030060168,0.0000026737212],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026945585,0.000002518884,0.0000019392066,0.000013872844,0.00013489905,0.000025634348,0.00060120254,0.0000066940033,5.847125e-7,0.9666686,0.03206721,0.00044989397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020438775,0.000013862483,0.0000071868617,0.000060264316,0.00010336961,1.8268685e-7,0.0015216521,6.4640767e-7,0.000020295543,0.00066413195,0.99717355,0.00023045581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83940715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08273007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9660045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015363087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077390694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384497133","doi":"10.29173/crossings174","title":"Rooted Constitution: A look into the Living Tree Doctrine and Indigenous Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Crossings An Undergraduate Arts Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Doctrine; Constitution; Dismissal; Indigenous rights; State (computer science); Colonialism; Law; Political science; Sociology; Human rights; Ecology","score_opus":0.03390494428882619,"score_gpt":0.32550738994517375,"score_spread":0.2916024456563476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384497133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96637625,0.00071414,0.000087808454,0.0145561285,0.0005019297,0.0002124783,0.0000012818892,0.00017601966,0.017373987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99225503,0.00047508904,0.00019317011,0.00020562747,0.00071067247,0.000006112923,0.0000016087057,0.000008448333,0.0061442377],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808705,0.00023984944,0.00030913317,0.0002468062,0.0005312334,0.00058591855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988718,0.00027374696,0.00021540083,0.00012219574,0.00023081787,0.00028603247],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013293879,0.00018147701,0.00021033436,0.00008139335,0.015993873,0.002315651,0.0002821964,0.00008589735,0.000034889028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033966862,0.000112244576,0.00008871138,0.00048174034,0.0025787489,0.0008244733,0.00011386288,0.0003960763,0.000052937925],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000320415,0.0001364066,0.019749746,0.000023448772,0.0002358865,0.0003011103,0.866013,0.00008544032,0.0009824947,0.047667664,0.0142355645,0.05053724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011402601,0.00021030825,0.108657144,0.00030963132,0.00012434078,0.00025415613,0.053686913,0.00023956952,0.000108968976,0.08561432,0.7488936,0.00076078257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005232861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013420655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8123261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024471412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023454333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99872005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384704418","doi":"10.56544/jblr.2023.05.71.1","title":"Substantive Equality and Judicial Review: An Overview of the Supreme Court of Canada’s Equal Rights Jurisprudence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jeonbuk Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Judicial review","score_opus":0.11855370226922582,"score_gpt":0.39766696449005595,"score_spread":0.2791132622208301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384704418","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029869944,0.931871,0.0000010635102,0.021581609,0.00047270113,0.002273998,0.00016068068,0.000051048268,0.013717987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35486525,0.64271706,0.000023271072,0.0019480663,0.0000886175,0.000031343494,0.0000053041103,0.0000077488585,0.0003133203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99653745,0.0010719717,0.00068836747,0.00028334238,0.001053931,0.00036492903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833363,0.0003199485,0.0004842755,0.00033525954,0.00039888755,0.00012801262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026636652,0.00017997142,0.00085263525,0.000008708835,0.0006892296,0.000012632107,0.00050786085,0.000062314684,0.0001577713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007368471,0.00010862878,0.00016591753,0.00069256517,0.0008067167,0.00019305723,0.00017554445,0.00015483626,0.0000071731183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010277681,0.000080303296,0.0018685383,0.022746552,0.00015375605,0.0000073857486,0.006002754,4.8683427e-7,0.00007438399,0.8859638,0.079721004,0.0033707276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014758385,0.00003384335,0.014115332,0.019957809,0.00025918035,7.0676197e-7,0.0003496636,0.0000018697235,0.00011453991,0.0020409995,0.9627111,0.00026740556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71410346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91825086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8839228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015862421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004429545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5301066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384790460","doi":"10.1093/oed/8866927985","title":"Nova Scotia, n.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); History; Engineering; Archaeology; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.06446472084522203,"score_gpt":0.26698820555051955,"score_spread":0.20252348470529752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384790460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000065367596,0.000060143597,0.000009075706,0.00030017822,0.0007190658,0.0004681744,0.00009157842,0.00042386536,0.9978626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00059659337,0.00070857344,0.00009718912,0.00004667313,0.00036256723,3.212951e-7,0.000015928126,0.000039172766,0.998133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833184,0.000056503428,0.00015178796,0.00043422316,0.0005831311,0.00044250788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902195,0.00014551281,0.00018803857,0.00025058744,0.00020487433,0.00018902033],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018378187,0.00030306506,0.00037925958,0.00008864527,0.000900467,0.000077644734,0.0006522165,0.00050620857,0.00020089472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043253345,0.00032536537,0.00027249716,0.000016987235,0.0008079727,0.00011835467,0.00048989756,0.00042959634,0.00006663551],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001813042,0.000004176333,0.0000114106815,0.000027163003,0.00017903637,0.000092342554,0.0044897175,0.0000015329371,0.000001677439,0.9765485,0.015889935,0.0027363629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020835253,0.00001753359,0.00004125883,0.00009859399,0.00012769696,2.8892404e-7,0.0011825883,0.0000011811626,0.000004392251,0.0007886214,0.99714047,0.00038904083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012450344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014618517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004672593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000118184296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385249996","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-30002-8_1","title":"Radical Autonomy in Supreme Court of Canada Jurisprudence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"˜The œInternational Library of Bioethics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Autonomy; Charter; Sociology","score_opus":0.05860171173620505,"score_gpt":0.30636976904354946,"score_spread":0.2477680573073444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385249996","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008275587,0.0005465296,0.0000059643576,0.096955545,0.001856835,0.00045711792,0.0005861343,0.00007349426,0.8986908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17318048,0.0016950165,0.00033179784,0.0008081572,0.00065660675,0.000013478745,0.00009391494,0.000047265192,0.8231733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973151,0.00007782611,0.00055946736,0.0002613127,0.0015516717,0.00023462893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811786,0.0010681017,0.00040379516,0.00016854251,0.00015952694,0.000082158855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058467395,0.00019721877,0.0003578693,0.00008251566,0.0002114211,0.000038730734,0.0012336187,0.00037307618,0.00067046063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001477428,0.00015736814,0.00015107465,0.000084797146,0.002057368,0.00021947162,0.00035526304,0.000736342,0.000015577152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029470002,0.000020399986,0.0011281571,0.000052238414,0.00019811309,0.000022628525,0.007435784,0.000030027402,0.000008287813,0.94950634,0.041096505,0.00047205566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018412493,0.000020825337,0.002685771,0.0003405204,0.000022814005,6.576647e-7,0.0012960086,0.000088780434,0.00006151507,0.02479729,0.9702445,0.0002571714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3972651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6926431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.929148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032877247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031491127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75804573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385362892","doi":"10.1515/9780773571914-016","title":"Resolution to Amend the Manitoba Act Intoduced in the Manitoba Legislative Assembly by Attorney-General Roland Penner, 4 July 1983","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; General assembly; Resolution (logic); Law; Political science; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.03221025156567888,"score_gpt":0.25396118569878723,"score_spread":0.22175093413310834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385362892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018193463,0.00001818153,0.00000830262,0.003964506,0.0004086072,0.0020529544,0.00039151628,0.00011893846,0.9912177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18224512,0.0005564176,0.00012511775,0.0007683088,0.0007816917,0.000025731802,0.00007906303,0.000073624964,0.8153449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962659,0.000656483,0.00036120415,0.0008304681,0.0010864977,0.0007994466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982175,0.00037127282,0.00039377285,0.0005304329,0.0002785302,0.0002084408],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065202964,0.00063633197,0.0005853503,0.0001401765,0.0030715466,0.00021467816,0.0014954647,0.000553613,0.00002353164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010001882,0.0004633374,0.0003074501,0.00007522487,0.0008145462,0.00032405052,0.0006011419,0.001068658,0.000052860098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002638691,0.000064104584,0.000049573995,0.00003575144,0.00039916515,0.00012780324,0.027724337,0.00009106361,0.00006898276,0.9347057,0.03535632,0.001113359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066173164,0.00010083774,0.00052421633,0.00013474435,0.00018510161,8.951912e-7,0.0063260365,0.0000024711858,0.00006185171,0.000558479,0.9908209,0.0006227427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1921767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01176834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95546454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026313972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000114736205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385367737","doi":"10.1515/9781553394518-007","title":"Respecting Legal Pluralism in Canada : Indigenous Bar Association Appeals to Harper Government to Appoint an Aboriginal Justice to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Indigenous; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Pluralism (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Legal pluralism; Sociology; Legal profession; Legal realism; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014373876632554322,"score_gpt":0.23222544590446054,"score_spread":0.21785156927190621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385367737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018058242,0.000003245741,0.000007896684,0.013601541,0.000919353,0.003236644,0.0016787904,0.000055450357,0.9624388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17751928,0.000032733857,0.00020613377,0.0014789783,0.00030681436,0.000015980037,0.000010617487,0.00004209587,0.82038736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99576795,0.0002591473,0.00040895122,0.00058004825,0.0021683006,0.0008155882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788827,0.00027422575,0.0004069366,0.00034439974,0.00054091634,0.00054528407],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005845143,0.00040041696,0.000585215,0.00006556914,0.0015797755,0.00007799716,0.0008998757,0.0002180781,0.00007047646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019631787,0.00037415183,0.00008808855,0.000059015772,0.000059581118,0.00017360305,0.0003589617,0.0005033889,0.000006957569],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043445523,0.00006354432,0.0006492429,0.00020015422,0.0009159018,0.00042829037,0.11046034,0.0037720117,0.000072964205,0.7018215,0.1791419,0.0020397075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020688032,0.00005168705,0.0012156476,0.00012488935,0.0001324529,2.2773045e-7,0.014422823,0.0000033183912,0.000074621326,0.0000108988725,0.9832882,0.00046833442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80414635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028644636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021873487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385368179","doi":"10.1515/9781553394242-001","title":"Acknowledgements","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.02967689233155448,"score_gpt":0.25491243432330574,"score_spread":0.22523554199175125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385368179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003716065,0.0000055139258,0.000008831741,0.0006485207,0.0008584995,0.0006826946,0.00034552635,0.00032023274,0.99712646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00043532794,0.00072342326,0.000086684,0.00008819802,0.0005297035,0.0000023381772,0.00000957635,0.00004525728,0.9980795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976427,0.00014350832,0.00023296107,0.00064644794,0.00072183297,0.0006125775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981332,0.00015762265,0.0003074458,0.000376057,0.0007240555,0.00030161315],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001994029,0.00047266154,0.00052185863,0.000115639625,0.0021704342,0.000056214034,0.0008288481,0.0006112425,0.001373558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000100164296,0.00042485713,0.00034265438,0.000014341773,0.00088286155,0.00021659203,0.0007761478,0.00038422525,0.0009783724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034212248,0.000012414447,0.0000055348955,0.000034199453,0.00032379103,0.000059593858,0.0013322368,1.7812432e-7,0.0000024612443,0.95163715,0.042869374,0.003688826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050673337,0.000027242924,0.000016311673,0.00021039754,0.00018705499,9.260351e-8,0.0003656043,1.3657419e-7,0.000030837295,0.0010941522,0.99698395,0.00057751045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013785189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028643135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95411456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012276323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073818264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385470081","doi":"10.4018/978-1-6684-4163-3.ch001","title":"Attending School","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in educational marketing, administration, and leadership book series","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compulsory education; Political science; Convention; Public administration; School system; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Education Act; Pedagogy; Sociology; Law; Special education; Human rights","score_opus":0.07152378903292372,"score_gpt":0.33713502361674424,"score_spread":0.2656112345838205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385470081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001671974,0.032731254,0.0000024350488,0.038668785,0.0013891999,0.0006226102,0.000037029375,0.00015372226,0.92622775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011366135,0.043883473,0.0003807118,0.00047518636,0.001855083,0.00011015004,0.00011895841,0.000049671893,0.94176066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976345,0.0001838214,0.00053848606,0.00057957333,0.0005968315,0.0004668129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758404,0.0014489484,0.00037545455,0.00015369483,0.00022971,0.00020811768],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010869573,0.0003748672,0.00036715763,0.00014493098,0.0011415022,0.00020672129,0.0002431183,0.000312722,0.00164535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024082633,0.00039323058,0.00009471062,0.00009911031,0.0013319702,0.0016278792,0.0000440293,0.00046352568,0.00012513931],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017310596,0.000039409006,0.010070827,0.00052929984,0.00007345138,0.000010477061,0.01394017,0.0000042506445,0.0000022560105,0.9562248,0.016939813,0.0019921346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001174175,0.000040313058,0.0108559625,0.0005825945,0.000029630995,0.0000046989153,0.02520363,4.0495985e-7,0.0000016260996,0.020793486,0.9418848,0.00048542477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000086231434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00969215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9354313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034703335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008675679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385473246","doi":"10.4018/978-1-6684-4163-3.ch008","title":"Framework of Education Governance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in educational marketing, administration, and leadership book series","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; China; Public administration; Political science; Public education; Higher education; Management; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.052319556911075885,"score_gpt":0.33672905038010315,"score_spread":0.2844094934690273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385473246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027143824,0.07584215,0.000007406404,0.030389568,0.002201568,0.00070499437,0.0000656284,0.00007918905,0.8904381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033289492,0.08534318,0.001426354,0.00034943077,0.0013575994,0.000112852686,0.00009339565,0.00004206123,0.87798566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979343,0.00014949613,0.00057787047,0.00045647548,0.0005771034,0.0003047751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970413,0.0016703954,0.00065666856,0.00017455548,0.00034877533,0.00010832663],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075323123,0.000303331,0.00037011458,0.00008011292,0.0004911087,0.00007311458,0.00023957716,0.00034101028,0.00072720513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002717715,0.00032441362,0.00008694239,0.000115376235,0.0014029812,0.0011082108,0.00003208567,0.0003755076,0.000024027033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009639311,0.000051116363,0.0027429732,0.00045518417,0.000027064632,7.008113e-7,0.01064588,0.0000019045104,8.09016e-7,0.9783678,0.0039050619,0.003705094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006793593,0.00005051819,0.01749501,0.0013983503,0.000029636625,0.00000210532,0.019783,2.3319095e-7,0.0000049876735,0.101973645,0.85881597,0.00037861156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012462543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052869655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87639415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024580938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016038633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385510024","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1428","title":"Equality before the Charter: Reflections on Fraser v. Canada (Attorney General)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Supreme court; Charter; Sociology; Political science; Equal Protection Clause","score_opus":0.08100061302339426,"score_gpt":0.3664157798178432,"score_spread":0.2854151667944489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385510024","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020245424,0.08502603,0.000006572361,0.5244471,0.0045874277,0.0042446475,0.00047318224,0.00032828888,0.36064133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90593415,0.014142764,0.000055294964,0.06283828,0.0012103122,0.0009331834,0.000060617742,0.000031246054,0.014794165],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969879,0.0010265388,0.0003079143,0.0002879122,0.0009791291,0.00041062752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915624,0.00010410284,0.00013287111,0.00034590115,0.0001393736,0.00012152485],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013446697,0.00016458999,0.00030929077,0.000006905002,0.004893999,0.00004575057,0.0005223745,0.000030796,0.0023111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019487408,0.00010768965,0.00015982291,0.0003504585,0.00022897567,0.00009130535,0.0001670614,0.00037648427,0.00004240948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005076218,0.000076104945,0.0006386648,0.0002490947,0.00012946138,0.0000074808954,0.0065078004,0.000019572755,0.000008196426,0.49243543,0.4966231,0.0033000105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006766631,0.000029283536,0.00054808584,0.00010137241,0.000050838342,5.5634507e-7,0.0014680817,0.0000016263766,0.0000029635828,0.00028065383,0.9973175,0.00013136448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.867503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97696495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8856887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011013255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030745793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385510060","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1424","title":"Indigenous Peoples’ Transboundary Claims, Access to Justice, and the Canadian Constitutional Structure: The Uashaunnuat Case","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Supreme court; Indigenous; Law; Jurisdiction; Adjudication; Political science; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.03968060700097151,"score_gpt":0.3316240375522118,"score_spread":0.2919434305512403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385510060","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05346387,0.44693685,0.000030836454,0.4461743,0.0027378937,0.012287032,0.0019911106,0.00015045823,0.03622766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.959186,0.015856223,0.000035827397,0.02417779,0.00023412477,0.0002808367,0.000022716169,0.000008681969,0.00019776633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974129,0.000853493,0.0002855525,0.00027998316,0.00068143744,0.00048662216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987948,0.00044105586,0.00008741282,0.0002272486,0.00017967884,0.00026982298],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001556074,0.00018267769,0.0003444859,0.000019980454,0.016369889,0.00037939232,0.0007312582,0.00004703914,0.0013255548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030444178,0.00010273432,0.000113502836,0.00044812393,0.002715154,0.00020572131,0.00021408832,0.0004179245,0.000014986331],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024055076,0.000019700718,0.0004662777,0.0007354132,0.00016286853,0.00025656028,0.068988435,0.00004677207,0.000001302258,0.88455707,0.040640883,0.004100636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002421426,0.000012228921,0.00040467005,0.0001020229,0.00038350903,0.00022902357,0.0044201114,0.0000018316115,3.4799848e-7,0.00087550934,0.9931464,0.00018219982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5750226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9658936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9525055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006033858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012986453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512090","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1391","title":"From Ford v. Québec to the Act Respecting the Laicity of the State : A Distinctive Quebec Theory and Practice of the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Legislature; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.05270121961710043,"score_gpt":0.3456913995351534,"score_spread":0.29299017991805293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512090","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26606518,0.068979315,0.00019220902,0.64399874,0.00046381936,0.00525636,0.0001807966,0.00006607086,0.0147975255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900047,0.004025863,0.000064572814,0.005450791,0.00017324518,0.000033276167,3.5779217e-7,0.000011027877,0.00023617504],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99563086,0.0029190166,0.00037783483,0.0002392171,0.0006018322,0.00023126563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993578,0.005201984,0.0005023175,0.00035386847,0.00029701466,0.000066821995],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033769533,0.00015828968,0.00036291644,0.0000030582594,0.0014864489,0.000066155684,0.000783956,0.0000347809,0.00005318204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014773877,0.00005780119,0.00017987295,0.00041970017,0.0009923544,0.00020105332,0.00051853777,0.00032483682,0.000004315146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051367044,0.000092736744,0.006209235,0.0009540669,0.0008322885,0.0000024979847,0.79419804,0.000023336292,0.00063798804,0.16206583,0.009919864,0.024550432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017390536,0.00003706398,0.00763838,0.0017658299,0.0005007546,7.5830576e-7,0.050036717,0.000009485229,0.000210123,0.0014454467,0.9380038,0.00017773476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43049455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6044788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92808396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019828965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022621748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512103","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1384","title":"Whose Right is it Anyway? Adjudicating Charter Rights in the Context of Multiple Rights Holders","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Context (archaeology); Fundamental rights; Law; Political science; Reservation of rights; Censorship; Freedom of expression; Bill of rights; State (computer science); Law and economics; Human rights; Right to property; Sociology; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.06894310356870742,"score_gpt":0.3283241320384032,"score_spread":0.2593810284696958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512103","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063938364,0.17013176,0.000020554024,0.60331774,0.00065194786,0.008215347,0.00016665304,0.00024073945,0.15331687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972403,0.008377652,0.00011258388,0.01861536,0.000222807,0.000092877344,0.000009002591,0.000008678837,0.00015803208],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970504,0.00067573454,0.00065632735,0.000399092,0.0007633392,0.00045510486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985962,0.00042593858,0.00030382597,0.00029535565,0.0002256666,0.00015299272],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010543704,0.0002473931,0.0006844683,0.0000144710875,0.0008579997,0.000054083022,0.0007691781,0.00010216716,0.00097394997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035896167,0.00014299032,0.0002647806,0.00045333654,0.0006824469,0.0003248587,0.00008622881,0.000298666,0.00024358174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003470583,0.000359859,0.00339286,0.0030957994,0.00033502746,0.000054609718,0.36908415,7.85819e-7,0.00029138202,0.22861189,0.3906994,0.004039533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003687567,0.000033181153,0.000381212,0.0014650557,0.000078414276,5.482419e-7,0.0024848897,0.000017498927,0.00016951143,0.00037616558,0.9943977,0.0002270596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021031788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027059954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90846467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008668799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003966063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512271","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1343","title":"Issue 2: A Human Right to Self-Government over First Nations Child and Family Services and Beyond: Implications of the Caring Society Case","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Tribunal; Government (linguistics); Human services; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Child protection; Public administration; Economic growth; Law; Sociology; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.012023446822483264,"score_gpt":0.3079686206259714,"score_spread":0.29594517380348817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94519407,0.00020005422,4.1446273e-7,0.026299592,0.00006173791,0.00019848347,0.00003098904,0.000005580272,0.0280091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972781,0.00023704123,0.00007214506,0.0016781251,0.0005767364,0.000002173412,1.7772464e-7,0.0000044992453,0.00015101778],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992288,0.000050367107,0.00020433076,0.00008782358,0.00028365987,0.00014505986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994842,0.00007503626,0.00020932445,0.000047213423,0.000103160746,0.00008107816],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021482215,0.00008026648,0.000178579,0.000015079449,0.0031212538,0.00008445833,0.0001032369,0.00006718315,0.00000697747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017110957,0.0000544179,0.000086716056,0.00012495954,0.00020182447,0.00018521294,0.00012009252,0.00011767141,3.9685796e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060619495,0.000090023685,0.02175752,0.00013803746,0.0002764864,0.0000018500416,0.58251923,0.0000026645137,0.0007385201,0.3933695,0.00079368445,0.00030642026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012641028,0.00012601685,0.54997194,0.00013158357,0.00024108487,0.000055462093,0.12864882,0.0000067713745,0.00009871714,0.002761345,0.3163657,0.0003285031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021443669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026933704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5282144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016420834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030232079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512902","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3192","title":"The Wastelander Life: Living Before and After the Release of Daniels v Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Supreme court; Law; Colonialism; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Ecology","score_opus":0.015443737261227972,"score_gpt":0.2666168764971728,"score_spread":0.2511731392359448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6473824,0.0032516809,0.000008513386,0.058792785,0.001186997,0.00031043266,0.000012495947,0.000014073111,0.28904063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99770415,0.0005134775,0.000030601244,0.00026809738,0.00047808915,0.000004857092,6.831212e-8,0.0000059853046,0.0009946508],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987883,0.00017567143,0.00018828404,0.000091803224,0.00046067438,0.00029529308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894476,0.00029647566,0.00026613995,0.00018823038,0.00013892258,0.00016547849],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078724214,0.00009219145,0.00013078193,0.0000035255373,0.008606452,0.00047282976,0.00047826662,0.000046226418,0.00004978898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007472232,0.00004262411,0.00005631876,0.0000201846,0.0007993247,0.00022955582,0.00015834317,0.00028146693,0.0000012841942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016381683,0.00007750551,0.52673876,0.00005316238,0.0007638776,0.0001405474,0.09303896,0.000027493244,0.00004580552,0.32764798,0.01733992,0.033962127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005133819,0.000070462054,0.7900752,0.00027432205,0.00013633283,0.00005188048,0.05278883,0.00005845833,0.000022350037,0.010824332,0.14485233,0.00033213937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9415297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35032177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009380997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001808614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9926842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518197","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1073","title":"Equality Rights and Social Benefit Programs","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Supreme court; Law; Statutory law; Petitioner; Discretion; Political science; Premise; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.07514013986686569,"score_gpt":0.3631276397393052,"score_spread":0.2879874998724395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518197","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082147494,0.45758498,0.000019498211,0.22489864,0.0006227525,0.0050951373,0.00002794849,0.0008383201,0.22876522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9566183,0.031988483,0.0015431766,0.0044531478,0.0014469092,0.00016144762,0.000024160228,0.000018538607,0.0037458304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825734,0.00022329,0.0003190384,0.0002886387,0.00050468784,0.00040699498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939716,0.00005767669,0.00011500811,0.00011956324,0.00018995258,0.00012063503],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010080334,0.00017128645,0.00041992957,0.0000063277125,0.0018405443,0.000096497606,0.00022352465,0.00009710731,0.00029015314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005090261,0.00012604844,0.00014384912,0.00014056894,0.00065771875,0.00031128217,0.00009318327,0.00014411671,0.00014882791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004218887,0.00011457454,0.00065532484,0.001132223,0.000084236584,0.0000017968026,0.015359456,8.412285e-8,0.000008922353,0.85954446,0.008761896,0.11433281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120022996,0.0000126053665,0.00042688003,0.0003595619,0.00007032442,3.9768761e-7,0.00018211362,9.303878e-7,0.000004811459,0.0030590224,0.9955676,0.00019570309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01347537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042066224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98680574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017336359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024334024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385519106","doi":"10.1515/9780228002512-008","title":"6 Consensual Constitution? Contractual Thinking in the Interpretation of the Canadian Constitution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional interpretation; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.024897634626850268,"score_gpt":0.2439224325692092,"score_spread":0.21902479794235893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385519106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000052225823,0.000005274046,0.0000145648,0.0040804804,0.00036080307,0.0010293497,0.00035999762,0.00004514498,0.9940522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91905195,0.000048808375,0.000029688468,0.00057197263,0.00007596324,0.0000018910889,0.000016598244,0.000007094407,0.080196016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812347,0.00037788574,0.00027179386,0.00031163223,0.0006222968,0.00029292383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986609,0.0003839351,0.00034551718,0.0001992224,0.00028650486,0.00012392356],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003889892,0.00025191382,0.00035315772,0.00008664366,0.0026728367,0.00006817347,0.0006756071,0.0003918825,0.000020765685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026224155,0.00018919253,0.00019848892,0.00003605734,0.0030404823,0.00013227722,0.00016299002,0.00068028504,0.0000058374803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033657034,0.000005097688,0.00003119317,0.000018123897,0.00009111328,0.0000576881,0.0124720475,0.00003480706,0.0000013340824,0.98631316,0.00076615164,0.00017561631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039695785,0.000019253812,0.00013087621,0.00023762975,0.00017752552,0.0000016452656,0.0057865516,0.000017318303,0.000016918548,0.0015330235,0.991426,0.00025631208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51299936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07823702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99065983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011201185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006720696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385589491","doi":"10.59962/9780774868280-009","title":"7 Nova Scotia Court of Appeal","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Appeal; Nova (rocket); Law; Political science; History; Engineering; Archaeology; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.028554729077297104,"score_gpt":0.22597255948514758,"score_spread":0.19741783040785046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385589491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025127074,0.0005282307,0.0000030941164,0.00005935833,0.0003321596,0.00058793405,0.0009396923,0.0000686422,0.9949682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03783292,0.0006726164,0.000199565,0.000017637387,0.00009197007,2.8988094e-7,0.000025422674,0.000022832923,0.96113676],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998154,0.0000896002,0.0002486458,0.00037413414,0.0008440714,0.00028957034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987287,0.0000958418,0.00047410815,0.00020498886,0.00037541633,0.00012098156],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002551819,0.00013414513,0.00058292516,0.000030510573,0.00066265697,0.00006347469,0.0007021371,0.0002914152,0.004317906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030487585,0.0003102572,0.00031376263,0.000014722993,0.0017852564,0.000101034835,0.00057531195,0.00036849562,0.000008470004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001339176,0.00022175103,0.0011907136,0.00088451966,0.0021476166,0.00084310264,0.043016106,0.00001736253,0.000038916165,0.115977116,0.76788753,0.06764134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004501611,0.000059160917,0.00088827213,0.0002667414,0.0001877047,0.0000031557418,0.0023755021,0.0000010555232,0.0000010126637,0.00045314824,0.9949924,0.00032168467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90466124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8606738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22710486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029304315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018709268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385589498","doi":"10.59962/9780774868280-012","title":"10 Te Supreme Court of Canada’s “Gang of Five”","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01913731721462377,"score_gpt":0.20017066924607907,"score_spread":0.1810333520314553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385589498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00371671,0.00048772956,4.5308215e-7,0.000078620535,0.00015431459,0.00049276673,0.0020201367,0.000028197393,0.9930211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.049341135,0.00033757792,0.000063261774,0.000011648736,0.00004026846,5.226463e-7,0.000020242082,0.000016260696,0.9501691],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803764,0.000089474925,0.00028562578,0.00031051,0.0009976665,0.00027907602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983764,0.00013851195,0.0005879138,0.00020311403,0.00057274353,0.000121296645],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021899943,0.00012719724,0.0006384937,0.000025632176,0.0006690636,0.000025741108,0.0006806917,0.00021221732,0.006489011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060344064,0.0002781531,0.0002295853,0.000013887525,0.0011920583,0.00007644968,0.00047855455,0.000257785,9.65818e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010567215,0.00007434462,0.00019841162,0.0006233639,0.00121082,0.00036517906,0.020995818,0.000022490314,0.000023581955,0.015874749,0.94344246,0.017063132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037134672,0.000053300555,0.00076333847,0.00025528064,0.00016431772,0.000001535287,0.004497509,0.0000020863918,0.0000043046502,0.00016666406,0.9934553,0.00026501526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.998408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99900085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050012864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005198015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000977616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385590553","doi":"10.59962/9780774865982-004","title":"Métis Identity Captured by Law: Struggles over Use of the Category Métis in Canadian Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Identity (music); Political science; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.023434191374725345,"score_gpt":0.2167010319692788,"score_spread":0.19326684059455346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385590553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025202213,0.0014396289,9.840752e-7,0.00010994404,0.0003825326,0.0008815006,0.0042891814,0.00003107632,0.96766293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4158595,0.00050460076,0.000030840165,0.00008690558,0.00003552933,7.741003e-7,0.000033049895,0.000018218434,0.5834306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979466,0.00019332767,0.00026634586,0.00041495555,0.0006696017,0.0005091648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869376,0.00010844978,0.00032161962,0.00028699273,0.00036463168,0.00022453927],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021914337,0.00016465787,0.00054796494,0.000025694499,0.001124587,0.00026917766,0.0007146605,0.00052677316,0.00043660123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051966068,0.00029256992,0.00028331997,0.000027816419,0.0023910466,0.00029323704,0.0004630049,0.00041673798,0.0000012238571],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019604304,0.00007324735,0.0039008465,0.00030310595,0.0007498533,0.0006410259,0.019734738,0.000012662324,0.000045966568,0.81708074,0.15436615,0.0030720532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038031966,0.000010418401,0.0070164106,0.00046115107,0.00013186217,0.0000022998288,0.0017224988,0.0000014675826,0.000006329176,0.0011542218,0.9887544,0.00035863023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83438826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076383766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000373892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385593961","doi":"10.59962/9780774836340-047","title":"Publications of the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04157281743456436,"score_gpt":0.2213675569662526,"score_spread":0.17979473953168823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385593961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017972008,0.0005172919,0.0000034199895,0.0003963145,0.00033307317,0.0008802968,0.0013447229,0.000029603521,0.99631554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0134518035,0.00026296038,0.00021324019,0.00003515463,0.00009207578,0.000002239828,0.000014433091,0.00001386035,0.98591423],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989639,0.000028864451,0.00014839045,0.00025938996,0.00033974744,0.00025971106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983066,0.00007093024,0.00046625378,0.00033286255,0.0006695287,0.00015385139],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019729877,0.0000926533,0.0003109967,0.000014637744,0.001987152,0.00009944368,0.0010446795,0.00034997286,0.00022551243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008493495,0.00016652595,0.00059719716,0.000003863645,0.0024030996,0.00013178622,0.00018820264,0.00020977262,9.3595406e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002917109,0.000010591675,0.00010220748,0.0000841251,0.00031207092,0.000002037355,0.0077614943,3.4791506e-7,0.0000025303582,0.0780705,0.90859383,0.005057317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022141449,0.0000096666145,0.0016698621,0.00015244115,0.00017023485,6.249689e-7,0.0007211042,0.0000018594043,3.1268712e-7,0.0007157927,0.9961633,0.00017335285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99521023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99899536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087569475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011223113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012848161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385597739","doi":"10.59962/9780774867450-017","title":"Publications of the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.035267209067281056,"score_gpt":0.21022238197372434,"score_spread":0.17495517290644327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385597739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029309426,0.0010692017,0.000005296766,0.00043445258,0.00031479797,0.00075216877,0.001236578,0.000030446412,0.995864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0070591653,0.00034018845,0.00033425327,0.00006035494,0.00008078443,0.000002202715,0.000025915966,0.000014024463,0.99208313],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989168,0.00004069878,0.00016303347,0.00027323575,0.00035469892,0.00025150552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998417,0.00008887931,0.0002922198,0.00022974209,0.00082373974,0.00014839495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016384725,0.000089528316,0.0003125914,0.000014270536,0.0010525255,0.00007013149,0.00062803813,0.00033185567,0.00044198154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006722863,0.00016694903,0.0006356501,0.000012015372,0.00153602,0.00009193632,0.00017631531,0.00021347536,5.838501e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021694718,0.0000144735695,0.00007868144,0.000105131214,0.00038081774,0.000003688916,0.008035571,7.388966e-7,0.0000051176708,0.12790862,0.8599721,0.0034928818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019747329,0.000007957651,0.0008785307,0.00015915032,0.0001742075,8.9671016e-7,0.0018979332,0.0000019517565,6.095709e-7,0.0003370171,0.9961746,0.00016971616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99213105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13620244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012774463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016090005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8095281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385599155","doi":"10.59962/9780774880442-007","title":"The New Face of Aboriginal Law in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Law; Political science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.014122107906269311,"score_gpt":0.21158810888310858,"score_spread":0.19746600097683928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385599155","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029865846,0.0007886607,0.0000010594454,0.0001151258,0.00024326069,0.00050258165,0.00025610707,0.000012905236,0.9950937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050334413,0.0011462546,0.00003530164,0.000019600533,0.000042472173,1.5109416e-7,0.0000032373275,0.000009332218,0.94840926],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871266,0.0000547351,0.0001857632,0.00022606825,0.0005634308,0.00025737035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908894,0.00017361259,0.0002815169,0.00016374154,0.00019688426,0.00009531561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013259464,0.00009486753,0.00037588252,0.00000797285,0.00042883534,0.00006245459,0.0006077643,0.00016671956,0.00012499101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013336896,0.0001640733,0.000106623535,0.000009460185,0.0008465957,0.00006181573,0.00013200271,0.00025345728,0.0000018444196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088392524,0.000028095148,0.0014915594,0.00028523125,0.00066183106,0.0003498332,0.023312394,0.000035913108,0.0000071723302,0.41004318,0.5006286,0.063067816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031902644,0.00001341751,0.001282434,0.00026506715,0.000041630803,6.576625e-7,0.0028834525,0.0000013438357,8.787525e-7,0.00049435714,0.994521,0.00017671724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99994624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49389243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070394063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021516937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6690715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385599621","doi":"10.59962/9780774834407-009","title":"Appendix A: Abortion and the Canada Health Act","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Appendix; History; Geography; Biology; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.02051513913891187,"score_gpt":0.22597679570084706,"score_spread":0.20546165656193519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385599621","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008963063,0.0015777876,0.0000015582388,0.00079705496,0.0002318382,0.0007786511,0.0004281401,0.000031805,0.99525684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03279429,0.0040609147,0.00002753061,0.00007703387,0.00009549997,5.1814e-7,0.000014825805,0.000010248078,0.9629191],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987719,0.00009978855,0.00014403742,0.00026382695,0.00047798123,0.00024248115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988986,0.00009951694,0.00049505587,0.00019400915,0.0001813208,0.00013146276],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003228003,0.000098314,0.0004291958,0.0000072110815,0.00273284,0.0002087534,0.0004584912,0.00016458923,0.0001354493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044362692,0.00015884652,0.000098904675,0.000002289027,0.0020996141,0.00007941099,0.00023695317,0.00024713122,0.0000015290602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007369059,0.000013814483,0.00031775635,0.00025656546,0.00061678456,0.00018064679,0.021310298,7.620432e-7,2.586002e-7,0.048902918,0.74250966,0.18581684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006273065,0.000012207411,0.0026858463,0.0002606774,0.0000664614,0.0000026005107,0.0012316073,0.0000012418311,4.0700183e-8,0.000597821,0.9943433,0.00017089403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25183362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003784389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069559785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385600489","doi":"10.59962/9780774831956","title":"Parole in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.014879975383194327,"score_gpt":0.19678598679248432,"score_spread":0.18190601140929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385600489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004049186,0.00040422872,8.3984435e-7,0.00007020361,0.00022739351,0.0004313047,0.0005812266,0.000032702457,0.9942029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014955831,0.00063130475,0.00003139765,0.00002663673,0.00009285973,7.9497596e-7,0.0000074119944,0.000011672844,0.9842421],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845845,0.00013028631,0.00017183468,0.00031534935,0.00055211387,0.0003719731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917936,0.00013686452,0.00021157858,0.00014353587,0.00019462104,0.0001340349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014292188,0.000100571706,0.0004275666,0.00001560828,0.00039302724,0.00005963125,0.00054719055,0.0002344103,0.0003635674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041266318,0.00020468833,0.00010324523,0.000013298402,0.0006329044,0.00007839346,0.00022473665,0.00021793364,0.000003884249],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000088459665,0.000012274662,0.0012658156,0.000073688236,0.00010101734,0.00039187598,0.0033332242,7.1804106e-7,0.0000010057494,0.0005529278,0.9596561,0.03460251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004132699,0.000008322474,0.004380526,0.0005064655,0.000033634267,8.556215e-7,0.0017657091,5.2211414e-7,2.8584162e-7,0.00031122073,0.99231553,0.00026365058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03433886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026476213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030047148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8346948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385601142","doi":"10.59962/9780774829618-007","title":"The Baby and the Bathwater: The Repeal of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.01852682353061394,"score_gpt":0.20894901184026365,"score_spread":0.19042218830964971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385601142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02621713,0.00029998482,1.1564931e-7,0.0004392324,0.00029865967,0.0009171849,0.00020752683,0.000012129299,0.97160804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53296554,0.00016608827,0.0000020245413,0.0000075158937,0.00007384632,6.659076e-7,0.0000013710489,0.0000051161473,0.4667778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986799,0.00023750233,0.00018678397,0.00020672867,0.00047092407,0.0002181779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983893,0.00021139416,0.0005796852,0.0004073003,0.00034267147,0.00006967051],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063032657,0.00010335332,0.00031125435,0.000010562605,0.010091355,0.0002305513,0.0010943407,0.00024106306,0.00004915433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049627815,0.000084367275,0.00022913521,0.0000063433,0.0073109344,0.00006903138,0.00032286422,0.00034037657,2.8026662e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002984183,0.00006630556,0.003254438,0.0004307255,0.0041788206,0.00011272628,0.27089146,0.000007815528,0.000053128322,0.40693027,0.2574605,0.05631539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005242802,0.000022292428,0.012035767,0.00025174586,0.0002169396,0.0000034583472,0.0015988498,0.000002039937,0.000004321368,0.0045464,0.98065,0.00014390351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99978995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7231895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014729003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013660757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385721707","doi":"10.59962/9780774814904","title":"A Perilous Imbalance","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.01933159360477415,"score_gpt":0.21629161030160346,"score_spread":0.1969600166968293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385721707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06075331,0.001489157,0.000011251373,0.0001487453,0.001341964,0.0009778517,0.0011707403,0.00015069514,0.93395627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057665925,0.0018362844,0.0010340998,0.00004881805,0.00045139712,0.0000017900128,0.000025805066,0.000034496017,0.93890136],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701077,0.00031505164,0.00033952747,0.0007558465,0.00084774307,0.0007310463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780905,0.00022343358,0.00059720123,0.00036013607,0.000675997,0.00033419862],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002970083,0.0002748313,0.00093581155,0.000021569,0.0018611359,0.00027766003,0.0012258145,0.0010846748,0.0012592329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009669028,0.00064901356,0.00051657896,0.000043984805,0.0069870623,0.0002144418,0.0006618236,0.0010366138,0.00004907761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010207608,0.00050214113,0.003483017,0.0015627298,0.0017242781,0.0018827851,0.054445006,0.000008478987,0.00022942339,0.016392007,0.67672545,0.24294263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072339486,0.000085618776,0.009174496,0.0006981222,0.00030393666,0.000021270798,0.0025516185,0.000013852085,0.000002024679,0.000342478,0.98540443,0.00067876966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89108443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9038974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30867898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005748494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045331617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385744818","doi":"10.59962/9780774827515-020","title":"Publications of the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.030985430945418103,"score_gpt":0.20565707425916566,"score_spread":0.17467164331374754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385744818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002240794,0.00039418295,0.000017184298,0.0003786044,0.00029272892,0.00086514244,0.00088253117,0.000037050555,0.9969085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016790798,0.00015942969,0.00027826466,0.000067095294,0.00009697824,0.0000022561894,0.00001564364,0.00001492753,0.9825746],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892783,0.000041449253,0.00016620956,0.00025774288,0.00034602493,0.00026071962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851996,0.00010142235,0.00034483054,0.00023403925,0.000643483,0.00015628664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022044261,0.00009319623,0.00031520514,0.00001648375,0.0010735262,0.00005750274,0.00073689036,0.00034263643,0.00025678662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000651769,0.00016715753,0.00057709194,0.000008830615,0.001799522,0.000070224916,0.00014385379,0.00020086378,0.0000011032234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023107436,0.000007455793,0.00006861199,0.00008280956,0.00023124664,7.76345e-7,0.005719744,7.090919e-7,0.0000023980385,0.13461642,0.8551039,0.0041636024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021680901,0.000012002003,0.0009161318,0.0001243533,0.00016221871,5.516489e-7,0.0007241607,0.0000038723942,3.145076e-7,0.00055756787,0.99710727,0.00017474768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9925005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99832356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14200334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011147999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092617987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8256804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385745490","doi":"10.59962/9780774818605-016","title":"Publications of the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.04406115400459649,"score_gpt":0.20605329663476699,"score_spread":0.1619921426301705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385745490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021239344,0.000547748,0.0000062268077,0.00018168669,0.0002808601,0.00087511423,0.0010670036,0.000035372716,0.99679357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013638529,0.000271344,0.0002703903,0.00004500334,0.000067726665,0.0000024533795,0.000012978269,0.000015064907,0.9856765],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998984,0.000033274446,0.00016378329,0.00025434623,0.0003023052,0.0002622868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985589,0.00006462636,0.00033854524,0.00022943494,0.0006515887,0.00015690833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017596953,0.00009358027,0.00029399132,0.000017050672,0.0010090335,0.00004340957,0.0007604713,0.0003490149,0.00047440152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004545572,0.00016773317,0.0005754774,0.000009019448,0.0019204787,0.00010500292,0.0001553927,0.00020348493,0.0000011866906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036857105,0.000014758275,0.00009958629,0.00008225943,0.0003295527,0.0000016074443,0.013750396,2.0634208e-7,0.0000023869695,0.1568724,0.82466376,0.004179382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019281189,0.000012300727,0.001326307,0.00011501731,0.00017913828,6.2191884e-7,0.00090594165,8.9003044e-7,4.6343686e-7,0.0011605696,0.9959298,0.00017616818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99582356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99857455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.171266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010453403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010789485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7760773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385747433","doi":"10.59962/9780774824149-012","title":"Pathways for Greening Canada’s Constitution","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Greening; Constitution; Geography; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04053576557805497,"score_gpt":0.21098778235236873,"score_spread":0.17045201677431376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385747433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004250054,0.00090343424,0.000047550748,0.000042505308,0.00038417755,0.0008365021,0.0013957506,0.000065554574,0.9958995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05429535,0.00044307948,0.00042941142,0.00002819917,0.00023080579,0.0000013965891,0.000038924936,0.000013832084,0.944519],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875885,0.00003605073,0.00016130012,0.00026473362,0.0004365559,0.00034248363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989076,0.00011762501,0.00028044923,0.00011459812,0.0004144544,0.00016524718],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017787791,0.00011484982,0.00037199366,0.000012475411,0.001281741,0.00007761588,0.00031837888,0.0003037713,0.00018932729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045805842,0.00025631275,0.00016863241,0.0000045532165,0.0010224379,0.00010589447,0.00014310227,0.00017733956,0.0000013765822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049643564,0.000033143773,0.00028187348,0.00041804984,0.0007411436,0.00017361979,0.012836212,0.0000037896564,0.000015271165,0.32613945,0.4866766,0.1726312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034956005,0.000015593283,0.0003153214,0.0002655377,0.00016539483,0.0000022708007,0.0012455884,0.0000015373353,9.525246e-7,0.0005333316,0.99680865,0.00029626483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99774426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5101321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059759425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008002687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385747660","doi":"10.59962/9780774816762-015","title":"The Road Not Taken: Aboriginal Rights after the Re-Imagining of the Canadian Constitutional Order","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Political science; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.015148162067506884,"score_gpt":0.22150571228528743,"score_spread":0.20635755021778054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385747660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020027896,0.00031688382,0.0000018218786,0.0010769077,0.00066738616,0.0006769256,0.0006636086,0.000022023518,0.9945716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37704358,0.0001286555,0.00006925428,0.000088403925,0.00015314552,0.0000019517076,0.0000037137438,0.0000073470937,0.62250394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983014,0.00011709353,0.00020283388,0.00027358832,0.0007563621,0.00034876444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826026,0.00017531287,0.00032127323,0.00029914646,0.0008072426,0.0001367756],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036623527,0.00013714045,0.00027578918,0.0000151058875,0.005142657,0.00026790256,0.0010427063,0.0003344059,0.00044673274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053693766,0.00014153203,0.00022229335,0.000020468693,0.012654816,0.00008977983,0.00017585636,0.00071006076,0.0000048846873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017929805,0.000050655854,0.0011835255,0.00011358282,0.001618809,0.00040592658,0.075755924,0.000011614357,0.000019997096,0.80079544,0.09468871,0.025176538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021141178,0.000007413341,0.0036285857,0.00018416562,0.00012757297,0.000005485145,0.0010718049,0.0000019759,0.0000015032166,0.0012364213,0.9933326,0.00019103868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98987883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99946374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8986439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028810068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011994854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385854099","doi":"10.59962/9780774851060-017","title":"Publications of the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; History","score_opus":0.032643504860937964,"score_gpt":0.21001738045300103,"score_spread":0.17737387559206308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385854099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024916537,0.00074017845,0.000004476109,0.00052268873,0.00023273802,0.0009044878,0.0012016775,0.000037936377,0.9961066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010085652,0.00031677948,0.00040164273,0.00006787399,0.00012758793,0.0000022818424,0.000015734086,0.000014983998,0.9889675],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989091,0.000031627256,0.0001722622,0.00025794058,0.00035682425,0.00027225685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986165,0.0000785411,0.00032357228,0.00021790569,0.0006064784,0.00015696233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017562202,0.000095213596,0.00029670325,0.000017503939,0.0010673443,0.000056908797,0.0007194647,0.00034640552,0.00040728104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046494137,0.00017362718,0.0005883278,0.000009859379,0.001719074,0.000114098875,0.00013991908,0.00021487453,0.0000011402088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028076622,0.000013845885,0.00006513259,0.0000641029,0.00027955679,0.0000012416465,0.008086423,0.0000012740688,0.0000025918512,0.08614106,0.89824295,0.007098985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022276331,0.000009568588,0.0010004787,0.00011127395,0.0001624594,6.868172e-7,0.0009876791,0.000003098251,3.3248304e-7,0.00033987444,0.9969837,0.0001780707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99142236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098740734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015383409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011425925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8209257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385863077","doi":"10.59962/9780774857222-015","title":"From Time Immemorial: The Recognition of Aboriginal Customary Law in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; History; Genealogy; Political science","score_opus":0.014961581696086388,"score_gpt":0.2055908906746799,"score_spread":0.1906293089785935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385863077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019015912,0.00031443327,2.1531015e-7,0.000092831164,0.000268748,0.0005206955,0.0014723652,0.000023518794,0.9782913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061521407,0.0010509557,0.00015165027,0.00009735666,0.0004230835,9.1275723e-7,0.00009745564,0.000021494392,0.9366357],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986166,0.00011286992,0.0002285649,0.00026858647,0.0005536996,0.00021969448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989983,0.00017884874,0.00033507048,0.00014613249,0.00026946192,0.00007217225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016086634,0.000111376765,0.00043781105,0.0000130242115,0.00037068996,0.0000501472,0.00046589,0.00022071568,0.00048367342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014778672,0.00019390433,0.0001232056,0.0000128176225,0.0007921128,0.000089206995,0.00008238142,0.00028325542,0.00000389545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029531453,0.00012413893,0.00027417755,0.0001983475,0.0010796717,0.0013333312,0.035090197,0.00001091374,0.000059130864,0.009915356,0.4999286,0.45169082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059052074,0.00002637518,0.0020957417,0.0006152367,0.0001602657,0.0000012499191,0.0021098473,0.0000029113303,0.000003998699,0.0033921415,0.9906861,0.00031558945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49075752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007155555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000721242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7907189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385867979","doi":"10.59962/9780774856010-001","title":"Preface","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.030437995115857715,"score_gpt":0.21732785829788376,"score_spread":0.18688986318202605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385867979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010547235,0.0010122121,0.0000031602488,0.00003977492,0.000250518,0.00056062255,0.00033073535,0.0001449222,0.9966033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040678172,0.0054211346,0.00023953365,0.000020420337,0.00019423968,4.5298566e-7,0.00001051063,0.000022232623,0.9900237],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843246,0.000062758125,0.00017491974,0.0003952563,0.00062047824,0.00031412556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890614,0.00007932754,0.0002824272,0.00019733925,0.0003723709,0.00016240453],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000113390044,0.00013718834,0.0004672153,0.000018314815,0.0011514763,0.00010204259,0.0005669242,0.00049325335,0.00066250813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032216052,0.0003201447,0.00027139438,0.000007732126,0.0018854034,0.0001076549,0.00030352737,0.0003317572,0.000017457762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018579838,0.000034037243,0.00007331569,0.000110642985,0.00041942007,0.0005003425,0.020507734,0.0000016993364,0.000003765912,0.0052007753,0.93495667,0.03817301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031678178,0.000026035766,0.0005349131,0.0002715322,0.00009579427,0.0000056103668,0.00082218216,5.623243e-7,4.2334335e-7,0.00019605663,0.9973918,0.00033830476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7532862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7433379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062435124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002607565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015584395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385868121","doi":"10.59962/9780774855129","title":"Diversity and Equality","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Geography; Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.04188262165677856,"score_gpt":0.24561378599166434,"score_spread":0.20373116433488578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385868121","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021458773,0.0006149332,0.000015220056,0.000021859134,0.00017135717,0.0005141493,0.00031151544,0.000110791356,0.9767814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024642296,0.0009985742,0.00014330825,0.000032423228,0.000114036724,1.6587857e-7,0.000009633213,0.000010650057,0.9740489],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821895,0.00016387542,0.00016737514,0.000418867,0.0006672065,0.0003637085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880946,0.00017508795,0.0002796985,0.00016042734,0.0003598765,0.0002154582],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005295378,0.00012594953,0.00047862434,0.000023448112,0.005206384,0.00008850853,0.00050435273,0.000509833,0.00015066603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005615763,0.00029149035,0.00017620926,0.000016887354,0.002564819,0.00012809067,0.002946838,0.00033306392,0.00000244727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008686827,0.00013769006,0.008769928,0.00081089215,0.001026987,0.0006759385,0.18121307,6.085903e-7,0.0000024380893,0.014674364,0.6949282,0.09767297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000462391,0.000027494325,0.012489445,0.00023449604,0.0001793536,0.0000021649364,0.0031533919,6.052819e-7,2.3088674e-7,0.0009688393,0.9821232,0.00035837342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9171837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89447314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28719497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042694478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014460926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385868998","doi":"10.59962/9780774855525-010","title":"Inuit Petition for Their Rights","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027881253782759515,"score_gpt":0.21435235581173104,"score_spread":0.18647110202897152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385868998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022266961,0.0004913649,0.000014844776,0.000041160536,0.00021756932,0.0011236334,0.0015245464,0.0001232516,0.99423695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017912803,0.0014967034,0.0003006413,0.000017173674,0.00021479448,0.0000019727659,0.00003414811,0.000018306224,0.9800035],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987715,0.000046506608,0.00016874837,0.00036116838,0.00037392697,0.00027815453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884665,0.00013056544,0.0002741119,0.00014753299,0.0004846126,0.000116500894],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000117455485,0.00013543274,0.00042993762,0.000021876866,0.0015366704,0.00009766716,0.0004129774,0.00041568463,0.00035436294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002053489,0.00026705072,0.00032942352,0.000006533618,0.0012989425,0.00010929583,0.00014397787,0.00019280231,0.000005987336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086135624,0.000086386164,0.000029698362,0.00033232648,0.00091221166,0.00026347718,0.09273228,0.0000023557782,0.00000948193,0.04098177,0.7924412,0.07212268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044809448,0.00004521689,0.00019106898,0.00030640856,0.00009149105,0.0000039671813,0.0009188046,0.0000015691874,0.0000014443141,0.0032707183,0.9944048,0.00031640215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5853464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31955364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032386105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012413325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385870735","doi":"10.59962/9780774818667-013","title":"Publications of the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03032193610760755,"score_gpt":0.2077350729438286,"score_spread":0.17741313683622104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385870735","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005061877,0.0003530459,0.000004991175,0.00040895454,0.00041647974,0.0009476499,0.00129502,0.000037580354,0.9960301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010939339,0.00016515522,0.00051948783,0.000052054962,0.00010025274,0.0000024228702,0.000016326323,0.000015351752,0.98818964],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989472,0.00002808717,0.0001608238,0.00025694253,0.00034441758,0.0002625519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984754,0.00008748119,0.00033131227,0.0002437406,0.00069711846,0.0001649568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019311988,0.00009350588,0.00029117527,0.000016855185,0.001253924,0.00006213753,0.0007784351,0.0004698623,0.00038458357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000065791704,0.0001676393,0.0005719607,0.000009188471,0.002254583,0.00010032613,0.00015304651,0.00033785528,9.42349e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004413157,0.000020833046,0.00013380937,0.00011941849,0.00040384577,0.0000023098198,0.013523992,3.972381e-7,0.000028176688,0.1358342,0.8447601,0.0051684706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020327151,0.000009379484,0.0010853972,0.00008899199,0.00015446362,7.320215e-7,0.00082899147,0.0000013322286,0.0000011335036,0.000722119,0.99672973,0.00017443966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.993648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15196961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086966605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012200625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9644296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385871457","doi":"10.59962/9780774818667-009","title":"Judges of the British Columbia Court of Appeal, 1909–2009","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.018072619355742465,"score_gpt":0.20858697680260938,"score_spread":0.1905143574468669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385871457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050519932,0.00085653266,0.0000019193556,0.000071869035,0.0004881663,0.0012562134,0.0022198735,0.00007606113,0.94450945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08728044,0.0013297417,0.00024102633,0.000028906717,0.0001249766,0.0000012120665,0.000014282649,0.00003277627,0.91094667],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974303,0.00014035135,0.00046229176,0.00048907276,0.0010733915,0.00040459775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722594,0.00015552161,0.0010264338,0.00043043873,0.0010028982,0.00015877085],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037526342,0.00016737758,0.00090449257,0.000017039481,0.001814002,0.00043949884,0.001359048,0.00078404247,0.00097565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012325229,0.0003784782,0.0005672762,0.000030200856,0.005070637,0.00012705523,0.00068798516,0.0006502786,0.000002769055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058114652,0.00037036792,0.012849289,0.0013805212,0.0019109629,0.00028888776,0.016585896,0.000003315394,0.00034440888,0.0043439656,0.87553364,0.086330615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077509583,0.000068336296,0.021785134,0.0013619727,0.00039427436,0.000011635305,0.0019938408,0.0000010159212,0.000010699172,0.0014834815,0.9716163,0.00049818726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97125876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99468875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09608267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015593243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028702678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385989711","doi":"10.22215/cjcr.v10i1.4231","title":"Decolonizing Discipline: The Normalization of Violence Against Children, Church Parties to the Settlement Agreement, and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s Call to Action 6","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Children s Rights / Revue canadienne des droits des enfants","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Colonialism; Law; Corporal punishment; Commission; Power (physics); Normalization (sociology); Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Faith; Social science; Theology","score_opus":0.024486361631096812,"score_gpt":0.2781286725375885,"score_spread":0.2536423109064917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385989711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99096346,0.0006396882,0.00002860499,0.0069667776,0.00035573327,0.0007095931,0.000099911624,0.000007837271,0.0002284154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99838436,0.0008469904,0.000053536183,0.00016766385,0.00027575766,0.000020044026,0.0000121375015,0.0000096511285,0.00022986683],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825233,0.00034191334,0.00046102106,0.00019222064,0.00021996605,0.00053257024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981828,0.00033774236,0.00031252633,0.00016849821,0.00036183602,0.00063663867],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018193143,0.00016517083,0.00026894646,0.00015265135,0.0030322243,0.00017176363,0.00042780297,0.00006191497,0.000017518172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010257085,0.00008658198,0.00006826189,0.0006294644,0.00081730343,0.0002559208,0.000060067687,0.00018937646,0.000003063587],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013408787,0.00001938658,0.37194338,0.000057279,0.0005126774,0.000015657162,0.52247816,0.002535865,0.00007428083,0.010554279,0.003963021,0.08771194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005464873,0.000093246745,0.98412955,0.00046128203,0.00009573181,0.000027577402,0.006707197,0.00012332844,0.000100445635,0.0017834816,0.005742827,0.00018884306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13824439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9124404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.774196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006274553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018859006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386038996","doi":"10.55400/iayfjmaimjf.v1i1.29","title":"CHILD PARTICIPATION IN FAMILY AND CHILD PROTECTION MATTERS IN ONTARIO, CANADA","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Chronicle - The International Association of Youth and Family Judges and Magistrates´ Journal on Justice & Children´s Rights","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child protection; Political science; Family law; Economic Justice; Criminology; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.01626860685788847,"score_gpt":0.24719988425341893,"score_spread":0.23093127739553046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386038996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96822256,0.0005162491,0.0000022884199,0.028853215,0.00037080856,0.00032728672,0.000047458863,0.0000062733284,0.001653886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755585,0.000422582,0.000004973344,0.0015820197,0.00015520575,0.000017279808,0.000012483204,0.0000054767784,0.00024412145],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982336,0.00029166235,0.00036929938,0.00017818644,0.00067273923,0.00025446736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992144,0.00017333461,0.00039977,0.000059248017,0.00008711909,0.000066117944],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011311951,0.00013190077,0.00017067778,0.000057530564,0.0016359991,0.00014383241,0.00021435923,0.000044051765,0.000034134246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000099218945,0.00008539649,0.000035114208,0.00013056913,0.00013083099,0.00019230264,0.00007752751,0.00066489034,4.470958e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012972088,0.0010791009,0.71908844,0.000066053886,0.0010586304,0.00004063035,0.22409096,0.009254565,0.00045586785,0.030147104,0.0079907,0.0054307263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009895558,0.00008442307,0.9807136,0.000052394036,0.00007063996,0.000010210281,0.0138591565,0.00015364258,0.000009997639,0.00064482645,0.0032859282,0.00012564559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8203524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9078651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26162514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017639938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020955926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386039010","doi":"10.55400/iayfjmaimjf.v1i1.30","title":"CHILD PARTICIPATION IN FAMILY AND CHILD PROTECTION MATTERS IN QUÉBEC, CANADA","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Chronicle - The International Association of Youth and Family Judges and Magistrates´ Journal on Justice & Children´s Rights","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child protection; Political science; Economic Justice; Family law; Law","score_opus":0.014408791584103462,"score_gpt":0.25150659434135186,"score_spread":0.2370978027572484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386039010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9349557,0.0010989003,0.000002541497,0.06213634,0.00030484918,0.0003074433,0.000060013434,0.0000069923763,0.0011272125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966915,0.00087783777,0.0000038298,0.0020337002,0.0002051318,0.00001785322,0.000009304828,0.0000059074996,0.00015491813],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823606,0.0003218016,0.00036820085,0.0001742977,0.0006522107,0.00024741478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991697,0.00021213952,0.0004041531,0.000059222697,0.00008909038,0.00006567874],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011105373,0.00012979239,0.00016800886,0.000058197726,0.0016836511,0.00013390672,0.00021887613,0.00004177462,0.000020379603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014553899,0.00008313635,0.00003483464,0.00015052769,0.00014484105,0.00018385383,0.00007604267,0.00054270116,5.195175e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020564313,0.0017869205,0.6187328,0.000151222,0.0017514128,0.000061248196,0.27906904,0.01567648,0.0009478164,0.04384933,0.020128233,0.015789075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011241654,0.00009152663,0.9736766,0.000060489376,0.000081388855,0.000011486179,0.018770922,0.00030960536,0.000014713741,0.00050542626,0.005206488,0.00014715141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5947079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6607594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35494384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012652379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019848345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386166647","doi":"10.59962/9780774854207-005","title":"3 “There Seemed to Be No Recognized Law”: Canadian Law and the Prairie First Nations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.030460997012020718,"score_gpt":0.22434199148943126,"score_spread":0.19388099447741056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386166647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027673744,0.00023910156,0.0000014581335,0.0014772754,0.00018473144,0.0013207138,0.00079084164,0.00005733665,0.9956518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019938998,0.00045838984,0.00026645025,0.000803005,0.00012549513,0.000002842735,0.000018144347,0.000020848278,0.97836584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857205,0.00008780077,0.00018036421,0.00035084414,0.00044368036,0.00036525293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825823,0.00041820717,0.00016939982,0.00017192961,0.0006315394,0.00035071964],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041142042,0.00013787519,0.0003994606,0.000033073815,0.003721397,0.00025758368,0.00045496773,0.00036212485,0.0004073777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001558638,0.00022692134,0.0001514142,0.000020256435,0.002842777,0.000096724536,0.0002073659,0.0002799325,0.000014056315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093146075,0.000019291494,0.000037556212,0.00013598157,0.00063375005,0.00018572561,0.034155264,9.966885e-7,3.953952e-7,0.7612164,0.19817002,0.0053514387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088750466,0.000019846302,0.00013883832,0.00026127414,0.00013009815,0.0000018685047,0.0019260312,8.5514665e-7,1.5142662e-7,0.0007634949,0.9955959,0.0002741929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.997897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99997884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7974258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037333232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018739322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386326870","doi":"10.1093/he/9780191995729.003.0017","title":"Entick v Carrington [1765] 95 ER 807, King’s Bench","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Warrant; Law; Government (linguistics); History; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.049387351197851086,"score_gpt":0.2575753733690231,"score_spread":0.208188022171172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386326870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000477935,0.00012702655,0.000008017725,0.00022954136,0.0009309476,0.00063058204,0.00010565974,0.00047986934,0.9970104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030560864,0.0016829226,0.00008843924,0.00005110058,0.00044284575,0.0000021260562,0.000025224324,0.000054179804,0.9945971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759614,0.00008789219,0.0002255668,0.0006296297,0.0008261452,0.00063459855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986923,0.00016447132,0.0002741286,0.00034266838,0.00026889853,0.0002575824],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024897285,0.0004306789,0.00051504595,0.000099604884,0.0016605457,0.00013166075,0.000830806,0.00064245093,0.00016703973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059836646,0.00046038794,0.00038810464,0.000025711633,0.0007947759,0.00017042473,0.00074942096,0.0005973002,0.000027691562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002923516,0.000009178543,0.00006415944,0.00006700695,0.00035102875,0.00013419462,0.01325705,0.0000047045364,0.0000082231045,0.9715262,0.01143342,0.0031155725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028172397,0.00002599074,0.00011918628,0.00014200508,0.0002437019,4.1939109e-7,0.0019755515,0.0000047402973,0.000014140608,0.00087035773,0.99577993,0.0005422413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010337954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00559398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9843465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007408315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013234049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386429488","doi":"10.35589/swlj.2023.14.1.147","title":"The Development of Canada’s Duty to Accommodate and Its National Implications","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Social Welfare and Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Charter; Dignity; Human rights; Law; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Fundamental rights; Bill of rights; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology","score_opus":0.05470953112451685,"score_gpt":0.3480253252977206,"score_spread":0.29331579417320375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386429488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5113731,0.00018926909,4.193947e-7,0.46756557,0.000042245952,0.0002716436,0.000059652135,0.000023604776,0.020474501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99890846,0.000063585525,0.00003207064,0.00033759963,0.000055663884,0.00002215341,0.0000024060244,0.0000025867164,0.0005754913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924856,0.00003778695,0.00016364787,0.00008987838,0.00029451223,0.00016558236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996386,0.00013267124,0.00006519114,0.000012243635,0.00009481022,0.000056470053],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003971151,0.00005098452,0.000097614036,0.000010187925,0.0030270591,0.000014327583,0.00012154593,0.000057059362,0.000009056963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010795122,0.00003794688,0.000015110141,0.00016969403,0.00019468923,0.000059533315,0.00010310298,0.000064597174,0.0000010211287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032102525,0.0000035590667,0.00036232223,0.000009185579,0.00003471765,2.299879e-8,0.022778388,4.372053e-7,0.0001360595,0.9662806,0.0069176634,0.0034738767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047482354,0.0000017239445,0.367893,0.0000026774553,0.000003991831,2.702092e-8,0.006866215,5.8360405e-7,0.00014701151,0.0012787934,0.62371063,0.000047871075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030875104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33961034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96500176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007343813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014052712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99827087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386473838","doi":"10.1017/9781107337909.027","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02812879153745413,"score_gpt":0.2249116400060083,"score_spread":0.19678284846855418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386473838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003309002,0.00024160661,0.0000031826912,0.00039195968,0.00050177437,0.00035879653,0.00016838603,0.000038709008,0.9979647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004338302,0.0003719336,0.00001408816,0.000034822253,0.00027736544,4.259098e-7,0.000004896193,0.000014288651,0.99494386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985202,0.00007862834,0.00016310053,0.00024949713,0.0006325941,0.0003559628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985365,0.00024812628,0.00026594888,0.00027758564,0.00052284804,0.00014897532],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023270053,0.00021150814,0.00029425905,0.00001991525,0.0017720741,0.00003524928,0.0007423982,0.00021289231,0.00001942037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007448609,0.00017519135,0.00014101397,0.0000078556095,0.0016548375,0.000048225764,0.0002982217,0.00024164988,0.0000043221235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019923182,0.0000014471428,0.0000031636143,0.000012683915,0.00012835211,0.000016225616,0.00094229693,1.6935273e-7,0.0000027050944,0.63703996,0.3616818,0.00015128545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012882828,0.000014349982,0.000049075625,0.00005225049,0.000088913905,3.1433822e-7,0.0019365173,0.0000016650202,0.000043662374,0.000012763969,0.9974638,0.00020781707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64273435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4778549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6370272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008050017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007926062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386486512","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3896","title":"Assisted Suicide in Canada: Moral, Legal, and Policy Considerations by Travis Dumsday","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Criminal code; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Criminal law","score_opus":0.06244297441591759,"score_gpt":0.3299460171694009,"score_spread":0.26750304275348336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386486512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48161265,0.0022674901,0.000007488937,0.16916719,0.0008380143,0.0005533502,0.0001514587,0.00016106931,0.3452413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966475,0.0007541747,0.00012808832,0.0008276809,0.00025080107,0.000010133152,0.000005893702,0.000011648749,0.0013640915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981259,0.0002865032,0.00034428472,0.0001828268,0.0005024155,0.00055805995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991156,0.00027763587,0.0001226715,0.00007140857,0.00012492407,0.00028774928],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053095334,0.00014448534,0.00026077722,0.000060050574,0.002227943,0.00034148878,0.00013187436,0.000076122844,0.0001455522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005215782,0.00012461486,0.000051005292,0.00039192248,0.00029697365,0.00037961325,0.000048604736,0.0003643723,0.000013030581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001321904,0.000065495566,0.033322014,0.000014731114,0.00013330723,0.00047613782,0.010355873,0.0001204534,0.0008278191,0.7824071,0.16940057,0.0028632553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034434567,0.00012562211,0.61762327,0.00025810886,0.00012047796,0.00030675248,0.07050893,0.00026130307,0.00037082206,0.057194095,0.248257,0.0015301633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9987241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99983996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72521305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010692902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011500936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386489950","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3612","title":"Acknowledgements","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Executive summary; Law; Library science; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.04208922587348831,"score_gpt":0.3321611717326074,"score_spread":0.2900719458591191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386489950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043815915,0.0015766282,0.00006040594,0.004658007,0.0017856979,0.00006490998,0.0000023755667,0.000045898032,0.9874245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97348887,0.0008606559,0.0017198778,0.0005115539,0.0018595237,0.0000040953846,0.0000018742498,0.000010655533,0.02154291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998467,0.0002653527,0.00020404406,0.00015281948,0.000504267,0.00040651552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872965,0.00006652401,0.0000936035,0.000091359056,0.000796839,0.00022205467],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048808058,0.00010273626,0.00015969663,0.000011934291,0.0027193709,0.00030844475,0.00023188103,0.00007735844,0.008391246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056557,0.00008527371,0.00013163056,0.00015075966,0.00022254854,0.00032078172,0.00009806309,0.00028817172,0.0015476827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015215018,0.00030505957,0.006088515,0.00001916229,0.00035225155,0.00035263548,0.02618698,0.000014197822,0.000735086,0.8315204,0.11555851,0.018852029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050881715,0.000019175037,0.0026992518,0.00004947493,0.000041148975,0.000021447513,0.011272519,0.0000035295411,0.0005223272,0.028402228,0.95623696,0.0002231258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004645055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2469458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9691073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023954478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009824393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386528062","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3715","title":"A History of Law in Canada, Volume One: Beginnings to 1866 by Philip Girard, Jim Phillips &amp; R. Blake Brown","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.036959184390837604,"score_gpt":0.26028663116237843,"score_spread":0.22332744677154082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386528062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08482034,0.009230938,0.000038551818,0.038243413,0.0019084899,0.00037813638,0.00009767988,0.000049473176,0.865233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97732913,0.000324846,0.00079891307,0.002122959,0.0003977521,0.000011677196,0.000008677196,0.000023025435,0.018982992],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968523,0.00036977418,0.00057589146,0.00034717287,0.0011434173,0.00071143976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984534,0.00012805022,0.00028644016,0.00020644044,0.0004656084,0.00046008083],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007429666,0.00022443938,0.0005179094,0.000035798686,0.00075962633,0.00008039826,0.00047167225,0.00012702432,0.0019528172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036999353,0.00022358831,0.00015724276,0.00024679734,0.000527237,0.00034546814,0.00013692414,0.0006133766,0.00006067585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108712484,0.0005379943,0.021535492,0.000106964624,0.00043948708,0.0003395715,0.07700735,0.00020076087,0.008770242,0.25389066,0.63401765,0.0030451484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047022756,0.000022181337,0.0034806682,0.00012081656,0.00003576143,0.000016475535,0.0027944401,0.000002896771,0.00013360972,0.0015212854,0.9910825,0.00031916346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9940664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8925088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052361004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016471753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386763831","doi":"10.32920/24150465","title":"Is the right to early intervention being honoured? A study of family experiences with early childhood services","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); Legislation; Political science; Dignity; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Early childhood; Medicine; Convention; Economic growth; Public administration; Nursing; Psychology; Human rights; Law; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.03269336570297874,"score_gpt":0.3255775189158946,"score_spread":0.29288415321291583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386763831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906255,0.00013641772,0.00002697994,0.0023313316,0.0006090359,0.0024071776,0.000011476813,0.00021894711,0.0036331082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961585,0.000034263292,0.00017673444,0.00014287715,0.00025454827,0.00074155256,0.0000026847467,0.000024081208,0.0024647573],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966953,0.00041152397,0.00052046654,0.00069391774,0.0012368242,0.00044198448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985536,0.0001674737,0.00038699602,0.00041028488,0.00035978897,0.00012190801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007953952,0.00034607798,0.00052392116,0.00009403721,0.0012031797,0.00047785247,0.0012993992,0.00017968434,0.000113393544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005881207,0.00018820608,0.00022659531,0.000563788,0.00028535567,0.00025803866,0.0011793452,0.00041853273,0.00005751009],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016815711,0.0002394678,0.031673394,0.000037789996,0.000350987,0.0000031504985,0.96680677,0.000017133914,0.000004536422,0.00012857078,0.00016593507,0.00055546645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018455523,0.00030282643,0.4064718,0.00025088736,0.0000674323,5.1750806e-8,0.59210354,0.0000024911014,0.000035843215,0.0001752001,0.00020730295,0.00019809415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32361013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10602953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37479842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012400052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054014134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92540073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386763901","doi":"10.32920/24150465.v1","title":"Is the right to early intervention being honoured? A study of family experiences with early childhood services","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); Legislation; Political science; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Dignity; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Early childhood; Early childhood education; Medicine; Convention; Economic growth; Public administration; Psychology; Nursing; Human rights; Law; Pedagogy; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.03269336570297874,"score_gpt":0.3255775189158946,"score_spread":0.29288415321291583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386763901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906255,0.00013641772,0.00002697994,0.0023313316,0.0006090359,0.0024071776,0.000011476813,0.00021894711,0.0036331082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961585,0.000034263292,0.00017673444,0.00014287715,0.00025454827,0.00074155256,0.0000026847467,0.000024081208,0.0024647573],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966953,0.00041152397,0.00052046654,0.00069391774,0.0012368242,0.00044198448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985536,0.0001674737,0.00038699602,0.00041028488,0.00035978897,0.00012190801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007953952,0.00034607798,0.00052392116,0.00009403721,0.0012031797,0.00047785247,0.0012993992,0.00017968434,0.000113393544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005881207,0.00018820608,0.00022659531,0.000563788,0.00028535567,0.00025803866,0.0011793452,0.00041853273,0.00005751009],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016815711,0.0002394678,0.031673394,0.000037789996,0.000350987,0.0000031504985,0.96680677,0.000017133914,0.000004536422,0.00012857078,0.00016593507,0.00055546645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018455523,0.00030282643,0.4064718,0.00025088736,0.0000674323,5.1750806e-8,0.59210354,0.0000024911014,0.000035843215,0.0001752001,0.00020730295,0.00019809415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32361013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10602953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37479842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012400052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054014134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92540073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386766368","doi":"10.26443/arc.v45i.345","title":"Charles Taylor and Rowan Williams in Conversation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arc The Journal of the School of Religious Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rowan; Conversation; Psychoanalysis; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Communication; Biology","score_opus":0.0351016766676307,"score_gpt":0.3295473605310182,"score_spread":0.2944456838633875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386766368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93317986,0.019112054,0.0000018215534,0.046255834,0.0005322256,0.00020499963,0.0000015598366,0.0000043937002,0.00070726016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9532664,0.04612309,0.00006510222,0.00011285537,0.00020078635,0.000002049854,2.1733966e-8,0.0000044359344,0.0002252931],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866796,0.00027928254,0.0003460767,0.000072192255,0.000444855,0.00018964987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813795,0.00034700465,0.00090957555,0.00019795957,0.0003569248,0.000050603743],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017079755,0.00010441516,0.0003119233,0.0000300183,0.0015208824,0.000059289563,0.0006595408,0.000042394808,0.0000030750934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004140701,0.00004858213,0.00010898561,0.000068169466,0.0013804096,0.00026744025,0.00028796654,0.00024949753,0.0000036668996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024017048,0.0000623921,0.58734554,0.000073522635,0.00096871046,0.0000088111365,0.3804015,0.00007453236,0.0019127033,0.0010449413,0.022169266,0.0056979116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015341237,0.00017940665,0.72104865,0.00048192582,0.00029890268,0.000013133903,0.24966127,0.00000850954,0.001040127,0.018025927,0.007470904,0.00023710422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034733822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037529103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13370313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013990742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041253552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387484525","doi":"10.1515/9780887554377-008","title":"First Nations Response to Membership Codes of the Indian Act: Bill C-31 and Cowessess First Nation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Manitoba Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arithmetic; Political science; History; Genealogy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06492221862378553,"score_gpt":0.24009610825607128,"score_spread":0.17517388963228575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387484525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05005589,0.00014958072,0.000004449711,0.004023624,0.00029630424,0.0017639981,0.00025215276,0.00006257121,0.94339144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.582589,0.0004421189,0.00020003915,0.000037890415,0.000089667155,0.0000027633369,0.0000057073885,0.00001822988,0.4166146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987857,0.00011380983,0.00016756356,0.00024845457,0.00050308905,0.00018140113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980024,0.000866189,0.00034304496,0.00021372737,0.00046863838,0.00010601458],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030814367,0.00018829889,0.00029191325,0.00012663737,0.0016509397,0.000042122392,0.0005517392,0.00028293516,0.00007676576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034191826,0.00015215499,0.000115961586,0.000028752776,0.001038555,0.00012459791,0.00037236066,0.00018845049,0.000009205567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005774415,0.000077207136,0.0009581125,0.0007382328,0.00088900106,0.000022374177,0.41026288,0.00006700978,0.0000631993,0.5686703,0.01562086,0.002053438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003253928,0.00004407145,0.004232338,0.0005014768,0.00016603262,5.6694546e-7,0.02041631,0.0000025887707,0.000076573895,0.00084187905,0.97310686,0.0002859163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08621732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49963656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.957486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030603196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010820465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387520397","doi":"10.1017/9781108680929.004","title":"The Promise and Perils of Dialogue","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Legislature; Metaphor; Democracy; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Politics; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0433314759977825,"score_gpt":0.2444252409239487,"score_spread":0.2010937649261662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387520397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006627028,0.00041729884,0.0000014730713,0.00022970294,0.00024463335,0.000547646,0.00012745096,0.00009188344,0.9976772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003200952,0.003201301,0.000011149094,0.000009621308,0.00014206757,0.0000012733486,0.0000055710602,0.000016812488,0.99341124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998976,0.0000783724,0.00013244626,0.0002518515,0.00031666146,0.000244664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990058,0.0003256575,0.00018744235,0.00018205604,0.00019020536,0.000108831235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000244974,0.00018073419,0.000280817,0.00003149364,0.0012856842,0.00005136465,0.0003711633,0.00022946559,0.0000014556398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000099878394,0.0001456959,0.00013119362,0.00000917531,0.0017615125,0.000053946307,0.00037401562,0.00022518753,0.0000064632163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027759896,0.0000019294862,0.0000068765166,0.00003454802,0.00011900845,0.000021048212,0.0030792826,1.0856946e-7,0.000010093594,0.98199296,0.013074139,0.0016322184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017934648,0.000017555652,0.00017915678,0.00006936991,0.000102453996,3.010325e-7,0.0019002276,0.0000013433722,0.000018436609,0.000037019858,0.99731463,0.0001801767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033041772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004417895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9842405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014241703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008576398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98885727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387565652","doi":"10.1515/9780887559310-008","title":"Racism, Canadian Jurisprudence, and the De-Peopling of the Métis in <i>Daniels</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Manitoba Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Political science; Law; Gender studies","score_opus":0.02474684503895217,"score_gpt":0.219905095313742,"score_spread":0.19515825027478984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387565652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008468961,0.0013240852,0.000004450428,0.00082979474,0.00014898939,0.00051026023,0.000037043963,0.0000106802945,0.98866576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54905146,0.0031168326,0.00017583999,0.0001629883,0.00013103668,0.0000010900044,0.0000025804952,0.000019459352,0.4473387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989546,0.00015309299,0.0001433598,0.00018834182,0.00031590738,0.00024469206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911386,0.00025618513,0.00020898823,0.00018545339,0.00015376938,0.00008173664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004086784,0.0001397788,0.00032101866,0.000041696556,0.00072552834,0.000025747071,0.0005626779,0.0002211101,0.000024767387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006960135,0.000107021915,0.00014085388,0.000016684879,0.0015830031,0.000044685115,0.0003254329,0.0003191581,7.2645935e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048308364,0.000007884882,0.0008618407,0.000104694656,0.00020072274,0.000051757448,0.097718686,0.000017312756,0.000010094613,0.8954778,0.0009226642,0.0045782886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010376138,0.00001260762,0.0041292165,0.0006179211,0.00028443625,0.0000023400898,0.04594012,0.000019754181,0.00005917335,0.0031662663,0.9443765,0.00035404056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8253673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97552407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94345385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002781084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028314826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5832641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387573389","doi":"10.1017/s0738248023000469","title":"Luke Taylor, <i>Constructing the Family: Marriage and Work in Nineteenth-Century English Law</i> Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2023. Pp. viii, 411. $90 hardcover (ISBN 978-1-4875-4652-6).","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Sociology; Media studies; Economic history; Law and economics; History; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.024759491190100878,"score_gpt":0.24407559132079287,"score_spread":0.219316100130692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387573389","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002531698,0.8296282,1.9884097e-7,0.0003004023,0.0007135785,0.0005480092,0.000021604525,0.00006144682,0.16619481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024339516,0.9719294,0.00009306589,0.00081143656,0.00022850621,0.000012566932,0.000007511603,0.000012784477,0.0025652484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837244,0.0003768956,0.00027962157,0.00033295286,0.00031604487,0.00032204587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918115,0.00021371433,0.00019139684,0.00020081017,0.000103013954,0.00010989399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082933385,0.00018710484,0.00050782086,0.0000026528323,0.0006357201,0.000029889914,0.00026265846,0.00010887751,0.00038213126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012757309,0.00015050541,0.000113443566,0.00007847772,0.0010061502,0.00048351192,0.00021616845,0.0001661478,0.0000069509883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009069745,0.00009455902,0.0040218025,0.0028497237,0.00024201903,0.000040230938,0.08946729,0.0000012595428,0.00009062774,0.22561254,0.64634085,0.031148413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025805863,0.000012670983,0.0016974483,0.00065172295,0.000084856,2.7470784e-7,0.006897521,6.977133e-7,4.3149979e-7,0.000019538187,0.99019444,0.0001823407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24550281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20546135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3438536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007510264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044427645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8090369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387592524","doi":"10.29305/tj.2023.10.198.46","title":"Unconformity Decision in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Unconformity; Law; Suspension (topology); Political science; Geology; Mathematics; Geochemistry","score_opus":0.04038087896632172,"score_gpt":0.32677653113061617,"score_spread":0.28639565216429447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387592524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95643497,0.00007744427,0.0000037156437,0.0068954234,0.0006956333,0.00015186245,0.0000035599128,0.00003637096,0.035701048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997235,0.00020208466,0.000023843033,0.00035102095,0.00013086614,0.0000073855563,7.314699e-7,0.0000025477939,0.002046507],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914706,0.000079187244,0.00009952326,0.00007765569,0.0003381791,0.00025837743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986277,0.001179729,0.000026959584,0.0000817526,0.000040191055,0.000043673925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000563381,0.00004848941,0.00007374155,0.000011148459,0.0006417259,0.00002062216,0.00023870908,0.000022532402,0.00009341637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014592297,0.000029314338,0.000015723406,0.0004722923,0.0000843447,0.0000705974,0.00007731412,0.00009910681,0.00019569408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001092578,0.000042787426,0.061991826,0.00012025881,0.00007004441,0.00010153907,0.3017458,0.005074173,0.00008628767,0.051962078,0.41889024,0.15980572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002707585,0.0000068778504,0.4668956,0.000032583986,0.00006082777,3.4201923e-7,0.2680501,0.00060717796,0.00001735509,0.0015016475,0.26236522,0.0001914936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9922402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99901223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4049038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005851576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036301013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49357015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387626980","doi":"10.1515/9780887555459-006","title":"Love Letter to Section 25 of the Canadian Constitution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Manitoba Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Constitution; Law; Political science; Philosophy; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.042694395898026524,"score_gpt":0.2247145690741206,"score_spread":0.1820201731760941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387626980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015425208,0.000020107229,0.000009377262,0.0006322184,0.00064058584,0.0004842736,0.000073045805,0.000014493252,0.9965834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16357386,0.000020754082,0.0000814549,0.00020783383,0.00062951946,1.6001174e-7,0.000002999309,0.000007555142,0.83547586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915576,0.00005557114,0.00010175811,0.00017537765,0.000340336,0.00017119362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991768,0.00003288728,0.0001826412,0.00016244451,0.00034267202,0.000102540784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013499425,0.00012439303,0.0001896261,0.000057713016,0.0006967876,0.000016598315,0.00037861205,0.0002929892,0.00016258107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029636207,0.000114213166,0.00012807717,0.000009523983,0.0014847137,0.000048465932,0.00014473377,0.00018519207,0.000042130898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006511616,0.000014322183,0.00027423413,0.00011368579,0.00046908951,0.000018431318,0.10720626,0.000014917048,0.00011930207,0.6693977,0.22028495,0.0020219642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009477433,0.000017783688,0.00035445072,0.00011328793,0.00008395606,2.1231732e-7,0.002185056,4.091794e-7,0.00007551293,0.00029049956,0.99665654,0.00012752427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86428326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9878102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7763716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066385965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021428448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.547049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387950447","doi":"10.1080/15265161.2023.2256266","title":"Care to Ease the Slope? Differences in Canadian and Californian Medical Assistance in Dying Laws","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"The American Journal of Bioethics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.07306580805529164,"score_gpt":0.3607721116409649,"score_spread":0.2877063035856733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387950447","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1664689,0.0007191569,0.000001281587,0.8319381,0.00032049135,0.00018819576,0.00003409972,0.000007140447,0.0003226272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76958615,0.0018941624,0.000055366345,0.22676192,0.001494597,0.000012210147,0.000002050905,0.000019883122,0.00017363932],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958457,0.0014981674,0.00048117057,0.00019740668,0.0013011667,0.0006764402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968984,0.0019364917,0.00045634568,0.00015254857,0.00022062502,0.00033557392],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031391548,0.00020840224,0.0005896532,0.00017133511,0.0007370689,0.0001775501,0.001086952,0.00028342273,0.00001969128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029162688,0.00010776879,0.00009173585,0.0008883417,0.0036906123,0.000056414643,0.00012043215,0.0039282003,0.000009955345],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007060132,0.000015469046,0.14567976,0.00009842803,0.00018558514,0.0020143848,0.68621683,0.000014654529,0.0000018699566,0.00033607232,0.13649961,0.028866744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002093809,0.00014960482,0.08566006,0.0009523849,0.00005636227,0.000014123768,0.29115167,0.000012929508,5.9693417e-7,0.00024956898,0.62113386,0.000409445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86290383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97651803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60517615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008283751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014698319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99902076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387975054","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3928","title":"No Legal Way Out: R v Ryan, Domestic Abuse, and the Defence of Duress by Nadia Verrelli and Lori Chambers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Irrational number; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Focus (optics); Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.01873483587982785,"score_gpt":0.28664018577461414,"score_spread":0.2679053498947863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387975054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5731428,0.009854433,0.000033143595,0.013605488,0.002426982,0.00075607264,0.000057413523,0.00013739357,0.39998627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908532,0.006030147,0.00010724894,0.0001414264,0.00024459802,0.00000800256,0.0000013714653,0.000011448107,0.0026025623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982974,0.00026129204,0.00028041823,0.00019069259,0.0005356273,0.00043455657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880296,0.00051632576,0.00019425908,0.00009523488,0.00016942936,0.00022180978],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011292866,0.00015656318,0.00029813807,0.00002176757,0.002257192,0.00030141027,0.00025699148,0.00009613027,0.00004383659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003161811,0.00009731794,0.0000832503,0.00018591055,0.0021373213,0.0003199409,0.00007851285,0.00035955542,0.000042050688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028840816,0.00008702196,0.009173856,0.00011871834,0.00046587412,0.0001661661,0.15922558,0.00011238425,0.00059240864,0.80472875,0.022725917,0.002314942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014701102,0.0005523801,0.04722703,0.00096220337,0.0007508151,0.00041861724,0.07552557,0.0009906712,0.00033619243,0.06597489,0.7902384,0.0023221679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07335785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10502855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76751244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071033275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040408762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388010206","doi":"10.1080/1756073x.2023.2270808","title":"Practicing truth, in silence: reflecting on the use of non-disclosure agreements in North American ecclesial contexts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Practical Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster Divinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Commission; Order (exchange); Law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Business; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.20404988002323263,"score_gpt":0.4615829254929442,"score_spread":0.25753304546971156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388010206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9770744,0.0000076126225,0.000011428325,0.017491344,0.00021940755,0.00041569743,0.0000029481976,0.0000323455,0.0047448296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988008,0.00015452839,0.00033133436,0.00039284755,0.00011153567,0.00004640462,0.0000017278641,0.000009393795,0.00015141671],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99677956,0.0015874677,0.0003870456,0.000298665,0.0003992987,0.00054795406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98666096,0.012703656,0.00033000653,0.00015712182,0.00008686681,0.00006136895],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015341282,0.00013701625,0.00034454724,0.00009705467,0.0003411568,0.000036148922,0.00020481112,0.00008429212,0.00006538557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026821552,0.00009175841,0.000058950514,0.0013147119,0.0009958594,0.00033416564,0.0001459085,0.00060273067,0.00007817115],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006635895,0.0004387235,0.79959214,0.000021068547,0.00012320287,0.00018239522,0.11422094,0.00043005828,0.0004736472,0.06480588,0.00085002935,0.018198306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060896104,0.00028799352,0.9339475,0.00005278555,0.000027689048,0.000002312744,0.05964518,0.0006436919,0.00012756525,0.0017092917,0.0027026222,0.00024442945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011201236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029237708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13435532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016679546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000087015615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99538326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388120833","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198258223.003.0007","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: A Feminist Perspective","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Law; Fundamental rights; Ex post facto law; Bill of rights; Human rights; Right to property; Art","score_opus":0.020722096438458525,"score_gpt":0.27295370836234395,"score_spread":0.25223161192388543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388120833","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010427591,0.0015499585,5.5809434e-8,0.0053843632,0.00013162977,0.0003525062,0.00004695906,0.000021072798,0.99240917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15694398,0.0007201666,0.000023728306,0.00016698826,0.0003493136,0.000009351384,0.0000018919194,0.000011173788,0.8417734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989356,0.000029516272,0.00017059446,0.00023177221,0.0003419227,0.00029060748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992253,0.0001647479,0.000093151466,0.0001261328,0.00019629613,0.00019438184],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018585843,0.00018453957,0.00025308284,0.000033819444,0.0025228043,0.00010772192,0.00022023216,0.000255281,0.0013818863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036949303,0.00010537454,0.00009992083,0.000022334218,0.0024897081,0.000044970937,0.000029391973,0.00021599508,0.00007771533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003622618,0.0000018017462,0.000014405293,0.0000015867338,0.000092491406,0.0000032976398,0.041522745,1.3662884e-8,1.3885838e-7,0.9487295,0.00912616,0.00050424284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067828776,0.000018766706,0.00016612708,0.000027084305,0.000033041182,5.3047404e-7,0.007438851,3.3545965e-7,7.7555995e-7,0.09148433,0.9006014,0.00016096646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9359374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99404943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8914752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056589243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022274828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388137342","doi":"10.1515/9781552389911-018","title":"Puisne Justices of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.03051044012139186,"score_gpt":0.22328342614842195,"score_spread":0.19277298602703008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388137342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018852319,0.00026094314,0.000005920781,0.000105988096,0.00027446993,0.00032977122,0.0000858657,0.000011428452,0.9970404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03365666,0.00017005485,0.00013575534,0.00001930165,0.00008171663,1.3360595e-7,0.0000024659746,0.000009833623,0.9659241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863404,0.00007203516,0.00019488978,0.00017789667,0.00073095056,0.00019017987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985149,0.00014312424,0.00053259195,0.0002365733,0.00049621804,0.000076575954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016531358,0.00015681563,0.000404838,0.000021511481,0.0004195304,0.0000045353167,0.0007400441,0.00020834613,0.00039336985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005470954,0.000131483,0.00017282338,0.000008815184,0.002128059,0.000041395037,0.00034198214,0.00016841837,6.888595e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019168868,0.000035112917,0.00021070069,0.0007160088,0.0011051802,0.000021498498,0.07008557,0.000008900363,0.00018097738,0.8825589,0.042526435,0.0023590685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002261269,0.000031412706,0.00055848394,0.00026394267,0.0003452113,1.7753348e-7,0.0027222869,0.000007662482,0.00035379047,0.00045465276,0.9948486,0.00018765712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86853075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90010524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9523222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018823132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005680821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78409225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388149978","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199284740.003.0013","title":"Canada: The Rights and Their Application","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Explication; Legislation; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.016082226778484688,"score_gpt":0.2367226035432724,"score_spread":0.2206403767647877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388149978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000064219574,0.000889153,0.000019263434,0.0075075533,0.00008825489,0.0003893112,0.000025786976,0.00003268184,0.9909838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06703051,0.000111575464,0.000014249262,0.00033908695,0.000443996,0.000017364748,0.000009892725,0.0000069554326,0.9320264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930674,0.000017846089,0.00011392608,0.00017485925,0.0002380548,0.00014859092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995537,0.0001383852,0.00008192818,0.00010408812,0.00007883452,0.00004309622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000115460774,0.00014484537,0.00014842328,0.0000063243415,0.0011861783,0.000042285406,0.00016172513,0.00012672733,0.00012927465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000829177,0.000067496134,0.000037082536,0.000013579215,0.0003745395,0.000031116513,0.000046362657,0.0001346859,0.000014217357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.9493203e-7,0.0000013845057,0.000012232428,0.0000029653334,0.00003203943,4.3183888e-7,0.0015567325,4.0456638e-7,9.658607e-7,0.7106815,0.2846775,0.0030332706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023278346,0.0000017034572,0.00028592095,0.0000052857436,0.000011450521,1.4039856e-7,0.00029442323,0.0000025416364,0.0000025400448,0.01932622,0.97993124,0.00011528072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99109995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69525373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028129027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015282932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9123245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388628832","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4599638","title":"First Nations People, Law and Injustice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.014800751628111179,"score_gpt":0.29877414866356405,"score_spread":0.2839733970354529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388628832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7611924,0.006949157,0.00036331709,0.087636404,0.0012330171,0.00062225666,0.00001062865,0.00054524734,0.14144759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713123,0.023602422,0.00003300325,0.00011588946,0.00042839962,0.000008636721,0.0000012069537,0.000007745818,0.0044903937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788797,0.00009235359,0.00013364443,0.000120638484,0.000321261,0.0014441111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993495,0.0003356316,0.000065736356,0.000045094865,0.00011179175,0.000092244765],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013336464,0.00008270429,0.00011032496,0.000057814297,0.0042193816,0.0001225775,0.00016096543,0.00005872533,0.00003159199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006957736,0.00006857911,0.000049507715,0.0005634671,0.00018755467,0.00026022806,0.000053430693,0.00065287336,0.00010241197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034968962,0.000010189205,0.0016543099,0.000005323073,0.000056014338,0.0000011780455,0.015354574,0.000017362072,0.0000068583927,0.98176974,0.00045192157,0.00066905806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009328992,0.00018877891,0.031826094,0.000057573023,0.0001514174,0.000055490367,0.3144048,0.00012128143,0.0000069131183,0.30887967,0.342838,0.0005371065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077596055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60558987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068236433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042111657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389131209","doi":"10.1525/ncl.2023.78.3.254","title":"Contributors to this Issue","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nineteenth-Century Literature","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Romanticism; Citation; Download; Romance; Art; History; Art history; Literature; Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.01453809609386218,"score_gpt":0.3065024887800517,"score_spread":0.2919643926861895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389131209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47636977,0.035075963,0.000017436416,0.16520269,0.021614833,0.0057891025,0.0014482975,0.00589615,0.28858575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86261165,0.0057694833,0.0005815135,0.0048940764,0.0058023157,0.000204006,0.0005137141,0.000066477885,0.11955678],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974032,0.00022676567,0.00027080276,0.00046343438,0.00075156445,0.0008842422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987778,0.00019604857,0.000078402554,0.00024589372,0.00031096858,0.00039085036],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048626764,0.00027026312,0.00032050937,0.0001258888,0.0010759913,0.00042039194,0.00044613163,0.0002907522,0.0014015755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084972056,0.0002144793,0.00014892411,0.0019064054,0.00014989756,0.00032263226,0.00018250821,0.000378219,0.003134861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030466055,0.000038766455,0.0021264812,0.000026006875,0.00006570278,0.00005140753,0.09220224,0.000010297578,0.00043558094,0.008508611,0.89106,0.00544445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029691376,0.000039143422,0.005151868,0.00008783095,0.000017720198,5.8432715e-7,0.004384217,0.0000065944696,0.00006664695,0.00005183084,0.9896065,0.0002901577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000628539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023844112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38624185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023346132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004365416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389332904","doi":"10.7202/1105996ar","title":"THE CODIFICATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN CANADA","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Fundamental rights; Law; Political science; Ex post facto law; International human rights law; Charter; Supreme court; Constitution; Bill of rights; Democracy; Linguistic rights; Right to property; Politics","score_opus":0.01577924187619739,"score_gpt":0.23069462955659945,"score_spread":0.21491538768040205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389332904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89442486,0.0060565853,0.0000060864295,0.0028254779,0.00041195197,0.00021749,0.000012547427,0.000010190259,0.09603483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9519555,0.0005202178,0.000050307888,0.000027080103,0.00020735142,0.0000026638818,0.0000032381865,0.0000056822923,0.047227975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985879,0.00021844507,0.00021318966,0.00013611217,0.00022493783,0.0006194082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919623,0.00023346514,0.00016212578,0.00015584558,0.00007487098,0.0001774897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044186562,0.00011827121,0.00019634952,0.000022203152,0.0012074619,0.0000125266815,0.00034502268,0.000118636344,0.00013450945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039401668,0.00011349512,0.00007707528,0.0002955859,0.00035669343,0.0001778161,0.00007899717,0.00018921371,0.000017829361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016917827,0.00006430524,0.1198328,0.00010483384,0.00007418364,0.000017591794,0.02656408,0.00009123395,0.0007330138,0.8476061,0.0029861254,0.0019087676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003202247,0.000018869006,0.27201787,0.00015686196,0.000075760974,0.000004157557,0.009317522,0.00010036604,0.0009230456,0.0015043442,0.71534497,0.00021602893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98387307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9968772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8461018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015292504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022962918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9884876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389355438","doi":"10.7202/1105800ar","title":"SUBSIDIARITY, REPUBLICANISM, AND THE DIVISION OF POWERS IN CANADA","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Jurisprudence; Federalism; Normative; Political science; Law; Federalist; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Economic Justice; Sociology; European union; Economics","score_opus":0.015143951439335984,"score_gpt":0.21758965818865847,"score_spread":0.2024457067493225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389355438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8973368,0.010160933,0.000019236557,0.022058737,0.00034786144,0.00030225824,0.000019427818,0.000012746738,0.06974204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792195,0.0024265093,0.00011140226,0.00017833106,0.00006615743,0.0000017119041,0.0000020628127,0.0000090159465,0.017985316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836224,0.00036833866,0.00022188174,0.00023616283,0.0003386886,0.00047269397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891263,0.00034598054,0.00015236069,0.00016700808,0.00013421864,0.00028779253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009706998,0.00014302108,0.00034559678,0.000035869394,0.00029751987,0.000026382744,0.00035749684,0.00014091146,0.00007504439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003583546,0.00013383206,0.00007993648,0.00042362185,0.0008388202,0.00018310978,0.00030655522,0.00025791934,0.0000036611134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002381912,0.00008019941,0.3283618,0.00022845954,0.00017611022,0.00026752707,0.121021435,0.00061260036,0.00007246764,0.53126806,0.008709478,0.0089636585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007080382,0.0001392126,0.34086987,0.0007758218,0.00028401872,0.00004666104,0.15040399,0.0030214002,0.0003364004,0.0111898,0.48503917,0.00081326487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9852232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9916916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52007824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010484985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009801553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389355453","doi":"10.7202/1105717ar","title":"LA CÉLÉBRATION DU MARIAGE DOIT RESPECTER LES PRESCRIPTIONS DU CODE CIVIL DU QUÉBEC, QU’ELLE REVÊTE OU NON UN CARACTÈRE RELIGIEUX","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.01124196857489311,"score_gpt":0.21203017792118087,"score_spread":0.20078820934628777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389355453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70352846,0.007140633,0.0020736796,0.09856309,0.0009527478,0.0008438076,0.00017209272,0.00030378133,0.1864217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80251527,0.023546219,0.00047289822,0.00024504738,0.0013254033,0.000020467736,0.000015190089,0.000056629942,0.17180285],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968669,0.0006814698,0.00044486378,0.0007018859,0.00042815492,0.00087674195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978041,0.00071334303,0.00033750795,0.00042775474,0.00032788547,0.00038937564],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007750083,0.00042765227,0.00050014997,0.000101981845,0.0022015772,0.00014501685,0.00067066116,0.0006437072,0.0020603135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057556754,0.00041515863,0.00040403,0.00043044947,0.0009002003,0.0007933878,0.00041139207,0.00043634183,0.00044353295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075417524,0.0008426616,0.24417391,0.00089061965,0.001275983,0.0020677361,0.19779514,0.0003751676,0.026745928,0.2364765,0.24521534,0.043386843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013299844,0.00010755353,0.057542946,0.00073304545,0.0004072374,0.00007828596,0.005793947,0.0003150326,0.00082655274,0.00081115204,0.9314017,0.0006525501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10022116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4020861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6861864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008969971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036876177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389676879","doi":"10.1515/9780889778276-017","title":"10. Canada’s Court System: A Hostile Place for Indigenous Peoples","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Regina Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Law; Genealogy; History; Biology","score_opus":0.025845479849715188,"score_gpt":0.22076609341334277,"score_spread":0.19492061356362758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389676879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033398,0.0014458209,0.00002754714,0.0010139634,0.0002302896,0.0010489554,0.00048090666,0.00008514439,0.9953334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0036040498,0.00030800316,0.00020598799,0.000009808429,0.00013750976,0.0000015564377,0.000034501918,0.000020403251,0.9956782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857605,0.000058170517,0.000105260675,0.00035846586,0.00055216305,0.0003499048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835587,0.00033025575,0.00037051595,0.00022687463,0.00056650676,0.00014998208],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014807649,0.0002505097,0.0005519627,0.00003743635,0.001222889,0.00003246209,0.00050562556,0.00032077878,0.00011175533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006555095,0.00028393854,0.00020398243,0.000007517467,0.00050285744,0.000049373863,0.00018407854,0.00017316385,0.0000051559036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024296952,0.00001996914,0.00001726686,0.0020884632,0.0011060005,0.0003328587,0.0907512,0.00001826389,0.0000056630356,0.49447316,0.40910026,0.0018439206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002951445,0.00003652132,0.000009420571,0.0004302771,0.00024150798,0.0000014973295,0.021996362,0.000003176841,0.000009133562,0.000011600237,0.97666734,0.00029801409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83496255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56756705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012325884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022854726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390580097","doi":"10.61959/t210318b","title":"Rapport : Les droits des conjoints de fait au Canada","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.14991334389447541,"score_gpt":0.344883094046323,"score_spread":0.1949697501518476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390580097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2156512,0.00229707,0.000023558869,0.0052234326,0.0050844564,0.00072254584,0.00013304056,0.00029916468,0.7705655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31134465,0.0052646906,0.00024646483,0.00017522408,0.0019829767,0.00008458613,0.00005024329,0.00006058974,0.6807906],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942144,0.00036367332,0.00088224804,0.0007890859,0.0019641407,0.0017864406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970772,0.00061508734,0.00051321415,0.0002645324,0.0008615496,0.0006683748],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016718586,0.0006709843,0.0010637922,0.000053630345,0.0033318002,0.00012505427,0.0006528012,0.0006970713,0.0028957038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002201266,0.0005639017,0.00038598035,0.0007387477,0.0022869674,0.00019777473,0.0003616671,0.0006643113,0.0003274442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076613,0.00008357431,0.2706919,0.00087109645,0.001396116,0.000737802,0.03494656,0.000036243066,0.000025786381,0.009790723,0.6182464,0.063166164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013134556,0.000025595766,0.17279054,0.00028345804,0.0001948296,0.000016356476,0.03708139,0.000012100085,0.000032640044,0.0003269786,0.7883771,0.00072765665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99953264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17013073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011526052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019484848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390592588","doi":"10.61959/t210318a","title":"Report: The Rights of Common-Law Partners in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Safeguarding; Jurisdiction; Common law; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Law; Statutory law; Political science; Family law; Medicine","score_opus":0.12274719316513748,"score_gpt":0.4050144762153211,"score_spread":0.2822672830501836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390592588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01657169,0.00047836817,1.2931693e-7,0.005177703,0.0024935666,0.0006044937,0.000038537662,0.000056660185,0.97457886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8667445,0.0008666686,0.000012277037,0.00009707136,0.00039869593,0.00006145821,0.00003316298,0.000016081205,0.13177007],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964251,0.00021870773,0.00072035723,0.00028429803,0.0019241555,0.00042739048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810207,0.0006372457,0.0005043325,0.00030019987,0.00037110026,0.000085033666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001616692,0.0001951628,0.00058379397,0.000023402414,0.00065576687,0.000030668405,0.00044787055,0.0001812263,0.00018539009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005140999,0.000106821695,0.00012825397,0.00038434632,0.000588427,0.000052652475,0.00014715634,0.00031698213,0.000009171049],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023711877,0.000025171268,0.020742534,0.00007584329,0.00022175156,0.0007765838,0.008014805,0.000020414625,5.036487e-7,0.017307438,0.9523945,0.00041808368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004742053,0.0000034504817,0.010982564,0.000073073046,0.000029885456,0.0000034544337,0.008394764,0.0000013114868,0.0000083336245,0.000735114,0.9795379,0.00018274234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8501728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029342237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054773786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9716635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390627893","doi":"10.1515/9781894725170-009","title":"Appendix C: A Charge Delivered to the Clergy of the Diocese of Newfoundland","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charge (physics); History; Genealogy; Physics; Particle physics","score_opus":0.05585132680035048,"score_gpt":0.30269205808877875,"score_spread":0.24684073128842826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390627893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001970203,0.0012337806,0.000004231048,0.0060730935,0.00046031008,0.00084713905,0.00008900898,0.000025200963,0.98929703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15499726,0.0004145398,0.000041149124,0.00021113238,0.0003826018,0.000012151222,0.000005792796,0.00001726963,0.8439181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982427,0.00007764901,0.0003166453,0.00021310087,0.0009070839,0.00024283757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867356,0.0001370341,0.00030835773,0.0003133733,0.00046558026,0.0001020914],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051517104,0.00020423872,0.00040533073,0.000022524544,0.00042603014,0.000025387988,0.00083663565,0.00019942375,0.0020568485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023410827,0.000092216425,0.00023565724,0.000077597266,0.00061440805,0.000057799603,0.0003541379,0.00018069334,0.00032454677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052624706,0.000034998495,0.00065803074,0.000045013,0.00043519432,0.0000011891339,0.063181505,0.000010247793,0.00003753103,0.7845345,0.14657487,0.004434284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015309999,0.000037210997,0.00055429945,0.00007751524,0.000058668214,2.1830762e-7,0.0021616705,0.0000018340091,0.000010291767,0.0020407944,0.994744,0.00016037465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045440804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10786919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84816915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021134967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013946914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390718725","doi":"10.1017/9781805431848.051","title":"Prolocutors of the York convocation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Art","score_opus":0.032230770010231446,"score_gpt":0.32003801905961143,"score_spread":0.28780724904938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390718725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000037184825,0.0019261226,0.0000012219292,0.0033164553,0.001016341,0.0004205024,0.000006263749,0.00014065644,0.9931353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019239157,0.0001220526,0.000063599204,0.00006322197,0.00039871398,0.00001957592,7.74263e-7,0.00005106791,0.98004186],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932927,0.000070518334,0.00009120198,0.0001214129,0.00027986537,0.00010770569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997383,0.000022025128,0.0000918996,0.0001012355,0.000027769636,0.000018804654],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013674298,0.0000810123,0.00012451375,0.000017049737,0.00009381612,0.000021465961,0.00020783713,0.00015841087,0.002208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009271796,0.000040766678,0.000082082006,0.00016809932,0.00039556855,0.0000109115645,0.000053701482,0.000091910166,0.00039799334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.7851297e-7,0.0000050745493,0.00013349621,0.00003781715,0.000047269725,5.7792338e-8,0.008179989,3.711989e-8,0.0000026561445,0.031087158,0.9601054,0.00040077357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018987692,0.0000027682686,0.00014904715,0.000084621446,0.000028962333,1.7790972e-8,0.0041277823,2.8104756e-7,0.00001355052,0.00028722826,0.99522614,0.00006061289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03148756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01717875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035120748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006224573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004965558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390734435","doi":"10.1017/9781805431831.003","title":"The convocation of 1775-80","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bishops; Ancient history; History; Theology; Geography; Art; Demography; Archaeology; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03298559154756186,"score_gpt":0.3472254395655972,"score_spread":0.31423984801803534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390734435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000005895385,0.0070520723,0.000004177809,0.004485665,0.00077062385,0.00023167986,0.000005511173,0.00013248104,0.9873119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0036186846,0.002100376,0.00006494196,0.00003687204,0.00046699445,0.000015778065,0.0000014958684,0.00004823221,0.9936466],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993456,0.000060497907,0.000100339545,0.00010865535,0.00026062952,0.00012425572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968064,0.00008483881,0.0000795261,0.00008809398,0.000044293833,0.000022590539],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022540028,0.00007584795,0.00011559085,0.000015201691,0.00017208618,0.000044025965,0.00017644424,0.00012430642,0.0017503813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013816584,0.00003881142,0.00006175892,0.00010488147,0.0004471571,0.000014560606,0.00004045697,0.00007785261,0.00088851596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.433383e-7,0.0000027508577,0.000014972088,0.000018124883,0.000050806382,1.3109707e-7,0.0037324156,1.1664541e-8,0.0000019230222,0.090753675,0.9035247,0.0019001557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018859393,0.000003338955,0.00004909133,0.000042718788,0.000019795623,1.5853672e-8,0.007184506,4.207513e-7,0.00000531977,0.0006868475,0.99193126,0.000057843925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029129937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034640513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09006683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000531983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036000005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390775872","doi":"10.61959/m230605x","title":"Facts and Stats: Married and Common-Law Couples in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Geography; Psychology; Genealogy; Political science; History","score_opus":0.11760385966327093,"score_gpt":0.36969971827871306,"score_spread":0.25209585861544215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390775872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53628474,0.008309862,3.1608312e-7,0.006855168,0.0018424442,0.0013384367,0.00040418893,0.00019438709,0.44477046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9425658,0.029703591,0.000040032483,0.00023023911,0.00018115714,0.000025164,0.000041984003,0.000025364276,0.027186688],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792624,0.00008693753,0.00030675597,0.00032601567,0.00092665857,0.00042737497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989929,0.00044953334,0.00012684782,0.000089222856,0.00015486097,0.00018659314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005711571,0.00021665146,0.000517719,0.000027667122,0.00057216274,0.00011350639,0.00012796649,0.00017701858,0.00008870571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029642088,0.00016825442,0.00002483287,0.00015189088,0.00043613487,0.00009262266,0.00018700739,0.0002708061,0.0000033634637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029855073,0.000047660138,0.5536612,0.0012520391,0.00080894015,0.000694969,0.058645625,0.000010687722,0.000008956831,0.01425768,0.34082395,0.029758384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023995139,0.000012924323,0.20734183,0.00016601587,0.00004129135,0.0000017868927,0.06293046,0.000008389273,0.0000028212778,0.0005197615,0.7282222,0.000512603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4175838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018464065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025002374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6861216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390786861","doi":"10.61959/m230605y","title":"Faits et chiffres : Les couples mariés et en union libre au Canada","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08846212718270918,"score_gpt":0.35422293642183145,"score_spread":0.26576080923912226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390786861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15996937,0.008042938,0.000014918556,0.10096132,0.010771278,0.0014830085,0.0008200914,0.0006500878,0.717287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33112594,0.048038483,0.00021886149,0.0006606692,0.0024958926,0.00010956371,0.00046284276,0.000109124565,0.6167786],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933282,0.0012985672,0.00083413965,0.0008949574,0.0024593836,0.001184719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960327,0.002181741,0.00054993184,0.00030600044,0.00053972873,0.00038987992],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022568763,0.00079452456,0.0010870135,0.00006569054,0.0020083669,0.00026443513,0.00082994625,0.0008733273,0.0012920374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020525374,0.00061288656,0.00034136945,0.00076511444,0.00083563704,0.0003878666,0.00080164016,0.001043583,0.0001383314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014526926,0.00014873035,0.121623635,0.0011448092,0.001624447,0.0003108373,0.051157616,0.00055758515,0.000039788123,0.07823749,0.6712399,0.07390065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011452204,0.000028149467,0.26862052,0.00032045416,0.0001102841,0.000003946873,0.025194753,0.000021109245,0.000005841256,0.0001014776,0.70486313,0.0006158116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99922365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17115659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00503022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011663388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391141301","doi":"10.12987/yale/9780300253238.001.0001","title":"An Empire of Laws","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Yale University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.05469699548364494,"score_gpt":0.2868837920637363,"score_spread":0.2321867965800914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391141301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006376797,0.000061482846,0.0000037607438,0.00006888253,0.0002801677,0.00035954308,0.0001617211,0.0002556866,0.9981711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015906604,0.00019109972,0.000065298715,0.000015763117,0.00023746725,7.6093664e-7,0.000027309328,0.000020436002,0.9978512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985863,0.00018788969,0.0001356038,0.000315266,0.00048130174,0.00029363993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990261,0.00013709799,0.00020730947,0.00025491617,0.00022759172,0.00014696203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019485674,0.00019009161,0.0003634631,0.00006423593,0.0007188709,0.00003088294,0.0006970695,0.00039265965,0.00003305425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003838924,0.00020277638,0.00017905408,0.000024896195,0.00088803354,0.000117047966,0.00024054572,0.0002546981,0.000023352699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067468434,0.000057115114,0.000093050316,0.0002640145,0.0004647318,0.00014643451,0.08476302,0.000013760112,0.000046980975,0.7276852,0.18188079,0.0045173983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017582376,0.00003155983,0.00011044099,0.00008812324,0.00010221203,8.449453e-8,0.004481642,0.0000027728543,0.00002421982,0.00022227046,0.99452543,0.00023541084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013843543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059663397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81264466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040648758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026863106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99272335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391209358","doi":"10.5040/9798400664496.0026","title":"Newfoundland","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.030776497212284388,"score_gpt":0.3200103280067757,"score_spread":0.28923383079449133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391209358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000023630125,0.0014826424,0.000012128942,0.00096857856,0.00065984926,0.00021446923,0.000003491912,0.00028304325,0.9963734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000068604626,0.00091684714,0.00061980856,0.00033013438,0.0006861215,0.000009604622,0.0000025167071,0.000086154694,0.9972802],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919564,0.00007878729,0.00006699008,0.00016033665,0.00026049098,0.00023778604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997368,0.000027344984,0.000055493747,0.00008487708,0.000020857944,0.000074623604],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001016219,0.00012078652,0.00017119563,0.000025504172,0.00025121032,0.00005217014,0.00013651093,0.00022879944,0.040478997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009243759,0.00008641246,0.000059997306,0.00009011834,0.00022580153,0.000022417216,0.000019841818,0.00008723607,0.0016643803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.8038068e-7,0.000005936033,0.0004790146,0.0000041333565,0.000029299166,0.0000010381439,0.0009937799,1.1559594e-8,1.6832514e-7,0.021501448,0.97646344,0.00052157295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000621281,0.0000027598549,0.0000865526,0.000014022413,0.000010640685,6.249875e-8,0.0009987769,3.1491343e-8,1.1669203e-7,0.00011077778,0.99856937,0.00014473405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12403136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25198033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12794897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011775159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004097276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391412895","doi":"10.3138/9781487535018-012","title":"11 Reasonable Accommodation, Diversity, and the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Diversity (politics); Accommodation; Law; Reasonable accommodation; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.026908603713492713,"score_gpt":0.21786563289176605,"score_spread":0.19095702917827334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391412895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00065176,0.001261327,0.0000035656788,0.00042210834,0.00014137902,0.00048566275,0.00007654091,0.000013630283,0.996944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057294868,0.0011138116,0.000045395536,0.000022062484,0.000042653413,1.11555394e-7,0.00000475382,0.0000065252893,0.94146985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989149,0.000076246266,0.00011627039,0.00018596752,0.00053885224,0.0001677903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887866,0.00021183395,0.00030738165,0.00019520693,0.00033698595,0.00006992052],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024628252,0.00014520728,0.00038151277,0.0000058816745,0.0013652443,0.000010595364,0.0005439497,0.0001573528,0.0002291388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033843484,0.00012621887,0.000097707576,0.000001081632,0.0010387095,0.0001244429,0.0012789841,0.00009877352,4.5460902e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015497385,0.000007817547,0.0007168819,0.00010407202,0.00039948325,0.000004523971,0.09893946,0.000007827444,0.0000018672482,0.86348796,0.035623334,0.00055179984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068759505,0.000011540603,0.0011872393,0.00007607605,0.00019302715,1.48092e-7,0.0035936278,0.000008753419,0.000004005093,0.00037764944,0.9936952,0.00016511376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99773514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9580719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052837195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029118365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391600492","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1435","title":"Where Can an Aboriginal Rights Holder Exercise Their Rights? Reflections From R. v. Desautel","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Supreme court; Constitution; Law; Political science; Human rights; Bill of rights; Fundamental rights; Indigenous rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.07186610764409139,"score_gpt":0.37879059672575316,"score_spread":0.30692448908166176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391600492","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16311836,0.52899563,0.000054900607,0.09093412,0.0067975945,0.0090948315,0.0011656545,0.005386672,0.19445223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40936753,0.5678348,0.0016060286,0.0021428538,0.0027569253,0.000820499,0.0003842117,0.000094172305,0.014992965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972143,0.00046529353,0.00042250857,0.0005661205,0.0006513347,0.00068044063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985378,0.00015600053,0.00014806357,0.00046306883,0.0003535711,0.0003414982],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007151046,0.0003273151,0.0006387305,0.00003292083,0.0031560636,0.00017085097,0.00058721885,0.00016005927,0.0013847182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044525466,0.00022170511,0.00025167072,0.0008549048,0.00052393717,0.00053701486,0.000066845554,0.0003059362,0.00071608473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045430475,0.00059993955,0.0020698616,0.0021250837,0.0007883508,0.00016732184,0.084651224,0.00001320902,0.0004908792,0.46163216,0.43153456,0.015881984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000147018,0.000020787602,0.0009056326,0.0019749368,0.00016381849,7.206001e-7,0.00060245383,0.0000046939863,0.00005001184,0.0081197005,0.9876563,0.00035395558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16310135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45834452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5561217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023922215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012153404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391689428","doi":"10.51644/9781554581368","title":"Uneasy Partners","year":2007,"lang":"de","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.06211244625565758,"score_gpt":0.366917758286935,"score_spread":0.3048053120312774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391689428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016244297,0.003976123,0.000037317805,0.0038411303,0.0030341046,0.0008065979,0.000022183367,0.00028083444,0.9878393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0060567083,0.0037927788,0.0004997191,0.0012728588,0.004454192,0.000021573314,0.00006454934,0.00004520321,0.9837924],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953653,0.00022071923,0.00069376215,0.00080731325,0.0015961109,0.0013167443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776053,0.00063125475,0.00038013837,0.00031944286,0.0003979413,0.00051067316],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011414337,0.00067850447,0.000861398,0.00008366074,0.0019314914,0.00022698223,0.00076437957,0.0011169729,0.008062064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039468956,0.0005222473,0.0005740314,0.00036422253,0.0024321314,0.00020031308,0.00029891962,0.00081520807,0.01589824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024382223,0.00008705458,0.0006315796,0.00009110242,0.00069362676,0.00006170188,0.027225027,0.000004215302,0.0000047226854,0.22294833,0.73915553,0.009072756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024007485,0.000045765926,0.0005644851,0.000097322496,0.00019783985,4.222988e-7,0.0095737325,0.0000046095543,0.000009318626,0.0013024934,0.9871664,0.0007975205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008610685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006546627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24801092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014433144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043557349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391705845","doi":"10.51644/9781554584079-006","title":"The Anglican Church in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Genealogy; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03421549571426797,"score_gpt":0.27470940735935706,"score_spread":0.2404939116450891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391705845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037967812,0.0028720913,8.7620705e-8,0.006811122,0.00044163497,0.00027416716,0.000007359906,0.000021486487,0.98919237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10009086,0.0020255446,0.000011382267,0.00026762366,0.0005004934,0.000013578852,0.0000022491838,0.000011993688,0.89707625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986551,0.000038661605,0.00018128434,0.00015029119,0.0005426305,0.0004320602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993074,0.00029572076,0.000082303755,0.00012859442,0.0000725941,0.00011337968],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032730296,0.00015517646,0.00019806779,0.000011200338,0.000790762,0.000041517353,0.00032904558,0.00012675802,0.0015670372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008166085,0.00008984627,0.000056712463,0.000028862618,0.0003030511,0.000050068717,0.000089512505,0.00029527792,0.000073379204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003400004,0.0000034711434,0.0020736807,0.000005581329,0.00006112666,0.000011020542,0.007984937,3.3191813e-7,9.42884e-7,0.84457856,0.10343189,0.041845035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034905606,0.000001898718,0.0047955317,0.000011105965,0.000007383478,1.261034e-7,0.0036791149,2.2185502e-7,3.938894e-7,0.0010299551,0.99028575,0.0001536369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99682766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8868538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020838762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079918804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391759235","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-46367-9_3","title":"The Last Sceptic: Santayana, Descartes, and the External World","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave companions.","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03150320198748493,"score_gpt":0.2884136240097274,"score_spread":0.2569104220222425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391759235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014045146,0.055976994,0.00002198375,0.011133557,0.0015038812,0.0009282872,0.000041869906,0.0001548851,0.9300981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42462572,0.016115455,0.000112346475,0.0003521893,0.0018686178,0.00007398179,0.000011351395,0.00004528161,0.55679506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785393,0.00019502953,0.00037389292,0.0004070698,0.0007010091,0.00046905465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976678,0.0015424656,0.00018196477,0.00029529165,0.000160165,0.00015229579],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010974295,0.0003739249,0.00045037013,0.000053513053,0.0033869066,0.0007270464,0.0005961357,0.00015170798,0.0002829844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014604424,0.00018615593,0.00030518096,0.000098514014,0.0036694806,0.000028456867,0.00037550795,0.00074410444,0.0003351676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011964925,0.0000019945835,0.00008457905,0.000013200029,0.00017672012,0.0000067921196,0.0052055223,4.4907762e-7,0.0000017000705,0.97836846,0.0072393087,0.00888929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025198748,0.000009830385,0.0014098319,0.00025498238,0.00020450591,0.000003508802,0.0018893657,0.000022317694,7.7045524e-7,0.23655371,0.7591263,0.0002728546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021991853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04330688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.751887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020672365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006701096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391858365","doi":"10.2307/jj.11955033.7","title":"Revitalizing Canada’s Indigenous Constitution:","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Indigenous; Political science; Geography; Law; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.034361778760149876,"score_gpt":0.24232353270097887,"score_spread":0.207961753940829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391858365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000081874605,0.000011206338,0.0000029803816,0.00083293044,0.0008028883,0.0007883998,0.0006544206,0.00039064934,0.99650836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022646862,0.00086847495,0.000057335325,0.00015417261,0.000265346,0.0000022141278,0.000040739476,0.00003491501,0.99631214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974629,0.00012708218,0.00026799567,0.0005888558,0.0009128687,0.00064026116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985038,0.0001915371,0.00032166077,0.00031356755,0.00036240366,0.0003070287],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022121232,0.00043437557,0.000571957,0.00010017073,0.003927416,0.00006754228,0.00063462486,0.00050351175,0.000058371388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008755143,0.00047514134,0.00022975756,0.000029384806,0.0009086869,0.00014667517,0.0004818663,0.0005473729,0.00003858157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014091135,0.0000040780615,0.00000583652,0.000063164814,0.00025867135,0.0005386585,0.0030664813,0.0000072853363,5.4347475e-7,0.979103,0.016428085,0.00051008485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022079192,0.000015072229,0.000016796495,0.00023357963,0.00019105681,8.1902243e-7,0.0022712096,3.0397155e-7,0.000008802779,0.00026800783,0.9962038,0.0005697772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9048074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12426168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9797757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009461335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391869491","doi":"10.51644/9780889205666-014","title":"Publications Of The Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; History","score_opus":0.05176179639387857,"score_gpt":0.2713781951555861,"score_spread":0.21961639876170752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391869491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000084320745,0.0008420846,0.000011954044,0.017590087,0.00048123463,0.0007108737,0.00013599244,0.000043482913,0.98017585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006778911,0.000076242606,0.0003958253,0.00049222464,0.00039570365,0.000047923175,0.000027491089,0.000017215594,0.9917685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989356,0.000014132155,0.00022360418,0.00020475846,0.0003329584,0.00028893733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989909,0.00010771275,0.00019217978,0.00019914724,0.00039509026,0.000114977396],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022542728,0.00015411415,0.00021354895,0.00002538986,0.001029135,0.000029405937,0.00044170083,0.0003150758,0.00094991113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097839875,0.00010595811,0.00061819825,0.00003140046,0.00083502865,0.000100869875,0.00004484597,0.00018134757,0.000014362498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.6792332e-7,0.0000021327558,0.000028201317,0.000005606684,0.000036891244,1.1806092e-8,0.0012666562,4.410111e-7,8.8988907e-7,0.50016457,0.4983959,0.000098543256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005487201,0.0000038322387,0.00046596362,0.000012024137,0.000058268728,5.6044783e-8,0.00048380316,0.0000023500736,0.0000011319045,0.0027893768,0.99598384,0.00014447795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86657035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9703301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49758798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027814212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014726154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392031113","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197744512.003.0003","title":"British Columbia Lodge No. 1","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Archaeology; History; Geography","score_opus":0.027365693885871935,"score_gpt":0.2773402617147935,"score_spread":0.24997456782892155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392031113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003741798,0.002445298,4.742298e-7,0.0009945692,0.0025020635,0.00041832088,0.000044710283,0.00042420372,0.99313295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00038284998,0.002435995,0.00010978212,0.00031441465,0.002335149,0.000017013954,0.000017480408,0.000042894007,0.9943444],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832255,0.000015938389,0.0002466275,0.00044038033,0.0006120869,0.00036244167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992762,0.00008732971,0.000072031515,0.00012769093,0.00028592034,0.00015081148],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020484354,0.00017735947,0.00035979928,0.000013527353,0.00064670376,0.0011808594,0.0002878167,0.00046163128,0.062499296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011462977,0.00023603957,0.00026956687,0.00003367203,0.0006120386,0.00010634864,0.00019039973,0.00040961325,0.0108669],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.702923e-7,0.000004447306,0.000026492406,0.000034757362,0.00010768535,0.000056529487,0.0011937051,1.6595262e-8,3.549425e-7,0.06335952,0.93169653,0.0035194575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048305996,0.000013811176,0.00008963379,0.00018407086,0.000060731236,0.0000012523356,0.0002817156,3.701074e-7,6.569788e-8,0.019313999,0.9796602,0.0003458397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.328284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7853914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45710742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036563768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008454254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392054503","doi":"10.51644/9780889208407-005","title":"The Church of England in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Art; Archaeology","score_opus":0.021161782710652183,"score_gpt":0.2537172548009315,"score_spread":0.2325554720902793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392054503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006543785,0.0024152144,5.3274397e-7,0.0016561922,0.0002630682,0.00019367998,0.000012553722,0.000010801732,0.9947936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14959684,0.0011494285,0.000009144972,0.000028114275,0.00020544243,0.000004274378,0.000003293549,0.000006528864,0.84899694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899256,0.000030700616,0.00020525097,0.000119218355,0.00045647615,0.00019577393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992105,0.00054596993,0.00006782377,0.000074803465,0.000071537186,0.000029361909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024555987,0.000107313375,0.00018842895,0.000012371695,0.00031168095,0.000024888508,0.00020145143,0.000101676625,0.00037113015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055443492,0.000061227125,0.000048798138,0.000025102414,0.00025067333,0.000028665858,0.000033369706,0.00016941079,0.0000037185757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008508855,0.0000057257103,0.0038046727,0.00004187681,0.00012009301,0.000027988866,0.008158497,0.000015582367,0.0000030779843,0.73138964,0.21838237,0.038041983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054119562,0.0000027518802,0.003652386,0.000029667728,0.0000051481506,5.0486406e-8,0.0007875128,0.0000019127854,0.000001375094,0.0007982184,0.9945729,0.00009395748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9984317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7761905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008732339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088687625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4063615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392089614","doi":"10.51644/9780889208957-003","title":"Notes From The Authors","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.05408763435326005,"score_gpt":0.30404536589944287,"score_spread":0.2499577315461828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392089614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008146927,0.0013083655,0.00001684849,0.019596716,0.00058296684,0.0002978313,0.00005605866,0.00015703693,0.9779027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011605596,0.00035919325,0.00023272884,0.00055763364,0.0020370823,0.000007781153,0.000030452402,0.000020315641,0.9851492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986482,0.000048956343,0.00020019096,0.0002740166,0.0005687177,0.0002598851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868625,0.0008420642,0.00012480447,0.00017685132,0.00010555745,0.00006449258],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022990446,0.00022619992,0.00025431224,0.000009992302,0.0012483771,0.00013414113,0.00041143526,0.0003747466,0.0040658303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020020288,0.0001233282,0.00020409795,0.00002164191,0.00070140744,0.00006415866,0.00011709479,0.00033095016,0.0008928971],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021037008,0.000005318962,0.00038937083,0.0000018936843,0.00011342724,0.0000039437823,0.009004674,0.0000015143066,0.000002035086,0.5905772,0.39458165,0.0053168912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041808456,0.0000040343125,0.0013662729,0.000025039262,0.00004083092,3.0047453e-8,0.00075031904,6.5113335e-7,0.0000023196221,0.024646731,0.9729082,0.00021375442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14982504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.081935875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5783266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017353005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049392635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392090891","doi":"10.53386/nilq.v74i4.1024","title":"Assisted Dying Bill [HL]: ignorance within the House?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Parliament; Context (archaeology); Commit; Law; Assisted suicide; Legislature; House of Representatives; Political science; Politics; History","score_opus":0.023755549021291154,"score_gpt":0.28638628133966654,"score_spread":0.26263073231837536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392090891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.946085,0.003781719,0.00015298939,0.02646256,0.0025247883,0.0006433716,0.000017604969,0.0012173473,0.019114638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99256796,0.000031873857,0.000064094085,0.0002277095,0.00088806666,0.00005840586,0.0000028606962,0.00004115273,0.006117892],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978193,0.00031932944,0.00033607672,0.0003991078,0.0006445032,0.000481692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912465,0.00031194824,0.00009692788,0.00022525861,0.000118699965,0.00012249153],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007375401,0.00023525741,0.00024512177,0.000038207654,0.0015264946,0.00078101136,0.00041243335,0.00014688271,0.000078829114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008053365,0.0001202046,0.00017396407,0.0004732604,0.00044137583,0.00047193115,0.000022131337,0.00047893848,0.00063182676],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066822155,0.000119074735,0.03584669,0.00008803981,0.00047850955,0.00022181521,0.7964605,0.00007239581,0.00037247062,0.016203567,0.0063713244,0.14369877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007602421,0.00043432618,0.059363905,0.00034385215,0.00020580894,0.000024995945,0.11554069,0.0007177386,0.000029344288,0.0023183695,0.81918347,0.001077264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05626025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13420731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81281215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021810493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001478586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392669586","doi":"10.7202/1109763ar","title":"Equality and the Notwithstanding Clause : Considering the Nature and Application of Section 28 of the Canadian Charter","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Political science; Linguistics; Law; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01632091957409496,"score_gpt":0.2754887323100645,"score_spread":0.2591678127359695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392669586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98693526,0.00017859865,0.000044111945,0.01040504,0.00008435471,0.0003187799,0.000009064025,0.000014114989,0.0020106833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993186,0.00009954484,0.000012443658,0.00021231495,0.00005665035,0.000014853116,5.4759033e-7,0.0000028747907,0.00028214234],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993507,0.00015513555,0.000093295006,0.00008312287,0.00018202461,0.00013568558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994069,0.0003357725,0.00008005256,0.00008555113,0.00005748471,0.00003423784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010879707,0.000046148696,0.00008859718,0.000015084947,0.0012433772,0.000032810625,0.000095404146,0.00012793446,0.0000020542454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004169211,0.000023573031,0.000030175766,0.00020989923,0.0014254667,0.00004205166,0.000027338783,0.0002557395,2.8024172e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029882045,0.0000044671056,0.07661186,0.00007093404,0.00011473355,5.3420064e-7,0.5440597,0.00003540768,0.0013535904,0.37195516,0.00052323245,0.0052405004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007305538,0.000013739171,0.77901524,0.000058791855,0.00011105979,0.0000030101444,0.15454309,0.0010007056,0.0008995837,0.031381283,0.0320447,0.00019824732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23024109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6293991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70240337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030463838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037921738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95631784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392762064","doi":"10.1558/jsrnc.23942","title":"Mother Earth, Cultural Authenticity, and Canadian Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Study of Religion Nature and Culture","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Earth (classical element); Law; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01602644414647663,"score_gpt":0.32860262003340557,"score_spread":0.31257617588692893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392762064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8488688,0.10306501,0.0000064174637,0.03148962,0.0023089892,0.0015046856,0.00003550725,0.0000594351,0.012661528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847442,0.0052871667,0.00004365466,0.0004004748,0.0005660905,0.000008930807,7.8839975e-7,0.000007732387,0.008940963],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908334,0.00007353694,0.00015842522,0.00015038805,0.00029830603,0.00023597576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943686,0.00009787,0.00005897366,0.000055736564,0.00019733382,0.00015320942],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040593115,0.00012672761,0.00017096844,0.000029981824,0.0023065237,0.00039098578,0.00015486973,0.00019217367,0.00001048519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008821712,0.00005991555,0.000098061806,0.0001510224,0.00023684504,0.00020284015,0.000030928342,0.0005839985,0.0000014578585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060044284,0.00008568657,0.0012559118,0.00008055429,0.0009208947,0.000026181027,0.56063527,0.0000060795614,0.00022434446,0.17264068,0.25853214,0.0055321925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002995362,0.00016505913,0.0011422008,0.00006551707,0.00017139464,0.000022169932,0.06632313,0.000013299737,0.000014053222,0.0041616713,0.9275095,0.00011247796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06368347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3258438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6689773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004457907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003710309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393024726","doi":"10.5040/9798765110164.ch-32","title":"Newfoundland","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.033915502105101254,"score_gpt":0.3399525326334578,"score_spread":0.30603703052835657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393024726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000011394571,0.0056173126,0.00000372712,0.002876253,0.001230007,0.00017996093,0.0000069686125,0.0006984434,0.9893862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00014945849,0.0008517177,0.00023069125,0.00016270576,0.0019029245,0.000011357364,0.0000023531697,0.00014109579,0.9965477],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927044,0.000033788074,0.00006241201,0.00018385438,0.00025213737,0.00019735555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99980533,0.000018492707,0.0000282043,0.00007323192,0.00001367823,0.00006106194],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008966891,0.000113867456,0.0001487924,0.000033906825,0.00011132294,0.00010475379,0.00013606873,0.00020296092,0.023921516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048889928,0.00007630501,0.00007071824,0.000101966856,0.0002016311,0.000019104258,0.000049984246,0.00011386604,0.0138298],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.6230051e-7,0.0000029382584,0.000050469313,0.000017517603,0.000049348055,0.0000033585834,0.0024495723,4.5348614e-9,1.6611196e-7,0.029815841,0.9669629,0.0006477244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025335588,0.0000025150503,0.000022194157,0.000051995456,0.00002147894,6.441879e-8,0.0014065267,1.02860454e-7,5.5814386e-8,0.0005968809,0.99774635,0.00012652736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16137825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29545408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13407582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011380853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003026995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98693806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393395848","doi":"","title":"The reception of polygamie in French and in Canadian law with respect to marriage and its effects","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"BC Cancer Agency; China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Law; Genealogy; Political science; History","score_opus":0.02389578717396599,"score_gpt":0.3008607240403981,"score_spread":0.2769649368664321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393395848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9319,0.0034035468,4.7317823e-7,0.016007194,0.00030615096,0.0012699097,0.000014341609,0.0000070039387,0.047091376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99168795,0.002164072,0.00014911538,0.00010280255,0.00008725181,0.00007372175,0.0000016137548,0.000008009908,0.005725483],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980918,0.00040939313,0.00025219753,0.00042388868,0.00028517412,0.00053752185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988153,0.00045602905,0.00014721682,0.0001967178,0.00009430371,0.00029041193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011852421,0.00023124326,0.0004062155,0.000061804545,0.000890005,0.00016700679,0.00029991622,0.00025394492,0.000030730684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006339418,0.00014444403,0.000028548831,0.00016969588,0.0007922667,0.00014369487,0.00027326363,0.0003619515,0.000008450528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017838649,0.000076166805,0.45756057,0.0005681239,0.00019824978,0.00007522807,0.15173942,0.00007729932,0.0005979607,0.36153033,0.00088813994,0.026510136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004011941,0.00010568846,0.97298026,0.0006807367,0.000020407084,7.9573624e-7,0.0026657775,0.000038096794,0.00012516543,0.0014839413,0.021214426,0.00028349142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98766476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5154197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069899415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018865644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6845288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393416226","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-11945-4_27-3","title":"Memoirs of Modern Philosophers by Elizabeth Hamilton","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University","funders":"","keywords":"Memoir; Philosophy; History; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.04058052548093509,"score_gpt":0.30157323689060944,"score_spread":0.26099271140967434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393416226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000061134226,0.0116516305,0.000013765226,0.0032281762,0.00053940905,0.00039163698,0.000099218836,0.00020244229,0.9838126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01851632,0.0040955674,0.00014668866,0.000184295,0.00043757737,0.000009524229,0.000023927192,0.000050919625,0.9765352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799037,0.000024750312,0.00036816174,0.0004397372,0.00085159397,0.00032536034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921817,0.00011260467,0.00016887307,0.00018756461,0.00017981915,0.00013294883],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023826225,0.0003412416,0.0005338259,0.000045724577,0.00031133284,0.000056607743,0.0003676128,0.0005021835,0.0016102087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000379576,0.00026211774,0.00031668483,0.000047131107,0.0008589582,0.000104233215,0.00011595049,0.0003663139,0.00039997016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007164376,0.000014924404,0.0000056607923,0.00011626718,0.00042936727,0.0000059294603,0.022616655,0.0000037207915,0.00008948903,0.8573844,0.115123816,0.0042026443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007952708,0.000024303068,0.0000012591604,0.00013791466,0.000121737554,1.2003449e-7,0.00085516024,0.000012874691,0.00004274935,0.16332671,0.8350599,0.00033778563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030318021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017711181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7199361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003398735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000683712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394914589","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.8579","title":"Swimming Up Niagara Falls! The Battle to Get Disability Rights Added to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Battle; Political science; Law; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03491845498282878,"score_gpt":0.3268648556685373,"score_spread":0.29194640068570854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394914589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95114416,0.00035994727,0.00003047063,0.03179729,0.001720888,0.0014295308,0.00011473804,0.00005043689,0.01335252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739236,0.0000058599185,0.00013321827,0.0004886368,0.00065080315,0.00006093929,0.0000014474623,0.00001049756,0.001256254],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824697,0.00015944181,0.00028685998,0.00035121926,0.00052807434,0.0004274596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983467,0.00077849795,0.00005460261,0.0003039311,0.00017905775,0.00033724384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070432725,0.00016843622,0.00025348793,0.000058092148,0.0010312299,0.00031308507,0.000736829,0.00008732592,0.00020778533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005586268,0.00009155032,0.00007520476,0.00046058567,0.0005713673,0.00028224086,0.00024880917,0.00018288824,0.000114611874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017288691,0.00016815617,0.006782003,0.0005899532,0.0005764922,0.000027546428,0.81263554,0.0004296282,0.00076269713,0.031658113,0.13836077,0.007836205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029391004,0.00015106516,0.14399996,0.00039446552,0.0005012466,0.0000016001761,0.012516418,0.000112424525,0.0012444583,0.0012734695,0.8389074,0.00060359266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51845545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8104465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8001191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022608854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010601151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7931491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395458533","doi":"10.1515/9780228020219-004","title":"1 An Historic Canadian Compromise: Forty Years after the Patriation of the Constitution, Should We Cheer a Little?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Constitution; History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027766954085768427,"score_gpt":0.24036175159116316,"score_spread":0.21259479750539473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395458533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015976,0.000050349077,0.0000025281226,0.002625682,0.0008927061,0.0010774495,0.0008069553,0.000088710614,0.99429584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23303625,0.00024188733,0.000020978367,0.00011113776,0.00020054332,0.00000561931,0.00001230522,0.00001944695,0.7663518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983955,0.00013721058,0.00021134736,0.00037113106,0.0005619453,0.00032287036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887717,0.000076460885,0.00021358965,0.00038183882,0.00026000844,0.00019096203],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024301469,0.0002654995,0.00030548152,0.000090866146,0.0013064807,0.000054315344,0.00064604427,0.00042093097,0.00008547514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028870034,0.00018870692,0.00028487778,0.000041048792,0.0011174949,0.00013139898,0.00019840746,0.0005014495,0.000011900008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036724014,0.0000073292763,0.00004823842,0.000047466285,0.00019364934,0.000029785417,0.008465178,0.000012324225,0.0000021122773,0.98582333,0.0048920955,0.00044173372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016579642,0.000015170811,0.000390113,0.00012109885,0.00031676592,3.4048145e-7,0.000903095,0.0000040876766,0.000006247722,0.00085403584,0.9969759,0.00024732406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40977105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02049562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99208385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019946024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029621978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686867","doi":"10.29173/mlj1321","title":"In Memoriam – Marcel André Desautels","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alma mater; Art; Philosophy; Art history; Medicine; Surgery","score_opus":0.04922164148513974,"score_gpt":0.32404173038876416,"score_spread":0.2748200889036244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90206194,0.0003237481,0.000010587992,0.017910615,0.0063362583,0.00029418484,0.0000048293005,0.00017195473,0.07288587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939067,0.0007638616,0.00020869747,0.00042727843,0.0036953152,0.000010255636,0.0000011111774,0.000012509155,0.00097428274],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829954,0.00023486883,0.00024794863,0.00014393142,0.0005391249,0.0005345687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994435,0.00014231885,0.00008540086,0.00007158475,0.000101788624,0.00015544529],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011654125,0.000111451234,0.00018196585,0.00006519484,0.0017732326,0.00024512562,0.00029803874,0.000087222885,0.00030613478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021395193,0.000090230176,0.000089292254,0.00046042088,0.00025053875,0.0004400338,0.0000927593,0.00034024092,0.00050864654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012095029,0.00031468752,0.070532,0.00006859886,0.00030304588,0.0028756948,0.14033155,0.00030804222,0.0007043589,0.18595013,0.5393079,0.059183013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063674245,0.000032249045,0.044145692,0.0000414153,0.000013281634,0.000020935606,0.12516911,0.00002007976,0.000056990582,0.013047186,0.8165618,0.00025451893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054326896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39811724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34379035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003488892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036953803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715366","doi":"10.29173/mlj1284","title":"The Troubled History of the Defence of Duress and Excluded Offences: Could the Reasoned Use of Mitigation on Sentencing Prevent Duress from (Further) Becoming Archaic, Gendered, and Completely Inaccessible?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; Northern Ontario Academic Medicine Association; Thunder Bay Regional Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal code; Supreme court; Criminal law; Criminology; Perspective (graphical); Code (set theory); Sociology; Self defense; Penal code; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.095224158221756,"score_gpt":0.2857996469679759,"score_spread":0.19057548874621988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99466467,0.002158815,0.000013446038,0.002107854,0.00043942104,0.00037810137,0.00002399646,0.000006132148,0.00020754503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99917245,0.00047000582,0.00009895447,0.00010889322,0.00008988898,0.000017405566,7.935396e-7,0.0000073489723,0.00003425102],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713707,0.0011696805,0.00043979456,0.00015707065,0.0008705521,0.00022583028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759126,0.0011464634,0.00085698994,0.00016478501,0.00018311686,0.00005736],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012599427,0.00012496667,0.0002511344,0.000020742724,0.0026201792,0.00007621904,0.000505853,0.00003927102,0.000021211381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029460393,0.00006577202,0.000099154124,0.00011051716,0.0013642816,0.00018901918,0.00028975046,0.00039625168,7.512416e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013836097,0.0006040321,0.24492094,0.0002518521,0.0012571595,0.000021718763,0.65203464,0.0017436673,0.033936307,0.041551232,0.002415489,0.019879352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012821188,0.00018149611,0.3580642,0.00038652227,0.00019220769,0.000019941124,0.6275756,0.0005371905,0.0015999461,0.0046469043,0.0052587627,0.00025513844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.097580664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19621903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11314328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042581145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000100473415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99867827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715372","doi":"10.29173/mlj1287","title":"The Availability of the Common Law Defence of Duress to Principals Charged with Murder: An Analysis of the Conflicting Appellate Decisions in R v Willis (TAW) and R v Aravena","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Appeal; Common law; Charter; Political science; Subject (documents); Criminal code; Criminal law","score_opus":0.03158350375343633,"score_gpt":0.30953558830065786,"score_spread":0.27795208454722153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99643904,0.00018834409,0.0000029969287,0.0017301139,0.000087446075,0.0003796041,0.000023494391,0.000003922862,0.0011450477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99970526,0.00007308302,0.000044232303,0.00012079173,0.000025265539,0.000009920587,2.8882343e-7,0.000004890424,0.000016294855],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970734,0.0011521757,0.0005071158,0.00015954839,0.00085980084,0.00024794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981589,0.00068622344,0.00055646297,0.00030016998,0.00022293096,0.000075365206],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027131636,0.00010641171,0.0003456197,0.000029811035,0.0035530643,0.00006419185,0.00076325895,0.00003283741,0.000028105356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030492776,0.000049495393,0.00014581726,0.0008331838,0.0010806621,0.00009813785,0.00037438914,0.00037024246,1.7520341e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013111795,0.00015897866,0.8883275,0.000010745836,0.00042465364,0.0000021590226,0.07711673,0.0069905357,0.0007995711,0.02415564,0.000017264412,0.0018651513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003249482,0.00009317188,0.8150579,0.00006791144,0.00025919278,0.0000044143335,0.17634381,0.00025288574,0.00069610414,0.00075210247,0.0060208305,0.00012676563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.099251464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7871832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6879318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015485393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041435567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715378","doi":"10.29173/mlj1282","title":"The Slow Death of the Reasonable Steps Requirement for the Mistake of Age Defence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Legislature; Mistake; Law; Mens rea; Appeal; Plaintiff; Legislative history; Statutory law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Criminal code; Judicial interpretation; Criminal law; Criminology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0693075581115432,"score_gpt":0.30366684533129534,"score_spread":0.23435928721975213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87338674,0.009936432,0.0002124859,0.04375874,0.0047338153,0.003129283,0.000107006366,0.000043198466,0.06469231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99829555,0.00023688146,0.00014440437,0.00016291288,0.0002580023,0.000054133732,2.99699e-7,0.0000066069924,0.0008411955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980141,0.0003860403,0.00030470866,0.00009726381,0.00088773936,0.00031015542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985242,0.00064286607,0.0003895818,0.00018494058,0.00021588473,0.000042525477],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00228174,0.00008653361,0.00013942286,0.000005847293,0.009853447,0.00010927964,0.0009843004,0.000022467893,0.00005316279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034119928,0.000038386366,0.00020869938,0.00013627592,0.0006092543,0.00008198192,0.00022374428,0.0002590236,7.387915e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027418978,0.0002651612,0.016764639,0.000058865167,0.00065885735,0.000014084897,0.058110636,0.0008445177,0.0012591195,0.8644668,0.031067483,0.026215691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035327292,0.000094680836,0.013168553,0.00002771029,0.000089149944,0.000007311099,0.2922964,0.00002882271,0.00027281756,0.00757621,0.685987,0.00009806287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03024288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10616893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85689056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031209656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073156116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715964","doi":"10.29173/mlj1144","title":"Introduction from the Manitoba Law Journal – The Life and Works of Chief Justice Hugh Amos Robson","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.03482916747232801,"score_gpt":0.26642612660168985,"score_spread":0.23159695912936185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.683554,0.007511455,0.00022715695,0.29828897,0.0038048853,0.00048179473,0.00001749755,0.000058956997,0.0060552773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714437,0.0020602983,0.00032625534,0.0033560835,0.022781145,0.0000040410005,0.0000014218206,0.000016140111,0.0000109307675],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972783,0.0007555766,0.0004956422,0.00021570444,0.0008466385,0.00040815893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982469,0.00047591102,0.0004998275,0.00013884393,0.00033894647,0.00029957393],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011483385,0.00020435687,0.00030136658,0.000011318618,0.007108189,0.0010022278,0.0006483033,0.00012325028,0.00020175475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008617932,0.000109890076,0.00016120494,0.00022339892,0.001093825,0.0006446149,0.00016874548,0.0012861651,0.000023036502],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010670772,0.00045993165,0.01722631,0.00013026198,0.0030694937,0.00017700586,0.2863545,0.0014277822,0.0016619343,0.23877628,0.29803592,0.15161352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074275874,0.00012714577,0.016163846,0.00008461712,0.0005411156,0.0000643212,0.65416104,0.00006071039,0.00008681413,0.0028835554,0.3248146,0.0002694543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07352179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3491014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36780655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001483361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047123198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99418443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396716920","doi":"10.29173/mlj980","title":"Issue Overview and Introduction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.05280174504289466,"score_gpt":0.33921114073490916,"score_spread":0.2864093956920145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396716920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7122256,0.005837235,0.000016861835,0.16231857,0.007156709,0.00033180616,0.0000031059844,0.000083504725,0.1120266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854202,0.0031528675,0.00029912218,0.00024195288,0.010191189,0.0000024144601,2.6671574e-7,0.00000584148,0.0006861214],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991834,0.000099212884,0.00012087264,0.00011211758,0.00026969705,0.00021470505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994742,0.000021726857,0.00016043265,0.00011271011,0.00011883678,0.000112092326],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005623268,0.000074976175,0.0001223652,0.000009519362,0.008248478,0.0008669149,0.00022919281,0.000050371968,0.00027176228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028171908,0.000057335747,0.000043464024,0.000019066416,0.00050654996,0.0006136981,0.000088155306,0.00019777073,0.00008577797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003790005,0.000099963385,0.03192876,0.000058021833,0.00022708774,0.000071001225,0.029125422,0.0000030911174,0.00028911477,0.33632427,0.10746671,0.49436867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016387235,0.00001760951,0.040488753,0.000016564582,0.000019879855,0.0000181229,0.023152795,0.0000012046179,0.000027971742,0.003116456,0.93288255,0.000094196585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058603305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23752044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82541585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000119963835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010995622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99304265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396784731","doi":"10.7202/1111194ar","title":"Gatekeeping Reconciliation: The Supreme Court of Canada’s Piecemeal Erosion of Aboriginal Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Section (typography); Context (archaeology); Charter; Sociology; History; Business","score_opus":0.02823347896043296,"score_gpt":0.3104470827724549,"score_spread":0.282213603812022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396784731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.073615074,0.24844232,0.000017182618,0.14384994,0.002997538,0.0045418157,0.0002531562,0.00011119411,0.5261718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872628,0.01016568,0.00010078181,0.0010104624,0.00012785637,0.00007129359,0.000008693865,0.000006239122,0.0012462209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979159,0.0004905962,0.00041419407,0.00014447786,0.00081846863,0.00021635549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990647,0.00016137792,0.0003420832,0.00015868715,0.00022061034,0.00005255752],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013749838,0.00009154844,0.00033003927,0.0000061121013,0.0014763271,0.0000080895325,0.00034548296,0.000020561598,0.00096709875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009954566,0.000060619957,0.00009618983,0.00025294212,0.00028203992,0.000079452206,0.00004469433,0.00014057211,0.000002547025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008297336,0.00007572039,0.0013163926,0.0009093247,0.00008287768,0.000003622667,0.0078814095,0.00003032712,0.0001287205,0.83603984,0.1508803,0.0026431794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080345846,0.000020431211,0.0010954409,0.00046953635,0.00004677406,6.507661e-7,0.00048943365,0.0000033688211,0.000051047682,0.00026046147,0.997401,0.00008153373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8223768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8834199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9136477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004930085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005377979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396791495","doi":"10.4324/9781003496236-3","title":"Images and Three Traditional Subjects of Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06657831899299822,"score_gpt":0.2708167723471757,"score_spread":0.2042384533541775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396791495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000039902574,0.002063155,0.0000018584788,0.0050488575,0.0003343751,0.00020736664,0.00062779343,0.000037323684,0.9916394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19862102,0.00095085247,0.00030335586,0.0003303922,0.00065723725,0.000010347067,0.00006814532,0.000013158246,0.7990455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990447,0.000007706857,0.00016296226,0.00021607621,0.00037428353,0.0001942498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994439,0.0001321199,0.000047345908,0.00005022187,0.00013658064,0.00018981476],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001359305,0.0001573166,0.00022330254,0.000115842515,0.0005473966,0.00006118112,0.000100837926,0.00021260626,0.0022762262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029440918,0.00012781347,0.00009403919,0.000042154417,0.004681065,0.00009675451,0.000029569972,0.00018992441,0.00009285231],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010070462,0.0000019571216,0.000024538978,0.000022131928,0.00008681552,0.0000130202525,0.00057751476,1.9116574e-7,0.000002666582,0.98426366,0.014887206,0.00011930382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053631422,0.000009887573,0.00028004812,0.00008020694,0.000047676458,0.000002319519,0.00024567058,4.341106e-7,0.0000052062755,0.23738243,0.7617288,0.00016365536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52146524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91582495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7468812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022738268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004565698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396887528","doi":"10.29173/mlj955","title":"Full-Time Teachers, Recorders &amp; Librarians of the Manitoba Law School and of the Faculty of Law, University of Manitoba","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03220198426901122,"score_gpt":0.24874069991692802,"score_spread":0.2165387156479168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396887528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97411454,0.00016425157,0.000015191864,0.004123082,0.00034298154,0.0003601237,0.00011291659,0.000017159291,0.020749763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99862313,0.00020390352,0.00046904464,0.00008511201,0.00017184376,6.3301627e-7,7.6869225e-7,0.000012792122,0.00043279512],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770635,0.00061622664,0.00044318463,0.00019066139,0.0007173061,0.00032627527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819934,0.00021941788,0.00080413214,0.00028188707,0.00036159976,0.00013363469],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069134234,0.00018743536,0.00041357303,0.000024339286,0.0014183373,0.000043977605,0.00093725446,0.00016145613,0.00020374556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020245856,0.00010107789,0.00030104487,0.00019806076,0.0030097484,0.00049748033,0.0003758153,0.0003220947,0.000010875927],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011291223,0.0012319334,0.41620785,0.00040908495,0.0031022802,0.00002368997,0.10228219,0.00005655591,0.07533182,0.3346556,0.03720611,0.028363751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037936352,0.000343945,0.2022648,0.0011877993,0.0006453567,0.000040278588,0.4786912,0.0000038521202,0.0058611133,0.011251566,0.2951761,0.0007403711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25478008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80327755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54849744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002211784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009649102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398234539","doi":"10.3366/irss.2024.0028","title":"John Campbell’s Authorship of <i>Reflections on the Rise and Progress of the British Constitution</i> (London, 1761)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Scottish Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; History; Philosophy; Sociology; Art history; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06780227625654527,"score_gpt":0.4078452706375628,"score_spread":0.34004299438101754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398234539","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056999784,0.84453195,0.0000063021093,0.05394553,0.001941066,0.0011655306,0.00013581228,0.000039502116,0.04123454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76360196,0.23509148,0.00007176804,0.0001843482,0.000110606445,0.00007189147,6.680963e-7,0.0000034260197,0.00086382875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839824,0.00024254179,0.00042566692,0.0001706217,0.0006403737,0.00012257401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982928,0.000644438,0.0002389568,0.00009833009,0.0007000349,0.000025414502],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010267921,0.00010027,0.0003006183,0.000023255929,0.000646139,0.00006981732,0.00031763583,0.00003516529,0.000043754208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028121937,0.000058747024,0.0001676459,0.00033955037,0.0030269327,0.00012316594,0.00016937462,0.00015192638,0.000003343181],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021931535,0.00025226307,0.020514596,0.0083393175,0.0027506766,0.000010701003,0.028646601,0.000005407532,0.00022237503,0.70355624,0.17126384,0.06441607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020359503,0.00007183927,0.018887788,0.04970802,0.0003356536,0.000013613759,0.008053642,0.000005568471,0.0005810853,0.006190039,0.91572523,0.00022390591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019244386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026006596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7444614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009666427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009202291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020539","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.047","title":"5 February 1749. <i>Thomas Cannon and Hannah Simpson</i> v. <i>John Cleland</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.019748472104742065,"score_gpt":0.2966724527635549,"score_spread":0.27692398065881285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007217922,0.01870339,0.000006386528,0.006861944,0.0014746884,0.00059173146,0.00008651939,0.0008900065,0.9713132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002843065,0.004889754,0.00029966226,0.00089055946,0.0020703715,0.000049323637,0.00001671714,0.00027936825,0.98866117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978472,0.00014661437,0.00023092894,0.0006226628,0.0005635295,0.000589072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993049,0.00007365423,0.00011509832,0.00019699169,0.000048908943,0.00026045914],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031654534,0.0004088148,0.00050211005,0.00009226927,0.0004103911,0.0002724798,0.00027873457,0.00055940193,0.0022818977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009607342,0.00029735372,0.00014515841,0.00027685426,0.0006371486,0.00009370019,0.00023574338,0.0003803701,0.0011932958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031324128,0.00001537051,0.00023145306,0.00010467991,0.00012663798,0.000025927235,0.005922053,5.4599504e-8,0.0000045596576,0.0051692114,0.98691446,0.0014824419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001580128,0.00002236919,0.000302423,0.00019091186,0.00009663649,0.000001222661,0.00346905,0.000001528642,0.000004122869,0.00039351906,0.99490273,0.00045750063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21490264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15821412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05668852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016128858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010208362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020586","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.036","title":"18 July 1740. Cleland to William Frederick Boscawen, Richard Wood, and Feilder Freeman","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Art history; Environmental ethics; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028945378234910866,"score_gpt":0.32000438654963637,"score_spread":0.2910590083147255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018864384,0.008646683,0.000024531106,0.0053175185,0.0012803976,0.0008799479,0.000069326066,0.00065009715,0.9829429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020884867,0.0017525832,0.0013228423,0.00084539317,0.0017999234,0.000075349904,0.00000804765,0.00024482067,0.99186254],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772453,0.000103508195,0.00024503507,0.00071312196,0.00061296445,0.00060085766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999195,0.00006836682,0.00010133044,0.00022633962,0.00006330316,0.00034567004],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025009754,0.00042371912,0.0005434017,0.00011739577,0.0004182586,0.00037163534,0.00033733904,0.0004654999,0.0065270597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001621808,0.0003070795,0.00013669189,0.0003628779,0.0003797276,0.00008582008,0.00029454066,0.0003114986,0.005212016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002559248,0.000017276845,0.0002466041,0.00007312397,0.00017778891,0.000009162106,0.008645002,9.755964e-8,0.0000059664185,0.00070126454,0.98902375,0.0010974074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014802816,0.000033446908,0.00064783054,0.00018109946,0.00008524546,6.1540504e-7,0.0031787716,4.3740513e-7,0.0000028155719,0.00027060174,0.9949554,0.0004957154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031731952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04243031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010698357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016141181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004497927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020619","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.125","title":"26 May 1772. Cleland to David Garrick","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Art history; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.03360520006053416,"score_gpt":0.3501402866678603,"score_spread":0.3165350866073261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002437662,0.0020613514,0.000009159841,0.010403945,0.0014869032,0.0005247555,0.000025855254,0.00095796224,0.9845057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011630487,0.0003980056,0.0006763313,0.00062749255,0.0019209142,0.000043500608,0.000003107378,0.0002448504,0.99492276],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984552,0.00007584143,0.00014758334,0.00041455336,0.00049148,0.00041532316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950504,0.000042235042,0.00005010566,0.00016083242,0.000037406444,0.00020440514],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002064518,0.00023797662,0.0003072829,0.000075443655,0.00020894223,0.00017492964,0.00032298343,0.00031079355,0.018444529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013239417,0.00016279859,0.00012484746,0.00027826213,0.00018182796,0.00003467209,0.00016590634,0.00019940033,0.025461618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011290173,0.00000840024,0.00012345298,0.000030753203,0.000077250974,0.000007815536,0.0088646505,7.951896e-8,0.0000016885748,0.006085528,0.98375726,0.0010420239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005147979,0.000012986253,0.00012848075,0.00010932857,0.00003754115,1.6489939e-7,0.004106027,1.6532562e-7,0.0000017223484,0.00016177983,0.99510926,0.000281042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051240064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06164512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011352054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018834532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004442115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98245275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020728","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.122","title":"22 May 1772. Cleland to David Garrick","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Art history","score_opus":0.031712900535081426,"score_gpt":0.3497209934884181,"score_spread":0.3180080929533367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000026509308,0.0020661447,0.000009701241,0.008108684,0.0014852304,0.00052483316,0.000034203815,0.000619811,0.98712486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001149148,0.0004019262,0.0006558839,0.000615779,0.0018780009,0.000044973953,0.0000052404325,0.00018016268,0.9950689],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984515,0.00007718248,0.00014664272,0.00041372023,0.0004984707,0.0004125082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995077,0.000042034444,0.0000501698,0.00016092548,0.000036903086,0.00020225253],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020858653,0.00023630676,0.00030505078,0.00007641553,0.00021002218,0.0001722645,0.00032544887,0.00030278045,0.028941385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013018759,0.00016230781,0.00012455786,0.00028073005,0.00017959374,0.00003446761,0.00017124171,0.00020046878,0.018924037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011407047,0.000008473295,0.00012283577,0.000030099585,0.000076893055,0.000007864364,0.007684752,8.145194e-8,0.0000016185851,0.0065029142,0.98437464,0.0011886737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051717783,0.00001305017,0.00013509722,0.00010310808,0.00003724554,1.6686033e-7,0.004143497,1.640011e-7,0.0000015757737,0.00016573875,0.9950686,0.0002799997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05147315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04539344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010693986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019365648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044264565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98183984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020754","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.060","title":"27 November 1750. Letter from the Duke of Newcastle to the Attorney General Urging Prosecution of Various Individuals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03771595521746443,"score_gpt":0.3165811328130732,"score_spread":0.2788651775956088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063774344,0.002773317,0.000080956925,0.04124994,0.0022478963,0.0016160778,0.00039430743,0.00014767064,0.9451124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048570186,0.00011132602,0.0009734962,0.002770991,0.0036601878,0.00006236517,0.000024218767,0.0001324694,0.9436948],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824333,0.00019919878,0.00028572386,0.00030323616,0.00067917735,0.00028935005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925095,0.00014326276,0.00021836949,0.0002643085,0.00007261009,0.000050485552],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046281086,0.00021687412,0.00034447142,0.000036332625,0.00019323199,0.000086668304,0.0005150849,0.00021915203,0.0032183519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014599826,0.00010284101,0.00016816576,0.00027633255,0.00035439548,0.000042240168,0.00027562768,0.00023400178,0.0004113565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023948517,0.000016011052,0.0010208986,0.00001743511,0.00024731565,7.238786e-7,0.034433894,0.0000046714304,0.00010184422,0.0050258846,0.95870453,0.00042442628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008135666,0.000013882302,0.0015350087,0.00012272432,0.00010340005,1.1473922e-7,0.003131404,0.0000028569088,0.00005758896,0.00015293848,0.9946453,0.00015344362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16638856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05251033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11387823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010950246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006169057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020792","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.097","title":"[September 1762]. Undated Letter from Frances Mayne to Thomas Pichon","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.028603941280840334,"score_gpt":0.3283766305792313,"score_spread":0.29977268929839096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015132193,0.0033632636,0.00003577863,0.01325623,0.0030953162,0.0006153055,0.00012047957,0.0009165452,0.97844577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008339304,0.00023619401,0.00191948,0.0034978325,0.00441649,0.00006682376,0.000033458688,0.00020928046,0.9887865],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781495,0.000110989604,0.00023790222,0.0006646277,0.0006658361,0.0005056807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993435,0.00008591729,0.00009104014,0.00024434322,0.000051134655,0.00018406594],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001634375,0.00037493053,0.0004807395,0.000085074935,0.00024469412,0.00024726198,0.00044092006,0.0004715492,0.04934109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008176096,0.00026157283,0.0001705668,0.00036975098,0.0002905592,0.000078165045,0.00018651511,0.0003038375,0.031151487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029118362,0.000013604392,0.00012248682,0.000020309973,0.00021537117,0.000012323405,0.005527318,1.762711e-7,0.000034224184,0.0012321613,0.9919295,0.00088962284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009408288,0.000010255906,0.00016337543,0.0002025736,0.00006771672,4.9751662e-8,0.0018834358,3.2069786e-7,0.000020513606,0.0004273679,0.99670154,0.0004287524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10765708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11413255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018189605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017131126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036648704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020801","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.041","title":"1 January 1742. Extract of a Letter from Alexander Pope to Hugh Bethel","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ancient history; History; Theology; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.04049260145206411,"score_gpt":0.33776340407114713,"score_spread":0.297270802619083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031783452,0.004300899,0.000034699802,0.012317769,0.001010158,0.0005811277,0.00016221243,0.00025841722,0.9810169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023094045,0.00028131634,0.001972759,0.0022492316,0.0022377803,0.00003642853,0.00001475729,0.00015946667,0.99073887],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822533,0.000111991474,0.00025252346,0.0004543612,0.0005974718,0.00035830983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993732,0.00011642556,0.00010989729,0.00021972065,0.000049762984,0.00013100788],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019399481,0.00027982678,0.00047479552,0.00008288972,0.000109900946,0.000077471406,0.00038474688,0.00038543626,0.028000576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010398567,0.0001949846,0.00020583747,0.00020781776,0.00025750962,0.00006279427,0.00017296875,0.00025688592,0.0034834917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034426498,0.000023760604,0.00013460596,0.000028751894,0.00022609642,0.000007831288,0.010875631,1.11146356e-7,0.000059871014,0.0007147692,0.9865618,0.0013633509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082060906,0.000013563034,0.00041456084,0.0002217398,0.0000746385,6.2212834e-8,0.0026364676,2.7834292e-7,0.000027631319,0.0003356718,0.9959012,0.00029210214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15038015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045196712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10518343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110475994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043596352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020806","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.056","title":"15 March 1750. Warrant for the Detention of Cleland and Others following Publication of <i>Memoirs of Fanny Hill</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Memoir; Law; History; Art; Art history; Political science; Economics; Financial economics","score_opus":0.031172128481501443,"score_gpt":0.32631126298534663,"score_spread":0.2951391345038452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006323915,0.019302648,0.00080007425,0.011619161,0.001270307,0.0040692603,0.00026579128,0.00015251586,0.9561963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36505127,0.001763536,0.001212496,0.000057831254,0.00025550768,0.00011765736,0.000020017003,0.00012594151,0.63139576],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998978,0.000078478166,0.0002804046,0.00018285058,0.00033296167,0.00014726807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992458,0.00022178574,0.0002705274,0.00011571836,0.00011726131,0.000028873992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008105006,0.00011212008,0.00029253488,0.0000593696,0.000104976985,0.000024235176,0.00017403378,0.00016238398,0.00026781837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027122418,0.0000653704,0.00020074335,0.0001644105,0.00036643603,0.00005335364,0.000048023874,0.00006752277,0.0000044158983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005760883,0.00010276623,0.0037872898,0.0020822163,0.0021440021,3.6294145e-7,0.045246176,0.000001923826,0.0025954307,0.023968432,0.8883522,0.03166156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062286906,0.00007925325,0.0015231611,0.0005131212,0.0004924956,1.5564218e-7,0.03360512,0.000052420957,0.00034455437,0.0010061507,0.9614909,0.00026979498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016896361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007116497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35872734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003657799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032057997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9896502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020810","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.003","title":"26 August 1730. Cleland’s Appointment as Attorney","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03294699689707093,"score_gpt":0.33564740685479943,"score_spread":0.3027004099577285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000022039494,0.004240365,0.000004405522,0.0042015696,0.0018681871,0.0006156279,0.000021568889,0.0014801084,0.98754615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001110185,0.0013997379,0.00028394474,0.0004081669,0.002301524,0.00007052871,0.000008534821,0.00031132076,0.99410605],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981275,0.00010523777,0.00019418997,0.0004764183,0.00063136534,0.00046526134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944615,0.000045495344,0.000095167816,0.00018881807,0.00003864259,0.00018570786],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002453282,0.0003092994,0.00037038332,0.00006565846,0.0002554879,0.00018269807,0.0003244372,0.0004186418,0.0513117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010795779,0.00021280648,0.0002027616,0.00018406943,0.00035545378,0.000046252913,0.00017517079,0.00026865443,0.040369183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016607685,0.000021280828,0.00003940167,0.00004724771,0.00018281913,0.0000138034175,0.0038508717,4.3394753e-8,8.948786e-7,0.03558164,0.95917916,0.0010812016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103808095,0.000022763277,0.000040762774,0.00013828304,0.00007097081,3.9714175e-7,0.005721202,2.8861152e-7,0.000002580829,0.0006342767,0.99293864,0.00032602996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09185085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034487683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05736316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037850064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009631318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9831304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020912","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.090","title":"6 March 1758. Cleland to Lucy Cleland ()","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.033383232931334744,"score_gpt":0.356475338468462,"score_spread":0.3230921055371273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000067345354,0.0022294314,0.000012583886,0.010196493,0.0012320618,0.0006627898,0.0000533817,0.0005678094,0.9849781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001280043,0.00064395077,0.00064067857,0.00043639966,0.0021233885,0.00005271496,0.000009002338,0.0001981207,0.9946157],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827254,0.00009434927,0.0001614731,0.00044616725,0.0005482623,0.00047719665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994633,0.00005899783,0.00004619704,0.00017153138,0.000040475355,0.00021950838],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027342036,0.00024594687,0.0003349531,0.000102853475,0.00023205957,0.00019146316,0.00033632942,0.00034370655,0.012186469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012741814,0.00017166712,0.0001246099,0.00030165096,0.00020439558,0.000035281948,0.00020400841,0.00025307844,0.014329878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002796414,0.000010574716,0.00021882752,0.000045595483,0.00009320596,0.000009834688,0.0052725,7.389436e-8,0.000002325748,0.0049255937,0.98747134,0.0019473197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081839076,0.00001754375,0.00034971806,0.00010383218,0.000036563248,2.3255309e-7,0.0030013078,3.3201323e-7,0.0000012350788,0.00028782838,0.99582857,0.00029099023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05700995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07036844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013358491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017906769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054965938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98871654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020920","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.022","title":"18 February 1736. George Williamson to John Braddyll","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Art; Art history","score_opus":0.03363426519958222,"score_gpt":0.3337589494710615,"score_spread":0.30012468427147926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000042938264,0.003840515,0.000012587543,0.010461173,0.002291733,0.0007764748,0.000059073463,0.0011175178,0.981398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006079926,0.00094555714,0.00096965645,0.0012142666,0.0027807755,0.000064829714,0.000011543982,0.00030513943,0.9931002],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772304,0.00011544187,0.00022176413,0.0006079468,0.0007016245,0.0006301801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992757,0.000063285675,0.00008048046,0.00023811897,0.000052385472,0.00029002197],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028302928,0.00036783906,0.00045388244,0.00012775992,0.00031318635,0.00021169218,0.00047309557,0.00047473083,0.037610445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018944082,0.0002719979,0.00021163932,0.00045052165,0.0002633712,0.000074912314,0.00025883707,0.00031787046,0.02297096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017733098,0.000017607446,0.00009249468,0.00005092822,0.00011557634,0.000013085807,0.005493683,1.0395807e-7,0.0000049401488,0.007368972,0.98506474,0.0017761041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006406668,0.000020005416,0.0003648085,0.00020389124,0.000050324103,2.595063e-7,0.0031955484,3.5269645e-7,0.000005053161,0.00029654274,0.9953598,0.00043935372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17227976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09915391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07312585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033357504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007458945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399021030","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.019","title":"10 February 1736. Order for Cleland to Accompany John Braddyll to Surat","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); History; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.037604817990374614,"score_gpt":0.34662868394330526,"score_spread":0.30902386595293063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399021030","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001248805,0.0010759898,0.00008643698,0.017077116,0.0014011083,0.002155216,0.00014958456,0.00060691754,0.97732276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006221585,0.00007822898,0.0034464838,0.0012673513,0.0022866586,0.0002564436,0.000018793267,0.00025781456,0.9917661],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792486,0.000073379706,0.00024139746,0.00062867405,0.0004928492,0.00063884165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990705,0.00015442011,0.00006486155,0.00021697047,0.00015968032,0.00033353333],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002991735,0.00036280247,0.0005206447,0.00013450491,0.00034494992,0.000295931,0.00047514986,0.00036649455,0.026940826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004080637,0.00026027247,0.00018641363,0.00053900626,0.00012090362,0.000068342975,0.00023347455,0.00016762853,0.01787024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015858937,0.000019227089,0.000043539898,0.000060341565,0.00013230433,0.0000025498096,0.00458049,8.5281073e-7,0.00000447569,0.0015902447,0.9912374,0.0023127417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014020108,0.00005748467,0.00037194902,0.00012635201,0.000052370422,1.789342e-7,0.0029250395,0.000001098132,0.000004155222,0.00011791372,0.9957454,0.00045782994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0587968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16215278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10335598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023397384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000957373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399021033","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.026","title":"2 March 1736. Extract of a Letter from William Henry Draper to the Court of Directors","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Art history; Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.026612467766830992,"score_gpt":0.3185015255740767,"score_spread":0.29188905780724567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399021033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012822698,0.0043001464,0.0000135757855,0.019914037,0.0012965415,0.0007488284,0.0002270975,0.00013166842,0.97208583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029136276,0.0005256609,0.00061598426,0.00084881345,0.0016049361,0.000030322326,0.0000074621717,0.00013530494,0.96709526],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982478,0.00015951342,0.00026810923,0.0003191728,0.0007264836,0.00027892587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922764,0.00025132977,0.00013907737,0.00024279024,0.000067814326,0.00007134385],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000302007,0.00022124963,0.00044938503,0.00006114491,0.00010410872,0.000039451483,0.00047952423,0.00023474725,0.010394167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001332872,0.00011908736,0.00022642776,0.0002571016,0.00048037316,0.000035437144,0.0001606835,0.00022664598,0.0005721987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041539397,0.000023622355,0.00039155863,0.00003539007,0.00026400338,0.000001725776,0.014074013,2.7605776e-7,0.0001211627,0.00023750858,0.98354495,0.0013016529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004785628,0.000012872065,0.00215299,0.00019199215,0.00007374802,3.2216573e-8,0.0026485974,4.0156633e-7,0.00004550914,0.000064135515,0.994593,0.00016883202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.117948584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052124757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06582383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008763789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045540244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99051046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399036155","doi":"10.29173/mlj734","title":"The Manitoba Court of Appeal, 2000-2004: Caseload, Output and Citations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.03706069869124262,"score_gpt":0.29341855927945304,"score_spread":0.2563578605882104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399036155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8997925,0.008542616,0.00010641898,0.038744602,0.0011690194,0.00055519346,0.000029682196,0.00007853374,0.05098146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959231,0.0013470862,0.0006239574,0.00026475606,0.0013813233,0.0000077094055,8.506252e-7,0.000010229769,0.00044096052],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831367,0.00022552631,0.00035812505,0.00013194096,0.00056188065,0.00040888955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988254,0.00030861862,0.00023362444,0.00010175495,0.00035735514,0.00017326993],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090628606,0.00013458241,0.00018341116,0.000027363365,0.005135957,0.0003262292,0.00028746124,0.00007634042,0.00003993221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002225732,0.00008907709,0.000086526496,0.0001494761,0.00088752224,0.00033132706,0.000061029947,0.0003118769,0.00004310736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013325416,0.00044524288,0.033505823,0.000055142464,0.00084365107,0.000110566,0.10942749,0.00031449212,0.00026197344,0.17435072,0.17419383,0.5063578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043512933,0.00004875899,0.016017357,0.00003504952,0.00006146551,0.00005229857,0.21807934,0.00002841923,0.000037981383,0.0018019002,0.76321703,0.0001852883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049690284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7282609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67857057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033952162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008828956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399040300","doi":"10.29173/mlj744","title":"Try, Try Again: Appeals from the Manitoba Court of Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada 2000-2004","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Remand (court procedure)","score_opus":0.021468740787804995,"score_gpt":0.2508587548802448,"score_spread":0.22939001409243978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399040300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9206886,0.0021223384,0.00006156787,0.048213024,0.0017623967,0.00076260086,0.00022750892,0.00003192529,0.026129995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99553514,0.00008891468,0.00014092166,0.00095256296,0.002978475,0.00001141198,0.000006105428,0.000019827787,0.00026663975],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961808,0.0005258153,0.00072813564,0.00023225146,0.0016374716,0.0006955654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808,0.0004671202,0.0005010471,0.00027478268,0.00048035826,0.00019665666],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013376292,0.0002575637,0.00045075247,0.000021743364,0.0027088113,0.00017399386,0.0011607606,0.00011877559,0.00015824726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019011286,0.0001479738,0.00020894375,0.00027557052,0.00062087405,0.00016291981,0.0001484865,0.0005083099,0.000016950986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020591116,0.00031470493,0.05433808,0.000040357034,0.00069569255,0.00011237894,0.024527144,0.0020685154,0.0008080461,0.0152666485,0.894872,0.0067505348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009171684,0.00010055611,0.14997874,0.00018932985,0.0001772088,0.000023569557,0.27505523,0.000029036031,0.000777937,0.002714243,0.56956476,0.0004722334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9883135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99924904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32530725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009428165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056065817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399060758","doi":"10.29173/mlj1050","title":"Employment Standards that Work for Women","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Gender equality; Political science; Public administration; Not for profit; Government (linguistics); Voluntary association; Equal employment opportunity; Work (physics); Public relations; Law; Sociology; Gender studies; Commission; Engineering","score_opus":0.06720477419209601,"score_gpt":0.3223767747043042,"score_spread":0.2551720005122082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399060758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9600003,0.00071247626,0.00020781861,0.0038170167,0.0014366357,0.00047610298,0.000023872502,0.00009454707,0.033231247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955554,0.0005324286,0.0006558363,0.00037385104,0.0014764623,0.000051065217,7.3077916e-7,0.000014113567,0.0013401327],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979858,0.00012457061,0.00020318247,0.00014392853,0.0009235484,0.0006189657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991098,0.00011586426,0.00012815808,0.0000765244,0.00032167562,0.0002479623],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010359782,0.0001326741,0.00021234098,0.000020633908,0.0051942454,0.00019037772,0.00026786933,0.00007417729,0.00026603986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015293638,0.00010048655,0.00013630255,0.000112712376,0.00042255194,0.00027015546,0.00005105663,0.00020942873,0.000023357357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071235374,0.0004988921,0.1406603,0.00005239911,0.00096274103,0.00030269794,0.39302272,0.000066515924,0.00004787536,0.04354988,0.2665566,0.15356705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053922826,0.00006448286,0.01823448,0.000024910418,0.000011185909,0.000013474698,0.09293482,3.2970067e-7,0.00004175016,0.002011112,0.8859479,0.00017636636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069476143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039314102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61939126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016168631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000985013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399060776","doi":"10.29173/mlj1056","title":"Response to Consutation Paper on Franchise Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Franchise; Legislation; State (computer science); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Marketing; Computer science","score_opus":0.027645803910842974,"score_gpt":0.31189943137143306,"score_spread":0.2842536274605901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399060776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83316255,0.00013504492,0.00002253722,0.05917454,0.0007528347,0.0002868719,0.0000040883137,0.000083860614,0.106377706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844515,0.00003123232,0.00046174982,0.014058763,0.0007328595,0.0000044136236,5.071451e-7,0.0000068271456,0.00025218795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981896,0.00048285202,0.00022274382,0.00015332994,0.0005892987,0.00036216836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916434,0.00021605885,0.000088733046,0.00008772789,0.00018970303,0.0002534282],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010001714,0.00012707777,0.00015787646,0.00003044446,0.0029613837,0.00030444388,0.00020435768,0.00007954398,0.000240313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035955608,0.00009908788,0.00009105648,0.00014501066,0.00019333103,0.00033757437,0.000017441042,0.00028941975,0.00042425893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024067527,0.00039913203,0.0010550597,0.0000053149975,0.000112649126,0.0003447367,0.08095924,0.00026831683,0.003867427,0.79360163,0.035185356,0.08179436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000700893,0.00042185702,0.054382596,0.0000592319,0.000021555456,0.000015698748,0.040461767,0.0000016673738,0.00019918408,0.009709144,0.89373267,0.00029370844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014150018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11549609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85854733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036563823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028648617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399060778","doi":"10.29173/mlj750","title":"A Judicial Loudmouth with a Quite Legacy: A Review of Emett Hall: Establishment Radical","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Legislature; Suspect; Political science; Economic Justice; Portrait; Sociology; History; Art history","score_opus":0.07047549840749247,"score_gpt":0.35105315399381504,"score_spread":0.2805776555863226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399060778","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010135703,0.9773695,0.000009280412,0.0009005032,0.0006577579,0.0014596314,0.000028394777,0.00005571424,0.019509112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00006201621,0.99605477,0.0005780637,0.00045836644,0.0026014477,0.000076590026,0.000013543021,0.00005795166,0.00009722783],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99344194,0.0013634394,0.0015417224,0.00047594032,0.0022851466,0.00089181453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99650574,0.0003041498,0.0018001825,0.00030341453,0.00060124806,0.00048525387],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014860698,0.0006685208,0.0032047252,0.00011470083,0.0023155105,0.0003372036,0.0010665315,0.00035568824,0.00029496124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055364857,0.000418403,0.0011837049,0.00077050395,0.001659937,0.00053660496,0.00021137144,0.001509982,0.00006833264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027443588,0.00028203297,0.000015641992,0.031079922,0.0012934471,0.0006466957,0.004342695,2.3931926e-7,4.666344e-8,0.009008771,0.030029163,0.9232739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030098466,0.00012732347,0.000004952975,0.09274328,0.0011655272,0.00042489165,0.00415228,5.340622e-8,9.431192e-8,0.000053260224,0.9005661,0.00046127342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04931909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.095688075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92281264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009901844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399069657","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102517","title":"Patient and Family Experiences of Adverse Events in Pregnancy in Canada from a Multicultural Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Multiculturalism; Pregnancy; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine; Gender studies; Pedagogy; Art","score_opus":0.013560285059921854,"score_gpt":0.25469136028452277,"score_spread":0.24113107522460092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399069657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9664392,0.029067732,1.669046e-7,0.00033113742,0.0037493538,0.00013196813,0.000014010821,0.0000011153792,0.00026534146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99908,0.0007710268,0.000066347005,0.000043259657,0.000010912518,0.000005843011,3.3104524e-7,0.0000026339314,0.000019633053],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882776,0.00011584379,0.00036258102,0.0001343379,0.00035458227,0.00020488234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981994,0.0013283264,0.00016119952,0.00002821591,0.00017951826,0.00010332084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009834178,0.000092234346,0.00027370866,0.00008135813,0.000094195195,0.0000055807614,0.00009100119,0.00005421191,0.000030376668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018507491,0.00006743928,0.000025500402,0.00034919882,0.00011272445,0.00014733388,0.00004106826,0.00020299687,3.823967e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006177426,0.000049615144,0.49942195,0.00002983796,0.00011035937,0.0016175719,0.47958606,0.000096053554,0.000014657246,0.00023373148,0.00022346772,0.01861052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003124335,0.000038424005,0.52985144,0.0000453186,0.000009139867,6.47464e-7,0.46914026,0.000043854692,0.000005041073,0.000047518042,0.00044234245,0.00006357487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99745053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03264084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042694146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026932089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399083526","doi":"10.7202/1111264ar","title":"Réformer la dévolution légale des successions au Québec : de l’Office de révision du Code civil au Code civil du Québec, musicalités et rythmes entourant le statut du conjoint survivant dans la famille","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Humanities; Political science; Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.024788664153555223,"score_gpt":0.28029545585213306,"score_spread":0.2555067916985778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399083526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91740584,0.001702317,0.0019273256,0.052207753,0.00085434446,0.0006677866,0.0004766765,0.0004574688,0.024300475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815347,0.009156469,0.00039921878,0.00036775478,0.0010838037,0.00016959588,0.000102201084,0.00010399218,0.0070822686],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928192,0.002420095,0.0009364813,0.00091241294,0.0007811093,0.0021307168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99471563,0.0030840514,0.00047528875,0.0004524618,0.0004437437,0.0008288313],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039624055,0.0005784602,0.00093752035,0.00013621528,0.0035414624,0.00029176156,0.0007756438,0.00061034836,0.00029367456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036090687,0.0006497579,0.00055527186,0.0012337074,0.0027094071,0.0008212468,0.0005541883,0.00083237485,0.00033339066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017890586,0.0011521212,0.3453968,0.00084833184,0.00045035852,0.0006085329,0.5724729,0.0027309852,0.008149339,0.039006177,0.023618963,0.005386644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001840312,0.000186971,0.5869285,0.0015210197,0.00040763704,0.00021335995,0.13520625,0.013033678,0.00083827204,0.0021764382,0.25617644,0.0014711538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9353157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98900235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4372666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009856818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008995204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399415660","doi":"10.1515/9782760644779-016","title":"Droit Des Autochtones Et Droit Autochtone Devant Les Cours Fédérales Du Canada","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.021369177132150124,"score_gpt":0.2216437871096699,"score_spread":0.20027460997751978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399415660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12867905,0.045935247,0.0004891847,0.008537249,0.0010213131,0.0012645883,0.0006889035,0.0004468249,0.8129376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57296175,0.02079392,0.0022459964,0.00060407224,0.00071126653,0.000047474696,0.00014919604,0.00018535218,0.40230095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947489,0.0005116532,0.0006872255,0.0011267018,0.001324123,0.0016014274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963853,0.0009377578,0.0006817704,0.00053058326,0.0006737775,0.00079084915],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043902584,0.0011364928,0.0013014441,0.000109152264,0.004627492,0.0002514166,0.0012615791,0.0010863895,0.0023639405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002763979,0.0012574436,0.00064409495,0.00010169557,0.0029347662,0.00028760647,0.0013313565,0.0011763106,0.000052494488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002985117,0.00014643403,0.007772573,0.0007797735,0.0029882793,0.0066489717,0.04185921,0.0016593813,0.0009957193,0.8165598,0.029632444,0.090658896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092904153,0.00012480574,0.018402347,0.0010727007,0.0013093698,0.00019688577,0.020031074,0.00038818805,0.00057324005,0.0065267584,0.94861484,0.0018307574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9625941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9926821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9189824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008976636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015594361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399444066","doi":"10.1080/02697459.2024.2359790","title":"Human rights and municipal land use bylaws in Atlantic Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Practice and Research","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Human rights; Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Political science; Geography; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.1672113683953822,"score_gpt":0.47543456110765453,"score_spread":0.30822319271227233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399444066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9785012,0.0032340134,1.4464825e-7,0.0069487393,0.00008986495,0.00016450576,0.0000026673033,0.000022055994,0.011036822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957832,0.00027743235,0.000045756435,0.00004267717,0.00013991375,0.000010057543,0.000002774262,0.000004684995,0.0036934942],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981902,0.00054742134,0.000108209235,0.00021791247,0.0005459687,0.0003902909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969886,0.0027387275,0.000016944583,0.000059387457,0.00008283095,0.00011349171],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017917622,0.00006925716,0.000107525484,0.00007136956,0.0015302892,0.00052160496,0.000091126676,0.00006435699,0.000019090701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011510443,0.000049809925,0.0000088708175,0.000269745,0.0002978241,0.0005606936,0.000111814625,0.0005671276,0.000004772755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012781266,0.00012063674,0.46084163,0.00040775735,0.00027738867,0.0042167436,0.43242687,0.000033488082,0.00022206937,0.029199747,0.070600554,0.0015253205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014410994,0.00003158673,0.055431988,0.00020312067,0.000013291279,0.000007926952,0.017576395,0.00011970848,0.0000035971836,0.00022794525,0.9261237,0.000116674855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9891953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9642317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8555231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014344853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012735708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399809261","doi":"10.12677/ojls.2024.126519","title":"The Peculiarities of the National Legal Localization of American Law in the Common Law System—Canada and Australia Were Used as the Comparison Objects","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Journal of Legal Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Common law","score_opus":0.047508846635932,"score_gpt":0.37237958404165916,"score_spread":0.32487073740572714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399809261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93114114,0.00073185936,0.000007881291,0.0284321,0.0008942039,0.0006662204,0.000017028451,0.0000051100346,0.03810443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993823,0.00002887589,0.000018924318,0.00024156949,0.00007995219,0.0000045135685,1.5176352e-7,0.0000026728462,0.00024099727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967244,0.0005784211,0.00046429288,0.00012220095,0.0018830817,0.00022760151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983159,0.0007231269,0.00043190297,0.00010369238,0.0003736939,0.00005173775],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004134668,0.00009365629,0.00023344153,0.000018968203,0.0020840438,0.0010299531,0.0017686511,0.000022471902,0.0000061548276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002878552,0.000037323727,0.000059197708,0.0007657164,0.005124601,0.000825306,0.0002023576,0.00030505005,4.889981e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020243571,0.000022679587,0.005313414,0.000023101828,0.00002696706,0.0000051767124,0.024902647,0.0005722801,0.00019321074,0.9669692,0.0017682166,0.00018286215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006473048,0.0003857681,0.084504806,0.0012225873,0.000122984,0.00010730356,0.5063758,0.0019251624,0.0028519852,0.0035064577,0.39795136,0.00039847838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84759307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9029056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96346277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036497798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094203127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399819432","doi":"10.1515/9782760540675","title":"Labrador","year":2014,"lang":"pt","type":"book","venue":"Presses de l'Université du Québec eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.01603010991369282,"score_gpt":0.2235764004317361,"score_spread":0.20754629051804327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399819432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0165178,0.0038176037,0.00028436305,0.0070056366,0.0009590642,0.0012747525,0.000109132685,0.00059258984,0.969439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16309156,0.00095258025,0.00011466157,0.0007006785,0.0016705988,0.000027171029,0.000030245044,0.00010016567,0.83331233],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956092,0.0006428834,0.0005124089,0.0009964762,0.0009919876,0.0012470217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964677,0.0011317976,0.00068797095,0.0005828176,0.0005118133,0.000617884],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005065611,0.00090848014,0.001103559,0.0001381015,0.0028224688,0.0002847982,0.0019165789,0.00094881543,0.0099495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040018224,0.0008847053,0.00068452244,0.00009995695,0.0017687918,0.00024804502,0.0011084296,0.000969486,0.0042218757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016822499,0.00010674539,0.004025118,0.00058469456,0.0012896688,0.00020944384,0.28436026,0.000032993506,0.00014793423,0.004344419,0.65259933,0.05213115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074456603,0.000115421375,0.0019050858,0.0003185583,0.00073308864,0.0000079780875,0.011391841,0.000055105575,0.00008648683,0.00020821241,0.983388,0.0010456259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28080624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41353297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3307887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030775364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020406998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399819489","doi":"10.1515/9782760540675-002","title":"Labrador","year":2014,"lang":"pt","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses de l'Université du Québec eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.018921320294744536,"score_gpt":0.22081383652685088,"score_spread":0.20189251623210636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399819489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011894483,0.0032622789,0.00037304987,0.0074917423,0.0007423034,0.0010416609,0.000093292605,0.0004901343,0.97461104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39468524,0.0014227903,0.00010352301,0.0005570625,0.001026836,0.000012896584,0.00001405362,0.000092763505,0.6020848],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964478,0.0002609235,0.00048532418,0.00092395477,0.00088125875,0.0010007371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970144,0.0007811873,0.0006319586,0.0005396185,0.00047408306,0.00055872835],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039357785,0.0008777429,0.0009915533,0.00012872297,0.0024498077,0.0002345641,0.0014995235,0.0008461474,0.01764864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025248624,0.0008544808,0.00065880443,0.000044378667,0.0016377658,0.00017073752,0.0009675737,0.0008307126,0.004409633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042836028,0.00012187156,0.006173579,0.00083271385,0.0031425273,0.0005387628,0.46100092,0.000058091577,0.00046938634,0.1244235,0.1823072,0.22050308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006490326,0.00011235191,0.0011683415,0.0002864148,0.0006833076,0.00000872568,0.007487483,0.000040225263,0.000095543015,0.00039039168,0.98804957,0.0010286433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26817673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3203138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8057423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014775143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064550847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399821061","doi":"10.1515/9782760524637-006","title":"Le Droit à La Parentalité Au Québec","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses de l'Université du Québec eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.01575203393165197,"score_gpt":0.21601567223749202,"score_spread":0.20026363830584004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399821061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05579198,0.0041959723,0.0000584263,0.009207182,0.00031023548,0.0006438391,0.00008108602,0.00031871378,0.9293926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7048424,0.00090874796,0.00012962577,0.00035658237,0.0006228113,0.000011215972,0.000018199222,0.000064074564,0.29304639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99651396,0.00033259843,0.0005139675,0.0008621536,0.0007514623,0.001025867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99734056,0.0008152801,0.0005381907,0.0004492169,0.00029575417,0.0005610163],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033648688,0.0008325093,0.0009105334,0.000102800026,0.0029570172,0.00016993517,0.0012749113,0.0008007903,0.0036820846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000158321,0.00090566365,0.00071665656,0.000056010933,0.0031762456,0.00032481717,0.0006131121,0.00079921714,0.0011964447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021252483,0.00024426338,0.02355891,0.00029976378,0.0015825455,0.00067972514,0.23483586,0.00007702622,0.00018695848,0.47546777,0.008304637,0.25455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071564276,0.00011388625,0.009054164,0.0003251154,0.00060260366,0.00002776116,0.011025983,0.000015261365,0.00010127305,0.0018265634,0.9751529,0.0010388474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9780009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9802566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96684825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049082236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050234376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399841707","doi":"10.1515/9782763715315-007","title":"La reconnaissance de l’adoption coutumière au Québec : quelle place pour la <i>Charte des droits et libertés de la personne ?</i>","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.031630045432253936,"score_gpt":0.2918075767958746,"score_spread":0.26017753136362065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399841707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11359506,0.0036550553,0.00028202301,0.016271703,0.00029747898,0.0006198842,0.00004069893,0.00027165705,0.86496645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48015395,0.004488673,0.0026068075,0.0005709868,0.0005112994,0.00007506947,0.000008131459,0.00007691006,0.51150817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532026,0.0015925543,0.0005602664,0.00080465805,0.00058821484,0.0011340337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950565,0.0033624724,0.0004447661,0.00026969452,0.00033427053,0.0005322719],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002454007,0.00082476274,0.000814972,0.000058282945,0.0019725363,0.0003514086,0.0005839444,0.0013841047,0.0036117595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065471884,0.00072759326,0.00047201457,0.000115873154,0.0043631797,0.00068195123,0.00022402678,0.0012682427,0.0016000815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004513973,0.00014684554,0.0057681925,0.00027767816,0.00038467487,0.000067111476,0.15110856,0.00006731677,0.00034577821,0.8003741,0.019785952,0.021628648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000785158,0.0000863563,0.0079755215,0.0010326579,0.00025470357,0.00008703525,0.024770075,0.00031924262,0.0000655504,0.009228931,0.9540799,0.0013148512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4834356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41408616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.934294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034697629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012650873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399843344","doi":"10.1515/9782763715407-004","title":"The Ethos of Canadian Aboriginal Law and the Potential Relevance of Federal Loyalty in a Reconfigured Relationship between Aboriginal and Non-Aboriginal Governments: A Thought Experiment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Loyalty; Relevance (law); Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.021631672330855216,"score_gpt":0.3090466728070566,"score_spread":0.2874150004762014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399843344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07918035,0.0040132618,0.000015767004,0.008705997,0.00045911613,0.0023013211,0.00018342932,0.000023934814,0.9051168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8669969,0.005793784,0.0007473889,0.00013651513,0.0004323801,0.00009631973,0.000010331842,0.000028505208,0.12575787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973341,0.00023619806,0.0006860557,0.00041383225,0.0008351144,0.0004946888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976934,0.0010470707,0.0005271246,0.00024387494,0.00026086956,0.00022761476],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011154306,0.00036298446,0.0006547222,0.00008132275,0.0013770423,0.00018157181,0.0003719851,0.00036079113,0.0001385271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001047511,0.00021657151,0.00012602584,0.00012959275,0.0028729646,0.00024567428,0.00003538852,0.0006108006,0.000008255742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010687551,0.000009479179,0.007539934,0.00003574644,0.00013299557,0.000003992111,0.013193833,0.0000011556034,0.000008625748,0.9772725,0.0010989743,0.0005958913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018900903,0.00011253449,0.04295414,0.00030295417,0.00014472503,0.0000019018963,0.007429509,0.000013007429,0.000044498145,0.011981057,0.93462974,0.00049585913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6945605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57771844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96529144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005789958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005672086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400074267","doi":"10.1515/9781773855714-073","title":"8.2 The Durability of Terra Nullius: Tsilhqot’in v. British Columbia","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Durability; Materials science; Composite material","score_opus":0.022846628090494245,"score_gpt":0.22727782034271493,"score_spread":0.20443119225222067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400074267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00300435,0.001817014,0.0000026392856,0.00009343607,0.00021896155,0.0006221444,0.00007870142,0.00005383456,0.9941089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020346936,0.0014938745,0.000060931776,0.000008311983,0.00005444828,8.296199e-7,0.0000048718293,0.000014997551,0.9780148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846697,0.00010235298,0.0002867806,0.00034441656,0.0005304585,0.00026901325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989418,0.0002752378,0.00023722525,0.00024725214,0.00021314372,0.00008538291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004154255,0.00014594808,0.00044875094,0.000022878166,0.00065000117,0.000098170116,0.0006205621,0.00034590645,0.00023220928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000622001,0.00018960318,0.0002972,0.000014607864,0.0026107535,0.00006677072,0.0003597618,0.00041513547,0.000006247428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016035713,0.00010111826,0.0013096236,0.0010568023,0.0010865496,0.00041978195,0.06826362,0.000004557954,0.000032095766,0.8099208,0.02175664,0.095888086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002537932,0.000032045624,0.0019811234,0.0004818207,0.00012872326,9.2418895e-7,0.0027064183,0.000009392209,0.0000033705987,0.0065084253,0.9876497,0.00024425687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5117334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80148304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9658931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027642728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012678314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96194303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400314019","doi":"10.7202/1111656ar","title":"Observations concernant l’application de l’article 1460 du Code civil du Québec et la responsabilité du gardien non titulaire de l’autorité parentale","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013956287667254019,"score_gpt":0.24835959753690598,"score_spread":0.23440330986965197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400314019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9123808,0.0055972086,0.0016339358,0.043499928,0.00035947183,0.00055152236,0.00012117141,0.0002996381,0.035556287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96616423,0.004099945,0.0006375829,0.00034339915,0.000678101,0.000048495418,0.000020817788,0.000045745146,0.027961707],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973877,0.00055900624,0.000334055,0.0005666835,0.00031102847,0.0008414979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811107,0.0008817353,0.00013151419,0.00029907722,0.0001712562,0.0004053659],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012717898,0.0002985216,0.0003540645,0.00005404485,0.00125224,0.00014509629,0.0005097621,0.0003659287,0.00029836505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040437334,0.00035021192,0.00031352896,0.0005846436,0.0007636661,0.0004963147,0.00025953955,0.00042297915,0.0001905447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017622903,0.00041579048,0.4806776,0.0007200247,0.00044165432,0.0006522594,0.14862402,0.0024728307,0.012516741,0.3225479,0.016954578,0.013800376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005310511,0.00006846437,0.18106197,0.00046161597,0.00031533447,0.00009279797,0.009516815,0.022033386,0.0007186106,0.0010227334,0.7837512,0.00042604006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.122472845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3401316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7667966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013756234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011670247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400314327","doi":"10.7202/1111681ar","title":"L’invisibilité persistante des parents de même sexe en droit familial québécois","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017611992315633616,"score_gpt":0.24383469373824862,"score_spread":0.226222701422615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400314327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94845045,0.0047304872,0.00012962727,0.0034778342,0.0006825031,0.00051347056,0.00015480525,0.00035206057,0.04150874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7913882,0.010441462,0.000564868,0.00022937845,0.00081859715,0.000013284772,0.000030902,0.00006453662,0.19644876],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568474,0.00056246266,0.00041381796,0.00081995485,0.0005691295,0.0019499112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979266,0.0005400865,0.00019425753,0.00039899087,0.000198265,0.0007418155],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010804589,0.00047542708,0.00062816276,0.00015326627,0.0021506904,0.00011081872,0.000954317,0.00064054906,0.0005202099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004892544,0.00060954527,0.000610632,0.0013538521,0.0013001831,0.00047890932,0.00052706915,0.00058281585,0.00084970857],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035695397,0.00042177603,0.27347657,0.0017756206,0.0012345302,0.0022243818,0.5781031,0.001986929,0.0070095225,0.098708004,0.008432322,0.026270285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002279915,0.00033922825,0.27695563,0.0013676209,0.0009634499,0.00009384468,0.22332625,0.004089233,0.00077109004,0.013051265,0.47495827,0.0018041994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12707226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15477796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46652594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020051358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004332257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401019447","doi":"10.29173/alr2776","title":"Unsettling the Royal Proclamation of 1763: A Substantive Analysis of Section 25 of the Charter","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proclamation; Charter; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Section (typography); Bill of rights; Human rights; Legislative history; Sociology","score_opus":0.024977973868769706,"score_gpt":0.31865952613543785,"score_spread":0.29368155226666814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401019447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7261365,0.18035471,0.000050462084,0.026461557,0.0009346225,0.0033468483,0.00004471402,0.000045405806,0.0626252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99458146,0.0045802468,0.000007524501,0.000115333154,0.000045660978,0.00002472568,0.000003085445,0.0000034618054,0.0006385195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988609,0.0002898897,0.00033353822,0.00011606485,0.00030192337,0.000097659366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989985,0.00045273764,0.00022006407,0.0001367947,0.00017894876,0.000012916488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000630665,0.000072082665,0.00031761607,0.00001643618,0.00020073495,0.000014529262,0.00017146052,0.000037107886,0.00007956009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002942529,0.000033750093,0.00032350933,0.0011296809,0.000304279,0.00008455648,0.000030241805,0.00007737653,0.0000029880591],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001701678,0.0001440953,0.016608462,0.01040568,0.0068537705,5.4392086e-7,0.21103796,0.0002065194,0.000679613,0.73506093,0.0036169237,0.015368503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029861514,0.000110984234,0.08084397,0.019772453,0.018906923,6.895234e-7,0.008966898,0.0033009208,0.0019847876,0.0007207474,0.86449045,0.0006025748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03628939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06581601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8608735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043399963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026944455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97012806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401019576","doi":"10.29173/alr2783","title":"Beyond Charter Applicability: Exploring Challenges and Opportunities for Indigenous Jurisdiction in McCarthy v. Whitefish Lake First Nation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Indigenous; Jurisdiction; Doctrine; Context (archaeology); Law; Constitution; Political science; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16413033029585053,"score_gpt":0.3194346708031673,"score_spread":0.15530434050731676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401019576","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052850887,0.7746136,0.0000066678645,0.11442751,0.00076192676,0.0038556345,0.000030346315,0.0001761037,0.053277325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2530755,0.7433853,0.00003204134,0.0007620639,0.00030463713,0.0017686208,0.000023595183,0.000017007556,0.0006312374],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988016,0.000107117914,0.0002867599,0.00032358943,0.00020469933,0.00027626587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991752,0.00052044383,0.000051449373,0.00010769721,0.00007144641,0.0000737488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007986657,0.00014778528,0.00031196402,0.000030541996,0.0004803298,0.00009051494,0.00009550904,0.00007564242,0.000039501527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013398526,0.00012320974,0.000085649895,0.00011391629,0.00017307623,0.0005683367,0.00004047308,0.00010636645,0.000013501352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005803156,0.00006120017,0.00026434637,0.008565779,0.000092420596,0.000005254074,0.14813158,3.5260618e-7,0.0000019345393,0.32074386,0.0007388311,0.52138865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007681948,0.00002852249,0.0005324179,0.0014709843,0.000053263244,0.0000011328434,0.0023865355,0.0000045632128,0.0000018754171,0.0013654338,0.9939228,0.0001556362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005114664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34901023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.993184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108675085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028990416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7731876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401446120","doi":"10.1515/9782763742014-007","title":"Refonder le « mariage de raison » canadien sur de nouvelles assises","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.05128251277394161,"score_gpt":0.28706866382906043,"score_spread":0.23578615105511883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401446120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038824853,0.0017971589,0.000098420416,0.015735384,0.0010980447,0.0005318967,0.00008081839,0.000161968,0.94167143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21689579,0.0014927664,0.0029362976,0.0010353127,0.0015692404,0.000026701891,0.000015444244,0.000063280946,0.77596515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99651736,0.000272068,0.00051392615,0.00071897724,0.0006364866,0.0013411815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977927,0.00056545023,0.0003267248,0.0003139439,0.00041217727,0.0005889734],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008682369,0.0006468347,0.0007479035,0.00006385596,0.0022929008,0.00017229747,0.0006970464,0.0009903023,0.013951468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004954821,0.00053545815,0.00040474418,0.00010519019,0.0026167938,0.00029565836,0.00031852003,0.00050942105,0.00083659135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003476776,0.000097964046,0.0050189593,0.000114356415,0.00085740717,0.000105427294,0.07473739,0.000008098839,0.00013350874,0.8171432,0.09214741,0.009601502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033310326,0.00009049648,0.0063266344,0.00015455834,0.000186093,0.0000072507646,0.020658446,0.00003710092,0.00010655123,0.005293905,0.9659212,0.00088463514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6937621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8045826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8737738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002781622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001534102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401446789","doi":"10.3138/9781487553920-014","title":"10 Internal and External Advocacy for Legal Reform: The Genesis of the 1986 Ontario Family Law Act, 1967–1986","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03829873180557894,"score_gpt":0.24699866610000634,"score_spread":0.2086999342944274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401446789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004435005,0.0009010597,0.000009106767,0.00014479928,0.00032443315,0.00074156024,0.00008797515,0.000033882912,0.9933222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013728185,0.0003868997,0.00013089484,0.000034660632,0.00015694037,0.0000016877037,0.000002493162,0.000018177616,0.98554003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986616,0.000065356435,0.00021396972,0.00028854393,0.0005120946,0.00025845793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882746,0.00015219016,0.00041352367,0.00027386256,0.0002527886,0.00008020037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026414797,0.00023987648,0.00039522658,0.000009639674,0.0010085134,0.000043204083,0.00095144176,0.00023573852,0.00018757352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019643207,0.00016391244,0.00036667095,0.0000019476613,0.0014495321,0.00016382395,0.00066657254,0.00020749158,0.00000316432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081404205,0.000032467422,0.00013833465,0.00018618032,0.0011978804,0.000014126476,0.2892561,0.0000041616154,0.0001826958,0.6886418,0.00692766,0.01260455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043459111,0.00007398663,0.0025139628,0.00021411137,0.00027021195,6.0464913e-7,0.0053807246,0.0000029814166,0.000035981782,0.00044367,0.9904217,0.00020744897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95189935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98349404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009998633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020939406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77567714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401446973","doi":"10.3138/9781487553920","title":"Essays in the History of Canadian Law, Volume XII","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Law; History; Political science; Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.04160662951370592,"score_gpt":0.23001639828648485,"score_spread":0.18840976877277893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401446973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000024915102,0.0020740298,3.1593052e-7,0.00017298014,0.00045377685,0.00037915242,0.000093078816,0.000028113722,0.99677366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011881273,0.0007209857,0.000028608027,0.000037648595,0.00008579023,0.0000010810817,0.000009641504,0.000010305295,0.99791783],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870443,0.00021104567,0.00014659078,0.00020591878,0.00044314357,0.0002888711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991802,0.0001330954,0.00020673306,0.00022164748,0.00015307986,0.000105217354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003782182,0.00014818923,0.0003420537,0.000045098495,0.00030295324,0.000008115026,0.0008885884,0.00029957882,0.00025445299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037851773,0.00014395539,0.00015970397,0.000005599867,0.0012670866,0.00010006137,0.00012612807,0.00019274358,0.000008689456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010483265,0.000008593171,0.000018558292,0.000060910224,0.00007657453,0.000028568578,0.30699956,0.000002118168,0.0000013955981,0.19781402,0.49447823,0.0005009968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001417794,0.00001625387,0.00026871433,0.00008173675,0.00006208953,6.346697e-8,0.0068875602,0.000001954152,2.92567e-7,0.00020589131,0.992188,0.00014567979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9989723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99929965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49770978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005449134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009835982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401573126","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4894230","title":"From Carter v Canada (SCC) to Bill C-14: An Appraisal of Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada and 'Charter Dialogue'.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Hearsay; Public administration","score_opus":0.01227326255983955,"score_gpt":0.2910282260577102,"score_spread":0.27875496349787066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401573126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.981756,0.0026299949,0.000026440175,0.014600576,0.00070875976,0.00010203461,0.000014688587,0.0000070236833,0.00015450026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99862355,0.00068535446,0.000016773056,0.00018923382,0.00037491988,0.000006766381,0.0000024332355,0.000009096228,0.00009187676],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969435,0.00022530952,0.0003334811,0.00023674103,0.0009501471,0.001310848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933505,0.00027283796,0.000051950312,0.00006420662,0.000047625672,0.00022834419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013321518,0.00012478519,0.00025480663,0.000052786912,0.0001626599,0.00007075112,0.000276166,0.0000754241,0.000053409185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027694393,0.00009022207,0.000025545236,0.00028025502,0.0000796214,0.00019225696,0.000042219122,0.0011177632,7.6560275e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014467939,0.00011616076,0.6753223,0.00006251314,0.00047299592,0.00069111603,0.18972617,0.00012257279,0.000527716,0.022233447,0.00594625,0.10463408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024964684,0.00031114824,0.48345765,0.0009404307,0.00008522611,0.000053020372,0.40397963,0.0013753477,0.00007548139,0.017338807,0.088412546,0.0014742557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99989516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21425346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005695435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018368334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401652260","doi":"10.1515/9782763752518-008","title":"La pensée contractuelle dans l’interprétation de la Constitution canadienne","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.024085317419286524,"score_gpt":0.28036577489772524,"score_spread":0.2562804574784387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401652260","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008764052,0.00046415188,0.0008823401,0.009927215,0.000702465,0.00048960105,0.00008400284,0.00012793865,0.97855824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92225546,0.0010422864,0.0005416445,0.00054271944,0.0004436138,0.000018419625,0.00003571374,0.00002091988,0.07509925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977878,0.00044990456,0.00041513835,0.0004722964,0.00033882973,0.0005360505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978271,0.0011608123,0.00026751438,0.00011418895,0.0001975186,0.0004328354],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071620476,0.0004138491,0.00049824384,0.000033599994,0.001153855,0.0001478105,0.00027740738,0.00069303473,0.0025120357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006179384,0.00036969996,0.00025365152,0.00007321346,0.00595162,0.00023865736,0.000091273214,0.00066423597,0.00059301645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015839463,0.000020513922,0.00036973803,0.00003594785,0.00018135578,0.00010567933,0.030050091,0.000021489519,0.0002053419,0.9620394,0.0010747543,0.005879862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042799674,0.00006582778,0.0028484897,0.00020050653,0.0002738963,0.00002508307,0.026107274,0.00021080219,0.000070271875,0.009509783,0.95965505,0.0006050478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25065228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28140584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95858026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002066464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003451708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401703770","doi":"10.4324/9781003433408-10","title":"First Nations peoples and the law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.028904871997786297,"score_gpt":0.2882093895830475,"score_spread":0.2593045175852612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401703770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000005268797,0.004770195,0.0000010449152,0.044188924,0.00028948585,0.00032412523,0.000015774202,0.0001055507,0.9502996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024370836,0.010883353,0.00004323079,0.00026970313,0.0004354679,0.000022735614,0.0000027014594,0.000011573158,0.9639604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926496,0.000014651534,0.00012149261,0.00018013002,0.00028707614,0.0001316692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832416,0.0014438551,0.00004072131,0.00007636603,0.00007191987,0.00004298558],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020285619,0.00013539453,0.00017822004,0.000018919163,0.0023546116,0.00021118214,0.00014476213,0.00014353394,0.0009116953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021205634,0.00006989956,0.000108913366,0.000027408649,0.0016502587,0.00006104696,0.00013251339,0.00016889432,0.00035944124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011461545,9.2404343e-7,0.0000015308636,0.00002714142,0.00006471486,8.6180626e-7,0.020337682,1.7772564e-7,1.69701e-8,0.9739253,0.005598661,0.000041833875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007516991,0.000002485156,0.000010674273,0.00007573761,0.00006715979,2.6927268e-7,0.0043408074,0.0000015739549,8.934219e-8,0.09571526,0.8996034,0.000107325905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017265981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73942506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89400476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083978935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003820502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99894416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401714076","doi":"","title":"Universalisme et décolonisation dans le discours juridique de la Cour suprême du Canada","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Colonisation; Art; Humanities; History; Archaeology; Colonization","score_opus":0.010807595012458834,"score_gpt":0.2523854144510876,"score_spread":0.24157781943862874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401714076","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33297777,0.008711687,0.0077396445,0.53436404,0.0009784476,0.0004099915,0.00016597363,0.00025719276,0.114395246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92791504,0.0033190062,0.0024409795,0.00027315802,0.00010617268,0.00002902562,0.000064399035,0.000036021633,0.06581622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860493,0.011937221,0.00034702534,0.0005254263,0.00057917036,0.0005618612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946192,0.0036691267,0.0001788322,0.00045907992,0.0007927176,0.00028103316],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061981096,0.0002892038,0.00027596054,0.000058355476,0.0014771329,0.00067712535,0.00073624967,0.000249524,0.00018804759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001477933,0.0003003053,0.00016812286,0.0006927149,0.0013696244,0.0005867088,0.00028414628,0.00053075544,0.000031019987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036595868,0.00016087243,0.0015401272,0.00006977935,0.00009212628,0.000036690963,0.12585053,0.0000842492,0.0006053388,0.85288787,0.015516432,0.0031523511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003474336,7.2975774e-7,0.010980131,0.0008726772,0.00010288564,0.000017503842,0.020111175,0.004837147,0.0029129868,0.0042860936,0.9550506,0.0004806304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9272402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9543063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9395342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019275541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004337651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401881235","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4916200","title":"Under the IRPA and after Irving: The Right to Standing before the Federal Court for Canadian Children Seeking&amp;nbsp; to Challenge Their Parents' Deportations&amp;nbsp;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Federal election; Law; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.02091156208835149,"score_gpt":0.3016507239482298,"score_spread":0.2807391618598783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401881235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6997491,0.0102020465,0.0021735593,0.2845851,0.00068036135,0.0015806635,0.0000554429,0.000059393224,0.00091430405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939068,0.0012852402,0.000052477317,0.0013293665,0.0011826921,0.00016419373,0.0000060631196,0.000029812089,0.002043368],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966215,0.00022146686,0.00029057756,0.00030616764,0.00047996137,0.0020803236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901646,0.00028965788,0.00008782873,0.00018559737,0.00015627565,0.00026416942],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002569633,0.00024508228,0.0001943266,0.000072533694,0.006344491,0.0009755751,0.0005547314,0.00009169004,0.000046053214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002015218,0.00010953985,0.00016567908,0.00034737636,0.00020937537,0.00021052775,0.00007706474,0.0010960805,0.000021968723],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011146394,0.000073175084,0.03990501,0.000029046576,0.0027412795,0.000007797836,0.4666991,0.00029584937,0.00003812471,0.44234252,0.016700389,0.031056238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004337702,0.00025572983,0.08838589,0.00016431663,0.00025948486,0.00013056057,0.17912507,0.000049293696,0.0000037106038,0.15090747,0.57965213,0.0006325777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056413684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97388256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9174689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021307387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013046218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402239354","doi":"10.55302/ispjr22461-2125ah","title":"EUTHANASIA – THE MACEDONIAN VIS-À-VIS THE CANADIAN LEGAL CONCEPT IN LIGHT OF THE POST-COVID ERA: ARE WE REDEFINING THE VALUE OF LIFE?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual of the Institute for Sociological, Political and Juridical Research","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Macedonian; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Value (mathematics); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Political science; Medicine; History; Virology; Ancient history; Internal medicine; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.12079978455500995,"score_gpt":0.4021341286053983,"score_spread":0.2813343440503884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402239354","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47324952,0.0009593681,7.2381926e-7,0.51881725,0.00025171135,0.00094853033,0.0005183173,0.00000776475,0.0052467766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960379,0.00011740862,0.00001379119,0.0029926249,0.00026278172,0.00013978766,0.0000036397078,0.000008076138,0.00042396452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938077,0.0028674023,0.0005368831,0.00031107513,0.0014035497,0.0010733933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947502,0.0039174086,0.00018781786,0.00037718256,0.00043852086,0.0003288897],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046759755,0.00017831777,0.00042769918,0.000042827505,0.006631628,0.00006940584,0.0020872522,0.00022034385,0.000061934305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011624885,0.000064694315,0.00035990388,0.0006097322,0.015455269,0.00009941948,0.0012487471,0.001645616,0.0000014959892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000804876,0.00008455905,0.003492941,0.000026268539,0.000071438204,0.0000027874278,0.022997865,0.00006669475,0.000031503336,0.9676275,0.005311319,0.00020661303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007967988,0.00061058876,0.12008367,0.000108544315,0.000074089425,0.000005270163,0.20251477,0.00008128274,0.00017405304,0.03930924,0.63596565,0.00027606788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35877886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13030757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92831826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044077603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020428915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99670064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402367256","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4948591","title":"Book Review of &lt;i&gt;Search and Seizure&lt;/i&gt; by Robert Diab and Chris Hunt (2025) 47 Manitoba Law Journal (forthcoming)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"History; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01283959765041145,"score_gpt":0.2927812258181518,"score_spread":0.2799416281677404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402367256","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019689333,0.9615537,0.000050792372,0.013131938,0.0007537394,0.0007879391,0.00003544659,0.000049933275,0.0039471965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06090281,0.9313134,0.0001067293,0.0010980599,0.0013163299,0.000030011686,0.000010574836,0.000059380694,0.005162682],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927855,0.000851261,0.0011682444,0.0006631981,0.0015806073,0.0029511875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770755,0.00024228115,0.00068163726,0.00026473033,0.00062056567,0.0004832292],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073135,0.00061008637,0.0012322378,0.00014635015,0.002106215,0.0006540832,0.00080715364,0.00048171738,0.00024691338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003894374,0.00047929093,0.00050433027,0.00026818417,0.0010242625,0.00034110883,0.0011238843,0.00712635,0.000022203541],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001739188,0.00039450423,0.0007420376,0.010310742,0.006979973,0.0001730633,0.021950614,0.000023660821,0.0017422705,0.22316869,0.6329383,0.101402186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000634708,0.00030376442,0.00017052006,0.007874191,0.0007992034,0.00043249037,0.0043053394,0.000015343046,0.000070614384,0.036864225,0.94768304,0.00084653654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046215975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03800012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3147447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028913768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027798307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403030053","doi":"10.3138/9781487560218-010","title":"8 Hunter v. Southam and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.018618151946142483,"score_gpt":0.21822645852202927,"score_spread":0.1996083065758868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403030053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028969266,0.0046921335,4.6803615e-7,0.00029876447,0.00013160742,0.00034586748,0.00011039539,0.000014768853,0.9941163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0678616,0.0004480919,0.0000292763,0.000016706686,0.00008948239,2.930841e-7,0.0000018769446,0.000007277992,0.9315454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992947,0.000034407243,0.00009875948,0.00019524721,0.00022156158,0.00015530927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947596,0.0000691602,0.0001076119,0.000118139345,0.00010750052,0.000121611374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014466043,0.00014348801,0.00030151024,0.000014207624,0.0005781368,0.000033263175,0.0002170862,0.00021438563,0.0001732219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000059510976,0.000106121464,0.00010078077,7.3855347e-7,0.0026145603,0.00007024925,0.00016033147,0.00013070209,0.000002495272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003480114,0.0000015247001,0.000009140945,0.000050302453,0.0002862595,0.000008579957,0.21838467,5.9621385e-8,0.0000014326129,0.7780347,0.0025779372,0.0006106341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003691617,0.00001594142,0.000099540215,0.00012509275,0.00021223337,3.3471315e-7,0.001824358,0.0000036165134,0.0000023963669,0.0040096915,0.9931987,0.00013894838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9912527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99062073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020827816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055144148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9633456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403030189","doi":"10.3138/9781487560218-003","title":"1 Laliberté v. The Queen: The First Criminal Case Decided by the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Supreme court; Law; Political science; Criminal case","score_opus":0.026500230348593595,"score_gpt":0.2333392694253535,"score_spread":0.2068390390767599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403030189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026444875,0.0045428397,0.0000018326425,0.004836644,0.0003319231,0.000625813,0.00030188222,0.000025376701,0.9890692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032296035,0.0005891102,0.000011294145,0.00011868716,0.00013343806,0.0000012323756,0.000003510278,0.00001561421,0.9668311],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985331,0.000091900576,0.00018594251,0.00023831453,0.0006858811,0.0002648102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985418,0.00052618,0.00025694165,0.00035426804,0.0002462509,0.000074596144],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003041091,0.000230333,0.00030593108,0.0000044398744,0.0017641247,0.000040068746,0.0010060231,0.00016905024,0.0003002807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034930217,0.00012923114,0.00021273592,0.0000025068618,0.001577962,0.000065987595,0.00040161292,0.00028225087,0.0000015259573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006070138,0.000009218346,0.0000049946843,0.00010121059,0.0007281867,0.00020727272,0.19539815,0.0000064705087,0.0000032000496,0.2691037,0.5334001,0.0009767617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108432374,0.000017158723,0.000023417411,0.00008092254,0.0004469754,0.0000066689486,0.0181845,0.0000059743893,0.0000129720465,0.00023824003,0.9807163,0.00015842785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9978812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4473162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008066562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003255316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403206110","doi":"10.7202/1113969ar","title":"Palliser’s Act and the Bermudian–Newfoundland Fishery of 1788","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Newfoundland and Labrador Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fishery; Oceanography; Geography; Biology; Geology","score_opus":0.03290483861172368,"score_gpt":0.30850449728085244,"score_spread":0.2755996586691288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403206110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9390507,0.029226854,7.60108e-7,0.018538201,0.00048672073,0.00047879017,0.000025886262,0.00004998265,0.012142122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98376346,0.010885222,0.000045888013,0.00039978014,0.0002533069,0.000093633105,0.000002871141,0.000010208244,0.004545627],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982507,0.00039687517,0.0002629205,0.00028017678,0.00047348408,0.00033584138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854755,0.0009751183,0.00015961591,0.00012888577,0.00010911836,0.0000797313],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009147613,0.00018841783,0.00048499604,0.000035788493,0.0035385855,0.000094007766,0.00020190925,0.000043840235,0.000087863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037568132,0.00011373341,0.00008878354,0.00024066448,0.0019266383,0.00016421339,0.00044333824,0.00022028222,0.0000018557408],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035050703,0.00010005622,0.6160462,0.00013827228,0.0009883516,0.000017971734,0.31442687,0.000010175188,0.00002172482,0.039686874,0.009890189,0.018322814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036712755,0.00016747197,0.39503703,0.000040048893,0.0002205385,0.000009213403,0.108284555,0.000015576796,0.0000014017633,0.0037367106,0.48841685,0.00039932382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033283193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.067528486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47852668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015043822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004410567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403373106","doi":"10.1515/9780228022084-018","title":"10 Are Canadian Cities Entrenched in Provincial Constitutions? A Question of Political Constitutionalism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Political science; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.023659294380046724,"score_gpt":0.24747590038635328,"score_spread":0.22381660600630657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403373106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005579558,0.000014679693,0.0000017163392,0.0016619317,0.00029806964,0.00065453403,0.002514137,0.000109025634,0.9946901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14905591,0.00006093495,0.00004184472,0.00005382143,0.00015985302,0.0000039384827,0.000056794503,0.000012869102,0.85055405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807125,0.0001273099,0.00030210055,0.0004379537,0.00051520846,0.000546163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872446,0.00014557462,0.0001820564,0.00016149115,0.00042287481,0.0003635532],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019923059,0.00032048457,0.0004893412,0.0003439768,0.0009000238,0.000048717127,0.00030598545,0.0005905865,0.00030207235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016003645,0.00034856368,0.00020592056,0.000034925222,0.0031037428,0.00014732839,0.00018571399,0.00048098993,0.000045317574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002743257,0.000010139883,0.00003165101,0.000088309556,0.00010723456,0.00022339747,0.0009320417,0.000004695011,5.471293e-7,0.99720234,0.0013227353,0.000049468144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029251102,0.00002102635,0.00008954444,0.00059277186,0.00016932802,0.0000012696082,0.0019810852,0.0000021594292,0.00001121664,0.0055742753,0.99089223,0.00037260007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7415865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.072613865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99162805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003134216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010826718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403374299","doi":"10.1515/9780228022084-016","title":"9 Constitutional Amendment and the Canadian City","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amendment; Constitutional amendment; Political science; Law; Constitution","score_opus":0.028432613227020107,"score_gpt":0.23999215111840497,"score_spread":0.21155953789138487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403374299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000005562871,0.000023127926,0.000001633971,0.0059355916,0.00036978975,0.000674524,0.000608646,0.000100107245,0.992281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031005885,0.0005262898,0.00002986104,0.00024591162,0.00017583372,0.000002824362,0.000013476417,0.000010161719,0.96798974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846464,0.000089443594,0.00014605593,0.0004128307,0.000508831,0.00037819063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990654,0.00016499928,0.0001053617,0.00016845441,0.0001805038,0.00031530389],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028282226,0.00028686487,0.00033254916,0.00006387895,0.003925507,0.00013724896,0.00035070657,0.00034740282,0.00010802676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031549484,0.00022636577,0.00018121304,0.000013474222,0.005566736,0.00008298428,0.00034092425,0.0005329421,0.000026372658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022745447,0.0000018902152,0.0000030435565,0.000018236411,0.0002377425,0.00008233329,0.00177366,0.0000013573946,8.242736e-8,0.9940494,0.0036059257,0.00020360659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040032013,0.000008063937,0.000008190902,0.00008850271,0.00024025819,8.391169e-7,0.00067758624,0.0000013765388,0.0000022960778,0.0052464847,0.9930412,0.00028486332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6656776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040175796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9894353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016422358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023340416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99737126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403505563","doi":"10.1130/abs/2024ne-397307","title":"IS BRITAIN DIVIDED BY AN ACADIAN SUTURE?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fibrous joint; Computer science; Medicine; Anatomy","score_opus":0.034557997580148214,"score_gpt":0.3153720524502469,"score_spread":0.2808140548700987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403505563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91961515,0.0041216,0.0002825422,0.06284726,0.00020253331,0.0014201556,0.0000499239,0.001044661,0.010416179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98519295,0.0008063175,0.01024372,0.0019453109,0.00025498023,0.00008259392,0.000051491166,0.000020461075,0.0014021836],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971594,0.00016019495,0.00038523765,0.0006222347,0.00079560536,0.0008773072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877983,0.0002801804,0.00017768572,0.00018607223,0.00018354523,0.00039265587],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005574994,0.0002986895,0.00044681114,0.000012978481,0.00078561495,0.00025238926,0.00046158014,0.00036924647,0.0004130266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000109840505,0.00019611316,0.00033310376,0.0006352056,0.003334373,0.00046682073,0.000095086514,0.000587646,0.00006976946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007169323,0.0013582781,0.035688404,0.0002530821,0.0010838266,0.000048529742,0.15544645,0.00005942167,0.00049950124,0.0009907745,0.16697767,0.63752234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028053555,0.00093116815,0.034507617,0.00010217612,0.00009117856,0.0000027285205,0.03835624,0.000129593,0.00014460327,0.0006906733,0.92421645,0.00054703443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026718257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041595503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7572388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014091314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000102957456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99937797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403728798","doi":"10.21991/cf29477","title":"The Puzzle and Promise of Human Dignity: R v Bissonnette","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.030429458967036686,"score_gpt":0.3182835016711685,"score_spread":0.2878540427041318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403728798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18005747,0.08241987,0.008484366,0.196089,0.010129952,0.005419654,0.0010075192,0.001659732,0.5147324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99659437,0.0006253806,0.00014126685,0.00015677519,0.0002228632,0.00009355582,0.000018490897,0.0000069848275,0.0021402873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978527,0.00012158148,0.00044862684,0.00038381782,0.00057057943,0.00062273984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987473,0.00048762216,0.000108505155,0.00018167823,0.00028965657,0.00018527369],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007190469,0.00022938944,0.000261587,0.000086751075,0.0070054494,0.00032788268,0.00030619136,0.00015369135,0.00008924625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075696333,0.00016064283,0.00017320241,0.00039276356,0.017524473,0.000587838,0.0001997752,0.000271376,0.00006113484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011848932,0.000029771305,0.004901387,0.000038284794,0.00014437329,0.000008249126,0.0009919272,0.00001325497,0.00035203714,0.98585147,0.005769017,0.0018884038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004507869,0.0000431877,0.0010815585,0.00025212092,0.00011458361,0.000026758353,0.010066826,0.0001510561,0.00025406523,0.038579814,0.9486452,0.00033405118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001018762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022997062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94727165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018728146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067086617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403728899","doi":"10.21991/cf29478","title":"A Promising Piece of the Puzzle: Human Dignity and the Role of Section 1 of the Charter","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Dignity; Section (typography); History; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.016127653866552173,"score_gpt":0.27468008543169004,"score_spread":0.25855243156513785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403728899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8108635,0.009297967,0.0014924551,0.03671759,0.0047838204,0.003600894,0.00044289487,0.00014684943,0.13265404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993911,0.00006017223,0.000032928932,0.00007906687,0.00013011892,0.000042930358,0.0000029975324,0.0000037733437,0.00025690513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823487,0.00023408097,0.0004533639,0.00022256549,0.000569469,0.00028567092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988582,0.0003147601,0.0002470495,0.0002155492,0.00031899146,0.000045450946],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073298585,0.0001580627,0.00026904006,0.000042642678,0.0029298735,0.00006073817,0.00036407466,0.000119468954,0.00004283276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064979534,0.000078522,0.00028160756,0.00045421254,0.022333756,0.00032427403,0.0002644191,0.00026190787,0.0000023943896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022409822,0.00003512928,0.019448139,0.000045147135,0.00010606395,2.0446306e-7,0.0030492605,0.00004176839,0.0025254374,0.9740045,0.00030245376,0.00041947718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056433463,0.00013257081,0.07393749,0.0038044092,0.0011557669,0.00012825265,0.100368015,0.0015559279,0.030571217,0.3425822,0.43894356,0.00117723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020234012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018466967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6314223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014206425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056091155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403776856","doi":"10.12797/9788383681696.03","title":"Abortion in Canada and the Importance of Legal Reasoning in R. v. Morgentaler","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Psychology; Political science; Pregnancy; Biology","score_opus":0.017183348767786162,"score_gpt":0.2519612773688602,"score_spread":0.23477792860107405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403776856","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.094347,0.00466907,3.3175024e-7,0.0058671767,0.00076724327,0.0008286626,0.000059121357,0.00005593307,0.89340544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7583041,0.00060620916,0.00003893022,0.0004095149,0.00035624494,0.000052663305,0.000019466355,0.00005170516,0.24016114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997084,0.00013102344,0.00083953986,0.0005289941,0.0009092039,0.0005072211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985912,0.0004458644,0.0004895336,0.0002203974,0.00013420926,0.00011880832],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018911773,0.00034099963,0.00066370866,0.00014757425,0.00026142868,0.00046344416,0.00053694204,0.00043049917,0.000059355687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009899412,0.0002570102,0.000113044545,0.00010126015,0.00076304504,0.0005972809,0.00028951582,0.0017866403,0.000002654858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055554407,0.000004402941,0.04642053,0.00013390626,0.00010806347,0.00009468448,0.024013467,0.000012356497,0.000011174192,0.9203486,0.006635468,0.0021618332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001619843,0.000014541539,0.022276424,0.0022211084,0.00013990604,0.000010408974,0.011850082,0.000110031506,0.000014116986,0.031070309,0.92967725,0.0009959628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9716932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9230418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020757215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014406197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404022282","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5005213","title":"&lt;span&gt;Confronting the Sexual Assault of Teenage Girls: The Mistake of Age Defence in Canadian Sexual Assault Law&lt;/span&gt;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Mistake; Span (engineering); Psychology; Criminology; Law; Poison control; Injury prevention; Political science; Medicine; Medical emergency; Engineering","score_opus":0.019691520150500012,"score_gpt":0.28434002532844277,"score_spread":0.26464850517794275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404022282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9389576,0.022524204,0.00010022794,0.013771584,0.0007433799,0.0007279403,0.00005585976,0.00006745378,0.023051767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924314,0.001310316,0.000044683304,0.0001448576,0.00056360575,0.000017495386,0.000004509249,0.00003072846,0.005452424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99356943,0.0007910411,0.00074426975,0.00039788638,0.0013431855,0.0031541656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982166,0.00060167967,0.00035174753,0.00026979644,0.0003325619,0.00022761116],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00823588,0.00031868505,0.0004719599,0.00012077049,0.0016091967,0.00028403423,0.0011917402,0.000277602,0.000071414135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091699813,0.00019138968,0.00018915143,0.00079748756,0.0010812777,0.0003769651,0.000098891345,0.0029542928,0.000018185312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085875756,0.00018931077,0.020863203,0.00017637968,0.0015724828,0.00016192686,0.17200632,0.00060365757,0.010114991,0.74604017,0.006184423,0.042001292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016905412,0.00083506026,0.043844886,0.0005071398,0.00059166824,0.0001796036,0.4444106,0.0012270913,0.00039685142,0.028677953,0.47605598,0.001582635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.563917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9835835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71736217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027005507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004782253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404128434","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10076","title":"The Legal Landscape of Freedom of Association in Canada: The Complex Path to Half of a Constitutional Freedom","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of association; Path (computing); Degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry); Association (psychology); Political science; Law; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Human rights; Physics","score_opus":0.029891789065787402,"score_gpt":0.27627924826424166,"score_spread":0.24638745919845426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404128434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8929706,0.008813236,0.00016358825,0.014398389,0.0007346128,0.00026040207,0.00018940741,0.0000038097749,0.082465924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99927974,0.00024461822,0.00010992163,0.000051087998,0.00012723729,5.3453397e-7,3.3448586e-7,0.000002008832,0.00018451472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983716,0.00047666012,0.0004251457,0.00006537694,0.0005418748,0.00011934778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840677,0.00068176433,0.0005113872,0.000046143545,0.0003147231,0.000039221784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011021832,0.000070242386,0.00025245696,0.000008071053,0.00020673526,0.00003369588,0.00022664804,0.000009562827,0.000013402193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016773365,0.00003803444,0.000057180154,0.00016191977,0.0006627132,0.00011957381,0.000043662087,0.00015787342,8.191889e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077477685,0.00002621642,0.012281745,0.000019039124,0.00014730799,0.000015634043,0.015229749,0.0012522262,0.00030640367,0.94860095,0.021864135,0.00017914241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005348113,0.00012428241,0.52125007,0.000361849,0.00003224683,0.0000035904081,0.008562466,0.00029167754,0.00009629463,0.00020916393,0.46843392,0.00009961156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27734593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71566546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94839174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020868574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004037168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7274663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404151707","doi":"10.59962/9780774880831-010","title":"9 Aligning Canadian Law with Indigenous Peoples’ Inherent Rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.016801881402487714,"score_gpt":0.20332706373915427,"score_spread":0.18652518233666654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404151707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004643824,0.0007588691,8.8493897e-7,0.00003662153,0.00020951281,0.0008090834,0.00063885853,0.00012777501,0.99277455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.108397156,0.00022005754,0.00009617538,0.000026803164,0.00011948101,0.0000013003695,0.000024402596,0.000028486706,0.89108616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982398,0.00004311016,0.00017014405,0.00047581395,0.00057999825,0.00049110316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989001,0.00006343358,0.00017462742,0.00017730618,0.00031280925,0.00037173767],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001233421,0.00018531873,0.0004691805,0.00004443914,0.0018743167,0.00036949912,0.0004520648,0.0004226855,0.0003947523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000050358603,0.00033291875,0.00017317475,0.000016246591,0.0013357246,0.00010630041,0.0001684581,0.0003882964,0.000026201238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044504,0.00005971809,0.00022510224,0.00084658345,0.0029958624,0.007290016,0.2858786,0.000011301154,0.000003061819,0.5769427,0.113437,0.012265556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025812248,0.000056802022,0.00017222734,0.0011541808,0.00029415468,0.00001400918,0.0040225857,5.332286e-7,6.450837e-7,0.0018798669,0.9916593,0.0004875816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9992249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99993527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8782223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083045894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056438893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404346773","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4976697","title":"Threatening Reconciliation: The Supreme Court of Canada’s Foundational Jurisprudence on Aboriginal Rights and Title, 1990-1997&amp;nbsp;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.022235667064941317,"score_gpt":0.3179776824266977,"score_spread":0.29574201536175637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404346773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40684664,0.05276118,0.0003890635,0.08548224,0.010504693,0.001562969,0.0002204958,0.00016596988,0.44206676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9671291,0.0056082187,0.000090534784,0.000087920904,0.001452471,0.000011327892,0.000012427029,0.000013003686,0.02559497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979618,0.0001251902,0.0002460844,0.00020911699,0.00071648887,0.00074129645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992731,0.00014894921,0.00020796923,0.0000995615,0.0002085273,0.0000618429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013310666,0.00015518139,0.00019382875,0.000033398122,0.0008192551,0.00012139872,0.00029822634,0.000114694674,0.00018501328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000085486376,0.00010003672,0.00008043435,0.00008869521,0.00020203288,0.000051777453,0.00007997908,0.0019280756,0.000027328568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027357868,0.00001755988,0.0006017436,0.000036132777,0.0005062131,0.0000042546067,0.005464414,0.00005562444,0.0000071615996,0.95600516,0.0329699,0.004304487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011178996,0.000033564065,0.0009795864,0.00015234336,0.00009067091,0.000017711302,0.0012441728,0.000027765796,0.000008447955,0.337945,0.65918285,0.00020605316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23033439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8027598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62621295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024824354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010769129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404410368","doi":"10.2307/jj.21874112.9","title":"Des précédents en droit de la famille canadien:","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses de l'Université Laval eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.014461006241355762,"score_gpt":0.2385718593907156,"score_spread":0.22411085314935983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404410368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1019662,0.0063215666,0.000026405454,0.0005954316,0.0005952769,0.0005133875,0.00017876668,0.00023122471,0.8895717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46353447,0.0070357122,0.00047533,0.00010212029,0.0005625455,0.000013642457,0.000013014761,0.00008272546,0.5281804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696964,0.00032529444,0.000310372,0.00068950385,0.0006371465,0.001068027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980538,0.00071186316,0.0001953616,0.00026149713,0.0002025075,0.0005749767],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049726194,0.0006198415,0.0005932433,0.000118665615,0.0014903325,0.00025194252,0.0009679657,0.00087083015,0.0012703208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001430352,0.0006499251,0.00044129524,0.0000678235,0.002401631,0.00019190669,0.0007631841,0.0009431863,0.00045330633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009280958,0.000059839505,0.008102398,0.00085417624,0.002106015,0.0023189418,0.21481659,0.00012481477,0.0006955552,0.72491205,0.005923162,0.03999367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004546886,0.000114179624,0.0042024446,0.00093233574,0.0011374394,0.00005691799,0.025433788,0.000078002726,0.0003347635,0.040328562,0.9259041,0.0010228023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21809027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13468511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91998094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045937477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041499862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404468661","doi":"10.1007/s44202-024-00282-8","title":"Intersectional racial and gender bias in family court","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discover Psychology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Ottawa Public Health; Manitoba Beekeepers' Association; University of Ottawa","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Gender bias; Psychology; Gender studies; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.12039619817645661,"score_gpt":0.4274670451959085,"score_spread":0.30707084701945186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404468661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91536254,0.002389597,0.00012812228,0.009737329,0.0022876842,0.00014785117,0.000012202431,0.000060841874,0.06987382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972266,0.00042449683,0.000052241954,0.0009156221,0.0003751532,0.000019054987,0.0000032120192,0.0000062113177,0.0009774377],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990739,0.00014674768,0.00013225932,0.0002657143,0.00015426015,0.00022712038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997451,0.00012637905,0.000016684047,0.00004939488,0.000018752284,0.00004374383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003271974,0.00008398934,0.000116122064,0.000059909613,0.00016117946,0.00007819115,0.00008272762,0.00010882513,0.00021621409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000091826194,0.00006752665,0.000044935052,0.00018183721,0.0003956827,0.00019375872,0.000038987357,0.00019381406,0.000092588336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020096147,0.00025696497,0.16172709,0.000066519315,0.00030537104,0.00017980099,0.45393667,0.000015071881,0.0014542566,0.1993132,0.14954747,0.032996632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033314302,0.000034313685,0.61598337,0.000019042003,0.000012009874,0.00000383389,0.011148095,0.000027610906,0.0000022258541,0.0074213413,0.36484635,0.00016868174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018995665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040171747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45425627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009469217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035417615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2871589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404806080","doi":"10.1515/9780295804583-015","title":"Letter 12. To Ignace Bourget, Bishop of Montreal, February 6, 1850","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Washington Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.03145209609796945,"score_gpt":0.23506562431093816,"score_spread":0.20361352821296871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404806080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035860357,0.00025966088,0.000024706582,0.0011314332,0.00025250117,0.00081261987,0.00010168758,0.0000977441,0.9937336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015438362,0.00031481546,0.0006262145,0.0002504225,0.00022625472,9.419075e-7,0.000010877444,0.000032899872,0.9830992],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800503,0.00009636127,0.0002956003,0.00044782335,0.00075054885,0.00040462916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983478,0.00018328795,0.00049061904,0.00034222004,0.00038678368,0.00024926808],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024855492,0.00033602084,0.00069193984,0.0001255601,0.00058188173,0.000047952573,0.0008945251,0.00047163942,0.0004649148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006335355,0.00035600347,0.00034110376,0.000013604578,0.00092630176,0.00020117643,0.00054786843,0.0003636897,0.00005366664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013090471,0.00006559365,0.0001082968,0.000312845,0.0008673633,0.000051699575,0.1582545,0.000036996957,0.00044395827,0.1495383,0.6775683,0.012621248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000295214,0.000057457728,0.00040295467,0.0003158475,0.00016521265,2.2369773e-7,0.0020920665,0.0000025668078,0.00015994691,0.0005999144,0.99549073,0.00041788135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22246486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021247296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3179224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023983158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009029827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404806308","doi":"10.1515/9780295804583-017","title":"Letter 14. To Ignace Bourget, Bishop of Montreal, November 22, 1850","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Washington Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.02905950517244223,"score_gpt":0.23844384128731452,"score_spread":0.20938433611487228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404806308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003003175,0.00019012476,0.000028675151,0.0009814709,0.00027585958,0.00077621656,0.000108333006,0.000087777225,0.9945484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017076869,0.00016658341,0.00060718314,0.0002691045,0.00021243548,9.4935734e-7,0.000009120088,0.000033734774,0.981624],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979336,0.00008348962,0.00030539936,0.00046456262,0.0008081553,0.0004047707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814653,0.00018524368,0.0005104166,0.00035574945,0.00055452326,0.0002475035],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025313284,0.00035022813,0.0007093585,0.00011800717,0.0005332564,0.000052133517,0.0008636961,0.00050141517,0.0009857109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007448244,0.00036693452,0.00035012464,0.000018464934,0.0009265172,0.00020205384,0.00055311155,0.00037735063,0.00007289247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011988987,0.00006055071,0.00003604442,0.00022221936,0.0006985327,0.000037058955,0.08762452,0.000027806016,0.00041735594,0.13959098,0.764044,0.007121067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003475829,0.000044439246,0.0000963512,0.00027018608,0.0001610821,2.1024967e-7,0.0012669306,0.0000035059704,0.0002247819,0.00067132886,0.99650264,0.00041097094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.105481654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012372756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23245865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024719536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008448424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404826366","doi":"10.1177/00033286241300562","title":"A Tale of Two Doctrines: Marriage in the Diocese of Toronto","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.044928048951427546,"score_gpt":0.3922071308069095,"score_spread":0.34727908185548195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404826366","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10652789,0.7259641,0.0000055294113,0.008110043,0.000109142835,0.00096924487,0.000012132579,0.00004996414,0.15825191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8470117,0.15190819,0.0000523537,0.00050064374,0.00007507663,0.00005798731,0.000001149781,0.0000024359165,0.00039050012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843377,0.0005916831,0.00032035896,0.00016289731,0.00029625162,0.00019504863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989016,0.00077612104,0.00008089585,0.0001497183,0.000056126584,0.00003552731],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016551041,0.000094284565,0.0003745619,0.0000065749814,0.000071297036,0.000013318859,0.00041934664,0.000041954965,0.0014122728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013555231,0.0000431427,0.0001809889,0.000304303,0.00058330013,0.000096547556,0.00007771191,0.00010079573,0.000014714219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008345119,0.000112062946,0.0021477197,0.0012661334,0.0000474362,0.000028483551,0.015641093,2.9055133e-7,0.00008341133,0.9152122,0.003909283,0.061543547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036543235,0.00031865743,0.023881821,0.0055397707,0.00022026687,0.000005167522,0.012754111,0.000010551316,0.000055404147,0.02780925,0.92864233,0.0003972245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011421831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007340963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92473304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006327873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029543518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404971028","doi":"10.1353/jur.2024.a945240","title":"Lay Associations of Christ's Faithful and the Church's Response to Allegations of Sexual Abuse","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJurist/˜The œjurist","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bishops; Sexual abuse; Law; Promulgation; Criminology; Child sexual abuse; Virtue; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Medicine; Poison control; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.024223900093380865,"score_gpt":0.3181875562783264,"score_spread":0.2939636561849455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404971028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91657406,0.007982403,0.0003607695,0.060907587,0.0010312287,0.0023009598,0.0007080104,0.00029562754,0.009839379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98628706,0.00038392842,0.00020432686,0.0003328954,0.000550553,0.00020239045,0.000012848138,0.000035153822,0.011990841],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99533516,0.0017963034,0.00073056266,0.00047870725,0.0010945174,0.0005647664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99265665,0.0059526986,0.0002860594,0.0005697319,0.00038050144,0.00015437517],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004819454,0.00031836933,0.00052027643,0.00010131849,0.002578035,0.0004423185,0.0009308585,0.00019789526,0.00013884678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010930215,0.00017309262,0.00024961616,0.0011664375,0.002500529,0.00026521095,0.00023232086,0.000523225,0.000070791364],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007462607,0.00029604422,0.004369362,0.00019797919,0.001339322,0.000020463676,0.82150936,0.00021526842,0.0025500073,0.0455249,0.11605689,0.0071741566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012350694,0.00023807603,0.1712313,0.00020117784,0.0006305006,0.000005816031,0.07399821,0.0006271345,0.00012273017,0.0022353884,0.7488031,0.00067149225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022400348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019445604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74751115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035589017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003438452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99872047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405010327","doi":"10.1080/02757206.2024.2435660","title":"More as a sin rather than a crime: clerical sexual abuse and jurisdictional pluralism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Anthropology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Social Innovation; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Criminology; Pluralism (philosophy); Sexual abuse; Sociology; Political science; Law; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Philosophy; Medicine; Epistemology; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.03228605509485229,"score_gpt":0.3389019885954877,"score_spread":0.30661593350063543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405010327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94826007,0.030198256,0.000016446076,0.013417875,0.0015748247,0.00012238964,0.000008387929,0.0001578133,0.0062439153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856707,0.001665337,0.00008100041,0.0005666192,0.0005343536,0.00001425758,0.0000027950855,0.000009440354,0.011455518],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991305,0.00013376612,0.00010665598,0.00027093999,0.00013742554,0.00022074913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996869,0.00011429594,0.00002250933,0.00004656431,0.00002972669,0.00010001351],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013473633,0.00010780153,0.00015689312,0.000033205157,0.0007160188,0.000027381333,0.00005448447,0.00013164303,0.0011579515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041044295,0.00008564862,0.00003164947,0.00005951944,0.0046513462,0.00013693176,0.000033727476,0.00016649769,0.000044508794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006158825,0.00010105713,0.0020413236,0.000050458384,0.00013975603,0.0001841604,0.7204953,3.857343e-7,0.0008261586,0.1623142,0.104026936,0.0097587155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013788919,0.000093237366,0.004803417,0.000010666647,0.000029204988,0.000020914717,0.03945804,0.000022599797,0.0000056449094,0.0003787621,0.9548993,0.00014032667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008336129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010509997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85087234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000233834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008117125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405061322","doi":"10.1176/appi.books.9781615379750.lg04","title":"Chapter 4. Delineating the Meaning of Disturbance of Mind in Canadian Infanticide Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"American Psychiatric Association Publishing eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Meaning (existential); Law; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.018963689405661652,"score_gpt":0.2655176989360784,"score_spread":0.24655400953041676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405061322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002139266,0.00029534154,0.000010327903,0.014844722,0.000457164,0.00053582015,0.00011531105,0.000031605636,0.9815704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9712018,0.00007699062,0.0010655238,0.0011858826,0.0005874458,0.0000141123455,0.000022868468,0.0000444307,0.025800997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967859,0.0001699692,0.0009686278,0.00040283147,0.0011227317,0.0005499391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99546397,0.000757279,0.0027579274,0.00021911031,0.00059220527,0.00020950408],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016264663,0.000298624,0.0007423647,0.00018660416,0.00060289144,0.00027052977,0.00070351636,0.00024389823,0.00004942578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022777244,0.00025501207,0.0002596448,0.00024087541,0.0005972064,0.00035915867,0.00010475668,0.0008085648,0.0000063792163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011184349,0.000008510742,0.04132058,0.000029694625,0.00025125974,0.0000024595477,0.03651865,0.000013958234,0.000004635595,0.9111094,0.0018986535,0.008831006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007746038,0.0001407536,0.012261637,0.0003973747,0.000441995,6.6544015e-7,0.019948343,0.00014107597,0.00001273949,0.014924177,0.9497008,0.0012558348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7908672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82775515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9690625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00124252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005805211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326970","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.9021","title":"Section 15: How Indigenous Use of the Charter Tool is About Returning to Respect Not Creating Equity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill-Queen's University Press; University of Windsor; Yukon University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Equity (law); Repatriation; Government (linguistics); Colonialism; Disadvantage; Charter; Political science; Constitution; Law; Sociology; Public administration; High Court; Freedom of information","score_opus":0.10521765265068823,"score_gpt":0.37993091320413935,"score_spread":0.27471326055345113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852017,0.00015668305,0.00009417761,0.0056112143,0.0010315423,0.00087402115,0.000044181797,0.000090038855,0.0068964097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99247766,0.00003510479,0.00045678706,0.00078809774,0.0009806847,0.00003274656,7.515487e-7,0.000019853067,0.0052083354],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799746,0.00017168072,0.0002968164,0.0003409465,0.0007942596,0.0003988479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987476,0.00046113768,0.00015751724,0.0002462688,0.00028624447,0.00010123034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006935496,0.00016164493,0.00026749057,0.00009226293,0.00071937265,0.0006046263,0.0006013533,0.00012369727,0.00016897409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018463694,0.00011769423,0.0001371288,0.00069546717,0.00016719599,0.00077506783,0.0005443355,0.00027319818,0.000027599455],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023574843,0.000104516876,0.017286113,0.0012788109,0.00037686626,0.000015791167,0.8764899,0.00047260613,0.054815993,0.0016666389,0.024375582,0.022881437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004762698,0.00036620512,0.6959612,0.0028801796,0.001054994,0.000003384076,0.035777666,0.0003215081,0.0591562,0.00013507652,0.20275594,0.0011113592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073862798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016707394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84071225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028991996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001361845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406587778","doi":"","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL STATUS OF CANADIAN CROWN PEOPLES: PROBLEM QUESTIONS","year":2018,"lang":"uk","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Crown (dentistry); Law; Political science; Legal status; Medicine","score_opus":0.209928550156389,"score_gpt":0.5263830772853679,"score_spread":0.3164545271289789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406587778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7857312,0.04570683,0.000041917418,0.0027318266,0.0017928076,0.0015661352,0.0010446722,0.00004098502,0.16134362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94614404,0.050788153,0.00060728146,0.00019951549,0.00058599026,0.000034831784,0.000013736528,0.00001941485,0.0016070432],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953436,0.0006080714,0.0011711875,0.0005867781,0.0011490516,0.0011412628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949903,0.0006035778,0.0011199468,0.0002776378,0.0017376518,0.0012708782],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015149241,0.00044345573,0.0010270315,0.00072639016,0.0028805425,0.0018754804,0.0017982086,0.00026820076,0.011906272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017210607,0.00039215767,0.00021525609,0.0022178288,0.007449351,0.0032296134,0.0007866308,0.0005160613,0.00003788294],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018018644,0.00037843347,0.7816882,0.00030871358,0.0009838314,0.000048585454,0.02202581,0.00004065013,0.005296367,0.088553324,0.094787024,0.005708836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051804975,0.000031524007,0.63895726,0.0008991264,0.00021372792,0.000010732214,0.005453208,0.000010413616,0.00059279817,0.0020421909,0.35071316,0.0005578053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9061566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8019445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25592613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072890124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00368993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406923504","doi":"10.3138/tjt-2024-0052","title":"The United Church of Canada's Theology of Inclusion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Theology; Philosophy; Sociology; Religious studies; Gender studies","score_opus":0.01709733267465191,"score_gpt":0.3098861851985769,"score_spread":0.292788852523925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406923504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8321084,0.039317377,0.00009094184,0.030407986,0.0032650714,0.00021324128,0.0000088464085,0.000016728116,0.094571434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995348,0.0019214309,0.00007126994,0.00008170701,0.00024093036,0.0000010469879,3.391002e-7,0.00000495581,0.002330359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998207,0.00063290703,0.00044024506,0.00007374642,0.0003926836,0.00025341538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774927,0.0013438788,0.00032845954,0.00009194793,0.00042140324,0.000065046195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001752028,0.000083207946,0.0002921631,0.000029533558,0.0006025716,0.000008017826,0.0005255769,0.00009613631,0.0004888167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084443326,0.000045126115,0.00010576786,0.00012169425,0.0009128526,0.0000926326,0.00030129805,0.00017589692,6.430159e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029340392,0.00005561649,0.0020539835,0.000048569316,0.0006222695,0.000045228975,0.104773894,0.00009635786,0.0029124618,0.8573422,0.021302756,0.010453302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096080155,0.0009710375,0.031996593,0.00024284399,0.00028179263,0.000075682816,0.059786603,0.00020574612,0.0017391394,0.08608986,0.81729656,0.00035335845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71888125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8507282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7959938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047659126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061209186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407221364","doi":"10.3138/9781442634985-006","title":"CHAPTER TWO Situating the Constitutional, Legal, and Historical Foundations of Canadian Municipal Government","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Public administration; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06195355818328334,"score_gpt":0.2628243161618555,"score_spread":0.20087075797857212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407221364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009971141,0.0033596286,0.000004957673,0.0007537159,0.0002338613,0.00027991305,0.00013481455,0.000016039441,0.99511737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0524744,0.001583245,0.0001811123,0.000024842215,0.00011586664,5.88597e-7,0.000003919734,0.0000071923005,0.94560885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990461,0.000025265028,0.00014149198,0.00019002955,0.00044063502,0.00015648102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993539,0.000115231,0.00015689059,0.00013130649,0.00012314257,0.00011951835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015250697,0.00013715884,0.00022629605,0.000017158138,0.0008781625,0.000027562512,0.00026097574,0.00011741553,0.00026162047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002724383,0.0001231616,0.00011557107,0.000002128653,0.0017197145,0.00010270558,0.00018687385,0.00014932723,0.0000025463974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063265593,0.0000028662978,0.0000041892486,0.000018023884,0.00015092907,0.0000067105775,0.029846668,0.0000025608826,0.000005798522,0.96771854,0.001303713,0.00093369704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112570655,0.000016628888,0.000018730652,0.00009054743,0.000182581,5.313118e-7,0.00232921,0.000013605432,0.0000017329679,0.0005227129,0.9965842,0.00012698164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98337585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9816285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99528044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023360874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016591165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67542046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407417097","doi":"10.18543/fvsc6124","title":"Los pueblos indígenas de Canadá y la defensa de sus territorios sagrados Análisis sociológico y jurisprudencial","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"book","venue":"Universidad de Deusto eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.014100925064831587,"score_gpt":0.2840338031398744,"score_spread":0.26993287807504285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407417097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20129845,0.0010151102,0.000059232563,0.0020983568,0.0013651638,0.0013129037,0.00073000585,0.0004231569,0.7916976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5110583,0.0014728387,0.0012264515,0.0010629997,0.005372663,0.00007471762,0.00013575744,0.00021974048,0.47937655],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915703,0.0018773038,0.00078018394,0.0014125628,0.001693313,0.00266634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951423,0.0012919565,0.00074709527,0.0006816425,0.0007691032,0.0013678949],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001231786,0.0012937643,0.0014845347,0.00039504239,0.0034809995,0.0007278414,0.0018292769,0.0028732417,0.00044735245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007373073,0.00141366,0.0012006147,0.00033757495,0.002297674,0.0002902273,0.00076761417,0.0023320005,0.000097441625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006221427,0.00073178246,0.027869297,0.0014598182,0.006416839,0.014234708,0.4709794,0.00009860762,0.00448738,0.118426815,0.32770625,0.026966974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016154777,0.00014111587,0.0057290713,0.00070528995,0.0013654141,0.00007341916,0.0530611,0.00003543355,0.00044311027,0.0008531584,0.9340481,0.0019292854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12396459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10311302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6063419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016511157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010767795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408092856","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1445","title":"From Rights to Justice: Perspectives on Access to Disability Justice in BritishColumbia (Attorney General) v. Council of Canadians with Disabilities","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.07085717314053648,"score_gpt":0.3558371160412499,"score_spread":0.28497994290071343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408092856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.774615,0.08643889,0.000018515575,0.058887966,0.0014929818,0.0054283612,0.0011980301,0.0002544689,0.07166581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889711,0.0062278737,0.00042381507,0.0018423926,0.00076956255,0.00033684375,0.000011375574,0.000026598409,0.0013903956],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665034,0.0003963418,0.0004864121,0.00075800676,0.0011712098,0.00053768966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786085,0.00071860437,0.000060665683,0.00038494874,0.0005990026,0.0003759383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010794863,0.00026659804,0.00070156786,0.000019035653,0.0005301588,0.00029148825,0.0006061955,0.000086269916,0.00070130057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018722556,0.00021739949,0.000132885,0.0007364852,0.0008715722,0.00045662178,0.00011799091,0.0002363364,0.00007551833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013846664,0.0007042097,0.007245783,0.015988909,0.00043279812,0.000088865134,0.49136603,0.00019484987,0.000041846866,0.30213916,0.17677915,0.0048799273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019565297,0.00015325166,0.009975764,0.010547514,0.00065642985,9.0386806e-7,0.03505347,0.000009753256,0.000011771117,0.0010247953,0.941749,0.00062174606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82218635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9440821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7649698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043192194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065569265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408092878","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1444","title":"Council of Canadians with Disabilities: Another Reminder to Resolve Cases on the Merits","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.11468067553825669,"score_gpt":0.3321221844529251,"score_spread":0.2174415089146684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408092878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012488888,0.24748433,0.000017659308,0.29146165,0.00072885735,0.0043333652,0.00030665626,0.00022959517,0.442949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91345507,0.03218931,0.00038920616,0.025419783,0.0005830408,0.00049437693,0.0000059296826,0.00007397624,0.027389301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998058,0.00021567443,0.00023899034,0.00026920708,0.0008925606,0.00032556715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983151,0.0009062941,0.000043147844,0.00027660342,0.00035139307,0.000107442036],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011541974,0.00016290952,0.00033196216,0.000008108456,0.00043874487,0.000064488646,0.00027866612,0.000045601402,0.0010166384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014326615,0.00008409303,0.0001100288,0.00035412534,0.0006676913,0.00009781187,0.000031769443,0.0001369224,0.00011525115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024744146,0.000056210385,0.00025904793,0.0027566138,0.00028070688,0.000039087277,0.09579762,0.000003845416,0.000024997016,0.47012722,0.42747125,0.0031586287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028653916,0.00006420115,0.000043198535,0.004458027,0.0000720587,0.0000017966773,0.0047323043,6.564758e-7,0.000013459091,0.00014230025,0.99030477,0.0001385967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17359918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46199024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90096617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091973017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006445497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408170656","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x24000838","title":"General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Synod; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014200758939490672,"score_gpt":0.284790262601031,"score_spread":0.27058950366154033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408170656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.713247,0.000386036,0.00014563731,0.01878687,0.0010799909,0.00018192589,0.000017521328,0.000010981073,0.26614407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980779,0.000016844791,0.00030383634,0.00027681977,0.00021226994,0.0000013655492,1.155374e-7,0.0000030631718,0.0011077704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985149,0.00022141876,0.0003075216,0.00008597214,0.00057906465,0.00029110487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916106,0.00026697654,0.00012543473,0.000090452355,0.00024525844,0.00011078451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041653286,0.000077199555,0.00021039647,0.0000125009165,0.0010571686,0.000025862013,0.00037973517,0.00005540218,0.00017871408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077593635,0.00004695855,0.00010838155,0.00024244537,0.0007862263,0.0000507073,0.00009194867,0.00025774032,4.9821807e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022497177,0.00006262065,0.007991371,0.000020924468,0.00012179289,0.000009631802,0.0023334662,0.00009528565,0.0006831502,0.973302,0.01403693,0.0013203307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001407042,0.00011058894,0.70929277,0.00046882257,0.0002839487,0.000025057354,0.019275598,0.00024353608,0.005284626,0.019378277,0.2437227,0.00050703593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48026302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6813512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9539237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002577006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061540987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8130993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408509886","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5176889","title":"Legal Pluralism in Canada and the Vitality of Indigenous Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Vitality; Indigenous; Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Political science; Sociology; Legal realism; Comparative law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology; Ecology","score_opus":0.01002613972229188,"score_gpt":0.27349016904470624,"score_spread":0.26346402932241436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408509886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9646693,0.014217242,0.0000096616905,0.010131506,0.0006433013,0.00059656764,0.000029691078,0.000010518979,0.009692217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871348,0.011268337,0.000010789407,0.00017935559,0.00018270718,0.000014550174,0.0000020054117,0.000004932035,0.001202535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966154,0.0006531131,0.0004414525,0.00020767948,0.0005586062,0.0015237159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990457,0.00025591647,0.00034772235,0.00013594663,0.00015344453,0.00006123778],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031642946,0.00018706033,0.00048244823,0.00003361323,0.00077729847,0.00008992871,0.00057153986,0.00015068077,0.0000075762628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023506669,0.00012223951,0.00012500906,0.00014296322,0.00063782925,0.0000930143,0.00032276096,0.0032916975,2.65768e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006944794,0.000020214153,0.00840725,0.00003357321,0.00036581303,0.000005731105,0.032602504,0.00009207892,0.0000015917667,0.9547714,0.000059233236,0.003571185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038172426,0.00007513998,0.028762946,0.0004371306,0.00033972753,0.000038886683,0.20449363,0.0000297033,0.00003497542,0.72991395,0.03108265,0.00097404624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99922496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99989206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22485745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073836027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022800034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408605083","doi":"10.3735/9781961844056.book-part-095","title":"Constitution Act of Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03189581833621465,"score_gpt":0.284217254932708,"score_spread":0.25232143659649336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408605083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000024573224,0.0010266772,0.0000010823226,0.0024493863,0.00082984654,0.00016926744,0.00003570167,0.000043588523,0.99541986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.064789206,0.00030953225,0.000029308805,0.000069798356,0.00022536541,0.0000020434059,0.0000046570603,0.0000051625875,0.93456495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990863,0.000007417311,0.00016337687,0.00014756294,0.00044454602,0.00015080466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960566,0.00007047372,0.00007300174,0.00006405517,0.00012375704,0.000063084284],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011060718,0.000121164485,0.00021283996,0.000016468413,0.0002577165,0.000019613,0.00011471704,0.00015118136,0.0020345456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060591006,0.00008953509,0.00007996288,0.00001946721,0.0005039928,0.000037276375,0.000048263177,0.00014969238,0.00006000114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.2520864e-7,8.67379e-7,0.0000071606455,0.000023000644,0.00006589335,0.0000060900857,0.00090212736,5.4939875e-7,0.0000018067221,0.9431562,0.055408467,0.000427034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021636532,0.0000040924224,0.000017958306,0.00007691635,0.00003757787,1.7142642e-7,0.0007218206,4.8647024e-7,0.000010040197,0.007867646,0.9911216,0.000120039535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9118651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98509353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9357132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000609427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001081364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408999767","doi":"10.14712/23366478.2025.220","title":"Předmluva Alaina Dudoita, mimořádného a zplnomocněného velvyslance Kanady v České republice","year":2020,"lang":"cs","type":"article","venue":"AUC IURIDICA","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.041106600753431394,"score_gpt":0.29759983124927936,"score_spread":0.25649323049584793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408999767","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2368586,0.020236652,0.00010652052,0.50929254,0.0042555174,0.0030409605,0.0003903137,0.0014141514,0.22440475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9721943,0.0032657029,0.00059616775,0.009264102,0.004041047,0.0000981254,0.000040353785,0.00009388138,0.0104062855],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922161,0.0008296303,0.0011458412,0.0017209358,0.0019806712,0.0021067841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99589074,0.0006618179,0.00072429545,0.00071746996,0.0005620874,0.0014436136],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010691273,0.0008884077,0.0012531689,0.00007999504,0.0030576,0.00059667806,0.0018495964,0.0006673037,0.0026930224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034642406,0.00082575623,0.0006256115,0.001892564,0.0016552139,0.0009820004,0.0008280495,0.0012334727,0.0036689362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001952475,0.00050892634,0.011264331,0.0004440722,0.0010288702,0.0003874462,0.22119911,0.00002093747,0.0006812447,0.019194696,0.7341944,0.01088072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011521789,0.0003693596,0.014639247,0.00014584453,0.000258911,0.0000053313306,0.018567113,0.00022265955,0.00024105924,0.00028440641,0.96286035,0.0012535563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018330911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002938328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7353357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007383549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064624666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409975918","doi":"10.1515/9782766302789-023","title":"Le juge Louis-Philippe Brodeur : un défenseur pas si discret du droit civil québécois à la Cour suprême du Canada","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01341693823279707,"score_gpt":0.22121563823044574,"score_spread":0.20779869999764866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409975918","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0142160095,0.008110072,0.000018593933,0.09019972,0.004849196,0.0010112313,0.00075761694,0.0003885257,0.88044906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.531846,0.004372351,0.000052350464,0.0012630023,0.0024177798,0.000039965846,0.0000602374,0.00012613466,0.4598222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931533,0.00031226862,0.001174614,0.0016566825,0.0021499547,0.0015532356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963072,0.0012510098,0.0004487851,0.0005863013,0.0005915042,0.0008152045],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082304014,0.0014158642,0.0015581845,0.00009028515,0.0025647848,0.0005214951,0.0012274447,0.00095325033,0.0054192417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042744764,0.0012172804,0.00080122554,0.0003424879,0.0025633585,0.00039864067,0.0008448278,0.0014321393,0.0009522386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019251122,0.00006900261,0.0009347864,0.00020967113,0.00082518946,0.0006856441,0.009418521,0.0000141086975,0.000009591186,0.9633007,0.022842066,0.001671467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042071828,0.000081796774,0.0013568454,0.00034127117,0.0004676305,0.000043150387,0.008192342,0.00007408173,0.000009232553,0.01660336,0.97077525,0.0016343312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99921453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9479332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022687358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031813064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409976098","doi":"10.1515/9782766302789-031","title":"« Plus qu’un droit, mieux qu’un contrat, l’emphytéose est une institution1 » : l’évolution historique de l’emphytéose en droit québécois","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.018808217300351694,"score_gpt":0.2610707020825472,"score_spread":0.24226248478219548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409976098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034754068,0.04484188,0.0015479076,0.01839651,0.01116406,0.0032922132,0.00043180803,0.0014278846,0.88414365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6280366,0.019311883,0.0015154894,0.0008995442,0.0050636614,0.00030988845,0.00013214759,0.00019065564,0.3445401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99130523,0.00044206693,0.0019563327,0.0022305732,0.0018928179,0.0021729816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99539137,0.0008711555,0.0008984638,0.00088632386,0.00087549275,0.0010772034],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001491972,0.0019393646,0.0021896388,0.00030384987,0.0034316815,0.00041048418,0.0014161912,0.0024886953,0.0022623413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066561345,0.0018879848,0.0015084026,0.0007999415,0.0048128995,0.0011326862,0.00059272256,0.002368476,0.0037182022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010055376,0.0002144627,0.00020992255,0.00033216298,0.0011942922,0.00035740816,0.039752826,0.00012923639,0.00023082405,0.93557066,0.0035934343,0.018314226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014322317,0.000330508,0.0026509173,0.0009669529,0.0012201483,0.00007866614,0.006159226,0.0004813718,0.00014144587,0.058244776,0.9255948,0.0026989533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46036687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4417493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92200136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025146743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002191477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410242589","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avae032","title":"First Nations’ Citizenship and Kinship Compared: Belonging’s Stake in Legality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kinship; Citizenship; Politics; Principle of legality; Political science; Law; Fictive kinship; Sociology","score_opus":0.08467716980806435,"score_gpt":0.37401767553068943,"score_spread":0.2893405057226251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410242589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96164423,0.0022750928,0.00007028079,0.01714911,0.00019894824,0.00016162948,0.000007155044,0.000025067204,0.018468479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989021,0.0002517743,0.0002487405,0.00019038457,0.00022380316,0.000005017731,3.9999122e-7,0.0000053184276,0.00017244944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981764,0.0006697663,0.00035451754,0.00012425671,0.00042968767,0.00024539014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975473,0.0018414253,0.0002449578,0.00007480224,0.00019254426,0.000098967124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012591305,0.00012518706,0.00042182233,0.000078384895,0.0009073486,0.0002321204,0.00027831574,0.0000179371,0.000028685778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008727155,0.00007820021,0.00008617524,0.0007001975,0.0023863532,0.0002268786,0.000044448694,0.00037518406,0.00000938195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013474561,0.00005125396,0.01057996,0.000028529572,0.00027807415,0.00003832776,0.23079188,0.00041841718,0.0000390577,0.75407606,0.0028131518,0.00075051084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010591227,0.000607653,0.4344464,0.000938268,0.00017945601,0.000060248836,0.27543226,0.0007242451,0.00013910241,0.10101887,0.18464702,0.0007473685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028011806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023667648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6530572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022755489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008219355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410260561","doi":"10.1353/ces.2025.a960311","title":"A Public Opinion Discussion about the Canadian Oath of Citizenship","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian ethnic studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oath; Citizenship; Public opinion; Political science; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.26019910579530836,"score_gpt":0.4180588853166936,"score_spread":0.15785977952138525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410260561","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011634784,0.18620612,0.0000035248622,0.54085636,0.0037809126,0.0013359588,0.000119464035,0.00009089858,0.255972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98072225,0.008532957,0.00002216427,0.001849098,0.00022440289,0.000080030375,0.000005287971,0.000008414807,0.008555382],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980076,0.0003243904,0.00027387013,0.0002564511,0.00032395578,0.00081372005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836814,0.00036163564,0.000089187895,0.00023746032,0.00048797822,0.0004555954],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010000307,0.00017224399,0.0003116541,0.00020618452,0.002804156,0.000042717857,0.0004976513,0.00015125185,0.000079338795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034806484,0.00009519432,0.000121122015,0.0009873755,0.0015828398,0.00008737438,0.00008235899,0.0002583552,0.000022262817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006211714,0.000013120344,0.015488663,0.00011659007,0.00092110777,0.000009720372,0.18512191,0.0000062024646,0.000010237185,0.2911593,0.32235867,0.18478829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023020314,0.000018194414,0.5633106,0.00023153516,0.000050675262,3.0323838e-7,0.11281185,0.000003996641,0.000007771853,0.0069737905,0.31610492,0.00025613187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9703084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9690875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021841964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002580133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410496052","doi":"10.1007/s42439-025-00107-9","title":"A Reflection on Decolonization as a Cultural Process: Evidence from the Canadian Jurisprudence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jus Cogens","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decolonization; Jurisprudence; Reflection (computer programming); Process (computing); Political science; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06163942799497077,"score_gpt":0.4048499140175633,"score_spread":0.3432104860225925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410496052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9174065,0.0007634359,0.000018874518,0.055632807,0.0006805514,0.00060723815,0.000012188783,0.00008929693,0.024789093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99422604,0.00031538223,0.00006305454,0.0020144794,0.0002353456,0.00007604109,0.0000055747155,0.000004063454,0.0030599944],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877626,0.00017843895,0.00013345327,0.00024982396,0.000363841,0.00029816598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897355,0.00037798064,0.00006464085,0.0001195477,0.00036725166,0.000097026306],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027593263,0.0001054352,0.000103580634,0.000030103683,0.003014285,0.00022960381,0.0002981415,0.00011439119,0.00009675198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032167125,0.0000691301,0.00004942367,0.0006725242,0.00022840514,0.00024114319,0.000026679527,0.00016507476,0.00017044613],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015611516,0.00011365393,0.25719526,0.000044262535,0.00034436467,0.00002905168,0.6078203,0.0007058223,0.0010493421,0.023884635,0.0918308,0.0168264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004814796,0.00016037202,0.51693183,0.00091253244,0.00026938398,0.0000012628204,0.077421516,0.00036154728,0.0018762485,0.0066022677,0.39427432,0.00070720236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7474501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9687738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5303988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010469765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006381253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410850843","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5274206","title":"Unity in Canada: Experimental measures of feelings towards people with similar or different views","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03258094649534179,"score_gpt":0.3035498321625428,"score_spread":0.270968885667201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410850843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893467,0.004882706,0.00008107348,0.003655668,0.00014901362,0.00022985284,0.0000021186327,0.000009913627,0.001643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960871,0.0028151616,0.00002483472,0.00009256775,0.00005918968,0.000012293424,6.2035485e-7,0.0000060746706,0.00090216834],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745315,0.00025882758,0.00029938322,0.00014718226,0.00057764334,0.0012638097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994948,0.000072003946,0.00014186172,0.00007457181,0.00014182927,0.00007492884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009058114,0.00015199996,0.00034849317,0.00005181231,0.00050736166,0.000029202316,0.0002969365,0.000048341302,0.00004801019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019706355,0.0000920798,0.00006152744,0.00036281504,0.00011304826,0.00010821183,0.000047649315,0.00080974883,4.3503474e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020110814,0.0012032541,0.6419269,0.00012564012,0.001986297,0.000039053466,0.15599859,0.00037592842,0.0031432312,0.13252996,0.0027751082,0.057884984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003618461,0.0007009764,0.2164901,0.0003349932,0.0001508569,0.000019621992,0.747135,0.00004659708,0.005440714,0.008204238,0.01710396,0.0007544928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9271267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5911364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008100211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012507947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411015651","doi":"10.61959/ltby1168f","title":"Entretien avec Rachel Margolis sur les tendances en matière de divorce au Canada","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.03380913589689765,"score_gpt":0.2787952473053478,"score_spread":0.24498611140845017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411015651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036363367,0.013932834,0.000027797423,0.10190376,0.0049339207,0.0012616145,0.00052102486,0.0002495318,0.8408061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37731987,0.014777535,0.0005749364,0.0005431947,0.006362432,0.00009339665,0.00010936685,0.000061669365,0.6001576],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932058,0.00079667656,0.0009819135,0.0009858225,0.0024524573,0.0015773339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99647206,0.0012328103,0.00066135643,0.0002791802,0.00066968985,0.0006848859],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086755736,0.00086885656,0.0013443929,0.00003624512,0.0017768828,0.00019772626,0.0011167944,0.0007424358,0.006010707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029051963,0.000681272,0.0004553677,0.00055254623,0.00114887,0.00031974932,0.0005786631,0.0009923226,0.0001494313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031447715,0.0001441915,0.2521145,0.0026570552,0.0017442004,0.00042778824,0.33395958,0.000051691815,0.00005760561,0.005510946,0.3297004,0.07360058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017343038,0.000031466705,0.06869372,0.00034797806,0.00026198474,0.000011567786,0.042654347,0.000052985415,0.000043415723,0.00005357175,0.8868264,0.00084915804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9987204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.557126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011694449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008826197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411079892","doi":"10.1093/9780198961109.003.0003","title":"Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council","keywords":"Supreme court; Doctrine; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Charter","score_opus":0.02629445206416738,"score_gpt":0.2785950668315043,"score_spread":0.25230061476733695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411079892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000013301157,0.00058803207,0.0000014639573,0.010924468,0.0006291356,0.00018236847,0.000027642376,0.000057824665,0.98758775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000785031,0.00045675688,0.000070750306,0.001303937,0.00031908875,0.0000040518894,0.000006025643,0.000006091129,0.99704826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990367,0.000012756535,0.00012961197,0.00018162996,0.00043549787,0.00020377028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995262,0.00012083234,0.000053728858,0.00009330944,0.00012933962,0.0000765706],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000080740276,0.00014544101,0.00021127316,0.000013931195,0.00058615685,0.00003273077,0.00021177072,0.00017728737,0.0040547107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097783006,0.00011492256,0.0000720314,0.00001754284,0.00016594554,0.000028550838,0.000079244586,0.00017496067,0.00006753781],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.1013928e-7,4.4582208e-7,0.0000051441134,0.000004258283,0.000030000287,0.0000031494649,0.00026133916,5.344353e-8,4.00956e-8,0.52469313,0.4728872,0.0021149511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026173044,0.0000016489877,0.000030976673,0.000030655297,0.000020276106,2.6611904e-8,0.00041033616,1.6754767e-7,6.3376837e-7,0.002594524,0.99673206,0.00015251174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99298674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99907297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5238449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008772115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001642749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99685574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411238539","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/j7rh9_v1","title":"Bijural Foundations: The Civil Law Tradition’s Role in Shaping Canadian Constitutional Institutions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Constitutional law; Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.11975753597106666,"score_gpt":0.3579448162068785,"score_spread":0.23818728023581187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411238539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025593783,0.00068276917,0.00019607908,0.056931775,0.0015545216,0.001078139,0.00038586263,0.00012027494,0.9364912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939784,0.00019513447,0.00033414792,0.0020976947,0.0003809301,0.0003780433,0.00017509024,0.0000029949222,0.0024576075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982023,0.00024781364,0.00035206668,0.00036190313,0.00039318085,0.0004427084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999035,0.00026754822,0.00008477145,0.0001938376,0.00025498713,0.00016382511],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056552293,0.00020935234,0.00023900079,0.00014211785,0.004274362,0.00041338752,0.00055513054,0.00028555424,0.0006857407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050254824,0.00015977345,0.000152732,0.00039799602,0.0033952196,0.00031233227,0.0001987473,0.0006880179,0.00006455442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.18912e-7,0.00001883064,0.0006914109,0.000010187079,0.000046649213,0.000002028048,0.008679456,0.0010833585,4.6952178e-7,0.9869149,0.002301908,0.00024993072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002050192,0.0000031463912,0.007028957,0.0002519751,0.000048612383,8.089512e-7,0.020451315,0.00028889297,0.0000019383644,0.06587989,0.9054595,0.0003799104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93542516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99593836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99141896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028113376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005996533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411641238","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.6226638","title":"The Law of Parenthood in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.011252754354458145,"score_gpt":0.25628961350383395,"score_spread":0.2450368591493758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411641238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00055896695,0.0319469,0.0000048161523,0.007593075,0.00074191485,0.00029087733,0.00001573439,0.000007975964,0.9588397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44538978,0.06404858,0.0000051566726,0.00010779723,0.00033866937,0.0000049681057,0.0000022299039,0.000013845749,0.49008897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972343,0.000097938326,0.0003956614,0.00014110286,0.000616904,0.0015141247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908686,0.00027173912,0.00031570048,0.00010642402,0.00016371573,0.00005553861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012845884,0.00017346715,0.00031096843,0.000027166752,0.00095824356,0.00003923585,0.00052217155,0.00012391248,0.00004028543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013134892,0.000115564064,0.00013460216,0.00005140853,0.000273807,0.000054769207,0.00006502871,0.0021374922,0.0000028969605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008316146,0.0000031726588,0.00018931655,0.000004141874,0.00016342931,0.0000025478066,0.0006586164,0.0000018455746,3.121563e-7,0.9885645,0.0010221995,0.009381618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020541999,0.000031546195,0.00011536493,0.00013484785,0.000053053616,0.0000032527262,0.020379653,7.420203e-7,0.0000018646427,0.34879288,0.6300898,0.00019155031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96376467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99983287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6397716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00935337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020596832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99444956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411985590","doi":"10.15353/cjds.v12i3.1044","title":"Review of Metanarratives of Disability: Culture, Assumed Authority, and the Normative Social Order","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Disability Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Order (exchange); Sociology; Social order; Gender studies; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.08900392555942586,"score_gpt":0.39388577211127196,"score_spread":0.3048818465518461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411985590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58124423,0.19056807,0.0000035642274,0.22068682,0.0008642054,0.0015908879,0.00022651,0.000026046537,0.0047896192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749741,0.024453659,0.00007948073,0.00019114985,0.00017963532,0.000017534008,0.0000015101451,0.000005682181,0.000097231015],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99677163,0.0013862728,0.0008521271,0.00015840626,0.00049906364,0.00033251834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963985,0.0012397541,0.0004936095,0.00013139771,0.0015312722,0.00020545529],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00442202,0.00017759521,0.0010609477,0.000029674844,0.001243732,0.000028086319,0.0003402761,0.00007101858,0.00004450306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015322749,0.00009974238,0.00030844673,0.00090137875,0.015093577,0.0002854768,0.00009062918,0.00026325183,0.0000015067633],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006379894,0.000081902035,0.09831116,0.0039564795,0.0021039378,0.0000028496504,0.8352841,0.000002456109,0.000007703417,0.02248344,0.032169033,0.005533092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009519709,0.00011842594,0.16891997,0.0015284911,0.0006074646,0.0000016531079,0.78530544,0.0000023215994,0.000024247784,0.012946329,0.029330567,0.0002631543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022681829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.234963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39372987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005138977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033778025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412712941","doi":"10.1163/22116028-90000018a","title":"CANADA: Supreme Court Saskatchewan Federation of Labour et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Saskatchewan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Labour Law Reports Online","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Supreme court; Law; Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.012652461524677968,"score_gpt":0.29437278286917146,"score_spread":0.2817203213444935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412712941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8900878,0.000044359633,0.000005381577,0.10512733,0.00064942084,0.0003947664,0.0003354135,0.000008602014,0.003346955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893072,0.000022404905,0.00022919216,0.0010664081,0.000118499695,0.0000105383215,0.000016478642,0.00000919978,0.009220071],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975728,0.00018154095,0.00072054117,0.00022098082,0.0011168375,0.00018730036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99721366,0.00011540245,0.0013513133,0.00039354357,0.0008849004,0.000041183568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010654717,0.00013491897,0.00028357457,0.000016196498,0.0004943848,0.00006452905,0.000653353,0.000069734,0.00008869649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079944934,0.00008035027,0.0000945634,0.00007165315,0.0006602221,0.00026932854,0.00020328278,0.00020645674,1.7955094e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013110966,0.0011134928,0.76641,0.00014422511,0.0006309068,0.00021079325,0.029942723,0.00071124686,0.005608055,0.18330808,0.010573074,0.0012163138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028365475,0.000016876304,0.6900589,0.00016660808,0.000015622096,0.000004930586,0.005969364,0.000023189916,0.0034098118,0.0016205497,0.29828873,0.00014176725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.982396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99782467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28771564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031999173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019463807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38024583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412788876","doi":"10.1037/cap0000437","title":"The concept of “peoples” in the Canadian Code: Meaning, relevance, and implications for ethical decision making.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Meaning (existential); Code (set theory); Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Management science; Computer science; Philosophy; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.05719902831706223,"score_gpt":0.4117495979913166,"score_spread":0.35455056967425436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412788876","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15952969,0.00506684,0.00017596585,0.72291034,0.002696601,0.0031612196,0.00092883816,0.00005722122,0.10547327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786738,0.00066343043,0.00047430888,0.019485971,0.00007385024,0.0002919598,0.000012980361,0.000010463418,0.00031322936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971115,0.00039213418,0.00047065184,0.0005594547,0.00013064538,0.00133562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99504244,0.0034107887,0.00013799757,0.0005921242,0.00033086556,0.0004857815],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024262113,0.00021013702,0.00030492325,0.0002730744,0.003083749,0.00011523791,0.0012204949,0.00061928923,0.000025225612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006766637,0.00014846835,0.00009095434,0.0010059531,0.002254048,0.000063068816,0.000029218087,0.0007083953,0.000004231648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003758308,0.000014610308,0.020649478,0.000006780808,0.000052234525,0.000008877538,0.018115602,0.000006065296,0.000008368827,0.5838539,0.3183003,0.05894623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043362367,0.00004699459,0.31774956,0.00004825741,0.000020504865,0.000004010532,0.00802444,0.000002705191,5.1978503e-7,0.033442445,0.6400677,0.00015922976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8963079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8191441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001264119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018847816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412824182","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5374631","title":"Litigation Abuse in Ontario Family Law Cases","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Family law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.031037050034962616,"score_gpt":0.3106410992733272,"score_spread":0.2796040492383646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412824182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.938785,0.0060315565,0.00007375688,0.0027490524,0.0013301361,0.00057852775,0.000009600338,0.000074593714,0.050367776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692029,0.011948452,0.00010791645,0.00025079073,0.0004952804,0.00003662831,0.000013519297,0.000010944326,0.017933622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958108,0.00042760544,0.0004809694,0.00036555287,0.0005961747,0.0023188987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990118,0.0001899256,0.0002928105,0.00015917009,0.00024354036,0.00010270993],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022735288,0.0002797054,0.00041917857,0.00010890969,0.0010336249,0.00025755813,0.00055695814,0.00039841072,0.000046356286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002223898,0.0002537071,0.00024119767,0.00018470423,0.0002672353,0.00024227427,0.00017876593,0.006312411,0.000018413632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007363837,0.00016933515,0.02287365,0.000041327374,0.00044432102,0.000053053187,0.12159986,0.00042776132,0.000020037218,0.8488468,0.0004723225,0.0049779136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013140433,0.00017665625,0.028632555,0.0008738565,0.00022598378,0.00004028081,0.106882006,0.000015966398,0.000019644183,0.70916027,0.15149827,0.0011604406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8652257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99589074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15102595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01790135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010457011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412920790","doi":"10.1017/hor.2025.10048","title":"<i>Disability Ethics and Preferential Justice: A Catholic Perspective</i>. By Mary Jo Iozzio. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2023. xii + 122 pages. $32.95 (paper).","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Horizons","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Environmental ethics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Theology; Philosophy; Art; Law; Visual arts","score_opus":0.03032442672571763,"score_gpt":0.30768998797606695,"score_spread":0.27736556125034934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412920790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62425643,0.0136867855,0.00008427385,0.12370476,0.0023542633,0.0022065886,0.0007583293,0.00074472424,0.23220384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9606626,0.012982853,0.00026177117,0.00026041386,0.00036727186,0.000020129582,0.000027748678,0.000016858927,0.025400322],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968079,0.0010352131,0.0002456409,0.0007148924,0.000565861,0.00063052727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998051,0.0009097301,0.00011569327,0.000305468,0.00038405738,0.0002340565],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010222646,0.00029625598,0.0003879805,0.00002505269,0.0037178872,0.00019976842,0.0004932916,0.0004404742,0.00012367996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020881542,0.00028179606,0.00014708602,0.00043942494,0.002001569,0.0005239524,0.00053793465,0.0011759422,0.000014689925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026185665,0.0015938967,0.011098805,0.00056181446,0.00066551875,0.000021449181,0.18416423,0.000009159737,0.0031476005,0.18051066,0.61416847,0.0037965414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000754143,0.00005712929,0.021966415,0.000050732106,0.00042825405,4.898261e-7,0.064471476,0.000010463651,0.0001133867,0.00066445157,0.91108876,0.00039429075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041616894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016580692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3364062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009313261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028626158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413105584","doi":"10.32920/29896178","title":"Legislating a Family Law Culture Shift","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.050306143239519874,"score_gpt":0.35492151654987847,"score_spread":0.3046153733103586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413105584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028808706,0.0017512459,0.00013976483,0.006695218,0.0014571899,0.00071370514,0.000045775567,0.00050663465,0.9858096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7765758,0.00091360975,0.007899365,0.0032987471,0.0016904061,0.00017983449,0.00004015702,0.00001718805,0.20938489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977318,0.00025502904,0.00032734303,0.0005610336,0.00061569246,0.0005090678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990838,0.0001560273,0.00016449568,0.00026124125,0.00021613324,0.00011827436],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047374,0.00031947417,0.00045631247,0.000027450194,0.0016411641,0.000386169,0.00067948725,0.0006304153,0.00018015255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032368104,0.00024112622,0.00029090611,0.00018702305,0.00050685456,0.00014861612,0.0011989529,0.0008779294,0.00007886591],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045284314,0.000038923212,0.0007504876,0.00012444913,0.00019802581,0.000005372798,0.17054212,0.000061202205,0.000016203117,0.7954404,0.030803854,0.0020144626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001502261,0.000008511062,0.0014731286,0.00025937872,0.00007175704,4.2977785e-8,0.028599601,0.000023777588,0.000015364563,0.01578279,0.9531066,0.0005088466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16414337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057790957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9223027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039115304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022695269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413105585","doi":"10.32920/29896178.v1","title":"Legislating a Family Law Culture Shift","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.050306143239519874,"score_gpt":0.35492151654987847,"score_spread":0.3046153733103586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413105585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028808706,0.0017512459,0.00013976483,0.006695218,0.0014571899,0.00071370514,0.000045775567,0.00050663465,0.9858096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7765758,0.00091360975,0.007899365,0.0032987471,0.0016904061,0.00017983449,0.00004015702,0.00001718805,0.20938489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977318,0.00025502904,0.00032734303,0.0005610336,0.00061569246,0.0005090678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990838,0.0001560273,0.00016449568,0.00026124125,0.00021613324,0.00011827436],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047374,0.00031947417,0.00045631247,0.000027450194,0.0016411641,0.000386169,0.00067948725,0.0006304153,0.00018015255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032368104,0.00024112622,0.00029090611,0.00018702305,0.00050685456,0.00014861612,0.0011989529,0.0008779294,0.00007886591],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045284314,0.000038923212,0.0007504876,0.00012444913,0.00019802581,0.000005372798,0.17054212,0.000061202205,0.000016203117,0.7954404,0.030803854,0.0020144626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001502261,0.000008511062,0.0014731286,0.00025937872,0.00007175704,4.2977785e-8,0.028599601,0.000023777588,0.000015364563,0.01578279,0.9531066,0.0005088466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16414337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057790957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9223027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039115304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022695269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413185860","doi":"10.32920/29896847.v1","title":"Tracing the Grounds for Divorce: A Feminist Critique of Canadian Family Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Tracing; Law; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.06137874697865322,"score_gpt":0.35843788373909846,"score_spread":0.29705913676044526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413185860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059287404,0.0008389155,0.00018016143,0.027601732,0.0010796845,0.0016125295,0.00039146224,0.00007556505,0.9622912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97227323,0.00027061018,0.0010540482,0.003780056,0.00035211988,0.00034389916,0.000016678943,0.000009072846,0.021900311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984113,0.00016317103,0.000331633,0.0003256904,0.00030480055,0.0004634029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985133,0.000656213,0.000121445555,0.00023106697,0.0003372603,0.00014074745],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008691111,0.000205409,0.00037851607,0.00008007219,0.0019498005,0.00019751598,0.0006982185,0.00035911924,0.00003399903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040030552,0.00013861836,0.0002781877,0.00026673652,0.0008135397,0.000055247412,0.00024582338,0.0003719944,0.000002254222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060472207,0.000017367567,0.00017761215,0.00023904318,0.00014428397,0.0000010426721,0.061672807,0.000023333254,0.000010611799,0.9148462,0.021738522,0.0011231488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016747779,0.000020375532,0.001250394,0.00027881117,0.00012645558,1.06996396e-7,0.11707147,0.00004257214,0.00008701641,0.013452961,0.867126,0.0003763517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98159266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98334396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9663445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048425343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007742627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413185879","doi":"10.32920/29896847","title":"Tracing the Grounds for Divorce: A Feminist Critique of Canadian Family Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Tracing; Law; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06137874697865322,"score_gpt":0.35843788373909846,"score_spread":0.29705913676044526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413185879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059287404,0.0008389155,0.00018016143,0.027601732,0.0010796845,0.0016125295,0.00039146224,0.00007556505,0.9622912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97227323,0.00027061018,0.0010540482,0.003780056,0.00035211988,0.00034389916,0.000016678943,0.000009072846,0.021900311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984113,0.00016317103,0.000331633,0.0003256904,0.00030480055,0.0004634029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985133,0.000656213,0.000121445555,0.00023106697,0.0003372603,0.00014074745],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008691111,0.000205409,0.00037851607,0.00008007219,0.0019498005,0.00019751598,0.0006982185,0.00035911924,0.00003399903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040030552,0.00013861836,0.0002781877,0.00026673652,0.0008135397,0.000055247412,0.00024582338,0.0003719944,0.000002254222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060472207,0.000017367567,0.00017761215,0.00023904318,0.00014428397,0.0000010426721,0.061672807,0.000023333254,0.000010611799,0.9148462,0.021738522,0.0011231488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016747779,0.000020375532,0.001250394,0.00027881117,0.00012645558,1.06996396e-7,0.11707147,0.00004257214,0.00008701641,0.013452961,0.867126,0.0003763517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98159266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98334396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9663445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048425343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007742627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413185900","doi":"10.32920/29896214","title":"BC Court of Appeal Recognizes the Myth of False Allegations of Intimate Partner Violence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Mythology; Criminology; Law; Domestic violence; False accusation; Political science; Psychology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Art; Medicine; Medical emergency; Literature","score_opus":0.04732247026385317,"score_gpt":0.3585395966505537,"score_spread":0.3112171263867005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413185900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35398987,0.0045855492,0.0013964443,0.058052845,0.0025222164,0.0050987946,0.0008866677,0.00026550546,0.5732021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98924035,0.0034991694,0.002584726,0.0001261632,0.00008284451,0.00007848224,0.0000125626775,0.00000502829,0.004370659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801785,0.00030413328,0.00063735165,0.00026593593,0.00054843136,0.00022631392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976909,0.0005640789,0.0006091202,0.00029956913,0.0007937448,0.00004259157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091459195,0.00018060885,0.00055226975,0.000043982945,0.00030003733,0.000022080138,0.00069099077,0.00021476272,0.0002046356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078697223,0.000110594774,0.0002516173,0.00020658642,0.001277259,0.0000668705,0.0007244992,0.00028112208,0.000006657908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017879023,0.0011026975,0.025351565,0.00352337,0.0034273765,0.0000020798605,0.3072177,0.0029741712,0.0010427801,0.5219098,0.07796484,0.055304836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002753828,0.00037145082,0.11272009,0.013901489,0.0027662069,7.708623e-7,0.40466157,0.0022395554,0.037545882,0.20903127,0.21065257,0.00335531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045193963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044337404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6352505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006773679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025898236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9611642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413185908","doi":"10.32920/29896211.v1","title":"Torts and Family Violence: Ahluwalia v Ahluwalia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering","score_opus":0.037682647159815306,"score_gpt":0.34701694719423426,"score_spread":0.309334300034419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413185908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37913007,0.0108629195,0.00014531118,0.010386737,0.0072619715,0.0021945597,0.00015796642,0.0008709807,0.5889895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87517834,0.01717365,0.0025992964,0.0014524289,0.0011770432,0.0002230436,0.000031178093,0.000020062174,0.10214496],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739426,0.00025937596,0.00038024166,0.00075551885,0.00065606006,0.0005545558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988608,0.0001778566,0.00016159134,0.000310434,0.00027946263,0.00020989138],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005982481,0.00037782124,0.00054643315,0.00006285384,0.0010554686,0.00030727193,0.0005325915,0.00060451194,0.0003097576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036857885,0.00030690376,0.00018027579,0.0001880673,0.000691314,0.00012812506,0.0014323118,0.0005888362,0.000054816497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007193795,0.0003406133,0.09406929,0.001345309,0.0013735841,0.000073080926,0.16141197,0.00007052237,0.00021479953,0.265938,0.32499337,0.15009752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006248961,0.00004823675,0.1554789,0.0019217912,0.00036113127,6.2841866e-7,0.04957778,0.000085570515,0.000118714466,0.040815428,0.7488534,0.0021135765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.093252115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071308785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49604827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037807244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027861723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413185922","doi":"10.32920/29896211","title":"Torts and Family Violence: Ahluwalia v Ahluwalia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering","score_opus":0.037682647159815306,"score_gpt":0.34701694719423426,"score_spread":0.309334300034419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413185922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37913007,0.0108629195,0.00014531118,0.010386737,0.0072619715,0.0021945597,0.00015796642,0.0008709807,0.5889895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87517834,0.01717365,0.0025992964,0.0014524289,0.0011770432,0.0002230436,0.000031178093,0.000020062174,0.10214496],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739426,0.00025937596,0.00038024166,0.00075551885,0.00065606006,0.0005545558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988608,0.0001778566,0.00016159134,0.000310434,0.00027946263,0.00020989138],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005982481,0.00037782124,0.00054643315,0.00006285384,0.0010554686,0.00030727193,0.0005325915,0.00060451194,0.0003097576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036857885,0.00030690376,0.00018027579,0.0001880673,0.000691314,0.00012812506,0.0014323118,0.0005888362,0.000054816497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007193795,0.0003406133,0.09406929,0.001345309,0.0013735841,0.000073080926,0.16141197,0.00007052237,0.00021479953,0.265938,0.32499337,0.15009752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006248961,0.00004823675,0.1554789,0.0019217912,0.00036113127,6.2841866e-7,0.04957778,0.000085570515,0.000118714466,0.040815428,0.7488534,0.0021135765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.093252115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071308785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49604827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037807244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027861723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413186145","doi":"10.32920/29896214.v1","title":"BC Court of Appeal Recognizes the Myth of False Allegations of Intimate Partner Violence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Mythology; Criminology; Domestic violence; Law; Political science; Psychology; Art; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency; Literature","score_opus":0.04732247026385317,"score_gpt":0.3585395966505537,"score_spread":0.3112171263867005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413186145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35398987,0.0045855492,0.0013964443,0.058052845,0.0025222164,0.0050987946,0.0008866677,0.00026550546,0.5732021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98924035,0.0034991694,0.002584726,0.0001261632,0.00008284451,0.00007848224,0.0000125626775,0.00000502829,0.004370659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801785,0.00030413328,0.00063735165,0.00026593593,0.00054843136,0.00022631392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976909,0.0005640789,0.0006091202,0.00029956913,0.0007937448,0.00004259157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091459195,0.00018060885,0.00055226975,0.000043982945,0.00030003733,0.000022080138,0.00069099077,0.00021476272,0.0002046356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078697223,0.000110594774,0.0002516173,0.00020658642,0.001277259,0.0000668705,0.0007244992,0.00028112208,0.000006657908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017879023,0.0011026975,0.025351565,0.00352337,0.0034273765,0.0000020798605,0.3072177,0.0029741712,0.0010427801,0.5219098,0.07796484,0.055304836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002753828,0.00037145082,0.11272009,0.013901489,0.0027662069,7.708623e-7,0.40466157,0.0022395554,0.037545882,0.20903127,0.21065257,0.00335531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045193963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044337404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6352505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006773679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025898236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9611642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413465306","doi":"10.29173/mlj1388","title":"Sentencing in Line with Society: R v Bunn and the Manitoba Court of Appeal’s Use of Social Understanding as a Justification for Increased Sentences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Appeal to emotion; Line (geometry); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.07751467632614194,"score_gpt":0.314021018160506,"score_spread":0.23650634183436403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413465306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98264766,0.0002640381,0.0027321556,0.012601116,0.00018238137,0.00071800366,0.000011549096,0.00001562924,0.0008274986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985639,0.0002476644,0.00077564217,0.00018955937,0.00017605988,0.00001494292,0.0000017674566,0.0000057629522,0.000024715473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986349,0.00023027482,0.0003768323,0.00013688074,0.00038464222,0.0002364963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985947,0.0006320148,0.0003639567,0.00005394933,0.00031603445,0.000039347306],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013443354,0.00011392108,0.00029815646,0.00004117256,0.001668656,0.00014560255,0.00015903008,0.0000754116,0.0000033706874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002764671,0.00007166507,0.00011631682,0.00025657588,0.0012609746,0.0002573236,0.000047474776,0.00020234361,1.9528117e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018894915,0.00028302005,0.06066885,0.00047441488,0.0009781996,0.000008525317,0.117124744,0.00013551464,0.0013986282,0.8100367,0.0022619404,0.004739926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002408398,0.00006167779,0.009973156,0.00027783407,0.00019243931,0.0000049807945,0.97533673,0.0005005851,0.00016655817,0.009754598,0.0012008981,0.0001221328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1462376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4974295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.858212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004024144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010726224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413469171","doi":"10.29173/mlj1371","title":"Interview with the Honourable Richard J.F. Chartier","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03245803128657719,"score_gpt":0.29075608973625267,"score_spread":0.25829805844967546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413469171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23029938,0.0067996955,0.00062798685,0.33003473,0.0022904747,0.00076318806,0.0000041504677,0.00015958537,0.42902082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99086386,0.0005155904,0.00015123574,0.004364301,0.0006352076,0.000019718242,3.1331686e-7,0.00000752609,0.003442259],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862814,0.00033512115,0.00016894704,0.00012202702,0.00037782083,0.0003679446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937695,0.0001001641,0.000106302636,0.00010748988,0.00022675405,0.000082316175],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000986443,0.00011865351,0.00017555883,0.000020847516,0.003995012,0.00043808937,0.00042973485,0.000048705817,0.00022545402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006115997,0.00006010328,0.00009461102,0.0002469674,0.00045805963,0.00025871414,0.0000798249,0.00038718703,0.000090399255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105058105,0.00022843428,0.009135362,0.000082487844,0.0011321009,0.00010419583,0.053986084,0.000045856203,0.00011800915,0.2972842,0.47369593,0.16408227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002168526,0.000028001006,0.0038644278,0.00008400521,0.000048810518,0.0000068920176,0.09679426,0.0000026739126,0.000040561827,0.0010460377,0.8977687,0.00009876761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01331253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22452502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76056445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024883533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005192541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99730164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413594117","doi":"10.64628/aa.ayy39hvkw","title":"Unintended, but not unanticipated: coercive control laws will disadvantage First Nations women","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Unintended consequences; Control (management); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.03420607043499752,"score_gpt":0.33581971188662935,"score_spread":0.30161364145163183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413594117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2862821,0.00087393355,0.0008205099,0.09566533,0.0076331943,0.0073172553,0.0038467557,0.0020722866,0.59548867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9468251,0.0013444935,0.00021006617,0.0007454706,0.00036823787,0.0012548792,0.000099383215,0.000036815472,0.04911559],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591327,0.0005220836,0.0005650608,0.0008014434,0.0011755329,0.0010226361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974002,0.0010684707,0.0003705637,0.00040987495,0.00042565784,0.00032522352],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090502814,0.00047043394,0.000782011,0.00013350707,0.004718906,0.00028655978,0.0010546274,0.00035184805,0.0078563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018892161,0.00039332724,0.000313992,0.00040289084,0.0012537831,0.00029608785,0.0014207711,0.0010432914,0.00013989575],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002834059,0.0009252572,0.016768659,0.0004930936,0.0025212415,0.00014647767,0.48684755,0.0046957475,0.00009628908,0.46989623,0.01619558,0.0011304816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013208609,0.00008371291,0.007569422,0.000099383105,0.00020358256,8.2968126e-7,0.27728757,0.00029144494,0.000027188531,0.0027159983,0.7091827,0.0012173138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06932604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0999325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6929871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00271869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030870092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413802924","doi":"10.29173/mlj1460","title":"Interview with Greg Evans","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer graphics (images); Computer science","score_opus":0.05154963808109951,"score_gpt":0.31978971325719185,"score_spread":0.26824007517609233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413802924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2995934,0.03056306,0.0010972769,0.117298625,0.007690546,0.00085465884,0.000015881953,0.00087224954,0.5420143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957206,0.000732412,0.0003875462,0.0006168264,0.0016441415,0.0000071751565,5.478055e-7,0.000014682974,0.0008760578],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986659,0.00020255553,0.00017031243,0.00014555996,0.00048168327,0.0003339715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953675,0.00008028391,0.000045202654,0.00006384566,0.0001268717,0.00014704428],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006804004,0.00011932804,0.00014811216,0.000025478332,0.0015710677,0.0007372609,0.00024562993,0.000051754818,0.00044949108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038139373,0.000072873576,0.00010575616,0.00018706797,0.00035225519,0.0004282585,0.000047152138,0.00038692154,0.0003213801],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038419148,0.00012599136,0.0019965724,0.00022130771,0.00088819215,0.0014941826,0.07845236,0.000020822794,0.00009307524,0.37865368,0.07793429,0.4600811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010774138,0.000058686663,0.0008034168,0.00027885707,0.00005156139,0.00007493294,0.06187043,0.000008324842,0.000016069245,0.00182073,0.93476486,0.00014441057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014953196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3384476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85683054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000329524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004891149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803175","doi":"10.29173/mlj1490","title":"Hybridity and Precarious Personhood: Limited Partnerships and Indigenous Economic Development","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Harvard Kennedy School","keywords":"Personhood; Indigenous; General partnership; Colonialism; Context (archaeology); Political science; Intellectual property; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Law; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.05191443147606321,"score_gpt":0.2899043652330947,"score_spread":0.2379899337570315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98752207,0.0019620277,0.00001011628,0.0024989021,0.0004414826,0.00021710909,0.000002209907,0.0000396538,0.007306451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99821806,0.0006571462,0.0003589148,0.0002340452,0.00027548498,0.000008556972,9.861661e-7,0.0000055588225,0.00024124865],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988969,0.00016666178,0.00021995182,0.00018635775,0.00017218124,0.0003579331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995064,0.00011187917,0.0000987761,0.000052727846,0.00006356195,0.00016662396],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060806266,0.00013379793,0.00019385401,0.000040000243,0.0037853364,0.00042975476,0.0001428967,0.00007901044,0.000023805882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074343734,0.00011381145,0.000037600566,0.0000550761,0.00035113114,0.00020524394,0.00010392859,0.00026999178,0.00001316115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010392084,0.00016817325,0.2685769,0.000104683895,0.0009116126,0.00010982535,0.37567347,0.00000956456,0.000069567795,0.032140955,0.005034752,0.3170966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009781655,0.00006145799,0.1838635,0.00009544121,0.000099113655,0.0000464071,0.21771935,0.00001700131,0.00020924567,0.0018098059,0.59464234,0.00045815972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021399865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5039373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5896076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005673436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014932388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413834081","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198979937.003.0064","title":"Re Resolution to Amend the Constitution of Canada [1981] 1 SCR 753, Supreme Court of Canada (also known as the Patriation Reference )","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Supreme court; Resolution (logic); Law; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.032225902120052566,"score_gpt":0.23912455451410258,"score_spread":0.20689865239405003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413834081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00079006865,0.00013932111,0.000023229513,0.0029172876,0.00033827644,0.0008624348,0.00046680385,0.000017167971,0.9944454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19215879,0.00046844268,0.00003434781,0.00013746104,0.00007978112,0.000002396794,0.00002326691,0.0000058025885,0.8070897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982075,0.00017188866,0.0002571624,0.00025785502,0.0008274803,0.00027812042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982449,0.00032899002,0.000414675,0.00028977043,0.00062799343,0.000093703355],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035610862,0.00019965997,0.0003152981,0.000037513393,0.0014594095,0.000022362194,0.0006326671,0.00019078495,0.000039080496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018296928,0.00014802486,0.00007995722,0.00003783607,0.00061910145,0.00006850541,0.00021702246,0.0002879571,1.0690514e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009854002,0.000003736148,0.00001627024,0.000043570715,0.00015845713,0.0000053952494,0.0040643327,0.000119643526,0.000012044539,0.9418727,0.05280428,0.0008010296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015043747,0.000021936698,0.0001256304,0.00017268119,0.00014284467,1.2823622e-7,0.005141368,0.000012516942,0.00006653198,0.00027594878,0.9937313,0.00015865765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9925625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99850893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94159675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017034758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041893865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414593760","doi":"10.18357/jcs501202522466","title":"Childhood and the Law: A Review of Childhood and the Law in Canada: The Family/State Relationship by Patrick Joseph Ryan","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Childhood Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Common law; Family law; Public law","score_opus":0.015240892437582271,"score_gpt":0.2823569469190142,"score_spread":0.26711605448143194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414593760","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22737378,0.61021906,0.0000012812158,0.15483908,0.00029503217,0.0011332268,0.000023931581,0.000008429547,0.0061061573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7816015,0.21287616,0.00002042344,0.005288778,0.000106179425,0.000024958952,4.7048346e-7,0.000007333825,0.000074219875],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618274,0.0014059577,0.0010616303,0.00020296355,0.00078397326,0.00036274816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99511534,0.0033750287,0.0008363444,0.00020133785,0.00040004976,0.000071906354],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038070048,0.00026505877,0.0010079297,0.000040400955,0.002111432,0.00008189984,0.0005052767,0.000054112235,0.0000029113546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003146957,0.00011167313,0.00021399665,0.0005771373,0.0022622384,0.00022566531,0.00027229005,0.00074623065,4.6011846e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002322427,0.0004006265,0.04626113,0.000827495,0.004314237,0.00001480015,0.5245069,0.000025877338,0.0000024135386,0.33349395,0.08182309,0.008097234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0063334797,0.00006795612,0.8085604,0.0038305437,0.00079787587,0.0000148401095,0.12099848,0.0000014858036,0.000006113099,0.02256833,0.036525737,0.0002947612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36486185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6128229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7622993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002733846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053542136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414901790","doi":"10.1177/1037969x251385771","title":"When reform kills: The implications of bail reform for First Nations women in Victoria, Australia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternative Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Government (linguistics); Population; Law reform; Project commissioning","score_opus":0.045779454421895384,"score_gpt":0.36942972441256067,"score_spread":0.32365026999066526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414901790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3798107,0.00039808903,0.00066946243,0.1440327,0.0026343518,0.0018152056,0.00016477949,0.000048139158,0.4704266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940645,0.0003178036,0.00038011576,0.00015008358,0.0003695016,0.00017130232,0.0000021960877,0.0000047881335,0.0045396765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872327,0.000097632335,0.0004071622,0.00012991125,0.00026339322,0.00037861554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985832,0.00046342786,0.00026581154,0.0001143996,0.0004962893,0.000076877855],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011626024,0.00010001587,0.00018667312,0.000071129885,0.0023784223,0.00009352473,0.00052447675,0.000057559206,0.0001049503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005516426,0.00006176733,0.000101885664,0.0003244995,0.00039963372,0.00034288244,0.00007054452,0.00022185575,0.0000047679687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017754102,0.000058874703,0.0035776293,0.000012088154,0.00015052258,4.098002e-7,0.056581922,0.00001771525,0.000029173749,0.9381664,0.0008701973,0.00051732734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010565895,0.00007863299,0.057985954,0.00015847552,0.000036059966,0.0000014869003,0.0641802,0.000012853883,0.00026619658,0.2201057,0.6559357,0.00018214597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043711975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33767104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7180607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003282895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008269603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416019431","doi":"10.21991/cf29505","title":"The Charter’s Forgotten Weapon: Reclaiming Section 28 For Trans Equality","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Identity (music); Legislature; Face (sociological concept); Constitutional law; Constitutional right","score_opus":0.04191491100674879,"score_gpt":0.3275828716107907,"score_spread":0.2856679606040419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416019431","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032598206,0.014669733,0.40756762,0.32277307,0.043208856,0.008989656,0.002077398,0.00067534053,0.1967785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98199064,0.0023242366,0.00071054377,0.0025083404,0.001449072,0.0012382815,0.0001737983,0.00002273075,0.009582345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99209464,0.00060495036,0.001987164,0.0014682186,0.0012483933,0.0025966652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99378276,0.0026593725,0.00070589234,0.0006906288,0.0017173394,0.0004440378],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029491675,0.0009967395,0.0010463957,0.0002469232,0.037398074,0.0009864994,0.0012730537,0.00093936245,0.00019794378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028701732,0.0008092914,0.0013431335,0.0014081541,0.024301067,0.0015843357,0.00038821483,0.0009811679,0.000095168536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038452802,0.00020891537,0.0032953767,0.00015278332,0.0007811963,0.0000033502693,0.0016906834,0.00028099932,0.00024653945,0.94365454,0.039628636,0.009672435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027471532,0.00012865425,0.0007784867,0.00063341483,0.00052666967,0.000020718062,0.033962473,0.0013150693,0.0002452833,0.046457723,0.9122004,0.0009839607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001371666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006267044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97873086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023826028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004420421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416578883","doi":"10.3366/tal.2025.0625","title":"Old English Psalter Glosses to the Latin Lemmas <i>incola</i> and <i>incolatus</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Translation and Literature","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Jerome's University","funders":"","keywords":"Old English; Variety (cybernetics); Subject (documents); Noun","score_opus":0.017262938701102452,"score_gpt":0.29096714340503455,"score_spread":0.2737042047039321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416578883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.525784,0.043579303,0.0003560348,0.2448719,0.0020391385,0.0031226452,0.00017833184,0.00048517121,0.17958349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864784,0.0006753769,0.0006979865,0.004943278,0.00041457647,0.0000335264,0.000011384698,0.0000058969454,0.0067395926],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911636,0.00013918773,0.00014790332,0.00021781489,0.00018146545,0.00019724207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946314,0.00020124335,0.00002791983,0.00008596067,0.0001408127,0.00008091808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029887955,0.0001240832,0.00013651351,0.00003366493,0.00094502745,0.00044606946,0.000097850556,0.00012431825,0.000020726437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010939474,0.00007993882,0.000038996972,0.00046846695,0.00013853898,0.00024928898,0.000023864503,0.0002020916,0.0000028565373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010104629,0.00004545865,0.017260285,0.00011896343,0.00008165381,0.0000036901638,0.80855334,0.000015455491,0.00032965004,0.079158425,0.032931093,0.061400957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031938244,0.000015403199,0.015258403,0.000095710966,0.000024513547,2.0311475e-7,0.0039971983,0.000022636632,0.000030827683,0.00041720617,0.97969997,0.0001185717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032257644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025065765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9467688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022279468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022810653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72684824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416889372","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5811862","title":"Constitutional Statutes are 'Always Speaking'","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Statutory interpretation; Statutory law; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional law","score_opus":0.02643328226768535,"score_gpt":0.3234745874112813,"score_spread":0.29704130514359595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416889372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12740664,0.13430522,0.01896149,0.093164004,0.021681538,0.0039825337,0.00076547236,0.0012543027,0.5984788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94934565,0.03460242,0.0004023701,0.00026958177,0.0026256172,0.00003335017,0.00002355591,0.000010921142,0.012686524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99465895,0.0003967316,0.00047538985,0.00044727215,0.0009242249,0.0030974601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826664,0.00021955547,0.00058566977,0.000182701,0.00058408646,0.00016136863],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026089977,0.0003625755,0.00051796477,0.00008807592,0.0025422159,0.000349372,0.00086180854,0.0004187563,0.00016602337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096226303,0.00031131704,0.00040136732,0.00021722863,0.0013984722,0.00021268231,0.00048407514,0.0057961373,0.000052799853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002180573,0.00006030832,0.004491712,0.000031608524,0.0006287191,0.000009268953,0.00462067,0.00022023886,0.0000029155703,0.9818609,0.001854312,0.0061975736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006182007,0.00005082367,0.0022605679,0.00050196087,0.00024384327,0.000029600113,0.052795764,0.000016850312,0.000009680434,0.5505164,0.3921846,0.0007717255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055434736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039143555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.821939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006742397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012214108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416942283","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5740482","title":"Mapping the Limitations of the Notwithstanding Clause: The Primary Documents.ca Drafting History for Section 33 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Opposition (politics); Negotiation; Government (linguistics); Sovereignty","score_opus":0.04144710157014613,"score_gpt":0.27014862729606987,"score_spread":0.22870152572592373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416942283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83046746,0.034393698,0.001316034,0.06731762,0.009763594,0.0066726883,0.0002106401,0.000037184414,0.04982108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949028,0.0016526134,0.000039901457,0.000090631125,0.00034244434,0.000033064698,0.0000014732968,0.00000677316,0.0029303292],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977522,0.0004454317,0.0004285076,0.00016045832,0.00046617808,0.00074724416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980462,0.0005457673,0.00082553754,0.00020990423,0.00033535715,0.00003721963],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027137655,0.00015202853,0.00025489146,0.00006501254,0.0028860858,0.000048732483,0.0007122615,0.00015489053,0.000006580679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041244467,0.00006785076,0.00026768234,0.00019385804,0.00083021243,0.00009448893,0.00019126426,0.001681671,1.0128185e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008459787,0.00008684122,0.01582155,0.00035097296,0.0034510335,2.9501842e-7,0.6663907,0.00069002074,0.0012542539,0.2963794,0.0061998395,0.009290513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017723122,0.00018848368,0.07476975,0.0021171551,0.0013446403,0.000019195442,0.18705706,0.00030842132,0.0003153396,0.3406124,0.39071274,0.0007824946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22387491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8313941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6075192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055092424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045358352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416970814","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5700162","title":"The Drafting History of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislation; Bill of rights; Human rights; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.012259553868012918,"score_gpt":0.2489789977643971,"score_spread":0.2367194438963842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416970814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46528962,0.31435516,0.000054272572,0.050305255,0.01832419,0.0031911077,0.00008749878,0.00003301105,0.14835986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94986606,0.016565971,0.000011814664,0.000061033592,0.0005184823,0.000011510712,5.461849e-7,0.0000095444575,0.03295505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940716,0.00087443105,0.00092492456,0.00036494224,0.00090821274,0.002855871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970328,0.00042029217,0.0013475331,0.0003521348,0.00064458966,0.00020263363],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051086536,0.00037328433,0.0006221117,0.0000901316,0.0045781285,0.00010132374,0.0015715198,0.0004029049,0.000044469165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004148014,0.00020054067,0.0005089943,0.00023995072,0.0032773789,0.00012994788,0.00045163545,0.0051473207,0.000002145567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008871982,0.00010032722,0.010924357,0.00017041976,0.0040663797,0.0000021583596,0.36958143,0.0000695457,0.00014515736,0.58245736,0.0034225106,0.028971631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012929077,0.0002664588,0.014361647,0.0013069592,0.0010484162,0.000041275704,0.07826331,0.00017035473,0.000089004236,0.37986314,0.5222797,0.0010168579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80926067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9863627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5188572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01714145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025074065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416989084","doi":"10.1515/9781779400673-022","title":"On the Illegitimacy of the Canadian Constitutional Order","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Regina Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Constitution; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.03809268504480884,"score_gpt":0.23557727935119926,"score_spread":0.19748459430639043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416989084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026455254,0.00021005588,0.0000145308095,0.022014245,0.00047862725,0.0010881912,0.0003314323,0.000013151428,0.9755852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23772617,0.00036047024,0.000054135064,0.0002134154,0.000056004337,7.5381115e-7,0.0000034921927,0.000006209133,0.76157933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980473,0.00020845597,0.00016292196,0.00037915414,0.0008241756,0.0003779902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973096,0.0006068253,0.0005219719,0.0004619217,0.00094708614,0.00015259023],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028920342,0.00033246557,0.0004781132,0.00008377018,0.004180542,0.000034876935,0.0014595855,0.00040142832,0.0003776858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002424528,0.00023190626,0.0004239078,0.000046995996,0.01812266,0.00006143453,0.00043971092,0.00059922,0.000009145124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032975444,0.000008709451,0.000026109083,0.000046454286,0.0003393947,0.000007455374,0.00689442,0.000025647256,0.0000015258566,0.969602,0.022354143,0.0006611535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031465606,0.000027532335,0.00010248305,0.000641142,0.00026427154,5.790711e-7,0.0029510218,0.000017586906,0.000024539182,0.0021945238,0.99322,0.00024166357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54882073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49797347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97086585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064694963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020128451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99711585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416998280","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5817042","title":"The Challenge of Relocation Applications under the New Divorce Act for Mothers and Victims of Family Violence: A Critical Comment on Friesen v Friesen (Saskatchewan Court of Appeal)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Context (archaeology); Child custody; Best interests; Family law","score_opus":0.023216592721652437,"score_gpt":0.3411031756190445,"score_spread":0.3178865828973921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416998280","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04146939,0.09034677,0.11599867,0.7347483,0.0009345693,0.0082068015,0.00021177722,0.0000819139,0.0080018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94675,0.05213914,0.0001777146,0.00017391202,0.00022281158,0.0001357898,0.000003808843,0.000011490803,0.0003853249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975091,0.00030957448,0.0005524809,0.00024276004,0.00057504216,0.00081104145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971151,0.0014778665,0.0005556066,0.00028536757,0.0004960221,0.00007007402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024386016,0.00020079841,0.00039285177,0.00004136614,0.0011899173,0.000051758998,0.0006984424,0.00021100453,0.000002931662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031635963,0.00012086474,0.0002019841,0.0001490768,0.0010616147,0.000053169493,0.00020049182,0.0013138801,3.2374112e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015373813,0.00015929465,0.00015166044,0.00017137054,0.0007747373,3.495205e-8,0.03913133,0.00027879697,0.000054570453,0.9202221,0.0006781467,0.03822422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004568325,0.0002885943,0.00097116653,0.00056290824,0.00024771696,6.3354554e-7,0.34502345,0.000109524684,0.00007508642,0.6345864,0.017486105,0.00019161461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073217098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009696139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9052806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080598606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029886954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417194340","doi":"10.7202/1119727ar","title":"The Fight for Substantive Equality: Women's Activism and Section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Section (typography); Principal (computer security); Bill of rights; Ex post facto law; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.10497055886347433,"score_gpt":0.3857010617955144,"score_spread":0.28073050293204005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417194340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9410672,0.011445241,0.00004724554,0.019396372,0.0043802448,0.0021017534,0.00017893461,0.00004239348,0.021340623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982969,0.0004215181,0.000059682527,0.00024061355,0.0005937595,0.00009949282,0.0000012237566,0.000006500428,0.00028027702],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815524,0.0003891391,0.00028001517,0.00023702913,0.00043584278,0.0005027609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802643,0.0009437923,0.00010160718,0.000075964264,0.00071152375,0.0001406563],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093134696,0.00016131617,0.0003579365,0.000017505297,0.0028153604,0.000058453366,0.0001747281,0.00018670277,0.0000025467361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025519887,0.000088040266,0.00006596022,0.00024428449,0.003124037,0.00015517163,0.000115823845,0.00023564618,3.8403925e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006136145,0.00004479929,0.0021660714,0.0002142972,0.00027526115,0.0000022833212,0.72793347,4.0897288e-7,0.00008243973,0.2568768,0.011825036,0.00051779737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010000208,0.00010876257,0.028299516,0.00007781873,0.0004055362,0.0000020868158,0.7635865,0.000010402059,0.00010140843,0.03351415,0.17256191,0.00033185905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048787307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40627238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3574851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004157145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009318413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417283522","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5895562","title":"Critical Conversations in Canadian Public Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; York University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Public law; Scholarship; Indigenous; Critical legal studies; Queer; Bridging (networking); Critical race theory; Law reform","score_opus":0.02809084947294429,"score_gpt":0.33848258670255627,"score_spread":0.310391737229612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417283522","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030946787,0.015561868,0.0002697924,0.5798768,0.004704635,0.0011583674,0.00011045289,0.00015931095,0.367212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98961633,0.00542343,0.00006239737,0.00055491296,0.00054828316,0.000029759594,0.000009998623,0.000008686765,0.0037462106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99424434,0.00049748423,0.0003559168,0.00030116495,0.00045032232,0.004150775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868757,0.0002462256,0.00009613947,0.00014186476,0.00041172584,0.00041650012],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030687104,0.00020739931,0.00031667916,0.00022113461,0.0018937071,0.00042859206,0.00066677004,0.00041933655,0.00016793488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001976835,0.00020076547,0.00018110988,0.00029954244,0.0005518518,0.0002700033,0.00017189322,0.0052375873,0.000034858178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019112206,0.000020900014,0.0030085777,0.000009341554,0.0000919629,0.000005297091,0.004400376,0.000008505313,2.8541146e-7,0.99107623,0.00034645936,0.0010301726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031303245,0.000026802303,0.0015711603,0.00011600539,0.00006597263,0.00000780408,0.037209127,0.000041149855,8.732852e-7,0.6577299,0.30248713,0.00043100916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9222922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95866954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017326519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03446742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W49242073","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal Rights: Creating Disincentives to Negotiate: Mitchell v. M.N.R.'S Potential Effect on Dispute Resolution","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Negotiation; Treaty; Context (archaeology); Justiciability; Duty; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.0060738624323630665,"score_gpt":0.2947476599063553,"score_spread":0.28867379747399224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W49242073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9769034,0.0016388221,0.001736006,0.00183628,0.0008836242,0.00047653622,0.0000031356399,0.0000885849,0.016433647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99312764,0.0011960487,0.00018136116,0.00007942361,0.00089838647,0.000014577978,0.0000020635257,0.000018037226,0.0044824327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946674,0.00099353,0.0003174721,0.000360855,0.0008051409,0.0028555715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990812,0.0001825592,0.0001944221,0.00012488062,0.00015913365,0.00025780563],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027796046,0.00027052872,0.00029830018,0.00008486963,0.0032966703,0.00024116563,0.00032016955,0.00012565589,0.000069549154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003759841,0.00019911156,0.00022462253,0.0003974501,0.00019407376,0.0003899278,0.000017500603,0.0013701363,0.0001482055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065734633,0.00029720832,0.0069180774,0.000014819766,0.0005572923,0.000033485012,0.021718979,0.00039725605,0.0015958471,0.95569026,0.0009813522,0.011138055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010748074,0.0072579063,0.037553333,0.00068464846,0.0008173013,0.00021446773,0.056483857,0.00013499765,0.003249556,0.19529441,0.6842027,0.0033587911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030530205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073476685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7603959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030502055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006482138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W49562361","doi":"","title":"Философия Г. В. Ф. Гегеля и теория правового государства Ч. Тейлора","year":2009,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Известия Российского государственного педагогического университета им. А. И. Герцена","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Philosophy; Enlightenment; Opposition (politics); Romanticism; Law; German; Criticism; Philosophy of law; Epistemology; Public law; Political science; Art history; History","score_opus":0.036487285038902556,"score_gpt":0.33317481799117926,"score_spread":0.2966875329522767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W49562361","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3976576,0.044410486,0.0007170453,0.10389105,0.024595484,0.013735611,0.0022252665,0.007308694,0.40545875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.858933,0.010235861,0.0035998472,0.013598535,0.012196772,0.00041464952,0.0006346948,0.0008045841,0.09958209],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96107036,0.0037823287,0.0073179984,0.007553718,0.008864905,0.011410679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790823,0.002647615,0.0044005127,0.0053560003,0.003182941,0.0053306227],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006388557,0.0066179777,0.007136787,0.0016993609,0.009846597,0.0038797257,0.008370664,0.0048202877,0.012040945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004716572,0.0064858017,0.0046751,0.007948554,0.0063458323,0.0053868885,0.0023110448,0.0067068813,0.021294823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002706989,0.0089576375,0.015509768,0.0013170737,0.0049654674,0.002404214,0.107128344,0.00073855685,0.012681455,0.09441477,0.5860193,0.16315646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010405385,0.0035855938,0.08972788,0.0022415083,0.0027647603,0.0002984359,0.033619225,0.0010246817,0.0029489105,0.013942411,0.8270087,0.012432489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013924463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048290933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46127534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005336399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025847806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W560033622","doi":"","title":"Walking With Henri Nouwen: A Reflective Journey","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Portrait; Beauty; Art; Iconography; Horseback riding; Art history; Psychoanalysis; Literature; Aesthetics; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04015691765336772,"score_gpt":0.32932391467478583,"score_spread":0.2891669970214181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W560033622","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000056451358,0.000975777,0.000040637497,0.0016199705,0.0003552733,0.000601729,0.0000055310284,0.00017945704,0.99616516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011277678,0.0006049981,0.0018337088,0.0006689289,0.00076180213,0.00003525205,0.0000068903687,0.000040128612,0.99492055],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975213,0.00022374024,0.00025295175,0.000473531,0.00092500786,0.00060346426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987157,0.00022057463,0.00026663687,0.00017474129,0.00042403332,0.0001983067],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048207314,0.00037365934,0.00053132325,0.0000595473,0.0016060696,0.00019716,0.00032351457,0.00042605476,0.0014363293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023999254,0.00024685924,0.00016602046,0.00018285358,0.0006266756,0.00021635288,0.00006824554,0.0006455559,0.00027053198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003707731,0.000052748797,0.0001620792,0.000049974893,0.0006858817,0.00006540392,0.10092016,0.0000027495869,0.0000053583985,0.14340566,0.75105476,0.003558118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022887111,0.00007534511,0.00008722054,0.00015795878,0.00008957333,0.0000027177052,0.009798807,2.8938007e-7,0.000005929962,0.004775076,0.9842743,0.00050389144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001997193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014973382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23321953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018526362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089387863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W561963998","doi":"","title":"Kent: Diocese of Canterbury ed. by James M. Gibson (review)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Classics","score_opus":0.009587483938067135,"score_gpt":0.24427150279728743,"score_spread":0.2346840188592203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W561963998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39199507,0.32980534,0.00018951953,0.0038353363,0.0007190871,0.0012483881,0.00018130773,0.00014600936,0.27187994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9482999,0.04269369,0.00046022728,0.0000894398,0.000031247546,4.431024e-7,0.0000057079073,0.000006245863,0.008413113],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895144,0.00021280673,0.000140085,0.00016307116,0.00031465088,0.0002179607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937755,0.00006038333,0.0001740185,0.0001266742,0.00016477238,0.0000965787],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024046701,0.00010312228,0.00029050699,0.000007744055,0.0002782064,0.000005271098,0.000276185,0.000066682645,0.0014344252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054399377,0.00010298583,0.00013909038,0.0000462353,0.00036847728,0.0003331008,0.000014570035,0.000050559032,0.000013961321],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004821806,0.00035363663,0.0046088654,0.0004836717,0.0002767814,0.000012397845,0.20998968,6.804179e-7,0.00076221616,0.0058409185,0.7462974,0.031325515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042953566,0.00024313002,0.0021151418,0.0002481861,0.0000863858,3.1618563e-7,0.1198622,0.0000015400918,0.00007258656,0.000025584455,0.8767177,0.00019768506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28962994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045177188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5563048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029608267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051870127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W562484688","doi":"","title":"1980-1982 Advocacy to Amend the Canadian Charter of Rights to Protect Disability Equality","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04070614098366927,"score_gpt":0.3374445379415789,"score_spread":0.29673839695790966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W562484688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82726926,0.000005935647,0.00007246514,0.071856126,0.00019332502,0.0017029212,0.00001585773,0.00005182322,0.09883232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962397,4.856653e-7,0.0003110644,0.0013112397,0.00022191853,0.00011443785,0.000001022178,0.0000040908108,0.0017960309],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981199,0.00044985698,0.00023501177,0.00026904565,0.00045383855,0.00047234207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988576,0.00020932392,0.00004945232,0.00028853636,0.00016142984,0.00043362597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015321478,0.00012370982,0.00021514714,0.000016508504,0.0012911955,0.00007472666,0.00040828905,0.00006944986,0.00040075622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007717572,0.00006719575,0.00008221365,0.00028883285,0.0004993588,0.0000938301,0.000080188416,0.00010707361,0.00019666023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058094556,0.00021917826,0.057669062,0.0000557856,0.00013260182,7.5897407e-7,0.57599306,0.000031033283,0.0005141449,0.32196727,0.021742528,0.02161649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016244914,0.00011132064,0.28255638,0.000018451961,0.000015512676,7.6966195e-8,0.008656407,0.000012328066,0.0007354602,0.004231513,0.703191,0.00030910576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9792705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99461985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68144846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051621726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010363151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W565890685","doi":"10.5860/choice.41-0568","title":"The Myth of the sacred: the charter, the courts, and the politics of the constitution in Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Politics; Mythology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.03333691860169268,"score_gpt":0.3108211969005495,"score_spread":0.2774842782988568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W565890685","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2956547,0.38724563,0.0000048191223,0.30082518,0.0017842217,0.005846568,0.00017554722,0.00001291303,0.008450424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90145886,0.093697526,0.000014867593,0.0037250575,0.00023618135,0.000056022658,0.0000012342584,0.0000055787436,0.00080466585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99686104,0.0017701804,0.0004871421,0.00012811541,0.00046124426,0.0002922936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972316,0.0016868842,0.00043956208,0.00046560378,0.00014236597,0.00003395689],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024086714,0.00014165831,0.00032356038,0.000004285258,0.0019640808,0.000036705205,0.0007984077,0.000041016712,0.000009043545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041402085,0.00003651819,0.00014027832,0.00029721486,0.0030188095,0.000049656912,0.000115018316,0.00031850228,8.690793e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026484413,0.0002109475,0.04352665,0.00039186046,0.0003242833,9.320339e-7,0.060602024,0.000059132508,0.000113209266,0.79104185,0.06660614,0.037096508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002588984,0.0000037228945,0.015522498,0.00016769377,0.00007109017,0.0000012022122,0.009588107,0.000021879094,0.000020313868,0.00056746625,0.973717,0.00006014498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5896626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88785785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90711087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024013234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065569876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W570479127","doi":"10.3138/9781442686007","title":"Parliamentary Democracy in Crisis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Democracy; Law; Duty; Constitutional crisis; Governor; Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02553492946148992,"score_gpt":0.2588360971326202,"score_spread":0.23330116767113027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W570479127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011624859,0.0026592813,0.0000037973189,0.00034868962,0.00010602694,0.00043495474,0.00002730809,0.000057524143,0.99624616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014031734,0.0029029846,0.0004558813,0.00008372174,0.00014461145,3.4161775e-7,0.000011920868,0.000010377051,0.994987],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985832,0.00015984703,0.0001749308,0.00031221804,0.0004521495,0.00031764974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992603,0.00009068396,0.00022884306,0.00018982346,0.0001158272,0.00011453222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018329744,0.00021093339,0.00044657904,0.000018156215,0.00044845228,0.000020252524,0.0005918586,0.0003385948,0.00036109542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019856778,0.00024305854,0.00019285876,0.0000023613204,0.00038752233,0.00027458926,0.00018572557,0.00020584099,0.000008269365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011931864,0.00009196612,0.00009393866,0.00010181702,0.0002846773,0.00010592687,0.2386463,0.0000068702366,0.000006157294,0.032331187,0.70188355,0.026328271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034811415,0.000028822787,0.00044246047,0.00011745865,0.00009230228,1.0260902e-7,0.007369953,0.0000012651975,0.0000044026024,0.0008944008,0.9904395,0.0002612261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8341303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6577279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28855592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021606013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019410158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99116397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W570861621","doi":"10.14288/1.0417313","title":"Catholic schools in Western Canada : their legal status","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic growth; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.0245903456253999,"score_gpt":0.28773296389444175,"score_spread":0.26314261826904184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W570861621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95344293,0.00023511132,5.699618e-7,0.009195551,0.0003268315,0.00023306315,0.000027840208,0.000047572787,0.03649052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98568165,0.000039343333,0.000028160372,0.000882802,0.000081006365,0.0000722688,0.00000391656,0.000005564361,0.013205293],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843854,0.0002662783,0.0001461727,0.00017661783,0.00047853924,0.0004938603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996444,0.00007713176,0.000038840324,0.00008648327,0.00003547117,0.000117678814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032290164,0.00009116964,0.00014127266,0.00002267462,0.0010851559,0.00006344499,0.00023890167,0.000020668747,0.0006230266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011142141,0.00007276997,0.000031079806,0.00030282795,0.0000671501,0.00015364765,0.00019105304,0.0002765733,0.0000100205825],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014089238,0.00009970942,0.77310807,0.00000839567,0.000043774573,0.0000860974,0.17847432,0.0003261241,0.00012521178,0.008888512,0.029817171,0.009008518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013504617,0.000009306522,0.10858046,0.0000014789978,0.0000016002743,4.0225515e-7,0.08846008,0.0000046433456,0.000009454018,0.000025815842,0.8026592,0.00011247437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99732333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99878925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77284205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017217713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008402559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8346251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W571975644","doi":"","title":"Canadian cases in the philosophy of law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Charter; Autonomy; Tort","score_opus":0.0708248539646352,"score_gpt":0.3284996902155102,"score_spread":0.25767483625087495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W571975644","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011462256,0.0006474053,7.744836e-8,0.006132173,0.00014051885,0.0003586102,0.000029746543,0.00001356017,0.9925633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19605523,0.00019833645,0.00003760607,0.0023772663,0.00068607467,0.000010340061,0.000014666466,0.000010168702,0.8006103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878126,0.00009270897,0.00020662522,0.00014586085,0.00044924373,0.00032430494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916774,0.0004354766,0.00008024674,0.00012133005,0.00009830124,0.00009691311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058368227,0.00013479563,0.00023669701,0.000060240967,0.00043353115,0.000028130651,0.00040233086,0.0002575319,0.00044021607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012781494,0.00008191923,0.00009911451,0.00010112861,0.0007474099,0.000056365407,0.000024846568,0.00024747764,0.000054465836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011420992,0.000006534801,0.00009125848,0.000012562746,0.000016736005,0.00004779078,0.017766364,1.978402e-7,7.16615e-8,0.94281876,0.03898723,0.0002513602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045711855,0.000013026731,0.00021268787,0.000043105367,0.000013477968,6.470114e-7,0.0034514184,4.8784255e-8,7.431748e-7,0.018297873,0.9777945,0.0001267052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97783923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9388073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090413133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052569987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48200572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W572475526","doi":"","title":"Women, Social Assistance and the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02255582569104898,"score_gpt":0.26201894253028374,"score_spread":0.23946311683923477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W572475526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9605855,0.0015704015,3.476261e-7,0.026860515,0.00033527598,0.0002895975,0.000049746322,0.00001696679,0.010291704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962154,0.00030995227,0.000017997832,0.0012425695,0.00019304662,0.0001271906,4.92072e-7,0.00000778916,0.0018855372],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822015,0.000117081625,0.00021267304,0.00019502103,0.0004132118,0.00084185513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990258,0.00020509728,0.000104259954,0.00008803678,0.00027269055,0.00030412205],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006695542,0.00015427846,0.000405482,0.000029997705,0.0028802443,0.000039195966,0.000220675,0.000051581977,0.000043881126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007395562,0.0001075443,0.000037498805,0.00025985696,0.002216379,0.00008739105,0.00005664866,0.00012521142,0.0000017744197],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038929666,0.000010805109,0.002141672,0.000053841926,0.0005611909,0.000017651926,0.8451579,0.000010104731,0.000006809348,0.14374948,0.007942963,0.00030866088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010474502,0.000019521967,0.011267613,0.000019786832,0.000018601118,3.8369652e-7,0.8954709,2.9860342e-7,0.000006100435,0.011142851,0.080786355,0.00022014264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87680256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13260663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057897517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018545974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99841785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W573285099","doi":"","title":"女性たちの NPO 活動 : カナダの女性たちの教育活動 NPO の実践","year":2002,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Kanagawa University Repository (Kanagawa University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.021032121669489055,"score_gpt":0.20065288989604593,"score_spread":0.17962076822655687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W573285099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18307748,0.0015217654,0.00005693782,0.007627183,0.0034675717,0.0014131971,0.00014238949,0.0010434508,0.80165005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61595976,0.0030585863,0.00034129806,0.00017111923,0.00076282525,4.550023e-7,0.000019145371,0.0000632359,0.3796236],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990627,0.0019284316,0.0007370969,0.0023584182,0.0019472349,0.0024018476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940397,0.0005679721,0.0010107219,0.0018490822,0.0009789515,0.0015535613],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053757965,0.00135151,0.0015119488,0.0010771331,0.00954006,0.0004902362,0.0045428034,0.0013157378,0.0021111916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025706546,0.0016690077,0.0013865981,0.004590356,0.0033651283,0.0029491808,0.0024165225,0.001575389,0.0017021758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013803317,0.0047273473,0.03931482,0.0009601038,0.009287814,0.03412734,0.25841287,0.0010185185,0.0032997853,0.08392551,0.5555119,0.008033675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025543277,0.00028246432,0.0064165327,0.00023785209,0.0013761255,0.000030272571,0.11459749,0.0005391719,0.00013548866,0.000038439914,0.87177074,0.0020210966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020911166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004619438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43288228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054369355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003121616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W588271392","doi":"","title":"Husband and wife and matrimonial law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Entomology and Zoology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Law; Commonwealth; Subject (documents); Table of contents; Section (typography); English law; Common law; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.01712667770689813,"score_gpt":0.31473086270743367,"score_spread":0.29760418500053554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W588271392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9526676,0.003885865,0.000029945704,0.012007464,0.00039207752,0.000117899355,0.0000010819548,0.000034522473,0.030863563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99525017,0.0018282206,0.00015439263,0.0016949446,0.00009986387,0.000009817763,9.1952404e-7,0.0000034315362,0.00095821876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986815,0.00044210508,0.00014026451,0.00023751271,0.00016721195,0.0003314199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921876,0.00041083855,0.000034829653,0.00004388858,0.000026744185,0.00026495132],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006883212,0.00009641001,0.0002390944,0.000019285071,0.00061176193,0.000017444083,0.00006311864,0.00037075463,0.00043390645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094261626,0.00007302001,0.00001680436,0.00005332912,0.0038034245,0.000055948527,0.000071226415,0.00021024741,0.000009220722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002276979,0.000032973774,0.084719874,0.000013939054,0.000043883945,0.00008094162,0.009213942,2.1744288e-8,0.000018787698,0.90055037,0.00034216832,0.004960337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006744955,0.0008734708,0.25344723,0.000050381597,0.00023581342,0.0009306201,0.01494227,0.000035827987,0.00014292916,0.23007028,0.49150458,0.0010216495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064984397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008206083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6704801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015541138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039670333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W589555638","doi":"","title":"修復的司法の動向(5)カナダ法律委員会「尊厳の回復」--原文名: Law Commission of Canada, Restoring Dignity: Responding to Child Abuse in Canadian Institutions(2000)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"法律時報","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Commission; Law; Political science; Child abuse; Criminology; Sociology; Poison control; Medicine; Suicide prevention; Environmental health","score_opus":0.042858529255995065,"score_gpt":0.3145350752367975,"score_spread":0.2716765459808025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W589555638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55730087,0.00026347328,0.0000023785274,0.0053864247,0.0005698674,0.0004334605,0.000028098244,0.000031038497,0.4359844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948822,0.00002929307,0.00024476263,0.00037139482,0.00010110462,0.000020564203,0.0000025347372,0.00000932916,0.004338808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803466,0.0002641729,0.0002801127,0.00023754714,0.0004770365,0.00070644997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989407,0.00010931597,0.00006812929,0.0001871358,0.00011579129,0.00057889667],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000809,0.00014250756,0.00023664109,0.00021162722,0.0017325965,0.000046208155,0.00025844277,0.00010509071,0.00009305002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013870348,0.00013582208,0.00004041073,0.0011529012,0.00018782286,0.00020230102,0.000030733405,0.00022756952,0.000011792055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004706765,0.00010330079,0.09177193,0.00005136406,0.000058115118,0.0001253271,0.16729125,0.001017729,0.0004684472,0.72338504,0.014693585,0.0009868628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018467281,0.000013057169,0.02658267,0.0001332396,0.000006227291,7.83448e-7,0.00699676,0.000002226756,0.00035726896,0.0000830906,0.9654463,0.00019371546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9982667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99987376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9507527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035688425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020973755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W591305737","doi":"","title":"Thoughts on ... 'exorcising' gay marriage; Medjugorje; Toronto's troubles","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exorcism; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Theology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.039364246968826545,"score_gpt":0.32822268044661584,"score_spread":0.2888584334777893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W591305737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.109899335,0.00051607535,0.00005881158,0.011247234,0.0010897114,0.00083912135,0.0000029184416,0.0004003091,0.87594646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9281351,0.00030484793,0.0014030855,0.0007269186,0.0016287236,0.00008388286,0.0000023363425,0.000014868236,0.06770025],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981186,0.0001980182,0.0002313803,0.0003290031,0.0005481214,0.0005749239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990404,0.00028882932,0.0000777848,0.00019500662,0.00017982742,0.0002181272],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033531996,0.00020135035,0.0002514083,0.000015277177,0.001196643,0.00027118306,0.00035393133,0.0001418918,0.0073270258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032407834,0.00013355538,0.00012832701,0.00011828645,0.00029678553,0.00072439876,0.00007713025,0.00011515686,0.0014153586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048226513,0.00039387247,0.0061835586,0.000029366252,0.00026008714,0.000008855095,0.111496255,0.000013811108,0.0012119157,0.22071278,0.5517832,0.10785804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096386956,0.00018312655,0.088795386,0.000060882245,0.000045291654,7.2175675e-7,0.08664889,0.000039221213,0.0015376797,0.007828895,0.812935,0.00096102414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12627867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05685804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81823575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004992116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003413827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W59436585","doi":"","title":"Universality vs. Particularity: Litigating Middle Class Values under Section 15","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Class (philosophy); Political science; Universality (dynamical systems); Section (typography); Ask price; Preference; Middle class; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Mathematics; Business; Statistics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0414437799937484,"score_gpt":0.2897674056415472,"score_spread":0.24832362564779878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W59436585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831388,0.0013926547,0.000858508,0.008462655,0.0004876839,0.00016476407,0.0000011852777,0.000119467724,0.0053742877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899508,0.003551001,0.00011836841,0.00019278338,0.001092247,0.0000037267098,0.000001673188,0.000012414411,0.0050770245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963014,0.00053926767,0.00026261393,0.00022384802,0.0006251384,0.0020477476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919325,0.000114613984,0.000185819,0.00009565621,0.00024944314,0.00016123838],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020163439,0.00015617923,0.00021715167,0.000038821017,0.003628835,0.000089855435,0.00022652348,0.00014579642,0.000072955365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032634023,0.0001352852,0.00017782667,0.00030658324,0.0004722736,0.0005140255,0.00004934523,0.0015135997,0.00003224191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014400712,0.0003921786,0.08131663,0.000028245935,0.0012785854,0.00004077767,0.11763607,0.000659511,0.0009506034,0.7894256,0.002494678,0.00563308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023375428,0.0004977139,0.06902723,0.00011346511,0.00026894236,0.00037439135,0.45889047,0.00025374463,0.00039956256,0.40193206,0.06467971,0.0012251657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0082393745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025687987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38749358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033253708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013729513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99836487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W597048075","doi":"10.1017/9780585490809.008","title":"Where did all the Charters Go? Anglo-Saxon Charters and the New Politics of the Eleventh Century","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eleventh; Demise; Quarter (Canadian coin); Politics; History; Anglo saxon; Ancient history; Political science; Archaeology; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.01959419157782072,"score_gpt":0.26467809340827453,"score_spread":0.2450839018304538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W597048075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038464472,0.015681325,0.000005051514,0.1023226,0.001177228,0.001781635,0.00005978167,0.00011579293,0.8784719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016244428,0.017641518,0.000040029838,0.0018376587,0.0011323036,0.000024404088,0.0000026603848,0.000084317755,0.96299267],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979725,0.00040427476,0.00023566045,0.00026541157,0.00063400506,0.00048815756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897057,0.00022010776,0.00030381803,0.0003526386,0.000042425236,0.000110459645],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031661268,0.00028797128,0.00037767022,0.000020169342,0.00070645666,0.000096551405,0.00075171713,0.00022568635,0.0019918699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010219728,0.00010985118,0.00024467765,0.00015509184,0.001897323,0.000053410415,0.0001785678,0.00029125973,0.000049191287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000403764,0.000018656883,0.00026739272,0.000030314535,0.00021133159,4.143256e-7,0.03823479,1.6701676e-7,0.0000025146996,0.024478287,0.9352199,0.0015321857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000440742,0.000010623441,0.00072395045,0.00010523847,0.00011184068,4.7512145e-7,0.017059699,0.0000047246876,0.0000028094867,0.00016077324,0.98120517,0.00017393212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033499815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016482107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100484945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108806635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046539255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W602390078","doi":"","title":"Constitution of Canada : constitution, act of parliament, uncodified constitution, constitutional convention (political custom), form of government, civil and political rights, French language, constitution act, 1982","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Alphascript Pub. eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Parliament; Politics; Political science; Law; Convention; Limited government; Government (linguistics); Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.017337019442992804,"score_gpt":0.26794762762794866,"score_spread":0.25061060818495584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W602390078","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027006841,0.0011935006,0.0009304729,0.0006331768,0.0014136424,0.0019205187,0.0030200935,0.000101083526,0.9880868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662488,0.00009604244,0.00021341605,0.0003019554,0.00041648062,0.000062257735,0.0004245429,0.000011854532,0.032224644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925911,0.00039220628,0.0021517414,0.00089101715,0.0025526513,0.0014213268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99517614,0.0006140841,0.0016402778,0.00050122134,0.0012768996,0.0007913848],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010931093,0.00084984564,0.0017489156,0.0002004899,0.001355733,0.00009043812,0.00051882985,0.00091970206,0.00028427618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001245087,0.0007911761,0.00043863262,0.00017931795,0.029938886,0.0004697289,0.00018730399,0.0007335582,0.0000064352457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008830694,0.0001890227,0.00075861404,0.0003619366,0.0005500271,0.000046275087,0.0010600514,0.000006197773,0.0003435853,0.9714389,0.024858143,0.0002989525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004636454,0.0003307112,0.0009280047,0.002113225,0.0015497266,0.00013454417,0.005008982,0.000028551613,0.005636972,0.043405365,0.9345995,0.0016279285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3525164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35953885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9635481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045189336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014192984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W603888656","doi":"10.3138/9781442627901","title":"Indigenous Difference and the Constitution of Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":255,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Indigenous; Political science; Geography; Law; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.018221838054836258,"score_gpt":0.21499579505707678,"score_spread":0.1967739570022405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W603888656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00067896146,0.0035296187,0.0000075116955,0.000053224772,0.00010971408,0.00041939924,0.000054950346,0.000010892259,0.9951357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016327191,0.0027979515,0.000028754303,0.000011305133,0.000046654146,2.973458e-7,0.0000029703465,0.0000025478182,0.98078233],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999161,0.00011159633,0.00010054689,0.0001314596,0.00033847906,0.00015689102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925756,0.0001696191,0.00024459584,0.00010820106,0.00016173805,0.00005828065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013387878,0.00010970196,0.0003053672,0.0000038823964,0.00069601985,0.000008609292,0.0003124348,0.00013493533,0.000039405048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003688015,0.00008795714,0.000058542184,0.000001253372,0.002339146,0.000040416857,0.00013754556,0.00009658334,9.383196e-8],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002866983,0.000023191127,0.0001698186,0.00021917351,0.0006131445,0.000028512704,0.48456416,0.000004941066,0.000010265111,0.47440636,0.027045842,0.012627909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046313563,0.000012110378,0.00051949313,0.000078164456,0.00011505044,3.26908e-7,0.0031883456,0.0000014028687,0.0000051337615,0.00020653826,0.9952941,0.000116197196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99731684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96824825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083303486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010261632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86186814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W605094940","doi":"10.21991/c9th5g","title":"COMMITTEE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF CANADA V. CANADA: EXPRESSION ON PUBLIC PROPERTY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Property (philosophy); Expression (computer science); Political science; Public administration; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.07212678137162992,"score_gpt":0.2714665961266507,"score_spread":0.19933981475502077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W605094940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020515302,0.0038173725,0.022827629,0.33955866,0.014756428,0.009843302,0.0037291383,0.00038240274,0.58456975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959922,0.000059345028,0.0004714007,0.0020642565,0.00014318357,0.00024386524,0.00003554893,0.000007693596,0.0009825403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970874,0.00015325272,0.000542128,0.00034759165,0.00095782516,0.0009117884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752265,0.000774722,0.0003072477,0.0003205234,0.00078121084,0.0002936157],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059494947,0.00027681122,0.00036137854,0.000046884164,0.0062460797,0.000043928347,0.0007007564,0.00012931977,0.00020642586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015539345,0.00016121946,0.00014437424,0.00027120992,0.0058213184,0.00031171658,0.0001523179,0.0002674156,0.000004495077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006334398,0.00007395466,0.010372187,0.000017534896,0.0000762705,0.0000033644253,0.0004900393,0.000065320324,0.000018634602,0.8394721,0.14882278,0.0005244612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008611735,0.00005832905,0.003896807,0.00012260838,0.000041045576,0.000006647521,0.017765367,0.00010144985,0.00050930685,0.0021156494,0.97415125,0.000370358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9778981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99760467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97547686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014408722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017532196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W607144950","doi":"10.71781/2511","title":"Triangulation of rights, balancing of interests : exploring the tensions between freedom of conscience and freedom of religion in comparative constitutional law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Law; Political science; Triangulation; Freedom of religion; Human rights; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.12602035902652556,"score_gpt":0.38844987042280754,"score_spread":0.262429511396282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W607144950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876041,0.00017359002,0.000006830352,0.00007691814,0.00027292393,0.0006801696,0.000090297464,7.339674e-7,0.011094478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985836,0.000038176622,0.0011626126,9.393995e-7,0.000041105042,0.000013565254,0.000054600092,0.0000021667543,0.00010323831],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850774,0.0001713927,0.0006057085,0.00020325757,0.0003887154,0.00012317038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978303,0.00077999325,0.00077109114,0.000116823874,0.00046614447,0.00003565519],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007829242,0.000120807876,0.00056121417,0.000068279165,0.0002954982,0.00002571457,0.00036337727,0.00013583722,0.000041308034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003963647,0.00008260746,0.000060773396,0.00025830802,0.002920782,0.00031413548,0.0000903791,0.00020841876,9.229811e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004470451,0.00027060512,0.07811276,0.00019871334,0.0003280587,0.0000025753775,0.6506231,0.00031982674,0.057191085,0.20842937,0.0002311056,0.0038457694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028495556,0.00026693183,0.6906621,0.0046441318,0.0004239235,9.860091e-7,0.2011311,0.00016015102,0.09068667,0.0040445183,0.0044568963,0.00067302695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1957185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61254936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044353343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018804162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W608691202","doi":"","title":"Law and order","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Pearson eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04066260144951496,"score_gpt":0.3039386100844718,"score_spread":0.26327600863495687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W608691202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001089354,0.002300394,0.0000013404189,0.00052268576,0.00042273928,0.00034853624,0.000013162455,0.00012425728,0.99615794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0057568057,0.00020372366,0.00020530997,0.00058375247,0.0014600581,0.00002290389,0.0000069284783,0.000030078369,0.99173045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859715,0.000096929274,0.0001578943,0.0002575419,0.00043717705,0.00045330814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932224,0.00011612233,0.000116089126,0.00012755046,0.00012798067,0.00018999455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033670804,0.0002298319,0.00031663213,0.000022169783,0.0009543149,0.000108468244,0.0001763318,0.00035923702,0.00028380178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006636559,0.00019359289,0.00008030777,0.000016651544,0.0010220715,0.00007468542,0.00013539122,0.00033136408,0.00025502782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005866117,0.0000109430985,0.000045572186,0.000066630484,0.00011456513,0.0000063310176,0.0764387,2.958276e-8,0.000007791458,0.857082,0.055576283,0.010645287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009951363,0.000010494732,0.00007918184,0.000049579896,0.000058206882,6.3746194e-7,0.001183985,1.7563355e-7,0.0000024683923,0.0026591604,0.995589,0.00026760448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053988365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073940945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9400127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024641657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012664778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81614614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W60936869","doi":"10.29173/alr147","title":"Calculations of Conscience: The Costs and Benefits of Religious and Conscientious Freedom","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Charter; Religious freedom; Supreme court; Law; Freedom of religion; Relation (database); Freedom of thought; Conscientious objector; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Human rights; Economic freedom; Computer science","score_opus":0.04491119498714585,"score_gpt":0.3072230540440316,"score_spread":0.26231185905688575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W60936869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42535174,0.41639793,0.000002714806,0.009554115,0.00026377966,0.0017749158,0.000025070814,0.000020631052,0.1466091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8845474,0.114744425,0.00015279766,0.0003277333,0.000011847877,0.000014276465,7.257441e-7,0.0000027473952,0.00019804266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907416,0.00013170266,0.0002628431,0.00015372231,0.00022579163,0.00015175155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989403,0.0004843298,0.00017929323,0.00014015455,0.0001888959,0.00006706147],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005574478,0.00007880298,0.00026004756,0.000009053076,0.00048889,0.000014441965,0.00016838004,0.000037148027,0.000045893255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057127216,0.000046991183,0.00005151812,0.00023993183,0.0028432575,0.000101423946,0.000084444044,0.00005079872,0.0000039448573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019751824,0.000032610038,0.012440863,0.00028162613,0.000038421746,2.544601e-7,0.018567571,3.7740676e-7,0.000023406927,0.963336,0.0017922267,0.0034846761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012226466,0.0002554763,0.12971364,0.0073382375,0.0011272776,0.000025304069,0.0069268956,0.000027581156,0.00033734037,0.0046298667,0.84749806,0.00089767406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1386557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07414635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95870614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016566775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030194062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W611177413","doi":"","title":"The Constitution of Independence: The Development of Constitutional Theory in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Research Portal (King's College London)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Constitution; Parliamentary sovereignty; Sovereignty; Independence (probability theory); Law; Constitutional theory; Popular sovereignty; Political science; Empire; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07005449251661283,"score_gpt":0.36520379223143073,"score_spread":0.2951492997148179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W611177413","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09553535,0.008041137,0.00001166974,0.00535712,0.0009192911,0.00504452,0.00051435834,0.000033367833,0.8845432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52632827,0.0006697339,0.00008158999,0.000017546556,0.00024033239,0.00004440149,0.000018980993,0.0000065331637,0.47259262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948323,0.0005944413,0.0007586811,0.00033660373,0.0028023976,0.00067557296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964117,0.0021766333,0.00035631936,0.00020464609,0.00065519544,0.00019552055],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005641213,0.00023263003,0.000440051,0.00011772544,0.0017281984,0.00006306187,0.0006462612,0.0003262633,0.00022808473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013479406,0.00014455286,0.000074591735,0.00037081042,0.008690134,0.00013843026,0.0002765433,0.0010640225,0.000005124584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119776705,0.000037858485,0.0119333165,0.000075296244,0.00023401533,0.00005635665,0.009591425,0.000016370219,0.000012891077,0.91435254,0.061106842,0.0024633412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072525005,0.000036580346,0.02199867,0.000646941,0.000029778912,0.000009327255,0.009992063,0.000002006885,0.00008373897,0.01211394,0.95403737,0.00032431894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5275533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.983079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90223855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009106508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027157066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W613864256","doi":"","title":"Calling power to account : law, reparations, and the Chinese Canadian head tax case","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Redress; Law; Statutory law; Political science; Appeal; Sociology","score_opus":0.020918718115401205,"score_gpt":0.32684184672137123,"score_spread":0.30592312860597004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W613864256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037513708,0.0021361364,0.0000029762116,0.040084936,0.00030701674,0.001062749,0.00007496626,0.000060500362,0.95251936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14866708,0.000377232,0.00028207482,0.0059732283,0.0009549033,0.000066393695,0.000011426969,0.000018073553,0.84364957],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984887,0.00011794492,0.00026325902,0.0003319237,0.00036705917,0.00043106556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882394,0.0003021735,0.00008173363,0.00020118465,0.00020290761,0.0003880832],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006769708,0.00025285786,0.00034467175,0.000043754608,0.0029393265,0.0002993521,0.00022279705,0.00025716075,0.00074932486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003612155,0.00014347669,0.00010457098,0.00011769951,0.0006354138,0.00015731233,0.00008115192,0.0002903228,0.00015946964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022637596,0.000011901923,0.00015478759,0.000012792087,0.00018089892,0.000306404,0.17030716,0.000028051812,4.028017e-7,0.35825443,0.46955702,0.001163496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017240907,0.000007798536,0.00017930263,0.000025544688,0.000024646062,0.00001993913,0.003495697,0.0000072695307,4.945681e-8,0.0007595333,0.9950587,0.000249084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95872504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99914443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52550167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012169601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058775087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W614274994","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139013789","title":"Marriage and Divorce in a Multicultural Context: Multi-Tiered Marriage And The Boundaries Of Civil Law And Religion","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Law; Legal pluralism; Multiculturalism; Marriage law; Religious law; Sociology; Pluralism (philosophy); Citizenship; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Comparative law; Politics; Public law; Legal realism; Islam; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01801676471121098,"score_gpt":0.2657856318087223,"score_spread":0.2477688670975113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W614274994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11177511,0.05545894,0.000013186214,0.01219123,0.001079988,0.008672451,0.00019264786,0.00024509442,0.81037134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6832455,0.0056976755,0.00027579244,0.00058898027,0.00016092259,0.00010585676,0.000015396017,0.000025879057,0.30988404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975332,0.0004189946,0.00057001726,0.0005252536,0.00047085705,0.00048166295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812454,0.00093514513,0.00035592206,0.00018982921,0.00022552234,0.00016903708],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008668292,0.00044696854,0.0009611639,0.00004673118,0.0014956164,0.0006359968,0.000245902,0.00048031393,0.00009735724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069505867,0.0002528774,0.00011063886,0.00008060234,0.010616141,0.00037337758,0.00044734625,0.0004465739,0.000006400365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003076687,0.00006782297,0.001723421,0.00053104956,0.0004135997,0.000016707992,0.38564357,4.645185e-7,0.00007771718,0.5730832,0.03563638,0.0024983704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013054226,0.0001621804,0.012185131,0.0011025121,0.0004119788,0.000010674094,0.094373696,0.0002274128,0.000030215491,0.01629479,0.8604369,0.0017102504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13105145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4437424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82480055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020535676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011412628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W636851208","doi":"10.3138/9781442671522","title":"Bora Laskin: Bringing Law to Life","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Federalism; Supreme Court Decisions; Politics","score_opus":0.029427279374476114,"score_gpt":0.26196193133620016,"score_spread":0.23253465196172404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W636851208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023563264,0.000017027882,0.00003142374,0.0024435155,0.0005158889,0.0013184255,0.00007900112,0.0005739205,0.9947852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025393859,0.22684778,0.0033899755,0.004743551,0.008464849,0.00002406365,0.00014719517,0.00030630606,0.73068243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967837,0.00024086228,0.00028642683,0.0008436528,0.00088028784,0.00096511503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982875,0.00022620756,0.00026130816,0.0003962827,0.00036983308,0.0004588784],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034858056,0.000555993,0.0006916103,0.004086025,0.0017401355,0.0002262148,0.0011106855,0.00058663957,0.0002510288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026922367,0.0006053711,0.00038102528,0.0037515871,0.0005132581,0.00058772374,0.00067026657,0.0006971002,0.0005341013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024350926,0.00035342385,0.00014812111,0.00035074892,0.001479858,0.00082001725,0.32427427,0.000105283725,0.0000024263024,0.40881824,0.2238223,0.039581798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038274954,0.000051329676,0.000020891735,0.00020394768,0.00017164556,8.1438213e-7,0.0033862167,0.000003964062,0.0000050370513,0.0000029790453,0.99499583,0.0007745958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33324227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37574124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77117354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032856436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018367401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W639867689","doi":"","title":"The Scope and Interpretation of the Civil Code of Lower Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Medical Entomology and Zoology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Scope (computer science); Civil code; Code (set theory); Political science; Law; Epistemology; Computer science; Programming language; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00800350181056499,"score_gpt":0.2710659422591503,"score_spread":0.26306244044858534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W639867689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2158336,0.026655154,0.00003673152,0.07029206,0.011205748,0.0011591356,0.000070606846,0.000028764027,0.6747182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8835813,0.0035340248,0.00000868345,0.00073283317,0.00015129801,0.000012241385,0.0000041230974,0.0000062429117,0.11196928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986905,0.0003430931,0.00026197603,0.00015581975,0.00035019752,0.00019843022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980969,0.0013813066,0.00022553862,0.00010581265,0.0001089774,0.000081492435],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068599096,0.000103398634,0.00032405063,0.00001194054,0.00037906817,0.0000043182495,0.0003160093,0.0005981189,0.00023276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020143688,0.000052299485,0.000041667194,0.00003440563,0.006291825,0.000012076498,0.00021265647,0.0005599478,6.7920297e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046253778,0.00010473614,0.017512783,0.00041263833,0.0011749247,0.00010613708,0.04360209,0.0000010358368,0.00007488127,0.6564179,0.121161126,0.15896922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011488589,0.00038584112,0.033091873,0.00040799973,0.00036334488,0.00006781225,0.0025749959,0.00007426229,0.000053918822,0.055774007,0.9055925,0.00046460517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31285265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9806863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78443134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005809058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010792435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99641246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W644601168","doi":"","title":"Towards an Ethics of Community: Negotiations of Difference in a Pluralist Society","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Honour; Postmodernism; Faith; Negotiation; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Deviance (statistics); Law; Social science; Media studies; Art; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07069602876341685,"score_gpt":0.30856467015598527,"score_spread":0.23786864139256841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W644601168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021882784,0.0000105049285,0.00001906985,0.00075636606,0.00010554282,0.0008233088,0.00031304426,0.000098328484,0.9759911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44227853,0.51319325,0.0017437756,0.0004068217,0.00034983552,0.0000122958445,0.00051940256,0.00010299695,0.041393097],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688894,0.0013327764,0.0003817602,0.00028017166,0.00072156545,0.00039479253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997863,0.00064632716,0.00046808025,0.0004281198,0.0004968348,0.00009762032],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007164606,0.0003308995,0.00072923856,0.0020305295,0.00093718886,0.000034950965,0.0011313021,0.00084783684,0.0000810014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003024602,0.00034321513,0.00037328244,0.0033563557,0.0015506807,0.00035839176,0.0003287352,0.0018417205,0.0000031490204],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006352791,0.00047541768,0.0003765414,0.00040383858,0.00026267703,0.000009897253,0.963244,0.000019298397,0.000004038372,0.027437165,0.0010507902,0.006652772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053910323,0.00012374579,0.001230259,0.0003062856,0.00016043981,2.650124e-7,0.04063798,0.00001371759,0.000013004368,0.000058516252,0.9565388,0.0003779056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73515064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5273003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95548797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013686913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003195011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W646178245","doi":"","title":"Public Law: An Overview of Aboriginal, Administrative, Constitutional and International Law in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Administrative law; Public law; Constitutional law; Comparative law","score_opus":0.09942884667948793,"score_gpt":0.3475195930818287,"score_spread":0.2480907464023408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W646178245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001793594,0.006590655,7.1276725e-7,0.002718488,0.00071272976,0.0004048823,0.00059005537,0.000030778032,0.9871581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7313048,0.006731353,0.00046340944,0.0024882704,0.0011571243,0.00008741487,0.00033000574,0.000030312334,0.25740728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975676,0.00019308487,0.000491856,0.00043967192,0.0009187399,0.0003890251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862224,0.00020122922,0.00029817203,0.00016828859,0.00037773378,0.00033235794],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003305907,0.0002973163,0.00051880645,0.00003690802,0.00057102967,0.00017912437,0.0004976832,0.00023564478,0.0018943903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010597217,0.00028199833,0.00008205564,0.0001085235,0.0029352857,0.00069293956,0.000080372745,0.0005057339,0.000023800092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063144957,0.000040375442,0.0012574116,0.000045267792,0.00007942647,0.000024825555,0.0004940725,0.0000015631473,0.0000012588758,0.9890846,0.008840264,0.00012460277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034790707,0.000026865517,0.0008199559,0.00019950973,0.00002229959,0.0000029316022,0.0005930315,0.0000030987103,0.0000028832837,0.009579128,0.9880829,0.0003194853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93831724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99791193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9795055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022627844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003976814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W64685650","doi":"10.21991/c9fq07","title":"CANADA'S QUEST FOR CONSTITUTIONAL PERFECTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Perfection; Philosophy; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.04150483677496133,"score_gpt":0.28082084795185586,"score_spread":0.23931601117689452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W64685650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007116097,0.0022481035,0.20568095,0.026621386,0.014698971,0.0046926118,0.0026203243,0.0009315681,0.73539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992188,0.00010730551,0.003331068,0.0017033535,0.0005809121,0.00044118933,0.00018747433,0.000011484694,0.0014492531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632883,0.00014332277,0.0006752065,0.00070734526,0.0009009241,0.001244369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974767,0.0003748798,0.00026793603,0.00026096628,0.0011456755,0.00047386473],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063031324,0.00044279807,0.00045583808,0.00014073445,0.0069364114,0.00011635509,0.00048159162,0.0003089867,0.0007746638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001646545,0.00042975091,0.00031420044,0.00040752592,0.018436614,0.0009012659,0.00013182138,0.00031926658,0.000112278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087692795,0.000119694865,0.014283376,0.000019372545,0.00013894512,0.000013949267,0.00049436936,0.00008276234,0.000049673843,0.95120054,0.032925613,0.00058402575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014253671,0.000066129374,0.0023841464,0.00010210013,0.000110963374,0.00006623902,0.007171303,0.000099156874,0.00028206475,0.015460985,0.97205496,0.00077655906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39711595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6494029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98507184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018852904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011264249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W651745859","doi":"","title":"The psychology of justice and legitimacy : the Ontario Symposium","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Psychology Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Legitimacy; Economic Justice; Politics; Blame; Social psychology; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05858516120892503,"score_gpt":0.3712442374378867,"score_spread":0.31265907622896166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W651745859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006932564,0.001975133,0.0000068950344,0.0071655605,0.003751717,0.001001631,0.00001901979,0.000058505047,0.98532826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017053484,0.002285882,0.00011996184,0.0017385572,0.0010291002,0.00017791026,0.0000048913744,0.000036221132,0.9929021],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741846,0.00047429668,0.00050683756,0.00058519363,0.00040664955,0.00060856465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997094,0.0011525484,0.0005467476,0.0007307551,0.00035856376,0.000117417454],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001067038,0.000362301,0.0005083396,0.00003231494,0.0021064216,0.000098878125,0.0012952306,0.0009216727,0.00005288261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002380575,0.00020677657,0.00017465655,0.000016756247,0.006738188,0.000048754733,0.00028755775,0.0017098256,0.000017354101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024926465,0.00007685856,0.00018665324,0.00010690602,0.00080409826,0.000017564224,0.11563538,4.4254014e-7,0.00027699792,0.3094071,0.55663806,0.016600715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003637698,0.000053963,0.0016224755,0.000028431296,0.0004131028,0.000008112255,0.00029707662,2.3526368e-7,0.0000068331524,0.006505721,0.9904671,0.00023320458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028380085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18569082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43382904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011268472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002219362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W652212226","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal justice and the Charter : realizing a culturally sensitive interpretation of legal rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"UBC Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Economic Justice; Miller; Political science; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021590533325061306,"score_gpt":0.3099246111933482,"score_spread":0.2883340778682869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W652212226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006626755,0.0010127667,0.00003800481,0.00029226023,0.00048217925,0.00086971855,0.000043615666,0.00006108789,0.9965377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15705928,0.0004216862,0.00014893118,0.00015975951,0.0015313107,0.000066953246,0.000020066573,0.000021788725,0.8405702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810094,0.0004083676,0.00033663175,0.00027530178,0.0005337921,0.000344943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984486,0.0004910511,0.0004300746,0.00015196925,0.00038003194,0.00009826248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005487119,0.0002809959,0.0004880734,0.00002760916,0.00081896683,0.0001347249,0.00023653859,0.00025193422,0.000008865878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000070437105,0.00016285421,0.00015271961,0.000012398369,0.0016645975,0.00022270728,0.00007367015,0.00038404344,0.0000060286998],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017898259,0.0000075585754,0.000001140166,0.00015769541,0.0002589458,0.0000058589526,0.29890084,6.411772e-7,0.000024534502,0.6920865,0.0066814036,0.0016958612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006321453,0.00002349539,0.000062041225,0.00039169154,0.0010912344,0.0000043266614,0.003274791,0.000047594753,0.00008423961,0.0014572717,0.9926054,0.0003257819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015489616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035265319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.985924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019036893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010020919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99106634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W652692206","doi":"10.5860/choice.51-3452","title":"Lord Mansfield: justice in the age of reason","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; History; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.09194085210354518,"score_gpt":0.4023132341256964,"score_spread":0.3103723820221512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W652692206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5050974,0.16920702,0.000492684,0.08196417,0.0021284733,0.0057133455,0.000045769746,0.0001888613,0.2351623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.770589,0.2070858,0.0051673334,0.007261514,0.004508274,0.00014974229,0.000071721886,0.000028208442,0.0051384023],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829614,0.0006962728,0.0003525527,0.00015629256,0.00027166336,0.00022706387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988185,0.0007241394,0.00014659898,0.00021241969,0.00006189877,0.000036406458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018023399,0.00010720163,0.00035349463,0.000018080646,0.00021062448,0.00002151711,0.0004321233,0.00007005337,0.000060974926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004770543,0.000060815277,0.00010692881,0.00033686918,0.00018829425,0.00009402503,0.000040366984,0.00019247159,0.00003776605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021150987,0.0010102215,0.025408633,0.0026252018,0.000056419594,0.00001274858,0.09848483,0.000011959291,0.00059099443,0.03671234,0.045077275,0.7899882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012224431,0.000019957124,0.023028823,0.0002238465,0.000054281823,1.7804791e-7,0.0027235474,0.0000075097864,0.00000318902,0.00010067571,0.97363377,0.00008200277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004783829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026086094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92855644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004254155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001453355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9916853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W67314392","doi":"","title":"Women and the Canadian Legal System: Examining Situations of Hyper-Responsability","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.058642821512053044,"score_gpt":0.2840631292151134,"score_spread":0.22542030770306035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W67314392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9736839,0.00094365375,2.2932774e-7,0.004709575,0.0002610433,0.00049925566,0.000050702274,0.000034755165,0.019816894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963799,0.00019215315,0.000037318034,0.00042322793,0.00013665826,0.0002829993,0.0000011174587,0.000009409381,0.0025371825],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977319,0.00044211795,0.00029648843,0.00026625805,0.00034550627,0.0009176826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978489,0.0007337148,0.0000993135,0.00019346827,0.00038758136,0.0007369741],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015761114,0.00017834327,0.00047247938,0.00013146321,0.0060282797,0.00005831067,0.0002501744,0.000086588974,0.000050805087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024321747,0.0001280972,0.00004564442,0.00042816883,0.0038862592,0.00017516607,0.000059153925,0.00016106453,0.0000145450485],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025494752,0.00000810094,0.019570174,0.00005922445,0.00033212255,0.000024470071,0.92833513,0.0000083809655,0.000005335468,0.050384626,0.0008503345,0.0003966179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005731112,0.000041013496,0.0426403,0.000027127413,0.00002398346,0.000005484584,0.92049986,0.000006543047,0.0000021576498,0.0006284142,0.03531889,0.00023309814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8660019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9902273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.124225356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00617216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017840316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6894125576","doi":"10.5287/ora-zozxe810n","title":"The notwithstanding clause in the Canadian charter of rights and freedoms: a new interpretive approach","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislation; Equal Protection Clause; Supreme court; Legislature; Establishment Clause; Judicial review; Dormant Commerce Clause; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.03308588672588148,"score_gpt":0.29350575532987033,"score_spread":0.26041986860398886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6894125576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44708437,0.00048486298,0.000103125094,0.0041213124,0.00023263182,0.002641582,0.0005797038,0.00003291365,0.5447195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709051,0.0027939295,0.0005492208,0.000013956427,0.00005928482,0.0000012633371,0.00019443195,0.000015596259,0.025467215],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573076,0.0015434966,0.00016998519,0.00046810726,0.0013052317,0.00078243954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974702,0.0012821142,0.00025418907,0.00032212888,0.00034561593,0.00032577713],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018093657,0.00023121377,0.0004196421,0.00068090385,0.0068887523,0.0000902074,0.0020830312,0.00020883337,0.0001835643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028271097,0.00019570478,0.00020155012,0.0011405303,0.0025714955,0.00038702152,0.00045005858,0.001454536,0.0000012461762],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011930048,0.000101498386,0.003974067,0.000111418325,0.00034968313,0.00011198348,0.88322747,0.000008725811,0.00002509712,0.098955184,0.009637336,0.0023045477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048671025,0.00015552036,0.016499301,0.00011363146,0.00005611358,7.555413e-7,0.6670492,0.00008126824,0.0000013665433,0.002960829,0.31239983,0.00019545441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78937817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9762636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52382076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013503535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001390385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99440414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6904662550","doi":"10.14288/1.0221993","title":"Rules of the Law Society of British Columbia","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Work (physics); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.021736731876646983,"score_gpt":0.2147679610793972,"score_spread":0.1930312292027502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6904662550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851544,0.00044775585,0.0000066537605,0.00039175828,0.00020999371,0.00032170565,0.0004386235,0.000042132557,0.0129870055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926847,0.0003426389,0.0005810851,0.000059127746,0.00005014984,5.86017e-7,0.000004759472,0.000008110925,0.006268831],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983869,0.00018100602,0.00018718999,0.0002588749,0.00069585943,0.00029016877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856126,0.00008028379,0.00029670267,0.00020218531,0.0007193838,0.00014020957],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005093328,0.000038243732,0.00036437952,0.0000037393734,0.00076811237,0.0001261614,0.0006550406,0.00016371858,0.00012494062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011457242,0.00012944243,0.0003406896,0.00029200307,0.0029934845,0.00035161615,0.00032003087,0.00014125677,0.0000058372198],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000130178705,0.00062134716,0.2641468,0.00034487183,0.0004642639,0.00003076663,0.041987445,0.000011414496,0.00032294335,0.00015372578,0.51116955,0.18073383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070568797,0.000036873793,0.9321625,0.00018554895,0.000056741035,0.0000039171587,0.053765077,0.000009001523,9.965772e-7,0.0008875771,0.0120364195,0.00014963491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9804326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.989636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6680157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017775649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001821036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6923635745","doi":"10.14288/1.0370798","title":"An Act to Amend the Procedure in Civil Cases. Whereas, it is expedient to amend the Procedure of the Supreme Court of Civil Justice; Be it therefore enacted by the Governor on behalf of Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Council and Assembly of Vancouver Island and its Dependencies, as follows: ...","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Governor; Supreme court; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Civil procedure; Legislation; Civil rights","score_opus":0.03848622223458657,"score_gpt":0.305923607294494,"score_spread":0.26743738505990744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6923635745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8324792,0.0006172222,0.0000012052536,0.02045812,0.0000843832,0.0039370083,0.0006452552,0.0000053753633,0.14177226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9407006,0.0002505214,0.000008509685,0.0007816412,0.000028192588,0.00018273592,7.7708154e-7,0.000013394833,0.058033638],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772537,0.00040800413,0.00033749937,0.00032605798,0.0009462465,0.00025683607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973772,0.0009417913,0.00045838498,0.00031333722,0.0008355041,0.00007379292],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009558084,0.00023103853,0.0003677389,0.00001539145,0.002078291,0.00015188157,0.00058020616,0.0000925167,0.00006392149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000737902,0.00008631957,0.000043377524,0.00084032584,0.0014474997,0.00020120855,0.0003362204,0.00021399897,1.2028126e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003566483,0.00020412377,0.0035115452,0.00007351154,0.00022933513,3.1547654e-7,0.22792488,0.000010816961,0.0018877977,0.000078258294,0.7656812,0.000041557432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023428043,0.0021838876,0.011770124,0.00077869487,0.00081219815,0.000023215782,0.71716344,0.00012262768,0.0023248896,0.000103752755,0.26196325,0.0004111297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22608063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95662916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7305485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020770647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074270245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6959482345","doi":"10.71860/kr.v33i1.122597","title":"Jesus Christus, das Leben der Welt, in Feier und Bekenntnis von Vancouver","year":2025,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen - Open Journals - Ökumenische Rundschau","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Context (archaeology); Relation (database); Identity (music)","score_opus":0.03828968237977179,"score_gpt":0.3695081568436442,"score_spread":0.3312184744638724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6959482345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13956568,0.19297515,0.0007926326,0.058984075,0.015961254,0.007932816,0.00055332686,0.0004052416,0.58282983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7180065,0.07515109,0.0050048847,0.0037666631,0.0024508582,0.00007434543,0.00008061906,0.00025676622,0.1952083],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904315,0.0018164209,0.0016481346,0.0017632245,0.0018285774,0.0025121365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99514824,0.0008230395,0.0012529289,0.0010263815,0.0008307211,0.0009187013],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004047575,0.0012588584,0.0019553257,0.0039948146,0.0049272054,0.0038513455,0.0050736987,0.0010220661,0.0055713225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006199139,0.0012171112,0.0006818185,0.012598189,0.0011587067,0.0072542587,0.0037571623,0.0022765845,0.00079602207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013792082,0.0018867094,0.0484587,0.00035542448,0.011607102,0.0011587413,0.097198956,0.0005305832,0.0016665194,0.016364511,0.80625993,0.013133632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004937125,0.00018473603,0.00540089,0.0013930807,0.0017557725,0.0000031747206,0.05149281,0.00016698358,0.00034080647,0.0014927558,0.9312157,0.001616164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03812499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041154277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5784408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028684805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017200287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6960850172","doi":"10.14288/1.0370688","title":"Proclamation. By His Excellency James Douglas, Governor and Commander-in-Chief of her Majesty's Colony of British Columbia and its Dependencies. Proclamation, having the Force of Law to declare that English Law is in force in British Columbia. Whereas, by an Act of Parliament passed in the Session held in the 21st and 22nd years of her Majesty Queen Victoria, it was enacted that the Territories therein described...","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Governor; Parliament; English law; Proclamation; Queen (butterfly); Common law; Doctrine; Criminal law","score_opus":0.019438173503279654,"score_gpt":0.26083731910769337,"score_spread":0.24139914560441372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6960850172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908751,0.00064717827,0.0000013474487,0.0009814701,0.00007194203,0.0031286767,0.00025346546,0.0000054442526,0.004035345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958852,0.00068533816,0.000042602234,0.00012855443,0.000025595804,0.00038463518,0.000009335765,0.000012406962,0.0028263463],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975174,0.0008598161,0.000555545,0.0002826751,0.00053005747,0.00025448765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984033,0.0007074599,0.0003712867,0.0001959,0.00028386357,0.000038149497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013854298,0.000121745856,0.00042149433,0.000022997694,0.00081416906,0.0007742721,0.000514082,0.00015561207,0.00005161428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031446104,0.000114613715,0.000034676897,0.0007693603,0.00070089457,0.00066831533,0.00019046661,0.00021944055,3.864857e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009682131,0.000642068,0.6666521,0.00020253155,0.00006313769,0.0000021664616,0.28584912,0.000007616117,0.00042437005,0.000121951016,0.045037284,0.0009008074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021189589,0.00035513993,0.5928265,0.0013665385,0.000046492252,0.000004083534,0.38730645,0.000057147776,0.0004145614,0.00060676003,0.014628181,0.00026917018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95579624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99690104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.101457335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019452067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011727883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74663234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6961263571","doi":"10.14288/1.0348112","title":"Constitution and by-laws of the Native Sons of British Columbia : as amended and adopted by the Grand Post, June 21, 1902","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Government (linguistics); Subject (documents); Prime minister","score_opus":0.011205693999476221,"score_gpt":0.2165818075414972,"score_spread":0.20537611354202098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6961263571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899692,0.0007300696,0.0000046116083,0.0014384836,0.00012447436,0.0005086406,0.0011068807,0.000016083079,0.00610157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99348223,0.0008983947,0.00003071428,0.000036439178,0.000013140859,0.0000010301574,0.00000676303,0.0000038202716,0.0055274665],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988496,0.00017661409,0.00013386167,0.00025728275,0.0003721379,0.0002105188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988369,0.00011109336,0.00038458733,0.00018061209,0.00040102706,0.00008582285],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003408356,0.000044737473,0.0002978836,0.0000062875824,0.0029695698,0.00030185678,0.0004389275,0.00011746852,0.00004652609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031048473,0.000106396656,0.0000894007,0.000118763885,0.006170061,0.0004019855,0.00027579605,0.00013900363,6.2468985e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000721486,0.00057929236,0.2923699,0.00028771273,0.00078956824,0.00005202579,0.03408081,8.800633e-7,0.0043269577,0.00018448422,0.27375847,0.39349774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011256252,0.000050914055,0.9635703,0.00017905586,0.00009266591,0.000011165099,0.029391058,0.0000044248272,0.0000057086404,0.00030720796,0.0051264376,0.00013546969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91983974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97550917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6712004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076339114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011481447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99832845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6977797227","doi":"10.7939/r3-5jss-aj67","title":"On the Right(s) Path: A Study of Human Rights Law and Practice in British Columbia","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"University of Alberta Library","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Fundamental rights; Commission; International human rights law; Reservation of rights; Right to property; Statute; Legislation; Linguistic rights","score_opus":0.010704252935211545,"score_gpt":0.24522441902124634,"score_spread":0.2345201660860348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6977797227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7119645,0.00007462768,2.0412299e-9,0.0003579395,0.000058826532,0.00047320052,0.000008877428,0.000009771868,0.28705224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94348985,0.00007986159,0.00001252256,0.000055467863,0.000016994838,0.0000015313295,0.00007487107,0.000007796371,0.056261115],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983507,0.00070723466,0.00015573668,0.0002506182,0.00039469812,0.0001410541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772376,0.0017609696,0.00030285298,0.00012477965,0.00004469039,0.000042920983],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018008875,0.00009221262,0.0002871355,0.000031048552,0.0019324321,0.00008940702,0.00039804206,0.00011428723,0.0025713688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013822249,0.00011434486,0.00006307313,0.00022979677,0.00029593435,0.00058626174,0.00012735988,0.000289232,0.0000017812104],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016569936,0.0014137338,0.005885724,0.00007212686,0.00029581427,0.00014085979,0.8969115,0.0000015120053,0.0000052397168,0.06368888,0.031299256,0.00011964401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081343896,0.00039491546,0.05843271,0.00017727958,0.0001475308,5.784505e-7,0.7895625,7.910966e-7,0.0000029470032,0.0021916938,0.14801416,0.00026144457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9297499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9850567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23152533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050488063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049678212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6977866302","doi":"10.7939/r3-grvy-ez64","title":"Vexatious Litigants, Meads, and the Hermeticism of Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"University of Alberta Library","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Alienation; Surprise; Class (philosophy); Relation (database); Function (biology)","score_opus":0.009981288153577883,"score_gpt":0.227700458519944,"score_spread":0.21771917036636612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6977866302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37872756,0.0013885597,9.6671265e-8,0.002662355,0.00020548607,0.00033584543,0.000017132572,0.000020536183,0.6166424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75421524,0.0026474115,0.00014064275,0.0001123491,0.00005226121,8.0062944e-7,0.00021405013,0.000014366837,0.24260287],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989679,0.00027072313,0.0001333367,0.00016824817,0.00032088798,0.00013890165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988552,0.00065292313,0.0002831612,0.00011617641,0.000043449305,0.000049114795],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011702082,0.00011414079,0.00032251468,0.000035494304,0.00087427715,0.000019335552,0.00041199636,0.00012630316,0.0018769508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000872742,0.00009687611,0.00012952549,0.0001443394,0.0010004615,0.0003241612,0.00013658481,0.00015992107,0.0000029715357],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002527525,0.000038009737,0.00046296432,0.00011618459,0.00021401013,0.0000037637228,0.5430065,0.0000013899161,0.00001237683,0.44944417,0.005720496,0.0007273646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012428707,0.00005104262,0.006052141,0.00011224859,0.00029694012,3.065366e-7,0.35765663,0.000005571269,0.00015918998,0.0035227123,0.6306101,0.00029022037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11238052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03179382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6248896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025962958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010735168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6979726935","doi":"","title":"Accepting the Unacceptable: Trinity Western University, Religious Freedom, and the Meaning of Liberal Constitutionalism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Meaning (existential); Conformity; Freedom of religion; State (computer science); Supreme court; Liberalism; Public reason","score_opus":0.023721619889679833,"score_gpt":0.27016372768589125,"score_spread":0.24644210779621142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6979726935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8727366,0.0012900981,0.000016647942,0.014492029,0.0006723023,0.0007437689,0.000060211143,0.000113352755,0.109875016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99669355,0.00023456948,0.00013140083,0.0005314654,0.00021331635,0.000010747054,0.0000031462596,0.000005412003,0.0021763633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797255,0.0008128701,0.00019260882,0.00019777265,0.0005531866,0.00027101915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987673,0.0007024543,0.00018017084,0.00015812682,0.000112813315,0.000079139834],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013124078,0.00011226711,0.00021492265,0.00001710451,0.0048966384,0.00010663333,0.00056401937,0.000044403358,0.0002925374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035256302,0.0000727833,0.00009816182,0.00031335428,0.002362194,0.00025488113,0.000726335,0.00041031055,0.000008594273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009712835,0.000030682648,0.027376091,0.00000954449,0.00011453758,0.000009062473,0.034882188,0.00039902003,0.000037488386,0.9324262,0.004290821,0.00032719542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004406121,0.0000682524,0.024267994,0.00004194766,0.00020979477,0.000014827164,0.12764433,0.000056979152,0.000042203144,0.010707182,0.83205813,0.0004822093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04817765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0126010515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9217191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020691182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011703999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99639887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6979757777","doi":"","title":"Addressing the Needs of Self-Represented Litigants in the Canadian Justice System","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Economic Justice; Service (business); Service provider; Legal service; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.12555843437848763,"score_gpt":0.36204168396397723,"score_spread":0.2364832495854896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6979757777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6271074,0.0006886383,0.0000026632715,0.010835775,0.00046407833,0.0005112889,0.00000460338,0.00005709191,0.3603285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987625,0.000017355365,0.000047381578,0.00028869478,0.00030155468,0.00001755034,5.5729555e-7,0.0000034920229,0.0005608969],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845743,0.000493309,0.00016328145,0.000057625002,0.00037491933,0.00045345837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916536,0.00042732316,0.00006341872,0.00013364284,0.000099003715,0.00011125556],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014748458,0.00007330478,0.00011406942,0.00003612837,0.0013588702,0.00007834177,0.00036823435,0.00006666965,0.000040064304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039191812,0.000034341603,0.000041042975,0.0005048745,0.000240875,0.00018694904,0.000037020985,0.00013378449,0.000025313322],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024045378,0.000040268842,0.078820676,0.00007434943,0.000049720875,0.0000017647031,0.79933155,0.0000062659774,0.000025054973,0.11588501,0.0053502303,0.0004127072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009886697,0.000003847192,0.12792973,0.00004561502,0.00007701472,0.0000010848817,0.85006076,0.0000437064,0.000036778547,0.000012593724,0.021605073,0.00008491391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8712807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8291381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37165517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003289224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000117084746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980079240","doi":"","title":"Attitudes towards moral standards in the adjudication of the Supreme Court of Canada from 1982 to 2002","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Moral standards; Confidentiality","score_opus":0.027279885782125406,"score_gpt":0.30612257999302767,"score_spread":0.27884269421090224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980079240","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012225156,0.00015917871,0.004991694,0.0074319146,0.0009147056,0.010115192,0.0020829702,0.000083858,0.97299796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7541389,0.0012733185,0.02607709,0.0064306925,0.00041004596,0.0045788414,0.0005067956,0.00021565177,0.2063687],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964328,0.0005222789,0.00063988514,0.0002280919,0.0018110787,0.0003658709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810284,0.00008363466,0.00065156893,0.0004680387,0.00060166954,0.00009223829],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004399032,0.00023663274,0.00038583553,0.00017039855,0.0004104535,0.00016634524,0.0012631111,0.00026241178,0.0011517064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015986111,0.00015542515,0.00010536351,0.0009733215,0.0005565463,0.00064139883,0.000165977,0.00033664025,0.000007412855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010437237,0.000041161893,0.0010548452,0.0001445717,0.00003753406,7.8853566e-7,0.017145885,0.00009621726,0.00009466323,0.011178942,0.96652263,0.0036723183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015885581,0.000008375652,0.005595886,0.0005942204,0.000019044626,3.5967454e-7,0.0018347776,0.000010167786,0.0016310583,0.00012334538,0.98981225,0.00021164663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7642723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91173595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7666293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011283552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035540876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980293843","doi":"","title":"The Boundaries of the Criminal Law: the Criminalization\\nof the Non-disclosure of HIV","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Criminal law; Supreme court; Contradiction; Punishment (psychology); Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Sentence","score_opus":0.028007062725832265,"score_gpt":0.28418093004570133,"score_spread":0.2561738673198691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980293843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8279555,0.004658359,0.000047624908,0.057528168,0.0015960276,0.0015079654,0.000061248575,0.000073517745,0.106571615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924286,0.00034828563,0.00005812716,0.00082823954,0.0003891815,0.000048507696,0.0000019410356,0.000013141459,0.005883994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973187,0.00060591364,0.00042503595,0.00020831364,0.0010282263,0.00041379879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978207,0.00076019554,0.00034714202,0.0005468371,0.00045454773,0.000070630944],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010195429,0.00019138657,0.00025577637,0.0000074904065,0.011269389,0.00024383923,0.0013363068,0.00010119723,0.00013028242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000910085,0.00007352821,0.00025593018,0.00033731174,0.010340917,0.000241561,0.00027085203,0.0003442715,0.00003220878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041147294,0.00006474303,0.009322203,0.00003778677,0.00013210623,0.0000016308686,0.11332714,0.000045583784,0.0002033561,0.84255916,0.03408983,0.00017531744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035642678,0.00005064494,0.07600696,0.00007613397,0.00020613676,0.000004756958,0.074405774,0.000018566936,0.0018069743,0.0062588905,0.8405742,0.00023451484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03718227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052563597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83630025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097913435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99235237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980709153","doi":"","title":"Connecting Grounds of Discrimination to Real People's Real Experiences","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislation; Mistake; Human rights; Supreme court; Statute; Statutory law; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.025589233607948285,"score_gpt":0.31322382804228954,"score_spread":0.28763459443434125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980709153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8306139,0.000058647933,0.000007254614,0.0018202086,0.000244895,0.00025430668,0.0000049265336,0.000107695,0.16688816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949503,0.00028437306,0.00069833215,0.00012082363,0.000416781,0.00007404337,0.000005754123,0.000010984171,0.0034385966],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998158,0.00020212113,0.00031688088,0.0003151175,0.0005907199,0.00041717815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917966,0.00018727752,0.00010533727,0.0001553658,0.00015019356,0.0002221623],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050680694,0.00014947097,0.00027032444,0.000026749498,0.0012350141,0.00013509307,0.00032429764,0.00010021297,0.0016716429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033253047,0.00012837039,0.00009320276,0.00037515565,0.00023297215,0.00055380503,0.000060358347,0.00012594592,0.00013404743],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007004565,0.00011915324,0.013561672,0.000034203324,0.000046020465,0.000004668156,0.83297634,0.000060789203,0.0010830347,0.13252115,0.0014422241,0.018080723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006397244,0.00027610274,0.1348415,0.00013497735,0.00005556223,0.0000017138258,0.7780276,0.000033798002,0.0012243146,0.0016507659,0.08237082,0.000743136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26309738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22585897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16433641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022522965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004438188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6983028986","doi":"","title":"Law and Society Activities in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.016525827719425953,"score_gpt":0.2696620604232158,"score_spread":0.2531362327037898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6983028986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84762794,0.00066285755,0.0000035534576,0.0016719312,0.00030350217,0.0002012679,0.000009074814,0.00004692562,0.14947297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955525,0.00015655013,0.00032461708,0.002373988,0.0002496772,0.000009382473,0.0000014204749,0.0000078550565,0.0013240537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986054,0.000074269665,0.00017755906,0.00021677538,0.0004058104,0.00052022317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999356,0.00025839085,0.00005325707,0.00008989291,0.00004038865,0.00020212326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058485265,0.00012617861,0.00019255062,0.000007526607,0.00088853907,0.000083487976,0.00014723213,0.00008466938,0.00012388728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000081582046,0.00011246333,0.000050186307,0.00015313957,0.00048080678,0.00033964528,0.00007545557,0.0002502333,0.0000098118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035758694,0.00007267266,0.14283082,0.00006740527,0.00012546738,0.00006251383,0.06011397,0.000014924586,0.00068492326,0.7752883,0.017316148,0.0033871224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063496706,0.000019652289,0.12821689,0.000048518395,0.00001571963,0.0000011452227,0.124421634,0.0000072269513,0.00074981275,0.0014457077,0.74394983,0.00048887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7738426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011206333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002744859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6834014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6983058555","doi":"","title":"The Legal Framework of Canada's Health Care System","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Health care; Malpractice; Tort; Health law; Private practice; Dental care; Dental insurance","score_opus":0.010462695552955995,"score_gpt":0.2735725876205358,"score_spread":0.26310989206757984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6983058555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6165651,0.020617096,0.000016796832,0.04224274,0.00627363,0.002298414,0.000111457564,0.00028484472,0.31158993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947084,0.00007547957,0.00021205917,0.00062598375,0.00036736112,0.000020028443,0.0000022023742,0.000010837883,0.003977626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782413,0.0003075617,0.00030217526,0.0002204078,0.000779907,0.0005658315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987007,0.00035001087,0.00019780317,0.00028698868,0.00022889646,0.00023560811],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053818873,0.00013377304,0.00029414063,0.0000073143005,0.001977175,0.00011200318,0.00046225954,0.00009862528,0.0000768879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028586786,0.00008899079,0.00008743573,0.00019210415,0.00024793533,0.00012830064,0.000085545944,0.00030827973,0.00006641166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016201264,0.000009241589,0.008044843,0.00015695921,0.000065528926,0.0000031186044,0.014777299,0.000028862345,0.000008748905,0.9594154,0.016735967,0.0007378541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001506955,0.000036822148,0.0066579776,0.0001614743,0.000007923369,4.1321783e-7,0.116243325,0.0000031863774,0.000040597948,0.000109503984,0.8764277,0.00016035268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9587642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97558266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013729084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001135141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6983742416","doi":"","title":"A new paradigm for protecting autonomi and the right to legal capacity. Advancing Substantive Equality for Persons with Disabilities through Law, Policy and Practice. Law Commission of Ontario","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Mental capacity; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Set (abstract data type); Process (computing); Convention; Human rights; Legislation","score_opus":0.06997788008983295,"score_gpt":0.35504404837574854,"score_spread":0.2850661682859156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6983742416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013150343,0.00022470872,0.016777704,0.039499197,0.00007593595,0.012185378,0.0010286652,0.00007486777,0.9169832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22018617,0.0002573334,0.37234473,0.00019928919,0.0008639739,0.0001228514,0.000046518966,0.00020189474,0.40577722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997599,0.0008996272,0.00012599034,0.00038349116,0.00048714151,0.0005047234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925691,0.006549341,0.00024986741,0.00019827067,0.00022466913,0.00020876479],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022565871,0.00017896021,0.0004950407,0.00008506362,0.0026784411,0.00005827157,0.0003465555,0.00013460491,0.00005962552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002515976,0.00013214494,0.000109067216,0.00016090838,0.0056548263,0.00037225796,0.0002715666,0.000602248,5.192647e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012459471,0.000033431425,0.00006838581,0.00020295175,0.00016754284,7.238358e-7,0.3904462,6.772141e-7,0.00007519946,0.6046861,0.002766233,0.00030662894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014222374,0.00028862702,0.00017598862,0.00024059563,0.000059423415,0.0000010795833,0.16657926,0.000009743738,0.000022561433,0.012198126,0.81883544,0.00016689791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93957645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9691999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81606925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044339505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091001525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986225024","doi":"","title":"The Ottawa Treaty on the path to customary law status","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"E-resource repository of the University of Latvia (University of Latvia)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Path (computing); Meaning (existential); Customary international law; Common law","score_opus":0.012707100279718444,"score_gpt":0.2186250782519571,"score_spread":0.20591797797223865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986225024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63426834,0.00036695626,0.0000048023508,0.009439469,0.0005270153,0.0010462942,0.00009526562,0.00008038597,0.35417145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90947986,0.00017423328,0.0001518311,0.00008136769,0.0001048895,2.0945066e-7,0.000021229504,0.000023188544,0.0899632],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966958,0.00084994617,0.00027008852,0.00045984046,0.0012602462,0.00046406809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969836,0.0007058999,0.0010105415,0.0006617372,0.00040453963,0.00023367845],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004958127,0.0003315297,0.0006319165,0.00007130843,0.005950532,0.00003336986,0.0022338,0.0003693776,0.00009154001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017016192,0.00025181557,0.0007600737,0.000507123,0.0019988983,0.00013075143,0.00042053964,0.000604334,0.000027647007],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031318075,0.0004003836,0.0040315264,0.000567488,0.0025371998,0.00013160937,0.7832186,0.00031380905,0.0042215534,0.05370763,0.14405587,0.0036825244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000495741,0.00018508239,0.033123244,0.0004043369,0.00050846825,6.958842e-7,0.28583187,0.00002502741,0.0005083268,0.00009152274,0.67847294,0.00035277285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038756765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023589501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53441703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050121703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026445775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986301819","doi":"","title":"Paths to Justice and the Resolution of Consumer Problems: Findings from the 2014 Everyday Legal Problems and the Costs of Civil Justice in Canada National Survey","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Ethnic group; Value (mathematics); Resolution (logic); Civil rights; Dispute resolution; Legal culture","score_opus":0.024941541147955232,"score_gpt":0.26373705718055385,"score_spread":0.2387955160325986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986301819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9670484,0.0039066793,0.0000299032,0.023610912,0.00039881788,0.0015608544,0.00039962947,0.000012491391,0.0030322901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800634,0.0008325434,0.000040288076,0.00063506555,0.0000845338,0.00007087844,0.0000037557452,0.000006325724,0.00032026548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715537,0.0012337462,0.00037310392,0.00023581443,0.0007264836,0.0002754922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931541,0.0060174954,0.00019611907,0.0001409334,0.00040732065,0.00008400562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037855175,0.00013249154,0.00027627344,0.000013322458,0.0007249396,0.000065845226,0.0003221861,0.00006282085,0.000046172056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052186814,0.000056559194,0.00003316213,0.00021305511,0.0015027707,0.00022424311,0.00015629978,0.00017551088,0.0000054277252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017023726,0.00012783866,0.33933496,0.00028775487,0.0005179528,0.0000033949043,0.08148559,0.0004992486,0.0011949814,0.44193715,0.13141884,0.0014899314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0075437403,0.000049237882,0.9025633,0.00068015937,0.00039038202,0.0000015898619,0.016742071,0.00017514263,0.00009057948,0.0039734165,0.06734084,0.00044954475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98416144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99726963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56322837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039568776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004481419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6247626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986597370","doi":"","title":"Proving Intra-Racial Discrimination in the U.S. and Canada: The Room for Making the Artificial Distinction Between Genealogical Relatedness and Race","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Expansive; Interpretation (philosophy); Race (biology); Order (exchange); Root (linguistics); Judicial interpretation","score_opus":0.04709062148446246,"score_gpt":0.30936774023731195,"score_spread":0.2622771187528495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986597370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9634084,0.00021025106,0.000050199556,0.034546155,0.0002913731,0.0008638941,0.00001517945,0.00003792259,0.0005766336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987134,0.000040051265,0.00002694291,0.00024315523,0.0007050054,0.00013285929,0.000010368496,0.000006218632,0.000122020894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985778,0.0003710664,0.00019813469,0.00020935644,0.00034483452,0.00029883295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988079,0.00092605304,0.000087499655,0.00008534863,0.000053693006,0.000039512517],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015056495,0.000104023115,0.00012806409,0.000011035272,0.0030707144,0.00027171237,0.00020083552,0.000080166545,0.000005233703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010359307,0.000050374547,0.000028004895,0.00023251203,0.0003420356,0.00017709023,0.000083358034,0.00026058103,0.0000020007556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015171492,0.00006592367,0.21643043,0.00013463457,0.00013625849,0.00002160236,0.27280486,0.00020191548,0.00027239163,0.4096528,0.008758057,0.091369405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022833224,0.000030023171,0.85789204,0.000038119688,0.000073308074,9.683404e-7,0.073230736,0.00036119024,0.000024860055,0.0074196435,0.060495496,0.0002052686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42934284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95302093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6414616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018648288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008078832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986616084","doi":"","title":"Professor Emeritus Kent McNeil to serve as the Law Foundation of Saskatchewan H. Robert Arscott Chair at University of Saskatchewan College of Law from July 1 to December 31","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Work (physics); George (robot)","score_opus":0.017812262862625574,"score_gpt":0.2742131930104344,"score_spread":0.25640093014780885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986616084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95074165,0.00003161714,0.000013933057,0.0081833685,0.00028343423,0.0015215052,0.00016770682,0.000036681242,0.039020132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9574163,0.000008695966,0.0010058746,0.0005449386,0.000046645368,0.0000068275267,0.000014232324,0.000010476474,0.040946003],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804854,0.00024307433,0.00036096526,0.00033869446,0.0006733407,0.00033539324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985182,0.0002652739,0.00026685072,0.00031421133,0.00047929905,0.00015613933],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004389597,0.00018681791,0.00046962374,0.00002464554,0.00055297476,0.000012662158,0.0005009075,0.00013899367,0.00094332604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054248758,0.00014001904,0.00016788,0.00036845845,0.0004832918,0.00022870835,0.00041329095,0.000107210144,0.00022271989],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005598278,0.00042206811,0.007643732,0.00010682865,0.0004381014,0.0000027542721,0.92585576,0.00011719144,0.025664644,0.028882489,0.009941252,0.0003653406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010807156,0.00033831692,0.015265411,0.00014704812,0.0001161223,2.519138e-7,0.70246935,0.000013644952,0.02454241,0.000789433,0.2548199,0.00041742844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53213704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83476907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.302632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038893078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021711897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986989800","doi":"","title":"Robbed of Their Families'? Fathers' Rights Discourses in Canadian Parenting Law Reform Processes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law reform; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Family law; International human rights law","score_opus":0.01472167221316496,"score_gpt":0.26958811593031723,"score_spread":0.2548664437171523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986989800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7110389,0.0009895536,6.7964396e-7,0.0012580733,0.00018745185,0.0003531925,0.00004277369,0.00006796721,0.28606144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99768865,0.00008086121,0.00013380461,0.00013647486,0.0002965097,0.000045589135,0.000017511473,0.000013988809,0.0015866304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979867,0.00012214431,0.00038503064,0.00030958484,0.00039026263,0.0008062955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910927,0.0001112562,0.00015758921,0.00017307153,0.0002100921,0.00023873405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004232321,0.00021525906,0.00034372523,0.000057697816,0.0011821623,0.00012572357,0.0003993263,0.00014275493,0.00012947476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001364378,0.00015483345,0.00008859117,0.00049125915,0.0007161956,0.0005717843,0.000053392145,0.00021206982,0.000034692624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002436255,0.00021660422,0.09569876,0.00017542973,0.00008776356,0.00002353698,0.042577885,0.000096130025,0.0003308953,0.85928786,0.00093732664,0.0005434231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010022966,0.00006391133,0.050318938,0.0004920816,0.000048184058,0.0000010434692,0.07243076,0.000017988677,0.0044999635,0.016462278,0.85368025,0.0009823096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8527429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008475911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032188054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90923566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987230599","doi":"","title":"Sexual Assault in Canada : Law, legal pratice and women’s activism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; State (computer science); Sexual violence; Face (sociological concept); Victory; Legislation; Law reform","score_opus":0.07506848413431826,"score_gpt":0.3842518239960574,"score_spread":0.3091833398617391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987230599","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043696124,0.00021552692,0.0000013765043,0.0006693336,0.0008224497,0.0016364971,0.000010286779,0.000034414632,0.952914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37020615,0.00012635427,0.0000748657,0.00046995396,0.00036832123,0.0003500123,0.000095182804,0.000050484083,0.6282587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964765,0.00044885423,0.0006584425,0.0005814883,0.0011667684,0.00066798023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976721,0.0006765196,0.00078671885,0.00029370407,0.0002848871,0.00028611114],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013283049,0.00042929288,0.0009110841,0.000099111814,0.00090124336,0.0015058973,0.0018460526,0.00019075512,0.0029526548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035901007,0.00041794378,0.000046503763,0.00014144935,0.00069764204,0.005170592,0.0011853749,0.00059187226,0.00007177549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034662228,0.00036682872,0.042301096,0.0008332021,0.0014692926,0.000071382725,0.065390706,0.000013864047,0.00010740834,0.58761996,0.041616734,0.2598629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040277035,0.000016224818,0.027671764,0.00010551681,0.000047309666,6.6304125e-7,0.004059987,0.0000027134572,0.000017093445,0.0007126824,0.9664155,0.0005477354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9808564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99430096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9247988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066946954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072370702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987237254","doi":"","title":"Social Enterprise, Law and Legal Education","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social enterprise; Social economy; Revenue; Product (mathematics); Population; Enterprise software; Social policy; Legal research","score_opus":0.03285351891063463,"score_gpt":0.3718201482977051,"score_spread":0.33896662938707045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987237254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18361475,0.000071405775,0.0000033610945,0.022611232,0.00030093413,0.00011023637,7.605681e-7,0.000039889375,0.79324746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729144,0.000043200907,0.00016250317,0.0006143831,0.00058205775,0.000010042564,5.87986e-7,0.0000025482238,0.025670264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949694,0.000035557907,0.000061438375,0.000110191024,0.00015013128,0.00014577333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997405,0.000019045014,0.000055437227,0.000067547284,0.00006429316,0.000053207183],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013892286,0.000052412364,0.00007436843,0.0000050738604,0.004538534,0.00042086016,0.00015426942,0.000047905025,0.000098473225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011711642,0.000041368647,0.000028458064,0.000012425746,0.0006134358,0.0004503,0.00007949593,0.000050491803,0.000032363394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029528878,0.000028564253,0.005945888,0.0000033525434,0.000011597853,4.2910307e-7,0.014049203,6.4078187e-9,0.000034243014,0.9581169,0.011631164,0.01017574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012495683,0.0000070819756,0.09766937,0.0000053060103,0.000010413674,2.4360952e-7,0.012222208,0.0000010739511,0.000038426486,0.0022906307,0.8875164,0.00011390509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06695233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026615908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9558262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058114772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000451004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99675745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989327346","doi":"","title":"Anchoring Lifeline Criminal Jurisprudence: Making the Leap from Theory to Critical Race-Inspired Jurisprudence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Power (physics); Criminal offence; Criminal law; Race (biology)","score_opus":0.04501025431994587,"score_gpt":0.36368664785370053,"score_spread":0.31867639353375465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989327346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91827273,0.0035572436,0.0011830928,0.056921173,0.003692389,0.001224081,0.00008509231,0.0013647531,0.01369946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98589146,0.0002892183,0.0022280025,0.0031002301,0.0044191903,0.00017957203,0.000006671831,0.000040568535,0.0038451138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995422,0.00079089345,0.0005126597,0.0007500264,0.0013515458,0.001172885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962263,0.0023626585,0.00011158284,0.000512504,0.00032728302,0.0004596443],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023333344,0.00034726853,0.00043380936,0.000060367554,0.0036777323,0.0006161154,0.0012488468,0.00021896132,0.0006603412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006714387,0.00025786003,0.0002145657,0.000935466,0.0010540701,0.00064866326,0.00059809856,0.0007086576,0.0027663766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037615444,0.00023948499,0.017687557,0.00014264257,0.0003258281,0.00034805527,0.15257826,0.00041414518,0.0050679278,0.6952704,0.10425113,0.0232984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072693155,0.00015933061,0.07638738,0.00074097136,0.00030830252,0.000003025883,0.08740775,0.00019095863,0.0010944576,0.025018418,0.80648535,0.0014771376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011690839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008095816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7022342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003463293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014450093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989809335","doi":"","title":"Canada and the Rule of Law: 150 Years After Confederation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Rule of law; Legislation; Human rights; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.016663194888243364,"score_gpt":0.27186265242218255,"score_spread":0.2551994575339392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989809335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9048141,0.00041397693,0.0000012470716,0.009720461,0.00032843256,0.00027866315,0.000020407273,0.000015024097,0.084407635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962176,0.000055510358,0.00006472834,0.0010065613,0.00019122029,0.00002344667,0.0000010041655,0.0000042278916,0.0024357028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917907,0.00010062751,0.00012554976,0.00012253558,0.00029805518,0.00017417537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945,0.0000932421,0.00010962903,0.0001781857,0.000089559304,0.00007934519],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032815142,0.00007075318,0.00014946026,0.00000283517,0.001565049,0.00026866843,0.00020518266,0.000048836027,0.00014214027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027637574,0.00004776479,0.000035325338,0.00001048425,0.001087569,0.00024471828,0.00008416223,0.00009931764,0.000012858571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071419076,0.000016048987,0.018408637,0.00001822608,0.000076775126,0.000009299361,0.012989185,0.0000023932075,0.00011718191,0.9635178,0.003984186,0.00078884524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013402588,0.000014750724,0.27703992,0.00004126104,0.000041729334,5.2694634e-7,0.0028787402,0.000008614115,0.0003645967,0.0038300941,0.7142052,0.00023430426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9596877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008147773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001227247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990007197","doi":"","title":"A comparative jurisdictional analysis of the criminalisation of the sexual transmission/exposure of HIV: a new legislative framework","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Government (linguistics); Pretext; Circumstantial evidence; Legislation; Tort; Work (physics); Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.12328689299599799,"score_gpt":0.393998680937655,"score_spread":0.270711787941657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990007197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96310776,0.0005383391,0.00009192493,0.001441081,0.0004300112,0.001518016,0.00038982744,0.00002915018,0.032453872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96092814,0.00020179358,0.00022917803,0.0000067755723,0.0002764781,0.0000051482166,0.00019569845,0.000020165713,0.038136628],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99194837,0.0028493886,0.00072773546,0.000564298,0.003391379,0.00051885674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923992,0.0013432013,0.0012155982,0.00063254184,0.0041634673,0.0002459823],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017079606,0.00034936672,0.0011230842,0.0007298202,0.0014429573,0.00004242423,0.0017795827,0.00064455176,0.00026300282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092409196,0.00024465585,0.00083500735,0.006352004,0.002011159,0.00028267858,0.00022012081,0.0013845761,0.000003808821],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017394102,0.00046653883,0.08775587,0.00030420593,0.007830513,0.0000055526853,0.84253424,0.0015033769,0.0006555976,0.04993641,0.0031579672,0.0041103004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016144337,0.00036498925,0.61710405,0.00092224905,0.0057405075,3.787741e-7,0.30007437,0.0003043399,0.00071493874,0.005107396,0.06732815,0.000724185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040661864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11713518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5424599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005507953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040111486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990053523","doi":"","title":"The Companies We Keep: Corporate Governance for a Democratic Society","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Pretext; Circumstantial evidence; Subpoena; Subject (documents); Gloom","score_opus":0.058364127877910725,"score_gpt":0.3088698155957502,"score_spread":0.2505056877178395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990053523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81879216,0.0020869798,0.00008518602,0.16532096,0.0006523373,0.004884122,0.000025255862,0.00095754577,0.00719543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737565,0.0024668437,0.00013852623,0.0003708915,0.0005288864,0.0000060321413,0.00003234426,0.00014169462,0.022558272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762714,0.000437848,0.0002960131,0.0003334647,0.00070241565,0.00060313963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998232,0.0002905694,0.00024496473,0.00024506444,0.00083735166,0.00015004612],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001710109,0.00015810652,0.00016156473,0.000014898374,0.008996642,0.0010290546,0.000926946,0.000057394915,0.0005010984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009253711,0.00011969034,0.00013283954,0.00043754734,0.0008300517,0.000574097,0.00042982615,0.00018849893,0.00071264413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006896901,0.00011750639,0.00022319633,0.00009751724,0.00019667424,0.0000010816724,0.035014592,0.00015248804,0.000066155706,0.8283314,0.1281388,0.0075915838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082178216,0.00010687493,0.0023781739,0.000045007677,0.00002931791,8.9682777e-7,0.010743697,0.00007377605,0.0001330651,0.023707999,0.96168804,0.000271341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014271634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021714129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83354926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070629705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033638844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9923197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990130995","doi":"","title":"Constitutionalism and Exclusion","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Subject (documents); Derogation; Context (archaeology); Legitimacy","score_opus":0.03826820113509239,"score_gpt":0.30754471040311776,"score_spread":0.2692765092680254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990130995","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38124603,0.014555715,0.00018671934,0.03880412,0.0028319121,0.0004555005,0.000038122118,0.0001450457,0.5617368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98928136,0.0031750964,0.0005249202,0.0007640166,0.0013015909,0.0000150264095,0.000004835063,0.000012745338,0.004920423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977736,0.0004852564,0.00026845015,0.00037563857,0.00055075187,0.00054633344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865323,0.0006505004,0.0001274076,0.0001697409,0.00015685816,0.00024225775],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009088173,0.00025553865,0.00035188452,0.000027208242,0.0015986335,0.000117606156,0.00025234604,0.00023962629,0.0010438142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079970853,0.00020863705,0.00010584102,0.000231366,0.003356656,0.00037290377,0.00029713943,0.0002442997,0.0007680426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065977656,0.00006465893,0.0022602866,0.000044737168,0.000054472846,0.0000041325384,0.036972914,0.0000106425,0.00018356314,0.9374497,0.0016124649,0.021335859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040473798,0.000044410768,0.007826542,0.00016465008,0.00007940569,0.0000068665313,0.011665026,0.00016001143,0.00009134465,0.013421447,0.965797,0.00033854265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03240334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022179503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9641845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022113844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000537716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990469418","doi":"","title":"Diana Ginn: Resolving Conflicts Between Freedom of Religion and LGBTQ Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Freedom of religion; Autonomy; Supreme court; Religious freedom; First amendment","score_opus":0.02912035656091781,"score_gpt":0.2963427770853943,"score_spread":0.2672224205244765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990469418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95735574,0.0013431417,0.000004997231,0.0038567139,0.00034666827,0.00039741717,0.000031679327,0.00028850656,0.036375128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99399674,0.0006366053,0.00029273413,0.000116381125,0.00064625277,0.000017364353,0.000011527446,0.000013342557,0.0042690733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981825,0.00018552683,0.00030576822,0.00032232932,0.00053233,0.00047154722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988131,0.00043857296,0.00014072414,0.0001928488,0.00015102798,0.00026373882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006686587,0.00016181786,0.00034233747,0.000051850624,0.0011877546,0.00011374299,0.00026950234,0.000168812,0.00006648051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005331209,0.00013482149,0.00008603936,0.00047150286,0.0007237278,0.0003443021,0.00016584138,0.00021897873,0.0002087985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004700017,0.00006619042,0.23864295,0.0002067754,0.0003215031,0.00006397614,0.06044315,0.000034570734,0.002086061,0.58424103,0.111604504,0.002242315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006134334,0.000061769555,0.12262926,0.00016223159,0.000059689715,3.640207e-7,0.0018857315,0.000017864762,0.00060701,0.007048843,0.8665333,0.00038054815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12056293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03628284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75492877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010314133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031698233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9813025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991709971","doi":"","title":"If I should fall behind. An examination of constitutional guarantees of socio-economic rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OAR@UM (University of Malta)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disenchantment; Legislature; Politics; Core (optical fiber); Social rights; Human rights; Welfare rights; Property rights","score_opus":0.029095073187821292,"score_gpt":0.2618446361205449,"score_spread":0.23274956293272364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991709971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9643966,0.000028378103,0.0003150087,0.00072389725,0.00012323032,0.0001390598,0.00003409268,0.000023171866,0.03421656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99784184,0.000037609356,0.0010127164,0.000010006142,0.00006873665,1.938729e-7,0.000011657906,0.0000021563037,0.0010151099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903715,0.00018948325,0.00014043409,0.00017342207,0.00030041757,0.0001591057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924666,0.00013510732,0.00026069794,0.000102212456,0.00019367358,0.00006164762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005411466,0.000087388245,0.00025985882,0.00006164032,0.0005730068,0.0000070889714,0.00030523457,0.00012427021,0.00032228034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004981909,0.000093906376,0.000106080035,0.0000605575,0.002406384,0.00042001973,0.00006936724,0.0000775734,0.00001853706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008537176,0.00030967232,0.026784498,0.00009797971,0.00020257068,0.000002936791,0.11392493,0.0002656942,0.0022226472,0.84468323,0.0013079598,0.010112521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024617775,0.00045420908,0.786376,0.00013398053,0.000240207,0.0000010282536,0.119514145,0.0013186128,0.0008191447,0.005368,0.08268519,0.0006277142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018105313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012910257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83931524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001501335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007744366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9884332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991810526","doi":"","title":"An Indefensible Amendment to Medical Assistance in Dying Legislation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Government (linguistics); Amendment; Government regulation","score_opus":0.04006655517252452,"score_gpt":0.3249893987320307,"score_spread":0.2849228435595062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991810526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8983315,0.00030211225,0.0002769745,0.059142355,0.0003576876,0.00060032384,0.0000054657066,0.00022057712,0.040762953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99131036,0.000037521466,0.0011420567,0.0066639422,0.0005259479,0.000042394022,0.0000045325583,0.00001038977,0.00026285875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977438,0.0002554423,0.00027574276,0.00036585802,0.00094302534,0.00041614549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887276,0.00008454921,0.00006478351,0.00012256808,0.00008069456,0.000774645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006527495,0.00012993618,0.00021954346,0.000022015525,0.0005377254,0.00017365241,0.00032596273,0.00013056083,0.00068640563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010208825,0.00011952252,0.00004369565,0.00045474968,0.0001537138,0.0004762782,0.00008255086,0.00030272602,0.00027940312],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026884826,0.00051486713,0.27051935,0.00009215751,0.00012387139,0.00019756389,0.3009453,0.0016133451,0.008255788,0.37670225,0.023337461,0.017429218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015591014,0.00025320362,0.055726096,0.00020866185,0.000022961374,6.351077e-7,0.029681854,0.0007821477,0.0006918681,0.0013077131,0.90884763,0.0009181253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019797646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.074021526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88551015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003677764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013270686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9867296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991910898","doi":"","title":"International Human Rights and Canadian Law. Legal Commitment, Implementation and the Charter","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Charter; International human rights law; Legislation; International law","score_opus":0.05877469552339337,"score_gpt":0.34843835995346195,"score_spread":0.2896636644300686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991910898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013629566,0.0001711001,0.000001982053,0.0012819336,0.0006375939,0.0008068524,0.00004146388,0.00004533692,0.9833842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33469903,0.0002435981,0.000015767015,0.000113869406,0.0011340096,0.000001679701,0.00009643911,0.000016177088,0.6636794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99672073,0.0011729107,0.00022292043,0.00045605536,0.00088202796,0.00054535735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998494,0.00020027546,0.0001332102,0.00022641284,0.00048390782,0.00046214275],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020680532,0.00022009083,0.00023314006,0.00025458107,0.009667388,0.00052401004,0.0006936208,0.00015382188,0.00005357335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041723648,0.00018194222,0.00008668226,0.000112305446,0.0058881454,0.0005797442,0.0004369132,0.00085359835,0.00003685667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048255366,0.0000139942085,0.00017352779,0.000018466051,0.00025515276,0.0011579561,0.015828539,3.094057e-7,0.00001613851,0.9262538,0.05542884,0.00080505194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009490813,0.000029822362,0.0013967705,0.000051204042,0.000048310732,0.000012213249,0.004384967,8.7906307e-7,0.0000067252945,0.00025074583,0.9926644,0.00020490325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6925402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7541226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93723553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002462005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041357783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99681723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992732555","doi":"","title":"Measuring Judicial Activism on the Supreme Court of Canada: A Comment on Newfoundland (Treasury Board) v. Newfoundland Association of Public Employees","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial activism; Charter; Supreme court; Legislation; Judicial review; Legislature; Judicial independence; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.04258538527582147,"score_gpt":0.23429999410074406,"score_spread":0.19171460882492258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6992732555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9378138,0.00010741949,0.000013252665,0.0077568083,0.00035710895,0.00047728908,0.00006148095,0.000037246893,0.05337557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987009,0.00004408386,0.00007603009,0.00023081979,0.00009038312,0.0000022829156,0.000005081832,0.000016090777,0.00083429186],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99503356,0.0017281194,0.00038493582,0.00034523755,0.0019677111,0.0005404196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99665266,0.0011385927,0.0008266692,0.00033158943,0.00081230263,0.00023818236],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00244396,0.0002517975,0.0005507605,0.00006982159,0.0022348387,0.00008038791,0.00055074063,0.00024211063,0.000067769244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012330693,0.00023002259,0.00024509415,0.00036563294,0.00054207124,0.00039916634,0.0000845118,0.00049045176,0.0000058468736],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002898905,0.0006392321,0.9199203,0.00008725513,0.0009910516,0.00002326926,0.0073067597,0.00007181535,0.0013998479,0.062991165,0.0059898146,0.00028957773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027140595,0.0004676078,0.6524051,0.0004956155,0.00049261533,0.0000032656665,0.0129298605,0.000010063851,0.003290162,0.0015212686,0.32480055,0.00086985546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6759521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8757165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31881073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028632795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008397569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995553836","doi":"","title":"Panel II: Droits humains/Human Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Racism; Politics; Indigenous; Civil rights; Race (biology); Metropolitan area","score_opus":0.06088509421868672,"score_gpt":0.2911112470644359,"score_spread":0.2302261528457492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995553836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9556325,0.00006331373,0.0000020045677,0.0027018562,0.00028673615,0.00037453097,0.000040356754,0.00044771898,0.040450957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9415953,0.000037955386,0.00014973586,0.000050997147,0.00019664963,0.0000010433045,0.000037450478,0.000017927465,0.05791292],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690706,0.00040661913,0.00023008765,0.0005564809,0.0010672172,0.00083256717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985717,0.00017794923,0.00022549869,0.00036314505,0.00030635728,0.00035535736],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012263567,0.00026413245,0.0004404802,0.0002530588,0.01062112,0.00006372759,0.0010523865,0.00036014986,0.0013173774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018779095,0.00029443073,0.0003208617,0.0012429691,0.0011237989,0.001011318,0.00074189156,0.0004721787,0.001107947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033404547,0.00074605824,0.3474393,0.00022385483,0.0010909681,0.00056564016,0.4294946,0.00006100553,0.02860273,0.14665383,0.04178923,0.0029987525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016572357,0.00015353925,0.68113893,0.00011328734,0.00013257818,0.0000019400154,0.025448328,0.000009998302,0.00058420934,0.007847853,0.28214696,0.0007651315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072424235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02026485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40404627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004634255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006574278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995868210","doi":"","title":"The Prairie Province Epidemic: A Cry for the Meaningful Inclusion of the Indigenous Perspective into the Sentencing of Indigenous People and Gladue","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"University Library (University of Saskatchewan)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Criminal justice; Population; Inclusion (mineral); Sanctions; Economic Justice; Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.007924655172222827,"score_gpt":0.22358173037957987,"score_spread":0.21565707520735705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995868210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835915,0.002312589,0.000025820747,0.009713007,0.00028225675,0.0022563518,0.00015880856,0.000041947053,0.0016177426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813318,0.0015248872,0.00023244228,0.000043851374,0.00005359451,0.0000010573536,0.00003709947,0.00001748345,0.01675773],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781024,0.0006192233,0.00020400899,0.00034715474,0.0006859014,0.000333457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964379,0.0017967154,0.0010086616,0.0003479143,0.00034372363,0.000065060936],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070208695,0.00023313954,0.00043073462,0.000084117746,0.013511041,0.000029871613,0.0020185127,0.00021638408,0.00004362014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020755328,0.00015097157,0.000361308,0.00069281005,0.0014586428,0.00061954017,0.0018794726,0.0005447678,4.2027273e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036299534,0.000048854698,0.0071176407,0.00013965547,0.00031692014,0.0000031293991,0.98851496,0.000026331114,0.000057615627,0.001223526,0.0003156496,0.0018727013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002855693,0.00009383546,0.01723798,0.00008141947,0.00031356042,5.415228e-7,0.9668034,0.000027873584,0.000086087704,0.0011055603,0.013796841,0.00016738182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24639145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5373899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29099846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005121198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017431158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98777324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995996080","doi":"","title":"Professors Philip Girard (Osgoode), Jim Phillips (U of T) &amp; R. Blake Brown (SMU) receive Canadian Law and Society Association’s W. Wesley Pue Book Prize Honourable Mention for A History of Law in Canada, Volume One","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal history; Power (physics); Settlement (finance); Comparative law; Criminal law; Politics; Civil law (Civil law); Political history","score_opus":0.03220626347585392,"score_gpt":0.25131355385406073,"score_spread":0.2191072903782068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995996080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47221103,0.0027021915,0.000010694344,0.027537372,0.0016729176,0.0056203175,0.0005315581,0.00007493641,0.48963898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88217884,0.00022446545,0.00048125026,0.0011613903,0.00006489956,0.0000854061,0.000032288655,0.00001550852,0.11575595],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978002,0.00019653601,0.00048188338,0.00033962738,0.0005910195,0.0005907865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851465,0.00026355474,0.00042331763,0.00015770827,0.00044579618,0.00019495093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011111833,0.0001773742,0.0005084944,0.000035172943,0.00035740781,0.000020446469,0.0002070494,0.00021351402,0.0008082909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022620533,0.00017537658,0.00013669657,0.00014368207,0.00028787495,0.00042713128,0.000044479006,0.00019109603,0.000011736313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009849021,0.0002998245,0.21187794,0.0007843988,0.0010232496,8.8670754e-7,0.1979783,0.00007947884,0.003031843,0.14255603,0.44197676,0.00029282342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013208583,0.00005251661,0.038580287,0.000118200645,0.00008651451,1.03814955e-7,0.012936485,0.000066976085,0.00021843646,0.0007523436,0.94545865,0.00040864627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9993133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99993014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50348186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0137038315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026173342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9900824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996009423","doi":"","title":"The Principles of Fundamental Justice and the â Societal Consensusâ Requirement","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Norm (philosophy); Supreme court; Economic Justice; Competence (human resources); State (computer science)","score_opus":0.038824583403837355,"score_gpt":0.314959789569247,"score_spread":0.2761352061654096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996009423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54388547,0.008022196,0.0000034898383,0.010986671,0.00072609686,0.000849149,0.00003963723,0.000031720523,0.43545556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89554834,0.010235792,0.000106873296,0.000009470108,0.00007584475,8.184524e-7,0.000007458891,0.0000056436893,0.09400973],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883115,0.00022006629,0.0001144279,0.00016665018,0.00046123425,0.00020645001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865264,0.0005163229,0.0004342222,0.00013235296,0.00021325366,0.000051187384],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057257904,0.00012764176,0.00026879643,0.0000055006612,0.002214997,0.000022895883,0.0003469664,0.00012932306,0.00080150826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016347124,0.00007770466,0.00016011692,0.000027232898,0.0021013161,0.00015163767,0.00010939037,0.00008918661,0.0000038304775],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090431137,0.000051567888,0.00052172906,0.0002972384,0.0007959743,0.0000026040782,0.8591987,4.6730682e-7,0.00064848416,0.11551921,0.002603102,0.019456638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008787862,0.000033725522,0.07932241,0.00009762083,0.00046070432,1.3483417e-7,0.89539266,0.0000049366063,0.000021618749,0.000049658705,0.023607302,0.00013041696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24265788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46413353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3516629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038666136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012189809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996078153","doi":"","title":"Reading Hutterian Brethren v Alberta in a Larger Constitutional Law Context","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Legislation; Government (linguistics); Constitution; Action (physics); Reading (process)","score_opus":0.020354639343733296,"score_gpt":0.2849770873174541,"score_spread":0.2646224479737208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996078153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26775935,0.00029772607,0.0000652765,0.01688706,0.00116164,0.00062859186,0.000024833644,0.00013249982,0.71304303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99062806,0.000022079486,0.00031410082,0.003886927,0.00060822774,0.00005054848,0.00001083912,0.000010204099,0.0044689896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791795,0.00037464427,0.00032034813,0.00037261256,0.0004321027,0.00058232184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998921,0.0004386744,0.000099522484,0.00018337603,0.000112085945,0.00024534596],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008543754,0.00019171857,0.00032507093,0.00002670447,0.001194813,0.00020832088,0.0003180376,0.00017925676,0.0010754435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082245766,0.00016867247,0.00010342562,0.00019744533,0.0018634022,0.00040096694,0.000102374004,0.00030262058,0.0008893371],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001233613,0.000033254535,0.012234526,0.000007659411,0.000023530514,0.0000040106333,0.004478686,0.0000046169125,0.00026291827,0.98042816,0.0021823375,0.0003279543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007554594,0.000020842732,0.0056991396,0.00009284337,0.000013712038,0.0000016246655,0.002349634,0.000015658134,0.00014264273,0.0052565834,0.9853262,0.00032568307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21656129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38019118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98314387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031086284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000078972145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996084860","doi":"","title":"Putting the Train of Environmental Protection on Track: Nova Scotia's Experiment in Using Legislation to Strengthen Environmental Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Nova scotia; Prosperity; Environmental law; Corporate governance; Environmental governance; Environmental policy","score_opus":0.059620474262709916,"score_gpt":0.2984791490399823,"score_spread":0.23885867477727238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996084860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926318,0.00015099069,0.000025316498,0.0010531349,0.00022533759,0.0010408469,0.000017904167,0.000026912421,0.004827775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986272,0.0000052182563,0.00074631075,0.00017904476,0.0002342379,0.000031456166,0.000004303729,0.0000140315615,0.00015823862],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980827,0.00033045406,0.00031192016,0.00028749526,0.0006609703,0.00032645944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949425,0.00005951763,0.00013957031,0.00015198294,0.000008955521,0.00014570625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078686926,0.0001649076,0.00018564292,0.000028068967,0.0004461022,0.000066535315,0.00019368401,0.00009381566,0.00018139427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008320165,0.00012930528,0.000069595735,0.000118898875,0.00036834937,0.0003400909,0.00007429654,0.00021144003,0.000083047176],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043539025,0.0028048577,0.023926951,0.000038638434,0.00024406463,0.000021496458,0.5382397,0.02369996,0.2810774,0.058247846,0.00035672484,0.070906915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008965525,0.002047255,0.12233674,0.00075112376,0.00017826511,0.000009957229,0.58551776,0.0043069236,0.12262343,0.002636217,0.14789006,0.0027367463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035559006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018098498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15845399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001051236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025237909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996101417","doi":"","title":"Protecting Rights and Freedoms: Essays on the Charter's Place in Canada's Political, Legal, and Intellectual life","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Human rights; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.0289928357020444,"score_gpt":0.24269668936006955,"score_spread":0.21370385365802516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996101417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.835404,0.000003295624,0.0000025324048,0.008816693,0.000104127015,0.00078609335,0.000014606914,0.00010652013,0.15476213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99577206,0.0038037433,0.0000147468145,0.00020294277,0.00009689652,0.00000774688,0.0000013986364,0.000008627223,0.00009184518],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982081,0.00043517115,0.00012208008,0.00033106425,0.0003205192,0.0005830661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983504,0.0012535554,0.000054231103,0.00011494197,0.00007061367,0.00015625653],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039688472,0.00017056346,0.00020197092,0.0010801004,0.0014767267,0.00010266469,0.00024189425,0.00007799822,0.000020919559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013481063,0.00012733912,0.00003169568,0.0034281595,0.0004457773,0.0002233107,0.00020880469,0.00038083195,0.00000852191],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040139852,0.00019945043,0.0075322706,0.00017238792,0.0003984446,0.00074294955,0.650665,0.000042663825,0.00001884981,0.31902182,0.013696707,0.0071080537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004318264,0.000059890688,0.00087488117,0.000066131695,0.00001843787,0.000001193275,0.10336288,0.0002907311,0.00003256819,0.000012133333,0.8946166,0.0002327341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99666476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8809199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008433451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009093213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996569490","doi":"","title":"A second lecture on agnosticism by the Lord Bishop of Ontario, delivered in Chirst Church, Ottawa.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agnosticism; Order (exchange); Courage; False accusation; Precept; Race (biology)","score_opus":0.007341863030220408,"score_gpt":0.19828060156906155,"score_spread":0.19093873853884114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996569490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7751429,0.000031490737,0.00002530083,0.09187412,0.0001523395,0.00044678093,0.000037139267,0.00009707057,0.13219287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9003113,0.00008036196,0.00019064524,0.00055009127,0.00006467891,0.0000011983994,0.000014346332,0.000012453582,0.09877493],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831325,0.00039400667,0.00014922449,0.00033285853,0.00038819696,0.00042244917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988743,0.00054955937,0.0001553276,0.00022906774,0.000052435844,0.00013931282],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014226571,0.00021120573,0.00030718153,0.00008869897,0.0006840417,0.00005960922,0.0006465001,0.00019428713,0.0013910028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019113994,0.00016689817,0.00013007988,0.000514731,0.00052308483,0.0006380503,0.00020576302,0.00043289806,0.00003161013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017214776,0.0002234094,0.074677825,0.000034356664,0.00012519087,0.000027365459,0.08611387,0.00013375473,0.00004013596,0.01785076,0.8195916,0.0010095718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061978877,0.000119232725,0.09141917,0.000049754923,0.000026420885,4.891175e-8,0.0057439194,0.0000029068601,0.00050717226,0.00026802294,0.90099055,0.00025302105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46218443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2806872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18149722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004552504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021306268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996724077","doi":"","title":"The “stiff-necked parson” and the “stiff-necked” state: religious freedom and the protection of State power and authority","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Legitimacy; Appeal; Interpretation (philosophy); Power (physics); State (computer science); Reading (process); Balance (ability)","score_opus":0.028179083143507727,"score_gpt":0.28931003250381593,"score_spread":0.26113094936030823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996724077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7116301,0.11988716,0.000014564433,0.09458199,0.0017313615,0.0117166545,0.05093719,0.00075416843,0.008746792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99566793,0.0023296583,0.000019959092,0.0000625101,0.00014041962,0.00036120162,0.00010852164,0.000014701563,0.0012950747],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998235,0.00049620256,0.00024961436,0.00029556025,0.00041042993,0.00031321665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979866,0.0014593538,0.00013274488,0.00016481757,0.00017708102,0.00007938125],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091111567,0.00017746864,0.00024318259,0.000016991515,0.0018530025,0.00054155075,0.00021690087,0.00008483286,0.00039440964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003165234,0.00007628466,0.00007423339,0.00023693405,0.0010081967,0.00018676044,0.00025469807,0.00034898397,0.0000262854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009867211,0.00005095025,0.0004364862,0.0007657692,0.000957128,0.000030320025,0.4979325,0.000019553281,0.000095439624,0.01148198,0.4312426,0.056000575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033058843,0.00015752383,0.032502595,0.0014896757,0.0001834319,0.000014458958,0.025129974,0.0029161433,0.000113922535,0.023976104,0.9095955,0.00061478687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057133855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002744633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47835293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057206722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006050869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997148343","doi":"","title":"Unappealing: An Assessment of the Limits on Appeal Rights in Canada's New Refugee Determination System","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Appeal; Human rights; Asylum seeker; Refugee law","score_opus":0.025547825335198643,"score_gpt":0.31529533452203473,"score_spread":0.2897475091868361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997148343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97099835,0.00004568504,0.000014899314,0.0037938703,0.0006427561,0.000491636,0.00001438919,0.000043845423,0.023954602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818814,0.000007645517,0.00017984374,0.00013025195,0.0002588869,0.000018842733,0.0000012022288,0.0000069378507,0.0012082239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978381,0.0004571226,0.0003226227,0.0002666751,0.0007664313,0.00034908854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990628,0.00017705852,0.00020571113,0.00025301368,0.00010608746,0.00019537563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049972377,0.0001409517,0.00022685346,0.000021583726,0.00058222405,0.00004161538,0.00043083192,0.00008536558,0.00003319024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013877047,0.00007560951,0.000058060086,0.00019966318,0.00013850178,0.00023677597,0.000050327155,0.00014973458,0.000011079341],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003799026,0.0001147265,0.08711567,0.00007404982,0.000053709668,0.000018629546,0.0038959435,0.00008483205,0.0013992995,0.893181,0.0016323989,0.012391719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021327753,0.0001877756,0.76322556,0.0015052042,0.000054960477,0.0000016595417,0.006050485,0.00017342063,0.0039000488,0.0020762535,0.21996327,0.00072859315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96246904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89110476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030050222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080495013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78580284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999148761","doi":"","title":"The codification of rights in the Australian and New Zealand Charters: the Canadian lessons","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Human rights; Work (physics); Legislature","score_opus":0.15080536810146447,"score_gpt":0.33499104937160795,"score_spread":0.18418568127014348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999148761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039321585,0.00027841702,0.000039386163,0.062448345,0.00030344643,0.0025408913,0.00015267084,0.000018945697,0.93028575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95000935,0.0005540863,0.000027250884,0.00003437088,0.000102952516,0.0000025732736,0.000027503309,0.0000033588642,0.049238537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979017,0.00031138668,0.00028063238,0.000122591,0.0010573522,0.0003263514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983681,0.0002655933,0.00030321727,0.0002774698,0.000627578,0.00015808188],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030100343,0.00012244664,0.00021839637,0.00021301165,0.004220044,0.00015966529,0.000764871,0.00023968169,0.000027788674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001707715,0.000075564145,0.000070496935,0.0002258917,0.00190893,0.00049193215,0.00006524459,0.0004517994,0.00004238405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034338933,0.0000031887196,0.000093224175,0.000078150035,0.00006994689,0.000003954255,0.14400172,0.0000107643855,0.0000018410998,0.7995609,0.052959688,0.0031822557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024870966,0.000023071745,0.002341732,0.00012280853,0.000018732215,0.0000017083422,0.063249506,0.0000114511095,9.960389e-7,0.0003746652,0.9335269,0.0000797149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67842263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8035611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9460772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083142886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093385024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99707633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999408820","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Change and Constitutional Amendment: A Canadian Conundrum","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Government (linguistics); Constitutional law; Legislation; Legislature","score_opus":0.04087634617059131,"score_gpt":0.27955000907245603,"score_spread":0.2386736629018647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999408820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26203972,0.0042681983,0.00008207198,0.067133114,0.0021716568,0.0030613265,0.00040810526,0.00032336824,0.66051245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993337,0.00015949638,0.00031501686,0.0038564063,0.00058588054,0.00022673035,0.000022558794,0.0000036504464,0.0014933028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984437,0.000105628234,0.00018818714,0.00028583678,0.00039292919,0.00058370887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987736,0.00009844622,0.00005937792,0.00009638056,0.00021071748,0.00076153077],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024482916,0.00016293852,0.00019195199,0.000030152516,0.0022799396,0.0002685284,0.00016846503,0.00013065481,0.0035507048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021170596,0.00014682653,0.000055015986,0.00013751126,0.010848041,0.0007074245,0.000060138438,0.00019909129,0.001238221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016391219,0.000013712598,0.013791059,0.000005576153,0.000032294236,0.0000068252702,0.0014422563,6.397947e-7,0.000031208227,0.97911155,0.005193025,0.00037022916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004530378,0.00001775009,0.013808735,0.00003644372,0.000017985021,0.000006434691,0.0025198297,0.000006685483,0.000017021528,0.0038693,0.9789505,0.00029625554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70573163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5477513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97524226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005375629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038778037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999440925","doi":"","title":"Comparative analysis of constitutional law mechanism for human rights protection in Canada and Russia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Ratification; Right to property; Constitution; Convention; Linguistic rights","score_opus":0.03403400914910921,"score_gpt":0.3006650207599732,"score_spread":0.266631011610864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999440925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9568521,0.00006936092,6.0503544e-7,0.000026595195,0.0003725317,0.0015471053,0.0012108672,0.00003580063,0.039885066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982334,0.000017107383,0.00020610525,0.000034691875,0.000024193114,0.00032549552,0.00048967375,0.000011375287,0.00065797666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972662,0.0002827262,0.00066770375,0.00058812747,0.00076620723,0.00042907055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834627,0.00017479577,0.00056928484,0.0001374802,0.0006118194,0.00016032877],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049110234,0.00037124095,0.000956114,0.00024105165,0.0035530354,0.000045109282,0.00024087008,0.00036826293,0.00006377428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016396052,0.0003482141,0.00022361899,0.00077293295,0.000428936,0.00037201136,0.000032557185,0.0005048345,0.0000020110617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005084655,0.000053029573,0.000040037463,0.00008195776,0.00074722286,0.000004030759,0.00030417368,0.000081624166,0.0019916035,0.99642867,4.4972094e-7,0.00021634833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049885246,0.00037971756,0.034662455,0.0013829033,0.0056359377,0.000002934617,0.027620604,0.00010875859,0.08054263,0.8012845,0.03969093,0.0037001255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9851606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99965626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19514419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039606337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034182466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999461094","doi":"","title":"Conscience and rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Charter; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Face (sociological concept); Buckingham; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.02582811944723843,"score_gpt":0.331058402861469,"score_spread":0.30523028341423053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999461094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000020403451,0.005019765,0.0000020686816,0.0018290918,0.000572311,0.00017108122,0.000006349151,0.0003288736,0.99205005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020453255,0.00056861085,0.00036021674,0.00009401865,0.00038236042,0.0000073919346,4.2930026e-7,0.000036679678,0.99650496],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992507,0.000032995926,0.000057856614,0.00023809086,0.00023780133,0.00018254085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997931,0.00003142242,0.000027524033,0.000057464626,0.0000146983475,0.00007578915],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012676303,0.00010225848,0.00013583801,0.000033576292,0.00023596096,0.00011325657,0.000117156866,0.00013879541,0.004693232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044299006,0.00006294504,0.00002918056,0.00010826952,0.0009186562,0.000031118572,0.00006764261,0.0000890941,0.0015078429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.610013e-8,0.0000020095217,0.000017343427,0.000012022273,0.0000151004815,0.0000031222553,0.0031933053,1.1822107e-9,8.4304224e-7,0.089816645,0.90664464,0.00029486895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021206673,0.000002949347,0.000019841274,0.000052192125,0.000013279222,1.9402191e-7,0.0011754597,3.2113618e-7,0.0000012096384,0.002245392,0.9963538,0.00011415543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051410675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05806044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089709155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039772644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022607805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999538060","doi":"","title":"Contact and Christianisation: Reassessing Purported English Loanwords in Old Norse&#13;\\n","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Circumstantial evidence; Headline; Subject (documents); Nasalization; Context (archaeology); Pretext","score_opus":0.02593023147573858,"score_gpt":0.25902231669104264,"score_spread":0.23309208521530406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999538060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9604283,0.0006480744,0.0000693303,0.0023063535,0.00036120112,0.0006835579,0.0002724368,0.00007602687,0.035154704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9690694,0.004907261,0.0008339633,0.000012689326,0.000090848014,1.779343e-8,0.00025309928,0.000016954256,0.024815716],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976127,0.00041642072,0.00025721933,0.0005613628,0.0007294336,0.0004228667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99654543,0.0004829659,0.0013651776,0.00051526405,0.0009038751,0.00018731193],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006958049,0.000374731,0.0010105781,0.0003509044,0.0023407477,0.000038485432,0.0016547622,0.0008221668,0.0006142653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030617887,0.00046238975,0.0003961469,0.00044652022,0.0020211125,0.0007484314,0.00032465457,0.0008541073,0.0000041412095],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002218291,0.0007705795,0.043782018,0.00088095927,0.0011066764,0.00022426342,0.9238608,0.00019382319,0.00039723204,0.0024098973,0.0032543698,0.02090111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017502608,0.00013437938,0.20755255,0.0009526903,0.00059204723,8.8979004e-7,0.7574001,0.000111164576,0.0000151112035,0.00008011559,0.030933093,0.0004776198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20590061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45573506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24983446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034360398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048842415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999910506","doi":"","title":"The Domestic Implementation of International Law: A Canadian Case Study","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Charter; Right to property; Reservation of rights; Linguistic rights; International law","score_opus":0.025044373108454115,"score_gpt":0.3499661517367276,"score_spread":0.32492177862827354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999910506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.940735,0.00022297463,0.0000020284274,0.0019237032,0.00067140063,0.00064037595,0.000021012285,0.000025682724,0.055757836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984751,0.00003271377,0.00009224002,0.00022875075,0.0001142472,0.000057069574,0.0000022228617,0.0000060048405,0.0009916875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986254,0.00029767526,0.00023164054,0.00015531457,0.00038473945,0.00030523533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920094,0.0001867394,0.000091424175,0.00012302432,0.00019999815,0.00019787907],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076546066,0.000090870344,0.000109963476,0.000019383331,0.0018410705,0.00014674061,0.00021797043,0.000037291542,0.0004653054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030546033,0.000065848544,0.00005085319,0.00014999187,0.00028537732,0.00020651618,0.000027574684,0.00011400348,0.00004644756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005799211,0.0000879231,0.10779855,0.000004571065,0.00020665096,0.00031719825,0.047567867,0.00001129411,0.000024822448,0.8407461,0.0017318524,0.0014974003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009600962,0.000088506495,0.019114159,0.000009139542,0.000055759207,0.00003492366,0.46899045,0.0000025812142,0.00006435353,0.002108143,0.50834084,0.00023106094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83863795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004156915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022553923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999963545","doi":"","title":"Disability and Performance Standards under the Ontario Human Rights Code","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Code (set theory); Legislation; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.032765262315578476,"score_gpt":0.29658363127635945,"score_spread":0.263818368960781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999963545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9222401,0.00031928037,0.0000015705319,0.0035756025,0.00017748837,0.0003013069,0.00001673863,0.00007954287,0.07328839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98823303,0.00004712748,0.00006245992,0.00028417638,0.00026674804,0.000025576963,0.0000016031809,0.0000066660855,0.011072614],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982479,0.00018680173,0.00020294738,0.0002906871,0.00066938164,0.00040226677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992851,0.00011754907,0.000065690176,0.00023673757,0.00012268416,0.00017220942],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006939287,0.00015934404,0.00019610378,0.0000052609626,0.0049495795,0.00022277702,0.0002812798,0.00009482175,0.0023992849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004886441,0.000096797754,0.000067577705,0.00010790569,0.0019103059,0.00040298176,0.000103254206,0.00034129925,0.00008217077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039545484,0.00031459064,0.5801319,0.000048624697,0.00017729583,0.000004900793,0.0828866,0.000029204472,0.0000512982,0.31462285,0.020224573,0.0014686002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030634642,0.000048896483,0.3496059,0.0000193941,0.00002379806,5.7068297e-7,0.0015967914,0.000010693553,0.000035572844,0.0023236615,0.6458219,0.00020646631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3531594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9352383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62559736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009798338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024988522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000347197","doi":"","title":"Everyday Legal Problems and the Cost of Justice in Canada: Infographic","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Infographic; Economic Justice; Everyday life; Commission; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.018370470269097324,"score_gpt":0.2534970870235546,"score_spread":0.23512661675445728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000347197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9429371,0.0021940158,0.000011746408,0.020870548,0.00058786414,0.0011320687,0.000031758016,0.000037777696,0.03219713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99746376,0.0006894087,0.000038037095,0.00044762788,0.00011832269,0.000059275644,4.79317e-7,0.000005892636,0.0011771754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984702,0.00027144502,0.0002749916,0.00018199037,0.000443856,0.0003575476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988852,0.00060856534,0.00011987274,0.0001367566,0.00012165237,0.00012794927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007572273,0.00011752829,0.00024730043,0.000020288897,0.00047695398,0.00004667349,0.00026568712,0.000059086844,0.000083095605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007519087,0.000060540468,0.00004624624,0.00028543253,0.0010735592,0.00032143827,0.00008905806,0.0001543049,0.0000093807275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016750624,0.00006475927,0.2425881,0.00015113788,0.00016338979,0.000016587232,0.017531179,0.000048057194,0.00045222096,0.7226336,0.0091251,0.007058365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040522693,0.00003648813,0.27156532,0.00030786375,0.00011112404,0.0000019141844,0.013977728,0.000014338475,0.00014525768,0.0024086297,0.7069206,0.0004584342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9884162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.720225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034416057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003785057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39555734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000515459","doi":"","title":"Freedom of Conscience: A Communal-based Approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Dialogical self; Charter; Subjectivity; Freedom of religion; Freedom of thought","score_opus":0.03872762851920357,"score_gpt":0.31996113622723343,"score_spread":0.28123350770802985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000515459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13783434,0.003733663,0.0013103659,0.04624764,0.0034668664,0.0022684368,0.000059842805,0.0014327465,0.8036461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99397767,0.00023913624,0.0032741171,0.00048694,0.0003833831,0.000093659655,0.000056678833,0.000028967517,0.0014594442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996865,0.0003310832,0.00050388864,0.0005545134,0.0011482063,0.00059735065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832207,0.0007271998,0.00015041037,0.00034694912,0.000243474,0.00020991788],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012386127,0.0002976022,0.0004015483,0.00018415571,0.0016171978,0.00036518095,0.00070825015,0.00017243004,0.0010674373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006655648,0.00025384524,0.0002552559,0.0012779954,0.003032809,0.00072360464,0.000090058624,0.00035666698,0.00025106737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001283202,0.0007651358,0.008054935,0.0006435256,0.0008489591,0.000024985402,0.12391022,0.0017981555,0.012180183,0.77123755,0.007020673,0.07338733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00166407,0.00021724755,0.008771209,0.00040473003,0.00038087365,0.0000075866506,0.044950794,0.006376538,0.00063410436,0.0043273703,0.930686,0.0015794507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040699895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009890192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92366534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049514935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055286003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001370008","doi":"","title":"The Interpretation of Assisted Death Under Section Seven of the Canadian Charter","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Arca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Legislation; Assisted suicide","score_opus":0.008124874181169915,"score_gpt":0.2302667651020258,"score_spread":0.22214189092085587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001370008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14253063,0.009172468,7.1099896e-7,0.0024848012,0.005869912,0.0033585897,0.000092814436,0.00014088993,0.8363492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91117483,0.0014940316,0.0000073948177,0.00017089517,0.00048800634,0.00008548787,0.00025951603,0.000041666863,0.086278185],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974333,0.00033048276,0.0004926441,0.00033477537,0.0005680491,0.0008407204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985812,0.0002856217,0.00057630206,0.00026892667,0.00018859192,0.00009937957],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039279668,0.00017247933,0.00038221542,0.000023968683,0.0020320006,0.0005910321,0.0007046447,0.00041369145,0.004146188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008338728,0.00018643518,0.0002924274,0.00057769835,0.00024480035,0.000473506,0.00005549081,0.0006834973,0.000004948853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032950705,0.00027720173,0.059582654,0.00055662205,0.003221513,0.000007810744,0.040171556,0.000759997,0.000015994357,0.2569211,0.41690925,0.22124676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012584566,0.00048169846,0.45586392,0.0027624087,0.00065912504,0.000012821978,0.017338641,0.0007816806,0.000041196272,0.23173688,0.28754583,0.0015173173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7186598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99749017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7686442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064143643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002349418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001820528","doi":"","title":"Lo, How Sparrow Has Fallen: A Retrospective of the Supreme Court of Canada's Section 35 Jurisprudence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Sparrow; Pretext","score_opus":0.01978119971431492,"score_gpt":0.2570152424796264,"score_spread":0.23723404276531151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001820528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9225584,0.0007996592,0.000017053824,0.044502154,0.0010923757,0.00065347424,0.00007825441,0.00006079557,0.030237779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939859,0.000078791665,0.0002204367,0.00022285523,0.00063354755,0.000018321658,0.0000012122802,0.000009783276,0.0048291334],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977905,0.00022246574,0.0002597351,0.00027251322,0.0010520134,0.00040273686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987981,0.000107000196,0.0002860953,0.0002616871,0.00040523589,0.00014192445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004854754,0.00016266569,0.00031175598,0.000015308948,0.0010802159,0.000079431054,0.00047717575,0.00012639177,0.00018208055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000654651,0.00011887014,0.00013395946,0.00032612451,0.0008267333,0.00031430437,0.000110156034,0.00031067786,0.000004360889],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017690509,0.0004852591,0.37585017,0.00019027657,0.000690846,0.000011668669,0.06459047,0.00089899084,0.013609195,0.15966159,0.38268661,0.0011480142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070839166,0.000098313234,0.38759565,0.00017207276,0.00007651664,0.0000018615269,0.012328514,0.000052377905,0.012426138,0.0007380607,0.58533686,0.00046522255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8033512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98458517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20265028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001043241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005424452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8308257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7005494557","doi":"","title":"A Reply to Professor Pothier's Review of Power Without Law: The\\nSupreme Court of Canada, the Marshall Decisions and the\\nFailure of Judicial Activism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Argument (complex analysis); Treaty; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Supreme Court Decisions; Precedent; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.017168061637449824,"score_gpt":0.29279790921969845,"score_spread":0.2756298475822486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7005494557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5893392,0.010229069,0.0000056336917,0.34130064,0.0010564323,0.0042257328,0.00013847061,0.00003543455,0.053669386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98997945,0.0010185672,0.00027980242,0.0071984115,0.00015256775,0.00008773576,9.511805e-7,0.00001310664,0.0012694349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974156,0.00052820606,0.0005179932,0.00024475987,0.000951599,0.00034184495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971374,0.0012059007,0.0004261358,0.0005200131,0.0005581419,0.00015238058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026270605,0.00017521268,0.00055099017,0.0000098435985,0.0010487672,0.000033330056,0.0007565262,0.0000931789,0.00020797818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036962568,0.00008286613,0.00014010552,0.00027108518,0.001824083,0.00014210535,0.00024799316,0.00050608226,0.0000041243384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003600919,0.00015234362,0.0036877238,0.0004066567,0.0004750254,0.0000037944974,0.034768958,0.0000023798573,0.0015074895,0.81372225,0.14361589,0.00129742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010494754,0.00009414312,0.027394172,0.0020933857,0.00023395084,0.0000035652706,0.010404172,0.0000026241776,0.0005746782,0.0064572375,0.95135874,0.00033386258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7308763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9141197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80774283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066251014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042042043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8066376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006522265","doi":"","title":"Unconstitutional or Just Unworkable? The Life and Death of a Prohibition on Floor-Crossing in Fletcher v the Government of Manitoba","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Repeal; Government (linguistics); Charter; Legislature; Legislative history","score_opus":0.036673547381360666,"score_gpt":0.2893710444956228,"score_spread":0.25269749711426215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006522265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97665626,0.00035511414,0.000003706549,0.0031473602,0.00016624828,0.0005840025,0.000014906155,0.000011452864,0.019060977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99860257,0.000055935016,0.00012304878,0.0003925216,0.00013468132,0.00002556608,8.472093e-7,0.0000044291287,0.0006604018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985341,0.00018452876,0.00022922967,0.00016313234,0.0006884271,0.00020062421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993689,0.0002458074,0.00013808616,0.0001281253,0.00006757949,0.000051514744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069382606,0.00010082404,0.00016969952,0.0000072443822,0.0006204333,0.00008576699,0.00016883544,0.000067229914,0.0001542943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037332327,0.00005074606,0.000047396523,0.0001517545,0.00074797164,0.00016298525,0.000076572134,0.00018354348,0.000020917592],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003774834,0.00024884308,0.32932442,0.00012855264,0.00012279085,0.000004131242,0.018472144,0.00056197366,0.0015422744,0.6466251,0.00083568675,0.0017565731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024488238,0.00023151518,0.8263218,0.00090775784,0.0000937711,0.0000023313478,0.10443802,0.000132651,0.0018798367,0.0033566526,0.05971937,0.00046748974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01306537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027577639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64326847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022917509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001488845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006792801","doi":"","title":"Value Change in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Demotion","score_opus":0.04923221760151887,"score_gpt":0.27202193993545815,"score_spread":0.2227897223339393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006792801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53165084,0.0000038989024,0.0000016415961,0.010163306,0.0002900333,0.00093824026,0.00004062188,0.000103139224,0.45680827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791067,0.020490777,0.000025876092,0.00016788156,0.00010739304,0.000005105931,0.0000051613533,0.0000060636185,0.000084989304],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984839,0.00033202796,0.000106009895,0.0001821143,0.0004952252,0.00040073122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940515,0.00024222041,0.00007157024,0.0001407443,0.000096783115,0.000043514963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047642898,0.00010631132,0.0001658156,0.00088506663,0.0004765448,0.00001869131,0.0005216495,0.00006491786,0.000022203201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018639817,0.00008446502,0.00006114332,0.00847531,0.00018365317,0.00021758901,0.00012600527,0.00014190169,0.000006549092],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000614852,0.0001481096,0.029029947,0.000085979,0.00012683005,0.0004040368,0.91968733,0.000046186928,0.000007788739,0.032056488,0.00975414,0.008591658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023222777,0.000017830498,0.015368515,0.000019355042,0.000016291158,2.125766e-7,0.048540525,0.000044838376,0.000014779189,0.0000012975346,0.9356342,0.000109917855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9977077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9258801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052718964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054720585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40721056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008334498","doi":"","title":"Care and Social Justice: Developing a Right to Basic Income in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Basic income; Basic needs; Argument (complex analysis); Welfare; Social justice; Workfare; Social policy; Distributive justice; Welfare state","score_opus":0.06945585885392196,"score_gpt":0.32254235906304235,"score_spread":0.2530865002091204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008334498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949722,0.00012926286,0.0000070991496,0.0033407675,0.00040508027,0.00038849303,0.00004643294,0.000054499575,0.0006561381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99769175,0.000024505847,0.00003908734,0.000851215,0.00010016291,0.0000060650323,0.000008373571,0.000015374837,0.0012634608],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754965,0.0005596886,0.00018893894,0.0004427521,0.00067402114,0.0005849199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933314,0.00012919583,0.00009897963,0.00011722628,0.00012884698,0.00019260278],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003217928,0.00020476549,0.0002868704,0.00020770404,0.002892647,0.00014097095,0.00061502587,0.000071735674,0.000050346298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005918354,0.00023902438,0.000048042293,0.0008012973,0.00011732273,0.00059753796,0.0008997561,0.00051644014,0.000012055648],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031688498,0.000009594026,0.96088976,0.00005410886,0.000021828173,0.0002455356,0.037803456,0.000023179822,0.000020045065,0.00045420817,0.0000035496455,0.00044307671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048114912,0.00002826025,0.8501765,0.00003517715,0.000039753213,0.0000021213757,0.10016197,4.729179e-8,0.000025235928,0.000023230185,0.048684068,0.000342465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19884163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99046105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7916194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065100933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001156129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99840546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008662409","doi":"","title":"Context, Choice, and Rights: PHS Community Services Society v Canada (Attorney General)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Service (business); Work (physics); Community service","score_opus":0.030774908328448165,"score_gpt":0.2672320304859552,"score_spread":0.236457122157507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008662409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9193025,0.0015323204,0.0000012807562,0.0010172483,0.00048462625,0.0003374184,0.000049792063,0.00013550685,0.07713926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912906,0.00018395952,0.0005476901,0.0036902393,0.00042339027,0.00003476439,0.000012774108,0.000014807476,0.0038017314],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978986,0.00049279456,0.0002770863,0.00028197668,0.00048163842,0.00056795456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986693,0.00022886484,0.00014678459,0.0003021803,0.0002207612,0.000432057],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005566516,0.00025125453,0.00033529339,0.00000921172,0.0043337313,0.00014450097,0.0005748717,0.00016500925,0.0005189538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000776626,0.00020316755,0.00010639251,0.00016772444,0.0007161616,0.00053645676,0.00023222137,0.0005568102,0.000042147036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046677244,0.00043091524,0.33417144,0.00034436988,0.0009633853,0.000022409871,0.28482616,0.000003315694,0.0004670717,0.25163168,0.12473845,0.002354124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005329932,0.000029192632,0.08871625,0.000046176792,0.00004694021,7.7030137e-7,0.02430726,0.000009744149,0.00021302594,0.0013137358,0.8843784,0.0004055134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99872106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004641173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018610679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008884250","doi":"","title":"David W. Porter, éd. - The Antwerp-London Glossaries: The latin and Latin-Old English Vocabularies from Antwerp, Museum Plantin-Moretus 16.2 - London, British Library Add. 32246.I : Texts and Indexes. Toronto, Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 2011, x-258 p. (Publications of the Dictionary of Old English, 8)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vocabulary; Medieval Latin; Latin Americans; Biography","score_opus":0.021906280966295443,"score_gpt":0.2439762052519742,"score_spread":0.22206992428567876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008884250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9460657,0.026076283,0.000054678785,0.017413674,0.00081919896,0.001051445,0.00064449216,0.00013434564,0.007740156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882059,0.0072699883,0.00070353516,0.000100639976,0.00013013113,0.000049979404,0.00015928187,0.000020260291,0.0033602973],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99512064,0.0024744528,0.00076081365,0.0004558745,0.0008579646,0.00033026346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927407,0.0029916377,0.000779784,0.0008945223,0.0024296273,0.0001637174],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031725941,0.00024368714,0.00047965522,0.0000399677,0.0013454966,0.0002930002,0.0010730259,0.00019080202,0.00009338022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007140243,0.00016516006,0.00012719508,0.000434668,0.0044548386,0.0009540848,0.0009807668,0.00035434868,7.8264065e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000803136,0.0005575872,0.3999089,0.000095317475,0.00056819286,0.000001976713,0.4874074,0.000004806638,0.00031556815,0.06370521,0.03847494,0.008879813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016537841,0.000007423034,0.7200076,0.0010063092,0.00029240802,0.0000048754423,0.050280146,0.00019260657,0.0032025382,0.002472868,0.2204006,0.0004788118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05083543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08243123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43712723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096381635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029321387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009185854","doi":"","title":"Does the Attorney General Have a Duty to Defend Her Legislature’s Statutes? A Comment on the &lt;i&gt;Reference Re Genetic Non-Discrimination Act&lt;/i&gt;","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Duty; Legislation; Legislature; Power of attorney","score_opus":0.03953545788709872,"score_gpt":0.28930123870800173,"score_spread":0.249765780820903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009185854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48936665,0.00068689266,0.00009277254,0.41820636,0.0010042444,0.0026723812,0.0001422431,0.00021603715,0.08761242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96071917,0.00023506525,0.0007328688,0.03213052,0.0011994605,0.00029649845,0.000017793169,0.000032086635,0.00463656],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637586,0.00066826085,0.00039235107,0.0006422327,0.0011480941,0.0007732089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981709,0.00043251325,0.00020545877,0.00047593314,0.0002550401,0.00046016555],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006341717,0.00038962165,0.00035090235,0.000021991276,0.002437419,0.00054746924,0.0010078241,0.00018915039,0.0006385105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007510054,0.00018468464,0.0001873229,0.00033206656,0.00053826533,0.00028586658,0.0003521876,0.0005917662,0.00045482855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022042627,0.0002640943,0.0030291758,0.00006625866,0.00033859175,0.00003018499,0.18531704,0.00040794088,0.0076688793,0.35028982,0.4489128,0.0034547923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036927403,0.00014126116,0.025213087,0.00006106174,0.0000642771,3.32091e-7,0.006474933,0.000116032534,0.00048062266,0.00067494746,0.96600574,0.00039841604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054151607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059774086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51709294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004425634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012152109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99886125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009949512","doi":"","title":"Fighting for Deinstitutionalization in Nova Scotia: Emerald Hall Human Rights Case","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Human rights; Appeal; Commission; Complaint; Institutionalisation; Tribunal","score_opus":0.051796697627297446,"score_gpt":0.32663712276162665,"score_spread":0.2748404251343292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009949512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9199069,0.0005980727,0.0008037708,0.02401885,0.0007043737,0.0019659945,0.00006190629,0.00035112328,0.05158897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958408,0.0000039337265,0.0013729206,0.0013808928,0.0008535726,0.000033491586,0.000033595505,0.000010191798,0.00047060804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851733,0.00012273838,0.00032176572,0.00034048976,0.00031249574,0.00038517357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993162,0.00010835867,0.00010606792,0.000085450905,0.0001744063,0.00020950574],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003165606,0.00015414822,0.00022041841,0.000022709464,0.0021721958,0.00013570688,0.00019117307,0.0001239696,0.00046002754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042663384,0.00013672186,0.00009487346,0.00030590073,0.0002537922,0.0005222194,0.000060241724,0.00018190265,0.00014344319],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021690741,0.00008112006,0.0066361125,0.00007288424,0.000051298513,0.00020023876,0.014879567,0.00038465337,0.0004201012,0.9674819,0.009654383,0.00011605999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023354848,0.00011802212,0.003551226,0.00016220727,0.00006637945,0.000012677775,0.00288921,0.00045046842,0.00088441547,0.008304996,0.98038274,0.0008421985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2053359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63883203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97072834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025911973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040967047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010018502","doi":"","title":"A frequency dictionary of Oold English prose for learners of Old English and historical linguists","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Lodz Repository (University of Łódź)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Old English; Corpus linguistics; Word (group theory); British National Corpus; Word lists by frequency; Parsing","score_opus":0.016859622056055103,"score_gpt":0.20465037870455605,"score_spread":0.18779075664850095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010018502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24995261,0.00418967,0.00007843573,0.000389285,0.0028970079,0.002299315,0.00066575606,0.00022834443,0.7392996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1881418,0.0015365748,0.0029262796,0.000007475823,0.00045598022,3.3808126e-7,0.00007162431,0.000029571132,0.80683035],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810845,0.00020327204,0.0002729845,0.0004486709,0.0007238537,0.00024275758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99678504,0.0003745369,0.0011009555,0.00025135445,0.001340041,0.00014806486],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036826797,0.0002262614,0.00081001833,0.00019909778,0.0011110011,0.0000057945317,0.0006473669,0.00041302442,0.00012586481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003254549,0.0003160426,0.00047176937,0.00019965293,0.0016732352,0.00025795656,0.0003989022,0.00037476094,3.2071992e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013085711,0.00081118057,0.020896247,0.002934337,0.0018874588,0.0001623552,0.8463717,0.00008234638,0.0007516739,0.03259792,0.09116143,0.0010347592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002081946,0.0008549452,0.0040874635,0.00042596724,0.0011058415,0.0000017193578,0.20619889,0.000012393657,0.000057261565,0.00051365036,0.78399867,0.0006612339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016107379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011418858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69283724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019589388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065144716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010039184","doi":"","title":"The Gildersleeve Prize for the Best Article Published in the <i>American Journal of Philology</i> in 2014 Has Been Presented to: William Josiah Edwards Davis,\\nUniversity of Toronto Faculty of Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Editorial board; Review article; Biography; Publishing","score_opus":0.05606685299926505,"score_gpt":0.30678504929770095,"score_spread":0.2507181962984359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010039184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8652539,0.00005936746,0.00022300277,0.03060653,0.00034575988,0.0029857685,0.00012929221,0.00003011003,0.10036625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99527466,0.0042147185,0.00027828946,0.00011851771,0.000070499256,0.0000037050656,0.0000020637217,0.0000065219983,0.00003103639],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977305,0.00072388886,0.00031163584,0.00019892858,0.0006461673,0.00038888975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745023,0.0008325394,0.00048165562,0.00023076306,0.0009167927,0.00008801234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020647424,0.00014801328,0.00037700092,0.0003358486,0.000565602,0.00007074213,0.0012791425,0.00007438008,0.000003754236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096793653,0.00008625732,0.00017252052,0.0021804597,0.0013897202,0.000722498,0.00026410434,0.00022776215,8.3418837e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031444086,0.0015347031,0.047479693,0.000051103954,0.000763263,0.00003035601,0.8913197,0.00041610756,0.00012588952,0.026179312,0.016705815,0.0122496635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013047493,0.00041830871,0.0055558993,0.000026325375,0.00008434567,9.0157863e-7,0.15197036,0.00003386449,0.00009998678,0.000016978072,0.84037465,0.000113644135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59222335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5886413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82366884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068497926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005217755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51204824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010743748","doi":"","title":"Is Being a Vegan a Human Right? Advocates Claim Protection Under New Ontario Policy, but That Wasn’t the Point","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Point (geometry); Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Legislation; Human rights","score_opus":0.03994686374011938,"score_gpt":0.29754112274702266,"score_spread":0.25759425900690325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010743748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7947229,0.00029873144,0.00014753283,0.14541453,0.00051828095,0.0015134831,0.0000084247595,0.00036889556,0.05700723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93794185,0.000047852816,0.00011396727,0.0020966837,0.0013022723,0.00010239226,0.0000016459478,0.000023607807,0.0583697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756163,0.00026910336,0.00028815542,0.0004661963,0.00068164215,0.00073327613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890107,0.00013148529,0.00017940828,0.00034685255,0.00012389974,0.00031731275],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055491267,0.00028158884,0.0002792792,0.00004175552,0.0037296517,0.00035988822,0.00052789366,0.00020005609,0.0015768793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018630043,0.00015073057,0.00020873574,0.00024396222,0.0006758518,0.0007454349,0.00018396802,0.00039336606,0.00060309866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008666402,0.0001795704,0.020394258,0.00003393721,0.0004913608,0.000013768349,0.14712882,0.00000656581,0.014146718,0.7869382,0.024499796,0.0060803485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001408574,0.00015381162,0.06667402,0.0002757371,0.00009419697,0.0000049863343,0.012076122,0.0000015956468,0.010049971,0.12323997,0.78521085,0.00081015617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8582211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8412023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7607111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018596147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041620154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010790138","doi":"","title":"Justice Scalia's Impact on Canadian Jurisprudence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.029357123914186725,"score_gpt":0.32716048849920154,"score_spread":0.29780336458501483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010790138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68491006,0.0008306502,0.0000027026415,0.017179895,0.0020914401,0.00073730963,0.00021631284,0.0002566263,0.29377502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986779,0.000054887474,0.00009984105,0.00331767,0.0006097733,0.00009183866,0.00001051727,0.000018374389,0.009018145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997189,0.00043156525,0.00020860462,0.0003866627,0.0009178252,0.0008663713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985059,0.00021252442,0.000086904016,0.00026158176,0.00010817517,0.00082494115],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007882425,0.00020788364,0.00023530803,0.000056694276,0.0057072993,0.00020487892,0.0006675865,0.00008429006,0.005373515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047709057,0.00017935385,0.00016467502,0.00049706106,0.0003237549,0.00027564616,0.0001501407,0.0005825748,0.000894758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015102598,0.00030197727,0.03224424,0.00005076262,0.00028777224,0.0003151886,0.03978139,0.0028318835,0.0002668964,0.49440527,0.42544168,0.0039219162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027450346,0.00013145483,0.030951027,0.000016319153,0.000055744295,0.0000023132716,0.010472008,0.000021210442,0.000032892716,0.0007794119,0.956865,0.00039808254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88738555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75078386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53142333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025411036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053015724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7011132547","doi":"","title":"Legal Representation for Complainants of Sexual Violence in the Criminal Justice System: A Proposal to Advance Women's Equality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual violence; Criminal justice; Harm; Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Representation (politics); Criminal law","score_opus":0.13925242881592523,"score_gpt":0.39761638123982734,"score_spread":0.2583639524239021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7011132547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968929,0.000027192626,0.0004390485,0.0006392211,0.000311231,0.0013343357,0.0000895641,0.000058826387,0.00020766538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988943,0.0000072740795,0.00011659745,0.00018869751,0.00008833766,0.000052913576,0.000009201934,0.000011200592,0.0006315196],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99622923,0.0015590185,0.00031206594,0.00048028317,0.0008659045,0.0005534724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998634,0.00044779133,0.00026316594,0.00028221836,0.00024252842,0.00013031135],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020046055,0.00018012535,0.00031384695,0.00015481563,0.0016987413,0.00012296879,0.0010829164,0.00006266711,0.000008296541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032009423,0.00016870294,0.00006362926,0.0008240868,0.00024347489,0.0009630816,0.0004196542,0.00036091675,0.000007831439],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012214055,0.00039599772,0.7740951,0.0009984784,0.00006340603,0.00015080122,0.2020773,0.00073325366,0.0008637571,0.018136613,0.0000032902456,0.0012605952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008450286,0.00040329207,0.45642915,0.00010619088,0.0001518704,0.000006993444,0.53961605,0.0000015636057,0.000098857185,0.00006942645,0.0020002935,0.00027128938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009851682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016127272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33753875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012623315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016853906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014602978","doi":"","title":"Populism and human rights - A case study of the Canadian Freedom Convoy","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"ELTE Digital Institutional Repository (EDIT) (Eötvös Loránd University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Populism; Democracy; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.018154914103019594,"score_gpt":0.25752006662461663,"score_spread":0.23936515252159704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014602978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73285854,0.00011964951,7.340733e-8,0.000058347297,0.0022476313,0.0006513247,0.00014294194,0.00003629399,0.26388517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9466525,0.0000052800588,0.0000030237293,0.000008014278,0.00040860678,0.0000071469894,0.00016366299,0.000011364878,0.052740443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976051,0.00021337364,0.00033001424,0.0005077383,0.000986951,0.00035684876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985663,0.00009742456,0.00035942037,0.00024555996,0.00041485322,0.00031643495],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014082584,0.00031274802,0.00036441453,0.0002690075,0.018246578,0.0002792631,0.0005743249,0.0002657196,0.000051705516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009560487,0.00027554095,0.00019257526,0.00056057976,0.0011015238,0.0008176928,0.00018401472,0.00056389347,0.0000029525136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026618116,0.0018288238,0.045014184,0.00023449754,0.0022399672,0.040088385,0.2363463,0.00044133427,0.000055252942,0.6681322,0.0049902005,0.00036267107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011957713,0.00022934638,0.031642843,0.000117895856,0.00042140108,0.0002430483,0.2259133,0.000004473355,0.000017714978,0.0002556804,0.7391813,0.0007772637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8652632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9582628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73419106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018535301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010846358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014635824","doi":"","title":"Professors Trevor Farrow and Lesley Jacobs co-edit a new book, “The Justice Crisis: The Cost and Value of Accessing Law”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Value (mathematics); Democracy; Social justice","score_opus":0.05774314603860292,"score_gpt":0.3410671317554176,"score_spread":0.28332398571681466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014635824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52328855,0.03267304,0.0000650011,0.39002147,0.0011504063,0.0032161162,0.00007973663,0.0002494236,0.049256235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846713,0.0008552882,0.00019656267,0.011571785,0.0010206299,0.000045211764,0.000002255056,0.000018446352,0.0016185323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796486,0.00045596185,0.00031278477,0.0003431753,0.00051479915,0.00040843055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985944,0.00058256765,0.0002134923,0.0001730869,0.00011357135,0.00032290458],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006115169,0.00020744164,0.0003281759,0.000009093766,0.0024478184,0.0003606941,0.0004608817,0.00012358294,0.00013874883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008464551,0.00012119573,0.000077872246,0.00023156106,0.0011497916,0.0005803719,0.00020651004,0.00040324903,0.00002895394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023366394,0.00011677595,0.008711378,0.00065755955,0.0004947661,0.000017358421,0.3137248,0.00007007938,0.0013079026,0.3468034,0.3199888,0.007873557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010328274,0.00008385803,0.007033839,0.00013400575,0.00053140696,0.0000019393156,0.10937335,0.000111323156,0.00056638534,0.0007513789,0.87998074,0.00039893904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031428855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010870151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55999196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006685341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000101207195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014967301","doi":"","title":"Same-Sex Partners And Family Class Immigration: Still Not Equal\\nWith Opposite-Sex Partners","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Government (linguistics); Refugee; Discretion; Sexual orientation; Immigration law","score_opus":0.04122675242790113,"score_gpt":0.3248462658984497,"score_spread":0.2836195134705486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014967301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.914512,0.0019152735,0.00017665321,0.017035596,0.0007180058,0.0010576105,0.000052845393,0.00049614685,0.06403589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856627,0.0006075252,0.0011171013,0.0035298157,0.0006714756,0.00008912574,0.000020259891,0.000030168429,0.008271807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690855,0.00026523348,0.00044120953,0.0006512357,0.00090016884,0.0008335921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998519,0.00022345522,0.00018332397,0.00029970345,0.00018957042,0.0005849587],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067219563,0.00036983835,0.0004706895,0.000041768544,0.001555866,0.00044597342,0.00037829796,0.00026542356,0.000118583346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000307145,0.00030998565,0.00014626553,0.00036091352,0.0010804541,0.0007453411,0.00015064864,0.00040865596,0.00030116213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027708174,0.00049473706,0.036992293,0.00014836752,0.00069639855,0.00015349571,0.16190556,0.0013943248,0.008123588,0.75315356,0.02728525,0.009375344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026780576,0.0002762568,0.018739691,0.00013700814,0.00014773705,0.0000039833258,0.059804562,0.000057501937,0.0020794866,0.0036138922,0.9110726,0.0013891924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037124224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035243697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8837874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000508749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019824969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015021014","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Criminal Law Theory: New Canadian Perspectives in the Philosophy of Domestic, Transnational, and International Criminal Law (September 2010)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Philosophy of law; Public law; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Theory of criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Municipal law; Criminal justice; International law","score_opus":0.06828319141865544,"score_gpt":0.3383046271057614,"score_spread":0.270021435687106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015021014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36468092,0.00020109839,0.000022462813,0.08501608,0.00049306726,0.0003121468,0.000014982435,0.000025468578,0.5492338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99641967,0.000021340224,0.0011128763,0.0009897171,0.00034032864,0.000008979207,0.0000036011163,0.0000057237844,0.0010977702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987832,0.00016757706,0.00017846069,0.00020548074,0.00042780384,0.00023750355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990977,0.00044156288,0.000056477063,0.00008606115,0.00019049202,0.00012771114],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008806638,0.00011725464,0.00013741829,0.000055227527,0.0006280936,0.0001314911,0.00035246252,0.000105895706,0.001046111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020282922,0.00007940772,0.0000595252,0.00011313931,0.0013263345,0.0003942523,0.000025014993,0.00033300524,0.000005283923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010330295,0.00002168832,0.00036236,0.0000044017315,0.000019977524,0.0000029404769,0.18864597,0.000001060144,0.000058827776,0.8104485,0.00028066643,0.00014322535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006202457,0.00004367912,0.04651367,0.000023207236,0.0000870143,0.00001279081,0.19950667,0.000024101768,0.00004838194,0.72684526,0.025975164,0.0002997796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41408244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9094661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6317388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010844926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017442585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015087381","doi":"","title":"The security of freedom essays on Canada's anti-terrorism bill","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Key (lock); Legislation; Action (physics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.021140125392009934,"score_gpt":0.2822883082188172,"score_spread":0.26114818282680724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015087381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67240053,0.00022214327,0.0000029581743,0.03594878,0.00073822023,0.00025365056,0.000008695334,0.000047152575,0.2903779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944286,0.00043993944,0.000020157047,0.00016033463,0.00018977432,0.0000058174987,6.348418e-7,0.0000035592784,0.0047512287],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998773,0.000120054174,0.00015582654,0.00013023616,0.00052036747,0.00030053104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992858,0.00030806323,0.00007259392,0.00012864442,0.00012923908,0.0000756469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003522989,0.0000864787,0.00013809856,0.00000787239,0.0011104549,0.00003180736,0.000279165,0.000052218344,0.00015238023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003145826,0.000040756222,0.00005177618,0.0001763927,0.00037808917,0.000057063167,0.000050043494,0.00010551234,0.000009980531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006133074,0.00028896128,0.16376247,0.000021150177,0.00029260782,0.000044676115,0.09154712,0.00017036118,0.00020306504,0.2578658,0.47433764,0.011404851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002511836,0.00003710236,0.059908442,0.000014517474,0.000013950161,3.7120972e-7,0.04515886,0.00006902834,0.00013737954,0.0017288259,0.8924763,0.00020402187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9816242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9900108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41813868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001954105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013744851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85408336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015793245","doi":"","title":"Thin-Skull Plaintiffs, Socio-Cultural \"Abnormalities\" and the Dangers\\nof an Objective Test for Hypersensitivity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Tort; Supreme court; Compensation (psychology); Test (biology); Contributory negligence; Damages","score_opus":0.020533462841639323,"score_gpt":0.28229005349389474,"score_spread":0.2617565906522554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015793245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91517156,0.00053089677,0.00006871643,0.016086055,0.0007857873,0.0017480637,0.00014176851,0.0003320954,0.06513503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99263966,0.00009929421,0.0006962974,0.0018746569,0.0012992052,0.00013018858,0.000020011381,0.000021019596,0.0032196583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727005,0.0008445077,0.0002687448,0.0004720024,0.00048183763,0.00066285837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996621,0.002296598,0.00016758144,0.00025301124,0.00038426754,0.00027752842],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021553836,0.0002863916,0.00044765594,0.00001656241,0.0043818327,0.00045542023,0.00032780544,0.0001999752,0.000048919967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026678191,0.00018247451,0.00019670384,0.00013589712,0.0027568017,0.00092555553,0.00013945876,0.00036311673,0.000051337793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027266057,0.00016240006,0.008098529,0.00006994933,0.00024420675,0.000004906007,0.19988014,0.000019355095,0.00060118554,0.78105706,0.006365311,0.0032243112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0072739627,0.00046284494,0.046840895,0.000103933526,0.0003549939,0.000014266228,0.36689764,0.00076946575,0.0007412153,0.023013774,0.55188096,0.0016460746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035022967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041660313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7580433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023414487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005736867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015820676","doi":"","title":"Toward the full and proper implementation of Jordanâs Principle: An elusive goal to date","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed Central","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Payment; Service (business); Human services; Human rights; House of Commons","score_opus":0.0404460301276913,"score_gpt":0.32844372727598437,"score_spread":0.28799769714829304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015820676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9799468,0.000051053503,0.0000335493,0.017952073,0.0002520201,0.00096582115,0.000027613605,0.000024329636,0.0007467389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988017,0.00009661247,0.00017106347,0.0001410992,0.00034391435,0.00013846924,0.0000020615269,0.000005176026,0.00029991262],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849284,0.0001462332,0.00015731847,0.00017862745,0.0003017008,0.00072327926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994603,0.00004734925,0.000072315255,0.00008854655,0.000080142316,0.00025134807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053841557,0.00008452032,0.000108348206,0.000012171223,0.00030732644,0.000048414957,0.00018891651,0.00003002638,0.00009282571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021361689,0.00004062571,0.000028768121,0.000098527256,0.00025167948,0.00028644496,0.00010598537,0.000040444487,0.0000062871813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000130586,0.000083828534,0.21725418,0.00002789584,0.00014426887,0.0000033644626,0.39508048,0.0000033003676,0.005774175,0.0339618,0.0018411399,0.345695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037210653,0.000046698213,0.90519565,0.0000065355803,0.000020255578,4.632464e-7,0.025895761,7.9033975e-7,0.0018165833,0.00011876845,0.066415936,0.000110467765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030160474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007909364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68794143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017252138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006677284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45593816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015853058","doi":"","title":"Uneasy Partners: Multiculturalism and Rights in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Civil rights; Ethnic group; Legislation; Immigration; Work (physics); Citizenship","score_opus":0.031253551801445706,"score_gpt":0.2668752987429851,"score_spread":0.2356217469415394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015853058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7350893,0.00001357241,0.0000012515679,0.0008898267,0.0002712313,0.00044315096,0.000011200831,0.00006391994,0.26321656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881054,0.011339084,0.00020367128,0.00008524069,0.00015296576,0.000002737647,0.000004549306,0.000005402374,0.00010095746],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984135,0.00025584985,0.00012915308,0.00024328586,0.00031719715,0.00064100255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937665,0.00014661858,0.00007555383,0.00010704489,0.00008796112,0.00020617805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018446766,0.00017875773,0.00022071408,0.0005886889,0.00065884856,0.000040028674,0.00021937484,0.000090819645,0.000034424367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010503454,0.00015083239,0.00004633707,0.0026372825,0.00021533512,0.0007562533,0.00012921852,0.00018042594,0.000008921757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012662377,0.00035833305,0.19607468,0.000086084976,0.00026705457,0.00031152726,0.74530137,0.00002133905,0.00001581634,0.04139969,0.0033929248,0.012644553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000482023,0.000008050276,0.01221109,0.000020086927,0.000026365604,9.864534e-7,0.025851145,0.000012658872,0.000032097214,4.7753343e-7,0.961111,0.000244032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9995899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99954003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9577181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017249507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003962965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6150766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7016114828","doi":"","title":"Walking the Line: Canada's Response to Child Custody Law Reform Discourses","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child custody; Law reform; Action (physics); Legislation; Reform Act","score_opus":0.01405200862081439,"score_gpt":0.28559518979051457,"score_spread":0.27154318116970017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7016114828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5784468,0.00096537446,0.000007996284,0.23329465,0.0012410705,0.00094518997,0.00005125136,0.00021972964,0.18482791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987458,0.0000524275,0.00021771628,0.0070667528,0.0009480433,0.00006609297,0.0000037353873,0.00002161794,0.0041655973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973858,0.0002980679,0.00029212507,0.00036670727,0.0009093259,0.00074798526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998776,0.00021613642,0.00010108656,0.0003624055,0.00014189021,0.0004024454],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010389799,0.00023897305,0.0002607436,0.000017985842,0.0041982327,0.0002655665,0.0007091742,0.00010596819,0.00014032764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007958889,0.00015011149,0.00011035779,0.00037854945,0.0005522431,0.0003334414,0.00020330312,0.00043517927,0.00016788424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003993383,0.00012971905,0.000746079,0.000021262482,0.00017361059,0.00008860708,0.04552549,0.00071146636,0.00055386405,0.9417147,0.008343939,0.0015919441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041891434,0.000054916418,0.009721383,0.00010435705,0.000029128601,0.0000027655794,0.021316854,6.510846e-7,0.0006227167,0.0008933054,0.96646994,0.0003650723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97833663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.958126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023117277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043096548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99709815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7016296748","doi":"","title":"What we have yet failed to achieve: a study of Charles Taylor's Canadian social criticism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Work (physics); Social criticism; Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.030768180002583415,"score_gpt":0.3128989957268909,"score_spread":0.2821308157243075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7016296748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9483462,0.0002821719,7.557253e-9,0.0011945672,0.0047475602,0.002797525,0.0010986184,0.00017573257,0.041357614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98259586,0.000401237,0.00009329357,0.00036720248,0.00033797187,0.00050870626,0.00024529337,0.00015339736,0.0152970385],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929917,0.0009933995,0.0011243973,0.0013107387,0.001999992,0.0015798139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958689,0.00041522662,0.0006345443,0.000530959,0.0014452765,0.0011050988],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013851639,0.0009503582,0.0014262659,0.00052554294,0.0070809717,0.0005370039,0.0015082987,0.0015370857,0.00061706686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00230382,0.0009586326,0.0004731443,0.000835345,0.0002947884,0.0015760765,0.00020151163,0.00230756,0.00027258843],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013526924,0.0041145263,0.0020072581,0.0014663998,0.0038084385,0.00053314393,0.18916063,0.000012504124,0.028860264,0.16668053,0.00067824614,0.6013254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016505674,0.00060644106,0.013066221,0.00058913993,0.0006193884,0.0000014675633,0.67678416,0.0000012265074,0.0032928137,0.0060330997,0.2948865,0.0024689862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43131524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98443806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5988564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018983531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024009588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017217481","doi":"","title":"The Alberta Legal Services Mapping Project: Pilot District Interim Report","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Administration (probate law); Key (lock); Component (thermodynamics)","score_opus":0.041817629423380444,"score_gpt":0.3039087099332046,"score_spread":0.26209108050982416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017217481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6745062,0.0011203666,0.00001373518,0.008130738,0.0012903272,0.00093667087,0.000009687032,0.00027505792,0.31371722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9573352,0.00042495315,0.00021274034,0.0005075269,0.0008757278,0.00011268335,0.000013075207,0.000019504207,0.0404986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744135,0.0002533947,0.00047193808,0.00044139152,0.00070511375,0.0006867808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986163,0.00034543546,0.00025977174,0.00037659306,0.00020985714,0.00019204874],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006431891,0.00024298055,0.00028287133,0.000022371984,0.0051137717,0.00039072134,0.00070946425,0.000096721866,0.00011337115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005966148,0.00016082033,0.0001488987,0.00043503987,0.00083100534,0.0006749523,0.0002665987,0.00035919712,0.00027881382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042577973,0.0010960425,0.21603245,0.0003728465,0.0014205658,0.0021509996,0.2257463,0.000021658409,0.0026641244,0.4008912,0.14145964,0.007718351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022116526,0.00005243741,0.018593766,0.00004652927,0.000015654006,0.000041420466,0.010831614,0.00000801783,0.00006024956,0.00014207399,0.9697113,0.00027574052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43334088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27179128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82825166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003087733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016932077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017422923","doi":"","title":"Appealing to higher authority : explaining the Federal Government's appeals to the Supreme Court of Canada in charter cases","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Charter; Government (linguistics); Judicial review; Victory; Context (archaeology); Court of record; Legislation","score_opus":0.03757363454004791,"score_gpt":0.2832660218393896,"score_spread":0.24569238729934167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017422923","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9167952,0.00029537763,4.762625e-8,0.003358241,0.002062191,0.0017152999,0.0007838206,0.00006379525,0.07492605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799282,0.000082888495,0.00006589817,0.000998754,0.00022367589,0.00029877288,0.00004006957,0.000062144325,0.018299611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938268,0.0009239174,0.0008811743,0.00076534145,0.0024738903,0.0011288527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753094,0.00082018215,0.00047411464,0.00046504455,0.00033522001,0.00037451618],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002163921,0.0005797878,0.0007436587,0.00006113154,0.0048144558,0.00018430078,0.0011709995,0.00036569402,0.0003254472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021463316,0.00040446877,0.00022090586,0.00071378396,0.00010328528,0.00034832966,0.00022137149,0.001106631,0.000044005064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028840913,0.0020201644,0.013589303,0.002375376,0.0044870037,0.0012978003,0.10462888,0.0033508106,0.021120049,0.4473525,0.027196446,0.36969757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064570335,0.00014448265,0.041276358,0.0009100914,0.00015319273,0.0000037366028,0.09533231,0.000011157474,0.0028793174,0.00054766965,0.8565663,0.0015296509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9710244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8293699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033812735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013375872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017710310","doi":"","title":"Book Reviews: Religon, Sex and Politics: Christian Churches and Same-sex Marriage in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Pretext; Hyporeflexia; Gestational period; TSG101; Demotion; Diafiltration","score_opus":0.02016534349079384,"score_gpt":0.22843972823758166,"score_spread":0.20827438474678783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017710310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86459035,0.019413507,0.00004804979,0.005021616,0.00037793675,0.0008070106,0.000118238226,0.000056003893,0.109567314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895935,0.0015608474,0.00007740151,0.00025774402,0.00016540565,0.000001268426,0.000013835676,0.000005600689,0.008324386],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984966,0.00019144162,0.0002635619,0.00028617182,0.00045684553,0.00030541443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907964,0.00021427985,0.00015307417,0.00014433764,0.00014268467,0.00026598974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030434402,0.000180382,0.0003499843,0.00004730595,0.00087369204,0.00007448756,0.00022782543,0.00009372083,0.000012990596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034902475,0.00014650231,0.000057608282,0.00012356037,0.0014021173,0.0004802581,0.00015253382,0.00019528808,0.000006110391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018264727,0.00012489097,0.76322377,0.00020681291,0.00022281561,0.00050688453,0.062305123,0.00012804137,0.000025791473,0.01992875,0.1493253,0.0038191855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077093014,0.00004191982,0.11139991,0.00016474127,0.00003832508,0.00003089102,0.02332899,0.0000435598,0.000015678017,0.0005664453,0.86329854,0.0003000832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8438694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4523781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7139732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008213204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00115988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6719821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018063867","doi":"","title":"CharterWithout Borders? The Supreme Court of Canada, Transnational\\nCrime and Constitutional Rights and Freedoms","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Comity; Deportation; Jurisprudence; Human rights; Deference; Habeas corpus","score_opus":0.014070708020285604,"score_gpt":0.2618538402923396,"score_spread":0.247783132272054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018063867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89941865,0.00225889,0.00022869546,0.0633083,0.00060391956,0.00077922404,0.00018374923,0.00006524303,0.033153355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986344,0.000031765474,0.0002885594,0.0003784225,0.00016380505,0.000014504146,0.0000049188307,0.0000031498644,0.00048045366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988015,0.00007119136,0.00019219787,0.00018199616,0.00051265326,0.00024044127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936557,0.00013522616,0.000067829,0.000077689285,0.00020628462,0.00014739197],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000305901,0.00011393108,0.00016783999,0.000011153813,0.0013375523,0.000055647008,0.00014050491,0.0000616218,0.0001320705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010451123,0.00007610791,0.000032587228,0.00008812924,0.0040255915,0.0002067528,0.000025241501,0.00013499848,0.0000018924012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071367344,0.00001593746,0.0016178723,0.0000074819136,0.00004371784,0.0000018523485,0.005330393,0.000019544435,0.000068268455,0.9916876,0.0011791706,0.000021056878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034503173,0.000090169415,0.11883648,0.00009679403,0.00013300637,0.000010660512,0.012831322,0.000022902766,0.00081485923,0.07430883,0.78868824,0.00071639486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5810645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89758974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9173787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015943767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044016063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018098546","doi":"","title":"Commentary on Macdonald: The Principles of Fundamental Justice—Prospects for Canadian Constitutionalism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UF Law Scholarship Repository (University of Florida)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Constitution; Perspective (graphical); Feature (linguistics)","score_opus":0.043236995087699,"score_gpt":0.2675835810653192,"score_spread":0.2243465859776202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018098546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92770994,0.00026562024,0.000007431239,0.016652144,0.0015170614,0.00085335854,0.00032894485,0.000036477013,0.052628998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973062,0.000012572704,0.0002815002,0.0010166919,0.00019350482,0.0000051195975,0.000020096366,0.0000050555122,0.0011592592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842393,0.00027828294,0.0001356547,0.00021005537,0.0006877777,0.00026430955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990398,0.0002863951,0.00017634894,0.0001650363,0.00018449203,0.0001479021],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000728672,0.000102655926,0.00017333386,0.000040667543,0.008226014,0.0000344984,0.000563969,0.000060318158,0.00014230951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006546659,0.00010353454,0.0001527841,0.00017538777,0.0012554438,0.00025496515,0.00016148333,0.00029856196,0.000002580349],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001790943,0.00010997571,0.029106,0.00005666124,0.00021531773,0.000037447408,0.018873455,0.00035824665,0.0007263575,0.94332325,0.006953994,0.00006020138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089509465,0.00020093526,0.059420034,0.000042006333,0.00023882782,0.0000048676447,0.072597906,0.00002767205,0.00047900202,0.0007325888,0.8651024,0.00025867246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19800913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16001368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94259065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010602775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029528214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019257546","doi":"","title":"Former dean, former chief justice of Ontario Superior Court share Justice Medal","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medal; Economic Justice; Administration (probate law); Administration of justice","score_opus":0.024435753883450224,"score_gpt":0.28884595588764994,"score_spread":0.26441020200419973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019257546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83347917,0.0004870333,0.000012076209,0.0016261251,0.0014441013,0.0008349639,0.00006390234,0.00011075555,0.16194189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616112,0.00009286783,0.0013815957,0.0010139926,0.000639166,0.000052471813,0.000026207077,0.000031513227,0.035150975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970088,0.00012656917,0.0005108491,0.00048205655,0.0010084562,0.00086328335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983317,0.0002828496,0.00022127974,0.00034263983,0.00045057264,0.00037091752],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006078616,0.00032123382,0.0005517346,0.000037827744,0.0011622733,0.00015068144,0.000624578,0.00026805885,0.0068879244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054147944,0.0002665696,0.0002471332,0.0002714466,0.0004412073,0.0009988535,0.0001978964,0.000514054,0.0015370211],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069146673,0.00094944565,0.23725997,0.0020985627,0.0012263736,0.000054581662,0.3246864,0.00020497249,0.006509015,0.34949252,0.07338168,0.0034449934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012378525,0.0001677502,0.045729015,0.00015788325,0.0005822759,0.000002879102,0.025223842,0.000017109533,0.00055990927,0.00033458124,0.9253446,0.0006423164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2501441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5403006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8519629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095062004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004917828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019565105","doi":"","title":"Human Rights Denied: Single Mothers on Social Assistance in British Columbia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Single mothers; Government (linguistics); Tribute; Social assistance; Work (physics); Public assistance; Social policy","score_opus":0.024943226699875202,"score_gpt":0.2874923809535168,"score_spread":0.2625491542536416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019565105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9013339,0.00018638921,6.569494e-7,0.0016342358,0.00020401373,0.0003222562,0.000015612171,0.00015413576,0.09614877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97781026,0.000008128937,0.0002743743,0.00070174225,0.0010999765,0.000044522054,0.0000040949144,0.000019001414,0.02003787],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977568,0.0002585952,0.00031529067,0.00041697256,0.0006220777,0.0006302686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994096,0.00007082288,0.00012201689,0.00013105411,0.000090122165,0.00017635075],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039485338,0.00014401585,0.0003014965,0.00001792194,0.0031875113,0.00089032156,0.00036106913,0.00020471355,0.0012778486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009848918,0.00020148605,0.00012606307,0.00027260807,0.00059183355,0.00043143894,0.00005027157,0.00034890024,0.0002892556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000818855,0.003503278,0.19680853,0.0000980374,0.0003802218,0.00031313303,0.07181816,0.00014984206,0.0031805823,0.1772273,0.5187866,0.02765241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009752493,0.00005085628,0.16206968,0.00009633277,0.000015108194,7.302566e-7,0.0026118734,0.000003085755,0.0000659472,0.002385577,0.8312309,0.0004946623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5000116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9876351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48762345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010859763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003237792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020350247","doi":"","title":"Lessons from India's constitutional culture: what Canada can learn","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Ideology; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Economic Justice; Social rights","score_opus":0.024113032850586042,"score_gpt":0.2801419250843484,"score_spread":0.25602889223376235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020350247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7884723,0.0035189837,3.222919e-8,0.0011953544,0.008236996,0.0015425234,0.0049043903,0.0003415851,0.19178781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94500905,0.003568086,0.000194938,0.00094802683,0.00039367226,0.0002870826,0.003492022,0.000079675156,0.04602746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937293,0.00072941824,0.0008003913,0.0012505106,0.0022469687,0.0012433911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965473,0.0004596021,0.0007141128,0.00044051316,0.0010739516,0.0007645469],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005354296,0.0008988264,0.00095730904,0.00011086915,0.007329032,0.00066830096,0.0011406298,0.0012292777,0.0016418095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018615333,0.00084328925,0.0003641991,0.00056952925,0.00082340627,0.0017395989,0.00016669158,0.002131656,0.00037627656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010205007,0.00027219922,0.00042443434,0.00019402715,0.0017268548,0.0002156177,0.0027241765,0.000035588208,0.0040066163,0.85846347,0.0028228036,0.12901218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062770647,0.000030832412,0.005800059,0.0005484348,0.00028221268,0.000002442441,0.05017567,9.928385e-7,0.0028700936,0.00826815,0.92977184,0.0016215771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92863536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98397475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.926949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050015333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013074209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020401896","doi":"","title":"&lt;em&gt;R v. Turtle&lt;/em&gt;: Substantive Equality Touches Down in Treaty 5 Territory","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Suspect; Treaty; Criminal justice; Criminal court; Indigenous","score_opus":0.030240597552403412,"score_gpt":0.294709229128924,"score_spread":0.26446863157652056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020401896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9209564,0.004323644,0.000009082627,0.0031060262,0.0010572044,0.0005504247,0.00010165743,0.00026158517,0.06963403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867882,0.0005458954,0.0005458098,0.0006987344,0.0010709955,0.00009827473,0.000039721992,0.000031728996,0.010180599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950087,0.0011859116,0.000670241,0.00089238567,0.0011609807,0.0010817469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979253,0.0005252145,0.00022126148,0.0004898943,0.0003969381,0.00044142778],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012827609,0.00044290713,0.000739345,0.00005612613,0.001321606,0.00040811388,0.00058181415,0.00040238534,0.0014363347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012765022,0.00039265526,0.00033552074,0.00072446885,0.0007514948,0.00083753944,0.00028503194,0.00062280166,0.0005042047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040892244,0.0021531917,0.19100092,0.00035467022,0.0010322302,0.0010572481,0.3158693,0.000069520676,0.028002644,0.39389282,0.048345804,0.01781272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002114171,0.000096380594,0.27916455,0.0002672541,0.00011639343,0.0000044480503,0.061349776,0.000014100965,0.005922006,0.0042765085,0.64523524,0.001439154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027640602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4382777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59688944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011544507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031016793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020432691","doi":"","title":"Lest Law Forget: Locke's Toleration and Religious Freedom","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Religious freedom; Conscience; Freedom of religion; Supreme court; Charter; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice","score_opus":0.014977088311792619,"score_gpt":0.26940261232594154,"score_spread":0.2544255240141489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020432691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83882016,0.0018808584,0.00001424404,0.005916491,0.0008648196,0.000713947,0.000012716457,0.0002161227,0.15156065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923813,0.00030694608,0.00054745784,0.0010752516,0.0005774614,0.00002637904,0.000008655437,0.000015846108,0.0050607435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984599,0.00012538854,0.0002257729,0.0003477818,0.00042926508,0.00041190232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999242,0.000119773904,0.00009254694,0.00019709038,0.00014010865,0.00020846161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035326643,0.00017115439,0.0002481598,0.000015114389,0.0010529693,0.00027495602,0.00020410323,0.00016593195,0.00014692792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013331459,0.0001465635,0.00007406139,0.0001359308,0.00044787067,0.000535874,0.00010098106,0.00021654894,0.00060116546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033785964,0.000070644935,0.03460672,0.00004799355,0.000077149656,0.000009296748,0.015893454,0.00005197178,0.0015541525,0.9264663,0.020097485,0.0010910757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082356844,0.00009452237,0.0074054743,0.000059368063,0.000030842308,0.0000018655838,0.0051973304,0.000052155738,0.00039692965,0.004919021,0.9805615,0.0004574326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.077599324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10965828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.960464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016415896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037904967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92854303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020579064","doi":"","title":"Medicare and the Law: Contours of an Evolving Relationship","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health law; Health care; Insurance law; Health insurance; Public health; Health services; Public health law","score_opus":0.04106299220771441,"score_gpt":0.2951297527952151,"score_spread":0.25406676058750066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020579064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65357125,0.0029260342,0.000009913257,0.0037620142,0.00031166873,0.00050793745,0.000010102236,0.00010561145,0.3387955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99794567,0.000060953975,0.0006865896,0.00035275554,0.00018802444,0.000021872493,0.0000017897272,0.000006713115,0.00073563773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985963,0.00043884094,0.0002032589,0.00016692665,0.0003678607,0.00022677354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989313,0.0004445407,0.00011656651,0.00016432822,0.00017954466,0.00016373814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001090016,0.00009405656,0.00019374353,0.000009688836,0.0012224751,0.000060318405,0.00025944377,0.000099330595,0.0003359144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013396542,0.00005954925,0.000058451584,0.000106062886,0.0019716132,0.00047439156,0.00006821341,0.00020300606,0.00002248494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002125463,0.000017822107,0.025912987,0.000008130165,0.000028969504,0.0000014915673,0.062244955,3.0450406e-7,0.000010825064,0.911078,0.00043637233,0.00023891743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003915492,0.00015166865,0.6211066,0.00020324472,0.0002409141,0.0000028418642,0.2098021,0.00005836039,0.00028371252,0.09697424,0.06659446,0.0006663181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11440015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08536445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8141037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055255587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003411291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9402414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020653648","doi":"","title":"A Life of Oneâs Own: Freedom and Obligation in the Novels of Henry James","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Personhood; Kantian ethics; Obligation; Private law; Liability; Reasonable person; Negative liberty","score_opus":0.007948571281931396,"score_gpt":0.196593512309966,"score_spread":0.18864494102803459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020653648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8446476,0.0027845306,8.736052e-7,0.0049812086,0.00025036823,0.00036743953,0.00017444188,0.0000031264938,0.14679044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99639404,0.000807632,0.0001319009,0.00021638282,0.00008233287,0.000010852154,0.000021417201,0.000007812599,0.0023276485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755895,0.00013837134,0.00033794768,0.00014040883,0.0016210779,0.00020321357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989223,0.00046181108,0.00039276495,0.000090530186,0.0000023212763,0.00013026262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000045118493,0.00014746778,0.00032627725,0.000020445885,0.0001990503,0.000013790221,0.00021262596,0.0000592297,0.00001953065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042438664,0.00010971481,0.000031175066,0.00010359487,0.00022276855,0.00027960664,0.000041593346,0.00014454356,7.2020223e-10],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011919658,0.00027272894,0.3060714,0.003168603,0.00066818896,0.00001864592,0.1777597,0.00004061836,0.01836741,0.44990405,0.006276733,0.03625993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030888495,0.00004368922,0.7528805,0.00033680123,0.000059045688,2.433605e-7,0.22719513,0.000028146711,0.0046318737,0.0008733431,0.013410151,0.00023217466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1585565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52765924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4490307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009980069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012237696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84704673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7021243920","doi":"","title":"In a Nutshell: An Attempted Assault on Access to MAiD","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Nova scotia; Legislature; Supreme court; Legislative intent; High Court","score_opus":0.056502298400217574,"score_gpt":0.3470001580969478,"score_spread":0.2904978596967302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7021243920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8517078,0.000090620495,0.000010336714,0.080927186,0.00043388983,0.00088469445,0.000020903282,0.00026599332,0.06565854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974032,0.00003183181,0.00033082132,0.023264214,0.00082855567,0.00008114913,0.0000057827397,0.000020541627,0.0014051001],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974786,0.00034046103,0.00028329444,0.0005232391,0.00080473773,0.0005696405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879795,0.000116021074,0.00007171167,0.00020224901,0.00013989836,0.00067219144],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046573588,0.0002096584,0.00031366482,0.000034001096,0.00062830414,0.00038002888,0.0007917854,0.00018629877,0.0011072105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000811037,0.00018398673,0.00008111485,0.00068383303,0.00016763693,0.0009871272,0.00019560888,0.0004730605,0.00174213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086593715,0.001191825,0.1731887,0.00017236767,0.00024969436,0.00040518644,0.1929039,0.0009023823,0.006344246,0.2699274,0.34724984,0.0065985047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009034956,0.00025679087,0.05400637,0.00007029938,0.000015520674,2.850432e-7,0.0070013376,0.000036811147,0.0009183957,0.0007526111,0.93543273,0.00060533086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038446978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058433127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5881829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003119698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007062584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7023555315","doi":"","title":"Patient v. God: Determining the Standard of Care for Christian Science Practitioners in Medical Negligence Cases","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Standard of care; Faith; Lawsuit; Liability; Prayer; Subject (documents); Bad faith; Faith healing; Medical malpractice","score_opus":0.02487832448403333,"score_gpt":0.3400245148270556,"score_spread":0.31514619034302227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7023555315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98892987,0.00046214522,0.00003518943,0.0029335953,0.0005709953,0.000698252,0.000048260616,0.000036563182,0.0062851454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982973,0.000064927466,0.00086730416,0.00038608795,0.00027887782,0.0000687296,0.0000025263892,0.000006362422,0.00002791529],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977811,0.00013375412,0.00028793328,0.00027887023,0.0010901187,0.0004282162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825037,0.00048838876,0.00016576714,0.00016406793,0.000739294,0.00019210673],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090879627,0.000110027424,0.0002008008,0.000032301657,0.0019984343,0.00009998274,0.0004341822,0.00007909288,0.00017605405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059335823,0.00007505892,0.000060558665,0.00043233027,0.0033995796,0.0004135374,0.00012947168,0.00015757862,0.000012712472],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006088796,0.00029359068,0.09165011,0.00025390543,0.00008463975,0.00006396214,0.6447611,0.00004161503,0.0007034871,0.1686655,0.0064500156,0.086423196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014489383,0.0017817027,0.03425431,0.0006849317,0.000054519525,0.0000048512443,0.40629685,0.000081543076,0.0075249355,0.0008603438,0.54630274,0.0007043249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020740855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.122257054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53985274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040281497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005375006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024439063","doi":"","title":"(Review) Life Sciences Law in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Diafiltration; Liquation; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Durvalumab","score_opus":0.025158368113985287,"score_gpt":0.23566401521886218,"score_spread":0.2105056471048769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024439063","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059512064,0.003641556,0.0000025885681,0.6080008,0.00043592873,0.0005581118,0.000021891996,0.00019301375,0.32763404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93649226,0.0151518285,0.0008971288,0.008211585,0.00016409832,0.0000018020698,0.000007542626,0.000014269049,0.039059494],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982615,0.00034614687,0.000116511874,0.00029158255,0.0005245411,0.000459711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916506,0.00013608266,0.00008707382,0.0001193068,0.000059544152,0.00043290577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019262928,0.00014156944,0.00025736573,0.000049993643,0.00066934957,0.000034523742,0.0006128654,0.000059311435,0.00024638794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021102288,0.00013307836,0.00005448734,0.00088904507,0.0006043245,0.0015102803,0.00025692483,0.0001735495,0.0000433543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008461787,0.000018066528,0.043639455,0.00003230279,0.000012930094,0.000047540674,0.0026163757,0.000028690401,8.989928e-8,0.02680264,0.9267018,0.00009164489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021077937,0.000018884724,0.0060244002,0.00013222187,0.000011768278,2.8849845e-8,0.03081766,0.0000014986801,0.000010317536,0.00013457057,0.96242243,0.00021541392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99733424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97050786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8769802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085017196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031371852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5565232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7025122317","doi":"","title":"Tribunals, Trials, and Tribulations: The Impact of Administrative Law on Religious Freedom in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Judicial review; Supreme court; Charter; Deference; Judicial independence; Politics; Legitimacy; Political question; Common law","score_opus":0.029211021612811028,"score_gpt":0.2916726830988903,"score_spread":0.26246166148607925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7025122317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8306855,0.00093070284,0.0000012298278,0.1073412,0.0003326319,0.0020426032,0.0011077673,0.000039433085,0.057518955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837344,0.0018919276,0.00003840087,0.000043053868,0.000074137846,0.0000028351158,0.00029812203,0.000010730087,0.01390634],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968847,0.0016253478,0.00033771247,0.0002662466,0.0006178557,0.00026812125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966032,0.0022842768,0.00061234034,0.00022107302,0.00019617943,0.00008295076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047617257,0.00024247017,0.00070559914,0.000070612215,0.0006502193,0.00006518608,0.0004957719,0.00023069447,0.00010084442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007939729,0.00015217619,0.00026052646,0.00063520484,0.0003850914,0.00033379407,0.000050474002,0.000391735,3.5018988e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017449443,0.0003812629,0.010427619,0.0001734912,0.001256,0.00014198812,0.19099261,0.00049903523,0.000012234949,0.114625394,0.6796171,0.00012829005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019142826,0.0005104022,0.19679064,0.00059862254,0.0004413991,2.2083414e-7,0.6999917,0.000006777717,0.0004944887,0.0012545105,0.09732071,0.00067621854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95639825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8474684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58229643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031918837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00223518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6205565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7025264160","doi":"","title":"Violating the Fundamental Rights to Life, Liberty and Security of the Person","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Government (linguistics); Variety (cybernetics); Fundamental rights; Human rights; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.2773285404863174,"score_gpt":0.5304249775543842,"score_spread":0.25309643706806684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7025264160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9734826,0.005024304,0.0000037815596,0.010621312,0.00029513723,0.00069072726,0.000024249806,0.000019223427,0.009838661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997404,0.0008845734,0.000049265887,0.0011779307,0.0003036419,0.000015340724,4.9144575e-7,0.000010822198,0.00015393585],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976653,0.0005582293,0.00040794327,0.0002709201,0.000798737,0.00029888278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983768,0.00046089804,0.00050377153,0.00015983425,0.00019731387,0.00030137252],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009831514,0.0001836876,0.00043603394,0.000042836476,0.0018245986,0.0007628808,0.0019077554,0.00006982703,0.001655104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010601584,0.000097036245,0.00016096825,0.0007258836,0.0004917237,0.0009813636,0.0010451714,0.00034749592,0.000005243052],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010984638,0.000096037824,0.77699125,0.00006370644,0.0002774511,0.000003355562,0.15724458,0.000028827862,0.011577444,0.000694827,0.050099056,0.002813607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003046379,0.000013475917,0.93111634,0.00020857254,0.00008410723,7.8258915e-7,0.017294552,0.00005706051,0.0028012842,0.0016392951,0.04619752,0.0002823508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018725831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021323327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1541251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095280106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007617316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7026925493","doi":"","title":"Canadian Constitutional Law, 5th ed.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.026941133876617233,"score_gpt":0.30875384019289465,"score_spread":0.2818127063162774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7026925493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025427451,0.0010839537,0.0000040078935,0.022963358,0.0013373044,0.00030796244,0.00006941727,0.00010218867,0.94870436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889857,0.0002194198,0.00034045504,0.0016003345,0.0009939048,0.000027426184,0.0000071397376,0.0000069716825,0.0078186365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838656,0.00010043858,0.0001658786,0.00029016082,0.00043952922,0.0006174341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861795,0.00006934197,0.00010498603,0.00033614034,0.00018313297,0.0006884457],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045503693,0.00015063584,0.00019798467,0.00001652767,0.008404457,0.0005530503,0.0006580732,0.00015278914,0.0013597657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070126465,0.00013417468,0.00010024306,0.00004075703,0.0032818005,0.00067425927,0.00010057112,0.00023634773,0.0016938876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025035904,0.000010599731,0.007098996,0.0000038784224,0.000029312121,0.000017475106,0.00095396145,0.0000020384407,0.00001389657,0.9766981,0.014825842,0.00034338387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023173798,0.000008603873,0.016922435,0.000025672287,0.000014032119,0.0000012068148,0.0010466446,0.0000015169928,0.00002894789,0.004204466,0.97729355,0.00022115647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9387373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9792886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97249365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007482455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005544928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027169388","doi":"","title":"Canada Needs a &lt;i&gt;Criminal Code&lt;/i&gt;","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Law reform; Public law; Theory of criminal justice; Repeal; Presumption; Human rights","score_opus":0.026594949739680688,"score_gpt":0.2829563817100952,"score_spread":0.2563614319704145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027169388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5994457,0.0015419876,0.0000095810465,0.018406425,0.002273622,0.0006149058,0.00013965293,0.00020546072,0.37736264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96323913,0.00019331658,0.00032946002,0.0013061921,0.0012838644,0.000056630874,0.000008349498,0.000026251028,0.033556797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687153,0.0002047723,0.0003536448,0.00043122534,0.0011536874,0.0009851285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794644,0.00017411186,0.0002885588,0.0006507876,0.00030978862,0.00063032354],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006332244,0.00031796368,0.00043686575,0.000030359794,0.006573161,0.00067309994,0.0013086535,0.00019817833,0.00083672866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012601684,0.0002793381,0.00016416959,0.00015896422,0.0010980725,0.00070209545,0.00032908106,0.00035590387,0.00035527235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006870909,0.0001309673,0.010887437,0.00008014225,0.00027920396,0.00015996641,0.017454939,0.000019958194,0.0034445543,0.61369044,0.349893,0.0038906825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044771013,0.000030387208,0.031146295,0.000046774905,0.0000659961,0.0000018462281,0.00251687,0.000010159666,0.0001640134,0.00044799582,0.9646911,0.0004308736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91348684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61479807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009363327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092576304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027263651","doi":"","title":"Christ Church Montreal : as parish church and cathedral, a report to the select vestry of the church to the rector of the parish, with appendices, containing opinions of Canadian counsel and evidence of the chief cathedral authorities in England, relative to ecclesiastical law and usage in England and Canada.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Durvalumab","score_opus":0.01116459226790117,"score_gpt":0.22222124589084447,"score_spread":0.2110566536229433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027263651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9211352,0.00019193601,0.0000033883105,0.07601966,0.00005106872,0.0008365856,0.00007355719,0.0000059929293,0.0016825967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861294,0.00023278067,0.00006405848,0.00015845429,0.000032577525,0.000005254468,0.0000013629619,0.0000082095185,0.00088438974],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979498,0.0007849085,0.00022506283,0.0003015164,0.000417001,0.00032171208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979906,0.0013030844,0.00017692544,0.00025696348,0.00008204043,0.00019038485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005889335,0.00016908687,0.0003461692,0.000079413636,0.0007930137,0.00005645122,0.00046238152,0.00010149371,0.000005511507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065717346,0.00008726604,0.000033075332,0.00083100057,0.0011122829,0.0003194798,0.00030909927,0.00035835526,4.3223835e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023180107,0.000022501521,0.74865913,0.0000740962,0.00007419143,0.000012638755,0.24108866,0.00008967372,0.000020008923,0.0072023207,0.0023712895,0.00015365465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003637514,0.00016933365,0.9348076,0.00047963695,0.000045392306,0.0000029882278,0.02654676,0.000014789335,0.000071527844,0.000043165903,0.03732093,0.00013412088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9911719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9924647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21454191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014068601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094680116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60993004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027420131","doi":"","title":"CLE Working Paper No. 3/2022--What is the Test for Interlocutory Injunctions Affecting Homeless Encampments? A critique of Vancouver Fraser Port Authority v Brett and associated case law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interlocutory; Test (biology); Prima facie; High Court; Economic Justice; Common law","score_opus":0.019301202386498136,"score_gpt":0.2911467522075722,"score_spread":0.27184554982107406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027420131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831866,0.0014874937,0.000022427514,0.002787349,0.002978831,0.0015623494,0.00018567602,0.00017565742,0.007613641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946712,0.000109876535,0.00016624526,0.00224575,0.0003237271,0.00036634252,0.000008080259,0.000025084728,0.0020836557],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763453,0.00051396195,0.00038304398,0.0004202752,0.0005456571,0.00050254946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974173,0.0016327999,0.0002698698,0.00021236585,0.0003146215,0.00015307443],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018672807,0.0002172768,0.00037383218,0.000028544473,0.005182887,0.0002635374,0.00027867054,0.0001359202,0.00049798755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012451671,0.00018122215,0.00018859316,0.00036718,0.00054458,0.000778524,0.00035203883,0.0006309884,0.000006173605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004922073,0.0033211163,0.30819097,0.00061211234,0.0027654998,0.0006170979,0.3594008,0.00012119845,0.0036791025,0.07197533,0.2230919,0.025732689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019914892,0.000412737,0.0090446975,0.00029198334,0.00030067645,0.000014683119,0.37351882,0.0001086291,0.00040334306,0.0030775014,0.60989606,0.0009393966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044782866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18070365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38680413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055735215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007904462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027562072","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Cases 2024 (Pt 3B) | Punishment and Policing","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Constitutional law; Supreme court; Constitutional right; Constitutional review","score_opus":0.029665197691563956,"score_gpt":0.316151327943935,"score_spread":0.2864861302523711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027562072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5479355,0.016068006,0.000049178532,0.0298254,0.0035756852,0.0008010261,0.000132653,0.00062067906,0.4009919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98726434,0.00047882754,0.00027940093,0.0006527053,0.000920818,0.000030592393,0.0000050917456,0.000006005691,0.010362213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986541,0.000095847245,0.00017987401,0.00029733632,0.0004047369,0.00036807914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930644,0.00027861082,0.000027720567,0.00008610637,0.00006842727,0.00023269939],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003454252,0.00014622128,0.00016841778,0.000021696505,0.0012780369,0.00044814986,0.00012231652,0.00008849584,0.0009388186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027590554,0.00011732737,0.0000715608,0.00020626967,0.0014808266,0.00039622447,0.0001084032,0.00022857805,0.0003625276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042215734,0.000017230515,0.0032991392,0.000037763803,0.0000719133,0.00008066759,0.004681372,0.000006281507,0.00012431448,0.9715967,0.0188514,0.0012289939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001451837,0.000025181223,0.0023889767,0.00013974332,0.000041710875,0.000016949833,0.0043483395,0.000018050656,0.00009282147,0.0020995212,0.99045664,0.00022686154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06455631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024735255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97160524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033866646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001263725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028599313","doi":"","title":"The Forgotten Foundations of the Canadian Constitution","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Focus (optics); Variety (cybernetics); Element (criminal law); Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.026431668761052265,"score_gpt":0.28893950985284317,"score_spread":0.2625078410917909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028599313","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19633223,0.0009124117,0.0000076109013,0.108943775,0.0031988907,0.0013908718,0.00013856734,0.00008985864,0.68898576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936812,0.000020087125,0.000037475747,0.0007093484,0.00012893256,0.000083457184,0.000003816842,0.0000031032837,0.005332607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987299,0.0002856604,0.00014736949,0.00011143741,0.00044583032,0.0002798213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935174,0.00015682842,0.00008748464,0.0001742419,0.000117694944,0.00011198398],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000641957,0.000062643994,0.00007902841,0.000011011987,0.014644369,0.00011274452,0.00046795094,0.0000324283,0.00042313905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049932295,0.000038312523,0.00008375151,0.0002945069,0.0011391669,0.00012765854,0.00012844066,0.00022593288,0.000038010003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019775214,0.000007887247,0.008770256,0.0000013389598,0.00002352662,4.5987832e-7,0.0033807808,0.000060990347,0.000023682469,0.97825027,0.009174203,0.00030464577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008977346,0.000007599243,0.01389087,0.0000032900289,0.0000133825215,4.6288724e-7,0.008123358,0.0000060890106,0.00001899256,0.0036091022,0.9741736,0.000063492735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8621638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98453945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97464114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008163192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006433574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9866384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028704038","doi":"","title":"Freedom of Religion and Canadaâs Commitments to Multiculturalism: A Critical Analysis of the Rights-based Approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Individualism; Legislation; Politics; Context (archaeology); Freedom of religion; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.006820129876828344,"score_gpt":0.21843094818094488,"score_spread":0.21161081830411654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028704038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8391107,0.0010494839,0.000010570781,0.009796756,0.00045812104,0.0011013609,0.001364011,0.0000122023275,0.14709683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99418175,0.000084294916,0.0008609472,0.00041024757,0.00003009381,0.000012955549,0.000053533833,0.000008153537,0.004358024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964876,0.00019224553,0.00043255504,0.0002825841,0.0023239185,0.0002810527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882066,0.00042130824,0.00031249612,0.0001811439,0.000008467539,0.00025590655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000027543512,0.00023476586,0.00060294307,0.000044150653,0.00056252035,0.000023479597,0.0003427659,0.00007949616,0.000008090352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004683922,0.00016228591,0.00010256601,0.0003584295,0.00030082234,0.00013583577,0.00006010197,0.00015579705,4.3211743e-10],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034131235,0.0008773536,0.10798414,0.003657895,0.008501043,0.00006876703,0.06730719,0.0041121985,0.016986877,0.74810064,0.031839106,0.007151668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009505324,0.0001893132,0.8757354,0.00085250137,0.0028412456,4.8937244e-7,0.062658325,0.002634186,0.019527787,0.0009397714,0.03257388,0.0010965933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6126641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7677512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036164536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009864239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66178274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029115264","doi":"","title":"The Impact of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms on Canadian Family Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Family law; Legislation; Human rights; Derogation","score_opus":0.014783856505965821,"score_gpt":0.2715451670347743,"score_spread":0.2567613105288085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029115264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7991794,0.00042764045,2.8984596e-8,0.0016557609,0.00011554912,0.0002505926,0.000038477865,0.000010991935,0.19832161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99645126,0.00008430196,0.000008928191,0.00040372982,0.00014547691,0.00000877561,7.268967e-7,0.00000543043,0.002891355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883056,0.0001796652,0.00017956235,0.00014463866,0.0003196365,0.00034594242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992757,0.0001511884,0.00007312613,0.00022049333,0.00008057208,0.00019893369],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030303534,0.00011780648,0.00017528232,0.000009081842,0.0016508788,0.00006775903,0.00034320002,0.000082602455,0.00028020068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004869455,0.000054503336,0.00013280357,0.00014104998,0.001374829,0.00012732857,0.000024743755,0.00016593937,0.00005002745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012393543,0.00015063473,0.021296144,0.0000210411,0.00053110096,0.0000071879194,0.04619136,0.00010773075,0.0012095971,0.8758148,0.048530735,0.0060157306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007360144,0.00019765516,0.3890722,0.000108024826,0.000044458564,7.194156e-7,0.0031124111,0.000016124242,0.00050469267,0.0129290335,0.59293336,0.00034529084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9506718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90582365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8628858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017582021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000089187924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029917498","doi":"","title":"&lt;i&gt;Ohenhen (Re)&lt;/i&gt;","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Legislation; Action (physics); Work (physics); Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.025631411265506297,"score_gpt":0.29112484286538054,"score_spread":0.26549343159987426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029917498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33484712,0.002377596,0.000037813563,0.008614764,0.0020998935,0.00074207684,0.000031711483,0.0006427643,0.6506063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9584632,0.00027829292,0.0013465236,0.0016943921,0.0035577663,0.000069126436,0.000008797315,0.000036069636,0.034545857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966228,0.00034554405,0.0004086373,0.00059928594,0.0009968206,0.0010269375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819577,0.00022532986,0.00017268209,0.00043153964,0.00043711794,0.00053758104],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087986974,0.00032755669,0.00041820324,0.00004121819,0.0028798808,0.00031003405,0.00079478713,0.00028533462,0.0044077463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000889189,0.00027859735,0.00022097402,0.00046012225,0.001751746,0.000664331,0.0002764273,0.0003050304,0.006653114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006678415,0.00022446648,0.004534727,0.000040909257,0.00028624714,0.00003229413,0.04070103,0.000005016097,0.012138951,0.61773074,0.31942463,0.0048142243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043147508,0.00008312879,0.009050921,0.000041077932,0.000040231836,7.9004866e-7,0.0015044988,0.000007698848,0.000556092,0.0026811745,0.9851595,0.00044338402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006357471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07522612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6657349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004531246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013507956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030550705","doi":"","title":"NIL/TU,O Child and Family Services Society v. B.C. Government and Service Employees’ Union’ and Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada v. Native Child and Family Services of Toronto","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Presumption; Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Treaty; Statute; Context (archaeology); Child protection","score_opus":0.010486245182409521,"score_gpt":0.23468210040047321,"score_spread":0.2241958552180637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030550705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9211191,0.051618446,0.0000017891632,0.016773876,0.00005416806,0.0003573461,0.0001826444,0.000034322038,0.00985832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9595894,0.034400176,0.000430027,0.0054044323,0.000063773856,0.000016215028,0.000014780085,0.00001598359,0.000065212545],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980298,0.00034445905,0.00035361957,0.00041076692,0.0005686206,0.0002927139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987582,0.00019845089,0.000275629,0.00022982295,0.00018582806,0.00035206252],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036833383,0.00026919902,0.00044490257,0.0000057236284,0.0013181801,0.000103457634,0.0003204523,0.00014227044,0.00000818198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026502063,0.00023862129,0.000034859968,0.00016100204,0.00062097714,0.00057712174,0.00069274486,0.0001760227,8.6789555e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031971018,0.00041376497,0.43580744,0.004561802,0.0024391552,0.0000051513944,0.44430637,0.00004076946,0.004716832,0.08894282,0.003775631,0.014670568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014386311,0.00017964783,0.5029053,0.00057389186,0.00015259763,0.0000018753773,0.31047782,0.0003153401,0.00013764696,0.00018633938,0.18306471,0.0005661881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91126215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9651358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17928907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019797675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007475924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030630737","doi":"","title":"The New Wall of Separation: Permitting Diversity, Restricting Competition","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legitimacy; Legislature; Constitutional law; Obligation; Order (exchange); Politics; Common law; Redress; Judicial review","score_opus":0.05090135956236783,"score_gpt":0.38038426112766155,"score_spread":0.3294829015652937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030630737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76190233,0.00096461066,0.00008539507,0.08924538,0.00021124736,0.00025619197,4.16686e-7,0.00009854434,0.14723586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925725,0.00026886535,0.00023070449,0.00009629123,0.00021719649,4.3180623e-7,6.835546e-7,0.0000012727311,0.0066120666],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993182,0.00008421268,0.00008699405,0.00007942767,0.00027786978,0.0001533043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995308,0.00018769629,0.00009377111,0.000057221947,0.000086534536,0.000044009797],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030118544,0.00004725241,0.00007263005,0.000008013903,0.0023408323,0.00004538767,0.00014757,0.000033634544,0.00003564839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029734103,0.000033862387,0.00004074669,0.00015623283,0.00009939041,0.00010153892,0.00007280763,0.0000703568,0.0000128482225],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031273754,0.000051467385,0.02037694,0.0000088573,0.00004703503,0.000003520662,0.7347177,0.00019569487,0.00119909,0.17554328,0.027582174,0.040242914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007256598,0.00017306229,0.2237907,0.00009325124,0.0000691238,9.995251e-7,0.26340076,0.00027232672,0.00081262924,0.0052911313,0.50496876,0.0004015794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011394958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002393376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4773866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007845109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031168747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7033402659","doi":"","title":"Pt 1 Remembering Peter - His Brilliant Legacy: A Conference in Honour of Peter W. Hogg","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Economic Justice; Constitutional law; Session (web analytics); Common law","score_opus":0.033745194698947586,"score_gpt":0.3012863335053523,"score_spread":0.2675411388064047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7033402659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8684666,0.0033192171,0.000028388884,0.003020001,0.0010359165,0.000478569,0.000023492554,0.0002256008,0.12340219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925458,0.0004195569,0.0005894096,0.00020156083,0.00038185657,0.000037497517,0.0000032562175,0.000020367977,0.0058007254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978711,0.0002225295,0.00040034388,0.0004292277,0.0005205889,0.0005561867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992243,0.0001856562,0.00008108175,0.0001964197,0.00013023736,0.0001823015],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069117185,0.0002129242,0.00036713283,0.000057635025,0.00035348674,0.00036947557,0.00034727596,0.00013705155,0.00095551787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036154638,0.00017864197,0.0001671301,0.00036350297,0.00043670522,0.0008600718,0.00015995657,0.00043416856,0.0003652112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019291377,0.00045049877,0.042310257,0.0014394536,0.0007622634,0.0009874793,0.25081238,0.00019140971,0.02699089,0.61859155,0.03399969,0.023271209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005907232,0.00008173966,0.03905397,0.0011227169,0.000060695118,0.000007284182,0.008751161,0.0001687448,0.001765957,0.0019014635,0.94574,0.00075554766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032929074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052872036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9117403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003368762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014299082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7033730692","doi":"","title":"SCC’s ‘Barnburner’ Fall Session Features TWU, Groia, Comeau and Other Hot Cases","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Supreme court; Occupational safety and health","score_opus":0.038645441933677055,"score_gpt":0.32817872819922833,"score_spread":0.2895332862655513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7033730692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89414334,0.0027495855,0.000002412878,0.0057427506,0.00075821875,0.0004551206,0.00003744234,0.00017844804,0.095932685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817748,0.00034234973,0.00032247943,0.0012558103,0.00085822016,0.00003182595,0.0000030517056,0.000022829878,0.015388628],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803144,0.00021167363,0.00021222205,0.00043449906,0.0005521758,0.00055800413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866545,0.0002047221,0.00021673628,0.00042336778,0.00012888403,0.0003608397],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004982841,0.00025496446,0.00034468385,0.000024301635,0.0053629633,0.00088502554,0.00057442463,0.00021803244,0.00029401318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010205952,0.00019178359,0.0001121445,0.00006825234,0.001265387,0.0007116133,0.0002980196,0.0003525164,0.00017720158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024033575,0.00035088666,0.55192137,0.00016606718,0.0003953172,0.00034175592,0.04120201,0.000011382686,0.0027712814,0.28298387,0.10684315,0.012772587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008463383,0.0000687788,0.20114806,0.00016158857,0.00005521733,0.000010169839,0.006340334,0.000003624024,0.00033616443,0.0015247457,0.7889476,0.00055741094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19420041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17000762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6821044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015281857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005131023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7036745041","doi":"","title":"Courts Liberalism And Rights: Gay Law And Politics In The United States and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Diafiltration; Liquation; Emperipolesis; Hemopericardium; Durvalumab","score_opus":0.02308376715207233,"score_gpt":0.2489310658295246,"score_spread":0.22584729867745226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7036745041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9198853,0.000024805455,8.7498256e-7,0.0027498747,0.00006523445,0.00029875548,0.000026599999,0.000025845682,0.07692271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96860206,0.03042238,0.000060528353,0.00077792525,0.00007803373,0.0000011354281,0.000008447182,0.0000046427167,0.000044833105],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888927,0.00028154382,0.000077505196,0.00015184467,0.00020537915,0.0003944593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994184,0.0002850874,0.00004453488,0.00007415923,0.00006137282,0.0001164782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022366614,0.00012406349,0.00013568343,0.0004024743,0.0009280424,0.000076107404,0.00012737866,0.000064222964,0.0000043106984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004061416,0.00008999643,0.000013447462,0.0010490838,0.0005133509,0.00036986746,0.00010367055,0.0001412734,3.1948687e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025939149,0.00009989436,0.035541177,0.00005239036,0.000096886266,0.00009292286,0.6539694,0.0000022383522,7.46609e-7,0.3080645,0.0014046981,0.00064922514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031148296,0.000014484464,0.0049892305,0.000013466135,0.000031713716,0.000002341684,0.030611426,0.000010699757,0.0000050541694,0.000016304206,0.96385485,0.00013897246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99886036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99482614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96245015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024445023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009900081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7137846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7037272184","doi":"","title":"Dignity and Equality: Lawâs Reasonable Claimant and Human Dignity under Section 15","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; TSG101; Hyporeflexia; Gestational period; Pretext; Diafiltration; Dysgeusia; Circumstantial evidence; Demotion","score_opus":0.016058537729752752,"score_gpt":0.22024220167814076,"score_spread":0.20418366394838802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7037272184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6247322,0.00068643014,0.000002276249,0.0008275081,0.00027631188,0.00028283818,0.000121712714,0.000017390752,0.3730533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95147246,0.0009017674,0.00007120651,0.00026501136,0.00014046059,0.000014097454,0.000050842784,0.000017447828,0.047066703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752754,0.00019971415,0.00026921817,0.0003437683,0.0013241078,0.00033567543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913234,0.00020751059,0.00025883413,0.00010442443,0.0000028664497,0.0002940547],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004384429,0.00025151463,0.0003620572,0.000015982818,0.0014648108,0.000074592564,0.00013666764,0.00010580557,0.00004877198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012582876,0.00023035915,0.000029931227,0.00006180418,0.0003255713,0.00045997978,0.00010083122,0.00026308696,2.3744724e-9],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070572604,0.00013146669,0.10682404,0.0015886617,0.0006345674,0.0000418708,0.019916056,0.000002196424,0.005753331,0.8466926,0.0032019152,0.014507546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047985767,0.000102841186,0.79736334,0.00032144543,0.00015528758,0.000001438307,0.121731214,0.000011681031,0.004534118,0.013597499,0.060937624,0.000763679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31792107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86798674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83309513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027688373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073413504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7038064224","doi":"","title":"Fighting for Abortion Access in Canada: A Constitutional Analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Charter; Order (exchange); Politics; Constitutional law; Human rights; Multitude","score_opus":0.0319142895112389,"score_gpt":0.3268187012552184,"score_spread":0.2949044117439795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7038064224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92142904,0.0045840754,0.0014223946,0.017554622,0.0021081888,0.0012839874,0.0003269518,0.00027669294,0.05101402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981277,0.000054545068,0.00026600028,0.00034887713,0.0003366006,0.00010653655,0.000029005492,0.000004199726,0.00072654313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986754,0.00007726746,0.00024593557,0.00027486938,0.00038513666,0.00034137114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993379,0.00030619092,0.000047546375,0.00007121232,0.00011774455,0.000119410164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004233378,0.000102784084,0.00020512774,0.000059749043,0.0006873853,0.00028386686,0.00021271162,0.000059584887,0.0003924034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003997641,0.00008848224,0.000117335694,0.0009039111,0.00027028908,0.00050256,0.00004708796,0.00014998237,0.000018932587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017842307,0.000028733728,0.14292039,0.000087190645,0.0006306105,0.00003770298,0.0032336863,0.0014808117,0.00006150006,0.83777636,0.011112825,0.002612361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004533132,0.000012927544,0.12912701,0.00016159963,0.00040080745,6.426921e-7,0.0055533764,0.0022216255,0.00016957741,0.0036769183,0.8576712,0.000551002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9766178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8465584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001671016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012711195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5286882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7038446903","doi":"","title":"Human Rights in Canada: A History","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.029587077567275456,"score_gpt":0.23770504923837624,"score_spread":0.20811797167110077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7038446903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27994022,0.0000026853024,0.0000039008755,0.0010247617,0.0002569211,0.00031324365,0.00000830897,0.000079246245,0.71837074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960565,0.0026329292,0.000050764567,0.00006192802,0.00009854708,0.0000023844618,9.723907e-7,0.0000063880857,0.0010896159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852884,0.00023850551,0.00012673877,0.00030178984,0.0003436661,0.00046045176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946886,0.00009686836,0.000084575324,0.00014760367,0.000096713135,0.00010536905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015134284,0.00014663872,0.00020153346,0.001538726,0.00056914525,0.00000985446,0.00039067,0.00007936149,0.00021954255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006228433,0.00011167789,0.00006438785,0.001378044,0.0002631244,0.00037382648,0.00010971878,0.00011975971,0.000021639906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019953257,0.00061730173,0.08243163,0.00009220154,0.0004352673,0.0024865617,0.27125314,0.0000061772603,0.00020221205,0.5532267,0.059100207,0.029949062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005671831,0.000015539255,0.0043926574,0.00003488352,0.000013774284,2.5054612e-7,0.0020789097,6.3402223e-7,0.000021858486,0.0000025267564,0.9926609,0.00021092017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99994797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93356067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013968594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018675822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9898166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7039144081","doi":"","title":"Language's Empire: A Counter-Telling of Administrative Law in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Rhetorical question; Administrative law; Pragmatism; Statutory law; Statutory interpretation; Face (sociological concept)","score_opus":0.03444596635754573,"score_gpt":0.32403547870750166,"score_spread":0.28958951234995595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7039144081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89285135,0.00048507753,0.00000310952,0.0011169792,0.00034517096,0.00025780496,0.000034243905,0.000031261046,0.10487498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976225,0.0000330499,0.0002561216,0.00078207615,0.00037076484,0.00001605974,0.0000035327487,0.000009092627,0.0009068421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839145,0.00017129013,0.00029668934,0.0002383989,0.00049510977,0.00040705025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992096,0.00017962408,0.00012707461,0.00014808816,0.00017681255,0.00015884159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000352038,0.00014010342,0.00026935243,0.000013286515,0.00047262872,0.000052157397,0.00028774198,0.00007491631,0.0005099708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022107062,0.00012271231,0.000051028386,0.00024065506,0.0007156188,0.00022704751,0.00005664772,0.00019275215,0.000054173543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024486848,0.00033166909,0.13465422,0.00017317833,0.00034073208,0.00032410366,0.3089271,0.00003348051,0.0032270928,0.53346765,0.015470862,0.0028050651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017652292,0.00033690868,0.034068305,0.0004725716,0.000064871325,0.000003479758,0.29479036,0.00006126356,0.01849635,0.001757406,0.6469608,0.0012224576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99490565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99964887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63148993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073282234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006807999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5583823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7039266045","doi":"","title":"Merging Public Law Silos and Canada's Evolving Constitutional Law Landscape","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Charter; Constitutional law; Public law; Common law; Public interest","score_opus":0.025534808378368565,"score_gpt":0.2791676540431795,"score_spread":0.2536328456648109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7039266045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17848408,0.0018355311,0.000010631582,0.02210367,0.0010539488,0.00036455202,0.000063111554,0.0001425997,0.7959419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960892,0.00007185375,0.00035967634,0.0012808553,0.00063770346,0.000023895585,0.000007816765,0.000008839515,0.0015201672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981022,0.00012042728,0.00023253668,0.00030849097,0.0006511892,0.0005851942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987274,0.00016856677,0.00017637406,0.00027385252,0.00024167901,0.0004121511],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049481983,0.00018913375,0.00026308047,0.000012660137,0.009285757,0.0010709517,0.0004790104,0.00011386157,0.00051251525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006881486,0.00016578514,0.00006129967,0.000050305127,0.0029702892,0.0010836741,0.00024306451,0.0002734734,0.0000448796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003111438,0.000012052924,0.027929869,0.000010526757,0.000049255344,0.000013636064,0.0006329288,0.0000024422964,0.000052790736,0.96644706,0.0047494425,0.000096878626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005616075,0.000011669258,0.015238605,0.00006084947,0.000030978987,0.0000033965919,0.0034406255,0.000029657955,0.00007388002,0.0024513272,0.9776898,0.0004076079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9623445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99287117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9729403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033316325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004159292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042199048","doi":"","title":"Know Your Rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Disadvantaged; Viewpoints; Economic Justice; Human rights; Fundamental rights","score_opus":0.036206679758248074,"score_gpt":0.2881077017293042,"score_spread":0.2519010219710561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042199048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9206795,0.002197443,0.000023922647,0.005942983,0.00074800686,0.0003031572,0.000041128053,0.00035580315,0.06970803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9437028,0.00023667826,0.0005580535,0.00004615487,0.00027643202,5.3860094e-7,0.000010429178,0.000014776417,0.055154108],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977075,0.00031321397,0.00016438162,0.0004856014,0.00078268023,0.00054662564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896663,0.00020549401,0.000091985756,0.0002424962,0.00021634315,0.00027704673],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008611874,0.0002122141,0.0003132257,0.00016701584,0.0024064,0.00012688579,0.0007010731,0.00029315142,0.002544441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015647746,0.00021794335,0.00030603833,0.0007305603,0.0008319825,0.0012347103,0.0002886386,0.00047460885,0.0013223471],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000492381,0.0005966927,0.14866929,0.00063411746,0.0019483599,0.0011055018,0.5540109,0.000044085336,0.012042132,0.18587756,0.06169211,0.032886855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046623553,0.000058378726,0.0871726,0.00020391934,0.00014235021,0.000003404815,0.01729867,0.000019683739,0.00036906768,0.0031311985,0.8906884,0.00044604792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049749287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0089267595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82899636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050270377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013393573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042475084","doi":"","title":"Pintea v Johns: 18 Months Later","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Disadvantage; Supreme court; Order (exchange); Confidentiality; Common law","score_opus":0.04053946778917482,"score_gpt":0.2826299591933842,"score_spread":0.24209049140420935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042475084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9051795,0.0001532337,0.000017993272,0.0038910399,0.00041930377,0.0003277262,0.00002568908,0.00016761148,0.089817904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786761,0.00015174433,0.0009155472,0.00020517784,0.0003905076,6.382076e-7,0.0000073803344,0.000018365152,0.019634543],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746984,0.0003851014,0.00019842724,0.00048237827,0.0007934626,0.00067076535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984412,0.00013870439,0.00021803332,0.00034325602,0.00055408844,0.0003047266],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009296865,0.00023415538,0.0003738254,0.00015304454,0.0028829335,0.000071836184,0.00090534653,0.00032189672,0.0049850103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041255928,0.00025198286,0.00026361438,0.0005960285,0.001990413,0.0011531408,0.00045749615,0.0003746484,0.001479998],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008077697,0.00044391985,0.61636895,0.000093280745,0.00073889876,0.000104971405,0.32259712,0.0000061981195,0.008732349,0.0062733875,0.035685517,0.0081476355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013164278,0.00019480583,0.5362958,0.000103148246,0.0001256802,0.0000022698184,0.038501304,0.000010042092,0.0014300118,0.00078207563,0.4206396,0.0005988637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055290144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01665806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38495407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004264504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000104303734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042683996","doi":"","title":"Poverty: Rights, Social Citizenship, and Legal Activism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Retrenchment; Punitive damages; Social activism; Poverty; State (computer science); Social justice; Social policy; Accountability; Social rights; Entitlement (fair division)","score_opus":0.02281804932006808,"score_gpt":0.29592120986234755,"score_spread":0.27310316054227946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042683996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64540493,0.0005347735,0.000038737766,0.0076383958,0.00063350424,0.00036022387,0.000015062825,0.00027257384,0.34510177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98454005,0.0000452343,0.0003484334,0.0016098075,0.0016696631,0.000011031356,0.0000042056754,0.000016118855,0.011755469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978081,0.00017111107,0.0002552288,0.00037665022,0.0006391331,0.00074980303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906456,0.00024444182,0.00010872576,0.00011806775,0.00012700554,0.00033717218],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090628426,0.00021958844,0.00029974835,0.000031593576,0.0031701927,0.0002937296,0.00024394461,0.00023749759,0.00040024688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022675742,0.00018215452,0.000118893986,0.00023005501,0.0007706992,0.00045580658,0.000120401804,0.0004039719,0.00018101264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006820754,0.000057840905,0.0030621083,0.00001697515,0.00013689947,0.00006845233,0.009515867,2.4243775e-7,0.00070264854,0.94092,0.042474296,0.0029764373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007118847,0.000037632948,0.036439117,0.000020024365,0.00004316056,0.000003739987,0.0041571697,0.0000012751177,0.00056934974,0.013216034,0.9443351,0.0004654814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024574136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034253523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.927704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031098767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050809784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042703787","doi":"","title":"From Prohibition to Permission: The Winding Road of Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Permission; Narrative; Law reform; Confidentiality; Government (linguistics); Medical ethics","score_opus":0.024831176818262298,"score_gpt":0.29653189806369756,"score_spread":0.27170072124543526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042703787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.970202,0.00038864466,0.0000018233762,0.025223782,0.00033957817,0.00032584814,0.000016115415,0.000012975747,0.0034891784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986205,0.000016471888,0.00006538354,0.0007912665,0.00016648667,0.00009302352,0.0000040269533,0.000005450824,0.00023737186],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973586,0.00045316273,0.00028346982,0.00022109889,0.0013856702,0.00029798094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994294,0.000197805,0.00008319009,0.00011182827,0.000032230088,0.0001455217],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010699906,0.00008483673,0.00018517679,0.000020362013,0.00080752716,0.000037459744,0.00043655574,0.00004264281,0.0012180225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006194995,0.000064946544,0.00003062064,0.00047638186,0.000097225435,0.000121480276,0.00022132126,0.0004176409,0.000004923538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018973285,0.00028962002,0.6402727,0.00006693621,0.000079538826,0.00035893632,0.27493826,0.0021458361,0.0022886056,0.03785814,0.023176238,0.018335449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001115341,0.000042115524,0.48209643,0.000434791,0.000012867587,0.0000011630231,0.29866087,0.00039265305,0.00027538528,0.0011986154,0.21527341,0.0004963422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99378955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9968554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19209717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002000398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007555396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042724862","doi":"","title":"Procedural Due Process in Canadian Constitutional Law: Natural Justice and Fundamental Justice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UF Law Scholarship Repository (University of Florida)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural justice; Economic Justice; Process (computing); Natural (archaeology); Procedural justice; Due process","score_opus":0.020014598031905216,"score_gpt":0.2633029171998547,"score_spread":0.2432883191679495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042724862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9513726,0.00050541,9.806332e-7,0.0015413314,0.0010378573,0.00033005985,0.000031098694,0.000045492747,0.04513513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985208,0.000012456709,0.00013953679,0.00032490637,0.00014537372,0.0000031926377,0.00001044767,0.0000050813424,0.0008382318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981404,0.00026824579,0.00014426869,0.00033433855,0.00066022744,0.00045254908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918115,0.00010881833,0.00011654393,0.00009288982,0.0002028185,0.0002977517],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053337595,0.00013908868,0.00021130026,0.000066131346,0.006726179,0.00008890176,0.00038873925,0.0000910924,0.000074382326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011355745,0.00017327549,0.00006187981,0.00033116076,0.0020800615,0.0010639866,0.00016008888,0.00060102873,0.0000040625982],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018745736,0.00010240422,0.055196445,0.0003042248,0.00009245292,0.00059016043,0.052797407,0.00022279425,0.0007207086,0.88938576,0.00033875226,0.00006146136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003110641,0.00022769754,0.29231793,0.00018727468,0.0009048284,0.0002301471,0.5627666,0.0002581104,0.00029048277,0.0016109446,0.13672258,0.0013727942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.301651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5249048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88777477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012916756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067583297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042795276","doi":"","title":"Purposivism, textualism, and originalism in recent cases on charter interpretation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CentAUR (University of Reading)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; TSG101; Hyporeflexia; Subpoena; Demotion; Articular cartilage damage; Diafiltration; Pretext","score_opus":0.026450804224473618,"score_gpt":0.2721568596693859,"score_spread":0.24570605544491228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042795276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98820555,0.000096122014,0.0000075693692,0.0044951835,0.00017843592,0.00022522251,0.000015865568,0.000027537362,0.006748532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977689,0.00043571022,0.00005521969,0.00011264417,0.000020267738,0.0000010632467,0.000009337109,0.000003490849,0.0015933716],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991519,0.00018026648,0.000068184054,0.00017517644,0.0002541335,0.00017035603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965745,0.00010078699,0.00008128244,0.00005894269,0.000043487064,0.000058078116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023400188,0.00006890661,0.00013628825,0.00008083923,0.0007256487,0.00001509316,0.00013949037,0.000030188827,0.00041579767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051241797,0.00007979416,0.000035170186,0.00021884839,0.0002156648,0.00017672076,0.00011399913,0.00012690433,0.000007746995],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035166624,0.00026031284,0.018887177,0.000037529717,0.00007709065,0.00016007888,0.88065034,0.000040085408,0.00042645086,0.036277786,0.010281812,0.052549675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008542333,0.00021025205,0.03079307,0.00005883456,0.000035053406,0.000004327948,0.45512795,0.000121526,0.000044048797,0.0002693184,0.5122265,0.00025484493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011551222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034270035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5019447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049539184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027018938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99503094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042850041","doi":"","title":"A Proposed Transjudicial Approach to s. 15(2)\\nCharter Adjudication","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Reservation; Supreme court; Charter; Adjudication; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Disadvantaged","score_opus":0.024391582733606504,"score_gpt":0.2878392128043245,"score_spread":0.26344763007071803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042850041","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32860047,0.0008270547,0.0013894326,0.055837113,0.0007792663,0.0035709299,0.00002910634,0.0009062102,0.6080604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98927903,0.00003737331,0.0035378132,0.004001875,0.0010680646,0.00006446915,0.000013000385,0.000013274148,0.0019850922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770474,0.00021404939,0.0003034434,0.0004575131,0.0007222593,0.0005979962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990598,0.000040890904,0.00008354077,0.00022252559,0.0001767307,0.00041649086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005249957,0.00020851311,0.00029227923,0.0000404667,0.0012435429,0.0001759205,0.00042170772,0.00017098027,0.0002555119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022638564,0.0001785998,0.00013513329,0.0004520328,0.00026353818,0.0004087003,0.000027699154,0.00026195776,0.000659156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023819153,0.0012791946,0.0024401275,0.000052158506,0.0001782295,0.0000126600935,0.13898443,0.000075235104,0.010812898,0.7400347,0.06553487,0.040357284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017882483,0.00040262984,0.07561401,0.000092483584,0.00011422858,0.0000022316904,0.010999105,0.00005188461,0.0014554299,0.010528338,0.8976866,0.0012648142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006476075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037621623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8321517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026490854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008374895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9789932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042910812","doi":"","title":"Restraining Equality: Human Rights Commissions in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Legislature; Commission","score_opus":0.06841918944618636,"score_gpt":0.3049123135558104,"score_spread":0.23649312410962403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042910812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47116074,6.3750946e-7,0.0000017246784,0.0015819232,0.00015551086,0.0003175615,0.000019671106,0.00019265586,0.52656955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967562,0.0026537124,0.00006145649,0.000051711984,0.000086098036,0.0000026691314,0.000016103075,0.000009125548,0.00036294997],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803096,0.00042824543,0.00017300659,0.00031321292,0.00045236427,0.00060223637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999258,0.00025468518,0.000084778956,0.00017196234,0.00008459323,0.0001460257],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037990604,0.00015683088,0.000242596,0.0015557957,0.0021634216,0.000043994172,0.00045383337,0.000090096524,0.00006590187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013863918,0.00015315296,0.00006963367,0.008821962,0.00020437238,0.00028499187,0.000218044,0.00027343494,0.000022629561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012268526,0.0003022651,0.07709237,0.0001431618,0.0003497431,0.0029417668,0.6978385,0.00022064064,0.00003750829,0.18693498,0.017515264,0.016501136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003720933,0.000016235967,0.006642675,0.00004846025,0.000014378244,2.0819931e-7,0.034851648,0.000024796207,0.000012603571,0.000008394924,0.9577913,0.00021715114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99974906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9402761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002068758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010766655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043236540","doi":"","title":"Review of <i>Canada's Indigenous Constitution</i>. By John Borrows.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Statement (logic); Indigenous rights; Government (linguistics); Traditional knowledge","score_opus":0.021693640946036614,"score_gpt":0.2301069395190524,"score_spread":0.20841329857301577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043236540","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17419372,0.0787745,0.00030638915,0.009342652,0.00089009607,0.0021861116,0.0004933014,0.00017013542,0.7336431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9579962,0.03314437,0.0020272892,0.00090273825,0.00006264121,0.0000010818845,0.000018451112,0.0000069004454,0.0058403607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989385,0.00011858057,0.00014999828,0.00016256113,0.00038690772,0.00024342762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991458,0.00006651212,0.0002461479,0.0001249244,0.00028807286,0.00012856045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002962248,0.000093769,0.00030357056,0.000026451351,0.00072264107,0.0000034008394,0.00039154632,0.00008061191,0.00071150926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014441634,0.00010277746,0.000096999676,0.0003173379,0.0008215117,0.00017414162,0.00009476037,0.0000976713,0.0000108960685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100977995,0.0006202614,0.024941362,0.003374963,0.0005085798,0.000074820025,0.1510477,0.0000023384935,0.00047988573,0.032701243,0.7689595,0.017188312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003685204,0.000057986585,0.011597477,0.00091032346,0.00009593467,7.962915e-7,0.022632694,0.0000011215618,0.00015044768,0.0001366637,0.96381015,0.00023789603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7560445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5603298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78380245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022414673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007925672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77905273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7045331193","doi":"","title":"Administering the Canadian Rule of Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.03726989943488113,"score_gpt":0.30882176601139427,"score_spread":0.27155186657651315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7045331193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2945681,0.0002703981,0.0000014005359,0.008322672,0.00064707565,0.00028025912,0.000019175188,0.000059395774,0.69583154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99357736,0.00001617899,0.00024615822,0.0015835166,0.0007511303,0.00001688974,0.0000014564906,0.000009082066,0.0037982538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987055,0.00013648953,0.00018383024,0.00017521718,0.00035378334,0.00044515263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991427,0.0000897414,0.00007603948,0.00020985339,0.0001925447,0.00028914236],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050043117,0.000107123145,0.00015805729,0.000013059714,0.002757911,0.00014251322,0.00043150023,0.00009494654,0.00080252346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022518962,0.0000742223,0.00007555431,0.00015107461,0.0016733344,0.00019906192,0.00008136469,0.00015659792,0.00043743118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009438458,0.000018866613,0.004536703,0.000012569245,0.00005874808,0.0000050713484,0.025962532,0.0000011632319,0.00029474252,0.9634621,0.0048771016,0.00076095655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012142463,0.00003495731,0.0077949674,0.000025051299,0.000014507769,5.227753e-7,0.0034197846,0.0000023614095,0.00071389874,0.0017753071,0.9859574,0.00013981559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93327016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9810803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027298136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001872668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99854034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067248648","doi":"","title":"Lifeworlds of Administrative Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Lifeworld; State (computer science); Administration (probate law); Indigenous rights","score_opus":0.0700096953384404,"score_gpt":0.36582666681565956,"score_spread":0.2958169714772192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067248648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7945786,0.00077625405,8.188248e-7,0.0002605774,0.00079849607,0.00037199614,0.000008914753,0.00008850437,0.20311584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8157267,0.00085281295,0.00006817582,9.4763396e-7,0.00030455718,0.0000012102366,0.0000470586,0.000014364481,0.1829842],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969845,0.0008893062,0.00018371183,0.0003548862,0.0012011629,0.00038643825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972754,0.00092069566,0.00028497193,0.00013233382,0.0011867298,0.00019983355],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011389257,0.00014794133,0.00040392458,0.0001465052,0.0030537464,0.00006550961,0.0003745775,0.00037119963,0.000087968256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060481275,0.00016834031,0.00012431157,0.0005389691,0.0012287778,0.00018224615,0.00010576816,0.0011047814,0.00002396196],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011344019,0.00028662992,0.014771411,0.0014991896,0.0010269717,0.00022020341,0.9319112,0.00001731035,0.0059102653,0.032008763,0.008467342,0.0027463413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004466995,0.000693812,0.04712534,0.0005896801,0.000078496654,5.4055585e-7,0.74029315,0.000011076175,0.00046251743,0.0004419781,0.20952506,0.00033166716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04963841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027472457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20105772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001971632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037822768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99824417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067547708","doi":"","title":"&lt;i&gt;Bissonnette&lt;/i&gt;: Another Step Forward, After the Harper Decade of Regression in Sentencing","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Pessimism; Charter; Supreme court; Relation (database); Economic Justice; Sentence; Life imprisonment","score_opus":0.01715910415535603,"score_gpt":0.2730890884724468,"score_spread":0.25592998431709074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067547708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9679772,0.005736374,0.0000173107,0.010173348,0.00061576354,0.0008212105,0.000043330532,0.0000919947,0.014523455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904129,0.00016372128,0.00034331286,0.001637699,0.00030632172,0.00026094093,0.0000039394363,0.000028724948,0.0068424772],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966341,0.00076403184,0.0004424201,0.0004249818,0.0010935349,0.0006408976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989127,0.00026775833,0.00022559377,0.00034627295,0.00012039916,0.000127259],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001290991,0.00023899195,0.00036623597,0.000054070628,0.0015281801,0.00008446887,0.0006349966,0.00012072413,0.0022770786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037222868,0.00016110472,0.00020494156,0.0005350225,0.00049214845,0.00033889673,0.0004540157,0.00048192797,0.00007489044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001654858,0.0013245686,0.24290961,0.00032921231,0.0009317424,0.00025953224,0.3176411,0.002255821,0.08342185,0.13154545,0.20008144,0.017644808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007673143,0.000060424343,0.038933326,0.00011447758,0.00004842261,0.0000024152823,0.0143653145,0.00010688989,0.00048094481,0.00047493388,0.944279,0.00036649458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009903272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04529304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7441976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000432517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000084403284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067615404","doi":"","title":"Mike Peerless on Carriage","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carriage; Power (physics); Isolation (microbiology)","score_opus":0.03773232448395241,"score_gpt":0.3004084426198087,"score_spread":0.2626761181358563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067615404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5665183,0.0007865409,0.00001541792,0.066954434,0.0010672822,0.0006936305,0.000046163404,0.00057504274,0.3633432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98735017,0.000073654795,0.00023155515,0.006315766,0.0014778469,0.00003097715,0.00000553549,0.00001759983,0.0044968817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805105,0.00021792491,0.00020587613,0.00037642499,0.0006676571,0.00048109077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901253,0.00014712744,0.00007586615,0.00016190302,0.00011577524,0.0004867953],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027573825,0.00018424752,0.0002648111,0.000011060433,0.0011917085,0.00018366716,0.00042222693,0.00013109394,0.0010573558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007203171,0.00015460787,0.00013986138,0.0002538997,0.00034106232,0.0002494187,0.00010220693,0.00033713793,0.0020533057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013463179,0.00018130668,0.013626472,0.000090171015,0.000225891,0.00012035413,0.10257926,0.00010664704,0.0019311811,0.7111379,0.16550444,0.0043617357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042461586,0.00007428584,0.004758831,0.00002556295,0.000021980157,1.9769801e-7,0.008640344,0.000009736889,0.0004557462,0.00045069674,0.9848251,0.00031292732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0143799735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008813001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8193206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018958897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056194927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070669946","doi":"","title":"Putting the Train of Environmental Governance Back on Track: Nova Scotia's Experiment in Using Legislation to Strengthen Environmental Governance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Nova scotia; Corporate governance; Environmental governance; Prosperity; Environmental policy; Sustainable development","score_opus":0.026861468226415684,"score_gpt":0.26950803780168553,"score_spread":0.24264656957526984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070669946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99101514,0.0005282206,0.0000058656333,0.002237285,0.0002151339,0.0009207534,0.000059815164,0.000015955864,0.005001864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971853,0.00009263208,0.0013503006,0.0003495701,0.000209968,0.000026876864,0.0000037002947,0.00001860368,0.0007630717],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775285,0.00021743317,0.00040584247,0.00038351316,0.00077242294,0.00046797126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992157,0.00015076285,0.00026877667,0.0002256293,0.000008295674,0.00013082931],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037570193,0.00022449974,0.00025237846,0.000011054832,0.00039899038,0.00008947616,0.00037136383,0.00009546443,0.0023223115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009439537,0.00017754821,0.00010081891,0.00012795342,0.0004088789,0.0005479274,0.00011656121,0.0002356743,0.00053097727],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019933606,0.0031212228,0.15995724,0.00007347855,0.000330637,0.000022221922,0.24788861,0.012807369,0.35119268,0.054522872,0.004936147,0.16494817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017672393,0.00022964955,0.8966647,0.00034976468,0.000030145051,0.0000014720075,0.03671003,0.0008983153,0.015243208,0.0002305308,0.047028635,0.0008463305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039260633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011552954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73670745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011171396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022768707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071098791","doi":"","title":"The rules of the Law society of Upper Canada, passed in convocation, Easter term, 52 Victoria, and approved by the visitors of the society.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Work (physics); Action (physics); Liability","score_opus":0.0043960915419094405,"score_gpt":0.17985006379490337,"score_spread":0.17545397225299392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071098791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7471889,0.00007910678,0.0000057225884,0.24777491,0.00022543714,0.0004541731,0.000043212844,0.000014497498,0.004214003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892215,0.00016640892,0.000067874935,0.00036117976,0.000053384105,0.0000011366055,0.0000018208316,0.0000067050296,0.010119999],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860543,0.00045934424,0.00015270773,0.00015974481,0.00040762266,0.00021513588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987971,0.00053385727,0.00027028448,0.00025781887,0.00009757546,0.000043332086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020866992,0.00012203418,0.00018927264,0.0000047584217,0.0010753422,0.000035705234,0.00072684843,0.000097768585,0.00001222144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051829356,0.00006032487,0.00019897668,0.0002611843,0.0016612174,0.00031995092,0.0003413335,0.00017745874,2.251271e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003809938,0.00006788122,0.36251968,0.000085210944,0.0002925716,1.1030685e-7,0.08705679,0.000014879126,0.00024194157,0.064055145,0.48542356,0.00020411135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053170905,0.000017764673,0.3620071,0.000059101603,0.00006185456,1.812676e-8,0.0896906,0.000027937476,0.0020580858,0.0003668354,0.5450117,0.00016724847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6232376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1262726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.496965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001133292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024312513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88967067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071106133","doi":"","title":"Prospectus and constitution together with some remarks on the present system of land transfer in Ontario and the Torrens' system of registration of title together with suggestions for the amendment of the present law of descent ...","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Prospectus; Amendment; Land registration; Legislation; Product (mathematics); Transfer (computing); Constitutional law","score_opus":0.01002880862855427,"score_gpt":0.19217285943441442,"score_spread":0.18214405080586016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071106133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93262357,0.00012475782,0.00024257043,0.028949447,0.000059142683,0.0025312935,0.00003565219,0.000013965921,0.03541961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981308,0.000038517395,0.000053908527,0.0000052617906,0.000009791844,0.0000038606254,6.329994e-7,0.0000023877492,0.001754857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938214,0.00018194801,0.00009753363,0.00007967005,0.00019233204,0.00006640538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994411,0.00024499177,0.00012101299,0.000119336924,0.000059375183,0.000014174591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017637733,0.00005871142,0.00014790287,0.000012164689,0.00014397243,0.0000075634807,0.000108182896,0.00003316908,0.0000074698014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010933649,0.000024561215,0.000030557676,0.00007591928,0.00094462617,0.00008609147,0.00002670824,0.000058841095,5.4720694e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000511842,0.000059771697,0.03292048,0.00024307241,0.00012172719,2.8671894e-7,0.017296009,0.00026527548,0.000022301305,0.94770527,0.0008188906,0.000035099303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016024385,0.002699037,0.4071017,0.007985787,0.0019859078,0.0000024449953,0.33909476,0.0006769296,0.043733466,0.0012707956,0.1784129,0.0010119064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13693108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040538922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94643444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006624675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007230278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97696877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071537452","doi":"","title":"Syntactic, Semantic, and Stylistic Variation in Old English Periphrastic Passives","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Participle; Resultative; Old English; Subject (documents); Scholarship; Agency (philosophy); Point (geometry); Embarrassment","score_opus":0.015889462446644496,"score_gpt":0.2426102533024937,"score_spread":0.2267207908558492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071537452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915679,0.000809281,0.0001703937,0.0019347321,0.0002713455,0.00023182905,0.000045646273,0.00011431456,0.004854572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99859405,0.00017783444,0.0005508091,0.000012374547,0.00007334065,6.473474e-7,0.0000035574296,0.000007673066,0.0005797328],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876994,0.0002889898,0.00010335164,0.00027263846,0.00031208177,0.0002529765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992481,0.00030211013,0.00006665015,0.00011914659,0.00015500585,0.000109020744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005827974,0.000118902375,0.00023987597,0.00015302518,0.0008829269,0.00011433539,0.0002063494,0.00013102527,0.00006835278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078226713,0.00013386254,0.0000772695,0.00044942656,0.00040810904,0.0006709759,0.00014895885,0.00043163044,0.00002019423],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051981988,0.00007457753,0.120918654,0.00025930023,0.00017947084,0.00013574157,0.83676064,0.000042258358,0.00036971638,0.038830593,0.00022789105,0.002149205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005330297,0.00004980994,0.7481601,0.00025359113,0.00020560711,0.0000013516949,0.23281342,0.0010315703,0.0000040295204,0.0005366954,0.016103953,0.00030680472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060024885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062440992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6272415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002085189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007744753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9074007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071684521","doi":"","title":"A Time and Manner to Die: a Study of Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Autonomy; Supreme court; Constitution; Natural (archaeology); Right to die; Bodily integrity; Human rights","score_opus":0.00891010096851918,"score_gpt":0.23550560469230017,"score_spread":0.22659550372378098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071684521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9741562,0.000040758056,1.2295962e-7,0.019126382,0.00013639696,0.0005473311,0.000013963339,0.000024981058,0.0059538377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92763686,0.00020968466,0.00009892226,0.00006581105,0.00004853178,0.0000026757477,0.000025926114,0.0000146794455,0.07189689],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980017,0.00028391086,0.00018177237,0.00037713195,0.0008336171,0.0003218836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934053,0.00014352801,0.00013964625,0.00011610811,0.00005424132,0.00020595141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013857121,0.00018743458,0.0004270224,0.00017388232,0.0002494159,0.000035521854,0.00046411902,0.00020677451,0.0002627524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001515935,0.00019313727,0.00003047345,0.0005979253,0.00011852977,0.0004339863,0.00017952437,0.0003031936,0.0000052863634],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006520654,0.00047691318,0.370364,0.0002495244,0.00021208345,0.0011973106,0.5151442,0.000021135631,0.000002752194,0.00060706417,0.10964639,0.0014265097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078655087,0.00009455702,0.4510659,0.00047900248,0.000033025495,1.7944288e-8,0.49616292,0.0000074329564,0.000013166329,0.0000136499175,0.05093222,0.0004115536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9942265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99813163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08070189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073017855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011820978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7875909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7073633302","doi":"","title":"The most dangerous branch how the Supreme Court of Canada has undermined our law and our democracy","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Democracy; Politics; Orthodoxy; Objectivity (philosophy); State (computer science); Rule of law","score_opus":0.038953201269414504,"score_gpt":0.27791095578489444,"score_spread":0.23895775451547993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7073633302","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18863444,0.001430096,0.000041529354,0.6904448,0.00081129436,0.00085620955,0.000017282322,0.00006015368,0.117704175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841621,0.00012408703,0.00007902372,0.0009784935,0.00009212411,0.000009358667,5.043895e-7,0.000006387331,0.014547951],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985673,0.00026636783,0.00014035823,0.0001521603,0.0004905504,0.00038328127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918973,0.0003000251,0.00008851763,0.00014868425,0.00017945953,0.00009355986],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005689717,0.00012138379,0.0001638368,0.0000042766733,0.0036505433,0.00019442567,0.0002580409,0.00005323739,0.000009073927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063315645,0.00005829354,0.00003629099,0.00016308109,0.0003286718,0.000117076575,0.000049380957,0.00011775811,0.0000012701169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022456325,0.000063862964,0.014576491,0.000029854846,0.00032562006,0.000009695963,0.03627005,0.00001820994,0.0006356025,0.4010761,0.5438799,0.0030921265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043446058,0.000026628379,0.008708935,0.0000115468765,0.000044146735,0.0000032170221,0.24336036,0.000015580457,0.0006901548,0.0030581607,0.7433883,0.00025851623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8080232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98723817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79552764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015455706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034748012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7093795733","doi":"","title":"9783035261547.pdf","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; French; Limiting; Human rights","score_opus":0.0343187840349348,"score_gpt":0.3013676023343425,"score_spread":0.2670488182994077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7093795733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035658115,0.000038787468,0.00012367291,0.076873355,0.0035105858,0.0017056477,2.9172268e-8,0.00018699677,0.9172043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015175768,0.0013557434,0.0009946752,0.0033125663,0.004718056,0.00022375917,0.00016123605,0.00021138489,0.9738468],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950548,0.000921208,0.00075415155,0.0009974106,0.0013010293,0.0009714312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973548,0.0007322061,0.00079910574,0.0005653066,0.00017417572,0.00037437447],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006659684,0.00081015425,0.00088207977,0.00006129918,0.0030663158,0.00077234354,0.0017921567,0.00047982938,0.9646176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077629025,0.0005949561,0.00050275074,0.0010287446,0.0021330512,0.0005809539,0.0005661936,0.0009020788,0.9903149],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017400538,0.00007507171,0.0005908814,0.000055422555,0.0004897347,0.000010267749,0.010892247,0.000007420082,0.00003853512,0.032897983,0.0019951274,0.9529299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004181371,0.00006507913,0.005135274,0.00013941067,0.00036084314,0.0000031335214,0.0040104287,0.00007269495,0.000012942803,0.0014168472,0.9875762,0.0007890273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0083174985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062952144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98558104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094201067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035603403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7094102973","doi":"","title":"Review of &lt;i&gt;Canada's Indigenous Constitution&lt;/i&gt;. By John Borrows.","year":2011,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Insecta mundi","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Statement (logic); Indigenous rights; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.03044690901893472,"score_gpt":0.2654684075772588,"score_spread":0.2350214985583241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7094102973","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10942714,0.61770797,0.000024941179,0.0020073478,0.003984338,0.0031360034,0.0008002786,0.0001548655,0.26275712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8071344,0.18876278,0.00015163847,0.0017659847,0.00030170643,0.00009010696,0.00004055376,0.00003079024,0.0017220498],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934378,0.0008593134,0.0016737264,0.00087344134,0.0016685631,0.0014871455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99612224,0.00035942366,0.0012626455,0.00068355195,0.0009894773,0.0005826755],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013962236,0.0007468824,0.0014590885,0.000082088496,0.00256038,0.000091215225,0.0014618445,0.00045851766,0.0034244028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015756489,0.0006703314,0.0004649569,0.0012467948,0.0035348646,0.00054149935,0.00039602965,0.00056238036,0.0001855848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018307513,0.0019917088,0.021782119,0.01246076,0.0022968224,0.00019588704,0.20854257,0.0000020476537,0.0091458205,0.050868966,0.67443246,0.018097756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005928113,0.00024114351,0.012649918,0.004512319,0.00042153455,0.000011085227,0.00051957404,0.0000025475917,0.00025892523,0.00012694052,0.9796343,0.0010288997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91449606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91287374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69770724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001608212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032790778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095338573","doi":"","title":"Article Taking Account of Religion in Canada: The Debates over Gay and","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Economic Justice; Lesbian; Theme (computing)","score_opus":0.024578531780765803,"score_gpt":0.28743982790250805,"score_spread":0.26286129612174225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095338573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9858917,0.00025102464,0.0000030669833,0.008961412,0.000045960925,0.00008415063,8.1942585e-7,0.000006521358,0.0047553605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99913937,0.0002721944,0.000019615327,0.00018571483,0.00002623013,0.0000038731687,2.4490394e-8,0.0000015589717,0.0003513946],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945825,0.00004618198,0.000097273325,0.00007170278,0.00017848973,0.00014812633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995896,0.00026056144,0.000048574464,0.0000427338,0.000034696364,0.00002381096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020717306,0.000038009133,0.00006819331,0.00000573351,0.00015815448,0.00001271068,0.0000701635,0.000017330402,0.0000832882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029642644,0.000016034968,0.000010591018,0.00008160271,0.000143749,0.0001069848,0.000037197522,0.000024440616,0.0000017692905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007916167,0.000008972465,0.9518173,0.0000041863623,0.000012780754,0.0000014294255,0.013368284,0.0000026226767,0.0030877648,0.018223785,0.0043155523,0.009149458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017389361,0.0000046674813,0.9798591,0.0000256567,0.0000036848296,9.62445e-8,0.008461057,0.000015651742,0.001427508,0.0006957081,0.009270628,0.00006235532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99234486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028041845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002675403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010444169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12164124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095673253","doi":"","title":"FUTURES: TRANSFORMING THE DELIVERY OF LEGAL SERVICES IN CANADA","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Permission; Legal service; Legislation; Legal research; Futures contract; Confidentiality","score_opus":0.010272274171671533,"score_gpt":0.24399726182205897,"score_spread":0.23372498765038743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095673253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9439308,0.00017424063,0.0000042580664,0.0049020387,0.00014656702,0.00012592501,0.0000015762332,0.000010103543,0.050704487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99891466,0.00008268437,0.000042211937,0.00046083998,0.000096635704,0.000005189869,3.9216948e-7,0.0000020962784,0.00039528962],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919796,0.000096899385,0.0001372161,0.000079691374,0.0002932617,0.00019494457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996521,0.00017660178,0.000034794244,0.000054579697,0.00004918099,0.000032736756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029436097,0.000057597477,0.000110196655,0.000008433896,0.00037083408,0.000017870863,0.000224203,0.000025691883,0.000073683324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024225974,0.000032015054,0.000030060346,0.00012810188,0.000089860005,0.00013738514,0.00001828499,0.00007125446,0.0000016880208],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053169555,0.00007301596,0.17098247,0.00023092356,0.00014454368,0.0000076075958,0.49353597,0.00046137412,0.0010537104,0.20560144,0.0045217443,0.123334035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032911022,0.000016762175,0.111758746,0.000044438628,0.000016221362,2.3787649e-7,0.50409544,0.00025994916,0.0007276272,0.00023923423,0.38230756,0.00020465133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99913925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37778583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001984041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021675992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28521934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095740046","doi":"","title":"Co-counsel to Her Majesty in Right Of Newfoundland and Labrador","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Population; Government (linguistics); Period (music)","score_opus":0.0253128589518021,"score_gpt":0.3087215900289601,"score_spread":0.283408731077158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095740046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9354594,0.00014230028,0.0000061653277,0.0025397763,0.000051109168,0.00018894068,0.0000024377066,0.000022582104,0.061587296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877549,0.00024433548,0.0005140026,0.0002411965,0.000057384677,0.000006751858,4.641666e-7,0.000003089639,0.011177868],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927455,0.00005450721,0.0001284496,0.00013009294,0.00022379177,0.00018858089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969846,0.00008808647,0.000027099182,0.000051757954,0.000053646123,0.00008095085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018378648,0.00006687111,0.00015253383,0.000024684585,0.00027874438,0.0000139772455,0.00008195449,0.000050650233,0.00031713696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008642747,0.00004652936,0.000020928976,0.00017410154,0.00029455166,0.00011496003,0.000016803373,0.00005039873,0.00003643479],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025121508,0.00008701503,0.83351445,0.000013270513,0.0000228089,0.000017361188,0.14466967,0.0000031261595,0.00044541387,0.008115405,0.011522955,0.0015634052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003765125,0.000032282136,0.8662491,0.000011687334,0.0000036318554,0.0000011921076,0.005587451,0.000002962792,0.00011643134,0.00022780761,0.12725551,0.00013544643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11340679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17563455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13908222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008680899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026026471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8924971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095881176","doi":"","title":"1 Canada Opposes The United Nations ’ Declaration Of 2007 Recognizing The Rights Of Indigenous Peoples: Is Canada’s Strident Opposition An Anomaly Or A Symptom Of A Troubling Transformational Shift In Canadian Values?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Indigenous; Human rights; Declaration; Globalization; Indigenous rights; General assembly; Islam","score_opus":0.06550172098162407,"score_gpt":0.30350571756649564,"score_spread":0.23800399658487156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095881176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.989165,0.000073991425,0.000027383841,0.007634066,0.00010878288,0.00061761885,0.00027238205,0.000005240477,0.002095497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994163,0.000040880554,0.00008814958,0.00023069688,0.00003793032,0.000018453165,0.000065591674,0.0000037938112,0.000098237826],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998106,0.00030138931,0.0004379057,0.00010824173,0.00076488854,0.00028158925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984803,0.00040214683,0.00022205479,0.00009638189,0.00062559574,0.0001735251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000832259,0.000101557554,0.00017966864,0.00024226667,0.00085069373,0.00003582512,0.0002857203,0.00006117836,0.000063214924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032202803,0.000058550486,0.000031715113,0.0011456492,0.00014829173,0.00034987816,0.000010628688,0.00009537409,1.503216e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006844684,0.00009835965,0.024341581,0.00005638127,0.00019710907,0.0000045136876,0.9511893,0.0031582692,0.000042726446,0.015534302,0.0049862424,0.00032275953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012176647,0.00019326173,0.26682448,0.00020405822,0.00015057698,0.0000031856719,0.70844805,0.002039741,0.0015654392,0.00045696343,0.018461473,0.0004350652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99999654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24274124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015559477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019080143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9864808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096320376","doi":"","title":"Inclusion, Voice, and Process-Based","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Framing (construction); Social rights; Charter; Democracy; Fundamental rights; Human rights","score_opus":0.020899298453024046,"score_gpt":0.32945860799561044,"score_spread":0.30855930954258637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096320376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78981,0.0003039176,0.00024581465,0.082517564,0.00013758718,0.0003124539,0.0000033256422,0.00024316259,0.12642619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918568,0.00006202503,0.00024810788,0.0005323019,0.000097037584,0.00001149221,1.6403708e-7,0.0000029137534,0.0071891267],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933505,0.000043398522,0.00007307316,0.0001281119,0.00024510597,0.00017526488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959254,0.00014963848,0.000026767388,0.00004226385,0.00010918691,0.00007960962],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022573741,0.000056962203,0.00007334298,0.0000115111525,0.00130986,0.000022235354,0.00009673454,0.000044551503,0.0003118333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040096155,0.000027588138,0.000017759341,0.00009307957,0.00032323282,0.00014905013,0.00012580345,0.000023691993,0.00007037655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086393884,0.0002725173,0.404976,0.00010432186,0.000096205295,0.000011528684,0.22357342,0.0000024073995,0.007613421,0.08811383,0.040360816,0.23478912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012531827,0.000067198656,0.07724545,0.000083701314,0.000020967078,2.2754965e-7,0.011440613,0.000018553981,0.0024625405,0.011636976,0.89530736,0.00046321983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015426005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033192767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85494655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054822525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003933416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096397332","doi":"","title":"SHOULD THE CHRA MIRROR THE CHARTER?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Human rights; Inequality; Common ground; Civil rights","score_opus":0.07566578135411474,"score_gpt":0.34813659580989936,"score_spread":0.27247081445578464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096397332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13927549,0.00026490944,0.000055010212,0.38970965,0.0006813714,0.00050888123,0.0000011825434,0.00018802982,0.46931547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788431,0.00005103743,0.00005491961,0.0037061644,0.00037644347,0.000032186334,2.4574229e-7,0.0000040695045,0.01693185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989368,0.0002365766,0.00009645947,0.00011786269,0.00034546206,0.00026685587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994231,0.00027689294,0.00003738217,0.0001582745,0.000059125174,0.00004525066],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008416714,0.00007726235,0.000088130306,0.000004191537,0.0020307673,0.000116464515,0.0004279016,0.000047166333,0.0005140884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032333072,0.00002844034,0.00007278389,0.00011677033,0.00053377525,0.00008496985,0.00006936055,0.00012481723,0.00041981216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008059842,0.00005418024,0.0075599323,0.000008441996,0.00010067957,6.5703523e-7,0.24679312,0.0000013372029,0.0004515809,0.5785902,0.12798916,0.038442634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007120449,0.00001063922,0.033563998,0.0000032676255,0.000010419746,1.3263745e-7,0.020781254,0.000037157733,0.000052574218,0.0008768946,0.94451386,0.00007862057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014179959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016062822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8395676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040565843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012728563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096534072","doi":"","title":"The Attorney General for Ontario, the Attorney General for New Brunswick, the Attorney General of British Columbia, the Attorney General for Alberta,","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Power of attorney; Confidentiality; Defense attorney; Liability; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.035949213124430765,"score_gpt":0.29291918367504605,"score_spread":0.25696997055061527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096534072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9242168,0.003292644,0.0013061914,0.03632528,0.0057303184,0.012772129,0.0004983951,0.000260919,0.015597344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18427446,0.0013824414,0.007072907,0.0073351967,0.017369594,0.0028351392,0.00023666241,0.00026065393,0.7792329],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911944,0.0008477126,0.0017707519,0.0015326705,0.0016398238,0.0030146216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99202913,0.0036128368,0.0009821696,0.0013872249,0.001336385,0.0006522616],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034446793,0.00094187394,0.0013030939,0.000043432694,0.0103210695,0.0021225659,0.003669116,0.00066494267,0.0006988345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001454965,0.0006113224,0.0019406312,0.00066088606,0.0025965306,0.0005894395,0.00062193477,0.00074482016,0.00003660404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036699668,0.00025420732,0.04780383,0.000053613232,0.0012631789,0.0000037025281,0.016224364,0.0004781282,0.00044210406,0.057055667,0.8654434,0.010610789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002826989,0.00035951697,0.068825625,0.00004260402,0.00048241435,0.000018677723,0.0042303298,0.0019380543,0.00010093515,0.001970492,0.9181845,0.0010198674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9531569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99530995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7636356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013809506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022423004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096717024","doi":"","title":"REVIEW","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Harassment; Charter; Racism; Sexual orientation; Obligation; Ethnic group; Citizenship","score_opus":0.06275382254897376,"score_gpt":0.3701225108715663,"score_spread":0.3073686883225925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096717024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016000371,0.023348697,0.000067847504,0.19157578,0.00020569899,0.00026061054,0.0000010625122,0.00018169743,0.78275853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45948896,0.28716522,0.0008922349,0.013777945,0.0005802953,0.00004784951,2.9304883e-7,0.000007579185,0.23803961],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955666,0.000053468266,0.00006120845,0.00007021255,0.00012376487,0.00013468883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997579,0.00007826865,0.00001683636,0.00004792235,0.00005229017,0.000046789166],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022789484,0.000032518798,0.000067480374,0.0000028534012,0.00023508072,0.000007285915,0.000089071305,0.000017425968,0.0028724263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004748941,0.000014120434,0.000035145105,0.000062638035,0.00013379935,0.00009617273,0.000022229033,0.000013355061,0.0010389395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.089254e-7,0.000011472587,0.0023158141,0.00004561252,0.000014561721,7.336068e-7,0.0020348977,1.9911959e-9,0.00017146178,0.1087512,0.7360952,0.15055837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003560212,0.000002501277,0.0011634168,0.00020063794,0.0000036275862,4.0524373e-8,0.0002663808,8.436083e-9,0.000020524672,0.00031104469,0.9979535,0.000042733715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001311834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009995922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.544719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005723348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000124708395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096719219","doi":"","title":"IV. Membership of Council 5 V. Parliamentary Authority and Procedures 6 VI. Meetings of Council 7","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Constitution; Power (physics); Teaching staff; Social work; Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.09302011390302259,"score_gpt":0.31337514665548594,"score_spread":0.22035503275246335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096719219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8425119,0.0010654728,0.000007977318,0.0014767073,0.0001259439,0.00031062006,0.000008149747,0.000055419114,0.15443781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964651,0.00026509908,0.0010337719,0.00016277122,0.00010800128,0.000005370828,6.7552156e-7,0.000005977714,0.001953256],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997178,0.000075721626,0.00036271778,0.00022082045,0.001814679,0.0003480453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795234,0.00036285282,0.0001530396,0.00008741336,0.0013177102,0.00012666649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045690746,0.00013450364,0.00029702336,0.000013348481,0.0003708444,0.000021161546,0.000167941,0.00011291631,0.00022360777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024870888,0.000101911035,0.00006735673,0.000205345,0.0009243342,0.00018415453,0.00007421892,0.00010310771,0.000003166281],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035785406,0.00046725958,0.27991438,0.00087118964,0.00040300476,0.000009043417,0.5910517,0.0000043302466,0.011114652,0.04753599,0.06289155,0.0053790375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019356045,0.00034829252,0.2694847,0.00030940524,0.0002540799,0.000002746275,0.49562347,0.000024289086,0.017249657,0.004004961,0.20980842,0.0009543737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11891977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19060196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15395318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009399251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006577776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8869474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096919844","doi":"","title":"Protecting Whose Security?: Anti-Terrorism Legislation and the Criminalization of Dissent","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Criminalization; Dissent; Politics; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Terrorism; Social movement","score_opus":0.02040571565901589,"score_gpt":0.3007463978456916,"score_spread":0.28034068218667574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096919844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9679625,0.0002768383,0.00048427598,0.005357965,0.00009156668,0.000572294,6.042294e-7,0.000040850744,0.025213119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988809,0.00004684298,0.00012081484,0.000018661487,0.00014287025,0.000016165946,0.0000014046839,0.0000026132025,0.00076970976],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999228,0.00019577665,0.00015103712,0.00009425217,0.00021856878,0.00011236803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995984,0.0001403948,0.00010327318,0.000044517772,0.0000988906,0.000014542474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056231115,0.000055157183,0.000103035665,0.000011955781,0.0007120682,0.00004719243,0.000053858108,0.000037738737,0.000022221737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002758779,0.000031871943,0.000030784297,0.00011389966,0.00040119098,0.00016495436,0.000029436007,0.000056286077,0.0000013443403],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047588375,0.00011259353,0.06840994,0.00008815544,0.000046048066,0.0000011766537,0.5373075,0.00009613485,0.0017269731,0.38603872,0.0013484366,0.0047767432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003255583,0.00008103377,0.4965968,0.00018637125,0.00020476132,0.0000022297088,0.41520888,0.0037755717,0.006402192,0.047365457,0.02622354,0.00069756404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048947267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005986488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42818686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029786257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008786973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9573859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097520795","doi":"","title":"Crime and the Insanity Defense,","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insanity; Plea; Commission; Criminal law; Governor; Value (mathematics); Expansive; Pleasure; Convict","score_opus":0.039396452483419234,"score_gpt":0.3096013881162225,"score_spread":0.2702049356328033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097520795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21168356,0.00039455696,0.000055935467,0.042303696,0.00014177119,0.0002318086,0.0000013731716,0.00009332503,0.745094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98258865,0.0003336853,0.00009453864,0.00047511616,0.00010812449,0.000007728412,2.9130947e-8,0.0000016572599,0.016390499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994324,0.00014019555,0.000058591355,0.00008115504,0.00014510441,0.00014259077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941015,0.0004257182,0.000019365401,0.000052214225,0.00005023736,0.000042286196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003987057,0.00004331018,0.00007143037,0.000003765557,0.0007589912,0.00003699895,0.00009028168,0.000028645894,0.00029227298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064367935,0.000014791105,0.00002729999,0.000046880024,0.001051237,0.00009811523,0.000058082645,0.000029406943,0.000094115516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001684142,0.000008188973,0.00647082,0.0000013291613,0.000021400521,4.2561243e-7,0.022712475,7.7052835e-9,0.000087355336,0.94833547,0.009977749,0.012367927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018242613,0.000017608603,0.23560928,0.000014613005,0.000029184537,6.2318054e-7,0.02352038,0.0000013636412,0.0002008753,0.028728155,0.70982957,0.00022408263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031185152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91960734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003387242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011331559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99691767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097988389","doi":"","title":"Title of Thesis: The Inherent Right of the Haudenosaunee to Criminal Justice Jurisdiction in Canada: A Preliminary Inquiry","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Legislation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.04189791110701258,"score_gpt":0.29971143975288983,"score_spread":0.25781352864587725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097988389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90672725,0.00023210474,0.00003127787,0.018707817,0.000728121,0.00041386046,0.00000716234,0.000010784295,0.07314159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99709773,0.000029658446,0.000025710602,0.00011238549,0.00006809051,0.000012003439,4.7224347e-8,0.000001943534,0.0026524004],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936855,0.00009210406,0.00012080992,0.00006506307,0.0002495517,0.00010393664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996168,0.00016816359,0.00005054915,0.00008776249,0.00005579657,0.000020925549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016821656,0.00004157947,0.00007305743,0.000008707543,0.000118566095,0.0000031680142,0.00018534223,0.000022312748,0.00040067252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017161317,0.000015663732,0.000025704754,0.00011011023,0.00014646772,0.000031894382,0.00005941317,0.000035644818,0.00001207878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017910606,0.0002619977,0.032839514,0.00022823886,0.00016136884,0.0000050338326,0.34880412,0.000048473834,0.0035673098,0.08824813,0.475461,0.050195705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002570354,0.00007471215,0.74969757,0.00018415503,0.000174951,4.769692e-7,0.11431255,0.000011368135,0.006156662,0.00039043342,0.12856765,0.00017241258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6679064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8505198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7168581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025323583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022066092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43870834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102759388","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0052","title":"Transforming spousal support from the ground up: Carol Rogerson and the development of the spousal support advisory guidelines","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Negotiation; Economic Justice; Work (physics); Exaggeration; Set (abstract data type); Advisory committee","score_opus":0.0265818875826978,"score_gpt":0.27782091103299517,"score_spread":0.25123902345029736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102759388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9192892,0.0021141365,0.0003059482,0.01756651,0.0010333218,0.000589739,0.00003266189,0.00002183902,0.059046656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957352,0.00057126593,0.0006941776,0.00021712888,0.00012159569,2.5879837e-7,0.000001367174,0.0000034464708,0.0026555147],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986554,0.00023979993,0.00028988972,0.00012249136,0.00047276195,0.00021965975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907404,0.00024998552,0.00022754929,0.000106411186,0.00028314095,0.000058874],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011670323,0.00011548512,0.00024576197,0.0000071008453,0.003188158,0.00004339571,0.00061541266,0.0000752487,0.0003369162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009032468,0.000062131556,0.00017462698,0.00004983267,0.0011878704,0.00034626326,0.00013942654,0.00018215974,8.5381004e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073304353,0.00008555739,0.023908693,0.00003340216,0.0011333252,0.000012385848,0.87618333,0.000016717717,0.0004418122,0.041344397,0.015553751,0.040553566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020178985,0.000026763937,0.037153203,0.00009263975,0.00026168922,0.0000039204247,0.4741085,0.000011162585,0.0001995612,0.00035188437,0.4856249,0.00014787425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17515185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5089234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47007117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035229386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033637142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104451281","doi":"10.1093/9780198922469.003.0001","title":"Looking for Common Ground","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Charter; Indigenous rights; Common law; Individualism; Multiculturalism; Variety (cybernetics)","score_opus":0.0507397096041196,"score_gpt":0.3379790812979454,"score_spread":0.2872393716938258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104451281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000013681702,0.0008232946,0.00008608823,0.003239974,0.00064605905,0.00075125846,0.000025503197,0.00014772346,0.9942664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023138174,0.00043337364,0.0005705393,0.0005018952,0.0006440815,0.00003410205,0.000019151756,0.000014795727,0.99546826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989184,0.000018221415,0.00021431036,0.00026608567,0.00030311782,0.0002798524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910516,0.0004399742,0.00011170973,0.00011922969,0.00016290767,0.000061033392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025757856,0.00020624347,0.00035862176,0.000034538247,0.0011548745,0.000110429944,0.00026861747,0.0003413867,0.000685872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000109123495,0.00016767408,0.00023653157,0.000020869451,0.00030080546,0.00008222025,0.000110858564,0.00018522187,0.00006514562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004020379,0.0000035875375,0.00002089093,0.000034501405,0.00008967608,8.9925317e-7,0.0022518411,1.233397e-7,5.7528985e-7,0.93073565,0.054301064,0.012557163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010369311,0.000012537615,0.000038351114,0.00009577479,0.00006659738,4.7104702e-8,0.00096843566,0.0000017872477,0.0000016486068,0.043748517,0.95474285,0.00021977878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057592853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02833865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90044177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036891727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007640405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9893916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7105719249","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5745662","title":"Pepa v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration): There's Only one Reasonable Interpretation…Yet Again","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of Fredericton","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Supreme court; Statutory law; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.012135033421399755,"score_gpt":0.26497422035880575,"score_spread":0.252839186937406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7105719249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67130166,0.12957792,0.003203421,0.100769594,0.006143942,0.0037196602,0.00031086407,0.00019392079,0.08477903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.866991,0.08424142,0.0001796218,0.0005366273,0.0008090382,0.000048301576,0.000034179622,0.000033459182,0.047126386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98973364,0.001524719,0.001267321,0.0010299588,0.0017710617,0.0046732877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99608344,0.00089449616,0.001188648,0.00036092105,0.0010410622,0.00043145914],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005009705,0.0008521004,0.0011447042,0.0001436406,0.004033001,0.00085595757,0.0012515807,0.00058896554,0.00024654827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012875911,0.00078495475,0.00040047278,0.0005693084,0.00063141173,0.00036059093,0.00064419955,0.007509942,0.000016236918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00091113686,0.0004099268,0.022334328,0.0005647277,0.012759694,0.000049285325,0.09022232,0.0007056669,0.00008322735,0.64429295,0.016231183,0.21143556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024759343,0.00057590666,0.018854262,0.0024487474,0.0015526393,0.00016948367,0.29857224,0.0012783192,0.00004303285,0.64578664,0.025358208,0.002884582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83363575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99043834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20855097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01583651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046057533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7110669277","doi":"","title":"I Believe in the Holy Catholic Church","year":2020,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - St. Norbert College (St. Norbert College)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SAINT; Protestantism; Sacred theology; Sister; Catholic theology; Systematic theology; Editorial board; Christianity","score_opus":0.03816959391634666,"score_gpt":0.2872816244421194,"score_spread":0.24911203052577274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7110669277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49998647,0.00518374,0.000018101786,0.16927333,0.0023204258,0.008858274,0.023121662,0.0005746263,0.29066336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720758,0.0009598003,0.00015059552,0.008175741,0.0020760065,0.0008829254,0.0004919687,0.0002755572,0.014911563],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98121214,0.002425763,0.0035270108,0.0033421633,0.0048865997,0.0046062954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98890465,0.004609334,0.0012496735,0.0020529449,0.0012437087,0.0019397048],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022859932,0.0028330751,0.003527622,0.00048922776,0.007174987,0.002659865,0.0065890653,0.0015001681,0.0014112208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003404161,0.0023318673,0.0018872478,0.0111269215,0.004197229,0.0036611734,0.0030032562,0.0037920238,0.0014891485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015762479,0.0042162654,0.029545764,0.00051212445,0.0015441837,0.002166099,0.24463953,0.00017516802,0.00019609228,0.02966241,0.68126076,0.0045053805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046556303,0.0012557535,0.024535274,0.0003863328,0.0004256965,0.000083076804,0.09000001,0.00068997854,0.000043082237,0.0008443471,0.8736165,0.0034642878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009372259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03113334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47208938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002152612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017169708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7111787380","doi":"","title":"Critical Conversations in Canadian Public Law","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public law; Critical race theory; Racism; Critical legal studies; Scholarship; Critical theory; Comparative law; Law reform; State (computer science); Indigenous","score_opus":0.02667086835374095,"score_gpt":0.3117404324428568,"score_spread":0.2850695640891159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7111787380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039166775,0.0036769002,0.000010044365,0.26019427,0.0037229508,0.0010450539,0.00014578649,0.00013003428,0.6919082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98210025,0.00028220195,0.00018120304,0.009567749,0.0004231691,0.00011261766,0.0000151535005,0.000018195153,0.007299449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949994,0.0007511112,0.00073744275,0.0007853673,0.00066932465,0.0020573286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965123,0.0008423004,0.00008529411,0.00040568406,0.00060261454,0.0015518351],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012219906,0.00040579523,0.00058844424,0.00018062987,0.0044521056,0.0011728316,0.00083273806,0.0005505164,0.004466843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004112182,0.00042179506,0.00023802502,0.0016744506,0.0032688992,0.00144633,0.00023254163,0.0009932257,0.0013686357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005398544,0.00009476897,0.018416284,0.00004773216,0.00007826086,0.000026225955,0.004635772,0.00000318751,0.000011172078,0.9686587,0.007728792,0.000293735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006643775,0.00003061977,0.01748608,0.0001764314,0.00007291655,5.729146e-7,0.015428695,0.00008825456,0.000027401049,0.014747199,0.95074046,0.00053697196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97987676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9539115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003515271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023323363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7113043087","doi":"","title":"Deciding on Death: Rodriguez, Carter, and Medically Assisted Dying in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Legalization; Politics; Legislature; Assisted suicide; Legislation; Criminalization; Constitutional right; Position (finance)","score_opus":0.026106561099123713,"score_gpt":0.28860400097992134,"score_spread":0.2624974398807976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7113043087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.917918,0.005777713,0.00001495596,0.013838181,0.002648826,0.00079759024,0.000025093885,0.0000662089,0.058913387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930323,0.0010503025,0.00022886563,0.0030707452,0.00030471917,0.000058734622,0.0000052056243,0.00002067214,0.0022284875],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99499875,0.0006775695,0.00089440885,0.0009492174,0.0012549594,0.001225083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99742883,0.0011966933,0.00023057261,0.00032805506,0.00019260604,0.0006232202],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010870969,0.0005087425,0.00083382434,0.00009161118,0.00225703,0.00037283672,0.0006110076,0.00032778908,0.00036360085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017268709,0.0004609052,0.00012329647,0.0009006946,0.0005315094,0.0003858513,0.00034984594,0.0010297575,0.000035767483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003757608,0.0006098747,0.63382965,0.00075180404,0.0013571479,0.0009300179,0.03705291,0.00026627193,0.0016262921,0.2035351,0.025001815,0.09466335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004156335,0.00016529961,0.71538323,0.0035974423,0.00029635103,0.00000503287,0.04236038,0.0005671685,0.0004972658,0.0019080867,0.22924551,0.0018178875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9886588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2042437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004543004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021924877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114833834","doi":"","title":"Equal Justice Under Law: Civil Recourse Theory, Access to Justice and the Rule of Law in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Rule of law; Public law; Work (physics); Inequality; Common law","score_opus":0.02814838000223407,"score_gpt":0.3175592319236567,"score_spread":0.28941085192142263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114833834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26791838,0.0119943125,0.0001681586,0.07712051,0.006319172,0.0033741703,0.00024887142,0.00007675646,0.63277966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97550845,0.0007909937,0.00009462021,0.019708874,0.00038708985,0.0001068264,0.0000030917906,0.000023690865,0.0033763868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99439335,0.0017054625,0.00097595894,0.0007988825,0.001024382,0.0011019416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99423546,0.0040084384,0.00035297728,0.00052480487,0.00044197528,0.00043632826],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002751016,0.0005033222,0.0009648599,0.000049313498,0.0026257203,0.0005629527,0.001498934,0.00025298636,0.0005759327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016069493,0.00037219957,0.00015343416,0.0009901766,0.0028243996,0.000816851,0.001079861,0.00084082247,0.000036276826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034471185,0.00008248129,0.00043232093,0.00037676856,0.00021033203,0.000010552371,0.01077528,0.00053507957,0.0000387464,0.9824624,0.0041733435,0.00055799255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01161914,0.00021197014,0.0219743,0.0025174937,0.006834034,0.000004225935,0.35688534,0.00032767342,0.0014298725,0.19872718,0.3965817,0.0028870504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.991824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7837352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014389388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014871797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114922838","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5876143","title":"Working with Bertha Wilson: Perspectives on Liberty, Judicial Decision-Making and a Judge’s Role","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Legislation; Order (exchange); Scope (computer science); Judicial review","score_opus":0.015222198507159031,"score_gpt":0.30333092976503145,"score_spread":0.2881087312578724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114922838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7677798,0.104537815,0.0022839236,0.017607328,0.0023510514,0.0018057592,0.000013352572,0.00033733615,0.10328359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.967798,0.027575437,0.0007080843,0.00014336986,0.0016953236,0.000028586424,0.0000011563595,0.00002616014,0.0020238732],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99510044,0.00035841335,0.0003778296,0.0007070523,0.0009999316,0.0024563184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830854,0.0006221704,0.00043028477,0.00020531619,0.00028880502,0.00014489496],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019431318,0.00045152337,0.000607395,0.00018700215,0.0026116918,0.0005479165,0.00063805556,0.0003907129,0.000033359058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006621379,0.0003360308,0.00023255993,0.00032869432,0.00045725136,0.00017948975,0.00049748836,0.00529691,0.0000066914918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00091228,0.00025172957,0.014316093,0.000027349502,0.0020486335,0.00003880873,0.20169641,0.00052183116,0.0000050972767,0.3704002,0.00054168643,0.4092399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011566376,0.00054131396,0.0050044144,0.003611391,0.00043350348,0.000064636035,0.36256027,0.00009866684,0.0000030406352,0.60282254,0.022500861,0.0012026975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027106889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05813083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4080372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004083583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003589183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115008836","doi":"10.2307/jj.36075940","title":"Critical Conversations in Canadian Public Law","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book","venue":"Les Presses de l’Université d’Ottawa | University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.027613002720031015,"score_gpt":0.24780625807184714,"score_spread":0.22019325535181614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115008836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006830821,0.002098791,0.00014937339,0.0067492435,0.0006165986,0.0015749222,0.0013027887,0.00018363628,0.9866416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6883681,0.0037326666,0.00082685973,0.00032115195,0.00022720588,0.000005005175,0.00020144948,0.00007174758,0.3062458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992343,0.0014899482,0.00086810556,0.0015351113,0.001237166,0.0025266502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931207,0.00196722,0.0007315214,0.00091591274,0.001634256,0.0016304189],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009393742,0.001092934,0.0016833073,0.00091598433,0.004909998,0.00034539704,0.0036473724,0.0021620353,0.0028490026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072093995,0.0014775449,0.00083235645,0.00036045964,0.0071468246,0.0011973215,0.0013529003,0.0018648128,0.000041296345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007684377,0.00020045543,0.0034917314,0.00094301585,0.0009233741,0.000654422,0.03351992,0.00007830516,0.000024680276,0.8982258,0.05932314,0.0025383155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016904913,0.00010393697,0.0028475104,0.00086113,0.00095153775,0.0000050378853,0.021313693,0.00018104457,0.000060807328,0.0010437504,0.96967405,0.0012670307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95389503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9752053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9103509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006543173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048757936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99913335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116219076","doi":"","title":"Tribe v. White Quills, 03-C-6177 (Blkft. Tr. Ct. App., Sept. 23, 2004)","year":2004,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"The Mathematics Enthusiast","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Hopi; Criminal Conviction; Criminal jurisdiction; Tribe; Conviction","score_opus":0.03169936152277048,"score_gpt":0.2933698564114382,"score_spread":0.2616704948886677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116219076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53954947,0.017354965,0.004179066,0.073755726,0.009598346,0.0135644935,0.0010585814,0.0020239053,0.33891544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96258956,0.0022228642,0.003828437,0.0007329979,0.0013784129,0.00015460528,0.00003662214,0.00014216146,0.028914364],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99196786,0.0005570867,0.0017452702,0.0010121431,0.0025713777,0.0021462613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953855,0.0009998189,0.0011852138,0.001325787,0.00050658465,0.00059706],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022699793,0.0012062284,0.0015008226,0.00013021071,0.0041792584,0.0011961678,0.0021882239,0.0003091963,0.0016885214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014865911,0.0007987761,0.0009448606,0.0016559608,0.003037267,0.0009050252,0.0008969902,0.0011298856,0.005221898],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003135375,0.0012109956,0.000035186364,0.00031246047,0.0005891182,0.00005002094,0.9496638,0.00080306083,0.00016391212,0.027360627,0.01854203,0.0012374037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009240682,0.0007563717,0.003415536,0.0032877938,0.0031811395,0.00022199372,0.6305074,0.0014093034,0.0016457113,0.018867638,0.32137048,0.006095912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002420721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036369676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42304006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013869116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036034375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116224082","doi":"","title":"Sexual Assault, Fault and the Charter","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Mens rea; Conviction; Supreme court; Legislative intent; Legislature; Criminal law; Legislation","score_opus":0.017736123235448955,"score_gpt":0.2905168983114676,"score_spread":0.27278077507601867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116224082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49890533,0.026405722,0.00004904925,0.14500752,0.0049392944,0.0029736732,0.00009235,0.00029685235,0.32133022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9215773,0.0014795002,0.00009888759,0.006029745,0.0010683582,0.0001357973,0.0000045269753,0.000019058152,0.06958686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954247,0.0010758272,0.000663385,0.00083526626,0.0009901725,0.0010106717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976507,0.0009218932,0.00023820107,0.00047921354,0.00037547937,0.0003345013],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019952217,0.00050898123,0.0007608398,0.000038307706,0.0048279976,0.0009777142,0.0008090126,0.00047187318,0.0009316434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010645776,0.0003245437,0.00023134817,0.0006637152,0.0045471354,0.0006268009,0.0006025964,0.0011019219,0.00059872825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033222194,0.00021737546,0.009008147,0.00020103589,0.0011245935,0.00001792493,0.060551375,0.000011341539,0.00025244642,0.8343041,0.07898639,0.014993066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040172664,0.00008040123,0.017070312,0.00016984422,0.00036073546,0.0000017911132,0.046806347,0.00018336324,0.000086629945,0.005977323,0.9245733,0.0006726784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042423476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025271153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8455869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030063567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001750882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7119496777","doi":"10.3138/9781487519117-013/html#mla","title":"A Role for Human Dignity under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Dignity; Human rights; Legislation; Bill of rights","score_opus":0.02102249728237336,"score_gpt":0.27593739965432035,"score_spread":0.25491490237194697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7119496777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94459856,0.0015920067,0.0000028023892,0.00532569,0.0006644316,0.0021428477,0.00015930137,0.000027987393,0.045486405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913652,0.000031871936,0.000056425502,0.00075655524,0.0005730189,0.00008066732,0.000008963122,0.000019729196,0.0071075466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972832,0.00028262852,0.00045485096,0.0005251306,0.00055737305,0.000896791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981269,0.00032512553,0.00025561903,0.00038963996,0.00033756508,0.0005651555],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085179356,0.00033658088,0.0005342515,0.000036982143,0.004498372,0.00036224443,0.000590249,0.00031797835,0.001159323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076322096,0.00022225728,0.00023876784,0.00022887201,0.0018573311,0.00044729584,0.00014067096,0.00041021738,0.00020787536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049882965,0.00015208013,0.017108502,0.00014610261,0.0006145128,0.0000017523173,0.053113297,0.000016000673,0.002151959,0.92073613,0.0055345874,0.00037521726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037912815,0.0006831867,0.18642636,0.0003261218,0.00047105917,0.0000021855733,0.046880696,0.00013705587,0.0011087077,0.17897382,0.5795935,0.0016060554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93107677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98708814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7417623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044669307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021007535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124434997","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i3.2236","title":"Competing Constitutional Rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Democracy; Limiting; Competition (biology); State (computer science); Fundamental rights","score_opus":0.03810785600891519,"score_gpt":0.3240699980064703,"score_spread":0.2859621419975551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124434997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051864884,0.0011475306,0.00007080405,0.0054444824,0.0022561615,0.000084521176,0.000020427897,0.00015127538,0.9856383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99738836,0.00008051335,0.00071904575,0.00012861515,0.0011395428,0.0000023258633,0.0000010762786,0.0000034806355,0.0005370208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988097,0.00013454202,0.00018567304,0.00012434575,0.00045229634,0.00029341792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994736,0.00017880293,0.000040604154,0.000033538032,0.00012593072,0.00014754155],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060748734,0.00008661688,0.00011318742,0.00002296299,0.012429282,0.00026974984,0.00014514115,0.00005660212,0.0008153673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008353255,0.00006048456,0.00011168616,0.00012657812,0.0011128836,0.00034844255,0.000035376688,0.00032792622,0.00030410275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017861745,0.000009519362,0.00005332507,0.000004276409,0.000045065903,0.0000817653,0.0015876929,0.000010714904,0.000019253714,0.9961569,0.0010566877,0.00097304245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008516075,0.000008191848,0.00007466192,0.00007781326,0.000015742136,0.000055139964,0.0015276714,0.000021688093,0.000043407646,0.0056526707,0.9923365,0.000101361984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036825167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011688203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99220186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003035837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019530828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9888564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125700347","doi":"10.1515/9781773855196-062","title":"7.4 Re Constitution of Canada, 1981: The Patriation Reference","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Subject (documents); Government (linguistics); Legislation; Criticism","score_opus":0.04361789889990325,"score_gpt":0.23184964454320636,"score_spread":0.1882317456433031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125700347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00050349557,0.0013406441,0.000049933064,0.00047099352,0.00060337724,0.00080216,0.00022919929,0.000028561282,0.9959716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37574774,0.0017608992,0.00008671828,0.000032951775,0.0001169323,6.3869027e-7,0.000022146134,0.000011733466,0.6222202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976256,0.00015828486,0.0004178569,0.0004360855,0.0010451089,0.0003171023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979125,0.00032351463,0.0007083479,0.00030875663,0.0006166846,0.0001301415],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003780356,0.00032979748,0.0005711707,0.000049577953,0.0012862238,0.00002776169,0.0007045455,0.0004291112,0.00024682417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000068073634,0.00027973528,0.0002583805,0.000027584461,0.0029801056,0.00011087725,0.00043205213,0.00056450936,0.0000056805075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010079459,0.000007721486,0.000011004546,0.00021451157,0.00039631504,0.000024839817,0.015851114,0.00001822394,0.000036963687,0.9794669,0.001051509,0.002820065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032836763,0.000063310225,0.00021546753,0.0006148206,0.0007714182,5.930116e-7,0.009136608,0.00012212458,0.00014138062,0.0019046075,0.98632574,0.0003755463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9199645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9052627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98527426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060651806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011044123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125703467","doi":"10.1515/9781773855196-090","title":"10.8 40 Years On, Canada’s Charter of Rights Is a Beacon to the World","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Human rights; Derogation","score_opus":0.024449458281661247,"score_gpt":0.22417422081630653,"score_spread":0.19972476253464527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125703467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011022507,0.0004127798,0.0000018566484,0.0015424057,0.00053584523,0.0010587579,0.00028974202,0.000029006185,0.99502736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038892593,0.000072007984,0.0000390737,0.00026321624,0.00017589988,0.0000010009971,0.0000057545535,0.000022309374,0.96052814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710023,0.00010313063,0.0003897533,0.0006516566,0.0012833755,0.00047183613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826896,0.00023649514,0.00037476208,0.00047295177,0.00035917838,0.00028764096],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022232634,0.00045983805,0.00076575833,0.00013165754,0.0008605645,0.00003973199,0.0011317898,0.00028340364,0.0032920744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013018103,0.000382439,0.00045009755,0.000043819975,0.0013499722,0.000067904235,0.0006170615,0.0005710819,0.00015851378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007047323,0.000046081936,0.0000035596215,0.00023245017,0.0019144911,0.00023465464,0.09755162,0.000009031206,0.000037739723,0.75468796,0.13653158,0.008046096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002600328,0.00013270877,0.00014746211,0.0005856476,0.0004541467,4.1889098e-7,0.0011181226,0.00001891427,0.000159504,0.0005013949,0.9962012,0.00042040888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87493545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9454017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8596697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053166196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039541462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125706973","doi":"10.1515/9781773855196-009","title":"1.7 Thomas M.J. Bateman, “Liberal versus Post- Liberal Constitutionalism: Applying the Charter to Civil Society”","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Civil rights; Process (computing); Liberalism; Civil procedure","score_opus":0.04372854433866244,"score_gpt":0.2547056248620125,"score_spread":0.21097708052335004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125706973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00075921527,0.001039174,0.00009125588,0.002194404,0.0024029016,0.0032688936,0.0003796501,0.00019901824,0.9896655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0150053175,0.0007961262,0.0006333068,0.00089310756,0.0009437899,0.000024994195,0.000051903047,0.00007373832,0.9815777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99556404,0.00019990794,0.0005833347,0.0011317941,0.0016044154,0.00091651414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971671,0.00059614994,0.00045221898,0.00054783066,0.00077157404,0.00046511873],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056877703,0.00087154406,0.0010179154,0.00009496181,0.003451703,0.00024991808,0.0015220311,0.0008139768,0.00091154856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004227309,0.00075594225,0.0014611704,0.00006137995,0.0054194354,0.00033192945,0.0017647393,0.0012151648,0.00022090024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005744135,0.00003207029,0.000004723074,0.00024258097,0.00200266,0.000090141766,0.070785,0.000023709394,0.00012034865,0.91579795,0.0076709357,0.0026554558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001179679,0.00018481612,0.00004757864,0.0005383954,0.0011562029,0.0000050343842,0.007243593,0.00013378245,0.000034044988,0.00144767,0.98709184,0.00093735213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013110281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007261176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9794209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006085381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003621856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7127612896","doi":"10.1353/book.142464","title":"Critical Conversations in Canadian Public Law","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.03979328767763925,"score_gpt":0.27062764749586227,"score_spread":0.23083435981822303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7127612896","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014338439,0.00033536428,0.000012950075,0.0056130346,0.000608289,0.00082306593,0.0004796529,0.00004405024,0.9919402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53367996,0.0002178453,0.00018303956,0.00020379639,0.00009237072,0.0000014833915,0.00003219359,0.0000123117015,0.46557698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99654484,0.00055780256,0.0004385461,0.0006708309,0.0006555946,0.0011323775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996901,0.0008269489,0.00023693893,0.00034898764,0.00090102956,0.00078509154],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005699233,0.00041115336,0.0008048444,0.00034081782,0.0025389444,0.00013287169,0.0012506534,0.00091100606,0.00061159726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057698914,0.0005281615,0.00034358687,0.00010774108,0.0058261813,0.00038881347,0.00040839994,0.0007824211,0.000027804404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000780815,0.000039663846,0.000383397,0.00017862383,0.00017462131,0.000066376175,0.022378037,0.0000026731461,0.0000010490345,0.9648718,0.011437034,0.00045888967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005633898,0.00003139132,0.0005233234,0.00032027584,0.0002055551,3.3912588e-7,0.009205698,0.00004331526,0.000006434778,0.0010203976,0.9876121,0.0004677515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98016495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99405414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97617507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031176035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042411587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132565204","doi":"","title":"The sound symbolic lexis of Old English: Old English verbs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e_Buah","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Old English; Sound (geography); Field (mathematics); Thesaurus","score_opus":0.028673250757794234,"score_gpt":0.3049482452033586,"score_spread":0.27627499444556436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132565204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.789743,0.0008174538,0.0000029095045,0.0013641508,0.0026592975,0.00033795173,0.000011092422,0.00016628069,0.20489788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98162717,0.00028585797,0.00007006068,0.00021517457,0.0037021732,0.000022832348,0.0000014034154,0.000012547085,0.014062811],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982528,0.00019033892,0.00025680778,0.00023785983,0.00056741905,0.00049475033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998259,0.00047604725,0.00014193104,0.00026183637,0.000752951,0.00010823061],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068235054,0.00014916723,0.0002229663,0.000020058182,0.0017721253,0.00014331931,0.00053806696,0.00012599559,0.00022396295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028309063,0.000098842895,0.00013048731,0.0003055817,0.001577154,0.00021890008,0.00015200533,0.0001697292,0.0001285672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003813055,0.000090713875,0.017670052,0.000021633643,0.00018164719,0.0000019146012,0.7082048,0.0000015514884,0.00020307305,0.20661846,0.062681615,0.0042864196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003224393,0.00007469923,0.01599159,0.00002692997,0.00003265193,1.06795405e-7,0.0506465,0.0000028672896,0.00074186875,0.0023568994,0.9295752,0.00022826114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068942923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00677401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8668936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014356778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050868715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132872496","doi":"","title":"Firearms control in Canada: Bill-C-68 and its amendments to the forfeiture of firearms and weapons provisions in the Criminal Code","year":2008,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Control (management); Criminal code; Code (set theory); Crime control; Legislation","score_opus":0.03736355973329726,"score_gpt":0.35712621043679343,"score_spread":0.3197626507034962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132872496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9660212,0.003954333,9.3881755e-7,0.025894724,0.00026303722,0.0029407155,0.00013318541,0.000006352165,0.0007855263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99307096,0.0038721394,0.000014073366,0.000555843,0.000080713726,0.00025338028,0.000021696593,0.000017160384,0.0021140068],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667406,0.00055546284,0.0005445004,0.0005464095,0.0010013559,0.00067821296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998147,0.00090829306,0.00036136244,0.00020992548,0.0001942373,0.0001791961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006639543,0.00043650516,0.0006970818,0.00007495266,0.0012214922,0.00008159559,0.0005286058,0.00023247974,0.000042701744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000734177,0.00022080647,0.00007938548,0.0006321389,0.00030960445,0.00012956392,0.00009394644,0.0006615426,0.0000035942164],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024393253,0.00012799616,0.012062959,0.00014909919,0.00010630261,0.00003133485,0.9811853,0.000121163626,0.0004887904,0.00017398823,0.003211977,0.0020971266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010181629,0.00014577982,0.31639686,0.0003426054,0.00014462028,0.000003469598,0.6706615,0.00044812728,0.00006523942,0.000018833642,0.0103831105,0.00037166878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9704767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9926319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3105238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051328226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009185248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93948543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132884982","doi":"","title":"Bertha Wilson: postmodern judge in a postmodern time","year":2000,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Postmodernism; Supreme court; Enlightenment; Charter; Neutrality; Constitutionalism; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.02155017402529486,"score_gpt":0.348343743005144,"score_spread":0.3267935689798491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132884982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86091304,0.0060659163,0.0000015477124,0.0069555715,0.00087608164,0.0018776266,0.00003245129,0.00019625454,0.12308149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74960583,0.0040498585,0.00016580231,0.00048394763,0.00080993836,0.00015513084,0.00046724454,0.00012658258,0.24413565],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99271566,0.00081285776,0.001069221,0.0016385003,0.0018373909,0.0019263761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974124,0.00046329357,0.00067050575,0.00055380946,0.00040527905,0.0004947559],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007966818,0.001260364,0.0016372782,0.00022131456,0.0017919628,0.00041287398,0.0011589322,0.0015384726,0.007297073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039714214,0.0012156526,0.0006227632,0.0012342472,0.00063807535,0.00060416217,0.00015209267,0.001468451,0.0051727216],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007194863,0.00044663413,0.0010756105,0.0001547187,0.0002481946,0.00008201352,0.9794487,0.00012074349,0.00088489865,0.00018941402,0.0018404068,0.0147891985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004984214,0.0009220091,0.116769224,0.0025551058,0.0009706599,0.00001690965,0.44383577,0.005300679,0.00028220617,0.0017643076,0.4149995,0.0075994185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08317063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043932904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53561294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011310715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005329104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132901665","doi":"","title":"The end of law: Canada&apos;s national security legislation and the principle of shared humanity","year":2005,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Legislation; National security; Government (linguistics); Humanity; Dignity","score_opus":0.0425904170175612,"score_gpt":0.3868339187630873,"score_spread":0.3442435017455261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132901665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79439485,0.004299666,7.2340504e-7,0.0050673834,0.0005713607,0.0013813607,0.00011601553,0.000012877527,0.19415575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99179316,0.0010613381,0.00002634379,0.000055407087,0.0002963735,0.000042844244,0.0000801755,0.00001076812,0.0066335653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964662,0.00054033083,0.0006110511,0.00030317024,0.0017533125,0.00032593118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99590975,0.0013705227,0.0011662696,0.00017665903,0.0013057498,0.00007102773],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015415984,0.0002778183,0.00048196927,0.00001907835,0.0028396582,0.0001026555,0.00046161184,0.00020533217,0.00019439275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011402727,0.00016781031,0.00014652881,0.0002080519,0.00214402,0.00018943686,0.0001065238,0.00038258164,0.0000014202994],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020890789,0.00004998751,0.00037373163,0.00011066068,0.0002609987,2.405005e-7,0.36121204,0.000041960822,0.00009266938,0.6366898,0.0007038862,0.00025514996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031795092,0.00010781211,0.14492518,0.00035278732,0.00052984076,0.0000011021,0.40188903,0.0010480047,0.0012849075,0.012126198,0.43357867,0.0009769669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8988881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99278057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6245636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004843203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00100195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132904707","doi":"","title":"Access to Justice in Ontario&apos;s Family Courts: The Parents&apos; Perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Economic Justice; Windsor; Permission; Legislation; Reproduction","score_opus":0.14312187593781545,"score_gpt":0.4547699732637587,"score_spread":0.31164809732594323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132904707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8190244,0.00022912273,0.00004790814,0.08106525,0.00059631566,0.00062664616,0.0000035752591,0.00007181165,0.09833498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768906,0.0001238178,0.00009124204,0.001230119,0.00024525693,0.00007277256,3.0390044e-7,0.000009739301,0.02133613],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983161,0.00021282345,0.00014907938,0.00031891328,0.0004991082,0.0005039581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989133,0.00043725007,0.000072464754,0.00018874786,0.00024790686,0.00014033627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048112503,0.00015618875,0.00019357374,0.000033548695,0.00077625545,0.00016522208,0.000648116,0.000078618665,0.00033491448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009343207,0.000082255145,0.000063256295,0.00027207393,0.00031432215,0.00033217474,0.00023754295,0.00018852192,0.00025429568],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006441482,0.00007966665,0.038123354,0.0000050281856,0.00005539513,0.000010636523,0.9177147,0.00001571625,0.00048604087,0.01716365,0.02493955,0.0013418063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003908219,0.00003803335,0.32825607,0.0000675291,0.000044801945,2.651134e-7,0.4544001,9.982222e-7,0.000052613366,0.0007408545,0.21576221,0.0002456904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7967421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89594316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46331465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020698388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019917254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5970408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132906993","doi":"","title":"Precedents in Canadian and American Constitutional Culture: A Comparative Essay","year":2016,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional economics; Constitutional law; Proportionality (law); Narrative; Politics; Constitutional interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional theory","score_opus":0.03493865116987113,"score_gpt":0.40514076393850973,"score_spread":0.37020211276863857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132906993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77912,0.0020863768,0.0000044163858,0.0047205924,0.0009932378,0.0013391582,0.000100482335,0.000032958204,0.21160276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95316607,0.0015373125,0.00009227388,0.00009834611,0.00021302585,0.000106842876,0.000093966606,0.000009643603,0.04468255],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688315,0.00042007805,0.00038218018,0.0006903246,0.0006350725,0.0009891737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981915,0.0002093768,0.0004057924,0.00011815437,0.0003662217,0.0007089977],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036305754,0.00049049844,0.0007870956,0.00014201312,0.0017652126,0.00017930455,0.00031064491,0.0003165539,0.0004358528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003509037,0.0003787078,0.00010257394,0.00059929164,0.004669435,0.00025566338,0.000048435777,0.00044766386,0.00017279664],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075567026,0.000060328894,0.057559628,0.000046659105,0.00020872231,0.0000144167625,0.92294896,0.0000033551057,0.00019526531,0.015700264,0.0020062632,0.0011805585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009262438,0.00011020739,0.2005912,0.00065582665,0.000099475445,0.000002083182,0.63516533,0.000021629654,0.000111113186,0.00017463569,0.16110747,0.0010347569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92536336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98317087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28778362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020826038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001975204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132917390","doi":"","title":"The principles of the rule of law and Charkaoui v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)","year":2007,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Supreme court; Rule of law; Government (linguistics); Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Flexibility (engineering); Transcendental number","score_opus":0.0288917985584744,"score_gpt":0.3386170164941599,"score_spread":0.30972521793568547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132917390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94975257,0.0059251133,4.1439148e-7,0.004313728,0.0005155242,0.00064571394,0.000019974212,0.0000057952534,0.03882115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97688866,0.0024151944,0.00002771368,0.00010077846,0.000098830686,0.000014677062,0.000007882282,0.000011403111,0.02043487],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788487,0.00022621086,0.0004630222,0.00026962085,0.00080832024,0.0003479274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763775,0.00087358925,0.0007654861,0.00019811894,0.0004313226,0.00009372654],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072037015,0.00025799553,0.00039726196,0.000013189478,0.0023640534,0.0000662735,0.00032408774,0.00019286796,0.000023835228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048108186,0.00014420354,0.0000877765,0.00022676891,0.0015882452,0.00005240897,0.00010592621,0.00026864852,4.2855785e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017507056,0.0000408371,0.019041263,0.00068028143,0.00057390286,0.000001881831,0.7783006,0.00000980977,0.0026803685,0.1945073,0.0011652848,0.002823392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036636656,0.000050450933,0.40911868,0.00035725822,0.00022707334,9.385146e-7,0.5410176,0.000032398795,0.0072970684,0.00044915237,0.04067493,0.00040810823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8820303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98189855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39007744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013782625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038782688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99893475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132938458","doi":"","title":"Recognition of Indigenous Peoples&apos; Inherent Jurisdiction in the Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families: A Step Towards the Institutionalization of Canadian Pluralism","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Jurisdiction; Institutionalisation; Plural; Pluralism (philosophy); Legal pluralism; Common law; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.04778161257166952,"score_gpt":0.3363207976189116,"score_spread":0.2885391850472421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132938458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98878443,0.003186268,0.0000070526007,0.0019584605,0.00031713,0.0023496328,0.00030111102,0.000015380525,0.0030805562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714168,0.027464427,0.000050081617,0.00004744662,0.00010422281,0.00011015254,0.00055999716,0.000011234184,0.0002356481],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712306,0.0006003746,0.00071444653,0.00042807162,0.00074638415,0.00038767816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976758,0.00067161815,0.0007826836,0.00017116033,0.00061483413,0.00008395007],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011909445,0.0003424367,0.00045896633,0.00078373513,0.003293737,0.00016041053,0.0003091196,0.00038532307,0.000029322813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001845445,0.0002458529,0.00010059338,0.002245944,0.00050063635,0.00027717004,0.000064780834,0.00044286664,8.7704143e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043048054,0.000051175964,0.011539205,0.00025434035,0.00012710928,5.075591e-7,0.9777449,0.000051612482,0.000010757007,0.0010211482,0.000029095647,0.009127108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036884073,0.00006419036,0.39394328,0.0009222582,0.00021267378,0.0000015009243,0.6037211,0.000025324738,0.00004169695,0.00005702355,0.0004407784,0.00020136122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9289719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38240406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007139377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017382993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132970973","doi":"","title":"Deportation on national security grounds within a culture of legal justification","year":2004,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Principle of legality; Constitutionality; Charter; National security; Commission; Immigration; United Nations Charter","score_opus":0.03451260254406341,"score_gpt":0.39481616439540457,"score_spread":0.36030356185134116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132970973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84033555,0.0009580999,0.000048729173,0.001762655,0.0029301841,0.0018206472,0.00006634119,0.00014611213,0.15193172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97551143,0.00049767876,0.00046840517,0.00009614978,0.00068816997,0.00013204654,0.0012266963,0.00003994131,0.02133947],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941098,0.00034711076,0.0011133491,0.0009052751,0.0030103163,0.0005141641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944375,0.00018778864,0.0022883853,0.00023671272,0.0026492602,0.0002003581],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010090392,0.00065231614,0.00074249785,0.00016343812,0.0015872527,0.00022120331,0.00047386848,0.00096273323,0.00023199282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016822028,0.00059729913,0.00039005344,0.001061785,0.00055867404,0.000566671,0.000032543645,0.00091731065,0.00010918828],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002637014,0.0005200817,0.00021363827,0.00052170415,0.00028136332,0.000005222359,0.7845031,0.0010931937,0.0026545352,0.20834398,0.0013602356,0.00023924642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015536288,0.00057309447,0.022688057,0.0013583422,0.0006370304,0.0000037479363,0.93986726,0.00030707018,0.008568732,0.012727401,0.010101708,0.0016139137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024913892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016843777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19561657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015882475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011824786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132979673","doi":"","title":"Rights, reason and respectthe separation of powers and the application of Section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2008,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legitimacy; Supreme court; Section (typography); Context (archaeology); Judicial review; Separation of powers; Bill of rights","score_opus":0.012196209042129877,"score_gpt":0.32191645872221286,"score_spread":0.309720249680083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132979673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98886114,0.0024093322,0.0000078070225,0.0010347785,0.00022470734,0.001409536,0.000025567466,0.0000045485135,0.006022554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973861,0.0011449491,0.000035914283,0.000006926588,0.00008017439,0.00002885685,0.00001735888,0.000007536088,0.0012922069],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805385,0.000393994,0.00051350653,0.00030796,0.00053712516,0.00019355638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765724,0.00026827317,0.0012321955,0.00023088176,0.0005263769,0.00008503646],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006135453,0.00023017944,0.0005639398,0.00008098664,0.0011861827,0.000022224955,0.00017979015,0.00032739824,0.000015954472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001278443,0.0001287649,0.0001040692,0.00039372785,0.0028492832,0.00012975416,0.000030360412,0.00021186254,2.948686e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005377378,0.00006486561,0.0058612246,0.00034290596,0.00034250974,2.3574178e-7,0.9573373,0.000016744372,0.007758575,0.026418317,0.00053721585,0.00078234816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045449096,0.00053103355,0.7251335,0.0010408743,0.0012841679,0.000009791474,0.2105168,0.00143986,0.032376587,0.0079207625,0.014282064,0.0009197013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86757505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87602645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7468205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000119455166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001428989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132984994","doi":"","title":"Thomas Jefferson&apos;s Essay on the Anglo-Saxon Language in context, a study of Jefferson&apos;s analytical method","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural language; Criticism; On Language","score_opus":0.08464660169661407,"score_gpt":0.46891198190551564,"score_spread":0.38426538020890155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132984994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86744034,0.000737295,0.0000077814175,0.0013733928,0.00064429984,0.002169185,0.000011023926,0.000089219415,0.12752745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8862645,0.00008744707,0.000101496844,0.00013172578,0.00025862042,0.00017191633,0.000032271953,0.00004346698,0.112908565],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99480855,0.0020212233,0.0005215361,0.0006630957,0.0013062075,0.0006793582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99670637,0.0020147543,0.00046057615,0.00042894407,0.00024169858,0.00014764282],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019462738,0.0005147143,0.0010235104,0.00017897593,0.00063455815,0.00009899366,0.00070833403,0.00046708144,0.00040619387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018985568,0.0003457487,0.00028798138,0.000996946,0.00023530796,0.0001046506,0.00006969022,0.0009062915,0.000036470006],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035477392,0.0007567987,0.002259047,0.00007858732,0.00032859764,0.00007981738,0.979573,0.000011921582,0.000110239416,0.002949192,0.006533009,0.006964988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000972508,0.00035829918,0.0077439696,0.00022554342,0.00022906077,2.9019333e-7,0.9835881,0.00005370773,0.0003071924,0.00006617308,0.006020563,0.0004345641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10763753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5349562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4273187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006360628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016858566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132986439","doi":"","title":"Human rights protection in Canada: A unique, multi-dimensional approach","year":2007,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Legislation; Jurisdiction; State (computer science); Fundamental rights; Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.048754202540806854,"score_gpt":0.373166149309887,"score_spread":0.32441194676908014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132986439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96646506,0.00064805907,0.00005179525,0.0004367153,0.0011979701,0.0034892275,0.000008496511,0.00008105902,0.027621627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94340146,0.000021097372,0.0012837903,0.000058674854,0.0003444347,0.00030739274,0.00017742989,0.00004292209,0.054362774],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99453706,0.00061534037,0.0008586086,0.0010736915,0.0017201069,0.0011951977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980134,0.00010321395,0.00071286387,0.00025936367,0.00057423586,0.0003369611],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010054249,0.00075427635,0.00089564023,0.00021296776,0.003455653,0.000095276526,0.00047713492,0.000798887,0.00037166942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014729142,0.0006752839,0.0002019009,0.0011908804,0.0003309928,0.00022330965,0.000084885105,0.0014890828,0.000034270506],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061045407,0.0026093028,0.0059860675,0.0015193666,0.0010198955,0.00029026347,0.95907325,0.0034634792,0.0057654087,0.008804475,0.0067672073,0.0040908353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042504645,0.00026034354,0.37304765,0.0013478257,0.00033579423,0.000007810693,0.56226003,0.005127389,0.0027374558,0.0003219907,0.045757923,0.004545309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9994168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3968132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006824862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018038038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132995586","doi":"","title":"The Principles of Fundamental Justice and the &quot;Societal Consensus&quot; Requirement","year":2016,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Norm (philosophy); Supreme court; Economic Justice; Competence (human resources); State (computer science)","score_opus":0.060126345755816914,"score_gpt":0.3931326312161623,"score_spread":0.3330062854603454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132995586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8434375,0.018251983,0.000005255508,0.037236217,0.0032279147,0.002965465,0.000041233103,0.000059831887,0.094774604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82965225,0.016415257,0.00008863732,0.000120381585,0.00059444044,0.00013053262,0.000013193045,0.00003315241,0.15295215],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949153,0.0010323934,0.0009293981,0.0006599162,0.0015831536,0.0008798207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993373,0.0038892853,0.0015104872,0.00042092218,0.00061854906,0.00018779794],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027468,0.00060855114,0.00082143006,0.000025481228,0.0070265257,0.0003159253,0.0007923792,0.0003699304,0.00018521135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019027384,0.00028277442,0.00045458978,0.00028455604,0.0077968026,0.00011660377,0.00036766793,0.00048720828,0.0000556359],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011244304,0.00012527397,0.0011666705,0.00058914383,0.001399379,0.0000042812917,0.89390504,0.000004634374,0.002403044,0.091631405,0.0030279483,0.0046187253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021669394,0.00012142653,0.0089464,0.00042895644,0.0014403472,0.000002098582,0.9094698,0.000052563948,0.00054624834,0.0003271967,0.075977296,0.00052077067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005443892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062545137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091304205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041353455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032014222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133007193","doi":"","title":"Aquitted with an Asterisk: Implementing the &quot;New Double Jeopardy&quot; Exception into Canadian Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Double jeopardy; Commonwealth; Government (linguistics); Criminal justice; State (computer science); Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.047165954359297255,"score_gpt":0.3889701871818563,"score_spread":0.341804232822559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133007193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8239763,0.0006755378,0.0000066679168,0.0036104934,0.000827961,0.0011586206,0.000009431186,0.00014883805,0.16958615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9227314,0.00006966457,0.00026166748,0.0001720486,0.0014088892,0.000095709176,0.00043061675,0.000046876583,0.07478312],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974504,0.00020730092,0.00026272782,0.0003903169,0.0006761713,0.0010130712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985762,0.000055040116,0.00032907558,0.00028053412,0.0002504059,0.0005087416],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007311956,0.0003512057,0.00034125685,0.000058126818,0.003820646,0.00039711845,0.0004778892,0.00028695175,0.001203476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042195825,0.00023960367,0.000092159244,0.00032514238,0.00020186494,0.0004816635,0.000042326916,0.00039825623,0.0001705395],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011171371,0.000025453674,0.0023411505,0.000053286527,0.00016219058,0.00000343517,0.97244483,0.000003848003,0.00028688923,0.012516529,0.0059336782,0.0061170002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043392717,0.00006595119,0.019301405,0.000087165216,0.00018156512,6.02968e-7,0.46973145,0.0000019508273,0.00014060292,0.00015354205,0.50939244,0.00050938805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.976774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50345874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074602745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000560376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133026633","doi":"","title":"Canada&apos;s Charter of Rights: Paradigm Lost?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Deference; Legislature; Politics; State (computer science); Judicial review; Scrutiny; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.05338266488725851,"score_gpt":0.3389596590394113,"score_spread":0.28557699415215276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133026633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4042093,0.0016882927,0.00000536296,0.058854878,0.0005172125,0.00033965334,0.000012312455,0.00005987463,0.53431314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624362,0.00008284142,0.000061760365,0.0002443659,0.00018079007,0.0000045708084,5.8488826e-7,0.000004147235,0.03698473],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999013,0.00006940978,0.00011762341,0.00013084123,0.0003818979,0.00028721962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958473,0.000080249294,0.00007005489,0.0001071665,0.000057131398,0.00010068151],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009589084,0.0000879759,0.00016096188,0.000011259763,0.0003657646,0.000017354563,0.00016638177,0.000049788105,0.002344643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006628356,0.000066719105,0.00004347996,0.00014087783,0.00022278652,0.00007901235,0.000024626801,0.00007683971,0.00012909628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008628777,0.00009530016,0.0027140018,0.00002367672,0.00011653893,0.000022894483,0.28699055,0.0000062981944,0.00023008535,0.052054916,0.65650874,0.0012283307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015672798,0.000016457361,0.0032696074,0.000014636764,0.000013700934,3.2389315e-7,0.007886699,0.000019486022,0.00030112054,0.00036531145,0.9878102,0.00014571603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9607436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9403322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55822694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020592494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005162798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99856734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133028872","doi":"","title":"Democracy in moments of fear: examining law, criminality, terror and other anxieties","year":2006,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Democracy; State (computer science); Civil liberties; State of emergency; Government (linguistics); National security; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.0689673521266243,"score_gpt":0.39930220867616883,"score_spread":0.33033485654954453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133028872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9491887,0.0019966292,0.000001150309,0.0008014097,0.00048497177,0.0006500949,0.000012252022,0.00002875532,0.04683604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9602947,0.0003593464,0.00026716918,0.00008648139,0.00014189977,0.00003906495,0.000025418165,0.000035045992,0.038750835],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99677426,0.00042985298,0.00069336535,0.0006106909,0.0008555215,0.00063629495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985702,0.00023098066,0.00069717923,0.00018324345,0.00020484056,0.00011352352],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072769,0.0004894442,0.0008593694,0.000106366286,0.0008163417,0.0001327497,0.00032177733,0.00046033686,0.00021190503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020871662,0.00045477462,0.000117533564,0.00037518237,0.0009715639,0.00025675126,0.00013465036,0.0003893605,0.000014437864],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107703636,0.00023023362,0.10835986,0.00075379637,0.00013129448,0.0000066122757,0.8841653,0.000014505024,0.0018320573,0.0018779149,0.00072089594,0.0017998656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000683723,0.00011318383,0.2763791,0.0006975687,0.00016571434,5.7638607e-7,0.71446526,0.000022599177,0.0007910944,0.00062393636,0.005432478,0.00062474346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22584298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07970028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16969998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024053207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000074137046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133033861","doi":"","title":"Reconciliation and Third-Party Interests: Tsilhqot&apos;in Nation v. British Columbia","year":2010,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); White paper; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.04722458908151616,"score_gpt":0.35864177628788285,"score_spread":0.3114171872063667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133033861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9673981,0.00086173456,0.0000033007416,0.007112363,0.0020195823,0.0007329369,0.000012035729,0.0000831517,0.021776814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97141516,0.0012414309,0.00030571056,0.00018351473,0.000545229,0.00004148769,0.0000064719616,0.000016756248,0.026244223],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975181,0.00030990015,0.0004537679,0.00060204964,0.00053841627,0.0005777583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987117,0.00029571075,0.00028891166,0.00017159643,0.00032628383,0.00020577277],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001238896,0.00019751361,0.00038491876,0.000033498123,0.001171066,0.0013106768,0.00025552177,0.00042454439,0.0015728249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019556931,0.00028657148,0.00008805724,0.0004735986,0.00078264106,0.000707002,0.00016667163,0.00075861195,0.000091022775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004719353,0.00037232242,0.3615895,0.00018216361,0.00010877892,0.000035527715,0.49312854,0.0000041783037,0.006427671,0.0014421375,0.061939444,0.07472256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013397735,0.00012759454,0.79104656,0.00022169111,0.000058939222,0.000008771599,0.094836414,0.00045241026,0.0001026756,0.0014935774,0.10957782,0.000733792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5799583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97194153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42945707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003854776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000115780276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133047736","doi":"","title":"Equality at a crossroads :brethinking equality in family law","year":2005,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada; Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Legalization; Institution; Gender equality; Racial equality; Family life; Law reform","score_opus":0.09081241641320743,"score_gpt":0.44606186888462296,"score_spread":0.35524945247141554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133047736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74125224,0.0043576583,0.0000080196905,0.002747527,0.0016437207,0.0012926866,0.000027847651,0.00018131327,0.24848896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9091424,0.0014415982,0.00033843963,0.00097594404,0.0009579028,0.00014691579,0.00019675346,0.00006709079,0.08673299],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895622,0.0023673496,0.0017009848,0.0017589758,0.0025679162,0.002042574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959032,0.0010180805,0.0013270265,0.000669364,0.0006322484,0.00045007828],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050303866,0.0011608937,0.0017533194,0.000105699415,0.0046895836,0.00057983084,0.0011912901,0.0018291431,0.0012835319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000988399,0.001132001,0.0007108764,0.0011845768,0.001819022,0.00067319005,0.0005322391,0.0018836663,0.00072925276],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003034476,0.00031454157,0.0064456286,0.00040959578,0.0001775674,0.000013185447,0.9467813,0.00007612279,0.0018780618,0.04089476,0.0005042636,0.0022015579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017904626,0.000119572316,0.14888982,0.000801727,0.00019573774,8.945187e-7,0.6721458,0.00012230816,0.00077882427,0.001534467,0.17098044,0.002639961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37586772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59154356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2746355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044401973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042268718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133064229","doi":"","title":"Reframing dialogues: toward a multidimensional approach to Charter dialogue","year":2004,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Dialogic; Legislature; Cognitive reframing; Scholarship; Meaning (existential); Normative","score_opus":0.05487163094413703,"score_gpt":0.35504539941798396,"score_spread":0.3001737684738469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133064229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.861345,0.0035944243,0.0010050542,0.0097440295,0.009730297,0.007487055,0.00013717817,0.00064150017,0.10631547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94707274,0.00077990897,0.009107672,0.00079641887,0.0026753221,0.00069274666,0.0013441793,0.00014066644,0.037390362],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99258107,0.0005620379,0.0009851898,0.001904434,0.0021405723,0.0018266845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967519,0.0003764357,0.0006557543,0.00049476285,0.0008153899,0.0009057322],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009732786,0.0012570665,0.0015223966,0.00022630085,0.0028270576,0.00032122736,0.0008951184,0.0012781194,0.00032949296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012601545,0.0011255686,0.0006856371,0.001144033,0.000598497,0.00037773262,0.00030455322,0.0012189094,0.0017983904],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017650114,0.00050241995,0.00013732287,0.00032016102,0.00033105485,0.000014807586,0.98968303,0.0002740567,0.0017714077,0.0030268244,0.001935458,0.0018269535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019148653,0.0003615574,0.014842599,0.0011069189,0.0005144878,0.0000041576377,0.89258146,0.00015482775,0.00081877457,0.0002594635,0.08428694,0.0031539577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05171145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048438264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097101584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016250868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006448419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133065537","doi":"","title":"The doctrine of political purposes in charity law: its troubled history and problematic rationales","year":2004,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Agency (philosophy); Statement (logic); Position (finance); Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.04858259797176499,"score_gpt":0.3676442681538776,"score_spread":0.31906167018211257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133065537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9167523,0.024641206,0.0000013999304,0.013627304,0.00067707873,0.0026391512,0.000008290567,0.000037110312,0.041616153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98072994,0.0026998438,0.00009216964,0.00005675758,0.00014247702,0.00019030008,0.000028433242,0.000015087972,0.016044967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968781,0.00041300248,0.0007695297,0.00043114703,0.00084864395,0.00065959553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777013,0.0008963791,0.00054503605,0.00015635547,0.00046402973,0.0001680553],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008574589,0.00037005302,0.0007009284,0.000059419377,0.00096010586,0.00008012455,0.00034299644,0.0003204892,0.00015535518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010546457,0.00026401,0.00014699549,0.00024224019,0.0013060473,0.00024395133,0.0000728541,0.00045867614,0.000015637972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008109169,0.00014729486,0.00031086316,0.00079319393,0.000081817736,0.000002453899,0.16764992,0.00000749947,0.0009700764,0.82978714,0.00007882285,0.00008981063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00504092,0.0005681304,0.22645165,0.0035317582,0.0006944075,0.0000055077985,0.68585247,0.00022475046,0.0033008477,0.045721788,0.02645235,0.0021554346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055523567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09639956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78406537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015679965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066246267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133072881","doi":"","title":"Honest counsel: Institutional dialogue and the Canadian rule of law","year":2007,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Democracy; Charter; Legislature; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Rule of law; Politics","score_opus":0.03021150804244396,"score_gpt":0.3614680968481793,"score_spread":0.3312565888057354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133072881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64424247,0.007097356,0.0000052142577,0.007978315,0.002355873,0.0014136606,0.0000793878,0.00003136169,0.33679634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98785204,0.0019094938,0.00007245589,0.00035495544,0.00043310373,0.00003544245,0.00015486339,0.00001476069,0.009172859],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974402,0.0002572917,0.0004193948,0.0003723077,0.00091375614,0.0005970018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979901,0.0005135782,0.00038710353,0.00016190206,0.0006220377,0.0003252994],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013388573,0.00034374328,0.00057842105,0.00006633856,0.0050316607,0.00016325078,0.0003727373,0.00053083437,0.00019708247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043162415,0.00024007897,0.00016986139,0.00036812518,0.0059217825,0.00015660422,0.000034360834,0.00048602844,0.000051664647],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012588929,0.000030543128,0.00055279094,0.00009506881,0.00017526514,0.000007816467,0.5315298,0.000018290666,0.00003246065,0.46635714,0.00048009522,0.00059488503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033791673,0.00008645659,0.08733405,0.00049183134,0.0006440125,0.000006319885,0.38393885,0.00006723597,0.00026730687,0.0038153147,0.51863426,0.0013352252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98638356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99564964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51815414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005283168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011228182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99678355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133090787","doi":"","title":"Deconstructing and Reconstructing Constitutional Rights: Jacques Derrida’s General Strategy of Deconstruction and the Constitutional Rights of Canada’s Indigenous Peoples","year":2022,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Oxford; National Archives and Records Administration","keywords":"Deconstruction (building); Interpretation (philosophy); Oppression; Ideology; Injustice; Economic Justice; Indigenous; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.016832773997456453,"score_gpt":0.31217256150544576,"score_spread":0.2953397875079893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133090787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.968303,0.007421696,0.000024783909,0.0002902632,0.00195444,0.0012548488,0.00025250242,0.000030405388,0.020468006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959578,0.0011834032,0.001526929,0.000020521347,0.00030534007,0.000064617976,0.00013577983,0.000013250498,0.00079237064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945203,0.00093524595,0.0015781391,0.00086513255,0.0013167054,0.0007844712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940815,0.0020790314,0.002492227,0.00022887204,0.00085888355,0.00025946827],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00123837,0.00071153074,0.0014357005,0.00018759801,0.008434484,0.00016597396,0.00041700888,0.0004069036,0.00110044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069880986,0.00055674376,0.00022592515,0.000429318,0.023975834,0.00041541716,0.00019636028,0.00083204993,5.0961955e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004171997,0.00005486615,0.021704847,0.0004895231,0.0012301101,0.000016200793,0.15796518,0.00037337746,0.0002816575,0.81434023,0.00012129434,0.0030055004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048799324,0.00015698497,0.014157925,0.0008396666,0.0012249883,0.0009287331,0.95577234,0.00032719964,0.0026356394,0.013660232,0.0036754117,0.0017409225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8443266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88798463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072585535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008823282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133116520","doi":"","title":"Asleep on the sofa: elaboratist tendencies of the Supreme Court of Canada in its Charter jurisprudence","year":2004,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Legislation; Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.02239693570282976,"score_gpt":0.32251798468355836,"score_spread":0.3001210489807286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133116520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9554613,0.0019236328,7.8964996e-7,0.02627728,0.0015046974,0.0014881751,0.00007950558,0.00001061368,0.013253972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826596,0.0007370602,0.000012005693,0.00018252298,0.00012416777,0.00006957298,0.000008563457,0.000020304617,0.016186228],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99536073,0.0005242851,0.00075264234,0.00047973724,0.0022198532,0.00066276535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967534,0.00066733075,0.0011036737,0.00043059915,0.0009513242,0.000093676994],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083622243,0.0004809839,0.00074377353,0.000044517867,0.0011793255,0.00005733254,0.0013076604,0.00032759528,0.00041105572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015091035,0.0002718876,0.00019811121,0.0011233541,0.00086671533,0.00014468399,0.000113893584,0.0007752076,0.000010414671],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015392821,0.0003114719,0.0071144053,0.0006025276,0.00037225685,0.0000109919065,0.9482091,0.0006773325,0.0060117394,0.025617473,0.010612972,0.00030579334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055985304,0.00015377619,0.31342486,0.0019410128,0.0001702461,5.1467424e-7,0.65366066,0.000053690044,0.02340586,0.0002777978,0.0056227394,0.00072903157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81928957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97846115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30631045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011053351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029291376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133847048","doi":"10.1080/13880292.2026.2630504","title":"At Risk or in Jeopardy? Canadian Common Law Species at Risk Jurisprudence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Common law; Risk assessment; Environmental law","score_opus":0.02203624243703392,"score_gpt":0.34798976214368427,"score_spread":0.3259535197066503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133847048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6940126,0.0004989884,0.0000031693965,0.06497053,0.0012734327,0.00019510054,0.00015814252,0.000016471698,0.23887159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680019,0.0034752204,0.00019693584,0.0064509953,0.0013891583,0.000006407041,0.0000032708915,0.000010006897,0.020466117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974089,0.00035199098,0.0007094918,0.00019486329,0.00085359433,0.00048111044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979248,0.0005670696,0.00061880203,0.00012971637,0.00044100403,0.00031859404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009189719,0.00019452225,0.00038724858,0.0002527096,0.0012823669,0.00017084516,0.0008515,0.00014283556,0.0005135358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013838861,0.00014835756,0.00022221613,0.00042817017,0.00068682054,0.0004605362,0.00022862628,0.00049793255,0.0000899056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023412787,0.00008508238,0.4395985,0.000008678611,0.00031282386,0.000098955104,0.01252753,0.00025562488,0.000024893674,0.47235844,0.074030675,0.00046467278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005798489,0.00003490795,0.18991093,0.00012219565,0.000032302447,0.000009778686,0.0014321445,0.000015631833,0.00005281284,0.0037189424,0.8039404,0.00015012006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83792675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97711253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7299097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057893586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006323174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99802727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7134742971","doi":"","title":"Oldest Profession or Oldest Oppression?: Addressing Prostitution after the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in &lt;i&gt;Canada v. Bedford&lt;/i&gt;","year":2014,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legislation; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.02073868273726672,"score_gpt":0.2778134712254934,"score_spread":0.2570747884882267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7134742971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97223324,0.0040191454,0.000055169214,0.008334963,0.0046330094,0.002996121,0.00017901332,0.00006281303,0.0074865534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992854,0.00044699098,0.00044780746,0.000918087,0.0009027341,0.0003048372,0.000024058154,0.000059095804,0.0040423707],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99007267,0.001616958,0.0017920784,0.0011918735,0.0035183472,0.0018080632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99466395,0.0017391971,0.0010223908,0.00093343225,0.00084380293,0.0007971956],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002775883,0.00086749485,0.0011926215,0.00008064747,0.004118193,0.00037596218,0.0014710369,0.0005828969,0.0012813988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038389561,0.0005464071,0.00022338949,0.0011530176,0.0015971196,0.0011629928,0.00081595534,0.0011260667,0.000027845852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01192279,0.0034456933,0.15683328,0.0043074046,0.0011777955,0.00083147525,0.07320329,0.006651403,0.066894785,0.08820436,0.5333368,0.05319091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037068771,0.00030064723,0.24809545,0.009802336,0.00025618638,0.000011751208,0.008150153,0.0015770611,0.0024546727,0.0006918967,0.7228961,0.0020568634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95583063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99949634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18955927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032740172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006137548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139460115","doi":"","title":"State and society : Canadian social, political and legal thought","year":2012,"lang":"pl","type":"book","venue":"Jagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Legislation","score_opus":0.015535059980704967,"score_gpt":0.21772315166672093,"score_spread":0.20218809168601595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139460115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075306356,0.0011787231,0.000026664933,0.009603755,0.0016280323,0.0015492372,0.000650678,0.00032713555,0.9097294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29591596,0.0020485073,0.00032791172,0.00035789015,0.0009831595,4.453068e-7,0.00004023195,0.000086474276,0.7002394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991645,0.0012214163,0.00060424017,0.002020246,0.0011150375,0.0033940675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99374443,0.00050591346,0.0006972789,0.0006197535,0.0006833924,0.003749252],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061859936,0.0015005417,0.001643591,0.0007420191,0.011739006,0.0007089518,0.001411655,0.0021769844,0.00024340503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005319155,0.0018620241,0.00093316106,0.0011275453,0.006922139,0.0020991482,0.0013631552,0.0024290401,0.00016511834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005252406,0.00059750857,0.058935758,0.0013838463,0.0057650176,0.010547896,0.10579815,0.000007607013,0.00034232755,0.7401628,0.07288447,0.0030493971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013886311,0.00013852892,0.01744266,0.00021349131,0.0014981799,0.00009077483,0.06664313,0.000032025735,0.000029761928,0.000046398793,0.9104379,0.002038531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29354277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.124283426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83755344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008344586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033919415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139602313","doi":"","title":"Know Your Rights","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Disadvantaged; Viewpoints; Economic Justice; Human rights; Fundamental rights","score_opus":0.03589935556723269,"score_gpt":0.281835869759516,"score_spread":0.24593651419228332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139602313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9036754,0.015481472,0.000028255325,0.010341361,0.0031962642,0.00086127606,0.00024736745,0.00041721694,0.065751396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8965287,0.0018825888,0.00048181406,0.00007018698,0.00074401806,9.5056896e-7,0.000025335046,0.000046525634,0.10021983],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99352425,0.0009985899,0.00055401033,0.0014854713,0.001966502,0.0014711679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970452,0.00053540454,0.00037788076,0.00064852147,0.00059208,0.0008008717],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019248544,0.00074816676,0.0010299945,0.00042457902,0.005723726,0.00043252157,0.0019141008,0.0010456042,0.010753351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027586514,0.0008098826,0.001116703,0.002231236,0.0028053287,0.0030843033,0.0011755397,0.0016106036,0.004913659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012335642,0.0014767672,0.069927506,0.002480636,0.006307,0.0023095866,0.7388614,0.000084009705,0.010441469,0.06979907,0.057588495,0.039490536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013126413,0.0002827408,0.089158654,0.0012932202,0.0009922405,0.000013819022,0.044388257,0.00013857607,0.0006258748,0.0036987842,0.8566303,0.0014648385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073242416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008808407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79904187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001492782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042361266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7144930701","doi":"","title":"Principles of Fundamental Justice under Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2016,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Economic Justice; Fundamental rights; Human rights","score_opus":0.03582596644106721,"score_gpt":0.27963496128792414,"score_spread":0.24380899484685692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7144930701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794384,0.0007535375,0.000035478693,0.0018144017,0.005523953,0.00047339385,0.0022401293,0.000013272037,0.00970741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975382,0.00012402094,0.0001774757,0.000028009175,0.00088076276,0.000011811846,0.000022723174,0.0000061546593,0.0012108227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763834,0.0001817509,0.0006182182,0.00032723125,0.00092197146,0.0003124807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981249,0.0002894034,0.00052255427,0.0003050632,0.00057336624,0.00018470986],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003836886,0.00021211448,0.00032899584,0.000063222615,0.0018664103,0.000044012977,0.00031891503,0.00016863947,0.00007016422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046618065,0.00012179515,0.00012351797,0.0003079634,0.004990221,0.00067575916,0.00024048799,0.0001486694,0.0000039303077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023055608,0.00038158102,0.06996248,0.0007294256,0.0008605803,0.000017562692,0.028796112,0.00007686776,0.06980997,0.8270809,0.0018148422,0.0002391252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025165416,0.0003166194,0.6370901,0.003670314,0.0012218716,0.00006156557,0.014890818,0.000051951745,0.061163265,0.00085904135,0.27720353,0.000954405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58526474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.593298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8262218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078681676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082772964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7145152657","doi":"","title":"Intervention in Rules on Membership of Religious Communities: A Study Based on Canadian Constitution","year":2018,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Intervention (counseling); Subject (documents); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.04778148550437019,"score_gpt":0.32782801464846223,"score_spread":0.28004652914409206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7145152657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.932014,0.00038347355,0.000023767381,0.0011486353,0.0053906217,0.0016232248,0.0015686804,0.00008075048,0.05776687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977043,0.00008350287,0.00018102069,0.00025353555,0.0010181735,0.000111541594,0.00048596106,0.000015026846,0.00014688441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950987,0.0011291885,0.0010432068,0.0005778639,0.0014696238,0.00068142015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969335,0.0007135594,0.0004634036,0.00070519414,0.0008651432,0.0003191752],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015920632,0.00047163837,0.0005858489,0.00045988688,0.0027851327,0.00022919454,0.0006899455,0.00026912347,0.00017618165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017538661,0.0004452803,0.00021234156,0.00085887837,0.00435433,0.0007020885,0.00017571582,0.00063033646,0.00016308305],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0046920986,0.012206865,0.23629491,0.0009426686,0.0011920397,0.001174933,0.35092026,0.0028607901,0.00036796578,0.3739687,0.013787264,0.0015914914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015107644,0.010628382,0.1845527,0.019992711,0.00091081625,0.00004474588,0.5503295,0.003954298,0.0036504692,0.0008648087,0.20585668,0.004107266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87192696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8742761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3731039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031955875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015730484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7145193610","doi":"","title":"The Significance and Possibility of Constitutional Law with Multicultural Clause : Multiculturalism in Canada from the Perspective of Human Rights Theory and Cases","year":2011,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Human rights; Perspective (graphical); Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; International human rights law","score_opus":0.03118598189484609,"score_gpt":0.28037132783918495,"score_spread":0.24918534594433886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7145193610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902726,0.0035173348,0.0000031547208,0.00044486442,0.0006041596,0.0008759527,0.0023501026,0.000013162556,0.0019186765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991108,0.0001465562,0.00028387134,0.000043234784,0.00023735479,0.000048507733,0.00006422382,0.000005022496,0.000060404895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663705,0.0007403618,0.00070846267,0.0006154102,0.0009134296,0.00038527854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99494463,0.0029853352,0.0005041449,0.0003689246,0.0010381761,0.0001587963],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006759962,0.00036775848,0.00047509273,0.000015973725,0.0041641816,0.00010509474,0.00041090298,0.000106577936,0.000021260776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001063457,0.00018003873,0.00006928321,0.00026558238,0.021507083,0.0007686889,0.00026754738,0.00039497166,5.2205985e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076659315,0.00014968036,0.028661942,0.000043882923,0.00036496422,0.0001166664,0.069214016,0.000010686753,0.0012709169,0.89928705,0.00010043367,0.000013170536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025720971,0.0002887484,0.59836817,0.0011916856,0.0005622487,0.00010211015,0.37658057,0.000035073757,0.010230392,0.004121708,0.004969404,0.0009778019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99494433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8951653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011252348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010479252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99713224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7145531593","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review over Welfare and Health Claims under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (2)","year":2008,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Judicial review; Welfare rights; Welfare; Health claims on food labels","score_opus":0.046128172409596276,"score_gpt":0.3155112033623595,"score_spread":0.2693830309527632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7145531593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43481794,0.30768764,0.00002791905,0.22068444,0.010080291,0.004018153,0.005010771,0.00012204073,0.017550817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97308624,0.022901848,0.00012087209,0.0018843776,0.0014763875,0.000034395434,0.00016321016,0.000010135961,0.00032252254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687654,0.00028446488,0.0006697067,0.00052967324,0.0010643476,0.00057525025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824595,0.00014257334,0.0003619438,0.00034401234,0.000388456,0.00051705446],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007260756,0.000335602,0.00058589224,0.000055145203,0.010161388,0.00011934648,0.00030519604,0.00016428682,0.00012574955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017136028,0.00022667562,0.000108458924,0.00040483964,0.0055339905,0.0007266672,0.00022132372,0.00040580446,0.000012933409],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008635106,0.00025172508,0.018174486,0.0019223355,0.0008412653,0.0003007084,0.041836835,0.000010588697,0.00006375952,0.76047444,0.17531589,0.00072158943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006514428,0.00010263505,0.18553811,0.0024549982,0.00018327184,0.00017847262,0.0024166235,0.000014226826,0.000026118985,0.00045736975,0.8074382,0.00053855614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8697402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75512666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7600171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008301696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013692427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99717236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7145812119","doi":"","title":"Multiculturalism : A Research from a Constitutional Viewpoint - With the Canadian Constitutional Law as an Instance","year":2005,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Constitutional law; Constitutional court; Constitution; Constitutional economics; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.06572324999421653,"score_gpt":0.35509031935439045,"score_spread":0.2893670693601739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7145812119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41687515,0.016914733,0.00033111012,0.23049551,0.011926938,0.0074909227,0.03574283,0.0006283208,0.27959448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821482,0.0002335458,0.002705299,0.0038671547,0.006640154,0.00054161245,0.0022527187,0.00002283695,0.0015885341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886341,0.0016586304,0.0009823843,0.0016133523,0.00533343,0.0017780714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99281925,0.001059941,0.00041587313,0.00095133117,0.0033564444,0.0013971359],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023862082,0.00080613024,0.00068414555,0.00017827374,0.037210897,0.001748739,0.0017471086,0.00042238503,0.0005520008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011266737,0.00056252297,0.00023988941,0.0014480662,0.059715737,0.0035973308,0.00068685965,0.002378775,0.0007780895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032005802,0.00037389467,0.0002883886,0.000024231576,0.00042157056,0.00047763955,0.023580065,0.0014304036,0.00041529347,0.9585907,0.0139468135,0.00013093783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013894986,0.00016129718,0.0010719371,0.00048602835,0.00017543286,0.00030783997,0.020968689,0.000244534,0.00035046498,0.0007070687,0.97317547,0.00096174603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8139249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91391087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95922863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008298663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012633807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7146066015","doi":"","title":"Judicial Reviewover Welfare and Health Care Claims under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1)","year":2006,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Welfare rights; Health care; Welfare; Legislation; Health insurance","score_opus":0.023702782040211635,"score_gpt":0.29545784144136467,"score_spread":0.271755059401153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7146066015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5239465,0.21600297,0.000042759755,0.17260908,0.014203426,0.0047054375,0.010220748,0.00016016595,0.058108862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99503475,0.0010865257,0.00018839577,0.0006258378,0.002399723,0.000031924363,0.00034816103,0.000010957385,0.0002737082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696386,0.00026248334,0.0006656705,0.0005579184,0.0009555206,0.0005945188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983302,0.00011621595,0.00035353782,0.00033701913,0.00051338016,0.00034968293],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052789773,0.00034950415,0.0005175237,0.00006260359,0.008432867,0.0002911681,0.00029602434,0.00019966306,0.000054685366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000082758066,0.0002396973,0.00010661582,0.00035547733,0.0040005906,0.000658,0.00021378843,0.00037252222,0.000009915583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004614345,0.00008760105,0.0073575587,0.0004793087,0.000240315,0.00006391972,0.025873778,0.000023811586,0.00004567495,0.9248108,0.04043659,0.0005344858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062300096,0.00009258384,0.10400467,0.0006890826,0.0001701322,0.000037685633,0.012112145,0.000010371403,0.000049423266,0.0010046972,0.88070583,0.00050034485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94337267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93824553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92380613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012397775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010408727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7146329243","doi":"","title":"<Notes> Notwithstanding Mechanism of Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2017,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Charter; Human rights; Legislation; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.04256486244438454,"score_gpt":0.2951868055910083,"score_spread":0.2526219431466238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7146329243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9344186,0.0020734651,0.00021286495,0.004148167,0.010203965,0.0010234427,0.005389077,0.000048078215,0.042482343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968423,0.00039749336,0.0010621882,0.00002705393,0.0011317634,0.000013886711,0.00007051151,0.00001087446,0.00044389482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715513,0.00011111601,0.0006519441,0.00052296,0.001014532,0.00054429594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972472,0.00024116781,0.00075147947,0.00064630806,0.0006596703,0.00045416108],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059128954,0.0003304447,0.00057729194,0.00020712412,0.0061311335,0.00030602916,0.0006733209,0.00024686093,0.00008446076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001451069,0.0002802922,0.00013952143,0.0002633574,0.004239912,0.0015062615,0.00038516673,0.00027173827,0.0000126303685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000960653,0.00011751661,0.008917653,0.00026842984,0.0004674152,0.00017404316,0.02781607,0.0000063786974,0.00983407,0.95081794,0.0013257404,0.00015865042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007977616,0.0010618712,0.17393415,0.010294472,0.0021876623,0.00021722942,0.030555736,0.0007290591,0.16477853,0.020578587,0.5824842,0.0052009304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8774786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55695665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9302394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049690076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068055966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7146357267","doi":"","title":"Religious Freedom of Hutterite in Canada ： Religious Institutionalism and Legal Pluralism","year":2021,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious freedom; Religious pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Freedom of religion; Legal pluralism; Institutionalism","score_opus":0.015436925973886677,"score_gpt":0.26201559154547,"score_spread":0.2465786655715833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7146357267","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9516028,0.023232372,0.000017758844,0.00792388,0.008200459,0.00051687134,0.0027617405,0.000053648982,0.0056904336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986309,0.009214345,0.0012550189,0.00046590774,0.0014917527,0.000047086487,0.0006044624,0.000021022197,0.0005914099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99440795,0.00038933152,0.0013578888,0.0010233202,0.0020110223,0.00081045745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99695045,0.00048326416,0.00049577473,0.0005659652,0.0011060158,0.00039855848],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047235796,0.0005555256,0.0008766226,0.00011120133,0.001517917,0.0002803645,0.0005054933,0.0002755874,0.00004896178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020204508,0.0005578528,0.00017079808,0.0010552506,0.0026029379,0.0013395326,0.00077076623,0.00067831733,0.000011803439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009370737,0.0013576737,0.12649277,0.0019329449,0.001878096,0.031121058,0.059288517,0.004273827,0.019582244,0.64333206,0.10841257,0.0013911418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002797078,0.00008339442,0.04894355,0.0023916366,0.0002866609,0.0008384571,0.0207074,0.00018555971,0.0041693146,0.0003749636,0.9175149,0.0017070627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98553264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9662028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80910236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032542634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010478442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7146616356","doi":"","title":"The Significance and Possibility of Constitutional Law with Multicultural Clause (2) : Multiculturalism in Canada from the Perspective of Human Rights Theory","year":2012,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Human rights; Perspective (graphical); Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Constitutional economics","score_opus":0.021023202444698685,"score_gpt":0.2832862232163707,"score_spread":0.262263020771672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7146616356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.985791,0.005297082,0.000006486773,0.0011460811,0.001442765,0.001057694,0.002548252,0.000016603271,0.0026939814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985351,0.00009541961,0.00027494578,0.000060197795,0.000736983,0.00006467071,0.00012562804,0.0000063014395,0.000100757105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99574775,0.0008549993,0.00085104443,0.0005481337,0.0013884418,0.0006096533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945065,0.0029853093,0.00062397524,0.0004700149,0.0011911913,0.0002230218],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096261164,0.00041831532,0.00053487165,0.000016748112,0.0048499103,0.00012549943,0.00057124614,0.00013048359,0.000026841246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009687104,0.00020345273,0.00010732421,0.00038024748,0.018123204,0.0012076234,0.0002885843,0.0005315228,0.0000016943537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003530372,0.00021729949,0.04233119,0.0000397656,0.00040471996,0.000018649585,0.05460394,0.00005197109,0.0021062356,0.89960325,0.00025746232,0.000012471607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002865902,0.00014122433,0.62666434,0.0012115476,0.0006136678,0.000037983304,0.326744,0.000050755883,0.010738641,0.0021790364,0.027577855,0.0011750493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9872173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8974242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002391319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012807521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99644566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7154048727","doi":"10.3917/dhs.039.0639zm","title":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction, vol. 18, n o  4, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, 2006, p. 405-556.","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dix-huitième siècle","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Identification (biology); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.018584232665706378,"score_gpt":0.23907793797907195,"score_spread":0.22049370531336557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7154048727","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36799836,0.017842842,0.00017849571,0.0084948605,0.016419703,0.0012493345,0.0005165338,0.00022769596,0.5870722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65711796,0.0028015645,0.00021073977,0.0011251256,0.0017574164,0.0000041529474,0.00005201742,0.000047220117,0.33688378],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995121,0.0003083602,0.0006122518,0.00082348374,0.0013581467,0.0017767508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748164,0.00032090838,0.0003323854,0.0003240289,0.00083121436,0.00070983736],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075333245,0.00056517246,0.00059473055,0.00009397366,0.0030632177,0.00015110886,0.0007209589,0.00046461512,0.019077176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015422437,0.00060239044,0.00031520898,0.00092832366,0.0012656066,0.0006570754,0.00029028227,0.0007382602,0.0004996023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087124376,0.00034310148,0.039820112,0.000067721434,0.00036574685,0.0002891199,0.0248059,0.000043074215,0.00006229479,0.014805656,0.9086562,0.010653966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071673037,0.000058092057,0.15055652,0.00008395236,0.00014624816,0.0000041462863,0.018880822,0.000013483946,0.000091611684,0.00005293366,0.8287559,0.00063953793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28911963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007438931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010030186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7159961388","doi":"10.2307/jj.41749204.5","title":"CONTEXT OF CHURCH, THEOLOGY, AND SOCIETY ON THE EVE OF THE COUNCIL IN ENGLISH-SPEAKING CANADA","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Peeters Publishers eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.040452121312093366,"score_gpt":0.2353931370385382,"score_spread":0.19494101572644484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7159961388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02697324,0.0006533617,3.4913228e-7,0.0084361695,0.0019832465,0.0016006351,0.00011168208,0.000020556232,0.96022075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90992904,0.00010525985,0.000009875877,0.0027045768,0.00016944073,0.000048346094,0.0000024531662,0.000027419806,0.08700361],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945535,0.0005248532,0.0011093303,0.0007685017,0.002277157,0.00076663675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933924,0.002766648,0.0012485033,0.00062366057,0.0018395742,0.00012920181],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030166374,0.00068892504,0.0011694869,0.000051704857,0.0011443483,0.00026412314,0.0016253184,0.0006587216,0.00016288343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029278204,0.00040564046,0.0006110525,0.00015125117,0.006680924,0.00027662946,0.0008305311,0.0014594615,3.523152e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013637835,0.00004016832,0.0021918046,0.00031492396,0.0014299683,0.0000044818576,0.6452648,0.00000866198,0.000058582944,0.2729912,0.06941874,0.008140287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001891916,0.0001473891,0.006390067,0.0019158853,0.0004716924,0.0000010526292,0.2271902,0.00005412441,0.00016728284,0.0044386424,0.75613886,0.0011928914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.770075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7856787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8829558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032598395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050820047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161753316","doi":"10.82308/19193","title":"Hidden fault lines: uncovering the colonial threads underlying the characterization of religion in Canadian courts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Christianity; Colonialism; Freedom of religion; Context (archaeology); Presupposition; Spirituality; Charter","score_opus":0.031151033190281535,"score_gpt":0.3285066574328684,"score_spread":0.2973556242425869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161753316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9778636,0.0003161934,0.0000015745522,0.0063906424,0.0010749516,0.0006523963,0.000015964997,0.000022384904,0.013662281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891605,0.0015467888,0.000012990977,0.00019095957,0.00020537333,0.000056226065,0.0003730842,0.0000145839085,0.0084395055],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836916,0.00022071053,0.00034360043,0.00021928608,0.00048777187,0.0003594447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901116,0.00020533268,0.0002498016,0.00013966166,0.0003238054,0.000070264374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005479674,0.00017144208,0.00026208154,0.000056170164,0.0010105148,0.00016145021,0.00033033043,0.00028486355,0.0000711997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004699439,0.0001012819,0.00009277669,0.00041671764,0.00012178164,0.00015369919,0.000024568695,0.00029276728,0.000005828094],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114788076,0.000084637446,0.024731925,0.00029741105,0.00033167054,0.000029483093,0.89498,0.00014151589,0.010183892,0.050305948,0.0020768193,0.01672191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043059664,0.000052864816,0.69738424,0.00080138404,0.00016103698,8.811457e-7,0.21673763,0.00015616619,0.0006842472,0.0010870936,0.0817749,0.0007289765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9485898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6782424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006724588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009476025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77721643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161839726","doi":"10.82308/23099","title":"Making sense of who we are: justification, community and judgment in section 7 of the canadian charter","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Economic Justice; Doctrine; Reel","score_opus":0.07273039417326833,"score_gpt":0.339070725005214,"score_spread":0.2663403308319457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161839726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9679369,0.00016384484,2.8007648e-7,0.002421193,0.0005278539,0.0005085007,0.000015129089,0.0000061410938,0.028420212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921624,0.00016622871,0.000010190946,0.00004688782,0.000033646036,0.000011240228,0.000014222697,0.0000046398723,0.0075505204],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900216,0.00032295566,0.0002160556,0.00009360205,0.00023522697,0.00013001241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992541,0.00008714817,0.00027664824,0.0001368266,0.00021597261,0.000029315563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047230406,0.0000884988,0.00019767325,0.000054866952,0.0006477887,0.000023890037,0.00011848794,0.0001822277,0.000035577577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015018208,0.000062565734,0.000040612766,0.00018225225,0.00013457629,0.000059361166,0.000016843238,0.00028004483,0.0000014289395],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027528655,0.00006802125,0.10354002,0.00082984095,0.00010224129,3.717518e-7,0.8795711,0.000019650333,0.0007474931,0.008255351,0.0032961327,0.00354225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084224535,0.00000712522,0.7947034,0.0003229233,0.000025644289,7.1199885e-8,0.20102018,0.000011901333,0.00022202691,0.00008068218,0.003429493,0.000092307266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86003405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99574846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6911634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036043764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014819324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49823326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161843845","doi":"10.82308/10992","title":"Beyond the Courts: Rethinking Charter Review to Foster Effective and Sustainable Rights Protection in Federal Lawmaking","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Executive branch; Context (archaeology); Citizenship","score_opus":0.01747465770335359,"score_gpt":0.32672243042667437,"score_spread":0.30924777272332077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161843845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28284776,0.070035234,0.000020848416,0.09273724,0.003399794,0.032837804,0.000007059547,0.0004916678,0.5176226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81885546,0.0030773056,0.00010504125,0.0046686586,0.0009914848,0.0039367178,0.000047699334,0.0000566075,0.168261],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980004,0.00040816906,0.00026553794,0.00042278972,0.0004447707,0.0004583534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993311,0.00015792657,0.0001087306,0.0000966376,0.00024975126,0.00005586266],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001547868,0.00024429493,0.0003628237,0.00006672796,0.0017946602,0.00044180857,0.00014618886,0.00022804846,0.00007267523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030790144,0.00014057421,0.00008847575,0.0003354702,0.000077226076,0.00027123847,0.00007776934,0.0005614053,0.000036048863],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008131468,0.0000372178,0.00011602365,0.0074189105,0.00021526584,0.000057646655,0.8907552,0.0000012405393,0.000059092443,0.051509175,0.029993897,0.01975504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005178753,0.00024730916,0.008619736,0.020329934,0.00034414587,0.0000044449225,0.2734379,0.000024899628,0.00022962719,0.11259518,0.5821102,0.0015387281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022089185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13167535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61731726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005796751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050790426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161844418","doi":"10.82308/50510","title":"The value of religion according to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Freedom of religion; Normative; Charter; Value (mathematics); Autonomy; Religious freedom","score_opus":0.023725209770017335,"score_gpt":0.32026263161431684,"score_spread":0.2965374218442995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161844418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.834789,0.0008108596,0.0000022604195,0.0251902,0.0043910933,0.0013088146,0.000030432366,0.00006475456,0.13341263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9134272,0.0008362121,0.000023650902,0.000082679035,0.00019334332,0.000037340735,0.000018201057,0.000013054587,0.08536837],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983514,0.00012252138,0.00029267694,0.00013951323,0.0008391841,0.00025468014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984924,0.00071896706,0.00021760563,0.00014535691,0.0003788181,0.000046823854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007067593,0.00011332529,0.00021859031,0.000015258685,0.0011654986,0.000035102003,0.0005149454,0.00009200915,0.0000123374475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013445371,0.00005574505,0.000089359775,0.000335617,0.00008233882,0.000033285352,0.000047663238,0.00013050577,0.0000058604005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067021254,0.000014779487,0.00232334,0.00012636364,0.0003279971,0.000001461381,0.14226587,0.0002199124,0.00040287068,0.06902467,0.7812443,0.0039814343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007952469,0.00002650222,0.033842973,0.00018014555,0.00007923471,4.1972072e-8,0.755237,0.000019159439,0.0010979435,0.00062450935,0.20857635,0.00023661894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9855993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99787503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6129711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002542401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005997661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8964191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161872955","doi":"10.82308/23935","title":"Appealing to higher authority : explaining the Federal Government's appeals to the Supreme Court of Canada in charter cases","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Charter; Government (linguistics); Judicial review; Victory; Context (archaeology); Court of record; Legislation","score_opus":0.04287019622100647,"score_gpt":0.3107487260107281,"score_spread":0.26787852978972165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161872955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7882139,0.0004714747,0.000004598022,0.053031966,0.0023983996,0.0021280537,0.000103078084,0.000047983784,0.15360053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9377219,0.000034176002,0.000043859713,0.0009060794,0.00040160367,0.00013570438,0.000014010848,0.000015040113,0.060727615],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701124,0.00026701964,0.00041669828,0.0003196089,0.0014303036,0.00055513857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989466,0.000416556,0.00017852003,0.00018466618,0.00013523408,0.00013844266],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008006416,0.0002508381,0.00037420238,0.000017528331,0.0014385098,0.00013094096,0.0005248134,0.00013700115,0.0005214257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048143291,0.0001416222,0.00008673438,0.00029271818,0.000054340984,0.00008726657,0.00007129603,0.0002895443,0.000012720236],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013433644,0.00009748051,0.009627521,0.00012840325,0.00026272787,0.000036731293,0.5441984,0.00027891053,0.00016811254,0.00800538,0.43079445,0.006267531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021493832,0.000052752875,0.11338587,0.0002783557,0.000044930264,4.4852408e-7,0.5276878,0.00002388401,0.0002044439,0.000032572065,0.35750186,0.0005721393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90888953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14950798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010583311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018305033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161958684","doi":"10.82308/15659","title":"Section 515 (10) (c) Criminal Code: At the intersection of the media, judicial legitimacy and the rule of law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial interpretation; Context (archaeology); Judicial review; Judicial opinion; Judicial activism; Public opinion; Supreme court","score_opus":0.04126500395542977,"score_gpt":0.3444769249472973,"score_spread":0.30321192099186756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161958684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.609202,0.0003707346,0.0000015340097,0.0024778738,0.0030071589,0.0007428057,0.000029285095,0.000020852916,0.38414773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9626259,0.0001987115,0.0000058631967,0.0000670098,0.00065865397,0.000046532194,0.000023794046,0.000009280771,0.036364254],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984247,0.00032110472,0.00029484316,0.00019388433,0.0005942683,0.00017121517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983379,0.00043823195,0.00063249806,0.00021265513,0.0003513748,0.000027295815],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007525979,0.00016185497,0.00030722943,0.000013255501,0.002837363,0.00008017078,0.00042580772,0.0002012528,0.00036453435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074839307,0.00006933262,0.00020761655,0.0000719432,0.002430932,0.00014979237,0.00008757051,0.0002648693,0.000005658861],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001223651,0.00007771705,0.000531475,0.0002238448,0.00043669593,5.2056544e-7,0.85085666,0.00000513933,0.0012270131,0.119486,0.013558844,0.012372436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030540747,0.000149209,0.14504112,0.00061349815,0.0019834545,0.000004491658,0.6703531,0.00006984374,0.010948779,0.010623591,0.1564109,0.00074789335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15273279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49979988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35342386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017590249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000814666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161967125","doi":"10.82308/44220","title":"Perfect strangers: The social dimension of the law's interaction with religion in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Dialectic; Dimension (graph theory); Context (archaeology); Face (sociological concept); Social relation","score_opus":0.014784700515579235,"score_gpt":0.2959897418909913,"score_spread":0.2812050413754121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161967125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93059474,0.000111463276,1.14975556e-7,0.002410747,0.0009142327,0.00059903995,0.0000042649644,0.00000938829,0.065355994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99529284,0.00008390468,0.0000035600585,0.00012455572,0.00008860884,0.000017479337,0.00002022448,0.000009002394,0.0043598306],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986011,0.00023902982,0.00019113485,0.00016626103,0.0006159896,0.00018650839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932617,0.00017168553,0.00023971344,0.00009488586,0.00015121342,0.000016348078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020009355,0.00013921963,0.00021263186,0.000012822521,0.00068608916,0.00002974859,0.0002245552,0.00011719023,0.000054115222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005004776,0.000062831255,0.00007710363,0.00019412978,0.00011168208,0.00010237057,0.000017889739,0.000325504,0.0000029785367],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00084396487,0.00013293783,0.030399218,0.00042216983,0.0004477934,0.0000056925714,0.8837604,0.0002521987,0.0015683012,0.045042787,0.02957124,0.0075532757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039134233,0.000046394594,0.14335074,0.00039891608,0.00011187168,2.7727467e-7,0.84135926,0.000019776311,0.0009005323,0.00006931813,0.013014008,0.0003375866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9970748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99978256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11295152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010046103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006906237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52769125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161980459","doi":"10.82308/41983","title":"Lessons from India's constitutional culture: what Canada can learn","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Ideology; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Economic Justice; Social rights","score_opus":0.02414725801966782,"score_gpt":0.3119593719998607,"score_spread":0.28781211398019285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161980459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22672106,0.013071561,0.000005950939,0.03972439,0.018389978,0.0023251122,0.0008146232,0.00040088483,0.6985464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66787803,0.0041661584,0.00019682093,0.001293725,0.0011573231,0.00014203765,0.0039619296,0.0000187698,0.3211852],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977289,0.00013464566,0.00026432556,0.00042035067,0.0009927587,0.00045906217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885255,0.00015149957,0.0002023033,0.00012150731,0.00043294774,0.00023921017],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009995915,0.00030220047,0.0003708278,0.000024275423,0.0017604541,0.00051177264,0.00038375417,0.00044102085,0.0035228038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030445267,0.00023525885,0.00011007555,0.00016599351,0.0005581914,0.0004238107,0.0000322104,0.0004601229,0.00012716671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015042391,0.000058605998,0.0016179549,0.000042423497,0.00063030916,0.000026593138,0.1136891,0.000008493713,0.00013775137,0.19154574,0.68164086,0.010587089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014789197,0.000005212414,0.014217527,0.00011032845,0.000065938344,1.4307788e-7,0.2987547,8.382707e-7,0.0001337957,0.00052231434,0.68557733,0.0004639493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9934089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44115695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012008118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031104086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162024931","doi":"10.82308/54621","title":"What we have yet failed to achieve: a study of Charles Taylor's Canadian social criticism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Identity (music); Context (archaeology); Social criticism; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.032751890935481046,"score_gpt":0.35497800738746493,"score_spread":0.3222261164519839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162024931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9377023,0.0002379411,3.2811639e-7,0.01263841,0.0037863299,0.0021820047,0.00006750555,0.00008005108,0.043305144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94211143,0.00019451352,0.000056467703,0.00024661532,0.00067592337,0.00023142241,0.00010247094,0.00003528901,0.056345876],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712807,0.00023580823,0.00046660518,0.0005078381,0.00094965356,0.00071201794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983336,0.00015622671,0.00020164766,0.00017779807,0.00069882325,0.0004319211],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038486157,0.00037502378,0.0007013846,0.00019503763,0.0019118184,0.00041969193,0.00061703206,0.0006542515,0.0010515265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047080003,0.0003234018,0.00017988092,0.00030253918,0.00017077259,0.0004304202,0.000050022547,0.00057431427,0.00009834031],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004759116,0.00021332742,0.0011771278,0.00006526929,0.0002017802,0.000010412101,0.97598386,2.5020648e-7,0.0001823558,0.002305382,0.008573179,0.011239467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002872252,0.00012922782,0.019795062,0.00006737667,0.00010384778,4.6271243e-8,0.9400928,6.5366294e-7,0.000083266576,0.00023429008,0.038765095,0.00044108447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82262117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17609996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004198316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003632745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162034432","doi":"10.82308/1163","title":"Comparative analysis of constitutional law mechanism for human rights protection in Canada and Russia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Ratification; Right to property; Constitution; Convention; Linguistic rights","score_opus":0.03747680261120276,"score_gpt":0.3376061120613846,"score_spread":0.3001293094501818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162034432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93288505,0.00006279553,0.00013094439,0.0001579798,0.00024612912,0.0016407372,0.00011542568,0.000017882749,0.06474306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981866,0.0000039320803,0.00016779125,0.000012818068,0.000025438658,0.00014012372,0.00025419245,0.000001484477,0.001207621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990411,0.000053596323,0.00025709253,0.00019749871,0.00030565716,0.000145056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994259,0.000053537813,0.00019005527,0.000035354475,0.00025379486,0.000041383046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011248829,0.00012308931,0.00043943748,0.000081465194,0.00088177604,0.00002052995,0.000066022556,0.00011665769,0.00006742757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017809612,0.00009704743,0.000074292635,0.00029888746,0.00027737883,0.00007775532,0.0000054387488,0.000093833,2.487463e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012371041,0.000014411866,0.000111055335,0.000025655954,0.0003774723,3.6331514e-7,0.008703737,0.00004503178,0.00010377068,0.9905853,0.00001297359,0.000007832467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004560009,0.00030582334,0.21446961,0.000798742,0.006283719,5.1776686e-7,0.27921468,0.00074095494,0.021136645,0.45701283,0.012537612,0.002938832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9988962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5335725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010841133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005691222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6781997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162035074","doi":"10.82308/12572","title":"Tomber entre les mailles du filet:L'Injustice administrative substantive en droit social Québécois","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Social rights; Administrative law; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.02825063636421184,"score_gpt":0.3231759277491274,"score_spread":0.2949252913849156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162035074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69017506,0.0034759245,0.000033893302,0.009163015,0.0023873446,0.0010258656,0.00045457156,0.0001768521,0.2931075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8364077,0.002844397,0.0005408086,0.00024144797,0.0023652914,0.00014845596,0.00094825285,0.00006272293,0.15644093],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.994451,0.0011549989,0.0008735409,0.0011302447,0.0013420269,0.0010481889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957272,0.0017147925,0.00069953495,0.00016701067,0.0014130975,0.0002783759],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042548595,0.00092892785,0.0011956713,0.000064965534,0.0038000203,0.0003498691,0.00060549733,0.0012487039,0.019327218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011974056,0.0008562821,0.0007639582,0.00084285974,0.0012535026,0.00047882777,0.00014178126,0.00091198005,0.00057761674],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011627633,0.00035962954,0.0030654534,0.00027813137,0.0011208019,0.00013030115,0.7647286,0.0000030962824,0.00024833865,0.21092847,0.011133846,0.0078870375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004238054,0.00008782239,0.04495469,0.00022134214,0.0007348848,0.000002515887,0.866712,0.000019201545,0.00070160127,0.0003259165,0.084779866,0.0010364013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2186932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7273904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5086972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015064797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010015649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162700861","doi":"","title":"Freedom of Expression in Canada ―Focusing on Judicial Review Framework―","year":2017,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expression (computer science); Judicial review; Freedom of expression; Legislation","score_opus":0.04204553658292317,"score_gpt":0.32954094888915403,"score_spread":0.2874954123062309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162700861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7539065,0.086054094,0.00021365387,0.029647138,0.056153152,0.004042135,0.0050603575,0.00012839073,0.06479459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830622,0.011966288,0.0013036478,0.00032767034,0.0030308152,0.00004319313,0.00009151862,0.000016202936,0.00015843027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99523497,0.0003147811,0.0010175175,0.00069534825,0.0021159071,0.00062145863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965566,0.0005902548,0.001092109,0.0009989477,0.0005122983,0.0002498332],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074740726,0.00041661086,0.0008303527,0.00005439089,0.0043905494,0.00021878179,0.0011330004,0.00022051291,0.00013255376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009136444,0.0003616696,0.00016790221,0.00027977268,0.0018840889,0.0012353791,0.00069815153,0.00075397245,0.000020552176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002116874,0.0029005767,0.30080587,0.0145288985,0.0013568266,0.0052224486,0.03841341,0.0018990115,0.016547939,0.41016495,0.19099262,0.015050586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025916572,0.0002626529,0.21778226,0.18292841,0.0005852911,0.00003503151,0.010468782,0.00014340741,0.012388623,0.00087718485,0.5689034,0.0030333272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9764782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9257324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40928775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028178592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039660684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164254677","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review over Welfare and Health Claims under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (2)","year":2008,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Judicial review; Welfare rights; Welfare; Health claims on food labels","score_opus":0.046128172409596276,"score_gpt":0.3155112033623595,"score_spread":0.2693830309527632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164254677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43481794,0.30768764,0.00002791905,0.22068444,0.010080291,0.004018153,0.005010771,0.00012204073,0.017550817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97308624,0.022901848,0.00012087209,0.0018843776,0.0014763875,0.000034395434,0.00016321016,0.000010135961,0.00032252254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687654,0.00028446488,0.0006697067,0.00052967324,0.0010643476,0.00057525025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824595,0.00014257334,0.0003619438,0.00034401234,0.000388456,0.00051705446],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007260756,0.000335602,0.00058589224,0.000055145203,0.010161388,0.00011934648,0.00030519604,0.00016428682,0.00012574955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017136028,0.00022667562,0.000108458924,0.00040483964,0.0055339905,0.0007266672,0.00022132372,0.00040580446,0.000012933409],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008635106,0.00025172508,0.018174486,0.0019223355,0.0008412653,0.0003007084,0.041836835,0.000010588697,0.00006375952,0.76047444,0.17531589,0.00072158943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006514428,0.00010263505,0.18553811,0.0024549982,0.00018327184,0.00017847262,0.0024166235,0.000014226826,0.000026118985,0.00045736975,0.8074382,0.00053855614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8697402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75512666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7600171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008301696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013692427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99717236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164257524","doi":"","title":"Judicial Reviewover Welfare and Health Care Claims under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1)","year":2006,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Welfare rights; Health care; Welfare; Legislation; Health insurance","score_opus":0.023702782040211635,"score_gpt":0.29545784144136467,"score_spread":0.271755059401153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164257524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5239465,0.21600297,0.000042759755,0.17260908,0.014203426,0.0047054375,0.010220748,0.00016016595,0.058108862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99503475,0.0010865257,0.00018839577,0.0006258378,0.002399723,0.000031924363,0.00034816103,0.000010957385,0.0002737082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696386,0.00026248334,0.0006656705,0.0005579184,0.0009555206,0.0005945188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983302,0.00011621595,0.00035353782,0.00033701913,0.00051338016,0.00034968293],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052789773,0.00034950415,0.0005175237,0.00006260359,0.008432867,0.0002911681,0.00029602434,0.00019966306,0.000054685366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000082758066,0.0002396973,0.00010661582,0.00035547733,0.0040005906,0.000658,0.00021378843,0.00037252222,0.000009915583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004614345,0.00008760105,0.0073575587,0.0004793087,0.000240315,0.00006391972,0.025873778,0.000023811586,0.00004567495,0.9248108,0.04043659,0.0005344858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062300096,0.00009258384,0.10400467,0.0006890826,0.0001701322,0.000037685633,0.012112145,0.000010371403,0.000049423266,0.0010046972,0.88070583,0.00050034485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94337267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93824553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92380613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012397775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010408727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164267570","doi":"","title":"Principles of Fundamental Justice under Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2016,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Economic Justice; Fundamental rights; Human rights","score_opus":0.03582596644106721,"score_gpt":0.27963496128792414,"score_spread":0.24380899484685692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164267570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794384,0.0007535375,0.000035478693,0.0018144017,0.005523953,0.00047339385,0.0022401293,0.000013272037,0.00970741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975382,0.00012402094,0.0001774757,0.000028009175,0.00088076276,0.000011811846,0.000022723174,0.0000061546593,0.0012108227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763834,0.0001817509,0.0006182182,0.00032723125,0.00092197146,0.0003124807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981249,0.0002894034,0.00052255427,0.0003050632,0.00057336624,0.00018470986],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003836886,0.00021211448,0.00032899584,0.000063222615,0.0018664103,0.000044012977,0.00031891503,0.00016863947,0.00007016422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046618065,0.00012179515,0.00012351797,0.0003079634,0.004990221,0.00067575916,0.00024048799,0.0001486694,0.0000039303077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023055608,0.00038158102,0.06996248,0.0007294256,0.0008605803,0.000017562692,0.028796112,0.00007686776,0.06980997,0.8270809,0.0018148422,0.0002391252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025165416,0.0003166194,0.6370901,0.003670314,0.0012218716,0.00006156557,0.014890818,0.000051951745,0.061163265,0.00085904135,0.27720353,0.000954405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58526474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.593298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8262218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078681676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082772964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W71647670","doi":"","title":"What You Should Know About Divorce In Ontario","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.10728310649979529,"score_gpt":0.32467079475612953,"score_spread":0.21738768825633425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W71647670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54205817,0.00081434794,0.0000061900473,0.0022995425,0.0011616165,0.00026594926,3.4683123e-7,0.00010714838,0.4532867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9033836,0.0006571671,0.0004566272,0.00033347693,0.000087425804,0.00002192052,8.3060115e-7,0.0000056633958,0.095053285],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988503,0.00007916532,0.00016878093,0.00021421007,0.00030006684,0.00038751436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996274,0.00006594573,0.00003933372,0.00010308865,0.00006444072,0.000099782184],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003326642,0.000111920985,0.00016273175,0.000024034473,0.000381358,0.0001178212,0.0002493576,0.00011312756,0.004022681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012396059,0.00008236866,0.000063762236,0.00014684905,0.00026687002,0.0007957852,0.00009381851,0.00019958348,0.0002769946],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013059534,0.00010329309,0.3433928,0.0000037853465,0.000025514422,0.000009653631,0.61507696,8.2514975e-7,0.000019164434,0.02879081,0.002864768,0.009699346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022558903,0.000023639608,0.5532769,0.000048419486,0.000009324135,1.5539774e-7,0.087248996,0.0000021824349,0.000088175504,0.0008926112,0.35794204,0.00024196664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8993848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99046606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.527828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000473842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000076285476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164975677","doi":"","title":"The \"Dialogue\" Theory in the Canadian Constitution : The Relationship of the Judicial Review between the Legislature and the Judiciary","year":2007,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Constitution; Legislature; Judicial independence; Judicial activism; Legislation","score_opus":0.036098823946374196,"score_gpt":0.31039233447394293,"score_spread":0.27429351052756873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164975677","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074975014,0.26795304,0.00010784447,0.49784604,0.014900651,0.011151812,0.0021168776,0.000079817175,0.13086891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862401,0.0070680627,0.000014336213,0.0030639698,0.0032136748,0.00012288948,0.000089198715,0.000010092508,0.0001776913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99162567,0.0040551205,0.0011381801,0.0004724596,0.0019225123,0.00078606926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814688,0.015955793,0.0007735396,0.0011258558,0.00052970566,0.00014631763],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018143235,0.00041896725,0.00048051216,0.00004578479,0.024086742,0.0004939143,0.0021579303,0.0002979789,0.000012594099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015793476,0.00014325396,0.00031933974,0.0016051276,0.023382533,0.00058504177,0.00048100995,0.0019745869,0.000014271516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100404286,0.000024310379,0.02533089,0.000056202938,0.00018013474,0.000015666494,0.018789068,0.000012137094,0.0000044046187,0.9454572,0.009499484,0.0005300794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071284577,0.000026004727,0.4490524,0.0017633142,0.00081715453,0.00006273275,0.01869621,0.000006993092,0.000019028585,0.018331015,0.5101581,0.0003541489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4071499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71064425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9271262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007702252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022890293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165502841","doi":"","title":"Cronshaw Review of How (Not) To Be Secular: Reading Charles Taylor, by Smith","year":2018,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"ePlace - Preserving, Learning, and Creative Exchange (Asbury Theological Seminary)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Reading (process); Close reading","score_opus":0.033724352432142383,"score_gpt":0.32735603118533263,"score_spread":0.29363167875319024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165502841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03855298,0.17392571,0.00024862957,0.02449203,0.0003862123,0.0026191531,0.00015118063,0.00023069646,0.7593934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02952722,0.17318796,0.00051362603,0.0021265692,0.00086973904,0.00024396024,0.00004501768,0.000067584726,0.79341835],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899552,0.00408725,0.00091357453,0.0018259857,0.0014574018,0.0017605977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945267,0.001629684,0.001233092,0.000585499,0.0010895418,0.0009355001],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004016568,0.001138172,0.0020425157,0.00013600997,0.0031822848,0.0002779799,0.0014325579,0.0007762393,0.31724766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010245877,0.00087152753,0.00047625275,0.0011513163,0.0045437533,0.000753444,0.0025719306,0.0012241584,0.000090919006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003011421,0.0002238318,0.0029975548,0.0022620286,0.0002864961,0.000025039064,0.069451936,5.012735e-7,0.0014930925,0.00076526555,0.9214211,0.00077202136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005893018,0.0039307266,0.0018998029,0.0056223786,0.00035336954,0.0000089083405,0.03739344,0.00004413599,0.0018455961,0.00016553659,0.94707245,0.001074367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027650732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021306527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31715673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035934072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008085495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99937356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7203669","doi":"","title":"Evolving Capacities: The B.C. Representative for Children and Youth as a Hybrid Model of Oversight","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Government (linguistics); Foster care; Political science; Welfare; Representation (politics); Public administration; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.027184314241676832,"score_gpt":0.28136721749544474,"score_spread":0.2541829032537679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7203669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.975205,0.0007664402,0.0000946886,0.0019532202,0.00009484444,0.0012368708,0.0001572555,0.00004932652,0.020442378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953246,0.000109652814,0.0007620082,0.00035200553,0.00017070497,0.000082078564,0.000008779581,0.00001030701,0.0031798312],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987807,0.00012346361,0.00019442155,0.00024848134,0.00033509964,0.00031783443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990477,0.0002904577,0.00013297122,0.00016154461,0.00024492622,0.00012239865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030424763,0.00013293157,0.0002122722,0.0000142440695,0.0011501531,0.00013046677,0.0002529188,0.0000531744,0.00016880651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006547456,0.00008803806,0.000101707126,0.00008014297,0.0011088649,0.00057181035,0.00010714653,0.00013613571,0.000024055002],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059941878,0.000096257914,0.0124884145,0.000046533274,0.00054774614,7.263293e-7,0.67541796,0.00032205085,0.0009706791,0.2614763,0.0480189,0.0005544754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036822308,0.00033575433,0.04625481,0.00026725384,0.0004626851,0.0000041567027,0.829316,0.0038293093,0.0058272504,0.10381289,0.004689973,0.0015176445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1463093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031105636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15766342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009374744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004951163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88461643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W73375900","doi":"","title":"Changing the Line of Succession to the Crown","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Commonwealth; Legislation; Kingdom; Queen (butterfly); Ecological succession; House of Commons; Law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Sovereignty; State (computer science); Prime minister; Parliament; Public administration; History; Politics","score_opus":0.039198502016569804,"score_gpt":0.3153684373928854,"score_spread":0.27616993537631557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W73375900","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07029219,0.19151011,0.000007211553,0.7191207,0.0007610541,0.0047408347,0.00004408796,0.00003359739,0.013490213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88890076,0.047291134,0.00009686747,0.05953501,0.0005549438,0.00037437273,0.000010458454,0.000012772166,0.0032236944],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988392,0.00020567267,0.00020469759,0.00012657711,0.00023366409,0.00039015984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992791,0.000088610526,0.0000753039,0.00019770325,0.00010029894,0.00025900867],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006703893,0.00009432444,0.00018776815,0.00002522609,0.0010323507,0.000046214118,0.0004701996,0.000025366828,0.0021068042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018646858,0.0000449625,0.00008098489,0.00046516373,0.00017442428,0.000120989556,0.00005663793,0.000094682226,0.0003407211],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013492545,0.000013332765,0.003601763,0.00037254408,0.000080582984,0.0000028919876,0.032317266,0.000006012787,0.000025018577,0.0010726883,0.6956401,0.26686645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027347407,0.000010579173,0.002705912,0.0007989352,0.000031085026,2.905245e-7,0.010759847,0.0000023872274,0.000013747101,0.00002482519,0.98554295,0.00008211292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73347795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75069696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8186086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002613794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012705596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W751313829","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2821","title":"Substantive Equality As Equal Recognition: A New Theory of Section 15 of the Charter","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.13256272786081788,"score_gpt":0.34198915064985225,"score_spread":0.20942642278903437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W751313829","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31876686,0.00070440216,0.000482237,0.0034433722,0.0017349165,0.0003247833,0.000021793148,0.000030925177,0.6744907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977486,0.00007057804,0.00016111911,0.00013489684,0.0008592473,0.0000021723863,9.491158e-7,0.0000064503874,0.0010159459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762374,0.0009716302,0.00035313325,0.00010261447,0.00071497704,0.00023391753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850315,0.0001785457,0.00044564818,0.000100060985,0.00059843704,0.00017415186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021459376,0.00010454054,0.00022182522,0.000016408581,0.0006765344,0.000050225597,0.00025233827,0.000111205445,0.00038156446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005726384,0.00006577954,0.00017695915,0.00018572381,0.0005324419,0.0003326783,0.00005790422,0.00031453068,0.00002451502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026680258,0.00015220705,0.0021752636,0.000017369812,0.0002314595,0.000003305936,0.16505878,0.000008258706,0.00089889206,0.8185731,0.002514857,0.010099678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019631411,0.00032539485,0.007990025,0.0002546751,0.0001841948,0.00003938748,0.1489956,0.0000036992328,0.0061954423,0.8182108,0.015480338,0.000357326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05591291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.083229475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6789818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017345214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019611325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9503738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W76022651","doi":"10.21991/c9bw82","title":"AMENDING THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06688833277426015,"score_gpt":0.2938406459485605,"score_spread":0.22695231317430037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W76022651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037532304,0.0010784907,0.007239147,0.021606136,0.004384427,0.0013651415,0.0001913829,0.00038789937,0.95999414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952474,0.000118350545,0.0010295922,0.0021382032,0.0003306441,0.00015838095,0.000046434565,0.000007919408,0.00092303415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996495,0.00022181225,0.00053687644,0.00052645215,0.0008065433,0.0014133037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803144,0.00020502803,0.00020243648,0.00034003853,0.0005922921,0.00062878046],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009404306,0.00036916346,0.00031928287,0.00021264754,0.01593085,0.0002672645,0.0007281275,0.00032109517,0.0013365932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011529509,0.00028408092,0.00026979737,0.00064831384,0.02509745,0.0010182878,0.00015034356,0.0004979135,0.0009394238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016488777,0.000041126405,0.0243957,0.0000043450136,0.00009537386,0.000027205437,0.0025683588,0.000038781316,0.00001715398,0.96418005,0.007985672,0.0006297462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000680592,0.00003074355,0.0041831336,0.000094079085,0.000099019766,0.00008287025,0.02375626,0.00005449435,0.000119721706,0.027305655,0.94293725,0.0006561873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34793073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6854096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99149424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017947285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004917606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W771442057","doi":"10.29173/alr27","title":"&lt;i&gt;Manitoba Metis Federation Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General)&lt;/i&gt;: Breathing New Life into the \"Empty Box\" Doctrine of \"Indian Title\"","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Supreme court; Metis; Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Original meaning; Invocation; Ratification; Political science; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032226665869876554,"score_gpt":0.28906810921587256,"score_spread":0.256841443345996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W771442057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015756052,0.32509807,0.000010478528,0.09444465,0.0016910072,0.002064854,0.0000138316245,0.00007467783,0.5608464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8593147,0.08297094,0.001078856,0.017451832,0.0026193713,0.0001140759,0.00009252728,0.00005674485,0.03630097],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983561,0.00029868685,0.00035652643,0.00020429124,0.0005254592,0.0002589194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988963,0.0002175937,0.00019099384,0.00022459649,0.00020841419,0.0002620967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006059336,0.00016204017,0.00036960517,0.000009274889,0.00059944874,0.000076695535,0.00032475914,0.00006801962,0.00044342887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010922812,0.00010519351,0.000085628606,0.00022376934,0.0001486166,0.00018581624,0.000075173164,0.00011159072,0.00016560996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032645096,0.000022670505,0.00028081884,0.00032693584,0.00014676483,0.000005097305,0.009422117,0.0000054316265,0.000049093378,0.19054063,0.7812499,0.017947296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095303774,0.00001135024,0.00017376029,0.0002438257,0.00006268629,0.0000011942228,0.00015369606,0.0000038707362,0.000024604533,0.00010783635,0.9989803,0.0001415836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9802336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8435586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038950908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007113467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48552352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W774734181","doi":"","title":"A Gift Yet to Be Received: Presbyteral Confirmation and Anglican-Lutheran Relations in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of ecumenical studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eucharist; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Synod; Theology; Local church; Ecclesiology; Bishops; Autonomy; Christianity; Church Growth; Independence (probability theory); Religious studies; Law; History; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.050590547041492295,"score_gpt":0.34387501234028545,"score_spread":0.29328446529879315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W774734181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94122946,0.0012468862,0.00000985744,0.055349365,0.0002685164,0.00017013252,0.000002968048,0.0000062479958,0.0017165622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99767965,0.00048506333,0.00047618552,0.00090303645,0.00016427133,0.000007641712,2.2046706e-7,0.00000413578,0.00027982422],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984858,0.00030367388,0.00044642665,0.00011069473,0.00042120332,0.00023221929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986204,0.0006765495,0.00021509382,0.000051271232,0.00027890716,0.00015779716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008143947,0.00009946283,0.0003396883,0.000040174946,0.0003789929,0.00003910182,0.00013098889,0.000041098177,0.000029968121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030229571,0.000072441195,0.000045707147,0.00017308621,0.00016565288,0.0002114864,0.00006423809,0.00019402649,0.0000021542241],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004253604,0.00022835666,0.33297455,0.00009097981,0.001180623,0.000049502665,0.45343915,0.0011306092,0.00076952344,0.016395368,0.1600522,0.033263784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016693029,0.00034710203,0.5378132,0.00022187279,0.000089428344,0.000006005522,0.10619911,0.00009963031,0.000049424838,0.002878223,0.35023004,0.00039669836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45276225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94998366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4972214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006942272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018012922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55088186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W78414452","doi":"10.7202/043866ar","title":"PIERRE NOREAU et JOSÉ WOEHRLING (dir.), Appartenances, institutions et citoyenneté, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafeur, 2005, 319 p., ISBN 2-89127-693.788-790","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.028231682415351272,"score_gpt":0.2958553923702776,"score_spread":0.2676237099549263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W78414452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38417643,0.31781244,0.0074023507,0.17730331,0.004575137,0.0021060691,0.00058892614,0.0009719452,0.105063386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55771,0.11994674,0.019074196,0.008795712,0.003952736,0.00031995063,0.00028545325,0.00016176829,0.28975347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99405503,0.0007160875,0.0009313369,0.0010342993,0.0010646863,0.0021985865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973378,0.0005472216,0.0005040099,0.0005671486,0.00027520736,0.0007685738],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016216276,0.00080606336,0.0009434734,0.00014775511,0.0032139753,0.00046054253,0.0008783573,0.0011455925,0.000578757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082941965,0.0008030266,0.0005536131,0.0010339783,0.003391577,0.0015932026,0.00022010734,0.0020259381,0.0011074222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011303821,0.0010577344,0.0040150415,0.00032864767,0.0009548098,0.00013387241,0.1536067,0.01994633,0.00041450374,0.3607343,0.3413374,0.1173576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009377283,0.000051958257,0.003969048,0.00039604265,0.00026472518,0.000028872662,0.008768351,0.0008493018,0.000039458537,0.0025444932,0.9811181,0.0010319127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05363526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23907383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6397807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004353101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005193435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W788731214","doi":"","title":"Equality, Comparison, Discrimination, Status","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Supreme court; Law; Charter; Equal Protection Clause; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.03032668240152423,"score_gpt":0.3466262329047006,"score_spread":0.3162995505031764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W788731214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81405544,0.016628467,0.008009004,0.024435932,0.0011538846,0.00054109906,0.000009662033,0.00027596607,0.13489051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98599434,0.0021493013,0.00011813106,0.00005801977,0.0009296053,0.0000053406493,0.000006075069,0.0000103560415,0.010728809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957793,0.0003197338,0.00035835,0.00016117013,0.0006470085,0.0027344537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992662,0.00009164348,0.00021388486,0.00007483235,0.00024956945,0.00010387826],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021100892,0.0001312822,0.00019968524,0.0000430588,0.0018064658,0.00017866207,0.00026318958,0.00007788705,0.00007666775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022179185,0.00010567515,0.00011307627,0.0002253477,0.00025828613,0.00033546548,0.00004277569,0.0009770469,0.00006298448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009213472,0.00009418111,0.04302658,0.000002721124,0.000056156634,6.7936566e-7,0.007853847,0.000029098517,0.000043452055,0.93898034,0.0026691118,0.0072346367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007552867,0.00012234654,0.06119504,0.000016409052,0.000071999864,0.000010264827,0.12631635,0.000025101726,0.00004099853,0.5416684,0.26936314,0.0004146306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030979848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1941539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3973119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026649905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010932165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W79952626","doi":"10.21991/c9v094","title":"The Unlikely Union of Same-Sex Marriage, Polygamy and the Charter in Court","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Government (linguistics); Test (biology); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030054171413202796,"score_gpt":0.2729775993521866,"score_spread":0.24292342793898378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W79952626","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.111949034,0.012944702,0.009351348,0.1427054,0.0059557334,0.0052514235,0.00035528172,0.00031786872,0.71116924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972045,0.00088948273,0.00022790844,0.000523149,0.00010098439,0.00010010081,0.000007967607,0.0000049683754,0.0009409854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976309,0.00037341643,0.0005385501,0.0003031601,0.0005238199,0.0006301471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985112,0.0006515126,0.00022545595,0.00022946543,0.00025775566,0.0001245891],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016468507,0.00022711408,0.00033284753,0.000074558506,0.003250377,0.00008122978,0.00043779743,0.00015853063,0.00012735774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008771025,0.00013326261,0.00015377185,0.00033541606,0.02775686,0.00042955563,0.00020703685,0.00028568774,0.000038610815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010025633,0.000045095625,0.027872229,0.000006152912,0.00006219493,0.0000035486412,0.0047628656,0.000008311327,0.000017406393,0.9640701,0.0015068447,0.0015450228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008269304,0.000104772385,0.049408615,0.00033943343,0.0001714511,0.00006685446,0.14377391,0.0003712592,0.00028015045,0.15996534,0.6362668,0.0009820911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005569847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006849692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8852554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019077092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055977143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99804723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W809270734","doi":"","title":"Sacred Sites and Religious Freedom on Government Land","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Consecration; Political science; Tragedy (event); Natural resource; Law; Geography; Sociology; Archaeology; Social science; Ecology","score_opus":0.017350590218986904,"score_gpt":0.2657265281122704,"score_spread":0.24837593789328347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W809270734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8347663,0.002685731,0.0000041814037,0.002215131,0.0003317059,0.00036974633,0.000022341308,0.00012224296,0.1594826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99376434,0.000990362,0.00058737525,0.00073896814,0.0002464616,0.00002398564,0.0000018640009,0.000011930151,0.0036346996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831635,0.00019213693,0.00016755106,0.0003012089,0.00063938356,0.0003833479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992817,0.00020469441,0.0000716057,0.00015637258,0.000049441176,0.00023615637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038639345,0.00016133026,0.0002070457,0.000007839633,0.0009348591,0.00016228024,0.000141827,0.00010803678,0.00019767489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007141259,0.00012875567,0.00006183943,0.00011197502,0.00034164143,0.00015179529,0.000047336405,0.00018073469,0.00023181822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011609922,0.00032218653,0.30722895,0.00005358645,0.00026860344,0.00006250075,0.02415689,0.000070470436,0.0016990032,0.5503499,0.114183374,0.0014884613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008417371,0.000114987626,0.015477073,0.000039407576,0.00003136518,0.0000013493374,0.004436679,0.0000047071308,0.0004618319,0.0026895686,0.9755373,0.00036397728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010582286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019788103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86135393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002787283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002477316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W813338610","doi":"10.1163/ej.9789004179264.i-263.38","title":"3. Human Dignity And Same-Sex Marriage","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Law; Supreme court; Declaration; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04872514562066941,"score_gpt":0.3181387153934924,"score_spread":0.269413569772823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W813338610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018195012,0.00025498963,0.0000014650734,0.0013183381,0.00029276146,0.00037305846,0.000018747254,0.00015428709,0.9957669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021845672,0.00033358944,0.00026927897,0.0002633177,0.0008603317,0.000007971104,0.0000082696615,0.000022603554,0.976389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870765,0.000032995697,0.00020069924,0.00034634356,0.00042065667,0.00029163854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933404,0.00010007176,0.00012404652,0.00016036785,0.00010316368,0.00017828798],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003261578,0.0002626594,0.0003630777,0.000028447208,0.0016720315,0.00014821143,0.00022737104,0.00058658316,0.0053536734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010452804,0.00020116045,0.00011420574,0.000014324621,0.001157985,0.000109384986,0.0002000138,0.00059355213,0.00020270767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021088774,0.000014013764,0.0003810596,0.000029959774,0.000119910845,0.000011335021,0.015435213,1.105082e-8,0.00019282284,0.9650252,0.011915886,0.006872506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112347814,0.000017482687,0.0011055857,0.000022667595,0.000043074877,3.234904e-7,0.0011612024,7.084801e-8,0.000016276845,0.03697712,0.9601822,0.0003616711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010279874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041577812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94826627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010467343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003257686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W814970974","doi":"","title":"Judicial Method and Three Gaps in the Supreme Court of Canada's Assisted Suicide Judgment in Carter","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Judicial review; Majority opinion; Certiorari; Judicial independence; Judicial opinion; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.04161903674440396,"score_gpt":0.32700196479203747,"score_spread":0.2853829280476335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W814970974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96635723,0.0045810617,0.00019239934,0.02432713,0.00020411561,0.00031735213,0.0000028621,0.0000061556634,0.00401167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989584,0.00049474207,0.00009705691,0.00014750216,0.00016732687,0.0000070799506,5.443804e-7,0.0000050744916,0.00012229141],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970303,0.00056183484,0.00029717293,0.00012683756,0.00069562456,0.001288238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994112,0.0001828808,0.00013311727,0.000066892106,0.000121444114,0.00008441126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006064356,0.00010610844,0.00023667098,0.000044128454,0.00027096036,0.00003619323,0.00026424526,0.000062315106,0.0000072029634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037736254,0.00006993085,0.000039975028,0.00024365648,0.0001314591,0.00010550005,0.000033983215,0.0008798901,4.2520807e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035725223,0.00034270025,0.61613184,0.000022810307,0.00047438292,0.00008035555,0.15504918,0.00028876757,0.0005425276,0.1744939,0.0064333538,0.045782942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029089141,0.00035923327,0.5992495,0.000085661304,0.000085379455,0.00008166771,0.23705424,0.00009746457,0.00006488565,0.14889364,0.010687336,0.00043210594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82428026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99802077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17374046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002689774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00403782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71629184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W821636573","doi":"","title":"Common Prayer: A View from North of the 49th Parallel","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prayer; Archbishop; Worship; Context (archaeology); Liturgy; Baptism; History; Commonwealth; Religious studies; Sociology; Law; Genealogy; Theology; Philosophy; Classics; Political science","score_opus":0.04757506302660039,"score_gpt":0.3246997143746727,"score_spread":0.2771246513480723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W821636573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54407424,0.29096296,0.000014253665,0.07126387,0.00023835212,0.0041297115,0.000032379692,0.00017168293,0.08911258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8740908,0.11809886,0.00025903623,0.0063633244,0.000104982784,0.00018867174,0.0000047474223,0.000005667988,0.0008839101],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783593,0.00089385116,0.0003684459,0.00022288227,0.0003733606,0.00030552494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986528,0.0005229787,0.0002648831,0.00030750592,0.00014130054,0.000110502464],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041875485,0.0001505787,0.00055451767,0.0000047790313,0.00038749084,0.00002163332,0.000730057,0.00007639558,0.0031769678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012786451,0.00006834464,0.00026364773,0.0003250117,0.00097170286,0.00009667619,0.00024285247,0.0001943334,0.0002670624],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015397443,0.00047412066,0.27537176,0.0007805983,0.00032883024,0.0000067161563,0.009565153,0.0000021556532,0.000051381317,0.26304582,0.08290092,0.36745715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011501199,0.00004817903,0.40087685,0.000755621,0.00009439191,3.5840176e-7,0.0005129164,0.0000018951667,0.0000045239476,0.009726853,0.58766985,0.0001935349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011532807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004078003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50476897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048678063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029866322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99773425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W822681570","doi":"","title":"Recognition, Redistribution, and Representation: Assessing the Transformative Potential of Reparations for the Indian Residential Schools Experience","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Indigenous; Redress; Political science; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Law; Geography","score_opus":0.05088228083580455,"score_gpt":0.3802947962725244,"score_spread":0.32941251543671984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W822681570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9026749,0.0002453295,0.025324075,0.063467674,0.00039993497,0.0028800871,0.00005245376,0.00006727203,0.0048882347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982265,0.00011895428,0.0006880558,0.000084860585,0.00019500352,0.0003927883,0.00001591673,0.0000025418174,0.00027533658],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989855,0.00017513343,0.00026710765,0.00013198952,0.00027545748,0.00016481132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987323,0.00040621602,0.00013284768,0.000095983545,0.00058986805,0.000042781925],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043391983,0.000067179164,0.000091863374,0.0000132063215,0.0029293825,0.00034383865,0.00015007782,0.000049331724,0.00018453623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090006593,0.00003613899,0.000059788807,0.00021348927,0.0006648597,0.0011199353,0.00002410256,0.00008562874,0.0000063962784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042723546,0.00008586421,0.0046019168,0.000039411974,0.00028170462,8.403305e-7,0.87405086,0.000048051355,0.003992397,0.018423323,0.06394197,0.03449096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038204712,0.000027824326,0.07866404,0.000025470128,0.00006460177,0.0000022388524,0.90379465,0.00021981711,0.0035892758,0.01038904,0.0026967267,0.00014424135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0082436055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001155767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0955516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043401375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059407495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W828063601","doi":"","title":"Feeling Relational: The Use of Buddhist Meditation in Restorative Practices","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meditation; Restorative justice; Buddhism; Humanities; Emptiness; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Ethnology; Psychology; Law; Criminology; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.13634336597522256,"score_gpt":0.35804567402626086,"score_spread":0.2217023080510383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W828063601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9404575,0.00047874806,0.00011549637,0.04335113,0.0007586376,0.00047124352,0.000004461603,0.000027633794,0.014335105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995899,0.0002851304,0.0027340478,0.00023371412,0.00044420743,0.000013365556,0.000001935343,0.0000060618013,0.00038252253],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828744,0.00055179955,0.00032169974,0.0000891525,0.0005640519,0.0001858644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973488,0.0012980363,0.0007352189,0.00006266263,0.0004971352,0.000058136007],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009955621,0.0000720341,0.00012162594,0.000028866589,0.0013221119,0.00020136808,0.00015849079,0.00006409224,0.00016148709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035010315,0.000044604894,0.000047986363,0.00021689932,0.00044233858,0.0017634914,0.000031772754,0.00034498342,0.000026955067],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006930625,0.00021729908,0.055739034,0.000020305744,0.00019566769,0.000020864387,0.56081307,0.005606886,0.00090438727,0.3454827,0.025324132,0.0056063756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064542,0.00007113909,0.25121218,0.00014063712,0.000051869396,0.0000108281665,0.10524049,0.0007603516,0.000055790788,0.008851962,0.63268113,0.0002781977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053249422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062493157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.607357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016170827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006675983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W83215051","doi":"","title":"Practising the Virtues of Amiability and Civility in Pride and Prejudice. (Conference Papers)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Persuasions; The Jane Austen Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humility; Pride; Perfection; Virtue; Courtesy; Civility; Passions; Philosophy; Kindness; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Law; Theology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04281530106415868,"score_gpt":0.3233823416646982,"score_spread":0.2805670406005395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W83215051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9669136,0.0011178359,0.0000024168683,0.023308307,0.00007152907,0.0002983147,0.0000028172365,0.000010582144,0.00827459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99455285,0.0045154467,0.00015307606,0.00010951338,0.00011198034,0.0000061209225,1.6892665e-7,0.0000042136107,0.000546604],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977856,0.0010172143,0.00032119302,0.00018577088,0.00040427523,0.00028592758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844515,0.0009862764,0.00017894663,0.00015379122,0.00012757297,0.000108242995],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031145744,0.00012158896,0.0002198037,0.000020385283,0.001797642,0.000157342,0.0002646968,0.00007259811,0.00045355607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014521031,0.00006155674,0.0000587589,0.00018080791,0.0013572939,0.0003492167,0.000098575096,0.0005269795,0.000002724182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034659705,0.00025750554,0.31973055,0.00005335116,0.00017793423,0.000016029613,0.43136942,0.00007971848,0.0024034563,0.0019666979,0.0004325174,0.24316624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043406276,0.00007243116,0.8603022,0.00011169927,0.00006346004,0.000044439003,0.12318985,0.000080304904,0.000036633734,0.0021427542,0.0133703295,0.00015182915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037496828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047573443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5405717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011090653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008657605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W85585993","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Peoples and the Law: Comparative and Critical Perspectives","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Indigenous rights; Aotearoa; Law; Sovereignty; Human rights; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0184145415422912,"score_gpt":0.2510950958742552,"score_spread":0.23268055433196402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W85585993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07022067,0.00841777,0.0000065382096,0.0009820258,0.00009591942,0.0005124649,0.00008449176,0.00006502398,0.9196151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67516524,0.0009695959,0.000086697415,0.00002898758,0.0001909055,4.5880964e-7,0.000009986491,0.000008502596,0.3235396],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868643,0.00013872603,0.00013410703,0.00036094268,0.0004367217,0.0002430434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832106,0.00095734955,0.00018555083,0.000134572,0.0002671741,0.00013431186],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012746813,0.00021803885,0.00052058237,0.00003611998,0.0023266652,0.00029696824,0.00029733876,0.00020639929,0.000009171538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012529227,0.00019281812,0.00015724852,0.000057941805,0.006606616,0.00062501675,0.00021342264,0.00027878085,0.0000068350532],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001771033,0.00007674008,0.00029671122,0.00007450449,0.00031946634,0.00008164243,0.6948645,6.306146e-7,0.000003915537,0.29371583,0.009742288,0.00064663857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012703276,0.00026233157,0.01235842,0.00028628745,0.0004140937,0.000031649204,0.76823485,0.000006433064,0.0000047765275,0.008894213,0.20750134,0.000735265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020399643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035722295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6049446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002664265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017182433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W85857415","doi":"10.21991/c9d962","title":"Redressing the Harms of Government (In)Action: A Section 7 Versus Section 15 Charter Showdown","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Redress; Harm; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Supreme court; Action (physics); Framing (construction); Law and economics; Sociology; Business; History","score_opus":0.048625248510399545,"score_gpt":0.30340101101388656,"score_spread":0.254775762503487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W85857415","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5437862,0.002082614,0.023146534,0.08362292,0.036179498,0.0058101113,0.0003288501,0.00056499575,0.30447823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972977,0.00015070422,0.00022864589,0.0002919218,0.00075611594,0.0002637261,0.00001852733,0.0000070012948,0.0009856339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713975,0.00019093396,0.000577729,0.00040859677,0.0010224481,0.0006605233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986828,0.0003042619,0.000296647,0.00022413599,0.00035213638,0.0001400186],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005397588,0.00026670494,0.00030155593,0.0000794164,0.0028915196,0.00017492624,0.0002861307,0.00023820791,0.0007773191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005819593,0.00020416918,0.0002175002,0.0005025063,0.005730405,0.0013445324,0.0001241026,0.00039851322,0.000113784365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018045703,0.00019337074,0.028685888,0.000028641884,0.00016615883,0.0000046133646,0.002404714,0.0011494453,0.0019118398,0.94512767,0.015407543,0.0047396463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006945911,0.00027762944,0.06737727,0.00061358814,0.00022421862,0.00007816807,0.13502494,0.0020560105,0.0018753852,0.0075594,0.776516,0.0014514648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006270972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007369598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9375683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013598206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045214302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W932158291","doi":"","title":"Puisne justice : Australia, common law, puisne, list of puisne justices of the supreme court of Canada, associate justice, lord ordinary, Sri Lanka, Hong Kong, judge","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"Betascript Pub. eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sri lanka; Law; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; History; Ancient history; South asia","score_opus":0.05031207357757568,"score_gpt":0.29435070544973446,"score_spread":0.2440386318721588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W932158291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35563105,0.003203027,0.000004529385,0.006015202,0.018437112,0.0036397022,0.0060342164,0.00013137097,0.6069038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7179941,0.00021878372,0.0003415464,0.00042597525,0.0015797605,0.00008799923,0.0001276062,0.00011517111,0.2791091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869508,0.0016703785,0.003376576,0.0013934992,0.0041355332,0.002473204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872949,0.0020275586,0.005589801,0.0016463768,0.0026557269,0.00078563945],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029614235,0.0017148366,0.0038413804,0.00017635262,0.002696154,0.00019672846,0.003989488,0.0019677577,0.00080918445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015762902,0.0013988725,0.0013135499,0.00058284844,0.009204929,0.0004810411,0.0014346868,0.002957688,0.00002607956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058197253,0.0018377751,0.022907495,0.024624644,0.008508221,0.00026170074,0.07542007,0.00026843054,0.009591293,0.45797223,0.39266643,0.0053597493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002337019,0.0005268492,0.03579048,0.0027362609,0.021774122,0.00001557606,0.026232138,0.000083606465,0.005187756,0.0016762202,0.90089554,0.0027444481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86091065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9556818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5082291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020074856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031276932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W94353500","doi":"10.29173/agora12404","title":"What’s Mine is Hers: A Solution to Common Law Property Woes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Division (mathematics); Property law; Law; Common law; Inequality; Common property; Law and economics; Real property; Political science; Sociology; Property rights; Philosophy; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10625960575862008,"score_gpt":0.35225136832048276,"score_spread":0.24599176256186267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W94353500","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34496394,0.00021953625,0.0001632023,0.57753193,0.0020562934,0.0006520965,0.000004047907,0.00012275961,0.07428617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98774785,0.0001420268,0.0007738452,0.007766944,0.00056289195,0.0000122363335,2.1089929e-7,0.0000101897695,0.0029838078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953745,0.00040050337,0.00039633783,0.00034268026,0.001550003,0.0019359774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771184,0.00015416244,0.00013259512,0.00025957185,0.00048828626,0.001253564],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028353059,0.0002130093,0.00026173776,0.00007275842,0.0057135453,0.0012309239,0.0013387308,0.00007920046,0.00018213532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005623159,0.00010126398,0.0001438991,0.0008458042,0.0053033126,0.0022352862,0.00032942556,0.00046508358,0.00027908225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042099786,0.00017759149,0.00090005656,0.0000055596697,0.00003878152,0.000017490009,0.07571483,0.0000019523509,0.0008731653,0.911601,0.0070083635,0.003619106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081199926,0.00070133014,0.026347926,0.00033747006,0.00016006219,0.00014125732,0.20349012,0.00026010248,0.004172039,0.67715687,0.0852852,0.0011356471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04159741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008673624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64278394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010650114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003622198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W9510936","doi":"","title":"A Common Law of the Family? Reflections on Rick v. Brandsema","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Precedent; Common law; Damages; Political science; Statutory law; Statute; Unconscionability; Doctrine; Adversarial system","score_opus":0.030643312137787357,"score_gpt":0.3436963505419684,"score_spread":0.313053038404181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W9510936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7402493,0.002500081,0.00009894677,0.030792378,0.00057058875,0.0003516445,0.0000025031675,0.000063239524,0.22537132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951871,0.0016186774,0.000015969834,0.00072332885,0.0003127461,0.000002061448,2.0183803e-7,0.000004792656,0.0021351182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978366,0.0002736598,0.00020882484,0.00010658388,0.00045021012,0.0011241541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999494,0.000079465,0.00016181343,0.00011061338,0.00010006861,0.000054002718],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010349152,0.00009998798,0.0001663368,0.000023989152,0.0019602089,0.000044361936,0.00034631585,0.00007267405,0.00001196713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008809554,0.000060659873,0.00018347931,0.00031786115,0.00023957249,0.000124189,0.000018619883,0.0011400658,0.000011576003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024934914,0.00007835221,0.00035019612,7.6923493e-7,0.00005676894,3.357568e-7,0.005238174,0.000018091789,0.0006768291,0.98858273,0.0004495521,0.0045232396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009395149,0.000766035,0.027117513,0.00006759385,0.00008212096,0.000024371879,0.042477753,0.0000040642403,0.0003537993,0.8587851,0.06910388,0.00027825576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003966745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042655125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2549378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009848172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044844355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W967315131","doi":"10.29173/alr1370","title":"Expressive Harms and the Strands of Charter Equality: Drawing out Parallel Coherent Approaches to Discrimination","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Normative; Law; Sociology; Expression (computer science); Harm; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2167821349028373,"score_gpt":0.3395492063579511,"score_spread":0.12276707145511381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W967315131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04584684,0.24825358,0.00024852916,0.33636388,0.0004756332,0.008380632,0.00001948328,0.00006924212,0.36034217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97763366,0.018315798,0.00009645407,0.0012893432,0.00007588265,0.00019733346,0.0000030602685,0.000006118473,0.0023823597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864244,0.00038900768,0.00029168368,0.00019037855,0.00029005494,0.00019642751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919045,0.00040762968,0.00013971841,0.00014053751,0.000048839578,0.00007282856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000573537,0.0001210077,0.00038029708,0.000005671103,0.00042484963,0.000053114254,0.00018223411,0.000037019337,0.00017699451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031113857,0.000065135566,0.00010602305,0.00007941856,0.0005137184,0.00017685651,0.000066625,0.000074260926,0.000028899189],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014232517,0.00008118433,0.00032436752,0.0012824467,0.00013573513,4.818235e-7,0.27209428,0.0000015591281,0.0000133044705,0.6885843,0.0030174563,0.034450594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023368988,0.00009859719,0.002169611,0.006210996,0.0008131648,0.0000016336344,0.02214104,0.00012891961,0.00009479413,0.0018932901,0.96327865,0.0008323863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010001074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010847309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9602612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030011888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000041252633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W970194839","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2636523","title":"British Columbia's New Family Law on Guardianship, Relocation, and Family Violence: The First Year of Judicial Interpretation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Relocation; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Family law; Criminology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.008418540867135128,"score_gpt":0.25030207958227924,"score_spread":0.24188353871514412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W970194839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9769325,0.0029424683,0.00080907904,0.0048682136,0.00040712228,0.00031207464,0.0000023640184,0.000035286972,0.013690853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99142075,0.006845978,0.000036645164,0.0005027037,0.00057132257,0.0000048989145,9.811304e-7,0.000009012529,0.0006077194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821687,0.00021498873,0.00024400747,0.00015484197,0.0004219784,0.0007473138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993275,0.00017179732,0.00017969051,0.00007997671,0.00017148344,0.00006954266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017011042,0.0000791478,0.000168004,0.000014236528,0.001138259,0.0002583731,0.00025166213,0.000083183055,0.00002030114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003832878,0.000078757905,0.00007566213,0.00015433416,0.00040135987,0.00017576975,0.00002822231,0.00066384533,0.000009907392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011775101,0.00009872553,0.029949762,0.000019937375,0.00033999185,0.0000013522898,0.029519422,0.000059778446,0.000111743975,0.548138,0.015595672,0.37604785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014161482,0.00076226523,0.30350107,0.0004988151,0.00013143754,0.00001774947,0.07598118,0.000073794756,0.000011572094,0.561006,0.05616328,0.00043671022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1840051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57741964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39341456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044886398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004994569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8754683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W97498150","doi":"","title":"Law and Morality in Public Discourse: How Christians Can Rebuild Our Culture","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Forgiveness; Faith; Prayer; Morality; Sociology; Law; Public morality; Religious studies; Theology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.039647393788616835,"score_gpt":0.33254266138270494,"score_spread":0.2928952675940881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W97498150","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2846273,0.00031840592,0.00003651329,0.53098774,0.00028841317,0.0004498424,0.000017297587,0.00019285548,0.18308164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917138,0.00010331364,0.0003221909,0.0009790001,0.00026367066,0.000016177619,0.0000039540473,0.0000056504123,0.0065922495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866617,0.00025006765,0.00011350694,0.00026288367,0.00030549007,0.00040186106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954474,0.000034998116,0.00005260345,0.00011501661,0.00008158459,0.00017106313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005428887,0.00013012397,0.00020702028,0.000015825946,0.00070766977,0.00027982847,0.00018760766,0.00011896914,0.000022556524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004042737,0.00008765582,0.000041495405,0.00019164571,0.00040221424,0.00031383077,0.00008256497,0.00017678537,0.00000631671],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036322997,0.00006538704,0.04897701,0.000020049283,0.000026280832,0.000003055365,0.05026372,0.000001066983,0.00007790033,0.87003493,0.027800113,0.0027268338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060846837,0.00004409292,0.103565685,0.000025383262,0.000018294,7.623913e-7,0.1744172,0.000040545237,0.000040985477,0.0026376224,0.7181307,0.00047026086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11793083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46134314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8673973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013557653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025187308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88794297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W98171210","doi":"10.25071/fbcf0148","title":"Treaty rights, the Indian Act, and the Canadian Constitution: The Supreme Court’s 1999 decisions","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada Watch","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitution","score_opus":0.02065652773363634,"score_gpt":0.25424252956615045,"score_spread":0.2335860018325141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W98171210","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15011135,0.0012745649,3.0427304e-7,0.7167367,0.0004704131,0.00076612853,0.000075630254,0.000023179655,0.13054177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894758,0.00036998215,0.000007361444,0.0026151822,0.00026773763,0.00003792617,0.0000046467803,0.0000034461216,0.00721796],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840283,0.00030619785,0.00015282902,0.00017591781,0.00049902295,0.00046322055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985401,0.0008162919,0.000038199552,0.00023976613,0.00008941422,0.0002762162],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059621036,0.00013250216,0.00015173618,0.0000072904986,0.010103277,0.00022685378,0.00049608434,0.000073288065,0.0007465821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002649436,0.000051478015,0.000050562063,0.00023093334,0.0027482244,0.00008803828,0.00002865815,0.00025320184,0.000021093703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015340647,0.000005495705,0.005182857,0.0000011304382,0.00009209611,0.000033397468,0.051700037,0.000018817595,2.6678325e-7,0.034379493,0.9015947,0.0069763847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025227602,0.0000028628865,0.015123058,0.000007726034,0.000030723273,0.000005415173,0.0071378127,0.0000066249545,0.0000021361116,0.0009406248,0.97639287,0.00009787504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99977267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8393644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008209557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018700055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W981815983","doi":"","title":"L'obligation d'accommodement raisonnable en matière religieuse: une notion canadienne","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutions: Revue de droit constitutionnel appliqué","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.035553406667716815,"score_gpt":0.26156678356463114,"score_spread":0.22601337689691434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W981815983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0783679,0.014437651,0.1345617,0.047011297,0.009984592,0.0052486206,0.0007064501,0.0011951127,0.7084867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9706206,0.0032330018,0.010783009,0.00056512223,0.0012816817,0.00077405333,0.00014426484,0.000037110494,0.01256119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99503094,0.00047371694,0.0012564316,0.0010247832,0.0004974583,0.0017166915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99690163,0.0003122843,0.000577664,0.0006683824,0.0007961601,0.00074387837],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016986533,0.00068998383,0.00081075047,0.00024264731,0.003666514,0.00020250354,0.0008154866,0.00082540786,0.0014583654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010594887,0.00081987295,0.00038624246,0.0018599255,0.006994866,0.0013868269,0.00023924424,0.0008655808,0.0016708495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003971408,0.00039759022,0.0017320131,0.0002554959,0.00026228157,0.00007959945,0.023959903,0.00079245656,0.0001210827,0.9609558,0.0059066643,0.005497398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022512588,0.00017038488,0.009674905,0.002013749,0.001142801,0.00024230788,0.023999792,0.0017501655,0.00056645746,0.14741473,0.8086064,0.0021670824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19088191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08378712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8922527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066415076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019364695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}