{"meta":{"query_hash":"af0063289f12","filters":{"topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies"},"cohort_total":2179,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2179,"exported":2179,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/af0063289f12","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Multicultural+Socio-Legal+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1021136529","doi":"10.2986/tren.006-1604","title":"Recapturing The Evangelism Mandate In Emmanuel Baptist Church, Exeter, Ontario","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Evangelism; Religious studies; Mandate; Theology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.04030248226078317,"score_gpt":0.31351091947928655,"score_spread":0.2732084372185034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1021136529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5880108,0.0015447339,0.0007240464,0.2174906,0.0010607823,0.0002472055,0.00023057628,0.0000496266,0.19064157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78070194,0.0007257553,0.0005763497,0.02199918,0.0000880331,0.00011498172,0.000054491167,0.00007991996,0.19565937],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99551815,0.00083635736,0.00007933616,0.00035401038,0.00066523586,0.0025468797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99209505,0.0014794427,0.00034855262,0.00022112881,0.0015898303,0.0042660027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003992041,0.00015092893,0.0003445719,0.0003879838,0.055505462,0.0048346287,0.0019638957,0.0048473715,0.009602116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009318355,0.0006466164,0.00022241169,0.000505914,0.009766977,0.0017898992,0.0050491043,0.0088919895,0.00062644517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002142999,0.00017534605,0.027635155,0.0001751348,0.000025703346,0.0030988355,0.5465662,0.00037018768,0.0024163176,0.15526567,0.23010586,0.033951264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029159886,0.00004451061,0.051969443,0.00021346826,0.000015694512,0.00020242055,0.38959488,0.00013102699,0.00084929867,0.002763454,0.55412644,0.000060138547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9638622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99557686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07571365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07571365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17812896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5493436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W102505703","doi":"","title":"Returning to Find Much Wealth: Identifying the Need for a Revised Judicial Approach to Aboriginal Kinship in British Columbia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kinship; Legislature; Statutory law; Political science; Law; Sociology; Fictive kinship; Kinship care; Genealogy; History","score_opus":0.04992723044586038,"score_gpt":0.3764465545138259,"score_spread":0.3265193240679655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W102505703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33069408,0.12501071,0.002957231,0.21949351,0.0013210804,0.00031032116,0.00016619414,0.00005654959,0.31999043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91427946,0.029840242,0.0024082619,0.021428077,0.00016470607,0.000092967224,0.000060241895,0.00003207158,0.03169401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947608,0.0018003953,0.00026503784,0.00040893455,0.0016084169,0.0011564019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871995,0.005756847,0.0004435025,0.00031682427,0.005248141,0.0010351962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008212035,0.00019141652,0.0003831725,0.0034240216,0.02409265,0.011606641,0.0027148023,0.0034817415,0.0027270308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019324869,0.00034214745,0.00015655707,0.0037535392,0.015415966,0.002598434,0.003559531,0.005542811,0.00018948366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040103932,0.000071642324,0.017758325,0.00097083877,0.000028522089,0.0028358311,0.2143176,0.00081819703,0.0012327619,0.50653553,0.0572078,0.19818299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028837154,0.000044835033,0.06992119,0.0030314995,0.00009645314,0.0006900262,0.27652612,0.0010814769,0.0007236421,0.038932897,0.60872406,0.00019893158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98249394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09370885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09370885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1877376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6799085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W103406808","doi":"10.1017/ccol9780521888622","title":"The Cambridge Companion to Thomas More","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Rhetoric; Heresy; Humanism; Literature; Performance art; Art; Classics; Power (physics); History; Opposition (politics); Art history; Philosophy; Theology; Law","score_opus":0.042569601529901545,"score_gpt":0.2581052821609236,"score_spread":0.21553568063102205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W103406808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000380681,0.040632606,0.0006115983,0.014786777,0.0065876227,0.000018311004,0.0003898322,0.0002578246,0.9363347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024316031,0.009442243,0.000281548,0.00218802,0.00090997777,0.000015410302,0.00017115947,0.00015120061,0.9844088],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993511,0.000105447245,0.000024285708,0.00012971248,0.00032148568,0.00006794202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945885,0.00014902432,0.000028218032,0.00007736443,0.00017966663,0.00010690687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004373342,0.00061671843,0.00052139815,0.0019411405,0.0024580678,0.0052967547,0.00068130356,0.0018220233,0.22874574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018874174,0.00039698635,0.00025215332,0.0024936788,0.0013481131,0.00433706,0.0022140194,0.0024553183,0.10362642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005298756,0.0000073733668,0.000026274345,0.0000698114,8.28521e-7,0.000038745184,0.00038171367,0.000023055916,0.000071279675,0.027074592,0.93635094,0.035950173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.6233155e-7,0.000001064774,0.000035364697,0.000053556898,2.0073553e-7,0.000030303863,0.00006460201,0.0000042477423,0.000011244716,0.00087441166,0.9989235,0.0000011394677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006958963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019179424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22874574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003382574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016801009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7652308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1037789193","doi":"","title":"Fr. Lawrence Dewan, O.P","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œreview of metaphysics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Nephew and niece; Religious studies; History; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.07489256362230107,"score_gpt":0.35215576938819443,"score_spread":0.27726320576589336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1037789193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009664618,0.046850502,0.00076081674,0.10462335,0.08169041,0.00008897355,0.0009324656,0.00061681017,0.7634702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024882574,0.0071272603,0.00012555522,0.005021636,0.0019947502,0.000015592901,0.00010047329,0.000094244526,0.9830322],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929094,0.000049671566,0.00001970725,0.00018113377,0.0003163536,0.00014217015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987525,0.00007559194,0.000047316767,0.000049224276,0.00057057117,0.00050484575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007241412,0.0009216383,0.00057032955,0.0010265562,0.003873188,0.004020444,0.0008419589,0.0025566248,0.24563983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026111458,0.00038316209,0.00027552174,0.0007725187,0.0009868573,0.002639311,0.0020992644,0.0036161216,0.14161775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008045633,0.0000048672578,0.000050004208,0.000030807376,5.5785637e-7,0.0000530006,0.000044067452,0.00001511974,0.000048014015,0.002360435,0.9766077,0.020777335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.321013e-7,0.0000025503712,0.00008253157,0.000028199456,3.0319308e-7,0.000042985255,0.000043267395,0.000006162756,0.00001967697,0.00012851876,0.9996433,0.0000015623267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07300195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.099899895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24563983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004952035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006786977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82174706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W104007895","doi":"10.29173/alr107","title":"The Crown's Duty to Consult Aboriginal Peoples: Towards an Understanding of the Source, Purpose, and Limits of the Duty","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"BC Hydro (Canada)","funders":"Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers","keywords":"Duty; Obligation; Crown (dentistry); Law; Political science; Treaty; Fiduciary; Law and economics; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.057877087254941825,"score_gpt":0.35154756707407236,"score_spread":0.2936704798191305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W104007895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056812476,0.16351882,0.004044644,0.24566112,0.0012546157,0.00007948056,0.00009941618,0.000043796404,0.52848566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8169914,0.06587569,0.0036843228,0.045342427,0.0006179033,0.000066047854,0.000075707845,0.00003547266,0.06731102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893863,0.0026186402,0.0003074802,0.0005643185,0.0042929496,0.00283031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98818445,0.0057947002,0.0006433436,0.00037702176,0.0037794893,0.0012209378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009873882,0.00028419288,0.00061083125,0.0026255173,0.013646922,0.0152280275,0.0027940723,0.007842127,0.001781484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011360905,0.0004296184,0.0003541003,0.0027633864,0.029555725,0.005112873,0.0031084232,0.0075639747,0.00025581123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054608777,0.000010729346,0.0007016227,0.00014818159,0.0000055203295,0.00024667307,0.0236462,0.00015664205,0.00013340585,0.9429746,0.021036668,0.010934383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014131325,0.000025076919,0.012601997,0.0022190844,0.00004605956,0.00039290215,0.054370735,0.00060711853,0.00026304976,0.15624575,0.773129,0.00008509902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9278712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94829625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07212877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058556646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16344531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42486018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W109252628","doi":"10.29173/alr305","title":"Parenting Beyond the Nuclear Family: Doe v. Alberta","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Enforcement; Charter; Family law; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.032320399046580524,"score_gpt":0.32318214436563886,"score_spread":0.29086174531905834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W109252628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03779036,0.13573045,0.00060597126,0.20002027,0.00532383,0.00015755014,0.0024381375,0.00013489505,0.6177985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38782254,0.089867756,0.0010034954,0.17903858,0.0013724628,0.00019024208,0.0014855027,0.000074171505,0.33914527],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99566025,0.00052404165,0.000121707744,0.0002881546,0.0017825275,0.0016233536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953852,0.0019633877,0.0002463893,0.00015448556,0.001411623,0.00083903037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003712048,0.00042579387,0.0005181205,0.0010504079,0.0077157365,0.0027817753,0.0028806508,0.009449148,0.010155623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00644003,0.0005402178,0.00047763955,0.0018377134,0.0026010629,0.0009490675,0.0012430666,0.0055872193,0.0007724101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014081698,0.00004821441,0.007621399,0.00054935,0.00006879673,0.001764754,0.002912683,0.0005846623,0.00060944277,0.12548792,0.7997636,0.060448304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104018975,0.00008414705,0.046617072,0.0018741363,0.00027571028,0.0004534579,0.0044967732,0.00019042204,0.0005450278,0.007915347,0.93734175,0.00010210244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9388118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97891563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06118822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021860937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09476847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1586129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W109278735","doi":"10.21991/c9z079","title":"COULD THE MEECH LAKE ACCORD AFFECT THE PROTECTION OF EQUALITY RIGHTS FOR WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CANADA?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Political science; Gender equality; Environmental protection; Public administration; Socioeconomics; Environmental planning; Geography; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.056049261806597354,"score_gpt":0.28504674326278334,"score_spread":0.22899748145618598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W109278735","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17691061,0.0036212504,0.002000474,0.4401201,0.0022773864,0.00034594967,0.0009225659,0.000092472925,0.37370917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6946717,0.0017485849,0.0023977577,0.15771873,0.00047666577,0.00028172915,0.00015821263,0.00006314828,0.14248347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9791901,0.0022037365,0.0004284368,0.001170712,0.005483523,0.011523552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882783,0.0033698983,0.0006356882,0.00047688233,0.003707963,0.0035311715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010813123,0.0006291667,0.0010562934,0.0020351657,0.036563084,0.015552362,0.0041784365,0.02169121,0.012105876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028825488,0.0011764236,0.0015919768,0.0022605667,0.013532417,0.004947641,0.006391672,0.016317703,0.0006399223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017569368,0.00014563254,0.008306428,0.00010952623,0.00009200499,0.0006875938,0.0101492815,0.001330046,0.0012284332,0.9029133,0.059449196,0.015412914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000882616,0.00021900075,0.08886681,0.0009397603,0.00043930588,0.00027978225,0.029315297,0.004449767,0.0035746817,0.16463158,0.7052628,0.0011385641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9921278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113363355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.113363355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29955733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82251257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W109892788","doi":"10.14264/10615","title":"Transforming Constitutionalism: Indigenous-White Relations in Canada, 1983-1987","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"The University of Queensland","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Indigenous; Politics; Negotiation; Diversity (politics); Order (exchange); Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Sociology; Democracy; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.013156056974152362,"score_gpt":0.23443343750487244,"score_spread":0.22127738053072007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W109892788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63027436,0.005566396,0.0010587081,0.038981117,0.0004958292,0.00019198013,0.00033804827,0.00006513494,0.32302848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92365867,0.0017485125,0.00041091675,0.0032837745,0.000040284056,0.000034953762,0.00011427042,0.000025967604,0.07068258],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99414045,0.0005489012,0.000073349875,0.0003452034,0.002030462,0.0028616758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966697,0.0007065478,0.00029522486,0.00008464999,0.0010832647,0.0011606787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036493787,0.0003237413,0.00036867821,0.0014564493,0.05154243,0.0075745923,0.0014640292,0.0019366125,0.004760393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067341756,0.00036587784,0.00031374535,0.0040906076,0.015872056,0.0017016076,0.0047111036,0.0049766256,0.00021486213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013385357,0.00010614946,0.022184767,0.00021408228,0.00002770305,0.0023700965,0.52932525,0.00087373354,0.0015922535,0.3477681,0.03660653,0.05879748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029464529,0.0000441172,0.08239472,0.00018429528,0.000028870834,0.00022335349,0.33299917,0.000530245,0.0010638171,0.007422728,0.5749784,0.00010081948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99716264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27725095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27725095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26151353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83828646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W110264515","doi":"","title":"Access to Charter Justice and the Rule of Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Constitutional law; Rule of law; Common law; Politics","score_opus":0.021474389761905473,"score_gpt":0.3327613843592749,"score_spread":0.3112869945973694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W110264515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16961108,0.004520126,0.0037913,0.069021866,0.0002546438,0.000071201066,0.00023501295,0.00006691382,0.7524279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711909,0.0009925824,0.00053659343,0.0026811357,0.00007682912,0.000017768878,0.00003434805,0.000015949277,0.02445388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99074733,0.0011942995,0.00016781213,0.0006014368,0.003098581,0.004190455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928727,0.0022545108,0.00078463735,0.00034441863,0.0017668152,0.0019769098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037781834,0.00019102944,0.0004902511,0.0014764856,0.016795889,0.0115530025,0.001420472,0.0029346852,0.010814342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016352626,0.00022564836,0.00022129419,0.0021214625,0.025821442,0.00420205,0.0053016082,0.004431232,0.00057720585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019192363,0.00003355962,0.0045984294,0.000030703315,0.0000058411833,0.00038126754,0.021996748,0.0002987738,0.00010764693,0.9405122,0.010687331,0.021328285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049774913,0.000063926826,0.04517262,0.0007335824,0.000025510872,0.00042866348,0.05867999,0.0011038758,0.0003079948,0.43811396,0.4551971,0.00012299101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91326463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9475359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91326463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031983178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06991349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2320553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W114583704","doi":"","title":"A Right to Voluntary Euthanasia? Confusion in Canada in Carter","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Notre Dame journal of law, ethics & public policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Life imprisonment; Assisted suicide; Economic Justice; Constitutional right; Prison; Medicine","score_opus":0.06317269375793548,"score_gpt":0.36378146148433516,"score_spread":0.30060876772639966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W114583704","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08533533,0.016387112,0.0009672143,0.71439433,0.0035136798,0.00010808108,0.00027894063,0.00006412258,0.17895123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56956846,0.0085370345,0.0011081959,0.36103904,0.0007278185,0.00008123171,0.00009178696,0.00008893762,0.058757532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98934597,0.0013501871,0.00025096888,0.00097574317,0.003258685,0.0048184614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99162114,0.002670582,0.00027865704,0.00013360132,0.0026049814,0.0026911232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065621478,0.00039792902,0.0007052994,0.001162199,0.04964015,0.009778727,0.0032042814,0.014085741,0.0040432895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0142959375,0.0007682164,0.000643375,0.0024196852,0.01676593,0.0029393772,0.0039936514,0.018721737,0.00024574174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008876364,0.00006053241,0.0046802084,0.000192138,0.00003136959,0.00192808,0.03186831,0.000492654,0.00060361286,0.67817736,0.24979626,0.032080643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008612548,0.00006368769,0.011067024,0.0006951257,0.00008279409,0.0007788774,0.0552266,0.00073949323,0.0008648208,0.043743934,0.88621867,0.00043285926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99363625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1419905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1419905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2926501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1149290347","doi":"","title":"The Most Comprehensive Judicial Record Ever Produced: The Polygamy Reference","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Emory law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Supreme court; Conviction; Economic Justice; Political science; Statutory law; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.10628026660196352,"score_gpt":0.345984453224142,"score_spread":0.2397041866221785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1149290347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022509962,0.11017876,0.0029115293,0.22032389,0.047703657,0.00013606998,0.0054389574,0.0003030839,0.5904941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35538745,0.09963097,0.003208472,0.09970865,0.03239547,0.00020387968,0.0046471194,0.0005034539,0.40431446],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956037,0.00082330883,0.000345788,0.00046831626,0.0021690005,0.000589965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853219,0.0057077548,0.000774966,0.0013921035,0.006301472,0.0005017839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029003269,0.00028033496,0.00047976803,0.0050825467,0.00771324,0.0073397933,0.0014056131,0.0028549633,0.011418914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01971607,0.00038326075,0.00023886056,0.0063877515,0.0033554,0.0025965306,0.0022366075,0.004658695,0.0025534397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012545229,0.000018011286,0.0008277409,0.00022485474,0.000008609153,0.00033661758,0.0016013659,0.000038288694,0.00022467897,0.097700775,0.8436382,0.05536834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021664002,0.000005033108,0.0018030005,0.00043157153,0.000009911945,0.00009124388,0.00045597408,0.000047438112,0.00020109914,0.0019207702,0.9950197,0.000012176725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11315348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17835449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11315348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067743887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0143603375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22498971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1160745365","doi":"","title":"Lord Mansfield: Justice in the Age of Reason","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business law international","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Economic Justice; Biography; Queen (butterfly); Scots; Throne; History; Religious studies; Classics; Art; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Literature","score_opus":0.08182934633893763,"score_gpt":0.3589090174403682,"score_spread":0.27707967110143056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1160745365","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025029795,0.26963088,0.00038230626,0.44831362,0.018163998,0.000022925102,0.00005712147,0.000048169775,0.26087803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15651211,0.101958156,0.0006513529,0.14751984,0.017004065,0.00007503503,0.00006587409,0.00011537483,0.57609826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811494,0.00068599853,0.000054710225,0.00013310627,0.00064347667,0.00036779273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904615,0.00041904836,0.00008339488,0.00003196165,0.00015104895,0.0002684403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015273024,0.0003894661,0.00041579886,0.0007521861,0.006791746,0.007059068,0.00077689276,0.00536057,0.016020028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040919096,0.0003020139,0.00022723309,0.00092006195,0.008932039,0.008213647,0.003677941,0.006522793,0.0033491945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012149179,0.000012155402,0.00011757575,0.0000789577,0.0000020144066,0.00012862752,0.004992604,0.000021382342,0.000042800242,0.14118876,0.8390046,0.0143983895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003707085,0.000006792892,0.00042572813,0.0004255958,0.0000016339861,0.00015553838,0.005119748,0.000014506795,0.000028698429,0.02494127,0.96886694,0.00000980545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035399403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07055761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035399403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064527257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063826996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07038671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1162489397","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1316","title":"Legal Pluralism and Human Agency","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Normative; Plural; Pluralism (philosophy); Theme (computing); Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Scholarship; Agency (philosophy); Law and economics; Legal realism; Legal research; Political science; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02487907968279396,"score_gpt":0.305183783413715,"score_spread":0.28030470373092103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1162489397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061030753,0.009828305,0.040694073,0.08590057,0.00045755995,0.00007343909,0.00004280405,0.00007713133,0.8018953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97739834,0.0013293432,0.0047253007,0.0021421146,0.00030277617,0.00006902875,0.000019260358,0.000024678346,0.0139891375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860486,0.008625421,0.0004051034,0.0018452579,0.0019525688,0.0011231869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937972,0.0030150076,0.00070121046,0.0011082806,0.00064313563,0.0007351416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011837694,0.0003348821,0.00052045204,0.0016283488,0.0109608285,0.012256973,0.0012250036,0.0045960946,0.0034500102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00898784,0.0003153969,0.00062668376,0.0010952611,0.0742826,0.0077678794,0.008907573,0.0045552356,0.00041648457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014628237,0.000003919441,0.00008634933,0.0000058198234,0.000001706685,0.000019342513,0.0021874006,0.0000820159,0.000020719353,0.99585694,0.0004412962,0.0012930229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005618353,0.000005139662,0.00011229765,0.000027722474,0.0000019206102,0.000034662542,0.0013812024,0.00019007921,0.00003424013,0.9764242,0.021778734,0.0000042146107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041570393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012256973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059718494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071683857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06260443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W116455860","doi":"10.21991/c98h3r","title":"THE CHARTER’S BURDENS: THE RETURN TO THE \"PRESUMPTION OF VALIDITY\" IN SECTION 7 OF THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Presumption; Political science; Section (typography); Law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.04946066497352069,"score_gpt":0.2699278153999215,"score_spread":0.2204671504264008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W116455860","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014039635,0.0056618997,0.016910564,0.50263083,0.005519413,0.00021230697,0.00090657506,0.00018670368,0.45393205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51568025,0.005342772,0.032983672,0.29209092,0.006106763,0.00059980096,0.0008420801,0.0007441965,0.14560947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8747009,0.023733709,0.0051231696,0.010062355,0.07102827,0.015351513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8957339,0.040993776,0.0034204305,0.0077469996,0.04660412,0.0055006696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057831116,0.00113551,0.0022559382,0.0037540295,0.032297503,0.025191506,0.009834196,0.02991304,0.009712429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13462807,0.0024689152,0.0023291993,0.0037982191,0.05800484,0.013427194,0.008815187,0.046264645,0.0013764467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014435454,0.000012470918,0.00020398696,0.000029982153,0.000010430877,0.00004073639,0.0024392656,0.00024382351,0.000091263675,0.9447653,0.048573337,0.0035749124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011764877,0.00003166725,0.0037869336,0.00081541244,0.00009694614,0.00010406944,0.0032080598,0.0017185762,0.00057279697,0.5176945,0.47135806,0.0004953643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9580665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95212954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12379777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12379777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29451334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8982199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W117375820","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1020","title":"Social Justice and the Charter: Comparison and Choice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Law Foundation of British Columbia","keywords":"Charter; Injustice; Jurisprudence; Politics; Economic Justice; Political science; Contemplation; Law and economics; Law; Oppression; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03995650515247766,"score_gpt":0.33295987278218564,"score_spread":0.29300336762970797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W117375820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06405638,0.01125617,0.030837407,0.08329587,0.001806422,0.00014283249,0.00019201342,0.000084286854,0.8083286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96606797,0.0019235293,0.0063181175,0.0033252174,0.00075345894,0.00017531273,0.00007333493,0.00008528055,0.021277787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97315073,0.01613261,0.00066861976,0.0021297573,0.005928509,0.0019897495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98925227,0.006718365,0.00093464873,0.0011926736,0.00120599,0.0006960268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018399972,0.0005087876,0.0011127945,0.0045411815,0.010398889,0.020619588,0.0019908983,0.004666263,0.007009728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02629239,0.0003006605,0.0008975459,0.0036223272,0.066747725,0.020847952,0.00849091,0.006465355,0.00048657134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055861997,0.00000358914,0.000057628084,0.0000058167893,9.991282e-7,0.0000069071007,0.00071922323,0.000046311427,0.0000071306117,0.9970592,0.00057831564,0.0015092785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013952266,0.00001806684,0.0002568831,0.000068015725,0.000004009012,0.000015373274,0.0014300002,0.00030709684,0.00006822855,0.9712876,0.026518181,0.000012489436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0100004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008015204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9899996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014022087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009781492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10173786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W117897452","doi":"","title":"The Written Word and the Constitution's Vital Unstated Assumptions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Secession; Judicial independence; Jurisdiction; Legitimacy; Certiorari; Constitutionalism; Original jurisdiction; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.016703175072308618,"score_gpt":0.27265182767846075,"score_spread":0.2559486526061521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W117897452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044734053,0.017885953,0.02929661,0.25102174,0.002881856,0.00008227035,0.0006281965,0.00013225953,0.653337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92378753,0.005765302,0.007362421,0.018705923,0.0026223145,0.00017998967,0.00028923404,0.00012869539,0.04115861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98736167,0.0056559527,0.0007053448,0.0015346253,0.003346396,0.0013959489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98440707,0.009072631,0.001140291,0.002170631,0.0027025456,0.00050684257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008931676,0.00039599795,0.00060388946,0.002586274,0.0073725088,0.018231457,0.0019492185,0.0052994387,0.0059956163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02331477,0.00053963443,0.0004004446,0.0016355461,0.06364108,0.011388676,0.0038121683,0.009711979,0.00093613204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005055712,0.000003071329,0.00004285928,0.000012104012,0.0000013762963,0.000027175238,0.0012816045,0.00005494121,0.00004705766,0.99552804,0.0013168461,0.0016799116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020237247,0.0000147494575,0.0004954244,0.00027406035,0.000011021767,0.000066747234,0.0021340873,0.00031160348,0.0002955388,0.8901258,0.106218845,0.000031932534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044162296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035283033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044162296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012496506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012777898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09066886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1194035364","doi":"10.71781/1674","title":"Convergences et divergences dans les conceptions de la morale de Ronald Dworkin et Alasdair MacIntyre","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Theology; Psychology","score_opus":0.011219572975389008,"score_gpt":0.21916592921255457,"score_spread":0.20794635623716556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1194035364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.083382666,0.059608467,0.047423787,0.17273718,0.001379352,0.00006277062,0.00012936913,0.0000775726,0.63519883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90236133,0.017090771,0.012097496,0.0070300493,0.00036779605,0.0001324935,0.00005021041,0.000101821104,0.060768045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954093,0.0026587273,0.000106267275,0.0006000195,0.00091228134,0.0003132912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751484,0.001567161,0.00019739925,0.00017777737,0.00035082293,0.00019202419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042902897,0.00061831373,0.0005641475,0.0020599656,0.0052749375,0.010228355,0.0011235179,0.0033098953,0.003852936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005473514,0.000386066,0.00038242186,0.0017236607,0.02077696,0.009737718,0.0039174687,0.007496174,0.0006412483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010241969,0.000006613923,0.00013226636,0.000016339749,0.00000189864,0.000020004001,0.0072935796,0.000060220827,0.000033772416,0.9864296,0.0020411154,0.0039543137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015206687,0.000016600809,0.0011821445,0.00031291315,0.000008020976,0.00012998197,0.01203706,0.0005784261,0.0002242993,0.7967265,0.18872803,0.00004068248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011098139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0130181005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011098139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010408692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040892344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075520635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1203365843","doi":"10.20381/ruor-7754","title":"\"Les règles de la folie\" ou sur l'introduction du syndrome prémenstruel dans les cours canadiennes de justice.","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"uO Research (University of Ottawa)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04140649640362288,"score_gpt":0.32638365294830113,"score_spread":0.28497715654467826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1203365843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14203791,0.077787414,0.008498325,0.29720643,0.007177858,0.00019797016,0.00039317954,0.00020097001,0.46649995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8794208,0.016303306,0.0026905383,0.031826936,0.0012071071,0.00018204979,0.00011284319,0.00005546622,0.06820094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997456,0.0011770878,0.00009530533,0.00033289264,0.00048539406,0.00045329452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820054,0.0006772347,0.00044592516,0.0001308185,0.00026794386,0.0002774784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002856094,0.00041919912,0.00028621647,0.0015909169,0.0065161153,0.003709069,0.0007666934,0.0034900084,0.005715259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053239064,0.00014957489,0.00035582818,0.0011641025,0.021241046,0.0029329935,0.005451012,0.004896643,0.0006045273],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021598538,0.000015472093,0.0057771755,0.00022304551,0.000009187199,0.0012296975,0.111399435,0.000054840104,0.00062881055,0.8183888,0.02397817,0.038273685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011683996,0.00007887273,0.016060924,0.0013291673,0.000027745476,0.003029152,0.06748,0.000107666805,0.0006551235,0.094995975,0.8161667,0.00005697527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04081146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.069438376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9591885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046810936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009147632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08114779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1204211868","doi":"","title":"Locke, Hegel, and Rights to Property: Examining the Unstable Ideological Architecture of the Canadian Law of Aboriginal Title","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Supreme court; Law; Ideology; Alienation; Economic Justice; Political science; Sketch; Common law; Sociology; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.0361020778043293,"score_gpt":0.29859178862363817,"score_spread":0.2624897108193089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1204211868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2895897,0.018294748,0.0036036307,0.07938504,0.0002644938,0.000078649966,0.00013425757,0.000029289344,0.60862017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755152,0.0027647447,0.0008956483,0.0029226684,0.000045989975,0.00003568134,0.000023498882,0.000020453288,0.017776186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956644,0.0009022393,0.000057110134,0.00032295013,0.001288046,0.0017652257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99648154,0.0020445671,0.00021406371,0.0001115823,0.0007354095,0.000412792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037098937,0.00042890233,0.00051027664,0.0045914045,0.033769645,0.017406639,0.0027225942,0.0042867507,0.0025938225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072016995,0.00044159187,0.00035926263,0.004084639,0.08079306,0.005750653,0.004666832,0.005218527,0.00014862716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009861095,0.0000070782216,0.0009361542,0.000024799656,0.0000032612977,0.00015153721,0.07419746,0.00011583037,0.000102867234,0.9189419,0.0020501616,0.0034591134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006558953,0.00002977695,0.016975854,0.0006961451,0.00005040019,0.00020847976,0.28888324,0.0013176196,0.0005243323,0.44422406,0.24685696,0.00016751181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9797544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9899507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13660184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13660184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.082095884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99112034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W120566640","doi":"10.29173/alr101","title":"Gender in Automobile Insurance Underwriting: Some Insureds Are More Equal Than Others","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Underwriting; Business; Actuarial science; Insurance industry; Insurance policy; Variable (mathematics); Law; Political science","score_opus":0.052200477365829695,"score_gpt":0.3345803080456482,"score_spread":0.28237983067981853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W120566640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7254453,0.009055671,0.0014565676,0.054344777,0.00062335574,0.000024528703,0.00014481842,0.0000071646677,0.20889783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943843,0.00097047,0.00008165069,0.0024763937,0.000074213036,0.000003542606,0.000012004661,0.00000338565,0.0019941223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996302,0.0013643316,0.000084702246,0.00036511355,0.0010189976,0.0008648128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976197,0.00090994214,0.00044958838,0.000077045224,0.00038568836,0.00055809406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043489328,0.00013250398,0.0003149528,0.0011815801,0.004496322,0.00294783,0.00050388137,0.001135702,0.004153119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009248589,0.00010806317,0.00026107082,0.0009263257,0.0067398325,0.0021675301,0.0018198184,0.0015246846,0.00024184931],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025394853,0.00009776322,0.2818737,0.00013154575,0.00008744996,0.0008000361,0.095786676,0.0001730509,0.0009868493,0.49556664,0.017999774,0.106242575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044494143,0.00017952084,0.51706004,0.00096351694,0.0001369983,0.0016672484,0.23229133,0.0006089188,0.00091782486,0.10934538,0.13670634,0.000078399324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13465779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23065148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8653422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003474238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034701233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.267748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W122242722","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Peoples Tribal Self Government: Legal History and Public Policy Manifestations in Canada, New Zealand and the United States","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Sovereignty; Treaty; Government (linguistics); Politics; Colonialism; State (computer science); Public administration; Law; Indigenous rights; Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.008216530683902757,"score_gpt":0.23498168731177974,"score_spread":0.22676515662787697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W122242722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73345065,0.017583653,0.00037103271,0.046041626,0.0002848774,0.000100557394,0.00027939593,0.000037814327,0.20185046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782478,0.0050437697,0.00020162297,0.0015953843,0.000028666695,0.000020098569,0.00006629882,0.000018100145,0.014778285],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99682057,0.00034248663,0.00007799749,0.00027700205,0.001008725,0.0014731763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956508,0.0010151826,0.0003845075,0.00013121485,0.001615099,0.001203045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026626217,0.00018380122,0.0004515372,0.0029690785,0.024428304,0.008182049,0.001680285,0.0018285305,0.0033873874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065946,0.00027448268,0.00023864886,0.0053311987,0.020333134,0.002750425,0.0033758248,0.0037355672,0.000111013345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006017308,0.00011620033,0.022437474,0.0002974992,0.000039091978,0.0018793504,0.4809621,0.00047382183,0.00060782395,0.42258367,0.019699527,0.050843216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018119123,0.000041098316,0.14544882,0.00074298144,0.00005249306,0.0003937851,0.42667288,0.0008888483,0.00038830758,0.011869403,0.4132936,0.00018964663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19090165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19090165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17146899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93843937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W122937521","doi":"","title":"Les recours judiciaires des personnes autistes pour la reconnaissance de leurs droits dans des services socio-sanitaires et d'éducation au Québec et au Canada","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue francophone de la déficience intellectuelle","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.03662648210457323,"score_gpt":0.30358970182719547,"score_spread":0.26696321972262227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W122937521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9034927,0.0020954758,0.0011357581,0.029639727,0.00032631413,0.00009669903,0.00024013809,0.00002843334,0.062944725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97409636,0.000823316,0.0003385223,0.0021804306,0.000022858256,0.000024686478,0.000041655996,0.000011537309,0.022460703],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99411523,0.0018219551,0.00016982124,0.00039250834,0.0014569492,0.0020434775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99055964,0.001556109,0.0010271488,0.00032358954,0.0035533074,0.0029803147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037747142,0.00028470327,0.0003119073,0.0008294525,0.014343163,0.0044331253,0.0010369848,0.0013683009,0.006550445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0103490725,0.00025157267,0.00028713644,0.001171807,0.00594374,0.0010481466,0.0023635847,0.0028027857,0.00048628973],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014064275,0.00012081538,0.18290238,0.00023854562,0.000066233886,0.0021624349,0.6934981,0.00052085065,0.0022232998,0.025573485,0.025054393,0.06749884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014404063,0.00007192415,0.26057175,0.00056878274,0.00004866038,0.00049542123,0.58218646,0.00047891558,0.000708077,0.0013068505,0.15343364,0.00011505994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9621888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9835939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03781122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037224114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07285291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2700811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W123339044","doi":"10.29173/alr174","title":"Courting Confusion? Three Recent Alberta Cases on Equality Rights Post-Kapp","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Charter; Confusion; Political science; Prejudice (legal term); Sociology; Trial court; Economic Justice; Psychology","score_opus":0.054628161612341804,"score_gpt":0.36399043507164364,"score_spread":0.30936227345930184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W123339044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17417169,0.049056273,0.0020339843,0.20360835,0.002298317,0.00015246244,0.0004773611,0.00011098957,0.56809056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79653764,0.027635926,0.0019557406,0.09900757,0.0007643078,0.000079961996,0.00030840194,0.000060879236,0.07364958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920311,0.00075911684,0.00018565136,0.00047054284,0.0044906707,0.0020628832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910218,0.0037973297,0.0005008519,0.0002721176,0.003627384,0.0007804957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067760637,0.0002927442,0.0003755904,0.0024939314,0.016865607,0.007737991,0.003827208,0.0057251523,0.002969314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013144967,0.0005115955,0.00057962333,0.0037309546,0.009214387,0.0017473941,0.004260981,0.007083511,0.00023017774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081496175,0.000104013656,0.009430414,0.0005134415,0.000066140135,0.004273845,0.028810509,0.0013625069,0.0009825906,0.70019335,0.14850478,0.105677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008214653,0.00006606818,0.052236088,0.00096596644,0.00018832799,0.0010317062,0.026004003,0.0007200932,0.00136659,0.04073516,0.8763322,0.00027161496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9576792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9824453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07026789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07026789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08742531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50983167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W123532963","doi":"10.29173/alr152","title":"“The Maverick Constitution” — A Review of &lt;i&gt;Canadian Maverick: The Life and Times of Ivan C. Rand&lt;/i&gt;, William Kaplan","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03706977055129678,"score_gpt":0.3074291791335268,"score_spread":0.27035940858223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W123532963","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008219479,0.98694927,0.000031844782,0.005596262,0.0003387906,0.0000064751407,0.00007084823,0.0000040482273,0.006920314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005027081,0.98563933,0.00021158886,0.0041495636,0.00024247868,0.000025435584,0.00011033036,0.000007114878,0.004587081],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974868,0.00042312703,0.00011760496,0.0001651937,0.001532181,0.0002750322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975509,0.00067508925,0.00021088302,0.00007469799,0.0013227983,0.00016563752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036751865,0.000979145,0.0012949063,0.0068356995,0.0035563698,0.0059270756,0.0023923784,0.0027204768,0.006817365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069317813,0.0005781584,0.00044552772,0.015274428,0.0059985216,0.003036022,0.0014845189,0.0028374796,0.0011761911],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023647744,0.000016231883,0.00041443776,0.008698475,0.000064739754,0.00009937452,0.0007418593,0.00015122905,0.00013128863,0.10406679,0.66616327,0.21942866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003983399,0.0000039451206,0.001188232,0.0063184267,0.000029128098,0.00003895763,0.00026523016,0.000010985121,0.00003672254,0.0024171935,0.989678,0.000009113336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84346807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9281356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15653193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042308446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14768475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3149075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1237609878","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-17229-3_4","title":"Shifting Scrutiny: Private Ordering in Family Matters in Common-Law Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius comparatum","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Law; Political science; Family law; Private law; Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law","score_opus":0.07420934351758351,"score_gpt":0.3118252412727679,"score_spread":0.23761589775518438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1237609878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25788397,0.004639428,0.00267155,0.056864046,0.00030813142,0.00011056252,0.0004116241,0.00004899706,0.6770616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93349665,0.0011121342,0.00052,0.0035693813,0.00005954582,0.000027197662,0.00006177435,0.000039537208,0.06111381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99018466,0.0014796082,0.00014217974,0.000686654,0.0023175192,0.005189403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99330974,0.0026129484,0.00031559245,0.00038498925,0.0019061315,0.0014707076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039584893,0.0002734259,0.000647973,0.0023221902,0.03997646,0.016886812,0.0029039807,0.005903276,0.01661928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017653598,0.00052834215,0.00053840136,0.00649514,0.019030904,0.005259378,0.0057835714,0.0068781697,0.0005292166],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037386737,0.000053149175,0.007412935,0.00003794928,0.00002084697,0.0006059832,0.06785687,0.000730253,0.00012329221,0.85012954,0.0493313,0.023660468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038475573,0.000033560915,0.04706432,0.0005774384,0.000082170205,0.0003835148,0.27724487,0.0030271672,0.0006198603,0.27255338,0.39817047,0.00020475901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9879209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9943757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.118609145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.118609145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20689975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8605736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W12584622","doi":"10.4000/dictynna.216","title":"Women’s Networks in Vergil’s Aeneid","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dictynna","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principate; Elite; Politics; Context (archaeology); Relation (database); Latin Americans; Sociology; Gender studies; History; Literature; Political science; Art; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01639940661703336,"score_gpt":0.2735116099804253,"score_spread":0.2571122033633919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W12584622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91451746,0.0005325292,0.00021102381,0.0011349545,0.000053778618,0.000016116377,0.000031879797,0.00000580767,0.08349656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951721,0.000093211944,0.000048829854,0.000056227,0.000008732897,0.0000070883134,0.000013399722,0.0000033136034,0.0045971167],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924445,0.00034791007,0.000016169057,0.00009173621,0.000065376356,0.00023428544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957603,0.00017390851,0.00009647064,0.000022727663,0.00002120418,0.0001095531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068786886,0.00020246679,0.00028174624,0.001065199,0.008744942,0.003734453,0.0006053174,0.00119867,0.007644098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014153961,0.00027858844,0.00008572758,0.0008825828,0.005796986,0.0023797646,0.0039050463,0.0011714357,0.00037712147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001885403,0.00007854861,0.01777763,0.00009229041,0.0000064838587,0.0033948668,0.8753729,0.000096479154,0.0008991221,0.08382603,0.002517119,0.015750084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022561037,0.00009682162,0.04610648,0.00015997753,0.000008795793,0.0018101673,0.7447129,0.0002527689,0.0006038145,0.004525086,0.20167495,0.000025676372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007536559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020000199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008744942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003563454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005446089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025854766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W127118925","doi":"","title":"Anglican-Roman Catholic Dialogue in Canada *","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of ecumenical studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bishops; Prayer; Pastoral care; Sociology; Religious studies; Law; History; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.058408187748116215,"score_gpt":0.3463875032787219,"score_spread":0.2879793155306057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W127118925","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32252333,0.022590946,0.00090917025,0.09353434,0.0021468762,0.00014451452,0.00038214412,0.0000965916,0.5576721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.889225,0.0040901066,0.0006357413,0.008941349,0.000108029075,0.000039656643,0.00009965249,0.00005438045,0.09680613],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970452,0.0007118506,0.000047544658,0.00020090141,0.00064068416,0.0013538221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997242,0.00036064183,0.00009169428,0.000044400713,0.00072435394,0.0015370371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021282833,0.00029412057,0.0003129295,0.0010757467,0.04235187,0.0075529655,0.0013735959,0.002227511,0.009015145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031266343,0.00026440242,0.000177157,0.0023092818,0.007962981,0.0011925413,0.004766639,0.0035674144,0.00054556644],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014488248,0.00013222104,0.009451195,0.00029964428,0.000019861709,0.0046983217,0.48036134,0.00031013554,0.0011546677,0.2338752,0.20527004,0.06428251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013980201,0.000013256403,0.00740424,0.00016770477,0.000007805481,0.0003841146,0.19708669,0.00017742148,0.0002087454,0.0023421142,0.79214513,0.000048793838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98488647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12185868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12185868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14345616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88415074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W12959246","doi":"","title":"A Perspective on Ontario’s Adult Guardianship Law: The Role of Law in Adjudicating Disputes Caused by Old Men Marrying Young Women.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Law; Autonomy; Battle; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Political science; Doctrine; History","score_opus":0.019131374444605675,"score_gpt":0.2671430305343135,"score_spread":0.24801165608970782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W12959246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.109060824,0.025620496,0.003689896,0.14539249,0.0009939062,0.00018158164,0.00032385992,0.00002503112,0.7147119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82731485,0.02649493,0.0051064934,0.018708434,0.0003627283,0.00006930804,0.00013647399,0.000014514197,0.121792264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979882,0.0005640663,0.000054253458,0.0001262509,0.0005504884,0.0007167186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809617,0.0007178184,0.00021444472,0.0000722388,0.00049277925,0.0004065555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022158963,0.00022043585,0.00017155797,0.0010139134,0.008323273,0.0034084092,0.001280782,0.0031663026,0.0048128734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027701922,0.0002161752,0.00022621016,0.00134759,0.011879874,0.0015047287,0.0010281076,0.002094527,0.0002779997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046864097,0.00003476137,0.0050122775,0.00017464395,0.000005625196,0.002890875,0.022820601,0.00040881638,0.0024820594,0.9054174,0.030492166,0.030213973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015280108,0.00008418885,0.014767194,0.00025676063,0.000016253047,0.00076335476,0.027235487,0.0003960595,0.0014493528,0.046886798,0.90807813,0.000051058007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9336024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9826366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06639761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04639626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056975298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W136203849","doi":"","title":"Sans Foi, Ni Loi. Appearances of Conjugality and Lawless Love","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"De facto; Structural functionalism; Sanctions; Cornerstone; Law; Coercion (linguistics); Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; History; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.039520949558615376,"score_gpt":0.3116475423654978,"score_spread":0.27212659280688245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W136203849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05438947,0.0046981885,0.0023949316,0.020400593,0.00038144932,0.00002926534,0.000051610434,0.00004022665,0.91761434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8958917,0.0016638674,0.00047481398,0.0037649244,0.00013189188,0.000019800309,0.000023910441,0.000026172675,0.098002784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767286,0.0008527079,0.00005284878,0.0002599433,0.00056885404,0.0005928214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990588,0.00020223114,0.00012714625,0.00013461958,0.00021464418,0.00026253148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015686346,0.0002250798,0.00028326936,0.0006399384,0.011853619,0.006979397,0.000721852,0.0017003169,0.0076306895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002634271,0.00020885421,0.00027227815,0.000503546,0.041568853,0.0038630918,0.004376112,0.004225129,0.000954579],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013691115,0.000015074152,0.0010927789,0.00001627312,0.0000025448671,0.00021478381,0.031610765,0.000038270242,0.00014760453,0.9541935,0.004765612,0.007889077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023405686,0.00006935272,0.01688731,0.0003322142,0.000017804154,0.0010949215,0.07432249,0.000349573,0.0004933083,0.21481344,0.6915394,0.000056821304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19124891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2664234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19124891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013481232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004358523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38027138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W140235721","doi":"","title":"Le rôle de la volonté en matière d'adoption en droit français et en droit québécois","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Philosophy; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.009344705794648373,"score_gpt":0.2781490506837514,"score_spread":0.26880434488910304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W140235721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8749669,0.003931501,0.0013517358,0.012130762,0.00016219939,0.000058558468,0.0007236569,0.000039225015,0.10663548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9505378,0.0018172825,0.0006041584,0.00050005544,0.000022840046,0.000031566222,0.00017630337,0.000018828267,0.046291005],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986595,0.00031230148,0.000025678726,0.0001450615,0.00034928607,0.00050810823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965383,0.00048929336,0.00035033407,0.00010356112,0.0014743372,0.001044222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001469191,0.00022353654,0.0002447508,0.0012854892,0.0052919732,0.004213923,0.0009112274,0.00061357155,0.011427174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028740102,0.00016162716,0.00026877454,0.0017146848,0.0026964121,0.0011425018,0.001423338,0.0010649287,0.00055394456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020465221,0.00016473306,0.39532208,0.00026064293,0.00007664307,0.0013883297,0.19802189,0.0011519584,0.002912918,0.1697329,0.03267246,0.1980908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000078163575,0.00007683358,0.7170851,0.0005078296,0.000034943732,0.00017752,0.09241916,0.00068782177,0.0005621928,0.0016974712,0.18666627,0.00007699533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94871634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9766915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051283658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03394242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034560084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2462706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W140593061","doi":"10.1007/978-3-531-92139-6_4","title":"“At the Mercy of a Putative Majority:” Difference as a ‘Problem’ in Canadian Political Theory","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Normative; Scholarship; Politics; Political philosophy; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Accommodation; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Environmental ethics; Positive economics; Gender studies; Political economy; Law; Philosophy; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.021521448562784835,"score_gpt":0.30544463114016374,"score_spread":0.2839231825773789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W140593061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14876522,0.0036678119,0.043122448,0.1251264,0.001108223,0.00007324477,0.00013419561,0.00010385015,0.6778986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98307055,0.00037142247,0.0030518833,0.0015255691,0.000059234306,0.000012761652,0.000021291757,0.00002927061,0.011858025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939581,0.0019478048,0.00012582433,0.0007918495,0.002052048,0.0011243364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964736,0.0015345542,0.00017919562,0.0004312603,0.0009607272,0.00042057232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007778634,0.00037980633,0.00050023786,0.0017801615,0.020085843,0.00890461,0.0022287692,0.002450628,0.006717346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010093383,0.00022476372,0.0004637723,0.0026555602,0.056614287,0.0076015336,0.0044453186,0.0048728758,0.000359137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054742386,0.0000026320322,0.0002661301,0.000011318433,0.0000018262042,0.000015305868,0.007863031,0.00007713435,0.0000342341,0.98447984,0.0013302325,0.0059129056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014398501,0.000011409797,0.002710712,0.00009275901,0.00001568723,0.000090140165,0.019463846,0.0017051485,0.00026293786,0.89981383,0.07577739,0.00004177859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7410108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7787201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2589892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04783244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0360511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5210289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W141895517","doi":"","title":"The Bible, Disability, and the Church: A New Vision of the People of God by Amos Yong (review)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"People of God; Theology; Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013585404163910488,"score_gpt":0.31094100952235176,"score_spread":0.2973556053584413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W141895517","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000052134674,0.9973768,0.00000949827,0.0019649356,0.00040415986,0.0000011199121,0.0000024209742,4.0286244e-7,0.00018862984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012856121,0.99564844,0.00005387361,0.002076185,0.0006559645,0.000006150491,0.0000068667628,0.0000010858954,0.0002656959],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992162,0.0003848221,0.00009336608,0.000060949922,0.00018034822,0.00006422608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975077,0.0018933925,0.00021050859,0.00003081141,0.00021091352,0.00014662843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021591862,0.0007688971,0.001746831,0.002435976,0.0012711539,0.003101588,0.0009817582,0.003654177,0.0032465684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004681629,0.00030550093,0.00042826968,0.0038601442,0.003179931,0.004985968,0.0024711124,0.0040774816,0.000443924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015925642,0.000057328758,0.0004204797,0.04798797,0.00026155476,0.00030495008,0.0051339054,0.00012130458,0.00024623552,0.025579631,0.22532386,0.6944036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040153227,0.00006319514,0.0018941364,0.052265655,0.00017119132,0.00078999845,0.003741247,0.000027703307,0.000051194605,0.0042235698,0.9366942,0.000037827525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009381877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027080797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009381877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016989957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067543467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018654585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1454189359","doi":"","title":"Сущность правоспособности человека","year":2015,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Пространство и Время","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.0967094047343371,"score_gpt":0.3559397100637263,"score_spread":0.25923030532938923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1454189359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051227596,0.021385696,0.10866226,0.009979292,0.0019423689,0.00024487198,0.00084685994,0.00070163555,0.8050094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6762492,0.020646337,0.12256082,0.00096519775,0.0007590865,0.0005301275,0.0005557792,0.00043425697,0.17729928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988236,0.00025864528,0.00007309883,0.0001878577,0.00052387937,0.00013283454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928445,0.00020446515,0.00008861564,0.00012318935,0.00022924553,0.00007012153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011745996,0.00036471643,0.0002597294,0.0016951397,0.0018969381,0.0036912411,0.0004140652,0.0009510706,0.027138956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021485179,0.00042050504,0.00042115856,0.0021671143,0.0019985884,0.0015075412,0.0011082994,0.002122255,0.00747199],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067605375,0.00005417996,0.0011574584,0.00027745918,0.000025581674,0.000970117,0.0031714847,0.0006787794,0.0056912694,0.7398225,0.01860394,0.22947958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001904969,0.000027923787,0.0034452958,0.00016262697,0.00002684982,0.0009881586,0.0010515002,0.00073731743,0.0024680851,0.09928589,0.89174557,0.000041760202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007791068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00969551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027138956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017067969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031603076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09078884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1478234144","doi":"10.1017/s0731126500011574","title":"Aboriginal Rights in Canada: The Historical and Constitutional Contex†","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Information","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.011564853952167713,"score_gpt":0.27976600153279607,"score_spread":0.26820114758062835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1478234144","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31273508,0.04223642,0.0011482909,0.084671244,0.0008595018,0.0001288039,0.0022839685,0.00009499089,0.5558416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9046939,0.0109822955,0.00092029775,0.0036081953,0.000106778956,0.000031641892,0.00023831573,0.000056620658,0.079361916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641055,0.00029409616,0.000062539395,0.0002092203,0.0011316427,0.0018918964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959223,0.0007064486,0.00024455105,0.00015077624,0.0018789218,0.0010969022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001839707,0.00028050126,0.00042510257,0.002582434,0.023972007,0.00895168,0.0014834144,0.0017235844,0.0108262645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045014815,0.00038025575,0.0002473781,0.0063981563,0.0095241,0.0018068098,0.0021434308,0.0036247598,0.00042313102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103695056,0.000056823723,0.022847729,0.00040519622,0.000035564975,0.0010828277,0.09943989,0.00057638285,0.0004433293,0.6926778,0.096493766,0.085837044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026091175,0.000034639572,0.113432065,0.0010859848,0.00008039437,0.0005341674,0.09513364,0.0009114696,0.00051363587,0.024260871,0.7638297,0.00015735922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9985266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99951315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16563097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16563097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27357894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96774983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1478590537","doi":"","title":"Introduction to: The Dignity of Law: The Legacy of Justice Louis LeBel","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Supreme court; Political science; Economic Justice; Ideology; Dignity; Politics; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.03090613688318201,"score_gpt":0.31617122611205795,"score_spread":0.28526508922887595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1478590537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033871369,0.13676679,0.004342369,0.34274322,0.08516003,0.00011969306,0.00077494263,0.00034696222,0.426359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0852606,0.08261931,0.0036238385,0.1666777,0.07865576,0.00018524604,0.0006419653,0.00084211177,0.5814935],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998372,0.0004009454,0.00005891714,0.00022545458,0.00075300894,0.00018963519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968635,0.0016688094,0.000104309496,0.00011073391,0.0009390425,0.00031363583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015416471,0.0006241799,0.0005509468,0.0021762715,0.0062390887,0.008076201,0.0009452704,0.003631029,0.013552234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059992666,0.00030443212,0.00036050117,0.0012065765,0.005148545,0.0031401585,0.0022542365,0.0069254357,0.00464328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010388395,0.000015778895,0.00015672244,0.00010026544,0.0000033589215,0.000092620954,0.0019130958,0.000066733686,0.00017953826,0.08386427,0.88761175,0.025985481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001231513,0.000005733661,0.00015008732,0.00029185478,0.0000011406233,0.00004017493,0.00047203703,0.000021001302,0.000044031265,0.0057282946,0.9932361,0.000008207429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029263081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05370402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029263081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010044258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006540687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07287657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480104160","doi":"","title":"The Covenanters in Canada: Reformed Presbyterianism from 1820 to 2012 by Eldon Hay (review)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hay; Theology; Philosophy; Animal science; Biology","score_opus":0.011117849865169185,"score_gpt":0.2740857521529374,"score_spread":0.26296790228776823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480104160","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049324506,0.94324946,0.00011000266,0.03527067,0.0018753288,0.000015805621,0.00026347677,0.000010464936,0.014272342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09410542,0.87370014,0.0003813476,0.017703436,0.0010269937,0.000024946034,0.0003138916,0.000033834807,0.012710005],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630547,0.00040850264,0.0001936111,0.0003393573,0.0015647073,0.0011884314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946268,0.0007708518,0.0004505404,0.00011581901,0.0031908425,0.0008451456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003394592,0.00081477105,0.0011864959,0.0042577353,0.00827341,0.007555818,0.0022198143,0.0032954877,0.0048001963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008869611,0.00062964065,0.00053239823,0.012797064,0.010350797,0.0033602654,0.0027856883,0.004898818,0.00046189726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013746052,0.000041150197,0.003761501,0.0061500575,0.0001865142,0.00040851464,0.01503184,0.00091524894,0.0001648872,0.0939981,0.42837918,0.45082563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018718467,0.000016212342,0.019081231,0.010885697,0.00015518501,0.00017258269,0.008348921,0.00007952758,0.00012924083,0.0032603426,0.9577602,0.00009215819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99614847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099138066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.099138066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3527059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7193004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480693685","doi":"10.21991/cf29363","title":"McIvor v. Canada and the 2010 Amendments to the Indian Act: A Half-Hearted Remedy to Historical Injustice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Injustice; Indigenous; Plaintiff; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Inheritance (genetic algorithm)","score_opus":0.022561630482639816,"score_gpt":0.2761986025802654,"score_spread":0.2536369720976256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480693685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03924728,0.010244868,0.001606573,0.19027342,0.0019312883,0.00010021813,0.00060032075,0.00014570268,0.7558503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44952998,0.003776115,0.0018470905,0.12132248,0.00037182207,0.00008209866,0.00023155467,0.00012701727,0.42271176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939957,0.00062918384,0.0001234224,0.0004843105,0.0024818142,0.002285491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709785,0.0007754319,0.00016537607,0.00017704976,0.0011163051,0.0006679931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029315476,0.0004039447,0.00030995437,0.0011631653,0.025462609,0.007864431,0.0020359987,0.008927705,0.0061426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073906486,0.00045016644,0.00054364844,0.0015577007,0.012572712,0.0021039546,0.002739334,0.0095827505,0.0005216303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003607612,0.000015439242,0.0010784704,0.000047591286,0.000008972711,0.00037055332,0.008917267,0.0001759143,0.00035140055,0.8004785,0.17757376,0.01094608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026646863,0.000014904632,0.004890589,0.00019920472,0.000029136416,0.000120205885,0.0048593213,0.00020248439,0.00069091696,0.019840099,0.96904635,0.000080118385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98862785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99549437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06677981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06677981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15553133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48452365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1481688350","doi":"10.7202/010265ar","title":"L’union de fait au Québec : inexistence dans le Code civil","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Civil code; Art; Law","score_opus":0.01536078176300917,"score_gpt":0.2538776298749263,"score_spread":0.23851684811191712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1481688350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78379035,0.0017957388,0.0014978484,0.015912268,0.00010891224,0.000049723378,0.00044157734,0.000014040849,0.19638956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9589096,0.0005333662,0.00026996012,0.000751494,0.00001318007,0.00003403627,0.00006773964,0.000007754055,0.039412897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724776,0.00065999676,0.000061545776,0.00022738185,0.0007543836,0.0010488284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956737,0.0015584121,0.00057994295,0.00019085298,0.0013847427,0.0006122218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021747148,0.00014324635,0.00021492402,0.0018652988,0.012638473,0.0042311475,0.00070949126,0.0011859868,0.007840778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054905973,0.00019143421,0.00013281035,0.0028626607,0.0063133324,0.0014894267,0.0021454808,0.0015499671,0.00020821994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005408723,0.000050752624,0.090034865,0.00014864028,0.000020614658,0.00079286756,0.35656732,0.000438474,0.00084309693,0.4680352,0.019318251,0.06369575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010570102,0.000049917464,0.28551802,0.0005402455,0.000021451753,0.00031502702,0.29768652,0.00056817755,0.00058748364,0.007826768,0.4068042,0.00007155203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96088946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98529565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03911054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035605762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03458808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25833905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483016405","doi":"","title":"The British North America Act and the Protection of Individual Rights: The Canadian Bill of Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ValpoScholar (Valparaiso University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Political science; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.029340698577219673,"score_gpt":0.21671852298845154,"score_spread":0.18737782441123185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483016405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012923686,0.01736404,0.0012844348,0.14240475,0.0023081603,0.00012210423,0.0005877636,0.000061094725,0.822944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3794857,0.013766082,0.0048839077,0.113486625,0.0010857224,0.0003066557,0.00043125005,0.00020571385,0.48634833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98632264,0.0018732343,0.00040581622,0.0009709452,0.0064401403,0.003987287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906126,0.0023777895,0.00027236505,0.0006610873,0.004203405,0.0018727545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005835638,0.0006596674,0.0008181215,0.002094468,0.021115137,0.013717976,0.0024994726,0.015709747,0.013354376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017797519,0.00095988676,0.00062522216,0.0037420075,0.018305792,0.004308837,0.0038260987,0.012783506,0.0013797448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022020133,0.000019874322,0.0006111278,0.000047837337,0.00000795517,0.000094461655,0.002921537,0.00017007477,0.00008945206,0.88108355,0.1046813,0.0102508515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034777047,0.0000122741885,0.0065906215,0.000595511,0.00002911895,0.00007976945,0.0027395831,0.00032018585,0.00012353237,0.087639466,0.90172994,0.00010515007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98136514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066857696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.066857696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19884437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48508883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483023927","doi":"10.22201/cisan.24487228e.2007.02.80","title":"North American Convergence, Revisited","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013660880786750054,"score_gpt":0.2894770806268748,"score_spread":0.2758161998401248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483023927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17067766,0.014394208,0.0027276983,0.031578388,0.0011583439,0.000017920525,0.00013443791,0.000049370145,0.779262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707634,0.0066155177,0.00089382764,0.004314133,0.00063048914,0.000039673138,0.00009565992,0.00007277492,0.016574621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567896,0.0017428888,0.0001621064,0.00063643634,0.0009955668,0.0007840371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99612075,0.0010663908,0.00043469976,0.00037813393,0.0016252601,0.000374646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004906297,0.00031578986,0.0005995821,0.004350306,0.006763012,0.0045473073,0.0008262013,0.00077731226,0.010156787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010049901,0.00016861159,0.00030646945,0.0059463545,0.00855158,0.0059980294,0.0063496768,0.0032321417,0.0006026122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006784767,0.000029998542,0.012801527,0.00017802615,0.00003182851,0.00049398595,0.09016399,0.00015071251,0.00016200844,0.8058173,0.017192766,0.07291011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028456612,0.000054917142,0.052379154,0.0015439917,0.00007469557,0.0016726931,0.15064432,0.0004172292,0.00048221063,0.21765585,0.57500017,0.000046303252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033613235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033232667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9663868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048241555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031063654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066835165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483387903","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Peoples and the Law - Ancient Customs: Modern Dilemmas","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Political science; Indigenous rights; International law; Human rights; Ecology","score_opus":0.02116207358008191,"score_gpt":0.28498214808666983,"score_spread":0.2638200745065879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483387903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2676684,0.045053035,0.0020103315,0.25534147,0.0009411515,0.000032436423,0.00002701556,0.000029138782,0.42889693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98349285,0.004619382,0.00041415295,0.0039655,0.0004364957,0.000009752142,0.0000037059358,0.000007784515,0.00705044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946075,0.0028466345,0.0001661364,0.0004677551,0.0010218401,0.0008901715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99572754,0.0024654502,0.00040586095,0.00030270108,0.00044660593,0.0006518955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006933748,0.00023433594,0.0005670335,0.0017524034,0.017649034,0.007612582,0.001185023,0.0044398652,0.0036973152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076001384,0.00028013403,0.00025973856,0.0018417966,0.10259911,0.008495134,0.005757792,0.005394828,0.00020617995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008436319,0.000029317114,0.00071544194,0.000053469135,0.000005836126,0.0003717374,0.13009301,0.00008049919,0.000048174734,0.857109,0.0023807285,0.00910439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021041884,0.000033667835,0.0037480323,0.0005135233,0.0000135638875,0.00088662,0.16727991,0.00022004932,0.00008786085,0.69053406,0.13661595,0.000045763107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04642874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053309895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04642874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009891112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006714642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092316985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485315654","doi":"10.21991/c9908s","title":"CONSTITUTIONALIZING THE PATRIARCHY: ABORIGINAL WOMEN AND ABORIGINAL GOVERNMENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Patriarchy; Government (linguistics); Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028147571320146187,"score_gpt":0.3002645235946371,"score_spread":0.27211695227449095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485315654","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21485534,0.018914446,0.0031278648,0.2945902,0.0012923896,0.000110624984,0.000054053722,0.000030639367,0.4670245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771962,0.0018953839,0.00041983748,0.0054361853,0.00029538103,0.000058086756,0.000009006238,0.000015474201,0.014674431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98782456,0.007999218,0.00021508559,0.00051965774,0.0007625268,0.0026789554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99140304,0.006346179,0.0006171428,0.00041113654,0.00047044366,0.00075204356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01719998,0.00045457497,0.00074754265,0.001300112,0.026897876,0.019215945,0.0022778562,0.011328303,0.0056492914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018726919,0.00054418034,0.00058877823,0.002378272,0.10362873,0.0099020265,0.00998315,0.014958604,0.00024094155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000098466035,0.000014077571,0.00020662881,0.000023541032,0.0000027087485,0.00010790792,0.10001189,0.000043465476,0.000057840036,0.8970025,0.0011594507,0.0013600993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006196291,0.00006034265,0.002764657,0.0004624479,0.00003384425,0.00020321198,0.29636407,0.0002219771,0.00030030403,0.5868457,0.112620935,0.000060472503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18856524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1919559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9832303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016769735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04107713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3749354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485624013","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.16985311","title":"Recognising Non-Conjugal Relationships in New Zealand: Should We Extend the Rights and Responsibilities of Marriage and Marriage-Like Relationships to Other Caring Relationships?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Interdependence; Sexual relationship; Social psychology; Marital relationship; Psychology; Gender studies; Sociology; Human sexuality; Political science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.08105041365163404,"score_gpt":0.3361863285717185,"score_spread":0.2551359149200845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485624013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3307876,0.018868914,0.0100000985,0.23503195,0.0035597738,0.00036306193,0.00013213455,0.000060769864,0.40119576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.904047,0.022905152,0.009739754,0.012986339,0.0006002034,0.00018236681,0.00010634542,0.000053346193,0.04937953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950656,0.0014117472,0.0003296221,0.00042529858,0.0017655678,0.001002139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944371,0.0011514736,0.0012579969,0.000540367,0.0012338287,0.0013792145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007930567,0.0003982364,0.0007688752,0.0011675507,0.00600905,0.007957503,0.002059163,0.0024312735,0.006178793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014599835,0.00040590586,0.0006172662,0.001088034,0.018285858,0.012190882,0.006611493,0.0054077823,0.0008327942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006437579,0.0001674814,0.024828667,0.00074202823,0.000023171964,0.0020662497,0.31229544,0.00026605636,0.0017831271,0.3767454,0.016461043,0.26455703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026085007,0.00015080719,0.07188596,0.003050846,0.000036131336,0.001959093,0.35677525,0.00052897906,0.0008015587,0.06627586,0.49834728,0.00016212194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2913689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4677279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2913689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010943648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031164642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5793459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W148650106","doi":"10.21991/c98d5g","title":"THE HARD CASE OF DEFINING “THE MÉTIS PEOPLE” AND THEIR RIGHTS: A COMMENT ON R. V. POWLEY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Treaty; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Task (project management); Constitutional law; Business; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.036990190960873595,"score_gpt":0.2787448181654569,"score_spread":0.2417546272045833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W148650106","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029417824,0.004778913,0.00043095538,0.9618957,0.0042237476,0.000042461645,0.00015603413,0.00003799387,0.025492411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027506005,0.0015860369,0.0006685987,0.94055164,0.0019250015,0.00006863971,0.000054166383,0.0000621145,0.027577726],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98751396,0.0026182262,0.00050801685,0.0018919533,0.0049993796,0.0024685466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983714,0.011231076,0.0005655392,0.00039418184,0.0027537246,0.001341522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014333359,0.0011792667,0.0014057504,0.0012815808,0.032183293,0.010453892,0.008955526,0.045493785,0.0063344063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023285905,0.0013644808,0.0012340359,0.0022710639,0.02988563,0.007902419,0.0051647434,0.06319771,0.0017796457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042831314,0.000023492328,0.0003629049,0.000114108174,0.000012952753,0.000380752,0.01744988,0.000105782914,0.00040856635,0.21946391,0.7561638,0.0054710037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009209634,0.00003947179,0.0024160605,0.0006387522,0.000054277236,0.0002306887,0.015916724,0.00028280047,0.0009352815,0.040518507,0.9386768,0.00019862727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8464224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91255826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15357763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03468467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.083997525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30896413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487492807","doi":"","title":"Equality & Incrementalism: The Role of Common Law Reasoning in Constitutional Rights Cases","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Charter; Law; Constitutionality; Incrementalism; Political science; Common law; Constitutional law; Substantive due process; Supreme court; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01867545833179055,"score_gpt":0.30623375121270685,"score_spread":0.2875582928809163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1487492807","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12394327,0.0051328856,0.20139934,0.1380007,0.00084413413,0.00037718797,0.000081984246,0.00017605913,0.5300445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819049,0.00046123654,0.009908879,0.0035870355,0.0005081243,0.00014733797,0.000015968246,0.000030234107,0.0034362664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.944934,0.032651827,0.0016476851,0.004761628,0.010008618,0.0059962436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9133266,0.074305646,0.0027237989,0.004839385,0.003079966,0.0017246951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055989575,0.0005598667,0.0009450746,0.0051890872,0.012955048,0.022323018,0.005231504,0.012473654,0.0041242447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08649123,0.0009261223,0.0016909619,0.0028556758,0.105958946,0.0378455,0.017602386,0.015884552,0.00031991926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021840374,0.0000047137346,0.00007530842,0.000004678287,0.0000013795324,0.000044119886,0.0007815796,0.000100091085,0.000011815716,0.9978783,0.00017428483,0.000921412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010229877,0.000006128869,0.000116156465,0.000038216767,0.0000049110736,0.000030722502,0.0005352814,0.00091703446,0.000078377954,0.9942187,0.0040347134,0.0000095454125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020299854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013721326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055989575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019701798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014866645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29610473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488242185","doi":"","title":"D.B.S. v. S.R.G.: Promoting Women's Equality through the Automatic Recalculation of Child Support","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Child support; Charter; Appeal; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Legislature; Political science; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Lawmaking; Family law; Equity (law); Sociology","score_opus":0.027027290000685083,"score_gpt":0.31183359763010565,"score_spread":0.28480630762942055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488242185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13661589,0.0062395884,0.0048970557,0.17972589,0.00094925566,0.00016538151,0.00014264678,0.00012913144,0.6711351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80878305,0.0020872157,0.002830544,0.09325427,0.0001908651,0.00009500119,0.00003975367,0.000041074305,0.0926782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961494,0.0006201513,0.00008959945,0.00041566053,0.001497857,0.0012271549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981192,0.0010354143,0.00014533602,0.0000888101,0.00031800297,0.00029322362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035234904,0.00029454488,0.00025789527,0.0007810058,0.011955216,0.0059214593,0.0019982888,0.009492378,0.002080845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059479782,0.00041815144,0.00037263698,0.0009396918,0.014959271,0.0012301697,0.0038623419,0.0073843054,0.00029514896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013555063,0.000015300497,0.0021568367,0.000030729716,0.0000056677914,0.00047124198,0.010651574,0.00024926523,0.0007221037,0.95406055,0.020329122,0.011294061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011719509,0.00012818836,0.019296445,0.00042268386,0.00008352177,0.0007449804,0.0140457405,0.0011950389,0.00345824,0.16755946,0.7927951,0.00015327761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81070346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8941852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81070346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023570491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056985144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38082266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1490829653","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1149","title":"Bruker v. Marcovitz: Divorce and the Marriage of Law and Religion","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Economic Justice; Free Exercise Clause; Judaism; Sociology; First amendment","score_opus":0.037822127731152407,"score_gpt":0.3085275067277466,"score_spread":0.2707053789965942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1490829653","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024259014,0.7174044,0.00035537384,0.08400855,0.00087732816,0.000050131057,0.00019601232,0.000017203522,0.17283197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46010354,0.4332565,0.00048416914,0.058819305,0.00081202324,0.00010238748,0.00019854748,0.000019316076,0.046204183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830616,0.00040984034,0.00007178949,0.0001492496,0.0007361205,0.00032681946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835086,0.000924449,0.00019539488,0.00004024479,0.00036726796,0.0001217962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019852775,0.00024810893,0.00035239695,0.001883644,0.0049120393,0.002974416,0.001090484,0.0036967234,0.00328805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066170976,0.00022549245,0.00030020394,0.0028204676,0.005806971,0.0015175157,0.0012860321,0.0032585955,0.00036500758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004619731,0.000034138364,0.0038279567,0.0012374596,0.00003516283,0.00087728945,0.005952701,0.0003127362,0.0003863471,0.76847094,0.12880953,0.09000955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000612265,0.000041047006,0.027092073,0.004822621,0.00007334558,0.0005187044,0.005071402,0.00017176934,0.00042598363,0.037769333,0.92389965,0.00005286961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71136713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7944068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71136713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013897157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033809345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58066535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492053074","doi":"","title":"A Colonial Reading of Recent Jurisprudence: Sparrow, Delgamuukw and Haida Nation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Supreme court; Sovereignty; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Vision; Narrative; Denial; Politics; Sociology; Anthropology; Art","score_opus":0.03082915170291123,"score_gpt":0.3141191444428152,"score_spread":0.28328999273990396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492053074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07917808,0.110560596,0.0024322562,0.19364783,0.0028897729,0.000039550792,0.00008833112,0.000050030794,0.61111367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90526116,0.022367936,0.0011279008,0.01941228,0.00094561116,0.00003355585,0.000030126295,0.00006580646,0.05075556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980926,0.0006402035,0.00005092684,0.00027394888,0.0005189868,0.00042336824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973346,0.0015737816,0.00013200643,0.000110424546,0.0005877548,0.00026140345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002075569,0.00031291638,0.00037650234,0.0011338335,0.026091602,0.009508119,0.0014377087,0.00266142,0.0025131544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004506262,0.00034012328,0.00014313098,0.0019007084,0.04552155,0.004296621,0.0024667718,0.0065524466,0.00017228762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000083091645,0.000009625461,0.0005140286,0.000051759373,0.00000273992,0.00028662736,0.088325925,0.00009402609,0.00011284379,0.8901899,0.014102617,0.006301579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010090405,0.000014922384,0.003102974,0.0005503576,0.000010003243,0.00030314262,0.05187213,0.00033569807,0.00017884152,0.07325612,0.87032837,0.00003742139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8609783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9065357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1390217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06551927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035386696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4753778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492178389","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1057","title":"Old and Difficult Grievances: Examining the Relationship Between the Métis and the Crown","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Biotech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Law; Crown (dentistry); Happening; Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; Accommodation; History; Psychology; Performance art; Medicine; Archaeology","score_opus":0.09662400643991144,"score_gpt":0.33916711180796166,"score_spread":0.24254310536805024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492178389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.579933,0.019131359,0.00095248356,0.049554467,0.00027120797,0.000045395722,0.000030418476,0.0000071070544,0.3500747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912175,0.002004621,0.00012734876,0.0018818899,0.00004776412,0.000010822693,0.0000049832574,0.0000033056426,0.0047017625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99229264,0.0037349288,0.00012160906,0.00034424794,0.0013520444,0.0021544716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99241394,0.004447656,0.0009486459,0.00016233412,0.0011253477,0.0009020665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005579777,0.00020106511,0.00034650293,0.0023520521,0.028536668,0.009577131,0.0016129245,0.004175396,0.003089213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014329418,0.00027017682,0.0002852086,0.0022733838,0.04142647,0.0073585114,0.006892255,0.007064815,0.00017799292],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016241323,0.000042914828,0.0070388312,0.00006240166,0.000009865526,0.002161702,0.31166202,0.00012928876,0.00013803676,0.66294473,0.004913092,0.010880854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011948877,0.00006431851,0.033996668,0.0006152749,0.000036533966,0.0009833402,0.7229348,0.00029034165,0.00022790002,0.095635764,0.14515093,0.00005210471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3426493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59019905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65735066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032876283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023427973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6813097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496416790","doi":"","title":"Is it in force? 2002 : a guide to the commencement of statutes passed since 1st January 1977 : (incorporating Statutes Not Yet In Force)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Entomology and Zoology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Synod; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Statute of limitations; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04562816419820226,"score_gpt":0.34277757524697716,"score_spread":0.2971494110487749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496416790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029794353,0.05496532,0.027335437,0.038695253,0.05362211,0.0039406675,0.07478563,0.008027485,0.7356487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007607509,0.04143363,0.03267886,0.013850217,0.0043683397,0.003257136,0.05698033,0.0038871814,0.83593684],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99524504,0.000758797,0.00082857814,0.000273191,0.0024565626,0.00043770464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99150825,0.0020424235,0.0008626074,0.0005818961,0.0044003483,0.000604483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060396423,0.0013394246,0.0011000443,0.0062309373,0.002888172,0.008341322,0.0018165722,0.0036802937,0.074497655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014879569,0.0021627613,0.00077794853,0.0072569735,0.002397616,0.0055333353,0.0018829331,0.0064644697,0.15308091],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015340936,0.000022942884,0.00017590376,0.0001563727,0.0000014447522,0.00005028881,0.00045292056,0.00006910803,0.0002693077,0.006014692,0.94027364,0.052498143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000299781,0.0000077434925,0.00061915396,0.00017896047,8.737513e-7,0.000028751034,0.000124435,0.000016037746,0.000057672565,0.0004266334,0.9985267,0.000009978948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07513506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07452663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07513506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074317665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018427566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24921948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497485189","doi":"10.20381/ruor-19922","title":"The sacramental seal of confession from the Canadian civil law perspective","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"uO Research (University of Ottawa)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confession (law); Perspective (graphical); Law; Seal (emblem); Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Public law; History; Art; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06584671008831361,"score_gpt":0.36469829122743,"score_spread":0.2988515811391164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497485189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038393155,0.012141044,0.0024159204,0.081741504,0.0005926896,0.00006862602,0.00025654054,0.00005399005,0.8643366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86455804,0.010244696,0.003357462,0.008697244,0.00025474728,0.000043370954,0.00012521684,0.00006236246,0.112656794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940923,0.00080804975,0.00013523661,0.00050329656,0.0025143023,0.0019467954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99378294,0.0013235307,0.0003424977,0.0003011727,0.0030267835,0.0012231882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034087528,0.0004849815,0.00043546737,0.004540716,0.03300263,0.01484515,0.0022479596,0.00425585,0.012813961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009949637,0.0004950381,0.0004036427,0.0042501995,0.036282144,0.004565156,0.004233619,0.0055974894,0.00078596245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008919395,0.000007768891,0.0012600739,0.00005191454,0.0000042079437,0.00029147603,0.020059884,0.00016032107,0.00012389504,0.947339,0.015848354,0.014844177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009745289,0.000017694822,0.009917522,0.0004943083,0.000025149555,0.00041999458,0.041231308,0.00062114553,0.00034155187,0.077752955,0.86904824,0.000120400655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99633455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18424863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18424863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24403913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94615597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497674929","doi":"","title":"Oorwin negatiewe gedagtes : uit die Woord","year":2005,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Die Kerkblad","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03638166203112332,"score_gpt":0.3162884484199591,"score_spread":0.2799067863888358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497674929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1908163,0.011424693,0.0014432463,0.24905622,0.0015029428,0.000038489754,0.00043010022,0.0000414547,0.54524666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5644871,0.0037068485,0.0007453361,0.023478065,0.00014697442,0.000045040888,0.00017593085,0.00007402957,0.4071407],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870884,0.0004958266,0.000031040632,0.00013584326,0.0002754981,0.0003529084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986916,0.00032430232,0.00013477096,0.0000706423,0.0003418472,0.00043687117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014404249,0.00021925758,0.00021257946,0.00043814685,0.011609438,0.0050854767,0.00054023066,0.0021153379,0.017458476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003092231,0.00023428944,0.00013022638,0.0006072651,0.008116209,0.0033041525,0.0030338706,0.0031814037,0.0024282928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041538653,0.00008263958,0.011353958,0.00011900599,0.000012570754,0.0009298306,0.43545184,0.000038140774,0.0010233689,0.30375543,0.20002224,0.04716943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045525726,0.000012417569,0.0063561434,0.00013396467,0.000005286327,0.00023768903,0.16424328,0.000029167339,0.0002916185,0.0062677544,0.8224035,0.0000146472485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19241472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44742024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19241472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006379295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008547753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38258946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498532345","doi":"","title":"MEETING POINTS BETWEEN THE TRADITIONS OF ENGLISH–AMERICAN COMMON LAW AND CONTINENTAL-FRENCH CIVIL LAW. Developments and the experience of postmodernity in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Supreme court; Multiculturalism; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Comparative law; Sociology; Public law","score_opus":0.03298547501506394,"score_gpt":0.2771350715746441,"score_spread":0.24414959655958018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498532345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23692009,0.020999478,0.0047918386,0.14606941,0.0006989962,0.000067943765,0.000308455,0.00014244048,0.5900013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94652444,0.0016308487,0.0006662368,0.003164893,0.000056079705,0.00001594654,0.000029502758,0.000040521176,0.04787155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952533,0.0012374017,0.0000777447,0.0004813742,0.0013025469,0.0016475961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99556524,0.0012903557,0.00035464772,0.00015873076,0.001573069,0.0010579685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036059837,0.0004738979,0.0002924075,0.0018352161,0.033990044,0.013806599,0.0018258239,0.002904906,0.0077089895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005388878,0.00024197546,0.00027183487,0.0033769766,0.03899421,0.0038332646,0.003737557,0.0041767387,0.00047757063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041110972,0.000024913674,0.0023316587,0.00004838977,0.000007329924,0.00047098153,0.20105687,0.00016578312,0.0003450031,0.7640405,0.015173342,0.016294096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012153723,0.000028638455,0.012247227,0.00023628463,0.000017224838,0.00030152375,0.19353381,0.00060249877,0.00043454007,0.04201996,0.75048697,0.00007923743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98514056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.990244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17608576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17608576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13386875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95562375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502653743","doi":"10.1300/j396v22n02_04","title":"The Regulation of Fee and Comparative Advertising","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Services Marketing Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Charter; Promotion (chess); Advertising; Law; Business; Political science; Public relations","score_opus":0.021594185110758904,"score_gpt":0.29734298326547853,"score_spread":0.27574879815471964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502653743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18255591,0.0022996105,0.003966736,0.010168231,0.00012238382,0.000071271024,0.00010457776,0.000047962087,0.8006634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972233,0.00037927084,0.00082596054,0.002105358,0.000058342397,0.000031639483,0.000029930245,0.000008825034,0.024327649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99024194,0.0019556433,0.00038747225,0.0006399792,0.0053702495,0.0014047133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98221546,0.007990039,0.0022332317,0.0016396957,0.004914846,0.0010067447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004109461,0.0001567544,0.0001893482,0.0018881228,0.005054528,0.007050223,0.00083056645,0.0019058228,0.0075172773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015639069,0.00022325538,0.00018948276,0.001254242,0.010225918,0.0015425758,0.0021413076,0.002249529,0.00039845362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004634558,0.0000830633,0.0136335185,0.000065596025,0.000008699959,0.00022331967,0.009096878,0.00030528984,0.0020623512,0.92998296,0.007342177,0.03714994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004741555,0.00016989103,0.2061304,0.00076127454,0.000079669466,0.0011592851,0.01352955,0.002396284,0.0037571404,0.20695306,0.5648604,0.00015563026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2629091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010612453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009874982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44463676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502708317","doi":"","title":"The \"trickle is worth noting\": Common Law and Consumerism in Early Newfoundland History","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Érudit (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Consumerism; Environmental ethics; TRICKLE; Law; History; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010161994371923734,"score_gpt":0.19915696515249856,"score_spread":0.18899497078057484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502708317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4939168,0.021581993,0.00075183815,0.14697917,0.0004443021,0.000020774261,0.00022769017,0.0000387943,0.3360387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90629154,0.0033163694,0.00033019957,0.0063235858,0.00011105511,0.0000126881605,0.00003817323,0.000035351837,0.08354104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897826,0.00028897266,0.000027117629,0.00010918758,0.00011381367,0.00048262067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736804,0.0015201381,0.00020592441,0.00013220818,0.00034296344,0.0004306659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014354761,0.00019578985,0.00029110158,0.0019851131,0.016557632,0.008715664,0.0008485197,0.0025230295,0.012963691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024288232,0.0003135967,0.0001680024,0.0033095793,0.027673338,0.006360221,0.0036458015,0.0043764194,0.00036281138],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006745949,0.000061140876,0.016672872,0.00012955602,0.000016744438,0.0011700164,0.32820013,0.00015763425,0.00041349928,0.58722293,0.033229865,0.032658122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013642135,0.000031166313,0.08365065,0.00073888537,0.000034170826,0.00059931615,0.32240373,0.00020269568,0.00044452422,0.03691557,0.55485475,0.00011085336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94146514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98627174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05853486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051167376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023242872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37124705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506191565","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1163","title":"The Silence of Section 15: Searching for Equality at the Supreme Court of Canada in 2007","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Section (typography); High Court; Citizenship; Immigration; Sociology; Politics; Business","score_opus":0.07990553910565779,"score_gpt":0.3539335472085003,"score_spread":0.2740280081028425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1506191565","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0718987,0.01530367,0.0057428293,0.41477376,0.0072644646,0.00023113935,0.0006454254,0.00021121984,0.48392883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5312293,0.0052689896,0.0036135043,0.345246,0.0012061653,0.00013876145,0.00035699396,0.00017624245,0.11276405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9662647,0.002743939,0.00094395166,0.0029584405,0.016148347,0.0109405015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844881,0.0048483573,0.00055109,0.00041446314,0.0077425567,0.0019553048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015857069,0.00054947473,0.0010404974,0.0018936043,0.041014798,0.023813652,0.0052904654,0.022096992,0.0033141011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027878739,0.0012677907,0.0012677943,0.0025400827,0.01970188,0.0043490045,0.005156381,0.02532746,0.0004624667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021970753,0.000017023774,0.0011627601,0.00004122063,0.000024953742,0.0004666857,0.007335079,0.00034794174,0.0003224815,0.871676,0.110605665,0.007978195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054704546,0.000032955104,0.0046926667,0.0007043479,0.000115452785,0.00016109041,0.011833629,0.0010777144,0.0015716988,0.05309244,0.92635095,0.00031238646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97939175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9852024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8055866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19441341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34678417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9343663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508643074","doi":"","title":"Contradictions and Challenges in Canadian Family Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Family law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.047264677936559044,"score_gpt":0.29283451972028046,"score_spread":0.24556984178372143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508643074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20339517,0.013476777,0.0025470315,0.34659618,0.0008859937,0.00006961722,0.00027146333,0.000053213415,0.43270457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710235,0.0022754972,0.0010011338,0.011075325,0.00010825793,0.000038773887,0.000042578693,0.000039518654,0.014395398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818112,0.0056792907,0.00049432425,0.0015760633,0.004098936,0.006340122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788714,0.009319305,0.0007976406,0.00080278225,0.0064299977,0.0037787647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018930554,0.00039231993,0.00091563247,0.0061215186,0.0849945,0.026322039,0.004598519,0.0103816055,0.010405481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03942632,0.0009205486,0.00068739604,0.0107240025,0.07125359,0.00931262,0.009366405,0.011809336,0.00037971238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018183524,0.000016089687,0.0013800327,0.000033218737,0.0000071599584,0.00019744496,0.0778704,0.00024430355,0.000038621638,0.89345026,0.017454458,0.00928988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003692982,0.00001419379,0.00871406,0.00068499823,0.00003924668,0.00022204942,0.37428525,0.0010393128,0.00015348941,0.33578968,0.27883512,0.00018572892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9867893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99138135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22390716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22390716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25143325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9001577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508932541","doi":"10.21991/c96q2t","title":"BEYOND ANDREWS: SUBSTANTIVE EQUALITY AND POSITIVE OBLIGATIONS AFTER ELDRIDGE AND VRIEND","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Disadvantaged; Disadvantage; Duty; Law; Political science; High Court; Section (typography); Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.03609435680499443,"score_gpt":0.2900341658805447,"score_spread":0.25393980907555025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508932541","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0182842,0.042593252,0.006474776,0.62441,0.006360328,0.00009663895,0.00015494949,0.000042479896,0.30158338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5878807,0.010496894,0.004091533,0.20253198,0.0041193017,0.00039530173,0.00008480801,0.00016187907,0.19023769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874012,0.0050389874,0.00074582105,0.0016624641,0.0031116982,0.0020399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984925,0.010683461,0.00044382227,0.0011708157,0.0022004505,0.0005764469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0143169435,0.0007019225,0.0012172207,0.0012256696,0.016816681,0.013640421,0.0027989247,0.023579951,0.010987097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026139785,0.0008411679,0.00100757,0.002207228,0.042518683,0.040023327,0.011654285,0.032112174,0.0011714051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010500665,0.000012147598,0.00003058248,0.000017033894,0.0000022912157,0.000024377505,0.0027344155,0.000025431647,0.000033649718,0.9766183,0.018229092,0.0022623034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030503463,0.000012042357,0.0003304158,0.00019906582,0.0000117016,0.00003177908,0.004098226,0.00007318153,0.00024020283,0.8500745,0.14483875,0.00005953164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06836576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07965894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06836576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01662404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014144811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13593566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510059581","doi":"","title":"What's so special about marriage? The impact of Wilkinson v Kitzinger","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CentAUR (University of Reading)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Meaning (existential); Lesbian; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.025400520026517937,"score_gpt":0.27223277826268927,"score_spread":0.24683225823617133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510059581","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050665247,0.028727107,0.000071293296,0.94410205,0.010513727,0.000005654189,0.000015113798,0.0000065593995,0.011492015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11278299,0.050526395,0.000148466,0.8080738,0.02143815,0.000019308507,0.000020601072,0.000036871195,0.006953307],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99332607,0.0035889475,0.00039321097,0.00041464868,0.001345915,0.0009311298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832849,0.009372598,0.00092336745,0.0004861046,0.0020185257,0.003914645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0079324,0.00020982267,0.0006134014,0.0011084313,0.0073041087,0.0040507754,0.0013094036,0.008585514,0.0043103555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035821244,0.00042974047,0.00047761612,0.0010879278,0.010787626,0.0064338087,0.0038091217,0.015467278,0.0005005181],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008250375,0.00010060052,0.009614103,0.0005120437,0.000053353997,0.0044608554,0.020904744,0.00008449879,0.00024575437,0.047413632,0.813214,0.10331403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004023816,0.00008601767,0.013102602,0.0040658615,0.000057226072,0.008187443,0.0433467,0.00009066719,0.0002010293,0.019705284,0.91102314,0.00009386036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08875213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22058208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08875213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004780807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011006753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17647105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510850940","doi":"","title":"Discrimination and Dignity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Legislature; Element (criminal law); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.020657563930472498,"score_gpt":0.3029320942038183,"score_spread":0.28227453027334576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510850940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16545846,0.008336226,0.0144180795,0.041672677,0.0005325008,0.000078998884,0.00012488673,0.00003990611,0.76933825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810465,0.0011093416,0.0020171106,0.0046188375,0.00009818287,0.00006396349,0.00003910812,0.000009990718,0.010996947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950901,0.0013842109,0.00037377616,0.0008884158,0.0015301325,0.0007332978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99638736,0.001547144,0.0006219464,0.00052798353,0.0004306583,0.00048495404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054176576,0.0003433247,0.00067107956,0.001534823,0.0049207825,0.0067041335,0.0012281465,0.005185606,0.0033435582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01065024,0.0002087089,0.00039591113,0.0006254313,0.051739633,0.0048113666,0.010587773,0.0039487532,0.0004617027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008603348,0.000009085871,0.00075490976,0.00001960285,0.0000040575715,0.00012359724,0.0019174846,0.000056356443,0.00019447305,0.991268,0.0003932052,0.005250582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016155529,0.00006272942,0.0021642384,0.00025436206,0.0000088450215,0.00047574102,0.0021028754,0.00016323198,0.00042304845,0.9629082,0.03140005,0.00002053145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033516975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003533367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067041335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033320896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038457043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028651655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1511491272","doi":"10.18061/dsq.v32i1.3032","title":"Equality &amp; Disability – A Charter Analysis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disability Studies Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Flourishing; Norm (philosophy); Situated; Sociology; Race (biology); Institution; Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Gender studies; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.1009499404288589,"score_gpt":0.40938839830346946,"score_spread":0.30843845787461055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1511491272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038574323,0.0038857856,0.06422344,0.019631583,0.0006643442,0.00017790464,0.00036527275,0.00010442459,0.872373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9336879,0.0016654144,0.014936091,0.0010474168,0.0003860783,0.00014848603,0.00016761944,0.000050907027,0.047909994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994319,0.0022289713,0.00014323284,0.00046921085,0.0021474103,0.0006922276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965976,0.0014429158,0.0004122922,0.00032903324,0.00099489,0.0002233421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004525842,0.0002458929,0.00031823793,0.0040321313,0.006531129,0.00628136,0.0011352029,0.0011980365,0.008642159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0094306795,0.00012867503,0.00035319626,0.003916403,0.015666774,0.0059931814,0.0033784166,0.0025477912,0.000430313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016630295,0.0000032561777,0.00013619763,0.0000043450314,3.6408022e-7,0.000017376711,0.0012085051,0.00006732177,0.000008383721,0.99441564,0.0012989998,0.0028379813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070868646,0.000022454196,0.0031673454,0.00012371334,0.000007760096,0.0001511685,0.0069943755,0.0016166754,0.00026720247,0.6879687,0.2996463,0.000027223505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05685637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034938775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05685637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012030112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008113138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11305082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513173581","doi":"10.21991/c9dm31","title":"Insite: Site and Sight","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Jurisdiction; Sight; Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.027761494307644824,"score_gpt":0.29261908705758033,"score_spread":0.2648575927499355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513173581","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01517895,0.0007964475,0.00113153,0.03164476,0.00056492374,0.000027962964,0.00022693514,0.00009864172,0.95032984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42600107,0.0011030087,0.0010654036,0.026554065,0.0003459156,0.00006388195,0.00026724333,0.00026119733,0.5443382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980944,0.00020560266,0.00001718244,0.00019687529,0.0005270998,0.00095889805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990308,0.00017334022,0.00004085073,0.00009626293,0.00034389153,0.0003148028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091489643,0.0003959906,0.00035677754,0.00080627756,0.026233317,0.010960735,0.0017274043,0.0057129585,0.035748143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028127253,0.00032795523,0.00037894503,0.0009897335,0.0111928405,0.0039017512,0.0042931745,0.008938715,0.0031787388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029609335,0.000021458394,0.0014953655,0.000029660945,0.000004789193,0.0007932175,0.0073770103,0.00007932292,0.00018937266,0.8180362,0.1637595,0.008184473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012256358,0.0000088980105,0.0012048437,0.0001234606,0.0000102294825,0.00035433474,0.0218434,0.00015853142,0.00034784983,0.028593488,0.9473136,0.000029136412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81230116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93740106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81230116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017841635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0330612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37760842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516154490","doi":"10.21991/c9jw99","title":"Reference re Supreme Court Act, ss 5 and 6 — Expanding the Constitution of Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Remand (court procedure); Majority opinion; Economic Justice; Certiorari; Court of equity; Precedent; Concurring opinion","score_opus":0.0322041707836593,"score_gpt":0.2834642513646748,"score_spread":0.2512600805810155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516154490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0215546,0.0090614045,0.00175726,0.14287096,0.005326775,0.00058069243,0.011656675,0.0003679118,0.8068236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1980153,0.0047168634,0.005251729,0.1470979,0.0011622753,0.00045529378,0.0030619393,0.0002038889,0.6400348],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893217,0.0005065485,0.0002887555,0.0007030507,0.0055273487,0.0036526683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99338406,0.0009930783,0.00013581054,0.00032188246,0.0038316904,0.0013333613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004440757,0.00064237136,0.00063572236,0.0027996195,0.023536883,0.011527851,0.0033436203,0.0113077015,0.012555794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012112584,0.0009809415,0.0009764759,0.0029052373,0.004701571,0.0019802076,0.0025810306,0.010520435,0.001977455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047551894,0.00004782066,0.001841198,0.000058052923,0.000014243015,0.0002793012,0.002033873,0.0005164001,0.0006901853,0.3384575,0.64585096,0.010163015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033105604,0.000012032771,0.008539531,0.00017928291,0.00002561506,0.000034290664,0.0012150699,0.0002977488,0.00035594663,0.0075715203,0.9816487,0.00008721176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8833373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11666267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26781526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8464509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516890318","doi":"10.7202/1018395ar","title":"Hugo Cyr, Canadian Federalism and Treaty Powers: Organic Constitutionalism at Work, New York, PIE Peter Lang, 2009","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Constitutionalism; Treaty; Work (physics); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.035875792759122845,"score_gpt":0.26131932136063124,"score_spread":0.2254435286015084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516890318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021320123,0.36795607,0.002061579,0.2228838,0.0039057436,0.00007269869,0.0017757132,0.0001425755,0.3990698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18506426,0.28790584,0.005655878,0.0828093,0.0053812633,0.00028299383,0.0014183683,0.00044006598,0.43104216],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996951,0.00049601146,0.00011117918,0.00026814317,0.0015343284,0.00063942483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761367,0.0008664255,0.00018835696,0.00012534327,0.0009599543,0.0002462455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022577422,0.0010156953,0.0006061756,0.003077426,0.013342939,0.00855433,0.0022904626,0.0075859376,0.029235762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005890695,0.0007502607,0.0005842814,0.007985732,0.012366633,0.008778909,0.0022245466,0.006770633,0.0045894375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001896709,0.000013587835,0.00041951687,0.00011296378,0.00000711825,0.00008774978,0.0023026674,0.000106746214,0.00007719058,0.29184148,0.6893607,0.015651375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014211664,0.0000048928737,0.0041170516,0.00043684096,0.000012507876,0.000056582387,0.0022015867,0.000088628796,0.00012593316,0.05051032,0.9423833,0.00004820135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9169009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9712918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94851524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05148477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055423915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37354988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518059740","doi":"","title":"Equality as a Comparative Concept: Mirror, Mirror, on the Wall, What's the Fairest of Them All?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Inequality; Social equality; Political science; Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07385561267386537,"score_gpt":0.3527944241166467,"score_spread":0.2789388114427813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518059740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02794446,0.02689797,0.022374429,0.14887308,0.002076773,0.0000496942,0.00013252822,0.000056841174,0.7715942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94634056,0.0056569283,0.0069100126,0.013632917,0.0006972445,0.000074354226,0.00007681581,0.000054653676,0.026556458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914409,0.004452846,0.000156517,0.0007083075,0.0020049352,0.0012364741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725974,0.0013251359,0.00019132075,0.0003003177,0.00063434214,0.00028920188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077307853,0.0005154777,0.00062846346,0.0021781342,0.010348818,0.01351259,0.0016414571,0.003590616,0.0055010715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010179695,0.00025082254,0.00036513232,0.0026533005,0.056459203,0.020595916,0.0066754986,0.0051074983,0.000500443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034850827,0.0000017859063,0.00006661402,0.000010900137,0.0000012968272,0.000011581709,0.0024953568,0.000011738969,0.00002204193,0.9917088,0.002022824,0.003643626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009998642,0.000017088973,0.00079049054,0.00026901768,0.000013382264,0.00009513691,0.012498143,0.00016085549,0.00024995604,0.81781113,0.16806275,0.00002213296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.105408005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12708999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.105408005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018114133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013241806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20958894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518067101","doi":"10.7202/043765ar","title":"BJARNE MELKEVIK, Réflexions sur la philosophie du droit, Québec, Les Presses de l’Université Laval, 2000, 214 p., ISBN 2-7637-7735-X.","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.013985871885570583,"score_gpt":0.2334504493331741,"score_spread":0.21946457744760353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518067101","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005086859,0.9273186,0.00055034354,0.033084713,0.002262637,0.000017339622,0.0006656278,0.000084381456,0.035507616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025334246,0.72884905,0.0019315116,0.007899657,0.0014358471,0.00007319856,0.00084760244,0.00030989092,0.23331897],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851555,0.00025345682,0.00010101304,0.00017953798,0.0007635405,0.00018675851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978878,0.00079370633,0.00017829897,0.000064472224,0.0008551562,0.00022052434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019340097,0.0020080092,0.0011382288,0.0051090177,0.0056187203,0.0063453913,0.0023169464,0.004811755,0.05444741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003385805,0.0010321632,0.0004842745,0.009899891,0.003848455,0.0077112406,0.0013444019,0.0044460786,0.0163391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048050177,0.0000148699555,0.00030778415,0.0005479643,0.00001659813,0.00010338769,0.0024690796,0.0001624091,0.00016268659,0.015808936,0.9358018,0.044556394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010833655,0.000004726996,0.0029297064,0.00092382944,0.000009342536,0.00010469697,0.0016941542,0.00007630237,0.00013118135,0.0036266064,0.9904574,0.00003106164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85929173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92295206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85929173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03739366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023613153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28307378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518430871","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2360310","title":"Conceptual Metaphors for an Unfinished Constitution","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03321330002785273,"score_gpt":0.3176548386808913,"score_spread":0.28444153865303856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518430871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0633571,0.0013295719,0.14961855,0.066578545,0.0013475936,0.00019700734,0.00023461199,0.00018057112,0.71715635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9482797,0.000309582,0.022543255,0.00201397,0.0002802878,0.0003610338,0.00008278988,0.0001370335,0.025992507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99284303,0.005053303,0.00024081957,0.0005399401,0.0007709019,0.0005520959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951101,0.0025417444,0.00039664,0.00094947754,0.00061281194,0.00038918646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072178612,0.0006155646,0.00065695896,0.0028573151,0.007903828,0.009828023,0.0021220471,0.004670803,0.01216786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011026059,0.0005801022,0.0006501888,0.0023599346,0.046520203,0.01546131,0.0061281775,0.008717926,0.0012077689],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.0859945e-7,0.0000012138019,0.0000048832967,0.0000016202905,2.5196857e-7,0.0000062894837,0.001515948,0.0000114506,0.000010223854,0.99810374,0.00020001316,0.0001435465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001303531,0.000004230001,0.00002913603,0.000018015013,0.0000027453311,0.00005837699,0.0031664574,0.00033286787,0.00004253652,0.97542745,0.02089888,0.0000063302723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002366116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028135998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01216786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042266357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036345809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04070556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519493522","doi":"","title":"Justice Gonthier and Disability Rights: The Case of Nova Scotia (Workers' Compensation Board) v. Martin","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Appeal; Economic Justice; Compensation (psychology); Tribunal; Law; Workers' compensation; Disability studies; Political science; Legislation; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.024397563041967607,"score_gpt":0.3194481662665341,"score_spread":0.2950506032245665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519493522","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.531067,0.0069587952,0.0009936863,0.16530101,0.0010406367,0.00014605184,0.00013011828,0.000023244667,0.2943394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90240973,0.000958343,0.00031607095,0.049036495,0.00015820269,0.00005536504,0.000020639965,0.000011244831,0.047033794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961966,0.0006276922,0.00006104512,0.00026256795,0.0005708584,0.0022812507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971938,0.001319432,0.0002517018,0.00009426179,0.00034272307,0.00079805654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027879782,0.00029029476,0.00035208696,0.0007265869,0.02125079,0.00493896,0.001508621,0.00887346,0.002983351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006573569,0.00043613897,0.0004537301,0.0005842992,0.010225063,0.0013771298,0.0038153727,0.007199832,0.00026361758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022665744,0.00012620394,0.037373375,0.00017598698,0.00005489349,0.028329683,0.096149534,0.0012941164,0.0023766868,0.7244008,0.09262249,0.01686953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000333709,0.00024848056,0.136278,0.0018565115,0.00019869838,0.0070537906,0.10701203,0.0024166824,0.002419781,0.059576385,0.68213147,0.00047438635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8814545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93993694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11854547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025723606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026367625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23848718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521054892","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1177","title":"Resiling from Reconciling?: Musing on R. v. Kapp","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Charter; Disadvantaged; Context (archaeology); Political science; Section (typography); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; History","score_opus":0.07631733068617569,"score_gpt":0.3569624379205901,"score_spread":0.28064510723441444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521054892","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021258956,0.006361542,0.010090362,0.59441805,0.003097396,0.00011289669,0.000058103265,0.00021079683,0.3643919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5531037,0.004490189,0.0067980113,0.35463703,0.0019793324,0.00032402668,0.00005521728,0.00022501199,0.07838756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887453,0.005715047,0.00024348205,0.0012372269,0.0021432356,0.0019156935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951208,0.003265359,0.00016539577,0.00044294464,0.0005975629,0.00040798308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009804052,0.00054158637,0.00080304104,0.0012085785,0.014709051,0.010661093,0.0027612664,0.019252216,0.004133913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020184446,0.00054937444,0.0009280518,0.0006797493,0.02397676,0.010466621,0.012496983,0.022819228,0.0009045718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015552603,0.000008822715,0.00013940911,0.000021149399,0.0000051904367,0.00037155068,0.0031875495,0.0002168745,0.00009879018,0.9449525,0.043555684,0.007426961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034445162,0.00005864776,0.00040652463,0.00047021074,0.000020864727,0.00034686446,0.0071028355,0.0010024583,0.00044870735,0.6295925,0.36043444,0.000081628285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03720411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052304424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9627959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008333642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014377159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073975146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523660458","doi":"","title":"An Institutional Suicide Machine: Discrimination Against Federally Sentenced Aboriginal Women in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Criminology; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.022348626949717277,"score_gpt":0.2638741762029914,"score_spread":0.24152554925327413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523660458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92642266,0.0031767169,0.00017644337,0.037184734,0.00047162702,0.000106569976,0.00023357142,0.000018887657,0.032208703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97581494,0.0024254164,0.00022802208,0.009202266,0.000046488454,0.00002427948,0.00010625777,0.000014852199,0.012137369],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729365,0.00031137184,0.000053347074,0.00016018284,0.0005805664,0.0016009145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967803,0.0002876944,0.00029690407,0.000076619166,0.00089403254,0.0016643616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013276013,0.0003270569,0.00043760048,0.0013205406,0.0408661,0.0043649347,0.0026455252,0.0025857314,0.0038110237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035683434,0.00038332798,0.00037559593,0.002194171,0.008475208,0.0011622477,0.0046222243,0.00521619,0.0002674173],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085295396,0.00017417791,0.10133889,0.00023729188,0.000038448434,0.004151457,0.7872303,0.00012745937,0.00082838914,0.0148210125,0.040847607,0.050119605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008255275,0.000066386005,0.07719885,0.00042558048,0.00002974486,0.0006430852,0.8661119,0.00011951052,0.0002192524,0.0006910205,0.054417405,0.00006900466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9941439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99840987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07773801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07773801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19003753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56403136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524847764","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1057","title":"Enforcing a Parent/Child Relationship at All Cost?: Supervised Access Orders in the Canadian Courts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Attorney-General's Department, Australian Government; Griffith University; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Focus (optics); Key (lock); Component (thermodynamics); Focus group; Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Computer security","score_opus":0.16740974870066885,"score_gpt":0.34736195174549017,"score_spread":0.17995220304482132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524847764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91787344,0.00085531664,0.00070310815,0.013793175,0.00006280794,0.00009263577,0.00016596494,0.00002087132,0.06643253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934006,0.00041619322,0.00036735265,0.0007360385,0.000007900386,0.0000124816825,0.000026995192,0.000008297634,0.0050242483],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99300295,0.0012040575,0.00021574143,0.00053361774,0.0028149772,0.002228582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875122,0.004156231,0.0012327353,0.00046349198,0.004099081,0.002536303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046303556,0.00023149475,0.00034088272,0.0015110839,0.034831397,0.006721528,0.0020790743,0.002237737,0.0019712567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021167412,0.00051827804,0.00022587372,0.003072697,0.011228445,0.0023945223,0.0033640552,0.0040391823,0.0001207835],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006504441,0.00007599395,0.044823393,0.000082238745,0.00002472443,0.0040353425,0.814561,0.0006087005,0.0011783516,0.0881004,0.014716198,0.0317286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016058855,0.00003382755,0.118991226,0.00021896779,0.000041444444,0.00080731517,0.7401044,0.0009785978,0.0009836946,0.00391859,0.13373944,0.00016646217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99482536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16593339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16593339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16250436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96739906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526634404","doi":"","title":"The Difference of Queer","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Queer; Institution; Legislation; Sociology; Politics; Gender studies; Human sexuality; Democracy; Mainstream; Law; Sexual orientation; Political science","score_opus":0.031103220381397068,"score_gpt":0.29578999709182574,"score_spread":0.2646867767104287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526634404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04579552,0.0066817678,0.0008460839,0.14373763,0.0018612365,0.000030289795,0.0002846322,0.00004714491,0.8007157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.687768,0.0032145206,0.0005539149,0.03039343,0.00036611734,0.000035841284,0.0001532198,0.00006611121,0.2774489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954333,0.0011933828,0.00006741921,0.00055277586,0.0012255806,0.0015275889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99630004,0.0007291147,0.00019012367,0.00034152946,0.0010692739,0.0013699665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027402928,0.00023492944,0.0003307075,0.00096307934,0.02560811,0.0069966456,0.0006783388,0.0017687465,0.016538333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077150655,0.00012971676,0.00021499308,0.0010403339,0.022382794,0.003670789,0.0035317927,0.004917972,0.0011013157],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029295075,0.000017146402,0.0022692329,0.000019550454,0.000004578812,0.00008285107,0.04226669,0.000023368904,0.00014503642,0.85264325,0.080103435,0.022395452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008260879,0.000022123986,0.005505332,0.00011148052,0.000009535465,0.00012790597,0.03821844,0.000051835643,0.00016871597,0.035844613,0.9199027,0.000029081542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78903055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8587609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78903055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027029097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03325154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42442375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527705800","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511635489.019","title":"Induction of labour","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Hospital Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Business; Mathematics","score_opus":0.037538364851698966,"score_gpt":0.24583091454762693,"score_spread":0.20829254969592798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527705800","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037188397,0.0062766676,0.054303497,0.0056352927,0.0026701593,0.0008584474,0.0023801264,0.0012111616,0.9229458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034097515,0.006475416,0.025671888,0.0029700638,0.0004469522,0.0012358696,0.0023371489,0.00054276997,0.9262224],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888045,0.00016840623,0.000053428485,0.00021963267,0.00042291157,0.00025512994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991172,0.00022094304,0.00006305091,0.00023659463,0.0001973731,0.00016485683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014427518,0.00061200286,0.0007726648,0.0013134856,0.0015683441,0.0014878794,0.002106962,0.0010145695,0.14704289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026385176,0.0003162873,0.0011792476,0.0009387652,0.0018225785,0.0010471187,0.0035429748,0.0031334518,0.12573649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042466866,0.00020989419,0.0004947186,0.0012392708,0.000013317959,0.0008425968,0.0010537936,0.00035716567,0.018640189,0.279969,0.31482586,0.38192952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022856602,0.00009407328,0.0008614142,0.000261557,0.0000046846735,0.00043168457,0.0001266242,0.00009935001,0.0046470365,0.018832047,0.97460485,0.000013899954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011827118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018035603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14704289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015759276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027045812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49190748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529214970","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664313.003.0002","title":"Dignity, Equality, and Comparison","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Plaintiff; Comparability; Interpretation (philosophy); Law and economics; Redress; Political science; Prima facie; Law; Relevance (law); Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06854093191385721,"score_gpt":0.30053529679993846,"score_spread":0.23199436488608124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529214970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030995749,0.007967116,0.018794838,0.026966317,0.000403093,0.0001149876,0.0000906587,0.0000341773,0.9146331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9289113,0.003904426,0.01175141,0.005981148,0.00016647353,0.00015844195,0.00008594047,0.0000336776,0.049007308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866384,0.0046160915,0.0004759578,0.0012168603,0.005213712,0.0018389311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965365,0.0016305565,0.00026513266,0.00042474765,0.0007576641,0.0003854271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010600268,0.00050051213,0.00081607566,0.0030523136,0.011559348,0.010221093,0.002141922,0.0031819178,0.0051291618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012553375,0.00028584668,0.00038062857,0.0024409043,0.09020892,0.00863623,0.012114467,0.0034708306,0.00042831295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029317284,0.0000026561997,0.00017830076,0.00001478641,0.0000016000573,0.000042686002,0.0028232285,0.00002695232,0.000042604745,0.99124134,0.00044654607,0.005176477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010517751,0.000024718403,0.0014043476,0.0002958139,0.000009498073,0.00021333636,0.006438641,0.000118398864,0.0002796098,0.8741184,0.11706573,0.00002111168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15081832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19604681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15081832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019327372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019648751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29988092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529947265","doi":"","title":"Le contrat de mariage en droit québécois : un destin marqué du sceau du paradoxe","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.004486056585086852,"score_gpt":0.1682365149952254,"score_spread":0.16375045841013855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529947265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21507691,0.009909957,0.004182215,0.25314692,0.000703452,0.000062116276,0.00046465592,0.000055552053,0.5163982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9189988,0.00258355,0.00081622653,0.017497303,0.00012975045,0.000047573372,0.00006438802,0.00003580972,0.05982662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972324,0.0006388506,0.000048091373,0.00040923944,0.00068592187,0.000985515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971867,0.001061698,0.00027656337,0.00021870265,0.0008723404,0.00038398744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032751067,0.00039615313,0.00076063874,0.0014350243,0.015887907,0.0070388764,0.0019325976,0.00506423,0.011940287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054311506,0.0003134401,0.0004802201,0.0016706232,0.017382326,0.003230821,0.002864601,0.005438953,0.00042918432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002397461,0.0000110896435,0.0018007009,0.0000630365,0.000019338211,0.0002961278,0.009022961,0.00041405394,0.00014633576,0.963788,0.017123584,0.007290777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010965862,0.00003900665,0.02197542,0.0010156356,0.00010313181,0.00032566822,0.044635557,0.002534304,0.000749954,0.3925139,0.5358503,0.0001473711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9293624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9467772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070637584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061924458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047708023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44929546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530058139","doi":"","title":"The Embarrassing Preamble? Understanding the 'Supremacy of God' and the Charter","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Charter; Preamble; Dignity; Fundamental rights; Original meaning; Bill of rights; Human rights; Originalism; Constitution; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03997345199637234,"score_gpt":0.2994070011599536,"score_spread":0.2594335491635813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530058139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13241728,0.026467197,0.013357938,0.25918007,0.0015517334,0.000052975043,0.00022483271,0.00008741266,0.5666605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97004884,0.0036715877,0.001746509,0.0065732743,0.0002587798,0.000016528133,0.00005305056,0.000031786883,0.01759962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980428,0.0006051013,0.00002994179,0.00019444896,0.00044770393,0.000679881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983752,0.00056129304,0.00019937882,0.000139099,0.00043281945,0.00029214728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030254233,0.00033927916,0.0003992024,0.0011019848,0.009253759,0.010602918,0.0014437153,0.0023987624,0.0040783277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049892906,0.00019972646,0.0002266225,0.001427076,0.049003746,0.008951455,0.0021771519,0.0042133667,0.0003863259],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060422713,0.0000044454914,0.00023267968,0.000017061118,9.455408e-7,0.000029580435,0.011332584,0.000055941306,0.00007518528,0.97740984,0.004686346,0.0061493022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015550995,0.000026736487,0.005157566,0.00039294185,0.000015155133,0.00011035981,0.050554343,0.00054571225,0.00057288905,0.5865719,0.35597727,0.000059583846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7295879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7442122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2704121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026257973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03855708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5440092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533620438","doi":"","title":"Circumscribed Spheres of Belonging and Action: Framing Indigenous Self-Determination in Terms of 'Non-Domination'","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Constitutionalism; Democracy; Framing (construction); Politics; State (computer science); Sociology; Political science; Colonialism; Indigenous rights; Law and economics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.018301824979090563,"score_gpt":0.29195696539954374,"score_spread":0.2736551404204532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533620438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19863684,0.005312523,0.034602877,0.0279039,0.00035633682,0.0001242245,0.000032244214,0.00005864516,0.7329724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902954,0.00054092036,0.0015987311,0.00034880554,0.00004372678,0.000041711457,0.000007885415,0.000015989886,0.007106966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99367934,0.0038260382,0.00010479081,0.00060211174,0.00070098933,0.0010866659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788946,0.00093276886,0.000172529,0.00023862354,0.0002580564,0.00050866994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054437835,0.00050654466,0.00056004926,0.0014756437,0.016608771,0.009592309,0.0016434978,0.0022447694,0.0022212826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035241537,0.00023017246,0.00044119614,0.0010324956,0.13999546,0.0070044687,0.009076953,0.0040435237,0.00013289954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045172233,0.0000063529546,0.00026303242,0.000017730128,0.000001833193,0.00006425975,0.09333143,0.00013164476,0.000089174486,0.9032597,0.00021225619,0.0026180127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012991339,0.0000313819,0.0022604174,0.0002046197,0.000014127056,0.000118360884,0.11304587,0.00086101703,0.00027279934,0.78251487,0.10062674,0.000036891535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1728416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1841242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1728416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026010258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019720424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34367114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533865971","doi":"","title":"Feminist Activism in the Supreme Court: Legal Mobilization and the Women's Legal Education and Action Fund (review)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Supreme court; Humanities; Ethnology; Law; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.032429925361732975,"score_gpt":0.29347486159463915,"score_spread":0.26104493623290614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533865971","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014511321,0.9830331,0.000030089343,0.013517749,0.00090999133,0.000004748659,0.000008783378,0.0000016316294,0.0023487536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0044952855,0.9785413,0.00007159009,0.012137311,0.0019795327,0.000022533397,0.000021350761,0.0000047582366,0.0027262815],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709225,0.0010904315,0.00015933972,0.00018435637,0.0011694728,0.00030411605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942036,0.0035503025,0.0005756448,0.00007093085,0.0013188835,0.00028061913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035181118,0.0004341086,0.0008691769,0.0026706504,0.001622295,0.0050762305,0.001279216,0.003864647,0.0036094545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007828731,0.0003079209,0.0005972579,0.005433657,0.004528329,0.0037825059,0.0013176749,0.0032778522,0.0006449878],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048151527,0.00003028113,0.0009858273,0.011878817,0.00010855078,0.00023574212,0.0016842854,0.00026687107,0.00019671948,0.053774655,0.5749749,0.35581508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001727679,0.000024352654,0.003480161,0.019912409,0.000053655072,0.00014474717,0.0010180128,0.00004810839,0.000060068596,0.0043023364,0.97091967,0.000019273964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074627444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23811136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074627444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009207768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02418669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14838618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535711523","doi":"10.3917/nqf.282.0024","title":"Liberté contractuelle et relations conjugales : font-elles bon ménage ?","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Nouvelles Questions Féministes","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023965851056064295,"score_gpt":0.31531899912207595,"score_spread":0.29135314806601165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535711523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24998459,0.023070393,0.0028442377,0.11595089,0.0005745551,0.000050090675,0.00015237907,0.00002396259,0.60734886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9521109,0.0038981163,0.0003348393,0.0032041431,0.00015583113,0.000022826305,0.000034498295,0.000014665815,0.040224195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967444,0.0012277345,0.00005168102,0.00029398798,0.00062427117,0.0010578374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797267,0.0005722924,0.0002841227,0.00021225671,0.00031840662,0.00064032804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033673486,0.00026492323,0.00045100247,0.00087157456,0.013365048,0.010035755,0.0011407982,0.0019205677,0.013478823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004978385,0.00018090144,0.00025468398,0.0015527294,0.035872318,0.0059852013,0.004917956,0.0032591498,0.000639657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002456942,0.000025415615,0.004155894,0.000036869,0.000006773682,0.00027182425,0.091766514,0.000043286513,0.000088362525,0.88342154,0.0036094033,0.016549546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024086748,0.000037684535,0.03261657,0.0007279352,0.000015587982,0.00047718905,0.29683194,0.00019267773,0.00032381227,0.13031253,0.5383872,0.00005279415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5020109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5705828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5020109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021570459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019266745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537485993","doi":"10.21153/dlr2006vol11no1art230","title":"The Stolen Generations - Canada and Australia: the Legacy of Assimilation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Law; Project commissioning; Duty of care; Liability; Jurisprudence; Damages; Publishing; Political science; Government (linguistics); Duty; Fiduciary; Tort; Sociology","score_opus":0.04886536736657516,"score_gpt":0.33575195807044494,"score_spread":0.2868865907038698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537485993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49901953,0.042072527,0.00077744835,0.083516575,0.00080516847,0.00007248437,0.00013877072,0.000026600006,0.3735709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9558672,0.013856291,0.00032559008,0.0055430075,0.00008409279,0.000014106476,0.000023016937,0.00001612638,0.024270609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948026,0.0006280366,0.00010157745,0.00041943885,0.002265312,0.0017830076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99653,0.00073684583,0.00029545554,0.00016271742,0.0012922123,0.000982812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025241107,0.0002548426,0.00043186985,0.0018735809,0.03182108,0.009265085,0.0014194734,0.0028539316,0.0038406113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005731904,0.00026925933,0.00030343764,0.0026480842,0.017725386,0.0025999288,0.0060614506,0.0050065247,0.00012991445],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005424971,0.00006593956,0.013847907,0.00026642348,0.0000390317,0.0032072007,0.19183645,0.00040637978,0.0005375031,0.6609521,0.02217964,0.10660713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015091813,0.00006980886,0.08045242,0.0010219475,0.00008170415,0.0014200464,0.19907413,0.000517563,0.00057854905,0.031959992,0.6846329,0.00017579779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9763723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9869186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08322399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08322399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12185113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6038351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537810167","doi":"","title":"The myth and the meaning of science as a vocation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Theology","score_opus":0.016788846927294772,"score_gpt":0.2630401191761365,"score_spread":0.24625127224884175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537810167","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020203048,0.07630203,0.02519917,0.4544656,0.015221317,0.00007679077,0.00022028125,0.00015343756,0.40815836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80805147,0.03605166,0.012310963,0.07620098,0.02209374,0.0004774453,0.0002142104,0.00031206827,0.044287525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885218,0.0072252643,0.0003202859,0.0014056326,0.0018497108,0.0006772413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891031,0.0074118935,0.00067618256,0.0012774322,0.00081491575,0.0007164812],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011290677,0.0007667391,0.0010110995,0.0025952046,0.008621292,0.01657299,0.002375921,0.005955759,0.003796612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012147839,0.00046049175,0.0007727864,0.0021855377,0.13682964,0.023007346,0.0073786173,0.014778498,0.0011989886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009765074,0.0000067286833,0.00009189528,0.000049432394,0.0000038372978,0.0000262808,0.008576896,0.0000547984,0.000055863424,0.98236096,0.0063150697,0.0024486135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012142741,0.00001633341,0.00017566586,0.00023710991,0.0000035613866,0.00009360594,0.0044381456,0.00012923201,0.000063642714,0.8263864,0.16843061,0.000013500191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023212535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017797997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9913787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057660444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061490126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059711576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537841610","doi":"","title":"Sexual Assault in Canada: Law, Legal Practice and Women's Activism ed. by Elizabeth Sheehy (review)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Criminology; Political science; Law; Sociology; Sexual violence; Medicine; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.01926015339986512,"score_gpt":0.28107275979151164,"score_spread":0.2618126063916465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537841610","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000051379946,0.99414366,0.0000053063345,0.0049241185,0.000528567,0.0000029415773,0.000019234963,0.000001195831,0.000323572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00084540877,0.99672,0.000016659924,0.0015874212,0.0004701723,0.0000055859828,0.000023808252,0.0000012312577,0.0003296931],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978484,0.0003953893,0.00018893334,0.00013464036,0.0011461048,0.00028658015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915035,0.0025894688,0.00077737455,0.00007560171,0.0039992523,0.0010548253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030710818,0.001179498,0.0024356248,0.005565835,0.0027003917,0.0060250866,0.0018879405,0.003304977,0.005597707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010262891,0.0007561435,0.0008801395,0.012021166,0.0038238696,0.002571614,0.0021486026,0.0034839937,0.0009338039],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008775657,0.000042355845,0.0019029926,0.022924023,0.00021553875,0.00016977388,0.0009294545,0.000250366,0.00008067554,0.003948225,0.5587881,0.4106607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058654685,0.00006447808,0.022432722,0.08881461,0.00041936047,0.0006804867,0.002705433,0.00014277679,0.0000787386,0.0014758039,0.8830206,0.00010640883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8351982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93348634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16480178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026968898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11505642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33154464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540370978","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139021555","title":"The Cambridge Introduction to the Eighteenth-Century Novel","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Solitude; Cosmopolitanism; Identity (music); History; Variety (cybernetics); Independence (probability theory); Secrecy; Literature; History of literature; Period (music); Aesthetics; Art; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02527524517670609,"score_gpt":0.23770837941237524,"score_spread":0.21243313423566915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1540370978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027214685,0.10976449,0.00072816794,0.015442529,0.011457312,0.00006291142,0.00027270123,0.000082607854,0.8594678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0511673,0.07016242,0.0010630558,0.0048958124,0.00589337,0.00018889265,0.0003157532,0.00018161279,0.86613184],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993337,0.00020165578,0.000034977013,0.00008731117,0.00025225637,0.00009014219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994491,0.00019687814,0.000042937576,0.00004194637,0.00015969654,0.00010954399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006221665,0.00069444085,0.00037407508,0.0017084326,0.004221058,0.005541528,0.00081694004,0.0012027405,0.039768465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014925984,0.0003045224,0.00024400612,0.0014648318,0.0045322743,0.002675084,0.002092711,0.002523003,0.0076151974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044491233,0.000053104803,0.00015524228,0.0004642703,0.0000059350223,0.0004329027,0.013597274,0.0001197884,0.0003749753,0.2931753,0.6446085,0.046968285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017110681,0.0000044780186,0.00011561878,0.00015896157,4.914205e-7,0.00006184303,0.00047879366,0.0000051329766,0.000025798994,0.0020954541,0.99704903,0.0000026489743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011561097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019001741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039768465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073533403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003009502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13303876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541632163","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1244","title":"Reflecting Culture: Polygamy and the Charter","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Charter; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Fundamental rights; Constitutionality; Dignity; Human rights; Multiculturalism","score_opus":0.07417976940743624,"score_gpt":0.3801526344062625,"score_spread":0.30597286499882625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541632163","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15034702,0.07846236,0.00422407,0.20521419,0.001601644,0.000054247907,0.000117646436,0.00002483932,0.559954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9582762,0.018435732,0.0005995732,0.009814725,0.0002855337,0.000020296486,0.000022776945,0.000012972195,0.012532119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99341774,0.0038931998,0.000104163286,0.00030250073,0.0016475276,0.00063483446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952911,0.0027081545,0.00044909542,0.00023784951,0.0009935364,0.0003202639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005814452,0.00017379933,0.0002445854,0.0013705806,0.006816901,0.008434893,0.0009022725,0.0016697851,0.0020833039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00872157,0.0001427639,0.00011555933,0.0021372663,0.024144977,0.004758564,0.002769505,0.0035426987,0.00014299522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066886155,0.000011584986,0.0010199451,0.00005745892,0.000004599697,0.000110848174,0.02792761,0.00009981555,0.0000622461,0.93226105,0.012016809,0.02642151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002265812,0.00007087544,0.015414165,0.0009721494,0.000029554296,0.00033023144,0.08888989,0.0003995485,0.000445848,0.28458878,0.60876167,0.000074653486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34876904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42743716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34876904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01110681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015309007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.693478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543323977","doi":"","title":"Is Constitutionalism Bad for Intersectional Feminists","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Constitutionalism; Charter; Sociology; Gender studies; Faith; Political science; Multiculturalism; Jurisprudence; Family law; Law; Democracy; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019816091922466705,"score_gpt":0.3295474116038052,"score_spread":0.3097313196813385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543323977","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014005271,0.013064018,0.0050632795,0.8184765,0.0021586623,0.000020316616,0.000051766336,0.000074625816,0.14708553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84950894,0.007802708,0.0038318015,0.11191385,0.0052383933,0.00015271846,0.000070295835,0.00025255594,0.021228725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9565424,0.02787112,0.0008107662,0.005033216,0.0057454663,0.003997048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96428585,0.025239354,0.0020947985,0.0035247856,0.0027292313,0.002126101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039975807,0.00056082377,0.0011719011,0.0020412402,0.019114401,0.023260687,0.0033001564,0.0124663375,0.006809976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036053315,0.00071913813,0.00093623594,0.0017112283,0.13279058,0.030167703,0.013131951,0.018719135,0.0013644483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059448785,0.00000926018,0.00015087967,0.00002468995,0.0000031575933,0.000024307841,0.006476348,0.000037031183,0.000026309224,0.984312,0.0058918265,0.003038315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023272834,0.000015313875,0.0002379911,0.00022521825,0.000007282465,0.00009138984,0.01622327,0.00014551323,0.00018159067,0.71384275,0.26897988,0.000026561132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011194002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010266368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039975807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012149824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011295618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21141481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543630193","doi":"","title":"Reinvigorating Section 27: An Intersectional Approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Charter; Multiculturalism; Political science; Intersectionality; Minority rights; Law; Faith; Sociology; Gender studies; Law and economics; Human rights; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02120108562940158,"score_gpt":0.30130528726469447,"score_spread":0.28010420163529287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543630193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014614105,0.0016180249,0.08996493,0.021158507,0.0009707774,0.00020472787,0.00013803536,0.00012390497,0.87120706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7827395,0.0024881065,0.04794945,0.013013759,0.0006836142,0.00049616746,0.00022838889,0.00045987984,0.1519411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98421174,0.005096417,0.00059021247,0.0016877012,0.0055864635,0.0028276038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99226004,0.002596959,0.0004488324,0.0010015545,0.0032296663,0.0004629399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014082537,0.00052274426,0.0006301846,0.002864797,0.013598938,0.013206997,0.0040934687,0.0042314245,0.006680727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014028331,0.00068288477,0.0011099977,0.002879376,0.039480675,0.009507153,0.009810433,0.009749795,0.0011940241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024210758,0.0000023141804,0.000096125565,0.0000068417385,0.0000012332424,0.000034550034,0.0036765258,0.00008101449,0.000042550753,0.99247426,0.0014290025,0.0021530364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008923584,0.00003031865,0.0009410202,0.00041227127,0.000029024934,0.00014678665,0.012049551,0.00094112474,0.00095225347,0.47960237,0.5048006,0.000085720385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3824987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39892647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3824987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04135515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06448765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76054466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543705524","doi":"","title":"Les conjoints de fait au Québec : protection juridique ou paternalisme","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Civil code; Injustice; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05639658886128584,"score_gpt":0.26434201969250437,"score_spread":0.20794543083121853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543705524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057223473,0.067833066,0.003571425,0.20235775,0.003773778,0.00011290953,0.000482639,0.00008829226,0.6645566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5717646,0.014160342,0.0014068973,0.026119197,0.00066499825,0.000058731574,0.00019046135,0.000061568186,0.38557312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979538,0.0003548944,0.000059006696,0.00017924319,0.0007320626,0.0007209392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980788,0.00042687863,0.00013381903,0.00009687465,0.00088990404,0.0003737343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013236854,0.00025631735,0.00021626838,0.00057260686,0.010501174,0.004072692,0.0010943845,0.0029951518,0.012256171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035953925,0.00024258276,0.00019104582,0.0010120262,0.008636806,0.0016959332,0.0012547319,0.00356971,0.000647713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009909421,0.000037291327,0.011228508,0.00021618122,0.00002554299,0.00092596246,0.05056628,0.00038933498,0.00087229157,0.55246425,0.2843451,0.09883018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001580232,0.000021085749,0.022749126,0.00046787006,0.000013933521,0.00030822627,0.012391461,0.00020658746,0.00024160284,0.010445055,0.95309204,0.000047170935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96563697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9868788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03436303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028600989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057554312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20751566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543804789","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Law of Spousal Support","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Family law; Certainty; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Child support; Geography","score_opus":0.012546939929437331,"score_gpt":0.2826351126852343,"score_spread":0.27008817275579694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543804789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020370355,0.012800865,0.003074,0.13914597,0.0014415979,0.00013275683,0.0011576734,0.00011537976,0.8217614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.715128,0.014119847,0.0052978927,0.048101384,0.00075538864,0.00025621243,0.00059240265,0.00010332724,0.21564564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900321,0.0008555042,0.00026702453,0.0006851877,0.0057964395,0.0023636867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928686,0.0009465045,0.00029521057,0.00032394598,0.0044932663,0.0010724509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003921231,0.0004132757,0.0003700991,0.0023856473,0.018871082,0.0064506535,0.0020452822,0.0039407643,0.008277393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01457981,0.00042401,0.00035744192,0.0034520058,0.013279035,0.0018301185,0.003102026,0.0043092095,0.00066533603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000095066725,0.000007492635,0.0015720314,0.000056181747,0.0000053484314,0.000118915894,0.0053283023,0.00018441043,0.00010290429,0.88418686,0.087548226,0.020879826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015862197,0.000009906241,0.0060724393,0.00035906714,0.000017506001,0.00010501288,0.002738525,0.00022621863,0.000102299295,0.028571794,0.9617246,0.000056759764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9906866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09615517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09615517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22327021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6976578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545562636","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1224","title":"To What End the Dialogue?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Mainstream; Restructuring; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Duty; Law; Transparency (behavior); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.10160000435219092,"score_gpt":0.3372321385744745,"score_spread":0.23563213422228357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545562636","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005910278,0.015592319,0.011396879,0.6552047,0.004343957,0.000098716555,0.00011222937,0.00009793777,0.307243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63759595,0.012878636,0.010405717,0.20286274,0.0031522221,0.00036642395,0.00020428884,0.00028201,0.132252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9757194,0.01545218,0.00057087064,0.0019147822,0.00311221,0.0032305804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98853475,0.004645043,0.0007144263,0.000645633,0.0030360555,0.002423971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015418391,0.0005252015,0.0007198389,0.0014220645,0.016044535,0.021089172,0.002730367,0.010712848,0.0100501105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025927186,0.00031782012,0.0005287381,0.0012168278,0.027062826,0.017797504,0.007307408,0.013666242,0.0042011305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013565437,0.000023103616,0.0003615175,0.00011721074,0.000008857683,0.00022912644,0.042304963,0.00004606751,0.0001498092,0.8766608,0.060869724,0.019215265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011959891,0.00001606539,0.00036580468,0.00057833677,0.000009426576,0.00017952512,0.060289,0.000115625604,0.00018765454,0.29814267,0.6400818,0.000022074499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05040322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04974107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05040322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016045416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030806884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11641818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546479244","doi":"","title":"Jürgen Römer: The Toronto Blessing. Åbo Akademi 2002","year":2003,"lang":"sv","type":"article","venue":"Kyrkohistorisk årsskrift","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blessing; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02811942298398611,"score_gpt":0.30039956287016467,"score_spread":0.27228013988617855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546479244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002146232,0.17724276,0.0009052703,0.05538907,0.009844011,0.000051003128,0.005932671,0.00094042503,0.74754864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00686459,0.021650096,0.00035217713,0.00065538526,0.0004816079,0.000016457898,0.000829889,0.00027822782,0.96887165],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953234,0.0000634867,0.000029047958,0.00009204206,0.00020709938,0.00007592952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944943,0.00005354648,0.000045852124,0.000079136415,0.00020415885,0.00016777562],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005192304,0.00094394834,0.0006093508,0.0018035743,0.0042563593,0.004397047,0.0008972992,0.0019446106,0.39297265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010004235,0.0005470977,0.00025811465,0.0028622185,0.0015433596,0.0030977097,0.0022948845,0.002262203,0.13859628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037906873,0.0000073903784,0.0001656903,0.00013264948,0.0000041241788,0.00010602056,0.0005122323,0.000054988584,0.00013050393,0.013837808,0.9177102,0.06730052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001181659,0.0000013905085,0.00038570559,0.00006755303,9.001485e-7,0.000026060314,0.00018681187,0.0000074455565,0.000034511202,0.0003980619,0.9988875,0.0000029298205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.120867476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31646666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39297265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054225647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004575738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8658508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547604290","doi":"","title":"Equality Deferred: The Origins of the Newfoundland Human Rights State","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Érudit (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Ideal (ethics); State (computer science); Inequality; Political science; Government (linguistics); International human rights law; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.021829901379813783,"score_gpt":0.24606037821656612,"score_spread":0.22423047683675235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1547604290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4077495,0.004004274,0.0009128842,0.033842433,0.00019277753,0.000038826784,0.00028361764,0.000024671379,0.552951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.959487,0.0007103457,0.00024837969,0.0010934208,0.000016000706,0.000015593021,0.000036773927,0.000011952096,0.03838051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969914,0.00041645346,0.0000548956,0.0003821909,0.00032674184,0.001828363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969523,0.000930764,0.000337843,0.00028126963,0.00070123543,0.00079658144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020167555,0.00017891773,0.00037214512,0.00128828,0.019779075,0.0076109744,0.0012168306,0.0013795951,0.008930954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049860487,0.00030869307,0.00018260776,0.001586419,0.01952341,0.0032934083,0.0050278367,0.0038813374,0.00028104306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007463032,0.00004964638,0.019347506,0.00006508497,0.000021058962,0.0011675811,0.1527219,0.0004163591,0.00028699424,0.7629297,0.014833239,0.04808636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003398954,0.00004135373,0.13037184,0.0009856689,0.000058110578,0.00052880956,0.2066979,0.0007979731,0.00065112335,0.052985936,0.6066913,0.00015611736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98028195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99319214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09813763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09813763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06169815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7120417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550137324","doi":"","title":"Trans-Phobia and the Relational Production of Gender","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings women's law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Social psychology; Psychology; Identity (music); Privilege (computing); Normative; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03466680934819322,"score_gpt":0.2849187069758384,"score_spread":0.25025189762764516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550137324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63039315,0.0015231745,0.0070500523,0.010601807,0.000148392,0.000030345313,0.000029059356,0.000057903915,0.35016614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966698,0.00018898176,0.00029736987,0.00036986332,0.000017269826,0.000008597219,0.000004689769,0.0000073852025,0.002436178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982097,0.0011201795,0.00003316159,0.00013311204,0.0002758372,0.00022798701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981762,0.00087750866,0.0003984727,0.00016562473,0.00013231479,0.00024985845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017075414,0.00027554194,0.00017348888,0.000985076,0.002660432,0.0043952693,0.00042044633,0.0009238279,0.0049121464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005077589,0.00016512007,0.00018314781,0.00043737338,0.02301463,0.0025498085,0.00377188,0.0017165182,0.00021361526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054871005,0.00009274086,0.0098536555,0.0000830095,0.000011227399,0.0020744966,0.30769092,0.00010877678,0.0026768327,0.6484429,0.0015427659,0.027367743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005255911,0.00022200374,0.03133967,0.00041376578,0.000036305457,0.009614317,0.40282163,0.0010299189,0.0022266817,0.46380606,0.08836883,0.00006825065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027488898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002131867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049121464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022772038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015411518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016522408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551668827","doi":"10.21991/c9kd4w","title":"The Notwithstanding Clause, the Charter, and Canada's Patriated Constitution: What I Thought We Were Doing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"CARE Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Establishment Clause; Bill of rights; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; First amendment; Philosophy; Linguistics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.02493831321886555,"score_gpt":0.2755818411728401,"score_spread":0.2506435279539746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551668827","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026421677,0.049741082,0.0070910933,0.71379,0.0035612127,0.000071845025,0.00025706863,0.000084200656,0.19898175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73160374,0.030451188,0.006993945,0.16064744,0.0016384784,0.00010235969,0.00020615067,0.00017416505,0.068182506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99339676,0.0012937856,0.00013124295,0.0007800807,0.0024059636,0.0019921456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99299824,0.0033566735,0.0003221136,0.00025423683,0.002185219,0.0008835855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008698131,0.00046161198,0.000703623,0.0023919449,0.020785935,0.02003801,0.0023745403,0.010263089,0.003223497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01400237,0.00048606168,0.0005395598,0.0035760982,0.06526093,0.011411656,0.0029017653,0.015371403,0.00030776332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000958875,0.000005818861,0.00038645705,0.000057485933,0.0000045796587,0.00010866093,0.007906699,0.00015219937,0.00006236291,0.9618761,0.023201868,0.0062281583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023972196,0.0000143327825,0.0019599712,0.00073562807,0.000020240395,0.000111817484,0.0140609825,0.00054762623,0.0003826828,0.23211446,0.7499036,0.00012460812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95644534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95086336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09883508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09883508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11345421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71710205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553045836","doi":"","title":"The Legal Regulation of Adult Personal Relationships: Evaluating Policy Objectives and Legal Options in Federal Legislation","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Autonomy; Normative; Legislation; State (computer science); Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.04886430361492319,"score_gpt":0.3609186599814375,"score_spread":0.31205435636651435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553045836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24802086,0.019552685,0.012654384,0.2745221,0.0010204376,0.0019793434,0.00093599275,0.00019349577,0.44112074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91730624,0.0061119427,0.012964384,0.045257915,0.00076475897,0.001433204,0.0003111201,0.00006611205,0.015784381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9173838,0.036179043,0.0035013973,0.0038177301,0.022870755,0.016247302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74286956,0.20013382,0.012643736,0.0046210787,0.03293238,0.0067994352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15436989,0.00077984564,0.0012818414,0.008564972,0.013289198,0.02552427,0.006144748,0.017726798,0.0096872365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16480665,0.00090917293,0.0018603206,0.0064524505,0.017086023,0.023154102,0.009139056,0.011767087,0.0006110353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016752919,0.00044931454,0.010175934,0.0004268439,0.0000486233,0.0001668724,0.005203196,0.0020136419,0.00023844559,0.94074374,0.010667329,0.029698476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005617177,0.0017175821,0.058024514,0.01262503,0.0012848905,0.00023737944,0.067235515,0.021709623,0.003566209,0.5503221,0.28226602,0.00044952377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13960098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23070152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15436989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05648063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10023987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81639576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553136995","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v33i3.12146","title":"THE PURPOSE AND AMBIT OF THE OFFENCE OF CONCEALMENT OF BIRTH S v Molefe 2012 (2) SACR 574 (GNP)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Dignity; Political science; Statutory law; Statute; Context (archaeology); Constitution; Memorandum; Criminology; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.01943973870665325,"score_gpt":0.2838164968300847,"score_spread":0.2643767581234314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553136995","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10203065,0.0040716035,0.0029511158,0.14285254,0.0029504576,0.00017908445,0.00032107387,0.00009117128,0.74455225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66636163,0.0026558025,0.0019053217,0.14844157,0.0011293804,0.0002791297,0.00010863616,0.000063935695,0.17905463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99482995,0.0011002193,0.00025910104,0.00072422525,0.0017763509,0.0013101388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800557,0.0011177178,0.00020903943,0.00011603681,0.0003706332,0.0001810601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041799173,0.00037373256,0.00038063436,0.0008033063,0.008517954,0.005846997,0.0020382875,0.014507472,0.003825946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011340705,0.0006621393,0.0005472648,0.00055865804,0.010689909,0.0021760624,0.0038385557,0.012569089,0.000864682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002891824,0.000028326529,0.0023421675,0.000062880405,0.00001123434,0.0019727675,0.01470148,0.00012443426,0.0007335644,0.9097036,0.056809776,0.0134809315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048621638,0.00014113134,0.011768323,0.00121602,0.000060598442,0.00257259,0.014203635,0.0005214035,0.002216487,0.08404308,0.88303274,0.00017542385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1789721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2696331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1789721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008152015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011285153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3558607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553239706","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00664.x","title":"ELIJAH AND ISHMAEL","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04656544069678336,"score_gpt":0.3466051547816502,"score_spread":0.30003971408486685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553239706","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03895141,0.15886916,0.0016775662,0.13020214,0.0045935013,0.00014917814,0.0005885689,0.00007506623,0.66489345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43176812,0.10333745,0.0027326783,0.09287682,0.0021931874,0.000119589735,0.00055187516,0.000065874694,0.36635447],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981184,0.00022731791,0.0000653486,0.00013669382,0.000986447,0.00046575532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975473,0.00058435346,0.00012845946,0.000058952297,0.0014581326,0.00022276049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021513617,0.00023941553,0.00035534237,0.0021266444,0.0047453665,0.003692467,0.00087587367,0.0016109555,0.010678937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00696099,0.00013908512,0.00027181543,0.0016112184,0.0026076648,0.0012937757,0.0015177657,0.0015479177,0.0011871759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011966414,0.00006272414,0.013678588,0.00072781986,0.000049987728,0.0010950395,0.005665087,0.00035448078,0.00049619324,0.34308872,0.42239952,0.21226211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024055482,0.000027856882,0.018023467,0.0008768292,0.00006577096,0.000451856,0.005974137,0.00011447459,0.00050502684,0.01570598,0.9582041,0.000026308297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43783423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61784256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43783423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008259258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020183612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8705715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554265050","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1188","title":"How Can There Be Any Sin in Sincere?: State Inquiries into Sincerity of Religious Belief","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sincerity; Supreme court; Plaintiff; Law; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Charter; Jurisprudence; Political science; Establishment Clause; Sociology; First amendment; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03357084138449772,"score_gpt":0.32650249332713077,"score_spread":0.29293165194263304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554265050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36703503,0.0502586,0.0012440558,0.28499037,0.00057167764,0.000064552914,0.00016130389,0.00001543966,0.29565886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96852183,0.0068366467,0.00018418772,0.017553406,0.00013127088,0.0000144244,0.000029457167,0.0000029792843,0.0067258324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960898,0.0021121665,0.0001066745,0.0002490147,0.00087372126,0.00056864484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881203,0.008913608,0.00080423016,0.00027440686,0.0015168667,0.00037063003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007753288,0.00008750267,0.00026556608,0.00093164935,0.0065573435,0.0050522694,0.00092720124,0.003851657,0.0013730995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021035088,0.00027157273,0.00022205508,0.001250192,0.012551101,0.003573209,0.0015885797,0.004876364,0.00019376645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010262992,0.0001555167,0.053657185,0.00038390674,0.000048548525,0.0019243046,0.085870154,0.00031088054,0.0007281415,0.7194358,0.048461564,0.08892137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012680177,0.0002231757,0.1594636,0.0025668484,0.00021933088,0.0014256856,0.1886975,0.0008247676,0.0024885368,0.22317442,0.42061082,0.00017857188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29545894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5360328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29545894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007563957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019658284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5874784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555512450","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Legal Traditions in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Ethnology; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.032543978217943276,"score_gpt":0.27495295135436754,"score_spread":0.24240897313642426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555512450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7200318,0.011748238,0.0005452099,0.023363944,0.0003042052,0.00012389444,0.00045010648,0.00004487617,0.24338771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759605,0.0043391613,0.00048250344,0.0016906979,0.00002561011,0.00002240882,0.000098859724,0.000015999321,0.017364219],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997083,0.00027141336,0.00008175446,0.00024027553,0.0010187265,0.0013047437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935715,0.00068878947,0.00044546934,0.00015291623,0.0022855606,0.0028557496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019222002,0.00017843457,0.00041980052,0.0030967467,0.039532814,0.005301027,0.0017917287,0.00094447954,0.008082276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047530364,0.0002636191,0.00024341172,0.0050352677,0.009253257,0.001336574,0.004447702,0.002636601,0.0002776368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000743367,0.00016315853,0.06923893,0.00052798574,0.00005749891,0.0034583365,0.57216996,0.0005016534,0.0011178673,0.19949791,0.03981829,0.11337404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024027046,0.00005054504,0.18084545,0.001410976,0.000065474356,0.0008196156,0.35456318,0.0005232669,0.00031329016,0.010167979,0.45107383,0.00014240992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99609286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.101630844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.101630844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20536785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7373868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555998629","doi":"","title":"Notes Towards a (Re)Definition of the 'Secular'","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularization; Secularism; Judgement; Secular education; Multiculturalism; Supreme court; Law; Secular state; Religious freedom; Sociology; Economic Justice; Political science; Economic freedom","score_opus":0.02489225236138337,"score_gpt":0.28958999143954367,"score_spread":0.2646977390781603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555998629","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009357314,0.00867604,0.012824913,0.68840414,0.0047413437,0.00006668322,0.00038247168,0.00010043863,0.2754466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40848288,0.0051737684,0.022158545,0.41775295,0.0045559527,0.00020176574,0.0003143919,0.0001807625,0.14117905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99359244,0.0013830538,0.00026281204,0.0007760123,0.0031671084,0.0008185668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948338,0.0012879783,0.00038398043,0.00040593854,0.002652987,0.00043529048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061527267,0.00057350646,0.00045622938,0.0012763208,0.006952056,0.007988554,0.003406254,0.0070554456,0.0039606895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006587525,0.00029912827,0.00048455803,0.0017164398,0.03735723,0.0065777246,0.0032962488,0.018681679,0.00074519805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025456704,0.0000035270539,0.00010456432,0.000014752578,0.0000012326951,0.000026634685,0.004119362,0.00003643795,0.000059002712,0.962526,0.031495553,0.0016103004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011945153,0.000011368866,0.0015504367,0.00019220289,0.0000071908657,0.00012356174,0.004904206,0.0002965387,0.00023389718,0.20860244,0.78402936,0.000036771842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49174204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53707755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49174204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020825459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024658058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9777596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556327190","doi":"","title":"Dad, Mom – and Mom: The Ontario Court of Appeal's Decision in A.A. v. B.B.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Jurisdiction; Victory; Political science; Court decision; High Court; Lesbian; Sociology; Humanities; Philosophy; Gender studies; Politics","score_opus":0.01897014777385567,"score_gpt":0.2812256256466143,"score_spread":0.2622554778727586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556327190","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03907685,0.012487323,0.0011039362,0.31757784,0.0054809987,0.00044232656,0.002237733,0.00015573436,0.6214373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24459632,0.005941462,0.001313707,0.123295605,0.0011440275,0.0002652807,0.0006048555,0.00013867923,0.62270004],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955439,0.00036870493,0.00012816333,0.00035927419,0.0016759972,0.0019240394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976376,0.00038361372,0.00007362195,0.00006380253,0.00100661,0.00083477003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026417582,0.00055076333,0.00046077828,0.0008034782,0.028134324,0.0054996554,0.0020516708,0.0106503,0.012474922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00566639,0.000994062,0.0008212063,0.0009295142,0.0034660692,0.0012714445,0.001694225,0.007319008,0.0017394364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010336602,0.000048794296,0.005748875,0.00008418357,0.00003074376,0.0025243985,0.008018849,0.00014899108,0.0010955035,0.12871617,0.84230167,0.011178409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050918537,0.000016324564,0.010170499,0.00017166729,0.000051642368,0.00022304938,0.0048137386,0.00019757614,0.00040913085,0.0034113654,0.9803909,0.0000931818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9807271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9807271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.096198484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.110910475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6979721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556405244","doi":"","title":"Review of Elizabeth A. Sheehy, Ed, Sexual Assault in Canada: Law, Legal Practice and Women's Activism (Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2012)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Law; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Medicine; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control","score_opus":0.015264574689944228,"score_gpt":0.2724021358382428,"score_spread":0.25713756114829855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556405244","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000219281,0.9920133,0.000015376818,0.0047800373,0.0024969394,0.000004895509,0.00007418159,0.0000020056307,0.00059132767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003500645,0.99369824,0.00003523182,0.0033908782,0.0015883907,0.0000084913945,0.000070880466,0.0000025885317,0.00085519365],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983767,0.00021497459,0.0002591395,0.00017286728,0.00082852866,0.00014773718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98849165,0.0032063413,0.00080189965,0.00016943195,0.0063969367,0.0009338072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003091643,0.0011507669,0.0029112438,0.010589312,0.0015520074,0.003687301,0.0024705727,0.002854833,0.007899784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012252431,0.0006888125,0.00083119824,0.01711928,0.0017167324,0.0029722673,0.0018274185,0.0028805523,0.0029178842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033408152,0.000013305863,0.0002621087,0.01708499,0.000073129086,0.00008529248,0.00020196193,0.00007217062,0.000052339812,0.001085851,0.8253677,0.15566772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001182976,0.000010548855,0.001990813,0.022085119,0.00009349454,0.0002570199,0.0002062719,0.000014862926,0.00003073013,0.0002146116,0.9750634,0.000021274042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27707586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49943274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7229241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011466489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032411266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5509262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556582867","doi":"","title":"Gregory J. Zubacz, Le secret sacramentel et le droit canadien","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.02440750287928169,"score_gpt":0.268893358091003,"score_spread":0.2444858552117213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556582867","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007870017,0.32060197,0.00060698105,0.59417003,0.0063180155,0.0000322016,0.00036275722,0.000038827206,0.06999914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20646268,0.41211563,0.0021354966,0.18941063,0.008956886,0.00015609678,0.0002775022,0.00024323365,0.18024191],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989229,0.00047414537,0.000067070694,0.00013432695,0.00024918004,0.00015239336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997954,0.0015596285,0.000113001486,0.00005410269,0.00018724361,0.00013198091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002167133,0.00057572016,0.00069328723,0.0014217157,0.005031829,0.0039478345,0.0011060117,0.0076853745,0.009364198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005049933,0.0003641605,0.00029466735,0.0021464222,0.0041843834,0.0058315867,0.0020496508,0.005519601,0.0015916025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058433325,0.000056024248,0.001512631,0.00035892037,0.000020770509,0.00037493804,0.0129870735,0.00014128404,0.00015415202,0.3280775,0.6250339,0.031224344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028126658,0.000018556984,0.0053628944,0.00089593726,0.000015311183,0.0003267793,0.009460259,0.000096697804,0.0002518548,0.044169206,0.9393186,0.000055924538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07893067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1320687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9210693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030394413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031719122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15694249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556595640","doi":"","title":"Physicians and Marriage Commissioners: Accommodation of Differing Beliefs in a Free and Democratic Society","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Accommodation; Democracy; Dissent; Free Exercise Clause; Law; Political science; Opt-out; Constitutional right; Freedom of choice; Constitution; First amendment; Psychology; Business; Politics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.015928948629520042,"score_gpt":0.269508878975938,"score_spread":0.25357993034641796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556595640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75649893,0.0011565218,0.001497472,0.09186448,0.00018241716,0.000037749927,0.000018824747,0.000011800835,0.14873175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966551,0.000087725784,0.000115093426,0.0018941229,0.00002189801,0.00000575696,0.000001825411,0.0000012756092,0.0012172123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97895664,0.012057458,0.0003836401,0.0007082081,0.0027527257,0.005141349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98360866,0.007883437,0.002086373,0.0008943818,0.0011417998,0.0043853936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010381517,0.00019466293,0.00039172164,0.0014690078,0.023817638,0.008625667,0.0011876848,0.004930793,0.003770678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026000252,0.0003891037,0.00031460766,0.001352237,0.047580708,0.004402336,0.011189712,0.004848128,0.00017081105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013869951,0.00014935108,0.02039172,0.000025907182,0.00001591693,0.0009945839,0.4262912,0.00024445128,0.0003605727,0.5345794,0.0024586953,0.014349515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003087229,0.00018301257,0.037335984,0.00023147945,0.00004532429,0.00070173753,0.64859694,0.0007431545,0.00034354924,0.23791175,0.073480636,0.00011776671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17774521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28724036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17774521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01905917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03136094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35342127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560096757","doi":"10.24908/jcri.v1i1.3549","title":"Intersectionality: Crossing the Theoretical and Praxis Divide","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Critical Race Inquiry","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Intersectionality; Praxis; Appeal; Gender studies; Sociology; Power (physics); Intersection (aeronautics); Subject (documents); Vulnerability (computing); Criminology; Political science; Law; Politics; Geography; Computer security","score_opus":0.08625279896368111,"score_gpt":0.40141269945415575,"score_spread":0.31515990049047465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560096757","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1001024,0.0072036535,0.05581297,0.09157721,0.0008398611,0.0001570538,0.00006181345,0.00009362221,0.7441514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771707,0.001447484,0.007208338,0.0024721553,0.000409009,0.00027727807,0.00003317779,0.00007237309,0.010909508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9651667,0.023815915,0.0007410916,0.0028006847,0.0045745634,0.0029011243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852691,0.008666209,0.0012893953,0.0021337238,0.0014987874,0.0011427222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026377033,0.0008764902,0.0012980798,0.0062471535,0.02409561,0.02766012,0.0044335295,0.005751986,0.007576925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0200804,0.0008925093,0.0011734517,0.0027936578,0.16305034,0.034327444,0.039073225,0.012856423,0.0006873331],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059747244,0.000008045983,0.00020784634,0.000024841846,0.0000036277713,0.000057688507,0.0352569,0.00003297202,0.00003667933,0.96175456,0.00043195963,0.0021788862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001500238,0.000023512397,0.00041898235,0.00026068764,0.00001395297,0.00022106196,0.07274253,0.0002731467,0.00020215141,0.8728988,0.05291318,0.000017070806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007251863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005968745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02766012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012519822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013171739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13949674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560846001","doi":"","title":"Rule 17 - Service Outside Ontario","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Service (business); Business; Operations management; Engineering; Marketing","score_opus":0.02064223474017416,"score_gpt":0.2885842520871835,"score_spread":0.26794201734700934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560846001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020997819,0.0002644709,0.0012429279,0.016071137,0.0003645677,0.00016676931,0.0010731848,0.00006602365,0.95975316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29031208,0.00028382905,0.00063872075,0.023140658,0.00013249686,0.00020364343,0.00041764954,0.00007592064,0.6847951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99224114,0.0003323301,0.00016685366,0.0009216754,0.0023136328,0.004024271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730563,0.00027662143,0.00013425639,0.00022436205,0.0014669419,0.00059218396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018469583,0.0003307472,0.000530622,0.0004572466,0.014058537,0.005892965,0.0017755437,0.0067279814,0.02697521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057057883,0.00045644338,0.00063670345,0.00092917914,0.0050560413,0.002475855,0.0037571518,0.0049876976,0.005397792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062262545,0.000029694773,0.0068325177,0.00009530771,0.000016974636,0.00091571786,0.014686616,0.00019121727,0.0006904285,0.7983326,0.16915698,0.008989771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003827134,0.00003474876,0.008823581,0.0002055981,0.000028765042,0.00030152994,0.01332274,0.0001798309,0.000620227,0.022823265,0.9535623,0.000059056663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93628937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97063106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06371063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025615955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06715133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1858576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560995469","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1255","title":"Supreme Court of Canada Equality Jurisprudence and “Everyday Life”","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Rhetoric; Conversation; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.059142146847460095,"score_gpt":0.34073004177769567,"score_spread":0.28158789493023556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560995469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0139063345,0.053305596,0.0018538745,0.25409427,0.0033779326,0.00012893131,0.00088768144,0.00007152482,0.67237383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5169954,0.023619141,0.0024773884,0.13304733,0.001797995,0.00023481369,0.0006575394,0.00009660244,0.32107377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99038786,0.0014181352,0.00038489565,0.0008642967,0.0042096414,0.0027351321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98998696,0.0042590355,0.00042872358,0.00035873635,0.0038303402,0.001136156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050274334,0.00046441553,0.0008815318,0.0019939172,0.023326142,0.013246429,0.0029965804,0.012659536,0.010036855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0144766765,0.00062810094,0.000671546,0.0035941044,0.012151096,0.0030941542,0.002431039,0.009766125,0.0010210022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000092360815,0.000015624828,0.0005106241,0.000061103296,0.00000731482,0.00018628144,0.0013217378,0.00012226892,0.00006686054,0.9007537,0.09088457,0.0060606925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003679548,0.000019034707,0.0068985447,0.0006853675,0.00005214567,0.00013420699,0.0025637362,0.00059757463,0.000254624,0.09975431,0.88890284,0.0001008014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9576216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9733027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08108176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08108176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14459983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5882921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565536381","doi":"10.7202/1071732ar","title":"Indian Rights for Indian Babies: Canada’s “Unstated Paternity” Policy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"First Peoples Child & Family Review An Interdisciplinary Journal Honouring the Voices Perspectives and Knowledges of First Peoples","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Algonquin College","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Charter; Law; Political science; Legislature; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Criminology; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.020530530683793062,"score_gpt":0.3114544653807892,"score_spread":0.2909239346969961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565536381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15194482,0.011775988,0.003008415,0.33974633,0.0024212932,0.00018736452,0.00050730706,0.00013933856,0.49026915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76399666,0.006986315,0.0042978823,0.12625882,0.00033034108,0.00009129682,0.00017598626,0.00006882906,0.097793795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99116945,0.0011970017,0.00019801514,0.0006267708,0.0035524073,0.0032563985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907498,0.0027225874,0.0004496766,0.00039350748,0.0030415573,0.0026428897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048728366,0.00024063645,0.000259641,0.0010145792,0.023707,0.008764904,0.002268769,0.0044603716,0.0035023117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008601345,0.00040233906,0.00042244932,0.0013933616,0.011056711,0.0015266394,0.0036487246,0.006941767,0.00022643416],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042447282,0.00007406786,0.011061173,0.0002873794,0.000026316033,0.0015421987,0.048207957,0.00055558264,0.0016123308,0.76089543,0.123263165,0.0524319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027552342,0.00006568149,0.03057529,0.00072916964,0.000075942386,0.00056001556,0.03746388,0.00064116216,0.0014959857,0.012186851,0.9159808,0.000197736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9898788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086712055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.086712055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3571761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62914294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565657572","doi":"","title":"Palliative Care: An Enforceable Canadian Human Right?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Palliative care; Human rights; Section (typography); Political science; Law; Medicine; Law and economics; Nursing; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.03656560940039169,"score_gpt":0.3094735965687212,"score_spread":0.27290798716832954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565657572","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024636619,0.009061355,0.007319433,0.55781543,0.0021259792,0.0001307563,0.00026723908,0.00006121515,0.39858186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79185873,0.0071308413,0.007888395,0.14142305,0.0006509481,0.000117776355,0.00019311646,0.00004555056,0.050691567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98151267,0.0037587078,0.0004928852,0.0016667494,0.007922415,0.004646562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986134,0.004679713,0.0009912088,0.00095485843,0.0050107166,0.0022294396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01202077,0.0003620169,0.00068398815,0.000987791,0.019897962,0.012380187,0.0025716457,0.007422542,0.0062952153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028525222,0.00039949047,0.00049083703,0.0016392079,0.02540389,0.0066025886,0.0046398523,0.010806851,0.0004062821],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011478755,0.000010656686,0.0007986798,0.000054216707,0.0000049392206,0.00007826267,0.004366039,0.0001783692,0.00008948146,0.9692469,0.015363335,0.009797736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006679725,0.000048977923,0.0075771725,0.0009822826,0.00003445919,0.00025574604,0.017234927,0.0007748214,0.0004984693,0.23137781,0.7409736,0.00017485139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9595186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9741266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07322883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07322883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30256733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53131485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566766146","doi":"10.7202/1071795ar","title":"From the House of Commons Resolution to Pictou Landing Band Council and Maurina Beadle v. Canada: An Update on the Implementation of Jordan’s Principle","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"First Peoples Child & Family Review An Interdisciplinary Journal Honouring the Voices Perspectives and Knowledges of First Peoples","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Commons; Political science; Resolution (logic); Law; Library science; Geography; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Parliament","score_opus":0.028900113840186228,"score_gpt":0.31901894963608207,"score_spread":0.29011883579589587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1566766146","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029176604,0.05098589,0.0013567662,0.845669,0.02578508,0.00064259884,0.0016277516,0.00022619942,0.07078916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029077834,0.028017636,0.005296665,0.82711166,0.0046994435,0.0009293671,0.0010100612,0.0004347265,0.10342258],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.93222106,0.005733259,0.006263268,0.0028344607,0.044389736,0.008558179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87659395,0.03210809,0.0049502808,0.0036293126,0.07105958,0.011658762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044707317,0.0010983318,0.002518393,0.0040903087,0.018729938,0.012458281,0.013770767,0.03361676,0.01022558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.100999035,0.0025010698,0.0023060367,0.0072496873,0.016060976,0.0068064034,0.010427013,0.03830199,0.0025499589],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003344814,0.000031382682,0.00067871605,0.0003933008,0.00003650645,0.00019835944,0.0027427315,0.00006719478,0.00017859528,0.019179903,0.9579678,0.018492136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042000145,0.000013784332,0.0023587083,0.0015792289,0.000049858667,0.00007314777,0.0014217012,0.000033505494,0.00024045061,0.0019793033,0.9920964,0.00011188477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9467043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96944517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91061306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08938693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4087199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6485506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568629683","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1097","title":"Book Review: The Best Interests of Children: An Evidence-Based Approach, by Paul Millar","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03499304200246577,"score_gpt":0.3174868482580874,"score_spread":0.2824938062556216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568629683","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000621417,0.8799523,0.00021693579,0.088240184,0.028419822,0.000067525434,0.00016846787,0.000017025543,0.0028555717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013025763,0.9098129,0.0006500331,0.058299944,0.023248289,0.00017423723,0.00018079368,0.000038217102,0.0062931194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99265105,0.0026654983,0.0011150254,0.00050452974,0.002884088,0.00017974002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9539206,0.034117892,0.0025921506,0.00050551665,0.007759832,0.0011040019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009043193,0.0012873306,0.0032481118,0.006356465,0.0013535107,0.0067271525,0.0028648367,0.0054746796,0.0058978917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051214278,0.0011578762,0.0008772856,0.008291971,0.0036831275,0.0063587087,0.001655885,0.008575734,0.0036182886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000135180835,0.000009735263,0.00005969529,0.002877309,0.000034597117,0.000027170485,0.00006252618,0.000046196474,0.00002241718,0.0016462557,0.97390115,0.021299312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055748973,0.000041945266,0.00097164954,0.028181912,0.000101981015,0.00038217776,0.00029545173,0.000118862314,0.00006287729,0.004367768,0.96538323,0.000036398393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017823895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044360455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017823895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060559516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0127525935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047825515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569182112","doi":"","title":"Facets of sovereignty. Institutions that Spur and Institutions that Retard Tribal Development","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Business; Indigenous; Negotiation; Market economy; Bond; Realm; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.168513268777627,"score_gpt":0.3896729111650689,"score_spread":0.2211596423874419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569182112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059256766,0.003926116,0.010270073,0.029129012,0.00045928068,0.00003914537,0.00019008128,0.00011180015,0.8966176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716939,0.0010042797,0.0010414541,0.003042163,0.00017696741,0.000028086135,0.00007427164,0.00004728445,0.022891527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785703,0.00066579925,0.0001265547,0.0003993348,0.0004813368,0.00046993297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958476,0.0008931943,0.0008697395,0.0010462076,0.0005194333,0.00082394335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002079168,0.00017335462,0.00022909131,0.0010291375,0.0034358827,0.007762339,0.00047687688,0.0017798321,0.015187523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007868081,0.00018151086,0.0003117203,0.0010222504,0.023268277,0.0066262153,0.0063580913,0.0041071335,0.0012019491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008809979,0.0000067629408,0.0013816664,0.000030557607,0.000006044549,0.000062416155,0.0020001773,0.00011373164,0.0002425521,0.98295605,0.0043242224,0.008866914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016462767,0.000033473792,0.0069331178,0.00018576371,0.000014883712,0.00049598067,0.004405134,0.0003760831,0.00030676954,0.7400695,0.24713828,0.000024551451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004046555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041679065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015187523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030639148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003285198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050807357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569251853","doi":"","title":"The Legal Genealogy of the Duty to Accommodate American and Canadian Workers with Disabilities: A Comparative Perspective","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Duty; Reasonable accommodation; Political science; Doctrine; Accommodation; Argument (complex analysis); Free Exercise Clause; Judicial interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Human rights; Sociology; First amendment; Supreme court; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03794136313233012,"score_gpt":0.3216593455414917,"score_spread":0.28371798240916163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569251853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09968225,0.016594661,0.002508575,0.05173314,0.00036811843,0.000036474983,0.00015760642,0.000029367058,0.8288897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9606856,0.006644625,0.0009092491,0.004731028,0.00010715391,0.000031627365,0.000068440575,0.000026680578,0.02679552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542505,0.0006668715,0.000056023146,0.00031591544,0.0016605564,0.0018755735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99637693,0.0012118765,0.00021759715,0.000117530246,0.0014363795,0.0006397146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030446954,0.00031591815,0.00047435617,0.006411617,0.03298404,0.011087197,0.0025329152,0.0042109448,0.006867361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008116355,0.00033092382,0.0003544541,0.006282649,0.04496715,0.0044515356,0.0033597592,0.004565709,0.00023430285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013887406,0.000011051866,0.0014440487,0.000043643166,0.0000046442115,0.00022747992,0.059015486,0.00015031807,0.00011589655,0.921217,0.004800362,0.012956101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025505466,0.000046835383,0.035703957,0.0010642965,0.000057917765,0.0007264367,0.20974453,0.0006763054,0.00029336562,0.1257337,0.62580585,0.00012128229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98203707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9875964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14639327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14639327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09767836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99006283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569342319","doi":"","title":"From Same-Sex to No Sex? Trends Towards Recognition of (Same-Sex) Relationships in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle journal for social justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Lesbian; Politics; Gender studies; Citizenship; Sociology; Inclusion (mineral); Space (punctuation); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.11429887837325639,"score_gpt":0.34382111043300456,"score_spread":0.22952223205974817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569342319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93004924,0.0045107566,0.0003421278,0.03113623,0.00017556011,0.00006246734,0.0009774864,0.000035277124,0.03271085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880465,0.0020286797,0.00018279662,0.0020518347,0.000012677119,0.000011444995,0.00020911417,0.000013249384,0.0074435878],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966743,0.00019092529,0.00009927903,0.0003384067,0.0009843437,0.0017126475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932969,0.00046185387,0.0009174293,0.00012208684,0.0023705205,0.00283109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001198311,0.00017754221,0.00043470052,0.0017344052,0.018436704,0.004938869,0.0021207752,0.0015041649,0.0055680764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050870115,0.00027844214,0.00033612744,0.0046057845,0.004209859,0.0012579293,0.002755351,0.0027364215,0.00026465158],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035133908,0.00022183883,0.5100182,0.00064124557,0.000077881734,0.0041948743,0.23662673,0.00063282903,0.0032647136,0.06748584,0.03958443,0.13690007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002147512,0.00007446008,0.5001804,0.00059585145,0.000049484075,0.0010686212,0.3624735,0.0008520977,0.0012994573,0.0016588793,0.1315584,0.00016742625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99865437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.119572446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.119572446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18305562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8675629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1571061836","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal Title and Section 88 of the Indian Act","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Supreme court; Law; Jurisdiction; Principal (computer security); Section (typography); Constitution; Federal jurisdiction; Political science; Power (physics); Business","score_opus":0.012835001518208228,"score_gpt":0.31061121143121995,"score_spread":0.29777620991301174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1571061836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053668626,0.002993721,0.0008102971,0.012659485,0.0004867774,0.00015540412,0.00065033865,0.00008536763,0.92849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45034674,0.0027077133,0.0024744296,0.03494752,0.0003674966,0.00041398863,0.0007761832,0.00004881624,0.50791717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947583,0.0005249684,0.0002212227,0.00033266135,0.00214111,0.002021579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770194,0.0005865524,0.00025844082,0.00019176299,0.0009503061,0.00031104244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019127405,0.00026738338,0.0002651916,0.0010194868,0.0075722984,0.0037744164,0.0011539711,0.0038746528,0.0043183854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056038313,0.00049605983,0.00036480319,0.0011416853,0.004364578,0.0006651391,0.002122448,0.0040876875,0.001419741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050654922,0.000045214834,0.0044744615,0.00008616052,0.000014002348,0.00047101054,0.014784599,0.00024319348,0.00091090694,0.8803805,0.08566389,0.01287538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032366475,0.000059977774,0.030120287,0.00027265717,0.000062185805,0.00028112825,0.0033914405,0.00021369108,0.0006775976,0.013916606,0.95090467,0.00006736841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84691906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9083033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15308094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0117054805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04088227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30796486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1571323056","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1259","title":"(Ab)Originalism and Canada’s Constitution","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Constitution; Treaty; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional interpretation; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Relation (database); Law of the land; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04329375384612381,"score_gpt":0.3276469139933314,"score_spread":0.2843531601472076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1571323056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034795843,0.004249295,0.002955452,0.05262075,0.0004278828,0.00006357954,0.00058079645,0.000062223815,0.90424424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9096084,0.001988022,0.002530827,0.013347826,0.00018526707,0.0000596233,0.00022477064,0.00005039999,0.07200485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927382,0.0008292339,0.00015772808,0.00088319526,0.0031623342,0.0022291967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99486417,0.0014677709,0.0002907977,0.00047132626,0.0024471655,0.00045876042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00407821,0.00020789776,0.0003481833,0.0016092415,0.015270792,0.009173462,0.0014303406,0.0033755486,0.0063458756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00841367,0.00023982495,0.0003787787,0.002829478,0.024098277,0.0018424813,0.0022827617,0.0046297666,0.00032858332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039042766,0.0000021283374,0.00023764498,0.000013431763,0.0000020012858,0.000035720303,0.0014584298,0.000073193136,0.00003567312,0.9889292,0.006840988,0.0023676807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052629202,0.000017234372,0.008230446,0.00036587624,0.00004595613,0.00018612767,0.0034816684,0.0006509015,0.000352217,0.28917208,0.6973635,0.0000814013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9604872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9718935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06486953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06486953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1095252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4706636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572102169","doi":"","title":"Chapter 9: R v. Gladue: Sentencing and the Gendered Impacts of Colonialism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Colonialism; Criminology; Legislature; Political science; Criminal justice; Gender studies; Intervention (counseling); Sociology; Economic Justice; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.022025082000075226,"score_gpt":0.282097357759439,"score_spread":0.26007227575936376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572102169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053545557,0.034749884,0.002334021,0.17278312,0.0018826289,0.00021476914,0.00041190808,0.00014668069,0.7339315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6133196,0.019911189,0.002992526,0.09766961,0.00069269683,0.00018069266,0.00010517188,0.00011240497,0.2650161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933373,0.0011994526,0.0001510194,0.0005126212,0.0028507325,0.0019489537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800545,0.0008870286,0.00014404934,0.00007068297,0.0006759236,0.00021685952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00274679,0.0004093192,0.00043085846,0.0009239268,0.022037813,0.008625422,0.0023024378,0.008096357,0.0051164906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056091533,0.0003757091,0.00057526573,0.0008909434,0.012062771,0.0020599137,0.0032400277,0.008094063,0.00067533867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025228075,0.00003522832,0.002642017,0.00030234264,0.000014722411,0.0016160656,0.0753,0.00045604724,0.0010543525,0.7136979,0.17527354,0.029582588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014319537,0.000037690093,0.010526528,0.0015337946,0.00004310637,0.0011314148,0.040624414,0.00032308727,0.0011260208,0.03314463,0.91138965,0.0001053456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89864033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94583374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.101359665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040728904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050730675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2955103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572179965","doi":"","title":"Does No 'No' Mean Reasonable Doubt? Assessing the Impact of Ewanchuk on Determinations of Consent","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Supreme court; Sexual assault; Law; Political science; Psychology; Informed consent; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Medicine","score_opus":0.01802075574261593,"score_gpt":0.34540255653344726,"score_spread":0.32738180079083135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572179965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59356934,0.007450165,0.0077287816,0.14913006,0.00072814565,0.0005214453,0.00013575096,0.0000306874,0.24070562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890731,0.0009013262,0.00089252193,0.0077519887,0.0001184906,0.000111196074,0.000010871437,0.0000108481445,0.0011297184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7950821,0.13881513,0.007394699,0.0064214594,0.04153174,0.010754807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.37559313,0.58008057,0.020830218,0.006367834,0.014377634,0.0027506694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18557078,0.00051242247,0.0011613198,0.0043933396,0.01199416,0.013595432,0.0042108865,0.009621144,0.0039068363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4890184,0.0009552508,0.0013797896,0.0041383854,0.06699598,0.02155209,0.016144047,0.015883591,0.00042901724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005854952,0.00022004935,0.04637777,0.00043316916,0.00013241323,0.0012680929,0.052150764,0.001338104,0.00048523338,0.8419389,0.0044376515,0.050632324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025991927,0.0010935868,0.09492288,0.003053363,0.0006862003,0.0013883661,0.11464408,0.0075467895,0.003997629,0.7159045,0.056050364,0.0004524042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042417783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06757053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18557078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022575699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022435268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9814038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572565470","doi":"","title":"Symes v. Canada","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Shadow (psychology); Political science; Work (physics); Constitutional right; Inequality; Law; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.018840764064398614,"score_gpt":0.23528344492949993,"score_spread":0.21644268086510132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572565470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011190896,0.003117685,0.0006754328,0.0978704,0.0018385731,0.00014211313,0.0010684708,0.00014172362,0.8839547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13310306,0.0019361642,0.0005837461,0.14084181,0.0002879659,0.000118540374,0.00044549513,0.000104932355,0.7225782],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928807,0.0003566421,0.00011851286,0.00078857533,0.0027289104,0.0031266233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741995,0.00031829948,0.00006193616,0.00010999212,0.0014834147,0.0006063727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019299218,0.00069296814,0.00055400684,0.0011158219,0.025160424,0.006856371,0.0017737554,0.009737259,0.031217594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006033668,0.00068471144,0.00084811874,0.0011682449,0.0040115826,0.0018294662,0.0031397734,0.011582816,0.0028150722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005340527,0.000020993755,0.0020497455,0.0000770377,0.000021593552,0.00097155134,0.0013839531,0.00020960817,0.00048191033,0.3910397,0.5876615,0.016029086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032638556,0.000024856068,0.0029257084,0.00015650512,0.000031529074,0.00029305278,0.0015264085,0.00028212057,0.000483702,0.010327073,0.98384213,0.000074202486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9640061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98423785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049657002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049657002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13910455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36028844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573318334","doi":"","title":"Judicial reasoning about pregnancy and choice.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Law; Supreme court; Criminal code; Entitlement (fair division); Political science; Abortion law; Legislation; Criminal law; Charter; Criminalization; Sociology; Family planning; Population; Economics","score_opus":0.04733970416552328,"score_gpt":0.28252392936077947,"score_spread":0.2351842251952562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573318334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012555406,0.04616944,0.012935218,0.27098125,0.002929787,0.00013928769,0.00031630116,0.00006569603,0.6539076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7581926,0.020655025,0.008848261,0.08737628,0.0028908425,0.00018029314,0.00017576311,0.000063474596,0.12161747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99240476,0.0025083185,0.00026468158,0.00068033085,0.0022925865,0.0018493364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954205,0.0028516618,0.00026646734,0.00015900492,0.0009647107,0.0003375888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009811359,0.00051730673,0.00048005994,0.0013353588,0.013727619,0.0071744835,0.0021797067,0.009524406,0.005030478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013785935,0.0004419989,0.00066947454,0.0012334835,0.029681597,0.0038989796,0.0027411738,0.009426182,0.0005911517],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059017825,0.0000029548269,0.00014585916,0.000014691127,0.00000350351,0.00013551232,0.0022105437,0.000104104634,0.000039540577,0.9818341,0.01307551,0.0024276937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026020458,0.000012390703,0.00069467747,0.00027870352,0.000024401477,0.0001731226,0.0034332648,0.0005286372,0.00017103697,0.71462274,0.28000602,0.000029037667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5160147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6224279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5160147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02757114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03696803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9736712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575708530","doi":"","title":"In Search of Canadian Political Theory of Liberal Multiculturalism","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"한국정치학회보","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Multiculturalism; Political philosophy; Communitarianism; Minority rights; Political science; Politics; Liberal democracy; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Epistemology; Democracy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.047927071789806736,"score_gpt":0.3363337737506186,"score_spread":0.28840670196081186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575708530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016322523,0.0038485962,0.0056356923,0.06578258,0.00043798846,0.000028321856,0.0000607494,0.000021742928,0.9078618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88505083,0.0036920626,0.0041375095,0.012571839,0.0004435787,0.000070723945,0.000075519376,0.00004053653,0.09391739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735874,0.000553849,0.0000319017,0.0002850351,0.0009983849,0.0007721611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809057,0.0005540588,0.00012313797,0.0001586615,0.0006731314,0.0004005156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002299608,0.00035318613,0.00042394438,0.0018375271,0.014132915,0.0070633874,0.0012350396,0.0020652658,0.006905604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041198754,0.00018801905,0.00040248965,0.0025449975,0.023393905,0.004154545,0.0032218548,0.004481776,0.0005266673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014716893,0.0000021335168,0.00006569179,0.000004810404,4.38837e-7,0.000009470869,0.0009595659,0.000043901113,0.000008659726,0.99613416,0.0016650618,0.001104581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009314272,0.0000045552033,0.00090735476,0.00006556499,0.0000037564466,0.00004680659,0.0024628006,0.0005883779,0.00006193307,0.80607206,0.18976359,0.000013952419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70203084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6803139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29796916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05739305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04055658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5994479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579304025","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2012.01446.x","title":"MARRIAGE: CIVIL, RELIGIOUS, CONTRACTUAL, AND MORE*","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marriage law; Law; Family law; Civil law (Civil law); Religious law; Sociology; Judaism; Political science; State (computer science); Public law; Islam; History","score_opus":0.03992372588675457,"score_gpt":0.34675615129486087,"score_spread":0.3068324254081063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579304025","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009219238,0.9793896,0.00014134619,0.0073274155,0.0008618093,0.000003572962,0.000005085463,0.0000014051533,0.0113478415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.062332723,0.92302674,0.0002954716,0.007737334,0.002608784,0.000025695203,0.0000319337,0.0000045420347,0.0039368086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944482,0.003414556,0.00038193795,0.00031610244,0.0011631926,0.00027595513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99690944,0.0016021514,0.00041797291,0.00017691658,0.0006945859,0.00019894452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042871065,0.00036190267,0.000801017,0.0030238302,0.0020894313,0.0045717154,0.00086790783,0.0025415558,0.0029921134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004390108,0.00029781903,0.00037074642,0.0046436377,0.01097023,0.0062544513,0.0021171535,0.002302175,0.00049403124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069830676,0.00007948945,0.0015451445,0.00618536,0.000080457736,0.00024481682,0.011427047,0.00027975655,0.00026724322,0.5535479,0.047706146,0.37856677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002025586,0.00010907919,0.0042491425,0.006692019,0.00004354299,0.00047191195,0.009123375,0.000059763166,0.00008103201,0.05220414,0.9269235,0.000022156682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01630576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023458747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01630576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034328746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007139087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03242165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579334152","doi":"10.5040/9781472566461.ch-012","title":"‘Legal Form’ and the Purchase of Human Rights Discourse in Domestic Policy-Making: The Achievement of Same-Sex Marriage in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Gender studies; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02139120272411651,"score_gpt":0.29401274234925645,"score_spread":0.27262153962513996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579334152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1285652,0.015754351,0.0017423928,0.07521635,0.0004369802,0.00009473744,0.00019841286,0.000034509314,0.777957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9246746,0.0038277612,0.0007084706,0.0022728166,0.000043541484,0.000034814788,0.000040262497,0.000044697317,0.06835301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916325,0.0017114788,0.00015454204,0.00058723503,0.002417359,0.0034970331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951994,0.0018611973,0.00022361104,0.00019292237,0.0012925796,0.0012303845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046906522,0.00046475034,0.00078832183,0.00213036,0.04221677,0.016593995,0.0032031012,0.005630612,0.014294634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01173525,0.00068998133,0.0004195167,0.005579243,0.038717076,0.0055113877,0.0062549342,0.008268481,0.0005230164],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016987671,0.00002467697,0.0011925937,0.000041059957,0.000005083729,0.00017586231,0.0818636,0.0001578053,0.00007001686,0.89139867,0.009892859,0.015160785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045650213,0.000033855486,0.017106906,0.0009191504,0.000035043347,0.00027438038,0.22771685,0.0008685858,0.0005264588,0.18697254,0.5653595,0.00014108565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9933115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16207573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16207573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31550917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9718734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580151100","doi":"","title":"L.W. van Keuren, Raven, Stay by Me . St. John’s: Jesperson, 2009. ISBN: 1-894377-30-3.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Newfoundland and Labrador Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.046889195593381755,"score_gpt":0.30549101439285214,"score_spread":0.2586018187994704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580151100","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016005223,0.7186197,0.004407327,0.015084387,0.0044548186,0.00004821244,0.0029715262,0.0012374377,0.2515761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006548578,0.21455523,0.003834292,0.0011641926,0.0005250243,0.000051327628,0.0010739533,0.0008415572,0.7714059],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965465,0.000059135906,0.000044625267,0.0000750929,0.00013257144,0.000034083936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989773,0.0004161222,0.00011633348,0.00008558062,0.0002700234,0.0001346534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001052158,0.0021031566,0.00097265834,0.0020300113,0.0012684423,0.0023016986,0.0013743155,0.0018400196,0.23863594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018461136,0.0016245106,0.00039841642,0.002918381,0.00080849876,0.0043716934,0.0012149388,0.002521429,0.200955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041638916,0.000022573815,0.00017538966,0.0005233058,0.000009217523,0.000091063965,0.000303278,0.00015820358,0.00046408505,0.002391872,0.7766314,0.21918797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047528238,0.000017957302,0.001581728,0.0008989319,0.00000942765,0.00041244333,0.00044147886,0.00008339737,0.00025214223,0.000939857,0.9953413,0.000016495764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04094047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.106381744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23863594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014219878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017642615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7983168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581112853","doi":"10.53300/001c.5617","title":"Faith in the courts: The aggrieved faithful seeking standing in Australia","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.15229791589728242,"score_gpt":0.3931997543679755,"score_spread":0.24090183847069307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581112853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7032749,0.028597035,0.0014542934,0.094006106,0.00058065314,0.0000553461,0.000015809903,0.000010088737,0.17200582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751823,0.0060960483,0.00026432643,0.0061571808,0.00014498208,0.000011626336,0.000003874538,0.0000048976226,0.01213473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996358,0.0016448302,0.00012845678,0.00027551726,0.0009860952,0.0006071122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99508804,0.0025050598,0.0008269998,0.00021837083,0.00068815175,0.00067330344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046655675,0.00008747455,0.00027978653,0.0009518435,0.0090105925,0.004199272,0.0010499717,0.0035366404,0.0017299858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008635601,0.0002874668,0.00018505946,0.0010675229,0.017470332,0.0029807098,0.005294163,0.0062159966,0.00014095727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018295017,0.00007213346,0.00964782,0.00022329742,0.000013708165,0.0035020802,0.3500316,0.00015654984,0.00076457235,0.56592727,0.0070419554,0.062600695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021932448,0.0002966256,0.109993234,0.0020237789,0.00005504234,0.004129473,0.22716637,0.0009871452,0.0008367943,0.09511451,0.55922794,0.00014709991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09833676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18200262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09833676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006630033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010551041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19552875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1582570262","doi":"10.71781/2161","title":"Le meilleur intérêt de l'enfant, les tests de paternité et le droit civil québécois","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0327861671255256,"score_gpt":0.3348053880837998,"score_spread":0.30201922095827416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1582570262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32512686,0.026063053,0.03360447,0.07411271,0.0024456738,0.000709814,0.0057587954,0.00032676192,0.5318519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77475774,0.007185825,0.026073515,0.00921793,0.00023313335,0.0003959024,0.0013396463,0.000119493874,0.18067688],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922701,0.0028839605,0.00024000261,0.0009384495,0.0028924495,0.00077495776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98272645,0.0052851834,0.0017913989,0.000968174,0.0078252135,0.0014036554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076632597,0.000718024,0.00063393725,0.0028680502,0.0048872,0.0044407733,0.0019978762,0.0022184153,0.017930606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017798228,0.00032324967,0.0005373642,0.002224158,0.006295314,0.0019593076,0.0023831395,0.0023249248,0.0020664681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039938904,0.00016744809,0.38178536,0.0011310817,0.00028473558,0.0016860552,0.03494583,0.0015064063,0.006005638,0.10791259,0.05338562,0.41078976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023428744,0.00028826628,0.5692749,0.0018854723,0.00014834857,0.0016300424,0.023062602,0.0013930113,0.0036211787,0.0120561635,0.3863449,0.0002717353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8138818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89347243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18611819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01746205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029909818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3744285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586201112","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1739864","title":"The End of Umpire? Federalism and Judicial Restraint","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Law; Judicial restraint; Law and economics; Criminology; Psychology; Judicial review; Judicial activism; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.011636174354481423,"score_gpt":0.2816661873796392,"score_spread":0.2700300130251578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586201112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16061118,0.0038099668,0.0055123554,0.20004281,0.0007202389,0.000024912113,0.00010052017,0.00004635829,0.6291317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818278,0.00036288358,0.0003585449,0.008835214,0.0003425265,0.00002256453,0.000014293335,0.000023325076,0.00821293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98991174,0.004379164,0.00024946846,0.00096215965,0.001274051,0.0032235275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99009365,0.0053114183,0.001071743,0.0016319903,0.0010387453,0.0008524422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011146437,0.00021144157,0.0009448049,0.0012032796,0.013614989,0.0123061,0.002084222,0.011379199,0.011674855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027154421,0.0004283491,0.0006209269,0.0016376153,0.030485721,0.017149681,0.0065859556,0.013082317,0.0009257134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001335633,0.000013551817,0.00040469502,0.000004867301,0.0000029470361,0.000032806114,0.0024938113,0.000042266976,0.00003269826,0.9917338,0.003055952,0.0021693218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023548817,0.000016233744,0.002094937,0.00008230083,0.000010971142,0.000060796105,0.008170881,0.0002979879,0.00017458829,0.9526629,0.036379963,0.000024971903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016682278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02153655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016682278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005733459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007913189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058948696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586503665","doi":"","title":"L’évolution de la notion de conjoint en droit québécois","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007447764174238666,"score_gpt":0.19952034707720712,"score_spread":0.19207258290296844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586503665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20183809,0.008244061,0.056704536,0.028775813,0.0006313958,0.00009854938,0.0005465239,0.00015127103,0.7030097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9413443,0.00100129,0.0072774887,0.0010092856,0.00007110478,0.000048109974,0.000096235875,0.00008195006,0.049070127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964561,0.0013244735,0.00009561307,0.0007258268,0.0008374152,0.00056057144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952224,0.0012845895,0.0003692371,0.0005653259,0.0020885176,0.0004699575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038580569,0.0005589784,0.00058668765,0.0029234511,0.0154149085,0.010575731,0.002459558,0.0034590585,0.017773189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063778325,0.0005502462,0.0007211909,0.00488404,0.032645114,0.0065708854,0.0031620446,0.0060400367,0.00075706566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010482151,0.000004392238,0.0010827435,0.00001527304,0.00000856918,0.00008385365,0.0244333,0.00020146527,0.000114399765,0.9669334,0.001574491,0.0055376436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003127785,0.000051519153,0.02792144,0.0005236104,0.00006826735,0.00093918515,0.07408637,0.0045328513,0.0006165615,0.2158792,0.67515403,0.00019574846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.924854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9207094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07514602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0573672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02352751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41623008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586559163","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1137","title":"What is Left of Pelech?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Trilogy; Duty; Scholarship; Family law; Economic Justice; Politics; Duty to protect; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Law; Presumption; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.06554885058636634,"score_gpt":0.3457491903961765,"score_spread":0.2802003398098102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586559163","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05956585,0.11521867,0.0021297475,0.61773574,0.004782892,0.000030925523,0.00018495918,0.00008008835,0.20027113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7338525,0.036470212,0.0009098658,0.17492539,0.0018520495,0.00009372911,0.000117629825,0.000088571505,0.051689968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946709,0.0021036828,0.00020642533,0.00068196317,0.0013365223,0.0010003768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940732,0.0034213066,0.00038806858,0.00022877102,0.0012019541,0.00068670494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004385065,0.00016462691,0.0006562618,0.0012381726,0.012098493,0.010322301,0.0015289816,0.006531547,0.010145973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0201778,0.00027681483,0.0003731542,0.0013983792,0.0055583427,0.011666809,0.0039436966,0.006443088,0.0011351239],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016199268,0.00006212198,0.0049744863,0.00074003334,0.0000485039,0.00324555,0.024260918,0.00013499339,0.00062589784,0.5757319,0.19621092,0.19380267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010553108,0.00004465947,0.0029404992,0.0007111511,0.000037936137,0.0007405316,0.021601938,0.000102796505,0.0007655955,0.046935383,0.9260572,0.000051827734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031169055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028329525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031169055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053767255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00921383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06197524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589873774","doi":"10.17613/5c31h-0r405","title":"A Mulitfaceted Approach to Recognizing Canadian First Nations Governments: What Courts May Decide","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.03317547617391118,"score_gpt":0.28270208375447725,"score_spread":0.24952660758056608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589873774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04142939,0.0018888876,0.008441891,0.39924568,0.00094712625,0.00016680673,0.0005565221,0.00012224726,0.5472015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8560288,0.0014665748,0.012365173,0.054694712,0.0002969946,0.00012225076,0.00016011948,0.000065725,0.0747996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898726,0.0020680493,0.00022219388,0.0006377912,0.0032626002,0.00393674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98999107,0.0029196308,0.00031689255,0.00041002178,0.005068787,0.0012936424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0083491,0.000446506,0.00048794993,0.0027681945,0.026658174,0.021539234,0.0037996145,0.011431027,0.014725666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026888171,0.00046840886,0.0006668027,0.0024955096,0.013800628,0.008688861,0.004041389,0.010828455,0.00077746453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020606822,0.000031436815,0.0028669008,0.000038142007,0.000017029,0.00033646822,0.009144392,0.00042339007,0.00019619775,0.8882233,0.07943411,0.019268041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039401064,0.000039600192,0.011658063,0.0008367126,0.00014866049,0.000328798,0.081998006,0.007491312,0.0015637531,0.4961079,0.3994651,0.0003226876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92383355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97902745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07616645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06592863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16193451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47834796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592248204","doi":"","title":"Annotation to Droit De La Famille – 102866","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Common law; Autonomy; Economic Justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.008214677962475795,"score_gpt":0.2960763415355794,"score_spread":0.2878616635731036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592248204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006314946,0.002879813,0.00092700653,0.02034582,0.020669699,0.00021599524,0.02604122,0.00081315124,0.92747575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034203539,0.0013114995,0.0005219487,0.01378459,0.0023723005,0.0002227257,0.011026185,0.00045740503,0.96688294],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830925,0.00020138492,0.00011216244,0.00018904473,0.000845485,0.00034279667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99675924,0.00068087183,0.00012178644,0.00024860477,0.0019070408,0.00028251082],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013499741,0.00057590514,0.00061371486,0.002128904,0.00483517,0.0036743013,0.0015800671,0.0057915696,0.31452364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00536013,0.0003833033,0.0004808352,0.002649805,0.00083725626,0.0017501401,0.0023590904,0.003796466,0.18155308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005304952,0.000003428965,0.00004742112,0.000039675746,3.1760942e-7,0.000027579337,0.00009587262,0.000012309448,0.000040210598,0.0029943115,0.9919322,0.0048012375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016477871,0.000001373693,0.00038172025,0.00007712247,2.9708136e-7,0.000013345008,0.00007162977,0.000007771301,0.0000171016,0.0002164596,0.9992078,0.0000037200198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30300224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3367441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31452364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00713099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009286636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9777488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593698211","doi":"","title":"The Failure of the Daniels Case: Blindly Entrenching a Colonial Legacy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Jurisprudence; Law; Constitution; Indigenous; Political science; Colonialism; Interpretation (philosophy); Status quo; Plaintiff; Government (linguistics); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.009884495003646451,"score_gpt":0.2730486057882802,"score_spread":0.26316411078463375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593698211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10648045,0.004478005,0.0033747018,0.31623194,0.0023122607,0.000036424517,0.000058126614,0.00007473043,0.56695336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87280613,0.0015752492,0.0010799707,0.052114446,0.0009802722,0.000046373432,0.000022848244,0.000100799836,0.07127396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838838,0.0047766017,0.0008161833,0.0029759414,0.004495842,0.0030516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97726864,0.0153901195,0.0010581418,0.002366805,0.0020661433,0.0018501548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02104888,0.00028768586,0.00093760446,0.0012019863,0.020733904,0.014014422,0.0021465048,0.0127830375,0.005257213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04505456,0.00069953914,0.0005018086,0.0010341017,0.04708718,0.009269471,0.012008572,0.018612757,0.000993157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016245363,0.0000071874597,0.00030436553,0.000028170089,0.000003283878,0.0004039289,0.012126561,0.00004681041,0.00010571015,0.96857846,0.013853565,0.0045257984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006150855,0.000035760728,0.0010785805,0.0006170964,0.000025518288,0.0010368439,0.021699008,0.00036998198,0.0011148328,0.29361063,0.68026465,0.000085602056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06625865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.079678334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06625865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012501991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017855069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13174593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595154483","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1048","title":"Inclusive Equality and New Forms of Social Governance","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Dignity; Jurisprudence; Welfare state; Law and economics; Ideology; Liberalism; Neoliberalism (international relations); Social rights; Constitutional court; Supreme court; State (computer science); Law; Human rights; Sociology; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.05309269584456907,"score_gpt":0.3665112701150699,"score_spread":0.31341857427050085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595154483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06294943,0.01691448,0.09077872,0.07118423,0.00049160956,0.00012530838,0.000043374937,0.00007595308,0.75743693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97518176,0.0032384081,0.006698478,0.0022574284,0.00028876791,0.00011994915,0.000020862613,0.000016880917,0.012177442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864001,0.0075445236,0.00049326447,0.0015032041,0.0025939064,0.0014650415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942145,0.003143537,0.00076292874,0.0009336435,0.00046178742,0.00048363258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012253383,0.00032136394,0.00065217906,0.0020470873,0.0047459677,0.012135903,0.0015246818,0.002473743,0.0027975529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009339323,0.0003160983,0.00048129607,0.0014142892,0.061398666,0.011082106,0.01094707,0.0038644408,0.00023275382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.3450095e-7,0.0000025190975,0.00007453601,0.00000788286,0.0000020510258,0.000011075884,0.00082233973,0.00011440778,0.000017135371,0.9968592,0.00013987396,0.0019481811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035745234,0.0000068881823,0.00030728627,0.000042054424,0.0000026010273,0.000016018452,0.00081680896,0.00016507816,0.000041346128,0.9809733,0.01762157,0.000003467373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033976503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043236515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012253383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068029584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005269221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064802885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596745203","doi":"","title":"Poverty: Rights, Social Citizenship, and Legal Activism (review)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Humanities; Social activism; Poverty; Sociology; Ethnology; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.03650307164823102,"score_gpt":0.27295225635577847,"score_spread":0.23644918470754744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596745203","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001342827,0.9978598,0.000008274934,0.0014104745,0.00010600443,0.0000043846444,0.000013088994,8.880268e-7,0.00046280393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002251614,0.9967489,0.000027420447,0.0005354078,0.00013166472,0.000009994152,0.000017088223,6.4601574e-7,0.000277266],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989348,0.0003879338,0.00013093794,0.00007230936,0.00035858375,0.000115355695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955735,0.0025954964,0.0007343565,0.000052558327,0.0007711654,0.00027278098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021717532,0.00058307365,0.0016565442,0.0043669096,0.0008075513,0.002866732,0.0007594889,0.0015388913,0.0044538863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055427686,0.0003765625,0.0007359013,0.009057699,0.0017390357,0.001921656,0.0010355617,0.0012104264,0.0004406758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010259162,0.000054143296,0.0027619645,0.0532463,0.00042032212,0.00020626101,0.0006679232,0.00020999784,0.00011274494,0.0037688713,0.1400722,0.79837674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000798332,0.00013000144,0.03355994,0.13453043,0.0008804995,0.00082405756,0.0019393726,0.00010873717,0.00012171983,0.0027096618,0.82506394,0.000051928248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09919682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24687746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09919682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004075331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016359715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19723886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597131993","doi":"","title":"Developments in Aboriginal Law: The 2006-2007 Term","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Supreme court; Law; Treaty; Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.01193500166887916,"score_gpt":0.32564049527708283,"score_spread":0.31370549360820366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597131993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08273015,0.01343416,0.00081915734,0.10857322,0.0037838733,0.00025329934,0.00040809685,0.00006768911,0.7899303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40382448,0.011520826,0.0045278226,0.14866017,0.0022604521,0.00061432534,0.00047706114,0.000089690315,0.42802516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947733,0.0006317021,0.0003190477,0.00067194365,0.0019726688,0.0016313874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969817,0.00072012196,0.00025488937,0.00015226005,0.0010922431,0.0007987715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051304204,0.00037834852,0.00036435778,0.0012965939,0.0254682,0.0116986595,0.0026030268,0.0141407885,0.0034760681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061714654,0.00078419835,0.0008444343,0.0009895746,0.009245505,0.0030002482,0.005430478,0.018513905,0.00096405327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002616397,0.00007496836,0.001965718,0.000105776795,0.000008997676,0.0019002612,0.037452493,0.00015502107,0.0008717886,0.86924547,0.07836608,0.009827354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016622484,0.000081931954,0.006874014,0.0005720047,0.000029426974,0.00067314354,0.013089474,0.00019707251,0.00068223086,0.010167349,0.96753466,0.00008211938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6989167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78985614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30108333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050831478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06680122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6057129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598691393","doi":"10.21991/c9p07t","title":"THE REGULATION OF PRIVATE HEALTH CARE UNDER THE CANADA HEALTH ACT AND THE CANADIAN CHARTER","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Health care; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Business; Health policy; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.030519110586481518,"score_gpt":0.27547434307326224,"score_spread":0.24495523248678072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598691393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033587147,0.009550094,0.0051234276,0.32370844,0.0041922648,0.0007594618,0.00598921,0.00030476358,0.61678517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49294207,0.007969604,0.0169844,0.17170769,0.0021706528,0.0009655427,0.0023579772,0.0003035015,0.30459845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94879633,0.006418526,0.0017388909,0.002943938,0.02531211,0.014790238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95469403,0.0111265,0.0020515942,0.0024530308,0.020669095,0.009005802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016123505,0.0009929537,0.0014396104,0.0031844492,0.025999164,0.015867522,0.0049239965,0.016598586,0.0076676346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043005507,0.0021369897,0.0017877596,0.0050319433,0.017244749,0.003636963,0.0044030845,0.020337854,0.0007357923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045442124,0.000045704986,0.0012769811,0.000075402364,0.00003224189,0.00011256832,0.002664473,0.00065248564,0.00030374437,0.8780059,0.111344144,0.0054409546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029911188,0.000059092163,0.034779023,0.0008454719,0.00014036777,0.00012427737,0.003512807,0.002906328,0.00070100604,0.086165294,0.8698579,0.00060933625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99799806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7861591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21384092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.55730647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9118331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599589641","doi":"","title":"Particular Justice: Michel Bastarache and Family Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Duty; Family law; Law; Legislature; Sociology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.014755035102371921,"score_gpt":0.29807502051538093,"score_spread":0.283319985413009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599589641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18418208,0.027056517,0.005440678,0.3669457,0.0012080789,0.00002313693,0.000047240046,0.00008444208,0.41501215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95380294,0.0014786825,0.00075972424,0.019776186,0.00035368567,0.000009811387,0.000008709218,0.000022283884,0.023788026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801826,0.0010326247,0.000026318747,0.00025608367,0.00033046398,0.00033627648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985216,0.0007571218,0.00015941847,0.00006921861,0.00025284465,0.00023978997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017346893,0.00018813348,0.00019452191,0.0005598481,0.010000528,0.0033081246,0.0004933477,0.0034065975,0.0027218496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059484914,0.000116903626,0.00012918918,0.00039190144,0.008900378,0.0025182469,0.0018442905,0.003162225,0.00024325488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019710506,0.000027115986,0.002172198,0.000026268408,0.0000061641463,0.0008427608,0.04210734,0.0001699908,0.0003351833,0.8687127,0.06331532,0.022265233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008903452,0.000059051257,0.010173169,0.00024717877,0.0000110599285,0.001993388,0.023140712,0.0007337353,0.00066497544,0.24333474,0.7195849,0.000048313766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025663504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03626965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9743365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004683969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002893272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05102825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599730556","doi":"","title":"Legal Processes and Gendered Violence: Cross-Applications for Domestic Violence Protection Orders","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Respondent; Order (exchange); Political science; Law; Legislation; Civil defense; Common law; Criminology; Business; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Sociology; Medicine; Environmental health","score_opus":0.016781039668692536,"score_gpt":0.3206330723930911,"score_spread":0.30385203272439854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599730556","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20914276,0.027644241,0.014819159,0.08577265,0.00069946895,0.0002617002,0.0003566291,0.00009689886,0.66120654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96539104,0.00572611,0.0027080001,0.004980639,0.00037921141,0.00011882939,0.00014338919,0.0000496058,0.020503223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823095,0.0072964164,0.0009971558,0.0015545157,0.005516737,0.0023257472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93938255,0.043311752,0.0076931603,0.0018539913,0.005545645,0.002212987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014739211,0.00036455793,0.00045729152,0.0033447377,0.0077342396,0.012117835,0.0021378594,0.005799507,0.022466252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0547881,0.0006425165,0.0009461435,0.003232013,0.015602758,0.014016372,0.00926667,0.008461723,0.0013371692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021324668,0.00010278912,0.014334221,0.00014254887,0.000010525836,0.0010434854,0.04609162,0.00014553823,0.000106781175,0.90787953,0.0056235716,0.024498023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035541747,0.0001289117,0.0905392,0.0032587566,0.00006903022,0.003956824,0.10076268,0.0017432497,0.0006410499,0.45685765,0.34186167,0.00014543404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041531414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037444357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041531414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012344283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011452353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0895645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600158505","doi":"","title":"Law and religion: God, the state and the common law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Political science; Freedom of religion; Constitutional law; Common law; Politics; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Comparative law; State (computer science); Covenant; Free Exercise Clause; Religious law; Religious studies; Sociology; Philosophy; Human rights; Theology; Islam; Fundamental rights; Supreme court; First amendment; Right to property","score_opus":0.02092686578855391,"score_gpt":0.289701995672569,"score_spread":0.2687751298840151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600158505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002091732,0.24641424,0.0012358308,0.040072497,0.0033848,0.000029625804,0.00020583085,0.000055426677,0.70651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.122058675,0.12837617,0.0018355204,0.014034738,0.0063806875,0.00009874838,0.00043871746,0.000104958825,0.72667176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996544,0.00013276702,0.000008093821,0.000041397605,0.00013023433,0.00003306825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994424,0.0003253965,0.00003291178,0.000035712554,0.000091803224,0.00007171173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004402985,0.00046284354,0.0003750787,0.0009832784,0.0021193489,0.0039839516,0.0005254834,0.0012830396,0.025210192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011353802,0.00017973215,0.0001677095,0.0018203729,0.005408085,0.0034539995,0.0012442262,0.002346242,0.0036583045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006948717,0.000016198277,0.00014513015,0.0001269213,0.0000018318844,0.000053867167,0.0036826627,0.00008677911,0.000046341815,0.6432416,0.32048333,0.03210844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002441252,0.000005968439,0.0004000003,0.00034733838,0.0000010990476,0.00007258222,0.0016956165,0.000034006312,0.000013909205,0.0739407,0.92348355,0.0000028503102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008975108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013883486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025210192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031720751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020772014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08433652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601054333","doi":"","title":"Taking Notice of Equality: Judicial Notice and Expert Evidence in Trials Involving Equality Seeking Groups","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Doctrine; Scope (computer science); Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.14973435719339037,"score_gpt":0.41184897818333166,"score_spread":0.2621146209899413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1601054333","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10350915,0.07784274,0.1093596,0.4669081,0.008722733,0.0040962123,0.00014848879,0.000094335366,0.22931866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8563372,0.011093848,0.050774243,0.06763049,0.006270774,0.0028286169,0.00004304853,0.000037255933,0.0049845483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.42498043,0.5002334,0.02785664,0.011388549,0.0251058,0.0104351435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.15660068,0.80426973,0.019091113,0.009689568,0.0059580607,0.0043908074],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.45822272,0.0008994173,0.004239272,0.0042920657,0.01109183,0.02397488,0.005883076,0.061383396,0.0062174727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6933839,0.0018292721,0.0020078858,0.0035384377,0.053749353,0.037495244,0.021130612,0.028448038,0.0005316125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015827096,0.0003462911,0.0037209447,0.0019825385,0.0003263777,0.0026777377,0.023367943,0.0012399949,0.0004768531,0.8700954,0.007453075,0.08673007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002365214,0.0011613542,0.003302694,0.006889306,0.00040245563,0.0012166118,0.009228278,0.002378696,0.00091928,0.90652895,0.06532648,0.00028069658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029007543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005489202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45822272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00903445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023686316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66810787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603948267","doi":"","title":"Sexual Assault in Spousal Relationships, 'Continuous Consent', and the Law, Honest but Mistaken Judicial Beliefs","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Criminal law; Test (biology); Criminal code; Law; Sodomy; Social psychology; Reasonable person; Criminology; Political science; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Homosexuality; Medicine","score_opus":0.022312662104427228,"score_gpt":0.2857052451295585,"score_spread":0.2633925830251313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603948267","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30887124,0.038252626,0.022473505,0.42544043,0.0015670619,0.000098873796,0.00004968208,0.000109769964,0.20313682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98038095,0.0029892426,0.001376487,0.012073159,0.00044881913,0.000036097783,0.000006212924,0.000011376677,0.002677725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97534865,0.013563326,0.001309847,0.0021226557,0.0059287217,0.0017267612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94625294,0.043537572,0.0042318515,0.0022496372,0.003040798,0.0006871774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028402604,0.00024927102,0.00037182897,0.0014296542,0.008038718,0.011013602,0.002326537,0.0099951,0.00097098807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08652801,0.0005193947,0.00035400325,0.0007956852,0.06911355,0.008788225,0.003386074,0.011612934,0.00017539301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009154292,0.000019930996,0.0011128715,0.00004828569,0.0000042707225,0.0005520086,0.034807466,0.00015096222,0.0001934587,0.9463334,0.0041879583,0.012580151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033959812,0.00007692812,0.00476058,0.00095910946,0.00002557585,0.0013528856,0.037974674,0.0014342347,0.0011090795,0.85191816,0.1002633,0.000091606016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015872272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014745784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028402604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052203336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00649839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15020919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605347426","doi":"","title":"'Introduction' in Elizabeth Sheehy, Ed, Adding Feminism to Law: The Contributions of Justice Claire L’Heureux-Dubé","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Theme (computing); Law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Democracy; Feminism; Grassroots; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.011098145159308983,"score_gpt":0.3059937623750687,"score_spread":0.29489561721575974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605347426","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005800288,0.29938227,0.0016715411,0.38383225,0.101389356,0.0000986664,0.0005469631,0.00018414388,0.21231474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011599943,0.211601,0.0021720445,0.21763143,0.045257293,0.00022584652,0.0006534245,0.0002973033,0.51056176],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978822,0.00055928994,0.000072856375,0.0002477389,0.0009994758,0.0002385233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805224,0.0009575431,0.00008673418,0.000064658416,0.0006247318,0.00021409015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018785337,0.0010769397,0.000726535,0.0016322947,0.0049273805,0.006798021,0.0021203454,0.0061442037,0.032508727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050522382,0.00058677205,0.0006552325,0.0021383872,0.0043145465,0.0066626826,0.0031965082,0.007863683,0.012323052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004541967,0.00000703983,0.000069810805,0.00015871684,0.000001377335,0.00004185292,0.0012450096,0.00001615594,0.00002582384,0.017565396,0.95916766,0.021696484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.2568325e-7,0.0000026352868,0.00014157871,0.00032089624,5.9249044e-7,0.000047669368,0.00086127716,0.000005942574,0.000008750618,0.002090797,0.9965166,0.000002366382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03780693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08956134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03780693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057186037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074298633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10875255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605688381","doi":"","title":"FAMILY OUTSIDE THE BOOK ON THE FAMILY","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Family law; Law; Civil code; Code (set theory); Political science; Creativity; Civil law (Civil law); Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; Public law; Programming language","score_opus":0.022517523879209835,"score_gpt":0.29180815252956827,"score_spread":0.2692906286503584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605688381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002422584,0.07122684,0.0013202404,0.06276905,0.008207392,0.000026158465,0.0004961484,0.000116846895,0.8534148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07770309,0.022935651,0.0006812616,0.024698218,0.001792834,0.00004007847,0.00029513275,0.00014127928,0.8717123],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992415,0.00019223132,0.000014463042,0.0000905748,0.00026768638,0.00019364867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988668,0.0002197189,0.0000341527,0.00009706215,0.00059763395,0.0001846098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057888374,0.00062853325,0.00037103918,0.0010243396,0.008309725,0.0041042147,0.00076991523,0.0022666643,0.03817324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020422186,0.00020749318,0.0002895951,0.0011557791,0.0052504768,0.0026854787,0.0009320239,0.002808677,0.0063451147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010276546,0.0000071619625,0.00027288604,0.000038473616,0.000002822756,0.00011017867,0.0030561073,0.000057982114,0.000076424214,0.14404894,0.827376,0.0249427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.356183e-7,0.000002158912,0.00060294155,0.00013494083,0.0000013294786,0.00005404409,0.00078325626,0.000017411165,0.000021757336,0.0035664965,0.9948102,0.0000044083404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7617942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8589549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7617942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018084608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018448483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47921723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606274289","doi":"10.29173/mlj776","title":"Ivan Rand's Ancient Constitutionalism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reactionary; Constitutionalism; Economic Justice; Nationalism; Law; Political science; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.029376311100441938,"score_gpt":0.30086656386384164,"score_spread":0.2714902527633997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606274289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053253155,0.012950134,0.0039214995,0.10507276,0.0026480083,0.000031348125,0.0001096522,0.000085221654,0.86985606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34719306,0.0051979837,0.0048174597,0.08590507,0.0021228625,0.00013899468,0.000098139244,0.00014593339,0.5543806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99664295,0.0012659912,0.000079359546,0.00073583313,0.0009436038,0.00033224944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998428,0.0006826335,0.0000969912,0.0002879724,0.0003666482,0.00013766812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002510784,0.00042048865,0.0003175112,0.00082100596,0.0072897538,0.008242188,0.000921932,0.00444308,0.007095589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007732936,0.00025765414,0.00022779664,0.00058207806,0.016356591,0.003524981,0.0027881372,0.009213696,0.001297269],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038884077,0.000003129111,0.00006161421,0.0000082313045,0.0000013743012,0.000017394805,0.0007742933,0.00003124169,0.000020391702,0.95629215,0.038816854,0.003969423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005474254,0.0000057933066,0.0002850905,0.00017407889,0.0000034120844,0.00008013469,0.000709887,0.00008826206,0.00014978743,0.20477001,0.7937162,0.000011802802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038587175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059354287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038587175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062813363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005094443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076725185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607856959","doi":"10.7202/1007865ar","title":"La souffrance : injonction religieuse versus expression politique","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Anthropologie et Sociétés","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.24344773640232595,"score_gpt":0.5717899886131406,"score_spread":0.3283422522108146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607856959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4659889,0.006015514,0.0113735115,0.022919567,0.00032995557,0.000058571364,0.00008722906,0.00003593597,0.49319082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99351233,0.0008242681,0.00032664635,0.0005956191,0.00007179809,0.000017119257,0.000013929118,0.000013477536,0.0046248543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996424,0.002121253,0.00013576043,0.00021298049,0.00069857866,0.000407339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99577206,0.0019821324,0.0012136388,0.00048305842,0.00032886822,0.00022026863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022443112,0.00026888604,0.00023213174,0.00091785204,0.0025438622,0.0063044066,0.0005563508,0.001416479,0.0048038675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055260146,0.00016429932,0.0002182171,0.0010510149,0.025087869,0.0030943307,0.0031325417,0.002614936,0.00031635395],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006151379,0.00004758043,0.006278085,0.0001225224,0.00001626109,0.000276936,0.27192447,0.000086419874,0.0013445839,0.7002061,0.0011762818,0.018459212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006333644,0.0003029426,0.07342784,0.001723377,0.00009708257,0.0017392723,0.3884276,0.00092296675,0.0041176034,0.2559165,0.27315515,0.000106363936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005731279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047589904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063044066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022811475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012307967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016550958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608073562","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1245","title":"Looking Backward, Looking Forward: The Supreme Court of Canada’s Decision in R. v. Ipeelee","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Proportionality (law); Prison; High Court; Charter; Legislation; Parliament; Economic Justice; Representation (politics); Politics","score_opus":0.03336093205677299,"score_gpt":0.3157383767015545,"score_spread":0.28237744464478154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608073562","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027828619,0.007955161,0.0031447734,0.722316,0.0054011247,0.00019861916,0.0008585804,0.00022636646,0.23207071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32042578,0.0046339124,0.00441031,0.45776865,0.0013961113,0.00015758825,0.0004830499,0.0002748215,0.21044974],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9787364,0.0017899026,0.00055801554,0.0021877892,0.008099176,0.008628624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913344,0.0017223832,0.0001828952,0.0002082672,0.004720039,0.001831995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009140615,0.00077626633,0.000846723,0.0014407865,0.039246354,0.01947593,0.005850601,0.02330652,0.0051338384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02182081,0.0014427279,0.0016705943,0.001995819,0.010784166,0.0046259863,0.0038528573,0.038413607,0.0008192776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077546814,0.000049051097,0.0029910451,0.00011927496,0.000060849314,0.0020427709,0.010571128,0.00062266894,0.0010367197,0.44040176,0.51958317,0.022444049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013543127,0.00007603878,0.011812245,0.0008538795,0.0002532396,0.0004502215,0.013059006,0.001930817,0.0024110598,0.042989165,0.9254163,0.00061258767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99109226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99600935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.146394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.146394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2963491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99006194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1609483509","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1187","title":"Section 1, Constitutional Reasoning and Cultural Difference: Assessing the Impacts of Alberta v. Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Charter; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Constitutionalism; Irony; Political science; Constitutional law; Section (typography); Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Democracy","score_opus":0.031262043503530616,"score_gpt":0.3525673312348134,"score_spread":0.32130528773128275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1609483509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47852543,0.013511685,0.00060569,0.051028077,0.00039753498,0.00033131248,0.0007228808,0.000028653516,0.45484877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95653653,0.003181535,0.00048400578,0.011141395,0.00008302816,0.000064852975,0.00021405434,0.000012868994,0.02828181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838192,0.0020111473,0.00021818986,0.0006653825,0.009856164,0.003430074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887989,0.0054649743,0.0008439865,0.00028935692,0.0032475323,0.0013552388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056820717,0.0003775402,0.00040859237,0.002487994,0.017262658,0.008212773,0.003176514,0.0037353828,0.0049771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02336804,0.00042289935,0.0004049076,0.003572301,0.012613334,0.0020479134,0.0029528376,0.0042861234,0.0001931966],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031190916,0.00031224158,0.1096829,0.00045352138,0.0001314321,0.0025532022,0.032942995,0.0026043607,0.0010374374,0.7059566,0.086340785,0.057672586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022366947,0.00058308034,0.4456392,0.0017847636,0.0004982767,0.0005625205,0.09975419,0.0022086946,0.0027223725,0.08179728,0.36386248,0.00036343624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98377335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99452484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086652465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.086652465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13327734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62871057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1618705117","doi":"","title":"FEDERAL POWER AND FEDERAL DUTY: RECONCILING SECTIONS 91(24) AND 35(1) OF THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Parliament; Treaty; Law; Political science; Legislature; Power (physics); Duty; Treaty of Waitangi; Politics","score_opus":0.036240484362927025,"score_gpt":0.26672059517143726,"score_spread":0.23048011080851022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1618705117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03416396,0.01217332,0.004026126,0.13837922,0.0017053855,0.00011379814,0.00036092545,0.00007321556,0.809004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8731172,0.006567801,0.004239286,0.035583064,0.0005974219,0.00010504267,0.000187829,0.00008416896,0.0795182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.986961,0.0019172489,0.0001836823,0.00071720325,0.004486376,0.0057345023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99658304,0.0010185945,0.00013428381,0.0001917947,0.001454373,0.0006179603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066524064,0.0003800713,0.00045948412,0.0029698915,0.02670658,0.011045705,0.0022321034,0.0056773755,0.0048121065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013007561,0.00044978724,0.00046619234,0.0035092998,0.020457435,0.0040652235,0.004453586,0.005609212,0.0003850754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006440631,0.0000044514345,0.0003574314,0.000011212003,0.000002863906,0.000054702254,0.0036506203,0.00013442496,0.00004061654,0.9751017,0.016457343,0.004178206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043421733,0.000015626056,0.008000228,0.0005010355,0.000060543163,0.00008178501,0.010591779,0.0007328431,0.00031445303,0.2316185,0.7479451,0.00009464833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9835544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9931437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14164044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14164044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2647006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1628859977","doi":"","title":"Labour Rights as Human Rights: Turning Slogans into Legal Claims","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Fundamental rights; Law; Humanities; Charter; International human rights law; Politics; Context (archaeology); Social rights; Sociology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.014060566970134959,"score_gpt":0.2939328939781385,"score_spread":0.2798723270080035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1628859977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03213824,0.00735579,0.03110303,0.12700613,0.0008423612,0.00005193075,0.00008252177,0.000075219585,0.8013449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9568683,0.0032364228,0.0061910693,0.007668115,0.0007755212,0.00013456838,0.0000482708,0.00008907533,0.024988545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882615,0.0068113892,0.00031233937,0.0007450115,0.0024003463,0.001469388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989929,0.0073342156,0.00068985065,0.00079283555,0.0008458057,0.0004082419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011530068,0.00069048355,0.00064047624,0.003170093,0.009165131,0.017560776,0.0018796498,0.0061417874,0.005957007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017555889,0.0005005498,0.00060318486,0.0029133735,0.14062202,0.017475154,0.009156159,0.008499757,0.0006267262],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012320439,0.0000016187438,0.000030862288,0.0000061593623,5.026006e-7,0.000011792317,0.0025676568,0.000032072032,0.00001304437,0.99642855,0.0002879326,0.0006185053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038752587,0.000003461679,0.00015948093,0.00009451302,0.0000020333634,0.000015759519,0.004015605,0.00016286325,0.000054772605,0.9769463,0.018535506,0.0000058097626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031284023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022944236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031284023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011683024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0078083226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08476663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1637994529","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1293508","title":"Breaking the Law's Grip on Equality: A New Paradigm for Section 15","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04042182875429428,"score_gpt":0.3310574466077369,"score_spread":0.2906356178534426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1637994529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013754298,0.002964324,0.02182619,0.28008872,0.0033823051,0.00008694936,0.00012388876,0.00012561143,0.6776476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7072735,0.0020275177,0.013262893,0.17927986,0.005200014,0.0005738333,0.00010790382,0.0003096177,0.09196482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826226,0.00659354,0.0005560918,0.002517581,0.004235339,0.0034749077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98526114,0.00773414,0.0010047931,0.0020156188,0.0019482892,0.0020359736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021961505,0.0006356103,0.0015330351,0.0015139572,0.013552011,0.020181993,0.0040147486,0.019027086,0.018593948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027903743,0.00063224084,0.0012877715,0.0011832634,0.060099572,0.02177679,0.0129893245,0.023408832,0.001930136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003918539,0.000008361821,0.000053132146,0.000006779389,0.0000018442979,0.000008006194,0.0006132231,0.00002199507,0.00001954354,0.99199206,0.005624521,0.0016465334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016912776,0.000017087415,0.0001697932,0.0001095474,0.0000072714515,0.000024855834,0.00086424197,0.00014609433,0.0001028869,0.9351965,0.06332676,0.000018018363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017592847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018128231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021961505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0091273235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028848896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116144955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1641423233","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1266","title":"The Re-emergence of a Clash of Rights: A Critical Analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada’s Decision in R. v. S. (N.)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Witness; Economic Justice; Supreme Court Decisions; Sociology","score_opus":0.03238244692011854,"score_gpt":0.3345856106037711,"score_spread":0.3022031636836526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1641423233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21568024,0.04126336,0.0031854995,0.30332574,0.0017649401,0.00024101921,0.0002008802,0.000043539116,0.4342948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9359029,0.0053052013,0.0008164354,0.03376133,0.00032968854,0.00005718953,0.00003921402,0.00004679797,0.023741325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98347026,0.004572165,0.00028669633,0.0013702767,0.004651669,0.005648954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826288,0.010148242,0.0006558605,0.00034431508,0.0050677597,0.0011550502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018530974,0.0005519197,0.0009768622,0.004170793,0.05032316,0.019747786,0.004674105,0.015261536,0.0029957315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025174875,0.0008024261,0.0008375495,0.004177048,0.04364379,0.0068813427,0.005155398,0.01770164,0.0002538539],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034315097,0.000025193385,0.0013167581,0.00013125337,0.000031194264,0.0020269456,0.15234202,0.00024620804,0.0003054501,0.79463416,0.0381645,0.01074201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000617396,0.00005400777,0.010178441,0.0016523013,0.00014571281,0.0005063149,0.27883378,0.0007508823,0.0012667752,0.12982072,0.5764817,0.000247606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93801624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9671596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1194702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1194702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1253193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86682105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1648716606","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1098","title":"The Federal Principle and the 2005 Balance of Powers in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); Political science; Psychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.015620089035533857,"score_gpt":0.28521681583314906,"score_spread":0.2695967267976152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1648716606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043133754,0.060530555,0.0019996327,0.067519866,0.0010022598,0.00012022787,0.0011244561,0.00003880187,0.8245305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81120336,0.025052417,0.0021953357,0.021276219,0.0003365308,0.00010886365,0.00043799815,0.000038984737,0.13935027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99374807,0.00052869035,0.00015077743,0.00050563004,0.0028530988,0.002213774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99733967,0.0005694585,0.00015346367,0.0000859103,0.001525391,0.00032612708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027898054,0.00034259036,0.00046519932,0.0030906056,0.013793237,0.009888568,0.0017500651,0.0043983795,0.0070134555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007872512,0.0005224369,0.00042805113,0.004969976,0.0074927304,0.0021045343,0.001605761,0.003804169,0.00042615365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001596084,0.000006904934,0.0008825791,0.000063798696,0.000011704293,0.00010116937,0.0013597517,0.0004581492,0.00006278988,0.95405364,0.033171006,0.009812576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000603665,0.000022307742,0.016427536,0.00062698836,0.00008755007,0.00012828995,0.0029025995,0.001016764,0.00035049766,0.15226395,0.82602257,0.00009045576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99105775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13810903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13810903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1863714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1662027952","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1070","title":"What is Equality?: The Winding Course of Judicial Interpretation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Jurisprudence; Section (typography); Law; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Plaintiff; Element (criminal law); Charter; Political science; Judicial interpretation; Government (linguistics); Constitutional law; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.060244816806279536,"score_gpt":0.3895969499465125,"score_spread":0.329352133140233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1662027952","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025493825,0.096490435,0.008833465,0.72100365,0.0064276806,0.00004002921,0.00006314991,0.000047548918,0.14160024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79681236,0.028614115,0.0059374,0.1428923,0.012807099,0.00007883151,0.00007555745,0.00007172291,0.012710681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9429956,0.03420483,0.0018019229,0.0035024972,0.012902441,0.0045927432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9546044,0.035226744,0.0018055425,0.0017413091,0.0055997735,0.0010223228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030536056,0.00031109178,0.0010130295,0.0034559728,0.010377946,0.019566003,0.0026880149,0.009145959,0.0018026636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054876752,0.00044844556,0.00056101946,0.0025095793,0.053954244,0.012431041,0.0054510217,0.01061673,0.00031447905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011135625,0.000010423726,0.00032124214,0.00005910052,0.000009466106,0.00015619547,0.005813583,0.00009696399,0.00007127252,0.93933433,0.030364307,0.023752041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020646043,0.000018330515,0.0011035439,0.0006055837,0.0000119419265,0.00012950662,0.009501166,0.00026800303,0.00022903673,0.80730927,0.18076418,0.000038770297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022806967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027646888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030536056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013391325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014093246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16149205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W166696703","doi":"","title":"Divorcing Children: Children’s Experience of Their Parent’s Divorce","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed Central","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Meaning (existential); Perspective (graphical); Strict constructionism; Principal (computer security); Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01816153057686294,"score_gpt":0.24821450475698578,"score_spread":0.23005297418012283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W166696703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98564327,0.0039862585,0.00021659896,0.0027357535,0.000088052264,0.000027598775,0.00013320243,0.000022671822,0.007146597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99197525,0.004391018,0.0002964186,0.0005622071,0.000021235348,0.00005017649,0.000093346105,0.000019782461,0.0025905364],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706995,0.0011985056,0.00015593781,0.00018965644,0.00061811035,0.0007678831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961033,0.0017178642,0.00080395327,0.00014779068,0.00048371428,0.00074337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037221522,0.0005229062,0.0011326002,0.0013766933,0.009788824,0.0053401273,0.0016750459,0.0017922454,0.0034625004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008929392,0.0010181003,0.00073026255,0.0021682964,0.0063703284,0.0032774939,0.0060638245,0.005677949,0.0003993347],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003008446,0.000024423462,0.008775353,0.000074039286,0.000011328875,0.0017872251,0.9831503,0.000018230641,0.00027326084,0.0009088867,0.00081886526,0.0041280547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053113176,0.00005835108,0.015526442,0.00012392382,0.000018159137,0.0020154386,0.967443,0.000018407602,0.00015913288,0.00018202093,0.014420906,0.000028973118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07246879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10652041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07246879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049924543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036897615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14409393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1681414090","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.23848","title":"LESSONS TO BE LEARNED: THE DECISION OF THE SOCIAL BENEFITS TRIBUNAL IN TRANCHEMONTAGNE V. ONTARIO (DIRECTOR, DISABILITY SUPPORT PROGRAM)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Program director; Psychology; Political science; Management; Medical education; Medicine; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.07690490613691789,"score_gpt":0.4254042561545593,"score_spread":0.34849935001764143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1681414090","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1900631,0.0074019474,0.00039255922,0.6880218,0.001958926,0.00007027119,0.00006988844,0.000015139435,0.112006344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87815076,0.0026707363,0.0002616508,0.083130434,0.00040359443,0.00004248954,0.000024456813,0.00002167998,0.035294224],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992942,0.002554647,0.00016128845,0.0003322554,0.001512199,0.002497633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950376,0.0027382404,0.00028612113,0.00009342663,0.0007397294,0.0011048476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070860377,0.0003218287,0.00033124862,0.00082986004,0.047335308,0.010019154,0.002245908,0.010975016,0.002552789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009079415,0.00035552893,0.00031072393,0.0011497418,0.044812113,0.004388328,0.0042970697,0.009932417,0.0001956413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004068705,0.000039281837,0.0031586431,0.00012547587,0.000008749312,0.0019602175,0.5984045,0.000113379945,0.00052201154,0.26552352,0.11954075,0.010562693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020127807,0.000017799579,0.00542894,0.00031392422,0.000011343313,0.00020834558,0.5702203,0.000109644694,0.00038599386,0.012165912,0.4110526,0.000065119195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9386791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9728223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11049175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11049175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.104448706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8016775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1690183032","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1283","title":"2013: Constitutional Cases in Review","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Constitution; Economic Justice; High Court; Government (linguistics); Constitutional right","score_opus":0.06678473625502294,"score_gpt":0.36131496886841874,"score_spread":0.2945302326133958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1690183032","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002597341,0.68667156,0.00058457005,0.07558057,0.008977433,0.00028485962,0.001220326,0.000104908686,0.22397837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08037666,0.61286646,0.0013290986,0.22921862,0.0068554473,0.0007209574,0.0012857261,0.00013244896,0.06721459],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98829067,0.0014394216,0.000740224,0.0008733173,0.0060651805,0.0025912207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824171,0.007905695,0.0010049171,0.00066522934,0.0070069134,0.0010002025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011175923,0.00082262384,0.0013787387,0.011592454,0.010778471,0.010914618,0.0037767317,0.0081545785,0.008149917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032688692,0.0008757072,0.0011458255,0.016513154,0.011625287,0.003971687,0.0033802283,0.0060438113,0.0014619137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025423828,0.000036341415,0.0005409209,0.0030262284,0.000042620122,0.0005117467,0.0013442036,0.0003765848,0.00021934828,0.344771,0.5967577,0.052347902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000115450675,0.0000063009347,0.0015389153,0.0049292934,0.000032799067,0.0000873843,0.00074594154,0.000033213368,0.00007962315,0.005098689,0.98740757,0.00002877792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83284664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87104106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83284664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07904268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14993612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5734975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1694764544","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1153","title":"Due Process, Collective Bargaining and Section 2(d) of the Charter: A Comment on B.C. Health Services","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Collective bargaining; Supreme court; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Freedom of association; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Human rights; History","score_opus":0.04399825640918045,"score_gpt":0.33035989872541344,"score_spread":0.28636164231623296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1694764544","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004635672,0.010119397,0.002088174,0.92236865,0.011838951,0.00014077779,0.0004553759,0.000095843294,0.04825711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03515343,0.0023820505,0.0012921487,0.9285381,0.005337645,0.00025383398,0.0000925006,0.00009406765,0.026856257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95833683,0.009150911,0.0021483293,0.00648163,0.013226219,0.010656083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9737462,0.019080713,0.0009273503,0.000722709,0.0038795604,0.0016434942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03182021,0.0022092946,0.0029436648,0.0016604894,0.037066925,0.018684128,0.012662362,0.13102308,0.0049905144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046093166,0.0022415174,0.0057080477,0.0031173266,0.034698695,0.008121347,0.006302459,0.09368415,0.0016238303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006977684,0.000052086147,0.00049776153,0.00012983214,0.00003040471,0.0006497724,0.006822869,0.0003610702,0.00039125385,0.58760977,0.39972514,0.0036603278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034754435,0.00014762593,0.003382095,0.0013859158,0.00014014129,0.00032348576,0.0060846945,0.0017417336,0.00095601735,0.12898496,0.85594475,0.0005610256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83278805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8568979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16721195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0725366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09477706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5262923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1698388006","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1961111","title":"End-of-Life Decision-Making in Canada: The Report by the Royal Society of Canada Expert Panel on End-of-Life Decision-Making","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; End-of-life care; Assisted suicide; Palliative care; Place of death; Making-of; Law; Political science; Medicine; Nursing; Management","score_opus":0.03388545239729944,"score_gpt":0.2960244792366749,"score_spread":0.26213902683937546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1698388006","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11298914,0.11932988,0.007277438,0.6371907,0.0060740556,0.0014783996,0.016190037,0.0002848004,0.09918558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77651906,0.086850114,0.027677981,0.06435632,0.0010243127,0.0010703383,0.011979924,0.0005492985,0.029972712],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9327459,0.011363815,0.006855669,0.0024246315,0.03642489,0.01018514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7612926,0.05966527,0.009372795,0.003346896,0.13947083,0.026851716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08060204,0.0012096375,0.002656567,0.0065005817,0.014453291,0.014849015,0.010101037,0.0070454176,0.004760723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13059987,0.0015683762,0.0030802754,0.013608926,0.0068761115,0.0037158555,0.0062448415,0.01212789,0.00060775666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007443528,0.0003518363,0.057906963,0.004545096,0.0007048231,0.00066829234,0.02020705,0.007795267,0.00043822144,0.034902208,0.66036296,0.2113729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045120073,0.00012636805,0.19300143,0.024770956,0.00079567987,0.00038173934,0.04213709,0.007156347,0.0017428191,0.016780986,0.7112795,0.0013758142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99488765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99781644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.793212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20678802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.602262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9200135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1704118755","doi":"","title":"Equality Rights And Social Benefit Programs","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Statute; Petitioner; Law; Statutory law; Political science; Premise; Discretion; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0884142195885654,"score_gpt":0.350251721995125,"score_spread":0.2618375024065596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1704118755","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035564918,0.0020266194,0.0101423105,0.043685835,0.00018600133,0.000090206544,0.00013470904,0.000035730205,0.9081337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93000096,0.00074896717,0.0029373616,0.014358649,0.00025894525,0.00023690063,0.0000682678,0.000022590442,0.05136734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812577,0.007217407,0.00043155055,0.0020109313,0.0046472554,0.0044351234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955279,0.0021494182,0.0003491195,0.00070871576,0.0007881813,0.00047660785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010696421,0.00036801136,0.0005690611,0.0010818853,0.008204481,0.0070919814,0.0015000533,0.00675674,0.008734821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012572985,0.00034851555,0.00048061207,0.0010893921,0.03228532,0.0045266286,0.0069784056,0.0056907185,0.0005680299],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002273306,0.0000034768666,0.000086719556,0.0000043737627,0.0000013775432,0.000011242767,0.0002706537,0.000046966226,0.000015413907,0.9973997,0.00068405253,0.0014737354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046057696,0.00003613311,0.0019600207,0.00014299047,0.000017166212,0.000065749555,0.00088295277,0.00052117615,0.00029200307,0.8945523,0.10146162,0.000021780072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.094169244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10192849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094169244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012178416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016169325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18724227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W171361639","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1474","title":"Latimer: Something Ominous is Happening in the World of Disabled People","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Supreme court; Punishment (psychology); Setback; Sentence; Law; Homicide; Legislation; Criminology; Happening; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Social psychology; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.04100457576549173,"score_gpt":0.3296731943426741,"score_spread":0.2886686185771824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W171361639","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.123060934,0.017201735,0.00093108404,0.48179954,0.0024065266,0.000021032547,0.000048772803,0.00004744565,0.37448305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7795955,0.009073666,0.0005115225,0.121534474,0.0015828641,0.00006481089,0.000022518649,0.00004924495,0.08756545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964677,0.0016366895,0.00011455126,0.00024360651,0.00064916833,0.0008882451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969825,0.0016074574,0.00051126437,0.00017936357,0.00020834534,0.00051100185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002461816,0.0002363302,0.0002902657,0.0007966233,0.023978645,0.008201462,0.0007522069,0.0066570775,0.0054972693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062233475,0.00019087904,0.00024930097,0.0009376893,0.024949973,0.007622072,0.0068902546,0.0058338316,0.00075559353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019838042,0.000030543575,0.004067755,0.00014485455,0.000005727638,0.002424488,0.3176414,0.000033779714,0.00040622905,0.5307124,0.104090564,0.04042242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005296338,0.000043382133,0.0055952296,0.00053930894,0.000009640304,0.0021019604,0.23141034,0.000025159618,0.00021594761,0.050578598,0.7094328,0.00004228551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03807338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06480774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03807338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033134401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063765994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07570356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1716680343","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1026","title":"The Court's Exercise of Plenary Power: Rewriting the Two-Row Wampum","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Doctrine; Political science; High Court; Sovereignty; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04757977348942157,"score_gpt":0.32391248267403233,"score_spread":0.2763327091846108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1716680343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018159583,0.035566643,0.0057687047,0.31225267,0.0042238147,0.00011738884,0.0002091523,0.00010459515,0.6235974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58772194,0.009749822,0.0032969054,0.15230797,0.0033110282,0.00043165497,0.00008658524,0.0002062135,0.24288778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99261343,0.0027253008,0.00030074886,0.0009418869,0.0017997463,0.0016188443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944383,0.003979094,0.00021840855,0.00031041907,0.0007538527,0.00030006212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009030869,0.0004753597,0.0006921125,0.001192333,0.0141902445,0.013260067,0.0025789875,0.02073384,0.006801782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023313314,0.00088938186,0.00078726746,0.0011922647,0.01511886,0.007017096,0.003821202,0.01675836,0.0017426801],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000126429,0.000011512436,0.00011882555,0.0000341983,0.0000058397686,0.00019532703,0.0018621188,0.00007749312,0.00007303517,0.9244847,0.06873958,0.004384775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000640073,0.00003536599,0.0011497962,0.0006256463,0.00005391271,0.00017826752,0.003655472,0.0005838793,0.0004105519,0.4003779,0.5928036,0.00006166239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.071091965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14958976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92890805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010384168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013119723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14135629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1720261768","doi":"","title":"Graham Swift and the Ethical Self","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in literature and language","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Swift; Modernity; Postmodernism; Obligation; Utopia; Meaning (existential); Aesthetics; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02986949201529906,"score_gpt":0.34630621510102355,"score_spread":0.3164367230857245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1720261768","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010944672,0.065216,0.0033450203,0.6499246,0.0038631018,0.000033049808,0.000052341264,0.00005662723,0.2665646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6304316,0.038333695,0.007807571,0.13277815,0.004820736,0.00022755304,0.000055946322,0.00020743467,0.1853374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99649495,0.0018796237,0.00008657003,0.00032801248,0.00086176087,0.00034907708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966133,0.002191183,0.00024944035,0.00015973746,0.00040075698,0.00038556397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031619605,0.0005295067,0.00045157294,0.0014069363,0.007917824,0.0063305805,0.0009098735,0.0063639744,0.0030177468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005459697,0.0003803036,0.00024578345,0.0013956047,0.039927498,0.008052434,0.0034790374,0.009035577,0.00071426074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005557323,0.0000065530626,0.00006429377,0.000021688626,0.0000011063672,0.00008096155,0.0042102584,0.00007502545,0.00001842657,0.9354949,0.055608295,0.0044129337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008862399,0.000008268436,0.00019768286,0.00019438445,0.0000019155611,0.00017306992,0.0029752369,0.00013884508,0.000053590124,0.4843497,0.51188076,0.000017713994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021511354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02612036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021511354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008949671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00826515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06493467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1724172845","doi":"10.1111/heyj.12247","title":"A (Reconstructed) New Natural Law Account of Sexuate Selfhood and Rape's Harm","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Heythrop Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Citation; Library science; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.05382590675346862,"score_gpt":0.3285243597631367,"score_spread":0.2746984530096681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1724172845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04843807,0.002413545,0.032363325,0.12853383,0.0013286062,0.00007394496,0.00030355967,0.00007278155,0.7864724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92660594,0.0012138658,0.003473786,0.009486523,0.0006921671,0.00008303649,0.00008044443,0.00004464283,0.058319535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881697,0.00044919952,0.00005142272,0.00018030366,0.0002914143,0.00021080681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977652,0.0011671892,0.00015852632,0.0004620395,0.0003152059,0.00013187088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024887472,0.0002663359,0.000324728,0.0012428884,0.0035225179,0.0049442286,0.0017822353,0.0053771897,0.014184284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005075407,0.00023317497,0.00053816766,0.00073636963,0.026443392,0.008956238,0.0027905938,0.0059772073,0.0009386301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033530482,0.000006629255,0.00011555822,0.000005062237,9.845185e-7,0.00005562477,0.0010781144,0.000046179026,0.000017808916,0.99665326,0.0010812707,0.00093623856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006862473,0.0000054633415,0.0003758848,0.000035246427,0.0000052862306,0.00023851416,0.0013327632,0.00040560018,0.00007108413,0.9706826,0.026833596,0.000007195844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009065754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009081612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014184284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028576222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033373274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047451198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1731472568","doi":"","title":"Treaty Lands and Crown Obligations: The \"Tracts Taken Up\" Provision","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Scholarship","score_opus":0.0198373508236737,"score_gpt":0.3049903042489493,"score_spread":0.2851529534252756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1731472568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06285232,0.0030474695,0.008834938,0.020141613,0.00030937276,0.00011935279,0.00021297704,0.00007062402,0.9044114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8964937,0.0014879496,0.0031043137,0.009841817,0.00020549023,0.00012601394,0.00012118132,0.00006373906,0.088555746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98869145,0.0017224534,0.0002829199,0.0009421849,0.0047282306,0.0036328293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961902,0.0013802135,0.00030335333,0.00036497752,0.001285374,0.00047591532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035950488,0.00054165034,0.0004997075,0.0013412628,0.014681033,0.011952485,0.00222648,0.0067878,0.006674983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010031057,0.00054580625,0.0006241362,0.0017389836,0.026071098,0.00537014,0.005327503,0.007473875,0.0005044417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005601625,0.0000075825055,0.0005666826,0.000016840726,0.000004647716,0.00010675109,0.0040661916,0.00021342165,0.00011443483,0.98828584,0.0036280279,0.0029840241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006804143,0.00007143367,0.017202867,0.0008701732,0.0001219215,0.0003402562,0.016360957,0.0018828401,0.0013004153,0.40435797,0.55723417,0.00018897784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8312559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88983214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16874409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0430974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08244121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3394757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1735971894","doi":"","title":"LEAF and the Supreme Court of Canada Appeal of Health Services and Support-Facilities Subsector Bargaining Assn. v. British Columbia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Supreme court; Ethnology; Law; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.01847224957400527,"score_gpt":0.23239943573549904,"score_spread":0.21392718616149375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1735971894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033045176,0.008755269,0.0008555859,0.12758192,0.0025720764,0.00024243242,0.0021200485,0.000118492666,0.82470906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24566483,0.003448369,0.000947361,0.08141812,0.0004360026,0.0002012353,0.00055738864,0.00009817317,0.6672285],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99254096,0.00049887167,0.00016022929,0.0006304739,0.0028226604,0.0033468413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950622,0.0012188004,0.00011513588,0.00016534723,0.0025621108,0.0008763785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003081866,0.0006045405,0.0006679594,0.0013596248,0.029358258,0.010618157,0.002449932,0.011726898,0.019141397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009347854,0.0008684497,0.00077722967,0.0020836222,0.0040283073,0.0016816051,0.0024740337,0.010087586,0.002056522],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011604834,0.000045854147,0.00544864,0.0001440212,0.000048738922,0.0009504749,0.0035524187,0.000606119,0.00070063234,0.447067,0.52206826,0.01925183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008029738,0.00003231844,0.012023979,0.00044554914,0.000131534,0.00011881452,0.0051133693,0.0010951262,0.0006990193,0.018431751,0.9616648,0.00016345258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9854359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99533695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08433642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08433642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17636906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6119064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W176171999","doi":"10.29173/alr393","title":"Child Representation in Alberta: Role and Responsibilities of Counsel for the Child in Family Proceedings","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Guardian; Law; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Best interests; Legal guardian; Action (physics); Political science; Family law; Representation (politics); Professional conduct; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.045978180188612265,"score_gpt":0.3401539981842174,"score_spread":0.2941758179956051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W176171999","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14125364,0.45160905,0.00049401156,0.045167565,0.0009824095,0.0001157934,0.0001405313,0.00004537602,0.36019164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71369046,0.23370916,0.0010385921,0.011001899,0.00040118463,0.000055367254,0.0001401499,0.000023196684,0.039940063],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928543,0.0023664606,0.00021799724,0.00026360992,0.0029323702,0.0013651967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933989,0.002562786,0.00069344323,0.00013788174,0.0021495346,0.0010574341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069429143,0.00019928135,0.0003182883,0.0023536426,0.006316902,0.0041739335,0.0021537605,0.0022901075,0.0028489437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0098045105,0.00028348173,0.00023362985,0.0036087912,0.005269271,0.00072174467,0.002090955,0.0014738139,0.00024594614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114159404,0.00020979125,0.0411427,0.002673984,0.000082705665,0.005718203,0.07017152,0.0011414628,0.0010354692,0.18748724,0.09347437,0.5967484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051392504,0.00013397787,0.14160311,0.006740683,0.00015128075,0.0029113074,0.06636571,0.00017767372,0.0005288235,0.0065105455,0.77472454,0.00010092581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9211495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97613186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07885051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04391759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11262377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3186459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1765200905","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1009","title":"Charter and Context: The Facts For Which We Need Evidence, and the Mysterious Other Ones","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Context (archaeology); Political science; History; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.08167069439336848,"score_gpt":0.34771969685595805,"score_spread":0.26604900246258956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1765200905","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00995816,0.14933616,0.021535825,0.7399614,0.008507732,0.00007444595,0.0006678041,0.000081807724,0.06987662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6817945,0.17924649,0.023778474,0.086525284,0.01811804,0.0003152773,0.0007156041,0.00020269272,0.009303658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858014,0.008598815,0.00077474996,0.0014427949,0.0026043502,0.00077780714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9401241,0.038507804,0.0053000823,0.008576325,0.0058190953,0.0016726173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019117856,0.0008678334,0.0015229152,0.004251536,0.0066998354,0.01593804,0.003932898,0.0086753415,0.010170402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08059691,0.0005447784,0.00056717865,0.00583039,0.06788028,0.060265124,0.0077451593,0.012807202,0.0012259346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004724402,0.000027993372,0.0013354706,0.0008687226,0.000030392368,0.00022930746,0.0046430095,0.00023103476,0.00006198542,0.91640246,0.03796597,0.038156413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012825465,0.00001528151,0.0011922193,0.0026915742,0.00002042296,0.00022962445,0.011917886,0.00024996436,0.00008864361,0.8084868,0.17505641,0.000038206454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013014622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017227488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019117856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043133055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00927287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10110611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W176921812","doi":"","title":"Conversations about Families in Canadian Courts and Legislatures: Are there \"Lessons\" for the United States?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hofstra law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05314811017678399,"score_gpt":0.34363492783819866,"score_spread":0.29048681766141465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W176921812","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06288919,0.08791492,0.00046442103,0.76228124,0.002514662,0.00007510394,0.00073039817,0.00003936004,0.08309068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7376489,0.055380777,0.0006662099,0.18949553,0.0008582198,0.00012126934,0.00029858155,0.00005747302,0.015473042],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97662306,0.0067587043,0.0006128888,0.0012819212,0.006946712,0.0077767954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9242745,0.031401977,0.0024127148,0.0008496154,0.02850436,0.012556843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02551288,0.00050417904,0.00097069616,0.0065366076,0.05830142,0.019560179,0.0051026572,0.012979712,0.008687543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068020195,0.00072576967,0.00081858115,0.009135513,0.02212921,0.007980656,0.0046672686,0.011677029,0.00037912352],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013534667,0.00013244824,0.022352736,0.0010367977,0.00017143444,0.000729805,0.18747698,0.00051786244,0.00028296423,0.1794686,0.50101256,0.106682405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005886604,0.000046424313,0.0631889,0.0044487696,0.00027614992,0.00015967379,0.38619134,0.00023200372,0.00039741874,0.016563226,0.52817285,0.00026436357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99724054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20175675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20175675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42369425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.925849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1774390520","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1030534","title":"The History and Future of the 'Legal Family' in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal history; Political science; History; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.0074656229943788534,"score_gpt":0.23409725845326199,"score_spread":0.22663163545888312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1774390520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43632582,0.050146893,0.0011085069,0.21122153,0.0015230622,0.00007846549,0.0009840205,0.00007207639,0.29853964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.951806,0.008323218,0.0003500925,0.0051267785,0.00011144666,0.000015912385,0.00008790869,0.000034328197,0.034144398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961085,0.0005093799,0.0000783412,0.0002984587,0.00073951983,0.0022657358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917972,0.0010868836,0.0004372251,0.0001465078,0.0026887176,0.003843525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023421505,0.00028261708,0.00062151783,0.002718753,0.04410059,0.0137189645,0.0031805825,0.004118141,0.015897041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008822614,0.00046152226,0.00041189088,0.00660076,0.018196268,0.0036401472,0.004750513,0.0058444943,0.00051309424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014482129,0.000113452326,0.01956987,0.00021553217,0.000035916753,0.0015390563,0.13836418,0.0009344994,0.00023589176,0.68732446,0.058328927,0.09319343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033649434,0.00004963417,0.056279447,0.00085151836,0.000043905726,0.000605017,0.1924605,0.00092478,0.0002524341,0.030654736,0.7176364,0.00020786475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99815255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24039774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24039774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38154587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.881031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W177593734","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1060","title":"Peering into the Bedrooms of the Province: An Examination of the Different Definitions of Spouse in the Family Law Act and the Ontario Works Act, 1997","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peering; Spouse; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.035919147945312375,"score_gpt":0.30085398466448343,"score_spread":0.26493483671917106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W177593734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69046694,0.005019446,0.00096286356,0.020106848,0.00014489841,0.00014844465,0.00019212822,0.000014408959,0.28294408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98571855,0.0012738437,0.00012756287,0.00048064595,0.000015291604,0.00004224734,0.00002696979,0.000008921642,0.0123059675],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915433,0.0029652005,0.00032901394,0.00037026673,0.0029879468,0.0018042659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927411,0.0028311913,0.0012509397,0.00028831742,0.0018571559,0.0010313243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004673868,0.00019431372,0.00028880572,0.0018877354,0.018463166,0.0062005017,0.0017845843,0.0014468555,0.004144775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0144724175,0.00037463827,0.00016722296,0.003558028,0.020838657,0.0032995215,0.0056270496,0.0015370906,0.00018823556],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027082928,0.000020239308,0.02160851,0.000115808274,0.000005877551,0.0005024099,0.8362092,0.00008572802,0.000153043,0.12190627,0.004887918,0.014477996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006908213,0.000016550874,0.072622515,0.0003084741,0.0000089199475,0.00009928289,0.81286067,0.000090457,0.00010643498,0.0018131628,0.112045646,0.000020988813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95281446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9754774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0760121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0760121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07426021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5515089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1778150094","doi":"","title":"An ethical framework to understanding Canada's mature minor doctrine","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open ULeth Scholarship (OPUS) (University of Lethbridge)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minor (academic); Doctrine; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05656591951497585,"score_gpt":0.3483879996001119,"score_spread":0.29182208008513605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1778150094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04022655,0.0018779251,0.01565634,0.14299151,0.0007483746,0.00021136455,0.00025588673,0.00007555173,0.7979566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8195539,0.0008635838,0.011637298,0.025430357,0.00027336206,0.00018028438,0.00008527303,0.00009404773,0.14188187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98937106,0.0024244536,0.00023251868,0.00083999976,0.0037819624,0.0033501408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890616,0.0035784435,0.00032691128,0.00062674104,0.0045256843,0.0018805845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008537062,0.00053941563,0.000570357,0.0020782305,0.034390446,0.020332025,0.003928057,0.011018798,0.008157885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018076042,0.00048239817,0.0007007669,0.0024041885,0.038927376,0.004174871,0.004992241,0.014959307,0.00052980107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019308925,0.0000041881813,0.00011480182,0.0000034554655,9.582066e-7,0.00003117684,0.0030438942,0.000065404245,0.000025259364,0.98902065,0.006341546,0.0013467357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002433284,0.000012497241,0.0017835365,0.00022679479,0.000016302212,0.00011385365,0.021066021,0.0011219284,0.0002384731,0.6017316,0.37360117,0.00006343295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9578685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97155297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11193964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11193964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25838894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8121827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W17783591","doi":"10.1126/science.13.319.211","title":"Challenging English-Canadian Orthodoxy on Democracy and Constitutional Change","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitution; Orthodoxy; Democracy; Elite; Conversation; Law; Humanities; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.07178905838013909,"score_gpt":0.3030945892290276,"score_spread":0.2313055308488885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W17783591","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040553734,0.02338598,0.0039496007,0.37561545,0.0016340901,0.00006028791,0.00019323896,0.00004972489,0.5545579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8813236,0.0076977205,0.001703306,0.036477562,0.00053177396,0.000044122327,0.000055919867,0.000053601423,0.072112344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98849523,0.0030559076,0.00020692228,0.0010499505,0.0036245873,0.0035673708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99307764,0.002988418,0.00027578278,0.00024633508,0.0024376165,0.0009741975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073743337,0.00039376097,0.0005053284,0.0016372926,0.027816478,0.013028821,0.0016955829,0.00479231,0.005262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00918311,0.00022915076,0.0003162216,0.0020215106,0.038846064,0.0038748863,0.003905035,0.0071870782,0.00029275115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000083704745,0.000006342998,0.00032745334,0.000026772133,0.0000024834492,0.0001263743,0.01050671,0.00012950721,0.000056149267,0.97263217,0.011984773,0.004192846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037977064,0.000016360358,0.0040463693,0.00049888005,0.000027464239,0.00015691774,0.044771206,0.0008435015,0.0003699362,0.19785163,0.75129163,0.000088143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9776698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9847178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15549423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15549423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13646133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97950697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1780446522","doi":"10.15353/cjds.v4i3.233","title":"Moving from the Implicit to the Explicit: ‘Spiritual Rights’ and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Disability Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Convention; Law; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Political science; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.08476779260325165,"score_gpt":0.32316522806993186,"score_spread":0.2383974354666802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1780446522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048628114,0.046424944,0.013660064,0.2541456,0.0049522603,0.000042378644,0.000094621726,0.000041976087,0.63201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88802487,0.013344059,0.0057384144,0.041102394,0.0021995944,0.00015917784,0.0000953614,0.00009208818,0.049244046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98708564,0.008090211,0.00037619294,0.0007570852,0.0024576816,0.0012331869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99461764,0.0036186418,0.0004751965,0.00048333523,0.00046186146,0.00034332107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009034283,0.00044980718,0.00042544148,0.0012815746,0.006596774,0.008865584,0.0012061668,0.006573217,0.0039638947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010882902,0.00018851648,0.00039285925,0.0016306815,0.040009644,0.012309787,0.009510381,0.010044329,0.00037587283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064232995,0.000005564546,0.00011047709,0.00002707035,0.0000012013351,0.000043914297,0.008714749,0.000045542347,0.000061954546,0.98112905,0.0033305835,0.0065234164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011968487,0.00003908532,0.0011326788,0.0012012066,0.0000053624126,0.00021986017,0.015675815,0.00015877346,0.000262571,0.48249835,0.4987442,0.00005010415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0137273865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018091545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0137273865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043224036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065194718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047778487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1785276250","doi":"","title":"Fundamental justice : section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Irwin Law eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Political science; Economic Justice; Fundamental rights; Law; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.02749355643614702,"score_gpt":0.2688117696838131,"score_spread":0.24131821324766609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1785276250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012151649,0.0058617806,0.0016000584,0.024560163,0.0022787494,0.00016118653,0.0004161613,0.00008600829,0.96382076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0663795,0.0063774167,0.0052952208,0.035188645,0.0012563898,0.00036528314,0.0004576428,0.000282967,0.8843969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98981816,0.00090625696,0.00026844657,0.00077896874,0.0054318514,0.00279642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99603134,0.0006457419,0.00010104696,0.00025443087,0.0025066035,0.00046077365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046553332,0.0011590591,0.0009831622,0.0033245587,0.023266032,0.015497629,0.0033210167,0.014535934,0.021649309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008657267,0.0011498228,0.0011138698,0.0038087019,0.019501785,0.0049535623,0.0036165959,0.019606741,0.0040033665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038435314,0.00000998072,0.000053784544,0.00002956059,0.0000022378129,0.000025751677,0.0014805803,0.00006382701,0.00004272224,0.82914865,0.1633706,0.0057684435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009291529,0.000005506955,0.0007113069,0.00029292525,0.000010700361,0.000053588974,0.0010337868,0.00010194968,0.00011733341,0.116188556,0.8814231,0.000051772222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.957685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9753142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.932721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06727901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19799297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48814565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1785387284","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1241","title":"Sexual Assault Cases in the Supreme Court of Canada: Losing Sight of Substantive Equality?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Sexual assault; Law; Substantive due process; Political science; Credibility; Substantive law; Mythology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.09693128402642802,"score_gpt":0.3550192984585977,"score_spread":0.25808801443216967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1785387284","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25950524,0.10644246,0.0011949469,0.32042992,0.0015295225,0.00014123313,0.0005955069,0.000061624145,0.3100995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9294738,0.020182243,0.0006802578,0.028618844,0.00031857722,0.000022198752,0.0001553042,0.000022166596,0.020526644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896974,0.0011997806,0.00024287238,0.00064031995,0.0039304453,0.004289126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98820835,0.003401034,0.00080180814,0.0003147373,0.0054690773,0.0018051527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063631814,0.00025820747,0.0006550003,0.0027759126,0.020324755,0.010843149,0.003397366,0.0049076057,0.0043592225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024118107,0.00051822566,0.00053210097,0.0047603976,0.0100913625,0.0032340137,0.0026239392,0.0066444105,0.00026874276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011037161,0.00010912663,0.02665882,0.0005126414,0.00014965613,0.0019179154,0.033329066,0.0014414721,0.0006396356,0.69096607,0.12425529,0.11990993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015247884,0.00009172454,0.16833784,0.0022659637,0.00037407246,0.0006749703,0.072349794,0.0017817031,0.0015472383,0.06733827,0.68465155,0.0004343927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99570364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99823785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13927281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13927281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25732303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99832153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1787790696","doi":"","title":"Benevolent Grandfathers and Savage Beasts: Comparative Canadian Customary Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.07665035861705931,"score_gpt":0.3391201210979738,"score_spread":0.26246976248091447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1787790696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3496484,0.05366816,0.0010189124,0.049988005,0.0005940657,0.00009312862,0.00043700344,0.00003796797,0.54451436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9389263,0.014845135,0.00056315906,0.004919032,0.000076753306,0.000035031575,0.00012593034,0.00003668992,0.04047189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99398345,0.0007146299,0.000119522694,0.0005594412,0.002162895,0.0024599878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947524,0.0016871964,0.00028543308,0.00020326568,0.0023209385,0.0007507814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048382822,0.0004925604,0.0009108281,0.0058201193,0.045992434,0.011901724,0.003918209,0.0056757396,0.012414627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0156102525,0.0006125736,0.00054412097,0.011646028,0.025078531,0.004446222,0.005466648,0.0057522943,0.0004403155],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091960064,0.00007564155,0.0148211,0.00041260046,0.000035081775,0.00095984736,0.19352329,0.00027814964,0.00026103764,0.6586246,0.043819934,0.08709679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036938458,0.00005043354,0.118581235,0.001791368,0.00016001692,0.00059373205,0.32291573,0.00050699234,0.0003126198,0.035316262,0.5195396,0.00019514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99519414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13317786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13317786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20869614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96627754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W179279375","doi":"","title":"Changing the Rules of Succession to the Throne","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Throne; Sovereignty; Realm; Parliamentary sovereignty; Successor cardinal; Government (linguistics); Statute; Legislature; Constitution; Ecological succession; Power (physics); Law; Relevance (law); Political science; Queen (butterfly); History; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.029434930468199307,"score_gpt":0.30109057292000196,"score_spread":0.2716556424518027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W179279375","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12644833,0.0020095373,0.009870808,0.030272584,0.0018359008,0.00015953359,0.00007356557,0.00010882493,0.82922095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8684199,0.0006818798,0.004481925,0.007726132,0.00016795113,0.00006741783,0.000036399484,0.000087241744,0.11833123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898807,0.0031006054,0.00046609744,0.0014217433,0.0024597743,0.0026711295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99240667,0.0023330743,0.00068294385,0.00083870086,0.0024185334,0.0013201596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076539572,0.00018426323,0.00036169606,0.00075934635,0.010181443,0.008160138,0.0011341015,0.0036287524,0.0057827844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019295933,0.00047741315,0.00030266162,0.0007644984,0.01118546,0.0030472423,0.0032776385,0.005377557,0.0014873892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042939027,0.000039435243,0.0025374286,0.000042341624,0.0000072465555,0.00022402586,0.012875771,0.0006061847,0.0007214876,0.93887526,0.02265353,0.021374334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056797733,0.000121586716,0.009595662,0.0003242062,0.000016997266,0.00021637855,0.01303843,0.001095474,0.001229576,0.12562199,0.84856457,0.000118351134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23552868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36990696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23552868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009920294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020038081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46831548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1796568189","doi":"10.15353/cjds.v4i3.229","title":"Entre l’accommodement de la croyance religieuse et l’accommodement du handicap en milieu scolaire: les tribunaux devraient-ils adapter leur analyse?","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Disability Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.07616781252069249,"score_gpt":0.35148170591785255,"score_spread":0.27531389339716006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1796568189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6326472,0.018632004,0.003365666,0.040334843,0.00052717346,0.0000902667,0.00013562675,0.000020894124,0.30424628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97726476,0.0053787883,0.00063639897,0.0013662841,0.0001050689,0.000034286048,0.000040104715,0.000013684376,0.015160556],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801207,0.00082423736,0.000053791893,0.0001481722,0.00041083217,0.0005508952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817896,0.0006223699,0.00020891131,0.0001239034,0.000484469,0.00038144158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015687264,0.00039750326,0.00032525347,0.0016899117,0.008903129,0.008108375,0.0009282291,0.001388723,0.008738744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029540635,0.00015935043,0.0002717812,0.0026187617,0.015729416,0.003022462,0.0036364512,0.0026957917,0.0005721563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007885157,0.000086459,0.04072424,0.0004369453,0.00004773531,0.0012401942,0.48805714,0.0002176263,0.0006551701,0.38934535,0.005244669,0.073865645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016191241,0.0000933305,0.08139264,0.0018152234,0.000042822503,0.0005469917,0.7360043,0.00033441526,0.00044019768,0.03268956,0.14656223,0.00006206388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2826989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37139302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71730113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009831462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014743422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56210685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1796634019","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1004","title":"Anticipation: Expressive Freedom and the Supreme Court of Canada in the New Millennium","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Supreme court; Trilogy; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Institution; Law; Fresh Start; Political science; Legislature; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Economics","score_opus":0.039816830484869094,"score_gpt":0.3104606522187074,"score_spread":0.2706438217338383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1796634019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08019653,0.014032513,0.0016179589,0.29072604,0.0013331209,0.00008399709,0.00037319385,0.000044953027,0.61159164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8887855,0.0034134581,0.0006580155,0.042487144,0.0003205019,0.00004470244,0.00009076522,0.00003545155,0.064164564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887334,0.0015852004,0.00020724925,0.0010266557,0.0047260416,0.0037214325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99034846,0.00410623,0.00053489924,0.00026534125,0.00268411,0.0020609363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008064459,0.0002898487,0.0004368546,0.0019578638,0.032200884,0.019693356,0.002335187,0.007242278,0.0070868395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020534366,0.0004639487,0.00041525363,0.0026823669,0.02212174,0.005154698,0.0058874087,0.013667624,0.00034605578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002949967,0.000013191911,0.0015201054,0.000032258802,0.000010567296,0.00019695437,0.009418727,0.00019307715,0.00012944527,0.9396442,0.039294727,0.009517223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063562264,0.000025516636,0.012264444,0.0005688639,0.0000695425,0.00013233976,0.026891014,0.0009743109,0.0007000526,0.1931211,0.7649706,0.00021870616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9771845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11584627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11584627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16111325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8405274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1798509042","doi":"10.15353/cjds.v4i3.228","title":"Introduction: Law, Religion, Disability","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Disability Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law and Religion; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.07447783812540515,"score_gpt":0.34656170016388704,"score_spread":0.2720838620384819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1798509042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0097200405,0.04456119,0.0034922285,0.2760043,0.020581026,0.000130477,0.0023105356,0.00014949006,0.64305073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32109,0.07371118,0.010131013,0.1339044,0.02385275,0.00059963175,0.0028571864,0.00017961087,0.43367422],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929047,0.00026479783,0.00003777911,0.00012203739,0.00021171242,0.00007325592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851245,0.00077114574,0.000104690494,0.00005223422,0.00031807035,0.00024135958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009872208,0.00047178,0.00029569792,0.0011040017,0.0032991155,0.0041755033,0.00086590427,0.0035586029,0.06999912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021596958,0.00014084011,0.00021995402,0.0023627675,0.004448331,0.0042410796,0.002623313,0.0034362664,0.007859238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025863299,0.000048963884,0.0023527436,0.00048012487,0.0000045630627,0.00018523804,0.009886501,0.00007643562,0.0001329345,0.36865082,0.5488143,0.06934146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006080208,0.000020063071,0.0039436496,0.0007778756,0.0000035579706,0.00035913606,0.00777961,0.0000573651,0.000031832806,0.038572922,0.9484364,0.000011464544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010691104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011400257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06999912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016952569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003107711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23417044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1804800675","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1012","title":"“Grand Entrance Hall,” Back Door or Foundation Stone? the Role of Constitutional Principles in Construing and Applying the Constitution of Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Foundation (evidence); Law; Classics; Philosophy; Sociology; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.043648682914405844,"score_gpt":0.3029809875130487,"score_spread":0.25933230459864287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1804800675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05249935,0.031697925,0.005655045,0.29212365,0.0013611487,0.000098747616,0.000787315,0.00010154435,0.61567515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8639674,0.011247499,0.0031946937,0.022656595,0.0002786416,0.00004346422,0.00019428959,0.000064930195,0.09835251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969112,0.0005815213,0.00005191861,0.00022695812,0.0011066569,0.0011217635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810094,0.00049748126,0.000073998875,0.000082667524,0.0009041027,0.00034078184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028351936,0.0001957219,0.000285995,0.0012947682,0.010959304,0.009394276,0.0015367628,0.0024887945,0.005001677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007331157,0.00021667377,0.00017397491,0.0017101006,0.013471716,0.0030182637,0.0013845507,0.0031898967,0.0003897216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000091537095,0.0000051757493,0.0008549623,0.000042371314,0.000005286723,0.00007278197,0.0027998814,0.00021199585,0.00010739523,0.9381315,0.045429815,0.012329593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020877567,0.00001531946,0.010720384,0.0004054274,0.000030723146,0.00007271465,0.012643782,0.0006465281,0.0004600991,0.14730951,0.8276034,0.00007116324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98052865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9928717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055862963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055862963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.122705884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40531605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1805164954","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1291","title":"The Aboriginal Constitution","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Proclamation; Honour; Parallels; Law; Metis; Supreme court; Political science; Subject (documents); History; Library science; Engineering","score_opus":0.03198981137321786,"score_gpt":0.35548339706523163,"score_spread":0.32349358569201375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1805164954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02963219,0.015949767,0.0012698612,0.026148245,0.0008056821,0.00006416294,0.00031392925,0.00004131651,0.92577493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6419586,0.010918113,0.0023696853,0.02164273,0.0003289369,0.00014224797,0.00028679796,0.00004381034,0.32230908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979432,0.00042427,0.00004227302,0.00022988845,0.000693753,0.0006666373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998946,0.00020003157,0.00006801807,0.00009174355,0.00051794364,0.00017633727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016955868,0.00021863279,0.00026459154,0.0009816777,0.011635751,0.004304623,0.0010145599,0.0020502587,0.005922585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027822345,0.0002100084,0.00017877194,0.0012868317,0.007997443,0.001009511,0.0021532942,0.0030613642,0.00071568624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059637405,0.0000037652173,0.0005678064,0.000034820423,0.00000408836,0.00013130292,0.006069337,0.000044744822,0.00014178788,0.96748525,0.018276097,0.007235094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071636146,0.000012882252,0.0054943548,0.00024635755,0.000017214554,0.0001331802,0.0046633272,0.000073076255,0.00017272809,0.024911648,0.9642536,0.000014462648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8239255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.889326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1760745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018226082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05362389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35422283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1809332466","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1273","title":"Three Theories of “Principles of Fundamental Justice”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Fundamental rights; Political science; Charter; Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Sociology; Human rights; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0690053156794604,"score_gpt":0.3428734720913906,"score_spread":0.2738681564119302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1809332466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011661313,0.008412917,0.11963248,0.13787523,0.0013962628,0.00034434057,0.0002962434,0.00019448657,0.7201868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7824208,0.007826931,0.07828383,0.053442407,0.0029637387,0.0014481156,0.00044229015,0.00020184158,0.072970085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9785967,0.0056478838,0.0007609439,0.0030349612,0.00898702,0.0029725265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872639,0.005729002,0.0011673456,0.0015707964,0.003417117,0.0008517416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02192312,0.0011937397,0.0010248901,0.004456547,0.0096105505,0.014261601,0.005546581,0.011029922,0.0059200223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020779558,0.00091051625,0.001746506,0.0025057981,0.082200654,0.015098106,0.0066031925,0.017220635,0.0013881326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.1628735e-7,0.0000021540095,0.000027173419,0.000006933931,0.0000011495074,0.000004100988,0.00020378995,0.00004893632,0.0000049791956,0.9982621,0.0008600038,0.00057792076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009388921,0.000006531292,0.00017821211,0.00007700364,0.0000036592985,0.000024173907,0.00029347485,0.00037219666,0.000054387092,0.9712272,0.027737768,0.000016049235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07179861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062162284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07179861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030645048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0298058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22234643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1809684683","doi":"10.7202/028101ar","title":"Conciliation : The End of Compulsory Boards","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Conciliation; Nova scotia; Legislature; Political science; Law; Arbitration; Sociology; Ethnology","score_opus":0.04771465919461898,"score_gpt":0.3093931287138139,"score_spread":0.26167846951919493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1809684683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30039957,0.0018758602,0.0076845703,0.041404612,0.0015275307,0.00029942743,0.00014230475,0.0001663319,0.64649975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83948934,0.00033154216,0.002317632,0.011196366,0.00037885012,0.0000957453,0.0001178022,0.000055210043,0.14601755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98061895,0.0042586364,0.0005344289,0.0013219847,0.0052826507,0.007983315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.967293,0.009466534,0.0030642448,0.0043146918,0.009598253,0.0062632295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011985467,0.00022364226,0.0002571861,0.0011793497,0.011161226,0.008701553,0.001962784,0.0067025074,0.011461194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03925163,0.0004928328,0.00034497847,0.0010040293,0.0056112283,0.0040417095,0.005062385,0.005925747,0.0014925253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035946176,0.0003629447,0.03241838,0.00012298433,0.00002513976,0.0012126295,0.020103903,0.00058950006,0.0021016097,0.6734554,0.11297704,0.15627086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100527766,0.00047272348,0.0980135,0.00047754333,0.000028819493,0.00061752275,0.013805272,0.0010129614,0.0031237535,0.04923368,0.83301055,0.00010327076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0564461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.122033216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0564461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076236012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01300663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11223513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1814050479","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4359","title":"STATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROTECTION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS DECISION IN LENAHAN (GONZALES) AND ITS APPLICATION IN CANADA","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Due diligence; Human rights; Political science; Commission; Law; Domestic violence; International human rights law; Context (archaeology); State responsibility; Declaration; State (computer science); Economic Justice; International law; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.051554643403361425,"score_gpt":0.3801888644527322,"score_spread":0.3286342210493708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1814050479","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029837258,0.01787529,0.0034305982,0.6156673,0.0033704357,0.0002369813,0.0003531235,0.000081848615,0.32914728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62791455,0.011694353,0.004709502,0.22229064,0.0008367814,0.00022618816,0.00015843079,0.000111708454,0.13205785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9753643,0.0037366056,0.0008105989,0.0025649166,0.0086129615,0.008910549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98685026,0.0051932177,0.0005184938,0.00051616365,0.0042342944,0.0026876286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013289504,0.00082185486,0.0009483959,0.0018498132,0.03936097,0.019077392,0.004409525,0.024339767,0.005301201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031718068,0.0010250586,0.0011464221,0.0029682259,0.03303192,0.005020802,0.008599336,0.024196133,0.00040834976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002549669,0.000027580385,0.0016219657,0.000069310765,0.000021032134,0.0005552137,0.01571875,0.0003584775,0.00015749344,0.8885094,0.08368596,0.009249331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009270054,0.000039244354,0.010527911,0.0013396542,0.000120623976,0.0003017485,0.038192708,0.0011522145,0.0008772179,0.101066425,0.8458322,0.00045732883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9909401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15575896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15575896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30926606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97919995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1815499224","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004720","title":"Beguiled By Metaphors: The “Living Tree” and Originalist Constitutional Interpretation in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitution; Doctrine; Constitutional interpretation; Law; Constitutional law; Original intent; Political science; Supreme court; Original meaning; Constitutionalism; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Democracy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.013431635003973036,"score_gpt":0.275409109206593,"score_spread":0.26197747420261996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1815499224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09497096,0.0151483575,0.008147671,0.15738346,0.001164424,0.00007014206,0.0003772964,0.00012929749,0.7226083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9504499,0.0045493785,0.0024663927,0.010138493,0.00016256378,0.000030700103,0.00009515934,0.00008499998,0.032022417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947214,0.0012867536,0.00008761573,0.00048123163,0.0018892025,0.001533743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99664706,0.001200846,0.000195325,0.00017752516,0.0012803369,0.0004989152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003050766,0.00038062932,0.0004084876,0.0022382906,0.027868267,0.01414487,0.002539301,0.0033161226,0.004788243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006322358,0.0002701817,0.00046836646,0.0046445853,0.051003404,0.0047624265,0.0044934475,0.0068055526,0.00029844776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007169135,0.000005026244,0.0003681574,0.000018489276,0.0000025566217,0.00012949189,0.0172324,0.00014043857,0.00005287846,0.9687884,0.009855663,0.0033992326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038824935,0.000017151395,0.0048257858,0.00036781453,0.00004665875,0.00027698456,0.07654774,0.0023804905,0.00037099145,0.43366116,0.48131058,0.000155805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98655427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9908241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17810898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17810898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15770029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9532771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1820504405","doi":"","title":"From Consultation to Reconciliation: Aboriginal Rights and the Crown’s Duty to Consult","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Negotiation; Constitution; Political science; Law; Treaty; Good faith; Action (physics); Competence (human resources); Faith; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.01660251668214259,"score_gpt":0.321153408812515,"score_spread":0.3045508921303724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1820504405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042927902,0.0037819664,0.006599057,0.18948498,0.00057747826,0.000055350767,0.000026906488,0.000029893832,0.75651646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9350609,0.0015235549,0.0019264058,0.020471869,0.0003638107,0.000075105294,0.000017236518,0.000030392255,0.04053063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98128134,0.008985163,0.00046463395,0.0011738972,0.0032534127,0.0048416317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98679554,0.0076293643,0.000857312,0.0011151085,0.0020475197,0.0015550734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013702476,0.0002642124,0.0004291211,0.0011405369,0.022048222,0.0155176865,0.0021948447,0.019016363,0.006976876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02858744,0.00046031005,0.00062425487,0.0011224883,0.051556803,0.010388285,0.016802056,0.011265925,0.0007492611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008555409,0.000009830223,0.00017548443,0.000019248679,0.0000031066593,0.00037651628,0.035800647,0.00008805198,0.00009199624,0.9548279,0.004977391,0.0036212362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003077138,0.000033876746,0.0014149477,0.00038404024,0.000017485381,0.0009585394,0.05349399,0.0005276461,0.0003598728,0.7047726,0.2379499,0.000056310913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.091916874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09162904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90808314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013409922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033500113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1827637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1821930445","doi":"","title":"The Courts and the Colonies: The Litigation of Hutterite Church Disputes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mennonite studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.022354854563735232,"score_gpt":0.32833172565600355,"score_spread":0.30597687109226834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1821930445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.625932,0.0030759112,0.0003308326,0.06657665,0.00019343024,0.00004145411,0.000021505823,0.0000066582484,0.30382153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871389,0.00037541724,0.00006799176,0.0029455712,0.00005054169,0.000010555982,0.0000031118254,0.0000043004543,0.009403667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939667,0.003364366,0.000093930306,0.00022383279,0.0004885732,0.0018625405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99055696,0.006816826,0.0007413188,0.00026269117,0.00054259686,0.0010795381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056663314,0.0002133472,0.00040893213,0.0010137433,0.029259337,0.011816817,0.0017131103,0.009834716,0.01126816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01933943,0.0003299825,0.00021992192,0.0013871982,0.02201718,0.004631261,0.007796089,0.008397855,0.00028578265],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010358447,0.00011561713,0.0055036317,0.00007647549,0.000021941476,0.0031696516,0.27042994,0.00021200205,0.00038929714,0.6874487,0.018565826,0.013963272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012515279,0.0000793032,0.018385071,0.0006984438,0.000053947955,0.0008681321,0.7110817,0.00077822275,0.00068734435,0.10061229,0.16655914,0.00007126021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13737333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29874143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13737333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0091431765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012858215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27314746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1825135887","doi":"","title":"Full-text of APPEAL Volume 19 (2014)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Principle of legality; Charter; Political science; Human rights; Milestone; Desert (philosophy); Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.028033673872029607,"score_gpt":0.3324681279183465,"score_spread":0.3044344540463169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1825135887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008328236,0.0016007943,0.00020352329,0.016056946,0.008165678,0.00040655755,0.0021645448,0.00048596473,0.9700832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031054816,0.00055450096,0.000102647515,0.014670872,0.0038896175,0.00024157588,0.00061644806,0.00013633126,0.97668254],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757224,0.00015499843,0.000105393345,0.00026968526,0.0013603326,0.00053734233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99658054,0.00077722385,0.00007728116,0.0003249491,0.0017346683,0.0005053533],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017746558,0.0009557624,0.0015699196,0.0035404842,0.008396644,0.010172198,0.003282306,0.017401272,0.5764566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009211659,0.00094048405,0.0015692888,0.0022407838,0.0019334843,0.0025594414,0.0035751776,0.0073787295,0.3924302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016020354,0.00010180676,0.00021216147,0.000050880644,0.0000051852144,0.00011514455,0.000050267965,0.00003536813,0.000111841866,0.00649272,0.97852397,0.014284604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003383601,0.000020499576,0.0017512017,0.00020080766,0.0000099148565,0.000043305245,0.00014964743,0.00009618267,0.0000819192,0.0025566292,0.99503577,0.000020321066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05750289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.104880646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5764566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007023532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00990292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60413325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1827804112","doi":"","title":"Joint Custody and Guardianship in the British Columbia Courts: Not a Cautious Approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Law; Statute; Political science; Legislature; Family law","score_opus":0.016540014199596,"score_gpt":0.2599763367959041,"score_spread":0.2434363225963081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1827804112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11140711,0.10956943,0.009077113,0.33301544,0.0025968654,0.00016301198,0.00038383572,0.00016649348,0.43362072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83600366,0.0322527,0.0053083748,0.058045935,0.000721593,0.00011154044,0.00013315784,0.00012796008,0.06729503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97856414,0.004391397,0.0008892121,0.0029500136,0.007673969,0.005531223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845295,0.0055161477,0.00068417477,0.00081125356,0.006159015,0.002299965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008488124,0.0005733769,0.0009329092,0.0040294877,0.030898876,0.02868928,0.004714844,0.009367052,0.0038290953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02609648,0.001070309,0.0004576583,0.008232239,0.034652222,0.008078917,0.0053787027,0.0185382,0.00048519048],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024841,0.00003135253,0.0042784945,0.00017103877,0.000026305624,0.0004897353,0.026178453,0.00070453685,0.0003555119,0.8739099,0.043486923,0.050342947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005487394,0.000055693283,0.030126952,0.0031135236,0.00014403988,0.0005372915,0.0672434,0.0018420129,0.00085616385,0.12812352,0.76749593,0.00040651124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98763615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18349238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18349238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21607551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9470331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1834014602","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1115","title":"The Forgotten Right: Section 9 of the Charter, Its Purpose and Meaning","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Charter; Law; Supreme court; Framing (construction); Section (typography); Political science; State (computer science); Constitutional right; Meaning (existential); Original meaning; Sociology; Law and economics; Engineering; Epistemology; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.04615148569202904,"score_gpt":0.30328518940377447,"score_spread":0.25713370371174543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1834014602","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14400144,0.014424011,0.044161364,0.14801052,0.0024043606,0.00012764512,0.00023571376,0.00012219402,0.64651275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9628345,0.002215818,0.0051344647,0.008884183,0.00046434734,0.00007087845,0.00006275376,0.00004347738,0.020289542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921051,0.00294851,0.00037417767,0.0010721182,0.00227578,0.001224206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943744,0.0034007872,0.000532963,0.00053608837,0.00086294743,0.0002928415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009685582,0.00023003138,0.00043795083,0.0007524951,0.006199018,0.010337265,0.001514811,0.0044418904,0.0013178831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012193759,0.00030650917,0.00036072638,0.00077732746,0.03981031,0.004782048,0.0034231206,0.008133021,0.00025499158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004715903,0.0000023796322,0.00015673353,0.0000087407025,6.708599e-7,0.00003720895,0.00285931,0.00004526936,0.000075008254,0.99350005,0.0013459203,0.0019639656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022280705,0.00006216129,0.003254555,0.00053991325,0.000019177114,0.00022642943,0.008706647,0.00044061072,0.0007886069,0.68096894,0.30490825,0.00006242601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.097776465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08078494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9022235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01065441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023557944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19441468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W184053494","doi":"","title":"23. What’s in a Face? Demeanour Evidence in the Sexual Assault Context","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OpenEdition (OpenEdition)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Adjudication; Context (archaeology); Sexual assault; Economic Justice; Criminology; Face (sociological concept); Law; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Gender studies; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; History; Social science","score_opus":0.09156541727030972,"score_gpt":0.340454995035806,"score_spread":0.2488895777654963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W184053494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22968823,0.013857685,0.0012887183,0.19621575,0.00094449526,0.000050295384,0.00021254619,0.000019228453,0.5577231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95063114,0.0049933777,0.0004787219,0.016528321,0.00020160356,0.00002224446,0.00005106406,0.00001582123,0.027077625],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99600095,0.0019488095,0.00016585416,0.00026454197,0.00092548016,0.0006943382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951563,0.0023100832,0.0005596624,0.0003408553,0.0011944784,0.0004386423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031331345,0.00025740665,0.00035614753,0.001703526,0.015528755,0.011709906,0.0015261517,0.004263519,0.007850866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012511614,0.00024782785,0.00019589573,0.0011875276,0.030171877,0.007665871,0.0046111806,0.0047019213,0.0009263384],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023464596,0.00004098051,0.012417507,0.00029169625,0.000015675336,0.0051871478,0.55097264,0.000052121366,0.0005292942,0.36066952,0.027629416,0.04217062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039144566,0.00002177484,0.010676902,0.0011104587,0.000015496453,0.0014612101,0.685558,0.000039035545,0.00043404274,0.024146905,0.27650976,0.000022436843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22327277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33167708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22327277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010437641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008107631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44394636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1843056858","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1180","title":"The Contribution of Justice Bastarache to Equality Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Legislation; Charter; Political science; Meaning (existential); Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Common law; Constitutional law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06378760393089664,"score_gpt":0.3822364383040239,"score_spread":0.3184488343731272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1843056858","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031688903,0.032354817,0.0066885506,0.34976146,0.0037740215,0.00007226432,0.00004606635,0.000062237064,0.5755517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80103874,0.007766143,0.0043347864,0.12298017,0.0024849523,0.0000631656,0.000027619652,0.000055095228,0.061249364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9671879,0.008083824,0.00068976526,0.0027575074,0.015276062,0.00600503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798187,0.012330127,0.00056252186,0.0007625535,0.0050178864,0.0015081678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013624348,0.0002771206,0.0007462544,0.0023497874,0.0213023,0.012183093,0.0022925546,0.01248771,0.0031782887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030843308,0.0005884669,0.00055211067,0.0015412326,0.030942041,0.0049058967,0.006952152,0.015354523,0.00041922208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009918129,0.000024081904,0.00048182736,0.00006196727,0.0000087009275,0.0002556066,0.003197413,0.00018910208,0.00014706471,0.95299953,0.025428524,0.01719624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000346291,0.00008791281,0.004198526,0.0005322648,0.00005283476,0.0005076853,0.0038739156,0.000612948,0.0009068751,0.46047103,0.52859616,0.00012512709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32386154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41670406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32386154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020498538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04393462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6439529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W184493464","doi":"","title":"CONVERSATIONS ON ABORTION AND RELATED MATTERS ARISING FROM A CONSIDERATION OF DOBSON V. DOBSON","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia canonica","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.03187984240019163,"score_gpt":0.29538068576642396,"score_spread":0.2635008433662323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W184493464","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049268242,0.016032357,0.0010646908,0.82183355,0.005352073,0.00007994126,0.00005505571,0.000018271874,0.106295764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44708136,0.0046190983,0.0006659124,0.4879006,0.0017319827,0.00012614786,0.000016987236,0.000048192207,0.05780963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9816497,0.01186106,0.0004789706,0.0009349156,0.0021829035,0.0028924313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806506,0.015697658,0.0007635453,0.00022300106,0.00087143655,0.0017938302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017094545,0.00055895175,0.00073018076,0.0007870369,0.045087863,0.007863675,0.002465485,0.039729934,0.0031524221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025067957,0.00074064644,0.00078358175,0.00094641314,0.021888861,0.0043755407,0.0077417223,0.025490329,0.0003609049],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102989325,0.000042302425,0.0016439257,0.00017648633,0.000017069506,0.0064627663,0.3525638,0.00015857034,0.0011484241,0.5486216,0.080065034,0.008997071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022220154,0.000049815448,0.0022482509,0.00051307655,0.000023834815,0.001004901,0.10647793,0.00015675418,0.0006715031,0.022785936,0.86594075,0.000105101564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20404297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3778019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20404297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026432268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02439468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40571064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1849557891","doi":"10.59962/9780774816762-004","title":"Rationalizing Judicial Power: The Mischief of Dialogue Theory","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.019898162243613588,"score_gpt":0.21654317175650492,"score_spread":0.19664500951289132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1849557891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011065381,0.03492327,0.029680524,0.15796821,0.0013738576,0.00005764387,0.00006960608,0.000099275916,0.7647622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8830912,0.014537296,0.012982529,0.028422132,0.002109075,0.00033595992,0.000097123804,0.00026023126,0.05816454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9769042,0.01666844,0.00030278508,0.0012056899,0.0034298673,0.0014890305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792173,0.017570307,0.00038151612,0.0009956349,0.0012636295,0.00057162374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01858656,0.00074097404,0.00088972977,0.0024324143,0.012309474,0.017009776,0.004455276,0.0094398605,0.0043206327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019695325,0.000537091,0.00060048176,0.0023464407,0.09987397,0.017803112,0.0074604354,0.012414721,0.0008684723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018031893,0.0000029299094,0.0000150723135,0.000017985223,0.0000011726519,0.000019633571,0.00545025,0.000060093163,0.00001161272,0.9901333,0.0027118525,0.001574359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001764425,0.0000032048895,0.000040503306,0.00012936594,0.0000034948062,0.000029785762,0.003570129,0.00032714728,0.0000645246,0.93584013,0.059965715,0.000008377074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05014363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036039826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05014363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026018746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019258175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18878013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W185557668","doi":"10.29173/alr376","title":"Will the Circle be Unbroken? Aboriginal Communities, Restora tive Justice, and the Challenges of Conflictand Change, Jane Dickson-Gilmore &amp; Carol La Prairie","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Criminology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11146820095939824,"score_gpt":0.3729026412689713,"score_spread":0.2614344403095731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W185557668","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017825892,0.9134321,0.00005745427,0.06717431,0.004518422,0.0000071029167,0.000021848606,0.000008159106,0.014602297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008860961,0.87949866,0.00023890402,0.039211407,0.0063212966,0.000037862992,0.00006439238,0.000023264996,0.065743275],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797064,0.0005979035,0.00007201134,0.00015304264,0.0009553177,0.00025108457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971193,0.0011243231,0.00021338782,0.000071627444,0.0010428955,0.0004284368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036095865,0.0006335187,0.000810862,0.0022405132,0.0053369645,0.008520035,0.0017554332,0.004495786,0.009205289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062663057,0.0006399692,0.0004230487,0.0037929653,0.008326304,0.005756736,0.00202327,0.0056599407,0.002131805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009191797,0.000015107668,0.00017634944,0.0007882921,0.000011339254,0.00007703658,0.0020395375,0.00006351523,0.000050781226,0.036201056,0.91054815,0.05001951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003745942,0.0000066572106,0.0008511504,0.0011679286,0.000009610842,0.00007639495,0.002269494,0.000013443563,0.000019489604,0.0049656397,0.9906063,0.0000100953675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.332132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6165659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.667868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015024984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042942144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6603976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1857043480","doi":"","title":"Table of Contents for: Sexual Assault Law in Canada: Law, Legal Practice and Women's Activism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Law; Political science; Sexual violence; Criminology; Law reform; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.019632971852347313,"score_gpt":0.29327462812733174,"score_spread":0.27364165627498444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1857043480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00152273,0.020545281,0.000264813,0.018262032,0.009985517,0.00034442722,0.013498098,0.0005687764,0.93500835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0081429565,0.017038168,0.00037541174,0.004144949,0.0021161868,0.00009643311,0.0051319064,0.00034929073,0.9626048],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938464,0.000024271982,0.000017007262,0.000049939663,0.0004122121,0.00011187729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978331,0.00018749484,0.00005843979,0.000052713545,0.0013431555,0.00052510964],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025936044,0.00080824073,0.0008430512,0.003477715,0.0063572535,0.0057687517,0.0011779374,0.0014909315,0.33038157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021540432,0.00033640684,0.00041512877,0.00875474,0.0009589426,0.0018237438,0.0014368041,0.0015510012,0.08035081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003108828,0.000010286148,0.00018707596,0.000095865136,6.7074546e-7,0.00002256867,0.00014183388,0.000031193038,0.000040549294,0.0011475321,0.9831924,0.015127006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016934401,0.000003642097,0.0025775982,0.00022139725,0.0000015168611,0.000030508374,0.0003663165,0.000037057427,0.000021146627,0.00026639013,0.99646556,0.0000071923414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8470359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94462436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33038157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027535634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035451747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95512944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1859312411","doi":"","title":"Insidious Idolatry: Canada's Aboriginal Leaders and the Legal Whiplash","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Whiplash; Idolatry; Political science; Criminology; Public relations; Law; Psychology; Medicine; Poison control; Environmental health; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030269696485967106,"score_gpt":0.3256762590916458,"score_spread":0.2954065626056787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1859312411","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14120616,0.2060952,0.00055174384,0.44943643,0.0035915854,0.00011884717,0.00027459755,0.000044736833,0.19868067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75758225,0.12757134,0.0007032527,0.07551987,0.0013891443,0.000070491755,0.00012898832,0.00003914222,0.03699556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601525,0.0004532521,0.000106868734,0.00022247629,0.0016146482,0.0015874754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993648,0.0020409417,0.0004899283,0.000100542384,0.0022189154,0.0015016122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035189465,0.00030471728,0.0005965201,0.0025798571,0.024665916,0.011252962,0.0035778538,0.007947808,0.005348545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012056028,0.00040107343,0.0003346038,0.0045326985,0.020869162,0.0022602042,0.0037531327,0.009254826,0.0003030829],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064977954,0.000245143,0.025774645,0.0017976465,0.00005224891,0.0023404537,0.17233844,0.00050819834,0.0003908848,0.3767162,0.23766229,0.18210879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044981593,0.000055832275,0.059039023,0.005664678,0.00014358464,0.0006810796,0.2609173,0.00028896096,0.00031360914,0.017684301,0.65503794,0.00012872119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98446566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91916776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08083226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36514992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5864818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1863832171","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4407","title":"Introduction: Re-Igniting Critical Race In Canadian Legal Spaces: Introduction To The Special Symposium Issue Of Contemporary Accounts Of Racialization In Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Racialization; Race (biology); Praxis; Scholarship; Critical race theory; Sociology; Gender studies; Media studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0251121704079767,"score_gpt":0.3101698702645446,"score_spread":0.2850576998565679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1863832171","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016033967,0.12361209,0.0020430938,0.5586945,0.17307496,0.00020554638,0.0022969535,0.00029058688,0.13817883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05314132,0.18552154,0.005298822,0.26922733,0.12603639,0.00055331114,0.0027298196,0.0009811234,0.3565103],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979869,0.00018438544,0.000060939532,0.00022511349,0.0010710169,0.00047171168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99403715,0.0010205795,0.0001383502,0.00011616771,0.0036766885,0.0010110075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022598074,0.0014259428,0.0007936474,0.0036363427,0.016257742,0.00954356,0.0025863722,0.0062206704,0.031911522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069775335,0.00060661056,0.0008300206,0.0056637875,0.0062588244,0.0047538932,0.0035067794,0.010057808,0.004762409],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004683942,0.000005646336,0.000105667925,0.00008060317,0.0000014831795,0.000016047068,0.0011186107,0.00003247439,0.000051869978,0.006609195,0.98503125,0.0069425297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002838797,0.000003271785,0.0009840394,0.0002906034,0.0000036936372,0.000026852147,0.0017337183,0.00003156629,0.000030808667,0.0018424569,0.9950294,0.000020762973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8664705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9487901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.956655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043344993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053506345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3144914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1866183247","doi":"10.29173/cmplct8843","title":"Compliance or Complicity?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Complicity An International Journal of Complexity and Education","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Compliance (psychology); Business; Psychology; Political science; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.16520285183106206,"score_gpt":0.43230392855965133,"score_spread":0.2671010767285893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1866183247","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008962137,0.0015853939,0.00003614782,0.9854386,0.012112202,0.000003022253,0.00000887541,0.00000616913,0.00071997236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017448327,0.00071098766,0.000056326924,0.9861523,0.0085835,0.000013229458,0.0000058397245,0.000016048212,0.0027169338],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863143,0.0043926407,0.0011814787,0.0024736284,0.0037083752,0.0019296687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93485934,0.04293125,0.0030197182,0.0016446289,0.0088141775,0.008730893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013615245,0.0013684748,0.0020446028,0.0012004565,0.014779754,0.013626391,0.0041818707,0.065763064,0.014587924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08566413,0.0011622189,0.001484603,0.0015921101,0.01842882,0.014315403,0.011490842,0.08375005,0.0047282684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009307134,0.00001088764,0.00015499663,0.000053822045,0.000006332863,0.00013586851,0.0016386636,0.00001435826,0.000033169646,0.004776698,0.98932564,0.0038403068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023791647,0.000019661991,0.0005732043,0.00057495845,0.000014996763,0.00043849458,0.013818217,0.00006635631,0.0000733258,0.0063529285,0.97798663,0.000057263853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015956344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028634705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065763064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074072652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015097304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07200521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1868345552","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2000.tb00553.x","title":"THE SECOND ANNUAL MEYER ELKIN ADDRESS","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Honor; Queen (butterfly); Conciliation; Wright; Law; Management; Sociology; Library science; Political science; History; Art history","score_opus":0.03615540671168817,"score_gpt":0.3405818266283443,"score_spread":0.30442641991665614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1868345552","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00081310247,0.007865242,0.00045091182,0.016887167,0.08222251,0.0000993573,0.001440322,0.0005659019,0.8896553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014065212,0.001804926,0.00010941683,0.0016462604,0.0050630397,0.000026059386,0.00034418752,0.00017815271,0.98942137],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986488,0.00012429497,0.000054702126,0.00024794062,0.0006889414,0.00023540232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850166,0.0001058394,0.00008465165,0.000096382944,0.00058120314,0.00063027063],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009042188,0.0014324016,0.0006695594,0.0016474145,0.0030435913,0.006675919,0.001037563,0.0026559972,0.61342806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028893831,0.000438046,0.00048120963,0.0009018166,0.00066011964,0.003383301,0.003920091,0.002930614,0.5007536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012060758,0.000012103518,0.00005752215,0.000026677573,7.861258e-7,0.00004359792,0.000017174129,0.000009064554,0.000103394224,0.00090430555,0.9827231,0.016090171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014033355,0.0000051011843,0.000098718825,0.000029017525,3.8084113e-7,0.00003290491,0.000023818819,0.000008035812,0.000028229251,0.00011072138,0.9996599,0.0000017335509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002206454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055485144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61342806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021326635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026923108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5513979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1874599610","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-0208.2011.00309.x","title":"Wife‐Abuse in Eighteenth‐Century France – By Mary Trouille","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Citation; History; Classics; Art history; Library science; Philosophy; Theology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05253720827175517,"score_gpt":0.3309042183520501,"score_spread":0.2783670100802949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1874599610","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20728178,0.14628868,0.0004177304,0.43328634,0.007076017,0.000029404975,0.0000687883,0.000024911238,0.20552641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7884814,0.04451141,0.00023397447,0.054870207,0.004373608,0.00004657984,0.000033329165,0.000058024412,0.107391424],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981375,0.0012440389,0.000041159186,0.00009342178,0.00014391953,0.0003398839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985208,0.0008320577,0.00019470855,0.000037748574,0.00018219347,0.0002323938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024149835,0.0004074158,0.00045435925,0.0008556206,0.020459048,0.0045546023,0.0009896264,0.005019747,0.0051762965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037185294,0.00034890368,0.00026053595,0.0009857749,0.009763579,0.0049491622,0.0037282014,0.0077371816,0.00061204017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041519153,0.00006302259,0.0015854336,0.00011822924,0.000024466344,0.002011457,0.7369051,0.00006252242,0.0001657701,0.15433314,0.08920478,0.015484529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075795197,0.000028312943,0.0030543548,0.00056686916,0.000007781338,0.001112258,0.21846732,0.000029560624,0.00010656536,0.0047805444,0.77181315,0.000025633706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0763675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13743359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0763675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006186865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043082684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15184599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1875405869","doi":"10.1163/15685349-12341305","title":"Richard Billingham and the Oxford Obligationes Texts: Restrictions on positio","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vivarium","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); History; Computer science","score_opus":0.04810025478749757,"score_gpt":0.3110074338910977,"score_spread":0.2629071791036001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1875405869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.170296,0.029763225,0.006070024,0.046535354,0.001351472,0.000041401287,0.0000723565,0.000048205893,0.745822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9608137,0.0027188384,0.0013089558,0.001866696,0.00042294164,0.00003276338,0.000023243261,0.00003976258,0.03277309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955901,0.0027253914,0.00019472525,0.00033706834,0.0008297307,0.0003230452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98890674,0.009041921,0.00065988966,0.00046068427,0.000528237,0.00040252932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027621698,0.00021258187,0.00028890983,0.0010275265,0.005513087,0.005589639,0.0007417006,0.0019729882,0.004529995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011342198,0.0003400534,0.000108018656,0.00091532414,0.018447805,0.004639987,0.0027723496,0.0036543682,0.000438183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002902163,0.000008913884,0.000618239,0.00010399946,0.0000029476223,0.00022457115,0.070298634,0.000066438464,0.00022709786,0.9106899,0.008264581,0.009465612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024093366,0.000059626305,0.0061739306,0.0006063634,0.0000140011625,0.00068379764,0.05912978,0.00024428024,0.0011739035,0.15749136,0.77432877,0.00007004114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011164109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01699956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011164109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004515572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015509076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032762945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W188382782","doi":"","title":"La médiation familiale","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024921715977329874,"score_gpt":0.3239175080618043,"score_spread":0.2989957920844744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W188382782","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040028993,0.013315982,0.010158772,0.028066259,0.0015582725,0.00014563416,0.00082593213,0.0002415209,0.9056587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.714982,0.011266109,0.00434842,0.0052990844,0.0009151714,0.00034606774,0.00060081115,0.00009011948,0.26215234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953557,0.001958527,0.00019905563,0.00077269593,0.00079738663,0.00091655925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685186,0.0009917165,0.00057649484,0.0005779603,0.0005351351,0.0004669132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002408678,0.00073321117,0.00051681313,0.0017704767,0.005917009,0.0059427707,0.0009781944,0.0021606507,0.06723727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008719063,0.0003056259,0.0006957955,0.0017447926,0.0068468186,0.004257723,0.006514853,0.0031792782,0.008156457],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040222854,0.00008149492,0.008482993,0.00017101652,0.00006922409,0.0027341046,0.019052813,0.00018872213,0.00039386106,0.8348428,0.039383367,0.094559304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002193269,0.000049931543,0.00709931,0.00046234104,0.000038785987,0.004512729,0.00879593,0.00017618934,0.00032163804,0.075015366,0.9034636,0.000042191787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019300796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015703635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06723727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00455673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005779139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22493106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1892109340","doi":"10.22230/cjnser.2012v3n1a106","title":"Funding Charities Through Tax Law: When Should a Donation Qualify for Donation Incentives?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of nonprofit and social economy research","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Donation; Incentive; Gift tax; Statutory law; Income tax; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Humanities; Welfare economics; Economics; Tax credit; Philosophy; Direct tax","score_opus":0.3301997195044747,"score_gpt":0.44471219101954734,"score_spread":0.11451247151507266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1892109340","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07870217,0.024184138,0.0082783215,0.50575405,0.0038480358,0.00021159838,0.00071923167,0.00020300757,0.37809935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8622131,0.011486873,0.0041605043,0.056465738,0.0031309945,0.0002933041,0.00052337046,0.00012618977,0.06159999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98059356,0.0075885104,0.0009376097,0.0014845614,0.004678069,0.0047177575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9389725,0.02464808,0.0060629467,0.0026209145,0.022111094,0.0055845506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027751744,0.00033154248,0.00072512805,0.0033830823,0.0060194233,0.018238612,0.002025101,0.005797569,0.019246666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08605465,0.00038159537,0.0006371578,0.0032064037,0.009380268,0.010980204,0.0054196287,0.0069883754,0.002566067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018144576,0.00016337838,0.013998671,0.0003284465,0.000021919739,0.0002615791,0.0030098844,0.00052558404,0.00026341155,0.81181026,0.10723843,0.06219703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112987436,0.00015836417,0.028092444,0.004826041,0.00009511066,0.00035264975,0.01639679,0.0020412696,0.0012789689,0.32171056,0.62473935,0.0001954623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051747262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06585533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94825274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022973197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032226693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16668296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893559805","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004422","title":"The Cultural Limits of Legal Tolerance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Multiculturalism; Constitutionalism; Dialogic; Law; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Legal culture; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Political science; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.046076258290730955,"score_gpt":0.3158658241002884,"score_spread":0.26978956580955743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893559805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39556575,0.0047481116,0.008009436,0.045471136,0.00022913358,0.000032847813,0.000038406975,0.00003654492,0.54586864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755883,0.0003435198,0.00023226006,0.0007143604,0.000017974362,0.0000067547935,0.0000038147627,0.0000062233,0.0011162984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98830557,0.0048776865,0.00033459248,0.00091762183,0.0032210343,0.0023434453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925615,0.003331874,0.0007813304,0.0008399893,0.0013674576,0.0011178142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006172671,0.00023294186,0.00038823468,0.0018225115,0.016207805,0.010227337,0.0019513931,0.001981949,0.0028717702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016073883,0.0002821419,0.0003200373,0.0012738087,0.070108406,0.005773849,0.010399967,0.0040593953,0.00014908891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011837573,0.000013204381,0.0020722516,0.00002757996,0.00000762778,0.00018908335,0.09756592,0.00015806146,0.00017715436,0.8901641,0.0006724987,0.008940796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024420242,0.00003921968,0.011569389,0.0005104099,0.000035240115,0.0005724562,0.23428985,0.00078294,0.00055938144,0.62224436,0.12929085,0.000081552644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22602887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1743506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77397114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01585408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019897483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44942647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1894175811","doi":"","title":"Making Sense of Aboriginal and Treaty Rights","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Treaty; Fundamental rights; Political science; Indigenous; Constitution; Fiduciary; Common law; Supreme court; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.031013383303550097,"score_gpt":0.3614882278066499,"score_spread":0.33047484450309983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1894175811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011759051,0.004890891,0.024044124,0.033759516,0.00076206826,0.00007161478,0.00013087204,0.000066905464,0.924515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83624446,0.005728178,0.013846329,0.010520089,0.0010111211,0.00014726639,0.00016923671,0.0001463319,0.13218698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992059,0.0023507942,0.00024372141,0.0009752459,0.0026274563,0.0017437706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99609214,0.0015780376,0.00030241394,0.00058948883,0.0010319734,0.0004058218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010306481,0.00064339704,0.00082001725,0.0024833903,0.012812127,0.014265577,0.0026446949,0.004515544,0.006624835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012039115,0.00048181246,0.00060243363,0.0026777019,0.0542506,0.009414732,0.009703824,0.0061271093,0.0006472563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011692431,0.0000010132272,0.000041067706,0.0000051577813,0.0000011748295,0.000030308214,0.0050636153,0.000041164523,0.000026492078,0.9918916,0.0012507071,0.0016464201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008953626,0.000005282141,0.00055146887,0.00024349634,0.000013240263,0.00007222975,0.008239953,0.00021944317,0.00015010477,0.7199017,0.2705674,0.000026644055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49669686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51414466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49669686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026212106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03729996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98761153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1897283657","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2003.tb00883.x","title":"FAMILY/CHILD JUDICIAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION (JDR)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Family court; Dispute resolution; Law; Welfare; Political science; Family law; Alternative dispute resolution; Resolution (logic); Best interests; Psychology; Sociology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.04793670436161205,"score_gpt":0.3351885406590122,"score_spread":0.28725183629740014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1897283657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20025147,0.08320971,0.027547134,0.023764994,0.0037685335,0.004061668,0.001009687,0.0003209822,0.65606576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8671064,0.014575727,0.014002589,0.008693858,0.0005689643,0.00075544097,0.00049693027,0.000054020267,0.09374608],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.985859,0.0054313736,0.00091760827,0.0012234679,0.004835334,0.0017331806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828668,0.009904809,0.0010893601,0.0008972368,0.0044213207,0.0008204917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025078949,0.0002024695,0.00045515207,0.0019771548,0.005656238,0.0044139214,0.0022908943,0.0026370964,0.00580579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029338436,0.00033027644,0.0003620897,0.0016011823,0.0024759104,0.0013049763,0.0031556094,0.0023400935,0.00086573965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016181855,0.00040251328,0.008080791,0.002100451,0.000044072563,0.002340432,0.010629038,0.0009223886,0.0023720127,0.27074948,0.119988404,0.58220863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013681517,0.0006903148,0.020951526,0.0009252757,0.00007903106,0.0017707462,0.0062740487,0.0007664538,0.0050068586,0.016580777,0.9467526,0.00006544854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050176527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11059841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050176527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052773724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017642876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13263178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1901499918","doi":"10.3138/topia.30-31.165","title":"Settling Accounts: On The Subject of Economic Confessions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confessional; Confession (law); Capitalism; Subject (documents); Narrative; Context (archaeology); Social order; Position (finance); Sociology; Relation (database); Order (exchange); Political economy; Aesthetics; Political science; Economics; History; Law; Literature; Finance; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.0696324753936835,"score_gpt":0.3462145803250806,"score_spread":0.2765821049313971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1901499918","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21524371,0.011498526,0.0119806295,0.05978028,0.0014624235,0.00008592099,0.00013124685,0.0001209482,0.6996963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825415,0.0017691858,0.00081395084,0.00242189,0.0005092909,0.00003503606,0.00004431491,0.000078928104,0.011785904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98508507,0.009481052,0.00045471152,0.00087299204,0.0024955804,0.0016107039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748632,0.017902482,0.0018367345,0.0018475133,0.0027959424,0.00075411896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011492684,0.00047237353,0.00044258684,0.004360173,0.023208803,0.017265214,0.002144951,0.007037416,0.0072540916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037964836,0.00044294307,0.00038134804,0.0038303563,0.046884254,0.016413715,0.008550028,0.0075246836,0.00050344615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015632892,0.000007488963,0.0005512602,0.00003601232,0.000003596679,0.00032879572,0.25377616,0.00003113318,0.00007178275,0.7341668,0.0043512955,0.0066600638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021122556,0.000015916947,0.0019040131,0.0010706234,0.00001818537,0.0008240187,0.3338944,0.0005793677,0.00049791345,0.23485065,0.42626527,0.000058507532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029394364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023471165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029394364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010311414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005638493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074814856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1902148784","doi":"10.1017/cha.2015.6","title":"Should Governments be Above the Law? The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal on First Nations Child Welfare","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Children Australia","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Assembly of First Nations; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Statute; Harm; Human rights; Welfare; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Child protection; International human rights law; Public administration","score_opus":0.09487384469426566,"score_gpt":0.3485617653913811,"score_spread":0.25368792069711543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1902148784","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055876337,0.0062926947,0.0013941214,0.56680566,0.0010304307,0.00007444354,0.00018510793,0.00006108894,0.36828023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7818652,0.0042628846,0.002241193,0.10345028,0.00021794683,0.00005401193,0.000069160225,0.000062148734,0.10777715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879189,0.0016567071,0.0001526897,0.00076945906,0.0033001048,0.0062021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99549675,0.0012865746,0.0002429749,0.0002217677,0.0014773103,0.0012745928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004871047,0.00036390754,0.00040619305,0.0009874504,0.034764245,0.011522843,0.0019252662,0.008639549,0.005758674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012397123,0.00037294795,0.00054121687,0.0017243598,0.02256763,0.0043439637,0.0034887034,0.010687278,0.00043146082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010368905,0.000015771358,0.0018951276,0.000034766763,0.000005334336,0.00043247332,0.014940684,0.00016350747,0.00021601353,0.91676193,0.054485094,0.011038986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028533148,0.000023676885,0.013165754,0.0004577144,0.00003810983,0.0002974782,0.04929355,0.00048079394,0.0006737151,0.066585384,0.86879945,0.00015582544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99027693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13388623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13388623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2348181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9714171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1904965409","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1164","title":"Supreme Court of Canada Constitutional Cases 2007: Defining Access to Justice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Economic Justice; Law; Dissent; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.09791640408892952,"score_gpt":0.3577640589548148,"score_spread":0.25984765486588524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1904965409","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032667853,0.010678466,0.0023078236,0.102334715,0.002260146,0.000642102,0.006568875,0.00021304235,0.842327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4875996,0.008832643,0.0067306706,0.1557319,0.0013423061,0.00095981907,0.002931026,0.0002647873,0.33560723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98155206,0.0012983244,0.00068191777,0.0015721674,0.00815379,0.0067417403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842455,0.0051416936,0.0005758514,0.00071010436,0.0071730996,0.0021538227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076174536,0.0011525732,0.0012222449,0.0047225584,0.03005024,0.022576403,0.006567422,0.022154933,0.010476123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022984928,0.0022152744,0.0013688417,0.0067044734,0.0125302505,0.0035125313,0.0043852963,0.014754869,0.0012316598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022082048,0.00003238134,0.0014706036,0.000066326465,0.00001961828,0.0004088315,0.0020921254,0.00037406557,0.00020634709,0.8336192,0.15705787,0.004630597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014600654,0.00003226198,0.013293983,0.00090836023,0.00014782048,0.00027085116,0.006450979,0.0018635344,0.0009458512,0.08261776,0.8929502,0.0003724676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9905799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8121687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18783131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2812437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94200057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1906128875","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1227","title":"Canadian Federalism and the Principle of Subsidiarity: Should We Open Pandora's Box?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Federalism; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Cooperative federalism; Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Sociology; European union; Economics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14454690059098801,"score_gpt":0.36397738416182734,"score_spread":0.21943048357083933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1906128875","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026480334,0.048950724,0.0068441024,0.47280914,0.0018292445,0.000049612092,0.0003533473,0.00008888992,0.44259465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8437604,0.029470684,0.0058213263,0.06353273,0.0012483621,0.00006540295,0.00019450425,0.00006633439,0.05584033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99548364,0.000651358,0.00008154941,0.00045782235,0.0018561817,0.0014695962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707687,0.00095017813,0.00019581293,0.00017567864,0.0011569805,0.00044453374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028423448,0.0003162834,0.0005645701,0.0017006018,0.014123882,0.0072598867,0.0017796364,0.0036603976,0.0049126125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008099003,0.00025262905,0.00053264113,0.0027283358,0.01943769,0.004487066,0.0026211368,0.0056101345,0.00030845864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054026273,0.0000027948868,0.0003575238,0.000022116976,0.0000041831004,0.000034343826,0.00093840674,0.000073064686,0.000027643717,0.97728866,0.01405336,0.007192452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036225807,0.00001715197,0.0070649195,0.0003481386,0.000039403865,0.0001139532,0.0027963344,0.0005704881,0.0001621286,0.4011911,0.5875854,0.00007477012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97545743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98404527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076047346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.076047346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12731054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5517647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1910688488","doi":"","title":"A Dangerous Step Backwards: The Implications of Conditional Permanent Resident Status for Sponsored Immigrant Women in Abusive Relationships","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Context (archaeology); Domestic violence; Government (linguistics); Residence; Immigration law; Law; Political science; Criminology; Jurisprudence; Institution; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Geography","score_opus":0.07167891146118106,"score_gpt":0.35851966959434095,"score_spread":0.2868407581331599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1910688488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77329874,0.0029804248,0.00022991294,0.1699462,0.00029440603,0.000035985566,0.0000625458,0.000006783499,0.053144973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983668,0.0024365766,0.0001271295,0.010050128,0.00008513049,0.000017648003,0.000016872347,0.0000058622513,0.0035925733],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733883,0.0012699016,0.00005742887,0.00012823338,0.0002587067,0.000946913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953164,0.0022419116,0.00075841584,0.00015124166,0.00047528686,0.0010566845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029401095,0.00019044873,0.00021235601,0.00068967993,0.01629494,0.0044130995,0.0014024763,0.0032597776,0.004701883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009860833,0.0002036513,0.00048997597,0.00091342966,0.011840416,0.002990606,0.0043652225,0.003855217,0.000228435],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014013221,0.00020473856,0.16317138,0.00019983812,0.000041116364,0.008258742,0.5900465,0.00025059245,0.00060062803,0.14534198,0.023530848,0.06821349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009741496,0.00007459373,0.07897054,0.0007143894,0.00004347774,0.0011327298,0.8829348,0.0001484634,0.00019961441,0.00958342,0.026140159,0.000048096153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4078829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6682995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5921171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010626712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02023228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8110175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1910847956","doi":"10.7202/001475ar","title":"Le recours précoce à la ligature des trompes au Québec : des suites indésirables?","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Sociologie et sociétés","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.3352341570036728,"score_gpt":0.4596854724304865,"score_spread":0.1244513154268137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1910847956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926398,0.0010500669,0.00024117887,0.001245128,0.000017118844,0.000010833893,0.000120384386,0.0000052369646,0.004670201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946418,0.0008564021,0.00011708168,0.00016308644,0.00001290027,0.00000774546,0.00005474623,0.0000038734884,0.0041423407],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915147,0.00017840629,0.000024589059,0.000078685815,0.00023551787,0.00033141015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747974,0.00060394127,0.0008677963,0.000076180666,0.0006130513,0.00035924828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094787,0.00018347711,0.0002547396,0.00087027246,0.0035542313,0.0014393266,0.0007868726,0.00063464936,0.0039461716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005462805,0.00017285383,0.00016008355,0.0012521406,0.0021413583,0.00070358143,0.00091583014,0.00092288334,0.00019253603],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021850358,0.000059705366,0.70017076,0.0002083463,0.000060665374,0.0022502798,0.20854019,0.00019814429,0.002090737,0.0018980318,0.0031464049,0.081158325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026375496,0.00008440107,0.8574264,0.000112657544,0.000029841201,0.0004684763,0.1308916,0.000103914834,0.00033249022,0.00011564447,0.010409179,0.000022766122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8673545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9582392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13264549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008260754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057889777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26685327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1913254193","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1248","title":"Stare Decisis and Constitutional Supremacy: Will Our Charter Past Become an Obstacle to Our Charter Future?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Law; Constitution; Doctrine; Political science; Legislature; Common law","score_opus":0.05136210201716434,"score_gpt":0.351625516492381,"score_spread":0.30026341447521665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1913254193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09294758,0.015006931,0.0072281216,0.29017636,0.0015518755,0.00006825797,0.00010765587,0.000072014045,0.59284115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9168952,0.0036861491,0.001538389,0.026948333,0.00049798994,0.000025009544,0.000036284015,0.00002442153,0.05034821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99324566,0.001267786,0.00021207816,0.0008259997,0.0024460566,0.002002369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933356,0.002917745,0.0008419939,0.00060216524,0.0015909404,0.0007115746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007719582,0.00017204975,0.00048987905,0.0014208454,0.011550951,0.016468823,0.0015606156,0.0075692423,0.003841602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017645141,0.000293306,0.0005213346,0.0012179561,0.038227018,0.008304202,0.0032118522,0.009687379,0.0003262771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038133053,0.000006419546,0.00045016513,0.000010388538,0.000001911611,0.00006302767,0.0017133948,0.000078302655,0.000037345795,0.9899877,0.0035530108,0.0040945713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003580204,0.00006901649,0.0101687275,0.00041739832,0.000031415428,0.00023847586,0.013238625,0.0012205683,0.0008973562,0.59600556,0.3775748,0.00010234275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41922432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58280504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97094613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029053893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042203177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83356833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W19147253","doi":"","title":"Physicians and the Ontario Human Rights Code","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Courage; Elite; Law; Politics; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Political science; Conscience; Sociology","score_opus":0.02557630002152114,"score_gpt":0.30667202054363907,"score_spread":0.28109572052211795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W19147253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004401626,0.005597446,0.00037075378,0.13159552,0.002167726,0.000108250555,0.00071226317,0.000074069336,0.8549723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07905919,0.0047586337,0.0010448402,0.055947535,0.000848543,0.00020272197,0.00054721994,0.00010655622,0.85748476],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916346,0.0008433178,0.0002802968,0.0006388101,0.0037055041,0.0028974747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896318,0.0018815752,0.0004906155,0.0006791621,0.0040259887,0.00329091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040646116,0.00039429532,0.00033935404,0.001838568,0.0175776,0.0074321004,0.0015150647,0.0076208427,0.04927138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0143366195,0.0005256289,0.00033858424,0.0020813905,0.008358236,0.0026037153,0.00489962,0.0054897796,0.00638166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028178434,0.00003122533,0.002379554,0.00007115006,0.0000053608765,0.00019294463,0.00204499,0.00007994469,0.00013809634,0.4466976,0.5229509,0.025380125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009582099,0.0000046736354,0.0035402249,0.00010257828,0.0000023471107,0.00003585204,0.0006407928,0.00004058595,0.000026848762,0.0068817115,0.98869914,0.00001563949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8690413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9337922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13095868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04835418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1200995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35083574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1921973096","doi":"10.21991/c9sm1p","title":"\"A CONSTITUTIONAL CONFERENCE ... SHALL BE CONVENED ...\": LIVING WITH CONSTITUTIONAL PROMISES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional law; Constitutional review; Constitutional economics; Political science; Constitutional interpretation; Law; Constitution","score_opus":0.06731187242642653,"score_gpt":0.28561022802357255,"score_spread":0.21829835559714603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1921973096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008480907,0.0027314858,0.0109921675,0.3767335,0.01127575,0.00041554862,0.00035550346,0.0002530041,0.58876216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25001267,0.0020393217,0.010620627,0.13068785,0.0067552864,0.0007611589,0.000405843,0.00023366894,0.59848356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818693,0.0075696474,0.00057570636,0.0015617409,0.004505771,0.0039178487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895263,0.003361374,0.00079889747,0.0010284921,0.0021083301,0.0031766293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020282425,0.0004864805,0.00052085525,0.00052590854,0.016802229,0.012238007,0.0020145522,0.019788262,0.03173936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03157059,0.0005244976,0.00064592593,0.0006543913,0.008276668,0.008715462,0.008540418,0.017410545,0.00798595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021755272,0.000036490634,0.0002134801,0.000052735923,0.0000042172264,0.00010774484,0.0024915345,0.000081779865,0.0008153767,0.7764962,0.21216169,0.0075169913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002385296,0.00002759334,0.00065999187,0.00009671134,0.000006375003,0.00008647431,0.002914157,0.0001077588,0.0005433902,0.059579697,0.93591064,0.00004329511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009107778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017792936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03173936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005098142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024929378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107265055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924668998","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2035134","title":"Putting the Legal Treatise in its Place","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.019357911207956744,"score_gpt":0.30636643105923583,"score_spread":0.28700851985127906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1924668998","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00833004,0.0039099306,0.002649476,0.66394323,0.007882562,0.000021813674,0.0000761359,0.000060616832,0.31312618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5012967,0.003092798,0.0029570367,0.28409767,0.007870406,0.00013303275,0.00011916738,0.000380778,0.20005238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833929,0.0067135403,0.0007922325,0.0018058275,0.004624682,0.0026707575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822603,0.008167563,0.0009612605,0.0023351426,0.003962918,0.002312778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016434442,0.0004817953,0.0012762692,0.0020825546,0.021234382,0.02394684,0.0027772065,0.034245986,0.016569104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051946424,0.0006841564,0.0008073671,0.0021363797,0.036526844,0.023313211,0.011259559,0.04076299,0.0038618515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070220976,0.000017188177,0.0001355186,0.000013255837,0.0000040986693,0.00004793135,0.0029989898,0.000026723264,0.0000644501,0.9495524,0.043224048,0.003908412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025421308,0.000024562365,0.00057301216,0.00034831345,0.000017642595,0.000078274694,0.008255405,0.00014597179,0.00026556008,0.47886005,0.5113514,0.00005441137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030503986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042400025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034245986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009866514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027558103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08691472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1925438246","doi":"10.5508/jhs.2009.v9.r20","title":"Review of S. Olyan, Disability in the Hebrew Bible","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hebrew Scriptures","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hebrew Bible; Philosophy; Theology; Literature; Art; Biblical studies","score_opus":0.03382345115884832,"score_gpt":0.3579066613624408,"score_spread":0.3240832102035925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1925438246","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003569336,0.9912111,0.000020480227,0.0054225065,0.002685918,0.0000020486116,0.000029615989,0.0000016413652,0.0005909814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007804987,0.9875609,0.00006356002,0.0059880796,0.0047630873,0.000009309193,0.00004804044,0.0000038321914,0.0007826555],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999231,0.00024476196,0.00018521487,0.00007926321,0.00021178463,0.00004798419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99513525,0.002931104,0.00039409022,0.000093539486,0.0012136262,0.00023245491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002492181,0.0008411979,0.0021414114,0.006873305,0.00091424125,0.002055523,0.0015080314,0.002953475,0.005903226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008328946,0.00048968603,0.00038899021,0.0063143196,0.0017511643,0.0028341194,0.0013105421,0.0024578318,0.0025574155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009836152,0.00002333975,0.0001787913,0.017394474,0.000067297784,0.00015384401,0.00042141762,0.00007927493,0.00016623132,0.0035490475,0.6989767,0.2788912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017545644,0.000023504474,0.0011519263,0.012038217,0.00005174189,0.00042935577,0.00021660286,0.000015828946,0.000051054623,0.0007286626,0.9852608,0.0000147450855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008753887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023727892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008753887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002024313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043293354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01974821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1926811835","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1290","title":"The Law of the Land: New Jurisprudence on Aboriginal Title","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Indigenous; Political science; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Milestone; Denial; Indigenous rights; Common law; Legal history; Sociology; Human rights; History","score_opus":0.028217852532724925,"score_gpt":0.3481949345341023,"score_spread":0.31997708200137737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1926811835","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027603498,0.39522982,0.0063965917,0.18391587,0.00326411,0.000059786144,0.00013622617,0.000039951465,0.3833542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73960114,0.15623848,0.0052968417,0.050709527,0.0033071674,0.00009712911,0.00011764833,0.00008063651,0.044551406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867715,0.003977074,0.00043626444,0.0011143733,0.006400865,0.0012998807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824759,0.012273623,0.00047244452,0.0006533985,0.0035248038,0.0005997634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014617731,0.0003779343,0.0009422299,0.00495028,0.011459583,0.012219759,0.0030752677,0.0060841413,0.0018465811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013242111,0.00048541508,0.00045089136,0.005356814,0.05319643,0.006380689,0.0036975523,0.009034673,0.0001727945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000387985,0.0000068839086,0.00019520707,0.00013167145,0.000004771374,0.0001247324,0.011298689,0.000114815324,0.0000984269,0.97050226,0.008271858,0.009246758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017652765,0.000026418988,0.0035552534,0.0017094626,0.000031638632,0.00019369669,0.0108386045,0.00034961393,0.0002718161,0.21508357,0.76785797,0.00006436198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8290925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88508844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1709075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06302084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07993016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45725036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1934338030","doi":"10.7202/1120172ar","title":"(Re)Producing Nation: Race, Gender, Sexuality, The Sovereign and the Living Constitution","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subordination (linguistics); Constitution; Race (biology); Political science; Identity (music); Jurisprudence; Human sexuality; Sovereignty; Sociology; Ethnology; Law; Humanities; Gender studies; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.10250674480207539,"score_gpt":0.4008193229287437,"score_spread":0.29831257812666834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1934338030","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07194102,0.008893966,0.005456287,0.043818835,0.00048643016,0.000015995869,0.00004421978,0.000024651787,0.8693185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9666205,0.0015754352,0.000936847,0.0015474098,0.00009696746,0.000016156004,0.000018751767,0.000021630505,0.029166227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845934,0.00079104706,0.0000294938,0.00015778246,0.00029402625,0.00026830923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947125,0.00023520128,0.000046150657,0.000085718195,0.00007728735,0.000084388295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026487669,0.00021924819,0.000258078,0.00081694045,0.0073062177,0.007588243,0.0006830661,0.0015655794,0.0036438052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020667866,0.000092589085,0.00016907557,0.00082918775,0.047511403,0.004267086,0.0035452398,0.002690703,0.00026653378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011671157,0.0000016259895,0.00008549941,0.0000041022686,4.3429554e-7,0.000018169187,0.0075786286,0.00001721018,0.000030896423,0.9889488,0.0007703953,0.002543032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048370675,0.000011613042,0.0015744382,0.00017039727,0.000007844488,0.00009056974,0.032553997,0.00011295357,0.00041700518,0.7008901,0.2641549,0.000011325932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08412107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13828564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08412107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007108097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009574757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16726285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1935771292","doi":"","title":"Introduction: la fin de Oakes?","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Normative; Democracy; Political science; Meaning (existential); Constitutional law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.0540344915262779,"score_gpt":0.38308039229326224,"score_spread":0.32904590076698437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1935771292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022310766,0.09179229,0.002121908,0.32302082,0.035091795,0.000032506006,0.0005871167,0.00012948006,0.544993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.067126274,0.03639631,0.0022423156,0.11601178,0.015105153,0.000075658696,0.00041363854,0.00034691262,0.76228195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973725,0.00065794814,0.00007396208,0.0006264985,0.0009008579,0.00036824716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998447,0.0005464021,0.000079589685,0.00013835038,0.0006113913,0.00017717069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025418256,0.0006939793,0.00057771994,0.0010172325,0.0060980823,0.007478411,0.0011155449,0.0049613575,0.027385233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054293913,0.0003525875,0.00053041475,0.00093689543,0.0063158814,0.0051087197,0.0018600976,0.0073300996,0.0067885397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025884217,0.000013223644,0.0001988841,0.00009018408,0.0000049684945,0.00006669782,0.0013068749,0.000043888795,0.00011653381,0.49040616,0.48983237,0.017894357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037164878,0.0000025949423,0.00025238507,0.00018536924,0.0000019725885,0.000031027925,0.00033891958,0.000019743002,0.000055706103,0.012956702,0.98614454,0.0000073051483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22445361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23740631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22445361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009635208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008244769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4462943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1938787646","doi":"","title":"Article: Of \"Passport Babies\" and \"Border Control\": The Case of Mavis Baker v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Immigration; State (computer science); Political science; Immigration policy; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Media studies; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.027677684449155474,"score_gpt":0.2998086573471514,"score_spread":0.2721309728979959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1938787646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31655982,0.0074832416,0.0007413381,0.23295297,0.00070559524,0.000056513843,0.00014756618,0.00005082311,0.44130212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9391969,0.0017024773,0.0001524179,0.01678484,0.000093961775,0.00002084966,0.000019087836,0.000023440338,0.04200612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981919,0.0005118226,0.000024774408,0.0001316877,0.00039387506,0.00074601464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852043,0.00073752267,0.00016429814,0.000049307546,0.00021233918,0.00031612025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011898448,0.0003017077,0.00027867826,0.0006129959,0.034231346,0.007126957,0.0014678793,0.006877717,0.0067484695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005503978,0.0002527606,0.00020014816,0.0010798388,0.019155717,0.0026443528,0.0036664892,0.0072408663,0.00025838404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003786531,0.000036435,0.004682386,0.000073389194,0.000011890239,0.005368884,0.38441822,0.00012092991,0.00032688494,0.5060806,0.088645324,0.010197161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018992634,0.00002263123,0.007333505,0.00035741722,0.00003591569,0.0018989465,0.49837482,0.00017931047,0.00051673414,0.016130747,0.475075,0.000055957837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8836773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9265059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116322696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02858419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029736612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23401546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1941541426","doi":"","title":"Challenging Legislative Infringements of the Inherent Aboriginal Right of Self-Government","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Parliament; Legislature; Law; Constitution; Political science; Corporate governance; Prima facie; Constitution of India; Legislative history; Public administration; Law and economics; Business; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.02047155980995342,"score_gpt":0.306697950037722,"score_spread":0.2862263902277686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1941541426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074877255,0.0048143743,0.007393482,0.11392815,0.0013481176,0.00028110493,0.00011578583,0.00009145692,0.79715025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82725775,0.003815744,0.006340231,0.06567893,0.001032738,0.0002979397,0.00007064743,0.00008343177,0.09542258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96897674,0.008822561,0.00097640685,0.002957814,0.009838923,0.008427592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96260405,0.024293497,0.0014685965,0.0022158795,0.007919085,0.0014988957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033818215,0.00093285507,0.0010421908,0.001347667,0.02308971,0.017156918,0.0050547654,0.02196453,0.0059418404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041526828,0.0010712199,0.0014603776,0.0011379361,0.023845864,0.005353565,0.010151775,0.024114836,0.00085504237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026439886,0.00003765564,0.0006494701,0.00006843768,0.000025174966,0.0009224952,0.011638794,0.00056825584,0.00067728886,0.970372,0.010985303,0.004028519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020733607,0.00028810865,0.0057844245,0.0017111116,0.00046972896,0.0011874496,0.028183881,0.00502799,0.007427214,0.38014835,0.5692132,0.0003511889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51876235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62148327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48123765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031725287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06301141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9681435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1945132981","doi":"10.7202/1069353ar","title":"THE FINAL WORD: After the Residential School Apology: Why All Canadians Should Care about a Racial Equality Case Before the Canadian Human Rights Commission","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"First Peoples Child & Family Review An Interdisciplinary Journal Honouring the Voices Perspectives and Knowledges of First Peoples","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Racial equality; Human rights; Political science; Sociology; Law; Race (biology); Criminology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.0397160387539153,"score_gpt":0.35368350301027257,"score_spread":0.31396746425635724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1945132981","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003057456,0.0058803116,0.00017140938,0.90655565,0.069079936,0.000059552036,0.00020455355,0.000052071417,0.01769078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011631267,0.003073385,0.0007916943,0.9089057,0.0123952655,0.00010913421,0.00017025329,0.00009526074,0.06282804],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822927,0.0017051187,0.0012770699,0.0012901596,0.010695321,0.002739671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9521775,0.0074495594,0.0016323433,0.0011539832,0.033620793,0.003965785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008526031,0.00077290385,0.0015665882,0.0015656257,0.01788017,0.009746753,0.0045306827,0.034807604,0.025045114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06838017,0.00067805545,0.0011208699,0.0017619955,0.01241431,0.006282997,0.0030713535,0.026834318,0.007268422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007758181,0.0000030597953,0.000047192978,0.00004071825,0.000003910904,0.00003717423,0.00021406455,0.0000066629705,0.00002980247,0.0052095735,0.9930796,0.0013204596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038258502,0.000014486391,0.0009152765,0.0004941301,0.000029168305,0.0000866578,0.0022061055,0.00003875488,0.00009806382,0.0042057233,0.99179864,0.0000747401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7562335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79859227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24376649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03568371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09119427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49040413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1951952528","doi":"","title":"The Mythical Power of Myth? A Response to Professor Dauer","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Impartiality; Criticism; Law; Mediation; Jurisprudence; Power (physics); Viewpoints; Empathy; Political science; Discretion; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.024637198689653358,"score_gpt":0.3113668690754152,"score_spread":0.28672967038576186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1951952528","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010693688,0.002823244,0.00006576495,0.9935774,0.0027335559,0.0000011573799,0.0000024749304,0.0000056612507,0.00068378897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008984365,0.0029499037,0.0003276672,0.97457564,0.0075753652,0.000022533353,0.000004766679,0.000028274855,0.005531542],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98600245,0.007973199,0.0005218151,0.0017064713,0.0029549561,0.0008411631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96201897,0.026461715,0.0018534531,0.000985345,0.0060999594,0.0025806152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016076967,0.0007453795,0.0019064815,0.0011474655,0.007991291,0.011535253,0.004710234,0.030574828,0.0043787514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04975969,0.0005613458,0.0009889129,0.0011904116,0.02837125,0.016021065,0.00563391,0.04856807,0.0018190234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022599965,0.00002224426,0.00016968185,0.000097897144,0.000011900465,0.00015172921,0.0034280194,0.000075279204,0.000097354445,0.12459605,0.8645692,0.006758083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003160682,0.00003394741,0.0003232078,0.00053104456,0.000009747621,0.0003274758,0.0073711686,0.00029101782,0.0001690097,0.057401422,0.93344057,0.0000697815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011332886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016973998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030574828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008407657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010819669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08502412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1953916609","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1072","title":"The Political Impact of the Charter","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Victory; Politics; Law; Section (typography); Political science; Government (linguistics); Bill of rights; Human rights","score_opus":0.044173219618805035,"score_gpt":0.37464218048969,"score_spread":0.33046896087088495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1953916609","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010334068,0.15710425,0.00060042064,0.56155616,0.014138827,0.00009941348,0.00022651794,0.000044243134,0.25589615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26846662,0.101997964,0.0011974118,0.42495933,0.008089147,0.00021492195,0.00028517292,0.00012183667,0.19466767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856123,0.0034895444,0.00051747984,0.0010601119,0.007033766,0.0022868945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98717785,0.007119273,0.0011860348,0.00029527102,0.003416982,0.00080459943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011925338,0.0002549622,0.0005248897,0.001812645,0.007172218,0.008052598,0.0017411445,0.0073520495,0.004558807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014628366,0.00040094674,0.0005882541,0.0017752919,0.007912698,0.0033804337,0.002106043,0.010174872,0.00082590966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002935636,0.000047353944,0.0009341117,0.00036858965,0.000019757086,0.00037225633,0.002848979,0.00027318692,0.0005488716,0.5699043,0.36672544,0.05792771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064184937,0.000036058558,0.003399952,0.0005298304,0.000010134049,0.00006615204,0.00085848244,0.00003417751,0.00027572026,0.0051930468,0.9895592,0.000030792467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29271856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32044312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7072815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020281605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053681508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58202946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1954752369","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1065","title":"“Thank God We’re Here”: Judicial Exclusivity in Charter Interpretation and Its Consequences","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Politics; Constitution; Parliament; Legislature; Interpretation (philosophy); Duty","score_opus":0.05347643224030228,"score_gpt":0.34916544021390894,"score_spread":0.29568900797360664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1954752369","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2623443,0.027059674,0.02463223,0.36144775,0.0024216457,0.00014312434,0.0001201505,0.00008427547,0.3217469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96696913,0.0021015632,0.00198049,0.023124116,0.001013011,0.00007525147,0.000021894748,0.00003821445,0.0046763844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9250753,0.051091447,0.0020597682,0.0049446714,0.01205534,0.00477345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8865556,0.08791302,0.0071440972,0.0056068995,0.011445106,0.0013352334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05423964,0.00026260185,0.0008886221,0.0021738757,0.015919138,0.012584646,0.003221293,0.014590426,0.0023467266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11465368,0.0007384081,0.0007954752,0.0028037184,0.056879453,0.009773414,0.0065652817,0.018406888,0.00032226808],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002286869,0.000017571243,0.0008218714,0.000028503135,0.000011615854,0.00028450595,0.0069402303,0.00019154328,0.00008459572,0.9803904,0.0062627024,0.0049435794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014967527,0.00007411548,0.005464626,0.00069306674,0.00008259889,0.00045550166,0.012080378,0.0016775455,0.0011829381,0.8720673,0.105917394,0.00015484855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053941105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054433923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98709476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012905253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014386068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2868501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1955827312","doi":"","title":"Formal Equality in Law, Moral Regulation in Practice: Courts Versus Policy Makers as Champions of Sexuality and Reproductive Rights in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Reproductive rights; Legislature; Supreme court; Family law; Legislation; Administrative law; Sociology; Reproductive health; Population","score_opus":0.04067937791811048,"score_gpt":0.34353778433583687,"score_spread":0.3028584064177264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1955827312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7896142,0.0034974264,0.0014897746,0.07469862,0.00015363828,0.00015945014,0.000109654866,0.000036308444,0.13024098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925808,0.0005406331,0.00030854478,0.001328843,0.000013447397,0.00001385217,0.000016690765,0.0000067948595,0.0051902984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98398376,0.0031585717,0.0003318437,0.00092080847,0.0056374357,0.0059676357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820447,0.0057777907,0.0020587717,0.00058943604,0.0049834824,0.0045457697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00889703,0.00020911127,0.0004626305,0.0023971722,0.027060384,0.012048572,0.0020304054,0.002917149,0.003032574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027388541,0.00044675745,0.0002480789,0.0036092815,0.02639977,0.002720746,0.0059091835,0.0043482203,0.00010740609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009734077,0.0002031606,0.06208149,0.00018666456,0.000039725983,0.000686753,0.25831592,0.0017052521,0.0013419952,0.5869687,0.0128331585,0.07553989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012146908,0.0001337339,0.30911288,0.0007013344,0.00010224723,0.00020341409,0.38427722,0.0040615094,0.001628936,0.064118244,0.23521121,0.00032790678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9930496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21912935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21912935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3510801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90569925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1957331459","doi":"","title":"Replicating and Perpetuating Inequalities in Personal Injury Claims Through Female-Specific Contingencies","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Gender studies; Political science; Personal injury; Sociology; Psychology; Criminology; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07627209118063398,"score_gpt":0.32988526825989245,"score_spread":0.25361317707925846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1957331459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9580709,0.00024913962,0.0022118136,0.0030790982,0.000029443901,0.000030019248,0.00014922504,0.000006934465,0.03617335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991008,0.00003486896,0.00017944339,0.00007502861,0.000008427673,0.0000069813773,0.000014535406,0.0000029664204,0.00057693233],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946108,0.0027490838,0.00016238964,0.0009601163,0.0006656448,0.0008519631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9640827,0.020543609,0.007899055,0.004462234,0.0017810195,0.0012313082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008096219,0.00019993873,0.00031701455,0.0012587814,0.0027405315,0.0029179563,0.001305,0.0013462425,0.009658122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047354564,0.00030358753,0.000252364,0.00092197413,0.00694109,0.0025184636,0.0039361943,0.0020659547,0.00043843573],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079162547,0.0008437497,0.68598896,0.00012728563,0.0002129061,0.0007095253,0.0670921,0.0016199894,0.0019514728,0.17592666,0.002380785,0.06235504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006139366,0.00044884745,0.793776,0.00022646949,0.0001803875,0.00043011823,0.054596517,0.004463793,0.002147054,0.13342842,0.010163063,0.00007794516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01554634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024617227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01554634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019018522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019312818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042817414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1958750971","doi":"","title":"Reading Rights: A Woman's Guide to the Law in Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Law; Political science","score_opus":0.017692108616832913,"score_gpt":0.2783308206167965,"score_spread":0.2606387119999636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1958750971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004332154,0.08095808,0.004809934,0.44616726,0.008592425,0.00052160973,0.0021021764,0.0005680409,0.45194831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04607431,0.053801227,0.010091468,0.11954949,0.0013682992,0.00041979208,0.0006507676,0.0007503316,0.76729435],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975298,0.00034603593,0.000121036755,0.00016845527,0.0010313449,0.0008033064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961714,0.00091330375,0.000078320976,0.00006226858,0.0016549249,0.0011196489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025340926,0.0010030866,0.000852572,0.004581493,0.034607038,0.009718517,0.0027525364,0.009954312,0.023969676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005955847,0.0009868235,0.0005937011,0.0058811274,0.009127893,0.004189131,0.0031431736,0.010723577,0.003992248],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065313147,0.000027633616,0.0005101547,0.0000935785,0.0000038268186,0.00032106115,0.013120956,0.00011963622,0.00013324092,0.044641953,0.90256155,0.038459968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026347277,0.000003110333,0.0010148389,0.00016243718,0.0000035163741,0.00006208089,0.0060170814,0.000044146476,0.000028851196,0.0018485574,0.9907907,0.000022055026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9943663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09183957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09183957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22255422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66634583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1959027866","doi":"10.5663/aps.v3i3.22228","title":"R v. Daniels: Issues of Jurisdiction, Identity, and Practical Utility","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"aboriginal policy studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Federal jurisdiction; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Constitution; Constitutional right; Appeal; Sovereignty; Politics","score_opus":0.07623388348564751,"score_gpt":0.48337669453405224,"score_spread":0.4071428110484047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1959027866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042493116,0.0070934487,0.006005223,0.16738707,0.003280689,0.00027706628,0.0005987898,0.0003322694,0.77253234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5012051,0.0027849344,0.0041704755,0.26638404,0.001793404,0.0004890171,0.00021301852,0.000116898744,0.22284316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98451823,0.003233908,0.0008979823,0.0028671527,0.004108002,0.004374793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893093,0.0071776635,0.0004382825,0.00070804055,0.0016146101,0.0007520932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01576322,0.0005769886,0.0011598145,0.0013023082,0.017230596,0.011023157,0.0047867885,0.022568554,0.008463987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030867573,0.0009931243,0.0011900647,0.0012820318,0.012239516,0.004013391,0.006616051,0.014536645,0.0017676019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056824432,0.000020623984,0.001064303,0.00007770113,0.000015026606,0.0010182867,0.0016270182,0.00030917395,0.00022303831,0.8894108,0.09759049,0.0085866265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001406523,0.00012177459,0.0023480044,0.00070689997,0.00008397795,0.0013594042,0.0030584317,0.0013649649,0.0011491136,0.2532654,0.7361384,0.00026293405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14312604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21164422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14312604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0137127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03353332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2845859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963306621","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.962565","title":"Body Politics, Female Genital Cutting and Cultural Relativism: A Critical Evaluation of the Impact of the Criminal Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Cultural relativism; Politics; Female circumcision; Relativism; Law; Political science; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Criminology; Sociology; Philosophy; Human rights; Epistemology; Medicine","score_opus":0.042493511196909924,"score_gpt":0.3962987680809805,"score_spread":0.3538052568840706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963306621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43484437,0.04448786,0.0027727683,0.24195306,0.0018830239,0.00015192118,0.000096794574,0.000014528113,0.27379566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907198,0.0034380981,0.0001840965,0.004120598,0.00042125283,0.00003120635,0.000006523066,0.000009175473,0.0010692152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99078536,0.006835554,0.00017636531,0.00052547513,0.00085893244,0.00081840326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95363885,0.0398224,0.0026562011,0.0010831167,0.0020367296,0.00076266035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017127747,0.00057582447,0.0006705764,0.004485616,0.011202845,0.009628199,0.002706076,0.0063519306,0.005509002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0328571,0.00044692226,0.000500914,0.0025153654,0.08787446,0.0104194,0.007387686,0.008116467,0.00015779214],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012210304,0.00009331116,0.005718889,0.00043760074,0.00004176916,0.00060174754,0.14392939,0.00018726083,0.00012782373,0.8195815,0.0037414134,0.02541715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007640618,0.0001414074,0.02041068,0.001968171,0.00013425121,0.0006625745,0.6270227,0.00045260292,0.00062350946,0.26113182,0.087303676,0.00007219801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013027318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017845554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017127747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009851749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009735125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0905813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963657152","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0004","title":"Section 28 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms : A Purposive Interpretation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Interpretation (philosophy); Charter; Jurisprudence; Intersectionality; Sociology; Human rights; Law; Political science; Gender studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01426809576238141,"score_gpt":0.24288582967832187,"score_spread":0.22861773391594045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963657152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02680847,0.00366504,0.020079948,0.050689127,0.001518673,0.00029156738,0.0008434317,0.00011519793,0.8959886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73534536,0.004213637,0.026054693,0.023409145,0.00045907125,0.0004669102,0.00056440453,0.00023409573,0.20925269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98708445,0.002377333,0.0002877587,0.0015307277,0.006160073,0.0025595976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938864,0.0014522556,0.00030831867,0.00042632682,0.0033680457,0.0005586466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060727918,0.00076134107,0.00052515866,0.0034972797,0.016821327,0.011648168,0.0020812477,0.0025532432,0.004247226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008637393,0.0005401362,0.0007604227,0.0030420737,0.038578715,0.0025671439,0.004101401,0.005558363,0.0004021598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007132612,0.0000032380283,0.0003419593,0.00002475978,0.0000022957008,0.00008372261,0.008193123,0.00016844006,0.00011526129,0.9715978,0.01461793,0.0048443475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001595856,0.00001769527,0.0051334663,0.00037429266,0.000021538543,0.00012020615,0.020066462,0.00083548686,0.0005996218,0.17985168,0.79285663,0.00010691845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96342033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.976757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07693836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07693836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17169568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5582295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963687429","doi":"10.7202/043576ar","title":"Revendications foncières, « autochtonité » et liberté de religion au Canada","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01144126012250717,"score_gpt":0.26484378956292964,"score_spread":0.25340252944042246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963687429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8310756,0.0029266288,0.0006909568,0.009353564,0.00007458933,0.000047296653,0.0006014704,0.000025119496,0.15520479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9613796,0.0010559377,0.00029442148,0.0005152034,0.000006095786,0.000009614889,0.0000865823,0.000010921686,0.036641784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869126,0.00014409226,0.000023251807,0.00014187428,0.0003533991,0.00064616604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998218,0.00034362305,0.00019364637,0.00010445083,0.0006377561,0.00050254393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008743948,0.0001408976,0.00032117494,0.0009271151,0.012679769,0.00411428,0.0008654416,0.0005671135,0.008820179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024345152,0.00018071164,0.00017002149,0.0025213438,0.0066049662,0.0008513457,0.0022286538,0.0016925733,0.00017076365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019981254,0.00006466758,0.12196602,0.0002868389,0.000063988715,0.00119895,0.18171854,0.0011496558,0.001805043,0.5838321,0.01752965,0.09018483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003625817,0.000044232598,0.39533046,0.0004967855,0.00006682732,0.0003233194,0.17138109,0.0012643808,0.001189826,0.017726913,0.4119937,0.0001462544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9953054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99858826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0905111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0905111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12634869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65670705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965854737","doi":"10.7202/042437ar","title":"Les droits et les obligations des époux : les régimes matrimoniaux","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Political science; Civil code; Law; Power (physics); Institution; Physics","score_opus":0.02538077201243151,"score_gpt":0.3109253890590052,"score_spread":0.2855446170465737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965854737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23803562,0.012084125,0.00236224,0.025241626,0.0003894109,0.000033621847,0.00017457223,0.000040669598,0.72163814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91549724,0.0014664866,0.0005126988,0.0013375703,0.00013105925,0.0000414322,0.000025366686,0.000014824674,0.080973335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837506,0.0006622948,0.000053478056,0.00016548042,0.00043783782,0.00030589977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992649,0.00033588338,0.00013810594,0.00005615897,0.00010342651,0.00010155217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015917942,0.00023514613,0.00012383626,0.00050004886,0.0042146775,0.0049158838,0.00046243845,0.001884173,0.0047632223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003388018,0.0001942665,0.00010561713,0.00062762876,0.0061010425,0.002339695,0.0017771054,0.0033410517,0.0005602089],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004226382,0.000019257152,0.00131817,0.000030813513,0.0000018401195,0.00017084312,0.031739555,0.00008961512,0.00033769678,0.9433146,0.0053903386,0.01754507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033492048,0.000048859638,0.020265833,0.0002731088,0.000004766919,0.00037238307,0.019459847,0.00031178852,0.0010391697,0.047117036,0.9110407,0.000032933298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038027827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061966937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038027827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049026785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032477274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07561296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966045565","doi":"10.3138/tjt.21.1.15","title":"The Meeting of the Rivers: Being Native and Christian in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spirituality; Honour; Witness; Gospel; Proclamation; Religious pluralism; Theology; Sociology; Faith; Ecumenism; Evangelism; Ecclesiology; Religious studies; Christianity; Context (archaeology); Pluralism (philosophy); Philosophy; Law; History; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.011151729410688196,"score_gpt":0.27117264867339186,"score_spread":0.26002091926270365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966045565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74909115,0.0081410445,0.00062355556,0.0779816,0.0012178908,0.00009944136,0.00028257797,0.000096186195,0.16246663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9369933,0.0028427627,0.00046000187,0.006572027,0.000053817406,0.000020921423,0.000055048535,0.00006872272,0.052933414],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969002,0.0006612354,0.000048636575,0.00028826512,0.0006822445,0.0014194524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958831,0.00047052477,0.00019777486,0.00007019659,0.00096748833,0.0024110184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019546202,0.0003385407,0.0004097465,0.00088566233,0.06336243,0.007302294,0.0022013152,0.002798282,0.0061453013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044622035,0.00040944782,0.00024664734,0.0017195188,0.013117295,0.0019214053,0.0057436554,0.005462711,0.0004005299],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000701703,0.000048661157,0.0085997,0.000117350086,0.000015364529,0.0024134573,0.9048521,0.000119083554,0.0010664696,0.025455784,0.03748729,0.019754559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036145175,0.000012531523,0.0067031463,0.0000887796,0.000006539168,0.0003258305,0.826082,0.00006355257,0.00015735111,0.0005716238,0.16594046,0.00004459047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9942597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99854136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092434496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.092434496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15139703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67066234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967928440","doi":"10.15173/russell.v29i2.2172","title":"&lt;em&gt;Marriage and Morals&lt;/em&gt; Revisited [review of Katie Roiphe, &lt;i&gt;Uncommon Arrangements&lt;/i&gt;]","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.028045053357103798,"score_gpt":0.30150143481770203,"score_spread":0.27345638146059825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967928440","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003661021,0.94504833,0.00009823151,0.0413432,0.0017325124,0.0000018957237,0.000008660574,0.0000030864774,0.011397974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037797216,0.90747035,0.00026879145,0.03139739,0.0088862525,0.000030523675,0.000028011062,0.00002881134,0.01409262],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861014,0.00079696614,0.0000519819,0.00013349402,0.00030229034,0.00010511914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758375,0.0014936386,0.00023447788,0.00007371443,0.00047533173,0.00013902494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002172736,0.00044289517,0.0007671955,0.0020382563,0.0028466661,0.004845775,0.0014823392,0.004311344,0.0043761577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050137653,0.00027848885,0.0002498404,0.004440206,0.011483359,0.0068091247,0.0018756979,0.004162007,0.0010937909],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039789367,0.000020099684,0.00044532644,0.0035208857,0.000030500874,0.00022849417,0.008755966,0.00019901515,0.00017886673,0.32793176,0.51891565,0.13973369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006197288,0.000014345806,0.0020230098,0.0039027499,0.000009756325,0.00023167802,0.00402646,0.000044841356,0.00007510725,0.021159774,0.9684895,0.000016584232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01903877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040240753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01903877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004193611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005576534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037855923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969645668","doi":"10.7202/043619ar","title":"L'incidence du refus de traitement sur le droit à l'indemnisation de la victime d'un préjudice corporel : pour une interprétation conforme au respect des libertés de conscience et de religion","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Conscience; Law","score_opus":0.0157201082136023,"score_gpt":0.2886887968353691,"score_spread":0.27296868862176676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969645668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97639763,0.00052375527,0.000537328,0.0023387012,0.00003455997,0.00003310639,0.00016187239,0.0000069368034,0.01996613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969001,0.00026035824,0.00017970828,0.00027469435,0.000011845226,0.000017591194,0.00004597192,0.000004252346,0.002305485],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938891,0.0032409378,0.00024533342,0.00047604318,0.0015614751,0.00058710313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9559508,0.02209085,0.0117578665,0.0031043522,0.005579692,0.0015163734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007968427,0.0001875485,0.0002947522,0.0011581128,0.0021145763,0.0018864574,0.0009667676,0.0011269775,0.008674075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044070832,0.00015805055,0.00028248483,0.0012789043,0.0048046014,0.0014362398,0.0019157305,0.0019957589,0.00048560597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049998367,0.00016909293,0.7845231,0.00052440056,0.00026040617,0.00076221064,0.10316173,0.00032241666,0.002279313,0.018256944,0.0034961586,0.08574421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010079693,0.00017849467,0.9308909,0.00030076012,0.0000941906,0.00036533398,0.056026213,0.00028685297,0.0010340582,0.0019360849,0.008832509,0.00004448905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11330506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19685331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11330506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025202588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023805809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22529113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969922824","doi":"10.1007/s10691-012-9198-5","title":"Comparing Women in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Situated; State (computer science); Root (linguistics); Feminism; Gender equality; Gender studies; Power (physics); Action (physics); Political science; Sociology; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07023185232347437,"score_gpt":0.3311269559579014,"score_spread":0.26089510363442703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969922824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9662484,0.0031911319,0.000112708556,0.005312506,0.00011108283,0.00007052429,0.0017812434,0.000013199384,0.023159303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98481816,0.0018064056,0.00015315077,0.0011027466,0.000019835226,0.00003549878,0.0006086952,0.000017319164,0.011438206],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.995152,0.00047024302,0.00012257385,0.00040400316,0.0011343253,0.0027168032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99459606,0.00045398268,0.0004444817,0.00008761688,0.0022733244,0.0021445064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001594423,0.000353271,0.00087605143,0.0044887466,0.018715605,0.004907326,0.0019757666,0.0016620331,0.008507054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005767668,0.00041670655,0.00068338803,0.012813166,0.0027823786,0.0011687046,0.0030706967,0.0019909476,0.000571292],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009737094,0.00034527117,0.7979702,0.00024635857,0.00020343401,0.0016964213,0.08159315,0.0006267984,0.00063182594,0.021415735,0.025981277,0.06831588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005134888,0.00011262564,0.7734575,0.00027468795,0.00007832959,0.00025790025,0.18573293,0.0003145024,0.00026351752,0.0009173982,0.038450647,0.00008863471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99775225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99920183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11650076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11650076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12906128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8452761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970048662","doi":"10.7202/042826ar","title":"The Need for a Common Perception of Human Rights in a World of Diversity: A Canadian Perspective","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020669784458363833,"score_gpt":0.2853601672289718,"score_spread":0.26469038277060797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970048662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18470193,0.016808424,0.004593715,0.15609339,0.00040781047,0.00011584005,0.00042624158,0.000041144896,0.63681155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744879,0.005283606,0.0013789419,0.002693851,0.000058007252,0.000025208246,0.000056222125,0.000016520085,0.015999768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99479693,0.0013022973,0.00012405452,0.0005389958,0.0014133446,0.001824383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99531555,0.0014505382,0.00034041228,0.00020494187,0.0015366208,0.0011518964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048894268,0.000586371,0.0006563922,0.006393759,0.027327074,0.015167502,0.002299072,0.0035420274,0.006691381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007406007,0.00031869547,0.00046978614,0.006358209,0.035516147,0.0070140734,0.004485098,0.004463318,0.00019006089],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020436468,0.000020988073,0.002822622,0.000082187995,0.000010859835,0.00026538456,0.08911212,0.00051632646,0.00016098814,0.8846234,0.0053038537,0.017060673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029887251,0.000044462577,0.036849737,0.0011282177,0.00005539334,0.000462975,0.36591858,0.0019929947,0.00029506115,0.2548318,0.3381339,0.00025693263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9911645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9915792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.158828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.158828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14849438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9756403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971605660","doi":"10.1177/000842980603500101","title":"Same-sex marriage and the Christian churches in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03906286070468124,"score_gpt":0.3317569925346837,"score_spread":0.2926941318300025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971605660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92742515,0.0052419286,0.0001532528,0.020771641,0.00015454732,0.00005098267,0.0004956522,0.000009682393,0.045697153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99023247,0.001967328,0.00010048817,0.0010607869,0.000015168654,0.000008500894,0.00009133442,0.000005032436,0.006518944],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714905,0.00026048959,0.000044862925,0.00016010922,0.0005976113,0.0017880367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949826,0.0006767067,0.00055017334,0.00009873881,0.0014082611,0.0022834956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015826139,0.00020321392,0.00046208416,0.0020624776,0.028454574,0.0036033052,0.0014561275,0.0014253312,0.006143747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005579756,0.00032072392,0.00033583917,0.004350541,0.005198817,0.0010766468,0.0028092328,0.0028896993,0.00015758525],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040359056,0.0004215193,0.45066854,0.0003526843,0.00013041233,0.0021573217,0.16319473,0.0010559808,0.0009965431,0.2380066,0.042888433,0.09972373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064973654,0.0000612006,0.65568,0.00049367803,0.00009820895,0.0004175618,0.22239016,0.0011328073,0.00044393077,0.004475512,0.11460258,0.00013942474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9988605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99973184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14408524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14408524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2018143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9927398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971887824","doi":"10.7202/042943ar","title":"Les déclarations des enfants en bas âge au sujet des abus sexuels dont ils ont été victimes: une preuve admissible par exception","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032824665751691066,"score_gpt":0.31406305825529474,"score_spread":0.28123839250360366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971887824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6322345,0.012217527,0.0043310453,0.13627005,0.0012728277,0.00013013225,0.00021939461,0.00004832978,0.21327625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95141315,0.002244383,0.0015206988,0.013071572,0.00016666237,0.000061204344,0.000036719084,0.000013155148,0.031472467],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941134,0.0025808348,0.0003439817,0.0003443352,0.0014944235,0.0011230094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98533267,0.0073798345,0.0020155413,0.0006064141,0.0036540567,0.0010114516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069259643,0.00024444106,0.0003746679,0.00067573466,0.012528976,0.004005723,0.0010817524,0.003869413,0.0025056766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016782649,0.00024411082,0.0002063845,0.0005615625,0.011200638,0.002215754,0.0031727084,0.005058858,0.00023314208],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009357927,0.000043046155,0.020741224,0.00030279276,0.000019822062,0.0036180809,0.6129698,0.00018768718,0.0020560052,0.31021655,0.016262885,0.033488497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002226122,0.00014302567,0.059350576,0.0013988354,0.000064591586,0.0025099404,0.44578487,0.00026422745,0.0024208592,0.032154605,0.45573422,0.00015207096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33005014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4999274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33005014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073665264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018081704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6562581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973265457","doi":"10.7202/043738ar","title":"La spécificité patrimoniale de l’union de fait : le libre choix et ses « dommages collatéraux »","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.014753149415898264,"score_gpt":0.27307780260166353,"score_spread":0.25832465318576525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973265457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11111272,0.0037035623,0.009082148,0.026693096,0.00059989904,0.000086740794,0.00013921365,0.000053276624,0.8485293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6779319,0.0009553357,0.0016957477,0.0024380896,0.00008056937,0.000053873846,0.000050675957,0.00003474365,0.31675908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969374,0.00058727793,0.000065616856,0.00053044653,0.0008191206,0.0010602018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865144,0.000282172,0.00011998086,0.00016236042,0.00045385925,0.00033025607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017881399,0.00036249158,0.00031572304,0.0008511786,0.016172761,0.009030869,0.0012057228,0.0032136175,0.0152337635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034586852,0.00032663843,0.00033136076,0.0011048507,0.019245803,0.002818474,0.0039482317,0.0042950604,0.0011839122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001930988,0.000008189225,0.0019538442,0.000043188335,0.000006824699,0.00027391312,0.024125392,0.00013498486,0.00038125517,0.9519717,0.008247916,0.012833459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022216604,0.000044477616,0.01701703,0.00048636436,0.000028895167,0.00050208205,0.037267618,0.0005312849,0.00096437224,0.085011974,0.8580493,0.000074365256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67865735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82677954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67865735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024554664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037414905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6464702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974818972","doi":"10.2466/pms.2001.92.2.459","title":"The Emotionality of William Blake's Poems: A Quantitative Comparison of <i>Songs of Innocence</i> with <i>Songs of Experience</i>","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Poetry; Literature; Tone (literature); Romance; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Emotionality; Art; Normative; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Communication; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04315597871166526,"score_gpt":0.35136298245395137,"score_spread":0.3082070037422861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974818972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886369,0.00020056251,0.00016958715,0.00008076739,0.000014787924,0.000007363994,0.000022497681,0.000005492858,0.010862028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984112,0.00013957512,0.00015208218,0.00003140681,0.000012806561,0.000008501698,0.000023914605,0.0000070610186,0.0012133749],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953187,0.00015832718,0.000023493385,0.000045588615,0.00018987469,0.000050871455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803084,0.0008635246,0.0004899921,0.00007154513,0.00020820551,0.00033592348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049885607,0.00013555076,0.00014289614,0.0012749679,0.0013829792,0.0018525885,0.0001484613,0.00027182864,0.0017840347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005211066,0.000109189095,0.000067421395,0.0007826411,0.0030906422,0.00094135804,0.0015029794,0.00066037284,0.00017546679],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005483005,0.00012810335,0.12812582,0.00039832806,0.00006976226,0.0013816407,0.7569345,0.00014524999,0.04378076,0.0077804094,0.0019910336,0.058716077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006769814,0.00014576732,0.7021221,0.000082527666,0.000015177373,0.0018652756,0.27417845,0.00011669118,0.0023589188,0.0009787551,0.018086715,0.000042913263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00104108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027500887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018525885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003094725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001523074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0059681535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W197505864","doi":"10.29173/alr394","title":"Role and Responsibilities of Counsel for the Child in Alberta: A Practitioner's Perspective and a Response to Professor Bala","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Children's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Best interests; BELLA; Perspective (graphical); Representation (politics); Statutory law; Best practice; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Public relations; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03463488829566423,"score_gpt":0.3583073289808248,"score_spread":0.32367244068516055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W197505864","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062365057,0.111814305,0.00021588376,0.86644834,0.003510248,0.000019733945,0.000013260652,0.000016130509,0.011725581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17044976,0.15504165,0.0018707365,0.6367269,0.0038376183,0.00007396585,0.000036492136,0.000045481036,0.03191734],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873374,0.0057649645,0.0005744844,0.00072617445,0.002889313,0.00270764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97464854,0.01584891,0.0009151596,0.0002865987,0.0041365884,0.004164119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0235636,0.00042104293,0.0011337715,0.0016190098,0.016286245,0.009507036,0.0055205696,0.023544863,0.0022858744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017488685,0.00075749966,0.00062221836,0.0034343658,0.016460113,0.0034469261,0.004609474,0.019440606,0.0002801191],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000769308,0.00013343764,0.0060771825,0.0015393266,0.00004853743,0.006495267,0.06262504,0.00078825286,0.0007901491,0.24183083,0.5756558,0.10393922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004109019,0.00009122605,0.006739369,0.0026494223,0.000058947564,0.0017391184,0.062460784,0.00018027257,0.00023391139,0.013160723,0.91252095,0.00012415335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.759203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90790683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9462172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053782847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17354667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48443013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975190149","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100009121","title":"Civil Liability for Sexual Assault in Aboriginal Residential Schools: The Baker Did It","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Redress; Tort; Damages; Harm; Credibility; Criminology; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Sexual abuse; Liability; Legal liability; Psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.023280338798985153,"score_gpt":0.3146918399281752,"score_spread":0.29141150112919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975190149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8009243,0.010825415,0.00023488354,0.086356774,0.0003887376,0.00008814822,0.000072110364,0.000006313366,0.10110333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97480565,0.006432066,0.000116877854,0.0025895357,0.00013280472,0.000025959322,0.000021568332,0.000003295011,0.015872316],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981541,0.000723519,0.0000986685,0.00008531509,0.00045317874,0.00048517867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99411607,0.0019328074,0.0013530042,0.00022391937,0.0012745087,0.0010996867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031496345,0.0001794027,0.00022234068,0.0017174681,0.0070454944,0.0026626445,0.0008208632,0.0018919692,0.008568642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013849171,0.00030569322,0.00021492278,0.0012057412,0.0056990264,0.002001178,0.0025420503,0.002568817,0.0004558127],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007239545,0.00019586772,0.26662847,0.00047517006,0.000024442426,0.0043437025,0.54049987,0.00011078147,0.0002772334,0.08690581,0.022091564,0.07837459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068193513,0.00007964715,0.13896279,0.0011373963,0.000031856413,0.001290145,0.79498583,0.00008652628,0.00013111786,0.004695726,0.05856659,0.000025417485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25945282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44590077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7405472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016521597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51588523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976097333","doi":"10.7202/1028051ar","title":"A Practitioner's Guide to The Economic Implications of Custody and Access under the Divorce Act and the Federal Child Support Guidelines","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child support; Child custody; Section (typography); Context (archaeology); Family law; Child protection; Law; Psychology; Political science; Business; Geography","score_opus":0.05251865639040878,"score_gpt":0.36195296818000305,"score_spread":0.3094343117895943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976097333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016160039,0.17417318,0.055166863,0.18775418,0.009683128,0.0029770492,0.025056865,0.0021007063,0.541472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015431764,0.23441134,0.107775494,0.08339285,0.0046120035,0.0038336245,0.0117464345,0.0012323131,0.53756416],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99577904,0.0011081886,0.00044792893,0.00021496908,0.002113657,0.00033626804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989016,0.0062067113,0.00041188032,0.00035318025,0.0037092357,0.00030303304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005704076,0.0015300915,0.0012519868,0.00882992,0.0037165529,0.003839342,0.0032405714,0.007818334,0.03680341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018769337,0.0017442137,0.000932099,0.013650748,0.003440938,0.003681112,0.0016655268,0.006385549,0.019130012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046649297,0.00003517436,0.00022288025,0.00023329623,0.0000021715093,0.00014775836,0.00059479015,0.00029429005,0.00010950027,0.029611988,0.9155717,0.053171683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039199167,0.000009349668,0.0010672093,0.00093613565,0.0000023529676,0.00014047467,0.0006116777,0.00015272496,0.000027346376,0.009545306,0.9874829,0.00002060352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4272156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55119836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5727844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012391315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031262144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84945786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976724405","doi":"10.7202/043562ar","title":"Les sources des droits ancestraux des peuples autochtones","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03916705989347929,"score_gpt":0.3048308721326693,"score_spread":0.26566381223919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976724405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74186605,0.0033243003,0.004122832,0.0029364785,0.000073473486,0.000049617214,0.0014948499,0.000029063163,0.24610327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9377545,0.0018931701,0.0010832832,0.0003377827,0.00003930213,0.000032273878,0.0004556947,0.00002068927,0.058383215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990984,0.00014518297,0.000032424836,0.00017466559,0.00035117968,0.00019815414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985979,0.00045119683,0.00026795777,0.00014042144,0.00042141284,0.000121044046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009065843,0.00017997633,0.00030016244,0.0016252301,0.0036621145,0.0027033852,0.00041457842,0.00040459447,0.00867578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027058213,0.0001377581,0.00014802183,0.0021720186,0.002152575,0.0005598985,0.0012907223,0.0009755359,0.00043239316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084596795,0.000030710486,0.123709,0.00021738121,0.000110090645,0.0023273895,0.079729654,0.0006924349,0.0021664517,0.69232905,0.004889529,0.093713716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025360232,0.00005569143,0.46516502,0.0007101463,0.00015449364,0.0019822796,0.035246126,0.00077206455,0.0028677175,0.056470674,0.43645865,0.00009183647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26120383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5642539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26120383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005446761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006175924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51936686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977077970","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0017","title":"Granovsky v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) : Adding Insult to Injury?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insult; Immigration; Political science; Law; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01984727827338229,"score_gpt":0.26385912846239407,"score_spread":0.24401185018901178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977077970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08039592,0.03078859,0.0010475853,0.3835855,0.00438863,0.000082376086,0.00043178763,0.00008054125,0.49919912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56606656,0.013007453,0.00079240446,0.22194597,0.0008775762,0.000048865502,0.0001771241,0.000090111374,0.19699395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940679,0.00039501535,0.000098950404,0.00035997495,0.0017576803,0.003320547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981463,0.00040500803,0.00010001518,0.000056388853,0.0007083679,0.00058397267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018966916,0.0002923562,0.00037064496,0.0011517692,0.029098805,0.009500805,0.0024579698,0.010000263,0.0057402747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005681019,0.0004078471,0.00045174581,0.0015505353,0.012242705,0.0022173729,0.0040531964,0.010393659,0.0004977479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079231984,0.00002917137,0.0080480445,0.0001273355,0.000022494707,0.0018922583,0.02530024,0.00030295626,0.0004343607,0.7339883,0.19642335,0.033352315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003622256,0.00003122556,0.0143332435,0.0008132262,0.000058873855,0.0004804642,0.029613744,0.00017297058,0.00053176127,0.027917404,0.9258909,0.00011985985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9884666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08249721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08249721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18903065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59856194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977854395","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402240460","title":"Natural Law Modernized. By David Braybrooke. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001. 351p. $70.00.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Natural law; Natural (archaeology); Postmodernism; Utilitarianism; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.02961032787433917,"score_gpt":0.3285258358194835,"score_spread":0.2989155079451444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977854395","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023348663,0.9046741,0.00064470683,0.03450269,0.002897455,0.000016536127,0.00064239174,0.00013135377,0.056257244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0134372385,0.7398519,0.001780876,0.0076256087,0.0029654827,0.00006932972,0.0008594761,0.00024250131,0.23316766],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922276,0.00014884013,0.000065498374,0.0001044308,0.00036956416,0.00008880915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870193,0.0004271028,0.00020140034,0.00010077064,0.0003570722,0.00021172823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012253877,0.0016132494,0.0008453642,0.00328913,0.0018533716,0.0039840424,0.0013085708,0.0028272886,0.065089785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025042086,0.0019271574,0.00046107025,0.00785838,0.003992394,0.006383262,0.001904083,0.0046687773,0.023451155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012925506,0.0000069863995,0.00012093245,0.00056807423,0.00000850147,0.000058689748,0.0005811629,0.00011438861,0.00007342371,0.018904513,0.9377595,0.041790802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004564324,0.000003062423,0.0009948881,0.000547431,0.000006237805,0.000088426525,0.00027420957,0.000039975464,0.000018452894,0.0049824053,0.99303234,0.000008072567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2656382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51092905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2656382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013433746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009402538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52818406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977865709","doi":"10.5539/ass.v10n10p182","title":"Counselors’ Spiritual Competence in Malaysia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Ethnic group; Psychology; Descriptive research; Descriptive statistics; Social psychology; Medical education; Sociology; Social science; Medicine","score_opus":0.02205455394863166,"score_gpt":0.3104775698394054,"score_spread":0.28842301589077374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977865709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8559507,0.12554711,0.00024154077,0.0032339098,0.00007315484,0.00003094158,0.00014202388,0.000011909058,0.014768674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9420457,0.056200046,0.00037583485,0.00023101774,0.000023854058,0.00001284684,0.00004814357,0.0000018319414,0.0010607694],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993369,0.00024149253,0.000076748176,0.000038371618,0.00025063398,0.000055788754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987826,0.0003927868,0.00037347493,0.000018803432,0.00020370282,0.0002286035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001068464,0.000069873895,0.00015213585,0.0009111684,0.00042381484,0.0007981217,0.00019150761,0.00021874413,0.0010616711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026419645,0.000076613345,0.00010088163,0.0007389836,0.00031534367,0.00044611096,0.0004008741,0.0003023882,0.000081469516],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007906876,0.00028034797,0.3486797,0.0051560323,0.000106087995,0.0014248898,0.015466772,0.0002995273,0.0018394579,0.0015846604,0.004770795,0.62031263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009963837,0.00035751515,0.90011114,0.0053154156,0.000074396994,0.0043139863,0.030361645,0.00020098436,0.0009405854,0.00025904278,0.058020703,0.000034726603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011873518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030278854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011873518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096152065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030282582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023608804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977892117","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100010206","title":"Multidimensionality and the Matrix: Identifying Charter Violations in Cases of Complex Subordination","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Privilege (computing); Charter; Subordination (linguistics); Sociology; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisdiction; Law; Law and economics; Epistemology; Computer science; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03651887711052631,"score_gpt":0.3207720655731241,"score_spread":0.2842531884625978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977892117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9377219,0.0012689189,0.013641032,0.0063768574,0.00008410381,0.00037057756,0.00014776792,0.00003502336,0.040353898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996345,0.00015840381,0.0028764445,0.000093247254,0.000007983513,0.00006262409,0.000030352507,0.0000063812386,0.00041961865],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825873,0.008863206,0.000970015,0.0010120579,0.0045608296,0.0020066465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96369684,0.018288003,0.011310928,0.0017046081,0.0033297336,0.0016698724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013856929,0.00042458883,0.0005800425,0.015599785,0.009479487,0.012037493,0.0016177947,0.0020184107,0.0029086417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049286176,0.0004738916,0.00036543407,0.015462157,0.023651132,0.008712954,0.012389272,0.0029929597,0.00014052996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001112558,0.00008565119,0.12152938,0.00024166597,0.000031215182,0.0034193706,0.57309693,0.0010345748,0.0011393343,0.2527566,0.00277186,0.04378214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016194732,0.00007299339,0.11114105,0.0008839237,0.000028464494,0.0027490377,0.7403902,0.008203108,0.000936379,0.10235609,0.033071157,0.00015145382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08158615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13753538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9184139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0150899235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011848575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16222256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978852772","doi":"10.7202/043053ar","title":"Les personnes morales dans le droit privé du Québec","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.01473975786034105,"score_gpt":0.24794799836910028,"score_spread":0.23320824050875924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978852772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9478332,0.0010434315,0.00048638834,0.0050867563,0.000029365128,0.000011356561,0.00012370317,0.000008148439,0.045377687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986552,0.0003142895,0.00010800817,0.00017934541,0.0000040531713,0.000005231266,0.000023049313,0.0000029144162,0.012811154],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989471,0.00035567922,0.00001767829,0.000087704255,0.00027128487,0.00032060547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986986,0.00023757153,0.00018885858,0.00005272788,0.00048996625,0.0003323003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012308722,0.00015545495,0.00022917193,0.00087079586,0.010291429,0.0035718782,0.000558316,0.0010200032,0.0058047636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023946124,0.00016480533,0.00014222474,0.0011055314,0.0058363546,0.001262125,0.0011483944,0.0016527852,0.00022810722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008178595,0.00010332651,0.1558855,0.00010615306,0.000059714854,0.0010542284,0.60842717,0.0016503321,0.0018398778,0.15751041,0.01584484,0.057436638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010222212,0.00005147162,0.4928118,0.00024803207,0.00003416616,0.00039500452,0.3487821,0.0013719181,0.00039457792,0.007270949,0.14853258,0.00009717517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97793967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9871293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03168563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03168563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022175305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22989643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978944960","doi":"10.1353/vcr.2009.0039","title":"Religious Experience and the New Woman: The Life of Lily Dougall (review)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victorian review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Publishing; Religious studies; History; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024523308663296862,"score_gpt":0.3268460889009632,"score_spread":0.30232278023766634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978944960","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000041698662,0.99629956,0.0000081781545,0.001983228,0.00090396375,0.0000028337329,0.000011120538,0.0000021101434,0.00074726413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011457974,0.9910795,0.000037412236,0.0038325547,0.0017919989,0.000013237801,0.0000376925,0.0000030882848,0.0020586986],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994679,0.00013104157,0.000060570852,0.000079088684,0.00021972808,0.000041749645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896204,0.00036555683,0.00025730257,0.000019419354,0.00026176556,0.00013393773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007153214,0.0009746077,0.0010798208,0.0019358738,0.0006008275,0.0026298938,0.00084448705,0.0015052861,0.009149633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030204512,0.00031067507,0.0003270223,0.0040241596,0.0009731626,0.0022584521,0.0012049531,0.0028076023,0.002544638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007094647,0.000022335094,0.0005054012,0.02101889,0.00006613014,0.00022810383,0.0007346518,0.000043575543,0.00018924977,0.001480142,0.627123,0.34851763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012483018,0.00003483391,0.0020589537,0.017501768,0.00005975015,0.0010138948,0.00074137433,0.000012023821,0.00003771699,0.00027419356,0.9782317,0.00002128731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011112378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022637697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011112378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014038379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032033494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030608594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979613786","doi":"10.7202/043278ar","title":"L'adoption d'un enfant contre la volonté de ses parents","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.011178437272037442,"score_gpt":0.26848013839938856,"score_spread":0.2573017011273511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979613786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5801786,0.012214866,0.013406768,0.05567185,0.002730148,0.00035796996,0.00023040579,0.00013040876,0.33507904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8254879,0.006897728,0.0064890618,0.008800291,0.00024197133,0.00017653502,0.00013326883,0.000032007923,0.1517413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977374,0.0009607002,0.00006598175,0.00023103898,0.0005603552,0.0004445547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970361,0.0005979118,0.0005316422,0.00029202463,0.0009957611,0.00054650387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023468875,0.0004100644,0.00030382237,0.0003021035,0.00531982,0.0026626368,0.00089965685,0.0014784927,0.0076637887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006034134,0.00020566808,0.0004093204,0.00030610734,0.0033913995,0.0010252031,0.0023772325,0.0020673058,0.0010596456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032140355,0.0002832981,0.08762514,0.00075152016,0.00013892182,0.014465123,0.22056027,0.00043713508,0.008769809,0.31928724,0.04606356,0.30129665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044396857,0.0004653064,0.06739667,0.0015374798,0.00015650186,0.009268918,0.068956934,0.00047734173,0.0027774367,0.010598023,0.8382033,0.000117712974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18069091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33658034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18069091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056249313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013267812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35927838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980260806","doi":"10.1017/cls.2013.2","title":"Public Reason and the Disempowerment of Aboriginal People in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Normative; Ambivalence; Politics; Sociology; Political philosophy; Space (punctuation); Political science; Epistemology; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013089511489178541,"score_gpt":0.24951517919449764,"score_spread":0.23642566770531911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980260806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9572132,0.0010829745,0.000109289846,0.01564525,0.000087912216,0.000031022086,0.00008835651,0.000006259666,0.025735715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952667,0.00036879125,0.000039627266,0.0006586634,0.0000071330537,0.0000048462853,0.000019208748,0.000003910243,0.0036311422],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99492764,0.00053539005,0.00008192593,0.00027053186,0.0014155181,0.0027689626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99528354,0.0007481345,0.000574505,0.00013774025,0.001502487,0.0017534904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025281913,0.00023549347,0.0005647907,0.0017707119,0.041577667,0.006503068,0.001622743,0.0020212922,0.004399714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061114603,0.0003274869,0.0003734042,0.0028839936,0.012721204,0.0012502464,0.0055395127,0.0050545493,0.00015956024],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053215783,0.000087748886,0.07043473,0.00006364505,0.000024863508,0.0013842845,0.8654004,0.00013349058,0.00047715683,0.038890384,0.008378269,0.0146718165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012979191,0.000026244528,0.09577801,0.00015602377,0.00003205012,0.00033136274,0.8434088,0.00026998163,0.00021603328,0.003654592,0.056038,0.0000758948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11237284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11237284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15864296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81532586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W198097382","doi":"","title":"Reform of the Law Relating to Unincorporated Nonprofit Associations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Voluntary association; Corporate law; Business; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.027887554189181863,"score_gpt":0.29006288957273835,"score_spread":0.2621753353835565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W198097382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06539026,0.0067483163,0.013126187,0.11513491,0.0021340747,0.00042496063,0.00041203963,0.00031214018,0.7963171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6577389,0.00683503,0.007295699,0.058240123,0.0007769694,0.00020773485,0.00027217105,0.00010064981,0.26853278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98589176,0.0013575733,0.00040245362,0.0011378108,0.006463761,0.004746626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907506,0.0026570747,0.000520847,0.00067569467,0.0041861534,0.0012095657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00515932,0.00039702872,0.00044527723,0.0016753802,0.015141618,0.011527313,0.004416703,0.006696615,0.0037571497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017833397,0.0005336051,0.0007076143,0.0024673925,0.01917749,0.0034887418,0.003917999,0.009050977,0.000627965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051945553,0.000020112266,0.0015284838,0.000026641372,0.000004307846,0.00030586036,0.003882794,0.00042105687,0.0001330903,0.95759577,0.02672328,0.009353514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032649914,0.000033920987,0.009216013,0.00056664477,0.000047081834,0.00036770303,0.009244829,0.0023627477,0.00091268815,0.07618119,0.9009397,0.00009491148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94444513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9660701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94444513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08729203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20118287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63335097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983194792","doi":"10.1163/157181109x394353","title":"Restless Spirits in the Land: Finding a Place in Canadian Law for Aboriginal Civil Disobedience","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal on Minority and Group Rights","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Civil disobedience; Law; Constitution; Political science; State (computer science); Interim; Supreme court; Original intent; Action (physics); Notice; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.023638458514971452,"score_gpt":0.3469895918262996,"score_spread":0.3233511333113282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983194792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16724737,0.0048223683,0.0053469236,0.11983407,0.0008907503,0.00023268785,0.00014284838,0.00009075789,0.7013923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94276106,0.0011506255,0.002678828,0.009334677,0.000059796563,0.000042417683,0.000026149357,0.00003664942,0.04390976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99370736,0.0010895587,0.00018471153,0.0005942908,0.0022614957,0.0021626467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923814,0.0023172821,0.00045347706,0.00045097267,0.002881963,0.0015149391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057490147,0.00026766726,0.00038037467,0.0017486231,0.040765107,0.010602268,0.0027973827,0.0046621696,0.008016839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011571591,0.00037755244,0.00042887492,0.0018126466,0.040987425,0.0035291873,0.0055827596,0.0069182804,0.00035578493],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015962285,0.00002520996,0.0030266366,0.00006204173,0.0000064947,0.00071588374,0.09599411,0.0001963821,0.0004312776,0.86536413,0.01904659,0.015115322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003079554,0.00003949933,0.012963547,0.0006465296,0.000052380787,0.00043537986,0.16057728,0.0010631374,0.00073820824,0.06581006,0.7574292,0.0002139178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9906088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1102795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1102795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20589758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8001375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984198735","doi":"10.3138/md.47.3.446","title":"Traumatizing Romanticism in Brian Friel's <i>Faith Healer</i>","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Drama","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Romanticism; Faith; Literature; Psychic; Allusion; Intertextuality; Philosophy; Art; History; Epistemology","score_opus":0.034419382826045224,"score_gpt":0.3010543044388367,"score_spread":0.26663492161279145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984198735","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14217818,0.012535359,0.0040878546,0.25372854,0.0028000579,0.000036487487,0.00005031855,0.00018372526,0.5843995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91376954,0.0021097544,0.0009538263,0.019042963,0.00040217835,0.000039950093,0.000010544532,0.00013961198,0.06353165],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979715,0.0013584957,0.000019402503,0.00008601114,0.00027891804,0.00028575197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881554,0.0006845025,0.00014546874,0.000052452375,0.00011730911,0.0001847444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015838403,0.00028416904,0.0002662648,0.000669192,0.015058703,0.0064760386,0.00079314876,0.0025430059,0.0034433438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003170084,0.0002143843,0.00020798025,0.00045944293,0.02335932,0.0031922085,0.004067083,0.0060200226,0.0005340081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037891212,0.00003619586,0.00049175206,0.00006715056,0.000005316554,0.001186343,0.4690817,0.000089907095,0.00048430893,0.4253177,0.0946243,0.008577372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013233058,0.000032166776,0.0009118871,0.00023764608,0.0000053129543,0.001341585,0.25763625,0.00017625882,0.00061593635,0.025909405,0.713088,0.000032373093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024932861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056226213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024932861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050334856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018311553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049575448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984515512","doi":"10.7202/043175ar","title":"Towards an Integrated, Liberal Theory of the Canadian State","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Institution; Politics; Law and economics; Power (physics); Political science; Perspective (graphical); Conflation; Public sphere; Law; Sociology; Political philosophy; Action (physics); State action; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013415764495506268,"score_gpt":0.2591743925655902,"score_spread":0.24575862807008395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984515512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01813284,0.0031490054,0.038065664,0.039711226,0.00031595834,0.00007003357,0.0001642671,0.0000865588,0.9003045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8969466,0.003422291,0.018990058,0.004419188,0.00018692935,0.00011976787,0.00012287873,0.00007176468,0.07572051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709356,0.00070708053,0.000044349,0.00025416253,0.0013198054,0.00058104366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988393,0.0002711943,0.000069351125,0.00009269,0.00051099487,0.00021648587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021373518,0.00055773836,0.000440647,0.002898587,0.011954276,0.011088484,0.002373637,0.0019406833,0.00473478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026302438,0.00028773278,0.0003920431,0.003757516,0.03269261,0.0045501143,0.0034662834,0.0041855616,0.0003733485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.8025165e-7,0.0000011375911,0.00006711474,0.0000032846478,3.9297487e-7,0.000006027684,0.0012193822,0.00011936745,0.000008373712,0.9971414,0.0005078139,0.0009249335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070693036,0.00000667319,0.0011049655,0.00010150506,0.000009880552,0.000033185323,0.006938051,0.002394823,0.00009892286,0.8086951,0.18058468,0.000025254705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9453878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9508908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.898595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.101405054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09439669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73574865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985488337","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100006189","title":"Judicial Notice: The Very Texture of Legal Reasoning","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Notice; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Legal doctrine; Principal (computer security); Judicial opinion; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.013593595124143883,"score_gpt":0.26540533452861653,"score_spread":0.25181173940447266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985488337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05536556,0.008524064,0.036888495,0.1385381,0.001200831,0.00005559599,0.00013931173,0.00014861808,0.7591395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870064,0.001165882,0.0017448366,0.0018063906,0.0003291367,0.0000112415355,0.000018644141,0.00003523752,0.007882318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910608,0.003240044,0.0002462722,0.000850661,0.0032971445,0.0013049858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98568153,0.008524421,0.0008518838,0.0012739695,0.002758573,0.0009095572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009875075,0.0002329179,0.0004726987,0.0026899367,0.010691221,0.014937442,0.0018259586,0.0038056418,0.0063759233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03181244,0.00037559646,0.0003644422,0.0024992812,0.08456159,0.008173347,0.0049271467,0.006173253,0.00044307695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007293761,0.0000021811884,0.00015679782,0.000011705602,0.0000018002193,0.000042542004,0.005479767,0.00007401295,0.00008095527,0.9876374,0.00200991,0.0044956286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021397338,0.000011888261,0.0010702818,0.00019793992,0.0000131637735,0.000102176244,0.007438139,0.00052406563,0.00023948518,0.88003194,0.11032041,0.000029091278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19382647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16508281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19382647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019490303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38539654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985954621","doi":"10.3138/ecf.26.2.165","title":"Ideal Friendship and the Paradoxes of Narration in Sarah Fielding’s <i>David Simple</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Ideal (ethics); Character (mathematics); Narrative; Adventure; Skepticism; Simple (philosophy); Power (physics); Aesthetics; Literature; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Art; Art history; Social science","score_opus":0.016305513343385467,"score_gpt":0.2695140332003083,"score_spread":0.25320851985692283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985954621","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24152,0.031854417,0.014206737,0.26116052,0.0047533065,0.00006413705,0.000112093985,0.00017068736,0.44615814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97759765,0.0016163413,0.001064565,0.0054355823,0.0007188495,0.000030184934,0.000012829159,0.00004260084,0.013481418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538594,0.0038076919,0.00006448844,0.0002412159,0.00030566964,0.00019502279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942069,0.004580269,0.00038513602,0.00024050822,0.00029471167,0.00029233514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038082297,0.00038995128,0.0002647831,0.00089222915,0.010029911,0.008211771,0.0008436027,0.0028227055,0.0022640938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008116789,0.00028337742,0.00021180093,0.00047447783,0.030904002,0.008161057,0.004084895,0.0038101731,0.00038058538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005683804,0.000022503891,0.0003220816,0.00008885501,0.00000776845,0.000627031,0.42613804,0.00009741751,0.00025774958,0.53979206,0.02640061,0.0061890935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003391988,0.000050466548,0.00058235315,0.0003359012,0.000009905206,0.0017277114,0.22600733,0.00039394555,0.0009195968,0.18710694,0.5827864,0.000045575773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026674592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037623185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010029911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035002788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000778892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025396466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986750507","doi":"10.1007/s10780-014-9209-3","title":"Freedom of Conscience and Catholic Schools","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interchange","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Bible College","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Charter; Alliance; Academic freedom; Freedom of thought; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Political science; Sociology; Freedom of religion; Higher education; Human rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05821436567191625,"score_gpt":0.3273957715885819,"score_spread":0.2691814059166657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986750507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29086813,0.001674665,0.0018070408,0.029217646,0.00021469078,0.00005128273,0.000028309349,0.000015724521,0.6761225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99037725,0.00012621425,0.00014124074,0.00081225164,0.00005867163,0.000019270527,0.000006450751,0.000005528,0.008453141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927946,0.0041712867,0.00015284358,0.000417538,0.000581413,0.0018823682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989856,0.005466253,0.000971197,0.0009705581,0.0005399414,0.002196046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008178826,0.00029193284,0.0006311141,0.0022105123,0.025051262,0.0093976185,0.0013703946,0.004951619,0.010677395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014256902,0.0003847646,0.00039870327,0.0024798634,0.066893995,0.0064439187,0.009012475,0.008657333,0.00036361435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008880865,0.000033764216,0.0005056365,0.0000045986703,9.947372e-7,0.00003062077,0.01206331,0.000021306401,0.000009909427,0.98543316,0.0004952597,0.0013925834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080079684,0.00002949512,0.0037276172,0.000100059624,0.000008134072,0.00010367036,0.039737366,0.00017551653,0.000070554124,0.92839974,0.027546221,0.000021439726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023278644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043425854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025051262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009065196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011614243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06577289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990377031","doi":"10.7202/037461ar","title":"L’affaire Bruker c. Marcovitz : variations sur un thème","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013544744474243055,"score_gpt":0.2539082478714212,"score_spread":0.24036350339717813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990377031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04570601,0.080025345,0.004730894,0.4171964,0.009657337,0.00007402019,0.00028653006,0.00009933156,0.44222417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6174569,0.022444626,0.001832935,0.048851892,0.0027191753,0.00009908318,0.00010599491,0.0001973086,0.30629206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965939,0.0009033563,0.000082945786,0.00053945574,0.0012036087,0.00067677884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986532,0.0005808053,0.00012154921,0.000053866093,0.000391232,0.00019933432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018772876,0.00052713184,0.00037517722,0.0009057689,0.013481347,0.008018651,0.0014920428,0.0049887486,0.0055746096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046471013,0.00031232924,0.00029684245,0.0014230798,0.013599641,0.0027916383,0.002821401,0.0072296145,0.0007727757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025376978,0.000010432057,0.00074858847,0.000067793764,0.0000066602483,0.00027538504,0.026862111,0.000117748656,0.00034808347,0.8687594,0.08910946,0.013669001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004005632,0.00000794465,0.001333175,0.00018737261,0.00000543492,0.00012708844,0.0077808285,0.00012822883,0.00047537067,0.016432922,0.9734849,0.000032659813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.548206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5935443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.548206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028259013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022064961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90890944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990658214","doi":"10.1017/s0020589300064642","title":"Constitutional Challenges to Sexual Orientation Discrimination","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Statutory law; Lesbian; Legislation; Same sex; Law; Political science; Convention; Human rights; Legislature; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.0891685153541418,"score_gpt":0.3677277836966911,"score_spread":0.2785592683425493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990658214","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018260937,0.009146278,0.0044090184,0.63338083,0.004914553,0.00007279829,0.0002119692,0.000051983792,0.32955164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43125746,0.009004402,0.004823267,0.43668362,0.012164825,0.0005186169,0.00031609274,0.00010425114,0.10512745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.987452,0.003557302,0.00064531894,0.0020719818,0.004444633,0.0018288002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880342,0.0076616057,0.0006075516,0.0009587776,0.0013943022,0.0013436159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021562444,0.0004267388,0.000724389,0.001290665,0.013222051,0.014220005,0.004268046,0.02267361,0.01013684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031108988,0.0006546767,0.00085222995,0.0016657638,0.032158982,0.008834469,0.0103571685,0.02316047,0.0013898641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004994357,0.000015113457,0.00013235018,0.000015092027,0.000002002264,0.00007411275,0.0009135502,0.00004971559,0.000076806806,0.9818029,0.012525836,0.0043876115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043684606,0.000034047636,0.0005988454,0.00035239977,0.000009807721,0.00024060656,0.0025059562,0.00018017196,0.00020749496,0.5757808,0.4200159,0.000030354302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017189061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01756629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02267361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008644431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012593923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114034474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990757294","doi":"10.1177/000842980403300106","title":"The Presbyterian Church in Canada and the Pope: One denomination's struggle with its confessional history","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confessional; Confession (law); Faith; Offensive; Church history; Theology; Law; Religious studies; History; Political science; Philosophy; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.052109918776653885,"score_gpt":0.3228595612782456,"score_spread":0.2707496425015917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990757294","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81624234,0.014436008,0.00037234716,0.06083861,0.00031974673,0.000028549583,0.000089909256,0.00001737749,0.107655086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849539,0.0029057025,0.00013457357,0.0018789622,0.000024504041,0.000005398302,0.000016847422,0.000009773777,0.010070225],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838376,0.00031738883,0.00001709079,0.00008102338,0.00033730426,0.00086334447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981667,0.000339766,0.000121893856,0.0000509485,0.00051163003,0.0008091258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001184109,0.00022830437,0.0003220009,0.001107435,0.04322585,0.0075725564,0.0014420863,0.0016169639,0.0029757032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002804724,0.00021382984,0.00016538211,0.0024444945,0.021331172,0.001811542,0.004320073,0.0033177019,0.0001286364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103522165,0.000062983025,0.02241173,0.00012969256,0.000026732627,0.0017758851,0.7166493,0.00017924118,0.00055878336,0.18072255,0.021304592,0.05607495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010034222,0.000020524936,0.03287955,0.00021898278,0.000022281796,0.0003051775,0.7484171,0.00010823915,0.00024780037,0.003871922,0.21384896,0.000049493858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99175113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09624675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09624675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12630288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6983223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991481877","doi":"10.7202/043249ar","title":"Réflexions fiscales sur la famille","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.01593386171021422,"score_gpt":0.27000778522499497,"score_spread":0.25407392351478075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991481877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05955117,0.031464156,0.0027684881,0.20857385,0.001608165,0.000033790413,0.0010546352,0.00008432234,0.69486153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70043063,0.019629208,0.0021845151,0.012780007,0.0007783741,0.00006776489,0.00041137583,0.00007974885,0.26363847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766564,0.0005939811,0.00006815176,0.0002268082,0.00067098014,0.00077440566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973937,0.0006645008,0.00024749184,0.00010497939,0.0010996884,0.0004895091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027482584,0.00037346332,0.0003051487,0.0023661894,0.008358782,0.0065193176,0.00080309506,0.0017538888,0.020058868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073464075,0.00027235164,0.0002258042,0.0028241058,0.005702629,0.0034742993,0.0029415356,0.002780158,0.0011273318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051899737,0.000017078195,0.004172215,0.000070117625,0.0000124164435,0.00019606698,0.011891157,0.00030718,0.00009081279,0.86791646,0.07953443,0.035740122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012398803,0.000013856884,0.0070245746,0.00039751502,0.000010727548,0.0001066897,0.0130971465,0.00012639604,0.00009685162,0.0396682,0.93942577,0.000019944418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6974579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7968516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6974579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039799012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03556567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6086476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992897212","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.26.1.23","title":"Race Matters: Sexism, Indigenous Sovereignty, and <i>McIvor</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Indigenous; Injustice; Transformative learning; Gender studies; Race (biology); Sociology; Colonialism; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Racism; Economic Justice; Dominance (genetics); Law; Politics","score_opus":0.019065747396475985,"score_gpt":0.25121861528699324,"score_spread":0.23215286789051726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992897212","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17442621,0.029037429,0.0009029382,0.27029023,0.0007976891,0.0000333038,0.000045990244,0.000016951633,0.52444935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9542149,0.0039053408,0.00019868888,0.017706683,0.00033421308,0.000024122137,0.00000826705,0.000009928694,0.023597984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778724,0.0009652368,0.000032934164,0.00018335879,0.00035689693,0.0006742753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990132,0.00045403402,0.00012654289,0.000040754985,0.000141376,0.00022403467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023357836,0.00023782204,0.00026909506,0.0008432889,0.019720705,0.0076561337,0.0011598185,0.0033871667,0.0027768908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024806315,0.00018172868,0.00026279647,0.0007286199,0.0452673,0.003865023,0.003959552,0.0039210483,0.0001218709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000939227,0.000017865532,0.0017398585,0.000036594087,0.0000045890097,0.00034893642,0.1324839,0.000030234423,0.00009598452,0.8508634,0.008727696,0.005641587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020941978,0.000041694235,0.013115365,0.0008755762,0.00003820237,0.000540952,0.35479778,0.00018712257,0.00048532104,0.23172845,0.3981138,0.000054803895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51341975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6168397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48658025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013836764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015230338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9788917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994521795","doi":"10.7202/043620ar","title":"L'encadrement législatif des rapports pécuniaires entre époux : un grand ménage s'impose pour les nouveaux ménages","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.015807636541542977,"score_gpt":0.2570886389436978,"score_spread":0.24128100240215483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994521795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71176976,0.004515307,0.0037510523,0.0352932,0.0002556248,0.000077766235,0.00032988095,0.000060796403,0.24394658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90316683,0.0009459993,0.0008365087,0.0015770828,0.000062281804,0.000045971618,0.00005208437,0.000019370184,0.09329398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751055,0.0008692781,0.000048529495,0.0002727672,0.00068478525,0.00061400497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732566,0.00090429693,0.000465789,0.00016647672,0.0006508094,0.00048693473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028434221,0.00018479902,0.00021824082,0.00078726077,0.007925619,0.0037845748,0.0007633119,0.0014605675,0.012611795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004948639,0.00025946827,0.00015421744,0.0008143267,0.005981963,0.0014189037,0.0018579193,0.0019199976,0.0007470972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008728105,0.00009283216,0.04142048,0.00027284212,0.000038489256,0.0005477821,0.11378661,0.00052266446,0.0034928306,0.7179421,0.0231958,0.09860026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002917147,0.00013197438,0.23070279,0.0005575921,0.000041687686,0.00032389152,0.055387825,0.0007310896,0.0028000285,0.010236654,0.69897026,0.000087030545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45763236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7166667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45763236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012157009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021319365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90993726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994861759","doi":"10.1179/003962611x12894696204821","title":"TSILHQOT'IN NATION v. BRITISH COLUMBIA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Survey Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Gazi Üniversitesi","keywords":"Statutory law; Jurisprudence; Law; Common law; Order (exchange); Political science; High Court; Foundation (evidence); Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.17413079094661135,"score_gpt":0.3510488529002058,"score_spread":0.17691806195359447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994861759","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015981248,0.66487193,0.00036482126,0.021243764,0.0013684862,0.00028085522,0.004345311,0.000059093312,0.2914844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19587064,0.6798123,0.000960504,0.016531533,0.00022951157,0.0003362528,0.002779297,0.000033732314,0.10344619],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998293,0.0002544474,0.00010236922,0.00009922438,0.0009772389,0.00027376175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972281,0.00080338604,0.00021668996,0.000047451762,0.0015282292,0.0001761536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012847626,0.0002924705,0.00047464904,0.0036405742,0.0032234185,0.0032208734,0.0008401741,0.0010870524,0.007020646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049339635,0.00020127151,0.000398372,0.010155325,0.0009760351,0.0008167544,0.0006796048,0.0010772081,0.00063998264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012466781,0.000057703102,0.008555133,0.020441946,0.00017361515,0.0008648844,0.004814996,0.00030108122,0.00066736597,0.055821188,0.4379728,0.4702047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022036636,0.000030252939,0.027907902,0.009636615,0.00020939547,0.00014405078,0.0025007043,0.00005856642,0.00032944052,0.0012035394,0.95792484,0.000032635042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9598937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98456305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040106297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021300849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09007988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15454924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995503882","doi":"10.7202/019264ar","title":"Discursive Constructions of the Self in British Romanticism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Romanticism; Romance; Identity (music); Poetry; Face (sociological concept); Mode (computer interface); Literature; Self; Sociology; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; History; Epistemology; Art; Psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.017318879154970903,"score_gpt":0.2509928803101399,"score_spread":0.23367400115516898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995503882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30860704,0.0074268244,0.0042536086,0.0079302415,0.00020647456,0.000017092832,0.000020784018,0.000036999016,0.6715009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873641,0.000695136,0.0002920938,0.00019382338,0.000016195623,0.0000057250795,0.0000056336876,0.000018779907,0.011408485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952739,0.0029849003,0.00012076994,0.00021951082,0.0009595984,0.00044132478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986259,0.00065017055,0.00014051003,0.0001544909,0.00027478673,0.00015428713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025379837,0.00024198538,0.00037844756,0.001365816,0.009234845,0.008679956,0.00054116757,0.0009574836,0.001992593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042762323,0.00027219276,0.00010543138,0.0017903935,0.04053615,0.0031600147,0.0034735764,0.002244938,0.00038336543],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019936684,0.000009685907,0.00083558727,0.00003601958,0.0000027631463,0.00026002302,0.30504498,0.000057912177,0.0002908442,0.6815373,0.0018276856,0.010077385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027202599,0.000039588416,0.0079311775,0.00034598148,0.000009016678,0.00097341364,0.23470066,0.0005428444,0.0006004799,0.2860852,0.46868545,0.00005894968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06024013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07671446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06024013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010051875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002430262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11977899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997622706","doi":"10.7202/043907ar","title":"Jupiter, Hercule et Minerve : trois modèles d’élaboration du droit des croyants par le juge étatique","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016418369234424607,"score_gpt":0.2683120482346693,"score_spread":0.25189367900024473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997622706","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23353985,0.0067240265,0.020921076,0.0446917,0.00020599522,0.00010341114,0.00039739313,0.00011217671,0.69330436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9464322,0.0019105083,0.0021761812,0.0010173472,0.00004065688,0.000042533422,0.000117558666,0.00004783758,0.04821526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849296,0.00072173506,0.000022964543,0.00018343073,0.00028916934,0.00028974685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896204,0.00031433383,0.00015311055,0.000118099335,0.00027768846,0.00017461143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016237537,0.0005753921,0.00037649306,0.0018555799,0.0043423967,0.006438368,0.0011568393,0.0015728845,0.009499464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002549006,0.00026650124,0.0005554815,0.0017664506,0.014497441,0.0039823134,0.0027947873,0.0024042823,0.0007295746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038627364,0.000028585162,0.0060281344,0.00008266139,0.000027330625,0.00024307446,0.068989456,0.0007092494,0.00015820838,0.9078424,0.0041092765,0.011743042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008182777,0.00009273849,0.057664525,0.00092683017,0.00010904799,0.0003792384,0.112947576,0.0050862734,0.00048189037,0.3900196,0.43207607,0.00013442444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40129414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4255878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40129414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018503675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014972585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7979167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997888101","doi":"10.4102/lit.v24i1.278","title":"Waardepeilings van die digkuns van C.M. van den Heever","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Literator","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poetry; Confessional; Transcendental number; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Style (visual arts); Literature; Quarter (Canadian coin); Theology; Art; Art history; History; Politics; Law; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.018395888167760978,"score_gpt":0.29392074007817465,"score_spread":0.27552485191041365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997888101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08467831,0.18656719,0.002923798,0.046317447,0.0070471833,0.00006869114,0.00025971376,0.00009269622,0.67204505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83405894,0.029799325,0.0017545875,0.0029416562,0.0011764241,0.000052858686,0.00016048625,0.00029508874,0.12976062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997401,0.001235175,0.00007510575,0.00025019978,0.0008086165,0.00022990668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987853,0.0005996141,0.000117318545,0.00007626176,0.00029829447,0.00012326412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015815444,0.00041924266,0.0004002715,0.0009242896,0.003337275,0.005837503,0.000450006,0.000888766,0.0065134983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059532532,0.00021689263,0.00015804905,0.0008227347,0.0041062306,0.0016497887,0.001659714,0.0020581912,0.001162085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015077062,0.00007397911,0.0012766276,0.0005350368,0.000049520368,0.0014746446,0.12650837,0.0011996605,0.0021676568,0.54900014,0.16289997,0.15466364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045343863,0.000010441603,0.000630213,0.00030755342,0.0000040960936,0.00024121732,0.00974788,0.00014033713,0.00046785668,0.00940763,0.97902566,0.000012572824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03608153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048219632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03608153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00576582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029991558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07174301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998186628","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007250","title":"Aboriginal Governments and the<i>Charter</i>: Lessons from the United States","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Charter; Humanities; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023730508597716887,"score_gpt":0.2749457366745499,"score_spread":0.25121522807683305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998186628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39134666,0.015029817,0.0003146522,0.104822844,0.00042980732,0.000029169338,0.00006115867,0.00001887482,0.48794705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713567,0.0049263523,0.00017892921,0.004141998,0.000045622615,0.000016249041,0.00001728389,0.000008356237,0.019308541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982339,0.00082301017,0.000027076938,0.00007424132,0.00016888087,0.00067276217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803823,0.00090292277,0.00016678915,0.000110379224,0.00040488134,0.000376797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002134939,0.00015526592,0.00019964002,0.0007892539,0.014543704,0.0057817264,0.0006757356,0.0017145093,0.005134545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032864332,0.00019332852,0.00021258106,0.0013280868,0.010347086,0.0020585025,0.0033481077,0.003042804,0.00022665576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065571396,0.00007809784,0.008552942,0.00015737818,0.000014958204,0.0012013717,0.42849007,0.0003487745,0.00018808793,0.48880777,0.031924475,0.04017049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021489666,0.00005092329,0.019209431,0.0009585785,0.000030063171,0.00019295712,0.55655617,0.00019046644,0.00025510087,0.027375365,0.3951226,0.000036823105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75281507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8355465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24718493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016383272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023071615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49728125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998558287","doi":"10.3828/bjcs.19.2.12","title":"Human Rights, Culture and Everyday Lives","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Politics; Citizenship; Democracy; Immigration; Political science; Sociology; Identity politics; Indigenous; Political economy; Economic growth; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.023549705632268596,"score_gpt":0.2901029053085789,"score_spread":0.2665531996763103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998558287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15143801,0.0663101,0.0033713405,0.0787604,0.0014107476,0.00008692786,0.0005337642,0.00011374167,0.69797504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95225686,0.019526595,0.0010637708,0.007224021,0.000501783,0.00007185872,0.0001467676,0.000038669164,0.019169644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953452,0.0026694336,0.0001176337,0.00035964054,0.0007111996,0.0007969293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974687,0.00061683735,0.00024675365,0.00020998706,0.00028845124,0.001169287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024718211,0.0003784885,0.00072398497,0.00113117,0.011511991,0.016054753,0.0012657497,0.0018326882,0.009182095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034911262,0.00015009308,0.0001494473,0.0022239708,0.04375463,0.0071017286,0.008017631,0.002880347,0.0010557696],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024481644,0.000085862106,0.0051949946,0.00027434842,0.000034708995,0.0005018833,0.3288602,0.0003075779,0.00032317516,0.550553,0.037177388,0.07666238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008681987,0.000034739245,0.00721848,0.0011313435,0.000007906374,0.00027984494,0.21990803,0.000072825016,0.000086901346,0.18567033,0.58552843,0.000052394353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056380443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06023575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94361955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056852065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008639868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112104535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999671988","doi":"10.3138/cjls.26.2.253","title":"How Jean-Guy Belley Thinks: A Translator's Note","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Multiculturalism; Cult; Law; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Formalism (music); Legal realism; Political science; Comparative law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.030960784218211065,"score_gpt":0.2633694446291456,"score_spread":0.2324086604109345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999671988","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031510962,0.0069396487,0.00020750222,0.8757347,0.110595435,0.000044524877,0.000263906,0.00009529508,0.0058039557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007974566,0.00393117,0.0004661146,0.88305485,0.037437685,0.00017174352,0.00013726622,0.00028540933,0.0665412],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546885,0.0011162445,0.00032202626,0.0008999998,0.001507173,0.00068561255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97935563,0.00424103,0.0007766399,0.00039579332,0.01289998,0.0023309689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005026582,0.0017962261,0.0018418527,0.0024911882,0.01001444,0.009498037,0.0052817096,0.01919522,0.019167412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03355905,0.00086284656,0.0015323857,0.0023566664,0.006104267,0.00758494,0.0034058932,0.028831324,0.012379143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012961426,0.000009649068,0.00017739931,0.00007727596,0.0000042138818,0.00038854365,0.0012290183,0.00003318894,0.00005892979,0.0026145598,0.99312073,0.0022735996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013505841,0.000015827303,0.001080442,0.00046169694,0.000007968051,0.00032478102,0.003465955,0.00015537917,0.00006605056,0.0013183245,0.99303377,0.000056426583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44913778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42976594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44913778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022013932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022630181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89304703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999753978","doi":"10.5931/djim.v8i2.243","title":"Stillborn: Regulated midwifery in Nova Scotia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Statutory law; Nova (rocket); Political science; Focus (optics); Focus group; Obstetrics; Gynecology; Medicine; Sociology; Law; Ethnology; Engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.03096911979044573,"score_gpt":0.34047482602731716,"score_spread":0.3095057062368714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999753978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94343364,0.0015800042,0.00032207792,0.013888545,0.00015798573,0.000102377875,0.0015425351,0.000028503206,0.03894446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736477,0.00047050894,0.000314036,0.0020459408,0.0000121365,0.000036426085,0.00027199124,0.0000070974233,0.023194075],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984053,0.00021906431,0.00007342188,0.00011811887,0.00027940865,0.0009047174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962734,0.0007439931,0.0005911723,0.0001636045,0.0010621138,0.0011657026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010800415,0.00011477829,0.00017197544,0.0005233742,0.0032431998,0.0019902969,0.00094729493,0.0010190479,0.0036956752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034292522,0.00022990048,0.00019660135,0.00074012356,0.001542935,0.00033507243,0.0018424795,0.0010057981,0.00026349069],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00132405,0.0002518107,0.7313491,0.0011188651,0.00013680816,0.018253159,0.028936043,0.0052547115,0.010010714,0.07639748,0.04777281,0.07919447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006677052,0.000119748176,0.9226477,0.00037222682,0.000022642495,0.00048517215,0.022108303,0.0013044782,0.0008635129,0.0011575612,0.05079014,0.000061789986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9758405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9887504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04508799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04508799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05339651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32713783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000235353","doi":"10.3828/bjcs.19.2.3","title":"Canadian Bijuralism: A Conversation of Cultures","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Legal culture; Acknowledgement; Denial; Space (punctuation); Sociology; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.027135842068425554,"score_gpt":0.2958954212728363,"score_spread":0.26875957920441074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000235353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27392972,0.008807777,0.008122381,0.29093415,0.0025717064,0.00022857582,0.00047780614,0.00020574387,0.41472223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.953373,0.0019378274,0.0022662457,0.016436877,0.00011212381,0.00008382059,0.000092891874,0.000114861155,0.0255823],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98109114,0.008018986,0.0003107914,0.001391327,0.004709257,0.004478573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98810464,0.004434913,0.00041920174,0.00030747135,0.003588544,0.0031452845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009901662,0.0008642235,0.00076882984,0.0031029005,0.09453915,0.019313188,0.0035635454,0.0069731376,0.005959026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018382356,0.00081710477,0.000719891,0.0057771862,0.036788806,0.010205412,0.0118268225,0.0134278955,0.00052527356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026179541,0.00001408353,0.0014514143,0.00004362181,0.000009213427,0.0005466436,0.8533085,0.00011034734,0.00038515998,0.11529236,0.021508574,0.007303949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075698213,0.000010816714,0.0017678613,0.00016774063,0.000012677355,0.00013839954,0.7078581,0.00034646,0.0002032476,0.009926974,0.2794642,0.000095959214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9839138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9878377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21600465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21600465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16931728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90932345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000251237","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2006.10.3.212","title":"<i>R</i> v <i>Henry</i> : A Welcome Retreat from an Overly Broad Interpretation of S. 13 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Statutory interpretation; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.03020607224087154,"score_gpt":0.31135709387155686,"score_spread":0.28115102163068534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000251237","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00049552677,0.0022854605,0.0010749099,0.97060454,0.014935222,0.000019792595,0.00008698649,0.00007462677,0.010422921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021145945,0.0023426705,0.004044268,0.93044394,0.012538073,0.00007764294,0.00007174131,0.0003106461,0.02902506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9706041,0.006515519,0.001711655,0.0026437677,0.01461506,0.003909981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.939726,0.033033747,0.0018738284,0.0025931783,0.017426986,0.005346176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035243638,0.0012077861,0.0021324432,0.0020375145,0.021739759,0.023510225,0.010203476,0.041659687,0.004577185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077542774,0.0011442585,0.0013887223,0.002676984,0.05520723,0.012086281,0.0054731225,0.075473346,0.002163525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015964362,0.000008208053,0.000093064395,0.000050384726,0.0000083884415,0.00009289122,0.0034469692,0.000059374113,0.00010540018,0.1144626,0.8773672,0.004289411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033181717,0.000021357366,0.00076947,0.00047965275,0.00001918858,0.00013795173,0.0057161055,0.00035204805,0.00032501126,0.06394181,0.9280077,0.00019652554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7998619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8711781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20013809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031982977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.080395006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40263343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000271173","doi":"10.7202/043859ar","title":"Changing Codes and Changing Constitutions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Parliament; Law; Legislature; Political science; Civil code; Harmonization","score_opus":0.016119675016936598,"score_gpt":0.2750217116239015,"score_spread":0.25890203660696487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000271173","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1179462,0.006100327,0.030643512,0.12633416,0.001855349,0.00014282856,0.00025709864,0.00020798402,0.7165125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9323214,0.0019804998,0.0088956095,0.008435051,0.0002809297,0.00008066705,0.00012271364,0.00010948739,0.047773603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890743,0.003755264,0.00030577256,0.0015173224,0.0029204427,0.0024269982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99166226,0.002829106,0.0006141231,0.0015857774,0.0024674442,0.0008413579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008807207,0.00024554806,0.0003750333,0.0018436235,0.011327332,0.008004588,0.001369298,0.0027879968,0.006482137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017047795,0.00023438553,0.0003063742,0.0019373188,0.046300597,0.006028194,0.003820291,0.0039161295,0.0004719952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033132442,0.0000028469813,0.000244188,0.000009240482,0.000001427088,0.000026356338,0.00407039,0.00019037632,0.000083730636,0.9867812,0.0019092608,0.0066776713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015930507,0.000019304762,0.002786859,0.00014416996,0.000011724238,0.00008795041,0.010522309,0.00045360962,0.0004403887,0.44255176,0.5429295,0.00003647496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3732313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43432307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3732313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0345483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032869607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74211764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000510276","doi":"10.1163/157181810x527996","title":"Children's Rights, Paternal Power and Fiduciary Duty: From Roman law to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Children s Rights","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Fiduciary; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Jurisdiction; Duty; Reservation of rights; Right to property; Human rights","score_opus":0.011617177820660875,"score_gpt":0.242039782195847,"score_spread":0.2304226043751861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000510276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12584719,0.017553313,0.0025923862,0.13609017,0.0005280802,0.000069934074,0.00026745626,0.000047868514,0.7170035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9452875,0.0045129904,0.00089772535,0.0144112585,0.00016429398,0.000032898868,0.000050294595,0.000034652887,0.03460832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99290985,0.001233809,0.00014427667,0.0007427602,0.002438922,0.0025303399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992987,0.0035232266,0.000350121,0.00023124082,0.0020446426,0.0008636937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004553016,0.00027071757,0.0004768228,0.0012052326,0.024974953,0.011784033,0.0018847765,0.006205813,0.0050305733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011851719,0.0004810429,0.0003016223,0.0018683225,0.035155777,0.0036978263,0.004002129,0.010464474,0.00022041188],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055793143,0.00000582652,0.0007732272,0.000012786387,0.0000027924693,0.00015421673,0.0053816615,0.00013545832,0.000043003813,0.9838399,0.006206734,0.003438721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006831573,0.000031029525,0.010971714,0.0010118614,0.00006761487,0.00028995678,0.021952717,0.0020062139,0.0007297487,0.40826944,0.55442876,0.00017252746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9795671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.985523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1353321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1353321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13326526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98190767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001030104","doi":"10.1177/000842980203100231","title":"Towards an Ethics of Community: Negotiations of Difference in a Pluralist Society James H. Olthius, editor Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2000. ix + 226 p","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Law","score_opus":0.10671445348012082,"score_gpt":0.36641926540263936,"score_spread":0.25970481192251854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001030104","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019512024,0.37538558,0.008119899,0.5233185,0.021814613,0.000048901606,0.000031905296,0.000052115938,0.06927728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20557693,0.508393,0.016028859,0.072676994,0.050325584,0.000297122,0.00010084445,0.00031908808,0.14628167],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99587965,0.0030072741,0.00010983421,0.0001502377,0.0007032161,0.00014988292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954464,0.0032166834,0.00017025927,0.00014434154,0.0005329879,0.0004893575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005819135,0.0007491041,0.00088069896,0.001375361,0.0037701945,0.010506507,0.0013276215,0.0053626043,0.004340541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008064177,0.00050763413,0.00038710985,0.0013510231,0.02244911,0.012466666,0.002997679,0.007601167,0.0015388282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003818027,0.000029650271,0.00022142264,0.00042698978,0.0000130317885,0.00035549342,0.019705921,0.00029953182,0.00019699278,0.43341336,0.45396885,0.09133065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001567092,0.000014741036,0.0003484166,0.0010523944,0.000005501482,0.00024220759,0.011599104,0.00023750114,0.000098154494,0.3154052,0.67096615,0.000014986417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066232313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01460424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010506507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037233038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067306133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030774951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003846455","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x12000219","title":"Relations of Freedom and Law's Relations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Centrality; Human sexuality; Constructive; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Epistemology; Economic Justice; Focus (optics); Independence (probability theory); Element (criminal law); Gender studies; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07818005685223442,"score_gpt":0.3462182411075495,"score_spread":0.2680381842553151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003846455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048896804,0.006608172,0.019815728,0.036369517,0.00039926937,0.00005361938,0.00011836691,0.000056371417,0.88768226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764708,0.0013082182,0.0018756704,0.0015453427,0.00031671007,0.000074530144,0.000038056147,0.000038148733,0.018332545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916952,0.0043625743,0.00023973665,0.0012429762,0.0013707145,0.0010887604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99202955,0.005380126,0.0006123848,0.0008419432,0.00053657196,0.0005994388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008190811,0.00039521544,0.00057850376,0.002079279,0.00843431,0.011967338,0.0010043302,0.0039257254,0.010372596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012394164,0.00037471415,0.0005614105,0.0014757428,0.07896295,0.009971673,0.008557886,0.0058781197,0.00060396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018742576,0.000003867172,0.000096748845,0.000004503414,0.0000013504792,0.00001608207,0.0020480445,0.000039476086,0.00002884232,0.9966658,0.0003340958,0.00075927854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008318547,0.0000063569487,0.0002886731,0.000031351203,0.00000220821,0.00003872343,0.0015841508,0.00008426976,0.00006163891,0.96446115,0.033426207,0.0000069064536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007136009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035041613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011967338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006460291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004383708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046872914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004144292","doi":"10.7202/1026984ar","title":"Autorité parentale et patriarcat d’État au Canada","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.016467100027088264,"score_gpt":0.26094058232843126,"score_spread":0.244473482301343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004144292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5395308,0.007706841,0.0016917482,0.026096173,0.00034574678,0.00005662754,0.0008508587,0.00007654104,0.42364463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9213945,0.0025862446,0.00036847024,0.0009834615,0.000026968335,0.000010303446,0.00012129694,0.000029399189,0.07447921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982084,0.00016713318,0.000034386656,0.00017843826,0.0005340836,0.00087753945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820733,0.00025173256,0.00015136882,0.00007040707,0.0007256687,0.0005935469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006507312,0.00019795002,0.00027983292,0.0008637354,0.013170972,0.0042617605,0.00092263886,0.0007337931,0.011964401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018545392,0.00022239155,0.00020677528,0.0023989768,0.00460302,0.001081386,0.0019436522,0.0018006705,0.0003565054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009394346,0.000051717936,0.06495323,0.00018426261,0.000048298632,0.0022418185,0.120146364,0.00070857117,0.00094699016,0.6992154,0.03266393,0.0787456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025817188,0.000035598343,0.19528094,0.0004206572,0.00005668064,0.00070968916,0.09615354,0.0008598613,0.00073741464,0.011901463,0.6937179,0.00010047052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9933995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99708813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08966837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08966837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12341517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6505926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006710169","doi":"10.1007/s10566-009-9089-3","title":"Processes of Discernment when Considering Issues of Neglect in Child Protection Practice","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Child & Youth Care Forum","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Discernment; Neglect; Negotiation; Identity (music); Narrative; Psychology; Social psychology; Child protection; Sociology; Epistemology; Medicine; Nursing; Aesthetics; Social science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.021929645524282046,"score_gpt":0.29880630822512816,"score_spread":0.2768766627008461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006710169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5360203,0.007933705,0.06578698,0.1857528,0.0017630715,0.001159691,0.0001351262,0.00019305211,0.20125534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97888696,0.001100665,0.0142913405,0.0019654632,0.000114860704,0.00027197032,0.0000359554,0.00005141584,0.0032813377],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9113392,0.06670562,0.00467514,0.0023159685,0.00700508,0.007958976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8203132,0.14316504,0.011359296,0.005159401,0.01167275,0.008330326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09309246,0.0006859406,0.0011162439,0.0071787713,0.027372643,0.029022165,0.0046332553,0.009466793,0.0046271435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21370775,0.001850744,0.001191638,0.0037094003,0.035830256,0.022569487,0.02354353,0.017834425,0.0005143875],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004091367,0.000032700704,0.004309273,0.000115314906,0.0000080715445,0.0013391167,0.9127966,0.0000826758,0.00026836304,0.066980764,0.0010080964,0.013018127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014138142,0.000034013883,0.002833931,0.0010149766,0.00002656647,0.001393105,0.89750487,0.00044764654,0.00072509586,0.060225956,0.03572546,0.00005425243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022874793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024093462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09309246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013951624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04681086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49232584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W200684408","doi":"","title":"Reconciliation and the Supreme Court: The Opposing Views of Chief Justices Lamer and McLachlin","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Dissent; Law; Political science; Constitution; Economic Justice; Sovereignty; Negotiation; Treaty; Majority opinion; Politics","score_opus":0.06383653880782145,"score_gpt":0.3268023272790587,"score_spread":0.2629657884712373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W200684408","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013615369,0.010261298,0.0024979643,0.88490254,0.0024530883,0.000052739146,0.00006136675,0.000044369495,0.08611119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4341658,0.0037774672,0.0031117063,0.52387184,0.00474689,0.00021765857,0.000056271932,0.00008267968,0.029969655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9460469,0.02307635,0.001557254,0.005194556,0.013103685,0.01102129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9652853,0.022644076,0.0012875195,0.0011481759,0.006727716,0.0029072089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05141005,0.0005468316,0.0015563857,0.0024252038,0.045353636,0.030685779,0.0067537674,0.05372983,0.0034796027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06390733,0.00087473314,0.0015770302,0.0035312187,0.041513205,0.011406133,0.011138798,0.050509997,0.00058896735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000164732,0.000015986869,0.00018927829,0.000020725016,0.00001670696,0.00020499773,0.005730077,0.0001755932,0.00007673367,0.9172091,0.07245819,0.0038862226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013193388,0.00004577585,0.0010774956,0.00054224156,0.00009136099,0.00021142451,0.012773783,0.001509624,0.00064407306,0.49103093,0.4917252,0.00021603514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28372362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32427266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9519834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048016604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052391544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5641444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007883823","doi":"10.1590/s0102-71822007000300007","title":"Cuando la comunidad guía la acción: hacia una evaluación comunitaria alternativa","year":2007,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Psicologia & Sociedade","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0415173431423895,"score_gpt":0.3958454968028396,"score_spread":0.3543281536604501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007883823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22216143,0.0059018717,0.19115506,0.094675325,0.00084016926,0.0010128903,0.00037363157,0.0010887722,0.48279092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537177,0.0013464363,0.026879292,0.0025431109,0.00011132959,0.0006055861,0.00009179976,0.00017468928,0.014530188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95551807,0.03683512,0.0006117429,0.001864541,0.0039189067,0.0012515452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9570504,0.02746545,0.002990625,0.006248103,0.0045449263,0.0017005003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024171276,0.00080130785,0.00072584226,0.0016115952,0.0026701144,0.011769814,0.0017768008,0.0026034873,0.012849999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044864126,0.0003614479,0.0007410873,0.002305055,0.009376924,0.013972197,0.0043539135,0.0034680215,0.00096242566],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045364234,0.0007903596,0.011166493,0.0011800108,0.0001355938,0.00006664648,0.03790713,0.0045531034,0.00092190324,0.7240041,0.011746898,0.20707427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041626045,0.0016531451,0.024122281,0.0031550813,0.00048287938,0.00021631153,0.062904656,0.023885183,0.004997692,0.64645594,0.23148929,0.00022127971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013541968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013316543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024171276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00930941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010218661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12783146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009546468","doi":"10.7202/037456ar","title":"La contractualisation du mariage : réflexions sur les fonctions du Code civil du Québec dans la famille","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013862957462075394,"score_gpt":0.24374287799460762,"score_spread":0.22987992053253223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009546468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3977402,0.0117497705,0.009536848,0.14776286,0.0007581152,0.00007104856,0.0003452937,0.000074690746,0.4319613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.959541,0.0010649619,0.00092049787,0.0034005297,0.000036826674,0.000037732294,0.00002711229,0.000024847695,0.034946486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956571,0.0020381634,0.00006991366,0.0003853261,0.00092693715,0.0009225404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961279,0.0014596769,0.0002861286,0.00016420613,0.0014797379,0.00048230842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039763604,0.00041745705,0.00027303802,0.0011200262,0.02303147,0.006219456,0.0013332836,0.0037084683,0.004869196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005792506,0.00038796087,0.0002668473,0.0013794105,0.022860242,0.0034382462,0.0025891722,0.0041666734,0.0003006264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031065247,0.000014688408,0.005637434,0.00006463405,0.000010625033,0.00055969966,0.37856176,0.000245921,0.00047104165,0.57755387,0.023028605,0.0138206445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020301914,0.000037417616,0.03826764,0.00073106907,0.000034325265,0.00042512294,0.35065985,0.0011584656,0.00097522966,0.035719804,0.57181,0.0001607317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96716166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.978786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06613293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06613293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04533517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47983027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009924126","doi":"10.7202/042618ar","title":"Remarques sur le nouveau droit de la famille et le droit des successions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Political science; Scope (computer science); Code (set theory); Event (particle physics); Humanities; Welfare economics; Law; Computer science; Philosophy; Economics; Physics; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.01412121617965344,"score_gpt":0.28359589144621367,"score_spread":0.2694746752665602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009924126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67208236,0.012809821,0.0010835867,0.07274644,0.0005317995,0.000024281528,0.00017042912,0.000013282915,0.24053799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751065,0.0028358991,0.0002260633,0.0014139262,0.00013474959,0.0000076284277,0.000019637975,0.0000051272514,0.020250503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978064,0.0010745848,0.000041951695,0.00014250695,0.00040327376,0.000531287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99433845,0.0026559534,0.000652954,0.00021923802,0.0013981069,0.0007351882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003307686,0.00023787806,0.0002701748,0.0011202088,0.007023056,0.0021663588,0.00069912826,0.0009513162,0.0065508736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010408879,0.00015773979,0.00016619878,0.0010911984,0.009456301,0.002203566,0.0016837481,0.002248229,0.0002592858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121223675,0.000109066095,0.040948372,0.00017462936,0.000022933646,0.0017936898,0.18227671,0.00052285613,0.001138859,0.67252797,0.028163536,0.07220029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003864357,0.0001288484,0.27319786,0.0011335664,0.0000307258,0.0018162369,0.2752867,0.0008430682,0.0010925751,0.036105186,0.4102305,0.000096070304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73922366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84097356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73922366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015795173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012192432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5246242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011029261","doi":"10.1108/cgij-05-2014-0020","title":"Freedom of choice requires availability of choice options","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Governance An International Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Limiting; Statutory law; Corporate governance; Value (mathematics); Abortion law; Political science; Business; Law; Actuarial science; Law and economics; Economics; Family planning; Medicine; Population; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.09010935566680336,"score_gpt":0.44202132777318615,"score_spread":0.3519119721063828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011029261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059501853,0.090794556,0.042481747,0.12188142,0.0016645723,0.00031356473,0.00061195827,0.00006044317,0.68268985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92837685,0.0330026,0.009199248,0.015904501,0.0008101365,0.0002886461,0.00021321356,0.00004017194,0.012164693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842821,0.009744981,0.00095941644,0.0012748443,0.002833629,0.0009049786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9538936,0.035507657,0.003937258,0.0033542754,0.002220346,0.0010867738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012213775,0.00023305185,0.00050189736,0.0009853311,0.0021226914,0.005005841,0.0010919475,0.0022408767,0.012003979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030457657,0.00026896424,0.0007717409,0.0013998356,0.020092612,0.009784643,0.0030203292,0.0038853532,0.00076185603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004070513,0.000024554975,0.0015891971,0.0008823241,0.000032772936,0.00026568712,0.00377419,0.00028462667,0.0001226327,0.9554518,0.004831907,0.032699488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031872965,0.00007253019,0.0033951872,0.005501898,0.00006234238,0.0012310186,0.007600356,0.0003376063,0.00037273954,0.6170781,0.36426917,0.000047084803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041604103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00468507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012213775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028998468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007733752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064593434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011344008","doi":"10.7202/042436ar","title":"Les lignes de force de la Loi 89 instituant un nouveau Code civil et portant réforme du droit de la famille","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Legislation; Balance (ability); Political science; Law; Order (exchange); Flexibility (engineering); Code (set theory); Civil code; Gender equality; Intervention (counseling); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Gender studies; Business","score_opus":0.009897689320448926,"score_gpt":0.2739895230547965,"score_spread":0.2640918337343476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011344008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05532601,0.020809148,0.0032344423,0.14225844,0.002774148,0.00024823716,0.00095463573,0.0002470478,0.7741479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21276794,0.0041684695,0.0022868419,0.02198517,0.00040914552,0.0001860046,0.0002547342,0.0000987764,0.7578429],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99673045,0.00048085162,0.0000575926,0.00017388871,0.0015089362,0.0010482857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799466,0.000722628,0.00011520767,0.00011197257,0.00076173124,0.0002938059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022625118,0.00038688243,0.0003090223,0.0010493277,0.010641014,0.00752085,0.0009371146,0.0048372196,0.011155096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058309454,0.000449511,0.00038893922,0.0011669502,0.0051076435,0.0017490492,0.0013389692,0.006640355,0.0016409523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030201212,0.00004807114,0.0025469642,0.00008228337,0.0000063735156,0.00048445485,0.01829491,0.00029300898,0.00071804225,0.70669514,0.24254979,0.028250717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007745998,0.000010630797,0.0059286784,0.00011653103,0.0000037902125,0.000071063754,0.0027290406,0.00013167987,0.00024993625,0.0043785325,0.986347,0.00002532974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93917775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95573235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06082225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056984108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051900208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4134506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011373185","doi":"10.1017/s0036930609004748","title":"<i>Crux et Vocatio</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scottish Journal of Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Regional Municipality of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Glory; Theology; Explication; Existentialism; Relation (database); Philosophy; Power (physics); Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02512801277923531,"score_gpt":0.34125849201204367,"score_spread":0.31613047923280835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011373185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04522171,0.015669543,0.0012998687,0.03979985,0.0013754368,0.000011215831,0.00004901977,0.000042681415,0.8965307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8899383,0.0044324067,0.00034872338,0.0058644298,0.00074056664,0.00002376016,0.00003823067,0.00006135167,0.09855228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998874,0.00054132723,0.00002515333,0.00009893648,0.00024313328,0.00021746554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932456,0.00034494794,0.000078371326,0.00006044411,0.00010931954,0.00008226177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010792166,0.00022734859,0.00023112644,0.0009064595,0.0054674908,0.004629061,0.0004042939,0.0016109501,0.006471057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016168884,0.00011002955,0.00016515076,0.0008558456,0.016892971,0.0025756902,0.0029376964,0.0032964824,0.0006104489],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000093530925,0.000010136645,0.00029046604,0.000033272936,0.0000020517234,0.00012942452,0.02996471,0.000031259206,0.0001620518,0.94437325,0.019770121,0.005223806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007188267,0.000035723144,0.002393045,0.0003664604,0.0000074173736,0.00042301472,0.024437219,0.00012741497,0.00040699632,0.055297844,0.91647977,0.000017846887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018303508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017726848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018303508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004180755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023202267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03639394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012150543","doi":"10.7202/1027846ar","title":"No Middle Ground: Ad Medium Filum Aquae, Aboriginal Fishing Rights, and the Supreme Court of Canada's Decisions in Nikal and Lewis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Fishing","score_opus":0.014964504969565811,"score_gpt":0.2531205142691949,"score_spread":0.2381560092996291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012150543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16097508,0.007513539,0.001291512,0.15467945,0.0005947182,0.00009552395,0.00028343144,0.00003673201,0.6745301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9095598,0.0012516695,0.0006542203,0.028026003,0.00012739412,0.000057448364,0.00004619347,0.00002375848,0.06025342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928652,0.0010718679,0.0001533996,0.00059071055,0.0021179493,0.0032008733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99489117,0.0022267506,0.00023428071,0.00016362264,0.0016098922,0.0008743022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057288045,0.00039607988,0.00053967093,0.0012033439,0.031573117,0.014449013,0.0027287991,0.008098057,0.0033902444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010253373,0.00036726872,0.00045765523,0.0015202876,0.025262272,0.0027472982,0.0041018473,0.008573691,0.00022608598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029982362,0.0000170886,0.0016400364,0.000024721854,0.000010902661,0.00037974,0.013068436,0.00021770953,0.00016035682,0.96256924,0.01774004,0.0041418816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001431432,0.000051219056,0.016703872,0.0012400311,0.00017940093,0.00035384824,0.09064542,0.0024066868,0.0014954928,0.31582436,0.570521,0.0004356409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98094064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98856086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096902855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.096902855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13598846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7030827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014540562","doi":"10.7202/043889ar","title":"La nature des fictions juridiques au sein du nouveau mode de filiation unisexuée au Québec; un retour aux sources ?","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.013116298934180301,"score_gpt":0.2826642674253672,"score_spread":0.2695479684911869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014540562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3124536,0.051089812,0.0059407735,0.074404605,0.00296871,0.00010691586,0.001811906,0.00020290024,0.5510207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88333756,0.012010197,0.0011218612,0.0020206436,0.00036952528,0.000035604182,0.00028860616,0.0000946847,0.1007214],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981894,0.00046144403,0.000045372384,0.00020875398,0.0006745065,0.00042063024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99540776,0.0014815562,0.00045834447,0.00027069804,0.0019772355,0.00040425852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022017383,0.0005821136,0.0004832738,0.004325789,0.021686846,0.01048687,0.0018069019,0.001605482,0.018318325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007178567,0.00031113985,0.00024576002,0.0052785915,0.0140267275,0.003184628,0.0023384143,0.003289843,0.0010294974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007134026,0.00002624737,0.013895433,0.0007007718,0.000041071562,0.0015699515,0.49130267,0.0003604743,0.0007145088,0.32427955,0.059907045,0.10713095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006031993,0.000017182123,0.034511663,0.0013919226,0.000040728322,0.00061391137,0.15709727,0.00026970645,0.0005263034,0.006753512,0.7986915,0.00008029407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93594307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9708553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06405693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055471648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043370843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40247685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015038629","doi":"10.7202/006012ar","title":"Not \"Forsworn with Pink Ribbons\": Hannah More, Thomas De Quincey, and the Literature of Power","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism on the Net","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Romance; Ballad; Power (physics); Literature; Philosophy; Covert; Sect; Nationalism; Politics; Religious studies; Art; Theology; Law; Poetry","score_opus":0.012852562534627451,"score_gpt":0.2735440782376118,"score_spread":0.2606915157029843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015038629","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047451615,0.12711948,0.0012688229,0.6043304,0.004358556,0.000019773914,0.000041104315,0.000037173522,0.21537308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8487538,0.026462752,0.00065069256,0.034092434,0.0029173587,0.000044458597,0.000015257275,0.00009080311,0.086972445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985734,0.000930073,0.000017494503,0.00011771938,0.00023526582,0.00012599683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725395,0.0017712724,0.00021174834,0.00013404345,0.00031421953,0.0003147552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015126049,0.00036337855,0.00032823393,0.0009353599,0.010647748,0.007205932,0.00078301225,0.00231408,0.0032236825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056188214,0.00025491696,0.00012112075,0.0010217718,0.027014893,0.0071607884,0.0027191485,0.00513964,0.00043300056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003998431,0.000029742163,0.0005767187,0.000105916806,0.000010814604,0.00046924138,0.15829681,0.00007316261,0.00013613145,0.6152591,0.20676692,0.01823532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018000615,0.000024627352,0.0010523766,0.0005879268,0.000007899613,0.00034836435,0.085837655,0.00011673953,0.00022611437,0.15165173,0.76010764,0.000020999283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02288477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04007669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02288477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004771736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029944784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04550308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015075908","doi":"10.7202/1027764ar","title":"Loi sur les biens matrimoniaux : restrictive à juste titre ou démesurément étroite ? Un examen de l’application limitée de la loi avec un coup d’oeil de biais à la décision M. c. H.","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019418726437855683,"score_gpt":0.27214391658686465,"score_spread":0.25272519014900896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015075908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25396082,0.010395681,0.0035327247,0.18800326,0.0007852716,0.00014766681,0.0001510764,0.000066171946,0.54295737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8725531,0.0037811897,0.0013624087,0.012259469,0.00018276635,0.00011743387,0.00008712267,0.00006728646,0.10958909],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98563194,0.004432009,0.00044100152,0.0011273758,0.0046715573,0.003696165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98591995,0.004831351,0.0009694702,0.00070855545,0.0047554476,0.0028152869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011187137,0.00038013648,0.00060871494,0.0013847649,0.018408453,0.014191552,0.0032588139,0.0040205107,0.013514312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02463047,0.0005747172,0.00054623035,0.0020111746,0.017630402,0.0066825626,0.009467647,0.007902161,0.001239679],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013542712,0.00009721473,0.01955106,0.0002741589,0.00003525773,0.0007892779,0.21333869,0.000423365,0.0013086332,0.64778316,0.030625498,0.08563823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003275533,0.00013116034,0.042987004,0.0012163057,0.00004295665,0.0002668775,0.3152176,0.0005359347,0.00085298024,0.036010068,0.60257894,0.00012743632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5012343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6191702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5012343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036970187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04687161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015589168","doi":"10.3138/utq.82.4.864","title":"‘A More Exact Purity’: Legal Authority and Conspicuous Amalgamation in Early Modern English Law Guides and the Oxford Law Lectures of Sir Robert Chambers and Samuel Johnson","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Legitimacy; Law; Perspective (graphical); Vocabulary; Sociology; Political science; Literature; Philosophy; Art; Linguistics; Visual arts","score_opus":0.008730402287007074,"score_gpt":0.22854771537416432,"score_spread":0.21981731308715724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015589168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29953182,0.030616403,0.013829467,0.166132,0.0018692057,0.00005271776,0.00009261383,0.00013193481,0.48774385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96425325,0.0023115063,0.0010634962,0.002523396,0.00023350074,0.000011083925,0.000014158761,0.00006344197,0.02952627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99358106,0.004103056,0.00024440046,0.00039026415,0.0010508673,0.0006304214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879005,0.00884797,0.00093356916,0.0004764164,0.0010377275,0.0008037515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006279535,0.00026559798,0.00031507923,0.0021565352,0.01011912,0.010796625,0.0006882682,0.0022707246,0.0026874242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010843113,0.0005000631,0.00013498879,0.00161073,0.05827995,0.0105761755,0.004220549,0.0051901904,0.0003094412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014125092,0.000009388357,0.0006504533,0.000041170766,0.0000012200518,0.00016735143,0.4299419,0.000032735727,0.00009445794,0.5572419,0.005856495,0.0059488434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002314687,0.00004163421,0.0033674126,0.0003614512,0.000008155452,0.0004190099,0.20435195,0.00020760228,0.00054792187,0.098802336,0.69182265,0.000046788824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04510225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.087414876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04510225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011671165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066404175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08967942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021030357","doi":"10.1111/heyj.12249_44","title":"Justice: The Biblical Challenge <i>(Biblical Challenges in the Contemporary World)</i>. By Walter J.Houston. Pp 150, London, Equinox, 2010, £15.99.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Heythrop Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"SAINT; Equinox; Economic Justice; Citation; Theology; Philosophy; Classics; Media studies; Sociology; History; Library science; Art history; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.24689575202953543,"score_gpt":0.38396757177454516,"score_spread":0.13707181974500973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021030357","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045021344,0.8440192,0.00018770096,0.091033414,0.0102055725,0.000011729463,0.00013867958,0.000097545184,0.053855926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03375856,0.55518085,0.0010593192,0.033548247,0.024678495,0.00008015474,0.0004137556,0.00021376005,0.35106692],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999173,0.0002492605,0.000042452368,0.000064381515,0.00032471493,0.00014620397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989674,0.00037577903,0.00013316762,0.000046807614,0.0001897519,0.0002871506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011880503,0.0008853096,0.00069750374,0.0019723563,0.0029756818,0.008280341,0.0009983277,0.0037561543,0.05421028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037029264,0.00055665814,0.00033986446,0.003294191,0.0034489462,0.010564894,0.0046240767,0.003850309,0.014303289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006729535,0.0000065056347,0.000069372065,0.00016822827,0.0000025505558,0.000029636396,0.00046065912,0.000014342205,0.000019088275,0.0068569453,0.9403244,0.052041486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000424076,0.000006447224,0.00086974184,0.0010761978,0.000003358341,0.0001692627,0.0020688542,0.00003572722,0.0000334832,0.01304285,0.9826801,0.000009621647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012667841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046865303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05421028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033819957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036381534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18135142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021608390","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.2.070812ra","title":"RELATIONAL AUTONOMY AND INDIVIDUALITY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Individualism; Independence (probability theory); Relational theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03045350251775319,"score_gpt":0.2505324012269758,"score_spread":0.2200788987092226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021608390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08090195,0.10941162,0.024419377,0.028327648,0.000723576,0.00004499747,0.0000758172,0.000058576494,0.75603646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9580573,0.024503069,0.0017029828,0.0017388937,0.0006456536,0.000033148997,0.00004543713,0.000017420214,0.013256015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810165,0.00076197163,0.000078982834,0.00032031702,0.0005100359,0.00022694952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870193,0.00061511836,0.00019092002,0.00015839604,0.00014484895,0.00018865112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018985502,0.00016286169,0.00027735796,0.00076736993,0.0018259544,0.0032108768,0.00065011665,0.00073257386,0.0046090316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002631469,0.000096431606,0.0002509139,0.0007957626,0.012207056,0.0041640806,0.0036566104,0.0013677666,0.00037362924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032220821,0.000006155697,0.0004919979,0.00007606968,0.0000061940805,0.00007172973,0.0047073667,0.00011206756,0.00008828707,0.97886825,0.0009879365,0.014580599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005385744,0.000023333352,0.0032736734,0.0003175688,0.0000112157795,0.0005789064,0.005458337,0.00016945007,0.00018114338,0.7547675,0.23519905,0.000014524946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023672814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015026453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046090316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017840712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017145306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015418708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023640790","doi":"10.3138/ecf.20.2.264","title":"Paula R. Backscheider and Catherine Ingrassia, eds.  <i>A Companion to the Eighteenth-Century English Novel and Culture</i>. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005. xiii+550pp. US$162.95. ISBN 978-1-4051-0157-8.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Art history","score_opus":0.014054145973887109,"score_gpt":0.26218578237269496,"score_spread":0.24813163639880786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023640790","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042721786,0.94271445,0.0010423593,0.015246928,0.0041096034,0.000012544758,0.00022363225,0.00008163812,0.03614155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007164721,0.8749608,0.0022302794,0.0020949887,0.0025937322,0.000041307238,0.0002548099,0.00016068452,0.110498674],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956423,0.00012508608,0.0000357694,0.00006718484,0.00016536623,0.000042309475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861383,0.00075649517,0.00013298039,0.000045364417,0.00032205653,0.00012934906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011433042,0.0013808991,0.0009344657,0.0020959456,0.0016791733,0.0034884915,0.0010780354,0.0017006276,0.04020709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002483147,0.0009605908,0.0003744376,0.0023533134,0.0015695811,0.0071473084,0.0010816901,0.0020317477,0.021748457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040201936,0.000020034435,0.00015209937,0.0008625283,0.000008609261,0.00007593217,0.002166081,0.000059138238,0.0001250137,0.006915912,0.86540645,0.124168016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047743065,0.000009546731,0.0007472269,0.0008514921,0.000009489799,0.00028217424,0.0012324329,0.000034437744,0.00013784322,0.004755013,0.9919259,0.000009708841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014275772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031907544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04020709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015021276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025966566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1345061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024212870","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0312","title":"When tribalism meets liberalism: Human rights and Indigenous boundary problems in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Democracy; Indigenous; Political science; Law; Tribalism; Citizenship; Human rights; Liberal democracy; Sociology; Politics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.010950430013658355,"score_gpt":0.2184607752053984,"score_spread":0.20751034519174003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024212870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18368557,0.004592888,0.0044126767,0.18832846,0.0005297725,0.00012243555,0.00022891103,0.00008677627,0.6180125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9650711,0.0010898295,0.0012789796,0.008663463,0.000080331585,0.000045270197,0.000058784404,0.000054256823,0.02365807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863905,0.0019209792,0.00023919698,0.0011513439,0.0037089887,0.0065890085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98846453,0.0041939123,0.0004882171,0.00073127955,0.003054985,0.0030671265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007555596,0.00039966733,0.0010268184,0.0023775345,0.062871054,0.020544467,0.004102147,0.0070899576,0.0098674735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02073649,0.00051173323,0.00072139985,0.0041758125,0.053243723,0.007814739,0.011205324,0.012865092,0.00034164285],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021324846,0.00001809226,0.0018909125,0.000031619216,0.00001164327,0.0003262555,0.027310045,0.00045093088,0.00007958598,0.9535358,0.008052131,0.008271719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008740838,0.000024693258,0.010708912,0.00031639307,0.00006446916,0.00028404858,0.12875281,0.003014481,0.0004377703,0.58164334,0.27444676,0.00021888522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99373794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22529764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22529764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28370002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8985449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024683456","doi":"10.7202/043637ar","title":"L'influence des traités internationaux des droits de la personne sur le droit fédéral australien","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.019486313599725677,"score_gpt":0.2831399428494802,"score_spread":0.2636536292497545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024683456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9784712,0.0003190242,0.00018569444,0.0006319539,0.000018258526,0.000008871194,0.000125992,0.000006407249,0.020232497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99355644,0.00018158439,0.00007462179,0.00004007888,0.000004077342,0.000006369669,0.000033918688,0.000003975631,0.0060990467],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988556,0.0004044647,0.000029408837,0.0001528468,0.0002185668,0.00033905212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99698347,0.00085671066,0.0006738419,0.00012161511,0.0006245757,0.000739812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007559947,0.00020843308,0.00023723187,0.0004602076,0.0013157404,0.0014386141,0.00033145113,0.00028357876,0.006277031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030179266,0.000105110754,0.00026068676,0.00061958557,0.0011711284,0.00033946228,0.00086339755,0.0007325201,0.00030378444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043663022,0.00017338361,0.846022,0.000106543645,0.00023144938,0.000878546,0.06902212,0.0013516742,0.00322089,0.01237885,0.0022189768,0.063958876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044502617,0.00006598481,0.974499,0.000047074904,0.000027082075,0.00008400288,0.016985564,0.00021156421,0.00019317871,0.00023069278,0.007639502,0.000011978009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5717378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7338021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5717378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034168537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035919042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86156857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W202561496","doi":"","title":"R. v. Kapp: Aboriginal Fishing, Andrews and Affirmative Action in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Supreme court; Law; Fishing; Political science; Action (physics); Physics","score_opus":0.024691001684359223,"score_gpt":0.2996355685379767,"score_spread":0.27494456685361746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W202561496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09677227,0.01541247,0.0016695717,0.2770466,0.0016082397,0.00020472628,0.0010617384,0.00011846936,0.60610586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6533332,0.0043771174,0.0013775253,0.095467485,0.00039445594,0.00015260173,0.0001335321,0.00006855895,0.2446955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947712,0.00063769403,0.00013020543,0.00041155034,0.0017001055,0.002349337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960311,0.0017455366,0.00014887739,0.00012237202,0.0012601577,0.00069192133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037715132,0.00044263198,0.0005422382,0.0009064556,0.032141272,0.009146693,0.0027955994,0.015191515,0.0072874594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009652035,0.0006088527,0.00058849686,0.0017147738,0.008081015,0.002095884,0.0026727887,0.011148408,0.00057507027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007502414,0.000041602514,0.0058670966,0.0001105849,0.000043167787,0.0012718241,0.015670521,0.00084602094,0.00060262287,0.7490119,0.21441616,0.012043416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017264478,0.00006034092,0.03006591,0.00092685333,0.00022555768,0.00051060354,0.029734896,0.0032338146,0.0016641227,0.10513627,0.82789844,0.0003706464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9887213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06286331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06286331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15468721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45610738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026014252","doi":"10.1177/0008429814526145","title":"“He thinks he’s failed”","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Mennonite University","funders":"","keywords":"Christian ministry; Plural; Faith; History; Religious studies; Literature; Political science; Law; Theology; Sociology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07419605902992657,"score_gpt":0.39707218224862184,"score_spread":0.3228761232186953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026014252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19767877,0.009699308,0.005020436,0.114296734,0.005478097,0.00009356225,0.00041956172,0.00030302143,0.6670104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84953153,0.002172003,0.0010753425,0.021381881,0.00038747347,0.000026215102,0.00013106676,0.00015950938,0.125135],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965835,0.0010677029,0.00006985788,0.00021425086,0.0013053095,0.00075947953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966979,0.00075616396,0.0004006282,0.0001492817,0.0014317811,0.0005643606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020870594,0.00053907407,0.00028267637,0.0008984961,0.011844372,0.0042606094,0.0007247739,0.0014299912,0.009378771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006835444,0.00019819026,0.00022520774,0.00076867774,0.0115844635,0.0018911337,0.0013204513,0.004780183,0.0035148903],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007840429,0.00003261869,0.010876741,0.00022978948,0.000042539064,0.0022158204,0.48783332,0.00011138056,0.0014128602,0.08414479,0.370025,0.042996746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003395364,0.000019850528,0.007859082,0.0002319767,0.000012767811,0.0019126706,0.18966877,0.00010084929,0.00048427054,0.0025336398,0.7971282,0.000044594522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21786809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36984715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21786809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00910693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005588311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43319994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026527854","doi":"10.7202/043828ar","title":"Codes et codifications : dialogue avec la common law ?","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022256679555304835,"score_gpt":0.2953366754184335,"score_spread":0.27307999586312864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026527854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034742232,0.021835808,0.07982522,0.40105265,0.0032574616,0.00015509831,0.0006102652,0.00021013839,0.45831114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86785185,0.008877229,0.03169127,0.023698254,0.0010813844,0.00031986518,0.00031890633,0.00038612736,0.06577507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9689679,0.020662792,0.0008155547,0.002060625,0.0055187247,0.001974483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9665019,0.019799288,0.001699086,0.0034138889,0.007186854,0.0013990416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01787343,0.00084805535,0.0009093436,0.004939,0.017602757,0.021562787,0.0030327186,0.0056313192,0.006366442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03879588,0.0004748468,0.00063608633,0.009196687,0.06298488,0.017647134,0.0062872167,0.009012691,0.0007552642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008506703,0.0000042636243,0.00042197632,0.000047219437,0.000005903294,0.00006085827,0.026774721,0.00011742907,0.00004538854,0.9544851,0.008428836,0.009599847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016867176,0.000014477265,0.0014009137,0.0009482153,0.000015339267,0.00012644353,0.049542714,0.00072222936,0.00034636195,0.45608583,0.49071717,0.00006342591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61361027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61361027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054168236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.074467205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7773305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027318412","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2002.17806","title":"Le partenariat civil, d'un continent à l'autre","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; General partnership; Art; Law","score_opus":0.03769913312653062,"score_gpt":0.2679104109691336,"score_spread":0.23021127784260298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027318412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16124606,0.01043636,0.004659651,0.020765645,0.0010306538,0.00009851947,0.00024295136,0.00007946472,0.8014407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7892142,0.0069469716,0.0020435008,0.0046116137,0.0002486677,0.00011446849,0.00021508105,0.00004618338,0.1965593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997617,0.0009256854,0.00007890143,0.00034393417,0.0004902913,0.00054425164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980253,0.00049563445,0.00029723014,0.00036509373,0.00041238344,0.00040441804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014972014,0.00031545406,0.00030912957,0.0009766606,0.0064557404,0.0068041896,0.0007349723,0.0012520911,0.024786573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032107458,0.00018007969,0.00032452837,0.001846851,0.009691267,0.0022145936,0.004156222,0.0020497602,0.002186218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003852196,0.000042498035,0.021024598,0.00025674023,0.00004702821,0.00065142405,0.08560922,0.00021759959,0.0010415039,0.7689225,0.02059952,0.10154876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006324037,0.00004783215,0.024229534,0.00042664603,0.000020920008,0.00042631783,0.045553483,0.00007349643,0.00029187594,0.011643899,0.91726184,0.000017886015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04616001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07413582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04616001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031612602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0083328225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09178269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030102691","doi":"10.3138/utlj.52.3.253","title":"Dealing with the Legacy of Native Residential School Abuse in Canada: Litigation, ADR, and Restorative Justice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Economic Justice; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Tort; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.017026486490842728,"score_gpt":0.23118182172628224,"score_spread":0.2141553352354395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030102691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5006869,0.02381113,0.004621715,0.1737588,0.000620742,0.00022427694,0.00023494271,0.00008478329,0.2959568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660719,0.008549899,0.0016093673,0.007752081,0.00008910128,0.00003520912,0.000047041416,0.000019265424,0.015826028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931213,0.0008426645,0.00021722501,0.0005016053,0.0021269415,0.0031901582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99538815,0.0011734803,0.0005894417,0.00014532117,0.0014215349,0.0012819384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034577583,0.00035378954,0.00047594187,0.0023832698,0.054033697,0.013406321,0.0034233206,0.004716616,0.005026761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0107900575,0.00049083045,0.00050519215,0.0047025885,0.018063722,0.003957583,0.0075095464,0.0068600667,0.00024943388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057846977,0.00022042781,0.04769889,0.00033496943,0.00007071228,0.006753836,0.20895223,0.0013383618,0.0006852921,0.57011074,0.045866124,0.117910564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004719019,0.000094958064,0.07993902,0.0012566242,0.00017879122,0.0033815731,0.50991404,0.0027222498,0.0010488735,0.058355547,0.34276524,0.00029588392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99435186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17084499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17084499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28450516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9617023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030363845","doi":"10.1086/673873","title":"Rehabilitating the Declaratory Theory of the Common Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legislation","score_opus":0.02214349315025743,"score_gpt":0.2970554508928305,"score_spread":0.27491195774257304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030363845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0530696,0.0009077715,0.115987845,0.08286067,0.0013051673,0.0001241955,0.000110814806,0.00016461,0.7454692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716741,0.00021868855,0.007914943,0.0034387566,0.00031967548,0.00007944075,0.000041496885,0.000042908436,0.016269969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886269,0.005029292,0.00051644485,0.0017867144,0.0028198601,0.0012207323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854843,0.0060193087,0.0011904611,0.003608137,0.002957431,0.0007404359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014133658,0.0004409115,0.0007790843,0.0014582542,0.005568845,0.010105038,0.003106271,0.0079288855,0.01032689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025009057,0.00040911147,0.0008876278,0.0008675006,0.0341782,0.011394105,0.0074998722,0.009439806,0.0013056272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024594617,0.0000035983512,0.000041919706,0.000003564388,8.929898e-7,0.000023218801,0.00028579435,0.00012692864,0.000017426588,0.9984633,0.0005593915,0.00047154567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010881587,0.0000086799355,0.00007563237,0.000032312244,0.0000045712836,0.000036438447,0.0003664662,0.0018118045,0.00010450185,0.9878604,0.009679637,0.000008761889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007367039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066328035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014133658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007642882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007873652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07474685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031267729","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.24.1.207","title":"Mandatory Family Mediation and the Settlement Mission: A Feminist Critique","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Settlement (finance); Family mediation; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Party-directed mediation; Lawyer supported mediation; Transformative mediation; Family law; Economic Justice; Political science; Power (physics); Law; Dispute mechanism; Criminology; Sociology; Gender studies; Business","score_opus":0.03219285432878593,"score_gpt":0.28928956723856775,"score_spread":0.2570967129097818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031267729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27345905,0.016224422,0.010833138,0.1409641,0.0007539936,0.000058636826,0.000044887125,0.000029793648,0.55763197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98178035,0.0013307278,0.00039902213,0.001639701,0.00009666632,0.000025033638,0.000003714862,0.0000064254427,0.014718335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99510777,0.0031945917,0.00006445051,0.00025015665,0.0004662052,0.0009168965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973852,0.0017205811,0.00027376178,0.0001315775,0.00025529962,0.00023349565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054259216,0.00033137307,0.0002869471,0.0011666751,0.014595849,0.0054307715,0.0015044966,0.0038881262,0.004082754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055346424,0.00022080544,0.00027148754,0.00083065825,0.039383397,0.0040562293,0.004630362,0.0037678971,0.00021986155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001126332,0.000012644671,0.0006405961,0.000034971607,0.000002416032,0.00030393363,0.09147688,0.000173514,0.000061666804,0.89989054,0.0022348203,0.0051568123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005585109,0.00007766226,0.006136544,0.0012443264,0.000021012702,0.00059569156,0.31288713,0.0010810487,0.0004836181,0.32722986,0.3501505,0.00003668359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09420882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11852487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09420882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015735691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018917028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18732095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031497028","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0026","title":"Banging Constitutional Bibles: Observing Constitutional Culture in Transition","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Modernity; Political economy; Globalization; Ideology; Citizenship; Face (sociological concept); Political science; State (computer science); Economic history; Sociology; Law; History; Social science","score_opus":0.021269041020626062,"score_gpt":0.25743577320305894,"score_spread":0.23616673218243286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031497028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98747545,0.000069783884,0.00031031884,0.0005211165,0.000008588792,0.000015281843,0.00005988883,0.000008842959,0.011530694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99925476,0.000023842455,0.00011046319,0.000045251756,0.0000018498943,0.000009595867,0.00001865692,0.0000042706006,0.0005312439],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989912,0.0005267509,0.000031675692,0.00009418032,0.00013276955,0.00022346321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99579996,0.0017730859,0.00083225,0.00035481996,0.00046826946,0.0007715641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002080329,0.0001060061,0.00017237947,0.0013002352,0.0041324017,0.0043284493,0.00052988715,0.00074713636,0.0030314182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008630149,0.0001810545,0.000116776944,0.0012721283,0.006042296,0.0027620187,0.004535589,0.0021211314,0.00023331998],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022676581,0.00014012054,0.082968876,0.00005219983,0.0000149495545,0.00020957454,0.8734786,0.00016436272,0.0030063745,0.015860243,0.0014856101,0.02239229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015017316,0.00011810232,0.21136102,0.00004629392,0.000009894839,0.00008265497,0.76462907,0.00041428115,0.0012130339,0.0057270764,0.01634518,0.000038409693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027410917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05561309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027410917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026637095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014145796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054502726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031972923","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0011","title":"Troubling the Definition of Pornography: Little Sisters, a New Defining Moment in Feminists' Engagement with the Law?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Feminism; Lesbian; Supreme court; Harm; Economic Justice; Law; Identity (music); Sociology; Sexual orientation; Appeal; Political science; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Art","score_opus":0.04530703119893826,"score_gpt":0.2694244258199427,"score_spread":0.22411739462100444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031972923","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13836223,0.04575352,0.00828393,0.46103284,0.0025051362,0.0000326789,0.000037648606,0.000045576322,0.34394652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90470684,0.007894119,0.0015727743,0.036010187,0.0009816195,0.00004668922,0.00001732996,0.00007661381,0.048693806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99412364,0.0037420278,0.00010661645,0.000469297,0.0010857133,0.00047269295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99606234,0.002506023,0.0004936469,0.00025607756,0.00034737415,0.00033453386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054432335,0.00031871584,0.00048541554,0.0010084737,0.009906221,0.011832741,0.0012000861,0.0042754854,0.0031147315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009946872,0.00033622584,0.00021115609,0.0010073944,0.06519851,0.014275624,0.008402244,0.006919168,0.00032978185],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009549442,0.000010482531,0.00064957974,0.000044542747,0.0000017675292,0.00013411588,0.13869886,0.000019904151,0.00014754801,0.8428629,0.007860606,0.009560186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011643808,0.000030226089,0.0013456552,0.0005588599,0.000005253183,0.0004227711,0.2856322,0.00009947986,0.0004583739,0.2012304,0.51017606,0.000029127168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017570999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029645268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017570999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008407832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006054985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061003387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032951353","doi":"10.1002/crq.21041","title":"Judicial settlement‐seeking in parenting disputes: Consensus and controversy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conflict Resolution Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Mediation; Coercion (linguistics); Family mediation; Political science; Lawyer supported mediation; Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Child custody; Best interests; Family law; Negotiation; Empirical research; Social psychology; Psychology; Dispute mechanism","score_opus":0.0400552926137572,"score_gpt":0.3229035647532588,"score_spread":0.28284827213950164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032951353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8140903,0.015019834,0.0131301,0.108343355,0.0008874706,0.0001379327,0.00006129716,0.000032494503,0.048297197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99712,0.00084932544,0.0007684777,0.00085145305,0.0001119988,0.000024652923,0.000012810202,0.000006225904,0.00025509988],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.89574766,0.073907614,0.0069520003,0.006256141,0.012543579,0.004592963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.66032064,0.28713357,0.013418383,0.007869594,0.026038492,0.0052193077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17550562,0.00028086815,0.0011529762,0.006395189,0.012787653,0.014047741,0.0049148416,0.007828194,0.0023291858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21927592,0.00062747026,0.0005845649,0.0052250484,0.038972106,0.010097457,0.011621306,0.0057619265,0.00020796398],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009865484,0.00008535585,0.014903745,0.0005473953,0.00008380182,0.0011234158,0.7518118,0.0005185836,0.0004642889,0.18124546,0.0036140913,0.04550344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006404616,0.00006794415,0.014411742,0.0017752739,0.000049619684,0.0004964498,0.79430085,0.0017189027,0.00050597935,0.15649703,0.030006442,0.000105786086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073876795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010721387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17550562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008762443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012311218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92817354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032958395","doi":"10.7202/042247ar","title":"L'incidence de la nouvelle Loi sur les assurances sur les régimes matrimoniaux","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Law; Statutory law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Meaning (existential); Statutory interpretation; Civil code; Section (typography); Covenant; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014041951368181994,"score_gpt":0.27197364772768634,"score_spread":0.25793169635950436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032958395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83603567,0.012233087,0.0012254361,0.026484039,0.0002227441,0.00003926874,0.0005063537,0.00009544284,0.123158075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97783434,0.0019536347,0.00016396707,0.0008913208,0.000099589706,0.000012524657,0.00006626871,0.000006999914,0.018971428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948344,0.0006375251,0.00018394344,0.00037768905,0.0024296197,0.0015368311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898825,0.004091677,0.0027736109,0.00039409436,0.0019063285,0.00095170224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038237844,0.00022418454,0.00028829294,0.001823446,0.0040522725,0.0036011795,0.0007538631,0.0017053905,0.0068073063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011069644,0.00036895915,0.00024624317,0.0019083776,0.0050020353,0.0011785261,0.0012999127,0.0045511425,0.00039284726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034391723,0.00014839099,0.19546567,0.00067451445,0.00007027134,0.0039345827,0.12249598,0.0008801384,0.008162755,0.40593797,0.05011866,0.21176718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003082147,0.00012684701,0.40450904,0.00054235914,0.000029431574,0.001582161,0.01959417,0.00083930156,0.0031610483,0.0028202652,0.5666667,0.00009788842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7292589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74571925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7292589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021063682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010383066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54467106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034111128","doi":"10.1017/s0714980800012265","title":"Parents Who Sue Their Adult Children For Support: An Examination of Decisions by Canadian Court Judges","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020591332642586835,"score_gpt":0.2583687626041644,"score_spread":0.23777742996157758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034111128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9201791,0.0051719756,0.00014257856,0.011676816,0.00012579153,0.00019622677,0.0004731849,0.000009298877,0.062024947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881296,0.003301366,0.00014396515,0.0013989004,0.000020834988,0.00006553523,0.0001539418,0.000006871692,0.0067789643],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890588,0.0014615632,0.0005067432,0.00053739984,0.0048911762,0.003544371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724096,0.008718418,0.0036160003,0.00042800338,0.011257219,0.003570752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008944762,0.00025666287,0.00040361925,0.0048456327,0.017680593,0.0051127467,0.0016691118,0.0017414587,0.003397037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0433043,0.0004239126,0.00026503488,0.008416487,0.0055884225,0.0013242428,0.0033855555,0.002124401,0.00018895937],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001257327,0.000077193894,0.20182015,0.00028932132,0.000031776683,0.0026268286,0.68101496,0.00018261297,0.0004877685,0.030856924,0.029815407,0.05267138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021271486,0.000044453525,0.36400533,0.00082364184,0.0000461939,0.0004067838,0.5255504,0.0002351467,0.00028638073,0.0015745685,0.10690829,0.00009762904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98307264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99325705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07044139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07044139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10611105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5110904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034634205","doi":"10.1093/icon/1.1.35","title":"Realizing equality in the twentieth century: the role of the Supreme Court of Canada in comparative perspective","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Doctrine; Politics; Constitutional right; Sociology","score_opus":0.04158335274513759,"score_gpt":0.3465534930473471,"score_spread":0.30497014030220954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034634205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059616793,0.10122774,0.0014473698,0.08512861,0.001079661,0.000026001759,0.00014457047,0.000025940928,0.7513033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.932066,0.02983053,0.00069674355,0.011104404,0.00034944637,0.000024614541,0.00006539921,0.000034876884,0.025828078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928861,0.0014771449,0.00009009998,0.0003705499,0.0018838062,0.0032923056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99553394,0.0015238285,0.0002303582,0.000100693454,0.0018342223,0.0007769597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036426503,0.00033987124,0.0005080262,0.005859683,0.038447846,0.021499647,0.0018719123,0.0060838014,0.0050192634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008083351,0.00031581995,0.00038089082,0.007190063,0.037294738,0.0069438703,0.0039501246,0.005444635,0.0002323523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008521701,0.000005982793,0.00044711644,0.00003165184,0.00000642915,0.00017528461,0.01542404,0.00014648426,0.000044706503,0.9717228,0.006070229,0.0059167193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020342146,0.000020654095,0.009623642,0.0009016792,0.000049007205,0.0002832855,0.0694098,0.00048635036,0.00035547724,0.15311055,0.76564723,0.0000919504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9783237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.990816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21252644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21252644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14301412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91335773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035453133","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100009145","title":"First Nations and Self-Government: A Matter of Trust","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Health Services","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013139973385049802,"score_gpt":0.2509144429320573,"score_spread":0.23777446954700748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035453133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34587094,0.0064872866,0.0041908403,0.023328299,0.00023520303,0.00003195771,0.00006755061,0.000022607122,0.6197653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99573237,0.00049147394,0.000107771564,0.00016166414,0.000018659379,0.0000064281053,0.000005701604,0.0000029702046,0.003472998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99505025,0.0026798556,0.00018073477,0.0002551977,0.00076129567,0.0010725786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909423,0.0048090485,0.0018686778,0.00048106632,0.00085987005,0.0010389762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028584567,0.00016645728,0.00030441297,0.0014966377,0.00474928,0.0073157316,0.0005203464,0.0015046018,0.0067508705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009601659,0.00012261856,0.00021445953,0.002133638,0.01535792,0.0046706544,0.003665913,0.0016567988,0.0002847098],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016694212,0.000011841232,0.0041674045,0.000035911307,0.0000065917566,0.00013147217,0.013397658,0.00021323781,0.000032332744,0.9767705,0.0009147613,0.0043015853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000356959,0.00010740553,0.036886152,0.00097326556,0.000042462558,0.00089509605,0.13993849,0.001966491,0.00042368326,0.59009176,0.2285713,0.00006823986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021595038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017075518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99116254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008837485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045135426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06412077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036660388","doi":"10.7202/038658ar","title":"Laws of Desire: The Political Morality of Public Sex","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Jurisprudence; Human sexuality; Law; Pleasure; Supreme court; Constitution; Liberalism; Politics; Mainstream; Sociology; Political science; Identity (music); Psychology","score_opus":0.10866045140832759,"score_gpt":0.3559120432329751,"score_spread":0.2472515918246475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036660388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06997896,0.0024287547,0.00623366,0.07449616,0.00026414153,0.000027690885,0.000035971905,0.000028477078,0.8465062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871093,0.00044375812,0.0003097609,0.0024228175,0.00006763674,0.000014981609,0.000007975452,0.00001540899,0.009608376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99383485,0.0027713524,0.00008979764,0.0004182363,0.001529758,0.0013559808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99601126,0.0022418557,0.00036424928,0.00037753463,0.00057615235,0.00042901209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052738315,0.00019830064,0.00021909607,0.0010864458,0.012783025,0.011020626,0.00093562686,0.0035795048,0.0034120118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010041925,0.00026513246,0.00033453142,0.0008636905,0.08603063,0.0059606903,0.0045504533,0.004901706,0.0002462028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019247686,0.0000037918749,0.00019195098,0.0000041205817,7.974396e-7,0.000027045311,0.0109571135,0.000033488035,0.00003055906,0.98619634,0.0008608341,0.001691957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017134884,0.0000126623945,0.002167257,0.00010732153,0.000007765565,0.00012927348,0.031165136,0.00038751806,0.00025385362,0.833558,0.13217038,0.00002363881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15119171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14363208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15119171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016153025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017144943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30062336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036720829","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.1.111","title":"Disability and Care: Still Not “Getting It”","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Ethnology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03274786859055405,"score_gpt":0.26834873718814833,"score_spread":0.23560086859759427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036720829","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038901812,0.03405592,0.0013347417,0.9083337,0.005073545,0.000015085509,0.000041454008,0.000018868437,0.047236595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40116388,0.06897168,0.0025684147,0.4821596,0.0126802875,0.00017336839,0.00013189914,0.00012000796,0.03203085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98006266,0.009787367,0.0007270822,0.0014784276,0.004520896,0.0034235625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98463386,0.008977905,0.00062696566,0.00087691046,0.002654773,0.002229664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013847321,0.0006218834,0.00108246,0.00187773,0.011610466,0.013400935,0.0029465926,0.014045101,0.008646274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026214164,0.00031310378,0.000925105,0.002078451,0.045603488,0.018066637,0.01183195,0.02040997,0.00097368564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021733986,0.00003296882,0.0011616907,0.00050065934,0.00002634102,0.00021061416,0.025494246,0.00016378699,0.00007955376,0.76533276,0.12686364,0.08011209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020239435,0.000051890733,0.0021672803,0.0034862738,0.000024965497,0.00031572607,0.05760719,0.00013330158,0.0001221563,0.27266607,0.6633435,0.000061479375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08072206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13957392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08072206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020635288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03086115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1605044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036865304","doi":"10.2478/bjlp-2013-0013","title":"The supreme court of Canada and the offender’s right to be transferred to serve his sentence in Canada: interpreting the international transfer of offenders act in light of Canada’s national and international human rights obligations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Baltic Journal of Law & Politics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of the Western Cape; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Appeal; Charter; Political science; Discretion; Jurisprudence; Sociology","score_opus":0.027626439528948273,"score_gpt":0.2773204547638114,"score_spread":0.24969401523486312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036865304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1050686,0.010960745,0.0030231436,0.26453486,0.002200244,0.00020657321,0.00092509825,0.00007493132,0.6130058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8967897,0.004208238,0.0016496953,0.056576155,0.0006800975,0.000099269906,0.00019748582,0.000100438156,0.039698746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874894,0.001920591,0.0003896568,0.00095672545,0.0035931733,0.005650422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800772,0.00812891,0.0008215575,0.0004369003,0.008181287,0.0023541597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009540182,0.0006308257,0.0009196733,0.0032773614,0.0483129,0.020818707,0.0058783707,0.018264808,0.0073276013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027096996,0.0011241591,0.0009401718,0.004165633,0.032457933,0.0037054394,0.0053032353,0.019865718,0.0004740877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034916433,0.000022983448,0.0027274096,0.00006627536,0.000027379994,0.0014845374,0.020254206,0.0007639528,0.00022179753,0.8961894,0.07426458,0.003942588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013908444,0.000051111052,0.01822714,0.0028302837,0.0004068492,0.00045896726,0.082781,0.00578047,0.0011750004,0.22155455,0.6658508,0.00074478105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9937702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9968071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19921182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19921182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29928583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92880076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041180421","doi":"10.1163/157181802761586734","title":"Law Commission of Canada, Restoring Dignity: Responding to Child Abuse in Canadian Institutions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Children s Rights","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Commission; Law; Political science; Child abuse; Criminology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Medical emergency; Psychology","score_opus":0.032056415312240474,"score_gpt":0.30364309045645504,"score_spread":0.2715866751442146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041180421","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11688234,0.021723153,0.0010456808,0.65607166,0.0025529831,0.00043037403,0.0010728516,0.00010473081,0.20011613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70749277,0.02176816,0.0024261223,0.08602019,0.00049330667,0.00020103947,0.00033904082,0.00010723261,0.18115215],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914522,0.00092019374,0.0002665279,0.0003410921,0.002716949,0.0043030344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818357,0.0030023488,0.000767054,0.00021736903,0.00819595,0.0059814756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047330726,0.00040047115,0.0004737344,0.0023910748,0.043666363,0.0107125,0.0037260302,0.010554218,0.013420033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022922033,0.0006944084,0.0005362378,0.0031371359,0.007577331,0.0031510557,0.00399515,0.011024561,0.0005694208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007019899,0.00011653513,0.02198866,0.00049831165,0.00005494644,0.0016973064,0.03982272,0.0012936658,0.0006786698,0.23853669,0.6373772,0.05786515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058019763,0.0000601353,0.057613097,0.0014455091,0.00013920541,0.00039814823,0.103256285,0.0009914734,0.0008190335,0.013401196,0.8215432,0.00027464723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9977252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19488397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19488397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4805382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9338205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043700055","doi":"10.1515/1565-3404.1291","title":"Family Law Reform in Australia, or Frozen Chooks Revisited Again?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Family law; Legislature; Face (sociological concept); Law reform; Law; Political science; Best interests; Welfare; Common law; Sociology; Law and economics; Social science","score_opus":0.07582124601240359,"score_gpt":0.3830031713158916,"score_spread":0.30718192530348803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043700055","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36841923,0.026538499,0.0012510075,0.44509447,0.0014013586,0.00006881342,0.000051355568,0.000033894787,0.15714131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9387888,0.00610905,0.00066712283,0.028521411,0.00019906306,0.000040491705,0.000013942832,0.000011709262,0.025648417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967077,0.0013834614,0.00009254045,0.00027151802,0.00058619987,0.00095848175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974711,0.00069463596,0.00036087332,0.00020919584,0.00058117387,0.00068303494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041733664,0.00013629523,0.00032663002,0.0010206355,0.0089782085,0.0051374515,0.0009729883,0.003933813,0.0040994794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011106123,0.00021919866,0.00025214563,0.00127624,0.011965336,0.0062556043,0.0040627937,0.0042938353,0.00021201873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026613441,0.00013379303,0.007507543,0.00029722316,0.00002109149,0.00087258447,0.11251965,0.00033310914,0.00048703264,0.7613948,0.022260595,0.09414596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003581872,0.0002256097,0.099821545,0.0017595714,0.00005269984,0.00067913905,0.1525079,0.0010316334,0.00055344036,0.17522348,0.5680021,0.00010709773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23697694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29084972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23697694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016524473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031601604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4711951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044882823","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x11000743","title":"The Ecclesiastical Common Law: A Quarter-century Retrospective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Liturgy; Constitution; Quarter (Canadian coin); Consistency (knowledge bases); Common law; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03313965380810882,"score_gpt":0.29778595060976243,"score_spread":0.26464629680165364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044882823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12663835,0.40907443,0.0024674917,0.046268553,0.004507775,0.00006669382,0.00038047667,0.00004146571,0.4105547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6672964,0.24832323,0.0011983078,0.012127494,0.0030997645,0.000090868074,0.00031481683,0.00009208821,0.067456946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99592245,0.0017227188,0.0003323292,0.00049923075,0.0010376927,0.0004856745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852785,0.010761773,0.0010856729,0.0007736308,0.0017400933,0.0003603921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065436,0.00030020534,0.00038682693,0.007295798,0.006134425,0.009243483,0.00082390604,0.0034928801,0.0043681203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016607314,0.0004913901,0.00022027448,0.008481814,0.021152878,0.008351283,0.0042963657,0.0054061953,0.0006998375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034295477,0.00005492206,0.0013736114,0.00033492033,0.000011437327,0.0006756846,0.036184028,0.0001481523,0.00012058983,0.8721653,0.03149404,0.05740305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023869711,0.000019527062,0.004324118,0.0011222672,0.0000063195353,0.00056047627,0.01044631,0.000063715575,0.00030736107,0.013653564,0.9694689,0.000024996392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0122946985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013392641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0122946985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007243142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004255276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05255294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W204544780","doi":"","title":"A Policy on Canon 844, 4 for Canadian Dioceses","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia canonica","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.03183636119800934,"score_gpt":0.3392317942763965,"score_spread":0.3073954330783871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W204544780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01007774,0.003207051,0.0006729166,0.072877854,0.0020137273,0.00020432816,0.001308206,0.00013131426,0.90950686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03234223,0.00060460326,0.00043186286,0.02594027,0.00008504233,0.00009125337,0.00024307049,0.000050189377,0.9402115],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99388885,0.00042373835,0.000092650334,0.0006346651,0.0019140284,0.0030460537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969055,0.00022803857,0.00006697592,0.00017899976,0.0016369278,0.0009834993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025323047,0.0009490249,0.0004675174,0.0015462767,0.026022758,0.0083241,0.0029637192,0.013839658,0.0797901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006407387,0.0006402584,0.0007342065,0.0022889595,0.003764945,0.0026985968,0.004968481,0.0068322658,0.006627773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007557627,0.00004258469,0.0018749472,0.00009440602,0.000014772699,0.0003955997,0.0031949957,0.00018190661,0.0003962376,0.3998322,0.56881785,0.025078906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010783096,0.000008098857,0.0019819743,0.00007592686,0.0000063826465,0.00002650875,0.0011692061,0.000061459774,0.00010181369,0.0020179965,0.9945188,0.00002100103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.982274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99322116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09040816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09040816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1999077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6559602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045801057","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.1.056","title":"The Supreme Court, Ameliorative Programs, and Disability: Not Getting It","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Supreme court; Humanities; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04075763082411048,"score_gpt":0.2789339670349551,"score_spread":0.2381763362108446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045801057","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08083376,0.021380492,0.0022627865,0.4486899,0.0016804805,0.00006976237,0.0002616119,0.000070133996,0.44475096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83469033,0.007644161,0.0009892158,0.0810916,0.000558503,0.00007547359,0.00010347931,0.000059085698,0.07478817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871313,0.0025398184,0.00019383385,0.00076710974,0.004329418,0.0050385757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991823,0.0027530792,0.0004041779,0.00042520184,0.0024465548,0.0021480727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058713835,0.00033216382,0.0006101406,0.0013440704,0.021147039,0.01166666,0.0021139304,0.008919469,0.007264538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017761955,0.00028556885,0.00045595047,0.001973531,0.031775277,0.004484949,0.006443061,0.009406314,0.00040231165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025483967,0.000027305257,0.003069884,0.00007094465,0.00001529606,0.00017469523,0.010579804,0.00024350072,0.00013151336,0.907679,0.05275209,0.025230415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012275124,0.00007897198,0.020275539,0.0018166291,0.00014068572,0.0002227627,0.036526322,0.00063984294,0.0006310156,0.18196961,0.7574265,0.00014940725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93293726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97274595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067062736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06250137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16744839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45348132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046776891","doi":"10.1515/1565-3404.1292","title":"Something Old, Something New? Re-theorizing Patriarchal Relations and Privatization from the Outskirts of Family Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Family law; Law; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.059238919851540256,"score_gpt":0.35029443015572254,"score_spread":0.2910555103041823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046776891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25572106,0.030727612,0.017323375,0.19520555,0.00051573117,0.00008916246,0.000044457276,0.00008141726,0.50029165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884975,0.0029325269,0.00061929796,0.0019238897,0.00006411635,0.000019611998,0.0000054663637,0.000019956153,0.005917718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949351,0.003289022,0.00006542432,0.00031830446,0.00060010835,0.0007919316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99646395,0.002383337,0.00028090057,0.00024725051,0.0003625122,0.0002620652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066540544,0.000373314,0.0003609517,0.0024276911,0.015468797,0.011616969,0.0017847763,0.0032091942,0.0018060714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005428045,0.00030633333,0.00032028698,0.001683634,0.1293381,0.013509043,0.0041156285,0.0064703096,0.00016825987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002988297,0.000009832472,0.00039664144,0.000023209015,0.00000164371,0.00014841174,0.1755398,0.00009437817,0.000053084637,0.81919193,0.0007605354,0.0037774823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010470289,0.000024916799,0.0020842883,0.0006385922,0.000011441975,0.00035182395,0.29972506,0.0008388186,0.0003289929,0.50518954,0.19077024,0.00002584422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27267602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20798373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27267602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039358873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022722062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54217774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048516103","doi":"10.1136/bmj.e4251","title":"British Columbian judge says Canada's ban on physician assisted dying is unconstitutional","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.041977735883648254,"score_gpt":0.31173181500949426,"score_spread":0.26975407912584604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048516103","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018619938,0.0030179303,0.0006709211,0.54237676,0.0056125866,0.00009121634,0.0015747825,0.00020253717,0.42783332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14684793,0.0016637199,0.0012497245,0.4316337,0.0006085463,0.00009889553,0.00059647183,0.000088382716,0.41721255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99361527,0.00031947476,0.00018395366,0.00038552863,0.0031632392,0.002332445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99211943,0.0019311921,0.00014803327,0.00017732273,0.0041709933,0.0014529859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025905827,0.0003768144,0.00054008985,0.00081463245,0.020227484,0.005365423,0.0014674971,0.015199245,0.013239924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010483798,0.0006080139,0.0006622059,0.0011513673,0.004546839,0.0013374285,0.0013373296,0.015947722,0.0024057145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031295483,0.000026420323,0.002222714,0.000046718174,0.000011978909,0.00036064343,0.0021612486,0.000084422085,0.0003858685,0.08120604,0.9051298,0.008332841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048802944,0.000022742817,0.007925006,0.00023391144,0.00004684162,0.000116637,0.0026863003,0.00023690087,0.00050157035,0.004700182,0.9833575,0.00012343336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9803899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9933035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03329209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03329209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14493962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24155211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049116657","doi":"10.7202/010321ar","title":"How to Read Aboriginal Legal Texts From Upper Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Canadian Historical Association","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Legal history; Colonialism; History; Period (music); Legal pluralism; Code (set theory); Sociology; Legal realism; Political science; Legal profession; Linguistics; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.010744771549611364,"score_gpt":0.24560144834150466,"score_spread":0.2348566767918933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049116657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26586965,0.028663114,0.019418333,0.10109804,0.003636815,0.00058231753,0.0016313824,0.0009025555,0.5781978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87402403,0.014050769,0.025869252,0.006825008,0.0004698558,0.00019333529,0.0010085005,0.0009407136,0.0766186],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966988,0.0010076663,0.00016378131,0.00026314665,0.0011448776,0.00072175346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921405,0.0032079578,0.00037367284,0.0003445901,0.0031913717,0.00074208336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00251591,0.00097123225,0.0005770277,0.0057539362,0.02275017,0.015615882,0.0019940026,0.0025582232,0.0075952057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012098026,0.00044021814,0.00026460315,0.006757652,0.019484093,0.0046806317,0.0038567577,0.0042329137,0.0013193148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028829058,0.000016795679,0.0013508018,0.00031006694,0.000009192115,0.0013055265,0.87381715,0.00020410224,0.0016707216,0.03985626,0.028366005,0.053064518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006671073,0.000007779693,0.0027581817,0.0005630098,0.000017473736,0.00059908826,0.45095333,0.00024001177,0.0013352324,0.0061016567,0.5373613,0.0000562936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9439565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97115165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056043506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05410607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.077044934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3925689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049639457","doi":"10.7202/043095ar","title":"Le droit des grands-parents aux relations personnelles avec leurs petits-enfants : une étude comparative des systèmes québécois, français et belge","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.035534812599663956,"score_gpt":0.2982724493054202,"score_spread":0.26273763670575623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049639457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845813,0.003355394,0.00015236987,0.0010845219,0.00002256691,0.000015710044,0.00042490906,0.000006065501,0.010357175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908121,0.0014993923,0.000116957905,0.00014669879,0.000005950089,0.0000150727965,0.00015114331,0.000004647889,0.0072480366],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876213,0.00029483912,0.000033805583,0.00012450674,0.000263004,0.00052177696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977233,0.00046882703,0.00056265574,0.000052487532,0.000630652,0.00056204916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012306935,0.00023705866,0.00028070164,0.0018166414,0.0054208157,0.0024417741,0.0005920722,0.000459228,0.004680081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026084224,0.00019359305,0.00018187086,0.0034173098,0.0025405055,0.00081891584,0.0009207482,0.00062777323,0.00027147925],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016644738,0.00008740882,0.57767874,0.00031228966,0.000096224736,0.0012296848,0.31862313,0.00048982666,0.0009757284,0.017136104,0.008347647,0.07485673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053391723,0.000044876568,0.83795005,0.00020436547,0.000023797586,0.0002486339,0.1171273,0.00009239363,0.00017157693,0.00017078892,0.04393269,0.000028247832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.966074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98376715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03392601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025345407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019984657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18389463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049684305","doi":"10.5539/res.v5n4p88","title":"Does Abortion Take A Human Life? Thomas Aquinas Answers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of European Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human life; Warrant; Goodwill; Abortion; Epistemology; Contemplation; Sociology; Law; Right to life; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Human rights; Political science; Humanity","score_opus":0.06239239851022458,"score_gpt":0.36903443955199705,"score_spread":0.30664204104177245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049684305","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002520936,0.022062622,0.00055216794,0.95694274,0.003204068,0.000005380223,0.000028704826,0.000008783303,0.0146746235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39670202,0.09576134,0.0017456859,0.46365547,0.017989714,0.00007859195,0.00009781831,0.00008850456,0.023880819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99465215,0.0034654757,0.00018128898,0.0005420926,0.0008323541,0.0003266337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826788,0.014710079,0.0008264419,0.00031802067,0.0007463013,0.00072034553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059632757,0.00034037905,0.00067589054,0.0007575773,0.004235616,0.0034113328,0.000829307,0.009840337,0.005515388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023301879,0.00022313367,0.00039024506,0.0007733808,0.02371363,0.011298126,0.003467041,0.010236401,0.0011048143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000476386,0.000027016184,0.0005060313,0.00026924402,0.00001095343,0.0006048872,0.0237537,0.0001411002,0.00018033572,0.77888775,0.16978677,0.025784453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013706819,0.00003554068,0.00046087313,0.0010751083,0.0000074007294,0.000640525,0.022251803,0.00014823016,0.00021912013,0.44997877,0.5251206,0.000048252605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006002853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036530022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009840337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041259155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004855521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031537235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050473596","doi":"10.7202/042465ar","title":"Regards sur le nouveau droit de la famille au Canada anglais et au Québec","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Legislation; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Statutory law; Political science; Property law; Individualism; Private law; Comparative law; Public law; Property rights","score_opus":0.00892970135996337,"score_gpt":0.24345828014881882,"score_spread":0.23452857878885544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050473596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78298914,0.015985476,0.00044523113,0.038472638,0.00022425406,0.00003415371,0.000532564,0.000018022816,0.16129841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97727907,0.003517533,0.00013465565,0.0013785298,0.000029715919,0.000010062639,0.000049644113,0.0000062635822,0.017594477],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846965,0.00038278458,0.000031411015,0.00014432828,0.00041527458,0.00055654446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964888,0.0009843566,0.00030497988,0.000060513794,0.0013619184,0.0007995146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011921324,0.00023167471,0.00026367587,0.0014209381,0.017492618,0.0041672355,0.00074298173,0.0010040284,0.005156912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036510397,0.0001738842,0.00014493658,0.0019320834,0.005497465,0.0011568735,0.0011084445,0.0022083763,0.00018029324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008295221,0.00011591648,0.111115545,0.0001896846,0.000042093696,0.0017134016,0.5577186,0.0005252575,0.0015453164,0.226295,0.034726057,0.06593017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011293749,0.00005456633,0.32966334,0.0007558051,0.000037236885,0.0006276597,0.3539951,0.000355882,0.00040638426,0.0032542723,0.31074238,0.00009612484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99706155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99860966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07058562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07058562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06263401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51213694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051730828","doi":"10.1080/13642980500032180","title":"Pushing under-18s onto the street: a Canadian charter analysis of Ontario's welfare-to-work scheme","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Denial; Minor (academic); Law; Political science; Fiduciary; Duty; Social work; State (computer science); Intervention (counseling); Work (physics); Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.03087847196912832,"score_gpt":0.3165752544350191,"score_spread":0.2856967824658908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051730828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5063302,0.001760798,0.0014618885,0.017213631,0.00015154532,0.00057674805,0.005354689,0.00006509981,0.46708545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9218835,0.0013893557,0.0015520639,0.00089461857,0.000028307979,0.00010403596,0.000846634,0.000035798977,0.0732656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689096,0.00023019094,0.00006281354,0.00020567933,0.0010770424,0.001533251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99566686,0.00037453906,0.00033120686,0.0001719249,0.0025112112,0.00094428525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014303277,0.00029737214,0.0002924694,0.0037268538,0.016978018,0.005194513,0.001670378,0.0011067585,0.00860106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045243213,0.0002864095,0.0004209984,0.0062174583,0.0037715952,0.0010402243,0.0016279636,0.001367917,0.00033336933],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012522972,0.00007639882,0.090778604,0.00017062017,0.000028493861,0.0014497667,0.074181356,0.0023945733,0.00081072625,0.6807156,0.10490466,0.04436398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047197125,0.00004974391,0.4236854,0.00036560767,0.0000963979,0.000267686,0.09686362,0.004315245,0.00039350806,0.012365574,0.4613909,0.00015913587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9987709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7961783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20382172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20584032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9234539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052246055","doi":"10.7202/1027786ar","title":"Settling the Fisheries: Pre-Confederation Crown Policy in Upper Canada and the Supreme Court's decisions in R. v. NIKAL and LEWIS","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Fishing; Law; Casual; Political science; Context (archaeology); Fishery; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.014573029034074913,"score_gpt":0.2583157527115432,"score_spread":0.2437427236774683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052246055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36580235,0.0105985,0.0012682946,0.1889523,0.000772781,0.00015342496,0.00047759546,0.00006980219,0.43190488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9071946,0.0023335596,0.0007876999,0.04008462,0.00013229127,0.000053494667,0.00008650197,0.000036348338,0.049290877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879409,0.0012110638,0.00032279504,0.0009095545,0.0037942224,0.0058214036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903938,0.003505198,0.0003949247,0.00025323723,0.0035304818,0.0019223127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007962782,0.0004056598,0.00060636085,0.0015642636,0.047556866,0.014079888,0.0038608392,0.010143871,0.0028921117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014974716,0.000649928,0.00063984573,0.0023699936,0.020110969,0.0021784448,0.0036958824,0.012398565,0.00023188222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078065146,0.00005498858,0.011700129,0.00008823469,0.00006315027,0.0022227804,0.057733037,0.0010782884,0.0010868906,0.84181064,0.067220934,0.016862817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015141837,0.00011205137,0.07731117,0.0016349467,0.0004748123,0.0007113434,0.1413713,0.003779695,0.0035440302,0.1238756,0.6459434,0.001090204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17687914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17687914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22781539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9547035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053262304","doi":"10.7202/043035ar","title":"La fiducie du Code civil : un sujet d'affrontement dans la communauté juridique québécoise","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.01176586361201631,"score_gpt":0.2522023982274293,"score_spread":0.24043653461541298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053262304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5173655,0.008754136,0.005161078,0.05025477,0.0009782892,0.00012271975,0.0009546306,0.00009696282,0.41631195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9272192,0.0014177511,0.00086569146,0.0015341083,0.000058523827,0.000058522597,0.00016113072,0.000038824397,0.068646304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753296,0.00064945215,0.000055242926,0.00025486425,0.0009076513,0.0005997041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960997,0.0013574103,0.00029247996,0.00015909642,0.001570402,0.0005208637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024928534,0.0003958632,0.00040439743,0.0015677477,0.020409875,0.00561109,0.001118345,0.0018471816,0.0076324954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070644077,0.0002922286,0.00014020056,0.002531404,0.014040287,0.0019213513,0.0021921468,0.003910133,0.00042646553],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054666954,0.000020363537,0.010034455,0.00023989982,0.000012903917,0.0010282423,0.40147874,0.00032500568,0.0009968324,0.480873,0.05768618,0.047249787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013461034,0.000020125726,0.040997297,0.0006371995,0.00002278211,0.0003181411,0.14597005,0.0004781843,0.00065314746,0.008317946,0.8024851,0.00008649963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96342844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98011106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93210715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.067892864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06865881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4925995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053797283","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00602_1.x","title":"Constitutional Rights and Social Welfare: A Comment on the Canadian <i>Chaoulli</i> Health Care Decision","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Deference; Supreme court; Political science; Jurisprudence; Law; Health care; Judicial deference; Social security; Legislature; Judicial review; Social Welfare; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0361121533054164,"score_gpt":0.323076463333312,"score_spread":0.28696431002789563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053797283","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041811825,0.007340509,0.00033329966,0.94344985,0.002637017,0.0000362635,0.00026620625,0.000035388606,0.04172023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07250974,0.0033880922,0.0005522241,0.89005214,0.0037875394,0.00006264412,0.00008566594,0.000059855414,0.029502073],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876687,0.0015307883,0.00035648755,0.0013333684,0.0050764363,0.0040342435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841302,0.009652476,0.0005994399,0.00038045458,0.0037448492,0.0014924406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012703669,0.0010246949,0.0015781884,0.0021638286,0.033465844,0.014235634,0.0081377225,0.06446041,0.0056335176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020478835,0.0011789555,0.0019440453,0.004287591,0.026762204,0.0039592227,0.0026945486,0.036252152,0.0009531398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005553146,0.000026729647,0.00079561374,0.000119435084,0.00002919175,0.00061170536,0.006026966,0.00032464552,0.0003299854,0.37743393,0.60895467,0.0052916124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001550442,0.000035999088,0.004158459,0.00065059547,0.00013802835,0.00019805903,0.0069509116,0.00065228186,0.00063673564,0.04881819,0.9373554,0.0002502982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9641997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.978365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10514109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10514109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12437588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7628555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056537542","doi":"10.1177/0959353504040296","title":"Equal Marriage/Le Droit Égal Au Mariage: A Personal View from Canada","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Feminism & Psychology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.035425613546729066,"score_gpt":0.3280157040067911,"score_spread":0.292590090460062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056537542","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25568944,0.016280541,0.0005076293,0.3986023,0.0019605749,0.000062572726,0.0003424544,0.000037628175,0.32651675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7245089,0.009425022,0.00043807307,0.06865986,0.00027032784,0.000028980832,0.000078094075,0.00013587221,0.1964549],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962681,0.00043481737,0.00005512155,0.00029261562,0.0007467115,0.0022027057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960251,0.00063422055,0.000119073695,0.00006113166,0.00093505485,0.002225413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019442599,0.00034713143,0.0006010056,0.0010555142,0.065847985,0.010251026,0.0018415143,0.0067021805,0.010470075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038770572,0.0004422307,0.00045067308,0.0027648166,0.010813535,0.0026456811,0.0038993498,0.0125381,0.00047780923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014366831,0.00015045673,0.015346218,0.00021998184,0.00006562089,0.003006222,0.31741548,0.00055390206,0.00083384255,0.27603304,0.3240716,0.062159963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001450977,0.000023372791,0.011516171,0.00030210963,0.00003158896,0.00038006227,0.33963332,0.00015809626,0.00026549443,0.0037975037,0.6437773,0.00010046191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098461345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.098461345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17235138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7143904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059075898","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/16.2.145","title":"Context and Inclusivity in Canada's Evolving Definition of the Family","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Charter; Commission; Context (archaeology); Legislature; Inclusion (mineral); Interdependence; Law; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.04102726335986378,"score_gpt":0.2980762770370748,"score_spread":0.257049013677211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059075898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2513765,0.038188938,0.0058666347,0.23758478,0.0016634284,0.0001374656,0.0006039455,0.00008568073,0.46449265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765697,0.004729262,0.0010009469,0.0064361026,0.00007150884,0.000030480509,0.000045267163,0.00003138796,0.011085392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98994267,0.002333136,0.0003548963,0.0008162455,0.0038377962,0.0027152286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897343,0.001886523,0.00047550705,0.00034372456,0.004308481,0.0032514941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053833905,0.00037843978,0.0006086804,0.0037072473,0.04022001,0.018374668,0.0029390824,0.003586597,0.0058650244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012227491,0.00042177425,0.00042900417,0.0066102874,0.04088388,0.0057305046,0.009227667,0.0061766915,0.0001868791],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032039326,0.000015453777,0.0044849664,0.0000755656,0.00001367512,0.00039076214,0.092552125,0.00047576777,0.0001938141,0.8637859,0.018067978,0.01991198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036157217,0.000031829793,0.029489705,0.0018429256,0.00004835363,0.00040303936,0.24326359,0.0009244167,0.00025917412,0.13447991,0.588939,0.00028188707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99413526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99628395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2006563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2006563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30435663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9271254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059781724","doi":"10.7202/042628ar","title":"Homosexualité et droits à l'égalité dans les Chartes canadienne et québécoise","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Homosexuality; Political science; Scope (computer science); Law; Human rights; Section (typography); Sociology","score_opus":0.01707463852393631,"score_gpt":0.27828434820392894,"score_spread":0.26120970967999263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059781724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5274469,0.019087039,0.0013192547,0.045538705,0.000499489,0.000042354306,0.00050759054,0.000039799917,0.4055189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96229064,0.0030900137,0.00026070402,0.0012572681,0.00004366289,0.000017161545,0.00004824462,0.000010266055,0.03298199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798584,0.0006570325,0.000039585524,0.00015993304,0.00060601154,0.0005515626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722123,0.0012598075,0.00028644621,0.000124471,0.00062969595,0.00047831336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001996041,0.00027233007,0.0003236015,0.001133677,0.009311019,0.0061048805,0.00046611615,0.0013753579,0.0056452593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050653857,0.00016037813,0.00019122826,0.0026288794,0.009436499,0.0019630792,0.0012139209,0.002772472,0.00018828672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047160564,0.00006742077,0.01641494,0.00012678823,0.000020337915,0.00041177837,0.19654424,0.0005295327,0.0004682282,0.71248853,0.020671653,0.052209307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024787245,0.00005206202,0.16898394,0.0006141941,0.000037231006,0.00037349766,0.21937138,0.0005808747,0.00044650308,0.021444406,0.587949,0.00012213399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9830071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99008596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044621333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044621333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03502223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32375193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059786336","doi":"10.7202/042443ar","title":"L'inconstitutionnalité des pouvoirs du protonotaire spécial","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Ultra vires; Political science; Statute; Legislature; Tribunal; Administration (probate law); Test (biology); Civil procedure; Economic Justice; Doctrine","score_opus":0.016582678824573035,"score_gpt":0.27831841000956276,"score_spread":0.2617357311849897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059786336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052777965,0.016755527,0.030575532,0.022248903,0.0064183045,0.00011530659,0.00066546944,0.0008587882,0.86958426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43503776,0.0051573925,0.006863738,0.0045585134,0.00212595,0.00019248671,0.0002901238,0.00032940455,0.5454446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99339527,0.0015201946,0.000224255,0.000859663,0.0032232169,0.00077739666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965245,0.0016311366,0.00025774713,0.0005272322,0.000827098,0.00023222931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004100796,0.00060500053,0.00060791336,0.001156939,0.0033679167,0.00889457,0.0011706381,0.0033479675,0.026920721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073959534,0.00054274674,0.0006953613,0.0008145436,0.0047353576,0.0037345225,0.0025049008,0.0047797277,0.0032304954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001195879,0.000032701493,0.0015763873,0.000105238454,0.0000145137465,0.00027696832,0.0012685444,0.0003956319,0.0023029256,0.903467,0.026682615,0.06375782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021611952,0.000060874,0.0023603323,0.00006810585,0.000005527404,0.00026316446,0.0002586556,0.00034637243,0.0016433472,0.014779987,0.9801634,0.000028462473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04025263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03804569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04025263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075312178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068978807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090058744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060088122","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0018","title":"Causation, Common Sense, and the Common Law: Replacing Unexamined Assumptions with What We Know about Male Violence against Women or from Jane Doe to Bonnie Mooney","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Common sense; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Criminology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02346392379539503,"score_gpt":0.2650374439093258,"score_spread":0.2415735201139308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060088122","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07515678,0.052463334,0.13087969,0.59469366,0.0026792353,0.000074148425,0.00009811246,0.0001069527,0.14384808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9620982,0.008431461,0.0074979775,0.016523017,0.0017680719,0.000103620754,0.000026097709,0.000041985517,0.0035095674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97468513,0.016636675,0.000780866,0.0025126743,0.003708834,0.0016757936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94176817,0.04847327,0.0028961934,0.0037688024,0.0022054454,0.0008880782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0313058,0.00066477695,0.0013108467,0.0043447637,0.009068307,0.011174332,0.0036662053,0.007820812,0.002112205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038538743,0.00065503956,0.0010166352,0.002445539,0.16761813,0.029037753,0.008951198,0.012104536,0.0002089072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003084366,0.000004157829,0.0001330695,0.00001651543,0.000003544079,0.00005673994,0.0024944062,0.0001251752,0.000013023518,0.9949818,0.00060584047,0.0015627624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042784,0.000005864791,0.00014904678,0.00012538412,0.0000041791477,0.00004416163,0.0018450927,0.00031586082,0.000051908428,0.9857379,0.01170578,0.00001043683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022042453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014391206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0313058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013776304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009279527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16556293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061815728","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr034","title":"Questions in Contemporary Medicine and the Philosophy of Charles Taylor: An Introduction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Epistemology; Theme (computing); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Politics; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.20226637052442897,"score_gpt":0.37637807841744847,"score_spread":0.1741117078930195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061815728","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030261935,0.5111504,0.014186426,0.32824063,0.023639303,0.00011880566,0.00011378042,0.000055700304,0.119468756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14616147,0.5227501,0.030664228,0.11690379,0.11758744,0.0007422746,0.00022014535,0.0002650727,0.06470557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949745,0.0029536975,0.00027495605,0.0003482061,0.001171008,0.0002776575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988315,0.009962507,0.00034098083,0.00019151911,0.00087392074,0.00031611294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005699183,0.00085446774,0.00096723286,0.004823949,0.0054276073,0.006483089,0.001433881,0.008078003,0.0042945324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010000414,0.00057162833,0.0007706702,0.0040566646,0.020545969,0.011227879,0.0031064542,0.009362726,0.0011005863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001893534,0.000042552983,0.00014190092,0.00042275,0.0000056397553,0.000115131406,0.00855469,0.00025767818,0.00014457939,0.884761,0.08353967,0.021995513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048357238,0.000016206632,0.00018308955,0.00076140277,0.0000029865394,0.00015027837,0.0016857319,0.00020290764,0.00006054235,0.2830544,0.7138615,0.000016142309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004144311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032357324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008078003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077869818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054696715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056498706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062369876","doi":"10.7202/039649ar","title":"Liberté de choix et protection juridique des conjoints de fait en cas de rupture : difficile exercice de jonglerie","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025196966567499333,"score_gpt":0.29717048251511724,"score_spread":0.2719735159476179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062369876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39010528,0.009191042,0.006389153,0.13572389,0.0015870513,0.00020409474,0.0006189285,0.00009927323,0.45608133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7956217,0.0018569651,0.0014431893,0.009898862,0.00013922452,0.00008207598,0.00013624877,0.000050219816,0.19077143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940289,0.001263726,0.000140754,0.0006010288,0.0017433482,0.0022222716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993457,0.0014262847,0.00050943554,0.00040199677,0.0024247856,0.0017803328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050075133,0.00027643977,0.0004758865,0.0010434133,0.019607008,0.006875633,0.0016644518,0.0039510024,0.016862627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012966297,0.0004702292,0.00047642278,0.0010006317,0.010214149,0.0026934901,0.004259438,0.0058383252,0.0011296517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017974315,0.00010353743,0.06936399,0.00025333563,0.00006996058,0.0020089801,0.12263961,0.0007112359,0.0017050724,0.6055515,0.10308742,0.09432562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045560962,0.00010920119,0.10339201,0.0008418991,0.000066888,0.00064693956,0.078181215,0.0009275704,0.0011484713,0.017299483,0.7971652,0.0001754398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89330363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9644453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89330363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03735635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07104238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27104056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063483426","doi":"10.7202/042307ar","title":"L'article 4 du Statut de Westminster et la souveraineté du Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Law; Statute; Political science; Statutory law; Declaration; Legislation; Politics","score_opus":0.006170269590722302,"score_gpt":0.24288898574947945,"score_spread":0.23671871615875714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063483426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026112262,0.02937869,0.005625575,0.09437369,0.004231506,0.00025817152,0.0035109967,0.0003055926,0.8362035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.273169,0.012921706,0.005062643,0.03672758,0.0012207271,0.00028511076,0.0009789814,0.00015712595,0.6694771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917692,0.0008053039,0.00025902563,0.0007094579,0.0044722613,0.0019848277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967449,0.0014174146,0.00016501322,0.0002065291,0.0011519368,0.0003141199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003059637,0.0006451691,0.0006905303,0.0017687406,0.0073937206,0.012131046,0.0015998482,0.0072432174,0.01493089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007998317,0.00070275815,0.0009105197,0.0027556468,0.0058078356,0.0018935069,0.0014548573,0.0050224173,0.0012125815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003815689,0.000020672547,0.0013452538,0.00010656929,0.000016865217,0.00018440111,0.0015774168,0.00052777946,0.000438934,0.90569794,0.07797049,0.012075567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034090128,0.000018248418,0.0057462696,0.00025147814,0.000025294159,0.0000635166,0.00063085515,0.00046183978,0.00050189474,0.016156277,0.97605115,0.00005905089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97357213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9787361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06850493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06850493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13015214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4970404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063574972","doi":"10.7202/038178ar","title":"Between Exclusion and Assimilation: Experimentalizing Multiculturalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Multiculturalism; Sociology; Reasonable accommodation; Epistemology; Charter; Political science; Democracy; Law and economics; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06003431359858567,"score_gpt":0.35270728800830425,"score_spread":0.29267297440971857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063574972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6708384,0.0010699171,0.0164015,0.017214071,0.0003218771,0.00021552693,0.000023678487,0.000041744606,0.29387325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99542326,0.00017535317,0.0016018874,0.00069336855,0.0000405651,0.00018021758,0.0000055350633,0.0000112774105,0.0018685288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97813046,0.018530443,0.00021377495,0.0011090111,0.0010418142,0.0009745079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97355574,0.02074266,0.0015894783,0.0026143338,0.0006794064,0.0008183763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020498807,0.00045435037,0.0006860871,0.0012418044,0.011015586,0.007968449,0.0024429266,0.0020330565,0.004093064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01922544,0.00033006808,0.0005605991,0.0009829341,0.086892985,0.008037395,0.019609919,0.004310777,0.00017018255],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011212136,0.00031498156,0.001158574,0.000068215755,0.0000107960495,0.00013528972,0.11804755,0.00022937525,0.0006762206,0.8723957,0.00035745554,0.0064936774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024257296,0.0005276307,0.002168596,0.00025682704,0.00003568546,0.00015457465,0.123049356,0.0015292199,0.0021377176,0.832167,0.037679162,0.0000516313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045635547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004941114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99543643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063773617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004940059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.108409405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064013856","doi":"10.1163/157181902401737644","title":"F. Soetermeer, Livres et Juristes au Moyen Age","year":2002,"lang":"nl","type":"article","venue":"Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d Histoire du Droit / The Legal History Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Inversa Systems (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.048291288994928065,"score_gpt":0.2666084079801439,"score_spread":0.21831711898521583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064013856","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013946458,0.48990774,0.0022647385,0.1598918,0.00775229,0.000027850676,0.00050039054,0.000056953333,0.3256517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38872644,0.24995454,0.0029876286,0.02795034,0.0055928305,0.00010869139,0.00050255563,0.00018632477,0.32399058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982132,0.00086683873,0.00007623864,0.0002014289,0.00049555924,0.00014680214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974827,0.0017463976,0.00021897569,0.00010693305,0.0003268293,0.000118102274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019824754,0.0002500866,0.0003795403,0.001378398,0.00296386,0.0037786034,0.0004712588,0.0020280338,0.028047644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073549557,0.00022964088,0.00017577808,0.00163456,0.0033810877,0.0051011103,0.001375037,0.0024061392,0.0027484363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080900354,0.00003059424,0.001863298,0.0006042102,0.0000131747165,0.00028951862,0.007427754,0.00022521784,0.00029224134,0.5673517,0.3287338,0.09308761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009048172,0.000015226585,0.0021788343,0.00056374405,0.0000055522337,0.0001627411,0.0031518699,0.00005301631,0.00016680628,0.028575407,0.96510905,0.000008724001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017731382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028733393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028047644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018001411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032067057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09382874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064309533","doi":"10.1080/0953996032000164715","title":"Privative clauses in special education legislative schemes: are they constitutional under the <i>Canadian Charter?</i>","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education and the Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Appeal; Tribunal; Legislature; Standard of review; Statute; Judicial review","score_opus":0.0315993558873076,"score_gpt":0.31709915084016643,"score_spread":0.2854997949528588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064309533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06807961,0.0048073265,0.02219666,0.08664095,0.0013340078,0.00046430147,0.00080940867,0.0003052194,0.81536245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8358364,0.0021077637,0.012690416,0.024985014,0.0004728221,0.0003503127,0.0003407723,0.00010402954,0.123112544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98248255,0.00193061,0.00056883984,0.0014980917,0.008376701,0.005143112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867225,0.0050894786,0.0010254605,0.0013569206,0.00487938,0.00092623074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010931201,0.0003309538,0.0004735651,0.0015671656,0.014180536,0.011700297,0.002506952,0.005872252,0.007628697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029783538,0.00079379376,0.00061770587,0.0023736502,0.023250794,0.0055471123,0.0030318378,0.007438403,0.0005753858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005540524,0.000005192674,0.00029644894,0.000015987349,0.0000017149181,0.000023136166,0.0012922952,0.000109930435,0.000109891545,0.98907834,0.005609233,0.0034523485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011845977,0.0000638984,0.01787857,0.0006659764,0.000115382085,0.0001609333,0.006549314,0.0028035042,0.0028042486,0.37431893,0.594262,0.00025883026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9202356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9462176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94712126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052878715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.115645654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3836637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066896834","doi":"10.7202/1019052ar","title":"La primauté du droit, l’égalité devant la loi et autres « principes non écrits de notre constitution »","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020484115229888827,"score_gpt":0.29281962588639876,"score_spread":0.27233551065650996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066896834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040617518,0.0036966086,0.011156826,0.028700413,0.00047150574,0.00008692567,0.00017008932,0.00009012457,0.9150099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8452898,0.0020307354,0.0044825724,0.003957947,0.0003070221,0.00017418744,0.000113480055,0.00009329977,0.1435509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921611,0.0026972496,0.00032401722,0.0012602657,0.0020717029,0.0014856413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935899,0.0021838439,0.00088492595,0.0011191729,0.0012813259,0.00094092765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058770557,0.0004415643,0.00049376686,0.0018508504,0.0101101,0.015460671,0.001693842,0.004041882,0.0113305515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009732914,0.0004961816,0.0006256382,0.0013160286,0.031558756,0.005302169,0.006331072,0.006144556,0.0019191297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059680087,0.0000062556655,0.0006677577,0.000026078402,0.000004166468,0.00003309771,0.0039030542,0.0000633491,0.00008684117,0.9902407,0.0017087026,0.0032541105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030137628,0.00005561198,0.008491659,0.00043756148,0.00003892511,0.00027674748,0.008415518,0.00036547182,0.000744381,0.40608898,0.57496774,0.00008726053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.065027185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.091189034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9896901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010309862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022719748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12929738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069593868","doi":"10.7202/042671ar","title":"Effets civils et organisation conventionnelle de l'union homosexuelle","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Property rights; Political science; Public order; Sociology; Law; Welfare economics; Business; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.011867375966667253,"score_gpt":0.2723764020536215,"score_spread":0.26050902608695425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069593868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09436411,0.005841319,0.0029687048,0.032986052,0.00040572643,0.000061028768,0.000071737944,0.000036979545,0.8632643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88805175,0.0029887697,0.0012844822,0.0034084062,0.00023547378,0.000074956515,0.00004508575,0.00003393124,0.103877135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9815289,0.009361454,0.00028138555,0.0007134752,0.005262686,0.0028521188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801412,0.010514642,0.0023871525,0.0013832207,0.0031330371,0.0024407927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012888634,0.000337403,0.00022574219,0.0015751768,0.010947695,0.010012251,0.0009856194,0.0036162538,0.015743203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020873299,0.00030949403,0.0002631199,0.0015740327,0.017863574,0.0022069823,0.0043803295,0.0032162885,0.00092780474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003199032,0.00005533449,0.00570827,0.000061798295,0.000012714158,0.0001080009,0.013117963,0.0002391662,0.00027064534,0.93908924,0.008697653,0.032607213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093101255,0.00015014758,0.080412626,0.0009523786,0.00003186219,0.00037066283,0.03630746,0.0007041535,0.0009285994,0.1338086,0.74615884,0.00008145721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26619515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3341424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26619515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016367342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020548455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52929145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069723000","doi":"10.1163/1571811042802019","title":"Our Treaty, Our Inherent Right to Self-Government: An Overview of the Nisga'a Final Agreement","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal on Minority and Group Rights","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Legislature; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Pluralism (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06995791471756657,"score_gpt":0.3599251918859901,"score_spread":0.2899672771684235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069723000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034730046,0.04358692,0.01324081,0.034837343,0.002260603,0.00008168932,0.00012986294,0.00006640078,0.90232337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52408224,0.099923395,0.017049547,0.022660568,0.0045450265,0.00038945605,0.0006900709,0.00024054796,0.33041918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99246675,0.0022956799,0.00033580474,0.00046186784,0.003372427,0.0010674326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978308,0.0008919427,0.00008903271,0.00013580335,0.0008812856,0.00017120865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005272444,0.0004253259,0.00045594914,0.00463915,0.008643373,0.012970491,0.0014030988,0.0055094543,0.004779879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048212996,0.00027860573,0.00052928017,0.0056179077,0.016062265,0.0044968063,0.0027531388,0.006373948,0.00075742573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001495983,0.00000392586,0.00003166185,0.00003062133,8.176121e-7,0.00002047839,0.0006606299,0.00017000115,0.000025524541,0.9843992,0.009610463,0.0050450955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020419227,0.0000060824023,0.0002972468,0.00034888185,0.0000026204782,0.000043338314,0.0009851633,0.000265568,0.00006738885,0.19636458,0.8016008,0.000016191318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34830916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25836328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65169084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030340983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040607266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69256353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070221634","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2013.865525","title":"The Judas Within: A Look at the Sexual Abuse Crisis in the Catholic Church","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"John Jay College of Criminal Justice","keywords":"Sexual abuse; Criminology; Psychology; Theology; Political science; Philosophy; Medicine; Medical emergency; Poison control; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.08772144611088523,"score_gpt":0.38744481117542645,"score_spread":0.2997233650645412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070221634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56079257,0.019091917,0.0007377593,0.34085363,0.0015511407,0.000077632176,0.000038997736,0.000016266664,0.076840036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9587579,0.0075739645,0.00033352134,0.0238606,0.00065762707,0.00003793137,0.000020807405,0.000023480761,0.008734194],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968923,0.0022018095,0.0000378545,0.000059366022,0.00018039234,0.000628275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967596,0.0013869597,0.00039467873,0.00007110731,0.00037725086,0.001010374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034164267,0.0002906559,0.00038078465,0.0018039752,0.01640491,0.0059474343,0.0014039001,0.004921261,0.0025750776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004923945,0.00035767222,0.00040120137,0.0017215164,0.015556034,0.004973231,0.004804385,0.009076884,0.00017691728],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008233228,0.000302951,0.017128056,0.0003706209,0.000026630272,0.008565413,0.7170687,0.000421458,0.0004672103,0.20009972,0.036324836,0.019142099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008772405,0.00006800329,0.017015085,0.00042238602,0.000009718978,0.0007912875,0.8944203,0.00038468034,0.000075717,0.011705915,0.07507209,0.000026033033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059585232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13650925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059585232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010402029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008069839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11847681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070992217","doi":"10.1093/jcs/css091","title":"Child Sexual Abuse &amp; the Catholic Church: Gender, Power, and Organizational Culture","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Church and State","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presupposition; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Power (physics); Sexual abuse; Brother; Narrative; Gender studies; Social work; Criminology; Law; Epistemology; Political science; History; Anthropology; Poison control; Medicine; Literature","score_opus":0.033320511216658376,"score_gpt":0.30675980042599527,"score_spread":0.2734392892093369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070992217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6091161,0.029214043,0.00069173676,0.06607194,0.00040471758,0.00007218966,0.0000645776,0.000012578043,0.29435208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9712009,0.00813071,0.00040537652,0.003003581,0.000111078036,0.00005128651,0.00002313082,0.000013103958,0.017060854],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983388,0.0010835112,0.00002445419,0.000067238536,0.00024923703,0.00023680925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986625,0.00069183926,0.00020919417,0.000058288908,0.0000986843,0.0002795254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019508194,0.0001602838,0.00021461991,0.000771309,0.0057803257,0.004519445,0.00054285227,0.00082523434,0.005230347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024050898,0.00019632185,0.00009853197,0.0013493026,0.012214436,0.001953745,0.0033085882,0.0021450345,0.00023702525],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022526146,0.00006598986,0.025713146,0.00011807574,0.000007826149,0.0010235253,0.7488979,0.00006858431,0.00029708567,0.17330259,0.01623126,0.034251418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049390082,0.00003164191,0.04487064,0.00041215395,0.000003263019,0.0008885753,0.78579557,0.00007374835,0.00010493146,0.010022782,0.15777725,0.000014520235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025697539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08950396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025697539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038744484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002661277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051095903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072348734","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00661.x","title":"ASSESSING MUTUAL PARTNER‐ABUSE CLAIMS IN CHILD CUSTODY AND ACCESS CASES","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lawson Health Research Institute; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Child custody; Power (physics); Domestic violence; Psychology; Child abuse; Criminology; Law; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; Medical emergency; Geography","score_opus":0.11242184705250083,"score_gpt":0.42720280270329497,"score_spread":0.3147809556507941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072348734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96422076,0.011175927,0.00073398225,0.0010074063,0.00006593762,0.00019920382,0.00009061746,0.000004633797,0.022501454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99448264,0.0032795789,0.0009893293,0.00015576651,0.00003896195,0.000086452164,0.000098238845,0.0000026005428,0.00086633203],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96173185,0.020669188,0.0038338788,0.0011546587,0.010222732,0.0023875874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9172845,0.052531846,0.014797303,0.0014743815,0.012891466,0.0010205645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034938496,0.00027361783,0.0007543723,0.014987676,0.0055615352,0.0036415653,0.001752219,0.001751958,0.0013312255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.108980305,0.0004487701,0.00045872922,0.010593114,0.0034106309,0.0040188767,0.0056830635,0.0012264234,0.00017109663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045827232,0.00028261816,0.46231818,0.0032728813,0.0003918417,0.014262997,0.3208976,0.0014348605,0.0025055623,0.034367256,0.0038247604,0.15598321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003905359,0.0005707491,0.5877088,0.0021622325,0.00044059323,0.008921341,0.35072038,0.0016314285,0.0034640506,0.010130108,0.034097828,0.00011344392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048486356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1561047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048486356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053779907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005309276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18477464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072697296","doi":"10.1163/1569163053084261","title":"Intersubjectivity and the `Revival of Death': Toward a Critique of Sovereign Individualism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Sociology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Intersubjectivity; Individualism; Spirituality; Narrative; Sociology; Feeling; Sovereignty; Inclusion (mineral); Expression (computer science); Psychoanalysis; Gender studies; Epistemology; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Social science; Medicine; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.059321723411530594,"score_gpt":0.3856121410315472,"score_spread":0.3262904176200166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072697296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.117967784,0.014972986,0.04983005,0.14782557,0.0020912236,0.00007612699,0.000032719086,0.00010385241,0.6670998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98511696,0.001412236,0.0014581807,0.00385598,0.0005707201,0.0000687091,0.000008776323,0.000054537544,0.007453898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826454,0.013566506,0.00030864167,0.0009422348,0.0014990547,0.0010381123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98166466,0.014409828,0.0011934699,0.0013414621,0.0008214913,0.0005689919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016794337,0.0005612591,0.0008332894,0.001601161,0.00981343,0.012950738,0.0032593883,0.0073592323,0.0017964467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015537892,0.0003876248,0.00070364476,0.0012330854,0.15078698,0.013416719,0.01128229,0.013458542,0.00027904115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027028736,0.0000025431523,0.000025755913,0.000014263227,0.0000010366496,0.000024871619,0.01962878,0.000038522947,0.000015763308,0.9794868,0.0003269673,0.00043201607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011453253,0.000015460337,0.00009514583,0.00012293168,0.0000046345726,0.00009411514,0.015953347,0.00026318678,0.00010945768,0.939136,0.044183556,0.000010639058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020392274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014585423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016794337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006290015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045776367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08881801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073405365","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.2.485","title":"The Québec <i>Crime Victims Compensation Act</i>: When the Clock Is Ticking against Victims of Intra-Familial Sexual Abuse","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sexual abuse; Humanities; Ethnology; Art; Sociology; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.020846689618878037,"score_gpt":0.25139539734196376,"score_spread":0.23054870772308572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073405365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15053847,0.01499627,0.0028189975,0.22729094,0.0050343745,0.0016975312,0.003512546,0.0003805122,0.59373033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4203441,0.007178806,0.005120021,0.109601535,0.0005501385,0.00065769017,0.0013440443,0.000095757125,0.45510784],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974591,0.00031597615,0.00013517025,0.00013282917,0.0009110907,0.001045852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99565434,0.00054365303,0.00044329496,0.00021256365,0.0021034384,0.0010426274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002733885,0.00038064926,0.0002810034,0.0012834693,0.0070592314,0.0026977104,0.001918286,0.0050716405,0.007886819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067326827,0.00036846634,0.00037465806,0.0011109075,0.002440874,0.00079115597,0.0013535202,0.0034798477,0.0011719894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012130968,0.00018063578,0.04905155,0.0004550621,0.00005228926,0.0010356464,0.018299041,0.0005785278,0.0026300945,0.091286354,0.7091335,0.12717612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053467047,0.00009196321,0.12181885,0.00052916806,0.000056655048,0.00025533352,0.011074108,0.00033404157,0.00080791826,0.001272161,0.863604,0.00010236826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96932095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030679047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028742904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09197438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20854533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073609679","doi":"10.1353/can.2005.0058","title":"The Canadian Federalist Experiment: From Defiant Monarchy to Reluctant Republic (review)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Historical Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Monarchy; Charter; Politics; Federalism; Constitution; Law; Supreme court; Ideology; Scrutiny; History; The Republic; Political science; Economic history; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.05492002141800827,"score_gpt":0.31712500840416646,"score_spread":0.2622049869861582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073609679","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006429997,0.98949605,0.00001616684,0.0065083457,0.0018193878,0.000024838882,0.00023173756,0.000007683566,0.0018314118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019157572,0.9818641,0.00005911407,0.012985261,0.00095915067,0.00005732024,0.0002919837,0.000007761314,0.0018594223],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772674,0.00024684996,0.00018804608,0.0001887988,0.0014231536,0.00022643458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897059,0.0024334735,0.00095298095,0.00013651335,0.0058995094,0.0008716253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003492507,0.0010129976,0.0021705602,0.0051070885,0.0017678686,0.0037005662,0.002728115,0.0026391752,0.01659822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01195031,0.00053278304,0.001027566,0.009897624,0.0031755932,0.0019998203,0.0011891049,0.0031793916,0.0020755492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012876406,0.000016178526,0.00035504837,0.03591918,0.00017385196,0.000060427214,0.000120336255,0.00007406402,0.00009440232,0.0026045425,0.82825816,0.132195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012070085,0.000037237616,0.005722276,0.052765395,0.00041684153,0.00015368174,0.00025352943,0.000036037458,0.00006597835,0.00076069025,0.9396081,0.00005954863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.455919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6729518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.544081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018587494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06367397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9065305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074705882","doi":"10.7202/042227ar","title":"L'abus de pouvoir des représentants légaux dans le droit familial du Québec","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Power of attorney; Power (physics); Law; TUTOR; Abuse of power; Duty; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.01159349312615602,"score_gpt":0.26017123278531357,"score_spread":0.24857773965915755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074705882","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81378794,0.0041390285,0.002424752,0.0140737565,0.0003742251,0.00007277334,0.0007508259,0.00011106836,0.16426565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8479464,0.0011482493,0.00073315535,0.0007909455,0.00003203259,0.000025210715,0.00013519253,0.000025042902,0.14916387],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987685,0.00025517578,0.00002705617,0.00015184353,0.00032459525,0.00047280968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752825,0.00042624623,0.00020436836,0.000091904476,0.00078283093,0.00096642395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012611414,0.00034147192,0.00027932037,0.00093268184,0.011111634,0.0037246728,0.00090972136,0.001425199,0.020525232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003270476,0.00025994246,0.0003376141,0.0011936966,0.002235332,0.001041893,0.0010256261,0.0020045596,0.0010281256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004537053,0.000364761,0.18907845,0.00037980545,0.00013114745,0.009618022,0.18130894,0.0027829353,0.007609323,0.22878303,0.10331857,0.27617148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034374112,0.00012504052,0.27547196,0.00041273015,0.00005135114,0.0019540966,0.075453795,0.0015299998,0.0015408149,0.0019850829,0.6413228,0.000118083124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98385346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98919463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047055833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047055833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02941669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34141558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075057681","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00660.x","title":"MOVIN' ON","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05976005348880054,"score_gpt":0.3591633051035167,"score_spread":0.29940325161471615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075057681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032751365,0.0025732766,0.0002704807,0.0030868987,0.00076952757,0.00006451575,0.0005516038,0.00009657097,0.9893119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022443138,0.0011144005,0.00024496278,0.004060466,0.0001162418,0.000039776387,0.00028626682,0.00004106259,0.9716537],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989624,0.00008394586,0.000027948416,0.0001328369,0.00041554018,0.00037728675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945635,0.00008035483,0.000028748176,0.00004177103,0.00030026765,0.00009260099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006347331,0.00030540163,0.00025821905,0.0013036254,0.0063858633,0.0031674737,0.001086969,0.0017776748,0.19105402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016605383,0.00018317785,0.00041287547,0.00092415354,0.0010422728,0.0008365207,0.0021057562,0.0014510958,0.02853774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069497626,0.000032265933,0.0019817762,0.00022844574,0.000012024815,0.0006326832,0.001706488,0.00012146856,0.0008459679,0.17338188,0.68327844,0.13770907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033516214,0.0000070702417,0.0016261154,0.000068597714,0.0000035689225,0.000047506423,0.00027195193,0.000023436623,0.00011076047,0.000677836,0.9971559,0.0000037883817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44586343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67555237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44586343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063565914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008326792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077420415","doi":"10.5539/ach.v6n1p83","title":"The Aesthetic University, the Market University, and the Battle for the Soul of Beida","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Culture and History","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Battle; Transcendence (philosophy); Aesthetics; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Art; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.010780960904812729,"score_gpt":0.20536349837202145,"score_spread":0.19458253746720872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077420415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39611706,0.007455035,0.0038441718,0.032932583,0.00038226988,0.000024948267,0.000025825559,0.00006399761,0.55915415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98977613,0.00048218257,0.00035003485,0.00039505496,0.000034113025,0.000010589635,0.0000033449119,0.000007683689,0.008940798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932504,0.0003218958,0.000016031383,0.000068209214,0.00008684198,0.000181953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943024,0.00017425299,0.00008394514,0.00008753138,0.00006866198,0.00015532858],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013797553,0.00024461432,0.00019853088,0.0010467556,0.00994265,0.0066986512,0.0004147156,0.0015028529,0.0037580726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014187058,0.00012370253,0.00013935023,0.0011509142,0.02446077,0.005178573,0.003187399,0.003071152,0.0001817001],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016853122,0.0000070089372,0.0006099671,0.000023130013,0.0000011784291,0.00006794004,0.017400824,0.0000775711,0.00013536746,0.9738807,0.0013137141,0.006465837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035294746,0.00010183647,0.008701658,0.00043053893,0.000020523728,0.0005293008,0.11700827,0.0013775405,0.00096131297,0.42682782,0.44393453,0.00007137129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010566719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02255741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99005735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008735828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053092553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0633831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078745783","doi":"10.1111/j.0265-8240.2004.00166.x","title":"Regulation of Cohabitation and Marriage in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Supreme court; Law; Constitutional right; Argument (complex analysis); Institution; Marital status; Political science; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.014887897701583329,"score_gpt":0.2938061912706551,"score_spread":0.2789182935690718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078745783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31372568,0.015079121,0.005366112,0.08116805,0.0012655349,0.00051056,0.0023313842,0.00022807236,0.58032554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.829757,0.0078351265,0.00464281,0.014359422,0.0000886119,0.00015137193,0.000651282,0.000049865735,0.14246449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975228,0.00017866158,0.000059837173,0.00025875494,0.0011080878,0.00087189325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729294,0.00018318965,0.00010939087,0.00006812591,0.0014541353,0.00089225115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012095984,0.00020096201,0.00023361939,0.0010815051,0.012472954,0.0029639418,0.0020512256,0.0011885075,0.0066475957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002726581,0.0002850683,0.00039224493,0.0016105728,0.0026831746,0.00047924812,0.0019157787,0.0023622876,0.00029819235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019004851,0.00022909082,0.08642199,0.00038586385,0.000091913986,0.001401018,0.020908933,0.002845765,0.0068751113,0.53680706,0.16798064,0.17586248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067232126,0.00009104066,0.14983849,0.00032415593,0.00009990196,0.00022746461,0.012373804,0.0027198403,0.0023671002,0.009637715,0.8220613,0.00019185813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12707625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12707625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21614666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9220071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083640649","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0019","title":"The Promise of Brooks v. Canada Safeway Ltd : Those Who Bear Children Should Not Be Disadvantaged","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Geography; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029629888095780432,"score_gpt":0.27190350239811306,"score_spread":0.24227361430233263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083640649","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047586672,0.005836573,0.0016770331,0.6023756,0.0018718732,0.00006347941,0.00023323846,0.00007901014,0.3402766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54788756,0.0031263016,0.0014371035,0.25885293,0.00060318655,0.00008900736,0.000094811025,0.00007446452,0.18783465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937022,0.0006348182,0.000093886054,0.0005003475,0.0022293131,0.0028394875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995876,0.0010515221,0.00026519079,0.00017930636,0.0010093581,0.0016185987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037920605,0.00034679953,0.00037241678,0.00040721058,0.017484393,0.0069713313,0.0021826841,0.012937828,0.0059561376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01072593,0.0004434416,0.00032933097,0.0004778076,0.015311824,0.002930547,0.003884842,0.011467613,0.00062619714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070126946,0.000022155746,0.0051517095,0.00007980957,0.000017305472,0.0010120238,0.013297558,0.00026016004,0.001000073,0.73893154,0.21972138,0.020436132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052827552,0.00006046413,0.009424039,0.00047399924,0.00005323193,0.00038076143,0.016075222,0.00024661684,0.0007623411,0.054746922,0.917556,0.00016762115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9384707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97342753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06152928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03225581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1253163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2340334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084412400","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v17i6.06","title":"The liability of churches for the historical sexual assault of children by priests","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Law; Supreme court; Liability; Damages; Test (biology); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Political science; Tort; Psychology","score_opus":0.012536297173417258,"score_gpt":0.2760796712263531,"score_spread":0.2635433740529358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084412400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7163461,0.0021561345,0.0009421386,0.016039109,0.00024076496,0.00007233344,0.000109650005,0.000018083687,0.26407576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98657817,0.0003875017,0.0001938646,0.0019712292,0.000062582505,0.00001664582,0.000016649328,0.0000029993053,0.010770257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743134,0.0006492182,0.000121216544,0.00022759751,0.00062919286,0.00094150135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751914,0.0009250956,0.0003075386,0.00032846455,0.00043577148,0.00048400517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023172563,0.00015451049,0.00022451267,0.00074720616,0.0069648535,0.0029493454,0.0011892959,0.005345839,0.0035215071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00837136,0.0004138602,0.0005254175,0.0002456335,0.008358825,0.0016281612,0.00346644,0.005976108,0.00034037646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002353601,0.00016252651,0.068283595,0.00012746699,0.00009794413,0.014555736,0.04799309,0.00074795005,0.004265761,0.81282306,0.017732818,0.032974765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026139707,0.0011233831,0.27871314,0.0022436967,0.0005122433,0.031057509,0.08173463,0.0031752782,0.011194373,0.14755712,0.4419528,0.00047445024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10435314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19883242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10435314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034273395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054455264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20749146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084749280","doi":"10.1177/000842980002900406","title":"Same-sex relationships, religious traditions, marriage and the law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Legalization; Sociology; Homosexuality; State (computer science); Law; Same sex; Gender studies; Variety (cybernetics); Political science","score_opus":0.08810149047896293,"score_gpt":0.3692927127770868,"score_spread":0.2811912222981239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084749280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2169042,0.346376,0.0010813057,0.045477923,0.0008237751,0.000021904576,0.000049298505,0.000020516738,0.38924506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.923507,0.06355454,0.00030526205,0.0027801108,0.00064652495,0.000013972444,0.000019930965,0.000006732371,0.009165928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911994,0.000573176,0.000023635386,0.000057331625,0.00010727754,0.000118692995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984078,0.000889879,0.00028477947,0.000048419224,0.0000874034,0.00028177054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010227794,0.000113015616,0.00017844324,0.0010081207,0.003831579,0.0027289053,0.00039472876,0.0012814978,0.0057351827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023941577,0.0001187009,0.0000894171,0.0016236402,0.014611468,0.0022735817,0.0017316039,0.0015771586,0.00032104758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002953235,0.00013906797,0.011762129,0.0002339542,0.000010385729,0.00074690307,0.04371671,0.00014293235,0.000129396,0.87091625,0.0077514714,0.064421356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003143515,0.00020659633,0.059836533,0.0017344177,0.000022846101,0.0020705927,0.0894178,0.00023781213,0.00017582548,0.29670697,0.54951817,0.00004096141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011896645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021004759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011896645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018595797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016931527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023654759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084906033","doi":"10.1080/00071005.2012.742276","title":"<i>Law, Religious Freedoms and Education in Europe</i>. Edited by Myriam Hunter-Henin","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Educational Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02040286517791079,"score_gpt":0.33079078239016935,"score_spread":0.31038791721225856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084906033","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00064619863,0.82407784,0.0003911283,0.06290383,0.06287674,0.000013884153,0.00030429015,0.000053562013,0.048732568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022647215,0.7391193,0.0009787378,0.015702475,0.05754548,0.000064180575,0.00056006346,0.00015865074,0.16322389],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959856,0.00015891061,0.000028779948,0.00004803188,0.00012945068,0.000036225952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883,0.0007352565,0.00008077577,0.000040824332,0.0001818242,0.00013136271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089150306,0.0016594012,0.0011573287,0.0024000395,0.0016488157,0.004165934,0.0009282504,0.002585301,0.0118346205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002017891,0.00047376673,0.00047917984,0.0032625238,0.0021024784,0.0041058427,0.0018968777,0.0036316223,0.0027504861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016738484,0.0000117336085,0.00014248323,0.0002972853,0.000008068091,0.000059071655,0.0008323471,0.00010874881,0.00005009332,0.015515887,0.951182,0.031775422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007319605,0.000012211291,0.002035815,0.0012508375,0.000006933355,0.00021402162,0.0015023024,0.00011252717,0.00008101165,0.010316595,0.98444474,0.000015712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014603822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03725833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014603822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017403258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021429362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039590776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085046257","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2008.00020.x","title":"Aboriginal policy reform and the subsidiarity principle: A case study of the division of matrimonial real property on Canadian Indian reserves","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Legislation; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.046500890073287005,"score_gpt":0.34658730027169066,"score_spread":0.30008641019840365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085046257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82941175,0.0015914956,0.00087095384,0.014483782,0.00008855958,0.00028190488,0.00011325516,0.000022008806,0.15313627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98378885,0.00083195674,0.00082584657,0.0009384978,0.000016733204,0.000056862653,0.000039935672,0.000009161749,0.013492231],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941659,0.0015465142,0.00009194687,0.0002717837,0.0011929586,0.0027309135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961869,0.0013007539,0.00029701868,0.00020791995,0.0011574806,0.0008498993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039732167,0.00046656025,0.00046049067,0.0017318149,0.040195286,0.0051440136,0.003194555,0.0035205649,0.0043161386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005991821,0.0003021245,0.0005181086,0.0033609567,0.011486244,0.0012989907,0.003963424,0.004312169,0.00021467394],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017829443,0.00054950616,0.040880825,0.0005074654,0.00007601597,0.019283883,0.5085971,0.004579967,0.0022707526,0.35025015,0.024950923,0.047875248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050873747,0.00012454807,0.05295982,0.00045339295,0.0001128197,0.0010879382,0.7272361,0.002136975,0.0010653227,0.004588731,0.21008307,0.00010040116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98376817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99287146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13620403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13620403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13903116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98823404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086132450","doi":"10.5840/envirophil20118219","title":"Ideas and Practices in the Critique of Consumerism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Philosophy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consumerism; Applied philosophy; Environmental ethics; General interest; Sociology; Contemporary philosophy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06369820562877371,"score_gpt":0.32403736290837,"score_spread":0.2603391572795963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086132450","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0700038,0.021699967,0.022713525,0.41718203,0.0014884941,0.00004004149,0.000053400956,0.000055978613,0.46676266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96445036,0.002508762,0.0033919183,0.012721186,0.001108331,0.00007083955,0.000012103002,0.00007883046,0.015657634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908502,0.0067811245,0.00014012484,0.000580339,0.0011790724,0.0004692357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98657787,0.011480877,0.00037200504,0.00052465976,0.00065936643,0.0003852807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010134218,0.00046367152,0.00057258015,0.002683186,0.008630182,0.010504381,0.001486982,0.00893828,0.0030798377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009344402,0.00037856732,0.0005610928,0.0031904262,0.09963145,0.007854439,0.0041798335,0.008987633,0.00023586737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028079828,0.0000039042166,0.00004976571,0.000009630324,9.866238e-7,0.000013994463,0.004900258,0.000040891715,0.00001407053,0.99347985,0.0009021475,0.0005816631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010244236,0.0000052383048,0.00021158089,0.000101812264,0.0000027054896,0.000039676466,0.0066352463,0.00023340934,0.000072012175,0.9472931,0.045388483,0.0000066561415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009617115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011579098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010504381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009768232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055079157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0708738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086577566","doi":"10.7202/1018392ar","title":"Two Roads Diverged: A Comparative Analysis of Indigenous Rights in a North American Constitutional Context","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Indigenous; Parliament; Context (archaeology); Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Indian country; Constitutional law; Political economy; Public administration; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.0370546408088331,"score_gpt":0.32390931528107086,"score_spread":0.2868546744722378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086577566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.715053,0.0017868908,0.00019669555,0.0027622788,0.00003300887,0.000022780345,0.00003392773,0.000005520967,0.2801059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99489826,0.00052718894,0.00008752265,0.0002027139,0.00000988033,0.000013914032,0.000015110598,0.000005650269,0.0042398917],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960336,0.0015677578,0.00007155806,0.0002681505,0.00071230636,0.0013465662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958449,0.0023767466,0.00036559202,0.00019181977,0.0007878084,0.00043310112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029134788,0.00014682557,0.00038279826,0.0038178838,0.021788528,0.0069395322,0.0013184776,0.0012515957,0.007443108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006450168,0.00021915665,0.0002740102,0.0056359386,0.016709898,0.005751752,0.0052123633,0.0022978014,0.00019675944],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006360496,0.00009056759,0.016291913,0.00014728805,0.000027119871,0.00093709875,0.6292681,0.00016504685,0.00036826808,0.32931024,0.00216848,0.021162253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006268339,0.000032304408,0.06010248,0.0002204429,0.000037423233,0.00015260927,0.8749201,0.00014135346,0.00013481316,0.010777423,0.053452257,0.00002265757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39280197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7291962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.607198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020619415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011954545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78103125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087519073","doi":"10.1017/cls.2014.2","title":"La recherche de l’inclusion scolaire à travers les recours offerts aux familles : perspective comparative canadienne dans un contexte francophone minoritaire","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Francophone University Association; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; French; Political science; Sociology; Ethnology; Art","score_opus":0.065643415565174,"score_gpt":0.3204312423965508,"score_spread":0.2547878268313768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087519073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66371214,0.011484063,0.0013475489,0.041698348,0.00030929726,0.00009256972,0.00034400055,0.000016972248,0.28099507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97593427,0.0030282848,0.00027355953,0.0008009293,0.000027635804,0.00003826722,0.000045446865,0.000005978702,0.019845588],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668735,0.0011752774,0.00007032045,0.00029559265,0.00055487227,0.0012165497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994709,0.001851973,0.0005627455,0.00023437056,0.001586726,0.0010551751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039370526,0.00037030803,0.0004355083,0.0020848836,0.021256935,0.007865826,0.001213325,0.0016815932,0.008708737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004313238,0.00029366527,0.00031817908,0.003929214,0.01762539,0.0027157448,0.0040587783,0.0015869681,0.00036438592],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050094175,0.000035922993,0.019056983,0.0002922284,0.000014952697,0.0011660575,0.80766034,0.00013632236,0.00049493305,0.1482182,0.004921448,0.017952567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007341966,0.00003022103,0.02819623,0.0004808239,0.00002208356,0.00018930776,0.8490156,0.000052422183,0.00015696094,0.003623974,0.11819762,0.000027365848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9516068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9771004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9161736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08382641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.101191685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60820603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087543695","doi":"10.1080/09539960500165234","title":"Challenging statutory limitations on children's education rights: a re-examination of the Canadian Supreme Court Decision in<i>Auton</i>","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education and the Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Statutory law; Law; Political science; Democracy; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Fundamental rights; Mental health; Public administration; Sociology; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.022869122643670785,"score_gpt":0.2944852770101881,"score_spread":0.2716161543665173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087543695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071133,0.012167375,0.004549475,0.34724283,0.0016918743,0.0001881627,0.00076133513,0.00011142574,0.56215453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7488993,0.005786492,0.0037752215,0.15886241,0.001045567,0.00017328406,0.00024355584,0.00012815653,0.08108603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97227526,0.0032182073,0.0008413356,0.0025314959,0.011584932,0.009548787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98342437,0.008695158,0.00047593514,0.00064623554,0.0054231924,0.0013351004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01627002,0.00072945503,0.0012477908,0.0025417495,0.028918607,0.020780666,0.0063513503,0.017500281,0.0043208706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022747248,0.0008752384,0.0016402799,0.00293847,0.033528015,0.0054825107,0.005490855,0.027691042,0.0004269056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010732159,0.000011861531,0.00059193885,0.000030997307,0.000010808495,0.00032321445,0.007062744,0.00025458902,0.00014310896,0.9646012,0.023273993,0.0036847587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013335998,0.000045334258,0.011860548,0.0015153568,0.00020914404,0.0003641837,0.029071927,0.002731289,0.0014008653,0.28954715,0.6626778,0.00044301985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9847556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9878925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13675594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13675594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18041228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99223846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088265647","doi":"10.1163/1571811053890416","title":"The Equality and Liberty Rights of the Destitute: A Canadian Charter Case Example","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal on Minority and Group Rights","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03181811384957506,"score_gpt":0.30469633270134133,"score_spread":0.2728782188517663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088265647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17479248,0.0027557472,0.0029280037,0.05247847,0.00043216234,0.00038178076,0.0003182963,0.000041751155,0.76587135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8233411,0.0027249162,0.0033428206,0.008593354,0.00008614397,0.0002456734,0.0000744028,0.000052282747,0.16153938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919665,0.0013428044,0.00011973936,0.0006101977,0.0019780968,0.003982624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996714,0.0013805279,0.00014310116,0.00014757231,0.00095712405,0.0006578054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044245785,0.00096562016,0.000987976,0.00265282,0.055459984,0.011167617,0.0031008285,0.013865481,0.0083522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008153357,0.0007652292,0.0010473841,0.003965461,0.018672708,0.0032924146,0.004951913,0.010410003,0.00040671072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037468355,0.000055239874,0.0014328571,0.000037927595,0.000010151406,0.0018824459,0.019734794,0.0005592854,0.00020021683,0.94670147,0.022813326,0.006534946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031005323,0.0001082271,0.012225332,0.0006760447,0.00021481613,0.0021004947,0.10121204,0.003963717,0.001264417,0.11766936,0.7597335,0.0005220525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9911816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10620679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10620679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14577664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7705878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089225735","doi":"10.7202/1027576ar","title":"Test d’ADN et filiation à la lumière des développements récents : dilemmes et paradoxes","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.028952610658015215,"score_gpt":0.30501720536558974,"score_spread":0.2760645947075745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089225735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44544533,0.009674999,0.0057758368,0.20030424,0.0008334792,0.00014997605,0.0008951829,0.00012485603,0.33679608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96903706,0.001524813,0.00073516695,0.00459913,0.00017151504,0.00008431962,0.00009232393,0.00003836321,0.023717249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879511,0.0057569183,0.00041337914,0.00092545047,0.003242553,0.001710591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9103843,0.06048918,0.007972738,0.003382968,0.0131555395,0.004615202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018308388,0.00034777226,0.0005547878,0.0029869725,0.0053818002,0.009000213,0.0023873092,0.002874225,0.016884128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07634482,0.0002049891,0.00046676016,0.0039130165,0.008541032,0.006579189,0.004889434,0.0037824793,0.0013797429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030109775,0.00032349536,0.05510945,0.00038276726,0.00007514619,0.00067288097,0.055432104,0.0010040939,0.00025600864,0.7279296,0.029890625,0.12862282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021567919,0.00055185205,0.16663954,0.0015178705,0.00016301185,0.00043017216,0.10391474,0.002991208,0.002855034,0.2100173,0.5105098,0.00019382167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08163163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06693904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08163163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020614706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016038852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16231298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091205608","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905220103","title":"Shifting Boundaries: Aboriginal Identity, Pluralist Theory and the Politics of Self-Government","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Politics; Government (linguistics); Identity politics; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Political economy; Aesthetics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012664613682177632,"score_gpt":0.3177184029392749,"score_spread":0.30505378925709725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091205608","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061089687,0.069039576,0.008915936,0.25519624,0.00089112134,0.000047243106,0.00008220437,0.000044887536,0.6046931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9372818,0.013269035,0.002260636,0.006864608,0.00027745296,0.00004225876,0.000034801677,0.000045116158,0.039924283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730897,0.0011760728,0.000042094172,0.00016613913,0.000620924,0.0006857498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872714,0.0006117649,0.00010915961,0.00008383826,0.00020431408,0.00026371836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003186242,0.00041192444,0.000465049,0.0013370438,0.017067606,0.013081955,0.0018302256,0.0040648817,0.0035753164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031686754,0.00024368617,0.0003207383,0.0030875572,0.06450652,0.007038412,0.0052232444,0.0039014178,0.00034445137],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005709116,0.000006810487,0.00022276498,0.000029895265,0.0000018624021,0.00006260179,0.043484397,0.0001277615,0.000026078398,0.94558275,0.006737719,0.0037117724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009883557,0.000006560853,0.001431366,0.00028043272,0.0000070104297,0.000080294885,0.07373328,0.0003659111,0.00009763172,0.75621235,0.16776034,0.0000149190155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6935368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75751996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30646318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041539036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046239927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.616536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091857827","doi":"10.7202/1000618ar","title":"Was Duplessis Right?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Royal Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Law; Politics; Appeal; State (computer science); Pluralism (philosophy); Surprise; Sociology; Persecution; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06726963279502593,"score_gpt":0.3042984447804934,"score_spread":0.23702881198546746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091857827","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10262527,0.013943572,0.001796168,0.45907262,0.0027228866,0.000035546578,0.00016138231,0.00004452497,0.419598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83410186,0.002604945,0.0004029402,0.0673786,0.00055429805,0.000022824783,0.00004359979,0.000026097865,0.09486486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982577,0.00041659805,0.000043410222,0.00046354867,0.00031452347,0.000504225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924195,0.00028073162,0.00007586071,0.0000575333,0.00021312562,0.00013085624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002236314,0.00023089255,0.0003196016,0.00037826775,0.012582988,0.0057165027,0.0008579902,0.0051106564,0.0046276664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047134613,0.00015572022,0.00021184981,0.00037254996,0.01475765,0.003404225,0.001807522,0.005014615,0.000740119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038306112,0.000011711015,0.0017941261,0.00003324939,0.0000067909236,0.00081053836,0.025027258,0.000023595794,0.00022608312,0.9030008,0.052389916,0.016637536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001653879,0.000034302066,0.0030449477,0.00023081504,0.00002079611,0.0009231044,0.026864242,0.00011936946,0.0008386577,0.08931228,0.87855184,0.000043127253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18809688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24567543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8119031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012206499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007055512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37400407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092317233","doi":"10.7202/1005136ar","title":"An Exemption for Sincere Believers: The Challenge of Alberta v. Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Sincerity; Context (archaeology); Test (biology); Charter; Government (linguistics); Political science; Balancing test; Sociology; Law and economics; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07338476443723861,"score_gpt":0.3212583960577365,"score_spread":0.24787363162049786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092317233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15307686,0.003965048,0.00262167,0.23225544,0.00096483895,0.00013626173,0.00014414139,0.00010411991,0.60673165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80249673,0.0011877761,0.0022279,0.08147149,0.000245412,0.000061333514,0.00007234792,0.000037747872,0.112199314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992226,0.0009099165,0.00013525023,0.00057765626,0.0041081714,0.0020430738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99455595,0.001875536,0.00019604791,0.00032926007,0.0017582179,0.0012849431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038334993,0.0002793012,0.00035404647,0.0006881282,0.014607418,0.0066003343,0.0033533578,0.007955395,0.0028331762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010673346,0.00048468783,0.00039032113,0.000579583,0.010121651,0.0015771938,0.0025626363,0.009962262,0.00033495744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048116326,0.00005569473,0.0059932843,0.000048113205,0.000018412402,0.0011554528,0.010578453,0.00041986382,0.0010715368,0.8649302,0.08947159,0.026209252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016844473,0.00014596972,0.03167505,0.0006157579,0.00014438268,0.00078134914,0.020830601,0.0022041118,0.0027254433,0.1398331,0.8006,0.00027582367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9149801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9720824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9149801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025332566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07525554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18380153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092488963","doi":"10.1017/s0008423906299967","title":"Calling Power to Account: Law, Reparations, and the Chinese Head Tax Case","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Supreme court; Power (physics); Political science; Head (geology); Common law; Sociology","score_opus":0.018335500511273705,"score_gpt":0.3364242935583813,"score_spread":0.31808879304710763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092488963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29641598,0.02413602,0.0012201425,0.11473741,0.0006230728,0.00014333209,0.00010329526,0.00002993373,0.5625909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9126595,0.0066873995,0.00026215558,0.008924679,0.00031418045,0.00008428862,0.000031552278,0.000010626326,0.071025506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763143,0.00043654538,0.00005637563,0.00015714832,0.0006793331,0.0010392264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887115,0.00051975664,0.00015324181,0.00007121038,0.00020413456,0.00018052751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023476118,0.00037544937,0.00027696,0.0013864475,0.013357757,0.006751059,0.001799442,0.004803594,0.0031248338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034077063,0.0003243094,0.0003416722,0.0029462257,0.022160126,0.0030520484,0.0035190852,0.003980695,0.00022443905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002222824,0.000018954292,0.0027617721,0.000048951286,0.000008004028,0.0012747599,0.038630247,0.00024185627,0.00015134474,0.90442616,0.04204091,0.01037478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082679166,0.00005891517,0.042600233,0.00063925993,0.00010799636,0.0008467897,0.10150551,0.002143455,0.0015232217,0.24165611,0.6086261,0.00020976551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4971952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48686665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50280476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032106664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031397637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98860246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093014733","doi":"10.7202/1027131ar","title":"L’impact de la règle religieuse sur la disparition du lien conjugal en droit civil français et québécois","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Ethnology; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.00889556373042252,"score_gpt":0.26598045592137953,"score_spread":0.25708489219095704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093014733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819547,0.0006580816,0.00007518223,0.0022476746,0.000016323198,0.000010105192,0.00016538062,0.000002435653,0.014870276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952434,0.00030565966,0.00003932959,0.00019292004,0.00000431321,0.00000608169,0.00007012354,0.0000031783727,0.0041350937],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981183,0.00062949944,0.00003960143,0.00013511133,0.00044291667,0.00063470117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99414825,0.00121053,0.0010200308,0.00028050554,0.0017839688,0.0015567606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021662381,0.0002298194,0.00038121123,0.0014995785,0.0057124007,0.0030714995,0.000755348,0.00051162817,0.008647423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004905238,0.0001850891,0.0003151883,0.0016516118,0.0040229233,0.00083677296,0.0022518954,0.0013119964,0.00031604586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018111175,0.00014594907,0.79419744,0.00009122717,0.00017650679,0.00067830505,0.13609444,0.0003490368,0.0007022506,0.017238453,0.0056419806,0.044503223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008262952,0.00004009278,0.8928885,0.00015365658,0.00003100672,0.000088991976,0.08853743,0.00013096925,0.00018640864,0.00055318535,0.017352134,0.000029364242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95558524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98015714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04441476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026225142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019554496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19027764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094864765","doi":"10.7202/042901ar","title":"L'objet des droits constitutionnels à l'égalité","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Social equality; Dignity; Charter; Human rights; Political science; Gender equality; Context (archaeology); Law; Sociology; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Racial equality; Gender studies; Racism","score_opus":0.018152580466572595,"score_gpt":0.2810107019854449,"score_spread":0.26285812151887233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094864765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014110648,0.018702874,0.008363799,0.040116765,0.0018984776,0.000087359695,0.0005247611,0.00026727526,0.915928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45063707,0.01704327,0.012256301,0.015548634,0.0014342247,0.00026480464,0.00041811602,0.0003250923,0.50207245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923819,0.0012978677,0.00015120298,0.00048425002,0.004445778,0.0012390702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996935,0.0010155714,0.00014452734,0.0003328562,0.001233807,0.0003382427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042233677,0.00075207104,0.00062133896,0.0017608913,0.0077999304,0.012290965,0.001382068,0.0030748714,0.013917429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008318508,0.00037777098,0.0006252281,0.0018872736,0.012443205,0.0032853244,0.0027267819,0.006631792,0.0017413624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010076539,0.000009603818,0.0002829672,0.000040335224,0.000005307507,0.00005617027,0.002235254,0.00020292359,0.00021318458,0.96218216,0.016354552,0.0184074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011198117,0.000007475635,0.0015836142,0.00015300457,0.000006248426,0.000061692044,0.0015832237,0.00015414182,0.0002837994,0.025843058,0.97028583,0.000026704061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83431363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040108453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04782788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2910086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095307881","doi":"10.1007/s10691-014-9263-3","title":"Sexual Assault and the Meaning of Power and Authority for Women with Mental Disabilities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Doctrine; Criminology; Psychology; Sexual violence; Power (physics); Meaning (existential); Economic Justice; Public international law; Criminal law; Law; Social psychology; International law; Political science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.031581546580396004,"score_gpt":0.32370811175730513,"score_spread":0.2921265651769091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095307881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73512197,0.0059952224,0.00038903524,0.05367328,0.0002943175,0.000023106895,0.000052022064,0.0000053769813,0.20444562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996527,0.0009118484,0.000028222998,0.0006947073,0.000036168098,0.0000074510913,0.000004184597,0.0000022633576,0.0017881026],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961009,0.0024538895,0.00009207928,0.00012247353,0.0003054907,0.00092517596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942542,0.00391589,0.00071866874,0.00017616389,0.00029516898,0.00063997984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034342357,0.00027061923,0.00033790193,0.0021068167,0.015062352,0.009006501,0.0011657637,0.0028047026,0.005131912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0118755875,0.0002595118,0.0002633769,0.0014071488,0.047533464,0.006560168,0.006947775,0.0049163997,0.00017685741],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004491276,0.000087692046,0.006723782,0.0000634982,0.000007207908,0.0009198949,0.7193561,0.0000582705,0.00016377299,0.26114705,0.0015009705,0.0099268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000096973135,0.00002582234,0.0058372603,0.00023136259,0.000007936122,0.00048356832,0.94553715,0.000040951843,0.00010850533,0.030980688,0.016723363,0.000013731181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036952242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050462577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036952242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067219194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064649386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07347435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095388448","doi":"10.1163/187633712x631246","title":"Enforcement of Divorce Judgments in Jewish Courts in Israel: The Interaction Between Religious and Constitutional Law*","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Middle East Law and Governance","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Wife; Supreme court; Spouse; Jurisdiction; Adjudication; Judaism; Sanctions; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.043390873074170354,"score_gpt":0.28735224388677394,"score_spread":0.24396137081260358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095388448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73403996,0.0023544997,0.02853215,0.02635655,0.00024230142,0.0005120689,0.00009985578,0.00022628526,0.20763627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98816574,0.00034221567,0.004901756,0.0028424503,0.0001225577,0.00007947769,0.000024275692,0.000014921871,0.0035067305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9738404,0.01216325,0.0016498858,0.0012617528,0.0066113323,0.004473321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8947352,0.072132036,0.010258163,0.003988694,0.015484749,0.0034010177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052861236,0.0002028138,0.0005016766,0.0018189057,0.0094792275,0.009643006,0.0033839361,0.0054539335,0.0031752128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09514409,0.0010351819,0.0004928201,0.0012814605,0.0080726035,0.0034361833,0.0038485005,0.0054382277,0.00046717125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003440193,0.0013307591,0.08108608,0.00030097435,0.0002141435,0.0036463514,0.041690204,0.0060908003,0.008142144,0.71376854,0.015337298,0.12804875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014642525,0.0011584235,0.19867797,0.0020707278,0.00051732216,0.0017925595,0.047139987,0.08267743,0.016614415,0.46849138,0.17851275,0.00088282395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06478959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.119708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06478959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009643793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015959961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27956027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096129482","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2280","title":"New Dialectical Rules For Ambiguity","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Argument (complex analysis); Grice; Argumentative; Epistemology; Conversation; Dialectic; Context (archaeology); Argumentation theory; Set (abstract data type); Linguistics; Computer science; Pragmatics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05556845093921646,"score_gpt":0.34174667509680223,"score_spread":0.28617822415758576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096129482","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023680755,0.0011639491,0.9081187,0.005687282,0.0007797613,0.00068210164,0.0002104985,0.0005219864,0.08046759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12781829,0.001102246,0.8505359,0.0014785313,0.0006557599,0.0025438785,0.00034618576,0.00051395915,0.015005241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9384263,0.03263204,0.008098513,0.006758128,0.012545871,0.0015390929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93234324,0.043667153,0.0029234737,0.009937289,0.00997118,0.0011577652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043137953,0.0020763187,0.0025886158,0.0076572895,0.0076649245,0.020305928,0.006303157,0.0070361034,0.009058602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084369175,0.0023694332,0.003830012,0.00440033,0.030370444,0.036667798,0.011741591,0.014164187,0.004193633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050995914,0.0000052247233,0.00004990011,0.000034839115,0.000007684557,0.000032515305,0.0015322458,0.0002688557,0.000053655578,0.9924988,0.0010080936,0.00450307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014917015,0.0000037845434,0.00002264781,0.00006849647,0.000009637608,0.00007056619,0.00029081682,0.0017058399,0.0001898232,0.97735834,0.02024624,0.00001885522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002236012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023798586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043137953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073095844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057383133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22813803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097967677","doi":"10.7202/015782ar","title":"Droits des enfants, droits des parents","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Enfances Familles Générations","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Ethnology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03600898672045326,"score_gpt":0.3430070830882461,"score_spread":0.30699809636779285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097967677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3192766,0.113010235,0.0048248074,0.016637806,0.0026443892,0.00008294023,0.002081943,0.00014133521,0.5412999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7604827,0.07705889,0.0028415371,0.0023933856,0.00074501184,0.000108340966,0.0014401253,0.000080273036,0.15484972],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913496,0.00035749096,0.000045151843,0.00013840426,0.00020175724,0.00012223642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885774,0.0004369032,0.00018196178,0.000072694835,0.00031177956,0.00013896624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089588447,0.00032076123,0.00027660586,0.0010571702,0.0029429526,0.0015969329,0.0003835257,0.00066947873,0.021627907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003644028,0.00015529509,0.00020581187,0.0012944278,0.0011915467,0.0020324828,0.0011720959,0.0010507661,0.0022830477],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021861008,0.00010465495,0.06988508,0.0015226247,0.00006999169,0.0056605428,0.20746377,0.0003003983,0.0014014307,0.18098654,0.07155588,0.46083048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006402025,0.00006234325,0.058411933,0.0011859521,0.000025850799,0.003041986,0.050652042,0.00007804657,0.00035491996,0.004180954,0.88196564,0.000033896406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04996026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060930494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04996026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014391231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019930226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09933889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098085400","doi":"","title":"Governor General Announces New Appointments to the Order of Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Governor; Order (exchange); Political science; Work (physics); Law; Executive order; Public administration; Business; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.024356282320318196,"score_gpt":0.29763821811582375,"score_spread":0.2732819357955055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098085400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035995726,0.003222219,0.0012581733,0.3312346,0.04061693,0.0014126785,0.0065340535,0.0013557866,0.57836974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01987304,0.0004999648,0.00037349053,0.020160975,0.0007921134,0.000063153064,0.00048485777,0.00011852417,0.95763385],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943508,0.00015503027,0.00012988184,0.00043788474,0.0025591366,0.0023671747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905996,0.00055211375,0.0001344131,0.00021959054,0.0053187003,0.0031756503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002375523,0.00058843684,0.0012718303,0.0015499729,0.021129047,0.008079609,0.0024911002,0.012684331,0.09269232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066261184,0.00095208874,0.0011650576,0.0013677041,0.0021825037,0.0013211274,0.0016681437,0.010818015,0.013175645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009441019,0.00006647738,0.0029805675,0.000046170357,0.000017253982,0.00045576328,0.00031834736,0.00014577743,0.00045371376,0.008032382,0.9798906,0.0074985856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003229267,0.000031192754,0.0064351014,0.000038964215,0.000014760685,0.00004185456,0.0010465008,0.00026784657,0.00026696728,0.00037888988,0.9913965,0.000049124592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9673824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99064976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09269232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047544397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13679793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3449604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100052892","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905040539","title":"Up the Creek: Fishing for a New Constitutional Order","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Joke; Politics; Order (exchange); Indigenous; Political science; Law; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Literature; Business","score_opus":0.0572730117395688,"score_gpt":0.34753217224735933,"score_spread":0.29025916050779055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100052892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054379575,0.0032756587,0.016809488,0.10958572,0.0005900441,0.00013625558,0.00035640434,0.00014033992,0.8147266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9099407,0.0013350009,0.006244201,0.0106522115,0.00022528117,0.00009509857,0.0001796386,0.00008965391,0.071238145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98840106,0.002248522,0.0003268921,0.0018363394,0.0043818275,0.0028053874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903409,0.0031782428,0.0003774606,0.0011296006,0.003879843,0.0010939719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010342062,0.00033669703,0.00061007665,0.001937871,0.030097788,0.022037916,0.002447167,0.005442833,0.010894632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013887972,0.00040939826,0.0005099961,0.0034966662,0.055213485,0.009421926,0.005872572,0.009857868,0.000591429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023850207,0.0000022785346,0.00016290385,0.0000063108855,9.983062e-7,0.000022938239,0.0036399825,0.000056519428,0.00003096203,0.99167657,0.0026737177,0.001724435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024936333,0.000018401406,0.0024723315,0.00022777607,0.000026198732,0.000069778915,0.018005885,0.00077330536,0.00029149427,0.50569266,0.47231582,0.00008142817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.890674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9159666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109326005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09683737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1365024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70260763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100107939","doi":"10.1163/ej.9789004172326.i-395","title":"Religious Confession Privilege and the Common Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confession (law); Privilege (computing); Statute; Common law; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03346952398377098,"score_gpt":0.2995574239870164,"score_spread":0.26608790000324545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100107939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016597051,0.03614299,0.0026866756,0.050934166,0.0007913047,0.000026860274,0.000053269436,0.00002635874,0.8927413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76417345,0.022364093,0.0016090729,0.011404396,0.0014229286,0.00008994661,0.00009447338,0.000049778366,0.1987919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789137,0.0009004785,0.00006820645,0.00017507556,0.00066911435,0.0002957692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962568,0.0027790784,0.00021817055,0.00028268583,0.00028211164,0.00018120019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019276582,0.00017819942,0.0003370076,0.0011579401,0.0038128018,0.008115418,0.00076419185,0.0030002196,0.0055987155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058052693,0.00022951022,0.00024645153,0.0014160082,0.030055419,0.008767635,0.0033367388,0.005486443,0.00085368403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017051542,0.0000046138675,0.00008551018,0.000015691452,6.920336e-7,0.000040102896,0.0028493681,0.000018123641,0.000018353898,0.9861011,0.005954543,0.0049103717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054089187,0.000016657734,0.0013096563,0.0006457923,0.000004994271,0.0002276583,0.0070184907,0.00013414468,0.00010340374,0.6347313,0.35578927,0.00001323473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009548344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012112014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009548344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004884699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004260354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03544116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103288000","doi":"10.21971/p77c7x","title":"Public Attitudes in Canada Toward Unmarried Mothers, 1950-1996","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Crossing boundaries","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shame; Stigma (botany); Social stigma; Psychology; Social psychology; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Psychiatry; Family medicine","score_opus":0.08800606726244363,"score_gpt":0.3115716632683954,"score_spread":0.22356559600595177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103288000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789636,0.0026375584,0.000042703185,0.0053703887,0.0000781823,0.00003033983,0.0012533695,0.0000131474935,0.011610594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98316664,0.0026319257,0.00006614518,0.0008046959,0.000027408689,0.000016540995,0.0003528283,0.0000074254885,0.012926326],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887496,0.00009179294,0.00002714274,0.000062611616,0.0005329357,0.0004105311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956137,0.0004597431,0.00070547103,0.00005797689,0.0021523843,0.001010729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012023819,0.00021888684,0.0002443311,0.0014671806,0.006269653,0.0024244287,0.00080454187,0.0006641665,0.0026458271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047393753,0.00028510718,0.0002159066,0.0029328552,0.0020256098,0.0007454416,0.001014818,0.0012860629,0.00028183463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004977562,0.00029174457,0.68236977,0.0003308798,0.000057802707,0.0010401948,0.214098,0.00020536645,0.00079580856,0.004019199,0.02492209,0.071371414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018038778,0.000078219804,0.8700823,0.00016259305,0.0000258611,0.00012430362,0.084770836,0.0001448131,0.0003363725,0.00009699241,0.04412307,0.0000365919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08177416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08177416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04663393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59331584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104120530","doi":"10.7202/1008873ar","title":"La question du « choix » dans la décision de se marier ou non au Québec","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Lien social et Politiques","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.034528447241686126,"score_gpt":0.37248136253242964,"score_spread":0.3379529152907435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104120530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43568385,0.0036900789,0.004214695,0.1576789,0.0008489096,0.00013513397,0.00017030742,0.000044112097,0.39753407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9105125,0.0007211767,0.0006117168,0.00695265,0.00004709965,0.000033687385,0.000025902398,0.000018573981,0.08107677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951432,0.0014490386,0.00010044422,0.00056256365,0.0010883944,0.0016563808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960663,0.00087560405,0.0002358373,0.00015825772,0.0013641415,0.0013000142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045292596,0.0001894851,0.00031637025,0.0006258949,0.021171289,0.006645691,0.0015261787,0.0029379518,0.012028547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007425013,0.00033300056,0.00027590577,0.0008503498,0.012854056,0.0022853806,0.0030991016,0.0049105478,0.0006141701],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009254237,0.00007650937,0.02324075,0.00013619332,0.000057380254,0.0010477907,0.120695874,0.000572734,0.0015210926,0.765959,0.03577946,0.05082067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053586577,0.00011909445,0.051492546,0.0008384201,0.00008155221,0.0002999148,0.28142604,0.00091291516,0.0014117772,0.030544734,0.6326315,0.00018800193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94096744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9743148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05903256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040333044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08552297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29263812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104738641","doi":"10.1525/aa.2001.103.2.565","title":"The Pleasure of the Crown: Anthropology, Law and First Nations; Incorporating the Familiar: An Investigation into Legal Sensibilities in Nunavik","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Anthropologist","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Crown (dentistry); Law; Queen (butterfly); Sociology; Anthropology; History; Political science; Psychology; Ecology; Medicine","score_opus":0.026883150902088995,"score_gpt":0.3316637072623046,"score_spread":0.3047805563602156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104738641","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030641064,0.7683819,0.0007301631,0.044400614,0.001977122,0.00008642222,0.0001501818,0.000030311428,0.15360227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5646945,0.33158776,0.0017749243,0.0059611723,0.0007863529,0.00017009463,0.00014518444,0.00008257133,0.09479751],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985061,0.0007988462,0.00003985145,0.000093248585,0.00031592854,0.00024599428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985977,0.0007647865,0.000113115995,0.00006338833,0.00020894455,0.00025210975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020910725,0.001240643,0.0006218585,0.0028373003,0.011975048,0.009805292,0.0018595329,0.0027682998,0.00806666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028567135,0.00077539985,0.00029498918,0.007880911,0.019979825,0.01069623,0.0041510463,0.002901539,0.00071632076],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044063203,0.000103967344,0.004586067,0.00076998683,0.000016965989,0.00066207204,0.55650574,0.00018607684,0.0003608976,0.15353289,0.17088453,0.11234674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074807813,0.000021089882,0.013631152,0.0022156562,0.000014888197,0.00027923932,0.4498197,0.00007939331,0.00013079934,0.030646285,0.503115,0.000039358947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4899267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7437678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5100733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016949695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018530378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104824880","doi":"","title":"A History of Preferential Share in Ontario: Intestacy Legislation and Conceptions of the Deserving or Undeserving Widow","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estate; Legislation; Wife; Settlor; Spouse; Law; Law reform; Political science; Annulment; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04985179999804352,"score_gpt":0.2835424754451565,"score_spread":0.23369067544711297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104824880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4083089,0.0057499306,0.003652829,0.03330627,0.0003581994,0.00008116601,0.00024705238,0.00003983536,0.54825586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9522409,0.0014611165,0.00042148627,0.0013355354,0.000029927058,0.000021651309,0.00002779794,0.000015778678,0.044445857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978064,0.00038217477,0.000054125907,0.00020520744,0.00055807235,0.0009940141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986947,0.0003613724,0.0001488567,0.000089949775,0.00035657687,0.00034854058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018539601,0.00021086515,0.00022621923,0.000845411,0.028213155,0.004814114,0.0011301371,0.0018524658,0.0036986754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031628956,0.00039638867,0.00022101248,0.0016224425,0.026238112,0.0024429138,0.0036824606,0.0025662307,0.00014618895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004756232,0.000016104901,0.008623754,0.00006781451,0.0000050651724,0.00075516605,0.28884014,0.00019323736,0.00066082407,0.6748839,0.010272334,0.015634077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015705093,0.00004261671,0.04169719,0.0003112856,0.00002101696,0.00030943516,0.17719184,0.0004158349,0.0007028771,0.023116432,0.7560838,0.00009206141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9801763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99417394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12089918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12089918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07373405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87718904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105618512","doi":"10.7202/038177ar","title":"The Constitution’s Peoples: Approaching Community in the Context of Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Treaty; Jurisprudence; Law; Declaration; Context (archaeology); Cornerstone; Political science; Doctrine; Section (typography); Negotiation; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.04724023654900858,"score_gpt":0.3060059065138428,"score_spread":0.2587656699648342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105618512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0601565,0.018548664,0.005082765,0.20443949,0.0011748448,0.00012986854,0.00013898633,0.000031363394,0.7102975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91361564,0.005545667,0.0030152202,0.017726146,0.0005159757,0.0002784448,0.00011587287,0.000047670554,0.05913923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99081504,0.0054482324,0.00015112979,0.00042882323,0.0014178941,0.0017388472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967843,0.0021407874,0.00015902518,0.00008853263,0.00034942947,0.00047785582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058870073,0.00045186162,0.0004700058,0.0025745365,0.03469824,0.016386162,0.0020922031,0.010105496,0.0028009296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009645625,0.0005516694,0.00037313075,0.0037506926,0.052995775,0.009921386,0.008697729,0.009627644,0.00021907872],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000329281,0.000008319841,0.0003022471,0.000012217065,0.0000011781411,0.00023519798,0.06336006,0.00008194679,0.00003362214,0.9251405,0.008354794,0.0024666209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001879717,0.000018801364,0.0028328365,0.00036429169,0.000009479324,0.00014998956,0.17938952,0.00040761285,0.000079358215,0.42124414,0.3954538,0.000031391468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47492835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6452751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5250716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053006005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051762916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9443279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105643594","doi":"10.7202/042191ar","title":"La « civilizatio » du droit canonique: une problématique du droit québécois","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Appeal; Conscience; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Civil code; Opposition (politics); State (computer science); Phenomenon; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.007816597737783879,"score_gpt":0.24546495488664077,"score_spread":0.2376483571488569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105643594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09166936,0.10237596,0.006742122,0.35565197,0.0029859666,0.00006279633,0.0005197702,0.00013219444,0.43985993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.843524,0.029730689,0.0029084869,0.0151261175,0.0012092529,0.00004580005,0.0001940361,0.000098914345,0.10716269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668556,0.0009796171,0.000077378616,0.0003903288,0.0010416647,0.00082548766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968118,0.0013659152,0.00017616202,0.00015621414,0.001187009,0.00030298677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025675576,0.0006857595,0.00063695107,0.0021353015,0.013896987,0.011778471,0.0022102136,0.007701584,0.007698652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005486789,0.000591292,0.0006719505,0.0030692664,0.016882213,0.0041618627,0.00222714,0.009148742,0.0006545379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027070888,0.000033932523,0.0030593243,0.00014776124,0.000037779304,0.0012664539,0.010935001,0.0017710079,0.00025324657,0.8537986,0.080225155,0.048444692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022360453,0.00001833947,0.013682471,0.0006103405,0.000036132864,0.0010717107,0.021556059,0.0039313454,0.0003769155,0.09222666,0.8663305,0.00013714613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9742552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96127725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074990086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.074990086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045889463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5440937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106265496","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x11000068","title":"Judicial Restraint and Neutral Principles in Anglican Church Property Disputes: <i>Bentley v Diocese of New Westminster</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Synod; Statutory law; Political science; Theology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08927004415386,"score_gpt":0.30501881551784576,"score_spread":0.21574877136398576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106265496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16354309,0.0069407285,0.009679047,0.11581011,0.0010742482,0.0003180236,0.0002173841,0.00013464683,0.7022826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9220409,0.00086368225,0.0022470427,0.03304174,0.00041160206,0.00023871232,0.00005799902,0.00005156277,0.041046705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859512,0.0048964904,0.00079620164,0.0020033466,0.0031531043,0.0031996768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882306,0.0068221786,0.0005989746,0.0011296105,0.002199308,0.0010194456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014859991,0.00037956383,0.0007581926,0.001225121,0.021786684,0.024177127,0.0051308046,0.019510023,0.0037599977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024564099,0.0011037152,0.00047020544,0.001442048,0.03927722,0.0048204027,0.0052971365,0.017442567,0.0009215043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021561773,0.000019922429,0.0005913472,0.000024234185,0.000008377986,0.00040400596,0.01184387,0.00008888359,0.00034559393,0.9738607,0.010185173,0.0026062978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002481436,0.00008021207,0.0051267357,0.000899517,0.000120811026,0.0007300819,0.043271087,0.0017654165,0.0024155823,0.5176403,0.42739373,0.00030839557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42339548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54280883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42339548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023736134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037259895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8418621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106498539","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2002.tb01071.x","title":"Recognizing same‐sex relationships: The evolution of recent federal and provincial policies","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Jurisdiction; Constitution; Humanities; Law; Art","score_opus":0.09844343157174186,"score_gpt":0.3018348072751161,"score_spread":0.20339137570337423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106498539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42981595,0.019334855,0.010237808,0.22895622,0.0013473943,0.0005043091,0.0015911903,0.00032805145,0.30788413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9331812,0.0041249613,0.0034939435,0.011902944,0.00020906799,0.00009831066,0.00039569617,0.000053529086,0.04654033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866182,0.0015522458,0.00050375995,0.001199974,0.0054884534,0.0046373084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799872,0.0038746968,0.0017502183,0.0009757471,0.009043489,0.004368602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012407099,0.00015375213,0.0003277961,0.00227916,0.011617702,0.0061829174,0.0030587546,0.0026153927,0.005345309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019519754,0.0005281792,0.00037584058,0.004031691,0.006433142,0.0013719825,0.0030936557,0.0046242015,0.0003464129],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001514271,0.00018843592,0.04947709,0.00057776103,0.00006947425,0.00033073075,0.031652957,0.0038882243,0.002495743,0.650715,0.047768485,0.21268465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059970956,0.000146057,0.16590486,0.00062480825,0.000075368414,0.00019718213,0.014008248,0.0029786893,0.0029817787,0.017530562,0.7953186,0.00017380995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9523437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9671806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12324415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12324415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18553595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89420307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107686027","doi":"","title":"Roman Catholic schooling in Ontario: Past struggles, present challenges, future direction?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Faith; Diversity (politics); Colonialism; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; History; Law; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.06547199566284374,"score_gpt":0.28968578201175654,"score_spread":0.2242137863489128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107686027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61234766,0.012002703,0.00038281232,0.2637798,0.0005347833,0.00011166923,0.0006701854,0.00004211988,0.11012828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9444408,0.008342052,0.00073799206,0.009373358,0.00008744449,0.000052798954,0.0002223415,0.000028511491,0.03671464],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971976,0.00045987812,0.00005626042,0.00013909218,0.00042267266,0.0017245003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936786,0.0003462105,0.00048784094,0.00014390449,0.0012412496,0.0041022184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002030473,0.00018128929,0.00034843897,0.0007748164,0.0138667645,0.0031469306,0.0012541846,0.0013065776,0.009512236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037366322,0.00028378487,0.00018445168,0.0024214506,0.0069120326,0.0014031295,0.0038225166,0.0019824884,0.00044649065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024413965,0.0002880042,0.22856478,0.0010687681,0.0000623406,0.0030333686,0.25690085,0.00038034248,0.001242348,0.12673487,0.16493039,0.21654975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041877323,0.000058525704,0.30081668,0.00085612596,0.000027229651,0.00035446254,0.2766134,0.00022474525,0.00022494198,0.003720786,0.41699195,0.00006914822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9850699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99653375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90922624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.090773754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1749341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6586127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108565497","doi":"","title":"Constitutional jurisdiction over health in Canada.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Public administration; Health care; Criminal jurisdiction; Political science; Health law; Federal jurisdiction; Government (linguistics); Law; Health policy; Parliament; Public health; Business; International health; Medicine; Politics; Nursing","score_opus":0.024821388640788977,"score_gpt":0.2699187314856157,"score_spread":0.2450973428448267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108565497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022779241,0.011415539,0.0018492742,0.030256746,0.00056874723,0.00009014821,0.0013096584,0.000072463976,0.93165827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8052711,0.011664313,0.00296187,0.017655147,0.00025591164,0.000109835324,0.0008333628,0.00006588885,0.16118257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933891,0.00053590257,0.00016025537,0.00052507385,0.0030113563,0.0023783222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99515355,0.001190854,0.00018967646,0.00019298782,0.0023061007,0.00096689066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030898107,0.0003433977,0.00037937806,0.002678949,0.021565763,0.009772495,0.0015077916,0.0021318458,0.012941251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074426467,0.00037269187,0.00040271072,0.004895897,0.014361072,0.0019479314,0.0032423786,0.0033711581,0.00063274056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006055535,0.000006237399,0.0009912893,0.000032506876,0.0000039895176,0.00008512405,0.003828729,0.00014850372,0.00006365266,0.9638648,0.020894088,0.010074993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001973865,0.000010433129,0.01275928,0.0003273445,0.000026883528,0.00012422996,0.005880822,0.0004224876,0.00017882667,0.07237822,0.90780574,0.000065944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99414825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14485957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14485957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.278642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108607654","doi":"","title":"Collaborative Divorce: hoe een teambenadering in conflictoplossingsprocessen tot een succes maken?","year":2012,"lang":"nl","type":"article","venue":"Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Art; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016171178326272653,"score_gpt":0.2552923874324379,"score_spread":0.23912120910616522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108607654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8861953,0.006768717,0.009630591,0.024692943,0.0003511668,0.00021513,0.00020519744,0.00005751078,0.071883455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900615,0.0017436151,0.0015473944,0.00075818,0.000040156745,0.00012087733,0.000078324476,0.000032540924,0.005617489],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98696136,0.0074177985,0.00048217722,0.0011030484,0.0025584095,0.0014772001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786365,0.008689255,0.003749116,0.0011494203,0.002512119,0.005263622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012121728,0.00047562167,0.0006709283,0.0017171499,0.009590999,0.008065131,0.0019581674,0.0014733388,0.010944046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040944036,0.00057849573,0.00046055496,0.0020227423,0.009384953,0.0075610224,0.011528329,0.003106367,0.0008876937],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012813123,0.00031318952,0.08791309,0.00030094146,0.00010375353,0.001584185,0.7368829,0.00024939622,0.0003363202,0.08817828,0.005367651,0.07864217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006172829,0.00010911876,0.07326297,0.00060753117,0.00006258985,0.0010320103,0.8238038,0.000539997,0.00045384755,0.046390317,0.05358851,0.00008757844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035393298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03024448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035393298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005604692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0081912335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07037455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108985472","doi":"","title":"Report on the Parental Support Obligation in Section 90 of the Family Relations Act","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Section (typography); Repeal; Child support; Law; Family law; Political science; Payment; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.01982288637567921,"score_gpt":0.3058068331672106,"score_spread":0.2859839467915314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108985472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08974922,0.012513328,0.0009064059,0.098998286,0.0038352988,0.00081631436,0.008200242,0.00021311673,0.7847677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3622681,0.011795286,0.0017056233,0.05645583,0.00061536336,0.0008240897,0.0065953434,0.00012522531,0.55961525],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991959,0.0007018211,0.00038769146,0.00027824577,0.0048666024,0.0018066255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98846996,0.0038392437,0.00067149755,0.0004055144,0.0057133385,0.00090040773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004741308,0.0003334714,0.00027327813,0.001559137,0.007758847,0.0046851477,0.0015426693,0.006429796,0.006571187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0133622885,0.0005195395,0.00021602253,0.0023123391,0.0014872716,0.00085426215,0.0014439258,0.004486636,0.0013821976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003997657,0.00007187731,0.010984871,0.000122047946,0.000010827403,0.0008579823,0.010300036,0.00029851333,0.0005394378,0.05042897,0.90040344,0.025942015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012982799,0.000020624342,0.05706259,0.00048332172,0.000025436133,0.00016444328,0.010212181,0.00020829291,0.00056000927,0.001253441,0.92993003,0.00006659905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9522453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9649495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047754705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06580939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18158442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109720334","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebt017","title":"Family Law Reform in (Neoliberal) Context: British Columbia's New Family Law Act","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Family law; Law; Context (archaeology); Law reform; Political science; Best interests; Guardian; Relocation; Dispute resolution; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.024046559922244557,"score_gpt":0.3120802885177703,"score_spread":0.28803372859552573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109720334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2186636,0.024723014,0.0019904126,0.32541865,0.0025243831,0.00019777287,0.0006745511,0.00012709803,0.4256805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82490706,0.0071874633,0.0019476189,0.057113998,0.00021707508,0.00014242841,0.00018931711,0.000045894158,0.10824908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939418,0.0012377751,0.00016045435,0.0004423222,0.0022198658,0.0019978422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935209,0.0017850258,0.00026266105,0.00030018957,0.002559222,0.001572026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033603404,0.00029114736,0.00038776823,0.0014768316,0.01827141,0.009712575,0.0018804498,0.0047980146,0.0035848694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011273044,0.00037195787,0.00023767968,0.0022560058,0.012795787,0.0019203813,0.0029619008,0.0065161865,0.00032701454],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005168714,0.00011777988,0.010071068,0.0002065753,0.000023631734,0.0016526056,0.045030843,0.0015660478,0.0008064437,0.714866,0.1590264,0.066580884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036137717,0.000030560077,0.035656072,0.0006645106,0.00002822394,0.00023847733,0.02166387,0.0009627177,0.00032405477,0.02153928,0.91869617,0.0001599018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9910733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99539256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83207774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16792223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2103681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9650923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110783394","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2006.00070.x","title":"THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA UPHOLDING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF SECTION 43 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA: WHAT THIS DECISION MEANS TO THE CHILD WELFARE SECTOR*","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Section (typography); Law; Criminal code; Code (set theory); Welfare; Political science; Sociology; Criminal law; Computer science; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.03114747434942486,"score_gpt":0.2859998624272431,"score_spread":0.2548523880778183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110783394","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03848759,0.021156227,0.002432055,0.69266886,0.010814381,0.0003920409,0.0028477225,0.00021121306,0.23098984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30886397,0.0103200935,0.0045539774,0.5076431,0.0020411944,0.0002189243,0.0007225373,0.00024371257,0.1653925],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812617,0.0013788112,0.0007325731,0.0014061151,0.009109044,0.006111717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97533256,0.0074904454,0.0007012057,0.0005149399,0.01284746,0.003113404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009944194,0.0005631834,0.0009905084,0.0019806789,0.019883519,0.011570523,0.004272742,0.02229078,0.0049196715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037723698,0.0011323716,0.00117764,0.0032900823,0.006777342,0.002735412,0.002541308,0.017998284,0.0007432625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081977734,0.0000286955,0.003164927,0.00020914075,0.00005971013,0.00065102614,0.0046046763,0.00035343884,0.00094765716,0.3257847,0.64722097,0.016892994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009819676,0.00004364458,0.013381799,0.00095271866,0.00025937828,0.00020761426,0.0039868136,0.0008131304,0.0015838626,0.02185083,0.9565439,0.0002781399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9862309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9930727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08431168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08431168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2982465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6117269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110806561","doi":"10.7202/037458ar","title":"Le couple et la contractualisation de la rupture","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010337211397078513,"score_gpt":0.2876317003170923,"score_spread":0.2772944889200138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110806561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21995465,0.007837228,0.06005848,0.026720392,0.00084239483,0.00027663386,0.00033962002,0.00010725241,0.6838634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8961856,0.0030798446,0.0050320323,0.0011143432,0.00015720565,0.00018234854,0.000114748975,0.000056914287,0.09407693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944425,0.002806184,0.00019553637,0.0007110372,0.0011307623,0.0007139325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953194,0.0012667346,0.0010005673,0.000710466,0.000718668,0.0009840429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005335269,0.0004631392,0.00038213216,0.0011706917,0.0063807946,0.007954251,0.001529481,0.0024237344,0.02303226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0107839815,0.00048786477,0.0007173896,0.001323163,0.0152903,0.005807918,0.006722798,0.0035670144,0.0017873641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003838668,0.0000363847,0.003871405,0.000049191887,0.000015718926,0.0002864587,0.015374212,0.00052338187,0.00018547942,0.96009517,0.0021123602,0.017411737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059600512,0.00026198206,0.016705157,0.00081464596,0.000056963752,0.0015804105,0.04195049,0.0026653272,0.0007315477,0.47708893,0.45794758,0.00013742196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021541947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015821071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02303226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006347337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0091990465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07705057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111170202","doi":"10.7202/039650ar","title":"Health Care and Human Rights after Auton and Chaoulli","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Charter; Law; Legislation; Political science; Supreme court; Legislature; Health care; Interpretation (philosophy); Human rights; Economics","score_opus":0.016849430216867467,"score_gpt":0.32019714360296353,"score_spread":0.30334771338609606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111170202","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005032399,0.065892994,0.0017597268,0.58933836,0.0113697145,0.00009006849,0.00016033568,0.00004919655,0.32630727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22228236,0.018943373,0.0016262174,0.50774175,0.006686555,0.00021257368,0.00009393659,0.00008246901,0.2423307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935051,0.0016675082,0.00017016545,0.0009983531,0.0025613948,0.0010974321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99510455,0.0032962223,0.00014599395,0.00021549918,0.00095797924,0.00027970795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054890034,0.0007418451,0.0005926235,0.0010455262,0.013163511,0.010775958,0.0016621927,0.014942474,0.0031490673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009060198,0.00043068925,0.00057620025,0.0018644371,0.030647472,0.0051422347,0.002810033,0.022025192,0.00072754716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010683619,0.0000118977005,0.00013292434,0.000029080053,0.0000041004496,0.00014796293,0.0032130382,0.000073359646,0.0000697009,0.85277104,0.13678521,0.006751096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017930648,0.000025269512,0.0012751006,0.00042102564,0.000008986438,0.00012549554,0.0025353832,0.0002281077,0.00019210132,0.13990882,0.8552082,0.00005364116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50023717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59628016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49976283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037494764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02035665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111689120","doi":"10.7202/043863ar","title":"Note lexicographique : cy-près","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Philosophy; Doctrine; Political science; Law; Theology","score_opus":0.01767417176578603,"score_gpt":0.2811222884187279,"score_spread":0.2634481166529419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111689120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017689295,0.0076146005,0.015153597,0.012854836,0.0023684567,0.0002622559,0.010675277,0.0006911496,0.9326905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3108857,0.007876808,0.018942242,0.0035500021,0.0008241432,0.0003973609,0.0098157,0.00095304067,0.6467551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991341,0.00021323048,0.000048700404,0.00016101838,0.00030009815,0.00014277129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990515,0.00020352947,0.000049144717,0.000049441533,0.00060568284,0.000040612485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004737902,0.0007504702,0.00057233515,0.0044012996,0.007713047,0.005425464,0.0007661577,0.0010961645,0.060032435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013051112,0.00038724588,0.00033567543,0.006516918,0.005657577,0.002713429,0.0011428974,0.0026071228,0.007674585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014833327,0.000016529722,0.0010544292,0.00065802824,0.00001373848,0.00084722176,0.02272495,0.00031316772,0.0031716477,0.7335067,0.19628479,0.041260496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065988093,0.000005457979,0.0012069999,0.00013717372,0.0000054852435,0.00012672202,0.00540307,0.00013877574,0.00051454204,0.0054595466,0.9869783,0.000017329894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7316763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8214306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7316763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02430028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016100578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5398078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112600016","doi":"","title":"Child Support and Shared Parenting in Canada: A \"Reality Cheque\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child support; Family law; Publishing; Law; Family court; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Set (abstract data type); Section (typography); Cheque; Law reform; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.04553248621422363,"score_gpt":0.3132534242809266,"score_spread":0.267720938066703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112600016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5535023,0.038350128,0.0011649235,0.27221313,0.0007645648,0.00008722756,0.0004497322,0.000048921174,0.13341913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733604,0.008673902,0.00059399765,0.0099123,0.00007924358,0.000021953583,0.00006906385,0.000014054742,0.007275043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937588,0.0009062109,0.00015402824,0.00050250534,0.0020554094,0.0026231387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99252456,0.0019075486,0.00073105335,0.0002633739,0.0020096167,0.0025637716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030479655,0.0002485138,0.0005156713,0.0013865683,0.029688725,0.0072560464,0.0033723405,0.0038313002,0.003917467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011543989,0.0003764979,0.0003700755,0.003302681,0.013160667,0.002577575,0.006712776,0.006067239,0.0001267739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013553641,0.000175647,0.07222717,0.00056107185,0.00010225773,0.00625692,0.20079212,0.0013699317,0.00078236894,0.47550914,0.06640336,0.1756845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007357381,0.000109995584,0.18966742,0.0022391332,0.00017566077,0.0021599,0.38351968,0.0017071198,0.0008768882,0.041561123,0.37755772,0.00035174144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14870779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14870779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30131227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9873783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115739919","doi":"10.1177/a017399","title":"Examining the Foreseeable: Assisted Suicide as a Herald of Changing Moralities","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.1923875970825527,"score_gpt":0.40439704295322354,"score_spread":0.21200944587067083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115739919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84104365,0.0043900856,0.0010139866,0.06620599,0.00054300006,0.000021675554,0.000019477113,0.000024531118,0.08673758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99429154,0.0008575289,0.00012332627,0.001532565,0.00006981191,0.000006502759,0.0000035348107,0.0000062408444,0.0031090442],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728835,0.0019431466,0.000023268398,0.00008606611,0.00027270857,0.00038642518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971752,0.001347251,0.0005337455,0.00013249838,0.00028914073,0.000522235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032681809,0.00026000192,0.00020051526,0.00087974954,0.009310809,0.0067284238,0.0009279073,0.0027401352,0.0014051929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074566333,0.00019994691,0.0002268802,0.00050433615,0.026250536,0.0048783957,0.0040884386,0.0062567783,0.00013344672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042265496,0.00010414334,0.007801011,0.00004583839,0.000013794495,0.0019669118,0.76064193,0.00012359099,0.0003994816,0.20661804,0.0068277027,0.015415278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012392228,0.00008537862,0.011131267,0.00013612492,0.000012810279,0.0010304684,0.8663379,0.0002122891,0.0004409161,0.06102024,0.05954927,0.000030914478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011268926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032266937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011268926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061821407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00419374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04485476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117194350","doi":"10.1017/s1326011100004154","title":"Special Schooling for Indigenous Students: a New Form of Racial Discrimination?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Mainstream; Racism; Ethos; Conformity; Sociology; Special education; Indigenous education; Gender studies; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.033979342305497734,"score_gpt":0.370491552743335,"score_spread":0.3365122104378373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117194350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.929984,0.00056194176,0.00088924274,0.018733744,0.00016998034,0.000022341885,0.000030969743,0.000011176531,0.04959664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99758303,0.00018361711,0.00013826153,0.0005177132,0.00005618863,0.000005756783,0.0000052329456,0.0000017728344,0.0015084278],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998315,0.00044511078,0.00006456844,0.00019489934,0.00041928815,0.00056119525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732494,0.00046851276,0.0009820308,0.00029989658,0.00034772296,0.00057681603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016437764,0.0001260169,0.00026455952,0.0009924817,0.0045634164,0.002130792,0.00073294085,0.0014350305,0.0057624425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004593796,0.00013650802,0.00024010107,0.0010886779,0.0064456007,0.002254525,0.0036436317,0.0022079295,0.00021637646],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011015397,0.0005007261,0.33591607,0.00028786273,0.00003408163,0.0063854204,0.31661418,0.00012915902,0.0027774153,0.2296745,0.0070762206,0.10049421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031943036,0.00033965267,0.3853143,0.0007677684,0.00009395057,0.011619375,0.4524837,0.0012597521,0.0016232932,0.06321494,0.083150916,0.000100545396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020507209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045097873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020507209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002013543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025986333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040775716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118147250","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2003.tb00882.x","title":"THE EVOLUTION OF MODERN CANADIAN FAMILY LAW PROCEDURE","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Family law; Law; Equity (law); Government (linguistics); Political science; Common law; Substantive law; Civil procedure; Civil law (Civil law); Public law","score_opus":0.033959379861419545,"score_gpt":0.3046778811358444,"score_spread":0.2707185012744248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118147250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05198247,0.06331046,0.012805884,0.068413556,0.0029619227,0.00033980882,0.0015210292,0.0004367407,0.79822814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65809995,0.05642251,0.021815285,0.017087491,0.0009618472,0.00022086098,0.00081858,0.00030177154,0.24427176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99078244,0.0012508433,0.0003156983,0.0011458828,0.0054092347,0.0010959574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846919,0.0016398622,0.00044832748,0.0005671191,0.011743745,0.00090915244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064422577,0.00041007553,0.0003550011,0.0062487074,0.011235361,0.0059553324,0.002034057,0.0018516214,0.008370077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014239864,0.0005340804,0.00046081078,0.0061203004,0.00966298,0.00209096,0.0016581647,0.0026901723,0.00077732006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030282921,0.000029564442,0.0034486137,0.00032343954,0.000016784887,0.00028316153,0.007988801,0.0008822466,0.0005545488,0.75885254,0.071745865,0.15584417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007679758,0.000019360417,0.014786637,0.00024671757,0.000015742386,0.00018958516,0.0010501462,0.0004308636,0.00030123568,0.012313902,0.970578,0.00006017484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.981847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98442614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16371655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16371655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1703957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9699703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120290104","doi":"10.7202/1006437ar","title":"The Absentee Minister of Education of Canada: The Canadian federal government’s constitutional role in First Nations education","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l éducation de McGill","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada; Human Resources and Skills Development Canada; Center for Makroøkologi, Evolution og Klima; Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada; Australian Government","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Constitution; Political science; Public administration; Constitutional right; Law; Responsible government; Politics","score_opus":0.19673285836285914,"score_gpt":0.36614343438633196,"score_spread":0.16941057602347281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120290104","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0529591,0.042121064,0.0016401305,0.4713917,0.0031443764,0.00012940068,0.00097035797,0.00007993232,0.42756397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8126406,0.014384005,0.0023641654,0.06581127,0.00050269975,0.000058150777,0.0002852812,0.000056335604,0.10389747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919556,0.0010137957,0.00018586042,0.00055913324,0.0029401334,0.0033454862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938274,0.0018896316,0.00026578343,0.00017471862,0.00232654,0.001515876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059454753,0.00035528225,0.00041429282,0.0014735177,0.030672519,0.01186035,0.0022987602,0.0062239314,0.0047401893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014205775,0.0003663799,0.00035158152,0.0031050441,0.011761775,0.0033793494,0.0022980878,0.008072798,0.00029205225],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003269211,0.000024024315,0.0030979114,0.000106704756,0.0000084702115,0.00029130297,0.012879824,0.0002504714,0.0002218876,0.8425681,0.12196413,0.018554518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035224995,0.00002298778,0.022265673,0.0008236175,0.000050948456,0.00016401583,0.016026141,0.000539959,0.00047085056,0.030061414,0.9293766,0.00016259035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99740607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8325444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16745563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31784892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96563345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120311700","doi":"10.1017/s0008423901777839","title":"Culture and the Courts: A New Direction in Canadian Jurisprudence on Aboriginal Rights?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Sociology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01388306806477177,"score_gpt":0.32607648368923253,"score_spread":0.3121934156244608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120311700","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027389193,0.07727508,0.004880792,0.6677469,0.003202056,0.00002256694,0.000044518572,0.000041423,0.2193975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8651481,0.040424082,0.0031101517,0.069147974,0.0015705725,0.000040616782,0.000032024127,0.00007274293,0.02045366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98505276,0.0038909514,0.0003906273,0.0011263497,0.0062433886,0.003295909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98777944,0.006141646,0.0006671915,0.00052056153,0.0033014913,0.0015895964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009410887,0.0005022929,0.0009826196,0.0032876641,0.027739137,0.024171373,0.004030092,0.0076771853,0.0040028724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016866002,0.00053859974,0.00073293835,0.0058143227,0.097455814,0.011684945,0.0055998177,0.014412737,0.00021901124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006431345,0.0000059648646,0.00047723856,0.000049169088,0.0000060168445,0.00009771971,0.020595035,0.00012960755,0.00007984608,0.9599797,0.006839668,0.011733627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003281991,0.000027968514,0.006723701,0.001120542,0.000045048477,0.00021145343,0.06968242,0.00070455816,0.00025314683,0.5164342,0.40461713,0.00014701403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9601341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9749776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13125353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13125353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15727215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95231545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122551926","doi":"10.1017/s000842390504059x","title":"In Search of a Postcolonial Theory of Normative Integration: Reflections on A.C. Cairns' Theory of<i>Citizens Plus</i>","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Normative; Politics; Economic Justice; Sociology; State (computer science); Political science; Context (archaeology); Praxis; Charter; Scholarship; Law; Environmental ethics; History","score_opus":0.05076296494224133,"score_gpt":0.3731014638038629,"score_spread":0.3223384988616216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122551926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03249462,0.012812628,0.0075154016,0.24001133,0.0008877566,0.000038715236,0.00003583912,0.00003662169,0.706167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93186754,0.0026838114,0.0019747028,0.02040555,0.00038251822,0.00012606337,0.000024467976,0.00006805215,0.0424674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926682,0.0046387496,0.000094318384,0.00047150897,0.0011744959,0.00095274183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99504143,0.0031515753,0.0002518063,0.0002335736,0.0008571246,0.00046446253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008681216,0.0005274744,0.00057954376,0.0018844105,0.021500692,0.01445169,0.0026338976,0.006236644,0.0034152693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065106847,0.0003420959,0.00044150956,0.0028331776,0.10342593,0.011262738,0.006218931,0.010670255,0.00038014122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022429947,0.0000055069186,0.00004507023,0.000006875952,6.0543505e-7,0.00002686676,0.018983945,0.0000383259,0.000008060958,0.9779157,0.0022393933,0.00072748825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018355977,0.000011453645,0.0003844427,0.00018546927,0.000004203446,0.00007513049,0.05198309,0.00040137384,0.0001089567,0.7581225,0.18868712,0.000017939416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16965315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15359144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16965315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042197376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025371682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3373313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W212323270","doi":"","title":"More is needed to change the rules of succession for Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological succession; Constitution; Throne; Statute; Process (computing); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Biology; Ecology; Politics; Programming language","score_opus":0.05920927376977555,"score_gpt":0.32305590879065993,"score_spread":0.2638466350208844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W212323270","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014844502,0.2441585,0.003630003,0.58219993,0.01191316,0.00025893628,0.0008759802,0.00013437461,0.14198469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37590244,0.2861663,0.019420367,0.26045755,0.0025890963,0.00021621592,0.0009945392,0.0002064428,0.0540471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871423,0.0019491964,0.0006466003,0.00095561834,0.0064730863,0.0028331822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97703665,0.0051317527,0.0013269769,0.00093335647,0.013356461,0.0022148292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010470875,0.0004127267,0.0008933771,0.0026248032,0.009102341,0.008250814,0.0025574812,0.00366857,0.0074341693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029295404,0.00034466502,0.00082695426,0.0038579137,0.007130487,0.00514907,0.0019132775,0.0062120864,0.000820011],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063378,0.00007290708,0.0029515477,0.0024964584,0.000090272915,0.00025574607,0.0038400197,0.0014409752,0.0007756734,0.5642976,0.2201278,0.20358753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029747634,0.00002238734,0.0035333422,0.0019790495,0.000048239428,0.00005606662,0.0023417282,0.00012221551,0.00027914435,0.010544915,0.98097736,0.00006576987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97503114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9837266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09523652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09523652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35007355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69099253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123309974","doi":"10.24124/c677/2011230","title":"The Misrecognised as the Least the Advantaged Citizens in Plural Democracies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Political Science Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Identity (music); Sociology; Democracy; Harm; Economic Justice; Politics; Primary goods; Agency (philosophy); Social identity theory; Identity politics; Law and economics; Political science; Political economy; Social group; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.0386953619034774,"score_gpt":0.36166314992583054,"score_spread":0.32296778802235315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123309974","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23124838,0.14123581,0.0019567339,0.29007393,0.0009990336,0.000043305932,0.000054311797,0.000017105864,0.3343715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9572094,0.020345509,0.00045107433,0.013684714,0.0003684018,0.000014337537,0.000017210805,0.000013300456,0.007895964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860123,0.007349924,0.00048427173,0.0010505622,0.0033119023,0.0017911445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917425,0.004275576,0.0013641954,0.00041980098,0.0013947128,0.00080331357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009441894,0.00018320334,0.000585201,0.0024703895,0.0105736805,0.007040312,0.00071704853,0.0024370363,0.0011013917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014495069,0.00028011054,0.00022487943,0.0030043472,0.02247617,0.004188176,0.0038100337,0.003188246,0.00015819108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042560736,0.00006177398,0.011631449,0.0004695169,0.00004286972,0.0005289011,0.0749739,0.00021922802,0.00049001054,0.8205027,0.02272839,0.068308674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003229569,0.00005357595,0.03472737,0.0011979141,0.000059855163,0.00072834146,0.060798127,0.00018924693,0.00076872786,0.3464211,0.5549617,0.00006167507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12917654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2641918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12917654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014677958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014566074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25684935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124223897","doi":"10.1017/s0008423909990655","title":"“Culture and the Courts” Revisited: Group-Rights Scholarship and the Evolution of s.35(1)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Sociology; Ethnology; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015397234621218829,"score_gpt":0.2902289149570453,"score_spread":0.27483168033582644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124223897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08257683,0.01689915,0.0034608631,0.18376029,0.0007502568,0.000025282872,0.000054522956,0.000045771463,0.712427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95960295,0.001802136,0.00056239974,0.008070911,0.00015404398,0.000021060627,0.0000103781695,0.000023160415,0.029753005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951383,0.0023838645,0.000087051485,0.0005054056,0.001006271,0.0008791289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966563,0.001715851,0.00029563362,0.00022662868,0.0006201734,0.00048536627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042136386,0.00036420167,0.00038232052,0.0018984501,0.020908762,0.013157623,0.0020319102,0.005338982,0.005710611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00650717,0.00021865092,0.00031881646,0.0019303132,0.06731284,0.0049450826,0.006186499,0.0058795945,0.0003370508],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018629485,0.0000027741391,0.00016366251,0.000008322699,8.8984046e-7,0.00005124594,0.017175034,0.000036348934,0.0000171123,0.9779944,0.0022348233,0.0023134644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016851875,0.00002514665,0.0026940755,0.00048158833,0.00001574766,0.00017275699,0.05468768,0.0005269029,0.00029845917,0.59377813,0.34726572,0.000036837868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45837092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53664535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5416291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038815927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033929333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9114058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W212718114","doi":"","title":"Assisted Suicide -- what next?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Appeal; Assisted suicide; Active listening; Democracy; Political science; Law; Psychology; Criminology; Politics; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.03495969732858355,"score_gpt":0.31502527870112756,"score_spread":0.280065581372544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W212718114","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037537303,0.052752778,0.00034657842,0.91399395,0.020927873,0.000012373796,0.000048707858,0.000029219487,0.011513212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036141623,0.22660606,0.0026100809,0.6519055,0.039203428,0.0001944998,0.00034516226,0.00014346412,0.04285023],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963348,0.0018652853,0.00020174438,0.00030413232,0.00075584085,0.00053807045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98738873,0.0024592371,0.00051883067,0.0005377064,0.003915774,0.005179724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006223111,0.0006042367,0.0010222689,0.0012850375,0.004960475,0.0090664,0.0015722989,0.009607047,0.023647245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0155473985,0.00027917634,0.00067061855,0.0011057361,0.007676855,0.022689255,0.0047838525,0.019141182,0.0112923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073083866,0.00016498347,0.0017938007,0.0012850317,0.000032687123,0.00044624027,0.0016227283,0.00007112904,0.00013052337,0.07179567,0.69652057,0.2260636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025503796,0.00011337707,0.0022719852,0.0082320515,0.000024684943,0.0020271838,0.019607006,0.00010648037,0.000079419886,0.07807502,0.8893691,0.00006822905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006843729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018530661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023647245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040220963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012314918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07910794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128082881","doi":"10.7202/1000623ar","title":"Roncarelli’s Green Card: The Role of Citizenship in Randian Constitutionalism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Citizenship; Jurisprudence; Law; Economic Justice; Dissenting opinion; Constitution; Political science; Originalism; Constitutional law; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05244010886603593,"score_gpt":0.2818793899479775,"score_spread":0.2294392810819416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128082881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047707193,0.017090967,0.008392002,0.27818784,0.001279624,0.000038664664,0.00006326915,0.000072858464,0.64716756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8913305,0.004803286,0.004008803,0.039684143,0.0011537186,0.000063267624,0.000041172992,0.00008139924,0.058833655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99554884,0.0021924987,0.00009389679,0.00060911104,0.0009607194,0.0005949527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956862,0.0029300458,0.00020750017,0.00033536818,0.00059070974,0.0002502176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059559452,0.00026401549,0.00036802012,0.0010796491,0.008722761,0.0071572326,0.00091896555,0.0036189763,0.0022543697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0086744195,0.0001933571,0.00029292091,0.0011601372,0.03065797,0.006515835,0.002434075,0.0054793237,0.00030338066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004604125,0.00000376692,0.00021083042,0.000007900914,0.0000011366508,0.000024945248,0.002687902,0.000043638673,0.000032070096,0.98517007,0.008866724,0.0029464702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019228635,0.000019028064,0.0020858876,0.00020668532,0.000011223561,0.000108325476,0.00469848,0.00040111307,0.00046427533,0.45556417,0.5363754,0.000046098074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15255782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16840276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84744215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011335258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007018509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30333966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130906830","doi":"10.7202/706459ar","title":"Intervention de groupe et approche féministe en santé mentale","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Service social","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026563807737596343,"score_gpt":0.34586298938359084,"score_spread":0.31929918164599447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130906830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8544621,0.010253567,0.019250236,0.027173325,0.0013614715,0.015629256,0.00039129276,0.00019514782,0.07128364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9285099,0.0054559503,0.028887205,0.0041825958,0.00028125066,0.015688585,0.00013331069,0.000026810892,0.01683435],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889474,0.0085812565,0.00024882387,0.0005218938,0.0009647222,0.0007358773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99258876,0.004787741,0.00055556756,0.00041041448,0.00068594667,0.00097158033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010583768,0.000491285,0.0006948704,0.0008676143,0.0034804542,0.0011040979,0.0010253545,0.001252128,0.013238646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017805522,0.0002462737,0.0005406314,0.0008545605,0.001959025,0.00093078153,0.0033051106,0.0014550837,0.00067696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004393858,0.00913733,0.021098925,0.006051692,0.0003696551,0.00032546223,0.089156926,0.0006970262,0.0029616908,0.01765156,0.008163476,0.83999246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014089286,0.055972546,0.32980108,0.014212758,0.0020330187,0.00081994676,0.19699822,0.0024096107,0.010462695,0.038861558,0.33407906,0.00026024017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021802956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06324411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021802956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043798285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014746574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055972993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131266742","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2015.17","title":"<i>The Coxford Lecture</i> Patriation and Patrimony: The Path to the Charter","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Parliament; House of Commons; Charter; Law; Constitution; Opposition (politics); Political science; Polity; Supreme court; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Responsible government; Politics","score_opus":0.028279321259348667,"score_gpt":0.28991203106191815,"score_spread":0.2616327098025695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131266742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014058682,0.06588606,0.0035460847,0.31286517,0.04334042,0.000039137536,0.00013567046,0.00014474889,0.57263696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09669147,0.03662663,0.0021455253,0.033680793,0.025375426,0.000091710746,0.0001251706,0.0003408035,0.8049225],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978624,0.00065656786,0.000054624234,0.00023437657,0.00072294346,0.0004691809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780613,0.001067275,0.00012290699,0.00015096179,0.00048124525,0.00037154465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022539117,0.0006050143,0.000365632,0.0013888857,0.009906825,0.01066867,0.001147813,0.0042096074,0.024909368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056085577,0.0004576583,0.00026994664,0.0017308885,0.01926606,0.0089615295,0.0018535171,0.009691927,0.0062384414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007210605,0.0000065113695,0.000051701525,0.000025088595,5.8462433e-7,0.00002203024,0.00095301884,0.000027879023,0.000035079254,0.3533238,0.633533,0.012013962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015849832,0.000003322421,0.000114364426,0.00009637625,6.0456e-7,0.000019099221,0.0004314486,0.00003812342,0.0000434626,0.017820006,0.9814254,0.000006177272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17941333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28248766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9774632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022536822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014013671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35673803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131284740","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.01296.x","title":"PARENTAL ALIENATION: CANADIAN COURT CASES 1989–2008","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Citation; Family court; Sociology; Law; History; Library science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04782442497088262,"score_gpt":0.3398939775480977,"score_spread":0.29206955257721506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131284740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4295287,0.1438991,0.0005919214,0.07836659,0.0030402755,0.0009047207,0.028243838,0.00010222267,0.3153226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.811624,0.049695235,0.0010455747,0.030233731,0.00088419655,0.00035004597,0.008547888,0.000055626435,0.09756375],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99057835,0.0004892691,0.0004770982,0.0006269621,0.005151717,0.0026765235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815083,0.0035302062,0.002584269,0.00049622176,0.010115468,0.0017655449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075195828,0.0004991664,0.0005864014,0.0071977526,0.015643414,0.0031926727,0.003226668,0.004006788,0.0041616885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023724,0.00060302933,0.0006215376,0.014972262,0.0024965366,0.0008346595,0.0021139989,0.0027849532,0.00041264607],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005656177,0.00013478687,0.07351684,0.0022113838,0.0003049004,0.0069383206,0.027682545,0.00092191837,0.0009638339,0.045715835,0.7165828,0.124461226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111560876,0.000045168046,0.39840922,0.0013498674,0.00030529065,0.0010128361,0.010886735,0.00024672714,0.0005834244,0.0009636277,0.585948,0.00013763428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9943329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11330699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11330699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17078364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8221036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131415381","doi":"10.1002/crq.3890190205","title":"Advice by any other name…","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conflict Resolution Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Neutrality; Impartiality; Mediation; Intervention (counseling); Context (archaeology); Autonomy; Law; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Public relations","score_opus":0.0291854469014019,"score_gpt":0.3138707570777506,"score_spread":0.2846853101763487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131415381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003847835,0.0033342289,0.0055437493,0.036255494,0.01245645,0.00012027409,0.00027227448,0.0016177263,0.93655187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0221998,0.0016480153,0.002031217,0.010837385,0.0012585963,0.000057011242,0.00011570365,0.00028216033,0.96157014],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877363,0.0003534225,0.00007607491,0.00016532384,0.00045138854,0.00018012433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974228,0.0007887182,0.0002537891,0.00029185944,0.000714754,0.00052818126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009931126,0.00031103246,0.00031792014,0.00068028783,0.0019367593,0.0020547144,0.0008852666,0.0017846089,0.29469562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007154133,0.00016906332,0.00033139455,0.000629257,0.00084516726,0.0019608617,0.0018553813,0.0021037234,0.1904588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043098076,0.00008001405,0.00072652934,0.00017192207,0.000008088796,0.00035551234,0.0019396021,0.000039505816,0.0006541346,0.022384308,0.758714,0.21488327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030086978,0.000015088418,0.00020562414,0.000061878614,0.000002035818,0.00013953008,0.0002554484,0.000037511738,0.00010332245,0.0010297835,0.9981425,0.0000042400916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022511897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040392745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29469562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007654615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012615625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98585504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132778664","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0025.2011.01733.x","title":"Ministers of the Law: A Natural Law Theory of Legal Authority – By Jean Porter","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Natural law; Philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Political science; History","score_opus":0.033251947240573204,"score_gpt":0.281199403572243,"score_spread":0.24794745633166979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132778664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008121122,0.20103346,0.009843862,0.27490425,0.0049464502,0.000080786864,0.00012996409,0.00007827899,0.5008619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4143983,0.16806453,0.011075556,0.05514576,0.016891673,0.00016663277,0.00031511675,0.00020690185,0.3337355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879766,0.0005731469,0.0000345635,0.0001328753,0.00035109353,0.00011065786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921465,0.00037836345,0.000106764004,0.000024353498,0.00015399285,0.000121920646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016383429,0.00029606605,0.00028361336,0.0010582323,0.0026795657,0.004839075,0.0006435727,0.0020651557,0.0030924159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021245962,0.00037753335,0.00033160503,0.0012710631,0.0073186685,0.006941885,0.001586858,0.004075828,0.0011302432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008014652,0.000020857633,0.00020156667,0.00006835035,0.0000047217054,0.00007493186,0.0024770305,0.00038617678,0.00009316487,0.836561,0.14776567,0.012338581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007497549,0.000011816041,0.0008632834,0.00031528395,0.000003828746,0.00013994443,0.0012324891,0.0005933444,0.00003572899,0.22895892,0.767821,0.000016856222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014538879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013135141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014538879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006831075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040765405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04956317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133808670","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.21.1.55","title":"Penguins and Polyamory: Using Law and Film to Explore the Essence of Marriage in Canadian Family Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Legalization; Context (archaeology); Family law; Sociology; Popularity; Law; Sodomy; Value (mathematics); Gender studies; Criminology; Political science; History; Homosexuality","score_opus":0.054451489957730026,"score_gpt":0.29393273377880597,"score_spread":0.23948124382107594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133808670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6258065,0.011141496,0.0019801492,0.02475874,0.0006824047,0.00011627089,0.0003323308,0.00006824147,0.33511385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797387,0.003688913,0.0007634084,0.0012236267,0.000065166634,0.000035773814,0.00006425944,0.000031520132,0.014388505],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985152,0.00059144315,0.000025692309,0.00012477783,0.00033399797,0.00040888268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977615,0.0013165935,0.0001661329,0.00008939065,0.00035581313,0.00031063057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014807421,0.0006453072,0.00039846238,0.004049481,0.02717328,0.010102878,0.0017876934,0.002237542,0.005207458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005836648,0.0003534275,0.00028746598,0.0041274186,0.024532983,0.0041688723,0.003904523,0.0031291666,0.00020625014],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020777527,0.00001659685,0.002227343,0.00007569564,0.000005250887,0.00057538814,0.94568604,0.00005562179,0.00040524706,0.03481958,0.004484596,0.011627776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004830117,0.000017643133,0.009701332,0.00020522889,0.000015527394,0.00021518514,0.8407443,0.00014376709,0.0001917252,0.0025099264,0.14621864,0.000031883734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9581799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9857244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059483685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059483685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028875334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43158638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136048620","doi":"","title":"Why Marriage is Still the Best Default in Estate Planning Conflicts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Estate; Cohabitation; Estate planning; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03467643524819757,"score_gpt":0.30600192831716455,"score_spread":0.27132549306896697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136048620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76200736,0.0014651106,0.0048539317,0.046183124,0.00018330174,0.00005274687,0.00006107684,0.000045300018,0.18514813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954006,0.00015312764,0.00024016401,0.0012484619,0.00001612092,0.000012425246,0.0000071611917,0.0000060020757,0.0029160317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949903,0.0019303081,0.00016540689,0.0004426887,0.0005327637,0.0019384286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982686,0.0004495165,0.00024883143,0.00015811123,0.0002921264,0.0005827517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004562931,0.00013403899,0.00031159638,0.00058696535,0.018670449,0.004454781,0.0011226434,0.0038531336,0.003939166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073853824,0.00031918503,0.00023106563,0.0006113269,0.017698433,0.005182952,0.0054296465,0.0051199095,0.00024147789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044138495,0.00007289904,0.020276254,0.000035139165,0.000012133144,0.0026958198,0.10039353,0.00039743062,0.00047433944,0.8485765,0.008299968,0.018721735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006675478,0.00010468742,0.03327752,0.0004232393,0.000031418476,0.003266924,0.49332803,0.0017985887,0.00087305723,0.3441943,0.12253387,0.00010160848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.083013006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17288478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083013006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007528466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077758594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16505963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138651256","doi":"10.1177/0964663911418719","title":"The Crown in a Multicultural Age: The Changing Epistemology of (Post)colonial Sovereignty","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Sociology; Law; Sovereignty; Honour; State (computer science); Scrutiny; Colonialism; Indigenous; Doctrine; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.04925453594051131,"score_gpt":0.35955331606683916,"score_spread":0.31029878012632783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138651256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4739733,0.03620574,0.0034733699,0.0970536,0.0006714806,0.000028157474,0.000059905142,0.000045754634,0.38848868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99174106,0.002255923,0.00036076547,0.0016317738,0.000067437635,0.00000498453,0.000006284916,0.000011370586,0.003920401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597114,0.001426953,0.000082277424,0.00044878747,0.00091509125,0.0011558231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99547523,0.0018768115,0.0002629943,0.00023821337,0.0011379588,0.0010088797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00561516,0.0003590716,0.0005174621,0.0025026987,0.0354472,0.018473146,0.0020404942,0.002715121,0.0024107047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054494147,0.0002695462,0.00026917615,0.002800268,0.09729985,0.005971091,0.006137545,0.0053685056,0.00013377237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012959357,0.000008935447,0.0018046753,0.000045650966,0.0000058989785,0.00033654252,0.4450421,0.0001031714,0.00015818563,0.538966,0.0032507633,0.010265099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013520234,0.000028716637,0.010866662,0.00064993225,0.000031884272,0.00049777696,0.5691706,0.0006523325,0.00036890077,0.14727263,0.27036858,0.00007845217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9152052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93590057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9152052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07533888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.067820236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54662436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139087767","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01412.x","title":"THE “EYE OF THE BEHOLDER”: PROFESSIONAL OPINIONS ABOUT THE BEST INTERESTS OF A CHILD","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Child custody; State (computer science); Function (biology); Best interests; Psychology; Political science; Law; Empirical research; Social psychology; Public relations; Computer science","score_opus":0.1021398112332396,"score_gpt":0.37622963121187525,"score_spread":0.27408981997863563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139087767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50196517,0.08805892,0.0025821163,0.14645217,0.0005128361,0.00009681694,0.000105741536,0.000018553996,0.26020768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753975,0.014374776,0.00086403545,0.00491614,0.00013297256,0.000017005756,0.000022691116,0.000006522651,0.004268221],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9733831,0.017585149,0.0008546472,0.00081232097,0.0061406363,0.0012241766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.967187,0.022389166,0.0035692833,0.00046191586,0.005527692,0.0008649383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021344295,0.00015661381,0.000336625,0.0018170099,0.005955742,0.0058960915,0.0011722607,0.0025540167,0.0016035226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060097747,0.00023533992,0.00019088468,0.0013958028,0.011654,0.002692897,0.0020778507,0.001786091,0.00018773296],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014209072,0.0000622325,0.051540572,0.0012941562,0.000093593895,0.004148644,0.5092881,0.0004129708,0.0018074719,0.1658623,0.04520264,0.22014533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037257058,0.000096227566,0.10914487,0.0038109354,0.00013611882,0.0017920855,0.5026815,0.00041561786,0.0013438751,0.037716318,0.3426997,0.0001254849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3489808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6081111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3489808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01903126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02445789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69389904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139515735","doi":"10.15496/publikation-57927","title":"Canadian Judicial Nomination Processes and the Press : ‘Interesting, in a Sleepy Sort of Way’","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Supreme court; Politics; Political science; Law; Judicial activism; Federalist; Sociology","score_opus":0.028050422262285463,"score_gpt":0.33282146231807874,"score_spread":0.30477104005579325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139515735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84995043,0.0043244776,0.001593027,0.02153122,0.00036413668,0.00013724966,0.00091843575,0.0000894967,0.12109155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98611623,0.0014109835,0.0005028618,0.001681877,0.00008924479,0.00004954409,0.000220386,0.000056959023,0.009871939],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99042094,0.0036616542,0.00026056037,0.0006807793,0.0033249247,0.0016511633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97896373,0.012466278,0.0019678841,0.00067844166,0.0044985777,0.0014250269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006203426,0.00054542866,0.00040862506,0.005594725,0.022413643,0.012874772,0.0016711521,0.0016256775,0.00525474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022247257,0.0005016197,0.00021971024,0.01097832,0.018180523,0.0042326828,0.003072935,0.0028163104,0.00041267555],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003086919,0.000014375207,0.010235641,0.00017342017,0.000007814695,0.00047943756,0.96032304,0.000032847798,0.0010937782,0.010255295,0.0048052357,0.012548261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005754106,0.000019636775,0.03145805,0.00015294107,0.0000129650125,0.00014227016,0.8402119,0.00007562595,0.0004356154,0.00057933823,0.12685528,0.000050628478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.873914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9178351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.126086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044965226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035719834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32624704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139791020","doi":"10.3138/ecf.24.3.403","title":"Rethinking Gender and Virtue through Richardson's Domestic Accounting","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Soundness; Accounting; Order (exchange); Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Political science; Linguistics; Finance","score_opus":0.04180827621645613,"score_gpt":0.30995365895821786,"score_spread":0.26814538274176175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139791020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11971061,0.0018889871,0.019683018,0.03229198,0.0006335098,0.000044519278,0.00006555678,0.00010339508,0.8255784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96984875,0.00033158742,0.0018504555,0.0009552541,0.000090865964,0.000023794466,0.0000072585494,0.000035455072,0.026856573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969681,0.002248896,0.000053187643,0.0002233838,0.00023211144,0.00027432037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763334,0.0015161405,0.0001976725,0.00035196787,0.00017649497,0.00012442854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002909293,0.00037792782,0.00035171394,0.0011106922,0.005833146,0.0077768816,0.00083774823,0.0018421982,0.0039645857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071767666,0.00025432388,0.00026071488,0.0007248516,0.038636737,0.006528704,0.0044024554,0.0034721075,0.0004975992],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074449786,0.000003852207,0.00008115125,0.00000883128,5.9877254e-7,0.00008754733,0.025623696,0.000055062697,0.000051832638,0.97107196,0.0013276644,0.0016803837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017494716,0.000043262608,0.00059382594,0.00020479766,0.000009691972,0.00054429035,0.049392357,0.0009987573,0.001005087,0.5497312,0.3974208,0.000038427002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005991088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008686849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077768816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006362868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020604176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046166062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139881082","doi":"10.15353/cjds.v4i3.231","title":"Reflections on Law in Light of Everyday Life at L’Arche","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Disability Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Scrutiny; Law; Harm; Agency (philosophy); Pluralism (philosophy); Legal pluralism; Epistemology; Legal profession; Political science; Legal realism; Social science","score_opus":0.23962813401024216,"score_gpt":0.42983948222294655,"score_spread":0.19021134821270438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139881082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4968669,0.020082962,0.004881226,0.2621603,0.0017581236,0.00015214276,0.00019490912,0.00017572538,0.21372774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9623557,0.0021507074,0.00068203616,0.008161749,0.00014440827,0.000054713637,0.00001804624,0.00006907441,0.026363676],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889115,0.007111957,0.00009819129,0.00058275537,0.0010931755,0.0022024114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909951,0.005143796,0.00042943074,0.00033300882,0.0010978288,0.0020008618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0089802835,0.0009793522,0.00094341923,0.0026613746,0.05641277,0.019492751,0.003419246,0.008373248,0.0058380095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01118227,0.0007488664,0.0005606234,0.0023600447,0.10945404,0.00937118,0.010674681,0.0146299675,0.00069031026],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008636879,0.000019110857,0.00036315335,0.000027486953,0.000002214919,0.00071968685,0.93843305,0.00004066936,0.0002603096,0.052753795,0.005297948,0.0020739792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051216375,0.000016047523,0.0011003546,0.00017341708,0.000003968542,0.00028591696,0.8465679,0.000054883756,0.00017842471,0.0057990034,0.14577289,0.000042028776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7985809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8364443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20141912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.084700055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02597943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61454475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141784587","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1449","title":"Relational Contract and Other Models of Marriage","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Supreme court; Compensation (psychology); Flexibility (engineering); Relational contract; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Law; Social contract; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.08311789173557932,"score_gpt":0.293750347285705,"score_spread":0.21063245555012566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141784587","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030991614,0.004534604,0.14808685,0.017509347,0.00025465523,0.00019540462,0.000280514,0.000084290186,0.7980626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93591404,0.002799664,0.019252354,0.0015434547,0.00022635005,0.00023640138,0.00018993847,0.000040263018,0.039797522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99569833,0.0014856219,0.00011924085,0.00044590488,0.0014569936,0.0007938659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977507,0.00072981877,0.00030565044,0.00035829333,0.00044281775,0.00041265233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038330988,0.00046278528,0.0004873191,0.0019107653,0.006620565,0.00678077,0.0020972167,0.0029143612,0.010269809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061340528,0.00024955638,0.0011119022,0.0028987247,0.020048406,0.0072044213,0.0032914225,0.0026980808,0.0007530162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.897708e-7,0.0000016170824,0.00005401897,0.000002349446,5.673419e-7,0.000007895139,0.00028767163,0.00013392512,0.0000036242502,0.99890625,0.00015247776,0.00044883863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005006074,0.0000071572604,0.00031299918,0.000035023917,0.0000036125477,0.00008808296,0.00079613324,0.0021252646,0.000022658496,0.9636408,0.032954384,0.0000088966735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13520408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06287745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13520408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015631745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011609777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26883417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143369584","doi":"10.24043/isj.233","title":"Island Words, Island Worlds: The Origins and Meanings of Words for ‘Islands’ in North-West Europe","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Island Studies Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Linguistic relativity; Linguistics; History; Geography; Philosophy; Psychology; Cognition; Computer science","score_opus":0.03600193495479402,"score_gpt":0.3263464874746684,"score_spread":0.29034455251987434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143369584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88016784,0.01431419,0.0048672836,0.0019792719,0.00021337844,0.000014471273,0.00008188557,0.000016038051,0.09834553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99627656,0.0014475214,0.0007244862,0.00007901311,0.000015382357,0.00000483052,0.000032794607,0.00000839736,0.0014108834],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992968,0.00035300522,0.000078104116,0.000066932764,0.0001233457,0.00008184328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992269,0.0004195967,0.00015912931,0.00004949773,0.000095982956,0.000048885013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009858016,0.00021217162,0.00023739117,0.0015592359,0.00201238,0.0035505637,0.00034144736,0.0005849495,0.0015188552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018127925,0.00013979488,0.00012187579,0.0020244892,0.0069159684,0.0047586584,0.0020605284,0.00095200265,0.00015366141],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009142167,0.00001675741,0.015800122,0.00034070344,0.0000254184,0.0010897759,0.56336486,0.0002084582,0.0019645547,0.3688327,0.0022497752,0.046015438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010001969,0.000066902634,0.054886695,0.00074399705,0.00003947576,0.0023913602,0.6874808,0.00030141682,0.0009540297,0.053071324,0.19999415,0.00005975499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003444177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058437022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035505637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010936023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006070562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00793463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144679562","doi":"","title":"Rob Ford and the End of Honour","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œinnovation journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Accountability; Politics; Law; Honour; Impunity; Impeachment; Sociology; Redress; Political science","score_opus":0.028220912771818044,"score_gpt":0.2996783678982941,"score_spread":0.27145745512647607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144679562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10816241,0.0055014943,0.0020817777,0.2382911,0.0026499822,0.000024013787,0.00006463023,0.00011927141,0.64310527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9038851,0.00056513667,0.0002150096,0.015916761,0.0002994288,0.000009020158,0.000012935304,0.000073051546,0.07902358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947373,0.0016964845,0.00008728271,0.00072385196,0.00096165156,0.0017933765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947917,0.0019207916,0.0005148711,0.00036920048,0.00094110845,0.0014623018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036078824,0.00022445916,0.00033001113,0.00088663236,0.024383696,0.00932356,0.0008314624,0.004530012,0.011364206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00890148,0.00032721192,0.00015390893,0.00056072656,0.03061425,0.0040492043,0.0036646887,0.0063338,0.0015702238],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000540587,0.000038670507,0.0032984845,0.000039400355,0.000007809075,0.0008734081,0.07314125,0.000083254396,0.00018754743,0.70747656,0.19126274,0.023536837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010955448,0.000022398828,0.0028988356,0.00013269496,0.0000041667736,0.00027752938,0.040200662,0.00013007554,0.00027020785,0.053042825,0.9029666,0.000043022425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12746735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23800792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87253267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0131648425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006650506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2534508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146611038","doi":"10.1017/s000842390427010x","title":"Women's Legal Strategies in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Harm; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.021430259661100546,"score_gpt":0.28752328647730746,"score_spread":0.2660930268162069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146611038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16851647,0.15773456,0.0010485465,0.27665353,0.0023534298,0.00014517401,0.0008472565,0.00011102601,0.39258996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8427428,0.050954573,0.0012245525,0.014709332,0.0002099749,0.000058959406,0.00022327146,0.000069452544,0.08980708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99634874,0.00036509722,0.00007077409,0.0002352282,0.0013132568,0.0016668116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996675,0.0005130919,0.00018608957,0.00003862702,0.0012179996,0.0013692345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018022835,0.0005409512,0.00054379867,0.0032113744,0.040046312,0.015208111,0.0022025798,0.0036717257,0.0055689667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003642673,0.0004387439,0.00032223182,0.0076159895,0.01590046,0.0021633941,0.0031758286,0.0035467092,0.00032631162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044963595,0.00006501519,0.008644949,0.00046721296,0.00003474895,0.0008953313,0.21716201,0.0008083355,0.00047425018,0.38773808,0.2741388,0.109526314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015681158,0.000014631342,0.015842108,0.00058978,0.00002832675,0.00017400445,0.13676138,0.00032291893,0.00029307452,0.009000948,0.8368731,0.00008397895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99815637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29149824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.29149824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41115543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8217616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146858425","doi":"10.1017/s0008423902778190","title":"Health Care as Citizenship Development: Examining Social Rights and Entitlement","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Right to health; Health care; Political science; Citizenship; Individualism; Health care reform; Politics; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Normative; Law and economics; Health policy; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.06983479212860008,"score_gpt":0.33510879639768903,"score_spread":0.265274004269089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146858425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49525908,0.0030792137,0.0031983783,0.09571024,0.000081519785,0.000042338037,0.000063938525,0.000013091356,0.40255225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978217,0.00029014275,0.00017329809,0.00056641526,0.000015364205,0.0000120358345,0.0000073521605,0.0000025819072,0.0011111627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929212,0.0039113136,0.0000917738,0.00029655188,0.0007751073,0.0020041561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99418855,0.003153159,0.0007135484,0.00024174622,0.0006063452,0.0010966386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004736187,0.00024321594,0.0003230756,0.0026745903,0.010009024,0.009275753,0.0009506095,0.0021850127,0.002918783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076611172,0.00012839412,0.00034585095,0.0030094762,0.06563407,0.007884685,0.008286578,0.0026215033,0.00010376602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005192464,0.00002414019,0.0051345658,0.000015555102,0.0000038665726,0.00005887086,0.030602897,0.0001779926,0.000033240725,0.9589033,0.00050595263,0.004534435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017545693,0.00003643369,0.037865013,0.00025290065,0.000016987002,0.00012419942,0.17446493,0.0014469832,0.0001945894,0.72278994,0.06276423,0.000026276886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23602301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2524695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.763977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02945036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025575092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46929842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147152902","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2012.00242.x","title":"Policy-based reasoning in duty of care cases","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Welfare; Interpersonal communication; Economic Justice; Imperfect; Duty of care; Sample (material); Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0574952330479269,"score_gpt":0.3888278032987518,"score_spread":0.33133257025082485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147152902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18310136,0.00363648,0.23139162,0.11462574,0.0007911787,0.0010026108,0.00023335777,0.00010653252,0.46511117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9659548,0.0006167049,0.021585008,0.0062669087,0.0002109362,0.00027038783,0.00006609092,0.000026946607,0.0050023105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.880072,0.06656301,0.007032703,0.0084863035,0.02647645,0.011369508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8592956,0.11948402,0.00614302,0.0047389157,0.008813475,0.001524995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.117209196,0.000542701,0.0013750539,0.0054831216,0.013144749,0.015356534,0.006055957,0.012602881,0.0048416313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14662577,0.0011171965,0.0014379703,0.003093047,0.033293102,0.015155932,0.008738046,0.009474787,0.00049962604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008916542,0.000019847274,0.0009276628,0.000038194357,0.000010217866,0.0002668244,0.0064843404,0.0009484801,0.00009979927,0.98732495,0.0008285502,0.0030420981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003156557,0.00001706582,0.0014348008,0.00044104786,0.000021418671,0.00018179462,0.010394501,0.004045915,0.0005816155,0.9436916,0.03909515,0.00006340142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.065572985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048414897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117209196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030111559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0342807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6198689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147912637","doi":"10.1017/s0034670500036597","title":"Getting a Facelift - David Braybrooke: Natural Law Modernized. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001. Pp. Xiii, 351. $70.00.)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Politics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Political science; Natural (archaeology); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02910546585285181,"score_gpt":0.31470936155353285,"score_spread":0.28560389570068107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147912637","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004720391,0.87000155,0.00058422866,0.09732361,0.0019139795,0.000009646044,0.00017678969,0.000053163305,0.029464979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.046738263,0.7639021,0.0014801857,0.026466254,0.0032991783,0.00005903427,0.00038933093,0.00015817763,0.1575074],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992925,0.0002757614,0.000030591716,0.000068477544,0.00023707299,0.000095514595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989691,0.00041365277,0.000105560655,0.00006366398,0.0002833862,0.00016465627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011314012,0.0011629409,0.00050962623,0.0027196505,0.004090408,0.0050300388,0.0013260305,0.0038801432,0.02513076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025555731,0.000811782,0.0003627313,0.003959435,0.00824877,0.012051054,0.0016592266,0.003405775,0.0054313513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011427042,0.000006559082,0.00019691065,0.00032375386,0.000007779868,0.00010345051,0.0035896178,0.000060110622,0.000058998652,0.039079886,0.923571,0.03299054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069253033,0.0000057241714,0.002517424,0.001060594,0.000009141182,0.00017020671,0.0049492395,0.000050629726,0.000069764144,0.032810874,0.9583329,0.00001665034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25328743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56101286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25328743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011287605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007724148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5036263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148682650","doi":"","title":"Editors' Introduction: Indignation, Socio-economic Inequality and the Role of Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indignation; Economic inequality; Inequality; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Sociology; Criminology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2003393846415093,"score_gpt":0.5265616311312397,"score_spread":0.32622224648973036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148682650","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001750866,0.050782,0.0003813972,0.14578798,0.7873273,0.000029686069,0.00031805874,0.0000809693,0.015117518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003928167,0.051551454,0.00045027435,0.060793377,0.84135383,0.00012106519,0.00030277987,0.00013992297,0.041359242],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740905,0.0005842953,0.000237358,0.0005290204,0.0010309693,0.00020928419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867077,0.008260699,0.0005338016,0.00029000503,0.0030353523,0.0011725228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040089204,0.0031427073,0.0019978704,0.0041656448,0.0035287314,0.009481534,0.003910447,0.0066187684,0.026005173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015164575,0.0006756909,0.0016501625,0.0038673147,0.0033290237,0.006014601,0.0031904094,0.011331588,0.008766061],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008061003,0.0000074626573,0.000047741945,0.0001566681,0.000003859572,0.000020178904,0.00011506352,0.00002297913,0.00001262146,0.0026391696,0.99244726,0.0045188284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015233578,0.000022620323,0.00050766027,0.00078216253,0.0000133411295,0.000070614704,0.00039973875,0.00009046041,0.00003169807,0.0047000875,0.9933467,0.000019670408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028359718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004269566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026005173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003149085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003064904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08699602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149513766","doi":"","title":"Sex and the Supremes: Towards a Legal Theory of Sexuality","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human sexuality; Gender studies; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.006938306616129642,"score_gpt":0.19576675187090356,"score_spread":0.1888284452547739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149513766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04960692,0.025743878,0.013651584,0.10308119,0.0009119876,0.000042112828,0.00010545718,0.00004010968,0.80681676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94221276,0.0071767895,0.002329757,0.0074571273,0.0005938186,0.000036758487,0.000060637576,0.00003667557,0.040095605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730045,0.0010852141,0.0000502649,0.00020968931,0.0008169501,0.00053744286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984602,0.00071633165,0.00014014148,0.00009745255,0.0003058882,0.00028002713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002128036,0.00025450825,0.0003539614,0.0021101919,0.010304851,0.011229615,0.0017014295,0.002909957,0.00392257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027056513,0.00026918258,0.00045737348,0.0016822827,0.06850889,0.006312157,0.0036571245,0.0065224464,0.0003686979],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.0387887e-7,0.000002066293,0.00016684097,0.0000039744373,3.968603e-7,0.000020255284,0.0038527069,0.000036928323,0.000010283476,0.9938618,0.0006651302,0.0013789542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007534822,0.000011591122,0.0013037979,0.00017869096,0.0000043521172,0.00008645167,0.009509122,0.00034415248,0.000065891945,0.8136656,0.17480782,0.000014998837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42849872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3713701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57150126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029343132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023086768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8520092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151063462","doi":"","title":"The Academic Year in Review: Selected Family Law Publications 2010-11","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Legislation; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.023439981720349713,"score_gpt":0.3260461761196724,"score_spread":0.3026061943993227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151063462","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00068608514,0.84837896,0.00039055207,0.030249283,0.08303693,0.0003747927,0.0029337243,0.0002438732,0.033705916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005572091,0.88724744,0.0012046394,0.022471989,0.032871965,0.0010500236,0.0041005537,0.00035503958,0.04512624],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906652,0.0014610331,0.0015040482,0.00053925125,0.0047883233,0.0010420727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9362623,0.008027039,0.007805274,0.0011414702,0.03869609,0.0080677755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0135201365,0.0013035422,0.0023549474,0.033668444,0.0021091097,0.0099727735,0.0019521846,0.0028316677,0.032991104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048409242,0.0009301609,0.0009792896,0.037883807,0.0010782501,0.0068392325,0.0032439877,0.002635153,0.017568577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004988072,0.000014450618,0.00020592005,0.005860309,0.00002149851,0.00007533855,0.00015148372,0.000016767872,0.00010475704,0.00052914233,0.9248782,0.06809215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012585438,0.000018954137,0.0015609952,0.0077652005,0.000025865713,0.00009581314,0.00019066916,0.0000065579075,0.000047635887,0.00013542548,0.9901264,0.0000139939375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011957148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037202816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033668444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012162852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027031804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110366285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153339687","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720130902.2558","title":"Influence of Culture over Marital Love and Fidelity in Ancient Rome and Ugboha of Edo State","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fidelity; Order (exchange); State (computer science); Sociology; Content (measure theory); Literature; History; Art; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.013784838200123852,"score_gpt":0.2894973531261724,"score_spread":0.2757125149260486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153339687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.989287,0.0003846692,0.000037930236,0.00014551007,0.0000073178817,0.0000036357453,0.000006033376,7.6752605e-7,0.010127061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993093,0.00015087418,0.000018970888,0.000017002654,0.0000025468676,0.0000012168604,0.0000025197655,4.2459857e-7,0.0004972018],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993094,0.00037537102,0.000024412595,0.00005034637,0.00008844055,0.00015199446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945015,0.00030908958,0.00012341113,0.000025483601,0.000037663038,0.0000542459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071937154,0.000114363356,0.00025526038,0.00086488714,0.0036401106,0.0017301241,0.00024535824,0.0002432282,0.0015734147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016953939,0.00013845396,0.00008117282,0.0009454294,0.0050305375,0.0005080759,0.001742744,0.00046017865,0.00005808839],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019046234,0.00009346964,0.12922378,0.00018655612,0.000024475994,0.0017989979,0.8019771,0.000093841205,0.001435157,0.02318676,0.00045986313,0.041329574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009564955,0.00009647152,0.31103748,0.00015725469,0.000025039815,0.0008204205,0.66626745,0.00009530941,0.00047867556,0.0010618924,0.019930037,0.000020432126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028506156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.093564235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028506156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023837597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010375269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0566805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154326197","doi":"10.7202/1008148ar","title":"L’union libre, le mariage romain et le mariage chrétien","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Enfances Familles Générations","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030089543165289098,"score_gpt":0.3147338605324139,"score_spread":0.2846443173671248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154326197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17470966,0.017162813,0.0025947592,0.046461586,0.0010345433,0.0000660967,0.00032080014,0.00017525017,0.7574745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45422673,0.0024908723,0.0010936927,0.003917687,0.00007707548,0.000044399647,0.00010926391,0.00008103768,0.5379593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901986,0.00025309678,0.00001692047,0.00015829573,0.0002173766,0.0003344799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994357,0.00008841403,0.00005673341,0.00003545698,0.00017583164,0.00020781392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008100353,0.00035135655,0.00030447103,0.0007476937,0.013298549,0.004760454,0.00094699214,0.0017960028,0.021053124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016695585,0.00025301884,0.00021176094,0.0010391829,0.0069023184,0.0013582349,0.0021511947,0.002298838,0.0020707133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010586331,0.00004766335,0.007574543,0.00025934697,0.000032913988,0.0016280008,0.09780799,0.00045546403,0.0009884033,0.70552474,0.11703231,0.0685427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064999613,0.000016865697,0.010581944,0.00021954125,0.0000118192775,0.00021568395,0.025863992,0.00014895207,0.00022932544,0.0032729355,0.9593967,0.000035733054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92472893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9656257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92472893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03165152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030372899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22964895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154577241","doi":"10.1177/174035530500300216","title":"Patricia Bays, Anglican Diversity: Challenges for the 21st Century (Toronto: ABC Publishing, 2001), pp. 128. ISBN 1-55126-327-0, pbk. US$11.95.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Anglican Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Diversity (politics); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07238933906941378,"score_gpt":0.3310435114781334,"score_spread":0.2586541724087196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154577241","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005558917,0.9289119,0.00057486095,0.046733323,0.0027623367,0.000022023034,0.00021649276,0.0000837963,0.020139413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014991973,0.9118933,0.0016670072,0.0075285127,0.0030429938,0.00006900373,0.00029912713,0.00012238105,0.060385726],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916863,0.0003442704,0.00006680329,0.00007875774,0.00025604852,0.00008549406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998171,0.0008714254,0.00016507511,0.00006209201,0.0005195094,0.00021098573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017882166,0.0014304243,0.0008075347,0.003424147,0.003893661,0.0053498265,0.0018578157,0.0034655754,0.029243598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003369316,0.001210468,0.00032292042,0.0055967784,0.0031535132,0.00924592,0.0014991594,0.0037209007,0.014677006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002550223,0.000013025427,0.00036997243,0.0008079384,0.00001314228,0.00012708733,0.0057011293,0.000052276104,0.00007693174,0.010160363,0.92533535,0.05731728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009516821,0.000010671109,0.004648054,0.0018128346,0.00001690452,0.0004782858,0.0067974785,0.0000663709,0.0001319403,0.009306526,0.9766961,0.000025409818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10917021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23994248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10917021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038730777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005252691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2170695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157332901","doi":"","title":"Report on the Recognition of Adult Guardianship Orders from Outside the Province","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Enforcement; Law; Guardian; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.02161333911091996,"score_gpt":0.28321524241576934,"score_spread":0.2616019033048494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157332901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54418033,0.0037103288,0.0015796862,0.05513283,0.0021302297,0.0011911119,0.013663654,0.00037856324,0.3780333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6900488,0.003396749,0.001508984,0.01201165,0.00020082126,0.00022862857,0.005591738,0.000083960455,0.2869287],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538773,0.00021662637,0.000223297,0.00014489489,0.0028460962,0.0011813707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98463666,0.002328595,0.0010019891,0.0004218831,0.010188889,0.0014220685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023252931,0.00021915244,0.00018217455,0.0014263904,0.0056790477,0.0016592488,0.0012539302,0.0015367336,0.0060014674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012029749,0.00033929385,0.00017329874,0.0014481092,0.00087387586,0.00046196592,0.0010787962,0.0024593826,0.0007394609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002866972,0.0002491586,0.15755053,0.0004394123,0.000045921795,0.0051470725,0.04357091,0.00068353553,0.0038257989,0.020665964,0.67306685,0.0944682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022525503,0.00010651092,0.30110666,0.0002907888,0.00005204723,0.0005432733,0.050993256,0.0003652129,0.003237033,0.00042850606,0.6427669,0.00008728457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98170805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9869076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02246389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02246389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08345985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16298765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158089866","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x12000403","title":"What's Sincerity Got to Do with It? Freedom of Religion in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sincerity; Plaintiff; Law; Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Faith; State (computer science); Freedom of religion; Democracy; Sociology; Human rights; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.02053939208946261,"score_gpt":0.28723724704608883,"score_spread":0.26669785495662623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158089866","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10257973,0.018690005,0.0010191138,0.5977722,0.0027218205,0.00009233996,0.0009216559,0.00007681228,0.27612635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78049475,0.009513936,0.0014249817,0.124806516,0.0004623488,0.000037383386,0.00031011738,0.00007473899,0.08287513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993105,0.0004584194,0.00016553444,0.0006265737,0.002605068,0.003039354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99125797,0.0017877702,0.0002718831,0.00021728214,0.0034784146,0.0029866342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035803453,0.00031336717,0.0005720349,0.0012952423,0.02495633,0.013246891,0.0023310026,0.0063633686,0.0101574585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009473866,0.00040313476,0.0006910194,0.0019594717,0.013361628,0.0032312968,0.003227348,0.009610959,0.00043433125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006523664,0.000057221696,0.014153025,0.00021690932,0.0000768241,0.001275152,0.010883461,0.0006468877,0.00082474167,0.72321224,0.20722263,0.04136565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009208195,0.000057029643,0.03823819,0.0007710284,0.00010728328,0.0003406131,0.01866051,0.0012383196,0.000839807,0.057716645,0.8815211,0.00041731834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99677545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99845994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17528185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17528185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22615007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95655614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159087817","doi":"","title":"A Corner Turned: Supreme Court of Canada Decisions of the Year Past","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Assertion; Nova scotia; Heading (navigation); Political science; High Court; Articulation (sociology); Sociology; Engineering; Ethnology","score_opus":0.04762893357110932,"score_gpt":0.29714022181998734,"score_spread":0.24951128824887803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159087817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07031875,0.026965754,0.0013455447,0.39398187,0.0038679782,0.00012926947,0.0013931602,0.000087415225,0.50191027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6120654,0.011273524,0.0016871194,0.14857669,0.00063259824,0.00008270019,0.00050217326,0.000081883234,0.22509798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99177855,0.0007653274,0.00016443456,0.0007780149,0.0037752667,0.002738294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948716,0.0016828418,0.00019080382,0.00018159965,0.0021985245,0.00087462104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041948156,0.00037636783,0.00043410837,0.0017935315,0.029786404,0.013098666,0.0024640956,0.008875271,0.0049139764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011900671,0.00057124026,0.00067713513,0.0031304907,0.01024439,0.002569279,0.0020714998,0.011368947,0.000433073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040725565,0.000028636667,0.0033614957,0.00007881977,0.00003066306,0.0011237904,0.01104843,0.00027048463,0.00045683628,0.6665844,0.2970606,0.019915234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038075686,0.000027795786,0.014590539,0.0004569359,0.00007977373,0.00030434632,0.015284891,0.0004909335,0.00094916957,0.028252421,0.9393049,0.00022026274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9855664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10051138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10051138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13770923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7292645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161306650","doi":"10.25071/2564-4033.37274","title":"Reproductive Inequality in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Tomorrow Interdisciplinarity and Internationality","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Reproductive health; Inequality; Value (mathematics); Position (finance); Action (physics); Invocation; Health care; Law and economics; Order (exchange); Government (linguistics); Political science; Right to health; Sociology; Law; Business; Computer science; Computer security; Biology; Population","score_opus":0.04855518873427859,"score_gpt":0.36823004016016253,"score_spread":0.3196748514258839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161306650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.586458,0.016399547,0.00063259737,0.06306954,0.00083543995,0.00023655045,0.006530197,0.00007603876,0.32576206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9528816,0.004503721,0.00038092217,0.00491055,0.00009653962,0.00006506446,0.0008978599,0.000022991546,0.036240723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738735,0.00011945657,0.00005100479,0.00017693405,0.0005768172,0.0016884799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997973,0.00018419148,0.00012578772,0.00004850215,0.00060526794,0.0010631626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001081726,0.00019769275,0.0005737539,0.0026211017,0.013991123,0.0036914428,0.0012709099,0.001275927,0.014869019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002980867,0.0002151516,0.00045465404,0.005062582,0.0019181407,0.0008078511,0.0027840077,0.0020082213,0.00036995273],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020858056,0.00017190404,0.31721258,0.0003453824,0.00009792024,0.0025550793,0.021866463,0.0014776175,0.00046423211,0.41505206,0.11371323,0.12683494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007489749,0.00005402789,0.65817034,0.0005752624,0.000059275466,0.0005354957,0.019665647,0.0022469657,0.0002902474,0.011140325,0.30707204,0.000115577255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9970143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99873275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09678678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09678678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15871005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7022406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161800791","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0056","title":"Propositions and Propositional Acts","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Philosophy; Speech act; Epistemology","score_opus":0.029001187213141138,"score_gpt":0.28673428841779175,"score_spread":0.2577331012046506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161800791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08997408,0.020483848,0.15445824,0.027257726,0.0009413324,0.00017749105,0.0005702172,0.00032015887,0.7058169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9559581,0.004205603,0.02145953,0.0015801453,0.0004990932,0.00016989654,0.00027991628,0.00006955598,0.015778098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954692,0.003153685,0.00018354373,0.0004209447,0.00039495475,0.00037768055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953342,0.0033187345,0.0004246991,0.00041466876,0.00033004986,0.00017768792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033122543,0.0006770129,0.0004209294,0.0019035401,0.0034606648,0.005671105,0.0009481971,0.002422136,0.0070156245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059484406,0.00043106737,0.0006657946,0.0018631127,0.019354984,0.009669572,0.0028567472,0.0032259154,0.0008712083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004393971,0.0000024223477,0.00007487898,0.000013627479,0.0000019769757,0.000036991856,0.0012622268,0.00006864123,0.000021529084,0.9969048,0.0004366928,0.0011718429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074174104,0.000007719863,0.00027323377,0.000044093827,0.000005488358,0.00010351852,0.0012264281,0.0005670489,0.00008817045,0.9730558,0.024614042,0.0000070560145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036078533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001744565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070156245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033987034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012601592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024659395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163197924","doi":"","title":"From en ventre sa mere to Thawing an Heir: Posthumously Conceived Children and the Implications for Succession Law in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Ecological succession; Legislation; Law; Estate; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Warrant; Probate; Political science; Sociology; Common law; Business","score_opus":0.022319177134371253,"score_gpt":0.3173481726711056,"score_spread":0.29502899553673434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163197924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6723602,0.0069100056,0.0012043894,0.12118906,0.0003805319,0.00014030623,0.0002979637,0.000028506818,0.19748908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9652667,0.002139997,0.00064272905,0.012547133,0.00003870912,0.00002327335,0.000041950767,0.000011428805,0.019288208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481213,0.0005589462,0.00012830042,0.0003555809,0.0011923459,0.0029526933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99416554,0.0016881021,0.00058522855,0.00012640569,0.0015013354,0.0019334004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004169102,0.0002320605,0.00041933937,0.0010118488,0.03606136,0.00948673,0.002994927,0.00414814,0.005206233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009181644,0.00039121948,0.00037081743,0.0017771723,0.019324021,0.0020304509,0.005148413,0.0067933705,0.00017022378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007894328,0.000116504605,0.04872932,0.00015200498,0.000026587808,0.0034604014,0.12451475,0.000858258,0.0008346888,0.7599922,0.02975007,0.03148625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013342919,0.00018434689,0.13764504,0.0013979818,0.00013401236,0.0019208919,0.42656258,0.002716877,0.0019736513,0.06051749,0.36640447,0.00040925597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.993083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99796957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15221949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15221949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29577416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9833052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163206879","doi":"10.3138/cjls.27.2.239","title":"Creating Space for Indigenous Storytelling in Courts","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Negotiation; Storytelling; Active listening; Space (punctuation); Inclusion (mineral); State (computer science); Political science; Sociology; Law; Narrative; Gender studies; Communication; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02523413033028936,"score_gpt":0.286187942744622,"score_spread":0.26095381241433263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163206879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23434967,0.0019599968,0.045866504,0.029035483,0.0005433603,0.0002911942,0.00012351888,0.0005413441,0.68728894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97911924,0.00028644974,0.00789874,0.0006042959,0.00006614988,0.00009797729,0.000027995839,0.000055400105,0.011843676],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870346,0.009763757,0.00021777501,0.00054399774,0.0012755676,0.0011642431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854256,0.009180665,0.00084275723,0.0011619484,0.0013438958,0.002045158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009015865,0.0003962177,0.00033066428,0.0021737185,0.018600672,0.016443864,0.0027731154,0.0025584372,0.018395728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01888763,0.0003786249,0.00039802675,0.0010827963,0.020720087,0.007555292,0.023027426,0.002852982,0.0011001675],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050914397,0.0000907642,0.0022109924,0.0001750534,0.000013350237,0.0018396036,0.54962736,0.0009159603,0.0023444414,0.3792876,0.013493399,0.04995053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048210848,0.00008965117,0.0022425922,0.0005639594,0.000030026345,0.00076072686,0.3651713,0.002398133,0.0017177751,0.09839267,0.52848876,0.00009621873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029660089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06911371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9703399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066800597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010730423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06153983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163501159","doi":"10.21083/irss.v33i0.518","title":"The Moral Foundations of Constitutional Change in Canada and Scotland at the end of the twentieth century","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Scottish Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Literature; Economic history; Art","score_opus":0.07273860823133964,"score_gpt":0.3547221297209924,"score_spread":0.2819835214896527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163501159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2126233,0.06179057,0.0021785002,0.3098192,0.0019567918,0.000079060475,0.0004516316,0.00006921447,0.4110317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9613472,0.0057711746,0.00041963533,0.013681628,0.000299406,0.00002557725,0.000044796667,0.00003118981,0.018379278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869582,0.0024032213,0.00020352885,0.0006662164,0.004255441,0.0055133076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98700523,0.0045556244,0.0007465252,0.0004075236,0.0049930955,0.0022919148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009918182,0.00034909084,0.0008516869,0.0030418423,0.033929035,0.018026453,0.0027267518,0.007023821,0.004704908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023519406,0.00033044966,0.00050892675,0.00549977,0.062954366,0.004755735,0.0045033856,0.0069006416,0.00022551027],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036742393,0.000015867023,0.0018652157,0.000060951916,0.000011987352,0.00023964532,0.03399983,0.00021411556,0.00007424978,0.9326458,0.019154718,0.011680885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008241439,0.00004635849,0.03727305,0.00095220114,0.00007856053,0.0002922648,0.08561578,0.00063442584,0.00040709277,0.19764815,0.6767255,0.00024425308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98443455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9896819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8380279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1619721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2095636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97199357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165253649","doi":"10.7202/042523ar","title":"The Meaning and Implications of « Unlawfull » in Canada's Abortion Law","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.01095517750921776,"score_gpt":0.25194369119436727,"score_spread":0.2409885136851495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165253649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20586596,0.019000065,0.0039962353,0.18115571,0.000601496,0.000070282076,0.0005459912,0.00004597196,0.5887182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97075945,0.002936218,0.00057283,0.0075585367,0.00008308651,0.000018628749,0.00004596983,0.000018465244,0.018006794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940905,0.0015373948,0.0001422587,0.00042001667,0.0019395571,0.0018703449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924263,0.0035768182,0.0005894255,0.00028285128,0.002381791,0.000742976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034353097,0.00025431032,0.0002777533,0.0020964034,0.02330259,0.012865993,0.0016395218,0.0037886903,0.003759135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009473074,0.00031763627,0.00031603384,0.0031731834,0.039660294,0.0028001172,0.0034244596,0.0054437243,0.00015582092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000141575165,0.000005992806,0.002573289,0.000044174845,0.000005241005,0.00017637077,0.029455042,0.00017085721,0.00011183801,0.9544263,0.0059161605,0.007100618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042120635,0.00003814111,0.054646444,0.0012713575,0.00010344007,0.0003094751,0.123866014,0.0014776055,0.00080253434,0.2843638,0.53285915,0.00021981748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9814621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9894683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13566773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13566773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13258564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9843429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165483064","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwv015","title":"<i>Trinity Western University v Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Political science; Charter; Nova scotia; Jurisdiction; Constitutional court; Conscience; Sociology","score_opus":0.04513203442762357,"score_gpt":0.2976174407610646,"score_spread":0.252485406333441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165483064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056798805,0.0030720842,0.00046003913,0.07985642,0.0050810557,0.0008604479,0.003639348,0.000257411,0.8499744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13416032,0.00090397,0.0006786053,0.13134174,0.0004246146,0.00046761314,0.00093418156,0.00010766822,0.7309813],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960479,0.00023211825,0.00021677768,0.0003467545,0.0011559861,0.0020003293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99471927,0.0011475896,0.0002578533,0.00033693752,0.0020134188,0.0015249341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023770018,0.00041086657,0.00038236662,0.0013433147,0.019294439,0.0068180594,0.0020358292,0.008602915,0.023329617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066262,0.0010367067,0.0005723657,0.0014298673,0.0033803484,0.0015729481,0.002306715,0.008106783,0.0049056965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008222547,0.000060777347,0.005378093,0.00013475148,0.00001772832,0.0010016393,0.0052035796,0.000104435574,0.0015213876,0.102621906,0.8754761,0.008397406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049915663,0.000037939084,0.033395775,0.00035360467,0.00002843203,0.00019946053,0.005456537,0.00011750812,0.0011040577,0.0023137443,0.9568407,0.000102471386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9373936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98207295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062606394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025374873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08982147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18410844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168600337","doi":"10.1177/0002764210368096","title":"In the Name of Equality? The Missing Intersection in Canadian Feminists’ Legal Mobilization Against Multiculturalism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Behavioral Scientist","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Political science; Intersectionality; Law; Gender studies; Arbitration; Context (archaeology); Ethnic group; Economic Justice; Harassment; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.03400761167663148,"score_gpt":0.37136114749734805,"score_spread":0.3373535358207166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168600337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40566382,0.008516925,0.0022182493,0.13005218,0.00031424177,0.00006592024,0.00009163176,0.00004565365,0.45303133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822051,0.0013909721,0.0005272678,0.0032161246,0.00003292407,0.000015377022,0.00001592813,0.00002120188,0.012575149],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899671,0.0023077985,0.00012737079,0.0006920218,0.0026935139,0.0042122533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99553704,0.0015756759,0.00048188673,0.00021621589,0.0011237151,0.0010655092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059540067,0.0004650907,0.0005529249,0.0028722358,0.070570774,0.013240286,0.0023789057,0.0038556838,0.0050554345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007586268,0.00043159016,0.00048760118,0.003443642,0.060810678,0.004853786,0.010513473,0.0046282327,0.00019207213],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034492008,0.000025130616,0.0050378037,0.00010548667,0.000013870253,0.0005371789,0.591324,0.00016968045,0.0005308198,0.3664619,0.01041963,0.02534016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014475209,0.0000148882555,0.018546384,0.00035084222,0.000027716736,0.00020289519,0.6706663,0.00023013259,0.00054994883,0.029019922,0.28029737,0.00007911721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9862532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20948741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20948741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18137386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9168826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169696031","doi":"10.7202/039648ar","title":"The Roots of Canadian Law in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Legal history; Comparative law; Political science; Common law; Israeli law; Public law; Context (archaeology); Legal profession; Black letter law; Chinese law; Sociology; Sources of law; Private law; History","score_opus":0.021031489416687355,"score_gpt":0.2617595878260023,"score_spread":0.24072809840931492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169696031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065309964,0.022757817,0.0015449564,0.19750285,0.0012094659,0.00006079092,0.0004023784,0.00012165403,0.7110902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8531233,0.016645262,0.0017037339,0.021159131,0.00029153822,0.000046757275,0.00016790415,0.000109498054,0.10675295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99346584,0.00057373126,0.000098012504,0.0006321754,0.002314288,0.0029159186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932941,0.0011064579,0.00031462766,0.00015167591,0.0031329195,0.0020003195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027512554,0.00034019852,0.00047602577,0.003819912,0.041803345,0.013417034,0.0023783443,0.0031649002,0.011905942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008215842,0.0004606968,0.00038924228,0.007112126,0.023013247,0.003598171,0.0046791765,0.005914881,0.000522357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017144406,0.000017940642,0.0030559376,0.000081445396,0.000010209634,0.00035467706,0.024114527,0.000303676,0.00012312862,0.89502937,0.052777175,0.024114773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017032142,0.000012828256,0.0128453355,0.00043765278,0.000032544118,0.00014651482,0.027035246,0.00057561684,0.00018319646,0.048761383,0.9098546,0.00009809007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9978071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71636975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.28363025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37982765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8308874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170502526","doi":"10.1093/icon/moi004","title":"Canada: Supreme Court addresses gay-positive readers in public schools","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Gay rights; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.046754422815522216,"score_gpt":0.3251092374183937,"score_spread":0.2783548146028715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170502526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21409039,0.0041528787,0.00051150256,0.26148143,0.002103958,0.0003086278,0.0016426308,0.00018335377,0.5155252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5947259,0.0019004808,0.00064167904,0.1259342,0.00054146245,0.00013675947,0.00031023606,0.00011376576,0.2756955],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99054784,0.0005730748,0.00016566545,0.0005959177,0.0027567192,0.005360678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883652,0.0025489612,0.0003466853,0.00028219205,0.0042530685,0.004204014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003507973,0.0005184969,0.00070920284,0.0014223678,0.049756758,0.009895765,0.0044607734,0.018132165,0.014068534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009295777,0.00086447434,0.00061718625,0.0019341266,0.0071444022,0.0018572641,0.0036709479,0.014387649,0.0014479575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013637058,0.0002658167,0.03597249,0.00017234286,0.000053597727,0.0031892527,0.023436679,0.0005368626,0.0012854717,0.24185239,0.66643757,0.02666117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028023787,0.00011700081,0.096197195,0.00092151825,0.00034164306,0.00071363506,0.0535763,0.001376301,0.003258273,0.018081104,0.82485557,0.0002812314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9915883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090309426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.090309426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2355265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6552438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171778160","doi":"10.5539/ach.v2n1p71","title":"Culture, Government and Development in South Korea","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Culture and History","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Principal (computer security); Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.01753483815476341,"score_gpt":0.24180623221508338,"score_spread":0.22427139406031996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171778160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91059196,0.012542699,0.00017565278,0.009591762,0.00005342643,0.0000070876085,0.000026542879,0.000004796873,0.06700607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958191,0.0029520637,0.00006183699,0.00022826825,0.000004893143,0.0000025031395,0.000005361105,0.0000014097199,0.0009245275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996512,0.00017515534,0.000024183388,0.000029972916,0.00003204402,0.00008744759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948823,0.00015873603,0.00015746063,0.000019312056,0.00006018743,0.00011597803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006158899,0.00013748894,0.00010964609,0.0009363417,0.0022928012,0.0035703494,0.00017652972,0.00035106204,0.0019589532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007123693,0.00011069189,0.0000962789,0.0019439316,0.0038018438,0.001962047,0.001731205,0.00072264666,0.000060500694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065684806,0.00015753148,0.11406529,0.00053681154,0.00008097821,0.0023103561,0.151632,0.0013430038,0.0014833324,0.6388956,0.003578022,0.08585148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029802024,0.00015368714,0.31308863,0.0011056556,0.000085493455,0.0015710421,0.4555375,0.0010860591,0.0012700272,0.0813249,0.1446524,0.00009495591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019725332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043107852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019725332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003820304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029404215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03922099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173772894","doi":"","title":"Bringing Meaning to First Nations Consultation in the British Columbia Salmon Aquaculture Industry","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Law; Context (archaeology); Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Government (linguistics); Seriousness; Aquaculture; Supreme court; Sociology; Political science; History; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Archaeology; Ecology","score_opus":0.033863107061648266,"score_gpt":0.3246822346768829,"score_spread":0.29081912761523465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173772894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35931486,0.005180692,0.00087654137,0.11172255,0.00027125425,0.000047897345,0.000043291664,0.000036793648,0.5225061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.956231,0.0011549297,0.00033328962,0.011952076,0.000021217487,0.000028853607,0.0000110724695,0.000013345481,0.030254273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880932,0.0045324997,0.00020389294,0.00046934278,0.0021032558,0.004597806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98722535,0.0071124053,0.0006853574,0.000286316,0.0021911499,0.0024992642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057523893,0.00023566237,0.00031768804,0.0010908745,0.05279716,0.011490072,0.0013785633,0.007788686,0.0053028506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015491848,0.0004669188,0.00021779639,0.0016308118,0.025594499,0.0034728947,0.008795053,0.008176785,0.00043453317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005036451,0.00006215813,0.011629108,0.0001468235,0.000012891722,0.004946561,0.45223543,0.00047325355,0.0010198323,0.45788154,0.046694268,0.024847733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026447282,0.000056305034,0.033395626,0.00079362135,0.00003208418,0.001022758,0.57831895,0.0008488524,0.00059906254,0.038640745,0.34604383,0.0002215926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9354175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97700864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0715585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0715585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.106063746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5191957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177207741","doi":"","title":"Les aménagements consensuels que les couples appliquent à leur rupture sont-ils d'essence contractuelle?","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Toulouse Capitole Publications (University Toulouse 1 Capitole)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.03620319501603901,"score_gpt":0.28309090891488825,"score_spread":0.24688771389884923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177207741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65505373,0.014408672,0.018830629,0.085944586,0.0009281382,0.0001205167,0.0002051472,0.00010596097,0.22440262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801446,0.0022434252,0.00090618763,0.0017469907,0.00008776025,0.00003483891,0.000025929588,0.000021023408,0.014789151],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958645,0.0024783765,0.00009302858,0.00022863489,0.00064081035,0.00069456367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99615175,0.0013468987,0.0009116458,0.0002710239,0.0005847202,0.000733915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003729831,0.00032355983,0.0003967707,0.00077289384,0.010366376,0.0058757854,0.0011892007,0.0025471966,0.00657016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010137223,0.00024239294,0.0003215383,0.0009522508,0.019150212,0.0051997495,0.0045681517,0.0031065694,0.0007853972],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060110575,0.00005726549,0.010881169,0.0001192521,0.000022426579,0.0017312458,0.7513165,0.00014003106,0.0008645937,0.19397298,0.006355534,0.034478903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013328561,0.000073953095,0.0135800615,0.00037707807,0.000014744734,0.0023053815,0.76744044,0.00020388338,0.0005721586,0.02670151,0.18863514,0.000082274826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028532378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038761213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028532378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043187663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044905115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056732595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177371912","doi":"10.18224/educ.v18i1.4268","title":"MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION IN CANADA AND THE CASE OF THE PORTUGUESE AND BRAZILIAN COMMUNITIES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Portuguese; Multiculturalism; Scholarship; Christian ministry; Library science; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Diversity (politics); Gender studies; Social science; Political science; Pedagogy; Anthropology; Law","score_opus":0.025800624813341305,"score_gpt":0.2694191812309472,"score_spread":0.2436185564176059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177371912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92582184,0.0029449612,0.0003304743,0.00744068,0.000069674796,0.00010458996,0.000045997534,0.000007667558,0.06323415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949602,0.00094511104,0.00021122645,0.00035230166,0.000007730153,0.000020462023,0.000012345541,0.000003456861,0.0034871632],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942439,0.0019211826,0.00014140313,0.00036708504,0.0010129068,0.0023135263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927214,0.0025504967,0.0006154263,0.00027390785,0.0014654276,0.0023733622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043559046,0.00040908283,0.00050071994,0.0019644557,0.04085896,0.0062229168,0.0015474897,0.0017991448,0.0030470137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009593736,0.00039829264,0.00027350907,0.0054312637,0.011293599,0.0019900193,0.009008528,0.0023316527,0.00011182485],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034460634,0.00006289363,0.011031185,0.00013730841,0.000010425525,0.0029195573,0.9359533,0.000112057605,0.00023193753,0.028678533,0.00148173,0.019346522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072818357,0.00001610998,0.012128932,0.00023527327,0.000009580487,0.00049856066,0.9386629,0.00012962503,0.00011992496,0.0015324388,0.04664027,0.000019209618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9348358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9706594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06516421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046402737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.086317405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.336677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177674306","doi":"10.7202/1068942ar","title":"LE MARIAGE POLYGAME ET LE DROIT INTERNATIONAL PRIVÉ QUÉBÉCOIS DANS UNE PERSPECTIVE DE DROIT COMPARÉ","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021864869775289668,"score_gpt":0.2876897324820975,"score_spread":0.26582486270680783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177674306","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36029235,0.008411212,0.0014745048,0.04963465,0.00031231824,0.000036086596,0.00025293868,0.000018079705,0.57956785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9099377,0.0021784687,0.00029965217,0.0034851711,0.000054291857,0.00002250381,0.00005424264,0.000015203363,0.0839527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991042,0.00019889195,0.000011774191,0.000093562834,0.0001629235,0.00042855987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993668,0.00010489195,0.00007059602,0.000033033804,0.00018644256,0.00023816526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006715923,0.00029250677,0.00025640312,0.001017886,0.011839774,0.0052842856,0.00075399387,0.001573187,0.009658355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012703296,0.00014352964,0.00022694771,0.0012826639,0.010167297,0.0022160627,0.0023499394,0.0026191655,0.0003568286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032161508,0.000023515146,0.013447717,0.00005223844,0.000025838603,0.0007290008,0.07631502,0.00026117277,0.0002717638,0.8828098,0.012426725,0.013605084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021064378,0.000041956133,0.09818329,0.00070405233,0.000076903474,0.0004474433,0.2090649,0.00083186314,0.00037240636,0.04018494,0.64997196,0.00009923863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94717693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97325087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052823067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034477446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02654871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25015253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178083431","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwv043","title":"<i>Mouvement laïque québécois v Saguenay (City)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Tribunal; Conscience; Charter; Political science; Human rights; Neutrality; Duty; Constitution; Statutory law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03963257883280171,"score_gpt":0.2987751175640989,"score_spread":0.2591425387312972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178083431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016571922,0.008275715,0.00087534916,0.11737789,0.008101589,0.0007322069,0.004279781,0.00027864956,0.84350693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.079512745,0.002283578,0.0010383955,0.26590347,0.0009812681,0.0005133562,0.0011948964,0.00013920593,0.6484331],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966878,0.00025482298,0.00012783035,0.00040912113,0.00090394047,0.0016164165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814975,0.00048812828,0.00008243349,0.00011244652,0.00075624423,0.00041093628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022760828,0.00075864326,0.000609237,0.0013859115,0.014290528,0.008075998,0.002179067,0.014668292,0.02488566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004994975,0.00092630985,0.0012478052,0.0013550009,0.0029593178,0.0019303068,0.0019158325,0.010469753,0.0040884423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069328984,0.000051063707,0.0030464241,0.0001080557,0.000033962897,0.0008486928,0.0010867795,0.00016250624,0.0005083163,0.090609625,0.8939069,0.009568441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055020228,0.000018921359,0.0088467235,0.00019252523,0.000027318256,0.00016908985,0.0007927062,0.00012491422,0.00030863305,0.002274102,0.9871329,0.000057200148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95591336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9809444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044086635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032878477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07795012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23855114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180101268","doi":"","title":"They are Agreements Nonetheless, Case Comment on Miglin v. Miglin, 2003 SCC 24","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Certainty; Test (biology); Context (archaeology); Autonomy; Meaning (existential); Child support; Political science; Balancing test; Wife; Psychology","score_opus":0.02671061214872403,"score_gpt":0.30435490995860603,"score_spread":0.277644297809882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180101268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028259544,0.011213067,0.0013684961,0.44509906,0.0040592486,0.000216336,0.0010614011,0.00021234924,0.5085105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15410283,0.002685383,0.0012103772,0.57936555,0.0009378625,0.0001950064,0.00030416535,0.00009513973,0.26110375],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958223,0.00045977082,0.00010996255,0.00062751654,0.0013772161,0.0016032932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850756,0.0004242145,0.000085516076,0.00008233967,0.00063664466,0.0002637411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022150488,0.0005867078,0.00046449853,0.0010206705,0.026229488,0.007161205,0.0032824401,0.019235905,0.007280739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069333864,0.00074143836,0.0009004145,0.0017475338,0.005626337,0.0026489862,0.0021908164,0.013472933,0.001532153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004340708,0.000030522642,0.0023618361,0.00005588264,0.000013302754,0.0014277482,0.0072626392,0.00016455473,0.0005955857,0.2916893,0.6865527,0.009802547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018469946,0.000022549902,0.0049418597,0.00016248353,0.00002388851,0.0003859922,0.0043104137,0.00016739001,0.00044976748,0.010584669,0.9788715,0.000061030823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86204624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94203883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13795376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03339348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041365486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27753234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180803877","doi":"10.29173/alr285","title":"Personal Stare Decisis, HIV Non-Disclosure, and the Decision in Mabior","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Point (geometry); Sexual assault; Criminal law; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics","score_opus":0.038995556658975375,"score_gpt":0.33670745195185725,"score_spread":0.2977118952928819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180803877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18080877,0.052541506,0.0027600252,0.28029323,0.0015506645,0.00008055447,0.000054270142,0.0000313178,0.48187968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90364,0.005866231,0.0008646904,0.06589709,0.0005566476,0.00003468585,0.000017123693,0.000009570721,0.023114093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892988,0.0055466737,0.0004373186,0.0009234288,0.0021016714,0.0016920684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99090075,0.0063612647,0.0007766124,0.00040792424,0.00085931394,0.00069409714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013692833,0.000135744,0.000316868,0.0006037836,0.006976063,0.0055548693,0.0010984851,0.0067556174,0.0019239874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02364429,0.000267942,0.00035492392,0.00058899407,0.010899114,0.0025219591,0.0034948424,0.007516036,0.00020232014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036173526,0.000030736723,0.002378853,0.00006452043,0.000012599778,0.0009874238,0.00690538,0.00020601103,0.00021535688,0.9526977,0.015448059,0.021017194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101818856,0.0002535249,0.013281177,0.0011983381,0.00007639332,0.0024818138,0.014497033,0.0009382968,0.002044024,0.34949234,0.61549544,0.00013972324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049819294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08523309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9501807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00635206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009628944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09905863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181142208","doi":"","title":"La contractualisation du mariage: réflexions sur les fonctions du \"Code civil du Québec\" dans la familie","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Droit prospectif: Revue de la recherche juridique","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.07575588040631019,"score_gpt":0.32643920898978956,"score_spread":0.25068332858347936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181142208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59503037,0.007050482,0.004994587,0.12706952,0.00064802694,0.0000955941,0.00034452966,0.000045804652,0.26472107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97321045,0.00055764924,0.00069259934,0.0023594066,0.00003354698,0.000047809503,0.000028329003,0.000019140834,0.02305103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893806,0.0047381986,0.00025604293,0.0007506799,0.0022500579,0.0026244011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856312,0.0066838376,0.001186847,0.00068807876,0.004231171,0.0015788892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0107981125,0.00039209315,0.000499022,0.0024051596,0.026466398,0.008234435,0.002440347,0.004385315,0.008954743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02416516,0.00049157214,0.00039022608,0.0030828742,0.023449792,0.0041862293,0.0048210253,0.005178715,0.0003206319],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005484109,0.000031738862,0.017522236,0.000097096265,0.000024291485,0.00048749076,0.30379203,0.00023543056,0.00041828884,0.6428963,0.01649689,0.017943416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040149695,0.000056038094,0.11691222,0.0011814235,0.00006707291,0.0004799923,0.523988,0.00093843153,0.0007608254,0.0327285,0.3227029,0.00014446152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96022815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9741106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07123619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07123619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09773479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51685715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181419258","doi":"","title":"THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF NORTH VANCOUVER BYLAW 7217 A bylaw to amend the District of North Vancouver Zoning Bylaw, 1965 (Bylaw 3210) pursuant to section 903 of the Local Government Act (RSBC 1996, c.323) (Text Amendment - definition of dwelling unit)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Zoning; Corporation; Government (linguistics); Section (typography); Public administration; Local government; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.028642223814799295,"score_gpt":0.2561527571228544,"score_spread":0.2275105333080551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181419258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008261031,0.0028414007,0.0009834886,0.009077762,0.0013282225,0.00047556474,0.0046522263,0.000401896,0.97197837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014236672,0.00062200485,0.0005495894,0.0015123088,0.000052230884,0.000085152475,0.0010893234,0.00008652081,0.9817662],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702233,0.0001369997,0.00010283414,0.0003628693,0.0016307356,0.00074426876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954359,0.00033864297,0.00013320809,0.00024748867,0.003135057,0.0007096643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011908596,0.0005111517,0.00042750934,0.0013869083,0.009192747,0.0076507083,0.0012271315,0.0033511177,0.088607155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049709124,0.0008645782,0.00023085884,0.001418593,0.0010485387,0.0010774632,0.0014214186,0.003939473,0.023877712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000515923,0.000034590295,0.0020271444,0.00011568505,0.0000068249456,0.0001763078,0.00051592157,0.00013032323,0.00058877486,0.06378791,0.89792657,0.034638368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008983898,0.0000072074554,0.0027922338,0.000059387785,0.0000043668097,0.000029165265,0.00028350193,0.00009251208,0.00019324396,0.00073764584,0.9957808,0.00001107243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85825497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92720395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14174503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014015898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04312396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2964205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184817944","doi":"10.1016/s1701-2163(16)35266-5","title":"Elective Caesarean Section for the Mature Nullipara?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Caesarean section; Section (typography); Elective caesarean section; Obstetrics; Gynecology; General surgery; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.021269637142155594,"score_gpt":0.26556625768777564,"score_spread":0.24429662054562004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184817944","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062010605,0.005946365,0.00019763137,0.904004,0.007729328,0.00008881825,0.00017379507,0.000023409542,0.01982616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34655553,0.013440428,0.0011916774,0.5822644,0.033729155,0.00014659022,0.00020685057,0.00004037984,0.022424908],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995679,0.00007495732,0.00003980946,0.00004135496,0.000070427704,0.00020558972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983516,0.00042333372,0.00017250261,0.000035837627,0.00009993897,0.0009168856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092969445,0.0002543438,0.00042782468,0.00032921828,0.0020422505,0.00077629846,0.00094678835,0.014469534,0.0066684703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059293546,0.00031749243,0.00051580643,0.00027650513,0.0009114884,0.0010208922,0.0008945594,0.007333396,0.0009296108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001314092,0.0007392508,0.14912416,0.000509703,0.00009501437,0.33414453,0.003797258,0.0006621617,0.005295475,0.014119062,0.41486552,0.07533379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087485893,0.0018753982,0.2004729,0.0033840716,0.00019669165,0.3481338,0.026884606,0.0023691477,0.001609642,0.017689502,0.39622602,0.0002834235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014159561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046919692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014469534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001749677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053247223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028154314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184855128","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1435","title":"Reflections on the Twentieth Anniversary of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: a Symposium","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.047955632946409796,"score_gpt":0.2918563974828959,"score_spread":0.24390076453648607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184855128","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023343882,0.045910373,0.00014805871,0.9076787,0.012210104,0.000027280235,0.00016215382,0.000017211993,0.031511705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13742784,0.08086996,0.0009538116,0.58120865,0.016210677,0.00009696731,0.00025128198,0.00017822809,0.18280266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874817,0.0018160408,0.00022582476,0.00081723044,0.0054685306,0.0041906815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864248,0.0037817976,0.0003624898,0.0002951634,0.004961606,0.0041741007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015365666,0.0008955503,0.0008962085,0.002381812,0.03616863,0.017821174,0.0037877075,0.023534518,0.01117802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016452366,0.0009884174,0.0010075306,0.0033050522,0.024737589,0.0063318135,0.0044876114,0.019246684,0.0011291982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033561828,0.000028504039,0.00041508867,0.00010116254,0.000008905652,0.00024266313,0.00643012,0.0001021476,0.00019485499,0.058387205,0.92171687,0.012338903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011358115,0.000008022878,0.002064792,0.0003160123,0.000008409533,0.00004112392,0.005104175,0.000047662834,0.0000820816,0.0039367974,0.9883329,0.00004682545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9711076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15077281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15077281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23043062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98498315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184953878","doi":"10.22215/etd/2000-04590","title":"The many meanings of mediation; a sociological study of mediation in Canada.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative mediation; Mediation; Party-directed mediation; Conciliation; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Transformative learning; Epistemology; Alternative dispute resolution; Social science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.022480221560921713,"score_gpt":0.31313934177456065,"score_spread":0.29065912021363893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184953878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31960326,0.014739691,0.009992301,0.08999674,0.0005509039,0.00049531844,0.00029558627,0.00007626928,0.56424993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752127,0.0031679876,0.0015496968,0.0015030721,0.000019195017,0.000106290674,0.0000300782,0.000037877424,0.018373026],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924015,0.003959933,0.00013874464,0.00046318962,0.0014148038,0.0016217781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99417526,0.0031351831,0.00038789862,0.00022762624,0.000748444,0.0013255915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007370122,0.0004832181,0.00057656755,0.0024490978,0.080498636,0.014492216,0.00226281,0.0033425621,0.005114188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012156695,0.00053250714,0.00034942877,0.005668104,0.050734684,0.008698432,0.007444968,0.0063449494,0.00033281077],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013351073,0.00002780133,0.0020320732,0.00006659532,0.0000040051577,0.0006031625,0.6514305,0.00011139309,0.00006916488,0.32774776,0.0060521546,0.011842042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009792669,0.000013085919,0.0053117136,0.00037092876,0.000011092115,0.00023548532,0.7146316,0.000491252,0.000116740455,0.05800326,0.220766,0.00003908261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91802937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9308027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1199674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1199674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13341698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8704285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2186105750","doi":"10.4000/revdh.1481","title":"L’interprétation harmonieuse de la charte québécoise et du code civil du Québec : un sujet de discorde pour le tribunal des droits de la personne et les tribunaux de droit commun ?","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue des droits de l’homme","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Hôtel-Dieu de Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.03733881900205871,"score_gpt":0.3051268356421939,"score_spread":0.2677880166401352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2186105750","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20423949,0.010118131,0.024116047,0.14044467,0.002074939,0.00009937902,0.0009859188,0.00014866024,0.61777276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93782645,0.001692158,0.002438744,0.005023062,0.0001305472,0.00004936293,0.00015634531,0.00007695596,0.052606415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958252,0.0015405477,0.00008937352,0.000497719,0.0011762362,0.0008710385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947137,0.0011166509,0.0003267343,0.00040902442,0.0028424335,0.00059138134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030984534,0.0004316994,0.00046318825,0.0016988695,0.012144429,0.009623431,0.0015155417,0.0021083902,0.008242492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007158294,0.00026247595,0.000353221,0.0026201808,0.021641204,0.0038073726,0.002427018,0.0044312063,0.0005126802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043291777,0.000013095925,0.005569504,0.0000914601,0.000023136427,0.00027953312,0.084321685,0.0003864076,0.0005710105,0.8508792,0.030785602,0.027036032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033718734,0.000045977107,0.05996605,0.0008241443,0.000059565857,0.00024293346,0.1339533,0.0017894136,0.000783575,0.091106266,0.7109981,0.00019687305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96476173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97758305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06987425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06987425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.066709384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50697553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187801251","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1452","title":"The Empire of the Lone Mother: Parental Rights, Child Welfare Law, and State Restructuring","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Supreme court; State of exception; Welfare state; Politics; Citizenship; Political science","score_opus":0.01345010629204034,"score_gpt":0.26666975772709073,"score_spread":0.2532196514350504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187801251","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18289994,0.009718711,0.003371276,0.11350346,0.0002142232,0.000027409875,0.000051484854,0.000024249966,0.6901892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848006,0.0012926877,0.00019794142,0.0032824725,0.000036330293,0.000010766872,0.0000064509036,0.000008141675,0.010364611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979107,0.0006943128,0.00003499516,0.00015637412,0.00037884444,0.0008247473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837923,0.0011013314,0.00013096638,0.00007462568,0.000175226,0.00013868128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026955917,0.00016910894,0.00024225708,0.0008935304,0.018046798,0.009347695,0.0009197083,0.0023778195,0.0023994297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004198556,0.00023151108,0.00017521784,0.0010004262,0.050317273,0.0033951649,0.003863371,0.004270211,0.00010395627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026050786,0.0000033691363,0.00052135997,0.0000055798273,8.9895525e-7,0.00008698685,0.025763862,0.000047471156,0.000027445914,0.9699812,0.0012098895,0.0023494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032905955,0.000027959779,0.0115344245,0.00047668375,0.00003513808,0.00029112858,0.15365247,0.00064219726,0.00075814733,0.49980554,0.33268976,0.00005369094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.783455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8653855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.783455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037947137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029966582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4356405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W218798039","doi":"","title":"Les Trente Premières Années De La Charte Canadienne En Droit De La Famille (The First 30 Years of the Canadian Charter in Family Law)","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Spouse; Charter; Family law; Ethnology; French; Marriage law; Sociology; Jurisprudence; Law; Art","score_opus":0.010092879570029387,"score_gpt":0.25197959812156406,"score_spread":0.24188671855153468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W218798039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050935384,0.02917723,0.00644929,0.05910547,0.005956239,0.00039353434,0.0028118638,0.00023210845,0.8449389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41506356,0.011110057,0.0042031268,0.011843063,0.0005928153,0.00019291272,0.0005641713,0.00013940103,0.556291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967835,0.00028587924,0.00006854693,0.0002988051,0.0014005561,0.0011626597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997399,0.0004951555,0.00013518584,0.00012309631,0.0013792551,0.00046832903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018215143,0.0005508665,0.0003211382,0.0022760795,0.011241078,0.0061987243,0.0011766371,0.002828897,0.0074762944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004760915,0.00036375737,0.00050235086,0.0026291958,0.010041366,0.0013200421,0.0012916409,0.0038043677,0.00067530107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025787807,0.000019733503,0.0019399506,0.00012181604,0.0000091303145,0.00031038187,0.021587716,0.0005243782,0.0003963943,0.80626154,0.1406784,0.028124798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005196998,0.000009839209,0.007851325,0.00017054242,0.0000065101026,0.000059004862,0.0030429566,0.00014290956,0.00025230052,0.0059728357,0.9824421,0.00004451772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9883465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09802039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09802039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11557869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71119106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W219044165","doi":"","title":"The Windsor Report and Ecumenical Dialogue","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Prayer; Baptism; Sociology; Eucharist; Law; Common ground; Theology; Religious studies; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.046166345065645716,"score_gpt":0.35998941963346487,"score_spread":0.31382307456781916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W219044165","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1130559,0.014607933,0.00058337906,0.122308806,0.003264012,0.00004357728,0.00037754362,0.000063958745,0.7456949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7482813,0.0071953847,0.0004552385,0.018530995,0.000998067,0.00011038163,0.00026498555,0.00012479926,0.22403885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99252933,0.0033586372,0.0003634355,0.0006489882,0.0015907234,0.0015088456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953492,0.0022394469,0.00066816097,0.00031997915,0.000961291,0.0004619152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004726895,0.00033682995,0.00023204942,0.0018715344,0.014576331,0.008787279,0.0013912448,0.0042984267,0.010513498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012468921,0.0003644519,0.0001593954,0.0027128262,0.01047677,0.0054301564,0.004506833,0.0031873416,0.0009037748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065259155,0.000034494995,0.004347488,0.00013666136,0.000010014433,0.0023688264,0.20415801,0.000080944854,0.0002733069,0.46516475,0.29318506,0.030175244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003184874,0.00000669921,0.0035304348,0.000192338,0.0000019857691,0.00015660234,0.05666012,0.000022795688,0.00006927873,0.0035815863,0.9357569,0.000018046569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16115417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20549172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16115417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015009474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007384169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32043225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2191619616","doi":"10.1515/9781773855714-065","title":"7.4 Re Constitution of Canada, 1981: The Patriation Reference","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.04183571701639508,"score_gpt":0.23355973715111192,"score_spread":0.19172402013471684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2191619616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031834315,0.012964243,0.0008115504,0.030014532,0.0011965194,0.000074763564,0.0005486765,0.000065965396,0.9511402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.056320053,0.0043702563,0.0010062433,0.020458492,0.00024003886,0.00009946425,0.00024385378,0.000092665185,0.917169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728954,0.00024038168,0.0000584327,0.00020992474,0.0011759432,0.0010258002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897254,0.00013762829,0.00002846772,0.000054349453,0.0007073713,0.00009968652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011353672,0.0008081059,0.00040018873,0.0019456168,0.015440955,0.008215674,0.0017846633,0.008353289,0.02253606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032778739,0.0004948515,0.0006053143,0.0025228302,0.006894863,0.0024047205,0.0020230464,0.0070115696,0.0039704423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009366902,0.0000119230945,0.00026323745,0.000045350338,0.000003394376,0.000119190765,0.0027246661,0.00013973711,0.00012312156,0.7661923,0.22001427,0.010353395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051569277,0.0000036629735,0.0012834993,0.00016451423,0.00000557949,0.00004675795,0.0013164107,0.000076488424,0.00021037798,0.022834202,0.9740327,0.000020680876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.953722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98196733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052268285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052268285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07887726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37923467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2194368223","doi":"","title":"The Legal Status of Aboriginal Customary Adoption Across Canada: Comparisons, Contrasts and Convergences","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Statute; Mainstream; Openness to experience; Common law; Political science; Law; Statutory interpretation; Business; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.009950373810732082,"score_gpt":0.31443381041637575,"score_spread":0.30448343660564364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2194368223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9544874,0.005550063,0.00027426347,0.0022458192,0.0000260235,0.00003157317,0.00044365053,0.00002203297,0.036919136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972705,0.0011831082,0.00016516434,0.00008230686,0.000004723946,0.0000061503792,0.00012256006,0.000008790508,0.0011565862],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99431556,0.00047186756,0.00024961613,0.0005768016,0.0022244162,0.0021617964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9802786,0.0031757888,0.0017900784,0.0006586954,0.012025363,0.0020714975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045855828,0.00024981634,0.0007022206,0.014512866,0.011142543,0.0064216857,0.002266425,0.0006237027,0.003343091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014846809,0.0003225398,0.0004072566,0.019371409,0.008727401,0.0017465933,0.004136403,0.0015016611,0.00012656784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032731763,0.000106782674,0.40598148,0.0005988452,0.000202224,0.0011293218,0.36889607,0.0006766873,0.0019719873,0.08752533,0.0038600394,0.12872387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059330705,0.00003209248,0.87062556,0.0003881345,0.00006510927,0.00021496501,0.11074504,0.00037829857,0.00033729748,0.001689584,0.0154498825,0.000068119625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9938101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10444423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10444423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09172265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75779945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2195831491","doi":"","title":"Equality's Nemesis?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Judaism; Law; Multiculturalism; Islam; State (computer science); Jurisdiction; Gender equality; Sociology; Gender studies; History","score_opus":0.018416918188181038,"score_gpt":0.31010250471822415,"score_spread":0.2916855865300431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2195831491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03299969,0.008962636,0.005789475,0.35790274,0.0050719776,0.00004296785,0.000064155705,0.000036551195,0.5891298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8774221,0.002375862,0.0013577398,0.053874366,0.0019900855,0.000083279985,0.000034855228,0.000039358565,0.06282237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906166,0.004609658,0.00024532256,0.001303446,0.0017558694,0.0014691447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967553,0.0015421109,0.00032021306,0.00042065448,0.00048959296,0.00047216858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007831794,0.00029382994,0.00062551536,0.00065112486,0.006826696,0.0065126987,0.0012081434,0.0045121117,0.009709366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013225629,0.00019333333,0.00044296778,0.0005634505,0.051681723,0.0135939745,0.007034668,0.009691208,0.0009509456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067168944,0.0000070401575,0.00016468874,0.000012461657,0.0000015649025,0.000046813893,0.0038124504,0.000012135543,0.000043802618,0.9885592,0.003441517,0.0038916338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021124335,0.000030372486,0.00089783606,0.00020176994,0.0000056434665,0.00017673783,0.014512219,0.0001116887,0.00026457763,0.71855396,0.26520732,0.000016767364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009949769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006451418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009949769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005995957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056158253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04350394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W219669053","doi":"","title":"Eagle soaring on the emergent winds of indigenous legal authority","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Law; Environmental ethics; Economic Justice; Indigenous rights; Political science; Colonialism; Sociology; Order (exchange); Human rights; Law and economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.052145942076425984,"score_gpt":0.2883170905806425,"score_spread":0.2361711485042165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W219669053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26726156,0.009601382,0.012147419,0.07385673,0.0005357192,0.00004385453,0.000047616395,0.00008333444,0.63642246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771731,0.0014396514,0.0021058067,0.0009847035,0.00008487178,0.000010663946,0.0000060941,0.000020204756,0.018174877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715036,0.0011628115,0.00006608528,0.00036479734,0.00072588335,0.00053004606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980782,0.00091248646,0.0001589987,0.0002492428,0.00035089368,0.0002502214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004132898,0.0001383307,0.00028089975,0.0011843342,0.007820116,0.006583014,0.0006310425,0.0013288928,0.0031270715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045215264,0.00019080826,0.00022958244,0.00091358076,0.03946705,0.006042732,0.0048215855,0.0033097505,0.00021999849],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006075962,0.000004033938,0.000375864,0.000023062663,0.0000020315488,0.00015351851,0.07214681,0.00010590054,0.0001481473,0.9191031,0.0013496957,0.0065818136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012782365,0.000036610025,0.0033041034,0.00028474798,0.0000107551805,0.00030820986,0.093136854,0.00083031727,0.00037649355,0.56101424,0.34065217,0.00003267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.067085095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.089441165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067085095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007548967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006248278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13338923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201471634","doi":"","title":"Book Review of Robert Post, et al 'Prejudicial Appearances: The Logic of American Antidiscrimination Law'","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Scholarship; Law; Constitutional law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.014494216401388758,"score_gpt":0.3225856280090041,"score_spread":0.30809141160761533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201471634","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013962618,0.6539819,0.00020726692,0.253356,0.037998717,0.000024167923,0.00026499768,0.000020481086,0.054006852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032741942,0.63501465,0.0002792841,0.17646916,0.04377216,0.00006350896,0.00027554404,0.000065082524,0.1407864],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868363,0.00024630185,0.000055615114,0.00014024277,0.00079198234,0.00008229577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948415,0.0026840628,0.00020020404,0.00010432948,0.0018452466,0.00032469435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001804018,0.00066234736,0.0010426526,0.0031938185,0.0024571188,0.0042149136,0.0019172773,0.0051367157,0.021516327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008303051,0.0005371466,0.0004281948,0.0055103293,0.0034526098,0.0039817556,0.0012479252,0.006022574,0.010836885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018590249,0.000003693599,0.00002587686,0.00010036993,0.000001320584,0.000010381434,0.00004732209,0.000014447943,0.000006446987,0.0026061616,0.98430216,0.012879879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026426378,0.0000018198457,0.0002207752,0.00041076206,0.0000022169909,0.000047359157,0.000057018602,0.000008563413,0.000005354821,0.00093751017,0.998302,0.000004018746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12313153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27595922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12313153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008535021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009595471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2448296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203824065","doi":"","title":"Indigenous peoples: Negotiating constitutional reconciliation and legitimacy in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Indigenous; Political science; Law; Negotiation; Duty; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04505518199907934,"score_gpt":0.283898263497561,"score_spread":0.23884308149848163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203824065","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25801355,0.006068772,0.004775827,0.052013766,0.00023495362,0.00018810078,0.00012614959,0.00008160847,0.6784972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805588,0.0014273066,0.0012251426,0.0016824006,0.00002736635,0.000031585616,0.000024167652,0.000018008,0.015005115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877808,0.0022864193,0.00032496738,0.00084549445,0.004682108,0.004080193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98963064,0.004812394,0.0005612469,0.00043787184,0.003343386,0.0012145146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010014899,0.0002670784,0.00056929875,0.003017786,0.02848045,0.012707229,0.0031664483,0.004253583,0.0059099817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025703432,0.00041547295,0.00034858598,0.0035081315,0.021943353,0.0030945954,0.008308809,0.005436954,0.00022771065],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023683011,0.000023062958,0.0035693366,0.00007768057,0.000027055105,0.00084973045,0.04679474,0.0008674928,0.0003288166,0.91877824,0.007960121,0.02069996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014345592,0.000049729853,0.020117782,0.0007753202,0.00020760145,0.00045836734,0.10043365,0.0050774687,0.001497969,0.2797352,0.5912386,0.00026488185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9831861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98980147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13342611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13342611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27653962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96807873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203871222","doi":"","title":"One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Gladue at Ten and in the Courts of Appeal","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Seriousness; Jurisprudence; Appeal; Law; Contempt; Political science; Imprisonment; Remorse; Economic Justice; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01494542493726116,"score_gpt":0.2912098980369692,"score_spread":0.27626447309970803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203871222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05119272,0.022340128,0.024779646,0.4302831,0.0039632516,0.00009064329,0.00011391952,0.00027142063,0.46696523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8158144,0.0051738815,0.008873117,0.08598759,0.0010785608,0.00009964916,0.000045372963,0.0002451534,0.08268238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821409,0.007201253,0.00046227887,0.0015178008,0.004673671,0.0040041083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990553,0.004803954,0.00033098063,0.0008848029,0.0016604497,0.00176675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015668906,0.00047686006,0.0009169461,0.002845072,0.019636622,0.024580808,0.0029989078,0.013921768,0.006693764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025128225,0.00068105425,0.0011099365,0.0020940865,0.073607765,0.02753554,0.015380491,0.036074914,0.0011845761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002140575,0.000015450838,0.00043261118,0.000033876553,0.0000056069375,0.000246808,0.0133005995,0.00009616521,0.00009838573,0.9648077,0.0087092845,0.012232071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017444694,0.000042060503,0.0006018638,0.00079470605,0.000014744418,0.00034648002,0.023953773,0.0003676985,0.00030812836,0.70140874,0.27205035,0.00009399813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14081492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20733626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9736232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026376804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033945296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27999055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2206309149","doi":"","title":"Adding Social Condition to the Canadian Human Rights Act","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Charter; Political science; Disadvantage; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Cultural rights; Social equality; Social rights; Politics; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.017705740660332023,"score_gpt":0.3214602232510862,"score_spread":0.30375448259075416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2206309149","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012533584,0.022335662,0.0055389805,0.26328108,0.0076314937,0.00043576994,0.0012758519,0.00015419173,0.6868133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53466964,0.028683167,0.02689462,0.25397897,0.003293677,0.000753869,0.001649719,0.00020645287,0.14986992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95366627,0.007848572,0.0020552927,0.0022842032,0.026608033,0.0075375186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95769244,0.012046454,0.0014672695,0.0024238755,0.023638116,0.0027318238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019497512,0.0006863362,0.00078963,0.006873644,0.018226704,0.012105927,0.0027777255,0.008042518,0.0063308715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04386451,0.0006185878,0.0009033581,0.005435299,0.023662554,0.005591648,0.006185699,0.009733511,0.00087124784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017427992,0.000014494797,0.0012982585,0.0002251648,0.000013739858,0.00016127831,0.006884047,0.00023821299,0.00021976185,0.86476374,0.09823837,0.027925428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002441326,0.000020277035,0.007375194,0.0011010134,0.00004738085,0.000077975055,0.003487297,0.00023970731,0.00020778066,0.034245364,0.9530646,0.000108979955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9715263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9802557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10060195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10060195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31417048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72992164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209263739","doi":"","title":"Introduction: Sexual Assault in Canada: Law, Legal Practice and Women's Activism Ottawa","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sexual assault; Criminology; Law reform; Legal practice; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.00928521447640944,"score_gpt":0.26954985699903505,"score_spread":0.2602646425226256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209263739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014474247,0.21926273,0.0010006096,0.072793804,0.03558439,0.0005407921,0.04499983,0.0006392478,0.6107043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04942889,0.15855925,0.0015062392,0.012357717,0.004792795,0.00027009178,0.0117570795,0.00062927476,0.7606987],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782133,0.00012689934,0.00009458142,0.00021640821,0.0012772847,0.000463552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956103,0.00050736876,0.00014591138,0.00014391607,0.0028735986,0.000718924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010357364,0.0014153604,0.0010451737,0.008293853,0.01804224,0.013531838,0.002393477,0.0018567046,0.07358408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003517477,0.00065841316,0.000720996,0.016955981,0.0041863485,0.002358765,0.002547307,0.002051259,0.006411113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019331988,0.000020620168,0.001464303,0.00044894326,0.000008243077,0.000068370595,0.0039036034,0.0002107992,0.00013244573,0.008393938,0.9481417,0.03718767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021789397,0.0000057520633,0.008076896,0.0005242171,0.00000801534,0.000031403986,0.0034135033,0.000030627933,0.000041911393,0.00035551257,0.9874814,0.000028440216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9929101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99794286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12297182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12297182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20398259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8922272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2213666015","doi":"10.1017/s0008197315000471","title":"“THE CHOICE IS CRUEL”: ASSISTED SUICIDE AND CHARTER RIGHTS IN CANADA","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science","score_opus":0.053430002113746246,"score_gpt":0.3076852628311166,"score_spread":0.2542552607173703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2213666015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30620468,0.012300365,0.0013300307,0.28856668,0.0009740221,0.000114356335,0.0006765432,0.000038622897,0.3897947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9504628,0.0037335588,0.00041023293,0.020473015,0.000116347204,0.000033569664,0.00010906777,0.000028404962,0.024632962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946615,0.0006455682,0.000095252915,0.00041800155,0.0013176361,0.0028621806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99366874,0.0015049253,0.0003553333,0.00016937226,0.0018612222,0.0024403248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031150556,0.00030100756,0.00047640802,0.0016743483,0.033616178,0.010907934,0.002843637,0.0068939226,0.009014408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012570333,0.00044232703,0.0005728959,0.0036882102,0.019662127,0.0039978717,0.0055997167,0.011664413,0.00028212415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009067257,0.00009916449,0.019391874,0.00006956192,0.000031542662,0.0010428941,0.038000274,0.0006990454,0.00015028255,0.8582203,0.058542978,0.023661498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034401746,0.000094698495,0.11591327,0.0011662958,0.0002008543,0.0008331302,0.146706,0.0039937524,0.0006118205,0.17019376,0.5593813,0.00056106865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9979796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99900323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1683796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1683796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3149643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96456176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215096919","doi":"","title":"The Relevance of Relevance to Equality Rights","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Argument (complex analysis); Legislature; Statute; Allocative efficiency; Law and economics; Jurisprudence; Political science; Statutory law; Legislation; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.014965449909921614,"score_gpt":0.3081549449228731,"score_spread":0.2931894950129515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215096919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019711016,0.002856605,0.009362513,0.047123335,0.0004943449,0.00008431619,0.00008185418,0.000055206598,0.9202308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9435545,0.0010266618,0.0027194144,0.012205855,0.0009281567,0.00014271056,0.000045868965,0.00007343029,0.039303407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9648547,0.011968149,0.0010334103,0.0049347486,0.01051841,0.0066905515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837885,0.00835509,0.0009395027,0.0023126393,0.003761223,0.0008431202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01466404,0.0005108962,0.0010876221,0.002414385,0.015736157,0.017994685,0.0027037684,0.010716316,0.010506498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03784913,0.0008979517,0.0014045126,0.002055522,0.08325523,0.0147555135,0.011710783,0.013066997,0.0011078977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035420433,0.0000028778984,0.00009270017,0.000011976648,0.000002258929,0.00003417978,0.0010714427,0.000041851912,0.000034732442,0.9965216,0.0008652047,0.0013176412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022317025,0.000011466235,0.0008953624,0.0000993741,0.000017229873,0.000077308825,0.0009985366,0.00020811507,0.00017673853,0.9423477,0.055122465,0.000023296325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15645324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1305671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15645324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04153764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028942373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31108516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215275648","doi":"","title":"Magie, Contes Et Sortilèges - Le Droit À L'Écoute De L'Enfant (Magic, Spells and Tales - The Right to Hear from the Child)","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"MAGIC (telescope); Autonomy; Representation (politics); Humanities; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Art; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.011234768825875662,"score_gpt":0.27677171034094533,"score_spread":0.2655369415150697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215275648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06450061,0.054032058,0.002083527,0.09397109,0.0025385579,0.000051496598,0.0005824812,0.00015041583,0.7820898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45548722,0.009854667,0.0013967087,0.00906161,0.00027559433,0.00003937706,0.00010645809,0.00010163825,0.5236767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946254,0.00017225687,0.000010154083,0.000057223555,0.00013045606,0.0001673719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996092,0.00012633832,0.000042249078,0.000023601111,0.000087189605,0.000111365975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008375631,0.0003822828,0.00018372553,0.00056223036,0.007571033,0.0037922196,0.0004071782,0.0017780741,0.016257666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017940745,0.00018457993,0.00015642084,0.0004409708,0.0049893404,0.0024089655,0.0020220398,0.0021510546,0.0020566923],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005482526,0.00002574244,0.005357608,0.00011159038,0.000006680224,0.0011185606,0.12985961,0.00007297132,0.00077521004,0.4994698,0.28443733,0.07871014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018751252,0.000006698976,0.0031989764,0.000085010906,0.0000015383623,0.00031134687,0.0146173695,0.000014308248,0.00018328187,0.0036830353,0.9778895,0.000006906821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43105537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63790864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43105537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065876404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049773506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8570927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215380626","doi":"","title":"Kapp Gives Affirmative Action Wide Margins","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Supreme court; Charter; Government (linguistics); Fishing; Political science; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Action (physics); Business; Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.03203046212272898,"score_gpt":0.31157309211852646,"score_spread":0.2795426299957975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215380626","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053071654,0.0019229585,0.015319793,0.07753914,0.004986001,0.00022568244,0.00036413103,0.0007101064,0.8936251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32006657,0.0014440059,0.00886153,0.2904382,0.0030275777,0.0008288572,0.00022243042,0.00042064767,0.37469015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97307986,0.0057472237,0.0011718064,0.004505918,0.010813729,0.004681358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98337746,0.007954193,0.0004274683,0.0027136502,0.004637779,0.0008894963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017270159,0.0011796177,0.0010437901,0.0011906963,0.01419655,0.0128437625,0.0024548045,0.029708553,0.024989258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039792653,0.0014889863,0.0014661513,0.0007855956,0.0095056575,0.007684331,0.011241788,0.025835775,0.0097849155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043571617,0.000044249748,0.00017723125,0.0000644914,0.000021059028,0.00026819602,0.001987746,0.00026332788,0.0004992098,0.8263885,0.15499496,0.015247624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006588065,0.000065534565,0.0005012744,0.00021138825,0.000053798278,0.00019352195,0.0006869958,0.00040011853,0.0011977742,0.14110138,0.8553836,0.0001387875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058207005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06430101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058207005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061038365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018025849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115736425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2219596490","doi":"","title":"Should Australia enter into the Anglican communion covenant?: Reflections to assist consideration within the Anglican Church of Australia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"St. Mark's Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bishops; Covenant; Consecration; Windsor; Law; Eucharist; Commission; Theology; History; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2064120776751366,"score_gpt":0.4601322354243249,"score_spread":0.2537201577491883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2219596490","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07990556,0.66359586,0.0005131733,0.2308763,0.002724241,0.00012113898,0.000036887388,0.000008393921,0.02221852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47362658,0.46067116,0.0018212606,0.050930444,0.00083891075,0.00017928373,0.000033977667,0.000017099142,0.011881319],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99331576,0.0052273693,0.0003176749,0.00016350318,0.00058070687,0.0003949635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911805,0.0052092643,0.00082554296,0.0002088777,0.0018773661,0.0006984144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014709051,0.00017648932,0.00058339303,0.0009153054,0.0037089174,0.004577724,0.001124443,0.0030342024,0.0015106171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014796079,0.00027373055,0.00022194059,0.002201289,0.003620273,0.0043678507,0.0027931507,0.0028489733,0.00019924827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113298775,0.000124929,0.006283071,0.010873234,0.00010141847,0.0033470904,0.6150357,0.00017041771,0.0012994725,0.09334727,0.05639852,0.21290562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016167416,0.00010158279,0.01703792,0.012258804,0.000068643036,0.000997802,0.25605807,0.000055922217,0.00035217855,0.0037859299,0.7092259,0.000041078558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09782121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24764048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09782121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069715553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027566805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19450366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W221999019","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Realism About Constitutional Protection: Indigenous Rights Under a Judicialized and a Politicized Constitution","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Politics; Constitution; Political science; Jurisdiction; Law; Realism; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Indigenous rights; Human rights; Shadow (psychology); Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Sociology; Political economy; Geography","score_opus":0.016896738508027365,"score_gpt":0.2865102730648243,"score_spread":0.26961353455679693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W221999019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13795097,0.0033733451,0.017125526,0.041880917,0.00040902267,0.000086811815,0.00010000368,0.000029719979,0.79904366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936308,0.0005228309,0.001140027,0.0011555258,0.00016695976,0.00004078529,0.00002305061,0.000011141679,0.0033088094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.973598,0.015129686,0.00044898954,0.0019386961,0.0060382723,0.0028463553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800938,0.014960843,0.0015146213,0.001559015,0.0012324546,0.00063922745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021181712,0.0002711983,0.00071892195,0.0022011234,0.006822488,0.011968183,0.0012174364,0.0036808688,0.0065418496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043453697,0.00028375103,0.00073642784,0.002056656,0.0572161,0.009761523,0.005772406,0.006428776,0.00028939723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008568657,0.0000041194817,0.00012958754,0.00000984644,0.0000028478214,0.000013225304,0.0009427241,0.00018414574,0.00007102965,0.9974617,0.00012425453,0.0010480317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006132861,0.00006652696,0.0029913106,0.00014062351,0.000036671663,0.000059841474,0.003899868,0.0011628802,0.0003662055,0.9623572,0.028828967,0.000028549026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019298783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01619145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021181712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0124087585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0122577865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11202097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220234893","doi":"","title":"The B:C: Health Services and Support Decision-The Constitutionalization of a Right to Bargain Collectively in Canada: Where Did It Come From and Where Will It Lead?.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.02759220643750637,"score_gpt":0.35200784229778487,"score_spread":0.3244156358602785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220234893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11902636,0.0036693332,0.0037316089,0.30877617,0.0010103792,0.0004674631,0.0031617424,0.000112275906,0.5600447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8258939,0.0008829998,0.0023924229,0.06371033,0.00021170499,0.00017296779,0.00026475798,0.000049653223,0.10642136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855811,0.0018815667,0.000382456,0.0011554878,0.0033590891,0.0076403897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99068683,0.0027004841,0.0003210143,0.00031992508,0.002791361,0.0031803977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072933882,0.00042685805,0.00053661794,0.0011835655,0.022133373,0.011238195,0.0027948231,0.014001276,0.015937801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018101059,0.00063135714,0.0007046178,0.0016171541,0.0102308225,0.002940424,0.0035099604,0.009079497,0.00084000523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010622949,0.0000601335,0.0068921344,0.000077655284,0.00003393816,0.00027903524,0.005598218,0.0005490421,0.00046707332,0.86830753,0.10530054,0.012328431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044757573,0.00015404788,0.06792104,0.0008239014,0.00030984206,0.0002967358,0.02368404,0.005048705,0.0021974246,0.16871667,0.72996247,0.00043756617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9933061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088243715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.088243715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26521719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6402559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220663304","doi":"","title":"(Mis)Placed Justice: Justice, Care and Reforming the ‘Best-Interests-of-the-Child’ Principle in Canadian Child Custody and Access Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Legalism (Western philosophy); Family law; Best interests; Objectivity (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Subjectivity; Political science","score_opus":0.011842202406651054,"score_gpt":0.3080139409486175,"score_spread":0.29617173854196643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220663304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05233469,0.012264805,0.009206243,0.25112265,0.0015099446,0.0000774787,0.00010839378,0.000046625144,0.67332906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92122525,0.0035560096,0.0037699223,0.029241497,0.00023456228,0.00004988397,0.00003535243,0.000054725777,0.04183282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99191004,0.002532188,0.00015575968,0.00059656857,0.0026638107,0.002141645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996382,0.0016479741,0.0001640062,0.00016823158,0.0011398103,0.0004979287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007675566,0.00032813783,0.00045504037,0.0012184584,0.023476854,0.01150783,0.0017947091,0.0051596155,0.0037060906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011640908,0.0002639201,0.00033268417,0.0022615758,0.05672077,0.005057296,0.0041547283,0.007340126,0.00023805663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032357066,0.000004296642,0.00024998715,0.000013139866,0.000001209523,0.00006315652,0.02273462,0.00008246186,0.00003553612,0.9644118,0.007910422,0.0044901776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017315684,0.000022060522,0.004106105,0.00044938637,0.000020739028,0.00020319528,0.054597456,0.0008577127,0.00033030674,0.4258539,0.513458,0.00008385539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9439192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9515782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0799196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0799196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10285116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2221207432","doi":"","title":"The Fetishism of Formal Law and the Fate of Constitutional Patriotism in Communities of Comfort: A Canadian Perspective","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Politics; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Patriotism; Ideology; Democracy; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010504829812757563,"score_gpt":0.26785567966148577,"score_spread":0.2573508498487282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2221207432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16531673,0.0047085234,0.0040418617,0.04875142,0.00017553581,0.00008282107,0.00009541978,0.00004557816,0.7767821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808959,0.0007815935,0.000656242,0.001012482,0.000018907684,0.00001348628,0.000012392277,0.000021755657,0.016587215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956103,0.0013781313,0.00006245688,0.00043254282,0.0008677342,0.0016488845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966941,0.0011034695,0.0002435336,0.00022647025,0.0009728964,0.00075951597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034313856,0.00038702352,0.0005865878,0.0027116798,0.042360924,0.013897471,0.0022603848,0.0043133916,0.010769267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069227763,0.00038203908,0.00045159724,0.002833858,0.056014203,0.006688684,0.006451616,0.004934685,0.00035862208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013653023,0.000009374971,0.0005456737,0.000021696296,0.0000028660766,0.0001382206,0.025355736,0.00022054247,0.00007708565,0.9682928,0.0016135455,0.0037089523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053905387,0.000039079834,0.0076795807,0.00037084814,0.000038183105,0.00027693962,0.12500145,0.0027909665,0.00038766308,0.57200605,0.291222,0.00013341088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9588199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9714779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15291187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15291187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.072244555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98250216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2223919524","doi":"10.32597/dmin/73/","title":"Developing and Implementing a Framework to Address Theological Fragmentation at Bethel Seventh-day Adventist Church in Toronto","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gospel; Theology; Seventh day adventist; Faith; Christian ministry; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03923875637816529,"score_gpt":0.3998714355613911,"score_spread":0.36063267918322583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2223919524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26139885,0.011057233,0.17784497,0.17046364,0.0022408292,0.0069422107,0.0011120124,0.00032217416,0.36861816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8170754,0.003819164,0.13243715,0.0031460123,0.00011208106,0.0027120358,0.0004377916,0.00012177625,0.040138613],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98782593,0.008035268,0.00042183802,0.0009829283,0.0010334633,0.0017005593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890142,0.004615305,0.00065389223,0.00061567844,0.0021177172,0.0029832018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020065084,0.0009254431,0.0005407497,0.0038586282,0.024845263,0.014098733,0.0046910574,0.003311148,0.004523072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009615754,0.0006986434,0.00059204036,0.0038958646,0.040125847,0.006812234,0.011761593,0.005559626,0.00038286962],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019647257,0.000056361376,0.0035654285,0.00043420133,0.000011142543,0.0012470313,0.572412,0.0010646165,0.00046302818,0.3853703,0.010270658,0.025085445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017781733,0.0000576981,0.007061335,0.0012403735,0.00002373204,0.00029232306,0.79119116,0.0015000642,0.00042520973,0.029802538,0.16834016,0.000047688878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5973895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80839765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40261048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.122366965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15052792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8878386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2227791887","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1448","title":"Book Review: Indigenous Difference and the Constitution of Canada, by Patrick Macklem","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Indigenous; Political science; Law; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.013604364801770331,"score_gpt":0.2411782373089223,"score_spread":0.22757387250715197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2227791887","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024639885,0.901334,0.00014886013,0.04323884,0.013728367,0.000029263083,0.0005384379,0.00003209517,0.040703807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005708467,0.8458247,0.00037193007,0.02267395,0.007814609,0.000060396032,0.00087245955,0.000072263356,0.1166012],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990295,0.000074359465,0.00003084162,0.00008694165,0.0006460835,0.00013226471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790835,0.0003881214,0.00008145155,0.00004606276,0.0013748851,0.00020108376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006820802,0.0010346683,0.0010922899,0.0038210496,0.0042377603,0.0045944154,0.0023521998,0.0024080938,0.021803413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045993114,0.00047398554,0.0003634194,0.012432148,0.0035778827,0.0027072667,0.001080234,0.00266356,0.003782885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049689625,0.0000034984498,0.00007125599,0.00034148968,0.0000045077154,0.000021953258,0.00009177835,0.00006186607,0.00002155459,0.0033869068,0.976699,0.019291187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032503701,0.0000019577103,0.0006730792,0.00061729504,0.0000046380314,0.000044504242,0.00013791144,0.00001534648,0.000011336794,0.0006760526,0.9978071,0.0000074759687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87395316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94599867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12604684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031232597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06398039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25357825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2227803424","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Affirmative Consent in Canadian Sexual Assault Law: Neoliberal Sexual Subjects and Risky Women","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Akron law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medicine","score_opus":0.06517423869699798,"score_gpt":0.32904369513481146,"score_spread":0.26386945643781345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2227803424","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0730002,0.05362831,0.0033296603,0.67643553,0.0028678211,0.00023916681,0.00033372405,0.000053571308,0.1901121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8237259,0.024109576,0.0027776218,0.11979195,0.0014708613,0.00018326605,0.00013710438,0.000073560106,0.027730074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9561329,0.012256994,0.0017690894,0.002898653,0.01587647,0.01106585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.841877,0.11386607,0.003454176,0.0038981952,0.032204952,0.004699583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07667503,0.00062669866,0.0011435323,0.006725314,0.029225823,0.023089372,0.0063242693,0.024664644,0.005685427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1331359,0.0009435388,0.00091098656,0.008863924,0.060291473,0.011459081,0.0056882044,0.020129522,0.0003482133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054014254,0.000048058362,0.0034378553,0.0003351206,0.000026881227,0.00027071696,0.0383653,0.00039869433,0.00023427863,0.8488921,0.06342897,0.04450811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015848574,0.000069193804,0.033272527,0.0035408884,0.00033870578,0.00026976646,0.0763858,0.0013992103,0.0012489944,0.2569106,0.62598443,0.00042140318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9708166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9859293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13603304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13603304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34940705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98699343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229390123","doi":"10.7202/1100416ar","title":"THE RIGHT TO MANAGE EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS: A CANADIAN FIRST NATIONS PERSPECTIVE","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Political science; Public administration; Computer science","score_opus":0.0235781175789077,"score_gpt":0.3185383233534232,"score_spread":0.2949602057745155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2229390123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011492817,0.05525677,0.0020471013,0.36392644,0.0014605353,0.000051804207,0.00070242555,0.00003730932,0.5650248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71241444,0.07405327,0.0041495203,0.066509195,0.0008098772,0.00010103707,0.0004254947,0.000057899764,0.14147937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99149233,0.0009800387,0.00015752381,0.00052557135,0.0033055444,0.0035389748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949875,0.0008741675,0.00028466043,0.00016422677,0.002130848,0.0015586604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003374192,0.0006160875,0.00048550605,0.0041013546,0.01758156,0.012743316,0.0021607575,0.0069245673,0.0075637023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068156933,0.0003378718,0.0004994941,0.0048134765,0.016486071,0.0056129047,0.0032420796,0.006928073,0.00040288348],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066303187,0.000010153683,0.0007808492,0.00005555523,0.0000056107665,0.00012337415,0.002843995,0.00026315046,0.000053694548,0.93168575,0.05541563,0.008755527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020618329,0.000016284377,0.010639974,0.0013818968,0.00003415825,0.00022253508,0.011280101,0.0006445048,0.00018106197,0.11190356,0.8635576,0.0001177009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9913646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8620868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13791323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1983275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230851777","doi":"","title":"Same-Sex Marriage in Canada: The Missing Debate about the Best Interests of Children","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Best interests; Parliament; Family law; Political science; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.015264024578930458,"score_gpt":0.28619721058328257,"score_spread":0.2709331860043521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230851777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6383241,0.028105233,0.0005775574,0.17711847,0.0003122895,0.000053310214,0.00051337626,0.000019873094,0.15497585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97635216,0.006950728,0.00026586305,0.008761508,0.000047002326,0.000010129953,0.000047043042,0.000009378455,0.0075561446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932811,0.0011224267,0.00013699944,0.00036434163,0.0025901892,0.0025049255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99388206,0.0024074423,0.0005775181,0.00012416451,0.0015172076,0.0014915788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046675634,0.0001922539,0.00047508566,0.0012038517,0.028476756,0.007097648,0.001592196,0.0030163743,0.0036010544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010474244,0.00030557025,0.00022999302,0.0032727427,0.016694829,0.0025180182,0.0030161478,0.0058208625,0.00014855972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008753857,0.000052050993,0.046034347,0.0002766033,0.00003145431,0.0018468294,0.33956975,0.00031526765,0.0005319129,0.5113731,0.03256933,0.067311816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037527654,0.00007149561,0.121172085,0.001388469,0.000074151496,0.00081496476,0.45653546,0.00048323165,0.0008513101,0.023732001,0.39464688,0.00019251632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99277765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99733233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12161331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12161331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.168475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8823705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2231645727","doi":"","title":"La Protection Constitutionnelle De La Pluralité Juridique: Le Cas De 'L'Adoption Coutumière' Autochtone au Québec (Constitutional Protection of Legal Plurality: The Case of Aboriginal 'Customary Adoption' in Québec)","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.016249604514355056,"score_gpt":0.2992783153374138,"score_spread":0.28302871082305875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2231645727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69268566,0.0011679397,0.003006868,0.012818846,0.00008585789,0.000113882605,0.00018385776,0.00002584302,0.2899112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97678375,0.00012710788,0.0003524275,0.00045516196,0.000012667145,0.000019676729,0.000014672594,0.0000047700128,0.022229742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652135,0.000801968,0.00006212575,0.00041170057,0.0006047859,0.0015980401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967204,0.0012169955,0.00029376982,0.00029598724,0.0010957493,0.00037715182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034097089,0.00020323253,0.00029932227,0.00059529586,0.015191188,0.0046674255,0.0010855895,0.0026107521,0.00874533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036957436,0.0002793643,0.00034489264,0.0009286914,0.011034938,0.0012137827,0.0020590306,0.0036965706,0.0002871775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059476813,0.000035789813,0.013999744,0.00006517166,0.000020598298,0.0019874151,0.07395869,0.0007664225,0.0019308317,0.8881785,0.005477372,0.013519875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017881661,0.00018529904,0.22426774,0.0006388968,0.00015067765,0.0013656861,0.12976673,0.00436156,0.003037073,0.08413788,0.55161697,0.00029277758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9458876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9700978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054112375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046406537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04444354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33670455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232551521","doi":"","title":"The Separation of Church and Date: Destabilizing Traditional Religion-Based Legal Norms on Sexuality","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Homosexuality; Sexual orientation; Principal (computer security); Economic Justice; Political science; Lesbian; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.041262571169334974,"score_gpt":0.3189040255911061,"score_spread":0.27764145442177113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2232551521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4324488,0.0025765547,0.0031805537,0.11659146,0.0005658007,0.0000543457,0.000079891994,0.000025584182,0.44447693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98000574,0.0003157131,0.0001906973,0.009656041,0.000102482576,0.00001556066,0.000009911561,0.000009654631,0.009694185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99225813,0.0029774639,0.00021692445,0.00056956755,0.0017726332,0.0022052089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938412,0.0032783886,0.0006240219,0.0004736512,0.00067437935,0.0011084386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068959016,0.00016925817,0.00036962065,0.0007011406,0.015473087,0.008774915,0.0015900916,0.0061198804,0.0030767778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015251507,0.00042474532,0.00031615375,0.0007373671,0.03738837,0.0046256455,0.006461359,0.011227985,0.00022651254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048158185,0.000019563427,0.003036856,0.000021679887,0.000005145227,0.0006166082,0.041512433,0.000104712235,0.00037068134,0.9437734,0.0051531023,0.0053376406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003244857,0.00014898369,0.0234875,0.00091694586,0.000096301235,0.00089790113,0.15436232,0.0010713473,0.002876088,0.2673904,0.5482331,0.00019461002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37320375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6207258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37320375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026682744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01900999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7420629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232803041","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2686329","title":"No to Rawlsian Public Reason and Yes to the Enlarged Mentality: An Affirmative Role for Moral and Religious Arguments in Canadian Public Discourse in Light of Charter Values","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public reason; Charter; Political science; Law; Public discourse; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02522894134180369,"score_gpt":0.30157200532990996,"score_spread":0.27634306398810626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2232803041","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08407119,0.0020789206,0.004868334,0.32630867,0.001159081,0.00006286321,0.00029210033,0.000104909355,0.5810539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9429248,0.0006218325,0.0013603421,0.017105639,0.00031203032,0.000034796667,0.000050666964,0.000103351136,0.0374865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897664,0.0026739764,0.00023780398,0.001191648,0.0034499667,0.002680235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97791344,0.009950099,0.0013381252,0.0017249462,0.0070964694,0.0019768581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010601529,0.0006005401,0.00067709066,0.003298479,0.028080788,0.018092731,0.0027939954,0.009335248,0.022240825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037450694,0.0004669658,0.0008011918,0.003628442,0.0660272,0.012397087,0.0052652583,0.013641506,0.0011220184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035248802,0.000012461457,0.0008338253,0.00005016525,0.000011757194,0.00008745871,0.071510226,0.00007911536,0.00016186839,0.9023342,0.020330798,0.0045529115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008335898,0.000020532609,0.008076868,0.00040110806,0.0000992867,0.00018048556,0.17459673,0.0008074111,0.00065052457,0.37105653,0.44379595,0.00023118856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90193266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9119566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09806734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06794694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06458826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49299186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232811628","doi":"10.71781/21626","title":"Analyse du contrat amoureux au sein du mariage par correspondance : une étude de cas des unions entre Philippines et Canadiens","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.053551924291320066,"score_gpt":0.36041312142226145,"score_spread":0.3068611971309414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2232811628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97817457,0.0011474235,0.00041837912,0.0014837526,0.000038682287,0.0000393585,0.000066172455,0.000009633247,0.01862203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863885,0.00081322616,0.00019737861,0.00028995212,0.00001995422,0.00008032675,0.000057186946,0.000015689873,0.012137715],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699533,0.001315023,0.00009428222,0.00033714276,0.00055816147,0.00070008263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932561,0.0026547795,0.0017592278,0.00024730165,0.0010796697,0.0010029243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034008797,0.00046309247,0.00052543683,0.0020266648,0.012868689,0.005062522,0.0018952127,0.0013635806,0.013036918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008579525,0.0005444016,0.00021655108,0.005818528,0.007694514,0.0032758259,0.007730654,0.0021078074,0.0008590279],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027586375,0.000025439194,0.024917075,0.00013272258,0.000010298999,0.0012023447,0.96050227,0.00004515077,0.00023960133,0.005605932,0.0007657469,0.0065258136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019039439,0.000020207732,0.024853501,0.000097319375,0.000008654555,0.0001773671,0.9547239,0.000046725705,0.00012203825,0.0002621176,0.019675396,0.000010860555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14479552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22099517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85520446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008350967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007271102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28790545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234284482","doi":"","title":"Constitutional conflicts and aboriginal rights: hunting, fishing and gathering rights in Canada, New Zealand and the United States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"ResearchSpace (University of Auckland)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Jurisdiction; Indigenous; Sovereignty; Doctrine; Fundamental rights; Justiciability; Treaty; Judicial review; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.014823982723765453,"score_gpt":0.28274927934325755,"score_spread":0.2679252966194921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234284482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6383604,0.01130656,0.0014178365,0.027030185,0.00018783826,0.00013949467,0.0002300499,0.000024869025,0.3213028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806846,0.0023944513,0.00062873407,0.0010355065,0.00002672941,0.00002805306,0.00003965733,0.000007978258,0.015154347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99682814,0.00035886437,0.00010996587,0.00026689528,0.0011368851,0.0012992864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99625313,0.0012370636,0.0003863384,0.00011136847,0.0013461631,0.00066595245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002343974,0.00025552727,0.0003249333,0.002470413,0.01878675,0.010910156,0.0019169187,0.002249498,0.0032126904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007119372,0.0003713975,0.00030451952,0.0033664717,0.03086836,0.0023369119,0.0031409631,0.0036331564,0.00010178434],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031902342,0.000039037048,0.013101107,0.000101541016,0.00002127068,0.0012370193,0.08832927,0.0008829132,0.0006393845,0.87030756,0.0056785545,0.019630512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009164833,0.000067300425,0.1890069,0.0011754245,0.00018623493,0.00080705347,0.28865245,0.0042874143,0.0015258779,0.13288075,0.38093096,0.0003879724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9952231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14101964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14101964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13978282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99629545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2235439053","doi":"","title":"In the Back Alleys of Health Care: Abortion, Equality and Community in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Dignity; Constitutionality; Charter; Decriminalization; Health care; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Sociology","score_opus":0.03786929357513867,"score_gpt":0.3291906930467411,"score_spread":0.2913213994716024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2235439053","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036013577,0.032686733,0.0019012025,0.53577965,0.002625285,0.00010436052,0.00024178157,0.00005082421,0.39059657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77231073,0.017969325,0.0023739627,0.1068863,0.00071370165,0.0000827458,0.000107170315,0.000073532785,0.0994826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930496,0.0012247267,0.00012502329,0.0004410694,0.0024243575,0.0027352674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99593437,0.0014005739,0.00017346439,0.000114528164,0.0009604711,0.0014165173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034475257,0.00032592457,0.0005066318,0.0012756553,0.04267764,0.014943526,0.0023670155,0.00802929,0.0070370133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009455814,0.00042027343,0.00034961835,0.0027541877,0.028964559,0.0037068406,0.006722808,0.008526374,0.00027649855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016044016,0.000018848612,0.0018959407,0.00007381128,0.000008329085,0.00039218902,0.018219396,0.0002906007,0.00010758709,0.8892565,0.07134707,0.018373584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004707603,0.000025529607,0.010046953,0.0006234084,0.00004932481,0.00023296362,0.055997416,0.0010099304,0.0003315596,0.17025729,0.76123494,0.00014357278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99792814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16261767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16261767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32731533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9712448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2235938801","doi":"","title":"Parliamentary Privilege, the Canadian Constitution and the Courts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Privilege (computing); Political science; Legislature; Supreme court; Dignity; Parliament; Charter; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01571575026570412,"score_gpt":0.2595442909476894,"score_spread":0.24382854068198526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2235938801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039091054,0.02090528,0.0014863343,0.057585616,0.0005802354,0.00004260901,0.00040787962,0.000049162736,0.87985176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8845781,0.010763778,0.0016958768,0.008951912,0.00027743963,0.000040968735,0.00019695041,0.000047142767,0.09344788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591285,0.0005636937,0.000079071164,0.00035684445,0.001458417,0.0016291601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99742883,0.00069282297,0.00017219875,0.00012064882,0.0009991843,0.00058635056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019285758,0.00033102036,0.0003373451,0.0025520676,0.018079469,0.010430065,0.001358055,0.0028735076,0.00898452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006389171,0.00035608202,0.00027490826,0.0037897127,0.020524256,0.0033124718,0.002698801,0.003000559,0.0005245526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009259834,0.0000041076237,0.00068175583,0.000025340207,0.0000034876646,0.00009312976,0.0022528109,0.00014468223,0.00007066044,0.97842777,0.010892838,0.0073942277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033199383,0.000015899263,0.020833371,0.00043537488,0.000041792813,0.00015192069,0.008340639,0.00073662197,0.00025473224,0.21254238,0.7565033,0.00011074844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9905612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11474153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11474153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14429002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83251196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W223843697","doi":"","title":"Equipping the Saints: Ordination in Anglicanism Today. Papers from the Sixth International Anglican Liturgical Consultation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bishops; Baptism; Theology; Liturgy; Eucharist; Context (archaeology); Ecclesiology; Sociology; Divinity; Law; Classics; Philosophy; History; Political science","score_opus":0.03917722114592433,"score_gpt":0.356190711901244,"score_spread":0.3170134907553197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W223843697","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010268485,0.46081734,0.000734679,0.29790905,0.014991625,0.00006402367,0.00023411628,0.00009596483,0.21488473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18913537,0.16750509,0.002033549,0.039976377,0.005695776,0.00015782187,0.0005405979,0.0002917269,0.59466374],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735594,0.0011618556,0.00011947513,0.00014983768,0.00050456834,0.00070830534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872607,0.0003068639,0.00010584622,0.000046724595,0.00028109478,0.000533355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028748002,0.0006659082,0.00054497604,0.0011789472,0.011216646,0.007538874,0.0009165058,0.003396835,0.02398495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028994484,0.00074453076,0.00020312906,0.0027768984,0.0056248647,0.004485032,0.004694218,0.007178316,0.0040120515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038426602,0.000034317247,0.00049850845,0.0004036881,0.000003510418,0.00024379208,0.031660244,0.000039611627,0.00019930278,0.026935942,0.86902636,0.070916176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000317476,0.000006514005,0.0014755209,0.000451946,0.0000015402157,0.00009685048,0.022067077,0.000011414023,0.000040837473,0.0011954308,0.9746407,0.000008831495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0556295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15943013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0556295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075402935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010737062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11061138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2238561466","doi":"","title":"Civil Law and Religion in the Supreme Court of Canada: What Should We Get Out of Bruker V. Marcovitz?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Precedent; Majority opinion; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.019966193296892615,"score_gpt":0.2822889075886577,"score_spread":0.2623227142917651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2238561466","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029626463,0.030302333,0.000476302,0.8833546,0.0015008184,0.00003286042,0.00029126758,0.000034463974,0.054380946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7053234,0.021640267,0.0016707233,0.24567057,0.0013789207,0.000061413346,0.00026706382,0.00007936472,0.023908203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98777163,0.0019236782,0.00025180436,0.0009017233,0.0044710394,0.0046802363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750611,0.0067205518,0.0010044266,0.00044344668,0.010306291,0.006464152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008736807,0.0004361531,0.0008492614,0.0026028834,0.036871124,0.0204195,0.0047061765,0.01341569,0.0054760408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046872705,0.0005682736,0.0006036901,0.0049886582,0.027192041,0.008865772,0.004470508,0.017751575,0.0004354481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007111651,0.000058334335,0.012399097,0.00022701683,0.0000726809,0.00083525304,0.02590098,0.0005865974,0.0002565229,0.58537143,0.3291566,0.045064323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013342389,0.000051010815,0.042581048,0.0029723903,0.00019668795,0.00029173546,0.08099954,0.0017897408,0.00065083714,0.18163101,0.6881082,0.0005943769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99771774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19399138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19399138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32618073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93485576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241646490","doi":"","title":"R. v. Kapp: New Directions for Section 15","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Supreme court; Law; Plaintiff; Charter; Scrutiny; Expansive; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; High Court; Prejudice (legal term); Dignity; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.019504955858555544,"score_gpt":0.31398009446856007,"score_spread":0.2944751386100045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241646490","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012072773,0.0076312567,0.009763435,0.72612256,0.0025606584,0.000089153225,0.00012733895,0.000233656,0.24139917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44260988,0.0072958376,0.02807735,0.44341272,0.0033843452,0.00040787406,0.0002280379,0.00021307325,0.07437083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751437,0.0069999867,0.00074517523,0.0028855607,0.009345527,0.004880186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97876894,0.0117273955,0.00094300456,0.0015247295,0.004291063,0.0027448745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025850808,0.0007739143,0.0009804645,0.0019692557,0.010738677,0.015802491,0.0064557013,0.029276352,0.006886878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034374855,0.00063318457,0.0015724218,0.0015644714,0.03384536,0.015410938,0.0072581414,0.022133343,0.0010390669],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013001188,0.000018194467,0.0002426734,0.000038285936,0.000004278857,0.00013367643,0.0018846795,0.00013031035,0.00011866499,0.95744395,0.032478407,0.0074939253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088380184,0.00008640716,0.0014102529,0.0006019759,0.000034616387,0.00019629988,0.0037746227,0.00079877174,0.00038573772,0.57045466,0.42199698,0.00017114183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3323048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44531202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66769516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021411728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0969678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66074115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2242895667","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1951913","title":"The Substance and Scope of Aboriginal Rights in Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.014574102379274232,"score_gpt":0.28169079311891093,"score_spread":0.2671166907396367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2242895667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17146043,0.0028288541,0.0044999127,0.019071639,0.00011580616,0.00009562902,0.00024030793,0.000032202588,0.8016552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98788303,0.0005241408,0.0009902962,0.0006618674,0.00003740423,0.00003465421,0.000025025394,0.0000185532,0.009824913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876637,0.0028756014,0.00033054373,0.0009961324,0.0037077335,0.004426356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98010296,0.011308144,0.00068824325,0.0012503093,0.0052570603,0.0013931803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011746056,0.00037408437,0.000708576,0.0046695084,0.03139732,0.022788404,0.0031489774,0.0039007305,0.0072694537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02777549,0.0009086299,0.0006568613,0.005317968,0.068399996,0.00724223,0.006497088,0.006436736,0.00024496976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008454081,0.0000052996797,0.00074648816,0.000015542273,0.000003897831,0.000036102458,0.01724423,0.00010542382,0.00006733978,0.9783036,0.0009808617,0.0024827484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040413735,0.000023743853,0.019431265,0.00052295666,0.0000973484,0.000119497694,0.069519475,0.0012802021,0.00047333929,0.80330485,0.10506534,0.00012157088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96034163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97572076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.104384206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.104384206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16592441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.757364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243195124","doi":"","title":"The Apologia Canadiana lessons for an Indian Boarding School Apologia Americana","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indigenous policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pledge; Redress; Obedience; Government (linguistics); Political science; Sociology; Law; Gender studies; Media studies; History","score_opus":0.0495348030333861,"score_gpt":0.3869202445506811,"score_spread":0.337385441517295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243195124","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066999085,0.009339573,0.00035796626,0.75474256,0.019457487,0.00005242937,0.0001158845,0.00009988609,0.20913428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11615437,0.011346941,0.0017393979,0.22366592,0.0033558062,0.000074873016,0.00014092319,0.00018616168,0.6433356],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966337,0.00048163976,0.00006170429,0.00030474307,0.0012397066,0.0012784909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99131525,0.00051331776,0.00017030236,0.0001699451,0.0027746826,0.0050564804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00322042,0.00048685764,0.00045820588,0.0010968717,0.040556896,0.007110712,0.0016958695,0.004146419,0.029598488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062317844,0.0003408663,0.00043168952,0.0010290449,0.008093179,0.0035658842,0.0043255812,0.014355188,0.0038901577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007294795,0.00004227768,0.0005157908,0.000031492345,0.0000023221146,0.00023342998,0.0056190593,0.000015334128,0.000085913816,0.019081412,0.956985,0.017380761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025212416,0.0000037149412,0.0006774327,0.000064851636,0.0000020345774,0.000055912697,0.005780855,0.000009264702,0.000017786455,0.00080222957,0.99257517,0.000008195775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83722603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95786357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16277397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035144836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.087121375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32746512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245562801","doi":"","title":"Examining Sexual Diversity: Sexual Orientation and Marriage in a Canadian Legal Context","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Human sexuality; Framing (construction); Religious freedom; Opposition (politics); Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Freedom of religion; Gender studies; Law; Psychology; Human rights; Geography","score_opus":0.024801567493390363,"score_gpt":0.2820850223687811,"score_spread":0.2572834548753907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245562801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9477123,0.002568589,0.00023927698,0.004373046,0.000035284567,0.000051755214,0.00050948065,0.0000054794914,0.044504832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99606544,0.0015018292,0.0003078857,0.00032494753,0.000010322408,0.000018241075,0.00013803804,0.0000038653843,0.0016294362],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748033,0.000453231,0.000050940034,0.00020687457,0.00082996016,0.0009786626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961313,0.000758357,0.00060267805,0.000121446166,0.0015045844,0.0008817606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027761792,0.00038915212,0.00046507534,0.0051528406,0.020819616,0.0046268557,0.0016631142,0.00085536257,0.003645642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075067286,0.00025810607,0.00038805557,0.009372274,0.0074062063,0.0016012372,0.004124068,0.0017934138,0.0001212836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011203659,0.00019534738,0.5902648,0.00020011385,0.00006301127,0.0009260957,0.25424677,0.00087947375,0.00070861925,0.067830585,0.0069361497,0.077637054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000955672,0.00004171036,0.7082551,0.00026913185,0.000044512926,0.0001654973,0.2641243,0.00064479205,0.00016719202,0.0034375396,0.022767136,0.00007356249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9978154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09595445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09595445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10299311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6962015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246619878","doi":"","title":"Law, Theory and Aboriginal Peoples","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Liberalism; Oppression; Law; Political science; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.014327107353190488,"score_gpt":0.2974042242211967,"score_spread":0.28307711686800624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246619878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05031837,0.029488444,0.0021384957,0.07511932,0.0006950277,0.00006024186,0.00004749199,0.000058624206,0.842074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8881735,0.011360366,0.0017934709,0.0077040796,0.00024644134,0.00007445309,0.00004351508,0.000039085757,0.09056505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99642366,0.0013347799,0.00006993433,0.00029870862,0.000874785,0.0009980878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970464,0.0013184879,0.00022500883,0.00017542733,0.0007273872,0.00050726236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037722904,0.00041663903,0.00047074247,0.0031362306,0.027158966,0.010316019,0.002368259,0.003654094,0.004834766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004763498,0.00022104871,0.00029139698,0.0032470329,0.08312438,0.0043447823,0.004629896,0.0041952557,0.00041301618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001780532,0.000012856512,0.00050400826,0.00003606138,0.0000016254191,0.00012230068,0.051859703,0.000092068396,0.000026337442,0.93623763,0.0056533767,0.0054521523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008787403,0.000016783157,0.002963637,0.00058049575,0.000009365183,0.00023375613,0.1060439,0.00039198488,0.00009527622,0.46367466,0.425952,0.000029365438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8234134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7751991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8234134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050818365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05228317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3687148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246738569","doi":"","title":"Poverty and a Victorian Bill of Rights: A View from Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Poverty; Government (linguistics); Charter; Human rights; Political science; Bill of rights; Law and economics; Fundamental rights; Rights of Nature; Law; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.006160849017486987,"score_gpt":0.23402596992511732,"score_spread":0.22786512090763034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246738569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0312595,0.020095443,0.003111216,0.31586686,0.00086324435,0.00013240793,0.00019142371,0.000039356844,0.62844044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69938755,0.015880702,0.005227037,0.11338667,0.00039883464,0.0001611778,0.00010139273,0.00011891082,0.16533771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880179,0.0019211444,0.00025843107,0.0009920038,0.0047454913,0.004065015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99488175,0.0015560309,0.00019832356,0.00015273549,0.0018634507,0.0013477638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00489731,0.0004668383,0.0005687206,0.0020525341,0.04068253,0.016395641,0.0032003422,0.013076919,0.0041444623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009575277,0.0008220518,0.00084696425,0.0027454528,0.030881291,0.0057049063,0.005569365,0.017004875,0.0003523761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007194538,0.00000716962,0.00022545435,0.00003318647,0.0000033783597,0.0001946556,0.00734403,0.00022361752,0.00009400846,0.9721377,0.015699884,0.0040296935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028828033,0.000025552674,0.0027133524,0.0005370212,0.000025893505,0.00022124742,0.014316767,0.0012681264,0.00017753689,0.20851284,0.772009,0.0001638866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99308926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25155085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25155085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2726724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8680949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247011054","doi":"","title":"Legal lawlessness and the rule of law: a critique of Section 25.1 of the Criminal Code","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Lawlessness; Law; Political science; Criminal code; Criminal law; Parliament; Criminal procedure; Public law; Rule of law; Due process; Sources of law; Politics","score_opus":0.05712437520175705,"score_gpt":0.39163827127572975,"score_spread":0.3345138960739727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2247011054","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025874635,0.023765143,0.00875346,0.6396335,0.0012332825,0.00004809447,0.00011433427,0.000041840063,0.3005357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87310106,0.0076984963,0.003055962,0.09184627,0.0025442245,0.0001308151,0.00007063779,0.00009529261,0.021457264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880072,0.005103765,0.0003052583,0.0013001036,0.0035878273,0.0016958885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98571235,0.010332654,0.0010543965,0.0006039109,0.0015417221,0.00075505814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012458345,0.00050028175,0.0010001303,0.00317171,0.012922661,0.012380693,0.0038550394,0.013315052,0.0023991421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017800096,0.0004614145,0.00075255707,0.0025299233,0.11902317,0.009447636,0.004340601,0.021740418,0.00036664636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020978264,0.000003971976,0.000047469268,0.000009041862,0.0000011104484,0.000024336503,0.0030877236,0.000046995898,0.0000091195325,0.9924736,0.003280242,0.0010142599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018303976,0.000008960839,0.0005313603,0.00019421194,0.000005535575,0.0000639389,0.0028860809,0.00028683673,0.000069567046,0.90977067,0.08614576,0.00001865118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23547165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19853958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23547165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028708993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03354947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4682021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247480324","doi":"","title":"Crown—First Nations Relationships: A Comparative Analysis of the Tsawwassen Final Agreement and Tsilhqot'in v. British Columbia","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Jurisdiction; Law; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.08702964039289833,"score_gpt":0.3423852135808513,"score_spread":0.25535557318795293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2247480324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.802068,0.0044240337,0.00017271677,0.004183054,0.00006120384,0.00008438658,0.00047915566,0.0000075094317,0.18851991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870897,0.0015371374,0.00007025943,0.0004249275,0.0000069967928,0.000029667663,0.00019579202,0.000009707482,0.01063584],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947744,0.0008391803,0.00011014045,0.00028527202,0.001639687,0.0023513653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99171656,0.0028194028,0.0007100863,0.00021321674,0.003465931,0.0010748551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021504518,0.00017952625,0.000542339,0.0044534844,0.019100053,0.007545445,0.0018163752,0.0013974613,0.009883607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011651484,0.0003225124,0.00021490167,0.013583224,0.0065490706,0.0018193707,0.0032984524,0.0033186374,0.0004233971],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030744125,0.00022181033,0.124483734,0.0005923664,0.0001249144,0.00535148,0.5721651,0.00067953335,0.0010465091,0.1858175,0.034236155,0.07497347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014573755,0.000041734307,0.37443483,0.0005991099,0.000058280733,0.00026878872,0.53635365,0.0003150128,0.00024671626,0.0027350471,0.08487301,0.000059300797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98232067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8918526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10814739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05758585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7846679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247778769","doi":"","title":"Unions de même sexe au Canada et au Royaume-Uni. Variations autour de la notion d’égalité. Réflexions de droit comparé à partir de l’affaire Wilkinson v. Kitzinger (Same-Sex Unions in Canada and the United-Kingdom. Comparative Reflections on Equality in light of Wilkinson v. Kitzinger)","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.03729751485872895,"score_gpt":0.339531321835356,"score_spread":0.30223380697662705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2247778769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15137368,0.050857842,0.0021581207,0.09469755,0.0008336917,0.000058286936,0.00038124312,0.00005206493,0.69958746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9040857,0.006758298,0.000563746,0.006577397,0.000083892446,0.00003908168,0.00007033535,0.000036433656,0.081785105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949897,0.00093831035,0.000090858885,0.000491507,0.0013712045,0.002118475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982064,0.0003881007,0.00017529023,0.00010834165,0.00068646314,0.00043544214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022436737,0.00032848155,0.00040556974,0.0016440831,0.022482492,0.008873863,0.0017813991,0.0034220892,0.008867381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004638749,0.00035544336,0.00036586286,0.0031872627,0.023545602,0.0036751833,0.004410597,0.0045210538,0.0004642544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038072147,0.000010296586,0.002161651,0.00004751332,0.000006810666,0.00013793416,0.043705523,0.00012801343,0.00012253653,0.9262344,0.011940839,0.015466452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029288773,0.000030994997,0.03344394,0.0007883719,0.000049516544,0.00020952923,0.14587003,0.00042095085,0.00072642625,0.055439144,0.76286143,0.00013033599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98264956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10170056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10170056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08390263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7378926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247957086","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Charter's Transformative Aspirations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Democracy; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Transformative learning; Blueprint; Human rights; Politics; Law; Liberal democracy; Covenant; Liberalism; Sociology; Law and economics; Public administration; Political economy","score_opus":0.02145665105796961,"score_gpt":0.2812952374062414,"score_spread":0.2598385863482718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2247957086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021391096,0.005119878,0.0048845415,0.2598999,0.0032345173,0.000116109004,0.00059875706,0.00026181157,0.70449346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5923079,0.0043132054,0.009186073,0.03028166,0.0007177544,0.00010868037,0.00029713757,0.00023106541,0.36255652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888151,0.0013559089,0.00018437588,0.0012989548,0.005833088,0.0025125255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896903,0.0015734049,0.00031363146,0.0006779096,0.0053424747,0.0024022446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008032222,0.000607649,0.0004798387,0.002036054,0.025025055,0.017567754,0.0017152799,0.004370724,0.00932334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017942533,0.00040443157,0.0005256091,0.0024908527,0.02069241,0.0034409035,0.0033711675,0.0069032167,0.0007168958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011395211,0.000008434367,0.00032718023,0.000016085434,0.0000022956183,0.000069582806,0.0035564578,0.00022713657,0.000091829155,0.8982043,0.08544796,0.012037241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011228037,0.000010782648,0.0018134067,0.00006871431,0.000005810792,0.00006123881,0.00271248,0.00059939345,0.0001472016,0.039469793,0.9550426,0.000057308145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98457944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98517644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13466908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13466908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2428704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97709715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2248284683","doi":"","title":"From Total Simulation to Error Determining the Will","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia canonica","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Jurisprudence; Theology","score_opus":0.048306760304624496,"score_gpt":0.3601013815498706,"score_spread":0.3117946212452461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2248284683","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.123197146,0.003022128,0.50600994,0.0189731,0.0008296131,0.00023994218,0.00041267485,0.00059862307,0.34671685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94549805,0.00082277955,0.035076465,0.0006994056,0.000117629614,0.00013557044,0.00013772916,0.00026139637,0.017250948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9808214,0.011859526,0.00069044676,0.0026995898,0.002568431,0.0013607034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9407914,0.043033395,0.0026209767,0.0067878594,0.0053758794,0.0013905008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017276973,0.0010682762,0.0011886202,0.0022586328,0.003339812,0.009152413,0.0019728916,0.0027934243,0.024204861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.097102605,0.00074190454,0.001424203,0.0014699615,0.019489624,0.009960343,0.008664187,0.003156709,0.0021032027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090599744,0.000015523368,0.0025693246,0.000084897874,0.000024674711,0.00009319966,0.0015883201,0.012013941,0.00011139847,0.967558,0.001667797,0.014182251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027994782,0.00004183576,0.00092653965,0.00016924668,0.000026020922,0.00009825223,0.0011366858,0.023005908,0.00042159721,0.9611803,0.012932558,0.000033118366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012419077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007021191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024204861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071665063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074208737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09137046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2249178127","doi":"","title":"Section 7 and the Politics of Social Justice","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Injustice; Charter; Politics; Political science; Jurisprudence; Social rights; Redistribution (election); Doctrine; Section (typography); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.019417568292551566,"score_gpt":0.29600428295068215,"score_spread":0.27658671465813056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2249178127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033364333,0.005144583,0.004949831,0.05580933,0.00050637923,0.000050374045,0.000072716764,0.00004558309,0.90005696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9063164,0.002619946,0.0019045309,0.015023453,0.00032942306,0.000056120214,0.000051316325,0.00004637034,0.073652394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906262,0.0020787236,0.00015435135,0.00084178237,0.0027164414,0.0035824368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974254,0.00089675136,0.00019118072,0.00018250318,0.00092171127,0.00038245608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051559852,0.00033047458,0.00038113745,0.001440556,0.019893382,0.009691277,0.0011819453,0.005078801,0.0047368524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005265141,0.00025294744,0.00046702588,0.001519768,0.055402435,0.0025933713,0.003790696,0.0053915335,0.00037873338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018997031,0.0000012331697,0.00009534296,0.0000041273347,0.0000012015238,0.000020188485,0.001328086,0.00006751164,0.000028724535,0.9952791,0.0017396444,0.0014329863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018909406,0.00001787328,0.002716447,0.00018964734,0.000017104956,0.00006841591,0.006308762,0.00041114623,0.00028246944,0.61874574,0.37117416,0.00004932553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8318663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8435746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8318663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05843272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07804148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42396104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2249632633","doi":"","title":"Skewering the Credibility of Women: A Reappraisal of Corroboration in Australian Legal History","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Newspaper; Doctrine; Law; Disadvantaged; Legal doctrine; History; Criminology; Sexual assault; Political science; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.02066214647348808,"score_gpt":0.29818472630024045,"score_spread":0.2775225798267524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2249632633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7216752,0.019657653,0.0053826384,0.10710948,0.0010186168,0.000096320706,0.00005307563,0.0000185627,0.1449884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99210006,0.0032930796,0.0005500547,0.0013807822,0.00034281233,0.000015603418,0.0000065562067,0.0000062028835,0.002304764],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98798275,0.008054849,0.0004174699,0.00056240486,0.0020462319,0.0009361916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9426549,0.043654505,0.0062340917,0.002194546,0.004497225,0.00076470687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021736726,0.0003026587,0.0005510382,0.005691525,0.016301544,0.009990496,0.0024154396,0.006334844,0.0019694094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06728294,0.0007773697,0.00030761224,0.0037533324,0.051441636,0.011943461,0.01050681,0.006392329,0.0001504569],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030467121,0.000009438427,0.005099065,0.00015191748,0.0000109626,0.0023504412,0.8850857,0.00005245489,0.00025423517,0.08881543,0.0011172589,0.017022636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014838926,0.000108075124,0.042014256,0.0020356104,0.00006348007,0.0027522114,0.70742226,0.0005278514,0.0010670723,0.061678603,0.18221727,0.000098480705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050128914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08631492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050128914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009230879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006981558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11495614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252325734","doi":"","title":"Источники права британской колонии Квебек в последней трети XVIII века: проблемы выбора","year":2015,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Сервис в России и за рубежом","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Possession (linguistics); Legal history; Criminal law; English law; Political science; Colonialism; Comparative law; Common law; Private law; Population; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.08736214381171259,"score_gpt":0.3479043318057371,"score_spread":0.2605421879940245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252325734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04465654,0.033976875,0.033841345,0.0094225565,0.0012580074,0.0001635501,0.00051973586,0.00043093943,0.8757306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48924863,0.026752295,0.05164621,0.000697657,0.00041979292,0.0002273045,0.00034506107,0.00026710675,0.43039593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990515,0.00013362257,0.000036124282,0.0001222864,0.0005127252,0.00014377724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995296,0.00010649924,0.000043688822,0.00006255528,0.00018957029,0.00006806844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007510079,0.00038542028,0.00019399218,0.0013526581,0.0023778637,0.0056984806,0.0004081978,0.0009557479,0.019659452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013574112,0.00050056726,0.00020578617,0.0017608033,0.002435166,0.00091867836,0.0009991665,0.001661397,0.00777817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005480811,0.000040919025,0.0011158106,0.00022077054,0.000013464868,0.00068225345,0.0070617003,0.0007687787,0.0064539965,0.7442688,0.025133919,0.21418484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008356295,0.000015897254,0.0025621941,0.00012917926,0.00001292265,0.00028753656,0.0012528336,0.0002414238,0.0016989155,0.035507828,0.9582575,0.00002535393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055533584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9444664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004490175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00654681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110420704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252680423","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004173","title":"Dignity and Membership, Equality and Egalitarianism: Economic Rights and Section 15","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Egalitarianism; Rhetorical question; Law and economics; Appeal; Equity (law); Political science; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02709716758799447,"score_gpt":0.2927739755742289,"score_spread":0.26567680798623444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252680423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03841316,0.01128923,0.031217119,0.12107603,0.0012336024,0.000083609644,0.00009040652,0.000064272615,0.7965325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9116908,0.002637395,0.007871859,0.025741467,0.0007165526,0.0001796382,0.000048439008,0.00006534282,0.051048554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909841,0.0038883192,0.00037242557,0.0009487112,0.002469501,0.0013368807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940767,0.0038978062,0.000517729,0.0004950502,0.00071372156,0.00029895036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011735672,0.00049796,0.0005096518,0.0011801583,0.0072457897,0.008821589,0.0020553882,0.007516456,0.006012691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012478876,0.00033482333,0.0006265873,0.0011451631,0.05818682,0.012784571,0.007838614,0.008679784,0.000556708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019993588,0.0000016888536,0.00003871526,0.0000060698762,7.988268e-7,0.000012284358,0.0010862562,0.000023147415,0.000013483456,0.9973908,0.00056186673,0.0008630108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000086076325,0.000014038602,0.0003306994,0.00013787442,0.0000056139975,0.0000517909,0.0013404194,0.00019809719,0.00020218467,0.9204771,0.07721688,0.000016732878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03944926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026870117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9605507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0146288965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008182122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106140554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252882086","doi":"","title":"La gouvernance autochtone avec ou sans la Charte canadienne? (Aboriginal Governance with or without the Canadian Charter?)","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Charter; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.00992450353422382,"score_gpt":0.2696000425591104,"score_spread":0.2596755390248866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252882086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10508558,0.0066944533,0.0024418638,0.056496937,0.000538477,0.0000498986,0.00012278631,0.00003725358,0.8285328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9210986,0.0017305326,0.0006225623,0.0024932814,0.000086213055,0.00002038181,0.00002797663,0.000017374365,0.07390302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699795,0.0006840346,0.000033166118,0.00033174994,0.000628652,0.0013244648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987991,0.00029783443,0.00012576081,0.0001208669,0.0004218874,0.00023464579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022007485,0.00021710244,0.00020497563,0.00070722436,0.013043858,0.007817187,0.00092087634,0.0016755188,0.0072528934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032724987,0.00015895524,0.00020974065,0.0013498302,0.022321623,0.0021821763,0.0022456218,0.0031648204,0.0003894457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008656067,0.0000038996905,0.00067673624,0.000022623994,0.000002388409,0.00006888393,0.021005457,0.00009265873,0.000088227316,0.9671533,0.006307208,0.004570009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002151871,0.00003309849,0.020137489,0.00047511252,0.000033613494,0.00017085472,0.069678746,0.0005090191,0.00056624576,0.097713895,0.8105928,0.000067683504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94587076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054129243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050261326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060726732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36467314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253060874","doi":"","title":"The Strange History of Charter-Like Claims Against Legislated Government Services Under the Human Rights Codes in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Statute; Human rights; Appeal; Statutory law; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Statutory interpretation; Fundamental rights; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.013678796667148505,"score_gpt":0.24524191404215748,"score_spread":0.23156311737500898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253060874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17546883,0.017933376,0.011513922,0.3202134,0.0033863145,0.00031720582,0.0015181771,0.0004120763,0.46923667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86708367,0.005740062,0.0034362455,0.05680624,0.00042863507,0.00008906976,0.0003004077,0.00023907358,0.0658766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98109734,0.0014043272,0.00046743744,0.0022853294,0.010514043,0.0042315866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97985166,0.007800998,0.0009868892,0.0010801463,0.007851631,0.0024285845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00871671,0.00055257976,0.000718737,0.0031753683,0.035663396,0.013679567,0.0040750774,0.0127611095,0.006034543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031662453,0.0014343489,0.0009704104,0.0044721616,0.022491446,0.004457884,0.004612113,0.018099984,0.00037291614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009102062,0.00006188024,0.0069977203,0.00018051274,0.000082385384,0.0022915755,0.030570883,0.00078860583,0.0009834596,0.8030261,0.107909374,0.04701658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009682152,0.00006941994,0.028465733,0.0007076146,0.00011630177,0.0007734047,0.013925813,0.0029581068,0.0021761295,0.055613086,0.8945259,0.00057167036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9937164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20789775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20789775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21181475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9187263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253362603","doi":"","title":"Rencontre des Cultures Juridiques dans la Toundra Subarctique: Vers une Nouvelle Gouvernance Foncière au Nunatsiavut (Legal Cultures Encounter in the Subarctic Toundra: Towards a New Land Governance in Nunatsiavut)","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007839938328262373,"score_gpt":0.2780338457300933,"score_spread":0.27019390740183097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253362603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97544575,0.0014929655,0.00028633323,0.0019145774,0.00003191664,0.000014141504,0.000031913838,0.0000043097198,0.020778162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99422425,0.0003323122,0.00015540796,0.000117337404,0.000006982033,0.00000704287,0.000010175349,0.0000021273354,0.0051444424],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999493,0.00017571816,0.000013890452,0.000076124175,0.00004984662,0.00019143823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948585,0.0001461923,0.00013539648,0.000022354261,0.00007496196,0.00013532522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081841537,0.00015683034,0.00018643007,0.000621985,0.0081158485,0.0028976253,0.00043017676,0.0005043828,0.0030083433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008055937,0.00014079943,0.00008553683,0.0010290262,0.006322253,0.00087935437,0.002083748,0.000966974,0.000104397135],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010943988,0.000051627452,0.15205756,0.00018163127,0.000019189674,0.0023759562,0.7266572,0.00038913087,0.0036323867,0.07411669,0.0016837063,0.038725395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015764414,0.00006510053,0.30156448,0.00029786598,0.000022586068,0.0006416962,0.5708696,0.0003111999,0.0009978341,0.004058001,0.12112288,0.000032967317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43320927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70534134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5667907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011827452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008922749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86137545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253413733","doi":"","title":"Human Rights and Family Responsibilities: Family Status Discrimination Under Human Rights Law in British Columbia and Canada -- A Study Paper","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Sexual orientation; Human rights; Law; Nationality; Political science; Jurisprudence; Legislation; Sociology; Immigration; Gender studies","score_opus":0.016026536154098034,"score_gpt":0.28418039803439105,"score_spread":0.268153861880293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253413733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68150485,0.07248989,0.00053671916,0.052073568,0.00051114656,0.00018937043,0.0013828281,0.000022917178,0.19128868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94540393,0.027793502,0.00048486164,0.0037952575,0.00003826069,0.000042932155,0.00033810036,0.000015089186,0.022088153],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974873,0.00042203828,0.00008944043,0.00020112855,0.0007342821,0.0010658741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944141,0.0013142804,0.00040699466,0.00009694099,0.0025686757,0.0011989392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019473352,0.0002636578,0.00040387252,0.0028925834,0.020267999,0.0079908855,0.0016744973,0.001401621,0.004017045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052687735,0.0003314505,0.00020287685,0.010255787,0.006846164,0.0020572795,0.0023387724,0.0021044181,0.00020186884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113586466,0.00022481906,0.1882745,0.0014996768,0.00006313092,0.0037386254,0.3680355,0.0007456344,0.0008853893,0.1335638,0.0867433,0.21611199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012548798,0.000030594147,0.254844,0.0017489512,0.000048722955,0.00044043642,0.4690193,0.0003658853,0.00027018803,0.0034961377,0.2696222,0.00010102613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99889696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18399082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18399082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24786218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.946455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253516837","doi":"10.29173/alr1343","title":"Loyalty and Distinctiveness: A New Approach to the Crown's Fiduciary Duty toward Aboriginal Peoples","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Duty; Flourishing; Charter; Law; Negotiation; Political science; Supreme court; Loyalty; Faith; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Theology","score_opus":0.03746424019614437,"score_gpt":0.33333762283838714,"score_spread":0.2958733826422428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253516837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17818764,0.0075547514,0.03234341,0.11080952,0.0009889653,0.000105222556,0.000038779235,0.00004158536,0.6699302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780447,0.0007776556,0.0030922682,0.0041655046,0.000245557,0.000032270695,0.0000064322026,0.00001220925,0.013623404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994743,0.0023535527,0.0001491703,0.00049833575,0.0013319899,0.00092384155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962986,0.0017602089,0.00032837002,0.00042057404,0.00063836446,0.00055383303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057044164,0.00021917504,0.00044451872,0.0017924998,0.008714955,0.010585356,0.0021583254,0.004853876,0.0021051674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007747817,0.00030460604,0.0005177781,0.0010104568,0.043120105,0.0070163254,0.0051888907,0.005963205,0.00013741791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038871567,0.0000073480487,0.00031751627,0.000009582968,0.0000019041285,0.000058431684,0.0047430475,0.000077428296,0.000058002235,0.9900192,0.0008633049,0.003840363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016664124,0.000049267866,0.0033195987,0.0001804436,0.000033006483,0.0003174295,0.011022648,0.001003277,0.00023075612,0.9068285,0.07694932,0.000049040325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048804898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11837488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9511951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01467038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01660894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10644156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253764572","doi":"10.21991/c9dd3z","title":"HOW CAN INFRINGEMENTS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF ABORIGINAL PEOPLES BE JUSTIFIED?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Trilogy; Constitution; Bill of rights; Political science; Government (linguistics); Fishing; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.039783466332995385,"score_gpt":0.28808667613706007,"score_spread":0.24830320980406467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253764572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07168607,0.0040230434,0.0152312685,0.24232814,0.0013112404,0.0001822189,0.0000975861,0.00006634471,0.6650741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92172956,0.0018649097,0.0062790075,0.027874436,0.0006845672,0.00022412138,0.00006019921,0.00006184541,0.04122129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9605836,0.017009163,0.0013063503,0.0029138336,0.00914962,0.009037343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9619539,0.02164266,0.003163875,0.0041983146,0.006948173,0.002093167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04233555,0.000620997,0.0015328834,0.0020051035,0.0114085525,0.012404446,0.0033853804,0.02346358,0.010583233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08419899,0.0007554362,0.00097222155,0.0012141585,0.04922461,0.010689385,0.008509279,0.013728279,0.0014841548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017123997,0.00003563632,0.00061377836,0.000067655325,0.0000374127,0.00020361671,0.0053903894,0.000202622,0.00028651807,0.98525846,0.0028696274,0.005017177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006907184,0.000053199103,0.0018104797,0.00043451763,0.00008591326,0.00023853761,0.008691746,0.0006402504,0.00095765287,0.8864418,0.100497745,0.00007917857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05395831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04316544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05395831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008874014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024274081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22389448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254494288","doi":"","title":"Domestic Violence and the Construction of 'Ideal Victims': Assaulted Women's 'Image Problems' in Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Saint Louis University public law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Agency (philosophy); Acknowledgement; Context (archaeology); Ideal (ethics); Criminology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Poison control; Sociology; Suicide prevention; Computer security; Medicine","score_opus":0.01368615533496723,"score_gpt":0.25549906045984383,"score_spread":0.2418129051248766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254494288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61286336,0.17091736,0.0010562186,0.0926809,0.00087147177,0.00006318878,0.000083708495,0.000016510194,0.121447355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691685,0.026498545,0.00020166134,0.0017461125,0.0001712307,0.000024716395,0.000026635587,0.000008638077,0.0021539652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932547,0.0051138336,0.00013802631,0.00016524942,0.0009307358,0.00039737625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922484,0.0038076248,0.0018803552,0.00024008985,0.0014055918,0.00041785333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005267404,0.00020663062,0.00040807133,0.0022433514,0.0029632235,0.005048982,0.00095475354,0.0014510978,0.0023007898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01780505,0.00024252033,0.0001641086,0.002037785,0.017099656,0.003211286,0.0023391128,0.0021470585,0.00020234831],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001280368,0.0002940885,0.06402049,0.0016376179,0.00008922933,0.0011355105,0.30356783,0.00023721985,0.00036843753,0.39963686,0.04359624,0.18528849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066312,0.00021730087,0.2104625,0.0036672761,0.00009657756,0.0029172243,0.51930046,0.00027019606,0.000644226,0.06711741,0.1951642,0.00007631969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015779814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03308371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015779814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003633262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048095747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031375945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254746409","doi":"","title":"Le ad populum dans l‚arrêt “Langstaff c. Bar of the Province of Quebec“ (1916)","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Publications Doc Du Juriste","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Geography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.015503972555144636,"score_gpt":0.27285444618363053,"score_spread":0.2573504736284859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254746409","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.064036705,0.08089348,0.002283767,0.15810385,0.006999456,0.00009590273,0.0016690654,0.0001793605,0.68573844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29410136,0.0051408745,0.00064544077,0.008617711,0.00042902358,0.00003796629,0.00013302971,0.0000803682,0.69081426],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990717,0.00020171927,0.000017632945,0.000113867536,0.00026570706,0.00032933362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931896,0.0001533924,0.000036309157,0.000024429502,0.0003396098,0.0001272489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089039595,0.00045213397,0.00034719004,0.0008202298,0.017612142,0.003971272,0.0008147008,0.0027719303,0.021212285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023140833,0.00041484056,0.00026470912,0.0011443197,0.004585509,0.0013216233,0.0011702111,0.004286964,0.001370905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009773135,0.000028398457,0.005597975,0.00015809809,0.000018531466,0.0010647087,0.0269835,0.0003538363,0.0007265316,0.41147244,0.5013987,0.052099604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063276775,0.0000071219474,0.00670054,0.00010795308,0.0000041912913,0.00011221062,0.0038051393,0.000088589324,0.00019028672,0.0021940211,0.98676366,0.000020057048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9824898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9928052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049649872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049649872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03960204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3602367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255134162","doi":"","title":"Redress Packages for Institutional Child Abuse: Exploring the Grandview Agreement as a Case Study in 'Alternative' Dispute Resolution","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Tort; Human settlement; Liability; Engineering","score_opus":0.12466087013505432,"score_gpt":0.3870544596650099,"score_spread":0.26239358952995556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255134162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78575736,0.0042647407,0.017513687,0.021471465,0.00027856635,0.0004409061,0.00005541409,0.000034028235,0.17018373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810667,0.0019808349,0.0058025303,0.0017981229,0.00007613627,0.00030787144,0.000021754402,0.000023578357,0.008922441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9626072,0.029271973,0.00072193495,0.00108476,0.0029937574,0.003320353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9707992,0.02409604,0.0017861697,0.0011050513,0.0011488721,0.0010646987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024999158,0.0006135868,0.00086286967,0.0027091985,0.026919516,0.013475094,0.004699137,0.01200325,0.0046938164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03170452,0.00084090896,0.0011009916,0.004425768,0.028881405,0.009971263,0.013797837,0.011482017,0.0004363448],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030977255,0.00015468849,0.0038022532,0.00012150407,0.0000135657565,0.01035418,0.46424723,0.000524182,0.0001965748,0.51057386,0.0018786552,0.008102253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050329923,0.00021995831,0.005374601,0.0008260332,0.000038240454,0.0106363995,0.79522157,0.0024222073,0.00069293636,0.048394818,0.13603179,0.000091156406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029335603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053239547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029335603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0137472395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073276884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13220978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255962489","doi":"","title":"First Nations Self-Government and the Borders of the Canadian Legal Imagination","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Treaty; Sovereignty; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; International law; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.005387310696429375,"score_gpt":0.2534695639295857,"score_spread":0.24808225323315633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255962489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078764826,0.018157065,0.0015856475,0.12479836,0.0004312307,0.000025926052,0.000078889265,0.00004220074,0.7761158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672121,0.0050747176,0.0008130109,0.0038439417,0.00004822489,0.00001369175,0.00002832968,0.000019903813,0.022946047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99562633,0.0008979729,0.00007039312,0.00032947207,0.0014875247,0.0015882826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99573743,0.001508969,0.00024176175,0.00018501423,0.0013443409,0.0009824407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033343248,0.0003480618,0.00039373527,0.0024482592,0.037455495,0.01618779,0.0015255779,0.0033024647,0.0041414225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067971647,0.0002817395,0.00026905377,0.0027799136,0.06653418,0.0057507292,0.004679315,0.005058131,0.00022840124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005814771,0.0000051711336,0.00041223157,0.000015935051,0.0000017204602,0.000064508524,0.036824744,0.0000763821,0.000049964357,0.9516367,0.0055567045,0.005350077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017610175,0.000013883236,0.0074200183,0.0005749938,0.000020611405,0.00024168096,0.16123961,0.0007399126,0.00024204445,0.30500385,0.52440083,0.00008494154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9864161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99060893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8556844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14431562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16512951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256564956","doi":"","title":"Intimacy, Rights and the Parent-Child Relationship: Rethinking Freedom of Association in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Political science; Sociology; Family law; Law; Gender studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010627605626796944,"score_gpt":0.249423722021246,"score_spread":0.23879611639444906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256564956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4862315,0.0067794514,0.006430285,0.04548172,0.00031622653,0.00014189769,0.0002575382,0.00006955325,0.45429173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97549736,0.0015092128,0.0014709199,0.0012439012,0.000020636891,0.000025061774,0.000036590915,0.00002113656,0.020175228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958483,0.0006208687,0.00008730547,0.00050082884,0.001314193,0.0016285962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99652773,0.001152445,0.00022033784,0.0002273937,0.0008141495,0.001057903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031379783,0.00025097828,0.00043203597,0.002069361,0.03378761,0.010081412,0.0023866575,0.002557705,0.0051495684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00768352,0.00037002537,0.00041735973,0.0037163126,0.02652816,0.003791416,0.008921973,0.004118622,0.00015313733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027240514,0.000021586042,0.01143856,0.000052127878,0.000010182027,0.00064334046,0.1366428,0.0006511037,0.00028194737,0.81466293,0.004342915,0.03122533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004532335,0.000035753987,0.058873363,0.0006515186,0.000083091196,0.00035409007,0.20748396,0.0024555495,0.00088337454,0.11782278,0.61115193,0.00015926397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99529064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99770266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17463371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17463371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23973791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95730793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257020633","doi":"","title":"The Celebration of Same-Sex Marriage","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Homosexuality; Compassion; Politics; State (computer science); Sociology; Gender studies; Gender equality; Same sex; Introspection; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.022228375124676618,"score_gpt":0.2893949064207124,"score_spread":0.2671665312960358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257020633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52580243,0.008398981,0.0014107688,0.07451857,0.0012853376,0.00001147066,0.000030777104,0.000027447779,0.38851425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877251,0.0012774597,0.00011030211,0.0017032877,0.00020992497,0.0000035486732,0.0000053132717,0.0000073970223,0.008957593],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995421,0.0028033215,0.000084475105,0.00025726488,0.00085926394,0.0005746663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963741,0.0013736367,0.00070498383,0.00021329625,0.00033139976,0.0010025996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004048485,0.00014073445,0.00027409644,0.0007306318,0.01384514,0.0044091083,0.00056829496,0.001500367,0.003894995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007901279,0.00019336597,0.00013022688,0.00054781337,0.019139804,0.00397397,0.006983046,0.0034247767,0.00031491887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004318062,0.00003765361,0.005629155,0.000058369023,0.000007791172,0.00053009664,0.5608287,0.000043820146,0.00035932325,0.3971724,0.009742957,0.025546579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000110034525,0.00010224211,0.0127355885,0.00035325642,0.00001574309,0.0015924975,0.4159271,0.00015546172,0.00075523823,0.039001387,0.52930593,0.000044554978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010949018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014485026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01384514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027092153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018430348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021770597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257707695","doi":"10.7202/1057482ar","title":"Les origines intellectuelles et les caractéristiques institutionnelles et axiologiques du droit matrimonial occidental moderne","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025711727016912198,"score_gpt":0.3003547611711174,"score_spread":0.2746430341542052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257707695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3625589,0.009744958,0.0009817869,0.008110815,0.00015700255,0.000017943363,0.00013624027,0.000060129543,0.6182323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9534196,0.0016372324,0.00036563395,0.0002693528,0.00006908685,0.000012961712,0.00004162711,0.000019460693,0.04416508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938893,0.0001325386,0.000013503526,0.00008025728,0.00014143484,0.00024341875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952626,0.00009083169,0.00011835269,0.00005355008,0.00010901799,0.0001020736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008305958,0.000408458,0.00019973141,0.0014375452,0.0048774974,0.0049960157,0.00039471823,0.00061588205,0.0076956726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011833203,0.0001721945,0.00016899273,0.0019958566,0.012910169,0.0013239628,0.001785745,0.0014557448,0.0009337132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014958787,0.000028890861,0.0115503855,0.00022184108,0.000024680387,0.0005922485,0.104201645,0.00027246328,0.0013180635,0.8320661,0.0046598217,0.04491431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035230496,0.00011056062,0.14961424,0.00062356435,0.000046641235,0.00065484614,0.052707408,0.00024868952,0.0014682671,0.04676216,0.74764,0.0000883931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09306684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16951744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09306684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011806421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004453609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18505025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257961456","doi":"10.21991/c9h08n","title":"ABORIGINAL SELF-DETERMINATION WITHIN CANADA: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Political science; International law; International human rights law; Self-determination","score_opus":0.031012645982357485,"score_gpt":0.3012560663024693,"score_spread":0.27024342032011184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257961456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3554169,0.12607738,0.0020899358,0.23843254,0.0014178937,0.00014559552,0.0011618519,0.00015079544,0.2751071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8930863,0.046848062,0.0023373368,0.015591409,0.0003359945,0.000062151674,0.0004190909,0.0000790538,0.04124053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935622,0.0005409149,0.00018767719,0.0006092153,0.0022994683,0.0028004735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98208976,0.0032378745,0.0012524328,0.00026415207,0.007815723,0.005339946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005024195,0.0003546819,0.00076944765,0.005179941,0.023691356,0.0184005,0.0031822883,0.0033271,0.010758076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010457785,0.00045036324,0.00064513285,0.012156975,0.013502729,0.0036969902,0.004724807,0.00685328,0.00028209592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016282786,0.00022767403,0.04385404,0.0011331212,0.00011785367,0.0011771983,0.118444145,0.0014395013,0.0008937798,0.5533577,0.07019602,0.20899619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003856387,0.00006518415,0.18614252,0.0018906655,0.00013576644,0.00037577594,0.12119179,0.0012637819,0.00060067116,0.016748492,0.67126584,0.00028098456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21487048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21487048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3724274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9106389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258308187","doi":"","title":"Law Deans, Legal Coercion and the Freedoms of Association and Religion in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Coercion (linguistics); Diversity (politics); Civil law (Civil law); Comparative law; Morality; Constitutional law; Liberalism; Perspective (graphical); Public law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0047230315811823435,"score_gpt":0.22289019848545497,"score_spread":0.21816716690427262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258308187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6351833,0.006413609,0.0006460888,0.06988755,0.00028151844,0.00008632849,0.00048374242,0.000031225878,0.28698665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820676,0.0012774338,0.00015987479,0.0018891224,0.000021996279,0.00001022172,0.00004367758,0.000007811149,0.014522295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99622995,0.00032678357,0.00006605558,0.00023538752,0.0011449471,0.0019969004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934877,0.0013184273,0.0005829859,0.000111940106,0.0015940241,0.0029049597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020963876,0.00018982615,0.00043711872,0.0019904682,0.030608494,0.00765441,0.0012619284,0.0019223299,0.0069159647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008747414,0.0002955119,0.00025108838,0.0035504252,0.01550433,0.0019243538,0.003856206,0.0028778992,0.00019027249],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007465548,0.00006827957,0.06086589,0.00012602194,0.000027153,0.00052490836,0.064374864,0.00073839363,0.00039034957,0.81550086,0.031012004,0.026296785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009602979,0.00004401909,0.27481234,0.0006134441,0.00010660004,0.0003471363,0.16963637,0.0020821872,0.00061052036,0.06958256,0.48183778,0.00023096602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8214276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1785724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27728683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9527396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258663494","doi":"","title":"Developments in Family Law: The 1998-1999 Term","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Appeal; Family law; Obligation; Majority opinion; Precedent; CONTEST; Common law","score_opus":0.036698215915954874,"score_gpt":0.26712373934833644,"score_spread":0.23042552343238157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258663494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045931168,0.10206846,0.0010327641,0.20551232,0.0027993768,0.00009645107,0.00061483454,0.00004817945,0.6418964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61350477,0.053082142,0.0016005646,0.084636115,0.0019591684,0.00021871188,0.0005595319,0.00005428398,0.24438469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967372,0.0004105573,0.00013413394,0.00033607808,0.0014420887,0.0009399269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978927,0.00047638468,0.00022417706,0.00007232602,0.0007294728,0.00060493586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031885915,0.00027278534,0.00023837869,0.0016518672,0.015224253,0.0082408395,0.0016550394,0.0067236107,0.003917385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061218585,0.00039913453,0.00026646847,0.0024155304,0.013703346,0.0037810365,0.0031462633,0.0055127107,0.0005312615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023206714,0.000039580453,0.0018570144,0.000059952567,0.0000030387273,0.0005318625,0.014341347,0.00008484439,0.00021689944,0.86712426,0.092352234,0.023365768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000087342705,0.000013797967,0.0070247967,0.00022914035,0.00000309838,0.00021362772,0.0035644781,0.000037271748,0.00006961739,0.006893131,0.98192936,0.000012949128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9040857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9310401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1003254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1003254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055829212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7279151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258726175","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review as a Limit to Indigenous Self-Governance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Judicial review; Standard of review; Adjudication; Deference; Political science; Judicial deference; Administrative law; Corporate governance; Law; Rule of law; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.02583393593041864,"score_gpt":0.35951647296149847,"score_spread":0.3336825370310798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258726175","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022426848,0.9447137,0.0016138855,0.008969174,0.00048541508,0.000034550234,0.000014665082,0.000012003082,0.041913874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16153687,0.8218098,0.0021720082,0.007540447,0.0016902095,0.00009912803,0.00003958451,0.000013478537,0.0050984006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809497,0.008927866,0.001161734,0.0013178277,0.006798371,0.00084446964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9676701,0.024672223,0.0023404127,0.00092533254,0.0040419195,0.0003499553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011736927,0.00025261845,0.0009994226,0.0024458822,0.0016611479,0.0045029796,0.0018306753,0.0037628443,0.002215231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029759342,0.00039632502,0.0006107454,0.0025828995,0.007623046,0.0033119016,0.0017127849,0.0036437027,0.00035623802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036221816,0.00005128215,0.0011977701,0.010453231,0.00013969236,0.00029200912,0.00222361,0.0008141768,0.00049368216,0.61301595,0.021883277,0.3493991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038082308,0.00011735368,0.0039377655,0.019816678,0.00021201221,0.0008468479,0.00085982704,0.00028739878,0.00065161526,0.05791872,0.9152616,0.0000519816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023941614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031130567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023941614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005287575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015518991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06207156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258761409","doi":"","title":"Developments in Family Law: The 2000-2001 Term","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Family law; Supreme court; Political science; Child support; Common law; Constitutional law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02985694181921984,"score_gpt":0.29399864253572255,"score_spread":0.2641417007165027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258761409","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014405036,0.10910591,0.0012967989,0.22381179,0.005737682,0.000086100765,0.00032189392,0.00003623386,0.6451985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32093585,0.065479934,0.0022234893,0.2572019,0.005734794,0.0003678246,0.000475177,0.00010268464,0.34747827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99500704,0.0010529596,0.00028729273,0.0008664905,0.0017324687,0.0010537864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99733764,0.0010391955,0.00027302676,0.00015658121,0.0006161097,0.0005774671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060930206,0.0005821824,0.0004211202,0.0021765977,0.017733717,0.012749334,0.001968864,0.017816992,0.0068914522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009401357,0.00067399844,0.0005662622,0.0027808878,0.020330416,0.009190058,0.005670263,0.0136071835,0.0011669925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009497514,0.000037917696,0.00051743834,0.000043172324,0.000002469125,0.000246917,0.0048301583,0.000095740805,0.00007755286,0.92045397,0.06260089,0.011084241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007042105,0.000017173597,0.001959863,0.0004999864,0.0000037431844,0.00022365223,0.0016223757,0.00006960643,0.000045293335,0.022934362,0.9725983,0.000018541909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5244347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55415046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5244347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.066111706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039072365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95673203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259093601","doi":"","title":"The Bride Wore Pink. . . to the Property (Relationships) Legislation Amendment Act 1999","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Legislation; Law; State (computer science); Property (philosophy); Political science; Amendment","score_opus":0.0677563960428675,"score_gpt":0.3233968863395125,"score_spread":0.25564049029664504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259093601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021324754,0.0015895767,0.0022330785,0.04433223,0.0017099105,0.000372151,0.001703422,0.00015510604,0.92657995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.069477126,0.0007750843,0.0014727219,0.03322001,0.00015634402,0.00024097407,0.0005234771,0.00006504113,0.8940693],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995786,0.00061502855,0.00018163104,0.00034325445,0.0018530624,0.0012210668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738127,0.00069748115,0.00017720195,0.0002760139,0.0011373272,0.00033069524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026423843,0.00032728398,0.00042462934,0.0006717437,0.007891827,0.0044091023,0.0013967368,0.0075317454,0.034713175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010608753,0.0005613265,0.00055393187,0.0008710021,0.0026760215,0.0014589605,0.0032372016,0.006564529,0.010977299],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059400016,0.000082009174,0.0023913567,0.00010758355,0.000010011534,0.0006297193,0.010209438,0.00010923085,0.0013829286,0.33827642,0.6123675,0.034374394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010846527,0.000025138948,0.005199823,0.00013268644,0.000008036399,0.000104094746,0.0013948819,0.00005975156,0.0002740147,0.0021957655,0.99057466,0.000020481428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3582876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54842126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3582876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006523578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017434184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71240425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259465928","doi":"","title":"Autonomous from the Start: Single Mothers by Choice in the Canadian Legal System","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Independence (probability theory); Family law; Resistance (ecology); Single mothers; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.01779563686818581,"score_gpt":0.2612788354287886,"score_spread":0.2434831985606028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259465928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78052235,0.00419995,0.00090299797,0.09508327,0.00037966276,0.00014767153,0.00017130737,0.000027308151,0.11856545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834765,0.001254031,0.00036312346,0.005532495,0.000032777836,0.000019449048,0.00002378057,0.000011057074,0.009286735],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98866105,0.0014633711,0.00022632485,0.0010377389,0.0036767852,0.0049347295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98966146,0.00315563,0.0009742841,0.00037355747,0.0023498337,0.0034852775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00747378,0.00029720433,0.00048078847,0.0015564975,0.043369886,0.007564068,0.0026508651,0.0040301783,0.0049323724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01747997,0.00043967212,0.00034588555,0.0023799764,0.018227212,0.0021682181,0.006630693,0.0050437315,0.00019443512],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007913558,0.00009138083,0.0495927,0.00011692079,0.000024820007,0.0046903435,0.6320664,0.00032476202,0.0010853617,0.2274612,0.027884498,0.056582414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053129836,0.00007851227,0.07690468,0.0005607622,0.000051619794,0.001328951,0.62011147,0.0010364001,0.00070320745,0.017262671,0.28167245,0.00023614959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99673885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13336912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13336912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1854396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9676652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259563497","doi":"","title":"Abortion, Judicial Activism and Constitutional Crossroads","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Popular sovereignty; Sovereignty; Law; Charter; Deference; Parliamentary sovereignty; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01346927211545076,"score_gpt":0.3040305800606453,"score_spread":0.2905613079451946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259563497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046999343,0.038455356,0.0077730883,0.09501085,0.0010055032,0.00006195591,0.00007974635,0.00005444872,0.8105598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9408122,0.006944742,0.0013296552,0.019195009,0.0009834396,0.00013257304,0.00007770109,0.00004813398,0.030476626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98555607,0.005364027,0.00046530063,0.0030450318,0.0023935765,0.0031759886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891242,0.008184137,0.00055087724,0.0007213775,0.0008957163,0.00052378024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012499655,0.00032598918,0.0006862532,0.0022374175,0.016178643,0.016549505,0.0017299025,0.01043546,0.0075307614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015291456,0.0007396787,0.0006250029,0.0020381904,0.05580113,0.009962248,0.011716336,0.018045023,0.00040323084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031385598,0.0000050168055,0.00005900425,0.000010796637,0.0000015975909,0.000030691033,0.0016711781,0.000027309983,0.00003279818,0.9954905,0.00089674955,0.0017712439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058700247,0.000028166565,0.0010898084,0.0004533255,0.000020923193,0.00010463832,0.0034978006,0.00023557771,0.00060672103,0.77317965,0.22069152,0.000033146982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042300776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048254438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042300776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0171899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011817168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124722004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259642444","doi":"","title":"The Application of the Canadian Charter in the Health Care Context","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Scrutiny; Health care; Political science; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Law; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.013463692102245808,"score_gpt":0.3029314425865334,"score_spread":0.2894677504842876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259642444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031020027,0.008930775,0.008147348,0.239921,0.0018084364,0.00013494749,0.00029208348,0.000061590035,0.7096838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90503067,0.006142328,0.008387,0.046272557,0.0005663533,0.00012661105,0.0001223577,0.00006546413,0.033286706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97052765,0.0070085535,0.00065094186,0.0026269848,0.011968585,0.0072173155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97942907,0.009119274,0.0010634328,0.0011709329,0.0072478885,0.0019693903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015601118,0.00046169956,0.0006554237,0.0030528854,0.039117217,0.015365068,0.0027075848,0.006950654,0.0048685283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036652796,0.00062843383,0.0007207779,0.004498032,0.0413948,0.0059761675,0.008130782,0.0115222335,0.0003129534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071469503,0.000003471267,0.00076711207,0.000020867126,0.0000033439246,0.0001437583,0.008020102,0.00020435038,0.00006382704,0.96868134,0.015960027,0.0061246706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004796473,0.000031704174,0.012277704,0.0009248694,0.000052300562,0.00031989923,0.027362395,0.0019978418,0.0004241021,0.3123633,0.6439378,0.00026009284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9817671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9894823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86287236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13712764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2363669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99493533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259646108","doi":"","title":"Inclusive Interpretations: Social and Economic Rights and the Canadian Charter","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; International human rights law; Interpretation (philosophy); Legitimacy; Law; Fundamental rights; Right to property; Social rights; Charter; Reservation of rights; Mandate; Linguistic rights; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.006592386414397481,"score_gpt":0.27072668146459444,"score_spread":0.264134295050197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259646108","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09508862,0.004408219,0.004482543,0.05335938,0.000454753,0.00012203623,0.0002580326,0.00006490079,0.8417616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9035785,0.0024946004,0.0034297833,0.003522246,0.00007026539,0.000088717534,0.00009052171,0.00006439847,0.08666096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99140054,0.0014128715,0.00012933208,0.0005458639,0.003172605,0.0033387775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960538,0.0014377678,0.000228816,0.00022230865,0.0013037127,0.00075353147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035692353,0.0008105074,0.00070095394,0.0031224994,0.04765002,0.018173095,0.0029430813,0.0047814944,0.0073480178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070074215,0.00045121426,0.0006934858,0.0060698395,0.04250199,0.0047760927,0.0073920614,0.006196169,0.00035831536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009783241,0.000009087547,0.0006536517,0.00002333852,0.0000027266155,0.00035238452,0.022585621,0.00039205997,0.00005154996,0.96143204,0.007188839,0.0072988654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037586422,0.000019228635,0.006440037,0.0005043066,0.000041799212,0.00034710162,0.0964559,0.0021645725,0.00035243493,0.24602494,0.6474323,0.00017976374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9955455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75261766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24738233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29268834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8729298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259716125","doi":"","title":"National Responsibility and Systemic Racism in Criminal Sentencing: The Case of R. v. Hamilton","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Racism; Political science; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Sociology; History","score_opus":0.026432736139632127,"score_gpt":0.3271622273841743,"score_spread":0.3007294912445421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259716125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42901543,0.004928118,0.0026702685,0.14953351,0.00067662797,0.00037832573,0.000107679734,0.00009037602,0.41259965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9408909,0.0015463929,0.00096387824,0.028211437,0.00014411623,0.00010182034,0.00001906787,0.000024542096,0.028097713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99227023,0.0016658517,0.00015708235,0.000685736,0.0015648495,0.0036562667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773836,0.00087106106,0.00018838591,0.00010273208,0.00043288054,0.00066659175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037153014,0.00037031723,0.0004917924,0.00081497256,0.037687577,0.0061671003,0.002205835,0.012043783,0.0025038086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007985354,0.0008079827,0.000750849,0.000944055,0.015325786,0.0020223544,0.0054204,0.013318241,0.00024724065],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000751228,0.00011825489,0.00928563,0.00011227241,0.000057432724,0.017415687,0.12282934,0.0009335117,0.0013053976,0.76271784,0.064113416,0.021036023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028786273,0.0003319953,0.044185773,0.001335663,0.0006375353,0.010541306,0.21648937,0.0044835,0.0029773596,0.16037236,0.5574347,0.0009225559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8895238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95844656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110476196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046421777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06371414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33681518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260143363","doi":"","title":"Blais et Powley : les doctrines des droits aborigènes des métis sous la loupe (The Blais and Powley Cases: Métis Aboriginal Rights Doctrines Examined)","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Metis; Supreme court; Humanities; Ethnology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.014926748500194141,"score_gpt":0.30707884266304253,"score_spread":0.2921520941628484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260143363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17045896,0.00951597,0.0019024281,0.04873736,0.00033376747,0.00010785711,0.000072398034,0.000016513313,0.7688548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8958988,0.0019473736,0.00062549923,0.006810044,0.00012751893,0.00007503432,0.000017472816,0.000009538278,0.094488695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979838,0.0004494309,0.000048071557,0.00026042762,0.0005336943,0.00072458794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987074,0.0006781682,0.00015511237,0.00006443092,0.00024161262,0.00015329503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002324415,0.00028889193,0.00026523106,0.0008761445,0.016349373,0.005156181,0.0012459251,0.0055677486,0.0043972707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035671499,0.000376959,0.0003191954,0.0009741074,0.020950364,0.0031436083,0.0037185927,0.007026841,0.00031604344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075665453,0.000005301402,0.0005856689,0.000025077885,0.000002210948,0.0005074353,0.022438288,0.000045902805,0.00014881094,0.9693607,0.0040627397,0.0028102687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006998604,0.00009438772,0.013570469,0.0008964021,0.000052813524,0.0016376534,0.1027913,0.0005738795,0.0014486517,0.24739495,0.6313657,0.00010380263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5115422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6741465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4884578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016240623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01746259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9826689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260525329","doi":"","title":"Rights Based Strategies to Address Homelessness and Poverty in Canada: The Charter Framework","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Charter; Political science; Public administration; Economic growth; Development economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.00931024944145643,"score_gpt":0.2598482252119281,"score_spread":0.25053797577047165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260525329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09881813,0.0060865427,0.013913062,0.33403873,0.0010249714,0.00069092767,0.00048765272,0.00018221626,0.54475766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92748094,0.0030974282,0.0076394314,0.01307268,0.00021794125,0.00026108272,0.00010408671,0.000079399375,0.048047096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855924,0.003370362,0.0002517278,0.00073961867,0.003529506,0.006516303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98747975,0.0034562866,0.0008570126,0.0005370702,0.0036980445,0.0039718365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011315082,0.00070189073,0.0008460182,0.004201765,0.02446876,0.017063167,0.005233439,0.007225047,0.0078177005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021637842,0.0004857104,0.00068014656,0.0032903496,0.030178308,0.006084289,0.0076410347,0.0076353345,0.00027565652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020647345,0.00008609488,0.0033400555,0.00007529192,0.000014661882,0.00020517375,0.01118882,0.001415796,0.000075835196,0.9362203,0.02081686,0.026540572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019792876,0.00012785044,0.029421119,0.0017817004,0.00016480258,0.00031782757,0.07469657,0.008999641,0.00065724616,0.5008286,0.38252425,0.00028242593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9846793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99060506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13160345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13160345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3841659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9548543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260864533","doi":"","title":"Evolution of Yukon's Aboriginal Law and the Goal of Reconciliation: A 360 Degree Perspective","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Degree (music); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.011509005557719033,"score_gpt":0.2911508909931334,"score_spread":0.27964188543541435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260864533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75054616,0.00046058407,0.0020841572,0.004508641,0.000037778354,0.00003340449,0.0000619989,0.000021961127,0.24224535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99725705,0.00005900291,0.00032251395,0.000051437688,0.0000010067745,0.0000025380475,0.000010390693,0.000005252356,0.0022908181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866223,0.00044897918,0.000042555283,0.00019973384,0.00016114583,0.0004853229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837863,0.00033953463,0.00020948805,0.000225432,0.0005283613,0.00031861058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019169196,0.0001450386,0.0001986909,0.001026499,0.0059238314,0.005295102,0.0008396415,0.0015152055,0.004008669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036207358,0.0002093818,0.00016506418,0.0016579311,0.011366953,0.0027018304,0.0033367344,0.001728152,0.00017451738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006851645,0.000043327414,0.0140037,0.000044363103,0.00001678304,0.00049587066,0.11130088,0.001203809,0.00087594386,0.8532689,0.0010532801,0.017624658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035424542,0.00019764405,0.14603034,0.00020047877,0.00006603348,0.00082414545,0.34490538,0.0046791984,0.0015852131,0.33867383,0.16268626,0.000116064126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12154695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17543678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8784531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014752582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012671278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24167895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260998728","doi":"","title":"A New Subtlety in Judicial Supremacy: Review of the 2003-2004 Constitutional Cases","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Parliament; Legitimacy; Constitution; Law of the case; Politics; High Court; Court of record; Margin of appreciation; Deference; Judicial review; Original jurisdiction; Fundamental rights; Human rights","score_opus":0.020062741181044154,"score_gpt":0.3097946944180742,"score_spread":0.28973195323703005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260998728","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06824103,0.6943338,0.001303093,0.08112367,0.002908176,0.00026021784,0.001777088,0.000060932314,0.14999199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45634344,0.47931287,0.0022730615,0.036246393,0.0027912578,0.00019401294,0.0014106521,0.0001188945,0.021309365],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885578,0.0022650063,0.0014460566,0.000988332,0.0053815087,0.00136126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9406085,0.038429655,0.005263815,0.0013436168,0.013469816,0.00088461506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015735203,0.000270756,0.0006760735,0.016004903,0.003966874,0.00823817,0.0020818391,0.0027440013,0.0025842537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04842071,0.0006155575,0.00075777044,0.023495512,0.0067577544,0.003343997,0.0014851417,0.0026887641,0.0005076269],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023767965,0.00017764038,0.02720644,0.011948726,0.0002483835,0.0047057252,0.026040748,0.0015138737,0.002820319,0.28747705,0.28201577,0.35560763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024126944,0.000058594407,0.0686402,0.008100802,0.00018808559,0.000910475,0.010588672,0.00024002886,0.00086141634,0.0064765536,0.9038383,0.00007291315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34668633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66121536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34668633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03304093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042374197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6893368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262016348","doi":"","title":"The Puzzle of Interlocking Power Hierarchies: Sharing the Pieces of Jurisdictional Authority","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Law and economics; Multiculturalism; Citizenship; Political science; Politics; Jurisdiction; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.01294857069043029,"score_gpt":0.2937266258044696,"score_spread":0.2807780551140393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262016348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21844013,0.0072959564,0.1566468,0.11343547,0.0007405534,0.00010117981,0.00010395943,0.00027920352,0.50295675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858847,0.00067363406,0.0046131373,0.0018540527,0.00021399319,0.00005140217,0.000018661818,0.0000585888,0.0066317553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908765,0.00439774,0.00025967608,0.0013987261,0.0018439704,0.0012233477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99067676,0.0044239806,0.00074585434,0.002216373,0.00080384855,0.0011330672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010419715,0.00042302613,0.00094453816,0.0019958084,0.01056008,0.013832731,0.0028802948,0.0040329606,0.0062356014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017241023,0.00069912424,0.00086315826,0.0017388825,0.08210393,0.025978845,0.0140158385,0.006025952,0.0006947231],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012936629,0.000005313138,0.00025947214,0.000012741082,0.000006968619,0.000057576213,0.012743952,0.00024410884,0.00010633281,0.9802624,0.0007302542,0.0055580405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018546792,0.000013384922,0.00030813282,0.000052956773,0.000009071396,0.000049988736,0.0044257697,0.00055717403,0.0000773592,0.9746041,0.019867927,0.000015671827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0085357595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005762836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013832731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005819425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005489894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05510539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262701805","doi":"10.59962/9780774856010-016","title":"Dignity, Equality, and Second Generation Rights","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Political science; Jurisprudence; Social equality; Legislation; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.05074252311571753,"score_gpt":0.24354064730427483,"score_spread":0.1927981241885573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262701805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04700265,0.0062397285,0.013326833,0.08128139,0.00057491456,0.00009139535,0.000113985385,0.000047201116,0.8513219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91469663,0.0015439773,0.003819781,0.012139215,0.0002277473,0.000078521734,0.00005026071,0.000023772925,0.06741999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99366707,0.0015792481,0.00014382585,0.0005937521,0.0020610897,0.0019550251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983789,0.0006305634,0.00015170904,0.0001988069,0.00034296216,0.00029695258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044887275,0.00044772623,0.00040441498,0.0015335936,0.009807812,0.010185866,0.001749572,0.0065332795,0.004795456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045021097,0.00026612723,0.0005417593,0.001087966,0.060890447,0.0051629506,0.0063656694,0.0062851286,0.0003094595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011709416,0.0000023989621,0.00008564178,0.0000033065444,4.533797e-7,0.000021371441,0.0012612169,0.00003004389,0.000020827314,0.9967943,0.0007342798,0.0010449531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014368878,0.000024947954,0.0016952504,0.0001412005,0.0000062607787,0.00012623606,0.0035485276,0.0004828204,0.0002544189,0.8551855,0.13849191,0.000028495482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3906429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4366284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3906429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030947834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02357323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7767382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262938555","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004264","title":"The Religious Beliefs of Tort Victims: Religious Thin Skulls or Failures of Mitigation?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Argument (complex analysis); Tort; Religious freedom; Witness; Law; Accident (philosophy); Psychology; Forensic engineering; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Medicine; Engineering; Philosophy; Liability; Epistemology","score_opus":0.015367179004416462,"score_gpt":0.3090928702814286,"score_spread":0.29372569127701215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262938555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84746665,0.0024623822,0.00095745496,0.094791666,0.00024944748,0.000053613836,0.00003172685,0.000010216759,0.05397696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99499655,0.00047610115,0.000113271635,0.0037769747,0.00004614172,0.0000069268212,0.00000425177,0.0000022909837,0.00057737384],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966972,0.0015556514,0.000095899864,0.00017238173,0.00065285276,0.000826036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934835,0.002782781,0.0018947981,0.0005660198,0.0005802413,0.0006927576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004820007,0.000329526,0.00048884144,0.0016978913,0.0077950796,0.0049344366,0.0017667767,0.004466628,0.0029469584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020064024,0.00037072413,0.0003289554,0.0011542015,0.04578174,0.0064453296,0.0045507923,0.005368577,0.0001936765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050384566,0.00013643916,0.025237622,0.00007490944,0.000023567274,0.001144022,0.73195326,0.000047001984,0.00024125457,0.22157592,0.003563465,0.015952244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032891552,0.00005818355,0.02551464,0.00036476686,0.0000350539,0.0012495434,0.9025614,0.00021878081,0.0002388414,0.05335842,0.01631873,0.000048790436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059646837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06636948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94035316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044697314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005035562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118599296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263805740","doi":"","title":"Protecting the Right to Privacy when Examining Issues Affecting the life and Ministry of Clerics and Religious","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia canonica","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Christian ministry; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03202987271166426,"score_gpt":0.31359575638326387,"score_spread":0.2815658836715996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263805740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27790174,0.01856064,0.01795059,0.112767816,0.0017298774,0.0014534522,0.0008668537,0.000089941575,0.5686791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92239493,0.0058095623,0.009417354,0.024136681,0.0004633797,0.000862402,0.00013672863,0.000055971206,0.03672308],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9589009,0.0302552,0.001408413,0.0010303808,0.0045639356,0.0038411943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9449725,0.038460672,0.004863726,0.0042930534,0.0057365815,0.0016734052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024981929,0.00038792685,0.0005462585,0.0025051201,0.011544941,0.013028048,0.0017670484,0.0059568402,0.010326919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07857849,0.00039430847,0.0005599873,0.0027194887,0.014417906,0.008549285,0.005022072,0.005162534,0.0013569406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015301917,0.0001215507,0.040251754,0.00087596086,0.000047704416,0.0026402955,0.44103646,0.00027370316,0.0011950901,0.35320517,0.03932845,0.12087089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017335078,0.00013338358,0.041872308,0.0028252292,0.000047704736,0.0016896516,0.47364664,0.000295394,0.0021321934,0.062584095,0.4146739,0.00008214679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038168445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06683708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038168445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006153403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017476104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13211864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264166610","doi":"","title":"Uncertainty and Indecision in the Legal Regulation of Children: The Albertan Experience","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Ambivalence; Legislature; Political science; Context (archaeology); Common law; Law; Economic Justice; Narrative; Test (biology); Perception; Welfare; Psychology; Social psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.01211639601987992,"score_gpt":0.3042471047610696,"score_spread":0.2921307087411897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264166610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63663167,0.008330248,0.0017945034,0.06338142,0.00041609156,0.00006376888,0.0000760835,0.000042624513,0.28926364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97606,0.0019676217,0.0004237385,0.0045457664,0.000039139784,0.000025774661,0.000019241894,0.00002181767,0.016897023],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98428714,0.0046730894,0.0002986613,0.001060938,0.004692751,0.004987396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922667,0.004032687,0.0006126606,0.0002829806,0.0012089375,0.0015961067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011786721,0.00036108695,0.0007985899,0.0011829523,0.048940063,0.014687753,0.0033107323,0.005417637,0.0036986577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010661198,0.00080084556,0.00043084656,0.0022101756,0.07308405,0.0041956264,0.010879562,0.011524933,0.00022894502],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016866597,0.000018927778,0.0034331684,0.000033668002,0.0000056822337,0.0014473277,0.828905,0.00017218587,0.0001963398,0.15592928,0.0035454982,0.0062960275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010151298,0.000033829336,0.008299602,0.00034049663,0.000016724982,0.0009177334,0.7359078,0.00018232137,0.00024864305,0.013992541,0.23995064,0.00009943838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9425543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95753425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10756137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10756137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09748481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.780416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265349050","doi":"","title":"Reproductive Choice in Canadian Courts: An Evidence-Based Call for a Move to Relational Autonomy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Harm; Norm (philosophy); Politics; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.03793885685121873,"score_gpt":0.33635547178888564,"score_spread":0.2984166149376669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265349050","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019545177,0.020849505,0.0025398494,0.9203517,0.0011353487,0.00008570712,0.00015313577,0.000030864157,0.035308834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75100917,0.03755136,0.014017934,0.18969508,0.0017657846,0.00015792898,0.00025847703,0.000052470645,0.005491828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9356415,0.020335492,0.004872368,0.0047266195,0.02704759,0.007376523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63552046,0.22606008,0.019503886,0.01115641,0.0884135,0.019345684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12267272,0.00055743335,0.0016117563,0.007731473,0.018183025,0.020489002,0.0090526845,0.020903382,0.0062610344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29282266,0.001101787,0.0015118343,0.009396678,0.03535297,0.019557344,0.011514178,0.02310551,0.00030288676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001708294,0.00011890642,0.0230108,0.0020381582,0.00019758585,0.0011409287,0.035157938,0.0014624855,0.00034152932,0.70777225,0.078981526,0.14960717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043188359,0.00019427628,0.060734652,0.023246594,0.0005912975,0.0007427482,0.037076466,0.0036824094,0.0010535085,0.40306422,0.4682961,0.0008858887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9559431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97721463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13767108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13767108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35299867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265808246","doi":"10.1080/17521483.2010.11423777","title":"Lord Atkin's Opinion in <i>Donoghue v Stevenson</i> : Perspectives from Biblical Hermeneutics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Humanities","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Hermeneutics; Law; Philosophy; Theology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.0441147463482948,"score_gpt":0.30852626711882497,"score_spread":0.26441152077053015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265808246","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010109412,0.013503648,0.001792082,0.8807061,0.0069113392,0.00003282989,0.00006693211,0.000036913785,0.086840734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2507237,0.004879358,0.0014262806,0.68289584,0.0034198982,0.00010929599,0.000025696343,0.000067604255,0.05645233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909322,0.0034977894,0.0005149155,0.0012762557,0.0026239238,0.0011548772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98950505,0.008036018,0.00048622294,0.00019526723,0.0013380424,0.00043949127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076280683,0.0003559768,0.0008433215,0.0012045542,0.011292167,0.00803965,0.0030993624,0.026069412,0.0032966956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01787581,0.0004969832,0.00087955093,0.0015074952,0.022017034,0.0066226544,0.0042841644,0.024205966,0.00063181703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033366352,0.00001048198,0.0002475245,0.00015544484,0.000011175816,0.00052128837,0.010844086,0.00008817412,0.00031326796,0.85018593,0.1335336,0.0040557506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028417626,0.000037042126,0.0010160496,0.00073594775,0.000042262745,0.0005077998,0.012807291,0.00021064775,0.00097596215,0.14494936,0.8385617,0.00012750468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066583365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10706004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066583365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0093873385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008648924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13239163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265918590","doi":"","title":"Federalism and Pregnancy Benefits: Dividing Women","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Federalism; Political science; Law; Legislation; Politics","score_opus":0.018621485966484108,"score_gpt":0.29047708947598705,"score_spread":0.27185560350950294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265918590","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065508105,0.01500824,0.0064852834,0.21798256,0.0012248409,0.000061029143,0.00006417985,0.00004151238,0.69362426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.906912,0.00485519,0.0008917907,0.044375945,0.0005535845,0.000047468664,0.000019757297,0.000016670983,0.042327665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955479,0.0013210032,0.00009657723,0.00038245786,0.0010820845,0.0015699618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980096,0.0011658308,0.00019024624,0.000112834394,0.00034667153,0.00017478166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003077243,0.0001895686,0.00023898903,0.00055700843,0.009994529,0.0055739437,0.0010365996,0.005281527,0.0025678498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005022029,0.00026002622,0.0004629885,0.0006371393,0.016582638,0.0023766127,0.0029129107,0.006288078,0.00016820291],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031787768,0.000004393784,0.00047015876,0.000006688631,0.000001755047,0.00006364537,0.002258494,0.0000545646,0.000041655665,0.99065197,0.0038737108,0.0025697404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042311538,0.000066768334,0.010673648,0.00067414535,0.0000667164,0.00049354864,0.01294943,0.0007224492,0.0008826631,0.3552132,0.6181474,0.00006776665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4522206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5779362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4522206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01661473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02182934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8991767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266116478","doi":"","title":"Critical Comparisons: The Supreme Court of Canada Dooms Section 15","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Plaintiff; Political science; Section (typography); Charter; Immigration; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.014170470897597895,"score_gpt":0.28498565594200975,"score_spread":0.2708151850444119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266116478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033339605,0.011684107,0.017845687,0.3069208,0.0046393666,0.00023177163,0.0005451815,0.00013917018,0.62465423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8116524,0.003425406,0.016789863,0.09942467,0.0016220936,0.0002258364,0.00022812508,0.00012856866,0.06650299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9711637,0.008470324,0.0009774627,0.0031417932,0.011643264,0.0046034437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98022974,0.009695532,0.00088856724,0.0009914036,0.0072074644,0.0009873495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023441024,0.00047371094,0.0007901004,0.0023506337,0.025046086,0.015773557,0.0034291022,0.009487456,0.0041324645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044591013,0.00046893136,0.0007890347,0.0031789732,0.032858558,0.008270546,0.0048895986,0.011524575,0.00028956225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006862089,0.0000022560114,0.00012935864,0.00001481783,0.0000033307683,0.000040612413,0.002082036,0.00005126204,0.00004206334,0.98036194,0.013995004,0.0032704242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048201517,0.000028860666,0.0023270373,0.0004798906,0.00004841505,0.000084592335,0.0064200386,0.00081632764,0.0005671153,0.5483378,0.44073272,0.000108971166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81336695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8734221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18663305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.087804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12081232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63706553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266419907","doi":"","title":"Unnatural Intents: Willing and Acting in a New Natural Law Theory Sexual Ethic","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Constitution; Autonomy; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Natural (archaeology); Law; Natural law; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036383147947679134,"score_gpt":0.30724781300391785,"score_spread":0.27086466505623874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266419907","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11256184,0.004377233,0.07259352,0.055038784,0.0004499373,0.00006545384,0.000048327118,0.00004370294,0.75482124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763558,0.0010406488,0.007714304,0.002391427,0.00022539092,0.000067048735,0.000027353324,0.000032244232,0.012145694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99643373,0.002283081,0.00009738656,0.0002784065,0.0006714996,0.000235909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995761,0.0025457062,0.00038007332,0.0005118071,0.00041062443,0.00039089518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054399767,0.00023958953,0.00033692663,0.0013785575,0.0028080936,0.005717891,0.0009573647,0.002066833,0.0028592832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005385339,0.00022771022,0.0004835019,0.0005720082,0.042049892,0.008732819,0.0039139274,0.004899283,0.00031121282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017520276,0.00000596638,0.00010586388,0.0000053840254,6.1126497e-7,0.000020712687,0.0026546658,0.000054405624,0.000020661786,0.9958413,0.00016485467,0.0011238795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061352366,0.000008546313,0.0002588181,0.000036735106,0.0000021892201,0.00007391646,0.0021599536,0.00046294884,0.00004761204,0.9803115,0.016625194,0.0000064412784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018406414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001598391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005717891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029305567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020743408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028769732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266724630","doi":"","title":"The Contribution to Private Law of Justice La Forest","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Private law; Political science; Public law","score_opus":0.015989414447934572,"score_gpt":0.2725423216316211,"score_spread":0.25655290718368656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266724630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056404665,0.009202985,0.001986932,0.28812018,0.0020060348,0.000030203264,0.00014550117,0.000055638673,0.6420478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8528567,0.0025564404,0.00097631814,0.03463239,0.0020007174,0.000022968885,0.00006772165,0.00005400652,0.10683282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888181,0.0025591166,0.00018635174,0.0010835157,0.0037214018,0.0036314777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815276,0.009663739,0.0010445163,0.0014527653,0.0036083008,0.0027031382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063232593,0.00021778891,0.00037633927,0.00132793,0.018667536,0.014499662,0.001238349,0.0065587573,0.0061570434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020561006,0.0003527544,0.00033681712,0.0012403606,0.016689876,0.0057624537,0.005630014,0.0076375394,0.0006827631],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025280615,0.000036567308,0.004710105,0.00004553176,0.000015149725,0.00046108014,0.0067833527,0.00017413041,0.0002068329,0.8462599,0.11608877,0.025193425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000140758475,0.000015052926,0.0078094974,0.00026406706,0.00003084383,0.00060860807,0.0058983453,0.00049539877,0.00035330484,0.15597974,0.8284822,0.000048854483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2586521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56673694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7413479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01615385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035418287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51429313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268469613","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2731","title":"Canadian Bijuralism At A Crossroad? The Impact Of Section 8.1 Of The Interpretation Act On Judicial Interpretation Of Federal Legislation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Judicial interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Section (typography); Common law; Supreme court; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.016204950788023396,"score_gpt":0.30857258504728,"score_spread":0.2923676342592566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268469613","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030696256,0.007845136,0.001873097,0.2895762,0.0018015855,0.00004950292,0.00017194677,0.00007808092,0.6679082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8133509,0.0056160796,0.0028989122,0.06959367,0.0004352104,0.000045549456,0.00012955345,0.00009206527,0.10783799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891677,0.002164657,0.00020692407,0.0010672968,0.0038983007,0.0034951556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925943,0.002066412,0.00036332142,0.00050576427,0.003591672,0.00087850954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071323984,0.00040235155,0.00051977305,0.0020354076,0.03183761,0.016081177,0.0026015083,0.006158914,0.009361801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016498564,0.0004731504,0.00051959004,0.0036054954,0.028045123,0.0053587905,0.0035597966,0.009799549,0.0006428889],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001401296,0.000008901736,0.0008515346,0.000028723676,0.0000070162787,0.00014675019,0.011785604,0.000065023254,0.00011110962,0.91949093,0.053299166,0.014191148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021904667,0.00002304159,0.0116919875,0.00051883544,0.0000537333,0.00017864666,0.03250884,0.00046709352,0.00055930385,0.10698614,0.8468429,0.00014755964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9829238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99170625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88671863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1132814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18175581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8219179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269071924","doi":"","title":"Foetal Rights and the Regulation of Abortion","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Abortion; Supreme court; Argument (complex analysis); Assertion; Reproductive rights; Human rights; Normative; Medicine","score_opus":0.011872409440713215,"score_gpt":0.26911393259655997,"score_spread":0.25724152315584675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269071924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027774274,0.013193712,0.014876199,0.06396893,0.0004735464,0.00005784977,0.00004979985,0.000033709028,0.87957203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9251406,0.006038159,0.0047452757,0.011524434,0.00054387265,0.00015954456,0.000039763847,0.000028351296,0.05177982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912238,0.004045353,0.00022546173,0.0007337969,0.0025395795,0.0012320547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940485,0.0036502895,0.00070680387,0.0004854953,0.0008452985,0.000263648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007759997,0.0002823981,0.00024784106,0.0011776233,0.00510911,0.0070372294,0.0015626693,0.00496431,0.0029534623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010804629,0.00024744653,0.00033240646,0.0008424039,0.048128773,0.0027570992,0.0043034744,0.0040201615,0.0003438539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011585078,0.0000017625857,0.00006723402,0.0000043762593,4.785357e-7,0.000016205408,0.0010145385,0.000041548596,0.000034890363,0.99740475,0.00024026597,0.0011727465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013977934,0.000017860208,0.0012833677,0.00021942102,0.000008511739,0.00012432144,0.0020903794,0.00025233705,0.00049716723,0.8296006,0.165872,0.000020187013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045853797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03139618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045853797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009521339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012010603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09117377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269197009","doi":"","title":"Rethinking the Sex Discrimination Act - Does Canada’s Experience Suggest We Should Give Our Judges a Greater Role?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Legislation; Legitimacy; Political science; Charter; Law; Power (physics); Politics","score_opus":0.024504832253950767,"score_gpt":0.30063863056275797,"score_spread":0.2761337983088072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269197009","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045481186,0.010009598,0.0011415805,0.8605791,0.004248285,0.000045641103,0.00016445022,0.000067332665,0.07826284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65997607,0.006252527,0.0025287813,0.27645284,0.0010934669,0.000038455837,0.000105042964,0.00011827364,0.053434607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97690046,0.0039150147,0.00054547325,0.0015569763,0.010055275,0.00702684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96500367,0.0085345255,0.001333566,0.0012262531,0.014692783,0.009209186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020115776,0.00042246337,0.000527587,0.0018346937,0.037552807,0.016482485,0.0039347042,0.010356499,0.0060311975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038096763,0.000423623,0.0007104293,0.0027720556,0.033962045,0.0057027107,0.0034754733,0.016501054,0.0007110843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008509399,0.00008024225,0.015240008,0.00021321076,0.00003599888,0.0008602832,0.08074316,0.00036215025,0.0015436925,0.47314322,0.33855653,0.08913639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038472375,0.000045823264,0.015276251,0.00039576314,0.000033766017,0.00019601826,0.044346288,0.0002711535,0.00068179873,0.01921007,0.919331,0.00017354632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97981226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9913249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1260438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1260438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28497657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91451603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269209814","doi":"","title":"Harmonizing Family Law's Identities","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Law; Harmonization; Political science; Municipal law; Private law; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Comparative law; Legislature; Domestic relations; Sociology","score_opus":0.051444160924537644,"score_gpt":0.28702093795182565,"score_spread":0.23557677702728802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269209814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22232549,0.0027709499,0.01771869,0.033675753,0.00033120008,0.00006293359,0.00004113336,0.00006247362,0.7230114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98272276,0.00053682644,0.0014261779,0.0010174282,0.00004184692,0.00002268933,0.000014393511,0.000015545844,0.014202338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922339,0.0044678673,0.00017727641,0.00077525026,0.0013206524,0.0010250747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971251,0.0011245377,0.00033628216,0.00038132715,0.00057549396,0.000457258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006983774,0.00020383508,0.00031169562,0.0018716146,0.016763713,0.009020701,0.0012952393,0.0021432114,0.0032209805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008716661,0.00019644095,0.0002605854,0.00095555204,0.034137897,0.007984398,0.0072335205,0.0029356298,0.0002831322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037350678,0.000013806218,0.0009545517,0.0000035870537,0.0000014899969,0.00014464482,0.11615813,0.00006180582,0.000057283767,0.87141913,0.0013113312,0.009870582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011939976,0.000037500875,0.0041305404,0.00018855688,0.0000099119825,0.0005044247,0.15799876,0.0007536983,0.00041948247,0.49519482,0.3407117,0.00003880624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044197954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03171361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044197954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013198193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009221674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09576005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270263469","doi":"","title":"Matters of Faith and Conscience: A Turning Point in the Taking of Oaths in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Oath; Faith; Law; Protestantism; Supreme court; Political science; Legal culture; Diversity (politics); Immigration; Sociology; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016930478786124695,"score_gpt":0.2727619995685596,"score_spread":0.25583152078243493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270263469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73056465,0.00619603,0.0006014457,0.09364782,0.00045665618,0.000058924954,0.0001308073,0.000028979699,0.16831468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98630536,0.0009223329,0.00015635474,0.0044224067,0.00002732833,0.0000068382424,0.00001684194,0.000015679785,0.008126932],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912224,0.0012628264,0.00018821575,0.0006233123,0.0022262095,0.0044770846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985999,0.0033234567,0.0006996584,0.00032926642,0.003237069,0.006411521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004151068,0.00026314272,0.0005385035,0.0024833751,0.06778444,0.014151535,0.0028557668,0.0046047415,0.0037699095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013738695,0.00043747886,0.0004277774,0.0036343595,0.041812997,0.0034882047,0.009138961,0.01048403,0.00016278063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009245366,0.000085212036,0.023638226,0.00010773824,0.000036556143,0.0024623915,0.5671579,0.00039592112,0.0006174435,0.34902376,0.023247477,0.033135023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052207313,0.00004147668,0.077968575,0.0005861611,0.00005213646,0.00050612236,0.6415501,0.00068731746,0.00049595267,0.030603716,0.24720164,0.00025453483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99653155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23676442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23676442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2608543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8852451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270347424","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2636513","title":"Illegitimacy in British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Ontario, and Nova Scotia: A Legislative History","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Legislature; Nova (rocket); Legislative history; Geography; Political science; Archaeology; History; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.025459100449071626,"score_gpt":0.2648203596074508,"score_spread":0.2393612591583792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270347424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6853691,0.012603406,0.0008294875,0.06397328,0.0007693793,0.0005644177,0.0045231916,0.00013170112,0.23123604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8150785,0.009210408,0.0012990683,0.021755736,0.000129702,0.00042436356,0.0013557163,0.00009896914,0.15064754],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607074,0.0002595635,0.00024335066,0.0002679539,0.0009761032,0.0021823477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865139,0.0027331153,0.0010986506,0.0003079252,0.0060287295,0.0033176471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028636802,0.00029419828,0.0004807321,0.0045751627,0.020305628,0.005474506,0.0033132932,0.0025452033,0.0073610786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0094977,0.0008776326,0.00041935817,0.007489671,0.006276043,0.0012569592,0.0035200918,0.0042762184,0.00043334038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003928531,0.00030516836,0.33070308,0.0013638224,0.00020012363,0.0040399316,0.1321533,0.0014796797,0.0040370813,0.21710132,0.17276709,0.13545662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004549338,0.000038321872,0.6044076,0.0011257782,0.00010061807,0.00023115346,0.061983753,0.0005012504,0.00082604395,0.0018597773,0.32873014,0.00015002403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14414014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14414014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2633498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99267614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270740614","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2196616","title":"Consultation Paper on Assisted Living in British Columbia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Assisted living; Geography; Medicine; Library science; Gerontology; Computer science","score_opus":0.015941946634757464,"score_gpt":0.28343043445676785,"score_spread":0.2674884878220104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270740614","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010134754,0.0053174472,0.00016438824,0.8787104,0.029972218,0.0002215603,0.0033615907,0.000039390918,0.07207822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06688189,0.0061538364,0.0005618928,0.4145295,0.0059357216,0.0005355098,0.0015756156,0.000114355884,0.50371164],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99616134,0.00074171973,0.00029996695,0.00029549105,0.00085436983,0.0016469995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873432,0.0041393107,0.00020424867,0.00023358832,0.0048361635,0.0032434564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033980217,0.0005427178,0.00088471547,0.00080300623,0.011743959,0.0031554322,0.0022189398,0.017530331,0.07778243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01411751,0.00046083494,0.00095777644,0.0013459681,0.0015142736,0.0014280214,0.0029664116,0.013331557,0.0049526035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004120439,0.000015068914,0.0006239458,0.00012542104,0.000008031099,0.0010313198,0.0007149571,0.000056549423,0.000105722625,0.0010708224,0.99208367,0.004123336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000844158,0.00003108568,0.010780221,0.0008106684,0.00004310949,0.0003733177,0.009091879,0.00010978336,0.00019693504,0.000817249,0.97759557,0.0000657335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8601319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9398534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13986808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022881977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09692552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2813835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271674268","doi":"","title":"Complicating Culture in Child Placement Decisions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Welfare; Multiculturalism; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Political science; Agency (philosophy); Ideology; Work (physics); Essentialism; Child protection; Gender studies; Law; Social science; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.02069029042547685,"score_gpt":0.321439722719164,"score_spread":0.3007494322936871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271674268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7986718,0.0023547416,0.001837304,0.0700609,0.0005409737,0.00007151126,0.00005668023,0.000025985211,0.12638004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99343336,0.0004073081,0.00021526265,0.0027666145,0.00003076057,0.000015305828,0.0000069908046,0.000016180025,0.0031080856],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96233505,0.020802805,0.0008961794,0.0017928503,0.0066841533,0.0074890344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753195,0.01266935,0.0033333022,0.0008434493,0.003065787,0.004768701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018840082,0.0002698571,0.00043975384,0.0010971057,0.030686906,0.012572245,0.0027737643,0.002514477,0.0057553225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04373651,0.00065498025,0.0003594132,0.0019597823,0.03357027,0.0026106017,0.011602747,0.007191258,0.00030701834],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064593136,0.00007596052,0.045992248,0.00009131254,0.000036993097,0.0030267155,0.7748606,0.00030419233,0.00040929377,0.12517908,0.01221506,0.037743885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000188793,0.000035639023,0.032395072,0.00061569986,0.00002739432,0.00056599296,0.8818238,0.0003023364,0.00053829304,0.01803495,0.06556209,0.00007993096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5092407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71066564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5092407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04445007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042890303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98729897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272022239","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1411151","title":"Spousal Support in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.010898857132370097,"score_gpt":0.28061960495462207,"score_spread":0.26972074782225197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272022239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9568139,0.002533345,0.000054030334,0.012463712,0.00016471103,0.00005900506,0.003154993,0.000012806164,0.02474357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865297,0.0013039763,0.000069838294,0.0013255742,0.000027594133,0.000028491468,0.0005753042,0.00001140949,0.010128055],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610645,0.00028190258,0.00014751851,0.0002656549,0.00076876325,0.0024297757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910761,0.00045796606,0.00091232086,0.00012437493,0.002523567,0.004905602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001152773,0.00026060577,0.00070807006,0.0027797325,0.014818284,0.00510424,0.002110734,0.001599915,0.012670621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057456386,0.0004470893,0.00066704454,0.0073117153,0.0013932728,0.00093302975,0.0027632534,0.003003609,0.00060870394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048788526,0.00040173417,0.8789021,0.00016864338,0.00016334896,0.0013247136,0.024724955,0.00030052153,0.00024646593,0.013396849,0.036718626,0.043164235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008833535,0.00006659895,0.9035278,0.00040544904,0.00009382879,0.00027789845,0.05650391,0.00044877935,0.00014505751,0.00065549393,0.037693582,0.00009323803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9979001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99913883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08834942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08834942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1449614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6410229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272219748","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002460","title":"Unconstitutionality, Invalidity, and Charter Challenges","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Morality; Positivism; Legal positivism; Law; Duty; Political science; Politics; Constitutionality; Sociology; Law and economics; Constitution; Legal realism; Legal profession","score_opus":0.11902694100008154,"score_gpt":0.3161608745964075,"score_spread":0.19713393359632597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272219748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15263619,0.0041406737,0.03987685,0.1886705,0.0008940507,0.00012501498,0.00012445124,0.00012709657,0.6134051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976008,0.0006222189,0.0038655237,0.0089672785,0.00025431064,0.0000832947,0.000031590745,0.000042453354,0.010125235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9633275,0.012134155,0.001432645,0.004533481,0.013284754,0.0052874153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96718866,0.016322294,0.002459572,0.0042093345,0.008015392,0.0018047863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02576202,0.00040770948,0.0012477939,0.0022246777,0.018131085,0.01446449,0.0035194329,0.008394937,0.0022130453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04739202,0.00056635536,0.00096961844,0.0016916541,0.077921465,0.010264276,0.010590511,0.014054162,0.00024668354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004086112,0.0000066239068,0.00031992834,0.0000076155243,0.0000028512359,0.000061155144,0.0030149755,0.00009529092,0.00002672473,0.9935895,0.0010282131,0.0018429789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015538808,0.000008491016,0.0005878505,0.00006952968,0.000014421448,0.00009653774,0.0023793986,0.00058516534,0.00020684967,0.96529293,0.030719036,0.000024174078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10976524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10104444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89023477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024439512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041755755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21825266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272295218","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2273757","title":"From Empire Ontario to California North: Law and Legal Institutions in Twentieth-Century Ontario","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Law; Legal history; Political science; History","score_opus":0.023039803689051196,"score_gpt":0.28620472000867136,"score_spread":0.2631649163196202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272295218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71814173,0.008831962,0.0005694357,0.036073685,0.00019079327,0.00009665015,0.0014129331,0.000045058685,0.23463766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9280668,0.0030344743,0.00043092313,0.0012595942,0.000040765924,0.00004569378,0.0002610902,0.000030085002,0.066830695],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987287,0.0001089709,0.000037671834,0.00012537904,0.00034009884,0.00065916777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960918,0.0004490103,0.00042100475,0.00012221735,0.0015384345,0.0013774685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009096638,0.00017753002,0.0003469265,0.0019381368,0.02667882,0.0058198273,0.0011455264,0.0012150117,0.009471458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036243137,0.00042450044,0.0002914773,0.004663314,0.007492465,0.0019345593,0.0030866517,0.001857478,0.0003215245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034192085,0.00014288073,0.20293392,0.00042095708,0.00008915575,0.0016704872,0.3358931,0.0009989776,0.0012529299,0.30558756,0.08560518,0.06506303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040093117,0.00003304244,0.3642167,0.0003649319,0.00007078432,0.00022939545,0.12942001,0.000359541,0.0003970302,0.0062341257,0.49856225,0.0000721361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16217287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16217287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1715783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9717607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273006933","doi":"","title":"L’Accès À La Justice Des Enfants Et Leur Droit De Participation Devant Les Tribunaux: Quelques Réflexion (Access to Justice for Children and Their Right to Participate in Court: Few Thoughts)","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Art","score_opus":0.03696434733967204,"score_gpt":0.3683390654112594,"score_spread":0.33137471807158736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273006933","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13931128,0.08116319,0.0030449878,0.43459868,0.0027048301,0.000041372667,0.00018271494,0.000030971158,0.33892193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9366878,0.00962941,0.0003634323,0.023519596,0.0008815859,0.000030282254,0.000026178157,0.000021820812,0.028839875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99487346,0.002854862,0.00011214297,0.0004930541,0.00041468398,0.0012516329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99568164,0.0027524375,0.00030588557,0.00015767294,0.0006500589,0.00045224893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040292023,0.0003529517,0.00040362176,0.0007547699,0.012769319,0.0073073218,0.0011588223,0.0058121597,0.007986321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063184737,0.00020174954,0.00030976353,0.00090876716,0.020601695,0.005343499,0.0032061632,0.005942032,0.0005290958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053013322,0.000033904005,0.002791876,0.0002772486,0.000017664948,0.0013849084,0.22123653,0.00011244583,0.00030016026,0.7111471,0.039473962,0.02317123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001662167,0.000086542146,0.012429648,0.0015368633,0.000025657328,0.0012810505,0.23828776,0.00017355428,0.00042443202,0.05097307,0.69468385,0.000080981634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24254458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22608137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24254458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011688162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070176045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48226565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W227303418","doi":"","title":"Introducing the Women's Court of Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Politics; Downtown; Poverty; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; History","score_opus":0.012400200402104024,"score_gpt":0.22125499699720752,"score_spread":0.2088547965951035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W227303418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00797483,0.008013708,0.0011038996,0.21899742,0.006821923,0.0001044211,0.00023575305,0.0000926475,0.7566554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17099464,0.0038451755,0.0011127838,0.08120957,0.0007833347,0.00012687324,0.000109158274,0.0001871908,0.7416314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99215007,0.0009863654,0.00012114099,0.001023158,0.0023351964,0.0033840567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960537,0.0007441142,0.000096234806,0.00012848873,0.0014324737,0.0015450935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032049806,0.00063216727,0.0005282062,0.0013023652,0.06750685,0.019287582,0.0029560977,0.0133238,0.041419674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00885712,0.0007324175,0.0006489352,0.001484463,0.014605407,0.0047729067,0.007080766,0.01500079,0.0028857738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018467048,0.00001612932,0.0008232725,0.00004852833,0.0000075990674,0.0009426371,0.013040478,0.00015692964,0.00014832923,0.5327305,0.4366411,0.015426133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074680947,0.0000056334193,0.0007810287,0.00017105901,0.0000060797456,0.00008726439,0.013494986,0.0000920372,0.0000669581,0.01182745,0.9734268,0.00003320513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9722888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9909986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13042195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13042195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14837262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9462819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273228752","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198786429.003.0006","title":"Cohabitants, Choice, and the Public Interest","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Legislature; Balance (ability); Political science; Property (philosophy); Face (sociological concept); Law; Law reform; Family law; Principal (computer security); Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.04993836644928008,"score_gpt":0.2608547602049952,"score_spread":0.21091639375571514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273228752","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0905956,0.014022377,0.0017927556,0.022030395,0.0002598614,0.000045354464,0.000034122408,0.000013548912,0.87120587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9236467,0.004673235,0.00036090045,0.0021133134,0.00017099167,0.000056224202,0.00002409315,0.000015137706,0.06893932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984842,0.0006366407,0.000025711559,0.00019961673,0.00030621607,0.00034761225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993818,0.0003495209,0.00004640346,0.000055015782,0.00005752127,0.000109697496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016088302,0.00023385805,0.0002897147,0.0006146286,0.008364044,0.00545747,0.0006879371,0.0015557262,0.010259205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023614059,0.00016920008,0.00019808256,0.00087210495,0.02064221,0.0039866623,0.0044774273,0.0032608807,0.00050032564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055919836,0.000014743738,0.00027897046,0.000011608538,0.0000013893288,0.000075892334,0.010492808,0.000035808513,0.00004951868,0.97812414,0.0025822422,0.008327286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001969201,0.000043926262,0.0031344222,0.00040549348,0.000012309719,0.0003272391,0.03694098,0.00030206668,0.00030177712,0.5798788,0.37861523,0.000018032375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024062067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024362668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024062067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005281943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038014883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047843993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273483782","doi":"","title":"Pregnant Women and the 'Born Alive' Rule in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Personhood; Tort; Autonomy; Political science; Duty; Liability; Appeal; Duty of care; Common law","score_opus":0.005688272313574033,"score_gpt":0.2283428665690549,"score_spread":0.22265459425548087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273483782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79911107,0.007007189,0.00050314266,0.05634834,0.00041836867,0.00008226231,0.0003107595,0.000024041577,0.13619478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843441,0.0025847305,0.00015667222,0.0037534048,0.000027060141,0.00000818236,0.000046840527,0.000007942423,0.009071078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971674,0.0001761543,0.00007082406,0.00019336435,0.0008190604,0.0015731726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681795,0.00063148554,0.0005217744,0.00007436514,0.00075642666,0.0011979467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015587155,0.0001603919,0.00038749274,0.0009781147,0.02024453,0.0041024024,0.0015624118,0.0022650494,0.00428592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008576167,0.000334592,0.0003128221,0.0015857748,0.0061387494,0.00088045397,0.002476995,0.0042381105,0.00013018864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014858303,0.00020500594,0.21571322,0.00015506313,0.000058858634,0.006404778,0.16152337,0.00089216756,0.000924684,0.49955592,0.03281262,0.081605725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118522876,0.00014099834,0.44321856,0.00097558857,0.00024585504,0.0029140378,0.21178268,0.0018375776,0.0014878098,0.030236032,0.30673942,0.00030283575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99818546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09497063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09497063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15462182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6890634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274679933","doi":"10.32597/dmin/50/","title":"Trinitarian Leadership as a Seventh-day Adventist Perspective on Empowering Leadership in Local Churches in Western Ontario","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Teamwork; Local church; Leadership development; Church Growth; Vocational education; Empowerment; Seventh day adventist; Authentic leadership; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Management; Psychology; Theology; Pedagogy; Law","score_opus":0.14194183785986628,"score_gpt":0.35939792613963206,"score_spread":0.21745608827976579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274679933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.881674,0.0020657384,0.00046535867,0.01542665,0.00011062274,0.00006388508,0.00006130775,0.000018785888,0.100113645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720668,0.0008271901,0.00030062502,0.00057101453,0.000013998927,0.000020852829,0.000025595686,0.000007588052,0.026166325],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918073,0.00027608816,0.000019128343,0.00005260267,0.0001382324,0.00033308592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986375,0.00016901393,0.0001082657,0.000032779033,0.0002569326,0.00079562824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009579535,0.0001301699,0.00013845632,0.0006004957,0.013055238,0.0026590708,0.000733054,0.0004136525,0.0027694588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011554704,0.00013877646,0.00013173562,0.00081962394,0.00575583,0.00080315315,0.0020962828,0.0009299265,0.00011838902],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004933218,0.00009065377,0.06602744,0.00020960829,0.000008297113,0.0018653164,0.8646847,0.00015960992,0.001713432,0.02771833,0.013396871,0.024076413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068455765,0.000055174216,0.13147904,0.00021354739,0.000011330957,0.00024328708,0.7303015,0.00014916543,0.00020993993,0.000869961,0.13644096,0.000019283118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9103395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9858644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089660525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035731595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03431545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25925213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276637496","doi":"","title":"Following Fisher : Ontario Spousal Support Trends 2008-09","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.015322794432625126,"score_gpt":0.29052446951486494,"score_spread":0.2752016750822398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276637496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076773055,0.013615588,0.0003498534,0.40534952,0.0048712916,0.00027296314,0.04584894,0.00037993214,0.45253876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22851996,0.016983613,0.0013723447,0.1013752,0.0020189076,0.0004591679,0.019895334,0.0003384865,0.629037],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965348,0.000100254765,0.00013549444,0.00019766814,0.002180283,0.0008514303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99030334,0.0005294408,0.00084402773,0.00026352785,0.005417288,0.0026423866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015943167,0.00024746917,0.000263553,0.0019196823,0.011124777,0.004739002,0.0017843491,0.003693197,0.03377842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008171461,0.0005162814,0.00039022218,0.004956059,0.0011885461,0.0015558626,0.002178533,0.0030752206,0.0050936015],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004411427,0.000025320833,0.011591568,0.00012666901,0.000007837097,0.00033573186,0.0023299332,0.00003240527,0.00016404748,0.0040324745,0.95780003,0.023509853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015277677,0.000010778271,0.06702995,0.00016440505,0.0000084604935,0.000075488584,0.0027552024,0.00003902851,0.00010126566,0.00025066384,0.92951965,0.00002981919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98787004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061655305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061655305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11754473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44734263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277137708","doi":"","title":"Battered Women Under Duress: The Supreme Court of Canada's Abandonment of Context and Purpose in R. v. Ryan","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; Laurentian University; University of Saskatchewan; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Abandonment (legal); Law; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Political science; High Court; Sociology; Criminology; History","score_opus":0.01815682813647744,"score_gpt":0.26182820609740615,"score_spread":0.2436713779609287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277137708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48355177,0.01195304,0.0015922775,0.30977213,0.0012751673,0.0001466151,0.00018921461,0.00006394117,0.19145581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9377696,0.0020422183,0.00041746744,0.036737103,0.00016159854,0.000031619897,0.000025827472,0.00003617258,0.02277839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906437,0.0018289916,0.00019977683,0.0009778853,0.0023011272,0.0040484876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932411,0.0026896559,0.00031400204,0.00023803966,0.0018333553,0.0016839296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00766438,0.0003583357,0.0009261122,0.0007748883,0.04922421,0.011508963,0.0034862377,0.012674505,0.002163803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018335575,0.0007444928,0.0005661581,0.001143173,0.023345355,0.0027194435,0.005918114,0.020276427,0.00017057911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013367753,0.0000572741,0.009967204,0.00010112011,0.00007187592,0.0070302514,0.20764951,0.00095214904,0.0020714423,0.6858188,0.06418075,0.021965967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016382507,0.00014948426,0.030603234,0.0012230356,0.00031552248,0.002124908,0.28537583,0.0017267135,0.0026392678,0.06701815,0.6078299,0.0008300485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9862191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09223611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09223611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15952878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66922295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279117559","doi":"","title":"R. v. Powley: Its Implications for the Metis and Other Aboriginal Peoples in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Political science; Geography; Ethnology; Genealogy; History; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02325128519662669,"score_gpt":0.3096805012467216,"score_spread":0.2864292160500949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279117559","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11692548,0.009728612,0.0006994121,0.665315,0.0013950672,0.00013334988,0.0004179221,0.000041067273,0.20534414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8165866,0.0059655323,0.0007591404,0.11525923,0.00051079603,0.00008913323,0.000061430495,0.00004905421,0.060719013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950147,0.0009566201,0.000109961744,0.0004234096,0.0008724337,0.0026228433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99311215,0.0019623481,0.0003154364,0.00014228385,0.0019722336,0.002495549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004080798,0.00038458346,0.00065857254,0.0014695227,0.05464058,0.008504517,0.004358656,0.01685655,0.008705268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015083598,0.0004755115,0.0006117952,0.0025482653,0.020892194,0.0034594922,0.004682958,0.014071716,0.0004496396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000955009,0.000097073585,0.026182203,0.00022223205,0.000053169413,0.00326829,0.11815557,0.00091328047,0.0002858109,0.5379407,0.27530447,0.037481774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112119305,0.00007482444,0.051757313,0.0019601574,0.00020784378,0.0014083842,0.4667575,0.0018079063,0.0005929228,0.11752152,0.35749888,0.0003006819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99430877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06765838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06765838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19783361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4908982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280046500","doi":"","title":"Developments in Family Law: The 2008-2009 Term - Just Divisions?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Family law; Unconscionability; Common law","score_opus":0.025646539604253726,"score_gpt":0.31748137290836337,"score_spread":0.29183483330410964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280046500","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05948025,0.017772097,0.0011297005,0.55859077,0.002204875,0.000034648307,0.00025798246,0.00003907569,0.3604907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7208146,0.010372811,0.0010533571,0.15655276,0.00093856495,0.000057264708,0.0002799572,0.00005378398,0.10987683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678886,0.00043340292,0.00010431084,0.00041444588,0.0011537357,0.0011053293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975852,0.000589237,0.00019737684,0.00012438053,0.00079790404,0.0007058842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029745742,0.00016456131,0.00021689553,0.00065861776,0.014239295,0.008508386,0.0012271643,0.0057187635,0.005213793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068439427,0.00025153285,0.0002723472,0.00072872615,0.01498577,0.006057843,0.002291352,0.008657174,0.00046443037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013013671,0.000021391495,0.0019720392,0.000022500302,0.000002222166,0.00036533474,0.013981027,0.000053418116,0.00014103975,0.8708555,0.0905656,0.022006854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011482084,0.00001410724,0.011033008,0.00030621327,0.0000051370307,0.00025898498,0.014214225,0.00010708754,0.00014341886,0.039394904,0.93448067,0.000030577365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78727174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8701429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78727174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04758795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037627168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42796206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281456330","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2263759","title":"A Simple Lawyer's Impressions of the Lex Mercatoria, and Certain Examples of Its Acceptance by the Canadian Judiciary","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Law; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.016963604728551584,"score_gpt":0.2904565858068526,"score_spread":0.273492981078301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281456330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49973628,0.0009391064,0.0021016325,0.0684783,0.0003636889,0.00011268841,0.0002911454,0.000078191755,0.42789897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9667498,0.0003400256,0.00063006126,0.0041225543,0.00006466317,0.000018734649,0.000042335545,0.00003364755,0.027998222],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965642,0.00073430775,0.000057988753,0.00026447183,0.0014417279,0.0009373444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99460137,0.0023039377,0.00045612504,0.00025188824,0.0016258219,0.0007609863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026803112,0.00034213116,0.00021122131,0.0021787714,0.032601997,0.0073801926,0.0014750339,0.005017218,0.0056531117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015433187,0.00031174498,0.00031076866,0.0024216187,0.016936231,0.0027968518,0.0022074864,0.0074731964,0.0003018087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013902971,0.000065639484,0.010154655,0.000093273564,0.00002418916,0.0016365206,0.638939,0.00034370436,0.00233045,0.26196083,0.06600197,0.018310713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003867025,0.00007007428,0.06103504,0.00023142394,0.000047197584,0.0006317056,0.6156537,0.0011769233,0.0017783914,0.03051094,0.28862503,0.00020085303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9085852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95609224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09141481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028695367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015012555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20820045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282543069","doi":"10.21991/c9009c","title":"BCGSEU: TURNING A PAGE IN CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.043553941281185574,"score_gpt":0.29173936810177226,"score_spread":0.2481854268205867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282543069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065207058,0.010295111,0.0023192877,0.33060405,0.010357161,0.00015707544,0.0010316806,0.0006037811,0.63811123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10850971,0.0047557503,0.0047922963,0.09092524,0.0016781616,0.00019604688,0.00051000516,0.00065301644,0.78797984],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919458,0.0009343388,0.00016957967,0.00048631305,0.003646461,0.0028174832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941093,0.0018702161,0.0001111355,0.00019980349,0.0023843877,0.0013251894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054264646,0.00084443274,0.0008069694,0.003347247,0.03977395,0.023412824,0.0034280024,0.030007247,0.051845998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015794002,0.000985418,0.0009921291,0.0047242776,0.012810168,0.008504662,0.0044796555,0.014774935,0.0044921977],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009417703,0.000012607785,0.00015018356,0.000029973215,0.0000030247345,0.00014708239,0.0031633296,0.00013797215,0.00006837618,0.28465068,0.70455253,0.0070748096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013872573,0.0000044424946,0.001337642,0.00015711898,0.000009293208,0.00003600582,0.0043394854,0.00025152884,0.00015132409,0.023785416,0.9698275,0.000086418615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98778266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9931798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11748187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11748187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17623413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85239464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284449078","doi":"","title":"Who Influences Family Law Reform? Discourses on Motherhood and Fatherhood in Legislative Reform Debates in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Child support; Compromise; Legislation; Law reform; Alienation; Family law; Political science; Child custody; Enforcement; House of Commons; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.023116226903533123,"score_gpt":0.2708984492598553,"score_spread":0.24778222235632216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284449078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40103343,0.019070875,0.0011843134,0.33751258,0.0006526769,0.00008346281,0.00013831428,0.00005287081,0.24027151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97277373,0.0031704637,0.0002521484,0.0109531265,0.000067644876,0.000023637833,0.000019479567,0.000026728601,0.0127130905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870286,0.0038191308,0.00022637066,0.00096355495,0.0022837077,0.005678553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98637855,0.006511864,0.00096841605,0.00028476986,0.0032550767,0.0026012692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014217092,0.00037111627,0.0006584997,0.002552551,0.063401006,0.015855165,0.0029656785,0.0059456644,0.005095939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02056606,0.000531703,0.00035200897,0.0038510899,0.03779321,0.003861081,0.0056464607,0.0067697093,0.0002012859],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004426788,0.000045554774,0.0076151052,0.00013147072,0.000017278344,0.00070432643,0.4682149,0.00036566047,0.00046048895,0.49072385,0.016946932,0.014730227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048543527,0.000031061547,0.02274259,0.0008219627,0.000057663852,0.00013614135,0.43335396,0.000836464,0.0008778051,0.021454431,0.51951283,0.00012654855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99022573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28129166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.28129166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26249605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8335998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284562238","doi":"","title":"Le Langage Des Accommodements Raisonnables: Quelles Perspectives Pour L'Égalité Des Enfants Handicapés En Milieu Scolaire? (The Language of Reasonable Accommodations: What Prospects for Equality of Disabled Children in Schools?)","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Inclusion (mineral); Jurisprudence; Ethnology; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022048788922028422,"score_gpt":0.32717876575793803,"score_spread":0.3051299768359096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284562238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40335456,0.045110513,0.004861544,0.24157956,0.0008555219,0.000043553955,0.00019824816,0.000045545097,0.303951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97534865,0.005217364,0.0005648378,0.0024935654,0.00010761728,0.000017165377,0.000019384092,0.00001311886,0.016218241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647707,0.0020245179,0.00008536724,0.00021860265,0.00034857995,0.0008458639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970386,0.0011412938,0.00042881412,0.00014571867,0.0006445653,0.00060103025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038051466,0.00036118817,0.0003207022,0.0009526545,0.008266902,0.0071048364,0.00093241024,0.0023145669,0.007123007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004002743,0.00014328322,0.0003201374,0.0010124911,0.022901425,0.0045048846,0.0035764582,0.0027022427,0.00040102433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005227021,0.000024306932,0.005249291,0.00016169231,0.00000819253,0.0009076066,0.38251686,0.0001583023,0.00040885477,0.5782377,0.007897408,0.024377447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000986153,0.000060919752,0.014576451,0.00087738334,0.000016997712,0.0005971067,0.6540769,0.00018216981,0.00040345237,0.05025854,0.27887952,0.00006072926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31525287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37559724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31525287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015215819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012639681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6268358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286461920","doi":"","title":"Criminal responsibility for the non-disclosure of HIV-positive status before sexual activity.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Conviction; Appeal; Sexual intercourse; Condom; Dishonesty; Supreme court; Criminology; Psychology; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Law; Political science; Medicine; Family medicine; Population; Environmental health","score_opus":0.03909334202062168,"score_gpt":0.3032778931720079,"score_spread":0.26418455115138617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286461920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075763226,0.027356746,0.0015040727,0.27025613,0.0028964968,0.0002386029,0.00063920644,0.000055995588,0.62128955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6845603,0.009086801,0.0010707373,0.11606114,0.0006192302,0.00016421024,0.00021716657,0.000025813835,0.18819462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99519324,0.00079156953,0.0003178425,0.0003741159,0.0022749226,0.0010483393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99548054,0.001971229,0.0006057096,0.00028514478,0.0010746903,0.00058264245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003107123,0.0002981065,0.00022340487,0.00053265534,0.00852232,0.0031968837,0.0010633138,0.005562616,0.0050182133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01541931,0.00032896947,0.0003569844,0.00041140686,0.0071825376,0.0020030949,0.002789998,0.006637411,0.00074753124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004410542,0.00008283342,0.014149986,0.0002527548,0.000026404376,0.0018563524,0.05417168,0.000095329146,0.0007833363,0.62480664,0.21791686,0.08581377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056820114,0.000128958,0.057955056,0.0011512242,0.000057206704,0.0030197608,0.024304405,0.0002949874,0.0009836388,0.043506674,0.86843437,0.000106865795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44250342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6276337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44250342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067777555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022584297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8798555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286894700","doi":"","title":"Sometimes Help Hurts: Imagining a New Approach to Section 15(2)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Supreme court; Charter; Law; Deference; Political science; Law and economics; Section (typography); Substantive law; Sociology","score_opus":0.018972716733451977,"score_gpt":0.28571137156409193,"score_spread":0.26673865483063997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286894700","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023565346,0.0065005026,0.020289429,0.5538184,0.0027231998,0.000049552284,0.000046586032,0.000104704486,0.39290223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88552916,0.0026269695,0.012169088,0.068760306,0.0012314583,0.00011210695,0.0000373587,0.00014189334,0.029391544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820318,0.012813318,0.00020022022,0.0010401816,0.0018710953,0.0020434072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98757416,0.008656385,0.00041386232,0.0008261017,0.0011990016,0.0013304795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019332532,0.0008093224,0.00058355875,0.0021758906,0.019487008,0.02655047,0.0035499344,0.0131582655,0.0045883157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01617938,0.0004908693,0.00076121377,0.0012447283,0.09362589,0.025191905,0.010609204,0.017546164,0.0006917346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007983036,0.000010458406,0.00019211855,0.000017186143,0.0000023584514,0.0001508216,0.035872042,0.00010184003,0.00007598809,0.9495135,0.010305002,0.00375084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013472778,0.000021911232,0.0002603226,0.00024443955,0.000009798028,0.00016646541,0.056429334,0.00043515826,0.00025699325,0.7172807,0.22485898,0.000022379902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042469893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07741555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042469893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023152225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022257745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16798192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287021274","doi":"","title":"Fraternal Justice: Outlining Charles Doherty Gonthier’s Approach to Law, Morality and Community","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Morality; Economic Justice; Tribute; Humanism; Citizenship; Compassion; Political science; Courtesy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03830158954409527,"score_gpt":0.32992563649234596,"score_spread":0.29162404694825067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287021274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020385498,0.03985307,0.01349943,0.3987632,0.0055034733,0.00009755655,0.000050511087,0.000076788674,0.52177054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6876131,0.017255275,0.010380083,0.14460634,0.0024073762,0.00022545017,0.00003437299,0.00017663126,0.13730136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99682164,0.0015955304,0.000040873205,0.00032534558,0.0005956753,0.00062092073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983065,0.0009259317,0.00008052982,0.00008409251,0.0002817022,0.00032113434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035608609,0.00037116124,0.0004527183,0.0018413257,0.018772613,0.008697416,0.0020727157,0.0071424004,0.0026163294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00420051,0.00024544107,0.00031611093,0.0015267818,0.042911936,0.0052634533,0.004991291,0.009564114,0.0003976306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027726094,0.000007787551,0.00012491684,0.000014664558,0.0000013923432,0.00012312994,0.019949172,0.000077165256,0.00003392988,0.9546212,0.022015695,0.003028215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007482407,0.000009847733,0.00051221874,0.0003007541,0.0000041360254,0.00021208687,0.020605754,0.00021540414,0.00006579776,0.40837952,0.5696631,0.000023906738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22623754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3799278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22623754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0203708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014857986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44984138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287174608","doi":"10.7202/1100998ar","title":"LE DROIT EUROPÉEN DES DROITS DE LA PERSONNE DANS LA JURISPRUDENCE CANADIENNE ET QUÉBÉCOISE","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Police Service; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.017499604345205696,"score_gpt":0.28695559922548985,"score_spread":0.26945599488028416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287174608","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10805911,0.07861946,0.0028534958,0.13600932,0.0014672214,0.00005096142,0.0002699458,0.000034925135,0.6726357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8520438,0.014915911,0.00089860946,0.014008213,0.00023604065,0.000047409125,0.00008093913,0.00003871284,0.11773035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970343,0.0008921087,0.00007526848,0.00028033135,0.0008365677,0.0008814219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977393,0.0006904302,0.00014530231,0.00010623217,0.0008612019,0.00045740485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027256228,0.00034324813,0.00043365365,0.0018435024,0.013301853,0.008266459,0.0009879002,0.003413713,0.0070144124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049514635,0.00023110726,0.0003297897,0.0026397076,0.014647563,0.0033715246,0.0027367065,0.0043837577,0.00040610478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029188972,0.00001688758,0.0037822798,0.00008952838,0.000023708004,0.00042611742,0.036791414,0.00025881303,0.00029841144,0.8917333,0.037719794,0.028830526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019331954,0.000022253998,0.025621612,0.0008787055,0.00003865257,0.0003487165,0.037852153,0.00029043056,0.00029521892,0.0429808,0.8915696,0.00008252151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9514383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9733858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048561692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041220482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05021755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29907697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288220793","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Castaways: Poverty and the Mclachlin Court","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Poverty; Scrutiny; Political science; Law; Disadvantage; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); High Court; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.012166787109998906,"score_gpt":0.27814098004814913,"score_spread":0.2659741929381502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288220793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15021434,0.012490594,0.0052667037,0.22895265,0.0008079086,0.00007685345,0.000104100094,0.000070204864,0.60201657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95277715,0.0008953128,0.00062678487,0.0234333,0.00020758767,0.000053898115,0.00001307534,0.000017331444,0.02197556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918813,0.0030490572,0.00022869956,0.0008689468,0.0017585991,0.0022134066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99496645,0.0033592428,0.00046470578,0.00026852946,0.00045864418,0.00048235196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069792476,0.00023639215,0.00045749117,0.0013883223,0.023176447,0.013058741,0.001708923,0.009696683,0.0041018785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01492022,0.0003950986,0.00044449282,0.0014986634,0.03866645,0.006628036,0.00777673,0.011894539,0.00020619802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004817401,0.000004076176,0.00018812124,0.0000065097993,0.000001338428,0.000089509704,0.003073676,0.00004866465,0.00003430039,0.99276286,0.0025464958,0.001239644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036126166,0.00002514841,0.001492769,0.00037396644,0.000021258267,0.00015711058,0.01309061,0.00055045204,0.0004748602,0.8207249,0.16298671,0.00006608912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1341601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1741362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8658399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020512378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016207045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26675838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288602243","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2201883","title":"A Situational Approach to Incapacity and Mental Disability in Sexual Assault Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Situational ethics; Psychology; Mental health; Psychiatry; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Social psychology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.020508094928500684,"score_gpt":0.289812920759463,"score_spread":0.2693048258309623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288602243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73723376,0.0027211679,0.014606532,0.02537167,0.00026534565,0.00016934838,0.00019568225,0.000050026545,0.21938649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99809843,0.00030140762,0.0006738619,0.0001810058,0.000024630137,0.0000282822,0.000022085937,0.000003918423,0.00066643814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975744,0.0017845422,0.0000860477,0.00011152989,0.00013199689,0.0003114176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957997,0.0025175402,0.0004343898,0.00020257934,0.00033376217,0.00071196887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019699016,0.00035498178,0.00024643532,0.0029828502,0.006192165,0.007854489,0.0011893661,0.0017666421,0.0055102273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00582275,0.0004429992,0.00047154038,0.0017086936,0.009097249,0.005786089,0.0067497096,0.0025658475,0.0002119961],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008816818,0.0007796725,0.08288595,0.00023341141,0.00003721513,0.0034531124,0.20698695,0.0012594569,0.0003311127,0.6743079,0.002554006,0.027083108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022157688,0.00014999887,0.039258886,0.00032510114,0.000065253575,0.0025172615,0.74513197,0.002911235,0.00023632095,0.1937886,0.015547189,0.00004598739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015181576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024548166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015181576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003453484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049099443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030186415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289016748","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1411164","title":"Property Rights for Unmarried Cohabitants in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Property rights; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Medicine; Business; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01077218619591573,"score_gpt":0.2544020456370191,"score_spread":0.2436298594411034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289016748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.972652,0.0008938345,0.00006595894,0.001983573,0.000035057263,0.000032151856,0.0009141049,0.0000052327186,0.023417966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98753965,0.00047877754,0.000072930285,0.00040883254,0.0000065954637,0.000010715393,0.00020808981,0.0000051427623,0.0112694],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982052,0.000101660735,0.000057637833,0.00011014551,0.00033810636,0.0011873042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99420506,0.0005782095,0.0006308077,0.00015738026,0.002030017,0.0023986218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094475044,0.00015441343,0.00047777483,0.0017553094,0.014680723,0.003927445,0.0016860699,0.0010122837,0.0106801465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004384218,0.0002190359,0.00042539646,0.003902307,0.0018596327,0.00091443985,0.001960911,0.002115935,0.00038556432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053179625,0.0004911197,0.75871336,0.0001658352,0.00010357107,0.0024058465,0.070100985,0.00076133816,0.00074080133,0.06379438,0.024351904,0.07783909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006401338,0.00010632955,0.7945359,0.0003215836,0.00008824584,0.00048462552,0.15211105,0.0014345259,0.00049976894,0.0032953622,0.046956405,0.00010220036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04274778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04274778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.072771564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3101583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289101702","doi":"","title":"From Equal Access to Individual Exit: The Invisibility of Systemic Discrimination in Moore","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Political science; Special education; Law","score_opus":0.046630776396146524,"score_gpt":0.3464526636654009,"score_spread":0.29982188726925435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289101702","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120706186,0.001487162,0.01903598,0.07541738,0.00043145462,0.00009861155,0.0000870692,0.00006881464,0.7826674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9414925,0.0005392732,0.0019082747,0.023322646,0.00021082323,0.00007983905,0.000028200251,0.000049389626,0.03236908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882329,0.0024886176,0.00036508965,0.0021052212,0.0037619441,0.0030462756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99302715,0.0036485256,0.0006099676,0.0010364392,0.0009879898,0.00068985566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008898006,0.00039474474,0.0007710463,0.000905862,0.013184526,0.010638379,0.002210486,0.010887934,0.008114509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01909388,0.00048109336,0.0010100713,0.000747424,0.046220627,0.009994378,0.013350034,0.015545232,0.0007272457],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000932958,0.000010601543,0.00055452023,0.000008714116,0.0000037116524,0.00020557616,0.0038251006,0.00012292266,0.000055919165,0.9900787,0.002097711,0.0030271204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049990573,0.000044318975,0.0018230184,0.00024103913,0.000036965044,0.00050833623,0.0076618847,0.0010845665,0.0005968308,0.90951055,0.07838285,0.000059721595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.096347645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11540285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096347645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013371797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016395302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19157362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289191386","doi":"","title":"Morito, Bruce – An Ethic of Mutual Respect: The Covenant Chain and Aboriginal-Crown Relations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Histoire sociale","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Crown (dentistry); Chain (unit); Sociology; Philosophy; Theology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04196600170982918,"score_gpt":0.331758123702943,"score_spread":0.2897921219931138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289191386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0960675,0.025707038,0.003398373,0.30525777,0.0022331136,0.00006209012,0.000085746484,0.00002440805,0.56716394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9174773,0.0052967323,0.0013435711,0.008249653,0.0004179835,0.000053593598,0.000019814226,0.000054636253,0.06708656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981646,0.0011976813,0.000046561272,0.00016807496,0.00018818853,0.00023492675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974974,0.0014540936,0.00021485511,0.00020604227,0.0003694316,0.0002580928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030278119,0.00033292788,0.00025625672,0.000838654,0.015680958,0.007847635,0.0010547794,0.005809738,0.008414911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052353367,0.0002731648,0.00023646634,0.0011057709,0.024677603,0.006232227,0.0029119358,0.005982638,0.0005984084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032961976,0.000014665058,0.00054447877,0.00004820145,0.000010546217,0.00024844738,0.09696609,0.000047423615,0.00017115205,0.8711317,0.02505886,0.0057255053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003162954,0.000029269399,0.0054291086,0.00057120505,0.00003481397,0.00035831108,0.1687292,0.0001724042,0.00058022013,0.35824117,0.46577767,0.000045024495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.071727104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.124047644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9282729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058461595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058052693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1426192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289668687","doi":"","title":"The Child Support Obligation of Step-Parents","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Child support; Discretion; Legislature; Consistency (knowledge bases); Political science; Government (linguistics); Set (abstract data type); Liability; Law; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.013559951933013152,"score_gpt":0.29524343823151145,"score_spread":0.2816834862984983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289668687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27314806,0.015990498,0.007583462,0.15929271,0.00088358356,0.00023176109,0.0005611789,0.00010378073,0.54220504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91876405,0.005788744,0.0029807338,0.024447879,0.00015306358,0.000054236698,0.00009035093,0.00001599953,0.047704887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620336,0.0004868734,0.00017871067,0.00028104841,0.0018359005,0.0010141261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962459,0.0013910575,0.00033069012,0.00014334096,0.001319116,0.0005698977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022920566,0.00015889737,0.00024377427,0.0005671289,0.008235576,0.0034699847,0.0013432136,0.003358798,0.002205433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008566155,0.00024006834,0.00026795425,0.00059338857,0.009347126,0.0013745099,0.0026823669,0.003686779,0.00022990005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024298637,0.000023427257,0.015190727,0.00009734417,0.0000104262435,0.002913942,0.031474747,0.00040066455,0.0007198909,0.8835018,0.03530131,0.030341474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004456794,0.000085835374,0.07532879,0.001402624,0.00008106102,0.0034682283,0.03211543,0.0016501357,0.0020276941,0.10233718,0.78127265,0.00018586293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87434834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9211086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87434834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022462994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.069975875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25278324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289829629","doi":"","title":"Tracking Trajectories: Aboriginal Governance as an Aboriginal Right","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Scholarship; Trajectory; Tracking (education); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.02096227459114635,"score_gpt":0.39207706618783844,"score_spread":0.3711147915966921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289829629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54228675,0.0069853,0.018094636,0.09165478,0.00036535924,0.00024353962,0.0017468929,0.00019636127,0.33842635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97547543,0.003352119,0.005350641,0.000840543,0.000022173695,0.00005228179,0.0004471566,0.00006559732,0.014394012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955526,0.0014962145,0.000104540755,0.00032756917,0.0014663896,0.001052643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99243754,0.0014484662,0.0009674314,0.00059423,0.00291002,0.0016423223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053973002,0.0001953492,0.0002217889,0.0034230913,0.014719241,0.010279861,0.0010856382,0.0010811085,0.0047386694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014290206,0.0002475893,0.00022415098,0.0056586177,0.009823462,0.008534727,0.006259358,0.0029945697,0.0003618775],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054844753,0.00004805368,0.075496964,0.0001240532,0.000021530997,0.00032949372,0.37877327,0.0013722603,0.0006563466,0.41508508,0.017584097,0.110454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007990045,0.00006774855,0.12896118,0.0006412185,0.000026407855,0.0001800084,0.45747513,0.0016889605,0.0010686389,0.06251726,0.34725946,0.00010595529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9028365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94555813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9028365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041270137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0711911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29943722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290375835","doi":"","title":"Charter Remedies for Socio-Economic Rights Violations: Sleeping Under a Box?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Human rights; International human rights law; Law; Fundamental rights; Jurisdiction; Enforcement; Reservation of rights; Right to property; Jurisprudence; Cultural rights","score_opus":0.020633118852794993,"score_gpt":0.3107532768648806,"score_spread":0.29012015801208557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290375835","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060593085,0.109081924,0.009932921,0.75294423,0.012587831,0.00032662653,0.00040277428,0.00045686358,0.10820748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26746365,0.1674489,0.033401005,0.4570108,0.008391581,0.00046095604,0.0010146626,0.00061668945,0.06419169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.962344,0.005933659,0.0018662096,0.0018222125,0.02297279,0.0050612525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.960951,0.013703157,0.0029069816,0.0022921674,0.018286416,0.0018603387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028990693,0.00071959884,0.00119136,0.004923973,0.010493551,0.016161498,0.0049550035,0.012952889,0.0077673504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068274036,0.0005954933,0.001159914,0.0042282636,0.026572922,0.01766288,0.0038134088,0.017612299,0.0014850688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022432796,0.000059830432,0.0009539395,0.00086430233,0.00003268313,0.00036020597,0.006064881,0.00038694305,0.0005194491,0.45174965,0.41058084,0.1284049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003558848,0.000029421308,0.0017669568,0.0033860118,0.000051251565,0.00022000926,0.0061740144,0.00021536021,0.00059800665,0.050656825,0.9367585,0.00010802978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47891337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6072355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47891337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024554059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14965795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95225155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290982794","doi":"","title":"Sommes-Nous Dignes? L'Égalité Et L'Arrêt Gosselin (Do We Have 'Dignity'? Equality and Gosselin)","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Dignity; Humanities; Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; Ethnology; Law; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.022810778633647093,"score_gpt":0.31361140193666076,"score_spread":0.29080062330301365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290982794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.105260246,0.01419593,0.00089590513,0.2228617,0.0008255119,0.000027694014,0.000117461204,0.00001776092,0.65579784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8826305,0.0021853386,0.00019668722,0.017843619,0.00011922802,0.000014842914,0.000015049965,0.000015100715,0.096979626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977888,0.0005539161,0.000022653127,0.00021834836,0.0003501719,0.001066115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986811,0.00036049384,0.00010095592,0.000061071194,0.00035331768,0.0004429843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021440694,0.0002235114,0.00027021187,0.00041157118,0.016132493,0.006949759,0.0007617268,0.0032382726,0.007890539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031555702,0.00012315113,0.00018459244,0.0005967055,0.024630308,0.0028690489,0.0029344284,0.0034532675,0.00042932734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025071256,0.000011329528,0.002037722,0.000033593362,0.000005216175,0.00023883827,0.032422204,0.00006715191,0.0001188968,0.91441727,0.038004357,0.012618282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002456497,0.00003351561,0.023992881,0.0006463838,0.00003008403,0.0001908092,0.10046953,0.00020888887,0.000474568,0.11533771,0.75851274,0.00007826493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8768192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94496536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8768192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036440518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030946888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2643957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291013525","doi":"","title":"Shorter Article: Re-Conceptualizing Equality: A Place for Indigenous Political Identity","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Politics; Charter; Political science; Social equality; Equity (law); Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; State (computer science); Indigenous rights; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.043403333518152384,"score_gpt":0.36548106419938825,"score_spread":0.32207773068123585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291013525","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021964507,0.020605218,0.0023535483,0.7043325,0.1361174,0.000070117705,0.00048491062,0.00009461003,0.13374536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08895218,0.027033709,0.0032915473,0.31873277,0.119579196,0.000175244,0.0006522406,0.0004448745,0.44113818],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975407,0.000633005,0.0000924727,0.00026968497,0.0011459567,0.00031814227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940515,0.0026278656,0.00023084167,0.00019310255,0.0023087733,0.0005879724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022403384,0.0005180022,0.00048803596,0.0011881567,0.0069025666,0.007225834,0.0015704363,0.0063566095,0.021147188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007164702,0.00019610111,0.00049784186,0.0017274775,0.008300727,0.007281077,0.0027315565,0.009908134,0.0037714627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010888291,0.000012391469,0.00014474479,0.00010851972,0.000001883697,0.00006373732,0.004577884,0.0000324315,0.00009735274,0.15752056,0.83013016,0.007299451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053808635,0.000008385467,0.0010438332,0.00019980222,0.0000046707505,0.000093089606,0.0045573497,0.00008816019,0.000074624826,0.012191659,0.98171586,0.000017155198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20311329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25816125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20311329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012627849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016187677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40386206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292220865","doi":"10.4324/9780203796221.ch2_7","title":"Child support, spousal support and the turn to guidelines","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Turn-taking; Turn (biochemistry); Psychology; Child support; Social psychology; Political science; Communication; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.08668117938692038,"score_gpt":0.35458082140110764,"score_spread":0.26789964201418726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292220865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02314712,0.018672554,0.006172297,0.049010318,0.00073526986,0.00010966809,0.00013672828,0.000080108664,0.9019359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7639245,0.015755877,0.008470892,0.0124892015,0.00019671816,0.0001739912,0.00013902395,0.0001078983,0.19874191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964779,0.0009012103,0.00007335719,0.0001769417,0.0016252298,0.0007453241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978016,0.000844521,0.00009735651,0.000102520826,0.00090415357,0.00024994984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030310247,0.00026777497,0.00028914763,0.0011219025,0.010111007,0.0066934624,0.0015739676,0.0019026026,0.0037273795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005975122,0.00022324645,0.00016643538,0.0024805665,0.023103993,0.0028667294,0.0023554314,0.0048781224,0.000397977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015606234,0.0000042896954,0.00023140355,0.000023310873,9.631738e-7,0.000044433848,0.015494257,0.00008835192,0.00002644218,0.9537128,0.017690284,0.012681805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063179364,0.000008561221,0.0035176151,0.00062737556,0.000006932149,0.00010491533,0.025140174,0.00032118973,0.00019884479,0.16386591,0.8061726,0.000029640405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8735355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92288864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8735355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06266013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0849616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45463318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292520573","doi":"","title":"Matrimonial Real Property Issues On-Reserve","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Land law; Customary land; Government (linguistics); Property law; Law; Political science; Property rights; Property (philosophy); Land tenure; Real property; Business; Geography; Legislature; Agriculture","score_opus":0.1437467358959786,"score_gpt":0.3737842354980978,"score_spread":0.2300374996021192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292520573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15132092,0.003105956,0.0014844745,0.019824559,0.0004119849,0.00008614385,0.00027994072,0.00008323851,0.8234028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81367743,0.00087687693,0.0009261327,0.0061172987,0.00017003315,0.00004239206,0.00017843061,0.000038324706,0.17797315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939627,0.00077593146,0.00032930382,0.0006455707,0.0021039466,0.0021826227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948409,0.0017003884,0.00056118437,0.0006569224,0.0015805771,0.0006599648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038427245,0.00022932167,0.0003134108,0.00101514,0.0145564815,0.007611363,0.0023325223,0.0036445512,0.015035093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009954796,0.0003418512,0.00033367393,0.0012859427,0.010636481,0.0029564772,0.0041812533,0.00498668,0.001467235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031890504,0.00007207515,0.0073161665,0.000115007606,0.0000132697205,0.0021246069,0.043126356,0.0002604529,0.0010738987,0.864742,0.05299269,0.028131599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014717787,0.000049433176,0.019943709,0.00039284508,0.000022716275,0.0011296455,0.032605793,0.00055643095,0.0016379874,0.031110916,0.91247815,0.00005757781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49803355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7020448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5019665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018792704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023490079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99026936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292859697","doi":"","title":"HIV, Fraud, Non-Disclosure, Consent and a Stark Choice: Mabior or Sexual Autonomy?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Dignity; Supreme court; Autonomy; Charter; Political science; Law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.022947279053991746,"score_gpt":0.3047823830619129,"score_spread":0.28183510400792117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292859697","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016021634,0.020541564,0.0031770717,0.8547639,0.0014683781,0.00004354936,0.00005768451,0.000027979073,0.10389819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5968372,0.008543201,0.001941579,0.3574915,0.0027048304,0.0000963323,0.0000369119,0.000046286066,0.03230214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858175,0.0049018697,0.00049960555,0.0014581445,0.0037931832,0.0035297263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889659,0.007106344,0.00079269777,0.0005614022,0.0014567671,0.0011167205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01667796,0.00045266372,0.0008511888,0.00091123866,0.011218524,0.016322372,0.002809954,0.026623804,0.0042973394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025421882,0.0004174369,0.00080098864,0.0011236473,0.061574448,0.010837162,0.0059956163,0.02610053,0.00046490607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008488439,0.000008040448,0.00026810964,0.00002210106,0.0000033487604,0.00018677468,0.00203629,0.000028813207,0.000038806626,0.98428994,0.009664867,0.0034443021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049329137,0.00003466471,0.0011385849,0.0006359483,0.000026114018,0.0005930704,0.008397877,0.0005496598,0.00032621843,0.79804116,0.19012642,0.00008095931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1760933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19209586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1760933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017826809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03583111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35013658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292892905","doi":"","title":"The Politics of Poverty: Why the Charter Does Not Protect Welfare Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Dignity; Politics; Law; Political science; Human rights; Jurisprudence; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.040835674136275965,"score_gpt":0.3142010506031132,"score_spread":0.27336537646683723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292892905","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059830514,0.24249518,0.0011498653,0.66308725,0.0015029028,0.000021896234,0.000052923217,0.000021851074,0.08568507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42671052,0.31777322,0.0020776095,0.2266736,0.0039645336,0.00009234965,0.00009204182,0.00009568116,0.02252043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99174666,0.0031591502,0.00016846221,0.0005384589,0.0032659806,0.0011212315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911738,0.005682993,0.0004568007,0.00020676851,0.0019823802,0.0004973757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008470657,0.00023050143,0.0005856711,0.0023275332,0.007875879,0.009383964,0.0017285782,0.0059413933,0.0025550507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013470772,0.00031771953,0.00029926377,0.0032838366,0.03383802,0.0060479576,0.0023657435,0.009414225,0.00042065018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008519749,0.000018447132,0.00042897434,0.0002831575,0.000006218795,0.00015311473,0.0051251054,0.00018454023,0.00007550531,0.85883296,0.0860196,0.048863832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016306296,0.000016125898,0.002534595,0.0024711129,0.000012034349,0.00014488238,0.009114015,0.00022213506,0.00012337636,0.26907405,0.7162425,0.000028821532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3446125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4659763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3446125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027172975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04447881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68521327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292908900","doi":"","title":"A Model of Scholarship","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Economic Justice; Sociology; Administration (probate law); Law; Political science; Accommodation; Psychology","score_opus":0.1136490345130346,"score_gpt":0.3639974830398208,"score_spread":0.2503484485267862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292908900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008281961,0.0022686233,0.08178264,0.049418636,0.0008974976,0.00018350098,0.00013831077,0.00020579474,0.8568231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8033728,0.0029008344,0.04437572,0.0076178713,0.0016294554,0.00093298807,0.0002492218,0.00022667418,0.13869451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901596,0.0053062737,0.00031414756,0.0014779638,0.0018791697,0.00086296553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99300027,0.0027109599,0.0004049611,0.00158565,0.0012644184,0.0010337587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008640228,0.0008046669,0.0007333869,0.0036755637,0.009134718,0.018769946,0.0031028532,0.005896268,0.017013444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008903933,0.0004476353,0.00094772375,0.0030022373,0.044940066,0.027027905,0.008781768,0.0055864938,0.0035604225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013535786,0.000002993278,0.000022544633,0.0000036603617,5.9324276e-7,0.00000766886,0.0004034857,0.00004722929,0.0000060854863,0.99851686,0.0005030711,0.00048457106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011444182,0.0000114666655,0.00003469502,0.000036371337,0.000002009686,0.00004058979,0.0008184219,0.00061585463,0.000020456695,0.9468612,0.05154169,0.0000057391776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006976123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044849105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018769946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014020168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011463392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10172391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293317638","doi":"","title":"Commentary: The Limits of Conscientious and Religious Objection to Physician-Assisted Dying after the Supreme Court's Decision in Carter v. Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Criminal code; Criminal law","score_opus":0.020917824775093893,"score_gpt":0.2591472568507886,"score_spread":0.2382294320756947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293317638","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028846314,0.0025539997,0.000054836535,0.9730681,0.021952583,0.000009564167,0.00010860131,0.000011142503,0.001952761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031412598,0.0010243601,0.00006925831,0.9778015,0.01567848,0.00002277057,0.00002109821,0.000019619949,0.0022217205],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98866946,0.0031055997,0.00092163286,0.0021306828,0.003741147,0.0014314582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94153196,0.043644343,0.0015265207,0.00079559913,0.0089198565,0.0035817174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009796066,0.0013168931,0.0023869516,0.0015561996,0.015584898,0.0057385713,0.010719233,0.0988469,0.0056612776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062001996,0.001387411,0.002255423,0.0022100476,0.01408849,0.0072784717,0.0032403974,0.091160364,0.0037485142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000257224,0.0000074913733,0.00008553846,0.00009403167,0.000012009876,0.00022473134,0.0009183114,0.000027357522,0.000053297288,0.0055586942,0.99119216,0.0018006588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012610525,0.00003612711,0.001439218,0.002197693,0.00009740785,0.0009143336,0.0044478425,0.00025829728,0.0003614882,0.017201552,0.9727289,0.00019102018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2514559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3235832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7485441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018510886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035579234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49998456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293544640","doi":"10.71781/1760","title":"Mariage et divorce : harmonisation des normes civiles et religieuses dans une perspective de droit préventif","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.010304481771526309,"score_gpt":0.2328548133526758,"score_spread":0.22255033158114948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293544640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8406243,0.0063400166,0.003353459,0.044465423,0.00015298124,0.000054837456,0.000061675346,0.00001990636,0.10492741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915342,0.00090615347,0.00031268943,0.00064384687,0.000009910202,0.000016226348,0.000009374606,0.00000578481,0.006561751],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966492,0.0019739484,0.0000569971,0.00015763135,0.0005461611,0.00061596517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977406,0.0006696692,0.00046336997,0.0002190676,0.0003737317,0.0005335004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00348059,0.00031910135,0.0004481793,0.0011043414,0.011832418,0.0040992517,0.0012149614,0.0013324782,0.0035946544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062708086,0.0002398039,0.00020488183,0.0011700406,0.023272347,0.0024558369,0.004794744,0.0032779223,0.00019038863],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035143687,0.000034593984,0.019508135,0.00006155275,0.000022436472,0.0006742345,0.6891558,0.00013834795,0.00034926576,0.27103975,0.0029316559,0.016049067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026001846,0.000087579065,0.064615995,0.00042381804,0.000036463916,0.00076919823,0.74379027,0.00031954263,0.0005846614,0.040796638,0.14847015,0.0000797031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32492256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39395654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32492256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013433841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018341633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6460626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293730945","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2468575","title":"Designing and Implementing Rights-Based Strategies to Address Homelessness and Poverty in Ontario","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Political science; Public administration; Economic growth; Environmental planning; Sociology; Geography; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.019409492255171613,"score_gpt":0.2918408322861725,"score_spread":0.2724313400310009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293730945","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9059501,0.0006612934,0.0016512135,0.01752651,0.00007358497,0.00097223354,0.00012925851,0.000049078073,0.072986774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751025,0.000728438,0.0030845846,0.0010156749,0.000009545878,0.00037927672,0.000074015516,0.000027464132,0.019578572],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99471515,0.0015680846,0.00011805099,0.00020216234,0.00079403404,0.0026024785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935154,0.0014633081,0.00057149294,0.00032236896,0.001455623,0.002671856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00385475,0.00023925876,0.0002767847,0.0007587481,0.020612977,0.0043692156,0.0020652874,0.0012968465,0.005073534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008790947,0.0003846443,0.00035659785,0.001164839,0.006325498,0.0018654233,0.005602869,0.0014609833,0.00029190278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040005037,0.0014352227,0.13360548,0.00065286376,0.000065173066,0.0018169556,0.51033604,0.003384828,0.0031028804,0.050147712,0.028177308,0.2668755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001436602,0.00047852955,0.1387499,0.0004226403,0.000093106995,0.00014114207,0.6705569,0.0020417278,0.0014544592,0.0068963515,0.17893822,0.00008339915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97586787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09211204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09211204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28925982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6683228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W229456410","doi":"","title":"The Covenanters in Canada: Reformed Presbyterianism from 1820 to 2012 by Eldon Hay (review)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Historical Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hay; History; Political science; Animal science; Biology","score_opus":0.02134384397751601,"score_gpt":0.2563559113974606,"score_spread":0.2350120674199446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W229456410","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028276988,0.94885224,0.00009094579,0.02987899,0.0017807902,0.000011888888,0.000272651,0.000008876311,0.016275916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.055635795,0.9177413,0.00030366043,0.012362124,0.0007920479,0.000018293153,0.000249427,0.000027679083,0.012869663],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684757,0.00039880548,0.00016655696,0.00031476526,0.0014109383,0.00086134754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99450135,0.0007421052,0.00039853217,0.00010523538,0.0036190776,0.00063368166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00333419,0.0008277596,0.0010669109,0.006113407,0.009854177,0.008002294,0.0019996502,0.002810284,0.005757238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007980143,0.00067260023,0.00045514863,0.018205354,0.009719168,0.0034288804,0.0025191503,0.004529582,0.0006018113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097408956,0.00003449055,0.0028873982,0.0054430105,0.00011923009,0.00036411552,0.01400171,0.0006400368,0.00014815023,0.11129915,0.542053,0.32291234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000879932,0.0000091868305,0.011201632,0.0071779555,0.00007713085,0.00012239999,0.0056763785,0.000047595222,0.00009646911,0.0027699966,0.9727509,0.00006151395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9930894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10885528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10885528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35520387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.789804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294594145","doi":"10.7202/1027138ar","title":"Jean Pineau et Marie Pratte, La famille, Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2006, 1057 pages, ISBN 978-2-89400-222-3","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.018849284659131924,"score_gpt":0.26888881780074275,"score_spread":0.2500395331416108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294594145","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00062199146,0.8528211,0.0011828198,0.019632492,0.0056387167,0.000043325537,0.0017399521,0.0003392313,0.117980376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00871569,0.5260216,0.002133658,0.0034836654,0.002309658,0.0000799341,0.0016195612,0.00040192547,0.45523426],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992055,0.00011403907,0.00003893261,0.0001131555,0.00043702556,0.00009135567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891853,0.00031319985,0.00007815397,0.00004317439,0.00049920345,0.00014784613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010272132,0.0014384395,0.0008942671,0.002541984,0.0020048162,0.0034780542,0.0014762424,0.0017182874,0.13869774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019874999,0.00070992275,0.00043135346,0.0052677537,0.0010996049,0.003296741,0.0011021931,0.002290539,0.04884311],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016209011,0.000009174107,0.00023374516,0.0004437275,0.000007662395,0.00003987605,0.00064214197,0.000054458687,0.0001546534,0.0035342157,0.91537416,0.079489894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039166,0.0000047325734,0.0018938285,0.00038524953,0.0000044887383,0.00011601653,0.00041732486,0.00002641166,0.000049391972,0.00061258394,0.9964741,0.000011873069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46584678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6314999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46584678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008389556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008955217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9262705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295916283","doi":"","title":"Sexual Orientation as a Human Rights Issue in Canada 1969-1985","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Lesbian; Sexual orientation; Personhood; Politics; Political science; Ideology; Oppression; Sociology; Homosexuality; Law; Gender studies","score_opus":0.015300004676063563,"score_gpt":0.2908970586844502,"score_spread":0.27559705400838663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295916283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27183735,0.027304824,0.00067079504,0.2014066,0.0038441028,0.0006805312,0.006208087,0.0000946029,0.48795313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48664725,0.011711655,0.0009499278,0.05013744,0.00039990267,0.00017818341,0.0010095789,0.000060145645,0.44890592],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964011,0.0001830789,0.0001006275,0.0002096755,0.0014389151,0.001666602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99647874,0.00038658734,0.00015346725,0.000054883443,0.0013346138,0.0015917411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017802904,0.0003286203,0.00045633395,0.0018324412,0.027278248,0.0054854257,0.0018126976,0.00497354,0.011627337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004397459,0.00062082364,0.00046621368,0.003751357,0.003989452,0.0011790481,0.0023507446,0.006251885,0.000692067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019513819,0.0004709196,0.057702128,0.0005540839,0.000058711084,0.0035722335,0.043501403,0.001411071,0.0016802137,0.37416944,0.3952461,0.12143869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004294528,0.00003905487,0.08102472,0.0003093997,0.000029423874,0.00022613435,0.014364922,0.00047151462,0.00050561316,0.003016859,0.8998737,0.00009572793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99853635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21453132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21453132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3339106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9110323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296345132","doi":"","title":"A Perspective on Ontario's Adult Guardianship Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Law; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Political science; History; Art","score_opus":0.021924101022920327,"score_gpt":0.28558017130026264,"score_spread":0.26365607027734234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296345132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12555632,0.0056695505,0.00062949845,0.11103328,0.0004512304,0.00004893325,0.00029193252,0.000021020875,0.75629824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.809205,0.006030134,0.00046245154,0.017804625,0.00016077742,0.000045483623,0.00007580679,0.000026080916,0.16618972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739,0.00042719796,0.00007248039,0.00017122262,0.0007281741,0.0012109638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974956,0.0005859789,0.00020148845,0.00007624729,0.0006593642,0.0009813992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014736237,0.00023236958,0.00025988868,0.0010718716,0.028840695,0.006839553,0.0012266828,0.0039600707,0.00916698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028123616,0.00028203515,0.0003152971,0.0023191727,0.011542846,0.0028375105,0.003345019,0.0035005847,0.0004122666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038457732,0.000034782985,0.007759587,0.00010365047,0.000006638607,0.0018435785,0.1661935,0.00015628412,0.0003867851,0.76339155,0.0487187,0.01136654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001599067,0.000018980845,0.013085161,0.00026167688,0.000013081423,0.00031292363,0.12275783,0.0001732722,0.00012128068,0.02064789,0.8425469,0.000045028868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9877499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092473224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.092473224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09800762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6709434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296731696","doi":"","title":"Who's the Best Aboriginal? An 'Overlap' and Canadian Constitutionalism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Indigenous; Tribunal; Jurisprudence; Law; Metis; Political science; Constitution; Trespass; Treaty; Indigenous rights; Argument (complex analysis); Human rights; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.00968660414920812,"score_gpt":0.2872372949440118,"score_spread":0.27755069079480366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296731696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13014132,0.00669236,0.0024585563,0.07563197,0.00027834406,0.00006490313,0.0001723659,0.00006241131,0.7844979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9554886,0.0015009696,0.0011491812,0.0041223345,0.000073481366,0.000026081547,0.000052219613,0.000038642276,0.037548516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988937,0.0016497991,0.00020245739,0.0013752031,0.003607655,0.004227801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961052,0.0016748124,0.0002145223,0.00020970622,0.001071935,0.0007238043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057659983,0.0004168873,0.0006320974,0.0021318223,0.05187692,0.014119931,0.0022710974,0.0036796152,0.0059059043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007611483,0.0003535424,0.00043894092,0.004961339,0.048802488,0.00420139,0.008046585,0.005130875,0.0002456862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001294066,0.000005804656,0.0009686793,0.00003943005,0.0000046658984,0.00017599373,0.050912026,0.00015055767,0.00014224937,0.9335725,0.006551107,0.007464125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026859354,0.000025351761,0.0135814175,0.000461996,0.000054533266,0.00036812358,0.14048262,0.001012887,0.0004455621,0.19310795,0.6502697,0.0001629131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9881038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9919704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1565281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1565281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12146826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97830784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297252437","doi":"","title":"L’égalité des couples est- elle une composante des droits fondamentaux?: Réflexion critique à partir des droits français et québécois","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit international et de droit comparé","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0443527536107392,"score_gpt":0.34680182118216724,"score_spread":0.30244906757142803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297252437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46428517,0.028723711,0.0034335023,0.21227755,0.0013434066,0.000078717676,0.00050109735,0.000033435266,0.28932333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96587634,0.0036852355,0.00044872882,0.007878476,0.00013067108,0.00004887424,0.000047389967,0.00003242872,0.02185175],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993152,0.003313483,0.00018176217,0.00063095713,0.0012863457,0.0014354924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840769,0.008513266,0.0010296344,0.0006957314,0.004406847,0.0012776959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009672066,0.0005567826,0.0007602293,0.0031346732,0.025689952,0.013061205,0.0023886042,0.0033099297,0.0078083673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021513598,0.00043566004,0.00041346348,0.0060378816,0.022579437,0.0064220116,0.0053351806,0.005500156,0.0002660326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007434503,0.000030204605,0.018053446,0.0002038668,0.00006385186,0.0004490323,0.5578722,0.00015299513,0.0002025011,0.35587743,0.03014662,0.036873613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017118897,0.000021429278,0.03397758,0.0013379772,0.00007470535,0.00023437363,0.70088965,0.00023459659,0.0002977924,0.015541621,0.2473067,0.00006649724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95083684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96610594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05416181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05416181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055159464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39297324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297723195","doi":"","title":"The Constitutional basis of aboriginal rights","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Law; Settlement (finance); Possession (linguistics); Political science; Supreme court; Legislation; Indigenous rights; Government (linguistics); Negotiation; Virtue; Human rights","score_opus":0.006323626108178241,"score_gpt":0.21448008867665588,"score_spread":0.20815646256847764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297723195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041168798,0.002373528,0.003962686,0.023406174,0.00024528368,0.00009313001,0.00014352587,0.000027417851,0.9285794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.924921,0.0015656819,0.002363602,0.0039533596,0.0002595103,0.000110236666,0.00007397475,0.000023930328,0.066728584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99252844,0.0018941379,0.00029198162,0.00095165014,0.0021394524,0.002194403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995921,0.0016365515,0.0002783126,0.0005815948,0.001117404,0.00046506998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061690854,0.000232913,0.00045521004,0.0010099915,0.012372022,0.008179786,0.0019017761,0.003297573,0.005418827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009041894,0.00040184957,0.0002459316,0.0011448058,0.039026685,0.002673207,0.0037766797,0.0053569023,0.000491199],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017482245,0.00000244215,0.00014489504,0.000007056998,0.0000012191708,0.00004448962,0.0036214644,0.000032143813,0.000058053523,0.9939175,0.0009391263,0.0012298367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030174857,0.000031543703,0.0057660923,0.00040811827,0.000031047908,0.00022379369,0.008202381,0.0004906643,0.0006379382,0.6351898,0.34893656,0.000051783718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33566323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34883633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6643368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015309862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022084275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6674189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298567743","doi":"","title":"Constitutionalized Multiculturalism and the Supreme Court of Canada (ESSAYS IN COMMEMORATION OF THE SEVENTIETH BIRTHDAY OF PROFESSOR OSANAI SATORU)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hōgaku shinpō","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Multiculturalism; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.020520665744205028,"score_gpt":0.2716435066810293,"score_spread":0.2511228409368243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298567743","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08642682,0.033383112,0.0010228391,0.56647503,0.0043090666,0.000080509555,0.0003329766,0.00004060613,0.307929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8221709,0.006220864,0.00057921075,0.09027472,0.0013541692,0.00008151753,0.00006170054,0.000059676084,0.079197235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99191695,0.0010646242,0.00015224838,0.00084085035,0.0015176847,0.004507549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937257,0.002076291,0.000304071,0.0002100233,0.0017897409,0.0018941507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005595202,0.00045654803,0.0007644129,0.0012181284,0.06503724,0.019502336,0.0034249006,0.017872183,0.0051025096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0133468695,0.00073679216,0.00064305984,0.0026589152,0.034216784,0.004774028,0.0062739267,0.017694736,0.00029422296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031893134,0.000023702594,0.0009310635,0.000044217286,0.000020040265,0.00040522445,0.0178988,0.0002532746,0.00018745387,0.8929465,0.082608104,0.0046496247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009128149,0.00002349856,0.014441743,0.0005713331,0.000103284765,0.00016401111,0.052643318,0.0009899931,0.00087115116,0.2482786,0.6815259,0.00029595717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9819588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9912247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12670173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12670173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19083963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9192897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298674345","doi":"10.71781/7838","title":"Parenté fluide : la quête des origines au Brésil et au Québec : dialogue entre parenté, droit et science","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.011470979663765259,"score_gpt":0.22993750026624601,"score_spread":0.21846652060248076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298674345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5002094,0.020701343,0.010707185,0.16683854,0.0011202784,0.00013483079,0.00045205167,0.0001264559,0.29970986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9112815,0.0040503284,0.0015812562,0.004773152,0.00006280239,0.000039395258,0.00006668367,0.00004569302,0.078099094],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982609,0.00075618277,0.000029962875,0.00022093019,0.00038785586,0.00034416866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959663,0.0016172858,0.0002600732,0.00013726583,0.001397678,0.00062144204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029015017,0.00043207034,0.00047445972,0.0012900628,0.018726908,0.008148722,0.0012515128,0.0024652013,0.010103302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040726783,0.00028347335,0.000279562,0.0015318788,0.016960543,0.003838173,0.0030529771,0.0034370911,0.00042045838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042393145,0.00002814676,0.009846893,0.00018296688,0.000021670396,0.0012871105,0.7546205,0.0002309224,0.0014232206,0.18624945,0.012642744,0.033424024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010460906,0.00006327738,0.020138975,0.00051264244,0.00004682261,0.00046819908,0.4256988,0.00054239604,0.0008861777,0.014746919,0.5367902,0.000095090756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9472296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97096336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057100464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057100464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0536508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41429478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299030934","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1293510","title":"Rediscovering Constitutional Law: Succession Upon the Death of the Prime Minister","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Prime minister; Ecological succession; Law; Political science; Prime (order theory); Mathematics; Politics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.016359670584060106,"score_gpt":0.2928749110839194,"score_spread":0.27651524049985926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299030934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36986005,0.0025797498,0.0031732798,0.27074322,0.0050835074,0.0002324183,0.00009603278,0.000103503895,0.3481282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.878481,0.00045279498,0.00055206666,0.032042135,0.0005905988,0.000064354565,0.000022551745,0.000048311216,0.0877461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99062926,0.002275807,0.00020144101,0.00079058396,0.0007260801,0.005376855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932434,0.002971112,0.0005193993,0.00033315693,0.00074967206,0.002183273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013500175,0.00023739274,0.00050745124,0.000647075,0.023633214,0.00828925,0.0020200808,0.01206708,0.010898872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039989892,0.0005243159,0.00046510022,0.0005848508,0.00943399,0.004390625,0.008620583,0.019490303,0.0013202248],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003757772,0.00027557017,0.005387433,0.00011842793,0.000023937992,0.006660864,0.08516848,0.0003815787,0.0017768233,0.72829336,0.13208534,0.03945243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017540398,0.0003442175,0.017903512,0.00033747364,0.000041976287,0.0013599417,0.084827684,0.00080717116,0.0031497385,0.09875212,0.79218227,0.00011844999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04190451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0836565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04190451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008955382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021489654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08332121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299078079","doi":"","title":"Reasonable accommodation for Religion and belief: adding value to Article 9 ECHR and the European Union's anti-discrimination approach to employment?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reasonable accommodation; Accommodation; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); European union; Human rights; Perspective (graphical); Law; Religious discrimination; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.05025288171222708,"score_gpt":0.32137470093876097,"score_spread":0.2711218192265339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299078079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06914462,0.024528332,0.014791574,0.28437862,0.0016537938,0.000074288655,0.00009593013,0.00006697859,0.60526574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9392106,0.003686812,0.0043732487,0.037044927,0.00086639676,0.00006925858,0.00003802462,0.000026107682,0.014684663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9743536,0.015773602,0.0014163988,0.0016345751,0.0041715223,0.0026503853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97598106,0.014833975,0.0025335317,0.0032178985,0.0023715093,0.0010620017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02122098,0.0002431051,0.00082305825,0.0013917192,0.0041257213,0.010864599,0.0025701504,0.012921871,0.0041098297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031419266,0.00027281864,0.00081879256,0.0015134837,0.029671924,0.008753601,0.007183439,0.006776844,0.0005261365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012206286,0.000019517089,0.00041070022,0.000058983736,0.0000050492495,0.00010256001,0.002134997,0.000064208696,0.000063287735,0.9856398,0.0019810745,0.00950758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055063396,0.0001473414,0.0068387827,0.0017498359,0.000049973063,0.00065942586,0.011780586,0.000640759,0.00048983766,0.71638846,0.26109537,0.00010457401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013811002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020286476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02122098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004631872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008473857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11222863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300397219","doi":"","title":"My People's Courts as Agents of Indigenous Decolonisation?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law in context","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Project commissioning; Decolonization; Politics; Law; Treaty; Autonomy; Political science; Government (linguistics); Publishing; Judicial review; Assertion; Economic Justice; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.03678089804619587,"score_gpt":0.3414542548347494,"score_spread":0.3046733567885535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300397219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22250013,0.012024259,0.0026069563,0.1743761,0.0009604607,0.000050053775,0.00003727038,0.00004597334,0.5873988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96734434,0.0025135535,0.00026254196,0.0064133704,0.0005056494,0.000026996004,0.0000089121395,0.00001386843,0.022910697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99499893,0.0023334776,0.00008544401,0.00041063258,0.0005900904,0.0015815179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965019,0.0015190969,0.0006632896,0.00022558492,0.00045574838,0.00063425495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040311394,0.00015032182,0.0002755882,0.0012388345,0.0096118525,0.01248151,0.0011025675,0.0039280234,0.007079857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009771687,0.00029197126,0.00020105092,0.0011945053,0.021372534,0.008945984,0.004590339,0.004183817,0.00048662565],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000086538785,0.000021761947,0.0027138565,0.000031406194,0.0000062181575,0.00044679223,0.18092197,0.000041121642,0.00010806392,0.79490703,0.00880775,0.011985305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037816884,0.000032437594,0.007367763,0.00043169255,0.000023980128,0.0005590351,0.27502483,0.00027996095,0.00038963647,0.21004383,0.50577575,0.00003332647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047348358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05591277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047348358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005999903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062366915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09414548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300948506","doi":"","title":"Ecclesiastical Responsibility for Clerical Wrongdoing","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Wrongdoing; Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Duty; Liability; Jurisprudence; Duty of care; Doctrine; Test (biology); Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Tort","score_opus":0.022077629416080675,"score_gpt":0.340420669153434,"score_spread":0.31834303973735334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300948506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032898504,0.0015569836,0.017679397,0.017923106,0.0006073977,0.000068985784,0.000037144084,0.00005864001,0.9291698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9008894,0.0007904041,0.0032970496,0.003298084,0.0005696728,0.00006765893,0.00002893407,0.00003780122,0.091021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99159765,0.0025316414,0.0004051472,0.0009802288,0.0030380683,0.0014473142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986968,0.005268858,0.0011616758,0.00340178,0.0025391707,0.0006604999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009044612,0.00044224717,0.0003571204,0.0016160989,0.005853492,0.009178477,0.0017735527,0.0076749222,0.012973354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028799405,0.00028749747,0.00039228008,0.00060053496,0.0281796,0.00621544,0.0054255924,0.0052571082,0.0022379435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027792512,0.0000050646636,0.00019021893,0.000004853011,0.000001217977,0.00007892973,0.00110621,0.00006550684,0.000028815386,0.9942405,0.0014638442,0.0028119653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014752846,0.000034383604,0.0013889277,0.00025179426,0.000010949017,0.0007069271,0.0025399344,0.0010293261,0.00042101784,0.800243,0.19331968,0.000039486647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052724285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063178935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012973354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073577934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047833085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301007804","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1225","title":"Socioeconomic Rights Adjudication in Canada: Can the Minimum Core Help in Adjudicating the Rights to Life and Security of the Person under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"BC Cancer Agency","keywords":"Charter; Adjudication; Human rights; Justiciability; Political science; Social rights; Obligation; Right to health; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Reservation of rights; Core (optical fiber); Law and economics; Law; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.025416866768160604,"score_gpt":0.27763242342667305,"score_spread":0.2522155566585124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301007804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27925465,0.010111754,0.012014431,0.30032918,0.0016847892,0.00052738213,0.0010802834,0.00014868744,0.39484885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8988339,0.0042859837,0.008140275,0.027720347,0.00014243202,0.00014634381,0.00027331084,0.00006214934,0.06039542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829974,0.0027384874,0.00054163835,0.00120313,0.0072427914,0.0052765645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817841,0.0058059483,0.00091270334,0.0006182127,0.008541567,0.0023375144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012468804,0.00045056932,0.00054318534,0.002570945,0.036412116,0.011657075,0.0034471785,0.0061901584,0.0038404178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031482,0.00062125275,0.00063946564,0.004190376,0.013023095,0.0040970626,0.0054146238,0.0076732417,0.00024058415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070452414,0.000059058522,0.015698755,0.00019240177,0.000033160308,0.0017842251,0.036868535,0.00084774906,0.0007337878,0.8269829,0.07393301,0.042795934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116359646,0.00009361573,0.07563061,0.0012495663,0.00014916316,0.0007183728,0.092103906,0.007347153,0.002566647,0.109275766,0.7102045,0.00054437655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20895182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20895182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40499836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9175038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301583531","doi":"","title":"Pay Equity: A Fundamental Human Right","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Human rights; Equity (law); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.048318195603266334,"score_gpt":0.32748867441336105,"score_spread":0.2791704788100947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301583531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00972188,0.003031162,0.026676804,0.05513772,0.0010862915,0.000069570306,0.00024478592,0.00009782639,0.903934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7740782,0.0033206022,0.015655573,0.032820117,0.0018664954,0.00019089092,0.0002113254,0.00013263307,0.1717242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99205047,0.001573478,0.00018880141,0.0010080381,0.0035493143,0.0016300684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99691236,0.001235141,0.0002238599,0.00044234947,0.00091998914,0.00026623398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053459583,0.00050244277,0.0005694062,0.0012375743,0.008429422,0.0098150335,0.0020747564,0.0067995307,0.007879517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062459423,0.00033217965,0.00049419183,0.0010601352,0.048552755,0.005870596,0.004463027,0.008534739,0.0011557759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018564361,0.000001951592,0.000060288807,0.0000065508975,6.2689e-7,0.000013149569,0.000566903,0.000029908064,0.000025843929,0.99589515,0.0016266603,0.0017711782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009871383,0.000015538886,0.00096145045,0.00017516561,0.000009737071,0.00008408755,0.0013983112,0.00022417425,0.0003215027,0.75658786,0.24018767,0.000024737046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23773527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23529977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23773527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0152598955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031285577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47270298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302244006","doi":"10.18061/dsq.v36i1.3734","title":"Brokenness / Transformation: Reflections on Academic Critiques of L'Arche","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disability Studies Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14632334688856152,"score_gpt":0.45601841871016224,"score_spread":0.3096950718216007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302244006","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075657934,0.015376597,0.004802898,0.771203,0.0054008286,0.0000855794,0.000049862923,0.000097618766,0.12732567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9240589,0.0040289043,0.0011374961,0.054226287,0.0018412923,0.00012929525,0.00002657804,0.00027642417,0.014274821],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9056384,0.06980627,0.0025588064,0.004245394,0.009781747,0.007969381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8637654,0.10872734,0.006044707,0.0049946243,0.010400369,0.0060675726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07775078,0.0012860426,0.002150946,0.006837995,0.06741533,0.049238518,0.008775706,0.0270613,0.004147149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11915334,0.0010016208,0.0013544222,0.006983261,0.20425782,0.029282438,0.034913052,0.052038174,0.0006789862],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013002701,0.000018046385,0.00019196168,0.000057145084,0.000004328696,0.00029168918,0.6813806,0.00005593765,0.000033421493,0.30469343,0.010899059,0.0023612545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012922457,0.000015481519,0.00028440988,0.0005113772,0.0000064803744,0.00021140304,0.73258847,0.00017186225,0.00018576735,0.06472699,0.20124725,0.000037674217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0410856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0307319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07775078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044583663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024752771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41119033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302347562","doi":"","title":"The Division of Property and Unmarried Cohabitants: The Supreme Court Draws a Line in Nova Scotia (Attorney-General) v. Walsh","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitutionality; Nova scotia; Law; Political science; Charter; Sociology; Ethnology","score_opus":0.018799604003220907,"score_gpt":0.28749624766677007,"score_spread":0.2686966436635492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302347562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49068567,0.008295135,0.0009838609,0.23459753,0.0019344009,0.00008722226,0.00039309333,0.000020902618,0.26300222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92813903,0.00095726416,0.00019070653,0.042842876,0.00026149303,0.00002641938,0.000049789254,0.000011321989,0.027521092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99631315,0.00062051584,0.0000829463,0.00037560603,0.0007101262,0.0018977431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963643,0.0013232266,0.00017777683,0.00014159636,0.00070779753,0.0012852715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026949353,0.00024715086,0.00054958,0.0006788701,0.025794,0.0077902307,0.0023281467,0.007055753,0.0026176933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071370667,0.00036668373,0.0004014095,0.0010809597,0.013060645,0.0017441838,0.0037258286,0.010427245,0.00028450953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012957482,0.00006572315,0.019289626,0.00007411133,0.000037739974,0.0043349657,0.09357287,0.00021714461,0.0011226988,0.76902825,0.094364844,0.0177625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002771701,0.00018860736,0.10882573,0.001631726,0.00022682344,0.0015334161,0.26599976,0.0013930569,0.0029816446,0.09661259,0.52003986,0.0002896502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9296142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9700772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07038581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023724467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041490443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17213386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302387167","doi":"","title":"Twenty Years of Equality Rights: Reclaiming Expectations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Charter; Social equality; Political science; Social rights; Cultural rights; Human rights; Democracy; Law; Corporate governance; Law and economics; Public administration; International human rights law; Sociology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.027560441343334702,"score_gpt":0.3340070092693359,"score_spread":0.3064465679260012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302387167","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011743365,0.038317613,0.0039197803,0.7599447,0.0077105626,0.00006740541,0.00019156234,0.0000820382,0.17802297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53053486,0.037465807,0.0058239624,0.23115379,0.004181469,0.0001482805,0.0002704075,0.00024323368,0.19017819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9727399,0.004945719,0.00081383996,0.0016325722,0.014198867,0.005669165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798989,0.0043911263,0.00066108955,0.00088998105,0.010017264,0.004141568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021361979,0.00043114627,0.0005336206,0.0016265853,0.017691156,0.023554025,0.0023964776,0.0076568513,0.0043521402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023955377,0.00049023854,0.0005666186,0.001614547,0.0431768,0.009862672,0.0060104914,0.014353367,0.0006961935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015477599,0.000012126514,0.00050380337,0.000057558813,0.000004460346,0.00014671411,0.017772693,0.00016138998,0.00014748005,0.8508737,0.11171352,0.01859116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065262066,0.000009696368,0.0011789438,0.00032780218,0.0000047343065,0.00003689201,0.008420283,0.000090733956,0.00011775959,0.035777304,0.9539976,0.00003170805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8730606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90991586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8730606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14948124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20695965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9864812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302390928","doi":"","title":"Not So Simple after All: A Comment on Ravndahl v. Saskatchewan","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Plaintiff; Law; Political science; Statute of limitations; Supreme court; Charter; Constitution; Legislation; Statutory law","score_opus":0.016314799651238665,"score_gpt":0.30375050612404636,"score_spread":0.2874357064728077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302390928","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019275242,0.010101803,0.00050210406,0.8058393,0.00882843,0.0002896458,0.001670517,0.00021258285,0.15328033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042842995,0.0041372334,0.0004927644,0.8403085,0.0014905173,0.0002295073,0.00032158504,0.00010526527,0.11007168],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99242085,0.0012111486,0.00062918826,0.001246157,0.002066459,0.0024262725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98654664,0.008466273,0.00040399807,0.0005077669,0.0027170083,0.0013583455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008172899,0.0014027555,0.0014043428,0.0017472326,0.02420753,0.010875344,0.0103939045,0.049785122,0.013694012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01799997,0.0023072064,0.0025265168,0.0031815548,0.009276301,0.0042034034,0.0046407864,0.04932957,0.004325232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019733798,0.00008645997,0.0033208265,0.00032145873,0.00009233279,0.003366391,0.0078104194,0.0005543979,0.0016909043,0.10994069,0.86020315,0.012415763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001971258,0.000098208744,0.010263666,0.0016813871,0.0001629577,0.00066224154,0.012477552,0.0007139641,0.0012982057,0.016882956,0.9550545,0.00050714787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91273296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95861083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08726704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044368695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12619285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32191896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302925434","doi":"","title":"The True North Strong and Free?: the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms' Impact on Homelessness","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parity","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Bill of rights; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.02624246557546174,"score_gpt":0.28460383425826563,"score_spread":0.2583613686828039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302925434","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1055566,0.017617011,0.0016915454,0.53620344,0.0021209226,0.00006214375,0.0005889987,0.000043910088,0.33611536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96048677,0.0042266953,0.0008032651,0.016862396,0.00019536716,0.00003639066,0.00006957638,0.00003177266,0.017287886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99102414,0.0015735357,0.00015377821,0.00044290847,0.0029143526,0.003891277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99183404,0.0027546252,0.00051295175,0.00031820938,0.002246414,0.002333876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006913879,0.0003512723,0.00055436895,0.0019792477,0.026117994,0.010926934,0.0021745667,0.0034226666,0.0069020237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017407428,0.0002870891,0.00038760228,0.0036614307,0.027293032,0.0040420224,0.0069458378,0.007343087,0.00017695576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003479966,0.00001745034,0.004405952,0.00011677005,0.000009878313,0.00019172589,0.03871103,0.00019707491,0.0001550433,0.8585429,0.057348166,0.040269244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005773794,0.00004953427,0.09756714,0.001752877,0.00009460576,0.00032351207,0.18225674,0.0008715097,0.0005683843,0.13507998,0.5810456,0.000332366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9890899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9943111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089349635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.089349635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2012924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2303265657","doi":"","title":"Equality Rights and the Charter: Reconceptualizing State Accountability for Ending Domestic Violence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Domestic violence; Redress; Political science; Human rights; Law; State (computer science); Sexual violence; International human rights law; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.021331843220529997,"score_gpt":0.32628815014833373,"score_spread":0.30495630692780373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2303265657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030751355,0.005182513,0.11017478,0.3907179,0.003257866,0.00038122255,0.00020850978,0.00053422607,0.4587916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.927376,0.001783756,0.023422524,0.018433062,0.000706557,0.00026940973,0.00008588372,0.00018548798,0.027737385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9620207,0.015734904,0.0011110577,0.0031381024,0.009854534,0.00814074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97813076,0.008936426,0.0012444659,0.0026269013,0.0060920706,0.002969307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043734983,0.00071399397,0.0008469913,0.0034794805,0.020808386,0.023415785,0.004536252,0.008641853,0.006129667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05996652,0.0006252362,0.0009429214,0.0026873872,0.063295886,0.015309891,0.015556255,0.014223756,0.0004305095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052855685,0.000008503277,0.0002950434,0.000019844683,0.0000046212554,0.000028522163,0.006334476,0.00052572426,0.00006175264,0.977843,0.0049200077,0.009953078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043059787,0.00003229778,0.0018511405,0.00051650486,0.000037436723,0.00003786241,0.010089886,0.0022081456,0.0006400138,0.7655206,0.21892162,0.00010135591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65708506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7087931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65708506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07962483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2017888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6898688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2304592484","doi":"","title":"Innes , Robert Alexander − Elder Brother and the Law of the People: Contemporary Kinship and Cowessess First Nation.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Histoire sociale","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kinship; Brother; Genealogy; Law; Sociology; History; Political science","score_opus":0.03034802104174251,"score_gpt":0.25144571455794673,"score_spread":0.22109769351620423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2304592484","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008782762,0.4622123,0.0004669024,0.40240225,0.009654967,0.000037053258,0.00015396938,0.00003654374,0.11625323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27620822,0.32233495,0.0012165006,0.113249026,0.0053987834,0.00017785114,0.00014099957,0.000099466204,0.28117424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992138,0.00038590387,0.000050073322,0.000068244764,0.0001794938,0.00010244577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978248,0.0013562263,0.00013142827,0.000065532484,0.00033565497,0.00028641272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016467174,0.000547945,0.00040384193,0.00097038964,0.008451771,0.0042089494,0.0012769568,0.0060809995,0.0095562665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004465797,0.00045488772,0.0002174256,0.0015938962,0.0054497193,0.0067816623,0.002461488,0.005065323,0.0013413477],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041996194,0.00005020413,0.0012265434,0.00023529718,0.0000076293018,0.0004241724,0.023055326,0.00006861149,0.00013241186,0.21849886,0.71471065,0.041548267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012818043,0.00001806979,0.0047841724,0.001156042,0.000009770312,0.00026877,0.030388076,0.00003562052,0.00015761735,0.04419269,0.91895944,0.000016845017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066664964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1741041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93333507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028140775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004479579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13255388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305078174","doi":"","title":"Supreme Court of Canada Orders Legalization of Physician Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia Carter v. Canada (Attorney General) 2015 SCC 5","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Homicide; Political science; Legislation; Assisted suicide; Medicine; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.019332433594327705,"score_gpt":0.2780323331402446,"score_spread":0.25869989954591693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305078174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029275324,0.009236309,0.0017675308,0.11319518,0.0041200863,0.00062934065,0.0057018655,0.00037856656,0.83569574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24615431,0.0046123434,0.0027987375,0.17135896,0.0009994244,0.00034167015,0.0018977677,0.00015084226,0.57168597],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937401,0.00031641734,0.00018711312,0.00041534362,0.0032149954,0.002126025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952826,0.00081623456,0.0001622166,0.0001463435,0.0027420663,0.0008505745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024063727,0.0005693107,0.0005150351,0.0014781436,0.015822193,0.006462335,0.0021510997,0.013378058,0.0124957645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008123971,0.000810692,0.00084696145,0.001364462,0.0033182919,0.0010489713,0.0017876483,0.007403084,0.001636433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006249369,0.00005402929,0.0036445262,0.00010022729,0.000028864468,0.0008240899,0.0016113524,0.00044609208,0.0007518262,0.30157173,0.6769487,0.013955981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005788478,0.000027643437,0.007269097,0.00033928722,0.000052677453,0.00014566227,0.00090511027,0.0006126301,0.0005446857,0.0078112455,0.98213255,0.00010149653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98406225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99450606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07113136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07113136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18708035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5160966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305847384","doi":"","title":"Lessons From History: The Recent Applicability of Matrimonial Property and Human Rights Legislation on Reserve Lands in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Redress; Indigenous; Political science; Law; Property (philosophy); Legislature; Supreme court; Tribunal; Property rights; Real property","score_opus":0.1399922365267671,"score_gpt":0.332261434246538,"score_spread":0.19226919771977088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305847384","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1406142,0.064329654,0.0011379943,0.48128176,0.0031664087,0.000098198776,0.0014886458,0.0000640214,0.30781916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8357478,0.0402302,0.0013245402,0.05932853,0.0006460501,0.000036511385,0.00039502495,0.00008478149,0.062206455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947266,0.00050363934,0.00013417639,0.0005682875,0.0018298463,0.0022373886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99261886,0.0014370406,0.00035577395,0.00016284526,0.0036315774,0.0017939538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034849723,0.00025887278,0.0004424432,0.002293193,0.0253449,0.010328796,0.0025046305,0.0031207425,0.009169926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009198665,0.0004744871,0.00045886458,0.0049105827,0.0141218295,0.0032443472,0.0029819256,0.006171343,0.00029332863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015884322,0.00010056607,0.031524308,0.0008397167,0.00008093112,0.0032187097,0.05356467,0.0018021882,0.0007445511,0.52273256,0.19464117,0.19059171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020448775,0.000027426711,0.049157903,0.0008429604,0.000051663097,0.00032830497,0.042603776,0.00047137303,0.00041217607,0.012583339,0.8933534,0.00014731968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9982168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99939454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2581415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2581415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3153009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86045074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W230801979","doi":"","title":"All Who Minister: New Ways of Serving God's People","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Protestantism; Economic Justice; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Religious studies; Theology; Law; History; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.10762265324272592,"score_gpt":0.3515973416502959,"score_spread":0.24397468840756997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W230801979","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029013099,0.5476971,0.00095269736,0.15378949,0.015752628,0.00007097656,0.00017797787,0.00027141,0.2783864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.066320814,0.18450393,0.0018920116,0.024722388,0.0028664584,0.000112450936,0.00018776717,0.00041594196,0.71897817],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993925,0.00027544625,0.000017305694,0.00004660277,0.00014376036,0.00012429953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996252,0.00006947444,0.000027572314,0.000017836472,0.0000798285,0.0001800834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011355657,0.00073841313,0.00039164844,0.00069472514,0.005849545,0.0062822946,0.0008031827,0.0018594761,0.019843152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010413284,0.0005645821,0.00026076334,0.001045599,0.0032591994,0.005019478,0.0029058508,0.004702455,0.0068630558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008692426,0.000012306826,0.00012697482,0.00017849049,0.000002538277,0.00008475407,0.022004383,0.000016140772,0.00007846263,0.025040707,0.9212753,0.031171229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002109917,0.000003521658,0.0003400951,0.0002694667,0.0000012997309,0.00007983003,0.009431711,0.000007370756,0.000014611003,0.0018818296,0.9879643,0.0000038728153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05637911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20224456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05637911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051076487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008658831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11210191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2310529507","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2753167","title":"The Parameters of a Charter Compliant Response to Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 5","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01684129724260358,"score_gpt":0.2847775032449265,"score_spread":0.26793620600232293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2310529507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035990052,0.0012884128,0.0037017995,0.19254412,0.0052652336,0.0031437713,0.006574481,0.0015622308,0.7499299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29842517,0.0005590503,0.006842524,0.24913095,0.0013863691,0.0018649233,0.0020961137,0.00039907065,0.4392959],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9699174,0.005547835,0.0015276071,0.0014699163,0.014953763,0.0065834373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9734597,0.008387805,0.0012420537,0.0014342536,0.013283629,0.0021925967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01823336,0.00066348765,0.00069643906,0.0020930255,0.011068225,0.013158508,0.0042380383,0.031021435,0.027033228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07687196,0.0011100327,0.0009438773,0.0012439656,0.0034693878,0.0029478665,0.0026229688,0.010958208,0.008498986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011174341,0.000096685755,0.0030142926,0.00007404456,0.000015079491,0.00039944332,0.0011945886,0.0006397582,0.0007432264,0.083595335,0.9012458,0.008870108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013375102,0.00018642133,0.024508426,0.0007577233,0.000064447486,0.00021311578,0.004189946,0.0015827931,0.0019221778,0.02282733,0.94328266,0.00033132877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5712014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75318724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42879862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034631938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08357138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8626478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312177042","doi":"","title":"Thomas Torrance's Mediations and Revelation by Titus Chung (review)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revelation; Philosophy; Literature; Art; History; Theology","score_opus":0.016700958542284355,"score_gpt":0.3078282451627417,"score_spread":0.29112728662045734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312177042","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000047571248,0.97535443,0.00003100356,0.022263812,0.0019495907,0.000004746817,0.000006810521,0.0000013208944,0.0003406331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002448057,0.96988064,0.00011632362,0.022205144,0.004265824,0.000037911654,0.000013828013,0.0000055079363,0.0010267908],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99504566,0.00255885,0.0004909247,0.00039684775,0.001237736,0.00026995878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98014164,0.016755808,0.0011414129,0.00028796864,0.0011442908,0.00052887195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008005626,0.00089375937,0.002075406,0.0040623248,0.0018462859,0.004540136,0.0015669456,0.0077701877,0.0041539688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035992768,0.0006594631,0.0008544189,0.0050275787,0.0063890507,0.0061718607,0.0040182183,0.006984409,0.0008418775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015838284,0.000037363578,0.0003260863,0.02155077,0.0003065308,0.0004503443,0.001933804,0.0001979187,0.000116268544,0.022904443,0.74658537,0.20543277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012317233,0.00005060226,0.0011334948,0.032586146,0.00028464684,0.001509651,0.001013192,0.000060023398,0.00011366512,0.01051729,0.9525442,0.00006402297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02301897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0366493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02301897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040427865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014951165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04576993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313184770","doi":"10.1086/678879","title":": <i>John Gower and the Limits of the Law</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Law; History; Law and economics; Art; Art history; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01984888938963204,"score_gpt":0.27983637644399845,"score_spread":0.2599874870543664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313184770","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015259599,0.05530042,0.00020674421,0.8946799,0.004978914,0.00000967164,0.000057573143,0.000023862574,0.04321696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.096096285,0.08913276,0.0009606032,0.5413155,0.0124589065,0.00007490962,0.000107620355,0.00031107385,0.25954232],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983071,0.0007406476,0.00006693117,0.00022701985,0.0004973417,0.00016098625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951407,0.002953912,0.00029531386,0.00017092645,0.0009230535,0.0005161271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028934209,0.00064137485,0.00053967786,0.0015141482,0.010753875,0.0065419017,0.0013834784,0.009016295,0.014912021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0101463515,0.00043768287,0.00029771682,0.0023946783,0.0105060665,0.014045958,0.0042033973,0.00844506,0.0030878286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007170279,0.000008755266,0.00023133995,0.00007641641,0.0000040905156,0.0000950034,0.0057227053,0.000024385794,0.000047839916,0.0764428,0.9130005,0.004338903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007669947,0.000004379638,0.0009698113,0.00045620775,0.0000054965144,0.00012946334,0.013426324,0.0000388933,0.000116081945,0.038606748,0.9462127,0.000026207203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07021528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17001563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07021528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004008503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050359913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13961315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313502888","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100006840","title":"Consent and Sexual Violence in Canadian Public Discourse: Reflections on<i>Ewanchuk</i>","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.050584916637055506,"score_gpt":0.3301268284584821,"score_spread":0.2795419118214266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313502888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2709289,0.029616583,0.001698234,0.27756193,0.002876191,0.00016670827,0.00036497155,0.00008645527,0.4167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9242597,0.0069686146,0.00047255162,0.014341134,0.00022949936,0.00006286682,0.000059143462,0.0000753526,0.053531133],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893289,0.0033175186,0.0003554178,0.00066749664,0.003087473,0.0032431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98773324,0.0071632056,0.0006462511,0.00031887667,0.002806484,0.0013319621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009334679,0.00061749894,0.0006972559,0.003103172,0.052558303,0.018593479,0.002081768,0.0066502388,0.008625369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014371207,0.00055161153,0.0005655109,0.0049444935,0.04199321,0.005960018,0.0081075495,0.00864376,0.000514102],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029790615,0.000014952147,0.00086683495,0.00017562114,0.0000046471087,0.0004887283,0.81483006,0.000060132345,0.00035218097,0.15587568,0.01822034,0.009081013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007640105,0.000007940831,0.0031776414,0.00042517507,0.000011235058,0.00010138599,0.6214174,0.0000639281,0.00028916437,0.0058385218,0.36859515,0.00006481244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9737567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9802198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17173247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17173247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15428539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9606729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315422183","doi":"10.1097/01.aog.0000287614.63474.3c","title":"A Skirt for a Life?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Obstetrics and Gynecology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Courage; Medicine; EPIC; Childbirth; Art history; Genealogy; Pregnancy; Law; Literature; History; Art","score_opus":0.043753891859252415,"score_gpt":0.31906745712990975,"score_spread":0.2753135652706573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315422183","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017768003,0.0057457704,0.00004660232,0.77457774,0.18977955,0.00005618488,0.00014871002,0.00005644439,0.029411316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002665184,0.0057464256,0.00012593047,0.74252737,0.12211128,0.00007765102,0.00012250169,0.00005015884,0.1265734],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988274,0.0002445047,0.00010677454,0.00011123909,0.0005238334,0.00018627921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818265,0.00069332676,0.00011658377,0.000041221545,0.00059330533,0.00037290124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012957352,0.0012483656,0.00086298963,0.00095998833,0.0042328173,0.0023500388,0.0015222301,0.020709408,0.040297486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008331964,0.00047325168,0.00093966,0.00061317,0.0012404639,0.0023451552,0.0010273791,0.017381968,0.0282989],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056359704,0.000004504663,0.000029420828,0.000018749695,0.0000012785323,0.0001402032,0.000025955273,0.00000427887,0.000010857341,0.00027669605,0.99796766,0.0015148098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000141065675,0.000010135794,0.00048904936,0.00017795379,0.0000052256605,0.00033547345,0.00021553901,0.000024750312,0.000030163887,0.0006519262,0.9980373,0.000008271694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01793924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028404018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040297486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003431058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030928263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13480848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317453487","doi":"10.7202/1027259ar","title":"Élodie Petit, Cellules souches embryonnaires : droit, éthique et convergence, Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2003, 147 pages, ISBN 2-89400-169-X Alain Roy, Le contrat de mariage réinventé, Perspectives socio-juridiques pour une réforme, Montréal, Les Éditions Thémis, 2002, 455 pages, ISBN 2-89400-149-5","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Convergence (economics); Art; Sociology; Art history; Economics","score_opus":0.018096078631578,"score_gpt":0.24992360528592816,"score_spread":0.23182752665435016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317453487","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010273181,0.79938495,0.0013789631,0.049076404,0.003107516,0.00002765473,0.0005478907,0.00012912365,0.14532028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028506462,0.5527027,0.0022933632,0.008343953,0.0024455553,0.00008536766,0.0006854182,0.00031271152,0.40462437],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878675,0.00030132968,0.00005954144,0.00014843776,0.00054196065,0.00016199141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984452,0.0006318083,0.0001526471,0.00009393881,0.00046888602,0.00020765845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015372195,0.001217448,0.0008411899,0.002976323,0.003388817,0.0074419635,0.0019592834,0.0030970927,0.06401116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030488695,0.0009021651,0.000513061,0.0070522097,0.0059840837,0.0068257907,0.0021480566,0.004037372,0.011855623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025489353,0.000020787582,0.0006151611,0.00080614735,0.000017677727,0.00010525982,0.0055980803,0.0001477698,0.0002705118,0.07512468,0.8276308,0.08963769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057257002,0.00000496447,0.0021072847,0.00053690496,0.0000064022206,0.00015458337,0.0019736108,0.00003940374,0.00009221857,0.0066634845,0.98839915,0.000016186152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4367897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63130176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4367897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020910285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015344853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8684946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318075694","doi":"10.5840/chesterton2004303/466","title":"Judicial Activism: A Threat to Democracy and Religion, Fr. Alphonse de Valk C.S.B., general editor; and Borowski: A Canadian Paradox, by Lianne Laurence","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Chesterton Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Religious studies; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Theology; Politics","score_opus":0.017157626343207603,"score_gpt":0.30371028417381635,"score_spread":0.28655265783060874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318075694","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025668443,0.6725547,0.000059438826,0.31347883,0.008052722,0.000003254146,0.000050854396,0.0000049561486,0.005538557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03228335,0.82536024,0.00034604358,0.08825819,0.03390686,0.00001835396,0.00009460472,0.000031303065,0.019701041],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957807,0.0011523946,0.000205934,0.00035157197,0.0020242012,0.0004851647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98844415,0.006110296,0.0008991258,0.00025304282,0.0034661037,0.0008272139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007434563,0.0008450445,0.0013674931,0.00391839,0.0054116845,0.00934453,0.002610155,0.010111976,0.004930007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018351289,0.00056143245,0.000599767,0.0067236545,0.012346928,0.0054306043,0.001857067,0.0065400954,0.0008377467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002048217,0.0000065156078,0.00035748738,0.0005784487,0.000026951102,0.00015926536,0.0010671411,0.000110054956,0.00003655157,0.039475236,0.9262938,0.031868126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021663926,0.000007892585,0.0027641612,0.0024491807,0.00003329866,0.00019507448,0.0021190245,0.00007248328,0.00008473095,0.02704547,0.96518064,0.000026389082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5267049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.716792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4732951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021125646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04427505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9521648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318457681","doi":"","title":"The Best Interests of the Child in Relocation Disputes: England and Wales, and Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UCL Discovery (University College London)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Adversarial system; Political science; Settlement (finance); Mediation; Statute; Supreme court; Best interests; Law; Normative; Norm (philosophy); Business","score_opus":0.009390052194429704,"score_gpt":0.22812635038529389,"score_spread":0.21873629819086418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318457681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8085519,0.049247295,0.0007492597,0.02700698,0.00047268337,0.00026581035,0.0009014195,0.000023939523,0.11278067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95994204,0.014149903,0.00074348215,0.0046276567,0.00003306838,0.00006069875,0.00030607017,0.00002468061,0.020112358],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99190485,0.0013310794,0.00037203022,0.0006274641,0.00195858,0.0038059638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865421,0.0034227124,0.0010828571,0.0002728214,0.004338705,0.0043407767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047601154,0.00033356837,0.00085216586,0.0033674254,0.020235253,0.009772846,0.002815068,0.0023900478,0.005566595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015677087,0.0006650504,0.0004511459,0.007555568,0.0068793064,0.0025081735,0.0059579336,0.0036775074,0.00032011876],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005734413,0.00018968039,0.11647592,0.0026931744,0.00015644304,0.01689997,0.49646133,0.0013165777,0.0017331438,0.1527809,0.042137094,0.16858236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054321015,0.000102045975,0.16007416,0.0026832088,0.000083994695,0.0023414686,0.5585306,0.0003317246,0.00034227653,0.003673296,0.2715633,0.00021953965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99631125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15957634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15957634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26351926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97477233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318512819","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007249","title":"Judicial Justification of Recent Developments in Aboriginal Law","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Jurisprudence; Law; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.037825268685473874,"score_gpt":0.2964190730157875,"score_spread":0.25859380433031365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318512819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12088455,0.016469182,0.0020479131,0.0538179,0.0006771688,0.00006878932,0.00021182763,0.000056017885,0.8057666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9406658,0.0060026767,0.00096449256,0.0036957497,0.0004430731,0.000022809743,0.000065271066,0.000012367381,0.048127826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661344,0.00088429364,0.00011541263,0.00029792276,0.0013485219,0.0007403902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911925,0.0035163483,0.0005612518,0.00050049217,0.0038487187,0.0003807431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044551697,0.00019240353,0.00022333777,0.0019162629,0.008499389,0.0068787523,0.0014279758,0.0027483262,0.004207155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010819566,0.0002367095,0.0002236363,0.0015530518,0.012379172,0.0011560958,0.0017145313,0.0040861713,0.0002279331],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013843372,0.000008421015,0.00083445344,0.00007421601,0.000008280923,0.00031480874,0.011108489,0.00033834853,0.00029568924,0.97140056,0.0076376433,0.0079652155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044871325,0.0000642418,0.018966645,0.0009559586,0.00010529122,0.00036799416,0.017731424,0.0015344024,0.0022393113,0.14051819,0.81739026,0.00008153021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67012835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8259371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32987165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03970998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028679369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6636287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320896844","doi":"10.1017/s0008423914000250","title":"Aboriginal Justice and the Charter David Milward Vancouver: UBC Press, 2012, pp. 332.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ontario Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Economic Justice; Political science; Content (measure theory); Media studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.017337701558968875,"score_gpt":0.3046572690903523,"score_spread":0.28731956753138344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320896844","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041088457,0.55863094,0.0003541673,0.095461406,0.0055074845,0.00003056578,0.0014554091,0.00013132904,0.3343199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051908437,0.13462357,0.00073708565,0.0053829844,0.0011955857,0.00004237628,0.0007391369,0.00021419566,0.8051567],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926335,0.00015683284,0.000035483063,0.0000693594,0.00029812634,0.00017683492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904865,0.00018189834,0.000063753025,0.000050466275,0.00045983802,0.00019546265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001044561,0.0008268692,0.00048515928,0.001693102,0.012250666,0.007545027,0.0012460835,0.0024688896,0.04076889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029282977,0.0006956868,0.00022535016,0.004420109,0.0027722495,0.0027528086,0.0012250008,0.003653325,0.0073167216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020087979,0.000010111684,0.0005027635,0.0001858888,0.000004805856,0.00013297751,0.005934746,0.000054955388,0.00006211767,0.020052979,0.92374235,0.049296226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020973866,0.0000028542445,0.0032362437,0.00037745584,0.000004807179,0.00007695184,0.0064499257,0.000018490011,0.00004626633,0.0018118251,0.9879645,0.000008621513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83735037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9654826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98044294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019557046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028594896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32721496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321298248","doi":"10.1017/s071498080000458x","title":"David Snowdon. Aging with Grace: What the Nun Study Teaches Us about Leading Longer, Healthier, and More Meaningful Lives. New York: Bantam Books, 2001.","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.0314946212679264,"score_gpt":0.2672168636944449,"score_spread":0.2357222424265185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321298248","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014402445,0.8239726,0.0008682014,0.13821714,0.007237555,0.00004929294,0.00025973708,0.00004577734,0.027909381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038127538,0.8568534,0.0020243677,0.036745556,0.0030156246,0.000268472,0.00023981089,0.0001522384,0.06257297],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976636,0.001394357,0.00014306114,0.00017582327,0.00048011309,0.00014303891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947772,0.0030621307,0.0003131735,0.00016748077,0.00082443136,0.0008555946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004293621,0.001258133,0.0006287154,0.0035284027,0.006007216,0.0038261316,0.0018685422,0.0032209454,0.009938502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058717257,0.0010770792,0.0004627147,0.004149653,0.007160469,0.012360915,0.002528629,0.005141289,0.0029872651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034499564,0.00003776392,0.0014463343,0.000997601,0.000009784035,0.00023580606,0.040365435,0.000030791958,0.00009486354,0.029828055,0.8325224,0.09439669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013337733,0.000021784082,0.0038641705,0.0031390071,0.000009822396,0.00024192788,0.032394286,0.000030067882,0.00009711929,0.016597604,0.9435632,0.000027639904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.110909395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3106818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110909395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042529753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009315027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22052765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322028740","doi":"10.1080/14622459.2015.1119447","title":"Johannes Oecolampadius. An Exposition of Genesis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reformation and Renaissance Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exposition (narrative); The Renaissance; Philosophy; Theology; Art; Classics; Art history; Literature","score_opus":0.07670250506852559,"score_gpt":0.35806172363447863,"score_spread":0.28135921856595303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322028740","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009935321,0.84751266,0.0005564357,0.056228064,0.009052768,0.000023605828,0.00016885689,0.000016155172,0.085448004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.067657344,0.6974005,0.0015868235,0.048946243,0.008356902,0.00022050965,0.00033286505,0.0001340007,0.17536484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990088,0.00039092294,0.00005325688,0.00009065299,0.0003021527,0.00015424873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990382,0.00062122586,0.00009996747,0.000038293518,0.00015254867,0.000049846898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012114501,0.0011121951,0.00045533432,0.0041411906,0.002555493,0.0029180453,0.001002819,0.0038331628,0.011765339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026704634,0.00045690482,0.00043143696,0.005000889,0.004786373,0.005287916,0.002670333,0.0041304715,0.0032356263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027866608,0.000023325561,0.00022595978,0.0008757653,0.0000131422685,0.0002132906,0.005959735,0.00010270209,0.00018414532,0.38170975,0.5767069,0.0339573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026169264,0.0000038320336,0.00050212,0.00086231256,0.0000024342191,0.00006505446,0.00061106257,0.0000135500795,0.000053807922,0.014483637,0.9833946,0.000004866491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016741477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02504823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016741477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004161317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022081188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039358974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322625235","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007286","title":"Raven's Garden: A Discussion about Aboriginal Sexual Orientation and Transgender Issues","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sexual orientation; Sociology; Art; Gender studies","score_opus":0.024161955878004696,"score_gpt":0.2980185104206962,"score_spread":0.27385655454269153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322625235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15305948,0.08084593,0.0022540274,0.32174665,0.0079333475,0.00007598352,0.000103378574,0.000060449085,0.43392074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80914384,0.033829156,0.0012815999,0.031525366,0.0022247974,0.00007222256,0.00002984345,0.000063779844,0.12182938],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819165,0.0011803713,0.00003464388,0.00015094364,0.00018671057,0.00025571033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859744,0.00089705404,0.00012295063,0.00007015042,0.00013443567,0.00017801751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003574941,0.00034128106,0.00039866182,0.0010167379,0.012410096,0.0056025796,0.00128811,0.0038410525,0.0064846864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029653343,0.00021510645,0.00044544216,0.0009905915,0.017521422,0.0045206314,0.0036396594,0.005096348,0.00036840906],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019389005,0.000014797747,0.0008597291,0.00020566133,0.0000062931936,0.0011124782,0.5187002,0.00009440921,0.000167301,0.45031705,0.01714014,0.01136261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076188007,0.000044403067,0.0029328703,0.0008990297,0.000014405025,0.0006750096,0.41808313,0.000087555534,0.0001550952,0.029779691,0.54729134,0.000029823323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14181037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21679683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85818964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005785167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00632498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28196985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323209304","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4481","title":"The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Implications for the Equality Rights of Canadians with Disabilities: The Case for Education","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Political science; Balance (ability); Convention; Order (exchange); Human rights; Law; Public administration; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.11678599316186042,"score_gpt":0.37101095248984167,"score_spread":0.2542249593279813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323209304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009381932,0.021877194,0.0029781035,0.236182,0.004469906,0.00015335636,0.00040273988,0.000037783087,0.7245169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3930491,0.034888256,0.013069664,0.16869451,0.001823561,0.00039538217,0.00044314668,0.0001774685,0.3874589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800711,0.002867877,0.000494522,0.0011419959,0.01011995,0.00530445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99081844,0.0028886779,0.00040480745,0.00049694604,0.0036707928,0.0017203455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014164394,0.0006843494,0.00075581926,0.0025241335,0.035196893,0.01175987,0.003127693,0.01295867,0.0064911996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016898697,0.00048038835,0.00065288245,0.0038009556,0.02996256,0.0051448066,0.006239784,0.013135771,0.00068885455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010297144,0.000014757377,0.0004580663,0.000051278003,0.0000043985124,0.00021089162,0.009687693,0.00011427084,0.00012451533,0.89423794,0.078020856,0.017065143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060478687,0.000009844466,0.001547951,0.0004141815,0.000008381146,0.00010994856,0.0058014295,0.00009217692,0.00010778947,0.027523467,0.9643078,0.00007099733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97430634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9812816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06454454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06454454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20952235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46830565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324646733","doi":"10.7202/1035298ar","title":"L’atteinte à la vie familiale au Québec : premier mouvement","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02111040583805925,"score_gpt":0.27059360332440036,"score_spread":0.2494831974863411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324646733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45130557,0.015343113,0.0035514603,0.060788997,0.00053951796,0.00008366763,0.0022614673,0.00008351553,0.4660427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9042953,0.0028697934,0.0009241675,0.0021804615,0.000036168716,0.00003778953,0.00032348957,0.000026847054,0.089305826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992582,0.00014659285,0.000016208802,0.000086498534,0.00019520315,0.00029724842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980196,0.00022381824,0.00013731341,0.000076385906,0.0011175502,0.0004254528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058879505,0.00021572757,0.0001731737,0.0010558903,0.007940484,0.0030472004,0.0005435466,0.000771072,0.012565712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021413064,0.00013433276,0.00016264767,0.0017348216,0.002789486,0.0011174966,0.0008558244,0.0013741048,0.00038889807],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113968854,0.00006655331,0.11360392,0.0004492209,0.00007412601,0.0010194281,0.11719514,0.0014341931,0.0014011224,0.45175382,0.1383399,0.17454863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012025275,0.000033618624,0.31754243,0.00064303627,0.000042970507,0.00020824064,0.05473283,0.00084115926,0.00047045038,0.0060822284,0.61930853,0.000082476814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.994177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051371783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051371783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052050978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37273014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325254138","doi":"10.1177/0037768611402609","title":"Souffrances sociales, parler ordinaire, imaginaires religieux et expression politique","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Social Compass","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.10833119374504901,"score_gpt":0.35214440336960845,"score_spread":0.24381320962455943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325254138","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11499277,0.013189033,0.011372927,0.047795184,0.0006293801,0.00004855448,0.00009764465,0.000095833595,0.8117787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9459501,0.0026093929,0.0010882041,0.0019876156,0.00022656067,0.000047971702,0.000034415352,0.00007072618,0.047985088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.993411,0.004544104,0.00014998067,0.00053026056,0.0008124776,0.00055220077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761343,0.0010566988,0.0004946601,0.00031541262,0.00026513785,0.0002547696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034681088,0.0005487143,0.0003288193,0.0009221028,0.006750291,0.012152211,0.00062566414,0.002099704,0.008528938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035736132,0.00028152147,0.00031707712,0.001339977,0.044091307,0.0053436765,0.0050407606,0.004292176,0.00097604626],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024329143,0.000016036047,0.00094258116,0.00007145538,0.00000904795,0.00015357879,0.084890105,0.00007854682,0.0005451419,0.9006728,0.0033313325,0.009265133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033380846,0.00007927507,0.007723943,0.0005396857,0.000028504972,0.0005097906,0.09232785,0.0003666363,0.0010457976,0.28613177,0.61115265,0.000060674705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010926485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01004175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012152211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052891807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036087295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038375854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325547125","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007237","title":"From<i>Terra Nullius</i>to Affirmation: Reconciling Aboriginal Rights with the Canadian Constitution","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Doctrine; Constitution; Ethnology; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.02269755689766165,"score_gpt":0.26277316525921873,"score_spread":0.24007560836155709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325547125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085333645,0.0071394625,0.0029837387,0.047030736,0.00035676334,0.00004642382,0.00014264933,0.00004513953,0.85692155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95247066,0.0024829719,0.0012951683,0.0023831949,0.00007166323,0.000023412187,0.00003595088,0.000023225826,0.04121388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700457,0.00055747025,0.000048071397,0.0002175364,0.0009070001,0.0012654865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805295,0.0005527436,0.00012128562,0.00014373795,0.0008201596,0.00030928364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025241035,0.00037186497,0.00032854322,0.0018327187,0.017583488,0.009956196,0.0016741842,0.0020829737,0.006356155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043955552,0.00019483821,0.0003167034,0.0023501194,0.036556054,0.0025653495,0.004616173,0.0030390962,0.00027143786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008552069,0.0000040167765,0.00053132186,0.000028237831,0.0000028848606,0.000074619544,0.018465191,0.00019697183,0.00009888445,0.9721576,0.003811728,0.00461995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034422803,0.000027529812,0.009875511,0.00054942735,0.000073904914,0.00021017058,0.08356864,0.0011725068,0.0007213881,0.3787627,0.5249127,0.00009101302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9816487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98858064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11129015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11129015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1327523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8074703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328554993","doi":"","title":"The Civil Justice System and the Public Justice for Nunavummiut: Partnerships for solutions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.08945733938751818,"score_gpt":0.31038670986522016,"score_spread":0.22092937047770198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328554993","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074259505,0.026474759,0.004007762,0.78495,0.002133832,0.0002547194,0.00008644814,0.000082923514,0.10775001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9529174,0.0057441415,0.0037036068,0.01990807,0.0002672436,0.00023716874,0.00005711021,0.00002765451,0.017137501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876667,0.005846546,0.00014137311,0.00060406956,0.000792933,0.0049482496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846831,0.0019413481,0.00062753056,0.00037755683,0.0012221087,0.011148378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010369703,0.0006864131,0.00046273283,0.0015580633,0.045252074,0.023244658,0.0038290715,0.011121531,0.015462021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009967032,0.0005798162,0.00045663008,0.001804376,0.025570404,0.017127987,0.030945327,0.009613828,0.00057689677],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006800901,0.00030354803,0.01567014,0.00047118802,0.00004936614,0.0018425031,0.13510612,0.0006682351,0.00054912135,0.6965914,0.07306939,0.075611055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046363162,0.0001316173,0.00808514,0.0015101177,0.000034318185,0.0003873213,0.54744065,0.0010901181,0.00025641327,0.15949732,0.28144115,0.000079508005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3207013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5358386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95473945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045260534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14855507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6376692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329186767","doi":"10.7870/cjcmh-2002-0028","title":"La Médiation et L'Ajustement à la Rupture D'union: L'impact de la Loi Québécoise Concernant la Médiation Familiale","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Mediation; Political science; Family law; Sociology; Law; Art","score_opus":0.058918860439210755,"score_gpt":0.370431777104138,"score_spread":0.31151291666492725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329186767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92203754,0.0074357125,0.0006168688,0.017086815,0.00012703225,0.00005981159,0.00018540016,0.000020970707,0.052429777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97909445,0.0025058002,0.0001867039,0.0008002716,0.000025298343,0.00003740229,0.00004506809,0.00000923428,0.017295783],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688727,0.001375203,0.00006393331,0.00018787781,0.00057414727,0.0009116366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929595,0.0027576918,0.0012182543,0.0002950369,0.0008714417,0.0018981058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028144256,0.00030428878,0.00041756607,0.0009647309,0.010593084,0.0035176727,0.0014167345,0.0017489044,0.019851498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013477872,0.0002501691,0.0003466351,0.0010246158,0.0062993057,0.0012266944,0.0038745606,0.0025128745,0.0007330907],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071613863,0.0007200116,0.29268596,0.0006218323,0.0002075396,0.004763722,0.42385554,0.0010278444,0.002014749,0.058243424,0.015937876,0.19920544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009900234,0.0003981622,0.51352245,0.0011937397,0.00016295725,0.0012746307,0.34782535,0.00052114297,0.001181391,0.004683728,0.1290066,0.00013081689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7455638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8662421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2544362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017386356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02073284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5118692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332931160","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x13000902","title":"Joint Assembly of the Anglican Church of Canada and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Synod; Convention; Context (archaeology); General assembly; Religious studies; Political science; Theology; Law; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01756096524075337,"score_gpt":0.2477105737714764,"score_spread":0.23014960853072303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332931160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47848606,0.019866824,0.0020486882,0.0846258,0.0035648954,0.00044701973,0.002020877,0.00017211545,0.4087677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6458936,0.002780398,0.0015619798,0.0067499084,0.0001355337,0.0000618787,0.00039047498,0.00006338261,0.3423628],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769247,0.00017132095,0.000035835594,0.00013837841,0.00077326235,0.0011887847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99486464,0.00035177672,0.00012669028,0.000098970224,0.0022511336,0.0023069002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021584088,0.0002285751,0.00028938786,0.0011228422,0.025428299,0.0040502483,0.0010697652,0.0014487327,0.007846239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003461997,0.00037852043,0.00018335957,0.0013040415,0.0032493595,0.0005271942,0.0023544233,0.0028591023,0.00041080176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019857004,0.00008183941,0.027704233,0.0003514293,0.00006109949,0.0017548389,0.07521823,0.000604603,0.0041074753,0.2467893,0.5313887,0.111739576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000099379195,0.000011345781,0.04024842,0.00015494473,0.000012912141,0.00010020981,0.026289286,0.00014229162,0.00051680347,0.0010307276,0.93142974,0.000053318614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065977514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.065977514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21919444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4787026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335630380","doi":"10.18290/rnp.2015.25.3-10","title":"Glosa do wyroku Sądu Sprawiedliwości Ontario w sprawie R. v. Wagner z dnia 12.06.2014 (R. v. Wagner, 2015 ONCJ 66)","year":2015,"lang":"pl","type":"article","venue":"Roczniki Nauk Prawnych","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Abortion; Political science; Personhood; Sociology","score_opus":0.05302006514128174,"score_gpt":0.3202284021936201,"score_spread":0.2672083370523384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335630380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02067634,0.007180751,0.0010135166,0.023505209,0.0010130764,0.0002896493,0.001999212,0.00017007334,0.9441522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08069411,0.0030778723,0.0007114068,0.010247923,0.0001043339,0.000086514156,0.00052936916,0.00006740975,0.904481],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980293,0.00006707656,0.0000428561,0.00015079523,0.0010371335,0.00067285006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999073,0.0001193981,0.000048482227,0.000031160107,0.00048240577,0.0002455089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007738641,0.0004493514,0.00027789926,0.0010510675,0.010589332,0.004718029,0.0008020729,0.0036562956,0.042297356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020661356,0.0005479677,0.0004330245,0.0009024901,0.0019544146,0.0011555044,0.0015928348,0.0030236146,0.00623001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000851777,0.000057792357,0.0063739694,0.00027031236,0.000025009262,0.0014905271,0.0034494095,0.00020851438,0.0025848066,0.20065296,0.7341441,0.050657455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009662557,0.000018448149,0.00783587,0.00010798845,0.000015151533,0.00016793379,0.00090304215,0.00010941779,0.0005455075,0.0015293491,0.9887235,0.00003408497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91102135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9812121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91102135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025739249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041071605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1867522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336348827","doi":"10.1177/0008429816636089","title":"An Inevitable “Marriage March”? A Survey of the “Arbiter of Religious Dogma” in Canadian Case Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mantra; Arbiter; Law; Doctrine; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Context (archaeology); Political science; Expression (computer science); Conversation; State (computer science); Sociology; Common law; Philosophy; History; Theology; Politics","score_opus":0.07874792178434409,"score_gpt":0.3953479752261911,"score_spread":0.316600053441847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336348827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78972507,0.016384995,0.00075686735,0.065808356,0.00019771773,0.000118686134,0.00048118638,0.00002818011,0.126499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990615,0.00533561,0.0002393828,0.0016320542,0.000025550507,0.00001951842,0.00008823525,0.000011883019,0.0020328208],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878539,0.0024940767,0.0004948496,0.00077585934,0.0051574637,0.003223847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97868574,0.008522914,0.0024432256,0.00043997023,0.0075003407,0.0024077788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0110340435,0.0003735534,0.00049202406,0.008478602,0.03818618,0.012770718,0.0023918152,0.0023237627,0.0035638213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030455293,0.00055028347,0.0002814077,0.017954536,0.023351679,0.0054546036,0.004653559,0.0035550606,0.00017632231],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002698921,0.000037113634,0.026224623,0.0002552721,0.000011291343,0.0005437468,0.8307859,0.000083300714,0.0004133774,0.10357563,0.010717057,0.027325772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004735737,0.00001070197,0.055160362,0.0005306815,0.0000190669,0.00019790443,0.83293366,0.00018697552,0.00016364365,0.0041636527,0.106573425,0.000055173798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99068743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17142718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17142718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16790083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.961027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336920591","doi":"","title":"White Man's Law: Native People in Nineteenth-Century Canadian Jurisprudence by Sidney Harring (review)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Historical Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; White (mutation); Law; History; Political science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.017781750338795355,"score_gpt":0.2778873941526946,"score_spread":0.2601056438138992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336920591","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010114636,0.91213834,0.00007204811,0.07499171,0.0034094597,0.000011038825,0.000071108014,0.000006552636,0.0082882475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024843607,0.9280394,0.00029065975,0.030611843,0.0025457682,0.000025311896,0.00008332197,0.000020785068,0.013539421],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974287,0.000490652,0.000127516,0.00025766285,0.0012762556,0.00041923125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941679,0.0016806849,0.00022010598,0.000103645005,0.0030925174,0.00073520443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054976107,0.00081053056,0.0010747152,0.005614406,0.011776822,0.006670751,0.0019021562,0.003836793,0.004262418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007881791,0.0004913817,0.00034401473,0.013577915,0.013150039,0.0042071375,0.0023791613,0.0044232956,0.0005262453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035748137,0.000034045526,0.0012694882,0.0023205457,0.0000491023,0.00025800345,0.01487483,0.00018552513,0.00013874707,0.060731407,0.7594402,0.16066231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010211523,0.0000092275595,0.006821733,0.00394703,0.00004606868,0.00018348578,0.0068423515,0.00002916787,0.00006641119,0.0048959786,0.9770989,0.000049496415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97443265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98917097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04766859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04766859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17165264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34586143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337258496","doi":"","title":"Child and Family Service Act 1999(1)Canada. Ontario State","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"神戸学院法学","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Service (business); Business; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.015082151859103329,"score_gpt":0.2460146308977318,"score_spread":0.23093247903862846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337258496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021055507,0.009162208,0.00061471545,0.047057148,0.004072481,0.0018242865,0.0920526,0.000429917,0.8237312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03102933,0.003628905,0.0010667806,0.014384031,0.00024281329,0.0007960486,0.008501625,0.00012390836,0.9402266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934041,0.00033163175,0.00034808845,0.000388894,0.003317072,0.0022103048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893805,0.0010005852,0.00044749424,0.00040644204,0.0067844396,0.0019805676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029319238,0.0010054341,0.0009518524,0.003435238,0.013663731,0.0069157947,0.0035866022,0.009333016,0.052656654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0085649565,0.0024486934,0.0012842915,0.0070357374,0.0024099273,0.0014967602,0.002459654,0.005952265,0.01175537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007362343,0.00007465322,0.0047835736,0.00019442732,0.000017902423,0.00020930104,0.0016795566,0.00023364612,0.00023990992,0.029454466,0.9520924,0.010946561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058175683,0.000016525339,0.044065062,0.00034261745,0.000021017497,0.00004235048,0.0011247781,0.00011437607,0.000121651836,0.0006767626,0.9533614,0.00005526531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9978709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99934393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15382855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15382855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35991296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98143893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338784354","doi":"","title":"‘A Delicate Necessity’: Bruker v. Marcovitz and the Problem of Jewish Divorce","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Judaism; Supreme court; Law; Wife; Political science; Multiculturalism; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.01597244043738162,"score_gpt":0.26823470459476073,"score_spread":0.2522622641573791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338784354","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2966764,0.014176574,0.0013115811,0.44684502,0.0005968214,0.00006046365,0.00009763072,0.000021619097,0.24021398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492265,0.0018819766,0.0003080125,0.04078092,0.00016054724,0.00001775384,0.000016315038,0.000010218631,0.0075977766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99485886,0.0013218574,0.00010215346,0.00031448592,0.0009972311,0.0024054614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964766,0.0019239265,0.0002751588,0.00010052711,0.0006080795,0.0006157489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044876602,0.00023973668,0.00043230108,0.0011371272,0.03272192,0.008485055,0.0028320085,0.011802904,0.0020474808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010461126,0.00040778218,0.0004485789,0.0020245567,0.022707485,0.0032432615,0.0038263572,0.009460228,0.00012508749],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030346957,0.000022448046,0.005116088,0.000026593269,0.000013279672,0.001974448,0.03411569,0.00023785017,0.0001682692,0.9215021,0.030822488,0.0059704417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015580047,0.000072507726,0.035935786,0.0008462865,0.000118419186,0.0027873213,0.25630346,0.0021655222,0.0015423401,0.25719145,0.44250828,0.00037282705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93034726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9612289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93034726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05026517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04949933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36470103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339422365","doi":"10.7202/1035839ar","title":"Natural Law, our Constitutions, and the Unborn","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Law; Natural law; Natural order; Constitutional law; Political science; Freedom of contract; Common law; Sociology; Public law; Philosophy of law","score_opus":0.01625116921654189,"score_gpt":0.2740743816699153,"score_spread":0.2578232124533734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339422365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032187916,0.06416427,0.0033753647,0.07744462,0.00084609265,0.00004303838,0.00016625301,0.000065885375,0.8217065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86177415,0.021793103,0.0027197106,0.009349122,0.00041086948,0.000056694116,0.00012520287,0.000050463954,0.10372065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674976,0.00083242357,0.00006804415,0.0003255937,0.00085186696,0.0011723726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984736,0.0006106404,0.00014833122,0.00016613227,0.00036238972,0.00023891698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026648866,0.00040288887,0.00048616892,0.0021399416,0.012818649,0.011708852,0.0015002334,0.002976197,0.0039864616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034163294,0.00029024275,0.0003315766,0.0018776263,0.06660819,0.0033723577,0.0026233478,0.0050530867,0.00034589003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010726038,0.0000016570234,0.00006155418,0.0000046041027,8.8961593e-7,0.000026030815,0.0016209248,0.0000491138,0.000012576605,0.9947136,0.0016876496,0.0018202055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000875677,0.000006771355,0.0016590243,0.00023920703,0.00001226361,0.000077921875,0.006938128,0.00020158327,0.00013503054,0.53609973,0.45459285,0.000028689763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8424192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.867438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8424192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053655934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05080958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3893029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339826288","doi":"","title":"Health and Equality: Is There a Cure?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Scrutiny; Health care; Disadvantaged; Supreme court; Political science; Right to health; Poverty; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.02994081118534909,"score_gpt":0.3591660680267725,"score_spread":0.3292252568414234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339826288","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059848563,0.022784483,0.0011520319,0.881986,0.0021200913,0.0000111615755,0.000044961118,0.000020863665,0.08589555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58185184,0.030097995,0.00240643,0.35029307,0.0043904083,0.000038815982,0.00009573162,0.000043553835,0.030782165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918304,0.0018599132,0.00016180109,0.0005875332,0.0026809252,0.002879557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99421245,0.0023695827,0.00041955052,0.0003432673,0.0008935724,0.0017616012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058043753,0.0004496711,0.0010361222,0.0013240448,0.015179394,0.011859265,0.0016421308,0.009877373,0.007077558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0109480675,0.00024281787,0.0004995674,0.0016282302,0.078028,0.010735092,0.0076053296,0.012769835,0.0005812099],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013453707,0.000017617112,0.0008061258,0.00008530115,0.000011585096,0.00012914812,0.0058034137,0.00006221732,0.000044578926,0.92035127,0.0487513,0.023923919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029348314,0.0000328098,0.0033518234,0.0009414188,0.000030370653,0.0002930467,0.030087443,0.00018050536,0.00016125294,0.55194396,0.41289183,0.000056134777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5371189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59569746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5371189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0336437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058243267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93121415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339967095","doi":"10.7202/1035709ar","title":"La trilogie Van Der Peet, Gladstone, Smokehouse et le droit autochtone","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.038837493867990514,"score_gpt":0.30090288030919754,"score_spread":0.262065386441207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339967095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10243908,0.04929768,0.0027830694,0.116992064,0.0038591677,0.00003382958,0.00028569758,0.000057008285,0.72425234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59929895,0.015143994,0.000734235,0.010364148,0.00095828023,0.00004605886,0.0001457856,0.00011739398,0.37319115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887866,0.000393253,0.000031632942,0.00020102953,0.00024776056,0.00024760087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881786,0.000582074,0.00013126055,0.0000970498,0.00015494988,0.00021684963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011889401,0.00030069172,0.00023605321,0.00091788307,0.005352143,0.00669183,0.00069641013,0.0021739232,0.02042367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020249276,0.00023584734,0.00017728694,0.0015825854,0.010169663,0.0048210844,0.0029659532,0.0051094517,0.001659989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030162022,0.000016869286,0.001244291,0.00008360532,0.0000042326046,0.0003032131,0.05807983,0.000043429623,0.00017908325,0.889053,0.032147046,0.018815227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005940424,0.000012098787,0.0027845318,0.0002928088,0.0000036137724,0.00021650225,0.02118042,0.0000529067,0.00018366758,0.027337143,0.94791627,0.000014031722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051972065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12677115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9480279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005280107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071136346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103339076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340726912","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2631570","title":"Conscientious Objections by Civil Servants: The Case of Marriage Commissioners and Same Sex Civil Marriages","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Civil servants; Law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Commercial law; Politics","score_opus":0.01921858205091505,"score_gpt":0.2998217048567435,"score_spread":0.28060312280582844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340726912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9451005,0.000537916,0.00023380127,0.026565015,0.00012973807,0.0000380073,0.000013885298,0.000005178137,0.027375959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941103,0.00037894605,0.00007361254,0.0027742058,0.00008166688,0.000017198769,0.000007545511,0.0000049456366,0.0025516145],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98890835,0.004146482,0.00028213905,0.00055078964,0.0007947552,0.0053175204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96666425,0.018995227,0.0050461595,0.0013416329,0.0012049936,0.006747679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0109159,0.0005078882,0.0012180476,0.0020936262,0.04112483,0.008820413,0.0034356476,0.023913871,0.009573794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038440168,0.0012173726,0.0008884667,0.0022618833,0.02656223,0.006590153,0.008493974,0.018093731,0.00049949886],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043074222,0.0013540405,0.104730114,0.00008623212,0.00010387066,0.08778817,0.59268117,0.0004991701,0.00044621312,0.18952253,0.008934191,0.013423606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019908538,0.00014684313,0.029597126,0.0002970287,0.000078074336,0.01739586,0.8990701,0.0012726957,0.00029226227,0.034513883,0.01701838,0.0001186873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10547939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1366382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10547939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060339887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011289362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20973086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341329121","doi":"10.7202/1035669ar","title":"The Human Foetus as a Legal Person","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Civil liberties; Common law; Humanity","score_opus":0.027324038904947157,"score_gpt":0.2939726318116141,"score_spread":0.2666485929066669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341329121","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004358552,0.13252816,0.0022280007,0.15262063,0.0077473186,0.000039424238,0.00010458171,0.000054436536,0.70031893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31808802,0.09956666,0.0022718355,0.12509151,0.010686206,0.00017612189,0.0001475895,0.00013471475,0.4438373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99577063,0.0017575688,0.00010805482,0.0005671784,0.00117931,0.0006172472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990777,0.0005228328,0.00006886673,0.00008094172,0.0001436882,0.00010600311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025301015,0.00053966814,0.00043704582,0.001003131,0.004886579,0.009833573,0.0013692068,0.008915883,0.0051795165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003175643,0.0002869137,0.00040298144,0.00070634094,0.019871904,0.004038592,0.0038297304,0.0070719337,0.0017763873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036309498,0.0000075055077,0.000101610116,0.000031524633,0.0000021489884,0.00008523501,0.0025841556,0.000028801998,0.00004291403,0.9595268,0.032137,0.0054486566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005831212,0.000009269096,0.0002626444,0.0002399922,0.0000050752205,0.00014778483,0.0010599677,0.000026783215,0.00007550703,0.07100979,0.92714894,0.000008451931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045168813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06114568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045168813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008349151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008156005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0898118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342604572","doi":"10.32920/22057217.v1","title":"Assessing Analogous Grounds: The Doctrinal and Normative Superiority of a Multi-Variable Approach","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Immutability; Charter; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; CLARITY; Constructive; Variable (mathematics); Political science; Normative; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09168106795931515,"score_gpt":0.3661318641658194,"score_spread":0.27445079620650426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342604572","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088567145,0.035521593,0.44934106,0.09669319,0.0014397524,0.0007250488,0.00023582041,0.00014915128,0.32732737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88306093,0.0029998706,0.104507454,0.0058498154,0.00043865162,0.00024979012,0.000062060375,0.000049218586,0.0027821914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93990207,0.03330684,0.002420702,0.0038557826,0.01812499,0.0023895707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.903327,0.073019534,0.0069507784,0.004446307,0.010667637,0.0015888563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049203634,0.00088213466,0.0016192101,0.013113678,0.0069637066,0.016173149,0.0065005417,0.0059919315,0.0031562499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08750423,0.0005744209,0.0018825048,0.0045395587,0.043488752,0.018336082,0.010588923,0.009392382,0.00022001819],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072497573,0.000010606023,0.0012018125,0.000081007,0.000016266968,0.00008965341,0.0016582451,0.00030095485,0.000046737947,0.9858417,0.00042871322,0.010317122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015863896,0.000019860154,0.0022634787,0.00047326557,0.00005030744,0.00015752405,0.0038987633,0.0019119453,0.00016803181,0.9757331,0.015274687,0.000033115048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066143475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12469882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066143475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019527541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028436568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26021677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W234302354","doi":"","title":"Constitutional and Common Law Dialogues between the Supreme Court and Canadian Legislatures","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Legislature; Statutory interpretation; Common law; Constitution; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Sociology","score_opus":0.024447995457764323,"score_gpt":0.2827624268547247,"score_spread":0.25831443139696036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W234302354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034383904,0.011026019,0.0052059763,0.057931118,0.00042197152,0.00007176413,0.00027630187,0.000058520418,0.8906245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90240276,0.0046301438,0.0029546455,0.0047584535,0.00016690852,0.000057665373,0.00014048285,0.0000348475,0.08485401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903065,0.003730257,0.00019455938,0.0008441922,0.0029353157,0.0019892636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950118,0.0031324977,0.00032194378,0.00028470188,0.0008333458,0.0004156892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057830997,0.00031927085,0.00034170054,0.0020507746,0.017209051,0.012674839,0.0013370706,0.004393613,0.009063587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015773365,0.00043833378,0.0002963671,0.0038088467,0.02310803,0.004878771,0.0028221083,0.004373877,0.0005054093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004239308,0.00000357966,0.00016947024,0.000013881081,0.000002081357,0.00008178065,0.0048157517,0.00021750947,0.000046013374,0.98347974,0.006047009,0.005118908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024318517,0.000018714596,0.00621523,0.00042697895,0.000029440058,0.00011631716,0.0145744085,0.0015870503,0.00038685187,0.3966415,0.57989645,0.000082647595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8794625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9129624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12053752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08417006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07967534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6106994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343359636","doi":"","title":"Recognizing Indigenous Legal Values in Modern Copyright Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Indigenous; Law; Political science; Legal history; Common law; Jurisprudence; Precedent; Comparative law; Sociology","score_opus":0.11134969897892558,"score_gpt":0.3431590601443749,"score_spread":0.23180936116544934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343359636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10713766,0.0056620277,0.0068104924,0.02693392,0.00029424205,0.00004725528,0.00004202951,0.00007023338,0.85300213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611272,0.0023934466,0.0024528534,0.0026330599,0.0001932812,0.000021010319,0.00001245535,0.000020035533,0.031146606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961118,0.00060128415,0.00013253746,0.00033079414,0.0018079444,0.0010156783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953093,0.002001899,0.0003177956,0.00041547496,0.0014929814,0.00046257686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035932492,0.00023370847,0.00024317605,0.0023708956,0.019053582,0.012331401,0.0014054767,0.003297941,0.0025667094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061788666,0.0002722857,0.00023678964,0.0020494724,0.04786905,0.006498045,0.0045211012,0.00428136,0.00018433195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002125909,0.0000055887526,0.00047984815,0.000021170104,0.0000020376483,0.00016760263,0.029897472,0.0000909879,0.00013000991,0.96204,0.0012827467,0.005880417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010402416,0.000025860854,0.005798321,0.00047252316,0.000037962924,0.0005188563,0.054326665,0.0011575958,0.0007681443,0.4493327,0.48747975,0.00007121308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69594985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.825061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30405015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038023405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041386668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61168146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344576478","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Coalescence: Substantive Equality as a Principle of Fundamental Justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Jurisprudence; Substantive rights; Subordination (linguistics); Constitutional right; Sociology; Law and economics; Human rights; Supreme court","score_opus":0.0343273714856297,"score_gpt":0.3579474696438073,"score_spread":0.3236200981581776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344576478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015128781,0.0054360447,0.24020296,0.09682754,0.0018525133,0.0002654105,0.000110019406,0.00018467197,0.6399921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8578188,0.0019334126,0.053467344,0.037222803,0.0024394495,0.00097392924,0.00012509502,0.0002211102,0.045798115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97001517,0.013917137,0.0013091619,0.0041200006,0.00785583,0.0027825236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872936,0.0076849656,0.00060541666,0.0020629612,0.0017302283,0.00062279246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03000915,0.0005785509,0.0008939085,0.001458977,0.011564546,0.013440118,0.003106906,0.009677708,0.004885123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029699063,0.0006319273,0.0012409692,0.0011260712,0.076129176,0.0152530195,0.010877119,0.016670285,0.0007864438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.638454e-7,0.0000017864742,0.000013772185,0.000004181152,7.759398e-7,0.000008588678,0.00045594602,0.000034327204,0.000019318482,0.99844307,0.00035914817,0.00065815455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010542029,0.00001243131,0.000057598845,0.00003973299,0.000004303753,0.00002668758,0.00028926152,0.00020324954,0.00012503608,0.9628522,0.036369942,0.000008952067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010582239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007972095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03000915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011121242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016580647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15870547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344958744","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fww005","title":"CONVERTING THE ‘RIGHT TO LIFE’ TO THE ‘RIGHT TO PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE AND EUTHANASIA’: AN ANALYSIS OF<i>CARTER V CANADA</i>(<i>ATTORNEY GENERAL</i>)<i>,</i>SUPREME COURT OF CANADA: Table 1.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Charter; Majority opinion; Constitutional right; Legislation; Economic Justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.032031938815030116,"score_gpt":0.30743284443337116,"score_spread":0.275400905618341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344958744","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055148073,0.01130244,0.0044463603,0.0412107,0.00033037865,0.00040832435,0.0011492757,0.00003494424,0.8859696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.830526,0.010923249,0.0041845543,0.050460815,0.00043142025,0.00035286744,0.0010042139,0.000102364924,0.10201463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901264,0.0011940952,0.00015320712,0.000494972,0.003971182,0.0040601417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981604,0.00063493266,0.00012458989,0.000069387715,0.0007055012,0.00030517788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020827278,0.00058163714,0.00071798975,0.0037974925,0.011408403,0.011659635,0.0037585762,0.006749617,0.00831802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042017633,0.00061958673,0.0016856366,0.004428897,0.021637237,0.0028048535,0.0034633165,0.010048933,0.00059669436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000096198555,0.000017100401,0.0006362212,0.000047689387,0.000011173209,0.000330282,0.0027308555,0.00048781472,0.00016367929,0.9793473,0.012142751,0.0040755877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087057466,0.00007498084,0.027035173,0.0010301841,0.00015007476,0.0005910497,0.017431434,0.0024308264,0.0011505276,0.3177489,0.6320316,0.00023806917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.950344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9718589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0874836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0874836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08271263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63474095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346090139","doi":"10.3138/ctr.166.001c","title":"<i>C-24 Squib</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Theatre Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Citizenship; Class (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Political science; Aesthetics; Gender studies; Art; Visual arts; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.035255031080970924,"score_gpt":0.30235308847041087,"score_spread":0.2670980573894399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346090139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013971921,0.027790004,0.0004761,0.43126684,0.038831647,0.00012314072,0.0016906993,0.00024789284,0.49817646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032164108,0.007891007,0.00055415026,0.39410624,0.005497493,0.00016094804,0.0008280918,0.00031249516,0.55848545],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973225,0.0003032912,0.00010059883,0.0002146319,0.0013131984,0.0007458633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99596196,0.001037154,0.00012490396,0.0001216099,0.0021918935,0.0005625169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021841386,0.00069716485,0.00038969412,0.0014600307,0.013328295,0.0068760235,0.0018722686,0.006352319,0.046280093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0091717765,0.00036126634,0.00049469236,0.0018896206,0.003983878,0.002815929,0.0018670957,0.008282276,0.0102351885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044078565,0.0000017656171,0.000049260616,0.00003244447,0.0000010325127,0.000020673273,0.00031051502,0.0000067723827,0.00004319834,0.00602217,0.99174964,0.0017581577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020445839,0.000003122945,0.00063653995,0.000114102084,0.0000023538043,0.000027320511,0.0012947915,0.000008995424,0.00008277704,0.00036265582,0.997454,0.000011373818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8135418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9373875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8135418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024650056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032017037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37511247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2356352757","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14637276.v1","title":"The impact of volunteer community service programs on students in Toronto's secondary schools","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Public sector; Voluntary sector; Service (business); Immigration; Public relations; Business; Turnover; Private sector; Economic growth; Political science; Public administration; Marketing; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.05314170820523266,"score_gpt":0.40763984859917246,"score_spread":0.3544981403939398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2356352757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794334,0.00057851436,0.000029729608,0.0045184456,0.00008374101,0.00014316422,0.0008415769,0.00002370129,0.014347804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99282914,0.00036408522,0.00005864438,0.00026847702,0.000022053346,0.000054733406,0.00031479183,0.000005786071,0.006082296],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789315,0.00039058024,0.000044089586,0.00008944576,0.00033646656,0.0012463442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898741,0.00038120136,0.0004255436,0.000117571966,0.0012906461,0.007911032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011226063,0.00029523904,0.00041832085,0.00081030733,0.0050001014,0.0025940065,0.0010182259,0.00083005615,0.009964501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030692588,0.00018869,0.0004768846,0.0016817125,0.0015208487,0.00059688435,0.0033814188,0.0009962915,0.00054695405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024265056,0.0033079274,0.61204207,0.0010819494,0.00012574572,0.0011372976,0.10565531,0.0009163979,0.0014541445,0.007291592,0.104401626,0.16015945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016577984,0.00093041477,0.8612678,0.00029859503,0.000057712696,0.00006117456,0.11231715,0.0003682275,0.0005051055,0.00037595205,0.023615764,0.000036276753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90845305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97157156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90845305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031754054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055340607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23039287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W235819439","doi":"","title":"The Covenanters in Canada: Reformed Presbyterianism from 1820 to 2012 by Eldon Hay (review)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hay; History; Ancient history; Political science; Animal science; Biology","score_opus":0.007249275033467997,"score_gpt":0.21530103784321944,"score_spread":0.20805176280975143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W235819439","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005108954,0.93821466,0.00010922512,0.03854495,0.0016299776,0.000015823132,0.00035261005,0.00001146279,0.016012445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10259058,0.8631706,0.00039439756,0.019859795,0.0010512291,0.000027960043,0.0004068036,0.00003648218,0.012462153],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567235,0.00046877487,0.00022590756,0.00039435067,0.0019082134,0.0013304425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927471,0.0009845437,0.00059653504,0.00016772852,0.0044639925,0.0010400253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038100407,0.00079072337,0.0012534019,0.0046906834,0.008821289,0.008177558,0.0023703598,0.0034426537,0.004786873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010804475,0.00069353735,0.00059271674,0.014873505,0.010637008,0.0035414197,0.002872326,0.0050556045,0.00047551063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014111714,0.000039421462,0.004794495,0.006034032,0.00020322438,0.00034521348,0.012983061,0.00088005094,0.00014993246,0.102697276,0.47350085,0.39823136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022624767,0.000017818676,0.02544804,0.010836302,0.0001894132,0.00014813982,0.007816895,0.00008499397,0.00012889072,0.0038041319,0.9514055,0.00009731261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99286383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11035622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11035622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37438634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80069417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2375106198","doi":"10.3138/jrpc.27.3.3219","title":"From<i>Holy Grail</i>to<i>The Lost Gospel</i>: Margaret Starbird and Mary Magdalene Scholarship","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religion and Popular Culture","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gospel; Legend; Scholarship; Holy Grail; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Romance; Literature; Theology; Classics; History; Philosophy; Art; Law","score_opus":0.031268871926420874,"score_gpt":0.3027743432955597,"score_spread":0.27150547136913883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2375106198","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19647062,0.08293758,0.0012143817,0.28873992,0.005837006,0.000019468536,0.000029659768,0.000055440498,0.42469585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92089564,0.0119896205,0.00025970428,0.01250275,0.001667178,0.000013158078,0.000010201791,0.000050828796,0.05261082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984464,0.00094866543,0.000026845099,0.0001292995,0.00022978995,0.00021893048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99785334,0.001128453,0.00020207018,0.000103307495,0.00024761722,0.000465162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022061593,0.0002562091,0.00030948457,0.0011351662,0.023596963,0.009952593,0.0009803352,0.0031998937,0.0045111584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004292094,0.00020628808,0.00010902098,0.0009283074,0.02672225,0.00464215,0.00674118,0.0063627143,0.00060243823],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039201503,0.000064560096,0.00076771784,0.00011861369,0.0000066736393,0.0006243579,0.32453883,0.00004753508,0.0003167108,0.58869547,0.064491384,0.020288873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007868704,0.000032152253,0.0011263733,0.0003636104,0.000006940149,0.00032394956,0.17975105,0.000045976194,0.0003823857,0.03985078,0.7780895,0.000019417741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01756587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051423084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023596963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076396647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048317458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055429876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W23785182","doi":"","title":"Sexual assault, domestic violence and HIV: promoting women's rights through legislation.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Human rights; Political science; Law; Domestic violence; Presentation (obstetrics); Sexual assault; Poison control; Criminology; Sociology; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Environmental health","score_opus":0.036305310073052176,"score_gpt":0.27759123139270575,"score_spread":0.24128592131965357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W23785182","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035874654,0.14890502,0.00063849747,0.4575798,0.0019501795,0.00006061865,0.0000844559,0.000027772408,0.35487905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7246681,0.13504371,0.0014019634,0.0716018,0.001212721,0.00015058849,0.00011490755,0.000020447995,0.06578576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733305,0.0011407748,0.000086885695,0.0001260314,0.0007373383,0.00057591347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968515,0.0017476176,0.00033682547,0.00008075451,0.00049790594,0.00048540533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003338257,0.00021507815,0.00020703214,0.0014507392,0.008936929,0.005118763,0.0009005179,0.0039775106,0.004257036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00855725,0.000218121,0.0001358362,0.0016526703,0.017184092,0.003288222,0.003389698,0.003266929,0.0002599749],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015157846,0.00007601993,0.0038711717,0.00046020624,0.0000069939233,0.0003833191,0.08192027,0.000095435775,0.00041056893,0.67211026,0.08786651,0.15278411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017670456,0.000048175312,0.030420657,0.0024076323,0.000020793404,0.00032385957,0.097560234,0.000078016514,0.00041107307,0.057996847,0.8106867,0.000028288763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43485203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6295677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43485203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012523838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03796198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86464185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2385140027","doi":"","title":"On Development Course of Canada's Constitution and the Reasons of Constitwtioal Success","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of North China Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Constitution; Constitutionalism; Law; State (computer science); Foundation (evidence); Political science; Public administration; Democracy","score_opus":0.013072475064588546,"score_gpt":0.2291906149794465,"score_spread":0.21611813991485795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2385140027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14976445,0.0026979619,0.0008032974,0.07524308,0.00022658336,0.00005673797,0.00049330806,0.00002532197,0.77068925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9627088,0.00072602317,0.00021081902,0.0027237467,0.00003802816,0.000014554423,0.000072217365,0.000020484369,0.033485446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959007,0.00030726197,0.000061306346,0.00027547617,0.0011058203,0.0023494994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953101,0.0008655782,0.00026529602,0.00014123466,0.002072819,0.0013449787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002233016,0.00018132245,0.00022976333,0.001942377,0.019969827,0.010020735,0.0010423611,0.0021584025,0.008827365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006840884,0.00017482867,0.0001946904,0.0027179592,0.01563696,0.0020285337,0.0021988635,0.003974157,0.00035213435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000117480895,0.0000091816055,0.004340618,0.000010488643,0.0000032921557,0.00019174226,0.0064014955,0.00009405372,0.00007319213,0.9655303,0.01648076,0.0068531726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045798748,0.000028056027,0.076756015,0.00048354873,0.00004402045,0.0002876607,0.0500203,0.0010044525,0.0006110187,0.15336579,0.71722275,0.00013063493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9578198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9811349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07811735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07811735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11373098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56678367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W239116906","doi":"","title":"R. v. Ryan Duress is Not Necessary Where Necessity is Sufficient","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Surprise; Law; Relevance (law); Commit; Psychology; Political science; Criminology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.040929138952410835,"score_gpt":0.29336164553016675,"score_spread":0.2524325065777559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W239116906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08464657,0.008720287,0.0063511394,0.09332183,0.0028326912,0.0001681022,0.00032653072,0.00031210133,0.80332077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8679714,0.0032046742,0.0027746446,0.050304227,0.0016874118,0.0001850738,0.00016321665,0.00011226182,0.0735972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946398,0.0010740233,0.0005274409,0.0011525908,0.0013173448,0.0012889085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946455,0.0026561376,0.00062386383,0.00071040925,0.00073520764,0.00062884565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004064289,0.00040783294,0.0012611948,0.00073937,0.0037050555,0.0043866932,0.0011495304,0.008722266,0.010475401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01868323,0.0006274855,0.00089113944,0.0002349653,0.007896731,0.0045572557,0.0031754905,0.012222763,0.0024776657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019789561,0.00003411452,0.0021375436,0.00025650513,0.000041696698,0.0028660947,0.002815177,0.0003750109,0.0022977572,0.9307063,0.047138542,0.011133227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002454682,0.0004970136,0.0104668895,0.0015625156,0.0002295733,0.010012331,0.0047706757,0.0012301023,0.0035289053,0.4266323,0.5404751,0.00034922353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012607112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017322572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012607112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017810337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039577372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035043716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2392342701","doi":"","title":"Canada Apologizes to Chinese Community for Discriminatory Laws","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"中国妇女(英文版)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Citizenship; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.03447134572658721,"score_gpt":0.32896070499012336,"score_spread":0.29448935926353614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2392342701","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011714812,0.004092831,0.0004905653,0.7583002,0.020287327,0.00018861266,0.0010267468,0.00029728736,0.20360163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06319536,0.0019520002,0.0012136674,0.39137712,0.001413352,0.00009860607,0.00040208627,0.00015306483,0.5401947],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945234,0.00023406417,0.00014899507,0.0004068457,0.0027771103,0.001909592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986878,0.0011716754,0.00033950302,0.0004976905,0.0070878863,0.0040252786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026969379,0.00063195406,0.00073359173,0.0012557738,0.027618498,0.0060599428,0.002700245,0.011217809,0.036261316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011200384,0.00047624685,0.00067651464,0.0017847304,0.005514609,0.001568026,0.0034177778,0.012900383,0.0045200177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015044836,0.000017035616,0.0011624097,0.0000339278,0.00000888466,0.00022332827,0.0006989267,0.000039989456,0.00013399473,0.014265353,0.9747945,0.008606514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014972726,0.000008981874,0.001950981,0.000047821195,0.000011155961,0.000070631744,0.0012780784,0.00010698591,0.00013140654,0.001038683,0.9953088,0.000031422558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97718436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98789257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05254004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05254004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26820144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38120645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2395633455","doi":"","title":"Culture, Religion and the Ordinary Person: An Essay on R. v. Humaid","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Doctrine; Law; Politics; Relevance (law); Identity (music); Political science; Test (biology); Sociology","score_opus":0.015711832808209494,"score_gpt":0.2978013009644423,"score_spread":0.2820894681562328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2395633455","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024233911,0.117975585,0.0012947392,0.5449492,0.0064128325,0.00006833205,0.00008394355,0.000019539093,0.3049619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5701151,0.06308767,0.0017112349,0.22914128,0.005485844,0.00013948735,0.000060613227,0.00006016425,0.13019857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953275,0.0021499693,0.00013108234,0.00030766547,0.0014960368,0.0005877331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972288,0.0019812777,0.000107120344,0.00006758367,0.0004107208,0.00020447679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039048754,0.00039808912,0.00047164867,0.0010098395,0.015814524,0.0064944937,0.0013051877,0.008308829,0.001409094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056345835,0.0003029867,0.0003131638,0.0010031181,0.027908452,0.0035275044,0.0024550639,0.006958097,0.00028999906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021268148,0.000039988372,0.00082575344,0.00018826629,0.000013560034,0.0007741587,0.07210821,0.0001511617,0.00028359937,0.68300873,0.21734151,0.025243808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016037618,0.000024264722,0.0027805374,0.0010654172,0.000012961231,0.00021055204,0.030799428,0.00010548089,0.00018026397,0.10025627,0.86450386,0.000044816894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28357852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40155426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28357852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021068549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015189334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56385577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2395940210","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_104546","title":"What Is Good for a Person","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05253140270650852,"score_gpt":0.3381349404542387,"score_spread":0.2856035377477302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2395940210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079005376,0.0077723907,0.0026407281,0.35140643,0.0042482824,0.000069899594,0.00015035964,0.00008984715,0.55461663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92711633,0.0034195678,0.0019933088,0.03764434,0.0009481757,0.00005862514,0.000063961095,0.00009914135,0.028656658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849674,0.009114968,0.0003800135,0.0007516554,0.002580943,0.0022050333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97981364,0.004906256,0.0022383975,0.0020327875,0.0030279842,0.007980875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065238187,0.0004091817,0.00093004224,0.001784896,0.018069264,0.01245845,0.0013005034,0.0044003343,0.0078768935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015665708,0.00030066766,0.0006976278,0.0013957263,0.036816057,0.011486407,0.005182315,0.0066614808,0.0017645302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008135392,0.00031583742,0.0147306295,0.0005502281,0.00018394316,0.0012126561,0.24880494,0.00012487247,0.0005520687,0.56293786,0.12650156,0.044004146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027637638,0.00010467205,0.008044855,0.00097256806,0.000097880264,0.0016341687,0.35236272,0.000107792,0.00048035677,0.25654846,0.37951168,0.00010720191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057721986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009253904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018069264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00333487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061080377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03450167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2396333428","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal Rights, Collective Rights, and Adjudicative Virtues","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Adjudication; Economic Justice; Human rights; International human rights law","score_opus":0.016268224519584186,"score_gpt":0.3151240322686559,"score_spread":0.29885580774907167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2396333428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07180538,0.017281115,0.0035948015,0.040150885,0.00043594008,0.00003563868,0.000084406696,0.000027687438,0.8665841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92196447,0.004559045,0.0014793383,0.0038025444,0.000306907,0.00003675766,0.000046574598,0.000025467603,0.06777891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969849,0.0009205239,0.00005054805,0.00024269498,0.00093333353,0.00086810277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985567,0.00063662103,0.00010504738,0.00011750105,0.00035881673,0.00022541608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027813232,0.000241835,0.0003068062,0.0011281832,0.013766525,0.0067177536,0.00080718583,0.0016171234,0.0035698747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029449991,0.0001418028,0.00022586361,0.0014708863,0.037753165,0.0018857958,0.0029348666,0.002906051,0.00025951455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026333846,0.0000038773605,0.0002780414,0.000013523203,0.000001768443,0.00007322967,0.01073294,0.00006116001,0.000055523073,0.9806769,0.004709114,0.0033912894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011614583,0.000016406797,0.008241768,0.00034143912,0.000013882553,0.00017267835,0.021732792,0.00031691245,0.00025013022,0.50664574,0.46222767,0.000029091603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66838723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75949633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66838723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026168736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023893464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6671314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399953505","doi":"","title":"Alberta law confining child prostitutes upheld.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Charter; Political science; Queen (butterfly); High Court","score_opus":0.03526355413524654,"score_gpt":0.26950430145770615,"score_spread":0.2342407473224596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399953505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016034868,0.013483571,0.0005959454,0.043963473,0.0028899338,0.00015470294,0.0014708935,0.000117572425,0.9212891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15717494,0.0035750656,0.0017032074,0.05216526,0.0005160513,0.00015039463,0.0005904774,0.000047407833,0.7840772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684685,0.0002423917,0.00007203583,0.00024101349,0.0016645045,0.00093326304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979054,0.00072967337,0.00008536699,0.00012432758,0.00084599614,0.0003092258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015198266,0.0004322947,0.0002818083,0.00096037163,0.013336168,0.0039626374,0.0018771886,0.008170221,0.011005804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004649415,0.00075032795,0.0004519047,0.0013219033,0.004035802,0.00085564994,0.0015908957,0.007139145,0.0014309856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004223185,0.000039410315,0.003010393,0.00006518324,0.000009618572,0.001224497,0.008271132,0.00016533193,0.0006012104,0.51491815,0.448902,0.022750786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022762819,0.000017519933,0.014173637,0.00026835472,0.000024821818,0.00034580383,0.002026349,0.00013593979,0.00041253556,0.01013435,0.97239316,0.00004475309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9535157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98557854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04648429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022386346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04775679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16242504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404168557","doi":"10.82308/19192","title":"The covenant chain of peace : metaphor and religious thought in seventeenth century Haudenosaunee council oratory","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University at Buffalo; McGill University; State University of New York","keywords":"Covenant; Metaphor; Context (archaeology); Politics; Sociology; Political science; History; Law; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022256558091716356,"score_gpt":0.26569021078498783,"score_spread":0.24343365269327147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2404168557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72903323,0.018127173,0.00339257,0.015256984,0.00045483036,0.000040453277,0.000022148202,0.000022826216,0.23364991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99500173,0.0013294064,0.00033652186,0.0002676638,0.000029417406,0.000011376963,0.0000043560417,0.000004195785,0.0030152625],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986022,0.0009980513,0.000028449434,0.00006582334,0.0001168939,0.00018852885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993094,0.00044628646,0.00009619377,0.00002741611,0.00005062746,0.00007008484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021175032,0.00033842228,0.00027612736,0.0012856206,0.010220046,0.004257964,0.00069526955,0.0019170447,0.0012295464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018305315,0.00022316982,0.00017032167,0.0014870175,0.028520282,0.0046237186,0.0033567906,0.002265957,0.000110894005],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024810106,0.000019602277,0.00055309624,0.0000409712,0.000002393379,0.0004121909,0.5792891,0.00008566971,0.0002483507,0.4149245,0.0007458011,0.0036535875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002323455,0.000068313195,0.0035300958,0.0003205458,0.000007378078,0.0008629908,0.7745819,0.00043959272,0.00028303367,0.05074036,0.16911103,0.000031546926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013405488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022203315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013405488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006241386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020944234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04528463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404579432","doi":"","title":"Morgentaler v. The Queen in the Supreme Court of Canada.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Abortion; Political science; Constitutional right; Politics; Majority opinion; High Court; Supreme Court Decisions; State (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.024900903398976056,"score_gpt":0.24509484413166516,"score_spread":0.2201939407326891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2404579432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051597547,0.021610223,0.0013013595,0.15683709,0.0021756913,0.000223804,0.0023264778,0.00017763428,0.7637502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36706516,0.0049907058,0.0013791475,0.10597873,0.00025789454,0.00010116542,0.0004827266,0.00008094552,0.5196636],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821556,0.00013177021,0.000029625899,0.00014745437,0.0008416633,0.00063395326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878436,0.0002873399,0.00005165431,0.000029715635,0.00055018277,0.00029676652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000868544,0.00027449994,0.00023005025,0.0005167491,0.016720101,0.003058568,0.0009829983,0.004410917,0.0085321115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041530416,0.00036209042,0.00042504646,0.0006407773,0.0018774262,0.0008346265,0.0011023412,0.004200997,0.0008203287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008153991,0.00003742951,0.007695148,0.000117309784,0.000036015386,0.0017599263,0.008107085,0.00022822156,0.0014591945,0.30634248,0.6426466,0.031489067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004406362,0.000029214238,0.02482545,0.00029201884,0.00006488586,0.00029855015,0.0040244623,0.00042225502,0.0011408897,0.010052117,0.9587134,0.000092790084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9778496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99439394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027408363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027408363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056971416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1988625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404693224","doi":"10.51644/9780889207288","title":"Ritual and Ethnic Identity","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnic group; Identity (music); Sociology; Anthropology; Genealogy; Gender studies; History; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.0522980631230016,"score_gpt":0.3530813909246451,"score_spread":0.30078332780164346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2404693224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0728474,0.011182869,0.0014800384,0.003529678,0.00029620307,0.000029710372,0.00006285177,0.00003073878,0.9105406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8477407,0.0042782184,0.0011753078,0.00068184844,0.00013744854,0.000029634502,0.000087271095,0.000044337146,0.1458252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932945,0.00020886249,0.000020328953,0.000059259703,0.00021000035,0.00017204268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997553,0.000058035857,0.000029238783,0.000035064797,0.000061265404,0.00006115403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058796676,0.00034807858,0.00022045078,0.0010630606,0.008301211,0.004213741,0.0008040786,0.0005578763,0.0051201526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008366976,0.00010885518,0.00015147636,0.0010974036,0.019493435,0.0015492847,0.0027270906,0.0008016377,0.0005461895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016916252,0.00001881256,0.002354321,0.000075336546,0.000008450713,0.00020434095,0.14144215,0.0000814187,0.00029974253,0.7977437,0.010087857,0.047667038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065839195,0.00002369349,0.014308819,0.00026127783,0.000013178486,0.0005320225,0.1036182,0.00010107116,0.00033519825,0.051120434,0.82965505,0.000024530447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19992678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4008015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19992678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005474467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00455521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3975262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404780777","doi":"","title":"Confounding Concepts: The Judicial Definition of the Constitutional Protection of the Aboriginal Right to Self-Government in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Test (biology); Constitutional law; Power (physics); Corporate governance; Separation of powers; Economics; Constitution; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.011082575285527162,"score_gpt":0.2774948458354345,"score_spread":0.26641227054990735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2404780777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09819717,0.009124579,0.0128711,0.08228435,0.00073818397,0.0001353336,0.00034415608,0.000056304554,0.79624873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9587733,0.0019830172,0.0030584757,0.0076544713,0.00012512572,0.00006065677,0.000061111525,0.000023948283,0.028259788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922404,0.0015433866,0.00028534865,0.00093185634,0.0032073758,0.0017916305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956995,0.001694051,0.00024515807,0.00028936862,0.0017311821,0.0003407835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00466329,0.00031172417,0.00044581192,0.0013700345,0.018343134,0.0111922175,0.0028961692,0.0035667147,0.0023753603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012894434,0.0002803622,0.0003617697,0.002541313,0.022791175,0.0028953243,0.002937192,0.0062719258,0.00013823378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000310538,0.000002108152,0.00025277305,0.000007723562,0.0000016269591,0.00003764018,0.0022653341,0.00015170513,0.000044002307,0.994056,0.0014083114,0.0017696228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057278576,0.000033326796,0.0107743265,0.00052082184,0.00007162137,0.00025687937,0.016723532,0.0033195869,0.000979175,0.59100693,0.37606436,0.00019231303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9753587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9722803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09509438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09509438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15665738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68996125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2405232763","doi":"","title":"Appeals heard on both medical and non-medical marijuana.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; RAID; Criminology; Political science; History; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04136158710680948,"score_gpt":0.2860121161173894,"score_spread":0.24465052901057993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2405232763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054089617,0.0044601248,0.00044237636,0.17164297,0.007862155,0.00062948035,0.0018337197,0.00015845407,0.75888103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18962516,0.002021249,0.00024917795,0.11432985,0.0028703013,0.00020419223,0.0004905049,0.00006905018,0.6901405],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931758,0.00029908703,0.00024654064,0.00035083006,0.0032677313,0.0026601034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940294,0.0015128059,0.00015763212,0.0001183348,0.002918032,0.001263846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024919263,0.00061428867,0.0008610487,0.0021514047,0.025496129,0.004607413,0.0018353655,0.018627392,0.048777845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01523553,0.0006638701,0.00094038236,0.0015463185,0.0031974062,0.0013524797,0.0033819296,0.009466499,0.005485717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030480314,0.00017895541,0.008311585,0.00021299387,0.00006819831,0.016536461,0.012723953,0.000098212964,0.0036253857,0.073289394,0.8629656,0.021684555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000966304,0.0000758834,0.022596149,0.00017280695,0.000070810136,0.00087630947,0.008889777,0.00018463169,0.0005939551,0.0029439514,0.9634103,0.00008880735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7226834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8963586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7226834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022245504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02515086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5578995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2406190884","doi":"","title":"Saskatchewan Court of Appeal: marriage commissioners cannot discriminate.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thales (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Charter; Law; Political science; Legislation; High Court","score_opus":0.07221442806542154,"score_gpt":0.27942089039365814,"score_spread":0.20720646232823658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2406190884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02843123,0.0053536254,0.00068478804,0.25358006,0.0076630893,0.0010064149,0.012780487,0.00026643215,0.69023377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.105511025,0.0025433747,0.00081232237,0.24275742,0.0008265125,0.0009216554,0.0027277851,0.00008749577,0.6438124],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947753,0.00045600123,0.00029659693,0.0007282742,0.0016839681,0.0020599102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934089,0.0020265807,0.00017584082,0.00048278653,0.0030510456,0.0008547592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036537016,0.0011667068,0.0009822872,0.0015471634,0.019403175,0.008320723,0.0039024577,0.025489358,0.05098142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010729731,0.0019592189,0.0013166957,0.0025326984,0.0037758655,0.0023525625,0.0031556138,0.019798702,0.014872183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002450568,0.00015668715,0.0062777065,0.00013435243,0.00006964331,0.0022763433,0.0020250245,0.00024931337,0.0015637128,0.11549045,0.8586708,0.0128409285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004450462,0.000089710644,0.031042477,0.0007601738,0.00016542681,0.0005269033,0.005205376,0.0009953867,0.0014620585,0.01865238,0.9403453,0.00030972157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89211035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96834534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10788965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035940886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10355569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26077062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2416192451","doi":"","title":"\"Bad law\" argument in Morgentaler v. The Queen.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Law; Supreme court; Appeal; Statute; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Duty; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03335720739152955,"score_gpt":0.28158105417311385,"score_spread":0.2482238467815843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2416192451","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04057587,0.008667812,0.0017234031,0.434128,0.002977819,0.00014134699,0.00019619035,0.000061785395,0.5115278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4320165,0.001774518,0.0008558954,0.44030657,0.001143353,0.00015165741,0.000066348686,0.000054185075,0.123630956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99281245,0.0022051272,0.00019849627,0.0006878909,0.0023331759,0.0017629052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966491,0.0019475978,0.00021541334,0.00011787411,0.000666355,0.00040366282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049094036,0.0004119751,0.00051810517,0.00066042604,0.014199026,0.007313567,0.002670231,0.029860001,0.003913162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01287333,0.0007638806,0.0010401476,0.00044003606,0.009119555,0.0030141168,0.0030467166,0.020576838,0.0007811986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006494292,0.000035144138,0.0012477296,0.00008880633,0.00003404546,0.0033855555,0.015290903,0.00015674465,0.0005076207,0.7908618,0.18426763,0.004059059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001416294,0.00011634682,0.009116405,0.0006465874,0.00014848678,0.0013283633,0.0166496,0.0009207967,0.0022102967,0.15487513,0.81366855,0.0001777561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24484034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41793543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7551597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012098094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009321939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4868304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2417315670","doi":"10.1093/pch/21.5.245","title":"Toward the full and proper implementation of Jordan's Principle: An elusive goal to date","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paediatrics & Child Health","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Payment; Tribunal; Political science; Service (business); Law; Service provider; House of Commons; Public administration; Business; Politics; Economics; Economy; Finance","score_opus":0.0342140601147113,"score_gpt":0.3676809689479009,"score_spread":0.33346690883318963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2417315670","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032080885,0.0064591034,0.011015492,0.824793,0.002084203,0.00011129198,0.00004498464,0.00009691334,0.12331406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5326831,0.006251822,0.032192305,0.37669176,0.0021323538,0.0002742247,0.00006892411,0.00016848999,0.049537092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97716504,0.010401033,0.0014077905,0.0017262325,0.0063958326,0.0029041555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761835,0.008136001,0.0025644733,0.0016578372,0.00823901,0.003219286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046831153,0.00037848327,0.0007862396,0.0008346491,0.016134022,0.014104116,0.003411561,0.014159401,0.0029749195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0385782,0.0004795904,0.00082007155,0.00095117715,0.052575808,0.012293963,0.0123045575,0.02453299,0.0010133678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008296891,0.000046038993,0.0008908412,0.00006699018,0.000007172387,0.00019865291,0.016716525,0.00013026684,0.00014019164,0.9386664,0.030625181,0.012503578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030049623,0.00005103999,0.0014171775,0.0009995819,0.000017923216,0.0005945898,0.042322807,0.00057175144,0.001043441,0.37154332,0.5813097,0.00009855044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027081901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04100678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9729181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009372925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0825406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24766976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2423738415","doi":"","title":"Hearing the Sexual Assault Complaints of Women with Mental Disabilities: Consent, Capacity, and Mistaken Belief","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Psychology; Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Voluntariness; Feminist legal theory; Criminology; Legislation; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Feminism","score_opus":0.0551548563594436,"score_gpt":0.30601896407232326,"score_spread":0.25086410771287965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2423738415","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98131084,0.002638311,0.0000942183,0.006688448,0.000052497428,0.000021656533,0.000038180853,0.0000066607045,0.009149159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99652785,0.0015957152,0.000047227586,0.0007597736,0.000033587567,0.000013084631,0.000011669375,0.0000016629057,0.0010094473],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860424,0.0008035155,0.00008720627,0.00004671275,0.00020398699,0.00025429646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99427706,0.0035120822,0.0015969414,0.00009118343,0.00024134663,0.00028141384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013946587,0.00018939028,0.00026529908,0.0010981206,0.0020799045,0.0020016285,0.0003759228,0.0014120378,0.004014127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019482262,0.00025748447,0.00012721348,0.0007330893,0.0034972865,0.0018719941,0.002133917,0.0010779076,0.00035231299],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014811741,0.0002441291,0.42637688,0.00043302542,0.000033569566,0.012070627,0.40957668,0.00008297975,0.0011056124,0.006150143,0.0083834315,0.13539474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013782682,0.00017111251,0.23240781,0.0005090254,0.000025038935,0.011588033,0.7396575,0.00012506377,0.0004152595,0.0027544433,0.012297481,0.000035493278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00823426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011058291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00823426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009010457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010674752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01637268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2427097214","doi":"","title":"The Carriage of Death: What Kind Does Canada Have?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carriage; Metaphor; Law; Poetry; Court decision; History; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Art; Archaeology; Literature; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028623207812052475,"score_gpt":0.2529400813373401,"score_spread":0.22431687352528762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2427097214","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08178463,0.027013639,0.0021525072,0.45227593,0.0033520914,0.000037306017,0.0006800669,0.00006171651,0.43264207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90213037,0.017018484,0.0009149958,0.04062664,0.00028728042,0.000024987043,0.00023595191,0.00008545531,0.038675845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960705,0.0008336822,0.00008017064,0.00033947214,0.0010538519,0.0016224203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938904,0.0013967174,0.00042560586,0.00017201502,0.00207837,0.0020368628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025643287,0.00038153064,0.00056608254,0.001775685,0.037333384,0.016028251,0.0020490424,0.0031131802,0.008726436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009567855,0.00022627573,0.00038333182,0.0044988776,0.032575652,0.008555511,0.0052608103,0.0054529277,0.0006236765],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006718663,0.000022781884,0.009627291,0.00031029916,0.000027411019,0.00078490534,0.18694578,0.00016379166,0.00018452808,0.59558594,0.16099332,0.0452868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009877431,0.000014776354,0.0091165025,0.0008807437,0.00003342499,0.00022022384,0.3501258,0.00010556967,0.00013446294,0.024673583,0.61458397,0.00010113042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98605597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99349195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09126798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09126798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14226237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66219866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2438599073","doi":"","title":"Federal and Provincial Responsibilities to Implement Physician-Assisted Suicide.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Supreme court; Parliament; Political science; Constitutional right; Politics","score_opus":0.06557578761139735,"score_gpt":0.3243805241960918,"score_spread":0.2588047365846945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2438599073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076156184,0.0039357357,0.005373857,0.0947275,0.0021718298,0.0010569897,0.0035717008,0.0004834251,0.8125229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5791881,0.0018850173,0.008843354,0.01906755,0.00015717138,0.00030467974,0.0009475584,0.000059186994,0.38954747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671966,0.0005176293,0.00014375088,0.00017155199,0.0013116765,0.0011357656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99381727,0.0006258488,0.00032438047,0.00034056243,0.003413021,0.0014788886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002465601,0.00017578647,0.0001660893,0.0010480199,0.010062619,0.0021375187,0.0010903686,0.0016675974,0.019118765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00946159,0.00032397162,0.00047084145,0.0009786064,0.0013468144,0.0006653674,0.0018351105,0.0017849385,0.0021841344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104611,0.0002501682,0.059539724,0.0003172943,0.00005852307,0.00048573627,0.008917467,0.0009411162,0.001648518,0.39931735,0.33645642,0.19196317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005707938,0.00010382707,0.07592984,0.0003135222,0.00005562256,0.00051415164,0.004778788,0.0010227916,0.0015202593,0.0070887357,0.90856314,0.000052243835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95304257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9744692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025530787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13334565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2098285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W244194191","doi":"","title":"The Generative Structure of Aboriginal Rights","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Fundamental rights; Law; Treaty; Constitution; Political science; Sovereignty; International human rights law; Normative; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.007702695397735805,"score_gpt":0.31283345219625414,"score_spread":0.3051307567985183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W244194191","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061378315,0.0017398136,0.02830808,0.019136325,0.00020108664,0.00009125264,0.000073891104,0.000060452116,0.8890109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738149,0.00062774715,0.0037687018,0.0011552966,0.00012400073,0.00007104653,0.000035007848,0.000029554272,0.02037377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99325305,0.002785927,0.0001990808,0.00084464054,0.0018647459,0.0010526231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99574286,0.0019541327,0.0003454266,0.0009788576,0.0006694992,0.0003092403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067043207,0.00024191779,0.00031291877,0.001394004,0.007614004,0.007913058,0.0015364315,0.0020119806,0.0043297973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007939027,0.00036311086,0.00039693623,0.0011172891,0.060912386,0.0046241973,0.0062507805,0.005389358,0.0004516554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.1119055e-7,0.0000012940358,0.000080104066,0.0000035300218,7.362366e-7,0.000016915801,0.0046331463,0.000029951692,0.000039265055,0.99424535,0.00015740015,0.00079145277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008954184,0.000015013122,0.0014458545,0.00010505351,0.000010028479,0.000114374976,0.0053312327,0.00027284928,0.00028609115,0.92600375,0.066389546,0.00001724018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029105583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028594261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029105583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010301701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010118117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074744344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461040750","doi":"10.58188/1941-8043.1540","title":"CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.055419451246552016,"score_gpt":0.32962063004612413,"score_spread":0.2742011787995721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461040750","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052282694,0.0069064675,0.001605194,0.040282317,0.0025144275,0.00011810402,0.0031322727,0.00013440303,0.9400786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2677504,0.008835058,0.007502866,0.014640255,0.0009823572,0.00023227626,0.002187336,0.00023805271,0.6976315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918908,0.0005083725,0.0001883883,0.00082287454,0.004664819,0.0019247483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950553,0.00043314148,0.00014028352,0.0003230075,0.0031140822,0.0009340901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028400887,0.00076260197,0.0005942451,0.0032448312,0.018001417,0.009913268,0.0015146652,0.0034248712,0.018382695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075800065,0.0005092499,0.00048396763,0.0037899124,0.00917188,0.0021464599,0.00277788,0.007752213,0.001803964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000123039335,0.000007311883,0.00034046103,0.000033444474,0.0000031172233,0.00005224942,0.0010281587,0.00018063177,0.00007907859,0.78286225,0.20380875,0.011592185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073597853,0.000003931963,0.0012965044,0.00006526123,0.0000042536635,0.000027494914,0.0003140708,0.000098081815,0.00006516452,0.010745054,0.9873447,0.000028244789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98885113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99197525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10551397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10551397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2331489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.765561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461459292","doi":"","title":"Canadian Cases before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SAS-Space (University of London)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Reading (process); Sociology","score_opus":0.05242796781786223,"score_gpt":0.24171822565574208,"score_spread":0.18929025783787984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461459292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108051345,0.014205261,0.0010560722,0.3477404,0.0030037125,0.00016823328,0.0016229192,0.000109284665,0.5240427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6520922,0.0054812883,0.0011160801,0.0756086,0.00050778274,0.00008620094,0.00037042738,0.00008844641,0.26464897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98669237,0.0010145139,0.000265178,0.0011924536,0.0052575753,0.0055779624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988364,0.0027633132,0.0005095554,0.0004388346,0.005261553,0.0026627341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054106917,0.00049117516,0.0004938309,0.0016317663,0.04500708,0.008584398,0.0022900803,0.0108524095,0.010343907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020667626,0.000995193,0.00068450527,0.004031903,0.0084517505,0.0029115,0.004300358,0.011830328,0.0006402877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007602197,0.000034417753,0.0047137956,0.00013833406,0.000032963806,0.00108776,0.018221444,0.0004037893,0.00042756656,0.5241714,0.43240985,0.018282637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051396983,0.000018802144,0.018353917,0.00022664481,0.000054546697,0.00022885829,0.014969935,0.00031214496,0.00064391847,0.01030245,0.9547025,0.00013483298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99572796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18712597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18712597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29185572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94281864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2464756804","doi":"","title":"Court dismisses constitutional challenge to ban on assisted suicide.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutional court; Political science; Criminal code; Assisted suicide; Criminology; Sociology; Criminal law; Constitution","score_opus":0.11702963401902573,"score_gpt":0.3338465262246891,"score_spread":0.21681689220566336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2464756804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036226787,0.0065038158,0.0011313529,0.46537504,0.0069398344,0.00041408278,0.004329906,0.00022571022,0.47885343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1543364,0.0022674163,0.000989465,0.41212684,0.0017566702,0.00034013353,0.0012204627,0.00008765272,0.42687503],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888099,0.000507729,0.0004015307,0.0008036793,0.005254264,0.0042229067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99248636,0.0017396504,0.0002081512,0.00033556408,0.0037901767,0.0014401193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049565034,0.000705041,0.00080134254,0.0014055262,0.02535851,0.007992481,0.0040198234,0.02561062,0.007505457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018680574,0.0012085134,0.00112038,0.0014577071,0.0072320206,0.0019823387,0.0032554297,0.021380946,0.0018622865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000949917,0.00005293033,0.0034463713,0.00007054318,0.000045841294,0.0010470899,0.0045051337,0.00019707231,0.0009903935,0.35063544,0.62984145,0.009072804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017485135,0.000053856133,0.0155887855,0.00033163145,0.00010703924,0.00019794008,0.0029413358,0.00035303534,0.00066770514,0.009834765,0.96960664,0.00014258422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97297263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9906578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97297263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054826178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.123100646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39779365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468615915","doi":"10.1017/s0963180116000025","title":"Physician-Assisted Death in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Supreme court; Law; Declaration; Assisted suicide; Criminal code; Right to die; Political science; Living Wills; Government (linguistics); Medicine; Criminal law; Health care","score_opus":0.07460871032314151,"score_gpt":0.35983236702849103,"score_spread":0.28522365670534955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2468615915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14979993,0.036542054,0.0010976964,0.36676142,0.0038178647,0.00019760805,0.0010105656,0.00009384363,0.440679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8448536,0.019095618,0.0010583489,0.06234712,0.00041193995,0.000051072144,0.00033188573,0.000057975616,0.071792446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99501306,0.0006382598,0.00015546929,0.00035262477,0.0018707635,0.001969717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985187,0.0019364305,0.00067252177,0.00025282454,0.0049752113,0.0069760475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002740715,0.00022238668,0.0003347991,0.0012622386,0.020618735,0.004813269,0.00187574,0.0037750765,0.010887184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012136257,0.00032885317,0.00033601758,0.0027335123,0.00653315,0.0014560062,0.0035447313,0.0061056297,0.00045735147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008092872,0.00019080572,0.02961398,0.0004345778,0.00003646116,0.0030927588,0.035272397,0.00083302415,0.00035583143,0.50776905,0.31715837,0.10516182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000656625,0.000061814055,0.062954746,0.0010021367,0.00003460332,0.00095443486,0.023543812,0.0008057542,0.00023981516,0.015630467,0.894558,0.00014882653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9935348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13877627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13877627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33162445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99889743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2473269292","doi":"","title":"Support for Adult Children in Canada: When Does Childhood End?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Legislation; Child support; Political science; Social support; Income Support; Psychology; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.005789281456243354,"score_gpt":0.2382224155201625,"score_spread":0.23243313406391913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2473269292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42454907,0.13906474,0.00050884817,0.22193326,0.0012903524,0.00017038119,0.004548606,0.00006239496,0.20787235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9137171,0.05696522,0.000580505,0.014057075,0.00019364446,0.000045617733,0.00095819146,0.000031881344,0.013450849],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99593014,0.00019596374,0.00011426454,0.0001938326,0.0014867494,0.002079103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99141437,0.0005843885,0.00081659254,0.000097417265,0.0037749333,0.0033123023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019963575,0.00027893926,0.0004812966,0.0028238802,0.016347373,0.005955976,0.0021160617,0.0019171623,0.0043615433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007999399,0.0003397995,0.0003847028,0.008487888,0.0046935314,0.0022685672,0.003029822,0.0035054702,0.00025949773],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013240355,0.00013182474,0.36737004,0.0012521857,0.0000590698,0.0039800964,0.11540372,0.00039958738,0.0003200625,0.09809756,0.17684734,0.23600608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002337341,0.0000402207,0.44773138,0.003726713,0.00008645857,0.0012153676,0.20041536,0.00022483218,0.00024956636,0.0040620347,0.3421033,0.00012141372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99829465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1681692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1681692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30078647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96480584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477165663","doi":"10.29173/alr377","title":"Forging Alberta's Constitutional Framework, Richard Connors &amp; John M. Law, eds.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.06634414393547833,"score_gpt":0.3534451702740703,"score_spread":0.28710102633859197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477165663","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00075385545,0.7056466,0.0014486196,0.06305998,0.0043567475,0.000030916028,0.0003765887,0.00012312151,0.22420354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050524257,0.61084104,0.005007355,0.031600688,0.0030938499,0.0001039232,0.00078890723,0.00019492365,0.2978451],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960466,0.000558452,0.000114889845,0.0002932959,0.0024585365,0.00052810734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975452,0.00082837365,0.0001266029,0.0001240861,0.0010931033,0.00028257398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004539589,0.0009993702,0.00071329315,0.004409161,0.006970569,0.011831966,0.0031206936,0.005320128,0.013927366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056756935,0.00092083984,0.00054987107,0.0070253676,0.011730889,0.0050178063,0.0016605392,0.00409961,0.0030545173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011476262,0.000013695513,0.00027277798,0.00028756046,0.000008680435,0.00009050537,0.0010732056,0.00034716146,0.00007806761,0.20786262,0.71143305,0.07852127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003180913,0.000002427733,0.0009904495,0.00047331143,0.0000073444435,0.000040699186,0.00060185505,0.00004103013,0.000048074784,0.02139401,0.9763825,0.000015157496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8803024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94504076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11969757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05763038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11278395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41813958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2478908027","doi":"10.1007/978-94-017-9885-3_14","title":"Later Scholastic Philosophy of Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholasticism; Nominalism; Trope (literature); Philosophy; Allegiance; Scholarship; Historiography; Middle Ages; Aristotelianism; Of Reformation; Period (music); Classics; Fifteenth; Quarter (Canadian coin); Theology; Literature; History; Art; Law; Epistemology; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.10747924469052322,"score_gpt":0.32996179424102345,"score_spread":0.22248254955050023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2478908027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031895237,0.0063296617,0.005915779,0.010217807,0.0012456006,0.000015246694,0.00005393538,0.00003845952,0.97299397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11742455,0.0038089307,0.0019559492,0.0038056269,0.00065806176,0.000045443343,0.00004675816,0.0000923393,0.8721625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951375,0.00020695594,0.000016495598,0.000059898422,0.00014060197,0.0000623069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995012,0.00023551854,0.000022309201,0.00004795864,0.00013780793,0.000055152756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010789478,0.00043248426,0.00024224809,0.0008125284,0.0031408363,0.0046480363,0.00059211004,0.001651739,0.019220978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016177432,0.00015020934,0.00016655221,0.0008503141,0.007853901,0.0040628533,0.001429384,0.004046659,0.0030268908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016389126,0.0000048514567,0.000019652187,0.000009400606,4.3176772e-7,0.0000073052843,0.0008985054,0.000022772469,0.00001530854,0.98403686,0.011079364,0.003904072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036902497,0.0000052919345,0.00013457479,0.0000859958,0.0000014184099,0.000045203557,0.0007098437,0.00021765841,0.000101525526,0.4267341,0.57195604,0.000004628226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00862201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019021345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019220978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005735144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039452775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0643006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2479455347","doi":"10.1163/ej.9789004172326.i-395.109","title":"Chapter Ten. Religious Confession Privilege In Canada And New Zealand","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confession (law); Privilege (computing); History; Genealogy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0361981523712043,"score_gpt":0.25667099479801003,"score_spread":0.22047284242680573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2479455347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013567465,0.03622349,0.00047168825,0.014039295,0.001209474,0.00007890538,0.0004132139,0.000037126454,0.93395936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11130719,0.031899326,0.00085527,0.0031087117,0.00017427377,0.000058374015,0.00025277346,0.00004704918,0.852297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995326,0.000027296679,0.000009368266,0.00003711392,0.00024867366,0.00014499624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972457,0.000048610917,0.000015804817,0.00001023861,0.000138963,0.000061716644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032662755,0.00033296784,0.00023512865,0.0009828531,0.008648535,0.0040679406,0.0006863042,0.0013577382,0.015810294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007896752,0.00021353278,0.00025606307,0.0021926954,0.0033647509,0.0013629879,0.00087256037,0.0020637803,0.001254144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019578947,0.00004570529,0.0017703292,0.0003481968,0.0000056270574,0.00041225558,0.022690604,0.0002927646,0.0005772521,0.47929814,0.3698879,0.12465166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022296304,0.000004930525,0.0049438532,0.0003143267,0.0000047085105,0.00012776417,0.00543905,0.000049414204,0.00011847703,0.0046555214,0.98432666,0.000012990749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96369106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04300349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04300349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06033428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31201357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2480329367","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280919.003.0013","title":"13 Unmarried Couples: The Legal Consequences of the Ending of the Relationship","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; History; Political science; Sociology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.0772799621729947,"score_gpt":0.3146808453764198,"score_spread":0.23740088320342512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2480329367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24808924,0.01951759,0.0013759442,0.029300686,0.0007401922,0.000027964386,0.000088035944,0.000019177494,0.7008411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91317976,0.007772741,0.00032585056,0.0033275986,0.0003041065,0.000019990397,0.000036075522,0.000011330727,0.07502247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922585,0.0005032687,0.000017135915,0.000039687966,0.00012286162,0.000091201444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998914,0.0005572121,0.00016579159,0.00006297715,0.0001359234,0.0001641862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001608562,0.00010767292,0.00020026727,0.00036236268,0.0038098078,0.002192589,0.0005842594,0.0011329629,0.011072912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034684702,0.00013587378,0.00013338096,0.0005122303,0.002931995,0.0015463665,0.0017864922,0.0032153851,0.00070684403],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004697129,0.00013571828,0.005682315,0.000093370814,0.000008504521,0.005508437,0.0950354,0.00026116995,0.00021556983,0.7601093,0.033530746,0.099372454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003068677,0.00015519615,0.017363293,0.0011598165,0.000028645227,0.007579514,0.13872777,0.0009966281,0.00064385054,0.19214398,0.64112765,0.000042912357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005546539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012939162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011072912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010655285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012452186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03704256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482862444","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198268956.003.0013","title":"Constitutional Continuity and Constitutional Independence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Constitution; Sovereignty; Relation (database); Political science; Constitutional law; Separation of powers; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Politics; Statistics","score_opus":0.033378225285023724,"score_gpt":0.2527967149183283,"score_spread":0.21941848963330457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2482862444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012591147,0.0029321464,0.007684715,0.004370067,0.00012174761,0.000035357258,0.00007239018,0.000025754984,0.9721667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8618405,0.002840517,0.0032024859,0.0014210863,0.00023409627,0.00009115357,0.00015447887,0.000041510386,0.1301741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981048,0.00062658853,0.000052502448,0.00028896102,0.0006092874,0.00031778985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985039,0.0007461549,0.000090803194,0.00025782431,0.0002625038,0.0001388859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019781168,0.00018479142,0.00032861027,0.0012612796,0.003369252,0.0037366748,0.00064792536,0.0009844467,0.016499693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002896935,0.00021687754,0.0002522639,0.0010947166,0.019664427,0.00399582,0.0031485148,0.004020186,0.00067434635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010505491,0.0000015506356,0.000034203636,0.0000054217667,5.649017e-7,0.000010279966,0.00055801385,0.000050045615,0.000015021776,0.99728847,0.00067309994,0.001362338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000098898245,0.000011589843,0.00092309015,0.00014814977,0.000006567455,0.000074148724,0.001268687,0.00023448092,0.0001462234,0.77256906,0.22460032,0.0000077973655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016003747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011714548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016499693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065376544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004998873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2485948902","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195366815.001.0001","title":"Common Law Marriage","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Common law; Law; Comparative law; Political science; Public law; Marriage law; Civil law (Civil law); Doctrine; Family law; Legal history; Legislature; Municipal law; Sociology","score_opus":0.043493508917421174,"score_gpt":0.3140786401829414,"score_spread":0.27058513126552025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2485948902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019092632,0.006993672,0.002341414,0.0029617872,0.0006198316,0.00003284809,0.000056505054,0.000025689518,0.985059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13223733,0.017555473,0.0026243343,0.004864453,0.00095433614,0.000091305956,0.00029038163,0.000073485724,0.84130895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936134,0.00018544903,0.000025112784,0.00010147271,0.00025229773,0.00007424397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997352,0.000091935886,0.000019229008,0.00004321224,0.00008048594,0.000030067224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004033054,0.00031260183,0.0003068308,0.00097326963,0.0028384929,0.0024923484,0.00052473764,0.0008772279,0.031050302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010211505,0.00011986357,0.00027360948,0.0010018565,0.0032807027,0.0025457612,0.001745655,0.0017066012,0.004719039],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032062487,0.000016434782,0.00013803838,0.000035940982,0.0000016533229,0.00007850914,0.0014348836,0.00012619342,0.000040909465,0.892747,0.06695666,0.03842062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011029803,0.000010103081,0.00030460945,0.00016970487,0.0000014897627,0.00017816291,0.0007451865,0.00013169761,0.00006836742,0.07272166,0.9256644,0.0000036039385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005934441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007408671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031050302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023648916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020025661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10387361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2487090102","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567751.003.0005","title":"Resisting Temptations to ‘Justice’","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Discretion; Unjust enrichment; Politics; Subject (documents); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Restitution","score_opus":0.07950535248798295,"score_gpt":0.3524223187860604,"score_spread":0.27291696629807743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2487090102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010415229,0.0024190317,0.01430817,0.0417278,0.0006535002,0.000028529928,0.000017163688,0.00010422895,0.9303263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80499214,0.0019770479,0.008897382,0.025565429,0.0008777858,0.00010380765,0.000049570328,0.00023063814,0.1573062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99189067,0.0038417594,0.00020926313,0.0009784129,0.0024118552,0.0006679008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957533,0.0024958607,0.00020332026,0.0006635471,0.0006742497,0.00020970633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067526326,0.00036110778,0.00045349923,0.0010102311,0.0038796635,0.0070463717,0.0011267413,0.0037883304,0.0056957984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010579899,0.00028608387,0.00039015617,0.00060317194,0.03422922,0.006809237,0.0045579844,0.0076854727,0.0013524172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022967176,0.0000030591334,0.000025692025,0.000008830345,0.0000012620058,0.000021524114,0.0011489226,0.00005375507,0.000048604157,0.9923044,0.0040312903,0.0023503178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007771184,0.000009094919,0.00009654683,0.00008823126,0.000003823344,0.00007064602,0.0009892969,0.00033518558,0.00028028208,0.753336,0.24477457,0.000008585289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023920564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00433308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070463717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003950916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029640307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035711706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2488724390","doi":"","title":"Wandering Without a Torch: Federalism as a Guiding Light","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Cooperative federalism; Dual federalism; Doctrine; Individualism; Politics; Law; New Federalism; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Constitutional law; Charter; Sociology","score_opus":0.03417181496405478,"score_gpt":0.31277231725637644,"score_spread":0.27860050229232164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2488724390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030956361,0.035897844,0.011532255,0.2932051,0.0013367097,0.00006155024,0.00015390049,0.00009570792,0.6267606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93352014,0.010049804,0.0035548483,0.01424872,0.00040743768,0.000042599106,0.00005143306,0.000055429195,0.03806971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967849,0.0010229283,0.00004525599,0.00024451045,0.00060018146,0.0013021425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986444,0.00063727325,0.00011313586,0.00009321429,0.00027801932,0.00023405033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029976277,0.00020425572,0.00034420367,0.0009342956,0.015150722,0.010490483,0.0015193224,0.0039731734,0.002258492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057912646,0.00023989743,0.000383491,0.0020442673,0.023505758,0.0046876036,0.0022662738,0.005687978,0.0002420463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017168559,0.0000014903433,0.000063193096,0.000005198159,6.117751e-7,0.000021274924,0.0009437927,0.000110084766,0.000010343503,0.99229735,0.0047114003,0.0018334344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010143999,0.0000067806322,0.0011498347,0.00015641838,0.000008970268,0.00004463611,0.0033932242,0.00086765114,0.00013793385,0.69727844,0.29692352,0.00002244697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8318812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84707576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8318812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060465403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07253742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43870926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2490928964","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199543670.003.0009","title":"Law and Religion","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Morality; Law; Public morality; Diversity (politics); Morality and religion; Rest (music); Political science; Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033897120400284066,"score_gpt":0.2376156440210364,"score_spread":0.20371852362075235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2490928964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016159847,0.030380936,0.00057376985,0.010578812,0.0005419142,0.000016907996,0.0000738187,0.000034035304,0.9561839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.187429,0.04230058,0.0020528247,0.012926314,0.0010020788,0.000072120565,0.0001972702,0.000087299515,0.7539325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922884,0.00015303055,0.000015529246,0.00006671977,0.0003417311,0.00019417105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966264,0.00010254536,0.000019322279,0.00003195442,0.000105319494,0.00007820801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005000162,0.00040366143,0.00034371408,0.0011027772,0.0085734315,0.0055259196,0.00081825245,0.0017768034,0.023751132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010188115,0.00017663598,0.00015462146,0.0018000904,0.013878754,0.002444083,0.0017715085,0.002409485,0.0034850517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019672475,0.0000066023586,0.00013837224,0.000048152364,0.0000010832091,0.000040619067,0.0046441727,0.000057681304,0.000056540415,0.9055112,0.061375942,0.028117666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015468833,0.000003074251,0.00043228938,0.00018438726,9.736589e-7,0.000043025553,0.0018650669,0.000021522123,0.000019698984,0.051237132,0.9461874,0.0000038114986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38939428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5830252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38939428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01781787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016849976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7742555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493931398","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004331","title":"Gender, Multiculturalism and Dialogue: The Case of Jewish Divorce","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Judaism; Negotiation; Law; Sociology; Political science; Power (physics); Family law; Civil law (Civil law); Ethnic group; Gender studies; Public law","score_opus":0.05870838004157729,"score_gpt":0.305949515897247,"score_spread":0.2472411358556697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493931398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73991233,0.005127926,0.002034328,0.098106265,0.00066923536,0.00006272802,0.00002094639,0.000027251848,0.15403906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882252,0.0005833631,0.00030750566,0.004767755,0.00007698691,0.000015227359,0.0000039343095,0.00000785748,0.0060120416],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99041766,0.0055248477,0.00011374647,0.00036914795,0.0008898537,0.002684705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954391,0.002595345,0.0002908717,0.00014233936,0.000503429,0.0010289537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009391898,0.00044110656,0.0006686963,0.0011934811,0.06746408,0.007885084,0.0020324606,0.009181874,0.002764413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010420211,0.0004573617,0.00066664733,0.0012758401,0.03927179,0.0045957346,0.009190728,0.009146651,0.00019391747],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000303859,0.00003464481,0.0018666898,0.000025255236,0.000009553645,0.0057561323,0.77384514,0.00006630001,0.00020979012,0.21096493,0.002453025,0.0047381786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048912145,0.00004054542,0.002570352,0.00015446318,0.00003135032,0.0020206792,0.8694408,0.0003890382,0.00035225446,0.029190093,0.09570713,0.000054398857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4329762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5490668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5670238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030783188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020563623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86091197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493935367","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198252481.003.0009","title":"Living Together Less Contentiously—The Jurisprudence of Reconciliation in the 1990s","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; State (computer science); Appearance of impropriety; Theme (computing); Political science; Law; Settlement (finance); Closure (psychology); Sociology","score_opus":0.06851273167562791,"score_gpt":0.31160836190576596,"score_spread":0.24309563023013805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493935367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031597316,0.031842727,0.0091228215,0.05956252,0.00082805834,0.00007741463,0.00002194632,0.000048374706,0.8668987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90333545,0.0075327745,0.004170025,0.0051071555,0.00053234433,0.000098269746,0.000025173145,0.000060213675,0.079138584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855988,0.008398063,0.00032788276,0.0008638721,0.0036506597,0.0011606929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934441,0.0039326935,0.00040291963,0.0007923296,0.001068445,0.00035953347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014572414,0.00038873593,0.0006995218,0.0018759863,0.009645246,0.00989982,0.002401948,0.0051732697,0.0018971583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011220401,0.00043602212,0.0003664608,0.0020613326,0.07119405,0.0074174814,0.00602794,0.008394421,0.00025946012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019958352,0.0000063713906,0.00004583942,0.000017850442,0.0000013858116,0.000055160224,0.021500463,0.00007480508,0.00003772295,0.9720908,0.0022500241,0.0039175604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015318166,0.000022594972,0.0009890642,0.00056725723,0.00000770159,0.00016582303,0.015706562,0.00047704065,0.0001794887,0.4806974,0.50115335,0.000018319286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14315067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14566028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14315067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039552763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028320823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28697675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2497269033","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199216451.003.0022","title":"18 From Vatican II to Mississauga—Lessons in Receptive Ecumenical Learning from the Anglican—Roman Catholic Bilateral Dialogue Process","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecumenism; Christian ministry; Faith; Gospel; Collegiality; Aesthetics; Sociology; Theology; Political science; Psychology; Art; Pedagogy; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07566102278543274,"score_gpt":0.33500815786795735,"score_spread":0.2593471350825246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2497269033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19734524,0.0042654425,0.003490518,0.02005238,0.00060726196,0.00007165337,0.000016974249,0.00006034503,0.7740901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91165096,0.0008196043,0.00080705574,0.0015048516,0.000083657855,0.00004769714,0.000012945157,0.000043824573,0.08502946],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972861,0.0020653023,0.00003341971,0.00014091212,0.00022377538,0.0002506041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827635,0.0011971433,0.00006773846,0.00008778139,0.00012714123,0.00024386442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004060693,0.00028993216,0.00028330286,0.00048722417,0.012264122,0.006960664,0.0010383254,0.0019171668,0.0072825416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047883745,0.00022036397,0.00017234594,0.0004901217,0.015575632,0.0043007396,0.0057753487,0.005121469,0.0006862794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017052103,0.000044906523,0.0002921006,0.00006400253,0.0000017921406,0.0008201912,0.4894962,0.00006396483,0.00022655968,0.48008224,0.008091146,0.020799836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017261895,0.000063209896,0.0012839738,0.0005133684,0.0000037313278,0.0004611369,0.37871256,0.0003175195,0.00047223453,0.03421362,0.58392185,0.000019454674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00801304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015867624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.991987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006786952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034174204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049243033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2500609355","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139060516.021","title":"Constitution of Upper Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Content (measure theory); Computer science; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03565767890668799,"score_gpt":0.2193787098942711,"score_spread":0.18372103098758313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2500609355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025160108,0.005983383,0.00048867957,0.0068185744,0.00068427814,0.00006519525,0.0027334203,0.00010862036,0.9806018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042281073,0.0039916774,0.000987109,0.0032096854,0.00009917813,0.00008771859,0.0011166594,0.00012414409,0.9481026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971359,0.00014723056,0.00006380901,0.00030787374,0.0014129491,0.00093222404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890924,0.00007417374,0.000021446747,0.00008415332,0.0007547208,0.00015624381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009327866,0.00069913827,0.00061139505,0.002251058,0.012550108,0.008376983,0.0015540317,0.002567807,0.04812292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024252879,0.00049697654,0.00040048143,0.0036090622,0.0035222634,0.0018584729,0.0020907202,0.0041414206,0.0054769833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013643381,0.000011099683,0.00035573717,0.000062744235,0.0000055595597,0.00007219255,0.0012561455,0.00015156856,0.0001524107,0.7177765,0.26062542,0.019516824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025260297,0.0000016982154,0.0010231622,0.000076810014,0.000004205874,0.000020676762,0.00035743945,0.000050477443,0.00007824626,0.005431761,0.99293923,0.000013732889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98224753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.989819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08322807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08322807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12639546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60386467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2502354050","doi":"10.5040/9781501356216.ch-001","title":"‘Find love in Canada’: Distributed selves, abstraction, and the problem of privacy and autonomy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Bloomsbury Academic eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Abstraction; Internet privacy; Computer security; Computer science; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.022621505921255013,"score_gpt":0.25291205676158257,"score_spread":0.23029055084032757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2502354050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1549641,0.00859644,0.023012064,0.13049941,0.0006911786,0.000106299165,0.00009676794,0.00008337035,0.6819504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624522,0.002073913,0.001966764,0.004257108,0.000094870054,0.000051195693,0.000034129353,0.00005034169,0.029019456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916829,0.00410735,0.000116517054,0.0006453012,0.002122911,0.0013248716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963722,0.0012209808,0.00028151803,0.00046919702,0.00076608587,0.0008900585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005336678,0.0005306974,0.0006459321,0.0011288158,0.028495809,0.018085498,0.002169762,0.0039469157,0.005646217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008314237,0.00036754998,0.00048784225,0.0017302091,0.08777791,0.013678576,0.012255398,0.0080630975,0.0005970889],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001735303,0.00001606691,0.0010446779,0.000027156088,0.000009756715,0.00030472325,0.30396965,0.0001536248,0.00011440469,0.67729306,0.0057076444,0.0113419015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016968586,0.000022433895,0.0017137169,0.00022266562,0.0000135853725,0.0006618369,0.28314787,0.00067593553,0.00018518575,0.42898184,0.28429022,0.00006773481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3036007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25705096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69639933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02366678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017911397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6036671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503800980","doi":"10.2307/4135186","title":"The Marriage of Roman Soldiers (13 B.C.-A.D. 235): Law and Family in the Imperial Army","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Phoenix","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Ancient history; Political science; History","score_opus":0.0187216192719451,"score_gpt":0.2857187943391229,"score_spread":0.2669971750671778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503800980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9074586,0.017154263,0.000094604846,0.028803417,0.0002626101,0.000029974673,0.000100655634,0.000006531152,0.046089314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709203,0.009654204,0.00006615199,0.0014598873,0.00014476839,0.0000127492385,0.000022796918,0.0000050337126,0.017714007],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995703,0.00019847305,0.000013457132,0.000040481646,0.00003130026,0.00014596933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970466,0.00007858805,0.000054009222,0.000008348801,0.000025837187,0.00012850924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010174434,0.00018226057,0.0001780508,0.0005941225,0.0064975526,0.001905243,0.00048149296,0.0009244688,0.00338731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092033774,0.00028475648,0.00008933018,0.001109752,0.0034883206,0.0010088134,0.00148504,0.0019333675,0.00027070232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003661718,0.00035554712,0.081430264,0.000339187,0.000045076482,0.004676948,0.61184704,0.00043775127,0.0012106156,0.14654009,0.063168295,0.089583054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046944246,0.00033009736,0.21447214,0.00049180846,0.00003928253,0.0023550903,0.48701587,0.00033509283,0.0011116546,0.006526271,0.28722525,0.00005053819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11849789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3139782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11849789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033903923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020816203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23561633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504227454","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4516","title":"WHEN DISCIPLINES COLLIDE: POLYGAMY AND THE SOCIAL SCIENCES ON TRIAL","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Adjudication; Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1590766274158785,"score_gpt":0.42674200413142765,"score_spread":0.26766537671554913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504227454","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039387036,0.030226577,0.0053616124,0.61596954,0.0025405034,0.000088579305,0.00007833514,0.000037260626,0.30631056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8459026,0.0116248,0.0026595478,0.11085625,0.0025408943,0.00025100287,0.000062172854,0.00007926755,0.026023455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9273409,0.04600542,0.0018640886,0.003930366,0.011726398,0.009132768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9022465,0.08112084,0.0031717103,0.003351694,0.0052671046,0.004842151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.064664826,0.00038392353,0.0012097182,0.0040652193,0.027943466,0.032833535,0.0029007501,0.018722842,0.008230931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.121839106,0.0005591212,0.0005915434,0.0033931923,0.08619568,0.020984715,0.019665172,0.017239505,0.0009148817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003080189,0.000018926501,0.0014211802,0.000056304638,0.000011805988,0.00038191496,0.014554509,0.00010334806,0.000043105265,0.9464192,0.018729057,0.018229922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004633183,0.000031150958,0.002710004,0.0010307747,0.000022317197,0.00018265376,0.028218025,0.00030584345,0.00015646718,0.8328214,0.1344149,0.00006006223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.094580345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14147992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094580345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021557404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047355812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3419844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504625780","doi":"10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31254-5","title":"Finding a balance: Canada's law on medical assistance in dying","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Lancet","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; CancerCare Manitoba; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Law; House of Commons; Legislation; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Political science; Charter; Criminal code; Government (linguistics); Medicine; Criminal law; History; Politics","score_opus":0.04654313457790404,"score_gpt":0.32630928757785604,"score_spread":0.279766152999952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504625780","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040539566,0.01005167,0.00028352102,0.86788845,0.0024994323,0.000051253435,0.0005359346,0.000016300979,0.078133866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.540149,0.0058132205,0.00085167075,0.41826165,0.0010788873,0.00011123065,0.00019916015,0.000084136125,0.03345105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97380865,0.0058770385,0.0010362287,0.0013447575,0.007969337,0.009963908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9523902,0.020067068,0.0021394072,0.0011505663,0.01224882,0.012003924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017664079,0.000511358,0.0011759031,0.0021843787,0.04008336,0.01630625,0.0053499048,0.025679272,0.0107049225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07007583,0.00074298563,0.00084406714,0.0050555184,0.020688385,0.0075909873,0.0081704175,0.02670658,0.00061243697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021950336,0.00013984734,0.012118795,0.0003165907,0.00009954011,0.00049382227,0.043128937,0.00030044827,0.00022677759,0.547459,0.3534525,0.04204425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036493098,0.00012137673,0.07650639,0.004267108,0.0003577999,0.0004680503,0.15135348,0.0006357748,0.00072876026,0.112540826,0.6521113,0.00054428563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98923165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99541795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.111724265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.111724265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3649448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81062007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504732619","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579815.003.0010","title":"Concluding Comparatively: Discovery in the English Colonies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aotearoa; Doctrine; Indigenous; Scientific discovery; History; Data science; Genealogy; Geography; Political science; Computer science; Law; Psychology; Biology; Ecology; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.05833195601123116,"score_gpt":0.2771313415853785,"score_spread":0.21879938557414735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504732619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01241196,0.016020473,0.0010529198,0.018093502,0.0010132873,0.00001681876,0.000025633344,0.00001578458,0.9513496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27074134,0.01489886,0.0013480076,0.008598271,0.0007233257,0.000056867662,0.000061827246,0.000060368813,0.70351106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966776,0.00012787175,0.000010656014,0.000034333763,0.00010287392,0.00005660546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961984,0.00022609507,0.000019336567,0.00002571271,0.000079226935,0.000029737344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061562675,0.00019557118,0.00021702111,0.00051014434,0.0029105118,0.0026576638,0.00041483282,0.00085879624,0.007734773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001039418,0.0001237069,0.0001406372,0.00061505346,0.0043093855,0.0024748023,0.0012625175,0.002221623,0.0007336022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013582561,0.000015468016,0.00021991185,0.00008269778,0.0000016533428,0.00021576308,0.019656524,0.00009255964,0.00016990084,0.8902114,0.06589832,0.02342223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036723684,0.0000074803656,0.00065926707,0.00024397895,0.0000022425947,0.00013744851,0.009177346,0.000099050885,0.0001934433,0.04239172,0.9470795,0.000004815168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019081173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044821173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019081173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042030304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019512344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037940204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2506582110","doi":"10.29173/alr11","title":"The Last Case [Reprint — (1978) 16:1 Alta. L. Rev. 1]","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Division (mathematics); Sociology; History; Art; Mathematics; Visual arts","score_opus":0.03485739077736608,"score_gpt":0.3327982125207901,"score_spread":0.297940821743424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2506582110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028256914,0.07756178,0.0006223901,0.15762569,0.015282249,0.000074137075,0.002222572,0.00024153672,0.743544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.085152276,0.028317565,0.00075541093,0.11102969,0.007655322,0.00015924909,0.0013112265,0.00018875836,0.7654305],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724716,0.00024645546,0.000077362725,0.00026954417,0.0014146337,0.00074470177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802965,0.0005811195,0.00012287637,0.0001344287,0.0009495907,0.0001823628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015768936,0.0006986887,0.00045643747,0.0021993187,0.007951858,0.005736928,0.0018742176,0.007979841,0.029556552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047168043,0.00060880167,0.00073902623,0.0027259805,0.004114378,0.0022317723,0.0010938373,0.006616374,0.01083224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008844174,0.0000075536927,0.00024339026,0.000053460797,0.000004401918,0.000102863,0.00041388653,0.00004504646,0.0000541728,0.04379957,0.9484495,0.0068172948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005353041,0.000006659071,0.0022304608,0.00018107958,0.0000127888,0.000059636415,0.0003343621,0.000031101645,0.00007619682,0.0035746468,0.9934738,0.000013883249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6891775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8211303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3108225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017858388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015374845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62530595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507876249","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.2.314","title":"Indian Act Sex Discrimination: Enough Inquiry Already, Just Fix It","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sex discrimination; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.065825242173339,"score_gpt":0.3111458523708563,"score_spread":0.24532061019751727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507876249","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018759625,0.015490439,0.000788671,0.8331148,0.007596617,0.000022938615,0.000063464824,0.0000444271,0.12411898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51700145,0.018560039,0.0025895603,0.3978893,0.0053500277,0.000062866544,0.00006593977,0.00008535161,0.058395565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935343,0.0020273433,0.00022833192,0.00043751663,0.002017619,0.0017548329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935648,0.0025159488,0.00036016747,0.00048392854,0.0020508517,0.0010242569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053335335,0.00039674705,0.00062052964,0.0010114542,0.019038936,0.011189363,0.0015381565,0.0068173334,0.0042731557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0120628625,0.00026300977,0.00062609394,0.0014256068,0.026745187,0.0077035525,0.0046052923,0.01580433,0.00093467446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000340727,0.00009005703,0.004191869,0.00022401613,0.000020176549,0.0004772222,0.06341976,0.000072304494,0.0006581061,0.75398195,0.13334501,0.043485448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074163763,0.000039910738,0.004362325,0.0015083048,0.00006310614,0.00040418838,0.12228862,0.000079505546,0.0005813414,0.08760026,0.78297126,0.00009374244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17742033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2509852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8225797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011029501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02864298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35277522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508186192","doi":"10.7202/1119729ar","title":"What Section 15 has Achieved","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"World Federation of Science Journalists","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Humanities; Politics; Scrutiny; Nomination; Charter; Ethnology; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.21246143555800287,"score_gpt":0.4305056061130309,"score_spread":0.21804417055502803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508186192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01577776,0.0032835258,0.002722354,0.08239599,0.006696904,0.00011764522,0.0004441841,0.00018229296,0.8883794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31551188,0.0041232156,0.0055657495,0.17659655,0.0024963364,0.00028628294,0.0010120383,0.00056389044,0.49384406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98050344,0.0020372241,0.00060793833,0.0024539386,0.0070322817,0.0073651765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98861545,0.0012439182,0.00053763617,0.0010630846,0.0061783595,0.0023614732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014537635,0.00049897825,0.0004890791,0.0014309612,0.012915043,0.017162394,0.0020465497,0.0077609583,0.038267586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022341497,0.0005268345,0.0008978529,0.00096704264,0.010057096,0.007841697,0.005729907,0.006733174,0.008623633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026759823,0.000038778704,0.0027699333,0.00020702824,0.000021274709,0.00013863185,0.005757167,0.00008250107,0.0005810976,0.8383099,0.110984765,0.041082226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007863808,0.000032581866,0.002998527,0.00039051325,0.00001966491,0.00007194573,0.0035917333,0.000035881334,0.0007140229,0.029262634,0.96282953,0.0000450133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41030517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42305982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41030517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02596961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0626749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81583387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510209270","doi":"","title":"Noting the Obvious: A Reflection on the Supreme Court of Canada’s Application of Judicial Notice under Sections 7 and 15 of the “Charter”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Reflection (computer programming); Computer science","score_opus":0.029353216067322264,"score_gpt":0.2720005618493013,"score_spread":0.24264734578197905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510209270","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02924044,0.0024208128,0.002089772,0.889051,0.0050311317,0.00014141161,0.00034063694,0.000085713815,0.071599014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15689388,0.0008332588,0.0015408382,0.78922343,0.0013091955,0.00010790437,0.00007801074,0.00021549195,0.049797937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9348227,0.01165915,0.002264671,0.009292069,0.017880322,0.024081018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94205374,0.02659703,0.002033818,0.0014635329,0.020110333,0.0077416603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04132385,0.0010335797,0.0017778202,0.0027319854,0.0722796,0.03991724,0.013574696,0.08693731,0.009294878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085489295,0.0026561753,0.0030384548,0.0043784957,0.042240538,0.010606786,0.007920024,0.093293495,0.0009189397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090303954,0.000093110546,0.0025569117,0.00009977584,0.00013638755,0.0013925068,0.06002546,0.0008090801,0.0011119648,0.47032133,0.4561746,0.007188521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018753397,0.00006461424,0.007187427,0.0008432532,0.00021100619,0.0001987753,0.06196414,0.0012823138,0.0014791377,0.05660155,0.8690438,0.00093647226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98277205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99082804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18295579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18295579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3190867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9476555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510880950","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2015.0020","title":"Revisiting Qúebec's &lt;I&gt;Jus Commune&lt;/I&gt; in the Era of the Human Rights Charters","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Political science; Civil code; Human rights; Doctrine; Civil law (Civil law); Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Public law","score_opus":0.061877203646745885,"score_gpt":0.35406543297975,"score_spread":0.29218822933300415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510880950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19644664,0.022162978,0.0035694493,0.1557372,0.0016731253,0.00009960585,0.0011239855,0.000102831116,0.61908424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9307681,0.00400552,0.0019078619,0.011568044,0.0001750467,0.000031381274,0.00014652239,0.000039942894,0.05135752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784493,0.00051239907,0.000036905083,0.00019444729,0.00064822816,0.00076312886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996843,0.00075546774,0.0001841797,0.00011331724,0.001647476,0.00045653284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002029702,0.0003337503,0.000278897,0.0018339595,0.01655594,0.007852946,0.0012672505,0.0019864417,0.006503453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003599821,0.00015732748,0.0003327765,0.0024639857,0.010951207,0.0022667442,0.0015087697,0.0029244395,0.0002437861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034384346,0.000040644998,0.0075119697,0.0001496398,0.000018190316,0.0008682542,0.0324744,0.0010048397,0.00057376886,0.85675865,0.06839507,0.03217015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018577692,0.000032983346,0.043452244,0.0007908669,0.00004500385,0.00026666428,0.06141113,0.0023311581,0.0007390502,0.031548128,0.85923856,0.00012565998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9958788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99827886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1462809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1462809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14903688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9901931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511066864","doi":"","title":"The Fight for Substantive Equality: Women's Activism and Section 15 Of The Charter of Rights","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journals @ The Mount (Mount Saint Vincent University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Federated Co-operatives (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Charter; Political science; Humanities; Law; Art","score_opus":0.04261236098889637,"score_gpt":0.28505370369669375,"score_spread":0.24244134270779738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2511066864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08448191,0.006808221,0.0029735896,0.15154602,0.0018527411,0.00015958496,0.00007745706,0.000025031919,0.75207543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8914263,0.0014070676,0.0008777511,0.018104296,0.00038774073,0.000105276544,0.000031601496,0.000028839366,0.087631166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9797213,0.0077462937,0.00040388553,0.0014532545,0.0045113335,0.006163916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908235,0.0059408844,0.00070354843,0.00038203923,0.0010344307,0.0011155972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017440278,0.00030899487,0.00042526957,0.0012753851,0.018943533,0.014496705,0.0016435495,0.0058960025,0.0058232574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015376831,0.0003554708,0.00034528313,0.0012964266,0.048175585,0.0034777548,0.008068534,0.007513901,0.0003025309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018772782,0.000020000607,0.00068535865,0.000034886765,0.0000031804636,0.0001364673,0.062621824,0.000106263404,0.0002575746,0.9160253,0.010984584,0.009105845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031453405,0.000043970238,0.005089102,0.0005325041,0.000014277973,0.000066520464,0.077746175,0.0001909013,0.00077046745,0.06772561,0.8477306,0.000058383688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.617558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7295127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.382442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04771477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.070212506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76938856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512219276","doi":"","title":"Medical Assistance in Dying and 'Suicide Tourism' to Canada: Bill C-14 from a Comparative Perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Bill of rights; Government (linguistics); Political science; Perspective (graphical); Assisted suicide; Human rights","score_opus":0.022273101884235154,"score_gpt":0.3165878005676636,"score_spread":0.29431469868342847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512219276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092061274,0.012049439,0.0008055044,0.11307677,0.00073697633,0.00005653625,0.0002935788,0.000021231952,0.7808987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91451424,0.0082228985,0.0006330378,0.03179791,0.00020636918,0.000072764706,0.00013936352,0.000034099383,0.044379268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924378,0.0014269059,0.00011412455,0.0002580125,0.002026511,0.0037366475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99599695,0.0014003534,0.00025256543,0.00013984789,0.0014235633,0.0007866516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033150732,0.00030934182,0.0004851232,0.0030244626,0.02797479,0.014589988,0.0023765585,0.005844594,0.0075346977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008760368,0.00024855573,0.00053626875,0.005130028,0.024544524,0.0030929807,0.0049756807,0.0074553345,0.00026376793],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001982392,0.000025261916,0.0019083676,0.00010257601,0.000009660448,0.00042501494,0.027664099,0.00021211557,0.00008827177,0.9404866,0.019339059,0.009719291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031431402,0.00006013689,0.0326454,0.0012436768,0.00008012225,0.00053015404,0.19645564,0.0004315905,0.00032092727,0.042702425,0.72536117,0.0001373818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9748888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13186294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13186294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18584804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95673704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512364812","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4678","title":"AN INTRODUCTION TO EXPLORING LAW, DISABILITY, AND THE CHALLENGE OF EQUALITY IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES: PAPERS FROM THE BERKELEY SYMPOSIUM","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.08863503913113079,"score_gpt":0.32989222137544344,"score_spread":0.24125718224431264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512364812","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017702081,0.5715897,0.00095322053,0.14811973,0.027294962,0.00007376349,0.0007336252,0.000096059135,0.2493687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07715857,0.5909325,0.0026618473,0.025624853,0.011882162,0.0002090375,0.00073434337,0.00027259003,0.29052424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963393,0.0005410706,0.00011391535,0.00024130926,0.0019761305,0.00078830187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995353,0.0009049201,0.00011810529,0.00015024119,0.0022436131,0.0012300881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028501211,0.0013961496,0.00080245506,0.0064258887,0.03068973,0.016932763,0.002072553,0.0044388934,0.0177693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004868653,0.00074546225,0.0007776794,0.011248385,0.012351197,0.005350316,0.004485511,0.0066220453,0.0020784324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007905206,0.000021216203,0.00022094302,0.00016376759,0.0000059923973,0.000061454506,0.005421846,0.000099182296,0.000056061628,0.066538066,0.9020651,0.025338346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016351937,0.0000023271907,0.00081058097,0.00061115,0.000004131113,0.000022633534,0.0040673898,0.000015352329,0.000029607883,0.0033207901,0.9910958,0.000018672354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9169094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96089846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10752473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10752473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13117704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7801502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512835946","doi":"10.29173/alr18","title":"Wigs, Skeletons, Bibs, Bands, and Bundles: An Albertan Barrister Deciphers the English Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Division (mathematics); Sociology; Criminal justice; European court of justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Business; European Union law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.022684148509780993,"score_gpt":0.3081267086105219,"score_spread":0.28544256010074087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512835946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16514902,0.15915543,0.0014522072,0.04423206,0.0012331,0.000061772116,0.00028868884,0.000060087405,0.6283676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8049499,0.06246859,0.0017605082,0.0084876325,0.0002597275,0.000018616533,0.00025113032,0.000072542505,0.121731356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977975,0.0005166081,0.00005372281,0.000113966584,0.0009880105,0.00053025543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838924,0.0004788302,0.00010266213,0.000063462794,0.0008041964,0.0001616008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003168826,0.00026989236,0.000305813,0.00398185,0.009732556,0.007574509,0.0014335642,0.0013311082,0.0039575873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004173275,0.00031181987,0.00016083264,0.0041805585,0.009070711,0.0019712679,0.0016889442,0.0019399251,0.00043230437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092404945,0.00004820569,0.012842399,0.0009905499,0.00005696602,0.0013619023,0.107193775,0.0009317193,0.0013278087,0.4091988,0.15687366,0.3090818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072049374,0.000024608416,0.052281674,0.0012905115,0.0000655774,0.0002546,0.07681497,0.00014674367,0.00035615498,0.009598896,0.8591166,0.00004241302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9707888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9707888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03805929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061304674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2761408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513256715","doi":"10.7202/1119728ar","title":"Constitutionalizing Women's Equality Rights: There is Always Room For Improvement","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitution; Constitutionalism; Humanities; Law; Democracy; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.18159398755495232,"score_gpt":0.4401749347296547,"score_spread":0.25858094717470237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513256715","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038107291,0.017815344,0.007415423,0.8995193,0.0031445806,0.000048627473,0.00011525814,0.00010951548,0.068021275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46255046,0.03316797,0.030483808,0.42473233,0.0052954135,0.00021563222,0.00032684993,0.0003981485,0.042829443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9459791,0.015745662,0.0013452247,0.0042194137,0.022511873,0.010198783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9323228,0.034685954,0.0018286163,0.005221658,0.01887931,0.0070617436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07356999,0.0010616821,0.0019075839,0.0029285317,0.022471562,0.025447764,0.0050936043,0.00933845,0.010967198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07860786,0.00059717597,0.0011727907,0.003180923,0.085242234,0.024172885,0.010253105,0.02521151,0.001220883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001831951,0.00002423559,0.00065498374,0.0002727313,0.000031507083,0.00006114002,0.0074177315,0.00024345104,0.00021764511,0.90524375,0.046517495,0.039296836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034218123,0.0000339817,0.0022212921,0.0017318738,0.000050993796,0.00007682369,0.020363897,0.00024298216,0.00052353024,0.36551896,0.609067,0.00013443844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7755926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82259274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7755926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.077992916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2042051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5658809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513322953","doi":"10.29173/alr372","title":"Covenant Marriage and the Conflict of Laws","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Subject-matter jurisdiction; State (computer science); Legislature; Declaration; Choice of law; Sociology; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.07688570775768638,"score_gpt":0.35070404262717914,"score_spread":0.27381833486949275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513322953","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013775341,0.7516423,0.0002944227,0.032233655,0.0006308138,0.000019554816,0.000021639902,0.000007419814,0.20137498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52191544,0.424152,0.00042783405,0.021537019,0.00091967196,0.00005251306,0.00007174803,0.000013592568,0.030910175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921177,0.003932999,0.0002345116,0.00042575225,0.0019160559,0.0013729892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938997,0.0032590497,0.0007320732,0.00013995686,0.0013171105,0.00065198366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070242197,0.00024541534,0.00058750913,0.0035458852,0.005938265,0.0053116283,0.0017484722,0.0037651276,0.0056068026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009009514,0.000284426,0.00035739184,0.0054521547,0.015542458,0.0025354335,0.0026469962,0.0033594575,0.0006017123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012393068,0.00007329395,0.0018244307,0.0005409223,0.000022258368,0.00037229905,0.0064253695,0.00027836167,0.00006446609,0.88757545,0.030838013,0.071972616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022843671,0.000055900935,0.01446032,0.004343757,0.000032674772,0.00039102984,0.014861557,0.00011040312,0.000075199474,0.083185345,0.88242525,0.00003567449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18812591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26481164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18812591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019646378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035457138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37406176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514979753","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199366989.003.0007","title":"Judicial Interviews of Children in Canada’s Family Courts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.054809493362080706,"score_gpt":0.25224733838624375,"score_spread":0.19743784502416303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2514979753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8877189,0.0049566007,0.00052773434,0.0071454495,0.00016083801,0.00013497667,0.0005384479,0.000021779955,0.098795325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780105,0.002709793,0.0006289981,0.0011778417,0.000024328005,0.00005243156,0.00016104056,0.000019245312,0.017215855],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99555236,0.0014774887,0.00013946257,0.0003279148,0.0011230563,0.0013796779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930086,0.0025092394,0.00076927734,0.00014942006,0.0020826522,0.00148068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041149952,0.00025059067,0.0004735177,0.0021864022,0.020504002,0.004340743,0.0018080325,0.001572692,0.006717912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009450072,0.00046335827,0.00018935904,0.0031613489,0.007626737,0.0010923418,0.0023623325,0.002704509,0.00041222927],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027965243,0.000040453328,0.015054198,0.000078102945,0.000005553939,0.003190547,0.9358136,0.00009447537,0.00083731,0.010697792,0.016476482,0.017683573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068600225,0.000023023353,0.032104727,0.00038372327,0.000008079998,0.0006598371,0.80222654,0.00009061939,0.0004024025,0.0006568097,0.16339788,0.00003940824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9316129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97967803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07138833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07138833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05700956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.517961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515145673","doi":"10.1086/518071","title":"<i>Awesome Families: The Promise of Healing Relationships in the International Churches of Christ</i>. By Kathleen E. Jenkins. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 2005. Pp. 283. $22.95.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Sociology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; State (computer science); Sociology; Library science; Media studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.032370217958947185,"score_gpt":0.2908158166519007,"score_spread":0.2584455986929535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515145673","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002527787,0.56555045,0.0006023959,0.31594476,0.012379155,0.00003070287,0.000075280135,0.000097800286,0.10279167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15125568,0.53987604,0.0022127768,0.06150443,0.014692898,0.00012491219,0.00014425072,0.00019467078,0.22999442],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993536,0.00039199396,0.00001258284,0.00003255729,0.000114077186,0.00009506078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991053,0.0004273325,0.00008308013,0.00004221393,0.000081555314,0.0002604566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014229409,0.0005795344,0.00036210215,0.0006566168,0.0036473314,0.0043748636,0.000844869,0.0025649362,0.022219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024316437,0.00036667398,0.0002604026,0.0007123113,0.006168521,0.007273478,0.0033279052,0.0038232615,0.0031313926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037615097,0.000019228792,0.00022018992,0.0003214131,0.00000846797,0.00013260049,0.0055810367,0.00003111954,0.00009113889,0.023963673,0.90214664,0.06744688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009156839,0.000021745076,0.0011867706,0.0011411968,0.000009508122,0.0004846985,0.014086042,0.00006666106,0.00008824007,0.02183559,0.9610552,0.000015064125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010279958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043413788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020439832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002130269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07432997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516069109","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.109-5313","title":"Birth control often not covered by Canadian insurers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Birth control; Supreme court; Health insurance; Control (management); Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Supreme Court Decisions; Business; Health care; Family planning; Medicine; Law; Political science; Computer science; Environmental health; Population","score_opus":0.008626831637923901,"score_gpt":0.2418798502073168,"score_spread":0.2332530185693929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516069109","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3296747,0.015018258,0.0014792009,0.17722565,0.0021783025,0.00020770122,0.0059194393,0.00013143249,0.46816534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8993022,0.008678138,0.0008507846,0.04949416,0.00048877834,0.00005942776,0.0014109773,0.00007234583,0.03964319],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950275,0.00027732295,0.00011352108,0.00043667303,0.0019034579,0.0022415877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939275,0.001022992,0.0009307829,0.000549668,0.002010167,0.0015588251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025286986,0.0001868212,0.0004676937,0.0016180512,0.010567018,0.0018551889,0.0013320271,0.0015979253,0.015236239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013650748,0.0002829023,0.0005499295,0.003061843,0.002199504,0.0010382695,0.001962317,0.0042095874,0.0006400601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029853545,0.00023524073,0.22554004,0.00041041817,0.00021755217,0.005098955,0.017470038,0.00019531662,0.0013857441,0.25303793,0.294089,0.20202123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011737867,0.00006656766,0.3619917,0.0020447958,0.00029604186,0.0055087786,0.022094522,0.0008506582,0.0011719976,0.014877735,0.5908147,0.00016509787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9610178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98242825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038982213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028254582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0446605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20500231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517375444","doi":"10.7202/1037165ar","title":"Faire basculer le climat de profilage social à Ottawa : le Programme de contestation des contraventions","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Reflets Revue d’intervention sociale et communautaire","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06834831655059878,"score_gpt":0.3618031001246399,"score_spread":0.2934547835740411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517375444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75499344,0.0024404428,0.0013479757,0.024503285,0.0002298636,0.00032041452,0.0011755605,0.000052330783,0.21493672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9518737,0.0007055556,0.00055372727,0.0006955855,0.000014029454,0.00007783167,0.00012986716,0.00002085713,0.04592879],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99666256,0.0005401225,0.000109928726,0.00032902297,0.00059947575,0.0017587926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957379,0.0008943493,0.00046939898,0.0003092839,0.00100791,0.0015811574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016007624,0.00033607747,0.0002759934,0.0016141658,0.013947603,0.007873454,0.0017680016,0.0017350262,0.008704219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038741762,0.00046322355,0.0003782443,0.0021023594,0.013937644,0.0024476955,0.005545282,0.0024437425,0.00050474977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020771586,0.00012264228,0.14129242,0.00061649387,0.000085088854,0.0017563783,0.41224214,0.0014323917,0.0018056971,0.36158583,0.022554567,0.056298677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028377244,0.00008909786,0.32540837,0.00074645143,0.000080803715,0.00034432497,0.32399994,0.00052504597,0.001027766,0.006813251,0.34073296,0.00020359688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96837753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09754816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09754816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.097378284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70776474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518125099","doi":"","title":"The Form and Substance of Aboriginal Rights: Assimilation, Recognition, Reconciliation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Treaty; Sovereignty; Indigenous rights; Political science; Law; Politics; Colonialism; Constitutional law; Sociology","score_opus":0.015765801893228414,"score_gpt":0.2910238731274726,"score_spread":0.2752580712342442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518125099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11043564,0.006042594,0.015307418,0.03834531,0.00034159058,0.00009959181,0.000043900687,0.00004929038,0.82933456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795675,0.0010730751,0.0020421527,0.0008817283,0.00007948969,0.000033122615,0.000015980797,0.000020790421,0.01628608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993822,0.0024190508,0.00013222925,0.0005854936,0.0016390908,0.0014021584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975885,0.00082813593,0.00018992745,0.00043482083,0.00062229694,0.0003362522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070577012,0.0002792873,0.00045894066,0.0011907757,0.014711096,0.011786404,0.0017929989,0.0026398706,0.0020040513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008017878,0.00026726435,0.00027145285,0.0015741806,0.08700277,0.006215284,0.0064569064,0.004260251,0.00021111943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037789941,0.0000038027315,0.00022201921,0.00001129977,0.0000014785521,0.000069650094,0.048219897,0.00005806445,0.000119698,0.94552755,0.00066700956,0.0050957273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013937567,0.000030093403,0.0042258142,0.0003236145,0.000021775892,0.00028438427,0.07869809,0.0005172741,0.0005281781,0.71166426,0.20364991,0.000042667627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5864259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5190488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5864259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033339944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045127157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83201945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519228174","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1327","title":"Judging the Limits of Cooperative Federalism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Constitution; Law; Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Originalism; Constitutional law; Political science; Meaning (existential); Separation of powers; Treaty; Constitutional economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07962996588047687,"score_gpt":0.3566823282573796,"score_spread":0.2770523623769027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519228174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07623178,0.005945892,0.006935927,0.06931259,0.00032587684,0.000048900012,0.00011894726,0.000052132185,0.84102803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98744047,0.0011030699,0.0014305877,0.003250155,0.00015138216,0.000045326466,0.0000330741,0.000028600078,0.0065173674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837323,0.0053204433,0.00047083406,0.0018448785,0.0049634073,0.003668129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9713093,0.016168566,0.0011200883,0.002205446,0.006912507,0.0022840379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01910235,0.00027770616,0.0007765353,0.0038887095,0.015397766,0.012160034,0.0026187345,0.0046005645,0.0049738754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054961562,0.00035636895,0.0004368994,0.0023019242,0.044205155,0.009647775,0.0055818283,0.005991423,0.00036490074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005866276,0.0000019742183,0.00035241843,0.000010821648,0.000003002207,0.000018206278,0.001981852,0.0001136631,0.000026362004,0.99393207,0.0017173899,0.0018361623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002270554,0.000012914262,0.0030457815,0.00023392124,0.000027022856,0.000045232202,0.008484097,0.0007831985,0.00017324004,0.88279074,0.10435489,0.000026201422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5238113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62733525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5238113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039830517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037118264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9579862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519708604","doi":"","title":"Justice that is Healing: Responding to Domestic Violence in Aboriginal Communities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UWSpace (University of Waterloo)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Restorative justice; Criminology; Economic Justice; Domestic violence; Political science; Psychology; Law; Medicine; Medical emergency; Suicide prevention; Poison control","score_opus":0.045348481866779915,"score_gpt":0.31732768999024724,"score_spread":0.2719792081234673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519708604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7377419,0.0052164667,0.0004955352,0.08162024,0.0011546811,0.00024902183,0.000035444664,0.000019336872,0.17346746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9604027,0.005593418,0.00052466354,0.0042759343,0.000111226254,0.00012998014,0.000019784185,0.00001873254,0.028923536],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959518,0.0028581158,0.000050392337,0.000105362524,0.0003264659,0.00070790667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99696463,0.000998565,0.00024044275,0.0000889897,0.00040827424,0.0012991086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004492064,0.0002624149,0.0003290592,0.00047203747,0.02146709,0.0053740107,0.0008973984,0.0021144806,0.0050266795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008027369,0.00021319572,0.00021563504,0.0006572476,0.008223702,0.0018525056,0.0043002353,0.005828262,0.0005504051],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015477774,0.00008882779,0.0018661207,0.000099632685,0.00000527263,0.00026519177,0.96368253,0.000021179467,0.00017121072,0.0064730295,0.009640133,0.017671403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026527098,0.000023308334,0.0029484562,0.00017442099,0.0000037794694,0.000057923964,0.97840023,0.000018439041,0.00005112508,0.0006117129,0.017704107,0.0000038600897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15129897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37141755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.848701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058867084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02102272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30083662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520057185","doi":"","title":"Do we have a right to assisted suicide","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eureka street","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Project commissioning; Kingdom; Assisted suicide; Publishing; Political science","score_opus":0.04912018951746322,"score_gpt":0.33785009229180474,"score_spread":0.2887299027743415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520057185","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006615686,0.010885367,0.0006642697,0.7743549,0.00785624,0.00001804137,0.00018394546,0.00004073424,0.19938084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3004163,0.01591968,0.00073699903,0.6029188,0.00631554,0.00008069337,0.00025049553,0.00007766972,0.0732838],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99394083,0.0021614053,0.0002314859,0.0005756188,0.0016699195,0.001420653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854116,0.005059916,0.0012467963,0.0014470118,0.002145694,0.0046889023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064416323,0.00023039203,0.00058133487,0.00061252195,0.0061696,0.0055318032,0.0011854143,0.008545518,0.040580895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039641798,0.000233692,0.00051172543,0.0004904129,0.01537382,0.010154146,0.0034840172,0.010524477,0.012568457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007912012,0.00013502032,0.003875816,0.00020961797,0.000036628884,0.00028755222,0.004379992,0.000058210582,0.00017795306,0.39134395,0.5205687,0.07884738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049215367,0.000056687393,0.002441934,0.00114072,0.000022597878,0.00076498656,0.005287763,0.000037576396,0.0001504922,0.16274114,0.8272642,0.000042610794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061814147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011395034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040580895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018770206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070232227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13575661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520191619","doi":"","title":"Stepping into Canada's Shoes: Tsilhqot'In, Grassy Narrows and the Division of Powers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Qualified immunity; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.006590381850983854,"score_gpt":0.25677871693873267,"score_spread":0.2501883350877488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520191619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33073246,0.0062213824,0.0021879235,0.09386805,0.0009405154,0.0001267338,0.0006395145,0.000110693305,0.5651727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83214825,0.0018213813,0.0013187544,0.02904464,0.00007930891,0.00003196764,0.00012165996,0.000050601015,0.13538353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963289,0.00019553043,0.000046923946,0.00027889112,0.0013065255,0.0018432549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850684,0.00027038855,0.00006024462,0.000059214424,0.0005984327,0.0005047637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015148536,0.0003289783,0.00033771404,0.00089527137,0.026523765,0.010328645,0.0016268626,0.003760698,0.0043039834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031611235,0.00053725205,0.0004673116,0.0012272723,0.012351738,0.0015718245,0.0027447322,0.006108727,0.00025367198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007815687,0.000038670758,0.011197666,0.00009944897,0.000034286015,0.0019309121,0.028344989,0.00096884934,0.001331058,0.8146274,0.112794615,0.02855388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071653914,0.00006889253,0.04654492,0.0005071251,0.000118245975,0.00039274115,0.0638049,0.0021954991,0.002259956,0.049142208,0.83453923,0.00035466894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.993764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99808735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09610441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09610441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19869007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6972896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521120568","doi":"","title":"Book Review ― Michael Plaxton, Implied Consent and Sexual Assault: Intimate Relationships, Autonomy, and Voice. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2015","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Autonomy; Queen (butterfly); Normative; Law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Sexual violence; Sociology; Medicine; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.01908635183959502,"score_gpt":0.2753849384565644,"score_spread":0.2562985866169694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521120568","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014104373,0.838473,0.00058790814,0.09506087,0.027165525,0.00004225308,0.00021875657,0.000028181428,0.038282424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038265362,0.84379447,0.000989022,0.06390489,0.023468927,0.000105178464,0.0002849721,0.00006401074,0.06356193],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675924,0.0008208681,0.00021959221,0.00022861082,0.0018446138,0.0001270649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98758465,0.0074449102,0.00067380397,0.00022987399,0.0037634382,0.00030342326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002840171,0.0007546196,0.001214085,0.0034234277,0.0015005963,0.0040149605,0.0020476242,0.0034740386,0.0202227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015267078,0.00046664831,0.0005418385,0.0061247083,0.0031126046,0.004031195,0.0013458796,0.0046188906,0.007525143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058496903,0.0000034444945,0.000029025656,0.0010233468,0.0000060194507,0.000037268434,0.00026135176,0.00003821351,0.000024590869,0.0069498043,0.9603581,0.03126295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023736516,0.0000039285483,0.00011921819,0.0016269054,0.0000050874355,0.000121222474,0.00010774072,0.000011622112,0.00001662555,0.001016795,0.9969618,0.0000065601903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043069422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08564796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043069422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075989515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014203679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08563745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523449894","doi":"","title":"The joint declaration, method, and the hermeneutics of ecumenical consensus : The joint Declaration of the Doctrine of Justification soteriological and ecclesiological implications","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of ecumenical studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Confessional; Proclamation; Faith; Ecumenism; Doctrine; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.20694622966378506,"score_gpt":0.4044791756667552,"score_spread":0.1975329460029701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523449894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050396767,0.014598104,0.30353242,0.1321995,0.0067435545,0.0006092308,0.00016398734,0.00031918884,0.49143738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8264132,0.001943227,0.10144079,0.008718192,0.0015780705,0.0016471393,0.00009878774,0.00024393256,0.05791666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92997354,0.056603424,0.0020643345,0.0029082005,0.0067937225,0.0016567307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.957048,0.02862085,0.0018694097,0.0071293768,0.0040192585,0.0013130313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06745114,0.000517464,0.00089076255,0.0024752496,0.008915373,0.014774339,0.0026240954,0.00583214,0.0039300816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.073340334,0.00057689403,0.000481219,0.0021406005,0.06815767,0.0117085045,0.011276122,0.0072784442,0.0008219962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011146556,0.0000061148953,0.0000914215,0.000040198214,0.0000025412155,0.00002703974,0.013708276,0.000092560826,0.00006843798,0.9747774,0.0025473488,0.008627384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028744915,0.000028029115,0.0003353928,0.00053308776,0.000008898299,0.0000872721,0.012001695,0.00086782186,0.00044036465,0.7768712,0.20875819,0.000039294922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004172897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043010274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06745114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008684323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019017618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35671997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524703956","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1436","title":"Lesbians, Gay Men, and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Charter; Heteronormativity; Heterosexuality; Gender studies; Homosexuality; Doctrine; Sociology; Political subjectivity; Politics; Law; Political science; Gay rights; Human sexuality; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02972727297493665,"score_gpt":0.2596051398160271,"score_spread":0.22987786684109046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524703956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099315025,0.018634196,0.0010467902,0.134353,0.0010906685,0.000064272506,0.00023149989,0.000062913095,0.74520177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87580705,0.00649223,0.00090955244,0.008526444,0.00017998347,0.00003040612,0.00007757961,0.000035171615,0.10794154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963457,0.0006313381,0.000048922837,0.00022509592,0.0013695016,0.0013795125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99682534,0.0003867655,0.00018037901,0.00010275501,0.001256659,0.0012481157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030726811,0.00038807737,0.00035263473,0.0022790516,0.03486195,0.009560677,0.001144885,0.0021180715,0.0077410345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048965896,0.00027307807,0.0001994874,0.0023392376,0.027674051,0.0028944872,0.0034292992,0.004513373,0.00033157214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000333265,0.00003008933,0.003664168,0.00004645749,0.0000061040755,0.00016765331,0.050765518,0.00015582034,0.00020013911,0.8587609,0.05834596,0.027823912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028155886,0.000022984703,0.01871275,0.00041567144,0.000020197433,0.00014454903,0.09296891,0.0002730843,0.00025646266,0.05656151,0.8304864,0.00010932517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9934716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99729186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10774191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10774191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16216654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7817259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2526262749","doi":"10.18566/escr.v24n52.a07","title":"MUNDO CERRADO, MUNDO ABIERTO LAS ESTRUCTURAS DEL PENSAMIENTO MODERNO SEGÚN CHARLES TAYLOR","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Escritos","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendence (philosophy); Secularity; Modernity; Immanence; The Imaginary; Reification (Marxism); Philosophy; Late modernity; Epistemology; Sociology; Humanities; Religious studies; Social science; Psychoanalysis; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.040023203401870155,"score_gpt":0.3028362919719272,"score_spread":0.26281308857005703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2526262749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06302075,0.18673144,0.016609734,0.31140915,0.007481073,0.0000526819,0.00014470876,0.00016008415,0.4143905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7669379,0.060835868,0.008560462,0.01424052,0.0025681052,0.00008045292,0.0000584595,0.00022958522,0.14648873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861,0.0006233953,0.00003509739,0.00019076615,0.00041753353,0.0001232446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986027,0.0008077399,0.00013067541,0.00007594041,0.00029533854,0.00008754586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018021069,0.00031537676,0.00030167235,0.0008166058,0.0041037253,0.005073982,0.00039959807,0.002141438,0.0014880182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027247209,0.0002547051,0.0001649855,0.001140983,0.0184201,0.004511825,0.0015094371,0.0037981095,0.0003829574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031445656,0.000011000253,0.00040015572,0.000081657454,0.0000042752686,0.000110180656,0.015450326,0.00027001536,0.0002182424,0.9345519,0.027635673,0.021235073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006651297,0.000012498532,0.0004954231,0.00029239696,0.000005865284,0.00017072825,0.004220738,0.00030340286,0.00040987565,0.17875502,0.8152984,0.00002912813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047628745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057203963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047628745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009057451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074355802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09470308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527490089","doi":"10.1017/cls.2016.18","title":"Lignes directrices facultatives en matière de pensions alimentaires pour époux – Pertinence de leur application au Québec?","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020221033900966353,"score_gpt":0.289382390083335,"score_spread":0.26916135618236864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527490089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9520237,0.0014118257,0.00067192846,0.003789574,0.000037802663,0.00004761754,0.00063993386,0.000012268153,0.041365378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97836566,0.0006295563,0.00037710954,0.00030572244,0.00001378745,0.00002034387,0.00018604026,0.000003686542,0.02009805],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991366,0.00014645289,0.000028206376,0.00008425785,0.00028116046,0.00032328983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966085,0.00046297754,0.00053523027,0.00013266096,0.0016191389,0.00064142555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014096919,0.0001658682,0.00019448316,0.0015800394,0.002780223,0.0018032478,0.0007821993,0.00044990066,0.012779276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045979167,0.000110549176,0.0002522305,0.0022070368,0.0014861086,0.0007346198,0.0013817468,0.00090682745,0.000469053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026223293,0.0001894676,0.7456994,0.00030713447,0.00014836593,0.0008027167,0.054385062,0.00118005,0.00254962,0.04083754,0.008588592,0.14504981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005638146,0.000046964506,0.9489409,0.000201041,0.00003613753,0.00009306096,0.023577958,0.00038034774,0.0004178251,0.0006946874,0.025586562,0.000018961102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91481787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96908486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08518213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017399583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014443453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17136753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527836442","doi":"","title":"The Function (or Malfunction) of Equity in the Charity Law of Canada's Federal Courts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Equity (law); Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Principal (computer security); Federal court; Law and economics; Economics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.025473556325641272,"score_gpt":0.30492819249337977,"score_spread":0.27945463616773847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527836442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22739258,0.0068723033,0.013396749,0.14989819,0.00048958824,0.00009320985,0.00017545132,0.00012454431,0.6015574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748828,0.00066240184,0.0009630027,0.007973639,0.00009872051,0.000019329727,0.000015376254,0.000013161253,0.015371673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902298,0.0015388556,0.00015815164,0.00083809905,0.002860796,0.0043743066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921591,0.0035630288,0.0004874444,0.00040254506,0.0022831846,0.0011047284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058342577,0.00023158349,0.00033572922,0.0013854812,0.022176301,0.015137159,0.0018415845,0.0044868914,0.0031069133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01747242,0.0005274063,0.00031120155,0.0019107151,0.029105883,0.0040133,0.0038084975,0.006169682,0.00018624583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047460526,0.0000038365674,0.0013069382,0.000010969482,0.000004322888,0.00006349791,0.002512469,0.00016838312,0.000068294125,0.9881202,0.0031432263,0.004593091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005907677,0.000043480537,0.022312945,0.00048035692,0.00009904769,0.00026854614,0.014532043,0.0034278363,0.001268346,0.6605177,0.29682624,0.00016430728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9634393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9755104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10390363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10390363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14208183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7538771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528066927","doi":"10.3138/9781442657151-004","title":"2. A.H.F. Lefroy: Common Law Thought in Late-Nineteenth-Century Canada – On Burying One’s Grandfather","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Law; Philosophy; Genealogy; Political science","score_opus":0.024764788651226867,"score_gpt":0.22559631994111717,"score_spread":0.2008315312898903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528066927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009511763,0.09308388,0.0028625017,0.093229406,0.0016272165,0.00007754336,0.0013022103,0.00013991215,0.79816556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17106348,0.03083165,0.002200479,0.015125783,0.0005181549,0.00006474759,0.00036795755,0.00020375804,0.77962404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993216,0.00006455932,0.000013115246,0.000058789556,0.00029514497,0.00024675578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992071,0.00022347634,0.000036790963,0.000021392976,0.00041240107,0.00009890625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006709928,0.0005231605,0.00033083424,0.00201322,0.01029531,0.004887715,0.0012589565,0.003835707,0.021461556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016003759,0.00045497835,0.00022817662,0.0031360148,0.008334963,0.0029609434,0.0014527929,0.00399559,0.0029674426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020341018,0.00001634852,0.0008623754,0.00013220946,0.000003899108,0.0003144078,0.018779496,0.00017089638,0.0001510369,0.5555713,0.3836289,0.040348753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050225813,0.00000414681,0.003518594,0.0002600654,0.000005242999,0.00014383928,0.0042983717,0.00012482404,0.00018833407,0.018079156,0.9733536,0.00001876985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9533339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98646927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046666086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026887115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039793275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19508064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528111427","doi":"10.3138/9781442683921-022","title":"Publications of the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; History","score_opus":0.04321427344463247,"score_gpt":0.2355772955384672,"score_spread":0.19236302209383474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528111427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014462398,0.040478162,0.00049207476,0.020478146,0.004793666,0.00007285217,0.0070220893,0.000259939,0.9249569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008511684,0.013646464,0.00056168676,0.00061106967,0.0003131079,0.000024985467,0.001398135,0.00014097773,0.97479194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775356,0.00011720294,0.00006129944,0.00018321905,0.0014816087,0.00040310688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961856,0.00032355613,0.000115579474,0.00027555524,0.0024440226,0.0006557344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015271003,0.0010042542,0.00075687916,0.0079265945,0.009689021,0.010614796,0.001350149,0.0019953991,0.19487827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047321296,0.00064467004,0.0003961926,0.013251019,0.0029285913,0.0030007372,0.0019766176,0.0023778656,0.020489942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007051823,0.000004484404,0.00017175656,0.00007613682,0.0000021532787,0.000027297085,0.0005422741,0.00003206738,0.000031991534,0.039718166,0.9271381,0.03224864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.255316e-7,5.3864517e-7,0.00052838586,0.00006051232,0.0000014554673,0.000011056209,0.00023322694,0.000014639416,0.00001731539,0.0010885198,0.9980394,0.000004082905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9456611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.981741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19487827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05118799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10851272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6519327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528186113","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1336","title":"Kahkewistahaw First Nation v. Taypotat: An Arbitrary Approach to Discrimination","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Commission; Political science; Focus (optics); Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.09264882175162263,"score_gpt":0.33085775457067607,"score_spread":0.23820893281905342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528186113","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070087135,0.0066358885,0.007092549,0.50264174,0.0049921973,0.00018890676,0.00020212152,0.000070532034,0.40808895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59784126,0.0017503191,0.0028864394,0.31363687,0.0007612087,0.0002273478,0.00006204571,0.00005699838,0.08277751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98880905,0.002565307,0.00043942322,0.0015661896,0.0030336718,0.0035863928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99480045,0.0024856871,0.0003308502,0.00030968687,0.0012412558,0.00083209603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007705073,0.00032186892,0.00040867922,0.0007139195,0.02405887,0.008578812,0.0022126092,0.019896263,0.002410004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011771885,0.0004892577,0.0005999754,0.00087282574,0.024444243,0.0042295265,0.0049167373,0.022869954,0.00037965065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002635398,0.000024965919,0.0015737979,0.000042871317,0.000009799029,0.00055363093,0.0264398,0.00015229148,0.0003466583,0.88026506,0.08314935,0.0074154586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006212476,0.000071862836,0.006330036,0.0006560744,0.000056493376,0.0007003988,0.029389309,0.0008723157,0.0012003463,0.17297924,0.7874636,0.00021817694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5064031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67668736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4935969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020477759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050844114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528615719","doi":"10.21991/c92q2k","title":"Kahkewistahaw First Nation v Taypotat – Whither Section 25 of the Charter?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Section (typography); Charter; Law; Plea; Jurisprudence; Respondent; Political science; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Sociology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.0325850467279558,"score_gpt":0.2637665648854747,"score_spread":0.23118151815751886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528615719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1519422,0.007298451,0.0043028025,0.30239362,0.003492327,0.00014933378,0.00036675914,0.00010366643,0.5299508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8079262,0.0015109116,0.0018558321,0.10991988,0.00037993808,0.00006313821,0.00009710046,0.00004791937,0.07819908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99352574,0.00087974704,0.00019859041,0.00074608816,0.001697564,0.0029522923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967415,0.0013712809,0.00022171975,0.00016475949,0.0009610024,0.0005397842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005493592,0.00022381934,0.00035148166,0.0007050547,0.014350385,0.010108154,0.0020315014,0.008228588,0.0032681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010811858,0.00032741102,0.00053317804,0.00090690056,0.009323282,0.0027620909,0.002032837,0.008121696,0.00046990035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027842423,0.000020563848,0.002496062,0.000037521353,0.000013506051,0.00074161537,0.011342117,0.00015769218,0.0005053696,0.9137734,0.06313846,0.0077458015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004721366,0.000067141846,0.015349464,0.00040727705,0.00009313707,0.0005302599,0.03669728,0.0008586504,0.0023751163,0.12899452,0.81434494,0.00023496123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74243975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8716579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25756025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024292842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04283623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51815414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529637341","doi":"10.3138/9781442685901-009","title":"6. Expedition Sailors: The Ombudsman in Newfoundland and Labrador","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Archaeology; History","score_opus":0.028224250752484813,"score_gpt":0.24399650254272884,"score_spread":0.21577225179024404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529637341","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09813953,0.026318327,0.00034501922,0.04381887,0.00245638,0.00008716001,0.0007110399,0.00009234897,0.8280313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11845986,0.0031789462,0.00023104443,0.0043379976,0.0000929861,0.00002636526,0.00013832127,0.00005749461,0.87347704],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916315,0.00008409592,0.000011669201,0.00005553002,0.00006611853,0.0006194101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965024,0.00004446729,0.000028466502,0.0000079713745,0.000061215054,0.00020764256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003855,0.000470802,0.00029383833,0.00083900575,0.028748358,0.0053826883,0.0011305269,0.003904256,0.03528891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006609329,0.0004607115,0.00024407475,0.0015307099,0.0044617094,0.0026938322,0.002687818,0.0045029474,0.0036453046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118598175,0.0001069683,0.011386972,0.0002750408,0.000014624954,0.003453567,0.16578293,0.0002094969,0.00044321278,0.07833253,0.66239256,0.077483505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038551634,0.000011766846,0.011718329,0.0002663639,0.0000053425583,0.00019441877,0.07403476,0.000024535815,0.00009400438,0.0004137171,0.91321397,0.00001901783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94312626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99497104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05687374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025104815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028102094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.182149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2539682818","doi":"10.1017/s0008423916000822","title":"Eliminating Indigenous Jurisdictions: Federalism, the Supreme Court of Canada, and Territorial Rationalities of Power","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Indigenous; Law; Sovereignty; Denial; Power (physics); Jurisdiction; Politics","score_opus":0.01859644538915065,"score_gpt":0.28004074913243465,"score_spread":0.261444303743284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2539682818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22385085,0.005120855,0.0049142204,0.06478785,0.0003674163,0.00007859199,0.00022668915,0.000052132735,0.70060146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98553675,0.0005790749,0.00058699923,0.0033801307,0.00007776914,0.00001676533,0.00002121278,0.000009872914,0.009791399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912429,0.0011966578,0.00017531356,0.000878323,0.003161363,0.0033453773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991507,0.003788938,0.0005254348,0.00038242183,0.0030135408,0.0007827059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005329553,0.00018538653,0.00048579858,0.0014995463,0.020736877,0.011545621,0.0021161656,0.004065499,0.0039740303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013805365,0.00029220406,0.00039533203,0.0019095277,0.02616919,0.0023303153,0.003044047,0.0064042546,0.00015848396],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006233154,0.0000043209407,0.00087595324,0.000012741635,0.0000069796833,0.0000973487,0.003564926,0.00026332523,0.0000786694,0.9892362,0.0036660074,0.002187199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009725316,0.000043693195,0.025947012,0.0007081518,0.0002031836,0.0002370813,0.026189832,0.0051407097,0.0013305442,0.612666,0.32720235,0.00023415749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9667591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9791812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083639525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.083639525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10817437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546484979","doi":"","title":"(Un)Chained Wives: Understanding the Bruker v. Markovitz Decision, and Possible Alternative Legal Claims for Jewish Women Who Are Denied a Get","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judaism; Law; Wife; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Sociology; Doctrine; Hebrew; State (computer science); Intervention (counseling); Political science; Psychology; Theology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04250719309193344,"score_gpt":0.33053769948494455,"score_spread":0.2880305063930111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2546484979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24573097,0.0033413472,0.012591096,0.13522121,0.00037977405,0.00010937868,0.00014063895,0.000048658523,0.6024369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9626368,0.00068073766,0.0011775814,0.01297742,0.00013357852,0.0000461107,0.000020127913,0.000014333336,0.022313204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998128,0.0006074392,0.00004168708,0.0002165253,0.00033475287,0.0006716766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983612,0.0010022413,0.00012250876,0.0000950046,0.00017120884,0.00024781367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003373685,0.00024377217,0.00030208274,0.0008257287,0.0097149145,0.0060317265,0.0014037082,0.0095861405,0.0060812565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007568396,0.00030790447,0.00048083294,0.0006398387,0.013457907,0.0037805154,0.0030801261,0.0063071405,0.00042644728],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013309312,0.0000062925183,0.00047743617,0.000003295659,0.0000020235245,0.00028931026,0.0016093968,0.00016376254,0.000046599514,0.99437153,0.0015739123,0.001443084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006832147,0.00004602266,0.0018948361,0.00015590407,0.000025545696,0.00038337387,0.008480211,0.0038656795,0.00037348774,0.92076284,0.06388263,0.00006118307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.113357365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19023678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88664263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077177673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074216602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22539508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546903642","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0027","title":"Marriage, Family, and Federal Concerns","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Legislature; Charter; Diversity (politics); Political science; Family law; Corporate governance; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.06425141144140507,"score_gpt":0.27970914010038944,"score_spread":0.21545772865898438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2546903642","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044252273,0.02458424,0.0008548634,0.02695724,0.0003676196,0.000018370481,0.00013998515,0.000026235117,0.9027992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9052939,0.008492457,0.00031377398,0.0026838537,0.00013320782,0.00001477688,0.0000657258,0.000014568859,0.08298764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896014,0.00023391274,0.000014460225,0.000106141466,0.00023147483,0.00045389083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996511,0.00007839251,0.000020939098,0.000025466808,0.00011113012,0.00011290482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095780805,0.00018728546,0.00022973724,0.0009708174,0.019094078,0.0042316117,0.0007578546,0.0011258171,0.010540558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013246338,0.000093989285,0.00017116843,0.001529503,0.015226661,0.0015882485,0.0015563974,0.0013965851,0.00031068543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041237045,0.000005321549,0.00055148016,0.000015214604,0.0000012716514,0.00006455667,0.012442427,0.00007171469,0.00004370473,0.96724,0.009863847,0.00969644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042485703,0.000011356153,0.00925445,0.00041492973,0.00001013159,0.00015528676,0.038790476,0.00020014678,0.00015581859,0.11707229,0.8339097,0.000021176911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9128245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94223785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9128245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04821743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03542515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34984356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547489690","doi":"","title":"\"This is What the Others Have Done\": The Impact of Confederation on the Use of Precedent in Newfoundland Supreme Court Decisions From 1932-1958","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Dominion; Jurisdiction; Dominance (genetics); Political science; Context (archaeology); Common law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.1572676411408118,"score_gpt":0.3686587613018798,"score_spread":0.211391120161068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547489690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8401964,0.0019757883,0.00018298236,0.022573145,0.00018806629,0.000033824548,0.00016667058,0.0000137132365,0.13466933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831581,0.0004905604,0.000064962944,0.00348726,0.00002632549,0.000012474919,0.00005687423,0.000007751055,0.012695519],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99351305,0.0011509404,0.00015636993,0.0005399346,0.0010896309,0.0035501362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98780406,0.0057967436,0.0011049683,0.0003125135,0.0030623595,0.0019192691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004442477,0.00016516053,0.0002902004,0.0012357362,0.030729605,0.008890683,0.0019163286,0.0026315127,0.0033638538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017178906,0.00036754785,0.00033698414,0.001458916,0.0115881665,0.002527662,0.0030594624,0.004586739,0.00028705242],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045078716,0.00034626198,0.19252239,0.00017976602,0.00020009074,0.010446732,0.4937922,0.002665918,0.0022426578,0.1356955,0.08415562,0.077302136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004274188,0.00015370747,0.4563644,0.00069826836,0.00014334505,0.0005295153,0.3173318,0.00046765094,0.0018331639,0.0035344276,0.218643,0.00025815968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9729231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09429384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09429384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041892175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6841529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547561371","doi":"","title":"\"Scholarship as Activism\" Chapter 29 in The Unbounded Level of the Mind: Rod MacDonald's Legal Imagination","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Scholarship; Tribute; Honour; Sociology; Economic Justice; Legal realism; Legal profession; Political science","score_opus":0.15645726231075113,"score_gpt":0.3817604113735115,"score_spread":0.2253031490627604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547561371","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008433471,0.070647724,0.0010594344,0.6395688,0.012535541,0.00004054381,0.00007822615,0.00007219862,0.2675641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4492087,0.057634473,0.0017618227,0.1451443,0.012110684,0.00023077047,0.00012032973,0.00029966654,0.33348924],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969984,0.0013861138,0.00005166517,0.00021106572,0.0007659857,0.00058672775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950724,0.0021624817,0.00019228412,0.00018901295,0.0010682304,0.0013155557],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026852821,0.0005878329,0.00041625334,0.0013214691,0.01912376,0.016484672,0.0019709922,0.004745639,0.003812045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067666066,0.00023504325,0.00026054762,0.0016208143,0.029224116,0.0050912993,0.004531298,0.008016149,0.0006391823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013565504,0.000024394607,0.00019063405,0.000073904295,0.0000027174794,0.00013620447,0.037122086,0.00008681355,0.000130056,0.42890665,0.52126825,0.012044696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045876245,0.0000054340326,0.00030900387,0.000412679,0.000002471722,0.00004306501,0.019513877,0.0000590891,0.00006638657,0.029787157,0.94978476,0.000011485354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40395626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54403406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98087627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035601817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03836584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80320996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550870894","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2008.2816","title":"A Review of Lorraine Daston and Peter Galison’s Objectivity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Qualitative Report","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Subjectivity; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.23056065128497955,"score_gpt":0.5547263561167955,"score_spread":0.324165704831816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550870894","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004426294,0.9935789,0.00018648496,0.00428373,0.00068537774,0.000006491749,0.000008343667,0.0000021121139,0.0012042626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010888198,0.993764,0.00033271447,0.0033426334,0.00077160524,0.000027667738,0.00001804515,0.000006221279,0.0006482008],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992316,0.0036745814,0.0011007639,0.00048628164,0.00220339,0.00021902633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9649084,0.028866956,0.001678327,0.0005562983,0.0036105588,0.000379466],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012146751,0.0011380066,0.002162214,0.0101798,0.0015488495,0.0055732327,0.001484034,0.0032504823,0.0034079445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028911455,0.0008639523,0.0009998779,0.014352503,0.005816016,0.008410198,0.003150494,0.004758679,0.0012873447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007306253,0.0000602576,0.0005099388,0.0770191,0.00020821896,0.00035890684,0.0067841345,0.00025893727,0.0004652979,0.11252195,0.25682047,0.5449197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008783792,0.000025032527,0.00044291734,0.043851864,0.000048199396,0.00030619072,0.0007348872,0.00002042322,0.00009814231,0.011523861,0.94291323,0.0000264463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055377404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008418827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9984512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042959847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010334212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064238966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W255101955","doi":"","title":"Sermon: Grasping the Past, Taking Hold of the Future: The Challenge of Afro-Anglicanism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sermon; Sociology; Law; Theology; History; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.06053509555936397,"score_gpt":0.3445565905599208,"score_spread":0.2840214950005568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W255101955","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10479982,0.12449939,0.0011444307,0.49835467,0.017941954,0.00003543025,0.000064516724,0.0001106035,0.25304914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80307096,0.033831198,0.0008272855,0.060711943,0.005927092,0.000042746546,0.000048161575,0.00013650184,0.09540413],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995993,0.0028145292,0.00005739033,0.00017146175,0.00025957025,0.000704127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967578,0.0010803374,0.00019977184,0.00010515597,0.0004989928,0.0013580625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005859608,0.0006267632,0.00044912705,0.0006524129,0.030218514,0.012940405,0.0008885696,0.00380373,0.008659293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044653183,0.00047131878,0.00025731858,0.0004815159,0.017011827,0.0075383135,0.0038924187,0.008198597,0.0018153699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007338503,0.00005626459,0.0015144378,0.00026255214,0.000012559465,0.0016849096,0.5730832,0.000054135304,0.000240405,0.11783886,0.2716479,0.033531412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006907293,0.00003232288,0.0010224599,0.0006213639,0.0000069179005,0.00064279954,0.5789853,0.00006237117,0.000106759515,0.009163983,0.40932408,0.000024710671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028518055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07743028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030218514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005124643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065132696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056704104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553314130","doi":"10.4000/eccs.712","title":"La morale à l’épreuve de la mondialisation : le rôle des valeurs morales et familiales dans la distinction idéologique du Canada en Amérique du Nord","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Études canadiennes / Canadian Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037162342470296365,"score_gpt":0.2796458982234736,"score_spread":0.2424835557531772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553314130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57018226,0.008806197,0.0044537904,0.05597045,0.000347892,0.000029164188,0.00016956453,0.000031895648,0.36000875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99010533,0.0008516746,0.0005022403,0.00041777553,0.000017177215,0.0000065949903,0.00001251125,0.000009251913,0.008077397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997584,0.0008435609,0.000030425485,0.0001727745,0.0005616594,0.00080760726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99710256,0.0007930213,0.00026546928,0.00016152218,0.0008362816,0.00084117084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027163248,0.0002675851,0.0002203959,0.0012639704,0.010278531,0.007115837,0.00091971975,0.0011317106,0.00417431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041896203,0.00015616228,0.0002187604,0.0016837536,0.021926334,0.0025816187,0.0027347773,0.0024043818,0.00014170141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006711918,0.00002616348,0.02156471,0.000077299985,0.000020311165,0.00024678645,0.15844262,0.00029997394,0.00044214883,0.7907277,0.004304578,0.023780616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044423658,0.000046210702,0.11846774,0.0007590091,0.000056524877,0.00040973944,0.36896634,0.0011404284,0.00074351585,0.10213805,0.4070931,0.00013482862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89426744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.939899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10573256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045654725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0668127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33124977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553331921","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4683","title":"MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE:  RELATIONAL AUTONOMY AND DECISION-MAKING BY ADULTS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Psychology; Volition (linguistics); Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Individualism; Political science","score_opus":0.04227486848726325,"score_gpt":0.3394451055679871,"score_spread":0.2971702370807239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553331921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98478967,0.0015705526,0.00026712587,0.0045455093,0.00001713597,0.000015440748,0.000027982203,0.0000023529547,0.008764197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984479,0.0006325468,0.00012503481,0.0002945682,0.000007740148,0.000012093592,0.000009054383,0.0000011460355,0.00046976525],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978655,0.0011823466,0.00012187266,0.00021589296,0.0002768485,0.00033753438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99653244,0.00195104,0.0007440049,0.0001275586,0.00020433479,0.00044059817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024005577,0.00019781417,0.00026221882,0.00072452123,0.0040393723,0.003476679,0.0005398037,0.00087873207,0.0015296246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072213844,0.00015231816,0.00023232614,0.0006783844,0.0067285416,0.003703095,0.004096969,0.0016761124,0.000081316146],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016182248,0.000043942084,0.02813883,0.000037363505,0.000003995274,0.00063713704,0.9541453,0.000024979512,0.00017182624,0.0053560655,0.0004741646,0.010950267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004810225,0.000029336157,0.032411132,0.00010901721,0.000006444261,0.00063616445,0.9575172,0.000059663627,0.000104275045,0.0021297047,0.006980562,0.000011704961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036714476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05633912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036714476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032818974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032437334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073001504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W255699776","doi":"","title":"THE \"SUPREMACY OF GOD\", HUMAN DIGNITY AND THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Law; Charter; Political science; Human rights; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology","score_opus":0.011160441390085415,"score_gpt":0.27964289022952954,"score_spread":0.2684824488394441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W255699776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04610492,0.0319782,0.018589912,0.2109259,0.0023833897,0.00006747321,0.00012371945,0.0000960681,0.68973047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9294106,0.006984562,0.0043178503,0.013422605,0.000741051,0.000046044795,0.00003905647,0.00004134153,0.044996865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953485,0.0016959694,0.00008607124,0.0004012218,0.0014944421,0.0009737935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978071,0.0010128247,0.00019141445,0.00017102377,0.00046042915,0.00035728578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004184109,0.0003984388,0.0004684446,0.0011662563,0.009563495,0.01078031,0.0013951854,0.0037998687,0.0022715242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004849456,0.00018029187,0.00026319968,0.0010009072,0.0851935,0.0059814127,0.0038030325,0.0074736904,0.00025010377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018365873,0.0000012710705,0.00003273373,0.000007253038,3.6252393e-7,0.000012695545,0.0014327713,0.000029569474,0.000018750314,0.99467385,0.002142783,0.0016461243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012364647,0.000021369817,0.000781118,0.00023367605,0.000005864377,0.000069927075,0.0055547785,0.00028434128,0.00023918146,0.76976967,0.22300175,0.0000259567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26851538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3379642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73148465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02072361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02862065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5339049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557614419","doi":"10.5209/rpub.53879","title":"Contractarian Libertarianism of Jan Narveson. Is It Still Libertarianism?","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Libertarianism; Social contract; Law and economics; Philosophy; Subject (documents); Morality; Political philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.021814354961587516,"score_gpt":0.3120924097632771,"score_spread":0.2902780548016896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557614419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030999206,0.05316575,0.018777087,0.3555267,0.003844096,0.00007306334,0.00013640037,0.00007534512,0.53740233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7947555,0.021406021,0.007628956,0.05069299,0.001878237,0.00013181221,0.000098074066,0.00015391872,0.12325448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710125,0.0010401245,0.00007196226,0.0005532521,0.0010314619,0.00020197933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986707,0.00059924345,0.000119317585,0.000107774205,0.00038468486,0.00011830474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003499542,0.00031761112,0.00045602955,0.00056808186,0.0057669985,0.0055637457,0.0009043304,0.0025686547,0.0029398943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004979351,0.00025817423,0.00029061682,0.00088465307,0.016342059,0.005562234,0.0018341839,0.005767783,0.0005949107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007588041,0.0000071623767,0.00009555767,0.0000168402,0.000001502933,0.000021546915,0.0014466937,0.000081014245,0.000039986644,0.9878423,0.008121192,0.0023185497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008566758,0.0000129035325,0.00053578406,0.00016440365,0.000004244632,0.00010104255,0.0017960174,0.00052997016,0.00017835657,0.6472049,0.34943825,0.00002561445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045897868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040848732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045897868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010056526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008011884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09126145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560432532","doi":"","title":"Devolution, Evolution, Confusion: the Constitutional Status of the Canadian Territories and its Potential Implications for the Duty to Consult","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confusion; Devolution (biology); Duty; Law; Political science; Operations research; History; Psychology; Mathematics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02392565925271303,"score_gpt":0.2796583328803652,"score_spread":0.2557326736276522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560432532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40066797,0.007212014,0.0020227546,0.12531734,0.00029653238,0.00006659846,0.00038893745,0.00002533227,0.46400252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854438,0.00094996125,0.00050661043,0.0022704965,0.0000407832,0.000017003498,0.000033507666,0.000015129052,0.010722638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925156,0.0015522295,0.0001508152,0.0007471632,0.0018050855,0.0032290798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99136305,0.0028788121,0.00057701353,0.0005102374,0.0030601034,0.0016107121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074736667,0.00024397121,0.0004937605,0.0031640292,0.030012023,0.01671586,0.0030588096,0.0040859855,0.0068365703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016772076,0.0003548664,0.0004194819,0.0062226662,0.04993321,0.0056360317,0.0057208785,0.004410124,0.00018381559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024785102,0.000012609567,0.0037193508,0.000029974364,0.000008485767,0.00009928281,0.035611104,0.00019857386,0.00015876109,0.9422707,0.0042477697,0.013618632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057643334,0.000032154905,0.07724061,0.0007392586,0.00009126196,0.00026304042,0.23050113,0.0014303715,0.00058653456,0.27137604,0.41741437,0.00026754785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98848873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1318607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1318607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21970971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9567208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561254362","doi":"10.14288/1.0308596","title":"Beyond the new Dawes Act : a critique of the First Nations Property Ownership Act","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Business; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.018473579137904882,"score_gpt":0.22372173051843686,"score_spread":0.20524815138053198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561254362","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018383509,0.038204722,0.00727489,0.44851926,0.003135195,0.00005167855,0.00015045721,0.000063311716,0.484217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7157477,0.017446883,0.0050533046,0.1295043,0.003047861,0.00018918194,0.0000937084,0.00018080173,0.1287363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863942,0.0036596248,0.00032961462,0.001659741,0.006336177,0.0016206725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991033,0.006058782,0.0004028831,0.00041752702,0.0016423097,0.00044549868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010889471,0.0006801186,0.0007366268,0.0024355634,0.013435699,0.012912015,0.003383227,0.013328903,0.00287183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015143197,0.00048917,0.0006563854,0.0020416677,0.06484518,0.010748377,0.003934379,0.019982036,0.00047513412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033255649,0.0000029135565,0.00006815042,0.00001363406,0.0000012539178,0.000040874907,0.004742344,0.00007847836,0.000015748943,0.98742795,0.006114425,0.0014909416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013674238,0.000008098852,0.00061245245,0.00044386514,0.000007739034,0.00008294308,0.0047838017,0.00059003825,0.00016753956,0.27158177,0.7216599,0.000048252772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62806207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57418364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37193793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059992436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05630122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7482567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562854184","doi":"10.21991/c9z08p","title":"Daniels v Canada: Supreme Court Ends 150 Years of Political Football","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitution; Parliament; Politics; Plaintiff; Settlement (finance); Interpretation (philosophy); Political question; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.025839907581089023,"score_gpt":0.27802250632928044,"score_spread":0.25218259874819143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562854184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10985085,0.0066034254,0.0011365187,0.09320146,0.0019901625,0.00017378687,0.0020162466,0.00016354704,0.7848639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57456535,0.0029465402,0.00092455815,0.07232399,0.0004999401,0.00009604645,0.0006177782,0.000091896814,0.34793383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98961407,0.00046152473,0.00017790656,0.0009910547,0.0043143113,0.0044411393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957098,0.0010610615,0.00011297576,0.00019216798,0.0019080429,0.001015862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037493797,0.00047959198,0.00063682365,0.0018298642,0.041662667,0.011433518,0.0027813294,0.010813087,0.009421957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010826789,0.0007172402,0.0006917801,0.002301278,0.0063219657,0.0018539018,0.003389023,0.009583393,0.00087688526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014453988,0.0000511609,0.006903703,0.00011363029,0.000055412533,0.0026094185,0.01241381,0.0005883335,0.001152428,0.64903855,0.30659732,0.020331662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009355484,0.00006321067,0.015893633,0.00046181944,0.00010857851,0.00038679896,0.012196192,0.000856729,0.0019286147,0.029640375,0.9381163,0.0002541884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98471594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084343895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.084343895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1521507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61196065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563036451","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x16001587","title":"General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Synod; Session (web analytics); Work (physics); Theology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Advertising; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.018217243934284498,"score_gpt":0.2709534100097946,"score_spread":0.25273616607551014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2563036451","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044537604,0.02180562,0.0008544555,0.061857373,0.014939343,0.00046215332,0.0068164915,0.00027650016,0.8484505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15549022,0.0073469556,0.00078251236,0.0123789245,0.0012338092,0.00012846572,0.0016369722,0.00022526705,0.8207769],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991172,0.00009021261,0.000023366401,0.00012912443,0.0003352422,0.00030485808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704033,0.0000772821,0.00006149602,0.00008410264,0.0013833315,0.0013534739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000978855,0.00029635185,0.0003392554,0.0010702386,0.013882358,0.0027960115,0.000724214,0.0012189518,0.06413947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015589374,0.00029272184,0.00012344788,0.0012803124,0.0011544852,0.0008401986,0.0020553537,0.0017327318,0.0051698275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005095813,0.000021760594,0.0019440756,0.00011413148,0.0000031781806,0.0002045097,0.0027073624,0.000034774195,0.0010069258,0.0098087555,0.95902085,0.025082836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029358284,0.000004419204,0.003691926,0.000054097865,7.650223e-7,0.00004716273,0.0022764532,0.000011214348,0.000075208365,0.000095505486,0.99373204,0.000008298773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8285544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9498385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17144561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020101137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032526527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34491056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565696674","doi":"","title":"Les Droits De La Personne Et Le Litige En Protection De L’Enfance (Human Rights in Child and Youth Protection Litigation)","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Context (archaeology); Jurisprudence; Ethnology; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.012834191706529274,"score_gpt":0.2889128923581455,"score_spread":0.2760787006516162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565696674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24771081,0.017743737,0.0036360044,0.05819552,0.00053005916,0.00011536699,0.00054324116,0.00006599222,0.67145926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9046061,0.002753559,0.00042693186,0.0031151602,0.00011035169,0.000052104326,0.00006800794,0.000016238284,0.08885153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973545,0.00083876436,0.000064309585,0.00024094843,0.00061195536,0.0008894885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998264,0.00069853675,0.00018360934,0.00007071166,0.0006041253,0.00017900846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021112051,0.0002970259,0.00026454512,0.0012264122,0.00967515,0.0063214265,0.0009243587,0.0032379248,0.011462426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035459558,0.00016852898,0.00027602733,0.0011869362,0.008776291,0.0014999355,0.0023944506,0.0029743677,0.00058395293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031259093,0.000032945416,0.006640208,0.00014492059,0.000018197377,0.00146672,0.05844206,0.00047771714,0.0005134471,0.8724063,0.036980256,0.022845967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033953347,0.00008806921,0.08870364,0.0016419503,0.000085741594,0.001319085,0.10637971,0.0014718206,0.002337054,0.058005918,0.7397976,0.00013541932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8227355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.857016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8227355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029119093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0234554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35661685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565975243","doi":"","title":"Le Juge Charles Doherty Gonthier et la Tradition Classique du Droit Naturel: Correspondances (TR. Justice Gonthier and the Classical Natural Law Tradition: Some Points of Correspondence)","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Natural law; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.011471558125676401,"score_gpt":0.26896109705143223,"score_spread":0.2574895389257558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565975243","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007077158,0.16697827,0.00196533,0.73034036,0.0070001753,0.00001859965,0.00009328997,0.00002487672,0.086501986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4567849,0.13840143,0.0055973628,0.22306174,0.02597778,0.00016532752,0.00008562192,0.00030057353,0.14962521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962155,0.0018055644,0.00008842997,0.0006184303,0.0009736547,0.00029829098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958961,0.002808909,0.00032739202,0.00021770898,0.0005299476,0.00021988867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004183696,0.00046750915,0.00068341475,0.0023112714,0.008061663,0.007463624,0.0014401719,0.0076508066,0.0047375155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00929541,0.00051613303,0.00031255026,0.0045556226,0.021626556,0.0070909914,0.0031905926,0.009608604,0.00061380904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001318241,0.00001223678,0.0003342639,0.00005526603,0.0000063096927,0.0000639634,0.0060177976,0.00007370727,0.000038213017,0.87442297,0.10986359,0.009098457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001878393,0.000010414806,0.0015812768,0.0003705805,0.000006868212,0.00013129732,0.0041010915,0.00017293206,0.00009591757,0.35504147,0.63842624,0.000043246135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11392617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16280113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11392617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008523565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063231727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22652608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566452130","doi":"10.21991/c9g09q","title":"Trinity Western Law School: \"To Be or Not to Be -- That Is the Question\"","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Law; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Nova scotia; Balance (ability); Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.08022226476180438,"score_gpt":0.35196583245039137,"score_spread":0.271743567688587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566452130","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033363525,0.004680174,0.0013763872,0.525854,0.003584494,0.000035376688,0.00011513319,0.000066543165,0.43092427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6097651,0.001571849,0.001150219,0.13213125,0.00061799533,0.000065042244,0.00009381352,0.00009744184,0.2545073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591523,0.0013855529,0.000102151986,0.00055778516,0.00080275,0.0012365332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967841,0.0007257137,0.00019062537,0.00017331,0.00089522445,0.0012310358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003858302,0.00021881756,0.0002790739,0.00063426176,0.016284319,0.0084426,0.000870406,0.0055977097,0.012525378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071676867,0.00024192793,0.00016734784,0.00075980264,0.025579382,0.0047307415,0.003182532,0.00813491,0.0023473005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014569902,0.000013360266,0.0021591028,0.000056484645,0.0000049836185,0.0001701273,0.03546139,0.00001994944,0.00013728197,0.7008062,0.24688451,0.014272086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008221007,0.000014417149,0.004077888,0.00030327824,0.000008223156,0.00014101717,0.048890017,0.00006389916,0.00021701476,0.0698072,0.8764337,0.000034999866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38743767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.646982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6125623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01614173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023415528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77036506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566974742","doi":"","title":"The Obsolete Theory of Crown Unity in Canada and Its Relevance to Indigenous Claims","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Natural resource; Independence (probability theory); Supreme court; Law; Natural (archaeology); Political science; Constitution; Sociology; History; Archaeology; Ecology","score_opus":0.029949603338706117,"score_gpt":0.2755112166048056,"score_spread":0.2455616132660995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566974742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1570692,0.014158093,0.009892651,0.11293351,0.0005953005,0.000050227314,0.00013267883,0.000046986792,0.7051214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856726,0.0020014737,0.00092120696,0.0029731847,0.00010022511,0.000010861599,0.000012969368,0.000010745773,0.008296815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99388367,0.0009582631,0.000119718876,0.00063001533,0.0026392064,0.0017690731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960836,0.0014384547,0.0003051758,0.00023777071,0.0014003859,0.0005346781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047787204,0.00032390986,0.00045277746,0.0020243987,0.028432675,0.011040789,0.0028221272,0.004450348,0.0029747495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009417179,0.00025281048,0.000390323,0.0030706322,0.068056114,0.004646579,0.0051331953,0.0071073123,0.00016275115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002974722,0.000003140531,0.0004740627,0.0000126794985,0.0000019141921,0.00007290475,0.0075509804,0.0001501431,0.000028900198,0.9875065,0.0012407557,0.0029549582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002368193,0.000022046655,0.010693066,0.00057219947,0.000048240923,0.00025708048,0.04390393,0.002431661,0.00043477077,0.7638683,0.17762707,0.0001180717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9757161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98240006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10865192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10865192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13795017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7883285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567411418","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1324","title":"The Past and Future of Constitutional Law and Social Justice: Majestic or Substantive Equality?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Retrenchment; Constitutional law; Law; Political science; Charter; Equal Protection Clause; Substantive law; Economic Justice; Inequality; Law and economics; Constitutional right; Sociology; Constitution; Public administration","score_opus":0.08895260459985463,"score_gpt":0.37339594091850237,"score_spread":0.2844433363186477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567411418","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012629908,0.31040153,0.009107967,0.53521997,0.002512291,0.000019016288,0.00005981569,0.000034714474,0.13001484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80694145,0.1266063,0.005554898,0.045941204,0.005864563,0.00007280595,0.00005271539,0.00004215297,0.008923964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834803,0.0094734905,0.0005369056,0.0014847812,0.0033463684,0.0016780876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770225,0.016205277,0.00156138,0.0018740599,0.0020145334,0.0013221703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02228868,0.00031179193,0.0010871503,0.0026133757,0.009200403,0.016379485,0.0024427336,0.0058567505,0.00392877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023049567,0.00036927126,0.00049592793,0.0031916378,0.10060165,0.018862925,0.0065739364,0.0111761335,0.00036721636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031518873,0.000004482205,0.00011414291,0.000079413,0.0000037409782,0.000019484225,0.0010453132,0.00004430364,0.000021436123,0.99027246,0.001385467,0.007006623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010930319,0.000018838695,0.0008343146,0.0008792572,0.000009083616,0.00005578523,0.003615621,0.00014529614,0.00005891021,0.88895136,0.10539591,0.000024785964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057523817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06877484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057523817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018655205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030773414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13535362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W257036210","doi":"","title":"Justice Bastarache, the Charter and Judging: Principled Pragmatism and the Centrality of Equality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Economic Justice; Political science; Centrality; Pragmatism; Human rights; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05154791915603733,"score_gpt":0.3148542736741043,"score_spread":0.26330635451806694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W257036210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10614655,0.016901407,0.028788269,0.38330972,0.0021662554,0.00008979979,0.000048813985,0.000094891264,0.46245438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96113473,0.0010385867,0.0046292455,0.015117605,0.00027442235,0.000039332866,0.0000076213164,0.000033694556,0.017724754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883571,0.0067088935,0.00027406827,0.0010455704,0.0021715234,0.0014428472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937644,0.0041490407,0.00038933867,0.0004170717,0.00090989226,0.00037017767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01056635,0.0002503729,0.00048036294,0.00092883117,0.015703134,0.009213382,0.0014308636,0.008236312,0.0015935381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017048897,0.00026193497,0.00032249768,0.0008478052,0.045562506,0.0067212256,0.0040755165,0.010389795,0.00025197642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007426434,0.0000051434345,0.000121406425,0.000017790742,0.000001744475,0.00006893005,0.013084431,0.000057979913,0.000070183276,0.9770495,0.0053470684,0.0041683814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015421856,0.000041110638,0.00088640035,0.00022445101,0.000008154804,0.0002926006,0.012593202,0.00054303237,0.00048041943,0.8346859,0.15018389,0.000045384713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024371527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03203637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9756285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062045897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00819343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055880904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2570652814","doi":"","title":"Importing U.S. Establishment Clause Principles in Canada: Changing the Debate on Funding for Faith-based Schools in Ontario","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Faith; Political science; Establishment Clause; Public administration; Law; First amendment; Theology; Supreme court; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0469617219585506,"score_gpt":0.28494463036827067,"score_spread":0.23798290840972008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2570652814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29776883,0.010728476,0.0020756181,0.29255596,0.0010850189,0.00023817898,0.0008747358,0.00007430512,0.39459884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90994614,0.0050321147,0.0017397042,0.022844967,0.00015527211,0.0000649473,0.0001858043,0.00004394227,0.0599871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914172,0.000948137,0.00023377145,0.0005149998,0.0030893786,0.0037964727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832857,0.0045162896,0.0007944158,0.00045450532,0.0070613525,0.003887748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006332071,0.000244786,0.00040366198,0.0015172448,0.030358978,0.010633848,0.0022164255,0.004340908,0.0044143694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01524283,0.00059129595,0.00040172492,0.0032182564,0.010854662,0.0023980367,0.0030718602,0.005183282,0.00023177567],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011585017,0.00005276995,0.02582194,0.00027203423,0.000039332714,0.00091062667,0.053717468,0.001477635,0.00094728224,0.77001286,0.109313935,0.037318304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011739522,0.00006762883,0.06983938,0.00089282787,0.00014331969,0.00017983654,0.061179202,0.0018469645,0.001151561,0.021734223,0.84264725,0.00020039825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9984413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31686077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.31686077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4665255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7923447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2571774476","doi":"","title":"Marriage and Advance Consent to Sex: A Feminist Judgment in R v JA","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Supreme court; Harm; Tribunal; Law; Sexual violence; Political science; Human sexuality; Context (archaeology); Sexual assault; Criminal code; Sociology; Criminal law; Criminology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; History","score_opus":0.017616404578270756,"score_gpt":0.30972588648256766,"score_spread":0.2921094819042969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2571774476","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06913364,0.012261951,0.0073787356,0.5265915,0.0040690666,0.00017917095,0.00012618616,0.000049013175,0.38021073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76453894,0.0035435997,0.0027424225,0.14242347,0.0017863308,0.00010817216,0.00003568701,0.00005330875,0.08476797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853554,0.006614132,0.00059515244,0.0015658538,0.002837988,0.0030314352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917605,0.0060114423,0.00025612093,0.0002478369,0.0009860212,0.0007381215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01588576,0.0003656721,0.00072412816,0.0005572429,0.020008799,0.009352642,0.00254783,0.016261281,0.002607749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01784384,0.0005210936,0.0007883801,0.00050248497,0.03017934,0.0048601287,0.0044830805,0.020147616,0.0004652104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032325388,0.000024398201,0.00055081944,0.00003988129,0.0000062963945,0.0010375958,0.041326888,0.00017610418,0.00039635497,0.92036784,0.028787855,0.007253755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049732833,0.00013836905,0.0020681908,0.00057918194,0.000038902515,0.00075313874,0.053343058,0.0008021636,0.001399564,0.18735337,0.75329334,0.00018109087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33107904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.462204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33107904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01532878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02909456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65830386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572439900","doi":"","title":"Take My Breath Away: Competing Contexts between Domestic Violence, Kink and the Criminal Justice System in R. v. J.A.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; Humanities; Criminal justice; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.015917369482831633,"score_gpt":0.29373647553728205,"score_spread":0.2778191060544504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572439900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33669448,0.013420614,0.0010902154,0.3104087,0.0016403294,0.0001097602,0.00008306036,0.000023519542,0.33652928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9403591,0.0015797778,0.00019750049,0.043344613,0.00033856294,0.00006211553,0.000013715893,0.00003155466,0.014073096],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98967415,0.0061008628,0.00016048973,0.0007560857,0.0009392676,0.0023691454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99349785,0.0043659965,0.0004890845,0.00014875075,0.00070193515,0.00079627946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007242241,0.0003467367,0.0005743073,0.0010853972,0.045350164,0.01683735,0.0024401415,0.011237416,0.004815551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013821508,0.00048209942,0.0004086944,0.0010366071,0.028698383,0.0084408205,0.0092072245,0.013982548,0.00051201624],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039576054,0.00007220176,0.0019166516,0.00009106405,0.000011224759,0.0032674468,0.5435729,0.00007390989,0.00023326628,0.41557792,0.02900354,0.00614032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022295537,0.000059731137,0.0048078652,0.00073636137,0.000021271891,0.0006104889,0.7681153,0.0001202703,0.00025466905,0.04598966,0.179181,0.00008109888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16010508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2928275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16010508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017145166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012582431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31834632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W257610069","doi":"10.1353/srm.2012.0023","title":"The Suffering Traveller and the Romantic Imagination by Carl Thompson","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Romanticism","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Historicism; Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Literature; Romance; Sacrifice; New Historicism; Epistemology; Art; History; Theology","score_opus":0.038956708188592835,"score_gpt":0.3569701338179007,"score_spread":0.3180134256293079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W257610069","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035308534,0.60425407,0.00049812224,0.071457826,0.00704894,0.000013679594,0.000038506794,0.000034218516,0.31312373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1771099,0.4152107,0.0010118025,0.02555379,0.0076860543,0.00008002462,0.00010362072,0.00022524255,0.3730189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991793,0.0004485464,0.000020642561,0.00008404797,0.00017607896,0.00009145316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945253,0.00032283028,0.0000430895,0.00003071203,0.000075193515,0.00007560857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063709286,0.0006138854,0.00051235873,0.0012845198,0.005394677,0.0056049023,0.0006352624,0.002298028,0.0076115765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017349701,0.00023991139,0.00019441305,0.0016357087,0.010148282,0.004066685,0.0022498716,0.0035539814,0.0021037965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022624678,0.00002296287,0.00014582167,0.00041787754,0.0000055865526,0.00023828459,0.018342605,0.00014717827,0.0001249553,0.4746289,0.46506956,0.040833674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021078504,0.000005930942,0.00020131769,0.0006349149,0.0000018515909,0.00019624873,0.0054320693,0.000036135323,0.000034393932,0.019868694,0.97357947,0.000006876372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022247152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04593199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022247152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00799064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044466783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057976425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581140645","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1431","title":"Incorporating Common Law into the Constitution of Canada: Egale v. Canada and the Status of Marriage","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Legislation; Common law; Political science; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Section (typography); Sociology; Business; Medicine","score_opus":0.014577740120674223,"score_gpt":0.25011281302574945,"score_spread":0.23553507290507522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581140645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14293024,0.014161719,0.0023906587,0.1823518,0.0011023295,0.00015598717,0.000636444,0.000075103584,0.6561957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9007905,0.004381059,0.0011193862,0.034745537,0.00015598883,0.00006183081,0.000119541044,0.000029989897,0.058596138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947665,0.00055824354,0.000102219004,0.0003257914,0.0017528185,0.0024944765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99705803,0.00093417143,0.0001659765,0.000114397655,0.0011524273,0.0005750583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030220267,0.00030107182,0.0004175251,0.0017616098,0.028900815,0.0091414405,0.0023337188,0.0071396013,0.0035634604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008951981,0.00045218418,0.00044726,0.0027810957,0.0138207795,0.0025806674,0.0033776767,0.006422057,0.00022447157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021259619,0.000017587787,0.0019977556,0.000030944484,0.000008046088,0.0004759128,0.011790772,0.0003996054,0.00020077007,0.94966507,0.027855178,0.0075371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013350762,0.000050553976,0.026971709,0.0007257933,0.00016077071,0.00037006737,0.041586515,0.002365799,0.0013487746,0.17673054,0.74912935,0.00042662665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99481875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99790895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12075213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12075213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2041261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8761221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581409875","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2905135","title":"Renewing Human Rights Law in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.020678311966874977,"score_gpt":0.3033609520590239,"score_spread":0.28268264009214894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581409875","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1995299,0.01025953,0.0021472462,0.46483698,0.0031902469,0.0003013916,0.00076292414,0.00016115363,0.3188106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6798953,0.0034017735,0.0025669462,0.1294669,0.0004661341,0.00011548785,0.00022305429,0.0001296642,0.18373474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825273,0.0017267182,0.0004245606,0.001312006,0.0051727616,0.008836553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9705768,0.0063135913,0.00084397005,0.0008417784,0.010529388,0.010894513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011148055,0.00044502216,0.0011633043,0.0028005103,0.036456577,0.023359552,0.0050347256,0.020265192,0.01607757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030266242,0.00087465264,0.0010438985,0.003947626,0.01185465,0.005324846,0.0071186074,0.016793283,0.0007045419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012617541,0.0002225575,0.011503509,0.00021733005,0.000075432785,0.0013435036,0.02026534,0.001890159,0.00082122814,0.7354212,0.1797715,0.04834213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001835773,0.000095620795,0.026515448,0.0007242148,0.0001177251,0.00020898314,0.028934924,0.0030922045,0.0008408698,0.05658404,0.8823851,0.0003173311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99661875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2476828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2476828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5679315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8725813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2582391383","doi":"","title":"After Tsilhqot'In Nation: The Aboriginal Title Question in Canada's Maritime Provinces","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Sovereignty; Assertion; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.005771348012416678,"score_gpt":0.26597423562705863,"score_spread":0.26020288761464194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2582391383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4673675,0.015919676,0.0011268636,0.07108144,0.0006844516,0.000043533448,0.00023279154,0.000021770451,0.443522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9490352,0.0025517307,0.00028619674,0.0077759186,0.000074467316,0.000008867276,0.00003698922,0.0000115282955,0.040219065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794215,0.00019213211,0.000034444365,0.00014654563,0.0005452162,0.0011394883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834955,0.00056257204,0.000110816836,0.000050621104,0.00057242444,0.0003540185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012044035,0.00013146206,0.0003065913,0.0006038809,0.025261533,0.007903249,0.0013258695,0.003583388,0.0019611032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003474618,0.00018103483,0.0002635457,0.0013094766,0.011912108,0.0017976374,0.0018373819,0.004038371,0.00013335107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055908466,0.000018275794,0.010973736,0.00012365909,0.000018345749,0.0018503175,0.123198055,0.00057349907,0.0008035804,0.8178468,0.027098952,0.01743887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003171672,0.000044075314,0.05725045,0.0008685585,0.00006424673,0.0006737782,0.26304546,0.0007051713,0.0016842232,0.047110483,0.62837523,0.00014665215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9834419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.993646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068866864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.068866864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.089685105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4996664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2582707181","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rww080","title":"The Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society v Trinity Western University","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Nova scotia; Ultra vires; Constitution; Political science; Charter; Statutory law; Human rights; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Sociology; Doctrine","score_opus":0.026604408836613073,"score_gpt":0.2836527271664773,"score_spread":0.25704831832986424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2582707181","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10910795,0.008133881,0.0011629083,0.08671146,0.0057870504,0.001994732,0.0029455537,0.00044798356,0.7837085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16944097,0.0021650433,0.0011469233,0.08449838,0.0006025928,0.0006744015,0.0007139831,0.00011016014,0.74064755],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99156594,0.00056640944,0.00045845818,0.0009841952,0.0031307023,0.0032941722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884715,0.0023947735,0.00053564797,0.00076697784,0.004237852,0.0035932332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004660201,0.00083360553,0.0007124599,0.0021695008,0.02034105,0.011297066,0.002852842,0.01236958,0.01786805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010844377,0.001947654,0.0009832367,0.0015774741,0.0042414702,0.0014270399,0.0036028598,0.010259345,0.0040142015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026439896,0.00021471389,0.020728579,0.0004083547,0.0001422968,0.007000672,0.005256426,0.0007665682,0.005280455,0.17184207,0.75361973,0.034475762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014934462,0.00010738768,0.058349226,0.00081790995,0.0001304173,0.00054186437,0.003549268,0.00063483056,0.0019578116,0.004284424,0.92920357,0.00027394618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9266567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9795903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07334328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038395893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16102727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27858305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585978807","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3029","title":"Book Review: Law’s Religion: Religious Difference and the Claims of Constitutionalism by Benjamin L. Berger","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutionalism; Sociology; Legal culture; Argument (complex analysis); Scholarship; Proposition; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.012506722010714118,"score_gpt":0.2735562152988521,"score_spread":0.261049493288138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585978807","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000118988355,0.85135424,0.00025356817,0.078461744,0.03835923,0.00001935475,0.00013055172,0.0000406341,0.03126167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003291593,0.7503039,0.00045319978,0.058026407,0.05010206,0.00008541585,0.00035313988,0.00012242026,0.13726181],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982961,0.00034038056,0.000071168986,0.00015351843,0.0010331712,0.00010566674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941713,0.0031780044,0.00037629923,0.00010744879,0.0018410006,0.00032597646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015117086,0.0010557154,0.0017484408,0.00339163,0.0014747075,0.0043326765,0.0016600522,0.0034149985,0.02799619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007530077,0.0005592603,0.00055880845,0.0056238403,0.002393207,0.0045286273,0.0017527938,0.0057282695,0.013240485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005362769,0.00000376872,0.000026154416,0.00028281487,0.0000046453497,0.000008632126,0.000034332475,0.000024109539,0.000021253274,0.0024731494,0.9782607,0.018855184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007979891,0.00000939353,0.00022408231,0.0011574798,0.00000829502,0.00006357572,0.000079573474,0.000024051105,0.000023728186,0.0022563832,0.99613625,0.000009145299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010479188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022638993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02799619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034637265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061585554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09365654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586340792","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006330","title":"‘Obligations’, Decolonization and Indigenous Rights to Governance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Obligation; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Geography","score_opus":0.01290009913857267,"score_gpt":0.2809436500038997,"score_spread":0.26804355086532705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586340792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2793067,0.0044566994,0.008319615,0.023471285,0.000108055974,0.00006886394,0.00007851207,0.000084294166,0.684106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846971,0.0005242057,0.00056933606,0.00050349836,0.000014752526,0.00001355561,0.000012030674,0.000014571076,0.013650826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610054,0.0007453538,0.00006582001,0.00034142606,0.0008905935,0.0018562934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973291,0.0006960157,0.0002802012,0.00025790412,0.00079892646,0.0006378496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002859033,0.0002807466,0.00036493797,0.0008981682,0.013007507,0.0077345828,0.0015272697,0.0015170737,0.0034077957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004161218,0.00019977428,0.00023732801,0.0011203148,0.06949294,0.0035640465,0.0050777504,0.00260688,0.0001869422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059260733,0.000006557264,0.0015106467,0.000026711836,0.0000033683189,0.00012622622,0.04172574,0.00036308265,0.00015705691,0.94918346,0.0011768547,0.0057143075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025449932,0.00003061019,0.02821147,0.00052637194,0.000032766955,0.00029543086,0.107090466,0.0019995077,0.00070355757,0.50827044,0.35269865,0.000115285475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9428063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95757335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9428063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06568148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06913258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4765547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586772489","doi":"10.1017/s0021223716000327","title":"Limits on Constitutional Rights: The Marginal Role of Proportionality Analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Dignity; Law and economics; Political science; Proportionality (law); Autonomy; Social rights; Fundamental rights; Law; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.0624862405199772,"score_gpt":0.3794631902142362,"score_spread":0.316976949694259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586772489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016542623,0.0119471615,0.3485676,0.045555,0.00093080796,0.00021422305,0.00017226771,0.0001406098,0.5759296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8919911,0.0050325496,0.071789764,0.008093016,0.0022309092,0.0009930439,0.00008683639,0.00026905473,0.019513667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9545489,0.027774615,0.0015557768,0.005544347,0.008884481,0.0016919909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90537673,0.07602995,0.0026195329,0.008778734,0.0061273756,0.0010676548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05079808,0.0009469236,0.0018101869,0.0037250658,0.006738747,0.012543892,0.004528447,0.0057557616,0.0082556065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09261017,0.0010762884,0.0019106523,0.0024695047,0.08325603,0.0295633,0.010459453,0.016474888,0.001031675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016796897,0.0000020102354,0.000026376121,0.000008826136,0.000002324017,0.000007577966,0.00019396142,0.00007299425,0.000009343708,0.99831855,0.00019374272,0.0011625483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050050753,0.0000038003943,0.000027682743,0.000028215709,0.000003680294,0.000014932082,0.00005238718,0.00034713213,0.00003771702,0.9945201,0.0049539288,0.0000053959093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008379328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035841272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05079808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011389299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006692664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2686491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587847431","doi":"","title":"Case Comment: Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Immigration; Political science; Law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.03481040752724373,"score_gpt":0.28298610950324254,"score_spread":0.2481757019759988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587847431","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020958671,0.0019567737,0.00035572055,0.8620319,0.003924884,0.000093389724,0.00084808253,0.00012203452,0.10970848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.097463906,0.0014865205,0.00036706802,0.75842893,0.0008374191,0.00006088337,0.00016932141,0.00008015266,0.1411057],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974105,0.00018189073,0.00008141114,0.00030490177,0.0008529289,0.0011683939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973788,0.00089294906,0.00012102974,0.00006722701,0.0008335879,0.0007063802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018367828,0.0005154973,0.0005511204,0.0008441013,0.026358228,0.0042926,0.0032288407,0.02649141,0.014942032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0082376795,0.0007073028,0.00064079685,0.0018553672,0.004851633,0.0020372856,0.0017214556,0.020750796,0.0019363104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049253405,0.000018804238,0.0018999415,0.00006021753,0.000009568472,0.0020380248,0.0062239645,0.00010424351,0.00026042905,0.030007392,0.95512575,0.0042023603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060558476,0.000029981393,0.0061731776,0.00031633233,0.00006591049,0.0014681052,0.02511744,0.00035880788,0.00084573904,0.006002535,0.95942944,0.00013208808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96624416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9825357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034970973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034970973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07163593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25373334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588286494","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4816","title":"DRIVING THE GIFT HOME","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Narrative; Constitutionalism; Section (typography); Treaty; Politics; Sociology; Colonialism; History; Law; Political science; Literature; Art; Democracy","score_opus":0.06954741630039481,"score_gpt":0.3789582868100378,"score_spread":0.309410870509643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588286494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05570994,0.0032364326,0.0050239316,0.13173209,0.0025147474,0.000075505006,0.00023277082,0.00026642525,0.80120826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72929114,0.0014254497,0.002033744,0.020356592,0.00018997342,0.00004725707,0.00009869604,0.0003018513,0.24625532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969014,0.00067196274,0.00002729767,0.00032543522,0.0005086885,0.0015653026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977016,0.00031869678,0.00008079069,0.00017259066,0.00051776576,0.001208703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003156952,0.0004093237,0.00031287043,0.0010564091,0.03560478,0.01410635,0.0015620845,0.0044677076,0.032893248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006281985,0.0002563743,0.00035084374,0.001073542,0.0336061,0.0077407043,0.011890038,0.0057547954,0.0035704258],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021004444,0.000017364639,0.0010515356,0.000029339755,0.00000268257,0.00032509275,0.050076533,0.00006609704,0.0001261154,0.8458724,0.08418779,0.018223982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010003812,0.00000927816,0.0008721442,0.0001235877,0.0000037408122,0.000112350855,0.062311657,0.00012148127,0.00013809917,0.045481976,0.89079744,0.000018248249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67761356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8122566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32238644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039105814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0448255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64857006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589003308","doi":"10.7202/1038493ar","title":"Toward a Bijural Interpretation of the Principle of Respect in Aboriginal Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitution; Flourishing; Politics; Political science; Supreme court; Colonialism; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0343078951375821,"score_gpt":0.34587883658361923,"score_spread":0.31157094144603714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589003308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04958385,0.005122452,0.13770789,0.05462092,0.000995929,0.00012539665,0.00004237854,0.00006680076,0.7517342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9549939,0.0013288314,0.0286389,0.0033574994,0.00031298646,0.00013262618,0.000023112567,0.00004335748,0.011168938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99039966,0.006324463,0.00039033638,0.00064532564,0.0016145116,0.00062567595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946602,0.0027439345,0.00048966444,0.0006868068,0.0010591989,0.0003600924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011449637,0.0003455583,0.0005768588,0.0021525105,0.008049638,0.011610417,0.0020048458,0.0034006243,0.0013417188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009555621,0.00045576945,0.0005903148,0.0014803692,0.070120715,0.008831084,0.0066656535,0.00897554,0.000281876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010574805,0.0000019442662,0.00002814474,0.0000032286064,4.2853438e-7,0.0000085365655,0.0018072013,0.00003195388,0.00001438974,0.9975496,0.0001125063,0.0004410891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044260933,0.000007859348,0.0001670173,0.00004129921,0.0000034730206,0.000027818462,0.0023571618,0.00023914906,0.00006680625,0.97672355,0.020352224,0.000009162862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015624775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015746169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98437524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007183024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00866512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06055218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589773886","doi":"","title":"The Philosophy of Law in Canada’s North","year":2016,"lang":"fi","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lauda (University of Lapland)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.026989274802429044,"score_gpt":0.21098793512976952,"score_spread":0.18399866032734047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589773886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014051093,0.019081002,0.0022078904,0.049157258,0.00062446465,0.00002356406,0.00012468133,0.000070295166,0.9146597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5989473,0.016083226,0.0034297034,0.019844383,0.00021180268,0.000087795706,0.00012552345,0.00012537834,0.36114493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970086,0.00040166872,0.00004681395,0.0002988304,0.0011023297,0.0011416677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988036,0.00024348624,0.00004216389,0.000048569094,0.00051460176,0.00034760908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013834732,0.00041459742,0.0003851402,0.0016447611,0.023240589,0.010423639,0.00152057,0.0027068947,0.0064722043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017968161,0.00039272557,0.00035992204,0.002849232,0.023700247,0.0030053959,0.0027300308,0.0048159813,0.0006735637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005929068,0.000005912162,0.0003097517,0.000030601557,0.0000029197463,0.00013792998,0.014609102,0.00020651905,0.00008862144,0.93923664,0.036028884,0.009337212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000082607185,0.000005298383,0.00239624,0.00031042137,0.000007824127,0.0001233154,0.013311835,0.0003167713,0.00009688196,0.1246053,0.85878366,0.00003428936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99223983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16463841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16463841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22343309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96890104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590791466","doi":"10.3138/chr.98.1.borrows","title":"Challenging Historical Frameworks: Aboriginal Rights, The Trickster, and Originalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Historical Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Treaty; Indigenous; Sovereignty; Constitution; Political science; Indigenous rights; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.046005310275345976,"score_gpt":0.339512218896094,"score_spread":0.293506908620748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590791466","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017456641,0.631163,0.0017313303,0.08055657,0.0015450438,0.000030695744,0.000121968136,0.000020734158,0.267374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6088031,0.3589199,0.0017800893,0.007867827,0.0015176897,0.00005059665,0.00013982218,0.000041037296,0.020880058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955656,0.002253419,0.00011064406,0.00028904894,0.0011155085,0.0006658757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951748,0.0024671832,0.00045815113,0.0003008634,0.0012021706,0.0003968635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067095556,0.0006090196,0.0006397174,0.0065649645,0.012895247,0.012371369,0.0022540565,0.0022093083,0.0045823473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071978793,0.00026684374,0.00033397914,0.00801008,0.05618384,0.0072882636,0.003444172,0.003979205,0.00023321966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054137436,0.000007823563,0.00030350138,0.00031286242,0.0000075879075,0.00018186281,0.029071825,0.000115589435,0.000027095088,0.94128114,0.007613779,0.021071441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073036285,0.000012335416,0.003574319,0.004794362,0.000039273382,0.00035407598,0.06852229,0.0001293613,0.00010409829,0.21454503,0.70789045,0.000027107848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77226764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8475778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22773236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060990386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07236137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.458147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591075658","doi":"","title":"Le droit à L'égalité sous la loupe de la théorie critique du handicap (The Right to Equality and Critical Disability Theory)","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Humanities; Sociology; Derecho; Charter; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0075903022100756255,"score_gpt":0.3062160738520147,"score_spread":0.2986257716419391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591075658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04498768,0.030741673,0.028655853,0.10790229,0.0010648458,0.000051508003,0.00015092755,0.000051758296,0.78639346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9248027,0.0062600854,0.00263002,0.00502433,0.0005891308,0.000097234355,0.00004473401,0.00006535899,0.06048641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938782,0.0039969073,0.00011134812,0.0006622777,0.0006889229,0.00066228874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966271,0.0022943262,0.00024335101,0.00030699177,0.00035330866,0.00017493647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043756114,0.0005814637,0.00042306466,0.0016880183,0.005825083,0.00970212,0.0010443033,0.004313248,0.011185254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005437501,0.00023006606,0.00050481956,0.0014861086,0.039882522,0.0076979017,0.004591067,0.0052353814,0.00088398164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046554724,0.000002297347,0.000063530984,0.000028300099,0.0000015775965,0.000041563046,0.0040344573,0.0000766735,0.000028684366,0.99259055,0.0014297288,0.0016980377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014988558,0.000016813992,0.00070807047,0.00038268202,0.000009500658,0.00016251355,0.008929335,0.00036223017,0.00026448077,0.8086605,0.18046825,0.000020737516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023497025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017502988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023497025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011428101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059007807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082917094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592762408","doi":"10.1108/s2398-601820170000001012","title":"The ‘Ethics Rupture’ and the New Brunswick Declaration","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Summit; Declaration; Opposition (politics); Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Geography; Philosophy; Cartography","score_opus":0.08402650501663772,"score_gpt":0.3401808586301885,"score_spread":0.25615435361355077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592762408","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025984375,0.03520983,0.0038606508,0.5237046,0.01071203,0.00013528037,0.00015132864,0.000052045223,0.42357582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24859653,0.024207141,0.012558446,0.32811782,0.0029157852,0.00079517544,0.00041933087,0.00033695324,0.38205284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9520308,0.025924426,0.0019438544,0.0024259249,0.013508101,0.0041668955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9586065,0.028843885,0.0016231495,0.0021757314,0.0069728657,0.0017779713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047039725,0.00059952156,0.00077022304,0.0018280577,0.010471536,0.01563366,0.0030216835,0.010248824,0.0056223474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05451027,0.0006953713,0.00042766653,0.002890492,0.03459949,0.008098624,0.006534233,0.024212632,0.0019238567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059971835,0.0000024618753,0.00003684734,0.00006248523,0.0000018951176,0.000119430486,0.004679196,0.00006189819,0.000056575696,0.8970612,0.091751754,0.0061601917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005188533,0.000003178239,0.00012378572,0.0008203125,0.0000022275117,0.000099451536,0.0019095625,0.00005942964,0.000083484316,0.09576378,0.90110344,0.000026195554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17539373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21164829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8246063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053244248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08757039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38631588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593509048","doi":"","title":"Laws of Desire: The Political Morality of Public Sex","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Mores; Morality; Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Human sexuality; Constitution; Sociology; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.046950757674692,"score_gpt":0.3369622127062817,"score_spread":0.2900114550315897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593509048","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056156088,0.0026810365,0.011740277,0.08749776,0.00037432942,0.000036617228,0.000037696413,0.000034681954,0.8414414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844476,0.0005063508,0.0006052847,0.0032149665,0.000106863714,0.000027676377,0.000009893637,0.000022620208,0.011058717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99240017,0.00416613,0.00013206828,0.0005109348,0.0015227586,0.0012679413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945503,0.0033811543,0.00045568772,0.0006082935,0.0005486198,0.00045597635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006760562,0.00022418668,0.00027235266,0.0010768212,0.009885459,0.013358623,0.0009549964,0.0045475727,0.0033465885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012658022,0.00028581943,0.00035987952,0.0008895857,0.08572288,0.008076151,0.0053416193,0.005907184,0.00031704176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017925998,0.0000035116889,0.00011727525,0.0000036851422,7.398129e-7,0.000018704846,0.006236532,0.000030900523,0.000024036175,0.9916849,0.0005938029,0.0012841306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000113636515,0.000009433583,0.0006697529,0.00006400116,0.0000041185513,0.0000847096,0.013155387,0.00027936726,0.00016174858,0.9096886,0.07585849,0.000013122237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029800331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022964336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029800331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00890177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010388221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064587176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595633389","doi":"","title":"Une justice fraternelle : Éléments de la pensée de Charles Doherty Gonthier (Fraternal Justice: Outlining Charles Doherty Gonthier’s Approach to Law, Morality and Community)","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Morality; Economic Justice; Tribute; Citizenship; Compassion; Humanism; Sociology; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.03094576199664323,"score_gpt":0.32528037689890216,"score_spread":0.29433461490225893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595633389","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008510494,0.0731715,0.0059613027,0.6677948,0.009324526,0.000056729346,0.000047784888,0.000045174478,0.23508768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42562667,0.03049756,0.007348959,0.34527037,0.0057256734,0.00020476441,0.000039891176,0.00019904294,0.18508705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99570185,0.0019959456,0.00006734376,0.000465311,0.0011099261,0.0006595987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763715,0.0013875726,0.00011369199,0.00011529388,0.0004170677,0.00032927154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004607746,0.00037156447,0.00045439237,0.0009867469,0.01643641,0.00905954,0.0014127418,0.0080049895,0.0032092505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007187061,0.00028637232,0.00028659328,0.0011684953,0.035153013,0.006185045,0.004365121,0.0121136615,0.0005348218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005977664,0.000011347508,0.00016909713,0.00003408695,0.0000026602888,0.00015412069,0.020865927,0.00007876439,0.00007007634,0.8342529,0.13610312,0.008251946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000470667,0.000006011192,0.00039548246,0.00029918333,0.000002424157,0.00012385445,0.008396384,0.00006809498,0.000058807334,0.14249764,0.84812695,0.000020461308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17748554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30023462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17748554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014357786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014651101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35290492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596834643","doi":"","title":"The Ontario Leadership Framework for Catholic Principals and Vice-Principals: Purpose versus Practice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Educational leadership; Leadership style; Political science; Pedagogy; Psychology; Management; Public relations","score_opus":0.08323041899183665,"score_gpt":0.3543342205135318,"score_spread":0.27110380152169516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596834643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5231447,0.019035881,0.008900034,0.1821374,0.0023499841,0.0012296527,0.00028366302,0.00012535113,0.26279327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96389484,0.0054459404,0.006960205,0.0044271783,0.00011994604,0.00029813242,0.00008349947,0.000035798053,0.018734511],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99334055,0.003026589,0.00015264918,0.00034373414,0.0013437016,0.0017928183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916082,0.0012201135,0.0007672685,0.00030744096,0.0017300028,0.004366936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008165698,0.00031623757,0.00027987937,0.0012027342,0.014380538,0.007882895,0.0016106501,0.0012426558,0.0021187176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0079884855,0.00024844392,0.00027142646,0.0021442827,0.019949414,0.0025643932,0.0051464792,0.002068789,0.0002508388],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000908822,0.00020009546,0.041715637,0.0009768656,0.000015017081,0.0023526158,0.560244,0.00043133405,0.0010870736,0.18428215,0.07539652,0.13320775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030962594,0.000082732986,0.021203691,0.00091379695,0.000010014726,0.00046802333,0.4462364,0.00024836935,0.00014447354,0.006911556,0.5237004,0.000049478793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6777228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90553486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92332244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07667755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19000295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64835024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597031627","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4813","title":"STL’UL NUP: LEGAL LANDSCAPES OF THE HUL’QUMI’NUM MUSTIMUHW","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Identity (music); Meaning (existential); Ethnology; Humanities; Relation (database); Law; Geography; Political science; Sociology; Aesthetics; Art; Ecology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05527603088047359,"score_gpt":0.36526010277526394,"score_spread":0.3099840718947904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597031627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6572092,0.012679214,0.0007955701,0.008814649,0.00020341737,0.000038978997,0.00013552819,0.000022124705,0.32010126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9735078,0.002521898,0.0004400781,0.00025056346,0.000014589244,0.000015439276,0.00004034132,0.000008041171,0.02320124],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984777,0.00004579033,0.0000035568223,0.000012031966,0.000029228688,0.000061639774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998969,0.00003028876,0.0000138399355,0.0000074660143,0.0000132239675,0.000038294642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019330879,0.000114937095,0.00011377913,0.00041130884,0.0073968247,0.0027527667,0.00033502225,0.00049981364,0.0040398114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030731998,0.00014540777,0.000047528203,0.000903232,0.0050231535,0.001442271,0.0016116926,0.0007068632,0.00021319711],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004157727,0.0000543174,0.02995339,0.0003064488,0.000007686673,0.0038063044,0.5539977,0.00025391678,0.0018066388,0.22088742,0.02762665,0.16125795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004578601,0.000029485887,0.08318258,0.00034786947,0.0000061663654,0.00156899,0.45855784,0.00023967274,0.00049239903,0.011805653,0.44374314,0.00002167367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18584399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4838097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18584399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053936695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040363194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36952454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597368698","doi":"","title":"Achieving Transparency in Implementing Abortion Laws","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Abortion; Human rights; Scrutiny; Supreme court; Appeal; Duty; Political science; Transparency (behavior)","score_opus":0.03905139960577451,"score_gpt":0.3768095536594647,"score_spread":0.3377581540536902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597368698","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058895443,0.0052929013,0.1240436,0.40895933,0.001139626,0.0007841007,0.00012469514,0.00067684683,0.40008348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9124183,0.0024504447,0.054111317,0.019462446,0.00064590486,0.00042595953,0.000078294775,0.00015431565,0.010253037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8818274,0.06704671,0.0059437943,0.0046263947,0.030809155,0.009746539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8147254,0.12903845,0.016784608,0.015678009,0.018610941,0.005162663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.108266726,0.0004902063,0.0004946426,0.0024683517,0.005957882,0.01368552,0.0022875606,0.00856641,0.0044707735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1643122,0.00089594297,0.0007380993,0.0014909095,0.014070538,0.011620331,0.014132389,0.011710579,0.00081469497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036500194,0.00011878885,0.0043376526,0.00025014108,0.000034654917,0.00026711848,0.0209767,0.0034769992,0.0012542069,0.85063064,0.018935774,0.09968087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008534471,0.00013758965,0.0064153317,0.0014644765,0.000052564865,0.00023460499,0.009956967,0.0046677403,0.0035296492,0.7311334,0.24221261,0.00010967773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018268976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020684343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.108266726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013923255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054783344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57257605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597815503","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2919492","title":"Costs and the Changing Culture of Canadian Family Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.018622334874381054,"score_gpt":0.2941617295706168,"score_spread":0.2755393946962358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597815503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68442076,0.003539155,0.0006955366,0.12312678,0.0005912295,0.000049616086,0.00027846798,0.000028281991,0.18727012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893847,0.0005089849,0.00016715612,0.0022308459,0.00003562134,0.000010796326,0.000022049557,0.00001733587,0.0076225763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98735875,0.0024426978,0.00026316883,0.00079324114,0.004043376,0.0050986335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813762,0.003597159,0.0012986088,0.0006072913,0.0070450655,0.0060756877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006096779,0.0003544627,0.00046832094,0.0032114536,0.051010188,0.016242703,0.0030426492,0.0032555643,0.011217861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026441276,0.00034913226,0.00034902213,0.0041521173,0.022483043,0.0038625782,0.0066430857,0.0061356346,0.00022266357],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001496585,0.000118716365,0.034353767,0.00012891862,0.000051821855,0.00093145156,0.3135294,0.00088585925,0.00046371043,0.5550515,0.039239887,0.055095326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003298172,0.00005429848,0.094469674,0.00049191405,0.00005930468,0.000297504,0.5876534,0.00085279875,0.00038182334,0.03658136,0.2788553,0.00026960913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99479324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75359225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24640778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22366312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87406015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601584935","doi":"","title":"Review of Harring, Sidney L., White Man=s Law: Native People in Nineteenth-Century Canadian Jurisprudence","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; White (mutation); Law; Political science; Sociology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.03566529163800994,"score_gpt":0.28181270599885355,"score_spread":0.2461474143608436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601584935","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000117380696,0.9832344,0.00003735155,0.012451562,0.0018166814,0.0000051804072,0.00009706436,0.0000032547653,0.0022371756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026767119,0.98686975,0.00008877198,0.0059492104,0.0016263436,0.000008733792,0.00010068406,0.00000599505,0.0026737908],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773574,0.0002934536,0.00020611862,0.00016404665,0.0014003373,0.00020019243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828876,0.0040566465,0.00067408744,0.00022899744,0.011286628,0.0008660284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004402008,0.0007670887,0.0015534038,0.010793748,0.0028892555,0.003608503,0.0022309355,0.002120737,0.0053832987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013524068,0.0003683208,0.00037438388,0.019314159,0.003604815,0.002120849,0.0015739399,0.0023528612,0.0012280722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023659526,0.000013074319,0.00046976164,0.008944895,0.00006477003,0.00009023707,0.0011121002,0.00008554937,0.00010065608,0.007338448,0.8162604,0.16549642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047201206,0.0000058745713,0.0031307912,0.0060457867,0.000052239375,0.00009231713,0.00045352092,0.000009416382,0.000031416363,0.00062508334,0.98953664,0.000012090886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6400404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84389716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3599596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019759983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06590431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72415894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602182565","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4811","title":"WANISKĀ: REIMAGINING THE FUTURE WITH INDIGENOUS LEGAL TRADITIONS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Narrative; Power (physics); Sociology; Law; Commission; Political science; Aesthetics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.05045419123617117,"score_gpt":0.3497937817313528,"score_spread":0.2993395904951816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602182565","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26480848,0.022739604,0.007455953,0.19194546,0.0015218375,0.000099175675,0.00018990452,0.00013350586,0.5111061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9469123,0.0052813864,0.0025320414,0.004634698,0.000074416464,0.000029119683,0.00004953935,0.000061877436,0.040424667],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630547,0.0015345783,0.000060502145,0.00023974747,0.0007560068,0.0011037758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99662626,0.0009708496,0.00020359516,0.00023941493,0.0008424585,0.0011174432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048665097,0.00035110724,0.00036049364,0.0013009598,0.040374104,0.015620896,0.0018234435,0.0022791883,0.0051568435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005705907,0.00020487246,0.00027124537,0.0016044611,0.034629166,0.009147066,0.007917177,0.004785156,0.00031286568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013079403,0.000013386291,0.0016318366,0.000060857048,0.00000446404,0.0005737509,0.6189724,0.000121839694,0.00021576314,0.34262583,0.015371296,0.020395406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024322396,0.000008958848,0.0013177035,0.00035338325,0.000008568573,0.00027791702,0.4944163,0.00024859433,0.00024117474,0.035483126,0.46761402,0.000027727041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8947969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9447436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8947969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07063504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.110926114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5124955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603201379","doi":"","title":"Limiting the Legal Liability of Religious Institutions for their Clergy: Cavanaugh v. Grenville Christian College","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Appeal; Liability; Obligation; Law; Jurisprudence; Legal liability","score_opus":0.03983698994163903,"score_gpt":0.3037155938956197,"score_spread":0.26387860395398066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603201379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39523855,0.0044402927,0.0013412351,0.10999664,0.00040244422,0.0001998584,0.00010788536,0.000049908358,0.48822314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94086325,0.0009436501,0.00041449172,0.017345924,0.00012672014,0.000056980523,0.000025715779,0.000011969218,0.04021123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99523675,0.0008258977,0.00012117521,0.00042092428,0.0014348391,0.001960438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99450964,0.0023419245,0.0005412938,0.00038571356,0.00096514006,0.0012562285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033429847,0.00026905377,0.0002064532,0.0009086503,0.010561147,0.005398969,0.002649112,0.008822731,0.0039396095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007079243,0.0003969958,0.00035321058,0.0007006864,0.009022445,0.001542559,0.0037382534,0.005690918,0.00042194297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017553917,0.00012306609,0.03636655,0.0001922321,0.00004652887,0.010259905,0.04598346,0.0007596103,0.006496161,0.83097124,0.046807926,0.021817887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030741526,0.00037038524,0.09480637,0.0014687448,0.0002148226,0.004043589,0.06743605,0.002086751,0.008702245,0.052540645,0.76745147,0.0005714819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78139186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9307026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78139186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02396228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03544584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603315228","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4809","title":"LISTENING TO LAW","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Connaught Fund; University of Toronto; University of Minnesota","keywords":"Active listening; Humanities; Identity (music); Sociology; Indigenous; Character (mathematics); Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.08423744014614801,"score_gpt":0.39914969431920366,"score_spread":0.3149122541730557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603315228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032067113,0.01031215,0.0057176496,0.17363682,0.005820395,0.00010934602,0.00013497373,0.00024919256,0.7719524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52263796,0.010914475,0.0028774804,0.055395957,0.0015622418,0.00022609338,0.00013716136,0.00030397973,0.40594462],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945287,0.0031802203,0.00010433011,0.00040466682,0.00093888864,0.0008431681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99478745,0.0022355802,0.0002859535,0.00027267376,0.0008665104,0.0015518114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003768658,0.000525214,0.0003861847,0.0009220813,0.01927467,0.011287781,0.0014252756,0.004659405,0.025074476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016860787,0.00029565365,0.00037787686,0.00074979395,0.021187268,0.010909652,0.008375648,0.008715404,0.0064005726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000140101,0.000062806044,0.00065470306,0.00011054122,0.0000056683816,0.0014641805,0.5863264,0.000044539378,0.00065978675,0.13276781,0.23571806,0.042171456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026932116,0.000016272548,0.00036713603,0.00029913662,0.0000021707328,0.0005562802,0.22452511,0.000039065235,0.00014245018,0.011349113,0.76268756,0.000013114186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016461704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02025072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025074476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051196474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059924657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08388251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603920394","doi":"10.1177/000332861609800306","title":"The Importance of Moral Authority: Reflections on Current Events in the Anglican Communion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Current (fluid); Philosophy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.17359864084435128,"score_gpt":0.4484727301166583,"score_spread":0.274874089272307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603920394","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3640208,0.025344552,0.00135094,0.3921408,0.0126071125,0.000076356686,0.00007435677,0.000050425388,0.20433466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94492716,0.0027976108,0.0001870495,0.03213736,0.0029890472,0.000034700377,0.00001941987,0.00008227177,0.016825428],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97242695,0.017563488,0.0005293077,0.0012775422,0.0026934594,0.005509238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816914,0.010382831,0.0012449266,0.0004094537,0.0020059836,0.00426545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02400151,0.00049884367,0.00073246146,0.0014739141,0.058521796,0.02659607,0.0033225731,0.010766732,0.005842345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02084377,0.0011070536,0.0005560642,0.0014417424,0.06357605,0.011660598,0.012524334,0.033002257,0.00069934153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033626147,0.000034595694,0.0007734634,0.00006285541,0.000006040698,0.00072254817,0.90290076,0.000032320593,0.00009914485,0.07420701,0.01805846,0.0030691489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008448962,0.000021896201,0.0014423096,0.00026526046,0.000003609665,0.00024113161,0.8359913,0.00005735101,0.00008743842,0.0054946924,0.15634817,0.000038328413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04760835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07945985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058521796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020090865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008414803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14577007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604334801","doi":"10.7202/1038490ar","title":"The Lifeworlds of Law: On Revitalizing Indigenous Legal Orders Today","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Vanier College","funders":"","keywords":"Lifeworld; Indigenous; Law; Constitutionalism; Sociology; Constitutional law; Political science; Democracy; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.03365580843012047,"score_gpt":0.31255796152186643,"score_spread":0.278902153091746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604334801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08359757,0.020415189,0.017646814,0.18138663,0.0013503307,0.000108489025,0.000043952918,0.00020803916,0.69524294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9369811,0.0074096033,0.0046622804,0.010715573,0.0003011673,0.0000820027,0.00003206657,0.000108485605,0.039707683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953589,0.0019044951,0.00009125062,0.00033983088,0.0009944815,0.001311026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962011,0.001981559,0.00021207338,0.00044014596,0.0006853821,0.0004797548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075564045,0.000522233,0.0005034493,0.002435357,0.024333505,0.016358057,0.0025886218,0.005387567,0.004044549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006636509,0.00030097683,0.00052187004,0.001706525,0.1149556,0.01905897,0.009673482,0.009668235,0.00038951472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017041801,0.000007186248,0.00009968191,0.000019142959,9.394597e-7,0.000069762624,0.063435026,0.00006173497,0.00006046538,0.9308353,0.0016301197,0.0037787715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060117086,0.00001968077,0.0008837714,0.00031722803,0.000007824514,0.0001451192,0.15471655,0.00042680817,0.0003294971,0.5128417,0.330269,0.00003682583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34260768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.435782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6573923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04323096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038935315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68122697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604920027","doi":"10.4000/droitcultures.4073","title":"La situation juridique des conjoints de fait québécois","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Droit et Cultures","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill Genome Centre; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Université de Sherbrooke; Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University Health Centre; International Civil Aviation Organization","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Art; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03351568868676169,"score_gpt":0.3469297845803818,"score_spread":0.3134140958936201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604920027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6693588,0.0039100805,0.0019092757,0.026100293,0.00048556505,0.000083828214,0.00042580598,0.000048983045,0.29767737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9198379,0.00089182303,0.000423133,0.0017375598,0.000035796027,0.000024841314,0.00008766612,0.000015532893,0.07694584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982681,0.0002837946,0.000027933413,0.00019540999,0.0003518054,0.0008729176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988288,0.00020512172,0.00012560392,0.000050160354,0.00031807556,0.00047221026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010480328,0.00029288293,0.00032279082,0.0010345121,0.036242567,0.005653847,0.0009935626,0.002401146,0.020886365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022236258,0.00030295723,0.00023910482,0.0016588428,0.008338226,0.0017371477,0.003528889,0.0038764258,0.0007459824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014243778,0.00004846941,0.047371484,0.00021173879,0.00008417697,0.0073323315,0.30166477,0.0009804129,0.0021221924,0.5159164,0.068805076,0.05532044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022986944,0.000030274321,0.060712762,0.00046336855,0.000055854412,0.0013553817,0.36120176,0.00046982153,0.0006413681,0.012159562,0.56273925,0.00014758178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9702635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99217683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043085314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043085314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053200446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3126073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606399519","doi":"10.1177/000332861709900139","title":"Book Review: Aging Matters: Finding Your Calling for the Rest of Your Life","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rest (music); Philosophy; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.15974509083314753,"score_gpt":0.427119041823704,"score_spread":0.2673739509905565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606399519","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008393832,0.9309345,0.00016051054,0.017596813,0.036311872,0.00004915382,0.00025098148,0.00007647046,0.014535727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009034812,0.90195286,0.00027954183,0.017087596,0.02016166,0.00009837316,0.00047010026,0.00006922849,0.05897717],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900585,0.00013331404,0.00009123851,0.00011133654,0.0005909592,0.00006734914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964761,0.0011826309,0.00033075167,0.00007444479,0.001514054,0.00042203607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008596985,0.0015589404,0.002118888,0.0027904199,0.0009228139,0.0041908617,0.0019680124,0.003146667,0.05618776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067899865,0.00073689397,0.0008405053,0.0051785926,0.0009271385,0.0037701835,0.0013157963,0.004978182,0.044619486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008187956,0.0000089384675,0.000025008307,0.0011268012,0.000007158081,0.000017807486,0.000023224875,0.000018647763,0.000028440385,0.00023328443,0.9601095,0.038392894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009661975,0.000019380472,0.00024241295,0.002778372,0.000015223444,0.00025810383,0.00005202018,0.000014863577,0.000021644906,0.0002752988,0.99630225,0.000010687001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054156207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010908489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05618776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017012196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039781113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18796682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606519287","doi":"","title":"The Doctrine of Lost Modern Grant and Prescriptive Easements in Newfoundland","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Easement; Political science; Humanities; Doctrine; Law; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02591238136236075,"score_gpt":0.28901682981998017,"score_spread":0.26310444845761943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606519287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2739146,0.0054772138,0.016433742,0.03963439,0.00033621956,0.00009745053,0.00033052906,0.00021707469,0.66355884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9075119,0.0007829759,0.0024633545,0.0034928937,0.000087680826,0.000085275926,0.000046388133,0.000053134372,0.085476376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99079305,0.0019884254,0.0005758571,0.0014612412,0.0021472771,0.0030340892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871701,0.005520164,0.0017611973,0.0021716505,0.0024116314,0.00096525677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062869373,0.0002465152,0.00035017662,0.0014880658,0.009661307,0.008922858,0.0015635197,0.0026460157,0.003593997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015615756,0.00059799897,0.0003461295,0.0016818246,0.03398986,0.005511642,0.0060210386,0.0065675154,0.00044242147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040597468,0.000019193792,0.0051040575,0.000042275682,0.000009354433,0.00033349375,0.02065447,0.00038081224,0.00046762684,0.94160897,0.005609344,0.025729802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057086614,0.00015969209,0.054917876,0.0008158573,0.00006646998,0.0008534528,0.02029999,0.0015237884,0.0021736578,0.13200746,0.7867668,0.00035784245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.739323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.818782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26067698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05445748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037372816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5244243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606711388","doi":"","title":"Do constitutional rights matter? The impact of section 35 on Aboriginal and treaty rights in Canada.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deep Blue (University of Michigan)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Section (typography); Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.008240359850108219,"score_gpt":0.2516302483531524,"score_spread":0.2433898885030442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606711388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42164972,0.003672754,0.0018162905,0.060842484,0.00029437954,0.0001730512,0.0003284254,0.00003747359,0.5111854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757293,0.0010503394,0.0006817646,0.0049759024,0.000030960782,0.000034010773,0.00005047862,0.000020625388,0.017426645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9786003,0.0034860866,0.00033808633,0.0017100384,0.008119797,0.0077456655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98588425,0.006383474,0.0010848071,0.0006018935,0.00429513,0.0017504643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011271508,0.00032397656,0.000494331,0.0020843113,0.02439587,0.012576472,0.002168578,0.0029066368,0.0075315023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02968957,0.00037829462,0.0006740681,0.0037500262,0.030599613,0.005632046,0.0051790373,0.0062507303,0.0003125473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051164356,0.000054355674,0.024000404,0.00009802036,0.000032219294,0.00059172447,0.06082858,0.0006967207,0.00050618965,0.8782118,0.011434852,0.023494013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008249689,0.00012185578,0.2180724,0.0013050302,0.00038636965,0.00034307025,0.22180697,0.002603109,0.0017403532,0.14245133,0.41081744,0.00026955156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98938715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99392223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17168878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17168878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21906053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96072364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W260681899","doi":"","title":"Trapped In-between A Narrative Exploration of Race, Gender, and Class.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Race (biology); Class (philosophy); Gender studies; Narrative inquiry; Multiculturalism; Identity (music); China; Ethnic group; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Political science; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Anthropology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.12299807240226361,"score_gpt":0.3600744228277921,"score_spread":0.2370763504255285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W260681899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8365686,0.0038835874,0.020688565,0.018264286,0.00074302306,0.00039227257,0.0007687546,0.00006174354,0.11862913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97564924,0.00091643207,0.0027148225,0.00084865955,0.000056494246,0.00017048123,0.00013015002,0.000036132664,0.019477518],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967721,0.0025163253,0.00005218392,0.00018460533,0.00021339204,0.00026134896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99579066,0.0027274291,0.000381613,0.0002030165,0.00034123962,0.0005559436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003504451,0.00049322145,0.00038205308,0.0010098828,0.009131167,0.0058118403,0.00095545326,0.0013022418,0.0035152666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007270703,0.00031867938,0.00025687317,0.0011178502,0.009492746,0.0059713735,0.005784378,0.002417267,0.0003465814],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021380134,0.000017782844,0.0014913687,0.00004893826,0.0000033810577,0.0005873451,0.9687006,0.000025543954,0.00038406107,0.022612827,0.002030365,0.0040764655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029344067,0.000017375796,0.0010522674,0.00011362277,0.000004928779,0.00042224335,0.9182257,0.000111781446,0.00041589793,0.0037689435,0.07585305,0.0000112428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007662233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019407878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009131167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026400841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022325516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019155264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607195990","doi":"10.29173/alr772","title":"A Constitutional Future for Abortion Rights in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Entitlement (fair division); Accountability; Political science; Democracy; Law; Transparency (behavior); Abortion law; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Institution; Reproductive rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Family planning; Research methodology; Population; Politics; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.02848064852639465,"score_gpt":0.33161051175278417,"score_spread":0.3031298632263895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607195990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039605357,0.09064367,0.003909013,0.30060554,0.0018896838,0.000111417634,0.00089199963,0.00008179162,0.5622616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8304085,0.054555446,0.004742864,0.04874197,0.00065355055,0.00007935049,0.00051177957,0.000052506428,0.060254056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894237,0.0012541688,0.00027392872,0.0008516891,0.0046888934,0.003507697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99204046,0.0019591935,0.00027223685,0.0003523243,0.004017075,0.0013587454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070847017,0.00028293685,0.0005336018,0.00242306,0.01693528,0.01152028,0.0023664345,0.0049617975,0.0046050563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011721842,0.00044063086,0.0005777604,0.002318414,0.019067977,0.0033164867,0.0030131682,0.008760489,0.00026834646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006861086,0.0000055476407,0.0004003086,0.000053326043,0.0000066850607,0.00008466241,0.0014038866,0.0002864289,0.000091296286,0.975593,0.01178423,0.010283747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045402634,0.000021540485,0.0077853636,0.0009451462,0.00005713708,0.00015686879,0.0050365077,0.0008484922,0.00038944065,0.17913175,0.8054595,0.00012281204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9911015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18316878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18316878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34546953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94740844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607865436","doi":"","title":"Ties that Bind: Religious Freedom and Communities (Introduction)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Buckingham; Sociology; Law; Freedom of religion; Political science; Theme (computing); Human rights; Media studies; History","score_opus":0.017204371392293586,"score_gpt":0.2654268462365242,"score_spread":0.2482224748442306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607865436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018728541,0.05424332,0.0030230477,0.12599094,0.0036115178,0.000085837244,0.00041690873,0.000052437892,0.7938475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62144643,0.04643902,0.002212408,0.026746275,0.0041654943,0.00015851474,0.00034801537,0.00010725511,0.29837662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990669,0.0003668751,0.00002017869,0.00008966206,0.00022047224,0.00023597118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994319,0.0002382278,0.00004350524,0.000027916125,0.000103597704,0.0001547317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000864696,0.00032820948,0.0002551628,0.0010630742,0.007392527,0.0073031965,0.0007927642,0.0031197385,0.017292071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017701379,0.00023120886,0.0002586039,0.0018140795,0.0107298875,0.0057616364,0.0042707277,0.0032885687,0.00097462407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007712301,0.000014106766,0.00046678455,0.00009102572,0.0000019202873,0.00009698818,0.017501745,0.00010351411,0.000060961607,0.8827576,0.08139191,0.0175057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038097094,0.000011692014,0.0031877505,0.00055842573,0.0000027929848,0.00011699772,0.021234754,0.00009787055,0.0000545307,0.09287353,0.8818433,0.000014438783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1466821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26037434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1466821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012748218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065868353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2916566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612051069","doi":"","title":"La proclamation royale du 6 décembre 1869 (The Royal Proclamation of December 6th, 1869)","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Proclamation; Humanities; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0103040514321525,"score_gpt":0.26881022328976406,"score_spread":0.25850617185761154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612051069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23702432,0.05656352,0.002323339,0.023200264,0.0033627758,0.00014993951,0.0021918248,0.00014321513,0.6750408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6995024,0.0076826066,0.0007337397,0.0026868356,0.0005968431,0.000068578105,0.0004067906,0.00007415379,0.28824803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997964,0.00048354868,0.00012014803,0.00032053964,0.00052296545,0.000588717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990815,0.0002610462,0.00025746465,0.00007615549,0.0002464811,0.000077268574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015669588,0.00034829864,0.00025381712,0.0010577474,0.0056037144,0.0023028224,0.00066796603,0.0019275702,0.013469454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003767745,0.00030343534,0.00028109396,0.0014154615,0.004264232,0.0011418669,0.0019300699,0.0038082243,0.001923276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029756606,0.0000358268,0.005869331,0.0012546537,0.000056971872,0.0020329733,0.093908936,0.0006636599,0.0025501098,0.70223397,0.116501674,0.074594334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011058343,0.000039896488,0.027435672,0.00033953192,0.000013539601,0.00026008632,0.002854956,0.00003481649,0.00073648087,0.0016456243,0.96659386,0.00003451094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22198899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3490408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.778011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010277043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054582674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44139373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612273884","doi":"","title":"Review of Constitutional Studies Book Notes - December 2015","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Honour; Constitution; Treaty; Law; History; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03853374343892562,"score_gpt":0.368290323545758,"score_spread":0.3297565801068324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612273884","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027102823,0.7611902,0.0007397815,0.07919864,0.029085616,0.000083442574,0.0012291318,0.00009733911,0.12810484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014077796,0.71044165,0.0013183259,0.046671435,0.015973018,0.00035350298,0.0021983406,0.00021379355,0.20875213],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914396,0.0015497884,0.0004867913,0.0005360688,0.0054131374,0.00057452475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98760647,0.0034675286,0.0005261422,0.0009237263,0.0069165337,0.0005595827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072654355,0.0005115257,0.0011536661,0.0074693165,0.0027568752,0.007668258,0.0018114961,0.003490637,0.035688214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025742987,0.00065723824,0.0006321158,0.010276786,0.004199882,0.0050148317,0.0024309326,0.0034875101,0.013726477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006328757,0.000010055036,0.00008028812,0.00059146655,0.000008647433,0.000014437196,0.000102266604,0.000071111055,0.000028068229,0.05132171,0.90390897,0.043856725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027883939,0.0000018819812,0.00017596566,0.0010227693,0.0000031060183,0.000008152205,0.000062147396,0.000009381359,0.000011676982,0.002375805,0.9963219,0.000004432543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0748597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08857463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0748597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016971812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029710587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14884794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W261245","doi":"","title":"Family Homes on Reserves and Matrimonial Interests and Rights Act: A Constitutional Division of Powers Analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Federalism; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Jurisdiction; Doctrine; Interim; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02475971335948701,"score_gpt":0.32206611284208053,"score_spread":0.2973063994825935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W261245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16517569,0.004611362,0.008017997,0.02384603,0.0002624676,0.0004582854,0.001536264,0.00006346908,0.79602844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9463756,0.0017920205,0.0037127773,0.0047193533,0.00013450989,0.00020649776,0.0003728848,0.00002706177,0.04265929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902012,0.0009837896,0.00020968911,0.00069797295,0.004651001,0.0032564034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99395096,0.003000949,0.00046854696,0.00026941166,0.0018388889,0.0004712739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005754837,0.00029320476,0.00040410453,0.0031259686,0.007825606,0.010672184,0.0023536403,0.003376861,0.0071118195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011299725,0.0004186518,0.0006696255,0.0040838746,0.009309599,0.0032766294,0.0020130388,0.0053821243,0.0005424372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071359514,0.000012253693,0.001883277,0.000022631426,0.0000040369796,0.00011931947,0.0023360963,0.00019049876,0.00009288986,0.98870766,0.003105767,0.0035185167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008144323,0.00015280236,0.082292736,0.0015280112,0.00018492181,0.00046362067,0.031897858,0.0069466946,0.0017812935,0.3563842,0.51806605,0.0002203839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81793505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8738061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18206495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05740585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0743162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41651058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612860099","doi":"10.5040/9781782259725.ch-005","title":"National Paths Towards Private Ordering","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Institutionalisation; Intervention (counseling); Family law; Economic Justice; Political science; Outcome (game theory); Private law; Proposition; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Public law; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.09103296144366603,"score_gpt":0.35638343680549595,"score_spread":0.26535047536182993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612860099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34151566,0.0022622016,0.0037611441,0.026275624,0.00010382173,0.000059385497,0.00018787321,0.000051924355,0.6257823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845389,0.00048711346,0.0011461865,0.0012038898,0.000015113949,0.000022543956,0.00006620618,0.000017760754,0.0125023145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943305,0.0015616339,0.00017732076,0.00082469283,0.0011029523,0.002002907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99386793,0.0012927424,0.0006009283,0.0007475882,0.002088673,0.0014021543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050289915,0.00020387786,0.00035243458,0.0017215287,0.016105738,0.006538958,0.0008489431,0.0011189167,0.0085090175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006255092,0.00019983847,0.0003172631,0.0019027148,0.015419027,0.0043346575,0.0068063163,0.003408693,0.00038347818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020692121,0.000036849826,0.006656526,0.000031606887,0.00000775291,0.00021086869,0.04008282,0.000157846,0.00014010358,0.9292539,0.0027659743,0.020635057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003867918,0.000076289114,0.08767615,0.00053338445,0.000033879573,0.0007236239,0.10890399,0.001364791,0.000957203,0.28204829,0.5175482,0.00009548379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3332154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44214806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3332154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033050567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022287989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6625517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614061493","doi":"","title":"Reconciling Crown and Indigenous Legal Orders: The Reciprocal Benefits of Reserving an Indigenous Seat on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Supreme court; Reciprocal; Law; Political science; Crown (dentistry); Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06001522478871164,"score_gpt":0.3408741564477494,"score_spread":0.28085893165903775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614061493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15508917,0.13320388,0.0032185137,0.19989268,0.0016032177,0.000109766064,0.00026281673,0.00006506067,0.5065549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9282681,0.032147143,0.001233224,0.021958433,0.00063806435,0.00002949465,0.00005326066,0.000028685674,0.015643593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857307,0.0016955216,0.0003134665,0.0011303563,0.0070292163,0.0041006254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98563033,0.006606854,0.0007432547,0.00043541408,0.005442279,0.0011418259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009007893,0.00031488194,0.0008604127,0.0032827866,0.01818835,0.015638106,0.005519326,0.007956152,0.005063718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02811717,0.00044235785,0.00047970426,0.0051350393,0.026858326,0.0046995515,0.0048428397,0.008722703,0.00024035829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038738825,0.00005321542,0.0070219585,0.00058182137,0.00010143433,0.0005506192,0.017238993,0.0010721084,0.00026876156,0.86507756,0.032316603,0.07567822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000826411,0.00005376149,0.051955707,0.00550155,0.00066186435,0.00048283197,0.0605251,0.0024794992,0.0010579857,0.27348295,0.6034448,0.0002711949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96347725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9896561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90983295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09016704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26652572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6542107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616165810","doi":"","title":"Mutual Aid and Service Agreements: Wise Practices for First Nations Communities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Service (business); Business; Economic growth; Public relations; Political science; Marketing; Economics","score_opus":0.06283783719554008,"score_gpt":0.3151108793625628,"score_spread":0.25227304216702273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616165810","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020602277,0.0071328054,0.012964785,0.65827876,0.004401387,0.00019475604,0.00005407756,0.0003571632,0.29601404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72687936,0.0037962655,0.028348066,0.080611594,0.0012931746,0.00065520656,0.000064838234,0.00025704646,0.15809447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97768456,0.01732335,0.00040147646,0.000546202,0.002040099,0.0020042798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97295964,0.017107911,0.0012795563,0.0021904255,0.0021695627,0.00429299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027440846,0.00046655376,0.00049254677,0.0012247156,0.017377244,0.018293817,0.0012665048,0.013599781,0.014902884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040586513,0.0004884483,0.0003011031,0.0011241302,0.020627854,0.0118814185,0.012159415,0.010730221,0.0013465893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012898038,0.000049333492,0.00050545903,0.00009570308,0.0000050931285,0.00020508902,0.031846736,0.00022222367,0.00027443902,0.8106801,0.11453094,0.041572087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013818473,0.000026213627,0.0010651875,0.000542394,0.000005797803,0.00016340421,0.045346256,0.00034464512,0.00029438632,0.2186767,0.73348063,0.00004060426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008058968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02369509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99194103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005059727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030523295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14512283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616335932","doi":"","title":"From Moore to More: How the Social Model of Disability May Be Applied to Build More Inclusive and Accessible Education Systems","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Social model of disability; Inclusion (mineral); Special education; Order (exchange); Foundation (evidence); Education Act; Political science; Law; Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Social science; Business","score_opus":0.022220448833650857,"score_gpt":0.34000462729355885,"score_spread":0.317784178459908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616335932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049428128,0.002689009,0.01567573,0.27265942,0.0007246075,0.00013828077,0.000057458485,0.00011798546,0.6585093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8917322,0.0017169302,0.00937937,0.043312665,0.00024198674,0.00014693149,0.000042416752,0.00009313846,0.053334318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98761,0.0046347356,0.00022464083,0.0009443627,0.0029891715,0.0035970202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958191,0.0014339758,0.00023835817,0.00040126202,0.0008409963,0.001266299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010207257,0.00074006227,0.00072973943,0.0028211905,0.026656777,0.018231262,0.0023692101,0.00781492,0.005809848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009437404,0.00045123792,0.00087984605,0.0015921965,0.072064035,0.013399057,0.014307727,0.010621509,0.000530144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035233545,0.00001058525,0.00027617466,0.000011600439,0.0000038869575,0.00013728105,0.010290891,0.00024049246,0.000053339223,0.9820753,0.0036847545,0.003212207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026055599,0.000028202929,0.0012182823,0.00021165758,0.000019851681,0.00017590157,0.02525135,0.000986907,0.0002583212,0.7744599,0.19730258,0.00006108861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71468365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8080209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71468365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05996859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08527993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5739932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2617488593","doi":"","title":"Sexual Orientation and Legal Rights in Canada: A Chronological Overview","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Orientation (vector space); Political science; Business; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04148150355390763,"score_gpt":0.31095513178070266,"score_spread":0.26947362822679505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2617488593","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19868782,0.6417916,0.0010910783,0.045043547,0.0012147794,0.00025033485,0.0031000283,0.000060682407,0.10876016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4822648,0.48429203,0.0018435352,0.0050876066,0.000485488,0.00011583441,0.0011614054,0.00005560733,0.024693767],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841714,0.00015822315,0.00008222785,0.0001168845,0.0005357212,0.00068978535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954072,0.0007941797,0.00037018154,0.000052336836,0.0022359204,0.0011401372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013158952,0.0004939992,0.00063021673,0.013616238,0.013506369,0.00900871,0.0014655195,0.001764008,0.0063609625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033338477,0.00052546087,0.0005300465,0.03230172,0.0065553156,0.0026448357,0.0021263568,0.0028645396,0.0002365234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020823108,0.00040313497,0.13725497,0.0032746196,0.00010915773,0.001736551,0.092358254,0.0012876622,0.0007946284,0.26361293,0.07857087,0.42038897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021181066,0.00006731303,0.3672714,0.003592059,0.000105531784,0.00093449093,0.0859931,0.00045616718,0.0002715117,0.00907424,0.53206664,0.00014641177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99685514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12387996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12387996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23220083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8988162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619029461","doi":"","title":"Law and Mental Health: A Relationship in Crisis? (Introduction)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Economics; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.015774285328702804,"score_gpt":0.31188239880670643,"score_spread":0.29610811347800364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619029461","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012304358,0.29094046,0.0009756867,0.4965043,0.08338435,0.00015951473,0.0003686936,0.00007786846,0.12635866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032938957,0.22073828,0.0015939414,0.32274088,0.171499,0.00039931486,0.00050507643,0.00021167072,0.24937296],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879164,0.00047708512,0.000034850524,0.000101830825,0.00029954183,0.00029503347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985253,0.0006799496,0.000056971727,0.000032584616,0.00029936119,0.00040572812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013990772,0.0013574103,0.00086164416,0.0021280635,0.006082262,0.007042343,0.001898966,0.0077496856,0.020691367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025392552,0.0004922863,0.0005212737,0.0018487734,0.008159903,0.0058313822,0.0038898718,0.009045637,0.0040173177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000098590435,0.000029345909,0.0001539422,0.00018630666,0.000003129869,0.00014307888,0.002858437,0.00005327858,0.00007641243,0.051412635,0.92852634,0.016547183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047028084,0.000015805623,0.001372211,0.0005872779,0.0000024026904,0.00020868289,0.0033793673,0.000052204316,0.00001639703,0.016262736,0.9780847,0.000013431058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1640876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3066436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1640876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015604378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010275214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32626498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619583301","doi":"10.7202/1073015ar","title":"Rethinking the Archetypal Conversation: How Seriously? In What Directions? Who Does the Thinking?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Communication; Philosophy","score_opus":0.048004041784288014,"score_gpt":0.2890501549153711,"score_spread":0.2410461131310831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619583301","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070104008,0.008014082,0.009166904,0.89540803,0.0042459853,0.00001866143,0.00003323449,0.00003627621,0.076066345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66851383,0.008018073,0.0079641165,0.26203406,0.00675803,0.00015932144,0.000050353225,0.0004632713,0.046038933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9816436,0.013777269,0.00035239797,0.0011817105,0.001802544,0.0012424939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9721982,0.02193726,0.0006226904,0.0012414156,0.0025711178,0.0014293486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0218907,0.0006833711,0.0011673304,0.001797853,0.013574346,0.023517357,0.002758261,0.011572852,0.0059989933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03324666,0.00045173182,0.0005430647,0.0017671561,0.0757245,0.04840824,0.010126256,0.03431502,0.0013013477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011577207,0.000011706316,0.00013777801,0.000052789088,0.00000604595,0.00005362551,0.0475226,0.000045525965,0.00010398502,0.92025536,0.02485758,0.0069413283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007688806,0.000008390621,0.00021597698,0.0003626467,0.000007755018,0.000048737427,0.08229726,0.0002608546,0.00019876345,0.70181435,0.21475302,0.000024578265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010258876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013345859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023517357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010208399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011107642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11577046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620313501","doi":"","title":"Uneasy Partners: Multiculturalism and Rights in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Religious studies; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03337593436744646,"score_gpt":0.3143858105787556,"score_spread":0.28100987621130913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620313501","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041721918,0.014741903,0.0012177594,0.036797605,0.0005833564,0.00006019542,0.00021422369,0.000041325966,0.9046217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52284116,0.011657395,0.00090904173,0.00394159,0.00010294197,0.00005369382,0.000109415334,0.00008069581,0.46030405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997973,0.0001993331,0.00002833939,0.00014038364,0.0007745294,0.00088444375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985538,0.00029873062,0.00005040541,0.00004989472,0.0004433479,0.0006039337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011246284,0.0005124198,0.00056556804,0.0016648029,0.032114286,0.014778137,0.0019076266,0.0034635242,0.016365532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026789338,0.0004675301,0.0003309109,0.0049034115,0.01437468,0.0039561703,0.0039350707,0.0059979297,0.0006464275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012768667,0.000023490145,0.0012948407,0.00003301811,0.000004954476,0.00024709394,0.02803567,0.00029592525,0.00006480149,0.877544,0.06222691,0.030216511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017868862,0.00001208149,0.0064499825,0.00035763587,0.000019316518,0.0002763062,0.07089904,0.0006459979,0.00020635061,0.10646011,0.81458014,0.00007514668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99566615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99833053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11906382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11906382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22351111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8638725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620765319","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1257","title":"Small Claims Court: A Vehicle for Social Change and the Case for Equitable Relief","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Appeal; Grassroots; Legislature; Political science; Law; Scope (computer science); Debt; Public administration; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.1706944303902091,"score_gpt":0.40060602750015883,"score_spread":0.22991159710994974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620765319","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037659243,0.003878144,0.010647313,0.57859373,0.00099514,0.00010314005,0.00004794313,0.000057175246,0.36801818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.880827,0.0015884872,0.0026498467,0.050213303,0.0008321399,0.00012812948,0.000030808373,0.000065204156,0.06366508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98031086,0.007355041,0.00042026766,0.0017109857,0.0059225718,0.0042803553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865333,0.005975999,0.00086538907,0.0011950572,0.0022867327,0.0031435173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019569032,0.0002927612,0.00047643296,0.0012226583,0.026044546,0.016128505,0.0030892747,0.011977062,0.009080767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033128217,0.00040142096,0.00044351915,0.0011073775,0.061584722,0.009784587,0.011363696,0.011936396,0.00063142786],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006580243,0.000009556691,0.00051378255,0.000013697255,0.0000029130838,0.00021466239,0.0064311945,0.000102050195,0.00008208139,0.96989125,0.016140735,0.0065913447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003800524,0.000028330607,0.003162436,0.00031069943,0.000013883343,0.00030673968,0.01612894,0.00096496736,0.0002004202,0.5100177,0.46877345,0.00005450857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38844413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50965464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38844413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03920503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06623937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7723663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621262196","doi":"","title":"Backpedalling after Ward: The Impact of Henry v. British Columbia (Attorney General) on the Charter Damages Framework","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Damages; Supreme court; Law; Confusion; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.02311741119014229,"score_gpt":0.3059605236369586,"score_spread":0.2828431124468163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621262196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15901929,0.015157404,0.0012843842,0.28259304,0.0020217658,0.000105895015,0.00038643985,0.000052283787,0.5393796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8313494,0.0040600277,0.0005365897,0.103597514,0.0005001194,0.00005539923,0.00006971601,0.00006628568,0.059765052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839968,0.003160301,0.00023470438,0.0011569809,0.0051620835,0.006289107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98985404,0.00461585,0.00051631546,0.0003298692,0.0028848618,0.0017990205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076694335,0.00042114974,0.0008556911,0.0017414511,0.03111381,0.019039985,0.00312478,0.011876488,0.0063325632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022113876,0.0006023642,0.0005555477,0.0024754086,0.021520708,0.003934404,0.006519521,0.020270277,0.00044168954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009681901,0.00006031406,0.0053765336,0.00008669435,0.000044555967,0.0016496743,0.01944292,0.001318707,0.00039533264,0.84986585,0.103588216,0.018074444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016568134,0.00013351547,0.04382334,0.0018712977,0.00026803682,0.00045509412,0.06518304,0.0018925591,0.0014104532,0.18433613,0.6997784,0.0006824736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97645444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9873093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09433793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09433793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11779799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6844728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622143654","doi":"","title":"No Place Like Home: The Search for a Legal Framework for Cohabitants and the Family Home in Canada and Britain","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Law; History","score_opus":0.023173096851629438,"score_gpt":0.2993639666232105,"score_spread":0.2761908697715811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622143654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89919895,0.004665004,0.00061385706,0.019721009,0.0001450989,0.00008153232,0.00020495815,0.000010329051,0.07535918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99413717,0.0009003263,0.00021568671,0.0006617642,0.000008688659,0.000019688878,0.000036390993,0.000011391212,0.004008948],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950605,0.0012000853,0.00012146009,0.000270132,0.0007490854,0.0025986556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99167573,0.002064626,0.0005006008,0.00022419948,0.0024295612,0.0031051724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036496834,0.00030495762,0.00091447996,0.0029521596,0.039864793,0.012061948,0.003929819,0.0025335154,0.008198666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012256881,0.00047344144,0.00045236974,0.006360924,0.020791467,0.0034638678,0.007957842,0.0051985285,0.00020540782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017535787,0.0001354717,0.050259735,0.0002088568,0.000029758672,0.0014596639,0.62432957,0.0005689723,0.00024598974,0.270181,0.010653936,0.041751713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020610783,0.000019358698,0.0478058,0.0004641586,0.000028583221,0.00015288811,0.91803294,0.00038712207,0.00008563782,0.00653702,0.026407003,0.000058821814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.997101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12569438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12569438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20247768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9119808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622179869","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2017.20810","title":"L’avenir de la présomption de paternité : comparaisons franco-québécoises","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.0463018400249588,"score_gpt":0.3390780308374323,"score_spread":0.2927761908124735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622179869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9621638,0.0016721349,0.00021474496,0.0020834887,0.000029484927,0.000010982381,0.000275222,0.0000029779885,0.03354707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99200916,0.00041624912,0.000047856454,0.00023553392,0.0000058330183,0.000005841909,0.0000860116,0.00000399469,0.0071895756],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998565,0.00033398057,0.000031036663,0.00015606206,0.00030632905,0.00060765416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964928,0.00093015895,0.00051586516,0.00014928057,0.0012784734,0.0006334247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017316681,0.00021132125,0.00036863462,0.0015832854,0.006230771,0.0032358724,0.00082224765,0.0009810746,0.010230011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034045258,0.00016854632,0.00022814485,0.002990481,0.0043927077,0.0014970867,0.0014538822,0.0012126565,0.0003251623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039957554,0.000074833326,0.5062,0.00015798508,0.00018941655,0.0011144266,0.3698796,0.00047112178,0.0012041514,0.057054915,0.0075221793,0.055731937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072119997,0.00004286926,0.76714015,0.00021486019,0.000038135582,0.00016858637,0.1956291,0.00025981505,0.00018365755,0.0007645819,0.035504527,0.00004643493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96552616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9865997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034473836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01869093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014007663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13561279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624342807","doi":"","title":"Le mariage entre personnes de même sexe","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.03541616535378129,"score_gpt":0.27643486176875676,"score_spread":0.24101869641497548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2624342807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804952,0.006291023,0.00015001908,0.0013710561,0.000079513615,0.000008684562,0.00043642457,0.0000033629178,0.011164747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99569905,0.0011823805,0.00008121002,0.00013681292,0.000015605012,0.000017996475,0.00010806251,0.0000047205567,0.0027542764],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791056,0.0009798674,0.000118429765,0.00020031897,0.00040222902,0.00038859964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714893,0.0010716562,0.0009608275,0.0001093367,0.00039761604,0.00031170572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001623174,0.00017883859,0.00041495368,0.0022199664,0.002421628,0.0020804408,0.0004582976,0.000674115,0.0038549863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008642911,0.00024592876,0.00045789915,0.0025032952,0.0013773383,0.0018344608,0.002385123,0.00106036,0.00031871948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037405547,0.00007844252,0.762263,0.00018960718,0.00029622085,0.0005774768,0.19239953,0.000110863126,0.0006188903,0.01102731,0.002685153,0.029379565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063675993,0.00007178718,0.8872249,0.00021286074,0.000051731426,0.00057910266,0.09424682,0.000044626333,0.0001594834,0.00051312643,0.016867056,0.000022109425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.091454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10314641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001997335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012542325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18184334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625095744","doi":"","title":"Mother? A Portrait of Legal Motherhood in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Portrait; Genealogy; Gender studies; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; History; Art history","score_opus":0.016390112153484165,"score_gpt":0.25196781028643034,"score_spread":0.23557769813294618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625095744","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18958402,0.018792208,0.002372475,0.060680054,0.00068951136,0.000102013146,0.0010288617,0.000073838164,0.72667706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91585326,0.0120141525,0.0012689758,0.0032527181,0.00006656501,0.00003629134,0.00024187622,0.000055399843,0.06721074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986431,0.00020879191,0.000022734232,0.00010261325,0.00043258604,0.0005901016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991671,0.00014267596,0.00006342992,0.000020189338,0.00031380798,0.0002926926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064026355,0.00028851096,0.00030542084,0.0019586624,0.021879684,0.005009277,0.001287349,0.0011727052,0.0052568065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012836355,0.00016794795,0.00026700864,0.0040427633,0.008027688,0.0011552101,0.0019714471,0.002384118,0.0004428312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003701523,0.000022461407,0.014074924,0.0001349642,0.000012429092,0.0029812248,0.37361124,0.00046578303,0.0005843705,0.5029671,0.05117649,0.05393199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061132296,0.000014156353,0.030554812,0.00040125372,0.000018599518,0.00093751075,0.22592047,0.0004943445,0.00018705492,0.012280641,0.72913116,0.000053937565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99453187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99708086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09398904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09398904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11012713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6819414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625641434","doi":"","title":"The Justification of Rights Infringements: Section 1 of the Charter","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Section (typography); Democracy; Law and economics; Law; Morality; Human rights; State (computer science); Politics; Proportionality (law); Interpretation (philosophy); Action (physics); Relevance (law); Sociology; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.013043046877035136,"score_gpt":0.27600258978668185,"score_spread":0.26295954290964674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625641434","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008629193,0.007290205,0.047065917,0.046222977,0.0016696288,0.0002451394,0.00037841848,0.00011750965,0.88838094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68390095,0.0073324777,0.0441033,0.02817821,0.002080041,0.00076738285,0.0004309273,0.0002328044,0.23297392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865471,0.0038112733,0.00035517686,0.0011622241,0.0057729245,0.0023513762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946456,0.0024658456,0.00030648045,0.0004749996,0.001860584,0.0002464604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01046922,0.00058178575,0.0008086813,0.0016543785,0.008633911,0.010115986,0.0024548103,0.007623926,0.0063161748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016033525,0.0004835738,0.00068194175,0.0016898739,0.03156845,0.005289175,0.0026247057,0.008433488,0.0009734951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013662038,0.0000012590957,0.000025690808,0.0000062278814,3.9003254e-7,0.000008305041,0.00030842779,0.000057766294,0.000015225786,0.9952152,0.0032279748,0.0011320768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008672665,0.000016013293,0.00065177784,0.00024285576,0.000008712905,0.00006956216,0.0006289058,0.00070633483,0.00028163084,0.7068215,0.290519,0.00004502253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43349156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38602582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5665084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027008818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042728588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8619367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626175647","doi":"","title":"The Answer, Not the Problem: An Examination of the Role of Aboriginal Rights in Securing a Liberal Foundation for the Legitimacy of the Canadian State","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Foundation (evidence); State (computer science); Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.016441841162745368,"score_gpt":0.3418191171153787,"score_spread":0.3253772759526333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626175647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13368148,0.0074588964,0.0028911575,0.18738079,0.00025547622,0.000079863734,0.00011617534,0.00003067772,0.6681055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9641721,0.0040713167,0.0012396168,0.0056241904,0.00010397393,0.000024321329,0.000028068636,0.000028359445,0.024708014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621695,0.000978631,0.000041161053,0.00022325148,0.0011281909,0.0014117251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958215,0.0020197285,0.00020415084,0.00016970228,0.0013319971,0.00045294073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048419232,0.00028593253,0.0004063596,0.0022944347,0.019788668,0.0114294,0.0016905174,0.0024194724,0.00444835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008129206,0.0002275301,0.0004523262,0.003019719,0.043804765,0.0057027405,0.0030375507,0.00446322,0.00025738188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001484159,0.000010549163,0.0020317705,0.000081909006,0.0000064095975,0.0001616818,0.05539023,0.00018684597,0.00016744547,0.92275214,0.007852399,0.011343659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024208712,0.000030218182,0.028232267,0.00076276925,0.000066442764,0.00020247286,0.3003699,0.0015051193,0.00049229537,0.3507498,0.3174909,0.00007360592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94788194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9708275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06534619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06534619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09663784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.474122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626233521","doi":"","title":"Musings and Silences of Chief Justice William Osgoode: Digest Marginalia about the Reception of Imperial Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Knight; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Political science; Marginalia; Legal history; Art; Philosophy; Literature","score_opus":0.020617239474643282,"score_gpt":0.31439133429722055,"score_spread":0.29377409482257727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626233521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38082767,0.015410535,0.0019050344,0.23390447,0.0020882143,0.00004015986,0.00011344847,0.00013113608,0.36557937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9612488,0.0012956071,0.00015454751,0.008327077,0.00021967241,0.000010427087,0.000013380743,0.000081340986,0.028649116],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601376,0.0017182553,0.00007749508,0.0003233541,0.0009818964,0.0008851605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910614,0.0056215674,0.00047824462,0.0003190696,0.0015082816,0.0010115324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045477455,0.00034849148,0.00045099325,0.0013368903,0.033792824,0.010527273,0.0012258406,0.0036143283,0.0036334153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018150298,0.0004069843,0.00016885775,0.0014501059,0.045198984,0.005341143,0.0052565145,0.0075329,0.0004330261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004753049,0.0000075128814,0.00069226633,0.000038082457,0.000006010156,0.000490244,0.83700883,0.000034866232,0.00059017923,0.11934974,0.032832805,0.008902008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066553375,0.000012473083,0.0020717434,0.00015685306,0.000008558443,0.00021474197,0.3985847,0.000068950634,0.0007154429,0.010855152,0.58725965,0.000045143875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5262918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6403043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4737082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027328627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013962583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95299596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W263163414","doi":"10.1177/003172170508600918","title":"Under the Rainbow","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Phi Delta Kappan","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Sexual orientation; Law; Salary; Pension; Government (linguistics); Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.05449571599086503,"score_gpt":0.3385752982872361,"score_spread":0.2840795822963711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W263163414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028225752,0.011846824,0.0034674325,0.2903344,0.029928727,0.00005192198,0.00028738528,0.00045158423,0.66080916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05132925,0.006311498,0.0020390134,0.14565244,0.0075646415,0.00007908393,0.00023327248,0.0007965021,0.78599435],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949167,0.0012263883,0.00011307756,0.0009535885,0.0013709991,0.0014193177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99610764,0.0004939776,0.00016411544,0.00055981666,0.001027014,0.0016474017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044499934,0.0008465431,0.00076083845,0.001282455,0.01925666,0.015966905,0.0017193371,0.0060369777,0.13587576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011459962,0.00044414637,0.00068245217,0.0008693505,0.015368912,0.015579294,0.015187201,0.015905974,0.047356844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022357777,0.00002343953,0.0003064045,0.000031087267,0.000005457825,0.00014901438,0.0025458091,0.00002744813,0.00008011653,0.24275678,0.7253696,0.028682634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028453348,0.0000055066907,0.00010740307,0.00006959932,0.0000012800637,0.00006513816,0.0013831224,0.000015845777,0.000026065516,0.015249617,0.9830667,0.0000069330913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013560759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02643176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13587576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005667903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0096845245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45454973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W263684723","doi":"","title":"Questions of Right and Left or Right and Wrong: A Disability-Ethics Analysis of the Right-Wing and Left-Wing Media Portrayals of the Latimer Case.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Reverence; Sociology; Praxis; Politics; Right wing; Law; Aesthetics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036299268487666486,"score_gpt":0.33842386409647124,"score_spread":0.3021245956088048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W263684723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20995687,0.003154439,0.0026823739,0.07324477,0.0003289867,0.000025441244,0.000033055174,0.000017176297,0.71055686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98396415,0.00049535383,0.00018061278,0.0035672996,0.00016215352,0.000021191252,0.00000766655,0.000012907697,0.011588766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99234265,0.0048904936,0.00009490795,0.00028593704,0.0012272991,0.0011586837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99081415,0.007345073,0.00081105565,0.0002628348,0.00047067206,0.00029620127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032888395,0.00035143105,0.00022553094,0.0025626486,0.0138184205,0.009267155,0.0009635129,0.0056399344,0.0043401187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011599981,0.00017798749,0.00020978927,0.0011308285,0.027249327,0.0056876354,0.0053282264,0.0040999427,0.00040548795],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036179692,0.00002337024,0.0012457437,0.00003720448,0.0000032995733,0.0012733212,0.19536749,0.00005213623,0.00033337434,0.7869208,0.007144043,0.007563049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020646203,0.000038435075,0.005542167,0.0007329414,0.000021112566,0.0019202515,0.5067435,0.0005062837,0.0018432384,0.13561086,0.34696594,0.000054635177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02307527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027663607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02307527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005594677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018700548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045881927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W264711944","doi":"","title":"Rolle's Ego Dormio in Manuscript Trinity College Dublin 155 (1). (Linguistics)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia Anglica Posnaniensia: international review of English Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Extant taxon; Id, ego and super-ego; Classics; Watson; Biography; Quarter (Canadian coin); History; Art; Literature; Philosophy; Art history; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03775751814888563,"score_gpt":0.3540115424552449,"score_spread":0.3162540243063593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W264711944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014476896,0.020701384,0.00091360824,0.015348242,0.017889949,0.000116468385,0.0031176761,0.0005096018,0.9399555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019102726,0.007288192,0.00055059587,0.002213211,0.0034525401,0.00013538283,0.0015011674,0.00079872983,0.9649575],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993813,0.00015622168,0.00003640879,0.00013746668,0.00022172218,0.00006685931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994097,0.0001333088,0.000046285684,0.00006435697,0.00024464843,0.000101712474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008120125,0.0006985026,0.0005350255,0.0024407452,0.0028209141,0.004521138,0.0007469759,0.00083498965,0.18489586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021867133,0.0004307749,0.0002438912,0.0021114864,0.0018144161,0.0020369058,0.002225689,0.0016589423,0.08477544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001033204,0.000007879453,0.00008886536,0.00010513184,0.0000012333497,0.000039848823,0.0012389331,0.000018484032,0.000082364124,0.01767871,0.96250737,0.01822086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.027677e-7,0.0000016952418,0.00021342674,0.00006168976,3.2454014e-7,0.000020324142,0.00020810115,0.0000045810266,0.000015770598,0.00044721473,0.9990243,0.0000017512477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017677521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03103142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18489586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045407806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025321096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61853826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2651661903","doi":"10.1515/9782763712680-005","title":"Question Identitaire. Le Droit et la Philosophiejuridique Libérale: Réflexion Sur le Fond du Droit Autochtone Canadien","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02579775297448438,"score_gpt":0.27678467441378884,"score_spread":0.25098692143930446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2651661903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011911746,0.04024194,0.0039261538,0.18246406,0.0019587814,0.00002318213,0.00011386837,0.000026297319,0.7593341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6813148,0.018467681,0.001801141,0.030407432,0.0033842002,0.00016111124,0.00013787896,0.00014430133,0.2641814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668044,0.0016518795,0.000082403494,0.0005497185,0.0005819689,0.0004534791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970925,0.0019862053,0.00020134711,0.000220784,0.0003455384,0.00015367547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037646643,0.00047116246,0.00078787684,0.001868334,0.00926473,0.0136516215,0.0015031963,0.010160954,0.014160759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057134815,0.00047518095,0.00052902923,0.0030550533,0.0394933,0.01500425,0.005316286,0.0113819195,0.0016453994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019806819,0.000003075884,0.000023255297,0.000009777769,5.576624e-7,0.000012050995,0.0025097276,0.000011104089,0.000010335669,0.9927511,0.003445581,0.0012213974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001140883,0.000005253943,0.0002957991,0.00024499465,0.0000046445675,0.000072025134,0.0067889257,0.00008605117,0.00007068527,0.7289466,0.26346368,0.000009896333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033242505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030208189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9667575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013102089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009653513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09506279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W265248637","doi":"","title":"An opportunity for grace in the Anglican Communion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Sociology; Commit; Constructive; Polity; Law; CONTEST; Theology; Philosophy; Process (computing); Political science; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.13395966542412793,"score_gpt":0.42322621680747435,"score_spread":0.28926655138334645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W265248637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21712725,0.026406141,0.008041045,0.2875094,0.022435967,0.00018587781,0.00013591585,0.00034310468,0.43781537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92070425,0.0019649866,0.0019970336,0.016879978,0.0024332516,0.00010367423,0.000032659773,0.00022078307,0.055663384],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837568,0.012546887,0.00026856334,0.00057828124,0.0011287018,0.0017208138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907126,0.0039109015,0.0007907447,0.0010020431,0.0011449767,0.0024387392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0104438,0.0006379882,0.00061726064,0.0008051371,0.029307932,0.013509158,0.0010881511,0.0038525243,0.0028962574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013724754,0.0007004998,0.00034059296,0.00041509292,0.043005634,0.0091400845,0.011190661,0.011199148,0.0010361653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051649196,0.000031839485,0.0007005946,0.00007560619,0.000006505884,0.0011415323,0.7334647,0.000047523063,0.00029937955,0.19671568,0.056698788,0.010766251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009451122,0.000048853268,0.00096197525,0.00033857828,0.0000060330367,0.0007314359,0.425258,0.00006353549,0.00029446898,0.02114372,0.55109656,0.000047432604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009230744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021929668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029307932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005168172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052465308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055232763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W265832125","doi":"","title":"\"Fourth\" Guessing the Spirit: Critical Reflections on Contemporary Global Anglicanism from an Indigenous Laywoman","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humility; Worship; Indigenous; Faith; Sociology; Identity (music); Religious studies; Ecclesiology; Theology; Law; Political science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.18138572626061966,"score_gpt":0.4578406157499846,"score_spread":0.2764548894893649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W265832125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54630154,0.13161679,0.0027495867,0.12496,0.0051295757,0.00020353522,0.00007121771,0.00005185327,0.1889159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93657845,0.021333324,0.0006266485,0.013419396,0.0007002038,0.00009585509,0.000020355486,0.000055667246,0.02717025],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941749,0.0046942774,0.00010277894,0.00023683645,0.0003271636,0.0004639948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960424,0.0027123187,0.0002759787,0.000116906005,0.0005812104,0.00027123248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007350045,0.00069043785,0.0007534806,0.002179408,0.01590245,0.0088046435,0.0014558329,0.0031733147,0.0021007604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005626422,0.000411459,0.0003111434,0.0015271483,0.022662856,0.003794807,0.0044612056,0.006483691,0.0003275768],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015329597,0.000011571994,0.0003229342,0.00021443715,0.000006466308,0.0009713815,0.96147215,0.00001741739,0.00015196882,0.029107813,0.003677555,0.004030979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036607578,0.000022727898,0.0006456473,0.0005451864,0.000012343835,0.00043911862,0.9015898,0.000018226641,0.00019403278,0.0021055965,0.09441298,0.000010732726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024388919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055575863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024388919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008651859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061506014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06277388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W265884658","doi":"","title":"Review Article: The Charter and Poverty: Beyond Injusticiability","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Charter; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Political science; Adjudication; Law; Law and economics; Legitimacy; Poverty; Human rights; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.015715691362669742,"score_gpt":0.3050559447937341,"score_spread":0.28934025343106434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W265884658","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011633124,0.9767343,0.00012643254,0.0073509063,0.0046142098,0.000022725508,0.00014673133,0.000012985196,0.010875463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013857648,0.9847861,0.00010334896,0.0044779605,0.0041147405,0.0000175632,0.00014121199,0.0000072792404,0.0049659973],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998965,0.00024871383,0.000096149524,0.00019804324,0.0003758032,0.00011627948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828964,0.0007746267,0.00020013725,0.000059123453,0.00052462495,0.00015181735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091314776,0.0012197823,0.0025475223,0.0031742123,0.0009668105,0.005835776,0.002387273,0.0054367995,0.039216246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035837747,0.00041828916,0.0008832146,0.0082122525,0.0018973732,0.0040494464,0.0016946065,0.0043821055,0.010817903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005424216,0.000082918545,0.00028523334,0.03499915,0.000118785414,0.00024525207,0.00027563705,0.00045045436,0.00032563767,0.024908457,0.640778,0.29747635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008487127,0.000016493226,0.0005732361,0.006859734,0.00003780925,0.00015066909,0.000169328,0.00003372096,0.000030543943,0.0022294456,0.9898779,0.000012680176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012722097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019169021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039216246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002503626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068136505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13119143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W266230057","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1221","title":"Law and Feminism: Foreword","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03239107060682715,"score_gpt":0.3214021946588765,"score_spread":0.2890111240520493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W266230057","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006218716,0.2803909,0.00039970074,0.4172452,0.2385981,0.000032940643,0.00013895457,0.000036404705,0.062535875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02108094,0.16762237,0.0005396779,0.27015802,0.38053253,0.00015661071,0.00022135055,0.0002874055,0.15940121],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989365,0.00035030514,0.000074539974,0.00014806268,0.00035798672,0.00013263093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99554425,0.0028063531,0.0001745945,0.00016875606,0.0009494118,0.0003566833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002056288,0.00095775194,0.0013787524,0.0024144955,0.005695123,0.009880653,0.0014317272,0.012488593,0.027326459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005923405,0.00053313613,0.00046728685,0.0033432406,0.0068888455,0.009930481,0.0036066656,0.012950915,0.008758092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015321322,0.000017908564,0.0000467296,0.00027705933,0.0000048901707,0.0000480217,0.00065077597,0.000018971814,0.000084959385,0.049803797,0.93020093,0.018830698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007162847,0.000010560058,0.00036484998,0.0009781735,0.000007743687,0.00006567212,0.0010621831,0.000018083736,0.00004208486,0.015572493,0.9818621,0.000008794754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012721522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021136263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027326459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047309394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005515569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09141612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2724249194","doi":"","title":"Written Brief on Bill C-337, an Act to Amend the Judges Act and the Criminal Code (Sexual Assault). Submitted to the Status of Women Committee of the House of Commons, Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Criminal code; House of Representatives; Sexual assault; Law; Code (set theory); Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Criminal law; Medicine; Legislature; Computer science; Parliament; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Environmental health; Politics; Programming language","score_opus":0.02569968436546979,"score_gpt":0.300956659327963,"score_spread":0.27525697496249324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2724249194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036112433,0.0071759652,0.0016197255,0.40749124,0.06351451,0.0031688227,0.017917953,0.000798043,0.49470246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0057084616,0.002112696,0.0008065467,0.13349465,0.006767755,0.00070821476,0.0022600894,0.00017131722,0.8479703],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997412,0.00049356936,0.00017736416,0.00020216544,0.0011909888,0.00052377395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99193996,0.0029541908,0.00034872637,0.00016488155,0.003922208,0.0006700819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002839519,0.000874159,0.0007990466,0.0018759462,0.0070812013,0.0033963188,0.0017719294,0.01232816,0.13589257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01219762,0.0011273286,0.00063837867,0.0013026487,0.0012466818,0.0019606722,0.001327222,0.007288126,0.049635403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069348202,0.000009247102,0.00002706692,0.00001330383,4.4932636e-7,0.000019905947,0.00003710149,0.0000110906385,0.000048764246,0.0006198928,0.99783605,0.0013701526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002682518,0.000024509773,0.0021642332,0.00014858735,0.000003908734,0.00003142666,0.00038403977,0.00006510086,0.00009729887,0.0010605402,0.99596965,0.00002388016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1776891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40240145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8223109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006966668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01937019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45460594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W272733908","doi":"","title":"What's Wrong with Social and Economic Rights?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Social rights; Constitution; Human rights; Political science; Democracy; Law and economics; Judicial restraint; Law; Judicial review; Judicial activism; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.011028038115456563,"score_gpt":0.2736194586194604,"score_spread":0.26259142050400386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W272733908","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009092194,0.009377837,0.00212747,0.8007403,0.0021614975,0.000014427521,0.00009378284,0.000035897825,0.17635666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7738392,0.013126751,0.0021974747,0.17279807,0.0037851366,0.000055554447,0.0000964849,0.00009010654,0.034011222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98540175,0.0031463862,0.00027933973,0.0013622002,0.0056570643,0.004153246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99028546,0.0038199513,0.0005872007,0.00070825464,0.003249187,0.0013499223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010626936,0.00052432716,0.001030323,0.002365442,0.018443618,0.015939498,0.0029628992,0.0109957075,0.00614154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022024242,0.00029347633,0.00082076347,0.003421073,0.09564138,0.014931935,0.0043082847,0.012436159,0.0007573629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006216339,0.000010498184,0.0005274924,0.000034648983,0.000011686066,0.000058954294,0.003473419,0.00007466956,0.000028600694,0.96919584,0.015391554,0.011186396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022951881,0.000012983181,0.0038708886,0.0005577919,0.000025880983,0.000103549704,0.016582772,0.00022502444,0.0001664685,0.75164163,0.2267419,0.000048100097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78788745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7534384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78788745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039378744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049063955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42672342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2728765329","doi":"","title":"Reimagining the White Wedding: Lesbian Weddings in Ontario, Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Lesbian; Art; Gender studies; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.023810073760488215,"score_gpt":0.26683335174770656,"score_spread":0.24302327798721834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2728765329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9666367,0.00071697205,0.00011906944,0.006067589,0.00014514627,0.000046997196,0.0003461368,0.000011137081,0.02591014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96898276,0.0007413625,0.00015262114,0.0009146707,0.000019383237,0.000022227207,0.00015368867,0.000025032321,0.02898815],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984786,0.00024733113,0.00002999789,0.00010147256,0.0002944388,0.00084810785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99485517,0.00042154168,0.0003758235,0.00012320133,0.0015552453,0.0026689554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016115776,0.00025075322,0.0004276437,0.0010227925,0.032974914,0.0058065,0.0017713291,0.0016058298,0.009172976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003530006,0.00037329082,0.00026098546,0.0020222361,0.0037276878,0.0016085536,0.0034016618,0.0033095477,0.00044826732],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031645724,0.00017330656,0.12747498,0.00011421974,0.000030270818,0.0013932593,0.8031614,0.00016408991,0.00093958405,0.008097555,0.027365794,0.030769063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000085793,0.000029892028,0.14318205,0.00013162945,0.000011919292,0.00009191619,0.79124963,0.000097671335,0.00015865632,0.00022950783,0.06477413,0.00003440125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079068854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.079068854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12306314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5736874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W272909804","doi":"","title":"Quality v. equality: the divided court in Chaoulli v. Quebec.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Legislation; Jurisdiction","score_opus":0.08115706378064698,"score_gpt":0.3317319427195077,"score_spread":0.2505748789388607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W272909804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030811552,0.025474567,0.0018167698,0.39733496,0.0026133354,0.00024092908,0.0013075529,0.000091688686,0.5403086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6586303,0.00505923,0.000902774,0.1900193,0.0010374804,0.00022577163,0.00034541826,0.000078300836,0.14370133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99085546,0.0014885681,0.00015734263,0.00094762415,0.0024973142,0.004053762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950347,0.0019334038,0.00023338853,0.0001738069,0.0015711889,0.0010534539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064175585,0.0005414896,0.00053933513,0.0016710113,0.036420193,0.015450875,0.0036241417,0.018816749,0.013009012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011487024,0.00069930154,0.00078461773,0.0025659818,0.016903888,0.0044648373,0.003686984,0.015381655,0.0007060533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034387886,0.000021608743,0.0019768,0.000061411636,0.000016167523,0.000772911,0.00578074,0.0003187372,0.00014287213,0.77598286,0.20639677,0.008494848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012796267,0.000058067446,0.013465667,0.0012670687,0.00008410289,0.00032639012,0.013642435,0.0015954727,0.0005099855,0.1324133,0.8362384,0.00027119866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98534554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99170613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17206156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17206156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13139884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9602912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2731244347","doi":"","title":"Like a Prayer: Administrative Law Implications of the Supreme Court's Freedom of Religion Decision in Saguenay","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Tribunal; Political science; Jurisdiction; Statute; Statutory law; Duty; Neutrality; High Court; Common law; Judicial review","score_opus":0.035823379433521214,"score_gpt":0.3394314810840748,"score_spread":0.3036081016505536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2731244347","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15660234,0.016676812,0.0056159366,0.4770816,0.0036779756,0.00069559744,0.0006705524,0.00017766337,0.33880147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7405053,0.0028317717,0.0044789608,0.19109982,0.0013064437,0.0004248865,0.00015055979,0.00011010537,0.059092186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96555793,0.009131275,0.0015414824,0.0049774325,0.007667888,0.01112401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95513445,0.030479627,0.0013721343,0.0013410548,0.008638722,0.0030339996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03841911,0.0007679105,0.0017932694,0.002793598,0.04548129,0.031431917,0.00844899,0.037683714,0.0062965574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06826737,0.0016394805,0.0021056212,0.0034316613,0.021554844,0.008417004,0.008620273,0.027455013,0.0005257855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001230824,0.00006757551,0.0023612536,0.000097920536,0.00009547558,0.003005012,0.013975477,0.0006591328,0.0007370706,0.92557985,0.046828482,0.0064696437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060275255,0.00025807734,0.02325235,0.0012626105,0.0005737035,0.000929748,0.033729255,0.0045507783,0.0026562954,0.2557739,0.675144,0.0012665035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8944332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92770314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1055668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08792113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11276382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6379154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2731542888","doi":"","title":"Her Excellency the Right Honourable Michaëlle Jean Address to the Canadian Judicial Council","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.057820193180389154,"score_gpt":0.292121135649175,"score_spread":0.23430094246878586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2731542888","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032010127,0.0037239091,0.0006190008,0.7642675,0.03573896,0.00014765817,0.0008643134,0.00024114756,0.19119655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011052419,0.0008131319,0.00033617398,0.039896205,0.0011209716,0.00002468081,0.00011080662,0.00007121043,0.94657445],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932821,0.00049581984,0.00014019627,0.00073660124,0.0029401847,0.0024050942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756546,0.0010606183,0.00027183074,0.0003794249,0.011364399,0.011269211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003811701,0.00068447593,0.0010633644,0.0018700404,0.035020716,0.0100500155,0.0018806563,0.008063315,0.099667706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018723805,0.0007638835,0.0005543164,0.000979423,0.0032190813,0.0022642608,0.00380296,0.013175943,0.022190953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008353996,0.000007941497,0.0003694922,0.000012328921,0.000002226941,0.000101541096,0.00039345294,0.00002014178,0.000100548554,0.006552761,0.9886131,0.0038180163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033331203,0.0000040216687,0.00079636334,0.0000392964,0.0000024048834,0.00006327863,0.0015029497,0.000046266985,0.000060362923,0.0006557403,0.9968086,0.000017358247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8361443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96813947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03186051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.083408415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33342165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2732675681","doi":"10.17118/11143/10278","title":"Les trente premières années de la Charte canadienne en droit de la famille","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.011576309337373148,"score_gpt":0.23791459240995033,"score_spread":0.2263382830725772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2732675681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04996547,0.021289509,0.006109052,0.079203546,0.0038099042,0.00017319538,0.0010129559,0.00011729641,0.838319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45010546,0.0094058635,0.0031955896,0.0145644,0.00083535386,0.00018339224,0.00029528717,0.00012677352,0.5212878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980761,0.00034400515,0.000053951942,0.00020441957,0.00071616605,0.00060546264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797684,0.0007250226,0.00012830195,0.00010638715,0.00083448505,0.00022910631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012234498,0.0004509683,0.00033548602,0.0013413887,0.009660449,0.0045611076,0.00094432296,0.0028814757,0.009825438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033753386,0.00022860669,0.00034279632,0.0015210044,0.007980362,0.0012138798,0.0013955196,0.0041019996,0.0009242847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002161505,0.000018302828,0.001468736,0.00010495291,0.0000071918253,0.0003397468,0.038167007,0.00025787862,0.00032228607,0.8464129,0.095639355,0.01723999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003754477,0.000011071642,0.005025059,0.0002433855,0.000004686231,0.000108835855,0.0062497566,0.00012268305,0.00026010894,0.00782217,0.9801214,0.000027206264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8287646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9137397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17123538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035023965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028063366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3444876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2732852429","doi":"10.11575/prism/34270","title":"Alberta First Nations Consultation &amp; Accommodation Handbook","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada; University of Calgary","keywords":"Accommodation; Political science; Foundation (evidence); Library science; Sociology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.019032624466594514,"score_gpt":0.24459034093909018,"score_spread":0.22555771647249567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2732852429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018022055,0.007963504,0.0018851554,0.020513419,0.0025276195,0.00026751013,0.001954848,0.0010744827,0.96201134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010338307,0.0024167036,0.0031759022,0.0046092006,0.00013726637,0.00008906736,0.001057525,0.00021232814,0.97796375],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969187,0.00044151102,0.00009223859,0.00013385255,0.0017954753,0.00061826955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99467766,0.00091775705,0.00017864248,0.00036024573,0.002771093,0.0010946154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034883968,0.00049602764,0.00031468508,0.0027836994,0.009773243,0.0063236733,0.0030231662,0.0036891566,0.116048954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005895485,0.0006548598,0.00028238952,0.0038279474,0.00260826,0.0016034029,0.0026507832,0.003006392,0.026372012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008413428,0.000017139348,0.00012677508,0.00006954675,6.6364436e-7,0.00013911916,0.00088779867,0.000117235926,0.00009900568,0.022347936,0.9471177,0.029068775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013731551,0.000001617409,0.00035035046,0.000036465448,3.8528447e-7,0.000040489635,0.0005239309,0.000023351127,0.000035072484,0.000442841,0.99853754,0.0000067221754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77567285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9092393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22432715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026799751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08990983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45129645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2733248958","doi":"","title":"Subsistence or Sale?: An Analysis of Historical Questions Raised in R v. Gladstone","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Subsistence agriculture; Legislation; Supreme court; CLARITY; Spawn (biology); Indigenous rights; Whaling; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Fur trade; Fishing; Fishery; Geography; History; Economy; Archaeology; Economic history; Economics; Agriculture; Ecology","score_opus":0.08675257952076508,"score_gpt":0.3913517977895716,"score_spread":0.3045992182688065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2733248958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4258015,0.026153056,0.0027545982,0.11147403,0.0005703217,0.00007554077,0.00022459775,0.00001890721,0.43292752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740902,0.0063816686,0.00028972662,0.005977756,0.0002211369,0.000024065599,0.000036929967,0.000028274304,0.012950237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961809,0.0018594377,0.00010553894,0.00054607156,0.00049080513,0.0008172854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98979574,0.008223681,0.00073670485,0.00019198174,0.0007300769,0.0003218034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076736407,0.00023628514,0.00040637972,0.0029055758,0.020469505,0.008406325,0.0018777067,0.0047473754,0.0037078657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0148911765,0.00046701566,0.00020192929,0.0045717093,0.031870257,0.010037414,0.0038117245,0.006597968,0.00024175615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020619467,0.000020462869,0.002845259,0.00007572277,0.0000053561407,0.0018491389,0.2671008,0.0001566853,0.00011166101,0.7077964,0.007932452,0.012085438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008348391,0.000030929008,0.014816916,0.00085569953,0.00001995956,0.0010384091,0.3997773,0.00030544505,0.0005390024,0.08604188,0.49647784,0.00008829074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3811281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49564236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3811281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0267569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009550257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7578194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737015095","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3001258","title":"Business Corporations as Religious Freedom Claimants in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Religious freedom; Business; Freedom of contract; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economic freedom; Sociology","score_opus":0.017481206146859357,"score_gpt":0.2877028470214596,"score_spread":0.2702216408746002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737015095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.974479,0.0009058608,0.00006489955,0.009031071,0.000054637352,0.00004083813,0.00027364359,0.0000064264464,0.015143595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894488,0.0005757651,0.00005066899,0.0010610694,0.000011810271,0.000010711246,0.000103429025,0.0000072943203,0.008730521],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950206,0.00047331981,0.00008452742,0.00023911997,0.00080366665,0.0033787538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98447454,0.0023908326,0.0025413062,0.000292741,0.003592969,0.0067077405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017287247,0.0002569278,0.0006027283,0.0027860922,0.026880212,0.008155593,0.0024827218,0.0043003247,0.010607827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00982799,0.0005846858,0.00040784985,0.0054757134,0.0045072483,0.0023691626,0.0045957435,0.0060070283,0.00044963165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053679326,0.0009960154,0.6071277,0.00018134266,0.00008829822,0.0046095867,0.2352339,0.000669133,0.0007365343,0.07343729,0.038326893,0.038056433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006850756,0.00007677035,0.3209721,0.00037351245,0.0000964436,0.0006461932,0.61652964,0.0016208534,0.00041205442,0.0025136226,0.05653587,0.00015447666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9955214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091420874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.091420874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14343299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66330796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737595584","doi":"","title":"Liberty Rights, the Family and Constitutional Politics","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Political science; Sociology; Law; Charter; Politics; Humanities; Family law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.041895456404184336,"score_gpt":0.29038305600300246,"score_spread":0.2484875995988181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737595584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037656896,0.022361265,0.004886876,0.068734445,0.00038174933,0.000032551652,0.00017208465,0.000038959748,0.86573523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9137638,0.0047166226,0.0010993094,0.006146895,0.0003235629,0.000052405714,0.000066706285,0.000031603835,0.07379915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997703,0.00096070697,0.000051367235,0.0002694188,0.00036946722,0.00064602913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875605,0.00071463856,0.00008819522,0.00012452426,0.00019430919,0.00012223436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025817414,0.0002521937,0.00024918665,0.00084023416,0.007659367,0.007591551,0.00092233485,0.002608724,0.007122062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030489059,0.00017653377,0.00019599083,0.00080646045,0.032585446,0.00346645,0.0019288678,0.0032676912,0.00045015762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013156217,0.0000016675866,0.00004293284,0.000004491505,4.4133665e-7,0.000024916008,0.0008040375,0.000047389443,0.000017748194,0.99652267,0.0016356704,0.00089670386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013724107,0.000009358814,0.00096683257,0.00016613213,0.000005026324,0.00007278979,0.0032759358,0.00036908008,0.00019092498,0.70991766,0.28500015,0.000012328401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24036925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22560637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24036925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025886158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012363063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47794032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739314990","doi":"10.1080/00131857.2017.1303227","title":"Aborigine, Indian, Indigenous or first nations?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Philosophy and Theory","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sociology; Anthropology; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.03718675231864702,"score_gpt":0.34644253863456,"score_spread":0.30925578631591294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2739314990","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11734054,0.09234595,0.00074342766,0.51780945,0.0053447876,0.00003805821,0.00018452175,0.00003871299,0.26615465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8291465,0.044235807,0.000739402,0.031453136,0.0014717308,0.00006146568,0.00011719105,0.000024799754,0.09274995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916947,0.0005006726,0.000012865038,0.00005310618,0.00009288287,0.00017105113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937516,0.000222893,0.000085275235,0.000034921337,0.00013651085,0.0001452067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001945376,0.0002980201,0.00036035862,0.00070670695,0.00435813,0.0030897139,0.00074585446,0.0014461654,0.004682822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023061978,0.00020351389,0.00014336439,0.0011352072,0.007884815,0.0055137775,0.0014980849,0.0027340802,0.0008515757],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007669346,0.000076988494,0.017187444,0.00034210857,0.00001960343,0.0005687982,0.2723927,0.000074556774,0.00019442149,0.4077015,0.22800826,0.07335698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024427336,0.000064611384,0.049682066,0.0016131755,0.000042581476,0.00050577824,0.4719638,0.00016245329,0.0002654924,0.03658014,0.4390597,0.000035875055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.118938655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21278553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8810613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020429057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036472618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2364927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740470807","doi":"","title":"Canada's Charter of Rights: Paradigm Lost?","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Originalism; Context (archaeology); Normative; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.022380810603533505,"score_gpt":0.23549237382532268,"score_spread":0.21311156322178917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740470807","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041317274,0.24286942,0.0044194674,0.64594245,0.009637142,0.00008086069,0.0006618065,0.00015498587,0.09210212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41974512,0.28576428,0.014421618,0.15798067,0.0064620785,0.00020842008,0.00061789056,0.00022553191,0.114574365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833808,0.0032064484,0.00050527445,0.0015650553,0.009617736,0.0017246569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983472,0.0040693274,0.0006827337,0.001294798,0.008767893,0.0017133784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011476125,0.00040157675,0.0007216632,0.0040368736,0.0064128176,0.015643267,0.002573147,0.004811634,0.0026272296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027016677,0.00038773773,0.0003472031,0.0059434525,0.023202883,0.00550754,0.0017740045,0.0054439562,0.00046753566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013605037,0.000008537849,0.00030374897,0.00032638578,0.0000147858555,0.00008223656,0.0015411153,0.00029063202,0.00017484938,0.6753587,0.25368616,0.06819931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000797325,0.000005683419,0.0010829079,0.0005447312,0.000009759709,0.00004469081,0.00071531656,0.00016373728,0.000110504225,0.038515504,0.95876455,0.00003453165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95361143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9658154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099222645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.099222645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30687535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7199141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741567171","doi":"","title":"Citizen Supplicants?: Alain Carins' Citizens Plus and the Politics of Aboriginal/Constitutional Scholarship","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Politics; Scholarship; Humanities; Political science; Context (archaeology); Elaboration; Sociology; Ethnology; Law; Philosophy; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03733390591740756,"score_gpt":0.29782038788227494,"score_spread":0.2604864819648674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741567171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16113125,0.05710643,0.0005859254,0.3727353,0.0010258971,0.000018802246,0.000051854455,0.000049599865,0.40729496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9242377,0.006261869,0.00026256082,0.0120297205,0.0002970291,0.000014301627,0.00001187131,0.000034373254,0.05685047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984238,0.00073612644,0.000022302629,0.00015729174,0.0002456383,0.00041487158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972566,0.0017229146,0.00018386872,0.00012011268,0.00032690735,0.00038957875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002407031,0.00018094837,0.00029911543,0.000740118,0.016013565,0.009093661,0.0008621402,0.00252155,0.004453273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027496822,0.0001321115,0.00011093462,0.0013813792,0.02830871,0.0032201293,0.003143332,0.0029714182,0.00026679743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022989803,0.000012716557,0.0009039876,0.00006890094,0.0000027901183,0.00024224444,0.10747639,0.00005371535,0.00008714723,0.8546362,0.027147798,0.009345014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015776863,0.000021066904,0.0056194784,0.0003933929,0.0000110360215,0.00015462721,0.1572202,0.0001379668,0.0002840701,0.06561415,0.7704963,0.000031942374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5418651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6762468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4581349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02342939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021857012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9216659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742267879","doi":"","title":"The Purpose of Canadian Equality Rights","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Fundamental rights; Identity (music); Sociology; Ethnology; Law; Human rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07338972501701502,"score_gpt":0.29192099156510964,"score_spread":0.21853126654809463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742267879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036826062,0.004188373,0.0023307484,0.03694074,0.00128364,0.00007396552,0.0005467606,0.00007498486,0.95087826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24963458,0.0048749247,0.0049386816,0.022758828,0.0006181924,0.000162538,0.00072967546,0.0001859756,0.7160966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892948,0.0011908894,0.00026358958,0.0015490062,0.0045081964,0.0031934641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99391454,0.0008848319,0.00022261425,0.000581646,0.0035741508,0.0008221335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039764377,0.00078548625,0.00056554645,0.0024475255,0.025754636,0.016201168,0.0024279833,0.005014991,0.027269812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009816377,0.00051799824,0.0005815978,0.0035268352,0.0153914355,0.0048149894,0.004982111,0.006839475,0.002826446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000573547,0.0000044245776,0.00024278817,0.000022687122,0.0000019742452,0.00004061857,0.0018964988,0.000051225194,0.000053942607,0.9432204,0.045053914,0.009405892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007660769,0.0000048062875,0.001449994,0.00012854366,0.000008241796,0.00004682535,0.0016442803,0.00013803838,0.00019719286,0.03902477,0.9573239,0.000025729161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.967837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9685116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89775455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.102245435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15505219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.741846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743247351","doi":"","title":"Capturing Proceeds from Criminal Notoriety: A Case Study","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Parliament; Law; Legislation; Political science; Mandate; Criminal law; Legislature; Cabinet (room); Constitution; History; Politics","score_opus":0.06359759635595999,"score_gpt":0.30414136980302,"score_spread":0.24054377344706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743247351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8958316,0.0049824547,0.0019087609,0.011443329,0.00020074313,0.0006731056,0.00018093617,0.000015110193,0.08476395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94313395,0.012003644,0.0022204139,0.007862777,0.00020003402,0.0004849684,0.00011917178,0.00003279444,0.033942256],"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99599457,0.0018747093,0.00020765592,0.00024689373,0.00065387494,0.0010222449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99341244,0.0045340587,0.00074558024,0.0002694972,0.0005289555,0.0005094523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004539097,0.00069300155,0.00058712816,0.0020919284,0.014856725,0.003671091,0.0021222644,0.006545281,0.0045843516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00997067,0.00067957863,0.00070322445,0.0025759547,0.0046574413,0.0028371746,0.0036232946,0.004552605,0.00062659354],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019441977,0.0033854258,0.06067156,0.0008436351,0.0000724178,0.5119525,0.2358465,0.0008033671,0.0011991536,0.10941937,0.029722426,0.04588925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013532833,0.0007063794,0.046941373,0.002306358,0.00018052003,0.17852148,0.52129066,0.0014727997,0.0020432011,0.010756562,0.23545751,0.00018781885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.079867125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24752265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079867125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007928758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063223136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15880448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744466085","doi":"","title":"Fake It Till You Make it: Policymaking and Assisted Human Reproduction in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Reimbursement; Legitimacy; Reproduction; Business; Government (linguistics); Action (physics); Law; Political science; Public administration; Health care; Politics","score_opus":0.03434679643321485,"score_gpt":0.30541404123796767,"score_spread":0.2710672448047528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744466085","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086982556,0.012867038,0.0016607394,0.6918792,0.0016208411,0.0002679375,0.0003980111,0.00007380398,0.20424992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81802106,0.0056618173,0.002315565,0.12297115,0.00027029787,0.00013426057,0.00013910705,0.000087484324,0.05039921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9649465,0.0068508848,0.0009924748,0.002039411,0.008740457,0.016430235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94763565,0.01727379,0.0018465937,0.0007853691,0.013756939,0.018701782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015685698,0.0006353892,0.0010096648,0.003466267,0.059129816,0.023798073,0.0052109077,0.01996733,0.012480075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045832485,0.00095801154,0.0012144557,0.005791094,0.025308887,0.0056733424,0.008914138,0.017698383,0.00062148523],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011543051,0.00025894927,0.01486756,0.00027641607,0.00009899535,0.001613883,0.039648898,0.0026992476,0.0004867854,0.78148836,0.12822708,0.030218283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026014406,0.00014419544,0.05055689,0.0016384402,0.0002473236,0.00041141108,0.14485095,0.008564013,0.00091365323,0.15277518,0.6385669,0.0010708723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.998103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35904112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.35904112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.6658324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74342144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2746322026","doi":"","title":"Legal Modesty and Political Boldness: The Supreme Court of Canada's Decision in Chaoulli V. Quebec","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Victory; Law; Politics; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Health care; Dispose pattern; Majority opinion; Supreme Court Decisions; Sociology","score_opus":0.019684977224863873,"score_gpt":0.2691515264457322,"score_spread":0.24946654922086833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2746322026","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14803387,0.012768129,0.00088486064,0.48016483,0.001286189,0.00007808447,0.0004152411,0.00004733904,0.3563215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.904695,0.0023380131,0.00034838583,0.05837357,0.00026766292,0.000042033313,0.00006329342,0.000030335894,0.03384171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99264574,0.0012282572,0.00009953718,0.00052931806,0.0019765785,0.0035204778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99354833,0.002654435,0.00027437243,0.00015035114,0.0018213522,0.0015510953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056638625,0.00032419807,0.00054505037,0.0013715926,0.04719704,0.014606341,0.002405924,0.010336983,0.005391102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013818206,0.0005076559,0.00051012344,0.001987603,0.018629048,0.002346356,0.0030448532,0.012887359,0.00027294873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006139341,0.000033795128,0.0048435293,0.00004468383,0.000035087593,0.00081390206,0.015292154,0.000458085,0.0004986221,0.8816161,0.08797313,0.008329482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030797796,0.000084114225,0.050620787,0.0009195356,0.00021429334,0.00033896643,0.042518653,0.002666452,0.0016389212,0.15471523,0.7454902,0.00048486397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9931676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15483469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15483469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18368968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98027194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2746993430","doi":"","title":"A Monkey in the Middle: Reflections on Darwin the Macaque and the (R)evolution of Wild Animals in Canadian Common Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Macaque; Darwin (ADL); Law; Political science; Biology; Ecology; Computer science","score_opus":0.10889143283905599,"score_gpt":0.3557957030392611,"score_spread":0.2469042702002051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2746993430","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14093103,0.03787315,0.0010066513,0.7231755,0.0017433681,0.000023378485,0.00012065856,0.00002368641,0.095102556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9005248,0.008271197,0.0006404354,0.07173774,0.000833542,0.000013102736,0.000027272506,0.000045721397,0.017906168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99617356,0.0008952309,0.00006496383,0.00050980365,0.0006446347,0.0017118768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99318486,0.0029662598,0.0003376338,0.00019563598,0.0016871752,0.0016284703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008872315,0.00040107555,0.00064974657,0.0016247551,0.027736017,0.010659071,0.0034120346,0.011336643,0.00602594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01026013,0.00035887377,0.00035094778,0.0020781285,0.07569685,0.007111614,0.0046875207,0.011570538,0.00031283704],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008291606,0.00005039676,0.0061570113,0.00011516345,0.000033730754,0.0013724046,0.3829763,0.00039375588,0.00089972606,0.48438513,0.095251076,0.028282411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019023584,0.000030640887,0.014729682,0.00062792015,0.000048351852,0.00057679886,0.32877633,0.00021848963,0.00044998602,0.070676334,0.5836699,0.00017648547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9695831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98495585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07094693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07094693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059829656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51475847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747512870","doi":"","title":"Royal succession, abdication, and regency in the realms","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abdication; Parliament; Dominion; Law; Humanities; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.04576666992306225,"score_gpt":0.33130244826572774,"score_spread":0.2855357783426655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2747512870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11263133,0.008520312,0.0029371958,0.0168525,0.0004191691,0.00006494156,0.00004830288,0.00004002395,0.8584863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89577425,0.0020769374,0.0007203196,0.0029798828,0.00016175574,0.000025789435,0.000016207978,0.000017704799,0.098227136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951723,0.0011503211,0.00025358575,0.0004375731,0.0012913147,0.0016948519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975007,0.0010307396,0.0002868543,0.00017121618,0.0004985586,0.0005119132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027179243,0.00021682048,0.0002726504,0.00082844065,0.01050846,0.0057616774,0.0008299331,0.0028135679,0.0069991313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008430674,0.00032192998,0.00030461125,0.0006994032,0.026424557,0.0029046421,0.004798545,0.0045182994,0.0005590879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000149333755,0.000011936429,0.001008885,0.00002847288,0.0000033033796,0.0004882449,0.011104071,0.00016698157,0.00019225253,0.97583413,0.0044147507,0.0067320024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004823817,0.00006692673,0.021534063,0.0006192507,0.000027431493,0.0010423107,0.03129216,0.0008325986,0.0009669401,0.18149307,0.7619709,0.00010625407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33916965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5408141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33916965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01771966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017420571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6743909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751126414","doi":"","title":"The Perils of Federalizing the Common Law: A Case Study of the Income Tax Act Gift Concept","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Statutory law; Tax law; Political science; Public law; Private law; Civil law (Civil law); Municipal law; Comparative law; Meaning (existential); Legislation; Federal law; Law and economics; Sociology; Tax reform; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027988910541428172,"score_gpt":0.34420177921804096,"score_spread":0.3162128686766128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751126414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57382333,0.0036925268,0.012485068,0.09391071,0.000333077,0.0002334903,0.00007273645,0.000049650032,0.31539944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98336434,0.00090608734,0.0019929018,0.0048623523,0.000061861036,0.00008938957,0.000015999882,0.000020320094,0.008686671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98806316,0.007464296,0.0001575091,0.0004545822,0.0015332475,0.0023272887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891607,0.008465912,0.00054552243,0.00041924478,0.00076554035,0.00064310164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0127095375,0.0004342352,0.0007242327,0.0021094086,0.040371183,0.009277865,0.0024285666,0.010067318,0.0030734506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014997282,0.00047477393,0.0009451921,0.0033024568,0.037182838,0.008422744,0.0076868436,0.011349781,0.00020533634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021098862,0.000076112934,0.0022327993,0.000034156288,0.000006292097,0.003366259,0.067331314,0.00038864417,0.0001345034,0.9162623,0.006531061,0.003615402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010514987,0.00011717715,0.008755812,0.0007528345,0.00009178431,0.004490099,0.48110884,0.0061330516,0.0015596957,0.20302132,0.2937176,0.0001466561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38008058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50287896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38008058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03756958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019705813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75573653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751127831","doi":"","title":"Come colmare il divario tra diritto e società? In cerca di coerenza tra ‘right to die’, suicidio assistito ed eutanasia in Canada [Right to Die in Courts and Society: A Legal and Social Analysis of Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide in Canada]","year":2010,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Right to die; Law","score_opus":0.07082562435310025,"score_gpt":0.31303951366302657,"score_spread":0.24221388930992632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751127831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53414744,0.014190707,0.00052265206,0.3650877,0.00078881916,0.000050754057,0.00030406294,0.000013200361,0.08489462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97984195,0.0027323167,0.00016285447,0.0082607325,0.000078763886,0.00002077343,0.00004780498,0.000019398027,0.008835548],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951746,0.0010994365,0.000096930315,0.00034802078,0.0009220591,0.0023590296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99398875,0.0014043637,0.0005837634,0.00016262956,0.0011978709,0.0026626287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044427575,0.0002893139,0.000650985,0.0017548242,0.037838224,0.016462484,0.0030979984,0.005495137,0.0051510194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010342112,0.0005101232,0.00035056105,0.005842996,0.0407918,0.008785842,0.0061597987,0.009335141,0.00024591564],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039366863,0.0000788382,0.031771634,0.0000769369,0.000021322774,0.00043893757,0.64359933,0.00014208752,0.00008865751,0.26811612,0.033192143,0.022434628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017247832,0.000016751515,0.056643445,0.0002830517,0.000029019782,0.00013261673,0.8201891,0.00014547039,0.00008809628,0.012574696,0.10981809,0.00006242472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9899978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080558136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.080558136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17077082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5844929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751940329","doi":"","title":"The Married Women's Property Acts of Ontario : being Con. Stat. U.C., c. 73 ; 35 Vict., c. 16, Ont., and 36 Vict., c. 18, Ont. : with [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books  | UK Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Philosophy","score_opus":0.016890695148769563,"score_gpt":0.24799393547634382,"score_spread":0.23110324032757426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751940329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033634745,0.012720418,0.0011475818,0.04572615,0.0014398934,0.00045048905,0.022910334,0.00033190884,0.8816385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1506861,0.0039835735,0.0012514332,0.0118236905,0.00018285726,0.00033258362,0.0026610293,0.000110334724,0.8289684],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996912,0.00013325481,0.0001287133,0.00016338215,0.0017432066,0.000919445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99640036,0.00034388495,0.00019814291,0.00016455144,0.0023453757,0.0005476309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012545675,0.0005284396,0.00034226425,0.0009349421,0.017650919,0.0030170942,0.0014283559,0.0040715896,0.020264301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035771572,0.0010077788,0.00050587446,0.002442772,0.0021108214,0.0011126492,0.0014633163,0.0026500938,0.003589891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055456887,0.00003908337,0.010073176,0.000183155,0.000017535966,0.00043271514,0.0134132495,0.0001988108,0.0008797394,0.070273906,0.8846062,0.01982693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017395012,0.00001780708,0.054080907,0.00011776302,0.000029791972,0.00007033742,0.0044975462,0.00013515561,0.0003332688,0.0013436659,0.93929994,0.00005650003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05000297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05000297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12469088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36279863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752753930","doi":"","title":"Are All Charter Rights and Freedoms Really Non-Absolute?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Fundamental rights; Humanities; Philosophy; Human rights","score_opus":0.02911855903871838,"score_gpt":0.3018260082206814,"score_spread":0.272707449181963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752753930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023999587,0.0047808588,0.024014045,0.1293107,0.0013645596,0.000048638394,0.00028876733,0.00015841384,0.81603444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89531547,0.0031412449,0.010753738,0.01984721,0.00088067976,0.00011585589,0.0002424934,0.00012463494,0.06957874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98142195,0.0035932364,0.00053561124,0.0024162286,0.008245027,0.003787917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874522,0.0046174545,0.0012565268,0.0020833588,0.0036163044,0.0009742549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012796739,0.0004300282,0.00081808405,0.001169097,0.0095831575,0.011846321,0.0026192314,0.0042479197,0.00976606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02941961,0.0004359444,0.00066522096,0.001128079,0.047283445,0.01481962,0.0045623914,0.009543571,0.0011434382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002314969,0.0000028192187,0.000121000696,0.000012117201,0.0000013231255,0.000009521191,0.00078020355,0.0000356093,0.000023598863,0.9925304,0.0028843728,0.0035967897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010115404,0.000012597289,0.0019642678,0.00022634299,0.000010365865,0.00006173739,0.0026360368,0.00023672046,0.0002817717,0.82433146,0.17017879,0.00004983803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18027765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21833172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18027765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012637033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024396937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3584566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753240539","doi":"","title":"Statutes of the province of Ontario.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books  | UK Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.018388784909893957,"score_gpt":0.2665421542642308,"score_spread":0.24815336935433682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753240539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060880473,0.0076686335,0.00066628185,0.01331044,0.0011746708,0.00039487376,0.10346236,0.00037427314,0.8668604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021839961,0.003047616,0.00076415145,0.0019386868,0.00013244845,0.00019532169,0.010759596,0.00013354939,0.96118855],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746025,0.00009176387,0.00010710863,0.00019336432,0.0014640008,0.000683529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99619496,0.00033132883,0.00015486017,0.00020173262,0.0027752393,0.00034189687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010256022,0.00065482483,0.00062082865,0.0026566854,0.00912156,0.00409384,0.0015701649,0.0025573934,0.09493907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003990407,0.001140116,0.0004758344,0.0073322537,0.0014334421,0.0014233949,0.0010804213,0.0021397867,0.014780554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004746023,0.000018479313,0.0023018834,0.00017999097,0.000008879028,0.000096187425,0.0007730573,0.00012780445,0.00017000928,0.05641108,0.9239536,0.01591146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016046859,0.0000055420824,0.0133713065,0.000113609,0.000009530444,0.000024260438,0.00048674704,0.00008957922,0.00009673102,0.0012816038,0.9844849,0.000020237017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9923483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99689037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09493907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051567145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11034377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3741476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754291607","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwx039","title":"A Human Rights Perspective of Assisted Suicide: Accounting for Disparate Jurisprudence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legislature; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Parliament; High Court; Politics","score_opus":0.09521898072499438,"score_gpt":0.454386274419599,"score_spread":0.35916729369460465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754291607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025685756,0.01683956,0.054476272,0.14901312,0.001501591,0.00016934545,0.00012543767,0.000039591465,0.75214934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93583745,0.0059187193,0.010922912,0.018380778,0.0028907703,0.00023760227,0.00006132813,0.00008435401,0.025666218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98235554,0.010106937,0.00040229675,0.0015697132,0.0032849647,0.0022805957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98759127,0.007993095,0.0008652202,0.0013775574,0.0014269247,0.0007460144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01743602,0.0009181665,0.0010393145,0.0033432054,0.009800252,0.015077358,0.0051651504,0.015498424,0.008625519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018673403,0.00064331916,0.0013681777,0.00178346,0.083049655,0.021507083,0.011061019,0.018422946,0.0009110538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017365218,0.0000043823675,0.0000553656,0.000007436069,0.0000019783079,0.0000627618,0.0009850779,0.00012059594,0.000008818735,0.9978563,0.00036258556,0.00053284096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007776717,0.0000090183885,0.00014088835,0.00007640064,0.00000518257,0.00008993855,0.0012852246,0.00049581204,0.00002753181,0.9847335,0.013119358,0.000009344538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02775211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023257816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02775211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014959644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01413716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1085403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756062785","doi":"","title":"Addressing disputes between First Nations: An exploration of the indigenous legal lodge","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Law; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.25197287582867617,"score_gpt":0.3682402492349883,"score_spread":0.11626737340631216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756062785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5073559,0.0030847085,0.0051722266,0.018774318,0.00011342647,0.00009277891,0.000031985073,0.000009803739,0.46536478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935761,0.0006286403,0.00086947205,0.0006433566,0.000021770504,0.000032246597,0.000008165372,0.00000672029,0.0042134896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908702,0.0059490595,0.00013754243,0.00042911054,0.0010784649,0.001535715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97896487,0.016700048,0.0014656076,0.0007676057,0.0010071715,0.001094662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012550154,0.0003186505,0.00065774267,0.0034797816,0.027287006,0.018876914,0.0035912916,0.0055300696,0.008303538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0262731,0.00037060754,0.00053986337,0.004721301,0.036736928,0.019542022,0.014692149,0.005984998,0.0001968514],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017211074,0.00007546235,0.0035908492,0.000089457324,0.000011890899,0.0007297403,0.2808762,0.0001654304,0.000100892656,0.7009464,0.0008484601,0.012548096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000124128555,0.00004145423,0.00831618,0.0006226214,0.000026953365,0.00045878367,0.7850257,0.000679709,0.00019995846,0.16192718,0.042666573,0.000022527809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044511754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09894062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044511754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009773206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012470906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08850533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756904910","doi":"10.11157/anzswj-vol29iss3id301","title":"Supporting grandparent/grandchild contact under the Care of Children Act 2004: an assessment of current options, and a call for change.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grandparent; Legislation; Aotearoa; Family law; Legal guardian; Law; Safeguarding; Political science; Respite care; Medicine; Psychology; Nursing; Sociology","score_opus":0.060175950474610246,"score_gpt":0.4135407394023933,"score_spread":0.353364788927783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756904910","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33429956,0.044131357,0.0010122659,0.5201447,0.0009189867,0.00081622874,0.0010361742,0.00009897606,0.0975417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8651306,0.048405822,0.008324878,0.0547142,0.00021079434,0.0010075261,0.0011117572,0.000033035787,0.02106145],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98770577,0.0035444861,0.0011766552,0.00047669763,0.0048900335,0.002206441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94290096,0.034430962,0.006680314,0.0011217,0.008249594,0.0066164853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021012947,0.00018800201,0.00032145617,0.002058091,0.005864705,0.00738868,0.003243598,0.00462136,0.004956555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08410564,0.00042257697,0.00059923675,0.0037444315,0.0043460405,0.0056692013,0.0034981673,0.005295888,0.00038888326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020444217,0.0005726165,0.13741402,0.004974554,0.00008880745,0.003976796,0.20626819,0.00053572864,0.0010745492,0.08673364,0.17760143,0.38055524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008118183,0.00028071442,0.20940135,0.012206278,0.00012081265,0.0012852098,0.34167433,0.0005434652,0.0005750472,0.0051477123,0.42853326,0.00015062804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6760508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8370887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6760508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030939823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18015629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.651714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758548719","doi":"","title":"Constitutional law of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01665031955606958,"score_gpt":0.2386969532323604,"score_spread":0.22204663367629082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758548719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055818204,0.012388151,0.00058308,0.038547084,0.0010699602,0.00009781212,0.0027527702,0.00012703492,0.9388523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14586581,0.009361591,0.0016107507,0.017076802,0.00049790496,0.00019906198,0.0011993605,0.0001740809,0.8240146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949254,0.0003422808,0.00012411967,0.00055466814,0.002421406,0.0016321106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99677616,0.00042221366,0.00006693799,0.00020488395,0.0020349447,0.00049486046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019117612,0.0007729944,0.0007677133,0.003315683,0.023218002,0.014642194,0.0025648007,0.00535565,0.034009207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007929557,0.00090839533,0.0006085525,0.005306562,0.006586773,0.0026810851,0.002162922,0.0059625832,0.0027099976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010123529,0.000015854806,0.0004259473,0.00004219127,0.0000067086366,0.00004663076,0.00085387274,0.00018772835,0.00005030124,0.75259864,0.2371689,0.008593052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012361407,0.000005243742,0.0018964628,0.00017111005,0.000014900014,0.00002703221,0.0009789238,0.00019790781,0.00008366026,0.03316841,0.963408,0.000035916968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99446833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1330844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1330844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29677656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9655994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759537800","doi":"10.29173/alr791","title":"Life Among the Ruins: Section 91(24) After Tsilhqot'in and Grassy Narrows","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Supreme court; Law; Section (typography); Doctrine; Sovereign immunity; Constitution; Conversation; Political science; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.032250880041400615,"score_gpt":0.32218425469092465,"score_spread":0.28993337464952407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759537800","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062019993,0.09581462,0.0016135256,0.27043346,0.0044101644,0.000095104864,0.00052764255,0.000059596663,0.5650259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58033967,0.028057655,0.0010670404,0.19896518,0.0010908595,0.00010609409,0.00032015226,0.00005546227,0.18999791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973399,0.00056265737,0.0000933434,0.00030804862,0.0008266163,0.00086938054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985557,0.0007213486,0.000121971374,0.00006845003,0.00039434398,0.00013807493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044028526,0.00019751546,0.00035973045,0.00053036393,0.008908293,0.0036021925,0.0011599659,0.0057552485,0.0035300157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050667413,0.00022891424,0.0003577544,0.000890323,0.009106061,0.001994781,0.0018579245,0.006307857,0.00057073194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002037313,0.000013033732,0.0010154786,0.00019001341,0.0000111416875,0.0004099748,0.02331117,0.00008957129,0.00035953516,0.8305635,0.118658714,0.02535749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012134363,0.000025818073,0.006835044,0.00063458696,0.0000327755,0.00012427766,0.01069503,0.000028577728,0.00034739348,0.028284024,0.952941,0.000039357725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68585944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79392064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31414056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0143233845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036349215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63198113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W275968636","doi":"","title":"Families and the Law in Canada: Cases and Commentary by Mary Jane Mossman","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Genealogy; Sociology; Political science; History","score_opus":0.00799124255081855,"score_gpt":0.24330209363889954,"score_spread":0.235310851088081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W275968636","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006395821,0.016540091,0.0000768985,0.95604604,0.0049057216,0.00003511037,0.000068548405,0.000008137037,0.015923684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09171901,0.019150633,0.00031079206,0.85317147,0.00393808,0.000098207274,0.000034217726,0.000075877266,0.03150172],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922522,0.0016276547,0.00029436682,0.0007705453,0.0021181602,0.002937041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9707036,0.018404126,0.0008822746,0.0002151237,0.0051878444,0.004607096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073493673,0.00076713774,0.0015232125,0.002495131,0.07219865,0.013712249,0.006461181,0.05288864,0.0074752863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034677923,0.0012732345,0.0011545896,0.004997424,0.017764749,0.005399402,0.005254386,0.044303257,0.00074215914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041063253,0.000033967364,0.0011905798,0.00019719667,0.000036162448,0.0020700586,0.02584536,0.00019900012,0.000106495856,0.03047648,0.9335172,0.006286388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050343584,0.000018587538,0.0045812423,0.0022501738,0.00013325449,0.00075435016,0.17038116,0.00028425117,0.00023821609,0.0087192515,0.81238705,0.00020207728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96975124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9889985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09103935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09103935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18152641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66053987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760111773","doi":"","title":"The statutes of Nova Scotia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Statute; Geography; Political science; Law; Archaeology; Engineering; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.02156211937397611,"score_gpt":0.26667958574001605,"score_spread":0.24511746636603993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760111773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018434046,0.010563099,0.00042303078,0.03559444,0.003857288,0.00023925434,0.024946395,0.00035355688,0.90558887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048886847,0.0030441997,0.0005414256,0.0067770113,0.00020479981,0.00011224266,0.0025823924,0.00009631804,0.93775475],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997696,0.0001018863,0.000113419184,0.00018819654,0.001150515,0.00074991566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969311,0.00037004743,0.00014925112,0.00018735645,0.0019472378,0.00041494798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008897167,0.0004912913,0.00048760913,0.003118118,0.008502744,0.007968261,0.001465664,0.0036023771,0.04629289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00543992,0.00092771236,0.00047954152,0.004835673,0.0016738591,0.0012012761,0.001184892,0.003653294,0.00841997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048664777,0.000027331029,0.0027961815,0.0001572669,0.000012435041,0.00030668837,0.0010740531,0.0002060845,0.0003064942,0.12330542,0.8440079,0.027751524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013590052,0.000007483056,0.016866889,0.00026008554,0.000010314067,0.000053807962,0.000638432,0.00014161672,0.00013293109,0.0024839912,0.9793578,0.000033161698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.980115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04629289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046178896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11089633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3350529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760640120","doi":"","title":"An act to render permanent certain parts of the act for amending the Constitution of the Government of Newfoundland: 25th June 1847","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books  | UK Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Public administration; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030055536454277988,"score_gpt":0.30367965761776666,"score_spread":0.27362412116348866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760640120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017923418,0.030262964,0.0016498949,0.0654598,0.01950805,0.00050923775,0.004208474,0.0003758581,0.86010224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025370976,0.0021173644,0.0006703756,0.0151212895,0.000674667,0.00020748739,0.00025093145,0.00007982623,0.9555072],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964412,0.0003944516,0.0002516901,0.0004886984,0.00089263637,0.0015312296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821717,0.00056446285,0.00013954678,0.00020110323,0.00069112726,0.00018648508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028498527,0.0011157405,0.00074100116,0.0019550007,0.014618885,0.0068222973,0.0018225984,0.013339978,0.016761623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00768316,0.0018331278,0.00092881965,0.0015300813,0.0071941046,0.003456372,0.0026788637,0.014597386,0.004243783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114438895,0.00007379879,0.0015130173,0.00015803431,0.000030171559,0.00046376893,0.0051571797,0.0003283506,0.000609041,0.2575475,0.7193679,0.014636966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001706709,0.000015473024,0.0042274175,0.00022594605,0.000019684401,0.000078707795,0.000693727,0.00005631573,0.00034321545,0.0024503733,0.99180716,0.00006494746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85268056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9391012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85268056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041633293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045046613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3020721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760832621","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3044849","title":"The Door Has a Tendency to Swing Shut: The Saga of Aboriginal Peoples' Equality Claims","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Swing; Shut down; Political science; History; Law; Engineering; Visual arts; Art; Nuclear engineering","score_opus":0.023760555207843228,"score_gpt":0.3292943576302006,"score_spread":0.3055338024223574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760832621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47642016,0.0027659093,0.0007726401,0.3480672,0.0014835489,0.000018260846,0.00006676737,0.00003123906,0.17037432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976987,0.00043437103,0.00013762554,0.012782762,0.00023477117,0.000010824096,0.000009853873,0.000029103903,0.009373596],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99358636,0.0025611024,0.000155305,0.00062292384,0.0011388822,0.0019355273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98823917,0.005300403,0.0015114087,0.00091270474,0.001512452,0.0025238926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008359043,0.00018425376,0.00042907306,0.0012341593,0.027860451,0.0102232015,0.0018472124,0.008052208,0.011671785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026988106,0.0004900955,0.00042440696,0.0015056165,0.030787513,0.008646094,0.0075626504,0.01396842,0.00078647194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007236106,0.00004597417,0.008671158,0.00007711842,0.000023650677,0.0009741169,0.73549956,0.000038262955,0.00026829966,0.21034758,0.02630941,0.01767241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001858409,0.00004167805,0.01725094,0.0004398953,0.00004255028,0.00050846726,0.8198452,0.00011515033,0.00032983028,0.05241238,0.108929746,0.00006560468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12502693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16281748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87497306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012012799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2485984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761005817","doi":"","title":"Constitutional law of Canada ; Canada Act 1982 annotated","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0136230549071794,"score_gpt":0.2288224240883695,"score_spread":0.2151993691811901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761005817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018720197,0.029745817,0.0006589431,0.02087076,0.0028909468,0.00026757264,0.018094348,0.00030379376,0.9252958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01921154,0.012952916,0.0012027414,0.005424283,0.0004646434,0.00029828123,0.0037501706,0.00015911365,0.9565363],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953956,0.00029208738,0.00016069025,0.00038584738,0.0028582816,0.0009074434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942134,0.00073968223,0.00013881116,0.0002644175,0.004275442,0.00036819605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018715836,0.0013499355,0.0013688111,0.008884253,0.020817375,0.013421473,0.0033232395,0.005750429,0.06082289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008081615,0.0016186838,0.00069041614,0.019100768,0.0056930366,0.0023833287,0.0013500005,0.004977091,0.008456299],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009365403,0.000016812448,0.00019391383,0.000102842394,0.0000044108892,0.000045582492,0.0005838864,0.00027522602,0.000031021627,0.12298338,0.8667239,0.0090296045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005598397,0.0000015840536,0.0012165271,0.00018042013,0.000005886686,0.000013072669,0.0003157573,0.0000726769,0.00003305517,0.004116446,0.9940182,0.000020832907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9953027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81951356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18048641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31182343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9505196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761038845","doi":"","title":"Halsbury's Laws of Canada. Receivers and other court officers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.015744504488831433,"score_gpt":0.23608940086690597,"score_spread":0.22034489637807453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761038845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036222227,0.022331104,0.00044240104,0.026426742,0.0010044941,0.0000640917,0.003939262,0.00016249868,0.9420072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058237914,0.009078382,0.0005643068,0.0056439475,0.00014143447,0.000030933596,0.00092478754,0.000089020505,0.9252893],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843997,0.000056091314,0.000034046745,0.00008533823,0.0008929988,0.00049155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985019,0.00014655443,0.000049704675,0.000043988344,0.0010554999,0.0002024095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046243693,0.00056483597,0.00029895865,0.0019236453,0.010595573,0.0058560288,0.0013652275,0.0027427254,0.039284747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026848773,0.0005299407,0.00030534546,0.002978813,0.0026834053,0.0018436455,0.0009131495,0.0026524488,0.005495536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074879385,0.000012046561,0.000706066,0.000051435807,0.0000025173472,0.0000788894,0.0013291574,0.00007397776,0.00006509199,0.08062757,0.89021736,0.026828403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034257673,0.000002657267,0.0047539216,0.000119283504,0.0000061103524,0.00003843242,0.001396767,0.000053412605,0.000088904984,0.002754504,0.9907671,0.00001556122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99525875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99826473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06056351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06056351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12614737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43942106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761127015","doi":"","title":"Bills of the House of Commons of Canada = Projet de loi de la Chambre des communes du Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Books | European Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.01580425026619769,"score_gpt":0.23454548053418417,"score_spread":0.21874123026798648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761127015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036929243,0.020667579,0.0005442081,0.025433132,0.0022081207,0.00009454088,0.006297958,0.00034556165,0.9407161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01621807,0.0029870216,0.0002691983,0.0019778134,0.00013159751,0.00003298596,0.000659235,0.00012295856,0.9776012],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987784,0.000061302926,0.000024915387,0.00009943863,0.00069002045,0.00034600202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992236,0.000060713042,0.00002641167,0.000041413557,0.0004754003,0.00017241716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052794593,0.0006600567,0.0004535113,0.0013622715,0.010265482,0.004728845,0.00087417534,0.002266975,0.12910718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001663621,0.00054895284,0.0003683882,0.002231817,0.0016915591,0.0018637336,0.0012586543,0.0025981783,0.015403588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015541375,0.0000071543896,0.00043803427,0.000047136233,0.000002917382,0.00004860676,0.00048648342,0.00005194696,0.00009279891,0.074377835,0.90739805,0.017033586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025882525,0.0000016677341,0.00191452,0.000039366318,0.0000012298835,0.000020346013,0.00036675253,0.000021470805,0.000049275568,0.0009846153,0.99659085,0.0000073246483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9634424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9888681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12910718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025754295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045598682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43190652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761198583","doi":"","title":"Is the Canadian Constitution ready for the 21st century","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03940740421695409,"score_gpt":0.28292914761978233,"score_spread":0.24352174340282823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761198583","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003605595,0.019570606,0.00072741514,0.20230378,0.0051426417,0.000043960525,0.0012455423,0.00017412544,0.76718634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2468418,0.033363532,0.0039933296,0.113602914,0.00256719,0.00010672883,0.0013162388,0.00036837003,0.5978399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99244165,0.0004761539,0.0001065927,0.0004175588,0.0039828466,0.0025752543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915372,0.00076890626,0.0001838824,0.0003507433,0.0058223368,0.0013369196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003437153,0.00054085715,0.00066381344,0.002846088,0.019390263,0.016767612,0.0020719306,0.006095577,0.032426808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012926092,0.00047179527,0.000669457,0.005051817,0.011546873,0.0056801247,0.0020487537,0.0055208914,0.0034992958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011851221,0.000010801552,0.00046075662,0.0000717094,0.000008002199,0.000047064244,0.0012767367,0.00010927446,0.00007952524,0.54719603,0.4319971,0.018731112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038850403,0.0000021337858,0.0013876508,0.0001611024,0.000008141332,0.000013160015,0.0012260684,0.000051931165,0.00006133441,0.013398877,0.98365617,0.000029415636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99316734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99569833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13239278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13239278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35518676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96058136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761272798","doi":"","title":"statutes Canada. Laws","year":2017,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Biography | US Enciclopedia of law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; Statute of limitations; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.03921498215729867,"score_gpt":0.30602342922749903,"score_spread":0.26680844707020035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761272798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00058560463,0.0011993472,0.00016807625,0.016991435,0.0014493314,0.000114970666,0.009866522,0.0006153447,0.96900934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0036872057,0.00061675184,0.00019219586,0.0100320345,0.00016325379,0.00008525614,0.0018408999,0.000268916,0.9831134],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99419445,0.00033344413,0.00018249862,0.0005354943,0.0033840567,0.0013700706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99101853,0.0014795105,0.0002444625,0.0006559364,0.005614121,0.0009875752],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022083814,0.0009934609,0.0011583996,0.005312777,0.014715389,0.012979217,0.0036132156,0.01049679,0.45005262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010628386,0.0017047566,0.0011818801,0.0061461194,0.0028801595,0.0038464481,0.0026415726,0.009326498,0.1890287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009449885,0.00002745847,0.00023104972,0.00004034664,0.0000030712156,0.00003221249,0.00009703036,0.00003581294,0.000028281482,0.030336067,0.9605573,0.008602024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013282977,0.0000030486233,0.0006433672,0.00009833145,0.0000051023053,0.00001404535,0.00009590002,0.00005924213,0.000048250902,0.0019457703,0.99706,0.000013599894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9068924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9364104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45005262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038595624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.118857585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7844332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761710997","doi":"","title":"The dictionary of Canadian law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.019141765689103175,"score_gpt":0.24546646508556416,"score_spread":0.226324699396461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761710997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038535046,0.033510927,0.00060765084,0.01589978,0.0026632326,0.000081626444,0.0060428604,0.00023602281,0.9405726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011329932,0.032798167,0.0014400354,0.005340601,0.00071996247,0.00011839621,0.002751872,0.00024515143,0.9452559],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704856,0.00019491624,0.00011189992,0.00026898517,0.0018499383,0.0005258023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974023,0.00023539834,0.000069424466,0.00014345699,0.0019263227,0.00022317418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010628322,0.0014495875,0.00093593803,0.008630696,0.012373908,0.013659862,0.002738253,0.003111646,0.11504931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005268501,0.0007839593,0.0004894902,0.020275883,0.005053521,0.0040411814,0.0017017793,0.0042140246,0.026127383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004035778,0.0000062317304,0.000100117504,0.00010139334,0.0000017120026,0.000030152229,0.0006501432,0.00005572857,0.00002234942,0.11279044,0.86163193,0.024605658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.580558e-7,4.966452e-7,0.0001463964,0.0000733885,9.693556e-7,0.0000080467125,0.00014004913,0.000010883994,0.000006167399,0.0016754725,0.9979334,0.0000041139724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9775554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9868907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11504931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0856286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17605542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62128186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761716222","doi":"","title":"Statutes of Alberta.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science; Geology","score_opus":0.017345525414267243,"score_gpt":0.2562592963969972,"score_spread":0.23891377098272995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761716222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00088190904,0.003328609,0.000277482,0.0044634286,0.000761054,0.00006011978,0.018152405,0.00042995843,0.97164506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0043748165,0.0012338194,0.0003367983,0.0013468002,0.00005981333,0.000035061552,0.004438479,0.00011476194,0.9880597],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981345,0.000068650705,0.00004712731,0.00017938322,0.0011513687,0.00041906003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982533,0.00015138343,0.000038466416,0.00011929741,0.0012788367,0.00015876743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074810605,0.00083645654,0.00071800954,0.00315598,0.0070707086,0.0057725296,0.0020889314,0.0032163037,0.21449445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024145113,0.0010113998,0.00048188138,0.0066097705,0.0011182528,0.0015593398,0.0013194317,0.0035094703,0.07289217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020912656,0.000019219395,0.00046939074,0.00005800114,0.0000036131294,0.000056684952,0.00014625788,0.00009710983,0.000081923296,0.037690885,0.9373405,0.024015423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059549357,0.0000030517515,0.0020627999,0.000072943556,0.000004351114,0.000020010337,0.00019458479,0.00006825913,0.0000875195,0.0019087734,0.99556005,0.000011650662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94653857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97532064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21449445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023675263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046664875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7175554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761720778","doi":"","title":"Canada. Parliament. Senate. Submissions Group on the Meech Lake Constitutional Accord","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Group (periodic table); Law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.027312101258993898,"score_gpt":0.2628472531027084,"score_spread":0.2355351518437145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761720778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019270624,0.0019701566,0.00027482802,0.04291177,0.0074142525,0.00046725303,0.017412147,0.0008226654,0.92679983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009143224,0.0007876035,0.00022885708,0.016620787,0.00071824563,0.00024889296,0.0020803413,0.00043580506,0.96973634],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925113,0.00038049108,0.00019412271,0.00048953894,0.004099461,0.0023251413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911913,0.0010769918,0.00020842848,0.00041563806,0.0053268136,0.0017807639],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004777197,0.001323207,0.0015107278,0.0036984098,0.020743195,0.013007855,0.0034404069,0.014186056,0.3546391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009571236,0.0013303478,0.0010304978,0.0071932464,0.0033844344,0.0027302785,0.0033648117,0.008086311,0.13162649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018157723,0.000014656747,0.00013974855,0.000035182984,0.0000033292656,0.00003532682,0.00009733948,0.000032572287,0.00005999972,0.008485398,0.9873132,0.0037652166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023674284,0.0000054520374,0.0017793005,0.00007103162,0.000008600218,0.00000896893,0.00026869815,0.00005426172,0.00015720761,0.00094052183,0.9966468,0.000035399265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9126133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95684254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3546391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050190106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10019849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.920529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761768900","doi":"10.7202/1022069ar","title":"Federal Juridiction over Labour Relations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Legislature; Jurisdiction; Bargaining power; Order (exchange); Power (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political economy; Politics","score_opus":0.02985269595593636,"score_gpt":0.29595361937713116,"score_spread":0.2661009234211948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761768900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038951382,0.011766268,0.005706557,0.20717584,0.0056537627,0.00032271145,0.0012339182,0.00019661304,0.7289929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.646843,0.0045152004,0.0052515087,0.06310352,0.0026638918,0.00033487612,0.0005879966,0.00008159722,0.2766184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809645,0.0038941663,0.0016392354,0.0024117618,0.00623844,0.004851885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898403,0.003934026,0.0006403508,0.0007143323,0.003645004,0.0012259955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02193286,0.00049454474,0.0008767692,0.0024441143,0.027330108,0.010275961,0.0023604578,0.011145343,0.010085054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026684664,0.00088623166,0.00060398306,0.0028158498,0.01052273,0.0033959006,0.0050453255,0.012063232,0.0014211872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032093954,0.00001591365,0.0009804285,0.00007185082,0.000010056044,0.00006168839,0.0045043463,0.00012462764,0.00026768984,0.9190739,0.06627573,0.008581726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058227844,0.000035789344,0.0072217467,0.0005404551,0.000061418046,0.00006685049,0.004389314,0.00045832,0.0008116802,0.11792895,0.8683185,0.000108855646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7350143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83662206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7350143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048159365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10669332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53309244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762187591","doi":"","title":"Canada. Supreme Court","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.020415390472884005,"score_gpt":0.2592425347335706,"score_spread":0.2388271442606866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762187591","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015625242,0.005835345,0.00014050533,0.044555984,0.002914084,0.00009856827,0.00941829,0.00026573034,0.93520904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023392443,0.0035325054,0.0002887201,0.020178065,0.0006020807,0.00011378526,0.0027321489,0.0001861147,0.94897425],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953507,0.00018128695,0.00010384514,0.0004529367,0.0024113273,0.0014999497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99428964,0.000528079,0.000147361,0.00028551123,0.003932598,0.00081688206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015700662,0.00092686154,0.0011106499,0.0053265407,0.023054479,0.01286517,0.003311261,0.009472778,0.27914402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071702595,0.0011837459,0.001096214,0.007994731,0.0030500265,0.0028238236,0.0021427118,0.008568083,0.044863693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008152355,0.000014944939,0.00032179744,0.000036894977,0.000004353628,0.00005526014,0.000097508186,0.000050319297,0.000016386606,0.028857453,0.9601534,0.010383603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015759553,0.000003120378,0.0019694297,0.00018005108,0.000012374522,0.00003110836,0.00027685965,0.00013001583,0.00004584728,0.004643862,0.9926663,0.000025233121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9834464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27914402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08539142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17695582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9338298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762329121","doi":"","title":"Saskatchewan. Committee to Study and Review the Judicial System of Saskatchewan","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.015196952557516387,"score_gpt":0.257371395844525,"score_spread":0.24217444328700863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762329121","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020023843,0.027483603,0.004591689,0.21523802,0.022592993,0.011110663,0.07158085,0.0011020631,0.62627625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036579423,0.010506778,0.0054822806,0.04905822,0.00095672,0.0068582054,0.010070824,0.0002559062,0.8802316],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98838913,0.002203464,0.0014664368,0.0012075506,0.0046934215,0.0020398798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.897936,0.012178467,0.002403149,0.0054444023,0.07756076,0.0044773305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019951195,0.0010357858,0.000868779,0.007485847,0.008436839,0.007801492,0.0038828347,0.005271426,0.075523324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03417577,0.0016723037,0.0011906293,0.009723272,0.0032218609,0.0022898843,0.0027268312,0.0056344657,0.024000438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008881226,0.000028468083,0.0035593593,0.00031737416,0.00004366965,0.00019810996,0.00048247795,0.00015996043,0.0005871571,0.008766434,0.96073306,0.025035055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006203627,0.00001233945,0.021932488,0.0009668228,0.000066063214,0.00003912758,0.0019597579,0.00017701705,0.00042694175,0.0018339935,0.9724586,0.00006476197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86344576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9555037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95770884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042291187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25303277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3068455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763423419","doi":"","title":"Statutes of Nova Scotia.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Statute; Political science; Law; Geography; Archaeology; Engineering; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.0243551445866123,"score_gpt":0.27038070301787265,"score_spread":0.24602555843126034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763423419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007064707,0.009222814,0.00037391653,0.017159855,0.0034138784,0.00020705418,0.06447758,0.00044913994,0.89763093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02278887,0.0023018024,0.00043581103,0.004564705,0.00017131539,0.000118274314,0.0072392095,0.00009731059,0.96228284],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985757,0.000054245287,0.00006407311,0.00012977954,0.00075550197,0.00042071196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974413,0.00025707853,0.0000949839,0.00012990092,0.0018098525,0.00026684813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053554797,0.0005754903,0.00049871055,0.002321482,0.005336299,0.0039832406,0.0012968817,0.002810323,0.082196064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036045993,0.00080830883,0.00041089926,0.0038935295,0.000871621,0.00094851153,0.00093386124,0.0026907849,0.022153445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031260603,0.000014683357,0.0014175001,0.000086090506,0.0000053045173,0.00012532332,0.00023611833,0.00010208672,0.00014671552,0.023521168,0.9602242,0.014089613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001803021,0.000007672154,0.016921163,0.00019401946,0.000010007721,0.00004929573,0.00032208342,0.00014937672,0.00014377042,0.0013421987,0.9808202,0.000022125316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9700532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9874862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082196064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02579373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054244734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2749732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763540519","doi":"","title":"Acts of New Brunswick 1975","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.026545974793786283,"score_gpt":0.2673067504393347,"score_spread":0.24076077564554843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763540519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033846337,0.04130386,0.00054003106,0.007070586,0.0018316727,0.00013779139,0.010196531,0.00009465659,0.9354401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015444319,0.011829526,0.00067168457,0.00078511855,0.0000719632,0.000098964134,0.0017702102,0.000087858905,0.9692403],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988226,0.00012710699,0.00012559525,0.00022314358,0.00044195028,0.00025951548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992255,0.00018663607,0.00005344297,0.00009050643,0.0003659245,0.0000779087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078193145,0.0012132735,0.0006000501,0.0049734362,0.0066770134,0.0051745134,0.0017015849,0.0016439025,0.07443438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033148793,0.0012194407,0.0003776759,0.010139266,0.0030919972,0.0031687417,0.0016199156,0.0041984245,0.012908448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037933372,0.000025287733,0.0011143009,0.0002216444,0.00000870306,0.0002382228,0.0038697685,0.00027964072,0.00014613123,0.25026003,0.6538692,0.08992907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030581862,0.0000026194925,0.0019805068,0.00018265723,0.000004084437,0.000039128656,0.00089500897,0.000018964034,0.000079135134,0.0032386482,0.9935441,0.000012066867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91638774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97957325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08361226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0407153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041162204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2954116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763558572","doi":"","title":"Reforming rights : lesbian and gay struggles for legal equality in Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | European Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Gay rights; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.033551226826115464,"score_gpt":0.2865212497405849,"score_spread":0.25297002291446946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763558572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03880159,0.10626575,0.0010422117,0.21747988,0.0022667367,0.00011565577,0.0005061841,0.00007902308,0.633443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48750433,0.040614717,0.0012282294,0.025718976,0.00043344081,0.00009720806,0.00022966758,0.000091977,0.44408146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977755,0.0002120956,0.000030611587,0.00011438001,0.0007886307,0.0010788529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985258,0.00022670218,0.000044180022,0.000028917815,0.00044942313,0.0007249476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013625551,0.00043835616,0.00046618434,0.001363256,0.023619339,0.010308835,0.0020620674,0.006162908,0.012232894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004128391,0.0003217051,0.0002673334,0.002429237,0.014528115,0.0035667736,0.0030057472,0.00555868,0.0007469797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024493798,0.00005114497,0.0020224997,0.00012729733,0.000008981527,0.00033489015,0.036926433,0.00032013608,0.0001534859,0.56782764,0.33656695,0.055636026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020228228,0.000013301481,0.011189525,0.00068954413,0.00002186215,0.00017741567,0.08691902,0.0003852251,0.00023257195,0.055409774,0.8448864,0.00005512543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99773777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10361223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10361223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27906117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75176287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763678040","doi":"","title":"Constitutional adjudication and the independence of Canada: issues of principle, convention, and law.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | European Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Law; Independence (probability theory); Convention; Political science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.017577792522435135,"score_gpt":0.26959810709522414,"score_spread":0.252020314572789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763678040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009423809,0.061001457,0.0020297517,0.08345288,0.0016599139,0.00006853846,0.00081363926,0.00006912122,0.8414809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3930366,0.030321974,0.0032753558,0.033169273,0.00088117603,0.00009081297,0.00043670405,0.00012997458,0.5386581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99640995,0.0003432377,0.00006919453,0.00025750796,0.0018155196,0.0011045118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974909,0.000660148,0.00010291701,0.00011107243,0.0012534057,0.00038143594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002042068,0.00036007632,0.0003763339,0.0013318469,0.013368457,0.009573731,0.0021166229,0.004555476,0.010572603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007424134,0.0003743084,0.0003044037,0.0026882258,0.016049339,0.0032269598,0.0020208913,0.0048758825,0.0009979289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011472016,0.000009714239,0.00045489558,0.00005373169,0.0000048583865,0.000079243626,0.003167814,0.00014709438,0.000085894935,0.843924,0.13910279,0.012958411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013140822,0.000005399019,0.00503071,0.00031761485,0.000015957408,0.00006916217,0.0045728227,0.00025925512,0.00026632712,0.11871143,0.8706965,0.000041660252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9803247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9927826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9398422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060157787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18274912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43647736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763767986","doi":"","title":"The digest of British Columbia case law, 1849-1904 : being the cases reported in volumes I to X, inclusive determined in [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.014917222063550995,"score_gpt":0.2625842070721502,"score_spread":0.24766698500859918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763767986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01846091,0.019339394,0.0007633536,0.039713033,0.0053992243,0.00020582604,0.034913313,0.00026152094,0.8809435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07498588,0.009536481,0.0008361123,0.007385121,0.0006414992,0.00021962258,0.009988034,0.00017875855,0.89622855],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842167,0.00009191751,0.000070831506,0.000116288735,0.0009111727,0.00038809076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966016,0.00073942455,0.0001785875,0.00016382204,0.0020610506,0.0002556246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012418613,0.00046606662,0.00032816507,0.005770625,0.009887863,0.005404862,0.0012271099,0.002906956,0.026132321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067612627,0.0005713391,0.00023727486,0.008723279,0.0027738817,0.0015001763,0.0011572945,0.002842196,0.006222958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000904206,0.0000055768865,0.00073170033,0.000053455387,0.0000019132503,0.000070701084,0.0014570159,0.00003427594,0.00008374218,0.015200005,0.9720354,0.010317138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002111307,0.0000026151492,0.012518628,0.0002363296,0.000006008465,0.00007504528,0.0024562604,0.000045127654,0.00021026467,0.0016828979,0.98274565,0.00001907368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94140047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97930443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05859953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032080475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04927858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2327612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763891033","doi":"","title":"Canada. Parliament. Senate. Task Force on the Meech Lake Constitutional Accord and on the Yukon and the Northwest Territories","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Task force; Task (project management); Political science; Geography; Law; Public administration; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.010951102969688854,"score_gpt":0.21565027810195025,"score_spread":0.2046991751322614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763891033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005671488,0.0060958513,0.00034445355,0.06972532,0.006117443,0.00049708236,0.061521947,0.0005515603,0.8494749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017663,0.0035053275,0.00056732877,0.020649416,0.0003080841,0.0003292459,0.0058213254,0.00035541365,0.9508009],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959751,0.00015584817,0.00016136232,0.00022516267,0.0019040027,0.0015785807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99345946,0.0006803603,0.00018891509,0.00017521497,0.004387547,0.0011084467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00267449,0.00089452957,0.0011850687,0.0039979364,0.0149554005,0.008846364,0.0027481199,0.0086743655,0.15721597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056091533,0.0013919371,0.0012289704,0.009252177,0.0018512689,0.0021451714,0.0024970316,0.007010255,0.03330833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036494563,0.00002887156,0.0011392725,0.00011341941,0.000014333121,0.0000836091,0.00029754642,0.000081998995,0.00011522002,0.018670605,0.9684483,0.010970392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033231605,0.0000057361185,0.009816208,0.0001947084,0.000029811157,0.00001547708,0.0006961268,0.00008105344,0.00019071145,0.0010107752,0.98787737,0.000048723123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98770756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99349046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15721597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057544615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18936159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5259398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764040649","doi":"","title":"Classic readings and Canadian cases in the philosophy of law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.034362380858312266,"score_gpt":0.26609349212921374,"score_spread":0.23173111127090146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764040649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025566525,0.018043902,0.0010954075,0.034830626,0.0016659325,0.000044815435,0.00041658385,0.00008320568,0.94126284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2364464,0.028313898,0.0038110607,0.020195195,0.0017220179,0.000110961235,0.00043415188,0.00021486264,0.7087515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973871,0.0003633096,0.00006783379,0.00026045195,0.001255401,0.00066581456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821067,0.0005686924,0.00006927326,0.0000879999,0.0008162528,0.0002472499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016362516,0.0011014941,0.0005176162,0.0071479375,0.019239066,0.011956416,0.0026783287,0.004704658,0.023093555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056811697,0.0006572138,0.000453338,0.011067258,0.025427638,0.0042640152,0.0018286305,0.006204722,0.0012696612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058884825,0.000006533364,0.000061986546,0.000042069783,0.0000016526624,0.000055246128,0.00379141,0.00008171003,0.000028742943,0.853423,0.13640632,0.0060954806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006764299,0.0000027060178,0.0006981055,0.0001795598,0.00000812905,0.000066215616,0.0031602194,0.00015221613,0.00006761304,0.09123051,0.90440375,0.000024243232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9843089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.991084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1571488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1571488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.099775136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97758794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764139733","doi":"","title":"The provincial statutes of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | European Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.014463431885332896,"score_gpt":0.24402072028462662,"score_spread":0.22955728839929374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764139733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010340747,0.009975323,0.0010082056,0.040599395,0.0019050969,0.0001989101,0.011220307,0.00027006376,0.92448187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09381124,0.005078251,0.0018855848,0.010236609,0.000220576,0.00014312338,0.0019109836,0.0001885395,0.88652515],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952348,0.00023501272,0.00013653438,0.0003221947,0.0024943408,0.0015771666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99444675,0.0004976469,0.00012696623,0.00023678174,0.0040294104,0.0006624066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015372151,0.0005620734,0.0006405318,0.0031867235,0.018585464,0.01058238,0.0022760276,0.0035014616,0.03595895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007901585,0.0012190569,0.0006347398,0.007582148,0.0033068212,0.001980811,0.0015400846,0.0054147937,0.0038488223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023517869,0.000022178385,0.0017414124,0.000082682614,0.000009480979,0.00006475799,0.0011674088,0.00028299575,0.00008981715,0.4384314,0.5385837,0.019500673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012055231,0.0000051356496,0.005045309,0.00015620988,0.0000125132065,0.000027573498,0.001069552,0.0002477302,0.000121323166,0.008050726,0.985213,0.000038895214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99703825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12802519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12802519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35643166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92889214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764262134","doi":"","title":"Canada's indigenous constitution","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Indigenous; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.015363577685405682,"score_gpt":0.23839583990779317,"score_spread":0.22303226222238748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764262134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041072452,0.0070721456,0.00028018103,0.02146918,0.0010761943,0.000071229646,0.002145121,0.00012420217,0.9636545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034920618,0.0030577958,0.00054228876,0.0063312557,0.00012395935,0.000047693247,0.00046044262,0.00008251491,0.95443344],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752444,0.000118977696,0.000045994875,0.00020094814,0.0013266158,0.0007830162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986665,0.00011885838,0.000025791214,0.00008618497,0.00086017174,0.00024241557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010230001,0.0005771674,0.00049910526,0.0022821506,0.020717656,0.00982382,0.0016695036,0.0028934923,0.049779166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033414282,0.000581262,0.00048046894,0.0033259478,0.004093929,0.0018763901,0.0018372462,0.005391557,0.0041159764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012757476,0.000023398086,0.00059796567,0.00007831539,0.000006386447,0.00009047531,0.002292216,0.00010957301,0.00008094369,0.32523692,0.6457969,0.025674181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032606324,0.0000021409173,0.001306591,0.000059966576,0.0000041815474,0.000019087394,0.0007953912,0.000026335454,0.000047638438,0.0028825426,0.994842,0.000010955095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99792516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09020874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09020874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2361642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65451324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764654819","doi":"10.21991/c93q04","title":"NELLES V. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO ET AL.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Art; Ancient history; Geography; History; Archaeology; Biology; Zoology","score_opus":0.03713018147208178,"score_gpt":0.2856270832470552,"score_spread":0.24849690177497344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764654819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015754694,0.0060383026,0.0004031882,0.08635001,0.0013740386,0.00016442627,0.0017714474,0.0000691082,0.8880748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13723354,0.0031709399,0.00056380243,0.06834188,0.00032948115,0.0001722443,0.0005172306,0.000059039652,0.78961176],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963666,0.00024504616,0.00008253853,0.00022699144,0.0016445168,0.001434152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725,0.0005907597,0.00012887095,0.00009967553,0.001209577,0.0007210268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020362902,0.00040698354,0.0003642248,0.00061874726,0.02167847,0.004215338,0.001265484,0.008180881,0.015569712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005005632,0.0007280188,0.0005115553,0.0008804981,0.002898102,0.0014258499,0.0016571388,0.0048243664,0.0019851471],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009495347,0.00003345036,0.006121497,0.00013458557,0.000021169171,0.0008361913,0.0067029987,0.00011521939,0.0009768667,0.15994924,0.8169469,0.008066906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004775069,0.000016109565,0.01449879,0.0002025459,0.000034969355,0.00010365089,0.002272294,0.000104805804,0.00038127688,0.00385735,0.9784212,0.000059217145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9746104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04203472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04203472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0787278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30498463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765402529","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12301","title":"Shared Parenting in Canada: Increasing Use But Continued Controversy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Statute; Statutory law; Presumption; Child custody; Political science; Child support; Psychology; Law; Family law; Criminology","score_opus":0.07694001248423663,"score_gpt":0.3333489573152807,"score_spread":0.25640894483104404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765402529","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007973439,0.8488504,0.00029142466,0.11797674,0.0018159883,0.000034221146,0.0007267744,0.00002863385,0.022302387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16459759,0.7721039,0.0015336515,0.055480886,0.0017568326,0.00006084617,0.00068673806,0.00008942,0.003690076],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96468216,0.0042847493,0.0023257209,0.0034276522,0.021751767,0.0035279114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8450943,0.044741653,0.008432441,0.003082136,0.09028865,0.008360869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035968706,0.0005729497,0.0021944072,0.012403465,0.010029305,0.0128346495,0.0076661,0.0044426373,0.0049993447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06484228,0.00080732396,0.0011074229,0.026864804,0.013173159,0.0047974633,0.003991988,0.006623696,0.00033247587],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001585957,0.0001059578,0.01876573,0.011499617,0.00037877803,0.000537658,0.009279312,0.00063643954,0.00031896823,0.12520027,0.20983262,0.62328607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005729234,0.00008456849,0.05937206,0.028233021,0.0004342933,0.00053249643,0.015562784,0.000431837,0.00035516146,0.0080677355,0.8866516,0.0002171746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9876699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99203944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17659824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17659824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37593186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9550293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766567649","doi":"","title":"Regulations of Nova Scotia.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Environmental science; Aeronautics; Engineering; Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.026870015229732543,"score_gpt":0.27276649601339575,"score_spread":0.24589648078366322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766567649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008148191,0.009676159,0.00040473236,0.021415632,0.003516971,0.0002702591,0.051114723,0.0006274141,0.90482587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010870414,0.0014440545,0.00034108708,0.0029570921,0.00007486225,0.00006513903,0.0031703115,0.000082094884,0.980995],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985379,0.00005757221,0.00007402958,0.00013054897,0.00082612864,0.0003738374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966298,0.0002856188,0.00010829325,0.00018410258,0.002431915,0.0003602742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061545754,0.00052561617,0.00043046128,0.0017335872,0.0045214146,0.0035866448,0.0011639833,0.0027950318,0.0992921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035794352,0.000636425,0.0003644085,0.0026863841,0.0007677667,0.0007557797,0.0008275897,0.0021602334,0.025473645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035400342,0.00001720108,0.0013253082,0.00011227558,0.0000047209232,0.0001693777,0.00028389003,0.00008200294,0.00034226483,0.014393948,0.96644473,0.016788997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008416388,0.000006137967,0.01090893,0.0001245024,0.000005199646,0.000042687687,0.00024636832,0.000059354785,0.0001462888,0.00038646403,0.9880497,0.000015807931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9683856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.987683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98062414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019375883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057303645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33216518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766855129","doi":"10.71781/1926","title":"Le secret sacramentel à l'épreuve du durcissement de la répression de la pédophilie : proposition de réforme du droit québécois à la lumière du droit français","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0178808685868683,"score_gpt":0.3196701635135064,"score_spread":0.3017892949266381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766855129","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3707487,0.005620675,0.004241497,0.10332242,0.0007700148,0.00017884192,0.00014325758,0.00003846111,0.51493615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9315171,0.00063545234,0.0005289798,0.0029043383,0.00005110848,0.00004301312,0.00002430007,0.000009795372,0.064286016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798644,0.0005393833,0.000042298034,0.00018323943,0.00038081832,0.00086780137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982369,0.00032266404,0.00018724937,0.0001408365,0.00061970967,0.00049250765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023670055,0.00037664667,0.0002946148,0.0006144166,0.012283447,0.006618317,0.001137306,0.0031069752,0.006864223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027915821,0.00023215964,0.00028522353,0.0005965451,0.024269873,0.0021000907,0.0035284597,0.0039486145,0.00040983874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006405466,0.00004695828,0.003903831,0.000115303665,0.000015618918,0.000727267,0.08398377,0.00031952374,0.0007655486,0.8832559,0.011033903,0.015768368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116508534,0.00018794839,0.03451844,0.0010953684,0.00008472516,0.0004674394,0.1860622,0.0013908872,0.0017758546,0.08320868,0.69093585,0.00015611573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76226735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8414031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23773265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036839496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055798393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4782654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766905284","doi":"","title":"Constitutional law of Canada: cases, notes, and materials","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.021637081244336717,"score_gpt":0.24374843697679835,"score_spread":0.22211135573246163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766905284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007208378,0.027386617,0.001356846,0.02467358,0.0011403832,0.00036795746,0.011749166,0.0002692132,0.9258479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12679617,0.0387199,0.0041661663,0.014639515,0.00068544765,0.00050692225,0.0052686874,0.0002672605,0.8089499],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670154,0.00016591146,0.00009077164,0.00019861908,0.0020183779,0.00082481315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712294,0.0008657763,0.0000867682,0.00016281534,0.0014368861,0.0003248538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015999638,0.00081459177,0.0006499162,0.006282619,0.014358711,0.010063398,0.0033791487,0.0046680775,0.037215587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065932437,0.0009841687,0.0005379656,0.013587671,0.006850036,0.0021922982,0.0015555233,0.0028333836,0.0031903896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012686923,0.0000313673,0.00046596085,0.00019596846,0.0000056969548,0.000114271745,0.001577135,0.00031611888,0.00014738698,0.26951745,0.7086052,0.01901087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008303723,0.00000408222,0.002684664,0.00034866272,0.000012971463,0.000054035347,0.0018494297,0.00019216038,0.00021134075,0.01060879,0.983988,0.000037524333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99637514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10261509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10261509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18271954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74452806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767083539","doi":"","title":"Equality Under Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Charter; Bill of rights; Multiculturalism; Common law; Public law; Sociology; Law and economics; Human rights","score_opus":0.06927528886844081,"score_gpt":0.37484842520672385,"score_spread":0.30557313633828304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767083539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054280804,0.012047788,0.00360817,0.024978815,0.00067285786,0.00008578495,0.000084746076,0.00001601031,0.95307773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67538744,0.020611595,0.0046944097,0.037250496,0.0014656858,0.00037810337,0.000235459,0.00006986923,0.25990695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841061,0.0048903697,0.00075212016,0.0021348363,0.0056522796,0.0024642663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958198,0.0013963907,0.00052156026,0.00067604944,0.0011407251,0.00044540543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071810656,0.00033977488,0.00086243235,0.0012840244,0.006195614,0.0090573905,0.0011734824,0.004805536,0.0110683385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015554882,0.00031767713,0.00046771643,0.0010773769,0.025126357,0.008013631,0.0052808607,0.004643463,0.0015696132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031595887,0.0000061176434,0.00014467169,0.000044803655,0.0000037299844,0.000027364635,0.0019304254,0.00003160916,0.00006466441,0.97976923,0.007941956,0.010032265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009839677,0.000026002486,0.0016445608,0.00045937824,0.000011836564,0.00011727646,0.0024157153,0.000055622837,0.00012570259,0.36991864,0.6252003,0.000015238188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06721721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054857243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06721721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0089469645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0194116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13365191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767096044","doi":"","title":"A digest of the Nova Scotia common law, equity, vice-admiralty and election reports : with notes of many unreported cases [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Equity (law); Law; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.031064517783099488,"score_gpt":0.28958763350594,"score_spread":0.25852311572284054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767096044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01393446,0.08920319,0.0015979379,0.14295664,0.051738188,0.00079825503,0.07144906,0.0013787954,0.62694347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017073663,0.016324868,0.0010015504,0.023418,0.004662352,0.0001547257,0.011928839,0.0004950245,0.924941],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988427,0.00008061673,0.000060153376,0.000051783845,0.0007867054,0.0001780755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99575377,0.0011083329,0.00023296637,0.00018146103,0.002345381,0.0003781125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001211322,0.00063860504,0.0003986322,0.004899097,0.0052518616,0.0035139052,0.0012096018,0.0025186758,0.04628156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052216016,0.00056744064,0.00038414978,0.008063925,0.001297017,0.0015682492,0.0010071952,0.0018719443,0.018262235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044609146,0.0000037443917,0.00012742581,0.00004849257,8.2760727e-7,0.000032300366,0.00017765272,0.000010503249,0.000067438945,0.00076387706,0.9950848,0.0036784231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026965217,0.0000053906965,0.0080805225,0.00013671788,0.0000029094022,0.0000841047,0.0006760581,0.000039572835,0.000106189815,0.0003915757,0.9904591,0.000015227091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7349834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8964936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26501662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012632916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020747352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53315467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767183016","doi":"","title":"The Canadian abridgment, second edition. Index to Canadian legal literature","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); History; Political science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.011439405573109275,"score_gpt":0.24320847779810317,"score_spread":0.2317690722249939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767183016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00072184525,0.2687532,0.00070054136,0.01944947,0.010265636,0.00011461426,0.026994513,0.0007041745,0.67229605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0056855446,0.11538023,0.0010985485,0.0030594424,0.0013987959,0.000068965484,0.007411488,0.00033445336,0.86556256],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896073,0.000030065945,0.000040261966,0.00008508977,0.0007376259,0.0001462432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758685,0.00018734117,0.0000646652,0.00006676435,0.0018223608,0.00027205053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058206473,0.0012902858,0.0010286592,0.014258659,0.0068669994,0.006210258,0.0020471418,0.00126994,0.24961688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00401229,0.00067545555,0.00053761987,0.029016051,0.0023668918,0.0038102167,0.001422086,0.0017462117,0.06102724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003452331,0.0000023981268,0.00007255268,0.0001298742,0.0000011576394,0.00001551045,0.000088513734,0.000021760925,0.000021065842,0.0032307445,0.9733209,0.023092134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.37463e-7,7.106006e-7,0.0005940401,0.00015560086,0.000002099659,0.000021914346,0.00011196314,0.000009770298,0.000011664323,0.0005383076,0.99854845,0.000004548722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9474969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9804591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.952653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04734701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06543771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83505166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767211926","doi":"","title":"Index to Canadian legal literature.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.013581806887710594,"score_gpt":0.253084069737223,"score_spread":0.23950226284951243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767211926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004652753,0.13816765,0.00029289396,0.012439206,0.0056637987,0.000101826095,0.023170419,0.00056776864,0.81913114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006650048,0.111941956,0.0011401617,0.006137036,0.0024331277,0.000095738804,0.013184674,0.0003065885,0.8581106],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992687,0.000032153446,0.00003575071,0.00006150158,0.00047080513,0.00013107294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970444,0.0003820911,0.000109022476,0.0000831245,0.0019346012,0.00044680052],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037534733,0.0015514495,0.0012326761,0.02455681,0.006275678,0.0049530077,0.001968461,0.0012960908,0.40161595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038459804,0.0005193378,0.00045125946,0.048615497,0.0019862934,0.0032187277,0.0017223441,0.0015504129,0.11740153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026784594,0.0000031626403,0.000053745014,0.00018878757,0.0000011132954,0.00001749107,0.000054351534,0.000016666745,0.0000152583825,0.0017180955,0.98061633,0.017312298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010728721,7.3649494e-7,0.00053549994,0.00031390315,0.0000025486943,0.000031963325,0.00012431465,0.0000096152235,0.000011378218,0.0007122633,0.99825186,0.0000047687686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85351723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9369765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40161595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033352945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031829786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85352224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767307520","doi":"","title":"Canada. Parliament Special Joint Committee of the Senate and of the House of Commons on the Constitution of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; House of Commons; Constitution; Law; Political science; House of Representatives; Select committee; Joint (building); Commons; Engineering; Legislature; Politics","score_opus":0.02065399785319405,"score_gpt":0.22025032827692562,"score_spread":0.19959633042373157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767307520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064565255,0.016306266,0.0009478664,0.18826266,0.013491017,0.0006863981,0.026523327,0.0006597294,0.74666625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027056511,0.0039570522,0.0011358204,0.031193936,0.000625557,0.00020796979,0.0028442263,0.0002528354,0.9327261],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937464,0.00023573746,0.00019233488,0.00046105354,0.003129524,0.002234825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99197936,0.00074643624,0.00018490771,0.0002683544,0.005218245,0.0016025879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028273505,0.0009795444,0.0010301793,0.0031135366,0.021437118,0.011216047,0.003401877,0.013266352,0.06825696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008007705,0.0015361082,0.0013108167,0.0046136105,0.0025011909,0.002395035,0.001975792,0.010871145,0.008366389],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002145904,0.00002121911,0.0003783453,0.000061685765,0.000009680043,0.00006999833,0.00027020666,0.00008518678,0.00011761696,0.033778876,0.9587569,0.0064288657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001598656,0.000004009884,0.0037183857,0.00008654542,0.00001642819,0.0000134689935,0.00040256284,0.000087873275,0.00013271354,0.0013151441,0.99416924,0.000037670437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9934837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106748275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.106748275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32241982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7745166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767383935","doi":"","title":"The amendment of the Constitution of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Amendment; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.013595512029155767,"score_gpt":0.22942090323124784,"score_spread":0.21582539120209207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767383935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034119647,0.015219328,0.0010135614,0.057716686,0.0025680289,0.000099946614,0.0014078927,0.00008609432,0.9184766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19604819,0.010407184,0.0028287272,0.040282726,0.0012750351,0.00020613025,0.00074390514,0.00019409369,0.748014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926569,0.00065494917,0.00018782637,0.0006135404,0.003658907,0.0022279772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99569845,0.0006049467,0.00010609357,0.0003057175,0.002808973,0.0004758585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027606913,0.0006795702,0.00072354794,0.002287122,0.01824781,0.011733714,0.0022608582,0.008706136,0.0165539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010735335,0.000872048,0.00068742485,0.003483489,0.0103130005,0.0030632652,0.00194446,0.009048403,0.0017358888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010528044,0.000009467133,0.00020367702,0.00003197691,0.00000462546,0.00003915233,0.00097586826,0.00012725925,0.00005676766,0.83604926,0.1569864,0.005504989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014545302,0.0000045550237,0.001631885,0.00019813793,0.000013979132,0.000024842313,0.0006523274,0.00010864178,0.00012034462,0.03365401,0.963538,0.00003885952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9913112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10099529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10099529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25134557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73277557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767431662","doi":"","title":"The revised statutes of British Columbia, 1979 : a revision and consolidation of the public general acts of the Legislature of British [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Consolidation (business); Legislature; Political science; Law; Public administration; Business; Accounting","score_opus":0.012478511811981395,"score_gpt":0.22920928166946017,"score_spread":0.21673076985747877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767431662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05087836,0.04214795,0.0040182774,0.09204657,0.013251497,0.0009618973,0.044620954,0.00095032016,0.7511242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15761507,0.017262386,0.00883055,0.021237578,0.00075320504,0.0005528194,0.0095310705,0.0003237416,0.7838936],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931096,0.0004346125,0.00034317098,0.00038409178,0.0043467283,0.0013817977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889498,0.0010050407,0.00030362804,0.00028507574,0.008895056,0.000561533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032849917,0.00062525907,0.0004800313,0.004566504,0.008945358,0.006391975,0.002916141,0.003510292,0.009402311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011924648,0.0008678036,0.0003892393,0.009207934,0.0034586787,0.0012294574,0.0013455099,0.005074899,0.002590059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003770003,0.000028668857,0.0024315217,0.00015664828,0.000011018162,0.0001373969,0.003662389,0.00045778006,0.00036289546,0.072929725,0.87116355,0.048620567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011622228,0.0000063840835,0.018995574,0.00023047187,0.000021137663,0.000027032775,0.0017173052,0.00017850277,0.0003273224,0.0015950571,0.97683483,0.00005487903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9921131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10018698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10018698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25378388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7269108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767516010","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal tenure in the Constitution of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012639949169152752,"score_gpt":0.256854428692721,"score_spread":0.24421447952356826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767516010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030285636,0.03249025,0.0005947388,0.062297057,0.0016701319,0.00008918288,0.0008341375,0.00007379389,0.87166506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49882635,0.014859218,0.0010216394,0.012282629,0.0005095224,0.000079653844,0.0002997522,0.00010056772,0.47202072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973115,0.00021541923,0.00005023872,0.00016149964,0.0008057236,0.0014556672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815035,0.00028808104,0.000067661225,0.000077454584,0.0009471381,0.0004693098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013168142,0.00034024715,0.00047972915,0.0013866983,0.029091706,0.010471349,0.0016534005,0.003134469,0.011997715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038738744,0.00048398375,0.0002837156,0.003493662,0.009777342,0.0017310189,0.0017417769,0.0048435014,0.00066750025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022938353,0.000019168418,0.0016558014,0.00007661286,0.000009291224,0.00017459776,0.017800763,0.00027948688,0.00011465207,0.7919959,0.16702817,0.020822724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009868375,0.000009294825,0.009633512,0.0002924571,0.000019084804,0.000058768688,0.013836656,0.00014404726,0.00012283282,0.020975098,0.9548541,0.000044341814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13007316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13007316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30191556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9437512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767621528","doi":"","title":"The provincial statutes of Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.011717239307851264,"score_gpt":0.23173875473567926,"score_spread":0.220021515427828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767621528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003978014,0.02733374,0.00083901593,0.029127207,0.0020314406,0.00010896177,0.030256066,0.00033046977,0.90599525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06932865,0.013060031,0.0017769925,0.0067578093,0.0002627659,0.000090045316,0.006667006,0.00022059535,0.9018361],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813867,0.00006797864,0.000046081215,0.00011151501,0.0011228576,0.00051286677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972601,0.00016827614,0.00006542399,0.00007352113,0.0021509968,0.00028172188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006277622,0.00056122325,0.00041583576,0.0025815377,0.009648508,0.0051867818,0.0012727082,0.001717034,0.049728114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003959445,0.0005984879,0.00037864802,0.0069955694,0.0017573402,0.001629225,0.0008230162,0.0025215754,0.006659657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011990069,0.000009692903,0.0011619562,0.00006450179,0.000003651791,0.000034966994,0.0004555161,0.00010858856,0.000049669023,0.08152933,0.8938099,0.022760313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043750106,0.0000025255745,0.0056995824,0.00011844798,0.0000070211004,0.000022574179,0.0005959544,0.0001041887,0.00007666519,0.002614552,0.9907391,0.000015047773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0781534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0781534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20402536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5670453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767694151","doi":"10.7202/1055264ar","title":"Parental Alienation in Quebec Custody Litigation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Skepticism; Child custody; Criminology; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.009424843567067616,"score_gpt":0.26389414738746453,"score_spread":0.2544693038203969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767694151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94728696,0.0032862024,0.0003162411,0.005784282,0.00008914616,0.000055860877,0.00010801674,0.000008420856,0.043064877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99299955,0.0010082468,0.00008447762,0.0011732371,0.000016908563,0.000022292352,0.00003383695,0.0000037058055,0.0046578394],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993111,0.002175241,0.0002519982,0.00046554624,0.0021075066,0.0018886424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99035347,0.0046056407,0.002275027,0.00028803461,0.0016174554,0.00086043426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005070798,0.00026724956,0.0003640472,0.0026214535,0.02240986,0.0040827,0.0013600308,0.0024461788,0.0041172234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017308917,0.0002795908,0.00033945596,0.004322666,0.0093431445,0.0017280756,0.004868637,0.0025504988,0.00015854821],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098139906,0.00013708138,0.17292517,0.00022162577,0.000052576615,0.017822042,0.66035795,0.00081258325,0.00074931816,0.09662408,0.015171785,0.035027687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026603282,0.00009068683,0.3818973,0.0011453481,0.00005865684,0.0069695828,0.47906202,0.0009028423,0.00071286375,0.004627135,0.12434679,0.0001600749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91506565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.962666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084934354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04926406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036187828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35743743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770740075","doi":"10.1080/01419870.2017.1400086","title":"Labour migration, sex, and polygyny: negotiating patriarchy in Tajikistan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnic and Racial Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Polygyny; Patriarchy; Negotiation; Institution; Gender studies; Sociology; Reification (Marxism); Political science; Law; Demography; Population; Social science","score_opus":0.083638196602274,"score_gpt":0.41651201075264693,"score_spread":0.3328738141503729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770740075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99696004,0.00017393475,0.00007501172,0.00034134675,0.0000035106273,0.0000024444496,0.0000031398074,4.970721e-7,0.0024400419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995875,0.00010497837,0.00002847677,0.000049996688,0.0000013844041,0.0000013118691,0.0000018225089,3.5615182e-7,0.00022409314],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986895,0.0008024935,0.000030612115,0.000058600606,0.00007185788,0.00034689944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991928,0.00025350344,0.00031979222,0.000042429612,0.00004973361,0.0001417249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015587572,0.00018212263,0.00016557114,0.0007000987,0.005485499,0.0022251,0.00052354834,0.00040306672,0.0018026105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018299993,0.00022706676,0.00010113292,0.0011658269,0.007909114,0.0012413729,0.0023333426,0.0007141257,0.00008304968],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086911314,0.00013710804,0.5108542,0.00006996192,0.00004861317,0.0024436337,0.4357414,0.00017337255,0.0011643185,0.02123245,0.0004612586,0.027586767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001272993,0.00010907615,0.43910077,0.00010217715,0.000024939827,0.0005829446,0.54844224,0.00022220297,0.00024478088,0.003118991,0.008016338,0.000022778679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03225854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07802555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03225854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014145552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001885384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06414157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771338716","doi":"","title":"Statutes of the province of British Columbia.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.011061991967252879,"score_gpt":0.2258454273981806,"score_spread":0.2147834354309277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771338716","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006615857,0.012272027,0.00058501045,0.014857604,0.0018107396,0.0002141077,0.11051178,0.0004512655,0.8526816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03318294,0.004553434,0.0007580043,0.0028438629,0.00010175555,0.00014878609,0.01452735,0.00012767898,0.9437563],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860233,0.000068614914,0.000059201735,0.00011559003,0.0007362904,0.0004180208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99672383,0.00025847126,0.00008410409,0.00012007702,0.002560318,0.00025321153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005609355,0.00062992424,0.00054683647,0.0032430643,0.00771281,0.0041143233,0.0015991392,0.0021331008,0.07379972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036754764,0.00076027855,0.0003143028,0.00864654,0.0009941908,0.0010168891,0.0007335229,0.0027756526,0.012023884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002259989,0.000017045926,0.0017030212,0.00011518576,0.000006855413,0.00006956889,0.00029955342,0.00013938965,0.000095644646,0.023145476,0.9536059,0.020779794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000124238395,0.000005276537,0.019164152,0.00022808624,0.000015340136,0.000034778914,0.00086277,0.00018468627,0.00016917568,0.0015088109,0.97778326,0.00003118573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9929409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99735665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9613089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038691122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08944505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.280725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771411220","doi":"","title":"Politics and the constitution: the charter, federalism, and the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Supreme court; Political science; Constitution; Law; Politics; Charter","score_opus":0.014586119060234892,"score_gpt":0.22925503496932054,"score_spread":0.21466891590908566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771411220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013187031,0.05950428,0.0013087372,0.14367172,0.0011265404,0.000041341573,0.0006926881,0.00006295798,0.78040475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6057946,0.025364405,0.0016099698,0.025730304,0.00106171,0.0000774704,0.000362041,0.00012179439,0.33987767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978818,0.00024606072,0.00003219179,0.00019039738,0.0008243869,0.00082511915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987908,0.00043138166,0.00007097246,0.000059697413,0.00041360658,0.00023353344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012246193,0.00044525703,0.00044455915,0.0016041854,0.01643779,0.013457326,0.0017733452,0.005505934,0.011883565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005107043,0.0004935441,0.0003155025,0.0041239313,0.019221785,0.0035226266,0.001446396,0.00530279,0.00070193055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007012936,0.000006291429,0.00034646483,0.000021084494,0.000002922872,0.000037740298,0.0024361159,0.00017620897,0.0000295067,0.9060926,0.08486083,0.005983337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023193526,0.000005371179,0.0058393474,0.00038696086,0.000019543468,0.000040834842,0.0060689296,0.00050591707,0.00012718528,0.22538608,0.7615521,0.000044611803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98871887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99541485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.897052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.102947995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19795494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7469435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771418444","doi":"","title":"Law Reform Commission of Saskatchewan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Law; Political science; Law reform","score_opus":0.02233169521134484,"score_gpt":0.27805564388086423,"score_spread":0.2557239486695194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771418444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07846688,0.005547899,0.0010749436,0.08704595,0.002562277,0.0009507932,0.03373191,0.0005743597,0.790045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0623,0.0017101021,0.0012277254,0.009350184,0.00007634645,0.00043247882,0.0028350728,0.00010478472,0.9219633],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963677,0.00030039155,0.00014801639,0.0004044215,0.0014925088,0.0012869771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99284184,0.0014025507,0.00024577448,0.0006183515,0.003673886,0.0012176104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018641212,0.0006339668,0.0008177274,0.0030491378,0.010796702,0.009048185,0.0017879639,0.0036238972,0.05948741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006914052,0.0015552347,0.000663458,0.004184407,0.0018568718,0.0019162903,0.0030591877,0.006169538,0.0061502396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028571338,0.00019662821,0.01779966,0.0003791079,0.0001506875,0.0011694691,0.0021993697,0.00078712887,0.0018588258,0.17606062,0.73906815,0.060044665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011832902,0.00003226176,0.06620697,0.00044018956,0.00007589621,0.00011082428,0.00423151,0.0009291792,0.0012466591,0.007247,0.9192408,0.00012042166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9639141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99014306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069039784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.069039784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26663908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.500921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771757530","doi":"10.1007/s10691-018-9364-5","title":"Judging in Marriage’s Shadow","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cohabitation; Shadow (psychology); Openness to experience; Operationalization; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Law; Property (philosophy); Diversity (politics); Political science; Social psychology; Gender studies; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.062378099473101266,"score_gpt":0.37685382608982915,"score_spread":0.3144757266167279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771757530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33225238,0.00066065113,0.0033159202,0.01820295,0.00033240364,0.00003505409,0.00007058439,0.00001870757,0.6451113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99426115,0.0000610263,0.0003437747,0.00039763952,0.000035024677,0.0000050526596,0.000011353468,0.00001128703,0.0048735775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939138,0.003053566,0.00017203252,0.00080714567,0.001055557,0.0009978404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863767,0.006813317,0.0011083949,0.0016117918,0.0025382712,0.0015515351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063931686,0.0001808616,0.00043423023,0.0018627997,0.010802071,0.0065373946,0.0011699894,0.0019096131,0.017534398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0287626,0.00025013788,0.00023779324,0.0018306326,0.020367678,0.007378772,0.0043556523,0.0034336024,0.00067214714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073421026,0.00004660373,0.00837784,0.00003689722,0.0000075901166,0.0002486489,0.0732118,0.00009665676,0.00029748707,0.88500375,0.0060666706,0.026532618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032243574,0.00007129263,0.024062594,0.00016475325,0.000017724235,0.0002527982,0.20445482,0.0008591593,0.0014780827,0.66308725,0.10548274,0.000036541493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01847067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033315055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01847067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045621535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004264333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05865842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772613778","doi":"10.51644/mwyf2203","title":"The Crucifixion in Matthew and the Theology of the Cross in Canada Today","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Consensus","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.02523755488948634,"score_gpt":0.3144090435610515,"score_spread":0.28917148867156517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772613778","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29535168,0.021221865,0.0021463267,0.4264941,0.0018333503,0.000045361357,0.0001994957,0.000043499545,0.2526644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9585427,0.002257895,0.0005612763,0.013918171,0.0001496916,0.000015483007,0.00002438487,0.00003837691,0.02449203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912514,0.0017786728,0.00025831652,0.0012285582,0.0021608702,0.003322173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98601806,0.0047997516,0.0006320877,0.00060643855,0.0050464426,0.0028971103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009348195,0.00037103987,0.00079902227,0.0025675602,0.048214313,0.016495058,0.0034867532,0.008574635,0.008298435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023685236,0.00048879295,0.00034725343,0.0041577597,0.04831822,0.007638222,0.006324326,0.0128572285,0.0002827238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003548392,0.000017525204,0.0025241433,0.00006200184,0.000013548563,0.00021632516,0.10969835,0.00021148293,0.00012754083,0.84590566,0.025684154,0.015503792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003376559,0.000023999492,0.01290897,0.0010363638,0.000050688348,0.00021495203,0.34176862,0.00066257926,0.000513491,0.18447454,0.45805696,0.00025511644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98851764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99372816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12018008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12018008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23736013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8719716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774018368","doi":"","title":"Ontario. Legislative Assembly. Select Committee on Constitutional Reform","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Legislative assembly; General assembly; Public administration; Law; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.031193738358511316,"score_gpt":0.28358908336297406,"score_spread":0.25239534500446276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774018368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009962702,0.00515486,0.0004312289,0.038362157,0.005235535,0.0011394658,0.052698206,0.0008886776,0.8950935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030190465,0.0017745867,0.0005433608,0.009457385,0.00055755966,0.0005362745,0.006645065,0.0002361608,0.9772305],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911588,0.00041563157,0.00037738198,0.0006956905,0.005492976,0.0018596067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98896897,0.0011569606,0.00029461586,0.0006225917,0.0077214395,0.0012353318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047569647,0.0013560208,0.0018321457,0.0060653044,0.013223377,0.0072445073,0.0038023153,0.008876996,0.2782329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00919035,0.0020407913,0.0013503914,0.010473098,0.002736769,0.0025009925,0.0019325552,0.0060924147,0.11523036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016533644,0.0000108626,0.000118798285,0.00008629162,0.0000035046498,0.00002111491,0.00007418194,0.000020808438,0.000070079026,0.0038811723,0.9903278,0.005369002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001655992,0.00000252761,0.0018816998,0.0001056876,0.000008316985,0.0000034551492,0.00010259109,0.000019820462,0.00006040995,0.00031178287,0.99747664,0.000010530393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95291525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9804866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9424027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057597294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.122607656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9307818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774451565","doi":"10.1163/22134514-00404001","title":"Tribal Courts, Restorative Justice and Native Land Claims","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Restorative justice; Political science; Sovereignty; Federal jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Treaty; Economic Justice; Devolution (biology); Government (linguistics); Eminent domain; Sociology; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.06678477496682644,"score_gpt":0.3497930897305864,"score_spread":0.28300831476376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774451565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5141713,0.014415599,0.0023748828,0.037364833,0.00023197923,0.00003909057,0.000041648582,0.000013806329,0.43134683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99580526,0.0009854969,0.00011457591,0.0007479051,0.000069985435,0.0000090245285,0.0000052474006,0.0000020439081,0.0022604193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954731,0.0021768534,0.00016927348,0.0003082098,0.0007163619,0.0011561959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99063474,0.0053497967,0.0017011268,0.00043781436,0.0009647917,0.0009117206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003954513,0.00013011096,0.00028442222,0.0022809317,0.009227304,0.008045744,0.001509982,0.0042499555,0.0057392595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0130332,0.00017866986,0.00026880967,0.0023995293,0.034605872,0.0057134815,0.0053043626,0.0032344041,0.00022536627],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000098504415,0.000069195004,0.0038457897,0.000031776366,0.0000062323384,0.00042082253,0.014964471,0.0001953579,0.000049817336,0.9728476,0.0015867356,0.0059722485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035642497,0.00006523199,0.02281745,0.00051995245,0.000028109034,0.00071395456,0.10275198,0.0012177837,0.00022653256,0.8165548,0.055013023,0.00005548487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03418127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049462058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03418127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006114024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005635337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06796461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775341244","doi":"","title":"L’Adoption Coutumière Autochtone En Droit Civil Québécois (Aboriginal Customary Adoption in Quebec Civil Law)","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Civil code; Ethnology; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012231628454707072,"score_gpt":0.2926983594370931,"score_spread":0.28046673098238606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775341244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8654448,0.004241506,0.0009571508,0.011839999,0.00027861862,0.00011688534,0.00084427465,0.000043942415,0.11623285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9188855,0.0009975852,0.00038307873,0.0008061148,0.000021996557,0.00003405727,0.00011538316,0.000011838818,0.07874437],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990615,0.00021361961,0.000028860026,0.000105184714,0.00020535548,0.00038559566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738437,0.0006842593,0.00024937256,0.00013816202,0.0011204553,0.00042342747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014343809,0.00023235627,0.00015864862,0.0006964214,0.006472054,0.0015646413,0.00069807674,0.0008928082,0.013165908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028161604,0.0001845993,0.00015195462,0.001250378,0.003313435,0.0006300582,0.001024562,0.0015871449,0.0004740445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018961026,0.0001983593,0.1626941,0.000598119,0.00005944519,0.005218551,0.37741807,0.0014126746,0.0050687566,0.18287487,0.09940756,0.16485995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000236699,0.00012598406,0.56895304,0.000522589,0.000034124823,0.00072102324,0.07937529,0.00080583675,0.0011589716,0.0014506646,0.3467191,0.00010978145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9899553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99430805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03684978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03684978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03688914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26736516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2776271098","doi":"","title":"Canada. Parliament. Senate. Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.0143312980784976,"score_gpt":0.23514069162671264,"score_spread":0.22080939354821505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2776271098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010774087,0.005725085,0.0004430485,0.051596206,0.008546662,0.00065321784,0.07693775,0.0011941988,0.8538264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0062004807,0.0026927649,0.00062995957,0.016523957,0.0005255266,0.00033397396,0.00794782,0.0005738463,0.9645716],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99201936,0.00030105855,0.000255384,0.0005205687,0.0046674376,0.00223622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98613966,0.00084898365,0.00023953879,0.00040045628,0.010608902,0.0017623253],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039381445,0.0016490002,0.0019950534,0.006065868,0.016110778,0.011043466,0.004394441,0.010181977,0.31465024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008529922,0.0017656367,0.0016314533,0.012201584,0.002859816,0.0030660245,0.002399819,0.009090014,0.13764971],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019999308,0.000013204348,0.00016679711,0.00007983604,0.00000719776,0.000028010283,0.000050378476,0.00003134518,0.000057855024,0.00608034,0.9874829,0.0059820334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015877242,0.000003072143,0.0019025655,0.00012281537,0.000014074159,0.000006838205,0.00014021315,0.000052784664,0.000110684734,0.00065879576,0.9969464,0.000025915486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98503196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92285484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.077145174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2087142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97756827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2776499986","doi":"","title":"Canadian Bar Association. Committee on the Constitution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Political science; Law; Geography; Philosophy; Epistemology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.02225858791491755,"score_gpt":0.25905644196071254,"score_spread":0.23679785404579498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2776499986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012200808,0.010698398,0.0005621494,0.07993622,0.014619442,0.0004843298,0.01831068,0.0006538636,0.8735148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009148441,0.00430536,0.0013549724,0.028523147,0.0012183074,0.00035714803,0.0045995875,0.00036240625,0.9501306],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853559,0.0006136916,0.0006587118,0.00091859314,0.009771372,0.0026816847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98053724,0.0015957278,0.0003983575,0.00087987573,0.014955128,0.0016336674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062340144,0.0013068283,0.0015026061,0.006456154,0.014392011,0.01166555,0.005458679,0.01922512,0.106451586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018250322,0.0020534417,0.001888928,0.0090632085,0.0038365014,0.0031847914,0.002397099,0.016414808,0.038390372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012895577,0.00001848856,0.00013069675,0.000043264183,0.0000038148933,0.000022436538,0.00007404979,0.000036170783,0.000048499212,0.020119604,0.97358453,0.0059054904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009863188,0.0000024040755,0.0020359072,0.00016087567,0.000012078477,0.000007993931,0.00013912038,0.000030925945,0.00006313822,0.0014557607,0.9960576,0.000024188757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9653545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106451586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04896406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1934499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35611606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2777629159","doi":"","title":"The revised statutes of New Brunswick","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.022632421529018714,"score_gpt":0.26659648172331113,"score_spread":0.24396406019429243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2777629159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003161519,0.012387962,0.0018531366,0.03603759,0.0063599106,0.0004990142,0.015427437,0.00032478909,0.9239486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0115845045,0.0044403304,0.0026316906,0.0074487883,0.00019767736,0.00024779828,0.00283217,0.00017286872,0.9704441],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917748,0.00059772603,0.000566631,0.0008161139,0.0045407857,0.0017038862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921747,0.0010083676,0.00022904291,0.00060466956,0.0056251674,0.00035805878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004048379,0.000987194,0.00080792996,0.006474231,0.010216361,0.01405746,0.0037090569,0.0052636955,0.05187726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014088039,0.0018444379,0.0009523401,0.01276948,0.0042228703,0.004274495,0.002220969,0.009653235,0.010955112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021700416,0.000023152554,0.00064913253,0.000110483736,0.0000076153838,0.000111157584,0.0014538513,0.00019706694,0.00019458891,0.3516127,0.61905473,0.026563777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049850933,0.0000018832618,0.0017240711,0.0001517867,0.000005854961,0.000018397019,0.00046488165,0.00004420288,0.00009395396,0.0038885223,0.9935743,0.000027080812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9778306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9891943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09990123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09990123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21026133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72483754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2777969974","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttx189","title":"The rights of unmarried cohabitants in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Political science; Socioeconomics; Geography; Law; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.02349824235038778,"score_gpt":0.30121249559153,"score_spread":0.27771425324114224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2777969974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90379745,0.0044047474,0.00013420307,0.00565611,0.00008174524,0.00006912717,0.0010711794,0.00001107731,0.08477431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899738,0.0023282447,0.00008798996,0.00071512145,0.000012076541,0.000010443324,0.00021392955,0.0000046518026,0.0066538965],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825877,0.00012268033,0.000048294085,0.000090674985,0.0005708466,0.0009087466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99560046,0.00041542572,0.00052886247,0.00010849788,0.0016304502,0.0017162832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086337177,0.00013740337,0.00023884643,0.0020556462,0.012336652,0.0029943304,0.0013176509,0.0006103078,0.00493351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040693493,0.00016194308,0.00016310815,0.0036084724,0.0030813387,0.0008503396,0.0020217935,0.0011421932,0.00020761034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017779898,0.00023838147,0.5618552,0.00026244903,0.000057245714,0.002150302,0.13945521,0.00067887316,0.00068879424,0.057407193,0.044329938,0.19269857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015746691,0.00004251368,0.71924174,0.0004929251,0.00003874611,0.0004901388,0.1827902,0.00062844175,0.00031658766,0.0021564711,0.09372242,0.00006402768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99498194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03296251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03296251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06613967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23916084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778461173","doi":"10.1177/092405190001800403","title":"Multiculturalism, Human Rights, and Cultural Relativism: Canadian Civic Leaders Discuss Women's Rights and Gay and Lesbian Rights","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Lesbian; Cultural relativism; Human rights; Relativism; Ethnic group; Sociology; Minority rights; Political science; Citizenship; Gender studies; Homosexuality; Law; Perspective (graphical); Politics","score_opus":0.02340903723594115,"score_gpt":0.29607799619340064,"score_spread":0.27266895895745946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778461173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91748035,0.0014137151,0.00017846336,0.023306187,0.00007593958,0.000032368207,0.000019702386,0.0000055504374,0.057487767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99366224,0.0004958858,0.000096190066,0.0009778705,0.00001578188,0.000008616663,0.000009096134,0.0000028775191,0.004731384],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960924,0.0010523369,0.000039670507,0.00014797042,0.0009923701,0.0016753532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951438,0.0014510377,0.0004332562,0.00009336106,0.0008115184,0.0020670425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037109694,0.00030755065,0.00029662772,0.0015622489,0.036405306,0.006767145,0.00096886215,0.0017939559,0.003313342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053022117,0.0001740091,0.00018478684,0.0017437547,0.020397922,0.0023115869,0.0045594648,0.0034308087,0.00013051057],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026381633,0.00009333587,0.042994358,0.000049159084,0.000007121347,0.0002783188,0.90604985,0.00009502267,0.00033710603,0.025693549,0.004863435,0.01951245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000082756305,0.000030316993,0.04718068,0.00010806832,0.000007973183,0.000059663296,0.89648044,0.00009349779,0.00015821817,0.002633008,0.053217847,0.000021925407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9410809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97605944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058919072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048392713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.066033274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35111535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779615805","doi":"","title":"Statutes of Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.015178446453571437,"score_gpt":0.23935585447260557,"score_spread":0.22417740801903413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779615805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016515973,0.0088613145,0.00041863314,0.01365204,0.0014319471,0.00017050043,0.05343687,0.0004680356,0.919909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01215728,0.004150138,0.00066959136,0.005369584,0.0001394942,0.000118224496,0.008778019,0.00019588042,0.96842176],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99642843,0.0001074455,0.000089141395,0.00025081806,0.0022256656,0.00089864235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99592775,0.00023213298,0.000075780554,0.00013113537,0.003303541,0.0003297661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009295687,0.0009594969,0.0008298718,0.0036947955,0.011414761,0.007044804,0.0022882484,0.0034892473,0.12511362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004837261,0.0011099074,0.00067718554,0.008900024,0.0014243922,0.001924602,0.001306386,0.0040572463,0.035437245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011283942,0.000014968109,0.00045559194,0.000050479568,0.0000036293125,0.000030264628,0.00012692885,0.00006580783,0.0000426682,0.025200255,0.9619383,0.0120597705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007110038,0.0000032275896,0.0028557866,0.00009339033,0.0000068275513,0.000016893566,0.00022699316,0.00007627372,0.00007980203,0.0013147986,0.995301,0.000017870236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99312866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99668044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12511362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06484302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16379978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47047126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780547325","doi":"","title":"The local and private statutes of New Brunswick.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.016244341644738272,"score_gpt":0.2514804239920463,"score_spread":0.23523608234730803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780547325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004292029,0.036144372,0.00066409993,0.016614284,0.0016193676,0.000120792196,0.017288577,0.00017734252,0.92307925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031566955,0.009160913,0.00081898394,0.0023557334,0.000092224436,0.0000841907,0.0034633281,0.00013547597,0.9523223],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992173,0.000053543128,0.000045947567,0.00009967787,0.00031343818,0.00027012764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990075,0.00018079959,0.000058144902,0.000078714926,0.0005602013,0.00011469339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005477912,0.00062438013,0.00035451542,0.0027672458,0.004602904,0.0042292555,0.0014622847,0.0014614279,0.05971618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025918542,0.0008079477,0.00025222375,0.008199446,0.0021376305,0.0027252792,0.0010057517,0.0027752444,0.009043278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027741273,0.000020395137,0.0022925928,0.00017037355,0.0000066465113,0.00016913444,0.0022932347,0.00022849717,0.0002011481,0.17600527,0.7576616,0.06092337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003492627,0.0000017457681,0.005406331,0.0001433955,0.0000042336746,0.000030775434,0.0013766874,0.00004071328,0.00008797088,0.003298188,0.989592,0.000014493777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98181564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05971618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05941844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07348454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43111295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782614011","doi":"","title":"The Role of Religion in the Law of Royal Succession in Canada and Australia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological succession; Commonwealth; Law; Constitution; Political science; Scrutiny; Common law; Sociology","score_opus":0.012194579175248238,"score_gpt":0.2939854007706863,"score_spread":0.28179082159543806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782614011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11608888,0.3953653,0.0012025884,0.04149991,0.0011025905,0.000061083716,0.00016750679,0.000035467834,0.44447666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7815538,0.16434565,0.0013086945,0.011947757,0.0002471707,0.00002756454,0.00009777949,0.000024450259,0.040447026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758804,0.00029872134,0.00008083229,0.00019250733,0.0011546817,0.0006851134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760216,0.00081155455,0.00021223944,0.000054535874,0.0010190194,0.0003004266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016573385,0.00013881935,0.00027222157,0.0018399942,0.0064331996,0.004704794,0.0008730657,0.0011826324,0.001614218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047422373,0.00016737626,0.00025048462,0.002656381,0.009582837,0.0012464343,0.001213381,0.00191794,0.00011808607],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003165912,0.00002085969,0.00439561,0.0008843743,0.000025368996,0.00084704254,0.019949215,0.0009123215,0.00055959,0.8541625,0.02369032,0.09452108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012944432,0.000030146288,0.053481203,0.0024016604,0.000060777074,0.000400275,0.013120595,0.0005009344,0.0005667973,0.029292025,0.900045,0.00008765915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9746261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9857442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067681484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.067681484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.106003426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49106586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783656184","doi":"","title":"Translating the Conflict over Trinity Western University's Proposed Law School","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisprudence; Statutory law; Political science; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Public law; Appeal; Sociology; Common law","score_opus":0.034728431730384104,"score_gpt":0.31589921171628577,"score_spread":0.2811707799859017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783656184","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018566176,0.00231693,0.0030723962,0.74916005,0.0056778872,0.00007828503,0.00006567437,0.00013951573,0.22092313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4272481,0.0013417903,0.0045549115,0.27208212,0.0013536921,0.0003181125,0.000057336285,0.00020990553,0.29283404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98727524,0.0046646204,0.00049398205,0.0015023455,0.0028299694,0.0032339813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869429,0.0046937196,0.00054734095,0.0006788882,0.0025991655,0.0045380513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012982327,0.00046693176,0.0005805115,0.0014167501,0.029894434,0.026131947,0.0031662425,0.022638177,0.013954556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02445025,0.00085583667,0.0005793276,0.0010710536,0.030944502,0.007947094,0.012840112,0.028560553,0.0019470869],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007820497,0.0000148558165,0.0002218736,0.000019099367,0.0000021517833,0.00026101395,0.007992841,0.00005504598,0.00008370408,0.9132601,0.074741796,0.0033397123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025801219,0.00005102044,0.0008730779,0.00046165736,0.000009240965,0.00017667869,0.018647358,0.00047536398,0.00036031505,0.11013833,0.86868536,0.00009575424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19007175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42098317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80992824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042954925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07153121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37793082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783926903","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0025","title":"Women’s rights and minorities’ rights in Canada. The challenges of intersectionality in Supreme Court jurisprudence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Intersectionality; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Adjudication; Gender equality; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.034550493574795255,"score_gpt":0.3060064664540142,"score_spread":0.27145597287921897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783926903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29727602,0.014874808,0.0032785789,0.14043254,0.00061106076,0.00011758062,0.00017379328,0.00004453856,0.54319113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749274,0.0016525435,0.00091278047,0.0056136344,0.000073887146,0.00003452436,0.00002239582,0.000017689908,0.01674506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98886,0.0018523361,0.00020933643,0.0008798612,0.0041857264,0.0040127467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99394447,0.0028414899,0.00030907473,0.00022796178,0.0014834068,0.0011935057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006941372,0.00041164574,0.00083398377,0.002137615,0.053758893,0.01893133,0.0030279327,0.006983863,0.00414219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00990413,0.0005529691,0.0006473316,0.0033151046,0.04661859,0.003440709,0.008144965,0.008796055,0.00016052347],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012629892,0.000015983167,0.0015429877,0.000036215988,0.000010115261,0.0003926847,0.03323041,0.00025697582,0.00017630118,0.95208657,0.0046119634,0.007627162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007041469,0.000051226307,0.02366453,0.0013187572,0.00011334626,0.0004757447,0.1980122,0.0029979914,0.0014269694,0.37021333,0.40131226,0.0003431448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98702997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14658657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14658657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21248896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9898386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784948189","doi":"10.29173/alr1359","title":"Disclosure and Production in Sexual Violence Cases: Situating Stinchcombe","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Plaintiff; Law; Context (archaeology); Deference; Legislature; Supreme court; Sociology; Sexual violence; Political science; Criminology; History","score_opus":0.05268396725805665,"score_gpt":0.3262055393352087,"score_spread":0.27352157207715205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784948189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28133982,0.16150807,0.002789919,0.07368036,0.0007229061,0.00006253883,0.00004756433,0.00001931028,0.47982946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94127035,0.034417577,0.00041644098,0.007987303,0.0004219478,0.000024966355,0.000017335762,0.00000917092,0.0154349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933467,0.0033067134,0.00021751292,0.00033768866,0.001778613,0.0010127386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863129,0.0102968095,0.001821828,0.00033647413,0.0008845007,0.0003474656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069620814,0.00013337549,0.0002876823,0.0029099581,0.0065517733,0.0074677584,0.0009971276,0.003588745,0.0016294383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01616413,0.0002746628,0.00015145123,0.0036808639,0.018534768,0.0040222756,0.004059322,0.0027905777,0.00011174778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028113707,0.000030426067,0.006138892,0.00023320413,0.0000066814514,0.0029038696,0.11058455,0.00022246064,0.00023886329,0.8036886,0.00960756,0.06631677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001934909,0.00011340749,0.029270815,0.0026265671,0.000036003225,0.004885936,0.12673727,0.00038541172,0.0014429562,0.070342556,0.76405954,0.000080231424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06966631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13285324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06966631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009644072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008797489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13852167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2786400951","doi":"","title":"Beyond Beyond Conjugality","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Hindsight bias; Politics; Commission; Political science; Law; Relevance (law); State (computer science); Medicine; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.031094565741678827,"score_gpt":0.3047098728487075,"score_spread":0.27361530710702864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2786400951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04293985,0.010954596,0.01283896,0.19774628,0.005720125,0.00031103013,0.0007463641,0.00022116843,0.7285215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6564595,0.008429174,0.006114998,0.12014278,0.0017486896,0.00026481212,0.0007780055,0.00022503953,0.20583692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96546936,0.0064461976,0.0012241842,0.0032159097,0.015752617,0.007891703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775574,0.0055447053,0.0014560637,0.0031367373,0.009617171,0.0026877956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013633077,0.00074309047,0.00064755994,0.0021089532,0.016921956,0.01302578,0.004760565,0.008556446,0.008978371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0361588,0.0005557545,0.001039994,0.0019345512,0.022900065,0.009263005,0.011975313,0.014139665,0.0014249858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029532068,0.000029904757,0.0030860938,0.00012805863,0.000015814268,0.0003025901,0.013932964,0.0001796782,0.00023548734,0.8971904,0.055412862,0.02945662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001549108,0.00007208932,0.005797494,0.0005987916,0.00004447317,0.00024462296,0.0116313435,0.0002060313,0.00091651594,0.046568308,0.93382835,0.00007649543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6631427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64185864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6631427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032203723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.096120305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6776823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2786801026","doi":"10.7202/1042929ar","title":"Alice au pays des merveilles dans le monde juridique","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Alice (programming language); Humanities; Adventure; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Art; Art history; Theology","score_opus":0.025477249381486287,"score_gpt":0.27768676451510294,"score_spread":0.25220951513361667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2786801026","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32027736,0.015691493,0.0022627343,0.15139979,0.0011959445,0.000029073319,0.00010101605,0.00005395894,0.5089886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88856256,0.0025210546,0.00047031674,0.0062123,0.00016915747,0.00003308424,0.000014201142,0.00004810465,0.101969205],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946355,0.0032927294,0.000073871044,0.00034392858,0.0007392465,0.0009146688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659497,0.0021016311,0.0003702841,0.0001506302,0.00022531376,0.0005571264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030623816,0.00027911272,0.0004535524,0.00085305265,0.029850824,0.010030218,0.0009933894,0.0041046552,0.011670054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073343473,0.0005008479,0.00021099891,0.0017040994,0.020193795,0.0057426807,0.0069609997,0.006681948,0.0008454616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028391207,0.000013462416,0.0016500273,0.00005256674,0.000004035556,0.0007681437,0.4888236,0.000055920882,0.000202226,0.4887786,0.013725256,0.0058978475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006274239,0.000015457981,0.0036159614,0.00022602841,0.000004433092,0.00050396274,0.23176287,0.00006264706,0.00022715946,0.017467558,0.74607176,0.000035729034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078880124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17567214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078880124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009395958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007522597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.156842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787256313","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0048","title":"The Rule of Law, the Separation of Powers and Judicial Independence in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Separation of powers; Law; Constitutionalism; Political science; Constitutional law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Judicial independence; Constitution; Constitutional economics; Judicial review; Constitutional theory; Rule of law; Public law; Enumerated powers; Legislature; Federalism; Law and economics; Democracy; Sovereignty; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02760788342213357,"score_gpt":0.25797932639672777,"score_spread":0.2303714429745942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787256313","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009038871,0.022415275,0.001743759,0.019057885,0.00052281795,0.000041593634,0.00027427098,0.000044041033,0.9468615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64357215,0.040545467,0.0047727865,0.007744105,0.00040253685,0.00009173665,0.00041232095,0.00014061424,0.3023182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716884,0.0002458277,0.000051948722,0.00021998122,0.0016141352,0.00069927087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998718,0.00032879188,0.00006192338,0.000056614328,0.0005969612,0.00023778762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010625254,0.00032011356,0.00038822688,0.0018842922,0.012159037,0.009425496,0.0012427996,0.0016764754,0.008053794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002761072,0.0002666296,0.00023916455,0.004222698,0.013979496,0.0017268683,0.0015534349,0.0034670164,0.0006016484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004024946,0.0000051794814,0.00025177863,0.000045062065,0.0000023856435,0.00007385545,0.0041341204,0.00021931579,0.0000653748,0.9486007,0.031121338,0.015476893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070178294,0.0000052762903,0.0026491326,0.00036676042,0.000011511329,0.000072880015,0.0032585058,0.00039495493,0.00015994425,0.09232611,0.9007168,0.000031168394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9883449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.114612125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.114612125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19551358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83157307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787498572","doi":"","title":"Comment on Patrick Macklem’s “Indigenous Peoples and Ethos of Legal Pluralism in Canada”","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Padua  Archive (University of Padua)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Indigenous; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Environmental ethics; Legal pluralism; Sociology; Ethnology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Comparative law; Legal realism","score_opus":0.04272550115702171,"score_gpt":0.3101679604066816,"score_spread":0.26744245924965987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787498572","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030545245,0.001330686,0.00014157874,0.9815595,0.0052837757,0.000018816325,0.00013015844,0.000029349549,0.008451582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016597776,0.00061596785,0.00013397311,0.9556101,0.0029996778,0.00005237529,0.000028438173,0.00006112813,0.023900583],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99140304,0.0011316008,0.00039366967,0.001506208,0.0025200073,0.0030453904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9734751,0.012747312,0.0012518305,0.00068585784,0.0072659953,0.004574015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007462384,0.0011648517,0.0017883698,0.0017196857,0.048726697,0.013555434,0.007279099,0.077254996,0.012088819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03385304,0.0018565854,0.0014744771,0.003570455,0.024290435,0.009971493,0.007327404,0.08104073,0.003512992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033482935,0.0000136377885,0.00062642124,0.00006420033,0.000019808153,0.00047202618,0.01338499,0.00008047773,0.00016035631,0.021254199,0.96211934,0.0017709823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043950466,0.000016968526,0.0047551095,0.00048777927,0.000050156694,0.0003255472,0.047742944,0.00020914791,0.000569509,0.010855306,0.9347157,0.00022786128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8965143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93258834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1034857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035076335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062022876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25449783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788603151","doi":"","title":"The Canadian constitutions, 1763-1982","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02186289806599572,"score_gpt":0.2617317443754336,"score_spread":0.2398688463094379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788603151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004707661,0.057870332,0.00039924736,0.02646955,0.002622683,0.00016423798,0.019692915,0.00014792115,0.88792545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057153054,0.0310308,0.0010503551,0.0056070145,0.00046056331,0.00017451846,0.0032871687,0.0001337522,0.9011028],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696964,0.00014922855,0.00012180343,0.00023837016,0.0017163192,0.0008047403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996997,0.00028756048,0.00010210254,0.000138791,0.0022133163,0.00026121852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016081847,0.001056647,0.0006112051,0.006115175,0.016614262,0.008532206,0.0018027235,0.0034094816,0.03852964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008582767,0.0011201467,0.0005118345,0.016177306,0.005246705,0.0028022712,0.001510863,0.003879546,0.00435607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025747968,0.000021232647,0.0008752163,0.00015149974,0.000007825579,0.00009540965,0.0030645947,0.00025087304,0.00005154495,0.2110491,0.7491405,0.035266537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050578315,0.0000016602228,0.0042049834,0.00015013074,0.0000067905607,0.000013706287,0.0007591329,0.00002267446,0.00003719649,0.0029269205,0.99185634,0.000015439062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99887556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1819613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1819613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2840955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94880897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789164846","doi":"","title":"Supreme Court of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.020998383352644593,"score_gpt":0.26809355468644164,"score_spread":0.24709517133379705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789164846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012866647,0.007911783,0.00054494315,0.11702944,0.004069273,0.0002349441,0.0027888878,0.00014783863,0.8544063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1044669,0.003387511,0.0007847105,0.08137869,0.0009688099,0.0002528552,0.0006442491,0.00015640062,0.8079598],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98796767,0.00061090046,0.00028931722,0.0013921537,0.005082176,0.0046577617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99139345,0.0014259992,0.0001651765,0.00044135097,0.005345376,0.0012285364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038356653,0.0010957271,0.001545662,0.00374819,0.044031896,0.019006288,0.004528223,0.021876339,0.035906304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01522223,0.0014677424,0.0014701897,0.00385261,0.0060072504,0.003416742,0.0036614446,0.017634299,0.003927923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004128734,0.000047561432,0.0010743457,0.000056831635,0.000029391838,0.00025618897,0.0011501802,0.00020573605,0.00013870667,0.46361068,0.5247839,0.008605152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004322943,0.000014530785,0.0028116892,0.00025879245,0.00006985954,0.00006484364,0.0015024247,0.0004096025,0.00025991042,0.021931367,0.97253436,0.00009941171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9867619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99311286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115347914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.115347914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28666648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8369116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789252371","doi":"","title":"The consolidated orders in council of Canada : under the authority and direction of his excellency the governor-general in council","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Governor; Political science; Law; Public administration; Management; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.032410787523865406,"score_gpt":0.23281185460963913,"score_spread":0.2004010670857737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789252371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040249396,0.012344689,0.0011137739,0.40049383,0.009070644,0.00013511327,0.0012005293,0.0002734476,0.5351186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29070348,0.004633253,0.0012651784,0.040306184,0.00084241125,0.000048444283,0.0003071324,0.0002223832,0.6616714],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99323505,0.0003833966,0.00013914485,0.00056093425,0.002889869,0.0027916478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990155,0.00076840504,0.00023532899,0.00026252095,0.0048561194,0.0037226644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026805522,0.00046026226,0.0004871494,0.0011143942,0.03444944,0.015222531,0.0021438592,0.0069544343,0.015384081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012414696,0.0009057835,0.00032354784,0.0024639163,0.00947464,0.0035643205,0.0031658178,0.012173277,0.0014227282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025261545,0.000029188825,0.0029020887,0.000049660004,0.000008920496,0.00026402934,0.010486259,0.00021356724,0.00013864864,0.15954481,0.8050906,0.021246968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009648241,0.0000071231952,0.005259506,0.000084835105,0.0000090071735,0.00003605578,0.008671356,0.00011433201,0.00011272424,0.0021396892,0.9835127,0.00004288248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15313551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15313551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36877304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98224276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789423786","doi":"","title":"The consolidated statutes of New Brunswick.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.021870464732610055,"score_gpt":0.2671398320158382,"score_spread":0.24526936728322812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789423786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002605373,0.02226776,0.0011137443,0.02343299,0.0038381692,0.00024097176,0.028638028,0.00030078582,0.9175621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018117629,0.007555292,0.0019142133,0.0052680746,0.00015368013,0.00014642892,0.0065375282,0.0002122633,0.96009487],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967776,0.00016816937,0.00016750688,0.00032863164,0.0018080982,0.0007500783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684733,0.00033978547,0.00011740018,0.00023200875,0.0022595373,0.00020391397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016405461,0.0008654853,0.00053139566,0.004322508,0.005732752,0.0077142,0.0023667163,0.0026679428,0.061220963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064939493,0.0010870327,0.0005046396,0.01095766,0.0023744148,0.0031361803,0.001714808,0.0055059413,0.012585511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002170739,0.000018726954,0.0010469834,0.00011821846,0.000006663643,0.00008904852,0.0007310722,0.00014258099,0.0001517237,0.15281267,0.8059878,0.03887289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037017335,0.0000013914557,0.0027076523,0.00012948315,0.000004439471,0.00001915341,0.00036789314,0.00003788107,0.00010903106,0.0026669633,0.9939367,0.000015660926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9790269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99227047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07626301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07626301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13948785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55332947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789472579","doi":"","title":"The consolidated statutes of Canada : proclaimed and published under the authority of the act 22 Vict. cap. 29, A.D. 1859.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.01252560757571194,"score_gpt":0.23675870876172314,"score_spread":0.2242331011860112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789472579","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040376033,0.031272728,0.0031019473,0.04838047,0.0088416785,0.00049880985,0.039837096,0.0008106651,0.86321896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05092164,0.0113148885,0.0063200654,0.019346923,0.00072485866,0.0003246548,0.00737246,0.00042782485,0.90324664],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99132466,0.00027505637,0.00021275757,0.000388201,0.0061005102,0.0016988637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99259853,0.00032231174,0.0001720636,0.00022250765,0.0062215147,0.00046311284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022889355,0.00091893267,0.0006617375,0.003952442,0.011658515,0.0078054424,0.0025788932,0.004509604,0.027087916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0083452435,0.00094361923,0.0007876182,0.008120879,0.003822996,0.00189907,0.001704867,0.0060693244,0.006899998],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017014045,0.000013263233,0.00050130713,0.000086411295,0.000005904391,0.000051191873,0.00073270354,0.00010011046,0.00014086367,0.10126538,0.87881315,0.018272765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057975303,0.0000026957448,0.0021063944,0.00011136833,0.000007801333,0.000020920701,0.00027092913,0.00005030969,0.0001209353,0.0018657357,0.99541324,0.000023959661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99321556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99645704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092015825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.092015825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35230744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66762465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789505987","doi":"","title":"Reports of the Nova Scotia Advisory Committees on Constitutional Issues","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Advisory committee; Political science; Nova (rocket); Public administration; Geography; Engineering; Aeronautics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02572364698417478,"score_gpt":0.27521152455089803,"score_spread":0.24948787756672325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789505987","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027127808,0.00863571,0.0007430198,0.50751966,0.022274822,0.0012464351,0.007653917,0.0002132639,0.4245853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06345398,0.0057999417,0.001465656,0.13482329,0.0039364863,0.00047249996,0.0021463747,0.00015686374,0.787745],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840971,0.0013764446,0.0007949853,0.0008787914,0.009379109,0.0034735568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9346649,0.02231587,0.0030888414,0.0019310609,0.030095665,0.007903744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016911495,0.00074713636,0.00076891185,0.0041850866,0.016390005,0.012295214,0.002626289,0.014636741,0.028123595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040460635,0.0011728621,0.0010375812,0.004877276,0.0026814996,0.0017483858,0.0025970284,0.011319515,0.004168912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004975156,0.000029160345,0.0017403922,0.0001130912,0.000011460868,0.00016565534,0.00091377844,0.00008979004,0.00028820083,0.005240049,0.985692,0.00566655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003816676,0.000014698636,0.017094254,0.0004065755,0.000045198798,0.00003984978,0.0025771707,0.00017444104,0.00044555787,0.00083696574,0.9782729,0.000054271102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.839001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93678826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.160999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03271379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11781741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32389426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789586117","doi":"","title":"Epitome of the laws of Nova-Scotia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Epitome; Law; Nova (rocket); Political science; History; Art; Archaeology; Engineering; Aeronautics; Literature","score_opus":0.021527813676698284,"score_gpt":0.2587053619854907,"score_spread":0.23717754830879242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789586117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008681502,0.028973723,0.00034319214,0.03765621,0.008527393,0.00006192059,0.0065380386,0.00023413403,0.9089838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03585651,0.0063591707,0.00032420756,0.0047678137,0.0005367682,0.000025497531,0.000959063,0.00009564325,0.9510753],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943906,0.000027967246,0.000022247728,0.00005800682,0.0002820573,0.00017060814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991843,0.00014322755,0.000050767805,0.000044864257,0.0004360226,0.0001407492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002711306,0.00040314783,0.0003064934,0.001959042,0.0051559797,0.005212779,0.0006912632,0.0015552879,0.047622763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018190831,0.00031105443,0.00023759858,0.003657175,0.0020879295,0.0010578003,0.00077398395,0.0019262708,0.006259925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036653713,0.0000087793405,0.0007223174,0.00017382839,0.0000040871278,0.00029086633,0.0018426989,0.00008095335,0.00035827805,0.10283571,0.86586803,0.027777806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002448863,0.0000023973764,0.0035684512,0.00010605149,0.0000020353177,0.000054329234,0.0004941197,0.00002307581,0.00004612146,0.00075252674,0.99494296,0.0000055358396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9492772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9804016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050722778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01917115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030716492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15931404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789630241","doi":"","title":"The report of the Nova Scotia House of Assembly Select Committee on Constitutional Matters","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Political science; Archaeology; Law; History; Engineering; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.021562873062293982,"score_gpt":0.2630142764675198,"score_spread":0.2414514034052258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789630241","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030159928,0.013595569,0.0014317881,0.41850555,0.054062773,0.0037464797,0.036921255,0.0005598286,0.4410168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02827394,0.003659293,0.0017218748,0.10289216,0.003430056,0.0010120729,0.004188034,0.00022592663,0.8545967],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98793167,0.00081861985,0.00061782653,0.00073896424,0.0064470703,0.0034457806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794332,0.004717496,0.00091157475,0.0010612393,0.01032209,0.0035545335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011584639,0.0009474015,0.0013254333,0.0031445455,0.012414269,0.012216956,0.003484272,0.020184929,0.022903932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0256706,0.0014611509,0.0013788642,0.0033815533,0.002232659,0.0018960075,0.0022202758,0.0132131325,0.006995801],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045064953,0.00003862591,0.00110943,0.00010275489,0.000013857484,0.00012186153,0.0004440546,0.00009978407,0.00028458983,0.005502607,0.98797137,0.004266029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004745438,0.000017801913,0.019396193,0.00038410074,0.000048893322,0.000025183179,0.001390201,0.00015307685,0.00039013903,0.00099243,0.9770897,0.00006485249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86109114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.946167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13890886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026609074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12585697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2794538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789665508","doi":"","title":"British Columbia statute citator : R.S.B.C. 1996 edition.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01430607723346247,"score_gpt":0.23703300050151732,"score_spread":0.22272692326805485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789665508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010653735,0.015302174,0.00035561947,0.023985483,0.003196035,0.00016583025,0.055988017,0.00072153495,0.89921993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031863865,0.003535387,0.00022814944,0.0019343543,0.00013404964,0.00007143234,0.0058324877,0.00014667746,0.9849311],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982622,0.000058423124,0.000071687406,0.00016413133,0.0010842725,0.00035941132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99577075,0.00022467422,0.00009064623,0.00019671276,0.003526092,0.00019104095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080900354,0.0012894823,0.0010451409,0.003976234,0.006802176,0.0051834467,0.002412369,0.0031763236,0.23201998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035948919,0.001073197,0.0006003195,0.0102547705,0.0013574789,0.0020615845,0.00092282007,0.0038767569,0.1175506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007733262,0.0000039295724,0.00011307556,0.000048510996,0.0000013267297,0.000017984348,0.000046645448,0.000024900928,0.000039430513,0.003359855,0.9893527,0.0069837654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004876662,0.0000019797465,0.0020340462,0.0001242107,0.000004197423,0.000014841091,0.00010489836,0.000033319295,0.00009947161,0.0004994814,0.99706984,0.000008764817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9654508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9819724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23201998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039989937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06602478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77618414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789688059","doi":"","title":"Upper Canada statutes.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law; Geology","score_opus":0.014543314188543335,"score_gpt":0.23930284731491888,"score_spread":0.22475953312637553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789688059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008898415,0.0035497693,0.00023236888,0.0084262965,0.00070936093,0.00009684739,0.025362005,0.00030827004,0.9604252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0062824995,0.0016975162,0.00033052298,0.004422144,0.000098767676,0.000059809317,0.0048598303,0.00015487769,0.982094],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955397,0.00011274616,0.000092097114,0.0002731247,0.0028597615,0.0011225088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951652,0.00028423654,0.000077226185,0.00019309577,0.0038683678,0.0004118345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001051393,0.0010302028,0.00077889796,0.0034554144,0.013411928,0.0075427275,0.0027402928,0.0040115584,0.21412821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050176107,0.0011501263,0.0007261207,0.0074929507,0.0016661913,0.0023638254,0.0017320294,0.0042695254,0.07213901],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008398375,0.000013240602,0.00031947854,0.000028691245,0.0000022199447,0.00002728724,0.00013102422,0.000043757937,0.000041743286,0.018854197,0.97020346,0.01032653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050582084,0.0000022205072,0.0020191679,0.00006480788,0.0000044662247,0.000013125475,0.00021307035,0.000048069218,0.00007379979,0.0011843926,0.99635774,0.000013973275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99048585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21412821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07061437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1342968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71633023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789701351","doi":"","title":"Law Foundation of British Columbia.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.019037387177350845,"score_gpt":0.26247670750441543,"score_spread":0.24343932032706458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789701351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022487866,0.00789649,0.000413977,0.021450067,0.001608912,0.000098200995,0.038954753,0.00079868635,0.9265301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008633589,0.0026439487,0.0003532524,0.0015926039,0.00005668437,0.000041545827,0.0045139673,0.00016671557,0.9819978],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854565,0.00007100832,0.00006922074,0.00018404916,0.00078173645,0.0003482907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99352264,0.00048407397,0.00013451283,0.0002834023,0.0047943606,0.0007810174],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086557475,0.00056821347,0.000723419,0.0031818424,0.006049586,0.0048394836,0.0015221606,0.0028509777,0.3294274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056979535,0.00070087676,0.00029374534,0.0044450634,0.0007788468,0.001340314,0.0011209997,0.0031983075,0.072574094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001746119,0.000013904305,0.00062957965,0.000099033605,0.0000038519834,0.0000812982,0.00009870124,0.00003566284,0.000062222134,0.008329435,0.94570035,0.044928424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005138606,0.0000030896524,0.004068461,0.00018687239,0.00000652505,0.000042734595,0.000306382,0.000075736134,0.00009129434,0.0006750294,0.99452704,0.0000116497895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.934786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9705194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3294274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021889795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04870607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95649046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789702768","doi":"","title":"Report of the Committee to Study and Review the Judicial System of Saskatchewan.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.019640690873801075,"score_gpt":0.2692741739221532,"score_spread":0.24963348304835212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789702768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0689151,0.05282228,0.005713317,0.34270722,0.017603748,0.0122094015,0.1108133,0.00085742795,0.38835832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08633754,0.026947169,0.012850661,0.060660087,0.0014955896,0.006610069,0.022269275,0.00031676097,0.78251284],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.983932,0.0029617408,0.001501172,0.00089365593,0.008145848,0.0025656556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8932438,0.014042374,0.0035125085,0.0045423885,0.07749481,0.0071640653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02765072,0.0008578782,0.0006854911,0.007726901,0.00590834,0.0064296983,0.0035715797,0.0063798362,0.0141259665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035578698,0.0012422575,0.00093248,0.0084721185,0.0026914186,0.0023942182,0.002692568,0.004465835,0.0051604235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009657152,0.000086539076,0.01268402,0.00049697177,0.0000690359,0.00026405152,0.0012092704,0.00039292002,0.0008896089,0.008571092,0.953071,0.022168888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006261634,0.000031745672,0.08759066,0.0010507681,0.0001514188,0.00007378683,0.0050280476,0.00038824292,0.0012735982,0.0020506599,0.902195,0.000103408835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86805874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94636536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9601586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03984144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30530828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28907126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789745359","doi":"","title":"The Charter and law reform: the role of the Constitution in the future endeavours of the Law Reform Commission of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Law reform; Political science; Charter; Law; Constitution; Public law","score_opus":0.0073450408116859925,"score_gpt":0.21401998107643552,"score_spread":0.20667494026474953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789745359","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028479105,0.032508064,0.0012473501,0.5837247,0.002144654,0.000071973474,0.00041065784,0.000077538,0.351336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72479314,0.017369624,0.0020206426,0.044891823,0.0008491782,0.000072030576,0.00016286876,0.00012111357,0.2097195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931117,0.0010615524,0.00008947167,0.0004087021,0.0023878154,0.0029407614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948487,0.0013942096,0.0002443527,0.00015440775,0.0018133536,0.0015450069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042468794,0.00042331498,0.00058093795,0.0018865715,0.028755926,0.022151224,0.0020775422,0.008264224,0.008975498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013482678,0.0005597467,0.00035993973,0.0040760045,0.02732324,0.006177227,0.0028950088,0.009428671,0.00044591646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016970433,0.000017825105,0.000977979,0.00004788413,0.00000509941,0.000098392884,0.0075036017,0.00039945956,0.00007656403,0.8729091,0.10572918,0.0122178625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041194176,0.000015930797,0.009265518,0.000473316,0.000026601578,0.000048884507,0.024646735,0.0014769144,0.00025848436,0.13107184,0.83254707,0.00012746795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99601966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99792826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7742331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22576687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.47884402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8980007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789836056","doi":"","title":"Reports of the Supreme Court of Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01479750750637638,"score_gpt":0.23279857186722291,"score_spread":0.21800106436084654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789836056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022611046,0.05818187,0.00037921048,0.20203105,0.007273336,0.00025421748,0.028274713,0.00021923256,0.68077534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16815975,0.025079703,0.0005784879,0.041604064,0.0014380496,0.0001464588,0.005685671,0.0001982835,0.7571095],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943656,0.00018662142,0.000114984745,0.00029195184,0.0033274177,0.001713392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994313,0.00065508595,0.00018726707,0.00012436607,0.003986116,0.00073421234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016969063,0.00080433034,0.0005243431,0.004074431,0.019528933,0.0085136695,0.002510157,0.0067939498,0.024657274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008644746,0.00073727395,0.0006028144,0.0063071046,0.002589283,0.0018632156,0.0016764746,0.006410335,0.0023645272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020992673,0.000016871047,0.0014054895,0.00006694478,0.000009677588,0.00017605872,0.0006822763,0.00008286286,0.000054790686,0.025831247,0.9645568,0.0070959893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015647147,0.000007841647,0.015999043,0.0002775185,0.00004431682,0.00007284442,0.0031141317,0.00016906094,0.00039064113,0.0029429917,0.9769151,0.000050850304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9930354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07739319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07739319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17897852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5615295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789902355","doi":"","title":"Revised statutes of Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.016164093329110094,"score_gpt":0.2425944280175748,"score_spread":0.2264303346884647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789902355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023917132,0.022400988,0.0014598459,0.034779467,0.00589132,0.00040254646,0.07040448,0.00072339666,0.8615463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019606039,0.008709782,0.0030724187,0.011187263,0.0004368737,0.00026516043,0.013212564,0.00028020123,0.94322985],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937435,0.00025771488,0.00023445566,0.00039677753,0.0041657225,0.0012018556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98886955,0.0006020188,0.00016505197,0.000291955,0.009603138,0.00046830665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021156177,0.0011113363,0.0008205946,0.005306199,0.010221069,0.0070605753,0.0029509668,0.0044468236,0.065217376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00911517,0.001282907,0.00091269804,0.0109701315,0.0023391196,0.0023730465,0.0011706689,0.0051591434,0.015461738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011195406,0.000014248322,0.0003987964,0.000049574555,0.0000036333408,0.00003064508,0.00018053054,0.000094299816,0.000040129013,0.034610517,0.9533901,0.011176296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081648595,0.0000036218842,0.0031815036,0.00012457152,0.000010292815,0.000025145871,0.00025374952,0.00008091789,0.000087306646,0.0018634237,0.99433666,0.00002466736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9931282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99598986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91260535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08739465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20343368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63409555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790096435","doi":"","title":"Canada. Parliament. Special Joint Committee on the 1987 Constitutional Accord","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Joint (building); Law; Constitutional court; Constitution; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.03508333222081692,"score_gpt":0.25680805494824244,"score_spread":0.22172472272742552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790096435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036300567,0.008771252,0.0010295444,0.0947139,0.015558814,0.0009495147,0.0175444,0.001046085,0.85675645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011844155,0.002157311,0.0010056241,0.042179715,0.0011380472,0.00044281106,0.0020022115,0.0003901635,0.9388399],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883284,0.00064642716,0.00047561247,0.000757886,0.006621355,0.0031703159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899588,0.0019645083,0.00026786397,0.0006297672,0.0059828735,0.0011961051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007410509,0.001398109,0.0021289242,0.004680283,0.016803253,0.01421657,0.0054755886,0.02892407,0.114966564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01661498,0.00236624,0.0018055805,0.0084545,0.0038581444,0.0033164774,0.0027958134,0.018187441,0.033136334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030301328,0.000037775328,0.00018289992,0.000074582254,0.000007876437,0.00005639103,0.00020263274,0.00009550412,0.00011647432,0.032884084,0.9578909,0.0084205195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034803237,0.0000059992685,0.0027234072,0.00016644805,0.000020636347,0.000012661113,0.00025999153,0.00010448308,0.0001576623,0.002365457,0.9941089,0.000039532806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9507028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9664464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.114966564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06294092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15280707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45667046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790143147","doi":"","title":"Abortion and our Canadian laws: laws concerning abortion","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Law; Political science; Pregnancy; Biology","score_opus":0.03333094323165154,"score_gpt":0.29898844774850714,"score_spread":0.2656575045168556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790143147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046798014,0.16558345,0.0003263095,0.25739253,0.006402526,0.00008520844,0.0023096907,0.000105860425,0.5631146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10607375,0.19042677,0.001353807,0.08530516,0.0032042272,0.00014593574,0.0013834825,0.00014836557,0.6119585],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778205,0.00015965446,0.0000536806,0.00012471167,0.0010625542,0.0008174772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976659,0.00046488774,0.00011815843,0.00005275077,0.0010651996,0.00063316413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013041681,0.0007301672,0.00043776882,0.0034010527,0.015443508,0.0074239583,0.0021366512,0.007020217,0.032185357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049218778,0.000679849,0.00060676987,0.007973162,0.0078648105,0.0027961098,0.0016064513,0.0058250716,0.0022156157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072655384,0.000021818818,0.0005815006,0.00015411443,0.00000482809,0.000057920646,0.0045677777,0.000080110665,0.0000479328,0.12431651,0.8471338,0.023026407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042398087,0.000002489583,0.0039693667,0.00032203528,0.000010146329,0.000028302495,0.0032791668,0.000031464268,0.00002303585,0.0036853494,0.9886234,0.000020898067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99743587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13510396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13510396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3699362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9802524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790261709","doi":"","title":"The patriation and legitimacy of the Canadian Constitution","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Constitution; Political science; Democratic legitimacy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.017221086216382943,"score_gpt":0.2478710325694878,"score_spread":0.23064994635310487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790261709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012057903,0.0057040965,0.0013164498,0.053551253,0.0004358838,0.000028167302,0.00025683397,0.000030029149,0.92661947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87829906,0.004539548,0.0014881134,0.0063799354,0.00041455607,0.000046181423,0.0001138024,0.000077100514,0.108641736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99163306,0.0012686765,0.00016662788,0.0007245652,0.0037682585,0.0024388118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99116385,0.00309788,0.00030844944,0.00057531963,0.0042737965,0.00058070046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005332109,0.00043306433,0.0006202195,0.003932384,0.024866559,0.019494291,0.002136702,0.0055503356,0.011514844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021406818,0.000704775,0.0003784663,0.005540304,0.053874794,0.0051580444,0.0024867603,0.0072675236,0.0006905036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003403648,0.000002013086,0.00011070121,0.000009181536,0.0000016571737,0.000020282781,0.0024466682,0.000058655925,0.000015856966,0.9849916,0.0096468525,0.0026932033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024047084,0.0000070575625,0.004705793,0.0004204011,0.000033701745,0.00006066221,0.008312016,0.0005349892,0.00018771758,0.47641915,0.5092254,0.00006903209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9827185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98813605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.119487286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.119487286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18424357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.866945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790315201","doi":"","title":"Index to Canadian legal literature, 1985-2000","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Political science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.012939407106818915,"score_gpt":0.2500529014348576,"score_spread":0.2371134943280387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790315201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014824615,0.19345608,0.00029029962,0.012838177,0.007359823,0.00019942678,0.110380575,0.00049575756,0.6734974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014092199,0.15281336,0.0010397596,0.003079907,0.0013410224,0.00017270462,0.036676787,0.00017675465,0.7906075],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986224,0.00003531977,0.000072945324,0.00010760611,0.00092592975,0.00023577173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99566996,0.00028127054,0.00015045165,0.00006179366,0.003422798,0.00041371034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000613967,0.0014571894,0.0009060118,0.042647883,0.0075646015,0.005955923,0.002115031,0.0013161747,0.18500052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005310933,0.0005413396,0.0005298874,0.08905999,0.0019904994,0.0032245282,0.0013545642,0.0013062472,0.03275299],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005141261,0.0000054831153,0.00021222516,0.0003084476,0.0000016459497,0.000019692048,0.00014518837,0.000040096336,0.0000123016935,0.0025572535,0.97621775,0.020474628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019320391,8.7388815e-7,0.0019634855,0.00047697345,0.000004421773,0.000018130875,0.00026377614,0.000014118751,0.00001002964,0.00031831133,0.9969227,0.000005099243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98208493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9912844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18500052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.081653684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12205298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6188884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790335405","doi":"","title":"Newfoundland. Office of the Legislative Counsel.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Business; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02350382428055551,"score_gpt":0.27358808298098525,"score_spread":0.2500842587004297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790335405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005992583,0.0031089082,0.00020784624,0.01607335,0.0015606988,0.000090310685,0.02713599,0.0005019665,0.95072156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017320422,0.0010572505,0.00021162916,0.002012202,0.000083709696,0.000034273493,0.0025230343,0.00012674683,0.9922191],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786204,0.00015950577,0.00012687268,0.00024272209,0.0009999548,0.00060886744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943539,0.00072913326,0.00026478595,0.00037749996,0.0034295064,0.00084522157],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001722564,0.000702069,0.00069646887,0.0020384027,0.0050346088,0.0036980442,0.0018204594,0.003398427,0.5239625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050395024,0.0010560715,0.00037789939,0.0044578584,0.0009700204,0.0024108158,0.0015079237,0.003117537,0.243207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009097733,0.000010694628,0.0002209065,0.000035173314,0.0000014902887,0.00002604515,0.000041750667,0.000013350335,0.000026981565,0.003473326,0.9809234,0.015217778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030824506,0.0000015204096,0.0018358374,0.000064531494,0.0000024743679,0.0000106617545,0.00013923737,0.000014690199,0.000039540795,0.00016218406,0.9977208,0.0000054509574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8398056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91823447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5239625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013275743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029639034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6790097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790342254","doi":"","title":"The provincial statutes of Upper-Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Business; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.011849446026341125,"score_gpt":0.23552169350867436,"score_spread":0.22367224748233322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790342254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044810763,0.0172365,0.00072246726,0.01959875,0.0015163491,0.0000893259,0.018422235,0.0002519984,0.9376814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06916657,0.007224198,0.0014623004,0.0051886872,0.00017592199,0.000060842205,0.00427654,0.00015456248,0.91229033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798834,0.00006716951,0.000045535104,0.000118572585,0.0011612775,0.00061910116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99734855,0.00015643174,0.000058298556,0.000085404914,0.0020324062,0.00031894183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071030506,0.0005302504,0.00038717908,0.0023821113,0.010009223,0.005734576,0.0013546481,0.0016183432,0.050511315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003680421,0.00052797364,0.0003740357,0.005772781,0.0020237726,0.0015591073,0.001013182,0.0025682405,0.006402559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016315653,0.000012743534,0.0014433737,0.00006877812,0.0000041051767,0.000052645228,0.0008339323,0.00013817703,0.00008179383,0.15366824,0.8160801,0.027599765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037867114,0.0000022344793,0.006069652,0.00010699965,0.0000063854613,0.000023949557,0.00071849703,0.0001081858,0.000104980936,0.0031453236,0.9896947,0.000015289233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08513421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08513421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19185577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6176948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790345792","doi":"","title":"Submission to the Special Joint Committee of the Senate and of the House of Commons on the Constitution of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Constitution; House of Representatives; Political science; Joint (building); Law; Engineering; Parliament; Legislature; Politics","score_opus":0.02142208873928013,"score_gpt":0.2222007225151136,"score_spread":0.2007786337758335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790345792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009008741,0.009196949,0.001543401,0.20956561,0.07928472,0.0018500739,0.008509837,0.00080402225,0.6802367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014578223,0.0017717424,0.0009327779,0.032377806,0.004531237,0.00029050405,0.0013085523,0.00027054257,0.9439386],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99348444,0.0002788015,0.00024428303,0.00039135062,0.0036273648,0.001973703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895403,0.0010843452,0.00020780307,0.00048792743,0.006684991,0.0019945528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037553762,0.00096149545,0.0016989998,0.0026193422,0.018054042,0.011052729,0.0031527309,0.014114171,0.05865725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012559554,0.0010580573,0.0010966653,0.0026861874,0.0042470605,0.002230006,0.002471814,0.01035538,0.013358007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012168275,0.00001183272,0.00014725715,0.00002702035,0.000003796868,0.000059837603,0.00021465731,0.00004363083,0.0001683692,0.008057004,0.9883259,0.0029284714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000853549,0.0000059304375,0.0015353183,0.000064534936,0.000008335133,0.0000154958,0.0006051054,0.000065891865,0.00017550682,0.0009509758,0.9965321,0.00003231805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.909761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9655036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09023899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042103015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17221534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30548018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790711833","doi":"","title":"The consolidated statutes for Lower Canada : proclaimed and published under the authority of the act 23 Vict. cap. 56, A.D. 1860.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01477875066319915,"score_gpt":0.24746884878782688,"score_spread":0.23269009812462774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790711833","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00548041,0.019463541,0.0026052066,0.053145602,0.006398282,0.00039515796,0.033811264,0.00073616137,0.87796444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03390299,0.004462237,0.0033024794,0.014191033,0.00040229133,0.00018497063,0.004789488,0.00028210517,0.9384824],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99264115,0.00018459061,0.00015801932,0.00031881809,0.005172067,0.0015253407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940069,0.00023351997,0.00013107769,0.0001900232,0.0049952897,0.00044329817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018601242,0.00083313306,0.0005879598,0.0033993397,0.012717815,0.007226456,0.0026375693,0.0042438414,0.033900432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007477271,0.0009180686,0.00070089346,0.006092354,0.0031231777,0.0017517554,0.001771947,0.006131928,0.007683847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019677482,0.00001559806,0.0006617616,0.00007254038,0.0000052882942,0.000049247712,0.0008271792,0.0001090931,0.00019420368,0.09597245,0.88204694,0.02002599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006493507,0.0000034599784,0.0026007763,0.00008528902,0.0000075557305,0.000019468607,0.00032993755,0.000062671446,0.00015522474,0.0017500055,0.99495465,0.000024407324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9935283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09064072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09064072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30293888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65764755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790851994","doi":"","title":"A history of Canadian legal thought : collected essays","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.021781795884101493,"score_gpt":0.23519570579334637,"score_spread":0.21341390990924486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790851994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008739604,0.17941387,0.00076727604,0.16594592,0.007187271,0.000086772045,0.0030391056,0.00010457088,0.6347157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2633082,0.17450695,0.0025750776,0.038050193,0.0047097355,0.0001883137,0.0014842767,0.00038936798,0.514788],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959764,0.00034031944,0.000098620316,0.00033034818,0.002252491,0.0010017065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99302566,0.0014873949,0.0002020595,0.00018987653,0.0043412824,0.00075375166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027914483,0.0009891434,0.00076264987,0.012903644,0.032377645,0.015918242,0.0022333593,0.004197677,0.024669522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011366907,0.0006211373,0.00046194257,0.028410664,0.019680066,0.0048513035,0.0023747424,0.0044850153,0.0015555684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001804247,0.0000150464375,0.00045777104,0.0002545162,0.000007759866,0.000100153346,0.018240351,0.00009415717,0.00008826523,0.26576492,0.69019836,0.024760632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024077576,0.0000012166389,0.0015885506,0.00031686647,0.0000064787887,0.000029268083,0.005222808,0.000025275076,0.000049954862,0.0047599534,0.9879809,0.000016297181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9912315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76407194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23592809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25518343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8862151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790877104","doi":"","title":"Ontario. Legislative Assembly. Select Committee on Constitutional Reform","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Law; General assembly; Public administration; Legislative assembly; Politics","score_opus":0.031193738358511316,"score_gpt":0.28358908336297406,"score_spread":0.25239534500446276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790877104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009962699,0.005154863,0.00043122855,0.03836222,0.0052355486,0.0011394671,0.052698188,0.0008886763,0.8950936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030190465,0.0017745893,0.00054336153,0.009457411,0.00055756146,0.0005362755,0.0066450676,0.00023616124,0.9772305],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911588,0.0004156314,0.00037738233,0.0006956912,0.0054929783,0.0018596085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98896897,0.0011569618,0.00029461586,0.0006225922,0.007721447,0.0012353336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004756967,0.0013560214,0.0018321474,0.00606531,0.013223377,0.0072445106,0.0038023153,0.008877004,0.27823278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009190358,0.0020407913,0.0013503934,0.010473102,0.0027367715,0.002500996,0.0019325562,0.0060924203,0.11523039],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001653366,0.000010862621,0.0001187984,0.00008629162,0.000003504653,0.00002111491,0.00007418194,0.000020808478,0.00007007909,0.0038811737,0.9903278,0.0053690067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016559903,0.0000025276074,0.0018816998,0.0001056876,0.000008316985,0.000003455156,0.00010259109,0.00001982048,0.00006040995,0.00031178287,0.99747664,0.0000105304125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95291525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9804866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94240266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057597343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12260784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93078136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790881574","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Constitution 1981, highlights: highlights of the resolution adopted by the Parliament of Canada, December, 1981","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Constitution; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.013126271347663341,"score_gpt":0.22348123370049017,"score_spread":0.21035496235282683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790881574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009707305,0.068610504,0.000565351,0.31650373,0.022166982,0.00048340062,0.011020126,0.00024819153,0.57069445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036571845,0.013960373,0.00071873044,0.06535292,0.0020169292,0.00022599775,0.0011280335,0.00017725982,0.8798479],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922781,0.00037485905,0.00024262669,0.00045422558,0.0041478025,0.0025024293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99678254,0.0006499484,0.00013419878,0.00009796661,0.0018759411,0.0004594288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035599656,0.0010795415,0.0009760676,0.0029691502,0.032684974,0.014742024,0.003359882,0.015208447,0.016481806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013116913,0.0015513536,0.0008182512,0.007861455,0.006531231,0.0026680937,0.002346558,0.012142267,0.002633819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021719341,0.000017582684,0.00030703068,0.00009873981,0.000005882894,0.00011035536,0.001395787,0.00013671859,0.00009161947,0.051095653,0.94154876,0.005170176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013759055,0.000004272307,0.0051884996,0.00018124329,0.000011359434,0.000021451748,0.0017595869,0.000041842282,0.00012122475,0.0016073168,0.9909961,0.000053183943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9961222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7872216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2127784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3304842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9130655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791057598","doi":"","title":"[The Canadian constitution: documents]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01891804603770693,"score_gpt":0.26577024079102657,"score_spread":0.24685219475331965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791057598","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014892931,0.011847444,0.00056511397,0.03439235,0.0029893275,0.00018513697,0.015935281,0.00039108147,0.9322049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019291697,0.010102129,0.0016166687,0.013228715,0.00047184565,0.0001943518,0.0038948215,0.00030544848,0.9508943],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964238,0.00017363869,0.000120059085,0.00023770337,0.0021334728,0.00091130275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962889,0.00031017154,0.00008076398,0.00018339763,0.0028540746,0.00028271432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018482562,0.0009912947,0.00072397594,0.004772436,0.0153063545,0.0127817495,0.003306751,0.0059188944,0.082706966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072671524,0.0011261399,0.0007769272,0.012487676,0.0040110894,0.0030495175,0.0014085097,0.005499011,0.012861864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043250034,0.000009066931,0.00012265552,0.000053010637,0.000002236851,0.000019145553,0.0003400213,0.00005291275,0.000034876935,0.08730934,0.9033347,0.008717676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025251377,0.0000010114502,0.0008095497,0.00006989235,0.000003699128,0.000008776607,0.00024304818,0.00002305726,0.000033890974,0.0014407814,0.9973471,0.000016751494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99735093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10346334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10346334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28378072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7506826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791250404","doi":"","title":"Women's legal strategies in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.014359753263392805,"score_gpt":0.23439096413012483,"score_spread":0.22003121086673202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791250404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09899917,0.049066562,0.0006560583,0.22900982,0.0023670213,0.00018269531,0.0019797592,0.00019672688,0.6175422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48596486,0.02512844,0.0010816085,0.022368979,0.0002857571,0.00012696972,0.0005079879,0.00014476053,0.46439055],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948338,0.00034209626,0.000103830804,0.000240969,0.0016092553,0.0028698766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99355763,0.00080132985,0.00020632685,0.00007658632,0.0022497491,0.0031083764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021356023,0.00052633206,0.00074542745,0.0038737494,0.05196748,0.014887624,0.0033782627,0.004417694,0.026165904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066045537,0.0007540621,0.0005522554,0.009467674,0.008264005,0.002562973,0.0037247564,0.005661814,0.0011095242],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005089395,0.00011676982,0.007955829,0.00030143818,0.000028522276,0.0006431767,0.039466403,0.0005855532,0.0002271063,0.41165248,0.44645277,0.09251899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020890348,0.000020326981,0.018522557,0.00047616658,0.000029882061,0.000115217095,0.04881029,0.00031716036,0.00016984144,0.007292533,0.924146,0.000079121346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9988783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99954635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27380005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27380005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5535297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84228903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791259605","doi":"","title":"Canadian constitutional charter. Charte constitutionnelle canadienne","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Charter; Law","score_opus":0.01856120590253359,"score_gpt":0.23718095217910687,"score_spread":0.21861974627657327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791259605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014345817,0.032802388,0.0007076379,0.02260463,0.0036130943,0.0001525573,0.01673159,0.00055974093,0.9213937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025831047,0.019276658,0.0018765592,0.006826094,0.0006742174,0.0002144167,0.006337442,0.00035851408,0.93860507],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959877,0.0001749043,0.0001196711,0.00033935034,0.0025992296,0.0007791088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713576,0.00033715196,0.00010484329,0.00016422514,0.0019782658,0.00027966851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015177325,0.0012805297,0.0009831777,0.009341899,0.013909814,0.012093793,0.0026621418,0.0042793583,0.11087223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054964195,0.0012597896,0.0007279179,0.019747408,0.0043384377,0.0027161501,0.0013536427,0.0052005267,0.015032847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072134753,0.000010197458,0.00016676018,0.000077957266,0.0000034734696,0.000025798177,0.00030338994,0.00011025497,0.000036888094,0.13010846,0.8537805,0.015369207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004090272,0.0000011653806,0.0011442007,0.00008003489,0.000003026471,0.000012259558,0.00012622864,0.000033877375,0.000027971457,0.0031463392,0.9954058,0.000014853588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9919773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.123348705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.123348705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19928458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8949617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791308796","doi":"","title":"Canadian constitutional decisions of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, 1930 to 1939","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.038739408860526924,"score_gpt":0.25843523548732006,"score_spread":0.21969582662679313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791308796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04324485,0.024700645,0.0011781596,0.09986342,0.0037983106,0.00038477615,0.015080646,0.00023796789,0.8115112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27925825,0.009528726,0.002224034,0.04144548,0.00095635897,0.0002975009,0.0013646102,0.00024649137,0.66467845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896249,0.0005548542,0.00029652906,0.0011172611,0.0041844547,0.0042218557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930253,0.0012542668,0.00023947464,0.00029148048,0.0042705247,0.0009190303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005909396,0.00070493214,0.00081306556,0.004105125,0.032666735,0.012069411,0.0032719811,0.009729605,0.01658602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020991614,0.0019405946,0.00088073086,0.008507408,0.008408325,0.0025469663,0.0023070923,0.011493312,0.0014852908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008999511,0.000042291835,0.0018847071,0.00012222468,0.00003436292,0.00022224797,0.007066954,0.0004724098,0.00027654038,0.51085657,0.46468127,0.014250544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003835313,0.000010882888,0.015572094,0.00024853458,0.000048063317,0.00003160576,0.0022269415,0.0001568041,0.0004189284,0.009130459,0.9720048,0.00011264412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99857104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24796261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24796261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3134529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87225676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791377649","doi":"","title":"Cases decided on the British North America Act, 1867: in the Privy Council, the Supreme Court of Canada, and the provincial courts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science","score_opus":0.02204061331326527,"score_gpt":0.22164496649740528,"score_spread":0.19960435318414002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791377649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058341846,0.010052139,0.00079380453,0.07216321,0.0042488,0.0001981548,0.003159707,0.000121683144,0.8509206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21450537,0.0029580127,0.0010007048,0.06827041,0.0005905594,0.00020283181,0.00062778126,0.00013078756,0.7117135],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931351,0.00071252004,0.00026800172,0.00054566166,0.0028033769,0.0025353008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99530965,0.001808345,0.00018377982,0.00016092758,0.0019938487,0.000543483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029788709,0.00054755155,0.0006090675,0.001946106,0.026454598,0.008127303,0.0023640268,0.016729763,0.011763228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012824606,0.0012336457,0.0007402745,0.0035810221,0.0082356185,0.0027121569,0.0028023727,0.014277223,0.0021026395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054089498,0.000043094922,0.002868754,0.00009724177,0.000022915146,0.0006977311,0.012248074,0.00018311142,0.00036085278,0.3683968,0.60680586,0.008221536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029124036,0.000012469882,0.012134305,0.00029085414,0.00003857697,0.00012807062,0.005425415,0.00014090739,0.0005655669,0.009127508,0.97202706,0.00008025048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96843016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051532887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051532887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07739254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37389904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791587689","doi":"","title":"Law and custom in the Canadian constitution","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.021477033031984918,"score_gpt":0.2572768788994729,"score_spread":0.235799845867488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791587689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064241257,0.03501249,0.0009365896,0.04209988,0.0011535097,0.000041067884,0.0005341059,0.00006539526,0.91373277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49345472,0.033490058,0.0027820081,0.01372972,0.0012697486,0.00008303332,0.00042628587,0.00017229978,0.4545922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791235,0.0002656588,0.00004852742,0.00019149527,0.0008251688,0.0007568882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849033,0.00042923418,0.00006147156,0.0000881847,0.000667027,0.00026378533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014386032,0.0006288751,0.0005126125,0.003431252,0.01674175,0.0114035625,0.0016159357,0.0034665437,0.016827581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048576114,0.0005807984,0.0003344265,0.007208246,0.023772264,0.0034176025,0.0014214355,0.0043005557,0.0009362034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055817204,0.0000053568933,0.0002478913,0.000030417481,0.0000019403526,0.000038860904,0.0030454025,0.00019107407,0.00002979671,0.92920613,0.057441533,0.009756009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008954299,0.0000048552834,0.003749462,0.00031788132,0.000014950621,0.000042056283,0.0046860343,0.0002499684,0.00007347761,0.12086978,0.86994445,0.000038182665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99491537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13954216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13954216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22670893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99800915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791661567","doi":"10.11575/prism/29247","title":"Anglican Church of Canada. Diocese of Calgary","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Geography","score_opus":0.010371151974294585,"score_gpt":0.21289130488000316,"score_spread":0.20252015290570857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791661567","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26017404,0.077121876,0.00037929392,0.038568012,0.0027937288,0.00019213516,0.0068908203,0.00016892407,0.6137111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.549241,0.012305751,0.0005495597,0.0022457913,0.00019397504,0.000038286005,0.00083269284,0.00005748003,0.4345355],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997625,0.000038273796,0.000005826256,0.000026373267,0.000037338905,0.00012970486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994861,0.000049284583,0.000048272737,0.000016079846,0.00017099017,0.00022933837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026887143,0.00031498075,0.00018895035,0.0012771818,0.012974721,0.0016620054,0.00067307247,0.0006968304,0.041924756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060034666,0.00030308953,0.00009113568,0.0023679086,0.0014441293,0.00056437554,0.0010987258,0.0014538198,0.0021568995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002503127,0.00012531699,0.051165726,0.0007796616,0.000037821766,0.0028273056,0.08083615,0.0001745365,0.0012541604,0.11329973,0.5057156,0.24353363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014782905,0.000017188782,0.12690112,0.00031125665,0.000009241347,0.00029512006,0.032287374,0.0000408543,0.00022284716,0.000980707,0.83889973,0.000019737261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.945423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99308515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054576993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021668237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020110697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15721482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791768432","doi":"","title":"Handy guide to the laws of Ontario","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01981013156628711,"score_gpt":0.2655528205346891,"score_spread":0.24574268896840198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791768432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001007476,0.028739164,0.0011035446,0.016001014,0.0016724902,0.0002480514,0.022584137,0.00059181056,0.9280522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027740907,0.011989805,0.0013029295,0.0016277249,0.00013515152,0.00006247933,0.003053526,0.00014344868,0.9789108],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989423,0.00004140332,0.000047323687,0.00007009446,0.0006894334,0.00020939614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980374,0.0001872173,0.000058649148,0.00007670438,0.0014084993,0.00023145827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006792739,0.00094149937,0.00067589694,0.004798288,0.007095246,0.0044875946,0.0012646171,0.001788324,0.21384798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024396216,0.000903702,0.00048153423,0.008107523,0.0017956233,0.0024425918,0.0011214286,0.0016435182,0.04712226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053692947,0.000008426345,0.00020722245,0.00008256744,0.0000012175637,0.000035922705,0.0004792815,0.000052129337,0.000056067758,0.0153333,0.955893,0.027845506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.917691e-7,8.0670713e-7,0.0005391186,0.000044169814,8.6268676e-7,0.00000978198,0.000122018675,0.000011298401,0.000011221676,0.0004176898,0.998838,0.0000039176184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9833128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99596894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21384798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051719528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.111824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71539277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791788663","doi":"","title":"Saskatchewan. Ministry of Justice and Attorney General","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Christian ministry; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.015902189840457964,"score_gpt":0.2545446179437635,"score_spread":0.23864242810330552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791788663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006151147,0.004231724,0.00026430612,0.026297718,0.003628284,0.00033597223,0.17988308,0.0011155711,0.778092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005610422,0.0014561281,0.00023845417,0.0026730206,0.000063104824,0.000093330505,0.010263228,0.00019826471,0.9794041],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887675,0.00007591621,0.000064108324,0.00014453635,0.0003039635,0.00053470983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977508,0.0002208967,0.00011077447,0.00014189987,0.0011110897,0.0006644605],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006417356,0.0011947983,0.00082431635,0.0030421286,0.0036344652,0.003691455,0.0025060105,0.0028840539,0.5279355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022152816,0.0015398631,0.00081567327,0.0056485785,0.00070109084,0.0014754696,0.0022818912,0.0028179607,0.20204164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054685825,0.0000384322,0.0015916586,0.000105126186,0.0000125224315,0.00008912027,0.000060289374,0.000096161035,0.00006461324,0.0030413296,0.96785396,0.026992066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055240416,0.000010108169,0.015473142,0.00021748929,0.000014053827,0.00003943926,0.00062839687,0.00016789096,0.0001050679,0.0010187615,0.9822384,0.000032014148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93017536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.974152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9727855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027214529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07000383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6733427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791871202","doi":"","title":"The Privy Council and its scholars: Canadian constitutional law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.03825414940355826,"score_gpt":0.252827281990747,"score_spread":0.21457313258718874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791871202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060184165,0.07299806,0.00083143613,0.341373,0.0031725732,0.00007321074,0.0014029301,0.00011527336,0.574015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18696418,0.04517906,0.002146861,0.06900355,0.0017511026,0.0001533525,0.0005413252,0.0002802686,0.6939803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951186,0.0004287822,0.000108452405,0.0004505687,0.002393864,0.0014996829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955462,0.0013248526,0.00014220882,0.00020438034,0.0019784179,0.0008040383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034136872,0.00096996955,0.0007676742,0.005080466,0.030260798,0.02366581,0.0040303986,0.0137205785,0.03835287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01213883,0.0013224889,0.00052295957,0.014900797,0.023603667,0.008783251,0.003343617,0.009443785,0.0024301775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007786932,0.000014020636,0.00021160072,0.000056889163,0.0000031958725,0.000039443006,0.003310294,0.000118821896,0.000025111702,0.5297019,0.45733604,0.009174829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009830933,0.0000025342777,0.0012203279,0.00021995479,0.000009235818,0.000016074788,0.003835456,0.00011162606,0.000037706235,0.042397935,0.95210254,0.000036715566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9952773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78293043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21706957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36360055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9080883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791951286","doi":"","title":"Constitutional law of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01665031955606958,"score_gpt":0.2386969532323604,"score_spread":0.22204663367629082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791951286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055818204,0.012388151,0.00058308,0.038547084,0.0010699602,0.00009781212,0.0027527702,0.00012703492,0.9388523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14586581,0.009361591,0.0016107507,0.017076802,0.00049790496,0.00019906198,0.0011993605,0.0001740809,0.8240146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949254,0.0003422808,0.00012411967,0.00055466814,0.002421406,0.0016321106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99677616,0.00042221366,0.00006693799,0.00020488395,0.0020349447,0.00049486046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019117612,0.0007729944,0.0007677133,0.003315683,0.023218002,0.014642194,0.0025648007,0.00535565,0.034009207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007929557,0.00090839533,0.0006085525,0.005306562,0.006586773,0.0026810851,0.002162922,0.0059625832,0.0027099976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010123529,0.000015854806,0.0004259473,0.00004219127,0.0000067086366,0.00004663076,0.00085387274,0.00018772835,0.00005030124,0.75259864,0.2371689,0.008593052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012361407,0.000005243742,0.0018964628,0.00017111005,0.000014900014,0.00002703221,0.0009789238,0.00019790781,0.00008366026,0.03316841,0.963408,0.000035916968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99446833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8669156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1330844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29677656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9655994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791980093","doi":"","title":"The patriation and amendment of the Constitution of Canada: brief","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Amendment; Law; Political science; First amendment; Supreme court","score_opus":0.012058208940915109,"score_gpt":0.2220442219999909,"score_spread":0.2099860130590758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791980093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012111573,0.09107236,0.0006151431,0.3208048,0.0063277213,0.00015149983,0.0009914669,0.000052164363,0.5678732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26798096,0.0748982,0.00094493205,0.18874776,0.0044193314,0.00023780703,0.0005411134,0.000098213815,0.46213165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99292856,0.0006682491,0.00016026081,0.00039032602,0.002390023,0.0034625884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99600863,0.0012680809,0.0001819031,0.00012650581,0.0018468108,0.00056806055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031668686,0.0006127797,0.0007140927,0.0030762649,0.025584055,0.01377069,0.0031752447,0.020221824,0.00923115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00969119,0.0011434354,0.00076031225,0.0054151425,0.013451313,0.0045589777,0.0024648225,0.013810424,0.0010743217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019308629,0.000029061664,0.0005216421,0.00017772114,0.000010521062,0.00016072774,0.004173071,0.00023977624,0.00011370607,0.59149647,0.38996252,0.013095545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010825254,0.0000071823956,0.003863121,0.00039735134,0.000019794368,0.000043967055,0.00346931,0.00012673391,0.00012854923,0.014785036,0.9770981,0.00004991218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9911504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15161876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15161876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2791861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.984002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791997457","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Constitution 1980: highlights of a proposed resolution respecting the Constitution of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Resolution (logic); Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01809629576969711,"score_gpt":0.23955524935479044,"score_spread":0.22145895358509332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791997457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015807796,0.02189545,0.0014206672,0.2836274,0.0068398193,0.00034418894,0.0009636635,0.000092687216,0.6690083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18499346,0.014847156,0.003806329,0.1917276,0.0024548871,0.0003799902,0.00053071044,0.00019164894,0.60106826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99157107,0.00068626815,0.0001874814,0.0006019946,0.0034455168,0.0035075946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963815,0.0011770881,0.00012431282,0.000095340765,0.0016338814,0.0005877285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004505511,0.0010691829,0.0008788296,0.003942833,0.032321535,0.016509786,0.005453119,0.023984617,0.0085241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013296566,0.0010254272,0.0011189821,0.00709982,0.016367113,0.004023466,0.003626684,0.017789504,0.0008956015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017318333,0.00002259167,0.00030575553,0.00006789796,0.0000071905374,0.00034669912,0.005820455,0.0003298144,0.0001539952,0.6955316,0.2908234,0.0065733823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003199224,0.000010288946,0.00304501,0.00033802786,0.000031959367,0.000075610704,0.0066157724,0.00027742493,0.0002212046,0.028492255,0.96075416,0.000106197695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9934087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99698716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21473339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21473339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34294486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91079795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792031039","doi":"","title":"Epitome of the laws of Nova-Scotia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Epitome; Law; Nova (rocket); Political science; History; Art; Archaeology; Engineering; Literature; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.030450444945208564,"score_gpt":0.28528420085373685,"score_spread":0.2548337559085283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792031039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008771387,0.029203672,0.00032420756,0.03674773,0.008333425,0.00005963473,0.0064774603,0.00023031892,0.9098521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036163997,0.006493253,0.00031471765,0.004674574,0.0005332249,0.000024793537,0.00096321054,0.00009569418,0.9507364],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994549,0.000026737496,0.000021253214,0.00005592058,0.0002742171,0.00016691202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992091,0.00014064024,0.000049117887,0.00004318254,0.0004197365,0.00013823461],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002611343,0.00039942987,0.00030630353,0.0019609157,0.0051537864,0.005156511,0.0006735643,0.0015238291,0.048905045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017754177,0.0003048245,0.00023478366,0.003716311,0.0020737555,0.0010571117,0.0007692387,0.0018831511,0.0062793815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003584071,0.000008784602,0.00072352675,0.0001769456,0.0000040608493,0.00029264964,0.0018682339,0.00008073957,0.00035886734,0.101129115,0.8674799,0.027841335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023967068,0.000002328544,0.0036084894,0.00010623138,0.000002023481,0.000054180844,0.0005084815,0.00002227593,0.000046230063,0.00072911876,0.99491274,0.000005461201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95055175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98098147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04944825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019484786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030817078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16360366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792087757","doi":"","title":"Strengthening the Canadian Federation: the Constitution Amendment, 1987","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Amendment; Political science; Law; Constitutional amendment","score_opus":0.0287846970382129,"score_gpt":0.26462097990311934,"score_spread":0.23583628286490643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792087757","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010844707,0.06604002,0.001158534,0.19009386,0.0046013957,0.0002862418,0.0034129198,0.00013736651,0.72342503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21877919,0.02350341,0.0032024556,0.09524464,0.0015308231,0.00045236116,0.0009901199,0.0001863255,0.65611076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99427503,0.00055279204,0.00020162495,0.0004404549,0.0022771184,0.0022529876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969476,0.00065607385,0.00013097767,0.00016374675,0.0016925589,0.00040908376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039831456,0.0010418697,0.0007044537,0.0023155822,0.024756026,0.0094667,0.002877144,0.016467249,0.014039106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013295589,0.0014933243,0.00065131264,0.0050814953,0.010737969,0.0050067673,0.0026210845,0.010761995,0.0014340892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027220323,0.000038664602,0.00086392194,0.00008513319,0.000009429494,0.00011182311,0.0031978285,0.00030531664,0.00007717064,0.54180056,0.44184133,0.011641545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036014015,0.00001024127,0.0073247096,0.00042195673,0.000027322452,0.000044315613,0.0025965327,0.00015113266,0.00015922044,0.023843635,0.96530294,0.000081924496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9928698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99738485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.120100245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.120100245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32749516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87139237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792105996","doi":"","title":"In the Supreme Court of Canada (On appeal from the Court of Appeal for British Columbia), Between Robin Susan Eldridge, John Henry [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; High Court; Political science","score_opus":0.01754934945317628,"score_gpt":0.2408787006667318,"score_spread":0.22332935121355552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792105996","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01855301,0.016380418,0.0016140306,0.54508024,0.018660853,0.00025485278,0.0038872568,0.0003206273,0.3952488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.086047456,0.0031842864,0.0012336525,0.28029832,0.0016077054,0.00013314174,0.0007198543,0.00017824525,0.62659734],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966953,0.00018208874,0.000076663135,0.00034670596,0.0013291816,0.0013700593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788195,0.00044279743,0.00004004576,0.000042924745,0.0010709788,0.0005212928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016667743,0.0006970419,0.00071739504,0.001068605,0.03833632,0.011004263,0.0026915555,0.018386025,0.019323668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073935804,0.0008366972,0.0009363528,0.0020379694,0.004152626,0.0024162948,0.0017623376,0.017235588,0.0035332309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018274131,0.00001337256,0.00083454617,0.000026962714,0.000009651378,0.00023061717,0.0012133287,0.00007776018,0.00016133072,0.031538412,0.9605226,0.005353255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002571792,0.000013250677,0.006304675,0.00018975986,0.000059682123,0.00010133989,0.008036256,0.0003547286,0.00048387793,0.0065040127,0.9778236,0.00010297464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98531497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9968432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04998807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04998807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09373261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3626905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792166187","doi":"10.3138/tjt.2017-0221","title":"“A Serious Playfulness”: The Theological Legacy of Joseph C. McLelland","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Criticism; Philosophy; Religious studies; Sociology; Classics; History; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.025964769047518297,"score_gpt":0.32102866701859106,"score_spread":0.29506389797107274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792166187","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06406666,0.090176076,0.0024918485,0.60651016,0.0077059595,0.000029745832,0.00003610584,0.00006218252,0.22892123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87519425,0.014083347,0.0007898305,0.05222112,0.0026949034,0.00003789093,0.00001697758,0.00010028649,0.054861486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963372,0.0023739152,0.000043497897,0.0002631741,0.00060326647,0.00037903595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955391,0.002713222,0.00027817642,0.00022155687,0.00067064277,0.0005772501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049909316,0.00024599678,0.00032334798,0.00073875766,0.011712135,0.007836164,0.0011770619,0.0029613147,0.0022143375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009941232,0.00023425193,0.000120304656,0.00070619595,0.03603521,0.005016983,0.0032756918,0.007697191,0.00030680507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040750558,0.000024611722,0.00049712945,0.00007530016,0.000005269394,0.0002900902,0.16684458,0.00009639914,0.00019994512,0.67807686,0.13439506,0.01945409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011745803,0.000017313474,0.000632458,0.00032739443,0.0000041304847,0.00015946354,0.034317892,0.00016332576,0.00023942879,0.04029749,0.92380166,0.000027715392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061100446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09811825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061100446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012817798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059761954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.121489644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792196365","doi":"","title":"The provincial statutes of Lower-Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.011708496137543663,"score_gpt":0.23378756396726896,"score_spread":0.2220790678297253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792196365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005195917,0.014959266,0.00070966844,0.023905832,0.0014012749,0.00007658245,0.016911777,0.00024013237,0.93659955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07354668,0.0057368656,0.0011632387,0.00535188,0.00016643811,0.00005367574,0.0040061222,0.00014791824,0.90982705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982668,0.000059745074,0.00003733396,0.00010789317,0.0009823743,0.00054576667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772936,0.00013255456,0.00005701378,0.00007099575,0.0017474617,0.00026272403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000609881,0.00048730243,0.0003555062,0.0022509089,0.01021357,0.0051847226,0.0012791777,0.0015737871,0.053413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035424125,0.00047404363,0.0003309961,0.005311449,0.0019243439,0.0014567696,0.0009067095,0.0024727925,0.0059618116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017226992,0.000011913923,0.0016465897,0.00006462429,0.0000035994346,0.00004480349,0.0008666535,0.0001285205,0.00008360948,0.15984032,0.8114924,0.02579975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000409065,0.0000023704097,0.0063788104,0.00009968569,0.000005953376,0.000022410411,0.00069842924,0.00011509853,0.00010349867,0.0031543572,0.9894014,0.000013731883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99845886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08434367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08434367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1578986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61195904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792211049","doi":"","title":"Statutes of Manitoba = Lois du Manitoba.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Gerontology; Political science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.019603628502542228,"score_gpt":0.2398045326922512,"score_spread":0.22020090418970895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792211049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068332907,0.020483186,0.0005110562,0.01966227,0.0020105215,0.00023222572,0.04356964,0.0005703691,0.90612733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035806336,0.008340188,0.0012436864,0.0054859943,0.00020687444,0.00021258609,0.008264725,0.00016250092,0.9402771],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991955,0.000050719107,0.00003254618,0.00007787502,0.00039463918,0.00024877192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843985,0.00013484844,0.000083341794,0.000079674246,0.0011002604,0.00016205532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005480975,0.0006790966,0.00046094763,0.002825567,0.00660065,0.0032500126,0.0019346183,0.0018373155,0.07760767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001922287,0.0008411522,0.0003363685,0.0072248867,0.0015678208,0.0011827354,0.00086688297,0.002316964,0.013789859],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018282191,0.000020808906,0.00224148,0.00014488268,0.000008011408,0.0000859413,0.0011951555,0.00008526031,0.00020172233,0.0655584,0.90758276,0.022857161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008242619,0.0000046042146,0.013191172,0.00017731795,0.000007056325,0.00003433108,0.00096880016,0.000056591158,0.00012443449,0.0012911923,0.98412055,0.000015697451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98582804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99450076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07760767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036334243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07386745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26362467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792284299","doi":"","title":"Index to the Statutes of Alberta: supplement to the second edition.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Statute; Law; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.014558441405814438,"score_gpt":0.2553271261904215,"score_spread":0.24076868478460708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792284299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011340976,0.044786084,0.00083586643,0.011179306,0.012963962,0.0001640013,0.03833254,0.0012016657,0.88940245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038823676,0.012483839,0.0007496084,0.001926001,0.0012656008,0.00004615203,0.010212286,0.00027074476,0.9691635],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993643,0.000023070144,0.000019670126,0.000045014847,0.00043263676,0.00011527022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977447,0.00019699692,0.00005801959,0.00008489879,0.001747066,0.00016823769],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003493723,0.0010395888,0.0008893759,0.006588701,0.003187584,0.003055419,0.0018343359,0.0012263493,0.31598008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017920894,0.0005360112,0.00046391378,0.013341811,0.0010693632,0.0017521824,0.0009998784,0.0016005451,0.11106892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043690025,0.0000049688438,0.000055852604,0.00004637459,7.17295e-7,0.000009976397,0.000035626552,0.000029583794,0.000027230564,0.0015146543,0.9880094,0.010261343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016116112,0.0000015167058,0.0010155914,0.00007710776,0.0000019822023,0.00001862962,0.000088067725,0.000021278534,0.00003073398,0.00062228896,0.9981153,0.0000058981163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83934903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.910373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31598008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018213935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024985736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9756714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792315035","doi":"","title":"Ontario. Legislative Assembly. Select Committee on Constitutional and Intergovernmental Affairs","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Public administration; General assembly; Law","score_opus":0.020953462134790456,"score_gpt":0.26430350871536484,"score_spread":0.24335004658057438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792315035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011688462,0.004569672,0.0004999784,0.03642145,0.0045870994,0.0010966768,0.09009528,0.0009833312,0.86057776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0039888243,0.0020191586,0.0007433295,0.008203459,0.00037806507,0.0005461849,0.011266232,0.00028223265,0.9725725],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99145424,0.0003369467,0.00033749177,0.0006109322,0.005436234,0.0018241571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98487675,0.0011075615,0.00034064884,0.0005577186,0.011499959,0.0016174425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046576406,0.001325562,0.001576413,0.0055768173,0.013717552,0.006683756,0.0037905986,0.0065671946,0.22223409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00838701,0.0020513204,0.0013154204,0.012084532,0.0022753314,0.0022850654,0.0016556972,0.005199271,0.08496426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014088995,0.0000076955075,0.00018488849,0.00007151005,0.000003815497,0.000017478042,0.0000853454,0.000019456298,0.000061580875,0.0030261048,0.99211097,0.0043970523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012986273,0.0000022128297,0.0027564256,0.0001014906,0.000009425092,0.0000035014134,0.00013390309,0.000026443055,0.000055806227,0.00023818322,0.99664766,0.000012033224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9851252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99436694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91777515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08222487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19445173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74344707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792482631","doi":"","title":"The Canadian abridgment, second edition. Index to Canadian Legal Literature","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); History; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.011439405573109275,"score_gpt":0.24320847779810317,"score_spread":0.2317690722249939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792482631","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00072184525,0.2687532,0.00070054136,0.01944947,0.010265636,0.00011461426,0.026994513,0.0007041745,0.67229605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0056855446,0.11538023,0.0010985485,0.0030594424,0.0013987959,0.000068965484,0.007411488,0.00033445336,0.86556256],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896073,0.000030065945,0.000040261966,0.00008508977,0.0007376259,0.0001462432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758685,0.00018734117,0.0000646652,0.00006676435,0.0018223608,0.00027205053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058206473,0.0012902858,0.0010286592,0.014258659,0.0068669994,0.006210258,0.0020471418,0.00126994,0.24961688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00401229,0.00067545555,0.00053761987,0.029016051,0.0023668918,0.0038102167,0.001422086,0.0017462117,0.06102724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003452331,0.0000023981268,0.00007255268,0.0001298742,0.0000011576394,0.00001551045,0.000088513734,0.000021760925,0.000021065842,0.0032307445,0.9733209,0.023092134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.37463e-7,7.106006e-7,0.0005940401,0.00015560086,0.000002099659,0.000021914346,0.00011196314,0.000009770298,0.000011664323,0.0005383076,0.99854845,0.000004548722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9474969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9804591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24961688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04734701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06543771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83505166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792519585","doi":"","title":"Canadian constitutional law in a modern perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Constitutional law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.019238556823360287,"score_gpt":0.26425012786425184,"score_spread":0.24501157104089155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792519585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029520162,0.04572274,0.0017419454,0.10803936,0.0020439208,0.000040172697,0.0009667531,0.00014659218,0.8383465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25402078,0.08978875,0.008074954,0.039683234,0.003979283,0.0001695511,0.0009084089,0.00033687378,0.6030382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957344,0.00043607215,0.00010811809,0.000438808,0.0022370424,0.001045596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963838,0.0007259551,0.0001139876,0.00020179414,0.0020395282,0.00053493306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026179836,0.0010673093,0.000942748,0.010569845,0.021978972,0.018717296,0.0033754958,0.0049318834,0.030716592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065377722,0.0008214911,0.0005423108,0.01704189,0.022041688,0.0059248763,0.0019481287,0.006836337,0.0016707663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025286738,0.00000610162,0.00012269279,0.00004056905,0.0000030635788,0.000022822987,0.00085062825,0.00013653719,0.000022360427,0.9012647,0.089488775,0.008039195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005494843,0.0000028929014,0.0010236757,0.0001648288,0.000010292549,0.00002715017,0.0011764683,0.00018085905,0.000037945058,0.083230816,0.91411203,0.000027588325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99305975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2177336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2177336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24333489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9073181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792573176","doi":"","title":"Statutes of Saskatchewan judicially considered, 1965-1978.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Statute of limitations; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.020735975737622665,"score_gpt":0.2589427486646218,"score_spread":0.23820677292699913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792573176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018696878,0.020389816,0.0007812526,0.015389432,0.0018307437,0.00029377927,0.07865367,0.00033556693,0.8636289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07524676,0.008236692,0.0011350019,0.004578651,0.00011578559,0.00025732216,0.011566033,0.00008733022,0.89877635],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816245,0.000107874796,0.0001180361,0.00019338701,0.00083489384,0.0005834638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99657756,0.00045540236,0.00015267765,0.00017323047,0.0024378814,0.00020322305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009293716,0.00079942134,0.0004657426,0.0038803753,0.0069558006,0.005191013,0.0016875667,0.002504397,0.03833113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00550343,0.0012020568,0.00035812004,0.009014855,0.0021625194,0.001867855,0.0012541733,0.0036955173,0.009568826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008362383,0.00003899268,0.004688082,0.0001779462,0.000018637695,0.0002669552,0.001878877,0.00046873104,0.0003959817,0.14270306,0.8136871,0.03559196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030104811,0.000009563152,0.033634998,0.0004294735,0.000029519151,0.00006002355,0.0021620363,0.00019168266,0.0005183088,0.0069659823,0.9559101,0.000058151632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.974391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99359715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07119863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07119863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13178408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51658463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792780372","doi":"","title":"British Columbia. Legislative Assembly. Special Committee on Constitutional Matters","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Legislative assembly; General assembly; Law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.02153820829006628,"score_gpt":0.26421642961953984,"score_spread":0.24267822132947356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792780372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010673323,0.011924379,0.00044200706,0.053379074,0.012041192,0.00048137576,0.07837258,0.0012972435,0.84099483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032976682,0.0026261068,0.0004912077,0.013286726,0.0004844014,0.00034210444,0.0073383166,0.00035089417,0.97178257],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964528,0.00023847142,0.00023304655,0.00043649538,0.001859758,0.0007793968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928722,0.0010211722,0.0002288464,0.00043964325,0.0046439148,0.0007942313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025672405,0.0015954769,0.0016573471,0.0050691264,0.010003257,0.007425937,0.004518943,0.009936325,0.2859521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006776648,0.0019522272,0.0011425393,0.011112231,0.0019537664,0.0022685037,0.001717007,0.009248934,0.11979405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010173752,0.000008840525,0.00009708552,0.00006777493,0.0000028515542,0.000016874024,0.00003062095,0.00002789032,0.000048694073,0.0021169705,0.9921228,0.0054492927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010882615,0.0000020990726,0.0019298278,0.00021019013,0.0000099995905,0.0000063965344,0.00014946776,0.000031248383,0.00008350617,0.00043660428,0.9971125,0.00001742505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9430834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9697973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9686087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031391338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07119261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.956605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792781619","doi":"","title":"Report of the Canadian Bar Association.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Geography; Philosophy; Meteorology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.016522969895768336,"score_gpt":0.2482758187746218,"score_spread":0.23175284887885345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792781619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058960645,0.027316153,0.00044799145,0.07331346,0.014351524,0.00043737714,0.19469972,0.0006331169,0.68290454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0145926885,0.011466485,0.00075478683,0.0054796454,0.00053966924,0.00018215984,0.027669804,0.00013345706,0.9391813],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968364,0.000064752385,0.000095383846,0.00018409683,0.002275034,0.0005441773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920494,0.00020978501,0.00014026929,0.00016065888,0.0065849535,0.0008549931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014978481,0.00089481595,0.0005397579,0.0035166428,0.004107824,0.0038146153,0.0016529149,0.003038319,0.09382953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044732275,0.0006652707,0.0005068209,0.005450629,0.0008838005,0.0015176537,0.0011550472,0.00290899,0.022167679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015156487,0.000012276896,0.00074914837,0.000047969548,0.0000031920022,0.000016808524,0.000048971815,0.000021038386,0.000030380448,0.0013038077,0.9902284,0.007522835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065456534,0.000004421077,0.013410249,0.000105378465,0.000008612621,0.000021426215,0.00042031606,0.000037287136,0.00007505657,0.00020661874,0.9856888,0.000015168052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9751702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9859611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9799695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020030485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10403123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31389105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792854116","doi":"","title":"The consolidated orders in council of Canada ...","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.024852416755865758,"score_gpt":0.23418550060092927,"score_spread":0.20933308384506352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792854116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00471285,0.015175584,0.00071561465,0.06303855,0.0038538894,0.000100791214,0.008647567,0.00041904207,0.90333605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03153792,0.004180748,0.00082008686,0.006796412,0.00018149658,0.000026901882,0.0013683805,0.00016922067,0.95491886],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793315,0.00006902374,0.000036960406,0.00012566424,0.0012528725,0.0005822315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972089,0.00012641367,0.000057314977,0.000067292145,0.0020926567,0.0004473904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073689886,0.0005065188,0.00033565352,0.00168198,0.011734681,0.007546559,0.0011610643,0.002272162,0.07005218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033246868,0.00048068495,0.0002901304,0.004188242,0.0023258307,0.0018367857,0.0011820974,0.003168853,0.008772808],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075861312,0.0000067305164,0.0005158321,0.000035378165,0.0000016539046,0.00003682945,0.0006355398,0.00005042407,0.000043056676,0.04468087,0.9369478,0.017038312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019847273,0.0000016140552,0.0018822779,0.000042979143,0.0000019725037,0.000011974918,0.00060033804,0.000037456415,0.000046074463,0.00079675653,0.9965677,0.000008877574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.992242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07052758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07052758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16336337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5117158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792878582","doi":"","title":"Constitutional law of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01665031955606958,"score_gpt":0.2386969532323604,"score_spread":0.22204663367629082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792878582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055818204,0.012388151,0.00058308,0.038547084,0.0010699602,0.00009781212,0.0027527702,0.00012703492,0.9388523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14586581,0.009361591,0.0016107507,0.017076802,0.00049790496,0.00019906198,0.0011993605,0.0001740809,0.8240146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949254,0.0003422808,0.00012411967,0.00055466814,0.002421406,0.0016321106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99677616,0.00042221366,0.00006693799,0.00020488395,0.0020349447,0.00049486046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019117612,0.0007729944,0.0007677133,0.003315683,0.023218002,0.014642194,0.0025648007,0.00535565,0.034009207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007929557,0.00090839533,0.0006085525,0.005306562,0.006586773,0.0026810851,0.002162922,0.0059625832,0.0027099976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010123529,0.000015854806,0.0004259473,0.00004219127,0.0000067086366,0.00004663076,0.00085387274,0.00018772835,0.00005030124,0.75259864,0.2371689,0.008593052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012361407,0.000005243742,0.0018964628,0.00017111005,0.000014900014,0.00002703221,0.0009789238,0.00019790781,0.00008366026,0.03316841,0.963408,0.000035916968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99446833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1330844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1330844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29677656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9655994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792955554","doi":"","title":"Halsbury's Laws of Canada. Customs and excise","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excise; International trade; Law; Customs union; Business; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.013547986315412113,"score_gpt":0.23297933061785459,"score_spread":0.21943134430244246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792955554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003462318,0.03588693,0.00053197355,0.024476811,0.0021396927,0.00007938332,0.008082579,0.0002489188,0.9250913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04404144,0.013513328,0.0007865583,0.0056404825,0.00018819832,0.000036551817,0.0017857208,0.00014060964,0.9338671],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795806,0.000061116094,0.000047499132,0.000121063305,0.0012734955,0.0005386951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846005,0.00010804525,0.000046065466,0.000048172253,0.0011708594,0.00016678438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055803324,0.00072769565,0.00044145822,0.003082773,0.010453962,0.0062207174,0.0015733705,0.002519179,0.05187982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00266844,0.000646596,0.0004351549,0.0050424826,0.0029562213,0.0018579005,0.001049775,0.003047748,0.007839653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010064675,0.000011826761,0.0005542849,0.00007261676,0.0000030824365,0.00007172038,0.0008656028,0.00007782547,0.000063761516,0.08294404,0.88449097,0.030834327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021850622,0.0000017660055,0.0023623765,0.00009859052,0.0000038341827,0.000026233238,0.00060473493,0.00003020104,0.000058042122,0.001677919,0.9951212,0.00001287197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99557686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06733793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06733793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15161362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4885732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792988424","doi":"","title":"The consolidated statutes for Upper Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.01685241843464094,"score_gpt":0.2559071244284409,"score_spread":0.23905470599379994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792988424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043893144,0.018313877,0.0013977031,0.03184777,0.003344095,0.00026499483,0.046738196,0.0006209875,0.8930831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033175044,0.0068961633,0.0026509566,0.00977441,0.00027188318,0.00015163915,0.009144505,0.00027531353,0.9376601],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949421,0.0001273469,0.00011262305,0.00027556138,0.0033192497,0.0012230475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948053,0.00024867698,0.00009285841,0.00017429993,0.004111635,0.00056725065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014743832,0.0008316926,0.0005963922,0.0038213094,0.01072204,0.008351698,0.002566265,0.003435899,0.05843923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00607057,0.00095848535,0.0006492736,0.008214334,0.0024893142,0.0020818154,0.0017332548,0.0051540313,0.010061602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012163217,0.000017954228,0.00070984813,0.00005341623,0.000004172363,0.00003498948,0.0003034615,0.000113918,0.000067882465,0.07552476,0.9037339,0.019423459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005245814,0.0000025582322,0.0042327843,0.00010906789,0.0000069938014,0.000017681827,0.00039837303,0.00009177346,0.00010727082,0.0022658708,0.9927376,0.000024805822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9961028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99811965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10225611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10225611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28706357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74192345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793026735","doi":"","title":"The revised statutes of Nova-Scotia : second series","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Series (stratigraphy); Statute; Political science; History; Law; Geology; Archaeology; Engineering; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.018123166798605237,"score_gpt":0.2536717292926931,"score_spread":0.23554856249408787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793026735","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02997338,0.03897392,0.002411221,0.08981074,0.040216558,0.00073355477,0.03440399,0.00096969877,0.76250696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05502768,0.009117862,0.002306663,0.010749406,0.0013248071,0.00015999796,0.0049104895,0.000290827,0.9161121],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99577844,0.00016896456,0.00023295436,0.00032045282,0.0023983612,0.001100893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901074,0.0008649431,0.000324713,0.0006102885,0.0073847026,0.00070801796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025880802,0.00062204164,0.0005689475,0.005481291,0.0057510864,0.00883221,0.00230737,0.0039834483,0.026841778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012460192,0.00088906544,0.00063961855,0.007053292,0.0023319833,0.0019961598,0.0017985769,0.0045307735,0.00597188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042444535,0.000021521044,0.0017095722,0.00019834957,0.000009095575,0.0002174635,0.0013225721,0.0003260121,0.0004343952,0.053752463,0.8977424,0.044223797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075218777,0.000006273997,0.0109756095,0.0001860207,0.0000090585745,0.00005270455,0.0004664936,0.00010546848,0.0001745822,0.0010014725,0.9869862,0.000028531687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9720443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98172116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93753356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062466446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12556788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45322788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793058798","doi":"","title":"First principles, second thoughts: Aboriginal peoples, constitutional reform, and Canadian statecraft","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Political economy; Law; Development economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.017121449876318813,"score_gpt":0.25588349225261736,"score_spread":0.23876204237629856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793058798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010008454,0.12883233,0.0011009573,0.12009542,0.0022314454,0.000059665963,0.00036510642,0.00007050337,0.73723614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35629433,0.04988905,0.0016297251,0.02581066,0.0014516143,0.000120641525,0.00024873292,0.00011528175,0.56443995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987735,0.00017977097,0.000024057952,0.00010072405,0.0004369524,0.0004849779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993525,0.00025524758,0.000036357847,0.000037196554,0.00020736823,0.00011127804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001070466,0.00066531857,0.0004231179,0.0021421206,0.016444629,0.010190583,0.0017855444,0.003971285,0.014239476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025202564,0.00039941483,0.00030037944,0.0047128303,0.02590701,0.0038852403,0.0015766473,0.004744344,0.0007289568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008228323,0.000011847769,0.00029593392,0.00006839059,0.0000034944135,0.000066129214,0.016060079,0.00007583118,0.000048080026,0.8494951,0.12182567,0.012041239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000141762,0.000006370013,0.0028900618,0.00042762083,0.000010977086,0.00007387502,0.02175671,0.00009716561,0.000087416076,0.11751943,0.85708475,0.000031450436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9816742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99240583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075049035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.075049035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1087368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54452145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793060671","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Constitution and constitutional amendment: highlights = [La Constitution canadienne et sa modification: sommaire]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.025062006615031347,"score_gpt":0.2630561485837412,"score_spread":0.23799414196870985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793060671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032794788,0.11084041,0.0008101896,0.28451502,0.0108947465,0.00011335201,0.0016403736,0.00013135126,0.587775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15045516,0.11540613,0.0032504308,0.14003578,0.008693992,0.0002582473,0.0011823847,0.00036048057,0.5803574],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995529,0.00053720095,0.00010598521,0.00040217783,0.0020539549,0.0013717462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973322,0.0007223692,0.00009108097,0.000112432346,0.0013863087,0.00035564968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030884554,0.0010744454,0.0007923292,0.0041612973,0.023004223,0.018789195,0.0030992578,0.010250391,0.020621842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069105304,0.000814733,0.0009571895,0.013018377,0.018846942,0.0049713063,0.0023506496,0.008097719,0.0018415212],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006185282,0.0000127657995,0.00017045757,0.00013016633,0.000005309998,0.00003939316,0.0021319035,0.00012177209,0.000044628545,0.49048895,0.4980741,0.0087743625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070272836,0.0000018408534,0.0015558525,0.0002094326,0.000009408972,0.000023733443,0.0020804938,0.000058397993,0.000046717276,0.01693842,0.97903514,0.00003350439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16616829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16616829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33706602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9671266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793098840","doi":"","title":"Constitutional law of Canada: cases, notes and materials, second edition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.017385713057338353,"score_gpt":0.2318292100849325,"score_spread":0.21444349702759416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793098840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003495001,0.097013496,0.0016634242,0.025469815,0.002526145,0.00029215755,0.012462197,0.00045756885,0.8566202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05128081,0.063527174,0.0035291188,0.011803084,0.0009150779,0.0003897214,0.0048235226,0.00033429745,0.8633972],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811125,0.00007609234,0.000058117173,0.00012358914,0.0011997275,0.00043127322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982255,0.0003879222,0.000052765114,0.00009705794,0.0010558051,0.0001810874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010995242,0.00094733643,0.0008093421,0.005789692,0.010350099,0.010025357,0.0032789614,0.004110347,0.048780046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004327204,0.0011137553,0.0005358523,0.012243029,0.006136452,0.0024446482,0.0013228921,0.0027097103,0.0054637734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006690321,0.000017452585,0.00018772641,0.00014654249,0.0000036761141,0.000038115988,0.0007041228,0.00023659004,0.000068467794,0.10996187,0.86968017,0.018948585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053765098,0.0000023080809,0.0013531338,0.00025611237,0.0000072287053,0.00003146979,0.0007075847,0.00009103664,0.000083031104,0.007949571,0.9894922,0.000020961941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9908668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09743425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09743425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1943911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70693827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793178252","doi":"","title":"Acts of the General Assembly of Newfoundland: passed in the nineteenth year of the reign of His Majesty King George V","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reign; George (robot); Majesty; Ancient history; Art; History; Archaeology; Law; Art history; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.021370649955524977,"score_gpt":0.2562147992470349,"score_spread":0.2348441492915099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793178252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.122797444,0.011174432,0.0008563131,0.08843182,0.0065861465,0.0002080426,0.0038000876,0.0002504113,0.76589525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15179567,0.0013740457,0.0005284528,0.015717994,0.00022425975,0.0000515146,0.0004057167,0.00008796404,0.8298143],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659663,0.0002521051,0.000105723746,0.00031213768,0.00086585263,0.0018675086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997672,0.00038787298,0.00017454017,0.00017102704,0.0011187496,0.00047563043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018124585,0.0005335888,0.00042227213,0.0010556465,0.019197099,0.005555117,0.0014060964,0.0057244925,0.014047716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006543163,0.0008031172,0.0004339127,0.0012506399,0.004774715,0.0013526421,0.002881444,0.008836682,0.0018817595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014452005,0.00006992886,0.01094329,0.00012914,0.000058752168,0.0017341521,0.015592295,0.00039463717,0.0009032887,0.13934976,0.80079406,0.029886132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012329683,0.000015228307,0.0315455,0.00015406073,0.000022964428,0.00012051967,0.0061443197,0.000059586215,0.0005869697,0.001023266,0.96025574,0.000059495997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9804332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057138447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057138447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06103006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41457033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793197964","doi":"","title":"The Canadian constitution: historically explained by annotated statutes original documents and leading cases","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Statute; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.019852782486698115,"score_gpt":0.26944791308609384,"score_spread":0.24959513059939573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793197964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008753156,0.017155733,0.0021215777,0.030864684,0.0022984373,0.00015472127,0.008672321,0.00029471357,0.9296847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33198515,0.048119374,0.009735163,0.01429705,0.0010721539,0.0003310255,0.007243648,0.00090735167,0.5863091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930855,0.00040572532,0.00015709572,0.0005315889,0.0043939585,0.0014260954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938207,0.0011309392,0.00023527467,0.00036823386,0.0041425503,0.00030230384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027712593,0.0011522301,0.00048978964,0.017395409,0.021250248,0.01421454,0.0021533526,0.0026278032,0.017402569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011436967,0.0009293623,0.00050864887,0.03999951,0.014779685,0.0032758166,0.0018340059,0.0043870783,0.0018843808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012024586,0.000009856502,0.0005449241,0.000111048415,0.0000053012404,0.00009840437,0.00632173,0.00022408085,0.000114534574,0.63157624,0.33511567,0.025866186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030463686,0.0000014449874,0.0033661353,0.0002796105,0.000009989192,0.000029849989,0.0026065437,0.0001057475,0.00010724624,0.009884662,0.98357004,0.00003556768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9959037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99772185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20059898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20059898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27890587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92719185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793254081","doi":"","title":"In the Supreme Court of Canada (on appeal from the Appeal Division of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia) between Her Majesty","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Majesty; Law; Nova scotia; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.024724982311913432,"score_gpt":0.25506598140421327,"score_spread":0.23034099909229983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793254081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.064183556,0.01239185,0.0016162689,0.2763186,0.010238299,0.00033641938,0.0038084125,0.00028424693,0.6308223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17065068,0.0019701705,0.0010549567,0.09403932,0.00068299676,0.00007656013,0.00044950139,0.00010513253,0.7309706],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970373,0.00014610658,0.00006611579,0.00031766074,0.0009689542,0.0014639145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979944,0.00044542892,0.000045275356,0.000048663776,0.00084258185,0.00062366435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012589181,0.0005004704,0.00060961605,0.0010627533,0.03231116,0.010652064,0.0022327364,0.013381079,0.014763168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005794934,0.00084353844,0.00084198295,0.0014871131,0.00346343,0.0014894805,0.0014068446,0.010321194,0.0017975911],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000682168,0.00004048895,0.0045649465,0.00006840769,0.000035677473,0.0011747793,0.003925889,0.00028660503,0.00061826926,0.1728313,0.8065348,0.009850721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044708428,0.000023488255,0.017690012,0.00022631916,0.00009502869,0.00018713946,0.0081744585,0.00073755934,0.0009636785,0.009682413,0.96204466,0.00013061376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99157566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99849653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07163198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07163198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12335829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51972884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793317028","doi":"","title":"Tables to the statutes of Saskatchewan and Saskatchewan regulations.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.014847280400379075,"score_gpt":0.246779970539724,"score_spread":0.23193269013934492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793317028","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018612113,0.0023737526,0.0015204286,0.0067503946,0.0021322812,0.00056670053,0.10888674,0.0009421286,0.8749664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011607813,0.0027238005,0.0030153259,0.005820535,0.00016541865,0.00047002247,0.042366713,0.00041024052,0.9334202],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979,0.0002093401,0.00012630454,0.00022119388,0.0009788166,0.00056435383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915183,0.0009688781,0.0002030776,0.00040951272,0.0064690476,0.0004311557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013410955,0.0009831046,0.00065522315,0.005997697,0.0050298427,0.0049796393,0.0025154396,0.002602591,0.26917812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006780639,0.0010322246,0.000701969,0.014778443,0.0013610091,0.0022873245,0.001230615,0.0030134318,0.08289161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014451073,0.0000206081,0.0004935748,0.000059023976,0.000003974807,0.000023832881,0.00013120267,0.00013135541,0.00008221046,0.015392282,0.97213554,0.011512049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012012689,0.000004075034,0.004232893,0.00015297464,0.0000057886114,0.000014987921,0.00044362343,0.00014062691,0.00012376312,0.0030193492,0.9918243,0.00002563726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93823814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97685117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26917812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03437108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09378319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9004905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793412683","doi":"","title":"Statutes of the province of Newfoundland and Labrador.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Geography; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.012679185404558688,"score_gpt":0.23931313476085542,"score_spread":0.22663394935629672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793412683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009747668,0.013987186,0.00073650834,0.015894035,0.0017692518,0.00023834212,0.089780934,0.00051512884,0.8673309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045091882,0.005570916,0.0014392952,0.0035157953,0.00019438604,0.00016984818,0.019501328,0.00013993066,0.92437655],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802077,0.00011897856,0.000086606386,0.00016856325,0.0008165304,0.0007885786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99591345,0.0005480162,0.00025352204,0.00022383273,0.0026899506,0.00037115905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009569697,0.0006309448,0.0004979937,0.0037462942,0.006529026,0.0035814252,0.0017179365,0.0016472333,0.05113521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044752792,0.000812655,0.00041701572,0.0071518063,0.0017436483,0.001327397,0.00094450166,0.0023204165,0.0070912493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028226927,0.000023502816,0.002646941,0.00010227128,0.000009498533,0.000065016444,0.0005342339,0.00016167654,0.00007485196,0.04146754,0.9313542,0.023531955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011609162,0.0000074311824,0.03173741,0.00022435679,0.000015321815,0.000036487883,0.0008372444,0.00012271086,0.00013816633,0.00092474004,0.9659154,0.000029132374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99343646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05472284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05472284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08817979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39704388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793426064","doi":"","title":"[Term 17 of the Terms of Union between Newfoundland and Canada respecting denominational education rights: information kit]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Term (time); Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.010097844544984518,"score_gpt":0.23872164164692206,"score_spread":0.22862379710193753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793426064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032926446,0.006219359,0.0007474656,0.0177642,0.0041854694,0.00015214103,0.0032118708,0.00024358019,0.9641832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02659275,0.0025191486,0.0009489593,0.01093278,0.0005200226,0.00012948435,0.000812874,0.00018203085,0.95736194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974273,0.00017202007,0.00012913095,0.00021825716,0.0009746345,0.0010785977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836904,0.0003363488,0.00009004333,0.00010284781,0.00091832544,0.00018337245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012446482,0.0006838871,0.0005875861,0.0026146886,0.0129701495,0.0099818455,0.0020352895,0.0055715735,0.05006015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037784744,0.0007216336,0.0005618278,0.0046464903,0.005663342,0.0035443874,0.0018775718,0.0055122767,0.010717291],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001576173,0.000013597403,0.0003510477,0.000074143754,0.000003896405,0.00010640126,0.0028195481,0.000055876244,0.00013626124,0.16605379,0.8175657,0.012803965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026691596,0.0000038180124,0.0014744584,0.00008140833,0.0000028750144,0.00003378421,0.00093825883,0.000021765763,0.00005788173,0.0014188014,0.99594563,0.000018677601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97320163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05006015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041690387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06848532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30248636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793502496","doi":"","title":"The revised statutes of Newfoundland, 1970 : a revision and consolidation of the public general statutes of Newfoundland as […]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Consolidation (business); Law; Political science; Business; Accounting","score_opus":0.01914372398383035,"score_gpt":0.2666826400378011,"score_spread":0.24753891605397077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793502496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103602916,0.029335741,0.0053889216,0.13031898,0.008226011,0.00066606613,0.024927804,0.00091303117,0.6966206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23125297,0.012396361,0.014204373,0.050796337,0.0008273372,0.0004843617,0.0087322695,0.0003352616,0.6809708],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98941725,0.00096520263,0.00082778436,0.0009385698,0.0045564496,0.003294723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981931,0.003980518,0.0013538561,0.001259468,0.010448254,0.0010268827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072473674,0.0007007893,0.0005391555,0.005463825,0.011295314,0.010096643,0.0038179276,0.004876361,0.007559341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021140734,0.001569927,0.00079098076,0.007951399,0.007209781,0.003824756,0.0030719696,0.008360209,0.0012361228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010485251,0.00007573447,0.008360611,0.00025971237,0.00004060793,0.0004994185,0.010826148,0.0009384923,0.00065333326,0.29748145,0.62299037,0.057769205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002158885,0.000017093063,0.05717638,0.0006330559,0.000056592602,0.00011541269,0.0036515333,0.0002969621,0.0006004317,0.0031417436,0.9341621,0.00012712186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9888159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13553871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13553871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23227236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9834068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793588651","doi":"","title":"Acts of the General Assembly of Newfoundland.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.022497712769581783,"score_gpt":0.26893297475418476,"score_spread":0.24643526198460297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793588651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007508099,0.016598407,0.0004413653,0.02750628,0.0030518137,0.00013592797,0.03350462,0.00032118216,0.9109323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0139453,0.0021966505,0.00035302475,0.002546183,0.000099449935,0.00004080008,0.0027322117,0.000072793475,0.97801363],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986803,0.00009855326,0.000067363166,0.00016622595,0.00053737767,0.00045012086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789715,0.00022657997,0.00011637084,0.00018745933,0.0013430226,0.00022939495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088289316,0.0006447555,0.00036558686,0.0015367959,0.0059332764,0.0032051788,0.0011295936,0.0019000489,0.060700364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037219843,0.00079413044,0.00029928688,0.0026875534,0.0012228651,0.0013691534,0.0012270012,0.0029607026,0.01092481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023015053,0.000011363589,0.0010131304,0.000057558846,0.00000525756,0.00006072768,0.00029329475,0.000064354805,0.000095597745,0.011457954,0.9715981,0.015319698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029155226,0.0000027330718,0.010152683,0.000081560574,0.0000044328717,0.000019115076,0.00041036174,0.000027112146,0.00010000017,0.00025223946,0.9889352,0.000011576799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9770348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99227166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060700364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03186616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03980699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2312063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793623321","doi":"","title":"The Canadian constitution, 1980: explanation of a proposed resolution respecting the Constitution of Canada = La [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Resolution (logic); Law; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.017841942382357062,"score_gpt":0.2449124058181146,"score_spread":0.22707046343575754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793623321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011424361,0.01929743,0.002638297,0.12668687,0.003000257,0.00020649048,0.0030093037,0.00011103772,0.83362585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3596643,0.014436848,0.006262866,0.07390321,0.0008923303,0.00037640196,0.0013712918,0.00015142649,0.54294133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997198,0.00026764028,0.000064085965,0.0002455476,0.001154196,0.001070556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984785,0.0002767186,0.00006802799,0.00004822858,0.0009814645,0.00014699301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018916558,0.0009388183,0.0004049512,0.0032479262,0.014342255,0.0067959637,0.0036292921,0.008688479,0.009633529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058754287,0.00054172677,0.0006048056,0.0051650647,0.012899205,0.0023110644,0.0016743443,0.0062761414,0.0011757369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068271547,0.000005007798,0.00018158158,0.000024361445,0.0000023367045,0.000091983595,0.0022014158,0.00019221792,0.000048199658,0.8637848,0.13096161,0.0024996558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000382192,0.000006549793,0.0031711992,0.00030966516,0.000020963036,0.0000920925,0.0035422237,0.0004732568,0.00020085218,0.08142273,0.9106546,0.00006760294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98960495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99441755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1315787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1315787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1836858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9546747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793653231","doi":"","title":"Dr. Henry Morgentaler, Dr. Leslie Smoling, Dr. Robert Scott v. Her Majesty the Queen and the Attorney General of Canada: coram: The [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Law; Art; Political science; Biology; Zoology","score_opus":0.01680659888338371,"score_gpt":0.24361894600172596,"score_spread":0.22681234711834225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793653231","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012899357,0.05716954,0.0010118304,0.73401207,0.020205501,0.000088048924,0.0009911458,0.0005945653,0.18463731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010906628,0.030350897,0.00073866267,0.10843328,0.0043237493,0.00004989905,0.00043775776,0.0003380972,0.84442097],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986732,0.00017734183,0.000038646955,0.00017723684,0.0007344428,0.0001991369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924148,0.0008213949,0.0002646015,0.0001314203,0.0039742966,0.0023934029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018444705,0.0005356442,0.00046128125,0.0013170105,0.005659683,0.0027383415,0.0009767574,0.0031911721,0.12692334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012221635,0.00045307944,0.00027116056,0.0010361642,0.0012609899,0.002214469,0.0013228032,0.0061950386,0.055659253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000425682,0.0000022211666,0.00017499301,0.00001780493,6.376446e-7,0.0000326128,0.000081153084,0.0000052441187,0.000020397281,0.0005404969,0.98906916,0.010051046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027446627,0.0000050906838,0.0009101869,0.00008831472,0.000002138145,0.0003735476,0.00057897664,0.000017592605,0.000053047057,0.0003430477,0.99761546,0.000009961772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21891806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39200267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7810819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068707145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01285021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4352876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793790820","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Constitution 1980: proposed resolution respecting the Constitution of Canada = La Constitution canadienne: projet [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.017527808115029107,"score_gpt":0.24026990508618234,"score_spread":0.22274209697115324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793790820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0123694595,0.024905719,0.0021292109,0.09729602,0.0058918097,0.0007907534,0.008112577,0.00034340328,0.84816104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13034566,0.014254244,0.009426477,0.0605766,0.0008824075,0.0007441396,0.0037177452,0.00026605936,0.77978665],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927327,0.00043868128,0.00021933636,0.00043499732,0.0037818009,0.0023925973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953752,0.0005146097,0.00014258048,0.000171179,0.003199895,0.0005965545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004793752,0.0011535386,0.00071335945,0.0045629833,0.015951958,0.009356142,0.00419154,0.0116479155,0.012786407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013044393,0.00085269747,0.0010222913,0.0064422823,0.007550242,0.0025567524,0.00267368,0.008505277,0.0023181238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023256747,0.000025010215,0.0007556595,0.000105822335,0.00001003662,0.00018225929,0.0024275181,0.00044587036,0.0002486807,0.4280613,0.5554965,0.012218134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025278463,0.000006991295,0.004488967,0.0002373744,0.000022515958,0.000043690594,0.0011698584,0.00012754602,0.00023633784,0.008902513,0.98467594,0.00006301215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99299204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84129095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15870905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4205833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9757783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793791833","doi":"","title":"Indigenous difference and the Constitution of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Constitution; Political science; Geography; Socioeconomics; Ethnology; Sociology; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.012068612195263,"score_gpt":0.2203253538642565,"score_spread":0.2082567416689935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793791833","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020200364,0.022442795,0.00071468146,0.043494232,0.00078128587,0.000058190995,0.00056004315,0.000055674973,0.91169274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6050474,0.013926287,0.0016035093,0.0130032,0.00036159306,0.000072573,0.0002588829,0.000095935786,0.36563057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973571,0.000227028,0.000052361498,0.00021565848,0.00086766604,0.0012802654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854624,0.00028361738,0.000058340513,0.00008554785,0.0007027857,0.00032351442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012501593,0.0003375877,0.0004193006,0.0016897845,0.022700772,0.010177191,0.0015061701,0.0029706934,0.012892503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003674261,0.00037434392,0.0002708792,0.0036863764,0.01393448,0.002291932,0.0019118348,0.004227272,0.0005214712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011022896,0.000008793098,0.00058757054,0.000039755098,0.000004922124,0.00007884987,0.0063730357,0.00014050199,0.000056960016,0.940018,0.043065123,0.009615457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015345127,0.000008252835,0.007669331,0.00031989664,0.00002290031,0.000077340235,0.010917296,0.00021099583,0.00016370462,0.08249323,0.8980461,0.000055639604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99756396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09797232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09797232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21251276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71084225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793840825","doi":"","title":"The provincial statutes of Lower-Canada : enacted by the King's Most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Statute; Advice (programming); Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.007383762400562832,"score_gpt":0.2113961434667358,"score_spread":0.20401238106617298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793840825","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010541643,0.011976382,0.0026682173,0.11208613,0.005634176,0.00031923281,0.016035497,0.0007810773,0.8399576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08053658,0.004465303,0.0050860583,0.01887382,0.00036555502,0.00013768273,0.0029472308,0.00030438046,0.8872833],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967361,0.00012268062,0.000089668974,0.00015132254,0.0020769276,0.0008231958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99521613,0.00030378505,0.00011413003,0.00015327835,0.0036974184,0.0005152483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014987526,0.0004931465,0.00042709245,0.0016398693,0.012576958,0.006970876,0.001809068,0.003000308,0.024691591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073517747,0.00052433414,0.00039186073,0.0038226873,0.0030956916,0.0014659236,0.0011551837,0.0045874226,0.0043125437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015241344,0.000010561217,0.0009403031,0.00005367993,0.0000034969712,0.00005664132,0.0020765257,0.00012039298,0.00018212828,0.13124986,0.84901977,0.016271336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055517526,0.0000024053365,0.0037012235,0.00008405973,0.0000047091867,0.00002305865,0.0011138016,0.00012453293,0.00016624395,0.0024813153,0.9922707,0.000022456441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09752397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09752397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30141434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70758927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793890309","doi":"","title":"Legal position of Canadian Indians: current problems in constitutional law: seminar 1964-65, University of British Columbia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Position (finance); Political science; Constitutional law; Economics","score_opus":0.013354600305893818,"score_gpt":0.21745923334400702,"score_spread":0.20410463303811321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793890309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26179916,0.036716476,0.00028810417,0.24544045,0.0022252193,0.00017635169,0.0023973207,0.00011121258,0.45084578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6920013,0.020904962,0.00054505735,0.010157131,0.0004410756,0.00006575785,0.00058851123,0.000073685056,0.2752225],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971917,0.00019783125,0.00005729825,0.00021443926,0.00082768494,0.0015110244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99632627,0.0005002294,0.000110327426,0.00006965261,0.0020584082,0.0009350477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029967984,0.00044321525,0.0005542366,0.003303763,0.041387916,0.008894436,0.0026239792,0.00303349,0.012522948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056044105,0.00058341277,0.00036609345,0.008892835,0.00621017,0.002088667,0.0025512218,0.004808963,0.000621983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020131272,0.00027356696,0.021209173,0.00039633963,0.000034947327,0.00046209773,0.112989604,0.00045175265,0.0010793539,0.13785261,0.5943704,0.13067886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035203608,0.000031690004,0.0935517,0.00047393577,0.00007400795,0.0001045634,0.145734,0.0002518288,0.0007091861,0.0037413507,0.7551408,0.00015176975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9977558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16262604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16262604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2726506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9712351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793993110","doi":"10.11575/prism/34331","title":"Wildlife and the Canadian Constitution","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Wildlife; Geography; Political science; Law; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.04146838654957441,"score_gpt":0.32251278009071227,"score_spread":0.28104439354113786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793993110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012727679,0.011340145,0.001139154,0.039610054,0.000570626,0.00004031044,0.0005309006,0.00004573695,0.9339954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72921526,0.018200452,0.0026948485,0.018929144,0.00044676103,0.00009230582,0.0005442656,0.000103250706,0.22977367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99486625,0.00054565625,0.00010448443,0.0005368633,0.0023739238,0.0015727083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99630487,0.0009379043,0.0002134595,0.00024410618,0.0018266597,0.00047298794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002587289,0.0003061663,0.00034697697,0.0034133901,0.020333827,0.009885627,0.0015000892,0.0022079968,0.018694846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007691475,0.00033745862,0.0003182285,0.0052178013,0.018592361,0.0030199857,0.0032033175,0.0024931119,0.0007413056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039503393,0.0000025491568,0.00068111916,0.000028466866,0.0000029364915,0.00006027689,0.0029124783,0.000086646294,0.00004655128,0.9631018,0.02392129,0.0091518955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009866009,0.00000599178,0.008129789,0.00028202208,0.000014978131,0.00006593716,0.00417298,0.00015490083,0.00007804049,0.062000547,0.9250497,0.00003519228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9854199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09987338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09987338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14043513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7246355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794133338","doi":"","title":"Constitutional law of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.01665031955606958,"score_gpt":0.2386969532323604,"score_spread":0.22204663367629082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794133338","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055818204,0.012388151,0.00058308,0.038547084,0.0010699602,0.00009781212,0.0027527702,0.00012703492,0.9388523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14586581,0.009361591,0.0016107507,0.017076802,0.00049790496,0.00019906198,0.0011993605,0.0001740809,0.8240146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949254,0.0003422808,0.00012411967,0.00055466814,0.002421406,0.0016321106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99677616,0.00042221366,0.00006693799,0.00020488395,0.0020349447,0.00049486046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019117612,0.0007729944,0.0007677133,0.003315683,0.023218002,0.014642194,0.0025648007,0.00535565,0.034009207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007929557,0.00090839533,0.0006085525,0.005306562,0.006586773,0.0026810851,0.002162922,0.0059625832,0.0027099976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010123529,0.000015854806,0.0004259473,0.00004219127,0.0000067086366,0.00004663076,0.00085387274,0.00018772835,0.00005030124,0.75259864,0.2371689,0.008593052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012361407,0.000005243742,0.0018964628,0.00017111005,0.000014900014,0.00002703221,0.0009789238,0.00019790781,0.00008366026,0.03316841,0.963408,0.000035916968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99446833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8669156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1330844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29677656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9655994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794172358","doi":"","title":"Halsbury's laws of Canada. Cumulative supplement.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02049095158221385,"score_gpt":0.26339824491040964,"score_spread":0.2429072933281958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794172358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001561098,0.076987155,0.0003528859,0.024376642,0.008313206,0.0001326879,0.033096176,0.0004265156,0.8547537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010515427,0.02481333,0.00041055624,0.0033279327,0.00071938214,0.000041650626,0.007495665,0.00015063732,0.9525255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855953,0.000035449688,0.000039675688,0.000076988625,0.0009873122,0.0003010868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99654084,0.00015714999,0.00006334397,0.000072082425,0.0029045646,0.00026200694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005754168,0.0010893433,0.0007428476,0.0061229724,0.0062208883,0.0051495903,0.0019549932,0.0022471927,0.12905681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032613336,0.00072385697,0.0005493213,0.009488622,0.0015315564,0.0017984409,0.0010942275,0.002190758,0.02579008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032140597,0.0000049145688,0.000100307654,0.000050991002,0.0000010590579,0.000015832593,0.00008874841,0.000028871225,0.000017174632,0.0042875144,0.98415124,0.0112501895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013901004,0.0000011495172,0.0014672847,0.00010379587,0.0000027861688,0.000014668845,0.00018044925,0.000018472469,0.000029402912,0.0005155755,0.9976586,0.000006578539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9895236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99578935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94325626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056743722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10305299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43173802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794311322","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal law in Canada, 1998: a national conference of crucial importance to all first nations persons & advisors","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.024396256294623633,"score_gpt":0.2747568291469433,"score_spread":0.2503605728523197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794311322","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058023028,0.09179393,0.0005585027,0.60249084,0.011796057,0.00047306254,0.002531326,0.00021531028,0.23211786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14792988,0.053462066,0.0024246937,0.057053916,0.0014661006,0.0002835895,0.001038226,0.00015106061,0.73619044],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706763,0.0001558542,0.00007508673,0.00014719,0.0012944621,0.0012597432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942905,0.0004723167,0.00014415098,0.000060379836,0.002467452,0.002565317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032284707,0.00056848,0.0005715752,0.001522992,0.030252818,0.008428885,0.0031797527,0.0063295187,0.011526982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005520567,0.0008305902,0.00040537413,0.0034858752,0.0041140104,0.0019616773,0.0025491673,0.0076068337,0.0010989745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002514642,0.00007566071,0.003777819,0.0002183804,0.000009367086,0.0003625015,0.017841784,0.000108767876,0.00022925345,0.009085332,0.92794514,0.040321033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001240054,0.0000102531885,0.018715862,0.0003447628,0.000012888852,0.000093351584,0.03577932,0.00006826245,0.00013438002,0.0004985439,0.94430214,0.000027867894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99582833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99873227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11242497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11242497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.46743557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81570405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795055472","doi":"10.5072/prism/29666","title":"\"A Union Not for Harmony but for Strength\": The General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Synod; Harmony (color); Theology; Art; Philosophy; Visual arts","score_opus":0.04628017641813037,"score_gpt":0.28080271698805287,"score_spread":0.2345225405699225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795055472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072115615,0.015992582,0.0020745723,0.086721584,0.001414322,0.000091089074,0.00024594122,0.00007170736,0.8212727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.779551,0.0036191253,0.0011540854,0.009037125,0.00011184968,0.00004700511,0.00004943124,0.00013772369,0.20629264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977775,0.00050492876,0.000027365262,0.00020965403,0.0005119293,0.0009686181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988813,0.00021506948,0.000042892152,0.00004218326,0.00041418738,0.00040446236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014915422,0.00039847495,0.00042007476,0.0010586804,0.038098406,0.011540724,0.0017435016,0.0031510408,0.00789879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028813411,0.00045655368,0.00022594245,0.0022731782,0.024655502,0.0032322954,0.0029525764,0.007145102,0.000526169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016549442,0.0000117468,0.0011761149,0.00004420611,0.000005660286,0.00013457393,0.07976796,0.00008655391,0.00010537745,0.8367075,0.06630079,0.015643002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018407918,0.000012540557,0.004883503,0.00036252956,0.00002069332,0.00021817902,0.12236402,0.0002926686,0.0002514616,0.049971383,0.82153046,0.00007423359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9894984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076317735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.076317735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15862559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55372655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W279526760","doi":"","title":"Prelude: Law and Community","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liturgy; Canon law; Bishops; Spirituality; Sociology; Theology; Law; Conversation; Gospel; Negotiation; Religious studies; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.08337031426653295,"score_gpt":0.369386150522983,"score_spread":0.28601583625645005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W279526760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012639317,0.007737877,0.0018739427,0.077243,0.00090260356,0.000044139342,0.00003510427,0.00004936569,0.8994746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74045396,0.0041312315,0.00076636014,0.02839945,0.001015121,0.00011636249,0.000071486145,0.00011069544,0.2249353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99317473,0.0030701049,0.00014891056,0.0008848202,0.0012049379,0.0015164539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964588,0.00092680677,0.00028196897,0.00042591617,0.0007172949,0.0011892096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046465606,0.0003181903,0.00042543781,0.0014644238,0.029110864,0.017022666,0.0016698765,0.005557868,0.016522892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008613459,0.00025773866,0.00028022274,0.0011061698,0.054474045,0.012660567,0.013591851,0.010531635,0.0024684737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042684023,0.00001565369,0.00019056571,0.000012399252,0.0000011118482,0.00009925709,0.015897447,0.000017927438,0.000024808216,0.9639183,0.015299109,0.004519125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011407764,0.000023830098,0.00049411954,0.00033455965,0.0000031788013,0.00017369873,0.038371578,0.00008664276,0.00009506267,0.24376786,0.71662503,0.000012883665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038115192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042492896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038115192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011575889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014389421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08398938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795275471","doi":"","title":"Acts of the Honourable Commission of Government of Newfoundland.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Business; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018328408770149622,"score_gpt":0.24385841106010853,"score_spread":0.2255300022899589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795275471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008550865,0.016957574,0.00047621145,0.09639137,0.006203578,0.00013525845,0.010944375,0.0003690473,0.8599717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014736964,0.001619165,0.00025318147,0.006143058,0.0001177585,0.000029345161,0.00075619074,0.00005556924,0.9762888],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788696,0.00013546844,0.000062754574,0.00019989401,0.0009241278,0.000790727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99566096,0.00047497125,0.00016991231,0.0002597796,0.002883778,0.00055060856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011355397,0.0005664369,0.00039344147,0.001372736,0.008700878,0.0047513084,0.0011837144,0.0031503157,0.04722677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005626398,0.0006307759,0.00033290152,0.0018362008,0.0014108999,0.0018991061,0.0015551264,0.004257515,0.008631491],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002090901,0.000009936805,0.0007941348,0.00003633152,0.000005210739,0.00009079048,0.00032761623,0.000037860464,0.00007817036,0.011784993,0.97625136,0.010562671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030466758,0.000002690955,0.0053217974,0.000062163424,0.0000050544554,0.000026677015,0.0005260408,0.000034765293,0.00010969394,0.00026858094,0.99362755,0.000012027289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9739648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04722677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045075055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06200077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32704395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795306509","doi":"","title":"The consolidated statutes for Upper Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.01685241843464094,"score_gpt":0.2559071244284409,"score_spread":0.23905470599379994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795306509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043893144,0.018313877,0.0013977031,0.03184777,0.003344095,0.00026499483,0.046738196,0.0006209875,0.8930831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033175044,0.0068961633,0.0026509566,0.00977441,0.00027188318,0.00015163915,0.009144505,0.00027531353,0.9376601],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949421,0.0001273469,0.00011262305,0.00027556138,0.0033192497,0.0012230475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948053,0.00024867698,0.00009285841,0.00017429993,0.004111635,0.00056725065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014743832,0.0008316926,0.0005963922,0.0038213094,0.01072204,0.008351698,0.002566265,0.003435899,0.05843923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00607057,0.00095848535,0.0006492736,0.008214334,0.0024893142,0.0020818154,0.0017332548,0.0051540313,0.010061602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012163217,0.000017954228,0.00070984813,0.00005341623,0.000004172363,0.00003498948,0.0003034615,0.000113918,0.000067882465,0.07552476,0.9037339,0.019423459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005245814,0.0000025582322,0.0042327843,0.00010906789,0.0000069938014,0.000017681827,0.00039837303,0.00009177346,0.00010727082,0.0022658708,0.9927376,0.000024805822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9961028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99811965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10225611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10225611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28706357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74192345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795335924","doi":"","title":"Canada. Constitutional Conference","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.01964436155194455,"score_gpt":0.24002852486757678,"score_spread":0.22038416331563224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795335924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006820361,0.0016171077,0.0001351816,0.013430345,0.0030873977,0.00015019884,0.009538006,0.000497097,0.9708627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003378699,0.0004789024,0.00012043711,0.0037066087,0.00023774,0.000065781074,0.001459447,0.000173336,0.990379],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668115,0.00012378866,0.00007490597,0.00035006367,0.0017332897,0.0010368444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968239,0.00030038238,0.00006986154,0.0003040867,0.001759777,0.0007419788],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017264631,0.0010296465,0.0011183241,0.0038420893,0.017303655,0.012287572,0.0029650496,0.0072319387,0.54770064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047694584,0.0012562805,0.00104645,0.004945793,0.0025311883,0.002097639,0.002502832,0.007361842,0.19120724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001486889,0.000021975191,0.00013406438,0.00003327976,0.0000026160337,0.000030408504,0.000038259463,0.000048417474,0.000042320982,0.01207099,0.97894466,0.0086182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010985511,0.0000022824122,0.0008088213,0.000040069714,0.0000025528432,0.000006076046,0.00007904562,0.00003429437,0.000046743153,0.0011254653,0.99783343,0.000010085795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9025378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9532257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95555806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04444194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.098264955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6451501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795340831","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Constitution 1981","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.021334580804859494,"score_gpt":0.2577784316541927,"score_spread":0.23644385084933317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795340831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015721736,0.010252447,0.00023832092,0.016453633,0.00107277,0.00006764685,0.0017391018,0.0000564281,0.9685476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03035271,0.004113103,0.0003909301,0.005542848,0.00018498329,0.000088481276,0.00051553344,0.000078308774,0.95873314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962811,0.00029713116,0.0001043948,0.00046154496,0.0016899375,0.0011659523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979103,0.00024198934,0.00004452625,0.00019936373,0.0013800458,0.00022379374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018202887,0.0010261099,0.00076263904,0.003328187,0.020926397,0.010910156,0.0018561807,0.0054838033,0.06841139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007420442,0.0010149296,0.0006331619,0.005854011,0.007022527,0.003687096,0.0024928914,0.0068864613,0.009676378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012724452,0.000014446249,0.00028047964,0.00004072341,0.0000035185765,0.000043146552,0.0011998272,0.00009006821,0.00003759833,0.51104486,0.47248757,0.014745011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036633528,0.0000019473646,0.0008736153,0.00008459327,0.0000043107216,0.000011607434,0.00050379615,0.000020057549,0.00003361561,0.009323692,0.98912585,0.000013136273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98535234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9933956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11285493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11285493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17157306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81882364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795694203","doi":"10.1017/cls.2017.31","title":"Perspective féministe sur l’article 1974.1 du Code civil du Québec. Une protection efficace dans la vie des femmes locataires victimes de violences?","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020052533324494432,"score_gpt":0.2655291746062412,"score_spread":0.24547664128174676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795694203","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08699818,0.055346727,0.0024859025,0.44864184,0.003605297,0.000094988056,0.0010559026,0.000054545126,0.4017166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66657436,0.02028025,0.0014028513,0.059225384,0.0010008406,0.00013830917,0.00023944402,0.000072719056,0.25106585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99592954,0.0015167879,0.00005358748,0.00030136964,0.0011207123,0.0010779471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955016,0.0019379559,0.00028658204,0.000109829794,0.0016537475,0.00051031244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032241405,0.00045614783,0.00036636475,0.0015498741,0.012266688,0.0052965917,0.0010549186,0.0051829745,0.013922076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059132827,0.0002639269,0.00030589406,0.0021378684,0.012928021,0.0022957418,0.0015939774,0.0045544747,0.0006985412],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106948966,0.00006108111,0.009492755,0.00039327465,0.000021932461,0.00092091947,0.1138896,0.00063441717,0.00084639876,0.6157991,0.19983329,0.058000218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000897209,0.000041684776,0.021490453,0.00082980405,0.000017062723,0.00009612781,0.04810867,0.00021696044,0.00043500584,0.009474427,0.91920924,0.000071504415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9640916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98154896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.064412124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4563228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796168702","doi":"10.29173/alr1332","title":"In a Poor State: The Long Road to Human Rights Protection on the Basis of Social Condition","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Human rights; Poverty; Denial; Prejudice (legal term); Social rights; State (computer science); Legislation; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; Social protection; Law; Social security; Economics; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.03949446910300471,"score_gpt":0.34214856818675843,"score_spread":0.30265409908375374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796168702","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057949208,0.029641336,0.0023436642,0.40866178,0.00091231253,0.000060471244,0.0001410955,0.00003279012,0.5002574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87466633,0.021635044,0.0010987435,0.05114377,0.0004350018,0.000034001427,0.00006056232,0.000022524851,0.050904155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99522936,0.0008526227,0.000075903765,0.00022086546,0.0014846864,0.0021366084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971384,0.00086927286,0.00019191694,0.00013963546,0.0010909864,0.0005698059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027974586,0.00017213375,0.00037536092,0.0011287406,0.0139815025,0.006065186,0.00092190783,0.0033019686,0.0040155933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059129912,0.00019744766,0.00029948525,0.0013344567,0.023385229,0.0028893256,0.003455564,0.0052607777,0.0001811581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012408738,0.000017433978,0.0026101684,0.00010692539,0.000011190236,0.00020996277,0.009004248,0.00023849691,0.00013472943,0.92443967,0.026342914,0.036871973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028591248,0.000051197847,0.031212298,0.0011990836,0.000059230922,0.0002393699,0.026645493,0.00031385644,0.00031045146,0.18443461,0.7554368,0.00006897891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94162834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9698757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058371663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037705716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1071263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27357543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796638899","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1301","title":"Issue 1: Caring Society v Canada: Neoliberalism, Social Reproduction, and Indigenous Child Welfare","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Neoliberalism (international relations); Reproduction; Welfare; Social reproduction; Politics; Political science; Tribunal; Social Welfare; Social work; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Child care; Political economy; Economic growth; Social science; Law; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.019510292626329025,"score_gpt":0.30204294208430077,"score_spread":0.28253264945797174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796638899","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029840058,0.022721276,0.00044881905,0.5988794,0.005325397,0.000101676735,0.00048664515,0.00004493662,0.34215182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45909038,0.0178757,0.0009396696,0.34857538,0.0034373736,0.00014186077,0.00027494185,0.00013881663,0.1695257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99219865,0.0006263279,0.00014410171,0.00062563294,0.0035146934,0.0028907093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99428505,0.0022654554,0.0003400504,0.00019586539,0.0017123409,0.0012012337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003899745,0.0003936058,0.0005776825,0.0013721975,0.038650308,0.015529026,0.003414273,0.013683845,0.011813727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0083789155,0.00035985568,0.0004836429,0.002798238,0.031220121,0.004234156,0.0050576967,0.014896522,0.00048724757],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013357748,0.00003982179,0.0017838718,0.0001462182,0.0000096499325,0.0003127695,0.023359945,0.000073353425,0.00013922213,0.7651558,0.19602571,0.012940166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021750464,0.000011925718,0.009287564,0.0006859665,0.000024936648,0.00019027578,0.029800596,0.000116890595,0.0002703766,0.03756689,0.9219381,0.00008481117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.978079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9866823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08955275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08955275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23755752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64975375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W279723183","doi":"","title":"An Acculturated Anglicanism: The Twenty-Three Churches of Trafalgar Region, Diocese of Niagara, Province of Ontario","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican and Episcopal history","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Census; Population; Privilege (computing); Gospel; History; Annals; Constitution; Refugee; Immigration; Law; Economic history; Geography; Genealogy; Political science; Sociology; Ancient history; Demography; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03509478075857134,"score_gpt":0.26261850157090355,"score_spread":0.22752372081233221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W279723183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8968864,0.006967194,0.00022376601,0.016825872,0.0006234834,0.00009385815,0.00048115285,0.000033199667,0.07786513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89224327,0.0026326634,0.00025988533,0.0021322998,0.000081859565,0.000029272589,0.00012178177,0.000043779222,0.10245518],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995778,0.00006669655,0.000007752383,0.000046297533,0.00009236131,0.0002090539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991636,0.000043752283,0.00005181422,0.000019622,0.00012910616,0.00059209793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037220737,0.00023995325,0.00015624076,0.0004624455,0.024913011,0.0034055081,0.0005596586,0.00060207775,0.0055397414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005637653,0.00033988958,0.00009490412,0.00076034956,0.005270911,0.0006319676,0.0019907146,0.0009998069,0.0003942126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017002641,0.000072364935,0.0776606,0.0003231224,0.000025545622,0.0029445568,0.78503484,0.00007437941,0.0042643817,0.012201516,0.078016296,0.03921232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009297384,0.000039019636,0.13447534,0.00016720848,0.000014748308,0.0005530395,0.42472887,0.000028933564,0.00023327526,0.00026130787,0.4394567,0.00003226578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9169986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9927141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083001375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021754915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023146017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16698033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799374374","doi":"","title":"Creating an Indigenous Legal Community","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science","score_opus":0.044922907553408886,"score_gpt":0.3313954430756347,"score_spread":0.2864725355222258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799374374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.094749495,0.004915571,0.015799815,0.16104688,0.004701171,0.0003627139,0.000047142446,0.00033264665,0.7180446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6975451,0.0025283676,0.01746608,0.026940849,0.0006812538,0.00023675228,0.00008142257,0.0002562267,0.25426385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929684,0.0020770617,0.000107978274,0.0007016668,0.0017654763,0.002379411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99345934,0.0007913408,0.0002303893,0.0003233126,0.0011201396,0.004075465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009327437,0.00046838165,0.00042212522,0.0019738532,0.0649006,0.013071942,0.0032554052,0.0035671992,0.01648274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006036102,0.00042994373,0.00058960146,0.0008127642,0.022882909,0.010838573,0.030123476,0.00780408,0.0015604411],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000095037885,0.000091276095,0.0014594381,0.0000794614,0.0000087878325,0.0011684438,0.3391875,0.00009968128,0.00090050336,0.58302283,0.037269842,0.03670279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044549643,0.000022160742,0.00078685355,0.00011508146,0.000007634002,0.0002847946,0.1347585,0.00014642993,0.00021940623,0.025677528,0.83795214,0.00002512413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22179992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42094022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22179992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015965099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056047015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4410178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799684005","doi":"","title":"CRA - Charitable organizations outside Canada that have received a gift from Her Majesty in right of Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02929591409849843,"score_gpt":0.23794858105657296,"score_spread":0.20865266695807452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799684005","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029687814,0.0017286342,0.0005403914,0.0125591885,0.0003893179,0.00033741162,0.11054882,0.00056733785,0.84364104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12766539,0.001558256,0.00064675784,0.0028044172,0.00007001604,0.0000931432,0.017800473,0.00012227807,0.8492393],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989889,0.000045151966,0.000031961157,0.000045394787,0.0004892739,0.00039933642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99252045,0.0011659684,0.00036836212,0.00020840844,0.004177702,0.001559194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058706076,0.00025981138,0.00026415195,0.0026838174,0.006108119,0.0026630114,0.0006339034,0.0010018852,0.16257276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004696604,0.0002977855,0.00012410305,0.0042871675,0.0004141408,0.0013610058,0.0009951356,0.0009741706,0.016021838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058265727,0.000081408296,0.008532647,0.00014994154,0.000003921598,0.00014730795,0.0017566669,0.00007200198,0.00018513862,0.0077373143,0.93665016,0.04462523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011954269,0.000015821315,0.028140543,0.00020801519,0.0000052531786,0.0000711933,0.0045312666,0.00014181792,0.00041263516,0.0004118353,0.96602017,0.000029509016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9415111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98606896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16257276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01742841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04146941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5438601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799706380","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0040","title":"Social and Economic Rights","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Social rights; Vision; Cultural rights; Political science; Human rights; Fundamental rights; Legislature; International human rights law; Law; Supreme court; Sociology","score_opus":0.04999704133581945,"score_gpt":0.2701698302668932,"score_spread":0.22017278893107373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799706380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022076413,0.007472479,0.00062307843,0.0106171565,0.00032632888,0.000021989976,0.00015592937,0.000016987806,0.9785584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3218798,0.024176143,0.0020541707,0.009426081,0.00084536313,0.00008480628,0.00046393607,0.00009037747,0.64097935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720544,0.0003229608,0.000041920273,0.00022957657,0.001378973,0.00082103274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990878,0.00019028438,0.000035040517,0.00007301218,0.00043979564,0.00017401946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015358003,0.0005319724,0.00045830262,0.002009008,0.012032084,0.009130524,0.0009604151,0.0020609617,0.023791498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019046058,0.00014932665,0.00028220218,0.0024927834,0.019792318,0.0021204988,0.0028719108,0.0031280646,0.0018265679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013985943,0.0000035462901,0.000111171954,0.000017339677,9.588247e-7,0.000023298151,0.002567287,0.000064058106,0.000037647256,0.9610999,0.023821147,0.012252252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015475067,0.0000026502544,0.000866576,0.00026392878,0.0000023395396,0.00002834632,0.0021363092,0.00005667186,0.000046014746,0.05800914,0.9385792,0.0000073472297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8342048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87612474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8342048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041678853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07040405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33354318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801803673","doi":"10.7939/r3g737b9g","title":"Reclaiming the Language of Law: The Contemporary Articulation and Application of Cree Legal Principles in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Alberta Library","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Articulation (sociology); Law; Political science; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01752137801074675,"score_gpt":0.21347071980343132,"score_spread":0.19594934179268458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801803673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6481191,0.014309133,0.005527433,0.06791907,0.00071051286,0.00023605932,0.0003094578,0.00011691178,0.26275232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820316,0.0031385322,0.0009785774,0.0018265661,0.000019514822,0.000027711409,0.000044749697,0.00005063334,0.011882088],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98998743,0.002444082,0.00021166971,0.00085690804,0.0034821124,0.0030176786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989307,0.0044982154,0.0005962407,0.00041617957,0.003723011,0.0014594154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006783998,0.0004490675,0.00064040365,0.0025851154,0.048328742,0.013658152,0.003462665,0.0030492465,0.0040182434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018488076,0.0005454495,0.0003594538,0.005319676,0.041199077,0.0045852894,0.006428669,0.0064866776,0.00026337037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002483982,0.000022873457,0.0030613455,0.00015416845,0.000012719018,0.0012220452,0.88171387,0.0003065858,0.0004825717,0.08443478,0.0074899606,0.02107426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074292298,0.000020911653,0.0077919764,0.0004941756,0.000024914452,0.00036316767,0.76324874,0.0006881466,0.0005853618,0.006825144,0.21985048,0.00009953936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9930084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20731042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20731042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2738738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91940755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801926483","doi":"10.7202/1043663ar","title":"La voix de l’enfant dans les procédures judiciaires qui le concernent : les rapports « voix de l’enfant » dans les affaires civiles au Nouveau-Brunswick*","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de l’Université de Moncton","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.01827724577484848,"score_gpt":0.25278554163552047,"score_spread":0.23450829586067198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801926483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33203378,0.015290666,0.008290425,0.09626189,0.0013337737,0.00024412293,0.0001677381,0.00005079985,0.5463268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92002547,0.002017714,0.0018235454,0.0057746875,0.00005877962,0.00007045956,0.000030826686,0.00002641473,0.07017211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944406,0.0020182738,0.0002076923,0.00049092504,0.00066139665,0.0021811214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965749,0.0019700448,0.0003074949,0.00020134685,0.0005073929,0.00043890957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048948866,0.0003574135,0.00022895288,0.00078126445,0.015308934,0.0075136,0.0013315165,0.0039430894,0.00402935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006653326,0.00038497298,0.00028308955,0.0014124668,0.0235563,0.0026594389,0.0042769453,0.0071227164,0.0003716874],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032943568,0.000012980288,0.004718386,0.00008883429,0.0000043317154,0.0010345908,0.23748568,0.0001415241,0.001049915,0.7368452,0.0049729454,0.013612707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003076519,0.00006576028,0.025296334,0.0008361072,0.00002209763,0.0008724738,0.24069914,0.00025448945,0.0021119053,0.05393894,0.67575246,0.00011950971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79239404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9163526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20760596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037443247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051073957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41765714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801944664","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190682910.003.0007","title":"Horizontal Effect and Caboose Constitutionalism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Charter; Legislature; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Normative; Power (physics); Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.019467830486887102,"score_gpt":0.2501811205019688,"score_spread":0.23071329001508167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801944664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01256298,0.0014981049,0.008956037,0.0056968983,0.00023004723,0.000034049186,0.00005942866,0.00006199508,0.97090036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8754515,0.0014632298,0.0034980671,0.0025740468,0.00030643566,0.00019773692,0.00008994469,0.00009927147,0.11631989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721754,0.00080800994,0.00004861505,0.00049098494,0.00081720325,0.0006176492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878424,0.0005478036,0.00007418101,0.00028717684,0.00019968452,0.00010692359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024196703,0.00033478442,0.00038149624,0.0010669744,0.0057168957,0.0054195183,0.00079683895,0.0020121501,0.01585114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042366297,0.00023901729,0.00044187947,0.0012781754,0.028801061,0.0048510437,0.0045613265,0.0049562636,0.0011922556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.0319965e-7,0.0000010566026,0.00001713096,0.0000021151782,2.4526375e-7,0.000003625692,0.0002005334,0.000017910459,0.000009051976,0.9986701,0.00044345958,0.0006341262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018594064,0.000008632871,0.00024885585,0.00006793323,0.0000048851234,0.000032377236,0.0010307045,0.00028030708,0.0001752057,0.8834196,0.11470717,0.0000058416886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03210587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023552965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03210587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009292841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061316057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067424595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802155858","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190682910.003.0006","title":"Canada’s Constitution and Courts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitutionalism; Charter; Law; Constitution; Political science; Jurisdiction; Federalism; Autonomy; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Judicial independence; Original jurisdiction; Fundamental rights; Constitutional law; Human rights; Democracy; Politics; History","score_opus":0.024884347898510663,"score_gpt":0.23212871540846006,"score_spread":0.2072443675099494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802155858","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045924326,0.014382544,0.00055685756,0.02313811,0.0005689127,0.000019524725,0.00027035121,0.000035018707,0.9564363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4705292,0.020152552,0.0018570637,0.017210035,0.0006253944,0.000097220814,0.00049206684,0.00011464066,0.48892185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764156,0.00022564376,0.000032104886,0.00022081206,0.0011265008,0.00075344316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990408,0.00023462424,0.000028764547,0.00005813353,0.0004820545,0.00015554075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008931073,0.0003858511,0.00035235932,0.0019170704,0.016555537,0.009021647,0.0011346817,0.0024474442,0.0108031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002763447,0.00031623757,0.0002713235,0.0033507245,0.012794445,0.0019563204,0.0016977547,0.0036694848,0.00068421144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023411794,0.000002478818,0.00012864305,0.000019136773,0.0000021619273,0.000047196278,0.0016227135,0.00013051496,0.00003550108,0.9461686,0.045154106,0.006686688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058868977,0.0000026163139,0.001365749,0.00018047239,0.0000069462844,0.00003406193,0.001577309,0.00018345556,0.000046596448,0.088005446,0.90857476,0.000016653834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9841382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8856329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1143671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1388061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82979524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802346026","doi":"","title":"Developments in Constitutional Law: The 2005-2006 Term","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Globe; Law; Political science; Terrorism; Human rights; Constitutional law; Scope (computer science); Broadcasting (networking); Criminal code; Criminal law; Computer security","score_opus":0.015449413388668324,"score_gpt":0.29447328047537497,"score_spread":0.2790238670867066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802346026","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069932267,0.6359344,0.0023607395,0.11981298,0.013171035,0.00008143619,0.0005459672,0.00008102469,0.2210193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17271665,0.54273176,0.010816136,0.1764332,0.011825518,0.00034969213,0.0012559256,0.00012940566,0.08374174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99047637,0.0018876187,0.0010234461,0.00091605954,0.004983891,0.0007126092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97861195,0.0076809586,0.0030395936,0.0010077768,0.00842345,0.0012363434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013147546,0.00035279174,0.00054502825,0.0048453086,0.0034346892,0.011006006,0.0018374597,0.0063664108,0.0053761546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026767371,0.00040595498,0.0007166192,0.008402868,0.0050286953,0.006032633,0.002077658,0.005346861,0.0011639511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003468851,0.000053299413,0.0013294264,0.0020375033,0.00001942858,0.0004131738,0.0027062797,0.0004004412,0.0005270285,0.5094245,0.29429755,0.18875659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032964513,0.000018484374,0.0016560471,0.0017127561,0.000009892576,0.000120421915,0.00042106968,0.000033409422,0.00010044495,0.003107488,0.99280626,0.000010460487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11206935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18679067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11206935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023821497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039732028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22283411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802650726","doi":"","title":"Developments in Constitutional Law: The 1986-87 Term","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Constitutional law; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Physics","score_opus":0.014336788153378353,"score_gpt":0.2973007552557321,"score_spread":0.2829639671023537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802650726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.110327095,0.05095719,0.0033011592,0.12232629,0.00471954,0.00024026178,0.0013669588,0.000095878924,0.7066657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64557546,0.020984614,0.002836517,0.08792031,0.002193966,0.00021786008,0.0008111492,0.00011771796,0.23934242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98356885,0.001464454,0.00056349754,0.00084111275,0.008774586,0.0047874846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99292666,0.0020457571,0.0005170092,0.00024801097,0.003400887,0.00086159736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007977754,0.00046692797,0.0007117684,0.0031889372,0.01768572,0.014163062,0.0021432657,0.011020688,0.004179449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018409349,0.0007022233,0.00070575834,0.006564697,0.01738533,0.0027713506,0.003729023,0.011732907,0.00069158705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003482679,0.000038868548,0.0016418583,0.000079273006,0.000009054172,0.000307922,0.004711334,0.00064078544,0.0002693546,0.91790783,0.06462724,0.009731692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000384365,0.000038297498,0.020895911,0.0006324414,0.00003143076,0.00014455075,0.004860639,0.00037606485,0.0005545929,0.029564355,0.94277245,0.000090918875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94380426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.971091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94380426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12909116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.162433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9366263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802889441","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0110","title":"Honour in sovereignty: Can Crown consultation with Indigenous peoples erase Canada’s sovereignty deficit?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Law; Honour; Duty; Politics; Supreme court; Political science; Constitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.010372781011870804,"score_gpt":0.22271116260188928,"score_spread":0.21233838159001847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802889441","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1737029,0.010676855,0.001571156,0.47815877,0.0007493286,0.000059472062,0.0001760015,0.00006987522,0.3348357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9415052,0.003315234,0.0007122482,0.034371547,0.00011578533,0.000016540174,0.0000439638,0.00002697318,0.019892426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99418217,0.0007419338,0.00007269347,0.0003513579,0.0013507786,0.0033011588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921863,0.0021831917,0.0003454103,0.00018318092,0.0021450112,0.0029569063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003641287,0.00023168598,0.00037877692,0.0009725879,0.035620846,0.013098932,0.002370723,0.0063085454,0.008359897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0124492245,0.00027074697,0.00029760046,0.0016662999,0.018793706,0.0062718876,0.006420031,0.00761923,0.00040131345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006607327,0.00007707882,0.017382659,0.0003018604,0.00003611447,0.001855174,0.1314015,0.0005803272,0.0007658518,0.6597267,0.11885595,0.0689507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004819342,0.00004250816,0.03991026,0.0012607257,0.00011500168,0.0004894706,0.2226383,0.0014258466,0.0008845797,0.090406716,0.64256525,0.00021320506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98723257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121906236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.121906236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28332803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8844958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804237024","doi":"10.29173/alr1341","title":"The Judicial Resolution of Church Property Disputes: Canadian and American Models","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Deference; Scope (computer science); Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Law; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Resolution (logic); Settlor; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.03830581873405498,"score_gpt":0.30450888060468106,"score_spread":0.2662030618706261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804237024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051346347,0.010732098,0.0048479894,0.049359243,0.00037360445,0.00008592533,0.00012210694,0.000045461496,0.8830872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95291555,0.00900243,0.0037722208,0.005409417,0.00025078334,0.00008761914,0.00006404041,0.000022872367,0.028474998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924625,0.0015895533,0.00015171348,0.000506372,0.003467139,0.0018227412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99449724,0.0019349236,0.00029064558,0.00025539615,0.0022644063,0.00075734116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054645096,0.00043830433,0.00059889077,0.0038179038,0.017221088,0.01194641,0.0037059041,0.0054372814,0.0057692872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01213616,0.0004116181,0.000658107,0.005020087,0.021212801,0.004305091,0.0031362772,0.005136121,0.000413067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008702934,0.000011530626,0.0002931508,0.000014747218,0.000002866843,0.00004695591,0.0020094104,0.00042178924,0.000025882544,0.9903362,0.0029500236,0.0038787478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018640212,0.00006097716,0.006585144,0.00048559927,0.00013171682,0.00032348506,0.015307082,0.009896919,0.00023822123,0.5936009,0.37298915,0.00019441808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9552688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9627317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0907505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0907505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07560565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65844405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804671287","doi":"10.1017/cls.2018.5","title":"Economic Development through Treaty Reparations in New Zealand and Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Treaty of Waitangi; Treaty; Settlement (finance); Indigenous; Confiscation; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Politics; Geography; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.02233505969513448,"score_gpt":0.27765709831178303,"score_spread":0.25532203861664854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804671287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6972722,0.002969058,0.00026036115,0.010385747,0.00009550086,0.00016190522,0.0008342011,0.000022567658,0.28799853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758111,0.001734846,0.0002848855,0.00062494405,0.0000114048335,0.000044303106,0.0001729423,0.000012183923,0.021303346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960424,0.00029214672,0.00009394728,0.00021780429,0.0012548106,0.002099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99545467,0.00074148766,0.000659152,0.00014468328,0.0018558498,0.0011440855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020543642,0.00020134405,0.00034049214,0.0037021136,0.012809818,0.0065103117,0.0013264669,0.0009842189,0.008868982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006993414,0.00027089208,0.0003536012,0.006275767,0.0059274854,0.0018825373,0.0035530508,0.0023354515,0.00018580044],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028070193,0.00037883758,0.14636442,0.0004938557,0.00018084251,0.0045680436,0.15097523,0.0019878568,0.0018899692,0.5462136,0.04596801,0.1006986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054030956,0.0000646693,0.484929,0.0005727473,0.00007437778,0.00030544543,0.12578246,0.0011028703,0.0004629062,0.005601131,0.38089147,0.00015898143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9959915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1520327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1520327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13378066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9835219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W280710510","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4560","title":"Equality Kapped; Media Unleashed","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Media coverage; Humanities; Sociology; Law; Media studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08740563674334273,"score_gpt":0.39071923331713176,"score_spread":0.30331359657378903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W280710510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013717025,0.009719826,0.0037380895,0.14035681,0.0031243109,0.000032146363,0.00019642257,0.00013535234,0.82898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7488145,0.009342362,0.001643489,0.070200264,0.003899387,0.00007311041,0.00019149856,0.00021004584,0.1656254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99433714,0.0016411358,0.00012949688,0.00046346456,0.0023329111,0.0010958908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936419,0.0036130925,0.00045123772,0.0004809772,0.0010342733,0.00077857065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030625577,0.00048024798,0.00042659094,0.0028103497,0.013985414,0.021647021,0.0013607434,0.0055126376,0.02895379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011564809,0.00040589657,0.00032620027,0.002543447,0.017600521,0.016596626,0.012858717,0.009621704,0.002243994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003145485,0.000025997078,0.00078081625,0.00013812153,0.0000069003354,0.00046783523,0.020250797,0.000086367916,0.00024400263,0.8595118,0.06363051,0.054825377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007529043,0.000014464293,0.00091922015,0.00048066204,0.000012695784,0.0002137265,0.015617549,0.00010127799,0.0005787488,0.070059046,0.91197205,0.000023021434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.069467545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07478469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069467545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0114579955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010138654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13812637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807714046","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Conflict and the Development of Canadian Aboriginal Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ResearchOnline - ND (The University of Notre Dame Australia)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.14087709927964806,"score_gpt":0.39163663977465196,"score_spread":0.25075954049500393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807714046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14184406,0.00888688,0.0030021595,0.053077277,0.00029556477,0.00009640703,0.00018098933,0.00005512487,0.7925616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743198,0.0020416267,0.0012047924,0.00248078,0.00005057693,0.0000299547,0.000046938992,0.000025026464,0.019800615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863024,0.0019889786,0.00034294438,0.001257149,0.0053047366,0.0048038997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98798895,0.0036599732,0.0007055025,0.0006089929,0.005526703,0.0015098535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0103235375,0.00031690698,0.0005301496,0.0045891628,0.039115895,0.017595757,0.0032778347,0.0034174917,0.006467628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021994274,0.0006218677,0.0004211736,0.0051858174,0.05098383,0.00393922,0.0068924963,0.006892379,0.00022308005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007357304,0.0000072355765,0.0011689595,0.000020383139,0.000004602389,0.00013047218,0.02055102,0.0002923217,0.00009287577,0.96804315,0.0032255563,0.006455974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053074666,0.000028827231,0.021039002,0.000513666,0.00006565613,0.00026754933,0.048470996,0.002021789,0.00064586103,0.274853,0.65186226,0.00017841316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9907142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24925648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24925648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26416293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8707561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808418278","doi":"","title":"The Constitution of Canada: History, Evolution, Influence and Reform","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.0225631248589037,"score_gpt":0.2728567715367771,"score_spread":0.2502936466778734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808418278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24812251,0.03461203,0.0023361293,0.14043722,0.0010058323,0.0001263185,0.0016361185,0.00013753456,0.57158625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9435717,0.0062002647,0.0009516706,0.0045611933,0.00012785247,0.000026749876,0.0001693171,0.00006865067,0.044322655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954665,0.0005784368,0.00009111959,0.0004643256,0.0016346631,0.0017649118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920561,0.0018988247,0.00046474382,0.00034057186,0.0037146562,0.0015251078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00289719,0.00032803215,0.00051297643,0.004180465,0.023017364,0.01358484,0.0018762166,0.0027944178,0.010167695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0122845415,0.00036352163,0.00028103875,0.008076778,0.021098047,0.002396022,0.0027393703,0.0037831008,0.0003147301],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045244535,0.000035486097,0.00857736,0.00016164845,0.000027409658,0.00018716908,0.018335192,0.00074260565,0.0002881242,0.89791274,0.031082898,0.042604055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040761235,0.000025489077,0.0612798,0.000810093,0.00005955839,0.00011990577,0.025906505,0.00093949406,0.00056326116,0.067860514,0.8422375,0.00015715479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8175258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18247421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3332513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94821405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809141803","doi":"10.1177/0706743718784939","title":"Canada Should Retain Its Reservation on the United Nation’s Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"NOSM University; Western University; McMaster University; University of Toronto; Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre; University of Ottawa","funders":"Government of Canada; Australian Government","keywords":"Reservation; Convention; Political science; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Law","score_opus":0.08374380496929197,"score_gpt":0.2991643480561549,"score_spread":0.21542054308686293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809141803","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028066356,0.008236386,0.0017534941,0.7791595,0.02164863,0.00020103667,0.0016547418,0.00039659187,0.18414296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03428031,0.0063032378,0.008978936,0.6596974,0.0021039937,0.0002000034,0.00083666906,0.00046964627,0.28712976],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98283905,0.0012605413,0.00070824084,0.0012047846,0.0095150415,0.004472316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9734624,0.00586913,0.00057385076,0.0017049824,0.01341414,0.004975419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0084905205,0.0009471867,0.001926167,0.0015381355,0.022250762,0.012332818,0.0061923326,0.026023574,0.01894134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020861382,0.0010588892,0.0018192537,0.0028510618,0.010617426,0.004838278,0.003740721,0.028982976,0.007868993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031055595,0.000042381347,0.000511965,0.00009341532,0.000010804754,0.00014862666,0.0010759336,0.00008118766,0.00025648446,0.06871193,0.9153212,0.013715041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001678361,0.000012673973,0.0011987719,0.00021172481,0.000013038582,0.00004843109,0.00078624545,0.000100386686,0.00018736055,0.004433457,0.9929137,0.00007722552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.965958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98296505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05137657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05137657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2986477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37276483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811405627","doi":"10.21991/cf29362","title":"Wahkohtowin in Action","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Metis; Law; Commission; Work (physics); Political science; Action (physics); Sociology; Law reform; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.05231313615420984,"score_gpt":0.34114393953631045,"score_spread":0.2888308033821006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811405627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07365169,0.0010519633,0.009832794,0.027453063,0.00087154494,0.00035667032,0.00013638052,0.00029009537,0.8863558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63800216,0.00049887045,0.009685559,0.0047193654,0.00003374675,0.0002173661,0.00009073659,0.00010362552,0.34664854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732697,0.0006190497,0.0000772296,0.00052854366,0.0005832724,0.0008649243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987972,0.0002193297,0.00006803595,0.00020124388,0.0002475219,0.00046676304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028057978,0.00037077768,0.00024098015,0.0007391118,0.010756279,0.005804571,0.0012053445,0.0022109214,0.020022992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035530357,0.00024041148,0.00025830523,0.00063855207,0.008945836,0.0034236736,0.0071600727,0.0028181456,0.0018349016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042430805,0.00007257729,0.0029171,0.00011826407,0.000008979026,0.0007336635,0.07276536,0.00025253618,0.0013112373,0.8044969,0.043341927,0.07393909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009821911,0.000021080743,0.0025873133,0.00018570643,0.000011827043,0.00017712645,0.043578982,0.00036872234,0.0008421268,0.0520821,0.9000953,0.000039867267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20463721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40767425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7953628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008325615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023964822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40689224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811429659","doi":"10.7202/1045932ar","title":"LE PARTAGE DES RESPONSABILITÉS PARENTALES APRÈS UNE RUPTURE : RÔLE ET LIMITES DU DROIT","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05376253290635385,"score_gpt":0.29789843498446633,"score_spread":0.24413590207811248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811429659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12006405,0.012991434,0.014459582,0.11311991,0.0026947309,0.000110548994,0.00059020583,0.00010827884,0.73586124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6886609,0.0056289034,0.0026951453,0.0076666954,0.0005544887,0.000153842,0.00021418408,0.00010396801,0.29432186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740136,0.0008603865,0.00007132395,0.0003042536,0.00068113406,0.0006815564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964935,0.0010474325,0.00034562897,0.0002606311,0.0011227038,0.0007300342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022486795,0.0004396763,0.00033235736,0.0007844327,0.010530612,0.0052704355,0.0015636069,0.0031923053,0.012593384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060225856,0.00023013385,0.00055242656,0.00083368894,0.010714212,0.0030574342,0.0030398995,0.0042349724,0.001365045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004771519,0.000025269359,0.004855008,0.000090285735,0.000016986367,0.0009537852,0.09388536,0.00031768187,0.0005491506,0.8317482,0.042858638,0.024651937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011777801,0.000048363963,0.01530321,0.00046694727,0.000024454142,0.0009284846,0.04900484,0.00043637387,0.0006718076,0.055983145,0.87703055,0.00009001339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3551335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42426646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3551335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016801976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016386138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70613277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W283588073","doi":"10.3138/jcs.36.3.61","title":"Do Parents have Fundamental Rights?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fundamental rights; Ratification; Right to property; International human rights law; Law; Political science; Linguistic rights; Human rights; Convention; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.08452923904449697,"score_gpt":0.3621077330811215,"score_spread":0.2775784940366245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W283588073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22214842,0.010953914,0.00966367,0.27104297,0.0018423264,0.000052986663,0.00046108395,0.00004689946,0.4837876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678541,0.0042907423,0.0008834633,0.014107509,0.00037316282,0.00004026582,0.00010148595,0.000015908734,0.012333389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702954,0.0014055527,0.00008511283,0.0003528614,0.00047349,0.00065339066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99099684,0.0047753262,0.0011978014,0.00079058844,0.0010967875,0.0011426415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005665705,0.0001525804,0.00033385723,0.0005044732,0.0042542457,0.0030124164,0.0005130439,0.0023481727,0.011794761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026690163,0.00022857597,0.00019832484,0.0005922872,0.009307353,0.009410789,0.0022642962,0.0028432612,0.00086951075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024987323,0.00003073478,0.011802252,0.000054165772,0.000008788867,0.00044710445,0.035283335,0.00004026625,0.00013034452,0.9108285,0.013623542,0.027725922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004170207,0.00005687785,0.0151112415,0.00065244583,0.000028543383,0.0013674985,0.06665383,0.00013921571,0.00045565286,0.5290064,0.3864472,0.0000393108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017679367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015896982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9823206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025797433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034285984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03945744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W283933355","doi":"","title":"Timely Interventions: MacKinnon's Contribution to Canadian Equality Jurisprudence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Psychological intervention; Political science; Sociology; Law; Criminology; Psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.047347919633634696,"score_gpt":0.3881111537471724,"score_spread":0.3407632341135377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W283933355","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00447657,0.035840865,0.005379033,0.6442992,0.0060386425,0.00018244045,0.00021763537,0.00010242272,0.30346322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4549984,0.046713065,0.018334143,0.3229047,0.004172105,0.00051084266,0.00020342934,0.0003867906,0.15177655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98688626,0.0033165296,0.0003956352,0.0014799868,0.005006239,0.0029154748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850358,0.006265571,0.0003967994,0.0005746996,0.004544159,0.0031830333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013516239,0.0009880079,0.00084565795,0.0041774646,0.031176768,0.011007008,0.004248303,0.009316982,0.012526669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022684412,0.0006533512,0.00070817093,0.0029084424,0.026737157,0.0049922434,0.008366164,0.013432197,0.0007680535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002706781,0.00004072492,0.0013660598,0.00024292267,0.000019474082,0.00033254328,0.014877101,0.00028983734,0.000090727015,0.640075,0.27576777,0.066870734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002134682,0.0000118019725,0.0026843331,0.00080203876,0.000028344255,0.0001494935,0.005400236,0.00036324374,0.00013108253,0.08037721,0.9099587,0.00007224113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9694215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9883907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17160194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17160194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.302089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9608243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W285968304","doi":"","title":"Newfoundland (Treasury Board) v. N.A.P.E.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Doctrine; Treasury; Equity (law)","score_opus":0.023595942905606754,"score_gpt":0.25081334481509093,"score_spread":0.22721740190948417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W285968304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024306793,0.006552012,0.00075140607,0.059623476,0.0014843418,0.00020672184,0.0038017142,0.00021392271,0.90305966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09741299,0.0029426175,0.0011406547,0.06263797,0.00015729711,0.00013338357,0.0012360441,0.00008511024,0.83425397],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996185,0.00018147973,0.000101568745,0.00041146448,0.0012536739,0.0018668395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970482,0.00056807674,0.00012059381,0.00009927925,0.001619393,0.00054444245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016114088,0.00064946106,0.00046570422,0.0011549356,0.016600596,0.007382422,0.0016377768,0.0062739234,0.029245945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003632247,0.0011164247,0.00079694943,0.0012369025,0.0024350479,0.0020112253,0.0015150202,0.008106055,0.0038013908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008249531,0.00008214329,0.0055651236,0.00013893649,0.000040385232,0.0014538503,0.0010208264,0.00030594406,0.00094728346,0.1407485,0.8294451,0.020169402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006398633,0.000048402155,0.02947798,0.0003421137,0.0000800216,0.0002820973,0.0013752796,0.00043562314,0.0012714649,0.0033271075,0.9631246,0.00017141113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9796209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06442794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06442794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07271819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46745962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W286193075","doi":"","title":"What is Marriage-Like Like? The Irrelevance of Conjugality","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Relevance (law); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Focus (optics); Positive economics; Family law; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.028166549375670816,"score_gpt":0.30480151512857484,"score_spread":0.276634965752904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W286193075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34893116,0.014148577,0.0059238644,0.11483758,0.0008895297,0.000046728856,0.0002121122,0.000029735917,0.51498073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892691,0.0023951887,0.00034375404,0.003683858,0.00018452581,0.00001177922,0.000037611055,0.000007826861,0.004066353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973701,0.0014510602,0.00010387299,0.00027876007,0.00041644005,0.00037959413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979432,0.00070357,0.00037579096,0.00022303771,0.00030053646,0.00045380258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031460673,0.00011132458,0.00034020178,0.0011658875,0.0060167164,0.0061760647,0.00060403283,0.001351005,0.0036760825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009475785,0.00012792167,0.00018733118,0.0012261799,0.024580859,0.007035124,0.0032849154,0.0018396281,0.0003030517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013031131,0.000025204305,0.006697417,0.000043093438,0.0000075819216,0.00025906786,0.061676446,0.000037116148,0.00008875504,0.90183187,0.0039273584,0.025393074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011460751,0.00008029179,0.018922476,0.0005230512,0.000019017813,0.0014443973,0.1520591,0.00023837296,0.00023629834,0.6234316,0.20299509,0.000038812057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015721349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014319944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015721349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029230772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001721945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031259656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2876040202","doi":"10.1007/s10991-018-9212-3","title":"‘First Among Equals’: Breaking the Deadlock in Parental and Sibling Funeral Disputes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Liverpool Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Executor; Kinship; Deadlock; Statutory law; Sibling; Law; Common law; Genealogy; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.04032180553158114,"score_gpt":0.329332233732953,"score_spread":0.28901042820137185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2876040202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5860099,0.015237123,0.025587615,0.05904946,0.0005472066,0.00016689296,0.00003283874,0.00003934516,0.3133296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99345666,0.0007723703,0.0014048729,0.0017142592,0.00003530387,0.000029952545,0.000005656591,0.0000073079523,0.002573647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96078753,0.029046018,0.0012307253,0.0020685657,0.0034825166,0.0033846367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724476,0.020338004,0.0020986171,0.001584936,0.0017375182,0.0017933758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0402679,0.00018447085,0.00078070216,0.0019833748,0.014287158,0.009248139,0.003368951,0.005988973,0.0025060938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06591099,0.00047536785,0.0004326416,0.0018054104,0.05748555,0.012623411,0.012920443,0.005410114,0.00020693071],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008307823,0.000016966847,0.0013592623,0.000046213612,0.000004851626,0.00038288708,0.07316033,0.00009846192,0.000045725155,0.9130545,0.00086814683,0.01095428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048945858,0.00007230321,0.006080461,0.0010372292,0.000030067284,0.0015510225,0.29653153,0.00096858514,0.00038172383,0.5956407,0.097586356,0.000071011724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022668524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033425324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0402679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009213504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01319124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21295953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883005110","doi":"10.25071/ryr.v2i0.40379","title":"The Youth and Law Project","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue YOUR Review (York Online Undergraduate Research)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Law; Government (linguistics); Relevance (law); Political science; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Voting; Psychology; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.3430553272672741,"score_gpt":0.46716867815311297,"score_spread":0.12411335088583886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883005110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24680786,0.011800327,0.0027066737,0.049145214,0.0013168594,0.0038423538,0.10011069,0.00039789188,0.58387214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51565194,0.014851914,0.00661366,0.006119942,0.00019609275,0.008097849,0.040026005,0.00031992997,0.40812272],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971826,0.00066044164,0.00010296108,0.00029640843,0.00091201457,0.0008456092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919138,0.0009327368,0.0005110077,0.000406683,0.003136819,0.0030988923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050944914,0.00033649278,0.00056940917,0.0021487898,0.009118414,0.0050585126,0.0016469816,0.0010780282,0.04302463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009555454,0.00042308867,0.00036054224,0.003721196,0.0022703854,0.002608018,0.0055751884,0.0015519763,0.0038346907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011340953,0.00022053826,0.062433455,0.00073716627,0.000025984531,0.000383826,0.11124164,0.00006160009,0.0001553072,0.058858316,0.59350514,0.17226355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036523314,0.00002585044,0.06760432,0.0010090813,0.00002173917,0.00006011073,0.069592915,0.00006157497,0.00008281566,0.002573644,0.85891753,0.000013889365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7899126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90194124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7899126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032764282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07845998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42264932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885119136","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.2.01","title":"<i>Reference re: Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Appeal; Supreme court; Section (typography); Context (archaeology); Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Political science; High Court; Sociology; Constitutional court; Common law; Constitution; Epistemology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0358771769568436,"score_gpt":0.2644654530922324,"score_spread":0.2285882761353888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885119136","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0078446735,0.018181125,0.0005679905,0.19846225,0.006827488,0.00020562572,0.0042007095,0.00020824293,0.7635018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08995825,0.00872012,0.00072427274,0.28492385,0.0015643158,0.00024247145,0.0014420529,0.00012846773,0.6122962],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945056,0.00047841354,0.00021525346,0.0006482921,0.0023056783,0.0018467621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997593,0.00070922816,0.00014334777,0.000109386754,0.0011693373,0.00027575434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015639188,0.0011575883,0.000663458,0.002967409,0.021927588,0.0097167455,0.003957916,0.021257699,0.020759262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060204244,0.0006564626,0.00077332224,0.004914895,0.0057895053,0.003045354,0.001818793,0.009428675,0.0043636416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020415022,0.000019753095,0.0008064063,0.00012246399,0.0000104237415,0.00035633869,0.00376437,0.000110354995,0.00024769327,0.10758196,0.8810881,0.005871598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013498813,0.000018596607,0.008597448,0.00044554143,0.00002834149,0.000119195196,0.004261437,0.00010563161,0.00033190238,0.0064094393,0.97957224,0.00009657491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9742681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9892328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052032687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052032687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051682636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37752533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W288602332","doi":"","title":"We too have Common sense: The Waterloo Declaration and Full communion in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Law; Sociology; Meaning (existential); Theology; Religious studies; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.054481185504400204,"score_gpt":0.3195296113158023,"score_spread":0.2650484258114021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W288602332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10219008,0.033173885,0.0023735105,0.34088647,0.004432916,0.00017236895,0.0012740265,0.00013794318,0.51535875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7516772,0.010482255,0.0017730388,0.03592351,0.00043435884,0.00009291077,0.00041898797,0.00019147576,0.19900626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99017525,0.0010985747,0.00021782803,0.00082019734,0.003697446,0.0039907466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98876345,0.002426239,0.0005638154,0.00038111117,0.0048263944,0.0030389582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004346076,0.00042255197,0.0005356113,0.0018095098,0.050524443,0.016666219,0.0027808878,0.00498431,0.010515801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01581926,0.0006370009,0.00034439322,0.004897547,0.018158697,0.004490595,0.0064069345,0.008420634,0.00057335454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006156499,0.000025841968,0.003773475,0.00014630325,0.000022849083,0.00069664244,0.08193856,0.0005187428,0.00029901587,0.6205171,0.26170725,0.03029271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015947198,0.000009055677,0.00909518,0.00031973104,0.000016347934,0.00008541567,0.06022627,0.0003835955,0.00022807099,0.017247604,0.91221136,0.00016149195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9974656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20728198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20728198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3809267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91944057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886839932","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.2.03","title":"<i>R v Kapp</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Supreme court; Charter; Affirmative action; Law; Deference; Government (linguistics); Political science; Respondent; Disadvantaged; Equal Protection Clause; Section (typography); Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.03053588415474346,"score_gpt":0.27633408401553355,"score_spread":0.2457981998607901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886839932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006356929,0.004707475,0.0028697785,0.23943278,0.0070968177,0.00038118387,0.0015618108,0.00074773846,0.73684555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06732186,0.0016466705,0.003291534,0.6792809,0.0016684866,0.00036328135,0.00040533114,0.0001919704,0.24583001],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887627,0.0011674231,0.0005195215,0.0014612029,0.0048291166,0.003259974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99364495,0.0027021195,0.00024951893,0.00036092242,0.0024993154,0.0005430585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067825657,0.00067606574,0.00075542426,0.001047918,0.011680233,0.010602719,0.0038158535,0.023685897,0.014849476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020144887,0.0010040279,0.0012988417,0.0009859382,0.007007571,0.002877553,0.003655745,0.017165603,0.006686387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000298183,0.000016809754,0.0004299656,0.000081569364,0.000013103878,0.00034573727,0.0011857888,0.000110504785,0.00038298374,0.2900734,0.70028436,0.0070460443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021266153,0.000031089017,0.0019115233,0.00033347902,0.000035915546,0.00022509278,0.0011241675,0.0002634077,0.0008117889,0.018104373,0.97702926,0.000108615895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5616762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6656745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4383238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015738416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035774287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88181037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887193794","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.2.05","title":"<i>Alberta v Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Supreme court; Law; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); High Court; Political science; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.0246152067378612,"score_gpt":0.27130976404522505,"score_spread":0.24669455730736387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887193794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026378863,0.0040518604,0.0005612433,0.057072576,0.0018927333,0.00016022225,0.00033444734,0.00010835701,0.9094397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.282644,0.002189441,0.001103146,0.14726752,0.00029823455,0.00011724446,0.00020773953,0.00008309423,0.56608963],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971933,0.00022054494,0.00004991482,0.00024598333,0.001000561,0.0012896721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993754,0.00017214284,0.00003859245,0.000028988607,0.00022231732,0.00016260523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012998205,0.00037252423,0.00024195468,0.0006265112,0.017099649,0.0053210533,0.001974291,0.0073714023,0.010887041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024779001,0.00043250876,0.00042050064,0.0007696955,0.004804002,0.001139172,0.0019911362,0.0060939332,0.0011073289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039946517,0.000026636902,0.002818804,0.00009294064,0.000012575437,0.0016847876,0.015049342,0.000110052526,0.0010621409,0.43421665,0.5244916,0.020394433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011479969,0.000022931392,0.0070124767,0.00017237477,0.000021010499,0.00031459317,0.01040021,0.00008861541,0.00049009133,0.0047092927,0.97670525,0.000051695417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9318671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9762498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06813288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01891206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0321959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13721728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887699530","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198785521.013.35","title":"English Law and its Expansion","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; English law; Political science; Comparative law; Prerogative; Parliament; Civil law (Civil law); Scots law; Public law; Adjudication; Israeli law; Municipal law; Sources of law; Chinese law; Politics","score_opus":0.029983872416618002,"score_gpt":0.24615296012753243,"score_spread":0.21616908771091442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887699530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009427018,0.0495048,0.0005511139,0.011160058,0.00080767396,0.00001536624,0.00005292616,0.000024707679,0.92845637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3546267,0.04164201,0.0007740736,0.0057505374,0.0016791482,0.000054691765,0.00011224494,0.000068913316,0.5952917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922264,0.00022936563,0.000035440935,0.00008541196,0.00027916924,0.00014784094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992582,0.00033063104,0.000048047732,0.00007419993,0.000220607,0.00006827045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009628027,0.00023757342,0.00023212268,0.0011728717,0.00274583,0.0050563584,0.0004283301,0.00087775633,0.0106091695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001826494,0.00015607788,0.00014079943,0.0009110373,0.0054572993,0.0035652998,0.0018616599,0.0016799713,0.0014329889],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000822673,0.000021625696,0.00026845618,0.00009794583,0.0000020327582,0.00016901006,0.009858161,0.00006439268,0.00012597837,0.9100662,0.045915548,0.033402424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039448882,0.000007803598,0.0010268859,0.00019004583,0.0000018064634,0.000092435366,0.001416855,0.000053484684,0.00004864683,0.027114758,0.9700393,0.000004092868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02723944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037345994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02723944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061139804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032423923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054161787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887920692","doi":"","title":"La common law de A à Z","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Art; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.0208173487883105,"score_gpt":0.2516333608629966,"score_spread":0.2308160120746861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887920692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008951791,0.0029775216,0.01577964,0.007879259,0.0012540013,0.00006758655,0.0004467641,0.00016306396,0.9624804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4814388,0.004351628,0.010203089,0.0051094736,0.0011604491,0.00024745468,0.0006652691,0.00020573639,0.49661818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696165,0.00090838235,0.00024315195,0.00083624193,0.00070008164,0.0003503544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979073,0.0005635872,0.00019861314,0.00044406974,0.0007285299,0.00015788467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019039179,0.00048132183,0.0004555599,0.0017534314,0.0051858197,0.009721124,0.0009278145,0.0023134318,0.04075325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045474884,0.0003248289,0.0006679953,0.0015121677,0.010126405,0.0074105193,0.003972036,0.003265616,0.0100870915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005220278,0.0000022460981,0.00007485156,0.000012979779,0.0000030065003,0.000022237986,0.0006080049,0.00001889543,0.00007210971,0.9910815,0.004264761,0.0038341656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011919685,0.000023078328,0.00085009757,0.000101526726,0.00001299796,0.00016947534,0.0009803408,0.00019660815,0.00026038053,0.3799056,0.6174692,0.000018811637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014941589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009904781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04075325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037326512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004606941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13633317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887938608","doi":"","title":"Unpacking Sexual Assault: The Intersections of Violence in Canadian Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology (July 15-21, 2018)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unpacking; Sexual assault; Criminology; Sexual violence; Law; Poison control; Political science; Human factors and ergonomics; Sociology; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.034174825884515043,"score_gpt":0.3280133049602188,"score_spread":0.29383847907570376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887938608","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23694055,0.0533383,0.0039389892,0.20707338,0.0014852431,0.00017929194,0.0012299796,0.000071466646,0.49574283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9485652,0.026529077,0.0019378389,0.0071904417,0.00028437542,0.000083030296,0.0002560593,0.000053096483,0.015100873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903537,0.002085092,0.000253746,0.00064453395,0.0030542281,0.0036087355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851874,0.004623737,0.00096755143,0.00043688534,0.0063612047,0.0024232136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006387833,0.0011076392,0.0010729879,0.015276902,0.055043522,0.031314924,0.0041732616,0.005348378,0.012185641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020460315,0.0009807554,0.0008645526,0.020369666,0.04474455,0.013238199,0.01149075,0.009058513,0.0004086241],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027993794,0.00005792185,0.026514046,0.00029952056,0.000035388755,0.0003545419,0.19307204,0.0005540396,0.00016663676,0.69536203,0.02938248,0.054173283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009420752,0.000024276183,0.083875634,0.0027264361,0.00013639314,0.00032260566,0.53820056,0.0013466834,0.00020802447,0.115980245,0.2569386,0.00023106833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26184812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26184812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39259863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8561516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888727307","doi":"10.1017/s0008423918000343","title":"Imperious Temptations: Democratic Legitimacy and Indigenous Consent in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Political science; Indigenous; Democratic legitimacy; Fiduciary; Democracy; Law; Legitimacy; Veto; Jurisdiction; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.02935989210242186,"score_gpt":0.31781990845801944,"score_spread":0.2884600163555976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888727307","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15686443,0.0027400474,0.010497441,0.1340355,0.00031690983,0.0001762707,0.00021149518,0.000087893735,0.6950701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781461,0.00056101964,0.0015862944,0.0033659365,0.000036239715,0.000024930127,0.000022602364,0.000017102748,0.016239805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847698,0.00379135,0.00040937832,0.0013176373,0.0050570383,0.0046547665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9808935,0.008887298,0.0012575819,0.00123265,0.005406556,0.0023224386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011911907,0.00025216027,0.0004966498,0.0013946978,0.02473807,0.012051009,0.001930679,0.003655754,0.007749341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02856783,0.00034764726,0.00035835296,0.0020572755,0.03777235,0.0032206483,0.0072648716,0.006721945,0.00025381858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017193262,0.000013243065,0.0019699752,0.000027156633,0.000008450292,0.0002114855,0.020276206,0.00049382553,0.00012597091,0.9630087,0.005596633,0.008251205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009508496,0.000032356584,0.011831139,0.0003621499,0.00006857235,0.00024033689,0.04161137,0.004700036,0.0008244557,0.618015,0.32201076,0.00020874667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9784607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9875731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12492066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12492066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23520362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90636706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888759974","doi":"","title":"Cross Cultural Marriages in Toronto: An Ethnographic Study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology (July 15-21, 2018)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Sociology; Geography; Gender studies; Anthropology","score_opus":0.051055320178995646,"score_gpt":0.40925632547896035,"score_spread":0.3582010052999647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888759974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903842,0.00081660494,0.00015849143,0.0005978972,0.000016623459,0.000054299526,0.00034795867,0.00000627009,0.007617539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994722,0.0009852429,0.00018410991,0.00016271212,0.000009622284,0.000048804137,0.00017396585,0.000009984279,0.0037035493],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980767,0.0007012815,0.000090110065,0.00021218653,0.00025292102,0.00066681486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99598265,0.0013825216,0.0006582882,0.00017880797,0.0005345928,0.0012631186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011503493,0.000519319,0.00059697113,0.0026958827,0.02748258,0.0037758674,0.0014302091,0.0011097335,0.0065916823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00445307,0.0008208566,0.000325627,0.008968279,0.0055993083,0.002219228,0.0071476363,0.0020930753,0.00045072247],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002800125,0.000035154346,0.026940212,0.000060963357,0.0000068011836,0.0012724941,0.96671474,0.000039096587,0.00031571966,0.000979733,0.0006516689,0.0029554255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002331208,0.000029642395,0.05101131,0.00006181807,0.000009463135,0.00016276303,0.9430394,0.000044286997,0.00008421598,0.000063834974,0.005480592,0.000010341226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91923726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98170704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080762744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036746368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022277035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2666148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891045845","doi":"","title":"주요제국의 행정제도 동향조사 : 캐나다의 연방정부조직","year":2005,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"기본연구과제","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Diversification (marketing strategy); Political science; Geography; Economic growth; Economy; Business; Economics; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.034948885510516364,"score_gpt":0.32591657645758454,"score_spread":0.2909676909470682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891045845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006514742,0.015482704,0.002211829,0.047403827,0.0023933197,0.00005674071,0.0002226955,0.000093221606,0.9256209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3315576,0.016605038,0.0048986166,0.014418727,0.0012727838,0.00016987175,0.00037688523,0.00022549595,0.630475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968066,0.0009963365,0.00010613753,0.00059143093,0.001010167,0.00048936956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779296,0.00036989598,0.00014505426,0.00016013593,0.001104645,0.00042739295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022045004,0.0006521536,0.00041302486,0.0012918764,0.008604989,0.012898168,0.00081720325,0.0028435506,0.031687956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032592772,0.00037197876,0.00030336072,0.0020268161,0.01556074,0.005532806,0.0026439768,0.0042450223,0.01083643],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041926483,0.000034089957,0.0015672701,0.0002055952,0.000013528028,0.00022861795,0.01869273,0.00018624694,0.00043821175,0.7026283,0.19774547,0.07821801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053829444,0.000009212932,0.0011102568,0.0002885539,0.0000058691226,0.0001037902,0.006866335,0.000057141177,0.0001558939,0.04278594,0.94859546,0.000016286054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13090496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15568957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.869095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016010176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01751764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26028603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892097750","doi":"10.11575/prism/32770","title":"Comparing the Views of Judges and Lawyers Practicing in Alberta and in the Rest of Canada on Selected Issues in Family Law: Parenting, Self-represented Litigants and Mediation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rest (music); Mediation; Law; Child custody; Family mediation; Family law; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Criminology; Social psychology; Alternative dispute resolution; Medicine","score_opus":0.024229679603642706,"score_gpt":0.2545184291030331,"score_spread":0.23028874949939038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892097750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951873,0.000306108,0.00004469395,0.00085530384,0.000009779709,0.000013995072,0.000037119466,0.0000019282566,0.0035438174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99634737,0.0006072635,0.000101593054,0.0005947053,0.000007041666,0.000009203301,0.000046572608,0.0000027375581,0.0022836518],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535537,0.0009973778,0.00015634662,0.00021343511,0.0017405337,0.001536894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98863375,0.0021708773,0.0017382893,0.00014744666,0.00349858,0.003811017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033312235,0.00018827988,0.00026979638,0.0018335102,0.009782324,0.0034871835,0.0010455477,0.000936417,0.0019780912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008812392,0.0003805738,0.00019316713,0.0026135885,0.0047957134,0.00060950674,0.0025726722,0.0014913,0.00015959189],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106135514,0.00010268913,0.4010834,0.000098052464,0.000032763717,0.0016420297,0.56643635,0.00018031872,0.002079324,0.0010943421,0.003309809,0.023834756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007311198,0.000051305604,0.33752248,0.000078481295,0.000012116781,0.00019677167,0.6550571,0.00008611711,0.00017181809,0.000081583195,0.0067095426,0.00002544425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9506509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9872781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04934913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021427691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031033892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15546954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892352327","doi":"","title":"Legal Parenthood and the Recognition of Alternative Family Forms in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New Brunswick Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.0201569405225987,"score_gpt":0.2356620238105425,"score_spread":0.2155050832879438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892352327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89268523,0.002920527,0.00031962866,0.02669473,0.00014143098,0.00005678306,0.00028763755,0.000011010302,0.07688293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98440766,0.0009783395,0.00023308935,0.0011814935,0.000009864096,0.000012392695,0.00004768016,0.000007919124,0.013121523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956566,0.0005532498,0.00010125613,0.00031672083,0.0009383136,0.0024339743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898677,0.0019673582,0.0007801177,0.00025638577,0.0035300083,0.003598389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032438952,0.00016661354,0.00058461144,0.0016670482,0.029612925,0.006772843,0.0026620151,0.0025779756,0.0072372127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012611784,0.00048537116,0.00037458862,0.002962278,0.0078873,0.001836089,0.0037340203,0.0050069974,0.00021379335],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041379876,0.00037160638,0.23057687,0.00016108784,0.000068763555,0.0034381794,0.25015607,0.001730568,0.0008311869,0.3748614,0.036731895,0.10065858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015721231,0.0001209477,0.36158136,0.0007357095,0.00012628695,0.0012189312,0.41534132,0.004273751,0.0011260527,0.021581858,0.19342919,0.00030747845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99848735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.159499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.159499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29234394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97486204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892368281","doi":"","title":"Not All Law Is an Artifact: Jurisprudence Meets the Common Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisprudence; Artifact (error); Common law; Comparative law; Normative; Philosophy of law; Ideology; Public law; Political science; Private law; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0787690301470707,"score_gpt":0.3736214750902019,"score_spread":0.2948524449431312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892368281","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018053561,0.020925028,0.03619042,0.630768,0.002289967,0.000065671346,0.000035448495,0.00011096534,0.2915609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8844838,0.004866029,0.011405045,0.07461779,0.0032322768,0.00020574903,0.00003908784,0.00018497971,0.020965237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95645785,0.028965786,0.0010804057,0.003564776,0.007215967,0.002715154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9653267,0.025411537,0.0010761624,0.003431405,0.0027401268,0.0020140682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03706619,0.0005236337,0.0013022306,0.0022374878,0.018378358,0.021341264,0.0028923578,0.020715792,0.0031246555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04297712,0.0006942919,0.00094514305,0.0013499684,0.09078396,0.024837438,0.012818685,0.018254098,0.0008098234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032400517,0.0000065818017,0.00006268052,0.000009532547,0.0000022942697,0.000066398956,0.0034188041,0.00005804812,0.000026287793,0.99071455,0.0040354473,0.0015960807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011910465,0.000011483014,0.000113436654,0.00007746929,0.000003617114,0.000071082635,0.0020073636,0.00030205207,0.000049260467,0.92489713,0.07244139,0.000013737694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014617675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014449726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03706619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012244389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013845596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1960271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896629719","doi":"10.3138/tjt.2018-0078","title":"On Grace Jantzen’s Feminist Philosophy of Religion: A Question Concerning Divine-Humanity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Humanity; Theology; Epistemology; Injustice; Perfection; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03582979904936109,"score_gpt":0.3400846337376386,"score_spread":0.3042548346882775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896629719","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02648221,0.04376587,0.0023744046,0.5768745,0.0020512997,0.000051236,0.00014894773,0.000032932,0.34821862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77517134,0.019875096,0.0020657387,0.084492706,0.0019760164,0.000095024065,0.00006728641,0.00014179408,0.11611499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971468,0.001116468,0.000027613232,0.00026081214,0.0009844761,0.0004638412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981528,0.0010570182,0.000087486056,0.000053484862,0.00040135076,0.00024787136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026475566,0.00046095002,0.00048298368,0.0014008011,0.016400294,0.0052217823,0.0015624297,0.0040573217,0.004074021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004213399,0.00021648296,0.00028279875,0.0015999997,0.047486696,0.004766958,0.002717631,0.005982808,0.00041669724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021480111,0.00001044938,0.00019928731,0.00006629503,0.0000036920546,0.00026209897,0.063996695,0.00015277223,0.00014620455,0.8648401,0.0624364,0.007864645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011280066,0.000015980537,0.0009579972,0.0003851254,0.0000057140505,0.00017221674,0.04658992,0.00016166759,0.00017383929,0.20722918,0.74425745,0.00003967525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52023697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6874249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52023697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023763606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015575471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9651769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896992681","doi":"10.7202/1051103ar","title":"SERVICES DE SUPERVISION DES DROITS D’ACCÈS AU QUÉBEC","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social work review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.03519947571919116,"score_gpt":0.31314083640693086,"score_spread":0.27794136068773967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896992681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8459952,0.0019262838,0.0027991312,0.005141629,0.00018159857,0.000566923,0.0029756455,0.00018833805,0.14022522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9482622,0.0013182948,0.0032004502,0.0006896776,0.000022891241,0.00029739144,0.0009074382,0.000027110495,0.045274377],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883074,0.00038490983,0.000047897134,0.00010743434,0.00029903752,0.00033002722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99426633,0.00059151824,0.0004358551,0.00020777833,0.002799724,0.0016988432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011936056,0.00022727707,0.00022698038,0.00060026685,0.0040964982,0.0011172801,0.00065994886,0.0003657338,0.016175583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048043462,0.00015817236,0.00015033157,0.0012217392,0.0007424697,0.00051171763,0.0012191759,0.00067637285,0.0008389825],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040692356,0.0005034361,0.41263837,0.0010075346,0.00010601942,0.0024457455,0.112532824,0.0014732348,0.003679368,0.0146467,0.09295481,0.3576051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040394138,0.00019641982,0.695576,0.00089922955,0.000042308475,0.0003452905,0.06397882,0.0012798163,0.0007211517,0.0006829153,0.23617311,0.00006457489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95489985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97299093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045100152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015127317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042988304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10975689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897248548","doi":"","title":"Chapter Fifteen. The Canadian Constitution and Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"OpenEdition (OpenEdition)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0236415383864276,"score_gpt":0.25133188897481146,"score_spread":0.22769035058838386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897248548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007772388,0.015335972,0.00046174263,0.00775435,0.0014956995,0.000059055892,0.0008953676,0.000043345543,0.97317713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03878044,0.018164348,0.0020077492,0.0047906707,0.00042084788,0.00010353844,0.00088597153,0.00010175839,0.93474466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848807,0.00012244655,0.00003149267,0.00013885522,0.0008666318,0.00035245353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992205,0.00009736951,0.000021031725,0.00003642238,0.0005281199,0.00009649373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008770583,0.0006955585,0.00044085647,0.0029045413,0.010575217,0.007072342,0.0013106576,0.0021934384,0.032211874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001548699,0.00035927942,0.00029199716,0.0045203306,0.0060720895,0.001997168,0.0011391769,0.0034817646,0.004018921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004496916,0.000008204474,0.0001246878,0.00006373812,0.0000012917319,0.000039351522,0.0013444147,0.00011414453,0.000055044715,0.66165584,0.3119015,0.024687331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.960282e-7,9.5197066e-7,0.00032684434,0.00011182148,0.0000011288545,0.000016023057,0.00027591197,0.000021275217,0.000021445065,0.008812758,0.99040496,0.000005920797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9398331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.968513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06448848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06448848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08410079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46789885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897491608","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0042","title":"The Living Tree","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Constitution; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Original meaning; Politics; Subject (documents); Sociology; Style (visual arts); Political science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.0462312253613946,"score_gpt":0.25935693591547215,"score_spread":0.21312571055407756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897491608","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076366006,0.0046624346,0.003608104,0.011261296,0.0005530079,0.000024415212,0.00012195609,0.00006651234,0.9720658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5784118,0.008898204,0.004198851,0.0043901135,0.00034356004,0.00004739955,0.0002642144,0.00018941257,0.4032563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850214,0.00024394023,0.000018490804,0.00020098286,0.00065520866,0.00037920856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991339,0.00019621277,0.000031919066,0.000098009834,0.00036044858,0.0001795577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011065154,0.00026869256,0.0002637003,0.0012285748,0.01032139,0.0067159017,0.0010256623,0.0012619176,0.018724259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002015297,0.00013925764,0.00021908812,0.0014860273,0.022015221,0.003465244,0.0023857958,0.002826954,0.0018824806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023770287,0.0000019625109,0.00006346816,0.000010939861,6.5216045e-7,0.00002387451,0.0037653379,0.00005286885,0.000039539278,0.9759245,0.012254668,0.0078597935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020217003,0.000004294045,0.00039139285,0.00009778403,0.000002780801,0.000055658144,0.0033467247,0.0001268031,0.00007938823,0.10722616,0.8886594,0.0000075087273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5398236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6257588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5398236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025569681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025261702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92577296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898266942","doi":"10.1017/s0034412517000439","title":"‘Do not examine, but believe?’: a classicist's perspective on Teresa Morgan's<i>Roman Faith and Christian Faith</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religious Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Perspective (graphical); Philosophy; Christian faith; Theology; Art","score_opus":0.038293952413219465,"score_gpt":0.3387702753950732,"score_spread":0.3004763229818537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898266942","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0622211,0.0630839,0.007984256,0.4642636,0.0061553097,0.000051407224,0.00007878799,0.000057571604,0.3961041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91646874,0.008357833,0.0030511494,0.03457786,0.0018988773,0.000050324044,0.000015938445,0.000040942276,0.035538267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975782,0.0016723967,0.00005191442,0.00017054954,0.000312799,0.00021414465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99653196,0.0026148378,0.00021913489,0.00014349578,0.00031297345,0.00017748978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003441334,0.00025890238,0.0002875123,0.0010262008,0.0055979723,0.0051727025,0.000842591,0.0022792686,0.0015747075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006283655,0.00020619566,0.00014945527,0.001023486,0.033744093,0.0048694573,0.0024521553,0.0052513783,0.000114291404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008665449,0.000006550088,0.00013002631,0.000045190565,0.0000023872612,0.0000934013,0.03887884,0.000054130196,0.000038723087,0.9381966,0.017568588,0.004976809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016070502,0.000029478002,0.0009349217,0.00049863255,0.0000125074985,0.00056723796,0.044835478,0.00032073486,0.00028553943,0.3778779,0.574596,0.000025552941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014281228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022568103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014281228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006416507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030383163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04655528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898506936","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0018","title":"Same-sex marriage beyond Charter dialogue: Charter cases and contestation within government","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Parliament; Appeal; Law; Cabinet (room); Political science; Charter; Legislature; Caucus; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.017619022394133373,"score_gpt":0.246761469031435,"score_spread":0.22914244663730163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898506936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3504045,0.006012675,0.0067383065,0.1084998,0.0007838384,0.00007732228,0.00006258663,0.0000472058,0.52737373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861485,0.00047411423,0.00032764726,0.0045101675,0.00012860842,0.00002850032,0.000010038845,0.000015505111,0.008356842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9753998,0.014348144,0.00043883943,0.0019239078,0.0033501366,0.0045391712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815331,0.01401751,0.0010730422,0.0010512056,0.0010602354,0.0012648816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017185766,0.00026510388,0.00053900905,0.0016529812,0.035641607,0.014710142,0.002003586,0.009855935,0.0042821653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027778743,0.00041354547,0.0005679549,0.0022853664,0.053377435,0.010586269,0.009960414,0.011473225,0.00028412623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009548706,0.0000111729405,0.0006638972,0.000010178407,0.000002145321,0.0005484396,0.070728526,0.00008389485,0.00005454682,0.9229105,0.0027469357,0.0022301355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056800745,0.000061518775,0.005259893,0.00045344816,0.000034481505,0.00090938335,0.23397149,0.0013033224,0.0011829817,0.35665745,0.399991,0.00011831837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.130994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13970302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.869006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025272053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014737461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26046312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W289929389","doi":"","title":"The Windsor Report: Communion, Structure, and Covenant","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Ecclesiology; Sociology; Law; Blessing; Theology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.03598689748304259,"score_gpt":0.3470437128438006,"score_spread":0.311056815360758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W289929389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14744322,0.11036117,0.0019324181,0.21931395,0.009997101,0.00007264839,0.0007837575,0.00009854067,0.5099972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8741016,0.026360912,0.0005697873,0.010608955,0.0029923988,0.00007832391,0.00046219633,0.00012476846,0.084700905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932012,0.0028814033,0.0003007413,0.0005492366,0.0017775588,0.0012899528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946032,0.0018648709,0.0009048932,0.00048157756,0.0015591094,0.00058622373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060262517,0.0003548307,0.00018887073,0.0017974883,0.010138075,0.010195081,0.0010277505,0.0021724189,0.004618549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011684775,0.00034915307,0.00014442283,0.002704944,0.013764506,0.008676995,0.0034820824,0.0024100866,0.0006398942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045333538,0.000015258754,0.007596643,0.00019136272,0.000011808064,0.00048828058,0.13927965,0.000062309904,0.0001246931,0.4860084,0.3125866,0.053589683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044787967,0.000012550379,0.018190632,0.0005818673,0.0000046213477,0.0002442115,0.08495208,0.000030199419,0.00008435651,0.008930627,0.8869335,0.000030823194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13477445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16055286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13477445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062212395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009188443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26797992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899741704","doi":"10.29173/psur22","title":"The District of Sechelt, British Columbia and the Municipal System of Aboriginal Self-Government","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Undergraduate Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Misnomer; Public administration; Criticism; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.016476495759598715,"score_gpt":0.31311775407878895,"score_spread":0.29664125831919025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899741704","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10367688,0.65033734,0.0003053185,0.009264751,0.0004994973,0.00010646987,0.000474123,0.000030758187,0.23530485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7350512,0.23424868,0.00052000984,0.0018170684,0.00005139275,0.00007857173,0.00029019176,0.000007769163,0.027935097],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990434,0.0003135289,0.00005009831,0.0000705244,0.00030903512,0.0002133812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987249,0.00035389717,0.00016286445,0.000048114318,0.0005654622,0.00014479151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088533113,0.00016413661,0.0003404292,0.001468482,0.002837914,0.0031964201,0.0006938345,0.0005532665,0.003113476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025637043,0.00014452187,0.00010865533,0.005065595,0.0019181552,0.0005915756,0.0009293154,0.000682647,0.00021742913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020731354,0.00008500263,0.020085294,0.01942822,0.00020951677,0.0015829816,0.0141085675,0.0014900555,0.0009706689,0.2168505,0.06387074,0.6611111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038446855,0.00007942607,0.093250826,0.0074395756,0.00021812806,0.00042263785,0.017800007,0.00020027402,0.0004580372,0.004310739,0.87572736,0.000054533324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91469955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9731996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085300446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02003339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06654851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17160553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900548833","doi":"10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0996","title":"Women’s Court of Canada Act and Rules","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oñati Socio-legal Series","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Charter; Statute; Gender equality; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy; Gender studies","score_opus":0.015183532868191707,"score_gpt":0.2640684918246616,"score_spread":0.24888495895646986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900548833","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017446693,0.0048828865,0.0023241213,0.08935796,0.0009962574,0.00013001908,0.0011132152,0.00006882172,0.8836801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6080373,0.005234325,0.0049706316,0.048823252,0.00041797655,0.00025816343,0.00084631256,0.000108420085,0.33130366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98731565,0.0014308306,0.00033515063,0.0011293754,0.0066761035,0.0031128353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930073,0.0013751971,0.00033754497,0.0003274129,0.0037588428,0.0011936588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044590416,0.0004813002,0.00048173306,0.0016761458,0.019718079,0.011115229,0.0019514663,0.005444181,0.009808585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017127031,0.000446269,0.00044239874,0.0019793287,0.010768683,0.0020912096,0.0024489698,0.005487991,0.0009639023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006890427,0.0000066319967,0.0008934385,0.000014667859,0.000004600777,0.000066493274,0.0029528746,0.0001819491,0.000071597846,0.9440711,0.046658415,0.005071299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002043741,0.000010803108,0.00604491,0.00031318748,0.000024409344,0.00007629961,0.0046956064,0.0005445612,0.00022514569,0.061033107,0.9269309,0.00008052699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99033886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116482235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.116482235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2808561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8451417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901042035","doi":"10.1353/scb.2018.0015","title":"Bathsua Makin and Mary More with a Reply to More by Robert Whitehall: Educating English Daughters: Late Seventeenth-Century Debates ed. by Frances Teague and Margaret J. M. Ezell","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Scriblerian and the Kit-Cats","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Renaissance; Reading (process); History; Classics; Literature; Art history; Art; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.017136017581876523,"score_gpt":0.29623668402963504,"score_spread":0.27910066644775855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901042035","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00084124,0.14226484,0.00012225236,0.760945,0.067432545,0.000026026693,0.00019301735,0.000044230528,0.028130798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025914341,0.17252885,0.00053471007,0.37914187,0.06864064,0.00019636675,0.0004405075,0.00055305107,0.35204974],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997359,0.0008148209,0.00017357574,0.00033911975,0.0010693952,0.00024418996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950713,0.0019556384,0.00043473157,0.00021137558,0.0015290473,0.000797994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035567805,0.0010445019,0.0010437155,0.001285713,0.0068821902,0.0061393254,0.0019486748,0.007621772,0.038135152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011342251,0.0007620862,0.0005523486,0.00196458,0.0057815756,0.008504031,0.004363043,0.009884847,0.012386421],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006016207,0.0000028521724,0.00004604622,0.00008268819,0.000001619705,0.00004729199,0.0017663368,0.0000043221844,0.000021786296,0.0016854706,0.9926058,0.0037298365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031057923,0.0000031812758,0.00041431087,0.00039852588,0.0000025141903,0.000049467,0.0025075865,0.0000031936602,0.00003875015,0.00045050072,0.99611926,0.000009566022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031024868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06714839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038135152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053287013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006061244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12757474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902178520","doi":"","title":"The Seal of Confession and Canadian Law","year":2011,"lang":"la","type":"article","venue":"Ius ecclesiae","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confession (law); Law; Political science; History; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.05008196712956786,"score_gpt":0.2893678218443773,"score_spread":0.23928585471480945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902178520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22935475,0.011317131,0.000635997,0.08898247,0.00056564424,0.000042875075,0.00028815737,0.000033019154,0.6687799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95776075,0.0022375423,0.00021775185,0.0045583155,0.000090823305,0.000018069151,0.00004635519,0.000027031216,0.035043437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99160963,0.0015188156,0.00018205906,0.0006531351,0.002218511,0.003817876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98710966,0.0050478587,0.0008445244,0.00058194547,0.0043352228,0.0020808522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061033703,0.00035808672,0.0006428714,0.004640154,0.049979236,0.015358887,0.0025829254,0.005842547,0.016460631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028116176,0.00053291966,0.00038537342,0.0071742083,0.034676533,0.0061881435,0.006875828,0.007474947,0.00042068586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029986944,0.00002079902,0.003238559,0.000047506925,0.00000792233,0.00015952735,0.08455662,0.00010750921,0.00006139908,0.8718402,0.025001336,0.014928616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003207713,0.000034367786,0.03990739,0.0007849943,0.00005408266,0.00027836833,0.26490244,0.00044373394,0.00032519473,0.11247667,0.5805661,0.00019462139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9921509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13563378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13563378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1868127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9840966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902207069","doi":"10.11575/prism/34304","title":"Overview of Provincial Wildlife Laws","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Law; Political science; Geography; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.09018609874813734,"score_gpt":0.3782934267132247,"score_spread":0.28810732796508737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902207069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011564045,0.09047767,0.0061649852,0.022437382,0.0017591869,0.00032083737,0.012229444,0.0006627383,0.8543838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27297527,0.23443149,0.021880122,0.008990722,0.0007851533,0.0003538182,0.019171912,0.0005357772,0.4408758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968117,0.0001377074,0.00012884036,0.00018159753,0.0021259917,0.00061422226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99608237,0.00033431285,0.00016870725,0.00011771534,0.0029933408,0.00030357516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014120828,0.00041304962,0.00036585168,0.011000905,0.007007335,0.0042996677,0.0014616073,0.0008502808,0.015665157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003960979,0.0003762903,0.00040326698,0.01754489,0.0016793733,0.0015618146,0.0013295321,0.0011200625,0.0021592346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031706062,0.00003399317,0.007259517,0.0010183752,0.000014697307,0.0003149008,0.0037235061,0.0015707022,0.00053907867,0.39059693,0.3830829,0.21181363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020692955,0.0000036391602,0.0058410885,0.00021743562,0.0000064367728,0.00005985756,0.0004752155,0.00022414958,0.0000718014,0.0039160387,0.9891685,0.000013790774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9783972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98571014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9783972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07376687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12128672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5352186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902281681","doi":"10.22215/etd/2010-06456","title":"Playing the survivor : how (and if) women recover from spousal abuse","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Auteur theory; Political science; Art history","score_opus":0.019725334461717783,"score_gpt":0.28991840716653405,"score_spread":0.2701930727048163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902281681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9325244,0.0036110042,0.00022182189,0.040372893,0.00022204475,0.000045134537,0.00021029953,0.00001761238,0.02277484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98786795,0.0042910078,0.00011514075,0.0022310487,0.000051725605,0.000032005068,0.00009860323,0.000009697936,0.00530282],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981944,0.0008957979,0.00007587129,0.000092626,0.000117268704,0.0006239517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99720544,0.0007706462,0.0007182651,0.00016205359,0.00031880633,0.00082478323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017677154,0.00023723369,0.00034104768,0.0008606349,0.0063926047,0.0038272622,0.0011613496,0.0025389595,0.009120827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014383871,0.0003053929,0.00040767723,0.0009622363,0.0033648594,0.0049261604,0.0027812412,0.0032462226,0.0010341351],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002764717,0.000697983,0.26925108,0.000247349,0.00007159154,0.003081623,0.5768255,0.00010615515,0.00027610123,0.006547137,0.022579288,0.12003976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010635041,0.00009425194,0.04810085,0.00034524422,0.000023714478,0.00092384696,0.9376344,0.00006681404,0.0000605127,0.0015371152,0.011183039,0.000019548434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05770359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.093422756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05770359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002287467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003695013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114735425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902580100","doi":"","title":"Law, grace and same-sex marriage : Canadian Lutheran perspectives","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Corpus Université Laval (Université Laval)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Law; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.01738901821355757,"score_gpt":0.21143124017873327,"score_spread":0.1940422219651757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902580100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19887389,0.07681522,0.00067369686,0.18985504,0.00084336044,0.000049306134,0.00048985344,0.00004643736,0.5323533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9004855,0.024746263,0.00033183998,0.0077025574,0.00018037182,0.00002660794,0.000080988095,0.000031478423,0.06641438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750715,0.0005121226,0.00004561583,0.00020157844,0.00058577,0.0011477458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979101,0.0007443431,0.00013531961,0.0000688549,0.00056074036,0.00058054697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002140354,0.00044015519,0.00046600617,0.0034637658,0.039899908,0.008795685,0.0019464764,0.0036459211,0.009062447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036616586,0.00030476696,0.0003082822,0.00675119,0.026330255,0.0025884581,0.0030588808,0.0033250814,0.0003367988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038405753,0.000028520053,0.0037471622,0.00017223133,0.000011581247,0.0006350274,0.25459376,0.0002612473,0.00022202599,0.6788041,0.037325818,0.024160108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012553569,0.000013576053,0.015511687,0.0004440431,0.000021662177,0.00021752407,0.26200616,0.00023447351,0.00016056681,0.024576055,0.6967223,0.00007936408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99802005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18039478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18039478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.124755904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9506259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903125066","doi":"10.3138/9781442660601-012","title":"9. Reforming Family Dispute Resolution in Ontario: Systemic Changes and Cultural Shifts","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Resolution (logic); Political science; Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04737464023419731,"score_gpt":0.2446317178249067,"score_spread":0.19725707759070937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903125066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059051085,0.01602071,0.0021647734,0.16105612,0.0011454213,0.00024678474,0.00071238424,0.00007335356,0.75952923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4252138,0.009426519,0.002630864,0.011961658,0.00028577674,0.00016959888,0.0002515448,0.00008293494,0.5499773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641126,0.00060430344,0.00012702539,0.0002369117,0.0011124646,0.0015080057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966143,0.0008811388,0.00022367858,0.00019358634,0.0013541967,0.0007331551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030387163,0.0003306485,0.00028141926,0.0010977371,0.026872825,0.008722728,0.0019336885,0.0049653137,0.017263807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070800344,0.0004945776,0.000398496,0.0032140617,0.009815701,0.0032466024,0.0030154884,0.0031335172,0.0008397963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036425627,0.000030502424,0.004418524,0.00023331252,0.000011638068,0.00082861865,0.12644877,0.0005344528,0.00034708309,0.5776571,0.23234631,0.057107333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015009093,0.000012398779,0.010461567,0.00024608622,0.000016114558,0.00009613082,0.033560507,0.00017612836,0.00019643217,0.014370532,0.94081724,0.00003185699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99121815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8412975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15870248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23324853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97578585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903351489","doi":"","title":"Le droit à la vie privée en droit québécois et canadien","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.015778115863244693,"score_gpt":0.28564907073586904,"score_spread":0.26987095487262436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903351489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8416376,0.009164969,0.00053517986,0.02921239,0.0003513997,0.000029887095,0.00054563314,0.000020525335,0.11850249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9300848,0.0024154638,0.00026073898,0.0017891906,0.00006044228,0.000029534738,0.00011094403,0.00001895375,0.06522997],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981281,0.00052346615,0.000043609096,0.00014040788,0.0003937881,0.0007705608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636674,0.0011721792,0.00045447136,0.000105758445,0.0006674234,0.0012334483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001409555,0.00030369032,0.00046659872,0.0012672637,0.013318643,0.004915233,0.0009003043,0.0022609043,0.01350931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045073614,0.00027783038,0.00039848898,0.0025919382,0.004095419,0.0020252147,0.0015368053,0.005006549,0.0004505036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029629545,0.0005049949,0.16647448,0.00034967213,0.00021320101,0.0053934767,0.35453424,0.0013224597,0.001779939,0.321331,0.047597997,0.100202315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003592571,0.000092478964,0.34614575,0.0007726432,0.000062400206,0.00096364284,0.24808496,0.0005212761,0.00041670143,0.004775524,0.39796153,0.000167253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98442614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99259675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046994817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046994817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039551366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3409729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903789803","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwy048","title":"Trinity Western University v The Law Society of Upper Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Statutory law; Supreme court; Political science; Appeal; Constitution; Common law; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.020196930270328102,"score_gpt":0.2676772516344703,"score_spread":0.24748032136414222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903789803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019386036,0.0042803143,0.0007388515,0.06347169,0.0020399343,0.00018266827,0.001021758,0.0001858656,0.90869296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12451325,0.0018767954,0.0006773147,0.062008534,0.0003656847,0.00015776607,0.00032569276,0.00009333541,0.8099817],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99536926,0.000235484,0.00010581249,0.00042282272,0.0021233598,0.0017431768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954639,0.00060832273,0.00013091601,0.00019864221,0.0020630185,0.0015351953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017390647,0.00046028462,0.00028757646,0.0012697187,0.01728397,0.0061696526,0.0012943662,0.0057015806,0.032705475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068449285,0.00061257416,0.00044414238,0.00133917,0.0031603845,0.0018118384,0.002375609,0.0062076543,0.0030482856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006358592,0.000029500034,0.004137587,0.00009485249,0.000016416328,0.0006601053,0.0023311179,0.00016880265,0.0006179051,0.3644982,0.5996072,0.027774539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002546615,0.000016093836,0.004685926,0.00015714914,0.00001583982,0.00011031965,0.0010125041,0.00015431226,0.0002869492,0.0049123354,0.9885805,0.000042666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.959129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9873468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9581124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04188756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15624873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30391693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903983943","doi":"","title":"New Brunswick acts and regulations - Family Services Act","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.05548825549410066,"score_gpt":0.3025754819052912,"score_spread":0.24708722641119055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903983943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033038665,0.0073606,0.00077119627,0.061632283,0.004026986,0.0022059644,0.022228194,0.00022652802,0.86850953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041160166,0.0024318914,0.0021043655,0.039489307,0.00019402943,0.0015959961,0.0031420358,0.00014776627,0.90973437],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98844576,0.0017963769,0.0012682304,0.0010353236,0.004020849,0.0034334697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98701394,0.0051701744,0.00067202566,0.0014455687,0.004338115,0.0013599963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070874733,0.0011718817,0.0012462444,0.0039171986,0.017832603,0.012071486,0.006405354,0.011990482,0.049106736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017705828,0.0030158167,0.0013087796,0.006774026,0.0040737637,0.0031927302,0.004176693,0.014050205,0.008015625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026804846,0.00024554564,0.009061333,0.0003728136,0.00008665122,0.0017298467,0.010012774,0.00043189063,0.0014311662,0.26546496,0.6927889,0.018106123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013193756,0.000037519385,0.039431937,0.0009300556,0.00006506881,0.00024704862,0.0063864943,0.00016285124,0.0009882321,0.003997483,0.94740605,0.00021531673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94668627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.985786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07705292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07705292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15757705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5590607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904557932","doi":"","title":"JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE: CONTEMPORARY PRESSURES AND APPROPRIATE RESPONSES","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Judicial independence; Independence (probability theory); Law; Criticism; Political science; Judicial activism; Supreme court; Judicial review; Government (linguistics); Judicial opinion; Judicial discretion; Citizenship; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07678461801054327,"score_gpt":0.3393280790654607,"score_spread":0.26254346105491744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904557932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03349458,0.027609164,0.0025163756,0.36801735,0.0020174154,0.000036125293,0.00007323681,0.000040262606,0.5661955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90464497,0.01733701,0.00060975336,0.04775593,0.004194268,0.00007821899,0.00004563935,0.00007138497,0.02526287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96978,0.01018559,0.0011349597,0.0033526877,0.0101454845,0.0054012835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97474784,0.01258705,0.0022704047,0.0011990716,0.0065601803,0.0026354166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018937526,0.00033244703,0.0005567741,0.0029479014,0.014110813,0.01858315,0.0023716637,0.010412829,0.006894318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045872252,0.00048177116,0.0002932031,0.0040766024,0.057515815,0.008280916,0.006160172,0.01387749,0.0006904454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071842724,0.0000074729987,0.0002731212,0.00002963008,0.0000021051317,0.00005940091,0.005357985,0.000044155306,0.000042869662,0.97433996,0.013134252,0.006701989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004051075,0.000019347743,0.0041091866,0.0005854823,0.000010989372,0.00015455263,0.019813808,0.0001817333,0.00021767717,0.39128664,0.58353245,0.00004753821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10818509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13341837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96627307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0337269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02504799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24470693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905366745","doi":"","title":"Why Canada's Medical Assistance in Dying Legislation Should Be C(h)arter Compliant and What It May Help to Avoid","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Criminal code; Criminal law; Value (mathematics)","score_opus":0.03506262982360589,"score_gpt":0.3234960041081253,"score_spread":0.28843337428451943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905366745","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017023467,0.00454787,0.00063149113,0.9154443,0.0022671307,0.000059743288,0.0003024686,0.000072450195,0.059651032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27545217,0.0044343723,0.0020024993,0.6882631,0.0008511181,0.0000636957,0.00021898039,0.000069458256,0.028644519],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98397416,0.0015165522,0.00040992151,0.001071466,0.006699199,0.0063287406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9754479,0.005159988,0.0012993015,0.00045048873,0.011654262,0.0059880256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010521821,0.00035096667,0.0005140381,0.0010471366,0.023535568,0.0131603405,0.0031494128,0.016583586,0.005816264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038355198,0.0005031569,0.0009149418,0.0016108013,0.016264798,0.0046971436,0.0031284022,0.015217278,0.00074929115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051072933,0.00008147379,0.012556242,0.00031877006,0.000049083348,0.00084152166,0.009366497,0.00034414986,0.00065934326,0.37897652,0.56497777,0.03177758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010513511,0.00006871815,0.031777,0.0012352328,0.000113050344,0.00039739037,0.018668659,0.00053544785,0.0010211334,0.025923112,0.9197822,0.00037290165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9796535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98923254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9215465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07845346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32100427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56922233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905908727","doi":"","title":"Are You My Mother? Parentage in a Non-Conjugal Family","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Family law; Legislation; Declaration; Law; Legislature; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Nuclear family; Sociology; Genealogy; History","score_opus":0.03444419869297577,"score_gpt":0.3142927364127994,"score_spread":0.27984853771982365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905908727","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3375845,0.020847818,0.0032039587,0.3497452,0.004044253,0.00009216447,0.00021040549,0.000083977706,0.28418776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90505207,0.0062872684,0.0007674614,0.032854937,0.00022025808,0.000023275863,0.000040315317,0.000018501738,0.05473591],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986951,0.00041043208,0.00003586052,0.00012699433,0.00028874475,0.0004430268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992551,0.00017755284,0.00010494716,0.00003912049,0.00015249173,0.00027078943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017197848,0.00013153479,0.00020634476,0.0002465072,0.015436867,0.0020608304,0.00061731244,0.0015904602,0.004818786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002717472,0.00012554972,0.00016554161,0.00034646015,0.005743977,0.0016849379,0.00208272,0.0023460903,0.00054766715],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040329607,0.000077583005,0.03847878,0.0000892802,0.000013471264,0.012987286,0.5124048,0.000057391582,0.0013871914,0.21309118,0.14887297,0.07249975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000143571515,0.000056198616,0.022408033,0.0003648557,0.000016707736,0.007551926,0.26505432,0.00009363734,0.00049305666,0.009586969,0.69431925,0.000040762843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7082154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85352033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7082154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009826412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01552605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5870059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905935632","doi":"","title":"A History of Canadian Legal Thought: Collected Essays","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04765222907171745,"score_gpt":0.2853197804898607,"score_spread":0.23766755141814322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905935632","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013029011,0.2529475,0.0009217536,0.37654832,0.010075057,0.000120693476,0.0028116575,0.00009854671,0.3434474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44017068,0.24472603,0.0035325438,0.107832395,0.009638504,0.00033992992,0.0015475259,0.00048207326,0.19173034],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.985666,0.001770079,0.0004075163,0.00092336227,0.008469883,0.0027632043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95400393,0.014050169,0.0012358596,0.0011515755,0.026751418,0.002807019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011740058,0.0010773502,0.0011066361,0.027853513,0.038217694,0.024738204,0.003184758,0.005528683,0.013745811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0444118,0.0007478826,0.0006093813,0.047207184,0.028729709,0.006294601,0.003932468,0.0057354597,0.0009951356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022331653,0.000016883443,0.00088194665,0.0005052456,0.000022730814,0.00012395954,0.027609017,0.00012632067,0.00011533999,0.23450181,0.7054925,0.030581847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004245314,0.0000023837526,0.0033732108,0.001011067,0.000018180182,0.000035563855,0.011298064,0.00003941973,0.00007100243,0.006904189,0.9772059,0.00003668599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9849541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2509392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2509392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31801394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86880434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906528280","doi":"","title":"Church Property: A Commentary on Canon Law Governing Temporal Goods in the United States and Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ius ecclesiae","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law; Canon law; Canon; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.02247562225050992,"score_gpt":0.28185571192705505,"score_spread":0.25938008967654513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906528280","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022607375,0.0140954815,0.0006139983,0.8311341,0.007018584,0.000071224335,0.00046436128,0.00003924314,0.123955645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28788966,0.0067669204,0.0009007309,0.58792484,0.0038067885,0.00011776433,0.00011945572,0.00021070182,0.11226317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903583,0.0012921868,0.0003742687,0.0011208361,0.0026750776,0.0041793194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807734,0.010677062,0.0005952529,0.00048102756,0.0050053983,0.0024679278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009330821,0.0005672914,0.0015359853,0.0021526047,0.044311028,0.017235741,0.007652103,0.0471927,0.009865043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029764548,0.0011309615,0.0015124248,0.004185182,0.02398541,0.0059316657,0.0055253305,0.038012944,0.00063013384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008634207,0.00003674675,0.0012901883,0.00014709093,0.000048770293,0.0005285805,0.024547452,0.00042586835,0.00014700313,0.54971945,0.41652164,0.0065008737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009860793,0.000017786053,0.004433447,0.0010533152,0.00014027329,0.000103490434,0.029888872,0.00048511257,0.00038374576,0.036536023,0.9266391,0.00022017235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9871885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12252714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12252714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20870723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8890008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906659702","doi":"","title":"Building Public Trusts and Acceptance in the Nuclear Safety Administration from a Legal Perspective: focused on the Constitutional Duty to Consult and Accommodate Aboriginal Peoples in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Perspective (graphical); Administration (probate law); Law; Political science; Public administration; Computer science","score_opus":0.040055701925358074,"score_gpt":0.31491391552582326,"score_spread":0.2748582136004652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906659702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9442678,0.00032041568,0.0004830675,0.016842825,0.00004977298,0.000038308048,0.00002208039,0.000008205312,0.03796744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99767107,0.00006258538,0.0000619946,0.0002994793,0.0000030262765,0.0000042769666,0.0000027658898,0.0000039720476,0.001890826],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98597175,0.0033025313,0.00023045304,0.0006099042,0.0023790065,0.0075064506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97148424,0.008244131,0.0026873273,0.0008049352,0.007270614,0.009508713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008773446,0.00023450446,0.0005018782,0.0017836025,0.05044727,0.0138755515,0.0029734517,0.0032841566,0.0054948563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02160818,0.0005491281,0.00048448436,0.0020378123,0.032145508,0.005227009,0.009922923,0.009520277,0.00020776539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049581093,0.00015623591,0.05013724,0.000049095186,0.000023586113,0.0009064426,0.84251624,0.00030713197,0.00038664922,0.091149576,0.0030967535,0.011221535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000919204,0.000026329673,0.038129915,0.000118410964,0.000023158911,0.00011839797,0.9362516,0.00046181222,0.00018588817,0.0049148267,0.019711493,0.000049083606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9861114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1368001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1368001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24936266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99255884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907265697","doi":"10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0993","title":"Impact of the Feminist Judgment Writing Projects","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oñati Socio-legal Series","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03517177143915501,"score_gpt":0.33798963998670284,"score_spread":0.30281786854754783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907265697","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07296232,0.01201641,0.0028673864,0.22682127,0.013259066,0.00068575074,0.0007719383,0.00016275585,0.6704531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.796778,0.0075529055,0.0044494937,0.04205775,0.0046192952,0.000888817,0.000637394,0.0004880037,0.14252827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.68131876,0.13314232,0.0115768835,0.013749103,0.14495508,0.015257868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5532009,0.2847274,0.015654474,0.019570224,0.10183507,0.025011891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.165304,0.000844683,0.0011523152,0.008390116,0.030569047,0.02995965,0.005168594,0.0067919455,0.019121904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.40117416,0.0011696094,0.0007719796,0.008341618,0.017742049,0.011475292,0.026052408,0.011042523,0.0018661389],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022116609,0.000329419,0.010318352,0.0017946243,0.0000996416,0.0017352152,0.15486187,0.0007753435,0.0008312293,0.44131112,0.17431997,0.21340196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006436782,0.000098789,0.008512519,0.0025810387,0.000033878303,0.0002524468,0.063697115,0.00026895563,0.0009931019,0.025978008,0.8974296,0.000090175155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.104152024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15039581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.165304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042907376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11276211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87422156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907449402","doi":"10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0994","title":"Turning Feminist Judgments into Jurisprudence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oñati Socio-legal Series","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Tribunal; Humanities; Context (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Constitutional court; Political science; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Constitution","score_opus":0.022731790360261055,"score_gpt":0.32467900587218756,"score_spread":0.3019472155119265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907449402","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028288241,0.0051215184,0.045745205,0.10943394,0.0011668161,0.00008152812,0.00019212124,0.00010446905,0.80986613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95008487,0.0011947666,0.010216225,0.0073631736,0.0004224848,0.00009145767,0.000052140935,0.00016730478,0.03040757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9744272,0.014631308,0.0005312447,0.0023196423,0.006190682,0.0019000133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98179746,0.01253962,0.00068814727,0.0013102958,0.0029758469,0.00068856706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020927992,0.00061089674,0.00080758164,0.004053874,0.01696882,0.019354075,0.0026433445,0.004271048,0.0076347715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032899503,0.00054601283,0.00046769212,0.0022598042,0.10475,0.009349806,0.0071684266,0.008735555,0.0006404879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025682082,0.0000027408814,0.000072161085,0.000012141166,0.0000021508872,0.000032247666,0.008963172,0.00010039472,0.00006902561,0.9871995,0.0015211408,0.0020227723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010610337,0.0000061249884,0.0004960517,0.00015797517,0.0000063921084,0.00002760076,0.017082965,0.00046322282,0.00045743096,0.8227958,0.1584748,0.000021194895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24951312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28615028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24951312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051080544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02411707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4961216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908526279","doi":"10.7202/1055262ar","title":"Le mariage en Chine depuis 1978 : entre les normes sociales et l’État","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012726183318328164,"score_gpt":0.2610788444493381,"score_spread":0.24835266113100993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908526279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7525301,0.009968347,0.00085518154,0.022969915,0.0007552552,0.00007888312,0.00023059917,0.00003669116,0.21257508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9215988,0.0019533255,0.00017680094,0.000859042,0.000074782656,0.000072805095,0.000041306943,0.000028054199,0.0751951],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981974,0.0005693181,0.000045841352,0.00017426857,0.00043384277,0.0005793992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917513,0.0003064408,0.0001285971,0.000063888365,0.00014551588,0.00018034564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001836622,0.00040557166,0.00036628582,0.0010931503,0.010437286,0.004157896,0.0006361676,0.001912582,0.0067722495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035671147,0.00029132506,0.0002258649,0.0019814305,0.012255484,0.0025399402,0.003019096,0.0030862554,0.0004337983],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008346228,0.000017374548,0.008443222,0.00011436372,0.000015751646,0.0007612264,0.5855468,0.00011254161,0.0009372075,0.37518457,0.008314646,0.020468788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002187575,0.00007493949,0.06975341,0.00031753432,0.000034989567,0.00026476817,0.272408,0.00015009848,0.0010763182,0.013105626,0.6426945,0.00009785536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39393255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6110705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39393255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020929055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01441996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7832792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909059062","doi":"","title":"An Autonomy-Based Approach to Section 15(1) of the Charter","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Autonomy; Charter; Section (typography); Plaintiff; Law; Test (biology); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.031028321625016623,"score_gpt":0.26764931251597757,"score_spread":0.23662099089096095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909059062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041646156,0.0037167454,0.08606877,0.1550109,0.0057955533,0.0007781663,0.00044688457,0.00028408045,0.70625275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8019172,0.001356345,0.052591912,0.0653568,0.0015716257,0.0010833372,0.00020379556,0.000081707,0.0758372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9782639,0.0077186287,0.0011939146,0.0024206452,0.006451017,0.0039519514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874681,0.0074030906,0.001276818,0.0008289134,0.002384291,0.00063861546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0155938035,0.0004888002,0.0006346651,0.0019384974,0.00636285,0.008987191,0.0037670902,0.011989505,0.00338143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020279447,0.0004527045,0.001712674,0.0011786186,0.022451641,0.0042049265,0.004333973,0.0128237,0.0007204016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047674453,0.000014774752,0.0002912711,0.000012876695,0.0000024131543,0.000060122155,0.0017301465,0.000133346,0.0001091213,0.9919912,0.0036295578,0.002020494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052033236,0.00019905712,0.005631706,0.00056176685,0.000051019128,0.00044359834,0.0036082643,0.0015653544,0.0013577726,0.6535163,0.33279684,0.00021629916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070389934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.101030864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9296101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013738728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030134505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13996041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909513918","doi":"10.7202/1055260ar","title":"Spousal Support in Quebec: Resisting the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Antipathy; Jurisdiction; Family law; Legislature; Law; Political science; Child support; Advisory committee; Autonomy; Legislation; Politics; Public administration","score_opus":0.024794405877916738,"score_gpt":0.30441301151174965,"score_spread":0.2796186056338329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909513918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5353749,0.009732545,0.0023637246,0.2632871,0.0007060295,0.00015681877,0.00059492525,0.00009518853,0.1876888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9485913,0.002515761,0.000882711,0.02049293,0.00006841913,0.000043005522,0.00008891511,0.000019757057,0.027297327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610364,0.0009917882,0.00012812953,0.00032555303,0.0013128694,0.0011380921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98828053,0.0037836418,0.00076025794,0.00040095916,0.0049427003,0.0018319037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005459161,0.00018841692,0.0002774304,0.0014241956,0.022519605,0.0054975664,0.002109481,0.002641566,0.0039460217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0110766515,0.00035902724,0.0002678368,0.0019028046,0.0058315285,0.0014226055,0.0019421948,0.004151137,0.00018788323],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001133582,0.00018125735,0.115992144,0.00026811982,0.000069422,0.0033377965,0.18323049,0.0012368258,0.0016451755,0.37599742,0.1649896,0.15293837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057120156,0.000104182844,0.14791949,0.0007845328,0.00007462773,0.0006223685,0.08998681,0.0018707111,0.0010856142,0.007386493,0.74988735,0.00022071289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99592423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99868363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11084286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11084286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1503355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.804225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910137634","doi":"10.7202/1055256ar","title":"Rethinking the Role of Lawyers for Children : Child Representation in Canadian Family Relationship Cases","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; The King's University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Best interests; Presumption; Economic Justice; Welfare; Family law; Representation (politics); Law; Political science; Child protection; Psychology; Public relations; Business","score_opus":0.02003630692793654,"score_gpt":0.27703065880631134,"score_spread":0.25699435187837477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910137634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5397187,0.015835347,0.005219591,0.20920055,0.0008805981,0.000377904,0.00017336094,0.00008271191,0.22851124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97214824,0.0032503777,0.0020862017,0.014523092,0.00012906312,0.000072694515,0.000027411124,0.000032548847,0.0077304393],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94783145,0.017643092,0.0018308744,0.0028005417,0.016458794,0.013435104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94648784,0.031686015,0.003935191,0.0014187002,0.010190195,0.0062821717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04661699,0.00036443354,0.00055633544,0.005206818,0.03593962,0.014630772,0.0066662054,0.007231702,0.0034455473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0777107,0.00083356624,0.00052291446,0.005406336,0.027926126,0.0055167717,0.010853557,0.008666575,0.00021849545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061866645,0.00007108411,0.03326171,0.0003141569,0.000036661942,0.0028835821,0.5334893,0.00035540972,0.00084677694,0.32995737,0.021912666,0.076809496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000690109,0.00009253475,0.06937716,0.0023717568,0.00016253168,0.0016210807,0.5022581,0.0009227729,0.0013608661,0.015152582,0.40634546,0.00026607382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9564653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9838616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13102649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13102649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18777099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95066816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910244147","doi":"10.7202/1055259ar","title":"Recomposition familiale et multiparentalité : un exemple du difficile arrimage du droit à la famille contemporaine","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.011141911569283488,"score_gpt":0.24888406469075172,"score_spread":0.23774215312146824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910244147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58672297,0.005530201,0.010174555,0.010068626,0.00029738588,0.000023904891,0.00006486841,0.000054653337,0.3870628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97690547,0.0009560881,0.0009809196,0.00025434166,0.0000470636,0.000010321123,0.000014712244,0.000014517436,0.020816714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910957,0.000467148,0.000022606793,0.00012275527,0.00013469139,0.000143118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990707,0.00040723587,0.0001375219,0.00010878431,0.0001508783,0.00012488381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000927616,0.00021408667,0.00015980737,0.000800177,0.007906585,0.0026424509,0.0005491462,0.0008243341,0.005857442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020665487,0.00015759366,0.00013357583,0.0008962811,0.010386663,0.0020682525,0.002984656,0.0018832396,0.00035610102],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036401652,0.000017639493,0.0052788965,0.00003894642,0.0000055204437,0.0012734389,0.37763152,0.00014380859,0.0006126773,0.59000033,0.002468953,0.022491891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019462173,0.00008693326,0.023079626,0.0004507237,0.000031047628,0.0044500194,0.25134274,0.0006381852,0.0014319195,0.08586562,0.63254654,0.00005728697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051209025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09551488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051209025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033777438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026784076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1018219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910874826","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvb4btbx.6","title":"Canadian Constitution-Making in the British World","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"MQUP eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.03777690729711041,"score_gpt":0.2893359261344656,"score_spread":0.2515590188373552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910874826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04235722,0.0136505775,0.00063327944,0.02622275,0.0007945407,0.000037997237,0.0005015272,0.00008711068,0.9157148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5773397,0.009409395,0.0013458342,0.0042758803,0.00013615954,0.000039892107,0.0002428165,0.00015502065,0.40705526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700075,0.0004179721,0.00006475169,0.0002950594,0.0010979257,0.0011234542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977558,0.00052778254,0.000067253706,0.00010755468,0.0010914465,0.00045022258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017712151,0.00044316673,0.0004913047,0.002763749,0.030057797,0.011560956,0.001415328,0.0023376457,0.021105098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005105541,0.00040450905,0.00027146036,0.007039702,0.010045837,0.0025482567,0.002272162,0.004161657,0.0010650742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033258144,0.000018411523,0.0010286835,0.00008544204,0.00000984473,0.00021021298,0.020497197,0.00032248814,0.00012464343,0.8270603,0.11060831,0.040001225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008234689,0.000006640229,0.0059553464,0.00019108073,0.000013617811,0.00006625103,0.014051985,0.00020196858,0.00016478443,0.021007614,0.9582833,0.00004914975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8633933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13660668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14558512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99115545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911163197","doi":"","title":"Placing Vulnerability at the Centre of Section 15(1) of the Charter: A Case Comment on Inglis V British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Charter; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Section (typography); Law; Order (exchange); Vulnerability assessment; Political science; Public administration; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer security; Psychological resilience; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.059604692739547493,"score_gpt":0.2800088711088762,"score_spread":0.22040417836932868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911163197","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18213883,0.007833836,0.0023786563,0.51523197,0.001961936,0.00021495785,0.00033129528,0.000120677694,0.2897878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72467005,0.0021318712,0.0010587036,0.182009,0.00021833378,0.00010927308,0.00006790448,0.00005138571,0.08968356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886076,0.0021623939,0.00026863473,0.000889806,0.00336469,0.0047070156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950236,0.002651974,0.00022391314,0.00014719075,0.0011942508,0.00075902726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006051542,0.0006323255,0.0007125699,0.0012712023,0.05672798,0.011006042,0.004379556,0.022524029,0.0034193536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012383271,0.00082748244,0.0007455322,0.0022798162,0.018466499,0.0025846262,0.0052296603,0.023163782,0.0003685278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008435563,0.00006355934,0.00747572,0.00026517035,0.00002915233,0.008148757,0.16115133,0.0014598774,0.0015473852,0.5866736,0.20998254,0.023118528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000743257,0.00010220183,0.029957388,0.0015275249,0.00014687382,0.0015597948,0.2286497,0.0022039658,0.0020769765,0.047629435,0.6852935,0.00077831215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9860255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1105535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1105535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14364928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8021256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911580633","doi":"10.12783/dtssehs/meit2018/27668","title":"The Canadian School–A School in Sichuan for Missionaries’ Children","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DEStech Transactions on Social Science Education and Human Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Regret; Context (archaeology); School education; Political science; Geography; Pedagogy; Sociology; Archaeology; Law","score_opus":0.031070158470219968,"score_gpt":0.36525607024525436,"score_spread":0.33418591177503437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911580633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94285107,0.0019784407,0.0003875666,0.0021890008,0.00006793484,0.000060374285,0.00035272376,0.000029388992,0.052083552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986942,0.0004424067,0.00037549488,0.00017307827,0.0000072321805,0.000010169969,0.0001395205,0.0000061413443,0.011904059],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930906,0.00006622991,0.000008056937,0.00010252463,0.00011461831,0.00039950517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928445,0.000041584164,0.00006395589,0.000026604552,0.00022748148,0.00035593577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044521864,0.00024143595,0.00017460242,0.0016998678,0.021663597,0.001744447,0.00085985253,0.00048424632,0.005356153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000649784,0.00020090184,0.00017053439,0.0036517614,0.003141093,0.0005751114,0.0015766923,0.00073901744,0.00019284619],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033335653,0.0001914583,0.4349297,0.00033852184,0.00007214705,0.0075603733,0.28452915,0.00057199673,0.002727914,0.101836234,0.02207023,0.14483897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014368946,0.00009644366,0.5834701,0.00017414844,0.000033179138,0.0009291855,0.16785966,0.00020753524,0.00077182194,0.0013514116,0.24500619,0.000085980326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9762691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03497261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03497261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06903967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2537452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912807746","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.001.0001","title":"The Oxford Handbook of the Canadian Constitution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Federalism; Law; Political science; Charter; Indigenous; Constitutional law; Constitutional economics; Population; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03634714006224919,"score_gpt":0.25069199540549825,"score_spread":0.21434485534324904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912807746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031659214,0.065774664,0.0009116045,0.013013085,0.0034841995,0.000055406515,0.0017346718,0.00018380035,0.91452605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017846415,0.09248638,0.0034346383,0.0046739816,0.0014259107,0.00016065838,0.0030267434,0.00039546352,0.8765497],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974023,0.00024396759,0.000092831135,0.00021357807,0.0016791289,0.0003682346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797624,0.00033943838,0.000046546094,0.00017575597,0.0012640234,0.00019797425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015771337,0.000936874,0.00060151966,0.006490538,0.00847413,0.0080037555,0.0014887771,0.0019872058,0.077257685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00533451,0.0004548125,0.0003480331,0.0103762075,0.005531318,0.0033685248,0.0017592048,0.0030238403,0.012544087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047907797,0.000004247821,0.000052689156,0.00012618105,0.0000015688936,0.0000329467,0.00057896064,0.00016161059,0.000041639676,0.30520844,0.6497631,0.044023808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.614083e-7,4.2865977e-7,0.000065393804,0.00011031443,5.4828934e-7,0.00000810406,0.00007389869,0.0000086756945,0.000006839041,0.003338333,0.9963838,0.0000030247188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87269926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9033351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9282472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07175278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09450985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5206053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913281582","doi":"10.1177/0067205x1804600411","title":"The Dilemma of Indigenous Self-Government in Canada: Indigenous Rights and Canadian Federalism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Indigenous rights; Sovereignty; Federalism; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Constitution; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Dual federalism; Minority rights; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.015484743323703483,"score_gpt":0.26154858220707594,"score_spread":0.24606383888337247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913281582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07006546,0.20868795,0.0016337403,0.2987875,0.0010796577,0.000061320636,0.00049092853,0.0000434855,0.41914994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91375965,0.049114894,0.0009058876,0.016397482,0.00027917768,0.000027622067,0.00011277033,0.000016562377,0.019385915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99543977,0.0008552602,0.00009713347,0.0003073131,0.0019709864,0.0013293619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99445796,0.0019326673,0.00026627744,0.00018112261,0.0025261987,0.00063578045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004138112,0.00017083286,0.00043892776,0.0023105799,0.010678493,0.00703234,0.0017634378,0.0027538221,0.0038649016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007597606,0.00017965556,0.00028535438,0.0040451773,0.013877012,0.002051616,0.0017414851,0.0028558061,0.000117669166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019003375,0.000012277461,0.0014819829,0.00029446243,0.000021292028,0.00017034721,0.0049515152,0.000547464,0.00008871053,0.9382989,0.032153994,0.021960068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057178742,0.000028502678,0.02432741,0.0031953608,0.00014928041,0.00018984116,0.018750634,0.0012535601,0.0004288741,0.14859098,0.8029165,0.00011180533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9928444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.994618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12359313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12359313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21551485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89673513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913453585","doi":"10.7202/1055486ar","title":"Le droit de la Cour interaméricaine des droits de l’homme : une obligation moderne pour le Canada","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013669377107270739,"score_gpt":0.25463420145589477,"score_spread":0.24096482434862404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913453585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14821488,0.01119673,0.0059212516,0.11360453,0.00070820056,0.000080052545,0.0005553315,0.00009644078,0.7196226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.860078,0.0033289434,0.0021682808,0.007249603,0.00009848942,0.000034036933,0.000112553775,0.00006306107,0.126867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970214,0.000398006,0.00004834452,0.00029354595,0.0010781126,0.0011605916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732035,0.0003460334,0.000116953124,0.00011620268,0.0013039178,0.00079661264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017124687,0.00032158737,0.00035104682,0.0009289436,0.018585071,0.011867003,0.0014606884,0.0026846307,0.008524415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035921652,0.00029895492,0.00028120735,0.0016561277,0.013758687,0.0022378475,0.0032102223,0.0049608704,0.0004625954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030223968,0.00002069733,0.004328511,0.00006328993,0.0000144055575,0.00024683136,0.025446197,0.0005578479,0.00030832508,0.9225052,0.027155789,0.019322647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024996323,0.000024234985,0.019847715,0.0005260927,0.00003579264,0.00018794181,0.040930998,0.0010336416,0.00045910297,0.06647,0.87032855,0.00013090445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9892286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9935044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11108117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11108117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23022914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80595404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913495974","doi":"10.4324/9781315461731-26","title":"The ethics of indigenous rights","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Engineering; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.06743876809145344,"score_gpt":0.34281233481688855,"score_spread":0.2753735667254351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913495974","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007299504,0.009240814,0.0020760237,0.015749209,0.00030737932,0.0000212839,0.000029370127,0.000021428199,0.96525496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61881965,0.010452798,0.003129133,0.004747877,0.00029802934,0.000070932314,0.000037790032,0.00006558765,0.36237818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99649066,0.00085572066,0.00005075446,0.0002428596,0.0012956089,0.0010643706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991347,0.00029899593,0.00004588733,0.00009254612,0.00030244308,0.00012552192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020188438,0.00036701074,0.0003085098,0.00082005083,0.015913991,0.006896587,0.0012101878,0.0022628757,0.0040170564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023847986,0.00018394411,0.0002018142,0.0010557505,0.038444716,0.0026244174,0.0025902118,0.0035768747,0.00048648907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010892056,0.0000014890245,0.000049055874,0.000010369002,6.436047e-7,0.000038570186,0.007789929,0.0000490577,0.000027377913,0.9853086,0.003896495,0.0028273503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031778156,0.0000043482632,0.0006953414,0.00025286828,0.0000039813413,0.000118295415,0.010758115,0.00016717493,0.00013269107,0.19410813,0.793743,0.0000128017855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7644802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8192172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7644802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036681324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04511072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47381365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913857357","doi":"","title":"Le mariage des personnes de même sexe en droit constitutionnel comparé: Canada","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Annuaire international de justice constitutionnelle","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.015252291250486227,"score_gpt":0.2651851584211375,"score_spread":0.24993286717065127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913857357","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9646611,0.0036105854,0.00023083374,0.0066947364,0.00021830735,0.00003898854,0.0021401644,0.0000132586565,0.02239205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723273,0.002245663,0.00024422258,0.0008615848,0.000034462046,0.00003843148,0.0008274504,0.000022534945,0.023398433],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761707,0.0002385791,0.000072093826,0.0002744309,0.00066806184,0.0011298795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964277,0.0005195375,0.0003780384,0.000102959886,0.0015566626,0.0010150473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015152992,0.00028493328,0.00072086934,0.0027170544,0.015705109,0.005179401,0.0016713667,0.0016044443,0.007966324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065227156,0.0004091138,0.0007289047,0.0059484523,0.0027213944,0.0017904582,0.002491021,0.0034618508,0.00034282578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006209231,0.00028285093,0.68008,0.00023355662,0.00029495888,0.0009863321,0.15915252,0.00097300095,0.0007028905,0.04892428,0.031150585,0.07659809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043996995,0.00008110272,0.73031354,0.00035871638,0.0001074826,0.00030608257,0.19480681,0.00056119607,0.00043909662,0.0016171088,0.07123374,0.00013108196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99907035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078462906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.078462906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.099121235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5692909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914250502","doi":"10.15393/uchz.art.2019.271","title":"CANADIAN STRESS: FROM SPECIFICITY TO THE WHOLE LEXICON","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of Petrozavodsk State University","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexicon; Linguistics; Stress (linguistics); Natural language processing; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013701455003435978,"score_gpt":0.22535187664872544,"score_spread":0.21165042164528947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914250502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12008989,0.0028539994,0.013197075,0.010329041,0.00051443884,0.00008680228,0.00529119,0.0008424286,0.84679526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95521885,0.0017440541,0.004839959,0.0006803013,0.00016862163,0.000036254904,0.0030349058,0.0008976877,0.033379287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803764,0.00028771054,0.000100004865,0.0004648827,0.0007352231,0.0003745109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740183,0.0004889816,0.00010127857,0.00036068916,0.0014641915,0.00018299051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008878655,0.0008730611,0.0009742225,0.003731561,0.0068926564,0.01018202,0.0017098158,0.0013252023,0.025204549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068106856,0.0008077202,0.0003316844,0.0064028986,0.0063427337,0.007608767,0.0039882683,0.0027329547,0.0027423992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003627486,0.000037576574,0.011062232,0.0005611613,0.0000554563,0.0008200018,0.0669765,0.0006742708,0.007707059,0.6395315,0.09886058,0.17335089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005425202,0.000033545206,0.039696664,0.0006108419,0.00015062721,0.001107353,0.051708337,0.00317525,0.0047027436,0.17946512,0.7190298,0.00026540074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8831508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90555435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116849184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029009083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032995775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23507464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915998374","doi":"10.1017/cls.2019.1","title":"L’Esprit de l’ours contre la station de ski : l’argumentation juridique face à un conflit épistémologique et ontologique","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013675211598160132,"score_gpt":0.2810722004341452,"score_spread":0.26739698883598506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915998374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19450037,0.007106542,0.022649167,0.041176002,0.0007564813,0.000086820764,0.00028846046,0.00008253172,0.7333535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95147103,0.0016936747,0.0024081075,0.0010430563,0.00010176668,0.000037305716,0.000060708688,0.000055006705,0.043129414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546176,0.001823463,0.00011303845,0.00052317226,0.0014369116,0.0006416077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661535,0.0015616126,0.0003053591,0.00022308745,0.0009960122,0.00029855472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043204767,0.0005127936,0.0004670858,0.0023742667,0.0102052195,0.016140193,0.0013833664,0.0035409904,0.007260124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004478135,0.00031126596,0.000330267,0.002465708,0.03814732,0.005600296,0.0047680284,0.004613129,0.00073349103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019749377,0.0000060645407,0.0010781955,0.000057753216,0.000008092692,0.00017199703,0.051865127,0.00021145526,0.00028000583,0.9405644,0.0015797113,0.004157445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003351682,0.000030954445,0.010244554,0.0009943893,0.000057174435,0.00028274304,0.1678852,0.001543793,0.001530138,0.29970682,0.51757395,0.00011672687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3435983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40740076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6564017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032740112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028239844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68319666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918395108","doi":"10.7202/1056407ar","title":"Pour en finir avec la Proclamation royale : la décision Côté","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proclamation; Humanities; Jurisprudence; Ethnology; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.013841563639518656,"score_gpt":0.2702164604370313,"score_spread":0.25637489679751263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918395108","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25084552,0.010838152,0.010932172,0.10511652,0.0013669066,0.00014201425,0.00020226861,0.000060919356,0.6204955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8493176,0.001328613,0.0018541301,0.007764923,0.00011500582,0.000035537018,0.000029522984,0.00004747643,0.13950714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924856,0.0021211228,0.0001722982,0.0009367878,0.0023574226,0.0019268651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938759,0.0022670794,0.00045762776,0.00032910303,0.002362982,0.000707202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046717743,0.00034488642,0.000388831,0.0009663371,0.019548595,0.009955727,0.0014591633,0.0050855805,0.009424437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0107192835,0.0003023559,0.00050580985,0.001067355,0.015213454,0.0033606517,0.0029845012,0.0057450854,0.00066658383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056415185,0.000028435756,0.008283012,0.000111555055,0.000040198367,0.0015954582,0.063290425,0.0004467861,0.0011696569,0.87952095,0.02185915,0.02359795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026801872,0.00007549486,0.026317589,0.0004890265,0.000053776934,0.00062213547,0.053694457,0.0007553704,0.0015123921,0.046593677,0.8696853,0.0001739235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81792605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9307762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18207395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03967226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032966834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36629242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919044450","doi":"10.7202/1056273ar","title":"Couvrez cette communauté que je ne saurais voir: Equity and Fault in the Division of Quebec’s Family Patrimony","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Misconduct; Statutory law; Discretion; Equity (law); Political science; Family law; Civil code; Common law; Partition (number theory); Sociology","score_opus":0.030670574588543158,"score_gpt":0.3115800032532794,"score_spread":0.2809094286647362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919044450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.561622,0.00613631,0.0020563887,0.08787005,0.0002547384,0.000035099645,0.0002286788,0.000027981529,0.34176868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730416,0.00042817867,0.0001754492,0.0014583328,0.00001552236,0.0000058899386,0.000017060209,0.000005426087,0.024852542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892265,0.00028420473,0.0000146879065,0.00009077528,0.00024446857,0.0004432795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865425,0.00045833585,0.000111580586,0.00006495329,0.00049865036,0.00021217189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013379991,0.0001366109,0.00015756572,0.00061818206,0.013114129,0.005212225,0.0007592291,0.0015421411,0.00510473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003134329,0.00011624831,0.00015177809,0.0007812868,0.008306774,0.0018131359,0.0011936255,0.0015825906,0.0001891876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054654058,0.000043164717,0.035510555,0.000048477643,0.000018431352,0.00096245017,0.106952555,0.0007715408,0.0006009411,0.7738851,0.03478665,0.046365354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003415914,0.000083214574,0.18879859,0.00040840506,0.000044959404,0.0005794841,0.17723483,0.0024808466,0.0014206349,0.06742732,0.56135416,0.00013333309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9714155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98534113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041454263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041454263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027038665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30077314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919656641","doi":"","title":"The Legal Treatment of Informal Caregivers of the Elderly in Canada and Australia: The Importance of Recognizing Relations in Creating Reforms","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"BC Cancer Agency; Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; University of Oxford; Department of Health, Western Cape Government; University of Toronto; McMaster University","keywords":"Legislation; Autonomy; Government (linguistics); Focus group; Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Nursing; Economic growth; Medicine; Business; Law","score_opus":0.020394083833920038,"score_gpt":0.28592948170242427,"score_spread":0.2655353978685042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919656641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7268249,0.014872312,0.0013070524,0.13411614,0.00045988505,0.00020682653,0.0000664762,0.0000250472,0.12212129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809857,0.0064651356,0.0005726465,0.0050650206,0.00004350121,0.000050301667,0.00001824511,0.000008430916,0.006790981],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921829,0.0022699488,0.00020514653,0.00029796598,0.0020022402,0.0030419044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823918,0.0032683504,0.0015272371,0.000363881,0.006075552,0.0063732476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065571857,0.00023955254,0.00047308748,0.0015274645,0.028870981,0.006558341,0.001904634,0.0017932549,0.0019738832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023635248,0.00026375434,0.00021810165,0.0020007933,0.015809968,0.003278212,0.007859714,0.004274414,0.00011555735],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005555506,0.00018085926,0.045803074,0.0003267596,0.000021285352,0.0015176673,0.53990674,0.0007754037,0.00045233234,0.2752418,0.023382468,0.11233595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029374058,0.00006714952,0.09997234,0.0018032746,0.000037238075,0.00037679556,0.6509635,0.0009767137,0.0003584552,0.023235738,0.22207585,0.00010353987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98026687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9883083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12204632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12204632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3142406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8855122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921267321","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1366","title":"Recontextualizing Ktunaxa Nation v. British Columbia: Crown Land, History and Indigenous Religious Freedom","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Charter; Worship; Supreme court; Ceremony; State (computer science); Political science; Religious freedom; Law; Context (archaeology); Geography; Environmental ethics; Politics; Archaeology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03205819652791799,"score_gpt":0.274209235990027,"score_spread":0.242151039462109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921267321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23869564,0.009362286,0.00095236016,0.044931773,0.00053752674,0.00015359008,0.00034976265,0.000039505994,0.7049776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88681096,0.003369161,0.0004956376,0.023333708,0.00008844265,0.00009066841,0.0000949444,0.00001979924,0.08569672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743915,0.00036214307,0.000081914965,0.00025839027,0.00075860065,0.0010997112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974015,0.001184039,0.00012515728,0.00013182922,0.00078611285,0.00037127145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019989794,0.00029223974,0.00035632343,0.0015351985,0.019958002,0.009591959,0.001820963,0.005872369,0.0044490723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044104652,0.00041694797,0.00028748432,0.002030961,0.013160383,0.0023181648,0.0037911674,0.009355934,0.00031609286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047108988,0.000045139957,0.0076721394,0.00016251756,0.00002459775,0.002744521,0.030822642,0.00050858717,0.001174853,0.89109045,0.045687784,0.020019528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011841421,0.000082426806,0.04562541,0.0017055087,0.00018643442,0.00090879726,0.09518471,0.0012690466,0.0021992216,0.08164677,0.77073014,0.00034316233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9730022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042939052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042939052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.081779085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3115461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921568756","doi":"10.7202/1056928ar","title":"L’inscription tardive du nom du père présumé à l’acte de naissance : quelques hésitations quant à la voie procédurale à suivre","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032415549891295234,"score_gpt":0.2693365559931597,"score_spread":0.23692100610186445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921568756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10382076,0.0050701695,0.020875273,0.17095217,0.0015751179,0.00023569325,0.0003841817,0.00017324026,0.6969134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73618054,0.0014875628,0.0055844476,0.034857605,0.00035658054,0.00020486173,0.00009010551,0.000103500155,0.22113477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98987937,0.0034313444,0.0004143033,0.0015268754,0.0026899907,0.0020580771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897314,0.004641804,0.0006055151,0.0010042732,0.0031225653,0.0008944004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008487727,0.0005191606,0.0004255451,0.0007077085,0.013171685,0.006002668,0.0022498984,0.0072312746,0.007209188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017626438,0.00060377934,0.0005603144,0.0006554848,0.016466785,0.003966767,0.0037534751,0.00961593,0.0011325836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022693635,0.000014459552,0.0021465004,0.0000643513,0.000011419079,0.00030333822,0.03341128,0.00018457408,0.00065189844,0.92616236,0.026683163,0.010343972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031465243,0.00010260187,0.016472394,0.00061521097,0.000049081482,0.0004453546,0.026298363,0.0007543713,0.0018651362,0.07302252,0.880214,0.00012961411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62712204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79217714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62712204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024577623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043969575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7501478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921820358","doi":"10.21991/cf29376","title":"The Original Living Tree","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Supreme court; Constitutional interpretation; Doctrine; Order (exchange); Political science; Tree (set theory); Constitutional law; Judicial interpretation; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02095871892531076,"score_gpt":0.28926106029253557,"score_spread":0.2683023413672248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921820358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005613753,0.0031034483,0.00800468,0.022477547,0.0013804458,0.000062553656,0.00049122254,0.000114819864,0.9587515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34822935,0.003974394,0.008304843,0.018213993,0.00083709275,0.000133029,0.00057070074,0.00033501934,0.6194016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957279,0.00055988674,0.000102184604,0.00077456626,0.0019099857,0.00092547975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973864,0.00045482648,0.000079692785,0.0004043068,0.0013035161,0.00037136656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024958053,0.00043649666,0.00037461755,0.0013404238,0.011308405,0.0074427063,0.0015220839,0.0030670522,0.019790625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064299665,0.00028461724,0.0004339348,0.0019183524,0.017812312,0.004150467,0.0035131576,0.005949295,0.0027188836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004169515,0.0000020062637,0.00008702849,0.0000096913245,0.0000011289205,0.000026148167,0.0008114532,0.00003876393,0.00003873551,0.9713576,0.022524409,0.0050990055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007844582,0.000006360217,0.0004972112,0.00008678339,0.0000070263077,0.00008900949,0.00073402683,0.00023213368,0.00015830866,0.14264259,0.855521,0.000017734184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5986762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6680131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5986762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027605314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038666107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80737454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921868025","doi":"","title":"Arguing Indigenous Rights Outside Section 35: Can Religious Freedom Ground Indigenous Land Rights, and What Else Lies Ahead?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Supreme court; Law; Indigenous rights; Political science; Land rights; Right to property; Freedom of religion; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Sociology; Ethnology","score_opus":0.009783374898187302,"score_gpt":0.262680931211255,"score_spread":0.2528975563130677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921868025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2521003,0.0025695032,0.0031978078,0.12910116,0.00045451635,0.00006982456,0.0001748614,0.00003018228,0.6123018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95581186,0.00060053373,0.00081809075,0.019380253,0.00008958047,0.000017265465,0.000038574773,0.000016048369,0.023227964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99395305,0.0009710595,0.0001249591,0.00058099825,0.0017410137,0.002628777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99528944,0.0021858872,0.00034444235,0.00025101492,0.0012849653,0.0006443072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00605032,0.00026946733,0.00045927352,0.00085507653,0.016605694,0.008912537,0.0020478277,0.0063879336,0.0049862335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010350734,0.0002862795,0.00058618095,0.0009953413,0.0408496,0.005372484,0.004025798,0.0076360684,0.00037549605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012491887,0.000014616699,0.0017393838,0.000027712691,0.000009948227,0.00037365087,0.03868238,0.000087271444,0.0003182958,0.9496719,0.005702418,0.0033598188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006194406,0.00004635853,0.021346968,0.00092007197,0.00011462319,0.00060013373,0.21974859,0.00094356725,0.0021960773,0.39654416,0.35726357,0.00021392693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8793614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.921757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8793614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032767396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0599296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24269813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922039987","doi":"10.15353/lsuj.v3i0.432","title":"Redefining “Family” and Reconstructing Child Custody in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Politics; Legislation; Restructuring; Political science; Norm (philosophy); Nuclear family; Law; Family values; Sociology","score_opus":0.028710988561841018,"score_gpt":0.28606093228499874,"score_spread":0.2573499437231577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922039987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49496078,0.027657064,0.006426395,0.12746865,0.0010701744,0.00016164384,0.0011662389,0.00016248385,0.34092662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9493292,0.0069262017,0.0025306775,0.0059893075,0.00004539388,0.000025110157,0.00017093611,0.00007669914,0.034906432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738806,0.00036092915,0.000062721396,0.0002452953,0.0006878547,0.0012551089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737954,0.0004105248,0.00012645072,0.00008311859,0.0010508642,0.00094950537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022757472,0.00024231183,0.0003054284,0.001842741,0.026682831,0.0066279704,0.0022841915,0.0016974743,0.0068594795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044681234,0.00039400128,0.00036300838,0.0028238734,0.010978444,0.0020715294,0.0047357827,0.0032453123,0.00019062386],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007133832,0.000036283476,0.031256706,0.00025698944,0.000038712802,0.0028994926,0.17159063,0.0021095132,0.0009480179,0.6421151,0.06417779,0.08449945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020174872,0.00003119716,0.06558439,0.00081130036,0.000069538255,0.00072105305,0.21378048,0.00219903,0.00086001743,0.025882572,0.68989486,0.00014549712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99819523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23017679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23017679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28153127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8928858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922135310","doi":"10.7202/1056820ar","title":"Divorcer et ne plus vouloir tenir lieu de père","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.01966394015669898,"score_gpt":0.2802877954028486,"score_spread":0.2606238552461496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922135310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34530875,0.0076374346,0.0036816103,0.12282945,0.00048315988,0.000067777,0.00041865953,0.000030621624,0.5195425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86544317,0.0036214367,0.0007159573,0.010121147,0.00009151637,0.000037287682,0.00008701255,0.000017641023,0.11986485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972765,0.00088751334,0.00009106763,0.0002708247,0.000646138,0.0008280269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728656,0.00056759734,0.0005266978,0.00023413812,0.00082991406,0.00055512035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025615066,0.00016571644,0.0002835331,0.0005886553,0.009154558,0.003905884,0.0009705533,0.001346974,0.012729849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060769343,0.00022261048,0.00022289062,0.0008501982,0.00632685,0.0023720926,0.0032122203,0.0028480375,0.0010181749],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046836518,0.00008405894,0.042105414,0.00016929473,0.00003446898,0.00056108524,0.09130214,0.00014757336,0.000581394,0.78591496,0.025741903,0.05331078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025460457,0.00007548239,0.079626486,0.0006407012,0.000038166654,0.0007679796,0.15408263,0.00026508805,0.0010167859,0.03835483,0.7250507,0.000055796252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4020373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63808894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4020373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008699726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02110375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79939437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922225905","doi":"","title":"LA COUR SUPREME DU CANADA ET LA TRADITION DU DROIT CIVIL","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Jurisprudence; Public law","score_opus":0.03181982028567717,"score_gpt":0.2732602105662148,"score_spread":0.24144039028053763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922225905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077513486,0.24533017,0.002366536,0.07196414,0.001200262,0.000029798462,0.0004621797,0.00006603743,0.60106736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87178206,0.058180105,0.0008322854,0.0052615833,0.0004717845,0.0000148438485,0.00014033631,0.00004124369,0.06327569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995514,0.00075634546,0.000071262,0.0003419014,0.0021958232,0.0011207447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946708,0.0017306226,0.00042920027,0.00012161126,0.002405937,0.00064171205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001949429,0.00026974134,0.0003775744,0.0034822458,0.013508351,0.009547763,0.0009508785,0.0018381202,0.0077730557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075393156,0.00024091559,0.00020101528,0.005898555,0.010721999,0.0020014837,0.0013159215,0.0028648516,0.0003683427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022335775,0.000011251502,0.0036074824,0.00019327819,0.000019966707,0.00032723605,0.011164615,0.00034519008,0.00018810268,0.90958107,0.027617801,0.04692158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013446936,0.000017379487,0.0265417,0.0008101578,0.000041157513,0.00022209345,0.009986689,0.0003133836,0.00027335214,0.03262388,0.9291032,0.00005355986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98608685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9927735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91571826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08428175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11604429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922453220","doi":"10.21991/cf29378","title":"The Constitution of Canada as Supreme Law: A New Definition","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.024256995596565196,"score_gpt":0.26270637281413517,"score_spread":0.23844937721756998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922453220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018506939,0.01887201,0.04708224,0.092759825,0.0040718624,0.00024398761,0.0017600295,0.00025829452,0.81644464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7661638,0.018606247,0.075724706,0.024152976,0.0023956296,0.0005942424,0.001795763,0.00034168354,0.110225074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99407333,0.00095037353,0.00020288666,0.0007765997,0.0028128575,0.001183946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99652207,0.0006198421,0.0001570071,0.00025230128,0.0020186605,0.00043009777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032615284,0.00059112575,0.000825567,0.0057835933,0.011931117,0.015030998,0.00279216,0.0032283573,0.0050633606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005296353,0.0004214427,0.00051962375,0.0072223553,0.032296803,0.005477485,0.0033065937,0.0069524287,0.0004738834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.589091e-7,0.0000012155351,0.00007082099,0.000007940955,8.251608e-7,0.000016261245,0.0006388093,0.00007268524,0.000029222327,0.9939322,0.0037793394,0.0014496954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000156088,0.0000060865855,0.0015208756,0.00020725104,0.000014481354,0.00009008658,0.0019794023,0.0011312615,0.00013843154,0.30253536,0.6923093,0.00005183045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9123327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92006135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08766729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07625334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10136252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55325925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922454360","doi":"","title":"Finding Solutions for the Legislative Gaps in Determining Rights to the Family Home on Colonially Defined Indigenous Lands","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freehold; Indigenous; Legislation; Legislature; Land rights; Land tenure; Land law; Law; Family law; Political science; Geography; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Environmental planning; Ecology","score_opus":0.11302889733125822,"score_gpt":0.3251509411412067,"score_spread":0.21212204380994848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922454360","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23958354,0.005878103,0.015194252,0.5884155,0.0008593767,0.00040044618,0.0003061729,0.00006880788,0.14929372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94917923,0.0025991192,0.012362233,0.020702993,0.00017340959,0.00027022578,0.00014539741,0.000053226653,0.0145140905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807521,0.0074170753,0.001185611,0.0016226242,0.0035622218,0.0054603023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9402007,0.038577918,0.004036512,0.0028183698,0.010883549,0.0034828982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035427812,0.00025451384,0.00072905223,0.0021901596,0.02492309,0.011272178,0.0044105216,0.00762598,0.0054918965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07512851,0.000787496,0.00048885634,0.0036962563,0.031092802,0.01105593,0.009039622,0.011359288,0.00032114494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002879419,0.000046787794,0.0075466726,0.00024955123,0.000011442936,0.0006713487,0.14527184,0.000557656,0.0003831314,0.80452836,0.012569166,0.028135292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003566853,0.000031813866,0.016722437,0.0021163207,0.000038884264,0.00034541285,0.6082648,0.0011012428,0.0009922748,0.1843414,0.18590908,0.00010061774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6472539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78375375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6472539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052661102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14714535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70964706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922812838","doi":"","title":"LE DROIT A L'EGALITE: INTERFACE ENTRE DROITS INDIVIDUELS ET DROITS COLLECTIFS","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Context (archaeology); Democracy; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Constitutional court; Balance (ability); Sociology; Human rights; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.024654759271849094,"score_gpt":0.29872499166880034,"score_spread":0.2740702323969513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922812838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048172507,0.008269745,0.007342504,0.013691158,0.00018225679,0.000045375346,0.00016527482,0.000039637514,0.92209154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9231092,0.0045450237,0.0026849455,0.0022138099,0.00015880454,0.000063554326,0.00007820156,0.00008390387,0.06706248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994856,0.0020946073,0.000091892485,0.000416705,0.0014103047,0.0011304539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979069,0.0012930577,0.00015717371,0.00008903525,0.00032136575,0.00023260205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036547277,0.000542537,0.00056745444,0.0028525465,0.011483018,0.024059497,0.0013199389,0.0029271494,0.015258248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039506573,0.00039643876,0.0006497177,0.00509954,0.02329683,0.011452531,0.0079153795,0.0043893866,0.00081150903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008228894,0.0000051209645,0.0006455467,0.000024214063,0.0000041987623,0.000107091764,0.022011442,0.00008338071,0.00006455236,0.97186035,0.0011764859,0.004009392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021726664,0.000026135549,0.00860918,0.0006526128,0.00003938271,0.0004097101,0.12506768,0.00051720126,0.0004929484,0.20482612,0.6592729,0.00006439639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4126805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5599311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5873195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02894128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02021052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8205569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2923593692","doi":"10.29173/alr2530","title":"Supreme Court of Canada Cases Strengthen Argument for Municipal Obligation to Discharge Duty to Consult: Time to Put Neskonlith to Rest","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"First Quantum Minerals (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Indigenous; Treaty; Argument (complex analysis); Supreme court; Duty; Obligation; Rest (music); Government (linguistics); Abandonment (legal); Political science; High Court","score_opus":0.03251796229619488,"score_gpt":0.31378313895966287,"score_spread":0.281265176663468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2923593692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060501125,0.0100623965,0.0015084082,0.27495068,0.0015383819,0.00019345779,0.0012476488,0.00013196537,0.6498659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60080427,0.0063996944,0.00195875,0.23376839,0.00072395586,0.00021917783,0.00055741804,0.000109855115,0.15545848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98742306,0.0012816188,0.00041590416,0.0011521975,0.004791794,0.0049355137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98342067,0.0064770584,0.00062693504,0.00075507176,0.006756997,0.0019632466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007335475,0.00043613586,0.0007475979,0.002468792,0.027451398,0.013491611,0.00465839,0.019596277,0.008602586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023084221,0.00094249385,0.00089907023,0.003682268,0.013502068,0.0033421428,0.0038889642,0.014462641,0.0010457968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044654873,0.000046327474,0.003968463,0.00014849553,0.000047721456,0.001040702,0.0058839684,0.00044395446,0.0003307273,0.7470245,0.23165785,0.009362674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017562138,0.00003607152,0.021257007,0.0011996365,0.00028839652,0.0003743189,0.013654632,0.000954739,0.0008481273,0.06492196,0.8960758,0.0002137107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97869146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9894112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079532385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.079532385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23667096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57705057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2924529733","doi":"","title":"Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench Rule 20A: history of the law regarding civil money judgment and mortgage enforcement","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Mspace (University of Manitoba)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Queen (butterfly); Political science; Law enforcement; Enforcement; Summary judgment; Economics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.024856404077907342,"score_gpt":0.22467195483878608,"score_spread":0.19981555076087873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2924529733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.893721,0.007512937,0.00047097055,0.01711613,0.000120877296,0.00013604813,0.00067705923,0.000017654906,0.08022731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9570447,0.004358179,0.0005427647,0.00196487,0.000042535958,0.00009676639,0.00022693948,0.000014652837,0.03570845],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979113,0.00049577403,0.000060446644,0.00022937458,0.0005541268,0.0007490381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920506,0.0032229992,0.0011442603,0.00025362748,0.0022495957,0.0010788753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002164806,0.00013420396,0.00024702316,0.0024640404,0.011828578,0.0052797887,0.0015148888,0.0011448015,0.0053340592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072602206,0.0006086668,0.0001488663,0.005820735,0.0065399343,0.0016420246,0.0021711767,0.0021614393,0.00034654338],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019854828,0.0003226047,0.40948504,0.00053555355,0.00008770028,0.0035068826,0.28588808,0.001056462,0.0029270852,0.1684707,0.034766015,0.09275531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013478969,0.000053357402,0.69195575,0.0006723638,0.000026400938,0.0002619963,0.14850712,0.0003668892,0.000660892,0.0021078733,0.15530843,0.00006550792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9544268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9888494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07729124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07729124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09274662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5607898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2925102901","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1344","title":"Constitutional Cases 2016: An Overview","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Constitution; Constitutional law; Political science; Law; Constitutional court; Supreme Court Decisions; Set (abstract data type); Constitutional right; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.18330509882943144,"score_gpt":0.4246887779126451,"score_spread":0.24138367908321365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2925102901","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003858497,0.6607501,0.0026633546,0.049134236,0.014795264,0.000162044,0.0017271593,0.00018861613,0.2667208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04482353,0.8055291,0.00423766,0.02015309,0.016306395,0.00031965808,0.0042425366,0.00045372304,0.10393428],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99253064,0.0009892453,0.0007836941,0.0006058645,0.0042177476,0.00087282027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993211,0.0027713594,0.0006405591,0.00035050622,0.0019345231,0.0010920647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006398632,0.000700391,0.00083813834,0.01768365,0.0055471673,0.012820905,0.00201558,0.004035091,0.015216983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010349825,0.0011638209,0.00085596024,0.024974674,0.005800552,0.011518015,0.0049208854,0.0056764903,0.00486286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025233154,0.000077075354,0.0010504589,0.0019324885,0.000016210168,0.00030244893,0.0034359891,0.0005530852,0.0004940626,0.3108028,0.46437183,0.21693832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.431703e-7,0.000003764257,0.00058629306,0.0006086047,0.0000011354682,0.00005249073,0.0003152521,0.000020681213,0.000029402598,0.00350768,0.99486697,0.0000068152917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11959154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1745884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11959154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023302939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024783831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23779088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2932821575","doi":"10.1353/esc.2001.0030","title":"Robert Browning’s Language by Donald S. Hair","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English studies in Canada","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Admiration; Context (archaeology); History; Pace; Sociology; Literature; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Art; Archaeology; Geography","score_opus":0.019334563051692306,"score_gpt":0.30129875263273576,"score_spread":0.28196418958104347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2932821575","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008018353,0.0919018,0.0012277052,0.06837904,0.01681442,0.00003332789,0.0006177715,0.00019017108,0.82003397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010179673,0.028750181,0.00052933494,0.010676251,0.0016234363,0.000040372695,0.0002828136,0.0002638306,0.94765407],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939215,0.00012756526,0.000024788544,0.000117618205,0.00024243839,0.000095432246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995671,0.00013292771,0.0000235969,0.000042031814,0.00015817351,0.00007623022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007510416,0.00062026683,0.00038556557,0.0010447382,0.0035249656,0.005442346,0.0008042265,0.0016795989,0.06349198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017949868,0.00034226978,0.00018697018,0.0018677348,0.0026060008,0.0031833716,0.0017388767,0.0030215096,0.022717733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051226093,0.0000050896424,0.000038493876,0.00003109609,9.2279936e-7,0.000027527547,0.0006059597,0.000016414813,0.00004803615,0.0681969,0.91454667,0.016477859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.938181e-7,3.669896e-7,0.00003099938,0.000036369882,1.3953392e-7,0.000012375586,0.00009810162,0.0000033456283,0.000008909424,0.0009006969,0.99890757,8.0448683e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054423004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11332773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06349198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038795497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2124018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936681040","doi":"","title":"The Call in Carter to Interpret Freedom of Conscience","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Charter; Law; Dignity; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Political science; Freedom of religion; Scholarship; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.011397055751235485,"score_gpt":0.30487327066428727,"score_spread":0.29347621491305176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936681040","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054206694,0.020356825,0.005432705,0.7630233,0.008645662,0.00004607685,0.00022328648,0.00008768584,0.19676372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32864293,0.007769982,0.0037002373,0.589661,0.007057061,0.00010607319,0.00016045467,0.00025495526,0.06264729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801615,0.0070647537,0.0004955506,0.0019841199,0.005874925,0.0044191764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883497,0.0063464884,0.00053522387,0.0006159531,0.00283896,0.0013135759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013196773,0.00070773036,0.00079071015,0.002071832,0.019388314,0.014427023,0.003571987,0.017320331,0.004602338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026426967,0.0004986996,0.0008144039,0.0022720497,0.079861626,0.011306998,0.0073096803,0.025223078,0.00084493984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008440881,0.0000037698478,0.0001791946,0.00002554854,0.000001918532,0.000073489995,0.0052631795,0.000055816232,0.000029026176,0.89048773,0.09986236,0.004009551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000188121,0.000008662298,0.00067158765,0.0005782346,0.000009211651,0.00012084197,0.00614036,0.00021228338,0.00015054725,0.2793793,0.7126354,0.000074764845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7054563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.710762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7054563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05708223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057517678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5925566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2937180997","doi":"","title":"SECTION 9 AND SECOND FAMILIES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Underemployment; Spouse; Section (typography); Unemployment; Argument (complex analysis); Relevance (law); Scale (ratio); Child support; Economics; Sociology; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Public economics; Political science; Law; Economic growth; Business; Geography; Medicine","score_opus":0.0689438864642507,"score_gpt":0.3153809800479768,"score_spread":0.24643709358372612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2937180997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013274019,0.097462796,0.0024353415,0.24066702,0.007898251,0.00014624135,0.00046439475,0.00010538776,0.63754654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4419267,0.05443926,0.0034721508,0.2809314,0.0030539222,0.00028253903,0.00042668547,0.0001487986,0.21531855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806942,0.0025161724,0.0006456647,0.0017853753,0.008836197,0.0055223573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898365,0.0031657924,0.0006275728,0.00064490637,0.004739473,0.00098563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009494965,0.00047004188,0.0005940036,0.0025884495,0.02051094,0.007904509,0.0033643367,0.011338588,0.007393857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017605305,0.00044823057,0.0007509313,0.0025315003,0.017368201,0.0031277195,0.0036211917,0.009531385,0.00076145027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059800363,0.000007829754,0.0007049008,0.00011162801,0.000005284878,0.00030228787,0.006931453,0.0000675701,0.00008389585,0.8695176,0.105118,0.017143564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051993293,0.0000082204115,0.0025001578,0.0008611029,0.0000121441635,0.00028335553,0.0033443286,0.000039991613,0.0000996789,0.014450622,0.9783564,0.000038727023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95023954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94147485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054827016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054827016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13631178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39779973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2938056349","doi":"10.1515/9780773597549-006","title":"The Royal Proclamation of 1763 and the Aboriginal Constitution","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proclamation; Constitution; Honour; Parallels; Law; Supreme court; Political science; History; Engineering","score_opus":0.023020691083907436,"score_gpt":0.25649377859793615,"score_spread":0.2334730875140287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2938056349","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022402592,0.01924284,0.000766178,0.017210895,0.0007601438,0.000028036478,0.000090820606,0.000022642833,0.93947595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57823914,0.00847038,0.0013008511,0.012282788,0.0003718668,0.00007177028,0.00008264664,0.00005950079,0.39912102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837106,0.0003634971,0.000025184241,0.00013246412,0.0005263577,0.0005813926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995327,0.0001463717,0.000050986513,0.000042348547,0.00015835253,0.00006930483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013103386,0.00034428865,0.0001901934,0.0006924434,0.011926535,0.0030892468,0.00091200136,0.0027604734,0.0035594434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002038694,0.00022510212,0.0002491976,0.0012813958,0.015110128,0.0012235233,0.0018686674,0.0046130763,0.00063967105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010109793,0.0000045296656,0.0001983168,0.000024139896,0.0000023768123,0.00012632174,0.014677343,0.00007515974,0.00011016109,0.95245075,0.026578192,0.005742541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010254155,0.000009860253,0.002359772,0.00019013687,0.000008029381,0.00014383759,0.0045557716,0.00006486799,0.00030461367,0.053197194,0.9391317,0.00002392328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6802957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80171144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3197043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029539127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04298941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6431742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2938869735","doi":"10.7202/1058571ar","title":"Le calcul des aliments du parent de fait : de l’approche synchronique à l’approche étapiste","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016397984078295312,"score_gpt":0.25904316333735866,"score_spread":0.24264517925906334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2938869735","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12405444,0.0011715846,0.8438858,0.0009779218,0.00025645777,0.00034629082,0.0011494944,0.0022652566,0.025892803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4092492,0.0007342968,0.5627865,0.00021187385,0.00007603839,0.00035279407,0.001435277,0.00084963144,0.024304358],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728966,0.0005947235,0.0001255952,0.0006625263,0.0010410652,0.00028649837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949896,0.0017227096,0.00033245608,0.0010534092,0.0017145056,0.00018725819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028238182,0.0010500791,0.00095713435,0.0018408939,0.00158526,0.0042239293,0.002019033,0.0010528644,0.011632221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011372314,0.0007737483,0.0015006578,0.0024328644,0.0013510609,0.0029120953,0.0022070063,0.001891871,0.0019470461],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096552947,0.00021625803,0.055217605,0.0010366791,0.00040067168,0.00077118183,0.0051354393,0.28841212,0.015426561,0.19280674,0.009508435,0.43010285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002656764,0.0003859482,0.033361398,0.00062840583,0.00038164385,0.0005950455,0.0031964662,0.67268634,0.027411938,0.099952,0.1608773,0.0002577829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17096773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17383243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17096773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004185953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008808874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3399452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939088570","doi":"","title":"A Conversation with the Honorable Rosalie Silberman Abella and Dean Matthew Diller","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem; University of Toronto; Gruber Foundation; Northwestern University","keywords":"Conversation; Shalom; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Psychology; Art; Political science; Theology; Philosophy; Communication","score_opus":0.016965320891882168,"score_gpt":0.26746028534572075,"score_spread":0.25049496445383856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2939088570","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012747734,0.009356362,0.00026212627,0.94915587,0.02842918,0.00001782399,0.000058568938,0.00006602475,0.011379185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023951005,0.0065218015,0.0005176604,0.862505,0.014290915,0.00007716799,0.000051293162,0.0001866765,0.091898404],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995048,0.0018566023,0.00012769442,0.0006256842,0.001374292,0.00096761226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98982227,0.0023175736,0.0005473205,0.00024278679,0.00212628,0.004943839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050061042,0.0009049006,0.0011675417,0.0011660124,0.023873352,0.008856613,0.0019156055,0.009808478,0.016716754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021354055,0.000874356,0.00067183597,0.0011100961,0.0068771825,0.009288956,0.00556,0.02823179,0.006482957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067249503,0.000009395119,0.00013182462,0.000023043094,0.0000019122635,0.00009280241,0.004215671,0.000004707065,0.000055014607,0.0021898008,0.9905059,0.0027633011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029702417,0.000009136747,0.0003560494,0.00009471064,0.0000022653824,0.00012626838,0.012313959,0.000017700599,0.000058986294,0.000677721,0.98631823,0.000022017639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05949632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1103669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05949632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009741126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01194242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11830002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939799394","doi":"","title":"Famille structurelle, famille fonctionnelle : réflexion sur le travail prétorien d'adaptation de la notion de famille à travers la jurisprudence de la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme et de la Cour suprême du Canada","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Toulouse 1 Capitole Publications (Université Toulouse I Capitole)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009798009667018331,"score_gpt":0.24437996439636223,"score_spread":0.2345819547293439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2939799394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33212444,0.023442399,0.013047648,0.0923375,0.00043774254,0.000049561277,0.00018284003,0.000059098173,0.5383189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907685,0.0017392166,0.00069587305,0.0009270931,0.000040072715,0.000013223376,0.000015747013,0.000016907958,0.0057834755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965624,0.0019460358,0.000047623304,0.00031049672,0.0004962784,0.0006371973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99479055,0.002467808,0.00040758986,0.0002604481,0.0012508701,0.00082270824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059104944,0.00032784799,0.0003951506,0.0017612593,0.0115878275,0.0076190033,0.0013162883,0.0016364462,0.004588773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065669953,0.00017517507,0.00023876516,0.0018789629,0.03397876,0.005428411,0.004097792,0.0025573557,0.00020028217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020071617,0.000012705125,0.004166312,0.00003829875,0.0000074883014,0.00026841866,0.1786951,0.00015992808,0.0001399145,0.7983098,0.004585514,0.013596317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020293362,0.00003966463,0.059179228,0.001243013,0.00003216664,0.0006806383,0.46012047,0.0008207858,0.0004969196,0.1881205,0.28917554,0.000070832684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4715379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59179264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5284621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028879464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02707853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9375865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940980653","doi":"","title":"MAID in Canada?: Debating the Constitutionality of Canada’s New Medical Assistance in Dying Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Supreme court; Parliament; Political science; Legislature; Criminal law; Criminal code; Constitutional law; Constitutional court; Framing (construction); Context (archaeology); Constitution; Sociology; Politics; History","score_opus":0.016702537314955784,"score_gpt":0.28463357430374125,"score_spread":0.26793103698878545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940980653","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08459948,0.021459283,0.0041773613,0.4584274,0.0016818647,0.00011865314,0.0005414216,0.00009117159,0.42890343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8979766,0.0066782716,0.0027974122,0.06158006,0.00034251885,0.00006372016,0.00010642256,0.00006228773,0.03039271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98770547,0.0021159537,0.000336225,0.0011956411,0.0043090475,0.0043376037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98729414,0.0064150346,0.0004608889,0.0003966981,0.0036686112,0.0017646141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010369767,0.0004446007,0.00069408416,0.0025522497,0.031744335,0.01965861,0.0036225736,0.009089958,0.005366922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021385428,0.0006594782,0.0007370692,0.0031199611,0.037847158,0.0048434646,0.0059908694,0.0124883875,0.00022919006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012960942,0.000005496131,0.0008158126,0.00005974675,0.000008682524,0.00021948945,0.009296769,0.0002754309,0.00012920653,0.9703185,0.0138916755,0.0049661295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008448447,0.00003936765,0.011666893,0.001347425,0.00015901974,0.00031172283,0.03662385,0.002421152,0.001049184,0.20336585,0.74247646,0.0004545708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99225664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2502351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2502351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30803683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.869621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941032125","doi":"10.29173/psur77","title":"The Duty Consult as the Authority to Recognize","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Undergraduate Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Treaty; Sovereignty; Presumption; Duty; Law; Political science; Mandate; Federalist; Politics; State (computer science); Territorial integrity; Indigenous rights; Power (physics); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05269967748426617,"score_gpt":0.3927453424956485,"score_spread":0.34004566501138234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941032125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062628896,0.23757729,0.0074391947,0.11493889,0.0019211908,0.0000828226,0.00005925011,0.00004055516,0.631678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6040892,0.19298711,0.005661089,0.09660254,0.00241067,0.00018884294,0.00010485473,0.000053131505,0.09790257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98711956,0.005099783,0.0003928278,0.00068108016,0.0053668492,0.0013399746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928837,0.0043383213,0.00059066754,0.00041569234,0.0014104017,0.00036127516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009484334,0.00024358934,0.00057573256,0.0017896685,0.004935542,0.007816133,0.0019423104,0.006395889,0.0033217648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012331756,0.00028486727,0.00041858494,0.0018045651,0.026741711,0.007395799,0.003443552,0.0058977157,0.00059777504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030201884,0.0000050936455,0.00006829628,0.0001740826,0.0000034105078,0.00003635066,0.0019257074,0.000056212855,0.00005145754,0.9765356,0.009109706,0.01203099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009395984,0.000020023921,0.00060270657,0.0015262756,0.000019664247,0.0001915192,0.0024308658,0.00009807737,0.00020608613,0.16002919,0.834846,0.000020123814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20018907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23962142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20018907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020207101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058586597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39804763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941607365","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1347","title":"Daniels v. Canada: Reflections on Constitutional Technique","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Supreme court; Constitution; Law; Originalism; Certainty; Constitutional interpretation; Constitutional law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10593349318229006,"score_gpt":0.3992322901122735,"score_spread":0.29329879692998345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941607365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016824303,0.034558237,0.0102633415,0.26218286,0.0028156603,0.00015413713,0.0005587129,0.000120917866,0.6725218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7705462,0.02508995,0.012187299,0.10108889,0.0022456325,0.00036295087,0.0003133051,0.00020986742,0.08795596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9680244,0.008518528,0.0010006885,0.0035109872,0.012702868,0.006242528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867077,0.008141515,0.000433342,0.0007659503,0.0032551198,0.0006964061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021811312,0.0007086847,0.0010606722,0.006057281,0.030224165,0.020238975,0.0067252824,0.012335433,0.0053325924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033699796,0.0008206,0.0011832402,0.007577008,0.08470025,0.00728189,0.005367627,0.022625662,0.00052672677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027612978,0.000001823979,0.00006180768,0.000015613876,0.0000022224099,0.000033473534,0.0017078847,0.000056894154,0.000019885423,0.991531,0.0051720897,0.001394645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003640018,0.00001394706,0.0011323163,0.00066067674,0.0000345558,0.000115929666,0.008426739,0.00052318396,0.00037497166,0.5344264,0.45416015,0.00009459954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9418102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.943904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17307416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17307416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17415564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95911676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942669476","doi":"10.7202/1058513ar","title":"La dévolution légale des successions selon le Code civil du Québec","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018245885679092053,"score_gpt":0.2628403857381496,"score_spread":0.24459450005905756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942669476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5893678,0.004619581,0.0033055362,0.020515766,0.0002538269,0.00011953645,0.00035582084,0.000035858164,0.38142627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9305757,0.0006886693,0.00056175236,0.00065366144,0.00002334019,0.000023641907,0.00005987198,0.000010121682,0.06740317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973149,0.00067332387,0.00006352656,0.00023220657,0.00066081213,0.0010553274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969025,0.00065382535,0.00028115636,0.00017866187,0.0013436009,0.00064019853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026764022,0.00019659348,0.00024018512,0.0013657205,0.011235382,0.0040500597,0.00081963564,0.0011749353,0.0068248473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067795306,0.00019012214,0.00017715295,0.0017449405,0.0072308294,0.0016463983,0.0021170054,0.0021156087,0.0002842449],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006474181,0.000063243635,0.020931197,0.00009003147,0.000018520135,0.00047432733,0.07522304,0.0009173104,0.00074465654,0.81758493,0.01691623,0.06697179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041129362,0.00009591643,0.21739109,0.00068928296,0.000026291003,0.00031516352,0.082156576,0.0022809128,0.0010331827,0.03162438,0.66423607,0.00011011019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9505816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97421366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05984423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05984423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06349214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942745695","doi":"","title":"L'UNION HOMOSEXUELLE ET LE CODE CIVIL DU QUEBEC: DE L'IGNORANCE A LA RECONNAISSANCE?","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Legislature; Ignorance; Silence; Political science; Law; Legislation; Civil law (Civil law); Civil liberties; Sociology; Public law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.053597448072913764,"score_gpt":0.2911875712746566,"score_spread":0.23759012320174283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942745695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057716377,0.17435415,0.0012119005,0.35806304,0.0022125405,0.0000353667,0.0003649011,0.000048907288,0.4059928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7714066,0.047506806,0.000810021,0.025797963,0.00072580046,0.000031517113,0.0001591378,0.000028314846,0.15353386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726045,0.0006037949,0.00004708119,0.00015544091,0.0011520206,0.0007812443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99686337,0.0007280882,0.00028229575,0.00011723513,0.0015332552,0.0004757642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020621272,0.0002269832,0.0003077099,0.0014139694,0.00929425,0.006369754,0.0010537273,0.002717167,0.008507271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054978584,0.00019744296,0.0001653356,0.0026029686,0.008066565,0.0021639904,0.00082983624,0.0024758454,0.0005099103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003172615,0.00004171899,0.0055104587,0.00025253763,0.000015225249,0.00032477695,0.017631305,0.00025810022,0.0002305013,0.6840529,0.17306826,0.11858251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011335356,0.000018920417,0.026714956,0.0008582701,0.000016717795,0.00015316546,0.017159566,0.00024735273,0.0001466298,0.015204701,0.93942565,0.000042782045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9865649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054451317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054451317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0948287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39507383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942848434","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1086","title":"Sovereignty and Canadian-Nigerian Human Rights Engagements: Some Theoretical Reflections","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Human rights; Power (physics); Politics; State (computer science); Political science; Popular sovereignty; Law; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Law and economics; Political economy","score_opus":0.03865991025708563,"score_gpt":0.35197166543502506,"score_spread":0.3133117551779394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942848434","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16501723,0.08703483,0.002461692,0.1450246,0.0007050233,0.00009178004,0.00013663636,0.000017869932,0.59951025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9483501,0.028550223,0.00086315355,0.003859645,0.00008977615,0.000044460176,0.000037395686,0.000013439588,0.018191755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995447,0.0016701794,0.000113496615,0.0003544881,0.0009116605,0.0015031766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946743,0.0035164854,0.00031421444,0.00011184702,0.0009317381,0.00045136956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006642129,0.0004673866,0.00054749753,0.0030888724,0.022148354,0.0128844725,0.0012998891,0.003619014,0.004864148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059212684,0.00031289313,0.00030672492,0.006662623,0.026561158,0.00596933,0.005464123,0.005187166,0.00015222073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007242897,0.000011417216,0.0008463688,0.00013823641,0.0000025680883,0.00034797136,0.12636164,0.0001386691,0.00006224817,0.86100394,0.003001004,0.008078761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000105392655,0.000015710157,0.0055765645,0.0025525468,0.00001815023,0.00035530547,0.53881836,0.00053205324,0.00023957495,0.07435299,0.37747428,0.000053859527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9454572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10141902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10141902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08602833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7358499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943177021","doi":"10.7202/1058486ar","title":"La jouissance et l’exercice des droits civils : nouvelle version","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.016932783130279707,"score_gpt":0.2728444298784215,"score_spread":0.2559116467481418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943177021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19936804,0.036017593,0.0050570644,0.05888841,0.0009300016,0.00008251971,0.00064916996,0.00006185182,0.69894534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8776704,0.0072691888,0.0010897577,0.003984648,0.00020000186,0.000056406334,0.00014038272,0.000047761037,0.10954144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728763,0.00084846263,0.000121147656,0.0003523415,0.00084932847,0.00054107653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99721897,0.0010467526,0.00028308324,0.00031851252,0.0009266292,0.0002060274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022595688,0.0003423754,0.00032824549,0.00140183,0.005495278,0.0065045464,0.0009242138,0.0024134228,0.0076363827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048072585,0.000214932,0.0003557505,0.0017438527,0.019759089,0.0032660242,0.0023485469,0.0034865988,0.0006463511],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002858979,0.000024158782,0.0036309578,0.00018420821,0.000016559461,0.00021682792,0.11163277,0.00018660369,0.00036925764,0.84391314,0.012518187,0.027278854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016147342,0.000049807426,0.040117472,0.0011332583,0.00003628412,0.0002997091,0.04878276,0.0003152568,0.00067310856,0.038292464,0.87021095,0.00007281056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60949695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59454393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60949695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019903887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018369703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7856056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943399140","doi":"10.7202/1058451ar","title":"Further Reflections on Spousal and Child Support After Pelech, Caron and Richardson","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Law; Premise; Certainty; Statute; Relevance (law); Diversity (politics); Child support; Trilogy; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; History; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01542281050107032,"score_gpt":0.2837914656036168,"score_spread":0.2683686551025465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943399140","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005789448,0.018631762,0.00050123065,0.9239671,0.0038584138,0.00003824479,0.000081247934,0.00000959795,0.047122955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21093924,0.03143631,0.0018965264,0.64395624,0.0086676,0.00023237724,0.00006550639,0.000100520985,0.10270575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917129,0.0044142837,0.00027556773,0.0010056457,0.0015639156,0.0010276666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98237777,0.014784065,0.00036740414,0.00027774143,0.0014296011,0.00076351257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010068016,0.00052395044,0.0009243164,0.0016489312,0.013221715,0.009958937,0.0027717364,0.01467655,0.0049544508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022276768,0.0005974857,0.0007472101,0.0023461361,0.017116953,0.0077565894,0.0028257002,0.016312514,0.0005837398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003457832,0.000057117268,0.0012596082,0.00016670373,0.000011877583,0.0016153451,0.057469938,0.000104710045,0.00016997091,0.50818217,0.41969034,0.011237572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020878979,0.000031678515,0.0021939385,0.0008231763,0.00001204063,0.00032047025,0.052374497,0.00015095329,0.00018669723,0.07282712,0.87098706,0.000071508635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11260937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2331403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11260937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011759996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010072708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22390783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943542755","doi":"10.7202/1057027ar","title":"Le rôle protectionniste du législateur et l’adoption internationale","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01909500925827328,"score_gpt":0.2574708705259144,"score_spread":0.2383758612676411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943542755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4961093,0.0060439454,0.0052487226,0.027631922,0.00032985103,0.00016627635,0.00034465635,0.00006160428,0.46406373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9521387,0.0016120144,0.0013703977,0.0026161983,0.000061477265,0.0000863436,0.0000944084,0.00003471475,0.041985773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885754,0.004486486,0.0002909319,0.00090049265,0.0028406363,0.0029060896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98428,0.0061469753,0.0018691294,0.00097483397,0.0050205206,0.0017085209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010500683,0.00023256772,0.00032224754,0.0014174087,0.006293092,0.0050098132,0.00096390134,0.001365249,0.007310462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017000396,0.0003122828,0.0003802492,0.001622007,0.007682539,0.0021409967,0.0025150783,0.0034126786,0.0004752743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093828596,0.00013002906,0.063916676,0.00026206044,0.0000474719,0.0005614827,0.19775131,0.00038667224,0.0023180817,0.62659824,0.011245649,0.09668851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028642047,0.00023828082,0.31368786,0.0013871683,0.00006978684,0.0003422903,0.071839534,0.0004693762,0.0022739843,0.011661073,0.59789056,0.00011134997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44540423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5478332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44540423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018150093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02905301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8856234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943695129","doi":"","title":"ENFORCEABILITY OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RIGHTS IN THE WAKE OF GOSSELIN: ROOM FOR CAUTIOUS OPTIMISM","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Justiciability; Political science; Supreme court; Social rights; Context (archaeology); Optimism; Law; Human rights; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04081102600490723,"score_gpt":0.32143117250879294,"score_spread":0.2806201465038857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943695129","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009705272,0.014217414,0.0023156593,0.93799245,0.0019454577,0.000022492777,0.000033491935,0.000023247512,0.033744473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5498586,0.015761955,0.0053097536,0.40583622,0.0055878395,0.00007332443,0.000048999358,0.00012819022,0.017394993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96444106,0.011888517,0.0011474742,0.0034388495,0.011820618,0.007263442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9393907,0.040600304,0.0015189346,0.0025996952,0.011166976,0.0047233948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06463709,0.0005426084,0.0019405613,0.0017916834,0.019777717,0.024184378,0.0064704963,0.023618419,0.0030768143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06525381,0.00052701,0.0010487455,0.001898854,0.09238958,0.022721093,0.008677552,0.052378256,0.00040090314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002593742,0.000023714692,0.0003969663,0.000083025,0.00002231674,0.00015332301,0.008964114,0.00023746886,0.00012679362,0.9390389,0.04000318,0.010924218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047955935,0.000025342075,0.0015302376,0.0012848737,0.000044746244,0.0001540079,0.032898143,0.00057475246,0.00042162984,0.67106396,0.29178634,0.00016803216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5406718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6798665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45932817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043500613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11149386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9240665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943811979","doi":"10.7202/1058348ar","title":"Le droit au patrimoine familial et le droit à la succession : droits irréconciliables ?","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013423537783119596,"score_gpt":0.2627894625105487,"score_spread":0.24936592472742908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943811979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14142303,0.021246724,0.012776777,0.09262278,0.002117452,0.000041932424,0.00010810353,0.00006918507,0.729594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9327355,0.0041790996,0.0010202541,0.0026987984,0.0007822399,0.00004152173,0.000029654831,0.000051390907,0.058461595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980696,0.00090419024,0.000059684582,0.00031168544,0.00026526264,0.0003896053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862945,0.0005092766,0.00020921222,0.00021445988,0.0001951743,0.00024256615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017185637,0.0004737213,0.00034472812,0.0009664168,0.007907964,0.0055215615,0.0011101094,0.0019676809,0.00889178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054075974,0.00019274285,0.0003337325,0.0009891589,0.018642126,0.0052581006,0.0036549377,0.0027574834,0.0010404588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021757296,0.000008620459,0.00078839064,0.000042354128,0.0000035988955,0.00020804194,0.033721622,0.00006737348,0.00009607911,0.952889,0.0039796336,0.008173472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019427509,0.00005426918,0.006868572,0.0007061844,0.000018077302,0.0009155838,0.078303054,0.00059919944,0.00036701548,0.30997682,0.60213625,0.000035499652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023211023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03300123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023211023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056802705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034819732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046151876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943937776","doi":"10.22922/jcpl.26.1.201902.215","title":"A Review on the Legal Systems Related to Birth in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Comparative Private Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.13664712113355118,"score_gpt":0.3943324084322792,"score_spread":0.25768528729872797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943937776","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013426403,0.9989054,0.000013579805,0.00034837282,0.00007320242,0.000005458762,0.000057412104,0.000001243837,0.00046104344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012460175,0.9983449,0.00004236467,0.00018974564,0.000034972578,0.000004579798,0.000034038083,8.2307724e-7,0.00010267118],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979894,0.00031240194,0.00036372495,0.00021557616,0.0009081792,0.00021070668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99038553,0.005291501,0.0010240956,0.00012743386,0.0027234845,0.0004479241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037299977,0.0009235933,0.0026858144,0.015122523,0.0024547076,0.004641469,0.0017927916,0.002124761,0.0049913055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012302066,0.00060112076,0.001415285,0.031017138,0.0030142872,0.001661969,0.0015017549,0.0021578243,0.00031563875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016880072,0.000076796,0.00316075,0.19825643,0.0007980927,0.0003230007,0.0016025739,0.0007108849,0.00023965898,0.015033756,0.05549744,0.7241318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036087768,0.000066520806,0.023286296,0.22737482,0.0024656411,0.00042337933,0.0015759941,0.00012837589,0.0001904662,0.002366511,0.7419872,0.00009862559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83491784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9037235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16508216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032006193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1495012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33210868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945015473","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1371","title":"McLachlin’s Law: In All Its Complex Majesty","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Principle of legality; Majesty; Dialectic; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11783457454489336,"score_gpt":0.3753411928913321,"score_spread":0.25750661834643873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945015473","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05794011,0.2306364,0.0022348561,0.49480283,0.0012625528,0.000029287308,0.00003586474,0.00004843844,0.21300967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8824529,0.028815903,0.001445243,0.057594527,0.0008731943,0.00005069752,0.000020227659,0.000042290823,0.028704932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99489516,0.0026241818,0.000120548764,0.0006608227,0.0013206054,0.0003786825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99412364,0.003890412,0.00036162577,0.00017674702,0.0010301283,0.00041759346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034551616,0.00019631906,0.00035940175,0.0011447464,0.010480443,0.01121772,0.0008662641,0.0039956756,0.0014010238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009932995,0.00020397974,0.00012185486,0.0015263101,0.01770393,0.0037766492,0.0021745346,0.005244921,0.00024576095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014691171,0.000024296744,0.0018656518,0.00017554052,0.000014672913,0.00037253107,0.042105127,0.00013749246,0.00035710548,0.8268228,0.08696735,0.0411426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012228764,0.000040069852,0.004550962,0.0010191395,0.000015341788,0.0004173332,0.02926565,0.0002643569,0.0004715306,0.11832779,0.8455708,0.000044887707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14163496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23462449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14163496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013049703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016131729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28162104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945058320","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1330","title":"Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), The Constitutional Attack on Canada’s Ban on Assisted Dying: Missing an Obvious Chance to Rule on the Charter’s Disability Equality Guarantee","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Supreme court; Constitutional right; Economic Justice; Section (typography); Political science; Criminal code; Constitutional law; Sociology; Criminal law; Business","score_opus":0.11774662583268196,"score_gpt":0.3546349874853857,"score_spread":0.23688836165270372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945058320","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06912741,0.033844136,0.0025024181,0.44316387,0.004789687,0.00042899503,0.0030163387,0.00031075662,0.44281647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40452898,0.010098971,0.0034134767,0.3522395,0.0006804005,0.00028185846,0.00055670727,0.0001120309,0.22808808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952583,0.00035466414,0.0001469508,0.00039458685,0.0019316162,0.0019138099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967134,0.0011105431,0.0001148679,0.000077522,0.0012202306,0.00076333503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031842918,0.0004318723,0.00042407046,0.000900164,0.019758359,0.0063090203,0.0027592056,0.014841679,0.004206658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071773035,0.00070912443,0.0005669535,0.0012217951,0.0054149604,0.0016363037,0.0012734254,0.010334286,0.0004963445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068281406,0.000053800242,0.0037663756,0.00016722843,0.000031780794,0.00086198765,0.0056993663,0.00034336795,0.001018064,0.5094415,0.46058628,0.017961966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001330771,0.000052527233,0.015985122,0.00049370824,0.00009078515,0.00021114582,0.004870338,0.0004645361,0.0014594108,0.020294013,0.95572186,0.00022350415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9889976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05248529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05248529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14433855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3808092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945455563","doi":"10.1017/cls.2019.8","title":"Rethinking Racine v Woods from a Decolonizing Perspective: Challenging the Applicability of Attachment Theory to Indigenous Families Involved with Child Protection","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Tribunal; Commission; Supreme court; Perspective (graphical); Royal Commission; Sociology; Law; Human rights; Political science; Ethnology; Art","score_opus":0.01851872083693038,"score_gpt":0.2701148192813038,"score_spread":0.2515960984443734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945455563","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12806338,0.01222131,0.005874991,0.71942097,0.0031004483,0.00011999046,0.00004866183,0.000033619803,0.13111676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.884231,0.0039941343,0.0024667638,0.09730298,0.0007670752,0.000098849116,0.000011766032,0.000046295245,0.011081197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828597,0.010008879,0.000517975,0.001468454,0.002952118,0.002192897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9607411,0.030637791,0.0012133622,0.0015926894,0.004508998,0.0013060538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03753363,0.00027462584,0.00055508985,0.0012815899,0.018530808,0.009291191,0.0045612096,0.011158578,0.002035772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048815396,0.00045401652,0.00049905485,0.0012371453,0.034505084,0.008935366,0.006392008,0.0186905,0.00015930818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016272157,0.000022064109,0.001953958,0.00012403837,0.0000118586195,0.001469231,0.17415752,0.00015357912,0.00027117625,0.7683218,0.037895918,0.0156025905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027590837,0.00007200964,0.007213381,0.0025163563,0.00008821081,0.0010250331,0.3464903,0.0010686902,0.0009466829,0.18792194,0.45249474,0.00013509097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36825868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59804827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6317413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01940586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028090743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73223037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945678222","doi":"10.29173/alr2516","title":"Envisioning Indigenous Community Courts to Realize Justice in Canada for First Nations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Economic Justice; Commission; Political science; Law; Colonialism; Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; First nation; Indigenous rights; Public administration; Sociology; Human rights; Business","score_opus":0.03719898466501784,"score_gpt":0.33430139929520747,"score_spread":0.2971024146301896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945678222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07883779,0.048471887,0.0028060144,0.3885728,0.0014455521,0.00018656485,0.00024250611,0.00007060931,0.47936633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88294303,0.021950034,0.0032660167,0.034254976,0.000312718,0.000087953325,0.00010280325,0.00003300103,0.057049472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928595,0.0012761151,0.00009165395,0.00031628713,0.0017990288,0.0036574854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99216133,0.0015799681,0.00031670558,0.00014480147,0.003188032,0.0026091873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005612732,0.0002619884,0.00029848074,0.0023160998,0.0226813,0.01631035,0.0026438863,0.005970794,0.004443285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00966096,0.00032282682,0.00038972255,0.0022780285,0.017524198,0.0043809307,0.004180959,0.0069315843,0.0002349637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008994232,0.000026322843,0.0020257803,0.00009855119,0.000012537804,0.00033274255,0.009852708,0.00076686224,0.00016068925,0.9364605,0.033817258,0.016436927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052641117,0.000041640804,0.01198028,0.00097070716,0.00006984917,0.0002631647,0.05255171,0.0019909625,0.00032632682,0.15796359,0.77364093,0.00014813394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98998547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15504415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15504415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3835233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.980029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945859056","doi":"","title":"The Canadian constitutional history and its determinants","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Political science; Constitutional law; Law; Order (exchange); Sociology; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08019135196767825,"score_gpt":0.30847716184537355,"score_spread":0.2282858098776953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945859056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035792634,0.020617194,0.0012497939,0.085531116,0.0006203175,0.00006186553,0.0016349325,0.00008553294,0.8544067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9205009,0.011115304,0.0008359219,0.0051535787,0.0003422212,0.000042376014,0.00041755594,0.00009080663,0.06150126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99166274,0.00083193375,0.00014294246,0.0007999789,0.0035993352,0.0029631774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99014366,0.0019203239,0.000466139,0.00041254287,0.005393242,0.0016641055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003539191,0.00051867735,0.00061123574,0.007853455,0.029864138,0.015227025,0.0021544942,0.0021416477,0.017463721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01600923,0.0005027338,0.00042951462,0.016235694,0.025559584,0.0035596187,0.0037597816,0.0040641734,0.0007038098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001056402,0.000005734511,0.0018918429,0.000043356576,0.000008378087,0.00008278627,0.0028299175,0.00028022344,0.000042084157,0.9597545,0.024704477,0.01034603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018992132,0.0000112169055,0.028751053,0.00048708843,0.00004208669,0.0001072023,0.009369909,0.0006268019,0.00018773544,0.12665652,0.833637,0.00010444249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27734768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27734768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23034942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8381742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946927932","doi":"10.7202/1059524ar","title":"L’influence religieuse sur le droit civil du Québec","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012876096143054861,"score_gpt":0.23427033989621074,"score_spread":0.2213942437531559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946927932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80037415,0.004054439,0.00033148457,0.016008785,0.00008519173,0.000017563465,0.00042060603,0.000010842757,0.17869684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865106,0.0010027005,0.000067263,0.0005687586,0.000011318095,0.0000043135087,0.000046427383,0.0000053941394,0.011783293],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898523,0.0003125646,0.00001567178,0.00008868235,0.00030082586,0.00029694143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974421,0.00058554695,0.0003005331,0.00008189817,0.0010488316,0.0005409498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009583602,0.00011155582,0.00017927584,0.0007428112,0.0044562677,0.0022139763,0.0003852608,0.00046069198,0.009943547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022224605,0.00009530806,0.00012496852,0.0012763445,0.0028782072,0.00048098032,0.0008521358,0.0010329364,0.0002863251],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022262284,0.0002398108,0.39428025,0.00041560194,0.0002271029,0.0014705121,0.12707765,0.0016243628,0.0039946805,0.2248677,0.05280969,0.19277002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018172546,0.000059202357,0.76817095,0.00047968113,0.00005492529,0.00012887304,0.039729267,0.00056632154,0.00046686322,0.0021689353,0.18809845,0.000058333553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98278356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9916214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03227419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03227419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024239426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23416668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946991612","doi":"10.7202/1059396ar","title":"LES NOUVELLES RÈGLES RELATIVES À LA FILIATION","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.024452968563565478,"score_gpt":0.2820466200658873,"score_spread":0.25759365150232183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946991612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4154927,0.0043693176,0.011098086,0.0153314825,0.00037073623,0.00013011745,0.0011317632,0.000185544,0.55189025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8341727,0.0012783274,0.0025272449,0.0005462804,0.000050783652,0.00004993,0.000285456,0.000055767276,0.16103344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707234,0.0005479349,0.00008416038,0.00039318856,0.00084745954,0.0010548807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963109,0.00054826104,0.00040631066,0.00044361036,0.0017534768,0.000537366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021346838,0.00032657586,0.000320517,0.0015588098,0.007762247,0.0057267463,0.00092012377,0.00093274575,0.019964065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006403969,0.00024756807,0.0003208934,0.0018395924,0.0062995064,0.0022498544,0.0026669202,0.0019230904,0.0015990562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014219143,0.00003771444,0.041515253,0.00019327283,0.00003135547,0.0006989876,0.09736147,0.00065004476,0.002372089,0.7189589,0.013845783,0.12419286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020579002,0.000072181414,0.14528513,0.0005650829,0.000052715608,0.00062608114,0.06251037,0.00044803228,0.0020678232,0.02608038,0.7621683,0.000103285805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6531689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7637036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6531689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022139836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03216861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69774723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947002259","doi":"10.7202/1058597ar","title":"La garde conjointe des enfants de familles désunies","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Avant garde; Philosophy; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.021798821107533298,"score_gpt":0.28154728903411746,"score_spread":0.2597484679265842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947002259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6099687,0.0065744813,0.0074373833,0.03540029,0.00070185267,0.00009851057,0.00027483306,0.00006276109,0.33948112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92289543,0.0008164816,0.00096811564,0.0013532583,0.000032951153,0.000027557331,0.000037271806,0.000023812247,0.07384511],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813676,0.00075134315,0.00003406235,0.00018022626,0.000328888,0.0005687018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791175,0.0008118045,0.00021743946,0.000119290715,0.0004163532,0.0005233135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019882747,0.00041320914,0.00033225914,0.00093826174,0.01597649,0.0039423164,0.00089681544,0.0020187958,0.008503054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003786094,0.00023291967,0.00025164944,0.0009538856,0.014801274,0.0030300885,0.0039371946,0.0029821566,0.0005505809],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024982173,0.000008853559,0.0035187635,0.00004844177,0.000008024669,0.0018441906,0.825698,0.000068407986,0.00073060294,0.15054521,0.0066188504,0.010885667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040996156,0.000029023966,0.00958976,0.00027441865,0.000009978007,0.0017385756,0.6172172,0.00013275113,0.00043562302,0.008980584,0.36153603,0.000052011874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53848785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73684233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53848785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015842283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00835359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9284602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947072380","doi":"10.7202/1059555ar","title":"Divorce Reform in Canada: New Perspectives; An Analytical Review of Bill C-10 (Canada), 1984","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Law; Commission; Political science; Law reform; Substantive due process; Mediation; Sociology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.02077784982546968,"score_gpt":0.2757446722454064,"score_spread":0.25496682241993673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947072380","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060610017,0.59892213,0.0011983165,0.1634269,0.0024233463,0.00014841963,0.0006794294,0.0000396669,0.22710073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14429305,0.72150326,0.002819475,0.05927571,0.0017123087,0.00018214877,0.00050576136,0.00007085034,0.069637395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99160224,0.0008054271,0.00022288779,0.00040664425,0.0047908146,0.0021718512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940276,0.0008170146,0.00022761544,0.00010515576,0.0041447547,0.0006778022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004398747,0.00067435467,0.0007493207,0.009186148,0.017628726,0.010424589,0.003547484,0.0059418045,0.0068080546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008899705,0.0007797397,0.0009164839,0.015043781,0.011384426,0.0036624433,0.0028330833,0.005986796,0.000500389],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017017586,0.000047344205,0.0016854586,0.00062803633,0.000017792385,0.00024556558,0.0029593152,0.0013701218,0.00008970473,0.7043243,0.22536117,0.06325417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011447236,0.000014291166,0.007793755,0.0015063958,0.00002517039,0.00006820835,0.0034577653,0.0004734882,0.000093144256,0.016723076,0.9697766,0.0000568003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99647564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33420515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.33420515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.44728357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77222764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947158220","doi":"10.7202/1059523ar","title":"Critères de qualification des acquêts et des Family Assets en droit québécois et ontarien","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.03586718824020959,"score_gpt":0.3167255226416232,"score_spread":0.2808583344014136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947158220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8890022,0.0009253857,0.00222557,0.0022714555,0.00004420552,0.00016344295,0.0027440847,0.000015581498,0.102608025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858247,0.00025671106,0.001605822,0.00011002157,0.0000067941623,0.00009378265,0.0007786289,0.000007709625,0.011315789],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974336,0.0007232774,0.00016211542,0.00021239794,0.0010517634,0.00041690606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881357,0.0036470895,0.001745668,0.00044365437,0.0043733697,0.0016544109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034786637,0.00034464168,0.00042348588,0.0042567085,0.0047484706,0.0034310191,0.0009938419,0.00063247705,0.010264808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018408535,0.00015652186,0.0003129495,0.004928917,0.0033984561,0.001224063,0.0020705233,0.0011149304,0.00048474508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015059012,0.00009309841,0.7929945,0.00024746676,0.00018229191,0.0005857608,0.049229313,0.0021015054,0.00057449966,0.092971474,0.009691641,0.051177915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010658497,0.00004523698,0.9319965,0.00036934993,0.00005160095,0.00015876304,0.034500856,0.0013471675,0.00030204747,0.006188832,0.024971766,0.000057294787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8659173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9060125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13408267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016175022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016354222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26974458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947240080","doi":"10.7202/1058494ar","title":"A Practitioner’s Guide to Spousal Support in Divorce Proceedings","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Law; Child support; Family law; Perspective (graphical); Supreme court; Action (physics); Closure (psychology); Sociology; Term (time); Political science; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.016528434753196607,"score_gpt":0.29903343568000823,"score_spread":0.28250500092681163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947240080","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015281435,0.42123646,0.13673246,0.16083466,0.015928293,0.0015869311,0.0043024193,0.0036244034,0.2542262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013900955,0.570763,0.18914624,0.09388664,0.01647069,0.0036687236,0.0035427038,0.0018416555,0.10677936],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99422544,0.0027761352,0.0009772363,0.000381031,0.001342249,0.0002980033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97588885,0.018510541,0.00093561516,0.0009814219,0.002697558,0.0009860432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008409061,0.0022179794,0.0019738588,0.013219406,0.0028540741,0.0039086128,0.003946801,0.010256435,0.034274574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02284052,0.0025310186,0.00097070273,0.013516583,0.005864457,0.008751082,0.0048097386,0.010108755,0.026770178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025593707,0.00026767736,0.00044611303,0.0016891864,0.00001145033,0.0005605002,0.0024906332,0.00068029563,0.00036323976,0.028310586,0.7121206,0.25303423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008794165,0.000029459812,0.00062284555,0.0018024024,0.0000039904253,0.00083198544,0.0007121366,0.00026367628,0.00004601288,0.023850063,0.9718075,0.000021212998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010054301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022726191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034274574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031758302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008116278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114659905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947241187","doi":"10.7202/1059395ar","title":"LA VALIDITÉ PLUS QUE DOUTEUSE DE LA « LOI PORTANT RÉFORME DU DROIT DE LA FAMILLE »","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01309443424254887,"score_gpt":0.2648505447641996,"score_spread":0.25175611052165076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947241187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20244755,0.007905628,0.0041776774,0.20090802,0.0011113317,0.00013703846,0.0009922262,0.00010190012,0.5822186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85849863,0.001984465,0.0014914974,0.016760208,0.00016258487,0.00007012208,0.00024983456,0.000046220255,0.120736346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941182,0.0014033697,0.00014539872,0.0005898932,0.0022493673,0.001493697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884908,0.0029538036,0.00086654286,0.0010297361,0.0053546955,0.0013044183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058638123,0.00019092618,0.0002979576,0.0010257522,0.010537708,0.006441315,0.0010533449,0.002362908,0.010005934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013868773,0.00021680024,0.00028742707,0.0012165693,0.008587641,0.0021919913,0.002378065,0.00443265,0.0008016733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007603374,0.00007048717,0.028641634,0.00025630867,0.000041751595,0.00034659266,0.07451642,0.00029517396,0.0015122747,0.74405724,0.09004286,0.060143117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030904557,0.00007123354,0.09662363,0.0006946179,0.000049747385,0.00020182885,0.036996685,0.00039774063,0.0012225107,0.020234773,0.843374,0.0001022891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.888144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95061934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.888144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043305308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06901845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31420344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947263021","doi":"10.7202/1059525ar","title":"Quelques aspects de l’influence religieuse sur le droit de la personne et de la famille au Québec","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011314602336054138,"score_gpt":0.27063690072980495,"score_spread":0.2593222983937508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947263021","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7238152,0.0059657143,0.0014551696,0.027716309,0.00021356455,0.00003206095,0.00091153424,0.000028659495,0.23986173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793465,0.0014585978,0.00019247644,0.00086309924,0.000022908762,0.000006715243,0.00009638632,0.000010734019,0.018002637],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901855,0.00025455418,0.000015371636,0.00009529263,0.0002506672,0.00036553026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792105,0.0002811209,0.00019021901,0.000095939824,0.0009564808,0.0005552026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008772923,0.0001844962,0.00020160803,0.0007370077,0.0074227424,0.002982775,0.00051455747,0.000430794,0.011269016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021505307,0.00015566261,0.0001980416,0.0012939656,0.0036381327,0.0008403795,0.001114856,0.0011526132,0.0003279524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020211008,0.00013596633,0.4163303,0.0003248039,0.000266344,0.0012545914,0.15999453,0.0014523116,0.0031283218,0.21473722,0.048618313,0.15355512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012480668,0.000030423345,0.77308494,0.0004452722,0.00006435926,0.00013510512,0.063713916,0.00033481597,0.00040141548,0.0034379351,0.15826568,0.000073737036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98296344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99325246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0327815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0327815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026974961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2378475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947336318","doi":"10.7202/1059449ar","title":"LE PIQUETAGE","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.01799399683322791,"score_gpt":0.26234259948340066,"score_spread":0.24434860265017275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947336318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08959597,0.0026143328,0.009742081,0.009370838,0.0017550152,0.00047271032,0.0016910401,0.0005259768,0.884232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23345593,0.0017065182,0.0036021257,0.0016031194,0.00020786872,0.00022912667,0.0012618671,0.00040572733,0.75752777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99477565,0.0009108537,0.00014812502,0.00087159756,0.0021206713,0.0011730943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99491465,0.00059400644,0.0003749243,0.0005568747,0.0023507394,0.0012088344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003114187,0.0005526267,0.00044473124,0.0020627405,0.014850312,0.00802287,0.0015282691,0.0015879968,0.09721139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013112057,0.00047602577,0.0004593484,0.0031415247,0.0036994007,0.0028831228,0.004618369,0.002850842,0.02024175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027755162,0.000105703526,0.028251998,0.0003467925,0.000034595956,0.0011916214,0.06121307,0.00046164513,0.001671242,0.39053848,0.27168632,0.244221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000102340055,0.000031379346,0.0134832645,0.00013986236,0.000008306132,0.00021732078,0.009682736,0.00014868985,0.00019899257,0.0029991025,0.9730531,0.000027082155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32789126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48125628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32789126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012418626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024392193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65196544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947336602","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v12n2p79","title":"A Brief Analysis of the Essence of Education and Human Ethics-Hegel’s View","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Individualism; Epistemology; Sociology; Determinacy; Politics; Information ethics; Meta-ethics; Social science; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03512962697681104,"score_gpt":0.3752515058570027,"score_spread":0.34012187888019163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947336602","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016758876,0.12882178,0.03737238,0.08972807,0.0028488892,0.00010529813,0.00021273119,0.000058267284,0.7240937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69441533,0.12357463,0.023334442,0.045445833,0.005907006,0.00034352628,0.00021716903,0.00011564788,0.10664647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785346,0.0012151625,0.00006916662,0.00019371601,0.00041424253,0.00025433832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881387,0.00089445134,0.000074734235,0.00004190424,0.000105922685,0.00006910891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016608711,0.00053761527,0.00044879748,0.0030970294,0.0029341648,0.004836983,0.00072688016,0.0031981813,0.0028070763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015667635,0.00029373134,0.00048642806,0.001975559,0.022751596,0.0070722583,0.0023182782,0.0058000293,0.0006105577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002158004,0.000004690081,0.00003891406,0.000033737615,0.000001325803,0.000025539526,0.0014159962,0.00008276409,0.00003661049,0.9939027,0.001627111,0.0028284353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035862313,0.000018273488,0.00043812685,0.00048768488,0.000004688403,0.0001543265,0.0026518055,0.00028378938,0.00019860468,0.69984144,0.29590225,0.00001539363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005018849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045111524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067009274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067009274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003574104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048618913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947337420","doi":"","title":"MOVING TOWARD SAME-SEX MARRIAGE","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Charter; Political science; Modernization theory; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07014460930952837,"score_gpt":0.3263478769814064,"score_spread":0.256203267671878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947337420","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03399099,0.2357855,0.0023093866,0.33317357,0.0058667045,0.00006085607,0.00021092455,0.000042144442,0.38855994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5595099,0.17001076,0.0029996452,0.19037898,0.0017131761,0.000050210172,0.00021772149,0.000042860658,0.07507687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905979,0.0017956363,0.00023782066,0.0008163139,0.00487246,0.0016798913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99301624,0.00088112324,0.00038516597,0.00023139057,0.004549284,0.00093665475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005710508,0.00017342751,0.00052096,0.002429558,0.007985048,0.0048342273,0.0015406418,0.0033099,0.003792704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073428787,0.00020908256,0.0003310914,0.002625662,0.012337506,0.0028476717,0.002400752,0.0053820475,0.00050714373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018723957,0.000021609632,0.0023711629,0.00044787282,0.00001147205,0.00021169557,0.011934412,0.000110750094,0.0002889818,0.7997309,0.0754397,0.1094126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009438985,0.000018942865,0.0069867447,0.00081175094,0.000015342695,0.00022598215,0.006556708,0.000052012485,0.00020913909,0.02196199,0.96313196,0.000019987496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8455277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9233377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8455277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037417788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0843832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31076396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947394613","doi":"10.7202/1059390ar","title":"LES EFFETS DU MARIAGE, SELON LA CONCEPTION DU LÉGISLATEUR QUÉBÉCOIS DE 1980","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013269706276767827,"score_gpt":0.25697626518865585,"score_spread":0.24370655891188803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947394613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53486997,0.0043146624,0.00310668,0.021020973,0.0005702638,0.00021132464,0.0009845755,0.00018103459,0.43474045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6244862,0.00070490927,0.0007808511,0.0024724344,0.000027235348,0.000101969876,0.00013356756,0.000033509063,0.37125933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984005,0.00022665947,0.000030275925,0.00025482115,0.0005171545,0.0005706702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983504,0.00022151014,0.000095878815,0.00006740683,0.0008396395,0.00042513257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012207237,0.00035595422,0.0002984694,0.0011102924,0.009956009,0.0030333155,0.0008691794,0.0016781115,0.012311306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028514767,0.0003572728,0.00029409002,0.000916006,0.004603695,0.0007901856,0.0015981443,0.0029634207,0.00079179066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002227321,0.00010367679,0.06408298,0.0002911764,0.00009187874,0.0011957088,0.11378618,0.0017629745,0.0073314398,0.60285395,0.09943886,0.10883841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002195451,0.00008622921,0.16478488,0.0002848291,0.000032993852,0.00013213749,0.021019064,0.0005726254,0.0013664849,0.0027694395,0.80881345,0.00011602655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9764188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0674743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0674743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05454788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48956257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947416598","doi":"10.7202/1059284ar","title":"Regards sur les systèmes de partage des biens en droit matrimonial québécois et ontarien","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020327147053809985,"score_gpt":0.26382747057567313,"score_spread":0.24350032352186315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947416598","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64897585,0.005822954,0.002502392,0.025137953,0.000094801486,0.000086397624,0.0003634185,0.000035278408,0.31698102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9501578,0.0007675947,0.00048101,0.0005776726,0.000009341461,0.000021390772,0.00005342145,0.000011157578,0.04792072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814355,0.00042601908,0.00004200211,0.0002004097,0.00038228222,0.0008056806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980107,0.00038920893,0.00020738882,0.00013969952,0.0007633801,0.00048969395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018580537,0.00022114928,0.00027865433,0.0014459327,0.016031636,0.0054921233,0.0012946911,0.0012401491,0.009088313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033115933,0.00028007262,0.00023421866,0.0026421957,0.014767949,0.0021321867,0.002593767,0.0019038772,0.00035739064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005201678,0.000024655305,0.020819934,0.00009575731,0.000027517022,0.00046486195,0.26244998,0.00045441234,0.0011401993,0.6772465,0.011586933,0.02563734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022037011,0.00007185314,0.23233363,0.0005624652,0.000066460896,0.00028712602,0.28023985,0.0013441504,0.00092923135,0.029861659,0.45415086,0.00013072476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9763451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99051964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08628812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08628812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046296045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62606704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947420023","doi":"10.7202/1058495ar","title":"L’impact de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés sur le droit de la famille au Québec","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015209583879104075,"score_gpt":0.2698737326584115,"score_spread":0.25466414877930743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947420023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42645997,0.006676596,0.0021881405,0.053351894,0.00083614595,0.000103840255,0.0014805106,0.00007354021,0.5088293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9217596,0.0017908489,0.00070800236,0.003033301,0.000049405888,0.000042858315,0.00022855359,0.000024741952,0.07236264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976266,0.0005500652,0.000046471338,0.00018754402,0.00066087465,0.0009284195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962838,0.00063566375,0.00019667413,0.00014610314,0.0018357704,0.0009020097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017198339,0.00021796985,0.00031019148,0.00093813037,0.0089913495,0.0040196823,0.00064120063,0.0009789943,0.016513595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042802324,0.00016078512,0.0002988233,0.0012575866,0.0037029688,0.0010090845,0.002079179,0.0027478049,0.000534269],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017390499,0.00012173207,0.100463845,0.0004103007,0.00012384368,0.0014867104,0.07446788,0.0025831694,0.0021414845,0.6159565,0.0865845,0.11548612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038807728,0.00010217961,0.31440917,0.0010058535,0.000108141496,0.00023407892,0.062232003,0.0011270227,0.00069714943,0.0087705795,0.6111319,0.0001431585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97429997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049166083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049166083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.068239056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3567266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947508577","doi":"10.7202/1059529ar","title":"The Co-Parental Divorce: Removing the Children from the Jurisdiction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Mediation; Child custody; Confidentiality; Law; Psychology; Best interests; Political science","score_opus":0.011602042843237789,"score_gpt":0.2631386294088412,"score_spread":0.2515365865656034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947508577","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16089834,0.018688101,0.008317788,0.27702698,0.0052368813,0.00029946503,0.00019215014,0.000053781117,0.5292865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8527108,0.005760811,0.0015916252,0.0792956,0.0012711986,0.00017715464,0.000045908735,0.00004516988,0.05910174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99068844,0.0027965775,0.0004307788,0.00097533234,0.0025266742,0.0025821894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958813,0.0021114263,0.0002704474,0.00029205828,0.00085010054,0.00059461535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063057984,0.00032568537,0.0005336066,0.0006467973,0.017793136,0.0062593464,0.0019647512,0.0127285,0.0026964918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015545735,0.000574431,0.0007057428,0.000652457,0.016109252,0.0037873301,0.0061245747,0.01552224,0.00048814857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056430847,0.000034030287,0.0034023752,0.00006962965,0.000023604507,0.003133759,0.03331469,0.00012709116,0.00069566234,0.9017763,0.041835386,0.015531091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019566597,0.00018403375,0.011060201,0.0011076493,0.00018075187,0.0025892067,0.058772475,0.00081562874,0.003951325,0.12185009,0.79911095,0.00018193878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22206461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4324813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22206461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074414243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024384672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44154412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947536659","doi":"10.7202/1059192ar","title":"Le droit d’un tiers à la garde d’un enfant : l’affaire Vignaux-Fines c. Chardon, [1987] 2 R.C.S. 244","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.012826495451307722,"score_gpt":0.23876324174205707,"score_spread":0.22593674629074934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947536659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14906138,0.028142495,0.003977829,0.21924667,0.0018879592,0.000106352374,0.00022391588,0.000039083083,0.5973144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8001041,0.0041579334,0.0009361806,0.0258823,0.00017206908,0.000049213402,0.000033259905,0.00003754062,0.16862747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981913,0.0010321966,0.000029784442,0.00014673956,0.00021693693,0.000383062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990814,0.0003707372,0.00006853186,0.000039781957,0.00024150792,0.0001980682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015788444,0.00031260093,0.00021037715,0.00042085018,0.018484753,0.0039223074,0.0007613371,0.004037723,0.004943468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025274039,0.00026139908,0.00021583127,0.0005482851,0.010083017,0.0018863578,0.0020866452,0.004893319,0.0005343487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004450249,0.000037107202,0.0035073075,0.000075872005,0.000005747838,0.0025600784,0.31786975,0.00012412434,0.0005218897,0.5556572,0.10157024,0.018026145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006291532,0.000042360225,0.00794721,0.00027106213,0.0000068757467,0.0008964338,0.1411214,0.00012880197,0.00041902048,0.013956385,0.8351577,0.000046521833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62753606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.829816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62753606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014683538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008993818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7493149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947570889","doi":"10.7202/1059226ar","title":"La présomption de paternité : complice ou rivale de l’acte de naissance","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.0474494437514961,"score_gpt":0.28785711290839594,"score_spread":0.24040766915689984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947570889","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.173612,0.015347921,0.010677146,0.07488881,0.0013099703,0.00007318261,0.0003112022,0.0000738683,0.72370595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8894871,0.0037456083,0.001716756,0.008733774,0.00031148546,0.00004612054,0.000085635475,0.00007976229,0.09579375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99219257,0.003095143,0.00016971311,0.00084588636,0.002517313,0.0011793947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99127495,0.003547294,0.0009918199,0.0008786342,0.0023611092,0.00094610563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056385472,0.0003368603,0.00041835435,0.0010118348,0.008902678,0.006726805,0.0015236237,0.0026189424,0.010358821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012623504,0.00039283396,0.00038536475,0.001216928,0.025371324,0.003389218,0.004329152,0.0053893607,0.00081941107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009134401,0.000025929174,0.015937055,0.00017317788,0.00003551792,0.00061690854,0.09860672,0.00024310457,0.0007796175,0.81891817,0.012424254,0.052148227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022431754,0.00010014164,0.08123822,0.0012630444,0.0000670454,0.0010490181,0.06542847,0.00070808217,0.0016371701,0.08277811,0.7655396,0.0001687152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4326828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5970438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4326828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019802146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023047993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8603286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947604827","doi":"10.7202/1059393ar","title":"LA LOI 89 ET L’AUTORITÉ PARENTALE","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020846407870796637,"score_gpt":0.28546170819481137,"score_spread":0.26461530032401476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947604827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09985389,0.011047217,0.0028449236,0.04989018,0.0014326787,0.000119654964,0.000464224,0.00011455142,0.8342326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56261396,0.005289857,0.0017251542,0.01871965,0.0009757393,0.0002765081,0.00030295234,0.0000837668,0.4100124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611014,0.0008616023,0.0001449843,0.00051676837,0.0009073123,0.0014591888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975617,0.00092877715,0.00044522306,0.0002327845,0.0004994243,0.00033202965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031129776,0.00047902728,0.0003417753,0.0011230401,0.0043799323,0.0057620085,0.00093509984,0.0031221653,0.014392755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071148807,0.00041732012,0.00055757014,0.0012155634,0.0060533257,0.002255629,0.0039336467,0.0060878773,0.0018571696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050361217,0.000043079228,0.0039945357,0.00005540294,0.000010762333,0.00029474398,0.010083297,0.00012460348,0.00025173547,0.925716,0.020086242,0.039289344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005990235,0.000096360425,0.016701914,0.0002894685,0.000028884073,0.00024069108,0.0030497247,0.00013036869,0.00068450475,0.025763093,0.9529015,0.0000536783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11362187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15169133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11362187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015758136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011748204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22592103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947628684","doi":"10.7202/1059409ar","title":"LES TRIBUNAUX CANADIENS ET LA PROTECTION DES DROITS DE LA PERSONNE","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023447151050006318,"score_gpt":0.2875757972630302,"score_spread":0.26412864621302384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947628684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08301909,0.016665336,0.002898089,0.024133395,0.00043538483,0.000049393162,0.000074571355,0.00002441632,0.8727003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8982631,0.008166794,0.0008987792,0.0028432233,0.00015868663,0.0000644814,0.00004378268,0.000024998824,0.08953611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961052,0.0017426349,0.000114387556,0.0003165911,0.00077523594,0.0009459979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792,0.0010076913,0.00018692091,0.00023014436,0.000442074,0.00021326363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020110502,0.00036418138,0.00037338055,0.0019450458,0.010523563,0.0070553753,0.0009761713,0.0024587403,0.009866579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004585986,0.0001683576,0.00041450455,0.0028036493,0.016490897,0.0025504744,0.0045401123,0.0034603472,0.0009111953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010192506,0.000012402015,0.0010102045,0.00008290413,0.000006687744,0.00014033885,0.03514531,0.00013520912,0.00009988139,0.95054615,0.0027496421,0.010061208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001908917,0.00005050976,0.013246349,0.0007692459,0.000026904236,0.00044683088,0.07122533,0.00031607552,0.0006239589,0.15834624,0.7548792,0.000050220704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16027741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21627821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9896933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010306719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011789531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.318689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947725684","doi":"10.7202/1059327ar","title":"Le sort d’une instance d’arbitrage d’un grief après la réussite d’un recours en évocation","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.014090011116568536,"score_gpt":0.24252734527374495,"score_spread":0.2284373341571764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947725684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25349253,0.0029455076,0.046527486,0.07130354,0.001045966,0.00023356358,0.00016777772,0.00011804085,0.6241656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9152664,0.0005032731,0.006027697,0.002796316,0.000108990534,0.00005299994,0.00003339217,0.000046119047,0.07516479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99102193,0.004135332,0.00027461123,0.0011123399,0.001671855,0.0017839659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99387383,0.0016480325,0.000673837,0.0011250305,0.001803935,0.00087540655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007666288,0.00034260508,0.00043907235,0.0008794516,0.018268794,0.009495068,0.002285745,0.005230067,0.012447063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012195012,0.000350961,0.00046908183,0.0010018718,0.02330041,0.0067521175,0.005231099,0.006992016,0.00089178456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028903502,0.000031114534,0.0036270614,0.00007398717,0.000016193135,0.0007768889,0.09142612,0.00022577826,0.0008564543,0.8817346,0.006600297,0.014602622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003180878,0.000086573564,0.015902419,0.0006816288,0.00004081727,0.001324568,0.20612067,0.0012405082,0.0022717104,0.14365256,0.6284736,0.00017317114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30881104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5826149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30881104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01886376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026619561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61402714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947750987","doi":"10.7202/1059391ar","title":"LES RÉGIMES MATRIMONIAUX SECONDAIRES À LA LUMIÈRE DU NOUVEAU CODE CIVIL DU QUÉBEC","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.013577892477466538,"score_gpt":0.2498721581920723,"score_spread":0.23629426571460577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947750987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73462343,0.004065147,0.0030142353,0.007642947,0.00019907407,0.00015261328,0.0009039973,0.00007887237,0.24931964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9312588,0.0009321716,0.0010799859,0.00060891896,0.000029685327,0.0000735396,0.00020943012,0.000018464902,0.06578896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967225,0.00059984525,0.000100369136,0.00030562127,0.0011517516,0.0011199671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99413776,0.00119654,0.00092402205,0.00040676384,0.0024644514,0.0008705084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017753342,0.00030175372,0.00035761273,0.0018337169,0.0068155862,0.0037395288,0.00090973004,0.0009407059,0.009181523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065221805,0.00024275444,0.00037089133,0.0028249263,0.003498538,0.0009544571,0.0011345828,0.002169447,0.00040171552],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024330588,0.0001529777,0.17132589,0.00041549854,0.00014769932,0.0010804477,0.071959026,0.0025381097,0.00468918,0.5511469,0.0282771,0.16802388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003767795,0.00009575989,0.55633885,0.00045437933,0.000043773347,0.00020892211,0.016906247,0.0014975097,0.0012373875,0.0047297426,0.41837066,0.00007909943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9515239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97787195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9486023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051397707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038890034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37291825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947784110","doi":"","title":"ACPNS Legal Case Notes Series: 2019-30 CANADA TRUST v PUBLIC GUARDIAN AND TRUSTEE 2019 ONSC 1768 (CANLII)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Guardian; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.009919627625948562,"score_gpt":0.21820275218338606,"score_spread":0.2082831245574375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947784110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01647365,0.003144961,0.0006708802,0.084462315,0.003750281,0.00059117377,0.0074234037,0.00020613545,0.8832771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06989456,0.0013819946,0.00047462573,0.059159372,0.00050426717,0.000234572,0.0019440148,0.00009004873,0.86631656],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99596405,0.00016737512,0.000111313544,0.0002558514,0.001906202,0.0015951068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971194,0.00040075314,0.00008505703,0.00011049299,0.0014492588,0.0008350035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018977552,0.00063138845,0.00030416,0.001634811,0.019344809,0.0047811316,0.002523879,0.014013395,0.045407727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006725582,0.0008233955,0.00074708625,0.0017470315,0.00276818,0.0014852182,0.0024441597,0.008308581,0.007982692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004515155,0.000050737857,0.0016496626,0.00005054598,0.000007688874,0.0009962405,0.0012902248,0.000103918064,0.00026443717,0.03477438,0.95471793,0.0060490198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040059884,0.000028624156,0.008698101,0.00022233673,0.000028238976,0.0004336278,0.002617532,0.00021550541,0.0005308111,0.003078294,0.9840481,0.000058808506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9645482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9914316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051775604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051775604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10655192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37566006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947836574","doi":"10.7202/1059146ar","title":"Incidences de la réforme du droit de la famille sur le rôle des juges au Québec","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.015220883419002317,"score_gpt":0.258122009705598,"score_spread":0.2429011262865957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947836574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93703616,0.0017085659,0.0002594006,0.007202914,0.00003574732,0.00003153619,0.00034179515,0.00001084851,0.053373165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923064,0.00062161137,0.00006520811,0.00018207615,0.000007129691,0.000010851013,0.00004926304,0.000004461306,0.0067529804],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966708,0.0007978054,0.00007595311,0.00021697117,0.00094402744,0.0012944868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98816967,0.003002175,0.00197567,0.000584657,0.004200001,0.0020677336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031719604,0.00013951123,0.00027231398,0.0014143175,0.0050073373,0.0025092664,0.0006571696,0.0006608952,0.008689222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010639236,0.00016861095,0.00013312264,0.0021847717,0.003944423,0.0010754659,0.0022566617,0.0017568023,0.00026551646],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019413962,0.00016359854,0.5182872,0.00033866218,0.00008613,0.0010311578,0.22291948,0.0010505219,0.0016226326,0.1034127,0.021916281,0.12897749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008315851,0.00005838561,0.81608874,0.00038968248,0.000030209594,0.00014612466,0.09650509,0.0004313205,0.00044583043,0.0011981536,0.08465394,0.000044180044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9138197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95955825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08618033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03150798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029455993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22860748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947837352","doi":"10.7202/1059148ar","title":"Le contentieux familial en droit pénal canadien","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015112279091324687,"score_gpt":0.2444189020358247,"score_spread":0.22930662294450002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947837352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78935456,0.016750675,0.00070210086,0.06155724,0.00053224573,0.000023417491,0.00017860501,0.000024123681,0.13087714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905201,0.0036161207,0.00007534444,0.00083059364,0.00012222647,0.000011389332,0.000026359143,0.000013083651,0.0047848104],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972849,0.0014325582,0.00009873857,0.00018054066,0.0005282639,0.00047497274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928477,0.0036387593,0.0014746303,0.00042308355,0.0006822443,0.0009335994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020684297,0.00029689763,0.00036022547,0.0025951874,0.008210966,0.0051018875,0.00077677064,0.0012751063,0.0064342446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014560929,0.00022486917,0.00016338211,0.0033117726,0.012293762,0.0031249553,0.0056887865,0.0023035533,0.00027689585],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003164534,0.00006802001,0.046301603,0.0002074593,0.000033134216,0.0017656725,0.78064144,0.00014286344,0.00012779357,0.12649466,0.00923486,0.034950934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072462003,0.000038800194,0.12615903,0.0011012753,0.0000507785,0.0015296885,0.7288441,0.00019262052,0.00020648657,0.014870541,0.1269476,0.000051878527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15630712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17260179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8436929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00842731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00658192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3107946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947839655","doi":"10.7202/1059143ar","title":"L’évolution du droit des successions dans ses rapports avec la famille","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01685874080840239,"score_gpt":0.2588533028366148,"score_spread":0.2419945620282124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947839655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8888933,0.001161753,0.0016688132,0.004186618,0.00007252029,0.000051131075,0.00044791488,0.00003690156,0.10348103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9667964,0.0002804369,0.00056679593,0.000117807125,0.000010087245,0.000012675004,0.00008261729,0.000014392993,0.032118794],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849296,0.00036702873,0.00003737434,0.00022011981,0.0002651728,0.0006172907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965706,0.0005297937,0.00051698904,0.00015171671,0.0011462467,0.001084629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017688441,0.00019393743,0.00024793323,0.0017814619,0.008397923,0.0038136586,0.000935138,0.00062245206,0.01338033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004204128,0.0002540394,0.0001958918,0.0019221131,0.005029225,0.0014824268,0.0019429512,0.0013117478,0.0008119406],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035458154,0.00018500163,0.19682935,0.00022852409,0.0000541942,0.0024715688,0.42665824,0.0014980924,0.004925406,0.1999972,0.0111208,0.15567707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002202976,0.00010193183,0.5686872,0.00038453194,0.000016446587,0.00050795503,0.19017015,0.00071414455,0.00082611217,0.0038743645,0.23461822,0.00007703881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86396337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9458013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86396337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030276306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01876629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2736755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948017456","doi":"10.7202/1059285ar","title":"La Cour d’appel et la prestation compensatoire","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018368152631395917,"score_gpt":0.2915176205192371,"score_spread":0.27314946788784117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948017456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02846346,0.0027576014,0.008069539,0.012999838,0.00028246007,0.000051201252,0.00015176059,0.0000357486,0.94718826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7165295,0.0021708787,0.0021612328,0.0026759815,0.00031490572,0.00008020188,0.00011244223,0.00011044273,0.27584437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99391526,0.0013102219,0.00017797523,0.0010569879,0.0015766784,0.001962892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996512,0.0009381185,0.00035284442,0.0005076591,0.0012553204,0.00043409734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002797436,0.00052192126,0.00047929308,0.001321028,0.015085433,0.010892706,0.0015095033,0.003759178,0.03587327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006019757,0.0003518845,0.00068210304,0.0016918813,0.014715037,0.0057646562,0.0037193983,0.0047644996,0.0025980857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015289937,0.0000044089065,0.00040494374,0.000017055047,0.000004744622,0.00012599917,0.0047715358,0.000082918516,0.00010709587,0.9862975,0.0036387602,0.004529849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032799173,0.000044251636,0.0057398714,0.00035049152,0.00003291229,0.0003177582,0.011418793,0.00076919014,0.00065047026,0.21952301,0.7610548,0.00006558286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3140013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4648336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3140013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027131334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018439423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6243472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948205569","doi":"10.1515/9781773855714-038","title":"5.1 The Independence of the Judiciary","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Judicial independence; Statute; Law; Position (finance); Political science; Autonomy; Judicial discretion; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Supreme court; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.028515898475237507,"score_gpt":0.2377052668468951,"score_spread":0.2091893683716576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948205569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023431214,0.0037706152,0.0041270945,0.0062971916,0.00014716778,0.000019571518,0.000080225764,0.000014993471,0.96211195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90175503,0.0026608051,0.0025824623,0.002358242,0.0001856166,0.00003221297,0.00007890331,0.000021773076,0.09032492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961299,0.00060046127,0.00008197784,0.000401671,0.0015999492,0.0011861782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982224,0.0003840372,0.00011540905,0.00015687145,0.0007686772,0.00035254212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014300143,0.00022487773,0.00031821668,0.0010052243,0.0070059085,0.006294851,0.000941729,0.0015876491,0.0047111483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00294776,0.00022942794,0.00030091286,0.00093317777,0.016257538,0.0019497195,0.0020069783,0.0038624478,0.00079351093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003927646,0.0000032217874,0.0002895101,0.000014100024,0.0000015400096,0.000029161982,0.0013779468,0.00007166288,0.00008743536,0.9920244,0.002002159,0.0040949266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035576195,0.000042291394,0.0141269425,0.0005595195,0.000027284525,0.00027709347,0.0037152723,0.0008822092,0.000951826,0.33536062,0.6439684,0.0000528586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52786636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64140064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52786636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018821137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03331885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94982827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948418414","doi":"","title":"DU MARIAGE GAI A LA POLYGAMIE : TRIOMPHE DU DROIT A L'EGALITE?","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Lesbian; Same sex; Political science; Sociology; Law; Gender studies","score_opus":0.052718911929517276,"score_gpt":0.2779552513832206,"score_spread":0.2252363394537033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948418414","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12135584,0.32254338,0.0012004093,0.23041967,0.0037673945,0.0000320714,0.00024288974,0.0000781072,0.32036027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8075761,0.09593908,0.0007960963,0.019829698,0.00068933255,0.000016303022,0.00008511289,0.000047014473,0.07502134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998708,0.0003763671,0.000026270234,0.0001323122,0.00038731826,0.00036968107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992423,0.00020776599,0.00009280259,0.000056154706,0.00025006046,0.00015092711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013437504,0.00025046218,0.00033134874,0.000828903,0.006592129,0.004389991,0.0008759988,0.0013851469,0.0052581904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034302494,0.00014592391,0.00017140983,0.0012121577,0.009172955,0.0021688815,0.0013670003,0.0026282656,0.00061294826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070595066,0.000030940508,0.010687417,0.00046844207,0.00004229413,0.0009720574,0.061430737,0.00013503256,0.0005417532,0.613577,0.11762698,0.19441673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009630907,0.000019588453,0.01691122,0.00075990177,0.00002903856,0.0006765661,0.03389482,0.00009187409,0.0003111949,0.010209879,0.9370547,0.00003162265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8328942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89092374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1671058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014585565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01990451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3361798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948541102","doi":"","title":"LA COUR SUPREME FACE A LA VIE, FACE A LA MORT: DE VALEURS ET DE DROITS","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Autonomy; Dignity; Context (archaeology); Law; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Promotion (chess); Foundation (evidence); Sociology; History; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.03626316724901889,"score_gpt":0.3469324294718574,"score_spread":0.31066926222283847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948541102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036452036,0.122686006,0.0014136763,0.17840888,0.0033184313,0.000030413587,0.00023955699,0.00006423121,0.6573868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7259372,0.02678415,0.000917526,0.020048855,0.0014219957,0.00002878554,0.00008677349,0.00007584725,0.22469881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964573,0.0008428533,0.00007757256,0.0002590093,0.0016794957,0.0006837804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971852,0.0010212712,0.00017127451,0.00009691991,0.0012267521,0.00029859954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025153703,0.0003217953,0.00043069976,0.001577007,0.010570519,0.009752839,0.0008987281,0.0032753104,0.0067479555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00753429,0.00025866256,0.0002283551,0.0015270908,0.013692228,0.0026820747,0.0013787767,0.0044759507,0.00060977926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018453631,0.000008987845,0.0009958701,0.00007325469,0.0000073822375,0.00028070735,0.00873161,0.00011680931,0.00012257234,0.8701519,0.09147765,0.028014777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008487916,0.00001432562,0.003623772,0.0003449577,0.0000099406,0.0002255974,0.0068874056,0.00010360081,0.00016461592,0.031006696,0.95757556,0.000035051296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8473318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9152492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15266818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0342431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032089166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3071345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948682131","doi":"","title":"THE CHANGING FAMILY, RIGHTS DISCOURSE AND THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Family law; Common law; Public law; Jurisprudence; Fundamental rights; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.02986626369755888,"score_gpt":0.293839664566131,"score_spread":0.2639734008685721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948682131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07648874,0.2118044,0.0005273748,0.34255186,0.001663698,0.000023036606,0.00020546358,0.000040355848,0.3666951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90023464,0.044366214,0.0003679902,0.023157591,0.00046533628,0.000016715034,0.00006599673,0.000029616454,0.03129592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937627,0.0012463534,0.00012135051,0.0005204133,0.0024790338,0.0018701989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926523,0.0027832729,0.0005273831,0.00014085657,0.002752571,0.0011436186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035688707,0.00024911328,0.00042406682,0.0030546044,0.028437994,0.013381028,0.0019047599,0.004875959,0.0035005982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010520947,0.00027588263,0.00022433336,0.004999767,0.029373338,0.0035106526,0.00219285,0.00432721,0.00023128207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011857156,0.000015451953,0.0020171741,0.00013371193,0.000010301576,0.00032289498,0.020932028,0.00028005004,0.00010917341,0.88837904,0.061467644,0.026320662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001941022,0.0000190304,0.026422469,0.0012857789,0.000043127486,0.00019531335,0.03984339,0.00047969044,0.00020220147,0.0710267,0.86036175,0.00010109597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9912486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99348795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82213175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17786823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17810717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9535563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949095073","doi":"","title":"Renewing the Senate under the Section 44 Amending Formula","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Constitution; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.06090359026998563,"score_gpt":0.32955439957297933,"score_spread":0.2686508093029937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949095073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018819982,0.04266729,0.009114515,0.16344447,0.067429155,0.0011907375,0.0063279313,0.0010045678,0.6900013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21174648,0.035571195,0.028540546,0.39173767,0.011168852,0.0027897093,0.0055234744,0.0005020074,0.3124201],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9750513,0.005206721,0.0030101733,0.0018598967,0.011015294,0.003856698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9738809,0.006784388,0.0014371112,0.002439857,0.0142237125,0.0012340351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01899975,0.0006052566,0.0010488109,0.0033336005,0.008396795,0.007029753,0.0023631228,0.009760362,0.009478261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05196869,0.001117988,0.0018152283,0.00459428,0.0071415347,0.003735901,0.0034416248,0.010540131,0.0042944755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006244144,0.000035093748,0.002012241,0.0007044161,0.000057558325,0.0003889779,0.0019171897,0.0002886352,0.0009611631,0.4524368,0.48902172,0.052113842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021861462,0.00002645777,0.003990821,0.0005177244,0.00006178844,0.00012356056,0.0002617344,0.000042028303,0.00032028058,0.0044997884,0.99008197,0.00005201992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44626123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5332325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9856842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014315806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.078042336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8873274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949321733","doi":"","title":"Raising The Bar: A Risk Assessment Checklist When Supervised Access Is Being Considered in Child Custody Disputes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Permission; Checklist; Raising (metalworking); Law; Child custody; Psychology; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.09081052179752669,"score_gpt":0.4151050533864316,"score_spread":0.3242945315889049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949321733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7654258,0.0032503873,0.06282563,0.030100143,0.0027215602,0.023565857,0.013161295,0.004138229,0.094811134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6744289,0.0057211453,0.26222372,0.0033930491,0.00062706403,0.021059575,0.007459862,0.00038504886,0.024701668],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897503,0.004500924,0.002596273,0.00021402654,0.0022889657,0.00064945314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96132255,0.018237084,0.008391639,0.000841886,0.008481192,0.0027257395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015329146,0.0009166285,0.0010880864,0.005805779,0.002615211,0.0023990292,0.0033211207,0.0022992415,0.009090795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0560833,0.00070977525,0.001513148,0.0015534866,0.0007165894,0.0036246188,0.0040997188,0.0027587058,0.0032048253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009230242,0.0027419494,0.1920415,0.002980471,0.00022120205,0.0061467937,0.037757974,0.0032892837,0.00415134,0.0067301434,0.33597663,0.4070396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007016405,0.0030909732,0.53559285,0.0094950395,0.0005138879,0.01810421,0.09148612,0.023204708,0.009265392,0.016900243,0.28997728,0.00166763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059946533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019035809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015329146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002155496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060000597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08106929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951516196","doi":"10.24908/fede.v20i1.13222","title":"The Charter of Rights and Freedoms: Undermining Parliamentary Sovereignty and Federalism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federalism-E","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Parliamentary sovereignty; Federalism; Charter; Parliament; Sovereignty; Law; Political science; Politics; Democracy; Bill of rights; Supreme court; Autonomy; Popular sovereignty; Public administration; Constitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.018585325360108446,"score_gpt":0.27548232395734273,"score_spread":0.2568969985972343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951516196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120584406,0.009583844,0.0076605226,0.18681777,0.0009481385,0.00005271071,0.00009641129,0.000070020404,0.6741862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704732,0.0015861669,0.0011343259,0.006675306,0.00012813347,0.000015308617,0.000021293105,0.000017928607,0.019948358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99203706,0.0019632059,0.000107481945,0.00047307124,0.0024270397,0.0029920773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99592197,0.001686308,0.0002998125,0.00026399028,0.0010885556,0.0007394258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049914974,0.00022165994,0.00034940027,0.0014683324,0.020225544,0.011169055,0.0011267279,0.0029489263,0.0023057065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010201883,0.00024000242,0.00028659028,0.0016121806,0.044023085,0.0040865927,0.0045080613,0.0053088805,0.00013865491],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055542464,0.0000038111318,0.00042799802,0.00001183879,0.0000015043139,0.000031588028,0.0068361447,0.0001488732,0.00006262786,0.9827597,0.0038957715,0.0058144755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047256344,0.000030533345,0.0110973,0.0003958637,0.000030883366,0.00012558814,0.022570517,0.0016229698,0.0007732647,0.4241282,0.5390832,0.000094395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9606092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97328496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9044721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09552792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15442511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6931068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952703545","doi":"10.29173/alr2520","title":"The Tin Ear of the Court: Ktunaxa Nation and the Foundation of the Duty to Consult","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Duty; Sovereignty; Political science; Jurisprudence; Jurisdiction; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02134618685211727,"score_gpt":0.3058841914587804,"score_spread":0.2845380046066631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952703545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036621943,0.03863895,0.0021442592,0.17005514,0.0015211891,0.00005332818,0.00008393278,0.000029286099,0.7508519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8119134,0.01347306,0.0010979567,0.046226606,0.00047457474,0.000079788464,0.000058162936,0.000029656421,0.1266468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99461454,0.0012220807,0.00015415336,0.00048002927,0.0019507237,0.0015785169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99651885,0.0016566187,0.00019825928,0.00015962015,0.0011152887,0.00035144927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040634884,0.00015665713,0.00044116648,0.0011487965,0.017932672,0.011364821,0.0016326288,0.0077814083,0.0053122807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008454344,0.00031357846,0.00034596206,0.0015018558,0.016549202,0.0050605936,0.0030011896,0.0091637885,0.00043064103],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005072889,0.0000057975058,0.0003211552,0.00002848314,0.0000023108328,0.00017395389,0.0020494345,0.000053283646,0.000055451575,0.98269063,0.010458227,0.004156214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033226956,0.00003498902,0.00803506,0.0013997117,0.00004327388,0.00041766517,0.013463127,0.0006183349,0.00032793704,0.31419653,0.6613512,0.000078919846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70928437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77591556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29071563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035473455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07805599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58485544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953615714","doi":"10.82308/7567","title":"Religiously discordant, legally consistent, and ethically ambiguous: The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario's approach to conscientious objection","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Conscientious objector; Conscience; Political science; Law; Beneficence; Autonomy; Jurisprudence; Consistency (knowledge bases); Economic Justice; Sociology; Philosophy; Spanish Civil War","score_opus":0.03217675930829157,"score_gpt":0.3104745099938368,"score_spread":0.27829775068554524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953615714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099499695,0.011506571,0.004266036,0.2738322,0.0016911202,0.00019147986,0.000104125946,0.000031356427,0.6088774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94423825,0.0028783318,0.0012509015,0.01609876,0.00042908615,0.00010017792,0.000024386683,0.000026398133,0.03495369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886397,0.0038911921,0.000328397,0.00081992836,0.003737176,0.002583629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916161,0.004122617,0.00090002024,0.0005093521,0.0014103915,0.0014415692],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00820795,0.00041811974,0.00038176746,0.0018548259,0.023007618,0.0115679,0.0022348834,0.0065460624,0.0025626277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013879043,0.00049765443,0.0004097225,0.0017797388,0.072053045,0.0030979307,0.0064556613,0.00612456,0.00022540193],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002464669,0.000014909648,0.0026958124,0.00008156334,0.000010165305,0.00045952876,0.09284181,0.00022534282,0.00019281617,0.8819455,0.01378831,0.00771946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096047486,0.00003512787,0.020056054,0.0010785848,0.000055119417,0.00036385682,0.11075065,0.00060140446,0.00028408933,0.28966594,0.57688195,0.00013122364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8713584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94448376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97699237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.112518884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17401771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81638545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953789955","doi":"10.82308/26611","title":"Law at L'Arche : reflections from a critical legal pluralist perspective","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive dissonance; Perspective (graphical); Normative; Sociology; Order (exchange); Everyday life; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Art; Philosophy; Visual arts; Business","score_opus":0.06535000660329707,"score_gpt":0.3631404626925198,"score_spread":0.2977904560892227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953789955","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16984081,0.013067078,0.007533789,0.5652895,0.0011769306,0.00007851694,0.00006552883,0.00007256459,0.24287532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725084,0.002107974,0.0008023457,0.013830562,0.00031527088,0.000044083983,0.000008573875,0.000031918637,0.010351032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98745316,0.008705827,0.00010749349,0.00059041416,0.0013648758,0.0017782521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843754,0.011196622,0.0007660304,0.0004929006,0.0016226099,0.0015464429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013496703,0.0005751616,0.0005114283,0.0016814884,0.03855594,0.0176441,0.0031706777,0.008362273,0.003336653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016080074,0.00045305895,0.00042544713,0.0016588334,0.11556214,0.009278168,0.007177538,0.0123334685,0.00022477571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010672606,0.000025464718,0.0004572926,0.00005359003,0.000004119587,0.00049523555,0.3946132,0.00015598837,0.00014816577,0.5914078,0.008836513,0.003792022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021684162,0.000027070537,0.001462871,0.000490221,0.000012285927,0.00032259326,0.5537716,0.00038123495,0.00051391945,0.14353947,0.29940486,0.00005211527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4738017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5205289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4738017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056322046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028030058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94208777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954590437","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1372","title":"Chief Justice McLachlin and the Division of Powers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Federalism; Economic Justice; Political science; CLARITY; Rigour; Judicial review; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027869817210957087,"score_gpt":0.32689943396874566,"score_spread":0.29902961675778855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954590437","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071201106,0.10373131,0.0011015051,0.6944719,0.003881338,0.000056483477,0.00019224014,0.000047416343,0.1893977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33431828,0.03578516,0.002019925,0.460885,0.0041591804,0.00011881544,0.00010969461,0.00005381763,0.1625501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924414,0.0012828889,0.0002157445,0.0011040336,0.0031498505,0.0018060948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992109,0.0029580959,0.0003894437,0.00022923666,0.0034000427,0.00091421534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004072926,0.000288357,0.00042373,0.0017943366,0.015082939,0.0074183666,0.0019557907,0.0072108596,0.0049205166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01320842,0.00037012453,0.0003984464,0.0018598982,0.013380638,0.0026649588,0.0019121615,0.007451377,0.00067616143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012125799,0.000009374953,0.0006608281,0.0001245548,0.0000078984185,0.00014361487,0.0025377832,0.00012487605,0.00012245958,0.6202406,0.36088926,0.015126586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012823666,0.000013491969,0.002553317,0.00030776623,0.0000134485745,0.00008559019,0.0020307885,0.00013771773,0.0001787751,0.035565916,0.95906866,0.000031685046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8643175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.927961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94493884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05506117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08884878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39949864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954595328","doi":"","title":"2001. 04. 060. Тэтли У. Канадcкая оценка американской теории и практики международного частного права в свете американской правовой и социальной систем. Tetley W. A Canadian looks at American conflict of law theory and practice, especially in the light of the American legal and social systems (corrective vs. distributive justice) // Columbia J. of transn. Law. N. Y. , 1999. Vol. 35, №2. P. 299 373","year":2001,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Сер. 4, Государство и право: Реферативный журнал","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Distributive justice; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.021521986222681828,"score_gpt":0.29455999293048535,"score_spread":0.27303800670780354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954595328","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006099856,0.0044262987,0.0005713965,0.010499533,0.0023334434,0.000120136036,0.009044497,0.0012060957,0.97118855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038827076,0.0018283714,0.00028716162,0.0013244268,0.00035803168,0.00009403306,0.0017721058,0.0002488262,0.99020433],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996057,0.000039434264,0.000025650654,0.00006207692,0.00014582228,0.00012133584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998985,0.0001781712,0.000084303254,0.000093133654,0.00037651742,0.00028281135],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094032136,0.0011912442,0.0007637379,0.0016290109,0.0023953654,0.0065194224,0.0017072262,0.0068506645,0.8969831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024160852,0.0008413422,0.00058621255,0.0020642006,0.0012527191,0.0035618441,0.0020299503,0.003154264,0.86642635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013949675,0.00008470796,0.0003511513,0.00030143384,0.0000074869063,0.00018331608,0.00021064184,0.000033277247,0.00021934033,0.011707136,0.86735463,0.119407415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006560009,0.00004180279,0.0024649187,0.00054962013,0.000010035473,0.00034520208,0.00029190638,0.000078283934,0.00013659864,0.0043214154,0.9916747,0.000020011343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0110171605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0155546125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98898286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016817589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020120745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14694113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954618050","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Crown's Duty to Consult Indigenous Nations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Indigenous Policy Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Crown (dentistry); Duty; Political science; History; Law; Medicine; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.034652781082583184,"score_gpt":0.3764283289887701,"score_spread":0.3417755479061869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954618050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018457156,0.005263342,0.0004573496,0.43369767,0.0069943764,0.000114034185,0.00049514475,0.000083858664,0.534437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2617845,0.0036957208,0.0020411557,0.16399387,0.0011008364,0.00011769554,0.00017797497,0.00013070591,0.56695753],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98916256,0.0008302308,0.0003248124,0.0006864521,0.0051194695,0.0038763483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98124886,0.0030324298,0.0004663692,0.0007409853,0.009531391,0.004980016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005135329,0.00040777793,0.00069146114,0.001622054,0.043548286,0.01324552,0.002660772,0.017683923,0.022191668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021081923,0.0006665346,0.0006648923,0.0021978794,0.010561202,0.002942183,0.004347533,0.015018028,0.0015701528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032671163,0.000040974683,0.0017741226,0.000106808184,0.000023396931,0.00034374624,0.009285775,0.00016412004,0.00030247762,0.29321015,0.67900497,0.015710834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018797095,0.000007545923,0.0046519334,0.00020680623,0.000017596309,0.000101082514,0.007123971,0.0001272179,0.0001258069,0.008441034,0.9791156,0.000062474406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9900491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99469274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9326374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06736261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32189685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4887522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962550307","doi":"","title":"Safe Havens or Dangerous Waters? A Phenomenological Study of Abused Women's Experiences in the Family Courts of Ontario","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Criminology; Thematic analysis; Child abuse; Narrative; Grounded theory; Psychology; Qualitative research; Political science; Social psychology; Poison control; Sociology; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Social science; Environmental health","score_opus":0.0565875361796769,"score_gpt":0.32577708060183114,"score_spread":0.26918954442215426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962550307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835301,0.0014484505,0.00029412666,0.0036984289,0.00006481966,0.00009002992,0.00010374483,0.00000845417,0.010761863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914522,0.0018987606,0.00021432423,0.00073740387,0.000015245281,0.00007613196,0.000040154588,0.000016921127,0.0055488036],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956333,0.0019280219,0.00017269934,0.00030431032,0.0007063938,0.0012552437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949142,0.0024396882,0.00077084097,0.00017492686,0.0006897337,0.001010715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029750736,0.0006351107,0.0010255782,0.0016620284,0.03410597,0.0063251653,0.0024233067,0.0021987737,0.0027568948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009231294,0.0008928282,0.00037878213,0.0040722894,0.01974567,0.0039728093,0.005769309,0.0028036293,0.0002009072],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007507811,0.000004947532,0.001550496,0.000025141915,0.0000012835485,0.0006141496,0.9963425,0.0000088695015,0.00014789948,0.00039154667,0.00026164798,0.0006440837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.926287e-7,0.000007856837,0.0020876692,0.000057525966,0.00000194942,0.00013464197,0.99034345,0.00001109603,0.00003311109,0.000052046267,0.0072641284,0.0000056566173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7989358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.908714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20106423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04379002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034694776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4044966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962753507","doi":"","title":"Guides: Canadian Law: Historical","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0837705783029093,"score_gpt":0.33300610988485996,"score_spread":0.24923553158195066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962753507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025302481,0.011199329,0.00065775163,0.018145258,0.001412927,0.00016617599,0.006234055,0.0003597679,0.95929444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009977245,0.003987527,0.00078714115,0.0023914396,0.00011415498,0.00006755125,0.0010283468,0.0001509586,0.98149556],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786913,0.00015074543,0.000081238424,0.0001845248,0.0012043135,0.0005100776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963253,0.000391983,0.00006981921,0.00015255169,0.002702767,0.00035754198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002008293,0.0008435795,0.00051983824,0.0062335804,0.016745387,0.012573174,0.0020871141,0.0047911187,0.12978874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005338063,0.0007740411,0.0004585915,0.01177893,0.004178663,0.003659005,0.0019959991,0.004005154,0.013167457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007772414,0.000020561416,0.00035924063,0.00009130397,0.0000019079916,0.000047636335,0.0010848956,0.00008245952,0.000035730063,0.11092624,0.86432683,0.023015406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002292183,0.0000013667084,0.00086645246,0.000110231,0.0000020259931,0.000015315716,0.00080114574,0.000035248748,0.00004161624,0.001981112,0.99613166,0.000011385832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98402506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9936307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12978874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.081474245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19390081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5911398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963028133","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Law at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Indigenous; Law; Political science; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.015284115282293956,"score_gpt":0.2568453366415863,"score_spread":0.24156122135929237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963028133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16929881,0.0067856056,0.0012193146,0.100136355,0.0009593136,0.00015566303,0.0005619885,0.00008587851,0.72079706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70049095,0.0019448858,0.0009242446,0.030647064,0.00022064014,0.00008100851,0.00008611057,0.000075226046,0.26552996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935742,0.00061822956,0.000093256494,0.0006078843,0.0016665634,0.0034398653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953668,0.0012057946,0.00013280335,0.00017761868,0.0019053133,0.0012117348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034574333,0.00034605843,0.00060950534,0.0012501975,0.054631896,0.0125049995,0.0028517463,0.010277591,0.012543757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0097966995,0.0006332054,0.00051621103,0.0018195187,0.009967978,0.0025096224,0.0036263533,0.0116582345,0.00059682404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052044055,0.000053923086,0.0055457624,0.00005876328,0.00004200896,0.00076122355,0.015758365,0.0005864806,0.00033443965,0.87374455,0.091825694,0.011236731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007589503,0.00004840089,0.023514772,0.0006863587,0.00020602587,0.00033290533,0.041144095,0.0023541348,0.0013563308,0.11645173,0.813555,0.0002743664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99728334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090302296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.090302296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20577595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6551921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963430694","doi":"","title":"Some Facts Concerning Life Insurance in South-Western Saskatchewan1","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Agriculture","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Life insurance; Actuarial science; Business","score_opus":0.03060149809904214,"score_gpt":0.2742580308001101,"score_spread":0.24365653270106793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963430694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9262927,0.0026654224,0.00020683809,0.027680598,0.00018653594,0.000029080285,0.00067331723,0.000009048086,0.042256426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730478,0.00265837,0.00026781086,0.011423937,0.00012605256,0.000030349389,0.0003589508,0.000015822183,0.012070951],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824417,0.0005276386,0.00015229896,0.00014550249,0.00025366765,0.0006766474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98680633,0.008447079,0.0015288203,0.00046780356,0.0015822331,0.0011677614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027692823,0.00020442717,0.0002614644,0.0020201143,0.006950862,0.0034607667,0.0013253468,0.0021391374,0.0055046882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007997095,0.00032033524,0.00021805342,0.006871918,0.0047481437,0.0013626551,0.0027228505,0.0030959963,0.0002691474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004369704,0.00018806217,0.44412404,0.00075354223,0.00016007198,0.01577592,0.3854508,0.00069237576,0.0042384504,0.060737535,0.040281132,0.04716111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017806959,0.000062589694,0.5161847,0.0005929059,0.00007674415,0.001287569,0.36813518,0.00021350587,0.0009788921,0.004214947,0.10812267,0.000112520785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85092497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9549744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14907503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014029486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01589531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2999059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963500614","doi":"","title":"\"DEBUNKING\" PARENTS' RIGHTS IN THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Context (archaeology); Fundamental rights; International human rights law; State (computer science); Embodied cognition; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07374014167730078,"score_gpt":0.31261404904336976,"score_spread":0.23887390736606898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963500614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.149712,0.048691798,0.0036682652,0.14443776,0.0013202586,0.00007376586,0.00047495536,0.000085051724,0.6515362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9600841,0.011699106,0.0011969177,0.009255188,0.00019154463,0.000020042153,0.000064759326,0.000027912549,0.017460458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99178165,0.0014991922,0.00018789177,0.0007858723,0.0031938981,0.0025516204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99256635,0.0030733591,0.00035215545,0.0003313767,0.0030543176,0.0006225372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007183405,0.00028346144,0.00041980337,0.0025243822,0.02282028,0.011275995,0.0020155772,0.0035377012,0.0026639819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013136798,0.00034941875,0.0003091708,0.0032923378,0.033487033,0.0026831487,0.0025963145,0.0050567705,0.00013009408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075964963,0.0000039894135,0.0013740691,0.000049393486,0.0000060138645,0.00021894755,0.017458353,0.00027059735,0.00012763147,0.9522135,0.01393234,0.014337517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030283969,0.000018563009,0.02227178,0.0010916326,0.0001244057,0.0003243502,0.048636965,0.0009253312,0.0008553806,0.14156523,0.7839753,0.00018069394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99568826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13228127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13228127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18174314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9597723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963809417","doi":"10.29173/alr2549","title":"The Right to Be Heard: Representative Authority as a Requirement in Enforcing Métis Consultation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Duty; Honour; Law; Statute; Corporate governance; Indigenous; Political science; Public administration; Business; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.044674300662804645,"score_gpt":0.3861197916134548,"score_spread":0.34144549095065013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963809417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079765104,0.0050891005,0.012804396,0.22013262,0.0012340312,0.00039242534,0.00013249497,0.00012729128,0.6803225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9148057,0.00082219276,0.004490534,0.033632293,0.0002589687,0.00015288248,0.000042556527,0.000051822193,0.04574298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93389946,0.02436027,0.0030848335,0.0049076695,0.021086851,0.012660959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9214493,0.044743285,0.0034331703,0.004870105,0.017775232,0.007728853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052718308,0.00020347215,0.0006666734,0.0013945465,0.022973262,0.01786534,0.0041282303,0.014245877,0.0051922565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.087746575,0.00081895175,0.0005236424,0.0016402822,0.036098756,0.006278087,0.0073528085,0.012205877,0.0006281108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022240318,0.000024221383,0.0019757939,0.0000894949,0.000011831632,0.0006269038,0.030950513,0.0002210384,0.0005116737,0.93461823,0.019242268,0.011705767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013073847,0.00010528711,0.016514173,0.0016002265,0.00009897904,0.00089266954,0.052196182,0.0014361284,0.0016642031,0.25327381,0.67182916,0.00025842877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70801854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.818763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29198146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048187856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1542694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.587402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964870267","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0037","title":"Section 7: The Right to Life, Liberty, and Security of the Person","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Charter; Political science; Law; Liberalism; State (computer science); Social security; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.031375601243637266,"score_gpt":0.23977877363860955,"score_spread":0.2084031723949723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964870267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052217008,0.011729078,0.0034151848,0.034626704,0.0012642953,0.000055099892,0.00011569899,0.000025960811,0.9435463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46501523,0.029373555,0.007221936,0.064791545,0.0042414432,0.0004444085,0.0005686674,0.00017663885,0.42816663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994995,0.0017603298,0.00022259625,0.00046422653,0.0019239858,0.00063372665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965502,0.0017235845,0.00015883568,0.00025644447,0.0011208174,0.00019002856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005077818,0.00039700148,0.0005437225,0.0010291546,0.0046043415,0.0064991377,0.0011783773,0.006279934,0.0057139476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003997065,0.00036354712,0.00043669555,0.00069979555,0.022179626,0.0034948988,0.0028655054,0.009149439,0.0021810844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020702976,0.0000041567355,0.00004356465,0.00002284762,9.240243e-7,0.000030848772,0.002101983,0.000035435613,0.0000746911,0.98575354,0.009511566,0.002418354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064575133,0.00001883445,0.00051990116,0.000840576,0.000008415225,0.00015219451,0.002297008,0.00010535833,0.00044863528,0.40866303,0.5869195,0.000020092979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03554426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029129012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03554426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071889674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014743437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07067478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964931682","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0045","title":"Feminist Constitutionalism in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Autonomy; Constitution; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Law; Constitutional law; Fundamental rights; Democracy; Human rights; Sociology; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.0427673660870517,"score_gpt":0.2491853511249828,"score_spread":0.2064179850379311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964931682","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01574538,0.01404548,0.0012274319,0.04795539,0.000810909,0.00005103435,0.0003122669,0.00005537835,0.91979665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6725761,0.012754611,0.002299759,0.012533473,0.00026954556,0.00008033254,0.00022081181,0.00012314184,0.29914218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955857,0.00058292464,0.00006675247,0.00042403472,0.0018291521,0.0015114739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99734527,0.00072255085,0.00007594409,0.00010867601,0.0013153077,0.0004322633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026056564,0.00045291043,0.0004529499,0.0026427875,0.028472204,0.009359533,0.0014706488,0.0027113198,0.015815437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005372535,0.00032045163,0.00036271886,0.004549548,0.024882976,0.002180043,0.0028669965,0.004530606,0.0005663748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050723643,0.0000048990573,0.00026244984,0.000035205594,0.0000023534062,0.00010054768,0.008882756,0.00019576719,0.00006840284,0.9555366,0.026755525,0.008150456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063051516,0.0000041703333,0.0016692696,0.00020075709,0.00000612627,0.00005301529,0.007723075,0.00025958673,0.00011026514,0.04691462,0.94302106,0.000031782896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24461769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24461769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2197308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8761364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965910019","doi":"","title":"Pour une réforme du droit de la famille fondée sur les réalités sociales et juridiques actuelles","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"EspaceINRS (National Institute for Scientific Research (Canada))","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08710542111540506,"score_gpt":0.37213294390016033,"score_spread":0.2850275227847553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965910019","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041087944,0.02821125,0.013605449,0.47459903,0.0021596001,0.000110508474,0.0005071294,0.00013116475,0.4395879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7481698,0.016147118,0.011737988,0.045697268,0.0015701472,0.00027284975,0.00036855572,0.000098132936,0.1759382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868231,0.0071180486,0.00031415228,0.00094218814,0.0024766354,0.0023259267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831042,0.008840287,0.001257775,0.0017293673,0.0037648925,0.0013034742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01267756,0.00050647417,0.00066208857,0.0015944395,0.010961066,0.010126486,0.0019638566,0.005678242,0.029107576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026064103,0.0003630224,0.00080616574,0.0022107456,0.01261369,0.010173494,0.005989279,0.007002923,0.002787644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035597193,0.000038385162,0.0024063615,0.00014703356,0.000016070257,0.0001492593,0.017719455,0.00035816611,0.00016884203,0.91272163,0.032904483,0.033334624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025613079,0.000085096406,0.010767017,0.001549768,0.000031592543,0.00017870967,0.031322,0.00054750807,0.00047986236,0.12930013,0.82562965,0.00008287581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1807853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27458024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97942394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020576078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03322156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35946602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966131801","doi":"","title":"Broken Trust: Finding Our Way Out of the Damaged Relationship Through the Rebuilding of Indigenous Legal Institutions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Colonialism; Genocide; Indigenous rights; Political science; Law; Sociology; Constitution; Racism; Human rights; Politics; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.0735731297173332,"score_gpt":0.3658860709121214,"score_spread":0.2923129411947882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966131801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60207844,0.012215717,0.014106288,0.17702672,0.0012150613,0.00010565715,0.00008080352,0.00020774316,0.19296367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858127,0.0014395817,0.0010232228,0.0023878608,0.000044711585,0.000014567662,0.000013009716,0.000052770265,0.009211491],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906825,0.004611716,0.00015316471,0.00055106654,0.0015965961,0.0024049715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99138886,0.002335138,0.0009822984,0.0010322727,0.0014683744,0.0027929633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008997754,0.00038533282,0.000816169,0.0012788404,0.043849602,0.018518636,0.0027380877,0.0035221498,0.004223554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015987244,0.0005696067,0.00038818322,0.0013855612,0.081904456,0.019840406,0.017037831,0.012183568,0.000711746],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018396357,0.000024515624,0.0017920496,0.00004691858,0.000011110384,0.00049123896,0.8931913,0.0000810406,0.00023629241,0.08252678,0.005402364,0.016178014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075388125,0.00003498027,0.0023097142,0.00030479085,0.000019472476,0.00039852088,0.8221169,0.0002589814,0.00024139977,0.043459907,0.13079125,0.00005651204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.437259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4675108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.437259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026577197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046233937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8694277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966633239","doi":"","title":"Historical Infringements of Aboriginal Rights: Sui Generis as a Tool to Ignore the Past","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Supreme court; Law; Statutory law; Indigenous; Economic Justice; Political science; High Court; Faith; Human rights; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02444947449560265,"score_gpt":0.3442519138024815,"score_spread":0.31980243930687885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966633239","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044121775,0.84764445,0.0005258751,0.09426198,0.0011166908,0.00001808036,0.000018842604,0.000008998956,0.05199294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15154293,0.80743843,0.0012949405,0.029720807,0.0015850216,0.00003606262,0.000040024646,0.000015831467,0.00832587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994331,0.0019358606,0.00024854275,0.0004042013,0.0023668848,0.0007135288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994261,0.003011026,0.0004514771,0.00024468813,0.0016510094,0.0003807925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009853917,0.00032532448,0.00079193595,0.00494819,0.006011326,0.0087692505,0.0021977487,0.0048805326,0.001674881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009068384,0.00033428942,0.00054391276,0.004183402,0.040446956,0.0057208,0.0025959266,0.007651082,0.00023063092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011221623,0.000041179952,0.0010859726,0.001928976,0.000031026917,0.0005116819,0.019307936,0.00018957017,0.00025403677,0.80187213,0.027210698,0.14755549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012522179,0.00004478915,0.0058553945,0.007961863,0.00006209551,0.00056175207,0.013543533,0.00011572626,0.0002112352,0.06407858,0.90750355,0.000049005084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5138247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67980796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4861753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03829176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.070665754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.978077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967130248","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v30i2.1701","title":"‘CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION? INTERPRETATION, (MIS)CALCULATION, WRONGS RIGHTED OR REACTION &amp; REITERATION’","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Referendum; Aotearoa; Law; Political science; Entitlement (fair division); Context (archaeology); Politics; Brexit; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; European union; History","score_opus":0.05316565827189108,"score_gpt":0.34108904335866214,"score_spread":0.28792338508677107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967130248","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007978489,0.011684429,0.03092803,0.5824643,0.016147945,0.00008419725,0.0001542721,0.00030531661,0.35025305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63455135,0.0071315533,0.023188874,0.1729447,0.0102290725,0.0003178715,0.00019364267,0.0012826965,0.15016013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9458409,0.033473887,0.0020764626,0.0046213004,0.011182453,0.00280494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97537327,0.015486649,0.0016833314,0.0041159526,0.0028673073,0.00047359822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026286425,0.00083811715,0.00069735723,0.0016538453,0.007642741,0.016015692,0.0027990097,0.010823497,0.007156515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06794318,0.00062582665,0.0005877911,0.0017118974,0.064157344,0.018994957,0.007118058,0.018015256,0.0034254799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057722223,0.000004052777,0.000090584086,0.000043313594,0.000004314817,0.00010554378,0.011442945,0.000056914454,0.00008789647,0.92674965,0.05273082,0.008678187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010475457,0.000006899025,0.00018015952,0.000294722,0.000007087487,0.0002129219,0.0063870484,0.00021665519,0.0004743064,0.3882668,0.6039011,0.000041776217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013733625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0136699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026286425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009646371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0095290225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13901758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967599921","doi":"10.4324/9780203720028-7","title":"Judging gender: difference and dissent at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.041261172417284574,"score_gpt":0.2622390219272764,"score_spread":0.2209778495099918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967599921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20566574,0.006193659,0.0014826419,0.062427856,0.0011542318,0.000087050874,0.00029493868,0.000036068835,0.7226579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90466136,0.0012284545,0.0006095696,0.0058136038,0.00013121331,0.000025316922,0.000056352183,0.00004282823,0.087431274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99191076,0.0011308917,0.0001284497,0.00067928224,0.003018449,0.0031322166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935759,0.0024026057,0.00018332887,0.00015557314,0.0024673631,0.0012151685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005064699,0.00040320662,0.000680401,0.0022704192,0.039963048,0.011915105,0.002712394,0.0062985388,0.01023273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020243555,0.00041105933,0.0004747239,0.0029511407,0.017615303,0.0030811632,0.003057196,0.0094322255,0.0005470813],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009253733,0.000056426205,0.0072459104,0.000054312903,0.000040349838,0.00065093744,0.051659323,0.00055590854,0.00034699566,0.8139816,0.09604911,0.029266637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087206856,0.000055802273,0.044830635,0.0007975866,0.00013313827,0.00035692754,0.17221892,0.0030956701,0.0018883115,0.33714506,0.43908122,0.00030952168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9770833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99301684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08387188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08387188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11327969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6085359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2968700249","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0039","title":"Equality and Anti-discrimination","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Supreme court; Law; Government (linguistics); Political science; State (computer science); Mathematics; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.07629487764963126,"score_gpt":0.29370194859290794,"score_spread":0.21740707094327666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2968700249","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034660134,0.0056297025,0.0012643622,0.009679708,0.0004524044,0.0000135904265,0.000024060986,0.00001241356,0.9794576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6488039,0.0078885695,0.0017139531,0.018077534,0.0006753515,0.000061333085,0.000085185864,0.00006468675,0.32262948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601823,0.0008579353,0.00005384235,0.00033652916,0.0018861262,0.00084745133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878067,0.0004616337,0.000054640255,0.000114736475,0.00044963235,0.00013874895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023889665,0.00027749364,0.0003297369,0.0011511779,0.0072716186,0.006143837,0.0012337303,0.0023709452,0.011710006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029147093,0.00017028188,0.00019017218,0.0010994802,0.027077882,0.0023028387,0.0025539023,0.0040037716,0.0009873671],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.939971e-7,0.0000017053362,0.000025787569,0.0000072781027,3.1394856e-7,0.000010557219,0.000899278,0.000022252565,0.00001842111,0.99236614,0.0037353744,0.0029122634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042346132,0.0000067746805,0.0007972148,0.00030056958,0.0000035309688,0.00005123631,0.0018642708,0.00013405523,0.0002481516,0.31281877,0.6837607,0.0000103658185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34183708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42448595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34183708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022042844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025357662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6796948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969098070","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0031","title":"The Justification of Rights Violations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Morality; Democracy; Politics; Proportionality (law); Section (typography); State (computer science); Law and economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Fundamental rights; Human rights; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.050801113420704785,"score_gpt":0.27328588798224135,"score_spread":0.22248477456153656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969098070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005660177,0.002510115,0.010425289,0.020451449,0.0005040571,0.00005114202,0.000050963674,0.000042609732,0.96030414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7868818,0.0038420681,0.006811731,0.01088902,0.00060892635,0.00019741345,0.000128684,0.00015569785,0.1904846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98413426,0.0063041067,0.00033058022,0.0009710244,0.0065459507,0.0017139566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883521,0.0066302405,0.0005623176,0.0010731702,0.00305912,0.00032298206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011690789,0.00045023166,0.0006933365,0.0024000225,0.0064501497,0.008213813,0.0027374367,0.006399044,0.013795579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028451847,0.00032772083,0.00037896776,0.0016432388,0.03585237,0.0063802507,0.0040522763,0.007474689,0.0013277422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010859277,0.0000017338072,0.000030758034,0.000010619884,8.529326e-7,0.000022973605,0.0009133769,0.000059392358,0.000018291892,0.99379116,0.0025276332,0.0026221087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066022913,0.000004959306,0.00030310283,0.00035417965,0.0000077321665,0.00007301274,0.0016654391,0.0005386591,0.00024550626,0.7814935,0.21529102,0.000016365735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.082623586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08694412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082623586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018734086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023349661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16428536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969398275","doi":"10.1093/he/9780191868306.003.0047","title":"Re Amendment to the Constitution of Canada [1981] 1 SCR 753, also known as the Patriation Reference, Supreme Court of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03262084511648393,"score_gpt":0.23383977884056287,"score_spread":0.20121893372407895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969398275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015838471,0.012629283,0.00062054524,0.022201322,0.002241852,0.00015398643,0.0017775579,0.00008030938,0.9587113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0463176,0.009416372,0.0016105949,0.025603047,0.0006595964,0.00018893484,0.0010349749,0.00015307634,0.91501576],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947119,0.00044273224,0.00016482137,0.00046530427,0.0029138876,0.0013014083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832433,0.00034126797,0.00008596069,0.00010834515,0.001001246,0.00013883192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00211141,0.0010683236,0.00060536276,0.0029147964,0.014987713,0.006327864,0.0026240929,0.009977332,0.0155636165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051576826,0.00084852776,0.0006156065,0.004953351,0.008249028,0.0018820498,0.0015607933,0.0069784815,0.003818816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009558525,0.000015198266,0.00022217327,0.00005984319,0.0000052168316,0.0001592679,0.0016168599,0.0002606259,0.00016104788,0.34425628,0.6445496,0.008684295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001057057,0.0000046770742,0.0012897876,0.00023191138,0.000008867963,0.000045201577,0.00059243385,0.00008889398,0.00015385232,0.010068835,0.98747045,0.000034440945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9799477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9915957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.908841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09115901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1338339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.661408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969750881","doi":"","title":"Canada's Chief Justice: Beverley McLachlin's Legacy of Law and Leadership","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04040969613000794,"score_gpt":0.2972481283106816,"score_spread":0.25683843218067365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969750881","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056633255,0.045355815,0.00033003752,0.85846204,0.009110516,0.000025430252,0.0004519139,0.00006780735,0.080532946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25696796,0.0594521,0.0014448821,0.41395608,0.005173545,0.00008194695,0.00045192544,0.00031962257,0.26215202],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934376,0.0006336966,0.0001192806,0.0006419049,0.0032023154,0.0019652867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860367,0.0022922133,0.0004305159,0.00032626104,0.0061607836,0.004753505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031685429,0.0006396028,0.00074055255,0.003344906,0.071010716,0.019209255,0.003255289,0.0076757222,0.010706296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012873002,0.0007129282,0.0003504481,0.007145528,0.017585991,0.0051601124,0.004373881,0.013617901,0.0013008807],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074364502,0.0000061907454,0.0005828182,0.00004663246,0.0000054254056,0.00015732557,0.008900313,0.000039623203,0.00005659698,0.023319595,0.9566025,0.010275626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047137887,0.0000032060195,0.0024993438,0.0002686771,0.000007299995,0.00007484675,0.021061938,0.000038886123,0.00006988637,0.003339819,0.9725906,0.000040691844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14726622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14726622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31439045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9890503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969897283","doi":"","title":"Individual Choice of Law for Indigenous People in Canada: Reconciling Legal Pluralism with Human Rights?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UC Irvine law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Indigenous; Pluralism (philosophy); Legal pluralism; Human rights; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law; Legal realism; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05001393962651693,"score_gpt":0.3356475473879512,"score_spread":0.2856336077614343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969897283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8029637,0.006160661,0.0007991061,0.10341758,0.0003506234,0.0001488198,0.00020242138,0.000026375192,0.08593069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815377,0.0015369359,0.00061787665,0.004958397,0.00004092863,0.000024696648,0.00003542297,0.000010980915,0.011236965],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956519,0.0005733567,0.00007926075,0.0002852556,0.00073424936,0.0026760548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970504,0.00053246523,0.00020514154,0.00009763641,0.000589751,0.0015245378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002784225,0.00025436003,0.00047238971,0.0014204166,0.030369123,0.0065921196,0.003958121,0.0035704242,0.006504143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054973476,0.0002979329,0.00034457337,0.0023711754,0.014213971,0.003135098,0.005621676,0.0045921216,0.00017276352],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009633282,0.00027769568,0.0792314,0.00034489913,0.000047839112,0.0031483746,0.61284286,0.00049229094,0.0006962485,0.18883136,0.022928638,0.09106198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025422078,0.000047874553,0.06876791,0.0007572407,0.000050988987,0.0006004314,0.79582375,0.0009886911,0.00028186024,0.017913967,0.11460885,0.00013309982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.997131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11052584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11052584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23175086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8019248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970285074","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Human Rights Act and First Nations Communities","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.022888260059927196,"score_gpt":0.2890834125710401,"score_spread":0.2661951525111129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970285074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019304551,0.01917635,0.00035792295,0.20021097,0.001122082,0.000045095032,0.00028337308,0.000024824027,0.7594749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74183863,0.016581621,0.00090730994,0.066623054,0.00056328555,0.000102189064,0.00023546412,0.00006396859,0.17308448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890531,0.0017164886,0.00011613217,0.0004685238,0.0042587426,0.0043870523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906854,0.0017885548,0.0005127603,0.00025817173,0.0030405272,0.0037145047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004431181,0.00039026144,0.00040335677,0.0026190183,0.0391993,0.010416387,0.0014152809,0.0066076852,0.014781929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012933457,0.0003001936,0.00034889035,0.0034609674,0.019768676,0.0043974086,0.0049907467,0.0058106687,0.00070205197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014972584,0.000027542,0.0023851877,0.000049247865,0.000006791854,0.00016408881,0.011316088,0.00011544869,0.000051480114,0.8272864,0.14320229,0.015380467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025872336,0.000016259706,0.01789018,0.000804755,0.000020292679,0.00013253755,0.030118985,0.00022551784,0.00012102972,0.07128248,0.87926245,0.00009975516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98281246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9919084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084024265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.084024265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2274904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60964155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970323928","doi":"","title":"CONFRONTING THE SEXUAL ASSAULT OF TEENAGE GIRLS:: THE MISTAKE OF AGE DEFENCE IN CANADIAN SEXUAL ASSAULT LAW","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Law Foundation of British Columbia","keywords":"Plaintiff; Mistake; Sexual assault; Psychology; Criminology; Law; Criminal code; Poison control; Criminal law; Suicide prevention; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.02481743643834859,"score_gpt":0.2801504322200895,"score_spread":0.2553329957817409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970323928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7877864,0.010984242,0.00081758335,0.052797787,0.0006130978,0.00011757609,0.00017035521,0.000038088463,0.14667486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98394036,0.0039034716,0.00042950187,0.0036418587,0.00004567154,0.000009578654,0.000031501266,0.0000124749895,0.007985684],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99599516,0.0006172892,0.00015590231,0.00025026276,0.0018463702,0.0011349745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99522483,0.0014357233,0.00073062564,0.00011969982,0.0016114723,0.0008776024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034557907,0.00023626666,0.00026937484,0.0015926204,0.01880747,0.003962116,0.0017935554,0.0026102108,0.0034361994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014117489,0.00029962292,0.0002998704,0.0018220873,0.007002529,0.0015791451,0.0030485755,0.0034047135,0.00018416629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006118112,0.00010082494,0.16164687,0.0004982039,0.00004203626,0.015400402,0.54728985,0.00031827023,0.0013999725,0.11535668,0.035425115,0.12246061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016883778,0.000069027825,0.1944784,0.0013299214,0.0000792395,0.009514255,0.5126672,0.0006202666,0.0010186462,0.00519541,0.27484995,0.00016087976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9843456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99325114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041582815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041582815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.082496196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30170584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970444144","doi":"10.59962/9780774880497","title":"Revisiting the Duty to Consult Aboriginal Peoples","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Geography; History; Genealogy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01764331129471004,"score_gpt":0.24363641030965458,"score_spread":0.22599309901494455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970444144","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012199703,0.015837127,0.0011547841,0.057218216,0.0023429773,0.000038352864,0.000030296444,0.000022921162,0.91115564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3458995,0.014170873,0.002281639,0.033081807,0.0007810862,0.00006766713,0.000055721375,0.00008172636,0.60357994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704427,0.00095526414,0.000060367638,0.00020186917,0.0011478385,0.0005904275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850047,0.00070176966,0.00004288946,0.00008247394,0.00050541025,0.00016708023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035812997,0.00029500577,0.00027926842,0.0014076212,0.016842261,0.0077606053,0.0014497477,0.0050676474,0.0050796326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004022996,0.0002937672,0.00028282896,0.0011308247,0.022946293,0.0043250616,0.004888673,0.0074099055,0.00085997424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033131937,0.000007096332,0.0001745258,0.00005420729,0.0000016143152,0.00036633428,0.07133573,0.00007361989,0.0000891814,0.8547384,0.060682897,0.0124730775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023887292,0.000005488466,0.0006754464,0.00039717462,0.0000048462566,0.00026457646,0.02932598,0.0001143521,0.00011592889,0.04652936,0.92255044,0.000013903926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63265127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7584095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36734873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03369592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04253093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7390242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970564397","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.31.2.05","title":"The <i>Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines</i>, Soft Law, and the Procedural Rule of Law","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.029884460921857023,"score_gpt":0.277993477525192,"score_spread":0.24810901660333495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970564397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029376173,0.0067540486,0.020650022,0.08855018,0.002150645,0.00011365622,0.00042244841,0.00021878975,0.851764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6546489,0.0049804673,0.01392879,0.05464733,0.001829964,0.00030769611,0.00034085594,0.00019442142,0.2691216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895326,0.0031826175,0.00081279775,0.0011531503,0.0036189707,0.001699966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838526,0.008619408,0.0020185243,0.0020828345,0.002603347,0.0008232135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078344215,0.0003735233,0.00031485883,0.0018279221,0.0060254144,0.010460045,0.0017664202,0.006658799,0.014713039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023527041,0.00061513024,0.0007377203,0.0018130919,0.0146840345,0.0055980813,0.0038801709,0.008820567,0.0031655126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010316194,0.000011346515,0.00067412254,0.00004323897,0.000003930667,0.000045724628,0.002419653,0.0000700308,0.000116265786,0.9637387,0.022648728,0.0102179535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027344213,0.000047049216,0.006897209,0.00078242505,0.000028766477,0.00019307846,0.003545953,0.00065056555,0.0008649974,0.22333913,0.76354736,0.000076141805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051273722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08012306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9487263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006822749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015133421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101950586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970692404","doi":"","title":"The revised statutes of New Brunswick","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03602712549478464,"score_gpt":0.31815376691785546,"score_spread":0.2821266414230708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970692404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013362066,0.008065907,0.0022374634,0.013442359,0.0035834545,0.00022427402,0.0020654362,0.00013374489,0.96891105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0057658083,0.0031090209,0.0021145898,0.0049478123,0.00012262378,0.0001976945,0.0006607065,0.0001406484,0.9829411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965718,0.00042922611,0.0002511045,0.00046344486,0.0015967187,0.0006877203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977932,0.0005962105,0.00008945182,0.00027147567,0.0011412343,0.00010836148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034469522,0.0009926925,0.00077480567,0.0035697948,0.006474378,0.010086911,0.003016941,0.0054901987,0.041487277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007787622,0.0014602231,0.0007879632,0.0071125575,0.004116551,0.004830659,0.0024440528,0.012019859,0.011734864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013735781,0.000017444985,0.00024108402,0.000067637295,0.0000050153462,0.00011144147,0.0012994296,0.00020458252,0.00017755675,0.5838863,0.386921,0.02705477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004776445,0.000001980143,0.0005377451,0.00014842585,0.000005434538,0.00003396742,0.00033351703,0.00005827281,0.000114333234,0.013639338,0.9851012,0.000020901927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7368091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8965821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26319093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042258676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05716783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52948177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970712014","doi":"10.5040/9781509914449.ch-013","title":"Cecilia Kell v Canada","year":2019,"lang":"hu","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.03967674830679355,"score_gpt":0.24763263293519538,"score_spread":0.20795588462840184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970712014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055492157,0.009215264,0.0003839816,0.09613718,0.0015426989,0.000054486794,0.00034813382,0.00008578845,0.8866833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08880484,0.0041010026,0.00047977915,0.08913995,0.00033064972,0.000056663423,0.00012566103,0.00009872403,0.81686276],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952426,0.00035445756,0.000050336483,0.00047978575,0.002078729,0.0017941592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789387,0.00046477228,0.0000802211,0.000087941604,0.0009769371,0.0004964365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016173841,0.00052091386,0.0003914178,0.0012009158,0.022941062,0.007363817,0.0014571873,0.008124501,0.030239714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052763014,0.0005556012,0.00045659332,0.0014611857,0.0060906447,0.002273491,0.002673615,0.008761694,0.0032970684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022326363,0.000011533492,0.0006276811,0.00006891138,0.000007210306,0.00030623615,0.0018807263,0.00009800403,0.00017225095,0.29608375,0.6862971,0.014424345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000079199635,0.000003972095,0.0008881311,0.00011899477,0.000006442717,0.000078127436,0.0011311782,0.00005665881,0.00014888466,0.0038793117,0.99365765,0.00002262917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97751075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99054515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06985766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06985766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1387869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50685513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W29715688","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.066","title":"Report on the Oral Arguments of the Appeal in Hupacasath First Nation v The Minister of Foreign Affairs Canada and the Attorney General of Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TDM","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Prime minister; Political science; Foreign policy; Politics","score_opus":0.02684060107857847,"score_gpt":0.25113462015173166,"score_spread":0.2242940190731532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W29715688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035574643,0.018915137,0.00069102785,0.19991985,0.15164705,0.0005930725,0.002846072,0.00047720748,0.6213531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0051569887,0.0023264915,0.00020998815,0.020864923,0.002849466,0.00004281338,0.0002622495,0.0001311477,0.96815586],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974068,0.00017332683,0.00007545086,0.00036514646,0.0013334899,0.00064575847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966273,0.00028938806,0.00007751657,0.00013320366,0.0021990607,0.0006736365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015069118,0.0008276102,0.00085284136,0.0011199717,0.009811836,0.00614223,0.0016712046,0.0074472693,0.1969612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058705676,0.00051899656,0.00058289693,0.0009840046,0.0013952088,0.0018357919,0.0027917032,0.0075233094,0.051082022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014637948,0.00001224803,0.00017557073,0.000028290287,0.0000026832809,0.00014472552,0.00009634024,0.000017199296,0.00012668059,0.0035728186,0.9890927,0.006716102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017117992,0.0000028125212,0.00023105975,0.000027502803,0.0000014147896,0.000035610454,0.00013500519,0.000016090371,0.000056147255,0.0001257282,0.99936134,0.000005555912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4230249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56032157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5769751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011803627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02962402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84112525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972230165","doi":"","title":"Feminism after the Critique of Feminism Review of Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Politics; Sociology; Visibility; Feminist philosophy; Gender studies; Feminist theory; Feminist legal theory; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.014713806864333073,"score_gpt":0.30707670279697225,"score_spread":0.2923628959326392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972230165","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016240958,0.2570041,0.0016245822,0.5719692,0.10863295,0.000020856467,0.00006899448,0.000042789467,0.059012398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12489964,0.1897071,0.00197074,0.24973807,0.2437316,0.00025237433,0.00013675539,0.000374854,0.18918891],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99500495,0.0026405817,0.00015179564,0.00034726097,0.0015457838,0.0003096581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891539,0.0083698295,0.0005902588,0.00023447018,0.0012941359,0.00035732903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048560183,0.00073695794,0.0007746329,0.0023078893,0.0051338673,0.007639466,0.0014590097,0.0054578716,0.006950595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014365171,0.00032897765,0.00061983836,0.0028115765,0.0105539495,0.0050368113,0.002247365,0.008651708,0.0017583048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018915249,0.000013138421,0.00012313512,0.00037679958,0.000009747234,0.000112468886,0.003918669,0.000106655054,0.00010944691,0.14918852,0.82535267,0.020669753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041096937,0.00000866979,0.00032851155,0.00090786046,0.0000040242976,0.00006459807,0.0014191864,0.000047275156,0.00006600773,0.020507993,0.9766343,0.000007384598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0091066165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013740492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0091066165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065442044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047481716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972266157","doi":"10.21991/cf29384","title":"The Crown and Government Formation: Conventions, Practices, Customs, and Norms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Politics; Law; Political science; Convention; Transparency (behavior); Crown (dentistry); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021239921858551752,"score_gpt":0.2886348179734638,"score_spread":0.2673948961149121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972266157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14845677,0.034210343,0.009942727,0.0880874,0.0006835595,0.00005518929,0.00022487817,0.00016484353,0.71817434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97695017,0.0047166455,0.0013884021,0.0018566191,0.0000879918,0.000019705978,0.000053711832,0.000058147274,0.014868543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907685,0.002793538,0.00032098536,0.000834128,0.0029154425,0.002367395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915279,0.0031533292,0.001059183,0.00080224645,0.0018550456,0.0016022726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007491833,0.0003622691,0.0005073816,0.0025419851,0.020636402,0.030376919,0.0022946869,0.0023968632,0.0038526321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011952964,0.00031124044,0.00024930644,0.0055392715,0.084266275,0.0078055714,0.0057379263,0.0047030235,0.00043126792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000098416895,0.0000067279893,0.0026535843,0.000047447622,0.0000046136533,0.0000876579,0.035043754,0.00019505521,0.00006665336,0.94185925,0.005697053,0.014328291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013333625,0.000019335552,0.033117227,0.0008636647,0.000025791001,0.0001699029,0.10327496,0.0010302308,0.00059274636,0.3339916,0.5267802,0.000121013625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89933604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9353311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9164654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08353458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08718498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60608864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974680420","doi":"10.1080/20403313.2019.1658450","title":"The place of instrumental reasoning in law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Constitution; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Political science; Public law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.012655365649978904,"score_gpt":0.30716618150991737,"score_spread":0.2945108158599385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974680420","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021965966,0.021390388,0.31759143,0.09156423,0.0012649703,0.00009165075,0.000117291085,0.00031002713,0.54570407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9274221,0.004850674,0.047933,0.0075528664,0.001774059,0.00024480495,0.00006559901,0.00019543499,0.009961425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97444737,0.018309029,0.0006496912,0.0025785707,0.002871593,0.00114378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9537118,0.035443947,0.0021025105,0.0056476966,0.0018921058,0.0012019635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028299987,0.0010018852,0.0014150059,0.003824538,0.006578756,0.015325036,0.0038720055,0.007237422,0.0042818827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025681717,0.0011226604,0.0016679642,0.0020623833,0.10508502,0.025117135,0.0082147615,0.014288916,0.0009002922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002759338,0.000002783076,0.00003280793,0.000011410893,0.0000023263474,0.000008620511,0.00039918663,0.00008679059,0.000011164892,0.9987061,0.00011869465,0.0006174265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009792956,0.000005133616,0.000032675856,0.000038417063,0.0000037442821,0.000013961883,0.00013887192,0.00039574687,0.000039654245,0.99402,0.005296562,0.000005464101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004360728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002173338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028299987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009642582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069382796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14966643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976173574","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v37i4.5583","title":"Recognising Multi-textualism: Rethinking New Zealand's Legal History","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty of Waitangi; Treaty; Project commissioning; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Publishing; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.043234437444675825,"score_gpt":0.27235618299210623,"score_spread":0.22912174554743042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2976173574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10995348,0.1324126,0.0077454527,0.24719816,0.0034156342,0.00013496334,0.0001729338,0.000060276678,0.49890655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.919339,0.038699962,0.0029767654,0.011699362,0.001214307,0.00013157961,0.00007895112,0.000116699324,0.025743509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98374593,0.0062698843,0.0010641941,0.0013293658,0.006390596,0.0012000487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9582261,0.02833667,0.0035560892,0.0020489239,0.006598335,0.0012339363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026539499,0.00035155288,0.0007841394,0.009968839,0.011870049,0.018403022,0.0028206327,0.00437407,0.0032288928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045594387,0.0006610797,0.0003913937,0.0073333723,0.04276696,0.022679335,0.00855084,0.006981304,0.00021741814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002055102,0.000011956591,0.0013993172,0.0005824697,0.000024175562,0.00060930045,0.15201144,0.00014896582,0.00028998876,0.7900087,0.010519083,0.04437409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022198405,0.00004375682,0.014184939,0.0040912605,0.00006230614,0.0005183489,0.08272803,0.00044449998,0.0003713866,0.11451592,0.7829415,0.000075748045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44840366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60807276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44840366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035216134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03563782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8915873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977953312","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Aboriginal Law & Indigenous Laws: Indigenous Laws and the Canadian Legal System","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Indigenous; Political science","score_opus":0.04452822510081191,"score_gpt":0.37253687841463345,"score_spread":0.32800865331382156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977953312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016193202,0.046868373,0.0012718933,0.13793452,0.005604411,0.0018521386,0.03635934,0.00029352974,0.7536226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07788927,0.066076905,0.004985991,0.015535773,0.0014236374,0.0014679265,0.011676331,0.00027953152,0.8206646],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720496,0.0003884223,0.00022471756,0.00021451309,0.0015591173,0.00040839796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733936,0.006786386,0.00053718477,0.0004135171,0.016599357,0.0022698834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004779589,0.00075098174,0.00067133835,0.009859781,0.018515652,0.00955776,0.0022151815,0.0042509157,0.08470167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018034346,0.0006829323,0.0003776125,0.019604027,0.0047289794,0.005038888,0.0020291575,0.0036556378,0.0067418534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015832025,0.00006221895,0.0023844615,0.0006669942,0.0000044436897,0.00007309144,0.012662143,0.00010810295,0.00008658361,0.038633324,0.8967677,0.048535034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001755951,0.000015151572,0.026305467,0.0022996743,0.000022465383,0.00005716573,0.053453,0.00010961463,0.0001249745,0.005603514,0.9119375,0.000054008655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.987575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99556965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08470167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060434777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27579704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43848705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978324001","doi":"","title":"Is Originalism Bad for Women? the Curious Case of Canada's \"Equal Rights Amendment.\"","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Ratification; Interpretation (philosophy); Charter; Constitution; Political science; Law; Original meaning; Meaning (existential); Politics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027682851914534415,"score_gpt":0.29895921376263684,"score_spread":0.27127636184810244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978324001","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042791307,0.01368666,0.0021974763,0.4769487,0.0021988451,0.000045842597,0.00019127606,0.000055958848,0.461884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7628673,0.0056500053,0.0011622793,0.10000591,0.00068297004,0.00005557434,0.000060594408,0.00008541922,0.12943007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928054,0.0017093819,0.00006964264,0.0006889906,0.0024597005,0.002266927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736553,0.0010822061,0.00017140649,0.00014557767,0.0007615516,0.00047367124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004261133,0.00039088103,0.00033642544,0.0010123401,0.035366405,0.009982623,0.0013520103,0.0046792943,0.0036554919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007395743,0.00021577034,0.00038224927,0.0015264838,0.042086497,0.003796594,0.0035124412,0.0072157225,0.00030674244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014489222,0.0000061300584,0.00063579116,0.000027919496,0.0000043551363,0.0002701369,0.030788088,0.000054688742,0.00007825669,0.9108506,0.047435064,0.009834488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020285548,0.00001276135,0.0030503226,0.00028875316,0.000021948137,0.00024399985,0.047401153,0.0001902603,0.00035467726,0.11060054,0.83776325,0.000052056002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.927012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95992565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07298797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060510986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0776518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980427265","doi":"","title":"Canada and the Rule of Law: 150 Years After Confederation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.016663194888243364,"score_gpt":0.27186265242218255,"score_spread":0.2551994575339392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980427265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31227165,0.043926843,0.0006521887,0.20391534,0.0024156417,0.00011159197,0.0013228662,0.000040049974,0.43534377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8693704,0.0076361056,0.00025275623,0.024440993,0.00028966105,0.00003685856,0.00032063393,0.00007763165,0.09757484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99088717,0.0009304545,0.00015769122,0.00074005406,0.0022117924,0.005072872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98995334,0.0019407257,0.0004371112,0.00027104947,0.004444535,0.002953238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004041433,0.0002858832,0.00081354834,0.0021793894,0.040704925,0.01909164,0.0024052467,0.007911261,0.0119039565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017534684,0.0004785951,0.00049690815,0.005034943,0.01759391,0.0058348607,0.0051287897,0.012764985,0.00066142034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021880443,0.00017363788,0.021056142,0.00013172411,0.000051996813,0.0012547119,0.1448589,0.00031572703,0.00023742166,0.59315675,0.1634688,0.07507532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020517471,0.000029862029,0.03350964,0.00040856257,0.000038156795,0.0001974423,0.11704717,0.00018608157,0.00029232667,0.0109834,0.8371772,0.00010960098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99508286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17111576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17111576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24322693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96138823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981578641","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvqc6jwv.7","title":"THE EVOLUTION OF INDIGENOUS SELF-GOVERNANCE IN CANADA","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Arizona Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Corporate governance; Geography; Political science; Business; Ecology; Biology; Finance","score_opus":0.01415824223552784,"score_gpt":0.19488761342538904,"score_spread":0.1807293711898612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981578641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56826615,0.0051150727,0.0010306119,0.0134447375,0.00011607926,0.00006571188,0.0005647907,0.000082305305,0.4113145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93663764,0.0013216763,0.0005034732,0.00033066134,0.000007989492,0.000010785725,0.00007479641,0.000028672954,0.061084248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842995,0.00014256935,0.000028194574,0.00015074128,0.000411633,0.000836929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793684,0.0002806234,0.00010516836,0.000088712455,0.0009878762,0.00060086703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009821375,0.0002526946,0.00039380806,0.0023324757,0.015786309,0.007692305,0.0014293323,0.0012758133,0.010589387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034927058,0.00031866814,0.0002889258,0.004694057,0.0075964094,0.0015161529,0.0024965557,0.0016939064,0.0003425159],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013136328,0.0000791394,0.033928856,0.00012474478,0.00005316777,0.0009963877,0.09610586,0.0033011814,0.00084045564,0.73505443,0.026756486,0.10262798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044632816,0.000051260915,0.16585514,0.00037173447,0.000062059444,0.0003106709,0.115153566,0.0038600727,0.00086229196,0.040274594,0.67299145,0.00016252232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99805284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8063562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1936438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17696339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9352589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981644837","doi":"","title":"The Metaphysics of Love: An Annotated Bibliography","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Bibliography; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.025063646991468316,"score_gpt":0.3102532083873004,"score_spread":0.2851895613958321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981644837","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012502213,0.5553258,0.005149646,0.012284322,0.0032380065,0.00003877663,0.0007819836,0.00008846929,0.4218428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.086236976,0.7735427,0.0065002725,0.0068872645,0.0074048424,0.0002802958,0.0021147307,0.00037977326,0.11665307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991647,0.00034242065,0.0000811228,0.00008430234,0.00026163823,0.0000657738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998539,0.0010126914,0.00007286873,0.000102980164,0.00021626438,0.000056204513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008934073,0.0006766949,0.0007325934,0.008502133,0.0032201936,0.0046688947,0.0009216457,0.0016595861,0.019394185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030180928,0.00035543507,0.0003720763,0.01603609,0.0058641457,0.006123274,0.0018951956,0.0031311319,0.0034847555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030244344,0.000022898925,0.0002112734,0.0021873335,0.000015538759,0.00013619647,0.0065347073,0.00044761185,0.0001752046,0.5498472,0.3480549,0.09233693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049946266,0.0000051741613,0.0008754699,0.0028250113,0.000006331364,0.0001760843,0.0015341636,0.00010553442,0.00005360346,0.08449854,0.90990084,0.0000142431945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008832014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012300322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019394185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004308154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027229837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06488001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981694973","doi":"10.7202/1059557ar","title":"Le projet de réforme du droit des successions","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.01971500355525772,"score_gpt":0.271865595544379,"score_spread":0.25215059198912126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981694973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52807444,0.0020876396,0.0042184307,0.021332782,0.000370226,0.0006044231,0.0006560782,0.00014939727,0.44250658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83408856,0.00080490747,0.0026803357,0.0012117393,0.000061112776,0.00016969896,0.00029797587,0.000045640285,0.16063988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665064,0.0008923643,0.00008471831,0.000197533,0.0011502428,0.00102453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992615,0.0010058678,0.0005262954,0.0005621336,0.0028778538,0.002412855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004310675,0.00021814553,0.00028597697,0.0013884373,0.005532045,0.004175642,0.0009980877,0.0010494521,0.012903165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010715734,0.00026416025,0.00023365501,0.0015266939,0.0040094894,0.001404096,0.002638026,0.002337651,0.0008709532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003251304,0.00059213553,0.070321865,0.0006683612,0.000045721874,0.0011503301,0.089069165,0.0035810932,0.0046376437,0.49268273,0.0726395,0.2642864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076221644,0.00040215987,0.23193589,0.00073314813,0.000022782167,0.00032542067,0.05090912,0.0013208863,0.00222331,0.0063222605,0.70565146,0.00007730288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6859658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7909529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6859658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036990426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07005782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6317673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981708187","doi":"10.4337/9781788113205.00035","title":"Conflicts in indigenous law: courts and federalism in the United States and common law nations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Federalist; Political science; Sovereignty; Supreme court; Federalism; Law; Indigenous rights; Politics; Devolution (biology); Sovereign state; Public administration; Geography","score_opus":0.03507061778984882,"score_gpt":0.28436656985617953,"score_spread":0.2492959520663307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981708187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080787964,0.04684919,0.0012975426,0.015574327,0.0003560064,0.000013574702,0.000021789241,0.000019717669,0.8550799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94606626,0.009489671,0.00050994573,0.0018762762,0.00022608838,0.000020437765,0.000023062485,0.000011474501,0.04177676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998555,0.00058897404,0.00004533925,0.00011718393,0.00037197923,0.0003214668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991517,0.0005320513,0.00009065956,0.000052655952,0.0001022128,0.00007070371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010646502,0.00014507471,0.00018617818,0.0013491907,0.008053012,0.0056767105,0.0006328072,0.0018860805,0.0027281865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025429707,0.00016742702,0.00016663736,0.002132976,0.01524719,0.004434409,0.002575685,0.002534353,0.0001263703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017814131,0.000005249929,0.0002236868,0.0000123643495,0.0000011812594,0.00006521258,0.012345046,0.00009311927,0.000027428658,0.9794846,0.0024288385,0.00531147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060337843,0.00001911584,0.007408144,0.0004336187,0.000011174229,0.00029748154,0.024252811,0.00061299367,0.00020835047,0.4629305,0.50379586,0.000023801984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.121921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20480734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013215023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006370089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2424227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981914853","doi":"10.3390/rel10110597","title":"The Discarded Image and the Debunked Tao: Objective Value in C.S. Lewis’ Medieval Model and His Critique of Modernity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religions","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences; Xiamen University; National Research University Higher School of Economics; University of Toronto","keywords":"Subjectivism; Explication; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Doctrine; Pluralism (philosophy); Modernity; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Theology","score_opus":0.015271246662041747,"score_gpt":0.3021522263668252,"score_spread":0.28688097970478343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981914853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095903404,0.020759925,0.020799192,0.10360146,0.0010418814,0.000032377455,0.00008037238,0.00006561736,0.75771576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9599583,0.002433115,0.0018077807,0.0037902126,0.0006434804,0.00003508728,0.000014962565,0.000042077558,0.031274952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984706,0.0009117902,0.000027657461,0.00013385013,0.0002966085,0.00015954005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991736,0.00044348644,0.000077290584,0.00007833027,0.00013530036,0.00009193289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021488788,0.0004025349,0.00025810287,0.0013057733,0.0039856285,0.0059533236,0.0008209438,0.0021562849,0.0019104906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019857904,0.00018497196,0.000291164,0.00094374106,0.041573677,0.0057576722,0.002385755,0.0042253714,0.00032082637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004486875,0.0000027415476,0.00003477724,0.0000054204324,7.445177e-7,0.00002025946,0.0032908882,0.000046181587,0.000021377999,0.99487656,0.0008585818,0.0008379837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011180675,0.00001510201,0.00015133418,0.000053960328,0.0000025800002,0.00005934917,0.0023139936,0.00034577717,0.00010930495,0.9352757,0.061650224,0.000011704046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073757297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00862806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007876371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007876371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027256731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982150316","doi":"","title":"Remedying the Remedy: Bedford's Suspended Declaration of Invalidity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Jurisdiction; Remedial education; Constitution; Redress","score_opus":0.0561625888549037,"score_gpt":0.33088056414203537,"score_spread":0.27471797528713165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982150316","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07723056,0.015919598,0.0108211925,0.56014127,0.006130126,0.00020021641,0.00023887154,0.00038495456,0.32893327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59024644,0.0033151447,0.0056235073,0.25147042,0.00072533195,0.00009787435,0.00010187868,0.00011676417,0.14830267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98288417,0.0033097556,0.00047399342,0.0015449227,0.0071043842,0.0046827695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924114,0.0031184303,0.00040939404,0.00046868058,0.0027672537,0.00082477205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007737464,0.00030122313,0.00040097922,0.0008214172,0.024917437,0.009148021,0.0031814051,0.0134257665,0.0026724734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019305414,0.00050958525,0.0006081568,0.00095829635,0.020232713,0.0028367375,0.0032451276,0.016401932,0.00049010536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026359827,0.00003038781,0.0019116479,0.00006957783,0.000012134282,0.0006951515,0.0136324,0.0003781678,0.0006672089,0.7860081,0.17637819,0.020190725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049692855,0.00006772222,0.0050061285,0.0005149893,0.0000605918,0.0003702813,0.011128633,0.0008373251,0.0021984885,0.042654548,0.93687624,0.00023539452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9068074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9579131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9068074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05819728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13898015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42225277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2987467374","doi":"10.14324/111.444.ljcs.2019v34.009","title":"Wisdom of the Elders: Canadian Reconciliatory Experience as an Insight on the Present","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Dignity; Deference; Enthusiasm; Harm; Environmental ethics; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Law; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.06257401903777396,"score_gpt":0.3176170666927969,"score_spread":0.25504304765502295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2987467374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68596494,0.00470487,0.0010025313,0.110631846,0.0021869414,0.000117008814,0.00022414446,0.00009706284,0.19507058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97209364,0.001099476,0.00034977664,0.0068755466,0.00013863643,0.00002564367,0.00003312988,0.00004836024,0.019335901],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897165,0.003522097,0.00021952497,0.00063893513,0.002056995,0.003845955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98976874,0.0029041562,0.00061163836,0.00036425944,0.0027540636,0.0035969983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008490368,0.0007054802,0.0010358118,0.0022633462,0.08625795,0.011289521,0.0035964244,0.0061926586,0.008966477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01702482,0.0005353596,0.00049677334,0.0032729604,0.031653922,0.0057768356,0.012732301,0.011646719,0.0005319503],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015182223,0.000015182164,0.0006064365,0.00002481274,0.0000027164783,0.0006857564,0.9762626,0.000025873906,0.0001198558,0.011280492,0.008009246,0.0029517638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035528303,0.000009706253,0.00068922335,0.00006356772,0.0000036550318,0.00019551351,0.9091236,0.00004097791,0.00004154668,0.0007768177,0.089024596,0.000027194666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93208456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9666563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08625795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06517053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08792759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47284746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989837601","doi":"10.4000/rdr.287","title":"Le principe d’accommodement raisonnable en matière religieuse","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du droit des religions","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019315842153738504,"score_gpt":0.2703594865863785,"score_spread":0.25104364443264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989837601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28311068,0.005559964,0.029216917,0.047351107,0.0005224527,0.00021196267,0.00035614253,0.00016216797,0.6335087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94551307,0.0010300531,0.004735377,0.003275939,0.00009913389,0.00006133676,0.000037747883,0.000037251335,0.045210056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949262,0.001057891,0.0001602525,0.0005038113,0.002102705,0.0012490562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99638474,0.00090254773,0.00042533755,0.00035664043,0.001373032,0.0005575925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037709966,0.00024433713,0.00032381198,0.0007418356,0.009943885,0.0048206155,0.0011382257,0.0021913731,0.00437286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065124026,0.00030248275,0.00035550082,0.00078138773,0.018013444,0.0012571287,0.00248896,0.0043074912,0.00035304326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021588254,0.000012463049,0.0039275936,0.000057893896,0.000017014607,0.00015889962,0.017405726,0.00038349192,0.0008242377,0.96200925,0.0033131852,0.011868588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009007731,0.00015203586,0.066829465,0.0009856571,0.00010443184,0.0005060953,0.02210443,0.0013331743,0.0026657486,0.20029329,0.7046866,0.00024895184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74585474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87359613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74585474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022743348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053689115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51128393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990684935","doi":"10.4000/rdr.295","title":"Convictions religieuses et ajustements de la norme commune : raideur théorique et souplesse jurisprudentielle","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du droit des religions","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.018147839460463805,"score_gpt":0.3188749625724672,"score_spread":0.30072712311200345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990684935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5602977,0.005668482,0.014145102,0.07612384,0.00028453936,0.0000535966,0.000109982946,0.000022897319,0.34329385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99607545,0.00045051012,0.00038860244,0.000615087,0.00003223142,0.000013411873,0.000009174975,0.000005993906,0.0024094507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935382,0.0044724457,0.00014867085,0.00048599823,0.00082359614,0.00053104083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98992366,0.0057787145,0.0016799395,0.00083402655,0.0012116259,0.0005721214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074361996,0.0002508656,0.00034748457,0.0013820075,0.0056056967,0.0070123705,0.0011996912,0.0021684181,0.0032636733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010022844,0.0002421834,0.00030961534,0.0012663044,0.05237803,0.0040789535,0.0034739214,0.0032190366,0.00017751513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009381755,0.000014732375,0.0017138199,0.000027423353,0.000009358432,0.00008544048,0.034544695,0.000086053784,0.00006235579,0.96080005,0.00042806577,0.002218564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007010339,0.0000644677,0.023318114,0.00064303627,0.000049715116,0.00027499252,0.13951814,0.0012756566,0.0005283843,0.75397563,0.080206454,0.000075223594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04048841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03659924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04048841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008334707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006572514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08050549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990774536","doi":"10.22215/cjcr.v5i1.1226","title":"Is the right to early intervention being honoured? A study of family experiences with early childhood services","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Children s Rights / Revue canadienne des droits des enfants","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Intervention (counseling); Legislation; Political science; Dignity; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Early childhood; Economic growth; Medicine; Convention; Public relations; Public administration; Nursing; Psychology; Human rights; Law; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.011549029101538693,"score_gpt":0.2517914789950956,"score_spread":0.2402424498935569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990774536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98509926,0.0016505078,0.00010167727,0.0031567754,0.00003444525,0.000032450316,0.00006584956,0.000002822742,0.009856187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945872,0.0015474773,0.0000662275,0.00048027182,0.0000080892,0.000019900182,0.000028465789,0.000004913953,0.0032573922],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99504095,0.0018102437,0.00012712427,0.0002965667,0.000826486,0.0018985942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916271,0.0036480785,0.0013363003,0.00024067033,0.0012227413,0.0019250589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037104294,0.0003695121,0.0006543145,0.0014708526,0.025740912,0.006209267,0.0019337256,0.0016195764,0.0034814582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011463225,0.00050423306,0.00029123315,0.0031955664,0.014854149,0.0036052966,0.0044647013,0.0028611177,0.0002052604],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016437962,0.00003853037,0.016399404,0.000026946083,0.0000033112385,0.0003834061,0.97809416,0.00001767619,0.00006505625,0.0013101825,0.0006499967,0.0029948961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015640239,0.000012064035,0.013569595,0.0000693393,0.0000024110795,0.0000965882,0.9816027,0.000013191539,0.000021891925,0.00008044696,0.00452292,0.0000071691406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93080735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9634881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06919265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050356325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050142005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36536247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990967075","doi":"10.71781/2017","title":"Des règles de dévolution légale en droit québécois : perspectives socio-historiques des affections présumées, pour une reconnaissance de la vocation successorale ab intestat du conjoint de fait survivant","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.041591692432917625,"score_gpt":0.360764709478406,"score_spread":0.3191730170454884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990967075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5729408,0.014394219,0.00366343,0.08370308,0.00036612208,0.00006450414,0.0004847793,0.000044773995,0.32433817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9606127,0.002397546,0.00038951696,0.0012201305,0.000026980677,0.000024965522,0.00005293847,0.000017876422,0.035257246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982135,0.0005482454,0.00003522587,0.00021988263,0.00037014697,0.0006128862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970356,0.00079278275,0.00029511531,0.00017875545,0.00085769483,0.00084006414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026096674,0.00031356592,0.00029305526,0.0018945074,0.018710736,0.00782214,0.0016741842,0.0018783924,0.010169139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004342524,0.00025770918,0.00026639632,0.0020453862,0.023392662,0.004521449,0.0035506934,0.0042077266,0.0003037155],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028239414,0.000022083166,0.009705144,0.00008599948,0.000014690736,0.0006703631,0.41903096,0.000420045,0.00028982025,0.5295578,0.0144729,0.025701966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009952691,0.000024296638,0.047311172,0.0007548162,0.000021128944,0.0003032052,0.49240068,0.0005466059,0.00038170288,0.022740986,0.43542182,0.000083679755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9675162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98265195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08275248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08275248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06340518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6004141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991077786","doi":"10.21991/cf29391","title":"Shouting into the Constitutional Void: Section 28 and Bill 21","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Law; Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Bill of rights; Constitutional law; Blocking (statistics); Sociology; Public administration; Constitution; Business; Philosophy; Computer science; Advertising; Linguistics","score_opus":0.020440381728357857,"score_gpt":0.28113438042424244,"score_spread":0.26069399869588455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991077786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01765454,0.003719073,0.0073064906,0.19179864,0.0058492995,0.00046047766,0.00056600897,0.00029475096,0.7723507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33376545,0.0018100241,0.008642458,0.28231117,0.0021510758,0.0007989133,0.00058940623,0.000485022,0.36944643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9643732,0.0058520357,0.0011784764,0.0028656183,0.015147263,0.010583347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98446184,0.0063135615,0.0006435421,0.0015093164,0.004937247,0.002134496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025344206,0.00069745927,0.00091475574,0.0014092657,0.018677672,0.0131425485,0.0039055564,0.020868946,0.009705625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04748239,0.000830659,0.00085031084,0.0014927542,0.02432745,0.004362357,0.0051802956,0.019878043,0.001922705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012861382,0.000013609431,0.00028483398,0.000015828191,0.0000024978624,0.000108496446,0.0029821862,0.00007846123,0.00019080476,0.9286286,0.06423803,0.0034437233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003615432,0.0000327285,0.0026267623,0.00028858476,0.000018228458,0.00012778935,0.0028970586,0.00025556565,0.0006382537,0.10145926,0.8914893,0.00013029335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7023361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8048353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29766393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03738941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1289709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5988338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W299398132","doi":"10.18584/iipj.2015.6.1.6","title":"No Jordan’s Principle Cases in Canada? A Review of the Administrative Response to Jordan’s Principle","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Indigenous Policy Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Royal Bank of Canada; McGill University; UNICEF","keywords":"Indigenous; Legislature; Denial; Administrative law; Political science; Public administration; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.1281705486883464,"score_gpt":0.46580442545543305,"score_spread":0.33763387676708667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W299398132","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014828934,0.9875502,0.000062277046,0.0039334097,0.0002976523,0.000018551638,0.00004986727,0.0000044577423,0.006600553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019286558,0.97719073,0.00021967254,0.0020818578,0.0001492673,0.000017444601,0.000055067554,0.0000052397572,0.0009940573],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962196,0.000664495,0.00032078745,0.0002905614,0.0021196166,0.0003849721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923051,0.002867136,0.0007394847,0.00012235125,0.003528372,0.00043753075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060225395,0.0005915722,0.0010625958,0.006299333,0.004720286,0.005654064,0.0024048164,0.0023517522,0.002672325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0120273465,0.00042250185,0.00059595297,0.015208155,0.005757729,0.0021813803,0.0012153034,0.0024093117,0.00022321835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007318588,0.00011206728,0.0031293186,0.055941325,0.00021192268,0.0011169901,0.016810898,0.0009014917,0.0004466748,0.12578838,0.13992512,0.65554255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008089501,0.000024435281,0.008188308,0.03328843,0.00012841911,0.00032891604,0.006548685,0.00012048717,0.00024315272,0.0024397234,0.9486298,0.00005158603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88949627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93391544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11050373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055470813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2108327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40247077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994068231","doi":"","title":"Comment in Response to the Draft Model Conscientious Objection Policy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.06597081633385625,"score_gpt":0.42193387586080455,"score_spread":0.3559630595269483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994068231","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008572653,0.00035225524,0.00025068392,0.9725566,0.0095271785,0.000080060825,0.00050279347,0.00014389842,0.015729314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005027641,0.00021055811,0.00020642864,0.96223736,0.002295491,0.0001329002,0.00013334073,0.00007966765,0.029676624],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97214925,0.0048526567,0.0019087079,0.0036723667,0.010738904,0.0066781896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9131867,0.04836309,0.0030017144,0.0036239382,0.02598212,0.005842452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028626582,0.0011804489,0.0017522732,0.0015275925,0.012852538,0.014508412,0.0097848885,0.10212449,0.042482346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12791969,0.001777904,0.0034202344,0.002686582,0.010134903,0.008880202,0.005875626,0.06305351,0.02147842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022566233,0.000011729492,0.0002497942,0.00004337151,0.0000046496166,0.000097816875,0.0008627672,0.0000581336,0.000048177262,0.010916728,0.98650485,0.0011794592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070178765,0.000022888726,0.0022978168,0.00042100297,0.000031544867,0.000073210955,0.0022959483,0.0003652677,0.00033115613,0.0052027944,0.98876816,0.00011994551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.433493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3831508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.433493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04980194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.075071394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86193955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W299413661","doi":"","title":"Due Process, Collective Bargaining, and S. 2(D) of the Charter: A Comment on B.C. Health Services","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Collective bargaining; Supreme court; Entitlement (fair division); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Freedom of association; Context (archaeology); Labour law; Sociology; Economics; Human rights","score_opus":0.009008304120913378,"score_gpt":0.28356077667657653,"score_spread":0.2745524725556632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W299413661","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004942276,0.010059499,0.002389655,0.90934724,0.013639368,0.00015539351,0.0004975813,0.00010977766,0.05885917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03517957,0.0021370153,0.0014339342,0.92726946,0.006136491,0.00033046553,0.000090281035,0.00008946798,0.02733335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96044225,0.009585973,0.0022626314,0.006519711,0.012062818,0.009126602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97603637,0.017675847,0.0009861349,0.0007498692,0.0031357328,0.0014161185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031873796,0.0023125338,0.003267561,0.001608667,0.033231236,0.018479291,0.011561621,0.1255223,0.00448579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044503193,0.0022833094,0.006046424,0.0029119859,0.03659393,0.007363842,0.006371511,0.09924381,0.0015479494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006881141,0.000050509225,0.00040633866,0.00012175561,0.000027522896,0.00052704604,0.0049358997,0.0003688818,0.00031651134,0.69113034,0.29881167,0.0032347366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046481862,0.00020463714,0.0035239854,0.0017126374,0.00016139897,0.00034214303,0.0056653344,0.00232487,0.0010269828,0.19813496,0.7858079,0.00063035806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7172118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7552475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28278822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054881226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0714124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5689072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995287528","doi":"10.1177/1473779519891623","title":"Constitutional promises of indigenous recognition: Canada, Vanuatu and the challenges of pluralism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Indigenous; Commit; Colonialism; Indigenous rights; Political science; Law; Legal pluralism; Sociology; Law and economics; Human rights; Political economy; Epistemology; Comparative law; Legal realism","score_opus":0.04928625957437298,"score_gpt":0.3044637041453054,"score_spread":0.2551774445709324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995287528","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19127285,0.33219662,0.0012067135,0.16153102,0.0014466414,0.000060938986,0.00031839966,0.00003422562,0.31193256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91353637,0.059374314,0.000787335,0.009696413,0.00024701233,0.000031904267,0.00009607884,0.000014878491,0.01621572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542916,0.00083208294,0.0001237189,0.0003415158,0.0014557791,0.0018176945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99477106,0.0020959831,0.00035270178,0.0002206802,0.0017465559,0.00081304036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004943232,0.00022334034,0.00043485453,0.0024072898,0.0115096355,0.011134943,0.0020602725,0.0026937758,0.0015696648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008096935,0.00018111979,0.00024976942,0.004361005,0.013540109,0.0029705241,0.0035199448,0.0028246683,0.00007124855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004985974,0.00002419942,0.003196547,0.0005649677,0.00003705816,0.0004943834,0.019374754,0.00066843606,0.0003231948,0.8888207,0.021431018,0.06501492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003471876,0.000039932016,0.025913533,0.0034578126,0.00016560897,0.0003820114,0.06095477,0.00091504684,0.0008838566,0.1324312,0.77467185,0.00014964149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9743785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9856038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06960368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06960368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17409982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5050124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995523289","doi":"","title":"ACPNS Legal Case Notes Series: 2016-31 Royal Trust Corporation Of Canada v The University Of Western Ontario","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; University of Windsor","keywords":"Corporation; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; High Court; Public administration","score_opus":0.012593391581687697,"score_gpt":0.20361023829681918,"score_spread":0.19101684671513147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995523289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041512422,0.0087124705,0.0008166169,0.087560825,0.0029327557,0.00055706233,0.006287473,0.00018581931,0.8514345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16777399,0.0029694964,0.00057641574,0.032542296,0.0004128212,0.00022325214,0.0012506554,0.00009226065,0.7941588],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99545896,0.000202624,0.0001638916,0.00028443622,0.002353787,0.0015363402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99670804,0.0005453241,0.00017143141,0.0001617204,0.001615309,0.0007980749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020591717,0.00060769357,0.00035035392,0.0013921367,0.02206356,0.005049442,0.002103521,0.011199718,0.024731716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009175793,0.0008904197,0.0005844168,0.0021717718,0.0035760403,0.0017416817,0.0021662526,0.0058618276,0.0032437625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009828341,0.00007110015,0.005755055,0.00014322724,0.0000195509,0.0018921943,0.0071180477,0.00021737129,0.0005044687,0.09775559,0.87531376,0.011111359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004928765,0.000031853346,0.02016062,0.0003085391,0.000048985217,0.00043047115,0.0049267253,0.00024275552,0.00071235053,0.0033531028,0.96964395,0.00009132114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9851247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0761083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0761083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13126339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55220693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996104773","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3401591","title":"The Canada Summer Jobs Debate and the Democratic Decline","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Political economy; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.008984840848250908,"score_gpt":0.2605664697138919,"score_spread":0.251581628865641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996104773","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056543678,0.0044938684,0.00031870537,0.6360288,0.001908359,0.000049439386,0.0003913752,0.00004118747,0.30022454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6523126,0.00190916,0.0002950873,0.14735109,0.00081981666,0.00007817164,0.00012409921,0.00013149719,0.19697846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818932,0.00237524,0.00020430614,0.0010853749,0.0037094636,0.010732553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98247313,0.0046876012,0.0006582645,0.00058492925,0.003891666,0.0077044615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010107987,0.0006141125,0.0011529202,0.0021648193,0.07472328,0.027720783,0.003473738,0.02246612,0.030362314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023498258,0.00066857587,0.0008512431,0.004386514,0.03008422,0.006987839,0.010277692,0.023867441,0.0017221638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011458932,0.0000781353,0.002768827,0.000057517012,0.0000168157,0.00032265412,0.022389492,0.00030024952,0.00015508872,0.7238337,0.23892678,0.01103606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013266392,0.00002723864,0.011627103,0.00027253962,0.00002488185,0.00008055595,0.057325877,0.00043441198,0.00030594127,0.063163854,0.8664535,0.00015144513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98658586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9935308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18179823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18179823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31961378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9489981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996669099","doi":"","title":"Effects of Mandatory Minimum Sentences on the Rights of the Indigenous Population in Canada: A Proposed Solution to Bill C-10's Conflict With Section 718.2(e) of the Canadian Criminal Code","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Section (typography); Law; Population; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Demography","score_opus":0.022457540751058765,"score_gpt":0.24590952895194107,"score_spread":0.2234519882008823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996669099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63936955,0.0019375219,0.0029941406,0.11191079,0.00077417697,0.0010231042,0.00038344113,0.00009002042,0.24151728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96677196,0.0006652923,0.0024717408,0.016840985,0.0001927888,0.00019743765,0.00007900304,0.000013600778,0.012767109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98278266,0.0035616094,0.00034881395,0.0008688154,0.004470221,0.0079679405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818347,0.007187552,0.0015616942,0.00060179306,0.0059337243,0.002880456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009415208,0.0006664917,0.0007222969,0.0018464423,0.020289745,0.008724637,0.006454429,0.0065036654,0.0062892823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0361154,0.000553147,0.0012263854,0.0016945798,0.009013577,0.0025977436,0.0054441476,0.0059625097,0.00023827166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085219595,0.0018439919,0.08294009,0.0006108172,0.0003914406,0.0033341236,0.047079366,0.010220902,0.0050090495,0.6636097,0.064165115,0.11994324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015782005,0.003308217,0.49457505,0.0028534597,0.0024023796,0.0006637078,0.18306313,0.025233032,0.0061913943,0.10026385,0.178988,0.0008795785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96864665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9865758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06758472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06758472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19845738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49036378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998635348","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x19001868","title":"General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Synod; Session (web analytics); Theology; Political science; Law; Advertising; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.014206956771013272,"score_gpt":0.2652995725323078,"score_spread":0.25109261576129455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998635348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03853327,0.018448303,0.00075262197,0.0442043,0.0083205905,0.00022331087,0.0045172432,0.00025382332,0.8847465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09341771,0.0033326142,0.0003673384,0.0036537293,0.00034099518,0.000030326322,0.00062133453,0.00011551587,0.8981205],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995178,0.0000476522,0.000010511324,0.00007664459,0.00017212763,0.0001751956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879116,0.000042706004,0.000030903473,0.00004128603,0.00056841027,0.00052553066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005115362,0.0002840515,0.0002671981,0.00075507996,0.013990939,0.002392895,0.0005463413,0.0009581512,0.0924645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010586578,0.00026408446,0.00010583985,0.00097524864,0.0010415855,0.0007379885,0.0015727924,0.0016600325,0.0068059615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039137616,0.000016596236,0.0023176898,0.00011055091,0.0000033702893,0.00028045944,0.003444968,0.000034496952,0.0007070004,0.014474977,0.9406553,0.03791532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015647045,0.0000029558078,0.0031958488,0.000040778927,6.4805334e-7,0.00004943591,0.002343447,0.0000113994,0.000056988083,0.00013061732,0.9941612,0.000005067796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8560366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96567744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9825779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017422058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025366016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30932456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30005539","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1301","title":"\"The Last Line of Defence for [Which?] Citizens\": Accountability, Equality, and the Right to Health in Chaoulli","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Right to health; Accountability; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Political science; Health care; Remedial education; Poverty; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.03683498682653357,"score_gpt":0.3514663636709567,"score_spread":0.3146313768444231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30005539","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06634442,0.0067178584,0.0035111606,0.66609865,0.0008533939,0.000058507925,0.00006479024,0.000032621883,0.25631863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8195294,0.0013558184,0.0011729087,0.14211565,0.00031453746,0.00005820373,0.000019330886,0.000026171105,0.035407905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905128,0.0025978484,0.00015455401,0.00082814234,0.0023531707,0.003553558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938735,0.0033984599,0.00039790964,0.0002003435,0.0011887207,0.00094124104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008506657,0.00027665624,0.0004349704,0.00089655485,0.036431883,0.015606076,0.0015855446,0.012903019,0.0019323861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01470335,0.0003296872,0.00031488104,0.0008793335,0.05546473,0.0062443116,0.005943359,0.015214791,0.00018959715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009444617,0.0000075442244,0.00072225835,0.000012060211,0.0000022706718,0.00014140167,0.02094636,0.00005681825,0.000077629054,0.9621043,0.01267027,0.0032495814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004513507,0.000037391073,0.0048703435,0.0004396828,0.00003160024,0.00041999822,0.062117666,0.00061503967,0.0013189862,0.45562595,0.4743035,0.00017462348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7578809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8013506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24211907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032231756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06305314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48708987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001868410","doi":"10.5325/weslmethstud.12.1.0047","title":"Whose Body, Whose Life, Whose Decision? A Wesleyan Reflection on Personal Autonomy, Interdependence, and Human Flourishing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wesley and Methodist Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Voluntariness; Flourishing; Autonomy; Image of God; Social psychology; Creatures; Independence (probability theory); Personal identity; Psychology; Interdependence; Rationality; Welfare; Ambivalence; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Law; Self; Political science; Social science; Natural (archaeology); Philosophy","score_opus":0.1361839188947937,"score_gpt":0.4332444359885134,"score_spread":0.2970605170937197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001868410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26908264,0.024554342,0.014197524,0.30671704,0.0018419072,0.00005011757,0.000047021513,0.000033877528,0.38347554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98415715,0.0019703002,0.0011665978,0.0044993153,0.00010914391,0.00001570094,0.000003857947,0.000009496955,0.008068482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99594265,0.0033715267,0.00005621995,0.00018959168,0.0002187667,0.00022114796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99680114,0.0022218074,0.00023413623,0.00022352858,0.0002235968,0.00029581564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008061904,0.0003435293,0.0002814042,0.00087519037,0.0055557126,0.005739314,0.00069386093,0.0018418281,0.0016048898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00445228,0.00020784981,0.00020146658,0.00040906257,0.07248037,0.0073098224,0.0048325527,0.003916594,0.00013535212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001725831,0.000027304075,0.000588237,0.000041455132,0.000003972225,0.00027164278,0.2552992,0.00008115748,0.00025961167,0.73259294,0.0041724546,0.006644706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001702196,0.00003555132,0.0017581584,0.00044265392,0.000010000778,0.0005526685,0.24730058,0.00034332892,0.0005670073,0.56304604,0.18589695,0.000030011935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060678865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009331173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008061904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003623615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024782643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042635918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002103364","doi":"","title":"Inclusive Religious Neutrality: Rearticulating the Relationship Between Sections 2(a) and 15 of the Charter","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Charter; Law; Vision; Political science; Constitutional law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02244835138174887,"score_gpt":0.3104388795895534,"score_spread":0.2879905282078045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002103364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12988694,0.003962164,0.028920738,0.039602872,0.0006873409,0.00027664306,0.000198033,0.00008795299,0.79637736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.964576,0.00070356287,0.0047835903,0.008371385,0.000108083215,0.00008411671,0.000051616928,0.00002611865,0.021295436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871144,0.0027421317,0.00028868497,0.0010664082,0.0055927057,0.003195709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99346006,0.0022492723,0.00055165536,0.00053643633,0.0023073896,0.00089520775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010199735,0.00038405295,0.0004253148,0.0018245608,0.014908787,0.010168156,0.0020231034,0.003650086,0.0026391742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0131262,0.00028477114,0.000514976,0.0014048411,0.039519317,0.0037518903,0.004712334,0.005564268,0.000226451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007835854,0.0000052989462,0.0008055024,0.000013844229,0.0000033777944,0.00006184155,0.007854128,0.00011346373,0.00014510004,0.9836378,0.0020734107,0.005278416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048979593,0.00008953533,0.021015419,0.0006123976,0.00006254568,0.00031115796,0.027200697,0.0011928899,0.001136037,0.51220745,0.43591055,0.00021230568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8269033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8799064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8269033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039551392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10455619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3482322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003160002","doi":"","title":"Section 16 of the Constitution Act, 1867: The Queen, the Capital, and Canadian Constitutionalism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ePrints Soton (University of Southampton)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Section (typography); Constitution; Queen (butterfly); Capital (architecture); Political science; Law; History; Business; Ancient history; Democracy; Advertising; Biology; Politics","score_opus":0.01803091587759484,"score_gpt":0.2316604508470484,"score_spread":0.21362953496945356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003160002","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017013114,0.035334714,0.002236325,0.09062971,0.00232496,0.00010830484,0.0025141963,0.00006754643,0.8497712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5515729,0.038430188,0.006571939,0.038749248,0.0013678814,0.00021765441,0.0022408953,0.00022252057,0.36062676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934011,0.00075809244,0.00017497392,0.0005275218,0.0029885205,0.002149695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684745,0.00087817066,0.00016331612,0.00014973628,0.0015563765,0.00040497797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035596187,0.00054922915,0.00046595576,0.0022984203,0.01772718,0.012169327,0.0016411078,0.0047063394,0.00863781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007657203,0.0005259073,0.0004242682,0.004937596,0.024524432,0.00294538,0.0025289466,0.0048507056,0.0011000701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000083794675,0.0000034440136,0.0004578897,0.00005920729,0.0000030315937,0.000076741686,0.005465955,0.00013576033,0.000075099706,0.92966986,0.05842695,0.005617777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014294361,0.000006144288,0.005304475,0.00045959977,0.000018293369,0.00006330131,0.004866666,0.00021059648,0.00017301219,0.052142877,0.93668455,0.0000561886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.989005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99336064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1410069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1410069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24215738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99631023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003543051","doi":"10.1163/22124810-00703003","title":"Honest Scales","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law Religion and State","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Perspective (graphical); Proportionality (law); Value (mathematics); Law; Test (biology); Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01912068999241757,"score_gpt":0.308309223051352,"score_spread":0.28918853305893444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003543051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011889786,0.0008583511,0.05831699,0.0125219105,0.0032055385,0.0011928828,0.0016518963,0.00070533593,0.90965724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.324906,0.0014074595,0.086534694,0.012866657,0.0016587657,0.003037588,0.0023066422,0.0009531665,0.566329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810418,0.0060959794,0.0014380523,0.0023524011,0.008122509,0.00094937166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9639602,0.010000716,0.0026599916,0.007545104,0.0144547,0.0013793171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015486518,0.00074601086,0.00060750794,0.002146466,0.0035502533,0.005387822,0.001888289,0.0017403465,0.10666605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07906333,0.00037763215,0.0006540197,0.0018411322,0.004398166,0.0047845044,0.0046222224,0.00285229,0.035738483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023209763,0.00009886657,0.0044842917,0.00027018992,0.00003466028,0.00014320642,0.0060805054,0.00020323903,0.00081798,0.56433254,0.20019607,0.22310627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037055204,0.00011998287,0.0067823497,0.0003619477,0.000021387064,0.00029058722,0.0029255147,0.0005883973,0.00063293887,0.09913494,0.8890415,0.00006341319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029453714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006150488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10666605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020565328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029731633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35683352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007304736","doi":"10.3138/uram.36.3-4.144","title":"3.9 The Self—A Thinking Thing or a Thinking Being? Insight from Shankarite and Cartesian Philosophies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ultimate Reality and Meaning","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cartesian coordinate system; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.054294177265153405,"score_gpt":0.30473359319724075,"score_spread":0.25043941593208735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007304736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066201866,0.003402263,0.029935759,0.036781315,0.00032564322,0.00003693248,0.00008845516,0.000069931564,0.86315775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95687824,0.0011717728,0.011350325,0.0024244238,0.00015466449,0.00007232655,0.00003931771,0.000051748542,0.027857175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987055,0.0006168659,0.00004083836,0.0001845497,0.00028009276,0.00017215512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892056,0.0005677549,0.000099270095,0.00014215187,0.00017352452,0.0000967286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002335077,0.00038617235,0.00041572377,0.0011508053,0.0030924983,0.0049508554,0.0009430755,0.0022486215,0.005538058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002034335,0.00023226214,0.0006386738,0.00086004264,0.035081226,0.0068168845,0.0035420002,0.0045847064,0.00070047105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031869454,0.000002282787,0.00005331058,0.000010341196,6.801563e-7,0.000010802406,0.0021215852,0.000024415882,0.000023593882,0.99688715,0.00027113938,0.0005915511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009399954,0.000008886467,0.00024218421,0.000041700332,0.0000033027356,0.00006732163,0.002648753,0.0002542136,0.00007587473,0.9788704,0.017772071,0.000005929178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045301626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004010324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005538058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036275303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026490542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026319623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008518805","doi":"","title":"Quebec's Filiation Regime, The Roy Report 's Recommendations, and the 'Interest of the Child'","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Law; Common law; Family law; Conversation; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Sociology; Public law","score_opus":0.022015074757276834,"score_gpt":0.3137572009055432,"score_spread":0.2917421261482664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008518805","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079216205,0.023138665,0.00508748,0.49077564,0.0033004116,0.00031321406,0.0023601581,0.00042558167,0.39538276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59240836,0.007185093,0.008193076,0.081424884,0.0004575611,0.00024247007,0.0005911647,0.00015652357,0.30934092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947167,0.0009388619,0.00019738279,0.000419316,0.0019915535,0.0017361843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99198544,0.002220478,0.0005102469,0.00042162449,0.003616197,0.0012459435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004758672,0.000366931,0.00027700412,0.0010422177,0.011187913,0.006409388,0.0024329582,0.0062048133,0.009604248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011956038,0.00028280038,0.00043141306,0.001318869,0.0052175685,0.0016119911,0.0014414507,0.0061338376,0.00081215537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067464476,0.000068767535,0.011958955,0.00024324935,0.0000234166,0.001104546,0.011504317,0.0009790692,0.0010810897,0.51087725,0.4116481,0.05044371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027444363,0.000033679906,0.024234993,0.00040147614,0.0000225576,0.00018463789,0.006109451,0.0005635965,0.0006262957,0.0046193535,0.96303946,0.00013708122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9890148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9925476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067501575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.067501575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12709096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48976052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010405872","doi":"10.22584/nr50.2020.007","title":"Drawing upon the Wealth of Indigenous Laws in the Yukon","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Northern Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Normative; Law; Sociology; Reflection (computer programming); Political science; Ecology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06644432235987696,"score_gpt":0.3449583223387585,"score_spread":0.27851399997888154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010405872","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25620177,0.57513183,0.0027451962,0.02226377,0.0005824656,0.00004603788,0.00034872477,0.000042942153,0.14263736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7957858,0.19583225,0.0010403275,0.001539549,0.000044809283,0.000016211554,0.000120183766,0.000010986498,0.005609963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991942,0.00028448403,0.00006937087,0.00011744248,0.00016661565,0.00016785455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998898,0.00053781096,0.00009882682,0.000074263146,0.00033524728,0.000055775636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014477437,0.00024062797,0.00054539565,0.0017505869,0.0033439365,0.0039360207,0.00053086487,0.0006971522,0.0010830424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019336795,0.00013914349,0.00020671338,0.004895832,0.0041383067,0.0021962954,0.0019993857,0.0009325235,0.00008473602],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009071926,0.000034759916,0.025938822,0.015147318,0.00035472802,0.0041359775,0.26833478,0.0015451002,0.0046682158,0.38857162,0.011363603,0.2798144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008694297,0.000054745917,0.08082168,0.00902309,0.00043993923,0.0015302307,0.28208616,0.00031695885,0.0011208558,0.030398307,0.5941345,0.000064766835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58531815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8315003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41468185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011804257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02971114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.834248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010980273","doi":"","title":"Legal Pluralism and Caron v Alberta: A Canadian Case Study in Constitutional Interpretation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional interpretation; Pluralism (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law; Legal pluralism; Constitutional law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Comparative law; Legal realism; Linguistics","score_opus":0.022329250960339067,"score_gpt":0.29011812915191926,"score_spread":0.2677888781915802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010980273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5517377,0.005427677,0.0010003916,0.06344546,0.00024108056,0.00017509471,0.00028078532,0.00003283932,0.37765893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94481194,0.0021541645,0.0008783247,0.00730922,0.00004469568,0.000054367127,0.000062110885,0.0000318326,0.044653337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98972243,0.0016329663,0.0001474395,0.00071220665,0.0025624002,0.0052225674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914756,0.004524317,0.00047483784,0.00029642193,0.0018066892,0.0014222133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066156844,0.0005568272,0.00069800083,0.0029065127,0.07215599,0.011480621,0.0040741563,0.013128121,0.006575083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014771439,0.0008497459,0.0006848661,0.0070595792,0.025870083,0.0031142416,0.0063351654,0.012208235,0.00026422576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023951002,0.0002033967,0.02496969,0.0001968227,0.000057256555,0.011851671,0.24131788,0.0016055639,0.00068636175,0.63840026,0.049328286,0.031143354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015002691,0.00006435026,0.04466572,0.00072471,0.00018794382,0.0029784373,0.5003238,0.0019945318,0.0010085532,0.044436153,0.40316045,0.00030543059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99898785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20579515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20579515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29623225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92116505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011560603","doi":"10.11575/prism/34318","title":"The Evolution of Wildlife Law in Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada; University of Alberta; University of Calgary","keywords":"Wildlife; Law; Geography; Political science; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.029210523495498044,"score_gpt":0.3059546952686766,"score_spread":0.27674417177317856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011560603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52079195,0.0068613924,0.002049523,0.04624114,0.00038371902,0.00014495564,0.000782077,0.00011863927,0.42262658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96663105,0.0019953218,0.0009362593,0.0025335706,0.000029311306,0.000024124785,0.00015168262,0.00004122616,0.027657527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943439,0.00049709214,0.00010915086,0.0007218915,0.00230334,0.0020246604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98556906,0.0024174494,0.0007940261,0.00033078017,0.008186116,0.0027025351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031876916,0.00019593028,0.00038726325,0.006046711,0.021591492,0.009946312,0.001986647,0.0020479243,0.0059866887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015974369,0.0004916087,0.00032413413,0.00783152,0.014821465,0.0025617771,0.0030645658,0.0031774063,0.00020161168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082517545,0.000096206066,0.06800441,0.00012714822,0.000056263387,0.0009523784,0.06082289,0.0024336004,0.0010743269,0.71610093,0.038971722,0.111277595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040459316,0.0000710846,0.32920355,0.00046226592,0.0000960954,0.00032253147,0.05400393,0.0035705287,0.0008776709,0.028416526,0.58268756,0.00024783966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99776137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.313019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.313019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27356878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7968006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011637430","doi":"10.22215/etd/2020-13983","title":"An Exploration of the Colonial Impacts of the Indian Act on Indigenous Women in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Colonialism; Legislation; Paternalism; Political science; Identity (music); Indigenous rights; Gender studies; Geography; Human rights; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02606060509321293,"score_gpt":0.30777147618775474,"score_spread":0.2817108710945418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011637430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82804996,0.004560637,0.00017182266,0.020743096,0.00026538485,0.00009145916,0.00021657004,0.0000151505255,0.14588594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9661077,0.00600734,0.00021735016,0.0023987712,0.00002884645,0.000028053568,0.0000678959,0.000020843905,0.025123196],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688137,0.00054627785,0.00004241107,0.00015090934,0.0009309703,0.0014480327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966216,0.0007700555,0.0002632166,0.00006464317,0.0011869449,0.0010933762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019992238,0.00030811562,0.00044239598,0.0018113883,0.050983187,0.007341061,0.0012919182,0.0009863597,0.005224924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043222494,0.00034844328,0.00024347182,0.0045337486,0.013693631,0.0017639415,0.0050328746,0.0033427542,0.00025397568],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003076746,0.00004240422,0.015567503,0.0001437488,0.000010688297,0.0010640811,0.9234884,0.00009476719,0.00038427117,0.025241675,0.012923255,0.02100845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017776634,0.000010583895,0.015567487,0.00019637517,0.0000088701445,0.00009429941,0.9290716,0.000040883177,0.00010234572,0.00040778957,0.054479763,0.000018227487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9919098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99732685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1376503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1376503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2135216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012063507","doi":"","title":"Hugh M. Kindred: A Tribute","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03116147522242311,"score_gpt":0.30555701705494875,"score_spread":0.2743955418325256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012063507","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007258106,0.019688452,0.00020620503,0.81024456,0.122530475,0.000032579734,0.00010747905,0.00014789043,0.046316627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010074954,0.005703018,0.00041913165,0.4904408,0.015269467,0.000053995882,0.000060944076,0.00016488157,0.47781286],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745435,0.00037441257,0.00009106954,0.00041581917,0.0011550874,0.0005092765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99466515,0.00072326575,0.000117998796,0.00023146598,0.002190825,0.002071308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025012363,0.00067619694,0.0009342457,0.00090268697,0.011028763,0.006499234,0.0015947873,0.010676524,0.0348489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009386757,0.00060121616,0.00048607835,0.0008189205,0.0031136612,0.003994535,0.0032550446,0.010286068,0.013513289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022455931,0.0000046704395,0.000043693195,0.000006066213,7.251584e-7,0.000029434852,0.000046584006,0.0000030891663,0.000014782039,0.0010167541,0.99552345,0.003308465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026536852,0.000005565836,0.00030615504,0.000037960213,0.0000012874624,0.00005930367,0.0004076615,0.000015368809,0.000030838077,0.00041663393,0.9987061,0.00001046778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0869251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16159652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0869251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006056084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012023794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17283827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012515956","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0115","title":"In Search of Honourable Crowns and Legitimate Constitutions: <i>Mikisew Cree First Nation v Canada</i> and the Colonial Constitution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Indigenous; Duty; Doctrine; Political science; Legislation; Colonialism; Sociology","score_opus":0.0248928437648911,"score_gpt":0.23658758774391284,"score_spread":0.21169474397902174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012515956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16188653,0.014725299,0.0042903475,0.104942344,0.0007480886,0.0001926812,0.00019249477,0.000049864222,0.7129723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91821486,0.0024267214,0.0017862526,0.014242034,0.00012392772,0.00005424265,0.000049306513,0.00002815591,0.06307451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995262,0.0006994482,0.000087334905,0.00046273446,0.001455343,0.002033166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977774,0.00085654744,0.00018188202,0.00009201005,0.0007154091,0.00037674615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030664282,0.00034225543,0.00031969667,0.0012715952,0.020327639,0.015662575,0.002045031,0.007739854,0.003295804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067997277,0.0004275587,0.00034064378,0.0012168091,0.029052202,0.003151896,0.0034456637,0.00917139,0.00025727195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009421293,0.0000053706203,0.00051921804,0.000025064814,0.0000057346765,0.00032839997,0.0130645055,0.0001529175,0.00023589874,0.97614235,0.006710965,0.002800165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000684504,0.00003212103,0.010521233,0.00058581575,0.000079249745,0.00035006666,0.055201527,0.0012902432,0.0019300501,0.23537998,0.69433993,0.00022138518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9660207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.985252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07823352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07823352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0893198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5676266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013366349","doi":"","title":"ACPNS Legal Case Notes Series: 2019-97 Church of Atheism of Central Canada v Canada (National Revenue)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Atheism; Series (stratigraphy); Revenue; Political science; Law; History; Economics; Philosophy; Theology; Accounting; Geology","score_opus":0.009565104221219058,"score_gpt":0.21826524112167212,"score_spread":0.20870013690045305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013366349","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03387331,0.0040940694,0.0007295611,0.12221527,0.003684221,0.00064306706,0.00934759,0.00018202899,0.8252309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.146282,0.0018665933,0.0005986468,0.09034247,0.0004651893,0.0002717435,0.0022243422,0.00008377713,0.75786525],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99617803,0.00017185508,0.00008257108,0.00026631608,0.0016256094,0.0016756961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714357,0.0004394135,0.0000761271,0.00009728989,0.001500887,0.00074277824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019096868,0.0005449579,0.00035661997,0.0015537633,0.022443272,0.005503629,0.0026203478,0.01274157,0.032062378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006199579,0.0007886544,0.000646442,0.0018787832,0.0028286655,0.0012591011,0.0022002722,0.008870508,0.0044071875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006196807,0.000075752665,0.0029932803,0.000059991275,0.000015212005,0.0013311952,0.0018742825,0.000175215,0.00032851042,0.06372161,0.92117316,0.0081898635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073423646,0.000034211786,0.013764991,0.00031162624,0.000054814267,0.0005056655,0.005433462,0.00040565967,0.00085838273,0.003786752,0.9746889,0.000082069346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98117334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99463415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06478357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06478357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14137058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4700399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014756294","doi":"","title":"Decriminalisation of abortion in New Zealand and Australia.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Michael Smith Health Research BC","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Abortion; Obstetrics; Pregnancy; Genetics","score_opus":0.0951899628751632,"score_gpt":0.31523441171017447,"score_spread":0.22004444883501129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014756294","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009440262,0.009973119,0.00006241807,0.9606165,0.003448852,0.000025320058,0.000053929907,0.0000048474094,0.016374696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13943382,0.009588441,0.00024575004,0.81432337,0.013883567,0.00009492578,0.00005567604,0.000014839123,0.022359645],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945603,0.002023321,0.0007061805,0.00037781207,0.0013979228,0.00093451445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96361625,0.027056402,0.002645292,0.0006420258,0.003026412,0.0030136157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063396906,0.00016834508,0.0006686246,0.00078238983,0.0062070456,0.0022763514,0.0016926136,0.029586775,0.0035762407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04131615,0.00034212822,0.00037906895,0.0008529929,0.0055203857,0.002341412,0.0023889462,0.016622638,0.00047841127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005012922,0.00010963203,0.017636238,0.0011691317,0.00007574301,0.02599207,0.020834485,0.000098969314,0.0017959551,0.09106517,0.74466974,0.09605154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022832057,0.00016616251,0.044130143,0.0025038363,0.00014145064,0.010051918,0.015125858,0.0005081892,0.0013907271,0.03234125,0.8933041,0.000107975524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13642068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23860589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13642068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00949837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015885588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27125323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022117145","doi":"","title":"Finding Harmony: Law Society of British Columbia v Trinity Western University","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harmony (color); Law; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.026865599762932447,"score_gpt":0.26544551689438683,"score_spread":0.23857991713145438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022117145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11972761,0.003793271,0.0014979524,0.18079948,0.0013199153,0.00013627694,0.00035897753,0.00010786677,0.69225866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6762192,0.0013959975,0.00078954385,0.12099812,0.00018502508,0.00011616001,0.00018745086,0.00007014942,0.2000383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99320096,0.00065568474,0.00013449557,0.0005371589,0.0026473927,0.0028243177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971226,0.00079500186,0.00013423328,0.00011555532,0.0010857513,0.00074687856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021292018,0.00032362554,0.0003690907,0.0011953595,0.028773576,0.007825057,0.001890323,0.008047586,0.006965837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008011099,0.0004871677,0.00044056954,0.0016481573,0.006652469,0.0019907353,0.0030188248,0.009635727,0.00059844914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058641333,0.000064289045,0.010459539,0.00010816447,0.000034598488,0.003343801,0.042486247,0.00039609356,0.0007547868,0.6124696,0.3021596,0.027664576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047270485,0.000046303525,0.02722575,0.0003981605,0.00007354897,0.0006294184,0.05776425,0.0007896091,0.0012293658,0.030274924,0.88128996,0.00023141145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9719135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9889522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047679547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047679547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07937224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34594095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024489432","doi":"","title":"For Richer for Poorer, in Sickness and in Health: Should Australia Embrace Same-Sex Marriage?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Compromise; Legislature; Political science; Law; Opposition (politics); Charter; State (computer science); Politics","score_opus":0.05410616725400386,"score_gpt":0.33140042998520314,"score_spread":0.2772942627311993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024489432","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18161514,0.0042661247,0.00047628905,0.75762707,0.00073609076,0.0000543521,0.00004679897,0.000011627696,0.055166524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82839316,0.006407775,0.0014209907,0.13306932,0.00038349262,0.00008043553,0.0000244394,0.000014734298,0.030205715],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704653,0.0013848725,0.00008537466,0.0001428339,0.00041863462,0.00092185463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685645,0.00058162335,0.0004028545,0.00009679311,0.0004250283,0.0016371625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041413894,0.00012928063,0.0003644662,0.00048615158,0.008476474,0.0037562826,0.00088096544,0.0046993913,0.005017892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009149119,0.0002401638,0.00023697417,0.0007379087,0.00864858,0.0046097296,0.0058508953,0.005791012,0.0004023686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070403956,0.0003275186,0.037598282,0.0004758338,0.000026626376,0.0013453776,0.45368654,0.00012420102,0.0013594632,0.33339998,0.04764582,0.12393998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003809575,0.00025781879,0.09998276,0.0013144087,0.000038988455,0.0006189908,0.44627315,0.0002802298,0.00033787565,0.05492874,0.39583692,0.000091948634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15128684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34370717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15128684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059293658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020904155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30081248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024924570","doi":"","title":"Nothing to Declare: A Response to Grégoire Webber, Eric Mendelsohn, Robert Leckey, and Léonid Sirota on the Effects of the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fulbright Canada; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Declaration; Political science; Charter; Secularism; Nothing; State (computer science); Section (typography); Consistency (knowledge bases); Philosophy; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01874151271847742,"score_gpt":0.2758716884490087,"score_spread":0.2571301757305313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024924570","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004142165,0.0010184582,0.000061358005,0.9890842,0.0058649485,0.000012325553,0.00003442486,0.000016782138,0.0034934161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033172234,0.00041264048,0.000119081415,0.9826979,0.001338502,0.000016529624,0.000010862786,0.000026308877,0.012060847],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99214655,0.0017576289,0.00045135853,0.0012865588,0.002763857,0.001594072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97999966,0.0109443115,0.0007784565,0.00051667687,0.0048074713,0.002953486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009890192,0.0012836765,0.0014718756,0.0008853429,0.026205579,0.008907657,0.0052669244,0.052988485,0.0121520115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035095256,0.0013541385,0.0010881537,0.0013793921,0.013629763,0.0061247344,0.0037262926,0.065107994,0.005306695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013969896,0.000010164053,0.00013582682,0.000021052692,0.000004853335,0.00022101689,0.0016668711,0.000027338403,0.00008775311,0.007233698,0.9891354,0.001442109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029026629,0.000015375754,0.0007836316,0.00024107966,0.000014878948,0.00023278987,0.0072028334,0.00013025344,0.000258605,0.0027974334,0.98819065,0.00010345821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5264594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6685594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4735406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021937888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03720791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9526588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025288005","doi":"","title":"Issues of Vulnerability and Equality: The Emerging Need for Court Evaluations of Physicians' Fiduciary Duties in High Stakes End-of-Life Decisions.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Supreme court; Legislation; Law; Health care; Government (linguistics); Political science; Right to die; Duty","score_opus":0.16079091232259646,"score_gpt":0.4081624434655288,"score_spread":0.24737153114293237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025288005","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011831044,0.03351346,0.0061812927,0.87038463,0.0029605252,0.00006403,0.000087400855,0.00005260744,0.07492494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5195484,0.017757718,0.0065061017,0.4415342,0.008326511,0.0003512958,0.0001209998,0.00011401501,0.0057407087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8723809,0.074678965,0.0063259876,0.010492737,0.026289126,0.009832346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.455488,0.48656848,0.012410068,0.008180177,0.023133665,0.014219694],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.21846491,0.00082878605,0.0026146155,0.007501196,0.02129486,0.040763523,0.009509533,0.05543169,0.01002211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3668364,0.0013250748,0.001964709,0.0053346287,0.08932411,0.050131522,0.0236567,0.051872216,0.0011540833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040668026,0.000041586925,0.0015185211,0.00021846358,0.000040537223,0.0006168378,0.010332301,0.00022067984,0.000101458,0.9090103,0.04810778,0.029750872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062596046,0.000039266117,0.0018649459,0.0016863114,0.000042343534,0.00050221535,0.010827904,0.0007327434,0.00015770011,0.90098274,0.082976274,0.00012482925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02799238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043623827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21846491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0246999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04041363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9637719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026428217","doi":"","title":"ACPNS Legal Case Notes Series: 2018-46 Friends of Toronto Public Cemeteries Inc. v. Mount Pleasant Group of Cemeteries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Mount; Economic Justice; Law; Corporate governance; Statutory law; Political science; Archaeology; History; Public administration; Engineering; Management","score_opus":0.02608446234991215,"score_gpt":0.2602026360455099,"score_spread":0.23411817369559776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026428217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024327232,0.004695378,0.0006686967,0.056089148,0.0030166963,0.00034546555,0.00637802,0.00016601755,0.90431327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12866518,0.0025376307,0.00034968942,0.01609912,0.0005445472,0.0001598482,0.002107956,0.000065433494,0.8494708],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826175,0.00010298064,0.000057819812,0.00013536292,0.00087418663,0.0005678804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987226,0.00020989604,0.000072557574,0.000080580896,0.0005707258,0.00034357238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009085511,0.00057809555,0.00022496266,0.0011474196,0.012380006,0.002562489,0.0016720623,0.00628899,0.05988231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003925683,0.0005348817,0.00038701814,0.0012415006,0.0022642692,0.0012213953,0.0019683235,0.004794255,0.006241759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004509572,0.000040076004,0.0022513955,0.00007144361,0.000006225236,0.0020233563,0.0022944736,0.00011493805,0.00024027492,0.032292046,0.9518148,0.008805936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003003794,0.000023779556,0.01233021,0.00019958687,0.00001857662,0.00078728603,0.0030190223,0.00014855592,0.00045508688,0.0017111145,0.9812471,0.000029710674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84946847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95878166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15053153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029440762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030984135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30283606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026456222","doi":"10.1017/cls.2019.43","title":"Constitutional Law and Abortion in Saskatchewan:<i>The Freedom of Informed Choice (Abortions) Act</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitutionality; Law; Appeal; Abortion; Political science; Jurisdiction; Legislature; Politics; Legislation; Constitution","score_opus":0.020157667905535928,"score_gpt":0.27234238411107026,"score_spread":0.25218471620553434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026456222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22700597,0.030326791,0.0023984243,0.123567685,0.00079621933,0.00018499127,0.00086499297,0.00005546949,0.61479944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9144992,0.009755889,0.0009567079,0.022927588,0.00007880279,0.0001029229,0.00021001155,0.00002164462,0.051447198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974841,0.00087076926,0.000101995705,0.0002530907,0.00042224026,0.0008678013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958852,0.0021978782,0.00030532232,0.00022857773,0.0008564928,0.0005265629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031018958,0.00024850597,0.00027302682,0.0021083711,0.009408682,0.009620831,0.0010731417,0.0025553945,0.0064254627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004821812,0.00042663,0.00024562696,0.0037701766,0.019575734,0.0021561084,0.0038419433,0.0056590308,0.00039192406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024585244,0.000025362326,0.004928803,0.00008338905,0.00001609519,0.00074103253,0.0139450235,0.00047057407,0.0006445636,0.9487289,0.012387009,0.018004738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006338188,0.0000620193,0.064547375,0.0015901026,0.00007499414,0.0005759478,0.053838797,0.0009601172,0.0012026787,0.233263,0.64345515,0.00036639243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92093265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9655654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07906735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07837133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.100604795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56862646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033746043","doi":"10.21991/cf29403","title":"The Conscientious Objection of Medical Practitioners to the CPSO’s “Effective Referral” Requirement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Immorality; Conscientious objector; Law; Freedom of religion; Plaintiff; Sociology; Action (physics); Morality; Political science; Human rights","score_opus":0.040560526158433426,"score_gpt":0.3362132885655212,"score_spread":0.29565276240708777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033746043","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04411875,0.0018598596,0.004597899,0.6850475,0.005897691,0.0002736271,0.00017130357,0.00013610664,0.25789732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47159582,0.001368668,0.0031430214,0.46631297,0.004211918,0.0002542631,0.00006978971,0.00009684123,0.052946735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97646993,0.0048614503,0.0022796004,0.0024478908,0.008817502,0.005123684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9611366,0.021245493,0.0045413296,0.002756997,0.0062809703,0.0040385993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012509794,0.000268315,0.0004936123,0.00069821335,0.011468705,0.0049635875,0.0032957147,0.023037478,0.0050956975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06451294,0.0006983265,0.00089668937,0.0013369058,0.018465208,0.002456857,0.0056620315,0.022160161,0.0009305878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114966395,0.00008025549,0.014953244,0.00042799543,0.000032113207,0.0067365766,0.08452466,0.000566807,0.0027015302,0.571733,0.29960343,0.018525356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006630886,0.000059553266,0.021240504,0.0008648772,0.000024419642,0.0021582611,0.024897497,0.0006464178,0.00067011995,0.025207762,0.9239939,0.00017048528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34083927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47264105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34083927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021356078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032586783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6777107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034336303","doi":"","title":"The State of the Canadian Appointment Process After Liberal Reforms","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Process (computing); Political science; Public administration; Computer science","score_opus":0.02281408493943598,"score_gpt":0.24441896579537115,"score_spread":0.22160488085593516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034336303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7076089,0.0029219962,0.0022251464,0.04392321,0.0005237953,0.0003615475,0.0018421451,0.00014955283,0.24044362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96926415,0.0008028254,0.00092366483,0.0016533532,0.000078787074,0.00004323941,0.00030784702,0.000030664465,0.026895465],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9741941,0.0029519382,0.0005035829,0.0017128048,0.012389639,0.008248007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9759511,0.0035484873,0.0015720975,0.0011553678,0.01199221,0.005780658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01611034,0.00024052522,0.0004528642,0.0037673172,0.020323295,0.010762588,0.0024163174,0.0015959737,0.0060595116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03371584,0.0004356588,0.00049678166,0.0075381175,0.00807326,0.0018881776,0.0043616802,0.0024128614,0.00065054273],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057965115,0.00023623832,0.14992762,0.0003584733,0.00006197606,0.00080663885,0.18072411,0.0020462738,0.002354511,0.29090178,0.06624869,0.30575407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057017893,0.000120399214,0.41172042,0.00029601113,0.000033622695,0.000113098235,0.086228654,0.0017044322,0.0008576187,0.0061821314,0.4924522,0.00023439573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98912686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99316275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8204572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1795428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22385973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9516141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035835799","doi":"","title":"Ktunaxa Nation v. British Columbia: A Historical and Critical Analysis of Canadian Aboriginal Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Rim law & policy journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; History; Geography","score_opus":0.03663714682865829,"score_gpt":0.3253964875997724,"score_spread":0.2887593407711141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035835799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3351058,0.02412756,0.0009391719,0.08390686,0.0007699212,0.00014246606,0.0007132878,0.00008105443,0.5542138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9102138,0.007942501,0.00060496724,0.008366362,0.0000714484,0.00004886219,0.00012344468,0.00006681447,0.07256185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735034,0.00036534402,0.000060269842,0.00023502942,0.00073429366,0.0012547432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99447566,0.0019114689,0.00026628698,0.0001329408,0.002526938,0.00068671507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028396295,0.00038153643,0.00030553297,0.00560542,0.043973945,0.011513314,0.0025500658,0.004677747,0.006254718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009105661,0.00057640485,0.00030804306,0.0077975364,0.012770966,0.0029117437,0.0023450926,0.0067850524,0.0003045532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113688126,0.00005920136,0.016555453,0.00034596602,0.000033503457,0.002733667,0.31536484,0.00063292217,0.00083765556,0.48428363,0.121870205,0.057169285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016332975,0.000025075977,0.060295243,0.0012302226,0.00011035051,0.00045979337,0.30140096,0.00067100464,0.0008003323,0.016271554,0.6185277,0.0001913913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99935967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1855143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1855143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25987574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94468796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035901377","doi":"10.1017/9781108894760.007","title":"Too Much Information","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Enthusiasm; Hopefulness; Normative; Contingency; Foundation (evidence); Aside; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Positive economics; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.026157742208499687,"score_gpt":0.24406639980666223,"score_spread":0.21790865759816253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035901377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011190844,0.005847004,0.0055888197,0.120628655,0.021837315,0.00032795887,0.053600542,0.0026223564,0.7884282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0152768595,0.008303164,0.004357396,0.064174004,0.006547243,0.0003823424,0.042352296,0.0019068214,0.85669976],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995587,0.0011543685,0.00038523212,0.00060115336,0.0019210388,0.00035121842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776193,0.007130729,0.00094792596,0.0050114663,0.0074562607,0.0018342258],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004280858,0.00074462336,0.0011763866,0.0030868321,0.0022002042,0.00808324,0.0023939165,0.0040594647,0.7273023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03445706,0.00051782693,0.0006982124,0.0042418875,0.001338465,0.009339538,0.0055537787,0.0035481686,0.54705846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031067677,0.000010926684,0.00014375236,0.00025069233,0.00000488885,0.000045753444,0.00009274157,0.000025066396,0.00009545327,0.0060052825,0.92877185,0.06452244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045294537,0.0000041608464,0.00010229572,0.00017635817,0.0000023560021,0.00004074553,0.00008592143,0.000018371213,0.000053731965,0.0022173868,0.99728906,0.000005134775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042972243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054474943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7273023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023800544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005200475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38897014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037651573","doi":"","title":"Fundamental Rights for All","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law and economics; Law; Fundamental rights; Political science; Jurisprudence; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.07255290217692785,"score_gpt":0.3769380089216255,"score_spread":0.30438510674469765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037651573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013050727,0.004885843,0.0045330175,0.023156969,0.0014673383,0.00013312831,0.000797276,0.00015143822,0.96357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16558465,0.015127542,0.013571267,0.066568285,0.002456531,0.0009851087,0.0034334783,0.00033607762,0.73193705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99037105,0.0016431547,0.0004947148,0.0019522475,0.0031495374,0.002389388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954613,0.0007420525,0.00029515472,0.0014322915,0.0016418915,0.00042738512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005878424,0.00074796274,0.00096567447,0.0011503975,0.00842368,0.008952442,0.0023308375,0.0069244625,0.057473876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00951305,0.0004624969,0.0009869701,0.0014714621,0.017135695,0.0057024267,0.0062088016,0.008702112,0.022260921],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065590693,0.0000065449917,0.000120096855,0.00006841457,0.000008404304,0.00003770311,0.0009379945,0.000047451616,0.00012921524,0.9289718,0.053035416,0.01663046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007683128,0.0000072965913,0.00043109976,0.00020723835,0.0000068132913,0.000075636046,0.00029802645,0.000023438777,0.00007477796,0.053230546,0.9456222,0.00001519747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15105383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1407886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15105383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008587572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032763943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30034924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037701917","doi":"","title":"The Price of God","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Conviction; Damages; Plaintiff; Law; Jurisprudence; Duty; Multiculturalism; Political science; Charter; Duty to warn; Sociology","score_opus":0.05064240720482203,"score_gpt":0.3521020444818382,"score_spread":0.30145963727701613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037701917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007966005,0.059822418,0.0010461101,0.19091307,0.0049199895,0.000025897793,0.00014415346,0.000050432216,0.7351119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48908523,0.056544412,0.0015088816,0.08478047,0.0025501128,0.000036444675,0.00016483579,0.00010869284,0.3652209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984792,0.00038430275,0.000035958306,0.00016284689,0.0006864033,0.00025129877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987841,0.00034072986,0.00008353688,0.00014134131,0.0004163813,0.00023386619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011055782,0.00027471883,0.00033561816,0.00069043064,0.00642206,0.005146706,0.0006888378,0.00216549,0.020042852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004443928,0.00015678848,0.00019594577,0.0007067908,0.015825445,0.004378173,0.002548806,0.0047024568,0.00246422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015737736,0.0000070391966,0.00032402718,0.00010651077,0.0000061145242,0.0001299187,0.0050199907,0.000042228254,0.00007824591,0.77620053,0.17620465,0.041865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037363766,0.0000069613575,0.0005431245,0.00022422976,0.0000027460812,0.00011469871,0.0024132722,0.000021340999,0.00003528546,0.020503988,0.97612584,0.0000048445545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18143769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27649897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18143769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0092635825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009445596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3607632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30387997","doi":"10.1023/a:1009433703175","title":"Beyond the Myths: Equality, Impartiality, and Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Dignity; Economic Justice; Law; Supreme court; Mythology; Political science; Human rights; Legislature; Sociology","score_opus":0.0348957093887775,"score_gpt":0.3421791049199109,"score_spread":0.3072833955311334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30387997","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04849483,0.049140662,0.01161008,0.5529866,0.0022149542,0.000052725947,0.00003607746,0.000041269475,0.33542275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9332689,0.015116373,0.0021378703,0.032732774,0.0013791148,0.00010207927,0.00001653818,0.000040151637,0.01520622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876673,0.0089859655,0.00023923244,0.00046007353,0.001580691,0.0010667455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98828363,0.008297945,0.0010593693,0.0008473406,0.00075099326,0.00076075643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0123833,0.0005272882,0.00074961607,0.0017239001,0.009658661,0.016190935,0.0013741421,0.004998038,0.0025732962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015713824,0.00031555543,0.0003876433,0.001383334,0.13527913,0.021133339,0.009663711,0.010983664,0.00042181148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010565541,0.000022537928,0.0002903535,0.00004295853,0.0000052357714,0.00006018459,0.026768308,0.00007027614,0.000048074722,0.9602021,0.0046349955,0.007844414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010564305,0.000023379558,0.0005600543,0.0003369195,0.0000054355646,0.00011306775,0.02823516,0.00011942265,0.00017086793,0.91224706,0.058163878,0.000014069917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006298363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059053106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016190935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008120667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009032747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06548989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038822611","doi":"","title":"ACPNS Legal Case Notes Series: 2020-72Karahalios v. Conservative Party of Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Series (stratigraphy); Political science; Law; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.019512049678941108,"score_gpt":0.2353725101636172,"score_spread":0.2158604604846761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038822611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017016243,0.0025421134,0.00043481018,0.029138345,0.001713044,0.00036554606,0.005992157,0.00014354306,0.9426543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06529998,0.0010892899,0.00037356105,0.018181577,0.00019944888,0.00012523972,0.001469938,0.000056289933,0.9132047],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967313,0.00011837208,0.000068268564,0.00022490126,0.0015439315,0.0013132212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828714,0.00020526383,0.00003941332,0.00006070481,0.0009845136,0.000422914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012863422,0.0006270805,0.00031118316,0.001957438,0.017980652,0.0048721866,0.0021412596,0.009220037,0.05033827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036259242,0.0006647333,0.00062367116,0.0018375323,0.0019408496,0.0011597516,0.0017651578,0.005355439,0.0066753053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000885938,0.00008249224,0.003204403,0.00009155936,0.00001596241,0.0014587251,0.0018837057,0.00024158895,0.0006317945,0.07463179,0.90388405,0.013785344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038394777,0.000027367927,0.011730312,0.00017275104,0.000034919056,0.00029796857,0.0023065237,0.00032654926,0.00072094885,0.0028016407,0.9814911,0.00005161785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9808771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05033827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049799852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.102625184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3613249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039686058","doi":"10.12745/et.23.1.4174","title":"How Marston Read His Merchant: Ruled Women and Structures of Circulation in The Dutch Courtesan","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Early Theatre","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dramaturgy; Romance; Revels; Comedy; Art; Literature; HERO; Embodied cognition; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029906392756716395,"score_gpt":0.2707837065411239,"score_spread":0.2408773137844075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039686058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25443575,0.004467263,0.002764657,0.0172779,0.00047717878,0.000031452677,0.00009880195,0.000029136865,0.7204179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9302292,0.00059009047,0.00028998012,0.0006796468,0.00006510217,0.000011871814,0.000020542158,0.00008062062,0.06803303],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981406,0.0010775733,0.000030684823,0.00018189668,0.0002840004,0.00028519513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992706,0.00042249335,0.000056969515,0.000047032696,0.000083258245,0.00011960226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012437168,0.0002711983,0.00024161143,0.0005934632,0.009987078,0.011732271,0.0007128756,0.0019665707,0.009921831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031296278,0.00032190362,0.00014849259,0.0008044304,0.016688615,0.0049096276,0.0028587203,0.0029135384,0.0007129853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004771517,0.0000171125,0.0006270778,0.00004748393,0.0000058088244,0.0010180793,0.49090016,0.00010779237,0.00080399035,0.4865321,0.013789992,0.0061027994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019268668,0.000019386374,0.0018769737,0.00024608057,0.000008266686,0.00055186707,0.23445341,0.000263886,0.0008292339,0.029515045,0.7321829,0.000033679426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09807595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17861061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09807595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010827955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027577078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19501019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040625182","doi":"","title":"Alberta v. Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony (Women's Court of Canada)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Section (typography); Law; Context (archaeology); High Court; Political science; Government (linguistics); History; Business","score_opus":0.008182076945008415,"score_gpt":0.2604739607944227,"score_spread":0.25229188384941426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3040625182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040630005,0.006877896,0.0006751069,0.04367858,0.0012718431,0.00014377393,0.0016549216,0.00011620736,0.9049516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30677646,0.0023199017,0.0008675022,0.038575944,0.00013562331,0.00006645876,0.00044843706,0.000055715882,0.650754],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805874,0.00010145543,0.000031742547,0.00020512451,0.0008138086,0.0007890803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990188,0.0002273,0.00003856948,0.00002824873,0.0004382664,0.0002487711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072049914,0.00026407943,0.00023999832,0.0006080194,0.017347364,0.0053389114,0.0011501625,0.0048355856,0.018814204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033920377,0.0003932656,0.0002887383,0.0011422748,0.002138766,0.00090344896,0.0010198564,0.0032070074,0.0013748942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048566413,0.000023059816,0.0041440804,0.00007663454,0.000012807649,0.0015699161,0.0080334805,0.00022013077,0.00070223084,0.3992169,0.55630404,0.029648138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002029132,0.000015041944,0.011221487,0.00014956295,0.000024258932,0.00021198635,0.0042864364,0.00017218877,0.00039864765,0.0070170388,0.9764267,0.000056290915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9832333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99551165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033199675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033199675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062173102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24088162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041932618","doi":"","title":"Ontario's Human Rights Tribunal Bungles the School Boards' Human Rights Duty to Accommodate Students with Disabilities: \"J.F. v. Waterloo Cathofic District School Board\" - An Erroneous Rejection of a Student's Request to Bring His Autism Service Dog to School","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Duty; Human rights; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03166711377603512,"score_gpt":0.31535381446435784,"score_spread":0.2836867006883227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041932618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038402524,0.0037502267,0.0012287295,0.45649916,0.008282045,0.0001620515,0.000865729,0.00027719582,0.49053237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20381282,0.0019045533,0.0013547624,0.12562571,0.0005907854,0.00007103793,0.00016302294,0.00017529987,0.6663019],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934175,0.00056287734,0.0002034243,0.0004204615,0.0032158052,0.0021799293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99363303,0.0020592292,0.00026980106,0.0002540553,0.0024095387,0.0013743482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030222982,0.00040706928,0.00046039428,0.00070929417,0.030670004,0.009290958,0.001671954,0.013590464,0.015222909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01030491,0.00082494185,0.0005510111,0.0010988697,0.00949857,0.0018675518,0.002409911,0.011890308,0.0020829025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043067754,0.000024451898,0.004128728,0.00007972202,0.000014215491,0.00051966944,0.011073882,0.00008690215,0.0006130015,0.13033576,0.84085053,0.012229997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023078725,0.000015948917,0.0070808823,0.000115877534,0.000025658182,0.00009003319,0.0050695757,0.00009523421,0.0003778592,0.0024073115,0.9846469,0.000051640458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9802813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99602854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05391083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05391083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.123381816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39115226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043873528","doi":"10.3138/9781487514976","title":"A Reconciliation without Recollection?: An Investigation of the Foundations of Aboriginal Law in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Recall; Law; Political science; History; Psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.03354133464071995,"score_gpt":0.30882682894395913,"score_spread":0.2752854943032392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043873528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21717463,0.021274831,0.0016843986,0.09237621,0.0004220533,0.00016760158,0.00034535173,0.00005221411,0.6665028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92114055,0.011494321,0.0012850637,0.0071089515,0.0000694361,0.000060139006,0.000100329074,0.000047527068,0.0586937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972556,0.0005373232,0.000038085895,0.00015879085,0.0009879932,0.0010222652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99645436,0.0015274723,0.00016440365,0.00010943637,0.0011965977,0.00054770027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002345546,0.00029236235,0.0004294835,0.002624582,0.036467653,0.012772041,0.0026871036,0.00277442,0.004390581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005905759,0.0003711368,0.00028374157,0.006090235,0.02387445,0.003585849,0.004000354,0.005108928,0.00025132383],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016400198,0.00003424751,0.0030342238,0.000095756026,0.000009101383,0.00047624682,0.093651414,0.000433601,0.00013262838,0.8570045,0.029744785,0.015367081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026424477,0.00002888339,0.02052898,0.00074594497,0.000052805502,0.00036013624,0.29759133,0.0022977458,0.0004934335,0.12565674,0.55209553,0.00012203927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99551815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22626013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22626013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3224084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8974286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044446119","doi":"","title":"“Sunny ways” and broken promises : Tsleil-Waututh Nation v. Canada (2018) and the Liberal government’s relationship with Indigenous Nations in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Saint Mary's University Institutional Repository (Saint Mary's University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Government (linguistics); Political economy; Public administration; Law; Development economics; Economic history; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.009079590372363196,"score_gpt":0.16632138077604358,"score_spread":0.1572417904036804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044446119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45173594,0.0065388503,0.0009233089,0.14771803,0.00062041194,0.0000893069,0.00028290213,0.000034461988,0.39205685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9370732,0.0018207433,0.00022044739,0.013943199,0.000045689067,0.000028142851,0.00004827292,0.000022847922,0.046797454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668354,0.00040761413,0.0000390598,0.0002593873,0.00097366166,0.0016367327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778074,0.0006786279,0.00018141922,0.000060891507,0.0006481385,0.0006502444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018922529,0.00028850438,0.00027683197,0.0010347358,0.05282571,0.012861555,0.0016608783,0.005135938,0.0046211975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004469736,0.00034880755,0.0002652189,0.0015712775,0.023133308,0.0032685832,0.005069995,0.009677859,0.00023578215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035022058,0.000028525565,0.008141847,0.00007286023,0.000014832976,0.002363989,0.39893022,0.00025823782,0.0004885919,0.5235719,0.05626067,0.009833332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012649727,0.000016925962,0.015402769,0.00046645806,0.000039360984,0.00036385068,0.5796212,0.00037142602,0.0005816084,0.018817488,0.3841649,0.00014143864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9908035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13283858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13283858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17386836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96381587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046699092","doi":"10.29173/alr2604","title":"Sexual Regulation and the Law: A Canadian Perspective, Richard Jochelson and James Gacek, eds. (Bradford, Ont: Demeter Press, 2019)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Art","score_opus":0.030927180362360314,"score_gpt":0.2905075060323167,"score_spread":0.25958032566995637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046699092","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010525027,0.806443,0.00046681453,0.11489186,0.0021135986,0.000018244693,0.00019089002,0.000025524681,0.07479757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05077447,0.8826124,0.00091627217,0.017256562,0.0017782042,0.000039729595,0.00018333342,0.000045041004,0.046393827],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99579775,0.00064376876,0.00011477792,0.0002927289,0.0021684077,0.0009824903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970294,0.0008068981,0.00019037847,0.00009424894,0.0012139239,0.0006651031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048126886,0.0009404531,0.0009029132,0.004575771,0.010593034,0.011948656,0.0030886317,0.0067651453,0.010132052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006976598,0.00080164574,0.0007166953,0.008622364,0.024431692,0.004781274,0.0021723155,0.0047210925,0.0010893424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025565345,0.000053401083,0.0013589642,0.0005934699,0.000016286736,0.00019448533,0.0064604967,0.00050374534,0.00010369806,0.3187615,0.55209523,0.119833104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000969735,0.000009802148,0.0076869153,0.0018710895,0.00002145454,0.00019075212,0.007806741,0.00020355207,0.00009451646,0.033388663,0.94866765,0.000049145023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9811452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9881352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11056809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11056809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25087333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80223143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048673838","doi":"","title":"Pour que droit et familles fassent bon ménage : étude sur la conscience du droit en matière conjugale Making Law and Families Work Together: A Study on Legal Consciousness in Conjugal Setting","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Humanities; Legal consciousness; Political science; Sociology; Law; Ethnology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011462741753346672,"score_gpt":0.28314728964878083,"score_spread":0.27168454789543417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048673838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893426,0.00048298918,0.000078118675,0.0014728174,0.000016021142,0.000010570147,0.00002567734,0.0000016871977,0.008569499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960084,0.0002317052,0.00003031995,0.00022808574,0.000007686706,0.000009670463,0.000014347914,0.0000018262057,0.00346794],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845624,0.00068672997,0.000033948734,0.0001298674,0.0002403466,0.00045288293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967083,0.001394787,0.0005859828,0.00009277865,0.0005256304,0.00069245585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027838794,0.00028532013,0.00029435314,0.0011490423,0.009144853,0.00376794,0.0009500567,0.0012119752,0.0058610276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051671867,0.00022159147,0.00027031548,0.0010327101,0.005820641,0.0020973163,0.0018001727,0.002167629,0.0003463964],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019858962,0.00009140682,0.040023927,0.00003071733,0.00000681253,0.00060291693,0.9480519,0.000024935103,0.00029684865,0.0039068777,0.0009767079,0.0059670517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002805095,0.000036533613,0.1077155,0.00007345075,0.000004394358,0.0001212171,0.8784562,0.000053375796,0.00009548872,0.0002164319,0.013208911,0.000015710095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.556822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6551956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.556822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0112787755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074875513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89157593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048850375","doi":"","title":"Book Review: D’un océan à l’autre . . . recension de Nicole Laviolette et Julie Audet, L’essentiel du droit de la famille dans les provinces et territoires de common law au Canada","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016499674226058882,"score_gpt":0.280056274338826,"score_spread":0.26355660011276716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048850375","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000102560065,0.24808411,0.00023139681,0.5467034,0.196843,0.000033210057,0.00029242373,0.00004710495,0.007662825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022682429,0.23689583,0.00065428735,0.5143182,0.17860812,0.00014653447,0.00043525427,0.00016197056,0.06651156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938917,0.0015490905,0.00057520514,0.0005707477,0.003064163,0.00034906296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9366987,0.021182058,0.0026453964,0.0015211346,0.03399945,0.003953284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006376966,0.0010155452,0.0024846618,0.0048749805,0.0030530249,0.009622899,0.002718753,0.008075108,0.022879565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04910179,0.00083051575,0.0010535783,0.005175498,0.0037609963,0.010201897,0.0025712019,0.0109224,0.013567955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033958984,0.000002247105,0.000023807845,0.00015653367,0.0000030758044,0.000011007927,0.000026737547,0.00000615204,0.000008980631,0.00039481517,0.99487585,0.0044874516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005123305,0.000002574136,0.0000950349,0.0008147793,0.0000071257277,0.000064694425,0.00007284988,0.0000073840633,0.000011328986,0.00037347953,0.9985367,0.000008996458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055228725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16439731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9447713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010313395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022733228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109814465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W305587855","doi":"","title":"A Note on the Role of North America in the Evolution of Anglicanism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecclesiology; Windsor; Bishops; History; Law; Colonialism; Convention; Eucharist; Archbishop; Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy; Classics; Political science","score_opus":0.028137654460657472,"score_gpt":0.31848512178875443,"score_spread":0.29034746732809696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W305587855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23463075,0.045792792,0.0014718394,0.05897203,0.0014626349,0.00002191255,0.00006352936,0.000058260077,0.6575262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9507487,0.004569505,0.0008363827,0.0049080555,0.00037273642,0.00002979741,0.00001602272,0.000045622022,0.038473144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996117,0.0022651253,0.00009498289,0.00038134732,0.0003585027,0.00078309234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975998,0.0013166658,0.00019140425,0.00015919613,0.00041381663,0.00031917705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038423669,0.00020540389,0.00028460668,0.001318661,0.015384377,0.008390972,0.0007242568,0.0014128232,0.0056896578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029844642,0.00032052404,0.00018555029,0.0013318508,0.018568227,0.0039201155,0.0041732076,0.0036742124,0.00036474425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053776745,0.00002152292,0.00563449,0.00012399092,0.000009925864,0.00070970925,0.32852167,0.000057937672,0.00058012625,0.6184651,0.013934355,0.03188737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010549307,0.000039141716,0.020552784,0.00060624775,0.000015652991,0.00053601246,0.1057613,0.00008550071,0.00042644935,0.026114266,0.8457911,0.000061011087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.095367715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2870794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095367715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00877037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054086926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18962526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W306376142","doi":"","title":"The roman catholic-united church dialogue in Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of ecumenical studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bishops; Protestantism; Church history; Context (archaeology); Canon law; Law; Sociology; Christianity; Religious studies; Political science; Theology; History; Classics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.057315119776066015,"score_gpt":0.34468726783328,"score_spread":0.287372148057214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W306376142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10586562,0.07227946,0.00084711704,0.17349719,0.003494263,0.00016335228,0.0011508169,0.000178186,0.642524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82072115,0.020559398,0.0008694293,0.017817078,0.0003118585,0.00007760499,0.00031281402,0.00010302141,0.1392276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965342,0.00056680624,0.0000620074,0.00023123488,0.0009152305,0.0016905352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749315,0.00044916364,0.00010038123,0.00004559566,0.0006794346,0.0012322557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016076901,0.00039776103,0.0005192804,0.0016007547,0.037952375,0.009858537,0.002016055,0.0031803134,0.0142496005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030615386,0.00037337377,0.00023768854,0.0061567198,0.010296302,0.0021500804,0.004592854,0.0041075666,0.0007064271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000851898,0.000073488714,0.004496201,0.000501417,0.00001527755,0.00155043,0.17280391,0.000438872,0.0004931623,0.44423366,0.30621478,0.06909359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009978394,0.000009082165,0.005748851,0.00034350605,0.0000066094826,0.000114887036,0.07012718,0.00017753625,0.000107184576,0.0033415067,0.9199637,0.000050029856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9955108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99808913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19783807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19783807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24211268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9303942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3071865145","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v10i2.9478","title":"On Sexual Consent in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Spouse; Criminal code; Criminal law; Dilemma; KISS (TNC); Context (archaeology); Sexual assault; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine; Medical emergency; Computer science","score_opus":0.10991924886255602,"score_gpt":0.3537178499598585,"score_spread":0.24379860109730248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3071865145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11254532,0.020619318,0.0019613428,0.2738009,0.0021709877,0.00029683494,0.00083002396,0.00007081384,0.5877044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7613162,0.017877327,0.0019498622,0.08981136,0.00036239947,0.00014130455,0.00031949906,0.00007022346,0.12815188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98863775,0.0014492358,0.00038612232,0.00088500755,0.003920735,0.004721139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854659,0.0045730965,0.00051964674,0.00046763904,0.005631223,0.0033425598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006618204,0.00033784716,0.00046319107,0.0013798521,0.026417982,0.006535035,0.002148339,0.0057309177,0.011146909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021861162,0.0005360439,0.0005001325,0.0026835878,0.011970473,0.0029460746,0.005757377,0.007961374,0.00050624734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039895975,0.00005828072,0.00816076,0.00015891159,0.000013385621,0.0012490022,0.028802976,0.0005506209,0.0003504542,0.7980365,0.11165903,0.05092008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006208429,0.00005978,0.025125902,0.0009861828,0.00004566101,0.00059728225,0.030835818,0.0010921407,0.0005252701,0.042691816,0.8977415,0.0002364286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99573827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99695563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15339443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15339443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42577523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9819425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080466347","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190922771.003.0003","title":"The Metropolis in “Old World” Constitutional Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stalemate; Megacity; Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Constitutional law; Sovereignty; Constitutionalism; Urbanization; Political economy; Law; Economy; Sociology; Democracy; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.05235630775962753,"score_gpt":0.3117262499952617,"score_spread":0.2593699422356342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080466347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04287115,0.008420941,0.0028134678,0.02089548,0.0004937928,0.000016567037,0.00005957747,0.000043819793,0.9243853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9072197,0.002115159,0.0008079785,0.0029843817,0.00032542582,0.000036688867,0.00004741029,0.00003763619,0.08642562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998749,0.00072967,0.00003102755,0.00015702697,0.00020054753,0.00013270194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992417,0.000380346,0.000070078895,0.00013547343,0.0000868764,0.00008563528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014245436,0.0001566504,0.0001660749,0.0009771702,0.0041913535,0.007523199,0.0005957394,0.0010904102,0.0062675234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017321537,0.0001813209,0.00010954556,0.0012066155,0.023770152,0.004619669,0.0028202757,0.002744787,0.00051484694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012964687,0.0000020849357,0.000075464864,0.000005608332,4.6358133e-7,0.000022266711,0.001973729,0.00004822971,0.00002411618,0.9942146,0.0020722423,0.0015597842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064633014,0.000010709874,0.0012788968,0.00012844185,0.000003917724,0.000089985966,0.006510448,0.00031362483,0.00024770663,0.31861964,0.6727778,0.000012392478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0123983435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032150723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0123983435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008417864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002650773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061076105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082707933","doi":"10.3138/9781487533915-009","title":"7. The Constitution of Canada and Beyond","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.020435847335075114,"score_gpt":0.21309275748465667,"score_spread":0.19265691014958156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082707933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017819658,0.009822919,0.00035388302,0.017487282,0.0005885442,0.000024667734,0.00046801515,0.00003658074,0.96943617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07728589,0.006904053,0.0006904836,0.012967211,0.00034407133,0.00007854483,0.00026657135,0.00010088347,0.90136224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984334,0.00016689465,0.00002946627,0.00013762395,0.000586149,0.0006464016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905986,0.00016948723,0.000029786686,0.000064843975,0.000530993,0.00014509737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077363884,0.00077589066,0.0004752838,0.002003524,0.016725989,0.011062584,0.0014573898,0.0073929406,0.040668163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023374388,0.0005227393,0.00042074829,0.0036295764,0.007757721,0.0032792715,0.0018321387,0.0048222006,0.0039933384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038881735,0.0000054900684,0.000077875084,0.000024074061,0.0000012367148,0.000034832316,0.0015957521,0.000043789074,0.00002681067,0.8777546,0.11601569,0.0044160094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039966817,0.0000015691883,0.0005188324,0.00010178693,0.0000034922834,0.000021542202,0.0011367673,0.000037283226,0.00006131367,0.037326355,0.96077585,0.000011167849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9708383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.987817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056043066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056043066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.084825814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40662283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085997748","doi":"10.1177/0067205x20955069","title":"Indigenous Constitutionalism and Dispute Resolution Outside the Courts: An Invitation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Law; Indigenous rights; Institution; Political science; Liberalism; Supreme court; Sociology; Constitutional law; Human rights; Democracy","score_opus":0.06827181375930244,"score_gpt":0.3446184206711721,"score_spread":0.27634660691186963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3085997748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060141124,0.03900836,0.0076046437,0.20716228,0.00090905675,0.00008432248,0.00006515477,0.000042125852,0.6849829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95340985,0.0075335475,0.0015155595,0.011410227,0.00059986487,0.000047785663,0.000018994324,0.000014617887,0.025449578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914274,0.003652553,0.00017644528,0.00049762527,0.0024031745,0.0018427079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899743,0.0066537037,0.00044759805,0.0006063563,0.0018625915,0.0004553848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008531829,0.00014018815,0.000317007,0.0015311511,0.008778594,0.009681008,0.001532404,0.003777085,0.0038894762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0110967215,0.00021765438,0.0003864311,0.0016590789,0.024840603,0.0037083675,0.0039762165,0.0038456114,0.00018469033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040519994,0.0000098551845,0.0003031403,0.00004070693,0.000003846896,0.00009438047,0.0039493665,0.00014487516,0.00007036975,0.98702973,0.0034776407,0.0048720776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046594425,0.000040151357,0.006073157,0.0008766372,0.000059614566,0.00027267274,0.018355763,0.0014543288,0.00073354895,0.47167847,0.50035465,0.00005454812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5382903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6676445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5382903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025084773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04713602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92885756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3086547516","doi":"","title":"ACPNS Legal Case Notes Series: 2020-119 Council of Canadians with Disabilities v. British Columbia (Attorney General)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Madam; Constitutionality; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.02179548739385438,"score_gpt":0.21342346473489474,"score_spread":0.19162797734104037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3086547516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010295818,0.0032878548,0.0003938225,0.04317147,0.0022782288,0.00040128463,0.0073979734,0.0001834118,0.9325901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047672916,0.001175488,0.00042061915,0.033849,0.0002895947,0.00019903327,0.0022877597,0.000074242904,0.91403127],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968177,0.0001302884,0.000066166576,0.000184246,0.0015399962,0.0012615027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781406,0.00025751005,0.000049569546,0.00006969624,0.0012929128,0.0005163009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013755562,0.00075100106,0.0003501689,0.0021304179,0.01778847,0.0047969697,0.0022885904,0.012068717,0.055574622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043631196,0.00076045713,0.00069470884,0.0018417861,0.001785721,0.0011880526,0.0018285504,0.007060388,0.010543557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042319436,0.000057915735,0.0012586247,0.00004609134,0.000006266195,0.00055292284,0.00056561787,0.00010228532,0.00025722227,0.022574408,0.96667606,0.007860249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005141345,0.00002901319,0.01219748,0.00021204865,0.000033606495,0.0002625573,0.002089156,0.00027913623,0.0005653426,0.0027984136,0.98141956,0.00006226133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97319615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9919689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055574622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033376798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07540442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24216676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W308702549","doi":"","title":"Protecting the Vulnerable from the Vulnerable: Child Protection and Diversity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forum on public policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Legislation; Child protection; Mandate; Neglect; Public relations; Political science; Law; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.05556074677366692,"score_gpt":0.2844961682675558,"score_spread":0.22893542149388887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W308702549","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066308044,0.036583994,0.0018092023,0.30485797,0.001182722,0.00012663857,0.00040094985,0.000062967585,0.5886676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78324825,0.026662474,0.0020249167,0.030689988,0.00047585045,0.00012609588,0.00011732789,0.00005202016,0.15660316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968708,0.00080674596,0.000055199416,0.00019983544,0.00077074405,0.0012967499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975915,0.0005005593,0.00016626007,0.00012501529,0.000401023,0.0012156582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021990687,0.00025629022,0.00028455022,0.0006601898,0.016217997,0.006884684,0.0014060289,0.0034691868,0.014004614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026709007,0.00020369134,0.0002088128,0.0012328827,0.021412713,0.003174523,0.007545291,0.003046602,0.00075009343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003611459,0.000051874835,0.020158721,0.0005247454,0.00001241368,0.0013745228,0.19319904,0.0002210722,0.00088544993,0.48084673,0.1760131,0.12667622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004404607,0.000023524291,0.015860133,0.001047813,0.000008829741,0.0007023917,0.062485304,0.000051644216,0.0001706021,0.026409341,0.89320916,0.00002677956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79554117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91692066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79554117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038544524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04871253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4113258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088825059","doi":"10.1017/9781139236249","title":"A.V. Dicey and the Common Law Constitutional Tradition: A Legal Turn of Mind","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Principle of legality; Positive law; Philosophy of law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Constitution; Political science; Legal formalism; Public law; Constitutional law; Philosophy; Power (physics); Sovereignty; Black letter law; Politics; Private law; Physics","score_opus":0.04034143043089519,"score_gpt":0.28982081865892456,"score_spread":0.24947938822802937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088825059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00929415,0.06647677,0.002975836,0.071604125,0.0014878882,0.000016526508,0.00003420204,0.00003734592,0.84807324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6234295,0.05422909,0.0049806098,0.034447968,0.0028774687,0.00016038108,0.00008073963,0.00011180922,0.27968255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984497,0.00080328924,0.00003344259,0.00019273021,0.00035994517,0.00016088352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816364,0.0014049652,0.00008215477,0.00009062831,0.0001474792,0.00011128821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018527146,0.00030188353,0.00040966764,0.0019488046,0.008452682,0.008448203,0.00075906597,0.003845133,0.0032958947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042975266,0.00022286832,0.00018024252,0.0023278478,0.02264779,0.010091201,0.0024606078,0.005292586,0.00045924724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014377168,0.0000023560874,0.00002827333,0.000009958047,3.504878e-7,0.000020095002,0.0025628156,0.000019576857,0.000009978,0.9863171,0.008340408,0.0026876563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005173583,0.000010875567,0.00030991345,0.00027888062,0.0000021786366,0.000102458005,0.004484363,0.00015488663,0.00005808935,0.43692702,0.55765736,0.000008824445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0176704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028809005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0176704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008945646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062789437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064905465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092005763","doi":"10.22215/etd/2010-08925","title":"Dual charging practices in cases of domestic violence : perpetuating (in)equalities","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Auteur theory; Art; Political science; Art history","score_opus":0.06788185840692859,"score_gpt":0.418538121976494,"score_spread":0.35065626356956536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092005763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.881107,0.0012565649,0.004420051,0.012761891,0.0002416007,0.00008378524,0.00006718915,0.000046100587,0.10001588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934437,0.00038954726,0.0005075153,0.00057575887,0.00006499287,0.00002715566,0.00001656551,0.000012755464,0.0049619866],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98800546,0.006588247,0.0007228563,0.0007316101,0.0013626737,0.0025891073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9730804,0.01319517,0.007009018,0.0030837283,0.0015638613,0.0020678525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065271547,0.00023676615,0.00036819102,0.0034435338,0.008603957,0.006349692,0.001436917,0.0028147777,0.009299248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054949895,0.00046682605,0.00037110993,0.0031421995,0.0072021633,0.0048924303,0.010034633,0.002934589,0.0007436129],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018973586,0.00038141065,0.21301629,0.00026208657,0.000064205335,0.015449382,0.34164435,0.0003152749,0.0008004612,0.2546016,0.011495701,0.16177945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004671266,0.00014763072,0.10267381,0.0014215688,0.00012505644,0.039446738,0.59765166,0.0025575736,0.0026706236,0.11495274,0.13816926,0.00013654689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006803084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009478596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009299248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003483583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032455702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034519315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092071758","doi":"10.7202/1071747ar","title":"A Tale of Two Metaphors: A Narrative Take on the Canadian Constitution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Narrative; Metaphor; Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07055643361135451,"score_gpt":0.3173559824964412,"score_spread":0.2467995488850867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092071758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24025108,0.009334264,0.011256523,0.108992726,0.0012881702,0.00012157462,0.0005165264,0.0001472232,0.62809193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9671252,0.001708204,0.0021727146,0.0021754722,0.000059528196,0.000034551947,0.000082187,0.00007386796,0.026568454],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99635845,0.0016823467,0.000041812113,0.00026907114,0.00093189266,0.00071644405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979722,0.00086881197,0.00012876617,0.00011823034,0.00046923882,0.00044280454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025977672,0.0008518323,0.00041007885,0.0031854936,0.03734144,0.011305282,0.0019139224,0.002927038,0.005690284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005641954,0.00036446602,0.0004411608,0.0032694764,0.03942823,0.007192296,0.0046791057,0.0047691213,0.00031021395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028348388,0.000009089318,0.00089764106,0.000048669644,0.0000052257424,0.0007807555,0.5262675,0.00019189695,0.0003515877,0.4489315,0.015327727,0.0071601113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008903516,0.000011610293,0.0015017352,0.00023975903,0.00001485727,0.0003752997,0.51381636,0.00043293982,0.00026413592,0.030552432,0.4527232,0.00005872579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9068074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9415409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09319258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.068661965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035871096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49817973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092965598","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197516744.013.5","title":"E Pluribus Plures","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Aotearoa; Legal pluralism; Colonialism; Indigenous rights; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Normative; Corporate governance; State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Political economy; Environmental ethics; Comparative law; Human rights; Politics; Legal realism; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04158811126374558,"score_gpt":0.24524430532230695,"score_spread":0.2036561940585614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092965598","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002169072,0.0037580347,0.0021002302,0.0019213347,0.0010285228,0.00004109005,0.00025842822,0.00009985135,0.9886234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.078021936,0.007859781,0.0027877854,0.00083085697,0.00095358293,0.00015922367,0.000519845,0.0002981961,0.90856874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874204,0.00042908083,0.00007983019,0.00023210839,0.0003688404,0.00014805746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993494,0.00022966177,0.00007309282,0.00012696003,0.00015804003,0.00006276232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011503454,0.00069682143,0.0003614372,0.0015779284,0.0027559549,0.0069708857,0.0005587778,0.0012152281,0.069429964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018966737,0.00030165823,0.00024267018,0.0027113173,0.003904269,0.005073751,0.003668197,0.0027455245,0.023301998],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016097738,0.00001747653,0.0002664638,0.00012442826,0.0000038230555,0.00018477609,0.002901694,0.000079151025,0.0004039772,0.8589856,0.06061314,0.07640329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018948274,0.0000044776907,0.00013190527,0.00004795368,8.7265147e-7,0.00008801243,0.00030150654,0.00003806033,0.00013432086,0.008137576,0.9911108,0.000002660748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008073917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008220996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069429964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027455296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002183079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23226637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093336479","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197516744.013.7","title":"Legal Pluralism and Indigenous Legal Traditions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Indigenous; Political science; Absoluteness; Environmental ethics; Pluralism (philosophy); Legal profession; Legal realism; Law; Legal research; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Ecology","score_opus":0.03797286410008306,"score_gpt":0.23912421213214977,"score_spread":0.2011513480320667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093336479","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07202896,0.015633581,0.0021389436,0.016668504,0.00020804557,0.000023671128,0.000014311443,0.000018855771,0.8932651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9483676,0.0048029833,0.0010367669,0.0011063119,0.00021433963,0.000021940987,0.000016822802,0.0000117145655,0.044421628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977952,0.0009981144,0.000054107342,0.00019378729,0.0007241789,0.00023466964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985575,0.00074912305,0.00013015732,0.00013487076,0.00022788772,0.00020053623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023583982,0.00014135957,0.00028230442,0.0013554179,0.006015599,0.0048123826,0.00078354887,0.001330972,0.0045784474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024197982,0.00013243817,0.00015299152,0.0013711349,0.022871258,0.0029645972,0.004397133,0.0029331327,0.00021620572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014928004,0.000010860576,0.00016717025,0.00003196317,0.0000013870589,0.00010052811,0.03447727,0.00005773774,0.00006410121,0.9581526,0.0012027303,0.0057321624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009853634,0.00003504305,0.0023883965,0.00072406884,0.0000075133125,0.00036243655,0.03676145,0.0005489141,0.00013295862,0.6367719,0.32224223,0.000015169421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014088323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020686856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014088323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051476145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042336374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037348807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095557111","doi":"","title":"Judicial Reasoning Across Legal Orders: Lessons from Nunavut","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Political science; Deference; Normative; Sociology","score_opus":0.029584218599484388,"score_gpt":0.33985298848898554,"score_spread":0.31026876988950114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095557111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29847175,0.023727255,0.011104058,0.08470576,0.0010465202,0.0002186026,0.00018531852,0.00009370936,0.580447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9602384,0.004732883,0.004583743,0.0050324863,0.0001241681,0.0000570425,0.000052824864,0.00005252346,0.025125878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939719,0.002484678,0.00016366846,0.00074667524,0.001029219,0.0016039243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915229,0.0051508127,0.00024458597,0.00034629498,0.0020610304,0.000674375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007623305,0.00060064316,0.0006273665,0.0020044167,0.03649869,0.013364721,0.0040115085,0.0046420684,0.0034540028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0155679425,0.0006246298,0.00066942925,0.002221679,0.028539393,0.006756058,0.006730378,0.006136867,0.00028607325],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000613951,0.000038724134,0.0063626915,0.00012282726,0.00003093744,0.0019075471,0.23226944,0.0017049876,0.00030706933,0.726758,0.00847614,0.021960147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092285285,0.000050522896,0.013330541,0.001481237,0.00010449865,0.0006967763,0.43300754,0.004998446,0.0013781298,0.22263691,0.32195315,0.00027000284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9737092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98634326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09434288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09434288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.080936536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6845087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097946713","doi":"10.1130/abs/2020am-357323","title":"IAPETUS SHRUGGED: THE EARLY RIFTING RECORD OF LAURENTIA IN THE NEW ENGLAND AND QUÉBEC APPALACHIANS","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Laurentia; Rift; Geology; Paleontology; Astronomy; Physics; Paleozoic","score_opus":0.029127508267977834,"score_gpt":0.26761388078771314,"score_spread":0.2384863725197353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097946713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98471314,0.0010643585,0.0001372255,0.00020238185,0.000012846991,0.000031762724,0.00085286965,0.00001304476,0.012972454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952938,0.00029636914,0.00017050678,0.000070419286,0.000006276313,0.000018279201,0.00033861562,0.00000471465,0.003800974],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997904,0.000022047803,0.000009306558,0.00004215056,0.000035215187,0.00010097055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914885,0.00009451363,0.00020364678,0.000027188065,0.00036407803,0.00016165468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029906156,0.0002011142,0.00024711387,0.0021099176,0.0038480617,0.0009833168,0.0008341729,0.00037348896,0.004456534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083685305,0.00014973414,0.00012844383,0.0023592825,0.0014494405,0.00054370257,0.00083975634,0.0005040212,0.00037586974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020959576,0.000043280754,0.89324915,0.00024938988,0.000071326736,0.0020590264,0.043679114,0.00047105245,0.0044088583,0.0013557845,0.004428721,0.049774732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020694708,0.00001217124,0.98508924,0.000067847344,0.000008385795,0.00018453007,0.006718637,0.00011759933,0.0001142477,0.000033662964,0.007642205,0.000009433403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97535706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99502206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024642944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008461459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004663396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061392486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3098060769","doi":"10.71781/2025","title":"Le projet d’un tribunal unifié de la famille au Québec ou l’impasse d’une voie d’accès à la justice","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Physics; Tribunal; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.008553796887687669,"score_gpt":0.22037029977865064,"score_spread":0.21181650289096296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3098060769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13407135,0.011344737,0.0090534175,0.14688967,0.003881671,0.0004919531,0.0019688616,0.00029311527,0.6920052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.442834,0.0027569793,0.0034405708,0.016297508,0.00023214122,0.00015145348,0.0005993856,0.00009669645,0.5335912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968548,0.00050657,0.000053416738,0.00034704767,0.0008373237,0.0014008045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950578,0.00025526952,0.00014386325,0.00023676392,0.0023796547,0.0019265759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002546528,0.00043050642,0.00031157947,0.00080064114,0.016496405,0.005298559,0.0013323454,0.0028238022,0.032984383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044742296,0.00032326818,0.00040134403,0.00084762677,0.0035172577,0.0016207743,0.0035430086,0.0034817213,0.00187075],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010163264,0.00012180795,0.020823864,0.00022808823,0.000058563655,0.0010492498,0.026207048,0.0006072888,0.0018228971,0.4534016,0.3754131,0.120164834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022143093,0.000044050365,0.029043289,0.0003274056,0.000025529382,0.0001527974,0.010024016,0.00042183706,0.00036620928,0.0042176684,0.95530415,0.000050860795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97894055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9904158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06318022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06318022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14175306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45840675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3100860369","doi":"","title":"Chagnon v. Syndicat de la fonction publique et parapublique du Québec: Implications of the Supreme Court of Canada’s Decision for the Law of Parliamentary Privilege","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Privilege (computing)","score_opus":0.027243929199189033,"score_gpt":0.2941517510665078,"score_spread":0.26690782186731876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3100860369","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050784584,0.24583328,0.0011286023,0.48751092,0.009336337,0.0005105205,0.0064890054,0.000099375975,0.19830738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49055263,0.0784725,0.0030531096,0.2999472,0.0021911424,0.000477356,0.0015115927,0.00012163218,0.12367284],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98818725,0.0017216948,0.0007600724,0.0008405359,0.005621367,0.0028690742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9660245,0.01369914,0.0012355552,0.0004805169,0.016005574,0.0025546593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012903997,0.0007075965,0.0011360894,0.0060927607,0.017608497,0.006850471,0.0043484494,0.011746543,0.0060131955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034666695,0.0010520988,0.0013970329,0.0076715387,0.004426772,0.0020584536,0.0014655489,0.009518061,0.00036553654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032912788,0.000062078485,0.01095179,0.0018888991,0.0003310592,0.0006734974,0.006391468,0.00090872694,0.00077537267,0.1823189,0.74603397,0.049335167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000498943,0.000078162666,0.0851429,0.005663489,0.0012747074,0.00018003963,0.005792321,0.0009755014,0.0013822666,0.010826259,0.8878456,0.00033991158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99719536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8652891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13471092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35354754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9774007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108883279","doi":"10.5204/thesis.eprints.206179","title":"Gladue, Bugmy and ‘special treatment': Reconciling a proposal for sentencing law reform in Queensland with s.10 of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Queensland University of Technology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Statutory law; Law; Legislature; Political science; State (computer science); High Court; Law reform; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.015391589506519402,"score_gpt":0.2593765323218664,"score_spread":0.24398494281534702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108883279","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16572602,0.005845196,0.0030602554,0.61540926,0.0018044299,0.00020376121,0.00007894071,0.00005067405,0.20782144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8047163,0.0020571055,0.00283554,0.088318266,0.0005165636,0.00023860512,0.000036242836,0.000027445069,0.10125398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99375397,0.0029410233,0.00010824482,0.0003856898,0.0010235438,0.0017875793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983734,0.0007288011,0.00016138199,0.000070369446,0.00032950385,0.00033648917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065813237,0.00021257215,0.00028911786,0.00075738644,0.00979694,0.0059575094,0.0020452335,0.006813883,0.0039802394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010125578,0.00030924156,0.0004611645,0.00059557136,0.011311284,0.0030487669,0.003916042,0.0067954073,0.00036710067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060277955,0.00007691375,0.001890325,0.00008836835,0.000011579671,0.00055101747,0.05462039,0.00063903845,0.00044640334,0.8465607,0.07082153,0.024233548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027084586,0.00037944238,0.035020523,0.0011516779,0.000114853385,0.00041958288,0.09314668,0.0019595502,0.0009035616,0.23435862,0.63211167,0.00016305318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27639434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44122738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27639434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018877245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03967258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5495711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110958855","doi":"10.18572/1812-3767-2020-11-67-72","title":"Interpretation of Equality of Rights in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Practice of the Canadian Supreme Court","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional and municipal law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Human rights; Fundamental rights; Political science; Dignity; International human rights law; Linguistic rights; Bill of rights; Politics; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.03292663684936916,"score_gpt":0.2989053444139983,"score_spread":0.26597870756462916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110958855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010213502,0.013729208,0.027680943,0.1261168,0.0024901698,0.00016698138,0.0007519686,0.00012908997,0.8187215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8094924,0.011108881,0.03605348,0.035898395,0.0012480477,0.00028972144,0.00045384746,0.00021788031,0.105237424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827194,0.0043492317,0.00056721776,0.0016651263,0.007600764,0.003098167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908331,0.0032067492,0.0004084476,0.00038779617,0.0044347416,0.0007291893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011852881,0.00064029073,0.00079283107,0.004950708,0.023690075,0.018724246,0.0035052234,0.0075249155,0.006165663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019289915,0.0006099217,0.0007745074,0.0057152426,0.048768863,0.0047185393,0.0040416596,0.008424864,0.00044269423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021138762,0.0000013634747,0.00006170428,0.000010426509,0.0000014439256,0.000034492954,0.0019374958,0.00008421324,0.000025974568,0.98967767,0.0064037596,0.0017592915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025818015,0.000011282241,0.0022469822,0.00050673384,0.000028581724,0.000095273506,0.0054111183,0.00129293,0.00023805672,0.5896,0.40040335,0.00013981093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97103006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9794326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12506466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12506466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20026034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9074118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111094914","doi":"10.3138/tjt-2020-0088","title":"Interesting Times, Indeed: Reflections on the Last Decade at the Toronto School of Theology","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Theology; Sociology; Energy (signal processing); Commodification; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.06049127111923068,"score_gpt":0.3615885889714969,"score_spread":0.30109731785226623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111094914","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01743356,0.0308888,0.0002416641,0.90751535,0.0141998315,0.000016605394,0.00019014507,0.000026474627,0.02948757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53589904,0.03218722,0.00046171894,0.2929391,0.010550144,0.000083928324,0.00020787175,0.0002704318,0.12740053],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98602444,0.005292405,0.00031239557,0.0009774943,0.0029507023,0.004442495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774948,0.004556957,0.0015846607,0.0005634985,0.0034964138,0.012303716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01128891,0.0005808245,0.00065979006,0.0012874018,0.05197293,0.020563079,0.002969513,0.014912294,0.015358524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015756436,0.0009769831,0.00058952504,0.0041550715,0.042697866,0.009671573,0.011715133,0.028873783,0.0018421637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057330923,0.000024952187,0.0015045785,0.0002520036,0.0000145054155,0.0009134895,0.2757353,0.000102354315,0.00030635088,0.07772979,0.6340222,0.009337136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055212777,0.000008251414,0.0027105154,0.0002995084,0.0000056845806,0.000104380146,0.16142088,0.000019424631,0.000082165934,0.0015098819,0.8337944,0.0000394631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78282076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9000889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8752914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.124708585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062194623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90482837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111302684","doi":"10.7202/1074026ar","title":"Jonathan Crowe, \"Natural Law and the Nature of Law.\"","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural law; Philosophy; Law; Natural (archaeology); Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.056749497704937965,"score_gpt":0.34822185029109004,"score_spread":0.29147235258615206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111302684","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011542808,0.9023022,0.00036439698,0.086946465,0.0051002726,0.000014000972,0.00011831537,0.000022825127,0.005016151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0070893182,0.9043818,0.00086287194,0.07003421,0.0071546095,0.00009412731,0.00017381216,0.000040177452,0.010169051],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963737,0.0012757656,0.00032295065,0.00026944757,0.0015657892,0.00019225448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98863727,0.00760749,0.00061933714,0.0002311153,0.002503994,0.0004008196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047725877,0.0011474682,0.0011331253,0.0047013634,0.0022621998,0.0048846337,0.0028175307,0.0058022873,0.005989237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019208195,0.0007370987,0.00076956867,0.006914285,0.004632527,0.010141774,0.0022231815,0.005505999,0.0030654082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030386294,0.000018142286,0.00030241528,0.0022485836,0.00003905448,0.00007539515,0.0010119423,0.000081173974,0.00006850838,0.03188186,0.9329615,0.03128104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031638414,0.000012682713,0.00215999,0.004626309,0.000049059483,0.00013197628,0.0011157562,0.00007441884,0.00018940064,0.050372705,0.9412073,0.000028814466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04158851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07504822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04158851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004643146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008954447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08269286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112291549","doi":"10.23865/arctic.v11.2431","title":"Sámi Law: A Methodological Approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arctic review on law and politics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Premise; Scope (computer science); Political science; Comparative law; Economic Justice; Commercial law; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2585948405630685,"score_gpt":0.4215881804262709,"score_spread":0.1629933398632024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112291549","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04432112,0.109198876,0.25794837,0.14057575,0.003398949,0.0034351158,0.0018014844,0.00016188862,0.43915844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6714528,0.059743915,0.21934174,0.013972312,0.0015723417,0.008181978,0.0006409885,0.00011778822,0.024976032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850729,0.011573823,0.0005278417,0.0009965637,0.0012670503,0.0005618085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881213,0.008527443,0.0008341682,0.0005559592,0.0014927534,0.00046828488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021749323,0.0008817263,0.0008865302,0.012309126,0.009360916,0.011103761,0.0032751458,0.0032586993,0.002999555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013158321,0.0005846973,0.00074614485,0.0135939745,0.032771636,0.007697868,0.0055033704,0.0047771735,0.0005753184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033648396,0.00001533173,0.00033276432,0.0002780103,0.0000056748777,0.000071202914,0.011730917,0.00012269709,0.00005930646,0.98078984,0.0016783183,0.004912582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020249767,0.000051300973,0.0014944891,0.0030599325,0.000034072968,0.00034233133,0.07204328,0.0014368058,0.0003973007,0.5887512,0.33233836,0.000030653373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03467216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04593336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03467216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026053898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027867796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18903512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115883702","doi":"10.3389/fhumd.2020.609694","title":"(In)Essential Bordering: Canada, COVID, and Mobility","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Human Dynamics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation; Australian Government; Government of Canada; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Subsidy; Political science; Politics; Closure (psychology); Norm (philosophy); Pandemic; Political economy; Development economics; Economic growth; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.01459642383533884,"score_gpt":0.27929791821798033,"score_spread":0.2647014943826415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115883702","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.246436,0.009103513,0.0021430994,0.116376676,0.0010416039,0.000059664788,0.0008016598,0.00004697631,0.62399083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95194924,0.002927574,0.00045295482,0.0032722002,0.00006561715,0.000015388297,0.000116468174,0.00002111257,0.041179538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989039,0.00009548109,0.000021818176,0.000103689614,0.00022269825,0.0006525191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916506,0.00010069553,0.00008212027,0.000026986829,0.0002207384,0.00040445884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059692306,0.00020606989,0.00019721154,0.0008271596,0.01986596,0.0074195564,0.00095567363,0.0014930037,0.011616902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020508098,0.00012099897,0.00021453336,0.0020936201,0.013911181,0.0022246353,0.0042829583,0.002376857,0.00027574063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039909868,0.000016228469,0.014497664,0.00008896899,0.000009052924,0.0005292622,0.088072665,0.00033970881,0.00019093884,0.81440216,0.048639886,0.033173583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016782971,0.000019938312,0.04693618,0.0006346389,0.000024431656,0.00044167365,0.21090904,0.0006265277,0.00028423298,0.047466572,0.6925569,0.00008316453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98825234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05135774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05135774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08944462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3726282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3116128873","doi":"10.7202/1072698ar","title":"\"The Ethical Teacher\" (Elizabeth Campbell)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.057990758295886395,"score_gpt":0.33842543024672667,"score_spread":0.28043467195084026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3116128873","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011660784,0.04203121,0.00074992946,0.81477445,0.07593076,0.000040962706,0.000021094684,0.000046359313,0.065239236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04164697,0.021999788,0.0011749582,0.54630244,0.025277684,0.00022624759,0.000021338612,0.00023022394,0.36312047],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99438924,0.002772314,0.00016365835,0.00068480073,0.0014122049,0.0005777555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99272037,0.0029794902,0.00039329886,0.00022572874,0.0013358707,0.0023453448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061395,0.0008492165,0.0007257575,0.0012926857,0.016456624,0.01127102,0.0016618416,0.009764755,0.010400075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014866099,0.00057090225,0.00026140656,0.0011369458,0.013514344,0.008885735,0.007454608,0.021005245,0.004220216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062000818,0.000013578227,0.000091947855,0.00005634248,0.0000016978004,0.00010240243,0.006095504,0.000013005134,0.000052875384,0.09371055,0.89157355,0.008282318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003559664,0.000005409897,0.00016345679,0.00018078787,0.0000014215435,0.00018697442,0.0067480346,0.000017119353,0.000041099513,0.0105887735,0.98205537,0.000007943582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023082564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059956342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023082564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005437604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01288933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04589641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120503199","doi":"","title":"The Story of Law Reform in Nova Scotia: A Perilous Enterprise","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Law; Law reform; Political science; Legal history; Nova (rocket); History; Engineering; Archaeology; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.027843084213617003,"score_gpt":0.3111120622201974,"score_spread":0.28326897800658035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120503199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37264174,0.0072019957,0.00040154805,0.36429983,0.00097456394,0.000062734645,0.00019370542,0.000028552335,0.25419536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93152636,0.0017268567,0.00013234682,0.02411844,0.00016820835,0.000024588138,0.000056210236,0.00001721212,0.04222975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973437,0.00054252794,0.00003839422,0.00013951804,0.00032991765,0.0016058774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973688,0.00065885554,0.00027916676,0.00015434,0.0004151765,0.0011236503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012881744,0.0001812815,0.00028716493,0.00076334504,0.020973397,0.009086922,0.0011936238,0.004371139,0.0027331507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041759494,0.00028487432,0.00026757107,0.0013170149,0.01635084,0.0018616591,0.0051496904,0.0070729484,0.00037004246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022001809,0.00015730687,0.02407737,0.00019237888,0.000043066622,0.015356263,0.24934371,0.0011551068,0.0014595124,0.55325395,0.12704927,0.027692137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006688759,0.00007021575,0.065791,0.0005378053,0.000042270047,0.001212719,0.2024815,0.0005766915,0.00057051453,0.024075698,0.7044905,0.00008417063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8695375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91300625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13046253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049718175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03960783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36073226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121131019","doi":"","title":"Kahkewistahaw First Nation v. Taypotat: An Arbitrary Approach to Discrimination","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unanimity; Constitutionality; Arbitrariness; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Notice; Disadvantage; Context (archaeology); Prejudice (legal term); Charter; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.11209152580254468,"score_gpt":0.32970343146166536,"score_spread":0.2176119056591207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121131019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21202138,0.004005971,0.008789261,0.20464312,0.002357675,0.0003450747,0.0007875123,0.00015510629,0.5668948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8349525,0.00095174165,0.0036627757,0.08712434,0.0002576523,0.00014244743,0.0001286006,0.00006233117,0.07271763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885041,0.0011328137,0.0004374898,0.0012004196,0.004150601,0.0045745396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930058,0.0029651113,0.00031124565,0.00034315867,0.0023053319,0.0010693984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005761842,0.00035021163,0.0006382406,0.0016715553,0.027347237,0.010207509,0.003538382,0.012181131,0.0034024282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012134474,0.000714026,0.0008812908,0.0018656648,0.015279591,0.0027731194,0.0040497966,0.016715484,0.0004472498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043573356,0.000029936706,0.0027670246,0.000046469577,0.000020289364,0.00078540616,0.010313583,0.00021026828,0.00082687975,0.94227946,0.03575655,0.006920455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021726795,0.00013417454,0.032139577,0.0006826414,0.00026689874,0.001369547,0.027602231,0.0037152232,0.0056877695,0.27633587,0.65117764,0.00067112606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8916906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9634759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10830939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039552536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.087751545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2869751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121192050","doi":"","title":"Judging the Limits of Cooperative Federalism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Adjudication; Appeal; Metaphor; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Law; Separation of powers; Commerce Clause; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Context (archaeology); Judicial review; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09536380529066056,"score_gpt":0.3499702702630056,"score_spread":0.254606464972345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121192050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1371068,0.0055222097,0.02008917,0.065755814,0.00054833933,0.00014187842,0.00019907358,0.000076783675,0.7705599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888735,0.0006114766,0.0021628877,0.0040862723,0.00014329112,0.00009047287,0.00004042421,0.000024436633,0.00396707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9750743,0.007900866,0.0010376973,0.0025217256,0.00926657,0.004198852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9437304,0.03635689,0.0022277844,0.0031048558,0.012072324,0.0025078165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027704006,0.00029313323,0.0008403591,0.0039091767,0.013711527,0.010475376,0.002678032,0.0061324774,0.0037588086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07931246,0.0004235786,0.0005198058,0.0020569877,0.038925387,0.009524752,0.0062545785,0.0077002696,0.0003414205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011176141,0.0000046204177,0.00088657305,0.000021836937,0.000005877691,0.00007604009,0.0025795666,0.00015738393,0.000093528586,0.99100304,0.0022508309,0.0029094878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004524487,0.000026854186,0.0059185377,0.00047423877,0.000037592537,0.00012811305,0.011347732,0.0013665581,0.0005112266,0.879513,0.10057535,0.00005560057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3750116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4775226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62498844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02554275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03366061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74565756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121224161","doi":"","title":"Context and Inclusivity in Canada's Evolving Definition of the Family","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Charter; Commission; Context (archaeology); Legislature; Inclusion (mineral); Interdependence; Political science; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.04251854708595245,"score_gpt":0.25591828164135877,"score_spread":0.2133997345554063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121224161","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29608825,0.03388431,0.0038186891,0.36435342,0.0022643614,0.00013231824,0.00081993616,0.00006900306,0.2985697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95651436,0.0065965154,0.00166429,0.019762738,0.0001540523,0.00003516779,0.00011384763,0.000043296248,0.01511577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901148,0.0018600138,0.00033304445,0.0011429624,0.003077502,0.0034715713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98881954,0.0020368705,0.00052263465,0.00027672047,0.004005521,0.0043385965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063521806,0.00025712678,0.0005248472,0.002281432,0.040899478,0.011852863,0.0031992747,0.0027547902,0.004322783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010721878,0.00032360211,0.00041112694,0.004813285,0.028434077,0.0033729125,0.0061481595,0.0072653703,0.00013060568],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053675423,0.000029869685,0.01270272,0.00012655735,0.000017906394,0.0010856355,0.122413605,0.0005380845,0.00039792707,0.7886671,0.034696307,0.039270643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028450664,0.000035049292,0.058981225,0.0011287937,0.000041527936,0.0006474724,0.19745345,0.0008476698,0.0002486205,0.054604575,0.6857688,0.00021431241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99690187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27005947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27005947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35421336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8466276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121300722","doi":"","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL AND COMMON LAW DIALOGUES BETWEEN THE SUPREME COURT AND CANADIAN LEGISLATURE","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Legislature; Political science; Statutory interpretation; Common law; Constitution; Separation of powers; Sociology","score_opus":0.0629178601273308,"score_gpt":0.3049347126187453,"score_spread":0.24201685249141447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121300722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04284261,0.01778566,0.0105816815,0.13362084,0.0011661164,0.00012755353,0.00028947208,0.00012899483,0.7934571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9192016,0.0041014072,0.004994948,0.0094514815,0.0003154921,0.0000826378,0.0001133644,0.000048383754,0.061690792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800514,0.0072492575,0.00041247037,0.0017044791,0.006675171,0.003907326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98844236,0.0066752783,0.0005637216,0.00057868945,0.0024773395,0.0012626952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011420126,0.00046736235,0.00048532904,0.003218535,0.03533587,0.01777825,0.002234,0.0058565647,0.006978835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024260763,0.0006080556,0.0005332901,0.0039560273,0.042894688,0.0063819434,0.004083768,0.007452738,0.00040860908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070234732,0.000005321077,0.00023319604,0.000021935894,0.000003855224,0.00009625669,0.015208904,0.00019156208,0.00010019933,0.9666341,0.0095434785,0.007954196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025957024,0.000019950798,0.0059414804,0.00042361254,0.000039668805,0.00013890475,0.03163824,0.0011704335,0.0005189509,0.29656664,0.6633678,0.00014840314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95309925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97435343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14236744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14236744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16823469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121301256","doi":"","title":"Judicial Audiences: A Case Study of Justice David Watt's Literary Judgments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Harm; Political science; Law; Appeal; Arbitrariness; Empathy; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; History","score_opus":0.023101691563452702,"score_gpt":0.32377025546612853,"score_spread":0.3006685639026758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121301256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.835089,0.0019362192,0.0018293062,0.019013496,0.0007751257,0.00024591864,0.000048809256,0.0000421031,0.14101997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719981,0.00089959655,0.0010560823,0.0040046023,0.0004634808,0.00010899573,0.000031084877,0.000071188944,0.02136672],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97956526,0.0116895065,0.00061250554,0.0015111448,0.003536022,0.0030855709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784297,0.015450589,0.0014829128,0.00054298935,0.0017931974,0.0023006608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010503845,0.001050566,0.001155996,0.003998145,0.0629183,0.017690567,0.0032154801,0.010156744,0.0046294457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035468742,0.0009134871,0.00085485773,0.0036942866,0.019270632,0.004926331,0.011321752,0.011830306,0.0006972838],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000387086,0.00011294293,0.0020270206,0.00008151841,0.0000087476465,0.023388596,0.93301934,0.00008732515,0.00081253826,0.02692645,0.0069320793,0.006564729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017738654,0.000086599626,0.0027478372,0.00027047793,0.000022454682,0.004043071,0.87252635,0.00033671537,0.00083028787,0.003246102,0.115817465,0.000054822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044149794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12178458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0629183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016592165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006848537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12038517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121308364","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1034","title":"Breaking the Law's Grip On Equality: A New Paradigm For Section 15","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unanimity; Interpretation (philosophy); Section (typography); Law; Supreme court; Tacking; Political science; Trilogy; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.10673640855730362,"score_gpt":0.3740450030483598,"score_spread":0.26730859449105615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121308364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053090066,0.010844852,0.1529991,0.18935302,0.0020974255,0.00013120622,0.0001663232,0.00011411207,0.591204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92858,0.0025896558,0.025616713,0.02236816,0.0015894319,0.00023779282,0.000053226253,0.0001062266,0.018858746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861588,0.007296965,0.00042723375,0.0018842503,0.0026882438,0.0015445326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925668,0.0040969905,0.0007292041,0.0010954754,0.00094784336,0.0005636577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012412037,0.0006063068,0.0010137294,0.0021820704,0.010571616,0.015687987,0.00368694,0.009760745,0.004346709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00987826,0.00067905773,0.0013602608,0.0013310671,0.08039054,0.020841027,0.01089987,0.016086845,0.00051006995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018644569,0.000001995804,0.000030089977,0.0000047790763,7.895413e-7,0.000008796239,0.0006926654,0.00005335313,0.000018833456,0.9983329,0.00024956188,0.0006043048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008244807,0.0000142932695,0.00011829286,0.00009425185,0.0000051305874,0.00002469255,0.00077038194,0.00030052636,0.00010058159,0.9680766,0.030474357,0.000012712551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014692751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01385904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015687987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0143730445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017426925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10428423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121313813","doi":"","title":"Willis, ‘Theology,’ and the Rule of Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Law; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Constitutional law; Political science; Democracy; Legal realism; Separation of powers; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.0213215182514069,"score_gpt":0.25599865110096276,"score_spread":0.23467713284955585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121313813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019972585,0.07131429,0.013088044,0.27092212,0.0021444398,0.000059920905,0.00017143357,0.000087857064,0.62223935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85367817,0.01911452,0.005252834,0.02042308,0.001693155,0.000116965595,0.00010119633,0.00008875577,0.09953128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945496,0.0020976395,0.0001559426,0.00063676963,0.0014341486,0.0011259547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730444,0.0014525651,0.0002898693,0.00024100253,0.00043008785,0.00028199356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004838528,0.00060521014,0.0004949803,0.002923832,0.010807635,0.012488863,0.0017843158,0.0049540657,0.003363956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007385333,0.00041610518,0.00041365193,0.0027956592,0.097856075,0.008225013,0.0036063194,0.0053489665,0.0005111105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017078685,0.000001481164,0.000038776972,0.000008485269,6.3328633e-7,0.000017909382,0.0022516365,0.000042915613,0.000008539562,0.99271727,0.0035613906,0.0013491671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008394449,0.0000047267117,0.00035117718,0.00011089833,0.000002508428,0.00004951735,0.0027136756,0.00016038101,0.000059764712,0.6714712,0.3250528,0.00001496528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48494682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4063167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48494682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035363194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032586243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96424824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121353673","doi":"","title":"Producing Paternity: The Role of Legal Fatherhood in Maintaining the Traditional Family","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Jurisprudence; Law; Openness to experience; Legislature; Sociology; Legal history; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03334374926196655,"score_gpt":0.24689127943848624,"score_spread":0.21354753017651967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121353673","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3027378,0.01298119,0.027798211,0.033257667,0.00032781606,0.000034646426,0.000042452477,0.000051508192,0.62276864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861202,0.0020813413,0.0019480009,0.0007662802,0.000052931755,0.0000067561464,0.000006763224,0.0000108744525,0.009006863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739933,0.0011128813,0.000051226918,0.0002606549,0.0006933015,0.0004826298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981464,0.00081922015,0.00030208396,0.00018068198,0.00032979983,0.00022178065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042757597,0.00015524149,0.00022168677,0.00093107205,0.011893898,0.0046631168,0.0013356679,0.0013042476,0.0018030213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005832488,0.00017305734,0.000118139804,0.0007456455,0.05232867,0.0045578056,0.003585258,0.0019439713,0.00015149079],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034973532,0.0000045956854,0.001784158,0.000015945345,0.0000011293637,0.00023109152,0.065710716,0.000068040245,0.00013733855,0.9189523,0.00070320925,0.012387926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011918489,0.000068685404,0.022159232,0.0007884571,0.00002445058,0.00205243,0.14166984,0.00073883566,0.0011623095,0.37467736,0.45657977,0.00006666106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23183076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37718695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23183076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010173911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016156828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4609627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121420720","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1160","title":"Ignoring the Golden Principle of Charter Interpretation?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Certiorari; Political science; Judicial interpretation; Sociology; Original jurisdiction; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05787098581992551,"score_gpt":0.348874749366013,"score_spread":0.2910037635460875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121420720","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04231943,0.02826878,0.06612852,0.6273337,0.0057622897,0.00014063383,0.00011030941,0.00019351044,0.22974278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8447367,0.010552261,0.018051302,0.10248052,0.004842638,0.0002294148,0.000053076346,0.00019642603,0.018857637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9610268,0.019987788,0.0015694876,0.00418646,0.010499932,0.002729459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96560794,0.023388166,0.0029961984,0.003005958,0.0045054187,0.0004963055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04607444,0.00034407488,0.0011921682,0.002065245,0.0045466167,0.009967902,0.0028406316,0.0076195365,0.0018932185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07080782,0.0005636917,0.00090907456,0.0013671018,0.0433106,0.014526211,0.004133715,0.0118153645,0.0004974932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061457436,0.000003287215,0.00018799672,0.000034543296,0.000004392215,0.000043466513,0.0021376132,0.00008945694,0.000045453446,0.9844057,0.00429208,0.008749874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021390979,0.000025071966,0.00040620827,0.00034867518,0.000012900551,0.0001554799,0.002116868,0.00043758008,0.00040387438,0.8848982,0.11114283,0.000030967778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015100735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013089313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04607444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009701735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01381397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24366784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121432486","doi":"","title":"When Disciplines Collide: Polygamy and the Social Sciences on Trial","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Deference; Law; Legislator; Adversarial system; Law and economics; Sociology; Legislation","score_opus":0.0591703081088708,"score_gpt":0.36972988721145095,"score_spread":0.31055957910258014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121432486","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029159792,0.026404653,0.0068841563,0.6880469,0.0033103453,0.00012514828,0.000059496895,0.000047337806,0.2459622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76678044,0.010454863,0.003945161,0.18144122,0.0040913695,0.0004597879,0.00005206436,0.000116076546,0.032658886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9017081,0.06456146,0.0023040888,0.006316248,0.015261848,0.009848229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8943548,0.08992599,0.0030581064,0.0033511347,0.005106962,0.004202992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.077771485,0.0004697154,0.0013793587,0.003151971,0.02486801,0.03650662,0.003589057,0.024614187,0.007574122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13147199,0.00059447257,0.00072897,0.002483941,0.08876057,0.021216055,0.021569733,0.022529684,0.000958636],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003793379,0.000017157474,0.0008079466,0.000060450202,0.000015316511,0.0003273331,0.011845693,0.00013034922,0.000058073932,0.9596477,0.013222957,0.013829156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007575306,0.000046292877,0.0014864538,0.0010164576,0.000028190712,0.0001465509,0.019212719,0.00039206268,0.00018461871,0.83229905,0.14504278,0.00006898309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063419074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09270196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077771485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023072783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044151105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41129982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121472864","doi":"","title":"Insite: Site and Sight (Part 1 - Insights on Insite)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Citizenship; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.03799854464079478,"score_gpt":0.27037443164962316,"score_spread":0.23237588700882839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121472864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038237073,0.0011448122,0.0010732036,0.027378414,0.00028013793,0.000027339169,0.00009557892,0.000026430118,0.931737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7353117,0.0014223894,0.0009103943,0.016595632,0.00019837136,0.0000848934,0.00013729189,0.000102945894,0.2452364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979697,0.00045485623,0.000024278079,0.00018398196,0.00043860727,0.0009285967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904555,0.00037427794,0.000063325984,0.000059738384,0.00022432543,0.00023267698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00110202,0.00030651444,0.00037918388,0.0011006293,0.025900925,0.011736705,0.0017707624,0.006806877,0.0176635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020698828,0.0002641691,0.0005439599,0.0014669235,0.018871188,0.006269626,0.005883523,0.009431425,0.0014783125],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009500587,0.00002977345,0.001133476,0.00003065827,0.0000019525746,0.00078171544,0.026297899,0.00006582814,0.00009742974,0.9429016,0.02483376,0.0038163825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010482245,0.0000199086,0.0025361073,0.0003035404,0.000008650636,0.0008194235,0.15349174,0.00024990574,0.00028321354,0.08877629,0.7534683,0.000032569165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42195064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6670116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57804936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016695376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016762188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83898926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121498883","doi":"","title":"Reflecting Culture: Polygamy and the Charter","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Charter; Politics; Sociology; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Dignity; Constitutionality","score_opus":0.08995414543215899,"score_gpt":0.3667065384014886,"score_spread":0.27675239296932963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121498883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.100310855,0.037389457,0.0030246777,0.30280143,0.0024429336,0.000070265654,0.00009265961,0.000025962492,0.55384177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9244491,0.011842237,0.0006374814,0.029977687,0.00046386142,0.000046953814,0.00003020807,0.00002686705,0.032525573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99078584,0.004646809,0.00015826881,0.00049733464,0.0024515926,0.0014601245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99592614,0.0022629942,0.0003148239,0.00025389163,0.00082410156,0.00041803461],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074059544,0.00023543328,0.00028002565,0.0011878959,0.013862879,0.011263095,0.0012805802,0.0033517422,0.0026295858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009937638,0.00025319934,0.00018231463,0.0018161166,0.04240775,0.005614928,0.0043331576,0.0074781952,0.00021756269],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035623511,0.000007581953,0.00049143384,0.000025105623,0.0000021929036,0.0001251103,0.018496962,0.000056429828,0.000045042758,0.9533953,0.016437223,0.0109139485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024057086,0.000040233823,0.0073696235,0.00075452914,0.000018531711,0.00028542257,0.08245754,0.0002583166,0.00035623525,0.251014,0.65735227,0.000069318674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56935805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64114517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43064195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01539747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027460163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86635613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121572801","doi":"","title":"Les sources des droits ancestraux des peuples autochtones","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03975376797065606,"score_gpt":0.3184205612378662,"score_spread":0.27866679326721017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121572801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.721628,0.0031966758,0.0038214398,0.0030136914,0.000082312734,0.00005816731,0.0016027406,0.000027807226,0.26656914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9264913,0.0018483114,0.0011136575,0.00035189153,0.000043267715,0.000037279577,0.0005707647,0.000023719063,0.06951978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988863,0.00016561916,0.000040623778,0.00020421631,0.00046487394,0.00023840653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836034,0.0005216556,0.00028784308,0.0001669141,0.0005246655,0.00013862655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009802763,0.00018669353,0.00030521446,0.0019014213,0.0043049436,0.00289153,0.00045733014,0.0004608336,0.008758758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030756316,0.0001653192,0.00015229144,0.002618519,0.0022793727,0.0006154044,0.0013712026,0.0011813539,0.00048631174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090928006,0.000035287445,0.11326258,0.00021059172,0.00010415994,0.0024022078,0.08458316,0.000665233,0.0018841394,0.69596696,0.0059682056,0.09482665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027274406,0.000053342414,0.4148941,0.00072310655,0.00012697096,0.0016945015,0.03717278,0.0007332239,0.0029109141,0.049383074,0.49218684,0.00009382049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3036713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61178505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6963287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006721248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076612006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60380745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121577596","doi":"","title":"Women and (Their) Children: Wrongs, Rights and Relationships","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Compromise; Law; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.019823033636860353,"score_gpt":0.2735317924037172,"score_spread":0.2537087587668569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121577596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22552453,0.040498275,0.0029669472,0.13720556,0.0006437162,0.00004527194,0.00012146728,0.000026758706,0.5929675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96966344,0.006529753,0.00043135555,0.0063633444,0.000095813695,0.000020576721,0.000018006825,0.000014254112,0.016863557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950177,0.002624763,0.00009913992,0.00032976715,0.0009685374,0.00096018665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982999,0.0009372177,0.00025985725,0.000106149135,0.00013727813,0.00025948678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044058715,0.00034002503,0.00049232965,0.0009397585,0.011529813,0.009054626,0.00081700855,0.0036740743,0.004146009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056925206,0.0002512002,0.0002072575,0.0010187426,0.06718286,0.005778419,0.006166467,0.004133927,0.0003373782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009030226,0.00001277441,0.0014913968,0.000032422384,0.0000048863026,0.00039175962,0.2603856,0.00005760336,0.00009987349,0.7235873,0.004067359,0.009860075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021528629,0.000035453166,0.003422793,0.0006928807,0.000014646791,0.00091640675,0.29508463,0.00006780143,0.0002759833,0.21077569,0.4886499,0.000042249812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1351472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1269417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1351472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0103981625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009176748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26872116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121649698","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1212","title":"\"The question calls for an answer, and I propose to answer it\": The Patriation Reference as Constitutional Method","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Jurisprudence; Law; Context (archaeology); Convention; Political science; Constitutional law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.1268063496359986,"score_gpt":0.4228136742720102,"score_spread":0.29600732463601165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121649698","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021480534,0.0038087596,0.0052217464,0.9567979,0.003954797,0.000024446937,0.0000657711,0.00004567102,0.02793293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20149615,0.009412656,0.012813906,0.7092366,0.009063507,0.00026954504,0.00013660478,0.00017229951,0.05739872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949734,0.0021776631,0.00015809391,0.0008510396,0.0011164878,0.00072332745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910484,0.004273093,0.0006942638,0.0004662651,0.002883301,0.00063465955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011017301,0.00054088683,0.00067784736,0.001036412,0.009303466,0.008077568,0.0034875781,0.011858942,0.008655479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024279721,0.00022740214,0.0006516985,0.0016970952,0.035574503,0.012032867,0.004362262,0.015120159,0.0024857516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009686496,0.0000073941164,0.00028330533,0.00005482397,0.0000044117483,0.00006266547,0.003350849,0.000054001186,0.00006657137,0.8934329,0.096369125,0.0063042934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024574989,0.000029389897,0.0011328028,0.0004381225,0.000014685177,0.00025759,0.017070387,0.0006018456,0.00030988306,0.4320938,0.5479536,0.000073298266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12409395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12107432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87590605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00791675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01908681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24674326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121649844","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3191","title":"Renewing Human Rights Law in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Assembly of First Nations","funders":"","keywords":"Backlash; Human rights; Legislature; Political science; Context (archaeology); Face (sociological concept); Law; Law reform; International human rights law; Sociology; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.043535590972998264,"score_gpt":0.3181844516267179,"score_spread":0.27464886065371963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121649844","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108103804,0.022005877,0.003125682,0.47588253,0.0046753557,0.00036333382,0.0006385312,0.00025419722,0.38495064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.676232,0.015310935,0.007013536,0.11901425,0.0006833361,0.00011199188,0.000365285,0.000113640686,0.18115497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898784,0.0008755766,0.0002154321,0.00070956146,0.0040932097,0.0042277495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848947,0.0018605815,0.00044020076,0.0004154166,0.006154726,0.0062345183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005873861,0.00032212006,0.0005082011,0.0024572287,0.028487667,0.0140123665,0.0026617872,0.006512489,0.007282287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012158607,0.0006014337,0.0006564413,0.0036445893,0.010887405,0.0033421447,0.0051717334,0.00807735,0.0004223776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000589288,0.00014723766,0.009724584,0.00031171966,0.000035539375,0.0014485442,0.016019171,0.0016748802,0.00085686985,0.68480897,0.194952,0.0899615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057859965,0.000045649984,0.01955754,0.00036978655,0.000044721288,0.00019144212,0.01122322,0.001703528,0.00046646182,0.027083032,0.9391135,0.00014333049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9978751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3077998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3077998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5962258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8028541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121691978","doi":"","title":"Conceptual Metaphors for an Unfinished Constitution","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Humanities; Elaboration; Narrative; Philosophy; Metaphor; Political science; Sociology; Law; Theology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07686921584781906,"score_gpt":0.31981230334428523,"score_spread":0.24294308749646618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121691978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06689058,0.009853923,0.058454268,0.04540693,0.0012082228,0.00009902773,0.00049769797,0.00023423473,0.81735504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616082,0.002143574,0.007706552,0.001479861,0.000112476766,0.00007501147,0.00013850721,0.00007795102,0.026657956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733955,0.0011935428,0.000055750144,0.0002104448,0.00072595116,0.0004747642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986247,0.0004920936,0.00013718496,0.00014461705,0.0004620641,0.00013947174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021233452,0.00081523083,0.00032939442,0.0029169049,0.008952019,0.007439822,0.0016432522,0.0017337797,0.008072833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033122497,0.0002866247,0.00039458898,0.0035311247,0.03842283,0.0047841137,0.002336217,0.0034926098,0.00054522103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028417094,0.0000015086707,0.000039973776,0.000014561551,8.962547e-7,0.00003543372,0.0073496667,0.000064815686,0.000072923736,0.99026686,0.0012180959,0.00093236327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026240108,0.000015800479,0.0010515309,0.0002676921,0.000017438006,0.00026696717,0.036733974,0.0011216801,0.00037371102,0.47610185,0.48397774,0.000045390974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44670752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48929217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44670752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03934883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02197336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88821477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121809235","doi":"","title":"Rights of Love: The State and Intimate Relationships in Canada and the United States","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; State (computer science); Construct (python library); Legislature; Political science; Corporate governance; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02106228883660999,"score_gpt":0.2366987364455083,"score_spread":0.2156364476088983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121809235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80819887,0.004555427,0.00032562768,0.02348047,0.000147184,0.000043025895,0.00031906524,0.000010302136,0.16291998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98830706,0.0011981464,0.00006514001,0.0009122227,0.000016009135,0.000014003449,0.000053384858,0.0000120175455,0.00942204],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947454,0.00091189594,0.000093806426,0.00027611735,0.0011860704,0.0027867856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882246,0.0027917381,0.00086437137,0.00029413312,0.0028253791,0.004999829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035106377,0.00022987068,0.00088335853,0.003263158,0.05360371,0.016243342,0.0023873535,0.0028208431,0.009508284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0132047795,0.0004310686,0.00045091976,0.0073491163,0.026614059,0.0065124063,0.009507871,0.007545166,0.00028959042],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017855287,0.00030040264,0.0926244,0.00005951891,0.000050911643,0.0005866115,0.6487637,0.0004454411,0.00021104442,0.20264336,0.014928759,0.039207328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001648794,0.000022409704,0.10249817,0.00024753538,0.000035224693,0.000116021045,0.8244641,0.00026495123,0.00013293304,0.008608441,0.06351397,0.00007973242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99471915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99824655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90957206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09042794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12452275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65610373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121870366","doi":"","title":"Protecting Children from Exposure to Domestic Violence: The Use and Abuse of Child Maltreatment Statutes","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Statutory law; Jurisdiction; Domestic violence; Juvenile court; Political science; Child abuse; Child protection; Criminology; Population; Law; Poison control; Psychology; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Juvenile delinquency; Environmental health","score_opus":0.02700128016482885,"score_gpt":0.28991874690504005,"score_spread":0.2629174667402112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121870366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2516076,0.17204285,0.008156564,0.17387742,0.0011373453,0.0001496059,0.00061164924,0.00012066943,0.39229625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9118145,0.061342683,0.0060263514,0.014032207,0.00038965582,0.000066880035,0.00020246141,0.000023440723,0.0061018234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900961,0.0033149435,0.00053973973,0.0004108562,0.004359398,0.0012789787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98022103,0.012922318,0.0025361872,0.00047749828,0.0032974323,0.0005455902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010877858,0.00022720579,0.00023135751,0.0047131856,0.004703184,0.0078007756,0.002035338,0.0023489436,0.0008175794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020822277,0.00045282405,0.00041747393,0.006512965,0.012481033,0.0033200998,0.0026791133,0.0044236863,0.00008040765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027108415,0.00004658135,0.0422564,0.00032620734,0.000021233347,0.00038860296,0.022910342,0.00091783016,0.00030084804,0.83789295,0.013199138,0.081712775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003065749,0.00022523009,0.23816825,0.008630457,0.00024993546,0.001091339,0.07306169,0.0031300283,0.0019197286,0.08884043,0.5844062,0.0002459794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52138996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7516965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52138996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02853174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03414907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96285737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121899565","doi":"","title":"M v. H: Time to Clean Up Your Acts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Lesbian; Legitimacy; Deference; Judicial deference; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.028958801284463567,"score_gpt":0.30289778322778094,"score_spread":0.2739389819433174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121899565","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016207404,0.0066335266,0.0061265137,0.53832155,0.01706915,0.00027324143,0.0002158722,0.0012106787,0.413942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1441308,0.00212793,0.005601646,0.4662055,0.0031580857,0.00027121042,0.00014585261,0.0007430538,0.3776159],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928604,0.0016583549,0.00028434163,0.00048624506,0.002302055,0.0024086584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99467975,0.0020734768,0.00040692423,0.0003826639,0.0010662489,0.0013908934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062194383,0.0004011369,0.000539733,0.00077308645,0.01635603,0.008317607,0.0014328341,0.011894606,0.023108847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020253021,0.0007182005,0.0005338849,0.00041592476,0.0067158956,0.0071926033,0.0050786007,0.02073299,0.014212448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003616162,0.00006891428,0.0010187387,0.000072856885,0.00000848466,0.0007770093,0.00993737,0.00007389391,0.00079798495,0.15148939,0.7698114,0.065907806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010833241,0.00003385067,0.0011957788,0.00017215102,0.000006056596,0.00014974408,0.005395362,0.000056000652,0.00052593305,0.011649898,0.9807693,0.000034992117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050104488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07949436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050104488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005846107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018045206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09962571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121974619","doi":"10.1017/s0731126500011525","title":"International Human Rights in Canada: At the Juncture of Law and Politics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Information","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; International human rights law; Law; International law; Treaty; Principle of legality; Politics","score_opus":0.013469752923166326,"score_gpt":0.2873841096292457,"score_spread":0.2739143567060794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121974619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09603458,0.01873934,0.0021159498,0.35284442,0.0010686059,0.000101542035,0.0007282652,0.00010347696,0.5282638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89725983,0.009109082,0.0016457905,0.021067608,0.00023158414,0.00003855898,0.00017139327,0.00007138047,0.07040473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934598,0.0005685474,0.00009370235,0.000508924,0.0023025929,0.0030663696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940586,0.0011078175,0.0002571192,0.00013592765,0.002238043,0.002202544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025934041,0.00029374365,0.00042468094,0.0027009093,0.03101914,0.016908215,0.0015748274,0.0031686965,0.010755159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072929845,0.00040732222,0.0003343232,0.005552673,0.015477765,0.003612227,0.0039101443,0.0054067457,0.00036042937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028107639,0.000025367142,0.005984069,0.000100943325,0.00001653151,0.0005009972,0.020870695,0.00048380648,0.00030653423,0.8468879,0.09118183,0.033613387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019786588,0.000017853867,0.030549584,0.00052852265,0.00004628901,0.00019220855,0.07196335,0.0012957583,0.0005314788,0.06537317,0.82930917,0.00017292428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9979274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99909294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26131076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26131076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32483903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8567748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121975356","doi":"","title":"Fake It Till You Make it: Policymaking and Assisted Human Reproduction in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Reimbursement; Legitimacy; Reproduction; Business; Law; Public administration; Political science; Law and economics; Health care; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.025021490122726534,"score_gpt":0.3082142648839226,"score_spread":0.2831927747611961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121975356","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24456003,0.016987538,0.00091068196,0.5221676,0.00080416666,0.00014340715,0.0002751959,0.00003287508,0.21411854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9476429,0.0045658043,0.00053947006,0.029248165,0.00006177165,0.000029933326,0.00005006706,0.000023727744,0.017838066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98694485,0.003615748,0.00027728957,0.0006724879,0.0031353072,0.005354283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812406,0.0065102703,0.0010318476,0.00031203715,0.0038695775,0.007035723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0087774955,0.00033215716,0.0005218198,0.0016204393,0.04304599,0.0124055445,0.0024522487,0.005889907,0.007246493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018574651,0.0003440262,0.0003848937,0.004350845,0.023379724,0.0034256182,0.00488577,0.007160317,0.00036755836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079044185,0.00019030845,0.021274146,0.0002770209,0.000043178108,0.0013929341,0.19143103,0.00093952514,0.00043926528,0.64204407,0.09643952,0.045450017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008923696,0.000093887706,0.062059525,0.0011551067,0.00007755585,0.0002908679,0.4086143,0.0022075947,0.00053224195,0.06770808,0.45684755,0.0003241162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99518317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99629325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24041973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24041973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42867032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88100547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122025011","doi":"","title":"Parental Alienation in Quebec Custody Litigation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Skepticism; Child custody; Criminology; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03379692468240754,"score_gpt":0.3786713503598373,"score_spread":0.34487442567742976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122025011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9536097,0.0025740226,0.00031370248,0.004993791,0.00008336947,0.000053104715,0.00015986366,0.000008736316,0.038203705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902181,0.00097512914,0.00009663629,0.00095107616,0.000016058199,0.000026086864,0.000070159665,0.0000049879704,0.007641747],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944002,0.0012636477,0.00022326318,0.000464134,0.0020149567,0.0016338514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922213,0.0028375443,0.0018904591,0.00022518232,0.0019613788,0.0008641074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003719593,0.00026197542,0.00036446494,0.002448152,0.016072592,0.0041537536,0.0014062955,0.0019047898,0.0052338666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013418593,0.00027907573,0.0003301892,0.0037694997,0.0062098494,0.0015980233,0.00392309,0.0022275343,0.00025668],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009505353,0.00011964847,0.2572191,0.0002612953,0.000050258455,0.016582536,0.5981241,0.00088778813,0.0010148224,0.06504148,0.01817829,0.042425685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014927148,0.000074502896,0.50417876,0.001111668,0.00004863764,0.0041880873,0.3806978,0.00084466935,0.00062737224,0.0023903034,0.10569536,0.00012795799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.924873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9642559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075127006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054579232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038443606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39600188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122100145","doi":"","title":"Family as Status in Doe v. Canada: Constituting Family Under Section 15 of the Charter","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Jurisprudence; Assertion; Law; Section (typography); Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.022180678568294504,"score_gpt":0.2787098078567885,"score_spread":0.25652912928849403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122100145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3796176,0.00478601,0.0021080258,0.077866666,0.00062071957,0.00021108853,0.0008253038,0.000061756444,0.5339028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92473495,0.0014057803,0.000809475,0.013861368,0.000056134286,0.00005683038,0.00010239601,0.000022256436,0.058950916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99505806,0.00043896807,0.00009558715,0.0003529338,0.0015820336,0.002472424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789834,0.00051024504,0.00011249091,0.00007977667,0.0007278911,0.00067116256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002919047,0.00028244255,0.0003226327,0.00093304174,0.021641783,0.0047473935,0.0015395992,0.005293856,0.003554694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006076583,0.0004384053,0.00047318335,0.0010875735,0.00781539,0.0014309658,0.0025406023,0.004360881,0.00015159254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007311468,0.000031502273,0.0125358375,0.00004903728,0.00002302473,0.0023962008,0.027202869,0.00061019213,0.0008999905,0.90262735,0.0374236,0.016127242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001615649,0.00014575863,0.07397189,0.00075487304,0.00025079542,0.0017498302,0.069430575,0.0026900303,0.003231178,0.0919869,0.755177,0.00044962976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99336183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99723685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07777687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07777687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16273859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56431335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122291241","doi":"","title":"Conflict resolution processes in end-of-life care disputes between families and healthcare providers in Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Empathy; Health care; Legislature; Conflict resolution; Face (sociological concept); End-of-life care; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Nursing; Palliative care; Social science; Medicine","score_opus":0.05180825918322724,"score_gpt":0.33128338459594103,"score_spread":0.2794751254127138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122291241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83276445,0.007406522,0.0032302728,0.06506535,0.0002841079,0.0006274984,0.00024231829,0.00004263529,0.09033685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910006,0.00082725927,0.001370006,0.0013710947,0.00001228388,0.00005552629,0.00003907925,0.000009679049,0.005314324],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98561156,0.0072416402,0.00061938196,0.0007381117,0.00248492,0.0033043928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97350794,0.013164464,0.0032077234,0.00045648738,0.004398709,0.0052646836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011218893,0.00031584947,0.00034439357,0.0014189888,0.04587076,0.007856123,0.0027995876,0.0035408256,0.0036675783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044131037,0.00046674238,0.00043518416,0.0022109991,0.015001855,0.003451094,0.007351719,0.00403924,0.00023458766],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009237366,0.000081838916,0.024060337,0.00012994402,0.000017447706,0.0038361612,0.87280005,0.0005975131,0.0002166307,0.055312023,0.009291324,0.033564255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028811794,0.000020340201,0.025218006,0.00028384745,0.000013704206,0.0006566496,0.89843506,0.0011021479,0.00024482576,0.011462569,0.062449437,0.00008457402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9778137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1948784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1948784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1981846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9338269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122371168","doi":"","title":"Property and Belongingness: Rethinking Gender-Biased Disinheritance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas journal of women and the law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Estate; Law; Sociology; Property (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Political science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06671037852041627,"score_gpt":0.28051308911035244,"score_spread":0.21380271058993616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122371168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4091262,0.016582564,0.027776754,0.07299176,0.0017864995,0.00009709584,0.00039264048,0.000082931125,0.47116348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98886883,0.0018238163,0.001884697,0.00237934,0.00039698466,0.00007110839,0.000055588807,0.000052959203,0.004466597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969298,0.0019172481,0.00005794661,0.00048708738,0.0003416795,0.0002662457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98689705,0.008953199,0.0015925824,0.0010368895,0.00100329,0.0005170267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047450084,0.0004811035,0.0004379725,0.0024153935,0.0046976963,0.005770182,0.0015336878,0.0018677615,0.010498727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014475771,0.00024361232,0.00048487817,0.0022615134,0.030725759,0.0107181715,0.0064118085,0.0036912237,0.0004109943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040750816,0.000027497725,0.009742361,0.000077698634,0.000011741194,0.00020974291,0.10729108,0.00006820092,0.00015944202,0.85832995,0.0038992094,0.020142317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000266585,0.00007630278,0.06068364,0.0009773382,0.00006687122,0.00063751574,0.18262024,0.0011632573,0.0005366824,0.5796303,0.17351295,0.0000682731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009078296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014819718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010498727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042263586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001436365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03512174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122456056","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1857566","title":"Dworkin's Shadow: Equality Rights and the Supreme Court of Canada's Loss of Dignity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Dignity; Shadow (psychology); Download; Political science; Law; Internet privacy; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Psychology","score_opus":0.02563080300869999,"score_gpt":0.2712209691812855,"score_spread":0.24559016617258553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122456056","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115380496,0.0107383095,0.0022672706,0.44313517,0.0016157513,0.00007320401,0.00036334473,0.0000504181,0.42637607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8722987,0.0021849694,0.00079993653,0.05357951,0.00032114732,0.000043373082,0.000045221204,0.00007663127,0.07065046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911294,0.001253635,0.00017015892,0.0010244569,0.002093821,0.0043286495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99078876,0.0040365425,0.00034036944,0.00035016064,0.002314428,0.0021697693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069760005,0.00043459176,0.0009912467,0.0015492715,0.048184596,0.022412017,0.0038453704,0.021130279,0.01315852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021428771,0.0006526548,0.00060130353,0.0025805493,0.039188392,0.008547785,0.0073010502,0.024351707,0.00048128737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033371158,0.000018183355,0.001040932,0.000024480445,0.00001333338,0.00027137768,0.01488291,0.0002319864,0.00010683028,0.92808074,0.048939105,0.0063568093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014052323,0.000027737085,0.0076647177,0.0006075118,0.00009572329,0.00022500522,0.059676427,0.0012111544,0.00064813247,0.43863815,0.4907764,0.00028853273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98625284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99339104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11355146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11355146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24133906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82387733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122529843","doi":"","title":"Children of Two Logics: A Way into Canadian Constitutional Culture","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Indigenous; Constitutional law; Political science; Law; Constitutional economics; Indigenous rights; Constitutional theory; Sociology; Human rights; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.009464410061252485,"score_gpt":0.274275950649113,"score_spread":0.2648115405878605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122529843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22931466,0.005762295,0.0067802537,0.070832066,0.0005770725,0.00008449052,0.00035116952,0.000105731575,0.6861922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776007,0.0011744633,0.0016941418,0.003364804,0.000041669246,0.000024161844,0.00005326803,0.000061746876,0.015984999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889824,0.0029837305,0.00020285863,0.0013659432,0.003255376,0.0032097297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99072427,0.002577747,0.0005109776,0.00060910784,0.003334022,0.0022438387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063966406,0.0004318951,0.0005829283,0.0027585889,0.03629531,0.018981677,0.0020974833,0.0024314795,0.008926296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01026226,0.0005119621,0.00037474025,0.0042313808,0.053757645,0.007195944,0.007411067,0.008487631,0.00027234227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021834341,0.000011064124,0.0021120328,0.000021334692,0.0000075000594,0.00015358122,0.12999685,0.00013107227,0.00018591076,0.8503065,0.005591425,0.011460885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002698986,0.00003720968,0.010821214,0.0003442472,0.00004290608,0.0002529853,0.2883257,0.00075743237,0.00045424493,0.11718143,0.5815445,0.00021111807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9802838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98861796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82464963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17535037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16850664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9564767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122569314","doi":"","title":"Structures of Judgment: How the ModernSupreme Court of Canada Organizes its Reasons","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.02497555007228185,"score_gpt":0.26464781071650384,"score_spread":0.23967226064422198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122569314","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15938056,0.0013650436,0.0075579453,0.03569614,0.0002764498,0.000104170955,0.00037750046,0.00013037461,0.7951118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9340024,0.0003241607,0.0022131775,0.0018756127,0.00005630184,0.000034216402,0.0000943706,0.00011800332,0.061281756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931704,0.0012732476,0.00012604153,0.0008596483,0.0020078851,0.002562794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914375,0.002230948,0.00029120294,0.0006750613,0.0035252448,0.0018401319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004897784,0.0003416743,0.0004661977,0.0029875706,0.03160671,0.025257882,0.0030394907,0.0056881127,0.018463798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020034382,0.00081425416,0.00065161,0.0035758587,0.025245385,0.00500672,0.0047519356,0.0057837632,0.0011957359],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002270392,0.000016219106,0.0023838794,0.00001098976,0.000011642301,0.00012832062,0.017706722,0.0006929063,0.00017561094,0.9493154,0.019142399,0.0103931995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006229661,0.000026996167,0.023747642,0.00023261644,0.000074594485,0.00010933396,0.04515479,0.0044364478,0.0009047591,0.39955118,0.5254694,0.00022996472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97203344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98888993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12598555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12598555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16155368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9140934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122584327","doi":"10.3138/jcs.43.3.146","title":"Sunshine Cases of a Little Constitution","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Feeling; Contemplation; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Federalist; Law; Diversity (politics); Ideology; Aesthetics; History; Politics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09047524147165761,"score_gpt":0.3650112640917478,"score_spread":0.27453602262009014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122584327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06765284,0.0041556587,0.0008990585,0.04797849,0.0009300761,0.00002267102,0.00013685798,0.0000713428,0.87815285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87048,0.0015923847,0.0003664591,0.011266227,0.00018584072,0.000024640718,0.0000623552,0.00009328524,0.11592874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964095,0.0006305117,0.00003728767,0.00032041044,0.0011563097,0.0014459057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969495,0.001087456,0.00009100079,0.0002110103,0.0010594123,0.00060165435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002094543,0.00028676877,0.0004075731,0.0023070935,0.04430398,0.011964858,0.0012322483,0.0035729967,0.009100805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007844035,0.00029918103,0.00038541842,0.0026597476,0.02546252,0.0030277285,0.0042119185,0.0059510297,0.0005876533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040329374,0.0000100603,0.000731088,0.000034719673,0.000008607664,0.00059957244,0.02881574,0.00013967523,0.00023497538,0.913185,0.048292264,0.0079078935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019345825,0.00001348798,0.0024383897,0.000214106,0.000028075408,0.00025304957,0.04157328,0.00021673541,0.00052049966,0.064096674,0.89058393,0.000042434225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8443439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.944893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1556561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056137376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044914447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4073071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122689219","doi":"","title":"Federal Constitutionalism and Aboriginal Difference","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Federalism; Treaty; Law; Sovereignty; Political science; Autonomy; Constitution; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.007391731028377972,"score_gpt":0.20896961210449158,"score_spread":0.2015778810761136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122689219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018387137,0.009272071,0.008038095,0.060892474,0.0006260636,0.00004006056,0.00008545682,0.00007178132,0.9025869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8186898,0.0039939857,0.0030780532,0.013224623,0.0002850082,0.000066205044,0.000078504316,0.000047466197,0.1605364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996436,0.0007119712,0.00007153578,0.0004910006,0.0010151013,0.0012744444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991972,0.0002830174,0.00006075957,0.000098792334,0.00024155734,0.00011872685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021564644,0.0002536715,0.00028073802,0.0011106377,0.01179187,0.005580785,0.0012279517,0.0023773918,0.00437477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002649713,0.00019433987,0.0004202374,0.0011398499,0.026907073,0.0025467,0.0031764354,0.0045189494,0.00025061984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.2808593e-7,7.3713875e-7,0.000028270315,0.0000019335196,4.323566e-7,0.000009140189,0.0006348979,0.000030895157,0.000008889017,0.99751544,0.0010181274,0.0007506918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011389328,0.000008550428,0.0013392146,0.00009458159,0.000009947648,0.0000615169,0.0023373798,0.00038278848,0.00020087359,0.56945896,0.42607188,0.000022936796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7339434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7444482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2660566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0488011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039987843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53524685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122700238","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4480","title":"Dizzying Dialogue: Canadian Courts and the Continuing Justification of the Dispossession Of Aboriginal People","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Doctrine; Supreme court; Conciliation; Law; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Arbitration","score_opus":0.03848112590642711,"score_gpt":0.3252010623644886,"score_spread":0.2867199364580615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122700238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0686563,0.027398163,0.002388411,0.28452295,0.0011196868,0.000047461002,0.00016934794,0.0000580605,0.6156396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9222372,0.0073044095,0.0014393101,0.026521258,0.0003485924,0.000036140336,0.000058125832,0.000055923912,0.041998938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878007,0.0029817917,0.00020979372,0.001037733,0.0046772575,0.0032927422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98749965,0.00620596,0.00039621993,0.00043164278,0.004316025,0.0011505168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008994957,0.0004341562,0.0007050564,0.0028114202,0.055706225,0.020722242,0.0040987944,0.0105712265,0.0055595944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022597626,0.00042824377,0.00048822345,0.004149007,0.045899037,0.0059969975,0.0068794303,0.010940418,0.00028470816],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012007574,0.0000069501666,0.00049339153,0.000034829034,0.000006434121,0.0002542572,0.042598695,0.00012715085,0.000074948206,0.92396754,0.024474612,0.007949258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050505638,0.000015887183,0.0046935156,0.0007503182,0.000064755965,0.00021191961,0.07685882,0.0010321,0.00035007042,0.27050415,0.64532316,0.00014478562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9860848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8266674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17333256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19676116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95881706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122749857","doi":"","title":"Section 15(1) at the Supreme Court 2001-2002: Caution and Conflict in Defining “The Most Difficult Right”","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Section (typography); Law; Political science; High Court; Theme (computing); Sociology","score_opus":0.06232311638796742,"score_gpt":0.30792491247418763,"score_spread":0.2456017960862202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122749857","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035876922,0.012283309,0.0054411027,0.7317673,0.0047532017,0.00016228957,0.00051597087,0.0001001064,0.20909974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32175943,0.003067715,0.005937452,0.62236196,0.0029091379,0.00029278806,0.00020007734,0.00012896828,0.043342553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.953804,0.015862059,0.0034769583,0.0060970313,0.015076847,0.0056832447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96123475,0.028779434,0.001273138,0.0011515904,0.0059565683,0.0016044872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03662193,0.00067481084,0.0016620258,0.002332052,0.025348859,0.025622956,0.007901126,0.037902534,0.0024595344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06401545,0.0016504838,0.0012764989,0.003197151,0.02294869,0.008649949,0.0051517403,0.042971592,0.00096177036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029031806,0.00002571048,0.0010739875,0.00011530838,0.000025161788,0.0005009393,0.013381128,0.00019445184,0.00028021983,0.813913,0.16144896,0.009012094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011183404,0.000057225778,0.006082452,0.002035628,0.00012902562,0.00062716735,0.017916264,0.0009597852,0.0015509151,0.26311055,0.7071316,0.00028751272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4285059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6145292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4285059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028734826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047253523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8520234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122932967","doi":"","title":"Women’s Court of Canada Act and Rules","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.19605175340236447,"score_gpt":0.5225553035277017,"score_spread":0.32650355012533727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122932967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006054753,0.004862742,0.0018388088,0.046605643,0.0014827223,0.00023787294,0.0020256236,0.00012513356,0.9367668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2166167,0.0048134094,0.005034267,0.058457498,0.0006159559,0.00047575872,0.0014970021,0.00014941374,0.7123399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873247,0.0010289893,0.00043439213,0.0013246797,0.0065229763,0.003364244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942409,0.0008944749,0.00020739232,0.00031202057,0.0035142072,0.00083104253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003955477,0.0007632537,0.00058082584,0.0020275002,0.016825302,0.0113647245,0.0025730822,0.007399577,0.015360666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0127791315,0.0006978193,0.0007410411,0.0021609582,0.0066097365,0.0018642907,0.002290782,0.00626886,0.0022935944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012178451,0.000011132642,0.00072146405,0.000027798806,0.000006907999,0.00009508383,0.0013736691,0.0002403329,0.00011056826,0.8625812,0.12795441,0.0068652355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021469461,0.0000100379875,0.0025151528,0.0002220367,0.000021524671,0.0000455454,0.0009381031,0.00042784167,0.00016753275,0.02242496,0.97314227,0.00006348859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99017334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.993313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107458204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.107458204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24889773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7796675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123014080","doi":"","title":"Judging in Marriage's Shadow","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Openness to experience; Shadow (psychology); Ideal (ethics); Operationalization; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Diversity (politics); Law; Political science; Social psychology; Gender studies; Psychology; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022279420709753237,"score_gpt":0.32493288851896934,"score_spread":0.3026534678092161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123014080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20172344,0.0010983014,0.011319944,0.021123482,0.00052633166,0.000051556653,0.00007497043,0.00006253115,0.7640195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890282,0.00017278474,0.0007155666,0.00063738204,0.00006522517,0.0000065447143,0.000012609073,0.00001727583,0.00934437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956494,0.0016531951,0.00012450162,0.00060283643,0.0011346795,0.00083541527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942319,0.002725835,0.0004034557,0.00045054426,0.0015632691,0.00062495115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005585413,0.00018474282,0.0003984231,0.0011556542,0.011036828,0.006423256,0.000784589,0.0015699435,0.009072146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016545191,0.00018075852,0.00025133794,0.0007854904,0.022893157,0.003994279,0.004753361,0.0030083274,0.000481034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029939205,0.000010262132,0.0031713871,0.000022613442,0.000004069319,0.00026081147,0.06472316,0.00011540793,0.0003618606,0.90653706,0.00483731,0.019926105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034038152,0.00006819863,0.013148894,0.00021201781,0.000037064492,0.0002629032,0.13666266,0.001343389,0.0019253211,0.53151464,0.31473103,0.000059834947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08353153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12320513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08353153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008227673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006885858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16609067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123033447","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-4710-4","title":"Dialogues on Human Rights and Legal Pluralism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Ius gentium","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Human rights; Legal pluralism; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Law; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Legal research; Legal realism","score_opus":0.06436380612440411,"score_gpt":0.3301025778831703,"score_spread":0.2657387717587662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123033447","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045985887,0.025784394,0.001569766,0.039958566,0.0020039047,0.00001750549,0.000018687104,0.000021226337,0.9260274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39152926,0.019961953,0.0027225777,0.024746647,0.0034072541,0.00019522765,0.000055269258,0.0002151235,0.5571667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99662834,0.0022718299,0.00005303147,0.00017748155,0.00052198465,0.00034728297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971437,0.002268018,0.00006310546,0.00016418869,0.00015253392,0.00020840766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004617738,0.0007295475,0.00085568655,0.0017177698,0.011019749,0.011526922,0.0012632133,0.0058582,0.011867081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004164579,0.00031581605,0.00036781793,0.0022235783,0.030162513,0.010863655,0.005823528,0.008521095,0.001013926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021750634,0.000008289743,0.000010015411,0.000018069704,9.789746e-7,0.00002428914,0.007302622,0.000027322063,0.000019113864,0.9715056,0.017311411,0.003770028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066197185,0.0000059638664,0.0001579395,0.00027830206,0.0000027157014,0.00008034124,0.01030033,0.0001325408,0.000068633315,0.5354582,0.45350012,0.000008261323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01110016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023080252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011867081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009388957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005767373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06812197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123237373","doi":"10.59962/9780774814997-013","title":"11 Law’s Religion: Rendering Culture","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rendering (computer graphics); Sociology; Art; Computer science; Computer graphics (images)","score_opus":0.0243890172007462,"score_gpt":0.21935898858915182,"score_spread":0.1949699713884056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123237373","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07983238,0.003911453,0.00586605,0.029970694,0.000425606,0.00002697257,0.00011264656,0.000065840824,0.8797884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96514034,0.0012248949,0.00095780607,0.002268717,0.000065516244,0.000011944191,0.000035875088,0.000032227857,0.030262692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967451,0.0010022883,0.00005680397,0.0002625492,0.0009812315,0.00095197133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827063,0.00046880855,0.00012580435,0.00016712878,0.0005544564,0.0004132199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020495174,0.00028184752,0.00023817559,0.0012558785,0.013354532,0.011295607,0.0012459714,0.0017602426,0.0053862664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036950677,0.00018498905,0.00025233705,0.0013008508,0.039512675,0.003561434,0.0047071124,0.0037269918,0.0003654686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058315895,0.0000045324045,0.00075169903,0.000014336388,0.0000030501844,0.00008801965,0.021982335,0.00009666469,0.00020274807,0.9688381,0.002235832,0.005776865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021512598,0.000027438831,0.009022155,0.00034515615,0.000031325973,0.00017499737,0.082741,0.00057773787,0.00096757506,0.25734773,0.6486654,0.00007801597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7994475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8695553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7994475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03988647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04010861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40346718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123265750","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1359","title":"Choices and Commitments for Women: Challenging the Supreme Court of Canada in the Context of Social Assitance","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Supreme Court Decisions; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.030901921147828425,"score_gpt":0.2915819025345159,"score_spread":0.26067998138668746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123265750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36068445,0.0035478245,0.0017721495,0.28795773,0.0007744392,0.0001566477,0.00017817187,0.00003002792,0.34489858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95208883,0.00071569043,0.0004633642,0.02015468,0.00011468818,0.0000612105,0.000023638459,0.00003596201,0.026341906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98113555,0.004480465,0.00024786944,0.0015797887,0.0026452497,0.009911083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98203295,0.0070980256,0.00068175,0.00038169711,0.0031863183,0.006619151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011467105,0.0007038487,0.0014124378,0.0017670281,0.102190726,0.03454689,0.006535363,0.025919925,0.0100930305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026585117,0.00096011505,0.00096639374,0.0031436337,0.05888623,0.007574825,0.01426329,0.027681967,0.00052756513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012708819,0.00007204394,0.0044167847,0.000048932096,0.00005169028,0.0016412769,0.16305794,0.0008960598,0.00029857084,0.78895295,0.03229185,0.008144814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013324064,0.00005754513,0.0083955275,0.00049970887,0.00012396365,0.00022836997,0.53982157,0.0016911431,0.0005652025,0.20899616,0.2391649,0.00032263694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98189306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99334335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1754994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1754994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26668257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95630383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123288322","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal Title in Recent Supreme Court of Canada Jurisprudence: What Remains of Radical Crown Title?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Element (criminal law); Assertion; Negotiation; Doctrine; Sovereignty; Crown (dentistry); Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01471896982157139,"score_gpt":0.2902955722324222,"score_spread":0.2755766024108508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123288322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16131067,0.03127628,0.0035889468,0.24565482,0.0022045241,0.00011145847,0.0005007743,0.000115508294,0.55523705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9073428,0.00415846,0.0017854169,0.03675143,0.0005068276,0.00004834741,0.00010118721,0.000049699313,0.049255904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99139166,0.0009771626,0.00023421127,0.0011624463,0.0034328848,0.0028016563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922091,0.003472113,0.00030869493,0.00033571114,0.002711519,0.0009628945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068468447,0.0002740815,0.000674329,0.0014267395,0.0279482,0.016488314,0.0037517403,0.008731845,0.0030610296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014522198,0.00042682223,0.0005425618,0.0027489355,0.026513819,0.00347639,0.0032669152,0.010944288,0.00020933109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011225294,0.000008078979,0.0007899887,0.000038357142,0.000008687828,0.00018335646,0.010264023,0.00016477965,0.00013676003,0.97191554,0.011921826,0.004557225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006949701,0.00003544766,0.012475887,0.000767479,0.0001216936,0.00022110782,0.01868278,0.0017757306,0.00086716027,0.26259834,0.702125,0.00025975314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9799423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99018586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13881291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13881291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16277693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99885494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123342964","doi":"","title":"Health Care and Human Rights after Auton and Chaoulli","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Entitlement (fair division); Supreme court; Law; Human rights; Political science; Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy); Health care; Right to health; Economics","score_opus":0.01750586372051126,"score_gpt":0.33855989130997166,"score_spread":0.3210540275894604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123342964","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035378654,0.07936211,0.0023643128,0.56886697,0.019716932,0.00016447621,0.00055854133,0.00010380361,0.32532498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11735232,0.01610092,0.002065012,0.5635932,0.012412495,0.00034501488,0.00025813127,0.00013922802,0.28773373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910721,0.0019680415,0.00037312403,0.0019366125,0.003415115,0.0012350145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933333,0.00443323,0.00018273537,0.0004329927,0.0013187762,0.00029899325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007494788,0.0008141428,0.00069399155,0.0011117518,0.01069571,0.011756294,0.0016512288,0.01833518,0.0067558507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012545004,0.0004940934,0.0007188463,0.0020667808,0.01993508,0.007501061,0.00305709,0.028866949,0.0018941063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022112736,0.000013565997,0.00015391115,0.00004744246,0.000005947749,0.00012040793,0.0019984702,0.00006210814,0.00007162388,0.71873784,0.26724255,0.011523983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001703309,0.000017626988,0.0007604597,0.00033154324,0.0000065014056,0.000066381785,0.0006904539,0.00012969077,0.0001661308,0.06680087,0.93097234,0.000041025465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24273534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26913255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7572647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02174765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012368578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48264492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123410778","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511596766.014","title":"The Inuit Petition as a Bridge? Beyond Dialectics of Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples' Rights","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Dialectic; Bridge (graph theory); Climate change; Political science; Environmental ethics; Geography; Geology; Oceanography; Ecology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Medicine; Biology","score_opus":0.0281640969411972,"score_gpt":0.2400107049448777,"score_spread":0.2118466080036805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123410778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012384837,0.008164371,0.00082769414,0.032348517,0.0010503645,0.000010853615,0.000014638712,0.000015550095,0.9451831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57163423,0.0067193992,0.0006862554,0.013007962,0.00071843265,0.000063227504,0.000025300324,0.000074450414,0.40707073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901533,0.00047720654,0.000015266589,0.000072957126,0.00016687521,0.0002524455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945253,0.00032688066,0.00002345244,0.000041576925,0.00007305353,0.000082466184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013423663,0.00032851126,0.0003320587,0.0005402517,0.0099844895,0.0077304817,0.0011615277,0.003156418,0.008217649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018547862,0.00019404766,0.00021632737,0.00094579975,0.013821112,0.008297007,0.0031737506,0.006743383,0.00079428515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036953688,0.00001085179,0.000064385815,0.000018732053,0.0000012129801,0.00010097358,0.029851697,0.000022852291,0.000039538238,0.9517025,0.01325919,0.004924428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067567325,0.000014679004,0.00055566593,0.0003378439,0.000006929403,0.00022182772,0.052924562,0.00019363772,0.00022315621,0.21911955,0.72637993,0.000015485708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055733044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11547825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.944267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058936104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005742673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11081731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123458335","doi":"10.5663/aps.v6i2.28316","title":"Daniels v. Canada: Origins, Intentions, Futures","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"aboriginal policy studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Supreme court; Futures contract; Law; Indigenous; Political science; Plaintiff; Transformative learning; Culmination; High Court; Sociology; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.05227079603683185,"score_gpt":0.4250142118501366,"score_spread":0.3727434158133047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123458335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04093695,0.013032914,0.0007566904,0.37498024,0.0011477834,0.00009171479,0.0007708146,0.00006793769,0.5682149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58505905,0.010992331,0.0013761702,0.18508619,0.0004385549,0.000121379264,0.00030828777,0.00011016067,0.21650793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877943,0.0010391673,0.00015121792,0.0009272293,0.005168435,0.0049196705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994344,0.0013414979,0.00022252552,0.0002169801,0.002147464,0.0017276056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058329827,0.00044376805,0.00050819915,0.0017020247,0.04930338,0.013135574,0.0029195051,0.011279334,0.008134337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0120273465,0.00054318615,0.0004898961,0.0029659225,0.02615154,0.0034425014,0.0052406956,0.014688354,0.00064979546],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002271255,0.000018855673,0.00221464,0.000049316972,0.000007143727,0.00047007966,0.013903594,0.00012382804,0.00011571978,0.8261088,0.146972,0.00999339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029504421,0.000015858608,0.005377502,0.0008038439,0.000027815371,0.00030653,0.033089668,0.00029252758,0.00049620395,0.07181724,0.88759315,0.0001502217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99250245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14332968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14332968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33217138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99361616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123568123","doi":"","title":"Kahkewistahaw First Nation v. Taypotat – Whither Section 25 of the Charter?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Section (typography); Treaty; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.017927133674378728,"score_gpt":0.2576354158819763,"score_spread":0.23970828220759757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123568123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087783076,0.008573269,0.0035200466,0.38484833,0.0050983382,0.00013860555,0.00044245902,0.00014161943,0.5094543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6482864,0.0028684577,0.0020082588,0.20368394,0.000737694,0.00009054898,0.00017585496,0.000073469426,0.14207536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995167,0.0005596079,0.00011222325,0.00053742575,0.0013688367,0.002254967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780566,0.00077437883,0.00015486106,0.00011358081,0.000785702,0.00036585715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003210477,0.00024772203,0.00027684358,0.0005014756,0.010272184,0.008297843,0.0017951697,0.0082414,0.0047894083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008720201,0.00032093804,0.0005844101,0.00064316957,0.005646276,0.0029080221,0.0016741132,0.008434166,0.0009616677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035024626,0.00002549362,0.0024566501,0.00005687314,0.000013510101,0.0009126244,0.006882763,0.00016817385,0.00065787614,0.8155611,0.15902206,0.014207862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004025967,0.000055337783,0.0101586515,0.00034463883,0.000056191544,0.00044020973,0.017150316,0.000656512,0.0016257601,0.063994,0.90532464,0.00015342857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67953444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81930643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32046556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017926862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03442714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64470565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123630022","doi":"","title":"Contract Thinking was Marvin's Fatal Flaw","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Obligation; Supreme court; Duty; Doctrine; Unjust enrichment; Annulment; Reciprocal; Cohabitation; Liability; Breach of contract; Sociology; Domestic relations; Legal doctrine; Political science; Law and economics; Family law; Damages; Philosophy; Restitution","score_opus":0.03328307539094221,"score_gpt":0.31744532127446023,"score_spread":0.284162245883518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123630022","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057043806,0.007162672,0.021351796,0.78428215,0.007134707,0.000052077103,0.0000796022,0.000117375916,0.17411529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41512454,0.00787089,0.01692891,0.38899007,0.01244624,0.0003991145,0.00008389024,0.000391776,0.15776458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895705,0.0038662336,0.00037425107,0.00211194,0.003320619,0.0007563537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98950994,0.007069661,0.00038386125,0.0007479084,0.0017714889,0.00051720446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017484892,0.00076770375,0.0009223427,0.0012280266,0.009432675,0.009472832,0.0030144663,0.013809573,0.0048621865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028921533,0.00072694774,0.0010698946,0.00077693205,0.036148615,0.013945681,0.0048286445,0.025058541,0.0018652802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042195156,0.0000050390963,0.000032130534,0.0000075584717,0.0000021113792,0.00001872064,0.0006187762,0.00006646506,0.000008893359,0.9761361,0.020985624,0.002114411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015948171,0.000012612457,0.00006224633,0.00013260348,0.0000060304546,0.00007920108,0.00049984525,0.00038577412,0.000080739315,0.77717084,0.22153749,0.000016607992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011755453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008560151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017484892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009711902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012682491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09247005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123647317","doi":"10.1080/13200968.2007.10854388","title":"Re-Covering The Limits Of Recognition: The Politics Of Difference And Decolonisation In John Borrows’ <i>Recovering Canada: The Resurgence of Indigenous Law</i>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Feminist Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Politics; Decolonization; Law; Political science; Relation (database); Critical appraisal; Biology; Medicine; Computer science; Data mining; Ecology","score_opus":0.062998829402604,"score_gpt":0.3147718153824303,"score_spread":0.25177298597982634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123647317","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0867856,0.017051708,0.0020707753,0.52774525,0.0011242421,0.00004878257,0.00009797461,0.000053751795,0.36502194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8966553,0.0024964553,0.0006058312,0.048740722,0.00023422648,0.000035088276,0.000030966716,0.000086662476,0.051114656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899548,0.0020785208,0.00019117212,0.0007210592,0.0031155355,0.0039389487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956067,0.0015219304,0.00027902165,0.0002657408,0.001309817,0.001016727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069942907,0.00041349244,0.0007850377,0.0012256468,0.043680362,0.016058467,0.0030263052,0.010631816,0.006699921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010208977,0.00041569586,0.0004546025,0.0019197224,0.090696424,0.009302925,0.013331137,0.018333722,0.0005371015],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026591691,0.000017560253,0.0008399119,0.00005760421,0.000008104271,0.00037707324,0.16023292,0.00012661227,0.00030575515,0.7559292,0.06657117,0.015507603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040386287,0.000024289071,0.004504147,0.00049136544,0.000025366811,0.00036495648,0.22101666,0.00020630378,0.000808229,0.12465547,0.64774823,0.000114565344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9019877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9438112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09801233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06068481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09781651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44030124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123769923","doi":"","title":"Section 1, Constitutional Reasoning and Cultural Difference: Assessing the Impacts of Alberta v. Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Charter; Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Constitutionalism; Irony; Political science; Constitutional law; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Democracy","score_opus":0.021997061483145727,"score_gpt":0.33776435952085687,"score_spread":0.31576729803771114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123769923","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48639953,0.0068601985,0.0008060879,0.054173235,0.00038192424,0.0003842692,0.00075431966,0.000035855304,0.45020458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.957238,0.001839067,0.0006198114,0.012893002,0.00007421119,0.00007118162,0.00018997303,0.000016056565,0.027058713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97921115,0.0023748423,0.00026902236,0.0008573485,0.012768243,0.0045193224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98473996,0.007647554,0.0010340855,0.0004299813,0.004278844,0.0018695446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073193545,0.00046469583,0.00044419488,0.0025266237,0.021883396,0.010040285,0.0038104625,0.0046084695,0.0049328147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031110266,0.0004962138,0.0004770124,0.003508118,0.01818884,0.002741921,0.0037820803,0.0059443703,0.00020657192],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032996206,0.00029868548,0.097515896,0.0003107082,0.00010576023,0.0024862546,0.035595242,0.0027605563,0.0010629128,0.74017686,0.07488308,0.044474054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002655654,0.00066850835,0.38946185,0.001686708,0.0005284391,0.000615882,0.13732965,0.0030805068,0.0034883206,0.106349394,0.3560369,0.00048830005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9866469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10180106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10180106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15659407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73862183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123809131","doi":"","title":"Two Roads Diverged: A Comparative Analysis of Indigenous Rights in a North American Constitutional Context","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Indigenous; Parliament; Context (archaeology); Politics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Indian country; Constitutional law; Political economy; Public administration; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.01784374753787008,"score_gpt":0.3090488353817329,"score_spread":0.2912050878438628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123809131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72857237,0.0018387281,0.00018684652,0.0027307486,0.00003251752,0.00002247061,0.000034061595,0.0000055245446,0.26657686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99516875,0.00053099345,0.00008381102,0.00018588455,0.00000994816,0.000013539409,0.000015544252,0.000005528769,0.0039859433],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959265,0.001630768,0.000072748815,0.00027445093,0.0007137375,0.0013817174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956974,0.002476595,0.00038498503,0.00019975695,0.0007909987,0.00045033786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029758418,0.00015118603,0.00038871422,0.003929335,0.021623766,0.006968988,0.0013213677,0.001204107,0.0074814204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066227643,0.00021602685,0.00026307473,0.005987208,0.016950179,0.005677435,0.0052297544,0.002243328,0.00019686003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006889503,0.00009134684,0.016471697,0.00015317659,0.000027188644,0.0008945732,0.6435789,0.00016176762,0.00035676325,0.31449363,0.0020938767,0.021608153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064473966,0.00003291019,0.06173494,0.00021684176,0.000035784404,0.00014515257,0.8754252,0.00013616784,0.00013166726,0.010289547,0.05182324,0.000022185777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3758456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7102465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6241544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02034173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011613054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7473159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123819213","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1692895","title":"Liberté Contractuelle Et Relations Conjugales: Font-Elles Bon Ménage?","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Font; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.015527873445617435,"score_gpt":0.29696567317081246,"score_spread":0.281437799725195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123819213","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19831164,0.025478192,0.0051749405,0.2172468,0.0023382364,0.000046195535,0.00030354437,0.000066577675,0.5510338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9196211,0.0087423,0.0012967867,0.0058586095,0.0015991395,0.00009669269,0.00012598229,0.00006779669,0.06259168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99257916,0.0039538187,0.00014953816,0.0006669591,0.0011318206,0.0015187239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99221957,0.0040150983,0.0012014726,0.0006154737,0.0007131767,0.0012352463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008150267,0.0006872185,0.00094693486,0.0009937827,0.011431265,0.01792629,0.0013478679,0.00684406,0.025994191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017858012,0.00041621152,0.00053090334,0.0024759728,0.020288177,0.018718526,0.0055202553,0.011290591,0.0019895032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057819205,0.000081612605,0.0017844473,0.00003617426,0.000010357253,0.00020776749,0.027646618,0.00004972325,0.000068765614,0.94889504,0.005814249,0.015347445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013791498,0.00007501568,0.02161812,0.0007945676,0.000028091526,0.0013185076,0.15799746,0.00047779217,0.00031674994,0.227895,0.5892252,0.00011559429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041841723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042583603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041841723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072741075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00667794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08695918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123923553","doi":"","title":"Enforcing a Parent/Child Relationship at All Cost?: Supervised Access Orders in the Canadian Courts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Key (lock); Focus group; Component (thermodynamics); Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Social psychology; Political science; Computer security","score_opus":0.16740974870066885,"score_gpt":0.34736195174549017,"score_spread":0.17995220304482132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123923553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91787344,0.00085531664,0.00070310815,0.013793175,0.00006280794,0.00009263577,0.00016596494,0.00002087132,0.06643253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934006,0.00041619322,0.00036735265,0.0007360385,0.000007900386,0.0000124816825,0.000026995192,0.000008297634,0.0050242483],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99300295,0.0012040575,0.00021574143,0.00053361774,0.0028149772,0.002228582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875122,0.004156231,0.0012327353,0.00046349198,0.004099081,0.002536303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046303556,0.00023149475,0.00034088272,0.0015110839,0.034831397,0.006721528,0.0020790743,0.002237737,0.0019712567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021167412,0.00051827804,0.00022587372,0.003072697,0.011228445,0.0023945223,0.0033640552,0.0040391823,0.0001207835],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006504441,0.00007599395,0.044823393,0.000082238745,0.00002472443,0.0040353425,0.814561,0.0006087005,0.0011783516,0.0881004,0.014716198,0.0317286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016058855,0.00003382755,0.118991226,0.00021896779,0.000041444444,0.00080731517,0.7401044,0.0009785978,0.0009836946,0.00391859,0.13373944,0.00016646217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99482536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16593339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16593339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16250436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96739906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123992025","doi":"","title":"Meaningless mantra: substantive equality after Withler","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mantra; Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Section (typography); Context (archaeology); Substantive due process; Relevance (law); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09327847133984746,"score_gpt":0.3019885457289145,"score_spread":0.20871007438906702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123992025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05194759,0.005913338,0.020392481,0.08798637,0.0016902159,0.00011857744,0.00008366326,0.0001251409,0.8317426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8564104,0.0013421215,0.003795216,0.03491636,0.00041088325,0.00008669227,0.000037184713,0.00010477138,0.10289631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98612833,0.003942983,0.00026672758,0.0019785427,0.0044773743,0.0032060908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951492,0.0030058867,0.00022868125,0.00037822366,0.0010091035,0.00022885817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007257516,0.0004376637,0.0006862669,0.0012584734,0.018038038,0.012413838,0.0020857241,0.006916358,0.0049509117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013518248,0.00028136745,0.00061455567,0.0010944789,0.039954808,0.0070651034,0.0068812487,0.009127362,0.0004050483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053387175,0.0000035533556,0.00010621009,0.0000115532375,0.0000017849494,0.00007990854,0.003002243,0.000041202886,0.00005412537,0.99057454,0.002847976,0.0032715371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003705586,0.000059272046,0.0012029244,0.00029739874,0.000054333745,0.00036402003,0.013330439,0.00048296846,0.001961174,0.5125305,0.46957123,0.000108665685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41356656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56290483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41356656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022205407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027362095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8223187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124002302","doi":"","title":"Sexual Assault Law, Credibility, and 'Ideal Victims': Consent, Resistance, and Victim Blaming","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Sexual assault; Psychology; Redress; Social psychology; Resistance (ecology); Criminology; Blame; Law; Political science; Poison control; Medicine; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.05438854300195671,"score_gpt":0.2733467632838719,"score_spread":0.2189582202819152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124002302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6919642,0.010463184,0.01019504,0.11072588,0.00031006028,0.00010221378,0.00003494951,0.0000692948,0.17613517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948467,0.0014146545,0.0005914539,0.0012751875,0.00005202861,0.0000143958205,0.0000043090004,0.0000104382325,0.0017908238],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859007,0.010906937,0.00030108797,0.00031828473,0.0017803259,0.0007926925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725302,0.021230571,0.0034082609,0.0010553739,0.0012440089,0.0005316499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012429536,0.00030750904,0.00032038408,0.001609145,0.0055685067,0.011198958,0.0017258395,0.0041303947,0.0029851142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048437905,0.0002968781,0.00024002373,0.0010314579,0.053782146,0.009303502,0.0050552883,0.005121216,0.0002756029],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003936136,0.000042813845,0.005121508,0.00012917643,0.000011764839,0.0010815666,0.5905917,0.00014468441,0.00043980783,0.37646863,0.0023204905,0.02360851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002024045,0.00013243241,0.012118887,0.0008896397,0.000033750446,0.0035182645,0.76596767,0.0011067295,0.001598268,0.15979037,0.054737814,0.000085957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0111884875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01055152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012429536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051180203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004112825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065734446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124132668","doi":"","title":"BANKRUPTCY, PROVINCIAL LAW, AND THE FAMILY FARM","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Bankruptcy; Insolvency; Statute; Family law; Reform Act; Political science; Estate; Damages; Legislative intent; Legislature","score_opus":0.030563315560485724,"score_gpt":0.2828547792924247,"score_spread":0.25229146373193895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124132668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24600706,0.01051663,0.0014546794,0.13429007,0.00035976598,0.000036898786,0.0002619673,0.000061503815,0.60701144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95314074,0.0012107836,0.00030075462,0.008912481,0.000048069734,0.000008150019,0.000032661756,0.000011927575,0.036334407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827385,0.0002248855,0.00003528738,0.00013694698,0.00037176136,0.0009571589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980862,0.0006343153,0.00016471703,0.00009893918,0.0004899199,0.00052595284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010783091,0.00011024894,0.0001775207,0.00069324364,0.019187346,0.0073216897,0.0009509103,0.0028145674,0.0058902367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003942466,0.00022210632,0.00021009851,0.0010015367,0.014752895,0.0013136395,0.0020622704,0.0033330591,0.00025030223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002384417,0.000022618502,0.009299956,0.000027481821,0.000007276105,0.0005171887,0.011902002,0.00034482733,0.00019224056,0.9338747,0.03019729,0.013590588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006702577,0.000052868556,0.08631755,0.0007043361,0.00007033833,0.0006475126,0.04515686,0.0024193865,0.00089038594,0.20562716,0.65791726,0.00012936928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.972748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9878249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07185169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07185169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07376728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52132297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124152775","doi":"","title":"A Situational Approach to Incapacity and Mental Disability in Sexual Assault Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Psychology; Situational ethics; Context (archaeology); Law; Criminology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.029766024349389703,"score_gpt":0.2912765160196001,"score_spread":0.2615104916702104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124152775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17843282,0.017479183,0.022926662,0.08411387,0.000693639,0.00018150531,0.00010819154,0.00007760328,0.6959865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913288,0.0015936234,0.0013328772,0.0021132615,0.00016186645,0.000061113016,0.000015228953,0.0000074406244,0.0033856875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99474007,0.003355831,0.00026434998,0.00024912707,0.0005710592,0.00081958505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953622,0.0024612092,0.0005313368,0.0003000592,0.00055488036,0.00079036824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029966873,0.0004216169,0.00024850573,0.0032212099,0.008125915,0.007549899,0.0017209757,0.0042111604,0.0026307455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006289586,0.00040783818,0.00039271617,0.0015462243,0.03485392,0.0058281873,0.007959092,0.004958371,0.00017703745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050965914,0.000032583972,0.0027711699,0.00004302463,0.0000036964982,0.0011079195,0.017993761,0.00019548464,0.00006490345,0.9718608,0.001357841,0.004563676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020171485,0.00008078349,0.014079347,0.00082554505,0.000033947003,0.00396933,0.141968,0.0013360596,0.00031005952,0.74564046,0.09166394,0.0000722982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03687302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057712153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03687302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008835969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010175113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07331675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124243876","doi":"","title":"An Exemption for Sincere Believers: The Challenge of Alberta versus Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Sincerity; Context (archaeology); Charter; Test (biology); Government (linguistics); Civil procedure; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.04701251184942391,"score_gpt":0.3193123188179845,"score_spread":0.2722998069685606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124243876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18128599,0.0036260008,0.0025074584,0.1856969,0.00086304196,0.00010580292,0.00009912571,0.00006363763,0.625752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8754321,0.0009010286,0.0016173652,0.04665038,0.00019832386,0.00003994808,0.000041477444,0.000026485679,0.075092986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992908,0.00090303906,0.00013077779,0.00061987183,0.0032387313,0.0021994878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942872,0.0021246085,0.00024094549,0.00032367115,0.0017681768,0.0012553333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039900034,0.00027310936,0.00039479742,0.0008048445,0.015593431,0.008386086,0.0035822454,0.007969886,0.0032493363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011247944,0.000426725,0.00037791237,0.00066613546,0.014362712,0.0020830045,0.0033629986,0.009849043,0.00030091743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004066543,0.000042275802,0.004475709,0.000032431883,0.000012342445,0.00080314366,0.011580389,0.00026030652,0.0006199272,0.9313837,0.033455838,0.017293256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017661958,0.00017426068,0.036608323,0.0007755788,0.00015185913,0.0008241924,0.041437797,0.0023704525,0.0025439905,0.20793511,0.7067113,0.0002904914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9104777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96566117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0895223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027166283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06861985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19710612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124342262","doi":"","title":"Cohabitation, Female Sacrifice, and Judge-Made Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Doctrine; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Family law; Diversity (politics); Sign (mathematics); Joint venture; Sociology; Economics; Law; Political science; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.01631193196255434,"score_gpt":0.3038730338164975,"score_spread":0.2875611018539432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124342262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9023925,0.00040574966,0.0006468673,0.0024601736,0.000043882686,0.000022846141,0.000015761017,0.000003389971,0.09400885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99829525,0.00005210794,0.000041431067,0.00015724059,0.000011812382,0.0000038357566,0.0000032513337,0.0000015858178,0.0014335937],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950197,0.002011478,0.00013728243,0.0004664403,0.0012471173,0.0011180175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98243356,0.010298711,0.003180261,0.0008597688,0.0018125194,0.0014152538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005070767,0.00013188884,0.00021426352,0.00096334954,0.0065578683,0.0035084647,0.00060507003,0.0010277177,0.0073225186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031031184,0.00011232971,0.00014320509,0.0007861318,0.013463505,0.0026583755,0.0042799963,0.002688241,0.00024448932],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026913872,0.00038885404,0.17383218,0.0001102819,0.000054282827,0.0030838475,0.4296076,0.00030138655,0.0020542657,0.3329571,0.0035553696,0.053785812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046030567,0.0003626096,0.3481681,0.0002912915,0.00005776429,0.0015710014,0.49363777,0.0009559524,0.0027305132,0.09785516,0.054219298,0.00010437551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014462858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028807512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014462858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021556919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002168735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028757334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124358061","doi":"","title":"Charter Eviction: Litigating Out of House and Home","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Appeal; Eviction; Political science; Law; Justiciability; Politics","score_opus":0.04433295916700379,"score_gpt":0.30364303676954574,"score_spread":0.25931007760254193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124358061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24153072,0.0033823445,0.0076924125,0.09212453,0.0014108649,0.00015441378,0.00013594505,0.00011290734,0.65345585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91192,0.00079121784,0.0009886376,0.030735385,0.00023123831,0.00005275155,0.000039376268,0.000036948204,0.0552045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99184084,0.0019256024,0.00014460484,0.00063804595,0.0019876354,0.0034632625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973304,0.0014403232,0.00012924297,0.00017474136,0.00062132714,0.00030392193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005404508,0.0004112249,0.0004990601,0.00079334306,0.026318347,0.0073803156,0.0026541853,0.011315637,0.002801172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0105247,0.0003859657,0.0006722247,0.0007788126,0.020050276,0.003021847,0.0044762543,0.012289419,0.00026721953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030561656,0.0000495944,0.0028846806,0.000034717003,0.000021345202,0.003933821,0.04953041,0.00046951548,0.0004930708,0.8832657,0.04894295,0.010343619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011428939,0.00010152107,0.010878512,0.00057872967,0.00019192346,0.0020299356,0.123874485,0.0032708053,0.00385098,0.18702985,0.6678501,0.0002288118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.791042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83957976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20895803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0260388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051412452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4203772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124484187","doi":"","title":"Take My Breath Away: Competing Contexts Between Domestic Violence, Kink and The Criminal Justice System in <em>R. v. J.A.</em>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Criminology; Domestic violence; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law; Medical emergency; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.1815345443461385,"score_gpt":0.5164602354876578,"score_spread":0.3349256911415194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124484187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46643907,0.011939423,0.0021258178,0.2238937,0.0010513986,0.000083575,0.00006348139,0.000021139856,0.29438245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709043,0.001113052,0.00024785646,0.021479383,0.00019791602,0.00003938724,0.000010386328,0.000023869254,0.005983883],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852556,0.010058503,0.00017419698,0.00090344675,0.0010413902,0.0025668072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99506265,0.0032982565,0.00040464397,0.00015338368,0.00041532566,0.0006657922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074041705,0.0003591541,0.00071291905,0.0015527273,0.055862106,0.023050603,0.0024347687,0.011490127,0.0035434128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010736235,0.00053221383,0.0005024466,0.0013856811,0.06033694,0.013535078,0.014697217,0.015729459,0.00035878827],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029996492,0.00003064184,0.0017334077,0.000047987953,0.000009037227,0.0018261971,0.5384319,0.00006040349,0.00014639387,0.44588193,0.007842187,0.003960028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021252248,0.00003236288,0.0028372526,0.0005127182,0.000021580212,0.0005314917,0.8496808,0.000120369004,0.00021873534,0.072321326,0.073635206,0.000067018635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14553772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2625921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14553772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020208461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010942219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2893812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124569377","doi":"","title":"Draft Provincial/Territorial Legislation to Implement a Regulatory Framework for Medically-Assisted Dying Consistent with Carter v. Canada (Attorney General) 2015 SCC 5 and the Final Report of the Provincial-Territorial Expert Advisory Group on Physician-","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Supreme court; Assisted suicide; Political science; Charter; Government (linguistics); Declaration; Medicine","score_opus":0.03715265987870416,"score_gpt":0.31907066024407077,"score_spread":0.28191800036536663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124569377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029718995,0.00479316,0.025333209,0.14218134,0.004196411,0.0060055084,0.006967934,0.0014916175,0.7793119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36818415,0.003614689,0.10020609,0.1250559,0.000885576,0.0031242052,0.004718912,0.0005352631,0.39367518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95783997,0.0038366523,0.0019534572,0.002229019,0.024621554,0.009519315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.947164,0.0068055457,0.0012928484,0.0020860687,0.038554408,0.004097242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021677671,0.00062284665,0.00076306716,0.0030208272,0.0151543375,0.012415614,0.0057274057,0.010242369,0.007812051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042524293,0.001549458,0.0014162975,0.0030255946,0.007307017,0.0022197806,0.0036283457,0.009429896,0.0023582836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042504435,0.00010653135,0.0025285636,0.00027239972,0.00002024354,0.00046489816,0.008460251,0.001754309,0.0017949089,0.5488641,0.41099748,0.024693819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007599387,0.00004546829,0.008850706,0.0007537994,0.000046131838,0.00014393458,0.0033002535,0.0013679524,0.001124963,0.014368285,0.969736,0.00018651439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9778702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9860006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12995952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12995952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.47163826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94292676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124598818","doi":"","title":"The Forgotten Right: Section 9 of The Charter, Its Purpose and Meaning","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Charter; Supreme court; Section (typography); Constitutional right; Framing (construction); State (computer science); Political science; Meaning (existential); Original meaning; Sociology; Law and economics; History; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032436442371785404,"score_gpt":0.2770326792193331,"score_spread":0.24459623684754772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124598818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15609382,0.008013297,0.05700562,0.1294442,0.0024351696,0.0001339185,0.00021634827,0.00014800952,0.64650965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96352834,0.00128231,0.0061591365,0.006878402,0.0004043384,0.000070715156,0.00005999606,0.00005523376,0.021561487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923464,0.0028913657,0.00033481608,0.0010416822,0.0021191544,0.0012665296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951787,0.0026948156,0.00046667882,0.00055354304,0.00079936173,0.00030691974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009243924,0.00026250447,0.00041105758,0.0006878059,0.0070632533,0.010300762,0.0014691917,0.0041546216,0.0013985577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011634342,0.00029694632,0.00036862792,0.00071756326,0.04827226,0.005053454,0.0041549653,0.008096586,0.00027755767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054741186,0.0000024399403,0.00016088663,0.000006761027,5.5174183e-7,0.000038847815,0.0044025676,0.000047248508,0.00008370618,0.992187,0.0012335995,0.0018308394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022317967,0.00005902362,0.002959096,0.0005099339,0.000017376444,0.00024431312,0.012646401,0.00054496713,0.0010033015,0.66715246,0.3147729,0.00006783464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09390819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07249039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9060918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011278871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022916295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18672317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124668454","doi":"","title":"Competence Concerns in Charter Adjudication: Countering the Anti-Poverty Incompetence Argument","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Adjudication; Competence (human resources); Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law and economics; Poverty; Law; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.013681653245047724,"score_gpt":0.2786062817851604,"score_spread":0.26492462854011267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124668454","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18548535,0.0038547553,0.060399756,0.20738247,0.00092802057,0.0003257232,0.00005498794,0.00016760116,0.5414014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97086865,0.00074092974,0.0053551295,0.0114284605,0.00025702978,0.00005540585,0.00001226211,0.000022260107,0.011259876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94547415,0.021325277,0.0013029964,0.0039776415,0.019342875,0.008577084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9442445,0.034579556,0.004659892,0.0032445434,0.011043453,0.0022280936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038686547,0.0005235915,0.0006171801,0.0034917255,0.022157058,0.017353624,0.003817033,0.015834872,0.002836384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09314874,0.0005493459,0.0007189024,0.0023842382,0.05168114,0.011440153,0.012482896,0.014855831,0.00032782205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011169165,0.000014097673,0.0006344607,0.000030655436,0.000005220474,0.00029806278,0.009495837,0.00037127832,0.0002751217,0.97754854,0.003543293,0.007772244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013451645,0.00010017331,0.007171724,0.0006047026,0.00009859883,0.00069968036,0.018316498,0.0064848177,0.0035126072,0.65106004,0.31156552,0.000251164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37173566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45371002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37173566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037428543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062111232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73914385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W312471071","doi":"","title":"Viscount Haldane: 'The Wicked Step-Father of the Canadian Constitution'","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Genealogy; History; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07270786214310568,"score_gpt":0.28891590494566244,"score_spread":0.21620804280255676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W312471071","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0100742765,0.04109,0.00072090526,0.8356403,0.01803546,0.000044235363,0.0001832154,0.00006495738,0.09414662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28889617,0.020778129,0.0015518083,0.38118774,0.0036577233,0.00007873446,0.00009322561,0.00036150767,0.30339482],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962972,0.0009813791,0.000076139855,0.00043662166,0.0009237878,0.0012849361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966079,0.0011987641,0.00014501995,0.00009051658,0.0010553078,0.0009024537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034684683,0.0008013475,0.00068566645,0.0010185703,0.03535093,0.008482114,0.0023686714,0.010807049,0.008418039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010388961,0.00058548973,0.0003450637,0.0016006426,0.021124052,0.005220252,0.003060779,0.02038702,0.0011115649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003096713,0.000014253312,0.00044479227,0.0000679349,0.000008362733,0.00057514495,0.054858137,0.00009774075,0.00012905865,0.19780947,0.7350127,0.010951447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010419077,0.000005468838,0.0011768838,0.00019423629,0.000008084878,0.00018811616,0.04028652,0.000056415796,0.00015739487,0.010380323,0.94746953,0.00006663241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96603495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.985352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04017402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04017402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08503445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2914843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124744549","doi":"","title":"Bedford, Substantive Rationality, and Participatory Democracy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Supreme court; Legislation; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Democracy; Substantive due process; Proportionality (law); Arbitrariness; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.14809269231020933,"score_gpt":0.3561527374694569,"score_spread":0.2080600451592476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124744549","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03925701,0.008175138,0.028493023,0.10775665,0.00047941165,0.000115294635,0.00010203098,0.000067471876,0.81555396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9401076,0.0014980732,0.0063045053,0.011305349,0.00020199644,0.00018448375,0.00003729239,0.00003553839,0.040325195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98600775,0.006983897,0.00029066482,0.0013252052,0.0026679023,0.0027245462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917129,0.0056591975,0.000538571,0.00085903006,0.00081812247,0.000412198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011534896,0.00045239824,0.00064125535,0.0012567873,0.016277187,0.009866249,0.0018714073,0.006631959,0.003958243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012367774,0.0004591096,0.00064468046,0.0016122052,0.07777622,0.0053188936,0.0063251057,0.008499336,0.00040776064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014149629,0.0000018185194,0.000036429614,0.000004013823,6.3258074e-7,0.000012921807,0.00088515313,0.000057022873,0.000012755111,0.9976829,0.0006328713,0.00067205133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012820629,0.0000046257555,0.0003103146,0.000056282875,0.00000415942,0.000022945002,0.0009947958,0.00021934473,0.00009661801,0.9659076,0.032361392,0.000009177323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28409374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29939038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28409374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02726159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03197432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56488025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124782918","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2005.11427598","title":"Same-Sex Marriage in Canada: Contributions from the Courts, the Executive and Parliament","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"King s Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Law; Executive power; Politics","score_opus":0.01852019212539352,"score_gpt":0.2783188882033739,"score_spread":0.2597986960779804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124782918","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11079456,0.08537258,0.0005964572,0.5421194,0.0029381537,0.00006953279,0.0004991073,0.000041352378,0.25756887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8616889,0.03774337,0.00062892406,0.060891505,0.0012992736,0.000033098204,0.00017362689,0.00005469559,0.037486523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888998,0.0014090268,0.00022984427,0.000538153,0.004692856,0.004230248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778692,0.006331566,0.00075449905,0.00032390247,0.009925278,0.0047955015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008896244,0.00041757463,0.0007535848,0.004055817,0.040229954,0.017989537,0.0026300424,0.007670305,0.005003699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019552886,0.0006825549,0.00039876637,0.0074963165,0.013845322,0.002737395,0.0039224452,0.007815364,0.0002963626],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010404352,0.00011277266,0.02111779,0.000568406,0.00009531605,0.0012104994,0.076793015,0.0009928334,0.0005148154,0.50484866,0.29794252,0.09569926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049484,0.000026566566,0.061203763,0.0015234131,0.00016659142,0.00021538926,0.066151425,0.0011377701,0.0004986495,0.025772454,0.8430255,0.00022900992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99588853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99819654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25159654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25159654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40623522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86804193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124802196","doi":"","title":"Substantive Equality As Equal Recognition: A New Theory of Section 15 of the Charter","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.13256272786081788,"score_gpt":0.34198915064985225,"score_spread":0.20942642278903437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124802196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015903033,0.0033024873,0.122518964,0.033308603,0.0013987771,0.000121650024,0.00012946478,0.0000880811,0.823229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91667277,0.0019649104,0.020420913,0.01075282,0.0010890258,0.0002507986,0.0001343208,0.0000910537,0.048623357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.985529,0.0045649493,0.00033507755,0.0017604162,0.0050241216,0.0027865323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950054,0.002122608,0.00047639472,0.0006046277,0.0013973538,0.00039358324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009141877,0.0007055185,0.00079573976,0.0028713525,0.009121766,0.013395766,0.003254457,0.0056683035,0.006072518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009238318,0.0003968823,0.0011448141,0.0022389903,0.06711605,0.010949339,0.005510306,0.010805561,0.00073530443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.619573e-7,0.0000011846192,0.000022755037,0.0000023945124,4.3512716e-7,0.0000056742815,0.0003930764,0.000044379904,0.0000067228107,0.9986738,0.00030661118,0.0005421139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009245032,0.000009993184,0.00021465855,0.00006835924,0.000006842985,0.000036230715,0.0006195901,0.00054408633,0.00008471151,0.94971895,0.04867009,0.000017282966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23191352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15964404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23191352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030664844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03788365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46112722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124809449","doi":"","title":"Adding Social Condition to the Canadian Human Rights Act","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Charter; Political science; Disadvantage; Fundamental rights; Cultural rights; Social rights; International human rights law; Law; Social equality; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03630720792482259,"score_gpt":0.3577099511207186,"score_spread":0.321402743195896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124809449","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0079202885,0.01453552,0.006274238,0.23741013,0.009625349,0.0005665586,0.0015481337,0.00023945558,0.7218803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35696274,0.023409538,0.037064303,0.26347408,0.003882074,0.0010184458,0.0022152062,0.00031889643,0.31165472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9480622,0.0075062136,0.0021260325,0.0028393457,0.030796759,0.008669485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95585454,0.009528978,0.001106535,0.0028075683,0.027223693,0.0034787075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019553833,0.00078398315,0.0007246413,0.0063090497,0.020718772,0.012716816,0.0030765322,0.009207638,0.008056758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04552497,0.00075487857,0.0011014668,0.0047940887,0.018293513,0.0058788885,0.0068996446,0.010747435,0.0014829972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021115255,0.000017789342,0.0013074232,0.0001912551,0.000013702206,0.00023223669,0.006846045,0.00028852132,0.00030593268,0.7587699,0.19922177,0.032784157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015706642,0.0000120956365,0.0038960867,0.00049959635,0.00002812022,0.00006105078,0.0019089616,0.00019720555,0.00016178812,0.017261688,0.97586614,0.00009148809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9743446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98292255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10179886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10179886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3518417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73860586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124959456","doi":"","title":"A v B and Attorney General of Quebec (Eric v Lola) —The Implications for Cohabiting Couples Outside Quebec","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Supreme court; Legislature; Law; Order (exchange); Sociology; Poverty; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.05099248566382994,"score_gpt":0.30064280178728814,"score_spread":0.2496503161234582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124959456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2844845,0.010158387,0.001270653,0.24727434,0.0014990268,0.00013038851,0.0005185091,0.00004261749,0.45462155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86901295,0.0018981971,0.00037927082,0.067224994,0.00019027454,0.00004344689,0.00008222737,0.00001617412,0.06115246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573046,0.00064706,0.0000705168,0.0003587175,0.00078961323,0.0024036781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99530387,0.0013692306,0.00027102366,0.00016275064,0.0014754678,0.0014175957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034982087,0.00022992854,0.00027276325,0.000636469,0.024768298,0.006101774,0.0018347751,0.0069445185,0.00791475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063842232,0.000332499,0.00047395707,0.000809413,0.0071783126,0.0015655935,0.0021626358,0.005777762,0.0003674452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001416676,0.00014419608,0.07787361,0.00012862952,0.0000607272,0.004945918,0.021158896,0.00072716305,0.0012142822,0.6165071,0.2201343,0.05696351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013935803,0.00019501311,0.18247637,0.0010367674,0.00018871008,0.002113878,0.08534758,0.001621074,0.0016973092,0.029820738,0.69503725,0.00032590324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9870083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9943553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041745737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041745737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08077352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30288792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125003764","doi":"","title":"Legal Rights in the Supreme Court of Canada in 2000: Seeing the Big Picture","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Human rights; Political science; Context (archaeology); Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Linguistic rights; Right to property; History","score_opus":0.017563461483308174,"score_gpt":0.26078445572653575,"score_spread":0.24322099424322757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125003764","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055913534,0.071999595,0.0011106336,0.61101294,0.002373754,0.00005422284,0.0016248736,0.000110908884,0.25579953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75152045,0.046134852,0.0018917776,0.14055295,0.0013702024,0.00007493668,0.001046947,0.00015565864,0.057252202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863849,0.00092897186,0.00019575807,0.00095032324,0.0058559417,0.005684077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826068,0.0035829816,0.00076776906,0.00037396135,0.007706213,0.00496208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063314233,0.0005402896,0.00070400967,0.005985962,0.034544982,0.026450409,0.0036913408,0.012367379,0.00951842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023004245,0.0009348276,0.0008083848,0.009256313,0.02005468,0.008404612,0.00566444,0.014884653,0.00054840895],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058782578,0.000056932317,0.008161368,0.00017098068,0.00004964929,0.0006756291,0.015566393,0.00069143914,0.00026170214,0.61732894,0.30018425,0.05679382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048275266,0.000018478278,0.032244958,0.0012415372,0.00007196918,0.00015386038,0.026069118,0.00077851873,0.00038427423,0.07310792,0.8656506,0.00023053783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26751885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26751885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3104534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8495743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125049935","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1036","title":"Harsh, Perhaps Even Misguided: Developments in Law, 2002","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Plaintiff; Charter; Political science; Limelight; Sociology; Law and economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.06384175180557475,"score_gpt":0.3442274930813688,"score_spread":0.2803857412757941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125049935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0078667095,0.047774915,0.00074010354,0.43510038,0.0033601779,0.000049652368,0.00024521627,0.00011907883,0.5047437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1917494,0.02312116,0.0016752131,0.22900021,0.002080558,0.000092811104,0.00019402431,0.00008886563,0.5519978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667126,0.0005845668,0.0001114876,0.00050486124,0.0014295272,0.00069840084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99697816,0.00074597704,0.00021945871,0.00012843736,0.0013134732,0.00061441393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041588577,0.00034310267,0.00025266447,0.0012042152,0.014929755,0.01794424,0.002003318,0.013561507,0.010345621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00604081,0.0005532322,0.0003106437,0.0016848528,0.016179979,0.005038616,0.0024016225,0.011132176,0.0015043082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010668674,0.00004480825,0.00061555585,0.0000667331,0.0000029709217,0.0003209382,0.0034369626,0.00012632717,0.0002455306,0.6183351,0.35304743,0.023746861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044422045,0.0000089160985,0.001319138,0.00027033134,0.000002637998,0.000070537295,0.0015601341,0.000084503605,0.00008269413,0.010033645,0.98654836,0.00001464978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7379156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84939414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7379156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.074452996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06279851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54019684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125063584","doi":"","title":"Re)Examining Feminism and Justice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Feminism; Law; Counterpoint; Law enforcement; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.05745934905511848,"score_gpt":0.3113638327382411,"score_spread":0.25390448368312263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125063584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025182273,0.047493618,0.0025957003,0.11326085,0.0014553375,0.00002464624,0.00021473752,0.00004114068,0.80973166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7569622,0.013596864,0.0011073897,0.016330538,0.0013768749,0.00006910627,0.00009574072,0.00009926498,0.21036212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981881,0.00088181265,0.000025617768,0.00018768715,0.0002552657,0.0004615402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929845,0.00035485244,0.00006402624,0.00006987212,0.00012141451,0.00009144776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014749715,0.00046011526,0.00023480783,0.0011461132,0.008899982,0.005449559,0.000978173,0.0024991122,0.008849103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017412042,0.00014555552,0.0002434015,0.0012837767,0.0334577,0.0037668701,0.0036303853,0.002680106,0.0009174891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068995187,0.000004058533,0.00047589137,0.00007276938,0.0000024873893,0.000110288434,0.04630561,0.000050703973,0.000075360666,0.9131218,0.030238107,0.00953608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027024464,0.00000676107,0.0016661356,0.0003031629,0.0000031401294,0.00010071165,0.031100878,0.00005399994,0.00012834363,0.07912052,0.8875069,0.0000067205124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22325253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33973783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22325253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024612699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007173366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44390613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125224730","doi":"10.22145/flr.41.1.6","title":"Considering Canadian Approaches to Equality in the Context of Constitutional Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Law; Project commissioning; High Court; Political science; Publishing; Racism; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.16254608544722277,"score_gpt":0.33825860967231586,"score_spread":0.1757125242250931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125224730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11014769,0.031234805,0.0017040274,0.36441204,0.002207353,0.00018925295,0.00024942684,0.000055675566,0.4897998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90890807,0.00969965,0.0023380616,0.03528448,0.00041697948,0.000089825706,0.00007342773,0.0000250186,0.043164562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795131,0.0052801166,0.0005180669,0.001189081,0.0052806833,0.008218908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824676,0.007483348,0.0005369065,0.0006247477,0.006383421,0.0025039243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019785427,0.00042109514,0.0009543616,0.0041984147,0.030882474,0.017082458,0.003971266,0.009216913,0.006300676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019307284,0.00041003138,0.00081510766,0.004560062,0.027404232,0.0042493986,0.006156953,0.009853582,0.00023706815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030611245,0.000023828696,0.0010948178,0.00017483038,0.00002238409,0.00045316335,0.035563197,0.000446666,0.00028763365,0.9296656,0.017722134,0.014515139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006150269,0.00010039506,0.01866304,0.0015590994,0.00019510335,0.00028718277,0.12825663,0.001017058,0.0007905296,0.11733615,0.7313719,0.00036142656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98616934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17670277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17670277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26571295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9549081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125264773","doi":"","title":"Book Review: The Best Interests of Children – An Evidence Based Approach, by Paul Millar","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Best interests; Best practice; Child custody; Law; Psychology; Field (mathematics); Law and economics; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.0625249847080316,"score_gpt":0.2801570086249995,"score_spread":0.2176320239169679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125264773","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005664381,0.9036339,0.00016846012,0.071515724,0.021134967,0.000049132897,0.00014029724,0.000012667638,0.0032881678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001184078,0.9347176,0.00050007657,0.03856006,0.018061569,0.0001266494,0.00016062254,0.000029856279,0.0066594677],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930802,0.002509655,0.0010232859,0.00044545485,0.0027525339,0.00018884477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96362257,0.026082447,0.0022794763,0.00048257917,0.0064863516,0.0010466368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008466837,0.0011641568,0.002976818,0.006089072,0.0012796706,0.006245928,0.002599073,0.0053492985,0.006444108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04094563,0.001184751,0.000805309,0.00816895,0.003565088,0.006008438,0.001561327,0.0082945,0.0038912594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001302301,0.000010249669,0.000059080165,0.0021503784,0.000030032943,0.000030350991,0.00006939498,0.00004714092,0.00001946476,0.0019579951,0.9708327,0.02478021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004056624,0.00003304636,0.0007340083,0.019551,0.00006679828,0.0003339919,0.00023752029,0.00007398135,0.000047276182,0.0035912497,0.9752632,0.000027451528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019055031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043706417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019055031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058701085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012361218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044777453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125564700","doi":"","title":"Feminist Statutory Interpretation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Legislation; Doctrine; Law; Scholarship; Sociology; Power (physics); Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009597327491365826,"score_gpt":0.29312935903935594,"score_spread":0.2835320315479901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125564700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005965365,0.0075168675,0.0073975027,0.12665991,0.0033915476,0.00006636839,0.00042920696,0.00009930453,0.8484739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54129755,0.008641932,0.005698064,0.051189482,0.0032538439,0.00030702725,0.00050993863,0.0003678012,0.38873428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864443,0.0050841607,0.00031726406,0.0012800999,0.005159807,0.0017143963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99185795,0.0047257286,0.0003074216,0.00050948776,0.0023152626,0.00028415586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0096852835,0.00052137754,0.000410396,0.002569626,0.017719924,0.00914401,0.0017508168,0.00392189,0.0065987897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015090888,0.00031290864,0.0004137316,0.0029207144,0.036554415,0.00431393,0.0033160641,0.007450989,0.0013376494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037479515,0.000003044829,0.00012285047,0.000024450577,9.4342477e-7,0.000050683742,0.015238243,0.00004384527,0.000052226384,0.9100483,0.06783409,0.006577524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020426442,0.0000032114226,0.00047658163,0.00022787607,0.0000024732667,0.000046233617,0.00923679,0.00008570719,0.00019276614,0.07973845,0.9099744,0.00001352721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23939802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30968046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23939802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03565409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028686976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47600913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125683914","doi":"","title":"The Liability of Churches for the Historical Sexual Assault of Children by Priests","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Law; Supreme court; Liability; Damages; Political science; Meaning (existential); Test (biology); Tort; Psychology","score_opus":0.01356057908044708,"score_gpt":0.2825025342638002,"score_spread":0.2689419551833531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125683914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7570649,0.0025228139,0.00082110945,0.015705338,0.00019984652,0.00004696653,0.00009098146,0.000014454085,0.22353372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99013186,0.00039724534,0.00015519766,0.0013976104,0.000054309665,0.000010950162,0.000013132177,0.000002411417,0.007837233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974687,0.000739821,0.00012242855,0.00019629682,0.00058392744,0.0008888144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732935,0.0010293637,0.00038057685,0.00033390784,0.00042588334,0.0005009155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025390876,0.00014161956,0.0002203123,0.0007301818,0.0058992817,0.0026104518,0.001055806,0.0044652056,0.0034654534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009230404,0.00036782515,0.0004706734,0.00022726231,0.008163434,0.0016420215,0.0033329069,0.0052122404,0.00035375025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027571386,0.00017120907,0.09407376,0.00014510994,0.00010277096,0.015727421,0.05350501,0.00076247903,0.0039118663,0.7748666,0.016977102,0.03948104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002352547,0.0011517305,0.34147924,0.002591772,0.00045466045,0.038691185,0.08366401,0.0030866885,0.010017814,0.1547102,0.36348134,0.00043613222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.075972736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13402401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075972736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027944352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043216525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15106106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125688282","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1303","title":"Law, Politics and Legacy Building at the McLachlin Court in 2014","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Trilogy; Law; Politics; Political science; Charter; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.07072506130949477,"score_gpt":0.3600675183671795,"score_spread":0.2893424570576847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125688282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16452812,0.24773131,0.0009279924,0.16559367,0.004448414,0.00011207381,0.0002483722,0.000043912936,0.4163661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8287828,0.055934925,0.0006145486,0.039301246,0.0011971865,0.00011578386,0.00014092676,0.00004517333,0.07386751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99462104,0.0018453797,0.0001933516,0.0006600531,0.0017560723,0.0009240437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952118,0.0025363753,0.00046358476,0.00017033314,0.0009643912,0.0006534309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006869654,0.00016294385,0.00038779265,0.002661676,0.013836009,0.015029573,0.0013291112,0.004620202,0.0028845132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012048346,0.00043952442,0.00026013757,0.0039812527,0.012358587,0.0056509334,0.004091803,0.0059928293,0.0003562185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002896624,0.000053783795,0.004078204,0.00026776665,0.000020046618,0.0006187877,0.025552992,0.00022185003,0.00030076582,0.85590637,0.066244096,0.046706405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012520912,0.000054592063,0.016810657,0.0013856043,0.000023923312,0.00028874713,0.024167707,0.00007973442,0.0006633268,0.032894924,0.9235535,0.000064646374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12642817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26997176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8735718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025702635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023164555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25138456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125751861","doi":"","title":"Between Exclusion and Assimilation: Experimentalizing Multiculturalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Multiculturalism; Reasonable accommodation; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Charter; Democracy; Law; Law and economics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028144978977897868,"score_gpt":0.33536194300898814,"score_spread":0.3072169640310903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125751861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.654181,0.001136151,0.016167339,0.018137354,0.00033587302,0.00021488502,0.000023929477,0.000042683725,0.3097608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952533,0.00018630376,0.0015877573,0.0007269913,0.00004167184,0.00017928623,0.0000055958994,0.00001169616,0.0020073794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9782718,0.018456532,0.00020494651,0.0010711438,0.0010241806,0.000971525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742261,0.020258328,0.001536164,0.0025041702,0.0006520844,0.00082315993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020129295,0.0004554385,0.0006820845,0.0012490626,0.011186509,0.008024768,0.0024386412,0.0020428689,0.0041735033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018812733,0.0003285918,0.0005463632,0.0009800727,0.085975476,0.008076644,0.019994194,0.0043020914,0.00017164435],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011067056,0.00031602575,0.0011277259,0.00006891701,0.000010697285,0.00013732672,0.120746605,0.00023235616,0.0006594072,0.8696323,0.0003775136,0.0065804776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023434272,0.00049793266,0.0020843928,0.00025733587,0.00003463607,0.00015027742,0.12152771,0.001489377,0.0020334173,0.83254117,0.039099656,0.00004981419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004713396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005174327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020129295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006437474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005015229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10645515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125797368","doi":"","title":"An Eye for an Eye: Proportionality as a Moral Principle of Punishment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Retributive justice; Punishment (psychology); Imprisonment; Criminal law; Law; Relevance (law); Morality; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Social psychology; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.04405367806710336,"score_gpt":0.3764380836767383,"score_spread":0.33238440560963495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125797368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053680398,0.012751003,0.06581748,0.1336913,0.0015671478,0.000046727393,0.00008926789,0.000106470856,0.7322502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9176619,0.0038349428,0.009183219,0.012962684,0.001161937,0.00006263748,0.000031721676,0.000118789474,0.054982245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965197,0.0017975703,0.00006899833,0.00029433682,0.0008659361,0.00045351754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777204,0.0010808005,0.00020416405,0.00024725584,0.00053245947,0.00016326006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029360836,0.00030069548,0.0003433612,0.0008696628,0.0055192104,0.0064678392,0.0011382592,0.0022789845,0.0026973446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007872851,0.00017141899,0.00033126443,0.00087296625,0.033879057,0.0065266844,0.0037728802,0.0062533193,0.00041593862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044918215,0.0000037279162,0.00012354774,0.000009721536,0.0000012760419,0.000029081495,0.0028069154,0.000055198034,0.00005957969,0.98997355,0.0024129522,0.004519982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065435943,0.000019887422,0.0009011758,0.000067342604,0.000005033682,0.000096690215,0.002660263,0.00043528317,0.00019534754,0.9089706,0.08662388,0.00001794309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04692244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052094746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04692244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008109521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006188578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09329867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125934409","doi":"","title":"The Sexual Assault of Intoxicated Women","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sexual assault; Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); Criminal law; Criminology; Law; Psychiatry; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Medical emergency; History","score_opus":0.018651733011753623,"score_gpt":0.293926267794353,"score_spread":0.2752745347825994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125934409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91854143,0.0032528907,0.00038669302,0.013766568,0.00025972284,0.000047515245,0.00015019282,0.000014289703,0.06358077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97557086,0.0025062733,0.00011844212,0.0021399444,0.000042288502,0.000007688466,0.000033468466,0.000006134833,0.019574838],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901986,0.00018199375,0.00002674126,0.000056106444,0.00031889428,0.00039630377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992095,0.00020259563,0.00018276006,0.00003589905,0.0001980836,0.00017112587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047102012,0.00020380478,0.00021255552,0.0007530438,0.012868247,0.0021033918,0.0005582096,0.0014399018,0.004561766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002192974,0.00020986328,0.0001982995,0.0011102124,0.005977224,0.0006974343,0.0022960117,0.0020463297,0.00020752108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014452937,0.00009477193,0.16399352,0.00026436488,0.000035719015,0.009692483,0.6414505,0.00049854093,0.0031202687,0.09599295,0.01943404,0.06527822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014688927,0.00012816438,0.179221,0.00058844703,0.000051351602,0.004227064,0.5692709,0.0004196575,0.0013403622,0.002917809,0.24171783,0.00010279712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92785406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9670496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92785406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015574344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022073893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1451416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125955803","doi":"","title":"Calculations of Conscience: The Costs and Benefits of Religious and Conscientious Freedom","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Charter; Supreme court; Religious freedom; Law; Freedom of religion; Relation (database); Freedom of thought; Conscientious objector; Political science; Sociology; Human rights; Computer science; Economic freedom","score_opus":0.022717429053566416,"score_gpt":0.27709970866239647,"score_spread":0.25438227960883003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125955803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1572768,0.008169013,0.06557165,0.044785574,0.0007482975,0.0003562559,0.00045318544,0.00009229932,0.72254694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862024,0.0010806051,0.004269443,0.0012078715,0.00016681929,0.00006389116,0.000057043868,0.000023656396,0.006928303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866087,0.005316117,0.00028035938,0.00047538162,0.006234681,0.0010847297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9728908,0.020676745,0.0012419518,0.0023934066,0.0022090324,0.00058796967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076895505,0.0006320869,0.00064246537,0.0026189014,0.0025534567,0.0060376558,0.0019028744,0.0028752377,0.007874255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04379574,0.00037915318,0.0010447899,0.0017145943,0.01334004,0.005896237,0.004069166,0.0050138608,0.00031581544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008055386,0.000043428165,0.002398243,0.000063916705,0.000036093763,0.000112685346,0.0003852508,0.0062149446,0.0001275517,0.9620142,0.0017264369,0.02679659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006498203,0.00009467786,0.008775277,0.00036622962,0.000112845126,0.00023389727,0.001022416,0.011827438,0.00050245906,0.9458817,0.031036736,0.000081214515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062767565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08185873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062767565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013312572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011321368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12480444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126142249","doi":"","title":"Une Procédure en Difficulté: A Blueprint for Resolving 'Special' Education Disputes Through a Quasi-Inquisitorial Administrative Process","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Adversarial system; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Blueprint; Special education; Commonwealth; Mediation; Political science; Administrative law; Psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.2628247367807611,"score_gpt":0.5846679448692832,"score_spread":0.32184320808852207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126142249","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003837954,0.002305847,0.565563,0.30249894,0.0060896794,0.0013713093,0.00005306308,0.00075311866,0.117527135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22642477,0.0024120554,0.5571742,0.123153694,0.0052581867,0.00559663,0.000113824375,0.0009789175,0.07888768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.74050343,0.18151125,0.010562265,0.016190318,0.044146035,0.007086785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79110616,0.14546005,0.006147796,0.036067877,0.015671626,0.005546512],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.25882664,0.0012570459,0.0015963597,0.0035781343,0.020170249,0.031009726,0.008474406,0.029436234,0.0061008832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19567324,0.0017994856,0.0026906556,0.0019272941,0.13012792,0.043452688,0.02572635,0.050195232,0.00450419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055691794,0.00002409671,0.000058962978,0.000032255724,0.0000030228064,0.00005206994,0.005010907,0.00011074025,0.00008444856,0.97776616,0.01049329,0.0063584168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006113221,0.00007419592,0.00017427924,0.00047040248,0.000008933854,0.00023912187,0.0037158001,0.0011087861,0.00038480465,0.65065235,0.3430113,0.000098809614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006314577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053278473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25882664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010917491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060094997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9139987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127111541","doi":"","title":"Book Review: John Borrows, Law's Indigenous Ethics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.025796070960167356,"score_gpt":0.3155913606505387,"score_spread":0.2897952896903714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127111541","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005184764,0.8683502,0.00011185898,0.089269444,0.024609981,0.000020791822,0.00016870642,0.000024118246,0.01739306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015116292,0.80714935,0.00026431933,0.06989589,0.020692993,0.000073914765,0.00027665365,0.000063779305,0.100071386],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845076,0.00023761882,0.00008078962,0.00012401896,0.0010116242,0.000095230665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951749,0.0020104635,0.00023260455,0.000107254265,0.0021220322,0.00035274352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001709159,0.0009630926,0.0016453116,0.0039920695,0.0023167194,0.0040952787,0.0023110316,0.005058875,0.022728378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008379043,0.0007116124,0.0005577716,0.008078142,0.0034285663,0.0042382753,0.0017265223,0.0064867144,0.011506549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002137581,0.0000024185565,0.000011947362,0.00027086344,0.0000025526904,0.00000831128,0.000033980188,0.000019192947,0.0000069935686,0.0014827972,0.98699147,0.011167333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044210437,0.0000023977066,0.00015825928,0.001104601,0.000004225664,0.000046187506,0.00005225725,0.000008753058,0.000005843614,0.0011483787,0.9974591,0.000005654682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12831457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26774377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12831457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00825686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016739711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25513536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128234126","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3280409","title":"When Does Childhood End? Post-Separation Support for Adult Children in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Separation (statistics); Psychology; Developmental psychology; Demographic economics; Economics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0056077552034546636,"score_gpt":0.2654909371882308,"score_spread":0.2598831819847761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128234126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761019,0.0027786084,0.000040561732,0.009317919,0.00011313274,0.00005085558,0.0017419922,0.0000064307433,0.009848595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99310136,0.0018366451,0.000117174706,0.0008427376,0.0000217211,0.000028482851,0.0006372541,0.000008137703,0.0034064536],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972439,0.00014052932,0.000094135175,0.00016249875,0.00041393278,0.0019449602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914569,0.00037023044,0.00091191265,0.00008409106,0.002251297,0.0049255453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009697506,0.000191959,0.00060063973,0.0011443556,0.010594149,0.0036231985,0.0022937614,0.0011895774,0.004899209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005050537,0.00038103067,0.00050081825,0.0035003603,0.0015457107,0.0011499681,0.0028129725,0.003311154,0.00025741107],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003243228,0.00037136747,0.8787386,0.00021511104,0.000075419244,0.0013355389,0.05460994,0.00020297432,0.00020372948,0.005072082,0.022381177,0.03646975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003325281,0.0000724761,0.85695106,0.0006503404,0.000046759516,0.00028123966,0.12724145,0.00018546716,0.000106580024,0.00033909068,0.014037517,0.00005469411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9964141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08130248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08130248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16172417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5898935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129657180","doi":"","title":"Reference re Racine v Woods","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Jurisdiction; Metis; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.043805283115543554,"score_gpt":0.325533374529897,"score_spread":0.28172809141435345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129657180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037973977,0.01742087,0.001406781,0.44794914,0.029849283,0.00011308476,0.0003514424,0.00024055575,0.4988714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.063029684,0.0047052936,0.0013944601,0.46942547,0.003787811,0.00012127665,0.00014886445,0.00023463034,0.45715246],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98611045,0.0015350984,0.00037661172,0.0022747568,0.006959398,0.0027436253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939917,0.0012427496,0.00015439835,0.0003135311,0.0036948896,0.00060276996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004589773,0.0007124477,0.0006150711,0.0011576915,0.02248309,0.009204403,0.0033585522,0.015198459,0.013301821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017094536,0.0006159595,0.0009183078,0.0011758277,0.010029053,0.004535341,0.0027368471,0.022041595,0.003200134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001195123,0.0000064430005,0.00017452592,0.00004155297,0.0000055476603,0.00020459955,0.0037064077,0.000053848,0.00017823413,0.1696825,0.81740576,0.008528527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037630068,0.000004679209,0.0003131479,0.0001807228,0.000007025236,0.00007792497,0.0018983041,0.00003713296,0.00012989766,0.0041666357,0.99315083,0.000029898125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87540466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9244521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.124595344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08310548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25065815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130041830","doi":"","title":"Supreme Court of Canada Cases Strengthen Argument for Municipal Obligation to Discharge Duty to Consult: Time to Put Neskonlith to Rest","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Treaty; Indigenous; Argument (complex analysis); Duty; Obligation; Political science; Government (linguistics); Rest (music); Abandonment (legal); High Court","score_opus":0.01687734587924641,"score_gpt":0.28399899034345016,"score_spread":0.2671216444642038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130041830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07797679,0.0019754572,0.0019286342,0.27970037,0.001066458,0.00012895734,0.000640649,0.000119620076,0.6364631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6668749,0.0013023185,0.0016048616,0.19128774,0.00052487286,0.00014082615,0.00024550234,0.00010347589,0.13791554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886109,0.001094961,0.00035121967,0.0011169416,0.0035801695,0.0052457023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98669446,0.00490053,0.00056004885,0.0007008821,0.0049274173,0.0022166034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054353997,0.00043155684,0.00072799524,0.0014113332,0.03561865,0.013582776,0.0041002682,0.024192035,0.011007153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023254145,0.0008643986,0.00083933276,0.0022661788,0.013455225,0.004025127,0.0053328,0.01975992,0.0012729682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004988529,0.000044650365,0.004163712,0.00005711043,0.00003378654,0.0012584226,0.008992894,0.00039141637,0.00038154153,0.8129286,0.16606511,0.0056327903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019876895,0.00004187907,0.01607373,0.0007703978,0.00023741774,0.0005017151,0.023374746,0.0019453618,0.0012240657,0.10771737,0.84765077,0.00026377244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96467465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98380685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06440439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06440439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16235535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46728873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130405249","doi":"","title":"“Public Apologies and Canada’s Indigenous Relations”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of historical studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Sociology; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.14684145410298635,"score_gpt":0.31605604219057054,"score_spread":0.1692145880875842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130405249","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3609221,0.004279803,0.00068065757,0.13052401,0.00082381093,0.0000633846,0.00023829087,0.000054597076,0.50241345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.910312,0.0008055515,0.00017342558,0.007257237,0.00009326425,0.000012268295,0.000027941594,0.000034201672,0.08128406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950192,0.0006463388,0.0000885923,0.00040019304,0.0011469141,0.002698726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909367,0.0027904068,0.00060921296,0.00035964118,0.00321888,0.0020851896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034239418,0.00027109333,0.000348519,0.001979813,0.05465338,0.0139891505,0.0026728916,0.006244581,0.016900457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01384945,0.00037939215,0.00031739895,0.0030400036,0.026304608,0.004033943,0.0051167454,0.010339817,0.0005500695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068764384,0.00006303738,0.007790499,0.00006923891,0.000018174982,0.0009568286,0.2393159,0.0001505977,0.00024042706,0.6636149,0.0674135,0.020298142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035282825,0.000020079882,0.021610435,0.00027209712,0.00004008127,0.00039439008,0.24211161,0.00032409345,0.00053223653,0.02320869,0.7113455,0.000105513114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9901327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99601704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13245949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13245949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18799081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96106535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130544707","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3586","title":"Towards an Account of Linguistic Equality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Indigenous; Economic Justice; Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Section (typography); Linguistics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.07077240674340862,"score_gpt":0.37388678763235916,"score_spread":0.30311438088895054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130544707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021427808,0.0057427487,0.02487265,0.048838917,0.00034618628,0.000049579077,0.00014387505,0.000058016692,0.89852023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91917247,0.0030994196,0.011945722,0.006841541,0.00038626717,0.000112424466,0.00012691838,0.000066872155,0.058248382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963793,0.0011523503,0.00008088231,0.00038231447,0.0010576962,0.0009473751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986632,0.0004798609,0.000107032945,0.0001404127,0.00042835643,0.00018121103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031709278,0.0005535492,0.0005871117,0.002347516,0.0131723415,0.008890818,0.002129366,0.003160225,0.0056320997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028083257,0.0002472515,0.0005446697,0.0022777955,0.042549923,0.008576946,0.005344085,0.0056201,0.00047892865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.231798e-7,0.0000016722645,0.0000464279,0.0000052381483,4.3263097e-7,0.0000122280335,0.0012518486,0.00007741095,0.000011374663,0.99720937,0.0005303057,0.00085292244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035167616,0.000002692856,0.00037629882,0.000045046156,0.0000036161082,0.000021634003,0.0027076802,0.00054004585,0.000043564654,0.95460093,0.041646477,0.000008515625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4057367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3781615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4057367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029460417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020895109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8067501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130641001","doi":"10.32396/usurj.v7i1.496","title":"The Historic and Contemporary Permanence of the Doctrine of Discovery in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"USURJ University of Saskatchewan Undergraduate Research Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Doctrine; Indigenous; Governmentality; Legitimacy; Law; Colonialism; Notice; Political science; Legislation; Sociology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.0414054743082365,"score_gpt":0.28524377282499486,"score_spread":0.24383829851675837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130641001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20451614,0.017351706,0.005986156,0.21141934,0.0012107281,0.00007148349,0.000246102,0.00012034291,0.559078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9509631,0.0038815252,0.0013699933,0.00725032,0.00007987507,0.000023681136,0.000032242944,0.000041582465,0.036357664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924419,0.0009809149,0.00015587323,0.000795427,0.003236436,0.0023893896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99228185,0.0026705423,0.00039319284,0.0003962744,0.003171299,0.0010868299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049997787,0.00022561094,0.00042610226,0.001444797,0.037529774,0.012103938,0.0019329304,0.0037379586,0.0028344307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01133372,0.0004210835,0.0003364301,0.0029086594,0.044438742,0.0033794828,0.0046689413,0.00742197,0.00015486243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032919055,0.000009633119,0.0017742459,0.000045186414,0.000008104568,0.0003036861,0.035380255,0.0003361853,0.00027702056,0.9335143,0.012876261,0.015442116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032623644,0.000034570134,0.013144383,0.00036389253,0.000040391922,0.00031757742,0.04847847,0.001532039,0.0014633094,0.12066943,0.81367505,0.000248307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9937057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99544215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22145791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22145791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29658112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90299845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133456921","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3579","title":"Potential Aboriginal Rights-holders: Canada and Cultural Communities versus Indigenous Peoples and Socio-political Bodies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Indigenous rights; Supreme court; Multiculturalism; Politics; Democracy; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.025003954641458763,"score_gpt":0.3035963335604575,"score_spread":0.27859237891899874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133456921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40391973,0.007599666,0.001490306,0.08211738,0.00020672301,0.00008905031,0.000109022876,0.000014951448,0.5044532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851953,0.0013380527,0.00032593193,0.0020999983,0.000023612367,0.000012155428,0.000015921225,0.000007037981,0.010981956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99499136,0.0008438572,0.00006494642,0.0003340279,0.0013046492,0.00246119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966966,0.0011131573,0.00026308128,0.00011437625,0.00073266344,0.0010802712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041010547,0.00028785213,0.00043544063,0.0016750251,0.03391935,0.0109316455,0.0019011237,0.0033520495,0.004134691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006674569,0.00024828856,0.0002709285,0.0024835414,0.04035901,0.0048214276,0.0069407187,0.004356945,0.00014991271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001441029,0.000016442007,0.0047597243,0.000040266306,0.0000057137445,0.00040105445,0.15127109,0.00009430534,0.000166262,0.83050394,0.0032381406,0.009488551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003313918,0.00004181796,0.036807723,0.00093793165,0.000074622265,0.0004982764,0.5754964,0.0009142044,0.00047707997,0.19931895,0.18525638,0.00014352617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97348684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98615116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06278385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06278385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09994004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45553088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133915360","doi":"","title":"The Deification of Process in Canada’s Duty to Consult: Tsleil-Waututh Nation v Canada (Attorney General)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Duty; Law; Indigenous; Political science; Articulation (sociology); Process (computing); Computer science","score_opus":0.03486071137276479,"score_gpt":0.2785298110444996,"score_spread":0.2436690996717348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133915360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3243645,0.008100766,0.007953089,0.20631346,0.000742777,0.00025662454,0.00026788533,0.00013000201,0.45187083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92548776,0.0015073135,0.0023454328,0.03533078,0.000063489955,0.00007327978,0.000059825245,0.000040804196,0.035091437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98203236,0.0027674565,0.0004705654,0.0011445759,0.007454698,0.0061302194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99190885,0.0036575275,0.00034680002,0.00027887218,0.0026031255,0.0012047963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077927047,0.00026446924,0.000341042,0.0010497565,0.034614902,0.011400025,0.003059819,0.008333615,0.0025419635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014123011,0.0005998276,0.0004628219,0.00150445,0.016270505,0.002693425,0.0052590785,0.009120387,0.00018185246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046531997,0.00003387416,0.0063087465,0.00013204657,0.000022812499,0.0021764084,0.091902785,0.000856959,0.001488116,0.83781815,0.036827073,0.022386603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010838658,0.000085822416,0.030040942,0.00082934677,0.0001356724,0.0011998945,0.105604656,0.0029270644,0.0030605083,0.060935084,0.79460096,0.00047173214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98933417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9938415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10221655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10221655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23484187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74163646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135466910","doi":"","title":"Sudden Death: Deconstructing the Justice Minister's Approach to Medical Aid in Dying Following Canada's 2015 Federal Election","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Government (linguistics); Politics; Charter; Bill of rights; Economic Justice; Legislation; Constitutional right; Constitution","score_opus":0.016876749337513947,"score_gpt":0.3002807358628491,"score_spread":0.28340398652533516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135466910","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058338918,0.008323308,0.0044838,0.63035685,0.0072332025,0.00015261145,0.0001398969,0.0001473373,0.2908241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8286808,0.0033188239,0.002027495,0.1201921,0.0012525796,0.00007478342,0.00007530056,0.0002024644,0.044175666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97750455,0.007884729,0.00046668536,0.0011656564,0.0036093653,0.009369055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980568,0.0070634317,0.0006197633,0.00052147266,0.0049951184,0.006232319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018467607,0.0007609265,0.0007915285,0.0031763674,0.08865838,0.030000698,0.0059160558,0.016238512,0.0056448844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035755705,0.0009259833,0.0010433292,0.0021804587,0.0654479,0.006602761,0.015323736,0.036154628,0.0007022564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006090185,0.000046003493,0.0023121533,0.00010135058,0.000032414482,0.001080543,0.20201345,0.00060358417,0.00015166255,0.65712595,0.122584,0.013888018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060558265,0.000047739883,0.004454084,0.00091931346,0.000071468465,0.00029494567,0.22402962,0.00096994184,0.0002322915,0.09691728,0.67172945,0.00027333768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9548353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.986553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20843205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20843205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29144722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9181066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135600008","doi":"10.7202/1075514ar","title":"Unwritten Constitutional Principles: The Challenge of Reconciling Political and Legal Constitutionalisms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law; Constitutional review; Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06804872899419606,"score_gpt":0.31988490502979905,"score_spread":0.251836176035603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135600008","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026740324,0.032271788,0.076581255,0.54158044,0.0024977152,0.00008842746,0.00011830285,0.000098043216,0.32002363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8847131,0.008940655,0.03133023,0.04987793,0.0035510818,0.00032356917,0.0000892129,0.0002052657,0.020968964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95021605,0.032681342,0.0012005664,0.004094482,0.008868456,0.0029390536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95925564,0.02892074,0.0023699924,0.0048418194,0.0031850582,0.0014268031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056287933,0.0006308152,0.0014251432,0.0027066232,0.01024747,0.016719004,0.003956756,0.012385679,0.0030529988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061617162,0.000714207,0.00081064686,0.0025598295,0.10982884,0.026524799,0.010699778,0.021475576,0.00050690066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017824798,0.0000031968693,0.00002468198,0.000008601095,0.0000017972069,0.000013093283,0.0012243097,0.000069090675,0.000014963555,0.9952923,0.0014134431,0.0019328026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006343527,0.0000042026554,0.00006203139,0.000053866934,0.000002025362,0.000021656751,0.0008408076,0.00012405137,0.000028540333,0.97973204,0.019116782,0.000007650615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009683651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011888684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056287933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011813047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019378453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29768258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138532977","doi":"","title":"The (Near) Death of Duress","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Pleading; Variety (cybernetics); Law; Flexibility (engineering); Political science; Section (typography); Criminal code; Law and economics; Criminal law; Business; Supreme court; Sociology; Computer science; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.03130431486674794,"score_gpt":0.32180838053788857,"score_spread":0.2905040656711406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138532977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23046125,0.0042440984,0.0061440812,0.020109585,0.00072887144,0.00004687576,0.00026937167,0.000049691178,0.7379462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96532804,0.0008877726,0.00044947112,0.0039942055,0.00022196559,0.000022917899,0.000066627974,0.000014369214,0.029014643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742895,0.0006251487,0.00010594381,0.0003739518,0.000673015,0.00079303345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972072,0.0007985222,0.000526679,0.00046406087,0.00048028905,0.00052332797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022456024,0.00016181466,0.00033399032,0.0006176161,0.004199011,0.0036679145,0.0006563494,0.0019801173,0.003902704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008727944,0.00016656937,0.00026197595,0.00036750216,0.010830197,0.0030224419,0.003382629,0.004217594,0.00041974493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025147203,0.000010643661,0.0057596075,0.00003813063,0.000008968017,0.0006732286,0.013055502,0.00013795593,0.00035684794,0.9551256,0.007436776,0.017371705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002820547,0.00014898497,0.06115577,0.0009315523,0.00006553261,0.0055962265,0.026364874,0.0006924683,0.0013428439,0.28724632,0.61630577,0.00012152821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055797763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09997123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055797763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003842752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005389916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11094594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138558795","doi":"10.1017/9781316591482","title":"The Disabled Contract: Severe Intellectual Disability, Justice and Morality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Economic Justice; Rationality; Realm; Politics; Sociology; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Social contract; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.04473649516898875,"score_gpt":0.3279078894391676,"score_spread":0.28317139427017884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138558795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008902448,0.021279624,0.0020356034,0.022436025,0.0005447113,0.00003445468,0.000045651086,0.000018694902,0.94470286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5324037,0.024567587,0.0017127403,0.007864056,0.0012956768,0.0001190729,0.000120848534,0.000047733545,0.43186864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935097,0.00025295667,0.000013470601,0.00003788791,0.00023617697,0.00010859619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947435,0.00025278726,0.000043868182,0.0000369803,0.00006272493,0.0001294278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000897959,0.0003008222,0.00019534642,0.00084294355,0.0025517812,0.0044215485,0.000525373,0.0016162166,0.004855615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016085667,0.00010200276,0.00015186351,0.00100579,0.014641376,0.0029499736,0.0027318283,0.002339931,0.0006881715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003717242,0.000013435389,0.0001987,0.000022182836,0.0000010174874,0.000115883326,0.004212314,0.00009146011,0.000026941405,0.9519477,0.026195142,0.017171603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061246983,0.000015450429,0.0014355516,0.00025534123,0.0000024073506,0.00046544286,0.0050465823,0.00019984151,0.000049297956,0.51581806,0.47669762,0.000008281857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012276599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017616408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012276599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00392522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004318489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028479576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139266291","doi":"","title":"The Limits of Local Authority Over Recreational Cannabis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Cannabis; Legalization; Legislation; Recreation; Statutory law; Business; Local government; Scope (computer science); Local authority; Local community; Effects of cannabis; Public administration; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03605802892774972,"score_gpt":0.3366977229642282,"score_spread":0.30063969403647844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139266291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4452364,0.0026058482,0.0027369855,0.025129853,0.0000762276,0.00006960143,0.00019298444,0.000063819934,0.5238883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887489,0.00030114138,0.0002517587,0.0007719323,0.000017179877,0.000017223942,0.000027481969,0.000013752227,0.009850569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903886,0.003416993,0.0004148482,0.0010677614,0.0023487785,0.002363023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855285,0.005104576,0.001349769,0.0014121803,0.004221914,0.002382978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077381185,0.00014808396,0.0004261486,0.0015159098,0.010501943,0.008683781,0.0018367881,0.0013010014,0.011554401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016066553,0.00044972272,0.00044491104,0.0013012028,0.019513624,0.004569212,0.00981914,0.0026731815,0.00096169795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001938018,0.000101834594,0.025277834,0.00030106687,0.000057115973,0.001153634,0.13510212,0.00071802194,0.0022554705,0.77407444,0.010002184,0.050762396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010967281,0.00027343223,0.09965586,0.0019253991,0.00017181298,0.0012936679,0.29607156,0.0014730608,0.0018988795,0.16872893,0.4280657,0.00033200483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23899451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3631988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23899451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014314703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017264131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4752068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140549940","doi":"10.25071/2563-3694.6","title":"On the One Time I Lost My Virginity, and the Three Times I Gave It Away","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Sociology Journal of Critical Praxis","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virginity test; Revelation; Psychology; Gender studies; Sociology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.05681116233828342,"score_gpt":0.34301546651326276,"score_spread":0.28620430417497933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140549940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21547325,0.009060882,0.025545107,0.06601419,0.011102285,0.00019814767,0.00022105625,0.0002711213,0.6721139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79433584,0.0028827898,0.004025273,0.00707295,0.00094235514,0.00012347354,0.00007408416,0.00017516306,0.1903681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990563,0.0005165457,0.000015598354,0.00009324792,0.0001678645,0.00015047967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991216,0.00033328,0.00010386564,0.00008466295,0.00011174848,0.00024489718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000970471,0.00053034065,0.00027370628,0.00043367324,0.006896663,0.004212356,0.0007081085,0.0018557397,0.0049539646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039623776,0.0001677402,0.00031411168,0.00028061253,0.018862644,0.004153446,0.0035180869,0.0064670886,0.0013780718],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012035412,0.00005276458,0.0013148548,0.00013610168,0.000010308319,0.0018093339,0.37577927,0.00010589496,0.0016576754,0.547016,0.045691382,0.026305975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008650009,0.000156291,0.0011617143,0.00044908663,0.000007121671,0.0033327583,0.1927924,0.00019242425,0.0012574071,0.030435,0.7701587,0.00004840081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016719995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030951442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006896663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011938517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010902788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016572595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3143797967","doi":"10.1111/mlr.2006.69.issue-4","title":"Constitutional Rights and Social Welfare: A Comment on the Canadian Chaoulli Health Care Decision","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Charter; Political science; Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Health care; Judicial deference; Judicial review; Social security; Social rights; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.011955574813297636,"score_gpt":0.21892104661762354,"score_spread":0.2069654718043259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3143797967","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064598084,0.0063150763,0.0004261809,0.90424895,0.0028795963,0.000048491966,0.00029180903,0.000045134355,0.07928495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.090186134,0.0030035449,0.0006139076,0.8551655,0.0031413306,0.000083811,0.000111449954,0.000077378674,0.047616985],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98727906,0.001379663,0.0003265992,0.0012992742,0.00506277,0.004652572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863375,0.008194041,0.00043695362,0.0003600015,0.003212305,0.0014592776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011623589,0.0010245929,0.0013239156,0.0020513292,0.04267855,0.015272749,0.007305589,0.056773707,0.0069417274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020060837,0.0011629176,0.0017308523,0.0038862757,0.025942015,0.004156773,0.0031352828,0.03460743,0.0009904376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006146299,0.000027253496,0.001115787,0.000087024164,0.00002553158,0.00071817334,0.006790172,0.0003602675,0.00030631042,0.407794,0.57643634,0.006277655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014240325,0.000030723055,0.0043789875,0.00057044777,0.00012068998,0.00021688818,0.0084286295,0.0007517113,0.00060086,0.04415189,0.94033456,0.00027228947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.976193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98565996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12758733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12758733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14039813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9257152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3145048401","doi":"10.1017/9781316591482","title":"The Disabled Contract","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Rationality; Economic Justice; Sociology; Politics; Morality; Social contract; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Face (sociological concept); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.028241657407926404,"score_gpt":0.24958177607201523,"score_spread":0.22134011866408881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3145048401","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001993433,0.0031068868,0.0017033818,0.0056697144,0.0002788422,0.000023959095,0.000082669634,0.000020166923,0.9871209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17349552,0.005976082,0.0013139108,0.0051659206,0.00042570918,0.00014992557,0.00018776818,0.000072463816,0.8132128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845827,0.0005141769,0.000050316827,0.0001776664,0.0004778182,0.00032183566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991905,0.000281558,0.000060712362,0.00016219061,0.00013304692,0.00017200434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013751443,0.0004875733,0.0002746633,0.0013805552,0.0044531757,0.0065937405,0.00090534694,0.0028924525,0.034297485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031418037,0.0002092034,0.00029002808,0.0013422257,0.010669228,0.0044838698,0.0045054085,0.0026395456,0.0058133584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045816555,0.00000602769,0.000078437704,0.000012975793,7.9170366e-7,0.00005020022,0.00077305303,0.000034835408,0.00002088902,0.96902186,0.021271951,0.008724394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052436344,0.0000065747768,0.00019095522,0.00010511891,0.0000021518538,0.00027228406,0.00075311394,0.00008040991,0.00006171494,0.1630289,0.8354893,0.0000042552538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0117385695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009899722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034297485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068161776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066528223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11473656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W314588749","doi":"","title":"Custody and Access Decision-Making and the Breastfeeding Child (Case Comment re Cavannah v. Johne)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Breastfeeding; Consistency (knowledge bases); Best interests; Inclusion (mineral); Medicine; Psychology; Law; Political science; Pediatrics; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.015971023200879463,"score_gpt":0.3298953897583531,"score_spread":0.31392436655747363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W314588749","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17448956,0.008753517,0.0016692786,0.44518772,0.0016140935,0.00016598182,0.00037127975,0.00006934305,0.3676792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65719175,0.002944232,0.0009626767,0.21444,0.0009372128,0.00016326802,0.000075846714,0.0000532377,0.12323173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960443,0.0006079334,0.0001414409,0.0004769467,0.0011156574,0.0016138038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707234,0.0016336457,0.00019306199,0.000102146485,0.00047598098,0.0005228352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003255377,0.0002550942,0.0003632251,0.00051276106,0.019240834,0.004665765,0.0020666323,0.02138464,0.004074609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008856576,0.00064293394,0.0006151174,0.00070280035,0.007999206,0.0016337725,0.0020497865,0.009727277,0.0004070024],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007842676,0.00006485941,0.0102913035,0.00013649906,0.00003114803,0.012187587,0.056048818,0.00044871838,0.0020336993,0.69047695,0.21766214,0.010539771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010883765,0.00010518711,0.0271557,0.0010870306,0.00019843933,0.0034155443,0.04669179,0.0012697228,0.0025425414,0.06321964,0.8539224,0.00028311167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76725113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88691705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76725113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017958134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0258037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46823913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146001282","doi":"10.1017/9781139236249","title":"A.V. Dicey and the Common Law Constitutional Tradition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Positive law; Venn diagram; Constitution; Philosophy of law; Common law; Philosophy; Power (physics); Rule of law; Public law; Political science; Constitutional law; Sovereignty; Sociology; Politics; Black letter law; Private law; Physics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03592682075332374,"score_gpt":0.23680674336547505,"score_spread":0.20087992261215132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3146001282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007146555,0.040641937,0.0022378631,0.01918026,0.00082993286,0.000025184281,0.000037457925,0.000028445525,0.92987233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56602144,0.03330643,0.0040670526,0.016530301,0.0014502539,0.00025730842,0.00011161677,0.0000947273,0.3781609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771726,0.0009857445,0.00005831043,0.00037677368,0.0005734707,0.0002884183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984792,0.0009813613,0.00008921725,0.0001650919,0.00017032275,0.000114767165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018209049,0.00033554216,0.000463725,0.0018148179,0.008200148,0.007044841,0.0007545423,0.0028796226,0.0045020026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005308825,0.0002800379,0.0002096145,0.0025284295,0.021426406,0.006820023,0.002810625,0.0045389878,0.00063858257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015328152,0.0000018038891,0.000029598285,0.000009909959,4.0913426e-7,0.000015388652,0.0014463927,0.00002340879,0.000010269849,0.9894497,0.006191858,0.002819826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006253657,0.000010562456,0.00035617212,0.00021801789,0.0000022390582,0.00009037042,0.001598704,0.00012143714,0.000055538512,0.30166757,0.6958642,0.000008942953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02453022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031179193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02453022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010200405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075317137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07400954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3147790050","doi":"","title":"Confronting Violence Against Women - A Brief Guide to International Human Rights Law for Canadian Advocates","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; International human rights law; Law; Political science; Right to property; Linguistic rights; International law; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Fundamental rights; Public international law","score_opus":0.009403434427572159,"score_gpt":0.2977142710669516,"score_spread":0.28831083663937945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3147790050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012637845,0.10407792,0.0035842895,0.1395728,0.01025704,0.0010763651,0.0027259698,0.00045142896,0.7369904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020623537,0.21166469,0.012719131,0.061057586,0.0036221626,0.00086329953,0.0038206126,0.00041069576,0.6852184],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607193,0.00048156068,0.0002048771,0.00022012451,0.0020941135,0.0009274193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99645907,0.0008652717,0.00012632247,0.000114558134,0.0017431377,0.0006916908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037870116,0.0012750007,0.0009601992,0.00916261,0.017103208,0.010272553,0.0026651123,0.0066756727,0.057167288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006346158,0.0008079358,0.0007595059,0.013423633,0.00714098,0.005210811,0.0037424008,0.00550614,0.012002543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006560032,0.00004895027,0.00030262157,0.00031236003,0.0000022017234,0.00023600356,0.0038032944,0.00020549604,0.00014857837,0.08075743,0.82989764,0.08427887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015255097,0.000003010025,0.0003441268,0.00042225368,0.0000010504402,0.000049567258,0.0014606725,0.000023907794,0.000016927395,0.0030108695,0.99465466,0.000011469148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92104185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9627053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07895815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.073984474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13864173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5367974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148322179","doi":"","title":"Patriation and its consequences : constitution making in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"UBC Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutionalism; Politics; Federalism; Law; Constitutional law; Charter; Political science; Democracy; Sociology","score_opus":0.07906494785020259,"score_gpt":0.31065752163248356,"score_spread":0.23159257378228099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148322179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0886693,0.032791078,0.0013852636,0.14427078,0.001478107,0.00017945809,0.0010750678,0.000116373594,0.7300346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8285881,0.016461598,0.0015052971,0.012100593,0.00020541924,0.00006561268,0.00044167403,0.0000904648,0.14054123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924224,0.0006270022,0.00015632063,0.0005005648,0.003430112,0.00286357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994555,0.0012894304,0.00027486266,0.0002134281,0.0024855812,0.001181742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025760466,0.00035901682,0.0004199134,0.002412967,0.03367316,0.0148837855,0.0019999251,0.0032180622,0.010572439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012306366,0.0004943902,0.00039834218,0.007981487,0.01597514,0.0029395267,0.004083149,0.0059799897,0.00043678403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003187246,0.000041350948,0.006302928,0.00017702117,0.00001755124,0.0005947459,0.02267059,0.0014484863,0.00022314492,0.80298567,0.11165002,0.053856675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020382018,0.00001719933,0.031589426,0.00045713724,0.000024792274,0.0001217849,0.022826051,0.00096032233,0.00035511685,0.041383006,0.9021093,0.00013547637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99889153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30350053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.30350053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42116764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80784065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3149007528","doi":"10.1017/9781108955195.011","title":"Radical Title of the Crown and Aboriginal Title: North America 1763, New South Wales 1788, and New Zealand 1840","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Sovereignty; Indigenous; English law; Law; Irish; Welsh; Common law; Relevance (law); Feudalism; Political science; History; Genealogy; Archaeology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024675657364858623,"score_gpt":0.23688420226565035,"score_spread":0.21220854490079172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3149007528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75669044,0.013276713,0.00013616982,0.0044157733,0.0001862414,0.0000489767,0.0006805701,0.0000049616656,0.22456026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95939153,0.0042350707,0.00014322509,0.0008559162,0.00006350709,0.0000393712,0.00019495373,0.000011673642,0.03506478],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991436,0.000115386516,0.000034305092,0.0001267841,0.0002363127,0.00034364313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990657,0.0002150419,0.00022398769,0.0000375999,0.0002192318,0.00023836181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084478926,0.00016258596,0.0002774304,0.0015041055,0.0059333974,0.002241446,0.0007455105,0.0009903164,0.003562037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019480685,0.00024541674,0.00018743981,0.0026260454,0.0075231134,0.0021191945,0.0020283898,0.0024775113,0.00036922516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001594253,0.00006341421,0.0542624,0.00026888837,0.00004743213,0.0019749054,0.6576816,0.00014949664,0.0010231159,0.23134449,0.02104823,0.031976704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019904353,0.000044365817,0.49324873,0.0005670547,0.000039099526,0.0005283211,0.17297031,0.00007720524,0.00029539652,0.008842163,0.32330897,0.000058418686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87807995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9637051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12192005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021903679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013076076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2452761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3149680829","doi":"10.4324/9781003161387-14","title":"Not empty of laws","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0684219108686456,"score_gpt":0.32321634440810093,"score_spread":0.2547944335394553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3149680829","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029556109,0.00557848,0.0043198736,0.02289944,0.0009601103,0.000031019496,0.00014476488,0.00008753119,0.9630233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29646525,0.0082527725,0.0042977557,0.017359441,0.0008764457,0.00014307283,0.00035422604,0.0002826677,0.6719684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767286,0.00053434074,0.000053359265,0.0003887137,0.00093394105,0.0004167401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982596,0.00065553695,0.00007544533,0.00030114854,0.0005286196,0.00017960566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019270309,0.00046660472,0.0005309699,0.0011465538,0.011550046,0.009294421,0.0011454287,0.002389717,0.01788656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051057544,0.00031974848,0.00032552396,0.0015321771,0.03683182,0.009425171,0.0030838621,0.0061068046,0.003304845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.0137195e-7,0.0000011362051,0.000024770456,0.000007694363,4.6330734e-7,0.00001134799,0.0014597898,0.000015430041,0.000015441716,0.9888399,0.007834614,0.0017884761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002566343,0.0000036933527,0.00017265767,0.00009789977,0.0000023281425,0.00004473198,0.0023635656,0.0000879604,0.00006811471,0.2043119,0.79283863,0.0000058409832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27901626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35021764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27901626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019699816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02226953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5547844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152388838","doi":"","title":"Selling What No One Can Buy","year":2018,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Advertising; Marketing; Commerce; Computer science","score_opus":0.046543231532101006,"score_gpt":0.3809345777035893,"score_spread":0.3343913461714883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152388838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019954922,0.002395306,0.010206682,0.033368576,0.0005560568,0.000057850953,0.00013679244,0.00007982107,0.933244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7430212,0.0044500213,0.00655958,0.018096324,0.00054780487,0.00010567249,0.00023002412,0.00018962473,0.22679977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99672806,0.0009454824,0.00009649798,0.0005721622,0.0012578649,0.00039996978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996411,0.0017254199,0.0003787054,0.0006067321,0.0004492874,0.00042895108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032028488,0.00036707547,0.0005541859,0.0009661452,0.004908174,0.012793391,0.0010703936,0.0043985923,0.03824666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011190049,0.00037952815,0.00039356976,0.0010563461,0.014988347,0.015290236,0.0042821635,0.0041817515,0.007121105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001819292,0.000049585527,0.0008620635,0.000056114724,0.000017872711,0.00022540876,0.0041730623,0.00011150404,0.00023210645,0.96627474,0.013658656,0.014320723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002493177,0.00006543512,0.0008842432,0.00045517893,0.000026659161,0.00044322154,0.010074005,0.0006346434,0.0005030229,0.4831425,0.5036972,0.000048879905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057136826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059472844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03824666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002650555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003369039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1279478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153094520","doi":"","title":"Living Well Together: Understanding Treaties as Arguments to Share (L'esprit des Traités : le Traité comme Accord de partage)","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Indigenous; Possession (linguistics); Ethnology; Political science; Humanities; Land rights; Order (exchange); Negotiation; Geography; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.08319810951596532,"score_gpt":0.335933582618597,"score_spread":0.25273547310263167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153094520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018418213,0.005075128,0.019571252,0.042221025,0.00079176424,0.00007343073,0.000090811845,0.00006444445,0.91369396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8905392,0.0035049159,0.005364204,0.0047399914,0.001266406,0.00038339852,0.00014516903,0.00028481518,0.09377177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99347514,0.004133469,0.00017107853,0.0004787645,0.00080954755,0.0009318839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99572974,0.0027626453,0.00046126274,0.0003538014,0.00044848592,0.00024409979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00728037,0.0007643201,0.000539816,0.0026296047,0.013630232,0.018558277,0.002148571,0.008574664,0.011197238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010580782,0.0005166046,0.00083002803,0.004751742,0.03305483,0.02814439,0.008027999,0.008602533,0.001287758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020978828,0.0000028208894,0.000030457211,0.000007570374,9.4751266e-7,0.000032264474,0.0078016506,0.000047686073,0.000015709773,0.989947,0.0013370726,0.0007747529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018949415,0.000014523481,0.00041103634,0.0002727596,0.00001198046,0.000085196414,0.019731091,0.00058286404,0.00008683725,0.73281807,0.24594295,0.000023824081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027214892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019395404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9727851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016184479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053559346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11742717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154429129","doi":"","title":"A Gendered Approach to “Quality of Life” after Separation under the British Columbia Family Law Act Relocation Regime","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Guardian; Credibility; Family law; Quality (philosophy); Inclusion (mineral); Distancing; Political science; Family reunification; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Medicine; Immigration","score_opus":0.07373998263430484,"score_gpt":0.36689734390045337,"score_spread":0.29315736126614855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154429129","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2816767,0.25312018,0.001955133,0.0939091,0.0012268595,0.000119804456,0.00034358643,0.00001844559,0.36763012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92662126,0.055055145,0.0005319645,0.0072002094,0.00019727142,0.00007087353,0.000092524526,0.00000627605,0.01022443],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957616,0.0018446965,0.00014289981,0.00026957522,0.0013398551,0.00064140686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969994,0.001217295,0.00039308367,0.00010453565,0.0009480546,0.0003377493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032873843,0.00013384804,0.00024756146,0.0032743504,0.0046420246,0.0050153644,0.00095257873,0.001154025,0.0017559071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071580186,0.00012349957,0.00020177994,0.0030120069,0.013667694,0.0016830573,0.0025337143,0.00235315,0.00012184441],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007098391,0.00013049005,0.076304264,0.0010740675,0.000043724493,0.0015206251,0.14624819,0.0005565837,0.00043876187,0.30163285,0.030520175,0.4414593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011402766,0.00008584703,0.46379432,0.006688198,0.00006419304,0.0007513216,0.1488676,0.00028970905,0.00031556856,0.042817187,0.33622903,0.00008561656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7175093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8880266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28249067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030738419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03230782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5683086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154534422","doi":"10.29173/mlj915","title":"Section 31 of the Manitoba Act, 1870: A Land Claim Agreement","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Agreement; Philosophy; Linguistics; Business","score_opus":0.027217500358058443,"score_gpt":0.27274179694630635,"score_spread":0.2455242965882479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154534422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06380638,0.004330035,0.001682419,0.050263092,0.0017537721,0.0004815717,0.0029156688,0.00014077628,0.87462616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21745932,0.001983575,0.0030542067,0.057686195,0.0004328792,0.00049861404,0.0006968387,0.000055636807,0.7181328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969361,0.00037133502,0.00016850904,0.00030660938,0.0010803668,0.0011370461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976078,0.0005493859,0.00013730521,0.00014091887,0.0010745431,0.0004899276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003560411,0.000573825,0.00037680293,0.0010598666,0.011398457,0.0041779825,0.0022032473,0.008129787,0.013344019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055109933,0.00096117397,0.0004596822,0.0012745132,0.004476426,0.0009634657,0.0028249586,0.0046932907,0.003809918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008081065,0.00010598933,0.008516831,0.00014179735,0.000018678616,0.0017863166,0.015795287,0.00034808455,0.0016535608,0.6699305,0.29172456,0.009897625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038933136,0.000049224545,0.018862437,0.00037311047,0.000025698162,0.00033189435,0.0035944926,0.00023769328,0.00070444803,0.007103198,0.96862227,0.000056623612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83537155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9366561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16462845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021767136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09408546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3311959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154575014","doi":"","title":"Structural Cooperative Federalism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Constitution; Cooperative federalism; Constitutionalism; Dual federalism; Political science; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Law; New Federalism; Sociology; Democracy; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.018903588269553025,"score_gpt":0.30351273705761983,"score_spread":0.2846091487880668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154575014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021632053,0.0020411622,0.07192695,0.011342019,0.00025169092,0.00010571445,0.00016841067,0.00012785522,0.8924041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9477565,0.001469011,0.01345426,0.0019527316,0.00016851975,0.000142001,0.00015177375,0.000058215097,0.034846913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99334526,0.0011759878,0.00016009265,0.0011343291,0.0028234378,0.0013609547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971841,0.0006994083,0.0002090834,0.00053745654,0.0011624505,0.00020740586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056060688,0.00036452003,0.00047893554,0.0022805994,0.008067835,0.004636564,0.0018829186,0.0020858492,0.0064011184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007145146,0.0002760884,0.00066592224,0.0022054696,0.027579904,0.0035578809,0.004141531,0.0025680314,0.0006204655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.5062113e-7,5.5912415e-7,0.00003550307,0.000004697751,6.259159e-7,0.0000032964726,0.0002925447,0.000052639793,0.000013445419,0.9981652,0.0002893643,0.0011414615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011310414,0.000010504349,0.0007914368,0.00009756172,0.000014495697,0.000048669783,0.000631125,0.00079345907,0.00018958974,0.84029806,0.1570993,0.000014518678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33184558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32774305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33184558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033396643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030193225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65982807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155058604","doi":"10.82308/27594","title":"Recognition of common-law spousal relationships in Canadian family law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; University of Rwanda; Université du Québec à Montréal; United States Agency for International Development","keywords":"Law; Family law; Common law; Political science","score_opus":0.06196587599246816,"score_gpt":0.28058337373215475,"score_spread":0.21861749773968658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155058604","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45071512,0.009765455,0.0028087285,0.08252372,0.0006642287,0.00019838262,0.00026492102,0.00009906241,0.45296037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729021,0.002453442,0.0008564052,0.0043039606,0.000032504824,0.000023649274,0.000047920505,0.000013371872,0.019366771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945945,0.0007165253,0.00016431478,0.0003448667,0.0020519437,0.00212779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99366754,0.0010880613,0.00059220823,0.00028068907,0.0023520286,0.0020194703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003721746,0.0001935458,0.0002352596,0.0019019825,0.025132768,0.0050764834,0.0014340155,0.0020682437,0.0052394355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010999671,0.0003399479,0.0002844298,0.0024977801,0.010802295,0.001738721,0.004197948,0.0032052167,0.0001835429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003836987,0.00008528192,0.057698507,0.00022568913,0.000020103984,0.0023356976,0.19015583,0.00057180517,0.0015018453,0.5313918,0.05777014,0.15820491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001643912,0.00005189839,0.1594679,0.00064447906,0.00004124144,0.0012674187,0.16260862,0.0008818961,0.000732027,0.016050119,0.65803736,0.00020058297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9896135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09947955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09947955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17950846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72177804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155090396","doi":"10.21991/cf29415","title":"“This Charter applies…”: The Supreme Court of Canada’s Fundamental Error in the Trinity Western University decisions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University; Royal Society of Canada; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Battle; Academic freedom; Charter; Sociology; Higher education; History","score_opus":0.04662990985390994,"score_gpt":0.2854992316328855,"score_spread":0.23886932177897555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155090396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02446117,0.0054820827,0.0028695324,0.45670184,0.0044556395,0.00008630598,0.0004772785,0.00009658321,0.5053695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63057977,0.0024852569,0.0021778361,0.17093243,0.0019791666,0.0001160152,0.00023005143,0.00016347322,0.19133602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98993367,0.0016373806,0.00021590629,0.0011379747,0.0036835584,0.0033914763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907979,0.003489569,0.00030448218,0.00044612246,0.0038361403,0.0011258131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007977516,0.0003929995,0.000480885,0.0014007557,0.030683232,0.01616275,0.0034946483,0.013068281,0.008662942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023680998,0.00046445982,0.00047234516,0.0020867048,0.022805687,0.0036916707,0.0032111318,0.014266824,0.00079051545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011160612,0.000006346221,0.00045016853,0.000014114986,0.0000038646995,0.0001141055,0.003050061,0.00016578127,0.000042698015,0.8184947,0.17380872,0.0038383587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034561705,0.000011241568,0.002933039,0.0005395639,0.000030241052,0.00010492758,0.007800055,0.0014923395,0.00036349168,0.16882311,0.8177383,0.00012916457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9565748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9634156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077063926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.077063926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13514178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55914056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155556815","doi":"10.29173/alr2646","title":"The Alberta Court of Appeal's Vexatious Litigant Order Trilogy: Respecting Legislative Supremacy, Preserving Access to the Courts, and Hopefully Not to a Fault","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Jurisdiction; Statute; Political science; Statutory law; Economic Justice; Trilogy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04958079287243488,"score_gpt":0.37466570438959873,"score_spread":0.32508491151716384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155556815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08682361,0.047987994,0.0038200812,0.1613175,0.0036444482,0.00019016743,0.00023697299,0.0001968457,0.6957825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6844957,0.016391905,0.0041079526,0.08018198,0.0009439618,0.000084408326,0.0001624599,0.00008181767,0.21354987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99236816,0.0009206495,0.00021480865,0.00053170975,0.004303523,0.0016611231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99263245,0.003465521,0.00037521883,0.0003084208,0.0022222514,0.0009961083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070522632,0.00022773714,0.00041070796,0.0018628237,0.010944087,0.011736307,0.0024487225,0.0066150953,0.0040600123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014628331,0.00055551383,0.00041472787,0.0018649963,0.008020305,0.0018834576,0.0020320022,0.006983433,0.00052247377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000500645,0.00005764895,0.0038682388,0.00018387208,0.000032270877,0.0013182072,0.0048379344,0.0007517514,0.001061809,0.78246546,0.14877428,0.056598444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070954855,0.00008187559,0.02204997,0.0005333473,0.000122053854,0.0006079724,0.006586422,0.0009685434,0.0013745242,0.04335643,0.92406523,0.00018270944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86950475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9615311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9696168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030383253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.096499145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26252747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157224595","doi":"10.24908/iqurcp.8280","title":"The Rule of Law: The Role of Judicial Review in Promoting Human Rights and Social Reform","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Legislation; Politics; Judicial review; Jurisdiction; Civil liberties; Legislature; Human rights; Substantive due process; Proportionality (law); Constitution; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.10440225751580771,"score_gpt":0.40907251074767415,"score_spread":0.3046702532318664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157224595","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016756102,0.06471209,0.11454061,0.49485278,0.006071371,0.00057289534,0.00007579022,0.0004158407,0.30200255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81179327,0.025712796,0.042731937,0.08432636,0.012156243,0.0008094426,0.000046003555,0.00025945093,0.022164503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.82187754,0.12196609,0.006459793,0.010139124,0.032375973,0.0071814368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5822575,0.34692046,0.014973579,0.02162401,0.028982135,0.0052422737],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.19218998,0.0006053564,0.0015514998,0.0053179483,0.00955512,0.025808472,0.0038687587,0.014970483,0.0030424614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2619003,0.0010486086,0.0008527783,0.0034213965,0.058285754,0.017395997,0.007169031,0.012876202,0.0006944577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016916942,0.000040836465,0.0006489495,0.00020558956,0.000024531653,0.00012222426,0.0025369555,0.00094943866,0.00019711768,0.92101747,0.019876538,0.054363478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012995306,0.00015108222,0.0016229159,0.0015096988,0.0000556963,0.00019298204,0.0020073808,0.002988548,0.0007299459,0.7204793,0.27001247,0.00012012046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014615202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019610515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19218998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014273036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04887361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99617356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158761700","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3809777","title":"Indigenous Law and the Common Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Indigenous; Political science","score_opus":0.012246876931792813,"score_gpt":0.28393305057772517,"score_spread":0.27168617364593234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158761700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.113481954,0.0037057293,0.0028746158,0.03371404,0.00022890016,0.000040034225,0.000045681423,0.00002120847,0.84588796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737463,0.000576571,0.000524455,0.0016368052,0.00013034922,0.000025646561,0.000010507795,0.000012251863,0.023337107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99502254,0.0022126678,0.00012572408,0.00067520223,0.00069811085,0.0012657748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937955,0.0037334524,0.00046729055,0.0007160309,0.00064520974,0.00064254354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051332293,0.0002142903,0.0005259988,0.0016771188,0.014091053,0.009993986,0.0015879839,0.005431125,0.009658058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0101080965,0.00030158894,0.00033340047,0.0019804707,0.057461143,0.007834407,0.0056503844,0.006124334,0.00047469317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034836148,0.000011330397,0.00023086151,0.000008296756,0.0000017347164,0.000052259682,0.008463659,0.000025298235,0.000025130488,0.9889286,0.0007421637,0.0015071796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018039329,0.000025572586,0.002481455,0.00014804801,0.000017828075,0.00016696569,0.02682544,0.00032086362,0.00020807315,0.89205205,0.07770885,0.00002689978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09366996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1035238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09366996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075154663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012669565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18624943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159254874","doi":"","title":"Le calcul des aliments du parent de fait : de I'approche synchronique à I'approche étapiste (Calculating the Support Paid by a De Facto Parent: Moving from a Synchronic to a Layered Approach)","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.018191170605091646,"score_gpt":0.2700757212274938,"score_spread":0.25188455062240217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159254874","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06008414,0.00033676194,0.9297902,0.0004905542,0.00009154203,0.00012962655,0.0003344768,0.0015274038,0.007215217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41686094,0.00039173008,0.57364076,0.00012899458,0.00005987631,0.00021448707,0.0005470401,0.00037297068,0.007783183],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789655,0.00047531934,0.00011709069,0.0005122033,0.00076926325,0.00022954472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959126,0.0014756242,0.000397203,0.0007788417,0.0011883479,0.00024738227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028580895,0.0009607761,0.0007213847,0.0017422944,0.0009544597,0.004417212,0.002086254,0.0010644854,0.006435584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009865844,0.0006907363,0.0012798652,0.00209965,0.0011753086,0.0030395526,0.0025882833,0.001558803,0.0010759076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005445666,0.00014151382,0.035190307,0.00050243404,0.00027992256,0.0004910616,0.00284467,0.43568742,0.009553345,0.1421684,0.004932744,0.3676636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010001496,0.00016842723,0.009029212,0.00019912385,0.00018463725,0.00024920312,0.0010306246,0.8879963,0.012573882,0.052580737,0.035788827,0.0000990023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07647102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06514292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07647102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003225604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052585443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15205187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159890866","doi":"10.1017/cls.2020.24","title":"Pesky Polygamist Women: The Marginalization of Qualitative Data in British Columbia’s Charter Reference on Polygamy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Sociology; Supreme court; Sovereignty; Neutrality; Gender studies; Politics","score_opus":0.05389865457521155,"score_gpt":0.3255047132759811,"score_spread":0.27160605870076954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159890866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9182611,0.0026689235,0.00553195,0.03864206,0.00020368487,0.00028851835,0.0003575064,0.00003481133,0.03401138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99275756,0.00062015123,0.00070646586,0.0026625409,0.00001732345,0.00020732319,0.00005503334,0.000036994814,0.002936545],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9183991,0.062076844,0.0016976347,0.0030367402,0.008733868,0.0060557276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85690254,0.11141734,0.005834462,0.0049795336,0.01689099,0.00397512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07734617,0.00054413854,0.0012544433,0.006348835,0.03813284,0.017406002,0.0039922176,0.0029508083,0.004985273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.105975054,0.0011233039,0.0002993448,0.007771328,0.05802728,0.005780205,0.016120153,0.0050982796,0.00029051406],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014121156,0.000004514572,0.0015098687,0.00005249844,0.0000027988606,0.0001466871,0.9918459,0.000016853908,0.0001807813,0.0036552295,0.00050298317,0.0020677203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001591748,0.0000048356515,0.0026026673,0.0003007055,0.0000032854732,0.000043747197,0.9878122,0.0000625576,0.00010958071,0.0012003387,0.007842228,0.00001632118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84103435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.868617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15896565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.068661235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06407393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4981745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159972780","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Constitutionalism and Dispute Resolution Outside the Courts: An Invitation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Institution; Law; Indigenous rights; Political science; Liberalism; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Sociology; Human rights; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.02627497588717223,"score_gpt":0.299816302295311,"score_spread":0.2735413264081388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159972780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09130951,0.009042656,0.015440593,0.16553807,0.0005471955,0.00008517876,0.000051425217,0.000077108336,0.7179082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96542513,0.0016813787,0.0020231293,0.005840501,0.0002607953,0.000044103865,0.000012659393,0.00002364955,0.02468866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930347,0.0025317913,0.00012491843,0.00056349504,0.0018086814,0.0019364149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950643,0.0031097357,0.00024748454,0.00043834336,0.00078166404,0.00035843035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066130525,0.00020926804,0.00031609167,0.0010308577,0.015861282,0.01283326,0.0018456085,0.0047731036,0.0034369424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010960275,0.00025436922,0.00042367892,0.0014496386,0.0435376,0.0061822054,0.007051759,0.005225938,0.0002083941],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002816726,0.0000047845906,0.00019335127,0.000010452301,0.0000015782329,0.0000662616,0.009776137,0.000090121786,0.000061590785,0.985786,0.00118918,0.0028176734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040864074,0.000023216198,0.0025927182,0.00024521438,0.000032297332,0.00024475716,0.036029425,0.0014545663,0.00074182416,0.68325686,0.27528468,0.00005363987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62027943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68264866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62027943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031436577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05529088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76391363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160128850","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3441656","title":"Conceptual Parallels in Judicial and Bar 'Independence' in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Parallels; Independence (probability theory); Bar (unit); Law; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Geography; Statistics; Engineering; Meteorology; Operations management","score_opus":0.015396554402689071,"score_gpt":0.277543492225502,"score_spread":0.26214693782281295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160128850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32064828,0.0016786713,0.0041301535,0.034924123,0.00030028858,0.000096030366,0.00025444894,0.000055125092,0.6379128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98152107,0.00028703792,0.00045142637,0.0014515003,0.000030116611,0.000022993045,0.000039759194,0.000027972328,0.0161682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98470336,0.001837965,0.000362813,0.0011580138,0.0048447694,0.007093089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98203516,0.0058500543,0.00093209225,0.00063322304,0.006811936,0.0037375987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006863531,0.00046361715,0.0009410702,0.0046724463,0.054250967,0.023232337,0.0048262803,0.007260416,0.014412649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02488404,0.0007229563,0.0009421787,0.0071338573,0.050921198,0.006070584,0.008063944,0.013326151,0.0004909217],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020656344,0.000034903704,0.00323354,0.000020482072,0.000009607832,0.00012261185,0.04643252,0.00026074602,0.00008610111,0.9400556,0.00473102,0.004992261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014285522,0.00006174539,0.08262268,0.0006922318,0.00016917133,0.00027765747,0.28405145,0.00316526,0.00073299964,0.2855371,0.34216648,0.0003803891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99082947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99428326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19390853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19390853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26421198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93495184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160588698","doi":"10.21991/cf29420","title":"Intersections and Roads Untravelled: Sex and Family Status in Fraser v Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Equity (law); Statute; High Court; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.017120867982033924,"score_gpt":0.2631981880009177,"score_spread":0.24607732001888377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160588698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.274043,0.008920717,0.00064626354,0.26027408,0.0012122251,0.00018434993,0.0013818864,0.000054864387,0.45328254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8419381,0.0036525202,0.00041580154,0.08298362,0.00021881255,0.00007287657,0.00026753108,0.00006860029,0.07038228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99505675,0.0003595893,0.00009037147,0.00037219442,0.001615425,0.0025056703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954665,0.0010296765,0.00019142548,0.00014011173,0.0013220697,0.0018501973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002711569,0.00025696112,0.0004948871,0.0017048871,0.044830874,0.006780179,0.004065185,0.007554152,0.010920087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007371078,0.0005961739,0.00066655583,0.002764217,0.01133614,0.0023654397,0.0040761977,0.012819711,0.00032025887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012238069,0.00012583932,0.050259657,0.00014020741,0.00006779128,0.00489551,0.06687201,0.0008232616,0.000442476,0.5194959,0.3091038,0.04765121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008880809,0.00007403965,0.08874283,0.0012786043,0.00017431928,0.0012672285,0.1647254,0.0010970354,0.00073391653,0.034485217,0.7068769,0.0004557248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99712497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10311068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10311068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21176252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7481238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160687993","doi":"10.21991/cf29422","title":"The Alchemy of Equality Rights","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Politics; Character (mathematics); Test (biology); Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03775945820894088,"score_gpt":0.3221107729389199,"score_spread":0.284351314729979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160687993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045084856,0.0032255065,0.015707185,0.041951824,0.00073117856,0.000038295944,0.00015937406,0.00006098834,0.9336172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76667845,0.004048459,0.011849704,0.027434371,0.0019827674,0.00030747429,0.00016473836,0.00020410876,0.1873299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906998,0.0031062579,0.00026097227,0.001733471,0.0030138916,0.0011855047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996311,0.0015913685,0.00022696081,0.00084464444,0.0007466262,0.0002794292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066532562,0.0005170716,0.0005653886,0.0012010159,0.009718526,0.009741802,0.0014718252,0.0042358595,0.012751681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011741369,0.00043226645,0.00045322656,0.0010030904,0.05598503,0.01029859,0.0062153134,0.009824668,0.0021085648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013147685,9.245367e-7,0.000012667053,0.000002769026,4.8436783e-7,0.0000053160097,0.00018556831,0.000019045025,0.000010167058,0.9977779,0.0013284165,0.0006553794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009051584,0.0000034095763,0.00006865594,0.00004056623,0.0000027216327,0.000024410698,0.00016771667,0.0001342002,0.0001041909,0.9139276,0.08551136,0.0000061420974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047658235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037213117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047658235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01200631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009771434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09476167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160943048","doi":"10.21991/cf29418","title":"Cautious Optimism: Fraser v Canada (Attorney General)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Supreme court; Adverse possession; Watson; Adverse effect; Political science; Medicine; History","score_opus":0.020940815336034077,"score_gpt":0.2713530270220552,"score_spread":0.2504122116860211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160943048","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003701027,0.003833095,0.00051837054,0.9056171,0.00590979,0.000042166015,0.00020972374,0.0000997972,0.080068976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037853062,0.000926794,0.00080740603,0.90475833,0.0014022005,0.000036881225,0.000056310357,0.000051948755,0.05410702],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98878956,0.0010893438,0.00036752806,0.0024783209,0.0043828813,0.0028923736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918594,0.0021544306,0.00020083511,0.00026797978,0.0034429622,0.0020743522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006760594,0.0005830461,0.00065315946,0.0010215762,0.021252148,0.010368759,0.0042058113,0.037139837,0.0095033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016729597,0.00068036333,0.00089210545,0.0011348304,0.0112002995,0.0055068815,0.0023460067,0.03406377,0.0018104152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025868663,0.000019838939,0.0010741167,0.000045153974,0.00001629543,0.0005743778,0.0021777784,0.00015329578,0.00019752391,0.10529964,0.879916,0.010500115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004143442,0.000024323894,0.0021917752,0.0003615945,0.00003914367,0.00041313743,0.0032461751,0.0003667368,0.00038481713,0.030319901,0.96243536,0.0001755757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88410664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9481273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115893364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034374863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.108861536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24940825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161197987","doi":"10.21991/cf29421","title":"Critical Reflections on Fraser: What Equality Are We Seeking?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Charter; Constitution; Political science; Law; Reading (process); Politics","score_opus":0.09550983661906681,"score_gpt":0.39144068646995805,"score_spread":0.29593084985089124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161197987","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028011666,0.0057435078,0.0004153279,0.95857614,0.003470413,0.000018756007,0.00004012107,0.000012746381,0.02892178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19902863,0.008965743,0.00125645,0.745078,0.0057750363,0.00013445556,0.000037328915,0.00014273313,0.039581586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97774667,0.009345137,0.0004167992,0.002523241,0.005072593,0.0048955744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97015315,0.02056376,0.0012219246,0.00055979594,0.005297386,0.0022039239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02583803,0.0011119006,0.0010825617,0.002528072,0.056159258,0.018964281,0.0051842555,0.026538454,0.00649506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04645085,0.0005394002,0.00091335666,0.0032423693,0.09056389,0.02081481,0.0079531,0.040854964,0.00089359045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020431244,0.000015140902,0.00022527663,0.00011156491,0.00000614646,0.0003681528,0.09514508,0.000090719026,0.0000726333,0.5688965,0.33010516,0.00494328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014820742,0.000009745056,0.00032740494,0.00075887697,0.000009765039,0.00020583169,0.1703336,0.000100440426,0.00024936226,0.10965548,0.71826404,0.00007059188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58416134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6235243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58416134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.067634925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06279294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8365752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161629668","doi":"10.21991/cf29419","title":"The Elephant in the Room and Straw Men on Fire","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Privilege (computing); Charter; Law; Section (typography); Constitution; Political science; Sociology; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.02563228055779123,"score_gpt":0.2960249134474994,"score_spread":0.2703926328897082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161629668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05170615,0.009551379,0.0034578983,0.22820508,0.004927089,0.000033410455,0.00008122841,0.00008324173,0.70195454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7254464,0.0033095947,0.0016020207,0.036102504,0.00057864573,0.000034868324,0.00004648824,0.00018051459,0.23269899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964439,0.0014351628,0.000041057625,0.00044036537,0.00061861007,0.0010207798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897313,0.00034940912,0.000054631506,0.00011549067,0.00014682257,0.00036054835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037867688,0.00044951466,0.00047208858,0.000708525,0.0388322,0.011116377,0.0013246263,0.006593953,0.017769001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005123005,0.00046257736,0.00037791577,0.0004946905,0.039442763,0.01182397,0.00796441,0.010045235,0.0022974494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003834628,0.000031016174,0.00074658,0.000024597384,0.0000033704985,0.0006024372,0.045090005,0.000060914303,0.00011622533,0.83974016,0.098733544,0.014812754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014565678,0.000032905373,0.0008090685,0.0004119325,0.000007312183,0.0005114984,0.1376146,0.00016758333,0.00035079522,0.13313554,0.7269136,0.000030598054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07934699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2270613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07934699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007642463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014611626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15777028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161683840","doi":"","title":"The Tin Ear of the Court: Ktunaxa Nation and the Foundations of the Duty to Consult","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Duty; Political science; Sovereignty; Jurisprudence; Jurisdiction; Politics","score_opus":0.011408855796055257,"score_gpt":0.28214282333197027,"score_spread":0.270733967535915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161683840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070536114,0.004683585,0.0049913665,0.0857025,0.00067989354,0.000048980208,0.00005468855,0.000031424166,0.8332714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9341264,0.0010824197,0.00103097,0.01147191,0.00014418924,0.000041642616,0.00002158187,0.000020816038,0.052060105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952218,0.0011364666,0.00012872566,0.0005581987,0.001253505,0.0017013039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99697185,0.0013784718,0.00019240897,0.0001987171,0.0008523782,0.00040619166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041855797,0.00018647115,0.00047245296,0.00096301787,0.027138265,0.015377459,0.0015804891,0.010295019,0.0058030714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008937178,0.0003579475,0.00038042435,0.0011104674,0.023333784,0.0067592557,0.005190045,0.011103562,0.00045985152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045757542,0.0000038233975,0.00023980945,0.0000052529967,0.0000012570395,0.00014521478,0.0027989226,0.00004335782,0.000040638202,0.99333125,0.0022738215,0.0011120288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032114953,0.00002669206,0.003253967,0.00053511857,0.00003186637,0.00042927265,0.01708354,0.0012620046,0.00036391095,0.76043403,0.21646325,0.00008430684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44918913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5019238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5508109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025060575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039733056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89314914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163005898","doi":"","title":"Canada's Residential Schools and the Right to Family Integrity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Intervention (counseling); Genocide; Political science; Law; State (computer science); International law; Geography; Psychology","score_opus":0.011060360617047287,"score_gpt":0.2826294818024169,"score_spread":0.27156912118536963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163005898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17030069,0.0045650466,0.0022711877,0.13502592,0.0002705566,0.000082373575,0.00052528153,0.000068989066,0.68688995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94092256,0.0014384399,0.0010464046,0.009665701,0.00003824405,0.000026435202,0.000073953786,0.000019849947,0.046768486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99359787,0.00090412336,0.0001619346,0.00048756102,0.0018871963,0.0029613362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99194616,0.00173962,0.0007057609,0.0005631232,0.0026022068,0.0024432093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027482468,0.00016636874,0.0003320245,0.0009348823,0.03127001,0.00752023,0.0018436708,0.003401413,0.009052886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009328917,0.00030426413,0.00030921563,0.001551595,0.02077127,0.0024435122,0.0054747267,0.0053123287,0.00028183195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018818146,0.000023495577,0.008387215,0.000050114766,0.000011435509,0.00042186398,0.025203377,0.0003059281,0.00014213157,0.92685914,0.021025253,0.017551217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057126003,0.000054879987,0.07556686,0.0010350347,0.000065196655,0.0007163707,0.070347704,0.001081296,0.00080402545,0.13035515,0.7197197,0.00019662466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99138266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99658835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07384998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07384998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20700414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5358217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163258748","doi":"","title":"La notion de 'choix' dans la décision de se marier ou non au Québec (The Notion of ‘Choice’ in the Decision to Marry or Not in Quebec)","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031920291891909466,"score_gpt":0.3196503531178292,"score_spread":0.2877300612259197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163258748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31152385,0.0030640154,0.011158772,0.03306505,0.00026578328,0.00011529227,0.000411464,0.00003136081,0.64036435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97027135,0.00023124524,0.0005047531,0.00061301095,0.000015454438,0.00001669693,0.00002918488,0.0000075454136,0.028310707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972402,0.0009822114,0.00005775701,0.0004155745,0.00042710322,0.00087705796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979517,0.00059644756,0.00020872356,0.00009470607,0.000650088,0.0004983352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026195429,0.0003130268,0.0002736533,0.00087318046,0.011032898,0.0059680264,0.0012765178,0.002518477,0.01574186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027357033,0.00023107225,0.00029155987,0.0011638817,0.021194663,0.0018831023,0.0019169671,0.00231291,0.0005065162],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006902897,0.0000222443,0.008971565,0.00005020696,0.000018471641,0.0004059179,0.026840912,0.0010407207,0.000395287,0.94136995,0.008275819,0.012539903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013968075,0.00014933839,0.08552044,0.0008598701,0.00008851694,0.00048557785,0.12692145,0.0070419465,0.000836107,0.21171546,0.5658795,0.00036213847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95746017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97342616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05743061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05743061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03363718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41669017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163377589","doi":"10.3968/12007","title":"Culture and the Childs Right: The Many Ways Most Cultures Abuse the Rights of the Child","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child abuse; Order (exchange); Political science; Child protection; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Medicine; Poison control; Business; Suicide prevention; Medical emergency; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017489588172796913,"score_gpt":0.32516840125184737,"score_spread":0.3076788130790505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163377589","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14449154,0.17488818,0.0033891182,0.433179,0.0018287768,0.00003001384,0.00013362945,0.00003143678,0.24202834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8891415,0.07711414,0.0013305956,0.021419756,0.0007190718,0.00003121724,0.000044646964,0.000046305668,0.010152681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921754,0.00498248,0.0002728686,0.0004287822,0.0014038086,0.00073667016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922207,0.005131055,0.0010231431,0.00040940187,0.00064006663,0.0005756297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060128765,0.00029154622,0.0003879017,0.0011641751,0.00718619,0.008004569,0.00094590295,0.0026142683,0.003981871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010552341,0.00020725076,0.00021774156,0.0019339876,0.035414897,0.011319505,0.0057164705,0.0074663656,0.00042057742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025371563,0.000026481213,0.0043991897,0.00040943682,0.00001600955,0.0008805791,0.3198596,0.00005050398,0.0003871641,0.6079315,0.01732267,0.048691615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055371393,0.000045054487,0.00929321,0.0039528576,0.000018412107,0.002536218,0.3785566,0.000058422003,0.0007221289,0.123678125,0.4810717,0.00006171935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015734984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020005895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015734984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003914543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004561015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031799495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163692583","doi":"","title":"The Future of Canadian Universal Health Care System: A Contextual Analysis of Section 7 of the Charter and Chaoulli","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Government (linguistics); Health care; Political science; Social security; Supreme court; Dignity; Public administration; Statute; Law; Business","score_opus":0.010055480779841607,"score_gpt":0.24831825573359295,"score_spread":0.23826277495375134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163692583","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19129011,0.013199153,0.0016247294,0.2631957,0.00052656746,0.0002946964,0.0015532259,0.000047398575,0.5282684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96698743,0.0035918548,0.00095633836,0.014123733,0.00007128872,0.00009467839,0.00020815138,0.000038788996,0.013927877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877862,0.0026538353,0.00018923494,0.00088853145,0.0029165973,0.0055655856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927695,0.0019157786,0.00035770537,0.00022106187,0.0025885191,0.0021474638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047910297,0.0006025103,0.00066656194,0.0030373759,0.051135555,0.019743633,0.0036289473,0.005516246,0.0072547747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008796304,0.00051496003,0.00084171665,0.005502162,0.029248362,0.0056932606,0.0069349892,0.0072349794,0.00024833024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025976333,0.000034665696,0.006612431,0.00012884733,0.000020201895,0.0011346344,0.09729517,0.0006466302,0.00019711001,0.8488495,0.037668243,0.007386591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030017682,0.000037921738,0.02877332,0.0010269659,0.00007795244,0.00035099496,0.43204716,0.0012976415,0.00023570869,0.056452278,0.47939774,0.00027232658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6225987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3774013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40136942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72212625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163824935","doi":"10.1177/0040571x211008547","title":"The Anglican Church’s sexual abuse defence playbook","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Offensive; Restitution; Sexual abuse; Law; Mythology; Criminology; Sexual assault; Adversarial system; Child sexual abuse; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Theology; Philosophy; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Engineering; Medicine; Operations research","score_opus":0.02846498285129907,"score_gpt":0.3120243863349221,"score_spread":0.283559403483623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163824935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098148726,0.05246287,0.0018114632,0.0807939,0.008779225,0.0000740101,0.0002234091,0.00013879726,0.7575676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48298684,0.024457054,0.0019163603,0.010355304,0.0025374703,0.00006893268,0.00012268648,0.00016924109,0.47738615],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994324,0.00035895707,0.000015920901,0.000020063164,0.000090719455,0.00008191014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999172,0.00047067046,0.000042428324,0.000034352495,0.00009692158,0.00018364616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008937466,0.0003392376,0.000186335,0.0007636197,0.010438345,0.003237057,0.0005191648,0.0010142056,0.013497742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013461392,0.00025907325,0.00010206074,0.0005290714,0.0035796273,0.0014142132,0.0019143595,0.0030783024,0.0019301185],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050564606,0.00011065886,0.0014440023,0.00041041104,0.0000065224967,0.0016108103,0.31096694,0.000115421775,0.0011766365,0.14636233,0.43129155,0.10645408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018968692,0.000015529005,0.00074133644,0.00022666664,0.0000016356232,0.00037109907,0.043620367,0.000031032265,0.00018460797,0.0011663395,0.95363235,0.0000070918863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017627975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06607695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017627975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002132639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023425338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045154452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164391389","doi":"10.46692/9781529200638.007","title":"The Westminster Model as a Constitutional Archetype","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Archetype; Political science; Computer science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.058794835931678065,"score_gpt":0.3383508699275056,"score_spread":0.27955603399582757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164391389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015205243,0.0031717208,0.057428565,0.010242946,0.00023878412,0.00010363701,0.00024928557,0.000087465334,0.9132723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7162151,0.0053103757,0.053290594,0.005917642,0.00035385066,0.0006338488,0.00037723323,0.0002101885,0.21769126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619734,0.0017993142,0.0001790023,0.0006858094,0.0007625346,0.00037605484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875426,0.0005116396,0.00009118379,0.00038082796,0.00018798142,0.00007410743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003613746,0.00042510804,0.00044874212,0.0014532917,0.002884793,0.008762513,0.00096893735,0.0025864227,0.008020449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032066219,0.00041747632,0.00035131047,0.0017956593,0.01572391,0.009102878,0.0025721889,0.004358122,0.001308713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.456902e-7,8.2642384e-7,0.000007599587,0.0000022440613,2.4945118e-7,0.0000020203286,0.00010125751,0.00005639286,0.000010495083,0.9989981,0.00027956307,0.0005406713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056343,0.00000900362,0.000112587506,0.000047689962,0.0000031686682,0.000023169576,0.00026204254,0.00062023423,0.00015621643,0.8660652,0.13268612,0.000008942094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009997521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008404926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009997521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063242335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004774565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04588574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164599838","doi":"","title":"Positive Freedoms and Peaceful Assemblies: Reenvisioning Section 2(c) of the Charter","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Statute; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Legislature; Veto; Section (typography); Law and economics; Scope (computer science); Constitution; Politics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.015084180091001936,"score_gpt":0.2695220312426068,"score_spread":0.2544378511516049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164599838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054152206,0.0013089171,0.0100000985,0.020053545,0.00038260518,0.00009332261,0.00008050645,0.000051321098,0.9138774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.952835,0.00064391387,0.0037983072,0.0046039275,0.00011445058,0.00008918888,0.00005380232,0.000028521841,0.0378329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99007213,0.002179006,0.00018634569,0.00079433975,0.003708216,0.0030599493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99558467,0.0019267808,0.00047679277,0.0005255819,0.0009933497,0.0004929295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071651186,0.00042071397,0.00035349067,0.0011205033,0.013141812,0.01005076,0.0013851488,0.0034054415,0.0039480347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00986181,0.00035563996,0.0006189989,0.0007813318,0.033658292,0.0045043156,0.0064602112,0.0058187293,0.00035380252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056636586,0.0000066309285,0.0003414622,0.000009026779,0.0000012335337,0.0000486388,0.006494551,0.0001658814,0.00011381904,0.9871774,0.0020924646,0.0035433706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048791997,0.000077589466,0.011317942,0.00040959462,0.000030279118,0.00022718112,0.017793948,0.0011188174,0.0014393647,0.49268994,0.47467774,0.00016873235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6027253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71093076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6027253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022912046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058262397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7992286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165876900","doi":"10.1080/07481187.2021.1926631","title":"Assistance in dying: A comparative look at legal definitions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Death Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Confusion; Terminology; Death with dignity; Diversity (politics); Glossary; Action (physics); Foundation (evidence); Sociology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.24617645618702466,"score_gpt":0.4090427128091024,"score_spread":0.16286625662207777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165876900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06856932,0.34813282,0.0077894363,0.10691661,0.0033411128,0.0001251554,0.00021764488,0.000034195422,0.46487382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81633973,0.1539377,0.0054439353,0.014830192,0.0017571363,0.0003587502,0.00022852467,0.00008279466,0.0070212213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837157,0.0129492385,0.00084908237,0.00035627035,0.0014412178,0.00068843557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811383,0.01554807,0.0012645682,0.00040662312,0.0012172391,0.0004251526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012480715,0.00059396087,0.0010314573,0.01249377,0.012097837,0.012082006,0.0019641567,0.003813282,0.0035494652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017504865,0.00023304207,0.00054793974,0.014787963,0.036319226,0.013515056,0.0075906534,0.0053720176,0.00036273838],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013544029,0.000018959747,0.00034410288,0.0005638122,0.000006165616,0.00021605383,0.14264171,0.00012510762,0.0000858609,0.8385083,0.0072618723,0.010214633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011460972,0.000058311904,0.0039565875,0.006408957,0.000017003962,0.00069667096,0.44402465,0.0002575336,0.00014932403,0.15824099,0.38612974,0.000048701444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01560875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026907144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01560875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013335622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065829423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09675717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168215178","doi":"","title":"Marshalling Principles From the Marshall Morass","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Treaty; Jurisprudence; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Political science; Divergence (linguistics); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02789135202315932,"score_gpt":0.28682792279353686,"score_spread":0.2589365707703775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168215178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010153424,0.006278137,0.021190852,0.06474394,0.0009967951,0.00008618911,0.00013173754,0.000079246725,0.89633965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70203656,0.0063171647,0.019136874,0.042914968,0.0023691708,0.00044507676,0.00014747353,0.00030521897,0.22632752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99353963,0.0016538332,0.00023266613,0.00086043106,0.0025124073,0.0012010627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976744,0.000991699,0.00014067047,0.00037283366,0.0005828327,0.00023744833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008006724,0.00056557346,0.00063306926,0.0017382138,0.011603683,0.008945016,0.0018060679,0.0056370553,0.006980504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012603936,0.00040089706,0.00077508483,0.0013069566,0.028821807,0.0064501436,0.006880313,0.009464138,0.0013730511],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000194573,0.0000013274396,0.00003271171,0.000005122944,0.0000010785814,0.000019860057,0.00085107656,0.00005483397,0.000014818767,0.9930534,0.0045757815,0.0013880419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007605158,0.0000047048256,0.0001582925,0.00011244848,0.0000062179915,0.0000368598,0.00079920015,0.00018920611,0.00009556165,0.7994427,0.19913226,0.000014912132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17960045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2198114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17960045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020256683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027045818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35711014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168578458","doi":"","title":"Turning Feminist Judgments into Jurisprudence: The Women's Court of Canada on Substantive Equality","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Tribunal; Humanities; Context (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.01642728054762735,"score_gpt":0.31040072794758955,"score_spread":0.29397344739996223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168578458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05274632,0.018971479,0.004071962,0.22563449,0.0013849868,0.000071758586,0.0003405274,0.00008268608,0.69669586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8988558,0.0034152553,0.0016644626,0.023806471,0.00033907,0.00005566397,0.000061303996,0.000093309,0.07170863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873347,0.0034779643,0.00021015422,0.001160624,0.004367883,0.0034486628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935062,0.0031188473,0.00026874695,0.00021728288,0.0019473267,0.0009415997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006389632,0.00048694908,0.0006197072,0.0025124385,0.036404155,0.02208892,0.0026898638,0.00743578,0.006731598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017679865,0.00055653905,0.0004815758,0.003073863,0.04723235,0.0048688287,0.005582087,0.009277436,0.0004006151],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015904783,0.000006397069,0.0005302887,0.00003147745,0.000007201822,0.00019388748,0.016502162,0.00032525547,0.0001366403,0.9548571,0.020857755,0.006536012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005064328,0.000018462011,0.0071048005,0.0006440101,0.000056601344,0.000088260385,0.055553418,0.0015721103,0.0008270238,0.30128905,0.63262355,0.00017211976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.987444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7837019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2162981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15482067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9089831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168666551","doi":"10.26180/14586411.v1","title":"Providing effectively for Indigenous customary law : New Zealand, Canada and Australia and Indigenous customary adoptions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Customary land; Customary international law; Indigenous rights; Political science; Geography; Law; International law; Ecology; Agriculture; Biology; Land tenure","score_opus":0.038603736558887165,"score_gpt":0.3139306713094176,"score_spread":0.27532693475053044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168666551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9055377,0.0013874664,0.00022235524,0.006900753,0.000051160383,0.00004645908,0.00006283623,0.000007247482,0.085784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921171,0.0008932042,0.00013449212,0.00018983602,0.0000050300264,0.000010236291,0.00001558162,0.000007788295,0.006626633],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965514,0.00062974903,0.00008491419,0.00021498855,0.0011714296,0.001347477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932609,0.0015865709,0.0011309579,0.0002667225,0.0017449508,0.0020097846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034144337,0.00018807266,0.0004447283,0.0015050374,0.013350161,0.0066129924,0.0010556354,0.00088285404,0.008005501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013303862,0.00021497771,0.00017130068,0.0036774469,0.016917506,0.004552916,0.004790911,0.0028442577,0.00022930022],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034223052,0.00011769858,0.04091014,0.00009493022,0.000014881738,0.00059684954,0.84382474,0.00009416291,0.00027622515,0.070926994,0.004605123,0.038503993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053613526,0.00002106842,0.13687937,0.000439462,0.000018953342,0.0001296996,0.82752293,0.00016790394,0.000111594134,0.00345025,0.031214068,0.000039304912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95568115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98146594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044318855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0358924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05871516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26041877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168754267","doi":"","title":"All Families Are Equal, But Do Some Matter More than Others? How Gender, Poverty, and Domestic Violence Put Quebec's Family Law Reform to the Test","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Poverty; Test (biology); Political science; Family law; Sociology; Law; Criminology; Gender studies; Demographic economics; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Environmental health; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.023581867726911992,"score_gpt":0.27996540027198735,"score_spread":0.25638353254507534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168754267","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20662908,0.007250788,0.0019963346,0.5553324,0.0007004212,0.00006056859,0.00039121296,0.00004080045,0.22759846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95239526,0.0016414337,0.00069876254,0.027935417,0.00007269165,0.00002897547,0.000052778545,0.000013432069,0.017161172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955664,0.0018618233,0.000054048713,0.0003630056,0.0007268622,0.0014277914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933689,0.002025279,0.00048696893,0.00040057508,0.0021310984,0.0015872042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054563913,0.00020922534,0.00033510244,0.0010109657,0.017061096,0.008751189,0.0015204817,0.002962226,0.004271452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010974669,0.00018786709,0.00032679448,0.00095278205,0.020636823,0.0046413746,0.0018787653,0.0044698925,0.0002332579],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040045557,0.000080295504,0.04039476,0.000078525045,0.000043759155,0.00045459621,0.057369538,0.0005428391,0.00034751013,0.7556083,0.08934976,0.055690054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056893983,0.00010386021,0.14449874,0.0012492517,0.00011663862,0.00054522604,0.18960868,0.0019026663,0.0010069411,0.09838365,0.5622918,0.00023556156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9794911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076132394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.076132394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.064019956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55238175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169247029","doi":"","title":"The Busy Harbours of Canadian Federalism: The Division of Powers and its Doctrines in the McLachlin Court","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Federalism; Law; Jurisprudence; Legislation; Humanities; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013074065497042464,"score_gpt":0.28294566884822775,"score_spread":0.26987160335118526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169247029","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06293736,0.012176785,0.005644854,0.105171055,0.0006057665,0.00010236665,0.0003024921,0.000058012658,0.8130014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9054264,0.0033032938,0.0029641232,0.0073387097,0.00021507572,0.00006796725,0.000074168434,0.000060020942,0.08055025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99403065,0.0013035162,0.00013252444,0.00067513983,0.002302038,0.001556112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99581194,0.0014732211,0.00022970003,0.00019133987,0.0018854605,0.00040838285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044466252,0.0003779172,0.00029158013,0.0024323715,0.030885737,0.013580311,0.0018392788,0.0031238224,0.0059656673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009852554,0.0005222505,0.00036599225,0.0037879813,0.030733503,0.0037180255,0.0024632637,0.0053303773,0.00034968284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007583617,0.0000027098745,0.00027059362,0.000013149244,0.0000017894137,0.00004551533,0.0057759127,0.00011555406,0.000041487656,0.98322326,0.0072787837,0.003223743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038874296,0.000018422345,0.009854331,0.0004543314,0.000034698758,0.00012845811,0.022083908,0.0026496218,0.00039090382,0.3760619,0.5881006,0.00018403369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99130064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9933448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23164032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23164032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1410828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8911883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169659597","doi":"","title":"Competing Arguments in Carter v. Canada (2015): How the Supreme Court of Canada's Ruling Constitutionally Upholds Charter Rights and Reflects Societal Values","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Terminally ill; Criminal code; Sociology; Criminal law; Palliative care; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.02151340305161071,"score_gpt":0.2756215907359712,"score_spread":0.2541081876843605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169659597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124125026,0.00912965,0.004699933,0.41858822,0.0024471583,0.00015318154,0.00070343056,0.000084740466,0.4400687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85949486,0.0016404447,0.00155743,0.10642902,0.00048432298,0.00006874796,0.00009436786,0.000074472075,0.030156376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838966,0.0025553526,0.00035233574,0.001758052,0.005613622,0.0058240537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883416,0.0052087572,0.00048871274,0.00028932295,0.0036061036,0.0020655033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009440417,0.00046524545,0.00077651977,0.0022259993,0.03792181,0.017404541,0.0039159544,0.016228462,0.003917435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027111718,0.0006467643,0.0009125537,0.0029780439,0.028482934,0.004493518,0.0051429253,0.022079514,0.0002754159],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030363848,0.000010662547,0.0008111387,0.000030051571,0.000015366033,0.00032479892,0.013024,0.00017521513,0.00015277902,0.95224684,0.028550256,0.0046286695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021609543,0.000054942215,0.012547727,0.0013886476,0.00024981739,0.00028677878,0.05544059,0.0021347583,0.0018757365,0.33299777,0.59217674,0.00063039485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9793788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9878328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12571691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12571691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15092702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9121443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170297720","doi":"","title":"Are Members of the Clergy Without the Law? Hart v Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of the Diocese of Kingston","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Law; Political science; Theology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.02170633414077549,"score_gpt":0.28034958728406817,"score_spread":0.2586432531432927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170297720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48775083,0.00439076,0.00027457587,0.30638605,0.0015316029,0.00010618056,0.00009750908,0.000027840433,0.19943467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7798033,0.00092215574,0.00012037189,0.106302805,0.00026579315,0.000041803352,0.000017548055,0.000029500541,0.11249681],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944977,0.0014111877,0.00012399994,0.0003982492,0.00050664524,0.0030621844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947076,0.0016655712,0.00042699068,0.00027257774,0.00070381275,0.0022234602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041644205,0.00023684224,0.00060049235,0.00036803345,0.030080834,0.008579773,0.002177043,0.015217227,0.009428658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0104971565,0.0009933074,0.0003143091,0.00052185036,0.010901186,0.0037009001,0.004683912,0.01587409,0.0010291247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037226386,0.00032223543,0.053985488,0.00025626947,0.00012289606,0.009875805,0.22937669,0.00027043954,0.0016895471,0.32106444,0.35898668,0.02367726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009872526,0.00015703271,0.052493237,0.0007168802,0.00011237368,0.0014043812,0.41576478,0.000250822,0.0011530541,0.014470739,0.51315004,0.00022791041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43153816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75231224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43153816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01123017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03262211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8580527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170699339","doi":"10.1017/9781108614252.005","title":"The Nature of Divine Commands in Classical Legal Theory","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.018298356734868217,"score_gpt":0.24162850988795845,"score_spread":0.22333015315309024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170699339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009013272,0.012311127,0.013178507,0.0109789735,0.00039028047,0.00002367377,0.000057037552,0.000028438128,0.95401865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77927816,0.0073909014,0.0063984394,0.002332427,0.0012185844,0.00016607498,0.0000834689,0.00010238826,0.2030295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984769,0.00085016136,0.000045576868,0.00014224452,0.0003263894,0.00015865831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971507,0.0021634086,0.00008308819,0.0002605554,0.00023864777,0.00010351582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022874868,0.00045070378,0.0006861234,0.002362091,0.003579415,0.0076972386,0.001234441,0.0033616198,0.01136853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004454569,0.0005260048,0.0002785542,0.0023838389,0.039557148,0.011035261,0.0021187651,0.005776548,0.0010328159],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.1555764e-7,0.0000016091069,0.000003908305,0.0000033891206,2.0901253e-7,0.0000024712404,0.00033298606,0.000024128265,0.0000027686665,0.998486,0.000530591,0.0006114321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018739509,0.0000015999337,0.00003076646,0.000020501253,4.567723e-7,0.000008088896,0.00020513465,0.000149338,0.000011337987,0.98725533,0.01231351,0.0000019885572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007228369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009342879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01136853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072878664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028063888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052877367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170839569","doi":"10.21991/cf29374","title":"The Constitution of Canada as Supreme Law: A New Definition","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.024256995596565196,"score_gpt":0.26270637281413517,"score_spread":0.23844937721756998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170839569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018506955,0.018872052,0.047082316,0.092759944,0.0040718657,0.00024398782,0.0017600292,0.0002582945,0.8164445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76616395,0.018606253,0.07572465,0.02415298,0.0023956278,0.000594242,0.0017957591,0.00034168325,0.11022493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99407333,0.0009503726,0.00020288645,0.00077659934,0.0028128535,0.001183945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99652207,0.0006198424,0.0001570071,0.00025230128,0.0020186575,0.00043009795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032615315,0.00059112575,0.00082556746,0.0057835933,0.011931117,0.015030989,0.0027921586,0.0032283587,0.005063353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052963505,0.0004214427,0.0005196242,0.0072223553,0.032296833,0.0054774876,0.003306592,0.006952432,0.00047388277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.589082e-7,0.000001215534,0.000070821065,0.000007940955,8.251616e-7,0.000016261261,0.00063881016,0.0000726853,0.000029222327,0.9939322,0.0037793375,0.001449696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015608804,0.000006086599,0.0015208767,0.00020725129,0.0000144813575,0.00009008679,0.0019794067,0.0011312623,0.00013843157,0.30253586,0.69230884,0.000051830466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9123327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9200613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08766729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0762533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1013625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.553259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174183552","doi":"10.21307/borderlands-2020-011","title":"Creative Sovereignties and Fiscal Relations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Borderlands Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Erasmus+; University of Pittsburgh","keywords":"Treaty; Colonialism; Sovereignty; Indigenous; Decolonization; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Politics; Political economy; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03675089567462383,"score_gpt":0.3109365581570146,"score_spread":0.2741856624823908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174183552","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10924723,0.0026711514,0.0031410644,0.031941313,0.00020853666,0.000033647095,0.00004135164,0.000027380162,0.8526883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98370796,0.0006103796,0.0004606221,0.001397778,0.000046698562,0.000012327444,0.000017634486,0.000013149768,0.013733472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949091,0.00199845,0.00013884922,0.00033983594,0.0009925477,0.0016211668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99604344,0.0016062252,0.0005538355,0.00037864878,0.00060523313,0.0008126596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006301593,0.00031542548,0.00026906046,0.0020780633,0.023143243,0.016675772,0.0013799439,0.0027699564,0.0074868887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007941908,0.00017922011,0.00036743958,0.0025430345,0.08929231,0.0066725365,0.008448875,0.0047422866,0.00026555645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019522868,0.000004084712,0.00023125399,0.000005141982,0.0000010411829,0.000039741986,0.008919548,0.0000669145,0.000012985584,0.9887854,0.00069612864,0.0012358313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035954523,0.000013891745,0.002838865,0.000436734,0.00001079981,0.00018487948,0.07053021,0.00047531995,0.00025919743,0.6355428,0.28962758,0.000043826458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27816278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36823383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27816278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047443185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041831315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55308735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174232670","doi":"","title":"Laws of the Constitution: Consolidated","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04721913213972048,"score_gpt":0.3053782896867626,"score_spread":0.2581591575470421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174232670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011249175,0.016195146,0.0013878795,0.006395666,0.0007361437,0.000036966816,0.00042488918,0.00009584148,0.97360253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10531458,0.028290745,0.0055220323,0.0052156374,0.00075430056,0.00012958702,0.0018373021,0.00032968653,0.8526062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998245,0.00016487179,0.000034411933,0.00013759063,0.0011466865,0.00027150067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991498,0.00014263132,0.00003315763,0.0000938003,0.000499825,0.000080867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001110066,0.00044215165,0.00026769636,0.0028014837,0.0034217997,0.009483567,0.0010019161,0.0011700022,0.009678472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026894596,0.00027943144,0.00020130932,0.0046272487,0.0071659163,0.0031321056,0.0017534789,0.0027449059,0.0017575426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030302629,0.0000041483377,0.00012131974,0.000044756223,0.0000015754763,0.000023098635,0.0015984675,0.00017572472,0.00006339673,0.7822415,0.18527399,0.030448953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012427704,9.924249e-7,0.00046114478,0.00008672015,0.0000013041324,0.000018546449,0.00040938842,0.00006615132,0.000035469082,0.018960645,0.97995526,0.000003288195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7067924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7943534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7067924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04327462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06108279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58986866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175327714","doi":"","title":"All guides: First Nations - Student Guide: Law and Rights","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04274688583406208,"score_gpt":0.36333280824357533,"score_spread":0.3205859224095132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175327714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027435157,0.00043590987,0.0012560503,0.0013055208,0.0003710366,0.00023807884,0.008630797,0.0014994745,0.98598874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00072211155,0.00034706458,0.0011593071,0.00042803815,0.000054295462,0.00017634983,0.0034888478,0.000671491,0.9929524],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999037,0.00020449057,0.00006808422,0.00006898341,0.0004921471,0.00012928178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952911,0.0011530616,0.00010956807,0.0003632334,0.0026210835,0.00046198934],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016584465,0.0012052464,0.0010667116,0.0041299458,0.0036968584,0.0052654934,0.0014742567,0.0026695188,0.6188791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061754356,0.0012377205,0.0005948288,0.004151293,0.0008693173,0.0050493293,0.0022207154,0.0030657246,0.4411847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000445106,0.00001920057,0.00007557877,0.000044485285,3.7820118e-7,0.000009285994,0.00009180983,0.00003646263,0.000027829316,0.004636055,0.96917635,0.025878062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027826097,0.000003981558,0.00035919595,0.000115410185,5.76753e-7,0.000019934427,0.00015471333,0.00006806741,0.00006734231,0.0017085166,0.99749374,0.000005728186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039099354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1194154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96090066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029395183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00825945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54362273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175366073","doi":"","title":"Navigating Potentially Conflicting Political Rationalities: Discursive Strategies About “Family” in Alberta’s Child Welfare Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.015288723231851025,"score_gpt":0.315747726805006,"score_spread":0.30045900357315497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175366073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7421233,0.0008820346,0.0057232347,0.016402215,0.000051128933,0.00006278665,0.000017691253,0.00003796059,0.2346996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99584854,0.00011407216,0.0004960799,0.00047155106,0.0000039770466,0.000009669538,0.0000037260834,0.0000068362538,0.00304548],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913259,0.005519166,0.00009170852,0.00045069412,0.0011388505,0.0014736049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949868,0.0035346006,0.00043022484,0.00019772977,0.00040137942,0.00044938026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008839259,0.00026661076,0.00022476715,0.0017375646,0.027887126,0.012389339,0.0023223194,0.0029091048,0.0029923993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010347399,0.00028290635,0.00020414942,0.0014457874,0.062221434,0.0045593306,0.0068327445,0.003295721,0.000113796596],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016698987,0.000037204638,0.004520114,0.000019262601,0.0000056064478,0.00048305263,0.64601785,0.00035677222,0.000335143,0.33596453,0.0016022499,0.010641407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012364064,0.00002008969,0.0059777508,0.000102913815,0.000012255813,0.00011498846,0.8706731,0.0008083296,0.00038298467,0.064224266,0.05763754,0.000033499953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65964717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77046883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34035283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04934657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03102471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68471444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176248194","doi":"10.3138/ijcs.58.x.73","title":"The Duty to Consult and Reconciliation: The Supreme Court’s Idea of the Purpose and Practice of Consulting Indigenous Peoples","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Duty; Law; Supreme court; Obligation; Political science; Context (archaeology); Sovereignty; High Court; Constitution; Sociology; History; Politics","score_opus":0.050862232890812376,"score_gpt":0.34747842360679887,"score_spread":0.2966161907159865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176248194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045724865,0.008327629,0.01683883,0.19342777,0.0010487188,0.00012050729,0.00009010992,0.00006666599,0.73435485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93617624,0.0016592598,0.0034693414,0.027937667,0.0003919494,0.00008787844,0.000028049708,0.000050227303,0.030199375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9771895,0.008196783,0.0006178648,0.0019818856,0.0071814074,0.004832601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903784,0.0049921405,0.00044043412,0.00071766233,0.0024730407,0.0009982362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01469844,0.00036032972,0.0006769325,0.0022660033,0.031125093,0.01996524,0.004266251,0.019985905,0.0020883637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01878348,0.00059283734,0.0006425544,0.002169919,0.10983184,0.0073569156,0.0069391048,0.01585079,0.00025664526],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019101017,0.0000024186281,0.00009299031,0.000005361521,0.0000014482921,0.00006381727,0.008382903,0.0000796318,0.000027943159,0.98836106,0.0020693683,0.0009111179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028795028,0.000018572364,0.0014259074,0.0004901304,0.000026811058,0.00022853822,0.015908504,0.0012487972,0.00023945507,0.7180366,0.26224232,0.00010560232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7958549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75345653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20414507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07475497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12240236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5423878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176523456","doi":"","title":"Book Review of Sexual Regulation and the Law: A Canadian Perspective by Richard Jochelson and James Gacek, eds","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.010054357618212774,"score_gpt":0.27161959648928163,"score_spread":0.26156523887106886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176523456","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023658364,0.9358749,0.00024112033,0.021036338,0.006234094,0.000019758869,0.00026420993,0.000031329255,0.036061596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0047203423,0.92149734,0.0005956119,0.0066819685,0.003338355,0.00002904784,0.0002927942,0.00004700536,0.062797576],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787605,0.00015360098,0.00006474726,0.00013900774,0.0015336482,0.00023291225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99687177,0.0004952233,0.00014646008,0.000050400373,0.0021282013,0.0003079284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016189859,0.0014676087,0.0015183056,0.0086079305,0.0041562514,0.0065237167,0.002580784,0.0022569043,0.0151307555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004407428,0.00048182538,0.000735083,0.024396813,0.0044919676,0.0028941652,0.0012354796,0.0027209476,0.0036816525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010414138,0.000008225606,0.00014113035,0.0008213683,0.0000104069695,0.000052967407,0.0005808379,0.00022297645,0.00008012193,0.016523179,0.9155703,0.06597799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019247786,0.000002619929,0.00063308486,0.0006920031,0.000007982704,0.0000484567,0.0002625432,0.000026253128,0.0000149276575,0.0012731443,0.99702555,0.000011397778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8945543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10544568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042796247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.114363894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31050998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177574401","doi":"10.1017/9781009023146.009","title":"Secret Evidence in Civil Litigation against the Government","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil litigation; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Civil procedure; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05281484509606555,"score_gpt":0.24879439986167431,"score_spread":0.19597955476560877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177574401","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007421404,0.014901775,0.002260444,0.047275104,0.0014579984,0.000047780308,0.000048211023,0.000029843233,0.92655754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55680996,0.024877049,0.0034892655,0.03381119,0.0027600625,0.00024819677,0.0001317889,0.00009162994,0.37778085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926165,0.0033278,0.00030544103,0.00040366966,0.0023432549,0.0010033945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874698,0.010466501,0.00050736696,0.00052643026,0.00069320475,0.00033677174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072019347,0.0004641743,0.00046107726,0.0019395301,0.009038507,0.014531755,0.0020007952,0.012739501,0.015296426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021695547,0.00044849812,0.00044971931,0.0023056222,0.016159285,0.010197882,0.006695917,0.009280719,0.00297189],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005440673,0.000015496551,0.00010035557,0.00005089815,0.0000026806747,0.00046489967,0.004096208,0.00011619854,0.00004006965,0.942075,0.042694706,0.010337944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016468177,0.000023807625,0.00037194928,0.0014611301,0.000013183679,0.00049396616,0.008047118,0.000510155,0.00033455426,0.38853934,0.6001653,0.000022882821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064714593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01055636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015296426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070227673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006717658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05117166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181390979","doi":"","title":"Re-Thinking the Instrumental Rationality Principles of Fundamental Justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Arbitrariness; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Law; Individualism; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.051708447854904076,"score_gpt":0.3210598935051734,"score_spread":0.2693514456502693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181390979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05625637,0.0062353956,0.1013874,0.24598923,0.0019446479,0.00015818358,0.0002652221,0.00019898024,0.5875645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8823373,0.0010754245,0.01992489,0.05600881,0.00067986513,0.00013745767,0.000089158835,0.00011040916,0.039636694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877346,0.0035522801,0.00042895693,0.0020782186,0.004151575,0.0020544154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941367,0.0027796356,0.00034265994,0.0008649432,0.0014546745,0.00042139716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016065136,0.0006014979,0.00072055066,0.0015869144,0.007315347,0.012092259,0.0034273136,0.008175206,0.0032803207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014930855,0.0005275923,0.0009905226,0.000732466,0.05954359,0.012427845,0.006690705,0.01911185,0.00074811315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003291231,0.0000029393439,0.000059130143,0.0000053275676,0.000002203376,0.000010174152,0.0009081732,0.000054562617,0.000040985844,0.9964773,0.0013839016,0.0010519933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017872093,0.000013457269,0.00033498113,0.000073062954,0.000008936842,0.00003238898,0.0009230568,0.0004208675,0.00034843822,0.942491,0.055309173,0.00002684475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1196438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14693697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1196438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018799694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022615124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23789483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183973827","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12542","title":"The <i><scp>AFCC‐Ontario</scp> Parenting Plan Guide</i> and <i>Template</i>: Jurisdictionally‐Specific Resources for Family Justice Professionals and Parents","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Legislation; Jurisdiction; Plan (archaeology); Conciliation; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Political science; Public relations; Law; Nursing; Medicine; Mediation","score_opus":0.057967735171407325,"score_gpt":0.33761456779584664,"score_spread":0.27964683262443935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183973827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041501685,0.0014836034,0.008543054,0.014383549,0.0016418601,0.0016984738,0.020364929,0.0033188162,0.94441557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018914659,0.0044116774,0.03879714,0.010513405,0.0003666109,0.0021657408,0.01789951,0.0018837692,0.9050475],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883586,0.00014466625,0.00006727978,0.00006744823,0.0006410506,0.00024371293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99675673,0.00074869546,0.00021289603,0.00027990234,0.0013083942,0.00069336913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013866462,0.00052457483,0.00028846614,0.0015009163,0.0032902432,0.0022841252,0.0012596888,0.0022708587,0.17976612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065360195,0.0006388178,0.00032953732,0.0021273012,0.0013491522,0.0020124298,0.0022483799,0.0014665828,0.06301942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058360047,0.000021037176,0.00022671795,0.00006820532,5.870185e-7,0.000061765684,0.00067182386,0.000063965694,0.00018232368,0.0029115118,0.951653,0.04413329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004432675,0.000006428294,0.0012969956,0.00013161976,8.67799e-7,0.00005489413,0.00046924924,0.00004080533,0.000093288516,0.0006317348,0.9972594,0.000010352547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46053925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6947169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5394608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009102392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02711953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91571724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184369935","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3680","title":"First Nations, Settler Parliaments, and the Question of Consultation: Reconciling Parliamentary Supremacy and Indigenous Peoples’ Right to Self-Determination","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aotearoa; Law; Entitlement (fair division); Sovereignty; Indigenous; Political science; Legislature; State (computer science); Constitutional right; Democracy; Statutory law; Legislation; Sociology; Constitution; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.014331825370904354,"score_gpt":0.2932255233017246,"score_spread":0.27889369793082025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184369935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26102716,0.006634864,0.0036797558,0.15013443,0.00031697602,0.000049657116,0.000027010157,0.000027529728,0.5781025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987452,0.00044520674,0.0003630317,0.0040373653,0.00007578344,0.000023209855,0.0000043883288,0.000006726477,0.0075923027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806199,0.0120566655,0.00037938973,0.00083216454,0.0018103246,0.004301588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986978,0.009905129,0.00086318835,0.0004889929,0.0008352142,0.0009295624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0121666845,0.00018461038,0.00052459934,0.001117444,0.021937724,0.010806698,0.0015263364,0.009517517,0.0039773327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023796836,0.00032971456,0.00038451122,0.0010937325,0.04555784,0.006578756,0.0077560428,0.0086108735,0.0002613734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013438767,0.000016555208,0.0005731655,0.000019932178,0.000003904025,0.00027240952,0.03538119,0.00012495437,0.00016676837,0.9585576,0.0014357651,0.0034342813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010098998,0.000092708004,0.011099632,0.0007242164,0.00005097732,0.0006386575,0.10667317,0.0013917997,0.0011515125,0.68853766,0.18941095,0.0001277109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09695981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12109936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9030402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013231449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017608216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19279087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184461220","doi":"","title":"Rethinking the Role of Lawyers for Children: Child Representation in Canadian Family Relationship Cases","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Best interests; Presumption; Economic Justice; Welfare; Family law; Political science; Representation (politics); Law; Psychology; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.027387726465706367,"score_gpt":0.31223329247273174,"score_spread":0.2848455660070254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184461220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5416876,0.015939552,0.0055919336,0.19930652,0.000877358,0.00037027156,0.00019049879,0.00008232773,0.23595393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729618,0.00326242,0.0020886406,0.01427804,0.00012248656,0.00007175319,0.00003115453,0.00003331548,0.0071504503],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94593316,0.017395226,0.0018846935,0.0030822002,0.017402614,0.014302013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9463295,0.031483285,0.003957548,0.001511145,0.010362728,0.0063558365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04604808,0.00038577442,0.00060763996,0.0052678916,0.038114414,0.015505083,0.0071830065,0.008044104,0.003559281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.083140045,0.0008828389,0.00054186204,0.0059289807,0.028541805,0.0060205506,0.011649546,0.009716824,0.00023418448],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006359392,0.00006944985,0.030364763,0.00029226393,0.000036773483,0.003055976,0.5176831,0.000372859,0.0007872563,0.35343215,0.022060608,0.071781255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072642535,0.00008919622,0.068315454,0.0025602153,0.00017861612,0.0017764078,0.49881425,0.0010469852,0.0013676503,0.0173797,0.4081221,0.00027688465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95825815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98307526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1390679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1390679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1918992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184642675","doi":"","title":"Access to Assisted Conception: A Call for Legislative Reform in Light of the Modern Family ( Susan Doe v. Attorney General of Canada )","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Law; Telecommunications; Engineering","score_opus":0.05561309867744824,"score_gpt":0.31758578091382206,"score_spread":0.2619726822363738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184642675","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012863557,0.0074934172,0.0012296541,0.93370205,0.0030179727,0.00013063094,0.00021877859,0.0001037822,0.04124022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1311107,0.0066907667,0.003484404,0.80808836,0.003340273,0.00024690852,0.00016777849,0.00009455079,0.046776168],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97842926,0.0027016827,0.0009983365,0.0015901871,0.008872325,0.007408313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96708816,0.014573273,0.0012121842,0.0013163771,0.006936175,0.008873767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021449463,0.00066191156,0.0012173854,0.001446089,0.020541511,0.011471105,0.0082573285,0.0548338,0.0057752854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038765866,0.0013525261,0.0014138529,0.0018588223,0.019690529,0.0061991857,0.007234787,0.04214444,0.00056617375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011541087,0.00015238477,0.0060179005,0.00026659993,0.000066408,0.0017937319,0.01591014,0.0007814037,0.0010472619,0.43203494,0.5076726,0.0341412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026406723,0.00013657572,0.018724155,0.0013696055,0.00016683253,0.0010229951,0.0120989345,0.0014311237,0.0007413475,0.040821884,0.92283714,0.00038526658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92398167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07601833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05144588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2733082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3732677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W318566348","doi":"","title":"\"The Highest Degree of Communion Possible\": Initial Reflections on the Windsor Report 2004","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Faith; Eucharist; Archbishop; Sociology; Law; Theology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1886321861378773,"score_gpt":0.43214272963434847,"score_spread":0.24351054349647117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W318566348","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085136056,0.014537347,0.0008251591,0.67872024,0.007664346,0.00026815358,0.0005394449,0.00007613594,0.21223313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54684263,0.007836424,0.0013078136,0.16199608,0.0040246956,0.00043552002,0.00034339985,0.0002614339,0.27695197],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97500086,0.007238404,0.0011456887,0.0015704919,0.0075064446,0.0075381566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98784024,0.0055402108,0.0009934598,0.00050521054,0.0029296759,0.0021912646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021884568,0.00057768857,0.00038240326,0.0010187799,0.03023806,0.015985698,0.0027870554,0.016870148,0.008380945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026836261,0.0013399165,0.0006066976,0.0015675379,0.012382169,0.0075508533,0.007996929,0.02141594,0.0008884311],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007083385,0.000085368294,0.0033029572,0.00021134439,0.000011826442,0.0011611244,0.18745753,0.000081462415,0.0005924954,0.2009509,0.58703846,0.019035714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015076786,0.000025790352,0.007814599,0.0003468299,0.000004593352,0.00014827811,0.08216118,0.000037083955,0.00022447159,0.0024056316,0.9067589,0.000057487396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5244782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67737156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5244782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02699958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032675136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9566445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185803507","doi":"","title":"Le concept d’autonomie dans l’arrêt Carter c. Canada : Au-delà du libre-choix (The Concept of Autonomy in Carter v Canada: Beyond Free Choice)","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Autonomy; Normative; Personal autonomy; Political science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.008857259914108252,"score_gpt":0.23138877658000362,"score_spread":0.22253151666589538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185803507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14295836,0.005588056,0.006382628,0.046386737,0.00031367625,0.00009423642,0.00039152583,0.00003552054,0.7978492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9413047,0.001079995,0.0008494328,0.0029554677,0.00004689177,0.000034100896,0.00003678847,0.000021769567,0.053670794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975738,0.00046462743,0.000039770068,0.00028281694,0.0007323075,0.0009067904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981248,0.00062329625,0.00013508835,0.00008277127,0.0006690093,0.0003650253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014654136,0.00024243802,0.00023766451,0.0011205577,0.0120746195,0.0055496013,0.0009281996,0.0024998137,0.008223161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028646854,0.00024575018,0.00026307572,0.0016245006,0.02002116,0.0023235315,0.0022093547,0.0040932,0.00029169637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008509303,0.0000027620422,0.00068354356,0.000013869816,0.0000022365266,0.000058459245,0.0061126864,0.00013462582,0.000066036366,0.98606503,0.004582799,0.002269558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004732105,0.000041177354,0.01802332,0.0005296717,0.000041154704,0.00027877462,0.039890062,0.0017002387,0.0006768812,0.2651363,0.6733977,0.00023742551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9640825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97283506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06663212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06663212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07066605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48345214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187241523","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3433234","title":"Reading Beyond the Lines: Oral Understandings and Aboriginal Litigation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Sociology; Gender studies; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.015399270842305919,"score_gpt":0.3044991989559155,"score_spread":0.28909992811360957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3187241523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2157518,0.0061767045,0.0057534305,0.06522957,0.0006822084,0.000057307705,0.000070752205,0.000048391248,0.7062299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96974033,0.001375264,0.00084496575,0.002051291,0.00020298817,0.00003117345,0.000020877553,0.000055170196,0.02567792],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918954,0.0052004564,0.0002186297,0.0004817775,0.001182732,0.0010209301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868075,0.0099108685,0.00090992305,0.00072459935,0.0011120825,0.0005349414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008801782,0.0005025788,0.00056923745,0.0022866335,0.023123426,0.02116884,0.0024672998,0.007838971,0.011508698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025723625,0.0005128884,0.00045977635,0.002092954,0.036794934,0.015172432,0.00727552,0.011587768,0.0007191299],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009785039,0.000015347998,0.00037238895,0.000041990017,0.000002371064,0.00030401084,0.7400517,0.00003479903,0.00008994834,0.25330168,0.0021716782,0.0036043576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000741157,0.000020092917,0.000980859,0.00045772144,0.000015048438,0.00029828536,0.84710604,0.00018178223,0.0002632211,0.08799249,0.06265645,0.00002060616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05959074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060545087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05959074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007501963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008899188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118487716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189177118","doi":"","title":"L’acte de juger à l’âge séculier : le cas d’April dans AC c Manitoba (Judging at the Age of Secularism: The Case of April in AC v Manitoba)","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Political science; Secularism; Supreme court; Art; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03235136236783248,"score_gpt":0.26892949411132466,"score_spread":0.23657813174349218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189177118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78695947,0.0026997786,0.000458029,0.08028473,0.0003755619,0.000080930084,0.00006493526,0.000015129819,0.12906142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637757,0.0006437299,0.00017241362,0.007327834,0.000041501506,0.000019906052,0.0000110925375,0.000011426898,0.027996559],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968252,0.00059767254,0.0000453265,0.00013741972,0.00020754269,0.0021868448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99720085,0.0005485933,0.000263183,0.00008854479,0.0005244037,0.0013744693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002443058,0.0002883809,0.00027790325,0.00064512395,0.038936555,0.0071552545,0.001683986,0.0043725506,0.00465709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031930793,0.00042975278,0.0002751382,0.0011713483,0.018693628,0.0014980563,0.0068608723,0.0074706073,0.00023200849],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065048975,0.000064330576,0.038951702,0.000090944486,0.000022598506,0.007948892,0.62457395,0.00023489175,0.0009769577,0.29281333,0.02070785,0.013549546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000148922445,0.00003595,0.035472136,0.0003177977,0.000023529034,0.00079576485,0.71114254,0.000173965,0.00039295363,0.005702635,0.24587321,0.00005466054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9146824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9717936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08531761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038664263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06539253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2805302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191849360","doi":"10.29173/mlj1063","title":"Apology Legislation: Should it be Safe to Apologize in Manitoba? An Assessment of Bill 202","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Political science; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.12224495057116484,"score_gpt":0.41204143584445063,"score_spread":0.2897964852732858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191849360","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30486843,0.017966198,0.0011732812,0.33948275,0.0011179129,0.0005105465,0.0007155116,0.00009462362,0.33407074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7243166,0.01160732,0.0027813273,0.114188455,0.00034299179,0.0003420432,0.0003628675,0.000040387626,0.14601801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935348,0.0009881065,0.00017169029,0.00026759817,0.0030280412,0.002009804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99226356,0.0016801736,0.00075975066,0.00019884056,0.003213462,0.0018841949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005742259,0.00034006394,0.00030354588,0.0020346649,0.014800363,0.0073169055,0.0029012605,0.005411048,0.0048757186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0108600855,0.00076422974,0.000441356,0.0023283993,0.0059485617,0.0018337021,0.0027485117,0.005045388,0.0005777359],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020125446,0.00049172575,0.105425246,0.00079126307,0.00008050112,0.0031654118,0.036902543,0.001195688,0.0032669532,0.5373067,0.22537385,0.08579882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007851539,0.0002754338,0.29681545,0.0021926067,0.00012676776,0.00073118956,0.05475438,0.0011530048,0.0016760465,0.012125076,0.6299037,0.00016785802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8915814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96571136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.108418584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056095246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1843994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40700138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191956399","doi":"10.22215/etd/2021-14515","title":"Judicial Treaty Federalism and the Reconciliation of Ontario's Duty to Consult","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Treaty; Law; Political science; Parliamentary sovereignty; Sovereignty; Constitution; Judicial review; Supreme court; Dual federalism; Jurisprudence; Duty; Politics","score_opus":0.027718623384907222,"score_gpt":0.3179746946938719,"score_spread":0.2902560713089647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191956399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11540437,0.0031074123,0.00392134,0.049401935,0.0003309298,0.00008590877,0.00023824844,0.00004623372,0.82746357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9458843,0.0013403412,0.001090421,0.0026419123,0.00008044666,0.000030852723,0.00005765923,0.000020666776,0.048853364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927672,0.0012829221,0.00018435244,0.00058917556,0.0026257786,0.0025505184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99507576,0.0014573281,0.00043410793,0.00031014506,0.0022504597,0.00047206983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004199918,0.00018762292,0.00034703765,0.0013494755,0.022760175,0.007118523,0.0014773273,0.002640285,0.0049106665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0129820155,0.00035322082,0.0003017408,0.002315255,0.015244362,0.0024413746,0.0032976624,0.002796203,0.00024060778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010776051,0.000005769699,0.0015956196,0.000026118627,0.0000062938925,0.000113079965,0.016671354,0.00031685553,0.00015623901,0.9655397,0.00831756,0.0072407527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000680277,0.000031687545,0.034522995,0.00058732514,0.00008121811,0.0001934072,0.030466605,0.0022793708,0.00071829755,0.20873989,0.72219884,0.00011236214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9822797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99172485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13969055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13969055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19209434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192204141","doi":"","title":"Spousal Support in Quebec: Resisting the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Antipathy; Jurisdiction; Family law; Legislature; Political science; Law; Autonomy; Child support; Advisory committee; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.036323941955585734,"score_gpt":0.346887269518408,"score_spread":0.31056332756282223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192204141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4742434,0.011740826,0.0032646654,0.3141089,0.00093223626,0.00016379324,0.000649845,0.00013537018,0.19476102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93893987,0.0030602799,0.001130353,0.024963014,0.00009262818,0.000044774722,0.00009471553,0.000025793695,0.031648517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567705,0.0010011751,0.00014777774,0.0003657283,0.001497608,0.0013106931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874979,0.0039160443,0.0008160947,0.0004370184,0.0054348726,0.001898078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054813046,0.00019120947,0.0002853046,0.0013519742,0.021688899,0.005895284,0.0023848463,0.0030300135,0.0038293845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012424305,0.0003756013,0.0002874002,0.001840009,0.0055994303,0.0014312753,0.0019349137,0.0045825997,0.00021026426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012153341,0.00015254167,0.09800999,0.0002722837,0.00006586247,0.0036342132,0.12676582,0.001631401,0.0017153159,0.41278905,0.18478972,0.17005233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006053575,0.00009368166,0.12021436,0.00075289444,0.000082265426,0.00065724313,0.0627746,0.0022695323,0.0011719979,0.008362531,0.8033349,0.00022544824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99861383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11315084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11315084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16107208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82097065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194864473","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Reintegrative Shaming: A Comparison of Indigenous Legal Traditions of Canada and Braithwaite's Theory of Reintegrative Shaming","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Criminology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02603062122942319,"score_gpt":0.2608237617613418,"score_spread":0.23479314053191863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194864473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9352274,0.0015909146,0.00046808677,0.0020446975,0.000037585905,0.000057286634,0.000057565114,0.000006676724,0.06050982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99675614,0.0008007593,0.00017612666,0.00010865232,0.0000043542195,0.000008142562,0.00001980603,0.0000030531635,0.0021228546],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823713,0.00025210023,0.000042608946,0.000105054234,0.00066523714,0.0006978544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790096,0.00046331983,0.00029758053,0.00008734596,0.0007555771,0.000495094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014515497,0.00024266973,0.0003577752,0.0027833513,0.014404057,0.0041538803,0.0016052955,0.0005395321,0.0026520162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040635113,0.00014776658,0.0002614694,0.0040146,0.012203011,0.0013629632,0.0034836112,0.0013056285,0.00006711528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006136669,0.00006375061,0.047032777,0.00018619442,0.0000252959,0.0007584288,0.8559486,0.0001873774,0.00056226406,0.057047322,0.001256771,0.03686979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009252288,0.000035087214,0.16157474,0.00032710415,0.0000384932,0.0003473005,0.8031729,0.00043635583,0.00020953182,0.003964517,0.02983704,0.000047717196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97793466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05370913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05370913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06286004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38968885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195226208","doi":"","title":"Recent Developments in Canadian Criminal Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Mens rea; Law; Reactionary; Criminal law; Supreme court; Political science; Presumption; Presumption of innocence; Excuse; Government (linguistics); Criminology; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02403580796479337,"score_gpt":0.29930517296647025,"score_spread":0.27526936500167687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195226208","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004178829,0.8390623,0.00060980057,0.038753726,0.0026525625,0.000044096923,0.00092722516,0.0000718609,0.11369958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04361242,0.92951244,0.00179089,0.007874132,0.0011562723,0.00003195796,0.00071907334,0.00003769351,0.015265239],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610716,0.00033561207,0.00018837715,0.00034028152,0.002642961,0.00038572866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870908,0.001903265,0.00057306397,0.00018343056,0.009390051,0.0008592738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003563078,0.00067518005,0.00064168364,0.01275472,0.0048278063,0.006096623,0.0015094026,0.0016346377,0.017679103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00968661,0.0003646855,0.0006214109,0.02162125,0.003194423,0.0022814285,0.001315931,0.0020621861,0.0013413791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005901934,0.000051716725,0.0040410054,0.0064037736,0.00006122805,0.0005089416,0.002899802,0.0007792407,0.00043247655,0.098598145,0.26403147,0.62213326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004353386,0.000009751527,0.0057469364,0.0013100294,0.00003340935,0.00017597106,0.0006426428,0.00008505413,0.00006807919,0.0017145715,0.9901849,0.000024202054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96325916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97570795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079332836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.079332836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14267501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5756027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W31961054","doi":"10.1002/jbm.b.34550","title":"Do pregnant women have (living) will?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Living Wills; Legislation; Silence; Law; Health care; Political science","score_opus":0.03250250891501294,"score_gpt":0.27355156146576404,"score_spread":0.2410490525507511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W31961054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18734641,0.1751554,0.004757021,0.26329383,0.011508533,0.00032088876,0.003226291,0.00041760784,0.353974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6700403,0.13137342,0.0053916005,0.08665303,0.0022238933,0.0003499598,0.001058095,0.000104464496,0.102805264],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955326,0.00016928026,0.000024103429,0.000072977964,0.000077688856,0.00010272872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946636,0.00015844488,0.00012422151,0.000054243676,0.00006607302,0.00013054143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000839122,0.00027238176,0.00031779349,0.00031014948,0.0012028848,0.001183291,0.0003089822,0.0014844241,0.026089031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004473684,0.00018280899,0.00020153997,0.00036059896,0.0011559663,0.0015053148,0.001327691,0.0011325787,0.005829801],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040670513,0.00031646332,0.09075366,0.00077221595,0.00010721887,0.010055673,0.010873817,0.00007553869,0.001965359,0.034993272,0.19121553,0.65846455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004151671,0.00028797294,0.03134667,0.0017968509,0.00010483988,0.02277158,0.019645747,0.00010708561,0.00066214224,0.016292118,0.90688115,0.000062340725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00308265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039929096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026089031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003465766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091843767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08727652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196835571","doi":"10.1093/he/9780191926440.003.0017","title":"Entick v Carrington [1765] 95 ER 807, King’s Bench","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Principle of legality; Law; Government (linguistics); History; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.038136527449773576,"score_gpt":0.2498627030724112,"score_spread":0.21172617562263762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196835571","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025604279,0.011594627,0.000368072,0.023234427,0.0014055828,0.00006597494,0.00018695545,0.000029516232,0.9605545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.063340805,0.004309061,0.00043934362,0.052069854,0.00062460464,0.00019739206,0.00010672496,0.000059734168,0.8788524],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997964,0.00036414847,0.00009553437,0.00033251155,0.00074985,0.00049396174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935704,0.00031695527,0.00006102145,0.000040737923,0.0001615703,0.00006268672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018310272,0.0008002784,0.00038198338,0.00164809,0.0076886592,0.0067921933,0.0016262803,0.013457206,0.030671023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004990351,0.00067435374,0.00032909718,0.0015303844,0.0062704613,0.0046841474,0.002356337,0.009082822,0.0070589143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016649117,0.000010311894,0.00014058127,0.00007509926,0.0000029137643,0.00031618134,0.0032690552,0.000047266363,0.000113293594,0.47577244,0.5117532,0.008483065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007523926,0.000007779697,0.00042758227,0.0002717908,0.0000047092103,0.00009616483,0.0008831598,0.000028374214,0.00013276076,0.013581872,0.98454064,0.000017715129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24957176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3899908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24957176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01573649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008535194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49623817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197605928","doi":"","title":"A Right Without a Rights-Holder Is Hollow: Introduction to OHLJ’s Special Issue on Identifying Rights-Bearing Aboriginal Peoples","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Constitution; Human rights; Context (archaeology); Positivism; Political science; Sociology; Indigenous; Section (typography); Dilemma; Philosophy; History; Epistemology","score_opus":0.022592379463507763,"score_gpt":0.3313863645421783,"score_spread":0.3087939850786705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197605928","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068934076,0.11868598,0.0061426917,0.3843766,0.060440138,0.00023764688,0.00040868545,0.00012145601,0.42269334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16855389,0.08312602,0.00876348,0.16583624,0.07953092,0.00041079693,0.00061903265,0.00040837828,0.49275124],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974382,0.0007110854,0.00016225815,0.00037343014,0.0008483318,0.000466552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99651694,0.002213296,0.00012323013,0.00012709618,0.0008103505,0.00020916601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004453047,0.00053289,0.0005601141,0.0018440788,0.009912472,0.008629194,0.0016656362,0.0090080155,0.0083873635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005753582,0.00064031425,0.0005947828,0.0016561736,0.0084600905,0.008209095,0.003364335,0.010293255,0.0017756907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014181255,0.000046142326,0.0009865994,0.00032624046,0.000005116545,0.0003948114,0.013905508,0.00005641783,0.0002368281,0.35084224,0.60443693,0.028748943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022305828,0.000008775739,0.0016097204,0.0003821866,0.00000423726,0.00009569648,0.0034788484,0.000054292712,0.000060495106,0.011968714,0.9823139,0.000021005657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08876742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16447172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08876742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0081123365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007631762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17650145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198273099","doi":"","title":"The Conscientious Objection of Medical Practitioners to the CPSO's 'Effective Referral' Requirement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Conscientious objector; Subject (documents); Referral; Political science; Conscience; Politics; Law; Sociology; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.026068323574175933,"score_gpt":0.3416659872455638,"score_spread":0.31559766367138786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198273099","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034135208,0.00092281896,0.005981299,0.6908387,0.003691753,0.00023616238,0.00008443804,0.00014584367,0.26396385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38253808,0.00032414473,0.0034687899,0.5722898,0.0028776783,0.00027406425,0.00004073275,0.00006999366,0.03811666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94571835,0.012885578,0.0041937106,0.0057331147,0.02351416,0.007954948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9091203,0.06060921,0.006274272,0.0070056072,0.010194808,0.006795729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039738048,0.0003845798,0.0007935756,0.0009820492,0.012032169,0.008448834,0.0037806865,0.05141683,0.0048624976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1080747,0.0010529221,0.001199048,0.0011098117,0.028417064,0.0040295185,0.0077328156,0.03330678,0.0012908292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006431017,0.000062676925,0.003106807,0.000104209445,0.000023673305,0.0025316016,0.017204886,0.0002114003,0.0012100636,0.84015584,0.12605166,0.009272877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025902374,0.0001739587,0.010479643,0.0007312653,0.00005394414,0.002959974,0.007264567,0.0014251606,0.0009912648,0.17160216,0.8037992,0.00025982363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10782339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12827224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10782339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012830995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02908447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21439153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199050573","doi":"","title":"GENDER DISCRIMINATION FORBIDDEN: FROM THE GLENS OF ANGUS TO A CHURCH NEAR YOU","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Charter; Context (archaeology); Law; Relation (database); Labour law; Sexual orientation; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.08696858760603318,"score_gpt":0.34978628546165436,"score_spread":0.26281769785562115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199050573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28855208,0.07446308,0.00053511444,0.1044237,0.0031006483,0.00008383882,0.00041789052,0.00002820703,0.5283955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9017665,0.016358906,0.00028021188,0.0287994,0.0002652851,0.0000234852,0.00012592062,0.000024557532,0.052355763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963259,0.0006485679,0.00009882084,0.00027765095,0.001302011,0.0013471168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99695325,0.0010264934,0.00033463817,0.00013090337,0.0010128927,0.00054177607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030579052,0.00019149721,0.00036469175,0.0014013228,0.014392972,0.004984291,0.0012881106,0.0028247624,0.0030145696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005365741,0.00022201317,0.00018647009,0.0018588533,0.0093488395,0.0014085626,0.0015893764,0.0041306065,0.00030248592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011517036,0.000056967157,0.016877532,0.0007080505,0.00002890812,0.0030516905,0.16761586,0.00009085935,0.0011534936,0.49452886,0.19166024,0.12411243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001707641,0.000032895812,0.047159947,0.0012931521,0.000066306784,0.00069894706,0.13730755,0.000041249183,0.0006702939,0.0065732016,0.8060826,0.000056800072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9350736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98015106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9350736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023090243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05959357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1675322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199198463","doi":"","title":"\"A Delicate Necessity\": 'Bruker v. Marcovitz' and the Problem of Jewish Divorce","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RUNE (Research UNE)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Judaism; Wife; Law; Supreme court; Multiculturalism; Sociology; Political science; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11108367263083446,"score_gpt":0.38662980825360693,"score_spread":0.27554613562277247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199198463","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08420053,0.01059733,0.0010375429,0.6802424,0.0009944793,0.0000278632,0.000045261302,0.000028309865,0.22282627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8531121,0.001870362,0.00039459177,0.12597027,0.0007600782,0.000042866246,0.000015831178,0.00001916589,0.017814713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99506384,0.002414736,0.000090955655,0.0003770288,0.0005805121,0.0014728475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968844,0.0019798712,0.00019866574,0.00011141429,0.00029596256,0.00052966643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007305032,0.0003080889,0.00042889334,0.0008623514,0.022051152,0.009165279,0.002209895,0.016901217,0.0036896716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011974319,0.00034916372,0.00040607576,0.00087383046,0.02382241,0.004917972,0.0047061495,0.012588327,0.00027515684],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018259352,0.0000149275575,0.001332586,0.000018509081,0.0000065374193,0.00082380313,0.0106110675,0.00005462424,0.00008572538,0.94835544,0.03477091,0.003907527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016748025,0.00006676087,0.008897237,0.0007988276,0.00006759906,0.0020682262,0.08343707,0.0008860913,0.000759053,0.4955318,0.4071605,0.00015942444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18456964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30860445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18456964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010704291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012761872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3669907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199360233","doi":"","title":"Faire Basculer Le Climat De Profilage Social À Ottawa : Le Programme De Contestation Des Contraventions (The Ottawa Ticket Defence Program: Using Legal Advocacy to Challenge the Social Profiling of Street-Involved People )","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ticket; Art","score_opus":0.03951730474143296,"score_gpt":0.3258653075712138,"score_spread":0.28634800282978085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199360233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6590611,0.0021634283,0.0020168698,0.085682474,0.00050546776,0.001092749,0.0008458786,0.00009590487,0.24853621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87629104,0.00047556468,0.0016381124,0.003086991,0.000036556212,0.00034028332,0.0001478502,0.000032914104,0.11795073],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940866,0.0012700204,0.00014309821,0.0005610724,0.00092401943,0.0030151438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99047416,0.002299823,0.00045730485,0.00055067625,0.0020584208,0.004159611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005717343,0.00036593626,0.0002486226,0.0011589482,0.02384192,0.0074146246,0.0022992908,0.0037053651,0.01123088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009061278,0.0005950023,0.00043156487,0.0009940261,0.010493106,0.0019801266,0.0074557937,0.0037316123,0.00060448755],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005317908,0.00046551749,0.13751866,0.0007175671,0.00013675973,0.0024821337,0.29179293,0.002495587,0.003510087,0.28018898,0.13446191,0.1456981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010678299,0.0002638131,0.198347,0.00046597322,0.000104487975,0.00021922529,0.16918442,0.0009213187,0.0017628691,0.005255532,0.6231854,0.00018307791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9728759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.989785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09750802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09750802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19536671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7074735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199977730","doi":"10.29173/mlj1156","title":"Robson JA: The Manitoba Court of Appeal in the Robson Era","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.05152063232510616,"score_gpt":0.29100070515820375,"score_spread":0.23948007283309758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199977730","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045951195,0.021602258,0.0009084345,0.6892695,0.0071983533,0.00022026412,0.00058620615,0.00009428978,0.23416956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28957534,0.008897691,0.0014211193,0.26318866,0.0021131195,0.0003091512,0.00023095787,0.00029598366,0.4339679],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915513,0.0014831587,0.00034582434,0.00074082764,0.0020288518,0.0038501224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890476,0.0028721842,0.00050562614,0.00026279566,0.0041391985,0.0031725834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008102241,0.00079663773,0.0012103566,0.0024014567,0.05815625,0.017085182,0.0053153983,0.032421652,0.03010491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027099477,0.0019258483,0.0010677772,0.0033978103,0.011387876,0.0057143704,0.007988996,0.027498119,0.003225704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001451741,0.000111387424,0.008317398,0.00011495031,0.00008943115,0.006376295,0.020234512,0.00026887926,0.00071488647,0.2904302,0.659309,0.01388779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009921823,0.00003955755,0.02771067,0.0013499896,0.00016295043,0.00091223815,0.051485725,0.00042756638,0.0005625992,0.024341041,0.8925969,0.00031155936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93002564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97890043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06997436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058519803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17489485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42459285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200317807","doi":"","title":"Caring Society v Canada: Neoliberalism, Social Reproduction, and Indigenous Child Welfare","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Neoliberalism (international relations); Welfare; Reproduction; Social reproduction; Political science; Politics; Social Welfare; Tribunal; Social work; Government (linguistics); Economic growth; Sociology; Political economy; Public administration; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.012769026574899024,"score_gpt":0.26648434185182324,"score_spread":0.2537153152769242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200317807","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13991928,0.010956009,0.0011345088,0.2005279,0.0004203969,0.00004753086,0.00014626955,0.000031291587,0.64681685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95649767,0.0026882682,0.0003532848,0.013941352,0.00009964095,0.000028597939,0.00002509539,0.000017957458,0.026348209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955634,0.0007149035,0.000055210567,0.000293961,0.001197511,0.0021750594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983596,0.0005430647,0.00014662552,0.000080283804,0.00035324,0.0005171847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026696902,0.00028805446,0.00031752695,0.0009122812,0.027704893,0.0076365527,0.001502217,0.0035306686,0.0054377015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003590911,0.00017641162,0.00021851753,0.0017623511,0.057423357,0.00294926,0.004735569,0.0054855193,0.00018494022],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006812394,0.000007684272,0.0007469807,0.000021365015,0.0000022112872,0.00012724445,0.028876297,0.00006141378,0.00006145081,0.960684,0.005408925,0.0039956067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051960265,0.000029088696,0.016329786,0.0006657676,0.000027219092,0.00039152103,0.15994889,0.00046752603,0.00044951894,0.2732828,0.5482418,0.00011407502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9787949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9875015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094687976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.094687976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13333786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68701255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202365505","doi":"","title":"The Legal within Folktales: Embedded Law in Indigenous and French Canadian Oral Stories","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fulbright Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Folklore; Archetype; Object (grammar); Oral tradition; Storytelling; Law; Legal fiction; History; Oral literature; Sociology; Literature; Political science; Anthropology; Narrative; Linguistics; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01167611359239885,"score_gpt":0.27894658232502234,"score_spread":0.2672704687326235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202365505","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7622683,0.004812097,0.0018443416,0.009039029,0.00019909289,0.00006074782,0.0002577177,0.000059996473,0.2214586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891158,0.00087480363,0.00029220572,0.00027443015,0.000019911964,0.000011724801,0.000039085877,0.000025587326,0.009346348],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967578,0.0012784556,0.00005557779,0.00026644464,0.00078421773,0.00085742393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958968,0.0023343344,0.00032116036,0.00017016502,0.0007877781,0.00048973394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024233423,0.0007148703,0.00043116766,0.0033122275,0.028987292,0.014280778,0.0019230408,0.002603438,0.007353055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070293937,0.00035282254,0.00029435876,0.0031144458,0.029957475,0.0043353103,0.0046364362,0.003059054,0.0003390035],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015996673,0.000010991365,0.0009931017,0.000046190988,0.0000039877928,0.0007444418,0.95614815,0.000050878458,0.0002367358,0.0354518,0.0014827771,0.004814954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026941511,0.00000898184,0.003680592,0.00016735979,0.000010294756,0.00034915053,0.8965749,0.00011220734,0.00023530313,0.0019945852,0.096836075,0.000027845588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.914149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94867766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08585101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053265966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020493962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38647342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203621158","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12540","title":"Identifying Coercive Control in Canadian Family Law: A Required Analysis in Determining the Best Interests of the Child","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Control (management); Psychology; Family law; Best interests; Psychological intervention; Political science; Law; Criminology; Social psychology; Computer science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.05914237393214094,"score_gpt":0.35307707261047466,"score_spread":0.2939346986783337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203621158","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010166207,0.90868825,0.0016056523,0.031033223,0.0008707933,0.00018691356,0.00034413819,0.000011563353,0.047093205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25035685,0.72927314,0.0069186445,0.008180993,0.00032688768,0.00015366469,0.00033351145,0.000025755166,0.0044305134],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97125137,0.007260484,0.0022240134,0.0012806089,0.016096117,0.0018873382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92808574,0.032149404,0.0030011486,0.0015489608,0.034330763,0.00088408426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032580502,0.000585471,0.0012138133,0.015633313,0.0099446075,0.009393229,0.0034102467,0.00214875,0.0016957071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06715012,0.0006560573,0.0008755061,0.01599067,0.010702464,0.0037581658,0.0022240896,0.002898161,0.00014252913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007405024,0.000041645628,0.012758314,0.027449347,0.00035186036,0.0009862336,0.03224701,0.0010819371,0.00085821946,0.34711897,0.059578218,0.5174542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037370457,0.00005840772,0.05916592,0.0816341,0.0010371783,0.00085259625,0.02799391,0.0008752753,0.0015184924,0.032551683,0.7940475,0.00022762825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96959764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9874071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10612999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10612999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29927528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77003056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208071220","doi":"10.4324/9781315604954-19","title":"From Implicitly Christian to Neoliberal: The Moral Foundations of Canadian Law Exposed by the Case of Prostitution","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Law; Political science; Criminology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.05264705387871729,"score_gpt":0.29969582069050904,"score_spread":0.24704876681179175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208071220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021023178,0.0222725,0.0017327303,0.058985755,0.0009049358,0.00005595269,0.00010677765,0.000036472808,0.89488167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7824071,0.014032188,0.0022019125,0.010729756,0.0004151771,0.00006070336,0.000087794644,0.00010885926,0.18995664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975132,0.0004975854,0.000028978195,0.00022176217,0.0010358446,0.0007025877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868244,0.0004556054,0.00005185564,0.00007828937,0.0004929752,0.00023880019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023979784,0.00063716335,0.00040315167,0.0023358425,0.028736915,0.010292458,0.0018824412,0.004664795,0.0060236217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004046217,0.0004175832,0.0003055784,0.0039942334,0.04212931,0.004288778,0.0027211301,0.006453426,0.00049261557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055082264,0.000008013016,0.00016768267,0.000024382878,0.0000016568439,0.00009347875,0.020864185,0.000105637395,0.00004929133,0.9558447,0.016511867,0.0063236663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012805074,0.000011030897,0.0028722906,0.00036152525,0.000010886156,0.0001968597,0.01999681,0.0006534619,0.00013934891,0.26394793,0.7117349,0.00006213434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9815777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9896479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17302799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17302799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14776124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95917034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209542695","doi":"10.14288/bcs.vi211.196250","title":"Who are the “Aboriginal Peoples of Canada”? Case Comment on R. v. Desautel, 2021 SCC 17","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Publishing; Political science; Law; Media studies; Library science; History; Genealogy; Sociology","score_opus":0.03235341945398313,"score_gpt":0.3282163222785328,"score_spread":0.2958629028245497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209542695","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023744142,0.008623934,0.00033048957,0.6951867,0.005778158,0.0001510165,0.0004819333,0.00008129865,0.26562232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14386496,0.004210414,0.0003344918,0.55448455,0.0013265185,0.00018846548,0.000127842,0.00010522336,0.29535758],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940584,0.000643726,0.0001316132,0.00066651753,0.0018783961,0.0026214297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656785,0.0010957902,0.00014350696,0.00009510929,0.001366257,0.00073153205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032714738,0.0008068302,0.0008441476,0.0012054249,0.058498237,0.006523711,0.004127448,0.026965339,0.010145375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0079419,0.000952925,0.00081006263,0.0018316923,0.01146122,0.002522775,0.003915921,0.020066848,0.0013954198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037895246,0.000021314549,0.0017355161,0.000119870514,0.000012063998,0.0043224255,0.04838386,0.00014473879,0.00029784782,0.089127794,0.84910524,0.0066913585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011652067,0.000011630696,0.0025054608,0.00032470102,0.000023481927,0.0009575844,0.055313736,0.00010294948,0.00025238039,0.0033140087,0.9370978,0.00008467109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97736096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98716706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058498237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05762002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09862451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41806448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210450248","doi":"","title":"Le droit constitutionnel comme vecteur de transformation sociale. Le cas de la conjugalité au Canada (Constitutional Law as a Vector of Social Change. The Case of Conjugality in Canada)","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01907583138281838,"score_gpt":0.2742780483338952,"score_spread":0.2552022169510768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210450248","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14808656,0.0046417937,0.004048393,0.0295488,0.00020375235,0.00007602162,0.00018158334,0.00005794599,0.8131552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9520537,0.00072666694,0.00051806035,0.0006609699,0.000030228151,0.000014187389,0.000022439479,0.000017923307,0.045955956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976545,0.00042234216,0.000028699033,0.00022857996,0.00049884216,0.0011671933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992192,0.00014611329,0.000064691056,0.000065430155,0.00029586066,0.00020869888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012163381,0.0002367201,0.00020151923,0.0012701125,0.01665426,0.010725398,0.0009767695,0.0020789101,0.0067616156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020534974,0.00019779644,0.00028245494,0.002058237,0.037672997,0.0020895626,0.0031629752,0.002437238,0.00033185267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062509193,0.0000037455886,0.0011443697,0.000011342099,0.000002115311,0.00012661071,0.009533973,0.00019458674,0.00010112178,0.98214495,0.0023872172,0.0043437653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028509943,0.000030036525,0.02193678,0.0002482432,0.000035212837,0.00031488188,0.069101445,0.0017450599,0.00082466647,0.20251419,0.70313114,0.00008982673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97676677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98242044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116443805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.116443805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0872941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8448629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210542444","doi":"10.1017/9781108914642.019","title":"Entanglement of State and Indigenous Legal Orders in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Political science; Politics; Indigenous; Political philosophy; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Legal realism; Law; Philosophy of law; Legal research; Sociology; Comparative law; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.019209389389319174,"score_gpt":0.21546905457477042,"score_spread":0.19625966518545124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210542444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4127604,0.0061579924,0.0010148704,0.0070706066,0.000079554644,0.00006242952,0.00049505517,0.00005946974,0.57229966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96563995,0.0020104933,0.0005345965,0.000300827,0.000010124002,0.000010543492,0.00010408932,0.000015438849,0.031374052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786586,0.00015298542,0.000034782046,0.00019293925,0.0008564016,0.00089709467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860746,0.0003137001,0.00011827627,0.0000726248,0.00048031026,0.000407552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008539366,0.00021638595,0.00036778304,0.0029605138,0.018138489,0.00794953,0.0011833141,0.00089709443,0.0069938935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026794726,0.00032534247,0.0002618633,0.006917979,0.012902084,0.0018959806,0.004216703,0.001954396,0.00021286908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000444737,0.00003189338,0.014583152,0.00012680257,0.000025524998,0.000624293,0.10502693,0.0013613437,0.00042984684,0.82950467,0.010031379,0.038209718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025625606,0.00003432406,0.13988301,0.0007095638,0.00011561535,0.0005959058,0.18220077,0.0040218085,0.00082384265,0.08264116,0.58875453,0.00019375411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19716711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19716711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15843667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9311724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210646896","doi":"","title":"The Gladue Analysis: Shedding Light on Appropriate Procedures and Sanctions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Indigenous; Political science; Law; Best practice; Supreme court; Perspective (graphical); Work (physics); Criminal code; Sociology; Criminology; Public relations; Criminal law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.009384902660138831,"score_gpt":0.2847708737486343,"score_spread":0.2753859710884955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210646896","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080276065,0.0040362915,0.15500967,0.098279126,0.002238947,0.00066966197,0.00048438337,0.0006511256,0.65835476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8399308,0.0021299608,0.075832166,0.015863234,0.0003288988,0.0005491536,0.00020233922,0.0005790629,0.064584345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9525036,0.024754839,0.0012785842,0.002611575,0.0131816175,0.0056698057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97242403,0.014184676,0.0012905695,0.0029875082,0.00796496,0.0011482614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021387653,0.0006794656,0.0007612471,0.0055629727,0.023848848,0.020703124,0.0056711365,0.008280074,0.006256734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07322442,0.000799114,0.0008234857,0.0033958976,0.033114973,0.011758578,0.014520554,0.014155307,0.0011228577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002010624,0.000020595455,0.0010578736,0.0001020824,0.000005623411,0.00047086563,0.051041882,0.00040984646,0.0003734343,0.9034915,0.016068457,0.02693771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021973883,0.000038841976,0.003926187,0.0017571665,0.00003427403,0.00046187808,0.14498596,0.0020653917,0.0018045839,0.3372575,0.5074518,0.00019453865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27167827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41542137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72832173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026384749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052018423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54019386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211341363","doi":"10.29173/mlj1120","title":"Importing a Canadian Creation: A Comparative Analysis of Evidentiary Rules Governing the Admissibility of Confessions to ‘Mr. Big’","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Urmia University of Medical Sciences","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.06960964652140636,"score_gpt":0.36434134299574683,"score_spread":0.2947316964743405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211341363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5797309,0.0015697035,0.0023347572,0.0058846446,0.00006322696,0.00021697611,0.0003243945,0.00003410936,0.40984133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99081075,0.0005413691,0.0010390445,0.00031224953,0.000009973704,0.000020284511,0.00011118787,0.000018335932,0.0071368883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820133,0.002152232,0.0005055286,0.0010887214,0.010521768,0.003718477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.947983,0.01846627,0.0034965724,0.0030371705,0.024507178,0.0025097674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013251354,0.00032333226,0.0005123455,0.0061436826,0.0320993,0.012207011,0.002570484,0.0024453844,0.0043564877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044839043,0.0004311619,0.0006358151,0.007157795,0.020114921,0.0026682268,0.004192478,0.0033181643,0.00019650633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025782367,0.00010165921,0.046933487,0.00033416133,0.00012431374,0.001916854,0.27013168,0.0018694097,0.002503949,0.5897517,0.012366199,0.073708795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008223383,0.000100740974,0.37576762,0.0007803193,0.00039625255,0.0010377842,0.2620503,0.0028389918,0.0029722769,0.028964382,0.32451555,0.0004935068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98755324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99554354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1321898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1321898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17602769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9591086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211707403","doi":"10.4324/9781351002387-8","title":"Indigenous feminist legal theory","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Feminist legal theory; Feminist theory; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Feminism; Ecology","score_opus":0.029037627182332604,"score_gpt":0.29346869530988723,"score_spread":0.2644310681275546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211707403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004563982,0.0053273668,0.0029931923,0.015376639,0.00031991402,0.000026632757,0.00006804812,0.000027091195,0.97129714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4673639,0.013046816,0.0061143544,0.0073480927,0.00043470933,0.00013283502,0.00012639018,0.000108070446,0.50532484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981987,0.00044725998,0.00002127794,0.00018991427,0.00064771745,0.00049516285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924916,0.00030450925,0.000037499187,0.000040388248,0.0002567367,0.00011169797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021766257,0.00037248604,0.00027221636,0.0018086385,0.01486198,0.0049328334,0.0017588575,0.0015979573,0.012432072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016467464,0.0001510333,0.00026475455,0.0016446679,0.024211004,0.0027186312,0.0021006705,0.0024658216,0.0010134281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010689047,0.000003483623,0.00007227931,0.00002291827,5.396845e-7,0.00006151876,0.011069925,0.00004881022,0.00003533298,0.97546524,0.008744967,0.0044739656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019100853,0.0000038310113,0.00058934645,0.00020112665,0.0000027762887,0.000109700464,0.012260822,0.00019041561,0.00010099086,0.1307157,0.8558153,0.0000080497775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6257966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70018715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6257966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039303396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027456684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7528143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213348931","doi":"","title":"Tracking Freedom of Conscience in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista General de Derecho Canónico y Derecho Eclesiástico del Estado - ISSN 1696-9669","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Conscience; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.031942409741512245,"score_gpt":0.2995063659590496,"score_spread":0.26756395621753737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213348931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9154835,0.0011748724,0.00051367964,0.004109598,0.00008079181,0.00013364713,0.005869988,0.000048095168,0.07258584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834985,0.0004680433,0.00035277056,0.00024895693,0.000008457729,0.000046224533,0.0012263735,0.0000142644085,0.014136489],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621177,0.00032944707,0.0001013524,0.0002897578,0.0016343775,0.0014333973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98404133,0.0014224208,0.0016232647,0.00048762237,0.008838158,0.0035871416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022170795,0.00020814966,0.00037225743,0.005117768,0.009207351,0.0044343295,0.0012413989,0.0007896929,0.004103213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011142028,0.00018823502,0.00029657313,0.008035932,0.0023304361,0.0010258723,0.0034076401,0.0012333709,0.00036738845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019506087,0.00013259593,0.75004363,0.00017313952,0.00006985696,0.0005547343,0.07341219,0.0010487096,0.00059491175,0.034962665,0.04572185,0.09309066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008181314,0.000022046534,0.8731091,0.00018515614,0.000016224514,0.000070773305,0.045472953,0.0010103384,0.00033471122,0.00096668274,0.07871904,0.0000848678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99526334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99782676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09535432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09535432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.113940306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6918472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215614503","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0028","title":"On the breach: Identifying infringements of section 35 rights","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Scrutiny; Legislature; Constitution; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0310557196913512,"score_gpt":0.27036531051999246,"score_spread":0.23930959082864126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215614503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3107149,0.0036151647,0.06699064,0.030462546,0.00025867147,0.0004385617,0.0002505471,0.00015398063,0.58711493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93910205,0.001671988,0.026175546,0.004770704,0.000083592786,0.00010203464,0.00017073772,0.000063716725,0.027859699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97267514,0.005661297,0.0010513249,0.0015388367,0.013868968,0.0052043786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97505957,0.011751718,0.0027723385,0.0022098816,0.0074913735,0.0007151114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017792003,0.00070805755,0.0007193952,0.008357628,0.013596974,0.016746964,0.0019145765,0.005723847,0.0031142149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04681882,0.00045156517,0.00081206905,0.0049416935,0.028205605,0.012738332,0.010200409,0.0066825124,0.00050996715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033550794,0.000019720184,0.013187187,0.000057213725,0.0000083405475,0.00077820243,0.045555208,0.00033995733,0.0008543002,0.8962303,0.0038831106,0.039052933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018484552,0.000108170294,0.06321914,0.0018566956,0.00015489345,0.0016000909,0.12281277,0.005851,0.008091057,0.5987375,0.19724761,0.00030260824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46893802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50895244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46893802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02850071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042642664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.932417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217148283","doi":"","title":"Health Insurance, a False Dichotomy and a Negative Right to Abortion in Canada's Maritime Provinces","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Political science; Medicine; Actuarial science; Business; Pregnancy; Biology","score_opus":0.009402013738292563,"score_gpt":0.28266529734058654,"score_spread":0.27326328360229396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217148283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6969684,0.002856041,0.00050391187,0.052346803,0.00012820675,0.00003235576,0.00024684667,0.000011998161,0.2469055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891284,0.0007488952,0.00017083237,0.0020518163,0.000009499022,0.000005770268,0.000029140254,0.0000066701396,0.007848905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714607,0.00032193295,0.000040675204,0.00017761778,0.00071110897,0.0016026197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974298,0.00065812655,0.00024950667,0.000076776436,0.00067565095,0.0009102584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018361756,0.00018406674,0.0003063336,0.0013161647,0.03521317,0.0075267493,0.0012733727,0.001587349,0.0031100386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045700558,0.00033122083,0.00024605964,0.0021162562,0.023826808,0.0014424338,0.0035045273,0.0040836344,0.000120424826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080858335,0.00005984993,0.048176404,0.000063081934,0.000018385555,0.0009928001,0.17500433,0.00055730937,0.0005503818,0.7379825,0.013393041,0.023121066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005532123,0.000043436627,0.15302433,0.00069178885,0.0000789651,0.0005680718,0.56016284,0.001448666,0.0008562238,0.07396753,0.20892918,0.00017361184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99701095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99867165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11514191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11514191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20772436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.835417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217622965","doi":"10.29173/mlj892","title":"Is Justice Delayed, Justice Denied - Changing the Administration of the Winnipeg Family Violence Court","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; Administration of justice; Law; Political science; Administration (probate law); Sociology","score_opus":0.03596584371651016,"score_gpt":0.3041123822861501,"score_spread":0.26814653856963994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217622965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.798416,0.0019024144,0.0006773822,0.1660859,0.0017117768,0.00009485556,0.00012124727,0.000025947451,0.030964466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98391694,0.00070430816,0.00035843233,0.009143804,0.0001274302,0.000021228707,0.000029066388,0.000019664263,0.0056792065],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889948,0.003557197,0.00034268692,0.00091395766,0.0018677624,0.004323681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874204,0.0020971645,0.002570408,0.0005638545,0.0019416442,0.0054065417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061106035,0.00018929766,0.00039425507,0.00047786548,0.011255021,0.007823236,0.0023062045,0.0033646452,0.003148337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03996046,0.00050973217,0.0002537252,0.00094004546,0.0074335216,0.0047842115,0.004310327,0.0052211783,0.00035184994],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069098244,0.00045479432,0.14462739,0.00046812883,0.00011987961,0.008401332,0.5259657,0.00077464705,0.004388903,0.09886649,0.08449722,0.13074459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011539295,0.00026308172,0.15850036,0.000888595,0.0001053668,0.0013531888,0.54124254,0.0004862373,0.0013882238,0.007883665,0.2875283,0.00024511555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7279174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85924566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27208263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032677498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06838438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54736996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W325273685","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Spare the child","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Corporal punishment; Spare time; Subject (documents); Sociology; Law; Psychology; Media studies; Criminology; Medicine; Political science; Humanities; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.015173071596037375,"score_gpt":0.26574861832853236,"score_spread":0.250575546732495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W325273685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002879722,0.23128033,0.000688406,0.027997646,0.04451258,0.00013623277,0.0011878916,0.0005567281,0.6933522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015498243,0.08392084,0.00049638166,0.012071489,0.007538082,0.000051328636,0.00069404044,0.00026278044,0.8934152],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994004,0.00007464738,0.00003620727,0.00009056268,0.0003406578,0.000057586283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868447,0.00026592243,0.000071950024,0.00011210276,0.00062709884,0.00023851595],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046099245,0.0010253834,0.0010336904,0.0014935284,0.0013499671,0.004484421,0.0017934504,0.0032032947,0.34191176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037057633,0.00041011383,0.00049704954,0.0021454133,0.00088351255,0.0027586585,0.0018449594,0.003003469,0.33784947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046610207,0.0000047565795,0.000016256,0.00014303788,0.0000011483904,0.000029617664,0.000024931727,0.000012502384,0.000037022186,0.00083031255,0.9531114,0.04578437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011601475,0.0000017655703,0.000057136738,0.00019486154,9.213986e-7,0.00007236143,0.000019998895,0.0000029026533,0.00000866749,0.00016667137,0.9994721,0.0000014847998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012196085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03370342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34191176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001985473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003135551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.938683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W335530575","doi":"","title":"Aline Grenon and Louise Bélanger-Hardy, eds. Elements of Quebec civil law: A comparison with the common law of Canada / Éléments de common law canadienne","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Common law","score_opus":0.02019686419435443,"score_gpt":0.30882088386877005,"score_spread":0.28862401967441564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W335530575","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004197156,0.8151394,0.001137878,0.09599313,0.0033853573,0.000032587646,0.00037609733,0.000045102897,0.07969333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052613832,0.87883836,0.0014218679,0.0041513974,0.002048553,0.00003463135,0.0002748509,0.00006563833,0.060550813],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988288,0.00028093875,0.00003018001,0.00010424538,0.000599212,0.00015675672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974911,0.0008595724,0.00011956907,0.000041819985,0.0011368473,0.00035095308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022376326,0.0009790559,0.00072291354,0.0047881883,0.005800189,0.00806206,0.0013616191,0.0028599848,0.019663127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029428238,0.0005940639,0.0003478064,0.010075185,0.004414479,0.006478069,0.0012534657,0.0021977946,0.0025946319],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005934575,0.000054677916,0.0036169156,0.00097344385,0.000028698661,0.00022125116,0.01171498,0.00076032325,0.00013632695,0.07832107,0.68678355,0.21732938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010399632,0.000012111381,0.017002452,0.0019442646,0.00002601442,0.00019294176,0.017502818,0.0004873517,0.00010000985,0.008613811,0.9540615,0.000046258752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91745573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9631551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08254427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03107831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027131135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22548997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W338172472","doi":"10.4324/9780429445620","title":"Legal Feminisms: theory and practice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03440998740964374,"score_gpt":0.35255494952350286,"score_spread":0.3181449621138591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W338172472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047856555,0.124445714,0.00998186,0.120187335,0.002309955,0.000097303986,0.00007315376,0.000108675355,0.7380104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5978774,0.12723608,0.014639706,0.029140603,0.0040759635,0.0010109,0.000108758715,0.00031624536,0.22559436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99069995,0.0068914336,0.00019106547,0.00049564504,0.0011562444,0.00056567555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946413,0.004165259,0.00027178248,0.00026285698,0.00029554032,0.00036318155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006579588,0.00070705655,0.0007895386,0.002305102,0.010366987,0.014062021,0.0018497795,0.0055434047,0.011714718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073091653,0.0004992256,0.00035611322,0.003169347,0.053823147,0.008175709,0.007091394,0.00561815,0.0026814013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036367892,0.000013469416,0.000120469405,0.0001224361,0.0000013360053,0.000092631126,0.020977795,0.00006175473,0.00002924156,0.94202465,0.020440813,0.016111715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007072905,0.000012537137,0.00018380648,0.0013306234,0.000001686161,0.00018181518,0.03102276,0.00010900969,0.000069024856,0.252012,0.7150621,0.0000074901936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046367203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041819518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014062021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00919846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008124102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0667398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W340541376","doi":"","title":"Adiaphora: The Achilles Heel of the Windsor Report","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Law; Affection; Morality; Scrutiny; Sociology; Oath; Blessing; Obligation; Philosophy; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.04555931434003382,"score_gpt":0.36050943163171173,"score_spread":0.31495011729167793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W340541376","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070634657,0.031228203,0.00066741137,0.6104916,0.033935163,0.00009583819,0.0006376214,0.00016032696,0.3157204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09096363,0.023526382,0.0013775342,0.16647893,0.015717404,0.00014129093,0.0007646807,0.00036075825,0.7006694],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917943,0.0015152295,0.00037468364,0.00086181547,0.0040496723,0.0014043095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900738,0.002865869,0.00056347926,0.00089321885,0.003843242,0.0017604138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0083173085,0.0006031739,0.0003478392,0.0014175249,0.01221996,0.013537853,0.0017880634,0.010600434,0.02458767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02156513,0.00073335133,0.00036063525,0.0009473933,0.006126517,0.009352209,0.003676161,0.009855606,0.0053599575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029068835,0.000021864851,0.00058312697,0.0000620021,0.0000037787777,0.00013425152,0.0009069036,0.000016647185,0.0001010739,0.08175424,0.8973375,0.01904962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050206586,0.000010166906,0.00084861694,0.00021084881,0.0000019831398,0.00004617704,0.0010387904,0.000015774318,0.000054250268,0.0024724053,0.9952845,0.0000116553265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15266879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21189637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15266879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055705244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017624307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30356026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W346843878","doi":"","title":"La Spécificité Patrimoniale De L’Union De Fait : Le Libre Choix Et Ses « Dommages Collatéraux » (The Patrimonial Specificity of the De Facto Union: Free Choice and 'Collateral Damage')","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.01554706558513847,"score_gpt":0.2718794179956099,"score_spread":0.2563323524104714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W346843878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15923361,0.0034212333,0.0063164504,0.014317178,0.00019410688,0.000034775367,0.00009586379,0.000022693011,0.8163641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8812459,0.00045392825,0.00037675048,0.0006053748,0.000047892034,0.000017395672,0.00001963428,0.000012232581,0.11722086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829024,0.00046844207,0.000038201764,0.0003129942,0.00035152948,0.00053863024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991819,0.00030548463,0.000104793864,0.00011362115,0.00019156674,0.00010261351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015280443,0.00025990652,0.00023778893,0.0006450683,0.0087929955,0.0066900244,0.00068130356,0.0020720342,0.01292717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021748585,0.00022383299,0.00021810102,0.0008447688,0.019951064,0.0020159532,0.0025358517,0.0026982748,0.00080085406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011591114,0.0000041522103,0.0006022481,0.000012867395,0.0000020505297,0.00011580535,0.0074372333,0.000121239296,0.00012237817,0.9849555,0.0021422887,0.004472687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038913782,0.000067656816,0.020856075,0.0004271885,0.000026044007,0.00057819166,0.024533011,0.0012540761,0.0011017803,0.30441472,0.646623,0.00007929006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35447788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43955654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35447788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018275546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0096789375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7048292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W348736023","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1208","title":"Charter Eviction: Litigating Out of House and Home","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Charter; Eviction; Appeal; Political science; Law; Justiciability; Politics","score_opus":0.07835314801454228,"score_gpt":0.36866566256107675,"score_spread":0.29031251454653445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W348736023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24913608,0.0038273453,0.008256107,0.11006821,0.0015107093,0.000184074,0.00015522672,0.0001218865,0.62674046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9106945,0.00088899,0.0011120586,0.032612797,0.00025748886,0.000055762936,0.000042749372,0.000039608945,0.054296028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99045485,0.0021333077,0.00018131972,0.0007588067,0.0024206867,0.0040509985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966569,0.0018167552,0.0001488238,0.00021146843,0.00079972233,0.0003662815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061842417,0.00044484762,0.00054846384,0.0008490284,0.027368916,0.007936879,0.0030298522,0.013136847,0.0029517077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012445163,0.00043390892,0.0007277719,0.00089202635,0.019956976,0.0032790005,0.0047672046,0.013563387,0.0002720716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003688428,0.000053984368,0.0032217558,0.00004356076,0.000026255788,0.004666527,0.050727367,0.00056158047,0.00057219947,0.873293,0.055624813,0.011171977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012513627,0.00010386219,0.011183145,0.00063865737,0.00022899978,0.002132943,0.11771435,0.003645908,0.0038516119,0.18693727,0.67318314,0.00025504877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8322069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8723173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8322069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031063389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06203564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3375625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W379435648","doi":"10.26530/oapen_569531","title":"Law, Privacy and Surveillance in Canada in the Post-Snowden Era","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Electronic surveillance; Internet privacy; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.0268775673353654,"score_gpt":0.2799775066940706,"score_spread":0.25309993935870523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W379435648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037883285,0.06381178,0.0016381323,0.16974296,0.002846563,0.000101680904,0.00066087116,0.00017769304,0.72313714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4347929,0.07016835,0.00254617,0.035473008,0.00045677074,0.000095646785,0.00044392355,0.00020476754,0.45581847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945484,0.00043924272,0.00008672072,0.00031447803,0.0028401094,0.0017711208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99573493,0.0009218202,0.00014564616,0.0001254994,0.0022725756,0.0007995446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023175473,0.0005382387,0.0005972272,0.002347537,0.04028888,0.017749239,0.0021564665,0.0035855747,0.0069241766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006356287,0.00042268838,0.00044536125,0.00787373,0.02157765,0.0038315242,0.0040059797,0.0059206933,0.0006147739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001839331,0.000027768438,0.0015442248,0.00014303831,0.000013027271,0.00047461048,0.056870054,0.0005407884,0.00016392623,0.68315214,0.21363224,0.04341976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004869021,0.0000073831143,0.0030777873,0.00042123403,0.000015814914,0.00010935522,0.031249067,0.00026131756,0.00014535886,0.016659288,0.9479942,0.000054274904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99832517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99905103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2994481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2994481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.45280638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8125409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W37987877","doi":"10.21991/c94m3j","title":"BLACK V. CHRÉTIEN AND THE CONTROL OF THE ROYAL PREROGATIVE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Bishops; Prerogative; Irish; Law; Political science; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02540320267826208,"score_gpt":0.25683856222810253,"score_spread":0.23143535954984046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W37987877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023566768,0.013067098,0.0005319514,0.16599646,0.0016509485,0.000040821462,0.0000394039,0.000036798243,0.7950697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56442684,0.0032652498,0.00043946193,0.06923306,0.0009890153,0.000077011704,0.000019072259,0.00009079814,0.36145952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99290013,0.0023071023,0.00014394941,0.00080730085,0.0015255997,0.0023159222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941983,0.0035003552,0.00033738048,0.00030382766,0.00082108146,0.0008390079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061107273,0.00028442222,0.0004932008,0.0007524327,0.021956015,0.00879388,0.0014808804,0.01086216,0.01416247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014093637,0.0005490659,0.00025052187,0.0007067106,0.020937555,0.004245268,0.0035136247,0.011718281,0.001717979],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003978597,0.00001801175,0.00019928817,0.000031717325,0.000004228202,0.00019036623,0.005542563,0.000078260215,0.00017877044,0.90915155,0.07798695,0.0065785362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051107963,0.000036996742,0.0016083515,0.00033176204,0.00001142769,0.00019851534,0.005620084,0.00019191395,0.0005225247,0.12160905,0.86973006,0.000088171924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20730847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31972298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20730847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01347694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018263899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4122036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W380316835","doi":"","title":"An Unauthorized Admiralty Court in British Columbia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œWashington historical quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; History; High Court; Political science","score_opus":0.016889002882237537,"score_gpt":0.2800695360922619,"score_spread":0.2631805332100243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W380316835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48880428,0.0024913682,0.0005574384,0.030135298,0.0005378967,0.0001104925,0.00028950017,0.00009430991,0.47697943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85877615,0.0009576488,0.00027453667,0.0058026924,0.00003860801,0.000034449706,0.000100025296,0.000031722422,0.13398409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970578,0.00031380047,0.000040256542,0.00017882815,0.0005414933,0.0018677927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99653804,0.0005467755,0.00011675912,0.000113338545,0.0011532595,0.0015318327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00098203,0.00026999196,0.00042593066,0.0010053564,0.047385473,0.008202266,0.0020895347,0.004503899,0.012226857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043763113,0.000755758,0.000224337,0.0016017243,0.006016372,0.001334629,0.004746441,0.00786289,0.00090137206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046059123,0.0004681439,0.07770472,0.0005221666,0.00015720326,0.062248506,0.101751514,0.0027824875,0.005506103,0.34334016,0.3028762,0.10218221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001519698,0.00012680599,0.08982783,0.0008552265,0.0001553006,0.0023391899,0.17425448,0.0021846024,0.0019313156,0.014998559,0.7128173,0.00035745205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9846875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99735427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06784388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06784388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.097907886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49224406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W406165647","doi":"","title":"M. E. Reisner, ed. — The Diary of a Country Clergyman, 1848-1851: James Reid","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Histoire sociale","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Art; Theology; Sociology","score_opus":0.020054432946000265,"score_gpt":0.2720973835061603,"score_spread":0.25204295056016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W406165647","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030569553,0.9100779,0.00061742624,0.029152544,0.0047666365,0.000016320202,0.0011420153,0.000054685515,0.051115606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0593143,0.77430326,0.0019737356,0.0033763438,0.0026410597,0.00006261033,0.0007144451,0.00012439323,0.15748988],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994987,0.0002048039,0.000046265977,0.0000688744,0.00013195923,0.000049278347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991171,0.00039947528,0.00012295395,0.00005940043,0.00016740119,0.0001336892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013174589,0.00056540314,0.0005889382,0.0027345717,0.0027234475,0.0036060624,0.00071616896,0.0012600536,0.015066231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003081796,0.0005567526,0.0001540969,0.0061411527,0.0020296962,0.0058336826,0.0012184631,0.0015040688,0.0046901535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043669635,0.000010501954,0.0010015885,0.00047824072,0.0000066146745,0.00008573649,0.011243547,0.000076774566,0.000088969995,0.01580197,0.81255555,0.15860683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010059604,0.0000029108205,0.0013546718,0.00048400532,0.0000018833251,0.000084950385,0.0028759255,0.0000087544795,0.000033303557,0.0009412734,0.9942058,0.0000056252948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048454378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14260018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048454378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021204413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030481333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09634465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205364919","doi":"10.1590/1809-43412021v18a706","title":"Indigenous Legal Resurgence as a Path to Reconciliation: Three Case Studies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vibrant Virtual Brazilian Anthropology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Honour; Autonomy; Sovereignty; Law; Political science; Self-determination; Indigenous rights; Intervention (counseling); Plaintiff; Human rights; Sociology; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.04644267438590562,"score_gpt":0.37521793838071854,"score_spread":0.32877526399481294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205364919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.859362,0.0033756758,0.0027688115,0.013301307,0.00028378924,0.0004982114,0.00009923243,0.00003128836,0.12027971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98247427,0.002445534,0.001309562,0.0015286556,0.00009020368,0.00012776001,0.000030423029,0.000014163602,0.0119795315],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99436593,0.0022142718,0.00018562569,0.00030399024,0.0012800613,0.0016500833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919757,0.0051930514,0.00071471225,0.00034696565,0.0009864375,0.00078303635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059649213,0.00045511627,0.00046569644,0.002907755,0.02753464,0.0061827945,0.0033706708,0.0076033575,0.0038477124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015056893,0.0004309022,0.00048024207,0.0036770292,0.014181676,0.0028953545,0.006354978,0.006405153,0.00024075716],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006210832,0.00054419436,0.0130789755,0.00043049068,0.000036650763,0.08526796,0.5624388,0.0012056289,0.00080619386,0.29547432,0.009374331,0.03128036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003322839,0.00010366947,0.012459976,0.00082056323,0.00007501299,0.015915716,0.7712097,0.0013478287,0.0015353006,0.014895788,0.18148416,0.0001191142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47621158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68883544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47621158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030880397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017393779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94687945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205521505","doi":"10.7202/1084133ar","title":"Domestic Contracts and Family Law Exceptionalism: An Historical Perspective","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exceptionalism; Supreme court; Law; Trilogy; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Family law; Ideology; Common law; Sociology; Law and economics; History","score_opus":0.04775251357453432,"score_gpt":0.33325647215850085,"score_spread":0.28550395858396654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205521505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32872725,0.059876032,0.0062446794,0.07190415,0.0004665373,0.000044629283,0.00035571982,0.000052203548,0.5323288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869522,0.007115203,0.00027250772,0.0010013214,0.00007842476,0.000007433117,0.000027086155,0.000009152792,0.004536737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748373,0.0007733243,0.000054847656,0.00027306078,0.00047739325,0.0009375912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997908,0.00078281504,0.0002354227,0.00010855372,0.00053292495,0.00043232285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002289441,0.00016961344,0.00022136424,0.002099843,0.015077448,0.00483707,0.0012116203,0.0015178409,0.0023631959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003931475,0.00016582267,0.00012949185,0.0026849206,0.033875287,0.003524542,0.0027082968,0.0028346665,0.000085082975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000465638,0.000008918922,0.0019670725,0.00003130019,0.000002371429,0.0003346689,0.05879173,0.00018972483,0.000037642065,0.9231086,0.0034877406,0.012035557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052016853,0.00002738594,0.02066545,0.0007730823,0.000012528909,0.0011870638,0.11806122,0.00070940703,0.0003158423,0.14486773,0.7133107,0.0000643931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78042096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75765043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78042096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05240458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021968694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44174433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205661382","doi":"10.7202/1044784ar","title":"OBLIGATIONS","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.08676104256253049,"score_gpt":0.2861900552721924,"score_spread":0.1994290127096619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205661382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034913456,0.0005564921,0.0044444855,0.013372743,0.0011278895,0.00016547648,0.00034961218,0.000079877915,0.97641206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13921615,0.0006151108,0.005276393,0.023712706,0.0008960561,0.0012660192,0.00046238423,0.00018512477,0.8283701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.987861,0.0032723332,0.00066814886,0.0020185641,0.0039899847,0.002189913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956256,0.0014936404,0.00024530917,0.000803126,0.00146555,0.00036670789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074075563,0.0007256313,0.00072747964,0.0012430879,0.010332472,0.0104008755,0.0018906567,0.01051918,0.048884034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01634124,0.0007434552,0.0010921895,0.0010265738,0.011545686,0.0066315443,0.005476441,0.012997127,0.012031194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007041036,0.000008802445,0.000101888814,0.000014825462,0.0000020973225,0.00004610859,0.001274524,0.000032835313,0.00008800083,0.97562206,0.019815845,0.0029859622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021872233,0.000015025814,0.00096117996,0.000115211245,0.00000853686,0.00015429678,0.001270544,0.00013750531,0.00035426256,0.2051364,0.79179245,0.00003272585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045532357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042831194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048884034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007797964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013489377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16353339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205697385","doi":"10.1215/00141801-9404373","title":"Decolonizing Discipline: Children, Corporal Punishment, Christian Theologies, and Reconciliation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnohistory","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ontario Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Corporal punishment; Sociology; Power (physics); Punishment (psychology); Law; Criminology; History; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.03732363463630916,"score_gpt":0.30646208276299847,"score_spread":0.2691384481266893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205697385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06110862,0.17189014,0.003044219,0.092848405,0.007857339,0.00014121295,0.0001881067,0.00014084564,0.66278106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.644349,0.073467836,0.0030121128,0.017314166,0.0041141044,0.00028182907,0.00016696664,0.0003880148,0.25690603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823654,0.0009144965,0.000047834368,0.00014290433,0.0004281424,0.00023003784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843115,0.0009664596,0.00017208485,0.00009677521,0.00014036079,0.00019314818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017845129,0.0004573364,0.0004581227,0.0010323854,0.010364723,0.008962168,0.001434161,0.0021433707,0.005414167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003388559,0.0002753975,0.00019740172,0.0015067568,0.026261523,0.004850892,0.00440689,0.0061213216,0.00046768723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014930879,0.000029631987,0.0006173772,0.00032400017,0.000007021507,0.00029753754,0.24503392,0.00009742797,0.00008929059,0.6022393,0.11933603,0.0319136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055728406,0.000019185263,0.0016400771,0.0008018763,0.0000045146726,0.00029846624,0.06412522,0.00004125704,0.00010515179,0.023816217,0.9091257,0.000016862934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022844708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060460284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022844708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010372697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007092784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07525957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206099060","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u16484","title":"Fricker, Rt Rev. Joachim Carl, (1 Dec. 1927–28 Oct. 2018), a Suffragan Bishop of Toronto (Bishop of Credit Valley), 1985–95","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities; Art history","score_opus":0.04410510492442354,"score_gpt":0.32212053802848856,"score_spread":0.278015433104065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206099060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028647939,0.045429293,0.00043506347,0.14733754,0.012369691,0.00018289301,0.009258894,0.0002748869,0.7818469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0080307815,0.005588198,0.000120818,0.021871518,0.00065758836,0.0001390226,0.00075776543,0.00012177905,0.9627125],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988262,0.00015509577,0.000054830045,0.00019078233,0.00042472963,0.00034843574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990565,0.00024429554,0.00004451562,0.000040041617,0.00051086035,0.00010384214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016260474,0.00082623557,0.00047336836,0.0012171668,0.014128902,0.005586605,0.0016912161,0.009971705,0.12055814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005789648,0.00068957673,0.00045203872,0.0014554072,0.0016285295,0.003506548,0.0029537375,0.0069443607,0.058406226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008522759,0.000004495219,0.000099937926,0.000034265482,8.571335e-7,0.00005199884,0.00042118537,0.000009362045,0.000018352066,0.0063848444,0.9897316,0.0032345064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029709377,0.000002640764,0.000882786,0.00015064812,0.0000017435601,0.000013992442,0.00069608184,0.000008867712,0.000037626778,0.0007467804,0.99744666,0.0000092822465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41809782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71415895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58190215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008394624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012462029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83132845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206126061","doi":"10.3886/icpsr03342","title":"CBS News Monthly Poll #1, April 2001","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"ICPSR Data Holdings","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental science; Meteorology; History","score_opus":0.10291645827608262,"score_gpt":0.3639484480485557,"score_spread":0.2610319897724731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206126061","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018012384,0.00015825975,0.00008212349,0.0007052543,0.0002538906,0.000088979265,0.9863669,0.00023561121,0.010307778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0039017645,0.00029931392,0.00028336068,0.00043347463,0.0001624589,0.0004705107,0.96504116,0.00015846643,0.029249497],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860793,0.00015794928,0.00015711773,0.00020280528,0.00067262404,0.00020163313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99364257,0.0012555888,0.0007435231,0.0006165513,0.0030952843,0.0006464783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020295805,0.001040953,0.00087827165,0.0069913142,0.0014706055,0.004984088,0.0014086049,0.0017232479,0.07490172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008688257,0.00084914046,0.0004198918,0.015521854,0.0002083522,0.0015612876,0.00093039894,0.0018473775,0.09279448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067200555,0.000028011036,0.0011004886,0.00013002506,0.0000043775194,0.000014921407,0.000040167255,0.000039120587,0.000030057305,0.00017241217,0.9944794,0.0038937756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015602063,0.00004215642,0.04687266,0.00017309285,0.00002449179,0.000030224066,0.00040804534,0.00033905354,0.00042259984,0.0002505626,0.95125717,0.000023943088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06666175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11228136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07490172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029956119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028867647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25057125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206165822","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.17004091.v1","title":"Non-Consensual, Deceitful and Misattributed Paternity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"North Bristol NHS Trust; Amicus Therapeutics; Accident Compensation Corporation","keywords":"Statutory law; Tort; Context (archaeology); Liability; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.033566421608171707,"score_gpt":0.3327959033337531,"score_spread":0.2992294817255814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206165822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27965295,0.012873416,0.011027436,0.023108976,0.00085587695,0.000116746065,0.00024268401,0.000023212468,0.6720987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9041256,0.008735712,0.00244925,0.0022885872,0.0001938508,0.00006559229,0.0001197349,0.000019721669,0.082001984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790394,0.0008749607,0.00011640292,0.00023584062,0.0006635144,0.00020519717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649256,0.0018335634,0.0005903276,0.0004584597,0.000393384,0.0002317029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026502914,0.00019317947,0.00024005737,0.0006039036,0.0024542124,0.0035385366,0.0006465366,0.00088115945,0.0061961077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008005985,0.00016511473,0.00022466578,0.0006312573,0.009772099,0.002913728,0.0024163967,0.0023054827,0.0007591629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039170445,0.000088675275,0.01209872,0.0002447639,0.000008425207,0.0004690405,0.04626278,0.00034941948,0.0005978681,0.85696423,0.007708059,0.07516877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001733749,0.00017103885,0.07241736,0.0023761764,0.00003431298,0.003920093,0.07354348,0.0013302385,0.0028572832,0.5192399,0.3240068,0.00008604985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033629155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006780051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061961077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001840554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025259242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020728052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206433164","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501755262.003.0001","title":"Introduction","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cornell University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Early modern period; Period (music); Geography; History; Economic history; Genealogy; Law; Ancient history; Art","score_opus":0.05516664713762885,"score_gpt":0.23172673296215324,"score_spread":0.17656008582452437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206433164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000981661,0.005372763,0.001960509,0.0069464,0.0038089529,0.000095773954,0.0017406349,0.00043318304,0.97866017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0063672327,0.004338168,0.0016407283,0.0028144366,0.00095981837,0.00008804531,0.001795385,0.00022915468,0.981767],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990723,0.00012582977,0.000043829426,0.00022577867,0.00040498635,0.00012730318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925107,0.00013135918,0.000041581225,0.000102098544,0.00032618703,0.00014777847],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064392027,0.000754817,0.0005512704,0.0012037256,0.0026542812,0.0053470945,0.0017232798,0.0029160092,0.48192686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024028267,0.00026551646,0.0004461584,0.0014479775,0.0010737547,0.003927268,0.0030219578,0.0022660398,0.27307242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003122843,0.000052021256,0.00038776276,0.00026202208,0.000003279064,0.00018507289,0.001309167,0.00010310174,0.00031583602,0.11997923,0.7274601,0.14991122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.925443e-7,0.000004798388,0.000106089254,0.00006977783,5.051352e-7,0.000059215894,0.0001310596,0.000008484448,0.000023296381,0.0024658742,0.99712795,0.0000018384324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035994074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047853603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48192686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022627446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023004583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7389685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206748978","doi":"10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah19021.pub2","title":"<i>Bucellarii</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Encyclopedia of Ancient History","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.024692494397666704,"score_gpt":0.2646223713587126,"score_spread":0.23992987696104587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206748978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00109685,0.031193865,0.00044678495,0.003874436,0.006080782,0.00005118954,0.017346427,0.0005438765,0.9393657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01705213,0.033053912,0.00085681514,0.00112696,0.004290642,0.00014985948,0.0156326,0.0012132352,0.92662376],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996997,0.00004735008,0.000021751632,0.00004784422,0.00014244956,0.000040878702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995598,0.00013298837,0.00005458186,0.000057996793,0.00014020367,0.000054412423],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034098316,0.0007638042,0.000753774,0.0038461192,0.0015640596,0.0034397626,0.0006537813,0.0006729032,0.36386472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014307206,0.00019448111,0.00018336168,0.0071140793,0.0008251502,0.0025757267,0.001850589,0.0011983595,0.12906016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022999466,0.000005655031,0.00012802772,0.0005786032,0.0000017399536,0.00003298489,0.00038095363,0.000023990338,0.00006836597,0.012050532,0.9193956,0.0673106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.460609e-7,0.0000020580792,0.00040623013,0.0001685055,4.713064e-7,0.000024672927,0.0000786541,0.0000055895116,0.000023389395,0.00030698476,0.9989813,0.000001420693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009364482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01580763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36386472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011309696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010535623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9073698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4207081363","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.17004091","title":"Non-Consensual, Deceitful and Misattributed Paternity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"North Bristol NHS Trust; Amicus Therapeutics; Accident Compensation Corporation","keywords":"Statutory law; Tort; Context (archaeology); Liability; Political science; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.033566421608171707,"score_gpt":0.3327959033337531,"score_spread":0.2992294817255814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4207081363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27965295,0.012873416,0.011027436,0.023108976,0.00085587695,0.000116746065,0.00024268401,0.000023212468,0.6720987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9041256,0.008735712,0.00244925,0.0022885872,0.0001938508,0.00006559229,0.0001197349,0.000019721669,0.082001984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790394,0.0008749607,0.00011640292,0.00023584062,0.0006635144,0.00020519717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649256,0.0018335634,0.0005903276,0.0004584597,0.000393384,0.0002317029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026502914,0.00019317947,0.00024005737,0.0006039036,0.0024542124,0.0035385366,0.0006465366,0.00088115945,0.0061961077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008005985,0.00016511473,0.00022466578,0.0006312573,0.009772099,0.002913728,0.0024163967,0.0023054827,0.0007591629],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039170445,0.000088675275,0.01209872,0.0002447639,0.000008425207,0.0004690405,0.04626278,0.00034941948,0.0005978681,0.85696423,0.007708059,0.07516877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001733749,0.00017103885,0.07241736,0.0023761764,0.00003431298,0.003920093,0.07354348,0.0013302385,0.0028572832,0.5192399,0.3240068,0.00008604985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033629155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006780051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061961077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001840554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025259242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020728052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210654285","doi":"10.1093/obo/9780195399301-0461","title":"Bathsua Makin","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Renaissance and Reformation","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hebrew; Brother; Nothing; Classics; Literature; History; Philosophy; Art; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.039375730456230065,"score_gpt":0.31427782144400224,"score_spread":0.2749020909877722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210654285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017531982,0.029668577,0.000658409,0.023595044,0.016952211,0.000069256355,0.0008653715,0.00032220304,0.91033703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018906709,0.0031844368,0.00021954955,0.0017774486,0.00043697486,0.000017882297,0.00016221084,0.000112325884,0.9751824],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978894,0.000025219624,0.000010777615,0.00006360459,0.000055703542,0.000055821707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996588,0.000026681406,0.00002371555,0.000019198626,0.00010071397,0.00017089695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024206821,0.00058517256,0.0002909653,0.0004994001,0.0047326395,0.0017030824,0.00040623004,0.0010167325,0.24113105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092754484,0.00029066697,0.00013985648,0.0004593961,0.00066406716,0.0017963705,0.0022861343,0.0015968683,0.0705935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001392288,0.000036472935,0.0014429997,0.00037096458,0.0000044858007,0.0011534325,0.0038319759,0.000032798118,0.00170873,0.011825676,0.87840503,0.10104815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018265561,0.000008905461,0.0008561264,0.00006011177,9.794935e-7,0.00019506345,0.0006482154,0.000009006955,0.00011445349,0.000183299,0.99791867,0.000003283793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005900255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024955029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24113105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001506231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013948646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80666375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212797079","doi":"10.26686/jnzs.ins33.7382","title":"Finding Our Way to the Island: Critical Reflections from Two Emerging Pacific Legal Academics in Aotearoa","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of New Zealand studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Victoria University; University of Canterbury; Victoria University of Wellington; York University; University of Otago; Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand","keywords":"Aotearoa; Scholarship; Sociology; Jurisprudence; Political science; Project commissioning; Pacific studies; Publishing; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.12926313776817436,"score_gpt":0.4431104570463726,"score_spread":0.3138473192781982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212797079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71286005,0.0030239823,0.001973488,0.22772579,0.003949437,0.000305185,0.000058717604,0.000049188853,0.05005416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9439591,0.002528783,0.0013742762,0.030023394,0.00057958876,0.00020149718,0.000031132855,0.00010920497,0.021192975],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98824537,0.006544735,0.00029638803,0.00081179774,0.001663434,0.0024382481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97025025,0.011104332,0.0016428606,0.0005927268,0.0058568865,0.010552848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015770558,0.0010363474,0.001255952,0.0034646895,0.07609348,0.019319244,0.0045676376,0.009823829,0.0034060178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031418454,0.0010340406,0.0006699606,0.0032093802,0.04547178,0.011089121,0.02173259,0.041043296,0.00040402],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055429227,0.000020604555,0.0004856599,0.000021866434,0.0000016257186,0.0007789669,0.9922186,0.000007775168,0.00009095934,0.0035851153,0.0018156035,0.0009676502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010901231,0.0000047884614,0.00015394668,0.00004113378,0.0000013161414,0.00006683756,0.9882626,0.000013198426,0.00003097239,0.00046478602,0.01095256,0.000006833228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09298008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17755033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09298008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019774472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03227529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18487775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213086076","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab129","title":"Judicial amendment and our constitutional lives: A reply to Emmett Macfarlane","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutionalism; Law; Secession; Judicial interpretation; Constitutional theory; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Supreme court; Normative; Judicial review; Originalism; Judicial restraint; Constitutional interpretation; Judicial activism; Constitutional amendment; Constitutional law; Sociology; Philosophy; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.03469044570718269,"score_gpt":0.3524611504676337,"score_spread":0.317770704760451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213086076","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042414474,0.012370863,0.00070746127,0.96137285,0.0020872974,0.000004995902,0.000026494161,0.000009298152,0.019179326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5027755,0.018228315,0.0013145572,0.4444746,0.011972593,0.00006180387,0.000051843745,0.00010825463,0.021012474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98961824,0.006748622,0.00021834133,0.0010556933,0.001592232,0.0007667671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9636801,0.030732226,0.0008311565,0.0010104923,0.0027380586,0.0010079544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01400794,0.000412732,0.0008679818,0.0014093784,0.0128798755,0.008983161,0.0023682162,0.02153325,0.0052195317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03467939,0.00046048558,0.0005429276,0.0017419652,0.04853342,0.0144026205,0.0050362735,0.02834322,0.00069338037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018738088,0.000011736939,0.00010874897,0.00005263744,0.000004796312,0.00021215703,0.017318163,0.00013099029,0.000046135257,0.87391275,0.1045928,0.0035902997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002926553,0.000019544843,0.00043545323,0.00066468347,0.0000076531405,0.00027143495,0.017920066,0.00030603967,0.00020196856,0.3698644,0.61021906,0.00006051134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044779353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03227259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044779353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0168804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008391588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12247646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213371845","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u186681","title":"Gwynne, Hon. John Wellington, (30 March 1814–7 Jan. 1902), Puisne Judge, Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; History; Art history","score_opus":0.031100056983118008,"score_gpt":0.30104816515770344,"score_spread":0.2699481081745854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213371845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035126917,0.023167197,0.00049145886,0.01974524,0.009164769,0.00012271677,0.006053286,0.00027981834,0.93746287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019803655,0.0019274235,0.000053480246,0.00037773326,0.00007089949,0.0000049306873,0.00016812049,0.00004518541,0.99537176],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999652,0.00001704772,0.000012917192,0.00007118821,0.00014080206,0.0001060416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951434,0.000027782147,0.000012999603,0.000012220723,0.00032695697,0.00010570765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003926896,0.0006063091,0.0004945776,0.001231431,0.009138288,0.0027692136,0.0008803969,0.0012421736,0.26170895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010961655,0.00042344598,0.00021247893,0.0014997248,0.0008014357,0.0015005476,0.0014130339,0.001831544,0.07477476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013683111,0.000005072847,0.00030804725,0.00003777113,0.0000013348492,0.00014042942,0.0003904649,0.00002721183,0.000060646304,0.0035883153,0.9744803,0.020946808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.018271e-7,0.0000015580905,0.0005757455,0.00004612001,6.667936e-7,0.00003106318,0.000284352,0.0000057615252,0.000033034154,0.000121575766,0.9988961,0.000003256109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7727228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95933485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26170895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009005004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010047634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87550366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213383224","doi":"10.5040/9781474201148","title":"Constitutionalising Secession","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Constitutionalism; Political science; Law; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.047245267385436385,"score_gpt":0.3040293719049521,"score_spread":0.2567841045195157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213383224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0086586,0.00383917,0.015221908,0.006882892,0.0009453301,0.00010738478,0.00008112132,0.00012968862,0.9641338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6949248,0.0073528634,0.009156666,0.009352563,0.0015171366,0.0004028785,0.0003762446,0.00034221442,0.27657464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971584,0.0010257043,0.00017251709,0.00049639103,0.00074127247,0.0004058057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983144,0.0007868496,0.00009428253,0.0004652882,0.0002342858,0.000104911574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028352798,0.00042389383,0.0004419092,0.0007191056,0.0033522488,0.0071559795,0.0010776083,0.0028115807,0.01127298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006400436,0.00031963876,0.00045424164,0.00090313394,0.021874217,0.0075482875,0.004654094,0.006553909,0.0017471827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019693587,0.000002062424,0.000037005524,0.00001728443,6.65373e-7,0.000020422907,0.0011952155,0.00005392365,0.00008507939,0.99213433,0.0020331815,0.004418837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009018707,0.00002714737,0.00033937758,0.00022709055,0.000006541705,0.00016311179,0.00219017,0.000290023,0.0005849548,0.5126407,0.48350564,0.000016228347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044918717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039878837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01127298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00485866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050102556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03771186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214608750","doi":"10.1080/17432200.2021.2018850","title":"Walking the Law throughout the Journey of Nishiyuu","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Material Religion","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Parliament; Colonialism; Sociology; Law; Corporate governance; Gender studies; Media studies; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.03082741436507311,"score_gpt":0.3274804231641635,"score_spread":0.29665300879909035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214608750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96367866,0.00045888277,0.00076412,0.0028835323,0.000095851814,0.000052820484,0.00006214492,0.000024691315,0.031979337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891139,0.00041387678,0.0009693884,0.00034275875,0.000010785377,0.000040277093,0.000035769455,0.000020526022,0.009052617],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995889,0.000094674724,0.000017926697,0.000042024392,0.000052187603,0.00020431708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934465,0.00008964697,0.00007318029,0.00003133829,0.0000968499,0.00036438595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068413815,0.00031347864,0.0003574077,0.00041716304,0.015588614,0.0029115735,0.00061963603,0.0008073093,0.004320688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010434004,0.00027491114,0.00021787593,0.0007164263,0.0059990017,0.0019940443,0.0048327455,0.0017414959,0.0003387328],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000350425,0.000045829038,0.024581173,0.00011196983,0.00000903901,0.0042001703,0.9449772,0.00006403713,0.0030368723,0.007936337,0.0025065276,0.012495712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024324183,0.000040483206,0.016547,0.00010615601,0.000008295337,0.0005971131,0.9415529,0.00006180409,0.00032219884,0.00068796147,0.040051326,0.000022373606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10089365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27544942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10089365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026988664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048805885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20061278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220654799","doi":"10.1017/s0008423922000051","title":"The Place of Constitutional Conventions in the Constitutional Architecture, and in the Courts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Justiciability; Law; Invocation; Political science; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Politics; Enforcement; Meaning (existential); Political question; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029833266156804313,"score_gpt":0.313623137289305,"score_spread":0.2837898711325007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220654799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085849345,0.010081508,0.03473902,0.07622924,0.00050931546,0.00006153394,0.0001536874,0.0001483458,0.792228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98999876,0.0008024194,0.0021502539,0.00084801787,0.00015335182,0.000031432384,0.000017587767,0.000034183886,0.0059639905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98508966,0.00981104,0.00046352315,0.0010915354,0.0021731441,0.0013711011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836194,0.008737076,0.0011702906,0.0024995895,0.002700951,0.0012726065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0135969035,0.00028022807,0.0004872193,0.0030531278,0.010737867,0.022904258,0.0016389185,0.003945971,0.0036626696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019343281,0.00051108125,0.00029864954,0.003566767,0.112644896,0.011496503,0.004565234,0.007056742,0.00029071464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015105151,0.0000010254682,0.00008161871,0.0000030805106,8.156284e-7,0.000006764387,0.0009648199,0.0000806459,0.00002611262,0.9978235,0.0002511872,0.0007588785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011057544,0.000008373988,0.0009195518,0.00008642934,0.00000943726,0.000024492445,0.0021879089,0.0005586142,0.00015400586,0.9470174,0.048999626,0.000023126613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09103217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08671372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97637343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023626558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022701904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18100464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220733525","doi":"10.5663/aps.v10i1.29399","title":"Determining the “Core of Indianness:” A Feminist Political Economy of NIL/TU,O v. BCGEU","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"aboriginal policy studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Queen's University; University of Ottawa; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Jurisdiction; Political science; Supreme court; Law; Politics; Sociology; Trade union; Political economy; Economics","score_opus":0.06603053227389463,"score_gpt":0.4205393379276544,"score_spread":0.35450880565375975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220733525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13277334,0.002421863,0.0066112312,0.12211275,0.00044053065,0.000056649656,0.00005951487,0.000034998302,0.73548913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654737,0.00038293088,0.0006418151,0.012525802,0.0001968884,0.00004980664,0.000010556425,0.00002759983,0.02069095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99304855,0.002792637,0.00008366214,0.0006819971,0.00127868,0.002114461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971047,0.0019403854,0.00020872291,0.00012630693,0.00026590162,0.0003539975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006568794,0.0002394445,0.00036362803,0.0010101465,0.020884924,0.012955165,0.0014548086,0.0052278894,0.0034989517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007836935,0.0003974036,0.0004144425,0.0009785659,0.05319235,0.005251994,0.006852297,0.011930334,0.00024000197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005399512,0.0000048185784,0.00018318833,0.0000064294754,8.0237675e-7,0.00008052714,0.020404702,0.00005896292,0.000074210555,0.97706044,0.0011635149,0.0009571686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026975931,0.000034384357,0.0033550072,0.00031316973,0.000026135349,0.0002363109,0.101280905,0.0012129206,0.0011423484,0.5669867,0.32529458,0.000090566355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20451988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2209106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20451988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022088438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014135253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4066589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220943918","doi":"10.1108/s1059-43372022000087a002","title":"Gitxsan Legal Personhood: Gendered","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Indigenous; Perspective (graphical); Legal status; Sociology; Law; Political science; Gender studies; Art","score_opus":0.0645354439522897,"score_gpt":0.30436217583164554,"score_spread":0.23982673187935583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220943918","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19383208,0.006716866,0.0004946846,0.005840333,0.00020022178,0.00001544036,0.000038305272,0.000020808326,0.7928414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9550691,0.002623606,0.0001276793,0.00036964985,0.00003384475,0.000012379274,0.000017113694,0.000011826047,0.041734762],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908435,0.00033825828,0.000013827937,0.00008168601,0.00022786493,0.00025402286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960214,0.00017503052,0.000047098132,0.000026579934,0.00006781924,0.00008141119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072350417,0.00020424364,0.00020864063,0.0008007468,0.006472532,0.005310339,0.0006997465,0.00074542384,0.008949886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001045346,0.00011423299,0.00010437484,0.0012434028,0.023662174,0.0019071174,0.0033499731,0.0018296429,0.00037867887],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011865794,0.000025591622,0.0030016168,0.000105142506,0.0000037363914,0.0010788577,0.5467201,0.000057295543,0.000437971,0.42513415,0.0047385744,0.018685121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004724132,0.000032400727,0.014682965,0.00049661455,0.000007906951,0.0012900853,0.5793234,0.0000907748,0.00041679267,0.031912915,0.37172458,0.000016929482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08230199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1205734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08230199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063256784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038240002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16364586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220979699","doi":"10.1017/s2045381721000265","title":"Ban on religious symbols in the public service: Quebec’s Bill 21 in a global pluralist perspective","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Constitutionalism","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Bill of rights; Political science; Charter; Human rights; Opposition (politics); Pluralism (philosophy); Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.033000358948725786,"score_gpt":0.33170281077739616,"score_spread":0.2987024518286704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220979699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32464433,0.0030206968,0.0011978511,0.19917005,0.0005931948,0.00008407685,0.00035353345,0.000041202078,0.47089502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9356303,0.0005949062,0.00047975604,0.014715228,0.00006272276,0.0000211951,0.0000541338,0.000016719887,0.048425097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970372,0.000660373,0.000050970793,0.0002186196,0.0007277722,0.001305143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960173,0.0014471984,0.00019950066,0.00021190749,0.0012027237,0.0009213137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029293352,0.0002523777,0.0002584067,0.0010869587,0.01849098,0.00759911,0.0012578957,0.0036217147,0.0075804256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034322564,0.00023164533,0.00031231582,0.0015418621,0.017123701,0.0019659924,0.002677962,0.005140348,0.00022116699],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052922358,0.00009256365,0.013080222,0.00008504007,0.000016587583,0.001297267,0.0782438,0.0006236063,0.0010399129,0.8208088,0.05966673,0.02499255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040728228,0.00010969954,0.05840133,0.0004868252,0.000048621805,0.00037638063,0.15104432,0.0008663382,0.0009235729,0.027458308,0.7600377,0.00020609076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9907294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99700576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.903819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09618099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10979663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6978452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220985550","doi":"10.36079/lamintang.ijlapp-0401.325","title":"Liberalism, Law and Social Rights: The Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the Era of Welfare State Restructuring","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law and Public Policy (IJLAPP)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Liberalism; Social equality; Political science; Social rights; Retrenchment; State (computer science); Welfare state; Law and economics; Sociology; Human rights; Politics; Public administration","score_opus":0.02286040960073012,"score_gpt":0.3108209797777214,"score_spread":0.2879605701769913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220985550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07774514,0.012210533,0.017352503,0.3494548,0.0010484005,0.000040505973,0.000078108955,0.00006856573,0.5420015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96078444,0.0022930764,0.0026137242,0.012754253,0.0005732235,0.000040791176,0.000018125538,0.000027746319,0.02089455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951007,0.0022934363,0.000094760464,0.0004278621,0.0012304801,0.00085279625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964418,0.0020996383,0.00024821173,0.00031459364,0.00046053418,0.00043517922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072273184,0.00021299944,0.00030893894,0.0013067655,0.009175282,0.012575709,0.0008534465,0.005265141,0.0019428263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007451349,0.0002484207,0.00032649492,0.0013359002,0.08156772,0.007655508,0.005045194,0.009387255,0.00018207282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016830156,0.0000030206495,0.00004442793,0.0000029053456,3.0548205e-7,0.000013193402,0.0016779874,0.000046475696,0.000020104035,0.996157,0.0009201762,0.0011128124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007993706,0.00000792805,0.00035212634,0.00006686248,0.0000017025102,0.000023347035,0.0021321045,0.0002891682,0.00009015977,0.93360645,0.06341054,0.000011528185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078475006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09042052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97899467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021005357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024654482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15603644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221036540","doi":"10.1108/s1059-43372022000087a005","title":"The Role of the Person in Modern Constitutional Law: How State-inflicted Harms Become Personal","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Scrutiny; Constitutional law; Supreme court; State (computer science); Subject (documents); Political science; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.03640781522578025,"score_gpt":0.2701107428268364,"score_spread":0.23370292760105615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221036540","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02978522,0.010591929,0.005338494,0.016049089,0.00035279652,0.000020965399,0.000028865887,0.00003403484,0.93779856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8879232,0.007167493,0.0018361891,0.00399884,0.0002618022,0.000032521195,0.00003189315,0.00005585286,0.09869221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866855,0.00075815053,0.000018381035,0.00011037217,0.00028375225,0.0001609148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991528,0.0005369435,0.000049103222,0.00008922552,0.00009723941,0.00007481695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017053816,0.00020708366,0.00016955378,0.00088594755,0.004655616,0.0057039354,0.0006708366,0.00171023,0.0051297946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018653868,0.00012557008,0.00018024545,0.0007255511,0.04266864,0.0051726853,0.0022561569,0.0033091246,0.00043864103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014274755,0.0000048717825,0.000094760304,0.000010411279,7.5955506e-7,0.000049309423,0.017830841,0.000047548336,0.00004852139,0.9757134,0.002238257,0.0039598364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061653577,0.000017559818,0.0013406423,0.000300534,0.00000628727,0.0002922514,0.02749377,0.00028240256,0.0003372379,0.48728928,0.48261702,0.000016903821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024373796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032419614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024373796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076018292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003583342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055155396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221065251","doi":"10.4324/9781315253770-18","title":"Some Confusions Concerning Collective Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05709575242918211,"score_gpt":0.309644867238126,"score_spread":0.2525491148089439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221065251","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074482155,0.060219463,0.008580311,0.4074274,0.0060463427,0.000021954504,0.000046294896,0.000079922465,0.5101301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6388003,0.06615015,0.009880599,0.13937809,0.030944835,0.00031310928,0.0001348883,0.00040469904,0.11399328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98516303,0.007734055,0.00046233978,0.0017326502,0.0038538973,0.0010539426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850588,0.011687189,0.00042136703,0.0011295362,0.001135625,0.0005674435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01961023,0.00068987085,0.0010719509,0.003453563,0.014068441,0.016070541,0.0031970218,0.012971375,0.0069765127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015504833,0.0005037894,0.0010131993,0.0046003177,0.067027085,0.029715704,0.009194524,0.019643618,0.0013775547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015434618,0.0000022964725,0.000020498888,0.000021496504,7.1391446e-7,0.000019913843,0.003569265,0.000020866284,0.000010031297,0.98826337,0.0052482183,0.0028218841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046883856,0.0000068216,0.000118011376,0.0002551035,0.0000019349943,0.000114901944,0.0032013494,0.000104499755,0.00003719457,0.78124505,0.21490067,0.0000097621205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00538527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047220364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01961023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007434728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003941618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103710055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225003157","doi":"10.3138/tjt-38.1.131","title":"Toronto School of Theology Theses Completed Academic Year 2020–2021","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033416938481724265,"score_gpt":0.335408199724015,"score_spread":0.3019912612422907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225003157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010031387,0.0037858963,0.00024080071,0.011799901,0.012155902,0.00021246697,0.06529339,0.0007729919,0.9047355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024660388,0.0014006012,0.00017933312,0.00029387287,0.00046816698,0.0000706791,0.00972509,0.00020926833,0.9851869],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725777,0.0001634675,0.00010312814,0.0002468881,0.0015542546,0.00067458296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896562,0.00022560552,0.00021117715,0.0006202912,0.004192044,0.0050946604],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019925353,0.0016267983,0.0012328892,0.004510606,0.007292864,0.010389692,0.0017220228,0.002206133,0.7387303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005446983,0.00092067756,0.00081480824,0.007510229,0.001389941,0.0030686113,0.0045085317,0.0026620938,0.47002122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054953066,0.000005509832,0.00005423073,0.000032131687,6.023904e-7,0.000014075056,0.000050497623,0.000012135679,0.000015003753,0.0016243857,0.9908091,0.007376766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024787237,0.0000034987424,0.0008315701,0.000049350696,5.893687e-7,0.000007823135,0.00010161163,0.000010985175,0.000017931961,0.00021622537,0.998755,0.0000030996787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36358207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64425653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7387303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020981297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039682988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7229316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225873244","doi":"10.22215/etd/2021-14838","title":"Beyond Crown Sovereignty: A doctrinal analysis and critical comparison of Canadian and Anishinaabe political ontologies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Indigenous; Politics; Secularization; Treaty; Political science; Law; Political theology; Constitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.04150313236986807,"score_gpt":0.380434226042626,"score_spread":0.3389310936727579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225873244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27675477,0.0050829668,0.007098282,0.027979411,0.00023394948,0.00016744646,0.00017600194,0.00004320684,0.682464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900955,0.0009029827,0.0012754577,0.0007607558,0.000026701755,0.000038704045,0.00003960353,0.000029168577,0.0068311985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992309,0.0020733161,0.00016336987,0.0005921138,0.0027672453,0.0020950497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99048376,0.005184643,0.0004145373,0.00035195972,0.0030270016,0.0005381038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011247302,0.0006009701,0.0007018085,0.0074990415,0.042712487,0.017849457,0.0029527503,0.0033848817,0.0033134287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015298645,0.00042365672,0.00041010097,0.008695813,0.07800574,0.008445348,0.0059946016,0.006840288,0.00017795253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008918454,0.000005862827,0.0003424156,0.000027572192,0.0000025923262,0.00012364685,0.19916008,0.0000672838,0.00013860184,0.79627126,0.0010773969,0.0027743285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015331609,0.0000121944095,0.005990007,0.00045966983,0.000037406637,0.00016676026,0.6008806,0.00079079863,0.0006649635,0.19192581,0.19898796,0.00006848992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93680626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9516647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14352994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14352994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10963533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229539739","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u5239","title":"Ferris, Rt Rev. Ronald Curry, (born 2 July 1945), Bishop of Algoma, 1996–2008; Assisting Bishop, Anglican Network in Canada, since 2009","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curry; Genealogy; Biology; History; Food science","score_opus":0.03357780247486521,"score_gpt":0.30053430019828403,"score_spread":0.26695649772341884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229539739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015274442,0.11613928,0.00033193486,0.24259302,0.032333516,0.00017371273,0.0033863606,0.00029155705,0.60322315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035248587,0.011660712,0.000103572405,0.015737195,0.0010884725,0.000064925436,0.00021840962,0.00010839668,0.9674934],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989641,0.00014583408,0.000060907816,0.00016849407,0.0004316559,0.00022906868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991447,0.0001442417,0.000060817707,0.000025800315,0.000422397,0.00020210374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010569169,0.0010442919,0.0004212453,0.0012762321,0.008599296,0.0038796898,0.0013743712,0.006034643,0.10622666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031531772,0.0007344294,0.00032745724,0.0014427801,0.0014714713,0.0032943883,0.002463423,0.0060802535,0.05160839],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000389682,0.0000033021395,0.00006491808,0.000022600161,5.388404e-7,0.00001947966,0.00021006278,0.0000069727184,0.000013024642,0.0019247924,0.99352396,0.004206411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016568645,0.0000013084833,0.00043811594,0.00006487385,7.029616e-7,0.000012145225,0.00029512055,0.0000044841013,0.000018497016,0.00020444897,0.9989549,0.0000038408803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5343468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7452964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46565318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00978505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013412402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.936791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229767047","doi":"10.21991/c9p387","title":"McIvor v Canada and the 2010 Amendments to the Indian Act: A Half-Hearted Rememdy to Historical Injustice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Injustice; Fell; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Section (typography); Bill of rights; History; Geography; Human rights; Business; Philosophy; Cartography","score_opus":0.02528612958128768,"score_gpt":0.27514937967194986,"score_spread":0.24986325009066218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229767047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056381192,0.015331913,0.0009010247,0.2534498,0.0015425914,0.00006514291,0.00063273293,0.00007551997,0.67162013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63573337,0.0063441475,0.00086179376,0.106406555,0.00048315467,0.00006238902,0.00022601873,0.00010055264,0.24978207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99458873,0.0006768189,0.00009715155,0.00044654545,0.0022037185,0.0019871008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968541,0.0009931697,0.00021140804,0.00017585796,0.0011012695,0.00066422997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023986045,0.0003183408,0.00028634968,0.0014007197,0.029980613,0.009581135,0.0017394784,0.008160018,0.0061724107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006453637,0.0004127157,0.00042043533,0.0019035246,0.021252127,0.0023020883,0.0028062514,0.009932559,0.00040387292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029815248,0.000014267541,0.001182205,0.000045008434,0.000007904964,0.00042409776,0.015726052,0.00015065252,0.00017925646,0.83432,0.13805504,0.009865807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018132278,0.000012473737,0.007389705,0.00028907222,0.000021474967,0.00015529082,0.012481669,0.00017637463,0.000398354,0.024324026,0.9546457,0.00008791017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103769444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.103769444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1398266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7529035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229823347","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u160364","title":"Tonks, Rt. Rev. Basil, (born 28 April 1930), a Suffragan Bishop of Toronto (Credit Valley), since 1981","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Economic history; Demography; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.03622941364177408,"score_gpt":0.31629087763160685,"score_spread":0.2800614639898328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229823347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004518381,0.05342766,0.0002449055,0.039209142,0.003369955,0.00006904221,0.006522255,0.0001614727,0.8924773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014209739,0.007538107,0.00005726896,0.0018830609,0.0001605947,0.00003980331,0.00042828196,0.00005100315,0.97563213],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996588,0.000031658736,0.000012591823,0.000053255466,0.00010766511,0.0001360332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962807,0.000072533585,0.000020826197,0.000015581716,0.00019517449,0.00006777768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029039997,0.0006854329,0.00028917988,0.0008143523,0.011744091,0.0034989866,0.00069566094,0.0033672908,0.12578987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001221805,0.00045647754,0.00019402066,0.0015731443,0.0014278569,0.0014094327,0.0012564224,0.0028073431,0.028485535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012808114,0.0000040023715,0.0002646113,0.00007602576,0.0000013104506,0.00012933405,0.0011188154,0.000029525,0.000049273483,0.022413481,0.96696925,0.008931513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002285686,0.0000025358065,0.0019456422,0.00009874738,0.0000016670525,0.000027434313,0.00082220964,0.000007982516,0.000049331444,0.000655713,0.99638027,0.0000061080686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9223759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26999998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013697767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010708595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5431801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229841189","doi":"10.3138/flor.20.041","title":"<i>B. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada</i>","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Florilegium","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Section (typography); Field (mathematics); Library science; Database; Computer science; Humanities; Art; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2921218533633471,"score_gpt":0.37864893295295615,"score_spread":0.08652707958960904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229841189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028546473,0.0044777733,0.0008128186,0.03990599,0.0044383234,0.00044238375,0.13483033,0.0017998404,0.81043786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009398039,0.0042577083,0.002219231,0.002466505,0.0001864647,0.00019938083,0.027642097,0.00051034964,0.9531202],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960926,0.0002490622,0.00029337098,0.00033999255,0.0022477678,0.00077710336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9460029,0.004836536,0.0014960159,0.0024299973,0.03896243,0.0062721064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00434119,0.00062023016,0.0010895774,0.0053348336,0.0056237713,0.0067653535,0.0015542568,0.0016470248,0.2884779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021537136,0.0008352125,0.0004117678,0.010086758,0.0011132557,0.0016627508,0.0015645571,0.002684083,0.12875146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027777465,0.000015056427,0.00095311285,0.0001587867,0.0000034897528,0.00003014709,0.00016315015,0.000029951736,0.000100530764,0.003521977,0.9641921,0.030804027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068221334,0.000008272135,0.011815289,0.00019006198,0.000004952489,0.00001837085,0.0003013917,0.000056442303,0.00007815117,0.00022781678,0.98727745,0.000015015574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9370689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9622307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97891486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021085145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13694742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9650547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229879975","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u162704","title":"Carney, Rt. Rev James F., (28 June 1915–16 Sept. 1990), Archbishop of Vancouver (RC), since 1969","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Archbishop; Archaeology; Art; Geology; History; Art history; Classics","score_opus":0.032960474191073626,"score_gpt":0.3154226209091623,"score_spread":0.28246214671808867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229879975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016920695,0.08877699,0.00039145476,0.051286235,0.0077773933,0.00012986982,0.0073542665,0.00040884825,0.8421829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003359044,0.01020787,0.00012022557,0.00371381,0.00024917733,0.00003738471,0.00045165562,0.00009331433,0.9817676],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992162,0.000063784515,0.000048365215,0.00013215993,0.0003479819,0.00019149549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990451,0.00016774102,0.000037494316,0.0000430166,0.00056906353,0.00013754146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088559097,0.0010491487,0.00051144557,0.0024298886,0.014208693,0.0061663175,0.001128137,0.0050811674,0.14241214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033955376,0.00095507875,0.00045026536,0.0028619624,0.0013788674,0.0024714472,0.002122252,0.005226017,0.069031276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076797505,0.000003104146,0.00010265648,0.00003809416,9.42017e-7,0.00003751072,0.00027202282,0.000010618047,0.000018723716,0.0036869259,0.9874808,0.008340908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001446256,0.000001480735,0.00095148396,0.00010603825,0.0000013753759,0.000019750967,0.0003375292,0.0000051784414,0.000024348079,0.00032378308,0.9982229,0.000004754104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.687212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92020327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.312788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010211801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013021448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6292602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230101388","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.37888","title":"Finlay, Most Rev. Terence Edward, (19 May 1937–20 March 2017), Archbishop of Toronto and Metropolitan of the Ecclesiastical Province of Ontario, 2000–04","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Archbishop; Metropolitan area; History; Genealogy; Geography; Art; Archaeology; Classics","score_opus":0.03900140191447168,"score_gpt":0.3241815396975755,"score_spread":0.28518013778310386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230101388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025792583,0.092637174,0.0005789603,0.21109198,0.03186328,0.00016669047,0.012884608,0.00041649473,0.64778155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0066839713,0.010042986,0.00014339629,0.017901562,0.00096316944,0.00006107556,0.0008948263,0.00015076293,0.9631582],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911135,0.00008817629,0.000039789946,0.00012291902,0.00038082554,0.0002570097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986488,0.00020670805,0.000046041147,0.00005153394,0.00088141405,0.00016546203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012641564,0.0007475797,0.00044355617,0.0016131335,0.014067503,0.004468745,0.0015737158,0.0047375467,0.09847129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004017255,0.0005531773,0.00037143627,0.0018000408,0.0017898448,0.0025635834,0.0023504817,0.004104805,0.03890509],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042279244,0.0000015816041,0.000069816895,0.000023082881,7.0870306e-7,0.000023443365,0.00052800117,0.000005812016,0.000012099139,0.0024213712,0.99415684,0.0027530424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012279053,9.3253e-7,0.0006704174,0.00007348539,0.0000011672466,0.000008070025,0.00069209636,0.000003476453,0.000019756682,0.00023197451,0.9982926,0.0000047654985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79005677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9359915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79005677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013519997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015008846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42235923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230704630","doi":"10.3138/9781442624986-004","title":"1.Indigenous Peoples And The Ethos Of Legal Pluralism In Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Indigenous; Pluralism (philosophy); Legal pluralism; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Ecology; Legal realism; Comparative law; Biology","score_opus":0.017509464751021227,"score_gpt":0.2197285266060888,"score_spread":0.20221906185506758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230704630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034585014,0.06398536,0.0007440657,0.045319375,0.0010428412,0.00009065452,0.0005016481,0.00006936109,0.8536616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48633248,0.032938834,0.0012952616,0.0058768354,0.0002476869,0.000060708295,0.00016767142,0.00011356349,0.472967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816847,0.00021052232,0.0000369742,0.0001557563,0.0006855853,0.000742556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989999,0.0002451978,0.00004963764,0.00003397246,0.00040718837,0.0002641418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010611957,0.0006146216,0.00056384376,0.0018954076,0.02926974,0.011076599,0.0013783665,0.0031559616,0.013662733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00214694,0.00052889436,0.0002754873,0.005215327,0.015488604,0.0027127245,0.0025402883,0.0046446733,0.00076555775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023354625,0.00002812397,0.001374586,0.00018903497,0.000007769526,0.0002720791,0.07453993,0.0002638796,0.00013811127,0.7932978,0.09443815,0.035427187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000094553025,0.00001256304,0.006066212,0.00049295917,0.00001676161,0.00013961305,0.032081522,0.00022038995,0.00012551107,0.03707463,0.9237088,0.000051638355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9961188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12918991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12918991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20912574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93734276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231351003","doi":"10.3138/9781442693852","title":"Viscount Haldane","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Hegelianism; Sociology","score_opus":0.024114828759790312,"score_gpt":0.25234503822027415,"score_spread":0.22823020946048383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231351003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018657175,0.08208136,0.0014658592,0.2224914,0.022367088,0.000022910503,0.00015734143,0.00016637422,0.669382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021808337,0.014699026,0.0007113266,0.036245223,0.0012357251,0.000024624453,0.000047787806,0.0001312228,0.92509675],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991142,0.00018326395,0.0000147536375,0.0001748645,0.0003721002,0.00014079126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905676,0.00028125464,0.000025811973,0.00005323862,0.00041632837,0.00016652825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007938282,0.0004954044,0.00030913868,0.0009193491,0.0066492837,0.004148676,0.00092292204,0.0022108192,0.02712141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029204562,0.00022980012,0.00021869074,0.00063670287,0.0032649874,0.0027424071,0.0020086295,0.005220512,0.010816127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062988465,0.000004707052,0.00007514941,0.000031141386,0.0000011645117,0.0000583453,0.0009265502,0.000034743145,0.000055375345,0.13714357,0.8434326,0.018230364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.5279503e-7,8.3789223e-7,0.000029762274,0.0000359853,3.5827506e-7,0.000031587348,0.00022387753,0.000010918773,0.000026462987,0.00276843,0.99686927,0.0000020670127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10680214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20132156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10680214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075195115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00658744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21236098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232151085","doi":"10.1086/ahr/109.2.508","title":"Patrick Brode. <i>Courted and Abandoned: Seduction in Canadian Law</i>. Buffalo, N.Y.: University of Toronto Press, for The Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History, Toronto. 2002. Pp. xi, 252. $45.00","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Historical Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Law; History; Legal history; Political science","score_opus":0.024827916674964152,"score_gpt":0.2644130623392197,"score_spread":0.23958514566425554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232151085","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024059472,0.9251954,0.000068189045,0.045833454,0.0031275528,0.000013120031,0.00022815139,0.000016572703,0.025276937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01050297,0.9292529,0.0001475433,0.01110084,0.0017628872,0.000025589226,0.00025070785,0.000029658979,0.04692679],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982127,0.00029719694,0.00007841384,0.0001117169,0.0010626166,0.00023738145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969181,0.00067475747,0.0002949286,0.000048708232,0.0015409447,0.000522594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014972992,0.0014167117,0.00069906097,0.005458964,0.0060546547,0.004547007,0.0018522207,0.0037598924,0.030552557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053650443,0.00082327117,0.00035758765,0.013552061,0.004748651,0.0060708574,0.0015509163,0.0033047053,0.005792995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006219397,0.0000037156638,0.00031084105,0.000622771,0.0000061242536,0.00007224187,0.0016781184,0.000023362421,0.000018749046,0.0037098231,0.96623135,0.02731665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005431255,0.0000063940433,0.004747136,0.0025943276,0.000020997655,0.00023898516,0.004951288,0.000016932716,0.00002941989,0.0023539395,0.98501146,0.000023617218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9227421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96533525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07725787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025201902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038902726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18285346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232932179","doi":"10.1093/he/9780191897689.003.0062","title":"Re Amendment to the Constitution of Canada [1981] 1 SCR 753, also known as the Patriation Reference, Supreme Court of Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.037534178721235954,"score_gpt":0.23384434639923152,"score_spread":0.19631016767799556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232932179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016889747,0.013277507,0.00063528435,0.023189714,0.0022841564,0.0001585666,0.0017984376,0.000083797415,0.9568836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047380242,0.009751195,0.0016401513,0.02723793,0.0006556442,0.00019334524,0.0010399349,0.00015735265,0.9119442],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947456,0.00044073144,0.000162034,0.00045515128,0.0029092687,0.0012872772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983535,0.00033209234,0.00008573101,0.00010361786,0.0009821693,0.00014297859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020982749,0.0010734204,0.0005905263,0.0028569659,0.014819009,0.0061670453,0.0026346557,0.009987166,0.015130919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00509769,0.000859059,0.00061393366,0.004863467,0.007973004,0.0018395326,0.0015248487,0.006838685,0.0037340152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009613841,0.000015508163,0.00022649526,0.000059845068,0.000005205624,0.0001664449,0.0015787643,0.00027042167,0.00016937667,0.32310006,0.66582257,0.008575547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001083344,0.0000049412424,0.0013759278,0.00022988819,0.000009094023,0.0000463466,0.00060551305,0.00009242419,0.00015637056,0.009813339,0.9876203,0.000035049266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97960746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99184966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088176206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.088176206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13068065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63976616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232970557","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u212607","title":"Latchford, Hon. Francis Robert, (30 April 1854–13 Aug. 1938), Chief Justice in Appeal, Supreme Court of Ontario, since 1923","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Political science","score_opus":0.030163957198578513,"score_gpt":0.2960868427556575,"score_spread":0.265922885557079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232970557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054407176,0.08979111,0.00068215723,0.084146835,0.010349298,0.00013767496,0.00817716,0.0003089859,0.8009661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010357963,0.006326351,0.00010859012,0.006586707,0.00043259855,0.0000342571,0.0003704777,0.00006569937,0.97571737],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999556,0.000031491858,0.000016913058,0.000064383225,0.0001736455,0.0001576271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995689,0.00007608627,0.000022803315,0.000012102726,0.00026376473,0.000056326528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052416226,0.0005457914,0.00039023205,0.001199345,0.0128954295,0.002770274,0.00099453,0.003047254,0.08045464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015593161,0.0005026746,0.0003137235,0.0014331616,0.0013080868,0.0020827348,0.00120902,0.003020763,0.021065796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016462653,0.0000030844328,0.0002339171,0.000042454114,0.0000015094024,0.000119130236,0.00084115,0.000011468028,0.000048414902,0.006248062,0.98307645,0.009357955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002235381,0.0000018904033,0.0012744492,0.00008898324,0.0000021144876,0.000019783736,0.0004985522,0.0000058540154,0.00004559949,0.00050611363,0.9975484,0.000006087219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8068234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9673817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8068234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014632373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009249804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38862854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233503657","doi":"10.5040/9781472562654.ch-009","title":"Charting the Impact of Rights and Equality Discourse on Canadian Family Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.06121156496620136,"score_gpt":0.32590311878658684,"score_spread":0.2646915538203855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233503657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032919407,0.018988874,0.0010494887,0.05739434,0.0007416567,0.00007492561,0.00039456444,0.00006187783,0.8883749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7147816,0.013470965,0.0025957013,0.007083365,0.00021572676,0.000083528015,0.00018612831,0.0001427094,0.26144025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927488,0.0011411912,0.000102157326,0.00038194578,0.0027518526,0.0028740657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938578,0.0025223903,0.00015357375,0.00020099312,0.0023868533,0.0008784294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00467586,0.00052532967,0.000488752,0.0061419797,0.029975316,0.017441202,0.0021820925,0.0045247874,0.019568685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0107147945,0.00064718083,0.0003942855,0.009606304,0.021523677,0.0058993264,0.003437483,0.0060489494,0.00058251206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009567507,0.000009148465,0.00039826197,0.00004024231,0.000002399668,0.00007670465,0.01715499,0.00015197141,0.000058945694,0.9151448,0.042652834,0.024300052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011412262,0.000013158892,0.009354245,0.00075848115,0.000018956034,0.000065279215,0.043954562,0.00053498195,0.000323398,0.0956149,0.8492656,0.00008505314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9943163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99650145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2445079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2445079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34664816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87626374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233637514","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u45474","title":"Pitman, Rt Rev. Cyrus Clement James, (born 24 March 1944), Bishop of Newfoundland, Eastern, and Labrador, 2004–13","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; Cartography; History; Art; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04331540082316055,"score_gpt":0.32216881458912994,"score_spread":0.2788534137659694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233637514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033760362,0.098966695,0.00039693652,0.14158542,0.009035069,0.00014193637,0.006018573,0.00025906242,0.7402203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0050878203,0.008567494,0.000085756765,0.011303987,0.00039411054,0.00005963953,0.00035048288,0.000069187154,0.9740815],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991848,0.000093416944,0.000038450133,0.00013450834,0.00025730004,0.00029151523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990772,0.00020716069,0.000055016066,0.000047200345,0.00048227023,0.00013112296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011407591,0.0009629086,0.00049721776,0.001265437,0.014724628,0.004214433,0.0018988585,0.0068994877,0.091019966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003081563,0.001002298,0.0003733859,0.0020847525,0.0019099552,0.0033121333,0.0020934907,0.0068389596,0.028650008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008316765,0.000007853442,0.00013279036,0.000034143417,0.0000013623568,0.00004801915,0.00032380287,0.000016284926,0.000018649122,0.0060521434,0.98856455,0.0047920705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032619623,0.0000030125236,0.0017160155,0.00013548345,0.0000023476623,0.000024061963,0.00052526424,0.00001068659,0.000043268763,0.00066279824,0.9968645,0.000009335457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7650499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90027136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23495013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013501058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016428918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47266757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233675511","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.16928","title":"Genge, Rt Rev. Mark, (born 18 March 1927), Bishop of Central Newfoundland, 1976–90; Pastoral Associate, St John’s, Yorkmills, Ontario, 1990–92","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Genealogy; Archaeology; History","score_opus":0.0490902394714549,"score_gpt":0.3100492783384014,"score_spread":0.2609590388669465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233675511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042607817,0.07522169,0.00031757716,0.03697086,0.005022228,0.0001213756,0.010408205,0.00018525013,0.86749196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049744244,0.0049942434,0.00006819541,0.0022012603,0.00014294146,0.000047043904,0.0004676746,0.00004620823,0.987058],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994318,0.000051929106,0.00002627684,0.00009262141,0.00016044316,0.00023685269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999567,0.00007827513,0.000028639486,0.000025338939,0.00023593917,0.000064832864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006165172,0.0009806625,0.0004531337,0.0013616879,0.010688987,0.0036809198,0.0014652313,0.0044578947,0.10299537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016943242,0.00089447375,0.00029244038,0.002453266,0.0016928383,0.0023823506,0.0019292735,0.004284917,0.03013764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015142462,0.0000097263965,0.00023710368,0.000059567024,0.0000018168362,0.00008404279,0.00054170255,0.000037648184,0.000032322932,0.009506765,0.97942597,0.010048122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031404002,0.000002837667,0.0020052365,0.0001448123,0.0000020769332,0.000023192624,0.00044929067,0.0000127740395,0.0000436617,0.00056086155,0.99674326,0.000009019713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8855946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9684219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11440539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018565696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017160624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34455383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234266756","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u31567","title":"Pryce, Rt Rev. (James) Taylor, (3 May 1936–1 Aug. 2010), a Suffragan Bishop of Toronto (Area Bishop of York-Simcoe), 1985–2000","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.04879735512824983,"score_gpt":0.31972396801136066,"score_spread":0.2709266128831108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234266756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002467176,0.045569524,0.00056643714,0.12999028,0.012378481,0.0002694248,0.013016289,0.0003297887,0.79541266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004841258,0.005754967,0.00014802575,0.016008085,0.00040586895,0.00011514665,0.00074397353,0.00012501208,0.9718578],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928564,0.00008499529,0.00004232306,0.00010598919,0.0002801758,0.00020093909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988821,0.00026292852,0.00004828458,0.00004038489,0.0006319257,0.00013444055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012138145,0.0007378064,0.00042891418,0.0013180401,0.010729128,0.0043764752,0.0014586346,0.0073161335,0.12604077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004240687,0.0006972731,0.00042762575,0.0016587962,0.0010968512,0.003034977,0.0026338012,0.007580233,0.058617696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059591575,0.0000042440192,0.00007576126,0.000031668398,5.676241e-7,0.000044795925,0.00028489385,0.000008366718,0.000017241338,0.003912045,0.9917725,0.0038419464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002835334,0.000002657562,0.000911465,0.00014302619,0.0000013471966,0.000015995342,0.00051063695,0.000009601146,0.00003878347,0.0005491061,0.9978071,0.0000074711006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49958056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8056069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50041944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007276756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015242394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234567322","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100008929","title":"Profane Matrimony","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.017261520959388828,"score_gpt":0.2631867218158972,"score_spread":0.24592520085650837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234567322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028745306,0.024691377,0.0012481641,0.081458434,0.016570088,0.00003856891,0.00037712435,0.00019269637,0.8725491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03032106,0.0064291544,0.00040373622,0.010614217,0.0036935483,0.00003629832,0.00012292192,0.00013995028,0.948239],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914014,0.00024684795,0.000035907175,0.00019714172,0.00023902403,0.0001409337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993425,0.00017184782,0.000059935926,0.000086343534,0.0001838382,0.00015554455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007636037,0.0005663991,0.00029331187,0.00095763785,0.004439612,0.004371282,0.0008002994,0.002170338,0.14358246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00279515,0.00028121594,0.00023261318,0.0010129281,0.0024878227,0.0029187293,0.0028892774,0.0040016784,0.05526475],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033307602,0.000019410709,0.0003887662,0.000115359275,0.0000033000454,0.00029779525,0.0018371558,0.00008245244,0.00025702128,0.21969955,0.7319716,0.045294326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011344572,0.0000030518202,0.00011555115,0.000051008286,5.630927e-7,0.000053882166,0.00018032739,0.000020776615,0.00004499358,0.002658939,0.99686795,0.0000019211097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059111416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007880479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9940889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032094428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027607726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48033118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234707460","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.29380","title":"Marsh, Rt Rev. Edward Frank, (born 25 Oct. 1935), Bishop of Central Newfoundland, 1990–2000; Diocesan Administrator, Diocese of Central Newfoundland, 2005","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marsh; Genealogy; History; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.028819901419771622,"score_gpt":0.3073402237148953,"score_spread":0.27852032229512363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234707460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003529767,0.103335775,0.00043977806,0.09286104,0.005927152,0.000104422375,0.009503963,0.00026430466,0.7840338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006335369,0.008802186,0.00010784108,0.009277724,0.0002665798,0.000055028486,0.00054073695,0.000058538484,0.9745559],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992768,0.000056190605,0.00003359476,0.000102932005,0.00023048805,0.0003000071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992343,0.00014852069,0.000044050346,0.000031959193,0.00043908454,0.00010211251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006936762,0.0009332013,0.00044233172,0.0014152984,0.01214089,0.0039065746,0.0015915199,0.005862856,0.09404606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002304817,0.0009007028,0.00035020383,0.0023524393,0.0017885844,0.003140451,0.0017834745,0.005197772,0.030545864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009442709,0.0000064954575,0.00018006453,0.00003880285,0.0000013075534,0.0000554047,0.00031154402,0.000022773589,0.000022933104,0.0063443677,0.9858861,0.0071206754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034161815,0.0000026924306,0.002394168,0.0001844251,0.0000028692937,0.000027947139,0.00058296043,0.000015000611,0.000041756677,0.0006775183,0.99605715,0.000010086831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9010719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.971058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9010719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016618999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020917853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31461543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234753337","doi":"10.24124/2012/bpgub806","title":"Human Rights and the Duty to Accommodate in Employment: Stakeholders' Knowledge and Attitudes.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Likert scale; Duty; Psychology; Scale (ratio); Educational attainment; Social psychology; Political science; Developmental psychology; Geography; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.08172978184557138,"score_gpt":0.37784873544702535,"score_spread":0.29611895360145396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234753337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.989585,0.0004622084,0.00018098141,0.0011350662,0.000009387405,0.000016913113,0.00008082033,0.000001587697,0.008527985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985689,0.00034280866,0.00008965276,0.00013841334,0.0000024920223,0.0000052975624,0.00003103974,4.6054183e-7,0.00082094246],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983632,0.00021396742,0.00006543985,0.000079061414,0.00093549915,0.00034291527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649256,0.001061003,0.0008652942,0.0000555048,0.00086499465,0.00066056394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019280951,0.00010015393,0.00015146336,0.00076873414,0.0027759916,0.0017340266,0.00044778088,0.0005725812,0.0029963169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059424946,0.00012270827,0.00016814118,0.0009300417,0.0016301599,0.0012958433,0.0012055994,0.00061748363,0.00018104691],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004278022,0.0001577662,0.7914788,0.00025701371,0.000022601174,0.00063952955,0.12608665,0.00015187559,0.0014826773,0.0016759591,0.0012238097,0.07678043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030536037,0.00009951792,0.6725898,0.00029179055,0.000016244074,0.00032929942,0.3141096,0.00030063593,0.00040768544,0.0006180838,0.011205141,0.000029167953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49500746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6805188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49500746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043731215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012667276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9842524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234917865","doi":"10.21991/cf29370","title":"Wahkohtowin in Action","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Indigenous; Law; Commission; Action (physics); Political science; Work (physics); Sociology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.03714303502622718,"score_gpt":0.318395759727178,"score_spread":0.2812527247009508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234917865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058081318,0.0010898935,0.006211628,0.028864726,0.0010229656,0.00034195115,0.00017747335,0.00021810448,0.9039919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4763479,0.0005853369,0.008787149,0.0058179097,0.000033253495,0.00026450868,0.00010789535,0.00007829696,0.50797784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841416,0.00031263658,0.000041839285,0.00031258052,0.00036866724,0.00055000716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992537,0.00011875633,0.00003965979,0.00009204211,0.00016670949,0.00032911386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019909826,0.00034857666,0.00020436052,0.00062118826,0.010778424,0.0046470813,0.0009370807,0.0020045731,0.023648039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021727425,0.00021423248,0.00021642103,0.0005485088,0.0061465516,0.0027003607,0.0055429917,0.0024555998,0.001930418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006172793,0.0001102657,0.0036465444,0.00016069211,0.000009930985,0.000834649,0.06312163,0.00022750827,0.0019077975,0.7486032,0.08120033,0.10011565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009319668,0.000017891945,0.0027127266,0.00016756367,0.000010058279,0.0001245319,0.03126185,0.00024946232,0.0007347333,0.026091391,0.93859285,0.000027528284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30239046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.555779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30239046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00843366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025420118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60126066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234956907","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.43470","title":"Elliott, Rt Rev. (Matthew) George (Holden), (born 17 Feb. 1949), a Suffragan Bishop of Toronto (Area Bishop of York-Simcoe), 2001–13","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Art; Art history","score_opus":0.05252377553674156,"score_gpt":0.3231119310558,"score_spread":0.27058815551905846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234956907","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001878948,0.04771931,0.00025555945,0.1073339,0.0047781756,0.00011790735,0.005947647,0.00019839674,0.8317701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006001185,0.008634305,0.00010389796,0.022736816,0.00047926154,0.000113957336,0.0006314529,0.00009556662,0.9612036],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923956,0.00010652826,0.00004838194,0.00012309036,0.00028055726,0.00020198726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915564,0.00025159595,0.00004719523,0.00004011937,0.00040348878,0.00010189436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010099746,0.0009000654,0.00046778886,0.0012777306,0.009879174,0.004591812,0.0017017566,0.010385584,0.13112663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031770347,0.00081999885,0.00042104293,0.0020627582,0.0012348978,0.0031459853,0.0019584917,0.0068640443,0.071356766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006877359,0.0000067742744,0.00008394989,0.000038199258,7.9012983e-7,0.00004080107,0.00022541573,0.00001231008,0.000024000905,0.010181088,0.9850034,0.0043762852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004926712,0.0000033967688,0.0010814874,0.00014604279,0.0000015677639,0.00001864037,0.00030222986,0.000011955315,0.00004524082,0.0013987154,0.99697745,0.000008355138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33759874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59138846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66240126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005730535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00860405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6712674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235236168","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u33891","title":"Morgan, Most Rev. Thomas Oliver, (born 20 Jan. 1941), Archbishop of Saskatoon and Metropolitan of the Ecclesiastical Province of Rupert’s Land, 2000–03; Interim Rector and Dean, St John’s Cathedral, Saskatoon, 2006–07 and 2011–12","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Archbishop; Metropolitan area; Interim; Art history; Art; History; Archaeology; Classics","score_opus":0.030488918802679517,"score_gpt":0.2942868236882268,"score_spread":0.2637979048855473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235236168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032472326,0.18112104,0.0009668049,0.1717738,0.016281614,0.00014945897,0.009825677,0.0003816894,0.6162527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018459495,0.049364205,0.0005410007,0.029484754,0.0012119093,0.00016867138,0.0011372351,0.00026804113,0.89936465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987312,0.00022892685,0.00009174787,0.00014329757,0.0005176693,0.0002871627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987337,0.00023871704,0.000095273645,0.000052612893,0.000730557,0.00014919224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011845817,0.0011641579,0.00047957143,0.0021003387,0.008160242,0.005149488,0.0016140676,0.0044415873,0.05377806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035938928,0.00083853735,0.00035916813,0.004942038,0.0027652753,0.004512146,0.0021091427,0.0056743696,0.025843635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064510928,0.0000026176867,0.00009644251,0.000050022267,0.0000012422983,0.000027215992,0.0007601767,0.000015118956,0.000018858926,0.007214296,0.9872471,0.0045604515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032558182,0.000001585038,0.0010332101,0.00017878838,0.0000025183283,0.000019848161,0.0017617497,0.000006229713,0.000042466487,0.001294785,0.99564373,0.000011946053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7264131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8790277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7264131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014829154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026119644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55039626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235424127","doi":"10.5040/9781509947201.ch-002","title":"The Making of the Canadian Constitution","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05389451511250016,"score_gpt":0.30334208850455224,"score_spread":0.2494475733920521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235424127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034526729,0.0061943107,0.00083119905,0.027379034,0.0008067633,0.000035200235,0.00014979865,0.00003096117,0.96112007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32579115,0.008697695,0.0027976274,0.0126173645,0.00048407677,0.00010155663,0.00015277899,0.00018765719,0.6491702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954685,0.00080010673,0.0000557038,0.00035315362,0.0017307639,0.0015917448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981566,0.0003932829,0.00004391396,0.000111179004,0.0009806149,0.00031442806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028162664,0.0006882856,0.0005396658,0.0029552083,0.02751169,0.013099801,0.0018130564,0.0044457894,0.015554158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063693225,0.0006239536,0.00045504817,0.0039647776,0.020528441,0.0038807273,0.0024262583,0.0069832015,0.0012809371],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039500515,0.000003247235,0.00006863147,0.000010677678,0.0000015079889,0.000026049764,0.002234339,0.00008812992,0.000021457172,0.9540303,0.038221627,0.0052899923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073704223,0.0000035525047,0.0009940122,0.00017161842,0.0000095739415,0.0000437876,0.0041756527,0.0002538316,0.000115179064,0.12451805,0.8696736,0.000033857737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99144906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99531144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15619357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15619357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22134848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97869587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235596555","doi":"10.1080/14490854.2015.11668592","title":"Newfoundland","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History Australia","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lakehead University","keywords":"Thunder; Tourism; Recreation; Media studies; Art; Geography; Art history; Sociology; Political science; Archaeology; Law; Meteorology","score_opus":0.21723605521895084,"score_gpt":0.3636417589542197,"score_spread":0.14640570373526884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235596555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00064579386,0.00094796816,0.0002863712,0.0007365859,0.00063240196,0.000041508974,0.012890263,0.00070508546,0.9831141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00069889706,0.00049190293,0.00024436103,0.00015281125,0.00002614372,0.000012347829,0.0028638586,0.00031009733,0.9951997],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961996,0.000018829916,0.000019226918,0.00008082424,0.00017761649,0.00008345448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988016,0.00010898384,0.00005284498,0.00014661379,0.00054710306,0.00034281827],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041019087,0.00089677225,0.00061611517,0.0022424369,0.0018851614,0.0040633664,0.00090418995,0.00086985336,0.8904063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012904144,0.00053438306,0.00040669442,0.0030644624,0.00038644674,0.0024068293,0.0020991806,0.0011168486,0.7102062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003369682,0.000025068663,0.000377221,0.00010747502,0.0000031152563,0.0000800077,0.00004783884,0.000041753003,0.00031835202,0.0018644318,0.9118983,0.08520278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025690272,0.0000034321104,0.0010229475,0.00006024918,0.0000011253129,0.000033204033,0.000055127908,0.000018298244,0.000078654186,0.000119088654,0.9986004,0.0000048473407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11397298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3206055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8904063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022315937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027444684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22661912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235603964","doi":"10.1093/9780198727255.003.0039","title":"Canada—Saskatchewan","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Charter; Legislation; Law; Scope (computer science); Politics; Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Public administration","score_opus":0.055230095428009336,"score_gpt":0.29251150889297994,"score_spread":0.23728141346497061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235603964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034115307,0.012038068,0.00043821134,0.0054665417,0.0005937424,0.000059936297,0.0026550728,0.00010212265,0.9752348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010540928,0.0057233702,0.00055184966,0.0009180581,0.0000219454,0.000029815727,0.0008126473,0.00006336464,0.981338],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99972135,0.000019304294,0.00000934906,0.000057924015,0.00011128184,0.00008080592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967,0.000032912085,0.000008750058,0.000019104704,0.00020986146,0.000059388374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022803133,0.0006332075,0.0002763454,0.0018430611,0.0074391565,0.004073156,0.0010456882,0.0010337076,0.12601386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044564216,0.00040868644,0.00025164368,0.0052139214,0.001551607,0.0013676455,0.001484439,0.0016507682,0.018390648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027050637,0.00002493424,0.0010542509,0.0003500204,0.000009910488,0.00050483464,0.0025346302,0.00045527486,0.00080764573,0.16838904,0.68429613,0.14154622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019702106,0.0000017551215,0.0009022598,0.00010766398,0.000002146396,0.000044107575,0.0006037119,0.000052695443,0.000105112296,0.0017318233,0.99643886,0.000007866194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97608066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12601386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051597122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0599712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42155838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235941287","doi":"10.4324/9781315229829-33","title":"Assisting Suicide: An Analysis of the Legal (i.e., Moral) Arguments in Judgments of the Supreme Court of Canada in the Sue Rodriguez Case","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.06007600749323869,"score_gpt":0.30220202347659575,"score_spread":0.24212601598335706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235941287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10024404,0.015354291,0.0012444011,0.035595004,0.00066585094,0.00015713692,0.00023798808,0.00004287641,0.8464584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79512787,0.012047424,0.002093727,0.011167348,0.00029770052,0.000097778226,0.00023505601,0.00006344143,0.17886959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973181,0.00056366273,0.000036475274,0.00009364915,0.0010653673,0.00092272594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979504,0.00094255654,0.00008241247,0.00002105533,0.00076274236,0.00024085201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017542562,0.00047822116,0.0004903203,0.0037612377,0.019771118,0.009850963,0.0020882315,0.004200508,0.0053708074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049441485,0.00030802045,0.0005728883,0.0041501457,0.010082217,0.0017708213,0.0016048753,0.004663872,0.00049142854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021689933,0.000058159363,0.0017615084,0.0001466809,0.000017044184,0.0024751085,0.060631637,0.00083228917,0.00034938473,0.8459517,0.07216244,0.015592317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025905652,0.00004144697,0.027118357,0.0015336681,0.00007855695,0.0007170538,0.19603288,0.003296993,0.0007938013,0.113857396,0.6563386,0.0001653716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9385287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9817815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09497439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09497439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.072051704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68909067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236603093","doi":"10.1093/icon/mor073","title":"10 x 10","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Harassment; Law; Pornography; Verdict; Political science; Sociology; Human rights; Criminology","score_opus":0.03962335443621007,"score_gpt":0.35380493360002174,"score_spread":0.3141815791638117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236603093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044392562,0.0013952496,0.00066327566,0.0025598113,0.0037572428,0.00013133929,0.000840984,0.0005923333,0.9896158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002007312,0.0012333834,0.00048394696,0.0012568458,0.00061476417,0.00006231998,0.0009468772,0.00023062211,0.9931639],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913967,0.00013620847,0.00004015984,0.00022971496,0.00031250232,0.00014174184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990343,0.000112665155,0.00004911159,0.00016251762,0.0003667414,0.00027474263],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062764133,0.0012261787,0.00071316166,0.0015317643,0.0018527525,0.00914344,0.0014912935,0.0032732312,0.86602527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020718775,0.0004555286,0.00088599813,0.0013709886,0.001008271,0.0044932836,0.004386797,0.0025004179,0.7831927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042549076,0.00006464786,0.00043270865,0.00018956898,0.00000786294,0.000097454526,0.00016110252,0.00007832663,0.00036541425,0.018187983,0.86829937,0.11207311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004771935,0.000014841324,0.0002492555,0.00011311005,0.0000015643461,0.00009544199,0.00012003458,0.000026073629,0.000046224264,0.0007203113,0.99860424,0.000004111308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004330749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047910227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13397473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018642357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020549335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236679568","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.7032","title":"Bedford-Jones, Rt Rev. Michael Hugh Harold, (born 29 Sept. 1942), a Suffragan Bishop of Toronto, 1994–2008 (Area Bishop of York Scarborough, 1994–2006, of Trent-Durham, 2006–08)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art history; Art; History","score_opus":0.03566128111900596,"score_gpt":0.3009635865416461,"score_spread":0.26530230542264016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236679568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028710018,0.08095773,0.00035085087,0.08946906,0.00903649,0.0001292493,0.0052493815,0.00021690539,0.81171936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0056843474,0.009410967,0.00009073149,0.012190735,0.00049751403,0.000072173454,0.00040756655,0.000090047564,0.9715559],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994363,0.00007402302,0.000030155514,0.00009853395,0.00021019252,0.00015077727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994197,0.00015713122,0.000031479518,0.00002702222,0.00025856306,0.00010624367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007801318,0.00079380063,0.00040524316,0.00097157754,0.008733149,0.0037069358,0.0013147572,0.006283881,0.12091033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027238827,0.00067417766,0.000326288,0.0014688883,0.0011697247,0.0032373478,0.0020745331,0.0053560133,0.045741398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007452662,0.0000071509403,0.000106083666,0.000035675133,8.459954e-7,0.000047022073,0.00038563664,0.000011221324,0.000021891914,0.008290993,0.98542726,0.0056587565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000301008,0.0000029428202,0.00089109037,0.00012104858,0.0000011199252,0.000022986138,0.000525591,0.000007651666,0.000028967168,0.0009165993,0.9974732,0.0000058311034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33506504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63356787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33506504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052914843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0082066115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6662295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237609388","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u27277","title":"Mercer, Rev. Mgr Robert William Stanley, (born 10 Jan. 1935), Diocesan Bishop, Anglican Catholic Church of Canada, 1989–2005 (Assistant Bishop, 1988–89)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Art history; Theology; Genealogy; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026232119137664257,"score_gpt":0.2966238239852705,"score_spread":0.2703917048476062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237609388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023043558,0.18051706,0.00039409485,0.16913192,0.011687581,0.00008708565,0.0047409646,0.00031480778,0.6308222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007497448,0.024728596,0.00017609463,0.022541994,0.0012761254,0.00008684458,0.00050126534,0.00012490124,0.9430668],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999474,0.00007414521,0.000026929067,0.00009164106,0.00021666061,0.00011676488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994885,0.00013913798,0.000038702306,0.000025947595,0.00022840101,0.00007928477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008709174,0.00074736855,0.00042769054,0.0011182054,0.006206937,0.0030650613,0.0012481516,0.004546265,0.105298646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028492701,0.0005817378,0.00029151427,0.0014576473,0.0009357205,0.0030951058,0.0018719506,0.00398909,0.046997007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051088055,0.0000042609367,0.00007358326,0.000030073888,7.134715e-7,0.000022109063,0.00019596188,0.000009219779,0.000015405085,0.006487596,0.98716146,0.005994578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025007892,0.0000018683465,0.0006940664,0.00013174803,0.0000012358606,0.000015628175,0.0002586512,0.0000072606545,0.000026983578,0.0010433088,0.9978125,0.000004361113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18989642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40165526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8101036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003833949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049463427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3775822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237992252","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14310","title":"Chippewas of Mnjikaning First Nation v. Ontario, <i>[2010] O.J. No. 212 (Can.)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Political science; Volume (thermodynamics); Humanities; Library science; Media studies; Law and economics; Art; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Physics","score_opus":0.0355278059403537,"score_gpt":0.25742701748253416,"score_spread":0.22189921154218045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237992252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03604845,0.0058643287,0.00073063077,0.07850953,0.0011488002,0.00020231209,0.0026644943,0.00010676034,0.8747247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16157706,0.0035025198,0.00057981396,0.053241674,0.00018514515,0.00013462879,0.0006615586,0.000056541514,0.78006107],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880755,0.00006854294,0.000027233731,0.00009729076,0.0005058467,0.0004935883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988387,0.0002630101,0.000050541687,0.00003771765,0.00058216136,0.000227988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009741775,0.0004136527,0.0002699047,0.0006901329,0.018378131,0.004925172,0.0012790577,0.0070055667,0.017352419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034185313,0.00055825885,0.0003979025,0.0008922406,0.002109986,0.0014702309,0.0009831631,0.003522717,0.001707261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007007269,0.000037998147,0.008965408,0.00014761569,0.000020267069,0.00085191324,0.005334707,0.00014268458,0.0008537342,0.11146428,0.86096257,0.011148671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025241494,0.000026962454,0.030174091,0.0002253168,0.000059237773,0.00015224368,0.0052832,0.0002732943,0.0010239979,0.0041824593,0.9585112,0.00006279819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96049106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9935462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03950894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027333621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049624745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19832021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238071745","doi":"10.22215/etd/2003-05644","title":"Have we tried improving women's lives? Women in conflict with the law in Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender studies; Women's Lives; Political science; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.01572009203063706,"score_gpt":0.267266994467771,"score_spread":0.25154690243713396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238071745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.709401,0.008422742,0.00019034733,0.21612574,0.0009708269,0.00011711468,0.00038238865,0.000022659762,0.06436715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9506154,0.0055547766,0.00028957293,0.019029811,0.00008488864,0.000059494334,0.000113912494,0.00004129739,0.024210729],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916176,0.0013988189,0.00013829606,0.00032695223,0.0013290324,0.0051892637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836563,0.002022175,0.00071149645,0.00011755387,0.0033689807,0.010123375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039225253,0.0003724477,0.0009793199,0.0015894981,0.067554034,0.012263071,0.0035049173,0.004871949,0.009233117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015922455,0.00051264063,0.00046442615,0.00503912,0.011634578,0.0034517352,0.0051088044,0.009444646,0.00038063727],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020078318,0.000303465,0.07300803,0.0002749324,0.00008264806,0.0025767554,0.72296095,0.00043472074,0.00046151583,0.038943205,0.091432355,0.06932056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020926553,0.000038184786,0.02470017,0.00034285765,0.000034199355,0.00019109354,0.8869185,0.00010638219,0.0001337041,0.0012427451,0.08619809,0.00007315621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99559623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99852824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13563819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13563819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32124314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9841286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238408455","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19411","title":"Merpaw v. Hyde (c.o.b. City Limits Convenience) <i>[2015] O.J. No. 800; 2015 ONSC 1053 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, February 20, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Humanities; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.05733022544795584,"score_gpt":0.3092049537484531,"score_spread":0.25187472830049723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238408455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009743629,0.0034015144,0.00094060716,0.024351357,0.000496564,0.00012425662,0.0014378125,0.00015075871,0.9593535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.083478965,0.0022610615,0.0008119779,0.032306597,0.00015317496,0.00012249006,0.0005033199,0.000086219676,0.8802762],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898773,0.00009717922,0.00003657427,0.000117104195,0.00044742573,0.00031402882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989052,0.00033582986,0.00007347581,0.00005334392,0.0004530142,0.00017923981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009098107,0.00035306293,0.00024648933,0.0006941421,0.0075561106,0.0042916927,0.0010685399,0.0047601964,0.05338685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035639852,0.00072391005,0.00039152917,0.0008030227,0.0014157069,0.0018918476,0.001425678,0.0032933096,0.007871227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038282586,0.000023190794,0.0021172834,0.00009684492,0.000008104976,0.00022907031,0.0011136916,0.00006841428,0.0003291024,0.14785978,0.8371246,0.010991585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020123822,0.000019001644,0.0071941274,0.00016900033,0.00002174568,0.00011820616,0.00071895047,0.0001952002,0.0005648925,0.003490261,0.9874622,0.00002618733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5027984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8127381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49720162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064004543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01076112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238433646","doi":"10.29173/alr277","title":"Ghost Dancing with Colonialism: Decolonization and Indigenous Rights at the Supreme Court of Canada, Grace Li Xiu Woo (Vancouver: UBS Press 2011)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Supreme court; Colonialism; Economic Justice; Law; Decolonization; Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.014824671932979436,"score_gpt":0.2651521155101807,"score_spread":0.25032744357720127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238433646","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00566529,0.80100346,0.00011663535,0.1363813,0.0036203074,0.000035450263,0.00019240045,0.000018123257,0.05296705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18267375,0.6200851,0.00038982727,0.08920675,0.0030302594,0.00008181517,0.00020864657,0.0000628323,0.104261026],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969505,0.0005049526,0.00009987603,0.0001594817,0.0014528648,0.00083233044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99700516,0.0009499123,0.00018610276,0.00007441004,0.0013415177,0.0004429665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002386931,0.0005147208,0.0006051303,0.0019088018,0.013614323,0.008341732,0.0019728972,0.0057442384,0.0033525561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054425853,0.00044386895,0.00030541938,0.0042967657,0.010516619,0.002260188,0.0016053108,0.0052236654,0.00036571533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002300974,0.000029809007,0.0013735158,0.0009779177,0.00004805292,0.00041120857,0.0112651605,0.00028408537,0.00016532133,0.09071916,0.84655267,0.04815019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016020274,0.000012204517,0.010733648,0.0026410653,0.00008008984,0.0001376447,0.012508461,0.00009259528,0.00019859134,0.009050208,0.96445805,0.00007142569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9744538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050932664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050932664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14463556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36954403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238483413","doi":"10.1093/9780198727255.003.0035","title":"Canada—Alberta","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Legislation; Law; Scope (computer science); Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Politics; Civil rights; Public administration; Engineering","score_opus":0.0597085904050945,"score_gpt":0.29655027541090817,"score_spread":0.23684168500581368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238483413","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00090496993,0.008931809,0.00028369777,0.002208363,0.0007743482,0.00002437342,0.0012129791,0.000105682346,0.9855538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005503064,0.0031674996,0.00032163883,0.00041027705,0.000055943052,0.000008249728,0.00048685537,0.0000538134,0.98999256],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968874,0.000011865794,0.0000050942626,0.000057767,0.00016604205,0.0000705236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997243,0.000016595843,0.000006065464,0.0000128908805,0.00016631928,0.00007374252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019054337,0.0005461937,0.00028523986,0.0017778802,0.0059062294,0.0041342564,0.00096026,0.0010382473,0.15633282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033190328,0.00025222905,0.00018199261,0.0034042362,0.0014297938,0.0011169119,0.00094200094,0.0013341887,0.024840191],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012950426,0.000011477349,0.0002567264,0.000114624025,0.0000020221798,0.00012233962,0.0006085941,0.00014030226,0.00022482117,0.106468484,0.8038992,0.08813842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.2819705e-7,8.9817485e-7,0.00027828847,0.000039351304,5.496374e-7,0.000019287778,0.00010917051,0.000016553624,0.00003707117,0.0008073401,0.99868876,0.000002020566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.935459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9808745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15633282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034602825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03311783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5229854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238500261","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u244865","title":"Doull, Hon. John, (1 Nov. 1878–27 Oct. 1969), Judge, Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, 1933–61; permission to retain title Honourable granted upon retirement from Supreme Court","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Nova scotia; Law; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05120006649073198,"score_gpt":0.3231740844935051,"score_spread":0.2719740180027731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238500261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013057827,0.019754807,0.00043736986,0.052191474,0.010032802,0.00027916054,0.010501889,0.00021145801,0.89353323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018430728,0.0021948074,0.00011301192,0.009067641,0.0003267932,0.000071876006,0.00059278,0.000054802433,0.96914756],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912447,0.00004680542,0.000042458363,0.00009915778,0.00033020868,0.00035700804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991253,0.00017608087,0.000052382045,0.00004022193,0.0004516319,0.0001543094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068379653,0.00059169,0.00042367043,0.0010809308,0.011107317,0.0027938331,0.001269046,0.005108664,0.062390674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029142308,0.00079879083,0.0003802793,0.0011866135,0.0012954429,0.0011504074,0.001440654,0.0066320123,0.026920324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003255949,0.000009517809,0.00081038865,0.000050396193,0.0000030108683,0.00022548428,0.0007378807,0.00003433914,0.00021056186,0.0068886154,0.98580396,0.00519333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015023432,0.000009830851,0.009823425,0.00018690055,0.0000073236097,0.00006545547,0.000883948,0.000039840663,0.00024506773,0.0008249566,0.98787326,0.000025032858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80619574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95874757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19380426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012298208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013258034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3898912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238683358","doi":"10.7202/042920ar","title":"Les donations","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022770388662599016,"score_gpt":0.29154842890246074,"score_spread":0.26877804023986174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238683358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008671414,0.0026794986,0.0025855012,0.009184572,0.0023799373,0.00014417934,0.0011965233,0.00022315561,0.97293514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052927755,0.002882154,0.0012108525,0.004166552,0.0005631586,0.00014974907,0.001075748,0.0001432048,0.9368808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99402124,0.0013057489,0.00026038496,0.00081680133,0.0024811812,0.0011147014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708885,0.0004196069,0.00022919952,0.0004279888,0.0013489574,0.00048546813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033027583,0.00084826583,0.0006742557,0.0022114674,0.007182157,0.008035635,0.001309219,0.0026143729,0.14719659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007768585,0.00039362267,0.0006516373,0.0029360363,0.0031334667,0.004276732,0.0056970166,0.0037219704,0.046102725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011618941,0.00007554174,0.0027894133,0.00026322118,0.000021399228,0.00054454885,0.0056789657,0.0001975186,0.00060097896,0.59502095,0.2844228,0.110268496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006831225,0.000017834369,0.0011784798,0.00011884222,0.000004861846,0.00017306108,0.0007544313,0.00003974188,0.00013469452,0.0063418737,0.9912176,0.000011707961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033828285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04014552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14719659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066619506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010733891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49242163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238978280","doi":"10.7588/worllitetoda.91.3-4.0016","title":"Labrador","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Literature Today","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.02143503517190618,"score_gpt":0.3209963752939677,"score_spread":0.2995613401220615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238978280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015915307,0.0032778683,0.001315785,0.0018324207,0.0010413979,0.00005166404,0.0019984392,0.0011462288,0.98774475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038137736,0.0010100851,0.00073839974,0.00026855827,0.00010648914,0.000021498507,0.00071320555,0.00028540316,0.9930426],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991227,0.00011697736,0.000041609364,0.0002981651,0.00029085344,0.00012973194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907815,0.00015313373,0.00008088172,0.0002033471,0.00027145894,0.00021310836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006488916,0.0014645464,0.00072587753,0.0032151467,0.0020176559,0.0057782247,0.0015540776,0.0017316715,0.79130155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020341007,0.0004398109,0.0005070413,0.0027348513,0.0007214339,0.002113001,0.0026107745,0.0012274085,0.71521884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019675387,0.00012954559,0.00078821194,0.00040386306,0.000019717252,0.0003907119,0.00023879857,0.00023881144,0.0017424163,0.034795776,0.38006482,0.58099055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010334123,0.00001572289,0.00036884102,0.00009384363,0.0000059775666,0.00015126764,0.00011983477,0.000074146075,0.0004489863,0.0016241942,0.9970817,0.0000051089896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027190372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043980745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79130155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010677604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014505936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239195434","doi":"10.24124/2005/bpgub333","title":"Clash of concepts: An exploration into the conflicts between Aboriginal self-government and liberalism.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Heritage; University of Northern British Columbia; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Northern British Columbia","keywords":"Liberalism; Government (linguistics); Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Media studies; Art; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03671595647278105,"score_gpt":0.3817136461993369,"score_spread":0.34499768972655587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239195434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54433435,0.014261405,0.010788375,0.035385847,0.00032340843,0.00012659168,0.00006000882,0.000038534785,0.39468148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99200624,0.0013622554,0.0014084043,0.0005124614,0.000027139107,0.000039304912,0.00001551828,0.000024079323,0.0046046944],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.993046,0.005527238,0.00009485519,0.00029383073,0.00055149355,0.00048655443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906185,0.00687977,0.0007943981,0.00046518145,0.00068598334,0.00055620476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008975049,0.00045989628,0.0004679231,0.0034721603,0.015057507,0.010305402,0.0018703912,0.002359518,0.0050507956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013470816,0.00044467108,0.00035380607,0.004377577,0.056585796,0.0124898935,0.008210357,0.0049948636,0.00023667022],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014568093,0.000011065522,0.00075034227,0.000051872135,0.0000034659724,0.00022342005,0.77714634,0.000024233761,0.00009187207,0.21403679,0.0005518765,0.007094213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000834995,0.000015259595,0.0026843753,0.0004113266,0.000009810631,0.0003026584,0.84995055,0.00023180654,0.0001220128,0.104356475,0.041897286,0.000010097507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036059976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060576495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011993985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012241143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0870229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239596921","doi":"10.24124/2000/bpgub154","title":"The Sto:lo world view and the individualism of Canadian law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Individualism; Political science; Common law; Sociology","score_opus":0.026786852201098194,"score_gpt":0.31119254377734007,"score_spread":0.28440569157624185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239596921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11647337,0.003854927,0.002107389,0.054871302,0.00032056466,0.00005299943,0.000115016635,0.000041843556,0.82216257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961552,0.0018666311,0.0009491493,0.0054392563,0.00005707012,0.000019591771,0.00003916619,0.000026999438,0.03005013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943705,0.0010554428,0.000095491414,0.0005690704,0.0019704183,0.0019389983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970419,0.00088170904,0.0002324944,0.00013885775,0.0009163598,0.0007886869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041897413,0.00037637158,0.00028953576,0.0035064246,0.03871411,0.013717016,0.0014170388,0.0020187593,0.007982144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003600517,0.00032478897,0.0003396672,0.003153041,0.062679395,0.0047093625,0.0054579573,0.004459133,0.0002662125],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010901317,0.000016197127,0.0033140143,0.000068640504,0.000007400269,0.000216451,0.20454802,0.00016089783,0.00019570517,0.7621013,0.011246564,0.018113911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013040373,0.000024872674,0.016502164,0.0005242319,0.000031577954,0.0002608376,0.34048235,0.0005400476,0.00024665432,0.1098249,0.5314279,0.00012139864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9737942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98343915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12021968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12021968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10234865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8722589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239997036","doi":"10.3138/9781442663077","title":"Free to Believe","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.028032474632750933,"score_gpt":0.24604847176744737,"score_spread":0.21801599713469644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239997036","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044009186,0.0027728665,0.0008580131,0.009201402,0.000803126,0.000025548787,0.00009390036,0.000040288523,0.9857648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025038509,0.0022002882,0.0006936471,0.010247535,0.00047517905,0.000051097722,0.00013008116,0.00008957246,0.96107405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985207,0.00031666344,0.000037052705,0.00021751656,0.0005478398,0.0003603431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989662,0.00033093564,0.000037731643,0.00020795355,0.00025872362,0.00019835726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013325956,0.0005724126,0.0003718024,0.00069535105,0.005708037,0.006114815,0.00079116574,0.0038984704,0.057652187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035956367,0.00035353564,0.00041494184,0.0005770387,0.008750511,0.006527418,0.0036753959,0.0055852723,0.015581447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000422507,0.000008185492,0.000046047717,0.00002264501,0.0000012375936,0.000030213494,0.0017585426,0.000029689472,0.00005591928,0.7560348,0.22274032,0.019268215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002295428,0.0000039332867,0.00009567144,0.00006612869,0.000001145923,0.00004304369,0.00038537083,0.000020920263,0.000044116372,0.04649045,0.95284206,0.0000048753845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03695866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09091785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057652187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051093646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007847297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19286579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240323807","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0002","title":"Indigenous Constitutionalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Indigenous; Constitution; Political science; State (computer science); Indigenous rights; Order (exchange); Geography; Ethnology; Sociology; Law; Ecology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.051848290614391654,"score_gpt":0.26837406279559683,"score_spread":0.21652577218120517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240323807","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055746655,0.007958927,0.00052776973,0.0046428554,0.00024113382,0.000014353865,0.0000913144,0.000023447967,0.9809256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5098601,0.013876038,0.0010104615,0.003240577,0.00036659124,0.000035964727,0.00022678345,0.00007749402,0.47130612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986197,0.00016869111,0.000016753922,0.000154074,0.0006077834,0.00043291267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993869,0.00016499822,0.000024111325,0.000048641698,0.00027199925,0.000103398204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088223553,0.00028229717,0.00024898408,0.001555367,0.011809982,0.005865853,0.0010170441,0.0009889317,0.014315861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012942454,0.00012566337,0.00018915243,0.0020427103,0.013897843,0.0017655662,0.0016351404,0.0024459392,0.0007019058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019846868,0.000004309592,0.00016373178,0.00003578631,0.0000015079233,0.0000618677,0.008035669,0.00009547558,0.00006937205,0.96176076,0.020110369,0.0096590705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014476111,0.0000024124336,0.0010605075,0.00018633541,0.0000036237577,0.00005638195,0.0038969107,0.00009029155,0.000103651655,0.029980341,0.96461064,0.0000074574973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87867755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9192032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87867755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058398142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050256405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42371017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240655957","doi":"10.1108/rr.2002.16.6.49.325","title":"The Canadian Encyclopedia","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Reviews","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Encyclopedia; Foundation (evidence); Library science; Marsh; Geography; Archaeology; Biology; Wetland; Computer science; Ecology","score_opus":0.14629021198624517,"score_gpt":0.3502135251671849,"score_spread":0.20392331318093973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240655957","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00050922186,0.5294018,0.0009906503,0.012172745,0.025067624,0.00046884257,0.05158705,0.0021691178,0.37763298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049309116,0.57630813,0.0035891712,0.006245193,0.0035711166,0.0005632487,0.025793228,0.00091434876,0.37808457],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949604,0.00030095785,0.0007439946,0.0002942156,0.0031169092,0.0005834982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97439927,0.002644967,0.001436546,0.0010169776,0.018307785,0.002194512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029710256,0.0037994029,0.0052649267,0.05763975,0.0048761833,0.014539125,0.004499104,0.0026422923,0.25799504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015816282,0.0012909361,0.0011209501,0.111440055,0.002572277,0.0040770886,0.0023925423,0.0021969383,0.11690666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001842766,0.000011220515,0.00008482756,0.0026180884,0.000012730731,0.00002907811,0.00005440771,0.000043131546,0.00006288711,0.0011444609,0.92641693,0.069503695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039328665,0.000003295476,0.00046747416,0.001204147,0.000023506547,0.000038179096,0.00007541495,0.000014493888,0.000025509255,0.00019608276,0.9979358,0.000012146368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8447038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.886271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25799504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033738434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15136065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86307937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240803944","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.14656","title":"Wheatley, Rt Rev. Peter William, (born 7 Sept. 1947), Area Bishop of Edmonton, 1999–2014; an Honorary Assistant Bishop: Diocese of Southwark, since 2013; Diocese of London, since 2015; Diocese of Chichester, since 2015","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gerontology; History; Art; Medicine","score_opus":0.034342708648013524,"score_gpt":0.3143474812083674,"score_spread":0.2800047725603539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240803944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003179296,0.07785463,0.00044487877,0.19934653,0.022582298,0.00016544541,0.0025130343,0.00011949338,0.69379437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0072363773,0.009702862,0.00012756341,0.022993743,0.0012242842,0.00012508359,0.00022578564,0.00007106029,0.95829326],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988708,0.00021423775,0.0000584263,0.00017848992,0.000420044,0.0002579087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992889,0.00022165876,0.000060346916,0.00003353022,0.00026139166,0.00013408443],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001282367,0.0011026091,0.00036956108,0.0011073506,0.009213861,0.0034841408,0.0016159805,0.0071091773,0.063073866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003547088,0.0009542366,0.0004372279,0.0013509426,0.002471754,0.0032766326,0.002840055,0.009474394,0.025366535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062870563,0.0000054971088,0.00009986121,0.000032246553,0.0000012170012,0.000040254065,0.00047197152,0.000013128029,0.00002450406,0.008205465,0.987738,0.0033616312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003516778,0.0000023236769,0.0007832925,0.00014257147,0.0000018369827,0.000016807091,0.0005032357,0.000006334645,0.00003850007,0.0007183089,0.99777657,0.0000066557286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3443172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6279151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9369261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008661835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014173372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6846261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240894957","doi":"10.1093/9780198727255.003.0036","title":"Canada—British Columbia","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Legislation; Law; Scope (computer science); Government (linguistics); Politics; Work (physics); Public administration; Engineering","score_opus":0.044029671233593005,"score_gpt":0.27156478129789424,"score_spread":0.22753511006430124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240894957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026892815,0.018261654,0.00031958293,0.006777812,0.00072588195,0.000034860746,0.0029752392,0.00009035251,0.9681253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02221822,0.008708407,0.00053055957,0.0017139671,0.00006163212,0.000026598958,0.0012117291,0.00008080178,0.96544814],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965703,0.000020347723,0.000009266124,0.0000613644,0.0001382292,0.00011366986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995709,0.000026705737,0.000010204034,0.00001536269,0.00028568853,0.0000910142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022337059,0.00046900712,0.00027416673,0.0019369047,0.0080652945,0.003999955,0.0009785402,0.0010915487,0.089008294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050881156,0.00024391423,0.00017864889,0.004935975,0.0015594288,0.0011411477,0.0009859223,0.0014494288,0.010781399],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012052068,0.000012207457,0.0006589551,0.00021208123,0.0000039044885,0.00018198315,0.0015009545,0.00013385991,0.00020878125,0.09781178,0.80510634,0.09415705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011886539,0.0000010519065,0.00088925555,0.000110821675,0.0000012612529,0.000025964431,0.00037812142,0.000022714368,0.000046081357,0.0008858128,0.9976336,0.000004245462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98719144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089008294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05697084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.064424664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41335428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241035024","doi":"10.3138/tjt.35.2.232","title":"Toronto School of Theology: Theses Completed Academic Year 2018–19","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Sociology; Pedagogy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03747749280377985,"score_gpt":0.3408805945257472,"score_spread":0.3034031017219674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241035024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00915886,0.003778457,0.0004412308,0.06544768,0.03766559,0.0008242503,0.09895633,0.0014253737,0.7823022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010596026,0.0009453132,0.00018059123,0.00040813815,0.001065174,0.0001078195,0.0073607867,0.00023116086,0.97910494],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943482,0.00044642107,0.00017777839,0.00037187178,0.0031558168,0.0014998816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752177,0.0004884549,0.0004877869,0.00086173473,0.009790751,0.013153589],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042474316,0.0014134437,0.0011839523,0.0054699285,0.011600795,0.00996411,0.0023627777,0.002868401,0.60259837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011415029,0.0007905158,0.00072512875,0.0069901757,0.0022221655,0.002329464,0.004745103,0.003490259,0.28549996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035300855,0.000033024575,0.00039407832,0.000042924257,0.0000019279485,0.000057253113,0.00038554208,0.000019922058,0.000054153716,0.0011612856,0.9887322,0.009082487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012625852,0.000026089492,0.008390402,0.000096634896,0.0000021861638,0.00002828778,0.0013077831,0.000029191719,0.00012749227,0.0004848713,0.9894834,0.000011042826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25598758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6449155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39740163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025415948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04300388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5668452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241121742","doi":"10.3138/9781442663077-fm","title":"Frontmatter","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"ECW Press (Canada)","funders":"Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences; University of Toronto; Ontario Arts Council; Government of Canada; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Council for the Arts","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.03208755335491715,"score_gpt":0.23826388188082503,"score_spread":0.2061763285259079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241121742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018843675,0.0007947303,0.00027213726,0.0005827914,0.00047895362,0.000017435206,0.00035385037,0.00027045555,0.99704117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00059871515,0.0001943381,0.00007774833,0.00020860175,0.000031573425,0.0000050135204,0.00008452985,0.00007768414,0.9987218],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978155,0.000018574448,0.0000073696015,0.000056054898,0.000093093135,0.000043402124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997793,0.00004370828,0.000010499955,0.000030039831,0.00007557287,0.000060982522],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017782107,0.000559232,0.00040908926,0.0011674433,0.002048089,0.0034542144,0.0008129311,0.0017800158,0.8138892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074621674,0.00031340722,0.00035368465,0.0010204405,0.00053997146,0.0029449135,0.002181096,0.0016936065,0.5789656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020314972,0.000022656917,0.00012181662,0.00010273849,0.0000017606386,0.00011911713,0.0002852353,0.00004289845,0.0003834236,0.030375957,0.84134287,0.12718116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012646119,0.0000029905018,0.00010793439,0.00002915923,3.774363e-7,0.000038805316,0.000052281837,0.000016455888,0.00003984272,0.000770769,0.99893874,0.000001493433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055609653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024522612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1861108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012608093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000732003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26546448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241123400","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1681212","title":"Review of Guardianship, Custody and Access Under the Domestic Relations Act of Alberta (Part 4 of 6) – Guardianship. A Research Study of the Concept of Guardianship as Distinguished from Custody with Proposals for Reform .","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.053853029011960526,"score_gpt":0.40238432484578374,"score_spread":0.3485312958338232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241123400","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041464876,0.9954367,0.000021227464,0.0013883591,0.0004391213,0.000008113889,0.00013012701,0.0000022271845,0.0021594684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0068670986,0.9900315,0.00010817019,0.0010858129,0.00025962343,0.0000144846235,0.0002534412,0.000003197442,0.001376681],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795073,0.00045403108,0.00031613398,0.00014396192,0.0009244734,0.0002106917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99536765,0.00188141,0.000874539,0.0001095346,0.0015319654,0.00023492107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003597065,0.0005480452,0.0011796453,0.0062734983,0.0008072223,0.0015611545,0.001781311,0.0016973345,0.0037505499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007191895,0.0005376742,0.00055248133,0.009916703,0.0016650415,0.001025526,0.001026796,0.0013126482,0.0005207798],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022427525,0.000051628533,0.0030040422,0.058123503,0.0003437272,0.00026270817,0.0018426655,0.00075173576,0.00047400847,0.020508798,0.25325334,0.6611596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002588724,0.00007434796,0.02665839,0.043630242,0.00039561384,0.00023122983,0.00084201177,0.000056873912,0.0001667153,0.0012057603,0.9266831,0.000029743791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46381864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71253246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53618133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011934371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043757554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9222378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241430101","doi":"10.1177/153124450404200307","title":"Elijah and Ishmael: Assessing Cultural Identity in Canadian Child Custody Decisions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child custody; Identity (music); Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Criminology; Aesthetics; Art","score_opus":0.055573893221110914,"score_gpt":0.3959579417072403,"score_spread":0.3403840484861294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241430101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48857766,0.24870318,0.001110555,0.14959347,0.0028453832,0.0008564216,0.0027440495,0.000028522947,0.10554077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9117958,0.05687825,0.002335791,0.013177055,0.00032753128,0.00026610447,0.0006871868,0.000024887671,0.014507297],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98849535,0.0029187321,0.00078805315,0.00035858926,0.0058784885,0.0015607441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.937697,0.017355738,0.0020205278,0.0005815566,0.03987794,0.0024672165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021558432,0.00047168686,0.0006538342,0.0111320345,0.016357029,0.0065378495,0.002955159,0.0024521134,0.0029062112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10088135,0.00035473096,0.00048560902,0.013886139,0.0038382208,0.0023711426,0.0025387397,0.0021023243,0.00017154586],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048415826,0.00024477925,0.19884251,0.0038677475,0.00041117004,0.0014510251,0.088481255,0.0011774374,0.0005327892,0.05238791,0.2973896,0.35472962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014083044,0.00015133862,0.49447978,0.010813547,0.0016814466,0.00047979687,0.16932657,0.00076989096,0.0021068766,0.006134042,0.31361446,0.00030137578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9844243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99529415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07557012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07557012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19644387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5483022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241496052","doi":"10.29173/alr331","title":"Editors' Note","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.03775668322918225,"score_gpt":0.3358399519150401,"score_spread":0.2980832686858579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241496052","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021899948,0.0047292155,0.00021855069,0.52927375,0.4391865,0.00008773108,0.00051655987,0.0003040307,0.02546465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034549783,0.0026590507,0.0010165729,0.67173725,0.1338699,0.00024043604,0.0002588418,0.00020164908,0.18656129],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852359,0.0010842986,0.0010849729,0.0023724036,0.008777071,0.0014453197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94632745,0.0110203335,0.0018110785,0.0019219627,0.034757674,0.004161512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009222776,0.0012775096,0.0021957504,0.0027805774,0.0061270855,0.008956521,0.004865699,0.021257032,0.034191914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072210506,0.0010787993,0.0021724766,0.0032100086,0.0025071907,0.0039108503,0.0024472997,0.022601323,0.032712776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005626374,0.0000031527163,0.000030818683,0.000018918392,0.0000023970013,0.000032054213,0.000020210924,0.000008438676,0.000013044499,0.00048897794,0.9975471,0.0018292391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001167397,0.0000071032173,0.00034518493,0.00010977212,0.000010292314,0.000038041617,0.00006480559,0.000044333257,0.000062464664,0.0006257255,0.9986645,0.000016189844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061550107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1644994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061550107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008061122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024228502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12238371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241570141","doi":"10.3138/jcs.39.2.5","title":"Are Municipalities Creatures of the Provinces?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Creatures; Politics; Democracy; State (computer science); Local government; Government (linguistics); Everyday life; Sociology; Political science; Public administration; Political economy; Law; Geography; Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.07009286883118983,"score_gpt":0.34181375979116463,"score_spread":0.2717208909599748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241570141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3971805,0.00941882,0.0052209417,0.17532155,0.0008917104,0.00010924627,0.0010695164,0.00014764364,0.41064012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97639674,0.0022535922,0.0005588228,0.0030716914,0.0000650949,0.00001833979,0.00018042624,0.000036626676,0.017418705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950582,0.001242817,0.000113911316,0.00054850726,0.00092156173,0.002115069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966485,0.00046552735,0.00051250804,0.0003847388,0.0010863545,0.00090232614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024822885,0.00014882954,0.00030742696,0.00085088273,0.010978387,0.008655688,0.0012215065,0.0013181249,0.0068261563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009205141,0.00030357626,0.0002337789,0.0026784816,0.0169898,0.0060681077,0.0034383687,0.0020489115,0.0007452246],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001307212,0.00003225453,0.03651747,0.0001792738,0.000028843811,0.0004910615,0.07453692,0.00032566884,0.00037707514,0.81407595,0.031921577,0.041383237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003705661,0.000025874591,0.04423788,0.00036495237,0.000054115688,0.0004152113,0.20513357,0.00028581888,0.00039895962,0.061105266,0.6878547,0.0000866556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86138076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8800888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9711823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028817706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053671956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27887118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242019933","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u157961","title":"Newnham, Ven. Obadiah Samuel, (23 March 1848–13 May 1932), Archdeacon of Fredericton since 1907","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ven; Art; History; Humanities","score_opus":0.05413239036701066,"score_gpt":0.33952079927601475,"score_spread":0.2853884089090041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242019933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028635561,0.073278375,0.00046016244,0.026342893,0.017065518,0.000038992574,0.0027814752,0.00012280756,0.8770462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007916255,0.00786525,0.00012455674,0.0017729881,0.000570391,0.000017835438,0.00026581355,0.00007751707,0.9813892],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997906,0.000038363087,0.000009912321,0.00005069649,0.000065878616,0.000044488894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998293,0.000039677638,0.000013810113,0.000012624369,0.00007259352,0.000031938904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040458541,0.00051169744,0.0003308251,0.000893518,0.0050493246,0.0025541538,0.0006387819,0.0012753736,0.10314364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011656332,0.00024236081,0.00015641458,0.0012645496,0.0008936645,0.0027734598,0.0017374461,0.002063739,0.029155271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031529817,0.000005510707,0.00020891328,0.00009051541,0.0000018395558,0.0001956153,0.002505143,0.000018715964,0.00007757485,0.02796426,0.9310804,0.03782003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.3275704e-7,0.0000012155313,0.00021718015,0.00007232703,4.4845703e-7,0.000032192867,0.0003605126,0.0000021074547,0.000024745965,0.00059528736,0.9986921,0.0000014048879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053539094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27026257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9464609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002744094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016524846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3450498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242982682","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14663463","title":"The dawn of the Somali written word: an analysis of the creation and implementation of the Somali written language","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Somali; Orthography; History; Linguistics; Sociology; Philosophy; Reading (process)","score_opus":0.021821850348758137,"score_gpt":0.35698581639710525,"score_spread":0.3351639660483471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242982682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9663693,0.00096674246,0.0019072357,0.002106968,0.00006570159,0.000089052155,0.00008886569,0.000016169126,0.028390005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907136,0.0010575603,0.0019158503,0.00041315524,0.00002017988,0.000105338666,0.000090801375,0.000044389406,0.0056389887],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99631846,0.0022881615,0.00015998195,0.0002787276,0.00057891227,0.00037575923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909792,0.0062088356,0.001033274,0.0002904098,0.0010164957,0.0004717702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051995963,0.00034962606,0.00040019295,0.001929911,0.008536534,0.009166824,0.00117267,0.0013861946,0.0028478818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011177905,0.00059433095,0.00021088446,0.0028978705,0.012211969,0.0053488216,0.0040390175,0.0034127287,0.0005348452],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011166376,0.000011986526,0.0016616723,0.000064180706,0.0000016737403,0.00036260992,0.9888038,0.000006890843,0.00039782454,0.0037147242,0.00023835179,0.004725164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017663723,0.00002266066,0.005920044,0.00012914075,0.0000035663127,0.00016887102,0.9793138,0.00003353695,0.0004097192,0.00057941815,0.013410175,0.0000072801354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074459123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02024732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009166824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066963267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066308314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048585474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243083972","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u200152","title":"McCorkill, Hon. John Charles, (31 Aug. 1854–10 March 1920), a Puisne Judge, Superior Court, Montreal, since 1906","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; History; Art; Art history; Political science","score_opus":0.03473295275430472,"score_gpt":0.3108135794008903,"score_spread":0.2760806266465856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243083972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043415674,0.032760534,0.0005860998,0.041097973,0.008592598,0.000181642,0.0062581743,0.00023816919,0.9059433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008792504,0.002978029,0.00012538127,0.0047279964,0.00028741086,0.000032231997,0.0003051684,0.00007705761,0.9826744],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934775,0.000043208758,0.000021534594,0.00010789192,0.00026702692,0.00021266678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919087,0.00012167173,0.000031072854,0.000020831902,0.0005227243,0.00011290914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065032084,0.0006004603,0.00043767932,0.0014173796,0.012408045,0.00351268,0.001470359,0.0027965792,0.10504752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028724158,0.00055949995,0.00028347957,0.0013779091,0.001108643,0.0021111479,0.0015543913,0.0035186019,0.022647675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013060438,0.0000040547184,0.00026146072,0.00003530925,0.0000016031134,0.0001618279,0.00067122007,0.000012442192,0.00005711734,0.007855928,0.9810766,0.009849369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022933168,0.0000026787486,0.0009260131,0.0000632047,0.000001969009,0.000025786212,0.00032015788,0.0000070982524,0.000056986013,0.00039333798,0.99819297,0.0000074875165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.762645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94684017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.237355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010653245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010289268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47750562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243979594","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190927301.003.0008","title":"Conclusion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Indigenous; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.053582513901164815,"score_gpt":0.3129889558738929,"score_spread":0.2594064419727281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243979594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015925972,0.0027115624,0.004520566,0.049383245,0.011479561,0.00016757379,0.002300981,0.00043788322,0.92740613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034648046,0.0035445131,0.0038079207,0.028462533,0.0025376577,0.00020588996,0.0039936076,0.0005157256,0.92228407],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979329,0.00033571772,0.000073575146,0.0003687868,0.00094171433,0.00034731033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669063,0.00033513378,0.00009014469,0.00027642288,0.0022491717,0.0003584968],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001761059,0.00065748254,0.0003486988,0.001312242,0.0026078892,0.007385826,0.0016771636,0.0029102515,0.26566872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067213397,0.00023727621,0.0006702751,0.0010448094,0.0012066598,0.0034021095,0.0028841111,0.0034039696,0.11328856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004283783,0.000030056222,0.0006381397,0.00027503824,0.000008758795,0.00014122599,0.000626587,0.00018034781,0.00020847558,0.13252501,0.7978007,0.067522824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044023564,0.0000055393816,0.0003208343,0.00024297679,0.0000034739157,0.00003974181,0.00043231482,0.000043327545,0.00016532501,0.008745063,0.98999256,0.0000043064947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011239483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009150606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73433125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00537969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005246038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244206916","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107706798","title":"Sir Edward Coke and the Reformation of the Laws","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Coke; Ignorance; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Opposition (politics); Context (archaeology); Settlement (finance); Political science; History; Philosophy; Engineering; Economics; Archaeology; Politics","score_opus":0.018580765575071302,"score_gpt":0.22291956542862384,"score_spread":0.20433879985355255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244206916","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058573866,0.092248656,0.00089215307,0.10083388,0.0033051497,0.0000292246,0.000025707255,0.000032661996,0.7967752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18064383,0.047779035,0.0009852928,0.025011333,0.0016506946,0.000064954445,0.000036631114,0.000081263635,0.743747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846053,0.00054753263,0.00003723641,0.00019607681,0.0005339215,0.00022470971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986854,0.00071551814,0.00007585397,0.000074746014,0.00030580114,0.00014258106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010255798,0.0003598301,0.00027328334,0.0009370074,0.006033954,0.005912176,0.00049835414,0.002841365,0.006368478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040617846,0.00026642173,0.000102352344,0.00091220293,0.013079467,0.0045687044,0.0021139574,0.0064702453,0.0016223497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015711363,0.000015024923,0.000118885444,0.00007876852,0.0000018198327,0.00015691067,0.015047179,0.000082773135,0.00010559943,0.70774585,0.25388944,0.022741975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016976926,0.000004849541,0.00015222518,0.00014652734,9.0433485e-7,0.00008736798,0.0018391105,0.000028359687,0.00006500196,0.0136612635,0.98400754,0.0000051577867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041888278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046550736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041888278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009220659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068691205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08328891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245123283","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2348724","title":"Rights-Based Strategies to Address Homelessness and Poverty in Canada: The Constitutional Framework","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Political science; Criminology; Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.011720409636074293,"score_gpt":0.27050495564973565,"score_spread":0.25878454601366135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245123283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15724565,0.0049304697,0.008070759,0.2788984,0.00076098053,0.0005832626,0.0007424789,0.00016810703,0.5485999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9343378,0.0013850563,0.0033643357,0.017831093,0.00017707191,0.0002440339,0.00010713928,0.00006215602,0.042491384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9813208,0.0028798103,0.00041798243,0.0008968996,0.004463989,0.010020563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98697656,0.0039151656,0.0005625169,0.0007121135,0.003878255,0.003955417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012280296,0.0006542743,0.0009284432,0.0030484695,0.03361545,0.016795786,0.0060055824,0.01045663,0.008922568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022613075,0.00079609663,0.0008770261,0.0030109074,0.032147527,0.005070334,0.010531495,0.009981468,0.00030311267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023491659,0.00007146832,0.002995545,0.000058177524,0.000024373867,0.00014683687,0.0070168697,0.0010628315,0.00017365784,0.95974904,0.015255681,0.013422003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033922025,0.00010868311,0.03572375,0.0012317296,0.0002894391,0.00025493142,0.04247472,0.006146807,0.0012170562,0.46676415,0.44504422,0.00040529174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9886354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9933869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13278691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13278691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4207794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.963441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245275061","doi":"10.3138/ecf.22.3.443","title":"Reforming Character: William Law and the English Theophrastan Tradition","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Rhetorical question; Moral character; Extant taxon; Literature; Order (exchange); Rhetorical device; Law; Sociology; Aesthetics; History; Philosophy; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.011036357018676361,"score_gpt":0.24688000211449695,"score_spread":0.2358436450958206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245275061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3959473,0.012509718,0.0022229652,0.0432224,0.0005584173,0.000022119095,0.000013850319,0.00003377355,0.54546946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767666,0.0012930202,0.00022105277,0.0013394097,0.000112607646,0.000007109424,0.0000024812516,0.000011830574,0.020245925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986694,0.00091063464,0.000028206014,0.00009029936,0.00015443281,0.00014709603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869674,0.00080474716,0.0001483825,0.00008011981,0.00013936625,0.00013071526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014585332,0.00014200251,0.00013861644,0.00059891364,0.0059923977,0.0053834748,0.00040507864,0.0013694109,0.0017937416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027736034,0.00012246783,0.00006205629,0.00039373565,0.02147688,0.0033067162,0.0020008704,0.0023394255,0.00019296867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001923915,0.000036763566,0.0011117104,0.000039540755,0.0000027680064,0.00035707976,0.23127131,0.00004606833,0.00026368335,0.7464904,0.004840388,0.0155209005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021767952,0.00007516775,0.0033501198,0.0003141341,0.000009883031,0.0004953645,0.106688164,0.0002787805,0.0008465584,0.12328549,0.7646043,0.000030276531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008221963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015988398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008221963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040458157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014514461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029354572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245396718","doi":"10.3138/flor.20.035","title":"University of New Brunswick","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Florilegium","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SAINT; History; Middle English; Classics; Archaeology; Art history","score_opus":0.03172135274545302,"score_gpt":0.26994951715617926,"score_spread":0.23822816441072625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245396718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038952553,0.015903423,0.00057172764,0.020388402,0.0027758458,0.00011933118,0.005920175,0.00022054133,0.95020527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009495819,0.005810188,0.0007270268,0.0012477292,0.00007449527,0.00006099029,0.0017917798,0.00013072666,0.98066115],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987004,0.00011968298,0.00008841111,0.00029709694,0.0004376398,0.00035676901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793303,0.00023650586,0.00011381511,0.00020929033,0.00095050986,0.00055686507],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007298966,0.0008318016,0.0007193198,0.0019832058,0.005792813,0.0066465163,0.0019339399,0.0018239823,0.40348786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033329513,0.0005561053,0.00039077425,0.0039610057,0.0012780725,0.003100326,0.0029685097,0.0031336036,0.13317963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107207445,0.000061917395,0.0028863163,0.0006224679,0.000020237125,0.0018314726,0.0014560209,0.00020585388,0.0011804673,0.072624326,0.68797743,0.23102628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055552414,0.0000046687746,0.0017265929,0.00025967983,0.0000029726502,0.00013048186,0.00063461944,0.000025852796,0.00013766195,0.0012028734,0.9958549,0.000014109791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50820243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75930697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59651214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014181349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025521921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98938775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245692135","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0013","title":"Contending Sovereignties","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Constitution; Legislature; Negotiation; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Relation (database); Indigenous rights; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06963348852814599,"score_gpt":0.2711996996659675,"score_spread":0.20156621113782153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245692135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010283298,0.004715613,0.0045020194,0.030426636,0.00047662444,0.000024821169,0.000043928678,0.0000138223095,0.9495132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86131275,0.0051438636,0.0021416235,0.013021853,0.0008619445,0.00009799644,0.0001013553,0.00007096629,0.11724767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926212,0.0026585483,0.00016730803,0.0010540131,0.0022109707,0.0012879835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957808,0.0025248667,0.00014149887,0.0003873279,0.00087620044,0.00028935194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008291744,0.00044463502,0.0006464654,0.0014760781,0.013364249,0.011515892,0.0018169319,0.005279911,0.0086362865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009418139,0.00034831258,0.0004007931,0.0015057556,0.077334054,0.008732591,0.0072404644,0.009821412,0.00075483887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.0040903e-7,5.765211e-7,0.000019451903,0.0000041346034,5.8249753e-7,0.0000145917875,0.0026043493,0.00001983851,0.00001314215,0.99565226,0.001219941,0.00045043812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007776954,0.0000051648212,0.00021360064,0.00026322005,0.0000066498496,0.000057553305,0.005862523,0.0002133602,0.00010771832,0.7672425,0.22600824,0.000011769756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14599791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14305308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14599791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025155058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0208106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2902962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245890390","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u29380","title":"Marsh, Rt Rev. Edward Frank, (25 Oct. 1935–28 June 2023), Bishop of Central Newfoundland, 1990–2000; Diocesan Administrator, Diocese of Central Newfoundland, 2005","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marsh; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.0281213784703585,"score_gpt":0.3060987456668407,"score_spread":0.2779773671964822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245890390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022042054,0.028501663,0.00037959844,0.045565337,0.0056799003,0.00015385772,0.012905153,0.00037816918,0.9042321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001897103,0.0020334127,0.00005053569,0.0043980097,0.000104344246,0.000037128808,0.0004700879,0.000046193185,0.9909633],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926025,0.00004601335,0.000030255622,0.00009308764,0.00026404543,0.00030634683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992107,0.00010735412,0.000035687797,0.000034580764,0.0005026438,0.000108966946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008507436,0.0008700536,0.00045352452,0.0011353964,0.0095513165,0.004125792,0.0016010703,0.005884892,0.18509659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024780533,0.00088719476,0.00042833417,0.0017278428,0.0010278324,0.0026305653,0.0020155609,0.0052310023,0.084990464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010055716,0.000004801294,0.0001002529,0.000026868205,9.0477886e-7,0.00003514372,0.00010507096,0.000014969321,0.000020352527,0.0021363436,0.992496,0.005049222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038128335,0.000002533629,0.0015917146,0.000111566194,0.0000023673363,0.000015371508,0.000276015,0.000013456675,0.000029626024,0.00025609683,0.9976897,0.000007719041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83503956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9515172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18509659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010915895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018827058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61920977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246588091","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226474.003.0003","title":"2 Canada: From Privy Council to Supreme Court","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Originalism; Constitutionality; Statutory interpretation; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Presumption; Statute; Supreme court; Legislative history; Charter; Parliament; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05400134769111276,"score_gpt":0.23850797413471092,"score_spread":0.18450662644359817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246588091","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023129482,0.012539797,0.00079539,0.024723034,0.0007652014,0.000031920936,0.00032944756,0.00008510984,0.95841724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13556278,0.008390935,0.0017151561,0.016299387,0.00041510898,0.00008247357,0.00036350475,0.00018980385,0.83698094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733424,0.00021368329,0.000041592237,0.00036259307,0.0014192039,0.00062868354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990422,0.0001815618,0.000027566904,0.00007080216,0.0005025686,0.0001753181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090362673,0.0004819326,0.00033660606,0.0014144449,0.016008358,0.012667502,0.0015729181,0.004805395,0.021559387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030321274,0.00048550998,0.000257851,0.002927848,0.009027294,0.0028001107,0.0024306367,0.005118491,0.002459026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036759766,0.000004222687,0.0001567512,0.000024936402,0.0000013684696,0.00006906772,0.0016209136,0.000112317495,0.000044388365,0.78319544,0.20296308,0.011803801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039283555,0.000002136003,0.0005461695,0.0001247476,0.0000031513214,0.0000386908,0.0008590949,0.000113788796,0.000049135804,0.03052641,0.967722,0.0000108405175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96304566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9809911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08309579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08309579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1307406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.602905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246673257","doi":"10.29173/alr95","title":"Introduction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.02469429660280269,"score_gpt":0.31149882489275854,"score_spread":0.28680452828995584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246673257","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012316401,0.15352017,0.001635099,0.15285547,0.09989109,0.00015396507,0.003584836,0.00068700634,0.5864407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0095938165,0.04610239,0.00088820915,0.07794788,0.024455324,0.00008669493,0.00279822,0.00028287063,0.8378445],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966955,0.00026088214,0.00009157938,0.00038529088,0.0020975526,0.0004691888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933768,0.0009222842,0.0002524522,0.00034429636,0.004326427,0.0007776602],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023533392,0.000667811,0.0007443864,0.0033411267,0.0027904143,0.0057772603,0.002441997,0.004060658,0.14973144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070257373,0.0003670104,0.0007055629,0.0030385153,0.0018600702,0.0019587816,0.0017091834,0.003651281,0.05215245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009981383,0.000006812778,0.00016221491,0.00017944872,0.000003958063,0.000023779454,0.000051757484,0.000042171578,0.00006538978,0.011538215,0.96178126,0.026135027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016871143,0.0000026043858,0.00055020716,0.00019311473,0.0000027820192,0.000016407848,0.000030183199,0.0000119109345,0.000018348617,0.0010331079,0.99813545,0.0000041493213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19986776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32680827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85026854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0099964915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019441271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5009016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246688545","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316403594","title":"Is Killing People Right?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Ideal (ethics); Abortion; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.026967503562718896,"score_gpt":0.24628355659926518,"score_spread":0.21931605303654628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246688545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060849423,0.02141899,0.0017226575,0.090429164,0.004086749,0.00003207649,0.000048405615,0.00004463044,0.87613237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24425572,0.014302077,0.0022642247,0.08298943,0.0020107217,0.00010915327,0.00011472333,0.00012414182,0.6538298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997081,0.0014098961,0.00007145182,0.00024447954,0.0007474563,0.00044579816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983436,0.0010143644,0.000108788525,0.00012147746,0.00020730551,0.00020449854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028121541,0.00036733696,0.00030243807,0.00048677804,0.0071027414,0.0065863547,0.00072570215,0.0035192855,0.01149309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064299945,0.00020697685,0.00022182293,0.0004736233,0.021577317,0.0065571014,0.0030695696,0.005573037,0.003289346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060978828,0.000010902773,0.00021812766,0.000048906855,0.0000028973989,0.00018567809,0.023730703,0.000024087254,0.00008050046,0.6994263,0.24964975,0.026615964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002830374,0.000009803161,0.0002933103,0.00022019714,0.0000026583346,0.0002038772,0.014008208,0.000018813607,0.000081451966,0.076154865,0.9089989,0.000005171626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0078292675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018517237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01149309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026834782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035485532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038448215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246908656","doi":"10.1017/9781780688480.008","title":"Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Intersentia eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Federalism; Federalist; Political science; Jurisdiction; Legislature; Criminal jurisdiction; Separation of powers; State (computer science); Charter","score_opus":0.026237041538020905,"score_gpt":0.26569745161836567,"score_spread":0.23946041008034477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246908656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014229404,0.004720403,0.0009827535,0.011317449,0.001992511,0.00012579652,0.01390781,0.000613696,0.96491665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015223642,0.0050965175,0.0017215755,0.0053433385,0.00018942452,0.00007611334,0.009301688,0.00029996605,0.96274775],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841464,0.000069887465,0.00004770963,0.0003184152,0.000750468,0.00039890787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749833,0.00009173246,0.000054934048,0.00011867474,0.001802066,0.00043417365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067081547,0.00082495995,0.00066770124,0.0016290002,0.008121274,0.0063714,0.001516342,0.0021024174,0.35102633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027976048,0.0003993052,0.00067735463,0.0025372212,0.0012135718,0.0015978819,0.0021304667,0.0018224275,0.1067686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052513893,0.00001663345,0.0010305101,0.00021260645,0.000013025351,0.00023092522,0.0002205196,0.00012229447,0.00025855197,0.036782112,0.891195,0.06986529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004913433,0.0000033564013,0.0008103686,0.0000685636,0.0000043099885,0.00004443239,0.0001288399,0.00004988679,0.000057489313,0.0010751132,0.9977441,0.000008760452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8988739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9369211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35102633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026244437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.065310255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246967681","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u180165","title":"MacKeigan, Hon. Ian Malcolm, (11 April 1915–1 May 1996), Supernumerary Justice of Appeal Division of Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, 1985–90 (Chief Justice of Nova Scotia and Chief Justice of Appeal Division of Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, 1973–85)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Appeal; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Law; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03925478001180984,"score_gpt":0.3139855815065919,"score_spread":0.2747308014947821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246967681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042499118,0.102219395,0.0005803807,0.25934193,0.03852068,0.0003087935,0.007220813,0.00035778718,0.58720034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013856495,0.01645476,0.0002949841,0.02954466,0.0019034174,0.0001441974,0.00065521646,0.00015191562,0.93699425],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990061,0.00010604729,0.00007807231,0.00016680271,0.00037767907,0.0002653179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983683,0.00043361302,0.00014114741,0.00006257204,0.0007326329,0.0002617193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001418302,0.0008765703,0.0005098228,0.0013153946,0.008822715,0.00434891,0.0019082923,0.005573872,0.05833523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004071576,0.00095574145,0.00035104735,0.0018456859,0.0012119723,0.0025726699,0.0017798236,0.007664485,0.027615529],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000795706,0.0000029670111,0.00019024652,0.00004016267,0.0000010733153,0.000055073153,0.00035791597,0.000008650835,0.000029577348,0.0027788489,0.9921814,0.004346258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005445228,0.0000037993307,0.003784894,0.00018181834,0.0000028626796,0.00003840314,0.00067170704,0.000012127471,0.00006462802,0.0005029735,0.99471694,0.0000142841345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59985745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8599658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40014255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011020549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013177907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80499816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247129288","doi":"10.1017/9780511984457.047","title":"XLI","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Quarter (Canadian coin); Beauty; Spring (device); Creatures; Chorus; Visual arts; Natural (archaeology); Art history; History; Archaeology; Engineering; Literature","score_opus":0.043369558225798785,"score_gpt":0.33181889357726474,"score_spread":0.28844933535146594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247129288","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033649476,0.003169516,0.0015221687,0.0064977864,0.01557175,0.00029028775,0.009492027,0.0016068707,0.96151304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013589697,0.0012125465,0.000415785,0.0020959505,0.0025294677,0.0001251557,0.0037873907,0.00041382664,0.98806083],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888855,0.00014842613,0.000071341594,0.00020483117,0.00055445207,0.00013239785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704415,0.00047887056,0.00015986567,0.00035775424,0.001546388,0.00041300277],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090836635,0.0011905489,0.0007555247,0.0023500926,0.0018633326,0.007319112,0.0013178141,0.0019310961,0.8731846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057697687,0.0004898151,0.0006794416,0.0028753264,0.00061015546,0.003183553,0.0026357234,0.0021002246,0.78147864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001847657,0.000017462295,0.00014330195,0.00013457262,0.0000030125234,0.00003833597,0.00004739864,0.000029517145,0.00014886586,0.003226418,0.9534106,0.04278196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004265942,0.0000077730265,0.00027699673,0.00010356723,0.0000010975212,0.000044302822,0.00005691721,0.000018634877,0.00004559299,0.00067836704,0.9987588,0.0000035933042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004133931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050921957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12681538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025113774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018430453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247833030","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u246120","title":"Yu, Rt Rev. Patrick Tin-Sik, (born 8 July 1951), a Suffragan Bishop of Toronto (Area Bishop of York-Scarborough), 2006–Jan. 2017","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tin; History; Art; Archaeology; Materials science; Metallurgy","score_opus":0.05116875827232603,"score_gpt":0.3225904178331207,"score_spread":0.27142165956079467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247833030","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004255772,0.08683945,0.00062966306,0.14229316,0.015481374,0.00011429469,0.006817946,0.00029217362,0.7432761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008505954,0.009398305,0.00010555668,0.009823715,0.0005568362,0.000045249635,0.00064238155,0.000099341836,0.9708226],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945813,0.00007332483,0.0000215523,0.00008707423,0.00019140745,0.00016840339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994698,0.00010936452,0.000026655713,0.000025617293,0.00027358072,0.00009491946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008879932,0.0006004846,0.00039564326,0.00089318596,0.0075301556,0.0033223568,0.00095214363,0.00370354,0.08997329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028436736,0.0003804742,0.0002620239,0.0012141926,0.0011789566,0.0022967577,0.0021577228,0.0034959968,0.03475944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007970939,0.0000039772244,0.00014665339,0.000039213686,0.0000010373192,0.000051145016,0.00039790873,0.000012416333,0.000023387442,0.010986528,0.98267454,0.00565513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017029633,0.0000019402657,0.0006662788,0.00008275198,9.597192e-7,0.00001844192,0.00042900754,0.000008144382,0.000039447998,0.00084389193,0.9979018,0.0000056920703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27983573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49398673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7201643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004982052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007863088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55641377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247836551","doi":"10.1177/1531244503252143","title":"Family/Child Judicial Dispute Resolution (JDR): An Overview of One Canadian Court’s Settlement Conference Approach to the Pretrial Resolution of Family and Child Welfare/Protection Matters","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Child protection; Dispute resolution; Law; Family court; Family law; Resolution (logic); Welfare; Political science; Child custody; Sociology; Psychology; Criminology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.11223655617372083,"score_gpt":0.3229660813699467,"score_spread":0.21072952519622587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247836551","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03627769,0.55543244,0.0051248283,0.07667779,0.0026007574,0.002442339,0.00090809865,0.00018859007,0.32034746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39150265,0.43485266,0.022081546,0.04487708,0.0019025586,0.0011181537,0.0013295166,0.0002620629,0.10207368],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9796687,0.00422957,0.001230608,0.0009961908,0.009536987,0.0043380377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97405034,0.008499532,0.00092824886,0.00049405673,0.013864009,0.0021639005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02576888,0.0007453223,0.0010054326,0.01544034,0.024076734,0.015089194,0.0049072145,0.0055912267,0.003696223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02242001,0.0011523794,0.0009058801,0.019590808,0.006856621,0.002436386,0.0033751638,0.0048315166,0.00046212494],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120012,0.0003547279,0.005540067,0.005883551,0.000094807845,0.0016667938,0.026324473,0.0020050455,0.0018673632,0.16262543,0.18994994,0.6035678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003989256,0.0001234714,0.031892095,0.002330848,0.00010095719,0.0005186046,0.008262254,0.00045473283,0.0006532497,0.0048523825,0.95060205,0.00016945954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9571819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121284604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.121284604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25742775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8799855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248238039","doi":"10.5040/9781474202015.ch-008","title":"Canada : Application and Implications of the Doctrine of Common Law Aboriginal Customary Title","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Common law; History; Political science; Genealogy","score_opus":0.017014654814876642,"score_gpt":0.26856667292750763,"score_spread":0.251552018112631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248238039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011689178,0.01605061,0.0011842084,0.03437396,0.0009464076,0.00006771865,0.00030252957,0.000053008294,0.93533236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46080604,0.01808148,0.0030648687,0.009821032,0.00041195162,0.00009488234,0.00019085154,0.00013419056,0.50739473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964652,0.000427695,0.000072853036,0.00035906438,0.0014075472,0.001267668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760383,0.00063945376,0.00007359334,0.0001144188,0.0012707444,0.00029798853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018430022,0.00054440653,0.00062533416,0.002236232,0.021661835,0.011650034,0.0028946083,0.005124835,0.014598442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059814835,0.00063857523,0.0003726379,0.004387539,0.015796404,0.0030537478,0.0027258848,0.006087061,0.00092177215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008106305,0.000007850549,0.00026589504,0.00004571503,0.0000043603513,0.00012250264,0.007745861,0.0001501061,0.000040394152,0.93112135,0.051519398,0.008968376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020470288,0.0000133959675,0.0037169615,0.00060529885,0.000033133274,0.00020407456,0.01740369,0.000716269,0.00023410612,0.13209434,0.84488654,0.00007163827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9948264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1029345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1029345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24331874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7468456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248421674","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.12626","title":"Curtis, Most Rev. John Barry, (born 19 June 1933), Honorary Assistant, St Matthew’s Anglican Church, Ottawa, since 2008; Archbishop of Calgary, 1994–99; Metropolitan of Rupert’s Land, 1994–99","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Archbishop; Metropolitan area; History; Art; Theology; Archaeology; Classics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02782214721456786,"score_gpt":0.3053838903012935,"score_spread":0.2775617430867256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248421674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013423864,0.1253333,0.00044266676,0.13621771,0.013179241,0.00011811372,0.004136961,0.00028334872,0.7189462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005874246,0.015467022,0.00017187028,0.016699111,0.0009784423,0.00010275243,0.0003333873,0.00016123347,0.9602119],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987478,0.00020861377,0.00007587311,0.00019867165,0.0005381628,0.00023082829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988213,0.00022869413,0.00008322589,0.00005137873,0.0006521715,0.00016319969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010248501,0.0011851392,0.0005903125,0.0017333382,0.011517244,0.0045172274,0.0018085662,0.006053745,0.09071326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003670088,0.0007915179,0.00034473304,0.0031740614,0.0027984043,0.0043597836,0.0022893362,0.0059811887,0.050735556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036594056,0.000002347818,0.000042932767,0.0000331778,6.0269645e-7,0.000014749261,0.0005795708,0.0000057240904,0.000011549754,0.0048025576,0.99152803,0.002975117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001879541,0.0000013637083,0.00038735676,0.00008748234,0.0000011185256,0.000011095508,0.0006413863,0.0000033130484,0.000018559022,0.00070191873,0.99813986,0.000004785042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60778004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8326426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39221996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012998388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014274322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78905964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248931395","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u226214","title":"Grimmer, Hon. W. C. Hazen, (31 Oct. 1858–3 Oct. 1945), Judge, Court of Appeal and Chancery Court, New Brunswick, 1914; Court of Divorce and Matrimonial Causes, 1932","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.030735459742518526,"score_gpt":0.30570539162414617,"score_spread":0.27496993188162766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248931395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047128717,0.05040863,0.0004438949,0.05435742,0.008501478,0.00019464557,0.008757915,0.00014270566,0.87248045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016357297,0.007645637,0.00021164241,0.009315181,0.00052162306,0.00006583255,0.0008472752,0.00006428142,0.96497124],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994597,0.00005278341,0.000030722564,0.000079730526,0.000245659,0.000131399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965715,0.00007774889,0.00003389821,0.000013942679,0.00017834108,0.000038927254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006312446,0.0006278064,0.00027411003,0.0012721192,0.006018211,0.0018786151,0.0012218893,0.0024664549,0.080093175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020122966,0.00047453752,0.0002350428,0.0015965125,0.00087604683,0.0016908227,0.0011212843,0.0039289305,0.025801064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014251462,0.000004485589,0.00022019428,0.00003664683,0.0000011946994,0.000088557346,0.000448154,0.000020030964,0.000054430853,0.008280715,0.9831579,0.0076733823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000452987,0.0000035139615,0.001895427,0.00008989194,0.0000016033177,0.000029741388,0.00034597304,0.0000102453,0.00009175848,0.0007602172,0.9967589,0.000008125409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53237456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83297855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46762544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073557985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061307745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94075876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249105100","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.40948","title":"Exner, Most Rev. Adam, (born 24 Dec. 1928), Archbishop of Vancouver, (RC), 1991–2004, now Archbishop Emeritus","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Archbishop; Art; Classics","score_opus":0.04283209462957198,"score_gpt":0.3226834047575462,"score_spread":0.2798513101279742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249105100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031239374,0.23045325,0.0006513512,0.07136725,0.013493524,0.00008610459,0.0040501924,0.0002815536,0.67649287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006341737,0.020681323,0.00014504768,0.0039623105,0.0003922388,0.00003001764,0.00044693943,0.00009010967,0.96791023],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953175,0.00006463796,0.000025282865,0.000077198114,0.00018440705,0.000116677125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960667,0.00009149612,0.000016091664,0.0000183322,0.00020795138,0.000059443708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005310628,0.0007751269,0.00048010517,0.0017176274,0.007415112,0.0036929213,0.00089979236,0.0027981235,0.0920566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002002769,0.0005379684,0.00020774361,0.0020490764,0.0010949449,0.0020212845,0.0015277141,0.0031938413,0.042787917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011184046,0.0000049362166,0.00013848314,0.000057729238,0.0000011382255,0.000069385635,0.000551598,0.000018086814,0.000027033499,0.006899995,0.9694633,0.022757038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010834872,0.0000014242727,0.0006124958,0.000108816246,8.2826944e-7,0.00003102085,0.00045986826,0.000005438343,0.000036932302,0.00065811176,0.99808013,0.000003906266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32089797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6591817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32089797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045085596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042477725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6380603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249151198","doi":"10.3138/tjt.34.2.311","title":"Toronto School of Theology Theses Completed Academic Year 2017–18","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Sociology; Mathematics education; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.060580314462321164,"score_gpt":0.37093291898398106,"score_spread":0.3103526045216599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249151198","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012051787,0.0020837206,0.00043676991,0.04582918,0.019294925,0.00059120986,0.052091394,0.0009103866,0.86671066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014548845,0.0006189332,0.00020367368,0.00036733563,0.00060427684,0.00008521832,0.0044907974,0.00016854782,0.9789124],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99451953,0.0004531104,0.00017280251,0.00037147818,0.0028698754,0.0016131923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966921,0.00048520425,0.0005756605,0.0010164907,0.010665357,0.020336308],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004182091,0.0015248901,0.0014182202,0.0047225044,0.014965195,0.010966247,0.002264069,0.002348825,0.5774264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009975179,0.0009110846,0.0008525463,0.0056218994,0.0025523312,0.0023145778,0.0049586557,0.0035602145,0.2384574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036341327,0.000055310844,0.00080844574,0.000043416007,0.0000028094278,0.00006334601,0.00058634195,0.000036736197,0.00006114883,0.0024739099,0.9853476,0.010484509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000142600875,0.000038381404,0.00997119,0.00009119622,0.0000036571068,0.00003374431,0.0019941847,0.000052888652,0.0001511202,0.0007469604,0.98689055,0.000011803237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36591867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80369705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03421624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07348995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72757757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250215610","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u198616","title":"Jones, Rt Rev. Llewellyn, (11 Oct. 1840–9 Jan. 1918), Bishop of Newfoundland and Bermuda since 1878","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art history; History","score_opus":0.036385807036861645,"score_gpt":0.31553892994011706,"score_spread":0.27915312290325545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250215610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004824547,0.055305436,0.00033591635,0.061934203,0.0050434833,0.00011061954,0.00656765,0.0001709343,0.8657072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0085207205,0.0051554316,0.00008974882,0.009782231,0.00033404044,0.0000599601,0.0003692758,0.00005807898,0.9756305],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999019,0.00008557016,0.00003969595,0.00012828475,0.00028214452,0.00044527967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933904,0.00012620303,0.000046056975,0.000027240845,0.00036744046,0.00009401053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008413358,0.00088290754,0.00039947213,0.0013271373,0.018415153,0.004997049,0.0013805743,0.0069489796,0.07961679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022363702,0.0008911985,0.00044672782,0.0019372765,0.0023069782,0.0031155518,0.002327292,0.0059847934,0.022181923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001629465,0.000010048987,0.0003533272,0.00005194866,0.0000022607364,0.00011900016,0.0010666434,0.000025014515,0.00003832113,0.01181991,0.97868586,0.0078113545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040804516,0.0000033715662,0.0028735849,0.00018416012,0.000003930372,0.000025328987,0.0009478241,0.00000998325,0.000052821262,0.0006560438,0.99522674,0.000012071107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88076645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9726045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11923355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018715022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018591208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26634467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250264301","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2136","title":"Strange bedfellows","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Nothing; Framing (construction); Charter; Political science; Law; Legislation; Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.01679811731214948,"score_gpt":0.24698094369839,"score_spread":0.23018282638624052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250264301","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006540532,0.0070163943,0.0023167452,0.740212,0.028375514,0.000032793305,0.00026014194,0.00023176988,0.21501409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14661132,0.00421956,0.0016434392,0.47164944,0.008164527,0.000055967455,0.00018880985,0.00045738745,0.36700964],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99572057,0.0014546812,0.00011671131,0.0006516861,0.0011794756,0.0008769458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99470794,0.0012960036,0.0002759485,0.0006494046,0.0015798127,0.0014909045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044227056,0.00065231026,0.0006255443,0.00083540543,0.01750882,0.0066728275,0.0014706062,0.0065585026,0.042643324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018931512,0.00035327487,0.0005895672,0.00066625484,0.015724463,0.009318611,0.005366665,0.016258582,0.011149858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031629468,0.000017211361,0.0005299307,0.000033605076,0.0000076212486,0.0008029341,0.0064456654,0.00005341601,0.00018043676,0.21691218,0.7569795,0.018005721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004044298,0.00000802491,0.00015999314,0.000077773984,0.0000024355522,0.00043022927,0.006147643,0.000051184354,0.00008502432,0.02574409,0.96727455,0.000014953709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033617277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0580349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042643324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056272657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053091045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1426562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250397760","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.246216","title":"Clarke, Rt Rev. Barry Bryan, (born 10 Oct. 1952), Bishop of Montreal, 2004–15","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Art","score_opus":0.038168024177992456,"score_gpt":0.3213080201447223,"score_spread":0.28313999596672984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250397760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017236591,0.1955624,0.00082333374,0.12506792,0.009851996,0.00011905741,0.0038070313,0.0002535968,0.66279095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008326139,0.01854477,0.00016998214,0.009342931,0.0005019349,0.000060922102,0.00030232363,0.00011788689,0.9626331],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993062,0.00011047624,0.000027242339,0.00013291964,0.00023172554,0.00019135847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994392,0.00012588198,0.000030489422,0.000028724062,0.0002778823,0.00009782367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087767263,0.000961861,0.00039936515,0.0011744144,0.010910012,0.0043777595,0.0016678316,0.004852538,0.11013033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031395182,0.00089597364,0.00041480124,0.0020118007,0.0019772763,0.0028688414,0.0017685461,0.0046235914,0.028020902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000093498265,0.000004710148,0.000101532314,0.00004118014,0.0000015501729,0.000045619963,0.0003199309,0.000029431045,0.000029091825,0.018784981,0.97354263,0.0070899166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023578827,0.0000016269103,0.00047491476,0.00009168563,0.00000137487,0.000016676871,0.0002333849,0.000009793632,0.000042302538,0.00106004,0.99805933,0.0000063322113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7369432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8740365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2630568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01748934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016531432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.529212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250566945","doi":"10.3138/9781487519117-003","title":"2 The Future of Constitutional Change in Canada: Examining Our Legal, Political, and Jurisprudential Straitjacket","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04240523165263207,"score_gpt":0.2630835621316267,"score_spread":0.22067833047899463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250566945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045033213,0.030738646,0.0023327116,0.2405918,0.0010448408,0.000087281864,0.0007046403,0.000105083505,0.6793618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78970677,0.016880538,0.003001745,0.025426352,0.00033059905,0.00008010395,0.00025516265,0.00016893812,0.16414973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927515,0.00093897065,0.00008645019,0.00050144334,0.0022072007,0.003514469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941854,0.001725496,0.00020753822,0.00020011856,0.0023079913,0.00137354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003438702,0.0005439262,0.00066396175,0.0042109704,0.039971754,0.024612602,0.003123659,0.0071309865,0.013036869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011520165,0.0005380787,0.00059308857,0.009189164,0.030208342,0.0053089308,0.0038675661,0.0077553494,0.00067355053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010001969,0.000011912367,0.0011597393,0.00004124359,0.0000056920517,0.000102848775,0.009875988,0.00042341452,0.00006272593,0.92916054,0.045481626,0.013664131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002055464,0.000013319661,0.010392817,0.00051028567,0.000033384928,0.00009907573,0.03471179,0.0016366192,0.00024469057,0.18474175,0.7674783,0.000117505755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99761826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26033315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26033315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.47467858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8579087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251419118","doi":"10.23943/princeton/9780691166483.003.0009","title":"Polygamy, Monogamy, and Marriage Justice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Princeton University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decriminalization; Supreme court; Variety (cybernetics); Economic Justice; Plural; Law; Criminology; Normative; Political science; Criminal justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.07965268196554509,"score_gpt":0.2816403960977065,"score_spread":0.20198771413216143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251419118","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05756688,0.07949868,0.0019760835,0.021358185,0.0005195724,0.000027355845,0.000026312651,0.000016648664,0.8390103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8269469,0.030442316,0.0010282312,0.0057101655,0.00052886124,0.00004476244,0.000024534955,0.000013648937,0.13526057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953103,0.00020773606,0.000008880601,0.000037610953,0.0001064198,0.00010826971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998354,0.00009325748,0.000014166147,0.000009843017,0.000016196665,0.000031077063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005377421,0.00019876669,0.00019563496,0.0005579123,0.0039721774,0.0027520745,0.0004273861,0.0010083008,0.0061907656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007139698,0.0001013456,0.00009805311,0.0007683662,0.012305445,0.0015857213,0.002269825,0.0015383126,0.00041808808],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025240802,0.000010837248,0.00029209314,0.000024370673,0.0000011059042,0.000064951964,0.0043898313,0.00003371901,0.000050042065,0.97787195,0.0030474735,0.0142110875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006712584,0.000034379595,0.0044315867,0.00030710592,0.0000054195866,0.00029331542,0.011698884,0.00014497738,0.00016788329,0.612868,0.37003115,0.000010556631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020916373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050537292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020916373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028775258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003622284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04158926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251449089","doi":"10.1353/utq.0.0322","title":"Engendering Legitimacy: Law, Property, and Early Eighteenth-Century Fiction (review)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Property (philosophy); Legal fiction; Law; Property law; Ideology; Real property; Sociology; History; Property rights; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.017497434047560108,"score_gpt":0.24257255574377906,"score_spread":0.22507512169621896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251449089","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006438762,0.99757475,0.0000084254725,0.0012196072,0.0003562364,0.0000016966254,0.000004820756,0.0000012899445,0.0007687739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012500915,0.99608314,0.0000321349,0.0011326391,0.00076677307,0.0000061318947,0.00001643682,0.0000017199234,0.0007108986],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993592,0.00021717894,0.00008181648,0.00006099185,0.00022613144,0.00005474563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954668,0.0031634793,0.0004824565,0.00004674147,0.00068842754,0.00015200218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096969283,0.00058282586,0.0010095976,0.0044494504,0.0008205073,0.0041691833,0.00078180106,0.0027200966,0.010466967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005190983,0.00035722138,0.00044198713,0.0054042465,0.0023427657,0.00455106,0.0011880168,0.0023679787,0.0022889443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044832617,0.000048020232,0.0004490213,0.038241774,0.000101387544,0.00029424543,0.0018449215,0.00009838013,0.00017884508,0.008126761,0.25762066,0.6929511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016407865,0.00004746727,0.003025864,0.054196667,0.00007956507,0.0011198041,0.0016113066,0.000028385417,0.00007987169,0.0020988593,0.93766415,0.000031681746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047512115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0110340435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010466967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013952717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028801798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035015464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251474052","doi":"10.1093/obo/9780195399301-0399","title":"Anna Maria van Schurman","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Renaissance and Reformation","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Miracle; Sculpture; Painting; Kingdom; Art; Classics; Publishing; Art history; History; Literature; Humanities; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03601918876382249,"score_gpt":0.31182156177153586,"score_spread":0.2758023730077134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251474052","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033281134,0.09233896,0.00286624,0.15312845,0.044797793,0.000060875715,0.00066780736,0.0005450537,0.7022668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042253364,0.02286754,0.0011496046,0.0149331,0.0055012982,0.00008983488,0.00028005172,0.00053637405,0.91238886],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985373,0.00035240068,0.000047090605,0.00038437074,0.00053060916,0.00014812381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992743,0.00022848713,0.00006855784,0.00004504021,0.00022517872,0.00015843438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000919664,0.000851392,0.0003554698,0.00093418703,0.0033412839,0.0043913755,0.0007379705,0.0018647059,0.0841135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049969144,0.0003463525,0.00026457364,0.0003611534,0.0015392613,0.0025346219,0.0022007662,0.0036517284,0.06116095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024818795,0.0000123708705,0.00015090425,0.00012488409,0.00000478641,0.00015889005,0.0010376627,0.000098737466,0.0002631734,0.072703876,0.86853284,0.05688713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.216975e-7,0.0000015878508,0.00003991653,0.000059647056,5.334809e-7,0.00006886377,0.000085379615,0.000021984251,0.000071444774,0.001412274,0.99823475,0.000003085762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056798663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007867742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0841135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028753239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029039874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28138775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251700674","doi":"10.1353/cal.2001.0106","title":"Editor's Note","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Callaloo","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Repetition (rhetorical device); Quarter (Canadian coin); History; Baton rouge; Advice (programming); Classics; Art history; Computer science; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.025726408223159,"score_gpt":0.328606342510073,"score_spread":0.30287993428691395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251700674","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014037018,0.001608805,0.00020798101,0.21537197,0.7699557,0.00004718599,0.00024804246,0.00020100026,0.012218955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040610377,0.0030509396,0.00087930437,0.33330804,0.47794124,0.00014970149,0.00024361497,0.00035982794,0.18000631],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99445504,0.00052311044,0.0005349546,0.0010186024,0.0029550665,0.0005131559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97347564,0.0051560267,0.0010982725,0.0011519965,0.016510602,0.0026074634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042798016,0.0015207076,0.0016140031,0.0014872723,0.003919017,0.0061169453,0.0037690373,0.009624272,0.053953547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049276166,0.0006388814,0.0014147304,0.0010796362,0.0016289791,0.0037924428,0.0020497045,0.013935541,0.04303081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063937614,0.0000030291035,0.000022610919,0.000023501301,0.0000012315538,0.00003772573,0.000015691608,0.000005050377,0.000021429669,0.00024431324,0.99718225,0.0024368647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005302296,0.000006893971,0.00014554737,0.00008360777,0.0000032970586,0.00010494486,0.00006498779,0.000033685174,0.000082284234,0.00026142644,0.999198,0.000010012176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049750274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012844162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053953547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026216356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006958765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18049258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251764200","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.1.93","title":"Redressing the Right Wrong: The Argument from Corrective Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Indigenous; Injustice; Economic Justice; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.022258492148469238,"score_gpt":0.2682911348908973,"score_spread":0.24603264274242806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251764200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04965701,0.006332709,0.042148504,0.3856353,0.002356065,0.00015550258,0.000042488577,0.000112361115,0.5135601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9340788,0.0008772317,0.0032604537,0.041609358,0.0006439834,0.00009739874,0.00000978827,0.00007182622,0.019351117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9797283,0.010618274,0.0005531873,0.001895778,0.004145116,0.0030594058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820123,0.010767946,0.0016329809,0.0018721173,0.0023791634,0.0013355854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015284348,0.0005554831,0.0007419095,0.0012842665,0.018603876,0.009540365,0.0023089664,0.014253263,0.0027311407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031156674,0.00044588392,0.0007729966,0.000718387,0.08260097,0.012010015,0.010114469,0.016676107,0.0003592469],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009367867,0.000013318692,0.00020723761,0.000034324425,0.0000052969103,0.0001884796,0.008533329,0.00015204615,0.00007733705,0.9850798,0.0038413422,0.0018580565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045110064,0.00003814287,0.00051554444,0.00035980917,0.000022813843,0.00033315553,0.013131867,0.0007871826,0.0006319294,0.8670402,0.11704532,0.00004893215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024774611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020664658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024774611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01171022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012066768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08496404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252067742","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.bkb_1.x","title":"Book Review","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marriage and the Family","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Sociology; Library science; Media studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.021177411157072834,"score_gpt":0.3018141870081191,"score_spread":0.28063677585104624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252067742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003718879,0.1688281,0.0010186415,0.033034146,0.07300428,0.0001603004,0.0011463494,0.00047730477,0.72195905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010505713,0.042005282,0.0003858779,0.006426406,0.011353693,0.000048610174,0.0005443082,0.00011211298,0.9380731],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938285,0.00006371605,0.000023964834,0.00006312303,0.00041058118,0.00005577892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774086,0.00037687767,0.00011225561,0.00014203927,0.0011872482,0.00044068755],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068771647,0.0005788653,0.0007972152,0.0031409422,0.00096082006,0.003477102,0.0013009158,0.0018877436,0.3507697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041473247,0.00029811103,0.00037426292,0.0033434392,0.0005548064,0.0020016686,0.0013098046,0.0019126157,0.31257662],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004700875,0.000007745578,0.000019862442,0.00009471875,0.0000012455603,0.00001824198,0.000008994595,0.000017673283,0.000039473616,0.0010196975,0.94690406,0.05186352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001761268,0.000002771992,0.00006102566,0.00009907492,0.0000010781828,0.00003736359,0.000010163118,0.000006081972,0.000011124084,0.000289889,0.9994784,0.000001394365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036370351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009928634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3507697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014391306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024984896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9260482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252240964","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.287555","title":"Montreal, Bishop of, (Rt Rev. Mary Irwin-Gibson) (born 23 Oct. 1955)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.0349408320803442,"score_gpt":0.30947647849161314,"score_spread":0.27453564641126893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252240964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00081001903,0.108468994,0.000489649,0.040726498,0.009386413,0.00007722153,0.005135392,0.00036376732,0.83454204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0045963665,0.008865738,0.00011522915,0.0041700797,0.0004904331,0.000032721135,0.00027270228,0.000109329456,0.98134744],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952734,0.000050936713,0.000021497463,0.00009437322,0.00017169611,0.00013417848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961734,0.00007564758,0.000025916168,0.000023347062,0.0001786574,0.000079211626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005586636,0.00079104706,0.00042765937,0.0012924469,0.008007106,0.004258356,0.0012076062,0.00360549,0.22954391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022679185,0.0007464461,0.00047956296,0.0020840503,0.0014973639,0.0028539302,0.0018984481,0.0034710353,0.06275237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065839286,0.000002761532,0.000090872636,0.000040205374,0.0000013290208,0.000042770323,0.00017622388,0.0000146826005,0.000023614815,0.012763066,0.9784319,0.008406085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020850496,0.0000011563676,0.0005118067,0.000085816915,0.000001278823,0.000019636727,0.00012867112,0.00000498361,0.00002584729,0.0005982901,0.99861646,0.0000040381674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7086361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89309204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7086361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00867041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009165755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7679009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252359161","doi":"10.3138/9781442619005-012","title":"10. DIY 101: The Constitutional Entrenchment of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Constitutional review; Constitution","score_opus":0.02220387339202916,"score_gpt":0.2152105931672671,"score_spread":0.19300671977523792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252359161","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010145671,0.010275584,0.00084649114,0.043775223,0.0008635675,0.00005599977,0.0006048581,0.00004722116,0.9333854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34654266,0.0043796306,0.0008645563,0.020625466,0.00035520658,0.000087150744,0.00023149714,0.00012840798,0.6267854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615437,0.00040970743,0.00006301423,0.00039464695,0.0013637015,0.001614508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983176,0.0004880684,0.000058759175,0.00008825905,0.0007235726,0.00032372735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017698514,0.0005776065,0.0005348909,0.0019859474,0.023697909,0.016450575,0.002170715,0.010644056,0.022658236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006216674,0.0006893451,0.00047923008,0.0027440144,0.011347503,0.0035005447,0.0024383839,0.008758179,0.0015938794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008774494,0.0000069064113,0.00027989742,0.00001963858,0.0000037654793,0.00008714289,0.0029698005,0.00012566445,0.000056067154,0.91067725,0.08110177,0.004663151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023316175,0.0000073199526,0.0035901205,0.00028674968,0.000023538903,0.00008158722,0.0056422027,0.00040891243,0.00026260834,0.10262355,0.8869811,0.00006894441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9891643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87222946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12777054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15572964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9270445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252865071","doi":"10.1093/obo/9780195399301-0429","title":"Margaret More Roper","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Renaissance and Reformation","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Erasmus+; Humanism; Piety; Vernacular; Classics; Wife; Hymn; Theology; Philosophy; Literature; Sociology; Art; Art history; The Renaissance","score_opus":0.03234334517254744,"score_gpt":0.3015038938059766,"score_spread":0.26916054863342914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252865071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051831873,0.03436437,0.0010212065,0.16445608,0.040486228,0.00008502124,0.0006712604,0.0006096879,0.75312304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011923126,0.0057362253,0.00024599422,0.019101411,0.0019043508,0.000027100928,0.0001329096,0.00021257722,0.9607163],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943775,0.00008496495,0.000016272885,0.00016614782,0.00018424538,0.00011057439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990644,0.0000815753,0.000056958248,0.000032979842,0.0002267535,0.00053733576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006124694,0.00046978032,0.00023545796,0.00059695373,0.0030330054,0.002007433,0.00059166324,0.0015829802,0.23965394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025836455,0.0002862312,0.0001720888,0.00028028258,0.00061659917,0.001701291,0.002189397,0.0029620684,0.09984304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017392329,0.000010787922,0.000097724675,0.000042255,9.775291e-7,0.00014381853,0.00026023426,0.000011089206,0.00013389825,0.0029517484,0.9780161,0.018314106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011798192,0.000005129624,0.00015234934,0.000031722408,5.7055377e-7,0.00015996708,0.00014576744,0.000005139878,0.00004596081,0.00014274438,0.9993069,0.0000024308858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063888533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015174797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23965394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016162036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001747123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8017223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253171590","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0001","title":"Introduction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Indigenous; Political science; Democracy; Law; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.03929021520453922,"score_gpt":0.2556821823605354,"score_spread":0.21639196715599618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253171590","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045955094,0.0056197178,0.001506517,0.007266178,0.004021695,0.00012526,0.0039815754,0.0004937159,0.97652584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0065331473,0.0070207645,0.0015079957,0.0026476248,0.000867545,0.00007855763,0.004058307,0.00028681167,0.9769992],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998517,0.00008754769,0.000038157716,0.0002309577,0.00087132264,0.00025501446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982115,0.000089206944,0.000031371823,0.00011134429,0.0013352481,0.00022127644],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069628574,0.0008652836,0.0005627466,0.0023237572,0.0051430645,0.0074150804,0.0019765452,0.0022491587,0.39105782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026486975,0.00034087052,0.0005013066,0.0029841764,0.0015634022,0.0024686605,0.0020841495,0.0023186766,0.14674081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012109183,0.000014675872,0.00018022518,0.0001888171,0.0000018926075,0.00006023957,0.0005184858,0.0001283816,0.00021730394,0.05316015,0.8691815,0.07633628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.2811396e-7,0.0000017827606,0.00012581889,0.00008303426,6.101007e-7,0.00001522135,0.00011025626,0.000009167107,0.000022197048,0.00094558584,0.99868304,0.00000273729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41940716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4416712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41940716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016216155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021406243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8685821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253535235","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.18712","title":"Souliere v. Casino Niagara2014 CarswellOnt 3908, 2014 OnSC 1915, 239 A.C.W.S. (3d) 266 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, March 25, 2014)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Humanities; Law; Art","score_opus":0.024040022461297772,"score_gpt":0.2767443486285625,"score_spread":0.25270432616726474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253535235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0104926415,0.0049871774,0.00044088924,0.031650785,0.0007504837,0.00013215607,0.0017477939,0.00012222228,0.9496758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07562833,0.0025008575,0.0007317814,0.03143654,0.00019233317,0.00019967697,0.0007857085,0.00007289792,0.88845176],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985055,0.00009682442,0.000037373455,0.00018756716,0.0007152951,0.00045755666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888617,0.00027783585,0.00004891473,0.000049243165,0.00056168454,0.0001761672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010853688,0.0005276104,0.0002836039,0.00088444917,0.016794251,0.004508288,0.0013474919,0.0056186696,0.038051024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043876283,0.00057951943,0.00039072733,0.00080882706,0.0014375686,0.0015159884,0.0012922894,0.004493996,0.006454142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072984694,0.000039306335,0.0030303854,0.00009862613,0.000010093354,0.0003866572,0.0017342676,0.000091057285,0.0005155845,0.09723828,0.88264185,0.01414088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018858562,0.00001618689,0.0077207326,0.00015477763,0.000021162929,0.00011977342,0.0008819019,0.00018595347,0.0006176306,0.0025817945,0.9876472,0.000034151442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8073767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9627127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8073767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016864652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023138825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38751537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253849760","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u7750","title":"Blackwell, Rt Rev. Douglas Charles, (3 June 1938–25 May 2022), an Area (formerly Suffragan) Bishop of Toronto (Area Bishop of Trent-Durham), 1988–2003","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Cartography; Geography","score_opus":0.04185462168732683,"score_gpt":0.3173149805130908,"score_spread":0.275460358825764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253849760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012112943,0.03872893,0.00050920487,0.029422268,0.00856148,0.000088113666,0.01168735,0.00050308264,0.9092883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012597592,0.0045837504,0.00007446688,0.0010865895,0.0001576518,0.000017478285,0.00052960514,0.00009118845,0.9921995],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996344,0.000040532104,0.000024561185,0.000057572473,0.00016809528,0.00007481932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992021,0.00012305721,0.000048595142,0.00004049507,0.00045785226,0.00012794878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007602847,0.000743605,0.00041139114,0.0012258722,0.0034945786,0.0035309587,0.000900977,0.0027704267,0.28732023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021329557,0.0005724241,0.00023869937,0.0017644656,0.00060018076,0.0022722192,0.0014017639,0.0024043475,0.1442729],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064297296,0.0000024802555,0.000043656244,0.000038725047,4.375661e-7,0.000028012964,0.0001247785,0.000013100046,0.000016027385,0.001959156,0.98924303,0.008524205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013063801,0.0000012471036,0.0003673114,0.00008943301,4.9815804e-7,0.000011158053,0.00016142153,0.000007170183,0.00001775648,0.00023892464,0.9991019,0.0000020275374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1722023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.492708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28732023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037168304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006094849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96118194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253864082","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u213941","title":"McPhillips, Captain Hon. Albert Edward; Hon. Mr Justice McPhillips, (21 March 1861–24 Jan. 1938), KC; FRES; one of His Majesty’s Justices of the Court of Appeal, British Columbia, since 1913; late President of the Council in the Government of the Province of British Columbia; Attorney-General, 1903; first elected to Provincial Parliament, 1898","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Appeal; Economic Justice; Art; Law; Cartography; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.025328060834262117,"score_gpt":0.245534927785302,"score_spread":0.2202068669510399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253864082","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028254667,0.028788716,0.00028480194,0.08527643,0.013925795,0.00012913859,0.0028796748,0.0002757385,0.86561424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005098679,0.0031188964,0.00007630326,0.0021604788,0.00046944228,0.000014612607,0.00017154652,0.000057595404,0.9888325],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960893,0.000030231071,0.000019836198,0.000066648645,0.00015985908,0.00011454146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990721,0.000105649895,0.000053587195,0.000022210648,0.0005411816,0.00020521414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042280828,0.0005989173,0.0003274463,0.0010714817,0.008463288,0.0033725377,0.0007522886,0.0018487859,0.19873722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018906982,0.00050013396,0.00015924167,0.0014545677,0.000974488,0.0014303091,0.0010146792,0.0030351183,0.07800434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004682441,0.0000017982176,0.000102946826,0.000018379573,3.1365795e-7,0.000029487674,0.00022819047,0.000004190578,0.000023043036,0.0007740454,0.9935582,0.0052545993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010446632,0.0000016043892,0.0008768779,0.00003377423,5.7826406e-7,0.000031151456,0.0003996001,0.0000042724505,0.000036526355,0.00008172699,0.99852896,0.000003866395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50341326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79874593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49658674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009281508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052921744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254068021","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.33891","title":"Morgan, Most Rev. Thomas Oliver, (born 20 Jan. 1941), Archbishop of Saskatoon and Metropolitan of the Ecclesiastical Province of Rupert’s Land, 2000–03; Interim Rector and Dean, St John’s Cathedral, Saskatoon, 2006–07 and 2011–12","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Archbishop; Metropolitan area; Interim; History; Classics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.030488918802679517,"score_gpt":0.2942868236882268,"score_spread":0.2637979048855473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254068021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032472326,0.18112104,0.0009668049,0.1717738,0.016281614,0.00014945897,0.009825677,0.0003816894,0.6162527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018459495,0.049364205,0.0005410007,0.029484754,0.0012119093,0.00016867138,0.0011372351,0.00026804113,0.89936465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987312,0.00022892685,0.00009174787,0.00014329757,0.0005176693,0.0002871627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987337,0.00023871704,0.000095273645,0.000052612893,0.000730557,0.00014919224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011845817,0.0011641579,0.00047957143,0.0021003387,0.008160242,0.005149488,0.0016140676,0.0044415873,0.05377806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035938928,0.00083853735,0.00035916813,0.004942038,0.0027652753,0.004512146,0.0021091427,0.0056743696,0.025843635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064510928,0.0000026176867,0.00009644251,0.000050022267,0.0000012422983,0.000027215992,0.0007601767,0.000015118956,0.000018858926,0.007214296,0.9872471,0.0045604515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032558182,0.000001585038,0.0010332101,0.00017878838,0.0000025183283,0.000019848161,0.0017617497,0.000006229713,0.000042466487,0.001294785,0.99564373,0.000011946053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7264131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8790277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27358693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014829154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026119644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55039626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254174589","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14712","title":"Chippewas of Mnjikaning First Nation v. Ontario, <i>[2010] O.J. No. 2360 (Can.)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Political science; Volume (thermodynamics); Humanities; Library science; Media studies; Law; Art; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Physics","score_opus":0.03524059886939603,"score_gpt":0.25720224268264835,"score_spread":0.2219616438132523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254174589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033225913,0.0059893187,0.0007100005,0.077656314,0.0011714573,0.00020614247,0.0028770766,0.00011173034,0.87805206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15329374,0.0037499866,0.0006038879,0.054804318,0.00019734833,0.00014223525,0.0007260715,0.000058181322,0.7864243],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875677,0.000071434704,0.000029427418,0.000099946454,0.0005391424,0.00050332875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987914,0.0002820918,0.00005446557,0.000038783204,0.00059902045,0.00023428645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010164052,0.00041787646,0.00027325103,0.000719473,0.017765531,0.005000726,0.0013085123,0.0068777655,0.018014101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034639386,0.0005594245,0.00041026302,0.0009421949,0.0021661527,0.0014528228,0.000972185,0.0034813061,0.0018117583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006795938,0.00003669873,0.008286007,0.00014737691,0.000019931833,0.0007875754,0.004944657,0.0001286921,0.0008331589,0.10481059,0.86953557,0.0104017425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024930772,0.00002583069,0.029431997,0.0002266048,0.000058904112,0.00014388666,0.004898108,0.00025574947,0.00096814305,0.0038308643,0.96007377,0.00006119278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9594901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99316084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04050988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02740736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0500266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19885528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254291686","doi":"10.1163/1877-5888_rpp_sim_02729","title":"Canadian Conference of Bishops","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Religion Past and Present","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bishops; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.03397561908119253,"score_gpt":0.30441610412947,"score_spread":0.2704404850482775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254291686","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002470024,0.00018662542,0.000060487317,0.00012960075,0.000075631506,0.000019759143,0.995501,0.00020566539,0.0035741776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007802132,0.00017591541,0.00025257276,0.00005653716,0.000020193042,0.00006674105,0.99275804,0.00007482575,0.0058150333],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847585,0.00016707499,0.00013688407,0.00031039026,0.00056853326,0.0003412727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950317,0.00062278286,0.00029863633,0.0008580396,0.0023839867,0.0008048668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001252149,0.0020876294,0.0016135151,0.009078849,0.0024798599,0.003984665,0.002699924,0.0015465793,0.10859042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008120145,0.0008840342,0.0012103833,0.013091476,0.0006654397,0.0009966125,0.0026269061,0.0022829704,0.091751024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022044553,0.0000055972423,0.00052495254,0.00011680824,0.000008193908,0.000008272851,0.000012804264,0.00008020927,0.000016743094,0.00031122196,0.9967823,0.0021108368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006163672,0.0000036147158,0.005829457,0.00017474074,0.000013173372,0.000017377712,0.00011763277,0.00022920223,0.00009517592,0.00048535946,0.9929557,0.000016934604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56368756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7362245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43631244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005113836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017208261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8777639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254532483","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198264682.001.0001","title":"A Question of Autonomy?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Tort; Criminal law; Law; Childbirth; Intervention (counseling); Autonomy; Medicine; Political science; Psychology; Liability; Nursing; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.0110051208663158,"score_gpt":0.21493549200847958,"score_spread":0.20393037114216378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254532483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038974471,0.013973263,0.001160572,0.04740929,0.0010752903,0.000009032865,0.00002422575,0.000013747675,0.9324371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5469202,0.012949398,0.0008368188,0.023030313,0.0018403616,0.000052920157,0.00007210146,0.000069652844,0.41422826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985245,0.0006895714,0.000025249778,0.00015020964,0.00040883152,0.00020166243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991646,0.00043739539,0.000040514562,0.000082022074,0.000141825,0.00013364483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012264935,0.0002759242,0.00028975419,0.0004887352,0.004576001,0.0046494617,0.0006991666,0.0016131157,0.0067025805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025369148,0.00013298054,0.00019667615,0.00043589037,0.027913304,0.005837544,0.0021425223,0.0044228714,0.0011702385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022066145,0.0000035707646,0.000040246956,0.000008363219,4.1017393e-7,0.0000308933,0.004890281,0.000019799621,0.000019427645,0.97466373,0.017131193,0.0031898352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046102837,0.000008053194,0.0003457253,0.00019422545,0.0000015265705,0.00010811089,0.0070305443,0.000099027966,0.000057116067,0.35878766,0.63335794,0.000005404663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0344958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029596502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0344958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006074939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004201304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068590045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254583539","doi":"10.7202/1027314ar","title":"Gérald-A. Beaudoin, La Constitution du Canada, 3 édition, La Collection Bleue, Série Traités, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2004, 1522 pages, ISBN 2-89127-638-8 Henri Brun, Chartes des droits de la personne. Législation, Jurisprudence et Doctrine, 16 édition, Collection Alter Ego, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2003, 1303 pages, ISBN 2-89127-611-6 Jacques Deslauriers, Loi sur la faillite et l’insolvabilité, 4 édition, Collection Alter Ego, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2004, 1100 pages, ISBN 2-89127-643-4 Rachel Grondin, Les infractions contre la personne et contre les biens, 5 édition, Collection Bleue, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2003, 194 pages, ISBN 2-89127-613-2","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art history; Art","score_opus":0.014230309132217362,"score_gpt":0.24826958673647756,"score_spread":0.2340392776042602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254583539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011101579,0.46760166,0.0013129505,0.03991533,0.0052353456,0.00011280163,0.0040902505,0.00043431352,0.48018715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015245676,0.20267367,0.0023790787,0.010150629,0.001022025,0.00013001393,0.0019203612,0.0004102715,0.7660684],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974383,0.00017358194,0.00007689345,0.00022740405,0.0017373769,0.0003462838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871886,0.00018925402,0.000069297676,0.0000581566,0.00081839686,0.0001461056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011104441,0.001760375,0.0007803652,0.0034074814,0.007468323,0.00672735,0.0022235096,0.003829335,0.067655705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029152315,0.0008369396,0.000588751,0.008236079,0.0041347495,0.0034762959,0.0015323296,0.004040577,0.0208434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010189246,0.000008725828,0.00018170872,0.00016138142,0.0000054861493,0.00003679408,0.00061314146,0.000085701344,0.000099517936,0.022239937,0.9501052,0.02645223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031328232,0.0000019939757,0.0009990385,0.00023148222,0.000004052868,0.00003055182,0.00027628147,0.000023983464,0.000045852732,0.0019524805,0.9964173,0.000013752843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9705356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9854354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06768228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06768228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.070940465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49107164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255530224","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.27277","title":"Mercer, Rev. Mgr Robert William Stanley, (born 10 Jan. 1935), Diocesan Bishop, Anglican Catholic Church of Canada, 1989–2005 (Assistant Bishop, 1988–89)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Theology; Gerontology; Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026232119137664257,"score_gpt":0.2966238239852705,"score_spread":0.2703917048476062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255530224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023043558,0.18051706,0.00039409485,0.16913192,0.011687581,0.00008708565,0.0047409646,0.00031480778,0.6308222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007497448,0.024728596,0.00017609463,0.022541994,0.0012761254,0.00008684458,0.00050126534,0.00012490124,0.9430668],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999474,0.00007414521,0.000026929067,0.00009164106,0.00021666061,0.00011676488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994885,0.00013913798,0.000038702306,0.000025947595,0.00022840101,0.00007928477],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008709174,0.00074736855,0.00042769054,0.0011182054,0.006206937,0.0030650613,0.0012481516,0.004546265,0.105298646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028492701,0.0005817378,0.00029151427,0.0014576473,0.0009357205,0.0030951058,0.0018719506,0.00398909,0.046997007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051088055,0.0000042609367,0.00007358326,0.000030073888,7.134715e-7,0.000022109063,0.00019596188,0.000009219779,0.000015405085,0.006487596,0.98716146,0.005994578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025007892,0.0000018683465,0.0006940664,0.00013174803,0.0000012358606,0.000015628175,0.0002586512,0.0000072606545,0.000026983578,0.0010433088,0.9978125,0.000004361113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18989642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40165526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89470136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003833949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049463427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3775822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256397086","doi":"10.1177/0067205x1304100106","title":"Considering Canadian Approaches to Equality in the Context of Constitutional Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Project commissioning; Political science; Sociology; Geography; Media studies; Publishing; Ethnology; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.16254608544722277,"score_gpt":0.33825860967231586,"score_spread":0.1757125242250931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256397086","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05139401,0.0636121,0.0010190099,0.5155899,0.004479932,0.0001760384,0.0006767825,0.00005798867,0.3629943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7489168,0.035475496,0.0031560655,0.14044549,0.002015509,0.00022524234,0.0003116822,0.000104258484,0.06934951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9626386,0.006066817,0.0011298879,0.0023679198,0.010394369,0.01740243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9589502,0.014183755,0.0010594045,0.0011389046,0.019804997,0.004862727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026550287,0.0007075628,0.0016704807,0.009177238,0.047932003,0.028434109,0.0077238316,0.018553397,0.008540688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03977298,0.00089589134,0.0015049386,0.012401567,0.029123846,0.0071896,0.006450376,0.017887983,0.00038226641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054194046,0.00004512365,0.0020113739,0.00035820692,0.000062456485,0.0003854225,0.023638153,0.0004820415,0.0002340157,0.87448215,0.07683612,0.02141083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010117859,0.00005794593,0.023924056,0.0025016342,0.00038518547,0.00021541887,0.073967144,0.00067858456,0.00065329584,0.094397955,0.8027202,0.00039744895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25776795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25776795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5328707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86088395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256695152","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.18812","title":"Lake Louise Limited Partnership v. Canad Corp. of Manitoba Ltd. <i>[2014] M.J. No. 171, 2014 MBCA 61, 2014 MB.C. Lexis 172 (Manitoba Court of Appeal, June 13, 2014)</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Lexis; General partnership; Political science; Download; Library science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03139974770948781,"score_gpt":0.2670107917707297,"score_spread":0.23561104406124192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256695152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013970038,0.0055106175,0.0008427727,0.039330065,0.0007354623,0.00022000843,0.0024859246,0.00026173185,0.93664336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0599892,0.002614755,0.0006777057,0.03686077,0.000090345115,0.00020322844,0.0007525163,0.00006081354,0.89875066],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987099,0.00012889552,0.000035297002,0.00011175848,0.0005748164,0.00043944214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794763,0.0003764056,0.00009124013,0.000051427185,0.0012660598,0.00026725695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001279547,0.0006645179,0.00025290332,0.0015225948,0.012845728,0.0052484153,0.0016970332,0.004534984,0.04263556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028993231,0.0010125104,0.00050634914,0.0018931157,0.0015987083,0.001921376,0.0011532848,0.0032642053,0.008476915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068079666,0.00006555941,0.0064366325,0.00019445502,0.000025874153,0.00046826198,0.0016423981,0.00015082124,0.0006696665,0.08540078,0.88847524,0.01640225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049623566,0.000047423982,0.014153119,0.0003915133,0.0000541077,0.00017691845,0.002779798,0.00040391236,0.0010680992,0.0029234102,0.97789335,0.000058681286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85576296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96957546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85576296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016280591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040339727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29017293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281967755","doi":"10.21991/cf29445","title":"The Paradox of Political Questions in Canadian Aboriginal Law: Why Dickson v Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation Requires Reconsideration of the Political Questions Doctrine in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Doctrine; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.022137118956822677,"score_gpt":0.2900613215639113,"score_spread":0.2679242026070886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281967755","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09898303,0.0060240263,0.001069037,0.6283817,0.00086145976,0.000063545114,0.00025236382,0.000046080702,0.26431873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.842302,0.0028058875,0.0013932127,0.09462633,0.00026732023,0.000050726212,0.00007268557,0.00010026,0.05838165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927577,0.0011986475,0.00016497185,0.0006641445,0.0021522534,0.0030622405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859505,0.005381879,0.00045561802,0.00029358253,0.0052319276,0.0026864745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008310311,0.00037916453,0.0005402301,0.0015656167,0.050172254,0.017876102,0.0037218041,0.0123680895,0.009598127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020685894,0.0006456797,0.0005853198,0.0029156765,0.025874335,0.005392876,0.003950503,0.013941268,0.00042184928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038276416,0.00003276154,0.0030738926,0.00009502694,0.000019981362,0.00034650686,0.040713873,0.00041513445,0.00027604523,0.84656674,0.09815008,0.010271561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012172666,0.000032205575,0.02056187,0.0006821387,0.00012886802,0.00022923571,0.16005927,0.0018864402,0.00089534745,0.16806805,0.646979,0.0003558372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99754936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99886227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18547106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18547106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34814858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94473815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283331183","doi":"10.3138/utq.91.2.01","title":"Law as a Mediating Institution of History: The Approach and Strategy of Harold Innis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Law; Civilization; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Legal history; Environmental ethics; Political science; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024044792620234574,"score_gpt":0.2321423338144626,"score_spread":0.20809754119422802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283331183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04218378,0.09328822,0.02101032,0.1758638,0.0023447003,0.00012389808,0.00007847626,0.000116669195,0.66499007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8614762,0.03440139,0.008529593,0.015608884,0.0018143078,0.00021519604,0.000042903273,0.0001692016,0.07774227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968923,0.001729234,0.000055091106,0.00035247466,0.00057850144,0.00039240398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964579,0.0025652752,0.000168861,0.00014587636,0.00027584672,0.00038623487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004631762,0.00074091606,0.00078568165,0.0037246235,0.01246423,0.016484309,0.0028860662,0.004523527,0.0027467704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004626533,0.0003924359,0.0002628205,0.002224897,0.059069954,0.013510772,0.0063208994,0.006274536,0.0006389119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051540637,0.000009062952,0.00013884087,0.000023988256,0.0000017067442,0.00014865054,0.020721192,0.00007099742,0.00005176885,0.971722,0.0037040778,0.0034025894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005774531,0.000014960462,0.00032108367,0.00056732795,0.0000073271494,0.0003091833,0.03670603,0.0005463479,0.0003567431,0.6231162,0.33801863,0.0000305258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031876378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037355375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031876378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017235603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007841805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12505364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284692863","doi":"10.3390/rel13070628","title":"Inspiring Intergenerational Relationships: Aging and the New Testament from One Historian’s Perspective","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religions","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Meaning (existential); New Testament; Storytelling; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Nature versus nurture; Old Testament; Grandparent; Diversity (politics); Power (physics); Reading (process); Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Narrative; Aesthetics; Psychology; Epistemology; Literature; Theology; Philosophy; Linguistics; History; Developmental psychology; Art; Anthropology","score_opus":0.053595826260462456,"score_gpt":0.3052803069414638,"score_spread":0.25168448068100135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284692863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2474346,0.10889334,0.0078229755,0.24933745,0.007939871,0.000060796017,0.0000837435,0.00010718355,0.37832007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95203006,0.0154221635,0.0011373847,0.007536357,0.0024968816,0.000031303185,0.000018597819,0.00004397163,0.02128331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984497,0.001083617,0.000038959,0.0000998558,0.00015258622,0.00017534869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969452,0.0020261675,0.00033944522,0.00017598711,0.00018726729,0.0003259145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034026334,0.00039639283,0.00026453176,0.001200914,0.0070992713,0.006381726,0.00092652434,0.0020991587,0.0023834647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039311945,0.0001629774,0.00014625322,0.0010545413,0.036640923,0.0077421837,0.00420857,0.005493183,0.00021517026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022175918,0.000021393675,0.0006612388,0.0001109731,0.0000040593472,0.0005363012,0.44901147,0.00008735685,0.00019898896,0.5293997,0.0087175425,0.011228804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000100821,0.00006865465,0.0017932034,0.0006860772,0.000010299008,0.0009728307,0.22006816,0.00022187518,0.0004917861,0.12688144,0.6487645,0.000031156032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033617222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005862689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070992713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003895759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020839334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028265834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285070302","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4124656","title":"Legislating Emotion, Reading Grief: Bereavement Leave for Miscarriage and Stillbirth in New Zealand Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Miscarriage; Grief; Reading (process); Psychology; Law; Psychoanalysis; Political science; Developmental psychology; Psychotherapist; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.01787594092474581,"score_gpt":0.2881690528571011,"score_spread":0.2702931119323553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285070302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64720875,0.002437738,0.0028748126,0.21140671,0.0006304354,0.00014396466,0.000100574856,0.000041855525,0.13515514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97847074,0.00063815125,0.0008392437,0.006759439,0.00009178293,0.000058937196,0.000027016735,0.000026298283,0.013088251],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957867,0.0018192529,0.00020437552,0.0003396657,0.0006903064,0.001159673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865014,0.007679158,0.001895969,0.0003600196,0.0013030308,0.002260425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070798974,0.00017118051,0.00026254,0.000738695,0.010324035,0.0061680507,0.0013277308,0.004515493,0.00716519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032335788,0.00041400758,0.00026538587,0.00062867947,0.011502287,0.0045589237,0.0036705486,0.010766716,0.00044817035],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014009773,0.00050770503,0.042626522,0.00020370224,0.000023265331,0.0018316424,0.72722524,0.00039084294,0.0014837693,0.13301067,0.029838486,0.06271803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000670472,0.00014459672,0.105526894,0.00067503855,0.000048410377,0.0003920244,0.73492086,0.00088564574,0.00074504927,0.03229738,0.12416869,0.00012837675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4481928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67175925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4481928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01633334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02938485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89116806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285232348","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4140735","title":"Six Examples Applying the Meta-Principle Linguistic Method: Lessons for Indigenous Law Implementation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Ratification; Normative; Linguistics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.08940911779542297,"score_gpt":0.42348464015266085,"score_spread":0.33407552235723786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285232348","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0656581,0.019450782,0.7098182,0.06170386,0.0019774085,0.0042561796,0.0010778733,0.0015201644,0.1345374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2522618,0.0063769715,0.72288096,0.003012812,0.0002635201,0.0036913939,0.00055923895,0.0005838812,0.010369351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.908351,0.082415,0.0024737131,0.0012602649,0.004613565,0.00088643946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8126984,0.16246663,0.002203439,0.010813101,0.010654108,0.0011642341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07595846,0.0010460045,0.0016433203,0.006126569,0.0068517914,0.0075658583,0.0061978432,0.0034789944,0.011017566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15642746,0.0008766096,0.0019814577,0.008954735,0.007814384,0.011448655,0.0066292984,0.0049080504,0.001287915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050808926,0.0004661991,0.0035952502,0.0102959,0.0006555609,0.0008110669,0.08290242,0.0030562175,0.0008508164,0.5731311,0.030635385,0.29309198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043606022,0.0003915751,0.004668254,0.015987203,0.0009432308,0.0006648522,0.053858165,0.012754587,0.0034360292,0.7045433,0.20209502,0.0002217564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005756523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019660296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07595846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063749924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008457111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40171152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285307532","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4130532","title":"Resurrecting 'She Asked for It': The Rough Sex Defence in Canadian Courts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of British Columbia; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Forensic engineering; Law; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.02495765694093481,"score_gpt":0.31593111700258303,"score_spread":0.2909734600616482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285307532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66946065,0.0038377838,0.000612987,0.12052414,0.000690644,0.00010158641,0.00024140363,0.000032526863,0.20449826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95288014,0.0009055329,0.00022344629,0.010433734,0.00004996094,0.000023620907,0.000040840136,0.00003813427,0.035404537],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880973,0.0022736345,0.00020385822,0.00078416313,0.0027710018,0.0058699576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987605,0.004252538,0.00075853866,0.00034909733,0.003772557,0.0032622241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008279989,0.00046265824,0.0007599149,0.0022146357,0.07233833,0.014319056,0.0038863793,0.011917526,0.014033825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030752424,0.0008237455,0.0005590818,0.003668197,0.021932835,0.0047087944,0.006856358,0.0159259,0.0006572413],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016328935,0.00011771064,0.023969198,0.000121322504,0.000038557442,0.0015885725,0.6421491,0.00033224793,0.000545887,0.2293962,0.06574208,0.035835933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037125003,0.00005296158,0.047157038,0.00049245136,0.000078134246,0.00043791803,0.7243121,0.00039776156,0.00039130362,0.011267073,0.21515465,0.0002213999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9958526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99846965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15417089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15417089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22241376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9810419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285545023","doi":"10.7202/1088370ar","title":"La tutelle supplétive : un exemple de la nécessaire adaptabilité du principe de l’indisponibilité de l’autorité parentale en droit civil québécois","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01039045765980447,"score_gpt":0.25750475849983834,"score_spread":0.24711430084003386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285545023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45785525,0.0022850996,0.013483049,0.050837334,0.0005506349,0.0001817174,0.00034813726,0.0001318266,0.47432703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93284595,0.00041048543,0.002001952,0.0029680617,0.000047419988,0.00006351065,0.000058672525,0.000046965022,0.06155705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961041,0.0011635539,0.00008904221,0.00053649617,0.0008162535,0.0012905531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994975,0.001000568,0.00040917084,0.00065602426,0.002055333,0.0009040038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041367547,0.00038127392,0.00034263052,0.00086802733,0.015905295,0.0052783913,0.001551703,0.002590887,0.009080712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00858118,0.00039025582,0.0004081219,0.0010102257,0.0153327165,0.0018946463,0.0039047345,0.0049571996,0.0006632908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006424085,0.00003677229,0.01746863,0.0000865421,0.000035158337,0.0012749614,0.13267265,0.0008073011,0.0015874499,0.7904595,0.022752827,0.032753948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051301577,0.00012208392,0.076066986,0.00068528514,0.000099620345,0.00067266665,0.07691771,0.001998262,0.0015964538,0.051737156,0.78986317,0.00018935851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86937445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9321243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13062555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031048235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04178201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2627896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285677011","doi":"10.29173/crossings97","title":"Re-Interpreting Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Crossings An Undergraduate Arts Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Appeal; Law; Political science; Legal pluralism; Adjudication; Treaty; Kinship; State (computer science); Salient; Legal realism; Comparative law","score_opus":0.04559373935482998,"score_gpt":0.34694844381007134,"score_spread":0.3013547044552414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285677011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019918425,0.0029978117,0.030590925,0.051781762,0.0019086715,0.00016224898,0.00017237333,0.0002670756,0.89220065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8032703,0.0027706292,0.014769321,0.018475574,0.00084824994,0.00011669825,0.00026401234,0.00047240572,0.15901284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866623,0.004142058,0.00043779612,0.0018845365,0.0042402437,0.002633057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911476,0.0026888622,0.00035352755,0.0016240514,0.0037950112,0.00039099608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015443914,0.0009373284,0.0007183083,0.0030537941,0.012962642,0.013605545,0.0037456322,0.005616525,0.011269559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017891964,0.0004042716,0.00067469315,0.00192641,0.04431544,0.010177254,0.00754933,0.009168492,0.0019273501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006967193,0.0000044564654,0.0003102534,0.00003116283,0.00000418931,0.00025797382,0.026134243,0.00014708763,0.0002803248,0.9526592,0.012063671,0.0081005255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008353719,0.000010883973,0.00066680094,0.00033665315,0.000021985203,0.00021038625,0.03184193,0.00054613926,0.00076461927,0.2887811,0.6767737,0.000037413716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44531363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46296126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44531363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030822322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051685818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8854432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285711078","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4064993","title":"Opening the Canadian Constitution: Breathing New Life into the Federation? Not Likely","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Breathing; Law; Russian federation; Medicine; Geography; Psychiatry; Regional science","score_opus":0.03495176516184004,"score_gpt":0.2963403280488803,"score_spread":0.26138856288704027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285711078","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028116914,0.0040815743,0.001326508,0.57243246,0.0022922582,0.000046160494,0.00026634976,0.00006587236,0.391372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.781908,0.003202836,0.0014440989,0.10010959,0.00090560754,0.000065941145,0.00014599075,0.00011775162,0.11210021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98675764,0.0017498685,0.00012901177,0.0009998903,0.0031535942,0.007210011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988581,0.0015130199,0.00040945635,0.00063055725,0.004069237,0.0047967476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0094184475,0.00049499894,0.0007629178,0.0013301147,0.054433424,0.015459707,0.002466726,0.010914289,0.0268768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024657153,0.00037925944,0.00044161396,0.0022750543,0.02872047,0.011958546,0.0064567868,0.015047752,0.001538892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026255613,0.000025229556,0.0012213523,0.00003949991,0.000010691876,0.00011526047,0.010930766,0.00010946163,0.0000878868,0.8480964,0.12444826,0.014888884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028046641,0.000021336293,0.0062337318,0.00047982857,0.0000333433,0.00009962163,0.054811034,0.0002990167,0.00023528225,0.1091809,0.828431,0.00014689057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9615982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9809764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9153321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08466792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24073601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61431164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286656278","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-06263-6_5","title":"Smudging, Yoga and Ethical Veganism: Exploring the Boundaries of Religious and Spiritual Practice in Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Religion, spirituality and health: a social scientific approach","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Spirituality; Conceptualization; Indigenous; Sociology; Law; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12779995591611698,"score_gpt":0.369029067575123,"score_spread":0.241229111659006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286656278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06644897,0.041127335,0.006611006,0.043631155,0.0007695235,0.000060868133,0.000023862254,0.000028998973,0.8412984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8917235,0.013565652,0.0038204645,0.005670826,0.00048493463,0.00016935496,0.000027594284,0.000053543903,0.084484145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872524,0.00092959666,0.000017771654,0.000050463415,0.00016780313,0.00010919939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977284,0.0019123597,0.000091167305,0.00006379258,0.000090637186,0.00011361969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015347741,0.00030415476,0.00029404517,0.0009652513,0.003837205,0.0073256628,0.0010709193,0.00256596,0.0032830408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032749292,0.00024836385,0.00021173632,0.0012221652,0.035806686,0.0063362136,0.0032617005,0.00476699,0.00023727123],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010213475,0.000031873933,0.00032428934,0.000056407636,0.0000019406007,0.00009655351,0.085926674,0.000057128098,0.00012548834,0.89072704,0.0046494673,0.017992944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017660312,0.00004232224,0.0030846018,0.0007940174,0.0000065675836,0.00043721468,0.1401434,0.00052775745,0.0002978277,0.658491,0.19613631,0.000021288995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058263033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01450341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073256628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027729191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038038276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020119011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287446906","doi":"10.1093/obo/9780195399301-0485","title":"Margery Kempe","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Renaissance and Reformation","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Mysticism; Faith; The Renaissance; Art; Imprisonment; White (mutation); SAINT; German; Classics; History; Art history; Literature; Sociology; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036949537744204924,"score_gpt":0.30033820414796825,"score_spread":0.26338866640376335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287446906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007686606,0.058522277,0.001202794,0.03971858,0.013429057,0.000050443217,0.0006567925,0.00036449273,0.87836903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017426522,0.010873395,0.00037807124,0.0039319955,0.00062651595,0.000019048735,0.00012810058,0.00011943864,0.9664969],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963605,0.000051085335,0.000015023946,0.00014059666,0.00010258978,0.000054600805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995566,0.00009421826,0.0000363162,0.000032703112,0.000109905915,0.00017031394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033724235,0.00047492486,0.00021637852,0.0008652741,0.0028645913,0.002944463,0.0005061694,0.0012580575,0.22269247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018242066,0.00023577543,0.00013377683,0.00058259896,0.00091495406,0.0020084984,0.0019925723,0.0014918573,0.09662273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002948736,0.00001719725,0.00043141685,0.0003061232,0.00000258988,0.0005426702,0.0029459803,0.00003848713,0.00045420145,0.022012366,0.86824137,0.10497811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.9314e-7,0.0000027316303,0.00023184482,0.00006735278,5.096924e-7,0.00028065912,0.0006023432,0.0000038946296,0.00007058949,0.00037674216,0.9983608,0.0000019618965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036409586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01015441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22269247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014344519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011813724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7449806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288540096","doi":"","title":"Retour sur la place de l’intérêt supérieur de l’enfant dans la décision d’expulsion du territoire canadien d’un père ayant un enfant en charge","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Charge (physics); Political science; Psychology; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.009670115845632803,"score_gpt":0.24123717928739896,"score_spread":0.23156706344176617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288540096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4828447,0.006481368,0.0036929126,0.20595714,0.0013650941,0.00002540804,0.0000869549,0.000014619457,0.2995318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814005,0.0006651804,0.00035303936,0.002384994,0.00013610498,0.00001163935,0.000011597887,0.0000199621,0.015016993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99094814,0.0047458117,0.0002157476,0.00077568536,0.001362562,0.0019520953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97946966,0.013547548,0.0012910423,0.0006676144,0.0028305976,0.002193594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012159381,0.00033528364,0.00043295347,0.0018628078,0.018062616,0.014740375,0.0021956635,0.0074466346,0.013056006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025801087,0.00044039483,0.00041297663,0.0017963193,0.022115724,0.010295548,0.0068630697,0.009229781,0.0007446127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016176324,0.000030331052,0.0047732648,0.00009435691,0.000026724056,0.0020034595,0.4364025,0.00023721348,0.00045918816,0.52875257,0.008396128,0.018662505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021201568,0.00006528052,0.016085118,0.00070969446,0.000039005172,0.000724209,0.70392424,0.00031129934,0.00077384146,0.056848835,0.22042465,0.00007262982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.111851044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14455765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88814896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013632385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011960371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22240001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289355304","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebac013","title":"Experience with Ontario’s <i>Parenting Plan Guide</i> and <i>Template</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Multidisciplinary approach; Plan (archaeology); Conciliation; Psychology; Mental health; Resource (disambiguation); Medical education; Nursing; Political science; Public relations; Medicine; Psychiatry; Law; Mediation","score_opus":0.038377389262331744,"score_gpt":0.32988441375496086,"score_spread":0.2915070244926291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289355304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8255141,0.0009541711,0.005407516,0.010271135,0.0002718034,0.00065524894,0.0009919704,0.00037477224,0.15555927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88687545,0.0018216418,0.01078824,0.0020620557,0.000045915058,0.00032465122,0.0010390652,0.0003348574,0.0967082],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952029,0.0020517965,0.00017380809,0.00029855268,0.0014354342,0.00083753536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99156475,0.0022229487,0.00047679644,0.0006813903,0.002297737,0.0027563286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006761436,0.00032881397,0.00022136087,0.00070042803,0.010660202,0.002114181,0.0015641579,0.001125013,0.011439161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013008878,0.0007347104,0.0003290614,0.0016148161,0.0033303893,0.0013817792,0.0026183769,0.0014984487,0.0013450346],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007838729,0.00044188555,0.025026921,0.0001518986,0.0000099196095,0.004226141,0.76694167,0.0004958708,0.0022396317,0.004293875,0.0871941,0.10889974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025834775,0.00027010826,0.04934788,0.00029401088,0.00001395054,0.0009821021,0.29068315,0.0008964941,0.0009150773,0.0004991359,0.6559758,0.00009645685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9095637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97761106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09043628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03315781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040891323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24057788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294326431","doi":"10.1093/he/9780191948909.003.0017","title":"Entick v Carrington [1765] 95 ER 807, King’s Bench","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Principle of legality; Law; Government (linguistics); History; Political science; Philosophy; Economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03719486046771367,"score_gpt":0.24752231749681233,"score_spread":0.21032745702909866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294326431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025170867,0.011298996,0.00040195114,0.02304511,0.0014735026,0.0000674847,0.0001931489,0.000031302596,0.9609714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061530408,0.004083257,0.0004630194,0.050938744,0.0006198248,0.00019869769,0.000109784356,0.00006286925,0.88199335],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979087,0.0003631393,0.00009846463,0.00034274053,0.00079089246,0.00049611204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936944,0.00030302117,0.000060604347,0.00004084455,0.00016437013,0.0000617182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018389769,0.0008087657,0.00038402216,0.001667011,0.00728518,0.006703076,0.0016297022,0.013236224,0.030946314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00502298,0.0006699223,0.00033481407,0.0015097312,0.0062732184,0.004646579,0.00233259,0.009014382,0.0073654177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017782992,0.000010209975,0.0001378778,0.00007352129,0.0000030178153,0.0003076873,0.0030261546,0.000048042017,0.000118271695,0.4732906,0.51431733,0.008649614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074378668,0.000007744107,0.0004123317,0.00025535628,0.0000045247157,0.00009401013,0.00078934693,0.000027567563,0.0001351045,0.013635733,0.98461306,0.000017803099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2448859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3791893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2448859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015515611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008303609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48692107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4299854058","doi":"10.3138/9781442689510","title":"Essays in the History of Canadian Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; History; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04246731379720787,"score_gpt":0.22325342782828267,"score_spread":0.1807861140310748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4299854058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023291174,0.0594152,0.00031135514,0.03546726,0.004082498,0.000030162482,0.00044441342,0.000061845145,0.89785814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05247763,0.045449495,0.00069513853,0.009170602,0.0012196525,0.000041177012,0.00033505692,0.00008936627,0.89052194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831665,0.00011672749,0.000027597685,0.0001282508,0.0009773511,0.0004334839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987658,0.00017287233,0.00002877619,0.000043551605,0.0007856852,0.00020331745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087142875,0.00084437925,0.00042666378,0.0048085684,0.02714054,0.0071631176,0.0016210143,0.002211679,0.032864377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026782905,0.00041093357,0.0004078825,0.008975698,0.008401115,0.0025636335,0.0015489756,0.0026016904,0.002821217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000836618,0.000010005275,0.0002790519,0.000086576096,0.0000035458504,0.000098416735,0.004024669,0.00009955443,0.00006513908,0.27765757,0.6899804,0.027686667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011065006,8.1243576e-7,0.00057950587,0.00009025709,0.0000016891536,0.000020935277,0.0009861982,0.000021608776,0.000016957849,0.0037972068,0.994478,0.0000056556496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9843227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14118356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14118356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1266005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300462089","doi":"10.3138/9781442684980","title":"The Persons Case","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Event (particle physics); Political science; Law; Psychology; History; Communication","score_opus":0.03713377580320751,"score_gpt":0.25474213035579024,"score_spread":0.21760835455258273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300462089","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005749977,0.001714352,0.00065174577,0.0152750965,0.0003722176,0.000025862488,0.00007631887,0.000019562434,0.97611475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24315684,0.0034136497,0.0005769655,0.028890623,0.0003923124,0.00007041216,0.000115700976,0.00004629242,0.7233372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975051,0.00058633974,0.000036893467,0.00021671421,0.0006692031,0.0009856905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993017,0.00025606868,0.000041945423,0.00007603647,0.0001437118,0.00018057603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016033585,0.0002492948,0.00023501366,0.0005778595,0.010992188,0.0047094543,0.0008235329,0.004458254,0.024710601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033824875,0.0002444336,0.00045573298,0.0006869717,0.0061056796,0.0030316242,0.0026461934,0.0038372162,0.0020889333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000989151,0.000010086736,0.0003795195,0.000015376418,0.0000027079973,0.000483909,0.0029681253,0.000039170918,0.000054714248,0.87929326,0.105938405,0.010804763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053556055,0.000008138071,0.00072421104,0.00011226089,0.0000057554444,0.00038699087,0.0032245026,0.00004481607,0.00015333595,0.022076702,0.9732482,0.000009729858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25597122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36459956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7440288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008932871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011936053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50896263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300589591","doi":"","title":"HIV/AIDS in the courts--Canada. Court affirms that severance exclusion for workers with disabilities violates Charter.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Severance; Appeal; Charter; Law; Political science; Constitutional court; Business; Constitution","score_opus":0.03078045482074922,"score_gpt":0.2576051799016946,"score_spread":0.2268247250809454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300589591","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063165106,0.0046376893,0.0010078397,0.170423,0.0014519286,0.00036918628,0.0020110384,0.00012459366,0.7568096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4914341,0.0029303783,0.002029239,0.11671864,0.0003436206,0.0001589044,0.0005896305,0.000044950357,0.38575062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99467117,0.00031613986,0.00013113263,0.0002765817,0.0023444602,0.0022605446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99646676,0.00072432804,0.00013367401,0.000114338975,0.0018507348,0.00071016117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026362687,0.00031646257,0.00032876915,0.00083373865,0.028986776,0.006203564,0.0017001436,0.006989321,0.008926132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006199514,0.0004489943,0.0005683077,0.0011009596,0.005377116,0.0010433194,0.0016617032,0.0068519535,0.00084613945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054535834,0.00007345874,0.008529037,0.0000983917,0.000025584062,0.0015922264,0.01260341,0.00025606068,0.0009772647,0.5391524,0.40961996,0.027017752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085898944,0.000043561362,0.025213767,0.00041890398,0.00009294845,0.0006054946,0.010032108,0.0007924252,0.0010733892,0.020405998,0.9411168,0.00011860216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98878294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99650925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039659955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039659955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15600248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28775448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301322948","doi":"","title":"Robert William Latimer v. Her Majesty The Queen: in the Supreme Court of Canada.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Law; Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.024276464342073357,"score_gpt":0.25257370807357965,"score_spread":0.22829724373150628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301322948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021803668,0.025183827,0.00066789245,0.44362247,0.003929115,0.0000965406,0.0019271458,0.00011921582,0.5026501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.238937,0.008532969,0.0007817094,0.15827203,0.00086231064,0.00007141634,0.00039561017,0.00014775994,0.5919992],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99596405,0.00027508885,0.00009212654,0.00026126663,0.0018285809,0.0015789615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954595,0.0009081246,0.000121429795,0.000091867325,0.0026134616,0.0008057144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020800093,0.000451512,0.00053549744,0.0010330825,0.029460827,0.006553189,0.0021905995,0.012028276,0.018111525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010507786,0.00052910566,0.0004946841,0.0017571435,0.0041106455,0.0027344285,0.0020156866,0.012675173,0.0020496128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051871448,0.000019388213,0.002694263,0.00006463355,0.000018112038,0.0004889092,0.0033792565,0.000092752336,0.00025463448,0.1112858,0.8715588,0.010091604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003132872,0.00001432608,0.010367061,0.00039122172,0.00007365751,0.00015663942,0.006954012,0.00019468024,0.0006774568,0.012566902,0.96848506,0.000087657674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9842339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044174723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044174723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.116043895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32051158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306316358","doi":"10.46747/cfp.6810764","title":"Reversal of <i>Roe v Wade</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Family Physician","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Pregnancy; Depression (economics); Computer science; Medicine; Psychiatry; Biology","score_opus":0.026039797818804104,"score_gpt":0.2597848361954723,"score_spread":0.2337450383766682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306316358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018558492,0.0014597502,0.0018290043,0.17016762,0.023340039,0.00006869812,0.00017363917,0.00081152585,0.80029386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035850056,0.001194814,0.0017760011,0.109329976,0.0019046634,0.00008969809,0.00012327525,0.00080415735,0.8489272],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867404,0.00028221606,0.000032633943,0.00016772494,0.0004674826,0.00037592274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843985,0.00011558412,0.00006079127,0.00012208872,0.0007938482,0.00046780685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011371527,0.0005062029,0.0003130751,0.00052188645,0.011320145,0.0037558237,0.0012359256,0.003966105,0.119532704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005636879,0.00035758832,0.0004935549,0.00031201853,0.0048581846,0.0038819902,0.0034100055,0.010088258,0.046141304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011430072,0.000010109384,0.00019893634,0.000020745661,0.0000020304851,0.00023769928,0.0017104435,0.000010188789,0.00013186777,0.023288667,0.9601622,0.014215571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002814078,0.000004842822,0.00026174492,0.00005224186,0.0000014299962,0.00033662125,0.0017491573,0.000016371107,0.000073471594,0.0015000168,0.9959915,0.000009666611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12630169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23932524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12630169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00296699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005576601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3998767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308786464","doi":"10.1163/17455316-18030006","title":"A Comparison of the Porvoo, Waterloo, and Called to Common Mission Agreements from the Perspective of Transitivity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Transitive relation; Presupposition; Perspective (graphical); Banyan; Sociology; History of religions; Law; Political science; Theology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.054688826396058356,"score_gpt":0.36895305017493857,"score_spread":0.3142642237788802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308786464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55160767,0.0008416712,0.003752887,0.005748738,0.0000809728,0.00010681714,0.00007534931,0.000013226226,0.43777275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99594575,0.00008580749,0.00024997722,0.00016823699,0.000005433622,0.000030723935,0.000014568234,0.0000060342054,0.0034934916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847007,0.008112918,0.00057094323,0.0006841016,0.0023682246,0.0035630702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832087,0.010631993,0.0015737175,0.0010502931,0.0024050989,0.001130176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009546172,0.00015477237,0.00036014206,0.0030910876,0.010232952,0.010960549,0.001529361,0.002415158,0.006481704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02813062,0.00029565816,0.0003505213,0.0035941063,0.020619001,0.007362716,0.008239577,0.0029656503,0.00017732989],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028319799,0.00001255761,0.0017864065,0.0000297152,0.0000066670514,0.00014422403,0.059197843,0.00016299903,0.000095976386,0.9343072,0.0005859753,0.0036420296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000697968,0.00011900996,0.035028245,0.000903215,0.00006317666,0.00021111271,0.5645488,0.0024683012,0.0007322945,0.25649372,0.13925944,0.000102928156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14713758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19215506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14713758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025705704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015460366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2925623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310051473","doi":"10.1558/bar.24602","title":"Hell Hath No Fury By M. R. Henning (2021) and Divine Bodies By C. R. Moss (2019)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Body and Religion","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Crandall University","funders":"","keywords":"Perfection; New Testament; Early Christianity; Philosophy; Christianity; Theology; Haven; Martin luther; Christian theology; Religious studies; Literature; Art history; Art","score_opus":0.009258984673987862,"score_gpt":0.2587288894644893,"score_spread":0.24946990479050143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310051473","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000897901,0.697755,0.00026825204,0.2506065,0.015776955,0.000014074034,0.00007774247,0.000021798727,0.03458176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03956805,0.50316113,0.0016098558,0.06522395,0.018138954,0.000100697245,0.00012765455,0.0001431191,0.37192667],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999086,0.00033161667,0.000035002176,0.00012804681,0.0003290994,0.00009017075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987575,0.0004721815,0.00013354312,0.000037435184,0.00026058574,0.0003387454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017744757,0.0010785342,0.00060379505,0.0013899774,0.0051919487,0.004321792,0.00080440316,0.003885449,0.017591983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028301682,0.0006505148,0.00041277352,0.0015742488,0.0053458232,0.007490795,0.0031498952,0.0075584683,0.007191925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020976311,0.000012499252,0.0003170966,0.00019268607,0.0000040220434,0.000099807614,0.0034268422,0.00003810899,0.0000835073,0.025993627,0.91986746,0.049943198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041063795,0.000010423085,0.0012688857,0.0007995381,0.000003498519,0.0001623932,0.0027804535,0.000023321983,0.00005050117,0.0064981915,0.98838425,0.0000144942105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030490696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09248132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030490696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035304923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044579115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060626447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310143484","doi":"10.32920/21631925.v1","title":"Determining the “Core of Indianness:” A Feminist Political Economy of NIL/TU,O v. BCGEU","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Queen's University; University of Ottawa; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Indigenous; Political science; Politics; Supreme court; Legislation; Trade union; Law; Sociology; Political economy; Economics; Labour economics","score_opus":0.07680886659921828,"score_gpt":0.3634729018774138,"score_spread":0.28666403527819556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310143484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13533981,0.0026933681,0.0054513197,0.16100961,0.0005143217,0.000059525424,0.00007184932,0.00003288918,0.6948273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9566142,0.00045260997,0.0006064321,0.018631127,0.0002240506,0.000048000846,0.000013352331,0.000027197302,0.023383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99324834,0.0023462812,0.00007991057,0.00062148797,0.0013243259,0.0023796184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969613,0.0019468974,0.00021895558,0.00012403856,0.00033465092,0.00041410627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006473731,0.00022074039,0.00033828762,0.0008831334,0.024132414,0.013017115,0.00163119,0.0054362505,0.0031935514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00797872,0.00039077128,0.00037606634,0.0009287666,0.05183977,0.004607367,0.005847468,0.012525454,0.0002200075],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006117877,0.000005667627,0.00029445862,0.000007414099,9.698626e-7,0.00010220246,0.026361674,0.00006692228,0.000092871014,0.9697917,0.0020693906,0.0012005932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026155774,0.00003508605,0.005243865,0.00039337072,0.000032401702,0.00024634416,0.12818548,0.0012652571,0.0013817996,0.4400572,0.42301705,0.000115882554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42234734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47894922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9692295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030770473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022846352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.839778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310143485","doi":"10.32920/21631925","title":"Determining the “Core of Indianness:” A Feminist Political Economy of NIL/TU,O v. BCGEU","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Queen's University; University of Ottawa; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Indigenous; Political science; Politics; Supreme court; Legislation; Law; Trade union; Sociology; Political economy; Economics; Labour economics","score_opus":0.07680886659921828,"score_gpt":0.3634729018774138,"score_spread":0.28666403527819556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310143485","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13533981,0.0026933681,0.0054513197,0.16100961,0.0005143217,0.000059525424,0.00007184932,0.00003288918,0.6948273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9566142,0.00045260997,0.0006064321,0.018631127,0.0002240506,0.000048000846,0.000013352331,0.000027197302,0.023383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99324834,0.0023462812,0.00007991057,0.00062148797,0.0013243259,0.0023796184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969613,0.0019468974,0.00021895558,0.00012403856,0.00033465092,0.00041410627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006473731,0.00022074039,0.00033828762,0.0008831334,0.024132414,0.013017115,0.00163119,0.0054362505,0.0031935514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00797872,0.00039077128,0.00037606634,0.0009287666,0.05183977,0.004607367,0.005847468,0.012525454,0.0002200075],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006117877,0.000005667627,0.00029445862,0.000007414099,9.698626e-7,0.00010220246,0.026361674,0.00006692228,0.000092871014,0.9697917,0.0020693906,0.0012005932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026155774,0.00003508605,0.005243865,0.00039337072,0.000032401702,0.00024634416,0.12818548,0.0012652571,0.0013817996,0.4400572,0.42301705,0.000115882554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42234734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47894922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9692295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030770473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022846352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.839778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312767195","doi":"10.56315/pscf12-21ashford","title":"The Doctrine of Creation: A Constructive Kuyperian Approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Constructive; Epistemology; Philosophy; Calculus (dental); Computer science; Programming language; Medicine; Theology; Dentistry; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.018568433742292386,"score_gpt":0.3129437401835317,"score_spread":0.2943753064412393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312767195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057633817,0.07648769,0.0296946,0.04673017,0.0026278289,0.00004277681,0.00005056353,0.00007762311,0.8385253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58390033,0.06267281,0.03174886,0.01366794,0.007034099,0.00028284083,0.00009976307,0.00023955687,0.30035388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726945,0.0015871455,0.00006697328,0.00021532492,0.0006165331,0.00024462093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981408,0.00118267,0.00012121257,0.00015288024,0.0002721624,0.00013024964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035221698,0.0005749722,0.0006101438,0.0019114338,0.0047804937,0.007142197,0.0012503237,0.0026699188,0.0050390987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029660899,0.00037249757,0.00047437017,0.001722636,0.028206915,0.009853694,0.0038762377,0.005499929,0.0016805216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002256664,0.000004502621,0.000018632558,0.000018429942,6.9002203e-7,0.000020239517,0.0011066786,0.00006068634,0.000025936457,0.98947877,0.006043012,0.003220035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004947734,0.000007788467,0.000111158566,0.0001757876,0.0000020810035,0.00010451806,0.0015665679,0.00027996986,0.00008095246,0.7115995,0.2860573,0.000009338569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002297479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032333464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007142197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005706335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050287168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04140258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312906517","doi":"10.15581/016.52.763","title":"Piero AMENTA, Administrative Procedures in Canonical Marriage Cases: History, Legislation and Praxis. Colection Gratianus Series, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, Québec 2011. xxiii, 258 pp.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ius Canonicum","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Legislation; Series (stratigraphy); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Geology","score_opus":0.05497576856850216,"score_gpt":0.32816249509923034,"score_spread":0.2731867265307282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312906517","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00599808,0.47711796,0.0024438035,0.27462718,0.005094276,0.000115764466,0.0022912417,0.000257235,0.23205443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14650667,0.32802412,0.0028929373,0.08390466,0.0061046276,0.00040506697,0.0010930506,0.0003655054,0.43070337],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986743,0.00035227815,0.000042089618,0.00010561025,0.00047738632,0.00034836165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981249,0.0009902263,0.00016899161,0.00005493999,0.0005011683,0.00015977786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001844834,0.0006481295,0.00038155608,0.0029275378,0.008216028,0.00376283,0.0022773447,0.0045806426,0.01798853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005003621,0.00077516306,0.00030039632,0.0045554847,0.0045142453,0.0038893432,0.0016706374,0.0027472067,0.0038460991],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001857709,0.000013797346,0.0006403989,0.00011645846,0.0000033083072,0.00013393899,0.0020715282,0.000050575312,0.000056002114,0.03285988,0.9379808,0.026054751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021486705,0.000007143527,0.010723219,0.0006314156,0.000011601803,0.00017471057,0.0045096115,0.00013774178,0.0002031733,0.0098019615,0.9737465,0.000031559895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7259441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.884145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7259441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014443222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017240725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55133975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313001868","doi":"10.9783/9780812298390","title":"The Textual Effects of David Walker's \"Appeal\"","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Pennsylvania Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Art; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.018422447468999636,"score_gpt":0.23819037290718947,"score_spread":0.21976792543818985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313001868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18932775,0.007922098,0.0018292576,0.07023192,0.0048947237,0.00006188186,0.00019447375,0.00017947053,0.7253584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8970938,0.0016904619,0.0005675562,0.008728374,0.001369849,0.000042782496,0.00004859997,0.00008474133,0.090373866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865216,0.0006912359,0.000031896438,0.00013000652,0.00039889888,0.00009582159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950722,0.0037317371,0.00035197526,0.00011860035,0.0004419045,0.00028358048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012480192,0.00023972207,0.00013548913,0.001579285,0.004853381,0.0041270345,0.00040564436,0.0012983443,0.0051262258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069148317,0.00013497307,0.0001247423,0.000951522,0.006835848,0.0015347857,0.0028045266,0.0019344379,0.00073186844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015527003,0.00006322628,0.0037661863,0.0004323498,0.000015805228,0.0025862684,0.29719973,0.0001450628,0.0051662116,0.40874088,0.21943922,0.06228974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001219542,0.000041668794,0.0038714667,0.00027089007,0.000009565971,0.0006614317,0.033338983,0.00009290009,0.002058529,0.009581324,0.9500346,0.000026430558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005678232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015630666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005678232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027180226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011925334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019720674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313167187","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192843272.003.0007","title":"Constitutional Theory, Federalism, and Cities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Federalism; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law and economics; Section (typography); Sociology; Law; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.044647882376562004,"score_gpt":0.294248637155134,"score_spread":0.249600754778572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313167187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010204531,0.006270509,0.0074681267,0.016156789,0.0002886198,0.000020510122,0.00009134489,0.00004243393,0.95945716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8587548,0.005753191,0.003522929,0.0031666944,0.00030833855,0.00006920678,0.00015473881,0.000038793136,0.12823129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940693,0.0001798246,0.000011669209,0.000091823254,0.00015677148,0.00015299067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966156,0.00015195932,0.000022312503,0.000038789567,0.0000864992,0.000038866074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007213452,0.00018212959,0.00022496308,0.0008664349,0.004825058,0.0036988966,0.00077519374,0.00096625893,0.007539113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010525129,0.00012741306,0.00021562251,0.0014127352,0.013773073,0.0021089872,0.0012114829,0.0020148186,0.0003126856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.8311442e-7,5.4277007e-7,0.000009996394,0.0000016813361,1.4610522e-7,0.0000020471432,0.00006676226,0.00008375867,0.0000031502361,0.9984263,0.0009782836,0.00042704906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034638656,0.000002767039,0.00033006957,0.000045008255,0.0000025396184,0.000012960955,0.00049952616,0.0006188863,0.00005267089,0.7975544,0.20087306,0.0000047628428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20549853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21813576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20549853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020603828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010566504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40860474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313425474","doi":"10.55476/001c.66252","title":"The Papal Apologies to Indigenous Peoples in Canada - Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Archbishop; Indigenous; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; History; Classics","score_opus":0.03062873834942487,"score_gpt":0.30187888847171973,"score_spread":0.27125015012229486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313425474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50563645,0.022392845,0.0013882515,0.11605608,0.003541358,0.00020619055,0.00070832664,0.000107780346,0.34996274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9159962,0.005563803,0.0004955035,0.004966174,0.00017822125,0.000034741504,0.00008674511,0.000038937887,0.07263979],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764377,0.0003000992,0.00003129665,0.00017339464,0.00083817914,0.0010132212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755436,0.0004997539,0.0001396985,0.000054948974,0.0009285374,0.000822779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015784679,0.00038036087,0.00030369553,0.0010973732,0.036147635,0.007329159,0.001678837,0.0022227734,0.006970113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004668629,0.0002522673,0.00017619306,0.0024366027,0.012904251,0.0013624979,0.003411858,0.0039241225,0.0003442506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005237268,0.000052767944,0.0065771746,0.00031428525,0.000013066165,0.0020118526,0.7078582,0.00022279743,0.00062163774,0.102248766,0.1266087,0.053418495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047270646,0.000013731566,0.012791696,0.00034096197,0.000009140995,0.00034498578,0.3989348,0.000116556905,0.00030367362,0.00255941,0.5845333,0.00004715792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9893071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99522674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1096895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1096895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13308196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7958567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313425493","doi":"10.55476/001c.66236","title":"Pope Francis’ Apology: Encounter and Meaning","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Indigenous; Sociology; Law; Media studies; History; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.05009670973549197,"score_gpt":0.33708695512139736,"score_spread":0.2869902453859054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313425493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20026,0.011270845,0.006797944,0.1483588,0.0035137383,0.000054589527,0.00007133906,0.00012869794,0.62954414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96126944,0.0014702952,0.00064543245,0.0051778653,0.00039443112,0.000025613454,0.0000149889165,0.00006871257,0.030933239],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913243,0.005288232,0.00013848132,0.0005315029,0.0014413615,0.0012760302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950252,0.0026084254,0.00048608799,0.00026674307,0.0007754737,0.0008380441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035655282,0.00049016,0.00042657935,0.0014353141,0.03555962,0.012153019,0.0014447641,0.0065001943,0.0035703327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01823638,0.00038147677,0.00021453683,0.0013340223,0.058933582,0.0073601305,0.009113469,0.00843928,0.00060764636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017959286,0.000009293416,0.0004902249,0.000038193884,0.0000046307446,0.0017300218,0.74523646,0.000040881365,0.0001431687,0.21958691,0.026317498,0.006384785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004334533,0.00001460634,0.00058131106,0.00023223842,0.000004411071,0.0009827105,0.4980511,0.00008998933,0.0002003577,0.024554193,0.4752466,0.000038124963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06712364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08062712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06712364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012108778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009292138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13346589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315865937","doi":"10.4324/9781003036593-46","title":"The Law of Secession in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Supreme court; Referendum; Political science; Law; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Legislation; Alienation; Self-determination; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.03957956900967035,"score_gpt":0.28940881879745567,"score_spread":0.2498292497877853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315865937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011186313,0.012055839,0.0007809267,0.013212671,0.00034686955,0.00003443473,0.00013532277,0.000029795234,0.9622178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6533178,0.016576793,0.0011921378,0.009329085,0.00023928622,0.000092794166,0.00018914165,0.00006441367,0.31899858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774337,0.0002394909,0.000040077528,0.00017982771,0.00088346144,0.0009138085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999204,0.00015775788,0.000034592802,0.00003994858,0.00044452952,0.00011931426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008590189,0.00036340658,0.0003361678,0.0011526737,0.018477868,0.008774293,0.0013874051,0.0028700952,0.009730056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023489245,0.00033395115,0.00024614975,0.0029062445,0.015343431,0.0018178438,0.0022650515,0.0036422925,0.0006720703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028277082,0.0000030981369,0.00020479057,0.000017496955,0.0000015993397,0.000077295444,0.0030923411,0.00012429708,0.000036608642,0.97550935,0.016637865,0.004292296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014013611,0.00000904402,0.002164754,0.00030124647,0.000013440269,0.00011240314,0.00601727,0.0005618025,0.00012722376,0.07677382,0.9138661,0.00003886201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9910746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117638744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.117638744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15582329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8535328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W431699311","doi":"","title":"The court reconvenes : courtly literature across the disciplines : selected papers from the Ninth Triennial Congress of the International Courtly Literature Society, University of British Columbia, 25-31 July, 1998","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ninth; Scholarship; Ideology; Poetics; History; Literature; Variety (cybernetics); Literary criticism; Tragedy (event); Classics; Media studies; Poetry; Social science; Sociology; Political science; Law; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.008881878869624889,"score_gpt":0.2425857972774161,"score_spread":0.23370391840779123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W431699311","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03677829,0.45936662,0.0005605866,0.1639783,0.01292605,0.00016029776,0.00061029836,0.000085973166,0.32553354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22363846,0.28911063,0.0007584868,0.010912017,0.006227746,0.0002660587,0.0010919689,0.00024402954,0.46775058],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869245,0.00031950042,0.00006381951,0.00013240443,0.00060201343,0.00018981622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973174,0.0011136121,0.00023524882,0.00009399122,0.00074722647,0.00049246097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020066681,0.0005770609,0.0007390833,0.0062102466,0.011407606,0.011588882,0.0010548342,0.0026873273,0.008931816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004742442,0.0005246346,0.00013791714,0.017976174,0.005257936,0.0037206248,0.0031214857,0.0028399767,0.0011457577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031752432,0.000061207036,0.0011262783,0.0006867646,0.0000065476374,0.00036994662,0.073536314,0.00007869872,0.0003766125,0.02612439,0.80785376,0.08974778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063234543,0.000009077309,0.005601157,0.0015235131,0.000004950091,0.00015856003,0.041201677,0.000024171786,0.00014442122,0.0020519858,0.94926184,0.000012347614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18921502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47971925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18921502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01684272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014983969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37622732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317369044","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198854081.003.0006","title":"Challenges and Contestations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Duty; Equity (law); Political science; Appeal; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.11907223010604079,"score_gpt":0.3324402776527627,"score_spread":0.2133680475467219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317369044","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074701086,0.00800169,0.008238899,0.76054054,0.0071493806,0.00004785921,0.00009677327,0.000074307056,0.20838036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6141311,0.008969923,0.009196459,0.24148132,0.011535626,0.00039740562,0.00025085866,0.00041946827,0.1136179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9679567,0.015285916,0.001071602,0.0036581983,0.007944975,0.004082553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97027963,0.019062104,0.0007203944,0.0025974335,0.00439482,0.0029455496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038567923,0.0006126486,0.0012281167,0.0015668873,0.01643815,0.019948818,0.0052570906,0.016650638,0.018547338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046854198,0.0005224683,0.0011653417,0.0015356622,0.051029235,0.02293831,0.018026898,0.029809093,0.0028959243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038321587,0.000009839127,0.000042585187,0.00001532406,0.0000013352868,0.000047442194,0.0018904264,0.00006340541,0.00002162975,0.9757224,0.018323349,0.0038584732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008097019,0.000011435171,0.00012708241,0.0002479642,0.0000017926193,0.00011196634,0.008415969,0.00026661836,0.00006213439,0.58419216,0.40653294,0.000021863725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009511707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007459948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038567923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014228784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015750336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20396906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317501235","doi":"10.4324/9781003367727-11","title":"Ajzenstat versus the Oligarchs","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Neglect; Politics; Subject (documents); Political science; Human rights; Political economy; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Art","score_opus":0.11640910065973716,"score_gpt":0.3471176512314384,"score_spread":0.23070855057170125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317501235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029914038,0.00586009,0.0010248364,0.052950617,0.0009500709,0.000015537076,0.000064500746,0.000063106774,0.9091572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6021908,0.0036448457,0.0007689319,0.013358147,0.0004038857,0.00004075092,0.000056490033,0.00012489145,0.37941128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823976,0.0003611459,0.000032968495,0.00020412735,0.0006352114,0.0005268328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988569,0.0003749714,0.000071525654,0.00007682252,0.0002590859,0.00036062778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010056501,0.00022016991,0.00028521565,0.0011744804,0.013740615,0.008459331,0.00061957404,0.0019553143,0.007555142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021626963,0.00019596616,0.00018316632,0.0020363503,0.01376006,0.0031134656,0.0023471385,0.0035057666,0.0010388561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014281272,0.0000081307535,0.00035390793,0.00002102515,0.0000019960303,0.00006364267,0.006996313,0.00003384914,0.00008443193,0.9656253,0.020766664,0.0060303244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008426342,0.0000102721,0.0019315112,0.00009177426,0.000009182175,0.00008492929,0.008765308,0.00018648531,0.00013469477,0.06883419,0.9199256,0.000017675928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4348392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.617057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4348392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020111885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01998885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8646163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317639099","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v13.i2.3","title":"“Blackstoned” Again: Common Law Liberties, the Canadian Constitution, and the Principles of Fundamental Justice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Supreme court; Common law; Political science; Constitution; Economic Justice; Deference; Fundamental rights; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.05786004422079469,"score_gpt":0.3357350044854204,"score_spread":0.27787496026462566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317639099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027430508,0.085615784,0.008876176,0.26594624,0.001997451,0.00005809187,0.00025411844,0.00004539014,0.6097762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8146154,0.031384356,0.004422968,0.0506038,0.0012863139,0.000067813555,0.00017176436,0.00004943955,0.09739814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971079,0.0006194658,0.00004319579,0.00023890212,0.0013232118,0.00066732586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847466,0.00055289915,0.00011565485,0.000078569916,0.00061468314,0.00016353496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002489094,0.00029545106,0.00032717513,0.0019277206,0.008644489,0.0061086137,0.0013309226,0.0024361461,0.005172435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048672603,0.00015694674,0.00029761862,0.0021923282,0.02265514,0.0038683177,0.0019950666,0.004138965,0.00031773438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034142279,0.0000025583486,0.0001201362,0.000019712765,0.0000020877485,0.00002853259,0.0010944484,0.0000618706,0.000023968832,0.98511225,0.008994577,0.004536386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000130142425,0.000011768797,0.0028477507,0.00031023967,0.00001514765,0.000060043334,0.0030282233,0.00028413103,0.00017838569,0.5696963,0.4235279,0.000027183909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88700926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91330713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11299074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038636234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051023025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28032684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318539256","doi":"10.1093/res/hgad008","title":"<scp>Ema Vyroubalová</scp> and <scp>James Robert Wood</scp> (eds). <i>The Literary Papers of the Reverend Jermyn Pratt (1723–1791)</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of English Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Poetry; Sister; Comedy; Art history; Art; Politics; History; Literature; Classics; Sociology; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.026703181310407238,"score_gpt":0.3078880057939828,"score_spread":0.28118482448357557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318539256","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012702668,0.639164,0.0017472934,0.04783421,0.029671082,0.000028315644,0.0005660518,0.00034424532,0.27937448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016279843,0.36252242,0.0010008521,0.007754816,0.016602367,0.00006531916,0.0009403224,0.00059108756,0.59424293],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994444,0.00008624461,0.000025038367,0.00011421001,0.0002869679,0.00004308258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991504,0.00029717467,0.0000784545,0.00004942512,0.0002347326,0.00018977164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055465114,0.001225002,0.00047245188,0.0015630428,0.0026240554,0.0075199315,0.000906029,0.001589579,0.051905107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018927266,0.00043583722,0.00030667754,0.002497291,0.0014456732,0.004573712,0.0020810538,0.0036522523,0.039169237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011230476,0.000009813768,0.00013419839,0.00021580987,0.000004399092,0.000075093056,0.0013672402,0.000038647806,0.000121558136,0.0070651863,0.91239125,0.07856557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.9343224e-7,0.0000014276396,0.0003834842,0.00020923195,0.0000011991883,0.000077863275,0.0004691962,0.000014146241,0.000023279521,0.000747239,0.9980696,0.000002631311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0114654675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027269084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051905107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019978685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002023861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1736399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319454220","doi":"10.32920/22056779","title":"Embodying Equality: Stigma, Safety and Clément Gascon’s Disability Justice Legacy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Ableism; Economic Justice; Originalism; Sociology; Ideology; Narrative; Embodied cognition; Law; Stigma (botany); Disability studies; Criminology; Politics; Political science; Gender studies; Constitution; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12592838453772365,"score_gpt":0.3948429153240583,"score_spread":0.26891453078633465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319454220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15535846,0.005285056,0.002654003,0.3435714,0.0008111143,0.000031747477,0.00003450385,0.000028130622,0.4922256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96900415,0.0007159679,0.00025160646,0.014978072,0.000099093835,0.000012866332,0.0000051055104,0.000011922049,0.014921222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956363,0.0013329622,0.0000542696,0.00041212395,0.0013098384,0.0012546023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779934,0.0011566711,0.00013324081,0.00014563542,0.0003519368,0.00041313868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038109513,0.00029722587,0.00028259098,0.0009969724,0.03620066,0.009490522,0.0011421568,0.006845949,0.003281052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059121335,0.00017417908,0.00024178634,0.00078567496,0.056392062,0.0060134716,0.007461897,0.007499627,0.00018826302],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070661854,0.000013287236,0.00055700354,0.000010759685,0.0000018823858,0.00032390797,0.07346333,0.000078932164,0.00008695921,0.9042623,0.01400132,0.0071932473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002032677,0.000026316437,0.002772467,0.00026618052,0.00001289254,0.0006518023,0.14921275,0.0003837998,0.0006245042,0.4038954,0.44205987,0.00007363143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47185457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4874759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52814543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027872605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021455089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93821615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319454221","doi":"10.32920/22056782.v1","title":"The Alchemy of Equality Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Politics; Law; Political science; Social equality; Test (biology); Character (mathematics); Law and economics; Inequality; Fundamental rights; Section (typography); Sociology; Human rights; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.14316608975174794,"score_gpt":0.40922821297976913,"score_spread":0.2660621232280212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319454221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005424751,0.0029672303,0.015139883,0.044971388,0.000607499,0.000030109435,0.0001740278,0.00005498808,0.93063015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.797791,0.0036577415,0.008448785,0.018205345,0.0011726705,0.00015549536,0.0001571575,0.00017595652,0.1702359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930307,0.0019676832,0.00015691399,0.0012810444,0.0024472037,0.0011163936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968359,0.0011521293,0.00018028375,0.00071071764,0.0008385473,0.0002824854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052138176,0.00051588024,0.0005413113,0.0011923664,0.009212712,0.010320002,0.0013258398,0.0037445312,0.013519398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009227279,0.0004140358,0.0004908567,0.001025398,0.055246506,0.009582298,0.004973189,0.007921474,0.0019491805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013148798,7.7938455e-7,0.000014899704,0.0000030606643,6.6760043e-7,0.000005796318,0.00020311898,0.000022164595,0.000011626776,0.99750924,0.0014641384,0.00076298707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008020526,0.0000028913905,0.0001248196,0.00003771338,0.0000035263017,0.000025656263,0.00023117784,0.00015672497,0.00010901422,0.9061478,0.09314557,0.0000070451647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.140881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.098517604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.859119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016931366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013933576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28012198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319454222","doi":"10.32920/22056782","title":"The Alchemy of Equality Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Politics; Law; Character (mathematics); Test (biology); Political science; Social equality; Law and economics; Inequality; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14316608975174794,"score_gpt":0.40922821297976913,"score_spread":0.2660621232280212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319454222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005424751,0.0029672303,0.015139883,0.044971388,0.000607499,0.000030109435,0.0001740278,0.00005498808,0.93063015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.797791,0.0036577415,0.008448785,0.018205345,0.0011726705,0.00015549536,0.0001571575,0.00017595652,0.1702359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930307,0.0019676832,0.00015691399,0.0012810444,0.0024472037,0.0011163936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968359,0.0011521293,0.00018028375,0.00071071764,0.0008385473,0.0002824854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052138176,0.00051588024,0.0005413113,0.0011923664,0.009212712,0.010320002,0.0013258398,0.0037445312,0.013519398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009227279,0.0004140358,0.0004908567,0.001025398,0.055246506,0.009582298,0.004973189,0.007921474,0.0019491805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013148798,7.7938455e-7,0.000014899704,0.0000030606643,6.6760043e-7,0.000005796318,0.00020311898,0.000022164595,0.000011626776,0.99750924,0.0014641384,0.00076298707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008020526,0.0000028913905,0.0001248196,0.00003771338,0.0000035263017,0.000025656263,0.00023117784,0.00015672497,0.00010901422,0.9061478,0.09314557,0.0000070451647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.140881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.098517604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.859119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016931366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013933576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28012198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319454223","doi":"10.32920/22056779.v1","title":"Embodying Equality: Stigma, Safety and Clément Gascon’s Disability Justice Legacy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Ableism; Economic Justice; Originalism; Sociology; Ideology; Narrative; Embodied cognition; Law; Stigma (botany); Disability studies; Criminology; Politics; Political science; Gender studies; Constitution; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12592838453772365,"score_gpt":0.3948429153240583,"score_spread":0.26891453078633465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319454223","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15535846,0.005285056,0.002654003,0.3435714,0.0008111143,0.000031747477,0.00003450385,0.000028130622,0.4922256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96900415,0.0007159679,0.00025160646,0.014978072,0.000099093835,0.000012866332,0.0000051055104,0.000011922049,0.014921222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956363,0.0013329622,0.0000542696,0.00041212395,0.0013098384,0.0012546023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779934,0.0011566711,0.00013324081,0.00014563542,0.0003519368,0.00041313868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038109513,0.00029722587,0.00028259098,0.0009969724,0.03620066,0.009490522,0.0011421568,0.006845949,0.003281052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059121335,0.00017417908,0.00024178634,0.00078567496,0.056392062,0.0060134716,0.007461897,0.007499627,0.00018826302],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070661854,0.000013287236,0.00055700354,0.000010759685,0.0000018823858,0.00032390797,0.07346333,0.000078932164,0.00008695921,0.9042623,0.01400132,0.0071932473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002032677,0.000026316437,0.002772467,0.00026618052,0.00001289254,0.0006518023,0.14921275,0.0003837998,0.0006245042,0.4038954,0.44205987,0.00007363143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47185457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4874759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52814543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027872605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021455089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93821615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319586040","doi":"10.32920/22057217","title":"Assessing Analogous Grounds: The Doctrinal and Normative Superiority of a Multi-Variable Approach","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immutability; Charter; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Variable (mathematics); Constructive; CLARITY; Normative; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14593278975122803,"score_gpt":0.3846935734387983,"score_spread":0.23876078368757025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319586040","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090452984,0.033510707,0.46735245,0.08770458,0.0013216696,0.00063679897,0.00023081362,0.00014022544,0.31864977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88343394,0.0029653264,0.105099,0.0049579167,0.00042109063,0.00023628186,0.00006198306,0.000052930027,0.002771647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9451962,0.030338893,0.0021125523,0.0036497072,0.016586335,0.0021162557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90833735,0.06913273,0.0066280584,0.004514244,0.009923635,0.0014640371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045867234,0.0008752859,0.0016101373,0.012222625,0.006598665,0.015447255,0.006067768,0.0056569707,0.0033653602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.082811214,0.0005616075,0.0017890426,0.004453432,0.043112364,0.01791987,0.010367231,0.008855173,0.00022729245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071621616,0.000009735783,0.0010605376,0.00007359275,0.00001490815,0.0000773774,0.0015558244,0.0002857529,0.00004539093,0.9866471,0.00038095642,0.009841609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000138974865,0.000017014992,0.002005405,0.0003948144,0.00004234363,0.00012919282,0.0033151328,0.0017067178,0.00015897537,0.9786982,0.01348987,0.000028561704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05798042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10249558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05798042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01866433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025582647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24257201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319864237","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-16556-6_3","title":"Case Law of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Legal studies in international, european and comparative criminal law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.19744936376853237,"score_gpt":0.3609492391368419,"score_spread":0.16349987536830954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319864237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06006555,0.008227784,0.0021637396,0.031146036,0.0009614461,0.00022167958,0.001178016,0.00009901264,0.8959366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6319334,0.0036180113,0.0019872512,0.008573466,0.00027395086,0.00016894066,0.00034830294,0.000090864225,0.3530058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99543756,0.0004703977,0.00010343352,0.0005339854,0.0018541532,0.0016003964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997068,0.0009012384,0.00008413016,0.00013766426,0.001322925,0.00048610353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022591066,0.00066718383,0.00073203375,0.0028531214,0.022269992,0.0126760695,0.0036261105,0.010009062,0.014003324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009761173,0.00097601506,0.000790503,0.0035193812,0.0063375854,0.0023629565,0.0018649083,0.006686286,0.0009634284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003685243,0.00003220389,0.0011969865,0.000039066803,0.000024690355,0.00045242693,0.0013307964,0.0011911186,0.00015162572,0.92116994,0.06753831,0.006836106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001527106,0.00005486368,0.011217917,0.0005565928,0.00025071503,0.000488413,0.0057591284,0.009955594,0.0010000704,0.26095322,0.7093392,0.00027154738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9891328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99526453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10301112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10301112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14334233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7474015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320164552","doi":"10.7202/1095428ar","title":"L’angklung américain : spectre d’une rencontre coloniale oubliée","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de la Société québécoise de recherche en musique","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.08672196446232602,"score_gpt":0.39511851149038585,"score_spread":0.30839654702805985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320164552","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41501516,0.032567225,0.0024254224,0.0465497,0.00096600706,0.00002110724,0.00006961621,0.000047636993,0.5023382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9156761,0.0091805,0.0006444198,0.0026259024,0.00022504033,0.000015680733,0.000020701094,0.00005292586,0.071558654],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922395,0.00028551993,0.000013669999,0.0001396826,0.00012844648,0.0002087578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946374,0.00022017397,0.0000793876,0.000037825317,0.00011748872,0.00008143974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006795602,0.00030786396,0.00015739679,0.0004495099,0.00965654,0.0039647683,0.0003236956,0.0010425549,0.003724427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091304386,0.00018471728,0.0000843172,0.0008523189,0.014366812,0.0026766402,0.0023618462,0.002963519,0.00036178678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007143554,0.000035156627,0.004922253,0.00012361155,0.00000790682,0.0011442088,0.4869118,0.000087794186,0.0022355001,0.42751408,0.0175962,0.059350003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054984253,0.00002482762,0.008434189,0.00026201032,0.0000049183045,0.0004575432,0.058424454,0.00006708062,0.00059411343,0.010067785,0.92164123,0.000016364029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08078674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1679463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08078674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007002731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040926305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16063303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321499572","doi":"10.1017/s105383722200075x","title":"SMITH AT 300: THE DIGNITY OF TRADE","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Humanity; Butcher; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.058323617875863,"score_gpt":0.28764239699570987,"score_spread":0.22931877911984688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321499572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007208465,0.0024509048,0.00037775398,0.05574734,0.00067864533,0.000008240203,0.00006348451,0.000024517416,0.9334406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29089722,0.0021075367,0.00037521526,0.039157372,0.0005583705,0.000038627415,0.00006424051,0.00007423366,0.6667273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988469,0.00028096876,0.000027271191,0.00019351888,0.00032496394,0.00032643965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951243,0.00014011122,0.000033252396,0.00008994002,0.00010779728,0.00011641711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011171817,0.00025256138,0.00022832939,0.00036696106,0.008150361,0.0073442585,0.00058493135,0.006991248,0.029268343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033269562,0.0002194408,0.0001798091,0.000453845,0.0082957875,0.0052893963,0.0034013644,0.005181752,0.0044737817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019882928,0.000008582914,0.00024906942,0.000014708479,0.000002244601,0.00024829438,0.0047773356,0.000026981172,0.0001809563,0.88041574,0.104397684,0.009658511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056693643,0.000008651568,0.00048388497,0.00010893862,0.0000020819423,0.00019581984,0.0041482886,0.000050956103,0.00020484709,0.08888281,0.9058986,0.000009477771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024109624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041391294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029268343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030964348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004499728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09791237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321506114","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4311423","title":"Positivism and Pluralism in Canadian Aboriginal Law: Reading Caron v Alberta and the Marshall Trilogy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trilogy; Positivism; Legal positivism; Pluralism (philosophy); Reading (process); Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Comparative law; History; Philosophy of law; Art history","score_opus":0.008676929000587887,"score_gpt":0.29005914739815175,"score_spread":0.2813822183975639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321506114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17705248,0.017850595,0.0014692964,0.36469325,0.0016049689,0.00013339055,0.00023209387,0.000052732514,0.43691123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92463297,0.0037655337,0.0010505412,0.02525538,0.00037519337,0.00008357735,0.000051906536,0.00007559152,0.044709317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930227,0.0018129838,0.0001386765,0.00054138317,0.001320061,0.0031642178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98817575,0.006300887,0.00047593398,0.00031801374,0.002943366,0.0017861231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008514977,0.0008520433,0.00092574075,0.004125273,0.078270495,0.022434851,0.0058676023,0.013866942,0.0075642364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016545625,0.00088931416,0.00079196534,0.005889106,0.0753717,0.0068295095,0.007418226,0.018646628,0.00030708598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004193234,0.00004403982,0.0021282036,0.00010164571,0.000016585343,0.00045342717,0.28863344,0.00025988737,0.0001134207,0.6555036,0.043762255,0.008941523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053857202,0.000018418494,0.009955881,0.0008079578,0.00008233462,0.00016615137,0.62959695,0.00044472044,0.00023990478,0.14945675,0.20900886,0.00016822216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20872986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20872986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31888887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9177612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323244453","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4372318","title":"Preventive Justice? Domestic Violence Protection Orders and their Intersections with Family and Other Laws and Legal Systems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Domestic violence; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.015838868160404578,"score_gpt":0.2809895349307326,"score_spread":0.265150666770328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323244453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92880034,0.0021649154,0.0010932462,0.017806927,0.00005243789,0.000025221281,0.0002609917,0.000018332186,0.049777552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99879265,0.00026904847,0.00013962976,0.00013089772,0.000022453582,0.0000056610106,0.000020793357,0.000002968638,0.00061575434],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688894,0.0016827007,0.00007078647,0.00026413598,0.00033275416,0.00076065835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785872,0.011323696,0.0062788557,0.00072026846,0.0010183763,0.0020715964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021870877,0.00017969769,0.00039776595,0.0028431963,0.0032143153,0.008797735,0.0011777652,0.001800338,0.015418998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019407542,0.00038771427,0.00027946685,0.0036334137,0.006004967,0.006789858,0.002961001,0.0023616462,0.00039169937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020534579,0.0010992789,0.69600457,0.0000942641,0.000077253884,0.0004960902,0.03699917,0.00038940963,0.00016651784,0.21667483,0.002536085,0.04525726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025057509,0.0001068656,0.8090848,0.00029537283,0.00008676684,0.0004819597,0.111906104,0.0011037919,0.00022800559,0.067789115,0.008855225,0.0000369792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034064572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054837544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034064572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037067474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051340186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06773257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323337882","doi":"10.1017/9781846157370.007","title":"MS 32","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Art; Art history; Humanities; Computer science","score_opus":0.030529490274094278,"score_gpt":0.32812227820697887,"score_spread":0.2975927879328846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323337882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032378867,0.0012053308,0.00035940149,0.0024829989,0.003958969,0.00007916597,0.0010955202,0.0003337404,0.99016106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008294593,0.00021837102,0.00008319909,0.00058512756,0.00020511125,0.00001783776,0.0002459758,0.000110865854,0.99770397],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993358,0.000086461376,0.000026332438,0.00017065724,0.00025014253,0.00013057607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995166,0.000041481246,0.000024076495,0.00005381332,0.00021377909,0.0001502498],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000497608,0.0011136264,0.00048417752,0.0012793867,0.003919248,0.005773906,0.0011877798,0.0027278662,0.8122802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017365623,0.0004009811,0.0004861328,0.001057425,0.0007120547,0.0032364186,0.003534418,0.0023333847,0.6602383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021549124,0.0000089190235,0.00007750715,0.00006118148,0.000001137658,0.0001027664,0.00018294915,0.000017057151,0.0001660247,0.010809118,0.9522758,0.036276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011991598,0.0000031353259,0.00007535433,0.000022496204,2.8849547e-7,0.00004923722,0.00009168325,0.000006411222,0.000024169845,0.00031392157,0.9994106,0.000001566861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009496611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02458619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18771982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002227333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023574021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323340196","doi":"10.7202/1096885ar","title":"L’Acte de Québec de 1774 : relique du passé ou charte contemporaine ?","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.03198643506024592,"score_gpt":0.26824604900451904,"score_spread":0.2362596139442731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323340196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42125735,0.008610638,0.0008803903,0.033262894,0.00048578542,0.000047225345,0.00071754697,0.00002365612,0.5347146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9105013,0.002171088,0.0002967572,0.0018129067,0.000034340705,0.000016347005,0.00012418542,0.000015780635,0.08502742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990715,0.00012828757,0.000019546776,0.000110945635,0.00025210285,0.00041764084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990483,0.00013580757,0.00009757814,0.000044505152,0.00044576114,0.00022807303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008418065,0.000223944,0.00024297184,0.0012490668,0.0141311865,0.004358668,0.0009098307,0.0012938917,0.009154156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019971423,0.00016841893,0.00014632381,0.002041378,0.010166207,0.0015877087,0.0014575329,0.001987065,0.00040326812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010365724,0.000035095276,0.03213418,0.0001464961,0.00003122183,0.00076408405,0.17775589,0.00035665632,0.0005907673,0.69456136,0.04793833,0.045582317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001632402,0.000036840534,0.08819982,0.0005361169,0.00004133884,0.00018577598,0.12740143,0.00026843205,0.0006024994,0.008756455,0.773873,0.00008203479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98964065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062494323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062494323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07939485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45343018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323356148","doi":"10.32920/22227346","title":"Federation of Law Societies: Towards a Deeper Understanding of the Principles of Fundamental Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Duty; Political science; Privilege (computing); State (computer science); Charter; Sociology","score_opus":0.274470502093711,"score_gpt":0.3856891183702765,"score_spread":0.11121861627656549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323356148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.089231744,0.018252244,0.18875715,0.23158327,0.0016438676,0.00024759502,0.00008427971,0.0001515671,0.4700483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94708294,0.0027144237,0.032711994,0.008463739,0.0005572688,0.00020137853,0.00004120723,0.000049670438,0.008177471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876764,0.0067656795,0.0003976467,0.0012054354,0.0017530837,0.002201833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921572,0.0039841975,0.0008791537,0.0012647059,0.0009235903,0.0007911271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019398257,0.00051466905,0.00095977564,0.0029551676,0.014019708,0.015126502,0.00276354,0.013340636,0.0018535834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010754204,0.0008807611,0.0017197194,0.0019390141,0.046994176,0.020909153,0.008838837,0.014081411,0.00022391771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.988072e-7,0.0000043018294,0.00012270473,0.000004710275,0.0000010104278,0.000018756478,0.0019257074,0.00011272203,0.000012675183,0.99623066,0.0005299962,0.0010358386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053860226,0.000009342984,0.00053501397,0.000088711175,0.000003980003,0.000046880632,0.0027981468,0.0012102626,0.00004134322,0.9607713,0.034477234,0.000012317823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038374122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02630546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038374122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01435655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024312234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1041646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323356149","doi":"10.32920/22227346.v1","title":"Federation of Law Societies: Towards a Deeper Understanding of the Principles of Fundamental Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Jurisprudence; Duty; Political science; Privilege (computing); Charter; State (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.274470502093711,"score_gpt":0.3856891183702765,"score_spread":0.11121861627656549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323356149","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.089231744,0.018252244,0.18875715,0.23158327,0.0016438676,0.00024759502,0.00008427971,0.0001515671,0.4700483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94708294,0.0027144237,0.032711994,0.008463739,0.0005572688,0.00020137853,0.00004120723,0.000049670438,0.008177471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876764,0.0067656795,0.0003976467,0.0012054354,0.0017530837,0.002201833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921572,0.0039841975,0.0008791537,0.0012647059,0.0009235903,0.0007911271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019398257,0.00051466905,0.00095977564,0.0029551676,0.014019708,0.015126502,0.00276354,0.013340636,0.0018535834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010754204,0.0008807611,0.0017197194,0.0019390141,0.046994176,0.020909153,0.008838837,0.014081411,0.00022391771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.988072e-7,0.0000043018294,0.00012270473,0.000004710275,0.0000010104278,0.000018756478,0.0019257074,0.00011272203,0.000012675183,0.99623066,0.0005299962,0.0010358386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053860226,0.000009342984,0.00053501397,0.000088711175,0.000003980003,0.000046880632,0.0027981468,0.0012102626,0.00004134322,0.9607713,0.034477234,0.000012317823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038374122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02630546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038374122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01435655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024312234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1041646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323875403","doi":"10.1017/9781846158148.009","title":"Letters E and F","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Theology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01901822128043861,"score_gpt":0.2989637439986583,"score_spread":0.2799455227182197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323875403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000369607,0.013457673,0.00037908566,0.03220413,0.029819118,0.000043760865,0.0010127043,0.00026697584,0.92244697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015750439,0.0023905267,0.00010254167,0.005160618,0.0016453676,0.0000277387,0.00026345847,0.00010932871,0.98872536],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864334,0.00020629216,0.00009935542,0.00033491742,0.0004728212,0.00024314552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985378,0.0003083698,0.00006919815,0.00018960627,0.0005826916,0.000312452],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095315155,0.0010532782,0.00088558753,0.0018789566,0.005181792,0.008442517,0.0016285954,0.00476758,0.68576026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006616678,0.0006150072,0.0007705986,0.00282415,0.0017189697,0.004603461,0.003541561,0.0038768728,0.48102355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012115557,0.0000039741544,0.000049365397,0.00004511644,0.0000011034776,0.00005716447,0.00010929738,0.000010165522,0.000030776366,0.0043577575,0.97573733,0.019585887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014457793,0.000002012445,0.00011976974,0.000070754846,3.76796e-7,0.000037895028,0.0001480973,0.0000053277436,0.000011321822,0.0004957933,0.99910516,0.0000020696623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020921608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042973686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31423974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004146472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003685844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44822484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323875522","doi":"10.1017/9781846158148.008","title":"Letters C and D","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01895771130029139,"score_gpt":0.2978938564494604,"score_spread":0.27893614514916903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323875522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027753157,0.0020558874,0.00017991096,0.011070562,0.013334982,0.000079347476,0.001016088,0.00026521648,0.97172046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00054971507,0.00027709527,0.00004281587,0.0018206987,0.0003852833,0.000016253784,0.00018844446,0.000056977762,0.9966627],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869174,0.00014702385,0.000076365075,0.0003244462,0.00047761828,0.00028284185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873,0.0001667315,0.000039429677,0.00017366455,0.0005610635,0.00032910862],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000817422,0.0011367616,0.0006961152,0.0012834668,0.004586299,0.00870414,0.0014351215,0.0050185136,0.79749435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004193119,0.000594504,0.0008693264,0.0016354355,0.0011136386,0.0031043964,0.0027355915,0.0034964187,0.66928625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015542384,0.0000069194753,0.00004822211,0.000030648247,9.855387e-7,0.000037791648,0.000032083753,0.0000148031195,0.000045672547,0.0029709039,0.98205996,0.0147364335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027021467,0.0000039443094,0.000113048074,0.000030424007,3.7563618e-7,0.000019935604,0.00006567501,0.0000072503926,0.000016513979,0.0003107134,0.9994276,0.0000018790893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018931206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04511361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20250565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037456502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046498524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2888497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327653302","doi":"10.7202/1097341ar","title":"Tenir lieu de parent au Québec : deux poids, deux mesures ?","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02253886009972034,"score_gpt":0.30334034490624834,"score_spread":0.280801484806528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327653302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49126625,0.0275683,0.00597446,0.16028528,0.0018168929,0.00014557136,0.0005978731,0.000109907975,0.31223547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9381755,0.004796149,0.0010456779,0.004906629,0.00009507563,0.000042052656,0.00006458699,0.000032331012,0.050841983],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818724,0.0006521585,0.00004318905,0.00020308439,0.0004318969,0.0004823988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735236,0.00068117597,0.00024339624,0.00012827817,0.0010675549,0.0005272547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022889986,0.00034173686,0.00037911467,0.00089600263,0.017332153,0.0054176087,0.0011422003,0.0015841307,0.008218026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056188344,0.00019994062,0.00017256399,0.001704054,0.012438098,0.0027286496,0.0021619177,0.0029046366,0.00039727672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078133526,0.0000331607,0.028996302,0.00024206427,0.000031750562,0.0020132454,0.61921763,0.00014645372,0.0007460479,0.2384825,0.03713913,0.072873585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011193543,0.000037883234,0.051650915,0.0009372886,0.00005536021,0.0008088461,0.57964534,0.00024753908,0.0006685972,0.009467064,0.3563684,0.00010150278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9688994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9842493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040010255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040010255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04588341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29029608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327653802","doi":"10.7202/1097336ar","title":"Do Children’s “Best Interests” Matter When Tracing Their Filiation in Quebec Civil Law ?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Context (archaeology); Scholarship; Best interests; Discretion; Family law; Political science; Negotiation; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.016735812830439404,"score_gpt":0.2675358642378865,"score_spread":0.2508000514074471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327653802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49265423,0.018264191,0.0037353262,0.16789725,0.00055463624,0.0000876901,0.00038490735,0.00004592782,0.3163758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811048,0.0016922981,0.000492169,0.005493242,0.000038500126,0.00002170787,0.000035189216,0.000015544603,0.011106531],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99340713,0.0023657393,0.00013239293,0.00044886602,0.0012300061,0.0024157867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98634976,0.008412215,0.00088576286,0.00039817498,0.0029802085,0.0009738728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010225213,0.00027214503,0.000376707,0.00216282,0.017568782,0.009535586,0.002092243,0.0035390782,0.0048694825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023426428,0.00028062135,0.00025872127,0.0025185512,0.019825848,0.00559447,0.0029345765,0.0048683393,0.00022791787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000422904,0.000033078646,0.039210748,0.0001477094,0.000021884407,0.0014928809,0.48717672,0.0002355676,0.000328124,0.38750598,0.026496664,0.05730844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014157386,0.000041245217,0.1066306,0.0014747216,0.00005106494,0.00069115014,0.5351102,0.00048890564,0.0008382376,0.025493748,0.32902363,0.00014235565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9604924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9856595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0891081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0891081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04913326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6465275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327653806","doi":"10.7202/1097342ar","title":"Regards croisés sur l’union de fait en droit québécois","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015207447031241838,"score_gpt":0.2658322646091179,"score_spread":0.2506248175778761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327653806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4932946,0.0088638095,0.0015613567,0.035433866,0.00043592227,0.00007964046,0.00025835028,0.0000241838,0.46004826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8852886,0.0018575104,0.0002593698,0.0047144312,0.00006418959,0.00003594794,0.00005474396,0.000019109038,0.10770611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775934,0.0005379266,0.00004642627,0.0002355527,0.0004886417,0.0009321204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980179,0.0007960895,0.00019831605,0.000081940605,0.0005629132,0.0003429131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021386712,0.00033793156,0.0003321825,0.0014804727,0.020759426,0.00532622,0.0011431681,0.0034269616,0.009829614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003391614,0.0002800865,0.00025812944,0.0020349438,0.011618922,0.001636011,0.002834579,0.0038564077,0.0003446984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004898904,0.000037505866,0.010115576,0.0001594783,0.000026833877,0.0012740314,0.3531702,0.00037090053,0.001040842,0.5922353,0.021712905,0.019807402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001639619,0.000038334205,0.040568154,0.0006991279,0.000040437553,0.00027604736,0.28363138,0.0003027277,0.0006883651,0.010598855,0.66304916,0.00009099127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9697861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9876589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05332401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05332401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040911432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38689458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W435668673","doi":"10.71781/2265","title":"La règle prétorienne en droit français et canadien : étude de droit comparé","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Jurisprudence; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.006630580257234819,"score_gpt":0.2058975711718948,"score_spread":0.19926699091466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W435668673","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37707376,0.012947663,0.0023909633,0.010092458,0.0002591437,0.000062218875,0.00040686998,0.000030371011,0.5967365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975464,0.0017220118,0.00049318944,0.0007859206,0.000046406232,0.00006330851,0.000098301316,0.000025528456,0.021301344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906607,0.0045856372,0.00022546372,0.00097587996,0.0021183984,0.0014338504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902947,0.0056841313,0.0010406141,0.0007402445,0.001738621,0.0005016733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077482676,0.00031932443,0.0005940877,0.008054765,0.012211244,0.013548702,0.0014976498,0.0018983786,0.012007832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017305836,0.00025760185,0.00040040968,0.014668264,0.016534805,0.0072549707,0.007456813,0.0026694427,0.00057850784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053364925,0.000027943375,0.0066544013,0.00015588921,0.000040061746,0.00016292055,0.1775047,0.00019077337,0.00016704817,0.7849541,0.0032625806,0.026826242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024049272,0.00013034807,0.07005265,0.0008796784,0.000092794864,0.00026470315,0.45935485,0.00041864833,0.00083849323,0.09577039,0.3720573,0.00011614822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25064996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3716775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7493501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030075233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010821363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49838203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361243094","doi":"10.1017/s0008423923000197","title":"Beyond the Constitutional Architecture:<i>An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families</i>at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Waterloo","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitutionality; Law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Constitution; Constitutional court; Indigenous; Expansive; Sociology","score_opus":0.019860049926325313,"score_gpt":0.2722495267594933,"score_spread":0.25238947683316804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361243094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14887516,0.0068270653,0.0043842145,0.16321161,0.0008174048,0.00014289339,0.00042190994,0.00007496191,0.6752447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96088326,0.0011681652,0.0013876765,0.013185604,0.00013664353,0.000032949407,0.000045746114,0.00002036506,0.023139557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99147296,0.0016784802,0.00022165861,0.0007886604,0.0023742507,0.0034640438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932682,0.002835039,0.00026336094,0.00028590066,0.002589921,0.0007575841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070186947,0.00028086468,0.00047601698,0.0012968081,0.028938537,0.015417101,0.002249286,0.0066367607,0.002963291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009762768,0.0003688406,0.00045466554,0.0017247489,0.031005943,0.002801657,0.0029594374,0.010369101,0.000170348],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006232428,0.0000052332516,0.00065009017,0.000011967602,0.0000044335693,0.00016668801,0.007845063,0.0001832479,0.00015222545,0.9839426,0.0051170727,0.0019150866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006344917,0.000048815433,0.015284833,0.00093744305,0.00021004998,0.0003296483,0.04527338,0.0032833635,0.0026166248,0.2973909,0.63423175,0.0003297429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9812169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9892524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10439671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10439671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17361191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7574547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365512570","doi":"10.1177/1037969x231170419","title":"The role of a First Nations Voice for delegated legislation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternative Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Parliament; Legislation; Scrutiny; Law; Indigenous; Political science; Project commissioning; Order (exchange); Public administration; Law and economics; Business; Publishing; Legislature; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.038757127700344465,"score_gpt":0.3434692466636243,"score_spread":0.3047121189632798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365512570","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11882603,0.002577128,0.01127389,0.039370798,0.00077252183,0.000082505765,0.000014892955,0.00005254959,0.82702965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9705199,0.0003614522,0.0017048077,0.0037831112,0.00012950381,0.000056544948,0.0000061161213,0.000023773198,0.023414897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97793955,0.01331582,0.0004373676,0.0017009214,0.003196152,0.003410199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869221,0.007920583,0.00094131305,0.0009111859,0.0016464503,0.001658351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016624384,0.00029699955,0.0003528451,0.0012597325,0.011689714,0.0132656405,0.001378251,0.005943272,0.0058932467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01906179,0.00028687212,0.00056236406,0.0005442475,0.018683031,0.007033545,0.007841515,0.0062742713,0.0005923423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018591658,0.00001507055,0.0011846256,0.000050113482,0.000005321207,0.0004250897,0.032649253,0.00011099792,0.00046617072,0.9549495,0.001625571,0.00849973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060300557,0.00027108233,0.008756828,0.001742828,0.000082188744,0.0017818023,0.10634861,0.002627953,0.0032425793,0.23794366,0.63697624,0.00016597423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014821883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027988931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016624384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067861388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010912699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087919176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366809764","doi":"10.1353/rss.2009.0013","title":"Marriage and Morals Revisited","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Georgian; Portrait; History; Meaning (existential); Modernism (music); Period (music); Art history; Art; Literature; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.04160214193051547,"score_gpt":0.3350150180156303,"score_spread":0.2934128760851148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366809764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065039624,0.18958536,0.00042305788,0.25170267,0.008441733,0.000012907908,0.00007705353,0.00005869587,0.54319465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30362412,0.077004395,0.00035981712,0.077490225,0.009586992,0.000058611982,0.0000840314,0.00022995111,0.53156185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979539,0.0009791566,0.00004895505,0.00029324164,0.00042736306,0.00029738666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995141,0.00014522151,0.000045328386,0.00003433687,0.00010030805,0.00016072577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013612347,0.00048423893,0.0004181195,0.00095366803,0.009033631,0.007725761,0.00083999,0.0054288195,0.02561466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025212273,0.0003339473,0.00040195935,0.0010793508,0.015878605,0.006088333,0.003982811,0.00820021,0.005783541],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023215476,0.0000132356545,0.0002071815,0.000112757516,0.0000040650443,0.00030354786,0.017414972,0.00003967424,0.00009471133,0.5325847,0.42315137,0.026050555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003881134,0.000007418554,0.00048605673,0.0002224641,0.0000012126324,0.00016020295,0.0065586595,0.000014663068,0.000033345805,0.023705106,0.9688007,0.0000061689184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025162531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05112445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02561466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010816224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037200912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085689545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366809791","doi":"10.1353/rss.2003.0009","title":"Griffin Barry","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Griffin; Memoir; Wife; Politics; Greenwich; Brother; Art history; History; Classics; Art; Sociology; Law; Theology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.04320242250572444,"score_gpt":0.3226875889562434,"score_spread":0.27948516645051896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366809791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030674433,0.17805287,0.0003406525,0.03170837,0.032556333,0.000082626815,0.0010644951,0.00041366986,0.75547427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014103579,0.040212296,0.00018222716,0.008666291,0.0032725758,0.00003768508,0.0003520045,0.00017325816,0.9456933],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991406,0.0000936099,0.00004333275,0.00020571928,0.00041125657,0.000105388055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847573,0.00029079264,0.00008860601,0.000117971395,0.00065164384,0.0003752582],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006447487,0.0011261913,0.0006344392,0.002182976,0.0014847522,0.0039475756,0.0010629882,0.0025986815,0.4376259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003270429,0.00046859466,0.00041581332,0.0020488892,0.0007459235,0.0027464072,0.0018413757,0.0022967008,0.30384985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004323246,0.0000042324805,0.000020064708,0.00010622118,8.102681e-7,0.000022907361,0.000034516655,0.000008632677,0.00003165886,0.0010699463,0.9720429,0.026653755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.967593e-7,0.0000013203847,0.00003899333,0.00013146063,5.498411e-7,0.00002447792,0.000023564828,0.0000017428413,0.000008682767,0.00012123248,0.99964607,0.0000012146102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01573389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036361776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4376259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034601681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038342206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80215836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367159149","doi":"10.7202/1078354ar","title":"Michael ASCH, Home and Native Land: Aboriginal Rights and The Canadian Constitution, Toronto, Methuen, 1984. 156 pages, $9.95 (paper)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Culture","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01321250374980118,"score_gpt":0.2904102434519969,"score_spread":0.27719773970219574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367159149","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000511573,0.8429026,0.00046061896,0.053072568,0.0053543355,0.000050873357,0.0014073437,0.0001356134,0.096104555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011466012,0.6615916,0.0012602767,0.006301371,0.0028563654,0.00006647962,0.001102029,0.00014732574,0.31520855],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991922,0.00010903374,0.000040205792,0.000053635104,0.00047854168,0.00012627753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991881,0.00021116568,0.000089797635,0.000023850233,0.0003187242,0.00016828773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010990315,0.0015816258,0.00067831425,0.0032687073,0.004883941,0.003517661,0.001666952,0.0031743918,0.07637547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002091159,0.0008858244,0.00033768103,0.0077414806,0.0026597993,0.0052608326,0.0014495538,0.0025212467,0.023346528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001259504,0.000003990345,0.00014229873,0.00017852991,0.0000038471508,0.00002901763,0.0005623903,0.000027926666,0.000054957713,0.0032788424,0.97492355,0.020782162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067032356,0.0000033461645,0.0037347558,0.0004618947,0.000011099722,0.000050326413,0.0013800443,0.000026991247,0.00007171239,0.0027812095,0.99145633,0.00001576462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85518074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9536263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14481926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019760612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016180145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29134423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367159187","doi":"10.7202/1078343ar","title":"Jack GOODY, The Development of Family and Marriage in Europe, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1983. 308 pages, U.S. $39.50 (cloth), U.S. $12.95 (paper)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Culture","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.03578019191070902,"score_gpt":0.25881070232615583,"score_spread":0.2230305104154468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367159187","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033370595,0.9479824,0.000735961,0.023907073,0.0029378266,0.000028243347,0.00034892894,0.00006491366,0.023660917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007665891,0.89017123,0.0014618294,0.0055532483,0.0022844987,0.00006275188,0.00045396798,0.00011650214,0.09223016],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991806,0.00022395706,0.00008580907,0.000116114395,0.00028962578,0.00010387425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989384,0.00044362334,0.000121016856,0.000030244666,0.0002715626,0.0001953034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016882529,0.0018869083,0.001099442,0.0032857554,0.0019663312,0.002977639,0.0014330496,0.0028587366,0.033834558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025390524,0.0011541734,0.0004756958,0.004910184,0.0025047688,0.009296296,0.0017018572,0.0033783317,0.018568385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003092342,0.000017442515,0.00035731774,0.0004966847,0.000013937095,0.000065693464,0.0007239039,0.00008099213,0.000071756076,0.008741151,0.9227673,0.06663288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001953551,0.000018236748,0.008166171,0.0016829214,0.0000169615,0.00032789554,0.0018226029,0.00007162002,0.00012911734,0.01860496,0.9691032,0.00003659005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06039188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1402431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06039188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031933922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039164103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12008071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367395453","doi":"10.29173/cjfy29954","title":"Divorce, Treaty, and Expulsion in B.W. Powe's \"The Unsaid Passing\"","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Family and Youth / Le Journal Canadien de Famille et de la Jeunesse","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unsaid; Aside; Poetry; Reading (process); Treaty; Politics; Sociology; Law; Literature; Political science; Art; Social science","score_opus":0.0261268222902799,"score_gpt":0.2885158420070179,"score_spread":0.262389019716738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367395453","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27676368,0.025577916,0.003999584,0.15985334,0.0024445432,0.00010550721,0.00014415695,0.00007379667,0.5310375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9322399,0.003325517,0.00045132753,0.0028340302,0.000113864975,0.000023316217,0.000016233984,0.000032458134,0.060963243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990189,0.00034390186,0.000017951023,0.00006317501,0.00031085956,0.0002452116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993,0.0002541877,0.00006659223,0.000028013696,0.00017764821,0.0001735704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013070368,0.000225003,0.00023522956,0.00081541535,0.02012514,0.0048258062,0.0006359851,0.001070493,0.002065198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004562701,0.00016524561,0.00016564994,0.0010640763,0.021107558,0.0023164183,0.0020395778,0.004235185,0.00016646681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031807816,0.000017940973,0.000824522,0.0000332386,0.0000040433624,0.0005775323,0.42218044,0.00008204889,0.00019279166,0.519434,0.04036618,0.01625551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010796213,0.000017792716,0.0051722135,0.00018855353,0.000008399587,0.00054258975,0.26615074,0.0001414368,0.00034902903,0.026520818,0.7008625,0.000035175224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6463023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7249518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6463023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016025523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01327768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71156144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372232466","doi":"10.2307/jj.2711607.23","title":"Church and Cult in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cult; History; Ancient history","score_opus":0.0461393095044684,"score_gpt":0.28609091655891744,"score_spread":0.23995160705444904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372232466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07713237,0.019700069,0.0002723804,0.042138886,0.0013129262,0.000058523055,0.00040504793,0.000047423935,0.85893244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4971272,0.0073764166,0.00042223517,0.005179166,0.00013794187,0.000036623947,0.00014143101,0.00007842732,0.48950055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830365,0.00022070168,0.000022816192,0.00010430231,0.0003266491,0.0010217519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985098,0.00019575017,0.000048277583,0.000041650597,0.00037495102,0.0008295302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000991546,0.0003850038,0.00056021445,0.0018119885,0.044082183,0.011263412,0.0019436327,0.002879784,0.032125458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002272017,0.0004200297,0.0003422913,0.0041149952,0.008349767,0.0019026055,0.0034790838,0.0058047716,0.001276257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004524405,0.000058905465,0.003581254,0.0000794601,0.00001149238,0.00041293417,0.030300746,0.00031792998,0.00010778567,0.7920681,0.1338065,0.039209697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019057214,0.000012299368,0.010871767,0.00028063267,0.000012913373,0.00010259552,0.048603587,0.000288562,0.000106106745,0.016541686,0.9231226,0.000038160088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99564445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16169916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16169916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21922547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9723101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372348573","doi":"10.55221/1940-5537.1159","title":"Review of C.S. Lewis and Bede Griffiths: Chief Companions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sehnsucht The C S Lewis Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Editor in chief; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.05455836190121451,"score_gpt":0.34879145438850895,"score_spread":0.29423309248729446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372348573","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000048049587,0.9158964,0.000096000476,0.037691206,0.042692136,0.000018470539,0.00009050599,0.00001656726,0.0034506705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012788385,0.90995455,0.00020888002,0.038285967,0.038390208,0.00006188453,0.00024965097,0.000032514745,0.011537564],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746156,0.0006002167,0.00033433927,0.00036399308,0.00108445,0.00015538526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986304,0.0037047185,0.0011256014,0.0003639136,0.0070983707,0.0014034663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041530873,0.0013442758,0.0021763875,0.0061799088,0.0011455187,0.0035573926,0.0025113847,0.0036743132,0.022727266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02589195,0.0007203728,0.0007529265,0.006638402,0.0018597435,0.003995161,0.002532454,0.004691309,0.015061412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011617978,0.000004871559,0.000043129156,0.0017854704,0.000012684556,0.000041006428,0.000044654833,0.000014924353,0.0000228366,0.000475283,0.94984525,0.04769835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067206856,0.000007477288,0.000233567,0.0043981913,0.000017312714,0.00023727435,0.00006465998,0.000008257397,0.0000167288,0.00036217095,0.99463767,0.000010001252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008619462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013176681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022727266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003178633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009022871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076030314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377260870","doi":"10.1515/9780773569195","title":"A Seat at the Table","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Computer science; Database","score_opus":0.02432160594546224,"score_gpt":0.24423507148598111,"score_spread":0.21991346554051888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377260870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003096144,0.0017855965,0.0006062179,0.010803493,0.0049074483,0.00004773525,0.00015589071,0.00014554661,0.9812385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025684177,0.0006911072,0.00024966028,0.0046772645,0.00028508267,0.0000118158405,0.000060704842,0.00007615661,0.99137986],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891925,0.00010136748,0.000020341822,0.00012149061,0.0005344787,0.0003031265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991611,0.00010125423,0.000011637181,0.000067782974,0.00037010456,0.00028814704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006669238,0.00072253955,0.0005705495,0.0010367428,0.008940527,0.00864262,0.0011061908,0.0040374026,0.21843627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022811594,0.00044860135,0.0006401766,0.0009706297,0.0028731686,0.0075178784,0.0029184641,0.0077011036,0.099545434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006028475,0.000012197463,0.00003734784,0.000016797507,7.4370377e-7,0.00004490229,0.0004657085,0.000026174666,0.00009985529,0.09218823,0.88586795,0.021233954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018827674,0.000004008018,0.00005458294,0.000045748802,6.070849e-7,0.000025050329,0.0003841078,0.000014949208,0.000022841998,0.0037953581,0.9956475,0.0000034369737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16142824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3203978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21843627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067796716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010594929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7307421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377263127","doi":"10.1515/9780773572966-013","title":"Toronto Diocesan Regulations, 1842","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.023773654045040296,"score_gpt":0.2490477140582921,"score_spread":0.2252740600132518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377263127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034492374,0.01137248,0.00024047954,0.0043648793,0.0012411169,0.000062604224,0.004441608,0.00010416901,0.9747234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010020376,0.0017451706,0.00010486242,0.00057085697,0.00006459437,0.000032995355,0.00036056447,0.00003436764,0.9870663],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991059,0.00006482953,0.00003774116,0.00015339494,0.00039441657,0.00024368515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959797,0.000059988877,0.000030108547,0.000056481746,0.00020514014,0.000050193667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045132375,0.00080797425,0.00031486453,0.0015214462,0.006205646,0.0042059766,0.0010102821,0.0022875727,0.075906046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016571782,0.0006697892,0.00027329713,0.0032937434,0.0015997499,0.0011267001,0.0014509514,0.0027463862,0.011678301],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038920698,0.000020638892,0.0007699073,0.00013160273,0.000005997834,0.00019904973,0.002223525,0.00016745563,0.00023624173,0.18752918,0.7734241,0.035253536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024390852,0.0000029750875,0.001339957,0.000043380438,0.0000018258256,0.000018088109,0.00021159921,0.000012977557,0.00007230559,0.0010913864,0.9971981,0.000004915266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77191806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91803217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22808194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019205203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019576717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45885026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377263133","doi":"10.1515/9780773571495","title":"The Most Dangerous Branch","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.02053553296508497,"score_gpt":0.24115200632997252,"score_spread":0.22061647336488754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377263133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015087413,0.022115035,0.0013678693,0.050171282,0.00500346,0.000023341649,0.0001037328,0.00010779778,0.9195987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034789197,0.014169049,0.0013382995,0.037643068,0.0018194007,0.000027363487,0.00019571764,0.00021596474,0.9098021],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876416,0.00016509384,0.00002005977,0.00010693807,0.0006709129,0.00027291788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987897,0.00022978894,0.000034683486,0.000095392454,0.0005563315,0.0002940694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074237207,0.00057549303,0.00040348634,0.0014547195,0.007435274,0.007326682,0.0008971624,0.00228318,0.0416483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002063302,0.00024148269,0.0003860864,0.0014236443,0.008704461,0.0050776037,0.002691572,0.0060154162,0.0097686425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013544318,0.0000178815,0.0002345131,0.00007046251,0.0000033491688,0.00009980437,0.002727606,0.00005260048,0.00018110142,0.30768195,0.6277984,0.061118778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019868644,0.0000038969606,0.00021492717,0.00011042137,0.0000016986806,0.00006688407,0.00073952315,0.00003457035,0.000035331144,0.01876464,0.9800218,0.00000432381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15088618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29520747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15088618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009345046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012175463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30001587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378084134","doi":"10.22215/cjcr.v9i1.4039","title":"La Discrimination À L’égard Des Enfants Autochtones Au Québec : Regard Sur L’application Indifférenciée De La Loi Sur La Protection De La Jeunesse","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Children s Rights / Revue canadienne des droits des enfants","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Political science; Ethnology; Art","score_opus":0.017248586792371883,"score_gpt":0.2572857259925419,"score_spread":0.24003713920017003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378084134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9142675,0.0021379946,0.00064964045,0.010053465,0.000074785676,0.000029272445,0.000060375114,0.000008911489,0.07271803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922822,0.0006852481,0.00016249006,0.0004276758,0.000004954029,0.000009904492,0.000012118352,0.0000021066314,0.006413244],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877435,0.0003571083,0.000028286242,0.00008723234,0.0002912788,0.00046174414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784005,0.00067370734,0.00023777965,0.00008759528,0.0007966091,0.00036426354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017171452,0.00021002664,0.00018655686,0.00080629415,0.008458994,0.0028314672,0.00081255275,0.00071472075,0.0028652425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034161715,0.00013764335,0.00017011716,0.0009694966,0.006955455,0.00082038186,0.0019339757,0.0015122591,0.00009518318],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007230026,0.00007407561,0.18120416,0.00019824853,0.00003629042,0.001396232,0.6050687,0.0004541738,0.0017424056,0.1023082,0.0050433706,0.102401905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012297274,0.00010349662,0.41108826,0.0006615523,0.000047329377,0.00039509367,0.49157923,0.0005177541,0.0012785045,0.004079674,0.09015608,0.00008070647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97270566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98786235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032142777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032142777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029778158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23321325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378383770","doi":"10.1515/9780773597549-008","title":"The Aboriginal Charter of Rights: The Royal Proclamation of 1763 and the Constitution of Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proclamation; Charter; Constitution; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.014854551540961674,"score_gpt":0.22883200476054055,"score_spread":0.21397745321957887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378383770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015189164,0.03477254,0.00091479684,0.034434352,0.0016028403,0.00008839749,0.00028509548,0.00003520528,0.91267765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42435452,0.012774661,0.0016586891,0.016015818,0.0006056436,0.00012744241,0.00013122968,0.00013653655,0.54419535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956664,0.0007370559,0.00008615836,0.00039424302,0.001292747,0.001823302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867564,0.0003859304,0.000074126554,0.000098794364,0.00053193676,0.00023349715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002497746,0.00069888146,0.00060487335,0.0013535732,0.020948628,0.0085327085,0.0019561322,0.007718574,0.007719381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00536916,0.00065214495,0.0004112645,0.002630026,0.030990798,0.0027164216,0.0029333853,0.009423462,0.0008028865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015389804,0.0000075701396,0.00014616626,0.000043834025,0.000004895865,0.00008216866,0.017516691,0.0001600936,0.000070127724,0.9325639,0.042925637,0.0064635687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017145661,0.000013320469,0.0020419061,0.00041838718,0.000019294086,0.00008808051,0.00906459,0.00013057329,0.00017372413,0.097972885,0.8899912,0.000068896916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9844403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99218035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09213137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09213137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1870014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.668463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379209154","doi":"10.1007/s10691-023-09534-9","title":"Correction: Compromise on Parenting and Family Violence? Reforms to Canada’s Divorce Act","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Public international law; Political science; Political philosophy; Human rights; Law; Family law; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology; International law; Politics","score_opus":0.0487212535823784,"score_gpt":0.3319946481442398,"score_spread":0.2832733945618614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379209154","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011259743,0.0020132323,0.0002359097,0.6718319,0.31687722,0.00006554338,0.0013423277,0.00016104238,0.0063468055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045379862,0.007218209,0.0010343759,0.6551138,0.12065698,0.00035353727,0.0006217798,0.00035465334,0.1692668],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99225956,0.0007539578,0.0009787244,0.0010664813,0.0025365758,0.0024047557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9564812,0.011592355,0.0017770773,0.001879574,0.023996666,0.004273183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00530629,0.0017183601,0.003687979,0.0032646116,0.020296855,0.007817028,0.008892234,0.057148736,0.024256738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07925889,0.001996005,0.0019560533,0.0048223888,0.007149295,0.0027579241,0.0034612552,0.051429816,0.0063854097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013878779,0.0000044745157,0.00019971523,0.000040613246,0.000011927366,0.0003238151,0.00021938569,0.000046535748,0.000010874148,0.001236636,0.9964669,0.0014252051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008699837,0.000014596194,0.004793605,0.00084150047,0.000091952315,0.000752325,0.0028406612,0.00072781526,0.000251079,0.002638704,0.9868095,0.00015117553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83354694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8750445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16645306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053364053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.104565874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3871851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379804863","doi":"10.1353/fro.2013.a520039","title":"The Question of Muslim Women’s Rights and the Ontario Shari’ah Tribunals: Examining Liberal Claims","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers A Journal of Women Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Arbitration; Faith; Islam; Political science; Oppression; Sociology; Afghan; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Gender studies; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.026450436376571265,"score_gpt":0.29532706188780783,"score_spread":0.2688766255112366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379804863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46053824,0.019363359,0.00037830937,0.10885555,0.0004336412,0.000125967,0.00027246212,0.000009998732,0.4100225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96021587,0.005862492,0.0001941373,0.004455141,0.0001938143,0.000042755077,0.000040622897,0.000009396819,0.028985858],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971181,0.00061683584,0.00006717356,0.00015692193,0.0009814443,0.0010594853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953762,0.0024181895,0.0006058639,0.0001596337,0.0008122737,0.0006278779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029157405,0.00024125347,0.0002978116,0.0014944203,0.023273036,0.008035689,0.001812689,0.0034330217,0.0057808002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044382443,0.00028964924,0.00021211458,0.0027979212,0.036444906,0.0024873707,0.0038876957,0.0022721912,0.00024575813],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008753068,0.000043462438,0.012716403,0.0003574238,0.000012083202,0.0014562975,0.6597228,0.00010480368,0.0007510664,0.27106762,0.025320107,0.028360402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000147915935,0.000024318353,0.04029414,0.0005581381,0.00001561629,0.00015579404,0.5383997,0.00011544697,0.00027987783,0.0135281,0.40657035,0.000043686625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9287164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97566706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09103813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09103813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0763321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6605309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379931748","doi":"10.1353/cul.2018.a706915","title":"Pornocratic Fantasy and the Contractarian Conception of Sexual Exchange","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cultural Critique","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subordination (linguistics); Autonomy; Property (philosophy); Power (physics); Criticism; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03789863533024792,"score_gpt":0.3565990926645255,"score_spread":0.3187004573342776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379931748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022384917,0.009760682,0.025428105,0.03942284,0.0005581135,0.000058355374,0.00005187637,0.000042119034,0.90229297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92549235,0.004828333,0.0036025748,0.007267047,0.00048662064,0.00014611935,0.000046945064,0.00006524629,0.0580647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99311465,0.0047742357,0.00012972037,0.0004609125,0.0010235303,0.0004968974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766445,0.0012589914,0.00025988685,0.00028899746,0.0002599699,0.00026772593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004953873,0.0005688903,0.0003921092,0.0012264041,0.0053252825,0.008035156,0.0012444082,0.0038554752,0.0074945465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050559957,0.00031654222,0.0004161885,0.0015286759,0.060950257,0.010997175,0.0057113585,0.0058222115,0.00083851384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024834478,0.0000027642684,0.000021758047,0.0000048255697,4.2074294e-7,0.000024348017,0.0023350883,0.000017748514,0.000007430083,0.9963486,0.00048906606,0.0007454751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015923952,0.000018261218,0.00021398376,0.00013056723,0.0000029113642,0.00042620147,0.005568781,0.0003213058,0.00007322957,0.83848107,0.1547347,0.000012972861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040488695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024141448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008035156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051176557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028967948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03713137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380228146","doi":"10.1515/9780228003076-010","title":"“Our Deep and Sincere Appreciation … for Your Kindness to Us”: A Japanese Canadian Family and the Administrative State","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kindness; State (computer science); Psychology; Political science; Law; Psychoanalysis; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.046562175609499844,"score_gpt":0.26850835917315746,"score_spread":0.2219461835636576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380228146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09064647,0.021646336,0.0010648456,0.14330664,0.0028416826,0.000080287486,0.0002101035,0.0000849512,0.7401187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.501581,0.0076429425,0.0011624198,0.013082769,0.00019476727,0.000059215537,0.00007321354,0.00012432989,0.47607937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986626,0.00023980164,0.00001864373,0.00009288684,0.00021109568,0.0007749286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991061,0.00010897476,0.000032099568,0.000025074092,0.00034891866,0.00037873807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014940924,0.0006842754,0.0003578504,0.0010563758,0.051690057,0.008979779,0.0013929085,0.0031291947,0.007291355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016060178,0.0005625013,0.0003536012,0.0028599382,0.022741199,0.0040555354,0.0027902473,0.005634621,0.0007595131],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000386078,0.000026555635,0.0019936464,0.000073580384,0.000008390975,0.0006149733,0.33911955,0.00010584364,0.00035529726,0.45118678,0.18656,0.019916765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076268725,0.000014605749,0.005994568,0.0001557186,0.000018245439,0.00014855641,0.18063287,0.00009940836,0.00012847147,0.0088824425,0.8038452,0.000072222414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9905895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07488541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07488541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13267578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54333425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380234107","doi":"10.1515/9780773571686-015","title":"The Three Deaths of the Canadian Constitution","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; History; Genealogy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02682881430417118,"score_gpt":0.22918829925618497,"score_spread":0.20235948495201378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380234107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019670708,0.0100982655,0.0009669164,0.086913966,0.0025677609,0.00007138725,0.00048731,0.0000769609,0.87914675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39309812,0.0046485295,0.0008230271,0.031719204,0.0005968497,0.00008022682,0.0001806776,0.0001637998,0.5686895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99447775,0.00048274765,0.00006417328,0.00045119796,0.0018318938,0.0026923332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976739,0.00033354922,0.000078159384,0.00021800344,0.0011774953,0.0005188354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031415587,0.00064325385,0.0006407471,0.001641737,0.034730118,0.01021171,0.001802684,0.006024198,0.0129274195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009093906,0.0005946607,0.00065305387,0.0024538704,0.028865706,0.003322338,0.0036875673,0.013805586,0.0012056172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002849695,0.000010274263,0.00035009303,0.000020162932,0.0000065783825,0.00009218987,0.007647001,0.00014827067,0.00006581705,0.8604802,0.11872155,0.012429396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001625346,0.000008404453,0.0026951712,0.00016169208,0.000019804986,0.000054331507,0.0074653486,0.00013707757,0.00018268234,0.056103226,0.9330877,0.000068156914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99165475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12533008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12533008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17830217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9093376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380249182","doi":"10.1515/9780773592001-008","title":"Canada and Social Justice (An address given to Companions of the Holy Cross at a Retreat of Anglican Women in 1997)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Social justice; Political science; Gender studies; Genealogy; Sociology; History; Geography; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.02259380050069279,"score_gpt":0.2483959147220799,"score_spread":0.2258021142213871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380249182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027573941,0.1027065,0.0004356664,0.16700503,0.011676168,0.00018921336,0.0003123057,0.00007550745,0.6900256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13116978,0.020003187,0.00042923325,0.029632952,0.00073290255,0.00010454478,0.000069532805,0.00013166951,0.81772625],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983822,0.0002014342,0.000022960749,0.00010812146,0.00034382494,0.00094136817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992078,0.00016331329,0.000034523062,0.000015063409,0.00018103461,0.00039826933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001063865,0.00062770356,0.00054440496,0.00121305,0.046428673,0.00861321,0.0018654153,0.006949006,0.023422694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002245391,0.0005572485,0.0003012154,0.002822751,0.009641454,0.0033522234,0.004269402,0.008798341,0.0012955127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018615168,0.000051674928,0.00088776584,0.00011321221,0.000005992725,0.0007819973,0.095956996,0.00006075883,0.00012393997,0.19876187,0.6634511,0.039786007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051914312,0.000008264913,0.0023963535,0.0002204642,0.000004404663,0.00014089687,0.044750106,0.000035128338,0.000070275004,0.0031264136,0.94922006,0.000022527678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9730915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069013506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.069013506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10051711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5007304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380249535","doi":"10.1515/9780773548398-004","title":"Table 1 Entries from <i>The Labrador Companion</i> in order of Cartwright’s page numbers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Order (exchange); Combinatorics; Mathematics; Arithmetic; Computer science; Database; Economics","score_opus":0.01832850782431083,"score_gpt":0.22669208846519806,"score_spread":0.20836358064088722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380249535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033619825,0.00086212845,0.0011166575,0.0011543988,0.0032797453,0.00029757147,0.1398775,0.0032076146,0.8498682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013965725,0.0008696094,0.0014103799,0.0005089807,0.0003267433,0.00021895833,0.049910087,0.002454955,0.9429037],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932706,0.000080688435,0.00003814834,0.000093378934,0.00038736322,0.00007336978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99609,0.0009702749,0.00015123369,0.00034792756,0.0019413985,0.0004990572],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007317087,0.0012248928,0.0012634317,0.0059689456,0.00203525,0.0049885735,0.0017002902,0.00084274466,0.91342956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070033115,0.0007033223,0.0006352085,0.009629876,0.0004303058,0.0030753377,0.0015808886,0.0016413946,0.795656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010645908,0.000007071289,0.000029514355,0.00008002393,4.6817703e-7,0.0000053315075,0.000013338262,0.000011501382,0.000040469735,0.00064079126,0.9874544,0.011706487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074334807,0.0000089754385,0.00036624624,0.00009835368,0.0000017042959,0.000016555781,0.000056042325,0.000027982429,0.000103894185,0.00053861056,0.9987674,0.000006912444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022685625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043090317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97731435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024417753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032843705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12348223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380270479","doi":"10.1515/9780773582521-008","title":"Newfoundland Aethodism and the Question qf Distinctiveness","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0207592850443103,"score_gpt":0.26046378111912505,"score_spread":0.23970449607481475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380270479","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12819296,0.0051225163,0.0010941001,0.020751327,0.00023006092,0.00001695977,0.00018829045,0.00001256432,0.84439117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9327724,0.001064683,0.0006288603,0.0019682779,0.000062451836,0.000017212804,0.00008365981,0.000019565694,0.06338279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867034,0.00032456397,0.000044669338,0.00021674999,0.00016814712,0.0005755638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866736,0.00056542904,0.00012322265,0.00018850251,0.00025948085,0.0001959372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013540689,0.00016291993,0.0003043686,0.0010920537,0.0070233685,0.004608043,0.00058414275,0.0014180129,0.012918064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027477199,0.0001830516,0.00017098639,0.0018788107,0.018650815,0.0037747768,0.0025913613,0.0028735772,0.00048797132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032121778,0.000010892176,0.002768957,0.000027685212,0.000006211457,0.00018232345,0.016779894,0.000041568594,0.00018478515,0.9511482,0.009959323,0.018857982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042807424,0.000034534387,0.06692626,0.0005003571,0.000024011415,0.0008241073,0.066302516,0.00021375788,0.0003175523,0.31516647,0.5495907,0.000056880974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52661073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7187006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47338927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015142329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006105123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9523543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380370786","doi":"10.5406/2327753x.41.1.30","title":"Building Justice: Frank Iacobucci and the Life Cycles of Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Italian Americana","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Indigenous; Government (linguistics); Sociology","score_opus":0.033870499559593294,"score_gpt":0.34508214267974874,"score_spread":0.3112116431201554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380370786","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064322767,0.06171818,0.001213993,0.73325306,0.0043724864,0.000027220342,0.000049044764,0.00007389242,0.19285983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53633326,0.03811507,0.0022951323,0.26330903,0.0034826486,0.00016578194,0.00006662062,0.00018681683,0.15604569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538064,0.0014282656,0.000060619805,0.0005050634,0.0011756248,0.0014497209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944588,0.002283665,0.000242141,0.00021870548,0.001286903,0.0015097976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044570607,0.00039823187,0.00045033253,0.0015168729,0.027497303,0.016871192,0.0014704634,0.0069507957,0.0034791564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010447275,0.00038581507,0.00018402848,0.0015789053,0.03834356,0.00824712,0.0042285467,0.010992219,0.0006985182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008738916,0.000011969221,0.00038139505,0.00003104559,0.0000025285603,0.00012359611,0.017669018,0.00008396432,0.000032571916,0.60918325,0.36359775,0.008874253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005538621,0.000004963027,0.00061252486,0.00031616128,0.000003134228,0.000101487276,0.014844322,0.00011671381,0.000059434646,0.1168704,0.8670343,0.000030972897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52726233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64786184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52726233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039341647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057979368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9510434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382463566","doi":"10.1515/9781553392064-012","title":"The Crown in Canada Today: How Dignified, How Efficient?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Crown (dentistry); Medicine","score_opus":0.018335914793037953,"score_gpt":0.21007230079053532,"score_spread":0.19173638599749737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382463566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05297938,0.04045318,0.0012994427,0.19994295,0.0019294637,0.000051765634,0.0004952532,0.000079621466,0.70276904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58471316,0.020569032,0.0014868344,0.022653116,0.00029139314,0.000032476375,0.00016908991,0.00015180267,0.36993316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99580437,0.00031547842,0.000051308318,0.00032927401,0.001601933,0.0018976125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976833,0.00022144406,0.00007024124,0.00006446307,0.0009825072,0.0009780098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016431607,0.0004462388,0.000513799,0.0013131935,0.02829866,0.017549837,0.002340294,0.005962793,0.01590699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005053979,0.00044212912,0.00028838418,0.0037413144,0.017116752,0.0048346333,0.0030755787,0.0070213503,0.0010911023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029424116,0.00003082098,0.0035248636,0.00011625418,0.000017175871,0.00040091935,0.027766252,0.00038225594,0.00023214264,0.64094424,0.24208768,0.08446794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007374593,0.000009900365,0.007665517,0.00039636146,0.000020324462,0.00012527729,0.038079962,0.00022564715,0.00018017855,0.026411338,0.92680085,0.00007724009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99580234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15510617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15510617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30075532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9799571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382466950","doi":"10.1515/9781553392064-008","title":"La Couronne au Québec de credo rassurant à bouc émissaire commode","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.02527208857189237,"score_gpt":0.2422684509486407,"score_spread":0.21699636237674833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382466950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09079276,0.011206479,0.0019430808,0.036979813,0.0019652552,0.00008064199,0.00050641666,0.00016137051,0.8563642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17941721,0.0017048522,0.0007223953,0.0029255545,0.00008181335,0.000028476266,0.00006587437,0.000059273385,0.8149946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848783,0.00022954388,0.00002421907,0.0001654292,0.00051143114,0.00058156933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921775,0.00015139175,0.000035432276,0.000048192996,0.00028787742,0.0002594001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096538005,0.00046774046,0.00044248204,0.000783804,0.015163711,0.0072172736,0.0007433847,0.0031956865,0.034098133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020974274,0.0004519224,0.00046656668,0.0012296519,0.0047050305,0.0016548975,0.0015255625,0.0059605828,0.0018981835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012877423,0.0000897644,0.008651139,0.00009358746,0.00003428353,0.0012339987,0.013618685,0.00066443975,0.0009712592,0.6816372,0.22590591,0.066970915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015529613,0.000020782862,0.010531505,0.00013949035,0.00000937025,0.00018571745,0.0050137285,0.00028298362,0.00022804414,0.0037364976,0.9798018,0.000034583492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9763421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042320818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042320818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061152533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30706048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382682270","doi":"10.1515/9780773570146-008","title":"Toronto's Legal Challenge to Amalgamation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03158040445935957,"score_gpt":0.24773974503379698,"score_spread":0.21615934057443742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382682270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064749923,0.0136886295,0.0006682127,0.22141823,0.0029808334,0.000022671946,0.00031375088,0.00010061387,0.75433195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20027706,0.0050567463,0.0008656491,0.046539918,0.0012257469,0.000052581312,0.00010743716,0.00015898865,0.7457159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688965,0.0006403436,0.00007476546,0.00030673636,0.0010478589,0.0010406581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722433,0.0009015955,0.00011829179,0.00024090619,0.00066453306,0.0008504076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018121817,0.00047814797,0.0004691668,0.0016189542,0.021688443,0.013975547,0.0016765194,0.009529473,0.027659927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006045788,0.0006573422,0.00048739067,0.0020814498,0.013517707,0.0037877457,0.00445872,0.009319262,0.002192633],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000102908125,0.0000045438046,0.00017009395,0.000028630906,0.0000031441555,0.000120316654,0.005151384,0.000059578106,0.00004280149,0.630669,0.3577234,0.006016814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068449203,0.0000037733528,0.0008961093,0.00009994291,0.0000074668433,0.00005349875,0.003492012,0.00008580548,0.00006376181,0.027976679,0.96729815,0.000016001908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89407134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95909804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10592866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062315132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062824234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45213008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382684771","doi":"10.9783/9781512823578-020","title":"Chapter 17 Equality for Indigenous Women: McIvor v. Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Pennsylvania Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Gender studies; History; Geography; Sociology; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.057543647278707186,"score_gpt":0.25729495922870155,"score_spread":0.19975131194999435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382684771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042445436,0.018801302,0.0002764073,0.034883603,0.0011895315,0.00008430373,0.00025602852,0.000025573825,0.94023865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.097616434,0.012808084,0.0006080498,0.040775508,0.00041003458,0.00013054535,0.00012609488,0.00006104753,0.84746426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998187,0.00015716418,0.000027980412,0.00013112162,0.0007599539,0.00073677354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945456,0.00012447905,0.000024563722,0.00002028997,0.00025119045,0.00012492882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011735752,0.00051385286,0.0004046624,0.0010094556,0.018152133,0.0068832072,0.0018802107,0.006530764,0.021490753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022678066,0.0003809678,0.00039821214,0.0017171794,0.0070555457,0.0024650767,0.0025106359,0.005821196,0.0017547472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010868328,0.000018761943,0.00047804893,0.00010095123,0.0000045239653,0.0001767997,0.008731736,0.00009307471,0.00013622393,0.57149726,0.40069288,0.01805893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005348556,0.0000052518626,0.001131496,0.00029673026,0.000008247146,0.00007384228,0.0045743613,0.000041103223,0.0001240591,0.013918416,0.9798052,0.000016044192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95752287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98308474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044511247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044511247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10912126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32295316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382865101","doi":"10.1515/9780773556041-004","title":"Canadian Constitution-Making in the British World","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; History; Political science; Genealogy; Law","score_opus":0.024589887993251194,"score_gpt":0.24382370407442286,"score_spread":0.21923381608117165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382865101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02540712,0.01581253,0.00045295342,0.026991447,0.00088533974,0.00003553345,0.00045077034,0.000085766755,0.92987853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48987964,0.0116828615,0.0012647682,0.0053321975,0.00019171029,0.000046153782,0.0002664074,0.00016481573,0.4911715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967854,0.00039878537,0.0000693859,0.0003070789,0.0012420458,0.0011972658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795973,0.000398437,0.000059394803,0.0001074652,0.0010608276,0.00041421453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016037043,0.00054119155,0.00057275424,0.0028736182,0.029665444,0.01250135,0.001511841,0.0028107343,0.020717282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004950903,0.00048207206,0.00031934818,0.007049201,0.01073054,0.0025781204,0.0022781217,0.004549751,0.0012029043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033073098,0.000017181446,0.00079013366,0.00008657969,0.0000107784645,0.00018559731,0.013333087,0.00032377656,0.000115855546,0.8144402,0.13659891,0.03406471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008882226,0.000005918345,0.0042400826,0.00015860343,0.000013856314,0.0000547695,0.0069419905,0.00016553001,0.0001085767,0.021280102,0.9669768,0.000044894372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99426055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99778616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15167622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15167622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1637329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98393536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382865251","doi":"10.1515/9780773560390-014","title":"Supreme Court of Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.030221757940809935,"score_gpt":0.24097876092381032,"score_spread":0.21075700298300037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382865251","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077988612,0.008504637,0.00035672553,0.07122877,0.0026428928,0.00012000094,0.0010564172,0.00007565038,0.90821606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07365699,0.002634015,0.00043498358,0.045095056,0.0005623517,0.00015363244,0.0002877155,0.00011408244,0.8770611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99249446,0.00048691532,0.0001387207,0.0009198846,0.0029070426,0.003053061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963217,0.0006570108,0.00008184465,0.00021728854,0.0020143252,0.0007078563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002642324,0.0009886035,0.0013769325,0.0026856763,0.039318137,0.017367631,0.0037557743,0.01789323,0.043603383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009447974,0.0011847374,0.0011322766,0.0029307534,0.0062315334,0.0034035763,0.0041854684,0.017692963,0.004224246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035540408,0.000036446152,0.0005562611,0.000044126562,0.000020368792,0.0002080566,0.001065455,0.00019750069,0.00009302317,0.555479,0.4329015,0.009362713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029774928,0.0000101294445,0.0015516373,0.00022162044,0.000036048015,0.000053069023,0.0014464064,0.0002804729,0.00015576507,0.03087274,0.9652804,0.00006187563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97245646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9891179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09173699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09173699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18409374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66560155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383336169","doi":"10.20884/1.jdh.2021.21.1.2878","title":"Rights of the Indigenous Peoples to Self-Government: A Comparative Analysis between New Zealand and Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurnal Dinamika Hukum","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Indigenous rights; Political science; Public administration; Human rights; Self-determination; Law","score_opus":0.01669315773775935,"score_gpt":0.27858160322916364,"score_spread":0.2618884454914043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383336169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93088305,0.0020471662,0.000077019606,0.0010360919,0.000014663772,0.000053441527,0.00023965568,0.0000034005009,0.06564546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929259,0.0018338497,0.0001345136,0.000091824484,0.0000031397067,0.00001565216,0.00010843699,0.0000043867167,0.0048821946],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980178,0.00015338886,0.000057614485,0.000110888985,0.0007796612,0.0008806895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810994,0.0003364007,0.00020583306,0.000058449095,0.0008725753,0.00041670245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010852381,0.00016348092,0.0003585318,0.0034625777,0.008606625,0.0027474249,0.00075283647,0.00045945088,0.0036238765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032886658,0.00014759225,0.00028327882,0.0061431294,0.0037433323,0.0010011003,0.0018133699,0.00073874777,0.00012862007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042462288,0.0002671981,0.2917567,0.0009687155,0.0001720478,0.0050318716,0.48261583,0.00085058075,0.0033990506,0.099658124,0.00981603,0.10503924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015983524,0.000046460114,0.6492371,0.00033550526,0.00007939657,0.0004364297,0.29367855,0.00044382486,0.0003754363,0.0009691249,0.05431124,0.00007098767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9935322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05202832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05202832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049086876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37749368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383337109","doi":"10.5325/victinstj.40.1.0207","title":"Rev. of <i>Reading for the Law: British Literary History and Gender Advocacy</i>, by Christine L. Krueger","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victorians Institute Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Icon; Reading (process); Publishing; State (computer science); Download; History; Library science; Media studies; Law; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Algorithm","score_opus":0.041248435891974036,"score_gpt":0.2985531244782445,"score_spread":0.2573046885862705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383337109","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023974977,0.67665505,0.00025394085,0.124355465,0.01674666,0.000029980254,0.0002269851,0.00006940992,0.18142273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008496732,0.37495452,0.00036951966,0.054129723,0.009845329,0.00011011223,0.00036722462,0.00022781955,0.55149907],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977558,0.00044067108,0.0001403116,0.00025272544,0.0011921164,0.00021832094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752635,0.00082865625,0.00021431412,0.00015023045,0.0010090839,0.0002714364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016031372,0.0009006762,0.00081033364,0.0030391554,0.0023803296,0.0058791507,0.0014509865,0.00567532,0.06156342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051173694,0.0005189973,0.0005853366,0.0036289662,0.0041321586,0.006404977,0.0024196152,0.0056210333,0.040168263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004718114,0.0000042967436,0.000033278124,0.00028837155,0.0000030204048,0.000016976326,0.00025824204,0.000009477736,0.000053479172,0.009506198,0.9617893,0.02803267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013745171,0.0000027494184,0.00020505555,0.0005701841,0.000001857428,0.000029143785,0.00016969898,0.0000041707603,0.000020171046,0.0013890978,0.99760336,0.0000032213436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04353484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07806878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06156342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074083176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009589451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20595014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383456423","doi":"10.1515/9780773571594-018","title":"The Canadian Constitution: What Is at Stake in the West?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.03174961614287194,"score_gpt":0.2403044116089876,"score_spread":0.20855479546611566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383456423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01641616,0.029229455,0.0008413733,0.18813181,0.001437289,0.000029007453,0.00036203873,0.000053427662,0.76349944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64086896,0.02691926,0.0016835018,0.05011481,0.0007671802,0.00006291161,0.00027149153,0.00014413927,0.2791677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945227,0.00066227216,0.000071029244,0.00034807783,0.0018840845,0.0025118217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969572,0.0006808385,0.00010397545,0.00012161399,0.001466611,0.00066984666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027977417,0.00071520277,0.0007828317,0.0031162421,0.030008366,0.019977398,0.0020634593,0.005415148,0.013126818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007192215,0.0005618629,0.00037047014,0.0068981224,0.026814042,0.006903374,0.002499312,0.007655718,0.0011428059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018698543,0.000012018706,0.00061406626,0.00006238889,0.000007111373,0.00009428972,0.010264378,0.00010455401,0.00008084032,0.8842408,0.08688088,0.017619904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015716365,0.000008428753,0.006474203,0.00057077815,0.000039984152,0.00008365056,0.026911749,0.00019374547,0.00018483389,0.11345929,0.8519621,0.000095561634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9943944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9968953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14275701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14275701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23783807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99428034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384079912","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4499109","title":"The Canada Disability Benefit Act and Women with Disabilities: Pursuing Disability Equality and Reducing Administrative Violence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Bureaucracy; Economic Justice; Political science; Income Support; Criminal justice; Inclusion (mineral); Order (exchange); Public administration; Business; Politics; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Finance","score_opus":0.025882486630221323,"score_gpt":0.31583444827376955,"score_spread":0.28995196164354825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384079912","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37318352,0.008778462,0.0006024352,0.38926595,0.0011807185,0.00024018653,0.00049120514,0.000029177643,0.22622839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90848166,0.0038053102,0.0005696032,0.04776681,0.00017890196,0.00013675928,0.000100842844,0.00001999071,0.038940094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871811,0.0023535378,0.00020055193,0.00032971337,0.0027183683,0.0072167967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831987,0.003638227,0.0011804297,0.0002809092,0.0024191746,0.009282603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004902741,0.00037935778,0.0005600981,0.0017826775,0.028038332,0.008927726,0.0030709608,0.008167841,0.009206386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025422405,0.00043048078,0.0005595034,0.002374895,0.009702056,0.0030534067,0.0094023645,0.008144253,0.00048404117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027727312,0.0014110678,0.16565312,0.00034189128,0.0001278849,0.0007994107,0.10696514,0.0009077119,0.0006088702,0.29340774,0.25187346,0.1776265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017357014,0.00023675946,0.2520555,0.0013651723,0.00024110815,0.00030121423,0.34802973,0.0008553556,0.000776855,0.028372113,0.367375,0.00021755171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98388094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92228746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.077712566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36180088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56384677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384202534","doi":"10.1515/9780773567993-007","title":"First Nations and the Derivation of Canada's Underlying Title: Comparing Perspectives on Legal Ideology","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.032097006483505004,"score_gpt":0.24338919048077312,"score_spread":0.21129218399726812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384202534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0636882,0.006018365,0.0009590338,0.021293433,0.000357869,0.000025774774,0.0003029809,0.00001803881,0.9073363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9544218,0.0026689416,0.000605552,0.0030277586,0.000059425056,0.000029317438,0.000114957584,0.00006546052,0.039006803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944296,0.0011424498,0.00008094019,0.00032702964,0.0021110706,0.001908921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99293077,0.003010825,0.00037785174,0.0002098875,0.0023839632,0.0010865984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027734411,0.00033771773,0.000494002,0.0045530894,0.0248442,0.01654807,0.0013869472,0.002679503,0.007457156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010783337,0.0002938529,0.00029987496,0.0076141735,0.022371935,0.003824978,0.003158926,0.0049548508,0.0003518942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016944774,0.000007005536,0.0013180745,0.000029968394,0.000005409743,0.000051720875,0.03106482,0.000051725317,0.00005932452,0.95339435,0.007746946,0.006253722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004344245,0.000026293277,0.044873398,0.0017451191,0.00006654994,0.00016640921,0.15247995,0.00049984007,0.0007061992,0.22899203,0.5702752,0.00012554532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9580231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9803587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08969021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08969021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.122726016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65075105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384215026","doi":"10.1515/9780773568693","title":"Between State and Market","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Business; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.02326598230029598,"score_gpt":0.24665758593882903,"score_spread":0.22339160363853305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384215026","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038874268,0.0023906704,0.004714437,0.022770952,0.00051480933,0.00002086786,0.000104237355,0.00007167389,0.96552503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6076903,0.0035158503,0.00248924,0.014487699,0.0009602299,0.0001541581,0.00018483172,0.0001753413,0.37034237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977209,0.0005548808,0.000055948432,0.0005765695,0.0005039234,0.0005877725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990074,0.0003805942,0.00009031382,0.00020161262,0.00015711044,0.00016306828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015825229,0.00031971768,0.00043194598,0.0008637042,0.00536042,0.013512488,0.00097095896,0.003835097,0.046831034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031828664,0.0002579737,0.00041474844,0.0018876359,0.014195309,0.010172946,0.0055186586,0.005076724,0.0038028082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001777593,0.0000018484677,0.000052152598,0.0000033705774,7.350453e-7,0.000008991173,0.00027136586,0.000026458756,0.000008115275,0.99409264,0.0037212917,0.0018111203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009072662,0.000009230981,0.00037410867,0.00010719748,0.000005387984,0.000054522683,0.0015419098,0.0003544103,0.000056275847,0.55064785,0.44683024,0.000009781168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02625648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024752691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046831034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008916392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008505438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15666544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384254841","doi":"10.1515/9780773597822-007","title":"The Constitution of Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.031453810292057516,"score_gpt":0.23769374672263913,"score_spread":0.2062399364305816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384254841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038494172,0.006577264,0.00045123033,0.022426905,0.0006203627,0.00003674229,0.0005013588,0.000041585026,0.9654952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18821679,0.0050707306,0.0010180721,0.014151028,0.0002502293,0.00013939981,0.0003654298,0.00015760932,0.7906307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99522614,0.00050056877,0.00008528212,0.0005527973,0.0018025725,0.0018325758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838936,0.00020759001,0.000040981075,0.00014395571,0.00087523775,0.00034286964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015944571,0.00071153097,0.00069349475,0.0019265539,0.024115397,0.015460983,0.0018646306,0.006028457,0.030449321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053446903,0.0006557773,0.0004745896,0.003576739,0.012285571,0.0035745776,0.003955935,0.0070309653,0.002477906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007007382,0.0000065026484,0.00015948791,0.000015755564,0.000003418648,0.00002885914,0.0012235163,0.00008613759,0.000026673597,0.9168689,0.07677156,0.0048022987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007743454,0.0000030707974,0.00087265694,0.00011936033,0.000007221024,0.00002201382,0.0018240373,0.000088995344,0.000058559654,0.06251532,0.93445647,0.00002460367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9860212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9906008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10311184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10311184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19374928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7481322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384497133","doi":"10.29173/crossings174","title":"Rooted Constitution: A look into the Living Tree Doctrine and Indigenous Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Crossings An Undergraduate Arts Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Doctrine; Constitution; Dismissal; Indigenous rights; State (computer science); Colonialism; Law; Political science; Sociology; Human rights; Ecology","score_opus":0.03390494428882619,"score_gpt":0.32550738994517375,"score_spread":0.2916024456563476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384497133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1188263,0.008738253,0.011826093,0.03532967,0.00034060996,0.00004197995,0.00006524841,0.000042050913,0.8247898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9671261,0.002226084,0.0016683183,0.0022909176,0.00010888694,0.000017019744,0.00002835657,0.000027414339,0.026506891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979685,0.0004498453,0.000031211504,0.00017144535,0.0006495201,0.00072943914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891686,0.00054283673,0.000077144745,0.000084631385,0.0002415635,0.00013687155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016792326,0.00016899724,0.0002631796,0.001548972,0.009342923,0.0064203716,0.0012189884,0.002728638,0.0033903988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027926152,0.00013120621,0.0003399722,0.0016113137,0.041677445,0.0048260884,0.002659119,0.0041540083,0.00019229973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011930807,0.0000027354358,0.0001604737,0.000006214288,7.625092e-7,0.0000804895,0.0060220244,0.00006354395,0.00006934448,0.99126804,0.0005542278,0.0017709135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011650671,0.000022218408,0.006136025,0.00029725666,0.000015511245,0.00027399574,0.034410726,0.00097344734,0.0003733219,0.72742933,0.2300211,0.000035384986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6140064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6926866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6140064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025013702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023916904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7765336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384704418","doi":"10.56544/jblr.2023.05.71.1","title":"Substantive Equality and Judicial Review: An Overview of the Supreme Court of Canada’s Equal Rights Jurisprudence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jeonbuk Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Judicial review","score_opus":0.11855370226922582,"score_gpt":0.39766696449005595,"score_spread":0.2791132622208301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384704418","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008182122,0.4629719,0.005320869,0.3561207,0.004153127,0.0002619067,0.00032516976,0.00008683264,0.16257748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5048981,0.24324608,0.010115834,0.15413114,0.0072647366,0.0005045418,0.00034552117,0.00021654055,0.07927752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9639224,0.010886553,0.0013245244,0.0022808574,0.014495282,0.0070903683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95447576,0.02378174,0.0014701949,0.0012974382,0.014614706,0.0043601627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029968329,0.0006543962,0.0014175564,0.011200781,0.020506093,0.02445103,0.003944187,0.013913209,0.0035493725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043619324,0.0010819476,0.0010330038,0.013657382,0.03403004,0.0067916494,0.0045373826,0.009415711,0.00040198947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019656292,0.000039717634,0.0011685257,0.00046826203,0.000040679526,0.00019606092,0.0033503112,0.0008574735,0.00013051557,0.8553106,0.09922204,0.03919602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047185928,0.00003049529,0.009135945,0.002445027,0.00005381397,0.00011761406,0.0027622865,0.001156631,0.00019001354,0.14943796,0.834475,0.00014805413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95447016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98062027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19936214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19936214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35620236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9286264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384790460","doi":"10.1093/oed/8866927985","title":"Nova Scotia, n.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); History; Engineering; Archaeology; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.06446472084522203,"score_gpt":0.26698820555051955,"score_spread":0.20252348470529752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384790460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056140805,0.045028567,0.00036213713,0.008124102,0.0032266267,0.000076167016,0.022677064,0.00023639596,0.91465485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0056163413,0.0072174594,0.00021656798,0.00074824225,0.00005534792,0.000039682855,0.0011422331,0.00010069906,0.98486346],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998223,0.000012980898,0.000014319734,0.00004098037,0.000052658743,0.000056782046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999511,0.00010452451,0.000044768974,0.00004518207,0.00020036165,0.00009411024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002269544,0.0007304341,0.0005525613,0.00093788677,0.0027048744,0.0029281934,0.0008599419,0.0015018943,0.22064066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011868558,0.000610608,0.00038088957,0.002805231,0.0006452755,0.0010437175,0.0010336988,0.0015453295,0.07149485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001810496,0.000013792581,0.0012733209,0.00073856505,0.000016229793,0.0007827436,0.0006042981,0.0004163716,0.00075820944,0.013183761,0.89157367,0.090458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014802455,0.0000057326233,0.0075674634,0.00040382674,0.0000041855255,0.00011152852,0.00034531543,0.00005108452,0.0001037505,0.000675008,0.9907075,0.000009815469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6849433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9317544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31505668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060216235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007779049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7381165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385249996","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-30002-8_1","title":"Radical Autonomy in Supreme Court of Canada Jurisprudence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"˜The œInternational Library of Bioethics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Autonomy; Charter; Sociology","score_opus":0.05860171173620505,"score_gpt":0.30636976904354946,"score_spread":0.2477680573073444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385249996","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021053668,0.009719334,0.0018102775,0.04634847,0.00096783205,0.00008285821,0.00021256678,0.000060508195,0.91974443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59946185,0.003135807,0.00175163,0.013441829,0.0004436195,0.00011767937,0.000102512444,0.00015096185,0.3813942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917338,0.0011642379,0.0001336119,0.0007000213,0.0032887622,0.0029796588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958727,0.0017590461,0.0000937547,0.00023200129,0.0013544763,0.00068802707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040683234,0.00056544895,0.0009739803,0.0025818704,0.0345172,0.017775062,0.0039601275,0.010932098,0.011586413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0108771855,0.001016517,0.0005925682,0.003476859,0.023249721,0.0038317353,0.0040440056,0.014855391,0.0009715854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004937832,0.000008932515,0.000100895464,0.000007864294,0.000003536706,0.000036757356,0.0023252952,0.0001620736,0.000027457176,0.9741019,0.02051571,0.0027045093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031954125,0.000011804303,0.002163749,0.00025261575,0.00003218009,0.000071927025,0.0047569275,0.0014536319,0.00023587677,0.44669545,0.5441997,0.00009420662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97756326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.990239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14714077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14714077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2008794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9891958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385362892","doi":"10.1515/9780773571914-016","title":"Resolution to Amend the Manitoba Act Intoduced in the Manitoba Legislative Assembly by Attorney-General Roland Penner, 4 July 1983","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; General assembly; Resolution (logic); Law; Political science; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.03221025156567888,"score_gpt":0.25396118569878723,"score_spread":0.22175093413310834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385362892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069529866,0.007769136,0.0010216808,0.10452606,0.016691418,0.0013436979,0.0062095295,0.0004242243,0.85506123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0071231336,0.0010330133,0.0007929037,0.02527224,0.00034427637,0.0003334646,0.000703821,0.000077100136,0.96432],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99609995,0.00041793234,0.00026439351,0.00030561976,0.001817624,0.0010944435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932781,0.00076880027,0.00019680917,0.000272446,0.0046529453,0.0008308932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047688745,0.0008178042,0.0007302712,0.0019315914,0.0134469215,0.0068699634,0.0035155404,0.013185587,0.06863273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009142675,0.001365041,0.0007963606,0.0023711775,0.0023672667,0.0017021026,0.0024259943,0.01008763,0.036430467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021080845,0.00003219768,0.0004792207,0.00005565139,0.0000049902974,0.00022616975,0.0009820648,0.000056117726,0.00024066414,0.022781366,0.971199,0.0039215256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019076559,0.000010044264,0.0019564496,0.00018321697,0.000008146917,0.00005662216,0.00090671267,0.000030832092,0.00023687551,0.0007154958,0.9958544,0.000022139917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76181763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.894281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23818237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033673268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0979912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47917008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385367737","doi":"10.1515/9781553394518-007","title":"Respecting Legal Pluralism in Canada : Indigenous Bar Association Appeals to Harper Government to Appoint an Aboriginal Justice to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Indigenous; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Pluralism (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Legal pluralism; Sociology; Legal profession; Legal realism; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014373876632554322,"score_gpt":0.23222544590446054,"score_spread":0.21785156927190621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385367737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056084372,0.025264392,0.0014434275,0.25618044,0.0031496491,0.00015028771,0.00024811763,0.000070532544,0.6574088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6518121,0.0109954635,0.0011211762,0.04899961,0.00060626055,0.00008091981,0.00008816971,0.000094450595,0.28620186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913101,0.0010788058,0.00011312933,0.0004779661,0.0028323892,0.0041876645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962304,0.0011055325,0.00013475202,0.00009334614,0.0012327187,0.001203191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048657893,0.00053645455,0.00067090365,0.0014986378,0.06088182,0.016760798,0.0031663838,0.011080701,0.006547361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073750285,0.0006497632,0.0005740971,0.0031509358,0.025645163,0.0033046203,0.0054179453,0.015719725,0.00052462536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025247453,0.000048928203,0.0015578852,0.00008860083,0.000024257466,0.00077911606,0.08985523,0.0005498836,0.00027069377,0.64869446,0.23625211,0.02185356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003432565,0.000023613462,0.00854262,0.00053594814,0.000049312683,0.00026628,0.076606154,0.0006517688,0.00042583738,0.044017285,0.86869633,0.00015051967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99604404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19971427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19971427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4014942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.928218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385368179","doi":"10.1515/9781553394242-001","title":"Acknowledgements","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.02967689233155448,"score_gpt":0.25491243432330574,"score_spread":0.22523554199175125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385368179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00418919,0.009150952,0.013808516,0.2702126,0.07361456,0.0012323656,0.058209587,0.003342354,0.5662399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023271905,0.0033556856,0.0077811996,0.025309116,0.0044338983,0.00074896927,0.018287968,0.0023002804,0.91451097],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99119383,0.001240399,0.00035040072,0.0007918029,0.00555621,0.00086748163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95514363,0.0033228386,0.001011217,0.001689603,0.031608034,0.00722462],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067244,0.0008700681,0.0011154477,0.0020483052,0.0042952686,0.004760431,0.002979698,0.0014141505,0.32983518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037614133,0.00030238155,0.0004195545,0.002306143,0.0013597071,0.0020347144,0.0050326763,0.003499688,0.14811689],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034356166,0.0000062585677,0.00030174913,0.000121011246,0.0000028988143,0.00012517815,0.0011792389,0.000036932226,0.00026404203,0.0077667437,0.9707546,0.01940686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031378813,0.000002047271,0.00031165814,0.000078902165,0.000001986991,0.00006854158,0.0005725509,0.00003244642,0.0000556198,0.00076638,0.9981021,0.0000046751616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14220804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19613577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6701648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011024624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022327518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9559088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385470081","doi":"10.4018/978-1-6684-4163-3.ch001","title":"Attending School","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in educational marketing, administration, and leadership book series","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compulsory education; Political science; Convention; Public administration; School system; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Education Act; Pedagogy; Sociology; Law; Special education; Human rights","score_opus":0.07152378903292372,"score_gpt":0.33713502361674424,"score_spread":0.2656112345838205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385470081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019229816,0.0018037437,0.00021171272,0.0017547929,0.0005514076,0.000030505524,0.000376469,0.00007079528,0.9932776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0064183334,0.0019722977,0.0001760417,0.00091679994,0.00009492383,0.000015713007,0.00026364686,0.000028424645,0.990114],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997788,0.000025334835,0.0000058946084,0.000037287202,0.00008982759,0.00006291043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99986863,0.00001951244,0.000007628737,0.000008888049,0.00003624732,0.000059058155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001418554,0.00033936018,0.0002493616,0.00054051954,0.002706919,0.0018711693,0.00043495191,0.0006490335,0.19167194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038781037,0.00016239507,0.00019885047,0.0007210341,0.00048150762,0.0014519638,0.0010834504,0.0010699864,0.05146841],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012432512,0.00007805429,0.0008257325,0.00014724344,0.0000014117425,0.00015558014,0.006066267,0.0000625818,0.00033434163,0.092167735,0.743844,0.15630467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.718407e-7,0.0000046316122,0.0007105914,0.000044439796,4.2130526e-7,0.000030315254,0.00074088125,0.0000048350566,0.000023908631,0.00079005555,0.9976478,0.0000014699698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026512938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1252055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19167194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021068386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002260798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6412065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385473246","doi":"10.4018/978-1-6684-4163-3.ch008","title":"Framework of Education Governance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in educational marketing, administration, and leadership book series","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; China; Public administration; Political science; Public education; Higher education; Management; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.052319556911075885,"score_gpt":0.33672905038010315,"score_spread":0.2844094934690273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385473246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013513672,0.002264224,0.014942973,0.010501083,0.00014041098,0.00007932471,0.00014989152,0.00004189753,0.9705287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49215114,0.007865527,0.03026519,0.006760943,0.00051012647,0.00080623024,0.000530937,0.00008378864,0.46102607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811256,0.0006514683,0.00005418255,0.0002956931,0.0005360306,0.00035010435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995426,0.000097273354,0.000044596825,0.00006226955,0.00016097333,0.000092360075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015361161,0.00046066934,0.00027233243,0.0012676392,0.003551277,0.0075886017,0.0012632458,0.0023346127,0.010625478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012870553,0.00018337846,0.00033523157,0.0018702361,0.014912317,0.0032977108,0.0022321788,0.0023403652,0.0016773072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.8221888e-7,0.0000011877985,0.0000237133,0.0000039444753,2.950546e-7,0.0000067412448,0.00022851395,0.000088005756,0.0000048424636,0.99663615,0.0020155665,0.0009907959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006788825,0.0000043475916,0.0003191092,0.00011552614,0.0000018868072,0.000039088343,0.0006947498,0.0005465102,0.000030088462,0.6041935,0.39404395,0.0000044850817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13744085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14202322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13744085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02531409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018866235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27328175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385510024","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1428","title":"Equality before the Charter: Reflections on Fraser v. Canada (Attorney General)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Supreme court; Charter; Sociology; Political science; Equal Protection Clause","score_opus":0.08100061302339426,"score_gpt":0.3664157798178432,"score_spread":0.2854151667944489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385510024","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019651568,0.04125827,0.0011120706,0.67674893,0.0042441217,0.00010809631,0.00030278956,0.00006544054,0.2565088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35865352,0.017925208,0.0015663193,0.4908396,0.0014740606,0.000111020636,0.00012234511,0.00017524345,0.12913278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97328407,0.0035572008,0.0004192604,0.0025699856,0.010519142,0.0096502565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939022,0.0025896719,0.00021475922,0.00014082398,0.0018658062,0.001286598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010945078,0.0008903111,0.0009392004,0.0029497829,0.07578764,0.019882865,0.0059365234,0.02700731,0.006494177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01570878,0.0010219422,0.0010878367,0.0042213667,0.046618387,0.006917983,0.0056891995,0.028003229,0.0005242632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003035033,0.00003336181,0.0007574959,0.00010730746,0.000015744448,0.0008789377,0.029589426,0.00027982309,0.0002546413,0.76293314,0.19129689,0.013822859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041226784,0.00003413739,0.0040216213,0.0007203817,0.000040208677,0.0002508103,0.031065749,0.00029507754,0.00037664085,0.05296797,0.90993905,0.00024711242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.995131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23846082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23846082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28444478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88327754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385510060","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1424","title":"Indigenous Peoples’ Transboundary Claims, Access to Justice, and the Canadian Constitutional Structure: The Uashaunnuat Case","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Supreme court; Indigenous; Law; Jurisdiction; Adjudication; Political science; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.03968060700097151,"score_gpt":0.3316240375522118,"score_spread":0.2919434305512403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385510060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5203256,0.005510535,0.0012117196,0.033940822,0.00026631352,0.00013706791,0.00023347519,0.00003202433,0.43834248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97103745,0.0010998809,0.0006830957,0.0040854174,0.000036348218,0.000038453552,0.000054172688,0.000013166297,0.022952061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99233043,0.0006178156,0.00011488311,0.00055945443,0.0021233086,0.0042541474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99641234,0.0013016023,0.00019715194,0.000160894,0.0011353298,0.0007926681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003586311,0.00049387326,0.00049738033,0.0020690223,0.049264215,0.010562966,0.0031296143,0.0058194497,0.0042693634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006918356,0.0006105336,0.0005504592,0.0030116318,0.022473494,0.0025657073,0.005066811,0.005415818,0.00019400365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067720495,0.00004515001,0.009441187,0.000083521234,0.000026391986,0.0020296706,0.0509725,0.0006741034,0.0007620635,0.91206765,0.012396709,0.011433356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024553508,0.0001352097,0.07357809,0.0009557362,0.0003585508,0.0015402162,0.27862942,0.004831056,0.0029098026,0.10097931,0.5350339,0.00080312457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9963786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99886525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15992083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15992083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15517358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97437274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512090","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1391","title":"From Ford v. Québec to the Act Respecting the Laicity of the State : A Distinctive Quebec Theory and Practice of the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Legislature; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.05270121961710043,"score_gpt":0.3456913995351534,"score_spread":0.29299017991805293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05600342,0.067735195,0.0015931341,0.2318158,0.0027622993,0.00013016777,0.0015771578,0.00006430671,0.6383185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6993824,0.016247902,0.0013749745,0.1118013,0.00049040513,0.00009001252,0.00038692923,0.00006365629,0.17016241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970192,0.0005415275,0.00007310768,0.00042003515,0.0011385093,0.0008076551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959352,0.0014507162,0.00016671966,0.00016297537,0.0017515406,0.000532885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025174648,0.0002830372,0.00028344739,0.0016146762,0.015454381,0.006101572,0.0013369088,0.0046735527,0.0065552564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006926501,0.00032129898,0.0003782122,0.002303929,0.00841015,0.0019829038,0.0011098329,0.005411944,0.00039184638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051598625,0.000028419287,0.0052359626,0.00020779535,0.00002586932,0.00064502563,0.010866128,0.00041208926,0.0003025568,0.6316115,0.32161397,0.028999073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035031,0.000019933677,0.013714284,0.00044430187,0.000046649708,0.00015073898,0.004692296,0.00023806297,0.00032445273,0.013143414,0.96712005,0.00007069058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9953354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99784756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09510711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09510711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13732545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6900536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512103","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1384","title":"Whose Right is it Anyway? Adjudicating Charter Rights in the Context of Multiple Rights Holders","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Context (archaeology); Fundamental rights; Law; Political science; Reservation of rights; Censorship; Freedom of expression; Bill of rights; State (computer science); Law and economics; Human rights; Right to property; Sociology; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.06894310356870742,"score_gpt":0.3283241320384032,"score_spread":0.2593810284696958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512103","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060357314,0.0073325536,0.042237993,0.31461775,0.0032035387,0.00030000287,0.0001549976,0.00010603549,0.57168984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89163756,0.0029641974,0.015960906,0.041856784,0.001800598,0.00034356772,0.00007300571,0.00012404165,0.0452394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.921532,0.040372398,0.0030789583,0.008277134,0.013305204,0.013434313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93247503,0.043224536,0.003893942,0.008026853,0.0088751055,0.003504496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09352767,0.00044431153,0.0014471848,0.0018098913,0.021373214,0.027122362,0.005114355,0.018864866,0.0061747036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.103437856,0.0007191114,0.0010560076,0.0021440254,0.067436434,0.027001215,0.012239332,0.022371564,0.0008818918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073027536,0.000007966768,0.00022152686,0.000013664969,0.000003977779,0.000090796086,0.0054142987,0.000050708804,0.00005616669,0.98732376,0.0037007974,0.003109028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053782594,0.000033829867,0.00094566785,0.0005189426,0.00003862004,0.00020172891,0.017404474,0.00075574033,0.00048133713,0.76633054,0.21312761,0.000107795066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10506073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.113976024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8949393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018075569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044880554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49462748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512271","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1343","title":"Issue 2: A Human Right to Self-Government over First Nations Child and Family Services and Beyond: Implications of the Caring Society Case","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Tribunal; Government (linguistics); Human services; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Child protection; Public administration; Economic growth; Law; Sociology; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.012023446822483264,"score_gpt":0.3079686206259714,"score_spread":0.29594517380348817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512271","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040687032,0.0032394894,0.0014799114,0.4996472,0.0031113632,0.00015173822,0.00014574635,0.00003304211,0.45150447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4869053,0.0025405118,0.0017137013,0.37919337,0.0020471704,0.00030483335,0.0000837686,0.00007975241,0.12713164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98885125,0.0020419685,0.00028430458,0.0011129647,0.0034807245,0.0042287577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99373055,0.0037545487,0.00026862518,0.00028483357,0.0008338792,0.0011275334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077022333,0.0004453188,0.0006929058,0.0010213095,0.030297844,0.013701955,0.0036904574,0.03162333,0.009300785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012518727,0.0004953735,0.001110368,0.0010207177,0.025547625,0.0065022884,0.0067602415,0.024624582,0.00068600214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010524215,0.000056973462,0.00093334226,0.00004125686,0.000004960173,0.0012313164,0.014574958,0.00015086829,0.00014038417,0.9341087,0.045182213,0.0035643883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006600749,0.000043070188,0.005700021,0.0009040233,0.00004713664,0.0013451403,0.041295093,0.0007224351,0.000805585,0.16465491,0.78425777,0.0001588327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56040806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6269122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43959194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026147593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057423294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88436157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512902","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3192","title":"The Wastelander Life: Living Before and After the Release of Daniels v Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Supreme court; Law; Colonialism; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Ecology","score_opus":0.015443737261227972,"score_gpt":0.2666168764971728,"score_spread":0.2511731392359448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512902","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36955667,0.0072629848,0.000543539,0.37924615,0.0023915488,0.00010741847,0.00056858355,0.000046094923,0.24027698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81085455,0.002585503,0.00028137182,0.09201151,0.00022829739,0.00003879015,0.00014894364,0.00006967945,0.09378137],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921863,0.00084176316,0.00009247909,0.0005733525,0.0021229174,0.004183138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99422705,0.0013095408,0.00025158652,0.00014242063,0.0019677219,0.0021016663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038505848,0.00028953826,0.00053354993,0.0009783552,0.069579706,0.013038844,0.002558577,0.009218724,0.0047191037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01150316,0.00042222705,0.0004500002,0.0017738576,0.019035783,0.0032177274,0.0047705295,0.015089961,0.00034273314],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014509178,0.00013201706,0.0154797835,0.00011221851,0.000057100977,0.0060196845,0.41773427,0.00039058854,0.0010986456,0.2719296,0.25562194,0.03127904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020386151,0.000052709187,0.019166168,0.00034621783,0.00005353505,0.0004201499,0.3916723,0.00014925889,0.0008239381,0.007786742,0.5792811,0.00022747827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9886085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12631135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12631135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17045176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91645724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518197","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1073","title":"Equality Rights and Social Benefit Programs","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Supreme court; Law; Statutory law; Petitioner; Discretion; Political science; Premise; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.07514013986686569,"score_gpt":0.3631276397393052,"score_spread":0.2879874998724395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033686288,0.0020027726,0.008024115,0.04642813,0.00016716334,0.000077554076,0.00013010675,0.00003154342,0.9094523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9257307,0.0007622484,0.0025947036,0.014423354,0.00025195035,0.00021937162,0.000068919944,0.000020665673,0.05592803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98336893,0.0063408706,0.0003628729,0.0017657604,0.004006669,0.004154976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99574417,0.0020180505,0.00034967688,0.00064469315,0.0007434535,0.00049989333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009553843,0.00033847665,0.0005142951,0.0010631451,0.008136264,0.0067676166,0.0013825445,0.0063624973,0.00987467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011726925,0.00031903962,0.00044447233,0.0010392447,0.031085642,0.0042048986,0.0069793174,0.005340074,0.0005774791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023518292,0.0000040329887,0.000105060215,0.0000046200053,0.0000013287644,0.000011598055,0.00029899884,0.000048047896,0.000015536512,0.9970542,0.00078802375,0.0016661071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044942815,0.000039541646,0.0025629462,0.00017435248,0.000017673041,0.000066952336,0.0010521682,0.00050261547,0.00029802305,0.8709063,0.12431157,0.000022908946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10171834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.116312355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10171834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01197476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017295888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20225257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385519106","doi":"10.1515/9780228002512-008","title":"6 Consensual Constitution? Contractual Thinking in the Interpretation of the Canadian Constitution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional interpretation; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.024897634626850268,"score_gpt":0.2439224325692092,"score_spread":0.21902479794235893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385519106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004492406,0.007186636,0.0025713053,0.02701278,0.000422734,0.000026272832,0.00013249741,0.000028547653,0.9581269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6078668,0.008102845,0.00527641,0.012701749,0.00061610696,0.00009737696,0.00018185003,0.0001546764,0.36500227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711514,0.0008000136,0.000053568958,0.00025430747,0.0009472117,0.0008296626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988739,0.00035650586,0.00003697451,0.00007284272,0.0005295907,0.00013004581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002337043,0.0005838856,0.0004436306,0.0020252638,0.0137090525,0.0086631095,0.0018264801,0.004020633,0.012477501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041431654,0.00039421715,0.00042567556,0.0033786013,0.024730755,0.003665467,0.0015824717,0.0051034875,0.00075033004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014128897,0.0000012216283,0.000023627234,0.0000056091453,5.154951e-7,0.000010051347,0.001018737,0.00004683322,0.000009031406,0.9909565,0.006697557,0.0012290512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012925451,0.000005304574,0.0014870573,0.00022344736,0.000012329766,0.000054435313,0.004156071,0.0006127022,0.00010920905,0.52024746,0.4730433,0.000035843717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97004175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97948986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07551542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07551542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.090862244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54790527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385589491","doi":"10.59962/9780774868280-009","title":"7 Nova Scotia Court of Appeal","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Appeal; Nova (rocket); Law; Political science; History; Engineering; Archaeology; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.028554729077297104,"score_gpt":0.22597255948514758,"score_spread":0.19741783040785046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385589491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009561892,0.0029300142,0.00012539678,0.01807794,0.002230182,0.00019019826,0.0017392412,0.00009144439,0.9650536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015173858,0.00040228793,0.00008202718,0.0055040126,0.000096206815,0.000049600258,0.00015192317,0.000034234836,0.9785057],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981358,0.00011292283,0.000051077448,0.00017941254,0.0005807785,0.0009400231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985801,0.00028530357,0.000029878278,0.00008058939,0.0007011296,0.00032303826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007874918,0.00073576777,0.0006882361,0.0017476095,0.0213594,0.008881679,0.0018259482,0.011072667,0.13417433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036507675,0.0011556008,0.0007923159,0.0011930834,0.0016445653,0.0012865253,0.0021996107,0.008151405,0.018615942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069233865,0.000050984072,0.0013218621,0.000073637384,0.000016319096,0.0010476254,0.00083292817,0.00013389338,0.00026696146,0.05264029,0.9295989,0.013947426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033368367,0.000015965872,0.007286478,0.00021821793,0.000024417153,0.00015580065,0.0016643987,0.00024744152,0.00023793789,0.0035469907,0.98652214,0.000046771856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89831316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9797015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13417433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023333235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03990871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44885784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385589498","doi":"10.59962/9780774868280-012","title":"10 Te Supreme Court of Canada’s “Gang of Five”","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01913731721462377,"score_gpt":0.20017066924607907,"score_spread":0.1810333520314553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385589498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014603375,0.0038858985,0.0006042053,0.054755267,0.0016559536,0.00007713534,0.00043181283,0.000041269308,0.92394507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18609555,0.0011212709,0.0004051755,0.028796317,0.00021431281,0.000077502315,0.00013227502,0.00006945852,0.7830881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960526,0.00036598454,0.000048392845,0.00030261255,0.0009860524,0.0022442846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984479,0.0003393094,0.0000326385,0.000070391005,0.00068258203,0.00042718597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015344423,0.00068440416,0.00061911246,0.0016766933,0.046320204,0.0128723495,0.0024056106,0.0128203025,0.02626647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047413795,0.00066302594,0.0006544452,0.0018694841,0.008423549,0.002469997,0.0027979626,0.013869798,0.0020056427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018008983,0.00002268201,0.0005319706,0.00002070257,0.0000066062075,0.00022597807,0.0035465583,0.00015329753,0.000071735594,0.65960765,0.32862407,0.007170824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019421746,0.000008910063,0.0022039646,0.00020553684,0.000022130505,0.000081918544,0.008367063,0.00033923803,0.0002753578,0.038043372,0.95037794,0.000055067674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98318726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071593404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.071593404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12217537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51944894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385590553","doi":"10.59962/9780774865982-004","title":"Métis Identity Captured by Law: Struggles over Use of the Category Métis in Canadian Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Identity (music); Political science; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.023434191374725345,"score_gpt":0.2167010319692788,"score_spread":0.19326684059455346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385590553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3761023,0.0038596564,0.0010921549,0.057291992,0.00032041248,0.00007408935,0.00030304294,0.00003444913,0.5609219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9451043,0.0012534921,0.00038112514,0.0024071236,0.0000269643,0.000030828225,0.00008127401,0.00004304,0.050671883],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888432,0.0019337677,0.00018168034,0.00068309566,0.0038304273,0.00452794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917596,0.002298698,0.00047178502,0.00023795835,0.0029862737,0.002245569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006391981,0.00030646592,0.0005858216,0.0039280867,0.059392646,0.020987311,0.0031623063,0.003910217,0.0097690765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01590843,0.00061460165,0.00030374937,0.00800025,0.0248936,0.00638126,0.0077333567,0.0073431814,0.00050508184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002963314,0.000036301397,0.008266523,0.0000319114,0.000006372549,0.00025690976,0.6569099,0.00008037366,0.00021397255,0.26383123,0.02787954,0.042457305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005259162,0.000012730167,0.020191053,0.0002465698,0.000012524702,0.00011533362,0.8075433,0.00021397282,0.00017876513,0.011899801,0.15953048,0.00005021442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9941075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14363632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14363632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21343738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385593961","doi":"10.59962/9780774836340-047","title":"Publications of the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04157281743456436,"score_gpt":0.2213675569662526,"score_spread":0.17979473953168823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385593961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010912146,0.027025394,0.0003561359,0.013193949,0.0037854887,0.000051237446,0.0035223798,0.0001957684,0.95077837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0063514584,0.0082992595,0.00034627985,0.00052385294,0.00022280517,0.000017907465,0.0007873701,0.000114904644,0.9833361],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787056,0.00010403855,0.000054318713,0.00016351117,0.001416125,0.0003913193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99643964,0.0002996418,0.00008449207,0.00026390492,0.0023105456,0.00060174306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014159995,0.00090963166,0.00071256043,0.007970647,0.009712631,0.011502092,0.0012554337,0.0020322779,0.19581458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046257204,0.00057678955,0.00036237357,0.011544631,0.0029335876,0.0031116267,0.0021707718,0.0026827748,0.024605824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067243705,0.0000052259493,0.00017161468,0.00006704293,0.0000020009386,0.000026394247,0.000495982,0.000030566225,0.000034710636,0.042368732,0.91622514,0.040565863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.5010556e-7,4.37281e-7,0.00040973604,0.000058960162,0.0000012200784,0.000010162314,0.0002052197,0.000013273636,0.000016406939,0.0012075398,0.9980725,0.0000037192606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9286638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9759832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19581458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04534226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09508277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65506506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385597739","doi":"10.59962/9780774867450-017","title":"Publications of the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.035267209067281056,"score_gpt":0.21022238197372434,"score_spread":0.17495517290644327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385597739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011728355,0.026276898,0.0003445522,0.013554714,0.0033927672,0.000057121535,0.0047554574,0.00020997104,0.9502357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005337397,0.007071978,0.0003223562,0.00045777883,0.00016019194,0.000016978032,0.00085189135,0.000100594814,0.98568094],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801254,0.000102025995,0.000051095547,0.0001602954,0.0013091898,0.0003649488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965803,0.0002825059,0.00008354817,0.00023887091,0.002265647,0.00054908544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012965414,0.0009062811,0.0006977378,0.007646258,0.00955424,0.010822649,0.0012526505,0.0019962424,0.21703874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004334629,0.00062314596,0.00036375198,0.011940339,0.0025682026,0.0028541447,0.0018950856,0.0025659571,0.027574848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007087644,0.000005032146,0.00018021435,0.00006486665,0.0000019622958,0.000024647668,0.00039985505,0.000028890283,0.000032572145,0.031663906,0.93057853,0.037012428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.472678e-7,4.7176988e-7,0.00050155295,0.000055790053,0.0000012756132,0.000009751058,0.00019899056,0.000015072806,0.000016051117,0.0009268246,0.99826956,0.0000038589083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9455296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9816522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21703874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045120765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08907427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72606695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385599155","doi":"10.59962/9780774880442-007","title":"The New Face of Aboriginal Law in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Law; Political science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.014122107906269311,"score_gpt":0.21158810888310858,"score_spread":0.19746600097683928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385599155","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054766968,0.0577063,0.00072378316,0.10691896,0.0016502592,0.00006465409,0.00031668256,0.0000874331,0.777765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49175063,0.03905857,0.0015833972,0.016330356,0.00032584302,0.00005984612,0.00014752115,0.00013469244,0.45060915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709165,0.00031236035,0.00004401344,0.0001660999,0.001013101,0.0013728738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757713,0.00045229157,0.00006813493,0.00007051437,0.0009978985,0.0008341115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014732378,0.0004551202,0.0005695012,0.0024874287,0.034674667,0.018664785,0.0022469864,0.0041014287,0.014651713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036757537,0.0005971151,0.00033072074,0.005205213,0.01324961,0.0025688808,0.003367643,0.0072207693,0.0006542871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003209272,0.000040097002,0.002380318,0.00016449494,0.000017536724,0.0006855483,0.05368135,0.00047744944,0.00023071558,0.6793168,0.20460387,0.05836967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009427077,0.000010061108,0.0057413736,0.0003781556,0.000022615937,0.00016340769,0.053217046,0.00040580812,0.00013526304,0.023980878,0.9158854,0.000050675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99933714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18989767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18989767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3775426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93960387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385599621","doi":"10.59962/9780774834407-009","title":"Appendix A: Abortion and the Canada Health Act","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Appendix; History; Geography; Biology; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.02051513913891187,"score_gpt":0.22597679570084706,"score_spread":0.20546165656193519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385599621","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005347938,0.008133487,0.00034030312,0.008030328,0.001934439,0.00042834415,0.026424538,0.00018797752,0.9539858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040690443,0.0058357283,0.00058817933,0.0032604288,0.00044783636,0.00026683754,0.0050407927,0.00012854437,0.9803626],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863714,0.00012145781,0.00007090519,0.00009591843,0.00085059454,0.00022393838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99442494,0.001859208,0.00016066927,0.00025483457,0.0027872515,0.0005131057],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009165582,0.0011191181,0.0009873464,0.006620628,0.006481633,0.0047591054,0.0025395984,0.005931682,0.35887504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00680407,0.00079995784,0.00051528314,0.0122161,0.001681771,0.0018374702,0.0012484655,0.0031338509,0.06134407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003893824,0.000012958427,0.000060594717,0.00007645082,9.982407e-7,0.00002787616,0.00009202736,0.00008161612,0.000017908978,0.010832878,0.98165476,0.0071380157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008336097,0.0000031651184,0.0013295753,0.00023211911,0.0000030003227,0.000033663684,0.00016044294,0.000049525188,0.000038801096,0.0027160777,0.9954106,0.0000145464855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8966958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.948941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35887504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034939606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06375065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91448694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385600489","doi":"10.59962/9780774831956","title":"Parole in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.014879975383194327,"score_gpt":0.19678598679248432,"score_spread":0.18190601140929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385600489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011381599,0.030880928,0.0007108834,0.027715236,0.002216231,0.00007430619,0.0006501822,0.00019385935,0.92617667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12754658,0.023473535,0.00093972473,0.011140012,0.00021291309,0.000062454,0.0005097077,0.00016325017,0.83595175],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985795,0.00010946172,0.000024638553,0.00012881283,0.00064932456,0.00050826406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990596,0.00012207146,0.00002237025,0.00003641367,0.00049701694,0.00026251868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055968,0.00030118492,0.00035861865,0.0012049794,0.020263968,0.004516633,0.0011233793,0.0022030533,0.0244904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018278898,0.00030326645,0.0002952821,0.0023905083,0.0039696144,0.0013270419,0.0021547023,0.0025781216,0.0036142168],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017815106,0.000017867374,0.0009652083,0.00015849383,0.000003014976,0.00041139667,0.010842219,0.00019749271,0.00034799927,0.21754435,0.68446565,0.08502856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017711841,0.0000041456187,0.001389624,0.00011947401,0.0000022377826,0.000092809474,0.0022365206,0.000041815318,0.00006570385,0.0013758682,0.99465656,0.000013448712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98023087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9935913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06657963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06657963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12521164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48307133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385601142","doi":"10.59962/9780774829618-007","title":"The Baby and the Bathwater: The Repeal of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.01852682353061394,"score_gpt":0.20894901184026365,"score_spread":0.19042218830964971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385601142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011671291,0.014621075,0.0004798818,0.11248819,0.0027669752,0.00006863305,0.0003040889,0.000052112086,0.8575477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1465517,0.005287412,0.00059666677,0.060538992,0.00041097487,0.000066947345,0.000105620784,0.00015145575,0.7862902],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99249846,0.0007366865,0.00010517187,0.00035445293,0.0032319275,0.0030732707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967892,0.0010680252,0.00011107711,0.00015372047,0.0010831383,0.00079487055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003962596,0.00048349405,0.0006296482,0.0010212064,0.0225853,0.010219767,0.0027159746,0.013812872,0.02131823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010923867,0.0008500613,0.00046041343,0.0018007536,0.013636779,0.0030314843,0.0037704166,0.014799688,0.0023331405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037180067,0.000022459635,0.00060449255,0.00006246967,0.000007483193,0.00029207944,0.018123323,0.0001115595,0.00021303134,0.4715484,0.48360336,0.025374142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013383639,0.000009597385,0.0032707846,0.00028917362,0.000015276755,0.00006401055,0.00929361,0.000072258525,0.00020296912,0.010593729,0.9761245,0.00005068632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.982913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067435086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.067435086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20083952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48927808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385721707","doi":"10.59962/9780774814904","title":"A Perilous Imbalance","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.01933159360477415,"score_gpt":0.21629161030160346,"score_spread":0.1969600166968293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385721707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008637331,0.011779612,0.0015683658,0.046379365,0.0022716918,0.000037100264,0.00011323152,0.00018064481,0.9290326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24742909,0.011230707,0.001885134,0.026597593,0.00073996483,0.000073560004,0.00020104962,0.00025574624,0.7115872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955711,0.0004118738,0.00005082396,0.00047045766,0.0021848434,0.0013110422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987791,0.00013927558,0.00004558857,0.00011729276,0.0005813286,0.00033747582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014474998,0.0007777724,0.00046292334,0.0023206384,0.02461231,0.014067919,0.0013506511,0.0025018407,0.013978932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028523703,0.00031786406,0.0003837898,0.003133459,0.026502905,0.0065049077,0.0054575144,0.0054646493,0.0018275297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015462714,0.000012786051,0.0004748024,0.00005705042,0.0000049642686,0.00017032045,0.024478907,0.0000796444,0.00023393016,0.77309906,0.16227382,0.03909918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027637311,0.000005313212,0.000650505,0.00011118824,0.000003924676,0.00009448499,0.010951403,0.00006407757,0.000051985407,0.026703348,0.96135163,0.000009474462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8190669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8785879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18093312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05420438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06390075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39328212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385744818","doi":"10.59962/9780774827515-020","title":"Publications of the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.030985430945418103,"score_gpt":0.20565707425916566,"score_spread":0.17467164331374754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385744818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011892681,0.028734779,0.00039137626,0.014062818,0.003775037,0.000056225737,0.004010669,0.00020690104,0.947573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006357419,0.008221923,0.0003787746,0.00052342797,0.00020940595,0.000018735178,0.00081988086,0.00011091966,0.9833596],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786574,0.00010823694,0.000055959703,0.00016795253,0.0014152238,0.00038695915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99650025,0.00029491525,0.00008486425,0.00025137924,0.0022967202,0.0005719273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014240512,0.0009027623,0.0007157053,0.008183721,0.009589885,0.011005269,0.0012756183,0.002002243,0.19279082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004649784,0.0005902973,0.0003658128,0.011750164,0.002799333,0.0030528682,0.0020725075,0.0025832006,0.02273537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071108625,0.000005373486,0.00018310147,0.0000674362,0.00000214132,0.000025323836,0.00047519454,0.000031598694,0.00003425194,0.039239455,0.917976,0.041953065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.0435857e-7,4.83242e-7,0.0004773819,0.00005922256,0.0000013595409,0.000010296836,0.0002051546,0.000014332681,0.000017216547,0.0011618278,0.99804807,0.00000402066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9339566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9778047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19279082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04575016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09353956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64494956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385745490","doi":"10.59962/9780774818605-016","title":"Publications of the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.04406115400459649,"score_gpt":0.20605329663476699,"score_spread":0.1619921426301705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385745490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012901006,0.030587891,0.00041164018,0.015148769,0.00395798,0.0000617384,0.0049410625,0.00022338053,0.9433774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0064629926,0.008786749,0.0003946779,0.0005111702,0.00020738407,0.00001946454,0.0009627848,0.00010910337,0.9825455],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792093,0.00010620917,0.000056873152,0.00016857241,0.0013700837,0.00037742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99631065,0.00029991806,0.00009046154,0.00026917603,0.0024499772,0.00057977735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001399515,0.0009117024,0.00072298764,0.007922808,0.009589251,0.010767605,0.0012650585,0.0019430094,0.19732623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047112224,0.0006034387,0.00036523698,0.011863212,0.0026449075,0.002972595,0.0019625793,0.0025568486,0.02343704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073918586,0.0000052636983,0.00019541195,0.00007035145,0.0000021639478,0.000025646626,0.00046255768,0.000030930518,0.00003406974,0.034702156,0.92310846,0.041355688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.440916e-7,5.023399e-7,0.0005389679,0.00006165602,0.0000014441661,0.000010845582,0.00021048154,0.000014939082,0.000017743203,0.0010615078,0.9980769,0.0000041806866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9411554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9805697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19732623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044962447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.092235595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66012204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385747433","doi":"10.59962/9780774824149-012","title":"Pathways for Greening Canada’s Constitution","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Greening; Constitution; Geography; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04053576557805497,"score_gpt":0.21098778235236873,"score_spread":0.17045201677431376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385747433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0125056,0.0034006587,0.0017261185,0.089880414,0.0012847354,0.00013050323,0.0003205715,0.000096804724,0.89065456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31092525,0.0030709829,0.0034832298,0.035295118,0.00023038148,0.00015809518,0.00021966716,0.00022664445,0.6463906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943539,0.00066794496,0.00007567876,0.00035155402,0.0018913415,0.0026595963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966125,0.00062002934,0.00006189688,0.0002342277,0.001492311,0.0009790278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035610858,0.00060385984,0.00047237755,0.0028894988,0.027740905,0.021120047,0.0018893569,0.009265189,0.032106597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009218433,0.00063715695,0.00065765245,0.0030605623,0.011895149,0.0049018944,0.0048829652,0.013294764,0.0017204431],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000083516,0.00001734859,0.0002826963,0.000014826502,0.0000054259285,0.00008579304,0.002408565,0.0001950161,0.000065602646,0.88615423,0.09994995,0.010812202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017017752,0.0000065301156,0.0012289077,0.00015064195,0.000009827146,0.000032920878,0.003937511,0.0002635521,0.00016936386,0.08524668,0.9088925,0.000044505985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98229724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99179476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12296305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12296305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31434864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8921635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385747660","doi":"10.59962/9780774816762-015","title":"The Road Not Taken: Aboriginal Rights after the Re-Imagining of the Canadian Constitutional Order","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Political science; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.015148162067506884,"score_gpt":0.22150571228528743,"score_spread":0.20635755021778054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385747660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018239053,0.018125197,0.00096938503,0.10468036,0.0018189894,0.000041722065,0.00015304862,0.000047652728,0.8559246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50244933,0.008808682,0.0015062061,0.021489985,0.0004630742,0.000063077416,0.00009005348,0.00019146834,0.4649381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956524,0.0008250331,0.00006435749,0.00033907098,0.0012226573,0.0018965974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973757,0.0008132408,0.00006488722,0.00018571406,0.0010847611,0.0004756461],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035066898,0.000546101,0.00065209146,0.0016385519,0.032627877,0.015531052,0.0019978858,0.006396789,0.010307464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064804447,0.00049436756,0.0003569776,0.0027578415,0.037248276,0.005868159,0.003299247,0.010599118,0.0007980422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016302813,0.000007354213,0.00016153336,0.000035882764,0.0000034115956,0.000095154115,0.037915844,0.00009420325,0.00007731527,0.890616,0.060977943,0.009999159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014153963,0.000008991694,0.0016437771,0.00035527095,0.000020488971,0.000084133455,0.046892416,0.00016707365,0.00021933515,0.119689144,0.83084804,0.00005726558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99041116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11197109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11197109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19214202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8124109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385854099","doi":"10.59962/9780774851060-017","title":"Publications of the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; History","score_opus":0.032643504860937964,"score_gpt":0.21001738045300103,"score_spread":0.17737387559206308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385854099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014050578,0.031225946,0.00043096638,0.015166517,0.003784969,0.00006612721,0.006012093,0.0002456638,0.94166255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0066758874,0.008822968,0.00042493502,0.0005051419,0.00019302973,0.000020213403,0.0011547076,0.00010875499,0.98209435],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980242,0.00010015939,0.00005542902,0.00015942295,0.0013112223,0.00034958162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961643,0.00029219978,0.00009384487,0.00026497676,0.00260813,0.0005764902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001376022,0.0008977135,0.0007116077,0.008374353,0.009072378,0.010210471,0.0012448587,0.001806564,0.19955152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047088354,0.0005990766,0.0003545756,0.012504905,0.0024158063,0.0028738247,0.0017780386,0.002385122,0.023236496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075197595,0.0000052950313,0.00021105673,0.00006813556,0.0000021656906,0.00002418567,0.0004321553,0.000029666046,0.000031472606,0.030543465,0.92765534,0.04098957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.125224e-7,5.405778e-7,0.0006408977,0.00006353559,0.0000015884373,0.000010823284,0.00021628948,0.000016389276,0.000018513289,0.001022679,0.99800366,0.0000042537904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94585687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98166406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19955152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04481499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.089763895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66756636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385863077","doi":"10.59962/9780774857222-015","title":"From Time Immemorial: The Recognition of Aboriginal Customary Law in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; History; Genealogy; Political science","score_opus":0.014961581696086388,"score_gpt":0.2055908906746799,"score_spread":0.1906293089785935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385863077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22725043,0.028779047,0.0008112487,0.11147205,0.0014833835,0.00012353332,0.00039510799,0.00005571642,0.6296296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7762775,0.010899746,0.0007031012,0.009034152,0.000096906304,0.00004300101,0.00010098702,0.000077660094,0.20276701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958547,0.00040235254,0.00008136116,0.00025837054,0.0015272578,0.001875951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961747,0.00074737315,0.00014986173,0.00009426069,0.0016556154,0.0011781233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021063106,0.00032831152,0.00055197073,0.0022668873,0.041170634,0.014997529,0.0025679523,0.004237036,0.008683309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060523334,0.0006130175,0.0003081929,0.004667344,0.014483536,0.0023867267,0.0039612222,0.008546152,0.0004276616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053254906,0.00005887645,0.0083500035,0.00015679887,0.000023567802,0.0012136872,0.29653347,0.0004302909,0.0005000333,0.48808348,0.13290904,0.071687475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014235902,0.000020410394,0.029175704,0.00058237615,0.000035533714,0.00033604007,0.27493873,0.0004641824,0.0004270221,0.013749234,0.6801358,0.000120713106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99870265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20080519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20080519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42196295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9269527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385867979","doi":"10.59962/9780774856010-001","title":"Preface","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.030437995115857715,"score_gpt":0.21732785829788376,"score_spread":0.18688986318202605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385867979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005762918,0.0036765959,0.0011012733,0.014367121,0.04819878,0.00022502201,0.0054931366,0.00061222364,0.9257496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021718289,0.0018679596,0.00048079912,0.002753692,0.003736614,0.0000658312,0.0031681624,0.00025308057,0.985502],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990528,0.00008126571,0.000043486954,0.0001706102,0.0004964777,0.00015529644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970908,0.00022717181,0.000066720844,0.00022981326,0.0017969493,0.00058856717],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010169089,0.0007337819,0.00060675835,0.0017209208,0.0045027314,0.0045669074,0.001450575,0.001689347,0.569614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004767981,0.00033613865,0.0005183299,0.0021344188,0.0008950189,0.0028847805,0.0023496777,0.002955339,0.34481987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001093926,0.0000076710685,0.00006955311,0.000048398524,7.170151e-7,0.000028424984,0.00006872528,0.000018129154,0.00006228792,0.004469729,0.97467303,0.020542432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010579154,0.0000029305186,0.00015292587,0.000031975713,3.3667698e-7,0.00001590501,0.000060101418,0.000006586565,0.000016124448,0.00035637652,0.9993542,0.0000015339941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05920599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.083212934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.430386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052351924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006488789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385868121","doi":"10.59962/9780774855129","title":"Diversity and Equality","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Geography; Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.04188262165677856,"score_gpt":0.24561378599166434,"score_spread":0.20373116433488578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385868121","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018388602,0.011126879,0.0013979815,0.012567145,0.0007118678,0.000019270814,0.000025866828,0.000013134436,0.97229904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35974324,0.012748038,0.0033156048,0.015498309,0.0020193905,0.00017476483,0.00010465854,0.000104734325,0.6062912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963846,0.0016455677,0.00009340066,0.00042935472,0.0008405451,0.00060645805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912256,0.00035288392,0.000047374495,0.00016325669,0.0001594043,0.0001545844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020448004,0.00047909256,0.00056804507,0.0011185186,0.008548807,0.00873634,0.00074458646,0.0021837999,0.013195146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029756266,0.00021770087,0.00030379603,0.0010810441,0.027370954,0.008076129,0.007997412,0.004444074,0.0021686864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002351844,0.0000030184422,0.000043696964,0.000013297722,0.0000011786394,0.00001583022,0.0020760165,0.000027435739,0.000020656069,0.9812991,0.009946484,0.0065509332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042327224,0.0000072014077,0.00019435544,0.00014240138,0.0000019901245,0.000074381765,0.0015753552,0.00004243949,0.000047751328,0.45418894,0.54371667,0.0000042150828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009507071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012329734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013195146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008287757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005129403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060132146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385868998","doi":"10.59962/9780774855525-010","title":"Inuit Petition for Their Rights","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027881253782759515,"score_gpt":0.21435235581173104,"score_spread":0.18647110202897152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385868998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021243274,0.0013641678,0.00038163594,0.018734945,0.0015504583,0.000070432776,0.00027279323,0.00007087966,0.95631135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.055702183,0.00037838813,0.00013034137,0.008166771,0.00010540228,0.000037173162,0.000079192774,0.000041578714,0.935359],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982186,0.00014271218,0.00004530427,0.00011294093,0.0005114932,0.00096896314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893147,0.00033544176,0.00003552321,0.000113166,0.00032333162,0.00026117134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012141394,0.00034653879,0.00067955104,0.000836958,0.016498253,0.006475335,0.0013495159,0.006909271,0.065567754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003584936,0.00045266285,0.00033424833,0.0009061098,0.0023548477,0.002038365,0.0028192315,0.009265435,0.009786879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057424702,0.000119741235,0.0022692478,0.000073713614,0.000012379762,0.0011267033,0.016794879,0.000058246347,0.0007672436,0.30876166,0.6195883,0.050370462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007940641,0.000014923929,0.002929694,0.0001316946,0.0000131457255,0.00025427953,0.0075040194,0.000096328615,0.000476232,0.0061702924,0.982381,0.000020479953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6210288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047219265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012442936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65645665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385870735","doi":"10.59962/9780774818667-013","title":"Publications of the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03032193610760755,"score_gpt":0.2077350729438286,"score_spread":0.17741313683622104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385870735","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001338512,0.029204344,0.00039621073,0.014634648,0.003754467,0.00005932331,0.0050967075,0.0002239812,0.9452919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006556112,0.008540317,0.00039040134,0.0004996212,0.00019612789,0.000018717732,0.0009835308,0.00010706667,0.98270816],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980071,0.0000994501,0.00005410258,0.00016193968,0.0013181433,0.00035929875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99634415,0.0002928155,0.00008972189,0.00025920477,0.0024428559,0.0005713187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013562746,0.0009093077,0.0007085071,0.007988985,0.009299068,0.010462226,0.0012524119,0.001882031,0.19577055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046144803,0.0005970297,0.0003597737,0.011953961,0.0025360894,0.0029462818,0.0018683777,0.0024876902,0.0230508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007667416,0.0000053688896,0.00020628779,0.0000694132,0.000002194781,0.000025970465,0.00045218112,0.0000311117,0.000035009325,0.033323098,0.92489845,0.04094322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.8546e-7,5.2191297e-7,0.0005850614,0.000061073704,0.0000015281557,0.000011272412,0.00021576424,0.000016105123,0.000018762974,0.0010607464,0.9980241,0.0000042349016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94452965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9817324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19577055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045319498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.091734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6549177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385871457","doi":"10.59962/9780774818667-009","title":"Judges of the British Columbia Court of Appeal, 1909–2009","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.018072619355742465,"score_gpt":0.20858697680260938,"score_spread":0.1905143574468669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385871457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10278119,0.025407664,0.00051110575,0.066032805,0.0024657066,0.00018480087,0.003570604,0.00010752665,0.7989386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32433528,0.004668769,0.00036805382,0.0106706545,0.0002569451,0.00010057642,0.0006855869,0.00010608632,0.6588081],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964328,0.00031702247,0.00011159899,0.00037489098,0.0012607848,0.001502904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947968,0.0009049632,0.00016712474,0.0001397612,0.0031283314,0.0008630509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019100633,0.00045450736,0.00053917064,0.002756069,0.0295858,0.00828204,0.0025294952,0.006335736,0.017897058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011055726,0.001320901,0.00030818643,0.003889953,0.00439089,0.0017002634,0.0019518343,0.00917739,0.0024448598],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100541765,0.000052164258,0.006166685,0.00010395692,0.00003503746,0.0010544009,0.011493142,0.00042216014,0.00046780947,0.07125109,0.8676688,0.041184124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022513148,0.000012329778,0.050620675,0.00047135615,0.00005370147,0.00014327113,0.010608553,0.0003770511,0.0005880494,0.0047988724,0.93217653,0.00012698653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98335844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10896009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10896009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09548734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79056454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385989711","doi":"10.22215/cjcr.v10i1.4231","title":"Decolonizing Discipline: The Normalization of Violence Against Children, Church Parties to the Settlement Agreement, and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s Call to Action 6","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Children s Rights / Revue canadienne des droits des enfants","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Colonialism; Law; Corporal punishment; Commission; Power (physics); Normalization (sociology); Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Faith; Social science; Theology","score_opus":0.024486361631096812,"score_gpt":0.2781286725375885,"score_spread":0.2536423109064917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385989711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31479922,0.011176363,0.0050723683,0.20222022,0.0009373425,0.0002185092,0.00010170309,0.0000992727,0.46537507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96049094,0.0011844506,0.0014849151,0.009871218,0.00007430461,0.00007520724,0.000019125435,0.00005470008,0.026745146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98471224,0.006263806,0.00036225602,0.0009056443,0.0031847416,0.0045713517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920799,0.0033594528,0.0009712609,0.00072358,0.0015179884,0.0013477687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012717684,0.00035254768,0.0005898921,0.0011469102,0.031366244,0.013027533,0.0023954588,0.0057871314,0.0022240872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019437453,0.0003953207,0.00036646638,0.0015451213,0.08280361,0.00556497,0.010516307,0.012344782,0.00021490474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010927493,0.000018100951,0.0016363923,0.00003811706,0.0000061057312,0.0003365178,0.2648376,0.0001255,0.00018635481,0.7074244,0.0110067995,0.014373184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003525322,0.000056992892,0.0132468315,0.00062005536,0.000028557399,0.0004776769,0.28253356,0.00039801415,0.0016516086,0.10976619,0.5910531,0.00013212553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7649673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88054955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23503268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08491677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12791449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6161172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386038996","doi":"10.55400/iayfjmaimjf.v1i1.29","title":"CHILD PARTICIPATION IN FAMILY AND CHILD PROTECTION MATTERS IN ONTARIO, CANADA","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Chronicle - The International Association of Youth and Family Judges and Magistrates´ Journal on Justice & Children´s Rights","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child protection; Political science; Family law; Economic Justice; Criminology; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.01626860685788847,"score_gpt":0.24719988425341893,"score_spread":0.23093127739553046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386038996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94040805,0.0036085465,0.00016058751,0.008233316,0.000066288165,0.00013687031,0.00283496,0.000018605104,0.044532876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780186,0.0026655148,0.00027884863,0.00061331224,0.000014206822,0.000059258975,0.00062881527,0.000011627771,0.01770982],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972036,0.00029456383,0.00009264558,0.00017846802,0.0007383832,0.0014924203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99459696,0.00046334788,0.0007449033,0.00010513134,0.0015981881,0.0024914125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012126832,0.0002007479,0.00041838706,0.0014439566,0.015678087,0.0029418012,0.001589374,0.0007172997,0.0044985935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003043801,0.00038848308,0.0003750494,0.0050017224,0.0025222076,0.0007812615,0.002428182,0.0012570741,0.0002467414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020364975,0.00019194941,0.62565416,0.00052959623,0.000081068254,0.0019819965,0.24421169,0.0005684253,0.00081466854,0.01881161,0.0367232,0.07022795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014393846,0.000028012913,0.8631056,0.0002863908,0.000018949027,0.00018228378,0.08144336,0.00021666977,0.00011244216,0.00034182187,0.05420948,0.000040602044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12075069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12075069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18086892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8761117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386039010","doi":"10.55400/iayfjmaimjf.v1i1.30","title":"CHILD PARTICIPATION IN FAMILY AND CHILD PROTECTION MATTERS IN QUÉBEC, CANADA","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Chronicle - The International Association of Youth and Family Judges and Magistrates´ Journal on Justice & Children´s Rights","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child protection; Political science; Economic Justice; Family law; Law","score_opus":0.014408791584103462,"score_gpt":0.25150659434135186,"score_spread":0.2370978027572484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386039010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94019705,0.005805027,0.00026436232,0.00915738,0.00009262112,0.0001112464,0.0037014987,0.000027543347,0.0406433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810554,0.0021668514,0.00026910295,0.0007945778,0.000014138401,0.000047104862,0.0007316787,0.000010748586,0.014910403],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981791,0.0003165038,0.000051561503,0.00015309591,0.00036035248,0.0009394894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960341,0.00046086457,0.00042277237,0.00007646892,0.0012522247,0.00175362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012758444,0.00020739606,0.00033801488,0.0012770431,0.011699298,0.0027074148,0.00164718,0.0007980711,0.006542754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002361026,0.00024448303,0.00033980046,0.003659956,0.0018343794,0.0007471143,0.0016306124,0.001386149,0.0003016545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022119578,0.000330694,0.70959365,0.0004384453,0.00013022975,0.0017926267,0.09620968,0.0010587962,0.0007730622,0.020532906,0.057519972,0.11139877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015139564,0.00003508947,0.9116224,0.000333969,0.000023366245,0.00019208371,0.043286383,0.0004813586,0.00014028279,0.00028857435,0.043530643,0.000050674327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9992779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99978584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09406424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09406424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.098199055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.682487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386166647","doi":"10.59962/9780774854207-005","title":"3 “There Seemed to Be No Recognized Law”: Canadian Law and the Prairie First Nations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.030460997012020718,"score_gpt":0.22434199148943126,"score_spread":0.19388099447741056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386166647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014574345,0.015488514,0.00066823745,0.094360195,0.0015585514,0.000070175185,0.00041383525,0.000050384308,0.8728158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22992237,0.006562258,0.0010937478,0.033234917,0.00026117524,0.00006959019,0.00016586971,0.00009580248,0.72859424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998139,0.00019707534,0.00002872502,0.00018968062,0.00054406386,0.00090153393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989255,0.00031196405,0.00004056049,0.00003997944,0.00044395454,0.00023804193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012807039,0.0006518498,0.00037965536,0.0015169921,0.033278298,0.012777947,0.0019852426,0.008600735,0.02543486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003252632,0.00062104943,0.00041315932,0.0031081603,0.014461798,0.004260846,0.0027158868,0.008491183,0.001187651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011475377,0.000019716308,0.0009439972,0.00006831409,0.000004582843,0.00025668275,0.030991158,0.00010876979,0.00008612452,0.7196098,0.23126777,0.016631607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007510795,0.000006524646,0.003639376,0.00029659673,0.0000095782225,0.00010237214,0.019747846,0.000110531495,0.00011092791,0.021940444,0.9539796,0.000048707312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99498355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07749236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07749236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15354784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56224906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386326870","doi":"10.1093/he/9780191995729.003.0017","title":"Entick v Carrington [1765] 95 ER 807, King’s Bench","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Warrant; Law; Government (linguistics); History; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.049387351197851086,"score_gpt":0.2575753733690231,"score_spread":0.208188022171172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386326870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024884895,0.011147926,0.0004017228,0.023046905,0.0014670506,0.000066904584,0.00018862425,0.00003121945,0.96116126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060784813,0.004057871,0.00046374573,0.050907414,0.00061826577,0.00019497982,0.00010750427,0.00006246484,0.88280296],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979214,0.0003624315,0.00009927773,0.0003404706,0.00078302977,0.0004933809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999368,0.0003017585,0.000060630795,0.00004112917,0.00016658076,0.00006195518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018485246,0.00080193457,0.0003832901,0.0016594399,0.007269705,0.0066801826,0.0016189704,0.013169639,0.030846082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050287168,0.00066716503,0.00033932363,0.0015007512,0.006293906,0.0046173544,0.0023432092,0.009070848,0.007341492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017663624,0.000010102772,0.00013757712,0.00007297411,0.000003044647,0.00030603292,0.0029765542,0.000047623795,0.00011791657,0.47536388,0.51235217,0.00859443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007424912,0.000007731518,0.0004059974,0.00025639115,0.0000045945894,0.000094107374,0.00077366957,0.000027520597,0.00013386775,0.013628844,0.9846422,0.000017683164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24597625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3796734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24597625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015572188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008354115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48908907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386429488","doi":"10.35589/swlj.2023.14.1.147","title":"The Development of Canada’s Duty to Accommodate and Its National Implications","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Social Welfare and Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Charter; Dignity; Human rights; Law; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Fundamental rights; Bill of rights; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology","score_opus":0.05470953112451685,"score_gpt":0.3480253252977206,"score_spread":0.29331579417320375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386429488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051129065,0.0049996153,0.0024888013,0.31586197,0.0013934831,0.000098432574,0.00069978076,0.00007406706,0.62325484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78419113,0.0031286196,0.003648441,0.05188215,0.0003911789,0.00010107725,0.0003005558,0.00008137322,0.1562755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872944,0.0017532565,0.0003105585,0.0012455663,0.0038754474,0.0055207247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860135,0.0024428198,0.00059164857,0.00044607412,0.0059471414,0.004558827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063131917,0.00042176843,0.00048038078,0.0022314005,0.029707517,0.015952263,0.0024072954,0.0075094546,0.012028876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014338782,0.0005004437,0.00086641725,0.003308771,0.018169537,0.0054470296,0.005742727,0.00750669,0.0006076015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003683767,0.000030332605,0.0047517708,0.00008654885,0.000017556104,0.00024702825,0.009582616,0.00043072324,0.0001444012,0.9042424,0.0649714,0.015458303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000727438,0.000034842695,0.027465194,0.00068946416,0.000043584118,0.00016818492,0.03205042,0.0014029071,0.0004638512,0.09613329,0.84127414,0.00020131211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9909157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17803606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17803606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34703827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95336163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386473838","doi":"10.1017/9781107337909.027","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02812879153745413,"score_gpt":0.2249116400060083,"score_spread":0.19678284846855418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386473838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008004245,0.014340419,0.00045166665,0.06955551,0.0012043094,0.000036113608,0.0002989009,0.000031623185,0.90607715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28604564,0.005820902,0.00058864144,0.032271575,0.00060476625,0.000094067414,0.00017412897,0.00012090112,0.67427933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948243,0.00058278383,0.00007914775,0.0006604197,0.0016755301,0.0021779544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997883,0.000444733,0.000056143544,0.00013026095,0.0010192357,0.0004665678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002045289,0.0007096038,0.0008832146,0.0016492208,0.034263972,0.015528864,0.0023714257,0.010774291,0.025600433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076940595,0.000746678,0.00054515584,0.002762501,0.0123505695,0.004323128,0.0035419734,0.012156219,0.0020942488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014860207,0.000011296104,0.0002579275,0.000020111382,0.000007877007,0.000080690326,0.0016711095,0.0001421889,0.00003635992,0.85563385,0.1364742,0.0056494046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001963589,0.000006657351,0.0011883745,0.00023151026,0.000020845206,0.000042871307,0.0036611771,0.000290202,0.000109864995,0.135559,0.8588213,0.00004847062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97618484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9866876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08976775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08976775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1569791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65131366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386486512","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3896","title":"Assisted Suicide in Canada: Moral, Legal, and Policy Considerations by Travis Dumsday","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Criminal code; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Criminal law","score_opus":0.06244297441591759,"score_gpt":0.3299460171694009,"score_spread":0.26750304275348336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386486512","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014563258,0.034809828,0.00021446346,0.90451646,0.0022037656,0.000047649748,0.00024613718,0.000024506011,0.043373927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37453872,0.06838121,0.0015433108,0.48208308,0.0019244234,0.000105745225,0.00032511834,0.00012516927,0.07097319],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933068,0.0009813631,0.00017219492,0.0004489656,0.0023881355,0.002702625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98642063,0.0032538283,0.00039259534,0.00016401825,0.0054666074,0.00430216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005618126,0.00049225154,0.0007531845,0.002068341,0.03674025,0.011634743,0.0042907842,0.013035138,0.006439316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013537076,0.00068976503,0.0006143188,0.0032636048,0.009983938,0.0024510603,0.0031498368,0.017405268,0.0004483814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006769411,0.000120186916,0.00732112,0.00031014666,0.000050227754,0.0011167005,0.01230491,0.0008179553,0.00023905696,0.23492365,0.7023974,0.040330958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114601775,0.00005054252,0.027417665,0.0021641408,0.00012698042,0.0005164145,0.038400173,0.0014673687,0.0003723463,0.02883462,0.90017205,0.00036316525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99698704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19179356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19179356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.45697516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93740493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386489950","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3612","title":"Acknowledgements","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Executive summary; Law; Library science; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.04208922587348831,"score_gpt":0.3321611717326074,"score_spread":0.2900719458591191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386489950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009477723,0.010112513,0.02464976,0.2951934,0.17187092,0.003139902,0.11866253,0.0035112991,0.36338192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.063887075,0.006882922,0.02000842,0.07637803,0.023736285,0.005218966,0.055389,0.0045100013,0.7439893],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893562,0.0031321284,0.0007127896,0.0010055224,0.0051406524,0.000652575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9210186,0.010768567,0.0021889857,0.004203127,0.05193101,0.00988975],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008837839,0.0008660639,0.0011707258,0.0023603186,0.00293083,0.003558001,0.002177793,0.0012625922,0.30018386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084956296,0.00029569142,0.00042825844,0.0019892268,0.0010803996,0.0020516259,0.0044125593,0.003878658,0.16468714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006378655,0.000015586389,0.00045914977,0.00013101964,0.000003759588,0.00017532097,0.00097585836,0.000032801203,0.0002700562,0.0043336544,0.9774709,0.016068218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015610394,0.000009940509,0.00079714466,0.00021079439,0.0000048822176,0.0002565391,0.0015319394,0.00007228637,0.00013165161,0.002286011,0.9946727,0.000010506121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068966364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010431724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6998161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026987277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007197648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386528062","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3715","title":"A History of Law in Canada, Volume One: Beginnings to 1866 by Philip Girard, Jim Phillips &amp; R. Blake Brown","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.036959184390837604,"score_gpt":0.26028663116237843,"score_spread":0.22332744677154082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386528062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056143897,0.36725026,0.00060106674,0.06448795,0.018305045,0.00010033929,0.0033005313,0.00017816707,0.5401622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050585788,0.18842797,0.0007284068,0.008267338,0.0029229992,0.000034263863,0.00092180556,0.00021771225,0.74789375],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988065,0.000061590916,0.000024934961,0.000070925875,0.0008166341,0.00021947277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998429,0.00014066105,0.000052920313,0.000033243894,0.0009255897,0.00041849524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055863964,0.00069915125,0.00041347943,0.0050107026,0.012176501,0.006841642,0.00085353723,0.0017037783,0.024495777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026350492,0.00045560027,0.00021200014,0.008157418,0.0055596763,0.0024579954,0.0016918007,0.0025239824,0.0034222945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018377044,0.000015310598,0.00074510096,0.0001942413,0.0000034691543,0.0001282902,0.006426364,0.00012324624,0.0001227504,0.031685602,0.904018,0.05651918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.1733167e-7,0.0000012706705,0.00097200234,0.0001200831,9.711687e-7,0.000025522366,0.0006616619,0.000005923891,0.00002120167,0.0005898594,0.9975969,0.000004087432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9569229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9864912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07217266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07217266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.100682825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5236517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386763831","doi":"10.32920/24150465","title":"Is the right to early intervention being honoured? A study of family experiences with early childhood services","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); Legislation; Political science; Dignity; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Early childhood; Medicine; Convention; Economic growth; Public administration; Nursing; Psychology; Human rights; Law; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.03269336570297874,"score_gpt":0.3255775189158946,"score_spread":0.29288415321291583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386763831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873969,0.0014356662,0.00008638582,0.0037436683,0.00004640997,0.000027495738,0.000054068045,0.0000026452672,0.0072068013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99523985,0.0013776436,0.000054415043,0.0006029587,0.000011402292,0.000020914185,0.000025518924,0.0000047974254,0.0026624827],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.995359,0.0021333355,0.00011494836,0.00024680424,0.00053076306,0.0016151408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99188566,0.003710506,0.0012164657,0.00019724944,0.00097260694,0.0020175125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004061285,0.0003806547,0.00061251695,0.0012271999,0.023176972,0.0061862525,0.0017904158,0.0016967398,0.0033513089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01106118,0.00055687677,0.0003192937,0.00248521,0.0125182085,0.004043424,0.004616353,0.003418247,0.00020538784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013497594,0.00002856765,0.009897647,0.000020683141,0.0000025348365,0.00033845348,0.9864422,0.000010339089,0.000051319235,0.00070558436,0.00049992977,0.0019892356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010476226,0.00000978043,0.0062778736,0.000043673037,0.0000016195194,0.00006997765,0.99082476,0.000008793112,0.000014399806,0.00005051196,0.0026930822,0.0000044941835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74646556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8554582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74646556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03023291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027584003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51005507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386763901","doi":"10.32920/24150465.v1","title":"Is the right to early intervention being honoured? A study of family experiences with early childhood services","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); Legislation; Political science; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Dignity; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Early childhood; Early childhood education; Medicine; Convention; Economic growth; Public administration; Psychology; Nursing; Human rights; Law; Pedagogy; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.03269336570297874,"score_gpt":0.3255775189158946,"score_spread":0.29288415321291583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386763901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873969,0.0014356662,0.00008638582,0.0037436683,0.00004640997,0.000027495738,0.000054068045,0.0000026452672,0.0072068013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99523985,0.0013776436,0.000054415043,0.0006029587,0.000011402292,0.000020914185,0.000025518924,0.0000047974254,0.0026624827],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.995359,0.0021333355,0.00011494836,0.00024680424,0.00053076306,0.0016151408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99188566,0.003710506,0.0012164657,0.00019724944,0.00097260694,0.0020175125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004061285,0.0003806547,0.00061251695,0.0012271999,0.023176972,0.0061862525,0.0017904158,0.0016967398,0.0033513089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01106118,0.00055687677,0.0003192937,0.00248521,0.0125182085,0.004043424,0.004616353,0.003418247,0.00020538784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013497594,0.00002856765,0.009897647,0.000020683141,0.0000025348365,0.00033845348,0.9864422,0.000010339089,0.000051319235,0.00070558436,0.00049992977,0.0019892356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010476226,0.00000978043,0.0062778736,0.000043673037,0.0000016195194,0.00006997765,0.99082476,0.000008793112,0.000014399806,0.00005051196,0.0026930822,0.0000044941835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74646556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8554582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74646556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03023291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027584003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51005507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386766368","doi":"10.26443/arc.v45i.345","title":"Charles Taylor and Rowan Williams in Conversation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arc The Journal of the School of Religious Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rowan; Conversation; Psychoanalysis; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Communication; Biology","score_opus":0.0351016766676307,"score_gpt":0.3295473605310182,"score_spread":0.2944456838633875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386766368","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007323489,0.015135952,0.00051356305,0.83742476,0.024078574,0.00002887842,0.000054754288,0.000050894967,0.12198027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031939898,0.01045164,0.00061053823,0.47879517,0.009711039,0.00019329977,0.000053641023,0.00018914528,0.4680556],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532014,0.0024854848,0.00012350861,0.00057962345,0.0008816318,0.0006097027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934815,0.0035379594,0.00023568248,0.00022684305,0.0011750648,0.0013429015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046037277,0.00077477243,0.0006852049,0.0007369393,0.013866471,0.008063356,0.0019826074,0.013460777,0.05274777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017733797,0.00050069485,0.00044635535,0.0009361209,0.0073004346,0.014040551,0.0062653404,0.014030382,0.01750535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010863542,0.000016390575,0.00006312658,0.00004445429,0.0000014909199,0.000112092595,0.004522015,0.00001725248,0.00005139555,0.041976683,0.9468781,0.0063060876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027331473,0.0000028932886,0.00009520086,0.0001329693,8.844454e-7,0.000038435508,0.0059529664,0.000027751199,0.000029129336,0.0067333663,0.9869763,0.0000074374325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016763547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022920325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05274777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057178442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007137938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1764589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387484525","doi":"10.1515/9780887554377-008","title":"First Nations Response to Membership Codes of the Indian Act: Bill C-31 and Cowessess First Nation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Manitoba Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arithmetic; Political science; History; Genealogy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06492221862378553,"score_gpt":0.24009610825607128,"score_spread":0.17517388963228575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387484525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009068284,0.011975227,0.00045340447,0.18208653,0.0066710175,0.00012473714,0.00037758058,0.00007866383,0.7891646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.069916174,0.0038734959,0.00047280954,0.06970126,0.0006285533,0.00018190767,0.00015223905,0.00008572198,0.85498786],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712723,0.0006214723,0.00008622069,0.00018255862,0.000898723,0.0010837578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972965,0.0009965723,0.00013182918,0.00014321294,0.00088693586,0.0005450002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035335987,0.0005881817,0.00044218896,0.0012573849,0.017700173,0.007858458,0.0020821067,0.010118212,0.013096177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008424199,0.0008996032,0.0003988095,0.0020894094,0.005572474,0.002623656,0.0031345885,0.014390347,0.003537972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001634014,0.000046265923,0.00063661323,0.00004644993,0.000004739985,0.00015906348,0.006694409,0.00010669143,0.000105588806,0.28404865,0.6974132,0.010721943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009211873,0.000009167143,0.0031737303,0.00029710395,0.000008076724,0.00007404232,0.007955037,0.00008515232,0.0003044453,0.010366892,0.9776749,0.000042236676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52143544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74767363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47856456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017528828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06047315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9627659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387520397","doi":"10.1017/9781108680929.004","title":"The Promise and Perils of Dialogue","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Legislature; Metaphor; Democracy; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Politics; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0433314759977825,"score_gpt":0.2444252409239487,"score_spread":0.2010937649261662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387520397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02132974,0.028221611,0.0438433,0.16271363,0.0019417824,0.00011786336,0.00008136742,0.00017506075,0.7415757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92628944,0.007877428,0.008837694,0.009588776,0.0016354087,0.0004658659,0.000056602734,0.00017698757,0.045071896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93070894,0.053918462,0.0011806495,0.0029823566,0.008557631,0.0026520796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9602506,0.03261375,0.00093696784,0.0030074667,0.0017617743,0.0014293861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03789342,0.0006526125,0.0010843322,0.0023024555,0.012413511,0.028596943,0.0024706929,0.007089346,0.0055970014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03861626,0.00089678256,0.0007793709,0.0017622387,0.09643206,0.04209666,0.019028576,0.015035417,0.0013876244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066526068,0.000003205922,0.000023504033,0.000027789576,0.0000014401878,0.000022228141,0.008379551,0.00004231085,0.000031378855,0.988591,0.00064095214,0.0022299748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014041336,0.000018664816,0.000064356434,0.00020540335,0.000003896317,0.00008714379,0.007866609,0.00025326997,0.000084017905,0.8824649,0.10892362,0.000014146054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002437521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015945391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03789342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009371726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009720412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2004019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387565652","doi":"10.1515/9780887559310-008","title":"Racism, Canadian Jurisprudence, and the De-Peopling of the Métis in <i>Daniels</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Manitoba Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Political science; Law; Gender studies","score_opus":0.02474684503895217,"score_gpt":0.219905095313742,"score_spread":0.19515825027478984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387565652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063808532,0.037870165,0.00029866665,0.058823604,0.001018327,0.000023835491,0.00013550374,0.00003234354,0.89541674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22320491,0.02330063,0.0008587484,0.010268135,0.00062285917,0.000051899064,0.00013308314,0.00012653114,0.7414332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987255,0.00026522568,0.000019707182,0.00010519106,0.00046223856,0.0004221078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991535,0.000302172,0.000039884668,0.000037036923,0.00029918866,0.0001682081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010913159,0.000590135,0.00044055312,0.0023385533,0.025746837,0.008108639,0.0014915158,0.0027403894,0.016688256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022641886,0.00040803925,0.00019921105,0.004666168,0.016022764,0.0026762343,0.0017285831,0.004519621,0.0010568686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006638313,0.000013203324,0.00022862488,0.00004127009,0.0000016506933,0.00006003148,0.018185122,0.00004851456,0.000046584504,0.8284954,0.1417406,0.011132304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030167166,0.0000032953544,0.0014946093,0.00017223375,0.000003225889,0.000057293735,0.010561238,0.00007191736,0.00006554679,0.033343304,0.95421076,0.0000137007155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9594274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06803446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06803446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08300203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4936269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387573389","doi":"10.1017/s0738248023000469","title":"Luke Taylor, <i>Constructing the Family: Marriage and Work in Nineteenth-Century English Law</i> Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2023. Pp. viii, 411. $90 hardcover (ISBN 978-1-4875-4652-6).","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Sociology; Media studies; Economic history; Law and economics; History; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.024759491190100878,"score_gpt":0.24407559132079287,"score_spread":0.219316100130692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387573389","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039720285,0.95424026,0.00018900118,0.03077087,0.0012662229,0.0000093113695,0.0001333443,0.000018724095,0.012974973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015119302,0.92734337,0.00042238156,0.005764197,0.0011239793,0.00003640773,0.000199771,0.0000463908,0.049944185],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930215,0.00031337934,0.000047705023,0.00006044938,0.00019874856,0.00007765371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988066,0.00066984433,0.00011123316,0.000029773484,0.00026229705,0.0001202435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011220766,0.0008148177,0.00043497182,0.0020046397,0.002149256,0.0024271172,0.00093293015,0.001887351,0.013434391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021201507,0.00058005605,0.00019219726,0.0036568763,0.0026130625,0.0053669373,0.00090450834,0.0020117662,0.004232496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032051863,0.0000121430985,0.00030102834,0.0013846644,0.000008601021,0.00012207779,0.0065855156,0.000052084386,0.00011567709,0.018049615,0.9215111,0.05182542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007581135,0.000008684383,0.0026638075,0.0019808987,0.000010672462,0.0001370163,0.0066195615,0.000030632968,0.00013386528,0.0058426512,0.98255193,0.0000127407075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16100709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3316995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16100709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005943612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006643154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32013988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387592524","doi":"10.29305/tj.2023.10.198.46","title":"Unconformity Decision in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Unconformity; Law; Suspension (topology); Political science; Geology; Mathematics; Geochemistry","score_opus":0.04038087896632172,"score_gpt":0.32677653113061617,"score_spread":0.28639565216429447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387592524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04325876,0.0040278793,0.0032633042,0.17662191,0.004145057,0.00048014947,0.002723708,0.00039836817,0.76508075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21441007,0.0015528355,0.0027879346,0.10098894,0.00051531487,0.00021603347,0.00094471645,0.00025771823,0.6783264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97870296,0.0013476639,0.00082272856,0.002973709,0.008322476,0.007830444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98341167,0.0027284871,0.0002536843,0.00089056196,0.010523534,0.0021920444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008688828,0.00089038105,0.0010830609,0.0020609018,0.025449183,0.015048169,0.004725648,0.016071657,0.03356716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022292089,0.0012524471,0.0017536677,0.0030642424,0.007532205,0.004464992,0.006369181,0.013024536,0.0029806262],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014308128,0.000083931416,0.0037347435,0.00019006146,0.00007275549,0.0012912833,0.0031825833,0.0007754932,0.00071001577,0.6860627,0.2815498,0.022203602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012910708,0.00005819601,0.005995901,0.00031334496,0.00011122395,0.00015082536,0.0031354628,0.00136283,0.0010750202,0.021946708,0.9655568,0.00016455699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9864478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9909984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15624633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15624633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34023276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97863466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387626980","doi":"10.1515/9780887555459-006","title":"Love Letter to Section 25 of the Canadian Constitution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Manitoba Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Constitution; Law; Political science; Philosophy; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.042694395898026524,"score_gpt":0.2247145690741206,"score_spread":0.1820201731760941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387626980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023933004,0.0036673446,0.00026135685,0.08300036,0.0054599466,0.00011454896,0.0012400062,0.00012945471,0.9037337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0051997574,0.0005548344,0.00012064832,0.014072877,0.00016967733,0.000022003396,0.00012758494,0.000046424775,0.9796862],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791926,0.00013124906,0.000035027177,0.00015769967,0.0010331782,0.00072366477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979449,0.0003088013,0.000034275145,0.00010989081,0.0012767,0.0003254858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013950665,0.0005846753,0.00058110215,0.0018859826,0.021269577,0.0072700046,0.0017484449,0.0071812114,0.12205327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045288103,0.0008253129,0.00056206423,0.0026716145,0.00287389,0.001866289,0.0016514985,0.007000165,0.020245826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011235259,0.000010736762,0.00019909468,0.000018868583,0.0000025690056,0.00006209421,0.000711599,0.000025162633,0.00007445295,0.042410813,0.951334,0.005139364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036841998,0.0000019194297,0.0005635576,0.000027572827,0.0000020808268,0.000011886541,0.0004823783,0.000016438506,0.00006190258,0.0009629054,0.9978569,0.000008683153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95288837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9833831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12205327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041436613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09111933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40830886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387950447","doi":"10.1080/15265161.2023.2256266","title":"Care to Ease the Slope? Differences in Canadian and Californian Medical Assistance in Dying Laws","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"The American Journal of Bioethics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.07306580805529164,"score_gpt":0.3607721116409649,"score_spread":0.2877063035856733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387950447","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25302893,0.0049503795,0.00018240663,0.67323977,0.0014472019,0.00006756948,0.000984279,0.00002830796,0.06607116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7443057,0.0023461052,0.00029565487,0.23782445,0.000368565,0.00005865199,0.00032327272,0.00004219515,0.014435317],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99150145,0.0009862095,0.00024451892,0.000511546,0.0029677192,0.0037885325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822588,0.0048687463,0.001199803,0.0003279899,0.005346239,0.0059984117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007575212,0.00014719451,0.0004533363,0.0011117201,0.018558012,0.0043605934,0.0027781613,0.0059954654,0.00660767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028657826,0.0003698746,0.0004504665,0.0025360943,0.005585617,0.0018408885,0.0024649515,0.007926403,0.00037029217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033559775,0.00023868709,0.19702116,0.00017084688,0.000109594206,0.001180853,0.11144332,0.0003489207,0.0005371699,0.08226518,0.5403992,0.06594949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120279576,0.00008986926,0.5037461,0.00080746994,0.000097703356,0.0005437409,0.17079951,0.0005402237,0.00044861517,0.0045103766,0.3180296,0.00026654158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99167705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99715686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93430704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.065692976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1383029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47663814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387975054","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3928","title":"No Legal Way Out: R v Ryan, Domestic Abuse, and the Defence of Duress by Nadia Verrelli and Lori Chambers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Irrational number; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Focus (optics); Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.01873483587982785,"score_gpt":0.28664018577461414,"score_spread":0.2679053498947863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387975054","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033593435,0.038949434,0.0011829361,0.7279066,0.0020229104,0.00006632747,0.00005178561,0.000025441866,0.19620115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7353213,0.013967595,0.0008636955,0.21423805,0.0013209016,0.00011303836,0.000025725325,0.000043628035,0.034105968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881039,0.005264261,0.0003693075,0.0011037827,0.0024650185,0.0026937376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880668,0.0070573715,0.00091293326,0.0005687311,0.0017768127,0.0016173321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010359946,0.00044802294,0.0009796601,0.0009315663,0.02137988,0.011616503,0.003001712,0.014516064,0.0014878091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019197669,0.00051494065,0.0005908362,0.00089506665,0.055253625,0.0056967386,0.0057114586,0.025939714,0.00023895394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019698147,0.000022528217,0.0009707542,0.000066158245,0.000013321635,0.0006219822,0.043888416,0.0001546396,0.00013458468,0.856283,0.08989893,0.007926001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007089292,0.000051514595,0.0063107405,0.0019083176,0.000064361506,0.0011511979,0.109956175,0.000519243,0.0005689427,0.2549684,0.6241155,0.00031466899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6019194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68891704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6019194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023823043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047113635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8008499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388010206","doi":"10.1080/1756073x.2023.2270808","title":"Practicing truth, in silence: reflecting on the use of non-disclosure agreements in North American ecclesial contexts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Practical Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster Divinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Commission; Order (exchange); Law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Business; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.20404988002323263,"score_gpt":0.4615829254929442,"score_spread":0.25753304546971156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388010206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84968185,0.004862111,0.002646617,0.07928985,0.00063781877,0.000060854214,0.000043410906,0.00003914338,0.06273827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870029,0.0017040767,0.00060008385,0.005732113,0.00013464391,0.000038823957,0.000016117077,0.000044261036,0.004726953],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96581364,0.026503284,0.0006179637,0.0015082728,0.002462755,0.0030942261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9505058,0.0378133,0.0036304728,0.0015179125,0.0039252504,0.0026073365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029566038,0.00065988436,0.0007917371,0.0025883794,0.04139733,0.0133274235,0.0037551105,0.0066526392,0.0037265506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04381238,0.0009199454,0.0003578192,0.0018956393,0.059792403,0.015474337,0.01377749,0.016194908,0.0004848992],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003009219,0.000005252177,0.00022292478,0.000014465963,8.4801246e-7,0.00011900529,0.9930634,0.0000042159095,0.000081006714,0.005191257,0.00037291867,0.0009217717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.644936e-7,0.000007060745,0.00039569795,0.00009286305,0.0000019566708,0.0000794527,0.9879068,0.000021957405,0.0000845343,0.0008571908,0.010543405,0.000008122451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04525127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09764167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04525127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012001525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011193727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.156362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388120833","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198258223.003.0007","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: A Feminist Perspective","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Law; Fundamental rights; Ex post facto law; Bill of rights; Human rights; Right to property; Art","score_opus":0.020722096438458525,"score_gpt":0.27295370836234395,"score_spread":0.25223161192388543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388120833","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034941349,0.02219236,0.0013790106,0.06463158,0.00065119914,0.000029941566,0.0003713504,0.00002620756,0.90722424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4850541,0.04653287,0.0048311967,0.014717156,0.0010271218,0.0001270046,0.0004643031,0.00015946089,0.4470869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975036,0.00050918193,0.00002786553,0.00020734099,0.0010476415,0.00070452614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987834,0.0004440351,0.000049588136,0.000048685302,0.0004755268,0.00019880821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024595966,0.0006984969,0.00039414066,0.0037728532,0.016371427,0.009439651,0.0017348826,0.002980752,0.012583041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020896927,0.00039436072,0.00025264325,0.0059810076,0.029041087,0.0036672873,0.0016402612,0.0041388907,0.0007882377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002408541,0.0000025022398,0.000070239425,0.00001882644,6.5885234e-7,0.00003382392,0.0032862355,0.00009164784,0.000030242949,0.951181,0.039368823,0.0059135407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004011645,0.0000025973056,0.0011905074,0.00022738628,0.0000029929067,0.000036284717,0.0065299505,0.00018149572,0.00007012087,0.06851566,0.92322075,0.000018213164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9785014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9881649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8685485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13145152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09355605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.953752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388137342","doi":"10.1515/9781552389911-018","title":"Puisne Justices of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.03051044012139186,"score_gpt":0.22328342614842195,"score_spread":0.19277298602703008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388137342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016167335,0.015458688,0.00041621295,0.05917899,0.0022820514,0.00007028703,0.0003783716,0.0000460285,0.9060021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20411687,0.0046775276,0.00031494955,0.015992582,0.00038198056,0.000044338256,0.000106915795,0.0000889783,0.7742759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959489,0.0003177582,0.00006276771,0.00039763591,0.0012957322,0.0019770297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782515,0.00043190576,0.00005052546,0.00008458623,0.0010844036,0.0005234385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015864439,0.00059468596,0.0007684427,0.0018793894,0.046538007,0.014005628,0.00183048,0.007987148,0.02348255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070343544,0.00084805937,0.0004713161,0.0023845274,0.0073016235,0.0030380604,0.0033219368,0.012165069,0.0016621454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038136364,0.000027340166,0.00081075454,0.000043510627,0.000018275949,0.00037094537,0.0075727724,0.00028123736,0.00011289264,0.53665423,0.43531862,0.018751325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012121402,0.00000706725,0.0026461554,0.00022830917,0.00002094039,0.000063749234,0.007578901,0.00020647192,0.00018123495,0.027188173,0.96181875,0.000048103564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9789346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092097506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.092097506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1366939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6682173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388149978","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199284740.003.0013","title":"Canada: The Rights and Their Application","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Explication; Legislation; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.016082226778484688,"score_gpt":0.2367226035432724,"score_spread":0.2206403767647877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388149978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011349684,0.004742664,0.0008041595,0.0066218325,0.00026562027,0.000022823477,0.00013339116,0.000020301439,0.9862542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20868918,0.018900733,0.0032877252,0.0051441235,0.00035253243,0.00008679718,0.00024767802,0.000114378185,0.76317686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745625,0.00028422385,0.00006186462,0.00025906655,0.0014378065,0.00050086004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895966,0.00019915261,0.000025438663,0.00009044198,0.0006091141,0.00011612294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011154684,0.00047697785,0.00036636755,0.0019871546,0.009335993,0.0079429485,0.0013077105,0.0023188177,0.02497503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027190968,0.00035814938,0.00024596349,0.0035690304,0.01518619,0.0030065002,0.0023118586,0.0036745477,0.0018751642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015816112,0.0000026211396,0.000049915958,0.000019951982,7.0151185e-7,0.000036319932,0.0013260747,0.00006450321,0.000022372004,0.9629192,0.026507948,0.009048829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034030688,0.0000021239844,0.00050301966,0.00020214713,0.000003288179,0.000046364145,0.0010657572,0.00014927273,0.00007226264,0.084972695,0.91296834,0.000011425697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95883393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96910614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07537241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07537241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08689836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5468677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388628832","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4599638","title":"First Nations People, Law and Injustice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.014800751628111179,"score_gpt":0.29877414866356405,"score_spread":0.2839733970354529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388628832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83802336,0.011009642,0.00019463821,0.026923582,0.00024851153,0.000020729398,0.00016566091,0.00000602069,0.12340779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941916,0.0018965665,0.0000302234,0.00094590284,0.000054025262,0.00001352222,0.000024545336,0.0000023966168,0.0028412384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983407,0.00089510815,0.00006423985,0.00009126807,0.00022354464,0.0003850965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99103737,0.0048583895,0.0017489977,0.00023430918,0.00044768874,0.0016733006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026400692,0.00023345905,0.000341022,0.002329373,0.0057552624,0.005724338,0.0005384504,0.0031751222,0.013124755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009765858,0.00014886785,0.00015830122,0.0030092502,0.009083535,0.0040892716,0.0029504239,0.0030238791,0.00035282725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012883105,0.001323619,0.34490383,0.00031081846,0.00008470593,0.001753763,0.21824269,0.0003055892,0.00015486796,0.3851851,0.013549231,0.03405691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036758996,0.00017862079,0.33028853,0.0009819882,0.000073023926,0.0014122381,0.5546438,0.00030802388,0.00013946534,0.0726573,0.039223637,0.00005649965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03321844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054643314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96678156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021274884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035300108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06605017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389131209","doi":"10.1525/ncl.2023.78.3.254","title":"Contributors to this Issue","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nineteenth-Century Literature","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Romanticism; Citation; Download; Romance; Art; History; Art history; Literature; Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.01453809609386218,"score_gpt":0.3065024887800517,"score_spread":0.2919643926861895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389131209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032627335,0.0127953105,0.0005671903,0.04738883,0.24435061,0.00017736618,0.0014415692,0.0006846608,0.6922682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001200267,0.0037790975,0.00019097172,0.007257708,0.026964305,0.0000636625,0.0007480052,0.0003003198,0.9594956],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782455,0.000274037,0.00012389355,0.0003509248,0.0011452093,0.00028128093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99427754,0.00065033505,0.00023949712,0.00058438093,0.0026813953,0.0015668164],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001703968,0.0010251342,0.00094929663,0.0023708572,0.0035154065,0.010194355,0.00241194,0.004057813,0.63998103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012119553,0.00045152986,0.0007042241,0.0026319055,0.0010052028,0.0063585583,0.0056608613,0.0039378097,0.5425899],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035341577,0.000006105755,0.000026451236,0.000047133923,8.8012337e-7,0.000012268643,0.000036067526,0.0000051289558,0.000025265761,0.0014044235,0.9810065,0.017426271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012247584,0.0000019830597,0.000050699102,0.000048118047,5.433817e-7,0.00001126151,0.000052724507,0.0000042939573,0.000008557906,0.0003497579,0.99946934,0.0000013131047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00189616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035720293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63998103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017498495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004213981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51352334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389332904","doi":"10.7202/1105996ar","title":"THE CODIFICATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN CANADA","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Fundamental rights; Law; Political science; Ex post facto law; International human rights law; Charter; Supreme court; Constitution; Bill of rights; Democracy; Linguistic rights; Right to property; Politics","score_opus":0.01577924187619739,"score_gpt":0.23069462955659945,"score_spread":0.21491538768040205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389332904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12794262,0.007085636,0.004068465,0.045302033,0.00070388,0.00026147926,0.0020230839,0.0001529158,0.8124598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77488124,0.0044172877,0.005497576,0.005704735,0.00010145106,0.00012753291,0.0009269047,0.00010455595,0.2082388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928619,0.0005223466,0.00028857202,0.00070100167,0.0034508612,0.0021753423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929939,0.0011585095,0.0002789119,0.00065803196,0.004075059,0.00083562854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030767398,0.00037257126,0.0004417704,0.002815993,0.014955905,0.011268523,0.0020632874,0.002328129,0.009607942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010755234,0.00045839304,0.00042908636,0.007396968,0.0075425142,0.0032154066,0.00499708,0.003208912,0.00048670612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005011362,0.000024317445,0.006044214,0.00014631699,0.00002688038,0.00036748007,0.01687742,0.0013998965,0.00043927075,0.86465305,0.046378806,0.063592225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034404613,0.000020693495,0.021202687,0.0005275332,0.00005157268,0.00013048355,0.014692559,0.0019122318,0.0010025041,0.04434955,0.9159162,0.00015956927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9958331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21112323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21112323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.309227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91498524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389355438","doi":"10.7202/1105800ar","title":"SUBSIDIARITY, REPUBLICANISM, AND THE DIVISION OF POWERS IN CANADA","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Jurisprudence; Federalism; Normative; Political science; Law; Federalist; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Economic Justice; Sociology; European union; Economics","score_opus":0.015143951439335984,"score_gpt":0.21758965818865847,"score_spread":0.2024457067493225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389355438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33284506,0.007018505,0.0015712043,0.042512864,0.00021913479,0.00009066152,0.00043383517,0.00004472398,0.61526406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93001944,0.0020035047,0.0004431423,0.0019047718,0.000025807089,0.000019598521,0.00006420061,0.000014281716,0.06550518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986737,0.000110634406,0.000024075514,0.00010761103,0.00029675712,0.00078728143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989405,0.00023614055,0.00008841296,0.000033286724,0.00031887897,0.00038276572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054581015,0.00015889842,0.00026551847,0.0009884425,0.014256729,0.005205376,0.0009309793,0.0017343978,0.010258474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025912777,0.00018689943,0.00026002797,0.0022425682,0.0065369518,0.0012330895,0.002253871,0.001914621,0.00026724703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033215554,0.000024640101,0.007778634,0.000060828123,0.000013803336,0.00030901263,0.007464693,0.0009505142,0.00015524252,0.9570649,0.014202562,0.011941971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013724701,0.00004508819,0.100070834,0.0005100332,0.00011643083,0.00027357475,0.05154983,0.0072191306,0.00081699813,0.24316199,0.5959423,0.00015649367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99254143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99719054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8880013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11199868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12716433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8126111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389355453","doi":"10.7202/1105717ar","title":"LA CÉLÉBRATION DU MARIAGE DOIT RESPECTER LES PRESCRIPTIONS DU CODE CIVIL DU QUÉBEC, QU’ELLE REVÊTE OU NON UN CARACTÈRE RELIGIEUX","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.01124196857489311,"score_gpt":0.21203017792118087,"score_spread":0.20078820934628777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389355453","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33273613,0.0032786753,0.0029234374,0.06995717,0.0010698682,0.0001421879,0.0008799669,0.000086102766,0.58892643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7587648,0.0008214682,0.00093084003,0.006376175,0.000088239445,0.00006468024,0.00015842241,0.000045988847,0.23274931],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985102,0.00031730373,0.000036884285,0.00014914706,0.0004660261,0.0005204944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975573,0.00038780508,0.00020203931,0.00019094635,0.0011665033,0.00049541035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016346283,0.00026936305,0.00027876036,0.0006228856,0.012674237,0.005033567,0.0008573936,0.0015509961,0.020137124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045007695,0.00022711483,0.0002256232,0.00081836275,0.0060806996,0.001544983,0.00199924,0.0033799342,0.0014119503],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016213406,0.00006865483,0.045968115,0.0004146677,0.000068785375,0.0007653593,0.19809459,0.00041957851,0.002929798,0.50745827,0.16052175,0.083128266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000133874155,0.000040791307,0.08698484,0.000352645,0.000028118327,0.00011111664,0.07260095,0.00024071427,0.0006950899,0.005191873,0.83367187,0.00006853209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90904087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9762161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90904087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027314078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03802935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19817847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389676879","doi":"10.1515/9780889778276-017","title":"10. Canada’s Court System: A Hostile Place for Indigenous Peoples","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Regina Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Law; Genealogy; History; Biology","score_opus":0.025845479849715188,"score_gpt":0.22076609341334277,"score_spread":0.19492061356362758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389676879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012407831,0.0045953463,0.00032246028,0.019184457,0.0005734503,0.000039653172,0.00024375283,0.00005219798,0.9625809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.114672855,0.0014912601,0.0003791171,0.0056500165,0.00007448387,0.000029320216,0.00007001657,0.00006438773,0.8775685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990484,0.00008231579,0.000011744275,0.00006620393,0.0002566161,0.00053466635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996031,0.000068928566,0.000014633896,0.000016948052,0.00016624315,0.00013016158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047723754,0.00030531632,0.00019938168,0.0009279117,0.021593995,0.0082216915,0.0011187007,0.0040329816,0.03159971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008587366,0.00030514522,0.0002518477,0.0015233787,0.0053523285,0.0018460847,0.0015440747,0.0040507084,0.0024175835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012023044,0.000020685884,0.0007322782,0.00004932175,0.0000035633245,0.00035940474,0.02005508,0.00009660092,0.00021119067,0.67969453,0.27110323,0.027662082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042759075,0.000004828733,0.0024571947,0.00007931366,0.0000035936769,0.00009309939,0.007476193,0.000053508444,0.00010507432,0.0046973466,0.98501146,0.000014072685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9810869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99598086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039343044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039343044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07232785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2854551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390580097","doi":"10.61959/t210318b","title":"Rapport : Les droits des conjoints de fait au Canada","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.14991334389447541,"score_gpt":0.344883094046323,"score_spread":0.1949697501518476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390580097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30749464,0.008489917,0.0070390766,0.021590669,0.0009437651,0.00016038933,0.0035017505,0.00018261536,0.6505971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6077361,0.0024576613,0.0020266476,0.0017803069,0.0000632154,0.000046508918,0.0005560717,0.00006097737,0.3852724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962419,0.0003296569,0.000087689084,0.00038367193,0.0018516174,0.0011055195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977921,0.00026845234,0.00017953198,0.000103884144,0.0010833703,0.0005726562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013505155,0.00027859668,0.00034189507,0.001541264,0.014617914,0.0055094543,0.00101441,0.0013402649,0.02621979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034322808,0.00029714176,0.0003242386,0.0023894429,0.0037695677,0.0014287682,0.0026258207,0.0019168695,0.0017837511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024557643,0.0000627903,0.073827244,0.00034956116,0.00007558594,0.0018199626,0.08750807,0.0012209484,0.0019686627,0.52836484,0.1531781,0.15137862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011655604,0.00003869128,0.05508462,0.00042282153,0.000041919317,0.0007193376,0.04778779,0.00035755223,0.0008374582,0.00563034,0.88897544,0.00009241042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96586746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98613536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034485463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034485463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06424577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2502107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390592588","doi":"10.61959/t210318a","title":"Report: The Rights of Common-Law Partners in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Safeguarding; Jurisdiction; Common law; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Law; Statutory law; Political science; Family law; Medicine","score_opus":0.12274719316513748,"score_gpt":0.4050144762153211,"score_spread":0.2822672830501836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390592588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43906772,0.010511544,0.001093217,0.024243452,0.00044388903,0.00069163996,0.017869214,0.00012857547,0.50595075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78808576,0.007088872,0.0013399461,0.0020744815,0.000051482122,0.00013404446,0.0041891253,0.000036702655,0.19699958],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971181,0.00012346533,0.00006788453,0.0001488836,0.0015959182,0.0009457441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961539,0.00031896896,0.00020594065,0.00011296085,0.0021318772,0.0010763094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013142508,0.00020909711,0.00020615911,0.0019203512,0.010698208,0.0030284037,0.0010572296,0.0010009778,0.011128114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032350742,0.0002351959,0.00016695751,0.0031158791,0.0015262862,0.0009994755,0.0019802002,0.0010507606,0.0005248842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001104055,0.00027773532,0.18351945,0.00045718948,0.000032001182,0.0016168302,0.06262991,0.00075389695,0.0011270869,0.14093383,0.40316144,0.20538022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026968482,0.000039711675,0.20587428,0.0003743791,0.00002848817,0.00060751877,0.06410867,0.0007079354,0.0013130911,0.0035250823,0.7232997,0.00009407801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99607027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042203236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042203236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16536948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3062073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390627893","doi":"10.1515/9781894725170-009","title":"Appendix C: A Charge Delivered to the Clergy of the Diocese of Newfoundland","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charge (physics); History; Genealogy; Physics; Particle physics","score_opus":0.05585132680035048,"score_gpt":0.30269205808877875,"score_spread":0.24684073128842826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390627893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002694182,0.0018040774,0.0009641882,0.0067636003,0.0033252675,0.00041470578,0.007860624,0.0007352139,0.975438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022569378,0.00024923615,0.00024082957,0.00049270794,0.000110869056,0.000029269793,0.00060224795,0.00009900777,0.9959189],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961036,0.00003940982,0.00001510954,0.000043441854,0.00017827643,0.00011339366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879396,0.0003692872,0.00003459015,0.000065742875,0.0005168903,0.00021946248],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042306405,0.0005743412,0.0005181513,0.0017761261,0.0034925435,0.001733905,0.00088945945,0.002142078,0.62613106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024107127,0.00033285838,0.00025102662,0.0016750938,0.00060063857,0.0013917801,0.0015540754,0.0011202631,0.16939564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009136243,0.0000099412355,0.000091012786,0.000031154377,4.9411307e-7,0.000060185215,0.00010421859,0.000025453155,0.00009866333,0.0015419881,0.9850155,0.013012264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004467231,0.000006749661,0.0013559831,0.000046884295,8.7934717e-7,0.00008777042,0.00025705583,0.000033213273,0.00006802603,0.00030427577,0.997829,0.0000056069794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17608067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.414238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8239193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006060971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050737723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53327864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390718725","doi":"10.1017/9781805431848.051","title":"Prolocutors of the York convocation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Art","score_opus":0.032230770010231446,"score_gpt":0.32003801905961143,"score_spread":0.28780724904938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390718725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037402622,0.0101692835,0.00066333526,0.02739163,0.015681557,0.00012586216,0.00080108375,0.00015693824,0.94127005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01571456,0.0014379587,0.00012511318,0.0032507337,0.0010552898,0.000064307,0.00022649822,0.00008407492,0.97804147],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786323,0.00023890918,0.0001131794,0.0004379369,0.0006991041,0.0006477395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801564,0.00046093733,0.00012211369,0.00022248982,0.00079690194,0.0003819991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015460345,0.00075902476,0.000411949,0.0013572068,0.009955985,0.007411888,0.001116597,0.0034966036,0.11262097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075269635,0.00064886716,0.00032869895,0.0012059577,0.003478682,0.0030970369,0.003644326,0.0072248173,0.03525175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027199358,0.000011331192,0.0002517129,0.000044185104,0.0000018270043,0.00016691623,0.0015935045,0.000018935682,0.00012804882,0.105748,0.8764268,0.015581632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031740644,0.0000028997645,0.00027800197,0.00004210966,8.633767e-7,0.000025775142,0.00044258824,0.000009442781,0.000051550996,0.0008721498,0.9982679,0.0000035684586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09744526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13759193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11262097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007828872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009583148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3767547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390734435","doi":"10.1017/9781805431831.003","title":"The convocation of 1775-80","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bishops; Ancient history; History; Theology; Geography; Art; Demography; Archaeology; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03298559154756186,"score_gpt":0.3472254395655972,"score_spread":0.31423984801803534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390734435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008100583,0.0029105516,0.00025704846,0.01297818,0.00887906,0.0000914987,0.0007369505,0.0000766853,0.96596944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023288513,0.00047433955,0.00006905263,0.004847884,0.00047234164,0.000042124728,0.00023887304,0.000064195614,0.97050256],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970797,0.000213348,0.00006674925,0.0002668626,0.0009373133,0.0014359198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990495,0.00005558871,0.000050529983,0.0000623032,0.0004644881,0.0003176986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013866475,0.0008582138,0.00049685437,0.0012714439,0.016344069,0.0053086057,0.0015545135,0.0030534386,0.11636927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040573445,0.00041477176,0.00048183458,0.0011413351,0.0051705386,0.0017283116,0.0056168,0.006667709,0.036305543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005633099,0.000015699432,0.00057092565,0.00007301224,0.0000043818663,0.00066911767,0.0054758033,0.000019619854,0.00023404101,0.07011581,0.9071854,0.015579821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002762443,0.000005928455,0.001158035,0.00006194091,0.000001233402,0.00006060915,0.0015658049,0.000004288078,0.00008571184,0.00050438766,0.9965429,0.0000064329697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4821145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6641882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4821145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016716393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016641887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95861655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390775872","doi":"10.61959/m230605x","title":"Facts and Stats: Married and Common-Law Couples in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Geography; Psychology; Genealogy; Political science; History","score_opus":0.11760385966327093,"score_gpt":0.36969971827871306,"score_spread":0.25209585861544215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390775872","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1368346,0.010102564,0.00071496586,0.018353507,0.0012769661,0.0012130784,0.5876067,0.00052983663,0.24336775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49932784,0.026717018,0.0023670893,0.007265966,0.0004727759,0.0008025961,0.26432994,0.00020243999,0.19851425],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969193,0.00006030449,0.00016198578,0.00013957362,0.002091609,0.0006272717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99158597,0.0004911457,0.00061728794,0.00016276474,0.00531257,0.0018303124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001172651,0.00035263607,0.00028859242,0.0061374605,0.00693829,0.0024351568,0.0020421601,0.0009419404,0.01685147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00519421,0.0005436145,0.00039186561,0.013131236,0.0010117862,0.0008206759,0.0013345039,0.001464527,0.0023416334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006786197,0.00011210934,0.18372762,0.00042566578,0.000027609472,0.0005577052,0.003540974,0.00050179014,0.00013837557,0.007837608,0.7325282,0.070534505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024799074,0.000021226158,0.61298287,0.00047560758,0.000018828627,0.00019254404,0.0043806755,0.000603737,0.00018983662,0.00058848277,0.38046706,0.000054328448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9980501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99875975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043047603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043047603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13842197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3123337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390786861","doi":"10.61959/m230605y","title":"Faits et chiffres : Les couples mariés et en union libre au Canada","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08846212718270918,"score_gpt":0.35422293642183145,"score_spread":0.26576080923912226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390786861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88941854,0.02110723,0.0005154556,0.01897017,0.0002934945,0.00017223122,0.009375868,0.00007188086,0.060075138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89000094,0.015189514,0.00052924105,0.0014995149,0.00008184751,0.0000807777,0.0016493343,0.00003739555,0.09093145],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984763,0.00021285511,0.00004129349,0.000104207196,0.00047396641,0.0006913008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817824,0.00028885607,0.00022086197,0.000034117213,0.0006338495,0.0006441297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011080054,0.00041777772,0.00028335094,0.0021357904,0.011850837,0.0025824292,0.0008746218,0.0012360286,0.0102473255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031405825,0.00049595203,0.00025975713,0.005064542,0.001818382,0.001002876,0.0017170527,0.0016273197,0.00067475846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004900131,0.00026864515,0.6031046,0.00053082587,0.00006815727,0.0027521674,0.1262816,0.00045840675,0.0018534075,0.019249266,0.101708,0.14323492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025894999,0.000115202034,0.6683605,0.00047235173,0.000036699064,0.0007875063,0.17755415,0.00026003848,0.0010516479,0.0006738282,0.15057983,0.0000824547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99443567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99762374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030764414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030764414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05337722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22321248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391141301","doi":"10.12987/yale/9780300253238.001.0001","title":"An Empire of Laws","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Yale University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.05469699548364494,"score_gpt":0.2868837920637363,"score_spread":0.2321867965800914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391141301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010443285,0.0036028733,0.0025958961,0.013302515,0.00032732674,0.000023521492,0.000057124234,0.000047404872,0.9696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7011967,0.0037552004,0.0023255765,0.0064523215,0.0003085406,0.00012290385,0.00012077555,0.00016032129,0.2855577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970483,0.00093567005,0.0001096573,0.0005645781,0.000762681,0.00057898456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778676,0.00081681466,0.0001692769,0.00045851496,0.00046591277,0.00030275312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023033482,0.0003449533,0.000455427,0.0015966106,0.010228273,0.010491389,0.00073462364,0.0025978533,0.012160263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053175846,0.00050898694,0.00030968618,0.0013392472,0.034113497,0.0076433597,0.004511675,0.005871166,0.0017963774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026681748,0.0000039652014,0.00015347399,0.000008419097,0.0000013917972,0.000032157284,0.001981304,0.000039732095,0.000024195406,0.9914349,0.004008938,0.0023087133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011444497,0.000013613741,0.001299497,0.00017019846,0.0000050811677,0.00006931849,0.002098252,0.00027568353,0.00008671351,0.27908954,0.716869,0.000011712422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051226445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06663673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051226445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0121546555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011077921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10185653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391209358","doi":"10.5040/9798400664496.0026","title":"Newfoundland","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.030776497212284388,"score_gpt":0.3200103280067757,"score_spread":0.28923383079449133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391209358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000666252,0.0011814167,0.00019732743,0.0006374869,0.00018056517,0.000018410477,0.0036103958,0.00023416815,0.99327385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00072867254,0.00037709018,0.000101714046,0.00008421879,0.000010260476,0.000007028778,0.0006645955,0.00009278461,0.9979336],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999521,0.000038096587,0.000020623898,0.00011644665,0.00016097046,0.00014284306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987417,0.00018059708,0.00007905428,0.0002385701,0.00047668288,0.0002834041],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052321184,0.001125132,0.00062791747,0.0024950777,0.0029600707,0.004915856,0.0010194936,0.0015257761,0.77990234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016615045,0.0006576599,0.00041893663,0.00450419,0.000709138,0.0025255387,0.0022350866,0.0015441123,0.53800935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004092833,0.000052946813,0.0008164406,0.0001259093,0.000005184047,0.00014828244,0.00015571318,0.00012867703,0.00024760343,0.00839716,0.81616324,0.17371799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004333846,0.0000045079096,0.0018267207,0.00008680332,0.0000029253908,0.000050452527,0.00012667214,0.000049582115,0.000091910624,0.00051621225,0.9972345,0.0000053475956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19824712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47066492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80175287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039481083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004415973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39418644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391412895","doi":"10.3138/9781487535018-012","title":"11 Reasonable Accommodation, Diversity, and the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Diversity (politics); Accommodation; Law; Reasonable accommodation; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.026908603713492713,"score_gpt":0.21786563289176605,"score_spread":0.19095702917827334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391412895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010480203,0.01650254,0.0007547678,0.043202687,0.00044922056,0.00003739314,0.00034573852,0.000027169293,0.92820024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5721394,0.0076288506,0.00088424847,0.013440037,0.00041525747,0.00007841149,0.00019383946,0.00007061508,0.40514943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965103,0.0005413379,0.00007395144,0.0003370832,0.0008726575,0.0016645537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758863,0.0008338336,0.00009631814,0.00014424193,0.0009008375,0.00043609724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00204771,0.0005211125,0.0007107056,0.0014337075,0.027995108,0.013451819,0.001984704,0.0085669,0.018389428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007462169,0.0005798023,0.00040328677,0.0031394796,0.013597683,0.0031460957,0.0026932599,0.009043463,0.0010104587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007639682,0.0000054424027,0.00020333615,0.000016850063,0.0000027482113,0.00006174634,0.0016327864,0.0001528356,0.000017552182,0.95860887,0.03630472,0.0029855033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033278742,0.000009575871,0.0029701255,0.00042925106,0.00003051206,0.00008883273,0.006225455,0.00079695723,0.00012352118,0.34166673,0.6475564,0.000069347014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97807944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99027795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084051915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.084051915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12264761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6098422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391600492","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1435","title":"Where Can an Aboriginal Rights Holder Exercise Their Rights? Reflections From R. v. Desautel","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Supreme court; Constitution; Law; Political science; Human rights; Bill of rights; Fundamental rights; Indigenous rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.07186610764409139,"score_gpt":0.37879059672575316,"score_spread":0.30692448908166176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391600492","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0258805,0.03850557,0.0005536205,0.8349594,0.0009870186,0.000014552402,0.00003732445,0.000007279203,0.09905479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6162468,0.05335193,0.0014182861,0.29737863,0.002132108,0.000060293773,0.000042700696,0.000044904147,0.029324364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904446,0.0049695284,0.00031502865,0.0010358477,0.001342069,0.0018929879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98838323,0.008936679,0.00039538942,0.00022924558,0.001243779,0.00081171043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016771574,0.0003247156,0.00071176974,0.00109581,0.015005849,0.011090925,0.003370921,0.014812766,0.0026529308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013528292,0.00048596555,0.0006828627,0.0011122677,0.039971408,0.013816257,0.0042764475,0.022110619,0.00048230833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019790943,0.000034730343,0.001063927,0.00016226505,0.000013058927,0.0011965993,0.09770696,0.00012066498,0.00023307992,0.8293675,0.05567569,0.014405711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028867355,0.00005090386,0.0037624843,0.0017064551,0.00004082193,0.0007493191,0.20874643,0.00016049852,0.000509184,0.20943801,0.57470846,0.00009861704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3863745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.496986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6136255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014952421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01880437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7682511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391689428","doi":"10.51644/9781554581368","title":"Uneasy Partners","year":2007,"lang":"de","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.06211244625565758,"score_gpt":0.366917758286935,"score_spread":0.3048053120312774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391689428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038067966,0.004220877,0.004813532,0.11351337,0.006584942,0.00009650425,0.00028645067,0.00038453698,0.8662929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032307763,0.0012966868,0.0012925514,0.01934873,0.00035071984,0.000046228994,0.00014812054,0.00023801878,0.94497126],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931445,0.0013039364,0.00012183157,0.00083127833,0.0029533922,0.0016450179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914567,0.00079295906,0.00024359388,0.0006840612,0.0035866029,0.0032360444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050683925,0.0007323819,0.0005668857,0.0010954562,0.018544516,0.01624951,0.0024514159,0.0041605565,0.10028669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01378449,0.00042613538,0.00032805683,0.0016526058,0.008379518,0.00672484,0.010226835,0.0068079187,0.026186718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024606235,0.000021756592,0.00052459975,0.000053374646,0.0000048817114,0.0003128559,0.010535301,0.000059686306,0.0002649333,0.45305088,0.49162596,0.04352103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017076957,0.0000021594685,0.000073839605,0.00003361742,0.0000013793895,0.00007487619,0.0024181698,0.000024375926,0.000038240647,0.0065463823,0.990781,0.0000042229894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24819694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4280877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24819694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022711914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034260422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49350458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391705845","doi":"10.51644/9781554584079-006","title":"The Anglican Church in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Genealogy; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03421549571426797,"score_gpt":0.27470940735935706,"score_spread":0.2404939116450891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391705845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1632268,0.03426551,0.00063463725,0.039438743,0.0013668102,0.00007409256,0.00023457741,0.000052374304,0.7607065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65022886,0.01003284,0.0005667767,0.0045799073,0.00010944586,0.000027082931,0.000064263186,0.00007958051,0.33431122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988801,0.00020972404,0.0000150192,0.000073356125,0.00020052813,0.00062131474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913603,0.00014313542,0.0000330482,0.000021472166,0.00026243963,0.0004040639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007344028,0.00029166718,0.0004125135,0.0010572537,0.048796255,0.007208969,0.0015464961,0.0021396514,0.013037751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015751926,0.00039679545,0.00018500122,0.0026650538,0.008014635,0.0015524478,0.0021857666,0.004582987,0.000654488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041433883,0.000058941336,0.0038967454,0.00013844487,0.000011381558,0.0010515235,0.17905724,0.00023668203,0.00025211592,0.6126243,0.13466358,0.06796771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008477198,0.00001160091,0.007909637,0.00036736266,0.000011128391,0.00020630933,0.12755747,0.00015601423,0.00015957467,0.0070575317,0.8565213,0.000033569628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09175972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09175972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15154828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6657665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391759235","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-46367-9_3","title":"The Last Sceptic: Santayana, Descartes, and the External World","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave companions.","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03150320198748493,"score_gpt":0.2884136240097274,"score_spread":0.2569104220222425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391759235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035264737,0.08402222,0.0012800795,0.041024245,0.0018017375,0.000011322504,0.00014984775,0.000047863807,0.86813617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35399422,0.06840024,0.0021119278,0.010167903,0.0030977,0.00009445968,0.0002487904,0.0003477258,0.5615371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995338,0.00023772553,0.000013871029,0.00006223807,0.00009753816,0.00005486423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999418,0.00028030758,0.000036172012,0.00007514905,0.00013628359,0.00005407335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061918056,0.00056536106,0.00035647515,0.0014202989,0.005718514,0.0064178477,0.0007701992,0.0017063543,0.012981417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024824562,0.0003094843,0.00025788517,0.002094211,0.012455154,0.0039038681,0.0017593874,0.0030305984,0.0029790832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000846154,0.000006292858,0.00018662121,0.000039112896,0.0000028365755,0.00008191345,0.004569585,0.00004078116,0.000025195735,0.88610303,0.09770968,0.011226452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003393991,0.000002450903,0.00024095755,0.0001981662,0.0000033894755,0.000088042965,0.0031229828,0.000038680777,0.000083596395,0.17631373,0.8198991,0.0000055242276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036016807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0741719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036016807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003997511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003654681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071614385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391858365","doi":"10.2307/jj.11955033.7","title":"Revitalizing Canada’s Indigenous Constitution:","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Indigenous; Political science; Geography; Law; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.034361778760149876,"score_gpt":0.24232353270097887,"score_spread":0.207961753940829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391858365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03119013,0.008545778,0.0010266225,0.086341836,0.0017726186,0.0000869863,0.00023062609,0.000071613664,0.87073386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30392244,0.003157339,0.0013092817,0.04326551,0.00027908906,0.00008760413,0.00008350185,0.00012968887,0.6477655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941514,0.0005838049,0.00007644669,0.0003389294,0.0019132346,0.0029361127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977283,0.00047945787,0.000054799817,0.00014418662,0.0010486224,0.00054461666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036794648,0.00054295704,0.0004945782,0.0017374768,0.032608114,0.013150373,0.0026714546,0.008512804,0.014305604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006654287,0.00051952916,0.0005210534,0.0023587572,0.018835006,0.0037109954,0.005361348,0.0120459795,0.0009150495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001740385,0.000023395689,0.0006148116,0.00004775425,0.0000112549815,0.00021881689,0.017386824,0.00021494013,0.00013791228,0.8612547,0.10396593,0.016106224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019169158,0.000009153378,0.0022214456,0.00020829141,0.000018817766,0.000075831915,0.0129628675,0.00016108074,0.00026995427,0.03433163,0.9496726,0.000049178223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99127275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99621284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1091788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1091788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27893883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79215133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391869491","doi":"10.51644/9780889205666-014","title":"Publications Of The Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; History","score_opus":0.05176179639387857,"score_gpt":0.2713781951555861,"score_spread":0.21961639876170752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391869491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00087212026,0.022354279,0.00049654825,0.011153195,0.0037265792,0.00005641832,0.0031163606,0.00022448112,0.958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004225236,0.0071450407,0.000447751,0.00043946272,0.00019449703,0.000016018561,0.00067814667,0.00010620737,0.9867476],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981933,0.000092963244,0.000044725053,0.00013208899,0.0012382411,0.00029861197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967229,0.0002579165,0.00008086422,0.00020839482,0.002251368,0.00047858479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014409039,0.0009545984,0.00064811995,0.008168602,0.009477013,0.009404679,0.001313169,0.0017894496,0.1856772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039605354,0.00051787455,0.00035852703,0.011326049,0.0026346943,0.0029715127,0.0017118076,0.0023935908,0.0232941],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005226017,0.0000047712883,0.00013275295,0.00006191427,0.0000014871254,0.000023111435,0.00047612094,0.000031462052,0.00002984898,0.048300188,0.91230905,0.038624037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.007733e-7,4.3980344e-7,0.00029836444,0.000047162117,9.982439e-7,0.000010882692,0.0001667911,0.00001271566,0.000015461628,0.001242083,0.9982014,0.000003128228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90682644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97116727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96027106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03972895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.077540435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6211521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392031113","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197744512.003.0003","title":"British Columbia Lodge No. 1","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Archaeology; History; Geography","score_opus":0.027365693885871935,"score_gpt":0.2773402617147935,"score_spread":0.24997456782892155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392031113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011438762,0.0023013984,0.00009531806,0.00067770906,0.00038387912,0.000024085039,0.0014922643,0.000105660736,0.99377584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019182691,0.0006163053,0.00005186286,0.000084709056,0.000014418478,0.0000074587097,0.00038483427,0.000036256,0.99688584],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998248,0.0000088995,0.000005155643,0.000035271187,0.000084257044,0.00004166764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99979335,0.000016807177,0.000005688872,0.000015942942,0.00012235138,0.000045836463],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010872913,0.0005579213,0.00039943296,0.0016116503,0.0047540287,0.004025016,0.0007008798,0.0010410814,0.5467719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033467816,0.0003284546,0.00018657607,0.0028621124,0.0005801943,0.0010154118,0.0010570488,0.0013451043,0.16308789],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027841947,0.000031462256,0.00033758825,0.0001561946,0.0000023875048,0.00024580592,0.00036117146,0.00010074703,0.00048130204,0.022875458,0.8775581,0.09782193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010960404,0.0000023457083,0.00035049103,0.000053565705,6.27739e-7,0.000020632266,0.00010811204,0.00001307231,0.000065952256,0.00032135716,0.9990601,0.0000025988804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48300597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80485505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5467719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008480331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005927637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96038914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392054503","doi":"10.51644/9780889208407-005","title":"The Church of England in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Art; Archaeology","score_opus":0.021161782710652183,"score_gpt":0.2537172548009315,"score_spread":0.2325554720902793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392054503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.121702656,0.04574812,0.0005516742,0.06466464,0.0021381779,0.00011001448,0.00047234425,0.00006429377,0.76454794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5262073,0.008497226,0.0005659328,0.0056908233,0.000116236035,0.000040763516,0.0000987596,0.000086279746,0.45869675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822575,0.00029404295,0.000030552852,0.00014274858,0.00031644254,0.0009904247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983797,0.00028612468,0.000063745465,0.000050337872,0.00041430764,0.0008057893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011240692,0.00037841834,0.0006129833,0.0012179026,0.037798576,0.008475023,0.0017014975,0.00310589,0.021548983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002695046,0.0005224922,0.00023578283,0.00264078,0.0077528735,0.002309328,0.0028695494,0.0059871455,0.0010023768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005381632,0.000043908476,0.0024655974,0.00015913846,0.000013197202,0.00077714387,0.08779541,0.00025133946,0.00018824753,0.71353483,0.15132825,0.043389175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012414288,0.0000100445795,0.007994663,0.00036781866,0.000009020422,0.00013518865,0.044155143,0.00011075566,0.00009450261,0.0071106716,0.9399659,0.000033882807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99330854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12706757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12706757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16765212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.921944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392089614","doi":"10.51644/9780889208957-003","title":"Notes From The Authors","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.05408763435326005,"score_gpt":0.30404536589944287,"score_spread":0.2499577315461828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392089614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013308178,0.02792903,0.0015023408,0.24727024,0.13019124,0.00011398841,0.0013748558,0.00029781586,0.5899897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007978805,0.007322476,0.00042829095,0.03054219,0.007583878,0.000078688114,0.00034353576,0.00013180872,0.9455903],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999273,0.00014450257,0.000047152273,0.00016057854,0.00030098742,0.000073750794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977076,0.00045265214,0.00008772067,0.0001814637,0.0012804765,0.00028999508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090430287,0.00057946425,0.00045942853,0.0011621376,0.0034305153,0.0033248335,0.0009000011,0.0020444666,0.14760765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057020104,0.00024102037,0.0003339776,0.0012632428,0.00083967077,0.0029043714,0.001974664,0.004233402,0.074590065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009238341,0.0000072497633,0.00006286153,0.000042342803,0.0000011548581,0.00004297164,0.00022017042,0.0000135742375,0.00005756567,0.0099605145,0.97473156,0.0148507925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010422642,0.0000016984999,0.00009498346,0.000056485966,6.451244e-7,0.000033713583,0.00016655862,0.000008674969,0.000033981116,0.00085407414,0.99874544,0.0000025551226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008508729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013733527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14760765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027797022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020597891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49379683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392090891","doi":"10.53386/nilq.v74i4.1024","title":"Assisted Dying Bill [HL]: ignorance within the House?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Parliament; Context (archaeology); Commit; Law; Assisted suicide; Legislature; House of Representatives; Political science; Politics; History","score_opus":0.023755549021291154,"score_gpt":0.28638628133966654,"score_spread":0.26263073231837536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392090891","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00484292,0.01136032,0.0013742514,0.8773714,0.0062557873,0.00002149209,0.00017749028,0.0000618786,0.09853451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23278898,0.016644672,0.0014919247,0.68144566,0.0037755494,0.000037796974,0.00032092855,0.00027370534,0.0632209],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98738873,0.0031102318,0.0005825617,0.0009432944,0.0051370584,0.0028381385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862,0.0055852444,0.0009307858,0.00078728935,0.004363922,0.0021328637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0093834195,0.00025530445,0.00048775412,0.00072430825,0.011100976,0.011230462,0.0021020973,0.007785518,0.010622115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037988074,0.00047210386,0.0004362321,0.0016053384,0.023430008,0.0103185065,0.0035086945,0.014931283,0.0021986356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020802716,0.0000087699245,0.0008882624,0.0001432383,0.000009045482,0.00033310935,0.011822324,0.0000812677,0.000094555,0.32828987,0.6276751,0.03063361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006541855,0.000010833157,0.0023021863,0.0005637566,0.000007915766,0.00028195884,0.008435163,0.000055821278,0.00010068654,0.01256304,0.97562337,0.000048685306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6104399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.670421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6104399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03140898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047064077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7837086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392669586","doi":"10.7202/1109763ar","title":"Equality and the Notwithstanding Clause : Considering the Nature and Application of Section 28 of the Canadian Charter","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Political science; Linguistics; Law; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01632091957409496,"score_gpt":0.2754887323100645,"score_spread":0.2591678127359695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392669586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009077073,0.016406653,0.004626697,0.3597771,0.0061195353,0.00042774135,0.0015025126,0.00013574102,0.6019269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32202628,0.014771767,0.016226767,0.33554527,0.0042829122,0.0010165967,0.0014716308,0.00036228204,0.30429643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94137883,0.0076506184,0.002284535,0.0035606017,0.032054935,0.0130705405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9585756,0.01154666,0.001412421,0.001733068,0.023571724,0.0031606064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022630641,0.00078469847,0.0013064581,0.002513404,0.023639774,0.01655504,0.005967664,0.021264048,0.009313009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07091359,0.0010516699,0.0010816602,0.003897749,0.020554064,0.0072298194,0.0046349973,0.017143125,0.0017982338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023628658,0.000018136321,0.0004852287,0.000078024896,0.000007106073,0.00013742463,0.0041855066,0.0002159656,0.00019361245,0.7862937,0.1993444,0.009017299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006351991,0.000032369146,0.0059793596,0.0010786369,0.000055997938,0.00013235453,0.0061932304,0.00049514836,0.00046355638,0.086763635,0.8984498,0.0002923853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97840333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.984721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91968095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08031907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35629708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58275837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392762064","doi":"10.1558/jsrnc.23942","title":"Mother Earth, Cultural Authenticity, and Canadian Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Study of Religion Nature and Culture","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Earth (classical element); Law; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01602644414647663,"score_gpt":0.32860262003340557,"score_spread":0.31257617588692893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392762064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027921943,0.006603318,0.0011779772,0.11434056,0.0007747693,0.000029547258,0.00008187894,0.0000351839,0.8490347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9133158,0.003107458,0.00092349644,0.010805199,0.00013994578,0.000019316725,0.00004735856,0.000051224542,0.07159021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99343526,0.0018399183,0.0001713463,0.0006165844,0.0017897519,0.0021470448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917551,0.0025092862,0.000535262,0.0006100543,0.0022244116,0.0023659032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060246866,0.00027359123,0.00044796747,0.0023137564,0.03532551,0.015601402,0.002058625,0.004313072,0.021109331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01593499,0.0003161652,0.0002626099,0.002649021,0.048058372,0.0074835587,0.010411757,0.008540624,0.0007688686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050960743,0.000012498423,0.000988059,0.00002343213,0.000002269889,0.00009304383,0.02637066,0.000029565166,0.000022509887,0.9485916,0.014934851,0.00892632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000977999,0.000013114733,0.004816906,0.0004898032,0.000010935596,0.00021393827,0.09269475,0.00017836812,0.0001535087,0.19561669,0.70574063,0.00006155496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90535253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94572455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09464747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07006518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.070064984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50836086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393024726","doi":"10.5040/9798765110164.ch-32","title":"Newfoundland","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.033915502105101254,"score_gpt":0.3399525326334578,"score_spread":0.30603703052835657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393024726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040394292,0.0008276452,0.00014932704,0.0007978088,0.00023609816,0.000017180953,0.003362559,0.00018308777,0.9940224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00051310565,0.00026083502,0.000079995465,0.00013947718,0.000013429291,0.000007586349,0.0006131208,0.00008586492,0.99828655],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944514,0.000045460587,0.00002166776,0.00012570014,0.00019160073,0.00017047385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987734,0.00018437067,0.00007398493,0.00020399742,0.0004200964,0.00034418132],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053558545,0.0010934679,0.00061297393,0.0023636771,0.0031545009,0.0053487807,0.0009667943,0.0019432943,0.82316214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017931849,0.0006819359,0.0004984135,0.0035821656,0.0007487986,0.002306234,0.002809159,0.0018348205,0.606753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035106834,0.000040023275,0.0005822833,0.000105002335,0.000004781357,0.0001129217,0.00008801423,0.00010163451,0.00019335923,0.009598861,0.8584931,0.13064489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003958373,0.0000037541868,0.0010462339,0.00007564455,0.0000019935578,0.00003141562,0.00008106604,0.000040488107,0.000059195714,0.0006176264,0.9980343,0.000004247321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.162126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39459834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.837874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040767924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005124592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32236463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393395848","doi":"","title":"The reception of polygamie in French and in Canadian law with respect to marriage and its effects","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"BC Cancer Agency; China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Law; Genealogy; Political science; History","score_opus":0.02389578717396599,"score_gpt":0.3008607240403981,"score_spread":0.2769649368664321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393395848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.906569,0.0015298276,0.00029904037,0.010597288,0.000054756663,0.000022356251,0.00022558052,0.000013406737,0.08068869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99320143,0.00038085095,0.00006159462,0.00047605942,0.0000111144345,0.000006111036,0.000032151544,0.0000047846374,0.005825786],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944543,0.0010743566,0.00008947411,0.00049642444,0.0018509197,0.0020345268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909533,0.002514958,0.0013089398,0.00029843996,0.0034448516,0.0014796389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035723401,0.00023503228,0.00033908334,0.00282836,0.0148342345,0.0053613223,0.0012238491,0.0011867349,0.008011421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012782663,0.0002533655,0.00025709515,0.0030648892,0.00866898,0.0012312363,0.0031187066,0.0018068547,0.00021318614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002965981,0.00014414379,0.29836845,0.00016616691,0.00013289868,0.0012219583,0.43949142,0.00049388723,0.0021243393,0.17617702,0.013132578,0.06825055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017799563,0.00007590921,0.7164126,0.00017942872,0.0000632835,0.0001844665,0.18395609,0.000300043,0.0005583509,0.0024675368,0.095674954,0.00010950061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9872709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9934105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07985276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07985276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051502947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.579375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393416226","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-11945-4_27-3","title":"Memoirs of Modern Philosophers by Elizabeth Hamilton","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University","funders":"","keywords":"Memoir; Philosophy; History; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.04058052548093509,"score_gpt":0.30157323689060944,"score_spread":0.26099271140967434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393416226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020205409,0.070903495,0.0015963821,0.36331683,0.023342343,0.000045920307,0.00013884027,0.000052763997,0.53858286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033117272,0.02355125,0.000904496,0.064805105,0.0045579807,0.00007897197,0.000033683813,0.00016560806,0.87278575],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999198,0.00036252328,0.00001874124,0.0000779345,0.00023720323,0.00010571491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896836,0.00063936674,0.000035350375,0.000058420643,0.0001841975,0.000114235336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016283528,0.00050704466,0.00044819296,0.0011367736,0.0066423714,0.0044687935,0.0007751402,0.0028063129,0.017883262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028889903,0.00045622262,0.000199395,0.0012244083,0.009766719,0.0049459087,0.0026436185,0.007347569,0.0034048674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009493888,0.000010685203,0.000026822177,0.000044045646,0.0000020171672,0.000041858882,0.0042252215,0.00004955941,0.00006344478,0.38291326,0.6057774,0.0068363296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003425304,0.000002040657,0.00006000664,0.00007538524,8.4067506e-7,0.000019880625,0.0013240814,0.0000217049,0.00002406919,0.023696374,0.97476804,0.0000041296926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039761703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.088810176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039761703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075617884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037628638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079060495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394914589","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.8579","title":"Swimming Up Niagara Falls! The Battle to Get Disability Rights Added to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Battle; Political science; Law; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03491845498282878,"score_gpt":0.3268648556685373,"score_spread":0.29194640068570854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394914589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008800116,0.044223875,0.000754801,0.25541475,0.009634346,0.000052094227,0.00064097013,0.00014462562,0.6803343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08413278,0.029383216,0.001878662,0.03128138,0.0010812675,0.000045364955,0.00033588565,0.00020651116,0.8516549],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861777,0.00013607828,0.000017471972,0.000102492304,0.0006717243,0.00045440454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864906,0.00012752562,0.0000348503,0.000052518906,0.00070584455,0.00043021678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008679715,0.00044484914,0.00034495167,0.001291932,0.02188832,0.00682894,0.0008263301,0.0017522242,0.023174522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019833078,0.00026796345,0.00019223099,0.0020130964,0.006479101,0.0030614296,0.002382031,0.0037125682,0.0026908936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013328619,0.0000100492225,0.0006026234,0.00009551856,0.0000029587234,0.00013032141,0.012759083,0.000038377213,0.00018825043,0.077507555,0.8585059,0.05014602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011063903,0.0000018520567,0.00061207905,0.00007379286,0.0000013390554,0.000026373653,0.004715863,0.0000074051395,0.000036401645,0.0010030455,0.9935144,0.0000062214076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97392386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99391633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044289205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044289205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08147739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32134217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395458533","doi":"10.1515/9780228020219-004","title":"1 An Historic Canadian Compromise: Forty Years after the Patriation of the Constitution, Should We Cheer a Little?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Constitution; History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027766954085768427,"score_gpt":0.24036175159116316,"score_spread":0.21259479750539473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395458533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00918531,0.013860619,0.0006006461,0.14319016,0.0033953045,0.000032149866,0.00033624898,0.00007607772,0.8293234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18635638,0.0041986634,0.00053187326,0.0349316,0.0006105359,0.00003270889,0.00010413906,0.00013558764,0.77309847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661595,0.0003891158,0.00003333072,0.0003411689,0.0012556908,0.0013647036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986993,0.00020163524,0.000048494694,0.00006323616,0.0007038298,0.00028351048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018575223,0.0007162648,0.00040684876,0.0014300178,0.03484959,0.012558595,0.0014392957,0.007415495,0.020367002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005109566,0.0004652891,0.00041215896,0.0026108106,0.018028446,0.004276529,0.0025775984,0.010858764,0.0018846501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020041954,0.000007334655,0.0002578483,0.000027023181,0.0000036279685,0.00010104785,0.007607022,0.00008356607,0.00007049368,0.73586214,0.2474362,0.008523629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051879765,0.0000044047333,0.0009029687,0.00010725953,0.0000059859317,0.00004311556,0.005021006,0.000055233595,0.000101976366,0.012182784,0.9815413,0.000028804436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98603386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99484044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12317153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12317153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1362966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89367616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686867","doi":"10.29173/mlj1321","title":"In Memoriam – Marcel André Desautels","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alma mater; Art; Philosophy; Art history; Medicine; Surgery","score_opus":0.04922164148513974,"score_gpt":0.32404173038876416,"score_spread":0.2748200889036244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686867","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000193415,0.010550584,0.00022840913,0.6043448,0.37149677,0.000024144696,0.000156884,0.000119035496,0.012886036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010496812,0.013527515,0.0005803341,0.50116134,0.22869374,0.00014045982,0.00018344623,0.000244877,0.24497154],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99609095,0.00066830416,0.00027852153,0.0008879338,0.0016711811,0.0004029682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991488,0.0019189714,0.0004902434,0.00037475943,0.0042213807,0.0015065713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035324672,0.001219964,0.0012353297,0.000796665,0.00474825,0.006302244,0.001724634,0.0065329024,0.020130834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027012711,0.00046652422,0.00072771334,0.00038577718,0.0022984443,0.0032937215,0.0029320493,0.019804921,0.021559445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075954617,0.0000029910605,0.000017311533,0.0000147784185,0.0000015803835,0.00005533687,0.000049396032,0.000008474037,0.000024396883,0.00093341665,0.9964078,0.0024768298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024107667,0.000003823807,0.000064419706,0.000057522466,0.0000016036059,0.00011349395,0.000079501304,0.000016606442,0.00005530262,0.00041903675,0.9991805,0.0000057584075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010187154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014523842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020130834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040039443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006089103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06734437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715366","doi":"10.29173/mlj1284","title":"The Troubled History of the Defence of Duress and Excluded Offences: Could the Reasoned Use of Mitigation on Sentencing Prevent Duress from (Further) Becoming Archaic, Gendered, and Completely Inaccessible?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; Northern Ontario Academic Medicine Association; Thunder Bay Regional Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal code; Supreme court; Criminal law; Criminology; Perspective (graphical); Code (set theory); Sociology; Self defense; Penal code; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.095224158221756,"score_gpt":0.2857996469679759,"score_spread":0.19057548874621988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18239205,0.04422007,0.007794422,0.22701702,0.0021047248,0.000078409204,0.00014678542,0.00006225489,0.5361843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9517696,0.010979168,0.0013522838,0.011916559,0.00041317122,0.0000381497,0.000034539742,0.000042929565,0.023453472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949751,0.0027865043,0.00012857329,0.0003602301,0.0009008008,0.0008487315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99412775,0.0028617675,0.00039950406,0.00042716137,0.0015563783,0.00062749715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006153359,0.00030517633,0.00040401923,0.0019488483,0.023124602,0.007831542,0.0018205193,0.0037480884,0.0021012642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012076724,0.00042199888,0.00022960475,0.0017827232,0.068910725,0.005329214,0.0039317342,0.010055092,0.00028438424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000136519675,0.000011760832,0.0010638443,0.00006356064,0.0000052766813,0.00034708262,0.093603075,0.00013179456,0.00018249833,0.88734525,0.0041554198,0.013076819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001751768,0.000078610385,0.011735181,0.00222739,0.00002592137,0.0011447794,0.13210209,0.0004288808,0.0010419603,0.17506467,0.6759858,0.00014726915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6372726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7224735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6372726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042143285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046762757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72972715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715372","doi":"10.29173/mlj1287","title":"The Availability of the Common Law Defence of Duress to Principals Charged with Murder: An Analysis of the Conflicting Appellate Decisions in R v Willis (TAW) and R v Aravena","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Appeal; Common law; Charter; Political science; Subject (documents); Criminal code; Criminal law","score_opus":0.03158350375343633,"score_gpt":0.30953558830065786,"score_spread":0.27795208454722153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64765584,0.0057374686,0.002515101,0.026596133,0.00028801407,0.0003655418,0.00046544263,0.000026480608,0.31635004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96710604,0.002316397,0.0012025782,0.007209836,0.00018087156,0.00012287722,0.00017329986,0.00006057832,0.02162757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98102057,0.0031325766,0.00081315683,0.0013630949,0.00714004,0.006530519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97468954,0.013880682,0.0016518385,0.00077875744,0.007267521,0.0017317213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014587636,0.00044517533,0.0016408133,0.0049505006,0.01292293,0.016146448,0.0067786737,0.013046731,0.0033970596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034034576,0.0015606433,0.0021064547,0.0049183522,0.012994112,0.0042346003,0.004453239,0.013019234,0.0005017376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002416913,0.00014751864,0.0118214805,0.00019974085,0.00010055994,0.003643466,0.049209118,0.0009304022,0.0015131328,0.91079456,0.010425443,0.010972791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042544253,0.00069810404,0.16630287,0.0028526857,0.0010211858,0.0033364017,0.15674065,0.009417537,0.0059346682,0.21611057,0.43590337,0.0012565495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62131244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7689637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37868756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035714447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030138059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76183546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715378","doi":"10.29173/mlj1282","title":"The Slow Death of the Reasonable Steps Requirement for the Mistake of Age Defence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Legislature; Mistake; Law; Mens rea; Appeal; Plaintiff; Legislative history; Statutory law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Criminal code; Judicial interpretation; Criminal law; Criminology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0693075581115432,"score_gpt":0.30366684533129534,"score_spread":0.23435928721975213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10713664,0.0020687093,0.11449284,0.171238,0.0027893519,0.00031330372,0.0002609131,0.00043253115,0.6012677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8862594,0.00054557563,0.023159793,0.04205113,0.0005422021,0.0002808522,0.000068806636,0.0001743615,0.04691791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97949123,0.0043928633,0.0013151118,0.0024671778,0.01012733,0.0022062387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96830064,0.015727272,0.0022964317,0.0043391604,0.008072203,0.0012643468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019405195,0.00038274153,0.0006389344,0.00097464066,0.005197589,0.0050113946,0.0028521747,0.013391048,0.00459858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06443077,0.00076641183,0.0009990247,0.00045687627,0.022673136,0.0068378267,0.004208902,0.020667443,0.0017588248],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015644484,0.000009227913,0.0005328164,0.000018996487,0.000005132939,0.00015287468,0.0017873695,0.00010680711,0.00044497318,0.9883642,0.0044503706,0.0041115363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087628374,0.00013098432,0.0026183426,0.0003908747,0.00006170667,0.0007888592,0.0022883855,0.0021016786,0.003924466,0.7752739,0.21217397,0.00015912758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05642619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06084263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94357383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075698937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017620197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11219549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715964","doi":"10.29173/mlj1144","title":"Introduction from the Manitoba Law Journal – The Life and Works of Chief Justice Hugh Amos Robson","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.03482916747232801,"score_gpt":0.26642612660168985,"score_spread":0.23159695912936185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715964","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006575664,0.14426635,0.0002381442,0.28568697,0.32844526,0.00019582316,0.002519019,0.00025331925,0.23773761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033947672,0.06807023,0.00031184356,0.12168328,0.18344711,0.00019963601,0.001417739,0.00035072066,0.62112474],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704176,0.00033723048,0.00022815935,0.00026460865,0.001764629,0.00036349602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98442197,0.003432588,0.0006977285,0.00036383458,0.0072071757,0.0038767038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021886346,0.0019822395,0.0014481306,0.008512969,0.008245186,0.008941255,0.00214251,0.0063123843,0.13657232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073678517,0.0010352659,0.0007743646,0.0066893897,0.0022960147,0.0035946032,0.0039032693,0.0063946983,0.046751723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002841231,0.000006612804,0.000037646387,0.00004431892,6.8954336e-7,0.000019422809,0.00006336421,0.000004724543,0.000022106175,0.00043815604,0.9968593,0.002500824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036627819,0.000005789278,0.00079476926,0.00027918787,0.0000018219064,0.000038866805,0.00025257692,0.0000054460284,0.000009725758,0.00027919776,0.9983217,0.000007210791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1656722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4319334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8343278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012962819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020729097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4568799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396716920","doi":"10.29173/mlj980","title":"Issue Overview and Introduction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.05280174504289466,"score_gpt":0.33921114073490916,"score_spread":0.2864093956920145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396716920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00081850315,0.032433987,0.0014297592,0.11689965,0.3661292,0.0007232415,0.007940622,0.00090648734,0.47271848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0063556507,0.027417932,0.0012386111,0.056524657,0.13737895,0.0007034587,0.0068151164,0.0007415472,0.762824],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971199,0.00028618146,0.0002355176,0.00047289638,0.0014495787,0.0004360285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891235,0.0012344685,0.00066396815,0.0007637513,0.006732077,0.0014822474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003620304,0.001424325,0.0011402213,0.0077556837,0.004731581,0.010833063,0.002989385,0.006153181,0.23632352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013927693,0.00075177365,0.0011009843,0.006677067,0.0016642126,0.0057116076,0.0039043631,0.0047885836,0.1420216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013586894,0.000016111926,0.00011364218,0.00030647972,0.000002034041,0.000041328545,0.00006244038,0.000027612576,0.00011942012,0.0041525257,0.97244126,0.022703595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014685663,0.0000055395108,0.00027669425,0.00020949716,0.0000013484987,0.000020934065,0.000034641926,0.000010114416,0.000027256834,0.00040330234,0.99900585,0.0000032922965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011950126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015493478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23632352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052966215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010748717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7905809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396784731","doi":"10.7202/1111194ar","title":"Gatekeeping Reconciliation: The Supreme Court of Canada’s Piecemeal Erosion of Aboriginal Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Section (typography); Context (archaeology); Charter; Sociology; History; Business","score_opus":0.02823347896043296,"score_gpt":0.3104470827724549,"score_spread":0.282213603812022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396784731","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061213188,0.023475993,0.0031966462,0.46679258,0.002846645,0.00019319497,0.0008356922,0.000104660154,0.44134137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77451336,0.006491655,0.0023293314,0.11909497,0.0009259907,0.00012492579,0.00023058325,0.00012437788,0.09616485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.974962,0.0031602278,0.00061609433,0.0023298368,0.010681088,0.008250785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981012,0.006639238,0.0006780265,0.0012024738,0.008648994,0.0018193057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015251007,0.0004871719,0.00088543486,0.0014859863,0.040527325,0.019972092,0.0059505105,0.019304208,0.004755981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03229275,0.0008070151,0.0007524631,0.0033160755,0.024028039,0.0050998307,0.0055639725,0.02305312,0.00044536125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041611278,0.00002036548,0.0015696043,0.00007207133,0.000037623573,0.0005340776,0.012550532,0.00043911036,0.00026611023,0.77710176,0.19283052,0.014536718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001337223,0.00003619619,0.012464087,0.00090368104,0.00022943468,0.00029490326,0.017821243,0.0016338397,0.001376851,0.13501869,0.8297554,0.00033190555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.987515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1432853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1432853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30889392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396791495","doi":"10.4324/9781003496236-3","title":"Images and Three Traditional Subjects of Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06657831899299822,"score_gpt":0.2708167723471757,"score_spread":0.2042384533541775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396791495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013651157,0.002345531,0.0009878665,0.008734203,0.00015809604,0.000024088898,0.000058885154,0.000019857913,0.97402024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7537479,0.002648206,0.0015251577,0.0021972263,0.00016091211,0.00006299756,0.000055242373,0.0000833405,0.23951896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791175,0.00044840266,0.000027739716,0.0001905108,0.0006857529,0.00073573814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985165,0.0005088595,0.000060875827,0.00011914215,0.00049411407,0.0003005365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015177049,0.00051756465,0.0003394791,0.0027874918,0.02745208,0.016513154,0.0017536309,0.0030411775,0.0134596685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033118024,0.00033107877,0.00029595147,0.0044898507,0.05865709,0.0041213217,0.0026580354,0.005573624,0.000607244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022413212,0.000002618791,0.00004940368,0.000005227794,3.1753942e-7,0.00001566617,0.007379297,0.000016400272,0.00002167956,0.98574674,0.004184176,0.0025763155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014472055,0.000009730617,0.0028458345,0.00019386012,0.000011329171,0.00012407248,0.03838903,0.0003326047,0.0002941719,0.42517957,0.5325631,0.000042268282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9195943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96430767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080669686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.080669686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06638903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5853023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396887528","doi":"10.29173/mlj955","title":"Full-Time Teachers, Recorders &amp; Librarians of the Manitoba Law School and of the Faculty of Law, University of Manitoba","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03220198426901122,"score_gpt":0.24874069991692802,"score_spread":0.2165387156479168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396887528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5314056,0.008392624,0.0045448933,0.046175573,0.000977594,0.0022297085,0.03002574,0.0031616315,0.3730866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18745025,0.004065311,0.008714764,0.00895814,0.00020227795,0.0005147427,0.0033649057,0.0005115322,0.786218],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965321,0.0007397803,0.0003757126,0.0005532707,0.0012335246,0.0005655637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96770656,0.00456101,0.0032474967,0.0019353094,0.011810836,0.010738721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032959557,0.0005491051,0.0006046111,0.00822646,0.016806798,0.0063549113,0.0020004124,0.0009403734,0.13326606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010750513,0.0017721663,0.00018032572,0.009418203,0.0024677399,0.0033370182,0.0022934962,0.0012959193,0.02974897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034072937,0.0008294547,0.2957922,0.0012626818,0.00008699722,0.0027396907,0.054647487,0.00012356935,0.009267565,0.00642501,0.3369926,0.29149204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053180498,0.00013117713,0.27817217,0.00040091728,0.000056036468,0.0010959362,0.08057041,0.00025766774,0.0040878826,0.00062755984,0.6344426,0.000104403465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4642713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79960775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4642713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013152224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08774379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9231379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398234539","doi":"10.3366/irss.2024.0028","title":"John Campbell’s Authorship of <i>Reflections on the Rise and Progress of the British Constitution</i> (London, 1761)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Scottish Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; History; Philosophy; Sociology; Art history; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06780227625654527,"score_gpt":0.4078452706375628,"score_spread":0.34004299438101754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398234539","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019105932,0.46975014,0.0013414389,0.2625275,0.06462092,0.00004268199,0.0003154034,0.000059859405,0.19943155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09893739,0.34287483,0.0026334277,0.10194845,0.028698223,0.00015525293,0.00035946697,0.0002645852,0.42412844],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958431,0.0017166146,0.00019063985,0.00037213546,0.0015471191,0.0003303985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957594,0.0025145996,0.00024545964,0.0001834889,0.00088931515,0.00040767723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002486046,0.0007441002,0.000497414,0.0020967158,0.0048341947,0.0054410887,0.0009918049,0.0032709623,0.009038323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009316278,0.00037330028,0.00025836827,0.0028590928,0.009412691,0.0038370248,0.0019162009,0.0054139975,0.002691677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016532593,0.0000069684547,0.00011317538,0.00028937357,0.0000048167267,0.000112758986,0.008367051,0.00003595761,0.000112946254,0.074863285,0.8925929,0.023484189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001772224,0.000002214509,0.0001973075,0.00029227452,9.686031e-7,0.000047002413,0.0011633325,0.000004772968,0.00004100217,0.0022210467,0.99602294,0.0000053220515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06452474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11896957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06452474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066835373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009931728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12829834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020539","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.047","title":"5 February 1749. <i>Thomas Cannon and Hannah Simpson</i> v. <i>John Cleland</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.019748472104742065,"score_gpt":0.2966724527635549,"score_spread":0.27692398065881285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022363589,0.0059175277,0.0002013269,0.006728899,0.008978767,0.000064876265,0.004782497,0.00042311556,0.9726793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005315444,0.00081318925,0.000034176483,0.0007957658,0.0003449582,0.0000179299,0.00041100685,0.00010305407,0.9969483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965906,0.000032941243,0.000019250754,0.0000634148,0.00016222862,0.00006310291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993032,0.00012925395,0.00003987265,0.00005166281,0.00033377355,0.00014212931],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005854585,0.000883526,0.00047618532,0.001667938,0.002204537,0.003854481,0.000978439,0.0022758315,0.5937338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026988895,0.00042675753,0.00036778479,0.0015722765,0.0005385523,0.0022029192,0.001580943,0.0022738576,0.4589681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017101433,0.000003932572,0.00005225129,0.00005239685,0.0000010468747,0.0000221465,0.00003971904,0.000010680616,0.000057951638,0.0033475861,0.983826,0.012569099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019862405,0.0000027896463,0.00029243666,0.00006468612,6.4264617e-7,0.000011406112,0.000034247118,0.0000053172703,0.000024572275,0.0002313993,0.99932873,0.0000018407934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02772729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.072518155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5937338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001897628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012157654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57948947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020586","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.036","title":"18 July 1740. Cleland to William Frederick Boscawen, Richard Wood, and Feilder Freeman","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Art history; Environmental ethics; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028945378234910866,"score_gpt":0.32000438654963637,"score_spread":0.2910590083147255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001535829,0.0014830356,0.00018973733,0.0034039607,0.004468146,0.00006962089,0.004794699,0.00060723815,0.9848299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002904392,0.00030023372,0.000033547913,0.0003304064,0.00015582678,0.000016542266,0.00051776285,0.000098698576,0.9982565],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997712,0.000025773097,0.000012137855,0.000041935484,0.00010230134,0.000046671412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924004,0.00009647998,0.00003153635,0.00005174337,0.000352531,0.00022766172],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048762045,0.00074748317,0.00051923183,0.0011751956,0.0018626854,0.003083714,0.0008156473,0.0015967991,0.8419536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020282122,0.0004001479,0.00032225397,0.001207678,0.0004130792,0.0014136039,0.001568412,0.0015893589,0.7674209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013145504,0.0000036670115,0.000026855116,0.000026787307,4.955836e-7,0.000013650975,0.000011312666,0.0000065680997,0.000028864522,0.0007973924,0.9891444,0.009926895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029895073,0.0000026503353,0.00021945186,0.0000425209,3.6674464e-7,0.000006956469,0.000021154321,0.0000068745385,0.00001534509,0.000115022005,0.99956506,0.0000014831221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014133366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037787054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8419536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012522449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001168659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22543406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020619","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.125","title":"26 May 1772. Cleland to David Garrick","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Art history; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.03360520006053416,"score_gpt":0.3501402866678603,"score_spread":0.3165350866073261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017994491,0.004041657,0.00023182527,0.0057456046,0.0075067845,0.00008942579,0.0046493923,0.0006232603,0.97693217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003206009,0.0005698601,0.00003616945,0.00048218883,0.00018893927,0.0000139256035,0.00044404564,0.00008358287,0.9978607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997608,0.000024206507,0.000010032462,0.000041954892,0.00012394754,0.000039034345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994456,0.000073594114,0.00002389012,0.000038348317,0.00028566498,0.00013277892],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038175218,0.0006486934,0.0005205351,0.0012560687,0.0014806604,0.0029637318,0.0008347573,0.0013823687,0.7480916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018059389,0.00036167467,0.000289336,0.00113657,0.00030888148,0.0012939645,0.0012475319,0.0014960918,0.6388161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010495082,0.0000027097494,0.000016082447,0.000026087988,4.888611e-7,0.00001531437,0.0000096897065,0.000008011597,0.000026297665,0.000784521,0.99021834,0.0088819405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002060671,0.0000020389957,0.00013745017,0.000041178893,4.0008746e-7,0.000008198774,0.00001951921,0.000005673392,0.00001568613,0.00013337395,0.99963295,0.000001528402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013160253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03677961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7480916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012999431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000981176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35931677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020728","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.122","title":"22 May 1772. Cleland to David Garrick","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Art history","score_opus":0.031712900535081426,"score_gpt":0.3497209934884181,"score_spread":0.3180080929533367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001795704,0.0039761416,0.00023245274,0.006078324,0.008037766,0.000080805905,0.0041831583,0.0006319776,0.9766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003286681,0.00056667323,0.00003593095,0.00051943836,0.00019732078,0.000013406593,0.0004163887,0.00008849239,0.99783367],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997558,0.000025609917,0.000010246824,0.000044034092,0.00012428332,0.00004002855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994561,0.000075113225,0.000022977292,0.000037463407,0.0002785448,0.00012981112],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037655103,0.000639811,0.0005140459,0.0012352137,0.0015440682,0.0030275772,0.0008390721,0.0014161364,0.74468225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018370776,0.00035752423,0.00028261467,0.001115086,0.00031750818,0.0013426917,0.0012929529,0.0015500622,0.63578326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009915332,0.000002498949,0.000016299051,0.000024417559,4.7102404e-7,0.000015936492,0.000010227766,0.0000073892015,0.000024762165,0.0007964155,0.99003536,0.009056285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018539637,0.0000018282345,0.00012493841,0.00003809091,3.8586987e-7,0.000008391932,0.00002020132,0.000005303427,0.000015264382,0.00012895813,0.99965334,0.0000014699933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013234847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03664272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74468225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012865927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000976583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36417973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020754","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.060","title":"27 November 1750. Letter from the Duke of Newcastle to the Attorney General Urging Prosecution of Various Individuals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03771595521746443,"score_gpt":0.3165811328130732,"score_spread":0.2788651775956088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027254405,0.00472076,0.00020059985,0.047170695,0.019352974,0.00021241627,0.004068799,0.00029629635,0.92125195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021433025,0.00025510474,0.000025654306,0.00303049,0.00026710663,0.00002511134,0.00018513143,0.00003469654,0.9940334],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937516,0.00006776401,0.00003841402,0.000076123775,0.00024102503,0.00020163685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884844,0.00020946334,0.00005065224,0.000050176794,0.0005584006,0.00028284712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073559914,0.00070312864,0.000551525,0.0009248864,0.0059957923,0.0031983212,0.0009956937,0.0058533424,0.2823543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051423376,0.00062755425,0.00041490362,0.00059382024,0.0009092669,0.0013025221,0.0018944001,0.0051934365,0.17089356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044845787,0.000008839473,0.00021541175,0.000039604514,0.0000024212789,0.00020674124,0.00016866022,0.000009193034,0.00011389821,0.0017429544,0.993548,0.003899448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007811681,0.0000136250865,0.0022852137,0.0000757867,0.0000027000697,0.000051998744,0.00032938895,0.0000188589,0.000083783416,0.00032737246,0.9967944,0.0000090268795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12134925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3471933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2823543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035802259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024797784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94456923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020792","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.097","title":"[September 1762]. Undated Letter from Frances Mayne to Thomas Pichon","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.028603941280840334,"score_gpt":0.3283766305792313,"score_spread":0.29977268929839096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011675943,0.008663206,0.00024130165,0.121497594,0.04190755,0.00012339724,0.0019826193,0.0002700683,0.82414675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002287758,0.0006837739,0.00003619978,0.023682136,0.002116124,0.000044976616,0.00016704704,0.00004809294,0.9709338],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955434,0.0000612906,0.000020615716,0.000068302405,0.00016777737,0.00012763294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993656,0.00015160027,0.000032892964,0.000027602666,0.00028724127,0.00013505369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069208286,0.00064343476,0.0003909643,0.000722439,0.004970059,0.0030143103,0.00066478807,0.005344886,0.15896848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035241232,0.00039946876,0.00034413347,0.00057186215,0.00056815497,0.0014302057,0.0012852522,0.004583988,0.092044845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010537055,0.000002310405,0.000046966805,0.000012066157,6.6744053e-7,0.00005700973,0.000048418933,0.0000033083347,0.000027020094,0.0015559864,0.9957279,0.0025078172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038672865,0.0000033095598,0.0004962714,0.000040635034,7.918016e-7,0.00003603915,0.0000806302,0.00000814267,0.000020795338,0.00031672698,0.9989887,0.000004039041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03908061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09793385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15896848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018333051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017891957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53180254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020801","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.041","title":"1 January 1742. Extract of a Letter from Alexander Pope to Hugh Bethel","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ancient history; History; Theology; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.04049260145206411,"score_gpt":0.33776340407114713,"score_spread":0.297270802619083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007716794,0.003667225,0.00016338447,0.025425697,0.010866339,0.00011864026,0.008247811,0.0003363095,0.95040303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010696314,0.0004488184,0.000030062263,0.0032850772,0.0005983923,0.000029977607,0.0006872657,0.00006247537,0.9937883],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996667,0.000033928034,0.000015095902,0.000038368868,0.00018181135,0.00006405094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989613,0.00034456057,0.00004849354,0.0000422391,0.00043689166,0.00016649424],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004873194,0.0005398294,0.00039010556,0.0011004469,0.0022789834,0.0024697338,0.0005999103,0.0024707292,0.41855663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040202895,0.000377852,0.00022574478,0.0012133417,0.0003792858,0.000984783,0.0011183615,0.002017529,0.3012928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012578459,0.0000028990112,0.00002953525,0.00002292523,5.440208e-7,0.000024022042,0.000022947694,0.000004505252,0.000035278306,0.00074720907,0.99525803,0.003839552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072648872,0.000006459313,0.00091245153,0.000055780627,0.0000010438512,0.00001799178,0.0000642789,0.000012118202,0.000041814277,0.00040662242,0.99847037,0.0000037903994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027816957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05993001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41855663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018228464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012922377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8293584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020806","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.056","title":"15 March 1750. Warrant for the Detention of Cleland and Others following Publication of <i>Memoirs of Fanny Hill</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Memoir; Law; History; Art; Art history; Political science; Economics; Financial economics","score_opus":0.031172128481501443,"score_gpt":0.32631126298534663,"score_spread":0.2951391345038452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000588266,0.0014934855,0.0001783153,0.003923064,0.009301593,0.000098140634,0.006631646,0.00036629013,0.97741914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009571588,0.00022543216,0.000038585218,0.0005089061,0.0002814942,0.000028933353,0.0004935398,0.00009816333,0.9973678],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997558,0.00002640936,0.000014606194,0.000033879514,0.00011649734,0.00005281099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999522,0.00006367716,0.000029278774,0.000040114945,0.00023078678,0.00011410413],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060706085,0.0006849803,0.0004376516,0.0010348354,0.0025328514,0.0035145166,0.00084845297,0.0017562907,0.5474962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00273352,0.0003506941,0.0003519061,0.0009597592,0.00054968323,0.0013391445,0.001544802,0.002026091,0.42098933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004225872,0.0000070192223,0.00009166853,0.000066428685,0.0000017498606,0.00004671988,0.00008920545,0.000012932173,0.0001138592,0.004008786,0.9838971,0.011622143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035844985,0.000005141363,0.00060117024,0.000052773175,7.759869e-7,0.000012735801,0.00006307028,0.0000062737536,0.000039328297,0.00030689593,0.99890566,0.0000024864164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031110706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09272145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5474962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018165826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001175635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6454418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020810","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.003","title":"26 August 1730. Cleland’s Appointment as Attorney","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03294699689707093,"score_gpt":0.33564740685479943,"score_spread":0.3027004099577285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00057868654,0.0011351927,0.00016156127,0.008441291,0.006081759,0.00019544552,0.0051704934,0.0006707151,0.9775648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00081365963,0.00013069955,0.000030219073,0.0009140198,0.00018283358,0.000031290863,0.00040878428,0.0000853286,0.9974032],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993698,0.000056906425,0.000026959764,0.000095339594,0.00029136045,0.0001596248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988914,0.00013900724,0.000033093813,0.000073105395,0.0005908543,0.0002725565],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010306682,0.000589812,0.00063411094,0.0009264082,0.0036986151,0.004555668,0.0011268809,0.004226481,0.6025804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003687937,0.00047191043,0.00039993587,0.0007955388,0.00044842562,0.0012811926,0.001485426,0.0033179559,0.45472866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013011392,0.0000068932577,0.000048298443,0.000017578259,6.853198e-7,0.000033618882,0.000016861599,0.000005068345,0.000054978995,0.0009683643,0.9943144,0.004520414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064925794,0.0000087542,0.0008240011,0.00005735391,0.0000012115751,0.000018085113,0.000062832616,0.000020723792,0.000055303302,0.00019252725,0.99874794,0.0000047242306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03744599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11993824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6025804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025366468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025915068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5668708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020912","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.090","title":"6 March 1758. Cleland to Lucy Cleland ()","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.033383232931334744,"score_gpt":0.356475338468462,"score_spread":0.3230921055371273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017443758,0.0013112479,0.00016164457,0.0027560133,0.0037630165,0.00008553358,0.006106599,0.00063930935,0.9850022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00040399286,0.00030651526,0.000045137975,0.00043491437,0.00018023262,0.000021177566,0.0008465587,0.0001461709,0.9976152],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976164,0.000030832827,0.0000132901805,0.000040504106,0.000108305336,0.000045284512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931693,0.00010110675,0.000032463246,0.000053645486,0.00029432875,0.00020140773],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046068867,0.00063518883,0.00045493152,0.0011353629,0.0013742441,0.0031094518,0.00081113057,0.0015321004,0.84133744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021063616,0.00036916725,0.00027798244,0.0011138597,0.00034554774,0.0016459902,0.0014637902,0.0013661269,0.7472765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016661643,0.0000036229428,0.00002256441,0.000036857124,4.3582475e-7,0.000014667966,0.000011321184,0.000006485134,0.000024294763,0.00068129454,0.9868795,0.0123023335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031721427,0.0000027860601,0.00016135756,0.000043194348,3.029625e-7,0.0000071110685,0.00001861792,0.000004760965,0.000012737515,0.00010310911,0.99964154,0.0000013586346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012496194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031924993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84133744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010848267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008746939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22631282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020920","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.022","title":"18 February 1736. George Williamson to John Braddyll","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Art; Art history","score_opus":0.03363426519958222,"score_gpt":0.3337589494710615,"score_spread":0.30012468427147926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019732691,0.0064418525,0.0003192755,0.012047499,0.015419357,0.00007340067,0.0033165098,0.00081819063,0.9613665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00032382316,0.0008276294,0.000037242804,0.0006003729,0.0003052764,0.000010773403,0.0003286282,0.00010586363,0.9974605],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971503,0.000031694537,0.000012589768,0.00005084745,0.0001408468,0.000048934646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992786,0.0000847791,0.000033455803,0.000055380886,0.00036316662,0.00018454311],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005067352,0.00073311967,0.00045509325,0.0010934534,0.0014021618,0.0032383818,0.0008593881,0.0013476016,0.73846555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002386436,0.00037088763,0.00025156452,0.0010206234,0.0003639759,0.001777789,0.0014606258,0.0014805631,0.6331115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008866268,0.000002441335,0.000013859929,0.000023099321,4.7910163e-7,0.000012547461,0.000012377271,0.000004521577,0.000029709458,0.00094781164,0.98746455,0.011479689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012032915,0.0000015421111,0.00008999921,0.000034427994,3.2381334e-7,0.000006315779,0.000018881094,0.0000029490668,0.000012494896,0.00012991452,0.999701,0.0000010290422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011272013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0280103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73846555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010723313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011675067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3730471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399021030","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.019","title":"10 February 1736. Order for Cleland to Accompany John Braddyll to Surat","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); History; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.037604817990374614,"score_gpt":0.34662868394330526,"score_spread":0.30902386595293063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399021030","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020365456,0.00033870578,0.0001950936,0.001633409,0.0024736035,0.0000774683,0.0055875345,0.00071159244,0.9887788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00032810814,0.000077475896,0.000031205713,0.00016702474,0.000059629183,0.000012531122,0.00054943503,0.00013074736,0.99864393],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997769,0.00002206389,0.000010098869,0.00003592663,0.00010615027,0.000048791484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992079,0.00010530744,0.00002910285,0.0000654233,0.00035770552,0.0002345825],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000497414,0.00064500776,0.0005858154,0.0008975639,0.0019156436,0.003578321,0.000900348,0.001519941,0.90011847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024017526,0.00044327867,0.0003148432,0.00095961115,0.00041628274,0.0014929319,0.001419097,0.0016797747,0.855561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002297141,0.000006737172,0.00004590255,0.00003485195,8.0310264e-7,0.000023583809,0.00002148539,0.000007144758,0.00008315446,0.0009984509,0.9881075,0.0106474105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000483985,0.000005614206,0.00035575803,0.000037271227,6.442931e-7,0.000011463284,0.000047762234,0.000012775833,0.000048122693,0.00022546537,0.99924755,0.00000267529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015345025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049043722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90011847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011925368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010288277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14246881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399021033","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.026","title":"2 March 1736. Extract of a Letter from William Henry Draper to the Court of Directors","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Art history; Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.026612467766830992,"score_gpt":0.3185015255740767,"score_spread":0.29188905780724567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399021033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007140591,0.001361934,0.00016701913,0.014720492,0.0045828223,0.00013564437,0.0057310252,0.00025259718,0.9723345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014854532,0.00019717401,0.000036293026,0.003088538,0.00032559506,0.000035464673,0.0005287874,0.00006366417,0.994239],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994248,0.000055230277,0.00002406276,0.000059246708,0.00031753682,0.000119118566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988563,0.0002944179,0.000044692104,0.0000587521,0.0005891284,0.00015672336],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007106853,0.0005590328,0.00040072796,0.001014874,0.0037658287,0.003573866,0.0008585815,0.0033128385,0.37088674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004471367,0.00052255293,0.00033213658,0.0010306877,0.00051375985,0.0010264473,0.001110597,0.0032417944,0.23586074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015370242,0.0000044682806,0.00004201612,0.000018613044,8.180676e-7,0.00004628827,0.000034280627,0.0000056751737,0.00006254935,0.0017816315,0.99499375,0.002994564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008457573,0.000005810461,0.00093766523,0.000049390517,0.0000017821455,0.000022080761,0.00009478987,0.000017744267,0.000069616,0.00062585965,0.9981615,0.000005346174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06557512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14859276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37088674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027457138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021022793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8973537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399036155","doi":"10.29173/mlj734","title":"The Manitoba Court of Appeal, 2000-2004: Caseload, Output and Citations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.03706069869124262,"score_gpt":0.29341855927945304,"score_spread":0.2563578605882104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399036155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6157463,0.037072204,0.00094338454,0.05057409,0.0015115205,0.0007144512,0.11786885,0.00048762266,0.17508164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74109244,0.022813665,0.002353543,0.0068549146,0.0007333547,0.00054338085,0.033632815,0.00023785756,0.19173802],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968816,0.00021237697,0.00016119666,0.0001960887,0.0020104905,0.0005382741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772156,0.004962655,0.002265986,0.0005385259,0.012595261,0.0024219423],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025129905,0.00037685625,0.00037686093,0.02165515,0.007455542,0.0066434885,0.0020272164,0.0012025423,0.010226111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023679215,0.0007961501,0.00021020054,0.041318994,0.002355763,0.0015254848,0.00232851,0.0013410163,0.0019983517],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019033428,0.00014922707,0.46419778,0.0008050055,0.000114836475,0.0020621251,0.02669389,0.00043018174,0.0011755928,0.016291955,0.39742982,0.09045922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002198019,0.00003600729,0.78581494,0.0004883907,0.000052723608,0.00046553792,0.015366752,0.00036874207,0.00059524586,0.001608145,0.19508907,0.00009242504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96086425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98947024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97834486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06033017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.071682625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43772805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399040300","doi":"10.29173/mlj744","title":"Try, Try Again: Appeals from the Manitoba Court of Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada 2000-2004","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Remand (court procedure)","score_opus":0.021468740787804995,"score_gpt":0.2508587548802448,"score_spread":0.22939001409243978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399040300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35000888,0.011227047,0.00042640942,0.3217069,0.0026989745,0.0006110136,0.004108482,0.00011157849,0.30910075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5586768,0.0053003137,0.0007414739,0.15737909,0.00067535153,0.00033140328,0.000926114,0.000110302484,0.2758592],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99509734,0.0003626498,0.000131837,0.00033175852,0.0018311306,0.0022453568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99171937,0.0025950035,0.00022820734,0.00016332793,0.0036724017,0.0016216645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040113963,0.00071362325,0.0009687639,0.003080166,0.05284171,0.01092347,0.004457133,0.020473048,0.015643017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016759492,0.0013146532,0.0009306596,0.005855129,0.0044725756,0.0018931058,0.0029393504,0.014044665,0.0014353598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039932082,0.0003579084,0.036359243,0.0003084351,0.00021857354,0.006960968,0.034904364,0.0008515525,0.001558025,0.09934231,0.8019813,0.016758034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039250933,0.00012563137,0.1602057,0.0011054617,0.00048604404,0.0007776315,0.095022246,0.0022553816,0.0017565198,0.010214295,0.72710985,0.00054872583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14517364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14517364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20242247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99147743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399060758","doi":"10.29173/mlj1050","title":"Employment Standards that Work for Women","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Gender equality; Political science; Public administration; Not for profit; Government (linguistics); Voluntary association; Equal employment opportunity; Work (physics); Public relations; Law; Sociology; Gender studies; Commission; Engineering","score_opus":0.06720477419209601,"score_gpt":0.3223767747043042,"score_spread":0.2551720005122082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399060758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020695793,0.003909745,0.0019216645,0.08487215,0.0017311341,0.000096059484,0.00019902337,0.000087879955,0.8864866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54179853,0.003406226,0.0032489465,0.033286206,0.0010156013,0.00031071116,0.0003197687,0.00014019717,0.41647393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941303,0.0013265475,0.00021667792,0.00036014948,0.002338724,0.0016276313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947701,0.0006444237,0.00043257777,0.0005658072,0.0017694794,0.0018174476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005586568,0.00029041243,0.00022972935,0.0010267816,0.009083737,0.0056765815,0.0010446676,0.0026730455,0.018540327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010868002,0.00019270426,0.00031308617,0.0009293389,0.0051765074,0.0017631197,0.0053599216,0.0027164512,0.005850091],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024594292,0.00014167839,0.01497579,0.0001541252,0.0000109257635,0.00019343288,0.035682496,0.00015830618,0.0006972039,0.58852994,0.1997516,0.15967995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000106341295,0.000043390406,0.017590145,0.000507221,0.000005587463,0.00013415141,0.014963875,0.00004574382,0.00023994694,0.03539404,0.931046,0.000019270985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048833776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11025703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9511662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005412986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021452311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097099066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399060776","doi":"10.29173/mlj1056","title":"Response to Consutation Paper on Franchise Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Franchise; Legislation; State (computer science); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Marketing; Computer science","score_opus":0.027645803910842974,"score_gpt":0.31189943137143306,"score_spread":0.2842536274605901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399060776","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026497382,0.000659852,0.00022777791,0.9699276,0.017374525,0.000030291478,0.00020275069,0.00005667332,0.00887076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015186111,0.00039156512,0.0001363773,0.9540941,0.0044852193,0.00005924358,0.00006614307,0.000036704998,0.02554452],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99522805,0.001422246,0.0002745683,0.00064796297,0.0011821904,0.0012451013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842227,0.009609433,0.0006457937,0.00038084463,0.0037255068,0.001415656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061472035,0.00082692044,0.0010652472,0.00072128745,0.011001709,0.0040918067,0.0031249882,0.044470016,0.01015143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022751648,0.0008218634,0.0009092011,0.0011360548,0.0036612863,0.0026397791,0.002831762,0.028977638,0.0026540894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003214394,0.000016145088,0.00047840513,0.000044660013,0.000004208357,0.00040524965,0.0011493528,0.00006625119,0.00016305728,0.0122365,0.9832615,0.0021425236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031420135,0.0000589508,0.0024291656,0.00017861648,0.000010844382,0.00022860497,0.0034350238,0.00025725382,0.00036994685,0.0031331237,0.9898065,0.000060665927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07642554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09151359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92357445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009757505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016993033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15196139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399060778","doi":"10.29173/mlj750","title":"A Judicial Loudmouth with a Quite Legacy: A Review of Emett Hall: Establishment Radical","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Legislature; Suspect; Political science; Economic Justice; Portrait; Sociology; History; Art history","score_opus":0.07047549840749247,"score_gpt":0.35105315399381504,"score_spread":0.2805776555863226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399060778","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006577461,0.9910451,0.000035383906,0.0063925376,0.0012312812,0.0000034251082,0.000009089254,0.000002536649,0.0012148756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017787185,0.9849481,0.00015560193,0.009005622,0.0012854732,0.000014063261,0.000022033904,0.0000052468044,0.0027850585],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984794,0.0005652175,0.000119263335,0.00015083043,0.00059839146,0.0000869087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708986,0.0013078691,0.00026065728,0.00006321534,0.0010524407,0.00022591723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025271368,0.00056611386,0.0010360838,0.004565914,0.0016075615,0.00361652,0.0011158208,0.002661786,0.0037248693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070053707,0.00054246566,0.00037610327,0.009290954,0.00240084,0.003997963,0.0013708149,0.003510686,0.0015601128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000284141,0.000033690878,0.00023989643,0.0075118653,0.000033791013,0.00012803485,0.0007973725,0.00007796442,0.00015253211,0.010982762,0.75176424,0.22824942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048421193,0.000016114727,0.0006978273,0.006227294,0.000017568222,0.00014626056,0.00043225737,0.000010999199,0.000030776315,0.0007091019,0.99169886,0.00000816513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020566447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.065534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97943354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038705748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012742807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040893435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399069657","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102517","title":"Patient and Family Experiences of Adverse Events in Pregnancy in Canada from a Multicultural Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Multiculturalism; Pregnancy; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine; Gender studies; Pedagogy; Art","score_opus":0.013560285059921854,"score_gpt":0.25469136028452277,"score_spread":0.24113107522460092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399069657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863694,0.0009635343,0.000031411488,0.004732444,0.00004617987,0.000023428925,0.00014427172,0.0000029664948,0.00768634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99783796,0.0007773537,0.000055613298,0.00071104243,0.000011428602,0.000007704323,0.000046160956,0.0000032983412,0.0005494854],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975988,0.0007835287,0.00010547841,0.00010015518,0.00045958077,0.00095233385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903352,0.0011844882,0.0012490334,0.00008742285,0.0018248475,0.0053190184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013955223,0.00020083328,0.0004506776,0.0012285367,0.015925301,0.0036994538,0.0010869612,0.00084590167,0.0029607294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007189522,0.00034295864,0.0003714237,0.0030579942,0.003275432,0.0010379659,0.0037815736,0.0026370035,0.000112327245],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023537349,0.00037737863,0.47516727,0.0001325176,0.000073337505,0.003606564,0.49591944,0.00020619223,0.00027263578,0.0025005548,0.0055948645,0.015913878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014839147,0.000093823866,0.27653164,0.00024971867,0.000032159354,0.0010346608,0.7151433,0.00013587829,0.000057876623,0.00027296008,0.0063673463,0.00006577836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9587168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98101866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04128319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035737257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06493673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2592932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399083526","doi":"10.7202/1111264ar","title":"Réformer la dévolution légale des successions au Québec : de l’Office de révision du Code civil au Code civil du Québec, musicalités et rythmes entourant le statut du conjoint survivant dans la famille","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Humanities; Political science; Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.024788664153555223,"score_gpt":0.28029545585213306,"score_spread":0.2555067916985778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399083526","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23706111,0.047921922,0.0043251417,0.45009375,0.0025094836,0.0002257224,0.0010902815,0.00008500443,0.25668752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8559537,0.009917788,0.0022517708,0.022087127,0.000278301,0.00007846076,0.00027049542,0.00003841347,0.10912408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952695,0.0009573552,0.000118924945,0.00034300087,0.0014324887,0.0018786895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910251,0.001321054,0.0005632188,0.0002190957,0.0042299456,0.0026416217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00594859,0.00026719633,0.00031245523,0.0013119427,0.010240605,0.004355644,0.0015430789,0.0031578029,0.008564665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012203762,0.00028780932,0.00028963902,0.0018656824,0.006943335,0.002394176,0.0025685448,0.0036121758,0.00044348298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013165404,0.0001464437,0.040773015,0.0004831166,0.00006279656,0.0008025352,0.048271224,0.0012875296,0.00142565,0.4507269,0.27542043,0.1804687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062561085,0.00006640441,0.13339141,0.0013588641,0.00005317142,0.00018328447,0.03437192,0.0008372809,0.0006361429,0.010346846,0.8185569,0.00013525019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99114746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99592966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09868663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09868663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23588374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.716025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399415660","doi":"10.1515/9782760644779-016","title":"Droit Des Autochtones Et Droit Autochtone Devant Les Cours Fédérales Du Canada","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.021369177132150124,"score_gpt":0.2216437871096699,"score_spread":0.20027460997751978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399415660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4000383,0.014821106,0.0009372547,0.018038547,0.0005236469,0.000047472106,0.0013310491,0.00007303536,0.56418955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5071071,0.0041906233,0.00026716327,0.00090924004,0.000044903496,0.000016338334,0.00018472834,0.000044324694,0.48723558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988727,0.00007433375,0.000015628973,0.00009262047,0.00038041265,0.00056424213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998917,0.00019236491,0.00007110942,0.00002814298,0.00040763442,0.000383801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047239423,0.00026945295,0.00026499573,0.00088194595,0.011484176,0.0050450214,0.000652029,0.0011787422,0.014472405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017506834,0.00034162222,0.00021233657,0.0016623867,0.0024927966,0.000991077,0.0010434218,0.0024623745,0.00062539376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018937355,0.00011149399,0.04043408,0.0001545874,0.00004505254,0.002004349,0.087920986,0.0016455883,0.0015371366,0.596756,0.13703817,0.13216317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012147752,0.000020863863,0.09115806,0.00024814674,0.000021184012,0.00030876356,0.028272454,0.00048148155,0.0005547979,0.0039734086,0.87489027,0.000058546855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99833846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06540769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06540769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08757161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47456825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399444066","doi":"10.1080/02697459.2024.2359790","title":"Human rights and municipal land use bylaws in Atlantic Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Practice and Research","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Human rights; Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Political science; Geography; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.1672113683953822,"score_gpt":0.47543456110765453,"score_spread":0.30822319271227233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399444066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88868266,0.0022145647,0.00083438423,0.012954181,0.00007056495,0.00014053767,0.000736516,0.000018503186,0.0943481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99353987,0.0006381572,0.00035442895,0.00045492768,0.0000061199553,0.000027708415,0.000113963564,0.000007959661,0.0048568444],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928597,0.001260359,0.00018857664,0.0005627124,0.002134091,0.0029946142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98365915,0.005007548,0.0021792906,0.000630675,0.0058991993,0.00262414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005535653,0.000201834,0.00048655117,0.0024073687,0.017912462,0.007850349,0.0019832728,0.0008803529,0.004146114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017422482,0.00029809057,0.00029315168,0.007449173,0.009907003,0.0017529,0.0041824766,0.0023166244,0.0001136889],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011977128,0.00017080759,0.31159198,0.00037566543,0.00011802667,0.00072848256,0.30932626,0.0023360807,0.0005845559,0.26381525,0.022261163,0.08857202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023588458,0.000037702008,0.38722333,0.0006410256,0.000092921924,0.000082266735,0.47985086,0.0019342919,0.00047735657,0.010609553,0.11890449,0.00012260712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9982627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18638773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18638773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25889093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9436749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399809261","doi":"10.12677/ojls.2024.126519","title":"The Peculiarities of the National Legal Localization of American Law in the Common Law System—Canada and Australia Were Used as the Comparison Objects","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Journal of Legal Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Common law","score_opus":0.047508846635932,"score_gpt":0.37237958404165916,"score_spread":0.32487073740572714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399809261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9687409,0.00012501908,0.0007692135,0.00010764796,0.000008186634,0.00008217519,0.00041240975,0.000008243355,0.029746173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975043,0.000058977195,0.0005747015,0.000021585112,0.0000020671564,0.00005715039,0.0001728375,0.0000052505425,0.0016031151],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976138,0.0007512425,0.00016224493,0.00025826867,0.0006107401,0.0006036829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99563676,0.0010012239,0.00076995295,0.0002958519,0.0019000663,0.00039612394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016020813,0.00013504516,0.00025073026,0.0056831497,0.0032590213,0.0020328783,0.00047005646,0.00024711245,0.0035425762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006721569,0.00011343171,0.00016114119,0.010436947,0.0033103484,0.0008838081,0.0018636032,0.0005386596,0.00016111691],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021366119,0.00018408491,0.7305144,0.00021815159,0.000098374025,0.0006252896,0.107517876,0.00075414445,0.0032298637,0.1021475,0.002172086,0.052324597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053132317,0.000038679827,0.9406836,0.000048317655,0.000035515768,0.00020391868,0.045471042,0.0006557988,0.00068759744,0.0027852093,0.009364756,0.000020221998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6985172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83974504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3014828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008574988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00996379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6065166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399819432","doi":"10.1515/9782760540675","title":"Labrador","year":2014,"lang":"pt","type":"book","venue":"Presses de l'Université du Québec eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.01603010991369282,"score_gpt":0.2235764004317361,"score_spread":0.20754629051804327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399819432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008283933,0.0027638958,0.00049284194,0.002449867,0.0014359786,0.000047209007,0.0020498768,0.0007164492,0.98921555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019080988,0.0008986648,0.00021214163,0.00039207225,0.00008369493,0.000014223085,0.00053529703,0.00023015834,0.99572563],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992267,0.000063706335,0.000025738778,0.00021761058,0.00032854552,0.00013776339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913377,0.000058070895,0.00003669156,0.000125146,0.00045614352,0.0001901879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040656613,0.0011186476,0.0006578665,0.0015949643,0.0041269697,0.006867465,0.0013405719,0.0017787175,0.72724754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014219189,0.00048414845,0.0004895684,0.001964668,0.0009396623,0.003123874,0.0030037416,0.002331615,0.51512563],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006576873,0.000027335602,0.0003937613,0.00018334668,0.000005819986,0.00025166903,0.0003547935,0.00007542062,0.000540123,0.014090246,0.8906763,0.09333532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021641636,0.0000035976104,0.00023714485,0.000046519057,0.0000011079619,0.000054104665,0.00012523655,0.000012685274,0.00007778383,0.00025065293,0.9991855,0.0000035178598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074111186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17332296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92588884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004734371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004000848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399819489","doi":"10.1515/9782760540675-002","title":"Labrador","year":2014,"lang":"pt","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses de l'Université du Québec eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.018921320294744536,"score_gpt":0.22081383652685088,"score_spread":0.20189251623210636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399819489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007863806,0.0028882585,0.0007172204,0.0008670207,0.00053636695,0.00004493538,0.0012105952,0.00063637964,0.99231285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015355444,0.00058405654,0.00028617453,0.00014953293,0.000038774815,0.000013408322,0.00031767145,0.00015993278,0.996915],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922395,0.00007577186,0.000028851617,0.00022970432,0.0003028459,0.00013890032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927217,0.00010483102,0.000042497217,0.00014722973,0.00027063632,0.00016262021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005168414,0.0015063924,0.0007517428,0.002993448,0.0028061871,0.0055135577,0.0015065573,0.0016257539,0.8001145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014893331,0.00057846186,0.000572156,0.0026438183,0.00071804755,0.0023326809,0.0024367662,0.0014775728,0.6239791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014485473,0.00008736113,0.0005741751,0.00031827026,0.000015122854,0.0003049171,0.0002567816,0.0002581437,0.0011417398,0.028785,0.5219399,0.44617385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008586354,0.000009863662,0.00033381468,0.00006734916,0.000004027822,0.00008546213,0.00008054076,0.000055620185,0.00021997327,0.000991571,0.99813855,0.0000046652845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019013606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047312744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9809864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021559484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002403029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399821061","doi":"10.1515/9782760524637-006","title":"Le Droit à La Parentalité Au Québec","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses de l'Université du Québec eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.01575203393165197,"score_gpt":0.21601567223749202,"score_spread":0.20026363830584004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399821061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.097935714,0.06636536,0.0011723343,0.05959591,0.0018567917,0.00004742799,0.0008584804,0.0000975006,0.7720705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38962397,0.020068914,0.0007041707,0.004036552,0.0001728475,0.00003184907,0.000231234,0.00007269649,0.5850578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992544,0.00014724424,0.00001720684,0.00007616707,0.00022253815,0.00028244147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992331,0.0001338969,0.000047624315,0.000030209765,0.00035382126,0.00020138451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006607251,0.00030112005,0.00024806874,0.0009169731,0.008913186,0.0035112214,0.0007322082,0.0010868618,0.019490471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015808601,0.00023838233,0.00022503217,0.0019420701,0.0023781657,0.0007522344,0.0010057694,0.0025341578,0.0008487267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071696784,0.00007778969,0.01704684,0.00018096254,0.00004041287,0.0013974123,0.031778593,0.0007496495,0.0007528315,0.4379261,0.26687714,0.24310052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000087991675,0.0000149246125,0.026975285,0.00034003967,0.000013052373,0.00019387492,0.0080363555,0.0001684885,0.00015435755,0.002263845,0.96180946,0.00002147749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9911011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04670852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04670852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05638938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33889568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399841707","doi":"10.1515/9782763715315-007","title":"La reconnaissance de l’adoption coutumière au Québec : quelle place pour la <i>Charte des droits et libertés de la personne ?</i>","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.031630045432253936,"score_gpt":0.2918075767958746,"score_spread":0.26017753136362065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399841707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15725632,0.018872498,0.0047497177,0.12269511,0.001957712,0.00016171686,0.00088973506,0.00015757707,0.6932596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5623073,0.004468819,0.0017593716,0.007616172,0.00011805493,0.00006397842,0.00019618738,0.00007853796,0.42339167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968802,0.00056643336,0.00007173468,0.00027566822,0.0011498621,0.0010561106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968616,0.00061420474,0.0001756573,0.00020799253,0.0016400606,0.00050050794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023062495,0.00024823457,0.00026834925,0.0007532728,0.011223174,0.0047378032,0.0010581304,0.0020692872,0.011028644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041150167,0.00029473365,0.0003121292,0.0019192758,0.0072777453,0.0017404543,0.0012621298,0.004443983,0.00068725715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006738438,0.000054294305,0.012875939,0.0001630793,0.000023447894,0.0011069217,0.11441277,0.0005691701,0.0014010894,0.51444453,0.21962857,0.1352528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012334702,0.000036680703,0.04810817,0.00030947544,0.000013033486,0.00025230783,0.024760222,0.000339539,0.00059537607,0.0057330932,0.9197535,0.00008629841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9908563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06507883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06507883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09604488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4721822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399843344","doi":"10.1515/9782763715407-004","title":"The Ethos of Canadian Aboriginal Law and the Potential Relevance of Federal Loyalty in a Reconfigured Relationship between Aboriginal and Non-Aboriginal Governments: A Thought Experiment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Loyalty; Relevance (law); Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.021631672330855216,"score_gpt":0.3090466728070566,"score_spread":0.2874150004762014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399843344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68499345,0.0010753005,0.003942321,0.023118338,0.00027429644,0.0017329844,0.00016702384,0.000021478389,0.2846748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893573,0.0002557592,0.0021447777,0.0016679416,0.00001963267,0.0005651428,0.000021978993,0.000011773038,0.005955794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98061556,0.012763925,0.00021683137,0.0010829107,0.0034208973,0.0018998098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819665,0.01375893,0.00066369324,0.0009637345,0.0017324439,0.0009146323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02409202,0.00033394096,0.00043240678,0.00092634064,0.024376586,0.011869497,0.0025961476,0.003349282,0.0048511564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021804139,0.00032197052,0.00037883577,0.001968525,0.046171755,0.004422002,0.0043451847,0.004913219,0.00016829949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019788455,0.00042788318,0.0036294134,0.00021892693,0.00001660282,0.00028612756,0.46421063,0.00048197102,0.0009853276,0.5069753,0.0056614107,0.016908577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049488887,0.00058205146,0.022248704,0.00059618783,0.00012198124,0.00014340687,0.7404114,0.0018445452,0.001509996,0.10715944,0.12470928,0.00017802548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7346679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8411567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9171339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.082866095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.095947914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6012384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400074267","doi":"10.1515/9781773855714-073","title":"8.2 The Durability of Terra Nullius: Tsilhqot’in v. British Columbia","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Durability; Materials science; Composite material","score_opus":0.022846628090494245,"score_gpt":0.22727782034271493,"score_spread":0.20443119225222067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400074267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023883687,0.0032560613,0.00049687165,0.014028025,0.00031387815,0.00003103665,0.00014214622,0.000030396028,0.95781785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4119245,0.0015013628,0.00033710746,0.007437184,0.000073023315,0.000045615398,0.00008320816,0.000072007904,0.57852596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988238,0.000165931,0.000028993945,0.00010877039,0.00032796233,0.00054446433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993641,0.00017509834,0.000029418898,0.00004200365,0.00030145212,0.00008795602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008783428,0.00031561407,0.00027452977,0.00092891796,0.016726617,0.007018991,0.0011894618,0.004163446,0.019524893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002011997,0.00033816893,0.00022118154,0.0012484132,0.007725165,0.0023361037,0.002242709,0.005639079,0.0023651966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039808794,0.00001365734,0.0022471913,0.00008691624,0.0000064656456,0.00092728215,0.0491133,0.000088118926,0.00043705298,0.77755654,0.14159997,0.027883727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000836618,0.000010687003,0.0044289473,0.00035681078,0.000015514805,0.00028458354,0.02070681,0.00014248767,0.0005276005,0.021793945,0.9516816,0.000042745687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8604696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.951966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13953042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023078958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019828549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28070426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400314019","doi":"10.7202/1111656ar","title":"Observations concernant l’application de l’article 1460 du Code civil du Québec et la responsabilité du gardien non titulaire de l’autorité parentale","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013956287667254019,"score_gpt":0.24835959753690598,"score_spread":0.23440330986965197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400314019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77147144,0.0029141174,0.0013123088,0.037211463,0.00087663595,0.00033034114,0.0036715337,0.000052034746,0.18216014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80243874,0.0019282436,0.0009940658,0.005945563,0.00015539887,0.00016733159,0.0009354276,0.000056241708,0.18737891],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962327,0.00069636415,0.00014529865,0.0003092635,0.001984789,0.0006315911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867079,0.0033659618,0.0011618156,0.00044573357,0.007340513,0.0009780838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032119728,0.00023323434,0.00018906532,0.0014659809,0.008238911,0.0016944314,0.00090236455,0.0015050819,0.008979071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013442033,0.00028790702,0.00022092777,0.0023220994,0.0027115585,0.0006810984,0.0014485602,0.0031793308,0.000812727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027720304,0.00023726026,0.13834953,0.00043301802,0.000055237706,0.0036229573,0.46094647,0.00042838627,0.00920751,0.028336154,0.2622583,0.09584809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000133633275,0.000064901746,0.41068318,0.00023588372,0.0000197709,0.0002590419,0.11552299,0.00023792751,0.002424524,0.000853436,0.46958783,0.00009710348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96527815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98258406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96527815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029380769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027697887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21317339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400314327","doi":"10.7202/1111681ar","title":"L’invisibilité persistante des parents de même sexe en droit familial québécois","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017611992315633616,"score_gpt":0.24383469373824862,"score_spread":0.226222701422615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400314327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9556128,0.0075588305,0.00018173778,0.018973831,0.00016943864,0.000017914497,0.0005250925,0.000005712738,0.01695464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874973,0.0028782734,0.00011361189,0.0013391445,0.00004505802,0.000019003479,0.00017823785,0.000006083512,0.007923287],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978694,0.0005305193,0.000071546514,0.00025129097,0.00044769014,0.00082954345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935377,0.0014237708,0.0013546378,0.00027421126,0.001922614,0.0014871168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025092224,0.00017298227,0.0003124412,0.0010344125,0.005788341,0.0020470123,0.0009129142,0.0012042617,0.01183413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009870512,0.00024127627,0.00031603893,0.0013786684,0.0027740994,0.0013043551,0.0015652097,0.0018968432,0.0003990411],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002653618,0.00011083288,0.70566547,0.00026459663,0.00010959786,0.0022864635,0.1744514,0.00014108497,0.00087680167,0.0116678765,0.017889654,0.08627088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001538673,0.00009047941,0.79391015,0.0006638486,0.00006738842,0.0010735913,0.16026202,0.000109546316,0.00034259824,0.0009935935,0.04242044,0.000050879866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.903792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94212514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.903792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01449148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017747942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1935491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401019447","doi":"10.29173/alr2776","title":"Unsettling the Royal Proclamation of 1763: A Substantive Analysis of Section 25 of the Charter","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proclamation; Charter; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Section (typography); Bill of rights; Human rights; Legislative history; Sociology","score_opus":0.024977973868769706,"score_gpt":0.31865952613543785,"score_spread":0.29368155226666814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401019447","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17978145,0.020347657,0.0074387053,0.057890937,0.000658477,0.00036065961,0.00068648264,0.00009176819,0.73274386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9408824,0.0040160697,0.0021069979,0.011025565,0.00017081719,0.00010783482,0.000107198284,0.000044304477,0.041538857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.987565,0.0023070737,0.00026816264,0.0011352955,0.005511662,0.00321286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896116,0.005684552,0.0006822835,0.00045730243,0.0030936126,0.00047064404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013029961,0.00041232872,0.00038258248,0.0024499286,0.01669948,0.010560464,0.002886928,0.004648021,0.0022145628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014758599,0.00044678955,0.00056578644,0.0030416835,0.033999205,0.002244388,0.0025137018,0.006920534,0.00020735236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000097087195,0.0000074229283,0.0007663735,0.00004676083,0.000006429801,0.00022860034,0.02201979,0.00035143647,0.00025286188,0.96222925,0.009671406,0.004409799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038893606,0.000059649632,0.026587173,0.0011217154,0.00010621109,0.00025707434,0.050671425,0.0014021035,0.0020215856,0.13019665,0.7872747,0.0002627747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9642496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9702285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11625117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11625117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17279933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8434652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401019576","doi":"10.29173/alr2783","title":"Beyond Charter Applicability: Exploring Challenges and Opportunities for Indigenous Jurisdiction in McCarthy v. Whitefish Lake First Nation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Indigenous; Jurisdiction; Doctrine; Context (archaeology); Law; Constitution; Political science; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16413033029585053,"score_gpt":0.3194346708031673,"score_spread":0.15530434050731676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401019576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18423943,0.030158477,0.0020580448,0.23171525,0.000631308,0.00017778855,0.00011440738,0.00003852247,0.5508668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9182035,0.00748332,0.0008981773,0.03242033,0.00028770315,0.000117981064,0.000047721333,0.000022691389,0.04051852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98298013,0.006673019,0.00040835774,0.00094722357,0.004120752,0.004870477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869664,0.008669839,0.00060649693,0.0003870094,0.0024376903,0.0009325668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01938229,0.0002636965,0.00065407046,0.0021713204,0.017975366,0.012985633,0.004836896,0.010497751,0.003230509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019825036,0.00050024595,0.00079609355,0.0026053998,0.0267624,0.0064023677,0.0059337267,0.009820392,0.00020361482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021717375,0.000033759323,0.0022807624,0.00021678547,0.000019456324,0.0013934039,0.059338346,0.00047566323,0.0003124868,0.9067508,0.016295375,0.012861422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010436057,0.00014843963,0.02851416,0.0024714768,0.00019469697,0.0006344865,0.21343975,0.00131617,0.00086121215,0.20050211,0.55155206,0.00026102026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84436387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9361738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15563613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050901245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.094572075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36931616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401446120","doi":"10.1515/9782763742014-007","title":"Refonder le « mariage de raison » canadien sur de nouvelles assises","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.05128251277394161,"score_gpt":0.28706866382906043,"score_spread":0.23578615105511883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401446120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009570981,0.028243395,0.0032409711,0.08386751,0.0057409084,0.000025060457,0.00006963157,0.00010412135,0.86913735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25362244,0.01134178,0.0022662163,0.017856548,0.0030673794,0.000083311614,0.000058190566,0.00028218838,0.711422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535745,0.0022502006,0.000114930204,0.00056491134,0.0010045258,0.00070788176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772197,0.0012814001,0.00014495378,0.0003123954,0.00032892352,0.00021021132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004073485,0.00090287713,0.0006956115,0.0015462119,0.014093067,0.008780823,0.0013117247,0.007839738,0.019943528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008572033,0.00049481896,0.0005774127,0.0012065172,0.022638625,0.007112082,0.006139343,0.014534056,0.004927897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010621958,0.0000075260637,0.00007662089,0.00003258161,0.0000040421464,0.00012491332,0.0147910295,0.00005018843,0.00007606363,0.9463548,0.029126892,0.009344813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004875296,0.000008156117,0.00019987616,0.00014809884,0.0000042712363,0.00023218723,0.0032566462,0.000046389418,0.00009071612,0.049778502,0.9462161,0.000014139017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051665626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06527132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9483344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009706368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010187471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1027298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401446789","doi":"10.3138/9781487553920-014","title":"10 Internal and External Advocacy for Legal Reform: The Genesis of the 1986 Ontario Family Law Act, 1967–1986","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03829873180557894,"score_gpt":0.24699866610000634,"score_spread":0.2086999342944274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401446789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04923029,0.018769007,0.0013004445,0.10622518,0.0014586515,0.00023048931,0.0010207919,0.000046811736,0.8217183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29488435,0.0063883765,0.0011911356,0.009517846,0.00027549113,0.00021781924,0.00020036635,0.00006683953,0.6872576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969351,0.0005893941,0.00011465812,0.00027550125,0.0009576496,0.0011275888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970861,0.00077024143,0.0002644678,0.00010971575,0.0011758234,0.00059366383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028721346,0.0004168633,0.00024913845,0.0017583701,0.01902633,0.005896164,0.0012517453,0.005987259,0.011506527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007819902,0.00067779404,0.00030060002,0.0030103663,0.013341615,0.0027028196,0.0031927486,0.0046550436,0.0009587447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024519277,0.00002337215,0.0027731145,0.00008088472,0.0000037657908,0.00023537484,0.056459736,0.00019104731,0.00015281612,0.7597389,0.16697845,0.0133380275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012759434,0.000006929719,0.015093492,0.0002864666,0.00000846149,0.000057576555,0.012725998,0.00013132092,0.00015204625,0.008133973,0.96336204,0.000028890769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9846698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16197105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16197105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1627084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9719948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401446973","doi":"10.3138/9781487553920","title":"Essays in the History of Canadian Law, Volume XII","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Law; History; Political science; Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.04160662951370592,"score_gpt":0.23001639828648485,"score_spread":0.18840976877277893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401446973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028362954,0.08494034,0.0005770395,0.024067264,0.0039726556,0.0000616595,0.000583207,0.0000817958,0.8828798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05921979,0.061699294,0.0011819167,0.005467137,0.00086100044,0.00007886789,0.00055957586,0.00013437826,0.870798],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986725,0.00012965048,0.000024872197,0.00011255734,0.0007863853,0.0002741151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901676,0.00020786076,0.000028824928,0.000045302677,0.0005404283,0.00016080152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008308067,0.0008818364,0.00043903006,0.0051716254,0.01790867,0.009275735,0.001587618,0.001765151,0.029166616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030598931,0.00037451094,0.00030626555,0.009401858,0.010448867,0.0028196455,0.0015815994,0.0021988563,0.002805247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000095418745,0.000014758491,0.00031438516,0.00017746042,0.000003290208,0.0001628827,0.01150374,0.0001643369,0.000120816614,0.2749898,0.6672968,0.04524215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.20856e-7,9.754519e-7,0.0006173627,0.00016208373,0.0000013111277,0.000029835523,0.0022943288,0.000027144937,0.000023142184,0.0045040976,0.9923339,0.000004924296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95595026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9811747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11107473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11107473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.078546315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80590737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401573126","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4894230","title":"From Carter v Canada (SCC) to Bill C-14: An Appraisal of Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada and 'Charter Dialogue'.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Hearsay; Public administration","score_opus":0.01227326255983955,"score_gpt":0.2910282260577102,"score_spread":0.27875496349787066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401573126","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07615539,0.024156332,0.00026900155,0.7349716,0.0022982978,0.0001763902,0.0004701994,0.0000313021,0.16147147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6713171,0.009750884,0.00036783295,0.2876225,0.0005937669,0.00015962163,0.00018016262,0.00005227658,0.02995568],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9790964,0.0039099306,0.00046280405,0.00069730735,0.0061598932,0.009673716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96815836,0.012461647,0.0013128149,0.0003689925,0.009591003,0.008107244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010894227,0.0005003962,0.00066008593,0.002136942,0.046614997,0.013251374,0.005797632,0.019636098,0.0070009404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047428846,0.00052806374,0.000779888,0.004296823,0.020611621,0.0040425905,0.007061666,0.023652041,0.00032707717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017902942,0.00009144172,0.009433758,0.0006214308,0.00005850852,0.0018402004,0.11966533,0.00056519144,0.00018526921,0.32008463,0.5149218,0.03235349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014399832,0.00008965359,0.067307845,0.0039383154,0.00020991122,0.0004469758,0.31469753,0.00053276157,0.00042013684,0.025065366,0.5868435,0.00030397324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9937085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18472685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18472685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.49500144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9456013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401652260","doi":"10.1515/9782763752518-008","title":"La pensée contractuelle dans l’interprétation de la Constitution canadienne","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.024085317419286524,"score_gpt":0.28036577489772524,"score_spread":0.2562804574784387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401652260","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006437039,0.006035084,0.009911251,0.024815269,0.0007992061,0.000026521844,0.0000681352,0.000044196564,0.9518632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61869574,0.006034927,0.00899542,0.007888,0.0015126455,0.00031413243,0.00014574117,0.00039146308,0.35602194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992413,0.004462575,0.00014886746,0.0006468213,0.0013496767,0.0009791928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99660337,0.0023311325,0.000117929754,0.00044008147,0.0003971208,0.00011029372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065656984,0.0009457957,0.0008475452,0.002732717,0.010602404,0.014141541,0.001966695,0.007935268,0.015296713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008127484,0.00079176656,0.0006271471,0.0039401148,0.03548295,0.010586414,0.0037800292,0.0138094695,0.0018055908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.842021e-7,0.0000012892802,0.000005654787,0.000002603156,5.510774e-7,0.000010958755,0.0011574688,0.000017619204,0.000006438942,0.99695075,0.0012162353,0.00062940625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001255351,0.0000061637247,0.00019100484,0.00012734119,0.0000058339724,0.000092145725,0.0022735156,0.00028286898,0.00011955378,0.67199653,0.32487383,0.00001870248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12158362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.097213365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87841636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022190487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012832759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24175185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401703770","doi":"10.4324/9781003433408-10","title":"First Nations peoples and the law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.028904871997786297,"score_gpt":0.2882093895830475,"score_spread":0.2593045175852612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401703770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002055217,0.013629287,0.00021950324,0.007931404,0.0005733131,0.000008125389,0.000018381164,0.000011357067,0.9755534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1876338,0.015730126,0.0006714868,0.008085623,0.0010579608,0.00008275296,0.00005763984,0.00005873965,0.7866219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913955,0.00043731395,0.000014276423,0.000061887695,0.00016414405,0.00018284106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993513,0.00039994786,0.00003794571,0.00005561134,0.00007033835,0.00008478843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001156007,0.00041759433,0.00029200522,0.0011170199,0.0076775053,0.008125738,0.00062914577,0.0038148237,0.020384291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020827944,0.00021556452,0.00017276485,0.0016439798,0.010102406,0.004407608,0.0018820085,0.0046904674,0.0016054361],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001308884,0.000008225398,0.000048326707,0.000010178208,4.741273e-7,0.000021987593,0.0017373251,0.000018351113,0.000008922252,0.968478,0.024902381,0.0047646086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037148643,0.000006456639,0.00054737926,0.00026838717,0.0000022024017,0.000099718825,0.004678406,0.00008375349,0.00006349484,0.2767172,0.71752155,0.000007780807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032247383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056432378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96775264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004639921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005229546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06819224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401714076","doi":"","title":"Universalisme et décolonisation dans le discours juridique de la Cour suprême du Canada","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Colonisation; Art; Humanities; History; Archaeology; Colonization","score_opus":0.010807595012458834,"score_gpt":0.2523854144510876,"score_spread":0.24157781943862874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401714076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79864883,0.0042468547,0.0016784052,0.044258207,0.00030721296,0.00007317456,0.00026145607,0.000048990274,0.15047686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669317,0.0004679779,0.00019261647,0.0013847558,0.000029113759,0.000018275183,0.000025965111,0.000023551309,0.030926086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918317,0.0010102923,0.00018885917,0.00078154705,0.0018101722,0.004377477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901023,0.0031205274,0.0007149875,0.0003885819,0.003555588,0.0021179172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058729313,0.00031506302,0.001010997,0.0015620504,0.038266473,0.009719348,0.0022203298,0.0031171371,0.008891507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014077453,0.00056970475,0.00039024636,0.002710299,0.02264323,0.0020755513,0.005603829,0.010156644,0.00028760196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097994554,0.000066283545,0.03022746,0.00013674451,0.00005245471,0.0006634881,0.21000692,0.0008169349,0.0007418901,0.71134806,0.017351072,0.028490772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102030455,0.0000980714,0.16289751,0.0007235285,0.00012772296,0.00046294276,0.26583946,0.0014780695,0.0016897172,0.057040043,0.50919753,0.00034329435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.986717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9933936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8898013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11019869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1975997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7995512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401881235","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4916200","title":"Under the IRPA and after Irving: The Right to Standing before the Federal Court for Canadian Children Seeking&amp;nbsp; to Challenge Their Parents' Deportations&amp;nbsp;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Federal election; Law; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.02091156208835149,"score_gpt":0.3016507239482298,"score_spread":0.2807391618598783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401881235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02074661,0.0029511598,0.0007798812,0.2285755,0.001794976,0.00018628883,0.0008799977,0.00013478391,0.74395084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26144108,0.0015021535,0.0021621482,0.11297124,0.0003564506,0.0002469172,0.0002719103,0.0002618608,0.62078625],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834711,0.0021297457,0.00039321693,0.0010493677,0.00435055,0.008606074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98690516,0.003264503,0.00035806105,0.00060653104,0.0052388767,0.003626897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008529398,0.0005655864,0.0007899563,0.0011146979,0.052770577,0.01401425,0.0036031115,0.021260887,0.038165152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026161298,0.0012324748,0.0006921429,0.0011824802,0.010304175,0.0052582207,0.0062531093,0.019573858,0.004909441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003250593,0.000053213793,0.002442314,0.00004576549,0.000011455075,0.00053818553,0.01672237,0.000097047654,0.00042686434,0.32148638,0.6415567,0.016587237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029660465,0.000018472378,0.008844657,0.00036619516,0.000039397783,0.00024206884,0.026582109,0.00022785134,0.000556992,0.013501987,0.9494401,0.00015069163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9770148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9921732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0537461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0537461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24806818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38995713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402239354","doi":"10.55302/ispjr22461-2125ah","title":"EUTHANASIA – THE MACEDONIAN VIS-À-VIS THE CANADIAN LEGAL CONCEPT IN LIGHT OF THE POST-COVID ERA: ARE WE REDEFINING THE VALUE OF LIFE?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual of the Institute for Sociological, Political and Juridical Research","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Macedonian; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Value (mathematics); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Political science; Medicine; History; Virology; Ancient history; Internal medicine; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.12079978455500995,"score_gpt":0.4021341286053983,"score_spread":0.2813343440503884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402239354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16433027,0.061020687,0.0034413657,0.14003187,0.0012954372,0.000086605156,0.00043856516,0.000047570764,0.6293076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9367167,0.012357785,0.001690952,0.012390652,0.0002003773,0.000035148787,0.00010929602,0.000027662893,0.036471512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99603695,0.00062131835,0.00009293278,0.00039887015,0.001682334,0.0011675674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977633,0.00048728407,0.00019704661,0.00009573931,0.0010648847,0.00039173983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022331667,0.00029944244,0.00035494016,0.0023635682,0.013400059,0.0069992933,0.0013228732,0.0024864848,0.0037531524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004649336,0.00014955092,0.00036475153,0.003167579,0.021627095,0.0026462374,0.002909863,0.0036494497,0.0002178697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002940231,0.0000136234285,0.0018181938,0.00010384554,0.000008608346,0.00024231615,0.018496722,0.0001261431,0.00041202072,0.9468267,0.012534755,0.019387614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020546673,0.000052754916,0.040450327,0.0009282966,0.00006906776,0.00050893653,0.040855084,0.0006169654,0.000738711,0.047499344,0.8681284,0.00013154706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9752721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9858087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086721346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.086721346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12588456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62921035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402367256","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4948591","title":"Book Review of &lt;i&gt;Search and Seizure&lt;/i&gt; by Robert Diab and Chris Hunt (2025) 47 Manitoba Law Journal (forthcoming)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"History; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01283959765041145,"score_gpt":0.2927812258181518,"score_spread":0.2799416281677404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402367256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045918248,0.37245974,0.0016318284,0.15043117,0.05139938,0.00008018502,0.0019581325,0.00035346343,0.42122698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029395716,0.09543593,0.00053049973,0.016222397,0.011304303,0.00005859552,0.0004861097,0.00020139667,0.87282115],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900204,0.00012989788,0.000040700346,0.00012925973,0.0005983229,0.000099838086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972023,0.00096541864,0.00014260957,0.00013844701,0.0012838155,0.00026737817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012547647,0.0007476228,0.00085969607,0.0041668713,0.0017793161,0.004233567,0.0013002179,0.0036520634,0.10001446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004740421,0.0005335771,0.00041821398,0.005822565,0.0017678728,0.0035231272,0.0010865927,0.0029788609,0.054380346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001995709,0.0000025829938,0.00001765442,0.00004678931,7.049838e-7,0.0000044149524,0.000011290773,0.000026733478,0.000012045367,0.0025034319,0.9765096,0.020862648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013566671,0.0000018931117,0.00010410264,0.000108993496,0.0000012192138,0.000011993453,0.000014595509,0.00002787054,0.0000142329645,0.00083255675,0.99887866,0.0000025133147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06701037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17415595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10001446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007643562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010688976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33458173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403030053","doi":"10.3138/9781487560218-010","title":"8 Hunter v. Southam and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.018618151946142483,"score_gpt":0.21822645852202927,"score_spread":0.1996083065758868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403030053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005191197,0.01647111,0.00038995632,0.0723412,0.00088256,0.000057358768,0.0003286791,0.000027819753,0.90431005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15775478,0.008156735,0.0009290908,0.0372817,0.00035634238,0.000084187435,0.0001263191,0.00006076633,0.79525006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979771,0.00023583203,0.00003268053,0.00013146401,0.00083060074,0.00079232483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986072,0.00040912008,0.000046871843,0.00006325174,0.000649577,0.00022387081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015518987,0.00059138046,0.00037469043,0.0014751591,0.014819356,0.005843212,0.0015232873,0.007318305,0.014326307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039676726,0.0005065577,0.00039607423,0.0020019475,0.01079579,0.002422901,0.0019133723,0.0058189775,0.0012358816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009800866,0.0000051345496,0.00029790215,0.0000302244,0.000001916505,0.00012664584,0.003380469,0.000078865094,0.00006435002,0.73028237,0.2590624,0.0066599064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001199194,0.0000052854807,0.0024500913,0.00025655967,0.00000959539,0.00007501662,0.0032242874,0.00012334804,0.00013289288,0.035384364,0.958296,0.00003067039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97056895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99106836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049032368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049032368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0938964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3557564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403030189","doi":"10.3138/9781487560218-003","title":"1 Laliberté v. The Queen: The First Criminal Case Decided by the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Supreme court; Law; Political science; Criminal case","score_opus":0.026500230348593595,"score_gpt":0.2333392694253535,"score_spread":0.2068390390767599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403030189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013022803,0.03977646,0.0004575617,0.16093105,0.0023076679,0.00013993871,0.0015189892,0.00007582592,0.7817697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17907791,0.01174295,0.00042981768,0.065458566,0.00053042104,0.0000902413,0.00029363786,0.00010142473,0.74227506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676216,0.0002455377,0.000052599153,0.0002453123,0.0011984099,0.0014959188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986657,0.00042542568,0.000052626525,0.00002698034,0.00054716016,0.00028216362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011051759,0.00070391607,0.0006328817,0.0016396983,0.023998294,0.0064213574,0.0023109755,0.012331209,0.017742258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003971985,0.0007646938,0.00043383637,0.0025915424,0.0052279686,0.0017023449,0.0017196719,0.010896015,0.002006416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027506141,0.000015304831,0.0009036222,0.00008391296,0.000007959404,0.00039031098,0.0040850267,0.00018580914,0.00012735314,0.2484582,0.73811454,0.0076004895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022176819,0.0000149384205,0.006604483,0.000517092,0.00003542781,0.00015884732,0.0052549327,0.00036351255,0.00031303856,0.014481211,0.9721568,0.0000776321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98782617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99674726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080440775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.080440775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.112811014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5836414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403206110","doi":"10.7202/1113969ar","title":"Palliser’s Act and the Bermudian–Newfoundland Fishery of 1788","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Newfoundland and Labrador Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fishery; Oceanography; Geography; Biology; Geology","score_opus":0.03290483861172368,"score_gpt":0.30850449728085244,"score_spread":0.2755996586691288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403206110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53067106,0.007488808,0.00025085977,0.03159186,0.0006816972,0.00004442065,0.0008595226,0.000029007519,0.42838287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69821197,0.0017833299,0.0004397379,0.012090215,0.000094600226,0.000047989637,0.0002601897,0.000029756666,0.2870422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838626,0.00013198343,0.000053311684,0.00013359907,0.00022435491,0.0010704875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883443,0.00029881342,0.0002240918,0.000082572216,0.00031057606,0.00024952562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011836963,0.0002111742,0.00029381315,0.0010928154,0.013198201,0.0023929214,0.00087318546,0.002853915,0.0062949704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027242117,0.00034101564,0.00024936753,0.0013474924,0.006255877,0.0013887698,0.002855039,0.004065256,0.0005968061],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004979459,0.00019847896,0.12527812,0.00035052383,0.0001642427,0.007465768,0.17319511,0.0008830162,0.002213709,0.30973387,0.27242547,0.10759374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020576388,0.00004516881,0.2646958,0.00037187533,0.00004357463,0.0007063579,0.042876087,0.0000836528,0.00061737647,0.0023660331,0.68806535,0.00010803788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9457867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9891473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054213285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032730695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024259184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23747897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403373106","doi":"10.1515/9780228022084-018","title":"10 Are Canadian Cities Entrenched in Provincial Constitutions? A Question of Political Constitutionalism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Political science; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.023659294380046724,"score_gpt":0.24747590038635328,"score_spread":0.22381660600630657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403373106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070229545,0.0021408333,0.0013137534,0.052376457,0.00027911545,0.0000543069,0.00074502156,0.00007247783,0.87278855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8920276,0.00089021854,0.0010267737,0.006041124,0.00009436201,0.000047435075,0.00019441704,0.00007072998,0.09960743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99261594,0.000940476,0.00010012924,0.0006716998,0.0016739294,0.0039979587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99544215,0.0010935008,0.00023552394,0.000418334,0.002012422,0.00079805544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033846614,0.00037669283,0.000591019,0.0024145276,0.031909827,0.021367162,0.0026044336,0.0043258425,0.017214876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011847933,0.0007405547,0.00053760246,0.0070757116,0.027218454,0.0053063105,0.003576856,0.0054285754,0.0009025937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016847556,0.000005622415,0.0012269958,0.00001531406,0.0000073146343,0.000036059148,0.0047575613,0.00018751546,0.000055588276,0.9736622,0.015754232,0.0042747366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086773376,0.00002084906,0.03339437,0.00026995165,0.00009218216,0.00008237458,0.048321817,0.0012126955,0.00060852064,0.22273856,0.6929932,0.0001788321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16705596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16705596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19313106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.966097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403374299","doi":"10.1515/9780228022084-016","title":"9 Constitutional Amendment and the Canadian City","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amendment; Constitutional amendment; Political science; Law; Constitution","score_opus":0.028432613227020107,"score_gpt":0.23999215111840497,"score_spread":0.21155953789138487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403374299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007882746,0.007993681,0.00058269966,0.035732504,0.00074720214,0.00006115904,0.0003575541,0.000050971455,0.94659156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35413846,0.006407894,0.0014924027,0.02342526,0.0005915678,0.00014752526,0.0002496711,0.00015761418,0.6133896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945471,0.00070178177,0.00007879963,0.00061316777,0.0012842015,0.002774886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976688,0.00046075886,0.00007782012,0.00019111288,0.00093035214,0.0006710809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002511387,0.0008145769,0.00092796795,0.0026790332,0.042889547,0.019420017,0.0032557128,0.009213649,0.028128862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006378645,0.00095279847,0.0008934273,0.0051129726,0.029458664,0.0035745676,0.0048472267,0.011180192,0.0018808705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000091563425,0.0000075261214,0.0001395444,0.000015937374,0.0000026636058,0.00003827515,0.0013696543,0.00011641372,0.000022438571,0.96050733,0.034486525,0.00328456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034332632,0.000008471293,0.0018920704,0.00015830541,0.00002114595,0.000034835666,0.0036544614,0.00022872743,0.00008450334,0.104767315,0.8890486,0.00006712201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99412006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99628973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17285487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17285487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25528222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9593711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403505563","doi":"10.1130/abs/2024ne-397307","title":"IS BRITAIN DIVIDED BY AN ACADIAN SUTURE?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fibrous joint; Computer science; Medicine; Anatomy","score_opus":0.034557997580148214,"score_gpt":0.3153720524502469,"score_spread":0.2808140548700987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403505563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6097204,0.005898109,0.000181616,0.044080548,0.0006948673,0.0000071892055,0.00015283495,0.000015828755,0.3392487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855092,0.00074747973,0.000029525792,0.0024830217,0.000120455756,0.0000030321353,0.00004260746,0.000008273132,0.011056463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906796,0.00025542738,0.000036051155,0.00011656716,0.000119491015,0.00040453757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980673,0.0005366518,0.0004270423,0.0001452614,0.0004185334,0.00040515812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008468162,0.00011643359,0.00028586466,0.001130766,0.0028218238,0.0046872073,0.0005921462,0.0017001817,0.016730852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005667186,0.00014086913,0.00010366256,0.002192247,0.0077698063,0.0031381203,0.002155211,0.00163143,0.0015163356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082635094,0.00009016815,0.114058875,0.00033419678,0.00007887145,0.003920053,0.16022384,0.0001518638,0.0013852852,0.5409561,0.06083298,0.11714141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060872233,0.00007737593,0.2591485,0.0008533814,0.000061030983,0.00083082076,0.3024598,0.00014245775,0.00043904755,0.03563678,0.40024644,0.00004352434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058699537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08546736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058699537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035618846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017712228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11671573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403728798","doi":"10.21991/cf29477","title":"The Puzzle and Promise of Human Dignity: R v Bissonnette","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.030429458967036686,"score_gpt":0.3182835016711685,"score_spread":0.2878540427041318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403728798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028594326,0.012674545,0.005115789,0.46665663,0.00222187,0.00008481212,0.00009300924,0.00008654479,0.48447242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6433594,0.0059529617,0.006964966,0.16679767,0.0004187533,0.000116415904,0.00004671619,0.00012815182,0.17621498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910322,0.0028721034,0.0003752964,0.0015494833,0.0026131477,0.0015576876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956891,0.0022932622,0.00018692683,0.0002914444,0.0008755643,0.0006636606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008282228,0.00029750288,0.0005760067,0.0005479429,0.012566297,0.009526269,0.0017982664,0.012561234,0.0041025607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014341343,0.00035429717,0.00035474973,0.00060165295,0.024536118,0.005138273,0.005246969,0.013533652,0.0005734149],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000755771,0.000004879657,0.00021684925,0.000027676162,0.0000022731979,0.00016323978,0.0049920585,0.00006727761,0.00009393904,0.9692821,0.018246569,0.006895676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017859658,0.000036879872,0.0010149648,0.0005407789,0.000015638529,0.0003950922,0.014379683,0.0004147051,0.00046961693,0.29355142,0.6890443,0.00011910748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53179663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6129669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46820337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016823478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04302395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9419214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403728899","doi":"10.21991/cf29478","title":"A Promising Piece of the Puzzle: Human Dignity and the Role of Section 1 of the Charter","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Dignity; Section (typography); History; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.016127653866552173,"score_gpt":0.27468008543169004,"score_spread":0.25855243156513785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403728899","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01566634,0.011231115,0.008900546,0.8077729,0.01118942,0.00004451306,0.000097918884,0.00007331604,0.14502396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5902812,0.010673096,0.011307893,0.2858893,0.011470761,0.00016915733,0.00013712973,0.00017026583,0.08990124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969308,0.0015961594,0.00010252917,0.00043437377,0.0004396542,0.0004965305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958306,0.0029678247,0.00021054705,0.00027347272,0.00045295095,0.00026445917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004861552,0.0003944295,0.00044244403,0.00054600503,0.004983135,0.008583014,0.0015463413,0.00706118,0.0061866306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009791164,0.00018279608,0.00056830095,0.0004499232,0.014686848,0.008078933,0.0034224356,0.012025035,0.0007339994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001711604,0.000010808281,0.00023920122,0.000046264864,0.000002875294,0.00011697806,0.0035782284,0.00007166113,0.00016793514,0.95090544,0.036907207,0.007936289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018463375,0.000109133405,0.0012160504,0.00053179136,0.000016301829,0.00026388647,0.008675901,0.000326641,0.00052617205,0.38279328,0.6054567,0.00006569124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008907527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0143602695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99109244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033053413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005033971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025710642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403776856","doi":"10.12797/9788383681696.03","title":"Abortion in Canada and the Importance of Legal Reasoning in R. v. Morgentaler","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Psychology; Political science; Pregnancy; Biology","score_opus":0.017183348767786162,"score_gpt":0.2519612773688602,"score_spread":0.23477792860107405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403776856","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06114308,0.0692651,0.000909605,0.07418527,0.0007968801,0.000073277355,0.00018708763,0.00005019166,0.7933895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78305715,0.039606743,0.0020386665,0.013344986,0.000237472,0.000041825057,0.00010471817,0.00006419805,0.16150427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997543,0.0004956064,0.00003286032,0.00014647513,0.0008980249,0.000884061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986986,0.00061890046,0.00007261079,0.000030953404,0.00035051143,0.0002284021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016618068,0.0002760805,0.00036480458,0.0014267177,0.018972166,0.0083572995,0.0013565065,0.0026112401,0.003576229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034008392,0.0003040797,0.0003221326,0.0026832062,0.015283352,0.0013088433,0.0018338688,0.0042055114,0.00027139904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002084922,0.00001654997,0.0012551638,0.00011665305,0.0000077666755,0.00068188924,0.03706677,0.00042168229,0.00023882568,0.88647026,0.04399106,0.02971242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017037346,0.000023995275,0.011099605,0.0008181627,0.000034430104,0.000441996,0.03733639,0.00079582393,0.00038520174,0.06442982,0.8845172,0.00010033707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99282223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1460739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1460739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18701343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9904332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404022282","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5005213","title":"&lt;span&gt;Confronting the Sexual Assault of Teenage Girls: The Mistake of Age Defence in Canadian Sexual Assault Law&lt;/span&gt;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Mistake; Span (engineering); Psychology; Criminology; Law; Poison control; Injury prevention; Political science; Medicine; Medical emergency; Engineering","score_opus":0.019691520150500012,"score_gpt":0.28434002532844277,"score_spread":0.26464850517794275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404022282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6378886,0.008265525,0.000526621,0.21943538,0.001942482,0.00017415227,0.00043105957,0.000046505862,0.13128972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9594834,0.004597204,0.00032806856,0.015534472,0.00018705714,0.000027947275,0.0000859475,0.00004538844,0.0197105],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99540114,0.0007700453,0.00015460445,0.00021861773,0.001443824,0.0020116926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922438,0.0017772983,0.0011574717,0.00015567873,0.0020550329,0.0026107307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030839078,0.0003859506,0.00045875588,0.0017531727,0.029946532,0.0043699523,0.0031258364,0.007948941,0.009505572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021622524,0.0006889205,0.00048779554,0.0018694361,0.007353731,0.0024579815,0.0036540695,0.012608387,0.0005098002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007318769,0.00019014662,0.09419086,0.00019713226,0.000048921138,0.018146921,0.67665815,0.00032549864,0.00083444465,0.04737354,0.10174366,0.0602176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013177697,0.000046532234,0.09363971,0.0009119667,0.00003900634,0.0054013794,0.7887972,0.0004802419,0.00029789563,0.0022727537,0.10799196,0.00010815902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9831602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99349046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048677683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048677683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11449326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35318297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404128434","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10076","title":"The Legal Landscape of Freedom of Association in Canada: The Complex Path to Half of a Constitutional Freedom","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of association; Path (computing); Degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry); Association (psychology); Political science; Law; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Human rights; Physics","score_opus":0.029891789065787402,"score_gpt":0.27627924826424166,"score_spread":0.24638745919845426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404128434","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17877269,0.009950572,0.00939967,0.17931831,0.00043280516,0.000073076495,0.00046665125,0.000080019156,0.62150615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845589,0.0014084503,0.0013105215,0.0033958596,0.00004905086,0.000014935149,0.00004853704,0.000027898646,0.009185975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900899,0.0020050693,0.00021236617,0.0010210325,0.0037274712,0.002944233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873269,0.0039854986,0.0005070839,0.0007896392,0.0042931815,0.0030976967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006067113,0.00023361939,0.00063549733,0.0027130598,0.031222297,0.020600304,0.0023025495,0.0031626746,0.007520846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01095364,0.0004050566,0.00046340152,0.003925142,0.059711214,0.00521135,0.0066382065,0.0063953614,0.00023323791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010070921,0.0000073189995,0.00094692904,0.000020757217,0.000006684903,0.00008925113,0.00804758,0.0003278467,0.00010882852,0.9769712,0.0059633283,0.0075002257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023624858,0.000023907807,0.014846446,0.0006199866,0.00003728189,0.00016214389,0.046140175,0.0020263349,0.00038040223,0.5429013,0.39264187,0.0001966226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98281556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98962563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16927959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16927959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19529189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9635179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404151707","doi":"10.59962/9780774880831-010","title":"9 Aligning Canadian Law with Indigenous Peoples’ Inherent Rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.016801881402487714,"score_gpt":0.20332706373915427,"score_spread":0.18652518233666654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404151707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008111327,0.0026716236,0.00084753096,0.020705657,0.00046263737,0.00003993342,0.000099442674,0.000036159712,0.96702564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29811063,0.003943595,0.0031506033,0.010255724,0.00022383625,0.00007323894,0.000107784836,0.00010783851,0.6840268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958631,0.0004415132,0.00006598467,0.0003196977,0.0014513722,0.0018582754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775463,0.00047134404,0.000050214858,0.00015023847,0.0011847424,0.00038884179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002706775,0.00052363245,0.00035663543,0.0029923778,0.028922759,0.015331954,0.0020320571,0.004962768,0.021393882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049205814,0.00045023253,0.00047748638,0.0034501115,0.01609224,0.004053595,0.0034679854,0.006632468,0.0011327174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045067295,0.000011038935,0.00033031486,0.000024025177,0.0000025051309,0.000089357796,0.010151226,0.000095045616,0.0000795052,0.9086087,0.06570747,0.014896314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068807553,0.0000061604856,0.0022039616,0.00019435254,0.000012582813,0.000074497504,0.0126975905,0.00018616447,0.00018904638,0.055428572,0.92896247,0.000037794307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99307454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11135953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11135953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18738267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80797374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404346773","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4976697","title":"Threatening Reconciliation: The Supreme Court of Canada’s Foundational Jurisprudence on Aboriginal Rights and Title, 1990-1997&amp;nbsp;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.022235667064941317,"score_gpt":0.3179776824266977,"score_spread":0.29574201536175637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404346773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1394204,0.0060211625,0.0030102853,0.20450896,0.0015180338,0.00021543051,0.000670077,0.00010255922,0.64453316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87168986,0.0011455397,0.0017715085,0.036249932,0.00031882466,0.000117887765,0.00014934933,0.00010965978,0.088447504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98016435,0.0030339148,0.0004417948,0.0016811041,0.0061435048,0.008535397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837917,0.005875656,0.0004856002,0.00092059193,0.006879444,0.002046956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016715083,0.0005821557,0.0011026326,0.0021677879,0.0663184,0.022543192,0.0054846043,0.01728674,0.006167443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036632966,0.0010343461,0.000900056,0.0036387914,0.025191138,0.0051981783,0.0073490716,0.025658706,0.00039856552],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054495536,0.000030424444,0.0016901592,0.0000302993,0.000024989524,0.00029908417,0.019812195,0.0005136445,0.0001478435,0.900487,0.06830939,0.00860056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001952012,0.000045799585,0.019390952,0.00082540547,0.00020242386,0.00023552115,0.03906784,0.0035533577,0.0012132259,0.22787514,0.70706034,0.00033485156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99141335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99645644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2000035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2000035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39591357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92788255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404410368","doi":"10.2307/jj.21874112.9","title":"Des précédents en droit de la famille canadien:","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses de l'Université Laval eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.014461006241355762,"score_gpt":0.2385718593907156,"score_spread":0.22411085314935983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404410368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015011012,0.086871296,0.001005889,0.09758792,0.004690469,0.000040068644,0.00020435698,0.00004776988,0.79454124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34634718,0.038908266,0.0013075579,0.017312156,0.001334813,0.00009343817,0.0001544355,0.0001221901,0.59442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969806,0.0009609164,0.000109298235,0.00034374624,0.0007135859,0.0008918106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978911,0.0010776446,0.000113862014,0.00011386277,0.0004548976,0.0003486235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002857421,0.00051660306,0.0004867428,0.0018694015,0.013078403,0.007090044,0.0012237186,0.0056057526,0.022610642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007298496,0.0005230802,0.00032069642,0.002454933,0.009910633,0.0036904013,0.0037743878,0.009530796,0.0019686737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031637035,0.000038740553,0.00066112826,0.00011831331,0.0000060726707,0.000568427,0.03901658,0.00012640786,0.00012742869,0.7962689,0.12353323,0.039503288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008396759,0.0000123402,0.0017974435,0.00044877842,0.000005095787,0.00022961352,0.010198129,0.00003494768,0.00009110985,0.018298484,0.96885556,0.000020081248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43087408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56167257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5691259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021051513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029663922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85673225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404468661","doi":"10.1007/s44202-024-00282-8","title":"Intersectional racial and gender bias in family court","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discover Psychology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Ottawa Public Health; Manitoba Beekeepers' Association; University of Ottawa","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Gender bias; Psychology; Gender studies; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.12039619817645661,"score_gpt":0.4274670451959085,"score_spread":0.30707084701945186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404468661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9555848,0.000643781,0.0009428323,0.004869166,0.00009010458,0.00002326748,0.00002909786,0.0000057294023,0.03781123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99903595,0.00009187684,0.00010574385,0.0002026128,0.000020449355,0.0000059523504,0.0000040171894,0.0000018479271,0.00053155504],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98782045,0.007892508,0.00042534838,0.0004993375,0.001991261,0.0013710557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98395705,0.008283279,0.004356319,0.0006858446,0.0015970693,0.0011203535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01035672,0.00010878763,0.00019981751,0.0016636755,0.006313772,0.0028825717,0.00060217537,0.0008558195,0.0057227127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036492087,0.00019539111,0.00013749262,0.00095976837,0.00501344,0.0016570047,0.0033512595,0.0010695665,0.00019975465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001742789,0.00020697297,0.5055819,0.0000789571,0.000054400985,0.008178881,0.28697014,0.00029799304,0.0010573111,0.12115645,0.007113221,0.06912961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002219749,0.00018435364,0.35782897,0.00083664554,0.00005471558,0.014982022,0.5091501,0.0015737227,0.002342167,0.055282023,0.057646655,0.000096475684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008534948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025230382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01035672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025992242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018688926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054772258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404806080","doi":"10.1515/9780295804583-015","title":"Letter 12. To Ignace Bourget, Bishop of Montreal, February 6, 1850","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Washington Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.03145209609796945,"score_gpt":0.23506562431093816,"score_spread":0.20361352821296871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404806080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043138294,0.023498636,0.00053500733,0.2853421,0.017227612,0.00020548857,0.0026337048,0.00034086753,0.6659028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007838002,0.000824982,0.00007973535,0.028448094,0.0005207815,0.000029790352,0.00008965811,0.000055672426,0.96211326],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992242,0.000090469206,0.000016649157,0.00009835279,0.0002210097,0.000349313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999411,0.00011239765,0.000026861786,0.00001829229,0.00029133467,0.00014018347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007124066,0.0005854303,0.00045173737,0.0008433347,0.013927039,0.0031341088,0.0012002371,0.0068224785,0.15280513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035954402,0.0007720672,0.00034769598,0.0010002637,0.001990385,0.0016029631,0.0016790415,0.0055318587,0.02525565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000141949195,0.0000039699676,0.00022913699,0.000022697546,0.0000018669913,0.00009763839,0.00055614405,0.00000876652,0.00006963708,0.005450256,0.9901675,0.003378134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004790761,0.0000033483648,0.0009741106,0.000036314923,0.00000182419,0.000026351627,0.00048023553,0.000008836426,0.00005292131,0.00035347472,0.9980508,0.000007107849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.748188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92937803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25181198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013223344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009205147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5111841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404806308","doi":"10.1515/9780295804583-017","title":"Letter 14. To Ignace Bourget, Bishop of Montreal, November 22, 1850","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Washington Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.02905950517244223,"score_gpt":0.23844384128731452,"score_spread":0.20938433611487228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404806308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004290751,0.024794905,0.0005115975,0.32175848,0.018039463,0.00022988056,0.0024536513,0.0003272872,0.62759405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007930666,0.00091839815,0.000077281984,0.035074882,0.00059768796,0.000033552013,0.0000931692,0.000058537968,0.9552158],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908245,0.00010733502,0.000020889322,0.000114814386,0.00026063278,0.00041394797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993343,0.0001331304,0.000030529896,0.000020214911,0.00031727954,0.00016464689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008299897,0.00062514463,0.00052466133,0.00086645066,0.015607219,0.0034332778,0.0013162531,0.007818034,0.14673285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004061337,0.00083096785,0.0003894828,0.0010538062,0.0022380722,0.0016636557,0.0019758202,0.0063389633,0.025505412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016000788,0.0000043118716,0.0002587766,0.0000228145,0.0000022344516,0.00010537111,0.0005633957,0.000009572356,0.00007238867,0.0055291085,0.9902007,0.0032153022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053036597,0.0000037506213,0.0010069628,0.000038114642,0.0000020114765,0.000027452395,0.0005106472,0.0000092892,0.000052694453,0.00038769652,0.99794835,0.000007841239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73285174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9203204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26714826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014091094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010307881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53744304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404826366","doi":"10.1177/00033286241300562","title":"A Tale of Two Doctrines: Marriage in the Diocese of Toronto","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.044928048951427546,"score_gpt":0.3922071308069095,"score_spread":0.34727908185548195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404826366","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068910696,0.47804472,0.0026637139,0.17066069,0.0030848314,0.00006209675,0.00029276076,0.000022678347,0.27625784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8018759,0.16103056,0.0009720535,0.00675023,0.0007455442,0.000055115474,0.00009933509,0.000020669662,0.028450683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980293,0.0010000304,0.000079466,0.00017424289,0.00042760672,0.00028936437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738866,0.001370132,0.00025235143,0.0001380154,0.0004905742,0.0003603418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019547206,0.00028772783,0.0003044812,0.0019476431,0.008734532,0.0051051946,0.0010259643,0.002118391,0.0029792872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029713572,0.00019540901,0.00018457096,0.0036729435,0.026987031,0.0035478098,0.0029704506,0.0031723147,0.00016121405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015870715,0.0000068567438,0.0008511882,0.00045520932,0.000004722176,0.00030089405,0.11119548,0.00009846014,0.00016118023,0.8472738,0.017101059,0.022535244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008779663,0.000025478508,0.005567405,0.0015835788,0.000013923575,0.00034500987,0.14472763,0.00012090571,0.00025043407,0.029700344,0.8176235,0.000033101765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7261301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8500969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27386987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04083223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039825417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5509654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404971028","doi":"10.1353/jur.2024.a945240","title":"Lay Associations of Christ's Faithful and the Church's Response to Allegations of Sexual Abuse","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJurist/˜The œjurist","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bishops; Sexual abuse; Law; Promulgation; Criminology; Child sexual abuse; Virtue; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Medicine; Poison control; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.024223900093380865,"score_gpt":0.3181875562783264,"score_spread":0.2939636561849455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404971028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8855632,0.0012856519,0.00031465176,0.020954506,0.00031244705,0.00003555402,0.000021494609,0.0000070050955,0.09150547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99680686,0.00018714345,0.000048900365,0.00051362714,0.0000336842,0.0000035242226,0.0000033436206,0.0000012724437,0.0024016148],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968941,0.0021148974,0.000088000415,0.000081668775,0.00040945644,0.0004117778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865588,0.006466117,0.0031509644,0.00032428568,0.0016924223,0.001807446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00325123,0.00009461298,0.000116794086,0.0009374213,0.004140459,0.0017582957,0.00037798946,0.0010023318,0.006490455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023095375,0.00010869638,0.000063084655,0.0004243576,0.0032933177,0.0007318939,0.0022056154,0.0018405934,0.00026206236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017852118,0.0006310746,0.17149398,0.00028181323,0.00004203674,0.004401258,0.62174064,0.00015645288,0.0023410677,0.07715944,0.025186852,0.0963869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001911615,0.00014794889,0.1894079,0.0005967966,0.000023383049,0.0015566448,0.7071254,0.00025815098,0.00090041355,0.0057229046,0.09420706,0.000034229583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009314236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02249428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009314236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016182329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019984741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02171278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405010327","doi":"10.1080/02757206.2024.2435660","title":"More as a sin rather than a crime: clerical sexual abuse and jurisdictional pluralism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Anthropology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Social Innovation; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Criminology; Pluralism (philosophy); Sexual abuse; Sociology; Political science; Law; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Philosophy; Medicine; Epistemology; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.03228605509485229,"score_gpt":0.3389019885954877,"score_spread":0.30661593350063543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405010327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62835443,0.015447741,0.0021622847,0.13060817,0.00039488563,0.000026584434,0.00002480864,0.000011872661,0.2229692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943408,0.0013590552,0.00012623677,0.002409016,0.0001017028,0.0000073151955,0.0000035813655,0.0000050379504,0.0016472774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98830557,0.008973934,0.00020086447,0.0005100031,0.00079560425,0.0012140151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99251986,0.004513919,0.0010268132,0.00044149483,0.0005991068,0.00089884276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007735025,0.00019688312,0.0004350224,0.0020136924,0.020972386,0.013871284,0.0011184701,0.0039948635,0.0026251439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009064489,0.00041445336,0.00030924834,0.0020101115,0.09294993,0.011778331,0.010658242,0.0062589967,0.00014511732],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008503524,0.000035392244,0.0054801954,0.000026259879,0.0000060373072,0.00062331505,0.3750184,0.00006365109,0.00004573148,0.6106841,0.002556274,0.0054522017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012252393,0.000033988596,0.008920227,0.00044096922,0.000014342856,0.0012372237,0.73619616,0.00026382803,0.000113956106,0.18808997,0.06463411,0.000042902797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0309517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05567442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0309517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007836995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057706903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061543107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405061322","doi":"10.1176/appi.books.9781615379750.lg04","title":"Chapter 4. Delineating the Meaning of Disturbance of Mind in Canadian Infanticide Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"American Psychiatric Association Publishing eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Meaning (existential); Law; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.018963689405661652,"score_gpt":0.2655176989360784,"score_spread":0.24655400953041676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405061322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003858572,0.0663337,0.0012763403,0.018558906,0.001587506,0.000059220805,0.00015279108,0.000049105318,0.90812385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16133767,0.074323684,0.002888515,0.009118335,0.0009980965,0.00009992036,0.0002491779,0.00009052242,0.7508941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995498,0.0000641738,0.000010374079,0.000028328837,0.00023358256,0.00011375895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996661,0.00011943777,0.000017396142,0.0000098864475,0.00014476303,0.000042364703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047295698,0.00049608486,0.0002486425,0.002585997,0.006452741,0.0038197758,0.0011022305,0.0020277752,0.01425307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011110234,0.00023167075,0.0003493673,0.0022534602,0.006319971,0.0013440633,0.0010106663,0.0024475185,0.00087987486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071337868,0.000014554728,0.00042692912,0.00012464056,0.0000030100184,0.00026427078,0.011392364,0.00017869571,0.00020978857,0.6995358,0.22981264,0.05803013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024806418,0.0000068321524,0.004975259,0.00071164157,0.000008389294,0.0003424918,0.006064708,0.00019032351,0.00016742448,0.054743078,0.93277,0.000017324286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7828577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9099506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96797734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032022662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026627915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43684214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326970","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.9021","title":"Section 15: How Indigenous Use of the Charter Tool is About Returning to Respect Not Creating Equity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill-Queen's University Press; University of Windsor; Yukon University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Equity (law); Repatriation; Government (linguistics); Colonialism; Disadvantage; Charter; Political science; Constitution; Law; Sociology; Public administration; High Court; Freedom of information","score_opus":0.10521765265068823,"score_gpt":0.37993091320413935,"score_spread":0.27471326055345113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08401229,0.003426392,0.007323445,0.09329925,0.0015038482,0.00015056154,0.000119321805,0.00015526978,0.81000954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82231146,0.002248282,0.0046054297,0.014192624,0.00020448782,0.000086081294,0.00006662119,0.00015539413,0.1561296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.990334,0.0029295995,0.00027986776,0.00088926696,0.0031169457,0.0024502852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993411,0.00254363,0.00044630835,0.0005241116,0.0022033288,0.00087163044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00897924,0.00033152697,0.00030292085,0.000990107,0.019434426,0.0148249185,0.001852703,0.0037137468,0.006012027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012586822,0.00025898582,0.00032385025,0.0013235322,0.042446367,0.004992933,0.0046461155,0.005757451,0.0004924306],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011335117,0.000015108366,0.001804,0.0000631958,0.0000049736605,0.00025430776,0.14979151,0.00017435281,0.00031192214,0.80310494,0.023035137,0.021429215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007786569,0.00003497334,0.0057073496,0.00060362654,0.000018731667,0.0003745387,0.09776484,0.00022010437,0.0008146219,0.06254248,0.83183974,0.00007127162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8349822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8563389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16501778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036706742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.077303864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33197916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406587778","doi":"","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL STATUS OF CANADIAN CROWN PEOPLES: PROBLEM QUESTIONS","year":2018,"lang":"uk","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Crown (dentistry); Law; Political science; Legal status; Medicine","score_opus":0.209928550156389,"score_gpt":0.5263830772853679,"score_spread":0.3164545271289789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406587778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3968018,0.00889202,0.00068399555,0.18510483,0.0006083406,0.000103001876,0.0013928959,0.000039756877,0.4063733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779028,0.0017690355,0.00041386532,0.006335981,0.00018817937,0.000029708466,0.00016488304,0.000020208297,0.013175375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9808441,0.0019192373,0.00041679206,0.0013664626,0.006164662,0.009288781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9720133,0.0076640802,0.0017733618,0.0011182997,0.011730645,0.005700381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012911105,0.0003226127,0.000969636,0.0073775207,0.044541616,0.020625345,0.006649725,0.006455674,0.013925624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043728333,0.000664694,0.0006108647,0.012414457,0.043073617,0.006063488,0.0056474754,0.007206154,0.00050554425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057997175,0.000067226014,0.012945709,0.00015232265,0.000032373977,0.00020957713,0.050461244,0.00018846703,0.00020375288,0.8827901,0.03137635,0.021514868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008154503,0.00004394538,0.12578675,0.0013857526,0.00013672226,0.00026728562,0.2798316,0.0006594747,0.0005937426,0.22098802,0.3698872,0.00033797155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99028075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1286955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1286955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25722092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9337556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406923504","doi":"10.3138/tjt-2024-0052","title":"The United Church of Canada's Theology of Inclusion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Theology; Philosophy; Sociology; Religious studies; Gender studies","score_opus":0.01709733267465191,"score_gpt":0.3098861851985769,"score_spread":0.292788852523925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406923504","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014266311,0.0196905,0.0016046839,0.076771475,0.0017961533,0.000037500507,0.00025223815,0.000052195344,0.88552886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83126456,0.01214151,0.0016493141,0.012646103,0.0004840466,0.0000682412,0.000133153,0.000098447425,0.14151463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99719465,0.0006490734,0.00003798364,0.0001478316,0.0010621506,0.00090826635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984003,0.00029139305,0.000083559746,0.00007479012,0.000614902,0.00053513254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001392951,0.00035589974,0.000312454,0.0015066125,0.027063113,0.0093891565,0.0011896641,0.002355325,0.007678156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003236614,0.00020995815,0.00023551456,0.0031225365,0.023380367,0.002651503,0.0036535696,0.0035374274,0.0005270841],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007935314,0.0000043202886,0.00043588848,0.000039788127,0.0000019366446,0.000074183314,0.014247822,0.000055260945,0.000027875174,0.92886966,0.04801007,0.008225271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007968033,0.000005765485,0.004107311,0.0005115437,0.000007996358,0.00015599915,0.0189155,0.00016829788,0.000076313394,0.050489713,0.9255233,0.00003036924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9703579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98365974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07276503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07276503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11493045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5279497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407221364","doi":"10.3138/9781442634985-006","title":"CHAPTER TWO Situating the Constitutional, Legal, and Historical Foundations of Canadian Municipal Government","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Public administration; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06195355818328334,"score_gpt":0.2628243161618555,"score_spread":0.20087075797857212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407221364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017871087,0.020473585,0.0018000026,0.024146652,0.0006775285,0.00006730748,0.0005775627,0.00006850729,0.9343178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4429138,0.014791662,0.002315772,0.0037527385,0.0002270579,0.000066798115,0.00037509744,0.0001319263,0.5354251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902093,0.00015041696,0.0000135797045,0.00008314993,0.00034390585,0.00038792135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992686,0.00021956992,0.000029801377,0.00003525093,0.0003078154,0.00013901042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069990824,0.00037282726,0.00028765708,0.0023610138,0.015753988,0.009227143,0.0012131088,0.0019283409,0.022716535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001883981,0.00032785517,0.0002509089,0.005465041,0.009829655,0.0021936859,0.0012180024,0.0026303977,0.00077054865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064648716,0.0000065083227,0.00045320697,0.000038305236,0.0000015101991,0.00007804303,0.014035848,0.00014777614,0.000105334526,0.92157876,0.0513455,0.012202846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002486976,0.0000033960307,0.0032809249,0.00022642537,0.0000060788116,0.00005697169,0.016009565,0.0001359241,0.00014378561,0.032372,0.9477439,0.000018543298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98448217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11787326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11787326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.120655455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8552344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407417097","doi":"10.18543/fvsc6124","title":"Los pueblos indígenas de Canadá y la defensa de sus territorios sagrados Análisis sociológico y jurisprudencial","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"book","venue":"Universidad de Deusto eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.014100925064831587,"score_gpt":0.2840338031398744,"score_spread":0.26993287807504285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407417097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6171477,0.009146568,0.0015939396,0.01829049,0.00011954684,0.00008974581,0.0010374229,0.000032863973,0.3525417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9417442,0.0047962414,0.0006538645,0.001157364,0.000019816587,0.00002669901,0.0002460026,0.000020133972,0.051335633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982815,0.00023528902,0.000031752297,0.00015315792,0.0006708446,0.0006274463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982383,0.00033470176,0.00016392232,0.00007942362,0.00085861154,0.0003249298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009960054,0.0002976016,0.00028897537,0.0026971188,0.015450223,0.0073014675,0.00096108194,0.0009118293,0.0073783174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027937563,0.00019299074,0.00021225924,0.005131496,0.009252671,0.0013397563,0.001935391,0.0021664063,0.0003426684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118576696,0.00006926286,0.11339187,0.00031732087,0.00006273799,0.0016137385,0.24269666,0.0007790379,0.0017312217,0.5239777,0.026689442,0.08855248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011335613,0.000039246945,0.24850017,0.00070483336,0.000072878516,0.0003864959,0.32957277,0.00069858803,0.0011226063,0.014927702,0.40388346,0.00007982315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97698194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9912198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053481318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053481318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08049394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38803595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408092856","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1445","title":"From Rights to Justice: Perspectives on Access to Disability Justice in BritishColumbia (Attorney General) v. Council of Canadians with Disabilities","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.07085717314053648,"score_gpt":0.3558371160412499,"score_spread":0.28497994290071343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408092856","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066428214,0.07014788,0.0021314893,0.32751673,0.0010141678,0.00009695824,0.00026005832,0.000018916013,0.5323855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87332845,0.020097468,0.0007736928,0.052353173,0.0006104438,0.00011057775,0.00010916103,0.000040591232,0.05257645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.982746,0.005232713,0.00032509374,0.0009789065,0.0034436518,0.0072735827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909174,0.005584407,0.000357821,0.0002101885,0.001514193,0.0014161167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00975265,0.0005989162,0.00095431565,0.0040509393,0.04660438,0.022469074,0.004452022,0.01866278,0.0072701247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011345855,0.00071856193,0.00077788625,0.005702183,0.051300466,0.008924921,0.007297135,0.017216465,0.00032834813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011023983,0.000021635824,0.00075978955,0.00009861278,0.000009284991,0.0006578438,0.031228662,0.00011327261,0.00010571488,0.9499296,0.012872994,0.004191607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005536891,0.00006546533,0.011438533,0.0018078806,0.00007322202,0.00049225026,0.13340984,0.0004062147,0.00035882188,0.28226486,0.569386,0.00024148423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95684886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97598743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09614757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09614757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09788911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6976027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408092878","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1444","title":"Council of Canadians with Disabilities: Another Reminder to Resolve Cases on the Merits","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.11468067553825669,"score_gpt":0.3321221844529251,"score_spread":0.2174415089146684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408092878","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005954385,0.006248401,0.0026961719,0.8166534,0.0048413374,0.00005539671,0.00009528723,0.00005123969,0.16340446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31160316,0.00793904,0.009639477,0.525707,0.0046501467,0.00012375037,0.00018210088,0.0001972995,0.13995805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.978511,0.0036438995,0.00056076667,0.001454337,0.011248292,0.004581781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873768,0.003995456,0.00033085354,0.0005012945,0.0062714457,0.0015242039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010123208,0.0007254065,0.00071256794,0.0022899364,0.042883158,0.014647844,0.0036775197,0.026768476,0.0052060303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028179593,0.000598969,0.0010610855,0.0021942798,0.022787405,0.008868731,0.0056351256,0.031997014,0.00072008587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000099230865,0.000016104761,0.00057521136,0.000046314726,0.000008100996,0.000575179,0.010872038,0.00012392951,0.00018652344,0.6855536,0.29098564,0.011047418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022234799,0.000013129734,0.0007767494,0.00020554976,0.000016152744,0.00031646885,0.008577592,0.00016048388,0.00020193464,0.039418742,0.9502111,0.000079880905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89271206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9399501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89271206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05450206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.096339904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39544195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408170656","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x24000838","title":"General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Synod; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014200758939490672,"score_gpt":0.284790262601031,"score_spread":0.27058950366154033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408170656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04345656,0.022916136,0.0005394729,0.028444663,0.0033936875,0.00020601183,0.013389201,0.00025435427,0.8873999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16745542,0.0069350717,0.00039799558,0.0034769485,0.00028668638,0.000047555808,0.0018018916,0.00016132969,0.8194371],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954295,0.00004253249,0.0000123126965,0.000066044944,0.0001429859,0.00019327937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992969,0.00004998773,0.000029620285,0.000032911474,0.0003495477,0.00024095376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038447126,0.00030020135,0.00029902393,0.0013771016,0.013911567,0.0024114503,0.00065363146,0.00087968336,0.083906844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009669247,0.0002369484,0.000106161584,0.002481193,0.0014026574,0.0008143593,0.0011624205,0.0011714714,0.0059292507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042570027,0.000015441476,0.003998415,0.00022603868,0.00000530051,0.00032495474,0.010945992,0.000043909033,0.0005093933,0.03863426,0.89800245,0.047251206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020155285,0.0000029550558,0.008017494,0.00009078506,0.0000015167592,0.000060419978,0.0051871655,0.0000123218015,0.00006911215,0.00025997302,0.98628926,0.000006957842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9625161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083906844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023921797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030202147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28069633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408509886","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5176889","title":"Legal Pluralism in Canada and the Vitality of Indigenous Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Vitality; Indigenous; Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Political science; Sociology; Legal realism; Comparative law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology; Ecology","score_opus":0.01002613972229188,"score_gpt":0.27349016904470624,"score_spread":0.26346402932241436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408509886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.729256,0.0059446045,0.0007408046,0.05246858,0.00021207957,0.00006016249,0.0002722038,0.000025859901,0.2110197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888564,0.0008558727,0.00024460515,0.0013106702,0.000020327167,0.00000830408,0.000027406226,0.000012066292,0.008664406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99086565,0.0011925186,0.00019478734,0.0007771316,0.0023840312,0.0045859143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98380023,0.00496745,0.0010615722,0.00051386567,0.0055854274,0.0040714988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005837204,0.0002648442,0.0007731197,0.0030843092,0.04162202,0.014643991,0.0025299268,0.003194772,0.0074506076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018433504,0.00038615137,0.00035453166,0.005310888,0.02412496,0.004154239,0.00603066,0.0060790894,0.00019189496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001241279,0.0001265259,0.030654933,0.00019048425,0.000065957785,0.0009106538,0.21163143,0.0008528042,0.00045565856,0.7011991,0.014806294,0.03898194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008501525,0.00007622572,0.15246649,0.0009821737,0.00015250604,0.00052322034,0.43662685,0.002581804,0.00096008065,0.111893035,0.29332384,0.00032877148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99866796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8287615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17123848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28742653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9612459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408605083","doi":"10.3735/9781961844056.book-part-095","title":"Constitution Act of Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03189581833621465,"score_gpt":0.284217254932708,"score_spread":0.25232143659649336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408605083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004708285,0.0056663053,0.00041660157,0.0064255153,0.0016916575,0.00016274523,0.005890146,0.0002052697,0.9790709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013393285,0.011273813,0.0020396013,0.008910516,0.000454216,0.00035660696,0.0066811927,0.00032166924,0.95656914],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942062,0.0003660622,0.00025748962,0.0005864624,0.003402507,0.0011811439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99590474,0.00037569992,0.00010418065,0.0002663997,0.0030688017,0.0002800784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001757786,0.0011625156,0.0008518598,0.0048262253,0.010870714,0.010074971,0.001955414,0.0046529346,0.06921442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007336813,0.00057077303,0.00057472015,0.008188959,0.0037350792,0.0025923955,0.002080337,0.0059563746,0.027366463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014094724,0.000012002238,0.00016838274,0.00011644427,0.0000042039424,0.00006921759,0.00052623276,0.00013645379,0.00014062387,0.2912611,0.6849378,0.022613538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016656481,9.221419e-7,0.00014042748,0.00004677027,0.000001630487,0.000009873049,0.00004226571,0.000010381313,0.00001747539,0.0011275877,0.99859506,0.0000059076633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9304496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9346464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069550395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06500325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15555671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47163385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408999767","doi":"10.14712/23366478.2025.220","title":"Předmluva Alaina Dudoita, mimořádného a zplnomocněného velvyslance Kanady v České republice","year":2020,"lang":"cs","type":"article","venue":"AUC IURIDICA","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.041106600753431394,"score_gpt":0.29759983124927936,"score_spread":0.25649323049584793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408999767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23458564,0.06370769,0.013767948,0.06806855,0.0059746117,0.0003114942,0.0022882235,0.00061385834,0.610682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8077028,0.013694426,0.004658945,0.0026945705,0.00045522532,0.000121768266,0.00043639343,0.0002880172,0.16994786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999225,0.00020515142,0.000045931276,0.00013784121,0.00026252083,0.00012347985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902487,0.00024299335,0.00012336884,0.000086442386,0.00031587572,0.00020650878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010036258,0.00022165358,0.0004996001,0.0009291742,0.0031313465,0.005992977,0.00047154975,0.00060961256,0.021339063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031301142,0.0001900917,0.00032327313,0.0009950342,0.0014074027,0.0021797337,0.0029366142,0.0021272828,0.0031128621],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048478824,0.00028778688,0.023597859,0.002489867,0.00007392666,0.0017222323,0.039239097,0.0013004432,0.0086612,0.47340965,0.16380568,0.28492746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010094066,0.00005081541,0.0113640055,0.00041433572,0.000014218403,0.00047184585,0.0073112496,0.00026178657,0.0012731549,0.007440212,0.9713515,0.000036718153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011567169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018137628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9884328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028383406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049574515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07138628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409975918","doi":"10.1515/9782766302789-023","title":"Le juge Louis-Philippe Brodeur : un défenseur pas si discret du droit civil québécois à la Cour suprême du Canada","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01341693823279707,"score_gpt":0.22121563823044574,"score_spread":0.20779869999764866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409975918","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024226628,0.040873244,0.0017302968,0.08014859,0.0038132714,0.000059045837,0.00041769908,0.00011226612,0.848619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11385312,0.0060862172,0.0005972255,0.004896546,0.00022522228,0.0000316898,0.00006975391,0.00011569791,0.8741246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989365,0.00016542083,0.000013550756,0.00014521302,0.00035757187,0.00038171542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995067,0.000116119845,0.000017796992,0.000020149066,0.00020425509,0.00013500449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008256599,0.00072644005,0.0004020824,0.0009245503,0.019271001,0.007711474,0.00102939,0.0040497333,0.020948088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018393261,0.0005443751,0.00035298534,0.0014327645,0.005819044,0.0022416327,0.0017249755,0.0068192324,0.0019513515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003235297,0.000023485649,0.0013195443,0.000051052768,0.000012770266,0.00040269876,0.013450973,0.0003205323,0.0002694571,0.571438,0.3785701,0.03410896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005164934,0.0000046698333,0.0016580592,0.00010045613,0.0000052188843,0.00009445841,0.0047669336,0.00012195729,0.00014515723,0.006076832,0.98700106,0.000019944098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9791269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99142003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058038045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058038045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07544863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42109746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409976098","doi":"10.1515/9782766302789-031","title":"« Plus qu’un droit, mieux qu’un contrat, l’emphytéose est une institution1 » : l’évolution historique de l’emphytéose en droit québécois","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.018808217300351694,"score_gpt":0.2610707020825472,"score_spread":0.24226248478219548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409976098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09732468,0.018596834,0.0022016552,0.05163769,0.0008144423,0.000034075063,0.00037703366,0.00006693279,0.8289467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4505635,0.0047607296,0.000856124,0.0030862242,0.00012336482,0.000023313598,0.00009851121,0.00009628492,0.5403919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999393,0.00015372597,0.0000103071525,0.000093267074,0.00015830141,0.00019130665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937314,0.00022531334,0.00005288213,0.000044536693,0.0001946864,0.000109433546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007526331,0.00038590815,0.00019780437,0.0011124553,0.010692073,0.0059733186,0.0007755236,0.0022282233,0.018218609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016515856,0.0003085636,0.0001647362,0.0021780396,0.011116833,0.002968727,0.0012738014,0.0032510862,0.0009762378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023024746,0.000015504442,0.0030891646,0.0000672626,0.0000070820743,0.00045770593,0.09542116,0.00018513884,0.0004377961,0.77432084,0.081827715,0.044147573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005288597,0.000010903239,0.009905091,0.00019000877,0.0000056045524,0.00023397013,0.02211435,0.0001759514,0.00032641474,0.011276596,0.95572865,0.00002705708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94439197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9806646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055608034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03404457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031853545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24701178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410242589","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avae032","title":"First Nations’ Citizenship and Kinship Compared: Belonging’s Stake in Legality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kinship; Citizenship; Politics; Principle of legality; Political science; Law; Fictive kinship; Sociology","score_opus":0.08467716980806435,"score_gpt":0.37401767553068943,"score_spread":0.2893405057226251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410242589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6848005,0.000589787,0.002254848,0.0101177795,0.00008378211,0.000016439346,0.00003861263,0.000007902427,0.30209035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990101,0.000038900536,0.00003969999,0.00009265643,0.000009913503,0.0000027046008,0.000004627324,0.0000010760612,0.00080041535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713194,0.0015472316,0.000091595895,0.0002853368,0.00040133548,0.00054250634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98992985,0.0044755233,0.0020777956,0.0005966001,0.00084490585,0.0020753634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029614926,0.00013034852,0.0002909947,0.0011357891,0.004272681,0.006357426,0.0005696819,0.0015421426,0.009416236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009972632,0.000089942696,0.00019329185,0.00093568757,0.01937395,0.0064752614,0.006365133,0.002992651,0.00023697165],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004258188,0.00011478977,0.020653322,0.00003109014,0.000016034204,0.00033118937,0.02904008,0.0002575057,0.00015564653,0.939668,0.0011751815,0.008514464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033039643,0.00010827085,0.08047329,0.00034025701,0.000036586553,0.00057031633,0.10806985,0.0016497208,0.00054567354,0.77657443,0.031528432,0.000070081005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004181021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043752086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.995819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027219069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009788913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0315004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410260561","doi":"10.1353/ces.2025.a960311","title":"A Public Opinion Discussion about the Canadian Oath of Citizenship","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian ethnic studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oath; Citizenship; Public opinion; Political science; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.26019910579530836,"score_gpt":0.4180588853166936,"score_spread":0.15785977952138525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410260561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9145702,0.0008036463,0.0016703223,0.022931164,0.00038785374,0.00013824827,0.00029291984,0.00006176675,0.059143882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895488,0.0002974922,0.00038332134,0.0013516642,0.000046716006,0.000040588922,0.00004974017,0.000027958225,0.00825378],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98776335,0.0044487105,0.00027653459,0.00071526994,0.0049794223,0.0018167094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97984916,0.01071836,0.001429137,0.0005410396,0.005742357,0.0017199467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010183563,0.00036750914,0.00040190454,0.0017752505,0.024596665,0.006761785,0.0017854177,0.0024104076,0.0046984707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021208834,0.00027887092,0.00034593785,0.0026822647,0.0159694,0.0024333007,0.0039858823,0.0034341116,0.00029552908],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054735447,0.00001969623,0.005877105,0.00013466671,0.000006868771,0.0007510512,0.972737,0.00009614371,0.0016255158,0.006361809,0.0042234845,0.008111837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006435573,0.000028270464,0.009167129,0.0001581758,0.0000102446265,0.00009937188,0.9042186,0.00014375724,0.0007209185,0.0004559155,0.08494634,0.000044748056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8658971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8665756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13410288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045621794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048631124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33101088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410496052","doi":"10.1007/s42439-025-00107-9","title":"A Reflection on Decolonization as a Cultural Process: Evidence from the Canadian Jurisprudence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jus Cogens","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decolonization; Jurisprudence; Reflection (computer programming); Process (computing); Political science; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06163942799497077,"score_gpt":0.4048499140175633,"score_spread":0.3432104860225925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410496052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6601549,0.0040520625,0.0019665165,0.107803956,0.00028370274,0.00011977685,0.00015509059,0.000037252743,0.22542676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98143643,0.00061197893,0.00034643256,0.006586843,0.000030709656,0.000021926597,0.000020914324,0.000043924785,0.010900938],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97651684,0.0072316113,0.00055117597,0.002277552,0.006734589,0.0066882307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93645537,0.04403669,0.0034524954,0.0026962399,0.010475336,0.002883865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02068742,0.0006063337,0.0008702003,0.0030425352,0.053739987,0.015460404,0.004703622,0.010237923,0.006890656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05764552,0.0006392322,0.0005345369,0.006375413,0.077251226,0.007848593,0.009127663,0.014668747,0.0002943896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003477772,0.0000436128,0.0042829537,0.0000803666,0.000011570819,0.00040668694,0.76971084,0.000094442825,0.00035969596,0.20886374,0.006344887,0.009766451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003974926,0.000032061067,0.026145222,0.00047201366,0.00004557449,0.00016543911,0.81194514,0.00020020406,0.0006196827,0.015993446,0.14423588,0.00010557007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9735065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9831238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12513362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12513362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20010538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9079122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410850843","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5274206","title":"Unity in Canada: Experimental measures of feelings towards people with similar or different views","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03258094649534179,"score_gpt":0.3035498321625428,"score_spread":0.270968885667201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410850843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936581,0.00003745888,0.000087740606,0.00010175546,0.000013904854,0.00011117917,0.00011338669,0.000004936871,0.0058715376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945773,0.000049096205,0.00036195025,0.00010075925,0.0000044820185,0.00014717538,0.00018472096,0.000005743588,0.0045687496],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996391,0.0010800966,0.00014998192,0.00045385526,0.0012807974,0.00064419373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866421,0.0037254107,0.0018538754,0.0011652738,0.0032796282,0.003333652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003399742,0.000563858,0.0005108049,0.0010757067,0.013023327,0.0035885486,0.0013371393,0.0011769818,0.0071229897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017457347,0.00047820926,0.00047228436,0.0014812083,0.005777397,0.0013982853,0.0031582622,0.002395745,0.00052568805],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010717336,0.015423855,0.40338734,0.00035272204,0.00022011252,0.00048599407,0.49307767,0.000999317,0.009873867,0.009295049,0.007923197,0.048243526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007954461,0.0029048743,0.7277901,0.00013108455,0.00009985529,0.000091890346,0.2509224,0.0010678244,0.0025467786,0.0014249457,0.011957654,0.00026700064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92925334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9569024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07074666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03471455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029507674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25187284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411015651","doi":"10.61959/ltby1168f","title":"Entretien avec Rachel Margolis sur les tendances en matière de divorce au Canada","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.03380913589689765,"score_gpt":0.2787952473053478,"score_spread":0.24498611140845017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411015651","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03634784,0.077007845,0.0007202108,0.84333503,0.006809737,0.000061972205,0.002121615,0.00008845848,0.033507336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3669861,0.19253106,0.0027177564,0.18155852,0.005581886,0.0002270461,0.0019110221,0.00034446572,0.24814226],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746287,0.00039669118,0.00006720992,0.00031000734,0.0014142228,0.00034900068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869904,0.002520328,0.0005502459,0.00018544757,0.006989904,0.0027636895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003705321,0.00045669865,0.0005274548,0.002761848,0.011448742,0.0036817994,0.0012437328,0.0018254981,0.008349838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012565576,0.00042835317,0.0003863756,0.0031072265,0.0030160989,0.0017581778,0.002098811,0.0043900684,0.0012661297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063668595,0.000046421996,0.033153612,0.0002584292,0.00004755913,0.00040232958,0.025067981,0.00026570002,0.0003697865,0.009615905,0.84209275,0.08861579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001354526,0.00003491182,0.06810543,0.0012144569,0.000041824762,0.0003235086,0.029923346,0.0002523802,0.0003653757,0.002171635,0.8974521,0.00010131497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94753224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9811818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052467763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030992636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.067360125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22486836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411079892","doi":"10.1093/9780198961109.003.0003","title":"Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council","keywords":"Supreme court; Doctrine; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Charter","score_opus":0.02629445206416738,"score_gpt":0.2785950668315043,"score_spread":0.25230061476733695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411079892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000580763,0.0018440705,0.00018340796,0.002410367,0.00035828425,0.0000245583,0.0015940861,0.0000913912,0.99291307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0061730603,0.0017764642,0.00037538286,0.0010729384,0.000059025802,0.00001330755,0.00081468694,0.00006234664,0.9896528],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939287,0.000024547619,0.000015067865,0.000101310565,0.00031609458,0.00015018292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995484,0.000029046623,0.00001064086,0.000025785717,0.00030930838,0.00007687012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022704898,0.00050243683,0.00039757375,0.0017113376,0.006993112,0.004709852,0.0009453984,0.0014982212,0.3732183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006809728,0.0002927894,0.00035127028,0.002475364,0.00093330315,0.0012223398,0.001262811,0.0015897689,0.083429456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019054662,0.000017576558,0.0004679677,0.00012343166,0.000004084161,0.00023968754,0.00041962138,0.00015818753,0.00023290543,0.18256176,0.74559146,0.0701642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001348928,0.0000013111955,0.00025248132,0.000030256193,0.0000010478307,0.000030584306,0.00008241044,0.0000250519,0.00003577547,0.0010561965,0.99848086,0.000002751107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8136707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92155474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3732183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023104414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026796024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411238539","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/j7rh9_v1","title":"Bijural Foundations: The Civil Law Tradition’s Role in Shaping Canadian Constitutional Institutions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Constitutional law; Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.11975753597106666,"score_gpt":0.3579448162068785,"score_spread":0.23818728023581187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411238539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4280749,0.00403035,0.004975361,0.025852412,0.0001315676,0.000057434238,0.00030515128,0.0000705652,0.5365022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99152666,0.0005931043,0.0009251748,0.00040234983,0.000010007455,0.000005535836,0.000030181824,0.000020134381,0.0064868266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714005,0.00056745,0.00004229547,0.00037274096,0.000833372,0.0010441066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955083,0.0012868397,0.0003547683,0.0002999347,0.0016583379,0.0008918262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029432198,0.00020155746,0.00023450557,0.002962967,0.020005535,0.009319161,0.0012703587,0.0010270821,0.0072141206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007101443,0.00023112731,0.00020779233,0.0036624747,0.027377985,0.002744086,0.0035953806,0.002027229,0.00023281755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035340512,0.000014553943,0.015007026,0.000066532455,0.000016391505,0.0003290249,0.1018912,0.0006478606,0.0005887895,0.83119756,0.004549429,0.045656215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002892162,0.000043181706,0.12182364,0.0005888878,0.00009617217,0.0003423571,0.16804902,0.0027138353,0.0011899382,0.15275039,0.5522177,0.00015593917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9833071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8625046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13749541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15331379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411641238","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.6226638","title":"The Law of Parenthood in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.011252754354458145,"score_gpt":0.25628961350383395,"score_spread":0.2450368591493758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411641238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013714582,0.036136273,0.001435148,0.03150865,0.00081947213,0.0000659401,0.00059610757,0.00010665118,0.91561705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43465725,0.034183066,0.0031859635,0.011707586,0.00021960119,0.00009554951,0.00036204665,0.000102000915,0.51548696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983197,0.000120676916,0.000024359106,0.000114479284,0.0008210625,0.00059974514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938023,0.0000789151,0.000020211099,0.000018932544,0.0003582127,0.00014344403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006669568,0.00031097553,0.00031319365,0.00092448766,0.01561259,0.00634461,0.0014400294,0.0021440845,0.0070126583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017675776,0.0004341696,0.00026207935,0.0024455378,0.0047513493,0.0010441153,0.0013864678,0.0028394447,0.00066980894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000622697,0.0000065965273,0.0008052349,0.000047311907,0.000003646421,0.00014223077,0.005314586,0.00032278028,0.00011866251,0.86165226,0.10643343,0.025146937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056107665,0.0000058246283,0.0035382311,0.00021702182,0.0000095921505,0.000101744605,0.002715219,0.000401872,0.00012000786,0.022628047,0.97023207,0.000024804569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99683774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11495516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11495516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24149859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.834062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411985590","doi":"10.15353/cjds.v12i3.1044","title":"Review of Metanarratives of Disability: Culture, Assumed Authority, and the Normative Social Order","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Disability Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Order (exchange); Sociology; Social order; Gender studies; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.08900392555942586,"score_gpt":0.39388577211127196,"score_spread":0.3048818465518461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411985590","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004179997,0.9926807,0.00060761865,0.0029804609,0.00095444126,0.000010725633,0.000019309915,0.000004377577,0.002324302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013472465,0.9815066,0.00069687923,0.0022712743,0.0013006451,0.000066219276,0.000067910885,0.000018691226,0.00059921975],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868978,0.0070014605,0.0028316677,0.0007214619,0.0021924775,0.0003551004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90869826,0.07629171,0.0053408043,0.0020750428,0.0069324076,0.00066182646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017195242,0.0010717768,0.003112837,0.013817998,0.0016033746,0.006602708,0.0024761893,0.0025210585,0.00368714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06751487,0.0008044553,0.0013076594,0.015310286,0.008209294,0.011333656,0.003493956,0.0044551846,0.0006553736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018722742,0.00004824907,0.0012425302,0.15029302,0.0007956228,0.0004324716,0.023904644,0.0003713299,0.00040650275,0.1541356,0.049646515,0.6185363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027353326,0.00009398623,0.0031463467,0.26072747,0.0006445779,0.0013661555,0.010549445,0.000138721,0.00038796192,0.033867862,0.68897027,0.0000797215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006618957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014396599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017195242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007695734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014464327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09093821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412712941","doi":"10.1163/22116028-90000018a","title":"CANADA: Supreme Court Saskatchewan Federation of Labour et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Saskatchewan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Labour Law Reports Online","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Supreme court; Law; Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.012652461524677968,"score_gpt":0.29437278286917146,"score_spread":0.2817203213444935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412712941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10723955,0.008634122,0.00064997986,0.14442456,0.0021670987,0.00036439413,0.009241337,0.00014290826,0.72713614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4030466,0.0046254043,0.0008942797,0.07849477,0.00015805634,0.0002207522,0.0016963757,0.000073397394,0.51079035],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964629,0.00027045852,0.00009668332,0.0002355104,0.0010766878,0.0018578003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99603516,0.0008350868,0.00008824692,0.00015323107,0.0020211658,0.00086714345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021255163,0.00054205005,0.0004749059,0.0014825976,0.025269825,0.00829944,0.0023713636,0.0073775663,0.019038633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057259016,0.0007746358,0.0005380035,0.0028772398,0.0027868608,0.0013341028,0.0021509512,0.0073100855,0.0016099149],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001370303,0.000088281915,0.02167373,0.00016824613,0.00007760649,0.001481294,0.004915602,0.0006113707,0.0008722466,0.15997183,0.7915897,0.018413093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018204963,0.000053612202,0.08340072,0.0008566401,0.0001736179,0.00040517983,0.023210453,0.001093058,0.0016135512,0.016390199,0.8722951,0.00032594142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091092505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.091092505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27950868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6609255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412788876","doi":"10.1037/cap0000437","title":"The concept of “peoples” in the Canadian Code: Meaning, relevance, and implications for ethical decision making.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Meaning (existential); Code (set theory); Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Management science; Computer science; Philosophy; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.05719902831706223,"score_gpt":0.4117495979913166,"score_spread":0.35455056967425436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412788876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07810118,0.015082094,0.016435318,0.28746393,0.0020262736,0.00016947491,0.0003408333,0.000051809515,0.6003291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97602004,0.0023293023,0.0043316176,0.009067412,0.00014459014,0.00007606579,0.000053566615,0.000042699943,0.007934818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9733146,0.013447426,0.00066510285,0.0012614268,0.008327427,0.002984051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96675706,0.014976795,0.0022530984,0.0015358967,0.010527295,0.0039498867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01731909,0.00060062687,0.00054329203,0.0044776103,0.030477513,0.013054045,0.002552734,0.00548661,0.0036545503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049814373,0.00035298,0.00034344534,0.006558726,0.120056294,0.00934006,0.0068397955,0.008087986,0.00026643876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000095066425,0.000006115093,0.00097577926,0.000039088496,0.000003005845,0.000053202042,0.06358593,0.00005316578,0.0000482511,0.92086613,0.007963216,0.00639647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019234069,0.000015856192,0.009648867,0.0010379554,0.000024920944,0.00021483598,0.17946538,0.0005735774,0.00023688187,0.55825204,0.25039116,0.000119421165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89747804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92546445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102521956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07420792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16085762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53841865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412824182","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5374631","title":"Litigation Abuse in Ontario Family Law Cases","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Family law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.031037050034962616,"score_gpt":0.3106410992733272,"score_spread":0.2796040492383646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412824182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8487623,0.0024269854,0.00023360566,0.016432181,0.0000902569,0.00014598788,0.00069787545,0.000011364382,0.1311994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98056054,0.0013652093,0.00014582355,0.0012823768,0.00003373841,0.000075419724,0.00014628822,0.000009221703,0.016381333],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868859,0.0028190475,0.0006159495,0.0005987634,0.004253997,0.004826319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9648495,0.015723307,0.0057574348,0.0011261427,0.0068501434,0.0056934822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006221791,0.00022229784,0.0005849333,0.0050740684,0.028340127,0.0063810092,0.0020272608,0.0036951713,0.010713915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05289932,0.0007677389,0.00050576933,0.011319735,0.007822078,0.0024563405,0.006103463,0.0024486156,0.00049489],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006575858,0.00033718228,0.4185066,0.000351569,0.00014485637,0.006549725,0.30604064,0.0016319554,0.0005112183,0.14704494,0.07506505,0.043158717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014228713,0.00011535968,0.57708055,0.000710246,0.0001465969,0.0013148044,0.29442102,0.0015760337,0.0004803895,0.011833413,0.11200851,0.00017081916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98252386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99482745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12415654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12415654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1389644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.900823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412920790","doi":"10.1017/hor.2025.10048","title":"<i>Disability Ethics and Preferential Justice: A Catholic Perspective</i>. By Mary Jo Iozzio. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2023. xii + 122 pages. $32.95 (paper).","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Horizons","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Environmental ethics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Theology; Philosophy; Art; Law; Visual arts","score_opus":0.03032442672571763,"score_gpt":0.30768998797606695,"score_spread":0.27736556125034934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412920790","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020869398,0.4146558,0.00045433463,0.3691461,0.0069899024,0.000024789686,0.000107949956,0.000025728077,0.20650841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12775567,0.3423725,0.0011400983,0.055615965,0.0062265536,0.00007002416,0.00016286383,0.000114215014,0.46654204],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957746,0.00019777782,0.000014580111,0.000032057425,0.000103724815,0.00007454506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949074,0.00020797565,0.00005538176,0.000022520979,0.00007374309,0.00014961264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008886005,0.00043755877,0.00021502956,0.0006078134,0.0020526014,0.002722747,0.00044697424,0.0017900459,0.01924979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00162758,0.0003278977,0.00017032947,0.0009291499,0.004422802,0.004586508,0.0019663516,0.0032939357,0.0025777635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001042051,0.000012949034,0.000194705,0.00017079664,0.00000277403,0.00005810337,0.0018649524,0.00003233175,0.000061763065,0.06268571,0.8969146,0.037990954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006188354,0.0000072887988,0.0020924495,0.0008229383,0.0000026249886,0.00016285734,0.0039203526,0.00007238905,0.000043242297,0.029865518,0.96299696,0.000007276193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028951252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08670571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028951252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034864913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033471754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06439698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413105584","doi":"10.32920/29896178","title":"Legislating a Family Law Culture Shift","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.050306143239519874,"score_gpt":0.35492151654987847,"score_spread":0.3046153733103586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413105584","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046017956,0.0040695406,0.011418377,0.77897584,0.004967429,0.00019984251,0.000095082425,0.00018313674,0.15407282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.574105,0.0015414308,0.0050375024,0.3731747,0.0011610956,0.00024383837,0.000049869443,0.0001390025,0.044547558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9772546,0.007387581,0.00071875553,0.00382066,0.0045654895,0.006252878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9729181,0.007448705,0.0016738853,0.0016632715,0.006062703,0.010233408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029773278,0.0005010845,0.00058365526,0.001971598,0.027739473,0.013661532,0.0028705741,0.01142995,0.009548516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02888202,0.00093909306,0.0008130198,0.0010784997,0.033193205,0.009568324,0.0150725,0.019188384,0.0010367472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031761625,0.0001985346,0.0047542723,0.00011216199,0.000041604875,0.0003633044,0.06922709,0.00057556445,0.0014578413,0.7535985,0.12774093,0.04189845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049423837,0.00009221339,0.0039590653,0.00048635766,0.000023274986,0.0001700153,0.0397241,0.00052659167,0.0008746423,0.07509582,0.8788867,0.00011176031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2906171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4086596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2906171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044447064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07297383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57785106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413105585","doi":"10.32920/29896178.v1","title":"Legislating a Family Law Culture Shift","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.050306143239519874,"score_gpt":0.35492151654987847,"score_spread":0.3046153733103586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413105585","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046017956,0.0040695406,0.011418377,0.77897584,0.004967429,0.00019984251,0.000095082425,0.00018313674,0.15407282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.574105,0.0015414308,0.0050375024,0.3731747,0.0011610956,0.00024383837,0.000049869443,0.0001390025,0.044547558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9772546,0.007387581,0.00071875553,0.00382066,0.0045654895,0.006252878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9729181,0.007448705,0.0016738853,0.0016632715,0.006062703,0.010233408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029773278,0.0005010845,0.00058365526,0.001971598,0.027739473,0.013661532,0.0028705741,0.01142995,0.009548516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02888202,0.00093909306,0.0008130198,0.0010784997,0.033193205,0.009568324,0.0150725,0.019188384,0.0010367472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031761625,0.0001985346,0.0047542723,0.00011216199,0.000041604875,0.0003633044,0.06922709,0.00057556445,0.0014578413,0.7535985,0.12774093,0.04189845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049423837,0.00009221339,0.0039590653,0.00048635766,0.000023274986,0.0001700153,0.0397241,0.00052659167,0.0008746423,0.07509582,0.8788867,0.00011176031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2906171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4086596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2906171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044447064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07297383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57785106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413185860","doi":"10.32920/29896847.v1","title":"Tracing the Grounds for Divorce: A Feminist Critique of Canadian Family Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Tracing; Law; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.06137874697865322,"score_gpt":0.35843788373909846,"score_spread":0.29705913676044526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413185860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08664712,0.029603329,0.0069850716,0.26286405,0.00094928447,0.00006158416,0.00034287322,0.00005179382,0.61249495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93840146,0.008441385,0.001696488,0.008850558,0.00018476674,0.000041597406,0.000056572306,0.00006384297,0.042263214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956312,0.0013193787,0.000061979044,0.00034241355,0.0014600847,0.0011849842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709225,0.0012391403,0.00012464305,0.000083315805,0.0011356387,0.00032493862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004240971,0.00051673455,0.00048507834,0.0034294866,0.03839927,0.0092915725,0.0029936626,0.0036033718,0.0054665986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00815395,0.00036442414,0.0004679686,0.0036376195,0.044853084,0.004126092,0.0036158862,0.004978985,0.00027285196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007935536,0.0000053499984,0.00058544846,0.00002739882,0.0000027471438,0.00013266507,0.042503167,0.00025145512,0.000051472194,0.9391713,0.010112759,0.007148238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023862738,0.000010358806,0.0067655924,0.0005569015,0.00002444282,0.00015110192,0.12561148,0.0011051707,0.0002641294,0.22797272,0.6374386,0.000075617594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99372685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99378055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20923723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20923723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12777789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91717273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413185879","doi":"10.32920/29896847","title":"Tracing the Grounds for Divorce: A Feminist Critique of Canadian Family Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Tracing; Law; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06137874697865322,"score_gpt":0.35843788373909846,"score_spread":0.29705913676044526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413185879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08664712,0.029603329,0.0069850716,0.26286405,0.00094928447,0.00006158416,0.00034287322,0.00005179382,0.61249495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93840146,0.008441385,0.001696488,0.008850558,0.00018476674,0.000041597406,0.000056572306,0.00006384297,0.042263214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956312,0.0013193787,0.000061979044,0.00034241355,0.0014600847,0.0011849842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709225,0.0012391403,0.00012464305,0.000083315805,0.0011356387,0.00032493862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004240971,0.00051673455,0.00048507834,0.0034294866,0.03839927,0.0092915725,0.0029936626,0.0036033718,0.0054665986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00815395,0.00036442414,0.0004679686,0.0036376195,0.044853084,0.004126092,0.0036158862,0.004978985,0.00027285196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007935536,0.0000053499984,0.00058544846,0.00002739882,0.0000027471438,0.00013266507,0.042503167,0.00025145512,0.000051472194,0.9391713,0.010112759,0.007148238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023862738,0.000010358806,0.0067655924,0.0005569015,0.00002444282,0.00015110192,0.12561148,0.0011051707,0.0002641294,0.22797272,0.6374386,0.000075617594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99372685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99378055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20923723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20923723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12777789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91717273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413185900","doi":"10.32920/29896214","title":"BC Court of Appeal Recognizes the Myth of False Allegations of Intimate Partner Violence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Mythology; Criminology; Law; Domestic violence; False accusation; Political science; Psychology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Art; Medicine; Medical emergency; Literature","score_opus":0.04732247026385317,"score_gpt":0.3585395966505537,"score_spread":0.3112171263867005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413185900","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062154694,0.003349525,0.0017934699,0.7284394,0.015418093,0.0000943604,0.0004275938,0.00015948327,0.24410264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13042091,0.0020277584,0.0016928215,0.7193103,0.0048725507,0.00018925579,0.00017237573,0.00022660414,0.14108744],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9736525,0.0039503477,0.0016138749,0.0029475773,0.01289081,0.0049448526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9719506,0.015474477,0.0006969856,0.0011583554,0.009234568,0.0014850716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009178283,0.0007119831,0.0014715581,0.0013547041,0.03365736,0.017257467,0.0060486,0.056169618,0.009145406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04975067,0.0013718709,0.0010078475,0.0018307755,0.021666313,0.0051780324,0.0046199677,0.05661882,0.0040695947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025268404,0.000019473948,0.0005863731,0.00007368003,0.000014057628,0.0007864451,0.0057236413,0.00014129732,0.00036515621,0.28739247,0.69677746,0.008094693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028805398,0.000020125524,0.0015537243,0.00045200862,0.000039205126,0.0003346707,0.0038200624,0.000644508,0.0006060413,0.030522594,0.9618527,0.00012551478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70943445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7881521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29056555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03443915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04975895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5845535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413185908","doi":"10.32920/29896211.v1","title":"Torts and Family Violence: Ahluwalia v Ahluwalia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering","score_opus":0.037682647159815306,"score_gpt":0.34701694719423426,"score_spread":0.309334300034419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413185908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03871412,0.038987618,0.0011278039,0.12545395,0.0030855977,0.00043024382,0.00096761854,0.00010128275,0.7911318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43982363,0.024862193,0.0019039211,0.33202383,0.0010681559,0.0006335504,0.00096274255,0.000061169296,0.19866085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975349,0.000294915,0.00012690427,0.00018103339,0.0007599435,0.001102349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853444,0.0005866968,0.00010474733,0.000078815225,0.00033115086,0.00036410097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00267813,0.0002979613,0.00027556194,0.0010521479,0.0067081256,0.0039615794,0.0016080323,0.0060440637,0.008526713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004541763,0.00051724364,0.0006275977,0.000973574,0.0031601875,0.0019642669,0.003239427,0.0074008666,0.0010044001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082898274,0.000121783894,0.0077704866,0.00058876164,0.000041704505,0.001210675,0.00687126,0.00018932942,0.0006144508,0.64202553,0.24184303,0.09864019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006968814,0.00004624741,0.019348925,0.0021777244,0.00008381051,0.0009014596,0.003832455,0.0002524244,0.00040321844,0.023871722,0.94893724,0.00007503818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4510862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6584317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4510862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01215823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052253928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89692116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413185922","doi":"10.32920/29896211","title":"Torts and Family Violence: Ahluwalia v Ahluwalia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering","score_opus":0.037682647159815306,"score_gpt":0.34701694719423426,"score_spread":0.309334300034419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413185922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03871412,0.038987618,0.0011278039,0.12545395,0.0030855977,0.00043024382,0.00096761854,0.00010128275,0.7911318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43982363,0.024862193,0.0019039211,0.33202383,0.0010681559,0.0006335504,0.00096274255,0.000061169296,0.19866085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975349,0.000294915,0.00012690427,0.00018103339,0.0007599435,0.001102349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853444,0.0005866968,0.00010474733,0.000078815225,0.00033115086,0.00036410097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00267813,0.0002979613,0.00027556194,0.0010521479,0.0067081256,0.0039615794,0.0016080323,0.0060440637,0.008526713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004541763,0.00051724364,0.0006275977,0.000973574,0.0031601875,0.0019642669,0.003239427,0.0074008666,0.0010044001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082898274,0.000121783894,0.0077704866,0.00058876164,0.000041704505,0.001210675,0.00687126,0.00018932942,0.0006144508,0.64202553,0.24184303,0.09864019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006968814,0.00004624741,0.019348925,0.0021777244,0.00008381051,0.0009014596,0.003832455,0.0002524244,0.00040321844,0.023871722,0.94893724,0.00007503818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4510862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6584317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4510862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01215823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052253928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89692116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413186145","doi":"10.32920/29896214.v1","title":"BC Court of Appeal Recognizes the Myth of False Allegations of Intimate Partner Violence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Mythology; Criminology; Domestic violence; Law; Political science; Psychology; Art; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency; Literature","score_opus":0.04732247026385317,"score_gpt":0.3585395966505537,"score_spread":0.3112171263867005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413186145","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062154694,0.003349525,0.0017934699,0.7284394,0.015418093,0.0000943604,0.0004275938,0.00015948327,0.24410264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13042091,0.0020277584,0.0016928215,0.7193103,0.0048725507,0.00018925579,0.00017237573,0.00022660414,0.14108744],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9736525,0.0039503477,0.0016138749,0.0029475773,0.01289081,0.0049448526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9719506,0.015474477,0.0006969856,0.0011583554,0.009234568,0.0014850716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009178283,0.0007119831,0.0014715581,0.0013547041,0.03365736,0.017257467,0.0060486,0.056169618,0.009145406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04975067,0.0013718709,0.0010078475,0.0018307755,0.021666313,0.0051780324,0.0046199677,0.05661882,0.0040695947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025268404,0.000019473948,0.0005863731,0.00007368003,0.000014057628,0.0007864451,0.0057236413,0.00014129732,0.00036515621,0.28739247,0.69677746,0.008094693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028805398,0.000020125524,0.0015537243,0.00045200862,0.000039205126,0.0003346707,0.0038200624,0.000644508,0.0006060413,0.030522594,0.9618527,0.00012551478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70943445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7881521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29056555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03443915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04975895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5845535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413465306","doi":"10.29173/mlj1388","title":"Sentencing in Line with Society: R v Bunn and the Manitoba Court of Appeal’s Use of Social Understanding as a Justification for Increased Sentences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Appeal to emotion; Line (geometry); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.07751467632614194,"score_gpt":0.314021018160506,"score_spread":0.23650634183436403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413465306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39298892,0.0044360356,0.0048399,0.29891694,0.0010629725,0.00019387165,0.00014388739,0.00005020808,0.29736722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9459317,0.0009081007,0.0018604296,0.029223999,0.00009543383,0.00007779402,0.000026397676,0.000013482267,0.021862676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99586123,0.0017844081,0.00009162689,0.00034818586,0.0006869819,0.0012275114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99726856,0.0010839754,0.0001761782,0.00013863272,0.00072582054,0.0006068919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064720693,0.00040799804,0.0002984119,0.0007403412,0.022117972,0.0061423345,0.001986408,0.0071159955,0.0018642818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008323592,0.0004890777,0.0004084615,0.00085548236,0.01725732,0.0020542871,0.0040252013,0.00853967,0.00019185121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000475112,0.00006916347,0.008674402,0.000065692824,0.000023741002,0.0025441963,0.07059055,0.00040001364,0.0010886167,0.8839735,0.020922685,0.011599968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019152775,0.00022337944,0.05872703,0.0017889852,0.00024928167,0.0022150173,0.25932327,0.004788043,0.0039912923,0.22104764,0.4469908,0.00046379364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.890827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9659365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04190697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08940278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30405778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413469171","doi":"10.29173/mlj1371","title":"Interview with the Honourable Richard J.F. Chartier","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03245803128657719,"score_gpt":0.29075608973625267,"score_spread":0.25829805844967546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413469171","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010714157,0.010926646,0.00040174578,0.94341433,0.011604342,0.0001096563,0.00044729572,0.00009503402,0.022286857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07505571,0.0067464514,0.00069049076,0.6857106,0.0047152718,0.0002718453,0.00020222347,0.00018198176,0.22642545],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988495,0.0003847249,0.000026347576,0.00014529596,0.0002693765,0.0003248266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954123,0.0012970525,0.00024871246,0.00009706921,0.0015706492,0.0013742485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029415048,0.00064231723,0.00086655177,0.0010341061,0.019290414,0.0029973313,0.0015439227,0.0058657248,0.021538595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010472658,0.00095306215,0.000373103,0.0012303647,0.002442348,0.0025381397,0.0015147192,0.013397759,0.0053057843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024516958,0.000023478282,0.0010522504,0.000028392771,0.0000032948396,0.0005251466,0.0057088295,0.00003328019,0.00014581482,0.0012412991,0.9879319,0.0032817754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013039242,0.000032451688,0.005077658,0.0001313187,0.0000063048246,0.00042415067,0.028896483,0.00011168931,0.00012882987,0.00059825927,0.96453255,0.000047197656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49584913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6605105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50415087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012115677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01108196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9859259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413594117","doi":"10.64628/aa.ayy39hvkw","title":"Unintended, but not unanticipated: coercive control laws will disadvantage First Nations women","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Unintended consequences; Control (management); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.03420607043499752,"score_gpt":0.33581971188662935,"score_spread":0.30161364145163183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413594117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8520544,0.0001945998,0.0005764603,0.017143795,0.00010594424,0.000039219078,0.00018924718,0.000011548336,0.12968475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99093854,0.00010196773,0.0001215366,0.0010850301,0.000020137357,0.00002551414,0.000026130501,0.000004357643,0.007676861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847597,0.00059490144,0.000043230473,0.00014097399,0.00015827383,0.00058667286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994522,0.0029137954,0.0014145571,0.00038981484,0.00031119096,0.0004485926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002182759,0.00019949085,0.0001625108,0.00042667476,0.0019929279,0.0024549188,0.00043300822,0.002312732,0.018534556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012832529,0.00014302878,0.00021149339,0.0003407846,0.0034186451,0.0021218765,0.0014489893,0.0014034704,0.00076978316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041622514,0.00090856117,0.32214695,0.00019092431,0.000101009304,0.0016741889,0.058851518,0.00055208785,0.003144052,0.5194638,0.017175099,0.075375594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026842795,0.00074071105,0.5871492,0.0009374485,0.0002940882,0.0028711404,0.15264148,0.0027262063,0.011957503,0.17190179,0.06836059,0.00015139864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010329712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0129601285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018534556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080179126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018335781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062004328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413802924","doi":"10.29173/mlj1460","title":"Interview with Greg Evans","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer graphics (images); Computer science","score_opus":0.05154963808109951,"score_gpt":0.31978971325719185,"score_spread":0.26824007517609233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413802924","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16022164,0.017596848,0.0020045142,0.7148241,0.009128545,0.001336803,0.0032528148,0.00031369607,0.091321096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37438866,0.013821406,0.0043154964,0.39952344,0.0023646227,0.0062734135,0.0008672503,0.00029163164,0.19815406],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988939,0.00052332797,0.00004241854,0.00013801557,0.00018505196,0.00021734835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964289,0.0013035546,0.00026282034,0.000081733015,0.0009316715,0.0009912882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021842176,0.00067323353,0.001002842,0.0019029595,0.0066191736,0.0016427195,0.00064837665,0.004278765,0.01975689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009619164,0.00067070103,0.0001948698,0.0018530665,0.0019647053,0.002433861,0.0024239004,0.006180571,0.005272561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012995437,0.00018550844,0.0038508284,0.0002182624,0.0000053450244,0.0046172542,0.077553526,0.00006702127,0.0022435363,0.0036610838,0.89132804,0.01613961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031113876,0.00011801697,0.008872474,0.0005661893,0.0000069657153,0.002253915,0.16981639,0.00012754643,0.00031672168,0.0012540709,0.8165838,0.00005278418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027660903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048401713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027660903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038932243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00529966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066093385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803175","doi":"10.29173/mlj1490","title":"Hybridity and Precarious Personhood: Limited Partnerships and Indigenous Economic Development","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Harvard Kennedy School","keywords":"Personhood; Indigenous; General partnership; Colonialism; Context (archaeology); Political science; Intellectual property; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Law; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.05191443147606321,"score_gpt":0.2899043652330947,"score_spread":0.2379899337570315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6873237,0.0020784691,0.003365887,0.016984962,0.000037031397,0.000038490183,0.000033760683,0.000017797553,0.29011992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99541134,0.00023973228,0.00021307859,0.00024855856,0.000001828972,0.000005028693,0.0000026336195,0.000001900412,0.0038759965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728966,0.0008634736,0.00004655974,0.00016596678,0.0004511163,0.0011831879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820924,0.0005751263,0.00023317832,0.000118144,0.00028013517,0.00058416935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019905905,0.00011801526,0.0002182612,0.00072651147,0.016000878,0.005420063,0.0010706481,0.001287704,0.0029342682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003182939,0.0001658935,0.00015491263,0.0010205756,0.036018174,0.002802651,0.0075885016,0.0021845077,0.00009775455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000129565915,0.000020458676,0.012463484,0.000031344145,0.00000617952,0.0011872472,0.11132513,0.00025103134,0.00024808777,0.8621118,0.0009429092,0.01139941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002625413,0.00005332561,0.059308786,0.00062356325,0.000040180563,0.00207597,0.57784915,0.0019863315,0.0007389618,0.17213987,0.18505932,0.00009831428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8285813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9390778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17141873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029316787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034602523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34485644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413834081","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198979937.003.0064","title":"Re Resolution to Amend the Constitution of Canada [1981] 1 SCR 753, Supreme Court of Canada (also known as the Patriation Reference )","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Supreme court; Resolution (logic); Law; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.032225902120052566,"score_gpt":0.23912455451410258,"score_spread":0.20689865239405003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413834081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024771616,0.0092481775,0.00078181183,0.039714523,0.004204862,0.00024096717,0.0015726527,0.00011233996,0.94164735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045998093,0.005795745,0.0019675286,0.049186394,0.00090204895,0.00021254408,0.0008891844,0.00017738936,0.89487106],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919471,0.0005806392,0.00026608683,0.0006097332,0.0046326662,0.0019637581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740976,0.0005070826,0.00012180701,0.00014765379,0.0016058681,0.00020784828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00308691,0.0010423975,0.000652754,0.002762225,0.016465388,0.007737237,0.0032015229,0.014720727,0.016670885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00814138,0.0009504239,0.0008916614,0.0042871516,0.0078026657,0.0021074624,0.0020927994,0.009946382,0.0043742154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009658753,0.000015008384,0.00017858688,0.000043888813,0.000005161888,0.00019043844,0.0014136785,0.00021755722,0.00016614408,0.26972052,0.7216341,0.0064052385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001532289,0.000005762668,0.001172744,0.00021852586,0.000010479621,0.000060229842,0.0008093002,0.000110121306,0.00021091965,0.008479437,0.98886055,0.00004664395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9673227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98548955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9121413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.087858655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12037887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63746214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414593760","doi":"10.18357/jcs501202522466","title":"Childhood and the Law: A Review of Childhood and the Law in Canada: The Family/State Relationship by Patrick Joseph Ryan","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Childhood Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Common law; Family law; Public law","score_opus":0.015240892437582271,"score_gpt":0.2823569469190142,"score_spread":0.26711605448143194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414593760","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017314097,0.9704552,0.00011936813,0.011185764,0.0010771743,0.000016076965,0.00009824751,0.000007425761,0.01530935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018615993,0.9732615,0.00021848816,0.0031943799,0.0003765529,0.0000121499215,0.000074624666,0.000009840329,0.004236473],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762964,0.0002960906,0.00010685786,0.00015241568,0.0012379271,0.00057696947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945387,0.0014096358,0.0002953647,0.000063652406,0.0029953932,0.00069726387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020940744,0.0007882813,0.0010137922,0.0069845445,0.010199779,0.006590836,0.0017588038,0.0028743644,0.0038211169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045811906,0.00052296626,0.00049648725,0.018629776,0.009278374,0.0027425273,0.0018823175,0.0033895322,0.00037651137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005504472,0.00007341491,0.006861686,0.00994783,0.00009451055,0.0011201662,0.028259184,0.00096582505,0.0002825498,0.11993394,0.4940021,0.3384037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037779748,0.000013183737,0.016242407,0.01000153,0.000052499356,0.00040281587,0.012771081,0.00007275854,0.00006778104,0.0026915837,0.9576326,0.000047972142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9879873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.112208895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.112208895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23727705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8141363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414901790","doi":"10.1177/1037969x251385771","title":"When reform kills: The implications of bail reform for First Nations women in Victoria, Australia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternative Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Government (linguistics); Population; Law reform; Project commissioning","score_opus":0.045779454421895384,"score_gpt":0.36942972441256067,"score_spread":0.32365026999066526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414901790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63084257,0.0048076273,0.0005510453,0.28202724,0.0004277742,0.00012696761,0.000050318555,0.000012547672,0.08115399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9565049,0.0015843457,0.00020022209,0.02506971,0.00007790119,0.00007747444,0.000013865335,0.000014988885,0.016456539],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852448,0.005698652,0.00020003396,0.0006151657,0.0012207435,0.0070205876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936977,0.0019260831,0.0010168225,0.00016479078,0.0007353832,0.0024592313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008477564,0.0002503001,0.00064470293,0.0010871326,0.03364949,0.011019067,0.0025754243,0.009439112,0.005768494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019402592,0.00075595325,0.00048130823,0.0012550361,0.025970237,0.008850119,0.013332541,0.015330392,0.0003364992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007466784,0.00015979288,0.014397844,0.00019503373,0.000022510703,0.0028135297,0.6735252,0.0002593107,0.00056483585,0.26713562,0.016619246,0.02423241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002758262,0.00015659872,0.04639544,0.00077265874,0.000027326216,0.00042652225,0.7976207,0.00045982524,0.00030663467,0.02520462,0.12850693,0.00009516853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5649868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69726634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5649868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047845732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05246696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8751501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416019431","doi":"10.21991/cf29505","title":"The Charter’s Forgotten Weapon: Reclaiming Section 28 For Trans Equality","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Identity (music); Legislature; Face (sociological concept); Constitutional law; Constitutional right","score_opus":0.04191491100674879,"score_gpt":0.3275828716107907,"score_spread":0.2856679606040419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416019431","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035766758,0.0025064328,0.03594994,0.47587407,0.008212291,0.00025197727,0.00027767476,0.0004936285,0.44066727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58398056,0.0011520266,0.020033237,0.2398354,0.0016274487,0.00034496834,0.00013804037,0.0004959771,0.15239228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760828,0.0064815674,0.00087668333,0.0030489932,0.009701377,0.0038085894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855223,0.0063819336,0.00075080857,0.0015254569,0.004206079,0.0016134486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022184916,0.0005128713,0.00062320416,0.0009883153,0.010520882,0.013834116,0.0028295775,0.011587227,0.0039698593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034810115,0.0005631963,0.0007441176,0.00069327967,0.031939078,0.0058815707,0.0052311956,0.023321472,0.0010283235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013843953,0.000010611926,0.00020122011,0.000012682777,0.0000027302976,0.00006769165,0.0039445576,0.00014098239,0.00034515254,0.9504405,0.03948525,0.0053347475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000585263,0.000058003654,0.0011087138,0.00025532686,0.00002541029,0.00015377348,0.0044209925,0.00092851656,0.0015244787,0.18023714,0.81110495,0.00012402657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42309043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.486419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9760935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023906503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07625099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84125555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416578883","doi":"10.3366/tal.2025.0625","title":"Old English Psalter Glosses to the Latin Lemmas <i>incola</i> and <i>incolatus</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Translation and Literature","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Jerome's University","funders":"","keywords":"Old English; Variety (cybernetics); Subject (documents); Noun","score_opus":0.017262938701102452,"score_gpt":0.29096714340503455,"score_spread":0.2737042047039321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416578883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2771381,0.01122529,0.022208283,0.00990669,0.0026861345,0.00014421009,0.0024338334,0.0007357152,0.6735217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.920763,0.0036283114,0.005910916,0.0022233662,0.00058226037,0.00009829749,0.0011811992,0.00045228616,0.06516027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995247,0.00018361537,0.00006339861,0.00006419813,0.00011245418,0.00005161713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983773,0.000663737,0.00035594974,0.0001711943,0.0003588621,0.000072945506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075604906,0.0004883694,0.00025791812,0.001381541,0.0012073405,0.0013390675,0.00043753625,0.00038574648,0.011787549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019503088,0.00014488724,0.0001649918,0.0021242546,0.00280613,0.002123914,0.0013644367,0.0013852102,0.0027587018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030358066,0.00008617145,0.009302405,0.0031626637,0.000037159276,0.0020117783,0.20938045,0.00023693377,0.0235383,0.49637252,0.1111334,0.14443463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017460552,0.000090605616,0.018569121,0.00075123686,0.00002832398,0.0017296757,0.039754715,0.00036407245,0.0043632924,0.010562668,0.9237206,0.00004826266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004656714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010736788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011787549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001280507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069534313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0394333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416889372","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5811862","title":"Constitutional Statutes are 'Always Speaking'","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Statutory interpretation; Statutory law; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional law","score_opus":0.02643328226768535,"score_gpt":0.3234745874112813,"score_spread":0.29704130514359595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416889372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014193295,0.0015398883,0.02479439,0.04724644,0.002907772,0.000094364856,0.00084023585,0.00035891146,0.90802455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78372216,0.0014300521,0.013124736,0.036354747,0.0025373749,0.0005767789,0.00089643314,0.0005592919,0.16079849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97076494,0.008929562,0.0014855011,0.0046152836,0.01033095,0.0038737513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96619976,0.017784627,0.0024490329,0.0076662414,0.0051343767,0.0007659171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016516112,0.0005243946,0.001332416,0.0018332632,0.007206151,0.015160721,0.0025976608,0.009322679,0.015792111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060519766,0.0013040631,0.00061675167,0.0027970008,0.021245066,0.012073516,0.0039196033,0.015890643,0.005250061],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003776204,0.0000050657136,0.00006820307,0.000013485399,0.000003629013,0.000008401446,0.0007445006,0.000022300173,0.00003114029,0.98824084,0.008668737,0.0021899885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031127754,0.000015453625,0.0009751788,0.00024031368,0.000043430297,0.00008012378,0.0015989408,0.00022722105,0.00052901567,0.78643775,0.20977691,0.000044514694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0086667305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011179765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016516112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038657351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007668302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087346554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416942283","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5740482","title":"Mapping the Limitations of the Notwithstanding Clause: The Primary Documents.ca Drafting History for Section 33 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Opposition (politics); Negotiation; Government (linguistics); Sovereignty","score_opus":0.04144710157014613,"score_gpt":0.27014862729606987,"score_spread":0.22870152572592373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416942283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013340959,0.008059731,0.005272191,0.08783433,0.0021419607,0.0005750222,0.007785186,0.00026471043,0.87472594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30248037,0.0068378607,0.013477925,0.03498824,0.0006256858,0.00062376173,0.003588067,0.0006669426,0.6367111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864494,0.0014050629,0.00045125114,0.001268381,0.006998229,0.0034276415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981968,0.0044772113,0.0005303177,0.0012664115,0.010988224,0.0007698286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011125034,0.00081332977,0.00063364423,0.004990832,0.021079527,0.014920653,0.0039035548,0.0076753437,0.03226383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031944416,0.0012647791,0.0007166902,0.006287974,0.0063195457,0.004863684,0.0028019247,0.010397583,0.0025362354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030929656,0.000014135276,0.000699823,0.00015628988,0.000008337459,0.00009849618,0.005317866,0.0002136592,0.00027911496,0.6820785,0.28878152,0.022321451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000134038155,0.0000075091784,0.0036780087,0.00056510326,0.000027343262,0.00002681506,0.00248348,0.00023693305,0.000550498,0.015142415,0.9772,0.0000686311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98789716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9906549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.897401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.102599055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26438415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7444117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416970814","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5700162","title":"The Drafting History of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislation; Bill of rights; Human rights; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.012259553868012918,"score_gpt":0.2489789977643971,"score_spread":0.2367194438963842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416970814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02891692,0.017927153,0.008086148,0.14864185,0.006377143,0.00039115277,0.0016440623,0.00024765733,0.787768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57074785,0.01199238,0.0145200705,0.027708506,0.0015126419,0.00028242572,0.0007221787,0.00054706703,0.37196684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97556585,0.0038442248,0.000883216,0.002600106,0.011722714,0.005383885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96851826,0.006317495,0.000694265,0.0018420971,0.020249149,0.0023786959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018468527,0.0010817456,0.0011164806,0.007960956,0.032527324,0.018409448,0.0035261905,0.008126807,0.010384879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042226758,0.0013387059,0.0009568581,0.009750085,0.02549646,0.0043838136,0.004553422,0.012841073,0.0008225345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023205355,0.000015214918,0.00035713162,0.00006687232,0.000010336739,0.00010233548,0.0081969015,0.00067246385,0.00015566144,0.88116056,0.0863728,0.02286654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016970333,0.000012446928,0.0033224763,0.00035808544,0.000022116858,0.00003771854,0.0026983954,0.00055183104,0.0003664192,0.028723983,0.96376306,0.00012643525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99408287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99499255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27547243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27547243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4135157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8403493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416989084","doi":"10.1515/9781779400673-022","title":"On the Illegitimacy of the Canadian Constitutional Order","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Regina Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Constitution; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.03809268504480884,"score_gpt":0.23557727935119926,"score_spread":0.19748459430639043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416989084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010778141,0.007003869,0.0011123347,0.034365915,0.00039417166,0.00003745654,0.00019014471,0.000024587473,0.9460934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.717017,0.0077181254,0.0020383652,0.009650665,0.00036060766,0.0000867119,0.00013797551,0.00012485322,0.26286566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947733,0.00092239253,0.00007703597,0.00043981784,0.0018087698,0.0019786095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967656,0.0012201037,0.000101369114,0.00021793212,0.0013468774,0.00034814727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003676554,0.0005581952,0.00061069475,0.0032984351,0.02421376,0.014348517,0.0021801135,0.004113592,0.013126983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0104996925,0.0006859877,0.00041056413,0.0048451982,0.03703951,0.0044897418,0.0024769197,0.007057407,0.0008123697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050409003,0.000002833182,0.00007501667,0.000008378733,0.0000013712138,0.000023048538,0.0021308693,0.000113373826,0.000017628752,0.9818971,0.0128782,0.0028471914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023895931,0.000006769661,0.0028204583,0.00028975704,0.000023126873,0.000058454127,0.0074990587,0.0006671684,0.00015973026,0.4425728,0.545812,0.00006667749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9893227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14056243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14056243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15002072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99682575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416998280","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5817042","title":"The Challenge of Relocation Applications under the New Divorce Act for Mothers and Victims of Family Violence: A Critical Comment on Friesen v Friesen (Saskatchewan Court of Appeal)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Context (archaeology); Child custody; Best interests; Family law","score_opus":0.023216592721652437,"score_gpt":0.3411031756190445,"score_spread":0.3178865828973921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416998280","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008411719,0.0015199645,0.00024276075,0.9703855,0.0035725269,0.0000583466,0.00010224651,0.00002467767,0.01568224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036335398,0.000962959,0.0003008002,0.9380647,0.0022769656,0.00012395626,0.000033301436,0.00007210095,0.021829808],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97176695,0.008653832,0.0023220757,0.0037125759,0.004949832,0.008594734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8933515,0.08459611,0.0027246703,0.0026333227,0.009822715,0.0068716705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03942258,0.0011847556,0.002353159,0.0020362525,0.048878677,0.020177362,0.0165208,0.14022712,0.010705923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0841309,0.0029995162,0.0028597044,0.0026851834,0.03372429,0.012279659,0.010684959,0.13397995,0.0029940358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013655482,0.00008407637,0.0027690988,0.00018759072,0.00010308514,0.0036924097,0.07320087,0.00032740508,0.0006245282,0.18664125,0.7230405,0.009192537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023580101,0.00009732045,0.00898011,0.0027641607,0.00028628876,0.0009930254,0.1689468,0.0006980699,0.0012746894,0.040641073,0.77448034,0.0006023406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6737987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8126192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32620132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04871001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12265828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65624475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417194340","doi":"10.7202/1119727ar","title":"The Fight for Substantive Equality: Women's Activism and Section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Section (typography); Principal (computer security); Bill of rights; Ex post facto law; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.10497055886347433,"score_gpt":0.3857010617955144,"score_spread":0.28073050293204005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417194340","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0979412,0.012385061,0.002482163,0.24647523,0.0018773364,0.00011552182,0.0000913574,0.000031688676,0.6386004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9306217,0.0027508321,0.0010916527,0.021447763,0.00025068666,0.000058960777,0.00003177309,0.00003283812,0.043713782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98344135,0.0042113154,0.00024596052,0.0010939391,0.004959167,0.006048244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928797,0.0035786128,0.0004938148,0.0002621598,0.0013124276,0.001473348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013485056,0.0004098477,0.0005448161,0.0017456972,0.040331114,0.016670238,0.0023959079,0.0060733673,0.0034957214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014833969,0.00038598778,0.00037733957,0.0022848644,0.06706968,0.004042026,0.0077566374,0.009830961,0.00017952197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015452055,0.000015173084,0.0006423166,0.000037360594,0.000003577849,0.00012916324,0.0948653,0.00009448314,0.00020331703,0.87536365,0.0154841775,0.013146008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028419465,0.000027294083,0.006703439,0.00047382855,0.000018539711,0.00008185473,0.13650759,0.000261656,0.00058586174,0.09835311,0.7568652,0.00009309421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95833004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9739886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09404897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09404897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1865912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68237627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417283522","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5895562","title":"Critical Conversations in Canadian Public Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; York University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Public law; Scholarship; Indigenous; Critical legal studies; Queer; Bridging (networking); Critical race theory; Law reform","score_opus":0.02809084947294429,"score_gpt":0.33848258670255627,"score_spread":0.310391737229612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417283522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15144788,0.009452695,0.0015303107,0.23194717,0.0011754922,0.000094065435,0.0004012067,0.00009689536,0.60385424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93952364,0.0015607951,0.00041597057,0.009114367,0.00016510519,0.00005157363,0.00006659684,0.00007478671,0.0490272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98068583,0.006524771,0.0003395581,0.0014867123,0.0042569884,0.0067060157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9631853,0.02124185,0.0012837803,0.0010322471,0.007680339,0.005576477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015749855,0.0008624841,0.00092201895,0.00690427,0.10522753,0.033784058,0.0038755825,0.012679184,0.026671873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054570537,0.00090002426,0.0005442944,0.011190217,0.04640239,0.012582994,0.010719567,0.013162259,0.0010119544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046862126,0.000038467933,0.0015566333,0.00007648905,0.000011932368,0.00034568633,0.23368663,0.0002434832,0.00008455495,0.68730384,0.06617269,0.010432703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033160733,0.000012728021,0.0071228826,0.00049649534,0.00003172429,0.0001172526,0.38444299,0.0005746809,0.00028446052,0.10089138,0.5058642,0.00012811825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9915319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9918703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3179261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3179261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29063684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.791109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W49242073","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal Rights: Creating Disincentives to Negotiate: Mitchell v. M.N.R.'S Potential Effect on Dispute Resolution","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Negotiation; Treaty; Context (archaeology); Justiciability; Duty; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.0060738624323630665,"score_gpt":0.2947476599063553,"score_spread":0.28867379747399224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W49242073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27513388,0.0046554664,0.001577979,0.1817385,0.0003475252,0.00008240195,0.000036098445,0.000033458215,0.5363947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9526248,0.0016227517,0.001149893,0.015496888,0.00014976716,0.00006556609,0.0000083893865,0.000014225756,0.028867688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99234515,0.0024874317,0.00015260809,0.00047474695,0.0022018224,0.0023382062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99387664,0.0036821722,0.000711036,0.00020561062,0.0005755372,0.0009490579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054364926,0.00027009906,0.0003049184,0.00084762264,0.027480526,0.0066699237,0.0016045688,0.0077963043,0.002454808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014018739,0.00037022243,0.00035393744,0.00089667144,0.014368269,0.003067147,0.0057356115,0.006592182,0.00024539942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050069353,0.000035659225,0.0037348084,0.000077280936,0.000008114113,0.0030054238,0.08847158,0.00027195836,0.00060754985,0.86809963,0.020042269,0.015595628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017810358,0.00017667645,0.028023664,0.00093486265,0.00012937802,0.0038592666,0.13387059,0.0021653592,0.0022893362,0.22522286,0.60293263,0.00021720737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6579414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79751194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3420586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02102292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028536998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6881461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W49562361","doi":"","title":"Философия Г. В. Ф. Гегеля и теория правового государства Ч. Тейлора","year":2009,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Известия Российского государственного педагогического университета им. А. И. Герцена","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Philosophy; Enlightenment; Opposition (politics); Romanticism; Law; German; Criticism; Philosophy of law; Epistemology; Public law; Political science; Art history; History","score_opus":0.036487285038902556,"score_gpt":0.33317481799117926,"score_spread":0.2966875329522767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W49562361","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021113457,0.008824451,0.02387289,0.013016798,0.0012163221,0.00010498385,0.00027257472,0.000117483636,0.931461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7184639,0.008798942,0.021571929,0.0017169684,0.0005556662,0.00016069935,0.00020244389,0.00008977535,0.24843964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993444,0.00016114936,0.00002960901,0.00009689487,0.0002878645,0.00008005824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948764,0.0001707338,0.00007364615,0.00005491294,0.00017113464,0.000041941625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087985385,0.0002300873,0.00014160175,0.0009245749,0.002255362,0.003381766,0.00026227534,0.00082270737,0.011181352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016462432,0.00021502773,0.00020481268,0.0009710121,0.00493237,0.0014149836,0.0007406905,0.0017246101,0.0036394638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007144595,0.0000066600155,0.00023931579,0.000032856988,0.0000027898702,0.00006221203,0.0012986525,0.00008727355,0.00032936895,0.97662556,0.004123598,0.017184582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008867442,0.000026415766,0.0016215907,0.000109178756,0.000013638582,0.00026809567,0.0015711713,0.0002862982,0.0011509771,0.3642605,0.6306622,0.000021052092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011787455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015984258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011787455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002858757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033787184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03740537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W560033622","doi":"","title":"Walking With Henri Nouwen: A Reflective Journey","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Portrait; Beauty; Art; Iconography; Horseback riding; Art history; Psychoanalysis; Literature; Aesthetics; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04015691765336772,"score_gpt":0.32932391467478583,"score_spread":0.2891669970214181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W560033622","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045667924,0.11826373,0.0060348064,0.6099786,0.06764563,0.00039109855,0.00012628686,0.0003939198,0.15149802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31083745,0.053828917,0.013877851,0.17038903,0.011834825,0.0007812147,0.00014412626,0.0012434049,0.4370632],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877007,0.007850782,0.00023775121,0.00094486744,0.00215751,0.0011084557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922471,0.0032534662,0.00046080045,0.0003873851,0.0009739906,0.0026772826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009549828,0.0013447887,0.0013716663,0.0013112057,0.02253161,0.016165987,0.002849625,0.0058498858,0.006777428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02239191,0.0011165412,0.0006468278,0.001569032,0.015630899,0.012725397,0.010212114,0.017236734,0.003044157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043949127,0.00032002944,0.00035994902,0.00022172263,0.000020514753,0.0017998327,0.44317666,0.00017525916,0.0009746608,0.06950765,0.4387704,0.044629436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039166644,0.000042169875,0.00014154328,0.00042847625,0.000003333528,0.0005444662,0.13344672,0.00008191083,0.0001363638,0.005538415,0.8595972,0.000035609282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015920999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024851305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02253161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005800299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01161186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050504923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W561963998","doi":"","title":"Kent: Diocese of Canterbury ed. by James M. Gibson (review)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Classics","score_opus":0.009587483938067135,"score_gpt":0.24427150279728743,"score_spread":0.2346840188592203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W561963998","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004037342,0.99483526,0.000024283416,0.0026244218,0.0007330265,0.000004225217,0.0001150418,0.000008918678,0.001614431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009480468,0.9898123,0.00008088109,0.0009812751,0.00038789428,0.000024663761,0.00016008026,0.000013392213,0.007591448],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986089,0.00030441923,0.00016880145,0.00015948288,0.000571286,0.00018715952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99555415,0.0010943289,0.000888369,0.00013474238,0.0016551971,0.00067326485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024095192,0.0022279,0.0043550692,0.0073392754,0.0024146722,0.005709295,0.0031898043,0.003213553,0.07052642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007859573,0.0014273342,0.0010082715,0.01620814,0.002783117,0.006072472,0.002981007,0.0027106032,0.01637967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083109306,0.000016125694,0.00029379534,0.010475562,0.000049474056,0.00014379817,0.0003088847,0.000098034165,0.00009874087,0.0018967334,0.78071976,0.20581594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018588235,0.000018142648,0.0025502923,0.015834665,0.000060589162,0.00023847619,0.0006025826,0.000021003372,0.00005041875,0.0006968727,0.97987753,0.000030788695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27480057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4623156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27480057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010481081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023073426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5464021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W562484688","doi":"","title":"1980-1982 Advocacy to Amend the Canadian Charter of Rights to Protect Disability Equality","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04070614098366927,"score_gpt":0.3374445379415789,"score_spread":0.29673839695790966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W562484688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032882433,0.0110683115,0.001560879,0.21188688,0.0066306973,0.0001701403,0.00032144217,0.00006357903,0.7354157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.337716,0.0068875686,0.0021196892,0.055761263,0.0007159019,0.00012227902,0.0001878719,0.000066787106,0.5964226],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99379903,0.00066503586,0.00008135723,0.00031120033,0.0028663636,0.0022769682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970022,0.0008256464,0.000102898084,0.00006687225,0.0012102379,0.00079213345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038226473,0.0004578319,0.00028966359,0.0012501272,0.024498804,0.0042262785,0.0010715736,0.005372553,0.0072913277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008267183,0.00037251695,0.00028518168,0.0015236652,0.011719981,0.0016453501,0.0030190255,0.007399882,0.0008665757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049031205,0.000045649314,0.0018881368,0.00010735997,0.0000058252517,0.0004143227,0.027566753,0.00022096335,0.0006133184,0.35715884,0.5775174,0.034412395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011298645,0.000011962417,0.0037356187,0.000110235276,0.000004746302,0.000059569644,0.007740751,0.00008503696,0.0002732427,0.004804478,0.98313373,0.000029440977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9700313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9925823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091445744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.091445744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10910494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6634884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W565890685","doi":"10.5860/choice.41-0568","title":"The Myth of the sacred: the charter, the courts, and the politics of the constitution in Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Politics; Mythology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.03333691860169268,"score_gpt":0.3108211969005495,"score_spread":0.2774842782988568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W565890685","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08333318,0.068677254,0.0010804294,0.46857083,0.0012114577,0.00006778823,0.00040325138,0.000035777968,0.37662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90735614,0.019443825,0.0005526926,0.027246606,0.0003391507,0.00003522332,0.00009003644,0.00006185116,0.04487452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933363,0.0011791508,0.00008733583,0.00044057064,0.0020510412,0.002905517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99390805,0.0025532653,0.00028702657,0.00013354202,0.0020753506,0.0010427103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040012263,0.00039089515,0.00063155906,0.0028955252,0.04626757,0.023486553,0.0023870934,0.0072725313,0.0066715884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012265318,0.00041698714,0.00038851806,0.005663484,0.038851637,0.005440872,0.003502683,0.009128458,0.00031800286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029080795,0.00001894483,0.0017814037,0.00009123966,0.000013292374,0.00024574285,0.033998717,0.0005093552,0.000108769476,0.8759217,0.074896276,0.012385532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045194123,0.000024456573,0.015217504,0.0009536892,0.000076640026,0.0001594626,0.120955214,0.0009839222,0.00039004473,0.15567666,0.7053251,0.00019202547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22651404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22651404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32288757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89713407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W570479127","doi":"10.3138/9781442686007","title":"Parliamentary Democracy in Crisis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Democracy; Law; Duty; Constitutional crisis; Governor; Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02553492946148992,"score_gpt":0.2588360971326202,"score_spread":0.23330116767113027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W570479127","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012203748,0.076562,0.00048744516,0.53832686,0.03247708,0.000029896462,0.0003164764,0.00016672554,0.3504131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07683915,0.037915558,0.0006165194,0.1047797,0.020212898,0.000102923426,0.00038273388,0.00035264037,0.7587978],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975037,0.0008087268,0.0000914755,0.00026037928,0.00081884366,0.00051698525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978218,0.00052833965,0.000120186145,0.0001574919,0.0005407822,0.0008315303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017214377,0.00043482383,0.000439749,0.00092327734,0.0059570465,0.008925313,0.0009469665,0.00490782,0.08465043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069801863,0.00029665657,0.00025666776,0.001366781,0.0039832536,0.0056654555,0.00413912,0.005922108,0.017995583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009167772,0.000012140902,0.00011227937,0.00005895461,0.0000011895049,0.000033632452,0.0009914112,0.00003711263,0.000044611752,0.08682449,0.89596534,0.015909731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014013789,0.0000014045472,0.00014823761,0.00011952134,3.1057445e-7,0.00001370641,0.0006493867,0.000010751033,0.000013128535,0.0058450736,0.9931952,0.000001948199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027926004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0355253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08465043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008427804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011426243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28318387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W570861621","doi":"10.14288/1.0417313","title":"Catholic schools in Western Canada : their legal status","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic growth; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.0245903456253999,"score_gpt":0.28773296389444175,"score_spread":0.26314261826904184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W570861621","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17325753,0.115167536,0.00026728856,0.079727516,0.0016940201,0.00018781796,0.01248652,0.00018960323,0.6170222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60107493,0.055722527,0.0011035901,0.007926133,0.00031580147,0.00010654534,0.0035987583,0.00011511546,0.33003655],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982951,0.00011337544,0.000048439855,0.00009568444,0.0005566306,0.00089073845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964005,0.00013556278,0.00023755844,0.000051999312,0.0017644605,0.0014099082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009745019,0.0002988686,0.00028200072,0.0045950366,0.012832396,0.004192627,0.0013091791,0.0008767023,0.022491036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002637277,0.00027199922,0.00016652491,0.010707003,0.0026839874,0.00094715465,0.002235095,0.0011407644,0.001341335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078883015,0.00008733027,0.0483809,0.00079723133,0.000013789998,0.00070690556,0.048226066,0.00009400272,0.00028046317,0.09794914,0.5235215,0.27986377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000921743,0.000006969282,0.10449913,0.0007481271,0.00000863459,0.0001454527,0.022359427,0.000042265292,0.00005204489,0.00080557214,0.8713047,0.000018406776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9902085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06465265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06465265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14727503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46908998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W571975644","doi":"","title":"Canadian cases in the philosophy of law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Charter; Autonomy; Tort","score_opus":0.0708248539646352,"score_gpt":0.3284996902155102,"score_spread":0.25767483625087495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W571975644","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007189342,0.014814562,0.00082088774,0.045935478,0.0030476882,0.00007484271,0.00029349062,0.00009043273,0.92773336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1660781,0.018482616,0.003065456,0.028560696,0.00080921385,0.000096816286,0.00036222118,0.0001816012,0.78236324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947148,0.00051728764,0.00009923268,0.0003205263,0.0031868469,0.0011612674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764204,0.00061756384,0.00005605376,0.000109442735,0.0012288454,0.0003460465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022848055,0.0006830283,0.00036098112,0.0028545817,0.022188107,0.007986834,0.0022096026,0.0040181554,0.014446847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005171341,0.00043679719,0.00063519855,0.0044226255,0.0132497465,0.0028678323,0.0029859277,0.004682938,0.0013831748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007789571,0.000012172854,0.00024173371,0.00008622775,0.0000036076863,0.0005211882,0.007512611,0.0001820603,0.00013429804,0.5158642,0.4596177,0.015816355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032558873,0.0000021201179,0.00060052454,0.00009304383,0.000004229083,0.00013935735,0.002476402,0.00010188739,0.000068782116,0.009305067,0.9871876,0.000017681648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9807279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99168783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15505742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15505742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.109842025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9800136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W572475526","doi":"","title":"Women, Social Assistance and the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02255582569104898,"score_gpt":0.26201894253028374,"score_spread":0.23946311683923477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W572475526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2098526,0.029333279,0.0004343197,0.34339756,0.0014240877,0.00013085378,0.000839888,0.000046111054,0.4145413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86711323,0.0063748015,0.0003262518,0.038815442,0.00029296175,0.00008780902,0.00014241574,0.000053471842,0.08679361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98937804,0.001186663,0.00016137576,0.00063232344,0.0021530727,0.0064885295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854101,0.004734099,0.00072034815,0.0002606746,0.0038735883,0.0050012544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056269127,0.0005151061,0.0010724519,0.0031602085,0.07740425,0.0204389,0.0036264516,0.011907866,0.018757029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021187214,0.0007717939,0.0005472174,0.005987991,0.019299699,0.0042821206,0.0065242546,0.013411727,0.0005558237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013022326,0.000096942,0.011382884,0.00018357576,0.00006219424,0.0007514377,0.03725004,0.0005148937,0.00021339706,0.7789971,0.14833811,0.02207916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017698196,0.000057036817,0.049958184,0.0013757545,0.00017401412,0.00024155436,0.12869103,0.0008456295,0.0004886028,0.09393463,0.7237315,0.0003249468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99636495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21647637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21647637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36659113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90877634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W573285099","doi":"","title":"女性たちの NPO 活動 : カナダの女性たちの教育活動 NPO の実践","year":2002,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Kanagawa University Repository (Kanagawa University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.021032121669489055,"score_gpt":0.20065288989604593,"score_spread":0.17962076822655687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W573285099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010383681,0.006288598,0.0066069826,0.019271487,0.005140613,0.00032036737,0.0003733844,0.0003081557,0.9513067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.056822766,0.0030999316,0.004118237,0.007835374,0.00038613525,0.00016146894,0.00027216837,0.00023450346,0.9270694],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753594,0.00022861405,0.00012929278,0.00034933162,0.0013112053,0.00044562615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986571,0.00016052701,0.000066326415,0.00007325209,0.00079004146,0.0002527389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001812627,0.00044401368,0.0002638011,0.00057456025,0.008753146,0.0050590094,0.00066292734,0.0024189844,0.031497788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025154087,0.00047271806,0.0002750388,0.0007170882,0.004910918,0.0037365435,0.0026469221,0.0046461993,0.012937043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007658319,0.00007961342,0.0023507695,0.00031208043,0.0000066003945,0.0007521787,0.028053926,0.00010999147,0.0028129285,0.28480873,0.51213324,0.1685034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018899154,0.000009534732,0.0009670412,0.000047170226,0.000001855117,0.000080126316,0.0016793603,0.000028611443,0.00040565574,0.0014712475,0.99529666,0.000010851955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20741802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29493505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.792582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008814449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01459297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4124214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W588271392","doi":"","title":"Husband and wife and matrimonial law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Entomology and Zoology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Law; Commonwealth; Subject (documents); Table of contents; Section (typography); English law; Common law; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.01712667770689813,"score_gpt":0.31473086270743367,"score_spread":0.29760418500053554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W588271392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017944131,0.026511077,0.00066689623,0.027653,0.0011659063,0.000018092782,0.00019071069,0.000042264495,0.92580783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5609582,0.01488581,0.0006384051,0.012432694,0.0011368414,0.000038746974,0.00015733419,0.000042600015,0.40970936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985141,0.0006866421,0.000061650324,0.00011968667,0.00029314082,0.00032470236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903786,0.0003844019,0.00010053591,0.00009032347,0.0001600137,0.0002268656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012700568,0.00015843697,0.00022626497,0.000711393,0.0035244953,0.0043662363,0.00039226387,0.0011339632,0.020058194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004576507,0.00019641398,0.00010205315,0.0009962351,0.0033185743,0.0021644158,0.0020063452,0.0010710367,0.0033996482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024660294,0.000022129898,0.0026424942,0.00007427656,0.00000445376,0.0011740016,0.01591,0.00005119951,0.0000932307,0.7330888,0.21110691,0.03580783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039425086,0.00001642098,0.0026049088,0.00027891755,0.0000027544127,0.0005209266,0.005518722,0.00005529247,0.00007290655,0.02630153,0.96461695,0.00000668837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012081715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02397102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020058194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002981118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017890101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0671013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W589555638","doi":"","title":"修復的司法の動向(5)カナダ法律委員会「尊厳の回復」--原文名: Law Commission of Canada, Restoring Dignity: Responding to Child Abuse in Canadian Institutions(2000)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"法律時報","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Commission; Law; Political science; Child abuse; Criminology; Sociology; Poison control; Medicine; Suicide prevention; Environmental health","score_opus":0.042858529255995065,"score_gpt":0.3145350752367975,"score_spread":0.2716765459808025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W589555638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05110172,0.013823275,0.001992523,0.3122371,0.0026239613,0.00019771294,0.0004433045,0.000068272915,0.617512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64183265,0.0062038684,0.0027380676,0.11344932,0.00090259686,0.00014399206,0.000147373,0.000056910838,0.23452522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997256,0.00030342894,0.0001004148,0.00022429912,0.0010137135,0.0011021601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958033,0.0010189422,0.00032682277,0.000096112395,0.0018857461,0.0008691594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002648806,0.0003783552,0.00020491818,0.0014160447,0.021275375,0.0077529945,0.0015454649,0.010704529,0.009265947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008822919,0.00038554464,0.00046870255,0.0017202188,0.014825086,0.003232211,0.0022310503,0.0076732705,0.0010430734],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026259395,0.00007586547,0.009651273,0.00017082598,0.000023328963,0.00075430627,0.072689354,0.00020309538,0.00048579444,0.54824364,0.32483056,0.04284573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020088057,0.000036705755,0.029323298,0.000386399,0.000060706865,0.0003110639,0.05896212,0.00016870884,0.0009977216,0.043000832,0.86663276,0.00009957658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9295186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97430134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9659102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034089833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07101295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2473402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W591305737","doi":"","title":"Thoughts on ... 'exorcising' gay marriage; Medjugorje; Toronto's troubles","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exorcism; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Theology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.039364246968826545,"score_gpt":0.32822268044661584,"score_spread":0.2888584334777893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W591305737","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003695034,0.014267195,0.00009344795,0.9451299,0.00468873,0.000018054017,0.00007814326,0.000027471575,0.032002017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2802825,0.041566752,0.0006421207,0.4980265,0.014632848,0.00015045708,0.00013973011,0.00010121365,0.16445783],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871504,0.000430002,0.00004223078,0.000099384924,0.00023839452,0.00047494587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971616,0.000998576,0.00029660467,0.00006841623,0.0002910007,0.0011838716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001719815,0.0007009048,0.00040536775,0.0012163116,0.020760419,0.004309089,0.003046747,0.012560104,0.016762322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005008335,0.00048490014,0.00044104562,0.0016645581,0.022916412,0.0034349945,0.0030363235,0.009978745,0.0009846893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014524526,0.000022248552,0.0018179428,0.00011967316,0.000006007593,0.0025160846,0.03205673,0.00012025068,0.0000889338,0.043703277,0.91018516,0.009349119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020416044,0.000025030988,0.0069673406,0.0006376644,0.000012361294,0.0016369856,0.09857704,0.000107527805,0.00007064972,0.009576622,0.8823161,0.000052216896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72862417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8797154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27137583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025716987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015099169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.545948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W59436585","doi":"","title":"Universality vs. Particularity: Litigating Middle Class Values under Section 15","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Class (philosophy); Political science; Universality (dynamical systems); Section (typography); Ask price; Preference; Middle class; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Mathematics; Business; Statistics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0414437799937484,"score_gpt":0.2897674056415472,"score_spread":0.24832362564779878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W59436585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29939798,0.006343027,0.007009466,0.058416944,0.0005464908,0.00018068851,0.00032247603,0.000059584803,0.6277233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9651115,0.0009851957,0.0008132445,0.016610777,0.00017087921,0.000051791874,0.000052029798,0.000016062653,0.016188642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98050505,0.002404865,0.00055236596,0.001993461,0.005786187,0.008758084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890491,0.0063585555,0.00086643215,0.00068996684,0.0018210843,0.0012147956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012392447,0.00041905767,0.0009777979,0.0017442121,0.018341156,0.011174769,0.0029050868,0.010379171,0.004247712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019884158,0.000505725,0.0010904637,0.0020791967,0.02625814,0.0038965882,0.0071724355,0.009968368,0.00029085108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027611453,0.000026123656,0.0061098305,0.00005143153,0.000036607293,0.0008672452,0.011635947,0.00023061797,0.00024352259,0.96766895,0.0058991993,0.007203026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015534127,0.00015268927,0.04712142,0.0018702609,0.0005241266,0.0019898536,0.048803926,0.0023524282,0.0044631497,0.45781547,0.4344566,0.00029471735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72382355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8018941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72382355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031299785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042153005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55560577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W597048075","doi":"10.1017/9780585490809.008","title":"Where did all the Charters Go? Anglo-Saxon Charters and the New Politics of the Eleventh Century","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eleventh; Demise; Quarter (Canadian coin); Politics; History; Anglo saxon; Ancient history; Political science; Archaeology; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.01959419157782072,"score_gpt":0.26467809340827453,"score_spread":0.2450839018304538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W597048075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2632578,0.026462797,0.001218882,0.07022135,0.0014324618,0.000025223722,0.00012771507,0.000060672843,0.6371931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8898704,0.0047942433,0.00045570434,0.002500707,0.00039444224,0.000018814915,0.00004597763,0.000030879048,0.10188898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981787,0.0009061452,0.000068690286,0.00015957648,0.00024000567,0.00044686606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986644,0.00046906882,0.00024351614,0.00011118402,0.00019482592,0.00031704022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025222267,0.0002630484,0.00020411614,0.0010449681,0.011404273,0.011973807,0.0004976663,0.0011793043,0.0049777357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024124219,0.00019562825,0.000102083126,0.001418868,0.017438766,0.00474843,0.0020021705,0.0038742318,0.0006713597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030798277,0.000014321081,0.0010597626,0.000035834863,0.00000204255,0.00011222252,0.07825403,0.00008648668,0.00008936475,0.89538455,0.012950679,0.011979956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001627158,0.00003477055,0.0070003793,0.00047199527,0.000006358014,0.00011149457,0.070079975,0.00017012584,0.00027145696,0.043804284,0.87799,0.000042903648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031049103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051563893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031049103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01045477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037507422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07585508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W602390078","doi":"","title":"Constitution of Canada : constitution, act of parliament, uncodified constitution, constitutional convention (political custom), form of government, civil and political rights, French language, constitution act, 1982","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Alphascript Pub. eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Parliament; Politics; Political science; Law; Convention; Limited government; Government (linguistics); Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.017337019442992804,"score_gpt":0.26794762762794866,"score_spread":0.25061060818495584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W602390078","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002567757,0.06034766,0.0016827883,0.013832987,0.0020841265,0.00017257305,0.019629642,0.00043513768,0.89924735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045937214,0.032468263,0.0047018738,0.0040245038,0.0003431152,0.00022459167,0.012061007,0.0003887197,0.8998507],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987357,0.000069713,0.00003620238,0.000101139434,0.0008028185,0.0002544571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991271,0.000090918285,0.000038839516,0.000034691093,0.00060884765,0.0000995733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000503715,0.0010060506,0.0005413466,0.0035243193,0.006494168,0.0057003153,0.001451491,0.002116796,0.025078814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024495206,0.0006088173,0.00027012147,0.009717782,0.00286981,0.0017979633,0.00085333025,0.002259602,0.0052949614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010865465,0.000011077549,0.00041101113,0.00012349905,0.000004584417,0.000042710628,0.00085408386,0.00025871245,0.00009800701,0.14489424,0.8164418,0.036849372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033592398,0.000001540635,0.0019890913,0.0001051495,0.000003418521,0.000030658084,0.00030674564,0.000067572204,0.00006417009,0.0047889147,0.9926252,0.000014178013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98913693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99596417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094606444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.094606444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17093635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68642104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W603888656","doi":"10.3138/9781442627901","title":"Indigenous Difference and the Constitution of Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":255,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Indigenous; Political science; Geography; Law; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.018221838054836258,"score_gpt":0.21499579505707678,"score_spread":0.1967739570022405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W603888656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007302639,0.014716923,0.00034012104,0.012294949,0.0004993011,0.00003528585,0.0001740832,0.000039886418,0.96459687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42219922,0.01223777,0.0013999451,0.009695999,0.00022387279,0.00010048795,0.00025283083,0.00009143286,0.55379844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976689,0.00017368699,0.000034228015,0.00019396002,0.0009800553,0.00094900624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992544,0.00014157247,0.000024994628,0.000047653906,0.00037055204,0.00016075834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097211736,0.0003373853,0.000321167,0.0015381764,0.022160819,0.00872599,0.0014126827,0.0021407409,0.009070534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022322373,0.00026756572,0.0002442165,0.002611701,0.013507887,0.0017612778,0.0026341532,0.0038440297,0.00056852493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004354393,0.000002843959,0.00012615455,0.00002141301,0.0000019500833,0.00005419396,0.0036443819,0.00008094051,0.00004005929,0.9667295,0.023933558,0.005360623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010072744,0.0000045166394,0.0019083372,0.00017027723,0.000010960565,0.000060097762,0.0036144955,0.00015640381,0.00009149345,0.054215074,0.93973106,0.00002725228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98601806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99083346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.118613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.118613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1365148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86060154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W605094940","doi":"10.21991/c9th5g","title":"COMMITTEE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF CANADA V. CANADA: EXPRESSION ON PUBLIC PROPERTY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Property (philosophy); Expression (computer science); Political science; Public administration; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.07212678137162992,"score_gpt":0.2714665961266507,"score_spread":0.19933981475502077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W605094940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011293334,0.006733237,0.0027664462,0.2301147,0.0035601058,0.0012176246,0.00846992,0.00058173697,0.7352629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13403429,0.004846555,0.0055707805,0.16387856,0.00076120085,0.0008978329,0.002464142,0.0004734488,0.68707323],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97287536,0.0018739698,0.0010286355,0.0013052167,0.015589482,0.0073274174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96743983,0.0051619792,0.00076887076,0.0012040768,0.020890977,0.004534268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009960362,0.001152549,0.001054231,0.0033028556,0.026151722,0.013901942,0.006076831,0.021536041,0.023837635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028222568,0.0017833242,0.0016558281,0.004457285,0.006363076,0.003060043,0.0034317987,0.0150196,0.004877857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004621178,0.000055216344,0.0013835644,0.000098377655,0.000028284114,0.00015855703,0.0015256427,0.0002643551,0.0005440381,0.12140509,0.86747974,0.007010965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007672968,0.000020213409,0.008295238,0.0003740221,0.00008107368,0.000052210045,0.002032718,0.0003439812,0.0007121552,0.0073586907,0.980441,0.00021198393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99263555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99608326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.112000406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.112000406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.44872603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8126236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W607144950","doi":"10.71781/2511","title":"Triangulation of rights, balancing of interests : exploring the tensions between freedom of conscience and freedom of religion in comparative constitutional law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Law; Political science; Triangulation; Freedom of religion; Human rights; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.12602035902652556,"score_gpt":0.38844987042280754,"score_spread":0.262429511396282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W607144950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50229496,0.0069763944,0.08905397,0.019283291,0.00024890466,0.00078097003,0.00025433165,0.000032266842,0.38107482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98852766,0.00074143626,0.0067491806,0.00035702653,0.00002831444,0.00036614048,0.000056968154,0.00002173081,0.00315154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9533322,0.039448462,0.0009384481,0.0018966976,0.003008591,0.0013756439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96491796,0.025146708,0.00278849,0.00388464,0.0025986452,0.0006635401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03757391,0.00031129175,0.0007582851,0.0059688613,0.010985647,0.009660805,0.0026387374,0.0029390308,0.006916705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069726355,0.00055824895,0.00059230474,0.007025764,0.055035625,0.01861775,0.013639986,0.00329192,0.00028870167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027310645,0.000019223284,0.0023443312,0.00012013545,0.000009810954,0.00017745524,0.33652425,0.00016086097,0.0001470373,0.64655316,0.00033309532,0.013583327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053730382,0.00006498451,0.0076241293,0.0009914904,0.000030985066,0.0002609584,0.53786993,0.000828118,0.00043236223,0.40026644,0.051537246,0.000039564948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039301604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05079227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039301604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017664542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012105191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19871223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W608691202","doi":"","title":"Law and order","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Pearson eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04066260144951496,"score_gpt":0.3039386100844718,"score_spread":0.26327600863495687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W608691202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048331765,0.004787616,0.0019183236,0.032289673,0.0037655376,0.00005149369,0.00025524638,0.00008411667,0.95636475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06370837,0.0051771523,0.0017244547,0.028651157,0.005560631,0.00024702994,0.00047588954,0.00024622647,0.894209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701214,0.0008292376,0.00015572608,0.00052627147,0.0009906745,0.0004859546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99719304,0.00097438414,0.00014395556,0.0005301994,0.0008642937,0.00029412817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025897068,0.00062951463,0.0005929504,0.0014175625,0.009289487,0.010983642,0.0012400594,0.00402719,0.11052407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009007373,0.00043824856,0.00040188138,0.0014558772,0.011996697,0.009822692,0.004150475,0.0069157225,0.027045673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003598498,0.0000057884636,0.000044412325,0.000017012366,7.6584666e-7,0.0000200263,0.0009259396,0.000024375131,0.000018599607,0.8141699,0.17713384,0.007635838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022524373,0.0000036536057,0.0000615653,0.00010683513,6.20407e-7,0.000020107947,0.00057683216,0.000025155196,0.000018918514,0.089971796,0.90920925,0.0000030396322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016747357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017443096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11052407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077441703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067606447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36973983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W60936869","doi":"10.29173/alr147","title":"Calculations of Conscience: The Costs and Benefits of Religious and Conscientious Freedom","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Charter; Religious freedom; Supreme court; Law; Freedom of religion; Relation (database); Freedom of thought; Conscientious objector; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Human rights; Economic freedom; Computer science","score_opus":0.04491119498714585,"score_gpt":0.3072230540440316,"score_spread":0.26231185905688575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W60936869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11975643,0.016609998,0.035047982,0.053213604,0.0007208885,0.00023674144,0.00034998564,0.00006567593,0.7739986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98147225,0.002631215,0.0032120934,0.001913036,0.00022844513,0.00005335326,0.00006005984,0.000020240266,0.010409169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98535013,0.0054822173,0.0002709866,0.0004707654,0.0073266556,0.0010992631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97590977,0.018125644,0.0011378847,0.0018406144,0.0024520517,0.0005340612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074693593,0.00051900645,0.00060609996,0.0030194605,0.0025223873,0.0057630627,0.0019253981,0.0026913558,0.0068860534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03677355,0.00034725576,0.00084125076,0.001917867,0.013508401,0.004478905,0.0033355134,0.0043408237,0.00027760293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050596827,0.00003264643,0.0022494858,0.00008107741,0.000034980945,0.00010520171,0.00041812504,0.0040776767,0.00010676509,0.96133566,0.0024260597,0.029081754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007063571,0.00009148152,0.014109248,0.0006102099,0.00013971979,0.0002607433,0.0014120715,0.008202569,0.0004778141,0.9144124,0.06012607,0.00008700852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1507771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22321631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1507771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016623162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015842877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29979897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W611177413","doi":"","title":"The Constitution of Independence: The Development of Constitutional Theory in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Research Portal (King's College London)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Constitution; Parliamentary sovereignty; Sovereignty; Independence (probability theory); Law; Constitutional theory; Popular sovereignty; Political science; Empire; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07005449251661283,"score_gpt":0.36520379223143073,"score_spread":0.2951492997148179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W611177413","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032758575,0.03397279,0.005625979,0.026694546,0.0004444654,0.00011522916,0.0002413093,0.000040478022,0.90010655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8733892,0.035548534,0.0076413145,0.0016357978,0.00023352292,0.00014906947,0.00028795697,0.00006967356,0.08104489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969216,0.0005859333,0.00008214705,0.00027428454,0.001455368,0.0006807032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996546,0.0014314906,0.00019762736,0.00016016551,0.0012523073,0.00041229048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003930429,0.00046531262,0.00054812204,0.0052988306,0.011224735,0.010123557,0.0018120282,0.0019682916,0.0069021643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008154768,0.0004431967,0.00030975795,0.008811176,0.032228246,0.005508783,0.002564292,0.0040624673,0.00030151792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002541648,0.000004596882,0.0002754692,0.000039823484,0.0000019037733,0.00004090527,0.005738559,0.00031058618,0.000021308333,0.97746336,0.005357732,0.010743281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011994429,0.000011744951,0.011934081,0.0011880774,0.00001968812,0.00010025015,0.015490803,0.0021563913,0.00013968274,0.48026115,0.4886325,0.00005358594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95600945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9586159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11861407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11861407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12483708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86060935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W613864256","doi":"","title":"Calling power to account : law, reparations, and the Chinese Canadian head tax case","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Redress; Law; Statutory law; Political science; Appeal; Sociology","score_opus":0.020918718115401205,"score_gpt":0.32684184672137123,"score_spread":0.30592312860597004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W613864256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080629066,0.009826979,0.0006191015,0.06730867,0.0009270158,0.00021498889,0.0006867102,0.00005882404,0.8397285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6319497,0.007089109,0.00059596106,0.013277401,0.00029768771,0.00014036683,0.00026604842,0.000048252114,0.34633553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731207,0.0002450963,0.00004784283,0.00018989257,0.00081898004,0.0013861174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981832,0.0004985313,0.00009668735,0.0001053839,0.0007278441,0.00038826902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014619826,0.000478145,0.00028646272,0.0027971577,0.028021375,0.0072971275,0.0021404028,0.0035395103,0.011094759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004511617,0.0003203569,0.00035534528,0.0054547046,0.012959934,0.00212531,0.0024194885,0.0035213681,0.000572665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003122366,0.00002300765,0.003719364,0.000096754484,0.000007566394,0.0013251548,0.024055231,0.00046638882,0.00019213706,0.77433944,0.1756977,0.020046074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019647096,0.000015930775,0.0205545,0.00031795714,0.000031952153,0.00021790253,0.038018033,0.00060880935,0.0004343883,0.030298756,0.90934294,0.00013924127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99385947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16324423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16324423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15790524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9705181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W614274994","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139013789","title":"Marriage and Divorce in a Multicultural Context: Multi-Tiered Marriage And The Boundaries Of Civil Law And Religion","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Law; Legal pluralism; Multiculturalism; Marriage law; Religious law; Sociology; Pluralism (philosophy); Citizenship; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Comparative law; Politics; Public law; Legal realism; Islam; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01801676471121098,"score_gpt":0.2657856318087223,"score_spread":0.2477688670975113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W614274994","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10200018,0.48259538,0.0009795976,0.1429558,0.006644431,0.00006360175,0.000067282046,0.000029739065,0.26466408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81691736,0.13687189,0.0005455162,0.008820001,0.0043427316,0.000046931207,0.00005163127,0.000020220194,0.032383732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978897,0.0013802372,0.000042078133,0.00014796566,0.00031588622,0.00022420954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99697757,0.0015552449,0.00030267643,0.000073999385,0.0003620792,0.0007283084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021845752,0.00036946387,0.0006342325,0.0015424223,0.011981007,0.006657979,0.0008897002,0.0011664691,0.004917832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039245384,0.00030746273,0.00021090418,0.0023982315,0.010261311,0.0045285583,0.00505419,0.0033448425,0.00029088324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054922497,0.00014370146,0.00856622,0.00037998758,0.000020050376,0.0013295226,0.21693537,0.00021027758,0.00012586833,0.5966651,0.09359382,0.08197521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016918884,0.00008962672,0.02509641,0.0015598357,0.000018677682,0.00084594154,0.3264361,0.0003184932,0.00009929387,0.1446648,0.5008023,0.000051708237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041366234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09765182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041366234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057411077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056345006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08225089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W636851208","doi":"10.3138/9781442671522","title":"Bora Laskin: Bringing Law to Life","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Federalism; Supreme Court Decisions; Politics","score_opus":0.029427279374476114,"score_gpt":0.26196193133620016,"score_spread":0.23253465196172404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W636851208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006782071,0.027201762,0.0010177959,0.06593485,0.0051943813,0.000042443968,0.00008745341,0.00009846774,0.89974463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010522298,0.006991106,0.00048054094,0.02005027,0.0006216373,0.000058814385,0.000042499836,0.000092961774,0.9611398],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996138,0.00012710402,0.000012061523,0.000057116296,0.00012148688,0.000068577734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970573,0.00011750238,0.000011510386,0.000017101249,0.00006389365,0.00008420347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006236266,0.0004884851,0.00029014563,0.0008702344,0.007570965,0.0041257334,0.00077868014,0.002609064,0.043944165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001228418,0.00036778304,0.00018629947,0.00081937556,0.0044733165,0.005212841,0.0020778042,0.0055011185,0.010128686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030941906,0.0000153517,0.000035799178,0.00002433781,6.353818e-7,0.000033037737,0.0016033313,0.000029422732,0.00003545503,0.24113943,0.740858,0.016222095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012383151,0.0000015706901,0.000059835853,0.00005440832,4.6956515e-7,0.00002125682,0.00074359344,0.000013287153,0.000018802204,0.015465027,0.9836182,0.0000023143753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046942748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14106148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046942748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007831249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005501515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14700782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W639867689","doi":"","title":"The Scope and Interpretation of the Civil Code of Lower Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Medical Entomology and Zoology","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Scope (computer science); Civil code; Code (set theory); Political science; Law; Epistemology; Computer science; Programming language; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00800350181056499,"score_gpt":0.2710659422591503,"score_spread":0.26306244044858534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W639867689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02423188,0.008697066,0.0018765043,0.025325006,0.0005274742,0.000042768566,0.00033569563,0.000039074064,0.93892455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6726721,0.0055229003,0.0021843887,0.0043727625,0.00018438377,0.00006536501,0.00018523715,0.00013431268,0.3146785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969702,0.00038538786,0.000055807624,0.0002640238,0.0011500827,0.0011743957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821764,0.00037012115,0.000069099144,0.00008127362,0.0009867437,0.00027504715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011225593,0.00044526556,0.0004231213,0.0026074008,0.019688614,0.011715966,0.0016668602,0.0026369295,0.008027715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004408922,0.00054251635,0.00027808396,0.004531935,0.020665456,0.002330802,0.0023299307,0.0054441323,0.00056357007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056733925,0.0000033437825,0.0005361692,0.000014170603,0.0000020236957,0.000056221415,0.0103846,0.00015651203,0.00005924764,0.9550972,0.021969756,0.011715169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005856915,0.000007700355,0.008614505,0.0003601891,0.000013282733,0.000109858054,0.019088237,0.0006928387,0.0001944283,0.15994188,0.81091464,0.00005651025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9932059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.124793574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.124793574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17132933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.905445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W644601168","doi":"","title":"Towards an Ethics of Community: Negotiations of Difference in a Pluralist Society","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Honour; Postmodernism; Faith; Negotiation; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Deviance (statistics); Law; Social science; Media studies; Art; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07069602876341685,"score_gpt":0.30856467015598527,"score_spread":0.23786864139256841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W644601168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024312416,0.013622065,0.019198399,0.15469286,0.0034236147,0.00014310429,0.000028036755,0.00011838152,0.78446114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7203165,0.0076478356,0.010731639,0.02174477,0.0014312523,0.0002519421,0.00004771746,0.00026254132,0.23756585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931471,0.00425535,0.00008781525,0.00029664143,0.0013868087,0.0008262695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727577,0.0012003289,0.0001755703,0.00019898327,0.00043017312,0.00071923365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044605895,0.0005462879,0.00048152692,0.00067968125,0.016906701,0.017231476,0.0015444146,0.004403895,0.0035681739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050626565,0.00027671875,0.00034389782,0.0008810448,0.0508532,0.010356577,0.007350317,0.008639987,0.0007719844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007040066,0.000017178256,0.0001365559,0.000043666492,0.0000027389988,0.00013793727,0.074739635,0.0001465172,0.000115452225,0.8882542,0.027889634,0.0085093705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010115593,0.000028107124,0.0002881215,0.00023260784,0.0000042766974,0.0001318212,0.07509529,0.00033590005,0.00013740888,0.32564828,0.5980699,0.000018145505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028904483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05445666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028904483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01340021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020157635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097225785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W646178245","doi":"","title":"Public Law: An Overview of Aboriginal, Administrative, Constitutional and International Law in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Administrative law; Public law; Constitutional law; Comparative law","score_opus":0.09942884667948793,"score_gpt":0.3475195930818287,"score_spread":0.2480907464023408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W646178245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009636892,0.24629132,0.0018178537,0.026186401,0.0019632652,0.00014046648,0.0012745718,0.00020321857,0.712486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12528627,0.29651463,0.0037968415,0.0061050975,0.0007724521,0.00014937254,0.0012613019,0.00022101554,0.56589293],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998868,0.00006991959,0.000023713066,0.00006996455,0.00063198427,0.00033658493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929476,0.00009212063,0.000031592685,0.000019534129,0.00036399683,0.00019794508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061156903,0.00070112187,0.00044005053,0.0060056164,0.013044926,0.0072046765,0.001535388,0.0018224256,0.014623385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010641189,0.00044008263,0.0003681914,0.017814683,0.0054486883,0.0023598785,0.0017265782,0.0018328986,0.0014555384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011419398,0.00006770583,0.0025617068,0.0005683967,0.000012330404,0.00037732458,0.011921664,0.0011271548,0.00023893917,0.28875086,0.5403831,0.15397939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012714181,0.0000033816298,0.004345883,0.00026832602,0.0000050358703,0.00010386508,0.002987084,0.00014716394,0.000031369396,0.0044312007,0.9876637,0.000011848949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9935027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99767536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1414354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1414354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2327321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99581325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W64685650","doi":"10.21991/c9fq07","title":"CANADA'S QUEST FOR CONSTITUTIONAL PERFECTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Perfection; Philosophy; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.04150483677496133,"score_gpt":0.28082084795185586,"score_spread":0.23931601117689452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W64685650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047621794,0.0057547255,0.0027517956,0.31387606,0.0007996201,0.000078171506,0.00063097454,0.00013932149,0.6283475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8657715,0.0027198999,0.0028226047,0.03775217,0.00025285155,0.000078736884,0.00017365161,0.00015556115,0.09027302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801123,0.0025174026,0.00047412212,0.001752234,0.008401203,0.0067427424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800735,0.004872279,0.00058834016,0.0013172446,0.00921501,0.0039335904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010443682,0.0004223971,0.0012386073,0.003245226,0.035438616,0.022277398,0.003073426,0.00892895,0.01269402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028070182,0.00089856324,0.00087714393,0.004215862,0.025477977,0.0061254282,0.006377207,0.016516361,0.00056322746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016860646,0.000007850222,0.00045973057,0.000024341603,0.000013217764,0.000055386252,0.0021211423,0.00026571486,0.00005580623,0.9605796,0.031138306,0.0052619926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112488684,0.000021088985,0.0053744484,0.0003278852,0.00007369798,0.00010026041,0.008196325,0.0011153324,0.00048215632,0.44074282,0.5432605,0.0001931039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99003696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84532785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15467213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36147904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9804605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W651745859","doi":"","title":"The psychology of justice and legitimacy : the Ontario Symposium","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Psychology Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Legitimacy; Economic Justice; Politics; Blame; Social psychology; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05858516120892503,"score_gpt":0.3712442374378867,"score_spread":0.31265907622896166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W651745859","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019537504,0.45580897,0.00072693883,0.2506435,0.006048642,0.000027028223,0.00025597852,0.000030251762,0.28450495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21155839,0.32954893,0.0013256617,0.02300502,0.0073775393,0.00011326054,0.00019488166,0.0001666742,0.4267096],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976937,0.0006949859,0.00009567076,0.000306797,0.000760261,0.00044862763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980045,0.00054196035,0.00013212497,0.00020424007,0.0006344158,0.0004826708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020939729,0.0008476591,0.0010013918,0.0020244932,0.013082527,0.010722465,0.0012829272,0.007164976,0.023378756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042158524,0.00076792034,0.0007371707,0.004687824,0.026025338,0.0076209614,0.0044895927,0.0035028078,0.003956405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054590582,0.000048736092,0.0015757218,0.0003949094,0.000023892155,0.00025327742,0.006210487,0.0003493202,0.00021811984,0.4421268,0.50459546,0.044148564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013413302,0.0000063222096,0.0017741877,0.0006162022,0.000009231919,0.00004483915,0.0022333236,0.00006916178,0.00003903682,0.07403757,0.92113906,0.000017644406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6999395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83348036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6999395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.071248434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036325153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6036552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W652212226","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal justice and the Charter : realizing a culturally sensitive interpretation of legal rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"UBC Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Economic Justice; Miller; Political science; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021590533325061306,"score_gpt":0.3099246111933482,"score_spread":0.2883340778682869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W652212226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006232875,0.03254127,0.001636652,0.20970587,0.004954815,0.00007232226,0.000056714074,0.000051684667,0.7447478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30290568,0.042582072,0.0048402064,0.034221634,0.0022302617,0.00018092645,0.00008453191,0.00021571429,0.6127389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972742,0.0011468154,0.000054672848,0.00011847643,0.0008166381,0.00058914156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977081,0.0011285411,0.0000848467,0.00008325928,0.00066886266,0.00032636645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034713405,0.0005300488,0.00055126776,0.0014290737,0.02143713,0.012441038,0.0014878539,0.0036128773,0.010235058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050683306,0.00036784404,0.00023107952,0.0021280635,0.026046686,0.005884167,0.0030077484,0.008268449,0.0008905996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070845804,0.000018713026,0.0001347271,0.00010309051,0.0000031671332,0.00017573553,0.09410658,0.000101796424,0.00010160051,0.72479796,0.15838486,0.022064585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062149534,0.000009697715,0.0008877119,0.00067057455,0.00000756539,0.00012299196,0.094210796,0.00010208028,0.00012815722,0.091891654,0.81193495,0.000027642607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8212538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9129887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17874622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03098097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.071193404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35959774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W652692206","doi":"10.5860/choice.51-3452","title":"Lord Mansfield: justice in the age of reason","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; History; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.09194085210354518,"score_gpt":0.4023132341256964,"score_spread":0.3103723820221512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W652692206","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014809649,0.12030358,0.0017516734,0.45150417,0.010723186,0.000021097088,0.000073998905,0.00006288806,0.40074974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5819198,0.0225883,0.0011175458,0.11580584,0.005858392,0.000054025135,0.000044579643,0.00008917217,0.27252233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687225,0.0012585137,0.00007586335,0.00025232448,0.0009929383,0.0005481521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986253,0.00069038785,0.00009701351,0.00005923545,0.00024877177,0.00027925012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024522243,0.00023666571,0.0002969783,0.0007594274,0.010185572,0.006731538,0.0005243834,0.0045575215,0.0064676343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005639833,0.00021476892,0.00017367161,0.0005933136,0.020511903,0.0053545963,0.0039137285,0.00700989,0.0012140505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019982888,0.000008228553,0.00028918678,0.00004993472,0.0000026064477,0.00031540863,0.020926792,0.000026832638,0.000092117865,0.7694286,0.19578643,0.013053865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057406523,0.000010442693,0.00046536463,0.00020340497,0.0000015435941,0.00019938212,0.0045061368,0.000023105506,0.00007543302,0.05785526,0.93664014,0.000014060932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035250854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051691845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035250854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074982857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006554179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07009131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W67314392","doi":"","title":"Women and the Canadian Legal System: Examining Situations of Hyper-Responsability","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.058642821512053044,"score_gpt":0.2840631292151134,"score_spread":0.22542030770306035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W67314392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8059443,0.003652448,0.0004967516,0.04285588,0.00030029766,0.00016463194,0.00019962914,0.000019727,0.14636628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890352,0.0013845853,0.00023518057,0.0025998016,0.00003368509,0.000055783785,0.00004403809,0.000015290281,0.0065963496],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798631,0.0063955905,0.0003639178,0.0010301642,0.0041725887,0.008174497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9764574,0.008245622,0.0023096327,0.0007259165,0.0061344816,0.006126957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013209291,0.00087079423,0.00097309635,0.0087790005,0.11835937,0.021658702,0.005752213,0.008393243,0.006915716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035110712,0.0011004924,0.0006715114,0.014627095,0.056515303,0.008233302,0.017568609,0.009721161,0.00028939586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003184861,0.000036511618,0.010481196,0.000060206094,0.000010045877,0.0005285877,0.9387005,0.000051172276,0.00011761404,0.040316135,0.0046958746,0.0049704365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005640147,0.0000075953676,0.0060374006,0.00009870426,0.000008991227,0.00007420246,0.97286856,0.000039743176,0.000045056655,0.0012027479,0.019584814,0.000026418165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99445677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23407595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23407595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29689816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88836336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6894125576","doi":"10.5287/ora-zozxe810n","title":"The notwithstanding clause in the Canadian charter of rights and freedoms: a new interpretive approach","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislation; Equal Protection Clause; Supreme court; Legislature; Establishment Clause; Judicial review; Dormant Commerce Clause; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.03308588672588148,"score_gpt":0.29350575532987033,"score_spread":0.26041986860398886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6894125576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021317413,0.012385079,0.07545246,0.11355861,0.0025778094,0.00026278922,0.0006781536,0.00015674924,0.77361107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8622932,0.009133803,0.05049429,0.016971074,0.0014585854,0.00022695072,0.00032937757,0.00020699463,0.058885746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99105716,0.0023285197,0.00025076143,0.0011002747,0.0039072856,0.0013559643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910253,0.0038243404,0.0003729465,0.0006152115,0.003697867,0.00046433377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009816123,0.0007839481,0.0008107925,0.0067226896,0.014998255,0.018718895,0.0039638514,0.004756543,0.003780395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014004114,0.00046982616,0.00062992156,0.0067798104,0.06365348,0.007525261,0.0041182656,0.009288623,0.0004297655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002136556,0.0000017390531,0.00011411508,0.0000125626875,0.0000010050384,0.000036517915,0.0038978143,0.00010926291,0.000030114601,0.9898638,0.0036382072,0.0022926515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014820711,0.000008769365,0.0014410679,0.00039733262,0.000028882094,0.00010730008,0.009183488,0.0025072675,0.00027539098,0.57910067,0.40684962,0.00008543774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91934866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90066713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.099332854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.112051964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7207137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6904662550","doi":"10.14288/1.0221993","title":"Rules of the Law Society of British Columbia","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Work (physics); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.021736731876646983,"score_gpt":0.2147679610793972,"score_spread":0.1930312292027502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6904662550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1838649,0.004924903,0.0009902191,0.024133472,0.0005013047,0.00022547075,0.0037781398,0.00015402994,0.78142756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59866256,0.0015971694,0.0010494511,0.0017971122,0.00004661116,0.00009394877,0.0006089602,0.00007260352,0.39607167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973459,0.00034582833,0.0001544946,0.00028303347,0.0010838145,0.00078689714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99266547,0.0012492047,0.0003418803,0.0003853995,0.0038436898,0.0015144293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011702663,0.0002805665,0.00038351986,0.0025540323,0.014848554,0.011411462,0.0014243564,0.0020818482,0.021527644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007297308,0.0006613261,0.00016664722,0.0031510121,0.0029875392,0.0011376018,0.0016525129,0.0029275278,0.0012496855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071912844,0.00011287947,0.022596173,0.00018663982,0.00004723064,0.00091695826,0.01367407,0.001619545,0.00082293455,0.61530745,0.27183565,0.07280857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025154803,0.000021185275,0.09289165,0.00037221034,0.00003809413,0.00017025907,0.011928812,0.0015495401,0.00040759335,0.024902735,0.8675558,0.00013686522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97779036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99330926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05992893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05992893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08296436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43481684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6923635745","doi":"10.14288/1.0370798","title":"An Act to Amend the Procedure in Civil Cases. Whereas, it is expedient to amend the Procedure of the Supreme Court of Civil Justice; Be it therefore enacted by the Governor on behalf of Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Council and Assembly of Vancouver Island and its Dependencies, as follows: ...","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Governor; Supreme court; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Civil procedure; Legislation; Civil rights","score_opus":0.03848622223458657,"score_gpt":0.305923607294494,"score_spread":0.26743738505990744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6923635745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076966784,0.0052187787,0.014530658,0.11358637,0.026403408,0.0014995949,0.0013416846,0.0015159467,0.82820684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08148578,0.001627501,0.024081102,0.1213419,0.0035941133,0.0015187161,0.0008849173,0.0006518341,0.7648141],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96292025,0.010990093,0.0043915957,0.0028977362,0.014278569,0.0045216503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9553471,0.013323036,0.0026897246,0.008719439,0.017380515,0.0025400787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021418825,0.00095644785,0.0008699301,0.0017343665,0.012108288,0.00981858,0.002699105,0.025509154,0.013803748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064406574,0.0016129423,0.0012502786,0.0014153173,0.011844936,0.0036687737,0.004373696,0.023628054,0.023826076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006864995,0.00007645327,0.0007202698,0.00011082917,0.000019980045,0.00021190771,0.0031168282,0.000118453005,0.0016589803,0.2799712,0.69142085,0.022505544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030262185,0.000025356094,0.001787725,0.00021681444,0.00002749387,0.00018934657,0.0006785025,0.00010076684,0.0006196602,0.010676271,0.9855481,0.00009969655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15009703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2410666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.849903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00852739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04449391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2984467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6959482345","doi":"10.71860/kr.v33i1.122597","title":"Jesus Christus, das Leben der Welt, in Feier und Bekenntnis von Vancouver","year":2025,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen - Open Journals - Ökumenische Rundschau","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Context (archaeology); Relation (database); Identity (music)","score_opus":0.03828968237977179,"score_gpt":0.3695081568436442,"score_spread":0.3312184744638724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6959482345","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024349945,0.48032022,0.0007331496,0.31570035,0.021551372,0.00007234739,0.0003556132,0.000059380724,0.15685765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2742242,0.15716293,0.00083011016,0.02817689,0.0028332425,0.00010147266,0.00019964238,0.0002170734,0.5362545],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800056,0.0006117444,0.00007627323,0.00023079509,0.000563527,0.0005170277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983176,0.00054947846,0.00006581582,0.000037590344,0.0003481736,0.0006812967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001517585,0.0007584832,0.0006866424,0.0015997133,0.029193634,0.009861787,0.0012150604,0.0044973614,0.009878279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003409506,0.00059409055,0.00019789906,0.0031359089,0.007645002,0.002846761,0.004249102,0.0069576753,0.0014995914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000619428,0.000040851362,0.0017792013,0.00041734643,0.000025701658,0.0009760192,0.08411721,0.00017640075,0.00032427738,0.09578713,0.73735625,0.07893766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028558602,0.000003218926,0.0011371361,0.00027855491,0.000003549474,0.00013349646,0.026758876,0.000019182198,0.00010006511,0.002883665,0.96866286,0.000016430547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80598384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9383749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80598384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024544302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029111777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3903175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6960850172","doi":"10.14288/1.0370688","title":"Proclamation. By His Excellency James Douglas, Governor and Commander-in-Chief of her Majesty's Colony of British Columbia and its Dependencies. Proclamation, having the Force of Law to declare that English Law is in force in British Columbia. Whereas, by an Act of Parliament passed in the Session held in the 21st and 22nd years of her Majesty Queen Victoria, it was enacted that the Territories therein described...","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Governor; Parliament; English law; Proclamation; Queen (butterfly); Common law; Doctrine; Criminal law","score_opus":0.019438173503279654,"score_gpt":0.26083731910769337,"score_spread":0.24139914560441372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6960850172","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010065022,0.012064608,0.0011910578,0.07134105,0.016762849,0.0003464097,0.0019043371,0.0004999792,0.8858247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008664895,0.0004887173,0.000114086055,0.0059426967,0.00012784272,0.000029358012,0.00010614485,0.000038577648,0.9844876],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981,0.00010362801,0.000053025968,0.00024133488,0.0007214259,0.0007805564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771464,0.00013170435,0.00007410398,0.00006354705,0.0015020114,0.00051395077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006907228,0.00079921645,0.00031460798,0.00075357937,0.015552012,0.00465833,0.0011346953,0.0044044475,0.056631688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030833813,0.00065702654,0.00028304287,0.00053602445,0.002296231,0.0011672575,0.0017303093,0.008127676,0.023309851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018842877,0.000012962791,0.0007712745,0.000042627205,0.0000039523684,0.00020633596,0.0013004475,0.000037828115,0.00042582085,0.009276077,0.98017955,0.007724287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032973062,0.0000053691,0.0015042278,0.000027693442,0.0000028010038,0.000033216067,0.00085880415,0.000013290704,0.00014187826,0.00016861466,0.9972281,0.000012728339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84473443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96226734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15526557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017685978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031597164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31235987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6961263571","doi":"10.14288/1.0348112","title":"Constitution and by-laws of the Native Sons of British Columbia : as amended and adopted by the Grand Post, June 21, 1902","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Government (linguistics); Subject (documents); Prime minister","score_opus":0.011205693999476221,"score_gpt":0.2165818075414972,"score_spread":0.20537611354202098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6961263571","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1315509,0.010214042,0.0009059799,0.048788723,0.0054637454,0.00086297974,0.0062726648,0.0002639712,0.7956769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15297735,0.0021278937,0.0014706198,0.010902689,0.00030065503,0.00051804236,0.0006580783,0.00009707701,0.8309475],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970482,0.00028684863,0.0002483339,0.00031636903,0.0007378015,0.0013625699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973137,0.00051978993,0.00011554903,0.00019815248,0.0014505713,0.00040227146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022904105,0.0005630015,0.0006612203,0.0010081034,0.018035822,0.0059125065,0.0017899352,0.007372414,0.0077589387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069706608,0.0013584166,0.00031878057,0.0018840242,0.0041045365,0.0011842529,0.0017387037,0.011256475,0.0015811409],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022121545,0.00018528309,0.008450121,0.00030588568,0.000040728395,0.0016970044,0.046017095,0.0004828678,0.0037221988,0.36474943,0.5296587,0.04446953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033609103,0.000031383195,0.029851925,0.00025773037,0.000039833085,0.00011534827,0.007407318,0.0001408003,0.0009391684,0.0029451353,0.9580866,0.00015111518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9626728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9861828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03732717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029191377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.088141374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21179926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6977797227","doi":"10.7939/r3-5jss-aj67","title":"On the Right(s) Path: A Study of Human Rights Law and Practice in British Columbia","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"University of Alberta Library","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Fundamental rights; Commission; International human rights law; Reservation of rights; Right to property; Statute; Legislation; Linguistic rights","score_opus":0.010704252935211545,"score_gpt":0.24522441902124634,"score_spread":0.2345201660860348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6977797227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9435996,0.0019061496,0.00021195806,0.006831124,0.000043101005,0.00010092131,0.00038267073,0.000011698745,0.04691279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816094,0.0015767036,0.00028732672,0.0016825624,0.000007507745,0.0000615265,0.00022035715,0.000020351106,0.014534151],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950348,0.0008945734,0.00016958878,0.0004373391,0.0015849308,0.0018786872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851923,0.004944026,0.0008665624,0.00032383957,0.005649115,0.003024154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028359583,0.00030015528,0.00070790306,0.003952179,0.0314677,0.008162655,0.0027898243,0.0017768795,0.007969233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011226031,0.0005457035,0.00025388732,0.012280145,0.008585538,0.0024242592,0.0033883466,0.003329022,0.000632365],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116907955,0.00042568802,0.19044171,0.00039009514,0.00005161023,0.0023603975,0.6892475,0.00042698867,0.0011954912,0.032592304,0.026457943,0.056293268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000104705305,0.000033493558,0.17748491,0.00054526166,0.000019398602,0.00013309806,0.7794397,0.00048174616,0.00012317556,0.0011393892,0.04052349,0.00006596049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99700814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13979457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13979457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18141808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99771637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6977866302","doi":"10.7939/r3-grvy-ez64","title":"Vexatious Litigants, Meads, and the Hermeticism of Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"University of Alberta Library","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Alienation; Surprise; Class (philosophy); Relation (database); Function (biology)","score_opus":0.009981288153577883,"score_gpt":0.227700458519944,"score_spread":0.21771917036636612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6977866302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22979912,0.0071895644,0.008899196,0.13252,0.00051221834,0.00004822828,0.000029859099,0.000056425775,0.6209454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720419,0.00049780944,0.00085544284,0.003998545,0.000076580436,0.00001417236,0.000004948157,0.000017441515,0.022493115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665064,0.0019723333,0.000049906972,0.00039954053,0.0005477031,0.0003799227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982704,0.00094280625,0.00014266894,0.00018888421,0.00018531107,0.00026993605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035018472,0.00016399473,0.00018389641,0.00074632943,0.012195936,0.008936481,0.0009328306,0.002880129,0.0023285632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004765167,0.00016704971,0.00015641876,0.00047514358,0.07322935,0.0040721446,0.003922477,0.004000261,0.00019640125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041719936,0.0000055969995,0.00035085605,0.000006295481,8.968472e-7,0.00008228591,0.023187894,0.000037608832,0.00006892544,0.9713217,0.0025934658,0.00234032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017479648,0.000023557399,0.0018089374,0.00015220632,0.000005441043,0.0002286106,0.071169116,0.00051858125,0.00031579478,0.66312414,0.2626133,0.000022785067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060960766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.082795076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060960766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009951812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066899797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12121189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6979726935","doi":"","title":"Accepting the Unacceptable: Trinity Western University, Religious Freedom, and the Meaning of Liberal Constitutionalism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Meaning (existential); Conformity; Freedom of religion; State (computer science); Supreme court; Liberalism; Public reason","score_opus":0.023721619889679833,"score_gpt":0.27016372768589125,"score_spread":0.24644210779621142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6979726935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15598339,0.0065694842,0.010592429,0.27914032,0.0008141628,0.00003936279,0.000061422885,0.000055050878,0.5467444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98360866,0.00049696857,0.0008009147,0.0071356166,0.00015151143,0.000025127945,0.000011514072,0.000016772217,0.007752926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941024,0.0033158744,0.00013621812,0.00052623573,0.0010515851,0.0008676475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99586546,0.002156976,0.00039499332,0.00043816026,0.0005969158,0.0005474883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057067974,0.00020256487,0.00040007426,0.0008064001,0.009799049,0.009106027,0.0009409277,0.0041910647,0.0020290136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008479428,0.00023808522,0.00025301857,0.0009937297,0.06468126,0.0057683247,0.0045924704,0.008718203,0.0001623943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028901725,0.0000027402593,0.00013221262,0.0000041388753,6.3561606e-7,0.000019333464,0.0034038338,0.000026984613,0.000020347736,0.99514043,0.000596439,0.00065002166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012756475,0.0000070671895,0.00077712996,0.00009962405,0.0000049179703,0.000043566626,0.005813966,0.00021924182,0.00009710165,0.95500845,0.037895508,0.000020640526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12825607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12277304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9855146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014485394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014386283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25501907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6979757777","doi":"","title":"Addressing the Needs of Self-Represented Litigants in the Canadian Justice System","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Economic Justice; Service (business); Service provider; Legal service; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.12555843437848763,"score_gpt":0.36204168396397723,"score_spread":0.2364832495854896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6979757777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8339393,0.002768903,0.00076840987,0.105046965,0.00027116094,0.0001768796,0.00019271552,0.000037584567,0.056798056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98264736,0.0017753185,0.0009383019,0.0076068123,0.00004133232,0.000048553626,0.00008621826,0.000011003693,0.0068450766],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911384,0.0022239455,0.00021940282,0.0002905709,0.0017924736,0.0043351585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901634,0.00091889146,0.0004330094,0.00012537396,0.0035786056,0.0047806767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006497863,0.000348211,0.00043141085,0.0017108334,0.030756652,0.0074810977,0.0024643498,0.0030578312,0.0049022455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010411418,0.00029237432,0.00041332692,0.001990922,0.007621037,0.0028216587,0.00645854,0.0029716825,0.00030699992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010625662,0.00043000784,0.07383516,0.00066231465,0.000075181204,0.0042544766,0.6469497,0.00132272,0.0033469873,0.07216437,0.07815234,0.1187005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025432919,0.00009273337,0.05730834,0.0004911931,0.000045028486,0.00041597287,0.8247752,0.0012135837,0.00041252185,0.005947012,0.109158136,0.000114840586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9705879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99201924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07485194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07485194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21906155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54309136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980079240","doi":"","title":"Attitudes towards moral standards in the adjudication of the Supreme Court of Canada from 1982 to 2002","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Moral standards; Confidentiality","score_opus":0.027279885782125406,"score_gpt":0.30612257999302767,"score_spread":0.27884269421090224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980079240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.953741,0.0011241727,0.000117499774,0.016658649,0.00017245096,0.00005534577,0.0004042084,0.000010237527,0.027716441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98291254,0.0004343924,0.000091597234,0.0022270358,0.00004148226,0.000014917585,0.00017160663,0.000010385777,0.014096089],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98856246,0.001234641,0.0003835632,0.0007779327,0.0060790577,0.0029622752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9278042,0.010205037,0.007940031,0.00093934784,0.04112795,0.011983437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00797446,0.00022190735,0.0004911719,0.0030398157,0.023310993,0.0064617875,0.0024035927,0.0033067365,0.003071885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048673566,0.00052200485,0.00036944414,0.004209121,0.00635657,0.0017008682,0.002527394,0.0076741134,0.000275605],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047761586,0.00062476844,0.6092031,0.00017030179,0.00014808538,0.0012713269,0.23308955,0.0010793644,0.0007585859,0.029358068,0.062389318,0.06142987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035973917,0.00008408013,0.8470809,0.00021004691,0.00005065338,0.00014179062,0.07618211,0.0008026779,0.0006402879,0.0011460165,0.07348958,0.00013599312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17908417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17908417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19100434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.952146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980293843","doi":"","title":"The Boundaries of the Criminal Law: the Criminalization\\nof the Non-disclosure of HIV","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Criminal law; Supreme court; Contradiction; Punishment (psychology); Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Sentence","score_opus":0.028007062725832265,"score_gpt":0.28418093004570133,"score_spread":0.2561738673198691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980293843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30466625,0.04113001,0.001805251,0.31128794,0.0008887728,0.000043157503,0.00003888209,0.000012277491,0.3401275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97512937,0.0063789147,0.00027973205,0.012658849,0.00028620107,0.000018491053,0.0000086107675,0.0000075522166,0.0052322964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918738,0.0046787937,0.00013415623,0.00030819591,0.0015997117,0.0014053546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880707,0.0074984003,0.0017712106,0.0003147571,0.0012786901,0.0010661896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045021544,0.00017215838,0.00017354729,0.0016628917,0.01090474,0.0072381655,0.0007918755,0.0034171508,0.0015720984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019199505,0.000240233,0.00014272811,0.0010149538,0.041693732,0.006716687,0.004299537,0.005002019,0.00011943082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019890005,0.000044796707,0.013702334,0.00005457509,0.0000051803604,0.000945339,0.12756139,0.00009431601,0.00009179817,0.8055454,0.014673058,0.037262015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022531221,0.00009562314,0.07044418,0.00203621,0.000021112257,0.0031406605,0.4086498,0.00080155797,0.00043361433,0.22118972,0.2930662,0.000098766985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13737498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19709916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13737498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011899162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017508212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27315074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980709153","doi":"","title":"Connecting Grounds of Discrimination to Real People's Real Experiences","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislation; Mistake; Human rights; Supreme court; Statute; Statutory law; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.025589233607948285,"score_gpt":0.31322382804228954,"score_spread":0.28763459443434125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980709153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18744609,0.004200487,0.018657394,0.11083613,0.0014003572,0.000082296494,0.00011518744,0.00008207273,0.67717993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849187,0.00084565516,0.0012832603,0.003170442,0.00009761212,0.000038832306,0.000029162376,0.00004804818,0.009568362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99142903,0.004846274,0.00015830346,0.0006455181,0.0012109152,0.001709927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943838,0.002492328,0.00056008575,0.00062789343,0.00063139276,0.0013045379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007157023,0.00045453577,0.0004995846,0.0025371546,0.013440655,0.020765433,0.0020263966,0.0050107692,0.008977815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01032576,0.00040497378,0.00041643335,0.0016385528,0.095462926,0.018672384,0.024904301,0.009699861,0.00065809477],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006866567,0.000014870294,0.0011078507,0.000018743984,0.000004605337,0.0002455721,0.11223093,0.00006622721,0.000053031457,0.87798667,0.0026106697,0.005653979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010477842,0.000019330215,0.0017240981,0.00020034229,0.0000062291765,0.00024529698,0.24209067,0.0001763256,0.00011911324,0.643958,0.11141708,0.000033135686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022117745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033538256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022117745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012729645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006285406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0923605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6983028986","doi":"","title":"Law and Society Activities in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.016525827719425953,"score_gpt":0.2696620604232158,"score_spread":0.2531362327037898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6983028986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74057704,0.0030105314,0.00029775227,0.030090334,0.00018747096,0.00010283589,0.0024090959,0.00007747284,0.22324738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9336526,0.0015252356,0.00023000932,0.0014405708,0.000025748366,0.000030124917,0.00045540353,0.000031265685,0.06260909],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99528956,0.00038780252,0.0000975874,0.00027657714,0.0011572661,0.0027912317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98931915,0.0008000274,0.00045376123,0.00013002343,0.0025910174,0.006705961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013410003,0.0002840859,0.0005030092,0.004548616,0.0345046,0.0101287905,0.0024758854,0.0020610502,0.018831808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005502436,0.0004958301,0.0004910298,0.010267856,0.0053134877,0.0021863189,0.0048482544,0.0033276682,0.00074654917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020784004,0.00054344215,0.29639038,0.00025172677,0.000093379895,0.0017882654,0.12155828,0.0021366777,0.0006161892,0.35784554,0.09723571,0.12133263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037570946,0.00006663246,0.4454523,0.00037238456,0.00006127241,0.0002444773,0.20111078,0.0017117759,0.00040496912,0.0078692,0.34253347,0.00013512526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99872535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19972411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19972411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.313635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9282066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6983058555","doi":"","title":"The Legal Framework of Canada's Health Care System","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Health care; Malpractice; Tort; Health law; Private practice; Dental care; Dental insurance","score_opus":0.010462695552955995,"score_gpt":0.2735725876205358,"score_spread":0.26310989206757984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6983058555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075465506,0.011614977,0.0039159297,0.15384056,0.0010971238,0.00017558619,0.0010601874,0.0001840975,0.820565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6023435,0.0149228005,0.016795943,0.05993956,0.0009961883,0.0005634403,0.00083475583,0.00022845255,0.30337527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873241,0.0016955873,0.0003097958,0.0009247374,0.005494405,0.0042513995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992694,0.0013675484,0.00026171564,0.00031333894,0.0032269757,0.0021363297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044780225,0.0006674954,0.00071934925,0.0027219949,0.02594268,0.024833309,0.00434131,0.008642544,0.012024649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010633793,0.0007956583,0.00073372945,0.0046119117,0.023063794,0.0046459325,0.0057155485,0.0075166333,0.0010146202],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017286371,0.0000026168761,0.00017165577,0.000015982227,0.0000025646857,0.000057616762,0.00079322286,0.00023572866,0.000017889108,0.97535855,0.02127176,0.0020706125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031561012,0.000012717785,0.0029462462,0.00079708925,0.000021224394,0.00011132184,0.0047317804,0.0020501774,0.000060331462,0.20912103,0.78002167,0.00009489869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99337256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7519715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24802852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43670136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87218034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6983742416","doi":"","title":"A new paradigm for protecting autonomi and the right to legal capacity. Advancing Substantive Equality for Persons with Disabilities through Law, Policy and Practice. Law Commission of Ontario","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Mental capacity; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Set (abstract data type); Process (computing); Convention; Human rights; Legislation","score_opus":0.06997788008983295,"score_gpt":0.35504404837574854,"score_spread":0.2850661682859156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6983742416","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027341691,0.029499004,0.011683625,0.61492777,0.0051042493,0.00018190277,0.00017388613,0.00012773254,0.33556765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2478862,0.0211914,0.015369676,0.14218219,0.0033258994,0.0005839345,0.00018130544,0.0002934189,0.568986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98569864,0.0032997245,0.00077475636,0.0020132174,0.005621769,0.0025918789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991548,0.0032522718,0.0004857056,0.0008943987,0.002112928,0.0017066944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0111309,0.0008382414,0.0006563012,0.0022182665,0.021794993,0.018191207,0.0030867765,0.026678879,0.009929155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011614138,0.0010033322,0.00096320413,0.0025787265,0.06587392,0.013651813,0.007715018,0.021942195,0.0016085972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037132954,0.000008960797,0.000095415264,0.000044419383,0.0000016330499,0.00006639577,0.0040589133,0.000056637924,0.00007634917,0.92731535,0.06078725,0.0074849958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022850416,0.000008036242,0.0005112757,0.00031906847,0.000006668915,0.000114873634,0.0035014274,0.00017194521,0.0001334213,0.17406559,0.82110673,0.000038138238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7370035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8214382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9133326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08666745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11998274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6288193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986225024","doi":"","title":"The Ottawa Treaty on the path to customary law status","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"E-resource repository of the University of Latvia (University of Latvia)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Path (computing); Meaning (existential); Customary international law; Common law","score_opus":0.012707100279718444,"score_gpt":0.2186250782519571,"score_spread":0.20591797797223865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986225024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045913853,0.00867614,0.0007244653,0.04196852,0.0013755574,0.000056466706,0.0006214084,0.000033686505,0.9006299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7245506,0.0044648135,0.00086363975,0.006721785,0.00032144022,0.0000803763,0.00025044868,0.000060581828,0.26268616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954203,0.00074029976,0.00020686275,0.0005702852,0.0015864598,0.0014759044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966208,0.0010208898,0.0003804835,0.0003358514,0.0011138414,0.00052807655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018845065,0.00028154458,0.00043915233,0.0010942614,0.011560073,0.011512713,0.00089821615,0.0035168452,0.013217236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070107034,0.00045238313,0.00032666835,0.0016797938,0.01241662,0.0038158717,0.0030924957,0.00625604,0.0019727864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003273894,0.000015439491,0.0013582006,0.000051232808,0.0000054889842,0.00007822045,0.005706767,0.00010686065,0.00013897664,0.95193344,0.034102358,0.0064702975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027350852,0.000050674807,0.021166662,0.0010697708,0.000051308492,0.00015123408,0.011514811,0.00022377461,0.00053882203,0.07076381,0.8942978,0.00014393445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7317944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8492924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26820558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037284005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0506529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5395702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986301819","doi":"","title":"Paths to Justice and the Resolution of Consumer Problems: Findings from the 2014 Everyday Legal Problems and the Costs of Civil Justice in Canada National Survey","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Ethnic group; Value (mathematics); Resolution (logic); Civil rights; Dispute resolution; Legal culture","score_opus":0.024941541147955232,"score_gpt":0.26373705718055385,"score_spread":0.2387955160325986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986301819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98572457,0.00033105584,0.000052014067,0.0046546943,0.000012387045,0.000039348528,0.00028588183,0.000002165602,0.0088978885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99801815,0.00031956346,0.00007058397,0.00036804704,0.000004501876,0.000013947924,0.00010832814,0.0000035108694,0.0010933172],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921319,0.0019617102,0.00036302404,0.00037434697,0.0024375247,0.0027314683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9766698,0.005221908,0.00670219,0.00069092575,0.005336742,0.0053784675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004471081,0.00017610539,0.00035547945,0.0021350891,0.012254225,0.0047006225,0.002106021,0.0014462336,0.003683901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02550517,0.0004505292,0.00040919535,0.0038908934,0.006350393,0.00199555,0.0049585686,0.0033624521,0.00015775484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008639388,0.0003186604,0.85080117,0.000082540115,0.000051710886,0.00032620897,0.11802567,0.00028548166,0.00006596072,0.005770618,0.0053104805,0.018874982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010470858,0.000021348065,0.69698936,0.00015420424,0.000020269774,0.000084282874,0.29206967,0.00036694735,0.0000498035,0.0006777078,0.009518091,0.000037913007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97990006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99185246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047541104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047541104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07040591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3449365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986597370","doi":"","title":"Proving Intra-Racial Discrimination in the U.S. and Canada: The Room for Making the Artificial Distinction Between Genealogical Relatedness and Race","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Expansive; Interpretation (philosophy); Race (biology); Order (exchange); Root (linguistics); Judicial interpretation","score_opus":0.04709062148446246,"score_gpt":0.30936774023731195,"score_spread":0.2622771187528495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986597370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2733909,0.0048053893,0.014762922,0.17552854,0.00089704816,0.0002121818,0.00065408944,0.0001084573,0.5296405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9252544,0.0024514764,0.0064609055,0.043271318,0.0001891454,0.00009407233,0.00017664724,0.000044168,0.022057751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98853695,0.001852145,0.00030203306,0.0010779646,0.005418194,0.0028127416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98434967,0.0071239257,0.0009920996,0.0008727197,0.0052098413,0.0014517274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008620975,0.00039684447,0.0008739217,0.0020522566,0.021210836,0.008285041,0.0029889399,0.005857078,0.0037266165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028568134,0.0004039665,0.0006570541,0.0029730573,0.019990783,0.0044849343,0.007187984,0.011087071,0.0003442683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006292486,0.000046892543,0.019145606,0.000088638306,0.000059438837,0.0008572807,0.013469026,0.00064441445,0.0006018243,0.9220884,0.017177178,0.025758395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021029117,0.00013767721,0.060667824,0.0015866201,0.0004631891,0.00074585836,0.05358069,0.005768361,0.0059570847,0.48125094,0.38924003,0.0003914656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97124857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9814254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04997462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04997462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12756665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36259294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986616084","doi":"","title":"Professor Emeritus Kent McNeil to serve as the Law Foundation of Saskatchewan H. Robert Arscott Chair at University of Saskatchewan College of Law from July 1 to December 31","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Work (physics); George (robot)","score_opus":0.017812262862625574,"score_gpt":0.2742131930104344,"score_spread":0.25640093014780885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986616084","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006252555,0.011254792,0.0011695501,0.70663357,0.04331031,0.00035866065,0.0015117279,0.0006863353,0.22882248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008223601,0.0018974734,0.00033947907,0.03863793,0.0009699862,0.000056956233,0.00020683014,0.00007954196,0.9495882],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973086,0.0003607617,0.000082183564,0.0005405226,0.000847363,0.0008606503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983585,0.0008694579,0.00036326237,0.0003756103,0.0068258825,0.00798087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004258542,0.00058029714,0.0007174309,0.001623267,0.008604526,0.004968057,0.0014386538,0.00485363,0.22481017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00806995,0.0007163023,0.00046747082,0.0009628045,0.0016204509,0.0020555006,0.0032446324,0.0075418963,0.07962598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016586016,0.000023347977,0.00066585024,0.000017702949,0.0000026906193,0.00007921777,0.000065877764,0.000020446083,0.00012300885,0.0015684436,0.9882477,0.009169104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000131368615,0.000026684766,0.0028531488,0.0000947715,0.0000058182723,0.00019032488,0.00084668497,0.00007210331,0.00024452768,0.00058239576,0.99504954,0.000020810992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14411968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4177645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8558803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016128104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04825397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75206494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986989800","doi":"","title":"Robbed of Their Families'? Fathers' Rights Discourses in Canadian Parenting Law Reform Processes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law reform; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Family law; International human rights law","score_opus":0.01472167221316496,"score_gpt":0.26958811593031723,"score_spread":0.2548664437171523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986989800","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39424428,0.003820474,0.002524239,0.18768454,0.000643075,0.00010799299,0.00012227272,0.000062024985,0.41079104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97051716,0.00053496694,0.00044642313,0.0055125216,0.000048484933,0.00003590074,0.00001423114,0.000034745655,0.022855522],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9796483,0.0067072343,0.00045501508,0.0017265452,0.0038864352,0.0075764465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9740966,0.01575885,0.001147097,0.0007047037,0.0044449875,0.003847869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021687157,0.0006340064,0.0007493875,0.0027136947,0.09226331,0.020184258,0.004270284,0.012824588,0.010230992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04454466,0.0010733063,0.00041655047,0.0032535999,0.053545173,0.008356735,0.012371257,0.017699875,0.0003400134],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001770818,0.000021087746,0.0016949783,0.00002459485,0.0000042758684,0.00025187142,0.6215082,0.000086484746,0.00016341577,0.36357072,0.006385091,0.0062715905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036657322,0.000021785001,0.007420422,0.00037954265,0.00004120389,0.00013874496,0.7250576,0.00030276316,0.00046535008,0.034604885,0.23142731,0.0001037682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9775403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9850406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16703545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16703545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21657817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96612084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987230599","doi":"","title":"Sexual Assault in Canada : Law, legal pratice and women’s activism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; State (computer science); Sexual violence; Face (sociological concept); Victory; Legislation; Law reform","score_opus":0.07506848413431826,"score_gpt":0.3842518239960574,"score_spread":0.3091833398617391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987230599","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15363577,0.09847058,0.0006428103,0.25523406,0.002771825,0.00012556082,0.000572697,0.00007528733,0.4884714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7617274,0.055801243,0.0006630968,0.024000434,0.0004408264,0.00007583755,0.00024830372,0.000061049155,0.1569818],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716103,0.0002477415,0.000046026067,0.00013083765,0.0011340773,0.0012803817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973315,0.0005602669,0.00016158038,0.000031800744,0.0006465715,0.001268394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001227588,0.0003638562,0.0003641333,0.002415328,0.033864457,0.010304439,0.0016022773,0.0030499366,0.0067270664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030904748,0.0003808293,0.0003225146,0.0049614985,0.014942854,0.001869535,0.003039602,0.003984126,0.0002971695],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003163789,0.00008558376,0.014079921,0.00046182118,0.000017539416,0.0012741094,0.28613663,0.0005422039,0.00056777574,0.3000221,0.3004657,0.096314915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005928763,0.000017045837,0.030160753,0.0005641558,0.00001065655,0.00024632996,0.14686167,0.00019295921,0.00012267046,0.0038266822,0.81794447,0.00004671212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99670994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20667356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20667356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30839667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9201462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987237254","doi":"","title":"Social Enterprise, Law and Legal Education","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social enterprise; Social economy; Revenue; Product (mathematics); Population; Enterprise software; Social policy; Legal research","score_opus":0.03285351891063463,"score_gpt":0.3718201482977051,"score_spread":0.33896662938707045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987237254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013080786,0.032430995,0.0039709494,0.18811549,0.0024618052,0.000041764448,0.00003107061,0.000038453094,0.75982857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70858115,0.038005013,0.0033717465,0.063658364,0.0062232516,0.00016167582,0.00006718468,0.0000704577,0.17986114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968798,0.00165314,0.000102590646,0.00025489106,0.00044512967,0.0006644232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956512,0.0030540621,0.0003647282,0.00013014897,0.000280189,0.000519708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002614945,0.000311545,0.00029459485,0.0015291652,0.0097562885,0.0076983827,0.00079626427,0.006547253,0.013695332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005053806,0.00014692206,0.0003313301,0.0013586282,0.033766724,0.008206603,0.0048334543,0.0070140236,0.001201172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013936495,0.00002224192,0.00014728763,0.000033063778,7.282322e-7,0.000055458346,0.0037984895,0.000047940255,0.000014571355,0.9801149,0.008727341,0.0070365276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049422624,0.000021343316,0.00074460055,0.0005056877,0.0000017607227,0.000117609896,0.010807701,0.00016832483,0.000054713295,0.43937367,0.5481881,0.000011605797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011981932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017321518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013695332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00735499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007834707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053364456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989327346","doi":"","title":"Anchoring Lifeline Criminal Jurisprudence: Making the Leap from Theory to Critical Race-Inspired Jurisprudence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Power (physics); Criminal offence; Criminal law; Race (biology)","score_opus":0.04501025431994587,"score_gpt":0.36368664785370053,"score_spread":0.31867639353375465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989327346","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02306884,0.008138571,0.06376788,0.62343436,0.0028922544,0.00011719843,0.00006405875,0.0001985204,0.27831832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9034199,0.0031050527,0.020129714,0.043711554,0.0012819213,0.00018136525,0.000046856283,0.00029370288,0.027829949],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9756674,0.014786983,0.0005049858,0.0022689032,0.004346662,0.002425001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9737795,0.016054211,0.0011372616,0.0020572506,0.004446271,0.0025255638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029301392,0.0008170288,0.00092158327,0.003148687,0.019200025,0.023957709,0.0046590576,0.015234328,0.0051340475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032056548,0.00056861195,0.0006754163,0.0016642989,0.13358471,0.01782928,0.012736634,0.021239594,0.000949507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038447024,0.000006966333,0.000078491226,0.000024662371,0.0000018019929,0.000039957366,0.013643146,0.00014855961,0.00006293308,0.9803689,0.002628593,0.002992041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013131994,0.000016231736,0.00022362178,0.00027895175,0.000006533413,0.000034478693,0.0135831125,0.0007934427,0.00022947478,0.81135875,0.17343344,0.000028866494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22001122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1916917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22001122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06252786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055238694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45367348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989809335","doi":"","title":"Canada and the Rule of Law: 150 Years After Confederation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Rule of law; Legislation; Human rights; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.016663194888243364,"score_gpt":0.27186265242218255,"score_spread":0.2551994575339392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989809335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05581327,0.085533984,0.0012013001,0.33517417,0.00652247,0.000047203823,0.0007519409,0.00007946324,0.51487625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.765924,0.027155945,0.0010623191,0.047295384,0.0011213459,0.000050224375,0.0004381093,0.00017655325,0.15677613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98903066,0.0009715594,0.00020817773,0.0007755682,0.00429993,0.0047141747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924717,0.0012680086,0.0003641958,0.00027382746,0.0034930385,0.0021292823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043656183,0.00030615347,0.00064539426,0.0019702455,0.03484072,0.025570525,0.0019909116,0.0059816167,0.0060304604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011037249,0.0003242525,0.00046962584,0.0042228824,0.03203191,0.0062568286,0.0037911604,0.010381747,0.0005996124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027114691,0.000020860594,0.0020657803,0.000071932576,0.000010983591,0.00021025157,0.042870235,0.0001263692,0.00011791853,0.7748206,0.14831138,0.031346552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056968743,0.000007525484,0.0056618773,0.00026361947,0.000009422649,0.00005280123,0.025702095,0.00007020214,0.00009860741,0.016403886,0.95167947,0.00004479123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9900893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99442875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82069886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17930111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2608888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9518944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990007197","doi":"","title":"A comparative jurisdictional analysis of the criminalisation of the sexual transmission/exposure of HIV: a new legislative framework","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Government (linguistics); Pretext; Circumstantial evidence; Legislation; Tort; Work (physics); Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.12328689299599799,"score_gpt":0.393998680937655,"score_spread":0.270711787941657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990007197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43441615,0.004229597,0.007128241,0.0074459896,0.00012694279,0.000094774834,0.000087660424,0.000015031882,0.54645556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99516547,0.000936194,0.0010201057,0.0003367744,0.00003073531,0.000052747688,0.000026240863,0.000006933205,0.0024248103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893038,0.0072258897,0.00022150169,0.00057409954,0.0017532748,0.0009214067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98846835,0.007697321,0.0013221055,0.00062729226,0.0014937008,0.00039121657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006739657,0.00016831698,0.00041646036,0.005662974,0.0081229955,0.009819618,0.0017131575,0.0021341708,0.0057630516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012800144,0.00027816326,0.0004347223,0.004474143,0.0249679,0.009376255,0.007147528,0.0025472569,0.00021822084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000081801,0.000018554638,0.001256609,0.000037465103,0.0000044006747,0.00014139479,0.033574775,0.00012804581,0.000120252014,0.9613275,0.0002467185,0.003136091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033593595,0.00024329514,0.043256905,0.0017782794,0.00014123577,0.0010726013,0.4604264,0.0029035206,0.0010846519,0.30139935,0.18755771,0.00010247398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0299599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03336853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0299599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011046992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007847828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080151916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990053523","doi":"","title":"The Companies We Keep: Corporate Governance for a Democratic Society","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Pretext; Circumstantial evidence; Subpoena; Subject (documents); Gloom","score_opus":0.058364127877910725,"score_gpt":0.3088698155957502,"score_spread":0.2505056877178395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990053523","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008147923,0.038422506,0.0060817883,0.4874427,0.0021753304,0.000064738066,0.00008048589,0.0001720559,0.45741245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6784176,0.028540915,0.005261071,0.061768707,0.0020127806,0.0002123362,0.00016305149,0.00018801451,0.22343557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99356234,0.002311729,0.000105571766,0.00041302084,0.0022833368,0.0013240952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973847,0.0009491337,0.000305529,0.00023516646,0.00048204913,0.0006433794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041286144,0.00038365222,0.0003171524,0.0006701461,0.009051389,0.019349441,0.0010177594,0.003961969,0.0032475838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062529757,0.00039036453,0.00017973215,0.0017936315,0.016077412,0.008146889,0.004016837,0.006031801,0.0009047454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063914317,0.00001383231,0.00033863386,0.000040710747,0.0000063707166,0.00005157759,0.013004377,0.00028318833,0.00009268741,0.81025267,0.15801172,0.017897973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066834486,0.000009862314,0.00071727834,0.00013970633,0.000006412281,0.000026882692,0.007302228,0.00016570628,0.00008048124,0.100841336,0.8906908,0.000012699271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.121776156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20433284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121776156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015923807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028602023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24213469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990130995","doi":"","title":"Constitutionalism and Exclusion","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Subject (documents); Derogation; Context (archaeology); Legitimacy","score_opus":0.03826820113509239,"score_gpt":0.30754471040311776,"score_spread":0.2692765092680254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990130995","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07273585,0.005524406,0.016616408,0.022219192,0.00034064704,0.00006463349,0.00014481158,0.000040937237,0.88231295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9511848,0.0013570497,0.0018625146,0.001655132,0.00019794615,0.000095273885,0.00008519748,0.00004247337,0.043519575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934016,0.0034057826,0.00018771147,0.0009947538,0.0010397497,0.00097042765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669385,0.001738718,0.00030420654,0.00054524874,0.00041474323,0.00030327152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045763203,0.0003339333,0.0006081588,0.0015730964,0.008428936,0.0067894976,0.0008089044,0.001894191,0.013608451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007789443,0.00017545222,0.0006809741,0.0018621881,0.034725618,0.006451855,0.008183377,0.0033133815,0.00074030133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004503536,0.0000030970211,0.00023146781,0.0000115765915,0.0000015527539,0.000019227375,0.001413908,0.000052642456,0.000026565072,0.99606556,0.00052176183,0.0016481037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014574847,0.000013749349,0.0011581482,0.00011150635,0.0000065884906,0.00007128563,0.0029605897,0.00021559084,0.00015504395,0.89438075,0.100902036,0.000010126645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012783525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011704648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013608451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0082324995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007469748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059731305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990469418","doi":"","title":"Diana Ginn: Resolving Conflicts Between Freedom of Religion and LGBTQ Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Freedom of religion; Autonomy; Supreme court; Religious freedom; First amendment","score_opus":0.02912035656091781,"score_gpt":0.2963427770853943,"score_spread":0.2672224205244765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990469418","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038425325,0.012749244,0.00012947645,0.8764109,0.09550467,0.000028334665,0.000054896715,0.00003092231,0.014707334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014146197,0.023707004,0.0006752061,0.6386475,0.1772811,0.00008739287,0.00007591868,0.00017305207,0.14520667],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967192,0.0008005185,0.0001826608,0.00039414948,0.0015343396,0.00036924446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98692375,0.0063910824,0.0004926366,0.00023693881,0.0035813935,0.0023741866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043444997,0.00076305267,0.0007970573,0.0017637056,0.01308709,0.010639352,0.0032454683,0.01265729,0.013330021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02310844,0.00048027412,0.0003792054,0.0016026397,0.0074164774,0.0042907596,0.003382965,0.017734911,0.0033281788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001669248,0.000003883047,0.00005519199,0.000023434974,0.000001100462,0.000053589705,0.0004666712,0.000009915263,0.000015967995,0.0021119907,0.994183,0.0030735454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003626415,0.0000033308434,0.00024004279,0.00015554624,0.000003527522,0.00005834353,0.0014333746,0.000030657186,0.000039084316,0.001764791,0.99625874,0.000009051312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2022157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4258007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2022157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010899639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024208883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40207738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991709971","doi":"","title":"If I should fall behind. An examination of constitutional guarantees of socio-economic rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OAR@UM (University of Malta)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disenchantment; Legislature; Politics; Core (optical fiber); Social rights; Human rights; Welfare rights; Property rights","score_opus":0.029095073187821292,"score_gpt":0.2618446361205449,"score_spread":0.23274956293272364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991709971","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008965994,0.011499266,0.015538414,0.6364073,0.0057267663,0.00006342865,0.00016997049,0.00008142101,0.32154748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6729697,0.011783151,0.014648786,0.19671948,0.006477616,0.00033423197,0.0001843693,0.0001955561,0.096687034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921996,0.0028169504,0.00035827514,0.001365395,0.0021917268,0.0010680311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986257,0.0072932467,0.0011211269,0.0022486912,0.0023273253,0.0007525573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016499128,0.00033256243,0.00054374844,0.00087504444,0.0075855283,0.011141088,0.0015888083,0.010027459,0.007536127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03580062,0.00029383472,0.00056646497,0.00092634506,0.046386167,0.017623516,0.004520211,0.014966418,0.0016274529],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034721263,0.000003811007,0.00010492761,0.000012638382,0.0000017055455,0.00001556341,0.00086877367,0.000025075191,0.000028108605,0.98912686,0.0071513043,0.0026578365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010492837,0.000029079996,0.00056051294,0.0003896672,0.000009251237,0.00007207046,0.0034622687,0.00015174184,0.00032023466,0.6617464,0.33322126,0.000026937365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01278125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011830673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016499128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046978416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074730404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08725679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991810526","doi":"","title":"An Indefensible Amendment to Medical Assistance in Dying Legislation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Government (linguistics); Amendment; Government regulation","score_opus":0.04006655517252452,"score_gpt":0.3249893987320307,"score_spread":0.2849228435595062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991810526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02530088,0.0031769169,0.009791376,0.23473357,0.005688575,0.00017537257,0.0004462542,0.00017028795,0.7205168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48897377,0.0014675499,0.01112064,0.28727937,0.0027548638,0.00042529812,0.0002813039,0.000070967166,0.20762633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809503,0.0043975753,0.001133936,0.0017943552,0.007857088,0.003866729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890133,0.005876767,0.00057454244,0.0009864797,0.0026653397,0.00088358007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019091202,0.00044568954,0.0005726036,0.0008328505,0.010429882,0.0059744962,0.0030440455,0.016388021,0.0037139745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02411791,0.0007070508,0.0011693087,0.0006173657,0.018612724,0.0034695594,0.0049323486,0.014710522,0.0011058036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015111967,0.000026511781,0.00014630707,0.000015111678,0.0000029575815,0.00006280245,0.0015242167,0.000060686365,0.00025090738,0.9751184,0.020372031,0.0024050842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009463519,0.00009382015,0.0019577336,0.0004268157,0.000052528198,0.00018310169,0.0012078864,0.00046298167,0.0010873186,0.17243645,0.821882,0.00011472906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15940186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23731181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15940186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011824041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031880867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31694806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991910898","doi":"","title":"International Human Rights and Canadian Law. Legal Commitment, Implementation and the Charter","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Charter; International human rights law; Legislation; International law","score_opus":0.05877469552339337,"score_gpt":0.34843835995346195,"score_spread":0.2896636644300686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991910898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013481278,0.021452952,0.0008774368,0.019085582,0.0010499822,0.000055645418,0.00023457466,0.00006248905,0.9558333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13310352,0.021770995,0.002185106,0.0071703196,0.0006474895,0.00017018686,0.00039685445,0.00018969899,0.8343657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975032,0.00022116308,0.00005210206,0.0002058084,0.0013531346,0.0006646923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864215,0.00037690348,0.000055650788,0.00008910884,0.00061529566,0.00022100865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020757192,0.0009853209,0.0005497335,0.003568516,0.013429247,0.015487645,0.0024581065,0.0056787436,0.027314192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005592688,0.0007346198,0.00033342847,0.007454445,0.016471528,0.006031015,0.002146466,0.006301901,0.0020554007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002905102,0.000008745893,0.000054194727,0.00002846152,8.191169e-7,0.000018908666,0.0020327764,0.00009711572,0.000015291907,0.85912603,0.12209308,0.016521705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008639992,0.0000048811253,0.0010482925,0.00036203634,0.0000075438597,0.000042321193,0.002471055,0.00021282776,0.00008190817,0.127495,0.8682355,0.000029914268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96913517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98191446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91682756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08317242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16212648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60346097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992732555","doi":"","title":"Measuring Judicial Activism on the Supreme Court of Canada: A Comment on Newfoundland (Treasury Board) v. Newfoundland Association of Public Employees","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial activism; Charter; Supreme court; Legislation; Judicial review; Legislature; Judicial independence; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.04258538527582147,"score_gpt":0.23429999410074406,"score_spread":0.19171460882492258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6992732555","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28984195,0.012842014,0.0008333111,0.5729277,0.0020113895,0.00027762205,0.0027508615,0.000116180665,0.118398964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7997201,0.0035597177,0.00077215256,0.15337537,0.0013757404,0.00015635,0.0006599446,0.00006959215,0.040310934],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9771986,0.002880618,0.00083258306,0.0025846998,0.009437435,0.0070661083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91501385,0.04930396,0.0055323844,0.0015095056,0.022959422,0.005680902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0143747665,0.0008419991,0.0007460649,0.004169268,0.042884115,0.015028047,0.0047125057,0.015016151,0.0030042687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05687198,0.001015958,0.0009259171,0.007624507,0.012055375,0.0031354108,0.0019578154,0.014496111,0.0003340626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043062304,0.00028540712,0.16299763,0.00050131633,0.00034253477,0.0024596571,0.10904975,0.00092242024,0.0018650212,0.104405165,0.57847315,0.03826733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001320486,0.00022167317,0.5172376,0.0011739327,0.0006497999,0.000252788,0.10884856,0.0013871125,0.003415909,0.0044400133,0.3616772,0.00056325505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99521685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8329582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16704178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14548694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96611345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995553836","doi":"","title":"Panel II: Droits humains/Human Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Racism; Politics; Indigenous; Civil rights; Race (biology); Metropolitan area","score_opus":0.06088509421868672,"score_gpt":0.2911112470644359,"score_spread":0.2302261528457492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995553836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041127526,0.01200813,0.00068957015,0.35441363,0.031158846,0.00571794,0.010818249,0.0002614559,0.58081955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011319481,0.00471987,0.0007740335,0.24906172,0.008219107,0.0027639235,0.002452193,0.00019973372,0.7204899],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918915,0.0008043999,0.0004053786,0.0014882869,0.0024829728,0.0029275073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847645,0.0042099017,0.00059206685,0.00077764585,0.0058841985,0.003771686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009754662,0.0017288695,0.0017032917,0.0020058919,0.014653089,0.011364356,0.004137083,0.053034265,0.08707458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015465722,0.0014794441,0.0017379723,0.0028922434,0.0036147593,0.0040104133,0.0039390726,0.021613088,0.032747794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000525253,0.0000612286,0.00027810194,0.00015054402,0.000005863984,0.000117437936,0.00018001115,0.00005018136,0.00024537285,0.0044873706,0.98954004,0.0048312335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006797808,0.000018264096,0.0026442157,0.0005270208,0.000012495089,0.000024461538,0.0004932797,0.000046078017,0.00013860612,0.0011637446,0.99482614,0.00003778026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4135597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5512035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4135597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01706735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06291747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.822305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995868210","doi":"","title":"The Prairie Province Epidemic: A Cry for the Meaningful Inclusion of the Indigenous Perspective into the Sentencing of Indigenous People and Gladue","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"University Library (University of Saskatchewan)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Criminal justice; Population; Inclusion (mineral); Sanctions; Economic Justice; Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.007924655172222827,"score_gpt":0.22358173037957987,"score_spread":0.21565707520735705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995868210","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07159897,0.013302258,0.0019420122,0.8483349,0.0017636565,0.000047303245,0.00016955218,0.00007824607,0.06276304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80147994,0.010533551,0.0049068294,0.13653338,0.000925224,0.00005293897,0.00015695744,0.00016438414,0.0452467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923125,0.0015037658,0.00020118494,0.00059508,0.0030350424,0.0023524053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903842,0.0035576061,0.0006054015,0.00047432806,0.002257296,0.0027211495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00941086,0.00030740848,0.00041272986,0.0011838413,0.021573408,0.009727772,0.0033604824,0.005396875,0.0043606986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017726233,0.00048168923,0.00042812782,0.0013602005,0.022353893,0.005304898,0.008205296,0.018992871,0.0003128448],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078398545,0.000057717672,0.02036077,0.00041402923,0.00006459858,0.0014004051,0.271634,0.0005236673,0.0010685569,0.43183553,0.1667659,0.10579645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019124915,0.0000532499,0.035218734,0.0015820637,0.000039870087,0.00062826194,0.27599302,0.00046681677,0.00043712728,0.028713336,0.65673393,0.0001144138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95170784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98264873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04829216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044340145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13766639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32171178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995996080","doi":"","title":"Professors Philip Girard (Osgoode), Jim Phillips (U of T) &amp; R. Blake Brown (SMU) receive Canadian Law and Society Association’s W. Wesley Pue Book Prize Honourable Mention for A History of Law in Canada, Volume One","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal history; Power (physics); Settlement (finance); Comparative law; Criminal law; Politics; Civil law (Civil law); Political history","score_opus":0.03220626347585392,"score_gpt":0.25131355385406073,"score_spread":0.2191072903782068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995996080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00166392,0.08447181,0.0013802797,0.08236581,0.013582313,0.000073054296,0.0008800146,0.0005003919,0.8150823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026273935,0.010723302,0.0004181783,0.0018130959,0.00038611892,0.000005493176,0.00007872068,0.00008237254,0.9838652],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937195,0.00003604913,0.00001346644,0.0000824648,0.00039937487,0.000096798154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870694,0.00012500597,0.000046338522,0.000036425572,0.00066941476,0.00041591533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006450702,0.00046722582,0.00038891664,0.0019688564,0.00519203,0.004355952,0.0006132661,0.0017548224,0.18006651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015396051,0.00049261487,0.00024370804,0.0026942613,0.0019228652,0.0026366825,0.0010686636,0.0015259032,0.05965333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038364974,0.000004672267,0.00017308968,0.00003303682,8.8797015e-7,0.000029701043,0.00017762546,0.000017097973,0.0000775832,0.007162165,0.9528504,0.039469857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.90515e-7,0.0000012988189,0.00022276986,0.000025364137,4.7359202e-7,0.000027732287,0.0001731492,0.0000074609266,0.0000221842,0.00031677625,0.9992003,0.0000020289942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28317717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7219914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71682286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008586061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010005892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6023825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996009423","doi":"","title":"The Principles of Fundamental Justice and the â Societal Consensusâ Requirement","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Norm (philosophy); Supreme court; Economic Justice; Competence (human resources); State (computer science)","score_opus":0.038824583403837355,"score_gpt":0.314959789569247,"score_spread":0.2761352061654096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996009423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016372748,0.0015152975,0.0496598,0.12540379,0.0008359573,0.00029623427,0.00024806004,0.000083636114,0.80558443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.852423,0.0009735935,0.051525563,0.031243535,0.00070892915,0.0009004973,0.00021641697,0.00011587843,0.061892517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9624599,0.01248235,0.0019908375,0.0034560172,0.0138787115,0.005732117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770247,0.008416741,0.0015718732,0.003265531,0.0075438935,0.0021772534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02870293,0.0005517159,0.0011938649,0.0017229288,0.017546985,0.014524198,0.003342613,0.013389278,0.0052014245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032684233,0.00083742547,0.0012565312,0.001610996,0.062431246,0.008752145,0.007929141,0.01715269,0.0014462322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011969433,0.00000270575,0.000032314376,0.000004364359,0.000001304707,0.000010968105,0.0004294103,0.000052973057,0.000016779144,0.9976852,0.00103319,0.00072961504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014202371,0.000006591024,0.00026483202,0.000055584755,0.0000038076607,0.000029733283,0.000473358,0.00026660817,0.00010399049,0.96203935,0.03672405,0.000017903247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16616617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17582907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16616617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027127037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08151908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33039796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996078153","doi":"","title":"Reading Hutterian Brethren v Alberta in a Larger Constitutional Law Context","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Legislation; Government (linguistics); Constitution; Action (physics); Reading (process)","score_opus":0.020354639343733296,"score_gpt":0.2849770873174541,"score_spread":0.2646224479737208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996078153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044395786,0.013047076,0.0024997192,0.18099087,0.0017055816,0.00006752174,0.00047537909,0.00009240533,0.7567257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7695197,0.006249548,0.0030636725,0.08991205,0.0010433665,0.00006985911,0.00023642027,0.00007288896,0.12983249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971425,0.00067186577,0.000054283944,0.00039045452,0.0008430773,0.00089769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976082,0.0013713834,0.00010695731,0.00012599453,0.0004447859,0.00034271152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031358597,0.00043068698,0.00050047826,0.0016376886,0.016434405,0.011091417,0.0026600407,0.009577973,0.0071786894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005211288,0.0003528513,0.0004059635,0.0023104576,0.024138626,0.0039413967,0.0025459174,0.009710302,0.00043199683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007234092,0.000009795084,0.00033716043,0.00001579967,0.000002682016,0.00025100957,0.005927567,0.0002835814,0.00018436743,0.9693909,0.020619705,0.002970218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029754783,0.00002568915,0.007019003,0.00054236915,0.000034010147,0.00015959347,0.024869518,0.0007046017,0.00052344654,0.32540703,0.6405508,0.00013435184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95333225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97354794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0641035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0641035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054905735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4651056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996084860","doi":"","title":"Putting the Train of Environmental Protection on Track: Nova Scotia's Experiment in Using Legislation to Strengthen Environmental Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Nova scotia; Prosperity; Environmental law; Corporate governance; Environmental governance; Environmental policy","score_opus":0.059620474262709916,"score_gpt":0.2984791490399823,"score_spread":0.23885867477727238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996084860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9017596,0.00029095856,0.00024454153,0.01992804,0.00019270217,0.00021452957,0.00021476354,0.000023078974,0.07713176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96841174,0.00019216324,0.00034086543,0.0077947713,0.00001742269,0.0000893067,0.0000835535,0.000014479431,0.023055753],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962251,0.0013465002,0.00009328655,0.0003005557,0.00059667387,0.0014378121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99319386,0.0025563433,0.0004522536,0.00053246436,0.0013681931,0.0018968056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041733542,0.00022564299,0.00034737232,0.00042180705,0.014690361,0.0039541544,0.0012423913,0.0018979559,0.0032151253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00979478,0.00030907357,0.00028780164,0.00070645,0.004568581,0.0010808845,0.0041844985,0.0036854062,0.00033823552],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004751541,0.0030293039,0.30091202,0.00055771304,0.00037976456,0.017331513,0.2845487,0.0053041284,0.014016533,0.07191223,0.14887364,0.1483829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010763181,0.0015150353,0.4410338,0.00043916935,0.00019987932,0.00048907124,0.22492248,0.0026568621,0.0032923429,0.0054840553,0.3186485,0.00024245038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9565175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98789716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043482482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030694984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0484361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22270876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996101417","doi":"","title":"Protecting Rights and Freedoms: Essays on the Charter's Place in Canada's Political, Legal, and Intellectual life","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Human rights; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.0289928357020444,"score_gpt":0.24269668936006955,"score_spread":0.21370385365802516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996101417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028857607,0.03350001,0.0026578107,0.37863952,0.0043077413,0.000090932524,0.00029022968,0.000040804913,0.5516153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7815754,0.015607825,0.0016131395,0.05809238,0.0024734226,0.00015247436,0.00013597481,0.00025819163,0.14009129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925249,0.0018972608,0.00016275377,0.0006226822,0.0020301729,0.0027621095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883632,0.0070343306,0.0002956385,0.0003309517,0.0027193453,0.0012565595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008955099,0.0010347402,0.001058641,0.003271979,0.05214378,0.02412143,0.004152525,0.016142963,0.0060749273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018689701,0.00063658727,0.0008033633,0.0079726875,0.09694494,0.009548534,0.0063221995,0.016875036,0.0004115147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013253053,0.000014818854,0.00020607177,0.00005514243,0.0000062123863,0.000114853065,0.09684119,0.00013887815,0.00006114308,0.8212628,0.076705396,0.004580408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003246988,0.000007146617,0.002565809,0.001083778,0.000028001734,0.00008653022,0.1603085,0.00019041741,0.00023954808,0.14146085,0.6939267,0.000070164584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9689238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9783051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11420953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11420953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16140313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.828652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996569490","doi":"","title":"A second lecture on agnosticism by the Lord Bishop of Ontario, delivered in Chirst Church, Ottawa.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agnosticism; Order (exchange); Courage; False accusation; Precept; Race (biology)","score_opus":0.007341863030220408,"score_gpt":0.19828060156906155,"score_spread":0.19093873853884114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996569490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040291464,0.28487957,0.0010096983,0.14318003,0.036353678,0.00022049283,0.0020508638,0.00022157842,0.5280549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01562269,0.01813917,0.00035644608,0.006541632,0.0011970528,0.00003258252,0.00026385993,0.00010519121,0.95774144],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991849,0.00012043724,0.000029052708,0.000113974085,0.00031922295,0.00023240913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993789,0.00010125042,0.000032363736,0.000041753534,0.00022892462,0.00021661191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007377115,0.0012150164,0.00051359186,0.0012066892,0.010498048,0.0029398215,0.0011794745,0.002751648,0.079492025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015420736,0.00088033365,0.00044941631,0.0013484322,0.004822338,0.0022499966,0.0018553231,0.0032478184,0.012298365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003249052,0.000016311336,0.00031441153,0.00013503856,0.0000057717607,0.00013011138,0.0019232106,0.000056964098,0.0003016627,0.010628901,0.9724674,0.013987718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004826095,0.000004792156,0.0015617503,0.00011481197,0.000002390567,0.000035962636,0.0008774057,0.000012839159,0.00005679985,0.0008613642,0.996458,0.00000917547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8036684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9617968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19633162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040450923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022114404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39497566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996724077","doi":"","title":"The “stiff-necked parson” and the “stiff-necked” state: religious freedom and the protection of State power and authority","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Legitimacy; Appeal; Interpretation (philosophy); Power (physics); State (computer science); Reading (process); Balance (ability)","score_opus":0.028179083143507727,"score_gpt":0.28931003250381593,"score_spread":0.26113094936030823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996724077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04139155,0.01557722,0.0024042623,0.14998017,0.0011057144,0.000029433342,0.00010948701,0.000029964556,0.78937227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8795835,0.005080247,0.00075424695,0.0113583915,0.000587614,0.000021197875,0.000041517913,0.000032504046,0.102540754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991117,0.0003269459,0.000010776561,0.000062455576,0.00024830145,0.00023977384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995491,0.00020920027,0.000048853366,0.000041202227,0.0000669871,0.000084668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079062127,0.0002000558,0.00012676315,0.00038266237,0.008638439,0.0057276664,0.00068973674,0.002181833,0.0030871066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017934282,0.00013197439,0.00014037835,0.0006604708,0.033996653,0.0019369066,0.0015377655,0.0031396912,0.00028211207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067741807,0.00000383337,0.00025584846,0.0000221261,0.0000019410038,0.000056419995,0.009498371,0.0001247102,0.00007576683,0.95539165,0.029842421,0.004720253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015413043,0.000010844772,0.006676016,0.00030999907,0.000010788388,0.000071550116,0.025500352,0.00047360815,0.00033843893,0.34519634,0.6213692,0.000027366441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50633335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6764547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50633335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016758904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015809946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997148343","doi":"","title":"Unappealing: An Assessment of the Limits on Appeal Rights in Canada's New Refugee Determination System","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Appeal; Human rights; Asylum seeker; Refugee law","score_opus":0.025547825335198643,"score_gpt":0.31529533452203473,"score_spread":0.2897475091868361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997148343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6275668,0.0016769229,0.0013424227,0.044589266,0.00016251767,0.00033515785,0.00048873265,0.000054811724,0.3237833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97994196,0.0004434804,0.00055525976,0.004507489,0.00003206694,0.00008404883,0.00007064222,0.000023079421,0.014341878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9604764,0.004318295,0.0008072612,0.0014891832,0.01712523,0.015783735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94849753,0.016581915,0.0016225035,0.0018116741,0.020727403,0.010758955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019100018,0.00035094444,0.00096240826,0.0046767057,0.040741008,0.02276719,0.00708944,0.0061601317,0.009334405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059129935,0.00089226867,0.0009659762,0.004490637,0.021267222,0.0051311334,0.010059052,0.011505366,0.00037174602],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021466985,0.00030789917,0.06794394,0.00018194503,0.00008758162,0.0011753087,0.0917932,0.0022124292,0.0011055296,0.75525296,0.031990506,0.04773406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019860345,0.00025768625,0.32153213,0.0013088853,0.00030551007,0.00054940884,0.29523164,0.0074891495,0.0015881906,0.10111764,0.26987547,0.0005456636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99016577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99717027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17327937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17327937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32648823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95887876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999148761","doi":"","title":"The codification of rights in the Australian and New Zealand Charters: the Canadian lessons","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Human rights; Work (physics); Legislature","score_opus":0.15080536810146447,"score_gpt":0.33499104937160795,"score_spread":0.18418568127014348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999148761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115559265,0.008479508,0.0032600972,0.09462886,0.00064954924,0.0001437598,0.0001842743,0.000053191332,0.77704155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8314269,0.006323376,0.004064858,0.0059837783,0.00019003908,0.00008259075,0.00010594894,0.0001086394,0.1517139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903032,0.002272789,0.000338308,0.00096061436,0.0037104576,0.0024145998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98046505,0.007830412,0.0008156838,0.002252778,0.006361218,0.002274803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016362347,0.00046162016,0.0007759676,0.0028181847,0.020097634,0.021769464,0.0035040365,0.005415772,0.009488527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032292005,0.0007781197,0.0005121688,0.0051022144,0.044343714,0.013315671,0.0055921124,0.009387379,0.00043472124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002835749,0.000030389047,0.00094103726,0.000046684538,0.000006133077,0.00012374272,0.076141246,0.00023983349,0.00015685313,0.8583901,0.01783489,0.046060737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006159172,0.00005014659,0.019474497,0.0010184256,0.000037369704,0.000190166,0.11135317,0.0011751355,0.000537908,0.18296815,0.6829616,0.00017187833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9832917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98650116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10972436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10972436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16205922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7961097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999408820","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Change and Constitutional Amendment: A Canadian Conundrum","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Government (linguistics); Constitutional law; Legislation; Legislature","score_opus":0.04087634617059131,"score_gpt":0.27955000907245603,"score_spread":0.2386736629018647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999408820","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008171559,0.03593611,0.0038109103,0.5232168,0.0032835498,0.000065590786,0.00028989845,0.00009006881,0.42513546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6524704,0.032108262,0.008245708,0.13265674,0.0041417372,0.0001239135,0.00024077494,0.00029669423,0.16971573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97661126,0.006245988,0.00077879115,0.0035558594,0.00765769,0.005150488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96534824,0.016879955,0.0009379068,0.0023513504,0.011287456,0.0031951293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024143277,0.00077264535,0.0018152066,0.0070165778,0.039497133,0.0334294,0.0072022015,0.02371575,0.023465183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05409459,0.0011504584,0.001294119,0.010341023,0.0925771,0.016281929,0.00764971,0.023648199,0.0011286072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011181654,0.000013551432,0.00015223061,0.000028275439,0.000005328197,0.000027228267,0.0017815079,0.0001622766,0.000022455235,0.96064425,0.029636888,0.0075147618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063180356,0.000011838293,0.0019860629,0.0005111695,0.000041586707,0.000045387824,0.0065791383,0.00086204056,0.0001560496,0.52889353,0.46072525,0.00012474245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9796292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98258084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17569655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17569655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29312658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9560752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999440925","doi":"","title":"Comparative analysis of constitutional law mechanism for human rights protection in Canada and Russia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Ratification; Right to property; Constitution; Convention; Linguistic rights","score_opus":0.03403400914910921,"score_gpt":0.3006650207599732,"score_spread":0.266631011610864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999440925","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43346485,0.0036337755,0.005005923,0.0061556473,0.00009466951,0.00023295585,0.0007968715,0.00007970437,0.5505356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98362076,0.0010749422,0.0013544591,0.00026193235,0.000012320487,0.000043176013,0.00021311121,0.000022052107,0.013397137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99291116,0.00086100603,0.00015677692,0.00050064706,0.0029838448,0.0025864802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99344987,0.0017058407,0.0004948152,0.00038545253,0.003388098,0.0005759082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031343962,0.00019595792,0.00052313326,0.0055573382,0.010535974,0.006892598,0.0014936883,0.001088821,0.010060401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012058317,0.000277072,0.0006050469,0.005366199,0.0057508247,0.001629222,0.0017903569,0.0016076503,0.00034200787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044485252,0.0000242482,0.011775544,0.000077231896,0.000037924183,0.0002468401,0.0054988274,0.0012093262,0.0005681474,0.96180487,0.0028737483,0.015838768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017584527,0.00010870066,0.3059699,0.000972455,0.0005535273,0.0006646738,0.052162934,0.009946611,0.003924071,0.12596941,0.49927714,0.0002746975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9552494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9610143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09170458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09170458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09471909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6653664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999461094","doi":"","title":"Conscience and rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Charter; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Face (sociological concept); Buckingham; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.02582811944723843,"score_gpt":0.331058402861469,"score_spread":0.30523028341423053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999461094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014534564,0.04314926,0.00085888227,0.13330084,0.019319745,0.000024913319,0.000092602706,0.000048728954,0.80175155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12461719,0.04729039,0.001002964,0.08988921,0.046859786,0.00017622973,0.00029295156,0.00016129963,0.6897099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978529,0.0008385899,0.00007778848,0.00029737668,0.0005840393,0.00034925705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987746,0.00062126183,0.00007802125,0.00018820875,0.00016664436,0.00017130785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017486786,0.000661167,0.0005087977,0.0010202277,0.0055999532,0.011157978,0.0010918311,0.0040856632,0.03332017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043514525,0.00015326455,0.0003542301,0.001073544,0.009998276,0.005775521,0.0038608047,0.0069464887,0.00570031],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005248735,0.000009781065,0.00010115605,0.000050541887,0.0000017577037,0.00003661003,0.0014576142,0.000032393204,0.00003017962,0.7017603,0.27012378,0.02639063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018984689,0.0000051490897,0.00026866008,0.00015784752,7.4255684e-7,0.000038193455,0.0007316057,0.000022783659,0.00002039235,0.05043857,0.94831043,0.0000035915427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054790433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00781725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03332017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003539159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039495016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11146706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999538060","doi":"","title":"Contact and Christianisation: Reassessing Purported English Loanwords in Old Norse&#13;\\n","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Circumstantial evidence; Headline; Subject (documents); Nasalization; Context (archaeology); Pretext","score_opus":0.02593023147573858,"score_gpt":0.25902231669104264,"score_spread":0.23309208521530406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999538060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9768505,0.0013532747,0.0006375218,0.0007162241,0.000081260085,0.000014525982,0.00008609385,0.000010148471,0.020250395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893657,0.001084857,0.0005666246,0.00016008283,0.000037187783,0.000018646197,0.00012624238,0.000045612156,0.008595142],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993037,0.0003203644,0.00006335938,0.00009096662,0.00015288693,0.00006876115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99724776,0.0019082492,0.00025891018,0.0002080479,0.00028981743,0.000087212225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012838715,0.00025942994,0.0003830381,0.0019203356,0.0044171996,0.0031803257,0.00037286422,0.00058766257,0.0039013787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045976616,0.0002167899,0.00010271754,0.0020230291,0.005580727,0.0035585554,0.0034334182,0.0012494535,0.00045191462],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008912207,0.000030412035,0.014494125,0.00019594005,0.0000067320325,0.0015049817,0.9328663,0.000033932123,0.002677108,0.02891711,0.0016597173,0.017524593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073696306,0.00007184528,0.06535377,0.00053194014,0.000016012511,0.0022028717,0.70167345,0.00024375325,0.0038812072,0.004947201,0.22102481,0.0000457232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049071256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017612547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049071256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012638981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008032431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01305145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999910506","doi":"","title":"The Domestic Implementation of International Law: A Canadian Case Study","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Charter; Right to property; Reservation of rights; Linguistic rights; International law","score_opus":0.025044373108454115,"score_gpt":0.3499661517367276,"score_spread":0.32492177862827354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999910506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45810983,0.0038506647,0.0023012685,0.020864604,0.00018730745,0.0004441411,0.0005473678,0.000041951997,0.5136529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537202,0.006271998,0.0023383307,0.0034782114,0.000038205144,0.0001729591,0.00023077131,0.00003927857,0.033710085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927007,0.0018303214,0.00014970516,0.00040722714,0.0018334555,0.003078632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99607545,0.0013718022,0.0003041724,0.00025023308,0.0012280238,0.00077023194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046266513,0.0007882152,0.00075319706,0.0034051535,0.048906084,0.007633258,0.0031831749,0.005915632,0.0060035954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008670504,0.0005068057,0.0008090205,0.011837437,0.011887579,0.0026827739,0.006806755,0.005180742,0.00045600868],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009638883,0.0004681985,0.022381864,0.00038295603,0.000038430513,0.02134913,0.26571432,0.002187631,0.0006310353,0.58940595,0.04650603,0.05083805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008122996,0.000115614006,0.027710468,0.0008095222,0.00011052996,0.00382437,0.5647193,0.002680832,0.0007226889,0.010749278,0.3883207,0.00015540585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9815856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99073595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12894648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12894648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09164795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9355766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999963545","doi":"","title":"Disability and Performance Standards under the Ontario Human Rights Code","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Code (set theory); Legislation; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.032765262315578476,"score_gpt":0.29658363127635945,"score_spread":0.263818368960781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999963545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02691257,0.001156267,0.0016854595,0.024299132,0.0005398727,0.00039817306,0.0037931358,0.00013414293,0.94108135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32192048,0.0014160889,0.005628461,0.010208782,0.00028058598,0.0007586157,0.0022958184,0.00019864095,0.6572925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826423,0.0015229208,0.00081594166,0.0007017381,0.008884546,0.005432555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813991,0.0023599982,0.00082127296,0.0012564793,0.011125858,0.0030373256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006535013,0.0005637809,0.0005284111,0.003159731,0.017136859,0.008744681,0.0024721106,0.0063330703,0.017496929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021699835,0.0009396309,0.0006691135,0.0035539626,0.007765954,0.0022970745,0.003585939,0.0045724404,0.0029636673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057183595,0.00011707235,0.009733712,0.00009503394,0.000015005639,0.00012572037,0.00851687,0.0005698585,0.000394111,0.7643829,0.19312727,0.022865107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006519198,0.000045028115,0.07053129,0.00042661492,0.000033685763,0.00009294057,0.00725068,0.0007047613,0.000346919,0.044965163,0.8753805,0.00015714452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9790773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99108607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06615111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06615111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23129426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47996217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000347197","doi":"","title":"Everyday Legal Problems and the Cost of Justice in Canada: Infographic","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Infographic; Economic Justice; Everyday life; Commission; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.018370470269097324,"score_gpt":0.2534970870235546,"score_spread":0.23512661675445728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000347197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8665129,0.008623155,0.0001400112,0.048236057,0.00014689947,0.00003937791,0.0023900643,0.000013148126,0.073898464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899316,0.0030913444,0.00007356083,0.0009938278,0.000039443952,0.000008130261,0.00027198214,0.0000071593813,0.005583043],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984273,0.00019064959,0.00005344419,0.000075532735,0.00046937267,0.0007836972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912348,0.0018259635,0.0013231809,0.00015516604,0.0024629347,0.0029979674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009678639,0.00016557098,0.00030067054,0.004136081,0.012407133,0.0074936636,0.0016649109,0.0019111207,0.012574655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011620698,0.0002657492,0.00027152093,0.009597932,0.0051857014,0.0033262575,0.0025799456,0.0028467013,0.00022921477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016761415,0.00040321748,0.57290655,0.00040251747,0.00010125326,0.0013085144,0.14580457,0.001358853,0.00011705573,0.079342626,0.07451417,0.12357298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019385358,0.000033245808,0.53120226,0.0006956503,0.000081658305,0.0003966263,0.35817736,0.0011668697,0.000110705914,0.008823535,0.09917416,0.00011858155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9961289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99862194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082221985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.082221985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.112842225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.596565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000515459","doi":"","title":"Freedom of Conscience: A Communal-based Approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Dialogical self; Charter; Subjectivity; Freedom of religion; Freedom of thought","score_opus":0.03872762851920357,"score_gpt":0.31996113622723343,"score_spread":0.28123350770802985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000515459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062445924,0.002480382,0.043645293,0.025272358,0.00038366715,0.0000963883,0.00005351225,0.000040249655,0.86558217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98882395,0.0003390546,0.0019296875,0.0007520075,0.00020029515,0.00004823105,0.000014926743,0.000012377501,0.00787951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99274194,0.0039555137,0.00018582195,0.00059044524,0.0013903194,0.0011359876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950139,0.0021842339,0.00047913945,0.0009476409,0.0006171164,0.00075803674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063569467,0.0003417095,0.00034634853,0.0020465537,0.0065763686,0.0069558467,0.001410478,0.0024770044,0.0040296502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0080905305,0.00016875828,0.00051058707,0.0011006508,0.043622516,0.006364731,0.0069197225,0.0041361754,0.00034350494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022589218,0.000005263724,0.00014320893,0.000006588559,0.0000011884534,0.000026969637,0.0016990788,0.00008852893,0.000017959863,0.9962599,0.00028779768,0.0014613175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006603389,0.000010783012,0.0007097089,0.00006848654,0.0000029581147,0.00006349124,0.0019594235,0.00058563525,0.00005004302,0.97715515,0.019375963,0.000011763824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0085377805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007445497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0085377805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048129717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046858396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034920692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001370008","doi":"","title":"The Interpretation of Assisted Death Under Section Seven of the Canadian Charter","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Arca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Legislation; Assisted suicide","score_opus":0.008124874181169915,"score_gpt":0.2302667651020258,"score_spread":0.22214189092085587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001370008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034734037,0.0037442448,0.004034405,0.09512067,0.0021094666,0.00014047328,0.0006990459,0.00004572838,0.85937196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8184423,0.0026988431,0.0033018293,0.027543582,0.0007385414,0.0001375164,0.00029290232,0.0001025397,0.14674185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847875,0.0036282951,0.00046846035,0.0011807141,0.0047046947,0.005230458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841673,0.004893433,0.0005203168,0.0008150093,0.008636739,0.00096718123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011458671,0.0004859452,0.0006168228,0.002649214,0.029665595,0.01229148,0.0037226845,0.008016182,0.0074839843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031071717,0.00059125427,0.00062162266,0.0036467111,0.025737707,0.002958654,0.0038905535,0.011348139,0.0005586892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015492193,0.0000060045722,0.0009068926,0.000021524947,0.0000044830344,0.00017268745,0.012018025,0.00017113927,0.000040125364,0.9364684,0.045004297,0.0051708505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003430002,0.00001970338,0.011036344,0.0008759297,0.000088336856,0.0003701153,0.053001508,0.0010508951,0.00062328175,0.2268099,0.7058739,0.00021583201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9841448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99049044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10541168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10541168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1988921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76481885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001820528","doi":"","title":"Lo, How Sparrow Has Fallen: A Retrospective of the Supreme Court of Canada's Section 35 Jurisprudence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Sparrow; Pretext","score_opus":0.01978119971431492,"score_gpt":0.2570152424796264,"score_spread":0.23723404276531151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001820528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30574086,0.014500457,0.0018741573,0.27215832,0.0027283032,0.00023799314,0.0028338213,0.00014372828,0.39978233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65944016,0.00357899,0.0010270718,0.09972636,0.0003668515,0.00011038161,0.00044559414,0.00024416452,0.2350604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909504,0.00084171427,0.00015919481,0.00082301773,0.003488426,0.0037372257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987847,0.0039551402,0.00040656162,0.00028926865,0.0055989246,0.0019031786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051907594,0.00037150746,0.0006081229,0.0028715883,0.07105098,0.01644526,0.0032531114,0.013191297,0.007705587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021526625,0.0009674628,0.00051154086,0.0045658886,0.01721289,0.0040491847,0.0041718725,0.016486157,0.0005185444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011333517,0.00009526328,0.01463048,0.00015106349,0.000060495193,0.001704158,0.15717126,0.0005593496,0.0010228307,0.3993192,0.3931489,0.032023672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026396508,0.000032043936,0.03271341,0.00044417547,0.00008143602,0.0001694851,0.107628144,0.00031050897,0.0011376841,0.010023601,0.84722245,0.00021068314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99603254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15386155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15386155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26858202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98140067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7005494557","doi":"","title":"A Reply to Professor Pothier's Review of Power Without Law: The\\nSupreme Court of Canada, the Marshall Decisions and the\\nFailure of Judicial Activism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Argument (complex analysis); Treaty; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Supreme Court Decisions; Precedent; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.017168061637449824,"score_gpt":0.29279790921969845,"score_spread":0.2756298475822486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7005494557","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010504363,0.015035832,0.00009598845,0.96480846,0.01878261,0.0000035230116,0.000035449608,0.000008758741,0.0011244228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023972895,0.012556833,0.0002684476,0.9417811,0.033872005,0.000018368031,0.000033575816,0.00005788564,0.009014412],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882675,0.0026523394,0.0007931463,0.001962009,0.005114627,0.0012104169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9618504,0.022808868,0.0018342009,0.00066858757,0.010416047,0.0024218173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009669317,0.0011271756,0.0019287734,0.0027201963,0.008067087,0.011542955,0.0053037964,0.040088076,0.0073095355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044815745,0.0010922421,0.001552867,0.004645502,0.013430403,0.017170416,0.004782559,0.045498546,0.0020868687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029372934,0.0000027305625,0.00002695912,0.000053014148,0.0000029332568,0.000032674026,0.0002526914,0.000015792804,0.000013901527,0.0072248457,0.99071634,0.0016552882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014166661,0.000008395934,0.00034511174,0.00053503824,0.0000079614465,0.00015413245,0.001213279,0.0000607231,0.00006444637,0.006977812,0.9905826,0.00003640384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11175608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24847443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8882439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017931908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029551424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22221118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006522265","doi":"","title":"Unconstitutional or Just Unworkable? The Life and Death of a Prohibition on Floor-Crossing in Fletcher v the Government of Manitoba","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Repeal; Government (linguistics); Charter; Legislature; Legislative history","score_opus":0.036673547381360666,"score_gpt":0.2893710444956228,"score_spread":0.25269749711426215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006522265","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23165016,0.003527485,0.0012554787,0.44206622,0.0012307818,0.000055171226,0.000104378065,0.00003730164,0.32007298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8336693,0.0010261599,0.0004366248,0.09817506,0.0001931747,0.000030066203,0.000030480232,0.000022957713,0.066416256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546534,0.00091251585,0.00007113183,0.00032429802,0.00083252235,0.0023942196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99674606,0.000954241,0.00018278231,0.00021353467,0.0010121783,0.00089128455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044868574,0.0002757167,0.0003371477,0.00048733308,0.03150886,0.006444447,0.0024856345,0.012823689,0.0024014544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075034257,0.00044339173,0.00037685156,0.00067334995,0.024403345,0.0022123284,0.0021983176,0.014673304,0.00031165106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044676657,0.00005745006,0.009912045,0.00004261739,0.000022563,0.0033200604,0.09527783,0.0002866801,0.001029629,0.7892224,0.089198746,0.011585261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037450674,0.00007936409,0.02081894,0.0007367055,0.000084215084,0.0012157103,0.19083472,0.0006283449,0.0021622863,0.058029708,0.7251451,0.00022750939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92972547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97095823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07027453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04187165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07525047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30380154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006792801","doi":"","title":"Value Change in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Demotion","score_opus":0.04923221760151887,"score_gpt":0.27202193993545815,"score_spread":0.2227897223339393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006792801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49691117,0.0034477501,0.000979404,0.08648077,0.000557304,0.00011281684,0.00045552332,0.00004468118,0.41101053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96487814,0.00042029985,0.00024909733,0.005155346,0.000062763414,0.000022473472,0.00005210237,0.000024321644,0.02913539],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98628646,0.0016882754,0.00020168151,0.0011392919,0.0044897106,0.006194636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98232883,0.0048533357,0.00060665305,0.00048125983,0.007581837,0.0041479887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006460762,0.00031275416,0.0008777656,0.0022467417,0.047046974,0.019989705,0.0037513005,0.009138884,0.011309243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029239338,0.00057224376,0.0005142184,0.0036894842,0.013999926,0.0035199027,0.005014886,0.01102791,0.00047647365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019728889,0.00014961073,0.01834637,0.000081758335,0.00011892114,0.0010317215,0.026269943,0.0027160526,0.0005222027,0.8473355,0.077576235,0.025654433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028996065,0.00014355914,0.08921511,0.0007216773,0.00038290507,0.0002689253,0.113921665,0.007803761,0.002075035,0.28883058,0.4958056,0.0005413235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9885011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99646395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7947054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2052946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2555998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92174566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008334498","doi":"","title":"Care and Social Justice: Developing a Right to Basic Income in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Basic income; Basic needs; Argument (complex analysis); Welfare; Social justice; Workfare; Social policy; Distributive justice; Welfare state","score_opus":0.06945585885392196,"score_gpt":0.32254235906304235,"score_spread":0.2530865002091204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008334498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13291542,0.008402294,0.0034015728,0.34443903,0.0009056801,0.00018396217,0.00018814609,0.000053904398,0.50951004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9178727,0.004823948,0.0025290134,0.030989483,0.00007753825,0.00006301302,0.000062355924,0.000034331344,0.043547504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926795,0.0012284283,0.00011305497,0.00038191327,0.0015777162,0.004019491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99539596,0.00080686517,0.00018242042,0.00013275519,0.0011196878,0.002362318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003994224,0.00030320775,0.00039473514,0.00084583473,0.044543095,0.014484569,0.0022930566,0.00440561,0.005075749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006312013,0.00031973384,0.00034741336,0.0017714176,0.024800977,0.004033589,0.0084613785,0.008437572,0.00023973899],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018141538,0.000042949232,0.0033923418,0.00006643713,0.000007651567,0.0005494493,0.037498858,0.00044890743,0.0002113116,0.8990008,0.037203796,0.021559305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041345753,0.00005454174,0.016054425,0.0009684873,0.000044152363,0.0003935049,0.17970644,0.0018069635,0.0006675425,0.15189219,0.64820546,0.00016493963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99429804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99788827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17702694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17702694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42381674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9545321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008662409","doi":"","title":"Context, Choice, and Rights: PHS Community Services Society v Canada (Attorney General)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Service (business); Work (physics); Community service","score_opus":0.030774908328448165,"score_gpt":0.2672320304859552,"score_spread":0.236457122157507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008662409","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32839477,0.0060713105,0.00054575334,0.3040238,0.00048510995,0.0003526057,0.0017935678,0.000036865924,0.3582962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8836036,0.0022896156,0.0005116365,0.050318774,0.00015984739,0.00017816592,0.00024609768,0.000034992332,0.06265726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99492455,0.00063886616,0.00009064835,0.00029976855,0.001270267,0.002775922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99434763,0.0016140783,0.00021234422,0.00012911599,0.001127643,0.0025692303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003660742,0.0003857625,0.0006312705,0.001234902,0.032067966,0.009829406,0.0032691935,0.0111688385,0.013652584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010294226,0.00071677624,0.0005587882,0.0025257417,0.012260674,0.0037565876,0.004252725,0.008992671,0.0004588444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002606052,0.00044003766,0.057279136,0.00017245357,0.000080787206,0.0021540362,0.05547309,0.0011210195,0.00043618568,0.62126774,0.22478144,0.03653345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054708845,0.00013285106,0.15234508,0.0014465743,0.00033222727,0.0005992543,0.23820163,0.0025713195,0.00084697513,0.15508284,0.44748878,0.0004053272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07165629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07165629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2705351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5199052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008884250","doi":"","title":"David W. Porter, éd. - The Antwerp-London Glossaries: The latin and Latin-Old English Vocabularies from Antwerp, Museum Plantin-Moretus 16.2 - London, British Library Add. 32246.I : Texts and Indexes. Toronto, Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 2011, x-258 p. (Publications of the Dictionary of Old English, 8)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vocabulary; Medieval Latin; Latin Americans; Biography","score_opus":0.021906280966295443,"score_gpt":0.2439762052519742,"score_spread":0.22206992428567876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008884250","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00077428465,0.80477834,0.001724447,0.028309148,0.010726575,0.000041793053,0.00347572,0.00021813557,0.14995156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010126148,0.58538574,0.0050365077,0.004858593,0.0037096702,0.00007243204,0.0039835596,0.0006540777,0.38617325],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946684,0.00008102014,0.00007747891,0.000076123935,0.00025974898,0.000038821094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992073,0.00025456,0.00007880308,0.00004045618,0.0003321878,0.00008667231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074241206,0.0009970195,0.00065832905,0.003015418,0.0013002421,0.0039778487,0.00084195856,0.0009602897,0.05270864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002110242,0.00068780856,0.00028694436,0.005272381,0.0011025755,0.0060137687,0.0011917714,0.0014188781,0.05338212],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010939173,0.0000051641273,0.00014774226,0.00040747685,0.0000022188108,0.00004203805,0.0006039052,0.000021724627,0.00012586298,0.0035126498,0.891734,0.103386186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010338514,0.0000017320244,0.00051266287,0.00048112072,0.0000018355654,0.0000911982,0.00036230707,0.0000067524647,0.000046748453,0.0007013977,0.99779046,0.0000027197477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026132831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08041466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05270864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001513865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030218097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17632794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009185854","doi":"","title":"Does the Attorney General Have a Duty to Defend Her Legislature’s Statutes? A Comment on the &lt;i&gt;Reference Re Genetic Non-Discrimination Act&lt;/i&gt;","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Duty; Legislation; Legislature; Power of attorney","score_opus":0.03953545788709872,"score_gpt":0.28930123870800173,"score_spread":0.249765780820903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009185854","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004375932,0.0011152423,0.0005670864,0.9580689,0.003740831,0.000024499988,0.00011693307,0.00007478601,0.031915773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03011688,0.00044545552,0.00038124475,0.9403358,0.0021335422,0.00006387556,0.00004153819,0.00007538671,0.026406152],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856236,0.0034345826,0.0010491726,0.0021305382,0.0039734375,0.0037886924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9728943,0.018847534,0.0014664439,0.00087291165,0.0044153244,0.0015035714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016034767,0.000755461,0.0014543365,0.0010500517,0.021984283,0.010885146,0.006747121,0.07460644,0.010374744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032712672,0.0017289724,0.0021795896,0.0019588778,0.010804745,0.0066447724,0.003251573,0.049767945,0.005822852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008386479,0.00007100407,0.0019882699,0.00008172651,0.000030125404,0.00091696705,0.0089943325,0.0001890279,0.00084678427,0.18840405,0.7921909,0.0062029217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101077196,0.000078170495,0.0069411895,0.00066113076,0.00007892196,0.0002957459,0.011182472,0.0010057647,0.0016095036,0.023567893,0.95419675,0.0002814217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20815954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29318738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20815954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01510231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015645169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41389585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009949512","doi":"","title":"Fighting for Deinstitutionalization in Nova Scotia: Emerald Hall Human Rights Case","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Human rights; Appeal; Commission; Complaint; Institutionalisation; Tribunal","score_opus":0.051796697627297446,"score_gpt":0.32663712276162665,"score_spread":0.2748404251343292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009949512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40920606,0.00482427,0.00037365648,0.16594179,0.0016624528,0.00029199736,0.00024226139,0.000041110565,0.41741645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7378446,0.0018257402,0.00029091616,0.14039706,0.0002697307,0.00013616409,0.00008234076,0.000025488962,0.1191279],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99623775,0.00040695013,0.000068143454,0.0001858744,0.00039403574,0.0027071752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704486,0.00032966345,0.00016258737,0.0001028245,0.00027160443,0.0020884897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018559041,0.00042422977,0.00037481904,0.0007354551,0.033013087,0.0049096183,0.0025044766,0.008260825,0.0052038482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033844912,0.0006066021,0.00040783858,0.0006967291,0.0067002983,0.001080957,0.005985012,0.0088792285,0.000656937],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040723372,0.0006147732,0.078416176,0.00027259812,0.00012512742,0.09058065,0.068058796,0.0011276305,0.0027424085,0.30375218,0.42144758,0.032454867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045567672,0.00026499786,0.15664797,0.0019047305,0.00021279659,0.01602693,0.12077029,0.002000972,0.0022376743,0.020342426,0.6787263,0.00040920518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9113416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97468704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08865839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02992727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05858312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21713853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010018502","doi":"","title":"A frequency dictionary of Oold English prose for learners of Old English and historical linguists","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Lodz Repository (University of Łódź)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Old English; Corpus linguistics; Word (group theory); British National Corpus; Word lists by frequency; Parsing","score_opus":0.016859622056055103,"score_gpt":0.20465037870455605,"score_spread":0.18779075664850095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010018502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064372607,0.015793439,0.06253744,0.0047248695,0.0038755678,0.00063334696,0.016114308,0.0023638648,0.8875199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0380478,0.017728196,0.07991719,0.002185278,0.0016774646,0.0008762353,0.022347486,0.0031572944,0.834063],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994844,0.00009422727,0.000094985495,0.000064651664,0.00023130164,0.000030441875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873775,0.00048641587,0.00006919517,0.00018447454,0.00042230307,0.00009989148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073968293,0.00065563887,0.00057706644,0.006049881,0.0018304983,0.003698378,0.00072111085,0.0007444272,0.057938643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026694033,0.00041780795,0.00020674866,0.006422453,0.0011346218,0.0051202443,0.0015213194,0.0016562161,0.023736894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003433324,0.00003922684,0.00053635077,0.00070364075,0.0000043068394,0.00023395121,0.005157752,0.00020296601,0.0014054755,0.18988778,0.5143287,0.28746542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017928626,0.0000040896775,0.00037141077,0.00009806226,7.455453e-7,0.00020249817,0.00025106498,0.000060392114,0.000093879324,0.0031003603,0.99581087,0.000004893579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032770575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072881905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057938643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013688281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019649942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19382405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010039184","doi":"","title":"The Gildersleeve Prize for the Best Article Published in the <i>American Journal of Philology</i> in 2014 Has Been Presented to: William Josiah Edwards Davis,\\nUniversity of Toronto Faculty of Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Editorial board; Review article; Biography; Publishing","score_opus":0.05606685299926505,"score_gpt":0.30678504929770095,"score_spread":0.2507181962984359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010039184","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003557363,0.026092537,0.0011795365,0.19149323,0.41677067,0.00004713504,0.00065745827,0.00016476256,0.3600373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018252412,0.0072155837,0.00083551183,0.00572226,0.028432675,0.00002259848,0.00021932516,0.00027510957,0.93902457],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825984,0.0002689216,0.000077741715,0.00018111174,0.0008917269,0.00032074872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996191,0.00031853004,0.0001072642,0.0002034428,0.001104934,0.0020749029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003443886,0.00071584614,0.00065158174,0.0021988708,0.004177316,0.010140367,0.00073434535,0.002620405,0.101816505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062604942,0.00027940053,0.0005243594,0.001123959,0.0022051686,0.0033219098,0.0043834164,0.003028461,0.033088908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002355676,0.0000129355085,0.000113407346,0.000034698955,0.00000606518,0.000032246462,0.00010286551,0.000030710067,0.00016547127,0.01591907,0.9619702,0.021588868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034465518,0.000009759173,0.000312623,0.000058632213,0.000003030424,0.00003359924,0.00016280856,0.00003157615,0.00009906191,0.003867616,0.9954122,0.0000057369684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025575794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013988847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.101816505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034543178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004998529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34061015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010743748","doi":"","title":"Is Being a Vegan a Human Right? Advocates Claim Protection Under New Ontario Policy, but That Wasn’t the Point","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Point (geometry); Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Legislation; Human rights","score_opus":0.03994686374011938,"score_gpt":0.29754112274702266,"score_spread":0.25759425900690325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010743748","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06545639,0.001832608,0.0015528414,0.54229176,0.0013774781,0.00003272145,0.00014310445,0.000029554658,0.38728365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74149257,0.0010180569,0.00096685655,0.113164134,0.0003513291,0.000048399517,0.000043844662,0.000049730577,0.14286502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99440175,0.0010519589,0.00012611793,0.00059573463,0.0017978033,0.0020266755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99309736,0.0024693038,0.00035786137,0.0004556812,0.001917169,0.0017026516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068422486,0.00023922065,0.0003377105,0.0004920953,0.020971073,0.007356749,0.0014151495,0.012117326,0.010584836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012801108,0.00039198663,0.00040729812,0.00059162686,0.0300357,0.0062198834,0.0039095464,0.011209254,0.0007365475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045094992,0.000029818224,0.00652519,0.000076206554,0.000028879682,0.00026301682,0.05809464,0.00011027331,0.0007808718,0.83407307,0.087927744,0.012045257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031585525,0.000030075378,0.00843295,0.00046816244,0.000064316715,0.00014475152,0.06513552,0.00027456286,0.0008125631,0.100505255,0.82397866,0.00012149958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.872854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9622325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.127146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03027768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057687506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25578952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010790138","doi":"","title":"Justice Scalia's Impact on Canadian Jurisprudence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.029357123914186725,"score_gpt":0.32716048849920154,"score_spread":0.29780336458501483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010790138","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11226053,0.0044083125,0.0011074889,0.33191726,0.0036420976,0.00018399648,0.00067329954,0.00020668707,0.54560035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72198814,0.0016738389,0.0016034702,0.096200526,0.0008971274,0.00012616877,0.00015399868,0.00022462563,0.177132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9553152,0.004167878,0.000847537,0.0033645357,0.015540884,0.020764057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9535946,0.016316317,0.0009893432,0.0015625292,0.017103646,0.010433565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018890228,0.0008009265,0.0015009214,0.0061115064,0.07812937,0.022806132,0.0060505923,0.020392878,0.019390259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0695394,0.001222405,0.0019346523,0.0054895976,0.02203807,0.004274864,0.009620899,0.0245106,0.0010233037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016163888,0.000115566014,0.0052745114,0.000107340464,0.000064529726,0.0007066067,0.020498397,0.0007545804,0.0005289331,0.76744324,0.18088567,0.023459014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019451798,0.000108226246,0.044468336,0.0005038258,0.00028371435,0.0002914783,0.024505349,0.0018802955,0.001586032,0.056973223,0.8686866,0.0005183319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.994379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99669844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2643714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2643714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37157655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85322493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7011132547","doi":"","title":"Legal Representation for Complainants of Sexual Violence in the Criminal Justice System: A Proposal to Advance Women's Equality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual violence; Criminal justice; Harm; Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Representation (politics); Criminal law","score_opus":0.13925242881592523,"score_gpt":0.39761638123982734,"score_spread":0.2583639524239021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7011132547","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04615524,0.004783289,0.010924357,0.5950902,0.002576077,0.000534813,0.00006957162,0.00011334236,0.33975306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7758233,0.0049943444,0.016624851,0.07451929,0.0015943964,0.00051291473,0.000101894664,0.00007813005,0.12575093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98581064,0.0038247814,0.00039052768,0.00091359124,0.0041967183,0.004863763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884807,0.003640518,0.00075885514,0.0008302296,0.003835247,0.002454524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015871208,0.00045468265,0.0004840142,0.0036802252,0.01807127,0.019339424,0.004939951,0.011223285,0.0043121404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026657753,0.00039949673,0.0008476683,0.0024073904,0.03506726,0.008550028,0.009421686,0.007072078,0.0006731456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010342863,0.000058366426,0.0015273537,0.000074599695,0.0000041605153,0.00024037801,0.019581446,0.00016610326,0.00020393498,0.92965406,0.022299048,0.026180133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100292105,0.0001679346,0.008272142,0.0008665907,0.000072852454,0.00046619814,0.0749546,0.001882958,0.0015173863,0.20385423,0.70771354,0.00013123013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45842028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53736275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45842028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03856954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16815457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.911504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014602978","doi":"","title":"Populism and human rights - A case study of the Canadian Freedom Convoy","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"ELTE Digital Institutional Repository (EDIT) (Eötvös Loránd University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Populism; Democracy; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.018154914103019594,"score_gpt":0.25752006662461663,"score_spread":0.23936515252159704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014602978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7382649,0.0019244201,0.0006657811,0.01837491,0.00018325227,0.00016334756,0.00012410755,0.0000167794,0.2402825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95744824,0.0009021328,0.00030327807,0.0014977249,0.000025586192,0.000033782795,0.000034914727,0.0000205924,0.039733708],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99596906,0.00080290827,0.000045628098,0.00020819511,0.00071498065,0.0022592933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973658,0.0011882402,0.00015302296,0.00009960956,0.00036989187,0.0008234696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028232466,0.00065568916,0.0006567342,0.0025802746,0.065635316,0.007833729,0.002933476,0.0071335053,0.008374543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059515545,0.0004118697,0.0005303725,0.0049643833,0.022796351,0.0027779897,0.007742902,0.00631283,0.00035502715],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009214478,0.00025266482,0.015318709,0.00012996925,0.000025521467,0.020872017,0.65045375,0.00086824555,0.00046215256,0.25853464,0.020472754,0.032517463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001889428,0.00003034336,0.009277847,0.00019221686,0.000019870591,0.0012912839,0.85405296,0.00039591797,0.00022062732,0.0062505323,0.12819283,0.000056713197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97437197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99062634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07484818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07484818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09342181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5430641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014635824","doi":"","title":"Professors Trevor Farrow and Lesley Jacobs co-edit a new book, “The Justice Crisis: The Cost and Value of Accessing Law”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Value (mathematics); Democracy; Social justice","score_opus":0.05774314603860292,"score_gpt":0.3410671317554176,"score_spread":0.28332398571681466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014635824","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003826157,0.031417154,0.0010172136,0.79229456,0.1405999,0.000052180418,0.0001583058,0.0002058747,0.03387215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007510936,0.030767556,0.0022511245,0.4830192,0.07352398,0.00012457233,0.00026035972,0.00040365322,0.40213874],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964014,0.00060994027,0.00019114169,0.00034020303,0.0020869954,0.0003703058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98840415,0.005430654,0.0004416956,0.00030459272,0.0037801496,0.0016386635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003914104,0.0012389154,0.0011312308,0.0022948212,0.0049642846,0.005966581,0.002302876,0.008839986,0.016504662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015228299,0.0007186729,0.0007430996,0.0012824764,0.004498809,0.006402125,0.002313621,0.013559267,0.009140317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024436715,0.0000044729763,0.00004984484,0.000020019608,0.0000014621207,0.000018957291,0.00011256879,0.000009846353,0.000020741913,0.0025700808,0.9914014,0.0057882043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017742678,0.0000030384745,0.00012825837,0.00004573581,0.0000015183616,0.00003812466,0.00024748157,0.000021200514,0.000046366145,0.0009831524,0.9984773,0.000006079804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031981576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13064785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031981576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038599882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006506134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063590884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014967301","doi":"","title":"Same-Sex Partners And Family Class Immigration: Still Not Equal\\nWith Opposite-Sex Partners","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Government (linguistics); Refugee; Discretion; Sexual orientation; Immigration law","score_opus":0.04122675242790113,"score_gpt":0.3248462658984497,"score_spread":0.2836195134705486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014967301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6098482,0.01366251,0.00054914685,0.09025443,0.00084273925,0.000019168961,0.000055509827,0.00000817085,0.28476012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986515,0.0026833147,0.000058255187,0.0037655714,0.00011704187,0.0000069464777,0.0000084905405,0.0000031021864,0.006842313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808156,0.00065624475,0.000051549385,0.000152219,0.0003506774,0.00070779864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885845,0.0003223782,0.00018177197,0.00006111676,0.0000978855,0.00047838961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014345441,0.0001421102,0.00026629528,0.00052981696,0.007256248,0.005375084,0.0005455189,0.001967076,0.0064430484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003952864,0.00017600517,0.00019266954,0.00071654405,0.011566405,0.004477162,0.0048780395,0.002902102,0.00029773326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006365643,0.00013039199,0.046648677,0.00007107256,0.000018405333,0.0016774964,0.15625694,0.00008453947,0.00018856517,0.7316534,0.015025863,0.048180923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007245083,0.00016926386,0.10543428,0.0015249578,0.00006766879,0.0035602301,0.52811503,0.00023501115,0.00044519667,0.1144982,0.24580523,0.00007245898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041455023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08658658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041455023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024117024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040786495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08242744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015021014","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Criminal Law Theory: New Canadian Perspectives in the Philosophy of Domestic, Transnational, and International Criminal Law (September 2010)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Philosophy of law; Public law; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Theory of criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Municipal law; Criminal justice; International law","score_opus":0.06828319141865544,"score_gpt":0.3383046271057614,"score_spread":0.270021435687106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015021014","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009531586,0.1606463,0.004628865,0.5406704,0.007488021,0.00004724556,0.00027482782,0.00007697134,0.2766359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49212292,0.20166335,0.009824363,0.06641149,0.003862893,0.00015052855,0.00040334425,0.00033375362,0.22522736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967584,0.00095791597,0.0000679537,0.00028623678,0.001090081,0.00083937176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976578,0.0005346392,0.00010111423,0.00007851926,0.0010183234,0.00060969504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042316015,0.0009668345,0.00061745185,0.0048140497,0.0288655,0.016452227,0.0023321405,0.0048362673,0.008607683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031380546,0.00062240876,0.00060121645,0.0068478044,0.042552013,0.009647342,0.004259428,0.008887986,0.0006860178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012639533,0.00001778707,0.0005623879,0.000109987675,0.000006292532,0.000115703006,0.020661937,0.00016430009,0.0000641714,0.74670583,0.2112646,0.0203144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008096839,0.0000062268045,0.0017206284,0.00047872035,0.000009700819,0.000103104634,0.02595996,0.00040736012,0.00005668048,0.10215493,0.86906075,0.000033942277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9767587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99003255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20857434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20857434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15020068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9179416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015087381","doi":"","title":"The security of freedom essays on Canada's anti-terrorism bill","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Key (lock); Legislation; Action (physics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.021140125392009934,"score_gpt":0.2822883082188172,"score_spread":0.26114818282680724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015087381","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012923132,0.0072431485,0.0004729211,0.6131274,0.0067039495,0.00007399204,0.0003779928,0.00004593123,0.35903156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26769823,0.0040222667,0.00064887403,0.42369428,0.0038288299,0.00013184467,0.00018072179,0.00019271432,0.2996022],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9797553,0.0021617347,0.00032865244,0.0010377272,0.008119218,0.008597426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9711521,0.012018075,0.0005913464,0.0009682292,0.009924274,0.005345879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011963137,0.0010346713,0.0014409237,0.0038103866,0.056654874,0.029231057,0.004094701,0.042306427,0.013857073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04101895,0.0011401653,0.0013600178,0.0038326508,0.02449866,0.0059242584,0.006464592,0.038362764,0.0014648958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051311858,0.00003539554,0.00061448256,0.000041064013,0.000033020195,0.0001940897,0.0044266945,0.0002436322,0.00012336962,0.47346526,0.5158767,0.0048950515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006139842,0.0000136441,0.0027489457,0.0003218333,0.000047553833,0.00005140241,0.006182462,0.00028816808,0.00027528888,0.042505637,0.94738024,0.00012333454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9722555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9829334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1255366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1255366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1876939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9108361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015793245","doi":"","title":"Thin-Skull Plaintiffs, Socio-Cultural \"Abnormalities\" and the Dangers\\nof an Objective Test for Hypersensitivity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Tort; Supreme court; Compensation (psychology); Test (biology); Contributory negligence; Damages","score_opus":0.020533462841639323,"score_gpt":0.28229005349389474,"score_spread":0.2617565906522554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015793245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9281021,0.0009143594,0.0014565662,0.011712928,0.000105703155,0.00008325547,0.00010484866,0.000009622716,0.05751066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99714726,0.0002021135,0.0005410453,0.0014266543,0.000022821234,0.00001104267,0.000012694724,0.0000016720821,0.00063476677],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573755,0.0013147652,0.0002523167,0.0003569918,0.0018729989,0.00046537805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98569643,0.006216065,0.004096774,0.0013319037,0.0016148367,0.001043885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00784448,0.0002798807,0.0002683784,0.002533195,0.0032182017,0.0026123892,0.0009439033,0.0020155215,0.0030486681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035680354,0.00018765726,0.00037401268,0.0006939582,0.013463646,0.0027827213,0.00279632,0.002359636,0.00015827556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017858626,0.0003879146,0.696983,0.00012621752,0.000089035595,0.00520417,0.022019777,0.00048328412,0.0015227258,0.22329684,0.0033356799,0.046372816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008732683,0.00054011506,0.77267975,0.00079081155,0.0001801523,0.010336417,0.04890506,0.0018939455,0.0051335325,0.14455356,0.014769636,0.00012973236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023724137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.068487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023724137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019616531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003922911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04717207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015820676","doi":"","title":"Toward the full and proper implementation of Jordanâs Principle: An elusive goal to date","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed Central","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Payment; Service (business); Human services; Human rights; House of Commons","score_opus":0.0404460301276913,"score_gpt":0.32844372727598437,"score_spread":0.28799769714829304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015820676","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020871608,0.014622725,0.009109483,0.81948423,0.002765982,0.000091338654,0.00005727062,0.000100326404,0.13289697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50782734,0.014182703,0.03170585,0.38450727,0.002456034,0.0002874048,0.000107608575,0.00018369399,0.058742054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9808065,0.008908024,0.0012821298,0.0016835327,0.0050419187,0.0022778446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9718555,0.010516884,0.0026013532,0.0018904537,0.010360448,0.0027752859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03563212,0.00034758032,0.00071044586,0.0010667051,0.014154456,0.013997827,0.0033152513,0.012922813,0.0039105644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04346936,0.0003850978,0.00067922537,0.0010180867,0.041681234,0.0161506,0.009676927,0.0193476,0.0012833287],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008064805,0.000027683362,0.0005507789,0.00009804641,0.0000053940284,0.00020285563,0.015039175,0.000056471577,0.00012674519,0.93021065,0.038928863,0.014745289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017277707,0.000030403327,0.00095004466,0.0013111285,0.00001385303,0.00043510218,0.034361053,0.00028424402,0.0007962823,0.25635287,0.7053774,0.00007040586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034385443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05531492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96561456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00942668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07560261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18844289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015853058","doi":"","title":"Uneasy Partners: Multiculturalism and Rights in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Civil rights; Ethnic group; Legislation; Immigration; Work (physics); Citizenship","score_opus":0.031253551801445706,"score_gpt":0.2668752987429851,"score_spread":0.2356217469415394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015853058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68782747,0.0022838116,0.0007895464,0.041051626,0.00015452238,0.000067411194,0.00036376624,0.000030307048,0.2674315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762407,0.00054758234,0.00016182831,0.0010616938,0.000009287634,0.000013902825,0.000041966683,0.000016747521,0.021906221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99384177,0.0008263292,0.00011739634,0.00048158047,0.0015569443,0.003175912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892932,0.0024445585,0.0005083121,0.000337045,0.0024530734,0.0049637943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030639688,0.00031960005,0.0006688467,0.0022381276,0.05316268,0.01649051,0.0027793625,0.003234221,0.017881894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011989872,0.00042622007,0.00036248725,0.0045609823,0.016653573,0.0055245785,0.0094198175,0.006785502,0.000370818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017928054,0.00020434335,0.044906557,0.000078116056,0.00003298623,0.0010170159,0.25771484,0.0005839368,0.00041614508,0.610281,0.026321542,0.05826431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007620323,0.00005490241,0.061150722,0.00036939426,0.00006725829,0.00038596068,0.65752476,0.0013334177,0.0006537836,0.057606734,0.22055359,0.00022327168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99628156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99856746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12541334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12541334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26708466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90994173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7016114828","doi":"","title":"Walking the Line: Canada's Response to Child Custody Law Reform Discourses","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child custody; Law reform; Action (physics); Legislation; Reform Act","score_opus":0.01405200862081439,"score_gpt":0.28559518979051457,"score_spread":0.27154318116970017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7016114828","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1096507,0.0038944248,0.0007140289,0.6769601,0.0017225511,0.00006888033,0.00030720868,0.000058383368,0.2066237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72455525,0.001936736,0.0006573075,0.19093646,0.0005478278,0.00008436112,0.000102917795,0.00017833481,0.081000745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9764656,0.003974406,0.00048799996,0.0017901168,0.007082689,0.01019916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966912,0.013875518,0.001351274,0.0007430844,0.010791115,0.006327088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0119939335,0.00062166445,0.0010012729,0.004222032,0.0952484,0.032111924,0.005740623,0.029202262,0.016439632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037682123,0.0010982784,0.0009497124,0.007034088,0.034351174,0.0060855635,0.011138157,0.026037881,0.0006746655],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007923046,0.000051334096,0.0050219703,0.00011708968,0.000034120992,0.0012259613,0.2516805,0.00045363876,0.00043398346,0.4907696,0.2385674,0.011565195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006333819,0.000023803299,0.008763787,0.00043816824,0.00006329689,0.00014702126,0.23929554,0.0005120532,0.00044869902,0.022150781,0.72791785,0.00017570451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99296993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99624014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23944552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23944552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3599733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8821354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7016296748","doi":"","title":"What we have yet failed to achieve: a study of Charles Taylor's Canadian social criticism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Work (physics); Social criticism; Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.030768180002583415,"score_gpt":0.3128989957268909,"score_spread":0.2821308157243075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7016296748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4075587,0.008705509,0.0013029114,0.18766508,0.0008548627,0.0002004151,0.00015478603,0.000079659396,0.3934781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95632744,0.0020985217,0.00044946204,0.008180677,0.00011303506,0.00009268944,0.000024037032,0.0001051977,0.032608878],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96995765,0.010198893,0.00036280404,0.0014837192,0.010476105,0.0075207124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9484731,0.024248885,0.0031110337,0.001547408,0.015912687,0.006706939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019145565,0.0008439477,0.0012429398,0.0071916156,0.12586097,0.022253921,0.006397456,0.012811736,0.007061304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069183,0.0008207866,0.0006624281,0.015699537,0.06444756,0.008285131,0.009124952,0.01205329,0.000680304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002990883,0.000038081696,0.0027495099,0.000072754985,0.000009600686,0.00066037563,0.8119666,0.00009694639,0.00011687567,0.14905864,0.026336757,0.008863863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017077837,0.000028155462,0.010636813,0.0004387847,0.000022778344,0.00030207803,0.73926955,0.00027184884,0.0001231691,0.014280095,0.23450331,0.00010625265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9812617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98599523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.266063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.266063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22754711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85126287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017217481","doi":"","title":"The Alberta Legal Services Mapping Project: Pilot District Interim Report","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Administration (probate law); Key (lock); Component (thermodynamics)","score_opus":0.041817629423380444,"score_gpt":0.3039087099332046,"score_spread":0.26209108050982416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017217481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43256193,0.0014388008,0.0075524137,0.008424626,0.00047812634,0.018775202,0.30153012,0.0018840904,0.22735474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5127971,0.0017980323,0.044783667,0.001999468,0.00011560413,0.010845834,0.22957078,0.00048576374,0.19760382],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99566674,0.00076928403,0.00012372519,0.00024406293,0.002169373,0.001026912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911998,0.0006705132,0.00022106014,0.0004683518,0.0055627907,0.0018774931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058989683,0.0005142777,0.0004458013,0.003832549,0.0046604774,0.003571427,0.0028454375,0.0007722471,0.01712139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070129246,0.00066475733,0.00036599333,0.007465203,0.0008940558,0.000911471,0.0025284078,0.0008772798,0.003436838],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012830521,0.0021264644,0.26699287,0.0007417228,0.00009797158,0.0006599284,0.008116829,0.0037982834,0.003026105,0.007617362,0.43351755,0.2720219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031984932,0.0004037445,0.80070174,0.00017104487,0.000096227974,0.00012656591,0.014575966,0.0024557507,0.0016585434,0.00090980704,0.17848988,0.00009086022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97807527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.990071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97435886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025641164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1172095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18604052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017422923","doi":"","title":"Appealing to higher authority : explaining the Federal Government's appeals to the Supreme Court of Canada in charter cases","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Charter; Government (linguistics); Judicial review; Victory; Context (archaeology); Court of record; Legislation","score_opus":0.03757363454004791,"score_gpt":0.2832660218393896,"score_spread":0.24569238729934167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017422923","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68723917,0.0013290776,0.0028201786,0.027307782,0.0001289339,0.00015972006,0.00021232625,0.0000581541,0.2807447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947161,0.0002685377,0.00035877814,0.0007623003,0.000019307518,0.000014809348,0.000035274737,0.00001669601,0.0038081969],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98873514,0.0025833952,0.00027577614,0.0008198179,0.0039162417,0.0036696026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98275536,0.010520464,0.0012420524,0.00032653112,0.0035025247,0.0016530907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062629357,0.00038157718,0.00048434144,0.0043712803,0.028737381,0.017875407,0.002856423,0.00543968,0.0056313085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028048987,0.0004988867,0.0005596803,0.0047304276,0.02683661,0.0044278842,0.0062915417,0.006529446,0.00035838626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043282234,0.000087975095,0.015387114,0.00006619937,0.0000142390445,0.0019157724,0.5559538,0.0009363212,0.0004562341,0.41125557,0.0059603504,0.007923213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045272915,0.00003081885,0.06520675,0.000606272,0.00006334518,0.00042214352,0.72374225,0.0064571397,0.0005050826,0.08046004,0.12226338,0.00019752797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98012596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9777796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16298388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16298388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09184657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97082007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017710310","doi":"","title":"Book Reviews: Religon, Sex and Politics: Christian Churches and Same-sex Marriage in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Pretext; Hyporeflexia; Gestational period; TSG101; Demotion; Diafiltration","score_opus":0.02016534349079384,"score_gpt":0.22843972823758166,"score_spread":0.20827438474678783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017710310","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011585355,0.92106986,0.00009188325,0.020928292,0.007954647,0.00002798403,0.00075839146,0.000024172658,0.04798618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016650915,0.8774991,0.00024721117,0.00701435,0.0052214507,0.00004208957,0.00079619524,0.000057683996,0.09247111],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909437,0.00008448811,0.00003951846,0.00008124236,0.0005569923,0.00014333053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965333,0.00085521676,0.00017823992,0.00006455576,0.0019051391,0.00046364864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006703943,0.0011016909,0.0013020514,0.004936795,0.00623634,0.0047709816,0.0016771788,0.0026095717,0.036420967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028240695,0.0004685558,0.00045694856,0.018884916,0.0029603182,0.0019086729,0.00094470644,0.0019233815,0.0033599555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024268895,0.000023068336,0.00097088027,0.0018922231,0.000019501664,0.00010002708,0.0013730424,0.00028682366,0.00006491268,0.01211975,0.91606903,0.06705653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073967844,0.000011024845,0.007843905,0.0027259758,0.000020208312,0.00010467915,0.0018318692,0.000067785855,0.000023178714,0.0009801218,0.98635477,0.00002905355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.963213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9879632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045208562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045208562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.079790905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3280126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018063867","doi":"","title":"CharterWithout Borders? The Supreme Court of Canada, Transnational\\nCrime and Constitutional Rights and Freedoms","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Comity; Deportation; Jurisprudence; Human rights; Deference; Habeas corpus","score_opus":0.014070708020285604,"score_gpt":0.2618538402923396,"score_spread":0.247783132272054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018063867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08565599,0.020005824,0.002317981,0.17691228,0.0010185669,0.00007331003,0.00034134104,0.000061908926,0.7136128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92227453,0.0036284502,0.000807473,0.019432837,0.00022740988,0.00005261279,0.000082682236,0.000035186255,0.053458914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930159,0.0012961479,0.00013667425,0.0008056674,0.0019828083,0.0027627354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99533266,0.0017820728,0.00029810594,0.0003711977,0.001479029,0.0007369715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051145395,0.00031151055,0.0005425236,0.0011872257,0.029591016,0.018872617,0.0022826348,0.0072862934,0.0035818457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009837414,0.0003882735,0.00040770133,0.0025893939,0.038311467,0.0045304117,0.0043732063,0.009629318,0.00024446298],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041926155,0.000005525904,0.0003480484,0.000009465285,0.0000025047286,0.00008513041,0.0030079056,0.00012096251,0.000042117896,0.98333216,0.010029799,0.0030122416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046292444,0.000022992099,0.009709918,0.0007253549,0.000054223954,0.00012864053,0.019578066,0.0012506979,0.0004678308,0.4507285,0.517128,0.00015946488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96443826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97042537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9149954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08500464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12782724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6167548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018098546","doi":"","title":"Commentary on Macdonald: The Principles of Fundamental Justice—Prospects for Canadian Constitutionalism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UF Law Scholarship Repository (University of Florida)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Constitution; Perspective (graphical); Feature (linguistics)","score_opus":0.043236995087699,"score_gpt":0.2675835810653192,"score_spread":0.2243465859776202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018098546","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008303701,0.004172798,0.00020162201,0.9708174,0.0073194173,0.000019257035,0.00012263458,0.000012303539,0.01650419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032158967,0.0035761697,0.00077492633,0.9136941,0.006951511,0.00007145648,0.00006593705,0.00010141834,0.042605508],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817616,0.0027176917,0.00087654113,0.0026978403,0.007997025,0.0039492473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94351715,0.032054767,0.0009957583,0.0010451288,0.017931208,0.004455975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01970592,0.00096232677,0.002626129,0.0033571848,0.036867153,0.016253877,0.010230244,0.054033637,0.016294971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07552446,0.0014726782,0.0018079086,0.0054363534,0.029566573,0.010206375,0.0055421637,0.06424125,0.0018573161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040762705,0.0000082081015,0.00010808031,0.00008159638,0.000013834373,0.0001306174,0.0035523393,0.00009302332,0.00006683046,0.15137088,0.84106135,0.0034725468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010236776,0.000008108006,0.0012460983,0.00070356135,0.00006583899,0.00008192334,0.0070071947,0.000257434,0.00019689719,0.067500554,0.9226575,0.00017262019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9534096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9725395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10000685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10000685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1787685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7256039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019257546","doi":"","title":"Former dean, former chief justice of Ontario Superior Court share Justice Medal","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medal; Economic Justice; Administration (probate law); Administration of justice","score_opus":0.024435753883450224,"score_gpt":0.28884595588764994,"score_spread":0.26441020200419973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019257546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010660373,0.0043048966,0.00074711314,0.19275388,0.011705454,0.000363445,0.006851027,0.00047906983,0.7721348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008736292,0.00065474154,0.00019660612,0.0041555325,0.00025550512,0.000015455436,0.00035637387,0.000036361194,0.985593],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99635255,0.00012079641,0.00010880301,0.00042190086,0.0019114701,0.0010845303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872077,0.00028888386,0.00021572137,0.00019095112,0.0070937746,0.0050030006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019406889,0.0004876937,0.0005039959,0.0020709806,0.024785845,0.006037922,0.0011457278,0.0032693413,0.17846549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059666093,0.00059734675,0.00043532648,0.0019944943,0.002445316,0.0016492931,0.0016164075,0.0034684564,0.03091433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021227816,0.000014483956,0.0016838964,0.000026542944,0.000002788246,0.000094539086,0.00049844355,0.000028860164,0.00018511635,0.0051786844,0.9817947,0.010470758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006246964,0.0000068286226,0.005206827,0.000029975077,0.0000041743288,0.000053923402,0.0008322183,0.00006829068,0.00013769942,0.00035555454,0.9932847,0.000013693743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.946132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99145186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17846549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07597928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13792212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5970265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019565105","doi":"","title":"Human Rights Denied: Single Mothers on Social Assistance in British Columbia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Single mothers; Government (linguistics); Tribute; Social assistance; Work (physics); Public assistance; Social policy","score_opus":0.024943226699875202,"score_gpt":0.2874923809535168,"score_spread":0.2625491542536416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019565105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85882586,0.0021517286,0.00008805599,0.06557844,0.00043696348,0.000070659364,0.00035208592,0.000018599321,0.072477676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9299445,0.0018025327,0.00007001589,0.01762221,0.000045684126,0.00005852782,0.00008862724,0.000014646934,0.050353214],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704736,0.00023751962,0.000049705453,0.00013797106,0.00042787954,0.0020995864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99610126,0.00074182916,0.0003057849,0.00008590646,0.0008760842,0.0018891133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012852326,0.00024637938,0.000542558,0.0008040046,0.02962683,0.0037671188,0.0017288943,0.0042198235,0.013479075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034343207,0.00042641046,0.00015677518,0.0016421449,0.003871972,0.0012997735,0.0041024764,0.0065262667,0.00053261267],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049971,0.00062785234,0.1724786,0.00038051224,0.000079392834,0.033762842,0.30496728,0.0004903735,0.003942067,0.075549126,0.29557896,0.11164322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012650395,0.00014452275,0.22014724,0.0010315415,0.00008876107,0.0019811848,0.59931,0.0006766443,0.00088967994,0.0040199766,0.17137614,0.00020783201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98026854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9943006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03462657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03462657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.080059014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25123453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020350247","doi":"","title":"Lessons from India's constitutional culture: what Canada can learn","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Ideology; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Economic Justice; Social rights","score_opus":0.024113032850586042,"score_gpt":0.2801419250843484,"score_spread":0.25602889223376235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020350247","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09626152,0.043557703,0.0007524995,0.65195745,0.0034261409,0.000048203798,0.0010040773,0.00006634828,0.20292601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83741057,0.06454793,0.0014743892,0.06266894,0.00083910243,0.000046930494,0.0005602222,0.00010978763,0.03234207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952553,0.0007976751,0.0000973343,0.0003573379,0.0013543222,0.0021380498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98797506,0.0027903598,0.0003735937,0.00051875075,0.0044472273,0.0038950248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004432993,0.00046377914,0.00084398425,0.0019684273,0.021867443,0.014853277,0.0019078754,0.002144703,0.011162694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009396943,0.00029244655,0.00046825106,0.006650188,0.014347958,0.0077273403,0.0051797964,0.0079098875,0.00068466546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013584508,0.0001665524,0.017424965,0.0010592715,0.00006417865,0.001037093,0.14901502,0.00041375484,0.00044071136,0.4318225,0.21700583,0.1814143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025584055,0.00003818992,0.025578422,0.0019939614,0.000072476025,0.00020769492,0.30266577,0.00027471135,0.00038880415,0.04074006,0.6278682,0.0001460419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97953504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98843145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09712501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09712501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20613284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70469457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020401896","doi":"","title":"&lt;em&gt;R v. Turtle&lt;/em&gt;: Substantive Equality Touches Down in Treaty 5 Territory","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Suspect; Treaty; Criminal justice; Criminal court; Indigenous","score_opus":0.030240597552403412,"score_gpt":0.294709229128924,"score_spread":0.26446863157652056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020401896","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07720046,0.0016405847,0.00064089097,0.042663697,0.0006220132,0.00008511512,0.0003757286,0.00015044221,0.87662107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6081469,0.0003939542,0.00046445534,0.038503144,0.00015386548,0.000050390223,0.00016230368,0.000050784463,0.35207433],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983096,0.00014205574,0.000033858716,0.00014590651,0.00043908108,0.0009293866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993895,0.00014516007,0.00003883764,0.00003849676,0.0001816646,0.00020624655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011088797,0.00017680886,0.00013918703,0.00040117343,0.0067112464,0.0027496063,0.00094297976,0.0036749335,0.018699901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002017867,0.0002143555,0.0002505324,0.0003222266,0.0020240336,0.00087596336,0.0013739517,0.003495831,0.0018816672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009739616,0.00006410158,0.010508414,0.000087962326,0.000013818245,0.0026539497,0.0058371224,0.00043882104,0.0017943338,0.36794075,0.5710303,0.03953295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004635475,0.00010272792,0.0463596,0.00021101371,0.00004425826,0.0006213553,0.0046942,0.00091999886,0.0020977312,0.00805271,0.9367635,0.00008649289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57750535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8355457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42249465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0091684135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011390717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8499656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020432691","doi":"","title":"Lest Law Forget: Locke's Toleration and Religious Freedom","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Religious freedom; Conscience; Freedom of religion; Supreme court; Charter; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice","score_opus":0.014977088311792619,"score_gpt":0.26940261232594154,"score_spread":0.2544255240141489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020432691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050887074,0.006178966,0.003675807,0.31817606,0.00075652066,0.00006169865,0.00013473822,0.00006217769,0.62006694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.835444,0.0016050055,0.000802376,0.081234075,0.00024127611,0.000043358046,0.000032902746,0.000036720794,0.080560215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962759,0.0006618484,0.00006141483,0.0002992365,0.0010602695,0.0016414754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768555,0.000993276,0.00017047326,0.00013275458,0.0005736822,0.00044427137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026143729,0.00020780739,0.00030298467,0.0010826704,0.021717723,0.009461309,0.0014007117,0.0073522753,0.0050256737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007595781,0.00023081504,0.00032461065,0.0010731494,0.036100097,0.00636655,0.0039299326,0.009660276,0.00034804258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000586468,0.00000796631,0.0006094861,0.000009880253,0.000001683894,0.00012678931,0.0078069516,0.000035294754,0.000060274648,0.96675146,0.021104736,0.0034796656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003938765,0.000039510298,0.005452796,0.00033344715,0.00002034235,0.00041209877,0.04527166,0.00047935135,0.0005231519,0.4204209,0.5269013,0.00010605882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8286604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8967583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8286604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02561423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033080336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34469724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020579064","doi":"","title":"Medicare and the Law: Contours of an Evolving Relationship","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health law; Health care; Insurance law; Health insurance; Public health; Health services; Public health law","score_opus":0.04106299220771441,"score_gpt":0.2951297527952151,"score_spread":0.25406676058750066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020579064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030870661,0.018176574,0.0070752786,0.30547372,0.0007530866,0.000041549174,0.00006466397,0.00003490672,0.6375095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9391963,0.008042967,0.0029634144,0.029722007,0.001661374,0.000079346995,0.000032116644,0.000061912186,0.01824053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99048537,0.004221226,0.00019289098,0.00086555385,0.0031067184,0.001128257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98808634,0.0082458975,0.0006071027,0.0003947632,0.0014935792,0.0011723953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009995166,0.000240829,0.00052752544,0.0024605258,0.01324668,0.020383526,0.0017947466,0.008076747,0.0057788193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02006802,0.00047353937,0.00028502048,0.0033731402,0.067673214,0.017446244,0.0069256984,0.0121257715,0.00033931035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016058759,0.0000027016001,0.00006051707,0.0000029095604,4.3049977e-7,0.000011541737,0.0018291001,0.00001804477,0.000013338691,0.9960962,0.00077664014,0.0011869891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012661775,0.000013828424,0.0010477399,0.00019896691,0.0000042713054,0.0000670142,0.0121678775,0.00026893817,0.000053357857,0.83911616,0.14702527,0.000023969786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09580095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.081038795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09580095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025006017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020016683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19048661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020653648","doi":"","title":"A Life of Oneâs Own: Freedom and Obligation in the Novels of Henry James","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Personhood; Kantian ethics; Obligation; Private law; Liability; Reasonable person; Negative liberty","score_opus":0.007948571281931396,"score_gpt":0.196593512309966,"score_spread":0.18864494102803459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020653648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21318321,0.028129784,0.0050948868,0.14175709,0.0050742663,0.00009824346,0.00015771923,0.0001447672,0.60636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.902561,0.0034812985,0.00086701673,0.00678431,0.0011778872,0.000038780065,0.00002090773,0.00007747109,0.08499124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967133,0.0017950616,0.00006566601,0.0003101173,0.0006097118,0.00050614757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972288,0.0017889865,0.00025118544,0.00013907105,0.00015389214,0.0004379449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003617713,0.0003403221,0.00041422847,0.0008397575,0.014302167,0.008384991,0.00072488375,0.0022058212,0.0031262182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004768519,0.00034255345,0.0002416476,0.0005041576,0.028862325,0.0057452293,0.0037176602,0.0048298617,0.00040134022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005541675,0.000041364,0.0002847102,0.00008925596,0.0000054665475,0.00044112236,0.17292519,0.000106740365,0.00034020882,0.792645,0.023925727,0.009139754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015937483,0.000043739834,0.0006711727,0.00016948715,0.000006031444,0.00043709498,0.061285853,0.00010113217,0.0003273804,0.10226308,0.83462673,0.000052333096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009348093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015027963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014302167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077859345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003424217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056491137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7021243920","doi":"","title":"In a Nutshell: An Attempted Assault on Access to MAiD","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Nova scotia; Legislature; Supreme court; Legislative intent; High Court","score_opus":0.056502298400217574,"score_gpt":0.3470001580969478,"score_spread":0.2904978596967302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7021243920","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15394498,0.003179051,0.004168087,0.593761,0.0047968347,0.0001717588,0.0005002752,0.00006849963,0.23940942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5085892,0.0020746063,0.0028634942,0.41706315,0.0012749541,0.00011202387,0.000099204495,0.000040052324,0.06788336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546576,0.000942963,0.00022877843,0.0005970911,0.0012100243,0.0015552801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99596715,0.0016551584,0.00024290709,0.00022767253,0.0010803528,0.00082679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035038218,0.00040207797,0.00040425503,0.0009075172,0.021272812,0.0069734706,0.0021752373,0.01608473,0.002370917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010611936,0.0005804736,0.00077830954,0.00068666664,0.011132459,0.0027356565,0.004398601,0.021846462,0.0005257517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010915433,0.00008634325,0.014315055,0.00013161392,0.000077473065,0.0073650386,0.050055087,0.00041361366,0.002658516,0.69372547,0.21072091,0.020341787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008564463,0.00016676991,0.018781103,0.0011491934,0.00016403272,0.0039944854,0.058555625,0.0013459581,0.002683843,0.05395127,0.858802,0.0003200091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6495856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80601406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6495856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017219448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020928906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70495605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7023555315","doi":"","title":"Patient v. God: Determining the Standard of Care for Christian Science Practitioners in Medical Negligence Cases","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Standard of care; Faith; Lawsuit; Liability; Prayer; Subject (documents); Bad faith; Faith healing; Medical malpractice","score_opus":0.02487832448403333,"score_gpt":0.3400245148270556,"score_spread":0.31514619034302227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7023555315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5763854,0.0034123557,0.017669916,0.20202044,0.00084111263,0.0008933813,0.00019908279,0.00010838766,0.19847001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97187525,0.00042820943,0.005048953,0.020657951,0.00012060982,0.00013327837,0.000026068285,0.000015842774,0.00169395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.935959,0.027548859,0.006271535,0.0027566333,0.020215135,0.007248819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8879271,0.084092796,0.009720609,0.0027955172,0.010940035,0.0045238603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.067552455,0.0002910477,0.0007339414,0.0031360537,0.011484252,0.009320415,0.0035405313,0.017962692,0.0022301334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18429834,0.000773832,0.00091806496,0.0015497914,0.015346942,0.0076566776,0.007612711,0.00986344,0.0003181982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002726554,0.0002946199,0.06841446,0.00022934195,0.00008562922,0.004889794,0.04373073,0.0013929701,0.0010398837,0.81842905,0.025196202,0.036024623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055667595,0.0013168191,0.1301117,0.0054353145,0.0005832484,0.010616817,0.13411976,0.015541334,0.009526719,0.53090066,0.16043456,0.00085641997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04598546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08350423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067552455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013821345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04245266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35725582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024439063","doi":"","title":"(Review) Life Sciences Law in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Diafiltration; Liquation; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Durvalumab","score_opus":0.025158368113985287,"score_gpt":0.23566401521886218,"score_spread":0.2105056471048769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024439063","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00061916944,0.92635936,0.00017824785,0.041217376,0.0027459108,0.000063872496,0.0009478221,0.000041782878,0.027826494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01596507,0.9480862,0.0005526027,0.022055332,0.0009873057,0.00010977117,0.00056975585,0.000021522537,0.0116524575],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954254,0.0005621056,0.00044194626,0.00027918798,0.002642631,0.0006487438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798924,0.0053425045,0.0016094324,0.00036891483,0.01035466,0.0024320136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004390679,0.0008250747,0.001709771,0.008251068,0.0053255255,0.009215085,0.0024991634,0.004398956,0.017723577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02412544,0.00056827767,0.00111002,0.018752895,0.0043168417,0.0021315445,0.0022807275,0.0038236678,0.001717715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007514844,0.000038285114,0.0016555677,0.016884012,0.00028013796,0.00015986338,0.00043700487,0.0002769181,0.00008260457,0.015344191,0.7058184,0.25894794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081067614,0.000021455557,0.008288987,0.030340625,0.0005011973,0.000117406686,0.0005198991,0.000071312366,0.00006446524,0.0018977408,0.9580548,0.00004109643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9580292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9839115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068691775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.068691775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36656645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49839604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7025122317","doi":"","title":"Tribunals, Trials, and Tribulations: The Impact of Administrative Law on Religious Freedom in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Judicial review; Supreme court; Charter; Deference; Judicial independence; Politics; Legitimacy; Political question; Common law","score_opus":0.029211021612811028,"score_gpt":0.2916726830988903,"score_spread":0.26246166148607925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7025122317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55640644,0.0045489436,0.0012453097,0.048548844,0.00033026905,0.0002114832,0.000535225,0.000053368516,0.38812017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821899,0.0010265791,0.00028023135,0.0023085235,0.00004843753,0.000019926403,0.000064813605,0.000018106015,0.014043461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98543257,0.0017423882,0.00023745127,0.00086208334,0.0051699905,0.0065556183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98132885,0.0063739005,0.0011994588,0.00043934947,0.0061398586,0.004518595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005790746,0.00026532312,0.00073344423,0.0032228671,0.03824283,0.017431121,0.003666437,0.003833514,0.007903911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028546678,0.00053943053,0.00067292206,0.004851359,0.018459888,0.0030690518,0.0061423145,0.0071572494,0.00036545252],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015617807,0.00017027665,0.053615857,0.00013858888,0.00011007157,0.001401796,0.0489898,0.0031549241,0.0007351578,0.8100651,0.046681408,0.034780987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024505978,0.00015043038,0.34280354,0.0008761027,0.00047261294,0.0003977163,0.15797304,0.01022496,0.0013921118,0.11885549,0.36608526,0.0005237089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99632925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99869543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23251824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23251824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2781028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89017004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7025264160","doi":"","title":"Violating the Fundamental Rights to Life, Liberty and Security of the Person","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Government (linguistics); Variety (cybernetics); Fundamental rights; Human rights; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.2773285404863174,"score_gpt":0.5304249775543842,"score_spread":0.25309643706806684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7025264160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0192875,0.0042207553,0.007868417,0.09238602,0.001691131,0.000259283,0.000497901,0.00018670218,0.87360233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39702892,0.0036159698,0.008648103,0.104873516,0.0005988566,0.00036433554,0.000508172,0.00014231954,0.4842198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98766637,0.0017620584,0.00035891985,0.0012881295,0.004346658,0.0045779366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957768,0.0011498065,0.00027473227,0.0006665882,0.0012901862,0.00084190984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073034554,0.0004947096,0.0007173496,0.0006062305,0.013131655,0.009091324,0.0020067522,0.008397442,0.008805638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009732114,0.00049339567,0.00069485523,0.0005581843,0.024508558,0.003248652,0.0071542314,0.008575908,0.0030930089],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032560078,0.000038407794,0.0012356585,0.000057475707,0.000011638853,0.00021724873,0.006523975,0.00017161171,0.00055842334,0.88004166,0.07986,0.03125129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024963638,0.00004081236,0.0024437434,0.00035803838,0.0000132519945,0.00024700924,0.0026152974,0.00017691212,0.00057381747,0.04494611,0.94850075,0.000059189348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5600381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6338122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5600381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017086383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06739524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88510585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7026925493","doi":"","title":"Canadian Constitutional Law, 5th ed.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.026941133876617233,"score_gpt":0.30875384019289465,"score_spread":0.2818127063162774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7026925493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017065005,0.10200047,0.0022255478,0.032517023,0.0033895527,0.00010070663,0.0076011596,0.00043708624,0.850022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052644644,0.07041903,0.004125183,0.012031241,0.0010519641,0.00017286284,0.0034208293,0.00031938485,0.85581493],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971349,0.00018087194,0.000078216304,0.00023566293,0.0018485641,0.0005218587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781823,0.00032183737,0.00007191415,0.00012813679,0.0013991996,0.0002605978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014373412,0.0011303562,0.0007005703,0.0056426525,0.012335274,0.008260996,0.0025903485,0.004134249,0.07338212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056731855,0.0009857547,0.0007238018,0.007386225,0.0054411353,0.0036826583,0.0014617898,0.0035938842,0.010787115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008235343,0.000012381663,0.0003288859,0.00010094238,0.0000044422018,0.00006295421,0.0006435504,0.00019135962,0.00008394155,0.16061097,0.8093951,0.028557252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032283697,0.0000016773016,0.0008784913,0.00016960975,0.0000038865064,0.000026920288,0.00034162254,0.000057885394,0.000044486475,0.008012918,0.99044853,0.000010776893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96330345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99026966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08717739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08717739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11302026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6325192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027169388","doi":"","title":"Canada Needs a &lt;i&gt;Criminal Code&lt;/i&gt;","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Law reform; Public law; Theory of criminal justice; Repeal; Presumption; Human rights","score_opus":0.026594949739680688,"score_gpt":0.2829563817100952,"score_spread":0.2563614319704145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027169388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011112597,0.007678237,0.0010008316,0.26842204,0.002288075,0.00020379254,0.0014871992,0.00033140305,0.70747584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08874325,0.004659922,0.0019505377,0.031806976,0.00030521466,0.00008128977,0.00059585075,0.00015974461,0.8716972],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959526,0.00019772492,0.000051885112,0.0002008804,0.0021994822,0.0013974222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953223,0.00037330185,0.00013388286,0.00017938587,0.0021758243,0.0018153037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014686652,0.00038831943,0.00036555534,0.0008291577,0.016697358,0.0076794205,0.0013581287,0.004217446,0.041573543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038015565,0.00035434714,0.0003609061,0.0015492773,0.0060448856,0.0016184194,0.0021346158,0.004160499,0.005091418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001934462,0.00003565738,0.0014596393,0.00008893622,0.0000035889657,0.00022141363,0.0020947894,0.00016783521,0.00029099666,0.09178696,0.8584097,0.0454211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054442007,0.0000079146885,0.0023246452,0.00006679913,0.0000036698239,0.000032247375,0.0018621323,0.00013343089,0.000109387445,0.0023193716,0.9931161,0.000018891835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99290764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99681854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07520053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07520053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27272394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54562056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027263651","doi":"","title":"Christ Church Montreal : as parish church and cathedral, a report to the select vestry of the church to the rector of the parish, with appendices, containing opinions of Canadian counsel and evidence of the chief cathedral authorities in England, relative to ecclesiastical law and usage in England and Canada.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Durvalumab","score_opus":0.01116459226790117,"score_gpt":0.22222124589084447,"score_spread":0.2110566536229433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027263651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036012627,0.08590534,0.0009028706,0.16186292,0.00591082,0.00026329287,0.01641523,0.00033216688,0.6923947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21948043,0.016622659,0.0010451456,0.007779508,0.0007916523,0.00010284294,0.002468911,0.00020862918,0.7515001],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992366,0.0000910242,0.000015436608,0.000084979285,0.00033207718,0.00023985571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999012,0.00011303662,0.00006507125,0.000035145382,0.00044637962,0.00032837654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049980654,0.00044486753,0.00015240867,0.0014255729,0.013552004,0.0053033866,0.0013587065,0.001947744,0.04166559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028644716,0.0004027748,0.000191719,0.0031336886,0.0028767062,0.0016634815,0.0010337387,0.0020086505,0.0018523335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030010138,0.000014849723,0.0032587042,0.00010184368,0.000007993623,0.00020087545,0.004324643,0.000098507626,0.0002395968,0.03957133,0.93198836,0.020163292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004915819,0.000005052278,0.021099918,0.00008869854,0.0000056347835,0.000037712947,0.005043683,0.00003024921,0.00020421697,0.00063648925,0.97282434,0.000019109131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9885105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99746704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045461297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045461297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06548955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32984632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027420131","doi":"","title":"CLE Working Paper No. 3/2022--What is the Test for Interlocutory Injunctions Affecting Homeless Encampments? A critique of Vancouver Fraser Port Authority v Brett and associated case law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interlocutory; Test (biology); Prima facie; High Court; Economic Justice; Common law","score_opus":0.019301202386498136,"score_gpt":0.2911467522075722,"score_spread":0.27184554982107406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027420131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009137682,0.009579588,0.001952226,0.246579,0.0037101735,0.0003766791,0.0044064946,0.0002895396,0.72396857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18222196,0.005433039,0.0057496787,0.2575744,0.0042466614,0.0007946695,0.0034809501,0.00082865,0.53967005],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97225565,0.007242916,0.0014402088,0.0032661469,0.011502452,0.004292622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9400431,0.034794264,0.0016306461,0.00462695,0.014657191,0.004247807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034294255,0.0007612417,0.0018047893,0.004573026,0.009576263,0.024901193,0.0059289946,0.027470578,0.043038096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06525007,0.001250338,0.0010635661,0.0048745573,0.0114773465,0.007354663,0.0036457807,0.015664648,0.01669573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010429953,0.00014949996,0.0024359333,0.00022057239,0.000019390796,0.00028296313,0.001096958,0.00030194884,0.00045185437,0.36263558,0.6056947,0.026606211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008287743,0.000051889143,0.008168472,0.0011763261,0.000027075012,0.00018148229,0.001662897,0.00067765714,0.00089857215,0.040097572,0.94685215,0.00012311566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3002049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3793059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6997951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02540627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028829213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.596915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027562072","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Cases 2024 (Pt 3B) | Punishment and Policing","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Constitutional law; Supreme court; Constitutional right; Constitutional review","score_opus":0.029665197691563956,"score_gpt":0.316151327943935,"score_spread":0.2864861302523711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027562072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009410495,0.0022525913,0.0011096746,0.039178316,0.0021456631,0.00019810018,0.00094795274,0.00008079351,0.94467646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2558769,0.0017557594,0.0021702538,0.05357946,0.0016798049,0.00035985012,0.00096091913,0.00009490169,0.68352205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99506795,0.00087991304,0.0002106667,0.00048473352,0.001817638,0.0015390922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792,0.00069609145,0.00012218073,0.0002157516,0.0005112091,0.0005348063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004177857,0.00035370994,0.00026277843,0.0010827297,0.010930485,0.007102825,0.0018291492,0.008256489,0.032679696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009593337,0.00044590628,0.0006417796,0.0010171221,0.0060710134,0.0021106175,0.004728248,0.0063661155,0.0044247406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016568158,0.000047821824,0.00076768076,0.00004167265,0.00000476241,0.000503899,0.00090547977,0.00013736488,0.00040534878,0.7324005,0.2514686,0.013300383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029688252,0.000028325972,0.003313618,0.00016607584,0.0000072852918,0.00020118627,0.0014005668,0.00020749326,0.00061306055,0.043209888,0.9507947,0.000028080674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13576998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23255514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13576998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0084001385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012995219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2699594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028599313","doi":"","title":"The Forgotten Foundations of the Canadian Constitution","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Focus (optics); Variety (cybernetics); Element (criminal law); Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.026431668761052265,"score_gpt":0.28893950985284317,"score_spread":0.2625078410917909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028599313","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024097767,0.008300381,0.005059707,0.052303832,0.00091361447,0.00006620578,0.00067080074,0.0001268462,0.9084608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7969431,0.009122935,0.005688254,0.008875031,0.0002721928,0.00008966527,0.0004388214,0.00017368927,0.1783964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938246,0.00064151717,0.000085680374,0.00043708927,0.0032711243,0.0017400319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968437,0.0006912036,0.000115673145,0.00025427487,0.0017504102,0.00034479948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00259781,0.00041877193,0.0003124156,0.002954475,0.025679713,0.011758616,0.0015358684,0.0021905527,0.008966613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0080429055,0.0005225938,0.00033608577,0.003902096,0.026392281,0.0032880048,0.0035530208,0.0049602115,0.0007950145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004507353,0.000001942821,0.0002850296,0.000017335242,0.0000017128012,0.00007382942,0.00454555,0.00015162124,0.00006340224,0.9638204,0.023369428,0.007665112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073870624,0.0000045025095,0.0035277316,0.00029222388,0.0000130384,0.00009262329,0.008381435,0.0005170679,0.00024600554,0.1439286,0.84292996,0.000059508537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98370886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1371639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1371639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2014063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028704038","doi":"","title":"Freedom of Religion and Canadaâs Commitments to Multiculturalism: A Critical Analysis of the Rights-based Approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Individualism; Legislation; Politics; Context (archaeology); Freedom of religion; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.006820129876828344,"score_gpt":0.21843094818094488,"score_spread":0.21161081830411654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028704038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0679638,0.0091012735,0.010178818,0.124876074,0.00047247752,0.00014552296,0.00011555206,0.00002406171,0.78712255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709406,0.0022204814,0.0020069936,0.0049487273,0.00012165726,0.00006382794,0.000030902756,0.000027065555,0.019639758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990294,0.0032506874,0.00013869948,0.0005843865,0.0032958016,0.0024363934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897955,0.005316168,0.000479803,0.00039103077,0.0031982737,0.00081916177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00944217,0.00045385468,0.0004506533,0.003260349,0.030976936,0.01644813,0.0025175272,0.003852623,0.0031431601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011075178,0.00034310942,0.0005653511,0.0032765812,0.07589621,0.0073968815,0.0056473073,0.007135556,0.000181909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022379108,0.000003200564,0.00012284722,0.0000117867385,0.0000010211448,0.000051699182,0.011057527,0.000069087204,0.000021067153,0.98628205,0.0012998346,0.0010775339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021434584,0.000012095063,0.00244517,0.00054866547,0.000019640765,0.00015101099,0.083812825,0.0011179717,0.00039505117,0.5938226,0.31759387,0.000059611648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89382046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8802797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13322207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13322207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.105423644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96659833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029115264","doi":"","title":"The Impact of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms on Canadian Family Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Family law; Legislation; Human rights; Derogation","score_opus":0.014783856505965821,"score_gpt":0.2715451670347743,"score_spread":0.2567613105288085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029115264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22583188,0.004848401,0.0013100212,0.20193763,0.0012230547,0.000114976305,0.00073540874,0.000059544855,0.56393903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9332849,0.0018085717,0.0007498628,0.013070176,0.00016991392,0.00004966437,0.000094738985,0.00005849588,0.05071368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820338,0.0031052402,0.00026990645,0.0012161472,0.005892474,0.007482469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9689553,0.012136695,0.0009766357,0.00091177947,0.010948118,0.0060715633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013244036,0.00043575247,0.0006580847,0.0037834942,0.04717854,0.015980164,0.0034404101,0.007155661,0.016174491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04816199,0.0007364601,0.0008895513,0.004671016,0.027714869,0.0055911285,0.0053725042,0.009313581,0.0003669576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007544151,0.000059512393,0.005021445,0.000039704566,0.000013977452,0.00020521645,0.016683558,0.00060697837,0.00014553622,0.920857,0.039277174,0.017014422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016394758,0.00014049537,0.12645642,0.00084827543,0.00018359158,0.00021940537,0.08475448,0.0032320037,0.00096793444,0.14016624,0.6422957,0.000571484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9977423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2755106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2755106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38249257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.840305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029917498","doi":"","title":"&lt;i&gt;Ohenhen (Re)&lt;/i&gt;","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Legislation; Action (physics); Work (physics); Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.025631411265506297,"score_gpt":0.29112484286538054,"score_spread":0.26549343159987426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029917498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062049134,0.001381881,0.0005353057,0.03950706,0.0015960296,0.0002687586,0.0023188721,0.00029495687,0.9478922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027977524,0.00028565936,0.00053212343,0.020083625,0.000207087,0.000118025,0.00035071283,0.00013281555,0.9503124],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975853,0.00013288652,0.000089118505,0.00034197723,0.00087230885,0.0009784846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984085,0.0003563173,0.000055131135,0.00013461948,0.0008331904,0.00021230303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017873563,0.00058451534,0.00038367292,0.00085776125,0.012116339,0.006060951,0.0019401034,0.011942387,0.09794438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041447673,0.0007799303,0.00066941493,0.0008665931,0.0028226974,0.0019866563,0.0015841307,0.006849575,0.01887963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052877258,0.000030215511,0.000974038,0.00008149596,0.000009743594,0.00042236832,0.0014105048,0.00008773108,0.0010010828,0.12371105,0.8613126,0.010906306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015097362,0.000007859608,0.0028731998,0.0000720439,0.000013193369,0.000048585083,0.0008333732,0.00014369306,0.0006084107,0.002710373,0.99263614,0.000037925674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87053764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9476884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87053764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023782568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017995182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32765657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030550705","doi":"","title":"NIL/TU,O Child and Family Services Society v. B.C. Government and Service Employees’ Union’ and Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada v. Native Child and Family Services of Toronto","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Presumption; Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Treaty; Statute; Context (archaeology); Child protection","score_opus":0.010486245182409521,"score_gpt":0.23468210040047321,"score_spread":0.2241958552180637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030550705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08248276,0.0046230326,0.00062360254,0.06335844,0.0009397659,0.00020469888,0.0019732867,0.00016220093,0.8456322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47076532,0.0023885018,0.0005057859,0.061535392,0.00016748626,0.00018620724,0.00074420945,0.00006442758,0.4636426],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976743,0.00011420557,0.00004672982,0.00012792577,0.00070576376,0.0013310735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875414,0.00032257734,0.00005778724,0.000029999017,0.0005041136,0.0003314253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008406875,0.0003599152,0.00020216047,0.0006755537,0.017315414,0.003195741,0.0010572039,0.0052435207,0.011195511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025489416,0.0006582867,0.00041849117,0.00064561266,0.0018430435,0.00082463375,0.0010852902,0.0050655683,0.0011886396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011515199,0.0000610287,0.019680975,0.00019980599,0.00003547271,0.0023795953,0.014705606,0.00029177897,0.0018770709,0.17831731,0.7646704,0.017665802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069051865,0.000070730515,0.07100417,0.0003205464,0.0001260196,0.00035834534,0.012235896,0.00071779196,0.0020699296,0.005370968,0.90752435,0.00013218762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99203366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03369999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028410224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039190877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20613158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030630737","doi":"","title":"The New Wall of Separation: Permitting Diversity, Restricting Competition","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legitimacy; Legislature; Constitutional law; Obligation; Order (exchange); Politics; Common law; Redress; Judicial review","score_opus":0.05090135956236783,"score_gpt":0.38038426112766155,"score_spread":0.3294829015652937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030630737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10154405,0.009223494,0.042962722,0.13205609,0.0022566915,0.000072172195,0.00006156976,0.00011790785,0.7117054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93894994,0.0016604171,0.0054554,0.015947044,0.00075188366,0.000119369004,0.000031271902,0.00009976727,0.036984976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901232,0.004540131,0.00024302927,0.0011357929,0.0022972221,0.0016605986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99535626,0.0017639945,0.00043270286,0.000813526,0.00044951474,0.001183998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006806484,0.00037279437,0.0006222311,0.0011923022,0.010416151,0.01651097,0.0017401362,0.005229328,0.0070589646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012585909,0.0003975169,0.0006416393,0.0009957151,0.052187845,0.016792614,0.01670096,0.010013982,0.00089766097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017608298,0.000008337313,0.00017952397,0.000012897896,0.0000024998014,0.000038934388,0.002140891,0.00008939972,0.00011564462,0.98903275,0.0027793925,0.005582103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039929888,0.000057668065,0.0006457212,0.00020442434,0.000012524922,0.00016969223,0.00658814,0.0005552015,0.0003392018,0.84185815,0.14949732,0.000031985946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072361436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011567964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01651097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006248213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008444784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0453341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7033402659","doi":"","title":"Pt 1 Remembering Peter - His Brilliant Legacy: A Conference in Honour of Peter W. Hogg","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Economic Justice; Constitutional law; Session (web analytics); Common law","score_opus":0.033745194698947586,"score_gpt":0.3012863335053523,"score_spread":0.2675411388064047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7033402659","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028562336,0.024721213,0.00070708035,0.4794982,0.05757562,0.00010163975,0.00043831745,0.00017385052,0.43392783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014137956,0.0057939775,0.00039762323,0.023957442,0.0033109335,0.00003119614,0.00007785693,0.000104804625,0.95218813],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991503,0.00014874265,0.000012604635,0.00012956254,0.00032541872,0.00023337186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880743,0.00013153687,0.00003279546,0.000041699823,0.00036412964,0.000622461],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093418924,0.0004318659,0.00031045655,0.00043155355,0.00837791,0.0050752405,0.0005446476,0.0031681515,0.074111626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024405618,0.000408182,0.00027034074,0.0006941321,0.0014662677,0.0024444829,0.002225204,0.005580761,0.022312816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005454339,0.0000041535836,0.00005488341,0.000011694327,5.061891e-7,0.000050014685,0.00016143521,0.000009912521,0.00006993735,0.0019096938,0.991527,0.0061953445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.738652e-7,0.0000021101414,0.00017161728,0.000019561823,5.6373113e-7,0.000041865464,0.0005183708,0.000006349183,0.000029683379,0.00016402845,0.99904174,0.000003160679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11528948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29025462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11528948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005898401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007958256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24792808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7033730692","doi":"","title":"SCC’s ‘Barnburner’ Fall Session Features TWU, Groia, Comeau and Other Hot Cases","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Supreme court; Occupational safety and health","score_opus":0.038645441933677055,"score_gpt":0.32817872819922833,"score_spread":0.2895332862655513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7033730692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045798182,0.0007621495,0.00092386204,0.05560743,0.004686171,0.0005025878,0.0007817398,0.00043702772,0.89050084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2011718,0.0003553071,0.0013500061,0.072449274,0.0016710985,0.0003924858,0.00094666594,0.00029479092,0.7213686],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963618,0.00018708096,0.00006416708,0.00024205828,0.0017576005,0.0013873056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970987,0.0006274026,0.00008948816,0.00018652696,0.0009295123,0.0010684143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017910388,0.00048911455,0.0005699633,0.0016843171,0.027738808,0.005373751,0.0016698589,0.009045792,0.04006621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046135252,0.00049914763,0.00086123985,0.0013492942,0.0031112907,0.0013728674,0.0035559207,0.008362292,0.008499472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043041535,0.000147694,0.0026098546,0.00003873707,0.000011029015,0.001654769,0.003874875,0.000050229366,0.00092123065,0.024428492,0.951368,0.014852122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020125382,0.00006370158,0.017305203,0.00009748891,0.000018123843,0.0005579915,0.0060154335,0.00015980963,0.00096478785,0.0038725955,0.9708812,0.000043599575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31433064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7696749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31433064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010348331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012888396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.625002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7036745041","doi":"","title":"Courts Liberalism And Rights: Gay Law And Politics In The United States and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Diafiltration; Liquation; Emperipolesis; Hemopericardium; Durvalumab","score_opus":0.02308376715207233,"score_gpt":0.2489310658295246,"score_spread":0.22584729867745226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7036745041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50535995,0.019701427,0.00061231205,0.22376876,0.00052767736,0.00010403117,0.00081672636,0.000043646665,0.24906553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94960445,0.006155587,0.00033936786,0.011082535,0.00006570926,0.0000287579,0.00013662726,0.000029598876,0.032557517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950629,0.000552287,0.0000906217,0.00023698786,0.0015823354,0.0024749849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99119776,0.0021781542,0.000368633,0.000127498,0.0024641831,0.0036636926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028650423,0.00022743552,0.00051578635,0.0032979993,0.03335756,0.013029103,0.002035125,0.0041854186,0.008521095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009155757,0.00045140638,0.0004525949,0.0058919424,0.013584297,0.00286179,0.004438952,0.006405171,0.00027581688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014737583,0.00026383848,0.07704872,0.00015148854,0.000091210364,0.0013283914,0.10058894,0.001441257,0.00046081046,0.6752077,0.08555114,0.0577191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012860815,0.000049422495,0.24387279,0.0008087552,0.00013137932,0.00028080132,0.2569045,0.0022514905,0.00061570766,0.0528346,0.4417333,0.00038867354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99870265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.191028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.191028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28814366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93829286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7037272184","doi":"","title":"Dignity and Equality: Lawâs Reasonable Claimant and Human Dignity under Section 15","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; TSG101; Hyporeflexia; Gestational period; Pretext; Diafiltration; Dysgeusia; Circumstantial evidence; Demotion","score_opus":0.016058537729752752,"score_gpt":0.22024220167814076,"score_spread":0.20418366394838802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7037272184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.091427274,0.008137416,0.014476931,0.08671447,0.00049704214,0.000109030894,0.00007614182,0.000025152909,0.7985366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97316575,0.001216711,0.0023947167,0.0060145897,0.000114587776,0.00006500479,0.000027319053,0.000009718388,0.016991613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99120307,0.0035926732,0.00037430835,0.0007483501,0.0023423722,0.00173913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99417204,0.00272624,0.0008245508,0.00046721668,0.0009869239,0.0008230832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00782689,0.00029843178,0.00041613512,0.0012296513,0.007429431,0.010854401,0.001379421,0.006295893,0.0040767808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016510274,0.00027120218,0.00043180666,0.00085809035,0.06804568,0.009248498,0.007823773,0.0053716125,0.00035652256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046695873,0.000010680956,0.0004371193,0.0000100096295,0.0000014547177,0.00007759915,0.0040308754,0.00003401828,0.00003573483,0.99174494,0.00083685614,0.002776105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013641321,0.000032482676,0.002613708,0.0002528457,0.0000096339545,0.00027502474,0.008225904,0.00023557562,0.00025626985,0.93911475,0.048945144,0.000024982453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.071269244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08847803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071269244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015500359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024007661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14170885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7038064224","doi":"","title":"Fighting for Abortion Access in Canada: A Constitutional Analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Charter; Order (exchange); Politics; Constitutional law; Human rights; Multitude","score_opus":0.0319142895112389,"score_gpt":0.3268187012552184,"score_spread":0.2949044117439795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7038064224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16410454,0.0055997944,0.0043808827,0.042574216,0.00019173982,0.0002939095,0.0014580252,0.000086959226,0.7813099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9572804,0.0031196703,0.00290593,0.005034499,0.000088133376,0.00010759255,0.00020888513,0.000025296793,0.031229654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936393,0.0005747093,0.0001416057,0.0003792552,0.0024958036,0.0027694413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99450064,0.0020698595,0.00024256977,0.00024668337,0.0021450934,0.00079516985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030940098,0.00028748598,0.00035433398,0.0032582919,0.018676344,0.009491266,0.0021385043,0.0028690158,0.007695207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0084924195,0.000383016,0.0006818388,0.0035324066,0.009841925,0.0016100868,0.002616933,0.003318563,0.00024163148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010926368,0.000014169213,0.0033386769,0.00003301826,0.000013086996,0.00022187852,0.0020996532,0.0010305324,0.0002167195,0.98044807,0.0061393026,0.006433983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001513152,0.00009367254,0.06904564,0.000878454,0.0004683895,0.00056290935,0.024076726,0.014984013,0.0019334912,0.3034245,0.58395606,0.00042492148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99519676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14011587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14011587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17416775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7038446903","doi":"","title":"Human Rights in Canada: A History","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.029587077567275456,"score_gpt":0.23770504923837624,"score_spread":0.20811797167110077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7038446903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067619205,0.30899128,0.0010450783,0.23217176,0.0029244442,0.00013083738,0.0013468232,0.00008164136,0.38568887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6781901,0.17777018,0.001301741,0.027370391,0.0010038777,0.00009610633,0.00041072426,0.00013214847,0.113724664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99606055,0.00042418178,0.000117635536,0.00032233508,0.0013627522,0.0017124312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99329376,0.0013285533,0.00031481482,0.0001220718,0.0028981103,0.0020426672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002722835,0.0006395735,0.0008958533,0.0077626444,0.030071393,0.016513681,0.0022893376,0.0058626113,0.012979828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007432551,0.00070257374,0.0005147257,0.016557446,0.020580936,0.004877276,0.004223171,0.007314613,0.0004533354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085155836,0.00012758462,0.005271961,0.0005716354,0.000046708603,0.00064274366,0.027117504,0.0005741187,0.00015838568,0.73803717,0.1078022,0.11956491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024284029,0.000023923596,0.02314268,0.0014318988,0.000042229854,0.0002285911,0.027864957,0.0003675765,0.00016723445,0.026824953,0.9197674,0.00011424656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99845564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28125954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.28125954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3993898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83363706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7039144081","doi":"","title":"Language's Empire: A Counter-Telling of Administrative Law in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Rhetorical question; Administrative law; Pragmatism; Statutory law; Statutory interpretation; Face (sociological concept)","score_opus":0.03444596635754573,"score_gpt":0.32403547870750166,"score_spread":0.28958951234995595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7039144081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42826977,0.002183726,0.00311063,0.07484471,0.0003993806,0.00008434927,0.00045538024,0.00010035722,0.49055165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788422,0.00037105754,0.00038141492,0.0020431553,0.000026058464,0.0000100081825,0.000039804883,0.00003338502,0.01825293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926515,0.0010587588,0.0001818491,0.0007717219,0.0030936587,0.0022423815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98765683,0.005279887,0.00064549554,0.00062178966,0.004907406,0.0008886638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040631467,0.00028784445,0.00065907766,0.002493501,0.03386957,0.015121713,0.0027041116,0.003145302,0.00798787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023534304,0.0004726397,0.00039732104,0.0043841344,0.01998957,0.0039679063,0.0059020226,0.007687691,0.00028638245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009632485,0.000027151646,0.0076939645,0.00008424277,0.000026999041,0.0007034063,0.09985644,0.0008323952,0.00040378186,0.8541532,0.017879708,0.018242419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010723429,0.00005854967,0.028235663,0.00046578993,0.00018077635,0.00031844885,0.20409648,0.008878209,0.0024416842,0.14352979,0.61142594,0.00026138665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99439174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99576026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17431754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17431754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20352645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9576746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7039266045","doi":"","title":"Merging Public Law Silos and Canada's Evolving Constitutional Law Landscape","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Charter; Constitutional law; Public law; Common law; Public interest","score_opus":0.025534808378368565,"score_gpt":0.2791676540431795,"score_spread":0.2536328456648109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7039266045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21668355,0.018910492,0.0061131367,0.22961356,0.00068105874,0.0001353953,0.0013970381,0.0002958899,0.52616984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96657693,0.0041066897,0.0017447282,0.009658898,0.00014669557,0.000031396918,0.00020055438,0.00008945087,0.017444737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98758,0.0011464088,0.00019648408,0.001185315,0.004874612,0.005017277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886602,0.002074534,0.0006729399,0.00049035007,0.0039716996,0.0041302918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005851683,0.00029691635,0.000558456,0.009066392,0.029597284,0.02861955,0.0027984697,0.0028753553,0.00937285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009665701,0.0005167242,0.0005260938,0.011104657,0.03787046,0.0047770534,0.006957171,0.006768786,0.0002946182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031758245,0.000026360667,0.005081244,0.00008761109,0.000028346107,0.00031063196,0.014328597,0.0010207089,0.00035885788,0.9229147,0.022617318,0.033193853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044343626,0.00004211198,0.05328461,0.0006514993,0.000070721835,0.00018704882,0.052677784,0.0024534988,0.00044524547,0.16360122,0.7263397,0.0002022856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9898908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99604356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67309594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.32690403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.329905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7806959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042199048","doi":"","title":"Know Your Rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Disadvantaged; Viewpoints; Economic Justice; Human rights; Fundamental rights","score_opus":0.036206679758248074,"score_gpt":0.2881077017293042,"score_spread":0.2519010219710561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042199048","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008272774,0.0044843038,0.001087405,0.12171207,0.011202541,0.000098185614,0.001718643,0.00040382642,0.8584657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019039284,0.0073511004,0.0010989885,0.068205155,0.0043001682,0.00013785061,0.0020291533,0.0003744503,0.89746386],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938903,0.0010876184,0.00024012022,0.0007506581,0.002755654,0.0012756453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98749244,0.0019362936,0.0006630569,0.0018965222,0.004779488,0.003232212],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037474243,0.0007593771,0.00091360416,0.0014665283,0.006334643,0.012443358,0.002029087,0.007993147,0.46198738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030708704,0.00034302665,0.0007441793,0.0015476444,0.0040048137,0.011851808,0.0050955424,0.006012674,0.28822553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014006003,0.000022078286,0.00041896847,0.00008192962,0.0000050083695,0.0001255996,0.00048923324,0.000021208258,0.00007154368,0.017355034,0.90715003,0.07424546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003019855,0.000004543142,0.00019711065,0.0001236436,0.000002121506,0.00009435923,0.00036931172,0.000010878018,0.00003070878,0.0035167069,0.9956405,0.000006970454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021885272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032055482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46198738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036002777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011858573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7674097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042475084","doi":"","title":"Pintea v Johns: 18 Months Later","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Disadvantage; Supreme court; Order (exchange); Confidentiality; Common law","score_opus":0.04053946778917482,"score_gpt":0.2826299591933842,"score_spread":0.24209049140420935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042475084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04274229,0.008681299,0.0016547123,0.21303755,0.023620037,0.0003510762,0.005341592,0.00025605623,0.7043153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14748748,0.0033616624,0.000829407,0.1598226,0.00401229,0.00021304935,0.0016820049,0.00015087219,0.68244076],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952029,0.0003185019,0.00022561013,0.0009256395,0.0018726093,0.0014547938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729115,0.0009672577,0.00010374181,0.00017381487,0.0010510798,0.0004128617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031052155,0.00037750672,0.0002982378,0.0017868783,0.009138352,0.0077567953,0.0013253259,0.008750872,0.016853081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010612913,0.00047707924,0.00077356846,0.0018522551,0.0029086566,0.0038019791,0.002659845,0.010110024,0.003109715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007943985,0.000069634334,0.003489923,0.00007241349,0.00002008713,0.0025479393,0.0054894616,0.00006857803,0.00033064384,0.14600779,0.8093464,0.03247777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013230576,0.000021274109,0.00503654,0.0001312543,0.000020226118,0.00042354563,0.0016524884,0.000043462634,0.00035688316,0.0041381232,0.9881336,0.000029288385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34402484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49497077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34402484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009656909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015734097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6840448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042683996","doi":"","title":"Poverty: Rights, Social Citizenship, and Legal Activism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Retrenchment; Punitive damages; Social activism; Poverty; State (computer science); Social justice; Social policy; Accountability; Social rights; Entitlement (fair division)","score_opus":0.02281804932006808,"score_gpt":0.29592120986234755,"score_spread":0.27310316054227946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042683996","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053636614,0.02810613,0.00082447537,0.24544302,0.00082995347,0.00003215112,0.000029553541,0.000022233633,0.67107576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9154563,0.011578676,0.00037212105,0.013331436,0.000946835,0.00008133054,0.000020355801,0.00002118292,0.058191873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611205,0.0018872414,0.00005260938,0.00016687207,0.0006748755,0.0011063919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784625,0.0012237198,0.00020816742,0.0000727886,0.00019378998,0.00045529034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030556093,0.0002927562,0.00027845328,0.0013642769,0.013871186,0.008678684,0.0007678637,0.003635106,0.003746205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040691285,0.00015209292,0.00014516825,0.0012500945,0.03694829,0.006416978,0.006562042,0.0031481155,0.0002620179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069501934,0.00004326181,0.00069343013,0.00005137977,0.000002339702,0.00012286802,0.049662877,0.00008828498,0.00004915126,0.8978816,0.03570658,0.015691277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010931207,0.000027437238,0.00386755,0.00059021765,0.00000517191,0.00013406658,0.09750245,0.00015008761,0.000114357164,0.31055188,0.58703345,0.0000124153585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035503946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056265023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035503946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0083354665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010546154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07059461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042703787","doi":"","title":"From Prohibition to Permission: The Winding Road of Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Permission; Narrative; Law reform; Confidentiality; Government (linguistics); Medical ethics","score_opus":0.024831176818262298,"score_gpt":0.29653189806369756,"score_spread":0.27170072124543526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042703787","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18860759,0.009896491,0.004047555,0.5970842,0.0016788131,0.00013666687,0.0002179877,0.00008149218,0.19824922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.927674,0.0032223803,0.0011712696,0.046554245,0.00010265171,0.000032072883,0.000040462033,0.00006891218,0.021134024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98333365,0.004141296,0.00037526514,0.0011014362,0.0041850256,0.00686335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854476,0.00473899,0.000648198,0.00031361805,0.003516666,0.005334805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007924929,0.00033432004,0.00055858056,0.0011146389,0.06484453,0.016230075,0.0035485143,0.007975984,0.0052771275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020640446,0.00059162657,0.0005946488,0.0027749187,0.04414552,0.005160597,0.012319281,0.025353024,0.00031312948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055851026,0.000043778313,0.0055084047,0.00018571007,0.000023813001,0.0022820404,0.3438303,0.0007414662,0.000431036,0.55279475,0.06512588,0.028976995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029329743,0.000031641175,0.006852131,0.0006586457,0.000033633994,0.00052625715,0.38702586,0.00067203294,0.00048001244,0.027997764,0.5754931,0.00019958436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9943434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99708873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22240607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22240607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3973868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90189874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042724862","doi":"","title":"Procedural Due Process in Canadian Constitutional Law: Natural Justice and Fundamental Justice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UF Law Scholarship Repository (University of Florida)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural justice; Economic Justice; Process (computing); Natural (archaeology); Procedural justice; Due process","score_opus":0.020014598031905216,"score_gpt":0.2633029171998547,"score_spread":0.2432883191679495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042724862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05239159,0.01823424,0.019723484,0.2332925,0.0021259463,0.00021213316,0.00070148206,0.00013884822,0.6731798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9087072,0.0053369924,0.0067571667,0.011403024,0.0005465356,0.00011588197,0.00014207853,0.0001070204,0.066884145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850874,0.0039059,0.00047088703,0.0016680008,0.0046558995,0.004211927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792067,0.010754521,0.00061205425,0.0010228177,0.0065407343,0.0018631733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016699323,0.0007153538,0.00110756,0.004081831,0.027846264,0.019521479,0.0045395824,0.010762289,0.012184109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048225336,0.0010239088,0.00087024225,0.0068787136,0.04135605,0.009079913,0.0041167387,0.012540662,0.0004660848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034780933,0.0000063887483,0.00015703615,0.000015766947,0.0000023432729,0.000016479684,0.0020055026,0.00017430425,0.000015127323,0.98732066,0.007336317,0.002946701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036602032,0.000011095444,0.0047844476,0.00037678075,0.000044585235,0.00005534522,0.006329043,0.0023225376,0.00017885004,0.8089229,0.17678556,0.00015221394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9875558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15961169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15961169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33569315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9747313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042795276","doi":"","title":"Purposivism, textualism, and originalism in recent cases on charter interpretation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CentAUR (University of Reading)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; TSG101; Hyporeflexia; Subpoena; Demotion; Articular cartilage damage; Diafiltration; Pretext","score_opus":0.026450804224473618,"score_gpt":0.2721568596693859,"score_spread":0.24570605544491228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042795276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36576554,0.012000181,0.0059300414,0.120728545,0.0014247878,0.00021616217,0.00019869988,0.000081442435,0.49365464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734909,0.0020969007,0.00067510136,0.009213423,0.00026937912,0.00005003613,0.000044741613,0.000045558674,0.014114039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9710579,0.010606534,0.00089734833,0.0020095739,0.01062453,0.0048041097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9600463,0.028308678,0.0029394687,0.0014572596,0.0063977474,0.00085056346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02810951,0.00053754967,0.000602506,0.0037035493,0.039204694,0.014229635,0.0031911372,0.0066803223,0.0018039356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04815777,0.00054216845,0.000667056,0.0061849924,0.06343841,0.004440392,0.0055719223,0.012455148,0.00013450964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003345557,0.000021358253,0.0030796346,0.00013212969,0.000016544107,0.0013767482,0.17012675,0.00030380368,0.0003287336,0.8001304,0.01275432,0.011696139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079810976,0.00008602877,0.029974641,0.0018363983,0.00020072534,0.0013361177,0.29647252,0.0022734718,0.0039139003,0.1333941,0.5300348,0.00039751217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8658327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9371267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8658327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.104565114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053270523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7586765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042850041","doi":"","title":"A Proposed Transjudicial Approach to s. 15(2)\\nCharter Adjudication","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Reservation; Supreme court; Charter; Adjudication; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Disadvantaged","score_opus":0.024391582733606504,"score_gpt":0.2878392128043245,"score_spread":0.26344763007071803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042850041","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019727185,0.0014258124,0.12379809,0.10674421,0.0040587876,0.0016943256,0.00063749,0.00055366295,0.7413604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5427485,0.00089986215,0.1069292,0.07619601,0.0016481307,0.0019238185,0.00037280022,0.00016535638,0.26911637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9693684,0.008505709,0.0015026869,0.0044161896,0.010312182,0.005894815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835766,0.0045883944,0.0005745317,0.0019116168,0.008076907,0.0012720301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03141052,0.0006530878,0.0005331415,0.0029477794,0.017221088,0.016944801,0.0069927904,0.016332857,0.004781209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022023559,0.00076206366,0.0012983667,0.0024540387,0.018983081,0.004499247,0.0042886334,0.014327412,0.0013445453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048974657,0.0000122861065,0.00024979885,0.000009910982,0.000003377365,0.00006136472,0.0012316622,0.00018047984,0.0001306176,0.9815965,0.012572769,0.0039463434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009269695,0.00007895673,0.0022181384,0.00036919964,0.00007339418,0.0003232308,0.0045313826,0.009608864,0.0013884965,0.49986145,0.4812464,0.00020782379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47391328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5924961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47391328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030788738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.093381405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9423096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042910812","doi":"","title":"Restraining Equality: Human Rights Commissions in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Legislature; Commission","score_opus":0.06841918944618636,"score_gpt":0.3049123135558104,"score_spread":0.23649312410962403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042910812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42171228,0.007375357,0.0011430604,0.2935697,0.0011736939,0.0002514903,0.0004563648,0.000077572586,0.27424046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92279416,0.0014252367,0.0005462988,0.020791704,0.00009299357,0.000063476255,0.00007269819,0.000045066427,0.054168314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760559,0.0032206783,0.0003527205,0.0010791033,0.003911505,0.0153801935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96570987,0.009506181,0.0012734616,0.0007367363,0.006863082,0.015910674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010381649,0.00039322287,0.00089971477,0.002112422,0.06669442,0.022423824,0.005091459,0.013348785,0.017215012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033786453,0.00089308777,0.00058756507,0.004828482,0.016759438,0.005908542,0.011107789,0.015312464,0.00054966175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027251858,0.00031840312,0.024905123,0.00019344172,0.000066624896,0.001410854,0.08807094,0.0016446867,0.0004790355,0.68345714,0.1402753,0.058905892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002478157,0.00011210632,0.059570473,0.0008043446,0.00014522724,0.00026385378,0.31462228,0.0023864694,0.00090884534,0.05909986,0.5614436,0.00039513654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99588937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22810823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22810823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5401592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89528507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043236540","doi":"","title":"Review of <i>Canada's Indigenous Constitution</i>. By John Borrows.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Statement (logic); Indigenous rights; Government (linguistics); Traditional knowledge","score_opus":0.021693640946036614,"score_gpt":0.2301069395190524,"score_spread":0.20841329857301577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043236540","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003318395,0.943617,0.0000912929,0.026925383,0.0067269416,0.000011635894,0.0005129091,0.000020669213,0.02176235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015143645,0.9121203,0.00034037686,0.016437309,0.004132309,0.000024618917,0.0008451858,0.00005451455,0.05090188],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863607,0.00009058279,0.00005793678,0.000112986,0.00088656973,0.00021588418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99623233,0.0003535751,0.00016410874,0.00008123461,0.0027750828,0.00039361801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001274736,0.00086360914,0.0007315368,0.007605808,0.004763448,0.0037234824,0.0016068103,0.0017456898,0.011254627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038344122,0.00042257534,0.00031221937,0.013391672,0.00433374,0.0020669627,0.0011769785,0.0023632024,0.0020617398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013040481,0.00000950948,0.00033897223,0.0020642267,0.000015309522,0.00008590383,0.0008095111,0.00012061411,0.00010269984,0.015793135,0.89899135,0.081655614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010560286,0.0000021828544,0.0017728037,0.0011914625,0.000005785117,0.000040400977,0.0003290218,0.000012524283,0.000027086295,0.00035034708,0.9962598,0.0000075450853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94411796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97311723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055882037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04389702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08777268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31849664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7045331193","doi":"","title":"Administering the Canadian Rule of Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.03726989943488113,"score_gpt":0.30882176601139427,"score_spread":0.27155186657651315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7045331193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.121802025,0.0017891602,0.0062043155,0.05612317,0.002067483,0.0024222252,0.002969402,0.0007160986,0.8059062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6118226,0.0016215333,0.01717961,0.022214867,0.00028303202,0.00095508836,0.001414395,0.0002631761,0.34424564],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9675291,0.0033519312,0.0011826255,0.0034888524,0.014834433,0.009612885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9536883,0.009493117,0.0007628988,0.0027107939,0.029046554,0.004298462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019018374,0.00067869097,0.00093915575,0.00393545,0.029049223,0.010455723,0.0040098913,0.0076587605,0.016028712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067750946,0.0011076396,0.000858703,0.0034363742,0.005261254,0.0032494536,0.0039223856,0.008371408,0.0029767996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021406206,0.000418894,0.038491324,0.00020296466,0.000072435534,0.00085901894,0.022350794,0.0017418475,0.0015924454,0.30759984,0.46550578,0.16095047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013188754,0.00021451419,0.07274442,0.00043576446,0.00013936705,0.00028262727,0.019834181,0.0031031729,0.003985351,0.019126557,0.87964547,0.0003567041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9923012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99624544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13130414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13130414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41984144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95268273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067248648","doi":"","title":"Lifeworlds of Administrative Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Lifeworld; State (computer science); Administration (probate law); Indigenous rights","score_opus":0.0700096953384404,"score_gpt":0.36582666681565956,"score_spread":0.2958169714772192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067248648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068512864,0.008580335,0.009398175,0.07722862,0.00044838962,0.00005978454,0.00018019449,0.00011007434,0.8354815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97175795,0.0021163009,0.0017914803,0.0028953643,0.000103698105,0.00004597588,0.0000908411,0.00006678895,0.0211316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98361087,0.008657541,0.0002774109,0.0013244471,0.0027385976,0.003391173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99253136,0.002276061,0.0004886679,0.0010627608,0.0016411357,0.002000119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009095604,0.00049369887,0.0003918249,0.0031353827,0.038444046,0.026979426,0.002023521,0.0035065562,0.0058208373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009506596,0.0004732727,0.00045367348,0.0033779559,0.14795418,0.01164309,0.0097871795,0.006999857,0.00069520035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035440223,0.000004861969,0.00024681076,0.0000069290923,0.0000015998218,0.000051667146,0.037336487,0.00007634794,0.000031860938,0.9571478,0.002595152,0.002496902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008051145,0.000011217292,0.0015848554,0.00012477681,0.000006847544,0.00013732402,0.103806004,0.0003497537,0.00014170315,0.40117845,0.4926125,0.00003856844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4753459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4378147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4753459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06412791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04062527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9451582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067547708","doi":"","title":"&lt;i&gt;Bissonnette&lt;/i&gt;: Another Step Forward, After the Harper Decade of Regression in Sentencing","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Pessimism; Charter; Supreme court; Relation (database); Economic Justice; Sentence; Life imprisonment","score_opus":0.01715910415535603,"score_gpt":0.2730890884724468,"score_spread":0.25592998431709074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067547708","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012235037,0.009884479,0.0012991187,0.58446723,0.0046274113,0.00008541464,0.00046861425,0.00018449458,0.38674816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17519566,0.003568812,0.0014157292,0.37950942,0.00082312996,0.000104646824,0.00016400794,0.00017724017,0.4390414],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996743,0.00046282238,0.00007513542,0.00036358676,0.0011739389,0.0011814989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979595,0.0005942978,0.00010601775,0.00007851051,0.00083561934,0.00042604635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027068148,0.00037141022,0.00023803256,0.0005797805,0.017541528,0.00725014,0.0017702602,0.013515362,0.010065421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006151616,0.0003978033,0.0003456858,0.00083538954,0.00673666,0.0027733964,0.001474595,0.012757037,0.0021495137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019249455,0.000018638859,0.0019548712,0.0000637645,0.000003815547,0.00029658183,0.0067687365,0.00009700086,0.0005111347,0.17233329,0.7978725,0.020060373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015974716,0.000022288956,0.007486549,0.0002574115,0.0000142092085,0.00008151422,0.0062555415,0.00020140917,0.0007602364,0.0066731307,0.97816896,0.00006279449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9156055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.967226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9797716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02022841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027392542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.169783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067615404","doi":"","title":"Mike Peerless on Carriage","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carriage; Power (physics); Isolation (microbiology)","score_opus":0.03773232448395241,"score_gpt":0.3004084426198087,"score_spread":0.2626761181358563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067615404","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012968769,0.012987447,0.0012621474,0.5746387,0.021230184,0.000028763883,0.000092921284,0.00023998576,0.38822296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01935775,0.0037108292,0.0005508435,0.12589905,0.0035390176,0.000037379028,0.000027529044,0.0001943022,0.8466834],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812025,0.00045286224,0.000044639968,0.00029317473,0.00079210266,0.00029694362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973412,0.0007526254,0.000081769474,0.00011959056,0.0011289165,0.0005759029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016352229,0.00058745674,0.0003287685,0.00064782443,0.011797812,0.004867572,0.0010953221,0.0078086294,0.053989206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008647096,0.00042809866,0.00029344583,0.00032878856,0.003505735,0.0067350045,0.0025244914,0.010848178,0.015511766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028376526,0.0000051402753,0.00006888831,0.0000068980316,6.927331e-7,0.000049040085,0.000376847,0.000013426159,0.000038526192,0.014868088,0.97671586,0.007853761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012022563,0.000004091347,0.00011384494,0.00003653589,7.2153927e-7,0.000048333455,0.00067067,0.000034206223,0.00005354421,0.001909988,0.9971213,0.0000055183355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062338784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14118406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062338784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034141869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033874437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18061185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070669946","doi":"","title":"Putting the Train of Environmental Governance Back on Track: Nova Scotia's Experiment in Using Legislation to Strengthen Environmental Governance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Nova scotia; Corporate governance; Environmental governance; Prosperity; Environmental policy; Sustainable development","score_opus":0.026861468226415684,"score_gpt":0.26950803780168553,"score_spread":0.24264656957526984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070669946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9251009,0.0002173113,0.00017491054,0.016647115,0.00011668413,0.00014030914,0.00013176049,0.000015624883,0.057455268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760104,0.00013881033,0.00024022182,0.0058133905,0.000011597921,0.00006990913,0.00005167411,0.000012651443,0.017651247],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963372,0.0012765755,0.00008942315,0.00026541887,0.0005464756,0.0014849456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99355376,0.0024923468,0.00046777204,0.0004747593,0.0011292417,0.0018821871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004084317,0.00022795722,0.0004104763,0.00041791052,0.015732922,0.004420772,0.0012760473,0.0021254607,0.0029238472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008527712,0.0003594377,0.00034226358,0.0006908953,0.0051627643,0.0011426738,0.0047033317,0.0040589925,0.00028694377],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042860126,0.0027640725,0.28120655,0.00038892988,0.00040399728,0.019960048,0.38209143,0.005949219,0.013343628,0.07783846,0.103279635,0.10848804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001176092,0.0013124583,0.46320656,0.0004071922,0.00022722871,0.00054847496,0.28495333,0.002629874,0.0029868279,0.0063594575,0.23594381,0.00024881453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9638856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.988818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036114395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033975255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053939633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2465089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071098791","doi":"","title":"The rules of the Law society of Upper Canada, passed in convocation, Easter term, 52 Victoria, and approved by the visitors of the society.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Work (physics); Action (physics); Liability","score_opus":0.0043960915419094405,"score_gpt":0.17985006379490337,"score_spread":0.17545397225299392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071098791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041134432,0.007186817,0.0034986385,0.06422885,0.0040503433,0.0014745413,0.009269441,0.0007422974,0.8684145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07020138,0.0008909267,0.00271822,0.008444752,0.00012047921,0.00016714317,0.0006041759,0.0001448305,0.9167081],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993236,0.00039395565,0.00026175965,0.00036695044,0.003954623,0.0017866323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936237,0.00046374302,0.00014329371,0.00028041637,0.0040711355,0.0014177233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00280496,0.00058985973,0.00045120288,0.0014959652,0.017017776,0.010633005,0.0019095542,0.0054550664,0.015661398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011557523,0.0009997778,0.0005528908,0.0016482373,0.0043295077,0.0012848733,0.0021506748,0.008692607,0.00309381],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006669731,0.00008418506,0.0042507797,0.00012292726,0.000018375953,0.00042106002,0.008349983,0.00041862566,0.0014808491,0.27456248,0.6851199,0.025104113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014927268,0.00001795269,0.015261993,0.00012993728,0.0000129390155,0.00007584431,0.0032464564,0.00021195978,0.0005464359,0.0042532235,0.97615254,0.00007570564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9900017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99723816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064934865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.064934865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2466118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47113764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071106133","doi":"","title":"Prospectus and constitution together with some remarks on the present system of land transfer in Ontario and the Torrens' system of registration of title together with suggestions for the amendment of the present law of descent ...","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Prospectus; Amendment; Land registration; Legislation; Product (mathematics); Transfer (computing); Constitutional law","score_opus":0.01002880862855427,"score_gpt":0.19217285943441442,"score_spread":0.18214405080586016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071106133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012241512,0.008229829,0.0024498238,0.1968009,0.005335208,0.00029931185,0.0031065033,0.00018343984,0.7713535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13922209,0.0040710834,0.0032550455,0.05937987,0.0011857385,0.0003657893,0.000978057,0.00009368802,0.7914486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982957,0.00022375041,0.000084916275,0.00017708066,0.00069418806,0.00052437256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993438,0.0001727299,0.000059859573,0.000047970072,0.000305249,0.00007049442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015209052,0.00047260543,0.00029554093,0.0006117139,0.009364606,0.0037436949,0.0014269134,0.0054545724,0.0106332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027322164,0.00057156896,0.00040907363,0.0014619547,0.007304807,0.001822456,0.0012283495,0.0050260024,0.0019295105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003459458,0.0000150075175,0.000859116,0.00009162768,0.000004256767,0.00016360215,0.0064603616,0.00014457984,0.00034145793,0.59643126,0.39018938,0.005264716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000090838785,0.000013605861,0.006502403,0.000070365655,0.000005917654,0.000055721655,0.0015658676,0.000087279,0.00013379123,0.01825973,0.9732574,0.00003887977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8792086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96046996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9753034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024696587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026611162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24300545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071537452","doi":"","title":"Syntactic, Semantic, and Stylistic Variation in Old English Periphrastic Passives","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Participle; Resultative; Old English; Subject (documents); Scholarship; Agency (philosophy); Point (geometry); Embarrassment","score_opus":0.015889462446644496,"score_gpt":0.2426102533024937,"score_spread":0.2267207908558492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071537452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7950054,0.0009481248,0.02412097,0.00088296516,0.000105382365,0.00008143908,0.0004341904,0.00020806275,0.17821345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930737,0.00015494444,0.0015513127,0.000051124844,0.000034318688,0.00002616274,0.00012904516,0.00014338468,0.004835976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984291,0.0007338768,0.00012132207,0.00027434746,0.00031235337,0.00012902431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996861,0.0019171258,0.00030542974,0.00031570325,0.0005096891,0.00009114844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022196928,0.00032787988,0.00028121218,0.0017882736,0.0017432641,0.0039171726,0.00050919264,0.00046173678,0.004535406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004487754,0.0003689264,0.00018187794,0.0014371708,0.005619925,0.0052046627,0.001957943,0.0012283553,0.0006714512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002818994,0.000053531207,0.012746252,0.00040074464,0.000021829403,0.00084198226,0.40621468,0.00016012193,0.023568502,0.51600945,0.0021279845,0.037572987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011327933,0.00049699994,0.15519771,0.00048403902,0.00017331845,0.0049803304,0.2698886,0.004782741,0.018542469,0.10097351,0.44416502,0.00020196651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002086721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035720617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004535406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015651605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050577155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015172422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071684521","doi":"","title":"A Time and Manner to Die: a Study of Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Autonomy; Supreme court; Constitution; Natural (archaeology); Right to die; Bodily integrity; Human rights","score_opus":0.00891010096851918,"score_gpt":0.23550560469230017,"score_spread":0.22659550372378098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071684521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9144098,0.0036847335,0.00026179606,0.018317612,0.00013725238,0.00027791873,0.00090318214,0.000011360661,0.061996352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875102,0.0026142017,0.00024422744,0.0030520998,0.000026149797,0.000052119573,0.00030567445,0.000019800327,0.006175609],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99511343,0.0007471429,0.0001542198,0.00034070053,0.001481258,0.002163194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887368,0.0027144037,0.0011112266,0.00022257905,0.003650721,0.00356434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002456884,0.00035681567,0.0007646497,0.0031307065,0.030252997,0.0071239546,0.0035822184,0.0026219098,0.007551325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016214574,0.00039193433,0.0008669185,0.010757776,0.008223002,0.0033801333,0.0049411845,0.005736488,0.00036781933],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040011207,0.0010896901,0.32153866,0.00061138725,0.00013249808,0.001870697,0.48097643,0.0007815409,0.00037065012,0.11069753,0.036253247,0.045277547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000742009,0.00011440334,0.27402005,0.00082727487,0.00010109258,0.00040516898,0.65515876,0.0013057094,0.00013144681,0.004316804,0.06336746,0.00017772781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18145211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18145211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25369072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94939953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7073633302","doi":"","title":"The most dangerous branch how the Supreme Court of Canada has undermined our law and our democracy","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Democracy; Politics; Orthodoxy; Objectivity (philosophy); State (computer science); Rule of law","score_opus":0.038953201269414504,"score_gpt":0.27791095578489444,"score_spread":0.23895775451547993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7073633302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031438343,0.016761431,0.0018817275,0.36433122,0.0020359424,0.000027085942,0.00016785285,0.00008767807,0.58326876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.707176,0.0067276536,0.0011431868,0.064638436,0.0006346503,0.000021030051,0.00006694532,0.0000843572,0.21950774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971451,0.0006157902,0.000021939783,0.00019110076,0.0011761968,0.0008497527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985104,0.0003261542,0.0000775027,0.00006934641,0.00064911874,0.00036743964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014309257,0.00027905233,0.00022236694,0.00093211053,0.026184147,0.010674721,0.0010326884,0.0035421096,0.0048465203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035962602,0.00018306838,0.00020821617,0.0016419402,0.019757148,0.0031869884,0.0021297033,0.0056966576,0.0005122513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007636763,0.000007144062,0.0007856817,0.000021914162,0.0000042872202,0.00011508411,0.007719139,0.00011402845,0.00011375148,0.8513746,0.12804404,0.011692699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010833973,0.000009034598,0.0033701898,0.00021594383,0.000010834976,0.000102913466,0.014285982,0.00037436554,0.00035754297,0.10334201,0.8778865,0.000033806176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95107985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97985965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057487745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057487745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08393932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41710472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7093795733","doi":"","title":"9783035261547.pdf","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; French; Limiting; Human rights","score_opus":0.0343187840349348,"score_gpt":0.3013676023343425,"score_spread":0.2670488182994077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7093795733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027761166,0.00094214303,0.00062672363,0.0013950109,0.00096815825,0.00007027193,0.003695387,0.0007441527,0.9912806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018835983,0.0014307244,0.00043936807,0.00060792884,0.00019481785,0.000068014226,0.0029189072,0.0005281596,0.9919286],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989987,0.00013977555,0.00006528677,0.00014617834,0.0004840422,0.00016602795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980379,0.00041905223,0.000104399216,0.00028314473,0.0007094781,0.00044610302],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010841081,0.0007953486,0.0006423359,0.002271895,0.0019538472,0.009148025,0.001504094,0.0024858674,0.9160572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004246429,0.0004729944,0.0007038769,0.003728233,0.00088092143,0.0043813754,0.0042872797,0.0020625934,0.8899025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029344352,0.000027067157,0.00020718116,0.000303865,0.000003867495,0.00007277746,0.00017556445,0.000057467372,0.00023804668,0.008207036,0.79150474,0.19917297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003251743,0.000005157141,0.00023085551,0.00009395336,9.810038e-7,0.000036895406,0.00006452937,0.000012286845,0.00004966217,0.0004113253,0.9990876,0.0000035001513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046407795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005352808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08394277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011872556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024967836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11973411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7094102973","doi":"","title":"Review of &lt;i&gt;Canada's Indigenous Constitution&lt;/i&gt;. By John Borrows.","year":2011,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Insecta mundi","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Statement (logic); Indigenous rights; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.03044690901893472,"score_gpt":0.2654684075772588,"score_spread":0.2350214985583241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7094102973","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002612174,0.94754773,0.00007489001,0.023563785,0.0043377005,0.000009951045,0.00069755025,0.000024072748,0.02348308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01115389,0.92757654,0.0002607861,0.011889979,0.002387419,0.000017915474,0.0010057043,0.00005261459,0.0456551],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984188,0.00008349931,0.00006803923,0.00014353884,0.0010090452,0.0002770168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953441,0.0004188998,0.0002300052,0.0000990167,0.0033295155,0.00057847955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015079798,0.0009929688,0.00087364856,0.0077224025,0.004280403,0.0045652515,0.0019617856,0.0019335845,0.017719401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039619654,0.0005295456,0.00035998656,0.0164223,0.0045231385,0.0022023187,0.0012196788,0.0028191416,0.0036394417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017133818,0.000011454365,0.00034619862,0.0025944884,0.000020403164,0.00007273818,0.000489146,0.000124712,0.00008954631,0.013129672,0.8839663,0.09913819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015047576,0.0000020112966,0.0017692284,0.001242825,0.000007893808,0.000035215686,0.0002199216,0.000013329044,0.000027218335,0.00029644274,0.99637586,0.000008598913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94874275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9717794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051257253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050580423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11678733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36698842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095338573","doi":"","title":"Article Taking Account of Religion in Canada: The Debates over Gay and","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Economic Justice; Lesbian; Theme (computing)","score_opus":0.024578531780765803,"score_gpt":0.28743982790250805,"score_spread":0.26286129612174225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095338573","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14157034,0.034867004,0.0009676569,0.5425821,0.0027228931,0.00008897067,0.0004005807,0.000044188528,0.2767563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8962709,0.012374022,0.0008946853,0.04001448,0.00038064795,0.000023632138,0.00008415951,0.000036927333,0.04992048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99402785,0.0010018015,0.0001315527,0.00042137373,0.0026034934,0.0018138974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98957425,0.0031647484,0.0004575205,0.00024211952,0.0039427984,0.0026186767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048455405,0.0002813106,0.00038585975,0.0019099914,0.039343603,0.009751324,0.002290442,0.004881974,0.008499746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011900154,0.00029281984,0.00032184375,0.003397473,0.015897974,0.0025298258,0.003839772,0.0067093936,0.00031293638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010115432,0.00010656835,0.018015709,0.00043162404,0.000046072528,0.0013086516,0.14716071,0.0005732346,0.00091307133,0.54629385,0.19919161,0.08585774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003089461,0.000025873653,0.029354544,0.0009164979,0.00006077865,0.00023625014,0.12952672,0.00061609293,0.0006226957,0.020692123,0.8177688,0.00014866683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99616784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99832517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1698294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1698294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3256309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96288025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095673253","doi":"","title":"FUTURES: TRANSFORMING THE DELIVERY OF LEGAL SERVICES IN CANADA","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Permission; Legal service; Legislation; Legal research; Futures contract; Confidentiality","score_opus":0.010272274171671533,"score_gpt":0.24399726182205897,"score_spread":0.23372498765038743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095673253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06214111,0.00835368,0.0049108025,0.35519662,0.0015838906,0.00027837156,0.0024184892,0.00054187916,0.5645752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7307169,0.011226598,0.013687962,0.019652337,0.00025657506,0.0001405016,0.001397152,0.0003062294,0.22261572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99157435,0.0011431779,0.00012948658,0.00030251703,0.003069042,0.0037813873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900512,0.0008190347,0.00027558836,0.00023648923,0.0028083834,0.0058092796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052507482,0.000454747,0.00031452972,0.0019828046,0.019839332,0.011006718,0.002319304,0.0034865427,0.026040748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012337204,0.00042563883,0.00048381728,0.0039356165,0.007218285,0.0045403,0.0073377187,0.003612852,0.0015021125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006229129,0.00009094933,0.0052156383,0.00022305093,0.000017240653,0.0008139225,0.014322012,0.0017589767,0.00048910506,0.5244939,0.30270937,0.14980353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003107615,0.000038513794,0.012167235,0.0004701046,0.00001572325,0.00015538475,0.026471771,0.002274663,0.0003446901,0.036020074,0.9219212,0.00008962158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99463105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99640936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18982258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18982258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.52176464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93969095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095740046","doi":"","title":"Co-counsel to Her Majesty in Right Of Newfoundland and Labrador","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Population; Government (linguistics); Period (music)","score_opus":0.0253128589518021,"score_gpt":0.3087215900289601,"score_spread":0.283408731077158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095740046","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10435961,0.0067305206,0.0015880781,0.48197898,0.009600713,0.00024681,0.00072523166,0.0003021679,0.3944679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09852785,0.0011179872,0.0009391543,0.0626896,0.00031276463,0.0000557362,0.00011638267,0.00009274005,0.83614767],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967434,0.00036176553,0.00009489825,0.0004045746,0.00058947835,0.0018059578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910665,0.0014783747,0.00031009436,0.00030993356,0.0024000474,0.0044349576],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002027665,0.00034305413,0.00064694835,0.0011803916,0.034641076,0.0041432385,0.0014970012,0.004788286,0.07050834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008868739,0.0005625294,0.00037149363,0.0005248447,0.0028033934,0.0019485237,0.0039378977,0.010047502,0.007323073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006326336,0.00014994151,0.016129235,0.000073652656,0.000045990106,0.008733233,0.016725322,0.00015269847,0.0011275639,0.020868378,0.8961884,0.03974239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012634888,0.000025152336,0.012757104,0.00016985933,0.000030705072,0.0027075359,0.025504185,0.000107549255,0.00066784077,0.0012479722,0.95672,0.000049538114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.756326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9414846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92949164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019089473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03811162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49021804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095881176","doi":"","title":"1 Canada Opposes The United Nations ’ Declaration Of 2007 Recognizing The Rights Of Indigenous Peoples: Is Canada’s Strident Opposition An Anomaly Or A Symptom Of A Troubling Transformational Shift In Canadian Values?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Indigenous; Human rights; Declaration; Globalization; Indigenous rights; General assembly; Islam","score_opus":0.06550172098162407,"score_gpt":0.30350571756649564,"score_spread":0.23800399658487156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095881176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25140578,0.014978203,0.00063553086,0.30281767,0.001209961,0.00006406012,0.0009129398,0.0000603106,0.42791554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87634283,0.0060491003,0.0006753461,0.04260416,0.00014385092,0.000019141327,0.0002081392,0.000034467703,0.07392295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952193,0.00039863127,0.000052023734,0.00028192293,0.0021282497,0.0019198275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957717,0.0010305064,0.00036630098,0.00007712961,0.0018691659,0.0008852374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016062304,0.00032259763,0.00028401898,0.001403209,0.035128698,0.010476765,0.0018755775,0.0046622497,0.006442563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005132548,0.00023302717,0.00025906807,0.002933243,0.011388461,0.0019133996,0.0030218817,0.00452105,0.00034558034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007655544,0.00008912464,0.024932127,0.00036838578,0.000036635076,0.001962899,0.12902394,0.00042280072,0.0009154395,0.51091224,0.2792294,0.05203036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015307172,0.000043658383,0.041896526,0.0005986058,0.000041267413,0.00046885776,0.13251482,0.00041488238,0.00061696646,0.013081194,0.81013423,0.00017367206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117692605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.117692605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2092139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8539236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096320376","doi":"","title":"Inclusion, Voice, and Process-Based","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Framing (construction); Social rights; Charter; Democracy; Fundamental rights; Human rights","score_opus":0.020899298453024046,"score_gpt":0.32945860799561044,"score_spread":0.30855930954258637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096320376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02065824,0.004421377,0.057352293,0.025009604,0.000692133,0.00021240972,0.00006591804,0.00012497217,0.891463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92587733,0.0016633311,0.012075375,0.0023907681,0.00047679187,0.00047125376,0.00008396748,0.00014109554,0.056819964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97791415,0.011459428,0.0007020704,0.0024727022,0.005098323,0.002353388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852742,0.008262709,0.0014564295,0.0020832138,0.0016510923,0.001272376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020803796,0.00087538426,0.0008541974,0.0038935055,0.01144462,0.019563641,0.0026375153,0.0043473574,0.008604347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022853691,0.00040764306,0.0008006957,0.0026291995,0.057111442,0.020122966,0.022620648,0.004950062,0.0012021759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009764742,0.000013809474,0.00028278714,0.00004508549,0.0000034239697,0.000057716825,0.017674642,0.00008087766,0.000093307295,0.9730688,0.0006388755,0.0080307955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017283406,0.000028925022,0.00049879326,0.00030514476,0.000018304807,0.0001465102,0.012000764,0.0003197981,0.0004629617,0.8714019,0.11478142,0.000018292627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008140386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057432065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020803796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008680322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010257239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11002231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096397332","doi":"","title":"SHOULD THE CHRA MIRROR THE CHARTER?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Human rights; Inequality; Common ground; Civil rights","score_opus":0.07566578135411474,"score_gpt":0.34813659580989936,"score_spread":0.27247081445578464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096397332","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062248046,0.003273699,0.0060433703,0.72303444,0.013737828,0.00017170647,0.000721714,0.00045315034,0.24633937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21711637,0.0043534273,0.018730162,0.46307385,0.0020830093,0.00031717226,0.0007920366,0.0004641745,0.29306987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98052084,0.0023112444,0.00036006293,0.0017178446,0.010683779,0.0044062757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98866373,0.0016754523,0.0004587584,0.00074646994,0.0071669114,0.0012887308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009644509,0.0005361156,0.0004940821,0.0011829068,0.010495215,0.013111451,0.0038767885,0.009177163,0.011283445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030703817,0.0004213941,0.0006946814,0.0013410373,0.012194202,0.0071362117,0.00198215,0.011651879,0.0028004874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024966359,0.000024853756,0.00045980353,0.000046200854,0.000004894438,0.00006864358,0.0020551072,0.00022653615,0.0002381087,0.62334865,0.3533498,0.02015244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002311137,0.000026243591,0.0018854111,0.00016676313,0.000011489,0.000038443006,0.0033064664,0.00037960938,0.0003730399,0.025388952,0.9682986,0.00010187387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95080596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9427001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049194038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04669106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1323394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33876896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096534072","doi":"","title":"The Attorney General for Ontario, the Attorney General for New Brunswick, the Attorney General of British Columbia, the Attorney General for Alberta,","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Power of attorney; Confidentiality; Defense attorney; Liability; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.035949213124430765,"score_gpt":0.29291918367504605,"score_spread":0.25696997055061527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096534072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042569023,0.010723806,0.0018159774,0.2173193,0.011899158,0.0028019734,0.014020847,0.0017933896,0.69705653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010719832,0.0013038415,0.0005691368,0.008664856,0.00024561243,0.00010278222,0.0010409565,0.00016333845,0.9771896],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912054,0.0003120711,0.00045996255,0.0008418401,0.003940272,0.0032403574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9729548,0.0017987264,0.0006098326,0.000657335,0.018121332,0.0058579524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004160746,0.00109435,0.0010711551,0.0040772413,0.025142165,0.006383362,0.0033045544,0.009307339,0.13613701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014024066,0.0023056045,0.0009131864,0.0033268633,0.0024627915,0.0017532026,0.0021557217,0.0068466826,0.0277522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009612803,0.00007287317,0.0101034865,0.00010821961,0.000026684678,0.0006352621,0.0006609547,0.0001762528,0.0007791203,0.004860042,0.95951647,0.022964671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075908945,0.000049358965,0.04779467,0.00015101465,0.00006712639,0.00028866561,0.0026317202,0.0004885767,0.0004505151,0.00064858526,0.94726175,0.000092159295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9696745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9925464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13613701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06413612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2833861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46534228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096717024","doi":"","title":"REVIEW","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Harassment; Charter; Racism; Sexual orientation; Obligation; Ethnic group; Citizenship","score_opus":0.06275382254897376,"score_gpt":0.3701225108715663,"score_spread":0.3073686883225925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096717024","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00054181373,0.8914927,0.0013925553,0.016851494,0.01114328,0.0012792634,0.008200906,0.0003123263,0.0687857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0039150934,0.94734806,0.0019131133,0.012174273,0.0028938835,0.00085424574,0.0051607825,0.00010367813,0.025636876],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709904,0.00070718286,0.0006309033,0.00030724495,0.0010614492,0.00019413857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892001,0.0038139801,0.0012601021,0.0005763839,0.004661851,0.00048754175],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032257913,0.0008262974,0.002120434,0.0062677846,0.0010500996,0.0035846396,0.003011762,0.0025531373,0.14057146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021594629,0.00043534787,0.0016780548,0.0061981077,0.0007416169,0.0028926549,0.0017489592,0.0018881218,0.04106205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016087762,0.00005770941,0.0002927837,0.08263907,0.00024398738,0.00024959288,0.00015700723,0.00011814492,0.00023979522,0.0035627307,0.5194287,0.39284962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003299551,0.00003512655,0.0005114277,0.04832067,0.0002285178,0.00032477072,0.00007534913,0.000014757025,0.000069786576,0.00084572285,0.9495294,0.000011440687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063656876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011338941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8594285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032102694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0146405995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096719219","doi":"","title":"IV. Membership of Council 5 V. Parliamentary Authority and Procedures 6 VI. Meetings of Council 7","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Constitution; Power (physics); Teaching staff; Social work; Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.09302011390302259,"score_gpt":0.31337514665548594,"score_spread":0.22035503275246335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096719219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075879325,0.0009611458,0.0036912502,0.01154416,0.0020768521,0.00064304605,0.0011961573,0.0003017229,0.9719977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11371614,0.0005354564,0.0057402845,0.012315144,0.00095796585,0.00089410756,0.0013983909,0.0002282969,0.86421424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884511,0.0020275982,0.00076349993,0.0014716644,0.00399823,0.0032878432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914027,0.0012791383,0.0008981274,0.0011515226,0.0039794515,0.0012891325],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005010508,0.00047537283,0.0004110309,0.0011933367,0.0068810694,0.007444718,0.0022357916,0.008582681,0.031110683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018368606,0.0006701046,0.0007142812,0.001132357,0.0023095214,0.0023761606,0.0032959953,0.0068946644,0.021277737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007715868,0.00008727495,0.001969601,0.00015100656,0.00001711777,0.00023790651,0.0036593827,0.00029680305,0.000839745,0.5696057,0.39182085,0.031237466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015447777,0.000030332743,0.003917053,0.00013430856,0.000008348659,0.00005624695,0.00063480827,0.00017804469,0.00034657848,0.010492373,0.9841589,0.000027564096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055202615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047038484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9688893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007237079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015690528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10976255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096919844","doi":"","title":"Protecting Whose Security?: Anti-Terrorism Legislation and the Criminalization of Dissent","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Criminalization; Dissent; Politics; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Terrorism; Social movement","score_opus":0.02040571565901589,"score_gpt":0.3007463978456916,"score_spread":0.28034068218667574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096919844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17652152,0.023606664,0.001258933,0.2790701,0.0019813331,0.000096845266,0.00018933935,0.000021748154,0.5172535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649774,0.008350062,0.00029096854,0.009566869,0.0010525031,0.000089378584,0.000055742064,0.000021249834,0.0155958375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98785245,0.006967213,0.00031188392,0.00065617426,0.0017532038,0.0024591042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97091436,0.022285238,0.0034742444,0.00059662294,0.0015795296,0.0011500092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013492906,0.00030887502,0.00033667652,0.0028264686,0.009137191,0.011593825,0.0019813143,0.0059937043,0.0074981614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027546693,0.00026839582,0.00039034535,0.0043817875,0.026414506,0.0083509395,0.0046578306,0.0063444385,0.0005377116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008161461,0.000102667036,0.005468653,0.00018998385,0.000016111599,0.00060891523,0.07442412,0.00032124584,0.00008673922,0.8590515,0.034127064,0.025521299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103880484,0.00014438918,0.077153236,0.0026192123,0.000045757544,0.0003793631,0.24687578,0.001182672,0.000911557,0.21768409,0.452775,0.00012503496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.071051836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.070505925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071051836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02077709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014375781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15074903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097520795","doi":"","title":"Crime and the Insanity Defense,","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insanity; Plea; Commission; Criminal law; Governor; Value (mathematics); Expansive; Pleasure; Convict","score_opus":0.039396452483419234,"score_gpt":0.3096013881162225,"score_spread":0.2702049356328033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097520795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099929295,0.07265506,0.0009934991,0.17787908,0.0020559058,0.00004755795,0.0003746513,0.000014658836,0.6460503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.913048,0.014547981,0.00037062322,0.015140879,0.0008781093,0.000063660096,0.00024504107,0.000010916476,0.055694744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988789,0.00041871518,0.00003617899,0.0001130095,0.00016759463,0.0003856778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998934,0.00033252573,0.00024791257,0.000051745676,0.00018496533,0.0002489149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008365449,0.00033261348,0.00019975331,0.0012870046,0.0044293767,0.0041681794,0.00078166433,0.0033169142,0.009057499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026835075,0.0001590811,0.00023997271,0.0009982958,0.012583331,0.0028214802,0.0029516586,0.0037589585,0.00070662104],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010273059,0.000049498958,0.005470249,0.000037200432,0.000008885667,0.0001692736,0.0037507422,0.000078989506,0.0000261606,0.96277726,0.019292718,0.00832871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025222811,0.00006955686,0.042519674,0.0007362496,0.000021827005,0.001044693,0.016426058,0.00047151075,0.00013112987,0.5048922,0.43361682,0.000044984256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04960264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12401194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04960264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037192658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072517195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098627806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097988389","doi":"","title":"Title of Thesis: The Inherent Right of the Haudenosaunee to Criminal Justice Jurisdiction in Canada: A Preliminary Inquiry","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Legislation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.04189791110701258,"score_gpt":0.29971143975288983,"score_spread":0.25781352864587725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097988389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6518342,0.002968604,0.0012704306,0.11991848,0.00054711825,0.00046865118,0.0017362469,0.000016274558,0.22123992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97349787,0.0010871473,0.00049890403,0.00693539,0.0000987036,0.000072195675,0.0001538351,0.000013215631,0.017642558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941299,0.00078138965,0.00021364429,0.0008131551,0.002434327,0.0016276259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97378236,0.00996679,0.0014827116,0.0005762993,0.0109827975,0.0032089795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062831547,0.0002001056,0.0006448701,0.0017572506,0.024705425,0.015940448,0.0032358707,0.0031442794,0.010114081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035522386,0.00029787893,0.00035434295,0.0032038565,0.009697718,0.003322158,0.00312006,0.0041066185,0.00041066765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029634527,0.00022599856,0.15080348,0.00059459225,0.00008256288,0.00083574,0.18598765,0.0009614887,0.001069389,0.5568347,0.06175017,0.04055784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011442858,0.000087978915,0.21463066,0.0018795372,0.00019471372,0.00032590877,0.52372247,0.0015291768,0.0012126551,0.043614764,0.2125065,0.00018130077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99120796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073789194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.073789194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21787499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5353806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102759388","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0052","title":"Transforming spousal support from the ground up: Carol Rogerson and the development of the spousal support advisory guidelines","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Negotiation; Economic Justice; Work (physics); Exaggeration; Set (abstract data type); Advisory committee","score_opus":0.0265818875826978,"score_gpt":0.27782091103299517,"score_spread":0.25123902345029736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102759388","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008213267,0.0066155475,0.003090248,0.92855483,0.002460079,0.00005603862,0.000020483607,0.00005353672,0.05093602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5793429,0.015333126,0.01917863,0.27945298,0.0023282047,0.0003041114,0.0000521276,0.00036246103,0.103645526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96859264,0.01625387,0.00078565197,0.0015537924,0.008962215,0.003851915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94474614,0.025773184,0.0014124,0.0013703938,0.017052103,0.009645815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027049042,0.00040838303,0.00048273674,0.001971691,0.031799354,0.015288656,0.002658081,0.010580293,0.0030806973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061360717,0.00077578606,0.00041020944,0.001544788,0.04176222,0.009216695,0.0054021482,0.021301592,0.00063269894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019140149,0.000039719343,0.001323927,0.000058364833,0.000007197832,0.00048506554,0.091178365,0.00026591175,0.00018217864,0.48477888,0.38370088,0.037960287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018009187,0.000016099882,0.0005600363,0.00036506765,0.000009012571,0.00016505599,0.047000997,0.0002883873,0.00028228044,0.041264676,0.90991044,0.000119847056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.727563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83037513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.727563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051109254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12631786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5480828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104451281","doi":"10.1093/9780198922469.003.0001","title":"Looking for Common Ground","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Charter; Indigenous rights; Common law; Individualism; Multiculturalism; Variety (cybernetics)","score_opus":0.0507397096041196,"score_gpt":0.3379790812979454,"score_spread":0.2872393716938258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104451281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002630569,0.0019820356,0.0036597322,0.020983359,0.00075916934,0.0000423732,0.00004667814,0.00004508075,0.969851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3743508,0.0030237054,0.0052940045,0.013807671,0.00074529485,0.00011251121,0.00019603132,0.00027513286,0.6021948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955674,0.0010231102,0.000093472634,0.0008361579,0.0013925543,0.0010872572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981706,0.0005099053,0.000094522446,0.0003368915,0.00046571973,0.00042231937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036687495,0.00061346573,0.0009221138,0.0027372674,0.021187808,0.018616281,0.0025029823,0.004950846,0.040027898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006002634,0.0003606502,0.0008534547,0.0023965677,0.04267807,0.013773649,0.011929294,0.009273444,0.0046398966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017508337,0.0000032759797,0.00003050317,0.00000682472,0.0000011245404,0.000031509135,0.0029722222,0.000025799642,0.000016963135,0.98229194,0.010837636,0.0037804937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053127806,0.000009343207,0.00014700268,0.00021530382,0.0000045383463,0.000065915556,0.0076840585,0.0001268466,0.000089686204,0.3041366,0.6875045,0.000010870991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12587324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20142782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12587324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02565631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024585024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25028116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7105719249","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5745662","title":"Pepa v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration): There's Only one Reasonable Interpretation…Yet Again","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of Fredericton","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Supreme court; Statutory law; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.012135033421399755,"score_gpt":0.26497422035880575,"score_spread":0.252839186937406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7105719249","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02323268,0.006815521,0.0028588255,0.48030567,0.0022845024,0.000065046464,0.001424113,0.00010982733,0.4829038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62606406,0.004800144,0.002584978,0.24523899,0.0013765357,0.00013492824,0.00044268533,0.00012773725,0.11922993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952632,0.0004746839,0.000116324525,0.0005441043,0.0017317302,0.0018699226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963651,0.001308741,0.00019245736,0.00013795425,0.0015174715,0.00047831054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002976126,0.00055054785,0.0009218433,0.001470021,0.015946852,0.011936852,0.002870289,0.014834653,0.017004078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010544517,0.0004822366,0.0006155478,0.0028645857,0.017078232,0.0052915243,0.003013071,0.014922209,0.0012971973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027486272,0.000009842626,0.0008489367,0.0000615309,0.000016409016,0.00012338057,0.003130166,0.000061246494,0.000093111405,0.9066265,0.084559195,0.0044421474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001167784,0.00003081539,0.010708009,0.0012426754,0.00016182735,0.000260543,0.023944868,0.0005689808,0.0008603254,0.48346817,0.4784467,0.00019019603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93625575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9426178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06374425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025866682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06689901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18767679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7110669277","doi":"","title":"I Believe in the Holy Catholic Church","year":2020,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - St. Norbert College (St. Norbert College)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SAINT; Protestantism; Sacred theology; Sister; Catholic theology; Systematic theology; Editorial board; Christianity","score_opus":0.03816959391634666,"score_gpt":0.2872816244421194,"score_spread":0.24911203052577274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7110669277","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016996615,0.013132156,0.0021891238,0.61105776,0.027946375,0.00006136371,0.00010939504,0.00020422136,0.32830295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38192376,0.007930244,0.0026840686,0.2629378,0.0066568763,0.000075084514,0.000116693795,0.00035483943,0.33732057],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979674,0.0008241981,0.00003346752,0.00021321175,0.0005489055,0.00041278685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968579,0.00036180016,0.00019026769,0.0002590939,0.0006135172,0.0017174261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023745853,0.000306686,0.00034587667,0.0003571187,0.009997823,0.005479412,0.0006294856,0.0020388674,0.02094877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059173093,0.00025984878,0.00023140605,0.00026852865,0.009128635,0.0039122584,0.0040006656,0.009832752,0.0052816267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003888383,0.00005231633,0.0021771558,0.000103659964,0.00002013271,0.00033139897,0.0412443,0.000031126947,0.00036591874,0.114094086,0.80447495,0.037066024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008290032,0.000019744608,0.0007846941,0.00018811629,0.000005280684,0.00025110116,0.023166565,0.000030735508,0.00007407826,0.010535586,0.9649226,0.000013073184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052050822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015096219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02094877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019788456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028988488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07008064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7111787380","doi":"","title":"Critical Conversations in Canadian Public Law","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public law; Critical race theory; Racism; Critical legal studies; Scholarship; Critical theory; Comparative law; Law reform; State (computer science); Indigenous","score_opus":0.02667086835374095,"score_gpt":0.3117404324428568,"score_spread":0.2850695640891159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7111787380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05894675,0.02603817,0.0025738555,0.3233941,0.0035622464,0.0001763989,0.0005905212,0.0002540677,0.58446395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83059454,0.009824003,0.0017720909,0.042035766,0.00063766923,0.00019364383,0.00025472167,0.00025981446,0.114427716],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845323,0.004302598,0.00028989546,0.0011142074,0.004824997,0.0049360446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803643,0.008938376,0.000698676,0.0005360072,0.006655083,0.002807521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0109185465,0.0009483656,0.00075501594,0.0052378727,0.091994114,0.02358854,0.0036123297,0.009653038,0.015705986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026970487,0.0006432879,0.0005563741,0.0072530173,0.05138271,0.008719038,0.008408229,0.008490139,0.0011474737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000363644,0.000026843873,0.0007513692,0.00017872166,0.000008692535,0.0008219134,0.3960479,0.00025202977,0.00030148367,0.37567177,0.20496054,0.020942373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063728075,0.0000055759024,0.001106585,0.0003884175,0.000009294301,0.00009205344,0.19278519,0.00014255829,0.00018087277,0.016388701,0.788833,0.00006133923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98366493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32198122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.32198122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28645197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7864057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7113043087","doi":"","title":"Deciding on Death: Rodriguez, Carter, and Medically Assisted Dying in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Legalization; Politics; Legislature; Assisted suicide; Legislation; Criminalization; Constitutional right; Position (finance)","score_opus":0.026106561099123713,"score_gpt":0.28860400097992134,"score_spread":0.2624974398807976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7113043087","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01902505,0.041869365,0.00041980334,0.78113145,0.005401005,0.00006472706,0.00013836173,0.000036172765,0.15191415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36718926,0.075976446,0.0014113307,0.42621997,0.0025511116,0.00009441143,0.00018615401,0.00014707384,0.12622434],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953916,0.0007726914,0.00008794541,0.00026726583,0.001517593,0.0019629558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99310887,0.002108661,0.00024334634,0.00008135743,0.0018577465,0.0025999383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040769493,0.0003777656,0.00061186374,0.0010450702,0.048544846,0.010774053,0.0029990815,0.00940205,0.004916577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010478169,0.0006163286,0.000476127,0.002620228,0.019098558,0.0035095585,0.003450302,0.017255984,0.00043180888],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003810223,0.000056266515,0.0022079353,0.00014822258,0.0000150066135,0.0012107461,0.034593213,0.00038216813,0.0001586349,0.2492452,0.68560684,0.026337557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004746832,0.00002535031,0.006535556,0.0007916787,0.00004032551,0.0003960038,0.06238499,0.00034805737,0.00016071595,0.027232938,0.9018393,0.00019753774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.992677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17220178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17220178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32788262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9601286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114833834","doi":"","title":"Equal Justice Under Law: Civil Recourse Theory, Access to Justice and the Rule of Law in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Rule of law; Public law; Work (physics); Inequality; Common law","score_opus":0.02814838000223407,"score_gpt":0.3175592319236567,"score_spread":0.28941085192142263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114833834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43315592,0.00911106,0.0032747367,0.08842658,0.00031021528,0.00016810777,0.0007635012,0.00004848485,0.46474144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719339,0.0018090977,0.0006304978,0.0017633442,0.000036518737,0.000024940762,0.00005954108,0.000021672258,0.023720488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99576145,0.0005913928,0.000096127784,0.00042279754,0.0008488358,0.0022794278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99268264,0.0026792113,0.00033986813,0.0002181159,0.0022239455,0.0018563028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003840699,0.00033894682,0.0008907753,0.0022883553,0.028076526,0.015015418,0.0030289018,0.0051501472,0.014262694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016730506,0.00047484157,0.0005009252,0.0051526157,0.016788661,0.0059168604,0.0040435605,0.0068879738,0.0003677676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047493264,0.00009528362,0.009829831,0.00006468953,0.000021664806,0.00025325594,0.01686603,0.0014283882,0.00007305543,0.940626,0.014116077,0.016578084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015166348,0.00007127562,0.06786567,0.0008048287,0.00018882405,0.0002939504,0.104088224,0.012398281,0.00051406864,0.59976673,0.21354118,0.0003152972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9974246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1437553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1437553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2620758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99312246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114922838","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5876143","title":"Working with Bertha Wilson: Perspectives on Liberty, Judicial Decision-Making and a Judge’s Role","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Legislation; Order (exchange); Scope (computer science); Judicial review","score_opus":0.015222198507159031,"score_gpt":0.30333092976503145,"score_spread":0.2881087312578724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114922838","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011471792,0.048679654,0.007472705,0.78603303,0.003718162,0.000024969555,0.000053304822,0.000023548018,0.1425229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7502427,0.020087918,0.0075792917,0.11588425,0.0068744207,0.00016590784,0.000039395145,0.0002504269,0.0988757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98908037,0.007615404,0.00018870312,0.0012225414,0.00089274737,0.0010002102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98253006,0.014744043,0.0004970051,0.00046713627,0.00095403724,0.0008077212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013778437,0.0011511012,0.0010759676,0.0023300692,0.019603342,0.022342443,0.0030068948,0.027337752,0.010543169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022517197,0.0007338711,0.000679691,0.0034717973,0.047179352,0.03132125,0.005237043,0.022533463,0.0011149463],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012218576,0.000013687432,0.00004329491,0.000024588977,0.0000058541004,0.00010245339,0.008760354,0.00009631776,0.00004313977,0.96467996,0.02384746,0.0023706804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021908683,0.000008181518,0.00010176651,0.0001764499,0.000005845779,0.00007102578,0.007854539,0.00024290687,0.00014657971,0.8575087,0.13382827,0.000033757213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030287957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039293732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030287957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01126036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007344467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08170003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115008836","doi":"10.2307/jj.36075940","title":"Critical Conversations in Canadian Public Law","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book","venue":"Les Presses de l’Université d’Ottawa | University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.027613002720031015,"score_gpt":0.24780625807184714,"score_spread":0.22019325535181614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115008836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030110925,0.019135458,0.00089397334,0.17785667,0.0015490738,0.000089583606,0.00027692734,0.00009264315,0.7699948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7367742,0.0062994934,0.0009938504,0.02062197,0.00046100141,0.0001666989,0.00014180268,0.00020920453,0.23433174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826341,0.004419408,0.00034791697,0.001241103,0.004474277,0.0068832627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814244,0.008983289,0.0005812609,0.000798106,0.004888738,0.0033242803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011028644,0.001203137,0.0010470853,0.0070067705,0.09680458,0.035624575,0.0046746195,0.014780525,0.030265976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032516025,0.0013910446,0.000669974,0.012384368,0.05567151,0.012676594,0.009573527,0.015752362,0.0014263198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023783998,0.000020123327,0.00030717492,0.000060337086,0.0000060823045,0.00018388695,0.074444056,0.00015746483,0.000049278297,0.81620055,0.10001258,0.00853475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024071995,0.000009206611,0.0023901768,0.00041186574,0.000020927278,0.00007989827,0.096262194,0.0003118172,0.00016031637,0.08831462,0.81191576,0.00009924875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99257106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38047114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.38047114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3341472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7185657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116219076","doi":"","title":"Tribe v. White Quills, 03-C-6177 (Blkft. Tr. Ct. App., Sept. 23, 2004)","year":2004,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"The Mathematics Enthusiast","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Hopi; Criminal Conviction; Criminal jurisdiction; Tribe; Conviction","score_opus":0.03169936152277048,"score_gpt":0.2933698564114382,"score_spread":0.2616704948886677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116219076","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018224614,0.0017239543,0.00064743124,0.013539664,0.0005643195,0.00018013234,0.0033324154,0.0003260895,0.96146125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0413009,0.00045188426,0.00029320692,0.017143432,0.000057339905,0.000107809574,0.00086795667,0.00005420783,0.93972325],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929416,0.000038338225,0.000020237112,0.00008009782,0.00028463354,0.00028255428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995351,0.00010709739,0.000017854467,0.000017737144,0.00022789121,0.00009425155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005107214,0.00046684025,0.00025425988,0.00072614977,0.010933909,0.0031759585,0.0009120726,0.004684069,0.10448254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016459611,0.00073801563,0.00038779483,0.0005380025,0.00083320687,0.0012607997,0.0010563884,0.0035668297,0.023988714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009303369,0.000106076404,0.0048178886,0.0000740958,0.000008613952,0.001313253,0.0009819062,0.00011207962,0.0014352672,0.027078476,0.94277614,0.021203257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006433874,0.00009405008,0.01695351,0.00023515403,0.000028019573,0.0004590606,0.0014528512,0.00063106033,0.0011947489,0.0028990773,0.9759334,0.000054794822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4034854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7769355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4034854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047873612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007791451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8022737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116224082","doi":"","title":"Sexual Assault, Fault and the Charter","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Mens rea; Conviction; Supreme court; Legislative intent; Legislature; Criminal law; Legislation","score_opus":0.017736123235448955,"score_gpt":0.2905168983114676,"score_spread":0.27278077507601867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116224082","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14759389,0.011054666,0.0071632527,0.1241574,0.0013614306,0.000090273476,0.00022918014,0.00008903053,0.70826083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96353954,0.0019757322,0.001472904,0.0065185274,0.00015815861,0.000022796276,0.000044052496,0.000020950243,0.026247337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935288,0.0013127523,0.00014698756,0.00031708705,0.0031253926,0.0015690174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952192,0.0017825078,0.0005856896,0.00035589453,0.0015183776,0.0005383457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040484583,0.00021625911,0.00027376498,0.0014369895,0.011970213,0.006421266,0.001139705,0.0027900988,0.0034301141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012805826,0.00021251863,0.00027093213,0.0011798352,0.03550655,0.0034491215,0.0029685518,0.005044153,0.00023149695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010449825,0.000007980709,0.0015820096,0.000013201303,0.0000015226541,0.00012028873,0.0055705886,0.00023070836,0.0000687507,0.9771427,0.0054873214,0.009764365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046759422,0.000088520035,0.026562283,0.00052476383,0.00003510241,0.00058910094,0.030838093,0.0013465687,0.000995408,0.39400545,0.5447855,0.000182425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8415186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8761273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8415186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0307943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059494823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31882948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7119496777","doi":"10.3138/9781487519117-013/html#mla","title":"A Role for Human Dignity under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Dignity; Human rights; Legislation; Bill of rights","score_opus":0.02102249728237336,"score_gpt":0.27593739965432035,"score_spread":0.25491490237194697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7119496777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030798467,0.004190162,0.004288617,0.21806547,0.0016564701,0.00009816689,0.00021989275,0.000065636734,0.74061704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8772415,0.0018830455,0.0046631787,0.03309087,0.00046762536,0.00010428393,0.00006944211,0.00009748627,0.082382485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817391,0.0037418404,0.0003883749,0.0019022333,0.0054554315,0.0067729945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98622674,0.003538109,0.00039389794,0.0009388207,0.00577673,0.0031257607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013408567,0.0006945573,0.0010202145,0.0021553596,0.03432297,0.018675521,0.0034670164,0.015303062,0.009206351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020755453,0.0006275418,0.0009914256,0.0019745172,0.06557557,0.008201012,0.008113162,0.018076591,0.0005634975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000108150625,0.000008537366,0.00026912632,0.000012173522,0.0000032459675,0.000047600624,0.004966351,0.00010512798,0.000056957935,0.9777174,0.012152418,0.004650348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067585606,0.000039071892,0.004399837,0.00053410704,0.000059052472,0.00016891948,0.018579967,0.00087956764,0.0003577704,0.5312385,0.44345698,0.0002186035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9723022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.980552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10198635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10198635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24446493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7399662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124434997","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i3.2236","title":"Competing Constitutional Rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Democracy; Limiting; Competition (biology); State (computer science); Fundamental rights","score_opus":0.03810785600891519,"score_gpt":0.3240699980064703,"score_spread":0.2859621419975551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124434997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010184239,0.00072073715,0.018021895,0.009437944,0.00020841771,0.00021727059,0.0003499896,0.00008080503,0.9607787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76708823,0.0010671848,0.022378793,0.012769162,0.00035609124,0.00057517894,0.00064041564,0.0001430512,0.19498181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9621176,0.0071952725,0.0014543335,0.005452534,0.016668905,0.007111354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829904,0.006458496,0.0005536114,0.0035329296,0.005309003,0.0011556235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024693301,0.0009686665,0.0012718872,0.0027960327,0.013725444,0.016368303,0.0047630393,0.007806491,0.02549938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031133633,0.00067460985,0.0012823713,0.0028516203,0.025678985,0.008663511,0.008569404,0.0074047595,0.0021506238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029466269,0.0000033222075,0.00009311362,0.000008990274,0.0000029276803,0.00002912849,0.0007922832,0.000062609346,0.00008129658,0.99477094,0.0017906497,0.0023617581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037168087,0.000030337502,0.0010694761,0.000293406,0.00006066624,0.00019852445,0.0030586047,0.0011926511,0.000734886,0.65502214,0.33821914,0.00008296212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2706052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35301048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2706052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03310501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056853313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5380602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125700347","doi":"10.1515/9781773855196-062","title":"7.4 Re Constitution of Canada, 1981: The Patriation Reference","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Subject (documents); Government (linguistics); Legislation; Criticism","score_opus":0.04361789889990325,"score_gpt":0.23184964454320636,"score_spread":0.1882317456433031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125700347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034371645,0.015476743,0.0008525991,0.03540043,0.0013131822,0.000080201324,0.0006029661,0.00006835271,0.9427685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.063943714,0.0052789296,0.0010730427,0.02523939,0.00028840892,0.00011470715,0.00027758535,0.00009968096,0.90368456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972126,0.0002446522,0.000060800565,0.00021089133,0.0012193709,0.0010518524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890566,0.00014957284,0.000031344218,0.000056528384,0.0007528889,0.00010398232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011672527,0.00084647135,0.00041244391,0.0020085645,0.015580606,0.008271965,0.0018455565,0.00879529,0.02244088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034652657,0.0005185355,0.00061063335,0.0025983206,0.0072123795,0.0024741432,0.002031223,0.0072343764,0.00396814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010053592,0.00001257813,0.00027782138,0.000047139234,0.0000036455688,0.00012084387,0.002757535,0.00013937992,0.000123964,0.7552928,0.23095661,0.010257579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005917923,0.000004042305,0.0014071127,0.0001791017,0.0000061230903,0.000049145103,0.00134368,0.00007823994,0.0002166358,0.024092326,0.9725955,0.000022295808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95025826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9808171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9492874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0507126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.078191064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3679474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125703467","doi":"10.1515/9781773855196-090","title":"10.8 40 Years On, Canada’s Charter of Rights Is a Beacon to the World","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Human rights; Derogation","score_opus":0.024449458281661247,"score_gpt":0.22417422081630653,"score_spread":0.19972476253464527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125703467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016797328,0.017461527,0.00045353803,0.024671257,0.0021955105,0.000028764134,0.0004918524,0.00009559585,0.9529223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00718586,0.002596303,0.00020959116,0.005128089,0.00011211461,0.000011292676,0.00010215787,0.000056389392,0.9845983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908125,0.00007347733,0.000014730839,0.00009254064,0.00043790773,0.00030007082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994392,0.00006369455,0.000016363387,0.000026727696,0.00032504438,0.00012907948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006310019,0.0006385314,0.00037467113,0.0015079905,0.0078001004,0.0069075497,0.00096633664,0.0032309913,0.07127136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011615321,0.00045668165,0.00040850844,0.0017339563,0.00550923,0.002773329,0.0018936358,0.0047446997,0.020732166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019681951,0.0000114581535,0.00033758502,0.00007119162,0.0000024848055,0.00009059726,0.0026265061,0.000056879042,0.00019866941,0.22496434,0.73561,0.036010616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014238386,0.0000017216164,0.00037876613,0.000057569065,9.0942837e-7,0.000020285202,0.00043669573,0.000009531433,0.000041315012,0.0020049752,0.9970427,0.000004139209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8650253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96147436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9746016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02539836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026584359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27153915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125706973","doi":"10.1515/9781773855196-009","title":"1.7 Thomas M.J. Bateman, “Liberal versus Post- Liberal Constitutionalism: Applying the Charter to Civil Society”","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Civil rights; Process (computing); Liberalism; Civil procedure","score_opus":0.04372854433866244,"score_gpt":0.2547056248620125,"score_spread":0.21097708052335004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125706973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015398948,0.07852915,0.0021566,0.11839782,0.0046514836,0.000060311857,0.000473701,0.00010051272,0.7940906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059337072,0.045244124,0.0022516584,0.04721856,0.0028393029,0.00016067195,0.0005216695,0.0002235245,0.84220344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696237,0.000858365,0.00008827341,0.0002685526,0.0014131997,0.00040913315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880457,0.0005150685,0.00008814796,0.00005512314,0.00045782683,0.00007933449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021774936,0.0009210909,0.00039039727,0.0014472124,0.0055501014,0.006098733,0.0013538767,0.0068709715,0.021909166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047246255,0.00048994564,0.00047359808,0.0022772374,0.007981804,0.005336879,0.0019133923,0.0062085222,0.009561074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010107376,0.000012404987,0.00014278223,0.00006571475,0.0000020765044,0.00005032373,0.00156211,0.00008015218,0.00007585601,0.5613382,0.4271963,0.009464034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000088002635,0.000007703255,0.0009450845,0.00033081972,0.0000038279186,0.00007558682,0.001016661,0.00010580573,0.00017196548,0.08246346,0.9148546,0.000015645313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20485249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31589177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20485249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010682136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011965635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40732026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7127612896","doi":"10.1353/book.142464","title":"Critical Conversations in Canadian Public Law","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.03979328767763925,"score_gpt":0.27062764749586227,"score_spread":0.23083435981822303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7127612896","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016245462,0.025598036,0.00055391825,0.114690766,0.0013569678,0.00006742149,0.00031310233,0.0000844976,0.84108984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5203523,0.013325762,0.0011180898,0.013060057,0.00042490065,0.00013872539,0.00017521647,0.00019459566,0.45121035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933241,0.0014582957,0.00012910465,0.00044900447,0.0019421029,0.0026974524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99207157,0.0032192918,0.00023166966,0.00030934587,0.0023834454,0.0017846465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051653124,0.0010235055,0.00083862647,0.0056629954,0.07132366,0.028030481,0.0034255923,0.008745479,0.03370548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015580692,0.00104766,0.00049310084,0.010212996,0.033083517,0.008428099,0.0055384254,0.009573422,0.001529505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022970176,0.00002206414,0.00035829653,0.000083592466,0.0000050576286,0.00017607003,0.0541727,0.00018437643,0.00005291282,0.711483,0.21662676,0.01681218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000126517625,0.0000066327834,0.0023473485,0.00044747305,0.000015024111,0.000064353306,0.07748981,0.00023930137,0.00011217145,0.0564235,0.8627792,0.00006250561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6991455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3008545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31646755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8109097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132565204","doi":"","title":"The sound symbolic lexis of Old English: Old English verbs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e_Buah","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Old English; Sound (geography); Field (mathematics); Thesaurus","score_opus":0.028673250757794234,"score_gpt":0.3049482452033586,"score_spread":0.27627499444556436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132565204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7412732,0.0056935637,0.02112676,0.0016442813,0.00012899865,0.000067140645,0.0011677872,0.00014754676,0.22875069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910591,0.0005414418,0.0025094016,0.00005301651,0.000032061085,0.00002140868,0.000328584,0.000041824078,0.0054131406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996536,0.00014260487,0.000037982023,0.000050101713,0.00007918693,0.000036608944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901295,0.0005680254,0.00012609402,0.000079645964,0.000163908,0.000049373757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047453097,0.00021764486,0.00017041524,0.0019384504,0.0008373185,0.0022654803,0.00022112313,0.0002977523,0.0034916939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018336324,0.00013899153,0.000078659905,0.002023089,0.0036180993,0.0028558471,0.0006435623,0.0005913997,0.00036022515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001453205,0.000031201693,0.01176976,0.0005097526,0.000012041995,0.0008608248,0.12280928,0.00019946137,0.009840242,0.7854676,0.004790695,0.06356386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007266474,0.00018695937,0.18443415,0.0010604179,0.000086007254,0.0043543065,0.1673941,0.0045232265,0.011703617,0.16941833,0.4566431,0.00012314133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009520058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01268051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009520058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020663254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006707244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018929303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132872496","doi":"","title":"Firearms control in Canada: Bill-C-68 and its amendments to the forfeiture of firearms and weapons provisions in the Criminal Code","year":2008,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Control (management); Criminal code; Code (set theory); Crime control; Legislation","score_opus":0.03736355973329726,"score_gpt":0.35712621043679343,"score_spread":0.3197626507034962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132872496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35585886,0.02754148,0.0009877022,0.11065834,0.00071049,0.000119430326,0.001097864,0.00004960488,0.5029762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9052226,0.0107160155,0.0008688598,0.010150442,0.00008852435,0.00002498054,0.00022803737,0.000022155647,0.0726785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974517,0.00015409838,0.00003813482,0.00015432574,0.0013456084,0.00085603964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980299,0.00040424656,0.00018653652,0.00003309054,0.0009895422,0.00035668103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013297779,0.00021260863,0.00016777893,0.0015906207,0.013854915,0.0059920168,0.0011551039,0.0024941748,0.0038194112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048336927,0.00028335906,0.00022909853,0.0036670694,0.0060161175,0.0014042016,0.00093587965,0.0024515046,0.00020121432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088220535,0.00010520322,0.03164923,0.00025926853,0.000019202977,0.00086903805,0.07202209,0.0012231908,0.00063905964,0.6731158,0.102656215,0.1173535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032794003,0.00008246228,0.1867611,0.0009589133,0.000054017248,0.00025498064,0.070748806,0.0011107926,0.0010647284,0.015343374,0.72342736,0.00016070274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99920267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16141157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16141157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24275026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97264373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132884982","doi":"","title":"Bertha Wilson: postmodern judge in a postmodern time","year":2000,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Postmodernism; Supreme court; Enlightenment; Charter; Neutrality; Constitutionalism; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.02155017402529486,"score_gpt":0.348343743005144,"score_spread":0.3267935689798491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132884982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05555316,0.02901181,0.0058916886,0.17190857,0.006037587,0.0000677059,0.00007565749,0.00014240839,0.73131144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8130715,0.005933605,0.0021082256,0.018772392,0.002163063,0.00009265432,0.000030955325,0.00012393708,0.15770371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99343467,0.0033925904,0.00009642867,0.00054198137,0.0017627218,0.0007715482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992623,0.004322651,0.0004092935,0.00041772847,0.0015607185,0.0006665753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005652699,0.0003735142,0.00028531847,0.001777788,0.019572489,0.011074567,0.0011279817,0.003400558,0.006268432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012836281,0.00024961968,0.00015392537,0.0016577307,0.032926876,0.007956724,0.0029510187,0.0043606614,0.0007540553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017110335,0.000013782908,0.00035186816,0.00003048037,0.0000017214127,0.00039128092,0.10552948,0.000015875397,0.00015800746,0.82537377,0.05582549,0.01229119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006748194,0.000021310183,0.00095249707,0.0002122169,0.000004473725,0.00033537747,0.0419613,0.00008494947,0.00025659468,0.073996715,0.88214374,0.000024097473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07472161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16080335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92527837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015010306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009845909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14857334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132901665","doi":"","title":"The end of law: Canada&apos;s national security legislation and the principle of shared humanity","year":2005,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Legislation; National security; Government (linguistics); Humanity; Dignity","score_opus":0.0425904170175612,"score_gpt":0.3868339187630873,"score_spread":0.3442435017455261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132901665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05610171,0.02089012,0.0007441573,0.35455316,0.0013562224,0.00007419347,0.0005825742,0.000034459466,0.56566346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58637047,0.013190132,0.0014007674,0.09849336,0.0003904588,0.00007099535,0.000350959,0.000056331828,0.29967648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637306,0.0005628296,0.000047975067,0.00030510096,0.0014969329,0.0012140946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99662954,0.0009751361,0.00017239139,0.00009340278,0.001268783,0.0008607519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023695247,0.00030713194,0.0002819467,0.0011862512,0.030564612,0.014302188,0.0015270428,0.0058339257,0.007674984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060066693,0.0002754117,0.00021542584,0.0022203338,0.017697114,0.0035033736,0.0020482917,0.00670682,0.00055549527],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002844927,0.000063011976,0.0039656465,0.00009950702,0.000008397679,0.00036329855,0.053362817,0.00015716178,0.00019584633,0.6714209,0.2437758,0.026559265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017267776,0.000027101614,0.019846035,0.0006782665,0.000018115208,0.00011261862,0.06902281,0.0002605789,0.00028234904,0.040183023,0.8694929,0.000059047423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98979247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10520979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10520979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1883258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76335406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132904707","doi":"","title":"Access to Justice in Ontario&apos;s Family Courts: The Parents&apos; Perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Economic Justice; Windsor; Permission; Legislation; Reproduction","score_opus":0.14312187593781545,"score_gpt":0.4547699732637587,"score_spread":0.31164809732594323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132904707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44058523,0.010278824,0.0003984341,0.22526829,0.00037266398,0.000049878006,0.0004943676,0.000015637053,0.32253668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741527,0.003656568,0.00007601931,0.0043499726,0.00006705035,0.000012168392,0.000031230473,0.0000070349793,0.017647289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976255,0.00051403965,0.000044588658,0.00011463886,0.00045451187,0.0012466928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99502146,0.0010622678,0.00042260607,0.00010413691,0.0010962602,0.0022933097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016293428,0.000116598356,0.00022223893,0.00087111915,0.022100786,0.006594216,0.0011409769,0.0029355644,0.01066567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058348025,0.00026619245,0.0001812293,0.0019088292,0.011066653,0.003271048,0.0029451472,0.0024206133,0.00023947032],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005577738,0.00009027524,0.042225778,0.0001852856,0.000024056562,0.0040124166,0.35558125,0.00027340173,0.00028731962,0.4906281,0.076503694,0.030132737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023407407,0.000050146977,0.09879455,0.0010622034,0.0000296656,0.000865176,0.5258999,0.00030835328,0.00015009262,0.026471645,0.34628224,0.000062597035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9748198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07185435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07185435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.104090266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5213423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132906993","doi":"","title":"Precedents in Canadian and American Constitutional Culture: A Comparative Essay","year":2016,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional economics; Constitutional law; Proportionality (law); Narrative; Politics; Constitutional interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional theory","score_opus":0.03493865116987113,"score_gpt":0.40514076393850973,"score_spread":0.37020211276863857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132906993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2882706,0.017298214,0.0008895667,0.03229242,0.00059223315,0.00003655973,0.00015550137,0.000028892098,0.6604361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98476875,0.0045818775,0.0002390539,0.0010000108,0.000064548214,0.000014707717,0.000040733157,0.000013496251,0.00927675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949038,0.0013314151,0.00008615775,0.0003546905,0.0016918668,0.001632121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925263,0.0030125277,0.00038515255,0.00022266635,0.002750466,0.0011029235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044375956,0.00035278386,0.0005003325,0.0044448585,0.045391783,0.014336107,0.0016654071,0.0020443597,0.005902588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00900874,0.00029111627,0.00023073761,0.009608145,0.04013669,0.0044595306,0.003601645,0.004294412,0.00018215476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030744388,0.000035560934,0.002241002,0.000085643056,0.000008842383,0.00022028557,0.40430975,0.00012595656,0.00018789232,0.56549966,0.007659685,0.019594988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017616685,0.000023805478,0.020217823,0.00048488646,0.000031396692,0.00016108339,0.52306604,0.00016136876,0.00017109259,0.023649788,0.43193877,0.000076333155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98048806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9878754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16052745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16052745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12045886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9736692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132917390","doi":"","title":"The principles of the rule of law and Charkaoui v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)","year":2007,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Supreme court; Rule of law; Government (linguistics); Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Flexibility (engineering); Transcendental number","score_opus":0.0288917985584744,"score_gpt":0.3386170164941599,"score_spread":0.30972521793568547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132917390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04481654,0.008056497,0.0031122654,0.08584649,0.0006618725,0.0001239413,0.00047416912,0.000048074107,0.85686016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8102073,0.0044281986,0.0023280808,0.023628937,0.0002363931,0.0001058215,0.00015888416,0.00003887413,0.15886742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955623,0.00047652342,0.00008446455,0.00035478553,0.0018945377,0.0016274246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828476,0.0005117701,0.00017592889,0.00005748948,0.0006528084,0.00031725477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002567256,0.00031837326,0.00029043652,0.0010965472,0.019282822,0.008730961,0.0012995389,0.004887237,0.0039169625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005573246,0.00035749102,0.00030482974,0.0017254297,0.019471847,0.0020396265,0.0019530328,0.0064046467,0.00040581686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042280994,0.0000072986213,0.0005943501,0.000013988297,0.000002509777,0.00009205936,0.0042699445,0.000115188275,0.00004605499,0.9763624,0.014435837,0.004056134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036988007,0.000024755253,0.012785518,0.00047088834,0.000033513537,0.00025746904,0.01405358,0.0007106216,0.00059663714,0.25052804,0.7203879,0.00011400097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98244375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98683804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062582426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062582426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14293444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45406938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132938458","doi":"","title":"Recognition of Indigenous Peoples&apos; Inherent Jurisdiction in the Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families: A Step Towards the Institutionalization of Canadian Pluralism","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Jurisdiction; Institutionalisation; Plural; Pluralism (philosophy); Legal pluralism; Common law; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.04778161257166952,"score_gpt":0.3363207976189116,"score_spread":0.2885391850472421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132938458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7394821,0.0018935659,0.001327173,0.03500353,0.00013713713,0.000087403336,0.000081768536,0.000019851022,0.2219674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99112564,0.0005001208,0.00066243426,0.0009383993,0.000013091061,0.000011765343,0.0000109339235,0.0000057178177,0.0067319283],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962547,0.00069474493,0.000075678945,0.0002351192,0.0011293808,0.0016104114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960581,0.0014085402,0.00041115656,0.00015902879,0.0010687726,0.0008944099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003857723,0.00017779446,0.00023934248,0.0011589162,0.024052344,0.007002317,0.0012357745,0.001338089,0.0019036615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052367817,0.00021267716,0.00019902081,0.0013397569,0.023801435,0.001883557,0.0038855453,0.0035479476,0.00007641233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012369455,0.000024568511,0.012131355,0.000058027985,0.0000058835512,0.0005654747,0.71017903,0.000115175615,0.00064884505,0.25643557,0.003929708,0.015893871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048205256,0.000025603682,0.045235816,0.00033575183,0.000022271313,0.0003998087,0.813845,0.00030554144,0.00069273653,0.012276363,0.12678751,0.00006879558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9818424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99257374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06600532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06600532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14570068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47890437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132970973","doi":"","title":"Deportation on national security grounds within a culture of legal justification","year":2004,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Principle of legality; Constitutionality; Charter; National security; Commission; Immigration; United Nations Charter","score_opus":0.03451260254406341,"score_gpt":0.39481616439540457,"score_spread":0.36030356185134116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132970973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3013194,0.0010554094,0.026135856,0.032266688,0.00024348294,0.00010998756,0.000025082923,0.000039693517,0.63880455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98417217,0.00020745718,0.0016856766,0.00092744804,0.000025721398,0.000020406183,0.0000051950747,0.000011396746,0.012944707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98505324,0.008193445,0.00043134074,0.0010342083,0.0033649479,0.0019227993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990516,0.004861591,0.0013840201,0.0012147325,0.0015365634,0.0004871051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011698891,0.00019295266,0.00045926037,0.0009920137,0.012788646,0.01221191,0.0014366624,0.0027439543,0.0029039972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017493797,0.00029730212,0.00031437352,0.0009515959,0.056085527,0.006848398,0.0079992395,0.005157333,0.00030495587],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030406302,0.00001124459,0.0006287446,0.000009483497,0.0000016384349,0.00009380608,0.052762505,0.00013577729,0.000151439,0.941008,0.0008560978,0.0043383846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018436638,0.00006975201,0.0040053553,0.0003984101,0.00002397378,0.00048515643,0.13197891,0.002004556,0.0014553625,0.6000879,0.25939447,0.00007779418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057469502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.079005614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057469502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0146181835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022635154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11426997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132979673","doi":"","title":"Rights, reason and respectthe separation of powers and the application of Section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2008,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legitimacy; Supreme court; Section (typography); Context (archaeology); Judicial review; Separation of powers; Bill of rights","score_opus":0.012196209042129877,"score_gpt":0.32191645872221286,"score_spread":0.309720249680083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132979673","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028339488,0.015846374,0.009918461,0.0964513,0.0014938962,0.00013483988,0.00035125922,0.00009190511,0.8473725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82876724,0.007467976,0.0064327894,0.017388072,0.0006868608,0.00009239007,0.00013725611,0.00009592381,0.13893148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98051274,0.0034649803,0.00042582792,0.001854543,0.009422302,0.0043196175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99220794,0.0031724798,0.00045626453,0.00066511665,0.0028725478,0.00062576897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012560145,0.0005576709,0.0006555832,0.002077228,0.015150566,0.016238132,0.001770063,0.004700261,0.006357073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0178498,0.0005298263,0.0005894953,0.0021824485,0.043322884,0.0053621284,0.0038798887,0.0067248936,0.0005510655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051843112,0.000001979078,0.0001532978,0.000016517588,0.0000016612935,0.00003094813,0.0014812477,0.000083980805,0.000050576265,0.9900041,0.0042332094,0.003937297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031038016,0.000030028446,0.0050737928,0.00040562128,0.00003236931,0.00011641594,0.0045392546,0.0007629463,0.000706228,0.4057438,0.58243936,0.00011904796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9195758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9464597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08042419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07432195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13270248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53924596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132984994","doi":"","title":"Thomas Jefferson&apos;s Essay on the Anglo-Saxon Language in context, a study of Jefferson&apos;s analytical method","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural language; Criticism; On Language","score_opus":0.08464660169661407,"score_gpt":0.46891198190551564,"score_spread":0.38426538020890155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132984994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026903858,0.1794523,0.012514417,0.2808631,0.009131953,0.0001215291,0.0005961677,0.00007971654,0.49033695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4550439,0.083245784,0.0071870144,0.045209035,0.0047725355,0.00018828531,0.00025207206,0.0003886886,0.40371272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817014,0.0010012623,0.00007136579,0.0001925326,0.00041708184,0.00014754076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964228,0.002707513,0.00014425981,0.000083956984,0.0004392194,0.00020226484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025825312,0.0003989641,0.00036699377,0.0018870608,0.0109478915,0.006619358,0.00080862164,0.0029253769,0.004645284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076225693,0.0004397616,0.00022796221,0.0029110294,0.012652172,0.004601196,0.0014210605,0.0035903377,0.0007623753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019731855,0.000023546942,0.00063643866,0.00020442891,0.0000150551305,0.00021408036,0.08472843,0.0000652414,0.00021976262,0.5050156,0.38523793,0.02361974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050493486,0.000009201175,0.00276705,0.00055566686,0.000013970234,0.0001826773,0.033395942,0.00006911459,0.00028463273,0.025416112,0.93728477,0.000015754127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18418573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35808757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18418573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010874468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007874166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36622733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132986439","doi":"","title":"Human rights protection in Canada: A unique, multi-dimensional approach","year":2007,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Legislation; Jurisdiction; State (computer science); Fundamental rights; Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.048754202540806854,"score_gpt":0.373166149309887,"score_spread":0.32441194676908014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132986439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070464656,0.022940235,0.015192202,0.11157454,0.00050141703,0.00016417798,0.00058605714,0.00007135155,0.7785054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93704945,0.011815582,0.010106027,0.006689768,0.00013599884,0.000089424866,0.00015749894,0.000036425507,0.0339199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99198455,0.001506929,0.00015049694,0.0005941143,0.003327612,0.0024362027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963331,0.00088537164,0.00021662355,0.00020046464,0.0015435503,0.0008207927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031209562,0.0005348282,0.00063961925,0.005336043,0.026665265,0.017950576,0.0017756053,0.0029011653,0.0029324384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003995647,0.00041790516,0.00062486023,0.0091175735,0.028873995,0.0035476277,0.0059694466,0.004548922,0.00016317412],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005479472,0.000010557678,0.002470483,0.000054000255,0.000010714543,0.00016948392,0.012961045,0.001007418,0.00010324698,0.9591738,0.008215789,0.01581809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016536578,0.00001953859,0.020935394,0.001162129,0.000070539085,0.00035220297,0.073689185,0.0044188835,0.00034656405,0.36237445,0.53644174,0.00017287952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9903481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99495935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23583764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23583764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30090913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132995586","doi":"","title":"The Principles of Fundamental Justice and the &quot;Societal Consensus&quot; Requirement","year":2016,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Norm (philosophy); Supreme court; Economic Justice; Competence (human resources); State (computer science)","score_opus":0.060126345755816914,"score_gpt":0.3931326312161623,"score_spread":0.3330062854603454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132995586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012289185,0.002009762,0.08174539,0.1951008,0.0017702596,0.00042722432,0.00045358675,0.00013775931,0.7060661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7505993,0.0013456129,0.10331098,0.05855563,0.0013399406,0.0018232185,0.0003560514,0.00021154014,0.08245776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9465157,0.017943785,0.0033651765,0.005355203,0.019991914,0.0068282154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9683796,0.0133457035,0.0024668407,0.004508073,0.009221718,0.0020780202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04284066,0.00068974594,0.0016380403,0.0016796867,0.01576671,0.017005967,0.004579954,0.017599978,0.0063501224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04969748,0.0010328507,0.0014853403,0.002003174,0.075651415,0.008921809,0.007070022,0.018604068,0.0020476982],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021558976,0.000002735392,0.000030313062,0.000009590411,0.0000019553834,0.000014231924,0.00049414736,0.000079595346,0.0000224268,0.9963815,0.0020537956,0.00090752577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018082394,0.000008514964,0.00024361211,0.00007810094,0.000005576708,0.000030428391,0.00044030536,0.00036261164,0.00014478013,0.9454119,0.053227417,0.000028610519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14218262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1383309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14218262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026743295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07262678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28271008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133007193","doi":"","title":"Aquitted with an Asterisk: Implementing the &quot;New Double Jeopardy&quot; Exception into Canadian Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Double jeopardy; Commonwealth; Government (linguistics); Criminal justice; State (computer science); Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.047165954359297255,"score_gpt":0.3889701871818563,"score_spread":0.341804232822559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133007193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06736796,0.007850348,0.0043037287,0.22219023,0.0060593123,0.00038915392,0.0011651498,0.00035040706,0.69032365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41170213,0.009118604,0.009870812,0.03597185,0.0005335807,0.00009631673,0.0004772512,0.0001929844,0.5320364],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690384,0.0002644265,0.00009979919,0.00030146947,0.0016074517,0.0008230333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957014,0.000495454,0.00014216127,0.00023401623,0.002633229,0.00079372374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002410105,0.00026756673,0.00020575988,0.00097459846,0.017642679,0.0075558606,0.0011497014,0.0027373026,0.016309224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071034944,0.0001909839,0.00024818844,0.0011929099,0.0065305782,0.0020888427,0.0018809921,0.0031380593,0.0013266166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004882629,0.00006434789,0.008629648,0.00018678841,0.000009056113,0.00057635194,0.02905174,0.00044056555,0.0011871353,0.30383167,0.5443955,0.11157836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076099655,0.00001882016,0.010491682,0.00018692203,0.000010280996,0.00010982157,0.010181658,0.00029046516,0.0006134425,0.0038950562,0.9741399,0.000054329495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98660743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048988782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048988782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13566372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35544014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133026633","doi":"","title":"Canada&apos;s Charter of Rights: Paradigm Lost?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Deference; Legislature; Politics; State (computer science); Judicial review; Scrutiny; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.05338266488725851,"score_gpt":0.3389596590394113,"score_spread":0.28557699415215276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133026633","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024097522,0.27881885,0.0027459348,0.5213506,0.010434605,0.000072791874,0.00074060314,0.00010620782,0.18332061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26486856,0.33960465,0.009947796,0.13778292,0.007703812,0.00018436549,0.00050665956,0.00022232384,0.23917902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929677,0.0010824736,0.00017534148,0.000700182,0.0042952094,0.0007791762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99356115,0.001542758,0.00028571268,0.00052654697,0.0032313007,0.0008525372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051736915,0.00034487704,0.000627418,0.0027340935,0.0054813223,0.010454914,0.0017389049,0.00391756,0.0055532074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012075672,0.00030475736,0.00032724842,0.00473478,0.017154006,0.00366421,0.0011325415,0.004086849,0.0007483502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009444952,0.0000072262424,0.000197501,0.00025103398,0.000008638409,0.000075908574,0.00068046566,0.00020059494,0.00010027513,0.58605164,0.36251384,0.04990355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004389382,0.0000028511308,0.0006349802,0.00037316512,0.0000042323486,0.000030839852,0.00034289225,0.00009311489,0.000045945988,0.025263947,0.9731899,0.00001378193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9334444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95686305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07265489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07265489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1897162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5271506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133028872","doi":"","title":"Democracy in moments of fear: examining law, criminality, terror and other anxieties","year":2006,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Democracy; State (computer science); Civil liberties; State of emergency; Government (linguistics); National security; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.0689673521266243,"score_gpt":0.39930220867616883,"score_spread":0.33033485654954453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133028872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9681323,0.0008251559,0.00036203806,0.0025028333,0.000035404613,0.00001962832,0.0000166715,0.0000059079252,0.028100112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979144,0.00055284216,0.00011359243,0.00040634774,0.000018153465,0.000019896424,0.000009570985,0.0000043669525,0.0009608606],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766624,0.001210098,0.000051504354,0.00011142301,0.0004198901,0.00054077577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99499005,0.0027666537,0.0010835213,0.00013123224,0.00036621842,0.00066221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029811065,0.00035378008,0.00043028835,0.0021744075,0.00670179,0.007961464,0.0008208077,0.0017492899,0.0020114866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065740705,0.00032495466,0.0005388568,0.0013023459,0.016210375,0.005822736,0.0069072754,0.0038788365,0.000213962],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005057013,0.00015473927,0.026570618,0.00009871931,0.0000139890435,0.0007255012,0.9472222,0.00007625004,0.00056613097,0.014664162,0.00082079275,0.009036404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029105324,0.00003198243,0.020115279,0.00006227142,0.0000056635145,0.00023947074,0.9727324,0.00006135642,0.00009147233,0.0023327502,0.0043126633,0.000011732456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008720267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016167384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008720267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050106077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031774035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03635466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133033861","doi":"","title":"Reconciliation and Third-Party Interests: Tsilhqot&apos;in Nation v. British Columbia","year":2010,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); White paper; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.04722458908151616,"score_gpt":0.35864177628788285,"score_spread":0.3114171872063667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133033861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45009294,0.0028144787,0.00050175516,0.06363082,0.00023108124,0.00008666922,0.0001413119,0.00002279434,0.48247808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96095955,0.00056414923,0.000095605974,0.006506246,0.00002295432,0.000040787174,0.000027665757,0.000015837823,0.03176725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927738,0.0021500539,0.00014333862,0.0002854552,0.0011950071,0.003452421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99390715,0.0028954868,0.00036167135,0.00025307407,0.0012491717,0.0013334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057257195,0.00019400012,0.0004716752,0.0012165972,0.03259894,0.00930602,0.0022194383,0.0063704695,0.0078042573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017042577,0.00033773607,0.0002670448,0.0021932726,0.009032525,0.003572038,0.005976212,0.009341842,0.00034994297],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018821117,0.00015545105,0.033765987,0.00010490165,0.000040233528,0.003984267,0.21501589,0.000517148,0.000354888,0.60475385,0.09544652,0.045672625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012104702,0.000071051036,0.074719444,0.0009026818,0.00022904584,0.00093550875,0.5347209,0.0020352388,0.0012324925,0.08814139,0.29668158,0.00020965123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9192332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97596234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0807668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04755409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06227142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34503067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133047736","doi":"","title":"Equality at a crossroads :brethinking equality in family law","year":2005,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada; Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Legalization; Institution; Gender equality; Racial equality; Family life; Law reform","score_opus":0.09081241641320743,"score_gpt":0.44606186888462296,"score_spread":0.35524945247141554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133047736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13180476,0.03968309,0.016375275,0.24155818,0.0022922822,0.000069437454,0.000024419836,0.000037159854,0.56815535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9590887,0.008462954,0.0015594014,0.008644199,0.00079164846,0.000060164362,0.000012499206,0.00004249651,0.021337885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99450904,0.0039442955,0.000073620504,0.0002556163,0.00047928243,0.00073807687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899593,0.007940149,0.0004902642,0.00033469484,0.0006665132,0.0006091767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065074195,0.00026040606,0.00040259288,0.0022826814,0.012544554,0.01138391,0.0010745503,0.003658461,0.0044735796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013241737,0.00022263723,0.00028478092,0.002075496,0.03740283,0.016176289,0.0076527367,0.0067556878,0.00029693698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008829712,0.000026765047,0.000751501,0.000026652566,0.0000037673685,0.00013808318,0.07924016,0.000073127376,0.000044942357,0.9012253,0.00456918,0.013891677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010788643,0.000038192673,0.0035146766,0.00058737816,0.000009872318,0.00018274235,0.1592893,0.00033511216,0.00025329075,0.6784114,0.15734875,0.000018503782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069451956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008375181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012544554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005674429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040639495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041171014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133064229","doi":"","title":"Reframing dialogues: toward a multidimensional approach to Charter dialogue","year":2004,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Dialogic; Legislature; Cognitive reframing; Scholarship; Meaning (existential); Normative","score_opus":0.05487163094413703,"score_gpt":0.35504539941798396,"score_spread":0.3001737684738469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133064229","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06769852,0.0067632063,0.5147275,0.05188461,0.0007133376,0.001178883,0.00032563682,0.00075100485,0.35595736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.830798,0.0026326603,0.14875351,0.0020287174,0.0002328937,0.00094527897,0.00024560784,0.00026763955,0.014095702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9539841,0.03669683,0.0010083822,0.0021803584,0.004278957,0.0018513764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97363836,0.01790352,0.0020044753,0.0019082471,0.0027836403,0.0017617453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031663008,0.0014186841,0.0010395071,0.009077018,0.019105842,0.03071885,0.005375563,0.005565315,0.004871507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028009158,0.000978763,0.0012479329,0.0065574027,0.071233585,0.03524408,0.019786749,0.008795739,0.00051359675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011787191,0.000013615555,0.00041453718,0.00007644816,0.0000059872777,0.00017582816,0.31054273,0.0004990069,0.00024475943,0.6776971,0.0013097731,0.009008406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022995744,0.000026217122,0.00086325384,0.0005035963,0.00002172162,0.0002888504,0.2957728,0.0054953895,0.0004978881,0.50550455,0.1909186,0.000084199695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08105796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.070533134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08105796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031048672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024740769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22527492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133065537","doi":"","title":"The doctrine of political purposes in charity law: its troubled history and problematic rationales","year":2004,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Agency (philosophy); Statement (logic); Position (finance); Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.04858259797176499,"score_gpt":0.3676442681538776,"score_spread":0.31906167018211257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133065537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051935624,0.049163356,0.021180043,0.29317197,0.001442567,0.000055692366,0.00008404766,0.00006320578,0.5829035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95435363,0.013714246,0.0039617256,0.013045206,0.0016753026,0.00009384578,0.000029502948,0.00007410868,0.013052436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844833,0.009944012,0.00040490724,0.00086813327,0.0030932762,0.0012063974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97419196,0.021260161,0.0009360329,0.0010605793,0.00180332,0.0007480113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01862948,0.00028703955,0.00073054514,0.004166276,0.015295828,0.019563451,0.0024560997,0.008478787,0.0019988175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022762923,0.00062703685,0.0004164655,0.0060730274,0.11984534,0.011349755,0.0062401975,0.01759316,0.00037241558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.756153e-7,0.0000024740286,0.000038681315,0.0000067234396,3.6373407e-7,0.000014504941,0.0019939472,0.000023220115,0.0000059822496,0.99610573,0.0006313591,0.0011761923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008750127,0.000007815577,0.0006271797,0.0003398713,0.0000042080414,0.0001080866,0.006356733,0.00046701182,0.00012185439,0.8857534,0.10618035,0.000024723402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043833587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051273983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043833587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021661764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015226012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15716785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133072881","doi":"","title":"Honest counsel: Institutional dialogue and the Canadian rule of law","year":2007,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Democracy; Charter; Legislature; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Rule of law; Politics","score_opus":0.03021150804244396,"score_gpt":0.3614680968481793,"score_spread":0.3312565888057354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133072881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07786645,0.00424635,0.005784601,0.09780732,0.0005180498,0.0001370311,0.00022043988,0.0001230083,0.8132968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9387251,0.0016717952,0.00276626,0.006136429,0.00009296306,0.00003603238,0.00007775018,0.000042145322,0.050451502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870467,0.0019003778,0.00025385848,0.0014518996,0.0056232065,0.0037239753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99229604,0.002287737,0.00047810416,0.00046696476,0.002997123,0.0014739826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006361566,0.00032977117,0.00044742695,0.0028078265,0.03517354,0.016415877,0.0027619202,0.0046406714,0.008031596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018488603,0.00047499416,0.00042259364,0.0032023492,0.029507618,0.0047070878,0.006736421,0.0071971333,0.0004470322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010499136,0.000008701067,0.00093530485,0.000022155646,0.000003972936,0.00010885244,0.009771261,0.00025657323,0.000067014866,0.9714603,0.007844921,0.00951046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073059644,0.000029363104,0.01246653,0.00035876315,0.000059297512,0.00022786667,0.03585169,0.003256456,0.00053963694,0.32256198,0.6243655,0.00020974671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98363715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98868084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17161757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17161757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23892772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9608062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133090787","doi":"","title":"Deconstructing and Reconstructing Constitutional Rights: Jacques Derrida’s General Strategy of Deconstruction and the Constitutional Rights of Canada’s Indigenous Peoples","year":2022,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Oxford; National Archives and Records Administration","keywords":"Deconstruction (building); Interpretation (philosophy); Oppression; Ideology; Injustice; Economic Justice; Indigenous; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.016832773997456453,"score_gpt":0.31217256150544576,"score_spread":0.2953397875079893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133090787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11162692,0.035127938,0.008922712,0.22033486,0.0009415701,0.00010548267,0.00017462083,0.00011878921,0.6226471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9190901,0.007945251,0.0034149392,0.009011885,0.00025968673,0.00004809103,0.00004890401,0.00009094118,0.060090233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950488,0.0014128763,0.000067074565,0.0005143872,0.0013633331,0.001593539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747,0.0008183192,0.000112480804,0.00023461688,0.0008292435,0.0005353641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005218041,0.000653705,0.0005977961,0.0023398306,0.031990457,0.015355568,0.0024658204,0.003916689,0.0024407231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004437412,0.00030843154,0.00042242935,0.0021252027,0.103410035,0.005988891,0.005165797,0.007162782,0.00026587618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000843155,0.000008921293,0.00046961123,0.000024103925,0.0000054945517,0.00012874817,0.059613615,0.00026783772,0.00010410537,0.9249238,0.008123678,0.006321592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017154525,0.000013551904,0.002710372,0.0004113009,0.000020238162,0.00020932019,0.08946203,0.0008673409,0.000534073,0.3889205,0.51673067,0.00010354307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9678563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97254914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13043626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13043626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10832134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9463857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133116520","doi":"","title":"Asleep on the sofa: elaboratist tendencies of the Supreme Court of Canada in its Charter jurisprudence","year":2004,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Legislation; Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.02239693570282976,"score_gpt":0.32251798468355836,"score_spread":0.3001210489807286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133116520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53214103,0.0013145454,0.007099815,0.039237503,0.00022428854,0.00009663361,0.00022427281,0.000083218816,0.4195787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838058,0.00021564247,0.0010674307,0.0015415358,0.000018374465,0.000011909742,0.000030594118,0.00004104449,0.013267616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960407,0.0010941232,0.00007864915,0.00040186086,0.0014614001,0.0009232823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950742,0.0019194615,0.0003798646,0.00027446903,0.0018279736,0.0005241094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044431817,0.00024882582,0.000267415,0.0015502069,0.029041748,0.012429063,0.0010883118,0.0021365017,0.0032142727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014519196,0.00025918594,0.00024458516,0.0025249994,0.035236545,0.0032326826,0.0038744265,0.005935116,0.00024172157],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025302666,0.000011000201,0.0026512418,0.00001866912,0.000006100363,0.00023644416,0.29186103,0.0003338645,0.00040886083,0.68612736,0.008981597,0.009338563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028436383,0.00002697952,0.019588722,0.0002770906,0.00004153437,0.00016542633,0.43960765,0.0018104921,0.0011759703,0.19712487,0.34000516,0.0001477558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93227327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96207476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06772673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046223298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06761691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33537507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133847048","doi":"10.1080/13880292.2026.2630504","title":"At Risk or in Jeopardy? Canadian Common Law Species at Risk Jurisprudence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Common law; Risk assessment; Environmental law","score_opus":0.02203624243703392,"score_gpt":0.34798976214368427,"score_spread":0.3259535197066503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133847048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4984221,0.01849693,0.0016575949,0.23147486,0.0005762252,0.00015748314,0.00081427605,0.000072742594,0.24832788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.965287,0.006167193,0.0008750523,0.014909713,0.00006345314,0.000022966218,0.00017969194,0.00002359715,0.012471274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98963064,0.0007789809,0.00025217363,0.0010064436,0.004984477,0.0033471887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748915,0.006887932,0.002693339,0.00048541004,0.010639053,0.004402783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075444914,0.00023202687,0.000377284,0.0037305702,0.02184717,0.010215016,0.002541012,0.0028452303,0.0063501825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031591147,0.00033647867,0.00042506246,0.0048509333,0.011009842,0.003485436,0.0033246516,0.0052864114,0.00030170687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009743573,0.00015891006,0.19770955,0.00063819194,0.000085872656,0.0028659962,0.1515578,0.0007157236,0.0014010915,0.3160987,0.15958354,0.16908725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026373238,0.000059154234,0.2682782,0.0015802829,0.00015256288,0.0010069353,0.2222961,0.0013288466,0.0010793812,0.019831296,0.48416075,0.00020003719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98761183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99522805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87398785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12601215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19517246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9142864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7134742971","doi":"","title":"Oldest Profession or Oldest Oppression?: Addressing Prostitution after the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in &lt;i&gt;Canada v. Bedford&lt;/i&gt;","year":2014,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legislation; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.02073868273726672,"score_gpt":0.2778134712254934,"score_spread":0.2570747884882267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7134742971","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1342374,0.017200898,0.00042421275,0.7657354,0.0023323293,0.00008322178,0.00018909774,0.000019956584,0.07977749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62557894,0.009021218,0.0005358749,0.3264027,0.0008863347,0.00007717231,0.000088951696,0.00003843314,0.037370447],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949191,0.00066293805,0.00007628577,0.00020064248,0.00087286544,0.0032681096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951201,0.0009650531,0.00019691484,0.00006863306,0.0009836423,0.002665616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003968351,0.00032752432,0.00041289785,0.00082224567,0.03540197,0.0068325596,0.0025303168,0.010674963,0.004505812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010489493,0.00032621613,0.0004721475,0.0012515384,0.009080617,0.0036140897,0.0061909067,0.015122942,0.00027519357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108165834,0.00040022715,0.038717672,0.00030028677,0.00005929667,0.0033645746,0.16320337,0.0006744227,0.0009384379,0.26978347,0.3848032,0.13764702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008435966,0.00014510244,0.07064802,0.0027437801,0.00018856161,0.0009047255,0.34115356,0.00066524034,0.0010146631,0.028633893,0.5535994,0.00021859829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96232265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9925916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06171984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06171984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2625262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44781083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139460115","doi":"","title":"State and society : Canadian social, political and legal thought","year":2012,"lang":"pl","type":"book","venue":"Jagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Legislation","score_opus":0.015535059980704967,"score_gpt":0.21772315166672093,"score_spread":0.20218809168601595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139460115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010932784,0.030694399,0.00073391845,0.061315306,0.0010716646,0.00002403481,0.00016571702,0.00003299968,0.8950292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5756261,0.030894699,0.0014045872,0.007292183,0.0007375794,0.00007213952,0.00018310407,0.0001250797,0.3836646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754566,0.0003025922,0.000039241506,0.00022584725,0.0008934298,0.0009931624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885833,0.00032557565,0.000041141488,0.00006363652,0.00044734988,0.00026391604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018713358,0.0008114537,0.00066232425,0.0043709436,0.02652853,0.017691975,0.0020383922,0.004927392,0.020067366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003752448,0.00062987354,0.00051818317,0.009566697,0.030539779,0.0052974657,0.0031291784,0.0061469856,0.0008688888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005085233,0.000005193093,0.00011494278,0.00002477219,0.0000020351633,0.000028496386,0.005888385,0.00011501119,0.000014968471,0.95815086,0.028906673,0.0067437147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012360953,0.0000047942535,0.0020552443,0.0002538499,0.000012354259,0.00004526164,0.015022989,0.0003779493,0.000052691776,0.20748246,0.77464396,0.000036099806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9857576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99115974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20128982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20128982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17705356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9263906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139602313","doi":"","title":"Know Your Rights","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Disadvantaged; Viewpoints; Economic Justice; Human rights; Fundamental rights","score_opus":0.03589935556723269,"score_gpt":0.281835869759516,"score_spread":0.24593651419228332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139602313","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008359274,0.004418917,0.0010695237,0.119932555,0.010937654,0.000095703996,0.0017105537,0.00039754855,0.8606017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019318476,0.007250077,0.0010828327,0.067562476,0.0042004334,0.00013570742,0.0020178917,0.0003703355,0.8980619],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940578,0.0010649522,0.0002330167,0.0007349814,0.0026632783,0.0012459843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878191,0.0018836429,0.0006487684,0.0018383524,0.004634899,0.003175304],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036803896,0.00075001875,0.0009035738,0.0014521913,0.006276838,0.01230822,0.0019854694,0.007852842,0.46383828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030094225,0.00033994982,0.00073283084,0.0015302708,0.003937958,0.011903906,0.005078695,0.0059126043,0.288063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001385816,0.000021899637,0.00042029386,0.0000808134,0.000004941807,0.00012321596,0.00049150945,0.000020769941,0.00007067146,0.017500691,0.90766823,0.073583215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002982656,0.0000045387865,0.00019731176,0.00012215455,0.0000021153264,0.000093486735,0.00037121453,0.000010682462,0.000030346793,0.0035013626,0.99565685,0.0000068629843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021466173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031393267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46383828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003566003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011519774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7647696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7144930701","doi":"","title":"Principles of Fundamental Justice under Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2016,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Economic Justice; Fundamental rights; Human rights","score_opus":0.03582596644106721,"score_gpt":0.27963496128792414,"score_spread":0.24380899484685692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7144930701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041362867,0.004059565,0.013614041,0.05507542,0.003000212,0.0011064785,0.0011964514,0.0002534974,0.91755813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31820253,0.0071160193,0.10303712,0.14069647,0.0036357203,0.0037888521,0.0015603416,0.00055739516,0.4214056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9383326,0.010311199,0.0037719638,0.0058883876,0.028155297,0.013540547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.968016,0.009802049,0.0013988015,0.002875956,0.014946084,0.002961093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030811783,0.0020106311,0.0028299517,0.00441786,0.03402685,0.02304936,0.0059387833,0.029802255,0.011489559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043948017,0.0028452927,0.0044764183,0.0042743185,0.049325302,0.007873294,0.0065047075,0.04064725,0.0033238225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065626755,0.00001979031,0.00010403346,0.0000333276,0.000008990806,0.000032100794,0.0013349177,0.00025020604,0.000048828373,0.96909505,0.026976485,0.0020896988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008350678,0.000033705437,0.0022163757,0.0007999585,0.000056473233,0.00013133,0.0020810124,0.0008205002,0.00033308202,0.5242633,0.46877897,0.00040190964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9037104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91746086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096289575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09306119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3235561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6752093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7145152657","doi":"","title":"Intervention in Rules on Membership of Religious Communities: A Study Based on Canadian Constitution","year":2018,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Intervention (counseling); Subject (documents); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.04778148550437019,"score_gpt":0.32782801464846223,"score_spread":0.28004652914409206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7145152657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935913,0.0001398498,0.000050267678,0.0007360457,0.000015201016,0.00011774894,0.000081975995,0.000002676537,0.005264969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964483,0.00014074851,0.000094835326,0.0004064504,0.00000502826,0.000048952286,0.00006709163,0.0000046543205,0.002784022],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919258,0.0017036085,0.00018036137,0.0007079734,0.0016754828,0.0038069405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98292416,0.0052569876,0.0027251753,0.0008628389,0.0032091863,0.0050216257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057577044,0.0002837689,0.0006365536,0.00197336,0.017312324,0.003914383,0.0026797748,0.0017436118,0.0048612985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022516295,0.0006216366,0.0005403251,0.0033027786,0.005584404,0.0015837159,0.0031506137,0.0033207294,0.0002306384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082343974,0.0048460206,0.72265095,0.00011768213,0.00009619712,0.0012528505,0.2073369,0.00018844867,0.00081369735,0.011728298,0.0065470613,0.043598406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012270424,0.0003407453,0.7815625,0.00017463621,0.000093444556,0.00013561036,0.20361634,0.0003319029,0.00027148068,0.00069321645,0.012592107,0.000065274704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97822464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9912409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06540218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06540218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13441506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47452825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7145193610","doi":"","title":"The Significance and Possibility of Constitutional Law with Multicultural Clause : Multiculturalism in Canada from the Perspective of Human Rights Theory and Cases","year":2011,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Human rights; Perspective (graphical); Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; International human rights law","score_opus":0.03118598189484609,"score_gpt":0.28037132783918495,"score_spread":0.24918534594433886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7145193610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5380809,0.0029488304,0.0062985932,0.06305388,0.00015837501,0.000115169845,0.00039876843,0.00005231936,0.3888932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931322,0.0002962768,0.0007025403,0.0007645237,0.000017292246,0.000013932049,0.00002411461,0.000009500905,0.005039641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990044,0.0023639486,0.0002505204,0.00094669015,0.0025241687,0.0038706746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800013,0.0118399905,0.0011123602,0.0012135775,0.0038720763,0.001960664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074388543,0.00030685918,0.0007164171,0.0033315544,0.030106977,0.020261196,0.0036518343,0.004740619,0.009016222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028735777,0.0005600434,0.00065864844,0.005619786,0.03499912,0.009081668,0.006614281,0.005530707,0.00016111047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018497969,0.000017567221,0.0053094802,0.000025607418,0.000010433676,0.00035980018,0.010771825,0.00039095405,0.00006650393,0.97564757,0.00269814,0.004683585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009769264,0.000042369164,0.033387695,0.00052252144,0.00024544215,0.0006745715,0.15292515,0.009799604,0.001087488,0.67313015,0.12783699,0.0002502933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9819177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9866441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09597654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09597654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15838592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6963618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7145531593","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review over Welfare and Health Claims under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (2)","year":2008,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Judicial review; Welfare rights; Welfare; Health claims on food labels","score_opus":0.046128172409596276,"score_gpt":0.3155112033623595,"score_spread":0.2693830309527632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7145531593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09311263,0.011632824,0.013745477,0.18116051,0.0073909885,0.0043696584,0.03215301,0.0011117255,0.65532327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5654516,0.009953855,0.022371892,0.1037977,0.0047213673,0.0015307291,0.0150281675,0.0006137283,0.27653095],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9020573,0.009047589,0.006315585,0.004927106,0.061701488,0.015950898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77389294,0.091152065,0.006240438,0.011129102,0.11131337,0.0062720366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.078985214,0.00082971214,0.0016151182,0.019826505,0.020933649,0.017402666,0.0096453605,0.01369727,0.009002488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17769735,0.0017297363,0.0014237108,0.013727872,0.00828038,0.0044550425,0.0049060946,0.010693213,0.0016937034],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022944939,0.00011838694,0.009401729,0.0005210213,0.00012830844,0.00081710133,0.005457792,0.0007156822,0.0012180163,0.2426167,0.6939913,0.044784553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023587351,0.000074875745,0.03971484,0.0017634204,0.00050224754,0.0003267564,0.0043714102,0.0034407715,0.0034050778,0.026395516,0.91936064,0.00040857831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93982476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95758057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078985214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07753672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33877018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5625709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7145812119","doi":"","title":"Multiculturalism : A Research from a Constitutional Viewpoint - With the Canadian Constitutional Law as an Instance","year":2005,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Constitutional law; Constitutional court; Constitution; Constitutional economics; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.06572324999421653,"score_gpt":0.35509031935439045,"score_spread":0.2893670693601739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7145812119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53391695,0.0063503077,0.0038554636,0.032960307,0.00017325621,0.00016521,0.00040998988,0.000037996448,0.42213058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914232,0.0012816007,0.0008359187,0.0010918822,0.000025878431,0.000041854684,0.00006862136,0.000022766591,0.0052083516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856066,0.004367548,0.00031824564,0.0012983135,0.0056512025,0.0027580124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96504784,0.015660424,0.0024333696,0.002300307,0.009942692,0.004615338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013450049,0.00034440917,0.0006439363,0.00972397,0.033182416,0.019134989,0.0032241128,0.0014096401,0.008414235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036416087,0.00040715703,0.00055127405,0.020402126,0.030504007,0.013427719,0.009084097,0.0034427864,0.0002002119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054200762,0.00012435166,0.045301728,0.00017798731,0.000047547477,0.00029796778,0.18566653,0.0003197165,0.00032640607,0.70241016,0.006387169,0.05888613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023668697,0.00005408779,0.11538897,0.0007252477,0.00009310695,0.00028483281,0.6987663,0.0008220716,0.0008799256,0.069908515,0.1129696,0.00008376306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9419249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96617025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09863613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09863613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.123447515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71565855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7146066015","doi":"","title":"Judicial Reviewover Welfare and Health Care Claims under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1)","year":2006,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Welfare rights; Health care; Welfare; Legislation; Health insurance","score_opus":0.023702782040211635,"score_gpt":0.29545784144136467,"score_spread":0.271755059401153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7146066015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11824487,0.013476316,0.011130094,0.13943934,0.0037555501,0.0036055325,0.044396624,0.0011861697,0.6647655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6446831,0.0102843065,0.023116695,0.047018036,0.003151973,0.0010891702,0.023714993,0.0005013129,0.24644037],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9181958,0.0071798335,0.0043682205,0.0031799776,0.054450203,0.01262607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8389594,0.049174055,0.0076158256,0.009940647,0.08848678,0.005823295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04770535,0.0007441336,0.0013396995,0.018407267,0.020834615,0.01595886,0.008523262,0.008013166,0.010497934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13876766,0.0012527037,0.0010361164,0.014942235,0.0062107206,0.0042965394,0.005304297,0.00582113,0.0016102752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021920593,0.0001528156,0.019058583,0.00046491218,0.00011497039,0.0007218897,0.0040878067,0.0008391027,0.0009029919,0.20471139,0.7045361,0.064190336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001798175,0.00006947992,0.0793027,0.0012844333,0.00038707463,0.00039509882,0.003949127,0.0045604366,0.00334238,0.02504559,0.88109726,0.0003866002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96225655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97964215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08436259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08436259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34402618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6120963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7146329243","doi":"","title":"<Notes> Notwithstanding Mechanism of Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2017,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Charter; Human rights; Legislation; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.04256486244438454,"score_gpt":0.2951868055910083,"score_spread":0.2526219431466238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7146329243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048748567,0.00034727028,0.0034864692,0.049049478,0.004617121,0.0006736294,0.052616935,0.0026219736,0.88171226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041443426,0.00055786857,0.007974118,0.02005557,0.0008872746,0.00050143816,0.017331544,0.0010511932,0.9101976],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99427706,0.00030532098,0.00028182584,0.00044699787,0.003355683,0.0013330863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778676,0.0042135683,0.0005322131,0.0017283446,0.014553233,0.0011049855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026193697,0.00044982843,0.0006171297,0.004337573,0.0117955385,0.0107784495,0.002838485,0.004320231,0.14447948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021157095,0.0007127818,0.0005812365,0.008916384,0.0029159344,0.0045362995,0.001849437,0.0047167973,0.028466808],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015536767,0.000008426451,0.00045999716,0.00002526698,0.000002311615,0.000033903656,0.0003822318,0.000044128006,0.00009104101,0.03906791,0.9544422,0.0054270197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011220153,0.0000032280557,0.0044650077,0.000045403543,0.0000053770896,0.000030488633,0.0005250529,0.000130508,0.0003115531,0.0019409423,0.9925005,0.000030662773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9594194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.973307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14447948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032589264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08319626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48333204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7146357267","doi":"","title":"Religious Freedom of Hutterite in Canada ： Religious Institutionalism and Legal Pluralism","year":2021,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious freedom; Religious pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Freedom of religion; Legal pluralism; Institutionalism","score_opus":0.015436925973886677,"score_gpt":0.26201559154547,"score_spread":0.2465786655715833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7146357267","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94903415,0.00049711455,0.000099597055,0.009224022,0.000044734723,0.00003189275,0.0003081963,0.000007550828,0.040752675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907928,0.00013928112,0.00006567427,0.0003928337,0.0000051380543,0.0000073955525,0.000049154554,0.000005040242,0.008542669],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751866,0.0002732217,0.000047974885,0.00013239116,0.0004086153,0.0016192087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99441636,0.00096968166,0.00055810454,0.0001485476,0.0011751166,0.002732142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015092316,0.00013817013,0.000361042,0.0018600967,0.022668049,0.0067007397,0.0013060693,0.00097184925,0.010553357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050536045,0.00023976206,0.00031690337,0.0034104767,0.0072192103,0.0013191585,0.0035205518,0.0026561173,0.00021357738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035316165,0.00037299152,0.33197173,0.00015609739,0.00008354399,0.0018092727,0.3097188,0.0006180216,0.00082031457,0.26837426,0.026349027,0.059372786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058768313,0.00004410741,0.39492318,0.00030392522,0.00004015562,0.00025449882,0.49866182,0.0006244106,0.0004971154,0.0070950678,0.09737856,0.00011833929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99865985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12667564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12667564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15504104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91910034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7146616356","doi":"","title":"The Significance and Possibility of Constitutional Law with Multicultural Clause (2) : Multiculturalism in Canada from the Perspective of Human Rights Theory","year":2012,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Human rights; Perspective (graphical); Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Constitutional economics","score_opus":0.021023202444698685,"score_gpt":0.2832862232163707,"score_spread":0.262263020771672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7146616356","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4591084,0.0027919714,0.008110906,0.06420501,0.00021581443,0.000110068184,0.00046638597,0.00005513167,0.46493632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921103,0.00026261652,0.0008997692,0.0009045097,0.000024267625,0.00001217189,0.000026701773,0.000010038464,0.0057496796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932365,0.0014557259,0.00018878408,0.0007777228,0.001635785,0.0027055913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884841,0.0059288815,0.0007247461,0.0006791979,0.002866473,0.0013166342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005883709,0.00027073536,0.00075222226,0.0023951477,0.02178949,0.016895173,0.0030959242,0.0037422082,0.009181375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018356375,0.00043187308,0.0006683749,0.0038608355,0.0306578,0.008077568,0.0046775513,0.004868267,0.00016662577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015119237,0.000012969035,0.0028340206,0.000020136762,0.000008010736,0.00015903571,0.0065977937,0.00034964373,0.000057869478,0.9845265,0.0018336794,0.003585137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099316436,0.000035373145,0.023945605,0.00031801738,0.0001663637,0.0003219139,0.07113819,0.007547056,0.00086196774,0.80439043,0.09098429,0.0001915229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9819115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.984012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08146185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08146185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15279952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5910498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7154048727","doi":"10.3917/dhs.039.0639zm","title":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction, vol. 18, n o  4, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, 2006, p. 405-556.","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dix-huitième siècle","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Identification (biology); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.018584232665706378,"score_gpt":0.23907793797907195,"score_spread":0.22049370531336557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7154048727","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034652401,0.38029665,0.0012271577,0.02989359,0.006152935,0.000069382666,0.003336184,0.00025910602,0.57529974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032290306,0.09225313,0.0008211737,0.002795842,0.0010549143,0.00006820656,0.00091914134,0.00021126594,0.86958605],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957937,0.000056228044,0.000021318874,0.00006275498,0.00019458457,0.00008577155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995566,0.00013361493,0.00003865002,0.00004453519,0.00015440353,0.00007223427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041347195,0.001336119,0.00054788595,0.0021648412,0.00581879,0.004632857,0.0010833375,0.0014734707,0.06702597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015301309,0.00066398515,0.00036176087,0.0049997577,0.0052732835,0.0021584693,0.0014339075,0.0016736207,0.012504322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004140889,0.000009587207,0.00046443124,0.0004056886,0.000009596199,0.0001562271,0.005346631,0.00008343379,0.00022966282,0.03347099,0.9117316,0.048050787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035478517,0.0000028243592,0.0019241144,0.00023652501,0.000004661175,0.00006570976,0.0012919161,0.00002020812,0.00008884241,0.0021463768,0.9942093,0.00000589673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65297025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89905816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34702975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02684513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014077843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69814694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7159961388","doi":"10.2307/jj.41749204.5","title":"CONTEXT OF CHURCH, THEOLOGY, AND SOCIETY ON THE EVE OF THE COUNCIL IN ENGLISH-SPEAKING CANADA","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Peeters Publishers eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.040452121312093366,"score_gpt":0.2353931370385382,"score_spread":0.19494101572644484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7159961388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124909446,0.01750623,0.000530478,0.047651183,0.0009002216,0.00006511476,0.00024826787,0.000032961536,0.80815613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8711366,0.0041190484,0.0002620446,0.0021095509,0.000090698304,0.000024464021,0.000049035785,0.000051866846,0.122156784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966002,0.0007991195,0.000039358652,0.000178803,0.00060799194,0.0017745557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971723,0.0006443475,0.00011081777,0.000066975444,0.00071509666,0.0012904347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013541592,0.0004018203,0.00061332545,0.0014467577,0.04373548,0.01439936,0.0022547825,0.0030105868,0.012572843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003945004,0.00047153266,0.00024067683,0.0034391563,0.026616892,0.0023386334,0.0040934063,0.0071552508,0.00047211468],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034538534,0.00005074798,0.0020730286,0.00005629511,0.000008538978,0.00048184214,0.117191344,0.00030597433,0.00012879654,0.82813364,0.036813185,0.014722078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025127765,0.0000242543,0.019666225,0.00070981303,0.000028729612,0.00017898307,0.28038386,0.00041162866,0.00019792792,0.03886863,0.65942615,0.000078737416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.994947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18696849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18696849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26092345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94300133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161753316","doi":"10.82308/19193","title":"Hidden fault lines: uncovering the colonial threads underlying the characterization of religion in Canadian courts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Christianity; Colonialism; Freedom of religion; Context (archaeology); Presupposition; Spirituality; Charter","score_opus":0.031151033190281535,"score_gpt":0.3285066574328684,"score_spread":0.2973556242425869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161753316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87617964,0.0011782016,0.0017076306,0.011965462,0.000040978855,0.000072042254,0.00025667265,0.000019771962,0.108579725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99611217,0.00039385044,0.00045507273,0.00048476877,0.00000753143,0.000011100235,0.000050225794,0.000010034607,0.0024753239],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.995741,0.0007682083,0.00011314211,0.00044860138,0.0014493713,0.0014797403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989365,0.0049053165,0.0011705977,0.00058469106,0.003044607,0.0009297471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037214027,0.00026645957,0.00034761464,0.0041162656,0.023538921,0.011219692,0.0021788233,0.002201903,0.0033703633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019415349,0.00044574673,0.00023830756,0.006230671,0.03044346,0.0050243195,0.004428979,0.003541667,0.00014687961],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058584083,0.00003932448,0.04964057,0.00008631281,0.000018411685,0.00075071125,0.5620073,0.0004962168,0.0008883405,0.3570744,0.005099467,0.02384035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002109116,0.000023892237,0.17140386,0.0004675806,0.00007895338,0.00027450107,0.6949907,0.0035093925,0.0008432383,0.04773942,0.0804894,0.00015790323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98897654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99452233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13823654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13823654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.095412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161839726","doi":"10.82308/23099","title":"Making sense of who we are: justification, community and judgment in section 7 of the canadian charter","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Economic Justice; Doctrine; Reel","score_opus":0.07273039417326833,"score_gpt":0.339070725005214,"score_spread":0.2663403308319457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161839726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044140913,0.0054717604,0.0051640044,0.06776396,0.00049314805,0.00012373581,0.00028773773,0.00005127232,0.87650347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91550153,0.0018551018,0.002674625,0.00676421,0.00016171145,0.000085549465,0.00009990831,0.00004426197,0.07281295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908954,0.0027368679,0.00019483852,0.0007476692,0.0026707812,0.0027544918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99616903,0.0011889114,0.0002168028,0.0002089957,0.0016532062,0.00056309014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006140259,0.0003994653,0.00044599216,0.0015167906,0.020337991,0.012127154,0.0016247869,0.004502129,0.0045129857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008583027,0.00027643895,0.00039861206,0.0019706478,0.034167774,0.0038368697,0.0031473567,0.005195255,0.00041328243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038037997,0.000002726117,0.00037527157,0.000012718994,0.0000014647762,0.000043607055,0.008565826,0.000089201436,0.000022637481,0.98080724,0.007462665,0.0026128837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001964364,0.00001595047,0.0073925424,0.0005175837,0.000028116005,0.00011641009,0.029548097,0.0010796335,0.00026974909,0.48980558,0.47108835,0.00011834199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95338744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97265875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08524436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08524436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12175452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61849403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161843845","doi":"10.82308/10992","title":"Beyond the Courts: Rethinking Charter Review to Foster Effective and Sustainable Rights Protection in Federal Lawmaking","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Executive branch; Context (archaeology); Citizenship","score_opus":0.01747465770335359,"score_gpt":0.32672243042667437,"score_spread":0.30924777272332077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161843845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09051947,0.024869714,0.16269988,0.26233453,0.007882201,0.0030153445,0.0003123606,0.0019073291,0.44645923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7701177,0.010802785,0.0770214,0.051203296,0.0028998386,0.0019825532,0.0003408107,0.0009427802,0.08468883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8723908,0.070703454,0.006805612,0.010500184,0.029668977,0.009930951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78030163,0.14056894,0.010492727,0.01964603,0.04103047,0.007960149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13215066,0.0006293626,0.001250319,0.007838833,0.015421813,0.027820006,0.0052522,0.011965438,0.008982355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20440504,0.0012827769,0.0015222729,0.0040695,0.016467512,0.022892898,0.015668238,0.0117634665,0.0024790154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007853668,0.00017666002,0.0037231122,0.00083477696,0.000053950764,0.00091527513,0.037203595,0.0022314868,0.0020071089,0.6969096,0.06780847,0.18805745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013608688,0.00025410054,0.004370789,0.0031081268,0.00016791272,0.00030711293,0.014128852,0.003517795,0.0026994785,0.15622799,0.8148308,0.00025090796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039386448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07836346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13215066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023737967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09194965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6988878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161844418","doi":"10.82308/50510","title":"The value of religion according to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Freedom of religion; Normative; Charter; Value (mathematics); Autonomy; Religious freedom","score_opus":0.023725209770017335,"score_gpt":0.32026263161431684,"score_spread":0.2965374218442995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161844418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15960483,0.0034672378,0.0021384044,0.056550026,0.0005048057,0.00006144038,0.00033797015,0.00003795194,0.7772974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793124,0.0007598168,0.0003214203,0.0039914194,0.000078770434,0.000011547655,0.000052628933,0.000014268945,0.015457711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99031353,0.001406394,0.00017213865,0.00089795724,0.0045170905,0.0026928764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987111,0.0034485029,0.00066029676,0.00041132895,0.006499789,0.0018691758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044470136,0.0001659701,0.0003538794,0.0012216119,0.017513495,0.011530867,0.0013324223,0.0029361448,0.0047718105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016687168,0.00026103697,0.00025966676,0.0019214263,0.019260371,0.0022734087,0.002533666,0.0055363798,0.0002629501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011805926,0.000009879642,0.003949148,0.000021681768,0.000007177119,0.00014320233,0.00878412,0.00022947614,0.00015486199,0.9694826,0.012040569,0.0051655136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059397,0.000053877215,0.052878127,0.0011604392,0.00009840215,0.00023883428,0.041497882,0.002645941,0.0011076547,0.2896861,0.6102668,0.00030647957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95543975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9740337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10256061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10256061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12567782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74413276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161872955","doi":"10.82308/23935","title":"Appealing to higher authority : explaining the Federal Government's appeals to the Supreme Court of Canada in charter cases","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Charter; Government (linguistics); Judicial review; Victory; Context (archaeology); Court of record; Legislation","score_opus":0.04287019622100647,"score_gpt":0.3107487260107281,"score_spread":0.26787852978972165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161872955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68723917,0.0013290776,0.0028201786,0.027307782,0.0001289339,0.00015972006,0.00021232625,0.0000581541,0.2807447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947161,0.0002685377,0.00035877814,0.0007623003,0.000019307518,0.000014809348,0.000035274737,0.00001669601,0.0038081969],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98873514,0.0025833952,0.00027577614,0.0008198179,0.0039162417,0.0036696026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98275536,0.010520464,0.0012420524,0.00032653112,0.0035025247,0.0016530907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062629357,0.00038157718,0.00048434144,0.0043712803,0.028737381,0.017875407,0.002856423,0.00543968,0.0056313085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028048987,0.0004988867,0.0005596803,0.0047304276,0.02683661,0.0044278842,0.0062915417,0.006529446,0.00035838626],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043282234,0.000087975095,0.015387114,0.00006619937,0.0000142390445,0.0019157724,0.5559538,0.0009363212,0.0004562341,0.41125557,0.0059603504,0.007923213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045272915,0.00003081885,0.06520675,0.000606272,0.00006334518,0.00042214352,0.72374225,0.0064571397,0.0005050826,0.08046004,0.12226338,0.00019752797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98012596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9777796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16298388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16298388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09184657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97082007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161958684","doi":"10.82308/15659","title":"Section 515 (10) (c) Criminal Code: At the intersection of the media, judicial legitimacy and the rule of law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial interpretation; Context (archaeology); Judicial review; Judicial opinion; Judicial activism; Public opinion; Supreme court","score_opus":0.04126500395542977,"score_gpt":0.3444769249472973,"score_spread":0.30321192099186756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161958684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0799231,0.0066527417,0.0055025895,0.09480943,0.0006322802,0.000044819026,0.00025809923,0.000050861883,0.8121261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.967911,0.0025966326,0.0016546893,0.0075579104,0.0001804213,0.000025724834,0.00005790241,0.000029539271,0.019986108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99553335,0.0008094133,0.000072351606,0.00037456152,0.0021631243,0.001047152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99672467,0.0014418266,0.00020613118,0.00014657875,0.0012023393,0.00027845352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028067906,0.0002934517,0.00025054815,0.0018224838,0.010600544,0.014487299,0.0012149046,0.0030240242,0.0028986298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061334656,0.00018562585,0.00021612305,0.0016820168,0.03222795,0.002469224,0.0019145472,0.0034768758,0.00032195362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038779876,0.000005031563,0.0007345428,0.000017982838,0.0000014059561,0.000066216744,0.010285775,0.00011362633,0.000096517506,0.9759389,0.0072534946,0.005482658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018710572,0.000029637518,0.018411675,0.0010276453,0.00003514538,0.00022681967,0.049426664,0.001213029,0.0010071634,0.40577844,0.5227177,0.00010736983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8850326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9149439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8850326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05611985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.080161616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40717995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161967125","doi":"10.82308/44220","title":"Perfect strangers: The social dimension of the law's interaction with religion in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Dialectic; Dimension (graph theory); Context (archaeology); Face (sociological concept); Social relation","score_opus":0.014784700515579235,"score_gpt":0.2959897418909913,"score_spread":0.2812050413754121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161967125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7299636,0.003801779,0.0028767097,0.04462433,0.00029948386,0.00011054816,0.00027197882,0.00005354571,0.217998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98639685,0.0010632074,0.00041620736,0.0015376252,0.000020064017,0.0000147146775,0.000040959527,0.00002381359,0.010486483],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99157554,0.002293623,0.00013918155,0.00074732595,0.0028440882,0.0024002602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99285513,0.0026236505,0.00063370814,0.00022310729,0.0018297256,0.0018348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039105457,0.00036296275,0.00056905893,0.0023027544,0.05599656,0.016556902,0.0029267084,0.0033349807,0.0045672343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009527105,0.00042704892,0.0004679501,0.004270359,0.042113133,0.0041040005,0.008663572,0.0056995265,0.00022156654],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023239612,0.00002332343,0.013223028,0.00007151495,0.000023443607,0.0012544977,0.80826366,0.00041916463,0.00046022888,0.15754034,0.0070688045,0.01162871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065642453,0.000017094399,0.021032242,0.00027231235,0.000029822684,0.00023839579,0.7912064,0.0006704779,0.00026575805,0.010490856,0.17567292,0.000097202974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99338007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2220428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2220428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9023201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161980459","doi":"10.82308/41983","title":"Lessons from India's constitutional culture: what Canada can learn","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Ideology; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Economic Justice; Social rights","score_opus":0.02414725801966782,"score_gpt":0.3119593719998607,"score_spread":0.28781211398019285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161980459","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07507113,0.05092969,0.00080779026,0.6908323,0.0037648187,0.00004768158,0.0010375304,0.00007166521,0.17743747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80227715,0.08525263,0.0019186259,0.07491918,0.0010664889,0.00005211214,0.0006777465,0.00012914668,0.03370698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99500054,0.00082762685,0.000106640095,0.00038552875,0.0014760904,0.002203457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862423,0.0032281354,0.00040845224,0.0005822015,0.005361548,0.004177414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004779015,0.00049299723,0.0009255903,0.00205424,0.021109026,0.01553668,0.0020505737,0.002407158,0.011180255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010390374,0.00031018732,0.0005110528,0.0070323097,0.014258652,0.008412564,0.005124495,0.008554386,0.0007465699],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014696112,0.00016593079,0.01640094,0.0012565433,0.00007085873,0.0011424384,0.12320842,0.00047319254,0.00045071146,0.42362282,0.24153918,0.19152205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028249306,0.000039382005,0.022977227,0.0023104453,0.00007966286,0.00022053762,0.26415864,0.0003085355,0.0004266698,0.046042945,0.6632473,0.00016043427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9783159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9878065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09726657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09726657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21563426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7057216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162024931","doi":"10.82308/54621","title":"What we have yet failed to achieve: a study of Charles Taylor's Canadian social criticism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Identity (music); Context (archaeology); Social criticism; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.032751890935481046,"score_gpt":0.35497800738746493,"score_spread":0.3222261164519839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162024931","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3873246,0.010373555,0.003121719,0.16199332,0.0011387231,0.00020318507,0.00010394789,0.00010700654,0.43563393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9573807,0.002719595,0.0007953933,0.0066482103,0.00011819547,0.000067202156,0.000021969388,0.00008643374,0.03216221],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98272014,0.0062132003,0.00020063743,0.00092918007,0.0059401626,0.003996607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788496,0.010184056,0.001054199,0.00046357934,0.0067430073,0.0027055899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0102830585,0.0006663755,0.000890399,0.004139759,0.086800195,0.016912067,0.003648704,0.007707268,0.0029701062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027380275,0.00057627243,0.00046925578,0.0067579173,0.057918034,0.005543184,0.0053550913,0.008961436,0.00042215723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016812113,0.000025448871,0.0017025154,0.00006234852,0.000005150159,0.00069761905,0.8004748,0.00014866899,0.00018114275,0.17145298,0.017794035,0.007438516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007747948,0.000017443559,0.0031247498,0.00033437938,0.000012656183,0.00032626567,0.66727865,0.0003758487,0.00017511474,0.0140759805,0.3141971,0.00007403236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9643026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9692495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20745412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20745412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17379193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9192409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162034432","doi":"10.82308/1163","title":"Comparative analysis of constitutional law mechanism for human rights protection in Canada and Russia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Ratification; Right to property; Constitution; Convention; Linguistic rights","score_opus":0.03747680261120276,"score_gpt":0.3376061120613846,"score_spread":0.3001293094501818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162034432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47267568,0.00374077,0.0049403436,0.005593537,0.00008613265,0.00022314003,0.00078745396,0.00007398563,0.5118789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850328,0.0010826967,0.001288212,0.00021751437,0.000011346325,0.00003869325,0.00021020543,0.000019579578,0.012098835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99370676,0.0007506884,0.0001418654,0.00045563522,0.0027121215,0.0022328598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99424064,0.0014879988,0.00045442546,0.00033329273,0.0029808076,0.00050280936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028253614,0.00018402482,0.00050296914,0.005326925,0.009109275,0.0067163156,0.0013672417,0.0010172897,0.009003289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010850352,0.00025441629,0.0005789693,0.005332691,0.0051706242,0.0015543211,0.0016228828,0.0015244677,0.00031258422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045288758,0.00002521211,0.013073156,0.000083406805,0.000041925097,0.00028141154,0.005589475,0.0013094861,0.0006149135,0.9600322,0.0027498535,0.016153634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015640963,0.00010417289,0.32921064,0.0009418788,0.0005841366,0.0006880973,0.053675324,0.010613936,0.003970061,0.12385856,0.47593918,0.00025765042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94449544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95062095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08020815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08020815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.084057026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58195364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162035074","doi":"10.82308/12572","title":"Tomber entre les mailles du filet:L'Injustice administrative substantive en droit social Québécois","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Social rights; Administrative law; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.02825063636421184,"score_gpt":0.3231759277491274,"score_spread":0.2949252913849156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162035074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72337544,0.0048818826,0.0030060562,0.062558085,0.00054981053,0.00009145969,0.0006302704,0.00007619061,0.20483078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9104577,0.0013499963,0.0003813438,0.0020328967,0.000072093346,0.000033675333,0.000073065974,0.000025405177,0.085573934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866605,0.00043099368,0.000025267089,0.00014311614,0.00036008365,0.00037444665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970477,0.0013983232,0.00026495618,0.00010173818,0.0008030304,0.00038433613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018070457,0.0003147826,0.00029787296,0.0010140042,0.014510915,0.0055479095,0.0009467441,0.0030048229,0.015166612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053288196,0.00023978925,0.00031052256,0.0011589349,0.007017651,0.0021167074,0.001302256,0.0031481993,0.00076226343],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011715737,0.00023488929,0.044891104,0.00016893564,0.000046859794,0.002751877,0.32619908,0.0013245401,0.0014010279,0.4778727,0.074271195,0.070720546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003915723,0.00008893809,0.15861115,0.0005696572,0.00003849703,0.0011388826,0.28784668,0.001593546,0.0014707997,0.010792337,0.5376742,0.00013615658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9569388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9584254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043459382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043459382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025837578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3153214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162700861","doi":"","title":"Freedom of Expression in Canada ―Focusing on Judicial Review Framework―","year":2017,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expression (computer science); Judicial review; Freedom of expression; Legislation","score_opus":0.04204553658292317,"score_gpt":0.32954094888915403,"score_spread":0.2874954123062309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162700861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2984532,0.003240762,0.0057711094,0.06609302,0.000336522,0.00027853088,0.0019091088,0.00017840942,0.6237393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9511659,0.0005017033,0.0013717785,0.002508447,0.00006114586,0.00006114329,0.00019462159,0.000048178008,0.04408703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9687691,0.0047946977,0.0009486275,0.0028206687,0.010860692,0.0118063055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9472222,0.02107483,0.0021892984,0.0033851343,0.019537993,0.0065906243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015953852,0.00034712965,0.0010277589,0.004687363,0.033030834,0.02529357,0.0040488676,0.004947634,0.011467202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05855636,0.0007722751,0.0008783102,0.007971269,0.013840193,0.0056996667,0.006459553,0.0061724917,0.000635763],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004929028,0.000036149722,0.007882102,0.00003985745,0.000024677585,0.00018877335,0.005975001,0.0010169336,0.00012928984,0.9452384,0.025782883,0.013636579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015964311,0.000084940075,0.085310124,0.00079051347,0.0002394843,0.00035753977,0.039472375,0.00915614,0.0014883701,0.27191558,0.5904572,0.00056808704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9911616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16893017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16893017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37131003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9639232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164254677","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review over Welfare and Health Claims under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (2)","year":2008,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Judicial review; Welfare rights; Welfare; Health claims on food labels","score_opus":0.046128172409596276,"score_gpt":0.3155112033623595,"score_spread":0.2693830309527632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164254677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09311263,0.011632824,0.013745477,0.18116051,0.0073909885,0.0043696584,0.03215301,0.0011117255,0.65532327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5654516,0.009953855,0.022371892,0.1037977,0.0047213673,0.0015307291,0.0150281675,0.0006137283,0.27653095],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9020573,0.009047589,0.006315585,0.004927106,0.061701488,0.015950898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77389294,0.091152065,0.006240438,0.011129102,0.11131337,0.0062720366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.078985214,0.00082971214,0.0016151182,0.019826505,0.020933649,0.017402666,0.0096453605,0.01369727,0.009002488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17769735,0.0017297363,0.0014237108,0.013727872,0.00828038,0.0044550425,0.0049060946,0.010693213,0.0016937034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022944939,0.00011838694,0.009401729,0.0005210213,0.00012830844,0.00081710133,0.005457792,0.0007156822,0.0012180163,0.2426167,0.6939913,0.044784553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023587351,0.000074875745,0.03971484,0.0017634204,0.00050224754,0.0003267564,0.0043714102,0.0034407715,0.0034050778,0.026395516,0.91936064,0.00040857831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93982476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95758057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9224633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07753672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33877018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5625709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164257524","doi":"","title":"Judicial Reviewover Welfare and Health Care Claims under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1)","year":2006,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Welfare rights; Health care; Welfare; Legislation; Health insurance","score_opus":0.023702782040211635,"score_gpt":0.29545784144136467,"score_spread":0.271755059401153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164257524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11824487,0.013476316,0.011130094,0.13943934,0.0037555501,0.0036055325,0.044396624,0.0011861697,0.6647655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6446831,0.0102843065,0.023116695,0.047018036,0.003151973,0.0010891702,0.023714993,0.0005013129,0.24644037],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9181958,0.0071798335,0.0043682205,0.0031799776,0.054450203,0.01262607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8389594,0.049174055,0.0076158256,0.009940647,0.08848678,0.005823295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04770535,0.0007441336,0.0013396995,0.018407267,0.020834615,0.01595886,0.008523262,0.008013166,0.010497934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13876766,0.0012527037,0.0010361164,0.014942235,0.0062107206,0.0042965394,0.005304297,0.00582113,0.0016102752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021920593,0.0001528156,0.019058583,0.00046491218,0.00011497039,0.0007218897,0.0040878067,0.0008391027,0.0009029919,0.20471139,0.7045361,0.064190336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001798175,0.00006947992,0.0793027,0.0012844333,0.00038707463,0.00039509882,0.003949127,0.0045604366,0.00334238,0.02504559,0.88109726,0.0003866002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96225655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97964215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91563743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08436259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34402618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6120963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164267570","doi":"","title":"Principles of Fundamental Justice under Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2016,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Economic Justice; Fundamental rights; Human rights","score_opus":0.03582596644106721,"score_gpt":0.27963496128792414,"score_spread":0.24380899484685692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164267570","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041362867,0.004059565,0.013614041,0.05507542,0.003000212,0.0011064785,0.0011964514,0.0002534974,0.91755813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31820253,0.0071160193,0.10303712,0.14069647,0.0036357203,0.0037888521,0.0015603416,0.00055739516,0.4214056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9383326,0.010311199,0.0037719638,0.0058883876,0.028155297,0.013540547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.968016,0.009802049,0.0013988015,0.002875956,0.014946084,0.002961093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030811783,0.0020106311,0.0028299517,0.00441786,0.03402685,0.02304936,0.0059387833,0.029802255,0.011489559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043948017,0.0028452927,0.0044764183,0.0042743185,0.049325302,0.007873294,0.0065047075,0.04064725,0.0033238225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065626755,0.00001979031,0.00010403346,0.0000333276,0.000008990806,0.000032100794,0.0013349177,0.00025020604,0.000048828373,0.96909505,0.026976485,0.0020896988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008350678,0.000033705437,0.0022163757,0.0007999585,0.000056473233,0.00013133,0.0020810124,0.0008205002,0.00033308202,0.5242633,0.46877897,0.00040190964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9037104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91746086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096289575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09306119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3235561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6752093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W71647670","doi":"","title":"What You Should Know About Divorce In Ontario","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.10728310649979529,"score_gpt":0.32467079475612953,"score_spread":0.21738768825633425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W71647670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47209385,0.022978509,0.00026863188,0.4288732,0.0012925135,0.00006396663,0.0019366764,0.000017942632,0.07247468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91947424,0.020276373,0.0002787313,0.03473768,0.00042512178,0.000051265197,0.00065343396,0.00003416933,0.024069073],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962335,0.0006588768,0.00021171513,0.00022850987,0.001226384,0.0014409382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97991645,0.0037198802,0.003094101,0.00046035252,0.0056842454,0.00712506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002611337,0.000148273,0.0004936777,0.0010525825,0.017529715,0.004189268,0.0014862509,0.0026463445,0.009789232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018405778,0.00044157734,0.0005016986,0.0035741343,0.0046942667,0.0039552343,0.0029976633,0.0051131593,0.000453996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031295914,0.00022699706,0.3968768,0.0012089551,0.00023574963,0.0022991512,0.2949365,0.0004658015,0.0003539657,0.025178865,0.19022304,0.08768111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038056653,0.00005848767,0.3384467,0.0018831237,0.000112759866,0.00054869696,0.3779152,0.00015852024,0.00018766607,0.0036295133,0.27686638,0.00015487871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99328953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99815375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10332033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10332033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1758872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.749645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164975677","doi":"","title":"The \"Dialogue\" Theory in the Canadian Constitution : The Relationship of the Judicial Review between the Legislature and the Judiciary","year":2007,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Constitution; Legislature; Judicial independence; Judicial activism; Legislation","score_opus":0.036098823946374196,"score_gpt":0.31039233447394293,"score_spread":0.27429351052756873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164975677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044530407,0.003368868,0.023891592,0.14260834,0.0008465711,0.00023571537,0.0005542062,0.00017593958,0.7837883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9444139,0.001527292,0.0063542984,0.007705118,0.00044245445,0.00016219718,0.00011981235,0.0001127273,0.039162338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806723,0.0059693875,0.00041362597,0.002241109,0.006771237,0.0039323554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9744692,0.014557397,0.001226675,0.001327075,0.0067699733,0.0016495605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015083476,0.00063270313,0.00080909376,0.0064279684,0.029166164,0.020499151,0.005134793,0.009172465,0.018054305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05922481,0.0009526369,0.00082061294,0.010357242,0.04574881,0.016300904,0.005276929,0.01021774,0.0009659119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069020457,0.000004996015,0.00025839196,0.000014614851,0.0000030286992,0.00002059708,0.0032288216,0.00020028181,0.000023748933,0.98992985,0.003662045,0.002646703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010275092,0.000026850694,0.0072752307,0.0003551793,0.00012373719,0.000095168005,0.012849386,0.004278454,0.00049720734,0.81057733,0.1636833,0.00013549613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9493913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9462994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88318324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11681674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24660276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84756875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165502841","doi":"","title":"Cronshaw Review of How (Not) To Be Secular: Reading Charles Taylor, by Smith","year":2018,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"ePlace - Preserving, Learning, and Creative Exchange (Asbury Theological Seminary)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Reading (process); Close reading","score_opus":0.033724352432142383,"score_gpt":0.32735603118533263,"score_spread":0.29363167875319024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165502841","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001048593,0.9269065,0.00012076715,0.040833745,0.018303316,0.0000059973117,0.00004272241,0.000011830707,0.013670285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029792532,0.9100641,0.00030304815,0.03263985,0.017907614,0.00003340437,0.000113539165,0.000068620975,0.03589052],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990067,0.00025920017,0.000072380935,0.0001675365,0.00041164423,0.00008246068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966827,0.0012871923,0.00015441838,0.000086365486,0.0015245534,0.0002647165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015889435,0.0009857105,0.0010189629,0.0038636734,0.002258104,0.0033320514,0.0013667308,0.0036479516,0.013667555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006469724,0.00059363997,0.00035707225,0.0063276505,0.004445867,0.0054874527,0.0015782756,0.0058175405,0.007176552],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008652833,0.000008092633,0.000046292775,0.0006693438,0.0000030564456,0.00003223369,0.00035508958,0.00003778238,0.00004095673,0.006139506,0.9393786,0.05328043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017796528,0.0000031307661,0.00035524523,0.0015953893,0.0000020427633,0.00005724273,0.00020027236,0.000006951163,0.000018325754,0.001484884,0.9962692,0.000005552435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06898533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09740895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06898533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068505066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009255447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13716763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7203669","doi":"","title":"Evolving Capacities: The B.C. Representative for Children and Youth as a Hybrid Model of Oversight","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Government (linguistics); Foster care; Political science; Welfare; Representation (politics); Public administration; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.027184314241676832,"score_gpt":0.28136721749544474,"score_spread":0.2541829032537679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7203669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09830654,0.0023017118,0.05978522,0.03866028,0.0003082984,0.00021449525,0.00009175243,0.00021510039,0.8001166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9541765,0.00044196384,0.009561289,0.0020193798,0.000046010005,0.0001259204,0.000024270646,0.00004508413,0.03355973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832138,0.008781045,0.00032109616,0.0019797005,0.002698208,0.0030060322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902872,0.0026003483,0.0007371758,0.0013437612,0.0020088437,0.0030225604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011450636,0.00046871504,0.0003573358,0.0025606262,0.012479829,0.0151223885,0.0024490268,0.0038182086,0.0067370688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012851364,0.00052024174,0.00043264756,0.0021772182,0.061174754,0.008658524,0.011793332,0.004918418,0.0005596651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007802971,0.000008210498,0.0011740903,0.000013274971,0.0000036589404,0.00014597744,0.014225894,0.00042632403,0.00005431916,0.9752372,0.0019871483,0.0067160795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039707407,0.000067006345,0.0032265333,0.0004241556,0.000030423591,0.00064166024,0.03904102,0.003508674,0.00037029042,0.5661404,0.386395,0.00011505332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3901674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3623354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60983264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043819867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042863075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7757927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W73375900","doi":"","title":"Changing the Line of Succession to the Crown","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Commonwealth; Legislation; Kingdom; Queen (butterfly); Ecological succession; House of Commons; Law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Sovereignty; State (computer science); Prime minister; Parliament; Public administration; History; Politics","score_opus":0.039198502016569804,"score_gpt":0.3153684373928854,"score_spread":0.27616993537631557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W73375900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04726629,0.2936447,0.0014797965,0.11904013,0.009209689,0.00013799101,0.00041246277,0.000059428883,0.5287495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7103947,0.10749663,0.0018434573,0.07085546,0.0010872302,0.00007210691,0.00033488072,0.00008366423,0.10783192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919155,0.002262859,0.00030907133,0.0006836312,0.0030776644,0.0017511736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99285215,0.0016410791,0.00042950927,0.0002913127,0.003927632,0.00085826515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006602276,0.00017648023,0.00039746196,0.0014362548,0.006622428,0.00524169,0.0014153597,0.0021233915,0.005248308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019772027,0.000206086,0.00024733567,0.0020524336,0.0067012664,0.0020255058,0.0017741498,0.0031599891,0.0008277371],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005932106,0.00003729626,0.0024446535,0.001316094,0.000019989884,0.00034822323,0.022860408,0.00018081354,0.0008180691,0.57798105,0.23866065,0.15527353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004568763,0.000014884826,0.0043886234,0.00075762323,0.000009317769,0.000070393166,0.0044765687,0.000014491209,0.00014813193,0.0023335782,0.9877715,0.000010336843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81937546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8857905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18062454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03838147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07069769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3633765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W751313829","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2821","title":"Substantive Equality As Equal Recognition: A New Theory of Section 15 of the Charter","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.13256272786081788,"score_gpt":0.34198915064985225,"score_spread":0.20942642278903437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W751313829","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015903033,0.0033024873,0.122518964,0.033308603,0.0013987771,0.000121650024,0.00012946478,0.0000880811,0.823229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91667277,0.0019649104,0.020420913,0.01075282,0.0010890258,0.0002507986,0.0001343208,0.0000910537,0.048623357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.985529,0.0045649493,0.00033507755,0.0017604162,0.0050241216,0.0027865323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950054,0.002122608,0.00047639472,0.0006046277,0.0013973538,0.00039358324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009141877,0.0007055185,0.00079573976,0.0028713525,0.009121766,0.013395766,0.003254457,0.0056683035,0.006072518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009238318,0.0003968823,0.0011448141,0.0022389903,0.06711605,0.010949339,0.005510306,0.010805561,0.00073530443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.619573e-7,0.0000011846192,0.000022755037,0.0000023945124,4.3512716e-7,0.0000056742815,0.0003930764,0.000044379904,0.0000067228107,0.9986738,0.00030661118,0.0005421139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009245032,0.000009993184,0.00021465855,0.00006835924,0.000006842985,0.000036230715,0.0006195901,0.00054408633,0.00008471151,0.94971895,0.04867009,0.000017282966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23191352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15964404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7680865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030664844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03788365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46112722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W76022651","doi":"10.21991/c9bw82","title":"AMENDING THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06688833277426015,"score_gpt":0.2938406459485605,"score_spread":0.22695231317430037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W76022651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024636254,0.010620563,0.0018202045,0.15247877,0.008038406,0.00037005084,0.0019129507,0.0002195943,0.7999032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.348022,0.009558046,0.009646387,0.12824218,0.0019664126,0.00047736324,0.0013490078,0.0003179688,0.50042063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97905123,0.0017486368,0.00055987143,0.0013298804,0.009604194,0.007706193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844542,0.0020286287,0.0002802449,0.00090676115,0.010140891,0.0021892567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009131862,0.0007303982,0.00080792734,0.004189411,0.027239004,0.012952512,0.0031210128,0.010988596,0.013109076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028889963,0.00069271296,0.0013707477,0.004139258,0.0074173305,0.0027775709,0.004394643,0.0100224,0.0012166053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042733216,0.000028126124,0.0014315979,0.00011563019,0.000021555403,0.00025989575,0.002819352,0.00080343784,0.0005479613,0.71473837,0.25612625,0.023065198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037867838,0.000014532507,0.007343102,0.00021604949,0.00004704587,0.000053294243,0.0022889874,0.00036586897,0.0004268448,0.019620832,0.9694676,0.00011803926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99596584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16251656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16251656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37868947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97136205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W771442057","doi":"10.29173/alr27","title":"&lt;i&gt;Manitoba Metis Federation Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General)&lt;/i&gt;: Breathing New Life into the \"Empty Box\" Doctrine of \"Indian Title\"","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Supreme court; Metis; Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Original meaning; Invocation; Ratification; Political science; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032226665869876554,"score_gpt":0.28906810921587256,"score_spread":0.256841443345996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W771442057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051249806,0.09444887,0.0008897652,0.23269518,0.002509873,0.00010206263,0.0007235582,0.000075055075,0.6173057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4767346,0.0545312,0.0014802444,0.1103708,0.0006716324,0.00010475579,0.00042214652,0.000053694483,0.355631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813145,0.00021247764,0.000046809677,0.00014294815,0.00086994027,0.0005964626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980579,0.00059802854,0.0001557337,0.00004415304,0.0008599018,0.00028425184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001847368,0.00026623814,0.00021414485,0.0012886432,0.0112180095,0.0057578958,0.0015717916,0.0044274908,0.004104363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027150733,0.00037168665,0.00024716265,0.0021068316,0.006087147,0.001089484,0.00096317974,0.003674146,0.0005663872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025605514,0.000044994737,0.0060730707,0.000336058,0.000021405369,0.00068016787,0.0082096895,0.00027785773,0.0006791622,0.68086433,0.27589944,0.026888246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001957924,0.000017116907,0.016123394,0.0005425836,0.00003727547,0.000110853514,0.0060829036,0.00012240295,0.0004838716,0.0073405006,0.96907145,0.000047953657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9692583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98807305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04735251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04735251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12679802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3435681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W774734181","doi":"","title":"A Gift Yet to Be Received: Presbyteral Confirmation and Anglican-Lutheran Relations in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of ecumenical studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eucharist; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Synod; Theology; Local church; Ecclesiology; Bishops; Autonomy; Christianity; Church Growth; Independence (probability theory); Religious studies; Law; History; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.050590547041492295,"score_gpt":0.34387501234028545,"score_spread":0.29328446529879315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W774734181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7192306,0.004847242,0.00036599528,0.039746005,0.00032297138,0.000094567025,0.0006234877,0.000054383687,0.23471473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96097827,0.0011200989,0.00015794516,0.0021911655,0.000027266426,0.00001326144,0.000099127195,0.000019691259,0.035393264],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725515,0.0002980577,0.000047933765,0.00015934325,0.00064344524,0.0015961824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993587,0.0007715182,0.00050321687,0.000099849014,0.0019933386,0.003045014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013478069,0.00015742006,0.00027459968,0.0014543321,0.024281858,0.0059598456,0.0017659981,0.0014111855,0.021486752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061029824,0.0001974776,0.0001388053,0.0025046733,0.0068006297,0.0010420042,0.0029034214,0.0026736583,0.00070438476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024387217,0.0002710678,0.1774834,0.00030755193,0.000039248713,0.0038719014,0.3003455,0.0004495542,0.0009744719,0.28860953,0.12556237,0.101841606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026491356,0.0000424789,0.16367464,0.000549466,0.000035108573,0.00049427355,0.37259075,0.00042696064,0.00042696248,0.003946674,0.45768255,0.000103700746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99833256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10529119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10529119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.146361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7639446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W78414452","doi":"10.7202/043866ar","title":"PIERRE NOREAU et JOSÉ WOEHRLING (dir.), Appartenances, institutions et citoyenneté, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafeur, 2005, 319 p., ISBN 2-89127-693.788-790","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.028231682415351272,"score_gpt":0.2958553923702776,"score_spread":0.2676237099549263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W78414452","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005277983,0.9114401,0.0015442809,0.0191214,0.0066461684,0.000028969627,0.00061761896,0.00019439915,0.059879217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00785341,0.72484964,0.00228492,0.0025106608,0.0030962338,0.00006805397,0.00060801033,0.00024196309,0.25848705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992199,0.00013816544,0.000049751092,0.00014360632,0.00036870938,0.00007991211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991685,0.00032370584,0.00009991664,0.000022752027,0.00027583397,0.0001092935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010911765,0.001796451,0.0010277751,0.003284074,0.0020020048,0.004510741,0.0011307261,0.00247321,0.09835359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016856422,0.0010172587,0.00039374782,0.005888894,0.0011740839,0.006360881,0.0014137863,0.002577011,0.063046426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027360978,0.00001054377,0.00024411242,0.0007621994,0.00000803476,0.00008204167,0.0008247666,0.000055702967,0.00016954256,0.0047400543,0.8544069,0.13866869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052955183,0.000008164617,0.0012940608,0.000470581,0.000007221636,0.00029000753,0.00076019665,0.00003802167,0.00012147606,0.0012482821,0.99574006,0.00001659215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.087885134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15441082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91211486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003663914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030124192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32902557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W788731214","doi":"","title":"Equality, Comparison, Discrimination, Status","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Supreme court; Law; Charter; Equal Protection Clause; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.03032668240152423,"score_gpt":0.3466262329047006,"score_spread":0.3162995505031764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W788731214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012147632,0.015572163,0.0029364626,0.02632402,0.0005289604,0.00005594663,0.00014252453,0.00003070591,0.9422616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8257412,0.009683549,0.002571587,0.012423796,0.0003843214,0.00011717861,0.00015431405,0.000046191457,0.14887786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99453557,0.0010845949,0.000112001755,0.0004610893,0.0022500907,0.00155665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988446,0.00033307422,0.000105019266,0.00007070679,0.00042477192,0.00022183865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028685343,0.0006540041,0.0005178181,0.0024088626,0.016216917,0.007287087,0.001465507,0.0033260633,0.007826838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035805237,0.00023800919,0.00029996704,0.0032620556,0.048293844,0.0052137855,0.0046125073,0.0036047315,0.0006325238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031266777,0.0000030504668,0.00019090263,0.000013502089,9.570987e-7,0.000039573435,0.0016312177,0.000026850266,0.000017553588,0.99038625,0.00394246,0.0037445852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016513979,0.000015871557,0.0030466968,0.0003182842,0.000011474495,0.00014326326,0.00669282,0.00019905771,0.00017862691,0.6146899,0.3746555,0.00003204709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7755587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83390284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7755587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04664669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03293746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4515261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W79952626","doi":"10.21991/c9v094","title":"The Unlikely Union of Same-Sex Marriage, Polygamy and the Charter in Court","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Government (linguistics); Test (biology); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030054171413202796,"score_gpt":0.2729775993521866,"score_spread":0.24292342793898378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W79952626","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19842027,0.0037839564,0.004059949,0.17879525,0.00080613577,0.0000546614,0.00012300492,0.000040468865,0.61391634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778937,0.00038940582,0.00027891115,0.00698361,0.00017376253,0.000015527983,0.00001750186,0.000009566386,0.01423787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916055,0.002363598,0.00011940312,0.0012703979,0.0018017071,0.0028393462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937925,0.0028346467,0.0005167794,0.00044353172,0.0009427539,0.0014698873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067351125,0.00015936578,0.00038670027,0.0009336949,0.023227196,0.0134587,0.0016900693,0.007112079,0.008466673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018697033,0.00029296504,0.00021288329,0.0011093499,0.03566061,0.004845552,0.005344171,0.010060818,0.0005375727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011745964,0.000012055882,0.0015793863,0.000010012126,0.0000033266806,0.00017290983,0.00421665,0.000060622835,0.0000593935,0.9802454,0.008398035,0.0052304375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006403631,0.00004923305,0.013494582,0.00034002878,0.00004043267,0.000535475,0.035321273,0.0012934858,0.0006368858,0.66659355,0.28153718,0.00009374359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51874465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6906184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51874465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02175116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026606146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9681791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W809270734","doi":"","title":"Sacred Sites and Religious Freedom on Government Land","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Consecration; Political science; Tragedy (event); Natural resource; Law; Geography; Sociology; Archaeology; Social science; Ecology","score_opus":0.017350590218986904,"score_gpt":0.2657265281122704,"score_spread":0.24837593789328347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W809270734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62022483,0.0015741899,0.001018068,0.0021338137,0.000038059206,0.000017165936,0.00008517077,0.000011148921,0.37489754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996454,0.00018275577,0.00014098547,0.00004991412,0.000013666612,0.0000027261738,0.000017991855,0.0000027248843,0.0031352763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987392,0.00047869436,0.000041544354,0.00007761899,0.00023282357,0.00043011943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984823,0.0003688994,0.00044668064,0.00022847288,0.000103544095,0.00037008742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006568744,0.00009446171,0.0002009739,0.00081197306,0.0028468661,0.004023997,0.0005859179,0.000798014,0.008082556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021557966,0.00009049,0.00022670807,0.0009147954,0.01990501,0.0028262334,0.00455548,0.001267137,0.00029344248],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068049616,0.0000996385,0.029661288,0.00004915989,0.000015187182,0.00047244693,0.022812242,0.0006611507,0.00043105776,0.9115744,0.0016946986,0.03246048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005415308,0.00021627356,0.3120913,0.00065818895,0.000032094427,0.0012030288,0.08036764,0.001281574,0.00045489334,0.39016575,0.21339677,0.00007836062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010351271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025698971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010351271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031103846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012418099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027038872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W813338610","doi":"10.1163/ej.9789004179264.i-263.38","title":"3. Human Dignity And Same-Sex Marriage","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Law; Supreme court; Declaration; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04872514562066941,"score_gpt":0.3181387153934924,"score_spread":0.269413569772823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W813338610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040588994,0.0056584585,0.00058215036,0.0049899044,0.00028274127,0.000023648565,0.000053728058,0.000011455062,0.984339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42772883,0.010966796,0.0017794487,0.012249276,0.0005058164,0.000119984266,0.00016661423,0.000044537897,0.5464387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986603,0.00012384063,0.00003396484,0.00015324439,0.00065066316,0.00037803006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967706,0.00006884741,0.000021908443,0.00003421308,0.00015117301,0.000046773817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008349992,0.00029651774,0.00025918594,0.0007709001,0.0070991972,0.005352042,0.00085446896,0.0031091073,0.007855919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011896114,0.00013663995,0.00027090113,0.00086304883,0.017005153,0.0019528954,0.0022353758,0.003199235,0.00092525483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020828786,0.0000037689024,0.00012888058,0.000014029984,7.1007497e-7,0.00007440933,0.0025998384,0.00003322958,0.00004811637,0.9823439,0.006894029,0.007857045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066075777,0.000014515789,0.0018491548,0.0003592985,0.0000057883,0.00036625942,0.0030960548,0.00009944879,0.00027495512,0.23001246,0.763898,0.000017464223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4034376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45208952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4034376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0127200615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017909953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8021787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W814970974","doi":"","title":"Judicial Method and Three Gaps in the Supreme Court of Canada's Assisted Suicide Judgment in Carter","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Judicial review; Majority opinion; Certiorari; Judicial independence; Judicial opinion; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.04161903674440396,"score_gpt":0.32700196479203747,"score_spread":0.2853829280476335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W814970974","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046881665,0.0156139415,0.007917036,0.6990784,0.0054250737,0.00018829301,0.00040061408,0.00009165159,0.2244033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6903317,0.006825223,0.005020739,0.25562754,0.0023904252,0.00026949507,0.00014609665,0.00014462927,0.03924419],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96581286,0.00816808,0.00093690597,0.0026562612,0.0139639275,0.008462017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9702285,0.016995996,0.0010203716,0.00071560516,0.0088642975,0.0021752692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022293814,0.0005353724,0.0009686979,0.003354952,0.04389009,0.021697931,0.005662171,0.017140932,0.0021510331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057570558,0.0009649975,0.0011864478,0.0043120976,0.034308832,0.006016289,0.0055907895,0.026203874,0.0002905279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026612684,0.000013238844,0.00072789454,0.00005954393,0.000016070966,0.0003593528,0.016345868,0.0001667147,0.00014561486,0.91137034,0.06325093,0.007517797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021460674,0.000051411367,0.0065444,0.0015719641,0.00017922475,0.00042962507,0.05108051,0.0016201948,0.0016001915,0.31773955,0.61846465,0.0005036621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91366804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9529023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08633196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07834772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1561948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56845516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W821636573","doi":"","title":"Common Prayer: A View from North of the 49th Parallel","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prayer; Archbishop; Worship; Context (archaeology); Liturgy; Baptism; History; Commonwealth; Religious studies; Sociology; Law; Genealogy; Theology; Philosophy; Classics; Political science","score_opus":0.04757506302660039,"score_gpt":0.3246997143746727,"score_spread":0.2771246513480723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W821636573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07535387,0.023829281,0.0013245785,0.09995551,0.0025997856,0.000025056552,0.00004426198,0.000055255237,0.7968123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7495511,0.011430177,0.0010920854,0.031023674,0.000971457,0.00005593639,0.00003461711,0.00018673776,0.20565417],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718326,0.0009206666,0.000073361174,0.00045700086,0.00046573227,0.0008999151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977404,0.00067815155,0.00015833804,0.00014073317,0.0005502711,0.00073226006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018551657,0.00032556523,0.0005007765,0.0011700417,0.03720713,0.012899733,0.0011952023,0.004584591,0.0071327253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027948203,0.0005110762,0.00025064684,0.0010839604,0.027086413,0.0068220193,0.005050647,0.011093765,0.0012064271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040088835,0.000040847168,0.0008404495,0.0000917289,0.000005630078,0.00081737904,0.5175231,0.000038957463,0.0002982485,0.43031347,0.033379253,0.016610919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062797926,0.000023490154,0.0018722047,0.00068084383,0.000009016825,0.00037692505,0.19631104,0.00005649168,0.00015363148,0.018647416,0.78183156,0.000030944582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49300787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70629454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5069921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022797717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017056681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98027647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W822681570","doi":"","title":"Recognition, Redistribution, and Representation: Assessing the Transformative Potential of Reparations for the Indian Residential Schools Experience","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Indigenous; Redress; Political science; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Law; Geography","score_opus":0.05088228083580455,"score_gpt":0.3802947962725244,"score_spread":0.32941251543671984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W822681570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95784,0.00038390185,0.00043190745,0.0031341312,0.00006988672,0.00016316978,0.000027555101,0.000010159903,0.037939243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975345,0.00017650373,0.00018980926,0.00019739674,0.00002386678,0.00006868511,0.000016708798,0.0000064199207,0.0017859624],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881144,0.006534401,0.0003564538,0.0005147734,0.0022319993,0.0022479673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98710245,0.004435355,0.003415879,0.00091060007,0.0019949914,0.0021406848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014471833,0.0003896469,0.0003510679,0.00287611,0.014265067,0.011240962,0.0030367204,0.002104454,0.007638501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027740693,0.00038293828,0.0007007145,0.0019742083,0.021641733,0.009930912,0.016107967,0.004680627,0.0005895357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011130132,0.00036875228,0.04501076,0.0001233891,0.000022713813,0.00042082302,0.9073137,0.00012474002,0.00024274347,0.016876824,0.0020204377,0.027363794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038079993,0.000052737025,0.02081378,0.00006410385,0.0000063901716,0.000080373335,0.9726132,0.000091929134,0.000062718456,0.001186212,0.0050122635,0.000012448472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012711106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020357136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9872889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0083328225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074257287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076535285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W828063601","doi":"","title":"Feeling Relational: The Use of Buddhist Meditation in Restorative Practices","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meditation; Restorative justice; Buddhism; Humanities; Emptiness; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Ethnology; Psychology; Law; Criminology; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.13634336597522256,"score_gpt":0.35804567402626086,"score_spread":0.2217023080510383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W828063601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55053,0.022179069,0.02716751,0.026601002,0.0007984548,0.00010082625,0.000074730306,0.00015354532,0.3723949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926529,0.0016637833,0.001986027,0.00074500556,0.00006491117,0.000025278301,0.000010975394,0.00003180024,0.002819247],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965609,0.0025119744,0.000067551664,0.0002929197,0.00031680963,0.00024974524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972224,0.0018419966,0.00032216095,0.00028481567,0.000108037464,0.00022056085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003531927,0.0003821181,0.00029004746,0.00085386506,0.0055604433,0.006079882,0.001069646,0.0016390996,0.0028659264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006261758,0.00035912532,0.00034037972,0.0008614681,0.025826437,0.005328168,0.008019622,0.0037908275,0.00023380344],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005905569,0.000052729087,0.0013509772,0.00021901146,0.000026204456,0.0002984836,0.76391697,0.00007915392,0.0012174333,0.21021914,0.0011435543,0.021417275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007354044,0.00024870713,0.019496776,0.0012475855,0.00017565368,0.0020000709,0.6133774,0.0007719974,0.0026399228,0.11634216,0.24354592,0.00008030952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038019342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052845115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006079882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028605545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010534197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020754933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W83215051","doi":"","title":"Practising the Virtues of Amiability and Civility in Pride and Prejudice. (Conference Papers)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Persuasions; The Jane Austen Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humility; Pride; Perfection; Virtue; Courtesy; Civility; Passions; Philosophy; Kindness; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Law; Theology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04281530106415868,"score_gpt":0.3233823416646982,"score_spread":0.2805670406005395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W83215051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004906713,0.18688901,0.00044456546,0.29396737,0.023176488,0.00005130711,0.00005697999,0.000060994862,0.49044657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21175304,0.062929265,0.0008833601,0.05041026,0.010870215,0.0001512234,0.00007710054,0.00013678975,0.66278875],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991353,0.00037657048,0.000021630822,0.00010687338,0.00017033084,0.00018930441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990306,0.00033992648,0.000057473917,0.000057446683,0.0001167762,0.0003977093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016245183,0.00045818492,0.00025274805,0.00048338855,0.005751045,0.007011281,0.0006316894,0.004835464,0.021920966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026654887,0.00027246564,0.00023614393,0.00069880986,0.006431033,0.004537628,0.002989908,0.0063083717,0.0043265405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019131978,0.000039272036,0.00021540745,0.00013667044,0.0000037906627,0.00008117403,0.006536818,0.000032327902,0.00009514139,0.07948169,0.86309594,0.050262596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076489405,0.00001120061,0.0017359635,0.000328195,0.0000017487797,0.00008139401,0.005725911,0.000016894344,0.00006502362,0.01030154,0.98171896,0.000005527271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013418089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04217094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021920966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004700676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045499154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073332965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W85585993","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Peoples and the Law: Comparative and Critical Perspectives","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Indigenous rights; Aotearoa; Law; Sovereignty; Human rights; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0184145415422912,"score_gpt":0.2510950958742552,"score_spread":0.23268055433196402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W85585993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03735895,0.30160165,0.001948593,0.18065974,0.0057731657,0.000101659316,0.00006245632,0.0000350422,0.47245875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72793335,0.18433279,0.0019309291,0.020440971,0.009334012,0.00046186024,0.0000754733,0.00006546237,0.05542516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927919,0.004741531,0.00012975343,0.00030632064,0.0009821818,0.0010483805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99120927,0.007034348,0.00037064202,0.00018717471,0.0007377651,0.0004607601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007933823,0.000781174,0.0010006117,0.006634127,0.02360891,0.01562743,0.0029580912,0.008114873,0.0047792667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009309053,0.0004898616,0.00048754446,0.0078821825,0.050450977,0.011379001,0.0062352493,0.006554325,0.00033906073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011036485,0.000050933006,0.00018522769,0.0003311691,0.000005766841,0.00035942034,0.12762764,0.00010248256,0.000060290706,0.84542614,0.01804809,0.0077919587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010881167,0.000045122655,0.001192874,0.002146119,0.000011551989,0.0003423605,0.2724718,0.00023868632,0.00009907034,0.17299065,0.5504229,0.000027917089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040655117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03826156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040655117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026644617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013316586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19332111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W85857415","doi":"10.21991/c9d962","title":"Redressing the Harms of Government (In)Action: A Section 7 Versus Section 15 Charter Showdown","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Redress; Harm; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Supreme court; Action (physics); Framing (construction); Law and economics; Sociology; Business; History","score_opus":0.048625248510399545,"score_gpt":0.30340101101388656,"score_spread":0.254775762503487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W85857415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.110180356,0.011171596,0.015355415,0.1839833,0.007954885,0.00024350086,0.00014807109,0.00036081873,0.6706021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8003148,0.006244158,0.008632521,0.13469243,0.004471016,0.00030519048,0.00010080193,0.00014637684,0.04509265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831549,0.0047844863,0.00076374685,0.0012425164,0.0060032313,0.0040509813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98168564,0.013447019,0.0014280839,0.00084224774,0.0018108512,0.00078618276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022321342,0.00064959016,0.00076925854,0.0017242448,0.008527035,0.015127894,0.003872346,0.018515015,0.004234876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021351963,0.0006700615,0.0013432833,0.00094848167,0.02045206,0.007494788,0.0063184076,0.017464824,0.00092729967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039314287,0.000055017295,0.0010421642,0.00008328718,0.000011754838,0.0006662311,0.003908962,0.00039411162,0.0008128312,0.9543526,0.02706034,0.011573288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011458273,0.0010509354,0.013160066,0.0030764325,0.00029199707,0.001665347,0.015607226,0.0041396203,0.008812971,0.33604038,0.61548465,0.000555733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027319774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055135433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9726802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077730333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019075764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11804795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W932158291","doi":"","title":"Puisne justice : Australia, common law, puisne, list of puisne justices of the supreme court of Canada, associate justice, lord ordinary, Sri Lanka, Hong Kong, judge","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"Betascript Pub. eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sri lanka; Law; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; History; Ancient history; South asia","score_opus":0.05031207357757568,"score_gpt":0.29435070544973446,"score_spread":0.2440386318721588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W932158291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028231705,0.018459138,0.0005126988,0.012834296,0.0021763314,0.00014358485,0.0011938455,0.00023878094,0.96161807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0058225077,0.0015152034,0.00017633321,0.0025900116,0.00010766479,0.000030209347,0.00015843396,0.00006247231,0.9895371],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996425,0.000024877274,0.000011705735,0.000044967,0.00019502566,0.00008089724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995709,0.00005318227,0.00001934975,0.000017485878,0.00026129166,0.000077758195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031882006,0.0005379495,0.00030846742,0.0015220345,0.0066244304,0.003250521,0.00067917653,0.0018286522,0.08222307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015633791,0.00067182764,0.00020760085,0.0018569486,0.0010648952,0.002353842,0.0010047776,0.003591923,0.02000756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005265636,0.000012934693,0.00014975309,0.000037722548,0.0000010405988,0.000034222918,0.00050195673,0.000022510218,0.000056320023,0.018693484,0.96534294,0.015141867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024810574,0.000004640458,0.0015918484,0.0000710223,0.0000017206332,0.000037738264,0.00041119516,0.000039156723,0.000057199282,0.0017520023,0.99602485,0.0000061013143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5327097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8335862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46729028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007816288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012838106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9400845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W94353500","doi":"10.29173/agora12404","title":"What’s Mine is Hers: A Solution to Common Law Property Woes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Division (mathematics); Property law; Law; Common law; Inequality; Common property; Law and economics; Real property; Political science; Sociology; Property rights; Philosophy; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10625960575862008,"score_gpt":0.35225136832048276,"score_spread":0.24599176256186267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W94353500","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04964799,0.0038057114,0.017856292,0.658792,0.0033120548,0.000110423935,0.000097086544,0.0002326349,0.26614588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7549687,0.002306047,0.00890234,0.07751212,0.0008765564,0.00008600667,0.000092024835,0.00017150417,0.15508471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993523,0.0015803714,0.000110783905,0.00060600485,0.0020591936,0.0021207153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939195,0.0011348106,0.00038771768,0.00066620996,0.0021196585,0.0017721426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061418866,0.0004864392,0.00059611624,0.0016934678,0.022323309,0.009074707,0.0022649353,0.0062285224,0.014555414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015943456,0.00027752167,0.0005783844,0.0014963056,0.029468892,0.009849079,0.0098329885,0.0077428436,0.001525596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041503983,0.00007637873,0.0028966952,0.00011208085,0.000029813542,0.00048142252,0.024520105,0.00039956477,0.00052567903,0.7954352,0.11187479,0.06360678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035518653,0.00006100573,0.0024758375,0.00039199975,0.000035649748,0.00027729268,0.055187404,0.00080544,0.0006023611,0.2276155,0.71245575,0.000056320274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33551934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5785966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33551934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017095843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04758827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6671328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W9510936","doi":"","title":"A Common Law of the Family? Reflections on Rick v. Brandsema","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Precedent; Common law; Damages; Political science; Statutory law; Statute; Unconscionability; Doctrine; Adversarial system","score_opus":0.030643312137787357,"score_gpt":0.3436963505419684,"score_spread":0.313053038404181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W9510936","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071615,0.01643288,0.0012837432,0.715779,0.0008275192,0.000046997196,0.0002755115,0.00003113176,0.19370817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80861723,0.004441234,0.0009240177,0.14478439,0.00036232965,0.000026654987,0.0000567179,0.000037687332,0.04074967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99483263,0.0009246997,0.0000961051,0.0005329229,0.0014790954,0.0021345338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754095,0.0009684281,0.00009210131,0.00007804425,0.00078738056,0.0005330758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040239342,0.00030537162,0.0004562885,0.0010630225,0.031311803,0.008606222,0.0032350342,0.01062612,0.0036132634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067237276,0.0004060059,0.00056448183,0.0014237751,0.030277817,0.004197617,0.0025958575,0.01026678,0.00025957567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000157073,0.000017258497,0.0013448804,0.000027290052,0.000009006164,0.00076518126,0.029685615,0.000250127,0.00019886045,0.87499917,0.08572254,0.0069644647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055913057,0.000030834395,0.0121699,0.00063880085,0.0000406233,0.00069396885,0.09092049,0.0009628786,0.0007463974,0.21708652,0.676454,0.00019965174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98466265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9897013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98466265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10090903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08364223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7321497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W967315131","doi":"10.29173/alr1370","title":"Expressive Harms and the Strands of Charter Equality: Drawing out Parallel Coherent Approaches to Discrimination","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Normative; Law; Sociology; Expression (computer science); Harm; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2167821349028373,"score_gpt":0.3395492063579511,"score_spread":0.12276707145511381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W967315131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04535543,0.02061432,0.05650471,0.1196446,0.000952738,0.00019275931,0.00008020888,0.00009494965,0.75656027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9436098,0.008300253,0.012332003,0.012385299,0.00043424795,0.00033404797,0.000043932083,0.00007657391,0.02248392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.976354,0.013473258,0.00065024826,0.0013339983,0.0058923014,0.0022961993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840136,0.011449999,0.0011242894,0.0013173408,0.001510119,0.0005846141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016269019,0.0007461804,0.0011699175,0.006857576,0.012213296,0.02381102,0.003516145,0.00953081,0.0028428813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01971829,0.00059891073,0.0008782655,0.0047803535,0.11475677,0.014735444,0.008711677,0.011800636,0.00030874164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002277249,0.00000400801,0.000037542497,0.000009472995,0.000001091734,0.00001423768,0.0026694406,0.00008651553,0.0000071856953,0.994962,0.00035071655,0.0018554479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016173288,0.000011493455,0.00041851978,0.0002070716,0.000009803703,0.00002571194,0.005711106,0.0004891009,0.0001052804,0.95526,0.037722528,0.000023142831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1035407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11250177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8964593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033211783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025824679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24096948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W970194839","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2636523","title":"British Columbia's New Family Law on Guardianship, Relocation, and Family Violence: The First Year of Judicial Interpretation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Relocation; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Family law; Criminology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.008418540867135128,"score_gpt":0.25030207958227924,"score_spread":0.24188353871514412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W970194839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30681682,0.012931338,0.0013469191,0.28206578,0.004938037,0.0004978262,0.004929956,0.00013941662,0.38633394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62330216,0.0053777313,0.0015763949,0.06230973,0.0008196288,0.00029086508,0.0013289459,0.00014709115,0.3048474],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923734,0.0010499232,0.00036901142,0.00045482384,0.003125033,0.0026278791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731504,0.010751029,0.0010946019,0.0010600478,0.009827133,0.0041168104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008027004,0.00032172105,0.0005976204,0.002952029,0.02182282,0.011769039,0.0029401584,0.009963104,0.0076929126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033761777,0.0011132393,0.0004229088,0.002844938,0.005384752,0.00272974,0.003592904,0.016768854,0.0007054308],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023652005,0.00057020003,0.049889844,0.00023423202,0.00005352247,0.0029077665,0.039181348,0.0011610104,0.0011821773,0.13147587,0.6756339,0.09747358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070235066,0.000066249544,0.19408657,0.00084254355,0.000084248575,0.00029767308,0.036057092,0.000900365,0.0010424559,0.008645049,0.7576551,0.00025249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97639585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99585295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08068509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08068509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17073028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58541405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W97498150","doi":"","title":"Law and Morality in Public Discourse: How Christians Can Rebuild Our Culture","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Forgiveness; Faith; Prayer; Morality; Sociology; Law; Public morality; Religious studies; Theology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.039647393788616835,"score_gpt":0.33254266138270494,"score_spread":0.2928952675940881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W97498150","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06607601,0.016255265,0.00508441,0.4554434,0.0024427765,0.000061419356,0.00006169169,0.00020956686,0.45436552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97015667,0.0017940471,0.0007933255,0.008647261,0.00043396917,0.00003326343,0.000016982656,0.000103696795,0.01802079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868513,0.010057648,0.00020308996,0.00055078574,0.0008832955,0.0014540225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981433,0.012223771,0.0008984649,0.0015443809,0.0015788072,0.0023215886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016967636,0.0006712881,0.00061221694,0.0026669772,0.036186777,0.03472838,0.0024425674,0.010845635,0.009942274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021137951,0.00056415447,0.000419356,0.0021101928,0.130145,0.020210708,0.011628576,0.011085587,0.00090967503],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013884361,0.00003340776,0.00028896748,0.00007596985,0.000005521174,0.00024421938,0.35695302,0.0001104375,0.000092647766,0.6175824,0.018215803,0.006383837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027239854,0.000024470424,0.0005938519,0.00065841764,0.0000127316325,0.00015997206,0.44982263,0.0003062579,0.00028497548,0.21800497,0.33005935,0.00004510253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04469228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04588023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04469228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027322128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019556314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19823682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W98171210","doi":"10.25071/fbcf0148","title":"Treaty rights, the Indian Act, and the Canadian Constitution: The Supreme Court’s 1999 decisions","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada Watch","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitution","score_opus":0.02065652773363634,"score_gpt":0.25424252956615045,"score_spread":0.2335860018325141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W98171210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052161034,0.01165147,0.0009417457,0.24199526,0.0023083503,0.00017296008,0.0015769943,0.000067734465,0.6891245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53458434,0.008413904,0.0019322144,0.17368078,0.001152682,0.00020482468,0.0005816939,0.00018923108,0.27926028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98625714,0.0010909444,0.00026407302,0.0009233347,0.005320533,0.00614402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989791,0.0038066169,0.0003920478,0.00033842013,0.0039531644,0.0017186556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007667612,0.00075226347,0.00093689095,0.0034909789,0.046052217,0.02315347,0.0054701017,0.019219391,0.014261448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024924256,0.0012925257,0.0013369597,0.0068833306,0.016855072,0.004405593,0.004123097,0.022530435,0.001016502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006952982,0.00006205988,0.0016027672,0.000050453844,0.000027833301,0.00025483986,0.005810127,0.00039762683,0.00024878865,0.77200836,0.210192,0.0092756795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018436248,0.000029459228,0.019356389,0.00063711265,0.00025323432,0.000104440835,0.016278353,0.0009796325,0.0010020958,0.056430187,0.90443456,0.00031017716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99520457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99806494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19680789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19680789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3071819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.931589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W981815983","doi":"","title":"L'obligation d'accommodement raisonnable en matière religieuse: une notion canadienne","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutions: Revue de droit constitutionnel appliqué","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.035553406667716815,"score_gpt":0.26156678356463114,"score_spread":0.22601337689691434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W981815983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12114398,0.013340118,0.020024734,0.10542975,0.00083666714,0.000051067567,0.00012530513,0.000068662725,0.7389797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665259,0.0023598904,0.0024030134,0.0035498103,0.00045995996,0.00009868557,0.00003134177,0.000052349016,0.02451906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921886,0.0047274684,0.00020702896,0.00067488017,0.0010837027,0.001118447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99461716,0.0030387412,0.0005976137,0.00066706014,0.00059884146,0.00048062488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008275002,0.00043089132,0.0007546843,0.0013298494,0.008697165,0.012533448,0.001770106,0.0073380247,0.006276944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009957047,0.0005201515,0.0005376731,0.0022194257,0.051224973,0.009531026,0.0066357735,0.010225885,0.0006355352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039785873,0.000004829846,0.000097326774,0.00000917035,0.0000015194624,0.000020104217,0.009402931,0.000034058958,0.000036266567,0.98910964,0.00042194032,0.0008582516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049676997,0.000027138063,0.002131423,0.00028734203,0.000016049386,0.0002070779,0.018798256,0.00037248473,0.00016995259,0.7443362,0.23356336,0.00004098503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028668579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023492502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9713314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075949356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007509401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05700344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}